HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 40983STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
CITY SECRETARY
CONTRACT NO•n_aLliamis-4-
KNOWN ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
not
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into the day of 0 aczblt, , 2010 by and
between the City of Fort Worth, a home -rule municipal corporation situated in Tarrant, Denton,
Parker, and Wise Counties, Texas, acting herein by and through its duly authorized Assistant
City Manager, hereinafter called the "City", and AECOM USA GROUP, INC., an independent
contractor "Consultant". City and Consultant may be referred to herein individually as a Party,
or collectively as the Parties.
WITNESSETH
That for and in consideration of mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the Parties
hereto mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
SERVICES
Section 1.
Consultant hereby agrees to perform as an independent contractor the services set forth in the
Scope of Services attached hereto as Attachment "A". These services shall be performed in
connection with the HYDROLOGIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD WARNING
SYSTEM STUDY. ("Project").
Section 2.
Additional services, if any, will be requested in writing by the City. City shall not pay for any
work performed by Consultant or its subconsultants, subcontractors and/or suppliers that has not
been ordered in writing. It is specifically agreed that Consultant shall not be compensated for
any alleged additional work resulting from oral orders of any person.
ARTICLE 2
COMPENSATION
Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the Fee Schedule shown in Attachment "B".
Payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, materials, supplies, and equipment
necessary to complete the services described in Attachment "A". However the total fee paid by
the City shall not exceed a total of $482,000 unless the City and the Consultant mutually agree
upon a fee amount for additional services and amend this Agreement accordingly.
The Consultant shall provide monthly invoices to the City. Payment for services rendered shall
be due within thirty (30) days of the uncontested performance of the particular services so
ordered and receipt by City of Consultant's invoice for payment of same. ;�- ,_
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TX
Acceptance by Consultant of said payment shall operate as and shall release the City from all
claims or liabilities under this Agreement for anything related to, done, or furnished in
connection with the services for which payment is made, including any act or omission of the
City in connection with such services.
ARTICLE 3
TERM
Unless terminated pursuant to the terms herein, this Agreement shall be for a term of three years,
beginning upon the date of its execution, or until the completion of the subject matter
contemplated herein, whichever occurs first.
ARTICLE 4
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall operate hereunder as an independent contractor, and not as an officer, agent,
servant, or employee of the City. Consultant shall have exclusive control of and the exclusive
right to control the details of its work to be performed hereunder and all persons performing
same, and shall be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents,
employees, contractors and subcontractors. The doctrine of respondent superior shall not apply
as between City and Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors,
and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between City and
Consultant.
ARTICLE 5
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
Section 1
Work performed by Consultant shall comply in all aspects with all applicable local, state and
federal laws and with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the local, state and
national boards, bureaus and agencies. Approval by the City shall not constitute or be deemed to
be a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant or its officers, agents, employees,
contractors and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of its services performed
hereunder.
Section 2
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the Consultant shall
mdemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City against liability for any damage caused by or
resulting from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure
to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by the Consultant or Consultant's agent, consultant
under contract, or another entity over which the Consultant s exercises control.
Professional Services
Consultant Agreement
Rev 10.6.09
Page 2 of 8
ARTICLE 6
INSURANCE
Section 1.
Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance
required under this Article and the City has approved such insurance, nor shall Consultant allow
any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all similar insurance of the
subcontractor has been so obtained and approval given by the City; provided, however,
Consultant may elect to add any subconsultant as an additional insured under its liability
policies.
Commercial General Liability
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$1,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability
$1,000,000 each accident (or reasonably equivalent limits of
coverage if written on a split limits basis). Coverage shall be on
any vehicle used in the course of the Project.
Worker's Compensation
Coverage A: statutory limits
Coverage B: $100,000 each accident
$500,000 disease - policy limit
$100,000 disease - each employee
Section 2.
Additional Insurance Requirements
a. Except for employer's liability insurance coverage under Consultant's worker's
compensation insurance policy, the City, its officers, employees and servants shall be
endorsed as an additional insured on Consultant's insurance policies.
b. Certificates of insurance shall be delivered to the Department of Transportation and
Public Works, Attention• Amy Cannon, 1000 Throckmorton Street, Fort Worth, TX
76102, prior to commencement of work
c. Any failure on part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not
constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements specified herein.
d. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide the City a minimum thirty days
notice of cancellation, non -renewal, and/or material change in policy terms or coverage.
A ten days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium.
e. Insurers must be authorized to do business in the State of Texas and have a current
A.M. Best rating of A: VII or equivalent measure of financial strength and solvency.
Professional Services
Consultant Agreement
Rev 10.6.09
Page 3 of 8
f. Other than worker's compensation insurance, in lieu of traditional insurance, City
may consider alternative coverage or risk treatment measures through insurance pools
or risk retention groups The City must approve in writing any alternative coverage.
g.
Workers compensation insurance policy(s) covering employees employed on the
Project shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation providing rights of recovery in
favor of the City.
h City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for
Consultant's insurance.
i. Consultant's insurance policies shall each be endorsed to provide that such insurance
is primary protection and any self -funded or commercial coverage maintained by City
shall not be called upon to contribute to loss recovery.
J•
In the course of the Agreement, Consultant shall report, in a timely manner, to City's
officially designated contract administrator any known loss occurrence which could
give rise to a liability claim or lawsuit or which could result in a property loss.
k. Consultant's liability shall not be limited to the specified amounts of insurance
required herein
1. Upon the request of City, Consultant shall provide complete copies of all insurance
policies required by these Agreement documents.
ARTICLE 7
TRANSFER OR ASSIGNMENT
City and Consultant each bind themselves, and their lawful successors and assigns, to this
Agreement. Consultant, its lawful successors and assigns, shall not assign, sublet or transfer any
interest in this Agreement without prior written consent of the City.
ARTICLE 8
TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
Section 1.
