Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 35260CITY SECRETAf3y OONTRAUT NO. Q STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL BY THESE COUNTIES OF TARRANT § PRESENTS DENTON AND WISE § BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP REVOLVING LOAN FUND AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AND BLG NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT, L.P. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this day oP4�,-2007, by and between BLG Northside Development, L.P., hereinafter referred to as `Borrower," and the City of Fort Worth, a home -rule municipal corporation of the State of Texas, situated in the counties of Tarrant, Denton and Wise acting herein through Libby Watson, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager hereinafter referred to as "City". WITNES SETH: WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth is the recipient of Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Funds ("BCRLF") and authorized to make certain loans from these funds (the "Loan Funds"); and WHEREAS, these Loan Funds are to be used to undertake cleanup of Brownfields sites by making Iow interest loans to parties willing to undertake cleanup of these sites; WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005 the City Council authorized the execution of the Lease and Option Agreement concerning approximately 33 acres of land in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas with BLG Northside Development, L.P. (Contract No. 33411 M&C C20683); WHEREAS, the Property is an eligible Brownfields site; WHEREAS, the Property is not listed, or proposed for listing on the National Priorities List of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); WHEREAS, the Borrower is not a generator or transporter of the contamination at the site; WHEREAS, the Borrower is not and has never been subject to any penalties resulting from environmental non-compliance at or on the Property nor is the Borrower, or its Project contractors or subcontractors currently suspended, debarred, or otherwise declared ineligible for participation in this federal program or from the receipt of these funds; and WHEREAS, the Borrower is not responsible for the disposal or placement of hazardous substances and has not caused, contributed to, permitted, or exacerbated the release of a hazardous substance on, or emanating from the Property. 1 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises contained herein, City agrees to make the Loan to Borrower pursuant to this Agreement. 1. Definitions: In this Agreement, the following words and phrases shall be defined as follows: Approved Budget: shall mean the budget or cost itemization prepared by Borrower and approved by City specifying all costs associated with and for the cleanup of the Property which is attached hereto at Exhibit A. Brownfield Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund or BCRLF: shall mean that certain loan granted by the EPA under the authority of 40 C.F.R. Part 35, Subpart O and 40 C.F.R. Part 31, as accepted by the City on January 16, 2001 by M&C G-13129. City: shall mean the City of Fort Worth, Texas. EE/CA: shall mean Engineering Evaluation and Cost Analysis. EPA: shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Fund Manager: shall mean the Director of the City's Economic and Community Development Department or his designated representative. Governmental Authority: shall mean the United States, the State of Texas, the county, the City, or any other political subdivision in which the Property is located, and any other political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality exercising jurisdiction over Borrower or the Property. Governmental Requirements: shall mean all laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations of any Governmental Authority applicable to Borrower or the Property. Hard Cost(s): shall mean those costs incurred for the cleanup of all or a portion of the Property thereby increasing the value of the Property, as approved by the Department of Environmental Management (which such approval will not be unreasonably withheld or denied) to include but not be limited to costs associated with: sampling of existing groundwater monitoring wells, installation of new groundwater monitoring wells, soil sampling and analysis to gauge effectiveness of cleanup plan, trenching, impacted soil removal, transportation, and disposal, clean fill substitution, groundwater remediation through injection, in situ remediation, cost of chemicals used in remediation, cost of laboratory analysis, field expertise, field oversight, sample acquisition data review, report preparation, costs associated with Response Action Plan and Response Action Completion Report, QAPP costs, and erosion control measures if required by TCEQ and/or EPA. Lead Agency: shall mean the City's Environmental Management Department. 0a BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy a104.25.OW Lease and Option Agreement: shall mean the Lease Agreement and Option to Purchase between the City and the Borrower known as City Secretary Contract No. 33411 and all amendments to the Agreement. Loan: shall mean that amount of the Loan Funds actually loaned to Borrower pursuant to this Agreement and the Note. Loan Documents: shall mean this Agreement, the Note, a Deed of Trust (if applicable), any and all instruments, certificates, assignments, agreements, and such other instruments evidencing, securing, or executed in connection with the Loan which the parties agree to negotiate, in good faith, in the future. MSD. shall mean Municipal Setting Designation. Note: shall mean the promissory note executed by Borrower and payable to City, in a face amount which shall not exceed $800,000 and any and all renewals, extensions, modification and/or replacements thereof. Project: shall mean the cleanup of the Property, or a portion thereof, undertaken with funds provided by the Brownfield Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund. Project Area(s): shall mean the property as shown on the area commonly known as 600 N. Jones, consisting of sub -areas A, B, C, and D as shown on Exhibit C. Project Schedule: shall mean the schedule prepared by Borrower and approved by City specifying the Borrower's projected schedule for the cleanup of all or a portion of the Property. Property: shall -mean a portion of that property known as 600 N. Jones Street, Fort Worth, Texas, consisting only of sub -areas known as Project Areas A, B, C and D as shown on Exhibit C. RAP: shall mean the Remedial Action Plan cleanup for the Property as approved by the TCEQ which attached hereto as Exhibit D. Reimbursement: shall mean a disbursement by City of any of the Loan Funds pursuant to Article 4 of this Agreement. Soft Cost(s): shall mean those costs that are not Hard Costs associated with the cleanup of the Property which have a negligible positive impact on the value of the Property to include but not be limited to, engineering, legal, appraisal, survey, environmental, real estate consulting, title insurance and other professional fees, permit fees, developer fees, loan fees and other related fees and expenses supported by such evidence satisfactory to City. Site Manager: shall mean the Director of the City's Environmental Management 3 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy u104.25.07Y2 Department or his designated representative. TCEQ: shall mean the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 1. TERMS OF THE LOAN 1.1 Term. The Loan shall be for a term of fifteen (I5) years, more or less, beginning on the date of the Note. 1.2A Commitment: Reimbursement of Funds. Subject to the terms, covenants, and conditions herein set forth, City agrees to make Reimbursements, solely from the City of Fort Worth's Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund, for approved Hard Costs and eligible Soft Costs incurred by Borrower for the purpose of cleaning up the Property under this Agreement, in amounts designated by the Approved Budget and as approved by the Site Manager and Fund Manager, of which the aggregate amount shall not exceed $800,000 in accordance with the RAP. Borrower shall not be eligible for reimbursement for any cost other than those eligible as set forth in this Agreement or the Approved Budget. Allowable expenses for Reimbursement shall be as described in Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Upon completion of the entire Project, as determined by the City, Borrower may request Reimbursement from remaining Loan Funds for all Soft Costs incurred by Borrower but for which no Reimbursement has been made. The Reimbursement of Soft Costs shall be at the discretion of the City in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 1.213 Commitment: Use of Funds. The Borrower understands and agrees that except as provided herein, all Reimbursements provided by City shall be for Hard Costs incurred by Borrower to cleanup the Property, or a portion thereof, in accordance with the approved RAP and Approved Budget. No Reimbursement shall be made to the Borrower without the written confirmation from the Site Manager and the Borrower's Licensed Environmental Professional that the work, as designated by the RAP, for which Borrower is requesting Reimbursement, has been completed. The obligations of City to make Reimbursement(s) shall be subject to Article 4. 1.3 Accrual of Interest. The Loan shall bear interest at a rate of two percent (2%) per annum. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a year of 360 days. 1.4 Loan. Prior to the first Reimbursement of the Loan Funds, Borrower shall have received copies of the fully executed Loan Documents (which the parties, in good faith, agree to negotiate in the future) and evidence that the Loan has closed. Notwithstanding anything contained herein or in any other Loan Documents to the contrary, Borrower acknowledges and consents to the Loan in favor of the City under which, once the Borrower exercises its right to purchase all or a portion of the Property pursuant to the Lease and Option Agreement, the Delineated Property (as defined below), shall be security for the repayment of the Note. Furthermore, Borrower acknowledges that the lien and security interests on the Delineated Property shall at all times be first and superior and not subordinate nor inferior to any other the lien. 4 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 1.5 CERCLA. The Borrower will carry out the Project in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation. and Liability Act (CERCLA) in (42 USC 9601 et seq.); Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to States and Local Governments (40 CFR Part 31); Cooperative Agreements for Superfund Response Actions (40 CFR Part 35, Subpart O); the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) (40 Part 300) and all other applicable provisions of federal, state or local law. The Borrower shall carry out the Project in accordance with the Davis -Bacon Act of 1931 (CERCLA 104(g)(1), 40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5 and 42 U.S.C. 3222). CERCLA compliance with Davis Bacon requires payment of Federal prevailing wage rates for construction, repair or alteration work funded in whole or in part with BCRLF Loan Funds. The Borrower must obtain recent and applicable wage rates from the U.S. Department of Labor and incorporate them into the construction contract. Borrower shall comply with all other cross cutting requirements of the EPA, including but not limited to those identified in Exhibit E. The parties agree that the requirements of this Section 1.5 shall be applicable to Borrower only to the extent that same are actual requirements imposed by the EPA as a condition to obtaining the Loan Funds. 1.6 Time to Start. Borrower shall commence cleanup on the Project within thirty (30) days from the date of the full and complete execution of this Agreement and the related Loan Documents, and shall complete and perform all work on the Project within one (1) year of the date that on -site cleanup activity is initiated by Borrower, in accordance with the RAP and Project Schedule, unless the U.S. EPA determines that the cleanup may continue consistent with CERCLA §104(c)(1) and the National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR §300.415(b)(5) and the Borrower submits such determination in writing to the City. If at any time after the commencement of the cleanup of the Project, Borrower determines that: (1) the cost to complete Project Area D actually exceeds or, in Borrower's estimation, will exceed $450,000; (2) the cost to complete Project Areas B and C actually exceeds or, in Borrower's estimation, will exceed $250,000; or (3) the cost to complete the entire Project actually exceeds or, in Borrower's estimation, will exceed $800,000, Borrower may terminate all activity related to the cleanup of the Project, as more particularly described in Section 2.6.1, and such termination shall not be deemed a default of this Agreement or the Loan Documents. 1.7 Payments to City. No payments shall be made on the Note in years one (1) through five (5) however interest shall accrue annually. Payment shall begin on the sixth (6th) year, with interest amortized and accruing thereafter. The Note payments shall be made directly to the City of Fort Worth. Note payments are due on the first (1st) of the month with a late fee of five percent (5%) of the payment due for any payment received on or after the sixth (6th) day of the month. The parties acknowledge that the Borrower may at any time prepay the indebtedness represented by the Note without the prior written consent of any party. Reimbursement requests should be mailed to the following address: City of Fort Worth Economic and Community Development Department 5 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy crl04.25.M2 FYI Attn: Brownfield Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, TX. 76102 2. CLEANUP OF THE PROPERTY; PROJECT SCHEDULE 2.1 Property; Project Areas. The Property shall be divided into delineated areas known as Project Areas A, B, C, and D (see Exhibit C). 2.2 Schedule of Reimbursements. 2.2.1 MSD Reimbursement. City agrees that upon the closing of the Loan and approval of Borrower's request, the City shall make a one-time Reimbursement to the Borrower for the eligible Hard Costs and Soft Costs incurred by Borrower to obtain a MSD on the Property, in an amount not to exceed $90,000. Borrower shall submit all receipts and documentation as requested by the Site Manager and/or Fund Manager prior to such Reimbursement. The parties agree that all eligible amounts expended by Borrower in obtaining the MSD which are not reimbursed pursuant hereto may be reimbursed by the City upon completion of the entire Project, provided that: (1) there are remaining Loan Funds available; (2) that the requirements of this Agreement are met; and (3) the Borrower has completed cleanup of the entire Project. 2.2.2 Project Area A. Upon receiving a final Certificate of Completion ("COC") from the TCEQ for Project Area A, the City shall make a one-time Reimbursement to the Borrower for the eligible Hard Costs and Soft Costs incurred to obtain the COC for Project Area A in an amount not to exceed $10,000. Borrower shall submit all receipts and documentation as requested by the Site Manager and/or Fund Manager prior to such Reimbursement. The parties agree that all eligible amounts expended by Borrower in obtaining the COC from the TCEQ for Project Area A which are not reimbursed pursuant hereto may be reimbursed by the City upon completion of the entire Project, provided that: (1) there are remaining Loan Funds available; (2) that the requirements of this Agreement are met; and (3) the Borrower has completed cleanup of the entire Project. 2.2.3 Project Areas B, C, and D. City agrees to make Reimbursements for the Hard Costs incurred by Borrower and approved by the City, for the cleanup of Project Areas B, C, or D, up to the amounts stated in Section 2.3. Pursuant to other provisions in this Agreement, if the Hard Costs incurred by Borrower to achieve a COC for Project Areas B, C and D are less than the amounts designated in Section 2.3, then upon receiving a final COC from TCEQ for each Project Area, the Borrower may submit a request for the Reimbursement of its Soft Costs from such remaining funds which were designated for that particular Project Area. City shall not unreasonably deny such request so long as the Borrower submits a copy of the final COC. 2.3 Project Area Cost. Reimbursement of Hard Costs for cleanup activity on the Property shall be limited to four hundred fifty thousand dollars ($450,000) for Project Area D and two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for Project Area B and C combined. 0 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy M04.25.07v2 2.4 Sub -phases. Work on each Project Area shall be further broken down into project phases and approved by the Site Manager prior to commencement of any cleanup activity. Work on each Project Area shall be completed before commencing cleanup efforts on another Project Area. However, Borrower may submit a written request to the Site Manager to simultaneously perform work on more than one Project Area if that work could provide for cost savings, i.e. the trenching of the Project Areas. City shall not unreasonably deny such request. Borrower shall submit to the Site Manager a Project Schedule for approval prior to beginning any work on the Property in accordance with the approved RAP. 2.5 Modification to Project Schedule and Approved Budget. All changes or modification to the Project Schedule or the Approved Budget shall be subject to written approval by the Site Manager prior to such change or modification becoming effective, which will not be unreasonably withheld. In the event that Borrower discovers that the cost to complete the cleanup of the Project will exceed the costs allocated to the Project or Project Areas (as identified in Section 2.3 above), in lieu of terminating its cleanup activities pursuant to Section 1.6 and 2.6.1, Borrower may revise the RAP (with the approval of TCEQ) and/or Project Schedule and submit such revision(s) to the Site Manager for approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 2.6 Cost to Complete: 2.6.1 Grounds for Termination. If, after the commencement of the Project, the Borrower determines that: (1) the cost to complete Project Area D actually exceeds or, in Borrower's estimation, will exceed $450,000; (2) the cost to complete Project Areas B and C actually exceeds or, in Borrower's estimation, will exceed $250,000; or (3) the cost to complete the entire Project actually exceeds or, in Borrower's estimation, will exceed $800,000, Borrower may terminate all activities related to the cleanup of the Project upon written notice to the City. Such notice shall include a verification, projection, estimate, etc. from the Borrower's Licensed Environmental Professional, which supports Borrower's election to terminate the Project pursuant hereto. Upon receipt by the City of such notice, and the expiration of fourteen (14) days, Borrower may cease and terminate all cleanup activities related to the Property and Borrower's election shall not be deemed an event of default, provided the Borrower has complied with this Section 2.6.1. Further, the parties agree that should Borrower elect to terminate the Project pursuant to this Section, Borrower shall be entitled to a Reimbursement for its Hard Costs and, if a COC is obtained for a particular Project Area, its Soft Costs in accordance with this Agreement. 2.6.2 Effects of Termination to the Lease and Option Agreement, Default of Lease and Option Agreement. If Borrower defaults under the terms of this Agreement, Borrower agrees that the City shall have the right to deny the exercise by Borrower of any option to purchase property under the Lease and Option Agreement until such default is cured. Furthermore, the City and Borrower agree that if the Borrower ceases cleanup of the Project prior to completion, Borrower's right to receive a credit against the purchase price for all or a portion of the Property for the Hard Costs and Soft Costs incurred in the acquisition of the MSD or the cleanup of the Property (per the Lease and Option 7 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 Agreement) shall cease unless such termination is made pursuant to Sections 1.6 and 2.6.1 of this Agreement. Both parties agree that the termination of this Agreement by Borrower in compliance with Sections 1.6 and 2.6.1, shall not diminish: (1) Borrower's ability to purchase all or a portion of the Property in accordance with the Lease and Option Agreement; or (2) Borrower's right to receive a credit for those amounts expended by Borrower in connection with the Project, as more particularly described in the Lease and Option Agreement. 2.7 Compliance. The Borrower further understands and agrees that any and all work performed on the Property for which Loan Funds are used for Reimbursement under this Agreement is conditioned upon the Borrower's full compliance with all applicable laws and this Agreement. 3. ADDITIONAL BORROWER DUTIES 3.1 Sign on Property. The Borrower shall erect a sign on the Project site stating that the Project is being financed in part by the BCRLF and the City and providing the appropriate contacts for obtaining information on activities being conducted at the site and for reporting suspected criminal activities. The sign erected on the Project site shall comply with all requirements of the state and local law applicable to on -premise outdoor advertising as well as 40 CFR Subpart O §35.6105(a)(2)(ii). 3.2 Cleanup Closeout Report. Borrower shall notify the City when each Project Area is complete. The notice shall contain documentation as necessary to prepare a Cleanup Closeout Report developed in accordance with Section 300.165 of the NCP and all applicable EPA guidance. This report shall summarize the actions taken, the resources committed and the problems encountered in completion of the project, if any. No Soft Cost as eligible for Reimbursement under this Agreement may be made until the City has received: (1) Borrower's notice that the specific Project Area is complete; and (2) a copy of the final and complete Cleanup Closeout Report with respect to the Project Area completed. 3.3 Demolition of Building and Structures. The Borrower shall not demolish any part of the buildings or structures located on the Property or commit any waste except as provided in the Scope of Work without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. 3.4 Permits and Fees. Borrower, at its sole cost and expense, shall be responsible for obtaining all permits, licenses, approvals, certifications and inspections required by federal, state or local law and to maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, certifications and inspections in current status during the term of this Agreement. The parties agree that all amounts expended by Borrower pursuant to this Section shall be designated as Soft Costs, and may be reimbursed by City provided that the requirements of this Agreement are met and there are remaining Loan Funds available. 3.5 Performance Bond. Borrower shall require its contractors to acquire and maintain a BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 performance bond while performing any and all work for the cleanup of the Property. 4. REIMBURSEMENTS 4.1 Obligation to Make Reimbursements. The obligation of City to make Reimbursements shall be limited to once per month and each Reimbursement is subject to the accuracy of all representations and warranties of Borrower in this Agreement on the date of this Agreement and the performance by Borrower under the Loan Documents. 4.2 Conditions to Reimbursements. City shall have no obligations to make a Reimbursement to Borrower for the cleanup of the Property, or a portion thereof, unless and until the following conditions have been satisfied: a. Borrower shall submit a written request for Reimbursement for the actual Hard Costs and eligible Soft Costs incurred for the cleanup of the Property in accordance with the Approved Budget and RAP. The parties agree that the Hard Costs incurred in the cleanup of each Project Area will be eligible for reimbursement immediately after said Hard Costs are incurred by Borrower, however the City shall not be required to make Reimbursements more than once per month. b. Borrower shall submit those receipts and verifications which are supplied by the Borrower's contractor(s) and/or subcontractor(s) in connection with the Project, upon the request by the Fund Manager or Site Manager. C. Borrower shall submit documentation identifying the Borrower's contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) for the Project and assurance, as requested by the City, that the Borrower is in compliance with and meets the goals of the EPA's 40 CFR §35.6580 to give opportunities for qualified Small Business Enterprises (SBE), Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) and Women -Owned Business Enterprises (WBE) to submit proposals, bids, and provide services on contracts and subcontracts for services and supplies. d. Borrower shall submit affidavits evidencing payment of all contractors and material suppliers who provide labor and material for the Project, or a portion thereof, and other documentation as needed, as reasonably determined by the Fund Manager, that Borrower has made payment in full to the Borrower's contractors. The City shall not advance nor be obligated to make Reimbursement to the Borrower prior to the receipt of such documentation. e. Borrower shall submit a Release and Waiver of Lien and Indemnity Agreement, on a form provided by the City, executed by each contractor who provided labor or materials for the Project, or a portion thereof. f. Borrower shall submit an executed certificate that Borrower is not in default under any of the Loan Documents and that all representations and warranties of 0 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 Borrower contained in any such Loan Documents remain accurate, true, and correct. g. Borrower shall submit such other items as City shall reasonably require. h. No Event of Default or any event or circumstance which could, with the passage of time or the giving of notice or both, constitute an Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing. 5. LEASE AND OPTION AGREEMENT If the Borrower exercises its option to purchase the Property, either in its entirety or in smaller parcels, pursuant to the Lease and Option Agreement, then Borrower shall either: (1) immediately repay the Loan; or (2) as full collateral, place as security for the Loan a clearly delineated parcel of Property, as improved by the Borrower, with a value equal to or greater than the amount of the Loan ("Delineated Property"). City shall have a first lien on the Delineated Property which shall not be subordinate to any other lien or obligation. The City and Borrower agree that the Borrower may substitute the Delineated Property with any other property owned by Borrower, so long as the value of the replacement parcel is equal to the amount of the Loan. The City and Borrower further agree that if the Borrower elects to substitute the Delineated Property with another property owned by the Borrower, the City shall have a first lien on the substituted property which shall not be subordinate to any other lien or obligation. If the City and Borrower are unable to agree upon the value of any proposed Delineated Property or any replacement parcel, such disagreement shall be resolved by the following procedure. City shall provide Borrower a list of approved appraisers containing the names of a minimum of three (3) MAI appraisers acceptable to City. Borrower will then be entitled to select the appraiser from the list of approved appraisers provided by City. City, Borrower and the selected appraiser shall negotiate mutually agreeable terms with regard to the appraisal fee and parameters for the appraisal. City will then contract directly with the selected appraiser, but Borrower shall be solely responsible for paying the appraiser's fee directly to the appraiser. The selected appraiser shall determine a per square foot fair market value for the proposed Delineated Property with consideration of all relevant matters affecting the Premises. 6. REPRESENTATIONS Borrower represents that each of the following statements is true: 6.1 Organization and Status. Borrower is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its organization, has all power and authority to conduct its business as presently conducted, and is duly qualified to do business and in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the nature of its business makes qualification desirable. 10 %�'viGta BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 6.2 Financial Statements. All financial statements delivered to City are complete and correct and fairly present, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Borrower as of the dates and for the periods indicated. No material adverse change has occurred in the assets, liabilities, financial condition, business or affairs of Borrower since the dates of such financial statements. Borrower is not subject to any agreement materially and adversely affecting its financial condition, business or affairs. 6.3 Enforceability. The Loan Documents (which the parties, in good faith, agree negotiate in the future) will be legal, valid and binding obligations of the Borrower enforceable in accordance with their respective terms. The execution, delivery and performance of the Loan Documents will be duly authorized by all necessary action; will be within the power and authority of the Borrower; and the organizational documents of the Borrower or any agreement or instrument binding or affecting the Borrower or any of their respective property. 6.4 Litigation. Except as previously disclosed to City in writing, there is no litigation or administrative proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of Borrower, threatened against, nor any outstanding judgment, order or decree affecting Borrower before or by any Governmental Authority. 6.5 Borrower's Permits Licenses etc. Borrower possesses or will obtain all permits, licenses, patents, trademarks and copyrights required to conduct its business. 6.6 Securities Act of 1933. Neither Borrower nor any agent acting for it has offered the Note or any similar obligation of Borrower for sale to or solicited any offers to buy the Note or any similar obligation of Borrower from any person other than City, and neither Borrower nor any agent acting for it will tape any action which would subject the sale of the Note to the provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 6.7 Environmental. Borrower, as of the date of this Agreement, has not generated, handled, used, stored or disposed of any hazardous or toxic waste or substance, on or off the Property, other than in accordance with applicable Governmental Requirements. Borrower does not have any material contingent liability for non-compliance with environmental or hazardous waste laws. Borrower has not received any notice that it or any of its property or operations does not comply with, or that any Governmental Authority is investigating its compliance with, any environmental or hazardous waste laws. 6.8 Liens. If the Borrower exercises its rights under the Lease and Option Agreement, and Borrower, as provided herein, designates a particular parcel of property to serve as security for the repayment of the Note, Borrower agrees that it will not create or permit to exist any liens upon such Delineated Property or substitute property which are or shall be superior to the City's lien. 7. LOAN CLOSING The closing of this Loan shall be subject to: 11 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy ea104.25.07v2 a. Opinion of the Borrower's counsel that the Borrower, if a corporation, is in good standing and that all documents executed by the Borrower are valid and enforceable. b. Written authorization in the form of a resolution, if a corporation, authorizing the loan to the Borrower and authorizing Borrower's representative to execute the loan documents on behalf of the Borrower. 8. EVENT OF DEFAULT 8.1 Events of Default. In the event of a default of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement then, in that event, the entire outstanding principal balance amount of the Note shall become immediately due and payable without the necessity of demand from City. The Borrower shall be deemed to be in default under this Agreement upon the occurrence of any or more of the following events: a. Any material representation or warranty made herein or in any report, certificate, financial statement or other instrument furnished in connection with this Agreement or the Loan Documents shall prove to be false in any material respect; b. The Borrower ceases and/or fails to complete the cleanup of the Project except as provided for in Sections 1.6 and 2.6.1; c. The Borrower assigns or transfers this Agreement or any interest herein to a third party without the prior written consent of the City pursuant to Section 14.1; d. The Borrower fails to pay to the City any principal amount, fee, or interest on the Note after the same shall become due and payable and such failure continues beyond ten (10) business days; The Borrower defaults in the performance of any material term, covenant or condition to be performed hereunder (except for the obligation to pay any principal amount, fee, or interest on the Note, which shall be governed by subsection (d) above) and such default is not remedied within thirty (30) days, unless a longer period of time is reasonably required to cure the default, from and after written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, from the City to the Borrower, specifying said default, or, if such default cannot be remedied within that period, and remedial effort is not commenced within that period and diligently and continuously pursued, the City shall have the right to proceed by appropriate judicial proceedings to enforce performance or observation of the applicable provisions of this Agreement and/or terminate this Agreement and recover damages from the Borrower to the extent allowed by law; f. Any proceeding involving the Borrower or the Property, commenced under any bankruptcy or reorganization arrangement, probate, insolvency, readjustment of debt, dissolution or liquidation law of the United States, or any state, but if such proceedings are instituted, no event of default shall be deemed to have occurred hereunder unless 12 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy a104.25.07v2 the Borrower either approves, consents to, or acquiesces in such proceedings, or such proceedings are not dismissed within sixty (60) days; or g. An order, judgment or decree is entered, without the application, approval or consent of the Borrower, by any court of competent jurisdiction approving the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator of the Borrower of all or a substantial part of its assets, and such order, judgment or decree shall continue in effect for a period of sixty (60) days. 8.2 Loan Due. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the events of default enumerated herein, all indebtedness of the Borrower to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall become due and payable, both as to the principal and to the interest, if any, without presentment, demand, protest or notice of any kind to the Borrower, all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower. 9. REMEDIES 9.1 No remedy, right or power of City is exclusive of any other remedy, right or power now or later existing by contract, law, in equity, or otherwise. All remedies, rights and powers are cumulative. 9.2 Any forbearance by the City with respect to any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall in no way constitute a waiver of any of City's rights or privileges granted hereunder. 9.3 No failure of either party to exercise any power or right given it hereunder or to insist on strict compliance by the other party with its obligations hereunder, and so custom of practice of the parties at variance with the terms hereof shall constitute a waiver of the other party's right to demand at any time exact compliance with the terms hereof. 10. RECORDS 10.1 Maintenance of Records. The Borrower agrees to maintain financial and programmatic records pertaining to all matters relative to this Agreement in accordance with sound accounting practices and procedures and to retain all of its records and supporting documentation applicable to this Agreement for a period of ten (10) years except as follows: a. Records that are subject to audit findings shall be retained five (5) years after such findings have been resolved. b. All such records and supporting documents shall be made available, upon request, for inspection or audit by the City or its representatives. 10.2 Inspection by City. The Borrower agrees to permit the City or its designated representative to inspect and/or audit its records and books relative to this Agreement at any time during 13 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy criO4.25.07v2 normal business hours and under reasonable circumstances and to copy there from any information that the City desires relevant to this Agreement. The City shall provide written notice to the Borrower prior to the execution of this provision. The Borrower agrees to deliver the records or have the records delivered to the City or its designated representative at an address designated by such party within the City. If the City or its representative finds that the records delivered by the Borrower are incomplete, the Borrower agrees to pay the City or its representative's costs to travel to the Borrower's office or other location where the books or records are located to audit or retrieve the complete records. In addition, the Borrower agrees that loan related documents are subject to 40 C.F.R. 35.610. 11. INSURANCE Borrower shall require by contract its contractors to have insurance as detailed below. Contractor must supply certificates of insurance in compliance with the terms below to the Site Manager fifteen (15) days of prior to beginning work in each Project Area. 11.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate 11.2 Automobile Liability Insurance A. Coverage on vehicles involved in the work performed under this Agreement: $1,000,000 per accident on a combined single limit basis or: $500,000 bodily injury each person; $500,000 bodily injury each accident; and $250,000 property damage. B. Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist: $20,000 bodily injury each person; $40,000 bodily injury each accident; and $15,000 property damage each accident. The named insured and employees of Borrower's Contractor shall be covered under this policy. The City of Fort Worth shall be named an Additional insured on Endorsement TE 9901 or equivalent, as its interests may appear. Liability for damage occurring while loading, unloading and transporting materials collected under the Contract shall be included under this policy. 11.3 Worker's Compensation Coverage A: statutory limits Coverage B: $100,000 each accident $500,000 disease - policy limit $100,000 disease - each employee. 11.4 Environmental Impairment Liability (EIL) and/or Pollution Liability - $2,000,000 per occurrence. EIL coverage(s) must be included in policies listed in subsections 1 and 2 above; or, such insurance shall be provided under separate policy(s). Liability for damage 14 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cxao4.25.07v2 occurring while loading, unloading and transporting materials collected under the contract shall be included under the Automobile Liability insurance or other policy(s). 11.5 Pollution Legal Liability Policy. In a form approved by the Borrower and the City. 11.6 _Other Requirement. Certificates of insurance evidencing that the contractor has obtained all required insurance shall be delivered to the City prior to proceeding with the any cleanup activity. 11.6.1. Applicable policies shall be endorsed to name the City and Borrower as Additional Insured thereon, as its interests may appear. The term City shall include its employees, officers, officials, agents, and volunteers as respects the contracted services. 11.6.2. Certificate(s) of insurance shall document that insurance coverage specified according to items in section (a) above are provided under applicable policies documented thereon. 11.6.3. Any failure on part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements. 11.6.4. A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material change in coverage shall be provided to the City. A ten (10) days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. Such terms shall be endorsed onto Contractor's insurance policies. Notice shall be sent to Brian Boerner, Director, Department of Environmental Management, City of Fort Worth, 1000 Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. 11.6.5. Insurers for all policies must be authorized to do business in the state of Texas or be otherwise approved by the City; and, such insurers shall be acceptable to the City in terms of their financial strength and solvency. 1 L6.6. Deductible limits, or sell -insured retentions, affecting insurance required herein shall be acceptable to the City in its sole discretion; and, in lieu of traditional insurance, any alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups must be also approved. Dedicated financial resources or letters of credit may also be acceptable to the City. 11.6.7. Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City and Borrower. 11.6.8. The City shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring expense, to review the contractor's insurance policies including endorsements thereto and, at the City's discretion, the contractor may be required to provide proof of insurance premium payments. 11.6.9. The Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall have no exclusions by 15 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy crl04.25.070 endorsements unless the City approves such exclusions. 11.6.10. Neither the City nor Borrower shall be responsible for the direct payment of any insurance premiums required by the contract. It is understood that insurance cost is an allowable component of contractor's overhead. 11.6.11. All insurance required above shall be written on an occurrence basis in order to be approved by the City. 12. MWBE REQUIREMENTS The Borrower will comply with the statutes prohibiting discrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex and disability. In addition, the Borrower will undertake good faith efforts in compliance with 40 CFR §35.6580 to give opportunities for qualified Small Business Enterprises (SBE), Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) and Women - Owned Business Enterprises (WBE) to submit proposals, bids, and provide services on contracts and subcontracts for services and supplies. The Borrower shall submit a report of such efforts on the City -provided form. 13. INDEMNITY 13.1 RELEASE OF CITY LIABILITY. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT NOT PROHIBITED BY APPLICABLE LAW FROM TIME TO TIME IN EFFECT, BORROWER HEREBY KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY (AND AFTER IT HAS CONSULTED WITH ITS OWN ATTORNEY) IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGREES THAT NO CLAIM MAY BE MADE BY BORROWER AGAINST CITY OR ANY OF ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, ATTORNEYS, ACCOUNTANTS, AGENTS OR INSURERS ("INDEMNIFIED PARTIES"), OR ANY OF ITS OR THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN RESPECT OF ANY BREACH OR WRONGFUL CONDUCT (WHETHER THE CLAIM IS BASED ON CONTRACT OR TORT OR DUTY IMPOSED BY LAW) ARISING OUT OF, OR RELATED TO, THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY ANY OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE NOTE OR LOAN DOCUMENTS, OR ANY ACT, OMISSION, OR EVENT OCCURRING IN CONNECTION HEREWITH OR THEREWITH. IN FURTHERANCE OF THE FOREGOING, BORROWER HEREBY WAIVES, RELEASES AND AGREES NOT TO SUE UPON ANY CLAIM FOR ANY SUCH DAMAGES, WHETHER OR NOT ACCRUED AND WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR SUSPECTED TO EXIST IN ITS FAVOR. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED IS INTENDED TO WAIVE OR RELEASE THE CITY FROM DIRECT ACTUAL DAMAGES AND EXPENSES INCURRED BY BORROWER AS A RESULT OF ANY BREACH OR WRONGFUL CONDUCT ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE LOAN DOCUMENTS. 16 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy er]04.25.07v2 13.2 Indemni . (a) Borrower and Borrower's contractors shall indemnify the Indemnified Parties from, and hold each of them harmless against, any and all losses, liabilities, claims or damages to which any of them may become subject, insofar as such Iosses, liabilities, claims or damages arise out of or result from (i) any actual or proposed use by Borrower of the proceeds of any extension of credit by the City hereunder or (ii) any investigations, litigation or proceeding (including any threatened investigation or proceeding) relating to the foregoing, and the Borrower shall reimburse the Indemnified Parties, upon demand for any expenses (including legal fees) reasonably incurred in connection with any such investigation or proceeding. 13.3 Survival of Rights. Without prejudice to the survival of any other obligations of the Borrower hereunder and the Note, the obligations of the Borrower under this Article 13 shall survive the termination of this Agreement and the payment or assignment of the Note. 14. ASSIGNMENT, SALE, OR TRANSFER 14.1 Assignment. The Borrower shall not assign or attempt to assign directly or indirectly, any of its rights under this Agreement or the Loan Documents without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld or denied. 14.2 Sale or Transfer of the Delineated Pro ert . The parties agree that the Borrower may assign, sell or transfer the Delineated Property; however, upon the occurrence of same, Borrower agrees that it will replace the Delineated Property with another parcel and the value of said replacement parcel shall be equal to the Loan Funds actually borrowed by Borrower pursuant to the Note, as more particularly described in Section 5 above. 15. NOTICES All notices, requests, instructions or other documents to be given hereunder to either party by the other shall be in writing and delivered personally or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Agreement. Any such notice, request, instruction or other document shall be conclusively deemed to have been received and be effective on the date on which personally delivered or, if sent by certified or registered mail, on the day mailed to the parties as follows: TO THE CITY: The Office of the City Manager The City of Fort Worth 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76102 The Director of Environmental Management The City of Fort Worth 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76102 17 '�;.F1'L BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr[04.25.07v2 With a copy to: City Attorney's Office The City of Fort Worth 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76102 TO THE BORROWER: BLG Northside Development, LP 301 NE 6th Street Fort Worth, Texas 76106 Attn. Carl Bell With a copy to: Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C. 301 Commerce Street, Suite 1500 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Attn: Michael V. Bourland or to such other address as a party may subsequently specify in writing to the other party. 16. MISCELLANEOUS 16.1 Third Party Rights. This Agreement is not intended to create or vest any rights in any third party or to create any third party beneficiaries. 16.2 Amendments. All amendments to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed upon, in writing and signed by both parties hereto. 16.3 Force Majeure. It is expressly understood that a failure or delay on the part of the Borrower in the performance, in whole or in part, or any of the terms of this Agreement, if such failure is attributable to an Act of God, fire, flood, riot, insurrection, embargo, emergency or governmental orders, regulations, priority, or other limitations or restrictions, or other similar unforeseen causes beyond the reasonable control of such party, the failure or delay shall not constitute a breach or default under this Agreement. 16.4 Full Force and Effect. This Agreement and all covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made herein shall survive the execution of this Agreement and shall continue in full force and effect so long as the Loan obligation is outstanding and unpaid. 16.5 Validity. If any provision or item of this Agreement is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or items of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or items, and to this end, the provisions of this Agreement are hereby declared severable. 16.6 Agreement Controlling. To the extent that any provision of the Loan Documents, which the parties, in good faith, agree to negotiate in the future, (other than this Agreement) are in direct conflict with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control and govern. In all other regards, all provisions of the Loan Documents are intended to be read and integrated in a harmonious and consistent manner, including 18 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 defined terms used herein and therein. 16.7 Integration. This Agreement, together with the Loan Documents, (which the parties, in good faith, agree negotiate in the future) will embody the entire agreement between the parties thereto relating to the subject matter hereof and thereof, and may be amended or supplemented only by an instrument in writing executed jointly by an authorized officer of City and Borrower. 16.8 Use of Property. The Borrower understands and agrees that any use of the Property or any activity thereon which is inconsistent with the foregoing provisions is expressly prohibited. 19 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr144.25.07Q IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be fully executed in triplicate, in the name and on behalf of each of them (acting individually or by their respective officers or appropriate legal representatives, as the case may be, hereunto duly authorized) as of the day and year first written above. WITNESSES: '�ETOMEJ OF SIGNATURE] [TYPE NAME OF SIGNATURE] ATTEST: Marty Hendri , City Secret4fy Approved as to form and legality NW & P. fiujt�-- . Christa Lopez Assistant City Attorney 18251406 Contract AuthorizatioR --L7—&K -u-1— — Date BLG Northside Development, L.P. By: BLG Northside Properties, LLC, its generall partner BY: Carl W. Bell, President CITY: City o orth BY: _ Libby(Watson, Assistant City Manager 20cef BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Exhibit A- Approved Budget BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy crt04.25.07v2 EXHIBIT "A" U A @ C 'D � C @ 3 T� U O C �y O U r- (n O di Q C a� 0 O _ 'In O U O (V lL. N U ~ C —O J dS E ON w >,O a) oQ c.2 o 0' U U ti oa c r c' of O c (O q� o o Ln a)m 0 c o C LO LO O in A 9 ai � @ U @ U � � J @ 0. m Cr PO to I� � (O N w N w CO m O Z U v N:t-- N Q p to �_ t 'O O (0 '--' •� — @ Q^ N O 'p 0 (n O o w rn w� N 2 41) — a_ o U @ nN cca s@> Ca a) oo � a X �o � N U c U O z U nO Q@ @ q7 (o U O C a- @ O N E- Ca M o o x as U ,� _@ N O U C o E o U R 7 a)_FL Q��lC ��UvNQ LL'ti-ORQ' Cry LO co rO h @ (Ta Q N d � 000� O O p�j O 00 Q d r r m 5 00 C'7 Q 00LO 0 O O 1,- �r O Kl Q �r to CD 00 Q 0 0 0 0 0 O to LA to Ca (li M o N O N •- [ri r CD o0 Ln CO aQO C m O 00 c0 CO CO 64 d3 lI} w (/} G�# uM'� 1on CDl} of} w W w EFl 64 jj r 6F3 6A 6f> 60- (Ai C O _ f (j C t}) cl ,z C {} d v aI Q c C rxx.1 C a0+ Y O L) U ttqq ma< w0� w a Lu —j US ul LnC) CA O. �LLiL C1J w muLu f fiNill MC Exhibit B-Property Legal Description BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 AREA Av BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1045, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 15611, PAGE 257, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.), AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS! LOTS 1-20, LOTS 27-36, BLOCK 20; LOTS 1---8, LOTS 17-24, BLOCK 232; LOTS 1 —10, LOTS 15-24, BLOCK 233; LOTS 1-10, BLOCK 234, NORTH FORT WORTH ADDITION, CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 204—A, PAGE 117, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. LOTS 1 —2, A PORTION OF LOTS 3-6, BLOCK C; LOTS 1 —4, AND A PORTION OF LOTS 5-6, BLOCK 8; AND LOTS 1 —2, LOT 4, AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK F; OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T.; A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 32, BLOCK 1; A PORTION OF LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 2; INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 204, PAGE 101, D.R.T.C.T.; TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO. 2336, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 112, D.R.T.C.T.; ORDINANCE NO. 2092, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 1447, PAGE 505, AND ORDINANCE NO. 3416 (UNRECORDED); BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH COMMERCE STREET, 100 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTH SIXTH STREET, BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20 IN BLOCK 20 OF NORTH FORT WORTH AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY TRACT; THENCE North 60'00'00" East, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 269.