Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 54118 ,, RECEI�/ED CSC No.54118 JUL -9 2020 CITY OF FORT WORTH "YSECREtARy PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement")is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF FORT WORTH(the"City"), a home rule municipal corporation situated in portions of Tarrant,Parker,Denton,and Wise Counties,Texas,as executed by Dana Burghdoff,its duly authorized Assistant City Manager, and THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ("Consultant"),a California nonprofit organization,as executed by Robert Kent,its duly authorized Texas State Director,each individually referred to as a"party"and collectively referred to as the"parties." CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Contract documents shall include the following: 1. This Agreement for Professional Services 2. Exhibit A—Scope of Services 3. Exhibit B- Compensation Schedule All Exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement for all purposes.In the event of any conflict between the documents,theterms and conditions ofthis Professional Services Agreement shall control. 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. Consultant hereby agrees to provide the City w ith a Fort Worth Open Space Prioritization Plan.Attached hereto and incorporated for all purposes incident to this Agreement is Exhibit "A,"Scope of Services,more specifically describing the services to be provided hereunder. Consultant warrants that it will exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence in the performance of its services and will carry out its responsibilities in accordance with customarily accepted professional practices and applicable laws. 2. TERln This Agreement shall commence upon the date of full execution("Effective Date") and shall expire upon completion of services, unless terminated earlier or extended in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement or agreed upon by written amendment to this Agreement by both parties. 3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay Consultant an amount not to exceed$335,000 in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the Payment Schedule shown in Exhibit"B,"which is incorporated for all purposes herein. Consultant shall not perform any additional services for the City not specified by this Agreement unless the City requests and both parties approve in writing the additional scope,schedule, and costs for such services. Either party may seek a change order for a change in scope schedule and costs related thereto,which must be agreed upon by both parties by a written amendment to this Agreement. The City shall not be liable for any additional expenses of Consultant not specified by this Agreement unless the City first approves such expenses in writing.If there is any conflict between the terms of Exhibit "B,"and this Section 3, this Section 3 shall prevail. CITY SECRETARY 4 4. TERMINATION. 4.1. Written Notice. The City or Consultant may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason by providing the other party with 30 days written notice of termination. 4.2 Non-appropriation of Funds. In the event no funds or insufficient funds are appropriated by the City in any fiscal period for any payments due hereunder, City will notify Consultant of such occurrence and this Agreement shall terminate on the last day of the fiscal period for which appropriations were received without penalty or expense to the City of any kind whatsoever,except as to the portions of the payments herein agreed upon for which funds shall have been appropriated. 4.3 Duties and Obligations of the Parties. In the event that this Agreement is terminated prior to the Expiration Date,the City shall pay Consultant for services actually rendered up to the effective date of termination and Consultant shall continueto providethe City with services requestedbythe City and in accordance with this Agreement up to the effective date of termination. 5. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Consultant hereby warrants to the City that Consultant has made full disclosure in writing of any existing conflicts of interest related to Consultant's services under this Agreement. In the event that any conflicts of interest arise after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees promptly to make full disclosure to the City in writing upon its first knowledge of such conflict. Consultant,for itself and its officers, agents and employees, further agrees that it shall treat all information provided to it by the City as confidential and shall not disclose any such information to a third party without the prior written approval of the City, except to the extent that such disclosure is required by applicable law or court order and then only after prior notice to and consultation with the City. Consultant shall store and maintain City Information in a secure manner and shall not allow unauthorized users to access,modify, delete or otherwise corrupt City Information in any way. Consultant shall notify the City promptly if the security or integrity of any City information has been compromised or is believed to have been compromised. 6. RIGHT TO AUDIT. Consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3)years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine at reasonable times any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of the Consultant involving transactions relating to this Agreement at no additional cost to the City. Consultant agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary Consultant facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section.The City shall give Consultant at least five (5) business days' advance notice of intended audits. Consultant further agrees to include in all its subcontractor agreements hereunder a provision to the effect that the subcontractor agrees that the City shall,until expiration of three(3)years after final payment of the subcontract, have access to and the right to examine at reasonable times any directly pertinent books, documents,papers and records of such subcontractor involving transactions related to the subcontract,and further that City shall have access during normal working hours to all subcontractor facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this paragraph. City shall give subcontractor reasonable notice of intended audits. 2 The audit rights conferred by this section shall not permit the City to access records related to the pricing of fixed-price or lump sum amounts,the build-up of agreed rates or unit prices, or Consultant's estimating records. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. It is expressly understood and agreed that Consultant shall operate as an independent contractor as to all rights and privileges granted herein, and not as agent,representative or employee of the City. Subject to and in accordance with the conditions and provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall have the exclusive right to control the details of its operations and activities and be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers,agents, servants, employees,contractors and subcontractors. Consultant acknowledges that the doctrine of respondeat superior shall not apply as between the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, and Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, servants, contractors and subcontractors. Consultant further agrees that nothing herein shall be construed as the creation of a partnership or joint enterprise between City and Consultant. 8. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION. CONSULTANT SHALL RELEASE, DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY AND ITS OFFICERS,AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES FROM AND AGAINST ALL DAMAGES, CLAIMS, LOSSES,DEMANDS, SUITS, JUDGMENTS AND COSTS, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND EXPENSES, FOR PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH) AND THIRD-PARTY PROPERTY DAMAGE TO THE EXTENT CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION OF CONSULTANT, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR SUBCONTRACTORS IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. THE CONSULTANT SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATED OR LIABLE TO THE CITY FOR ANY CLAIM ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT EXCEPT ITS OWNNEGLIGENCE THAT IS THE FAULT OF THE CONSULTANT, AND/OR ITS AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR OTHERS FOR WHOM CONSULTANT IS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, CONSULTANT AGREES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES AGAINST COSTS, DAMAGES, OR LOSSES, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES, RESULTING FROM CLAIMS BY THIRD PARTIES FOR PERSONAL INJURIES (INCLUDING DEATH) OR PROPERTY DAMAGE TO THE EXTENT CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF CONSULTANT, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR SUBCONTRACTORS IN THE PERFORMANCE OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATE TO DEFEND OR INDEMNIFY CITY AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT — (i) The Consultant warrants that all Deliverables, or any part thereof, furnished hereunder, including but not limited to: programs, documentation,software,analyses, applications,methods,ways,and processes(in this Section 8C each individually referred to as a"Deliverable"and collectively as the"Deliverables,")do not infringe upon or violate any patent,copyrights,trademarks,service marks,trade secrets,or any intellectual property rights or other third party proprietary rights,in the performance of services under this Agreement. 3 (ii) Consultant shall be liable and responsible for any and all claims made against the City for infringement of any patent, copyright, trademark, service mark, trade secret, or other intellectual property rights by the use of or supplying of any Deliverable(s)in the course of performance or completion of,or in any way connected with providing the services,or the City's continued use of the Deliverable(s) hereunder. (iii)Consultant agrees to indemnify,defend,settle,or pay,at its own cost and expense,including the payment of attorney's fees,any claim or action against the City for infringement of any patent, copyright,trademark,service mark,trade secret,or other intellectual property right arising from City's use of the Deliverable(s),or any part thereof, in accordance with this Agreement,it being understood that this agreement to indemnify,defend,settle or pay shall not apply if the City modifies or misuses the Deliverable(s).So long as Consultant bears the costand expense of paymentfor claims or actions against the City pursuant to this section 8, Consultant shall have the right to conduct the defense of any such claim or action and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise and to settle or compromise any such claim; however, City shall have the right to fully participate in any and all such settlement, negotiations,or lawsuit as necessary to protect the City's interest,and City agrees to cooperate with Consultant in doing so. In the event City,for whatever reason,assumes the responsibility for payment of costs and expenses for any claim or action brought against the City for infringement arising under this Agreement,the City shall have the sole right to conduct the defense of any such claim or action and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise and to settle or compromise any such claim;however, Consultant shall fully participate and cooperate with the City in defense of such claim or action. City agrees to give Consultant timely written notice of any such claim or action,with copies of all papers City may receive relating thereto.Notwithstanding the foregoing,the City's assumption of payment of costs or expenses shall not eliminate Consultant's duty to indemnify the City under this Agreement. If the Deliverable(s),or any part thereof,is held to infringe and the use thereof is enjoined or restrained or,if as a result of a settlement or compromise,such use is materially adversely restricted, Consultant shall, at its own expense and as City's sole remedy,either: (a)procure for City the right to continue to use the Deliverable(s); or (b) modify the Deliverable(s) to make them/it non-infringing, provided that such modification does not materially adversely affect City's authorized use of the Deliverable(s); or (c) replace the Deliverable(s)with equally suitable,compatible,and functionally equivalent non-infringing Deliverable(s)at no additional charge to City; or(d)if none of the foregoing alternatives is reasonably available to Consultant,terminate this Agreement,and refund all amounts paid to Consultant by the City,subsequent to which termination City may seek any and all remedies available to City under law. 9. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING. Consultant shall not assign or subcontract any of its duties, obligations or rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. If the City grants consent to an assignment,the assignee shall execute a written agreement with the City and the Consultant under which the assignee agrees to be bound by the duties and obligations of Consultant under this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no further liability or obligations under the assigned portion of the Agreement. If the City grants consent to a subcontract,the Consultant shall require such subcontractorto execute awritten agreement with the Consultant referencingthis Agreement and requiring subcontractor to be bound by duties and obligations substantially similar to those of the Consultant under this Agreement as such duties and obligations may apply to the subcontractor's scope of services. The Consultant shall provide the City with a fully executed copy of any such subcontract upon request, with any financial and proprietary information redacted. 10. INSURANCE 4 Consultant shall provide the City with certificate(s)of insurance documenting policies ofthe following coverage limits that are to be in effect prior to commencement of any services pursuant to this Agreement: 10.1 Coverage and Limits (a) Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Aggregate (b) Automobile Liability $1,000,000 Each accident on a combined single limit basis or $250,000 Bodily injury per person $500,000 Bodily injury per occurrence $100,000 Property damage Coverage shall be on any vehicle used by the Consultant, its employees, agents, representatives in the course of the providing services under this Agreement. "Any vehicle" shall be any vehicle owned, hired and non-owned. (c) Worker's Compensation Statutory limits Employer's liability $100,000 Each accident/occurrence $100,000 Disease- per each employee $500,000 Disease- policy limit This coverage may be written as follows: Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas workers' Compensation Act(Art. 8308—1.01 et seq., Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat.) and policy limits for Employers' Liability of $100,000 each accident/occurrence,$500,000 bodily injury disease policy limit and$100,000 per disease per employee. (d) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions) $1,000,000 Each Claim Limit $1,000,000 Aggregate Limit Professional Liability coverage may be provided through an endorsement to the Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy, or a separate policy specific to Professional E&O. Either is acceptable if coverage meets all other requirements. Coverage shall be claims-made, and maintained for the duration of the contractual agreement and for two(2)years following completion of services provided.An annual certificate of insurance shall be submitted to the City to evidence coverage. 