HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 39489-A3Amendment No. 3
STATE OF TEXAS § CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 39489
(M&CC-7 30b)
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth (City) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (Consultant)
made and entered into City Secretary Contract No. 39489 (the Contract) which was authorized
by M&C C-23816 on the 29th day of September, 2009; and subsequently revised by previous
amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Contract involves professional services for the following project:
Citywide Stormwater System GIS Project
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to execute Amendment No. 3 to said Contract to
include an increased scope of work and revised maximum fee;
NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, acting herein by and through their duly
authorized representatives, enter into the following agreement which amends the Contract:
1.
Article I of the Contract is amended to include the revised scope of services specified in
Attachment A, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. The cost to City for
the additional services to be performed by Consultant total $3,265,000 (see Exhibit 13-2 for a
detailed breakdown).
2.
Article II of the Contract is amended to provide for an increase in the maximum fee to be
paid to Consultant for all work and services performed under the Contract, as amended, so that
the total fee paid by the City for all work and services shall not exceed the sum of $9,458,056.
All other provisions of the Contract which are not expressly amended herein shall remain
in full force and effect.
PROFESIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT (REV 4/14/05)
Page 1 of 2
OFFICIAL RECORD'
CITY SECRETARY
�T. WORTH, Tit
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement in
multiple originals the day and year first above written, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
CITY OF FORT WORTH:
Fernando Costa
Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED:
Douglas Wiersig, P.E.
Director, Pre pt. of Transportation/Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Secretary
CONSULTANT:
Brad Davis, P.E.
Operations Manager, South Central Region
°x
/ �° °
° 6
i�2a�1`L-
Date
Contract Authorization
Date
PROFESIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT (REV 4/14/05)
Page 2 of 2
OFFICIAL REGORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, 7X
Attachment A
Amendment No, 3
City of Fort Worth stormwater Management System
Data Collection, Inventory and Mapping
Year 4 Scope of Work
SECTION I -PROJECT DEFINITION
The goal of Year One was to develop the stormwater management system asset
inventory and database for the top five priority mapsheds in the City and implement
procedures for expanding and maintaining the database throughout Years Two, Three,
and Four. Year One services was a pilot study to allow the City and the consultant team
the opportunity to judge levels of effort required to produce the stormwater mapping
and inventory deliverables that the City needs as expressed in initial scoping meetings
and Version 1.0 of the Quality Management Plan.
Year Two of the project was developed using the procedures and workflows defined and
approved in Year One. Approximately 37 square miles of mapsheds were developed for
the schematic development task in Year One but the majority of those mapsheds were
not surveyed, rectified, assessed nor integrated into the City's existing system. By the
end of Year Two, schematic development was completed for all 222 prioritized
mapsheds, and field survey was completed for approximately 60 mapsheds. By the end
of Year Three, field survey was completed for 76 more mapsheds (program total of 136
mapsheds), and rectification work had been completed for 102 mapsheds, with final QC
for those rectified mapsheds ongoing.
The scope defined below encompasses the effort anticipated to continue to add to the
GIS inventory through program Year 4, building upon the data from Years 1, 2, and 3.
The Year 4 scope of work includes.
• Survey and data capture
• Validate and rectify schematic
• Limited condition assessment of specific assets
• Reporting
• Project management
• Strategic planning of various items for future years of the program and
coordination with other related activities such as condition assessment and asset
management
• A contingency account (use as approved by city staff) to allow for unforeseen
items or final production work needed
The overall project progress and goals will be reviewed quarterly, and the goals and
scope may be adjusted at the direction of City staff in working with the consultant team.
Based upon the understood contract budget for the entire program through Year 4, it is
anticipated that all mapsheds will be fully surveyed. The Year 4 scope also anticipates
that a "modified rectification" approach, which reduces the amount of data to be input
from plans, will be used to complete the rectification on the remaining 120 mapsheds.
The process and level of effort for rectifying these remaining mapsheds has not been
fully tested and determined at this time, which is one of the reasons for the contingency
account. The city staff will be kept apprised of the modified rectification progress at
least on a quarterly basis, as described previously.
