HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 35274-A5 (2) CITY SECRETARY
cowwr too. -7--7�l�a ss
AMENDMENT No.5
TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT No. 3-5'�
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth (CITY) and AECOM, (ENGINEER) made
and entered into City Secretary Contract No. 35274, (the CONTRACT) which
was authorized by M&C C-22038 on the 3rd day of April, 2007 in the amount
of $ 128, 780; and
WHEREAS, the CONTRACT was subsequently revised by: Amendment Number
1 in the amount of $19, 470 which was administratively authorized on May
8, 2008, Amendment Number 2 in the amount of $68, 263 which was authorized
by M&C # C-23774 on September 15, 2009, Amendment Number 3 in the amount
of $128, 829 which was authorized by M&C # C-24687 on February 11, 2011,
Amendment Number 4 in the amount of $38, 777 which was administratively
authorized on October 19, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the CONTRACT involves engineering services for the
following project:
Milam-Rohinhood, Far East Fort Worth Drainage and Wilbarger-Hughes
Storm Drain Extension, Project No. 00482; and
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to execute Amendment No. 5 to the
CONTRACT to include an increased scope of work and revised fee.
NOW THEREFORE, CITY and ENGINEER, acting herein by and through their
duly authorized representatives, enter into the following agreement,
which amends the CONTRACT:
1.
Article I of the CONTRACT is amended to include the additional
engineering services specified in a proposal dated Jane 14, 2013, a copy
of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. The cost to City
for the additional design services to be performed by Engineer totals
$9, 700. (See Attached Funding Breakdown Sheet, Page -3-)
err
rn
Cl) 2.
m
Z
C=) Article II of the CONTRACT is amended to provide for an increase in
A the fee to be paid to Engineer for all work and services performed under
the Contract, as amended, so that the total fee paid by the City for all
work and services shall be an amount of $393, 819. 00.
6
y
City of Fort Worth p
Professional Services Agreement Amendment Template OFFICIAL.RECORD
PMO Official Release 8/1/2012
Page 1 of 3 CITY SECRETARY'
FT.WORTH,TX
3 .
All other provisions of the Contract, which are not expressly
amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect.
EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE as of the date last written by a signatory,
below.
APPROVED:
City of Fort Worth ENGINEER
AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Fernando Costa Don D'Adam
Assistant City Manager Vice President
DATE: DATE:
APPROVA RECOMMENDED: J
GSJ &j
C -J
Douglas W. iersig, P.E.
Director, Transportation/Pu lic Works Department
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: M&C: ►tI ^
Date:
Doug as W. Black
Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST: FORT
0
�r6
Mary J. a r V
City Secretary °
0
tX
City of Fort worth EOFFICIALECORDProfessional Services Agreement Amendment TemplatePMO Official Release 8/1/2012 ETARYPage 2 of 3H,TX
FUNDING BREAKDOWN SHEET
City Secretary No. 35247
Amendment No. 5
Department Fund-Account-Center Amount
TPW P227 531200 2052800482 30 $9, 700 . 00
Total : $9, 700 . 00
City of Fort Worth
Professional Services Agreement Amendment Template
PMO Official Release 8/1/2012
Page 3of3
P'ZCOM AECOM 972 735 3000 tel
16000 Dallas Parkway 972 735 3001 fax
Suite 350
Dallas,Texas 75248
www.aecom.com
June 14, 2013
Mr. Michael Perkins, PE, CFM
City of Fort Worth
900 Monroe Street, Suite 404
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Subject: Project No. 00482
Storm Water Utilities—Far East Drainage Improvements
Additional Services Request#5
Dear Mr. Perkins:
Please accept this request for additional services in response to our recent discussions on June 5,
2013 regarding the Far East Drainage Improvements Project. AECOM has been requested to
perform additional services outside the current scope of work to address additional items that have
developed since the 90% submittal in May 2011. Following is a summary of tasks considered to be
additional services along with a breakdown of fees. Per our contract, we respectfully request
approval of the additional scope and fee in order to close out the contract as discussed in our meeting
on June 5, 2013.
