HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 57087-PM1PROJECT MANUAL
FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF
WAYFARE MULTIFAMILY
(CIBOLO HILLS PARKWAY)
IPRC Record No. 21-0090
City Project No. 103516
FID No. 30114-0200431-103516-E07685
File No. W-2790
X File No. X-27026
Mattie Parker David Cooke
Mayor City Manager
Christopher P. Harder, P.E.
Director, Water Department
William Johnson
Director, Transportation and Public Works Department
Prepared for
The City of Fort Worth
November 2021
Peloton Land Solutions
600 W. 6th Street, Fort Worth, Texas
817-562-3350
TBPE Firm No. 12207
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised March 20, 2020
SECTION 00 00 10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Division 00 - General Conditions Last Revised
00 11 13 Invitation to Bidders 03/20/2020
00 21 13 Instructions to Bidders 03/20/2020
00 41 00 Bid Form 04/02/2014
00 42 43 Proposal Form Unit Price 05/22/2019
00 43 13 Bid Bond 04/02/2014
00 45 11 Bidders Prequalification’s 04/02/2014
00 45 12 Prequalification Statement 09/01/2015
00 45 13 Bidder Prequalification Application 03/09/2020
00 45 26 Contractor Compliance with Workers' Compensation Law 04/02/2014
00 45 40 Minority Business Enterprise Goal 08/21/2018
00 52 43 Agreement 06/16/2016
00 61 25 Certificate of Insurance 07/01/2011
00 62 13 Performance Bond 01/31/2012
00 62 14 Payment Bond 01/31/2012
00 62 19 Maintenance Bond 01/31/2012
00 72 00 General Conditions 11/15/2017
00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions 07/01/2011
00 73 10 Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer
Awarded Projects 01/10/2013
Division 01 - General Requirements Last Revised
01 11 00 Summary of Work 12/20/2012
01 25 00 Substitution Procedures 08/30/2013
01 31 19 Preconstruction Meeting 08/30/2013
01 31 20 Project Meetings 07/01/2011
01 32 33 Preconstruction Video 08/30/2013
01 33 00 Submittals 08/30/2013
01 35 13 Special Project Procedures 08/30/2013
01 45 23 Testing and Inspection Services 03/20/2020
01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls 07/01/2011
01 55 26 Street Use Permit and Modifications to Traffic Control 07/01/2011
01 57 13 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 07/01/2011
01 60 00 Product Requirements 03/20/2020
01 66 00 Product Storage and Handling Requirements 04/07/2014
01 70 00 Mobilization and Remobilization 04/07/2014
01 71 23 Construction Staking and Survey 02/14/2018
01 74 23 Cleaning 04/07/2014
01 77 19 Closeout Requirements 04/07/2014
01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data 04/07/2014
01 78 39 Project Record Documents 04/07/2014
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 2 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised March 20, 2020
Technical Specifications which have been modified by the Engineer specifically for this
Project; hard copies are included in the Project’s Contract Documents
Technical Specifications listed below are included for this Project by reference and can be
viewed/downloaded from the City’s website at:
http://fortworthtexas.gov/tpw/contractors/
or
https://apps.fortworthtexas.gov/ProjectResources/
Division 02 - Existing Conditions Last Revised
02 41 13 Selective Site Demolition 12/20/2012
02 41 14 Utility Removal/Abandonment 12/20/2012
02 41 15 Paving Removal 02/02/2016
Division 03 - Concrete
03 30 00 Cast-In-Place Concrete 12/20/2012
03 34 13 Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) 12/20/2012
03 34 16 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair 12/20/2012
03 80 00 Modifications to Existing Concrete Structures 12/20/2012
Division 26 - Electrical
