HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 33129-A2 CITY SECRETARY
CONTRACT NO.-13-3\'A-A-L
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO ENGINEERING CONTRACT
STATE OF TEXAS § CITY SECRETARY
COUNTY OF TARRANT § Contract No.
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth (City) and TCB (Engineer) made and entered
into City Secretary Contract No. 33129 (the "Contract") on the 24`h day of January, 2006;
and
WHEREAS, the Contract involves engineering services for the following project:
Watershed 2004 CIP, Planning Studies for Forest Park and Berry Storm Drain
Watershed, Phase 2
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to amend said Contract to include an
increased scope of work and revised maximum fee;
NOW THEREFORE, City and Engineer, acting herein by and through their duly
authorized representatives, enter into the following agreement which amends the Contract:
1.
Article I, Section 1 of the Contract is amended to include the additional engineering
services specified in a proposal letter and Attachment"A" dated February 11, 2011, a copy
of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. The cost to City for the additional
services to be performed by Engineer is Two Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Seven
Hundred Dollars ($279,700).
2.
Article III of the Contract is amended to provide for an increase in the maximu m
fee to be paid to Engineer for all work and services performed under the Contract, as
amended, so that the total fee paid by the City for all work and services shall not exceed
the sum of Nine Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and Two Hundred Dollars ($925,200).
3.
Engineer acknowledges its commitment to o btain an additional 16.9% M/WBE
participation for this amendment. The Engineer's commitment for the Contract remains
unchanged.
4.
All other provisions of the Contract, which are not expressly amended her
remain in full force and effect. OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TX
t
EXECUTED on this the day of 2011, in
Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: CITY OF FORT WORTH
1 0, L13 By:
DouglasW. Wiersig, P.E. Fernando Costa
Departmen of Transportation an Assistant City Manager
�,,auntt
Public Works p,y®* FO� �� �
p' 0000 0000
firr 00IVcuHSTOFORM AND TEST : '�a %Orr
Y: F-1
0 0�
0
°
/ ? 0)0 0
0
Doug Black vh.�c c- 2W��yAj4 �a o00000a0000°0 pv
Assistant City Attorney City Secreta�' 4 �� �,
ATTEST: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
i
By:
Don D'Adam.
Vice President
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
2 FT. WORTH, TX
ATTACHMENT"A"
ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR
FOREST PARK—BERRY STORM DRAIN WATERSHED PLANNING STUDY(PHASE 2)
AMENDMENT TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 33129
(February 11, 2011)
In accordance with the terms and conditions of Turner Collie& Braden Inc.'s(TCB)Agreement(City of
Fort Worth Contract No. 33129)signed January 10, 2006, authorized January 24, 2006, this document
serves as AECOM's request for additional compensation for Additional Services related to the
referenced project.
Based on a project meeting with the City of Fort Worth Stormwater Management(City) and the City of
Fort Worth Zoo(Zoo) officials on July 27, 2010 it was determined that there is a need to model Stream
CF-3C (Zoo Creek)from the storm drain outfall of the Forest Park—Berry watershed to the oxbow in
the Clear Fork Trinity River(Figure A-1). Based on discussions at the meeting, it was determined that
an existing conditions analysis and Hydrogeomorphic Study would be required of Zoo Creek. This
analysis would provide the City and the Zoo officials with a better understanding of the creek's current
geomorphic state and identify potential solutions to address the ongoing erosion and deposition issues
along the creek. As such, the following tasks shall be performed as part of this authorization.
A. Basic Services
1 Data Collection
a. Obtain best available existing conditions topography inside the Zoo property limits.
b. Obtain as-built plans for grade control structures and crossings along Stream CF-3C (Zoo
Creek).
c. Obtain as-built plans for City utilities along Zoo Creek.
d. Perform a field visit to obtain photographic documentation at erosion and deposition sites,
crossings, and grade control structures.
2. Field Survey
a. Project Control
i. Set primary GPS survey control throughout project site. Set conventional secondary
control at structure and cross section sites.
ii. Establish vertical control relative to City of Fort Worth benchmark control network.