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 30'00'00" ast A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 520.13 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544" AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 IN BLOCK 234 OF SAID NORTH FORT WORTH ADDITION; THENCE South 29'59'34" East ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 234 A DISTANCE OF 700.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 147.35 FEET TO A POINT AT THE THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 550.00 FEET, WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS South 52'47'12" West, 395.76 FEET; THENCE WITH SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35'26'53", AN ARC LENGTH OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 608.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 436.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 30'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 1294.73 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 30'00'19" West A DISTANCE OF ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ® ® CIF geodes ! 11oS SOUTH "SN STRfu GURLESOH. Tx Mows 617--7-4122 499.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 20.73 EXHIBIT "B" SHT. NO. PLS JOB No. 20041 D6-10 1 OF 5 nc. F-3 N�T-T BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1045, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 1 561 1, PAGE 257, RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 5-6, BLOCK B; A PORTION OF LOTS 3-6, LOTS 7-8, BLOCK C; LOTS 1-2, A PORTION OF LOTS 3-4, BLOCK D, A PORTION OF LOTS 1 —5, BLOCK E; OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T.; TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO. 2336, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 112, D.R.T.C.T.; BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHICH A 1 /2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", BEARS North 60'00'00" East, 250.00 FEET AND North 32°40'00" East, 27.27 FEET; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 294.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 30'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 608.50 FEET TO A POINT AT THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 650.00 FEET, WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS North 52'47' 12" East, 395.76 FEET, THENCE WITH SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35°26'53", AN ARC LENGTH OF 402.14 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE South 21°29'25" East A DISTANCE OF 665.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 4.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ® k ®Fyy ®®GeTX odesy liOB 501100650N S1fiEE7 EUHLMON. Tx 75028 DATE: 03-211-07 I DRAWN: JWB I CHECKED: M.P. I PLS JOB No. 2004106-1D EXHIBIT "B" SHT• NO. 2 OF 5 AREA Co BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1045, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 15611, PAGE 257, RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; A PORTION OF LOTS 3-4 AND 7, AND LOTS 5-6, BLOCK C; AND A PORTION OF LOTS 5-8, BLOCK E OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T. TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO. 2336, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 112, D.R.T.C.T.; BEGINNING AT A 1 /2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544" FROM WHICH THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 15, BLOCK 234, NORTH FORT WORTH ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 204—A, PAGE 117, P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE South 37° 1 6'00" East A DISTANCE OF 49.55 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 30°38'00" East A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 00"36'00" East A DISTANCE OF 185.70 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 89°22'00" East A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 32'40'00" East A DISTANCE OF 27.27 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60°00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 21°29'25" West A DISTANCE OF 665.52 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60"00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 147.35 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30°00'58" East A DISTANCE OF 320.98 FEET TO A 1 /2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING OR 2.79 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Ai k DFW 14P"'Geodesy 11a8 swU DaesU STREET BURUSON, T 16625 817—u7-4122 DATE. 03-28-07 1 DRAWN: Me CHECKED: M.P. PLS J08 No. 2004106-10 Uopyright c 2001 by Geodesy, Inc. EXHIBIT "B" SHT. N0. 3 OF 5 AREA Do BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1045, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 15611, PAGE 257, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.), AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 1-8, LOTS 9-10, BLOCK E; A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK F; OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T.; A PORTION OF LOTS 1, 23-28, 31 AND 32, LOTS 2-10, LOTS 29-30, BLOCK 1; A PORTION OF LOTS 1 —4, BLOCK 2; INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 204, PAGE 101, D.R.T.C.T.; TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO. 2336, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 112, D.R.T.C.T.; BEGINNING AT A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", FOR THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; HENCE South 00°38'00" East A DISTANCE OF 232.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 89'44'00" East A DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 00' 1 6'00" East A DISTANCE OF 173.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60°00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 426.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 30'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 436.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60"00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 594.15 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 32°40'00" East A DISTANCE OF 67.03 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING OR 5.24 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. J.-Aomx x ®k DF i911< IN ®Geodesy 1188 SMM O SON STBEET BUMiEWN, M MON 817-447-4122 DATE: 03-28--07 , DRAWN: JWB CHECKEDs M.P. I PLS JOB No. 2004106-10 �_Opyrjgnt c y urvv Leocl"y, Inc. EXHIBIT "B" SHT. N0, 4 OF 5 1' -� a-t. .Z. Z _,� of at O er _ It • �. S ggy L£ 9C Sr n rt 4f CI tl N : K o Si K 9! y if or 91 el 00 .0trog or e$lVVI�S a rr a r, - •. cz aNf wan ZH *k! - ` ix _ S w`�b p(� IS aZ A11�s ei 0• o lLo @eYPI 7C fr W � tr 9 _� 13381S HL313 g i y, •� w jjjif - O •• ' w • - -' COW a r a'o {ttss s�aa ,t�l.a/1 N .Ci;OZC ' _ - - •� .00rO�Z b•" i� .•. ' pp ,4L- ....•-. ALM e ll 1Ya71NH533 - Wd 133WS ONIHI N ! z £ t 9 9 e P O Q O 9t Lt 9t SY t7 n at [ @ a o1 1L 9 ZL EL It ryl Ir m = 3 It OP dr 9f Lr 9f Sf f£ 91 L1 X n CV u t0- u = Ca Lf�Y tL � 133ULS KWf103 •N 9t 1 Lr z 47 C at t ri 5 EY 9 at L it @ cs at t1 9f CL SK 7C Yl 9i Q f£ 91 (y r£ 41 IE t£ of 91 dl 11z z eZ LC O Y Lr 9Z ar fC O C'4 sr tr 1332S1S N1dfd •N 9/f 4t Lt t Z 9r 9f C f ri S ft LY 9 L -�Vj LO MjQ AQ LOOK O IgBpAda-, m Exhibit C-Property Areas BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy a104.25.07Y2 AREA A. BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1045. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 15611, PAGE 257, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.), AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 1-20, LOTS 27-36, BLOCK 20; LOTS 1-8, LOTS 17-24, BLOCK 252; LOTS 1-10, LOTS 15-24, BLOCK 233; LOTS 1-10, BLOCK 234, NORTH FORT WORTH ADDITION, CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 204-A, PAGE 117, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. LOTS 1-2, A PORTION OF LOTS 3-6, BLOCK C; LOTS 1-4, AND A PORTION OF LOTS 5-6, BLOCK B; AND LOTS 1-2, LOT 4, AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK F; OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T.; A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 32, BLOCK 1; A PORTION OF LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 2; INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 204, PAGE 101, D.R.T.C.T.; TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO. 2336. A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 112, D.R.T.C.T.; ORDINANCE NO. 2092, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 1447, PAGE 505, AND ORDINANCE NO. 3416 (UNRECORDED); BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH COMMERCE STREET, 100 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF NORTH SIXTH STREET, BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20 IN BLOCK 20 OF NORTH FORT WORTH AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY TRACT; THENCE North 60'00'00" East, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 269.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 30'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 520.13 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544" AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 1N BLOCK 234 OF SAID NORTH FORT WORTH ADDITION; THENCE South 29'59'34" East ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 234 A DISTANCE OF 700.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 147.35 FEET TO A POINT AT THE THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 650.00 FEET, WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS South 52'47'12" West, 395.76 FEET; THENCE WITH SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35'26'53", AN ARC LENGTH OF 4D2.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 608.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 436.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 30'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 1294.73 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 30'OD'19" West A DISTANCE OF ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ® ® ®F ®®ce®elesy iiga Sm1 D005M STREET QU ESOW nt Men 817-H7-4123 499.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 20,73 II DATE: 03-28--07 I DRAWN: IWB i CHECKED: M.P.. I PLS JOB No. 2004106-10 y, Inc. EXHIBIT "'C" 00i��t�a 55T7 1rn ED AREA B: BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1045, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 15611, PAGE 257, RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D_R.T.C.T.) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 5--6, BLOCK 8; A PORTION OF LOTS 3-6, LOTS 7-8. BLOCK C; LOTS 1-2, A PORTION OF LOTS 3-4, BLOCK D, A PORTION OF LOTS 1 —5, BLOCK E; OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T.; TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO, 2336, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 112, D.R.T.C.T.; BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHICH A 1 /2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", BEARS North 60°00'00" East, 250.00 FEET AND North 32°40'00" East, 27,27 FEET; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 294.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 30"00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 608.50 FEET TO A POINT AT THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 650.00 FEET, WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS North 52°47'12" East, 395.76 FEET, THENCE WITH SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35'26'53", AN ARC LENGTH OF 402.14 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE South 21"29'25" East A DISTANCE OF 665.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 4.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. A k DFW M I Geodeq y ... oo9. s,RErr BURLESON. N 76040 91]- 7- 22 RATE: 03--28-07 DRAWN- JWB � CHECKED: M.P. I PLS JOB No. 2004106-10 opyrig c y UFW UcOde3y, InC. EXHIBIT fgC99 SHT. NO. 2 OF 5 AREA Co BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO, 1045, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 15611, PAGE 257, RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; A PORTION OF LOTS 3--4 AND 7, AND LOTS 5-6, BLOCK C; AND A PORTION OF LOTS 5-8, BLOCK E OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T. TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO. 2336, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 117, D.R.T.C.T.; BEGINNING AT A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544" FROM WHICH THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 15, BLOCK 234, NORTH FORT WORTH ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 204---A, PAGE 117, P.R.T.C.T.; THENCE South 37°16'00" East A DISTANCE OF 49.55 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 30"38'00" East A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 00°36'00" East A DISTANCE OF 185.70 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 89'22'00" East A DISTANCE OF 1 00..00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 32°40'00" East A DISTANCE OF 27.27 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 21'29'25" West A DISTANCE OF 665.52 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60'00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 147.35 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 30'00'58" East A DISTANCE OF 320.98 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING OR 2.79 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ® Iik DFW It ®Geodesy MB 9%TN 008UN MEET BUNLEnQ. TX 75020 MT-447-4M PATE: 03-28-07 L DRAWN: JWB I CHECKED: M.P. I PLS JOB No. 2004106-10 opyng c y UPT leolesy, Inc. ilk-Odi c03_16` 10 EXHIBIT "C" SHT. NO. 3 OF 5 AREA Do BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE F.G. MULLIKEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 1045, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AS RECORDED IN DEED VOLUME 15611, PAGE 257, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS (D.R.T.C.T.), AND BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOTS 1-8, LOTS 9---10, BLOCK E; A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK F; OF THE UNION LAND COMPANY'S INDUSTRIAL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 309, PAGE 75, D.R.T.C.T.; A PORTION OF LOTS 1, 23-28, 31 AND 32, LOTS 2-10, LOTS 29-30, BLOCK 1 ; A PORTION OF LOTS 1 —4, BLOCK 2; INDUSTRIAL ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 204, PAGE 101, D.R.T.C.T.; TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS CLOSED AND ABANDONED BY CITY OF FORT WORTH ORDINANCE NO. 2336, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS RECORDED IN VOLUME 2063, PAGE 112, D.R.T.C.T.; BEGINNING AT A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", FOR THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE South 00"38'00" East A DISTANCE OF 232.00 FEET TO A 1/2 ..OH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE North 89"44'00" East A DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544"; THENCE South 00"16'00" East A DISTANCE OF 173.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 60'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 426.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 30'00'00" West A DISTANCE OF 436.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE North 60"00'00" East A DISTANCE OF 594.15 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE South 32'40'00" East A DISTANCE OF 67.03 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED, "RPLS 5544", TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING OR 5.24 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ® ® DFW -MWGeodesy 11p8 SWTH DRBSM STREET 8URLE-WN. TX 760 8 817-447-4122 DATE: 03-28-07 I DRAWN: JWB CHECKED: M.P. I PL5 JOB No. 2004105-10 Copyright c YU01 Dy UFW GeO esy, nc. j--A-*fc(T a a EXHIBIT "C" SHT. NO. 4OF5 at ` r'ap � ' 'ear : � •'; � �� - u at a e 9 8 of CE l l LL ri ro 1Vf � 9L 4� zC LL • _ _,SLVOV 3.00,404ONZ of bt to ,ao'os •.,_ bz x SL S"lMo Bor. - �- am .o. oxen n 'Mrs N 1A.00,0049s® ez or 4 0,N fl ��• low i CL ►L y 1332115 H1J13 k-6(j�.Q�.�$ r V. ......., r" Yuj in :. > z ..i z rc .. - -t qSF t�l - �. •. Orcq yCal N, - J oo,00a 3.00.o_ a.alml �a , 99 99 ,' v V33V Cwss 5tda)!8;_L/; •iS�ZC ! .p00aZ i 00' [z lapN.{si _ TV099'.2 - 3,00,FXH -� •1 1Wa�NXa31 rLaA a •Lo 1 :. NOCINUMOM xIILarL , 60d a3a1s aaitu 14 L S 9 L P a OL 9 IL EL YL SL IIL IL st Q co p In „ 7 _ }� n � � � O 04 Pr Y► ri L` L} at BC Le 99 Sf Ys 6 Ls Lc La x U 133UIS H"nOA 'N L r s c P R., LL si rL O si 9L W 133HIS b/s H131d •N L S C r 5 b C P b a4 LL LI CL rl SI Pl Ct PL et bz /Z LL cc YL C �p yf�o 4q�� ® 0 � Y pp77 s � 8 ~ _ Pr 4r br 4f rY ri LY tY OY aC aC CC 9f Sf K fC LC Le tx bz 9Z [L 9z SL •�iul Wsapoa9 Mj�Z Q 446ikdo, w Exhibit D RAP BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy M04.25.07v2 SIOW'h'Shaw Environmental, Inc. 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 214-277-7800 FAX: 214-277-8600 on z ca) Qc�-o(o Penn VCP No. 11359 600 North Jones Street Fort Worth, Texas Shaw Project No. 124883 Prepared for: B- 1-G Norrthside Developmont, L.P. 16980 Dallas Parkway Dallas, Texas 75248 Allen Holub ri Project Scientist Tramm, PhQ, PG, CHMM Prog am Manager TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMOld AL QUAL I i Y Response Action Flan Cover Pago Regulatory 11) number (Solid waste registration number, VCP ID number, etc) VCP No. 1359 check one: _Initial submittal for this on -site property ? Subsequent submittal for this on -site property Report date: March 2007 TCEQ Region No.: 4 TCl Q Program (check one) Corrective Action (Mail Code 127) X Voluntary Cleanup Program (Mail Code 221) RPR Section (Mail Code 137) BSuperfund PRP Lead (Mail Coda 143) Municipal Solid Waste Permits (Mail Code 124) On -Site Property Information On -Site Property Name: Former American Cyanamid Street no. 600 Pre dir: N Street name Jones Street type: St Post dir: City: Fort Worth �.. County: Tarrant County Code: 220 Zip: 76234 Nearest street intersection or location description: South Church Street and East Main Street Latitude: Degrees_ Minutes, Seconds OR Decimal degrees (circle one) North Lat: 32.7664567` Longitude: Degrees, Minutes, Seconds OR Decimal tieprees (circle one) West Long: -97.336075{ "Source- North Central Council of Governments Off -Site Affected Property Information Affected Off -Site None Property Name: Physical Address: NA Street no. City: Street no. Street no. County: = Check if no off -site properties affected Street no. County Code: Street no. Zip: Contact Person Information and Acknowledgement Person (or company) Name: BLG Northside Development, LP Contact Person: Mr. Carl Dell+ Title: President Mailing Address, 16980 Dallas Parkway City: Dallas State: Texas Zip: 75248 G-mail address cbell@bellgroup. corn _ Phone:T (972)518-4801 Fax: (972)581-4802 By my signature below,. I acknowledge the requirement of §350.2(a) that no person shall submit information to the executive director or to parties who are required to be provided information under this chapter which they know or reasonably should have known to be false or intentionally misleading, or fail to submit available Information which is critical to the understanding of the matter at hand or to the basis of critical decisions which reasonably would have been influenced by that information. Violation of this rule may subject a p son to the imposition of civil, criminal, or administrative penalties. Signature of Pers n Name, print:, .Date: TCEO-1032&RAP Fsbruary 2Q05 14 RAP Executive Summary ID No.: 1359 Report Date: March 2007 Use this worksheet to summarize the report_ Be sure to complete and submit the Checklist for Report Completeness. Attach a chronology of activities associated with the affected property. Briefly describe the affected property and PCLE zones, the conclusions from the assessment activities, identify any affected or threatened receptors, and describe any other major considerations taken into account when developing this response action plan_ If any portion of the response action is necessitated due to an aesthetic or nuisance condition, identify the nature of that condition and identify that portion of the response action proposed to address it. If any media that contains a POLE zone is not addressed in [nis KAH, provide lustitication. To aid in the identification of the portions of the site that currently meet TRRP assessment requirements and those requiring further assessmentfremediation, the site is divided into four (4) Partial Response Action Areas (PRAAs). A figure (Figure 1A) depicting the four PRAAs and cumulative soil boring/surface sampling locations is attached to this letter. o PRAA A — Northern and Western Portions of the Site • PRAA B — Middle Portion of the Site (Shallow Fill Material) • PRAA C — Southeastern and Eastern Disposal Areas (Deep Fill Material) e PRAA D — South Disposal Area (Deep Fill Material) Shaw was able to demonstrate in the previous APAR Addendum that PRAA A did not require further assessment of investigation. The TCEQ Project Manager concurred with this conclusion and it is our understanding that a Certificate of Completion for PRAA A is forthcoming. Based on the data collected to date, there are three portions of the Site that exhibit COCs above the MSD-adjusted Residential PCLs. The COCs include Vanadium, Copper, Molybdenum, and Nickel within PRAAs B, C, and D. Additional investigation was conducted for this RAP within PRAA B to help define remedial objectives. This additional investigation included the advancement of eight soil borings with four of them twinning soil PCL exceedances observed in soil samples SS-1 8, SS-20, SS-4, and SS-15. Drilling and sampling procedures are consistent with those documented in the APAR and APAR Addendum. The PRAA A field work included the advancement of eight (8) soil borings using a drilling rig equipped with direct push equipment and acetate lined samplers to depths ranging from eight to twelve feet below ground surface (bgs). The soil boring logs are attached to this RAP (Appendix 2). The sample analysis included analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method SW-846 #8260, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by TCEQ Method TX1005, and RCRA 8 metals, vanadium, molybdenum, nickel, and copper. The tabulated analytical results and applicable regulatory thresholds are presented in Tables 1 and 2 (Appendix 2). The laboratory data sheets are included with this RAP (Appendix 2). This objective of this RAP is to address the POLE Zones remaining within PRAAs B, C, and D. As demonstrated in the APAR, the POLE Zones are within soil only and remedial responses to groundwater are not required. What is the selected remedy standard for this affected property? X A B TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 15 RAP Fy, 4itive Summary IL j., 1359 Report Date. March 2007 List all media that contains a PCLE zone and specify the proposed response action for each media. Indicate the type of removal, decontamination, physical control and/or institutional control action that is proposed. Media COCs, Removal Decontamination Control Physical Modified Groundwater Response Control ON tive2 PMZ WCU TI Soil vanadium x _ Soil copper x _ Soil molybdenum Soil Inickel x Is there a media that contains a PCLE zone that is not addressed in this RAP? yes X no If yes, provide justification for not addressing the PCLE zone in this RAP. On -site land use: Residential IX f Commercial/Industrial Off -site land use: Residential FX_J Commercial/Industrial (check all that apply) Is this a re -submittal or revision of a previous RAP? Yes X No If yes, explain why the RAP is being revised or resubmitted. T Were all the appropriate notifications made in accordance with §350.55? X Yes _ No If no, explain why notifications were not made: Specify either a specific COC or, if the response action is the same for all COCs in one type, specify the type of COC (for example, VOCs, SVOCs, metals). 2 If a modified groundwater response objective is proposed, check the type(s) of proposed modifications. TCEQ-10326/RAP February2005 1.6 Checklist for, port Completeness ID k _ . 1359 Report Date: March 2007 Use this checklist to determine the portions of the form that must be submitted for this report. Answer all questions by checking Yes or No. If the answer is Yes include that portion of the report. If the answer is No, do not complete or submit that portion of the report. All form contents that are marked 'Required" must be submitted. Form contents marked with an asterisk (*) are not included in the blank form and are to be provided by the person. Report Contents Required Cover Page Required Executive Summary Required Checklist for Report Completeness Required Worksheet 1.0 I—Res2onse Action Objectives No ® Have new data been collected that was not previously ❑ Yes Attachment 1A* submitted? Maps and Cross Sections �Allachmenl IEl' ❑ r; aP115 of CoMA1410110rl v4�S11S Tlnlcl — Required Worksheet 2.0 Response Action Design Required Attachment 2A* E9 Response Action Diagrams and Component/Equipment Descri tions Required Allnchrit6nl201 ❑ lPropf)=d VVerl Design 1 No ® Is an ecological services analysis or compensatory ❑ Yes Atlaclime nt 2r;' ❑ restoration plan part of the proposed response action? FSA and OuInpEinsalory ReMotalion Ptgn No ® Is a plume management zone proposed as part of the ❑ Yes Worksheet 2_1 ❑ response action? M►Q1 Is a waste control unit proposed as part of the response action? --..� Plurna hdana�omoni 2nne I Atlauhinonl210' ❑ f ILlma Mars ementZDne NJa Attaclurient a' ❑ —�� AltenuiUUurl AcMri Levels Dalerminaliun ❑ Yes Warkahaet ,?,T. — ❑ Ste C0+001 111'iIl Allar1ionow IF* ❑ 01 p ul Wasie Ounllol LIP Is a technical impracticability area proposed as part of the ❑ Yes response action? Wir rkNheet 2.3 'l�eohrliral impr�taloairlNly — Attachment 2G' M. sp of Technical TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 17 Checklist foli port Completeness ID, 1359 Report Date: March 2007 Report Contents No Is the response action a remedy standard B? n Yes _ VV.prsrl,;: 1 1 ❑ II;tiISF.Ii��]nal Required Worksheet 3.0 Performance Measures and Potential Problems Required Worksheet 3.1 EMonitoringand Sam tin Required Attachment 3A* Map of Monitoring and Sampling Points Required Worksheet 3.2 Operation and Maintenance Required Worksheet 4.0 Confirmation Sampling Plan Required Attachment 4A* Map of Confirmation Sampling Points No Is the response action a Remedy Standard B? WnrksYloet 6.0 ❑ Pusl PespQnpaAcIlonCate Attaahineol SA` ❑ Map ui PRAC Iy1tr1111oriny awl samo1 ng_Poinls — _ AilaahmEml50'— ❑ PRAC: Cosln No ® Does the person, who is a small business, desire to El Yes Jlttachrneat 5C' ❑ modify the financial assurance re uirement? SnI41I1 Buriness'AtOAeVlI Required Worksheet 6.0 ❑ Implementation Schedule Required Appendix V References No ❑ Was any data collected that was not previously ® Yes Appendix 2* reported? Data Tables and Boring Logs No ® Were any studies or tests conducted? ❑ Yes Appendix V ❑ Studies and -Teats I�ari,nlerlialir�n No ® Is the response action a Remedy Standard B?0 Yes I Apiaendlx 4` I ❑ L PlapoSod 1118kNulional cortrols J No ® Are any institutional controls proposed/required on ❑Yes A PPtiidix 5' ❑ property not owned by the person e I ki-minr �'Oncurrence —� No ® Are any of the sample collection or handling ❑ Yes Appendix (P ❑ procedures different from those reporting in the APAR Sampling Procedures or other r)reviousiv submitted reoort? No 0 1 Are statistics or geostatistics proposed to be used as 1 ❑ Yes No ® Was approval received from the TCEQ regarding the use of different rules to address a media? ❑ Yes Appendix i' I ❑ >I@PsllcaJ mothods?1rayy l Appendix 3` ❑ SPt11 MMI.R Apnrnval _ Form contents marred with an asterisk (*) are not included in the blank form. TCEQ-10326/RAP February 2005 18 Project Chronology Site: VCP Site No. 1359 600 North Jones Street Fort Worth, Texas LIN, haW" Shaw Environmental, Inc. 1940s to 1983 The Site operated as a petroleum catalyst manufacturing facility by American Cyanamid. The facility stopped operation in 1983 due to the waning oil industry. 1968 to 1983 Technicoat, Inc. operated a coatings facility adjacent to the north of the American Cyanamid operations. 1990 American Cyanamid dismantled the equipment and demolished the facility. In March 1990 Roy F. Weston, Inc. (Weston) conducted a Site Investigation and Risk Assessment. The results indicated that "the metals from the material remaining at the plant site do not represent a significant threat to public health or the environment." The non -hazardous materials remaining buried in well-defined areas can remain in place in accordance with Texas environmental regulations. The metals contained in these areas are typically bound to the aluminum substrate which was used in catalyst production at the site. Nearby off -Site sediment and remote down -gradient groundwater samples confirm that these metals are basically immobile in the environment. June 1997 Weston conducted a Site Inspection of the Site to meet the requirements of the TNRCC Corrective Action Directive (CAD) dated march 31, 1995. Weston advanced 21 groundwater monitoring wells and15 shallow soil borings, conducted sediment and surface water testing, and completed a sensitive receptor survey. Based on analytical results, concentrations of metals above background levels exist over most of the surface soil at the Site. Groundwater analytical results indicate two separate areas of sulfate concentrations above background levels and concentrations of molybdenum, magnesium, and vanadium above background levels in one monitoring well. Results of the river sediment and water sampling indicate the West Fork Trinity River has not been adversely impacted by historical operations at the Site. March 2001 Brown & Caldwell Engineering conducted a groundwater sampling report at the former Cytec and Technicoat properties. Brown & Caldwell sampled all 16 wells on Cytec's property and four wells on Technicoat's property to determine if VOCs identified in groundwater at Technicoat were sourced at Cytec. TCE and cis-1,2- DCE were detected in most monitor wells sampled with the exception of four. Other chlorinated solvents, including PCE , trans-1,2-DCE, and vinyl chloride were also identified. The report indicated that concentrations of VOCs identified on the Technicoat property were well above concentrations found in Cytee wells and may be indicative of a source area in vicinity of Technicoat. However, chlorinated VOCs were also detected in upgradient wells indicating an off -Site source may be contributing to the impact. May 2001 The Site entered the TCEQ Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP ID #1359) by the City of Fort Worth. August 2001 The IT Corporation (IT) developed a summary letter of soil assessment data for the Site. IT summarized all of the soil sampling conducted at the Site and collected additional surface soil samples in vicinity of the wastewater retention ponds. The sampling identified aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, and molybdenum above applicable Industrial MSCs in vicinity of the wastewater retention ponds. October 2001 IT developed a summary letter of groundwater assessment data for the Site. COCs identified in the groundwater were limited primarily to chlorinated solvents and a few metals. IT identified potential source areas for the groundwater contamination may be near the southeast disposal area and the Technicoat property based on concentrations in groundwater and EMFLUX data. IT recommended implementing a quarterly groundwater sampling program. June 2002 to 2005 Enercon Services, Inc. (Enercon) conducted groundwater monitoring at the Site for the City of Foil Worth. Contaminant concentrations detected in wells generally appear to decrease over time. Based on the trends in the analytical data, natural attenuation appears to be occurring at the Site. September 2006 W&M Environmental Group, Inc. (W&M) conducted a soil investigation in the wooded area within Area D, formerly the Southern Disposal Area. Lead and selenium were identified at concentrations exceeding background levels; however, no COCs were identified above applicable TRRP Tier l PCLs for residential land use. The LaGrave Area Municipal Setting Designation was submitted to the City of Fort Worth February 2007 Shaw Environmental, Inc. (Shaw) completed an APAR Addendum which demonstrated that soil within PRAA A met MSD-adjusted Residential Tier 1 PCLs. March 2007 The LaGrave Are MSD was certified by the TCEQ. The APAR was approved by the TCEQ Response Action Objectives Associated Information: Attachment 1A, 1B RAP Worksheet 1.0 ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Use this worksheet to describe the objectives for the response action in each media. Response Action Objectives List the environmental media to which this applies Soil impacted by vanadium, molybdenum, copper, and nickel above Critical PCLs (CPCLs). Repeat this section for each medium that has a different response action objective. State the property -specific response objectives for the PCLE zone in each media in the context of the response objectives set forth in §350.32 or §350.33 as applicable. Explain how the response action is appropriate based on the hydrogeologic characteristics, COC characteristics, and potential unprotective conations inai couio corrunue or resua auring ine rememai penoo. Based on the data collected to date, three PRAAs contain soil POLE Zones requiring a response action. A depiction of the PCLE Zones has been provided on Attachment 2A-1 through Attachment 2A-3. The response action selected for the PCLE Zones is excavation of soil exhibiting COCs above CPCLs and off - site disposal. The CPCLs for copper, molybdenum, nickel, and vanadium are 550 mg/Kg, 160mg/Kg, 830 mg/Kg, and 290 mg/Kg, respectively. Based on the significant quantities of soil involved and consultation with the TCEQ vCP project Manager, the excavation methodology will include exploratory trenching for PRAAs C and D and use of X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) with additional laboratory confirmation to allow real-time field evaluation of impacted media. PRAA B: The affected areas include four areas which are anticipated to be roughly 40 feet by 40 feet to an average depth of three feet below grade_ It should be noted that the additional assessment used to help delineate the PCLE Zones within PRAA A included duplicate samples. Of the duplicate or "twinned" sample points, only GP-B16 identified soil concentrations above the CPCLs. Based on the past exceedances within these areas, it has been decided that excavation with both field verification and laboratory confirmation is needed to determine that no PCLE Zones remain in PRAA B. PRAA C: The affected area is within an irregular shaped area extending to approximately 500 feet in length, 100 feet in width with portions anticipated to reach up to twelve feet below grade. The extent of the impacted soil will be first evaluated through a series of test pits to determine fill boundaries from past disposal of metal -impregnated alumina and related plant waste material using visual, olfactory, PID and XRF evaluation of the soil in these areas. Confirmation of the excavation walls and floors will be performed on an approximate 10' by 10' grid through calibrated XRF testing in the field. The confirmation sampling (XRF) will be confirmed through laboratory confirmation of at a frequency of 1/20 to provide additional confirmation of site remedial activities. PRAA D: The affected area is within an irregular shaped area extending to approximately 340 feet in length, 200 feet in width with portions anticipated to reach up to eight feet below grade. The extent of the impacted soil will be first evaluated through a series of test pits to determine fill boundaries from past disposal of metal -impregnated alumina and related plant waste material using visual, olfactory, PID and XRF evaluation of the soil in these areas. Confirmation of the excavation walls and floors will be performed on an approximate 10' by 10' grid through calibrated XRF testing in the field. The confirmation sampling (XRF) will be confirmed through laboratory confirmation of at a frequency of 1/20 to provide additional confirmation of site remedial activities. The response action selected for the above PRAAs is based on the physical characteristics of the COCs (highly immobile), selected surficial disposal within portions of PRAA B and isolated disposal areas in PRAAs C and D and the MSD for the site. Excavation activities will be conducted by HAZWOPER trained professionals working under a site -specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP). To minimize soil migration -during the proposed remedial event, the response action will have a site -specific SWPPP and TCEQ-10326/RAP February 2005 19 Response Action Objectives Associated Information. Attachment 1A, I RAP Worksheet 1.0 ID No.: 1359 1. March 2007 dust control plan for all site activities_ Explain how the COCs will be handled, treated, disposed, or transferred to another media and document that the response action will not result in any additional potential exposure conditions due to response action activities. The areas depicted on Attachment 2A-1 through Attachment 2A-3 will be excavated, field evaluated using XRF and PID equipment to determine if impacted soil above CPCLs is identified. Soil with COCs above CPCLs will be overexcavated, stockpiled and disposed off site following waste characterization. State the proposed "reasonable time frame" and provide the justification for that time frame in the context of any potential for unprotective exposures to exist or develop, COC characteristics, hydrogeologic and affected property characteristics. If the reasonable time frame is different for the different affected media or for particular tracts of land, be sure to discuss that. Provide how the proposed response action will meet the objectives in a reasonable timeframe. _ The proposed remedial actions will be completed within three months of project initiation. Measures will be taken throughout the remedial event to minimize exposure to both the remedial staff and surrounding properties. Soil Response Action Objectives When using removal and/or decontamination with controls or controls only, demonstrate how that physical control or combination of measures will reliably contain COCs within and/or derived from the surface soil and subsurface soil PCLE zone materials over time. No controls are proposed for this remedial event. The soil excavation activities will extend beyond the proposed excavation boundaries if soil PCLE Zones are identified. Through the use of real-time field data for investigative and confirmatory data, the excavation areas can be effectively evaluated. Additional laboratory confirmation of the XRF confirmation data will ensure that the remaining soil at the site is below the CPCLs. Confirmation of the excavation walls and floors will be performed on an approximate 10' by 10' grid through calibrated XRF testing in the field with laboratory verification on a 1/20 ratio. Attachments 3A (1- 3) and 4A(1-3) provide the genera! confirmation points proposed for this excavation. Explain how the removal or decontamination action will reduce the concentration of COCs to the critical surface soil and subsurface soil PCL throughout the soil POLE zone and prevent COC concentrations above the critical soil PCLs from migrating beyond the existing boundary of the soil POLE zone_ Based on the assessment data to date, the impacted soil is anticipated to be within the depicted excavation areas. These areas will be evaluated by exploratory test pits and real-time data acquisition to confirm the removal of soil above the CPC Ls. TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 20 Response Action Objectives RAP Worksheet 1.0 Associated Information: Attachment 1A, I ID No.: 1359 1 March 2007 Groundwater Response Action Objectives Name of groundwater -bearing unit to which this information Not Applicable applies Repeat this section for each groundwater -bearing unit for which a different response action is proposed. Groundwater classification 1 2 3 Is a modified groundwater response action being proposed for any part of the groundwater PCLE zone (§350.33(f)(2), (3), or (4))? Yes No If yes, does the affected property meet the qualifying criteria for a modified groundwater response action using a waste control unit, plume management zone, or technical impracticability? Yes No If yes, complete the appropriate portions of this report. If no to either question, complete the following: Explain how the removal or decontamination action will reduce the concentration of COCs to the critical groundwater PCL throughout the groundwater PCLE zone and prevent COG concentrations above the critical rcrooundwater PCL from migrating beyond the existing boundary of the groundwater PCLE zone. Explain how the response action will prevent COCs from migrating to air at concentrations above the PCLs for air if the groundwater -to -air PCLs (A'rGWw,_u) is exceeded. Explain how the response action will prevent COCs from migrating to surface water at concentrations above the PCLs for groundwater discharges to surface water if surface water is a factor. Explain how the response action will prevent human and ecological receptor exposure to the groundwater PCLE zone. TCEQ-10326/RAP FebruM 2005 21 cv m 00 00 CV z uj m O z T r m n Q E* 1` Li z NORTH CALHOUN ST. O W F� z (� Lr C-END. MW-5 K40NIIOR WELL e SAMPLE UORfNC, LOCATIONS (1989-2001) 0 RECEN? SOIL. BORINGS (2006-2007) OH- SAMPLES EXCFFOING MSD--ADJIJSTED PCLS (V, Cu, Mo, Ni) —�—�� FENCE PRAA A PRAA S P RAP. C PRAA D L L___J PROPOSED EXCAVATfON AREAS 2RPW2s SS-32 2RPW28 i�,�„ 2RPW25 2RPW26 {I 1.1 •' - 4 .4' v 1�11 .ice �R1"• 1 2RPW23 Scor 2RPW242PPS21 SCF r • 2RPS22 - - 2RPN2 2RRRPppN28 .r _ i" ^%`3 RPM f i 02 FORMER TECHNICOAT Ld CARRUTHER'S 5 MADE -WELL GRANITE ./ MONUMENT " AND MARKERS NORTH COMMERCE STREET STORMWATER DISCHARGE PIPE Jf i TOA 8,04K rRr�1TY RlY�R PROPERTY BOUNDARY SUA S8-07 7_mlos BURIED DRUMS ti 3 �' 4 S0A SO-05 .7r_ w r {,f• SDA SB-004 -• _ C .,rr 1, R t� �{' • iiy'/�X.�iv s;l�It T Ik yr'�_f —CALHOUN SO-4 �sl ti L--STORMDRAIN CLOSED s5-24 4 '%A 58-003a SEEP CALHOUN So-3 u-€ - TRAILER AREA PROPERTY BOUNDARY vl F- E � Z SUITCOMMERCE DRIVE 5iil?E }90 IRVING, TEXAS 75063 (214) 277-7800 (TEL) NEW- (214) 277-8600 (FAX) 0 200 400 ATTACHMENT 1 A SITE MAP APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET FORMER AMERICAN CYANAMID VCP - 600 N. JONES STREET y I FORT WORTH, TEXAS ,�.��� k6l��k V4V Response action Design RAP Worksheet 2.0 Associated Information: Attachment 2A, 2B, 2C ID No.: 1359 Ntarch 2007 Response Action Design Use this worksheet to provide detailed descriptions of the response action. Attach design and layout drawings and equipment specifications in Attachment 2A. Media: Soil List all media to which this information applies. If the response action is different for another media, complete a separate worksheet. Provide a detailed description of the response action. Describe the removal action, decontamination, treatment system(s), andlor physical or institutional control actions that are proposed for each media and discuss the reasons for choosing the response action(s). Identify and describe any ecological services analysis and compensatory restoration plan that will be utilized (if so, include the complete ESA and compensatorycompensaiory restoration plan in Attachment 2C). The soil containing COG concentrations in excess of TRRP Critical PCLs will be excavated from the proposed excavation areas. The excavation activities will utilize a trackhoe to excavate within past disposal areas to allow field evaluation of excavated soil. The depths and lateral extent of the proposed excavations are discussed in Worksheet 1.0. The removal approach was selected based on the preferential disposal of material in specific portions of PRAA B, C, and D and the types of COCs present at the site. XRF was selected for this site based on the elevated CPCLs. and reliable field screening detection limits for the COGS. The detection limits for the COCs. at this site are Vanadium (10 mg/Kg), Copper (40 to 50 mg/Kg), Nickel (50 to 65 mg/Kg), and Molybdenum (4 to 50 mg/Kg). Selected radioactive sources will not be able to evaluate for Vanadium, however; Vanadium has typically been identified with related COCs within the PCLE areas. It is believed that the other COCs and laboratory confirmation sampling will be adequate to demonstrate attainment of CPCLs. Confirmation of the excavation walls and floors will be performed on an approximate 10' by 10' grid through calibrated XRF testing in the field with laboratory verification on a 1120 ratio. Attachments 3A (1- 3) and 4A (1-3) provide the general confirmation points proposed for this excavation. While TPH and VOCs are not considered COCs for this site, this RAP contemplates the periodic -sampling 1140 in areas where field evidence of volatile organic compounds are identified. Describe all major treatment system components and equipment of the response action. Illustrate the response action design and provide equipment specifications in Attachment 2A. List permits or registrations needed to construct or implement the response action, including permits or registrations needed to conduct studies or tests_ For VCP sites, list the permits that would be required if the site was not in the VCP (reauired by the VCP)_ Permitting/Registration Authority Type of permit/registration Permit or registration number if already issued Anticipated application date NIA Identify and discuss the results of any studies or tests, such as pilot studies, feasibility studies, technical impracticability studies, treatability studies, and/or toxicity studies conducted or proposed to be conducted at the affected property. Discuss the reason for the study or test and how it verifies the effectiveness and appropriateness of the chosen response action or documents that a particular response action is not TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 22 Response Action Design RAP Worksheet 2.0 Associated Information: Attachment 2A, 2B, 2C ID No.: 1359 March 2007 appropriate for the affected property. Describe how the results of completed studies or tests determined the design or choice of response action. Attach any separate reports and sur)oortina doc«mentatinn in .Appendix 3_ N/A TCEQ-10326IRAP February 2005 23 Plume Management Zone RAP Worksheet 2.1 Associated Information: Attachments 2D, 2E ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Complete this worksheet when a PMZ is proposed as part of the response action. Include in Attachment 2D a map of the proposed PMZ with alternate POE(s) and attenuation monitoring points identified and the current groundwater PCLE zone. If a PMZ is not proposed, do not submit this worksheet. Groundwater -bearing unit NA Repeat this worksheet for each groundwater -bearing unit for which a PMZ is proposed. Groundwater classification 2 3 Provide justification as to why the PMZ is appropriate in accordance with §350.33(f)(4)(A). Include supporting documentation in Attachment 2E. Is the alternate POE proposed to be beyond the current limits of the PCLE zone? Yes _ No If yes, how far? (§350.37(1) or (m) as applicable) Is it to be off -site? Yes No On an off -site property that currently does not contain a residential -based groundwater PCLE zone? Yes No If yes and this is a Class 2 groundwater, provide the basis for concluding that this groundwater does not have a reasonably anticipated future beneficial use (U50.37fI)(3)). Is NAPL present? Yes No If so, describe how the response action will achieve the performance criteria in If this is a Class 2 groundwater, explain how the response action will ensure that leachate from the surface soil and subsurface soil PCLE zones will not increase concentration of COCs greater than the current measured concentrations (at time of RAP submittal). (050.33(a)(2)) Provide the basis that the COCs will not migrate beyond the downgradient boundary of the PMZ at concentrations above the critical PCL. Include supporting documentation in Attachment 2E. Describe the methods used to determine that there are no artificial penetrations which can allow COCs to migrate from the groundwater PCLE zone to currently unaffected groundwater -bearing units. Include supporting documentation in Attachment 2E. TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 24 Plume Mianag jent Zone RAP Workshi 2.1 Associated Information: Attachments 2D, 2E ID No.: 1359 March 2001 List the attenuation action Level determined for each attenuation monitoring point. Illustrate the proposed attenuation monitoring points and the groundwater PCLE zone on the map in Attachment 2D. Include all calculations and other methods of determinina the attenuation action levels in Attachment 2F_ COC Attenuation Monitoring Point (well number) Attenuation Action Level (mg/L) Attenuation Action Air Level limited by GWInh-V or existing COC concentration? YIN TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 25 Waste Control Unit Associated Information: Attachment 2F RAP Worksheet 2.2 ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Use this worksheet to document the use of a waste control unit to modify the groundwater response actions (§350.33(f)(2)). Provide a map in Attachment 2F of the waste control unit overlying the PCLE zone. include proposed institutional controls in Appendix 4. If this modification does not apply, do not submit this worksheet. Is the waste control unit an existing unit? If yes, provide: the permit number _ description status active Yes No closed Describe how the existing or proposed WCU meets the definition set forth in If the WCU is proposed, identify any applicable permitting process that must be completed prior to operation of the WCU_ Has the applicable permit been pursued yet? Yes No if not, when will this be initiated? TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 26 Technical Impracticability RAP Worksheet 2.3 Associated Information. Attachment 2G ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Use this worksheet to justify the use of technical impracticability (TI) to modify the groundwater response objectives. Also complete Worksheet 2.2 to propose a plume management zone for the TI area. Include a map of the groundwater PCLE zone and area of technical impracticability in Attachment 2G. Include in the attachment any other documentation needed to make the justification. If technical impracticability is not proposed as part of the response action, do not submit this worksheet. Describe the groundwater PCLE zone and demonstrate in accordance with Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Impracticability of Ground -Water Restoration (EPA OSWER Directive 9234.2-25), unless otherwise approved by TCEQ, why it is technically impractical to reduce the COG concentrations to the critical PCLs, taking into account all currently available remediation technologies, and hydrogeologic and chemical -specific factors. Identify the specific COCs and list the PCLs that cannot be achieved. Are there groundwater COCs in excess of the critical PCLs beyond the TI area? _ Yes —No If yes, make sure removalldecontamination actions are documented in Worksheet 1.0. Will actions be required or already completed to prevent COG migration outside the area of technical impracticability and/or outside the existing boundary of the groundwater PCLE zone? Yes No If yes, make sure removal/decontamination actions are documented in Worksheet 1.0. TCEQ-10326/RAP February 2005 27 U) 0 h; C O U C O .j N C L6 o x O� �C: CL O Q Q Q O O G N y •- V H- i L (4 c u) a) L) N 0 73 � CT :3 U � � Q � O 0 Lo U) L Z O c o � L 0 0 � U N 7 C M U_ E O }' LO O _ E > ® G O u C � Q r 47 O C C .43 .� o �C7 CL _ u [B O UI (» U Ln U (0 C o � _ a C� V] U Y O i L O - L N < O O Q1 : L a a . c� 0 a�i O Q 0.4) U.Cu3af m� �n a U ih C Q I.L O � (0 41 O O N cu) C 0 0 ¢s 'C cyi a7 O Y y C [] a) O U a 0 a 3 cl. E c� � •C C G •7 C L ._ Cr 0 O 70 c0 LU O O) C 4 O C m U "� a m m c .o U sa SCE j y O O U U G py > c w O U c U m � 0 o a cn (6 M N @ O c6 U to o m U 0 = t U m Cl) O zi U) N a N U N O CL X G lif l� C O f6 CL x -Q O (M "C O O U N ('') to U 0 7�5 C o C 0 0 U O O � � 61 (SS G O (ti � •(6 E .Fn a v C 0 O U O v [tl O 0) C N C O 0 U L r CL .� O U O O U Q) !EU 0 E W 0 0� U 0— N �fzU 5 -0 !1 V 0 0 5-- (pi 5 C� 5` >N�m 0 �L N O Ol - ca y -c- +� a .-- .