City may terminate this Agreement for its convenience on 30 days' written notice. Either the
City or the Consultant for cause may terminate this Agreement if either Party fails substantially
to perform through no fault of the other and does not commence correction of such
nonperformance with 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the correction thereafter,
Section 2
If City chooses to terminate this Agreement under Article 8, upon receipt of notice of
termination, Consultant shall discontinue services rendered up to the date of such termination
and City shall compensate Consultant based upon calculations m Article 2 of this Agreement and
Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein
Professional Services
Consultant Agreement
Rev 10.6.09
Page 4 of 8
Section 3.
All reports, whether partial or complete, prepared under this Agreement, including any original
drawings or documents, whether furnished by the City its officers, agents, employees,
consultants, or contractors, or prepared by Consultant, shall be or become the property of the
City, and shall be furnished to the City prior to or at the time such services are completed, or
upon termination or expiration of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 9
RIGHT TO AUDIT
(a) Consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent
books, documents, papers and records of Consultant involving transactions relating to this
Agreement. Consultant agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours
to all necessary facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate workspace in order
to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. City shall give
Consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
(b) Consultant further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder, a provision to the effect
that the subcontracting consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3)
years after final payment under the subcontract, have access to and the right to examine any
directly pertinent books, documents papers and records of such subconsultant, involving
transactions to the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during normal
working hours to all subconsultant facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate
work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article City
shall give Consultant and any subconsultant reasonable advance notice of intended audit.
(c) Consultant and subconsultants agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the
City. The City agrees to reimburse Consultant for the cost of copies at the rate published in the
Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed.
ARTICLE 10
MINORITY AND WOMAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
(M/WBE) PARTICIPATION
In accordance with City Ordinance No. 15530, the City has goals for the participation of
minority business enterprises and woman business enterprises ("M/WBE") in City contracts.
Consultant acknowledges the M/WBE goal established for this Agreement and its commitment
to meet that goal. Any misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent misrepresentation)
and/or the commission of fraud by the Consultant may result in the termination of this
Agreement and debarment from participating in City contracts for a period of time of not less
than three (3) years.
Professional Services
Consultant Agreement
Rev 10.6.09
Page 5 of 8
ARTICLE 11
OBSERVE AND COMPLY
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws and
regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any way affect this Agreement
and the work hereunder, and shall observe and comply with all orders, laws ordinances and
regulations which may exist or may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or
authority for such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be considered.
Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and all of its officers, agents and
employees from and against all claims or liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law,
ordinance, or regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees.
ARTICLE 12
VENUE AND JURISDICTION
If any action, whether real or asserted, at law or in equity, arises on the basis of any provision of
this Agreement, venue for such action shall lie in state courts located in Tarrant County, Texas or
the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas — Fort Worth Division This
Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.
ARTICLE 13
CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION
The Parties acknowledge that each party and, if it so chooses, its counsel have reviewed and
revised this Agreement and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities
are to be resolved against the drafting party must not be employed in the interpretation of this
Agreement or any amendments or exhibits hereto.
ARTICLE 14
SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any word, phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph, section or other part of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or
circumstance shall ever be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or
unconstitutional for any reason, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such
word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or other part of this Agreement to other
persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and this Agreement shall be construed as
if such invalid or unconstitutional portion had never been contained therein.
ARTICLE 15
NOTICES
Notices to be provided hereunder shall be sufficient if forwarded to the other Party by hand -
delivery or via U.S. Postal Service certified mail return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the
address of the other Party shown below:
Professional Services
Consultant Agreement
Rev 10.6.09
Page 6 of 8
City of Fort Worth
Attn: Amy Cannon
Department of Transportation and Public Works
1000 Throckmorton Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
Consultant:
AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Attn: Brenda Gasperich
17300 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1010
Dallas, Texas 75248.
ARTICLE 16
HEADINGS
The headings contained herein are for the convenience in reference and are not intended to
define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement
ARTICLE 17
COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and each counterpart shall, for all
purposes, be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and
the same instrument.
Professional Services
Consultant Agreement
Rev 10.6.09
(Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank)
Page 7 of 8
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement in
multiple originals the day and year first above written, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
CITY OF FORT WORTH:
Fernando Costa
Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED:
a<1S
William A. erkest, P ' ., Director
Department of Transportation and Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGALITY:
‘,)1 11 A/Rd(
Assistant C4ty Attorney
ATTEST:
Marty Hendrix
City Secretary
V.10\r2A\ka°
Date
Professional Services
Consultant Agreement
Rev 10.6.09
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.:
zQa,iau iC31A-7-Cta
Daron Butler
District Manager
Contract Authorization
911L41,o
Date
%-al? ix
tfOHoo�� tio11,,
&'RkOQ°°
os�o Y
(? °I) Rye)
0000000
',Atter
Page 8 of 8
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TX
ATTACHMENT "A"
HYDROLOGIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM STUDY
STUDY NO. SWS-043
PROFESSIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
Background and Goals
The City of Fort Worth has a long history of severe flooding as early as 1949 when the Trinity River in Fort
Worth broke through its levees and spilled floodwaters into the city's commercial, industrial and residential
districts. An estimated 11 inches of rain had fallen overnight on the Clear Fork s watershed southwest of
the city In the recent past, the City has experienced severe urbanized flooding in several areas of the
City with aging infrastructure Over the recent years, the City's Storm Water Management (SWM)
program has launched several initiatives to identify the causes of the localized flooding and create
solutions to address them. Recognizing that some of these initiatives will take several years to produce
tangible benefits the SWM staff has expressed a need to modify their current High Water Warning
System (HVVWS) and convert it to a fully functional Flood Warning System (FWS) The City envisions a
state-of-the-art FWS that is capable of anticipating hazard to life and property in advance of storm events
occurring and having a flood response mechanism in place to notify and alert City and emergency
personnel and citizens in flood prone neighborhoods. Furthermore, in the process of the creating the
FWS, the City envisions fulfilling the following several high priority needs:
1. Providing hydrologic characteristics of the watersheds.
2. Estimating flood loss potentials.
3. Identifying modeling needs in areas not currently identified by the City.
4. Preparing a cost -benefit analysis for areas requiring passive flood protection measures (eg. flood
walls, relief structures relocation etc.)