26 05 00 Common Work Results for Electrical 11/22/2013
26 05 10 Demolition for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012
26 05 33 Raceways and Boxes for Electrical Systems 12/20/2012
26 05 43 Underground Ducts and Raceways for Electrical Systems 07/01/2011
26 05 50 Communications Multi-Duct Conduit 02/26/2016
Division 31 - Earthwork
31 10 00 Site Clearing 12/20/2012
31 23 16 Unclassified Excavation 01/28/2013
31 23 23 Borrow 01/28/2013
31 24 00 Embankments 01/28/2013
31 25 00 Erosion and Sediment Control 12/20/2012
31 36 00 Gabions 12/20/2012
31 37 00 Riprap 12/20/2012
Division 32 - Exterior Improvements
32 01 17 Permanent Asphalt Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 01 18 Temporary Asphalt Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 01 29 Concrete Paving Repair 12/20/2012
32 11 23 Flexible Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 29 Lime Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 33 Cement Treated Base Courses 12/20/2012
32 11 37 Liquid Treated Soil Stabilizer 08/21/2015
32 12 16 Asphalt Paving 12/20/2012
32 12 73 Asphalt Paving Crack Sealants 12/20/2012
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 3 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised March 20, 2020
32 13 13 Concrete Paving 12/20/2012
32 13 20 Concrete Sidewalks, Driveways and Barrier Free Ramps 06/05/2018
32 13 73 Concrete Paving Joint Sealants 12/20/2012
32 14 16 Brick Unit Paving 12/20/2012
32 16 13 Concrete Curb and Gutters and Valley Gutters 10/05/2016
32 17 23 Pavement Markings 11/22/2013
32 17 25 Curb Address Painting 11/04/2013
32 31 13 Chain Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 31 26 Wire Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 31 29 Wood Fences and Gates 12/20/2012
32 32 13 Cast-in-Place Concrete Retaining Walls 06/05/2018
32 91 19 Topsoil Placement and Finishing of Parkways 12/20/2012
32 92 13 Hydro-Mulching, Seeding, and Sodding 12/20/2012
32 93 43 Trees and Shrubs 12/20/2012
Division 33 - Utilities
33 01 30 Sewer and Manhole Testing 12/20/2012
33 01 31 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection 03/03/2016
33 03 10 Bypass Pumping of Existing Sewer Systems 12/20/2012
33 04 10 Joint Bonding and Electrical Isolation 12/20/2012
33 04 11 Corrosion Control Test Stations 12/20/2012
33 04 12 Magnesium Anode Cathodic Protection System 12/20/2012
33 04 30 Temporary Water Services 07/01/2011
33 04 40 Cleaning and Acceptance Testing of Water Mains 02/06/2013
33 04 50 Cleaning of Sewer Mains 12/20/2012
33 05 10 Utility Trench Excavation, Embedment, and Backfill 12/12/2016
33 05 12 Water Line Lowering 12/20/2012
33 05 13 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings – Cast Iron 01/22/2016
33 05 13.10 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings – Composite 01/22/2016
33 05 14 Adjusting Manholes, Inlets, Valve Boxes, and Other Structures to
Grade 12/20/2012
33 05 16 Concrete Water Vaults 12/20/2012
33 05 17 Concrete Collars 12/20/2012
33 05 20 Auger Boring 12/20/2012
33 05 21 Tunnel Liner Plate 12/20/2012
33 05 22 Steel Casing Pipe 12/20/2012
33 05 23 Hand Tunneling 12/20/2012
33 05 24 Installation of Carrier Pipe in Casing or Tunnel Liner Plate 06/19/2013
33 05 26 Utility Markers/Locators 12/20/2012
33 05 30 Location of Existing Utilities 12/20/2012
33 11 05 Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 12/20/2012
33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe 12/20/2012
33 11 11 Ductile Iron Fittings 12/20/2012
33 11 12 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe 11/16/2018
33 11 13 Concrete Pressure Pipe, Bar-Wrapped, Steel Cylinder Type 12/20/2012
33 11 14 Buried Steel Pipe and Fittings 12/20/2012