-+� C r. C_ C-2 C'-' C,a, Cam• C,�, C C C� per. E cc E fi r` fit` E CD LO ac O a� 0� �� 0� 0 0 O min O M o O (� ❑(O'nv, n�'n�'nfO'oGO7n O n ❑(ova. N m U M N C CL m 0 CL 0 n Q7 m 0 c 0 U [U C O N N G m N N co Go N z� �m A © z m DEPTH PCLE 0-1 r cu. 1,8701 F a LEGEND: C MW--5 r d} MONITOR WELL Q. e SAMPLE BORING LOCATIONS (1989-2001) RECENT SOIL BORINGS (2006--2007) SOIL SAMPLES EXCEEDING MSD-ADJUSTED PCLS (V, Cu, Mo, Ni) a FENCE PRAA C PROPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS Cu: COPPER (PCL=550 mg/Kg) MO. MOLYBDENUM (PCL=160 mg/Kg) V. VANADIUM (PCL=290 mg/Kg) Ni. NICKEL (PCL=830 mg/Kg) ALL CONCENTRATIONS PRESENTED IN mg/Kg DEPTH PCLE 1-3' Cu-, 26,900 Mo: 218 V• 352 0 40 80 - APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET DEPTH I PCLE 1-3' 1 Cu. 4,360 DEPTH PCLE - - �Cu: 1,950 - — - 0.5-5, Mo: 334 f V. 1,380 Cu. 12, 200 / 5-s Mo: 575 6,290 /1A,/ •=� SS-35 DEPTH PCLE 0-tr MO: 234 DEPTH PCLE DEPTH PCLE 0 2' M©: 259 0.5-3' Cu: 796 Cu. 10,460 5-10r Cu: 37.2 510, Mo. 309 V. 1,960 SS-14 e GP--B21 � I DEPTH PCLE 0-1' Ma: Z 800 A{rr; 1,150 GP—Bl8,7 6330 COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 190 IRVING, TEXAS 75063 (214) 277--7800 (TEL) (214) 277-8600 (FAX) ATTACHMENT 2A-2 PRAA C PROPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS FORMER AMERICAN CYANAMID VCP #1359 600 N. JONES STREET FORT WORTH, TEXAS BOUNDARY 6 S13934 CN cc co B-5 cv I3-9 B-22 O CK B-6® L B-7 l3 4• < SS-11 G GP--B2, m o @ fy- GIP-0 8 MW-1 IB *MW— 1 1 A SB-14 Q SS--12 ®SB-19 SB-18 dGP-B22 SS-15 0 GP-820 ? '-GP $19 SS-16 e LEGEND: MW-5 .�. MONITOR WELL ® SAMPLE BORING LOCATIONS (1989-2001) RECENT SOIL BORINGS (2006-2007) SOIL SAMPLES FXCEEDING 0 MSD-ADJUSTED PCLS (V, Cu, Mo, Ni) —�—a—�- FENCE PRAA 0 �.n...o�� PROPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS CU.' COPPER (PCL=550 mg/Kg) MO. MOLYBDENUM (PCL=160 mg/Kg) U' VANADIUM (PCL=290 mg/Kg) Ni NICKEL (PCL=830 mg/Kg) ALL CONCENTRATIONS PRESENTED IN mg/Kg !`S_35 TREES m --- I *VW- I '2 5DA SD--.9 r -� t BUR[ D D R U �"• - J 1 = � r S113-6/35-27 r I � # BURIED i DR r � SB-22 1> rl � O�TH + Dl S F-1108AL AgEA i S - a-- r t 0 50 100 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET DEPTH PCLE 0.5-6' V 6,230 DEPTH I PCLE 0-0.5' 1 Mo, 911 DEPTH PCLE cu. 748 0.5-6' Mo: 379 . V., 902 DEPTH PCLE 0-1' Mo, 1,060 -- V. 6141 DEPTH PCLE 0-0.5' Mc3. 480 V. 3,690 6330 COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 190 IRVING, TEXAS 75063 � (214) 277-7800 (TEL) (214) 277--8600 (FAX) ATTACHMENT 2A-3 PRAA D PROPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS FORMER AMERICAN CYANAMID VCP #1359 600 N, JONES STREET FORT WORTH, TEXAS Performance Measures and RAP Worksheet 3.0 ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Potential Problems Performance Measures List and describe the performance measures for each environmental medium containing a PCLE zone that will be used to determine if reasonable progress is being made by the response action in a timely manner. Use these measures to document eftecliveness of the response action in the RAER. Confirmation soil sampling will include the evaluation of TPH, VOCs in selected areas where field evidence of VOCs are identified with an emphasis on the evaluation of Vanadium, Copper, Nickel, and Molybdenum. Potential Problems Complete the table for the response action. When the response action consists of several components or multiple actions, complete one table for each major component or action. Response Action Name/Designation: Removal Action Event List the potential problems that might be reasonably anticipated for the response action, describe the impact of each problem, and the response to the problem. Description of the Potential Impact Will this Corrective Response Problem cause a response action failure? Yes No XRF Confirmation sampling Additional soil removal X Conduct additional excavation of soil identifies COCs in will be required activities. excess of the CPCLs Laboratory Confirmation Additional soil removal X Conduct additional excavation sampling of soil identifies will be required activities_ GOCs in excess of the CPCLs XRF and Laboratory Additional field X Increase in both field calibration efforts Confirmation samples show a calibration to know and laboratory confirmation frequency. discre2ancy in excess of 25% values will be required TCEQ-103261RAP February2005 29 e D tl? U) © O)"? G Ol Q U U U O o-:3 �3 [� G O QD U- oo co cu O N 03 O O (1) U) C O c E p O N U 12 '7 L C O a) G O {II a tO CD [0 CCD C OC] � N dy 3 L= L- C= Q) � C O — C W — , C L _ X O — 0 kl U) N Q iu Q � Li i 6 Q] T3 � •� � fB � t13 Uhl � i8 � G � N a(Dj C3 CL1 G ` 7 U) C > N O O O C E -0 O L U70 C m L (n o 43 O a) G O ca lL ca +- C6 O U f6 l6 w Ri U) Q O GOl N �cn •� � fn Cf) V l N (6 O In co � C p C7 cD co rN CL C 0 �_UD Q) U — o —a) U) co o n X `U : I— U3 O +— j O _ T L V C m [ O Y E O Q Q C o O Q C m Uc�iN _0 L O C Ud o U � cc cu0 U Lq o �o�U a �, i E o` U o > z I— O c O] O •F.- C C V 'D co o cEur •® cn O O O U Q 0 a a� = O W io(D E 3 w 0) C Q fo j, N M ?i .G (D E N N m m is a) C O E m U a7 � � C .w O � C E o NO CO U o O U Q G t O C a) O N E w Q O O CD E(D Q E U 02 c m �p c � x a)i � L v � p U n 0 o p {q C U Eu;0 •�•' a�1 4U-- C '� Q) U U O. L OL m C a) N « a m C N co 0 N L6 E O v D CO Q O •� E Lp_, N �o c Er nE CNN p U G p - O E N O {-' L a? O 'o � m O O G L T O _ 7 0)L U N fl N O N Q L O(Da-(n' ID c)W N W p'CYaL.+ U U C •U •U U N p � a �, 0 CQ 47 0 0 co c 3 N LL a Co �Q- 6 w v % d � � � ® k � 2 @ £ » k : \ E cjf §|k Operation and Maintenance RAP Worksheet 3.2 ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Use this worksheet to describe the operation and maintenance (O&M) activities for each response action. In situations where the response action consists of more than one major component, for clarity one worksheet can be completed for each major component. Response Action NamelDesignation: Soil Screening with XRF List all portions of the response action to which this information applies. Describe the O&M and inspection activities that will be required to operate and maintain response action components_ _ Shaw has developed a Standard operating Procedure that is based on the Draft U-S_ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SW-846 Method 6200 Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry For the Determination of Elemental Concentrations in Soil and Sediment (1996 and 1998) with minor modifications based on Shaw Environmental, Inc.'s (Shaw) experience. For this site, we will use the in situ evaluation methodology for field evaluations with 1120 verification through laboratory analysis. Daily calibration of both manufacturer standard reference materials (SRMs) and site -specific SRMs will be used. Please refer to the Shaw SOP and EPA Methods provided in Appendix 1 for additional information on the use of XRF methodology. Applicable portions of these procedures for field verification will be incorporated into this RAP. List and discuss the key operating parameters for a properly functioning response action_ Address how changes in these parameters will result in operating changes, providing sufficient detail to explain how the operator will know the component is functioning properly. Proper calibration of field screening equipment and documentation of confirmation sampling points following impacted soil removal. Calibration logs and periodic confirmation with SRMs will be utilized to confirm that field decisions are reliable. List the routine tasks required to operate the response action. _ Calibration within manufacturer and project specifications_ List the routine tasks required to maintain the response action, including scheduled inspections, maintenance, and component replacement. No long term maintenance is required. TCEQ-103261RAP February 2005 32 BOUNDARY ' 1W-1 1 B SBe34 -, CV 1Ui Vie —1 1 A B-5 N $-9 e B-22 z B-Ge L e m B.-7 B 55--1 1 SS-1 2 G SB-14e o SB-19 SB-18 d SB-13e 0 0 Uj Y J U fl _I- " GP-822 Li c� GP-B21 SS-15 GP-B20 m o a GP-B18J 'GP-B19 SS-16 LEGEND: MW-5 MONITOR WELL ° e SAMPLE BORING LOCATIONS w (1989-2001) o ° RECENT SOIL BORINGS L (2006-2007) SOIL SAMPLES EXCEEDING MSD-ADJUSTED PCLS (V, Cu, Mo, Ni) --�--� -�- FENCE PRAA D r PROPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS I I I T----r---r 10X 10 FIELD CONFIRMATION L SAMPLING GRID I I (confirmed by laboratory verification on 1 /20 frequency) CU. COPPER (PCL=550 mg/Kg) MO. MOLYBDENUM (PCL= 1 60 mg/Kg) V. VANADIUM (PCL=290 mg/Kg) Nk NICKEL (PCL=830 mg/Kg) ALL CONCENTRATIONS PRESENTED IN mg/Kg 1 W- 1 2B 1`--- -*��W_ I 2A IN l t r SDA SB-091. 0 - 50 000 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET DEPTHI PCLE 0.5-6` IV. &: DEPTH I POLE 0-0.5' 1 Ma- 911 DEPTH PCLE 0 5-6` CU.- 748 Mo, .3779 Y: 902 DEPTH PCLE 01' Mo: 1,.060 V 614 DEPTH PCLE 0-0.5. Mo., 480 V. 3,690 6330 COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 190 1RVING. TEXAS 75063 (214) 277--7800 (TEL) >�a (214) 277-8600 (FAX) ATTACHMENT 3A-3 PRAA D PROPOSED MONITORING AND SAMPLING POINTS FORMER AMERICAN CYANAMID VCP # 1359 600 N. JONES STREET FORT WORTH, TEXAS C 0 0 (: 2 cu Q a) C o U) N � I ❑ Y N p ai C � L Q O E U cU U C N ❑ C U O U 0 ❑ E N �O ro ) r � w � 0 (D `❑ a) L o o-'E L O +L E 0—. C f0 �} U� O E U U. O O W � J .0 CT' C O• t� (Si {l5 N x X_ , 'L7 C m 0. Cu ❑ cu m L — a—cr Q �X 0 DEL (D a) 6 c U C UC U o ow y � O •�1 W Y Q 0 ❑ ❑ u; 0 L cm r (D N N C U U U 0 u. C c6 ( j�CL cu [0 cu N N min rn vJ CD 0 co 00C co com a= f) 1 p r- 1 C] rn iA co i— [!1 aND O L E U w m O Q O m (D O U ❑ _ U. O O C �'S^I O L ❑ ❑ m VJ O . ❑ tL) L �Q N N ) C U _E U fa - to �_ to C7 to rn ¢ O �' m O. S7. ❑ ❑ N U � A � w � O o .¢ O r E cu U CO C �Y (6 O U E L U 0 N C (n L w � M w U tr _N (w!J N Ea C O X �o Ol L O E i C D to Z 0 E C (n C � ❑ Y w U U) a 0- N N O >w a � ❑ '' [6 O U) 000 U {) c L U U O O © O" U) N C _ C CL N U N E L Cu o N en N Z m Y Q� Z U CDG) a o. o. x U 0) U) M co LO 0 0 N M 2 .0 d LL d CD 0 6 u1 U F ti 0 0 cm l� 87 LO M t� O z tr m DEPTH PCLE DEPTH PCLE - - - .s.`~ pNTH 0-1' Cu: 1,876 1-3' Cu. 4,360 C"i -- ---- - -- �/f �i/, -- i - Q5' >0 00 ZW a3 o z % z o LEGEND: y ` Mw-5 MONITOR WELL SAMPLE BORING LOCATIONS w ° O (1989-2001) U A. RECENT SOIL BORINGS O (2006--2007) SOIL SAMPLES EXCEEDING MSD-ADJUSTED PCLS (V, Cu, Mo, Ni) p FENCE P RAA C PROPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS T--- ; ---; 10X1 O FIELD CONFIRMATION SAMPLING GRID I (confirmed by laboratory verification on 1/20 frequency) CU. COPPER (PCL=550 mg/Kg) MO. MOLYBDENUM (PCL=160 mg/Kg) V. VANADIUM (PCL=290 mg/Kg) W. NICKEL (PCL=830 mg/Kg) ALL CONCENTRATIONS PRESENTED IN mg/Kg DEPTH PCLE 1 a3' Cu: 26,900 Mo: 218 I� V. 352 ` 0 40 80 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET DEPTH PCLE 0-1' Mo. 234 DEPTH PCLE 0.5-3' Cu. 796 5-10' Cu: 37.2 SS-14 e DEPTH PCLE Mo. 2, 800 0-1 lug: 1,150 5-9' DEPTH PCL 0-2' Mo , 259 Cu: 14400 5-10' Mo: ; 309 V., 11s60 I GP-B21 i i i GP-B18 PCI t Cu: 1,950 Mo: 334 - V, 1,380 Cu. 12, 200 > Rio: 57 , 6,290 = %/. SSe-35 SB-1 3e 6330 COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 1:90 IRVING, TEXAS 75063 (214) 277-7800 (TEL) ' (214) 277-8600 (FAX) ATTACHMENT 4A---2 PRAA C IAP OF CONFIRMATION SAMPLING POINTS FORMER AMERICAN CYANAMID VCP #1359 600 N, JONES STREET FORT WORTH, TEXAS BOUNDARY S Be3 4• N I 00 B—5 e B-22 �+ —9Q8 seL-6 Q-B4s7 r m z IW 1 1 B M W ---1 1 A 55-11 SS-12 9 SB--14e e eSB-1 9 SB-18 SB-1 e f Y �GP-B22 GP-B2 i SS-15 GP-B20 o GP-B18 %P-131 9 SS-16 LEGEND: F� MW-5 MONITOR WELL e SAMPLE BORING LOCATIONS (1989-2001) RECENT SOIL BORINGS (2006-2007) SOIL SAMPLES EXCEEDING MSD--ADJUSTED PCLS (V, Cu, Ma, Ni) FENCE PRAA D as PROPOSED EXCAVATION AREAS I 1OX10 FIELD CONFIRMATION r I 1 SAMPLING GRID (confirmed by laboratory I I verification on 1/20 frequency) CU. COPPER (PCL=550 mg/Kg) W: MOLYBDENUM (PCL=160 mg/Kg) V. VANADIUM (PCL-290 mg/Kg) Nt NICKEL (PCL=830 mg/Kg) ALL CONCENTRATIONS PRESENTED IN mg/Kg MMS— 3 2$ _*vw -12A 0 50 100 {' APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET t I } I DEPTH PCLE++f� ryry 0. 5-6- 1 Y.6. GJQ DEPTH I POLE 0-0.5' I ikr o. 911 DEPTH PCLE CU. 746 05-6' M/o. 379 Y. 902 DEPTH PCLE Mo. 1,060 0-1 V. 614 DEPTH POLE i Mo, 48 3 (i-U.SIv. 3,690 ` 6330 COMMERCE DRIVE SUITE 190 f IRVING, TEXAS 75063 (214) 277-7600 (TEL) (2.14) 277-8600 (FAX) ATTACHMENT 4A-3 P RAA D x MAP OF CONFIRMATION SAMPLING POINTS ' I FORMER AMERICAN CYANAMID VCP #1359 I i 600 N. JONES STREET E FORT WORTH, TEXAS Post -Response Action Care RAP Worksheet 5.0 Associated Information: Attachments 5A-5C ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Complete this worksheet only if Remedy Standard t3 will be used. What is the proposed initial post -response action care period? (default 30 yr.) years If the proposed initial post -response action care period is less than 30 years, provide a technical justification in accordance with 350.33 h . NIA What is the foreseeable land use during the post -response action care period? Describe how the future use of the property will not compromise the integrity of the physical controls, will not interfere with the function of the monitoring systems, will not pose a threat to human health or the environment, and will be in accordance with any institutional controls. Briefly describe the proposed post -response action care activities. Describe the type of monitoring and/or inspections to be performed. Discuss the rationale for not including COC(s) analyzed during the response action, monitoring or sampling point location, frequency of monitoring and/or inspections, and the duration of the monitorina nroaram_ Will PRAC sampling procedures be the same as those as previously documented for monitoring and/ or confirmation sampling? Yes No If no, provide in Appendix 6 a description of the monitoring or sampling collection procedures to be conducted during the post -response action care period. Cost Estimate Complete this portion of the form only if a physical control is proposed (installed hydraulic control system, slurry wall, cap, etc.). Provide in Attachment 5t3 a detailed cost estimate for a third party to operate and maintain the physical control during the PRAC period, based on current dollar amount. Specify the physical control to which this information applies Complete this worksheet for each physical control that will be used as part of the response action. What is the total estimated annual cost of O&M for the PRAC period? $ What is the total estimated cost for a third party to perform PRAC activities? $ Identify the type of financial assurance mechanism to be used, and the contact person managing fiduciary responsibility, if known. Does the person meet the criteria and definition of a small business? (see §350.33(n)) _Yes _No If yes and the person desires to pursue the reduced amount of financial assurance, provide a legally binding affidavit as Attachment 5C. Include in the affidavit the information requested in 30 TAG §350.33(l), (m), and (n)_ An example affidavit is attached in the instructions. TCEQ-10326/RAP February 2005 35 Implementation Schedule RAP Worksheet 6.0 ID No.: 1359 March 2007 Document the proposed schedule for implementing the response action. Include all major response action activities through the life of the project, including all removal, decontamination, and control actions, component List the proposed schedule for report submittals. Add additional lines if more reports than listed will be needed to complete the response action. Reports Submittal date -Response Action Effectiveness Report RAER RAER submittal number 1 RAER submittal number 2 RAER submittal number 3 Response Action Completion Report (RACR) 60-days following completion of site work. Post -Response Action Care Report PRACR PRACR submittal number 1 PRACR submittal number 2 PRACR submittal number 3 TCEQ-10326/RAP February 2005 36 h ' Shaw Environmental, Inc. 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 214-277-7800 FAX: 214-277-8600 Appendix 1 References Lr11__11__! i � Shaw E & I Procedure No. El-FS200 Revision No. 1 Date of Revision 9122/2006 Page I of 4 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Subject, Screening for Metals via X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometry 1. PURPOSE 2. KI 4- This procedure is intended to provide general guidance for the analysis of samples using X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) methods_ XRF can be used to screen for a variety of metals (Attachment 1) in environmental sample matrices that include soils, air filters, and solid surfaces and materials including dried filter papers, and to screen for lead -based paint (LBP). The XRF technique has been accepted by the U-S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for screening of samples during investigative and remediation actions and is published in SW-846 as Method 6200. SCOPE This procedure is applicable to all Shaw E & 1 efforts where metals are to be determined using XRF methods. It is intended to act primarily as a guideline for the use and applicable Quality Control requirements of this technique. This procedure is not intended to replace the applicable manufacturer's information/procedures or those in SW-846, and it also does not present expanded detail on sample preparation. XRF is a surface analysis technique and as such, higher confidence data is achieved when solid samples, especially soil samples, are homogenized and reduced to consistent particle -size mixtures by drying, grinding, and sieving_ Shaw E & I owns a NITON Model XL-703 XRF system with three sources, expanded analyte capabilities, and the filter holder assembly. Contact the Electronics Department in Findlay, Ohio for availability. REFERENCES Field Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry for the Determination of Elemental Concentrations in Soil and Sediment Method 6200, Revision 0, 1998, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste PhysicaWhemical Methods, SW-846, Third Edition, January. • Instrument Manual for Spectrace Model 9000 XRF, TN Technologies. ■ Instrument Manual for Niton 700 Series Systems, Niton Inc. DEFINITIONS • X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRFj---An analytical technique whereby the sample is exposed to high energy radiation from a radioactive source(s) forcing the ejection of an electron from the target metal specie(s)_ The vacant space is quickly filled in by another electron from a higher energy shell, with the excess energy released in the form of an X-ray measured in kiloelectron volts (keln characteristic for a particular metal species_ • System Blank A manufacturer -supplied non-metal implement, such as a Teflon""" or SiO2 plug, that is placed into the detector and analyzed to evaluate system contamination and scatter. • Energy Standard —A manufacturer -supplied solid metal implement that is analyzed to verify system performance and background correction algorithms. This document contains proprietary information of Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure Inc- Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. retains all rights associated with theses materials, which may not be reproduced without express written permission of the company. Procedure No. El-FS200 Revision No. 1 tL.„�.,,. Date of Revision 9/22/2006 Shaw Shaw E & I Page 2 of 4 ■ Standard Reference Material (SRM) An environmental matrix material containing a known and traceable concentration of analyte(s), usually traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST)_ It is used to verify analytical accuracy of the system. ■ Site -Specific Calibration —A calibration process which uses samples from the site itself to develop a calibration curve_ Each sample is analyzed by a Definitive method (SW-846) to establish the "true" value. Site -specific calibrations factor in the effect of the site matrix on results and provide better comparison to Definitive data. At least one of the "standards" should be at a concentration near the site action level(s). ■ Sample Cup ---A small plastic or PFE container designed to hold a prepared sail sample and introduce it to the instrument_ Sample cups are usually covered with a clear film (MylarTM) which is secured using a plastic ring- S . RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Procedure Responsibility The Field Sampling Discipline Lead is responsible for maintenance, management, and revision of this procedure_ Questions, comments, or suggestions regarding this technical SOP should be directed to the Field Sampling Discipline Lead. 5.2 Project Responsibility Shaw employees performing this task, or any portion thereof, are responsible for meeting the requirements of this procedure. Shaw employees conducting technical review of task performance are also responsible for following appropriate portions of this SOP_ For those projects where the activities of this SOP are conducted, the Project Manager, or designee, is responsible for ensuring that those activities are conducted in accordance with this and other appropriate procedures. Project participants are responsible for documenting information in sufficient detail to provide objective documentation (i.e. checkprints, calculations, reports, etc.) that the requirements of this SOP have been met. Such documentation shall be retained as project records. 6. PROCEDURE Safety Notes: XRF instruments contain radioactive sources), and the ionizing radiation is hazardous. Do not remove shielding or disassemble instruments beyond the user maintenance dictated in the instrument manual. Never place a hand or other body part in the path of the source, and always operate it with its shield closed, with its safety shutter (if applicable) locked, or with the sensor window hold tight against a surface; do not look directly at the beam_ Some systems utilize cryogenic cooling systems, and appropriate precautions should be taken during operation. These instruments contain regulated radioactive sources and require licensing and specific radioactive licensee procedures for use. In several states, XRF units are considered controlled sources and are subject to state radioactive regulations including specific training for all persons using the instrument, posting of radioactive safety procedures, isolation of work areas, and issuance of state radioactive licenses and permits. Several states require persons transporting, receiving, and/or operating the XRF to attend a Safety Training course every two years for properly handling an instrument containing radioactive sources. Shaw personnel using this type of instrument for the first time must attend the manufacturer's Safety Training course or be trained by a certified Shaw representative_ Manufacturers will not send instruments containing regulated radioactive sources to a project site without a competent person as required by their Specific License and General License with an Agreement State where analysis will be performed. For This document contains proprietary information or Shaw Environmental & infrastructure Inc. Shaw Environmental & infrastructure, Inc: retains all rights associated with theses materials, which may not be reproduced without express written permission of the company. Procedure No. El-FS200 Revision No. 1 - Date of Revision 9/22/2006 aW' Shaw E & I Page 3 of 4 additional information or assistance in dealing with licensing and/or shipment issues, contact the manufacturer, the leasing agent, or the Radiation Control Officer at the Shaw Oakridge, TN facility_ 6.1 General Information Sensitivity is a function of the instrument count time. Consult the manual to establish a count time that provides the needed sensitivity while allowing for sample throughput efficiency. Typical count times are 60 to 180 seconds_ XRF instruments can be used to screen for metals in filters and filter papers by placing the filter or a portion thereof in the detector and analyzing it. On some systems, a filter holder is used. The filter position, with regards to the detector, should be altered at least three times and the average of the three readings used to determine the result. Solid surfaces, such as painted walls, are analyzed by holding the unit against the surface and collecting readings or by placing chips into the detector. Again, the average of three readings should be calculated for each result. Soils can be analyzed by either in situ or ex situ methods depending upon the Data Quality Objectives and data use. In situ analysis can be performed by simply placing the detector onto or over the ground surface and collecting data. However, since XRF is a surface detection technique, it is advisable to at least remove, mix, and sieve a small pile of soil to provide a more consistent matrix. Ex situ analysis involves thorough drying, grinding, mixing, and sieving of the sample and placing it into a sample cup for introduction to the instrument_ XRF instruments are quantitative screening instruments and in most instances provide non - definitive screening data that must be confirmed by definitive methods. They can, however, be utilized for confirmation in well-defined remedial actions governed by detailed approved plans and applicable quality objectives. Use of the method for confirmatory purposes requires enhancements such as site -specific calibration over multiple points, regular QC checks, adjustments of the site -specific curve/Definitive method relationship via split sample analysis, and defined confidence windows for grey -area data. All of these elements should be detailed and defined in a project -specific plan. 6_2 General Operation Record all data onto a log sheet or log book_ Allow the instrument to warm-up for 15 to 30 minutes before use. Perform any manufacturer -specified background (scatter) and internal calibration checks using the supplied materials. If the system fails the background check, clean the window and repeat. If the internal calibration check fails, consult the manual to determine how to perform an Energy Calibration_ Do not use an instrument that fails either the background check or internal calibration criteria. a Prior to analyzing any samples, analyze all of the required QC samples and compare to the project criteria. Do not proceed to project samples until QC meets criteria. QC samples in sample cups should be tilted to remix the contents before analysis. Proceed with sample analysis. Higher confidence data from soils in sample cups is achieved if each cup is analyzed in duplicate. Tilt the cup to remix the material between each analysis. Report the result as the average of the two values, provided they differ by less than 25%_ If they differ by more than 25%, sample preparation methods should be reviewed_ This document contains proprietary Information of Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure Inc. Shaw Environmental & infrastructure, Inc. retains all rights associated with theses materials, which may not be reproduced without express written permission of the company. Procedure No. EI-FS200 Revision No. 1 Date of Revision 6.43W Page 9/22/2006 4 of 4 Straw E & I Analyze a calibration check after every ten sample analyses, following any extended down period, and at the end of the analysis day/shift or as specified in the project plans. Download data if required, turn oft the analyzer, clean the window, and property store the instrument when finished. Systems that use batteries should be left on their chargers overnight_ Those equipped with safety shutters should always be stored with the shutter in the locked position. 6.3 Quality Control Quality Control requirements vary depending upon data use and the DQOs necessary and should be defined in a project -specific plan. At a minimum, QC should include analysis of blanks, calibration checks (SRNs or known value samples), and replicate samples. Confirmatory use requires more extensive QC efforts. A site -specific calibration should be performed by split analyzing prepared samples in duplicate by XRF and off -site definitive methods. The results are used to develop a site -specific XRF/Definitive method correlation and calibration curve. Daily QC should include the analysis of blanks, at least three of the site - specific calibration standards bracketing the expected concentration ranges, replicates, and a check sample or SRM. The correlation should be verified and, if necessary, adjusted on a defined sample analysis or time frequency. 7. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1, List of XRF Analytes and Typical Instrument Detection Limits Attachment 2, List of Available SRMs and Properties 8. FORMS a XRF Calibration Form ■ XRF Laboratory Sample Results Form a XRF Summary of Results This document contains proprietary information or Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure Inc. Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. retains all rights associated with theses materials, which may not be reproduced without express written permission of the company. Procedure No. El-FS200 Attachment No. 1 SSW' Shaw E & I Attachment 1 List of XRF Analytes and Typical Instrument Detection Limits Element Typical Reporting Limits for Each Radioactive Source (mg/kg) Fe-55 Cd-109 Am-241 Sulfur 1,500 50 � Chlorine 450 Potassium 160 Calcium 70 Titanium 55 Chromium 90 260 Manganese 205 Iron 110 Cobalt 100 Nickel 65 Copper 45 Zinc 35 Mercury 30 Arsenic 25 Selenium 15 Lead 15 Rubidium 5 Strontium 4 Zirconium 3 Molybdenum 4 Cadmium Tin 85 Antimony 45 Barium 30 Silver 9 i-Typicallyachievable in a clean, silica sand matrix. Actual sample detection limits will be higher due to the sample matrix interferences. mg/kg - Milligrams per kilogram, Page1 of 1 Procedure No. El-FS200 Attachment No- 2 W"' Shaw E&3 Attachment 2 List of Available SRMs and Properties Available SRMs I Shaw Owned -Comparisons Helps? SRM ID Cost I Quart I Metal I Conc Shaw Current XRr RLffiource Yes70KlNa7 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 Ag 306 353 (2710) < 9 (Am) Y 2702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 As 453 22.23.4, IOS, 626, 1550 <20 (Cd) Y 2780 - Hard Rode $ 315 50 As 48.8 22, 23.4. 105, 626, 1550 <20 (Cd) Y 1648-Urban PM $ 218 2 Cd 75 41.7(2711) <50(Am) Y 2702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Ni 75-4 (751(2586) <65 {Cd) Y 2781 -Dorn Sludge $ 294 40 Nr 802 (75) (2586) <65 (Cd) Y 1648 - Urban PM $ 218 2 Ni 82 (75) (2586) <65 (Cd) Y 2709 - San J- Soil $ 271 50 Ni 88 (75) (2586) <65 (Cd) Y 2781 - Dom Sludge $ 294 40 Ag 98 35.3 (2710) < 9 (Am) Y 2709 - San J. Sail $ 271 50 Zn 106 350. 352, 438, 6952 <35 (Cd) Y 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 Ni 154.1 (75) (2586) -65 (Cd) Y 2780 - Hard Rod( $ 315 50 Sb 160 J 38 4 (2710) <45 (Am) Y 2181 -Dom Sludge $ 294 40 Pb 202.1 156, 161, 432, 1162. 5532 <15 (Cd) Y 2780 - Hard Rock $ 315 50 Cu 215.5 (61), 98.6, 114. 2950 <45 (Cd) Y 1944 - NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 Cu 300 (811. 98.6, 114. 2950 145 (Cd) Y 1648 - Urban PM $ 218 2 Cr 403 301 (2586) <300 (Cd) Y 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 Pb 574 15.6. 161. 432, 1162, 5532 <15 (Cd) Y 1648 - Urban PM $ 218 2 Cu 609 (81). 98 6, 114, 2950 <45 (Cd) Y 2781 - Dom Sludge $ 294 40 Cu 627.4 (81), 98.6, 114, 2950 145 (Cd) Y 1944 - NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 Zn 656 350, 352, 436, 6952 135 (Cd) Y 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 Zn 1254 350, 352, 436, 6952 <35 (Cd) Y 2781 - Dom Sludge $ 294 40 Zn 1273 350, 352, 438, 6952 <35 (Cd) Y 2780 - Hard Rock $ 315 50 Zn 2570 350. 352, 438, 6952 <35 (Cd) Y 2587 - Tr Elam in Sa1A.RP $ 266 55 Pb 3242 15.6. 161, 432, 1162. 5532 <15 (cd) Y 1648 - Urban PM $ 218 2 Zn 4760 350, 352, 438, 6952 <35 (Cd) Y 2709 - San J- Soil $ 271 50 As 17.7 22. 23.4. 105, 626, 1550 <20 (Cd) O 2709 -Sao J. Soil $ 211 50 Pb 18.9 15 6,161. 432, 1167, 5532 <15 (Cd) O 1944 - NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 As 18.9 22, 23.4, 105, 626, 1550 <20 (Cd) O 27BO - Hard Rock $ 3t5 50 Ag 27 J 35.3 (2710) < 9 (Am) O 1648 - Urban PM $ 218 2 Sb 45 J 38.4 {2710) <45 (Am) O 1944 - NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 Ni 76-1 (75) (2586) <65 (Cd) 0 1648 - Urban PM $ 219 2 As 115 22, 23.4, 105, 626, 1550 <20 (Cd) 0 2702 - Madne, Sediment $ 318 50 Cu 117.7 (81), 98.6, 114, 2950 <45 (Cd) O 7702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Pb 132.6 15-6. 161. 432, 1162, 5532 <15 (Cd) O 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 As 166 22, 23.4, 105, 626, 1550 <20 (Cd) O 1944 - NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 Cr 266 301 (2586) <300 (Cd) 0 1944 -NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 Pb 330 156, 161, 432, 1162, 5532 <15 {Cd) O 2587 - Tr Elam in Sol7L6P $ 266 55 Zn 335.8 350. 352, 438, 6952 <35 (Cd) 0 2702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Cr 352 301 (2586) <300 (Cd) 0 2702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Zn 485.3 350, 352, 438, 6952 <35 (Cd) 0 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 Cu 2594 (61), 98.6, 1 i4, 2950 <45 (Cd) O 2780 - Hard Rock $ 315 50 Pb 5770 15 6, 161, 432, 1162. 5532 <15 (Cd) O 1648 - Urban PM $ 218 2 Pb 6550 15 6, 161, 432, 1162, 5532 <15 (Cd) O 2180 - Hard Rock $ 315 50 Hg 1 U 32.6, 140 <30 (Cd) N 2587 - Tr Elem in SoiltLOP $ 266 55 Hg i U 32.6. 140 <30 (Cd) N 2702-Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Cd i U 41.7(2711) <50(Am) N 2702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Hg I U 32.6, 140 <30 (Cd) N 2702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Ag 1 35.3 (2710) < 9 (Am) N 2709 - San J. Soil $ 271 50 Gd i U 417 (2711) 50 (Am) N 2709 -San J- Sail $ 271 50 Ag 1 U 35.3 {2710) < 9 (Am) N 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 Hg 1.1 32-6, 140 <30 (Cd) N 2100 - San J. Soil $ 271 50 Hg 1.4 326.140 <30 (Cd) N 2587 -Tr Elam in Soi11LBP $ 266 55 Cd 1.92 41.7 (2711) < 50 (Am) N 1944 - NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 Hg 34 32.6, 14D <30 (Cd) N 2781 -Dom Sludge $ 294 40 Hg 364 326.140 <30 (Cd) N 2782 - Ind Sludge $ 341 70 Cd 4-17 41.7 (2711) 150 (Am) N 1944 - NYINJ Sediment $ 424 50 Sb 5 J 38.4 (2710) <45 (Am) N 2702 - Marine Sediment $ 318 50 Sb 5.6 38,4(2710) 145 (Am) N Page 1 of 1 y Shaw E & ! XRF Calibration Form (Fs200.1 _0) ! cIw Name - CRY, State P-wa No Adti,LLumher: Conttect Tat. I Ghent Name Cast Cod. -Add Nu-Eor (. lvu(al CU" align V.X.: Dnte _ Chet(, XRF dock IC XRFa.arm-up Tan- ._� Agree? >15 mtn' Yes H. Yes Na internal-hb-non complete? Yas Na Comments Retard energy resolution eV S—'.sk-oh. nscl 2, Stnrtbt-D.y C.Ith-sivn_ 1ewe�Cd-ld4 w'i�8""b'le ese lEae P6. Ce ca&rdwt[Am-241.Ab�e:fifer fb Sources Hied (cn�.,s;,fdwt apptvkCo-fu9 NA Fe -SS IaA Am-241 [flank-Si(3 s- Caaxd: _cee 1:1 11—te Lead -NISI 2711, comd:_scc Conc m < DLs m % RPP lamm FCarldled Detec[ed 46rnt� t J Element Cerbl-ed ❑elotled Ac®pt� kz-;�':, 28 M- [ 7, _ Oehcr socirls. Z.n(<ap} As (t3D! Oeber metelsZn (33t7-41 rs (iD37 "d-33)-J_Cr {�3130)_ _, _ .. Hg ([35)— e=(c]lllil.T--_____._-_____ L.- Lead -NISI 25t6- c�.c �c r% _ Hi k lxad-1�115'1' 2.718� Cat m- _u (�nr. m RPb C-nnc 1PE � V. RPD Element j Cettdmd Dateded A ter? _ Element Cerldied betecte� r�apra 32 EE 61 ` Gtiz 2,95u Hi P; Hi 14.3 Othcrmetelc.3.(35Z1 As[IR9)—. OHKrnmdr Z.ds.9511�. As(6261� Ha(c35] fr(3011 Ifd7Lbl_.G(<3W) Cumme nts: ^Mde H[Srcerteedve7tz 3a_ Cantivuivg Cafi6[.lion Data. Date- ch-k XRFdock (r XRF warm-up Tme- Agree? >15 mint Yes U. M(A Yes K. [neernal rnkbralion rnnxp[ete? Yes No Comments: Record energyresolutton: eV Svvrce 5kengu.- mGl ]6. Continuing Cal3ra[inta Dala_ Dak•' Ch-k XRFrktrk. I r XRF mermyrp Time Agree a "I, Yes K. MIA Yes No Infernal ca,b-ftoa-.plate? Yes Hq C- roars___._--.__-..___.__--__.-..._-..___. _ Record e—gy rnsoluu— eV 4. Ead-vi-Dny Cali6ralivm: Dale. Check XRF clock. Is XRFwacm-up Time: Agree? >i5 rninl V- My N/A Yes No Internal cakb-non-mPlete.> Yes Mn Colnmen[r. Record energy resoluion_ eV Source Strengih. -cti H lank-SiOs, Gcwr:scc 2.Sode[ate Lead-H2ST 2711, Comm_sec Cone < Du Cone m '/. RPD Element G�rtred Deleacd Aoccp['+ Element Ceritt(ed Deze:md Ac Ph < 25 P6 t-lfi2 cu 114 Ni < 7i Hi r 7g H�<35)T� CrC�1m) Mg(�331� Cr(r3Df3) - 1rw Legd-N[ST 25i6 k:aegt H k.Lead-MIST 2739� Ua �% Conc m % RPD Conc RP❑ Element Cerdl(ed Doteded m Aw1ra Elemen[ Certified Dareded A P6 432 P13 5.532 Cu el.` Cu 29se M- 75' Hi 14.3 OrhernMelrZn (152] As(EB.9)� Dtba..w;t<Fr 1.d6.95Z1 As(t;2G) Hdcr,)J l'i (Ill ll Hd3L61 .Cr(<30P) Comments.- Form Camplefed by 5W.0- D- Page 1 of 1 Shaw E & XRF Laboratory Sample Results Fora (FS200.2_0) Site Name - City, State Project No: Add1(rtmha ConhactTitle J Client name 1_ General Sample Location and Identification: Sample Loc/Description: P-A-) (twe) Location comments' Sample Associated QC: Number: Cost Code: Add Number (&cIeane): Floor Sidewall Other (if "other" descnbe): to (excavation depth,ft) Date: Time: 2_ Sample Preparation: (Check all that apply) [n situ Drying Crushing Coarse Sieve (panprep) (Temp--Cfor _hes) (n)'2mm) Sample Prep Comments{Tar Observed? 3_ Analytical Results: (allwMsareppm) Source(sy Gd-109 X count: sec Measurement Date: Fe -SS NA cat:__MA.,_,sec Time: Am-241 NA cmmt:_MA_sec [Original Analysis Conc Std Dev Pb As Cu Zn Otfter Metals (Ni, li Comments: 4_ Analytical Team: Dup Andlysis* RPD % Comment Conc Std Dev "Itper united Form Completed by: Signature Date Page I of 1 y 7 d-+ U QS CD o .:' O t) 0 lE N Q1 E � E. V R 7 � [L CA w X CO w METHOD 6200 FIELD PORTABLE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ELEMENTAL_ CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1 A This method is applicable to the in situ and intrusive analysis of the 26 analytes listed in Table 1 for soil and sediment samples. Some common elements are not listed in Table 1 because they are considered "light" elements that cannot be detected by field portable x-ray fluorescence (FPXRF). They are: lithium, beryllium, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, silicon, and phosphorus. Most of the analytes listed in Table 1 are of environmental concern, while a few others have interference effects or change the elemental composition of the matrix, affecting quantitation of the analytes of interest. Generally elements of atomic number 16 or greater can be detected and quantitated by FPXRF. 1.2 Detection limits depend on several factors, the analyte of interest, the type of detector used, the type of excitation source, the strength of the excitation source, count times used to irradiate the sample, physical matrix effects, chemical matrix effects, and interelement spectral interferences. General instrument detection limits for analytes of interest in environmental applications are shown in Table 1. These detection limits apply to a clean matrix of quartz sand (silicon dioxide) free of interelement spectral interferences using long (600-second) count times. These detection limits are given for guidance only and will vary depending on the sample matrix, which instrument is used, and operating conditions. A discussion of field performance -based detection limits is presented in Section 13.4 of this method. The clean matrix and field performance -based detection limits should be used for general planning purposes, and a third detection limit discussed, based on the standard deviation around single measurements, should be used in assessing data quality_ This detection limit is discussed in Sections 9.7 and 11.3. 1.3 Use of this method is restricted to personnel either trained and knowledgeable in the operation of an XRF instrument or under the supervision of a trained and knowledgeable individual. This method is a screening method to be used with confirmatory analysis using EPA -approved methods. This method's main strength is as a rapid field screening procedure. The method detection limits (MOL) of FPXRF are above the toxicity characteristic regulatory level for most RCRA analytes. If the precision, accuracy, and detection limits of FPXRF meet the data quality objectives (DQOs) of your project, then XRF is a fast, powerful, cost effective technology for site characterization. 2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD 2.1 The FPXRF technologies described in this method use sealed radioisotope sources to irradiate samples with x-rays. X-ray tubes are used to irradiate samples in the laboratory and are beginning to be incorporated into field portable instruments. When a sample is irradiated with x-rays, the source x-rays may undergo either scattering or absorption by sample atoms_ This later process is known as the photoelectric effect. When an atom absorbs the source x-rays, the incident radiation dislodges electrons from the innermost shells of the atom, creating vacancies. The electron vacancies are filled by electrons cascading in from outerelectron shells. Electrons in outer shells have higher energy states than inner shell electrons, and the outer shell electrons give off energy as they cascade down into the inner shell vacancies. This rearrangement of electrons CD-ROM 6200 - 1 Revision 0 January 1998 results in emission of x-rays characteristic of the given atom. The emission of x-rays, in this manner, is termed x-ray fluorescence_ Three electron shells are generally involved in emission of x-rays during FPXRF analysis of environmental samples. the K, L, and M shells. A typical emission pattern, also called an emission spectrum, for a given metal has multiple intensity peaks generated from the emission of K, L, or M shell electrons. The most commonly measured x-ray emissions are from the K and L shells; only metals with an atomic number greater than 57 have measurable M shell emissions. Each characteristic x-ray line is defined with the letter K, L, or M, which signifies which shell had the original vacancy and by a subscript alpha (a) or beta (R), which indicates the higher shell from which electrons fell to fill the vacancy and produce the x-ray. For example, a Ka line is produced by a vacancy in the K shell filled by an L shell electron, whereas a KR line is produced by a vacancy in the K shell filled by an M shell electron. The KQ transition is on average 6 to 7 times more probable than the KR transition; therefore, the Ka line is approximately 7 times more intense than the Kp line for a given element, making the Ka tine the choice for quantitation purposes. The K lines for a given element are the most energetic lines and are the preferred lines for analysis. For a given atom, the x-rays emitted from L transitions are always less energetic than those emitted from K transitions. Unlike the K lines, the main L emission lines (La and L.) for an element are of nearly equal intensity. The choice of one or the other depends on what interfering element lines might be present. The L emission lines are useful for analyses involving elements of atomic number (Z) 58 (cerium) through 92 (uranium). An x-ray source can excite characteristic x-rays from an element only if the source energy is greater than the absorption edge energy for the particular line group of the element, that is, the K absorption edge, L absorption edge, or M absorption edge energy. The absorption edge energy is somewhat greater than the corresponding line energy. Actually, the K absorption edge energy is approximately the sum of the K, L, and M line energies of the particular element, and the L absorption edge energy is approximately the sum of the L and M line energies. FPXRF is more sensitive to an element with an absorption edge energy close to but less than the excitation energy of the source. For example, when using a cadmium-109 source, which has an excitation energy of 22.1 kiloelectron volts (keV), FPXRF would exhibit better sensitivity for zirconium which has a K line energy of 15.7 keV than to chromium, which has a K line energy of 5.41 keV. 2.2 Under this method, inorganic analytes of interest are identified and quantitated using a field portable energy -dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectrometer. Radiation from one or more radioisotope sources or an electrically excited x-ray tube is used to generate characteristic x-ray emissions from elements in a sample. Up to three sources may be used to irradiate a sample. Each source emits a specific set of primary x-rays that excite a corresponding range of elements in a sample. When more than one source can excite the element of interest, the source is selected according to its excitation efficiency for the element of interest. For measurement, the sample is positioned in front of the probe window. This can be done in two manners using FPXRF instruments: in situ or intrusive. If operated in the in situ mode, the probe window is placed in direct contact with the soil surface to be analyzed. When an FPXRF instrument is operated in the intrusive mode, a soil or sediment sample must be collected, prepared, and placed in a sample cup. The sample cup is then placed on top of the window inside a protective cover for analysis. CD-ROM 6200 - 2 Revision 0 January 1998 Sample analysis is then initiated by exposing the sample to primary radiation from the source. Fluorescent and backscattered x-rays from the sample enter through the detector window and are converted into electric pulses in the detector. The detector in FPXRF instruments is Usually either a solid-state detector or a gas -filled proportional counter. Within the detector, energies of the characteristic x-rays are converted into a train of electric pulses, the amplitudes of which are linearly proportional to the energy of the x-rays. An electronic multichannel analyzer (MCA) measures the pulse amplitudes, which is the basis of qualitative x-ray analysis. The number of counts at a given energy per unit of time is representative of the element concentration in a sample and is the basis for quantitative analysis_ Most FPXRF instruments are menu -driven from software built into the units or from personal computers (PC). The measurement time of each source is user -selectable. Shorter source measurement times (30 seconds) are generally used for initial screening and hot spot delineation, and longer measurement times (up to 300 seconds) are typically used to meet higher precision and accuracy requirements. FPXRF instruments can be calibrated using the following methods: internally using fundamental parameters determined by the manufacturer, empirically based on site -specific calibration standards (SSCS), or based on Compton peak ratios. The Compton peak is produced by backscattering of the source radiation. Some FPXRF instruments can be calibrated using multiple methods. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 FPXRF: Field portable x-ray fluorescence. 3.2 MCA: Multichannel analyzer for measuring pulse amplitude. 3.3 SSCS: Site specific calibration standard. 3.4 FP: Fundamental parameter. 3.5 ROL Region of interest. 3.6 SRM: Standard reference material. A standard containing certified amounts of metals in soil or sediment. 3.7 eV: Electron Volt. A unit of energy equivalent to the amount of energy gained by an electron passing through a potential difference of one volt. 3.8 Refer to Chapter One and Chapter Three for additional definitions. 4.0 INTERFERENCES 4.1 The total method error for FPXRF analysis is defined as the square root of the sum of squares of both instrument precision and user- or application -related error. Generally, instrument precision is the least significant source of error in FPXRF analysis. User- or application -related error is generally more significant and varies with each site and method used. Some sources of interference can be minimized or controlled by the instrument operator, but others cannot. Common sources of user- or application -related error are discussed below. CD-ROM 6200 - 3 Revision 0 January 1998 4.2 Physical matrix effects result from variations in the physical character of the sample_ These variations may include such parameters as particle size, uniformity, homogeneity, and surface condition. For example, if any analyte exists in the form of very fine particles in a coarser - grained matrix, the analyte's concentration measured by the FPXRF will vary depending on how fine particles are distributed within the coarser -grained matrix. If the fine particles "settle" to the bottom of the sample cup, the analyte concentration measurement will be higher than if the fine particles are not mixed in well and stay on top of the coarser -grained particles in the sample cup. One way to reduce such error is to grind and sieve all soil samples to a uniform particle size thus reducing sample -to -sample particle size variability. Homogeneity is always a concern when dealing with soil samples. Every effort should be made to thoroughly mix and homogenize soil samples before analysis. Field studies have shown heterogeneity of the sample generally has the largest impact on comparability with confirmatory samples. 4.3 Moisture content may affect the accuracy of analysis of soil and sediment sample analyses. When the moisture content is between 5 and 20 percent, the overall error from moisture may be minimal. However, moisture content may be a major source of error when analyzing samples of surface soil or sediment that are saturated with water. This error can be minimized by drying the samples in a convection or toaster oven. Microwave drying is not recommended because field studies have shown that microwave drying can increase variability between FPXRF data and confirmatory analysis and because metal fragments in the sample can cause arcing to occur in a microwave_ 4.4 Inconsistent positioning of samples in front of the probe window is a potential source of error because the x-ray signal decreases as the distance from the radioactive source increases. This error is minimized by maintaining the same distance between the window and each sample. For the best results, the window of the probe should be in direct contact with the sample, which means that the sample should be flat and smooth to provide a good contact surface. 4.5 Chemical matrix effects result from differences in the concentrations of interfering elements. These effects occur as either spectral interferences (peak overlaps) or as x-ray absorption and enhancement phenomena. Both effects are common in soils contaminated with heavy metals. As examples of absorption and enhancement effects; iron (Fe) tends to absorb copper (Cu) x-rays, reducing the intensity of the Cu measured by the detector, while chromium (Cr) will be enhanced at the expense of Fe because the absorption edge of Cr is slightly lower in energy than the fluorescent peak of iron. The effects can be corrected mathematically through the use of fundamental parameter (FP) coefficients. The effects also can be compensated for using SSCS, which contain all the elements present on site that can interfere with one another. 4.6 When present in a sample, certain x-ray lines from different elements can be very close in energy and, therefore, can cause interference by producing a severely overlapped spectrum. The degree to which a detector can resolve the two different peaks depends on the energy resolution of the detector. If the energy difference between the two peaks in electron volts is less than the resolution of the detector in electron volts, then the detector will not be able to fully resolve the peaks. The most common spectrum overlaps involve the K, line of element Z-1 with the Ka line of element Z. This is called the K,IK¢ interference_ Because the K,,:f<, intensity ratio for a given element usually is about 7:1, the interfering element, Z-'l, must be present at large concentrations to cause a problem. Two examples of this type of spectral interference involve the presence of large concentrations of vanadium (V) when attempting to measure Cr or the presence of large concentrations of Fe when attempting to measure cobalt (Co). The V Ka, and KR energies are 4.95 CD-ROM 6200 - 4 Revision 0 January 1998 and 5.43 keV, respectively, and the Cr Ka energy is 5.41 keV. The Fe Ka and KR energies are 6.40 and 7.06 keV, respectively, and the Co Ka energy is 6.92 keV_ The difference between the V Kg and Cr K,, energies is 20 eV, and the difference between the Fe Ka and the Co Ka energies is 140 W. The resolution of the highest -resolution detectors in FPXRF instruments is 170 eV. Therefore, large amounts of V and Fe will interfere with quantitation of Cr or Co, respectively. The presence of Fe is a frequent problem because it is often found in soils at tens of thousands of parts per million (ppm)• 4.7 Other interferences can arise from K/L, WK and UM line overlaps, although these overlaps are less common. Examples of such overlap involve arsenic, (As) K,,/lead (Pb) L,, and sulfur (S) K,/Pb M, In the As/Pb case, Pb can be measured from the Pb La line, and As can be measured from either the As Ka or the As K, line; in this way the interference can be corrected_ If the As Ki, line is used, sensitivity will be decreased by a factor of two to five times because it is a less intense line than the As Kq line_ If the As Ka line is used in the presence of Pb, mathematical corrections within the instrument software can be used to subtract out the Pb interference. However, because of the limits of mathematical corrections, As concentrations cannot be efficiently calculated for samples with Pb:As ratios of 10:1 or more. This high ratio of Pb to As may result in no As being reported regardless of the actual concentration present. No instrument can fully compensate for this interference. It is important for an operator to understand this limitation of FPXRF instruments and consult with the manufacturer of the FPXRF instrument to evaluate options to minimize this limitation. The operator's decision will be based on action levels for metals in soil established for the site, matrix effects, capabilities of the instrument, data quality objectives, and the ratio of lead to arsenic known to be present at the site. If a site is encountered that contains lead at concentrations greater than ten times the concentration of arsenic it is advisable that all critical soil samples be sent off site for confirmatory analysis by an EPA -approved method. 