5. Identifying long term hardware and software maintenance costs.
6. Estimating data transmission needs.
7. Planning for adequate data processing capabilities.
8. Prepare a phasing schedule for implementation of the FWS.
9. Provide integration with the City's GIS system.
General Approach
AECOM is very pleased to assist the City's SWM staff in this important project and proposes a two-phase
approach to accomplish the several goals and priorities of this project.
Phase I of the project will help the City identify their current capabilities, current technology, and provide a
road map of the steps involved in implementing the FWS system. Phase II of the project would provide a
recommendation of the final FWS system and the critical needs to acquire and implement the system
Phase II of the project will also include services that the City may require in supporting the post -
implementation period of the FWS.
Page 1 of 13
A=COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE I
1 Needs Assessment
The purpose of the Needs Assessment is to provide the City with a guideline for upgrading and
expanding its existing HWWS in the near future to a state-of-the-art Early Flood Warning system.
This assessment is needed to maximize the effectiveness of the FWS in saving lives and property,
while minimizing the associated system cost in maintaining that effectiveness.
The Needs Assessment will evaluate rainfall patterns of fifteen (15) historical storm events and the
subsequent impacts to the City's existing creeks and infrastructure during and after these storm
events, and evaluate the hazard and response data that occurred with respect to these events and
other events during the City's past.
Furthermore, the Needs Assessment will help identify flood risk and high hazard locations across
the City by collecting data (critical locations, complaints, and surveys) and modeling flood events
using the best available models from various local and federal entities. Modeling will be focused on
fifteen historical storm events and shall simulate some of the results seen during these events.
These engineering models serve as a framework for a City -Wide master drainage plan where new
models and data collected by the City as part of its various drainage and watershed planning
studies can be incorporated as they are developed by various consultants. The Needs Assessment
shall include the following items.
1.1 Identify historic flood events for system design & calibration
1.1.1 Historic flood event review
1.1.1.1 Review archival data on severe storms in terms of flood extent and damage in
Fort Worth and availability of related precipitation data
1.1.1.2 Evaluate broad meteorological conditions and the storm type, direction, and
movement that produced flood conditions
1.1.1.3 Develop a prioritized list of fifteen (15) historic flood event periods
1.1.2 Meet with City of Fort Worth staff to discuss and select fifteen (15) historic flood
events for use as a design basis
1.2 Review history of flooding: Rainfall, flow, and impacts associated with the fifteen (15) historic
flood events identified as part of Task 1.1.2 shall be researched and obtained from various
data sources serving the area.
1.2.1 Collect and analyze the best available precipitation data for selected flood events
1.2.1.1 Rain Gauge Data: Gauge network data is vital in the historical analysis of
storm events. Gauge network precipitation data from the following entities
shall be obtained and used in the analysis of the historic flood events.
1.2.1.1.1 Request and obtain data with spatial coordinates for the rain gauge
network and period of record from the following agencies:
• City of Fort Worth
• Tarrant Regional Water District
• United States Geological Survey
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• City of Grand Prairie
• NWS
1.2.1.1.2 Conduct quality control and review of the rain gauge data to
identify gaps in service, clogging, and spikes.
1.2.1.1.3 Assemble and prepare QA/QC'd rain gauge data for use in radar
rainfall analysis
Page 2 of 13
A=COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE I (Contd.)
1.2.1.2 Radar Rainfall Analysis: Radar estimates provide high resolution spatial data
that is representative of rainfall over a watershed. Rain gauge data can be
used to enhance and quality control the radar rainfall estimates. The
combined use of gauge and radar rainfall measurements can improve
hydrologic model results and hydrologic prediction when adjusted using rain
gauge data. For the 15 selected rainfall events, radar rainfall estimates will be
generated using rain gauge data as follows:
1.2.1.2.1 Assemble gauge and radar data to cover the storm event and
antecedent periods.
1.2.1.2.2 Compare and evaluate base data (Level 2) reflectivity and NWS
Multi sensor Precipitation estimates (MPE) for the event storm
totals
1.2.1.2.3 Identify and map storm return period for each event in relation to
flooded areas
1.2.1.2.4 Evaluate rainfall depth and intensity distribution by
stream/watershed
1.2.1.2.5 Generate gadded rainfall maps for each event for use in hydrologic
modeling
1 2 1 2 6 Produce synoptic overview and descriptive statistics report for
each event analyzed
1.2.2 Collect stream depth data: Best available stream depth data shall be collected from
gauge networks and high water mark field surveys.
1.2.2.1 Stream Gauge data: Gauge data for stream depth shall be obtained and
analyzed from the following sources:
• City of Fort Worth
• Tarrant Regional Water District
• United States Geological Survey
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
1.2.2.2 High water mark field surveys: High water mark field surveys performed by
local entities achieve a supplementary role in collection of depth data for local
stream conditions during historical events Such data usually available from
local governmental entities shall be collected from the following entities:
• City of Fort Worth
• United States Geological Survey
• National Weather Service
1.2.3 Collect hazard / response information: Hazard and response information from the
following entities shall be collected
• EOC reports (including Police, Fire, EMS)
• NWS reports
• Red Cross reports
• Flood insurance claims
• News media archives
1.3 Identify flood risk areas
1.3.1 Identify structures and transportation corridors within hazard areas by developing a
shapefile of drainage conveyances having a minimum of 64 acres contributing area for
the following conveyance types.