The anticipated schedule for the completion of this work is as follows:
• Surveying complete: November 2012 (12 months duration)
• Rectification complete: February 2013 (15 months duration)
• QC comment responses complete and city acceptance: April 2013 (18 months
duration)
• Transition to maintenance and final acceptance of database: October 2013
(occurs in six-month period from April 2013 to October 2013)
Rectification work will overlap surveying work such that only a portion of the rectification
work will need to be completed after the surveying work is completed.
SECTION II -BASIC SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1600 -Field Survev
The location of each stormwater management system asset, as identified and defined in
the QMP for field verification, will be located by conventional survey methods using QMP
survey procedures. Version 1.0 of the Field Survey Manual was developed in Year One
of the project, which specifies the measurements, notes, photographs and occasional
sketches that are to be collected for each asset. If the crews are unable to collect
survey data within an area, the City will be notified and the City will assist in resolving
the issues that prevent the survey (e.g., high traffic areas).
1. Using the equipment, software and procedures as well as the QC processes
defined in the QMP, survey each stormwater management system asset by
priority watershed
A
. Load export of the field verified schematic and supporting data on survey
units
b. Following procedures defined in the Survey Field Manual —
i. Capture location of asset
ii. Take measurements and populate attributes
Take field notes
1. Field observation of condition
iv. Take digital photographs
c. Report issues to the City for assistance in completing survey
2. Upload survey data from survey units
3. Verify that survey attributes meet the standards defined in the QMP
a. Tools, queries and scripts
4. Deliver sub -centimeter survey accuracy data and measurements in ASCII format,
field notes, sketches and photographs in GIS format for City acceptance %J the
survey data
The anticipated number of mapsheds to be fully surveyed under the defined budget, and
added to the mapsheds already completed in Years 1, 2, and 3, is 86 mapsheds. This is
based upon unit costs per surveyed feature being experienced for the Year 3 work. This
would complete the survey work for all 222 mapsheds.
Task 1700 -Validate and Rectify Schematic (Modified Rectification
It is the goal of the program to complete rectification to the schematic level for all of the
mapsheds that receive full field survey. A "modified rectification" approach will be used
which will be a reduced level of effort from the full rectification approach used for the
first 102 mapsheds. The modified approach will primarily involve a reduction in the
amount of data extracted from the plans and the associated attribution, which is
anticipated to significantly reduce the level of effort for rectification and rectification QC
that has been experienced to date for the program. This change will be documented for
the project through a QMP modification.
The survey data will be integrated into the geodatabase and the location of the
schematic assets will be adjusted to the surveyed coordinates, as identified and defined
in the QMP.
1. Using the modified rectification procedures and QA/QC processes defined in the
QMP, adjust the asset locations in the field verified schematic to the survey
locations
a. Utilize the geometric network and connectivity rules
2. Calculate intelligent unique ID, defined in QMP, for new features
3. Verify that the features meet the standards defined in the QMP and perform final
QA
a. Utilize tools developed in Year 3 to check for and correct attribute and
topology errors
b. Compare survey data to digital terrain provided by the City to determine
accuracy of survey data and resurvey points as needed
4. Populate survey attribute fields with actual values while maintaining plan values
5. Verify that attributes meet the standards defined in the QMP
a. Compare plan values to actual values; perform QMP defined data review,
including populating and flagging of missing data using inference tools to
provide a near -model -ready database.
b. Test in InfoWorks/InfoNet model
6. Hyperlink images and survey related data to appropriate asset
7. Deliver geodatabase of the storm water management system which incorporates
the initial schematic, field reconnaissance improvements, survey data and
hyperlinked images in GIS
This task also includes scope for the ESRI ArcGIS Desktop and ArcSDE 10.0 testing and
upgrade. The consultant team will test the database for upgrade to V10 of the software
to ensure compatibility for the system users and consistency with the use of V10
elsewhere in the program. Once testing is complete, the production database will be
upgraded from ArcSDE 9.3 to V10.