10.2 Certificates. 5 Certificates of Insurance evidencing that the Consultant has obtained all required insurance shall be delivered to the City prior to Consultant proceeding with any services pursuant to this Agreement. All policies except Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured thereon,as its interests may appear. All policies except Professional Liability and Employer's Liability shall contain a Waiver of Subrogation for the benefit of the City of Fort Worth.The term City shall include its employees,officers,officials,agent,and volunteers in respect to the contracted services. Any failure on the part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirement. Such terms shall be endorsed onto Consultant's insurance policies. 10.3 Notice of Cancellation. In the unlikely event that TPL's insurance policy is canceled,TPL shall provide a minimum thirty (30) days' notice of cancellation to the City and ten(10)days' notice in the event of non-payment ofpremiums.Notice shall be senttothe Risk Manager,City of FortWorth, 1000 Throckmorton,Fort Worth,Texas 76102,with copies to the City Attorney at the same address. 11. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS. Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws,ordinances,rules and regulations. If the City notifies Consultant of any violation of such laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, Consultant shall promptly desist from and correct the violation. 12. NON DISCRIMINATION COVENANT. Consultant,for itself, its personal representatives,assigns, subcontractors and successors in interest, as part of the consideration herein, agrees that in the performance of Consultant's duties and obligations hereunder, it shall not discriminate in the treatment or employment of any individual or group of individuals on any basis prohibited by law. 13. NOTICES. Notices required pursuant to the provisions of-this Agreement shall be conclusively determined to have been delivered when(1)hand-delivered to the other party, its agents,employees,servants or representatives, (2)delivered by facsimile with electronic confirmation of the transmission,or(3)received by the other party by United States Mail, registered, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: To The CITY: To CONSULTANT: City of Fort Worth The Trust for Public Land Attn: Jennifer Dyke, Stormwater Program Manager Robert Kent, Texas State Director 200 Texas Street 325 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2210 Fort Worth TX 76102 Dallas, TX 75201 Email: Jennifer.Dyke@FortWorthTexas.gov Email: Robert.Kent,,(&tpl.org Facsimile: 817-392-2433 6 14. GOVERNMENTAL POWERS. It is understood and agreed that by execution of this Agreement,the City does not waive or surrender any of its governmental powers. 15. NO WAIVER. The failure of the City or Consultant to insist upon the performance of any term or provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right granted herein shall not constitute a waiver of the City's or Consultant's respective right to insist upon appropriate performance or to assert any such right on any future occasion. 16. GOVERNING LAW/VENUE This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Texas. If any action,whether real or asserted, at law or in equity, is brought on the basis of this Agreement,venue for such action shall he in state courts located in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division. 17. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired. 18. FORCE MAJEURE The City and Consultant shall exercise their best efforts to meet their respective duties and obligations as set forth in this Agreement, but shall not be held liable for any delay or omission in performance due to force majeure or other causes beyond their reasonable control(force majeure),including, but not limited to, compliance with any government law,ordinance or regulation, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, fires, strikes,lockouts,natural disasters,wars,riots,material or labor restrictions by any governmental authority, transportation problems and/or any other similar causes. 19. HEADINGS NOT CONTROLLING. Headings and titles used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be deemed a part of this Agreement. 20. REVIEW OF COUNSEL. The parties acknowledge that each party and its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and thatthe normal rules of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or exhibits hereto. 21. AMENDMENTS /MODIFICATIONS /EXTENSIONS. No extension, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding upon a party hereto unless such extension,modification, or amendment is set forth in a written instrument,which is executed by an authorized representative and delivered on behalf of such party. 7 22. ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains all of the covenants, statements,representations and promises agreed to by the parties. To the extent of any conflict,this Agreement supersedes the terms,conditions, and representations set forth in the City's Request for Proposals, Consultant's Proposal and revised cost. No agent of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by, nor liable for, any covenant, statement, representation or promise not set forth herein. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a written amendment executed by both parties. 23. SIGNATURE AUTHORITY. The person signing this agreement hereby warrants that he/she has the legal authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the respective party, and that such binding authority has been granted by proper order, resolution, ordinance or other authorization of the entity. The other party is fully entitled to rely on this warranty and representation in entering into this Agreement. 24. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH COMPANIES THAT BOYCOTT ISRAEL Contractor acknowledges that in accordance with Chapter 2270 of the Texas Government Code, the City is prohibited from entering into a contract with a company for goods or services unless the contract contains a written verification from the company that it:(1)does not boycott Israel;and(2)will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract. The terms"boycott Israel"and"company"shall have the meanings ascribed to those terms in Section 808.001 of the Texas Government Code. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that Contractor's signature provides written verification to the City that Contractor:(1)does not boycott Israel;and(2)will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in multiples this 8th day Of July ,2020. CITY OF FORT WORTH THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND Dana Burghdoff(Jr 8,2020 Ab CDT) l Dana Burghdoff Robert Kent Assistant City Manager Texas State Director RECOM LIMED BY: WITNESS: William Johnson BY- TPW Department Director Title: ATTEST: M&C: X -01-75 0e104,P0 Mary Kayser City Secretary 1295: aban-=7��50 Date: J u 19,2020 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Christa R.Lopez-Reynolds(Jul 8,20 15: T) Christa R. Lopez-Reynolds Sr. Assistant City Attorney Contract Compliance Manager: By signing I acknowledge that I am the person responsible for the monitoring and adminis tration ofthis contract, including ensuring allperformanceand rep ortingreyui ements. 9erui4f M nd& Jennifer 1.0yke(Jul 7,2 021S3 CDT) Jennifer Dyke StormwaterProgram Manager OFFICIAL RECORD 9 CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH,TX EXIHBIT A Scope 10 -NE. -St 183 Lu 22, ' 1 c f Mtt Olivet a fE,rt Cemetery 771Ilr_, t i t '1 IA ri OF F or.t %lor 91 • i ;t Ft�,v to Ae Imo. I ,r PE Hit th - r :iu(, A PROPOSAL TO The City of Fort Worth Fort Worth Open Space Prioritization Plan THE FOR PUBLIC TRUST MAY 1 1 , 2020 About The Trust for Public Land The Trust for Public Land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. We believe close-to-home access to parks, trails, and the outdoors can transform communities, making them happier, healthier, more equitable, and more resilient to the challenges of the 21St century. In cities across the country, we are working to ensure everyone has access to a quality park or natural area within a 10-minute walk (half-mile) of home. We do this by helping communities plan their park and conservation priorities, fund their visions for their landscapes, protect the lands and waters they value, and create the parks, green schoolyards, and trails they need to thrive. Since 1972, The Trust for Public Land (TPL) has protected more than 3.5 million acres, led the passage of over$75 billion in public funding for parks and conservation, created nearly 2,000 parks, gardens, and greenways, and developed another 2,000+ miles of trails nationwide. Active in Texas for more than 30 years, we have helped create over 40,000 acres of parks and natural areas, from wilderness preserves on the Gulf Coast to urban refuges like Eagle Mountain Lake Park in Tarrant County and the Southwest Nature Preserve in Arlington. Our Research & Innovation team provides best-in-class conservation planning and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) services in support of TPL's mission. The team brings geospatial information to planning, research and design through cutting-edge technology and software architecture that deliver customized and scalable solutions. From artificial intelligence solutions to community-generated data, we use technology to enhance the quality and pace of park creation, land protection and public funding for conservation. Relying on our more than 40 years of experience, we develop city, state, and landscape-scale decision support and data visualization tools that spatially locate community priorities for parks, trails, and open spaces. We apply spatial analysis and the power of GIS mapping to help city and state decision makers and partners better understand how environmental, social, and economic indicators like urban heat, public health measures, and household income can help inform effective community planning and project prioritization. Our field teams and partners leverage these multiple datasets when working with communities to design parks and open space to maximize their benefit and use. We have two free, web-based tools to give everyone access to the information we use to strategically site and improve parks: ParkServe, the most comprehensive database of parks and park need areas for 14,000 U.S. cities and towns, and ParkScore, a ranking of the 100 largest U.S. cities on park access, acreage, investment and amenities. Together these tools provide the data infrastructure to help 2 TPL and our partners fund, site and design parks and open spaces. In Dallas, Houston, and Central Texas we have developed a trio of GIS-based "Decision Support Tools." Accessible via an interactive website, our GIS planning tools are helping these communities make data-driven decisions about their investments in parks, open spaces, and green assists. In 2019 alone, the City of Dallas has acquired over 40 acres of open space identified through a Decision Support Tool created by TPL. Building upon our statewide and national experience in creating impactful city park and open space plans, we are pleased to present this proposal to partner with the City of Fort Worth. r� . Proposed Scope The Trust for Public Land would like to work with the City of Fort Worth to create a long- range open space land acquisition guide for the City. This proposal describes how TPL can help the City of Fort Worth develop a data-based Open Space Prioritization Plan to identify high-priority locations for the City to consider for open space' acquisition and preservation. Included in this proposal is the creation of an interactive web-based Decision Support Tool to allow for interaction with the results and 2 years of tool maintenance and technical support and 1 annual update, and a final report describing analysis methodology, results, and recommendations. 1"Open space"typically refers to lands used for passive recreation,natural or cultural resource preservation and/or agriculture. The term "parks"—in contrast—refers to spaces where residents or visitors would likely go for active recreation,like playing catch with a friend. 3 The Open Space Prioritization Plan is intended to be a plan that will help identify where multiple objectives overlap to provide guidance on where land conservation can be focused to provide the greatest potential benefit across the goals of the program, including: ® Health & Recreation Flood control Water quality Community access, equity, and iconic places Economic development • Ecosystem preservation ' 0 TPL proposes collaborating with the Texas Trees 40 XAS r[REES Foundation for portions of this analysis related to OUN ATION trees and the urban heat island effect. Established in 1982, the Texas Trees Foundation serves as a catalyst in creating new green legacy for North Texas through transformational, research-based projects that educate and mobilize the public to activate the social, economic, environmental, and health benefits that trees and urban forestry provide. Texas Trees has conducted numerous urban forestry studies across North Texas, including the State of the Dallas Urban Forest(2015), Urban Heat Island Management Study(2017), Rowlett Urban Forest Ecosystem Analysis (2018), and Argyle Urban Forest Ecosystem Analysis (2019). A frequent collaborator with TPL, Texas Trees partnered with us in the development of Smart Growth for Dallas, a GIS-based open space Decision Support Tool for Dallas. At the start of the project, The Texas Trees Foundation will generate high resolution tree cover and general land cover data for the 350 square miles encompassing the City of Fort Worth, including parts of the city outside Tarrant County and the ETJ. This high resolution tree canopy data is integral to decision making and ranking at the parcel level. Below:An example of parcel-level tree canopy mapping created by the Texas Trees Foundation Y a Iir iYi •fit -P' - �i V_A 4 With oversight provided by an Open Space Working Group2, TPL will develop the Plan to serve as a guide for the city and their conservation partners to strategically protect and preserve the most important open spaces in the City of Fort Worth. The project objectives are: 1. Evaluate areas to identify potential acquisition and/or preservation opportunities. Prioritization to be based on areas where the priority objectives overlap, providing generalized areas where open space acquisition can be expected to provide benefits for multiple overlapping objective priorities. a. The prioritization should help guide outreach by the city and other land conservation practitioners for investigating voluntary land conservation opportunities in the area.3 2. Support City of Fort Worth in their public outreach. 