Page 3 of 13
A COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE I (Contd.)
• Open Channel
• Closed conveyance
1.3.1.1 Acquire shapefiles of at -risk features from the City of Fort Worth (within 100'
buffer of any FEMA floodplain or within 150' buffer of any drainage
conveyance) for the following types of structures.
1.3.1.1.1 Habitable structures
1.3.1.1.2 Public venues
1.3.1.1.3 Transportation corridors
• Roadway
• Rail
1.3.1.1.4 Utility Lines (Water, sewer, electric, telephone, natural gas, cable
TV)
1.3.1.1.5 Critical Infrastructure as identified by the Office of Emergency
Management and the Transportation and Public Works
Department
1.3.2 Engineering Modeling: AECOM shall use accepted engineering assumptions of
estimating flows for watersheds within the City. As such, existing work performed by
the SWM staff or other consultants shall be used, where available.
1.3.2.1 Develop depth and velocity raster graphics from
1.3.2.1.1 FEMA models (10-, 50-, 100-, 500-year; and 2-, 5-, 25-year where
existing)
1.3.2.1.2 Other local models
1.3.2.2 Develop average response time graphic for modeled streams (peak
precipitation to peak flow)
1.3.2.3 Determine depths and velocities at these structures and roadways
1.4 Review all information to determine areas of flood risk
1.4.1 Develop internal findings
1.4.2 Meet with City Storm Water Management (SWM) staff to review findings
1.5 Develop flood warning recommendations
1.5.1 Develop internal recommendations
1.5.2 Meet with SWM staff to review recommendations
1.6 Generate "Needs Assessment Report" that discusses the assessment process, along with
flood risk findings and conceptual flood warning recommendations.
1.6.1 Draft report
1.6.2 Final report
2 Web Development
AECOM will work with the City to develop an Internet presence for the existing HWWS and LWC.
2.1 Secure interface for staff access
2.2 Restricted interface for public access
Page 4 of 13
AZCOM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE I (Contd.)
2.3 ESRI Software Compatible
2.4 All development code delivered to City of Fort Worth
3 Project Management and Deliverables
AECOM shall provide meeting minutes for all meetings attended, decision logs for major decisions
taken during meetings and during the normal course of the project Quality control of all documents
shall be followed using AECOM standards with QA/QC documents filled out for major deliverables
Deliverables of subcontractors shall be performed by subcontractors using their in-house QA/QC
procedures followed by a quality control check by AECOM before subsequent use or release.
As part of Phase I, the Needs Assessment Report shall include relevant data collected by AECOM
regarding historical storm events and engineering modeling results of creeks within the City of Fort
Worth limits that will be used to identify flood risk areas within the City This report will serve a dual
purpose of fulfilling the City's current needs of identifying the flood and risk conditions associated
with its creeks while providing a larger framework to identify areas requiring in-depth analysis in the
future.
A webpage shall be developed to assist the City's SWM staff with monitoring the existing HWWS
while promoting public awareness by providing limited public access to the website as part of
Phase I.
A refined Scope of Services for Phase II services shall also be prepared and provided to the City at
the end of Phase I for items that are currently unclear due to their dependence on the Phase I
results.
Phase I Deliverables:
3.1 Four (4) hard copies of the draft Needs Assessment Report (Task 1.7.1).
3.2 Four (4) hard copies and a digital copy of the final Needs Assessment Report (Task 1.7.2).
3.3 An interim interactive webpage for City and public use that showcases the existing HWWS
system.
3.4 Meeting Minutes
3.5 Project Decision Logs
Roles and Responsibilities
The following responsibilities are included in Phase I of the project.
Task
Items
Team
Member
Brief
Description
Historic
flood
event
review
1.1.1
Collection
& QC
data
1.2.1.1
of
rain
gauge
SWG,
Inc.
Radar
Rainfall
Analysis
1.2.1.2
1.2.2
Collect
stream
depth
data
and
high
water
mark
field
surveys
1.3.2.2
Assist
in developing
time
determine
depth/velocities
response
graphics
and
at
crossings
EBG,
Inc.
Assist
in reviewing
areas
of
flood
risk
1.5
1.6
Assist
in developing
flood
warning
recommendations
Assessment
1.7.1
Assist
in
preparing
draft
Needs
report
Engineering
Services,
Project
Management,
Deliverables,
All
Tasks
AECOM
QA/QC
of
Subcontractor
Deliverables
Page 5 of 13
AECOM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE I (Contd.)
Assumptions
The following assumptions are included in the preparation of this Scope of Services and associated fees.
1. The CRS documentation for the HWWS system includes compilation of all available data and
manuals for the existing system only. Creation of a manual for the HWWS can be performed as
an additional service.
«< END OF PHASE I »>
Page 6 of 13
AZCOM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE II
Tasks and services identified in this section are intended to be revised and/or clarified after completion of
Phase I, and are subject to change. Sections below are included for reference only and will be used
for estimating purposes and developing a potential framework of activities.
4 Existing Systems Review/Coordination
An existing system analysis shall be performed to supplement the Needs Assessment Report
prepared as part of Task 1. The existing High Water Warning System (HWWS) analysis shall
consist of analyzing the City's HWWS network as well as networks owned and operated by local
regional agencies and adjoining communities
4.1 City of Fort Worth systems
4.1.1 Identify location and type of existing field sensors
4.1.1.1 Meet with the SWM staff to identify HWWS and Low Water Crossing (LWC)
sensors. Current operational and maintenance plans should also be collected
at this time.
4.1.1.2 Meet with the City's Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to
identify water quality sensors.
4.1.2 Identify coverage area, reliability, and licensing of existing communication networks
4.1.2.1 Meet with City staff to identify communication networks for the existing
HWWS/LWC (discussed with SWM staff in 2.1.1 1)
4.1.2.2 Meet with Public Works and other City departments to discuss
communications networks and to collect current flood response plans.