Task 1800 -Condition Assessment
Assets will be flagged that appear to need further investigation to determine actual
condition. Drainage complaints, maintenance history and historical knowledge will also
be evaluated to determine which assets will be assessed.
1. Using the methodology defined in the QMP, determine the storm water
management system assets to be assessed
2. Using the equipment, software and procedures as well as the QC processes
defined in the QMP, assess the condition of the specified assets by priority
mapsheds
a. Following procedures defined in the Condition Assessment Field Manual —
i. Conduct visual inspection
ii. Conduct CCTV inspection
iii. Conduct pole mounted camera inspection (not currently used)
iv. Confined space entry
v. Take field notes
vi. Take digital photographs
3. Verify that the assessment data meets the standards defined in the QMP
a. Tools, queries and scripts
4. Use findings to calculate condition assessment ratings
5. Update geodatabase with calculated rating information
6. Deliver video, photos, and condition assessment report of findings in GIS or a
format compatible with the City Asset Management software for City acceptance
It is the goal of this contract and budget to perform limited and strategic condition
assessment. It is anticipated that there will be needs for much more condition
assessment information than the current budget allows. Therefore, condition
assessment work in this task will be limited to the agreed -upon task budget established,
and locations of condition assessment work will be reviewed and confirmed with city
staff before the work is started. This will allow the information collected to be in the
most strategic locations in each mapshed.
This task will also include effort to link the condition assessment information into the
GIS, digitize the new features found, revise geometry and adjust the schematic based
upon findings.
Task 1900 —Reporting
Quarterly reporting will be performed to allow the City to judge actual budget
requirements necessary to map the City's mapsheds. This budget tracking and reporting
will also allow the City to modify the mapping protocol if it appears that the initial
protocol cannot be performed within the constraints of the City's budget. Following the
production of each report, meetings with the City will be scheduled to review project
status.
Task 2000 — Project ManagemenuOversiaht Services
Due to the size, scope and nature of this project, project management services will
include tracking of effort and expenses, review of project progress, scheduling of staff
and subconsultants' staff, quality review and oversight, budget review, communication
with City staff, invoicing, goal review and realignment, and updates to the contract
scope and/or fee, if necessary.
Administrative fees on subconsultants' contracts are included within this task.
The level of effort for this task is based upon the level of effort experienced in Year 3 for
an eighteen -month period, and then a reduced level of project management time for the
last six months of the program.
Task 2200 —Strategic Services
The overall goal of this task is to assess and develop strategies for the storm water
inventory program as it integrates with other storm water programs and as it ends the
data production phase and moves into the maintenance mode.
The current need is for direction and budgeting related to the following areas and
questions:
• Condition assessment —How will a full assessment of the storm water assets be
accomplished, by when, and now much will it cost?
• Land, easements, maintenance agreements —How can conditional areas such as
404 mitigation areas, streams, private maintenance areas, or special easements
be captured in the GIS database for reference by operations and engineering
staff?
• Channels —the focus of the inventory program has been on inlets, outlets, pipes,
and manholes. How can channel attributes be added as well; how long would it
take, and how much would it cost? Which attributes are needed or useful?
• Best Management Practice (BMP) implementation —How can the GIS be used to
capture and track BMP requirements and implementation?
• Database transition to maintenance —How will the data entry procedures change
once the inventory is over and the database is under maintenance by city staff?
• Work Order/Asset management —What changes need to be made in the GIS
database to allow data transfer and coordination with the new work order/asset
management program being developed?
The following scope is intended to provide solutions to the questions above.
1. Condition assessment — Pipe condition assessments were reduced to the
minimum necessary to create the Schematic for the Mapping Project. In order to
support capital replacement program and the proposed asset management
system (WOAMS), a structured program is needed to assess conditions of the
underground storm drain system beginning with a proposed baseline CCTV of
new lines as a condition of acceptance by the CFW. Strategy should consider
establishing priorities for accomplishing this work based on likely need for
replacement, known blockages, other likely maintenance issues, and budget.