33 12 10 Water Services 1-inch to 2-inch 02/14/2017
33 12 11 Large Water Meters 12/20/2012
33 12 20 Resilient Seated Gate Valve 12/20/2012
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 4 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised March 20, 2020
33 12 21 AWWA Rubber-Seated Butterfly Valves 12/20/2012
33 12 25 Connection to Existing Water Mains 02/06/2013
33 12 30 Combination Air Valve Assemblies for Potable Water Systems 12/20/2012
33 12 40 Fire Hydrants 01/03/2014
33 12 50 Water Sample Stations 12/20/2012
33 12 60 Standard Blow-off Valve Assembly 06/19/2013
33 31 12 Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) 12/20/2012
33 31 13 Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe for Gravity Sanitary Sewers 12/20/2012
33 31 15 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Sanitary Sewer 12/20/2012
33 31 20 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe 06/19/2013
33 31 21 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Closed Profile Gravity Sanitary Sewer
Pipe 12/20/2012
33 31 22 Sanitary Sewer Slip Lining 12/20/2012
33 31 23 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Enlargement 12/20/2012
33 31 50 Sanitary Sewer Service Connections and Service Line 04/26/2013
33 31 70 Combination Air Valve for Sanitary Sewer Force Mains 12/20/2012
33 39 10 Cast-in-Place Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 20 Precast Concrete Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 30 Fiberglass Manholes 12/20/2012
33 39 40 Wastewater Access Chamber (WAC) 12/20/2012
33 39 60 Epoxy Liners for Sanitary Sewer Structures 12/20/2012
33 41 10 Reinforced Concrete Storm Sewer Pipe/Culverts 07/01/2011
33 41 11 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe for Storm Drain 12/20/2012
33 41 12 Reinforced Polyethlene (SRPE) Pipe 11/13/2015
33 46 00 Subdrainage 12/20/2012
33 46 01 Slotted Storm Drains 07/01/2011
33 46 02 Trench Drains 07/01/2011
33 49 10 Cast-in-Place Manholes and Junction Boxes 12/20/2012
33 49 20 Curb and Drop Inlets 12/20/2012
33 49 40 Storm Drainage Headwalls and Wingwalls 07/01/2011
Division 34 - Transportation
34 41 10 Traffic Signals 10/12/2015
34 41 10.01 Attachment A – Controller Cabinet 12/18/2015
34 41 10.02 Attachment B – Controller Specification 02/2012
34 41 10.03 Attachment C – Software Specification 01/2012
34 41 11 Temporary Traffic Signals 11/22/2013
34 41 13 Removing Traffic Signals 12/20/2012
34 41 15 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon 11/22/2013
34 41 16 Pedestrian Hybrid Signal 11/22/2013
34 41 20 Roadway Illumination Assemblies 12/20/2012
34 41 20.01 Arterial LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 20.02 Freeway LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 20.03 Residential LED Roadway Luminaires 06/15/2015
34 41 30 Aluminum Signs 11/12/2013
34 41 50 Single-Mode Fiber Optic Cable 02/26/2016
34 71 13 Traffic Control 11/22/2013
00 00 00
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Page 5 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised March 20, 2020
TxDOT Standard Specifications: Adopted by the Texas Department of Transportation
November 1, 2014. Standard specifications are incorporated into the contract by reference
and can be viewed/downloaded from TxDOT’s website at:
https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot-info/des/spec-book-1114.pdf
TxDOT Standard Specifications Last Revised
TxDOT 450 Railing 11/01/2014
TxDOT 466 Headwalls and Wingwalls 11/01/2014
Appendix
GC-4.01 Availability of Lands
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
GC-4.04 Underground Facilities
GC-4.06 Hazardous Environmental Condition at Site