4.2 Identify adjacent FWS systems
4.2.1 National Weather Service (NWS): Meet with the local NWS staff to discuss and obtain
information on the following aspects of their system
• Location of Radar
• Location and type of field sensors
• Available forecast products
• Data/warning dissemination methods
4.2.2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE): Meet with the local USACE staff to discuss
and obtain information on the following aspects of their system
• Location and type of field sensors
• Coverage area, reliability, and licensing of communication network
• Available forecast products
• Data dissemination methods
4.2.3 Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD): Meet with TRWD staff to discuss and obtain
information on the following aspects of their system
• Location and type of field sensors
• Coverage area, reliability, and licensing of communication network
• Available forecast products
• Data dissemination methods
4.2.4 City of Grand Prairie Meet with City of Grand Prairie staff to discuss and obtain
information on the following aspects of their system
• Location and type of field sensors
• Coverage area, reliability, and licensing of communication network
Page 7 of 13
A=COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE III (Contd.)
• Available forecast products
• Data dissemination methods
4.2.5 City of Colleyville: Meet with the City of Colleyville staff to discuss and obtain
information on the following aspects of their system
• Location and type of field sensors
• Coverage area, reliability, and licensing of communication network
• Available forecast products
• Data dissemination methods
4.2.6 City of Mansfield: Meet with the City of Mansfield staff to discuss and obtain
information on the following aspects of their system
• Location and type of field sensors
• Coverage area, reliability, and licensing of communication network
• Available forecast products
• Data dissemination methods
4.2.7 Other local entities: Meet with the City of White Settlement, City of River Oaks, City of
Westworth Village, City of Benbrook, City of Richland Hills, and any other entities that
own and operate weather and forecast related data collection and dissemination
devices (e g. HAM radio operators, TV stations, etc). As such the following
information shall be obtained from these operators:
• Location of area radars
• Location and type of field sensors
• Communications networks
5 Assessment of Current Available Technologies
Current available technologies in hardware and software shall be assessed to determine the most
suitable technology that can be recommended.
5.1 Hardware: The following type of available hardware shall be assessed:
5.1.1 Field sensors
• Precipitation
• Stream depth
• Stream velocity
• Weather
• Wind (speed & direction)
• Air temperature
• Barometric pressure
• Relative humidity
• Water quality:
• Dissolved oxygen
• pH
• Water temperature
• Conductivity
5.1.2 Communications
• Field Data Collection Platforms (DCPs)
• Wireless communications:
• Terrestrial radio transmitters / repeaters / receivers
• Satellite radio transmitters / receivers
Page 8 of 13
-COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE III (Contd.)
• IR transmitters / repeaters / receivers
5.1.3 Computers
• Processing power
• Data storage
• Networking
• Electrical power
5.1.4 Remote Power Options
• Battery
• Solar
• Grid
5.2 Software. The FloodWorks software shall be assessed and evaluated for the following
functionalities:
5.2.1 Data communications, collection & management
5.2.2 Forecasting
5.2.3 Data publication / warnings & alerts (private & public access)
5.2.4 Hardware redundant fail -over
5.2.5 ESRI compatible
5.3 Services: Currently available services in the following areas shall be evaluated:
5.3.1 Radar / precipitation data collection
5.3.2 Meteorological / hydrological warning
5.3.3 Warning dissemination
5.3.4 Operation and Maintenance
5.4 Prepare report of findings on existing systems, currently available technologies, and
recommendations for the City.
5.4.1 Draft
5.4.2 Final
6 Deferred Phase I Tasks
6.1 Populate structures shapefile from Task 1.3.1.1 (Phase I) with the following tabular attributes
6.1.1 Determine minimum elevation data
• FEMA elevation certificates
• Field surveys (not to exceed $55,000)
6.1.2 Link to appraisal district database (address, owner, value)
6.1.3 Link to 911 database (address, phone number, critical facility)
6.2 Watershed Management: Combine existing watershed CIP plans into a City-wide CIP.
Develop procedures to combine additional watersheds as the plans become available. The
following time and material tasks are currently included, but not limited to, as part of these
services
6.2.1 Obtain existing watershed CIP plans up to a City determined cut-off date.
Page 9 of 13
A=COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE III (Contd.)
6.2.2 Evaluate existing watershed CIP plans and develop a methodology of combining the
CIP models and recommendations in to a city-wide CIP.
6.2.2.1 Prepare a spreadsheet summarizing the CIP improvements recommended.
6.2.2.2 Prioritize the CIP improvements based on Benefit -Cost and City input.
6.2.3 Assist the City with importing the existing CIP plans in to its asset management
software.
6.2.4 Prepare a guidance manual for future watershed CIP plans, with the asset
management software in mind, so that future City consultants can prepare data ready
for import in to the software and reduce time required by City staff for conversion.
6.2.5 Provide the City with a guidance document on importing relevant data from future
watershed CIP plans in to the flood forecasting software recommended in Phase I of
the project.
6.3 Review Emergency Action Plans: Basis of decision and response time data shall be
collected and reviewed from the emergency action plans the City has in place. As such data
shall be collected and reviewed from the following City entities
• Review SWM plans (collected in 2.1.1.1)
• Public Works/other City departments (collected in 2.1.2.3)
«< END OF PHASE II »>
Page 10 of 13
ACOM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE 111
Tasks and services identified in this section are intended to be revised and/or clarified after completion of
Phase II, and are subject to change. This section is currently included for general estimating purposes,
and to layout a potential framework of activities.
7 Develop system recommendations
Systems recommendations shall be provided based on the results of the needs assessment,
existing HWWS system analysis, and technology assessment tasks of this project.
Recommendations on the following system parameters shall be provided based on the results of
the previous tasks.