Different types of assessments should be considered based on the issues, e.g.,
spot observations as well as detailed condition assessments. After preliminary
research by Jacobs, a group will be pulled together for brainstorming as a means
of developing a strategy/decision document. Specific work tasks are:
a. Establish goals and schedule (workplan) for development of the strategy
document. Conduct an initial assessment of baseline data needed and
develop unit costs for data gathering processes. Develop methods for
ranking priorities based upon defect scoring standards or other means.
Utilize statistics or trends as needed to help focus the priorities.
b. Develop rules and procedures to serve as a manual for the program.
Develop a technical memorandum as documentation.
c. Develop a request for qualifications (RFQ) document for city use to
procure condition assessment contractors.
d. Develop a construction standards document for inclusion in the city's
standard specifications which would include items such as post -
construction CCTV inspection of storm water pipes.
2. Land/conservation layer -- The CFW staff needs to inventory known 404
gation areas, Waters of the US and areas that are potentially conservation
areas (where information is available) so that it is clear which areas are to be
preserved in a "natural state" and which require routine maintenance. In most
cases, these areas are designated only by signage which may or may not reflect
original plans or current realities. In some cases, higher maintenance areas may
need to be defined and easements put into place. Some of this information will
be on development plats — HOAs, etc. — where information could be looked up.
This situation is currently happening in the Heritage development. Understanding
20-year-old aerial photos and contours might also be used to determine if a
channel is along an old stream bed and thus may be classified as "waters of the
U.S." In many cases, engineered channels may appear to be natural because of
the lack of maintenance over many years. In summary, a simple work program
will be developed to define how to map these conditions based on readily
available information, as a guide for future planning and
operations/maintenance.
3. Easements and private maintenance agreements -- The current database only
includes easement boundary information that the GIS project has digitized from
plats. A long term strategy is needed, however, for an appropriate review of
other records including information in real property, additional files found in the
vault, and when necessary, digging through files at the Courthouse. This will
require a balance of identifying where the amount of work seems worth the cost.
As a beginning point for determining the "dimensions" of this problem, Jacobs
will query the current GIS schematic to determine percents and locations of
existing easement information (and ROW's where in streets) with respect to (1)
underground pipes and (2) open channels. This will help determine the
magnitude of work that may be needed in future years of the program. A
summary document of the findings and recommendations will be developed.
4. Channels —The CFW inventoried channels 5 to 10 years ago, with respect to
cross-section as well as general condition (internal as well as the TranSystems
inventory). At the beginning of the storm water inventory project, channel
attributes were reviewed and refined in the Manual. The current need is for
general planning as well as operations/maintenance information for all channels
subject to regular maintenance, including standard cross-section, armoring,
bottom treatment (armoring or pavement, pilot or standard bottom), general
vegetation conditions, etc. Previous work in this area will be reviewed, followed
by a recommendation for a multi -year program for collecting the needed
inventory information for these stormwater features.
5. BMPs —these water quality features are expected to grow in number and
complexity in the long term. A strategy will be developed to review and refine
previous arrangements by using the database as a tracking tool. For
completeness, special features such as dams, levees, other open water features,
stormwater trash collectors, etc., will be included.
6. Database transition —this is a short term need related to wrapping up the data
creation program and fashioning the database for full maintenance operations by
city staff. In coordination with this task, the City will need to define the business
processes that best fit the storm water mapping needs. Jacobs will develop the
strategy document and implement the final changes to the database and
associated tools to allow this maintenance phase to begin.
7. Asset management —Jacobs will coordinate with city staff and the asset
management consultant to modify the database as needed to allow for
communication and data transfer between the stormwater GIS and asset
management functions.
In summary, the areas above will have strategies developed, which will in some cases
include amulti-year approach of data collection and analysis (Years 5-9 of program).