4.8 If SSCS are used to calibrate an FPXRF instrument, the samples collected must be representative of the site under investigation. Representative soil sampling ensures that a sample or group of samples accurately reflects the concentrations of the contaminants of concern at a given time and location. Analytical results for representative samples reflect variations in the presence and concentration ranges of contaminants throughout a site. Variables affecting sample representativeness include differences in soil type, contaminant concentration variability, sample collection and preparation variability, and analytical variability, all of which should be minimized as much as possible. 4.9 Soil physical and chemical effects may be corrected using SSCS that have been analyzed by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) or atomic absorption (AA) methods. However, a major source of error can be introduced if these samples are not representative of the site or if the analytical error is large. Another concern is the type of digestion procedure used to prepare the soil samples for the reference analysis. Analytical results for the confirmatory method will vary depending on whether a partial digestion procedure, such as SW-846 Method 3050, or a total digestion procedure, such as Method 3052 is used. It is known that depending on the nature of the soil or sediment, Method 3050 will achieve differing extraction efficiencies for different analytes of interest. The confirmatory method should meet the project data quality objectives_ XRF measures the total concentration of an element; therefore, to achieve the greatest comparability of this method with the reference method (reduced bias), a total digestion procedure should be used for sample preparation. However, in the study used to generate the performance data for this method, the confirmatory method used was Method 3050, and the FPXRF data CD-ROM 6200 _ 5 Revision 0 January 1998 compared very well with regression correlation coefficients (r2 often exceeding 0.95, except for barium and chromium. See Table 9 in Section 17.0). The critical factor is that the digestion procedure and analytical reference method used should meet the data quality objectives (DQOs) of the project and match the method used for confirmation analysis. 4.10 Ambient temperature changes can affect the gain of the amplifiers producing instrument drift. Gain or drift is primarily a function of the electronics (amplifier or preamplifier) and not the detector as most instrument detectors are cooled to a constant temperature. Most FPXRF instruments have a built-in automatic gain control. If the automatic gain control is allowed to make periodic adjustments, the instrument will compensate for the influence of temperature changes on its energy scale. If the FPXRF instrument has an automatic gain control function, the operator will not have to adjust the instrument's gain unless an error message appears. If an error message appears, the operatorshould follow the manufacturer's procedures for troubleshooting the problem. Often, this involves performing a new energy calibration. The performance of an energy calibration check to assess drift is a quality control measure discussed in Section 9.2. If the operator is instructed by the manufacturer to manually conduct a gain check because of increasing or decreasing ambient temperature, it is standard to perform a gain check after every 10 to 20 sample measurements or once an hour whichever is more frequent. It is also suggested that a gain check be performed if the temperature fluctuates more than 10 to 20'F. The operator should follow the manufacturer's recommendations for gain check frequency. 4'11=.y<X11100 5.1 Proper training for the safe operation of the instrument and radiation training should be completed by the analyst prior to analysis_ Radiation safety for each specific instrument can be found in the operators manual_ Protective shielding should never be removed by the analyst or any personnel other than the manufacturer. The analyst should be aware of the local state and national regulations that pertain to the use of radiation -producing equipment and radioactive materials with which compliance is required Licenses for radioactive materials are of two types; (1) general license which is usually provided by the manufacturer for receiving, acquiring, owning, possessing, using, and transferring radioactive material incorporated in a device or equipment, and (2) specific license which is issued to named persons for the operation of radioactive instruments as required by local state agencies. There should be a person appointed within the organization that is solely responsible for properly instructing all personnel, maintaining inspection records, and monitoring x-ray equipment at regular intervals. A copy of the radioactive material licenses and leak tests should be present with the instrument at all times and available to local and national authorities upon request. X-ray tubes do not require radioactive material licenses or leak tests, but do require approvals and licenses which vary from state to state. In addition, fail-safe x-ray warning lights should be illuminated whenever an x-ray tube is energized. Provisions listed above concerning radiation safety regulations, shielding, training, and responsible personnel apply to x-ray tubes just as to radioactive sources. In addition, a log of the times and operating conditions should be kept whenever an x-ray tube is energized. Finally, an additional hazard present with x-ray tubes is the danger of electric shock from the high voltage supply. The danger of electric shock is as substantial as the danger from radiation but is often overlooked because of its familiarity. 5.2 Radiation monitoring equipment should be used with the handling of the instrument. The operator and the surrounding environment should be monitored continually for analyst exposure to radiation. Thermal luminescent detectors (TLD) in the form of badges and rings are used to monitor operator radiation exposure. The TLDs should be worn in the area of most frequent exposure. The maximum permissible whole -body dose from occupational exposure is 5 CD-ROM 6200 - 6 Revision 0 January 1998 Roentgen Equivalent Man (REM) per year. Possible exposure pathways for radiation to enter the body are ingestion, inhaling, and absorption. The best precaution to prevent radiation exposure is distance and shielding. 5.3 Refer to Chapter Three for guidance on some proper safety protocols. 6.0 EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES 6.1 FPXRF S ectrometer. An FPXRF spectrometer consists of four major components- (1) a source that provides x-rays; (2) a sample presentation device; (3) a detector that converts x- ray -generated photons emitted from the sample into measurable electronic signals; and (4) a data processing unit that contains an emission or fluorescence energy analyzer, such as an MCA, that processes the signals into an x-ray energy spectrum from which elemental concentrations in the sample may be calculated, and a data display and storage system. These components and additional, optional items, are discussed below. 6.1.1 Excitation Sources: Most FPXRF instruments use sealed radioisotope sources to produce x-rays in order to irradiate samples. The FPXRF instrument may contain between one and three radioisotope sources. Common radioisotope sources used for analysis for metals in soils are iron (Fe)-55, cadmium (Cd)-109, americium (Am)-241, and curium (Cm)-244. These sources may be contained in a probe along with a window and the detector; the probe is connected to a data reduction and handling system by means of a flexible cable. Alternatively, the sources, window, and detector may be included in the same unit as the data reduction and handling system. The relative strength of the radioisotope sources is measured in units of millicuries (mCi). All other components of the FPXRF system being equal, the stronger the source, the greater the sensitivity and precision of a given instrument. Radioisotope sources undergo constant decay. In fact, it is this decay process that emits the primary x-rays used to excite samples for FPXRF analysis. The decay of radioisotopes is measured in "half-lives." The half-life of a radioisotope is defined as the length of time required to reduce the radioisotopes strength or activity by half. Developers of FPXRF technologies recommend source replacement at regular intervals based on the source's half-life. The characteristic x-rays emitted from each of the different sources have energies capable of exciting a certain range of analytes in a sample. Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of four common radioisotope sources. X-ray tubes have higher radiation output, no intrinsic lifetime limit, produce constant output over their lifetime, and do not have the disposal problems of radioactive sources but are just now appearing in FPXRF instruments An electrically -excited x-ray tube operates by bombarding an anode with electrons accelerated by a high voltage. The electrons gain an energy in electron volts equal to the accelerating voltage and can excite atomic transitions in the anode, which then produces characteristic x-rays. These characteristic x-rays are emitted through a window which contains the vacuum required for the electron acceleration. An important difference between x-ray tubes and radioactive sources is that the electrons which bombard the anode also produce a continuum of x-rays across a broad range of energies in addition to the characteristic x-rays. This continuum is weak compared to the characteristic x-rays but can provide substantial excitation since it covers a broad energy range. It has the undesired property of producing background in the spectrum near the analyte x-ray lines when it is scattered by the sample. For this reason a filter is often used between the x-ray tube and the sample to suppress the continuum radiation white passing the characteristic CD-ROM 6200 - 7 Revision 0 January1998 x-rays from the anode. This filter is sometimes incorporated into the window of the x-ray tube. The choice of accelerating voltage is governed by the anode material, since the electrons must have sufficient energy to excite the anode, which requires a voltage greater than the absorption edge of the anode material. The anode is most efficiently excited by voltages 2 to 2.5 times the edge energy (most x-rays per unit power to the tube), although voltages as low as 1.5 times the absorption edge energy will work. The characteristic x-rays emitted by the anode are capable of exciting a range of elements in the samplejust as with a radioactive source. Table 3 gives the recommended operating voltages and the sample elements excited for some common anodes. 6.1.2 Sample Presentation Device: FPXRF instruments can be operated in two modes: in situ and intrusive. If operated in the in situ mode, the probe window is placed in direct contact with the soil surface to be analyzed. When an FPXRF instrument is operated in the intrusive mode, a soil or sediment sample must be collected, prepared, and placed in a sample cup. For most FPXRF in operated in the intrusive mode, the probe is rotated so that the window faces upward. A protective sample cover is placed over the window, and the sample cup is placed on top of the window inside the protective sample cover for analysis. 6.1.3 Detectors: The detectors in the FPXRF instruments can be either solid-state detectors or gas -filled, proportional counter detectors. Common solid-state detectors include mercuric iodide (Hgl2), silicon pin diode and lithium -drifted silicon Si(Li). The Hg12 detector is operated at a moderately subambient temperature controlled by a low power thermoelectric cooler. The silicon pin diode detector also is cooled via the thermoelectric Peltier effect. The Si(Li) detector must be cooled to at least -90 'C either with liquid nitrogen or by thermoelectric cooling via the Peltier effect. Instruments with a Si(Li) detector have an internal liquid nitrogen dewar with a capacity of 0.5 to 1.0 liter. Proportional counter detectors are rugged and lightweight, which are important features of afield portable detector. However, the resolution of a proportional counter detector is not as good as that of a solid-state detector. The energy resolution of a detector for characteristic x-rays is usually expressed in terms of full width at half -maximum (FWHM) height of the manganese Kq peak at 5.89 keV. The typical resolutions of the above mentioned detectors are as follows: Hgl,-270 eV; silicon pin diode-250 eV; Si(Li)-170 eV; and gas -filled, proportional counter-750 eV. During operation of a solid-state detector, an x-ray photon strikes a biased, solid-state crystal and loses energy in the crystal by producing electron -hole pairs. The electric charge produced is collected and provides a current pulse that is directly proportional to the energy of the x-ray photon absorbed by the crystal of the detector. A gas -filled, proportional counter detector is an ionization chamber filled with a mixture of noble and other gases. An x-ray photon entering the chamber ionizes the gas atoms. The electric charge produced is collected and provides an electric signal that is directly proportional to the energy of the x-ray photon absorbed by the gas in the detector. 6.1.4 Data Processing Units: The key component in the data processing unit of an FPXRF instrument is the MCA. The MCA receives pulses from the detector and sorts them by their amptitudes (energy level). The MCA counts pulses per second to determine the height of the peak in a spectrum, which is indicative of the target analyte's concentration. The spectrum of element peaks are built on the MCA. The MCAs in FPXRF instruments have from 256 to 2,048 channels. The concentrations of target analytes are usually shown in parts per million on a liquid crystal display (LCD) in the instrument. FPXRF instruments can store both spectra and from 100 to 500 sets of numerical analytical results. Most FPXRF CD-ROM 6200 - 8 Revision 0 January 1998 instruments are menu -driven from software built into the units or from PCs. Once the data —storage memory of an FPXRF unit is full, data can be downloaded by means of an RS- 232 port and cable to a PC_ 62 Spare battery chargers. 6.3 Polyethylene sample cups: 31 millimeters (mm) to 40 mm in diameter with collar, or equivalent (appropriate for FPXRF instrument)_ 6.4 . X-ray window film: Mylar, KaptonT', Spectrolener", polypropylene, or equivalent; 2.5 to 6.0 micrometers (pm) thick. 6.5 Mortar and pestle: glass, agate, or aluminum oxide; for grinding soil and sediment samples. 6.6 Containers: glass or plastic to store samples. 6.7 Sieves: 60-mesh (0.25 mm), stainless -steel, Nylon, or equivalent for preparing soil and sediment samples. 6.8 Trowels: for smoothing soil surfaces and collecting soil samples. 6.9 Plastic bags: used for collection and homogenization of soil samples. 6.10 Drying oven: standard convection or toaster oven, for soil and sediment samples that require drying. 7.0 REAGENTS AND STANDARDS 7.1 Pure Element Standards: Each pure, single -element standard is intended to produce strong characteristic x-ray peaks of the element of interest only_ Other elements present must not contribute to the fluorescence spectrum. A set of pure element standards for commonly sought analytes is supplied by the instrument manufacturer, if required for the instrument; not all instruments require the pure element standards. The standards are used to set the region of interest (ROI) for each element. They also can be used as energy calibration and resolution check samples. 72 Site -specific Calibration Standards: Instruments that employ fundamental parameters (FP) or similar mathematical models in minimizing matrix effects may not require SSCS. If the FP calibration model is to be optimized or if empirical calibration is necessary, then SSCSs must be collected, prepared, and analyzed. 7.2.1 The SSCS must be representative of the matrix to be analyzed by FPXRF. These samples must be well homogenized. A minimum of ten samples spanning the concentration ranges of the analytes of interest and of the interfering elements must be obtained from the site. A sample size of 4 to 8 ounces is recommended, and standard glass sampling jars should be used_ 7.2.2 Each sample should be oven -dried for 2 to 4 hours at a temperature of less than 150'C. If mercury is to be analyzed, a separate sample portion must remain undried, as heating may volatilize the mercury. When the sample is dry, all large, organic debris and CD-ROM 6200 - 9 Revision 0 January 1998 nonrepresentative material, such as twigs, leaves, roots, insects, asphalt, and rock should be removed. The sample should be ground with a mortar and pestle and passed through a 60- mesh sieve_ Only the coarse rock fraction should remain on the screen_ 7.2.3 The sample should be homogenized by using a riffle splitter or by placing 150 to 200 grams of the dried, sieved sample on a piece of kraft or butcher paper about 1.5 by 1.5 feet in size. Each corner of the paper should be lifted alternately, rolling the soil over on itself and toward the opposite corner. The soil should be rolled on itself 20 times. Approximately 5 grams of the sample should then be removed and placed in a sample cup for FPXRF analysis. The rest of the prepared sample should be sent off site for ICP or AA analysis_ The method use for confirmatory analysis should meet the data quality objectives of the project. 7.3 Blank Samples: The blank samples should be from a "clean" quartz or silicon dioxide matrix that is free of any analytes at concentrations above the method detection limits. These samples are used to monitor for cross -contamination and laboratory -induced contaminants or interferences. 7.4 Standard Reference Materials: Standard reference materials (SRM) are standards containing certified amounts of metals in soil or sediment_ These standards are used for accuracy and performance checks of FPXRF analyses_ SRMs can be obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NEST), the U-S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Canadian National Research Council, and the national bureau of standards in foreign nations. Pertinent MST SRMs for FPXRF analysis include 2704, Buffalo River Sediment; 2709, San Joaquin Soil; and 2710 and 2711, Montana Soil. These SRMs contain soil or sediment from actual sites that has been analyzed using independent inorganic analytical methods by many different laboratories_ 8.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND STORAGE Sample handling and preservation procedures used in FPXRF analyses should follow the guidelines in Chapter Three, Inorganic Analytes. 9.0 QUALITY CONTROL 9.1 Refer to Chapter One for additional guidance on quality assurance protocols. All field data sheets and quality control data should be maintained for reference or inspection. 9.2 Energy Calibration Check: To determine whether an FPXRF instrument is operating within resolution and stability tolerances, an energy calibration check should be run. The energy calibration check determines whether the characteristic x-ray lines are shifting, which would indicate drift within the instrument. As discussed in Section 4.10, this check also serves as a gain check in the event that ambient temperatures are fluctuating greatly (> 10 to 200F). The energy calibration check should be run at a frequency consistent with manufacturers recommendations. Generally, this would be at the beginning of each working day, after the batteries are changed or the instrument is shutoff, at the end of each working day, and at any other time when the instrument operator believes that drift is occurring during analysis. A pure element such as iron, manganese, copper, or lead is often used for the energy calibration check. A manufacturer -recommended count time per source should be used for the check. 9.2.1 The instrument manufacturer's manual specifies the channel or kiloelectron volt level at which a pure element peak should appear and the expected intensity of the peak. CD-ROM 6200 - 10 Revision 0 January1998 The intensity and channel number of the pure element as measured using the radioactive source should be checked and compared to the manufacturer's recommendation. If the energy calibration check does not meet the manufacturer's criteria, then the pure element sample should be repositioned and reanalyzed. If the criteria are still not met, then an energy calibration should be performed as described in the manufacturer's manual. With some FPXRF instruments, once a spectrum is acquired from the energy calibration check, the peak can be optimized and realigned to the manufacturer's specifications using their software. 9.3 Blank Samples: Two types of blank samples should be analyzed for FPXRF analysis:. instrument blanks and method blanks. An instrument blank is used to verify that no contamination exists in the spectrometer or on the probe window. 9.3.1 The instrument blank can be silicon dioxide, a Teflon block, a quartz block, "clean" sand, or lithium carbonate. This instrument blank should be analyzed on each working day before and after analyses are conducted and once per every twenty samples. An instrument blank should also be analyzed whenever contamination is suspected by the analyst. The frequency of analysis will vary with the data quality objectives of the project. A manufacturer -recommended count time per source should be used for the blank analysis. No element concentrations above the method detection limits should be found in the instrument blank. If concentrations exceed these limits, then the probe window and the check sample should be checked for contamination_ If contamination is not a problem, then the instrument must be "zeroed" by following the manufacturer's instructions. 9.3.2 A method blank is used to monitor for laboratory -induced contaminants or interferences_ The method blank can be "clean" silica sand or lithium carbonate that undergoes the same preparation procedure as the samples. A method blank must be analyzed at least daily_ The frequency of analysis will depend on the data quality objectives of the project_ To be acceptable, a method blank must not contain any analyte at a concentration above its method detection limit_ If an analyte's concentration exceeds its method detection limit, the cause of the problem must be identified, and all samples analyzed with the method blank must be reanalyzed. 9.4 Calibration Verification Checks: A calibration verification check sample is used to check the accuracy of the instrument and to assess the stability and consistency of the analysis for the analytes of interest. A check sample should be analyzed at the beginning of each working day, during active sample analyses, and at the end of each working day. The frequency of calibration checks during active analysis will depend on the data quality objectives of the project. The check sample should be a well characterized soil sample from the site that is representative of site samples in terms of particle size and degree of homogeneity and that contains contaminants at concentrations near the action levels. If a site -specific sample is not available, then an NIST or other SRM that contains the analytes of interest can be used to verify the accuracy of the instrument. The measured value for each target analyte should be within ±24 percent (%D) of the true value for the calibration verification check to be acceptable. If a measured value falls outside this range, then the check sample should be reanalyzed. If the value continues to fall outside the acceptance range, the instrument should be recalibrated, and the batch of samples analyzed before the unacceptable calibration verification check must be reanalyzed. 9.5 Precision Measurements: The precision of the method is monitored by analyzing a sample with low, moderate, or high concentrations of target analytes_ The frequency of precision measurements will depend on the data quality objectives for the data. A minimum of one precision sample should be run per day. Each precision sample should be analyzed i times in replicate. It CD-ROM 6200 - 11 Revision 0 January 1998 is recommended that precision measurements be obtained for samples with varying concentration ranges to assess the effect of concentration on method precision_ Determining method precision for analytes at concentrations near the site action levels can be extremely important if the FPXRF results are to be used in an enforcement action; therefore, selection of at least one sample with target analyte concentrations at or near the site action levels or levels of concern is recommended. A precision sample is analyzed by the instrument for the same field analysis time as used for other project samples. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the sample mean is used to assess method precision. For FPXRF data to be considered adequately precise, the RSD should not be greater than 20 percent with the exception of chromium. RSD values for chromium should not be greater than 30 percent. The equation for calculating RSD is as follows: RSD = (SD/Mean Concentration) x 100 where: RSD - Relative standard deviation for the precision measurement for the analyte SD = Standard deviation of the concentration for the analyte Mean Concentration = Mean concentration for the analyte The precision or reproducibility of a measurement will improve with increasing count time, however, increasing the count time by a factor of 4 will provide only 2 times better precision, so there is a point of diminishing return. Increasing the count time also improves the detection limit, but decreases sample throughput_ 9.6 Detection Limits: Results for replicate analyses of a low -concentration sample, SSCS, or SRM can be used to generate an average site -specific method detection and quantitation limits. In this case, the method detection limit is defined as 3 times the standard deviation of the results for the low -concentration samples and the method quantitation limit is defined as 10 times the standard deviation of the same results. Another means of determining method detection and quantitation limits involves use of counting statistics. In FPXRF analysis, the standard deviation from counting statistics is defined as SD = (N)�, where SD is the standard deviation for a target analyte peak and N is the net counts for the peak of the analyte of interest (i.e., gross counts minus background under the peak). Three times this standard deviation would be the method detection limit and 10 times this standard deviation would be the method quantitation limit. If both of the above mentioned approaches are used to calculate method detection limits, the larger of the standard deviations should be used to provide the more conservative detection limits. This SD based detection limit criteria must be used by the operator to evaluate each measurement for its useability_ A measurement above the average calculated or manufacturer's detection limit, but smaller than three times its associated SD, should not be used as a quantitative measurement. Conversely, if the measurement is below the average calculated or manufacturer's detection limit, but greater than three times its associated SD. It should be coded as an estimated value. 9.7 Confirmatory Samples: The comparability of the FPXRF analysis is determined by submitting FPXRF-analyzed samples for analysis at a laboratory. The method of confirmatory analysis must meet the project and XRF measurement data quality objectives. The confirmatory samples must be splits of the well homogenized sample material_ In some cases the prepared CD-ROM 6200 - 12 Revision 0 January 1998 sample cups can be submitted. A minimum of 1 sample for each 20 FPXRF-analyzed samples should be submitted for confirmatory analysis. This frequency will depend on data quality objectives. The confirmatory analyses can also be used to verify the quality of the FPXRF data. The confirmatory samples should be selected from the lower, middle, and upper range of concentrations measured by the FPXRF. They should also include samples with analyte concentrations at or near the site action levels. The results of the confirmatory analysis and FPXRF analyses should be evaluated with a least squares linear regression analysis_ If the measured concentrations span more than one order of magnitude, the data should be log -transformed to standardize variance which is proportional to the magnitude of measurement. The correlation coefficient (r2) for the results should be 0.7 or greater for the FPXRF data to be considered screening level data. If the rZ is 0.9 or greater and inferential statistics indicate the FPXRF data and the confirmatory data are statistically equivalent at a 99 percent confidence level, the data could potentially meet definitive level data criteria. 10.0 CALIBRATION AND STANDARDIZATION 10.1 Instrument Calibration: Instrument calibration procedures vary among FPXRF instruments. Users of this method should follow the calibration procedures outlined in the operator's manual for each specific FPXRF instrument. Generally, however, three types of calibration procedures exist for FPXRF instruments: FP calibration, empirical calibration, and the Compton peak ratio or normalization method. These three types of calibration are discussed below. 10.2 Fundamental Parameters Calibration: FP calibration procedures are extremely variable. An FP calibration provides the analyst with a "standardless" calibration. The advantages of FP calibrations over empirical calibrations include the following: No previously collected site -specific samples are required, although site -specific samples with confirmed and validated analytical results for all elements present could be used. Cost is reduced because fewer confirmatory laboratory results or calibration standards are required_ However, the analyst should be aware of the limitations imposed on FP calibration by particle size and matrix effects. These limitations can be minimized by adhering to the preparation procedure described in Section 7.2. The two FP calibration processes discussed below are based on an effective energy FP routine and a back scatter with FP (BFP) routine. Each FPXRF FP calibration process is based on a different iterative algorithmic method. The calibration procedure for each routine is explained in detail in the manufacturer's user manual for each FPXRF instrument; in addition, training courses are offered for each instrument. 10.2.1 Effective Energy FP Calibration: The effective energy FP calibration is performed by the manufacturer before an instrument is sent to the analyst. Although SSCS can be used, the calibration relies on pure element standards or SRMs such as those obtained from NIST for the FP calibration. The effective energy routine relies on the spectrometer response to pure elements and FP iterative algorithms to compensate for various matrix effects_ Alpha coefficients are calculated using a variation of the Sherman equation, which calculates theoretical intensities from the measurement of pure element samples. These coefficients indicate the quantitative effect of each matrix element on an analyte's measured CD-ROM 6200 - 13 Revision 0 January 1998 x-ray intensity. Next, the Lachance Trail[ algorithm is solved as a set of simultaneous equations based on the theoretical intensities. The alpha coefficients are then downloaded into the specific instrument. The working effective energy FP calibration curve must be verified before sample analysis begins on each working day, after every 20 samples are analyzed, and at the end of sampling. This verification is performed by analyzing either an NIST SRM Oran SSCS that is representative of the site -specific samples. This SRM or SSCS serves as a calibration check. A manufacturer -recommended count time per source should be used for the calibration check. The analyst must then adjust the y-intercept and slope of the calibration curve to best fit the known concentrations of target analytes in the SRM or SSCS. A percent difference (%D) is then calculated for each target analyte. The %D should be within ±20 percent of the certified value for each analyte. If the %D falls outside this acceptance range, then the calibration curve should be adjusted by varying the slope of the line or the y-intercept value for the analyte. The SRM or SSCS is reanalyzed until the %D falls within ±20 percent. The group of 20 samples analyzed before an out -of -control calibration check should be reanalyzed. The equation to calibrate %D is as follows: %D = ((CS - Ck)1 C') x 100 where: %D = Percent difference Ck = Certified concentration of standard sample CS = Measured concentration of standard sample 10.2.2 BFP Calibration: BFP calibration relies on the ability of the liquid nitrogen - cooled, Si(Li) solid-state detector to separate the coherent (Compton) and incoherent (Rayleigh) backscatter peaks of primary radiation. These peak intensities are known to be a function of sample composition, and the ratio of the Compton to Rayleigh peak is a function of the mass absorption of the sample. The calibration procedure is explained in detail in the instrument manufacturer's manual. Following is a general description of the BFP calibration procedure_ The concentrations of all detected and quantified elements are entered into the computer software system. Certified element results for an NIST SRM or confirmed and validated results for an SSCS can be used. In addition, the concentrations of oxygen and silicon must be entered; these two concentrations are not found in standard metals analyses. The manufacturer provides silicon and oxygen concentrations for typical soil types. Pure element standards are then analyzed using a manufacturer -recommended count time per source. The results are used to calculate correction factors in order to adjust for spectrum overlap of elements. The working BFP calibration curve must be verified before sample analysis begins on each working day, after every 20 samples are analyzed, and at the end of the analysis. This verification is performed by analyzing either an NIST SRM or an SSCS that is representative of the site -specific samples. This SRM or SSCS serves as a calibration check. The standard sample is analyzed using a manufacturer -recommended count time per source to check the CD-ROM 6200 - 14 Revision 0 January 1998 calibration curve. The analyst must then adjust the y-intercept and slope of the calibration curve to best fit the known concentrations of target analytes in the SRM or SSCS. A %D is then calculated for each target analyte. The %D should fall within ±20 percent of the certified value for each analyte. If the %D falls outside this acceptance range, then the calibration curve should be adjusted by varying the slope of the line the y-intercept value for the analyte_ The standard sample is reanalyzed until the %D falls within ±20 percent_ The group of 20 samples analyzed before an out -of -control calibration check should be reanalyzed. 10.3 Empirical Calibration: An empirical calibration can be performed with SSCS, site - typical standards, or standards prepared from metal oxides. A discussion of SSCS is included in Section 7.2; if no previously characterized samples exist for a specific site, site -typical standards can be used_ Site -typical standards may be selected from commercially available characterized soils or from SSCS prepared for another site. The site -typical standards should closely approximate the site's soil matrix with respect to particle size distribution, mineralogy, and contaminant analytes. If neither SSCS nor site -typical standards are available, it is possible to make gravimetric standards by adding metal oxides to a "clean" sand or silicon dioxide matrix that simulates soil. Metal oxides can be purchased from various chemical vendors. If standards are made on site, a balance capable of weighing items to at least two decimal places is required. Concentrated ICP or AA standard solutions can also be used to make standards. These solutions are available in concentrations of 10,000 parts per million, thus only small volumes have to be added to the soil. An empirical calibration using SSCS involves analysis of SSCS by the FPXRF instrument and by a conventional analytical method such as ICP or AA. A total acid digestion procedure should be used by the laboratory for sample preparation. Generally, a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 30 well characterized SSCS, site -typical standards, or prepared metal oxide standards are required to perform an adequate empirical calibration. The number of required standards depends on the number of analytes of interest and interfering elements_ Theoretically, an empirical calibration with SSCS should provide the most accurate data for a site because the calibration compensates for site -specific matrix effects. The first step in an empirical calibration is to analyze the pure element standards for the elements of interest. This enables the instrument to set channel limits for each element for spectral deconvolution. Next the SSCS, site -typical standards, or prepared metal oxide standards are analyzed using a count time of 200 seconds per source or a count time recommended by the manufacturer. This will produce a spectrum and net intensity of each analyte in each standard. The analyte concentrations for each standard are then entered into the instrument software; these concentrations are those obtained from the laboratory, the certified results, or the gravimetrically determined concentrations of the prepared standards. This gives the instrument analyte values to regress against corresponding intensities during the modeling stage. The regression equation correlates the concentrations of an analyte with its net intensity. The calibration equation is developed using a least squares fit regression analysis. After the regression terms to be used in the equation are defined, a mathematical equation can be developed to calculate the analyte concentration in an unknown sample. In some FPXRF instruments, the software of the instrument calculates the regression equation. The software uses calculated intercept and slope values to form a multiterm equation. In conjunction with the software in the instrument, the operator can adjust the multiterm equation to minimize interelement interferences and optimize the intensity calibration curve. CD-ROM 6200 - 15 Revision 0 January1995 It is possible to define up to six linear or nonlinear terms in the regression equation. Terms can be added and deleted to optimize the equation. The goal is to produce an equation with the smallest regression error and the highest correlation coefficient. These values are automatically computed by the software as the regression terms are added, deleted, or modified. It is also possible to delete data points from the regression line if these points are significant outliers or if they are heavily weighing the data. Once the regression equation has been selected for an analyte, the equation can be entered into the software for quantitation of analytes in subsequent samples. For an empirical calibration to be acceptable, the regression equation for a specific analyte should have a correlation coefficient of 0.98 or greater or meet the DQOs of the project. In an empirical calibration, one must apply the DQOs of the project and ascertain critical or action levels for the analytes of interest. It is within these concentration ranges or around these action levels that the FPXRF instrument should be calibrated most accurately. It may not be possible to develop a good regression equation over several orders of analyte concentration. 10.4 Compton Normalization Method: The Compton normalization method is based on analysis of a single, certified standard and normalization forthe Compton peak_ The Compton peak is produced from incoherent backscattering of x-ray radiation from the excitation source and is present in the spectrum of every sample. The Compton peak intensity changes with differing matrices. Generally, matrices dominated by lighter elements produce a larger Compton peak, and those dominated by heavier elements produce a smaller Compton peak. Normalizing to the Compton peak can reduce problems with varying matrix effects among samples. Compton normalization is similar to the use of internal standards in organics analysis. The Compton normalization method may not be effective when analyte concentrations exceed a few percent. The certified standard used for this type of calibration could be an MIST SRM such as 2710 or 2711. The SRM must be a matrix similar to the samples and must contain the analytes of interests at concentrations near those expected in the samples. First, a response factor has to be determined for each analyte. This factor is calculated by dividing the net peak intensity by the analyte concentration. The net peak intensity is gross intensity corrected for baseline interference. Concentrations of analytes in samples are then determined by multiplying the baseline corrected analyte signal intensity by the normalization factor and by the response factor_ The normalization factor is the quotient of the baseline corrected Compton Ka peak intensity of the SRM divided by that of the samples. Depending on the FPXRF instrument used, these calculations may be done manually or by the instrument software. 11.0 PROCEDURE 11.1 Operation of the various FPXRF instruments will vary according to the manufacturers' protocols. Before operating any FPXRF instrument, one should consult the manufacturer's manual. Most manufacturers recommend that their instruments be allowed to warm up for 15 to 30 minutes before analysis of samples. This will help alleviate drift or energy calibration problems later on in analysis. 11.2 Each FPXRF instrument should be operated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. There are two modes in which FPXRF instruments can be operated: in situ and intrusive. The in situ mode involves analysis of an undisturbed soil sediment or sample. Intrusive analysis involves collection and preparation of a soil or sediment sample before analysis. Some FPXRF instruments can operate in both modes of analysis, while others are designed to operate in only one mode. The two modes of analysis are discussed below. CD-ROM 1?200 - 16 Revision 0 January 1998 11.3 For in situ analysis, one requirement is that any large or nonrepresentative debris be removed from the soil surface before analysis_ This debris includes rocks, pebbles, leaves, vegetation, roots, and concrete. Another requirement is that the soil surface be as smooth as possible so that the probe window will have good contact with the surface. This may require some leveling of the surface with a stainless -steel trowel. During the study conducted to provide data for this method, this modest amount of sample preparation was found to take less than 5 minutes per sample location. The last requirement is that the soil or sediment not be saturated with water. Manufacturers state that their FPXRF instruments will perform adequately for soils with moisture contents of 5 to 20 percent but will not perform well for saturated soils, especially if ponded water exists on the surface. Another recommended technique for in situ analysis is to tamp the soil to increase soil density and compactness for better repeatability and representativeness. This condition is especially important for heavy element analysis, such as barium. Source count times for in situ analysis usually range from 30 to 120 seconds, but source count times will vary among instruments and depending on required detection limits. 11.4 For intrusive analysis of surface or sediment, it is recommended that a sample be collected from a 4- by 4-inch square that is 1 inch deep. This will produce a soil sample of approximately 375 grams or 250 cm3, which is enough soil to fill an 8-ounce jar. The sample should be homogenized, dried, and ground before analysis. The sample can be homogenized before or after drying. The homogenization technique to be used after drying is discussed in Section 42_ If the sample is homogenized before drying, it should be thoroughly mixed in a beaker or similar container, or if the sample is moist and has a high clay content, it can be kneaded in a plastic bag. One way to monitor homogenization when the sample is kneaded in a plastic bag is to add sodium fluorescein dye to the sample. After the moist sample has been homogenized, it is examined under an ultraviolet light to assess the distribution of sodium fluorescein throughout the sample_ If the fluorescent dye is evenly distributed in the sample, homogenization is considered complete; if the dye is not evenly distributed, mixing should continue until the sample has been thoroughly homogenized. During the study conducted to provide data for this method, the homogenization procedure using the fluorescein dye required 3 to 5 minutes per sample. As demonstrated in Sections 13.5 and 13.7, homogenization has the greatest impact on the reduction of sampling variability. It produces little or no contamination. Often, it can be used without the more labor intensive steps of drying, grinding, and sieving given in Sections 11.5 and 11.6. Of course, to achieve the best data quality possible all four steps must be followed. 11.5 Once the soil or sediment sample has been homogenized, it should be dried. This can be accomplished with a toaster oven or convection oven. A small aliquot of the sample (20 to 50 grams) is placed in a suitable container for drying. The sample should be dried for 2 to 4 hours in the convection or toaster oven at a temperature not greater than 150°C. Microwave drying is not a recommended procedure. Field studies have shown that microwave drying can increase variability between the FPXRF data and confirmatory analysis_ High levels of metals in a sample can cause arcing in the microwave oven, and sometimes slag forms in the sample. Microwave oven drying can also melt plastic containers used to hold the sample. 11.6 The homogenized dried sample material should be ground with a mortar and pestle and passed through a 60-mesh sieve to achieve a uniform particle size. Sample grinding should continue until at least 90 percent of the original sample passes through the sieve. The grinding step normally takes an average of 10 minutes per sample. An aliquot of the sieved sample should then be placed in a 31.0-mm polyethylene sample cup (or equivalent) for analysis. The sample cup should be one-half to three-quarters full at a minimum. The sample cup should be covered with a 2.5 pm Mylar (or equivalent) film for analysis_ The rest of the soil sample should be placed in a jar, labeled, and archived forpossible confirmation analysis. All equipment including the mortar, pestle, CD-ROM 6200 - 17 Revision 0 January 1998 and sieves must be thoroughly cleaned so that any crass -contamination is below the MDLs of the procedure or DQOs of the analysis. 12.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND CALCULATIONS Most FPXRF instruments have software capable of storing all analytical results and spectra. The results are displayed in parts per million and can be downloaded to a PC, which can provide a hard copy printout. Individual measurements that are smaller than three times their associated SD should not be used for quantitation. 13.0 METHOD PERFORMANCE 13.1 This section discusses four performance factors, field -based method detection limits, precision, accuracy, and comparability to EPA -approved methods. The numbers presented in Tables 4 through 9 were generated from data obtained from six FPXRF instruments. The soil samples analyzed by the six FPXRF instruments were collected from two sites in the United States. The soil samples contained several of the target analytes at concentrations ranging from nondetect to tens of thousands of mg/kg. 132 The six FPXRF instruments included the TN 9000 and TN Lead Analyzer manufactured by TN Spectrace; the X-MET 920 with a SiLi detector and X-MET 920 with a gas - filled proportional detector manufactured by Metorex, Inc.; the XL Spectrum Analyzer manufactured by Niton; and the MAP Spectrum Analyzer manufactured by Scitec. The TN 9000 and TN Lead Analyzer both have a Hglz detector. The TN 9000 utilized an Fe-55, Cd-109, and Am-241 source. The TN Lead Analyzer had only a Cd-109 source. The X-Met 920 with the SiLi detector had a Cd- 109 and Am-241 source. The X-MET 920 with the gas -filled proportional detector had only a Cd- 109 source. The XL Spectrum Analyzer utilized a silicon pin -diode detector and a Cd-109 source. The MAP Spectrum Analyzer utilized a solid-state silicon detector and a Cd-109 source_ 13.3 All data presented in Tables 4 through 9 were generated using the following calibrations and source count times_ The TN 9000 and TN Lead Analyzer were calibrated using fundamental parameters using NIST SRM 2710 as a calibration check sample. The TN 9000 was operated using 100, 60, and 60 second count times for the Cd-109, Fe-55, and Am-241 sources, respectively. The TN Lead analyzer was operated using a 60 second count time for the Cd-109 source. The X-MET 920 with the Si(Li) detector was calibrated using fundamental parameters and one well characterized site -specific soil standard as a calibration check. It used 140 and 100 second count times for the Cd-109 and Am-241 sources, respectively. The X-MET 920 with the gas -filled proportional detector was calibrated empirically using between 10 and 20 well characterized site -specific soil standards. It used 120 second times for the Cd-109 source. The XL Spectrum Analyzer utilized N IST SRM 2710 for calibration and the Compton peak normalization procedure for quantitation based on 60 second count times for the Cd-109 source. The MAP Spectrum Analyzer was internally calibrated by the manufacturer. The calibration was checked using a well -characterized site -specific soil standard. It used 240 second times for the Cd-109 source. 13.4 Field -Based Method Detection Limits: The field -based method detection limits are presented in Table 4. The field -based method detection limits were determined by collecting ten replicate measurements on site -specific soil samples with metals concentrations 2 to 5 times the expected method detection limits. Based on these ten replicate measurements, a standard deviation on the replicate analysis was calculated. The method detection limits presented in Table 4 are defined as 3 times the standard deviation for each analyte. CD --ROM 6200 - 18 Revision 0 January 1998 The field -based method detection limits were generated by using the count times discussed earlier in this section. Ail the field -based method detection limits were calculated for soil samples that had been dried and ground and placed in a sample cup with the exception of the MAP Spectrum Analyzer. This instrument can only be operated in the in situ mode,, meaning the samples were moist and not ground. Some of the analytes such as cadmium, mercury, silver, selenium, and thorium were not detected or only detected at very low concentrations such that a field -based method detection limit could not be determined. These analytes are not presented in Table 4. Other analytes such as calcium, iron, potassium, and titanium were only found at high concentrations (thousands of mg/kg) so that reasonable method detection limits could not be calculated. These analytes also are not presented in Table 4. 