7.1 System design
7.1.1 Data collection locations
7.1.2 Warning locations
7.1.3 Field hardware specifications
• Sensors
• DCPs
• Communications
• Power requirements
7.1.4 Software specifications
7.1.5 Computer specifications (by location;
7.1.6 System maintenance
7.2 Action plans
7.2.1 Internal actions
7.2.2 Coordinated actions with other entities
7.2.3 Public actions (education)
7.2.4 Training & drills
7.3 Cost estimates
7.3.1 Licensing & permits
7.3.2 Hardware acquisition
7.3.3 Software acquisition
7.3.4 Installation & testing
7.3.5 Operations and maintenance
e.g. EOC, staff office, remote access)
8 System acquisition
During the system acquisition phase, specifications for the hardware and software shall be
prepared and published to solicit bids. The following items shall be performed in this task:
8.1 Prepare specifications
8.2 Publish specifications and solicit bids
8.3 Review bid submittals
8.4 Recommend vendors
Page 11 of 13
A=COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE III (Contd.)
9 System implementation
The following tasks shall be performed to ensure that the recommended system is installed /
implemented according to specifications, and is capable of serving its designed purpose
9.1 Hardware installation oversight
9.1.1 Field sensors
9.1.2 DCPs
9.1.3 Communications system
9.2 Stream gauge discharge ratings
9.2.1 Field survey x-sections
9.2.2 Update hydraulic models
9.2.3 Update runoff parameters for watershed planning
9.3 Software implementation
9.3.1 Install and setup software
9.3.2 Real-time distributed model setup and evaluation with radar rainfall
9.3.2.1 Setup models for targeted basins and locations where flooding identified from
historical events or specified flood -prone areas
9.3.2.2 Generate distributed flow rates at selected locations and calibrate to
available high water mark or stream gauge data
9.3.2.3 Validate peak stage in comparison to historic flood event highwater marks or
streamflow evaluated for selected locations
9.3.2.4 Develop lead-time estimates based on basin response and rainfall intensity
distributions for historic and frequency storms events
9.3.2.5 Develop flow rates and stage formatted for interface with Wallingford
FloodWorks and other modules
9.3.3 Training
9.4 HWWS webpage
9.5 An update will be performed to incorporate new data, forecasts, warnings and alarms into the
existing webpage, along with enhancements to improve usability and reliability for staff and
public use.
9.6 Data Import Protocol
9.6.1 AECOM shall develop a standard protocol of importing data from existing models
prepared by various City contractors in to FWS model thereby providing the City with a
means of continuously updating the FWS model using a streamlined process.
9.7 Prepare Emergency Action Plan
9.7.1 Meet with City EOC staff
9.7.2 Prepare flood response EAPs
9.7.3 Schedule mock drills
9.8 Public education
Page 12 of 13
'COM
ATTACHMENT "A" - PHASE 1I1 (Contd.)
9.8.1 Meet with City public liaison
9.8.2 Prepare public education information (brochures, flyers)
9.8.3 Attend up to 4 public meetings
10 Post event reports (post -implementation additional services)
10.1 Storm analysis
10.2 System analysis
10.3 EAPs analysis
10.4 Recommendations
«< END OF PHASE III »>
Page 13 of 13
ACOM
EXHIBIT "B"
HYDROLOGIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM STUDY
STUDY NO. SWS-043
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE SUMMARY
FEE
PHASE 1 TASKS
Task
1:
Needs
Assessment
$394,000
Task
2* Web
Development
$47,000
$41,000
Management
Deliverables
Task
3:
Project
and
$482,000
SUM)
PHASE 1 TOTAL
(LUMP
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT "B-3A"
(SUPPLEMENT TO EXHIBIT "B")
HYDROLOGIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM STUDY
STUDY NO. SWS-043
Consulting Firm
P RIME ENGINEER
AECOM USA
GROUP, INC.
S UB ENGINEER*
SWG, Inc.
EBG, Inc.
SUMMARY OF TOTAL PROJECT FEES
Prime Responsibility
Engineering, Proj. Mgmt.
Mgmt.
Rain Gauge and Stream Depth
Data; Historic and Radar
Rainfall Analysis
Assessment of technology;
Assist in preparing reports
Amount Percent
$353,191 73.28%
$117,409 24.36%
$11,400 2 36%
Total for Professional Services
$482,000 100%
P roject Description Scope of Services Total Fee
Rain Gauge and Stream (see below) $482,000
Depth Data; Historic &
Radar Rainfall Analysis
SWG, Inc shall participate in performing Tasks 1.1.1, 1.2.1.1, 1.2.1.2, and 1 2 2 as
outlined in Attachment "A".
N on-MWBE Participation
EBG, Inc.
MWBE Fee Percent
$117,409 24.36%
2.36%
EXHIBIT B-3A"
Page 1 of 1
March 10, 2010
Shamsul Arefin,. RE.
Stream Water Group,. Inc.
6737 Brentwwood Stair Rd.
Suite 230
Fort Worth, TX 76112
Subject:. City. of Fort
Services
Dear Mr. Arefin:
AECOM
17300 Dallas Parkway
Suite 1010
Dallas Thxas 75248
w w aecom.com
972 735 3000 tei
972 735 3001 fax
h Flood Warning System Study Rainfall, Stream Flow and Radar
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. intendsto contract with Stream Water Group, Inc., for MWBE
SERVICES on the referenced City of Fort Worth Flood Warning System Study. AECOM TECHNICAL
SERVICES, INC. intends to contract $$117 409 to your firm for rainfall, stream flaw, and radar analysis
services Please acknowledge this commitment by signing below and returning two originals to our
Dallas office (att. Zubin Sukheswaila),
Sincerely,
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC
Daron Butler
District Manager
Shamsul Arefin, P.E.
Stream Water Group, Inc.
3/11/10
Date
CITY OF FORT WORTH
CONTRACT COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM
THIS FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE ROUTING "M & C" BEFORE
LAW DrJPARTMENTAND CITY MANAGER APPROVAL.