Compare City benchmarks to FEMA reference marks. Establish horizontal survey
control relative to State Plane(grid) NAD83.
b. Hydraulic Structure Surreys
i. Provide survey data for the 15 hydraulic structures as shown on Figure A-2. Survey
data will include highest grade line of road, deck thickness, abutments, railings,
upstream and downstream flow lines, piers, upstream and downstream rip rap and/or
concrete apron limits, culvert/bridge length, and hydraulic width. Survey data on top of
road will extend 200 feet up station and 200 feet down station from each end of the
bridge.
ii. Provide one cross section upstream and downstream of the structure. These sections
will be at the upstream face and downstream face of the structure and will extend 200
feet from each channel bank running perpendicular to the creek, where accessible.
iii. Provide four photographs of each hydraulic structure including the upstream and
downstream faces of the structure as well as the upstream and downstream channel.
iv. Provide sketches of the upstream face and planimetric view of the hydraulic structures
showing the structure piers, channel banks, channel, direction of flow, rails, deck,
footings, abutments, culvert inverts, shape and size of opening, benchmark location,
photo location, and any other relevant dimensions or details of the structure.
c. Cross Section Survey
i. Provide survey data for the 11 cross sections shown on the attached Figure A-2
(green line). Survey data will extend 50 feet from each channel bank running
perpendicular to the creek, where accessible.
ii. Provide two photographs at each cross-section including one upstream and one
.downstream.
d. Miscellaneous Survey -Perform additional survey on an as-needed basis during the
course of the study. Services for this task shall not exceed Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000)
3. Environmental Field Reconnaissance
a. Collect and review information to help determine the existing conditions of the project
area including US Geological Survey quadrangle map(s), National Wetland Inventory
(NWI)map(s), Tarrant County Soil Survey and hydric soil list, and readily available aerial
photography,
b. Perform an environmental reconnaissance along the creek to identify, characterize and
document the existing conditions relative to Section 404 jurisdictional areas in
accordance to US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) requirements.
C. Analyze the data collected from the previous task to determine if the project area
contains areas subject to Section 404 within and immediately adjacent to the project
area.
d. Prepare a brief report addressing the results of the investigation and preliminary
determination of Section 404 permitting requirements for the proposed project.
4. Rainfall Analysis (Vieux &Associates)
a. Collect and analyze the best available precipitation data for the June 28, 2004 flood event.
b. Rain Gauge Data: Gauge network data is vital in the historical analysis of storm events.
Request and obtain data with spatial coordinates for the rain gauge network and period of
record from the following agencies:
• City of Fort Worth
• Tarrant Regional Water District(TRWD)
• United States Geological Survey(USGS)
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)
• City of Grand Prairie
• National Weather Service (NWS)
c. Conduct quality control and review of the rain gauge data to identify gaps in service,
clogging, and spikes.
d. Assemble and prepare rain gauge data for use in radar rainfall analysis.
e. Radar Rainfall Analysis: Radar estimates provide high resolution spatial data that is
representative of rainfall over a watershed. Rain gauge data can be used to enhance and
quality control the radar rainfall estimates. The combined use of gauge and radar rainfall
measurements can improve hydrologic model results and hydrologic prediction when
adjusted using rain gauge data. For the June 28, 2004 rainfall event, radar rainfall
estimates will be generated using rain gauge data as follows:
i. Assemble gauge and radar data to cover the storm event and antecedent periods.
ii. Compare and evaluate base data (Level 2) reflectivity and NWS Multi-sensor
Precipitation estimates(MPE)for the storm totals.
iii. Identify and map storm return period storm event in relation to flooded areas.
iv. Evaluate rainfall depth and intensity distribution for the Forest Park—Berry watershed.
v. Generate gridded rainfall maps for use in hydrologic modeling.
vi. Produce synoptic overview and descriptive statistics report.
5. Hydrogeomorphic Study(Dr. Peter Allen)
a. Investigate the reach using stream reconnaissance techniques
i. Characterize the channel geometry (bars, pools, riffles, and cross-sectional
characteristics), channel stability status(erosion, slumps, knickpoints, and earthflows),
bed and bank materials, riparian vegetation, floodplain configuration, man-made
obstructions and woody debris dams.
ii. Channel surveys will record data in 200 foot survey reaches, which will be compiled
into an overall stream assessment and tied to engineering topographic information.