1.0 WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE DESIGN
The City requested evaluation of potential for the installation of water quality structure(s)(WQS)on
the proposed storm drain system for purposes of trash/debris control and removal. Locations for
potential WQS's have been evaluated by AECOM, providing the following services in support of the
design of these structures:
• Review design parameters for SNOUT as provided by manufacturer, and develop size and
location of water quality structure(s);
■ Coordinate with City and manufacturer on design details.
2.0 SYSTEM OUTFALL -ALTERNATE OUTFALL CONCEPTS
The current system outfall design, as submitted to the City in May 2011, consists of approximately
130 linear feet(LF)of 60-inch RCP and 100 LF of 7'x5' RCB, with an energy dissipater structure at
the outlet and three(3)grade control structures in the downstream channel to protect against erosive
velocities. Based on input from homeowners in the project area and our meeting with the City on
March 28, 2012, outfall design alternates have been prepared such that the enclosed system is
extended an additional 700 LF+/-to an existing pond located within the City of Arlington. Three (3)
alternate design concepts were developed for the original alignment as follows:
1. Extend RCB to existing pond with outlet structure discharge elevation at or above normal
water elevation of the pond.
2. Extend RCB to existing pond in buried condition with outlet structure to be constructed in
submerged condition as required to avoid existing water and sewer utilities located along
pond embankment.
3. Develop outfall alternate that extends a buried closed conduit system to just west of the
existing sewer and water utilities. Alternate to include"bubble-up"outlet structure to the west
of the utilities with a reduced capacity closed conduit system that extends to discharge at or
above normal pool elevation of the existing pond.
►a OM
Mr. Michael Perkins, PE, CFM
June 14, 2013
Page 2
3.0 GRETA LANE REALIGNMENT CONCEPT
AECOM was requested by the City to develop an alignment concept that evaluated the feasibility of
relocating the project outfall from its current location, to an alignment within Greta Lane. AECOM
prepared a concept plan and profile sheet of the Greta Lane alignment based on existing utilities and
easements in the area. In addition,AECOM was requested to support the City in obtaining a
temporary right-of-entry(ROE)from the property owner at 2113 Greta Lane for purposes of
performing a field review of the concept alignment. This included the following:
• Prepare temporary ROE letter and agreement based on templates provided by the City;
• Prepare ROE exhibit in support of the agreement;
• Coordinate with City on comments provided by property owner on agreement, including
review of indemnification language requested by the property owner.
COMPENSATION
Services for the scope of services described above will be provided for a Lump Sum basis fee of
$9,708 in accordance with the terms and conditions of the existing agreement for services dated April
3, 2007. The proposed fee is based on fee breakdown provided in the task summary below and in
the attached "Exhibit A" and is inclusive of required basic services.
A summary of the total project fee is as follows:
Basic Fee Date Total MIWBE Percent
1. Original Contract 04/03/2007 $128,780 $32,080 24.9%
2. Amendment#1 05/08/2008 $19,470 $17,700 90.9%
3. Amendment 42 09/15/2009 $68,253 $10,100 14.8%
4. Amendment#3 02/11/2011 $128,829 $18,174 14.1%
5. Amendment#4 10/19/2011 $38,777 $0 0.0%
6. Amendment#5 (Current Request)
1.0 Water Quality Structure Design $2,295
2.0 System Outfall—Alternate Outfall Concepts $4,145
3.0 Greta Lane Realignment Concept $3,260
Total Amendment#5 $9,700 $0 0.0%
TOTAL BUDGET $393,819 $78,054 *19.8%
'Note:The original City MIWBE participation goal was 22%.
We appreciate the opportunity to continue our work on this project with you. Should you have any
questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Greg Crews at
972.735.3031.
Sincerely,
f
Don D'Adam, PE Greg Crews, PE
Vice President Project Manager
Enclosures:
Exhibit A—Level of Effort Spreadsheet
§c /
- e.!]jJ2i
� j= :
,
� 2 ) �
7z ® o J
, kLoE
] R [ 72 �
CL
e « ■ � -
q) § o
mjo� mz
o /)
E � A27 6,05
CL
% = r
kk } =
o < ew
- 7 LL
Lu
twl
a )
§ ®
k (
rm}/
�
�f§ �!( m\® w;
772
_ )»k
/4§
ƒ!/
/�[