To:
From:
Date:
Amy Cannon
(underline appr
Patty Wilso
M/WBE Office Staff
July 8, 2010
Project Manager Buyer Department Director
•
8509
Extension
In the Amount of $482,000.00
SWS-043
DOFJProiect No.
Project/Bid: Flood Warning System Study - Rainfall, Stream Flow and
Radar Services
i
1. Compliance with the City's MIWBE has been achieved by one of the
following methods:
a). AECOM USA Group, Inc. f/k/a TCB is in compliance with the City's M/WBE
ty
Ordinance by committing to 24% M/WBE participation. The City's goal on this
project . tYs j ect is 17%.
b). is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance
.. o .. by
committing to 0 /o M/WBE participation and documenting good faith effort.
..
identified several subcontracting and supplier opportunities. However, the
M/WBEs contacted in the areas identified did not submit the lowest bids. The
City's goal on this project is 0%.
c). is in compliance with City's M/WBE Ordinance by
documenting good faith effort. The City's goal on this' project is 0%.
p �
d). is in compliance with City's M/WBE Ordinance bysubmission
of the prime contractor waiver form. The City'sgoal on this project is %.
0
2. The apparant low dollar bidder (s) did not comply with the City's M/WBE
Ordinance because:
05/11/99
M&C Review
Page 1 of 2
Official site of the City of Fort Worth Texas
FORT WORT,'
ITY OUNCIL GENDA
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 9/14/2010 - Ord. No. 19304-09-2010
DATE: 9/14/2010 REFERENCE NO.: **C-24426 LOG NAME* 20SWDFWS
PUBLIC NO
CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT HEARING'
SUBJECT: Authorize a Professional Services Agreement in the Amount of $482,000.00 with AECOM
U SA Group, Inc., for the Hydrologic Impact Assessment and Flood Warning System Study
Increasing Appropriations in the Stormwater Utility Fund and Decreasing the Unreserved
U ndesignated Stormwater Utility Fund Balance by the Same Amount and Adopt
S upplemental Appropriation Ordinance (ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Adopt the attached supplemental appropriation ordinance increasing appropriations in the
Stormwater Utility Fund in the Amount of $482,000.00 and decreasing the unreserved, undesignated
fund balance by the same amount; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement in the amount of
$482 000.00 with AECOM USA Group, Inc. for the Hydrologic Impact Assessment and Flood
Warning System Study.
DISCUSSION:
The Storm Water Utility was created to address widespread flooding throughout the City. Although
many capital projects are now underway to address known drainage problems, these represent only
a fraction of the storm water infrastructure deficiencies citywide. The Drainage Master Plan currently
underway will take several years to develop in order to identify and prioritize specific solutions to over
$1 billion in drainage needs. A citywide hydrologic impact assessment will assist staff in developing
the master plan by providing specific information on known storm events that will guide study
priorities and aid the calibration of hydrologic models. The flood warning system study will further
build on these models and will examine both monitoring and processing equipment available to
develop a real-time flood warning and flood monitoring system.
In May 2009, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was advertised for the Hydrologic Impact
Assessment and Flood Warning System Study. Fifteen statements of qualifications were received in
response to the RFQ and three firms were interviewed. AECOM USA Group, Inc , was selected to
perform the Hydrologic Impact Assessment and Flood Warning System Study (SWS-043). This study
will be separated into three phases:
Phase I Hydrologic Impact Assessment
Phase II Flood Warning System Study
Phase III Flood Warning System Implementation Plan the Hydrologic Impact Assessment.
This authorization is for funding of services related to Phase I,
The Hydrologic Impact Assessment includes a comprehensive evaluation of 15 known flood events
that analyzes the measured rainfall intensity and resulting high water levels. This phase will be used
to identify potential monitoring locations and structure long term watershed planning efforts A
webpage for internal emergency responders will also be developed as part of this phase.
Phase II will consist of the Flood Warning System Study which will include detailed system analysis
for the High Water Warning System (HWWS), an assessment of available hardware and software
components, and the identification of opportunities for interagency coordination. Phase I and II will be
httn://www. fortworthgov.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=13925 &councildate=9/... 09/30/2010
M&C Review Page 2 of 2
utilized in Phase III to develop specific recommendations and an implementation plan for the
expansion of the HWWS to a real-time flood warning and flood monitoring system.
AECOM USA Group, Inc., proposes to perform Phase I of this study for $482,000.00. City staff
considers this fee to be fair and reasonable for the scope of services proposed based on the extent
of the study. The Storm Water Utility Operating Fund will be used to fund this study.
AECOM USA Group, Inc., is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance by committing to 24
percent M/WBE participation. The City's goal for this project is 17 percent .
This study will include all COUNCIL DISTRICTS.
FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION:
The Financial Management Services Director certifies that upon approval of the above
recommendations and adoption of the attached supplemental appropriation ordinance, funds will be
available in the current operating budget of the Stormwater Utility Fund. Upon approval the
unreserved, undesignated cash balance of the Stormwater Utility Fund will exceed the minimum
reserve as outlined in the Financial Management Policy Statements
TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers
PE69 531200 0209207 $482,000.00 PE69 531200 0209207 $4821000.00
Submitted for City Manager's Office by: Fernando Costa (6122)
Originating Department Head: William Verkest (7801)
Additional Information Contact: Amy Cannon (2289)
ATTACHMENTS
20SWDFW AO(2).doc
httn://vvvvvv. fortworthgov.org/council nacket/mc review_asn7TD=13925&councildate=9/__ 09/30/201(1
CORPORATE AUTHORIZATION RESOLUTION
I, Christopher J. Karpathy, the undersigned Assistant Secretary of AECOM USA, Inc.