3. Provide city with interactive mapping tool (the "Decision Support Tool") to strategically identify, compare, and evaluate potential projects for open space acquisition at the parcel level within the generalized overlapping high priority areas. 4. Design and publish a web-based public facing "Story Map" for sharing of analysis results with the general public. 5. Final report describing process, results, feasibility, and recommendations on public funding options to support land conservation and evaluation of policy options to help implement the protection of open space. i -,►f`�_.; \�� R !�ram• o-R` t, ,� -.e'i"y�" ���"�., The Working Group will participate in regularly scheduled in-person and web-based meetings,provide oversight of the project,ensure TPL has access to the best available data for each criteria,and review draft and final analysis results. 3 In some instances,land that is privately owned will be identified as an opportunity area for realizing one or more of the community goals. The mapping and planning done as part of this process does not create any restrictions on privately owned land. To the contrary,it creates more opportunities for private landowners who are interested in selling some or all of the interests in their land. We will develop a tool for prioritizing areas to identify potential acquisition and/or preservation opportunities. 5 Schedule and Tasks The following section provides an overview of the proposed schedule and tasks. The project conveners will be City of Fort Worth staff and TPL. A critical component of project success is an active role for Fort Worth staff in this project, sharing in project management and major tasks with TPL staff. The co-conveners will have one initial in- person meeting and monthly webinars and/or conference calls so that they can be well- coordinated throughout the project. The next section describes the proposed tasks to accomplish this analysis and create its expected products. Task 1.0: Project Initiation (Month 1) • Project conveners will meet by conference call and confirm their roles and responsibilities. • TPL will work with City of Fort Worth agency staff to assemble the Open Space Working Group. The Open Space Working group serves as strategic and technical advisors through the duration of the project and will provide expertise across the project's goals. • Once assembled, TPL will lead an in-person meeting of the Open Space Working Group to gather information needed to get the project started. At this meeting, the Open Space Working group will discuss the criteria to be modeled within each goal and the existing data that can be used in the analysis. Where the data do not exist, the Working Group will help derive a methodology to create a GIS model for the criteria within each Goal. Deliverables (Month 1): • Open Space Working Group contact sheet [provided by City staff]. • Open Space Working Group kick-off meeting summary. • Development of Prioritization Goals and the individual criteria to be modeled within each Priority Goal. • These goals and criteria will be entered into a data dictionary that documents methodology and data sources. • Key staff: Robert Kent, Molly Plummer, Mitchel Hannon, Kristen Weil and Lindsay Withers • Total TPL staff hours: 124 hours Task 2.0: Goals and criteria analysis, development of maps, and Parcel Ranking. Support for Public Meetings (Months 2-5) • TPL will lead 4-5 additional Open Space Working Group meetings via webinar and/or conference call over the course of four to five months. These meetings will focus on developing the goals and criteria analysis results. TPL will build GIS models that define the priority areas for each of the goals and criteria with advice 6 and input provided by the Open Space Working Group and produce maps (PDF, JPG, and PNG) of these results for use in the report and for general distribution. • TPL will identify areas where there is a significant amount of overlap between the individual priority goal results. These areas of overlap will represent the highest priority areas for open space acquisition. TPL will also characterize parcels so that individual parcels within these priority areas can be reviewed. TPL will work closely with the City to determine how parcel data will be utilized in development of the tool and on what maps parcels will be shown and identified. The attributes created through this process will then be made available on the Decision Support Tool website as part of the parcel query and reporting capability. Users will be able to create custom queries to find specific areas of opportunity based on specific set of conditions within these priority areas to allow for flexibility based on the funding or partnering opportunity. • TPL will participate in public meetings organized by City of Fort Worth related to open space planning and preservation. At these meetings, TPL will attend, provide maps, serve as a technical resource, and be available to answer questions from the general public about the project, methodology, and outcomes. Feedback from these meetings will be incorporated into revisions and updates to prioritization models. Deliverables (Month 5): • Completion of GIS models for all goals and underlying criteria, identifying areas of highest priority. • Overall areas of priority created where there is overlap for multiple goals. The overall priority areas will be created through a weighting exercise with the Open Space Working group where each individual goal result is combined to create a weighted overall result depicting priority areas for conservation. • PDF, JPG, and PNG maps of the results. • Individual parcels characterized with degree of overlap with priority Goals and criteria. • Results data made available to City of Fort Worth staff to include in their public outreach in Summer 2020. TPL will provide support staff for the public meetings coordinated by Fort Worth staff. • Key Staff: Robert Kent, Molly Plummer, Mitchel Hannon, Kristen Weil and Lindsay Withers, TPL intern • Total TPL staff hours: 816 hours Task 3.0: Development of Web-Based Decision Support Tool (Months 6-9): • TPL will create a password protected, web-based Decision Support Tool for use by the City. This website will allow for viewing of analysis results along with relevant context and source data layers, down to the parcel level. The parcels for the City that were characterized in Task 2.0 will be viewable. A custom query tool will also be available to query the parcel attributes to find parcels that meet specific user-defined conditions (such as parcels that are high-priority for flood control and ecosystem preservation), and exportable parcel reports will be available for comparison of different opportunities for open space conservation. Deliverables (Month 9): • Password protected website for City of Fort Worth staff to use to evaluate projects at the parcel level, access the results from the analysis, and produce their own custom queries to find parcels that meet specific conditions. • Key