115 Precision Measurements: The precision data is presented in Table 5. Each of the six FPXRF instruments performed 10 replicate measurements on 12 soil samples that had analyte concentrations ranging from nondetects to thousands of mg/kg. Each of the 12 soil samples underwent 4 different preparation techniques from in situ (no preparation) to dried and ground in a sample cup. Therefore, there were 48 precision data points for five of the instruments and 24 precision points for the MAP Spectrum Analyzer. The replicate measurements were taken using the source count times discussed at the beginning of this section. For each detectable analyte in each precision sample a mean concentration, standard deviation, and RSD was calculated for each analyte. The data presented in Table 5 is an average RSD for the precision samples that had analyte concentrations at 5 to 10 times the MDL for that analyte for each instrument. Some analytes such as mercury, selenium, silver, and thorium were not detected in any of the precision samples so these analytes are not listed in Table 5. Some analytes such as cadmium, nickel, and tin were only defected at concentrations near the MDLs so that an RSD value calculated at 5 to 10 times the MDL was not possible. One FPXRF instrument collected replicate measurements on an additional nine soil samples to provide a better assessment of the effect of sample preparation on precision. Table 6 shows these results. The additional nine soil samples were comprised of three from each texture and had analyte concentrations ranging from near the detection limit of the FPXRF analyzer to thousands of mg/kg. The FPXRF analyzer only collected replicate measurements from three of the preparation methods; no measurements were collected from the in situ homogenized samples. The FPXRF analyzer conducted five replicate measurements of the in situ field samples by faking measurements at five different points within the 4-inch by 4-inch sample square. Ten replicate measurements were collected for both the intrusive undried and unground and intrusive dried and ground samples contained in cups. The cups were shaken between each replicate measurement. Table 6 shows that the precision dramatically improved from the in situ to the intrusive measurements. In general there was a slight improvement in precision when the sample was dried and ground. Two factors caused the precision for the in situ measurements to be poorer. The major factor is soil heterogeneity. By moving the probe within the 4-inch by 4-inch square, measurements of different soil samples were actually taking place within the square. Table 6 illustrates the dominant effect of soil heterogeneity. It overwhelmed instrument precision when the FPXRF analyzer was used in this mode. The second factor that caused the RSD values to be higher for the in situ measurements is the fact that only five versus ten replicates were taken. A lesser number of measurements caused the standard deviation to be larger which in turn elevated the RSD values. CD-ROM 6200 - 19 Revision 0 January 1998 13.6 Accuracy Measurements: Five of the FPXRF instruments (not including the MAP Spectrum Analyzer) analyzed 18 SRMs using the source count times and calibration methods given at the beginning of this section. The 18 SRMs included 9 soil SRMs, 4 stream or river sediment SRMs, 2 sludge SRMs, and 3 ash SRMs. Each of the SRMs contained known concentrations of certain target analytes. A percent recovery was calculated for each analyte in each SRM for each FPXRF instrument. Table 7 presents a summary of this data. With the exception of cadmium, chromium, and nickel, the values presented in Table 7 were generated from the 13 soil and sediment SRMs only. The 2 sludge and 3 ash SRMs were included for cadmium, chromium, and nickel because of the low or nondetectable concentrations of these three analytes in the soil and sediment SRMs. Only 12 analytes are presented in Table 7. These are the analytes that are of environmental concern and provided a significant number of detections in the SRMs for an accuracy assessment. No data is presented for the X-MET 920 with the gas -filled proportional detector. This FPXRF instrument was calibrated empirically using site -specific soil samples. The percent recovery values from this instrument were very sporadic and the data did not lend itself to presentation in Table 7. Table 8 provides a more detailed summary of accuracy data for one FPXRF instrument (TN 9000) for the 9 soil SRMs and 4 sediment SRMs_ Table 8 shows the certified value, measured value, and percent recovery for five analytes. These analytes were chosen because they are of environmental concern and were most prevalently certified for in the SRM and detected by the FPXRF instrument. The first nine SRMs are soil and the last 4 SRMs are sediment. Percent recoveries for the four NIST SRMs were often between 90 and 110 percent for all analytes. 13.7 Comparability: Comparability refers to the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another_ In this case, FPXRF data generated from a large study of six FPXRF instruments was compared to SW 846 Methods 3050 and 6010 which are the standard soil extraction for metals and analysis by inductively coupled plasma. An evaluation of comparability was conducted by using linear regression analysis. Three factors were determined using the linear regression. These factors were the y-intercept, the slope of the line, and the coefficient of determination (r). As part of the comparability assessment, the effects of soil type and preparation methods were studied. Three soil types (textures) and four preparation methods were examined during the study. The preparation methods evaluated the cumulative effect of particle size, moisture, and homogenization on comparability. Due to the large volume of data produced during this study, linear regression data for six analytes from only one FPXRF instrument is presented in Table 9. Similar trends in the data were seen for all instruments. Table 9 shows the regression parameters for the whole data set, broken out by soil type, and by preparation method. The soil types are as follows: soil 1--sand; soil 2--loam; and soil 3—silty clay. The preparation methods are as follows: preparation 1--in situ in the field; preparation 2--in situ, sample collected and homogenized; preparation 3--intrusive, with sample in a sample cup but sample still wet and not ground; and preparation 4--sample dried, ground, passed through a 40- mesh sieve, and placed in sample cup_ For arsenic, copper, lead, and zinc, the comparability to the confirmatory laboratory was excellent with rZ values ranging from 0.80 to 0.99 for all six FPXRF instruments. The slopes of the regression lines for arsenic, copper, lead, and zinc, were generally between 0.90 and 1.00 indicating the data would need to be corrected very little or not at all to match the confirmatory laboratory data. The e values and slopes of the regression lines for barium and chromium were CD-ROM 6200 - 20 Revision 0 January 1998 not as good as for the other for analytes, indicating the data would have to be corrected to match the confirmatory laboratory - Table 9 demonstrates that there was -little effect of soil type on the regression parameters for any of the six analytes. The only exceptions were for barium in soil 1 and copper in soil 3. In both of these cases, however, it is actually a concentration effect and not a soil effect causing the poorer comparability. All barium and copper concentrations in soil 1 and 3, respectively, were less than 350 mg/kg- Table 9 shows there was a. preparation effect on the regression parameters for all six analytes- With the exception of chromium, the regression parameters were primarily improved going from preparation 1 to preparation 2. In this step, the sample was removed from the soil surface, all large debris was removed, and the sample was thoroughly homogenized. The additional two preparation methods did little to improve the regression parameters. This data indicates that homogenization is the most critical factor when comparing the results. It is essential that the sample sent to the confirmatory laboratory match the FPXRF sample as closely as possible. Section 11.0 of this method discusses the time necessary for each of the sample preparation techniques- Based on the data quality objectives for the project, an analyst must decide if it is worth the extra time required to dry and grind the sample for small improvements in comparability. Homogenization requires 3 to 5 minutes. Drying the sample requires one to two hours. Grinding and sieving requires another 10 to 15 minutes per sample. Lastly, when grinding and sieving is conducted, time must be allotted to decontaminate the mortars, pestles, and sieves. Drying and grinding the samples and decontamination procedures will often dictate that an extra person be on site so that the analyst can keep up with the sample collection crew. The cost of requiring an extra person on site to prepare samples must be balanced with the gain in data quality and sample throughput. 13.8 The following documents may provide additional guidance and insight on this method and technique: 13.8.1 Hewitt, A.D. 1994. "Screening for Metals by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry/Response Factor/Compton Ka Peak Normalization Analysis." American Environmental Laboratory. Pages 24-32. 13.8.2 Piorek, S., and J.R. Pasmore. 1993- "Standardless, In Situ Analysis of Metallic Contaminants in the Natural Environment With a PC -Based, High Resolution Portable X-Ray Analyzer." Third International Symposium on Field Screening Methods for Hazardous Waste and Toxic Chemicals. Las Vegas, Nevada. February 24-26, 1993. Volume 2, Pages 1135-1151. 14.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION 14-1 Pollution prevention encompasses any technique that reduces or eliminates the quantity and/or toxicity of waste at the point of generation. Numerous opportunities for pollution prevention exist in laboratory operation. The EPA has established a preferred hierarchy of environmental management techniques that places pollution prevention as the management option of firstchoice. Whenever feasible, laboratory personnel should use pollution prevention techniques to address their waste generation. When wastes cannot be feasibly reduced at the source, the Agency recommends recycling as the next best option. CD-ROM 6200 - 21 Revision 0 January 1998 14.2 For information about pollution prevention that may be applicable to laboratories and research institutions consult Less is Better.- Laboratory Chemical management for Waste Reduction available from the American Chemical Society's Department of Government Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16th Street N.W_, Washington D.C. 20036, (202) 872-4477_ 15.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT The Environmental Protection Agency requires that laboratory waste management practices be conducted consistent with all applicable rules and regulations. The Agency urges laboratories to protect the air, water, and land by minimizing and controlling all releases from hoods and bench operations, complying with the letter and spirit of any sewer discharge permits and regulations, and by complying with all solid and hazardous waste regulations, particularly the hazardous waste identification rules and land disposal restrictions. For further information on waste management, consult The Waste Management Manual for Laboratory Personnel available from the American Chemical Society at the address listed in Sec. 14.2. 16.0 REFERENCES Metorex. X-MET 920 User's Manual. 2. Spectrace Instruments. 1994_ Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry: An Introduction. 3. TN Spectrace. Spectrace 9000 Field Portable/Benchtop XRF Training and Applications Manual. 4, Unpublished SITE data, recieved from PRO Environment Management, Inc. 17.0 TABLES, DIAGRAMS, FLOWCHARTS, AND VALIDATION DATA The pages to follow contain Tables 1 through 9 and a method procedure flow diagram. CD-ROM 6200 - 22 Revision 0 January 1998 TABLE 1 INTERFERENCE FREE DETECTION LIMITS Analyte Chemical Abstract Series Number Detection Limit in Quartz Sand (milligrams per kilogram) Antimony (Sb) 7440-36-0 40 Arsenic (As) 7440-38-0 40 Barium (Ba) 7440-39-3 20 Cadmium (Cd) 7440A3-9 100 Calcium (Ca) 7440--70-2 70 Chromium (Cr) 7440-47-3 150 Cobalt (Co) 7440-48-4 60 Copper (Cu) 7440-50-8 50 Iron (Fe) 7439-89-6 60 Lead (Pb) 7439-92-1 20 Manganese (Mn) 7439-96-5 70 Mercury (Hg) 7439-97-6 30 Molybdenum (Mo) 7439-93-7 10 Nickel (Ni) 7440-02-0 50 Potassium (K) 7440-09-7 200 Rubidium (Rb) 7440-17-7 10 Selenium (Se) 7782-49-2 40 Silver (Ag) 7440-22-4 70 Strontium (Sr) 7440-24-6 10 Thallium (TI) 7440-28-0 20 Thorium (Th) 7440-29-1 10 Tin (Sn) 7440-31-5 60 Titanium (Ti) 7440-32-6 50 Vanadium (V) 7440-62-2 50 Zinc (Zn) 7440-66-6 50 Zirconium (Zr) 7440-67-7 10 Source: References 1, 2, and 3 CD-ROM 6200 - 23 Revision 0 January 1998 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RADIOISOTOPE SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS Source Activity Half -Life Excitation Energy Elemental Analysis Range (mci) (Years) (keV) Fe-55 20-50 2.7 5.9 Sulfur to Chromium K Lines Mol bdenum to Barium L Lines Cd-109 5-30 1.3 22.1 and 87.9 Calcium to Rhodium K Lines Tantalum to Lead K Lines Barium to Uranium L Lines Am-241 5-30 458 26.4 and 59.6 Copper to Thulium K Lines Tungsten to Uranium L Lines Cm-244 60-100 17.8 14.2 Titanium to Selenium K Lines Lanthanum to Lead L Lines Source: Reference 1, 2, and 3 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF X-RAY TUBE SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS Anode Recommended K-alpha Elemental Analysis Range Material Voltage Range Emission kV (keV Cu 18-22 8.04 Potassium to Cobalt K Lines Silver to Gadolinium L Lines Mo 40-50 17A Cobalt to Yttrium K Lines Europium to Radon L Lines Ag 50-65 22.1 Zinc to Technicium K Lines Ytterbium to Neptunium L Lines Source: Reference 4 Notes: The sample elements excited are chosen by taking as the lower limit the same ratio of excitation line energy to element absorption edge as in Table 2 (approximately 0.45) and the requirement that the excitation line energy be above the element absorption edge as the upper limit (L2 edges used for L lines). K-beta excitation lines were ignored. CD-ROM 6200 - 24 Revision 0 January 1998 TABLE 4 FIELD -BASED METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (mgfkg)a Instrument Analyte TN 9000 TN Lead Analyzer X-MET 920 (SiLi Detector) X-MET 920 (Gas -Filled Detector) XL Spectrum Analyzer MAP Spectrum Anal zer Antimony 55 NR NR NR NR NR Arsenic 60 50 55 50 110 225 Barium 60 NR 30 400 NR NR Chromium 200 460 210 110 900 NR Cobalt 330 NR NR NR NR NR Copper 85 115 75 100 125 525 Lead 45 40 45 100 75 165 Manganese 240 340 NR NR NR NR Molybdenum 25 NR NR NR 30 NR Nickel 100 NR NA NA NA NR Rubidium 30 NR NR NR 45 NR Strontium 35 NR NR NR 40 NR Tin 85 NR NR NR NR NR Zinc 80 95 70 NA 110 NA Zirconium 40 NR NR NR 25 NR Source: Reference 4 a MDLs are related to the total number of counts taken. See Section 13.3 for count times used to generate this table. NR Not reported_ NA Not applicable; analyte was reported but was not at high enough concentrations for method detection limit to be determined. CD-ROM 6200 - 25 Revision 0 January 1998 TABLE 5 PRECISION Analyte Average Relative Standard Deviation for Each Instrument at 5 to 10 Times the MDL TN 9000 TN Lead Analyzer X-MET 920 (SiLi Detector) X-MET 920 (Gas -Filled Detector) XL Spectrum Analyzer MAP Spectrum Analyzer Antimony 6.54 NR NR NR NR NR Arsenic 5.33 4.11 3.23 1.91 12.47 6.68 Barium 4.02 NR 3.31 5.91 NR NR Cadmium 29.84a NR 24.804 NR NR NR Calcium 2.16 NR NR NR NR NR Chromium 22.25 25.78 22.72 3.91 30.25 NR Cobalt 33.90 NR NR NR NR NR Copper 7.03 9.11 8.49 9.12 12.77 14.86 Iron 1.78 1.67 1.55 NR 2.30 NR Lead 6.45 5.93 5.05 7.56 6.97 12.16 Manganese 27.04 24.75 NR NR NR NR Molybdenum 6.95 NR NR NR 12.60 NR Nickel 30.85a NR 24.92a 20.92a NA NR Potassium 3.90 NR NR NR NR NR Rubidium 13.06 NR NR NR 32.69a NR Strontium 4.28 NR NR NR 8.86 NR Tin 24.324 NR NR NR NR NR Titanium 4.87 NR NR NR NR NR Zinc 7.27 7.48 4.26 2.28 10.95 0.83 Zirconium 3.58 NR NR NR 6.49 NR Source. Reference 4 a These values are biased high because the concentration of these analytes in the soil samples was near the detection limit for that particular FPXRF instrument. NR Not reported. NA Not applicable; analyte was reported but was below the method detection limit. CD-ROM 6200 - 26 Revision 0 January1998 TABLE 6 PRECISION AS AFFECTED BY SAMPLE PREPARATION Analyte Average Relative Standard Deviation for Each Preparation Method in Situ -Field Intrusive- Undried and Unground Intrusive - Dried and Ground Antimony 30.1 15.0 14.4 Arsenic 22.5 5.36 3.76 Barium 17.3 3.38 2.90 Cadmium' 41.2 30.8 28.3 Calcium 17.5 1.68 1.24 Chromium 17.6 28.5 21.9 Cobalt 28.4 31.1 28.4 Copper 26.4 %2 7.90 Iron 10.3 1.67 1.57 Lead 25.1 8.55 6.03 Manganese 40.5 12.3 13.0 Mercury ND ND ND Molybdenum 21.6 20.1 19.2 Nickel' 29.8 20.4 18.2 Potassium 18.6 3.04 2.57 Rubidium 29.8 16.2 18.9 Selenium ND 20.2 19.5 Silver' 31.9 31.0 29.2 Strontium 15.2 3.38 3.98 Thallium 39.0 16.0 19.5 Thorium NR NR NR Tin ND 14.1 15.3 Titanium 13.3 4.15 3.74 Vanadium NR NR NR Zinc 26.6 13.3 11.1 Zirconium 20.2 5.63 5.18 Source: Reference 4 a These values may be biased high because the concentration of these analytes in the soil samples was near the detection limit. ND Not detected. NR Not reported. CD-ROM 6200 - 27 Revision 0 January 1998 a CD o (n N (*] 04 to Cl)(M+) M 04 V N lII (ff o U O 4) M {` ti M Ir QQ) o 00 N N (D O 00 N to 2 U w {,j i tl3 C") + ill N (Df-- a0 c0 V' Cl) ' (h N m C) m 4) N CL C 0 til (D ' N N (� (p o 00 M 00 (D N (D M I� M (D 00 co � x C ll] ' m O4 co M Co 1- Q { h N CD p rn cM N m �r c'] a) N [- m r CDNr N M U N Q (0o (D 1, 00 CO t0 r M T T (D CO N f- LQ O N U m + 00 �r C)El T O) 4) i i i r 00 0) O o a) W 0� 00t- 00 O LLi dj W N X C M 0 t- T T CO N r ' ' � N r 4 cri N ti N 06 (V 00 ce) (*) (ri i~ Q) C M It r i i O a) M CD o f(D co i• ON 0)) C Q ca t tr)ca (? O N Cl) it) (Y) C O S 4 t d i z m coo CD (3) OO CD T M O Q t'? m Q Q OO T IN Co C) co O Z I- l Z Z M N C (j M C0 ch M IT: O 1- C� 00 (D Cl) M a) (.i ui v ao to <9 OD c+i 4i N 4 d) O N 4) cl) T C7 0') O (3) W O C') M O Q T T T T T T O O Z Q) LO 00 (3) CO O U7 00 M �t N W (D Li tt r 4) N f� V w O N 1- Cl) O 00 CO d7 4) r W (D ca O (D m m O m f- w 00 On T N uO O N N 00 (D T (h 00 T Lt I T T _T to 0 Q m V u` U u- a- C 2 2 in N C7 00 � (t3 C � ll. i x iL L_ D C O Y C N U C O U N L (a f) M -O W U 7 O Q u m 00 tz N N 7 7 U ' (Q cmi O N m Oro q] C L m co Q 7 ul (0 � (U 1O !� Q) (D N CD 4} U :s m ui W .0 c n. cu U a co O N C C C--.O- L 0 d E (4 7 w -R lg O U O Q3 � C Q C W U i3 3 O v O z 65 z O U ti U o QQ� ❑ (n �0)zo cl� cD O Q V' Q 6> N O vi N cD O rn 0) Z N Z � (n M h -�r (� It N (on)r m m m 0) h N 00 0 r r r ro� Z Z CO (D MN °O r cD a)U N d a iL7 (*) I- It [D (D (N N M r (D N U i4 V N N (n to M o M w r 4 cD N 4 j cD O m c) N O CD It (D N C 0 U) (D d r U7 M � IT no" N U Cl) r co N cD M OO Q (D r c� a Q U) Cl? N U dy <9 (o V Z r` (n O _ aO Z Ct) cV OD N a r cD �- O 00 O (D Co (h m o a !� V' (D Q N 47 (V a [] h N O r- 70 ui U '4- 'V' d z v O h (V Z (D (q m (D(a to c C) Nt N r-- CO r ch 4) us 0 g U CY) M r to E• r N to a V O r N N Cn Q O - a = N (D cMD N No UNCF) U Nt (n r LO u) h v to Q N Q Q r Q N 0� N r ti Z Z Z W Z ((D 00 O (D C'M ao 0 co M (D (,� cD Q Q 'cr' Q (D M CL Vl U (D 00 a Z O Z z M Z O CD h 4) D l� C M (n r Co = M M r o 4) O N cV U �U N tM (D O CD �t O (D (D N o0 o U U U7 Q c17 UA ch 0 r In Q r (D C7 Z w a d co r� Z 6i co m r M r O) r r r r d O r M r N r o 0 Z U) Q O r r N d M N (D h Z U (� z 03 CDR wm !+ (D N (a N o 03 N w N m nU � M "d' d N 6 0 � � � CD 0 EO N co h h rn Ito C�7 U Q i i Q CA M 'cr Q Q m Z N Z w m Lo Z Z ti O) Co CD r co 0 U Q N i i Q O N Q Q I i '( to V z 'ITZ M N r h Z Z �U 00 t- i i a co O N h � UQ N M N M �- cD N N U N (D N C13 � -T n! cD t U Q 4 r r � (D U U U U {/) U N N N N U cv �, cU U U Cn (n Ln (n (n cn z Q Cn 0l � m m D a z z z z 0 cn co 0) N 0 a N CD E ca rn 0 Y 41 Q cn E c0 s~ Ut E C N T C 0 y N 43 ca o -a U � U d) 4) (D U U 5^ O- Z Q (� C C 4) CL - 4) o O 0 o (D¢0-zzz U [Y � O Q Q t t4 W o zz U } a a a O O O) u- uu (n -i w UJ Fc to a a z O N co w uw w Q O M [3] . h en h OR M O1 0) CD Q N O M CD tC1 CD O CD c? O Ca n O O O O O O O Ca CD m O m O m CD 0) c- M h cD N 4 t0 cq C7 V 0n C [�D M C*] � r tYl CC j (•7 !Z O OL V IL 6Mi rn W W Oh] QM]rn = �"� � O h i cD CO O O M h Ma cn h 0 Ca o 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C OOo CA 000 M (MD It Cl) r LO N It N V) N v N C cOo N i coo r o r h v v O- � �# Cn O O CO CD O CD to d CCl m O N CC] O C7 CC] d to CC] O O (fJ to m O co m O O co O 00 CD 6 !� co O co M O O O r r O r M O CD CO N It N O M h V' h co In CD IT O CD It (0 CA CO U') — CO r CO h r I— N O h r Cp r M (D M 0400 M r r �fi 7 t) C_ 4 r f� CO C7 CD cA U') a0 `tY' CD h [D O !� M m a0 Cl) [A LO M O CS] <D h CfJ (F7 M [A v C D O O 0 C7 O O O O O Q Ca O Ca O O CD C CO M CV O N W M C M O LA N M N CC') CD co N h d' h f� g- M O rn C7 rn C7 00� O O rn CD W O OL O (n to d Q] M O h D7 <D O CA O CD ad O O Q] O M CA O O O co r N C] W r CD W — to (0 N — (q� r r IR r � N O N " M -- t♦1 M b rn rn C� i ao h Cn CD Cn co rn N Cn rn M rn O rn O ao h rn ao Cs c0 G� CD O o CD C7 C5 C7 Cl C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 V co m ! h M +h to h r f� CO M N O C N CD m i Q Q O O C CD N Cf'] m O m O Q CO M -Kt N N N N N M V' Cl) Cl) N Cl) Cl) r cu Q r N M N M cuCL r N M r N C M V' — •O O O - - L a.. — O O O s.. lu D (n � a. �—cn rn cn a c C6O to w � 0 eo CL d N N C7 --a O :E o.,.......-- CO O C U_ `�- o,Eccti 0 7 0'E O Z U Z QJ U U n - c -L = i O M 4 O CV co 2 O 0 0 t METHOD 6200 FIELD PORTABLE X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL AND SEDIMENT start I A Follow manufacturers' manrrat for operation of FPXRF insturmentafion. 11-2 In situ Type of intrusive ana lysls mode. 11.3 Remove debris from 11 .4 Collect sample from soil surface and level a 4 x 4 inch square of surface, it necessary. Tap soil. suit to increase density and compactness. Sample 11.3 Perform analysis. <-7bylng? zatio1Follow preparation before procedure to achieve your rJOQs_ Yes 11.4 Thoroughly mix sample in a beaker or plasllG hag_ Monitor homogenization with sodium fluorescein dye. 11.5 Dry 20 - 50 grams of sample (or 2 - 4 hours at a temp. no greater than 150 °C. 11.6 Ground sample until 90% of ariginal sample passes through a 60-mesh sieve. 11.6 Plaoe sample in polyethylene sample cup and perform anatysm, stop CD-ROM 6200 - 31 Revision 0 January 1998 C.................. ', Shaw F' Shaw Environmental, Inc. 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 214-277-7800 FAX: 214-277-8600 Appendix 2 Data Tables, Borings Logs, and Analytical Data TABLE 1 CUMULATIVE SOIL DATA VCP 1359 Sample lU - Siill'i[r f ar�11� Ckafa Arsenic, It;jl `=mq ljari�rm, TkaJ Cadmiriin. 7rrlal Chrornulm, rsaal Cop t, TCtr;til I_e49d, I�,rnE MeiLury, Fn1aI SGtytr danurrl.3rlJ�gtr lot r Nlokel. TORT Sea[aniti To(ul SI[v r. Tow `p lum, ToloJ i tilJ tll,E�Irl Votal 5.9 -- V24 . NA' _ 14A NA 'RA _NX NA NA NA NA NAi NA NJl NA NA NA NA NA NA ro NA ^ NA NA NA NVA NA NA NA NA MA glA NA NA 77 NA . NA = _ RA NA rf1Q rJ 300 2,euu -� NA NA� NA NA NA NA NA NA I4JA NA NA _ N _ NA F9 .-NA NA RA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N NA NA _WA_ ILIA 1~L1 VW NA NA NA NA NA A NA NA rrlF NE 52 NA i�lA NA NA NA NA MA RA N4}A _NA NA NA NA N A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MAJ NA N4[A 14A NA NA NA NA. NA NA WA_ NA J4J4 NSA 0 I q- q- I 30 30,0o0 NA NA WA fi+1,4 NA JNA NA NA NA NA NA A' A NA NA _ NA NA hJA NA NA NA. A NA NAB #A ' N NA NA NA NA MAI NA NA NA NA NA rplgVK9 15 550 10.6 6.3 5.5 ii 4.RJ 3.6 6.8. 1.8U 4.6 ; 4.9 1..8 7.7 4.5. 5.7 3.2 2.0U ° 4.8 , 5.5 6.0 6.7 6.5 2.01, 6.0 4.4 2.8 19.5 29.4 37.3 55.1._ 64.8 31.1 12.8 14.1 22.7 8.1 � 40.6 64.9 12.6 38.8 m 1.5 500 P4A NA ILIA NA r%?A NA NA NA NA 10 RA NA l NA rWA f�dA RA _NA 11lA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NIA NA NA NA N+J11 NA ,M 2:04 - 3.6 NA NA HA IqA NA NA NA NA NA ILIA NA A NA _ NA _ _NA 7�I NA NA NA NAk NA NA NA NA N NA NA NA N KA NA NA NA NA NAl NA NA OVA InNIKu NE 160 9.9U 7.3U 7.9U 20AU 9.7U 10.6U 9.1U 10.1U 11.6U 8.3U 7.OU 9.6U 11U 9.9U IOU 11.8U 8.2U 9.6U 11.8u 9.OU 7.5U 9.4U 7.9U 6.3U 26.5 149 29 775 48.1 144 21 U 22.1 U 18.9U 20.41J 140 29aD 92.6 82 rrjglKg!11 10 830 10.7 8.7 8.3 4.3 4.9 : 7.$ 1.8U 9.5 7.1 2.5 10.3 5.2 7.7 4.1 3.9 : 6.8 7 7.5 8.8 9.9 3.8 8.8 5 3.6 25.6 91,8 30.2 130 55.7 25.9 8.4U 13.1 7.6U 8.2U 42 2921 20 31.4 0,3 310 - ! Ili [�jA NA h!A _ N.4 _ NA NA NA 'WX NA NA Nq M1JA h1q NA NA NA NA J+A_ _Tjw _:.J rJA NA NA NA NA IAA NA NA NA NA RA NA NA NA NA NA NA m NE 96 taA I%w _ NAs ILIA NA P1�1 NA r4Ar NA NA WA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA - NA NA NA _ h!A NA NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NA NA NV NA mg 0 NE 290 f - T24.4 13.7 15.2 10.31_1 10A 12.2 3 15.7 _ 12.4 5.2U 13.3 8.8 14.2 _ 8.4U 6.2 12,3 14.2 11.5 15 17.7 _ 7.8 R 16.3 � 7.2 5.7 39.2 1581 28.1 17.3 18.8 14 22.3 24.0 17.5 10.2 37.7 51.8 20 32.9 Irlt1 rI 7 1 000 4.0 `� 4.0 3.1` _,. 4.1U 2.7 3.7 1.8U 4.3 3.3 1.7 4.8 2.2 2.8. 2.7 2.0U 2.5 _ 2.5 3.5 3.7 _ 4.7 1.6 4.0 2.4 1.9 44.1 91.4 14.7 58 10.3 15.0 10_5il 11.1 U 9.5U 10.2U 67.1 658 40.9A 41.2 20,000 NE NA N NA RA NA NA MA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ak A NA - _A f .ISJA NA NA NA ttA �lA NA NA NA NA NA FdA hlA NA !3A IAA NA aNA MOW NE NE NA NA NA NA NA NA NAMW-09A NA - IAA RA NA NA NAB �+A NA Al NA NA UA NA NSA l�iA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA . NA NA h7A WA NA NA T.SBC - M_D-Adj PCL 1VJonitor Wells ---__ - - `07111195 - MW-05. - - J 5 7' MW-05 15-17' 07/11195 MW-06A 27.5-29.5' 07/12/95 MW-06B 44-46' 09/15/95 MW-07 26-28' 07/11195 MW-08A 35-36' 07/14/95 MW-08A MW-08B MW-096 54-55' 29-31' 27 28' 45-46' 07/14/95 09/03/95 07/13/95 09/18/95 MW-10A 43-44' 09/16/95 MW-10B MW-11A 25-26' 23-24' 09/17/95 09/11/95 MW-11 B 24-26' 09/12/95 MW-12A 46-48' 09108/95 MW-12B 29-30' 09/09/95 MW-12B du 29-30' 09/09/95 MW-13 34-36' 08/31/.95 MW-14A 30-31' 09/01/95 MW-14B 29-32' 09107l95 MWA5A 38-40' 09/02/95 MW-15B MW-16 EUIW _17- - - - S5-01 - 29-31' 36-38' 39 41' - 0-1' - 09/06/95 08/29195 08/30/95 --- General Plant Sample 09/18/89 SS-02 SS 03 0-1' 0-1' 09/18/89 09118l89 SS-04 SS-05 SS-06 SS-07 SS-07 du SS-08 SS-13 SS-14 SS-15 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 09/18/89 0911$189 09/18/89 09/18/89 09/18189 09118/891 09/18/89 09/18189 09/18/89 SS-16 01' 09118189 SS-17 0-1. 09/18/89 SS-18 SS-19 0-1' 0-1' 091181$9 09/18/89 NA MA RA r+1A "NA NA NA NA "A Nil IqA NA NA [JA NA NA FAA' NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NSA NA NA NA NA WA_ ^ NA NA _ NAk NA NA NA NA NA NA NA _ NA 99.3. 21 24.6 q59 63 32 17.8 21.2 64.2 23.5 30 M1lA _ h �1 NA NA _NA -NA A NA NA NA NAk HA NA NA NA NAw NA NA -' NA - NA �71 125 138 1610 25.5 46.7 6.7.5 22.5U a62 44A 45A 54.6 _ 7.5U 11 � 312 8.2 10. 9.3 16.7 _ 55.6 14.5 57.6 NA NA NA NX NA N� NA NA N,IA NA � M1JA1 NA NA {V NA NA NA NA _ NA NA NA N 50.8 20 28.3 Ho 14.7 15,2 14.1 26.4 41.3 ' 1.3.3 � 67.1 78.2{47{� 14.5 1T-4 184 9.4U 8.2 10.6U 11.3U 190 9.7 112 NA NA NA NA NA NA �JA NA NA Nr1 NA NA W Nr'l NA 'IAA gyp, NA NA SS-19 du SS-20 SS-21 SS-22 0-11 0-1' 0-1' 0-1' 09/1.8199 09/18/89 09/18/89 09/18/89 SS23 0 1' 09/18/89 SS-24 0-1' 09/18/89 SS-30 0-1' 09/18/89 . SS-31 0-1' 09/18/89 SS-32 0-1' 09/18/89 55-32 du 0-1' 09/18/89 NA _ ,1A _ J OVA _ NA WA t A WA NA NA N11 NA h!A NAI rqA1 NA NA NA NR N A WA NA NA NA NA NA NA hJA NA NA A NA NA MA NA N,kA NA � 31 65.9 45.$ 35.7 13 27.3 20.8 38.41 24.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAJ NA NA NA NA NA --- NA, NA11 NA 1-1141 NA 42.6 147 65.5 112 21.311 20.5U 47.5 75.4 50.3 49.3 36.2 35.4 9.6 10.7 180 8.7l1 9.9 14A -NA'I- NAJ NA NA NA NA _W4 NPA NA NI_ MA 1qA r�A NA NA NSA NA 68.9 64.2 32.3 42A t6.9 11.4 19.8 6230 '�17n 98 163 187 66.$. 90.7U 10.31) 9.1 10.SU G �11 NA NA NAJ NA NA NA _ -RA] ��� � V rn NA NA NA W fJA 14A NA NA ��x SS-33 0-1' 09/18/89 SS-34 0-1' 09/18/89 SS-35 0-1' 09/18/89 SS-36_ ' 0-1' 0.5-6' 09/18/89 0911$189 South' Disposa[ Area - SB-04 SB-05 0.5-6' 09/18/89 S6-06 SB 06 du 0.5-6' 0.5-6' 09/18/89 09/1.8189 TABLE 1 CUMULATIVE SOIL DATA VCP 1359 IN(]R('nk[ir'. rr)MPol ininc TABLE 1 CUMULATIVE SOIL DATA VCP 1359 - -� INORGANIC COMPOUNDS I '.-a11iin SjmpJL-ID So�nplr� Ari�eole, DfIHUHI. CadlrlJial)l, [; tTolt arm. r(p P I-ead. rviwiuc �lersut�r, WWI, Sfiteniurrm. 6ilwaT. Va?O um, .Cab�tk, Sodium, Df!P11+ Bate TiDWI Iotal Taiak tuial Tula] �okal I'€�ia! Tom Ta sal Tukaa Tn1ai 1'nt�k Total Told SMxlf�te - - -- rsgc - m 9 mg 6 rn3 mc1 0 mg 9 mp 0 N g rrl q ati ) rRII 0 m 0 m9 T _ MSf3-Ad' PCL 1 5.9 24 300 2,800 NE 52 ,!U 30,000 16-1-15 550 500 0.04 3.6 NE 160 10 0.3 IVE E 7 20 000 NE - - SCI-06 10-1.0.5' 10/01/91 wk NAJI "1A NA NA FLq NA NA WU �!A 310 96 90 ,000 E NE SCI 06 20-20.5' 1010119t NA #VFW JA NA NA NA IAA :NA NA KAI NA NA t#n `^ NA WA 1420 SCI-06 25-25.5' 10/01/91 ; NA NA i r•IA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Nil 227', NA SCI-07 5-5.5' 10/01/91 _ NA NA r NA NA A NA NA A NA tiA NA _ NA 140 SCI-07 10-10.5' 10/01/91 lA htA _ '-I�FIk NA NA NA 1MVA N/� NA NA fIq MA 192 SCI-07 20-20.5' 10/01/91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I�I,A nIA tdA NA _ N1� NA _ NA 391 391 SB-15 1-2' 07119/95 NA NA NA NA 10.3 NA NA 11.7U 11.2 NA IAA NA 19.9 5.0 PEA NA 764 SB-75 .5-6' 07/19/95 NA NA NA NA 9.4 RA NA 9.1U 12.6- NA NA 24.8 4.2 NA NA SB-15 9.5-10' 07/19/95 _ NA NA NA - NA 7.2 ; NA 'NA 8.2U 11.3 NA NA 20.7 5,6 NJ NA NA SB-16 0.5-1' 07/19/95 NIA NA NA NA _ 59.1 NA NA 94.8 38.8 INA NA 34.6 91.8 NA NA 58-16 5-6' 07119/951 NA ILIA NA _ hqA 9.3 NA Nil 90.5U 10.7 NA NA 21.2 3.5 NA NA SB-16 9.5-10, 07/19/95 NANA NA NA 6.6 NA NA 10.9U 10.6 A 21.5 4.7 t4A NA SB-17 1-2' 07/19/95 N11 _ _ IUAt A Iyi1 $3.8 t+lA NA 138 56.2:. NA KA 27.6 93.8 NA NA SB-17 5-6' 07/19/95 NA NP, NA NA 8.1 NA NA 14.9 11.5 NA NA 21.6 4.7 IAA NA 5B-17 9.5-10, 07/19/95 NA FAA NA _ WA 8.3 NA HA 11.6U 13.7 NA 23.4 5.5 NA NA 1RP501 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 6U1 <0.2 7.6 12 _ 7.4 <0.2 2.2 11 <1.p <0.35 21 5.6 `- NA <50 1 RPS02 5-T 07/20/01 <1.0 60 <0.2 7.9 12- 10 <0.2 1.$ 8.6. <1.0 <0.35 16 3.8 : NA 50 1 RPS03 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 68 <0.2 7.1 8.0 5.4 <0.2 <0.25 8.5 <1.0. <0.35 17 4.41 NA 294 1 RPSO4 5-7' 07/20/01 <1.0 81 <0.2 7.5 13 14 <0.2 0.61 10 <1.0 <0.35 18 4.3 NA 74 1 RPW05 0-2' 07/20/011 <1.0 66 <0.2 7.7 9.4 6.4. <0.2 0.51 7.8 <1.0 <O.35 17 3.3 NA <50 1RPWD6 5-T 07/20/01 <1-01 71 <0.2 8.8 10 11 <0.2 1.Y 8 <1.0 <0.35 15 4.0 NA 59 1RPW07 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 67 <0.2 8.1 13 6.2 <0.2 1.6 9.9 <1.0 <0.35 21 4.6 1RPWOJ3 5-7' 07/20/01 <1.0 84 <0.2 15 11 9.8 <0.2 0.86 9.9 <1.0 <O.35 19 4.4 hJA NA <50 1 RPN09 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 71 <0.2 12 10 6.2 <0.2 1.1 8.8 <1.0 <0.35 20 3.8 I%tA 209 <500 1RPN10 5-T 07/20/01 <1.0 60 <0.2 12 9.8 6.5 <0.2 1.2 8.6 <1.0 <0.35 14 4.4 NA 68 1.RPE11 0-2' 07120701 <1.0 71 <0.2 12 15 14 <0.2 1.5 13 71.0 <0.35 30 6.5 NA 50 IRPE12 1RPE13 5-7' 0.7/20/01 <1.0 81 <0.2 131 13 15 <0.2 11 9.8 <1.0 <0.35 17 4.6 NA <100 1RPE14 0-2' 07120/01 <1.0 75 <0.2 1. 9.8 14 10 <0.2 2.3 8.6 <1..6 <0.35 19 4.3 A 132 5-T 07/20/01 <1.0 75 <0.2 12 14 6.6 <0.2 5.7 11 71.0 <O.35 17 5.9 NA 818 1 RPC15 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 61 <0.2 12 11 7.8 <0.21 1.5 8.1 <1.0 <0.35 17 3.2 NA 5740 1 RPC16 2-4' 07/20/01 <1.0 61 <0.2 9.6 10 6.7 <0.21 1.3 7.6. <1.0 <0.35 15 3.5 NA 5590 1RPC17 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 39 <0.2 7.6 11 5.6 <0.21 0.96 8.2 <1,0 <0.35 18 4.5 NA _ 4260 1 RPC18 2-4' 07/20/01. <1.0 50 <0.2 13. 9,0 6.2 <0.2 1.2 7.3 <1.0 <0.35 15 3.7 NA 5890 2RPS19 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 78 <0.2 12 19 7.5 <0.2 <0.25 121 <1.0 0.41 27 5.5 NA 428 2RPS20 5-T 07/20/01 <1.0 53 <0.2 6.9 13 14 <0.2 8.2 9.9 <1.0 0.37 20 _ 4.4 CIA 600 2RPS21 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 77 <0.2 11 10 7.3 <0.2 2.1 8 <1.0 <0.35 18 _ 3.7 NA 164 2RPS22 5-7' 07/20/01 <i A 25 <0.2 4,0 5..6 7.3 <0.2 13 3.1 <1.0 <0.35 8.3 2.0TNA 0 2RPW23 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 73 <0.2 8.9 13 7.2 <0.2 2 10 <1.0 <0.35 22 4.76 2RPW24 5-T 07/20101 <1.0 56 <0.2 9.3 5.8 8,2 <0.2 11 2.6 <1.0 <0.35 7.2 1.20 2RPW25 0-2' 07/20101. 3.8 74 <0.2 10 20 41 <0.2 7 12 <1.0 <0.35 19 7.30 2RPW26 5-7' 07/20/01 9.4 68 <0.2 8.0 11 51 <0.2 26 6.6 <1.0 <0.35 10 4.41 2RPN27 0-2' 07/20/01 5.6 67 <0.2 8.5 31 39 <0.2 15 13 <1.0 <0.35 28 8.85 2RPN28 5-T 07120I01 <i.0 97 <0.2 11 9.8 7.7 <0.2 1.4 9.2 <1.0 <0.35 - 15 4.2 NA 2960 2RPN29 0-2' 07/20101 <1.0 71 <0.2 12 10 7.8 <0.2 5.4 8.6 <1.0 <0.35 20 4.2. NA 148 2RPN30 5-7' 07/20/01 <1.0 78 <0,21 12 14 8 <0.2 2.2 9.4 <1.0 <0.35 16 T4- NA 3320 2RPE31 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 74 <0.8 9.2 13i 15 <0.2 16 6.5 <1.0 <0.35 20 _ 7.5_ NA 114 2RPE32 5-T 07/20/01 <1.0 74 <0.2 10 21 31 <0.21 54 20 <1.0 <0.35 1.9 20 NA 4400 2RPE33 0-2' 07/20/01 <3.0 16 1.0 5.0 17 8..5 <0.2. 52 12 <1.0 <0.35 18 15 _ NA 1250 2RPE34 5-7' 07/20/01 <1.0 72 <0.2 12 14 9.1 <0.2 6 8.3 <1.0 <0.35 15 3.4 16JA 13800 2RPC35 .0-2' 07120/0i <1.0 91 <0.2 12 9.2 7.2 <0.2 26 9.5 <1.0 <0.35 19 4.0 NIA 3310 2RPC36 2-4' 07/20/01 <2.0 63 <0.2 7.5 9.4 5.7 <0.2 101 10 <1.0 <0.35 22 7.1 _ Nll 3950 2RPC37 0-2' 07/20/01 <2.0 91 <0,2 11 49 6.6 <0.2 I i." 1 29 <1.0 <0.351 20. 93 1R 2780 2RPC38 24 07/20/01 <1.0 46 <0.2 5.8 41 5.5 <0.2 29 <1.0 <0.35 16 79 ` 1A 1120 3RPW39 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 72 <0.2 7.0 11 9.4 <0.2 16 9.8 <1.0 <0.35 20 4.7 Nl1 2360 3RPW40 5-7' 07/20/01 <1.0 6.7 <0.2 6.2 18 6.4 <0.21 1..6. 13 <1.0 <0.35 18 4.9 KA 3350 3RPN41 0-2' 07/20/01 <1.0 68 <0.2 6.4 11 8.2 <0.2 14 1.0 <1.0 <0.35 20 4.5 N., $630 3RPN42 5-T 1 07/20/01 <1.01 1001 0.841 5.0 40 44 <0.2 32 5.8 <1.0 19 26 1.7 CAA 44600 3RPN43 0-2' 07/20/01 <J.OL 641 <0.2 5.9 8.41 8.7 <0.2 5,2 7.8 <1.0 <0.35 19 3.3 N�1 351.0 TABLE 1 CUMULATIVE SOIL DATA VCP 1359 INInP('-A Mir' OnNADrlf Mine TABLE 1 CUMULATIVE SOIL DATA VCP 1359 INORGANIC COMPOUNDS TSBC = Texas -specific Median Backgroun Concentration NE = Not Established A=xr�G�jy MSD-Adj PCL = Critical Residential PCL (30-acre source area) within Municipal Setting Designation T USGS Background level for Texas Soils Chemical Anatyses of Soils and Other Surfkial Materials of the Conterminous United States-1981 TABLE 2 ADDITIONAL SOIL DATA VCP 13.59 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS - TSBG I Ili Sample Depth Datet rpm NQ 4A) TPH icu to 5:J1� TPH + hC2 u i:4j TPH 1i:e 14 CxJ Vo{s NE NE NE NE Various MSD-Adj PCL _ 230 970 970 NE Various W&M Wooded Area W&M Extension of Calhoun SDA-SB-05 8' 09/21/06 _ NA NA NAI NA ND SDA-SB-08 8' 09/21/06 IAA WA- NIA NA }.li,I Nbr ND SDA-SB-10 Calhoun-SB-01 8' 09/21/06 NA NA NJA ND 4-6' 09/07/06 ND N51 ND ND Calhoun-SB-02 4-6' 09/07/06 ND NDI ND NDI ND Calhoun-SB-03 4-6' 09/07/06 NDi NDI ND NDI ND CalhounSB-04 GP-A1- - 4-6' 09/07/06 L ND ND ND ND ND ND Shaw -- 1-2' 1/31/2007 ND - ND - ND ND=_- PRAA A GP-A8 1-2' 1/31/2007 ND ND ND IUD ND' Shaw GP-134 1-2' 1/31/2007 ND ND ND ND NO PRAA B GP-138 1-2' 1/31/2007 ND ND ND ND ND GP-B10 1-2' 1/31/2007 ND 19.3 51.2 70.7i ND GP-B12 1-2' 1/31/2007 ND i.lA, NZI — iUD _ _ND HA �i�lA _ ND I+. �Jl - �- Np ND :- I ::... --._-...- ND ND GP-B20 8-9' 3/5/2007 ND GP-B20 10-11, 3/512007 ND 1 7—GP-B22 - � • 1 3/5/2007 _--_- ND ND Q-11 3/5/2007 ND ND ND ND ND U= above the SDL, but below MDL. NE = Not Established ND = Not Detected NA = Not Analyzed All concentrations depicted as mg/Kg Drilling LogSha 4 Soil Baring GP-B1 5 Page: 1 of 1 p ct FormerAmerican Cyanamid p NA CoMM1;NTS role _ wrier Location Fort Worth, Texas Proj. No. _ 124883 Surface Elev. NA Total Hole Depth 8-0 0• North East — Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Fill Material Rig/Core Drill Co. Marna Core Method Power Probe Drifter K.Burdick Log By M.Franco Date 315107 Permit # NA Checked By K. Tramm, P.G. License No_ 805 vi ov 0 Description ro U o a o U rj u Q 0 m J U (Color, Texture, Structure) a m Geologic Descriptions are Based on the USCS. 0 1 3 (0-1) 4.5 (1-2') GC r 4 —1I s 0 R=0I '!MM1.0.IR! 0 ii 6 8 0 10 Asphalt (with roadbase material) Fill Clay mixed with Concrete - medium brown, firm, dry. ,_, r_ -firm'Clay -medium brown, #irm, dry. ry- ------------------------------------- Clay - medium brown, firm, dry. End of Boring at 8 ft. Drilling Log Soil Boring GP-1316 Page: 1 of 1 Former American Cyanamid NA COfvMEIVrS Protect Oi Owner Location Fort WOFth, Texas Proi. No. 124883 Surface Elev. NA Total Hole Depth 8-Oft- North East Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Fill Material Rig/Core Drill Co. Magna Core Method Power Probe Driller K.Burdick Log By M-Franco Date Y5107 Pen -nit # NA Checked By K. Tramm, P.G. License No. 805 _ Description 00 Qp 0 m x a Q ID; u 0 (Color, Texture, Structure) Geologic Descriptions are Based on the USCS_ 0 it 0 2 0 (2-T) 0 (3-4) 4 0 0 0 � 6 �j o I1(6-7') l� 0 I1(7-8') U1 8 0 W I- r U a n2 10 La K 0 m D Z C� 4 Z Z 1§ tic Fill Clay mixed with Concrete - medium brown, soft, dry. Clay -medium brown, soft to firm, dry. — — — — — — — — — — — — — F. — — _ — CL End of Boring at 8 ft. JF 12 Drilling Log Soil Boring GPm1317 Page: 1 of 1 Proiect Former American Cyanamid Owner NA COMMENTS Location Fort Worth, Texas Proj. No. 124883 Surface Elev_ NA Total Hole Depth 8-0 d- North East Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA W Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Fill Material Rig/Core Drill Co_ Magma Core Method Power Probe Driller K•Burdick Log By M.Franco pate 315107 Permit# NA Checked By K. Tramm, P.G. License No. 805 z Description t Q^ o O ° a - o U o D a o 0 U (Color, Texture, Structure) m Geologic Descriptions are Based on the USCS. 0 ° (0-1') Asphalt (with roadbase material) GC Fill Clay mixed with Concrete - medium brown, dry. 0 (1-Z) ---------------------------------- Clay - medium brown, firm, dry. 2 0 (2-3') CL 0 (3-4') ° — Clay medium brown, firm, dry. — — — — — _ — 0 6 i 0 (6-71 CL 0 (7-') 8 0 10 End of Boring at 8 ft. 12 Drilling Log Oww -- Soil Boring GP-1318 Page: 1 of 1 Former American C anamid NA COMMENTS Project r Y Owner Location Fort Wodh, Texas Proi, No, 124883 Surface Elev. NA Total Hole Depth 8.0 8- North East Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Fill Material Rig/Core Drill Co. Magna Core Method Power Probe Driller K.Burdick Log By M.Franco Date 315107 Permit # NA Checked By K. Tramm, P-G. License No. 805 _ Description Q^ ❑ - U no U (Color, Texture, Structure) m :3 Geologic Descriptions are Based on the USCS. 0 (o Sandy Clay mixed with gravel, - medium oc o n-z'i N 2 0 0 4 0 0 L-10 CL Clay - medium brown, f rm, dry— — — — — — End of Boring at 8 ft. 12 i Drilling Log %_. _.. Soil Boring CP-519 Page: 1 of 1 Former American Cyanamid NA 1COMMENTS Project Owner Location Fort Worth, Texas Proj No 124883 Surface Elev, NA Total Hale Depth 8.0 ft. North East Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Fill Material Rig/Core Drill Co. Magna Core Method Power Probe Driller K.Surdick Log By M.Franco Date VV07 Permit # NA Checked By K. Tramm, P-G. License No. 805 Description Q^ Q E C j ii n o L) a a s a m (Color, Texture, Structure) Z) Geologic Descdptions are Based on the USCS. 0 (0-t't Sandy Clay mixed with gravel- medium brown, soft I loose, dry. 3 (1-2') GC 2 3 12-3,1 Clay -medium br`wnn, fir_m --soft,—d— - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . ] Iln a rs-n't 6 -11 0 11(6-7) I�///////�I 11 Moist at 7 to 8 ft. 0 8 —II 0 10 1 11 11 11 11 End of Boring at 8 ft. 12 Drilling Log _ Soil Boring GP-1320 Page: 1 of 1 Project Former American Cyanamid Owner NA COMMENTS Location Fort Worth, Texas Proi. No. 124883 Surface Elev- NA Total Hole Depth 12.0 #• North East Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Pill Material Rig/Core Drill Co. Magna Core Method Power Probe Driller KBurdick Log By M.Franco Date 3/5/07 Permit# NA Checked By K. Tramm, P.G. License No. 805 _ N Description Q o a o U o ° n o m J o (Color, Texture, Structure) Geologic Descriptions are Based on die USCS. — 0 0 (0-11) Sandy Clay mixed with Gravel - medium brown, soft I loose, dry- 0 (t-2) Gc 2 0 (2-S) Clay - medium brown, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — to soft, dry.. o (34) 4 ° Glass 1 Bottle - amber I clear at 3 ft. CL 0 6 0 (6-7.) 4 to 4.5 ft. - Sand Like Material - white, dense, dry. 0 (7-8) 0 Clay - medium brown, soft to firm, dry to moist 8 0 0-9') CL 8 to 9 ft. - Sand -Like Material Mixed with Clay - white, moisture increases i 0 �o.) with depth. 10 0 (to- 11.) __ __ —__ ._ _— — — — — — — — — — __------ Clay - medium to fight brown, soft, moist. LL - 0 (tf- .12.) CL w r z r 12 1 a 14 End of Boring at 12 ft. FC Drilling Log Soil Boring GP-1321 Page: i of 1 Project Former American Cyanamid owner NA COMMENTS Location Fort Worth, Texas Proj No 124863 Surface Elev. NA Total Hole Depth 8-0 ff. North East Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Fill Material' Rig/Core Drill, Co- Magna Core Method Power Probe Driller K.Burdick Log By M.Franco Date 315101 Permit # NA Checked By K. Tramm, P.G. License No, 805 Description a� mr a ifm'o Qd �j > W am �J V1 (Color, Texture, Structure) m of Geologic Descriptions are Sased on the USCS. 0 ° (0-1) Sandy Clay mixed with Gravel - medium brown, fine, soft to firm, dry. 0 (1-2') GC Plastic chip at 1.5 ft. 2 0 (2-3') ° () Claymedium brown, mottled white, firm, d _ _ T — T _ _ _ - dry, sand -like material mixed. _ CL — 4 0 —_-------------------------------------- Clay - medium brown, firm, dry. 0 6 a (6-7 ) CL 0 (7-W) 10 End of Boming at 8 ft. 12 Drilling Log Soil Boring GP-1322 Page: 1 of 1 Project Former American Cyanamid owner NA COMMENTS Location Fort Worth, Texas — Proj. No. 124883 Surface Elev. NA Total Hole Depth 8.0 8. North East Top of Casing NA Water Level Initial NA Static NA Diameter Screen: Dia NA Length NA Type/Size NA Casing: Dia NA Length NA Type NA Fill Material Rig/Core Drill Co. Magna Core Method Pawer Probe Driller K Burdick Log By M.Franco Date 3/5/0/ Permit # NA Checked By K. Tramm, P-G- License No. 805 Description Q^ AE= mo U m a.rn U m d a w chi m vl o w 0 w U v (Color, Texture, Structure) °4 Geologic pescdptions are Based on the USCS. 0 (0_� ) 0 (1-2') GC 2 A o 0 4 A o - dry. 6 — I --- ----------— -- — — — — — — — — — _. — — — Cly -medium brown, sofa, d--- ry, 0 fl M////�ICL11 Firm to very film at7to8ft. 6 0 a c� a U1. 0 a 0 m 8 0 LL J III Z f- J - b t 10 n u K 7 0 7 7 9 a 12 End of Boring at 8 ft. Environmental Laboratories State Certifications -- Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 460 W. Bethany fed. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana:02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page. Page 1 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #-. 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13107 14:23 Attached is our analytical report for the samples received for your project. Below is a list of your individual sample descriptions with our corresponding laboratory number. We also have enclosed a copy of the Chain of Custody that was received with your samples and a form documenting the condition of your samples upon arrival. Please note any unused portion of the samples may be discarded upon expiration of the EPA holding time for the analysis performed or after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise. ERMI Environmental Laboratories certifies that all results contained in this report were produced in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) unless otherwise noted The results presented apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain -of -custody document(s) furnished with the samples. This report is intended for the sole use of the customer for whom the work was performed and must be reproduced, without modification, in its entirety. Sample Identification Laboratory ID # Client Sample iD Matrix Sampled Date/time Received Date/Time 0703140-01 GP-615 (0-1) Solid 03/05/07 08:41 03/06/07 15.30 0703140-02 GP-815 (1-2) Solid 03/05/07 08:42 03106/07 15:30 0703140-03 GP-B16 (0-1) Solid 03105/07 09:21 03/06/07 15:30 0703140-04 GP-e116(1-2) Solid 03/0510709:23 0310610715:30 0703140-05 GP-BI1(0-1) Solid 0310510709:45 0310610715:30 0703140-06 GP-617 (1-2) Solid 03/05/07 09:47 03/06/07 15:30 0703140-07 GP-819 (0-1) Solid 03/05/07 10:58 03/06/07 15:30 Thank you for the opportunity to serve your environmental chemistry analysis needs- If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our Customer Service Department at the phone number below. Respectfully submitted, �1• Kendall K. Brown President TRRP Rpr 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-MMl FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications 7- Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Ine P �•rt 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas:T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 2 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 14:23 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703140-01 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description Sam GP-1315 (0-1 ) le Date/Time P 03/05/07 0841 Analyte s) I Result SQL MOL Units ( F` I lost I Analvsis Batch Date/Time IAnlst� Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 97 0.01 0.01 % 1,00 7CO9034 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E And Digestion at SludgestSolids Completed NIA NIA NIA 4808 7CO9010 03109/071029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010E Copper 2.05 0.094 0.291 mgfkg dry 0.96 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1748 SPS Molybdenum 0.425 0-191 0.593 mglkg dry 0.96 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1748 SPS Nickel 4.10 0.152 0-471 mgntq dry 0.96 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1748 SPS Vanadium 6.00 0-055 0.169 mg*g dry 0.96 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1748 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.6-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-M1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 #'�► Environmental Laboratories State Certifications f* Bethany Tech Center - Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 n +'t 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 3 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN-. Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 14:23 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703140-02 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample i7escription GP-B15 (1-2) Sample Daterrime 03/05/07 0842 Analyte(s) Result I SQL I MQL i linits _ i F` tnst Batch Analysis I DatelTime JAnlst1 Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, EPA 9045C Corrosivity 10.7 0.1 0.1 pH Units 1.00 7CO9019 03/12/07 1300 HNR M-06 Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 95 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9034 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Acid Digestion of SludgeslSolids Completed NIA NIA NIA 48.08 7CO9010 03/09/07 1029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010E Copper 2.26 0.096 0.291 mglkg dry 0.96 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1752 SPS Molybdenum ND 0.196 0.593 mgllkq dry 0.96 M3 7C09010 03109/07 1752 SPS Nickel 4.67 0.156 0.471 mglkg dry 0.96 M3 7CO9010 03109/07 1752 SPS Vanadium 3.28 0.056 0.169 mgtkg dry 0_96 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1752 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v 2.5-111405 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-MMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 [nel�p 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma:8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 4 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project A. 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Trarnm Print DatefTime: 03/13/07 14:23 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Custonicr 0703140-03 Grab Solid Mike Franca Sample Description GP-616 (0-1) Sample DatefTime 03/05/07 0921 Analyte(s) Result SQL MQL Units fl ti Inst i Batch ysis AnAn lalysis Aalst I Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 96 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7C09035 03/09/07 1600 HNR exG Metals (Total), EPA 3050E And Digestion of Sludges/Solids Completed NIA NIA NIA 50.51 7C09010 03/09107 1029 SPS Metals (Totaq, EPA 60108 Copper 3.54 0.095 0.291 mglkg dry 1.01 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1756 SPS Molybdenum 22.7 0.195 0.593 mglkg dry 1.01 M3 7CO9010 03/09107 1756 SPS Nickel 13.7 0.155 0.471 mg/kg dry 1.01 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1756 SPS Vanadium 5.53 0.055 0.169 ,ng/kg dry 1.01 M3 7CO9010 03/09107 1756 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-1 f 14M Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228 RC41 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 pu 400 W. Bethany Rd. - Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 5 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 - ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Daterrime: 03/13/07 14:23 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Colfected By Customer 0703140-04 Grab Mike Franco Sample Description Solid GP-BI6 (1-2) Sample Daterlime 03/05107 0923 Analyte(s) Result SQL - J _ -MQL Units , F' 1 lost ( Batch I AAnalysis terrime 1Anlst Flag I Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254BG Solids 85 0.01 0.01 % 1_00 7CO9035 031091071600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Acid Digestion of SludgeslSolids Completed NIA NIA NIA 50.00 7CO9010 03/091071029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Copper 19.8 0.107 0.291 mg/kg dry 1.00 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1801 SPS Molybdenum 643 0.218 0.593 mglkg dry 1 00 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1801 SPS Nickel 146 0.173 0.471 mglkg dry 1.00 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1801 SPS Vanadium 10.7 0.062 0.169 mglkg dry 1.00 M3 7009010 03/09/07 1801 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 long Distance: (800) 228-EMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications T� Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 [n1o1E%;1apJ 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental page: Page 6 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 14:23 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703140-05 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description Sample DatelTime GP-617 (0-1) 03/05/07 0945 Analyte(s) Result SQL I MOL Units F" 1 Inst I Batch Analysis I DatelTime IAn1st Rag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 2540G % Solids 88 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7C09035 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Aad Dlgeslion of SludgesiSoRds Completed NIA NIA NIA 51.02 7CO9010 03/09/07 1029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 60105 Copper 8.73 0.104 0.291 Mg/kg dry 1.02 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1805 SPS Molybdenum 17-2 0.212 0.593 m91k9 dry 1.02 M3 7CO9010 03109/07 1805 SPS Nickel 9.21 0.168 0-471 mglkg dry 1.02 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1805 SPS Vanadium 14.5 0,060 0.169 ngikg dry 1.02 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1805 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-i i mm Local: (972) 727-1123 tong Distance: (8001 228-Ml FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications n a Bethany Tech Center Sanee 190 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 (gnlD 400 W. Bethany Rd_ • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas- E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page; Page 7 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Dateffime: 03/13107 14:23 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703140-06 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-B17 {1-2j Sample DateTme 03/05/07 0947 Analvsis Anaiytets) Result_ SQL I MQL r Units I F* I lust I Batch I _ batelTime lAnist_ -F1ag_ _ Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SIN 254OG % Solids 81 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9035 03/09107 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Add UgesGon of Sludges/Solids Completed NIA NIA NIA 49.50 7CO9010 03/09/07 1029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Gopper 11.6 0.113 0.291 mglkg dry 0.99 M3 7C09010 03109/07 1822 SPS Molybdenum 21-8 0.230 0.593 mg/kg dry 0_99 M3 7GO9010 03/09/07 1822 SPS Nickel 14.0 0.183 0.471 Mg/kg dry 0.99 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1822 SPS Vanadium 2T.5 0-066 0.169 mg/kg dry 0.99 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1822 SPS TRRP Rpl 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-E M1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Pip 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02001 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 8 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Datefrime: 03/13/07 14:23 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected Bar Customer 0703140-07 Grab Mike Franco Sample Description Solid GP-819 (0-1) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1058 Analyte(s) Result SQL MQL Units F' L Inst j ] Batchd _ Analysis Haterrime IAnlst Flag I Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 89 0.01 0.01 % 100 7CO9035 03/09107 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Aad Digestion of Sludges/So1Pds Completed NIA NIA N/A 49.50 7CO901 o 03109/07 1029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 60106 Copper 13.1 0.102 0.291 mglkg dry 0.99 M3 7GO9010 03/09/07 1826 SPS Molybdenum 12.7 0.208 0.593 mglkg dry 0.99 M3 7GO9010 03/09/07 1826 SPS Nickel 10.1 0.166 0-471 mglkg dry 0.99 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1826 SPS Vanadium 14.6 0.059 0.169 mglkg dry 0.99 M3 7CO9010 03/09107 1826 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v2-5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-EF3M1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications =ERM)' Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: 1104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 9 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Datef ime: 03/13/07 14.23 Conventional Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD lnits_l_ Level % REC I Limits RPD Limit I Flag Duplicate (7C09019-DUP1) Prepared & Analyzed- 03/12/07 13:00 Source: 0703140-02 Corrosively 10.8 0.1 PH Units 10.7 0.9 2 M-06 Reference (7C09019-SRM1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/12/07 13:00 Corrosivety 8.00 Blank (7C09034-BLKi ) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 16:00 % Solids ND 0.01 % Duplicate(7C09034-DUPi) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 16:00 Source: 0703112-01 % Solids 86 0.01 % 85 1 3.5 Blank (7C09035. 