(The "Corporation") hereby certifies that: The Corporation is duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State of New York and the attached is a true, accurate and complete copy of a
resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on January 5, 2009, and that said
resolution has not been amended or revoked and is in full force and effect.
I further certify that the authority given in the attached resolution extends to any proposal
submitted to, or any contract entered into with the City of Fort Worth, Hydrologic Impact
Assessment and Flood Warning System Study project; and that any and all transactions by and of
the officers or representatives of the Corporation named in the attached resolution, in its name
and for its account, with the City of Fort Worth are hereby, ratified and approved for all
purposes.
Witness my hand and seal of the Corporation this 5th day of October, 2010.
(Corporate Seal)
Chri
arpathy, Assistant Secretary
1
UNANIMOUS ACTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
AECOM USA, INC.
The undersigned, being all the members of the Board of Directors of AECOM USA, INC. (the
"Corporation"), a New York corporation, proceeding under Section 708 of the New York Business
Corporation Law, hereby take the following action, effective January 5, 2009:
RESOLVED, that in addition to all Senior Vice Presidents and above as set forth
in Article V of the Restated By -Laws as amended, the following persons are
designated with authority by the Board of Directors to execute contracts and other
legal documents on behalf of the corporation or its divisions:
Chris Alario
Randy Altshuler
Paul Anderson
Raylana Anderson
John Azzaro
Jack A. Baylis
Joe Becker
William J. Bent
Jay S. Beratan
Steve Berkenhoff
Steve Biuso
David. Blair
Mark Blanchard
Jim Botz
Tony Bouchard
Cyd Brandvein
Dominique N. Brocard
Joseph Broderick
Tommy Brown
Daron K Butler
Kenneth Butler
Keith T. Campbell
Jay D. Canine
John J. Cardoni
Michael Chalmers
Steven J. Chapin
Donald J. Chelton
Olivia Chen
Min Chu
Lou Cornell
Matt Cummings
Regis F. Damour
Don D'Adam
Sal D'Angelo
Dan Davis
Jim De la Loza
Ashok Dhingra
Joe DiCarlo
Daniel Donahue
Cecil Doyle
Jay Duncan
Scott K. Edelman
Robert Edelstein
Barbara O. Egnor
R. Dan Ellison
John Elorriaga
Joseph Falbo
Dan Faust
Cuneyt Feizoulof
Fitzrandolph C. Fernon
Steven Fowler
Rob Friedel
Mike Gasparro
Mike Gatzow
Bijoy Ghosh
Dave Gorden
Frank Gorry
Allen Goulart
Lee Grant
Kevin Grigg
Gene Grilli
Laurie Gutshaw
Steve GuttenpIan
Dave Gwynn
Christopher I, Hagger
David L. Hardan
Brian T. Harrington
Glen Hartwig
Andrew Haubert
Greg Heath
Roger Heebner
Mike Hegarty
Greg Heinz
Roger L. Herald
David O. Herer
Simon Hernandez
Tom Hessling
Craig L. Hester
Glen M Hille
Jack S. Hodge
Pamla Hoebener
Ben P. Horn
Dave Horton
Richard Howard
David W. Huchel
Gary Hullfish
Robert Jarvis
Robert Johansen
Steven Johnson
Brian L. Jordan
Bruce Kay
Larry Keith
Troy Kincer
John F. Kinneen
James Kunz
Lucy Labruzzo
John M. Lannon
Frank LaPlaca
Carl Lay
Cheryl Lazarro
David Levy
Len Lindahl
Stephen Lipkus
Rae Loui
James K. Lowe, Jr.
Robert Lowe
Mark Lucas
Ian R. MacLeod
Charles Manning
Vic Martinez
Steven Martocello
Tom Marwood
Jamie Matus
Daniel R. McKelvie
Thomas McMonagle
Thomas Meichtry
Thomas Mertens
Dennis Miller
Rudy Mina
Dennis J. Morrison
Joseph Moss, Jr.
Bruce Moulds
Gil Mulhere
Bill Newhouse
Michael K. Nunley
Steve O'Brien
John J. O'Connor
Douglas F. Olbrich
Robert Orlin
Ron Palmieri
Todd Papes
Bijan Pashanamaei
Jon Pearson
James Peter
Steve Peterson
Philip V. Petrocelli
William P. Pfrang
Robert Pittman
RA Plummer
Alan J. Potok
Charles Pound
Robert Reid
Mark P. Reitz
Richard A. Renzi
Jim Richards
Gary W. Rogers
Larry Rosenbloom
Mike Russell
David Ryan
David Sampson
Abbas Sarmad
Achaibar Sawh
Robert Scherpf
Betsy Shreve-Gibb
Jane Siegwarth
Guy E. Slagle
Loren W Smith
Robert J. Smith
Scott Solverson
Thomas A. Spearin
William G. Stewart
Paul Storella
Michael Sweeney
Paul Tarvin
James F. Thompson
Jim Thomson
Christine Tiernan
Louis Tortora
Pam Townsend
Rachel Vandenberg
Jay VanEcho
Ken VanOverberghe
Glen Vasquez
Jake Vittands
Thomas C. Vokoun
Jack Ward
Robert Ward
Charles Williams
Tom Wolf
Alan K. Wong
David Wood
William A. Woodford
Chris Yamaya
Rick Yauney
Jim Zaniboni
Peter Zuk
TN WITNESS WHEREOF, all the Directors have hereunto set their hands effective this
5°' day of January, 2009.
d P. Wolsfeld ' Ira A. Levy
Gregory Sauter Elise R. Greenspan
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, all the Directors have hereunto set their hands effective this
5`" day of January, 2009.
Richard
P. Wolsfeld
Ira A. Levy
Elise R. Greenspan
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, all the Directors have hereunto set their hands effective this
5'1' day of January 2009.
Richard
P. Wolsfeld
Gregory Sauter
Ektiatk. t_.
Elise R. Greenspan