Staff: Robert Kent, Molly Plummer, Mitchel Hannon, Kristen Weil, Patrick Smyth • Total TPL staff hours: 146 hours Task 4.0: Development of Public Facing Story Map (Months 10-11): • TPL will develop a public-facing web-based "Story Map" for sharing of Goal and criteria analysis results. Accessible via the internet, this free interactive website will present high-level findings and analysis of the Open Space Prioritization Plan, as well as share information about the project's goals, objectives, methodology, and outcomes. Deliverables (Month 11): • Public-facing web-based Story Map describing process and displaying results. • Key staff: Robert Kent, Molly Plummer, Mitchel Hannon, Kristen Weil, Lindsay Withers • Total TPL Staff Hours: 125 hours Task 5.0: Development of Final Report, public funding feasibility research and policy evaluation (Months 6-12): • TPL, in consultation the City, will compile the results of all prior tasks and activities and include in a final report that describes the methodology of the project. The report will include descriptive pages for the "top 20" highest priority areas for open space preservation identified by the study. • TPL will deliver GIS analysis and source layers to the City in raster or polygon format. • TPL will include an implementation feasibility section in the final report which will include: o Comparative evaluation of conservation easements, dedication, and fee- simple acquisition strategies. s o Feasibility study of potential acquisition funding sources, including general obligation bond packages, Fort Worth Permanent Fund (oil & gas), parkland dedication fees, public improvement districts, stormwater utility, partnerships (e.g. Tarrant Regional Water District), and relevant state and federal conservation programs. Research will include estimated revenue potential, pathways for implementation, and any restrictions related to each potential option. o Review of funding sources with City of Fort Worth legal staff to ensure applicability of each source for the City. o Evaluation of different policy approaches to incentivize open space dedication, such as development density bonuses adjacent to acquired open space. • TPL will evaluate and make recommendations on appropriate departments to participate in and manage open space acquisition, management and maintenance of those lands, and review current policies and development standards such as permittee mitigation for City projects. This evaluation will include: o Conduct internal and external research including a discovery process of existing city goals, policy measures, and staff recommendations as well as a review of best practices from around the country. o Compile case studies. o Recommendations on maintenance of open space once acquired and ways of educating the community on the importance of maintaining these areas in their natural condition. o Identify mitigation mechanisms already in use in City of Fort Worth and conduct interviews with local staff. • Draft a summary report providing recommendations and next steps. • Presentation to city leaders. Deliverables (Month 12): • Final Report • GIS analysis and data layers • Presentation of findings to city leaders • Key Staff: Robert Kent, Molly Plummer, Mitchel Hannon, Kristen Weil, Lindsay Withers, Brendan Shane, Taj Schottland, Wendy Muzzy, TPL National Marketing Director • Total TPL staff hours: 584 hours 9 Task 6.0: Two years of support and one annual update for Decision Support Tool: • Following launch of the Decision Support Tool (Task 3.0), TPL will provide two years of continuous support and an annual update to the website. • As part of the annual update, TPL will collect the most recent conserved lands and city parcel data and rerun the parcel attribution analysis to reflect the latest parcel boundaries and republish to the website. • TPL will also re-run analysis models with any new source data provided to TPL by the City, such as floodplain, habitat, etc. These new models will be incorporated into the Decision Support Tool and other mapping products. • The City will have the ability to manually update the tree canopy data created by Texas Trees Foundation, based on changes to tree canopy that City staff are aware of. • Any GIS analysis or source data layers that change as a result of the annual update will be delivered to the City. • Throughout this time, TPL will offer user support and manage the website infrastructure, individual user names and passwords. • When new parcel data is available from county appraisal districts, TPL will update the Decision Support Tool with this information. • Assuming the Year 1 of the contract begins in the Summer of 2020, the Decision Support Tool will be launched in the Spring of 2021. Once new parcel data is available from the county appraisal districts in the Fall of 2021, TPL will update the Decision Support Tool with this new information. TPL will conduct a full update to the Decision Support Tool in the Spring of 2022. Tool support will then proceed until the conclusion of the agreement in the Summer of 2023. TPL will assist City staff with updating the tool in the Spring and Summer of 2023. Deliverables (Year 1 —3): • Continuous support and management of tool/website infrastructure and individual user names and passwords • One annual update to GIS analysis and Decision Support Tool • Updated GIS analysis and data layers • Detailed documentation and checklist for the City to follow about how to update the tool written during the process of TPLs update in Year 2 • Key Staff: Mitchel Hannon, Patrick Smyth, Kristen Weil, Lindsay Withers • Total TPL staff hours: 194 hours Task 7.0: Transition of Data, Models, and Decision Support Tool to City (Year 5): • At the start of Year 3 of the contract (Summer of 2022), TPL will begin to transition data, models, and website code for the Decision Support Tool to the 10 City for operation on City-owned and managed servers and computers. This process is expected to be complete by the end of Year 3 (Summer 2023), at which time the City will be able to publish and fully manage the Decision Support Tool and it's underlying data. TPL will retire the version on TPL servers and the end of Year 3. • Throughout this process, TPL will provide technical support and assistance to facilitate this transition. This support will include one in-person meeting with relevant TPL staff to assist in the transfer of data, priority models and website infrastructure to City of Fort Worth staff. In addition, over the course of Year 3, TPL will provide web-based support via web meetings (as needed). During these meetings, TPL staff can review issues that City of Fort Worth staff have via a shared screen as they stand up their own model update process and website. • During this time, TPL will assist City staff with running an annual update to the website, data, and tool. Deliverables (Year 3): • Transition of data, models, and website code for the Decision Support Tool to the City of Fort Worth • Transition of Story Map to City of Fort Worth • Document showing all model workflow diagrams (built in Esri Model Builder) • Documentation of all technical assistance provided • Key Staff: Mitchel Hannon, Patrick Smyth, Kristen Weil, Lindsay Withers • Total TPL staff hours: 166 Hours Staff With over 350 staff across the country, TPL has a diverse and deep set of skills it brings to all of its projects, including landscape architecture, economic analysis, GIS mapping, policy development, community engagement, legal analysis, and real estate. Key