3LK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 16:00 % Solids ND 0.01 % Duplicate (7C09035-DUP1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 16:00 Source: 0703140-03 % Solids 98 0.01 % 96 2 3.5 M-06a TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ER(41 PAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Fne!qg 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 10 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 14:23 Metals (Total) - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD Analvta/s1 _ I Result I -SQ1 1 Ilnitc 1 Level Result %RECJ Limits RP❑ � Limit ! Flag Blank (7C09010-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Arid Digestion of SludgesrSoEids Completed NIA NIA Copper NO 0.091 mglkg wet Molybdenum NO 0.186 mgncg wet Nickel NO 0.148 m9*9 wet Vanadium NO 0.053 mg/kg wet Laboratory Control Sample (7C09010-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Acid Digestion ofSludgestsolids Completed NIA NIA 0-0 Copper 47.4 0.091 mgikgwet 50_p 95 86-106 Molybdenum 48.4 0.186 mgtkg wet 50.0 97 91-111 Nickel 43.7 0A48 m9fk9wet 50-0 87 82-109 Vanadium 48.8 0.053 mgikgwet 50,0 98 75-125 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C09010-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09107 10:29 Add Digestion of Sludges/Solids Completed NIA NIA 0-0 0 Copper 46.8 0.091 m9/k9 wet 50.0 94 86-106 1 5 Molybdenum 48.3 0.186 m9fk9wet 50.0 97 91-111 0.2 7 Nickel 43.5 0.148 fng*g wet 50.0 87 82-109 0.5 5 Vanadium 48.1 0.053 --._ m9fk9wet 50-0 96 75-125 1 20 Matrix Spike (7c09010-MS1) — Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Source: 0703112-03 Add Digestion of SludgestSolids Completed NIA N/A NO 0-0 Copper 74.4 0.111 m9fk9 dry 60.4 25.2 81 75-125 Molybdenum 47.3 0,227 m91k9 dry 60.4 ND 78 75-124 Nickel 67.8 0.180 m9fkg dry 60.4 21.2 77 75-116 Vanadium 109 0.065 mg" dry 60.4 45.7 105 75-125 TRRP Rpf 5 - v 2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State CerliffcaGorns Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Lnelap 400 W. Bethany lid. • Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas:T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 11 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 14:23 Metals (Total) - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD JlnalvtPts] Rasnit__ `.SQI ___ tinim Level Result_ - %REC Limits RPD Limit i Flag Matrix Spike (7009010-MS2) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Source: 0703124-01 Add Digestion of SludgeslSofids Completed NIA NIA ND 0-0 Copper 2850 5.17 mg/kg dry 2790 319 91 75-125 Molybdenum 2510 10.6 m9(k9 dry 2790 ND 90 75-124 Nickel 2310 8A1 m9-9drY 2790 16.9 62 75-116 Vanadium 2510 3.01 mglkg dry 2790 6.19 90 75-125 Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C09010-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Source: 0703112-03 Acid Digestion of SWdges/Solids Completed NIA NIA NO 0-0 0 Capper $2.9 0.111 m9fk9 dry 59.2 25.2 97 75-125 11 15 Molybdenum 54-5 0.227 mglkg dry 59.2 ND 92 75-124 14 18 Nickel 81.7 0.180 mglkgdry 59.2 21.2 102 75-116 19 18 Q-04 Vanadium 128 0.065 mg" dry 59.2 45.7 139 75-125 V 16 20 Q-02,Q-14 Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C09010-MSD2) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Source: 0703124-01 Adtl Digestion of SludgesfSolids Completed NIA NIA NO 0-0 0 Copper 2730 5.17 mgrkg dry 2790 319 86 75-125 4 15 Molybdenum 2500 10.6 m9&9 dry 2790 ND 90 75-124 0.4 18 Nickel 2290 8.41 mgfkg drY 2790 16.9 81 75-116 0.9 18 Vanadium 2480 3.01 mgfk9 drY 2790 6.19 89 75-125 1 20 TRRP Rpt 5 - v 2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228- RM1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 12 of 12 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 14:23 Notes and Definitions The results presented in this report were generated using those methods given in 40 CFR Part 136 for Water and Wastewater samples and in SW-846 for RCRA/Solid Waste samples. J This value is above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit. M-06 pH was measured at 22.1"C. M-06a pH was measured at 22°C. Q-02 The recovery of an analyte(s) in the MSs was outside the acceptable range due to interference, large dilutions required for analysis or a combination of these factors. The recovery of this analyte(s) in the LCSs was within the required limits. Q-04 The RPD of the target analyte(s) in the MSIMSD is outside of established limits. The RPD of this same analyte(s) in the LCS/LCSD is within acceptable limits. Therefore, the data were reported and are acceptable. Q-14 The recovery was higher than expected- This may indicate a high bias to results presented. NO Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis LCSILCSD Laboratory Control Sample/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD Relative Percent Difference mglkg milligrams per kilogram mg/I milligrams per liter ug/kg micrograms per kilogram ug/l micrograms per liter exc Not covered under scope of NELAP accreditation- F` Calculated factor rounded to 3 significant figures. Concentration factor when <1.00 and dilution factor when >1-00- Inst Instrument Identification Anist Analyst Initials SQL Sample Quantitation Limit MQL Method Quantitation Limit rRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 2281 FAX: (972) 727-1175 ERMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Data Package Cover Page This data package for Laboratory Job Number 0703140 consists of: Q This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data: Q R1 Field chain -of -custody documentation; ✓ R2 Sample identification cross-reference; ✓ R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes: a) Items consistent with NELAC 5.13 or ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5-10 b) dilution factors, c) preparation methods, d) cleanup methods, and e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs). Q R4 Surrogate recovery data including: a) Calculated recovery (IM), and b) The laboratory's surrogate QC limits- e✓ R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples; R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including: a) LCS spiking amounts, b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and c) The laboratory's LCS QC limits- �✓ R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including: a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified, b) MS/MSD spiking amounts, c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples, d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and o) The laboratory's MS/MSD QC limits ❑✓ R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision: a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate, b) the calculated RPD, and c) the laboratory's QC limits for analytical duplicates. eR9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix; Rio Other problems or anomalies. Q The Exception Report for every "No" or "Not Reviewed (NR)" item in laboratory review checklist. Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by the laboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached exception reports. By my signature below, 1 affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratory in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data. Check, if applicable: [ [ This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person responding to rule. The official signing the cover page of the rule -required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release statement is true. Kendall K. Brown 4 " President Name (Printed) Signature Official Title (Printed) 03/13/07 Date LRC.Rpt-1001.0-1.1 Page 1 or4 Q.Torm MasrerslLRC.Rpt ERMI Environmentat Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: Elft Environmental Laboratories LRC Date: 0303107 Pra'oct Name: Cytec Laborato Job Number: 0703140 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc Prep Batch Number(s): 7C09010,7C090i9,7C09034,7C09035 ER#' 19 I:- - of Chair-ni-cualxMy JC-p`Cj Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? ! I r7 a7 Sarnnde and an.eilh. �,�o,nt r�rt Yyi,�.nrrr,,,:.,., Are a[I field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? T� X Are all laboratory ID numbers crass -referenced to the corresponding QC data? X Ira .01 T"I'n*mrL*tO Were atf samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? X Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? X Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? X Were all anafyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? X Were sample quantitation limits reported for all anarytes not detected? X Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? X Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? X If required for the project, TiCs reported? �X Were surrogates added prior to extraction? X Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC limits?+fit �L -y, R� ❑I t'0gtM9 n+1.3iM!15515Lj9Vtunrl9N-rbls,ak:osmplr:7 Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? x Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, it applicable, cleanup procedures? X Were blank concentrations < MOL? X Were all COCs. included in the LCS? X Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? X Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? X Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) q Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? X Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? X Were the project(method specified analytes included in the MS and MSD? X Were MSIMSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X Were MS (and MSD, if applicabfe) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X i=001 Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? —J X loop }z. Rr� Qt tAnpl I,•nl dupileata'¢afa Were appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? X Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X Weref iP Ds or relative standard deviations within the laboratory OC limits? Ei9 '--1,1_n�rt.��rr1(blt�tJ�.. - -r __ „�• Are the MQL.s for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? X X - Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? X Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? X F 10 Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LAC and ER? X Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? X Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL to minimize the matrix interference affects on the sam to results? X ._ ......�...�a....,...�..... ...�.e.....o r wi.a.,ey..:,.w���xv+...uw,nnrYequnea,ePunlsl-hems Aen[meo vY meteaer 3'snould be celaa,ed and made a�aAable upon .egoest farthe appiapdale reten[ion Period. 2. n o(ganb a�ratyses; r = inorganica,ayses (and several wem�wy, ud,en appricablek 2. NA - Not appt-bl- 4. MR = Nat reviewed; LRC Rpt-1001.0-1.1 Page 2 of 4 ER 11 Q.-ti-onm MastefNV-RC.Rpt 5. ERN = Exception Report identification number (an E-epl'wn Repon should be c—pletedforan Rem el'NFr ar "No is checked). ERMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: F. 41 Environmental Laboratories LRC Date: 03/13/07 Project Name: Cylec Laboratory Job 0703140 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc prep Batch Number(s): 7CO9010,7CO9019,7C09034,7CO9035 #' Ar I Description _ Yes I No I NA' I NR' ERff4 �:?S1 • .Uilnr�1ll�!Wl+i��{�4 , � ,4_ _:� .. � Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyze within OC limits? _ X ___ Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? X Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analyses? X Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate the curve? X Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? X Has the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? — X ;S�' : QI � �nlf�gE nryd eofrlfrlf!Irty:pmjlh{nitigtt �eli�4eHgn [[p�;,r oPd.C,irV} and rantlnufpp c8llfrrotlor+ - — -- . Was the CCV analyzed at the method -required frequency? X Were percent differences for each analyte within the method -required QC limits? X Was the [CAL curve verified for each analyte? X Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB < MDL? X 93 O 14f.8sBapCCt�'dLlLlllifig- ." ��,f:i ` '•'�-_ rr' ` Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning? X Were ion abundance data within the method -required QC limits? X Were ES area counts and retention times within the method -required QC limits? X J $117w�e`(NEiACpecilon. lappa Were the raw data (for example, chromatograms, spectral data) reviewed by an analyst? X Were data associated with manual integrations flagged on the raw data? X so: :a isg�lufnn flora lloP Did dual column confirmation results meet the method -required QC? X �? :O � a1Gx4Cj'JrMarh4�rloIAP'aurr4�{>1Gyk ' _: If TICS were requested, were she mass spectra and TIC data subject to appropriate checks? X I - SFI I ,Y�ygrlfioi�Cl.(rikS�mpfa�IC3jlreau_kta�.. _ _ _ Were percent recoveries within method QC limits? _ X . Sfl 'I � $�l!Itrl d�.jull,a114 p'agl rHgcutigrq rrE11tM� ltrFp nldlilnA.a(;tirwllvdadri�llolp " Were percent differences, recoveries, and the tinearity within the QC Clmits specified in the metimd? X] 1 Was a MDL study performed for each reported analyte? X Is the MDL either adjusted or supported by the analysis of pCSs? X 9*1 *RiRficlrncy lsa! riy►oAs Was the laboratory's performance acceptable on the applicable profidency tests or evaluation studies? .i�' Ilerd3 rtocuJr(hrlletiun . Are all standards used in the analyses NEST -traceable or obtained from other appropriate sources? I X—T - — 8f3":',I,' '' pvuiadlU�ilkLoJi4acd0.e4(Iwi�protatxl5ls+? ';.g: "_ -,, r,• Are the procedures for compound(analyte identification documonted? X d CI 141IEtla dlt aY 6Lelyttt cariipet6oq (D4C) Was DOC oonduded consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or tSOAEC 4? X Is documentation of the analyst's competency up -to -dale and on hie? X 151 Jj151 VOFff ou4fu +rll�lniiorl d urfl� mtaticxi fa(NO: r, {;Iiop 5 w i i CC 17075 Sc rtlan aj -- Are all the methods used t0 generate the data docunwoted, verified, and validated, where applicable? X r 'L6r AQl_y1.b.Lh)istoryrdlrndilhl0o>.iteflllgproe1�41uree(SORro), . Are laboratory SOPS current and on file for each method performed? [ items ItlnrliFled hyfie Idler "H'musl 6a ncluded irr the laboratory data package aubnrRled In the TRRP-,equrred report(st-Runs rden[ified hythe le[ter'S'should be retained ard made mailable upon requesl for trra appropriate rereralon Period. 2. O = arrii—Ic anary N t =i—W rtie aralysec (amf general Ihmrdshry, when appurable); 3. M - Not appl-bl% J. NR - Nor reviewed; 5. ERY = Exoep&at Report identification number (an Ex Vp m Report stwuld be completed for m item If'NR' o WO' is checked). LRC.Rpt-100 f.0-f. f Page 3 of 4 ,1 I[il pq Q:IForrn hfastersV RC.Rpt EMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Exception Reports Laboratory Name: ERMI Environmental Laboratories LRC Date: 03113f07 Project Name: Cytec Laboratory Job 0703140 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc Prep Batch Number(s): 7C09010,7C09019,7C09034,7C09035 EWO ` Description E(m I Matrix Spike Recovery for Vanadium (139%) was outside acceptance limits (75-125) in 7CO9010-MfSD1 for V Total 1CP 60108 - The recovery of an analyte(s) in the Ws was outside the acceptable range due to interference, largo dilutions required for analysis or a combination of these factors. The recovery of this analyte(s) in the LCSs was within the required limits. - The recovery was higher thane cted. This may indicate a high bias to results presented. E002 Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD for Nickel (19%) was above the acceptance limit (48) in 7CO9010-MSDI for Ni Total ICP 6010B - The RPD of the target analyte(s) in the MS/MSD is outside of established limits. The RPD of this same analyte(s) in the LCS/LCSD is within acceptable limits. Therefore, the data were reported and are acceptable. I. LRN = V—plian Repan klertmw- tian nwifw (an Exception Report shouk] be completed Torah rte A WFV or 146"is die kedon the LRC) LRC.Rpt-1001.0-1.1 Page 4 of �� (I - DI) Q:11 a w MastersV-RC.Rpt cu rn c0 d IL Lon, 0o f`- qzzr T- A CV m N N w Z m a) 0) ai CT) r— V-i CF) V-i cm A, �AI cn 0s CO Q i IL .as M .+, Lab-Numbegs): () 7 D 3100 ERMI Sample Preservation Documentation - On Ice (Circle One(: YES R NO (check if on Dry Parameters Containers Required Preservation Sample Circle pH 9 Size Con , iner Note anv discr anc Metals pH < 2 Glass or pH < 2 Plastic Dissolved #',petals Unpreserved prior to being Glass or filtered, Cool 4" C Plastic Glass only Senilvolattles, Cool 4" C Pesticides, PCBs, with Teflon lid Chlorine Clyes lino Herbicides VOA (9TE), Cool 4' C, pH < 2 40 ml VOA vial UTBE, 624, 8260; Zero Head Space TPH-GRO 40 mi VOA vial VOA Cool 4' C; (TPH-1005) Zero Head Space Please check if collected In re-wei hed vials Glass or PH < 2 Phos_, NOA02i NH,N, Coo, Cool 40 C, pH < 2 Plastic TKNJOC TD$, 800, Cool 4° C Glass or COOD, Cond, PH, Plastic, Plastic TSSr F, So„ Ct'", only if F CI Alk, Sulfite Glass only Phertols; TPH-IRO Cool 41 C, pH < 2 Teflon lid Foil lid Oil & Grease, Glass only TPH (by 16644) Cool 4' C, pH < 2 Teflon lid Foil lid Glass or pH > 12 Cyanide Cool 4' C, pH >12 Plastic Chlorine Oyes Ono Sulfl le oyes ono tina Srilfide Cool 40 C, pH > 9 Glass or PH.>; 9 i = Baawla . Cool 4° C Stedie Cup Soil, lodge, VO Coal 4' C Note: please check -if Oil, liquid collected in pre -welshed ar Waf - COfYb1+IEtM- ors blroKi r, t, rk ;-mA s� *This foam -is used to document sample preservation. Circle parameter requested. Fill I" number and size of containers received. Check pH (adjust if needed) and note if different ftom what is required and make a notation of any samples not received on ice. Note any incorrect sample con(ainers or preservation on chain - of -:custody. fa VO :Preservation Checked By c 3-7-07 ` Date r�me kdy 1006 1000.a3 * Q:1Fmm Masters% Sample Presewafion Fban 1000 a-3 Environmental Laboratories Slate Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 [nelap] �•r� 400 W. Bethany Rd. Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Shaw Environmental 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Report of Sample Analysis Page: Page 1 of 47 Project: Cytec Project #: 124883 Print Date/Time: 03/13107 16:22 Attached is our analytical report for the samples received for your project. Below is a list of your individual sample descriptions with our corresponding laboratory number. We also have enclosed a copy of the Chain of Custody that was received with your samples and a form documenting the condition of your samples upon arrival. Please note any unused portion of the samples may be discarded upon expiration of the EPA holding time for the analysis performed or after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise. €RMI Environmental laboratories certifies that all results contained in this report were produced in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) unless otherwise noted. The results presented apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain -of -custody document(s) furnished with the samples. This report is intended for the sole use of the customer for whom the work was performed and must be reproduced, without modification, in its entirety - Sample Identification Laboratory ID 9 Client Sample ID Matrix Sampled DatelTime Received DatelTime 0703141-01 GP-1318 (0-1) Solid 03/05/07 11:45 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-02 GP-1318 (1-2) Solid 03/05/07 11:47 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-03 GP-1320 (0-1) Solid 03/05/07 10:27 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-04 GP-020 (2-3) Solid 03/05/07 10:34 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-05 GP-1320 (7-8) Solid 03105/07 10:45 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-06 GP-1320 (8-9) Solid 03/05/07 10-48 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-07 GP-B20 (10-11) Solid 03/05/07 10:52 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-08 GP-1321 (0-1) Solid 03105107 11:55 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-09 GP--021 (2-3) Solid 03/05/07 12:02 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-10 GP-B21 (3-4) Solid 03/05/07 12:03 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-11 GP-821 (6-7) Solid 03/05/07 12:05 03106/07 15:30 0703141-12 GP-B22 (0-1) Solid 03/05/07 11:20 03/06/07 15:30 0703141-13 GP-822 (2-3) Solid 03/05/07 11:23 03/06/07 15:30 TRRP Rpt 5 - v_2.5-r 11406 Local: (972) 727-1123 - Long Distance: (800) 228-€RMI PAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Vielap) Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas. 88-0647 ���•••+++��� 400 W. BethanyRd_ • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma- 8727 Louisiana' 02007 Kansas- E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page; Page 2 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 750153 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Dateffime: 03/13/07 16:22 Thank you for the opportunity to serve your environmental chemistry analysis needs. If you have any questions or - concerns regarding this report please contact our Customer Service department at the phone number below. Respectfully submitted, 4rreL��"r. ' Z, Kendall K. Brown President TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center * Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. + Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma- 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page_ Page 3 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID M Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected. By. Custanler 0703141-01 Grab Solid Mike Franco I Sample Description GP-818 {0-1) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1145 Analvsis Analyte(s I Result SQL MQL Units ` FI Inst I Batch Date/Time IAnlst I Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 78 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7C09035 03/09/07 1600 HNR exe Metals (Total), EPA 30506 Add Digestion of SludgeslSofids Completed NIA NIA MIA 49.02 7CO9010 03/09/07 1029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010E Copper 10.3 0-117 0-291 mg/kg dry 0.98 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1838 SPS Molybdenum 6.91 0.238 0.593 mg/kg dry 0.98 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1838 SPS Nickel 7.85 0.190 0.471 mgfkg dry 0-98 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1838 SPS Vanadium 15.0 0.068 0.169 mglkg dry 0.98 M3 7C09010 03/09f07 1838 SPS 7RRP Rpf 5 - v.2.50 11406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications 11 Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 'I elap 400 w_ Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 4 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 tmmaboratory iD #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-02 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-1318 (1-2) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1147 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SQL M4L Units F` I last I Batch I Daiefl ime _JAnist I Flag I Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 2540G % Solids 86 0.01 0.G1 % 1.00 7C09035 03109/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 30508 Add DgesGon of SludgeslSolids Completed NIA NIA N/A 50.51 7C09010 03/09/07 1029 SPS Metals (Totat), EPA 60106 Copper 9.95 0.106 0.291 mg/kg dry 1.01 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1843 SPS Molybdenum 5.57 0.217 0.593 mgJkg dry 1,01 M3 7G09010 03/09/07 1843 SPS Nickef 8.38 0.173 0.471 mgfkg dry 1 01 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1843 SPS Vanadium 15.4 0.062 0.169 mglkg dry 1.01 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1843 SPS TRRP Rpr 5 - v.2.5-111405 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 2284MM1 PAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center * Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 a Dl 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Okiahoma: 8727 Louisiana_ 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 5 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN. Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected_ 13 Customer 0703141-03 Grab Mike Franco Sample Description Solid GP-820 (0-1) Sample DatelTime 03/05/07 1027 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SQL MQL Units 1 F• I inst I Batch i DatelTime lAnist I Flag J Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 87 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7C09035 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Acid Digeslion of SludgeslSolids Completed NIA NIA N/A 48.54 7CO9010 03/09/07 1029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Copper 17.5 0.104 0.291 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7009010 03/09107 1847 SPS Molybdenum 4.35 0.213 0.593 mg/kg dry 0.97 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1847 SPS Nickel 13.9 0.169 0.471 mg/kg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1847 SPS Vanadium 21.9 0.061 0.169 mgn<g dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1847 SPS TRRP W 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-Ei ] FAX: (972) 727-1176 Environmental Laboratories Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Shaw Environmental 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Laboratory Id #: Sample Type 0703141-04 Grab Sample Descri lion GP-B20 (2-3) State Certifications Arkansas: 88-0647 (n Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Page: Page 6 of 47 Project: Cytec Project #: 124883 Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Matrix Sample Collected By Customer Solid Mike Franco Sample Daterrime 03/05/07 1034 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SQL MOL _ Units I F' ( Inst I Batch IOatelrime 1An1st Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 87 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9035 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Acid Digestion of SludgeslSolids Completed NIA NIA NIA 46.54 7CO9010 03/09/07 1029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010E Copper 10.2 0.105 0.291 mg/kg dry 0A7 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1851 SPS Molybdenum 2.39 0.214 0.593 m9Acg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1851 SPS Nickel 7-45 0.171 0.471 tnglkg dry 0.91 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1851 SPS Vanadium 14.2 0.061 0.169 mg/kg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09107 1851 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-1 r 1406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06--fX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 7 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory. ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By er 0703141-05 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-620 (7-8) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1045 Analyte(s) Result SQL MQL Units I F` I Inst J Batch Analysis I Daterrime lAnist Flag_ Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 86 0.01 0.01 % 100 7CO9035 03/09/07 1600 t-1NR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Acid DigesGono(Sludges/Sokds completed NIA N/A N/A 48-54 7CO9010 03109/071029 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Arsenic 5.27 1.06 2.89 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Barium 42.0 0.058 0,159 mg/kg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Cadmium NO 0.051 0.141 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7009010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Chromium 10.6 0.081 0.220 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Copper 8.99 0.106 0.291 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Lead 95.2 0.272 0.741 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03109/07 1855 SPS Molybdenum 11-7 0.217 0.593 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Nickel 8.89 0A73 0:471 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7C09010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Selenium NO 0.889 2.42 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Silver NO 0.235 0.638 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03109/07 1855 SPS Vanadium 14.7 0.062 0.169 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7CO9010 03/09/07 1855 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 7471A Mercury 0.06104 0,00077 0.00375 mglkg dry 1.03 M1 7C12009 03/12/07 1525 SDS TRRP Rpt 5 - v 2.5411406 Local: (972) 727-1123 long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications n Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 C; vi 400 W. Bethany Rd- • Aiten, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: F-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 8 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 1622 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected 81 Customer 0703141-06 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-B20 (8-9) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1048 Analysis Analyte(s) Result I SQL I MQL J Units I F` Inst Satch batelTime JAnlst I Flag I TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Lang Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications n ce a Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Pi 400 W. Bethany Rd. + Allen, Texas 7-9013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: P-10288 Texas:T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 9 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN_ Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-06 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-620 (8-9) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1048 Analyte(s) Result SQL I MQL I Units F* � �_Inst � Batch Analysis I DatelTime lAnIst � Flag I Volatile Organics, EPA 8260E Benzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Bromobenzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Bromochloromethane NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03108/07 2343 ZT Bromodichloromethane NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT eramoform (Tribromomethanel ND 3.14 3.00 uglkg dry 1 a0 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Bromomethane (Methyl eramide) NO 3.14 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03108/07 2343 ZT n-Butylbenzene NO 3.14 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT sec-Butylbenzene NO 3.14 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT ter)-Butylbenzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Carbon Tetrachloride NO 2.52 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT Chlorobenzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) NO 3.77 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Chloroform NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry I AM V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride) NO 3.14 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 2-Chlorotoluene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 4-Chlorotoluene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03MI07 2343 ZT Dibromochloromethane ND 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7009030 03/08/07 2343 ZT (Chiorodibramo-) 1.241bmmo3-chloropropane NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry IM V3 7C09030 03/08107 2343 ZT (DBCP) 1,24Oibromoethane (Ethylene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1 Ao V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO 2.52 3A0 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT 1,3-Dichiorobenzene NO 3.14 3.00 ugikg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT IA-Dichlorobenzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03108/07 2343 ZT DichlorodiOuoromethane NO 3.14 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT t,1-Dichloroothane NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT 1,2-0ich(oraethano (Ethylene NO 3.14 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/408/07 2343 ZT Dichiodde) 1.1-11ichloroelhene (Vnylidene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Chloride) cis-12-Dichloroethene NO 3.14 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03108/07 2343 ZT trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT MRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-MI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications gPg, 1 Bethany Tech Center * Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W- BethanyRd. 4 Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 *r Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: page 10 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sam to Collected By Customer 0703141-06 Grab Sample Description Solid Mike Franco GP-B20 (8-9) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1048 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SQL MQL r Ur is F* l _ Inst I Batch I DatefTirne Artist Flag I Volatile Organics, EPA 8260B (continued) 1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene NO 3,14 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT Dichloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1 00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 2,2-Dichloropropane NO 2.52 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08107 2343 ZT 1,1-Dichloropropene NO 114 3.00 uglkgdry -00 V3 7C09030 0310=72343 ZT Ethyl Benzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03108f07 2343 ZT Hexachlorobutadiene No 3.14 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT lsopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO 2.52 3.00 rig/kg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03f08107 2343 ZT p-Isopropyltoluene NO 3.14 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Methyl led butyl ether (MTBE) NO 3.77 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Methylene Bromide NO 3-14 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03108/07 2343 ZT (Dibromomethane) Methylene Chloride NO 3.77 3-00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08107 2343 ZT (Dichforomethane) Naphthalene NO 3.14 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT n-Propylbenzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Styrene NO 2-52 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 1,1,1,2-Tetradtloroethane NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT 1.1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 3.14 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Tetrachlomethene NO 3A4 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT (Pe"foroefhylene) Toluene NO 2.52 3-00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 1,2,3-Trtchlorobenzene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO 2.52 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 1.1.1-Tric hloroetharte (Methyl NO 2.52 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Chloroform) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT Tnchlomothene NO 3.14 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT (Trichlomethylene) Trichlorot>uoromethane NO 2.52 5.00 uglkg dry 1-00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO 3.77 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NO 2,52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 ZT 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NO 2.52 3.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 ZT rRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-€ i FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications (00 Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W_ Bethany Rd. + Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana:02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas- T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 11 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #. 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13107 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Custoreer 0103141-06 Grab Said Mike Ffanco Sample Description GP-1320 (8-9) Sample Date/Time 03/051071048 Antes) Result SQL MQQL Units P I I.St I Batch I Analysis Datel-rime JA.Nt Flag Volatile Organics, EPA 8260B (continued) Vinyl Chloride NO 1.89 2.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT m-,p-Xylene NO 4.40 6.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 ZT o-Xylene NO 2.52 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03108/07 2343 ZT Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98 % 90-108 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08/07 2343 Surrogate: 4-13romoiluoroben7ene 97 % 90.114 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/08107 2343 Surrogate: 1,2-0ichloroethane-d4 80 % 71-134 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/08/07 2343 Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 79 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9036 03/09/07 1600 HNR exe Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Add Digestion of SEudgesfSOGds Completed MIA NIA N/A 50.00 7C12001 03/12/07 0915 SDS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Copper 9.87 0.114 0.291 mglkg dry 1.00 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1250 SPS Molybdenum 8-84 0.234 0.593 mgtkg dry 1.00 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1250 SPS Nickel 14.4 0.186 0.471 mglkg dry 1,00 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1250 SPS Vanadium 28.1 0.067 0.169 mgtkg dry 1 n0 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1250 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111405 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-t~RMl FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications F . Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas:E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 12 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 1622 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-07 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-B20 (10-11 ) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1052 I 1 Analysis Analyte(s} I Result I SQL MQL Units P I lost I Batch1 _ DatelTime _ AAnist I Flag TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-1 I N06 Local: 1972j 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 2284MM1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center 4 Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Lnela 400 W. Bethany Rd. 4 Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104104232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 13 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project_ 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatetTime_ 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID M Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Custorner 0703141-07 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-620 (10-11) Sample QatelTime 03/05/07 1052 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SQL MQi, Units F` Inst I Batch I Date/Time iAnist I Flag Volatile Organics, EPA 8260E Benzene ND 2.56 3-00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT aromobenzene ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry I V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Sromochloromelhane ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Bromodichloromethane ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Bromoiorm (Tdluomomethane) ND 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Bremomethane (Methyl Bromide) ND 320 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 031091010015 ZT n-Butylbenzene ND 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT sec-Bulylbenzene ND 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT tert-Bulylbenzene ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Carbon Tetrachloride ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0015 ZT Chiorobenzene ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0015 ZT Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) ND 3.84 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Chloroform ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Chlommethane (Methyl Chloride) ND 3.20 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0015 ZT 2-Chlorotoluene NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0015 ZT 4-Chlorotoluene NO 2-56 3.00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT nibromochloromelharte NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT (Chlorodibromo...) 1 2-Dibramo-3-chtomprapane ND 2-56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03fO9107 0015 ZT (DBCP) 1,2-131b[nmoethane (Ethylene ND 2-56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03109/07 0015 ZT Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.56 3.00 uglkgdry 1.00 V3 7009030 031091070015 ZT 1,3-Dichlofobenzene ND 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Dichlorodi(luoromethane ND 3.20 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 2.56 3.00 uglkgdry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03109/070015 ZT 1.2-0ichloroethane (Ethylene ND 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Dichloride) t, 1 Qidrloroethene (Vinylidene ND 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry t00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0015 ZT Chloride) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 031091070015 ZT trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene NO 2,56 3.00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1-RRP Rpr 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-Ml FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Lnei�p 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 14 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time., 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-07 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description Sample Datel GP-620 (10-11) Time 03/05/07 1052 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SQL M�Qi Units l_ F` I Inst I Batch ( Daterrime IAnlst Flag I Volatile Organics, EPA 8260E (continued) 1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene NO 3,20 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Dichloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 2,2-Dichloropropane NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 3,20 3,00 uglkgdry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/070015 ZT Ethyl Benzene NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09107 0015 ZT Flexachlorobutadiene NO 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0015 ZT 1s propylbenzene (Cumene) NO 2.56 3.00 ug/kg dry 1,00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT p-Isopropyltoluene NO 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Methyl tort butyl ether (MTBE) NO 3.84 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Methytene Bromide NO 3-20 3-00 ugtkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT (Dibromomethana) Methylene Chloride NO 3-84 3.00 ugtkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT (D'rchloromethane) Naphthalene NO 3.20 3-00 uglkgdry 1.00 V3 7C49030 031091070015 ZT n-Propylbenzene NO 2.56 3-00 uglkg dty 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Styrene NO 2-56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,1,1,2-Telrachloroethane NO 2-56 3.00 uglkg dry Loo V3 7CO9030 031091070015 ZT 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 3.20 3.00 uglkg dry 1.09 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Tetrachlomethene NO 3,20 3,00 ugft dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT (Perchloroethylene) Toluene NO 2.56 3.00 ugtkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO 2.56 3.00 ugtkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1.1,1-Trichloroethane {Methyl NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1-00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT chloramm) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT Tiichtoroethene NO 3-20 3.00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT (Trichloroethylene) Trichlorofluoromelhane NO 2.56 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO 3.84 3.00 uglkg dry 1_o0 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,2.4-Trimethylbenzene NO 2.56 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NO 2.56 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0015 ZT TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-EittMl FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications n � Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas- 88-0647 it 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana. 02007 Kansas:E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 15 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project M 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime_ 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Tye Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-07 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-620 (10-11) Sample Oate(Cime 03/05/07 1052 Anal te(sj Result SQL MQL units F` I inst I batch Analysis { baterrime �Anlst ! FIa9 I Volatile Organics, EPA 82606 (continued) Vinyl Chloride NO 1.92 2.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0015 ZT m-,p-Xylene No 4.48 6.00 uglkg dry 1 00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 ZT o-Xylene NO 2.56 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0015 ZT Surrogate. Toluene-d8 98 % 90-108 1-04 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 Surrogate: 4-Sromofluorobenzene 98 % 90-114 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0015 Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 81 % 71-134 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0015 Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 78 0.01 0.01 % 1 u0 7CO9036 03/09107 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Add Digoslim of Sludges/Solids Completed NIA NlA NIA 50-00 7C12001 03/12/07 0915 SIDS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Copper 8.89 0.117 0.291 mg/kg dry IAA M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1255 SPS Molybdenum 2.42 0.238 0.593 mglkg dry 1.00 M3 7C12001 03112/07 1255 SPS Nickel 12Z 0.190 0.471 mg/kg dry 1.0o M3 7C12001 03112/07 1255 SPS Vanadium 31.8 0.068 0-169 mg/kg dry 1.00 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1255 SPS TRRP Rp15 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-F. I FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 400 W. Bethany Rd- • Allen, Texas 75013 Shaw Environmental 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Laboratory ID #: Sample Type 0703141-08 Grab Sample Description GP-B21 (0-1) State Certifications �� _ Arkansas- 88-0647 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Page: Page 16 of 47 Project: Cytec Project ##: 124883 Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16.22 Matrix Sample Collected By Customer Solid Mike Franco Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1155 { SQL MQL Units Anaiysis Analyte(s) Result �_ F" � fnst � Batch I L7atelFime IAnlsk Fiag rRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local- (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERM1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas_ 88-0647 Ln e I a 400 W, Bethany Rd. + Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8127 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas- T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 17 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 1622 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-08 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-821 (0-1) Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 1155 Analysis Analyte{s) Result SQL MQL I Units F` Inst I Batch I Datefrirne IAnlst I Flag Volatile Organics, EPA 8260E Benzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Bromobenzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Bromochloromelhane NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Bramodichloromethane NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Bromororm (Tribromomelhane) NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) NO 2.89 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT n-Butylbenzene NO 2.89 3.00 ug/kg dry 10o V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT sec-Butylbenzene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09107 0046 ZT tent-Butylbenzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Carbon Tetrachloride NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0046 ZT Chlorobonzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0046 ZT Chloroethene (Ethyl Chloride) NO 3.47 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Chloroform NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Chloromothana (Methyl Chloride) NO 2,89 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 2-Chlorotoluene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 4-Chlorotoluene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Dibromochloromethane NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0046 ZT (Chlorodibromo...) 1,2-Dibromo3-chloropropane ND 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT peep) 1,2-Dihromoethane (Ethylene NO 2-31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0046 ZT Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0046 ZT 1,3-Dichloroberizene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkgdry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1,4-Dichtorobenzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Dichlorodifluoromethane NO 2.89 5.00 uglkg dry 1 A0 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 2-31 3.00 uglkg dry Ieo V3 7CO9030 031091070046 ZT 1,2-0ichloroethane (Ethylene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0046 ZT Dlchlorido) 1,1-Dichlaroethene(Ynylidene NO 2.31 3.00 ug/kg dry 1-00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Chloride) as-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 2.89 3.00 ug/kg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03109/07 0046 ZT TRRP Rpt 5 - v 2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications R: M Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 [nelap 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texan T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental page: Page 18 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Cl>stomer 0703141-08 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-B21 (0-1 ) Sample DatelTime 03/05/07 1155 Analysis Analytess} Result SQL MQL I Units P Inst I Batch i DatelTime Anlst Flag Volatile Organics, EPA 8260B (continued) 1,2-6ic4loropropane (Propylene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0046 ZT Dichtodde) 1,3-Dichloropropane NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 2,2-Dichloropropane NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1,1-Dichloropropene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Ethyl Benzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7C09030 03109/07 0046 ZT Hexachlorobuladiene NO 2.89 3.00 u91k9 dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Isopropylbenzene (Cumenel NO 2,31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT p-Isopropyltoluene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Methyl tort butyl ether (MTBE) NO 3.47 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Methylene Bromide NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT (Dibromomethane) Methylene Chloride NO 3.47 3.00 ugAg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT (Dichloromethane) Naphthalene NO 2.89 300 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0046 ZT n-Propylbenzene NO 2.31 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Styrene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1.1,1,2-Tetrachloroelhane ND 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09107 0046 ZT 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 2.89 3.00 ug/kg dry 1.0a V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0046 ZT Tetrachloroethene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 1 Ao V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT {Perchloroethylene) Toluene NO 2.31 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1,2,4-Trichloroben7-ene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1.1,1-Tdchloroethane (Methyl NO 2.31 3-00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7C09030 03109/07 0046 ZT Chloroform) 1.1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Trichloroethene NO 2.89 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0046 ZT (Trichloroelhylene) Trichlorofluoromethane NO 2.31 5.00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 12,3-Trichioropropane NO 3.47 3.00 uglkg dry 1-00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT 1,3,5-Trimethyibenzone NO 2.31 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7C09030 03109/07 0046 ZT TRRP Rpt 5 - v-2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-EMI PAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental laboratories Slate Certifications [neIV Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 19 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project M 124883 ATTN_ Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16.22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Costumer 0703141-06 Grab Mike Franco Sample Description Solid GP-021 (0-1) Sample Daterrime 03/05/07 1155 Analyte(s) Result ! SOL I MOL Units P I lost I Batch Analysis I DatelTime lAn1st Flag Volatile Organics, EPA 82608 (continued) Vinyl Chloride ND 1.74 2.