This will begin with organized workshop sessions for each of these topics (or in
combination) leading to decision documents that can be used for planning and
budgeting. Jacobs will assist with the interviews, workshops, and planning documents as
part of the Year 4 scope of work. Schedule for each task will be developed prior to the
start of each task and be driven by the city's planning and budget cycle needs. Budget
for all of Task 2200 is limited to an allowance of $265,000,
Attachment B-1
City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management System
Data Collection, Inventory and Mapping - Year Four
Basis of Compensation
Task
0100 - Update QMP
0200 - Geodatabase Requirements (COMPLETED)
0300 - Geodatabase Design Scema (COMPLETED)
0400 -Data Compilation
0500 - Data Conversion (NOT USED)
0600 - Data Scanning (NOT USED)
0700 - Georeferencing
0800 - Schematic Development
0900 -Maintenance
0903 - GIS Database Maintenance
1000 - Easement Data Compilation
1100 - Easement Data Scanning (NOT USED)
1200 - Georeferencing for Easement Development
1300 - Easement Development
1400 - Field Reconnaissance
1500 - Evaluation of Easement Layer (NOT USED)
1600 - Field Survey
1700 - Validate and Rectify Schematic
1800 - Condition Assessment
1900 - Reporting
2000 - Project Management
2100 - Inlet Marker Program Support (COMPLETED)
2200 - Strategic Services
Contingency
Subtotal Fee -Amendment #3
Non-M/V1/BE Subconsultants
M/WBE Subconsultants
Amendment #3 M/WBE Percentage
Program -to -date Summary Subtotal contract
Non-M/WBE Subconsultants
M/WBE Subconsultants
M/WBE Percentage
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$945,000.00
$1,1037000.00
$118, 000.00
$4,000.00
$360,000000
$265,000.00
$4707000.00
$3,265,000.00
$521,500.00
$946,850.00
29.0%
$11,149,055
$2,236,270
$3,478,090
31.2%
m
Z
c
y
a)3
E
H
.o
O
wc u
m
Y
m
Q
Val
w
.a
0
Q
im
C
W
W
0
E
E
o
=
�
N
Y
N
7
F
J
V)
0!
H
C
N
m
M
X
�
O
H
N
LO
m
Y
i
G
m
N
3
W
Ln
V)
O I
Ln
m
m
N
V-i
N
E =
N
GO
oo
w
to
W
Ol
N
M
� i
W(
u
!�
r�
s1,
N=N
�
t
VT
V�V}i
Vi
I
rn
d �
W
o m
O in
I-
v
� N Ln
to F
u
v
LnO
I- O ; V 00
to
m.
�r N
2 C M� N!a tm0
O' N
m V L
v ' cmi c Ln
Y, Y c RO H M o
E+ h bk
C
r i
W
i
O/ O
J m N In
m
F"
m
ac
Tmi O
,i tom:
a
0
0
0
0
0
ei
rl
000
O
O03
VT
OCI
O
00
O
O
O
O00
V}
V!
O
N
N
O
O
N
0
N
M
N
N
0
O
O
N
O
V
�N
y�
C
rr
�
LL
�
000
N
O
0
V
v
J
C7
L
Cam]
O
N
o
Ln
0
o
:
0
M
i?
O
O
O
VT
O
O
rl
Vf
O
VF
O
a
W
M
Vl
O
O
0
O
O
O
- O
O
O
O
Nrsl
O
0
M
:
n
0
0
o
O
o`
O
ON
0
ON.
iD
O�1
'..
O
O
O'O
O
O
00
w
r�
w
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
VI
N
F
h
c
�
W
L
L
L
L
bD
h0'
m
00
d
C
>
>
>
>
�
O
O
O
O
Cl
N
O
a
0
O
N
O O O O O O
lk0 O1 O' Ol Ol
O W . r� N � Ln r^
N V/ V} VT VT VT VT
■v
L:
O
O
Cl
o„ro
a
�Im
Ln
00
O
00 .
N
0
O
O
M
N
: M
0
0
0
ui
�
N
V1
fMf
{/P
n
a
C
N
O
�
�N
4!
J
N
�
t.