GC-6.06.D Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance
GC-6.07 Wage Rates
GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities
GC-6.24 Nondiscrimination
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
END OF SECTION
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 1 of 6
1 0241.1106 16" Pressure Plug 02 41 14 EA 1 1,000.00 $1,000.00
2 0241.1118 4"-12" Pressure Plug 02 41 14 EA 2 1,153.26 $2,306.52
3 3305.0109 Trench Safety 33 05 10 LF 2,917 1.00 $2,917.00
4 3305.0202 Imported Embedment / Backfill, CSS 33 05 10 CY 1.1 87.02 $95.72
5 3311.0001 Ductile Iron Water Fittings w/ Restraint 33 11 11 TN 3.13 4,750.00 $14,867.50
6 3311.0261 8" PVC Water Line 33 11 12 LF 84 50.00 $4,200.00
7 3311.0461 12" PVC Water Pipe 33 11 12 LF 110 70.00 $7,700.00
8 3311.0557 16" DIP Water, CLSM Backfill 33 11 10 LF 81 150.00 $12,150.00
9 3311.0561 16" PVC C905 Water Pipe 33 11 12 LF 2,642 115.50 $305,151.00
10 3312.0001 Fire Hydrant 33 12 40 EA 1 3,480.00 $3,480.00
11 3312.1002 2" Combination Air Valve Assembly for Water 33 12 30 EA 2 10,500.00 $21,000.00
12 3312.2804 8" Water Meter and Vault 33 12 11 EA 2 27,202.67 $54,405.34
13 3312.3003 8" Gate Valve 33 12 20 EA 2 1,850.00 $3,700.00
14 3312.3005 12" Gate Valve 33 12 20 EA 2 2,100.00 $4,200.00
15 3312.3006 16" Gate Valve w/ Vault 33 12 20 EA 5 20,544.00 $102,720.00
16 3312.4314 36" x 16" Tapping Sleeve & Valve 33 12 25 EA 1 35,350.00 $35,350.00
17 3312.6002 6" Blow Off Valve 33 12 60 EA 1 23,500.00 $23,500.00
1 3201.0616 Conc Pvmt Repair, Arterial/Industrial 31 01 29 SY 52 105.02 $5,461.04
2 3311.0261 8" PVC Water Line 33 02 61 LF 673 50.00 $33,650.00
3 3305.0109 Trench Safety 33 05 10 LF 673 1.00 $673.00
4 3312.3003 8" Gate Valve 33 12 20 EA 2 1,850.00 $3,700.00
5 3311.0001 Ductile Iron Water Fittings w/ Restraint 33 11 11 TN 0.32 4,750.00 $1,520.00
UNIT IA: WATER IMPROVEMENTS (CITY-DEVELOPER COST SHARE)
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Bidder's Proposal
Description
TOTAL UNIT IA: WATER IMPROVEMENTS (CITY-DEVELOPER COST SHARE)$598,743.08
Project Item Information
Bidlist Item
No.
UNIT PRICE BID Bidder's Application
Specification
Section No.
Unit of
Measure
Bid
Quantity Unit Price Bid Value
UNIT IB: WATER IMPROVEMENTS (100% CITY COST)
TOTAL UNIT IB: WATER IMPROVEMENTS (100% CITY COST)$45,004.04
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP-BLANK.xls
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 2 of 6
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Bidder's Proposal
Description
Project Item Information
Bidlist Item
No.
UNIT PRICE BID Bidder's Application
Specification
Section No.
Unit of
Measure
Bid
Quantity Unit Price Bid Value
1 3137.0102 Large Stone Riprap, dry 31 37 00 SY 378 135.00 $51,030.00
2 3301.0002 Post Construction CCTV 33 01 31 LF 855 2.00 $1,710.00
3 3301.0101 Manhole Vacuum Testing 33 01 30 EA 6 174.87 $1,049.22
4 3305.0109 Trench Safety 33 05 10 LF 855 1.00 $855.00
5 3305.0112 Concrete Collar 33 05 17 EA 6 479.92 $2,879.52
6 3331.3201 6" Sewer Service 33 31 50 EA 1 280.00 $280.00
7 3331.4208 12" Sewer Pipe
33 11 10
33 31 12
33 31 20 LF 570 55.00 $31,350.00
8 3331.4212 12" DIP Sewer 33 11 10 LF 285 150.69 $42,946.65
9 3339.1001 4' Manhole
33 39 10
33 39 20 EA 6 4,650.00 $27,900.00
10 3339.1003 4' Extra Depth Manhole
33 39 10
33 39 20 VF 26 225.00 $5,850.00
TOTAL UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $165,850.39
UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP-BLANK.xls
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 3 of 6
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Bidder's Proposal
Description
Project Item Information
Bidlist Item
No.