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 ZT m-,p-Xylene NU 4.05 6.00 ugAkg dry 1 M V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT o-Xylene ND 2.31 3.00 ugtkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 ZT Surrogate- Tofuene-d8 98 % 90-108 1-00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 Surrogate: 4-BromoHuorobenzeno 98 % 90-114 1,00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0046 Surrogate: 1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 84 % 71-134 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0046 Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 86 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9036 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Arid Digestion of SludgesASolids Completed NIA N/A NIA 50.00 7C12001 03M 2107 0915 SOS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Copper 23.0 0.105 0.291 0rgtkg dry 1.00 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1259 SPS Molybdenum 24.8 0.215 0.593 mog dry 1.00 M3 IC12001 03/12/07 1259 SPS Nickel 17.4 0.171 0.471 mgtkg dry 1.00 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1259 SPS Vanadium 40A 0.061 0.169 mglkg dry 1.00 M3 7CI2001 03/12/07 1259 SPS Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Rev. 3, TX-1005 TPH 1005 Extraction Completed NIA NIA NIA L51 7CO8030 03/08/07 1330 NV exc TPH (C6-C 12) ND 2.99 21.0 mgfkg dry 1.51 D1 7CO8030 03/09/07 2130 PMS exc TPH (>C12-C28) NO 4.55 40.0 mgtkg dry 1.51 D1 7CO8030 03/09/07 2130 PMS exc TPH (>C28-C35) NO 7.82 17.5 mgAkg dry 1.51 D1 7C08030 03/09/07 2130 PMS exc TPH (C6-C35) ND 15.3 78.5 mgtkg dry 1.51 D1 7CO8030 03/09/07 2130 PMS exc Surrogate: I-Chlorooctane 97 % 70-130 1.51 01 7CO8030 03/09/07 2130 Surrogate: o-Terphenyl 92 % 73-130 1.51 D1 7C08030 03/09/07 2130 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5011406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-M1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 (nelV 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 20 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project; Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-09 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-B21 (2-3) Sample Daterlime 03/05/07 1202 Analyte(s) Result SQL MQL I Units I F• I Inst I Batch - _� Analysis Datetfifne JAnlst Fiag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids as 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9036 03/09107 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Add Digestion of Sludges/SoGds Completed NIA NIA NIA 4762 7C12001 03/12/07 0915 SDS Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Copper 232 0.104 0.291 mglkg dry OAS M3 7C12001 03112/07 1304 SPS Molybdenum 15.9 0-212 Q593 mgfkg dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 031121011304 SPS Nickel 11.6 0.169 0A71 mg/kg dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 03/12107 1304 SPS Vanadium 20.0 0.060 0.169 m91k9 dry 0.95 M3 7G12001 03/12/07 1304 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-Uft FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Lnela Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 21 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN. Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time-. 03/13/07 1622 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-10 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description Sample Date/Time GP-821 (3-4} �. 03/05/07 1203� Analysis Anal to s 11-_(} Result SQL � MQL I Units F` I Inst I Batch I OatetTimo_ JAnlst Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 8s 0.01 0.01 % 1,00 7CO9036 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Add Digestion of StudgerdSoirds Completed NIA NIA NIA 47.62 7C12001 03/12/07 0915 SDS Metals (Tota€), EPA 6010B Arsenic 7.73 1.06 2.69 mg/kg dry 0,95 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Barium 86.8 0.059 0.159 mglkg dry 095 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Cadmium ND 0.052 0.141 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Chromium 17.2 0.081 0.220 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7CI2001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Capper 1&0 0.107 0.291 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Lead 13.9 0273 0.741 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7G12001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Molybdenum 47.3 0.218 0.593 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7GI2001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Nickel 13.2 0.173 0.471 rnglkf1 dry 0,95 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Selenium ND 0.892 2A2 mg/kg dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 03112/07 1308 SPS Silver HD 0.235 0.638 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7GI2001 03/12/07 1308 SPS Vanadium 26.8 0.062 0.169 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 03/12107 1308 SPS Metals (Total), EPA 7471A Mercury 0.02818 0.00077 0.00375 mglkg dry OA3 M1 7C12009 03/12/07 1528 SDS TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center - Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Oda)] 400 W. Bethany Rd- • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Straw Environmental Page: Page 22 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN-. Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory It) #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-11 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-821 (6-7) Sample Datefrime 03/05/07 1205 Analysis Analyte(s) J Result SQL ,MQL l Units F* J Inst L Batch I Rateliime [Anlst _ Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, 5M 254OG % Solids 88 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9036 03/09/07 1600 HNR exe Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Acid Digestion of SfudgesfSolids Completed NIA NIA NIA 48.08 7C12001 03/12107 0915 SDS Metals (Total), EPA 6010E Copper 9.03 0.103 0.291 mg/kg dry 0.96 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1326 SPS Molybdenum 0-245 0.211 0.593 mglkg dry 0,136 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1326 SPS J Nickof 13.9 0.168 0-471 mg/kg dry 0,96 M3 7C12001 03112/07 1326 SPS Vanadium 31.8 0.060 0-169 mglkg dry 0.96 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1326 SPS TRRP Rp15 - v 2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228ftMA FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 8"647 (nelap) 400 W. Bethany Rd. + Alien, Texas 75013 Okiahoma:8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-102BB Texas- T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 23 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN. Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #_ Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-12 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-B22 (0-1) Sample Daterrime 03/05/07 1120 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SQL MQL Units _ _ _ f I_ _ Inst_ I _ _ Batch I Daterrime JAnlst I Flag rRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-11Y406 Local. (972) 727-1123 Lang Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications � Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 24 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-12 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-B22 (0-1) Sample Datefrime 03/05/07 1120 Analyte(s) Result I gqL MQL_ _ � Units�_ _ F• � Inst I Batch Analysis � DateFFime Anlst Flag Volatile Organics, EPA 82608 Benzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Bromobenzene ND 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Bromochloromethane NO 2.36 3.00 ugAtg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 ZT Bromodichloromethane NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Bromororm (Tdbromomethane) NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) NO 2.96 5.00 ug/kg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT n-13utylbenzene NO 2.96 3-00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 ZT sec-Butyfbenzene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT tort-Butylbenzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1-00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Carbon Tetrachloride NO 2-36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09107 0118 ZT Chlorobenzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) NO 3.55 5.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Chloroform ND 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Chloromelhane (Methyl Chloride) NO 2.96 5.00 ugAtq dry 100 V3 7C09030 03109/07 0118 ZT 2-Chlorotofuene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 4-Chlorololuene NO 2.36 3.00 ug/kg dry 1 A0 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 ZT Dibmmochloromethane NO 2.36 3.00 ug/kg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT (Chiorodtbmmo...) 1,24)ibromo-3cMaropropane NO 2.36 3,00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT (DBCP) 1,2-Dibmmoelhane (Ethylene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 ZT Oibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzone ND 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.0o V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry I V3 7009030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Dichlorodifluoromethane NO 2.96 5.00 uglkg dry 1 00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1,1-Dichloroethane NO 2.36 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1.2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Dichiodde) 1,1-Dichloroethene(Mnylidene NO 2.36 3.00 ug/kg dry 1-00 V3 7CO9030 03109107 0118 ZT Chloride) cis-1,2-Dichlor0ethene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry Uo V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0116 ZT trans-1 ,2-Dichlaroethene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 . Long Distance- (800) 228-MI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 8727 Oklahoma: 400 W. Bethany Rd. +Allen, Texas 75013 OklaLouisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Shaw Environmental 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Report of Sample Analysis Page: Page 25 of 47 Project: Cytec Project #: 124883 Print Date/Time, 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-12 Grab Solid Mike Franca Sample Description GP-B22 (0-1) Sample Dateffime 03/05/07 1120 Analyte(s) Result SQL i MQL I Units I F` I Just I Batch J atellime JAolst I Flag j Volatile Organics, EPA $2608 (continued) 1,2-Dichtoropropane (Propylene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109107 0118 ZT Dichloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 2,2-Dichloropropane NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 ZT 1,1-Dichloropropene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Ethyl Benzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Hexachlorobutadiene NO 2-96 3.00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) NO 2.36 3,00 uglkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT p-isapropyltoluene NO 2.96 3,00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Methyl test butyl ether (MTBE) NO 3.55 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Mothylene Bromide NO 2.96 3-00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03109/07 0118 ZT (Dibromamethane) Methylene Chloride NO 3.55 3.00 uglkg dry too V3 7C09030 03109/07 0118 ZT (Dichloromethane) Naphthalene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT n-Propylbonzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 ZT Styrene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1,00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane NO 2.36 3.00 uglkgdry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 031091070118 ZT 1,1,2,2-Teirachloroethane NO 2-96 3.00 uglkg dry 1-00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Tetrachlomethene NO 2.96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT (Perchloraelhylerrej Toluene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03109107 0118 ZT 1,43--Trichlorobenzene NO 2-36 3.00 uglkgd(y too V3 7CO9030 03/091070118 ZT 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1, 1.1-Tnchromethane (Methyl NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Chloroform) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, NO 2.36 3.00 ugkky dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Tnchloroethene NO 2-96 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 ZT j6diloroethylene) Trichlorofluoromethane NO 2.36 5-00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO 3.55 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NO 2.36 3.00 uglkg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 22$f.Q I FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications �+ �+► .� � Bethany Tech Center Arkansas: 88-0647 Suite 19© �a 400 W_ Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma_ 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 26 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTIC[: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703141-12 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Descriptio_ n GP-B22 (0-i) Sample 17ate1Time 03/05/07 1120 Analysis Analyte(s) Result I SQL I MOL [!nits_ F- I Inst I Batch I Oate1Time__JAnlst Flag Volatile organics, EPA 8260E (continued) Vinyl Chloride ND 1.77 2.00 ugfkg dry 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 ZT m-,p-Xylene ND 4.14 6.00 ugfkg dry 100 V3 7CO9030 031091010118 ZT o-Xylene NO 2.36 3.00 ug/kg dry 1.00 V3 7C09030 03/09/07 0118 ZT Surrogate: Toluene-d8 101 % 90-108 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09107 0118 Surrogate: 4-Bramofluorobenzene 97 % 90-114 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03109/07 0118 Surrogate. 1,2-0ichloroethaned4 83 % 71-134 1.00 V3 7CO9030 03/09/07 0118 Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SIN 254OG % Solids 85 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7C09036 03/09/07 1600 HNR exc Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Add Digestion of SrudgesfSorids Completed NIA NIA NIA 48.54 7C12001 03/12/07 0915 SDS Metals (Total), EPA 6010E Copper 19.6 0.108 0291 mglkg dry 0A7 M3 7C12001 03112107 1330 SPS Molybdenum 73.0 0.220 0-593 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1330 SPS Nickel 18-3 0.175 0.471 mg/kg dry 0.97 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1330 SPS Vanadium 40.0 0.063 0.169 mglkg dry 0.97 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1330 SPS Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Rev. 3, TX-1005 TPH 1005 Extraction Completed NtA NIA NIA 1.73 7CO8030 03/08/07 1330 NV exc TPH (C6-Cl2) ND 3.49 21.0 mglkg dry 1.73 01 7CO8030 03/09/07 2143 PMS exc TPH (>C12-C28) ND 5.31 40.0 mglkg dry 1.73 D1 7CO8030 03/09/07 2143 PMS exc TPH (>C28-C35) ND 9.13 17-5 mgfkg dry 113 D1 7CO8030 03109/07 2143 PMS exc TPH (C6-C35) ND 17.9 78.5 mglkg dry 1.73 D1 7CO8030 03/09/07 2143 PMS exc Surrogate. i-Chlorooctane 99 % 70-130 1.73 D1 7CO8030 03109/07 2143 Surrogate: o-Tetphenyl 92 % 73-130 1.73 07 7CO8030 03/09/07 2143 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-I FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 tnela[3 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas. E-10288 Texas: 1104 7 042 3 2 -06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 27 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Laboratory ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Icustomer 0703141-13 Grate Sample Description Solid Mike Franco GP-R22 (2-3) Sample Datefrime 03/05/07 1123 Analysis Ana[ to s) - 1!_� Result SQL ��_ _MdL_ � units � F* � lnst Batch I DatelTim�JAnlst ••• � Flag I Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 2540G % Solids 89 0.01 0.01 % 1.00 7CO9036 03/09/07 1600 HNR exe Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Add Digestion of Sfudges1Sc*ds Completed NIA NIA NIA 47.62 7C12001 03/12/07 0915 SDS Metals (Total), EPA 601013 Copper 13.4 0.103 0,291 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1335 SPS Molybdenum 1.97 0.210 0.593 mg/kg dry 095 M3 7C12001 03112f07 1335 SPS Nickel 9.35 0.167 0.471 mgA1 g dry 0.95 M3 7C12001 03/12/07 1335 SPS Vanadium 18.8 0.060 0.169 mglkg dry 0.95 M3 7GI2001 03/12/07 1335 SPS TRRP Rp15 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 rne, 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 28 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD AnalWalsL _— -_-__- _-_ i RPSttit�SQI-_. � ilnits Level R %REC Limits RPD I Limit J Flag Blank (7c09030-BLK1) Prepared: 03108/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 18:25 Benzene NO 2.00 Ugft wet Bromobenzene NO 2-00 ug/kg wet Bromochloromethane NO 2.00 u9tkg wet Bromodichloromelhane NO 2.00 ugikg wet Bromoform (rribromomethane) NO 2.50 ugikg wet Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) NO 2.50 ug/kg wet n-Butylbenzene NO 2-50 uglkg wet sec-Butylbenzene NO 2.50 Uq*g wet test-Bulylbenzene ND 2.00 ugtkg wet Carbon Tetrachloride NO 2.00 uglkg wet Chlorobenzene NO 2,00 uglkg wet Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) NO 3.00 uglkg wet Chloroform NO 2-00 uglkg wet Chtoromethane (Methyl Chloride) NO 2.50 ugtkg wet 2-Chlorotoluene NO 2.00 ugtkgwe( 4-Chlorololuene NO 2-00 ugdcg wet Dibromachloromethane NO 2.00 uglkg wet (Chlorodibmmo...) 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) NO 2.00 uWkg wet 1,2-0ibmmoathane (Ethylene NO 2.00 ugAg wet Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO 2.00 uglkgwet 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO 2.50 ug/kgwet 1,4-Dichlarobenzene NO 2,00 uglkgwet Dichlorodifluoromethane NO 2.50 uglkg wet 1,1-Dich[oroethane NO 2-00 uglkgwet 1.2-Dichloroethane(Ethylene NO 2.50 uglkgwet Dichiorida) 1,t-Dichloroethene(Vnylidene NO 2.00 uglkgwet Chloride) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NO 2-50 ugAcg wet Trans-1,2-1)ichloroethene NO 2.00 ugAcg wet 1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene ND 2.50 uglkg wet Dichlonda) 1,3-Dichloropropane NO 2.00 ug/kgwet 2,2-Dichloropropane NO 2,00 uglkgwet 1,1-Dichloropropene NO 2-50 uglkgwet Ethyl Benzene NO 2.00 ugikg wet Hexachlorobutadione NO 2.50 uglkg wet Isopropyibenzene(Cumene) NO 2.00 uglkg wet p-isopropyltoluene NO 2.50 ugtkg wet Methyl ten butyl ether (MTBE) NO 3.00 ugAtg wet TRRP Rpt 5 - v 2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-11 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications [nelap] Betthany Tech Center - Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 29 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN.' Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD �uatvtar�l Rr?cult 4rtnr l lIr,a, I Level Resull _ %REC _Limits ftPD Limit Flag Blank (7C09030-BLK1) V _ - Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 18:25 Methylene Bromide (Oibromomethane) NO 2.50 ug/kg wet Melhylene Chloride (nichloromethane) NO 3 00 ugAg wet Naphthalene NO 2.50 uglkg wet n-Propylbenzene NO 2.00 ugtkgwet Styrene NO 2.00 ugtkg wet 1,1,12-Telrachlaroethane NO 2-00 ug*gwet 1, 1,2,24-etmd hloroethaae NO 2.50 UU&q wet Tetrachtoroethene (Perchloroelhylenel NO 2.50 uglkg wet Toluene NO 2-00 uglkg wet 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NO 2.00 uglkgwet 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO 2.00 ugAgWei 1,1,1-Trkhtornethane(Methyl NO 2.00 ugtkg wet Chlamtorm) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO 2-00 tKftgwet Ttichloroethene(rrichloroethytene) NO 2.50 u91kgwet Trichlorofluoromethane NO 2.00 U09 wet 1,2,3-Trichloropropane NO 3.00 uglkgwet 1,2,4-Trimethytbenzene NO 2.00 uglkgwet 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NO 2.00 ug/kgwei Vinyl Chloride NO 1.50 uglkgwet m-,p-Xylene NO 3,50 ugtkg wet o-Xylene NO 2.00 uglkgwet Srrrragate.- Toluened8 49.7 o9lk9 wet 50.0 99 90-108 Surrogate: 4-BramoRuombertzene 48.6 uglkg wet 50.0 97 90-114 Surrogate: 1,2brchforoethane-d4 40.9 uglkgwet 50_0 82 71-134 Laboratory Control Sample (7C09030-BS1) Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed. 03/08/07 21:04 Benzene 49.9 2.00 u9tk9wet 50.0 100 70-118 Bromobenzene 45.2 2.00 ugtk9wet 50.0 90 69-113 Bromochloromethane 48.0 2.00 uglkg wet 50.0 96 67-127 Bromodichloromethane 40-2 2.00 u9tkg wet 50.0 80 69-125 8romeform(Tribromomethane) 391 2.50 u91k9wet 50.0 78 51-129 Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 39.8 2.50 u4*9 wet 50.0 80 48-146 n-Butylbenzene 48.4 2.50 uglkgwel 50,0 97 67-120 sec-Butylbenzene 48.5 2.50 u9tk9 wet 50.0 97 70-120 lert-Butylbenzene 49.3 2.00 ugtkg wet 50_0 99 69-119 Carbon Tetrachloride 36.6 2,00 ugfkgwet 50-0 73 61-133 Chlorohenzene 46-7 2.00 u91k9wet 50.0 93 69-114 Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) 41.7 3-00 uglkg wet 50.0 83 62-138 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-EMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center - Suite 190 Arkansas: 88 0647 tnelat� 400 W- Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 30 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTIC: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime. 03/13/07 16:22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD AnalviP(s1 Racrrlt i `Sol units � Level J_ Result %REC Limits RPD � Limit _[__Flag Laboratory Control Sample (7C09030-BSI) Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/03/07 21:04 Chloroform 43.6 2.00 ugfkgwet 50.0 87 68-125 Chlommethane. (Methyl Chtodde) 42.5 2.50 ugfkg wet 50.0 85 45-136 2-Chlorotoluene 46.4 2.00 ugfkg wet 50.0 93 66-118 4 Chlorotoluene 45.1 2.00 ugfkg wet 50.0 90 67-118 Dibromochlommethane 40.3 2.00 ugAcgwet 50.0 81 67-124 (Chlorodibromo-_-) 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane(D(3CP) 41.5 2.00 ug/k9 wet 50.0 83 55-120 1 2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene 43.6 2.00 ugfkg wet 50.0 87 68-121 Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 45.5 2.00 u9fkgwet 50.0 91 66-112 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 46.3 2.50 ugfkgwet 50.0 93 64-115 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 45.7 2.00 ug/kgwet 50.0 91 64-112 DichtomdiAuoromethane 31.9 2.50 ugfkg wet 50.0 64 20-150 1,1-Dichloroethane 47-2 2.00 119ATWet 50.0 94 68-126 1.2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene 37.4 2.50 uglkg wet 50.0 75 60-130 Dichloride) 1, 1 -Dichloroethene (Vinylidene 39.3 2.00 uWkg wet 50.0 79 70-127 Chloride) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.8 2.50 ugfkgwet 50.0 102 63-129 trans-1,2-0ichloroethene 47.3 2.00 ugfkg wet 50.0 95 67-128 1,2-13ichloropropane(Propylene 50.2 2.50 ugfk9wet 50.0 100 72-119 Dichloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane 44.2 2.00 uglk9Wet 50.0 88 69-116 2,2-Dichloropropane 43.2 2.00 u9M9 Wet 50.0 86 50-143 1,1-Dichloropropene 49.0 2.50 ugtkg wet 50.0 98 56-135 Ethyl Benzene 46.1 2.00 uglkg Wet 50.0 92 73-116 Hexachlorobuladiene 46.1 2.50 u91cgWet 50.0 92 61-117 lsopropylbonzene (Cumene) 47.7 2-00 ugtkg wet 50.0 95 68-122 p4sopropyltaluene 47.0 2.50 uglkg Wet 50.0 94 68-121 Methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) 43.6 3.00 uglkg wet 5Q.0 87 57-131 Methylene Bromide (Dibromomethane) 40.2 2.50 ug" wet 50.0 80 72-116 Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane) 55.3 3.00 ugAcg wet 50.0 ill 54-132 Naphthalene 45.6 2-50 uglkgwet 50.0 91 63-118 n-Propylbenzene 47.8 2-00 u09wet 50,0 96 71-119 Styrene 47.9 2.00 u09 wet 50.0 96 72-119 1, 1,0-7etachlomethane 41.0 2-00 uglkg wet 50.0 82 74-115 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlomathane 44.8 2.50 ug/kgwet 50.0 90 63-115 Tetrachloroethene (Perrhloroethytene) $0.8 2.50 u9&4 wet 50.0 102 56-142 Toluene 48.9 2.00 og"wet 50.0 98 71-114 1,2,3-Trich)orobenzene 45.8 2.00 t4*9 Wet 50.0 92 59-118 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 45.5 2.00 u9+kg Wet 50.0 91 54-123 -rRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance; (800) 228-,`R l FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 (nelap 400 W. Bethany Rd. + Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 31 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN-. Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %RFC RPO *';01 _1 Ipij5 LevelResufi A %REC Lin- RPO f Limit Flay Laboratory Control Sample (7C09030-BS1) Prepared: 03108/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 21.04 1. 1, 1 Trichloroelhane(Methyl 39.1 2.00 u"9 wet 50-0 78 69-126 Chloroform) 1,1,2-Trichlorcethane 45.5 2.00 ugfkg-1 50.0 91 73-112 Trichtareethene (rrichloroethyrene) 44.6 2.50 ugtkg wet 50.0 89 73-119 Trichloroftucromethane 33.3 2.00 uglkg wet 50.0 67 60-137 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 40.7 3.00 uglkgwet 50.0 81 67-114 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 46-3 2.00 ugtkg wet 50.0 93 70-117 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzone 46.7 2.00 ugkgwet 50.0 93 69-119 Vtnyl Chloride 39.6 1.50 uglkgwet 50.0 79 61-129 m-,p-Xylene 89.4 3.50 u9fk9 Wet 100 89 75-114 o-Xylene 44.7 2.00 uglkgwet 50.0 89 71-117 Surrogate: Tofuene413 50.7 ug/kg wet 50.0 101 90-108 Surrogate: 4-BromoAuorobenzene 48.3 - ug;kg wet 50.0 97 90-114 Surrogate:l,2-DichloroeMaae-d4 38.0 uglkgwet 54.0 76 71-134 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (TC09030-BSD1) Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 21:36 Benzene 49.8 Bromobenzene 45.3 Bromochloromethane 48.3 Bromodichloromethane 40.2 Bromoform (Tdbramamethane) 41.6 Bromamethane (Methyl Bromide) 37.8 n-Butylbenzene 46.5 sec-Butylbenzene 47-9 tert-Butylbenzene 46.6 Carbon Tetrachloride 36.7 Chlorobenzene 46.1 Chloroethane (Ethyl Chtaride) 41.0 Chloroform 43-3 Chloromethane (Methyl Chlande) 42.7 2-Chlorotofuene 45.8 4-Chlorotoluene 44.4 Dibromochloromelhane 41.1 (Chtorodibromo...) 1,2-ntbromo-3chloropropane (DBCP) 46.8 1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene 45.2 Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 45.2 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 45-5 1 A Dichlorobenzene 44-9 2-00 ugtkg wet 50-0 100 70-118 0.2 12 2.00 uglkgwet 50.0 91 69-113 0.2 10 2.00 1x9*9 wet 50.0 97 67-127 0.6 13 2.00 ug/kg wet 50.0 80 69-125 0 11 2,50 "09 wet 50.0 83 51-129 6 12 2.50 ugtkg wet 50.0 76 48-146 5 26 2,50 -A9 wet 50.0 93 67-120 4 13 2.50 uglkgwet 50-0 96 70-120 1 12 2.00 uglkg wet 50.0 93 69-119 6 14 2.00 uglkgwet 50.0 73 61-133 0.3 13 2.00 ugtkg wet 50.0 92 69-114 1 12 3.00 u9&9 wet 50.0 82 62-138 2 22 2.00 u9A 9 wet 50.0 87 68-125 0.7 14 2.50 ugtkg wet 50.0 85 45-136 0.5 30 2.00 u91kg wet 50.0 92 66-118 1 13 2.00 u9mg wet 50.0 89 67-118 2 12 2.00 ugAg wet 50.0 82 67-124 2 11 2A0 u91k9wet 50.0 94 55-120 12 18 2.00 ugfk9 wet 50.0 90 68-121 4 13 2-00 ugtkg wet 50_0 90 66-112 0.7 10 2.50 uglkgwet 50.0 91 64-115 2 11 2.00 uAg wet 50.0 90 64-112 2 12 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-11 f 406 Local. (972) 727-1123 Long Distance. (800) 228-Ml FAX. (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88 0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 32 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec - Irving, TX 75063 Project #_ 124883 ATTN_ Kenneth Tramm Print Date[Time.- 03/13/07 16:22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD AnaitrtPlsl ---- _ -__ ��estilt �_�SQI---_l_tlnitsJ Level Result %REG Limits a RPD I Limit Flag Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C09030-13SO1) Prepared: 03/08107 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08107 21:36 Dichlorodifluoromethane 32.8 2.50 ugA�g wet 50.0 66 20-150 3 21 1,1-Dichloroethane 48.5 2.00 uglkgwet 50.0 97 68-126 3 20 1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene 38.3 2.50 ugk9 Wet 50.0 77 60-130 2 14 Dichlonde) 1.1-Dichloroethene(trnyliaene 41-4 2.00 uglkgwet 50.0 83 70-127 5 15 Chloride) cis-1,2-Dichloroothene 52.0 2-50 uglkgwet 50-0 104 63-129 2 14 trans-1.2-Dichloroethene 47.2 2.00 uglkg wet 50.0 94 67-128 0.2 16 1,24)Ic4loropropme(Propyleoo 49.8 2.50 "g/kgwet 50.0 100 72-119 0.8 10 Dichloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane 45.1 2-00 ug"wai 50.0 90 69-116 2 12 2,2-Dichloropropane 43.3 2-00 uglkgwet 50-0 87 50-143 0.2 17 1,1-Dichloropropene 47.1 2.50 ull"wet 50.0 94 56-135 4 14 Ethyl Benzene 44.8 2.00 uglkgwet 50.0 90 73-116 3 12 Ltexachtorobutadiene 46.5 2.50 uglkgwet 50.0 93 61-117 0.9 15 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 46.9 2.00 ugrkg wet 50-0 94 68-122 2 11 p-Isoprapylloluene 46A 2.50 uglkg wet 50.0 93 68-121 0-9 13 Mothyt tort butyl ether (MTBE) 45.3 3.00 u9tg Wet 50.0 91 57-131 4 14 Methylene Bromide (Dibromomethane) 41.7 2.50 u91k9 wet 50.0 83 72-116 4 11 Methylene Chloride (Didiloromethane) 56.4 3.00 ug kg Wet 50-0 113 54-132 2 16 Naphthalene 49.0 2.50 uglkg wet 50.0 98 63-118 7 18 n-Propylbenzene 47.3 2.00 ugtkg wet 50_0 95 71-119 1 10 Styrene 47.2 2.00 WO Wet 50.0 94 72-119 1 12 1,1,1,2-Tetrachlaroethane 41.0 2_00 uglkgwet 500 82 74-115 0 10 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachlomethane 48.8 2.50 u9/1<9 wet 50.0 98 63-115 9 11 Tetrachloroethene (Pmchloroethylene) 53.5 2.50 uglkg wet 50.0 107 56-142 5 19 Toluene 48.0 2.00 04we( 50.0 96 71-114 2 11 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 46.6 2.00 ug*9 Wet wo 93 59-118 2 12 1,2,44fichlorobenzene 46.5 2.00 ugikgwet 50.0 93 54-123 2 25 1.1. t-Tnchloroethane (Methyl 38.5 2.00 ugtkg Wet 50.0 77 69-126 2 13 Chloroform) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 45.4 2,00 u9fkgWet 50.0 91 73-112 0.2 16 Trichlomethene (Trichloroethylene) 4.4.9 2.50 uog wet 50.0 90 73-119 0.7 11 Tdchlorofluoromethane 33-0 2-00 egjkg wet 50.0 66 60-137 0.9 22 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 44.6 3.00 u09wet 50.0 89 67-114 9 11 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 45.2 2.00 uglkgwet 50_0 90 70-117 2 12 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 46.5 2.00 ugfkg wet 50.0 93 69-119 0-4 12 Vinyl Chloride 39.8 1.50 uglkgwet 50.0 80 61-129 0.5 16 m-,p-Xylene 86-9 3-50 uglkg wet 100 87 75-114 3 12 o-Xylene 43.9 2.00 uglkgwet 50.0 88 71-117 2 13 surrogate: Toluene48 49.9 ugrkg wet 50-0 100 90-108 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 long Distance: (800) 228-EM1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Fnela) 400 W. Bethany lid. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas- T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shave Environmental Page: Page 33 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time-. 03/13/07 16:22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD Analvtwr�l I Rwerrlt `sol I Inits I _Level _ Result %oREC I Limits I RPD I Limit I Flag Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C09030-BSD1) Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08107 21:36 Surrogate: 4-8mmofluoro6enzene 49•2 ug/kg wet 50.0 98 90-114 Surrogate.- 1,2-Dichtaroethane-d4 39-8 ug/kg wet 50_0 80 71-134 Matrix Spike (7C09030-MS1) Prepared: 03108/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 22:08 Source: 0703141-06 Benzene 55.4 2.52 u9*9dfY 62.9 NO 88 61-118 Bromobenzene 42.9 2.52 u9tk9d8' 62.9 NO 68 51-117 Bromochloromethano 51.4 2.52 ugtkg dry 62.9 NO 82 59-124 Bromodichloromethane 42.6 2.52 u9tk9 dry 62.9 ND 68 57-124 Bromororm (Tribromomethane) 38.1 3.14 ugtkg dry 62.9 NO 61 34-130 9romomelhane(MethytGromidel 50.9 3.14 u9/k9dry 62.9 NO 81 46-142 n-Butylbenzene 47.4 3.14 u9/kgdry 62.9 NO 75 38-129 sec-Butylbenzene 50.6 3-14 nAg dry 62.9 NO 80 45-128 tert-Butyibenzene 49.6 2.52 ug/kg dry 62.9 NO 79 49-123 Carbon Tetrachloride 43A 2.52 u9/k9 dry 62.9 ND 69 47-132 Chlorobenzene 46.7 2.52 u9tk9dry 62.9 NO 74 50-120 Chloroelhane (Ethyl Chloride) 53.6 3.77 ug/kg dry 62.9 NO 85 45-148 Chloroform 48.6 2.52 u9/kgdry 62.9 NO 77 55-128 Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride) 50.0 3.14 ugtkg dry 62.9 NO 79 30-143 2-Chlorotoluene 45.5 2.52 uglkgdty 62.9 NO 72 46-123 4-Chlorotoluene 43.2 2,52 ugtkgdry 62-9 NO 69 45-123 Dibromochloromelhane 41.0 2.52 ugtk9 dry 62.9 ND 65 49-128 (Chlorodibromo...) 1.2-Dibromo-3chlaropropane (DBCP) 40.8 2.52 u91k9 dry 62.9 NO 65 38-120 1,24Dibromoethane (Elhyleno 43.7 2.52 ug/k9 dry 62-9 ND 69 54-121 Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 38.9 2.52 ug+ksdry 62.9 NO 62 40-120 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 40.9 3.14 ug/kgdry 62.9 ND 65 40-120 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 39.7 2-52 ugtkg dry 62.9 NO 63 38-121 Dichlorodifluoromelhane 43.0 3.14 LK09dry 62.9 NO 68 5-164 1,1-1)ichloroelhane 53.3 2-52 ug/kg dry 62.9 ND 85 56-128 1,2-01chtoroethane (Ethylene 40.5 3.14 ug/kg dry 62.9 NO 64 51-125 Dichloride) 1.1-Dichkwoethene (Vinylidene 51.1 2.52 ug/kg dry 62.9 NO 81 60-130 Chlonde) cis-1,2-Dichtoroethene 5&3 3.14 ugtkgdry 62.9 NO 93 51-131 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 55.7 2.52 ugtk9 dry 62.9 NO 89 59-127 1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene 54-0 3.14 ugtkg dry 62.9 NO 86 60-119 Dichloride) 1,3-Dichloropropane 44.7 2.52 ug/kg dry 62-9 NO 71 58-114 2,2-Dichloropropane 50.9 2.52 ug/kg dry 62.9 NO 81 40-137 1,1-Dichloropropene 56.6 3-14 ug/kg dry 62.9 NO 90 52-129 TRRP Rpt 5 - v 2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 '+ Environmentai Laboratories StateCertitications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 q te 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page_ Page 34 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03M 3/07 16.22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD 1 RLs It Level Result I %REC Limits I RPD Limit Flag - A alv(P(c1 Matrix Spike (7C09030-MS1) Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 22:08 Source: 0703141-06 Ethyl Benzene 47.8 2.52 ug&9dry 62.9 ND 76 50-125 i-lexachlorobutadiene 44.5 3.14 ug1k9dry 62.9 ND 71 31-124 Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) 50.8 2,52 u9+k9dfy 62.9 ND 81 47-127 p-Isopropyltoltlene 48-0 3.14 ugMgdfY 62-9 ND 76 46-126 Methyl tarl butyl ewer (MTBE) 47,7 3.77 uglkg dry 62.9 ND 76 52-124 Methylene &omide(Dibromomathane) 42-2 3.14 uglkgdfy 62.9 ND 67 59-115 Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane) 61.4 3.77 uglkg dry 62.9 NO 98 42-133 Naphthalene 31.9 3A4 uglkgdfy 62.9 NO 51 23-131 n-Propylbenzene 49.5 2.52 uglkgdry 62.9 ND 79 42-131 Styrene 45.5 2.52 ugtkg dfy 62.9 NO 72 47-127 1,1.1,2-Tetrach[oroethane 42-6 2.52 uglk9drY 62-9 ND 68 55-121 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 45-4 3A4 ugfk9dry 62.9 ND 72 47-114 Tetrachloroethene(Perdiloronthylene) 56.9 3.14 uglkgdfy 62.9 NO 90 43-157 Toluene 52.4 2.52 ugfkgdfY 62.9 ND 83 54-120 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 30.8 2.52 ugikgdry 62-9 NO 49 20-129 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzeno 32.7 2.52 ugikgdry 62-9 NO 52 21-128 1,1,1-Tnrh[oroethane(Methyl 45A 2.52 uAgdry 62.9 ND 72 53-130 Chloroform) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 45-8 2.52 u09dry 62.9 NO 73 60-113 Tnchloruethene (Trichloroethylene) 49.5 3.14 ugikg dry 62.9 NO 79 57-129 Trichlorofluoromethane 44,1 2,52 ugMgdry 62.9 NO 70 39-147 1,2,3-Trichioropropane 40.8 3.77 uglkgdry 62.9 ND 65 48-123 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 46.4 2.52 tiog dry 62.9 ND 72 43-125 1,3,5-Trimelhylbenzene 47.6 2.52 uglkgdry 62.9 ND 76 48-124 Vinyl Chloride 51.8 1.89 uq&gdfy 62.9 NO 82 34-149 m-,p-Xylene 91.3 4.40 ugAcgdry 126 ND 72 49-125 o-Xylene 45.4 2.52 uglkgdry 62.9 ND 72 53-122 Surrogate'%luened8 62.8 uglkgdry 62,9 100 90-108 Surrogate4-Promoduorobenzeue 61.6 uglkgdrY 62-9 98 90-114 Surrogate:1,2-PichWoothane-d4 49.4 ugncgdfy 62_9 79 71-134 rRRP Rpr s - v.2.541 r4os Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-MI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center * Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Lg_�Iap] 400 W. BethanyRd, • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 35 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 1622 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD Analvta/s1 J Rpcvll I •Sfli i 1lruts ! Level Result %REC Limits RPD I Limit I Flag Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C09030-MSDi) Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 22:39 Source: 0703141-06 Benzene 55.4 2.52 u9fk9dry 62.9 NO 88 61-118 0 16 Bromobenzene 44.9 2.52 u91rg dry 62.9 NO 71 51-117 5 22 Bromochioromethane 52.9 2.52 u9lksdry 62.9 ND 84 59-124 3 26 Bromodichloromethane 44.5 2.52 u91k9dry 62-9 ND 71 57-124 4 18 Brmnoform (Tribromomethane) 40.2 3.14 u91k9 dry 62.9 ND 64 34-130 5 23 Bmmomethane (Methyl Bromide) 49.3 3.14 UgAr9 dry 62.9 NO 78 46-142 3 27 n-Butylbenzene 49.4 3,14 u9*9dry 62.9 NO 79 38-129 4 24 sec-Butylbenzene 52.5 3.14 Ugtkg dry 62.9 NO 83 45-128 4 19 tent-Butylbenzene 51.9 2,52 u9fk9 dry 62.9 ND 83 49-123 5 32 Carbon Tetrachloride 43.1 2.52 u9A9dry 62.9 NO 69 47-132 0.7 30 Chlorobenzene 47.7 2.52 u9Ar9dry 62.9 ND 76 50-120 2 19 Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride) 53.7 3.71 u9M9 dry 62.9 NO 85 45-148 0.2 30 Chloroform 49.1 2.52 ug1r9 dry 62.9 ND 78 55-128 1 26 Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride) 53.1 3,14 u91k9 dry 62.9 NO 84 30-143 6 18 2-Chlorotoluene 46.7 2.52 u91ks dry 62.9 NO 74 46-123 3 16 4-Chlorotoluene 44.2 2.52 u9rk9dly 62.9 NO 70 45-123 2 22 Dihmmochloromethane 43.6 2.52 ugfkg dry 62.9 NO 69 49-128 6 23 (Chlomdibm,no.. _) 1.2-RiNomo-3tfidorapropane (06CP) 40.2 2.52 usK9 do 62.9 ND 64 38-120 1 21 1,2-Dibmmuethane(Ethylene 45.3 2.52 ug&gdry 62.9 NO 72 54-121 4 19 Dibromide) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 39.1 2.52 ugtk9dry 62.9 ND 62 40-120 0.5 24 1,3-Oichlorobenzene 40.7 3-14 ugftdry 62.9 NO 65 40-120 0.5 23 1,4-Dichlorohenzene 40.6 2.52 ug/kgdry 62.9 NO 65 38-121 2 27 D7chlaradifiuoromethane 39.9 3.14 u9ftdry 62.9 ND 63 5-164 7 26 1,1-Dichloroethane 54.0 2.52 ug1k9dry 62-9 NO 86 56-128 1 17 1.2-Dichloroethane(Ethylene 40.9 3A4 u91k9d1y 62.9 NO 65 51-125 1 24 Dichloride) 1. 1 -Dichloroethene (vinylidene 49-3 2.52 u09 dry 62.9 ND 78 60-130 4 31 Chloride) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 59.3 3.14 u91k9dry 62.9 ND 94 51-131 2 20 trans-1,2-Diddoroethene 518 2.52 ug/kgdry 62.9 NO 86 59-127 3 20 1 2-Dichlompropane (Propylene 54.7 3.14 u9/k9 dry 62-9 NO 87 60-119 1 13 Dichloride) 1,3-Dichloroprepane 47.0 2.52 u09dry 62-9 NO 75 58-114 5 19 2,2-Diddaropropane 50.4 2.52 u9&9 dry 62.9 NO 80 40-137 1 36 1,1-Dichloropropene 55.3 3.14 uglk9dry 62.9 NO 88 52-129 2 25 Ethyl Benzene 49.3 2.52 uAgdry 62.9 NO 78 50-125 3 22 Hexachlorobutadiene 46.0 3,14 ug*gdry 62.9 ND 73 31-124 3 35 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 53.3 2.52 ugM9 dry 62.9 NO 85 47-127 5 25 p-Isopropyltoluene 49.6 3.14 u9lkg dry 62.9 NO 79 46-126 3 19 Methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) 49.1 3.77 u9dr9 dry 62.9 NO 78 52-124 3 21 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-1114W Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-Ml FAX: (972) 727-1176 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 11nelap] 403 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: age 36 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project M 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Datefrime: 03/13/07 16:22 Volatile Organics - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD afytPlsl I Raarrlf -Sol I llnits-1 Level WWII %REC Limits i RPD Limit f Flag Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C09030-MSD1 )- Prepared: 03/08/07 15:45 Analyzed: 03/08/07 22:39 Source: 0703141-06 Methylene Bromide (Dihromomethane) 43.3 3-14 u9/k9 dry 62.9 ND fig 59-115 3 20 Methylene Chloride (blchlommethanel 63.6 3.77 E109 dry 62-9 ND 101 42-133 4 24 Naphthalene 29-2 3.14 u9f9 drY 62.9 ND 46 23-131 9 28 n-Propylbenzene 51-9 2.52 u9lk9dry 62.9 ND 83 42-131 5 16 Styrene 46.3 2.52 u9f9 dry 62.9 ND 74 47-127 2 25 1,1.1,2-Tetmchloroethane 45-0 2.52 uglkgMy 62.9 ND 72 55-121 5 20 1,1,2 2-Tetrachtoraethane 47.3 3.14 u9*9 dry 62.9 ND 75 47-114 4 27 Tetrachlomethene(Perchloraelirylenel 58.5 3.14 u9lkgdry 62.9 ND 93 43-157 3 27 Toluene 53.9 2,52 u9&9dry 62.9 ND 86 54-120 3 20 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 27.8 2.52 of t9dry 62.9 ND 44 20-129 10 33 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 30-1 2.52 ugnrydry 62.9 ND 48 21-128 8 29 1,1.1 Tnchlaroethane (Methyl 45-1 2.52 u9*9 dry 62.9 ND 72 53-130 0 24 Chloroform) 1,1,2-Trichloroelhane 47.9 2.52 u91k9dry 62.9 ND 76 60-113 4 25 Trichloroeltiene (rrichloroethytene) 50.2 3.14 u9/k9 dry 62.9 ND 80 57-120 1 20 Trichlorotluoremethane 42.3 2-52 W19 dry 62.9 ND 67 39-147 4 20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 42.6 3.77 ug/kgdry 62.9 ND 68 48-123 4 22 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 46.7 2.52 u91kgdry 62-9 ND 74 43-125 3 17 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 48-8 2.52 u9lkgdry 62.9 ND 78 48-124 2 16 Vinyl Chloride $1.7 1-89 u9lk9 dry 62.9 ND 82 34-149 0.2 21 m-,p-Xylene 92.9 4.40 ug/kg dry 126 ND 74 49-125 2 23 o-Xylene 46.5 2.52 u9/k9 dry 62-9 ND 74 53-122 2 19 Surrogate: raluene-rib 62.3 uog dry 62.9 99 90-108 Surrogate: 4-BrofmiTuombenzene 62.4 ug*q dry 62-9 99 90-114 Surrogate: 1,2-0ichloroethan"4 46.9 ugtkg dry 62.9 75 71-1344 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance. (800) 228-EftMl FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center +Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Ind. + Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Straw Environmental Page: Page 37 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Conventional Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD E `St�l l Level I Result %REC Limit RPD I Limit , Flag �tlalvtQltl RwanlF IInifa Blank (7C09035-BLKi) — ------- Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 16:00 % Solids ND 0.01 % Duplicate (7C09035-DUPi) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 16-00 Source: 0703140.03 % Solids 98 0.01 % 9fi 2 3.5 Blank (7C09036-BLtt1 ) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09107 16:00 % Solids ND 0.01 % Duplicate (7C09036-DUP1 ) Prepared & Analyzed: 03109/07 16:00 Source: 0703141-06 % Solids 8o 0.01 % 79 1 3.5 rRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 721-1123 Long Distance- (800) 228— M1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories state Certifications Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647� 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 38 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 - ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatefTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Metals (Total) - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD ( Level Result I %REC # Limits- j RPD Limit ! Flag �oaiWPlel I l3aa�ilf I •Sr1l I Ilnils_ Blank (7C09010-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Add Digestion of Sludges/Solids Completed Arsenic NO Barium NO Cadmium NO Chromium NO Copper NO Lead NO Molybdenum NO Nickel NO Selenium NO Silver NO Vanadium NO Laboratory Control Sample (7C09010-SS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Add Digestion of SludgestSolids Completed Arsenic 47.1 Barium 47.1 Cadmium 47.1 Chromium 47.9 Copper 47.4 Lead 46.4 Molybdenum 48.4 Nickel 43.7 Selenium 94.0 Silver 47.2 Vanadium 48.8 NIA NIA 0.907 mgtkgwet 0.050 mgtkg wet 0.044 mgfkg wet 0.069 mg/kg wet 0.091 mgtkg wet 0.233 mglkg wet 0.186 mgfkg wet 0.148 mg/kg wet 0.782 mglkg wet 0.201 mg/kg wet 0.053 mglkg wet NIA NIA 0-0 0.907 mg/kg wet 50.0 94 86-110 0.050 mg/kg wet 50.0 94 90-107 0.044 mglkg wet 50.0 94 84-112 0.069 mglkg wet 50.0 96 87-110 0,091 mglkg wet 50.0 95 86-106 0.233 mglkg wet 50.0 93 82-110 0.186 mg/kg—t 50-0 97 91-111 0.148 mglkg wet 50.0 87 82-109 0.762 mg/kg wet 100 94 83-106 0-201 mglkg wet 50.0 94 87-104 0.053 mglkg wet 50.0 98 75-125 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-Ml FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 39 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #_ 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03113/07 16.22 Metals (Total) - Quality Control UP E�Y' a P C_ Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: F-10288 Texas- T104704232-06-TX Spike Source %REC RPD -Ariande(sl I RPc„!t_-not 1 initc I Level Result I %REC I Limits [ RPD I Limit I Flag Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C09010-BSDi) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Add Digestion ofSludges/Solids Completed Arsenic 46.9 Barium 46A Cadmium 46.8 Chromium 47.4 Copper 46.8 Lead 45.7 Molybdenum 48.3 Nickel 43.5 Selenium 92.2 Silver 46.7 Vanadium 48.1 Matrix Spike (7C09010-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed_ 03/09/07 10:29 Add Digestion of Sludges/Sotids Completed Arsenic 59.9 Barium 148 Cadmium 50.3 Chromium 86.8 Copper 74.4 Lead 67.0 Molybdenum 47.3 Nickel 67.8 Selenium 104 Silver 52.0 Vanadium 109 NIA NIA 0-0 0.907 mgmg wet 50.D 86-110 0.050 mgmg wet 50.0 90-107 0 044 mgmg wet 50.0 84-112 0.069 mgmg well 50.0 87-110 0.091 mgmg wet 50.0 86-106 0.233 mgmg wet 50.0 82-110 0.186 m9m9 wet 50.0 91-111 0.148 mg/kg wet 50.0 82-109 0.762 mgtkg wet 100 83-106 0.201 mgmg wet 50_0 87-104 0.053 mgmg-1 50.0 75-125 94 93 94 ss 94 91 97 87 92 93 96 Source_ 0703112-03 NIA ND 1.11 6.67 88 0.061 99.0 81 0.054 0.189 83 0.084 32.2 90 0.111 25.2 81 0.284 19.4 79 0.227 ND 78 0.180 21.2 77 0.929 ND 86 0-245 ND 86 0.065 45.7 105 NIA mgmg tlry Mg/kg tlry mglkg dry mg/kg tlry mg/kg dry mglkg dry mglkg dry mgmg dry mgm9dry mglkg tlry Mg/kg dry 60.4 60.4 60.4 60.4 fi0.4 60.4 60.4 60.4 121 60.4 1i0.4 0-0 75-125 75-125 75-118 75-120 75-125 75-118 75-124 75-116 75-116 75-118 75-125 0 6 s 6 s 5 6 7 5 6 5 20 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 tong Distance: (800) 228-ERI.41 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories Slate Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W- Bethany Rd. + Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8721 Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 40 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Project #: 124883 Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Metals (Total) - Quality Control [nelap Louisiana: 02001 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Spike Source %REC RPD _Analvlalcl { WWI � -SDI I tnits I Level Resull I %REC ! Limits I RPD I Limit i Flag Matrix Spike (7C09010-MS2) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Source: 0703124-01 Add Digestion of SludgesrSolids Completed NIA NIA ND 0-0 Arsenic 2470 51.5 mgfkg dry 2790 ND 89 75-125 Barium 2840 2.84 mglkg dry 2790 391 88 75-125 Cadmium 2430 2.50 mglkg dry 2790 3.38 87 75-118 Chromium 2490 3.92 mglkg dry 2790 21.7 88 75-120 Copper 2850 5.17 m9r=g dry 2790 319 91 75-125 Lead 2380 13.2 mOg dry 2790 16.3 85 75-118 Molybdenum 2510 10.6 mg'kg dry 2790 NO 90 75-124 Nickel 2310 8.41 mglkg dry 2790 56.9 82 75-116 Selenium 4830 43.3 mg/kg dry 5570 ND 87 75-116 Silver 2430 11.4 mglkg dry 2790 ND 87 75-118 Vanadium 2510 3.01 mglkg dry 2790 6.19 90 75-125 Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C09010-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/01 10:29 Source: 0703112-03 Acid Digestion or Sludges/Solids Completed NIA NIA ND 0-0 0 Arsenic 70.9 1-11 mglkgdry 59.2 6.67 108 75-125 17 20 Barium 166 0.061 nuftg dry 592 99.0 113 75-125 11 19 Cadmium 59.9 0.054 nmpQ dry 59.2 0.189 101 75-118 17 20 Chromium 96.6 0.084 mgfkg dry 59.2 32-2 109 75-120 11 19 Copper 82.9 0.111 mgtkg dry 59.2 25.2 97 75-125 11 15 Lead 77.0 0.284 mgtkg dry 59.2 19.4 97 75-118 14 19 Molybdenum 54.5 0-227 mglkg dry 59.2 ND 92 75-124 14 18 Nickel 81.7 0.180 mgrkg dry 59.2 21.2 102 75-116 19 18 D-04 Selenium 124 0.929 mglkg dry 118 ND 105 75-116 18 18 Silver 62.8 0.245 mgikg dry 59.2 ND 106 75-118 19 20 Vanadium 128 0.065 mg&g dry 59.2 45.7 139 75-125 16 20 Q-02, 0-14 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (9721727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERM1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 Lndap] 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma:8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas- T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 41 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN. Kenneth Tramm Print Datefrime: 03/13/07 16.22 Metals (Total) - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD J�naEvtAlcl Rase�k •Sn�l Units 1Level I5�t %REC Limits I RPD I Limit I Flag Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C09010-MSD2) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/09/07 10:29 Source: 0703124-01 Add Digestion of Sludges/Solids Completed NIA NIA ND Arsenic 2370 51.5 mgfk9 dry 2790 ND Barium 2780 2-84 mgfkgdry 2790 391 Cadmium 2410 2.50 m9fkg dry 2790 3.38 Chromium 2460 3.92 mg/k9 dry 2790 21_7 Copper 2730 5.17 m9*9 dry 2790 319 Lead 2370 13.2 nlgftdry 2790 16.3 Molybdenum 2500 10.6 mgkgdry 2790 ND Nickel 2290 8.41 m9lkg dry 2790 16.9 Selenium 4790 43.3 m9tkg dry 5570 NO Silver 2390 11 A mgJkg dry 2790 ND Vanadium 2480 _ 3.01 m9/k9 dry 2790 6.19 Blank (7C72001-BLKI) — Prepared & Analyzed: 03/12/07 09:15 Add Digestion of SludgesfSolids Completed NIA NIA Arsenic NO 0-907 mglkgwet Barium NO 0.050 rnog wet Cadmium NO 0.044 mglkg wet Chromium NO 0,069 mgtkgwet Copper NO 0.091 mgrkgwet Lead NO 0.233 mglkgwet Molybdenum ND 0.186 mgfkg wet Nickel NO 0.148 m9*9'Ket Selenium NO 0.762 mglkgwet Silver NO 0.201 mglkg wet Vanadium NO 0.053 mgfkgwet D-0 0 85 75-125 4 20 86 75-125 2 19 86 75-118 0.8 20 87 75-120 1 19 86 75-125 4 15 84 75-118 0.4 19 90 75-124 0.4 18 81 75-116 0.9 18 86 75-116 0.8 18 86 75-116 2 20 89 75-125 1 20 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228- RMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications + Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 4 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 42 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project M 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time-. 03/13/07 16:22 Metals (Total) - Quality Control Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Spike Source %REC RPD �affdP(sl l RPSI Ir -Sol Unite Level Result %REr- I Limits I RPD ( Limit I Flag - - Laboratory Control Sample (7C12001-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/12/07 09:15 Add Oigestiun of Sludges/Solids Completed NIA NIA 0-0 Arsenic 50.4 0.907 m91k9-1 50.0 101 86-110 Barium 48.3 0.050 mg/kg "vet 50-0 97 90-107 Cadmium 49.6 0.044 m91kg-t 50.0 99 84-112 Chromium 49.3 0.069 mog wet 50.0 99 87-110 Copper 48.8 0.091 m9tk9wet 50D 98 86-106 Lead 48-8 0.233 mgtkg wet 50.0 98 82-110 Molybdenum 51.3 0.186 mglk9 wet 50.0 103 91-111 Nickel 48.2 0.148 mgfkg-t 50-0 96 82-109 Selenium 98.6 0.762 m91k9wet 100 99 83A06 Silver 48.8 0.201 m9tkg wet 50.0 98 87-104 Vanadium 50.7 0.053 0109 wet 50.0 101 75-125 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C12001-BSDI) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/12/07 09:15 Add Digestion of SludgeslSolds Completed Arsenic 51.4 Barium 48.6 Cadmium 49.8 Chromium 49.5 Copper 49.0 Lead 48.7 Molybdenum 51.6 Nickel 48.7 Selenium 99.0 Silver 49.8 Vanadium 51.0 NIA NIA 0-0 0 0.907 mgfkgwet 50-0 103 86-110 2 6 0.050 mgtkg wet 50.0 97 90-107 0.6 6 0.044 mgNg wet 50.0 100 84-112 0.4 6 0.069 m09 wet 50.0 99 87-110 0.4 6 0.091 mgncg wet 50.0 98 86-106 0.4 5 0.233 m9rk9 wet 50-0 97 82-110 0.2 6 0.186 mgfkg wet 50.0 103 91-111 0.6 7 0.148 mg/kg wet 50.0 97 82-109 1 5 0.762 m91tg wet 100 99 83-106 0.4 6 0.201 m9rk9 wet 50.0 100 87-104 2 5 0.053 -gfkg wet 50.0 102 75-125 0.6 20 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-Ml FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 43 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Project 9: 124883 Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Metals (Total) - Quality Control (gelap] Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E=-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Spike Source %REC RPD AnalvlP�s1 _- - I Remelt •Sr]E l Iingi, I Level Resuft i %REC Limits ! RPD f Limit I Flag Matrix Spike (7C12001-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/12/07 09:15 Add Digestion of Sludges/Solids Completed Arsenic 72.1 Barium 144 Cadmium 60.6 Chromium $3.1 Capper 68.2 Lead 82.3 Molybdenum 70.6 Nickel 73.0 Selenium 130 Silver 62.7 Vanadium 95.7 Matrix Spike Duplicate QC12001-MS01) Prepared & Analyzed. 03/12107 09:15 Acid Digestion of SludgeslSolids Completed Arsenic 74.1 Barium 149 Cadmium 61.7 Chromium 84.4 Copper 69.2 Lead 70.6 Molybdenum 70.8 Nickel 74.0 Selenium 133 Silver 63.7 Vanadium 96.7 Source: 0703141-06 N1A NIA ND 0-0 1-14 mgAWdry 59.9 5.31 112 75-125 0.063 mg*9 dry 59.9 85.9 97 75-125 0.055 m941�9 dry 59.9 ND 101 75-118 0.087 m9*9 dry 59.9 19.4 106 75-120 0.114 m9fkg dry 59.9 9.87 97 75-125 0.293 m9fk9 dry 59.9 1720 -2730 75-118 0.234 m9tkg dry 59.9 8.84 103 75-124 0-186 m9tkgdry 59A 14A 98 75-116 0.958 mgM9 dry 120 ND 108 75-116 0.253 mg`fk9 dry 59.9 ND 105 75-118 0.067 mg/kg dry 59.9 28-1 113 75-125 Source: 0703141-06 NIA NIA ND 0-0 0 1.14 mgll�9 dry 60.5 5.31 114 75-125 3 20 0.063 m9M9 dry 60.5 85.9 104 75-125 3 19 0.055 mg" dry 60.5 ND 102 75-118 2 20 0.087 m9*g dry 60.5 19A 107 75-120 2 19 0.114 MU/kg dry 60.5 9.87 98 75-125 1 15 0.293 m9&g dry 60.5 1720 -2730 75-118 15 19 0.234 (Dgtkg dry 60.5 8.84 102 75-124 0.3 18 0.186 m9tkg drY 60.5 14-4 99 75-116 1 18 0.958 M"g dry 121 ND 110 75-116 2 18 0.253 m9)kg dry 60-5 ND 105 75-118 2 20 0.067 mg*g dly 60.5 28.1 113 75-125 1 20 Q-02, Q-15 0-02. 0-15 7RRP Rp15 - v.2.5-111906 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental laboratories State Certifications [el � i Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 4� 400 W- Bethany Rd. • Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas. E-10288 Texas:T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 44 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project 9: 124883 ATTN-. Kenneth Tramm Print Datef irne: 03/13/07 16:22 Metals (Total) - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD Anakvtw(-1 { Qyal11t -Sol I t tnits I Level Result i %REC Limits J R�Limit Flag Blank (7C12009-BLK1) Prepared: 03/12/07 11:15 Analyzed: 03/12/07 15:16 Mercury ND 0.00066 mglkg wet Laboratory Control Sample (7C12009-BSI) Prepared: 03112W 11.15 Analyzed: 03/12/07 15:18 Mercury 0.12425 0.00066 mgtkg wet 0.12500 99 90-112 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C12009-BSDI) Prepared: 03/12/07 11:15 Analyzed: 03112/07 15:20 Mercury 0.12550 Matrix Spike (7C12009-MS1) Prepared: 03/12107 11:15 Analyzed: 03/12/07 15:21 Mercury 0.20059 Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C12009-MSDI ) Prepared: 03/12/07 11:15 Analyzed: 03/12/07 15:23 Mercury 0,19041 0,00066 mgfkg wet 0.12500 100 90-112 1 Source: 0703141-05 0.00077 mg*gdr' 0-13691 0.06104 100 Source: 0703141-05 0.00070 mglkg dry 0-13260 0A6104 98 5 83-115 83-1 i 5 5 14 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.21.