personnel and qualifications for execution for this proposal are: • Mitchel Hannon, Sr. GIS Analyst, manages and implements projects nationwide in the Large Landscape, Smart Growth and Greenprint programs. He also manages the spatial data development of TPL's Conservation Almanac and TPL's role in the National Conservation Easement Database collaborative effort. Mitchel leads a team of GIS staff and consultants to implement cutting-edge, GIS methodologies, tools and frameworks for conservation projects. Mitchel has a M.S. in Biology from the University of Nevada-Reno and has spent a number of years working on wildlife and conservation issues in the field and through the use of GIS. Since joining The Trust for Public Land in 2005, he has designed 25+ GIS models that cover a diverse set of issues, including water quality and quantity, 11 wildlife habitat, cultural resources, agriculture and recreation. In this project, Mitchel will serve as project lead for The Trust for Public Land. • Robert Kent, Texas State Director, leads our effort to ensure every Texan benefits from the transformational power of close-to-home access to parks, nature, and the outdoors. A Dallas native, Robert received his Bachelor of Arts from Baylor University, where he studied economic and environmental science, and has a Master of Science in Economic Development from the University of Glasgow. Robert joined The Trust for Public Land in 2014, where he led the re- establishment of the organization's North Texas office, passage of a $311 million bond measure to fund parks in Dallas, and the acquisition of over 40 acres of land for two new parks as part of the Five Mile Creek Urban Greenbelt. In this project, Robert will provide oversight and advisory services. • Molly Plummer, Sr. Program Manager, holds a Masters of Landscape Architecture from the University of Texas at Arlington and a Bachelor of Arts in Printmaking and Art History from University of Colorado. Her research is focused on how social resiliency and the urban built environment are impacted by historic landscape architecture and planning mechanisms, particularly in Dallas. Additionally, she has worked as a botanic research assistant determining Texas native plant suitability for urban areas. Since joining The Trust for Public Land, Molly has led several stakeholder-driven projects, including the development our GIS-based Decision Support Tool Smart Growth for Dallas and the Five Mile Creek Urban Greenbelt Master Plan. In this project, Molly will lead our community engagement activities, and assist with analysis and recommendations. • Wendy Muzzy, National Feasibility Research Director, works with the Trust for Public Land's national Conservation Finance team, a group of experts with decades of experience in researching, designing, and passing ballot measures and legislation. She assists state and local government elected officials, their staffs, and nonprofit partners to evaluate the potential to create new sources of public funding for parks through ballot measures, legislative action, and other financing tools. Her work has supported the development and implementation of hundreds of programs creating more than $70 billion in public funds for parks and open space around the country. In this project, Wendy will lead creation of the public funding feasibility report and policy research. • Taj Schottland, Senior Program Manager, has nine years of professional experience working as an adaptation and resilience specialist, project manager, and restoration ecologist. In his current role, he works with Trust for Public Land field staff and diverse cross-sector partnerships across the country to advance multiple-benefit green infrastructure projects in underserved communities. 12 Previously he worked for The National Wildlife Federation where he managed local and regional coastal resilience projects that took a holistic and integrated approach to protecting human communities, priority habitats, and wildlife from threats. Prior to that, he worked for 4 years as a staff scientist for Cardno, a global environmental consulting firm. Schottland holds a BA in Human Ecology with a specialization in Environmental Law and Policy from the College of the Atlantic. In this project, Mr. Schottland will provide research and analysis in support of stormwater management, green infrastructure, and policy. • Patrick Smyth, Sr. Manager Web Application Development, is a graduate of Notre Dame and earned his M.S. in Geographic Information Systems from the University of Wisconsin-Madison where he focused on GIS programming and web map development. In his current role as the Sr. Manager of Web Application Development, he oversees all GIS web applications for the organization over their entire life cycle including scoping, design, development, testing, deployment and project management. Patrick also administers and maintains the organizations ArcGIS for Server platform, Tableau Server deployment and maintains technical specifications for all web-based products and services. • Lindsay Withers, Cartography Manager, is the Cartography Manager on the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) team of The Trust for Public Land, a nationwide organization that creates parks and protects land for people. Lindsay joined The Trust for Public Land in 2012. She is responsible for oversight and delivery of all mapping requests for The Trust for Public Land. She supports mapping requests internally from state offices and programmatic functions, as well as from contract and grant-supported work, and manages the content and use of the organization's ArcGIS Online (AGOL) platform. Prior to working at The Trust for Public Land, Lindsay received a Master's degree in Geography from The George Washington University and worked as an online mapping applications project manager and mapping contractor/research associate within the community health policy field • Matt Grubisich, Director of Operations & Urban Forestry for the Texas Trees Foundation, has been transforming landscapes across Texas for the past 18 years. Matt has worked with dozens of communities across DFW to provide urban forestry assessments detailing the functional, structural, and associated values of our urban trees. Matt has been able to leverage these economic and environmental values to successfully change policy resulting in the preservation of 1000's of acres of wooded lots and creating higher standard for developers to create more sustainable developments. Matt is native to Iowa where he graduated from Iowa State University before coming to Texas in 2000 to work for 13 the Texas Forest Service. Matt is a degreed Forester, Certified Arborist, Certified Forester, and has served in a leadership role on numerous local and state Boards and Commissions. Matt will lead the Texas Trees Foundation's role in the project, including tree canopy and urban heat island analysis. Project Budget Task 1.0: Project Initiative $19,000 Task 2.0: Goals and criteria analysis, development of maps, Parcel Ranking, and Support for Public Meetings $133,000 Task 3.0: Development of Web-Based Decision Support Tool $22,000 Task 4.0: Development of Public Facing Story Map $19,000 Task 5.0: Development of Final Report, public funding, feasibility research and policy evaluation $85,000 Task 6.0: Two years maintenance and support, one update $28,000 Task 7.0: Transition of Data, Models, and Decision Support Tool $29,000 to City TOTAL $335,000 y Thank you ' The Trust for Public Land thanks the City of Fort Worth for