UNIT PRICE BID Bidder's Application
Specification
Section No.
Unit of
Measure
Bid
Quantity Unit Price Bid Value
1 0241.0800 Remove Rip Rap 02 21 13 SF
1,706 2.06 $3,514.36
2 0241.4401 Remove Headwall/SET 02 41 14 EA
1 4,150.00 $4,150.00
3 3137.0102 Large Stone Riprap, dry 31 37 00 SY
265 90.00 $23,850.00
4 3305.0109 Trench Safety 33 05 10 LF
2,387 1.00 $2,387.00
5 3341.0201 21" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
193 56.00 $10,808.00
6 3341.0202 21" RCP, Class IV 33 41 10 LF
8 66.00 $528.00
7 3341.0205 24" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
1,280 68.00 $87,040.00
8 3341.0302 30" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
183 125.00 $22,875.00
9 3341.0303 30" RCP, Class IV 33 41 10 LF
248 135.00 $33,480.00
10 3341.0402 42" RCP, Class III 33 41 10 LF
105 175.00 $18,375.00
11 3341.1401 7x3 Box Culvert 33 41 10 LF
370 475.00 $175,750.00
12 3349.0001 4' Storm Junction Box 33 49 10 EA
9 7,600.00 $68,400.00
13 3349.0002 5' Storm Junction Box 33 49 10 EA
1 9,500.00 $9,500.00
14 3349.0102 4' Manhole Riser 33 49 10 EA
2 6,500.00 $13,000.00
15 3349.6001 10' Recessed Curb Inlet 33 49 20 EA
9 5,100.00 $45,900.00
16 3349.6003 20' Recessed Curb Inlet 33 49 20 EA
1 8,100.00 $8,100.00
17 466 6010 Headwall (CH-FW-0) (DIA=42 IN)TxDOT 466 EA
1 6,200.00 $6,200.00
18 466 6178 Wingwall (PW-1) (HW=3 FT)TxDOT 466 EA
1 41,350.00 $41,350.00
UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $575,207.36
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP-BLANK.xls
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 4 of 6
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Bidder's Proposal
Description
Project Item Information
Bidlist Item
No.
UNIT PRICE BID Bidder's Application
Specification
Section No.
Unit of
Measure
Bid
Quantity Unit Price Bid Value
1 0241.0100 Remove Sidewalk 02 41 13 SF 49 1.00 $49.00
2 0241.1300 Remove Conc Curb&Gutter 02 41 15 LF 1,016 12.00 $12,192.00
3 3110.0101 Site Clearing 31 10 00 LS 1 2,640.00 $2,640.00
4 3123.0101 Unclassified Excavation 31 23 16 CY 12,656 3.50 $44,296.00
5 3124.0101 Embankment by Plan 31 24 00 CY 5,573 3.00 $16,719.00
6 3125.0101 SWPPP ≥ 1 acre 31 25 00 LS 1 18,700.00 $18,700.00
7 3137.0102 Large Stone Riprap, dry 31 37 00 SY 24 90.00 $2,160.00
8 3211.0400 Hydrated Lime 32 11 29 TON 179 160.40 $28,711.60
9 3211.0502 8" Lime Treatment 32 11 29 SY 8,530 3.25 $27,722.50
10 3213.0301 4" Conc Sidewalk 32 13 20 SY 2,750 55.13 $151,607.50
11 3213.0501 Barrier Free Ramp, Type R-1 32 13 20 EA 2 1,942.50 $3,885.00
12 3213.0506 Barrier Free Ramp, Type P-1 32 13 20 EA 2 1,942.50 $3,885.00
13 3217.0001 4" SLD Pvmt Marking HAS (W)32 17 23 LF 712 1.33 $946.96
14 3217.0003 4" BRK Pvmt Markings HAS (W)32 17 23 LF 4,304 1.33 $5,724.32