N
O
W
0
W
O
r
@
�
w
m
0
0
0IV
VP
lOD
V
VT
O
e�-1
N
O
O
lPTVI00
m
Ol
VT
0
O
0
t`
n
O
OMl
O
N
E
VI
G/
N
Q
Ctxo
0
'
y
LL
o
u°cc
O
Exhibit 0-3A
(Supplement to Attachment B)
City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management System
Data Collection, Inventory and Mapping - Year Four
Summary of Total Project Fees
Consulting Firm Prime Responsibility Amount
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Survey, Rectify, Condition Assessment, PM $177961650,00
NTB Associates, Inc.
DFW Infrastructure, Inc.
Franzi Davis, GISP
Surveying and Mapping, Inc.
ANA Consultants, LLC
Gorrondona & Associates, Inc.
Fulton Surveying, Inc.
Total for Professional Services
Task Description
1 Field Survey
2 Rectify Schematic
3 Condition Assessment
4 Reporting
5 Project Management
6 Strategic Services
7 Contingency
GIS and Survey QC
CCTV Condition Assessment
GIS QC
Field Survey
Field Survey
Field Survey
Field Survey
Scope of Services
See Attachment A
See Attachment A
See Attachment A
See Attachment A
See Attachment A
See Attachment A
Total Fee
$945,000,00
$1,103,000.00
$118,000.00
$4,000.00
$360,000.00
$2651000.00
$4703000.00
$3,2653000,00
$521,500.00
$481000, 00
$1001000.00
$2181250,00
$1261250.00
$2361100.00
$2181250.00
$3,265,000.00
MWBE Fee
$7981850.00
$1001000.00
$481000.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$946,850.00
Surveying and Mapping, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 -Field Survey
ANA Consultants, LLC shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 -Field Survey
Gorrondona & Associates, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 - Field Survey
Fulton Surveing, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 - Field Survey
Franzi Davis, GISP shall participate in performing the QC review of Task 2 -- Rectify Schematic
DFW Infrastructure, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 3 -- Condition Assessment
Percent
100.0%
Percent
84.5%
9.1
40.7%
0.0 0
29.0 O
Non-MWBE Participation Total Fee Percent
NTB Associates, Inc. $521,500.00 16.0%
Total Fee
$945,000,00
$1,103,000.00
$118,000.00
$4,000.00
$360,000.00
$2651000.00
$4703000.00
$3,2653000,00
$521,500.00
$481000, 00
$1001000.00
$2181250,00
$1261250.00
$2361100.00
$2181250.00
$3,265,000.00
MWBE Fee
$7981850.00
$1001000.00
$481000.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$946,850.00
Surveying and Mapping, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 -Field Survey
ANA Consultants, LLC shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 -Field Survey
Gorrondona & Associates, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 - Field Survey
Fulton Surveing, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 1 - Field Survey
Franzi Davis, GISP shall participate in performing the QC review of Task 2 -- Rectify Schematic
DFW Infrastructure, Inc. shall participate in performing portions of Task 3 -- Condition Assessment
Percent
100.0%
Percent
84.5%
9.1
40.7%
0.0 0
29.0 O
Non-MWBE Participation Total Fee Percent
NTB Associates, Inc. $521,500.00 16.0%
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 11/15/2011 -Ordinance No. 19983-11-2011
DATE: Tuesday, November 15, 2011
LOG NAME: 20SWMGISPROJECT-YR4
REFERENCE NO.: C-25300
SUBJECT:
Adopt Supplemental Appropriation Ordinance Increasing Appropriations in the Stormwater Utility Fund in
the Amount of $1,105,000.00 and Decreasing the Unaudited, Unreserved, Undesignated Stormwater Utility
Fund Balance by the Same Amount and Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 3 to City Secretary
Contract No. 39489 with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., for Citywide Stormwater System GIS Project in
the Amount of $3,265,000.00 for the Transportation and Public Works Department Bringing the Total
Contract Amount to $11,149,055.00 (ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Adopt the attached supplemental appropriation ordinance increasing estimated receipts and
appropriations in the Stormwater Utility Fund in the Amount of $1,105,000.00 and decreasing the
unaudited, unreserved, undesignated Stormwater Utility Fund Balance by the same amount; and
2. Authorize execution of Amendment No. 3 to City Secretary Contract No. 39489 with Jacobs
Engineering Group, Inc., for Citywide Stormwater System GIS Project in the Amount of $3,265,000.00 for
the Transportation and Public Works Department, Stormwater Management Division.