Digital photographs will be collected for each survey reach and for major
structural/erosion problems. These will be noted by GPS locations.
iii. Samples of bed and bank material will be assessed and one or more representative
submerged jet test will be performed to assess erosion rates and critical tractive force
for erosion of bank material. Representative bed samples will be taken and D50 of
the samples will be determined. These will be tested in the lab with newly developed
submerged jet tractive force testing and compared to documented literature to
determine tractive force. Historical aerial photographs will be assessed to analyze
development history of the area and related to channel function.
b. Establish design discharge for the reach: The design discharge, which controls channel
dimensions, transport capacity and reach hydraulics, will be determined based on a
synthesis of field work, gage data, hydrology and hydraulics, bed material sizes, incipient
motion analysis, bed and bank stability among other criteria.
c. Determine equilibrium slope and potential for degradation: The bed material and design
discharge analysis will be used to determine the equilibrium slope of the channel or
potential for degradation in the reach. This also takes into account rates of rock erosion,
soil erosion, and stream transport function (frequency of bed material transporting floods
and local hard points). The SWAT-DEG model will be run on the study reach.
d. Results Analysis: The results from the aforementioned tasks shall be gathered and used
to determine the following:
i. Potential erosion hazards to existing structures and buildings along the channel
ii. Potential number of grade stabilization structures related to estimated degradation in
the reach.
iii. Description of the current and future status of the stream.
e. Deliverables: The following deliverables shall be prepared as part of the
Hydrogeomorphic Study.
i. Geomorphic assessment and summary of the stream reach. (Sediment input, reach
and planform stability, and processes (mass failure and degree erosion along reach).
ii. Prioritization of erosion problems in study reach.
iii. Estimates of potential channel degradation and grade stabilization requirements for
the reach.
iv. Digital photographs of reach and problem areas.
v. Documentation of above analysis in a report format.
6. Existing Conditions Analysis
a. Surveyed cross-sections from Task A.2 shall be extended, if required, and additional
cross-sections shall be cut at an approximate spacing of 200 feet. The 2009 TNRIS 1-foot
contours shall be used to do this.
b. An existing conditions hydraulic model using the best available terrain data and the field
survey information shall be created.
c. Storm events for the 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year frequencies shall be
modeled using the drainage area delineations for local drainage determined in Phase III
and the existing conditions hydrograph from the InfoWorks model at the outfall of the
Forest Park—Berry storm drain system.
d. Account for routing within the stream reach using the Modified-Puts method.
e. Obtain modeling results for design discharge obtained from the Hydrogeomorphic Study.
f. Develop one(1) conceptual alternative to stabilize the creek based on the hydraulic
analysis and Hydrogeomorphic Study.
g. Prepare an existing conditions report compiling the results of the hydrogeomorphic,
hydraulic, and environmental investigations. The report will also provide a proposed
conceptual plan outlining the proposed stabilization measures along the creek. The
100-year existing floodplain shall be mapped. Exhibits in this report are limited to a
Vicinity Map, Drainage Area Map, overall Work Map the existing conditions 100-year
floodplain mapping along Zoo Creek, and a conceptual level plan-profile sheets(11x17,
1:100 scale) of Zoo Creek showing the following:
i. Existing flow line of Zoo Creek based on the 2009 TNRIS 1-foot contours, rectified
where survey is available.
ii. Left and Right channel bank stations based on the 1-foot contours, survey, and
aerials.
iii. Water Surface profiles for the channel forming discharge(usually 0.5-year to 1.25-
year frequency), 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, 100-year, and 500-year
existing conditions discharges.
iv. Graphical representation of stabilization measures proposed along Zoo Creek. These
representations shall be a visual aid to the City of the level of protection required at
these locations based on 1-foot contours derived from LiDAR data. Construction level
details shall not be provided due to the lack of field survey data. No typical cross-
sections shall be provided.
v. Removal of existing structures.
vi. Utility line crossings shall be shown based on best available as-builts for the utilities.
No separate survey shall be performed of the utilities unless authorized as part of
Task A.2.d or Task B.2.
7 Past On-Call Services
As part of this proposal, AECOM is requesting compensation for the following out-of-scope
tasks that have already been performed:
a. Water Quality Coordination: In 2010, AECOM provided on-call services to the City in
preparing a pilot study for its Water Quality initiative. AECOM has provided the City with
the deliverables pertaining to this task and anticipates no future work related to this effort.
b. Feasible Options Study On-Call Tasks
These tasks were performed by AECOM to assist the City and its Feasible Options Study
consultant in its investigation of feasible alternatives for the Forest Park—Berry
watershed.
i. Maps for lot/home flooding: The City requested AECOM to prepare a color graded
table and exhibit for the Forest Park—Berry storm drain system that showed the tally
and extent of lot and apparent home flooding for the 2-, 5-, 10-, and 100-year storm
events.
ii. As part of the Feasible Options Study, AECOM personnel have attended eight(S)
meetings to discuss methodology, alternatives, and provide insight on key aspects of
the project.