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories StateCertifcatians Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 fnelap) 400 W- Bethany Rd. Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma:8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 45 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Rev. 3 - Quality Control anah4arcl I Remit -Sol lnitc I Spike Le Source Result %REC) %REC Limits I RPD RPD � -Limit Flag _ ___ Blank (7C08030-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/08/07 13:30 TPH 1005 Extraction Completed NIA NIA TPH (C6-G12) NO 1.71 m9tkgwet TPH (>C12-C28) NO 2.60 mgncgw t TPH (>C28-C35) NO 4A7 mgtkg wet TPH (C6-C35) NO 8.77 mgtkg wet Surrogate: 1Chloroodane 290 m91k9 wet 252 115 70-130 Surrogate: o-rerphenyl 284 mgtkg wet 252 113 73-130 Laboratory Control Sample (7C08030-BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 03108/07 13:30 TPH 1005 Extraction Completed NIA NIA 0-0 TPH(C6-C12) 240 1.71 mglkgwet 200 120 79-123 TPH(>C12-C28) 496 2.60 m91k9wet 400 124 75-124 TPH (>C28-C35) 196 4.47 mg1k9 wet 150 131 75-125 C-01 TPH (C6-C35) 933 &77 m91kg wet 750 124 76-122 C-01 Surmgale: t-chloroactane 290 mg/kg wet 252 115 70-130 Surrogate: o-rerpheeyf 295 mgtkg wet 252 117 73-130 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C08030-BSDI) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/08/07 13:30 TPH 1005 Extraction Completed NIA NIA 0-0 0 TPH (G6-C12) 197 1.71 m9lk9-1 200 98 79-123 20 15 C-02 TPH (>C12 C28) 382 2-60 m9ft—t 400 96 75-124 26 15 C-02 TPH (>C28-C35) 149 4.47 mg/kg wet 150 99 75-125 27 20 C-02 TPH (C64--35) 728 &77 mgtk9wet 750 97 76-122 25 15 C-02 Surrogate: t-Chlorooctane 233 mglkg wet 252 92 70-130 surrogate: o-rnrphenyl 225 mgtkg wet 252 89 73-130 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-111406 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-EW41 FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State cations (nela Bethany Tech Center 4 Suite 190 Arkansaas:s: 88-0647 40>3 W- Bethany Rd. • Alien, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Shaw Environmental 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Report of Sample Analysis Page: page 46 of 47 Project: Cytec. Project #: 124883 Print Date/Time: 03/13/07 16:22 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Rev. 3 - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD RPG41it ( -Sol I Iinits I Level Resutt %REC I Limits I RPD I Limit] Flag Matrix Spike (7C08030-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/08/07 13:30 Source. 0703128-01 TPH 1005 Extraction Completed NIA N/A NO 0-0 TPH (C6-C12) 201 1.71 -09 wet 200 NO 100 75-125 TPH (>C12-C28) 381 2.60 mgAcgwet 400 NO 95 75-125 TPH (>028-C35) 149 4A7 mgAcgwet 150 2.21 98 75-125 TPH (C6-035) 731 8.77 mglkgwet 749 NO 98 75-125 Surrogate.- t-Cntomodane 235 mgncg wet 282 93 70-130 Surrogate.- o-Teiphenyl 223 mgAcg wet 282 88 73-130 Matrix Spike Duplicate (7008030-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03108/07 13:30 Source: 0703128-01 TPH 1005 Extraction Completed NIA NIA ND 0-0 TPH (C6-C12) 249 1.71 mglkg wet 200 ND 124 75-125 21 TPH (>C12-C28) 486 2.60 -ift-et 399 ND 122 75-125 24 TPH (>C28-C35) 195 4.47 mg" wet 150 2.21 129 75-125 27 TPH (C6-C35) 930 8.77 m9Ac9we1 749 ND 124 75-125 24 Surrogate- t-Chtomodane 293 mg*g wet 252 116 70-130 Sumrgate-a-Terphenyt 283 mg*gwet 252 112 73-130 0 20 C-02 20 C-02 20 C-01, C-02 20 C-02 TRRP Rpt 5 - v 2.5-111406 Local: (9721727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-MMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 1 �p 400 W. Bethany Rd. Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma-, 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 47 of 47 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatelTime: 03/13/07 16:22 Notes and Definitions The results presented in this report were generated using those methods given in 40 CFR Part 136 for Water and Wastewater samples and in SW-846 for RCRA/Solid Waste samples. C-01 The recovery is higher than expected. This has no effect on the data presented since this range had no concentration in the sample. C-02 The RPD is higher than expected. J This value is above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit. Q-02 The recovery of an analyte(s) in the MSs was outside the acceptable range due to interference, large dilutions required for analysis or a combination of these factors. The recovery of this analyte(s) in the LCSs was within the required limits. Q-04 The RPD of the target analyte(s) in the MSIMSD is outside of established limits. The RPD of this same analyte(s) in the LCSILCSD is within acceptable limits. Therefore, the data were reported and are acceptable- Q-14 The recovery was higher than expected. This may indicate a high bias to results presented. 0-15 The recovery was lower than expected. This may indicate a low bias to results presented ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis LCS/LCSD Laboratory Control Sample/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate MSIMSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD Relative Percent Difference mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/l milligrams per liter ug/kg micrograms per kilogram ug/l micrograms per liter exc Not covered under scope of NE=LAP accreditation. F* Calculated factor rounded to 3 significant figures. Concentration factor when <1.00 and dilution factor when >1.00. Inst Instrument Identification Anlst Analyst Initials SQL Sample Quantitation Limit MQL Method Quantitation Limit TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.6-1114M Local: (972` 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-EMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 ERM1 Environmental laboratories Laboratory Data Package Cover Page This data package for Laboratory Job Number 0703141 consists of: 0 This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data: Q R1 Field chain -of -custody documentation; ✓ R2 Sample identification cross-reference; ✓ R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes: a) Items consistent with NELAC 5.13 or ISOAEC 17025 Section 5.10 b) dilution factors, c) preparation methods, d) cleanup methods, and e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs). Q R4 Surrogate recovery data including: a) Calculated recovery (%R), and b) The labo(atory's surrogate QC limits. V R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples; ✓ R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including. a) LCS spiking amounts, b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and c) The laboratory's LCS QC limits. Q R7 Test reports for project matrix spikelmatrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including: a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified, b) MS/MSD spiking amounts, c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples, d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and e) The laboratory's MS/MSD QC limits Q R6 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision: a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate, b) the calculated RPD, and c) the laboratory's QC limits for analytical duplicates. ® ✓ R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix; ✓ R10 Other problems or anomalies. Q The Exception Report for every "No" or "Not Reviewed (NR)" item in laboratory review checklist. Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by the laboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached exception reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratory in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information or data have boon knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data. Check, if applicable: [ 1 This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person responding to rule_ The official signing the cover page of the rule-roquired report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release statement is true. Kendall K. Brown Name (Printed) Signature President 03/13107 Official Title (Printed) Date �M) LRC.Rpt 1001.a-1. f Page 1 of q:IFonn MasfefsV_RC.Rpt ERMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: ERMI Environmental Laboratories LRC Rate: 03/13/07 Project Name: Cytec Laboratory .lob Number 0703141 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc Prep Batch Number(s): 7C08030,7C09010,7C09030,7C09035,7C 09036, 7Ci 2001,7C 12009 # A` Description I Yes I No NA NR'j ER#' Rt 01 0466�9(twaifn I t l Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? X Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? 112 al -$rF vre and gLga*. rut [4C} {denldllutJun Are all held sample ED numbers crass -referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? X x Are all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the Corresponding QC data? X F13' CH' 1•out [QPar1A .. I Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? x Other than those results < MQL were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? x Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? X Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? X Were sample quantitation limits reported for all analyfes not detected? X Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? X Were %moisture (or solids} reported far all soil and sediment samples? x IF required for the project, TICS reported? X Were surrogates added prior to extraction? X Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC limits? X ru rn -.r cot repcnWj lmmwy Sand* 7Of PIMIR 44MFI[i f .. Were appropriate fype(s) of blanks analyzed? X Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, .cleanup procedures? X Were blank concentrations < MQL? X Rli:.'.-171 `vtoPYtaanlrol�arrrp�s�R' _. ',4ttii - Were all COCs included in the LCS? - X Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? X Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? X Were LCS {and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X E0 011 Does the delectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SQLs? X Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? X E002 {71 1etthl hp�lyd1(1 WP�.4+_ Were the projectimethod specified anaiytes included in the MS and MSD? — x 7 Were MSIMSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X Were MS (and MSD, it applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X E003 Were MSIMSD RPDs wahin laboratory QC limits? -- X E004 .< rd iJl'xwir:rlriY:fr Were appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? X Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? x 'R9 ,K]f-,•4���Ir17�p6.k}i.,;-_ �.—=-f,z�-:�ni�-t�- '' - _r�'s�$`s*i %�','• . Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? X Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? x Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? X R11z }'3�1.fJJN titq:iWatra(xiioritntles _ - Are all known problemslanornalieslspecial conditions noted in this LRC and ER? X Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? X Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SQL to minimize the matrix interference affects on the sample results? x 1. flans ida.tiW by the !e!!er'Yi' must be included i, the laboraru,ydara pad ge—bnaered in the TTIHP-required report(,)- Items identified by the retler'S' sh—ld 6e retah,cd a,d made -.&*I. Ypnn !aquas[ Inc the apprepdW. ret.,dion period. 2. O =organic anayses; r = iuorj—k .—lyres (and general chemistry• when aWf-ble); LRC.Rpt-1001.0-1. i Page 2 of 4 (�M DI Q Form MastersV-RC.Rpt 3 NA = Not appiipbre; 4- NR = Not reviewed; S. ERN = Exception Report idemibclion number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item If "NR' or "No' is dreda d). ERMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: EMI Environmental t-aboratories LRC Date: 03/13/07 Project Name: Cytec Laborator Job 0703141 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc Prep Batch Number(s): 7C08030,7C09010,7C09030,7C09035,7C 09036,7C12001,7C12009 W A' Description yes No NA' NR' Ene 4 Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC timits? X Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? X Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analyses? X Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate the curve? X Are ICAL data available far all instruments used? X Has the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? X ❑t Fnrfinlandrxti'111rirAnj�aalmrattpnl+�riliCaUon{IY.)±•n- p1i11fYIM9sri4Aaio ... t - Was the CCV analyzed at the method -required frequency? X Were percent differences for each analyte within the method -required QC limits? X Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? X Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB < MDL? 53 .0. MOSIA �t� Lml tuning; - Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning?El X X Were ion abundance data within the method -required QC limits? X _ Il $A O rnt„rrplstAp ,hats Were IS area counts and retention limes within the method -required QC limits? I X� SIN W idori 1 ippond4 A Ylp�eaf.Yi $'8 g4`$.1. ar ISCI�I C:171325 ue�Flon Were the raw data (for example, chromatograms, spectral data) reviewed by an analyst? X I Were data associated with manual integrations flagged on the raw data? X I} "O:=btie op+rmncgaYrrt�igl�op J, r" [Did dual column confirmation results meet the metf tod-required QC? � �I TnIF � sr"{'.--�'n:;T_�frtrl.lafYpiei;Irnr�JeoplP'1M.�f t�rpt�.,' If TICS were requested, were the mass spectra and TIC data subject to appmpriate chocks? X i f :69.< 1 , Infernlranrre Cfr+3Gk.Fw'InPlotlt�l roeuNs:' - ��-.' "" .. -I - . Were percent recoveries within method QC limits? X `S� ',': i `Sitiol dliLltfnll'><F'cx{ dtga9ltwropfkis+tlrYd._'O3)P f "per"ypW���� Were percent differences, recoveries, and the linearity within the QC limits specified in the method? X F f T t,01 S1[1 ire. ddPfcatfonllllLil.PbL)ilittlfVt _ Was a MDL study performed for each reported analyte? X Is the MDL either adjusted or supported by the analysis of DCSs? X ':fif1 C71 t'roElaltire.(i4�tSeparl�: Was the faboratorys performance acceptable on the applicable. proficiency tests or evaluation studies? X .Stx or , wrldardr.dipf;umoalalron Are all standards used in the analyses NEST -traceable or obtained from other appropriate Sources? X "S! _¢I CorrtpourLdf#nH[yyeIdelYliToeaFJart prpegdrlf'rili r,rf r;•l-r _ _ — - ,.. -, ry-.;.>•; �. ,"--`� �• Are the procedures for compotmdlanafyte identification documented? X `Zld .' lot r7 - 'Detrl�retrovQ1 pl rtl!A Rf �}I7ikwrK1'AWC}d. J— Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISOAEC 4? X Is documentation of the analyses competency up-lo-date and on file? X :Sj6_ Ud Erlljeoli4r�+}fijMilfonis5irr,rr+5117hia�d►11.1}griRNftnf;Cllali6_efF{jflE_1i_#7�.ktaii - t-•. +-`I-'i Are aid the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, where applicable? I X T Are laboratory SOPS current and on file for each method performed? I X I F 1 Mean identified by tl.e lenor'R' —lb, rneprdad in lbe laboratory data package subrnibed b thn TRRP-required report(,). hand iderpir d by the fetter--- ibould be retained and made available upon request fur the apprcl,"e mrenrion period. 2. O = -tonic analyses; 1 = n..g nic analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable): 3 NA Prot applicable; 4, NR = Not reviewed; 5 ER# -Exception nepod kkntirxation number (an, Exceplion Repnrl should be completed form Rem if'hi W at-W bt chedked) LRC.Rpt-1001.0-1A Page 3 of (��M:D Q:ItForm Masterslt-RC.Rpt ERMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Excention Renortc Laboratory Name: ERMI Environmental Laboratories LAG Date: 03/13/O7 Project Name: Cytec Laboratory Job 0703141 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc Prep Batch Number(s): 7C08030,7C09010,7CO9030,7C09035,7C 09036,7C 12001,7C 12009 Eftrr' Desoription E001 LCS Recovery for TPH (>C28-C35) (131%) was outside acceptance limits {75 125) in 7C08030-BSI for TPH 1005-Non PST - The recovery is higher than expected. This has no effect on the data presented since this range had no concentration in the sample. LCS Recovery for TPH (C6-C35) (124%) was outside acceptance limits (76-122) in 7C08030-BS 1 for TPH 1005 Non PST - The recovery is higher than expected. This has no effect on the data presented since this range had no concentration in the sample. E002 LCS Duplicate APO for TPH (>C12-C28) (26%) was above the acceptance limit (15) in 7008030-13SOI for TPH 1005 Nan PST - The APO is higher than expected. LCS Duplicate APO for TPH (>C28-C35) (27%) was above the acceptance limit (20) in 7C08030-BSD 1 for TPH 1005 Non PST - The RPD is higher than expected. LCS Duplicate RPD for TPH (C6-C12) (20%) was above the acceptance limit (15) in 7C08030-BSOI for TPH 1005 Non PST - The RPD is higher than expected. LCS Duplicate RPD for TPH (C6-C35) (25%) was above the acceptance limit (15) in 7C08030-13SD1 for TPH 1005 Non PST - The RPD is hi her than expected, E003 Matrix Spike Recovery for TPH (>C28-C35) (130%) was outside acceptance limits (75-125) in 7C0t3030-MSDi for TPH 1005 Non PST - The recovery is higher than expected. This has no effect on the data presented since this rango had no concentration in the sample. Matrix Spike Recovery for Vanadium (139%) was outside acceptance limits (75-125) in 7C09010-MSDi for V Total ICP 6010B - The recovery of an analyte(s) in the MSs was outside the acceptable range due to interference, large dilutions required for analysis or a combination of these factors. The recovery of this analyte(s) in the LCSs was within the required limits. - The recovery was higher than expected. This may indicate a high bias to results presented - Matrix Spike Recovery for Lead (-2740%) was outside acceptance limits (75-t 18) in 7012001-MSI for Pb Total ICP 60108 - The recovery of an analyte(s) in the MSs was outside the acceptable range due to interference, large dilutions required for analysis or a combination of these factors. The recovery of this analyte(s) in the LCSs was within the required limits. - The recovery was lower than expected. This may indicate a law bias to results presented. Matrix Spike Recovery for Lead (2730%) was outside acceptance limits (75-118) in 7CI2001-MSD1 for Pb Total ICP 601013 - The recovery of an analyte(s) in the MSs was outside the acceptable range due to interference, large dilutions required for analysis or a combination of these factors. The recovery of this analyte(s) in the LCSs was within the required limits. The recoverwas lower than ex ed. This ma indicate a low bias to results resented. E004 Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD for TPH (>Cl2-C28) (24%) was above the acceptance limit (20) in 7C08030-MSD1 for TPH 1005 Nan PST - The RPD is higher than expected. Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD for TPH (>C26-C35) (27%) was above the acceptance limit (20) in 700803O-MSD1 for TPH 1005 Non PST - The RPD is higher than expected. Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD for TPH (C6-Cl2) (21%) was above the acceptance limit (20) in 7C06030-MSDI [or TPH 1005 Non PST - The RPD is higher than expected. Matrix Spike Duplicate APO for TPH (C6-C35) (241/.) was above the acceptance limit (20) in 7C08030-MSD 1 for TPH 1005 Nan PST - The RPD is higher than expected. Matrix Spike Duplicate APO tar Nickel (19%) was above the acceptance limit (18) in 7C09010-MSDi for Ni Total ICP 6010E - The RPD of the target analyte(s) in the MS/MSD is outside of established limits. The APO of this same analyto(s) in the LCS/LCSD is within acre table limits. Therefore, the data were reported and are accentable. I. ERA' = EH eWion Report idendre-alion number tan EKeeption Report sIvuW t—mpreted far an kem K Tlrr oc-ro is checked on the treC) IRC.RpF1001.0-1.1 Page 4 of 4 E Q. V76rm 1NasterslLRC.Rpt w IL rn N :� Ml 0 l'I CD ca 0 -W U) 0 L Fk, r_ N_ Q J ,ky) CL E E E E COE uj tv) Et7co in 0 IL EC(f CV"E W 0 A C E E -Soo/ .... . . . . ....... CL E r1i tiY U) > m in Im L: ... ........ ...... (D (D 0) 0) (D 4) (D a) 4) a) (D f E 4) E a) a. NM .-.- -. cc uj rz 0 L) z o 0 L N U- a Nu- N 4t 0 ut F- X ID cL 4U 0 10 t> iti iLD (D g E PG - is d) '16 010101 U) (If CD '(g 16 oil rZ d; — ]�.g - ; CkI O cig d) CR mC4 L: ci Iz CD E :3 z E CD od -2 C CL N r- CL CA r_ cm J_- Q. r- (n 0 -0 ul 5 m ca 0 fL a. < (D 4) (D wl tn{ OII s Lab -Number(s): 76s: S ERMI Sample Preservation Documentation Oct ice (Circle One): OR NO (check if on Dry fee_ 1 Parameters C ontaners Required Preservation Sample Circle pH Metals # Size Container Note an discre anc pH < 2 Glass or pH < 2 Dissolved Metals Unpreserved prior to being Plastic Glass or fittered, Cool 40 C Plastic Semlvolatiles, Cool 40 C Glass only Pesticides, PCBs, Herf�icides with Teflon lid Chlorine ayes ono VOA (B 1 E7CC, Cool 4° C, pH < 2 40 ml VOA vial - - UFME, 624, 8260, Zero Head Space TPH-GRO VOA (TPH-1005) Cool 4-- C, 40 m[ VOA vial Zero Head Space Please check if collected in re-wei hed vials Phos:, NOI/N%. Glass or PH < 2 NHA COD, Cool 4' C, pH < 2 Plastic TKN,TOC TDS, SOD, Cool 40 C Glass or - CBOO, Cond, pH, Plastic, Plastic TSSr F. W" -Cr' I only "if F Cl, AQ5 Sulfite PherYols, TPH-DRO Glass only 00.-< :2 Cool 40 C, pH < 2 Teflon lid Oil & Grease, Foil lid TPH (by 1664a) Cool 4' C, pH < 2 Glass only Teflon lid Cyanide Poll, lid Glass or PH > 12 Cool 4' C, pH >12 Plastic Chlorine Gees Clao Sulfide Cool 4' C, PH> 9 Glass or Sulfide Qyes ono ona H > 9 - Bacwa . Coo! 4a C (_ . - foil&ilge; ,,L a� Cool 4- C Soli" "[ rc Note: please check if Oil, Liquid n� �o collected i re -weighed rC vials_ CO t WENT& '*Ugs form is' Used to document sample preservation. Circle parameter requested_ Fill in number and size of containers received. Check pH (adjust if needed) and note if different from what is required and make a notation of any samples not received on ice. Note any incorrect sample containers or preservation on chain - of custody. -Preservatlon Checked By 3 -9-07 1 Z�[7 Date Time -1000_0-3 C .� tl_1Form mast=t My tJaroe Sarr+ple Preservation Form I OW 0-3 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center + Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W- Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page i of 7 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Project M 124883 Print Date[Time: 04/02/07 16:21 L ol Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas- T104704232-06-TX Attached is our analytical report for the samples received for your project. Below is a list of your individual sample descriptions with our corresponding laboratory number_ We also have enclosed a copy of the Chain of Custody that was received with your samples and a form documenting the condition of your samples upon arrival. Please note any unused portion of the samples may be discarded upon expiration of the EPA holding time for the analysis performed or after 30 days from the above report date, unless you have requested otherwise. ERMI Environmental laboratories certifies that all results contained in this report were produced in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) unless otherwise noted. The results presented apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain -of -custody document(s) furnished with the samples- This report is intended for the sole use of the customer for whom the work was performed and must be reproduced, without modification, in its entirety. Sample Identification Laboratory ID # Client Sample ID Matrix Sampled DatelTime Received DatelTime 0703554-01 GP-616 (2-3') Solid 03/05/07 09:26 03/28107 20:27 0703554-02 GP-816 (3-4') Solid 03/05/07 09:27 03/28107 20:27 0703554-03 GP-816 (6-T) Solid 03/05/07 09.29 03/28/07 20:27 Thank you for the opportunity to serve your environmental chemistry analysis needs. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report please contact our Customer Service Department at the phone number below. Respectfully submitted, Kendall K_ Brown President 1"RRP Rpt 5- v.2.5-032Z61 Local: (972) 727-1123 tong Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications �pellap] Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 6727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 2 of 7 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 04/02/07 1621 Laboratory ID 9: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703554-01 Grab Solid !Nike Franco Samole Description GP-616 (2-T) Sample Datef ime_ 03/05/07 0926 Analyte(s) Result SDL MQL Units P I Inst ` Batch I Analysis DatelTime IAnlst_ _Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 82 0.01 0.01 % 1_00 7C30030 03/30/07 1700 PJA exc,S-14 Metals (Total), EPA 3050E Acid Digestion or Completed hllA N/A NIA 49.02 7C30006 03/29/07 1600 SQS Sfudges7SOW; Metals (Total), EPA 6010E Molybdenum 104 0.227 0.593 mglkg dry 0.98 M3 7C30006 03/30/07 1228 SPS 7RRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-o32707 Local: (972) 727-1123 Lang Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1176 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications 111a E =RM Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma- 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas:T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 3 of 7 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project M 124883 ATTN. Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 04/02/07 16:21 Laboratory ID 9: Sample Type Matrix Sample Collected By Customer 0703554-02 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-616 (34) Sample Date/time 03/05/07 0927 Analysis Anal te(s) Result I SDL ! MQL Units F` I Inst I Batch I Datefrime JAnlst I Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 83 0.01 Q01 % 1.00 7C30030 03130/07 1700 PJA exc,S-14 Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Add Digestiarl of Compteted NIA NIA NIA 48.54 7C30006 03/29/07 1600 SDS Sludges/Solids Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Molybdenum 61.9 0.225 0,593 mg/kg dry 0.97 M3 7C30006 031301071235 SPS TRRP Rpt 5 - v. 2. "327D7 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERM1 FAX: (972) 727-1176 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center 4 Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 iV 400 W. Bethany Rd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page_ Page 4 of 7 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 04/02/07 16.21 Laborato ID #: Sample Type Matrix Sample Coilected By Customer 0703554-03 Grab Solid Mike Franco Sample Description GP-816 (6-7') Sample Date/Time 03/05/07 0929 Analysis Analyte(s) Result SDL MQL Units F* I,lnst Batch Date/Time JAnlst I Flag Conventional Chemistry Parameters, SM 254OG % Solids 85 0.01 0.01 ova 1.00 7C30030 03130/07 1700 PJA exc.S-14 Metals (Total), EPA 3050B Acid DigesLon of Completed NIA N/A NIA 48.54 7C30006 03/29/07 1600 SOS SludgesfSolids Metals (Total), EPA 6010B Molybdenum 40-1 0.219 0.593 mgtkg dry 097 M3 7C30006 03/30107 1239 SPS TRRP Rpf 5 - e.2.5-032707 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 88-0647 (nelaD 400 W. Bethany Rd_ • Allen, Texas 7SO13 Oklahoma_ 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 5 of 7 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print DatetTime: 04/02/07 16:21 Conventional Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD AnalvtPW I R utrI -'SDI I Inits ! _Level Result ( %REC I Limits j RPD Limit --I--_ -Flag- ... Blank (7C30030-BLKi) Prepared & Analyzed: 03130/07 17:00 % Solids ND 0.01 % Dupficate (7C30030-DUP 1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03130/07 17:00 Source: 0703554-01 % Solids 84 0.01 % 82 2 3.5 TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-032707 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 400 W. Bethany lid. • Allen, Texas 75013 Shaw Environmental 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, TX 75063 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm State Certifications Arkansas: 88-0647 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Page: Page 6 of 7 Project: Cytec Project #: 124883 Print Date/Time: 04/02/07 16:21 (Metals (Total) - Quality Control Spike Source %REC RPD -AgBjY 0 f � ut *Snl I Inftc Level Result %REC I Limits I J RPD I Limit I Flag Blank(7C30006-BLKI) -- Prepared & Analyzed: 03/29/07 16:00 Acid Digestion of 5ludgeslSofids Completed NIA NIA Molybdenum ND 0.186 m9tkg Wet Laboratory Control Sample (7C30006-BS7) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/29/07 16:00 Acid Digestion of sludgesrsorids Completed NIA NIA Molybdenum 46-1 0.186 mg/kg wet 50.0 Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (7C30006-13SD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/29107 16:00 Add Digestion or SludgeslSoRds Completed NIA NIA Molybdenum 48.2 ^ 0.186 mglkg wet 50.0 Matrix Spike (7C3o006-M51) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/29/07 16:00 Add Digestion of SludgeslSo5ds Completed NIA NIA Molybdonum 163 0.227 mglkg dry 592 Matrix Spike Duplicate (7C30006-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/29/07 16:00 Acid Digestion of5ludgeslSolids Completed Molybdenum 174 NIA NIA 0.227 m91kg dry 59.8 0-0 92 91-111 0-0 0 96 91-111 4 Source: 0703554-01 ND 0-0 104 100 75-124 Source: 0703554-01 NO 0-0 104 117 75-124 7 0 18 TRRF Rpt 5 - v.2.5-032707 Local: (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-ERMI FAX: (972) 727-1175 Environmental Laboratories State Certifications Bethany Tech Center • Suite 190 Arkansas: 8MB47 (pell 400 W. BethanyRd. • Allen, Texas 75013 Oklahoma: 8727 Louisiana: 02007 Kansas: E-10288 Texas: T104704232-06-TX Report of Sample Analysis Shaw Environmental Page: Page 7 of 7 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Project: Cytec Irving, TX 75063 Project #: 124883 ATTN: Kenneth Tramm Print Date/Time: 04/02/07 1621 Notes and Definitions The results presented in this report were generated using those methods given in 40 CFR Part 136 for Water and Wastewater samples and in SW-846 for RCRA/Solid Waste samples. S-14 This analysis was performed outside the recommended holding time. This analysis is used only for dry weight calculation and is representative of the total solids present in the sample at the time the dry weight corrected analyses were performed. ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis LCSILCSD Laboratory Control Sample/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD Relative Percent Difference mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/l milligrams per liter ug/kg micrograms per kilogram ug/I micrograms per liter exc Not covered under scope of NELAP accreditation. F` Calculated factor rounded to 3 significant figures. Concentration factor when <1.00 and dilution factor when >1.00. Inst Instrument Identification Anlst Analyst Initials SDL Sample Detection Limit MQL Method Quantitation Limit TRRP Rpt 5 - v.2.5-032707 Local (972) 727-1123 Long Distance: (800) 228-EFtM1 FAX: (972) 727-1175 EIRMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Data Package Cover Page This data package for Laboratory Job Number 0703554 consists of: 0 This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data: n R1 Field chain -of -custody documentation; ✓ R2 Sample identification cross-reference; ✓ R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes: a) items consistent with NELAC 5.13 or ISOIIEC 17025 Section 5.10 b) dilution factors, c) preparation methods, d) cleanup methods, and e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICS). �✓ R4 Surrogate recovery data including: a) Calculated recovery (%R), and b) The laboratory's surrogate QC limits. 8✓ R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples; R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including: a) LCS spiking amounts, b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and c) The laboratory's LCS QC limits. Q R7 Test reports for project matrix spikelmatrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including: a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified, b) MS/MSD spiking amounts, c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples, d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and e) The laboratory's MS/MSD QC limits F/ F18 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision: a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate, b) the calculated RPD, and c) the laboratory's OC limits for analytical duplicates. V R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) for each analyte for each method and matrix; ❑✓ Ri0 Other problems or anomalies. Q The Exception Report for every "No" or "Not Reviewed (NR)" item in laboratory review checklist. Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This data package has been reviewed by the laboratory and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached exception reports_ By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data, have been identified by the laboratory in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information or data have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data. Check, if applicable: [ j This laboratory is an in-house laboratory controlled by the person responding to rule_ The official signing the cover page of the rule -required report (for example, the APAR) in which these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release statement is true. Kendall K. Brown 4""`'� President Name (Printed) Signature 04/02/07 Official Title (Printed) Date LRC.Rpt-1001.0-1. t Page t o1`4 QlForm MastersV_RC. Rpt ERtM I Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: S MII Environmental Laboratories LR Date: 04l02107 Pra-ect Name: Cytec Laboratory Job Number 0703554 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc Prep Balch Number(s): 7C30006,7C30030 1F` A` Description Yes No NA` NR� ER! -- j Did samples meet the laboratory's standard conditions of sample acceptability upon receipt? Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? X — fit 41 -13dri.13%o and gtro!1ty P9111mF(Qq)d4nzrfImlian Are all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory 10 numbers? X Are all laboratory lO numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? X X E001 P--I OI 1841 MfMW11t — Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? Other than those results < MOL, were all other raw values bracketed by calibration standards? X Were calculations checked by a peer or supervise(? X Were all analyze identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? X Were sample quanfitafion limits reported for all analytes not detected? X Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? X Y Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? X It required for the project, i1Cs reported? X FTA Q.Sirrt'O9'alazricvY(trj+�aln _ _ - Were surrogates added prior to extraction? T Y x Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC limits? _ X H3 bi ` if4EFRfl?Iti446ffl1l ry fond I fiw Hid ilk gain pfnd . Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? X - Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? x Were blank concentrations < MQL? Ivi 01 Lal eotr+rY control ar,rgpka Were all COCs included in the LCS? X x Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and cleanup steps? X Were LCSs analyzed at rho required frequency? x Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X Does the detectability data document the laboratory's capability to detect the COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SDLs? X Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? x lfmTlii;po*(l1)rnu�zlSAlttSat#llikwkltr{�Ilcale[#A�a)dotu _- -• Were the proiecflmethod specified analytes included in the MS and MSD? x Were MSJMSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? x Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X Were MS/MSD RPOs within laboratory QC limits? X Ra QI�FItr�lloit�tta�rduti' - - - Ware appropriate analyfical duplicatesanalyzedfor each matrix? X Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X rs Were}RPDs relative -standard within the laboratory QC limits? x Your �deviations .`J.Qtrb�YxWli�fY}IltrllRil�t'!'t�!ii �+tislli��;i y�Y !~ �F Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? x Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non -zero calibration standard? X Are unadjusted MQLs included in the laboratory data package? X t.-.,. ,. ,.- -. - _ - RIo ' #7l. {l�1tYrfxt�i� il�ilryogn�lkr� i..d�j , _4 z Are all known problemsfanomaliesh;pecial conditions noted in this LAO and ER? X Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? X Was applicable and available technology used to lowerthe SDL to minimize the matrix interference affects on the sam le results? X r. nerns nenmred n y me rener -tt- nos[ be nchrded in Me labbrarory data patlmga submitted in the TRrtP-required repo ffs). Items idengtied by the letler 5' al—M be relamed and made avarlahle upon request nor the appropriate retention period. z 0=organic arraly;es:l=uwrgad6c anatyses(ar.d general dreanistry, when applicable): 3. Nr1 Idol apptrabW 4- MR = Nat reviewed: LRC.Rpf-1001.0-1. i page 2 of 4 ffPX�D Q:1Form Masferstf-RC.Rpt 5. ERii = Exception Repoli iden[� flan nvnther {an Exr�plien Report should be mmpleled For an Rem it TlR' or'No' is checkedi. ERMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data Laboratory Name: EMI Environmental Laboratories LRC Date: 04/02/07 Project Name: Cytec Labora!qg Job 0703554 Reviewer Name_ Michelle LeBlanc Prep Batch Number(s): 7C30006,7C30030 #` A' Description I Yes I No I NA` NA' ER#' _ Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC limits? X Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? X Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? X Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate the cutve? X Are LCAL data available for all instruments used? X Has the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source standard? X 57 op fnpitilttod . nuf� oollea�kl.?n.+'nritleatlaA_{{{'4`YandCfi jATO t=trnlluulno rallbtpjian. Y - _ yA ; - I.'. _..� Was the CCV analyzed at the method -required frequency? X Were percent differences for each analyle within the method -required QC limits? X Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? X Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB c MOL? X ..G'II � .b11was#P.4'clr+ftLning; _ _ . Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning? Were ion abundance data within the method -required OC limits? X riY If�Ert'Ipi �lt�tt�ius ll �J1- - _. _-- Were IS area counts and retention times within the method -required OC limits? X Qtzf-@MEC-tl_CyncWon tapptend71i4 Cal r.cod.eclfon-112ptl$'IEDl> aeeildn Were the raw data (for example, chromatograms, spectral data) reviewed by an analyst? X Were data associated with manual integrations flagged on the raw data? X sg- --, U 40l cclumri a xifli oi4tlron - - _. Did dual column confirmation results meet the method -required QC? - - - - — - - X•_3 _... =93 -.''truftli*y j1 e"Qiad UMpmueda MCaJ.. It TICS were requested, were the mass spectra and TIC data subject to appropriate checks? 1 r I rX-1 1 1 ..'� 1 IrrtLY�r�Ylt`r61tp�e{ICSjrc6ulis= .-- .-- ---__ __ - . Were percent recoveries within method QC limits? X -'^c9 I.10411flRlorir�padtdtgct9fq'dplkee,ur.dlnctllodol.vlanatnidadd�llolaR Were percent differences, recoveries, and the Linearity within the QC limits specified in the method? X Was a MDL study performed for each reported analyte? Is the MDL either adjusted or supported by the analysis of DCSs? X Sft JD' 1'f.I'I:;Ji'r' L_sl;up-j; ICI' . Was the laboratory's performance acceptable on the applicable proficiency tests or evaluation stories? X l:st� `'.�f ;�lnititfar�e4oalirno %y.,'.� , Ate alb standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other appropriate sources? - X ' 61'3.r QL Gamriairndfanal}r[g�deR110c6dali�ptvleel7llraa _ .{{. _ _ _ _ _ =-_1 Are the procedures for compoundlanalyte identification documented? 3 X T 1 i#Y4 .'OI t7�1 n6tre[lue,clrt+et.pMkrt�+�tP{D_i Was DOC conducted consistent with NEL AC Chapter 5C or ISOAEC 4? X Is documentation of the analyst's competency up-to-date and on file? X '515 DI L'elInca. tjgiiN4ldMfon ai kiimmloLlmt iorrtwthodF.jWLAOi'F.op Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated, where applicable? X � j$--T_oI L+i�Albrlylv`peeld FI�r9 prace.fnirele5oai: —1 _ r 1 Are laboratory SOPS current and on fife for each method performed? FX��I 1 1. dams idastdied by the rener'R' must be } luded it tie labara" dale pxle ga sa6uuhled'n the iRRPwegeired reW(.)- dams identified by he retler 5' M—ld t retained and made arahahie upon request Iw the appropriate reterdion period. 1 O = organic anaryses; l = rnorgarAcanaryses (arid general chemistry. when epplirablel: S- NA=Mot eppli-ble: 4- NR-Nat reviewed; S. ERr = Exception Repod identdre dki number (an Exception Repod should be canpleted rot m Item if'NR- w -No is cho*edl- LRC.Rpt-1001.0-1.1 Page 3 of 4 (�O Q: iForm MasfersV RC Rpt ERMI Environmental Laboratories Laboratory Review Checklist: Exception Reports Laboratory Name: EMI Environmental Laboratories LRC Date: 04102/07 Project Name: cytec Laboratory Job 0-103554 Reviewer Name: Michelle LeBlanc Prep Balch Number(s): 7C30006r7C30030 ERN * Geseription E001 Sample 0703554-01 failed hold criteria for Dry Weigh[ 2540G. Sampled = 03/05/07 09:26 Prepared = OX30/07 17:00 Analyzed = 03/30/07 17-00 Sampled ->Analyzed > 7.00 days Sample 0703554-02 failed hold criteria for Dry Weight 2WG. Sampled = 03/05/07 09:27 Prepared = 03/30107 17:00 Analyzed = 03/30/07 17:00 Sampled ->Analyzed > 7.00 days Sample 0703554-03 failed hold criteria for Dry Weight 2540G. Sampled = 03/05/07 09:29 Prepared = 03/30/07 17:00 Analyzed = 03IM07 17.00 Sam led ->Anal ed > 7.00 days 1. ERp = Exception Report IdwIfficabon number( Exception Report st—W be o-VI ted far - A— R"Nfr checked on the LAC) LRC.Rpt f 00i.04-1 Page 4 of 4 Q'IForm MasfersV RC.Rpf Page IofI Shelly Connelly From: Tramm, Kenneth [kenneth.tramm@shawgrp_comj Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:27 PM To: custserv@ermilab_com Cc: Holub, Allen; Knight, Kyle Subject: Run Metals - Rush Hello, Please go took in the freezer for this March 5, 2007 job. ERMI # 0703140 need to run the GP B16 samples for 24, 3-4' land 6-7' far Molybdenum on Rush! Thanks, 6 f{ 2 -3 k C7 `7 iD kt ep bli,' 3-y' D7o3ssy-0� Kenneth S. Tramm, PhD, PG, CHMM B I ks. (0- D7 0 -,)5:5 y , 03 Program Manager Shaw Environmental, Inc. 6330 Commerce Drive, Suite 190 Irving, Texas 75063 214-277-7814 Direct 817-690-4356 Cell C 214-277-8600 Fax J www.shawgrp.com ****Internet Email Confidentiality Footer**** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of The Shaw Group Inc. or its subsidiaries shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. The Shaw Group Inc. http://www.shawgrp.com 3/29/2007 ml Q3� O O 2 V) M E E 6 .tu Ja- Co r— N m 7 [9 d7 r mr r m N N Y Q m(V N m -tQm CD N_ x RI.O .F12 7.1 4) m [L G) r- T-! 0-1 d' CV r] mI 0 0� I Cd a. ALJ U $ N CL m O ui V) k] d� t i (j } w n n w - 0. lcy Z d9-eS �4� = C2 N dL v (P a E m U) U c p +� CO In In v _ ! U u W : W G- a m (D oC oc it CC Ld a E a -. � CL ,o o m U d x Uz m U �, �. CDF -M iv p1 u iv N U- i N yc q m E E cD E .m m .y a 2 �{ CL � m � m m C4 - C � a � ddd .m �] g 0 E M V N -xrc� a C L: m y NA 2 0 .� Y_ rD ii91.1 `` ` f.' 4 tA w W Co CO a..- Q. � N CD 7 0 'p G N c - Mn N Ncc O c le m C C C t Odd 0v ma- a a 0 U a) 4) Ccc�QO L,al;-Number(s):"— ERMI Sample Preservation Documentation Om ice (Circle anc : �IvR NO (deck if on Dry Cce j r Parameters Containers Required Preservation Sample Circle pH it Size Con( finer Note an discr ans metals pH < 2 Glass or PH < 2 Plastic Dissolved Metals Unlxeserved prior to being Glass or filtered, Cool 4" C Plastic Semlvatatiles, Cool 4' C Glass only Pesticides, PCBs, with Teflon lid Chlorine ayes Ciao HeObk:fdes VOA (QTEY, -Coo14- C, pH < 2 40 ml VOA vial 14T8E; 624, 8260, Zero Head Space TPH-GRO 40 ml YOA vial VOA Cool 4.. C, (TPH-1005) Zero Head Space Please check if collected in re svei tied vials or pH < 2 Phos- NO,/No,Glass COD, ©= stool 41 C, pH < 2 Plastic TKf1,TOC TQS. HOD, Cool 4" C Glass or C800T Cow, pH, Plastic, Plastic TssrF, SUa, ce% only if F Cl Sitlfife Glass only p Phecwts, TPH-0RO Cool 4' C, pH < 2 Teflon lid Foil lid Oil & Grease, Glass only TPH (by 1664a) Cool 4' C, pH < 2 Teflon liii_— Foif lid__ Glass or p Cyanide Cool 4' C, pH >12 Plastic Chlorine ayes Ono S[t fide Cool V G,'pH > 9 GIA or s - -:P u - Steele Cup Sari, Judge, tip l% Cool 40 C r l Note: please check it Oil, Liquid 5 ¢ ". collected in pre hed vials COMMENTS: . 60 bcoKt„ .t rt 4-rin si' . 'Ms foam -is used to dowment sample preservation- Circle parameter requested. �Fiii in number and size of containers received. Check pH (adiust if needed) and note if different from what is required and make a nofaWn of any samples not received on ice. Note any incorrect sample containers or preservation on chain - of custody. 19 (to :Pt eservation Checked oyAoAal;.1AC 3 - 7-197 Is Date 3- 7-p 7 kAY i!MG IOQO fl 3 CrW 3wm Mastersl Sample Preservation Form ioo0-4 3 Exhibit E Cost -Cutting Requirements Cost -Cutting Requirements Economic and Miscellaneous Authorities Debarment and Suspension, Executive Order 12549 • Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966, Pub. L. 89-754, as amended, o Executive Order 12372 • Procurement Prohibitions under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act and Section 508 of the Clean Water Act, including Executive Order 11738, Administration of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with Respect to Federal Contracts, Grants, or Loans • Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Pub. L. 91-646, as amended • Davis Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-D and 42 U.S.C. 3222) Social Policy Authorities • Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Pub. L. 94-135 • Anti -Lobbying Provisions (40 C.F.R. Part 30) • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88-352 • Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 327-333) and the Anti - Kickback Acts, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276 c), (18 U.S.C. 874) • Section 13 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. 92-500 (the Clean Water Act) • The Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-690 (applies only to the capitalization grant recipient) • Equal Employment Opportunity, Executive Order 11246 40 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-112 (including Executive Orders 11914 and 11250) • Section 129 of the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-590 • Women's and Minority Business Enterprise, Executive Orders 11625, 12138 and 12432 BCRLF-BLG Northside Properties Execution Copy cr104.25.07v2 Pagel of 3 City of Fort Worth, Texas COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 1/18/2007 DATE: Thursday, January 18, 2007 LOG NAME: 52BLGCYTECBCRLF REFERENCE NO.: C-21938 SUBJECT: Authorize Execution of a Loan Agreement with BLG Northside Development, L.P., to Borrow from the Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund for the Environmental Cleanup of Approximately 33 Acres Located at 600 North ,tones Street; Amend M&C G-13129 to Provide that the City May Act as Fund Manager; and Authorize Execution of Related Amendment to Lease Agreement and Option to Purchase (City Secretary Contract No. 33411) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with BLG Northside Development, L.P., allowing it to borrow $800,000 from the city's Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund for the environmental cleanup of the former American Cyanamid (Cytec) site located at 600 North Jones Street; 2. Amend M&C G-13129 to allow the City to act as Fund Manager for the Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Lease Agreement and Option to Purchase (City Secretary Contract No. 33411) with regard to the Cytec property between the City and BLG Northside Development, L.P. to provide than no option may be exercised if a default exists under the loan agreement. DISCUSSION: In 2001, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) awarded a $1 million Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund (BCRLF) grant to the City of Fort Worth to allow the City to make loans for the environmental cleanup of Brownfield sites to qualified borrowers. Pursuant to federal regulations, interest charged on the loans must be at or below the prime interest rate. The grant application and acceptance was authorized by City Council on January 16, 2001 (M&C G-13129). BLG Northside Development L.P., a Texas limited partnership, acting through Carl W. Bell, President of BLG Northside Properties, LLC, its general partner, has requested an $800,000 loan from the fund for the cleanup of a portion of the former American Cyanamid site located at 600 North Jones Street, in COUNCIL DISTRICT 2. This will be the City's first loan under the BCRLF program. The site is currently owned by the City and BLG is a tenant with an option to purchase the property under City Secretary Contract No. 33411 within a specified period of time. It is located in the Trinity Uptown area and is generally bounded by N.E. 6th Street to the north, North Commerce Street to the west, Tarrant County College to the south and the Trinity River to the east. It is situated in a commercial/industrial area. The site covers approximately 33 acres and is vacant of structures. A large portion of the site has been paved to provide parking for Tarrant County jurors and for Cats' games. The site was first developed in the early 1940s to manufacture petroleum -refining catalyst for World War II. The Defense Plant Corporation owned the property until 1946 when American Cyanamid took over http://www.cfwnet.org/council_packet/Reports/mc_print.asp 5/2/2007 Page 2 of 3 ownership and operations at the facility. The facility ceased operation in 1983, and was dismantled in 1990. In 1993, American Cyanamid spun off its chemical division into Cytec Industries, Inc. and ownership of the site transferred to Cytec Industries at that time. The site is currently owned by the City of Fort Worth. BLG Northside Development L.P. has an option to purchase the property under a Lease Agreement and Option to Purchase with the City (City Secretary Contract No. 33411). Historical environmental investigations of the former American Cyanamid/Cytec property identified chemicals of concern (COCs) in soil and groundwater exceeding the applicable Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Tier 1 Protective Concentration levels (PCLs) for residential land use. Groundwater monitoring identified chlorinated volatile organic compounds at concentrations exceeding TCEQ TRRP Tier 1 PCLs. Elevated concentrations of arsenic, lead and cadmium were also identified in groundwater. The Environmental Management Department (DEM), will serve as the lead agency for the loan as well as the Site Manager. The Economic and Community Development Department (ECD) will serve as the Fund Manager. The terms of the loan are as follows: Amount: $800,000.00 Term: 15 years Interest Rate: 2 percent annual interest Payment: No payments in years 1-5, with interest accruing. The loan will be amortized for repayment in years 6-15, with interest continuing to accrue. Collateralization: Reimbursement for actual remediation costs will be paid before allowable administrative or other "soft" costs. In this manner, the value of the improved property, still owned by the City of Fort Worth, will serve to collateralize the loan. After the remediation is complete, the "soft" costs will be reimbursed with any remaining loan funds. When the property is purchased by BLG Northside Development, the revolving loan will either be repaid or the improved property will serve as collateral for the loan. If BLG Northside Development defaults under the loan agreement, the City will have the right to deny the exercise of any option to purchase additional property under the Lease Agreement and Option to Purchase. Disbursement: Environmental Management will request funds disbursement from the EPA. Confirmation of payment of remediation expenditures will be submitted by BLG Northside Development to Environmental Management for certification. Environmental Management will submit authorization for disbursement of funds by Economic and Community Development, which will release funds to BLG, as cleanup milestones are met. M&C G-13129 stated that upon selection for the BCRLF, the City would contract with a third party with experience in structuring loan agreements, collateral agreements, loan disbursement, tracking and repayment instruments to act as fund manager. After BLG requested use of the funds, the City was not successful in locating a lending institution interested in acting in this capacity. The Economic and Community Development Department has personnel experienced in financial matters, and has agreed to act in the capacity of fund manager for this loan. FISCAL INFORMATIONICERTIFICATION: The Finance Director certifies that funds are available in the current operating budget, as appropriated, of the Grants Fund. TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers http://www.cfwnet.org/council_packet/Reportslint_print.asp 5/2/2007 Page 3 of 3 GR76 539120 052214680010 $800,000.00 Submitted for City Manager's Office by: Libby Watson (6183) Originating Department Head: Brian Boerner (6647) Additional Information Contact: Kathryn Hansen (8136) http://www.cfwmet.org/council_packet/Reports/Mc_print.asp 5/2/2007