considering ' partnership. We believe data-based planning and open space conservation f_ are two of the most important strategies art. utilized by successful cities in the 21 sr - century. This Open Space Prioritization Plan will be the foundation of positive investment in community assets, - transforming the lives of countless Fort k Worth residents for generations to come. We are excited to be a part of that journey with you. Robert Kent, Texas State Director c: 214-957-5527 e: robe rt.kent(o-)-tp1.org 14 EXHIBIT B Compensation Schedule 11 THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND Fort Worth Open Space Prioritization Contract Billing Rates Project Team Member Title Billing Rate Mitchel Hannon Sr GIS Analyst $ 130.00 Matthew Moffa Conservation Planning Project Manager $ 130.00 Lindsay Withers Sr.Cartography Manager $ 130.00 Patrick Smyth Sr.Manager Web Application Development $ 130.00 Lara Miller GIS Sr.Project Manager $ 130.00 Robert Kent Texas State Director $ 190.00 Molly Plummer Parks for People Program Manager $ 100.00 TBD Intern $ 60.00 Wendy Muzzy ConFin Research Director $ 130.00 Brendan Shane Climate Director $ 190.00 Taj Schottland Climate Smart Cities Program Manager $ 100.00 TBD Marketing-Content Writer $ 130.00 TBD Marketing-Designer $ 100.00 od E-L }§\ IZ �,# .•m§; ;!};` - _ -- /!k � }�|■ � _ §! E r : z| , ! !! :! : : B| !! � ! z! :! t ! K| ;! , ! »! !! » ! ;| !! � ! :| !! � ! :! !; » ! :| !; ! \! §2 » /§§ 7/10/2020 M&C Review Official site of the City of Fort Worth,Texas CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORTTII DATE: 6/2/2020 REFERENCE M&C 20- LOG NAME: 20TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND OPEN NO.: 0175 SPACE PLANNING CODE: C TYPE: NOW PUBLIC NO CONSENT HEARING: SUBJECT. Authorize a Distribution in the Amount of$335,000.00 in Income from the City's Mineral Trust Fund, Authorize the Execution of a Contract with The Trust for Public Land in the Amount of$335,000.00 for the Fort Worth Open Space Prioritization Plan, Update FY 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan, and Adopt Appropriation Ordinances (ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council:?? 1. Authorize a distribution in the amount of$335,000.00 in income from the City's Mineral Trust Fund, the Fort Worth Permanent Fund, commensurate with the terms of the amended trust document, distributed from the General Endowment Gas Lease Fund; 2.???Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract in the amount of$335,000.00 with The Trust for Public Land for the Fort Worth Open Space Prioritization Plan (City Project No. 102546); 3.???Adopt the attached appropriation ordinance increasing appropriations in the General Gas Lease Endowment Fund in the amount of$335,000.00; and 4. Adopt the attached appropriation ordinance increasing receipts and appropriations in the Fort Worth Open Space Prioritization Plan in the General Gas Lease Capital Project Fund in the amount of $335,000.00 transferred from the General Endowment Gas Lease Fund (City Project No. 102546). DISCUSSION: Open space or greenspace planning is a process used to preserve important areas of undeveloped land in a natural condition. As the City of Fort Worth experiences growth, it is important to conserve priority undeveloped land areas as open space to support the community's strategic goals and meet multiple public policy objectives. Open space preservation can provide a wide range of benefits, including: health; recreation; flood control; water quality in lakes, streams, and the Trinity River; community access; equity; preservation of iconic places; economic development; and ecosystem preservation. In August, 2019, the City Manager established the cross-departmental city Open Space Stakeholder Group to evaluate options for long-range open space planning and prioritization to preserve select open space. City staff included partners from North Central Texas Council of Governments, Streams &Valleys, Inc., and the Tarrant Regional Water District, and outlined stakeholder goals: (1)to identify the selection criteria for open space planning; (2)to develop open space program objectives; (3)to consider qualifications of The Trust for Public Land (TPL) as an open space planning consultant, and (4)to recommend a consultant and program framework to the City Manager and City Council.??After considering stakeholder goals and providing an Open Space Program presentation to City Council on December 3, 2019, the Stakeholder Group has recommended TPL for the development of the Open Space Prioritization Plan, which includes development of a web-based decision support tool and a public-facing interactive website. The proposed contract will utilize the expertise of TPL to provide an analysis of all existing, public open space and undeveloped land to evaluate areas that may be considered for acquisition to support open space preservation. The web-based decision support tool will assist the City with long-range planning and evaluation of open space parcels for potential voluntary acquisition. Open space selection criteria will be evaluated using Geographic Information System data analysis. The core contract is anticipated to be complete 12 months from execution. TPL will then perform two years of maintenance support and one update of the tool. After the first update in Year 2 of the apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=27744&councildate=6/2/2020 1/2 7/10/2020 M&C Review contract, TPL will begin to transition the tool to the City's IT Solutions Department to support the City's internal data update. At the end of Year 3 of the contract, the transfer and data support will be complete and IT Solutions will be responsible for the maintenance and future update of the tool. TPL will provide professional and planning services, which are exempt from competitive bidding procedures pursuant to Texas Local Government Code 252.022(a)(14). The procurement is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance, and there is no M/WBE requirement on this contract. This work will affect ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS. Funding for this project was not included in the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan because the open space prioritization planning had not begun at the time the citywide CIP was developed. The actions in this M&C will update the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Plan. FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Director of Finance certifies that upon approval of the above recommendations, funds will be available in the capital budgets, as appropriated, of the General Endowment Gas Lease Fund and General Gas Lease Capital Project (General Gas Lease Capital Prj) Fund Open Space Prioritization Plan project. Prior to any expenditure being incurred, the Transportation & Public Works Department has the responsibility to validate the availability of funds. TO Fund Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount ID ID Year Chartfield 2 FROM Fund Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount ID ID Year Chartfield 2 Submitted for City Manager's Office by_ Dana Burghdoff(8018) Originating Department Head: William Johnson (7801) Additional Information Contact: Jennifer Dyke (2714) ATTACHMENTS 5-8-20 20 TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND 13002 A020 rev.pdf 5-8-20 20 TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND 33005 A019 rev.pdf apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=27744&councildate=6/2/2020 2/2