B. Additional Services
The City has requested AECOM to provide additional services to the City as a separate written
authorization. These tasks will be performed on a time and material basis with a not-to-exceed
budget. The additional services tasks include the following:
1 Attendance at an additional ten (10) Feasible Options Study meetings.
2. Other on-call services during the course of the Feasible Options Study.
C. Exclusions and Limitations
1 The hydraulic model shall be created in HEC-RAS v4.1 using the steady state module.
2. No environmental permitting or coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
shall be performed as part of the environmental reconnaissance effort.
3. No wetlands or limits of the OHWM shall be delineated as part of this effort.
4. Preparation of construction drawings for the proposed stabilization measures is not included
as part of this scope of services.
5. Two(2) copies of the report prepared in Task A.6 shall be prepared and submitted to the City
with digital data.
D. Schedule
The work associated with Basic Services Tasks A.1 through A.6 with will require 150 days to complete
from the Notice to Proceed.
Additional Services associated with Task B will require additional written authorization from the City.
E. Proposed Basis of Compensation and Liability
Tasks A.1-A.6 will be billed monthly on a lump sum basis with a line item for monthly time and
materials charges for Task B. Task A.7 shall be billed in full on the first month's invoice.
Total compensation for this supplemental shall be in the amount not-to-exceed $279,700 (Two
Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars and No Cents). Task B compensation shall
be on a time and materials basis in the amount not-to-exceed $35,060(Thirty Five Thousand Sixty
Dollars and No Cents). A written authorization will be required from the City to access Task B funds.
MIWBE participation for this supplemental is committed at 16.91%.
7th
- r 87
Lancastir
m
18
_ m
y� ry Vickery [
3
L o` Pennsylvania
. -
'j
Jo
h
.t
FortZrth
1
1 a
iIN River
W a
W
(*O(* m
G�ea x
Colonial Country Club
J
�K
Project Location
F 7
se"ry
eanbrook G /'
Bellaire .-.., rf
8iddiso
Source: StreetMap,2007. FOREST PARK - BERRY STORM DRAIN
WATERSHED PLANNING STUDY (PHASE III)
N
VICINITY MAP
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC.
17300 DALLAS
AXOMDALLAS,TEXAS 75248AY,SUITE 1010
WWIN.AECOM.COM
0 0.5 1 TBPE REG.NO.F-3580
Miles DATE:02/11 SECRETARY CONTRACT#: 33129 FIGUREA-1
`,4,4,
5' `.v ��'•- `v� - - .>... r t Arg, ;.$a �
e v
-.w.;•r•. ea RYu! r4',ti d� r ,4 ita+, ,�z �' �'` ,`,. i� A r.f.. A •
' � ri ,� �; "�� a f<�) q -� ,! 1.:�� � ^ t: �,; ;Via.. .v _.{M y t*W��. �: ��I.: •
•_� h.-2'.� 4 .. eke � --, � °x�-.«».- - — ,Pt.,� - `Y + t ilf.' c _
1 0 .f w �� ■ T$ Ah a R!