15 3217.0201 8" SLD Pvmt Marking HAS (W)32 17 23 LF 712 2.65 $1,886.80
16 3217.0501 24" SLD Pvmt Marking HAE (W)32 17 23 LF 176 16.10 $2,833.60
17 3217.1002 Lane Legend Arrow 32 17 23 EA 8 247.25 $1,978.00
18 3217.1004 Lane Legend Only 32 17 23 EA 8 287.50 $2,300.00
19 3217.2104 REFL Raised Marker TY II-C-R 32 17 23 EA 108 4.92 $531.36
20 3291.0100 6" Topsoil 32 91 19 CY 650 13.80 $8,970.00
21 3292.0400 Seeding, Hydromulch 32 92 14 SY 5,714 1.17 $6,685.38
22 3441.4003 Furnish/Install Alum Sign Ground Mount City Std. 34 41 30 EA 12 416.98 $5,003.76
23 3441.4108 Remove Sign Panel and Post 34 41 30 EA 1 169.76 $169.76
24 3471.0001 Traffic Control 34 71 13 MO 1 3,750.00 $3,750.00
25 450 6051 RAIL (HANDRAIL)(TY E)TxDOT 450 LF 108 162.00 $17,496.00
26 9999.0001 10.5" Conc Pavement 32 13 13 SY 7,793 95.03 $740,568.79
27 9999.0002 10.5" Commercial Drive Approach 32 13 20 EA 2 22,575.00 $45,150.00
28 9999.0003 End of Road Barricade 34 41 30 EA 1 914.25 $914.25
29 9999.0004 Curb Ramp (At Cibolo Hills Pkwy and BUS 287) 32 13 20 EA 2 1,942.50 $3,885.00
UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS $1,161,361.58
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP-BLANK.xls
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 5 of 6
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Bidder's Proposal
Description
Project Item Information
Bidlist Item
No.
UNIT PRICE BID Bidder's Application
Specification
Section No.
Unit of
Measure
Bid
Quantity Unit Price Bid Value
1 2605.3015 2" CONDT PVC SCH 80 (T)26 05 33 LF 1,105 22.00 $24,310.00
2 3441.3302 Rdwy Illum Foundation TY 3,5,6 , and 8 34 41 20 EA 19 1,600.00 $30,400.00
3 3441.3352 Furnish/Install Rdway Illum TY 18 Pole 34 41 20 EA 15 2,555.00 $38,325.00
4 3441.1645 Furnish/Install Type 33A Arm 34 41 20 EA 16 479.00 $7,664.00
5 3441.3051 Furnish/Install LED Lighting Fixture (137 watt ATB2 Cobra Head)34 41 20 EA 16 700.00 $11,200.00
6 3441.3502 Relocate Street Light Pole 34 41 20 EA 4 1,970.00 $7,880.00
7 3441.1502 Ground Box Type B, w/Apron 34 41 10 EA 19 1,000.00 $19,000.00
8 3441.3411 Reconnect Conductor 34 41 20 EA 40 155.00 $6,200.00
9 3441.1410 NO 10 Insulated Elec Condr 34 41 10 LF 2,330 1.55 $3,611.50
10 3441.1408 NO 6 Insulated Elec Condr 34 41 10 LF 6,695 2.65 $17,741.75
11 9999.0000 Remove Existing Ground Box 34 41 10 EA 1 400.00 $400.00
12 9999.0001 Remove Existing Conduit and Conductors 34 41 10 LF 890 1.15 $1,023.50
UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS $167,755.75
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP-BLANK.xls
00 42 43
DAP - BID PROPOSAL
Page 6 of 6
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Bidder's Proposal
Description
Project Item Information
Bidlist Item
No.
UNIT PRICE BID Bidder's Application
Specification
Section No.
