Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 30980STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TEXAS § CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO.�� WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth ("City") and Black & Veatch Corporation ("Consultant") made and entered into City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 3011 l, (the "Contract") which was authorized by the City Council by M&C C-20107 on June 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Contract involves professional services related to the development of rates for wholesale wastewater customers of the City; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend the Contract to include an increased scope of work and/or revised maximum fee. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant, acting herein by and through their duly authorized representatives, enter into the following agreement that amends the contract: 1. Section 2, Scope of Services, of the Contract is amended to include the additional consultant services described in Consultant's proposal letter of September 23, 2004 and the attachments thereto, copies of which are both attached hereto and incorporated herein. The cost for these additional services to be performed by Consultant shall not exceed $24,800, provided that Consultant has the ability to utilize the City's current Retail Cost of Service computer models cost shall not exceed $24,800. If Consultant is unable to utilize these models, Consultant and City will negotiate an additional amendment to the Contract if the cost of the additional services will exceed $24,800, or this amendment will terminate at such time as Consultant has expended the additional fee. 2. Section 4, Compensation to the Consultant and Method of Payment, of the Contract is amended to provide for an increase in the not-to-exceed fee to be paid to Consultant for all work and services under the Contract, as amended, so that the not-to-exceed fee to be paid by City for all work and services is $120,350. -, � � ��,., L ;,;'��;�;i� '��. � v J ''� '��rJ..J � , ,_, , � � ����ti� •c,'��''� ��`-,:�;�:� ��� �;;'.", J'�:� n i �u'� �� � �RIGINAL � Based on the fact that the City has authorized Consultant to utilize its current Retail Cost of Service computer models, City acknowledges that the outcomes produced by Consultant will be a result of the information contained in these models. Therefore, Consultant shall not be responsible or liable for any information produced for this amendment that is later determined to be a result of incorrect data generated by these models, including, but not limited to, situations where these models do not contain up to date information. 4. All other provisions of the Contract that are not expressly amended herein shall remain in full force and effect. Executed on this the� day of�6e� r, 04. APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: Fort Worth Water Department r f ,./ -�,/1.��/�/ � (�� vFrank Crumb, P. E. Acting Director ATTEST: Marty Hendrix City Secretary �l.O �Yl� "oni_�:act_. �u�horz�atio� ATTEST: e._�-.�.._�. --�--, n���=� Corporate Secretary BLACK & VEATCH OUTSIDE CITY RATE STUDY AMENDMENT Page 2 of 2 CITY OF FORT WORTH By: , / Marc O� t Assistant City Manager Approved as to Form and Legality Assistant Ci Attorney Black & Veatch Corporation By: c�- William C. Cole Vice President t �::;'��r�1� J: ;, : J J U C� ;;�s'�; :'?.; �., � �. I ��� `:'.`.��,`Jl:l�;� V �G:, �� B��I� F� VE�4T�H 9441 LBJ Freeway, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75243 USA Tel: (214) 570-7033 Fax: (214) 570-7049 September 23, 2004 City of Fort Worth Water Department Administration Kara L. Shuror Senior Administrative Services Manager 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Subj ect: Contract Amendment Dear Ms. Shuror: Black & Veatch International Company This letter requests an amendment to contract CSC No. 30111 between the City of Fort Worth (the "City") and Black and Veatch Corporation (the "Consultant"). Attached is the proposed scope of services and fee estimate for assistance in developing a rate for customers outside the City limits. The cost of the amendment will not exceed $24,800 for a total not to exceed amount of $120,350 for CSC No. 30111. The purpose of this amendment is to provide assistance to the City in the determination of an Outside City retail rate differential. Again, a further detailed scope of services to be rendered by the Consultant is attached. The contract amendment price of $ 24,800 is based upon the Consultants ability to obtain and make use of the City's current retail cost of service computer models: All other issues/conflicts shall be handled as addressed in the original contract CSC No. 30111. Should there be any questions concerning this amendment, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Richard L. Campbell Senior Consultant Black & Veatch Corporation i � u'��. 2 'I �1 ,�; a '';;� �'���, � �,.1.( �\.'Jh't l ,� tS`7U:���J � ?^ "i: � , °"i�l� J� �'R��°::':,��, ��j � � U I� �t 7 � ''�.'iir1. �:�' I �LG o , �.����Ji P� � Black & Veatch August 2004 Fort Worth Water Department City of Fort Worth, Texas Proposed Scope of Work and Fee Estimate For Assistance with Determination of Outside City Retail Rate Differential It is our understanding that the Fort Worth Water Department would like to make a determination of what an appropriate and supportable rate differential would be between inside City retail (owner customers) rates and outside City retail rates. Black & Veatch proposes to utilize Fort Worth's existing computer rate models in this effort to be as efiicient as possible. It is presumed that these models have been recent�y updated with all necessary information for determining water and wastewater retail rates, wholesale water rates, and wholesale wastewater rates for the test years 2004-05. Scoue of Work Black & Veatch proposes to conduct the following scope of work in the determination of a supportable outside City rate differential. 