DISCUSSION:
This Mayor and Council Communication (M&C) requests approval of Amendment No. 3 for the final phase
of a planned multi -phase project to locate, assess, and map the approximately 35,000 inlets and 1000
miles of pipe in the City's drainage system. The overall project scope of work includes the development of
a Geographic Information System (GIS) map of the system and associated easements from: engineering
plans, detailed field surveys, and video tapes of selected pipes. The GIS map will efficiently provide vital
data on the location, condition, material type, and age of these stormwater facilities. Such data is crucial
for the accurate assessment of drainage problems, the planning and design of effective capital projects,
and the efficient operations of field maintenance crews for both preventive maintenance and emergency
response.
to the previous phases of this initiative all engineering plans have been mapped and roughly 45 percent of
inlets and manholes have been surveyed. The scope of this Amendment will focus on completing the
survey and tying this information back to the engineering plans. In addition, the condition assessment of
selected pipes will be completed and a program will be outlined for ongoing condition assessment to be
executed as priortities and resources dictate.
In August 2007, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued and a total of six proposals were received. The
top three consultants were interviewed. Carter and Burgess, Inc., was selected as the most qualified and
an Agreement was executed with them in the amount of $1,690,999.00 (M&C C-23072). Carter and
Burgess, Inc., was subsequently acquired by Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Jacobs), so a new contract
Logname: 20SWMGISPROJECT-YR4 Page 1 of 2
was executed with Jacobs for Phase 2 services in the amount of $3,590,056.00 (M&C C-23816).
Subsequent amendments to that Agreement were $480,000.00 for database maintenance (M&C C-24410)
and $2,123,000.00 for Phase 3 services (M&C C-24446). Amendment No. 3 in the amount of
$3,265,000.00 will bring the total contract cost to $11,149,055.00. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.,
proposes to perform the scope of work for this Amendment on a time and materials basis for anot-to-
exceed fee of $3,265,000.00. City staff considers this fee to be fair and reasonable for the scope of
services proposed.
Currently available is $2,160,000.00 in the Fiscal Year 2012 Adopted Stormwater Utility operating budget
and the attached Ordinance will appropriate the remaining $1,105,000.00 making a total of $3,265,000.00
available for this Amendment.
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance by committing to 29
percent M/WBE participation. The City's MWBE goal is 29 percent.
This project is located in ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS.
FISCAL INFORMATION /CERTIFICATION:
The Financial Management Services Director certifies that upon approval of the above recommendations
and adoption of the attached supplemental appropriation ordinance, funds will be available in the current
operating budget, as appropriated, of the Stormwater Utility Fund. Upon approval, the unaudited,
unreserved, undesignated fund balance of the Stormwater Utility Fund will exceed the minimum reserve
as outlined in the Financial Management Policy Statements.
FUND CENTERS:
TO Fund/Account/Centers
1)PE69 531200 0209204
CERTIFICATIONS:
FROM Fund/Account/Centers
$1,105,000.00 2) PE69 531200 0209204
Submitted for City Manager's Office b�,
Originating Department Head:
Fernando Costa (6122)
Douglas W. Wiersig (7801)
Additional Information Contact: Elizabeth Young (6785)
_ _ _ __
ATTACHMENTS
1. 20SWMGISPROJECT-YR4 A02.doc (Public)
2. compliance memo yr4v2.pdf (CFW Internal)
3. PE69-SZZZZZ-02092ZZ Current.doc (CFW Internal)
4. PE69-5ZZZZZ-02092ZZ.doc (CFW Internal)
$3,265, 000.00
Logname: 20SWMGISPROJECT-YR4 Page 2 of 2