Unit of
Measure
Bid
Quantity Unit Price Bid Value
1 3305.0109 Trench Safety 33 05 10 LF 2,642 1.00 $2,642.00
2 3311.0001 Ductile Iron Water Fittings w/ Restraint (12") 33 11 11
TN 3 4,750.00 $14,250.00
3 3311.0457 12" DIP Water, CLSM Backfill 33 11 10 LF 81 164.10 $13,292.10
4 3311.0461 12" PVC Water Line 33 11 12 LF 2,642 70.00 $184,940.00
5 3312.1002 2" Combination Air Valve Assembly for Water 33 12 30 EA 2 12,800.00 $25,600.00
6 3312.3005 12" Gate Valve 33 12 20 EA 5 2,100.00 $10,500.00
7 3312.4313 36"x12" Tapping Sleeve and Valve 33 12 25 EA 1 19,750.00 $19,750.00
8 3312.6002 6" Blow Off Valve 33 12 60 EA 1 21,500.00 $21,500.00
$292,474.10
This Bid is submitted by the entity named below:
BIDDER:BY:
IMS Construction
5690 Watermelon Rd.
Suite 400 TITLE:
Northport, AL 35473 DATE:
120
END OF SECTION
UNIT IA: WATER IMPROVEMENTS (CITY-DEVELOPER COST SHARE)
Total Alternate Bid
$165,850.39
$575,207.36
Bid Summary
President
CONTRACT commences to run as provided in the General Conditions.
$2,713,922.20Total Construction Bid
UNIT II: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT III: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT IV: PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
UNIT V: STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
Contractor agrees to complete WORK for FINAL ACCEPTANCE within working days after the date when the
UNIT IA: WATER IMPROVEMENTS (CITY-DEVELOPER COST SHARE)
Alternate Bid
UNIT IB: WATER IMPROVEMENTS (100% CITY COST)$45,004.04
$1,161,361.58
$167,755.75
$598,743.08
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS - DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Version May 22, 2019 00 42 43_Bid Proposal_DAP-BLANK.xls
nn;y ��
ia:��• rxe��u,��.iEir:� no� s r�� n•:ai�•:vr
r;�s�• � „r f
SEC'C'IUN {1[1 �t5 12
❑Af'— PRI�t�LJAI,[FIC'A'i iL]�' SI-A-I'E�I�IENT
�:ach F31C�L�L'I" IS fLC�llll'LCI lC] C0111��IClL' t�1C 111E�C]111t16R E7e�p�i' hy ]{jeilllf�'111�� tlie pr�c�ti�alifie�3 contractors
andlor sub�ontractars ���l�om they intend lo utilice for thc inajor �4ark lvpe{s) listccl. In thc "i�1ajnr �,�Vc�rk
Tvpe" hn� p�n�•ide tlle �amp�cte cil�jnr �vnrI: t�e and act�ial descriptioi� as prr�ti�l�d h�' tj�e G1'ater
Qepartment for �uater arid se«°et- ai�d Tf'VV foR� ra.•inY.
M�jor V+'or�: 'i G�p� C:ontractarlSubcantractor Ca�n��an} Prcqualification
NamL L;s iratior� 17ate
�o�zcrete Pa�•inU X1T Pa�rin� and Canstz�uctioii [nc. Olfa112a24
Cnnstructin�i'Recnnslr�iction
(I5.000 s uare ��ards and GRE��TER}
Se�ver Cc�lleclinn 5ytilc:m, T}e��elnpiliei�t, Bandera [J�i]ity Conira�lors U�4f3U12�2?