,� � i' J `� � - r t1.�n�'•7,. ,�1 g� 'li',,�v,I pts a'' i c p D
iv
At
�d
R.t�y_i 4P!��'�;y� µ'Y• `3j�—' }t,
EXHIBIT"B-2"-SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B
Label Category Other Direct Costs-detail
Totals 16 24 64 380 842 100 97 219 1,742 $ 196,480 $ 83,220 2793700 $ 6,220 $ 330 $ 385 $ 55 $ 69,300 $ 6,930
QA Proj Dir. Sr Engr Proj Mgr.Pmj Engr CAD Env Tech Env Sci. Total Total Total Total Equipmen 10%markup
$200 $200 $ 160 $ 140 $ 110 $ 75 $ 65 $ 85 Hours Labor Cost CDC Cost Trevel Printing VSa,lies Mailing Subs on Subs
st Co,Task Description Enter hours but$)below $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
A Basic Services
1Data Collection
Obtain lop,from Zoo 4 4 8 1,000 77 1,077 $ 77
b Obtain as-buile f t-truclures/crossings 4 4 440 77 517 77
Obtain utility maps/as-built, 4 4 440 77 'l
77
d Perform field visit 8 8 16 2,000 120 2,120 120
2 Field Survey 52,030 52,030 47,300 4,730
Coordinating with MLA 2 4 6 720 720
b OC Survey data 6 12 18 2,160 2,160
3Env.Recon
Dot a Review 4 4 340340
b Field Recon for wetlands 24 24 48 5,400 13566 6,966 1,126 385 55
Data Analysis 2 8 16 26 2,880 2,860
tl Report 2 B 16 26 2,880 330 3,210 330
4Radar Rainfall Analysis 5,500 5,500 5,000 500
Coordination with Vieux Associates 13 420 420
b Incorporating data in to final report 1 8 9 1,020 1,020
5 Hydmgeomorphic Study 18,700 18,700 17,000 1,700
Contemn-with Peter Allen 84 12 1,560 1,560
b Providing QC comments and inc,rpoduing data in to final report, 16 12 28 3,560 3,560
6Ezi,ting Conditions Analysis
Gut additional XS,extend survey XS(if needed) 2 8 40 50 5,840 5,840
b Prepare existing conditions hydraulic model 2 8 24 80 114 13,840 13,840
Obtain hydrology from FPB model 8 8 880 880
d Perform M,tl-Puts routing 2 4 16 40 62 7,680 7,680
Oblain results for bankhrl/tlesign discharges 2 8 12 22 2,760 2,760
f Prepare 1 conceptual alternative for mitigation 4 16 40 120 60 240 26,660 26,660
g Prepare Report 4 8 24 120 40 196 21,640 2,200 23,840 2,200
7 Miscellaneous Services
a Wale,Quality BMP Anaylsis and Study
Pilot Study8 120 40 100 268 25,580 860 26,440 860
Coordination with City of Arlington,TRWD,and Lake Worth 8 30 15 35 88 8,530 8,530
Storm Water Quality devices at Willow Lake,Graven bridge,Comanche Creek and Eastern Hills 40 30 70 6,350 6,350
Finalize documentation and Submittal for Pilot Study 20 12 24 56 5,020 5,020
b(i) Develop map of lots and apparent home flooding for Feasible Opllons Study consultant 8 32 40 4,64077 4,717 77
b fill Meetings for modeling methodology,results,and alternatives with lea,ible options.,.,intent(4) 12 12 24 4,080 308 4,388 308
Stakeholder meeting atandance(3) 6 12 18 2,880 231 3,111 231
Site Visit for Feasible Options Review(1) 6 6 1,200 77 1,277 77
B Atlditional Services
1Altentlance at feasible optionslstakehold,r/coordination meetings
Altentlance at feasible options meetings(3) 18 18 2,520 231 2,751 231
b Abandon-at st,k,h,ld,,meetings(3) 18 18 2,520 231 2,751 231
Attendanceat-dineti,n meetingswilh Dinaway(4) 24 24 3,360 308 3,668 308
2 Any future On-Call[asks during feasibility options review
Coordination of task items with Dunaway 29 40 64 7,780 77 7,837 77
b Feasible Options Close-out meeting(1) 6 6 6 18 2,460 77 2,537 77
c Refining feasible eptions mitigation options/meetings 2 50 74 126 15,460 66 15,526 66
Total 16 24 fi4 380 842 100 97 219 1,742 $ 196,480 It 83,220 $ 279,700 $ 6,220 $ 330 $ 385 $ 55 E 69.-30-0-$ -6-,930
.4_COM
EXHIBIT "B-3A"
(SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B)
SUMMARY OF TOTAL PROJECT FEES
ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR
FOREST PARK — BERRY STORM DRAIN WATERSHED PLANNING STUDY (PHASE 2)
AMENDMENT TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 33129
Consulting Firm Prime Responsibility Amount Percent
PRIME ENGINEER:
AECOM TECHNICAL Engineering, Proj. Mgmt. $210,400 75.22%
SERVICES, INC. Mgmt.
SUB CONSULTANT:
Marshall Lancaster and Field Survey $47,300 16.91%
Associates, Inc.