1.0 Review Current Rate Models We will obtain and review the Department's water and wastewater cost of service/rate models that have recently been updated by Water Department staff for determining recent rates for water/wastewater retail, wholesale water, and wholesale wastewater purposes. For clarification, these three models were used for deriving the rates prepared for implementation in fiscal year (FY) 2005. Upon receipt of the models, we will evaluate the retail rate model for its usefulness and identify where any modifications will need to be made to convert it to a"utility basis" of cost determination. Concurrently, the Department's wholesale water and wholesale wastewater rate models will be evaluated for the purpose of identifying selected "utility basis" cost allocation tabulations to incorporate into the retail rate model for deternuning outside City retail cost of service/rates. Where questions of interpretation are required in the evaluation of the models, it is expected that Department representatives will be available and respond to any explanations that might need to be given. 2.0 Modify Current Models to Reflect New Service to Outside City Customers We will modify the Department's current retail rate model to convert it from a"cash basis" to a"utility basis" of cost of service determination. Following accepted industry rate methodologies, a utility basis of cost of service determination will be used for -,_ - �`v �f � �� �,, f 5°�'; � 't:.��v�J �':'J ,,, -� �� r-: �, r � : ; 'v��'�� �:�=''�,:'1���iL' ..: � Q '�. c�? ; r;r�,`i 1 � � U .,'��J; � ,1: II Jl � � 6�. � � `'✓ i � __� � determining outside City rates that recover the costs for operation & maintenance expense, depreciation expense, return on rate base, and street rentaL Where necessary and appropriate and to the greatest extent practical, the utility basis cost allocations for depreciation and rate base will be used from the Deparhnent's wholesale models and incorporated into the modified retail model. A rate of return equal to or slightly greater than that allowed for in the Department's wholesale contracts will be used. The new modified model will be updated to reflect the addition of a new retail class of customer for outside City service. The estimated number of customers by meter size and water/wastewater sales volumes will be provided by Department staff together with any information that may be available on their class maximum day/hour water demands and contributed wastewater strengths. The cost to provide service to outside City retail customers (non-owners) will be determined through an allocation of functionalized costs to the outside City retail class based upon their presumed use of the City's water and wastewater systems. The cost results from the modified "utility basis" cost of service determination for outside City retail customers will be equated to an average unit cost per thousand gallons of annual water consumption / wastewater contribution compared to a similar unit cost for inside City retail service for determining what a supportable rate differential would be. 3.0 Meetings and Presentations We will meet with Fort Worth Water Department representatives twice during the course of this study to explain the rate determination process and to consider any options that may need to be further investigated. Black & Veatch will be available to participate in additional meetings such as with outside City representatives at an additional cost to be determined and agreed upon between the Deparhnent and Consultant. 4.0 Executive Summary Report We will prepare an executive summary report delineating all assumptions and methodologies used in the determination of the outside City rate differential including findings which may be used to support higher rates to non-owner customers. A draft of the report will be furnished to the Department for review. Following the receipt of any comments, a final report will be prepared and ten (10) copies provided to the Department. Proposed Fee It is estimated that our proposed fee for the above specified services would be $24,800. The estimate includes all labor and expenses at our out-of-pocket costs. For contract purposes, we propose a cost plus with maximum fee limit type of agreement for the services described above. Fort Worth would be billed for time expended on the project at our hourly billing rates plus direct expenses at our out-of-pocket cost. Invoices would be 2 ;,J:� _' ; °, , � . ,�. �.-� � ��f��'��:=!� '1;�1��J�.v �,• � .a n �,1.5 r(��-;; �,7 ` " ��1V� �1'�'� ���;� �I ='���{ � 3 J �� :..' ^ [.S�itr ��� �( �__=—=, ..:.: ; �. ,P� � ,. � issued monthly with payment due within 30 days. Our cost estimate is broken-down according to the following task assigrunents: Task 1.0 Model review/verification 2.0 Modify model for OCL rates 3.0 Meetings 4.0 Summary Report Total Labor Effort (hours) Billing Rate ($/hr.) Total Labor Cost Direct Expenses to include technology chaxge Total Fee Estimate Senior Consultant hours 8 44 12 8 72 $175 $12,600 3 Associate Consultant hours 12 68 8 12 100 $100 $10,000 Total $22,600 2 200 $24,800 �., 2 � � �,"� =�, �: i f1�,�-`,�. �'Sv�)a ✓ '� t � , . ��,1 i U,�; .:�I} �"' r�1���.Y,tj� i � S �i If �L LL.�� ` ^ � `��,i:�'�,(', Il l��i �;2'�� . � �;1 u+-i