Dr. Peter Allen Hydrogeomorphic Analysis $17,000 6.08%
Vieux and Associates Radar Rainfall Analysis $5,000 179%
Total for Professional Services $279,700 100610-
Proiect Description Scope of Services Total Fee MWBE Fee Percent
Field Survey (see below) $279,700 $47,300 16.91%
Marshall Lancaster and Associates, Inc. shall participate in performing Task 2 as outlined
in Attachment "A
Non-MWBE Participation
Dr. Peter Allen 6.08%
Vieux and Associates, Inc. 1.79%
EXHIBIT"B-3A"
Page 1 of 1
ACOM AECOM 972 735 3000 tel
17300 Dallas Parkway 972 735 3001 fax
Suite 1010
Dallas,Texas 75248
www.aecom.com
February 11, 2011
Cathy Lancaster, President
Marshall Lancaster and Associates, Inc.
1864 North Norwood Drive, Suite E
Hurst, Texas 76054
Subject: Additional Services Request No. 2—Field Surveying Services
Forest Park—Berry Storm Drain Watershed Planning Study (Phase 11)
City Secretary Contract No. 33129
Dear Mrs. Lancaster:
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. intends to contract with Marshall Lancaster and Associates,
Inc., for MWBE SERVICES on the referenced Forest Park—Berry Storm Drain Watershed Planning
Study(Phase 11). AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. intends to contract$47,300 to your firm for
structure, and cross-section survey. Please acknowledge this commitment by signing below and
returning two originals to our Dallas office (aft. Zubin Sukheswalla).
Sincerely, C
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cathy Lancaster, President
Marshall Lancaster and Associates, Inc.
Don D'Adam, P.E. 02/11/2011
Vice President Date
c: Project file 1.2
M&C Review Page 1 of 2
Official site of the City of Fort Worth,Texas
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Fo�H
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 6/14/2011
DATE: 6/14/2011 REFERENCE NO.: **C-24964 LOG NAME: 20SWMZOOCREEK
CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC NO
HEARING:
SUBJECT: Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 2 to the Engineering Agreement with AECOM USA
Group, Inc., for the Forest Park-Berry Storm Drain Watershed Planning Study in the
Amount of$279,700.00, Thereby, Revising the Total Contract Cost to
$925,200.00 (COUNCIL DISTRICT 9)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize execution of Amendment No. 2 to the engineering
agreement with AECOM USA Group, Inc., for the Forest Park-Berry Storm Drain Watershed Planning
Study in the amount of$279,700.00, thereby, revising the total contract cost to $925,200.00.
DISCUSSION:
A drainage improvement study is currently underway to identify feasible options to address flooding
in the area east and southeast of TCU which all drains north into Zoo Creek. The scope of work in
this amendment includes a detailed study of the stream to reflect current conditions, identifying
erosion repair and other minor projects, and includes development of a long-range improvement plan
for Zoo Creek to reduce flooding throughout the area.
On January 10, 2006, (M&C C-21238) the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an
engineering agreement with Turner Collie& Braden, Inc., in the amount of$215,500.00 (City
Secretary Contract No. 33129) for the original study which documented severe drainage capacity
deficiencies in the existing Forest Park-Berry storm drain system and recommended possible
solutions. On September 16, 2008, (M&C C-23048) the City Council authorized the City Manager to
execute Amendment No.1 (City Secretary Contract No. 37680) to this study in the amount of
$430,000.00, to investigate several additional improvement alternatives. Turner, Collie & Braden,
Inc., has since become part of their parent company, AECOM USA Group, Inc. The parties have
executed a valid assignment of the contract acceptable to staff.
AECOM USA Group, Inc., proposes to perform this study for a lump-sum fee of$279,700.00. City
staff considers this fee to be fair and reasonable for the scope of services proposed, based on the
size of the watershed and length of the stream. The original study was funded by the 2004 Capital
Improvement Project(CIP). Amendment No. 1 and the current amendment are using Storm Water
Utility funds.
AECOM USA Group, Inc., is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance by committing to an
additional 17 percent M/WBE participation on this Amendment No. 2. The City's goal on this
amendment is 17 percent.
This project is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 9.
FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION:
The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current operating
budget, as appropriated, of the Stormwater Utility Fund.
TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers
http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=15105&councildate=6/14/2011 12/2/2011
M&C Review Page 2 of 2
PE69 531200 0209202 $279.700.00
Submitted for City Manager's Office by Fernando Costa (6122)
Originating Department Head: Greg Simmons (7862)
Additional Information Contact: Steve Eubanks (7857)
ATTACHMENTS
Zoo Creek Location Map.ipa
http://apps.cfwnet.org/counciLpacket/mc_review.asp?ID=15105&councildate=6/14/2011 12/2/2011