] �., and Srnaller �
1�'al�r "fr.�nsmissioiti. f.)cvelap�r��nl, ?�l" aitcl � F3ai�c�er� �ltility Cnntr�iclnrs 0�13L11?a?3
Srn�ll�r
I�O�iCj4ti'�l� �IlCI PL'CIL'Sll'1111 l.i��E�tii��� � ]3ean Eiectrica] inc. 4�1091?(l?3
TIZe unciersi�i�ed I�ereh} cerlilies that the contructcars andlor suhent�tra�tors dcsci�ibed in the t�4�le a6a�e
are currently pr�c�ualiiiecl io� lhc titi���rl� ty�acs ]istcd.
k3li]UE[Z:
[1175 L�nstruction
iG9U i�vatcrm�lot� EZd
5ui [e �100
�lortllpart, �L, 3�473
�,
F3Y: ,��� �f�.+-r�
�l � ��gn e}
TiTLE: I '�'''�
UATE: � �.��r��
r
FNI) (7F S�CTIt7N
CITY OF FORT 4V[]RiH
SYANpARp CpNSTRVCTI4N PREQl1ALIFICATIQI STRTEMENT � OEVELOPER AL'JnR�E� PftOlECTS
Od 15 12 PreRualifica�ipn Sta'ement 2015
Fprm V@IS�G� SCptPmhGr 1, 20iS
�"oRT �o��r��
Decemb�r 03, 202�
Mr fVl ,leffrey Hicks
Bandera Utility Contractors Inc
�16 Interchange St
McKinn�y, TX i507�
f'Fi�Q�fAL.iFICA7'!ON 7� �1� CITY QF FORT WORTW WATER !]�PAR7M�N�" PROJEGTS
Dear Mr. Wicks;
Thank you far your su�mittal o� infnrm�kion and data toward �requ�lificafion ta perfarm aurwork.
1Ne are pleased to advise that your pr�qua�ification has been finalized, A bid limit $73,0�1,2a9.80
has been established for your arganization based on #he financial data submitked.
Yaur firm is ptequalifie�d to perform the fallawing work;
-- Wastewater IVl�.ins (12" and under) far New p�velopment using O�en Cut construction methads
-- Water M�ins ('16" and under) for New Deveiopm�nt using Open Cu# cons#ructian methods
7h� prequalification and bid limif established a�ave will remain currer�t through 4l3p12022
This date was es�ablished to be sixteen (96) months fram t�re date of the mast recent financia� st�#�m�nt
received, uRless rescinded for cause,
Shauld you desire prequalific�#ian in the future �eyond t}�e �forerr�entianed, submit#al of updated financials, work
experience, and equipmer�t lisf w�ll be necessary fpr this department to esfablish a new bid lirnit. Please �e
advised that th� plans and d�cumeh#s for t�e work io be performed must be submitted ta and appraved 6y the
City of Fort Worth Waier Qeparfinent.
We appreciate yaur interesf in ouE war�C and �hould y�u hav� some q�aestion in this ar other matters withirs our
�urview, pl�as� do nof hesitate to cor�#��t Mr. Jqhn Kasavich at (8�7)382�8480 ar Norm� 5�uceda af (817)392-
6056.
Yours very truly
� �� � � � � �
• ��
�� Chris Harder, p.�.
Water �ir�ctor
Faxt Worth
�
An�Ammlca c�tM
����11.�
���s•1943+7011
MAIL 7.�� John Kasavich, P.E.
Fort Worth Water b��artmer�t
�ng;neering & Regulatory Services
20Q T�xas 5treet
Fort Wort�, 7X 76�0�
W,A,TER DE�AIZ'1'11+��;NT
'1']Ili CI'fY OF �'DR'l' WOR'I'E[ * 2U[1 Tr.xns 5•3•�err�r � E�C7fi'f WOR7'H, Tr•.xns 761Q2
$17-3t)`L-S`L4U * �'nx Sl 7-392-8195
�;. Prin[ed on rer.yclr.d pnncr
January 14, 2022
XIT Paving and Construction Inc.,
3934 US 287
Waxahachie, Texas 75165
Attn: Doug Spradley
RE: PREQUALIFICATION RENEWAL FOR PAVING PROJECTS
City of Fort Worth
Dear Mr. Spadley:
The City of Fort Worth Department of Transportation and Public Works has reviewed the
material that you submitted for prequalification renewal to perform street paving in the
City of Fort Worth. This letter is to advise you that XIT Paving and Construction Inc.,
has been deemed qualified to bid upon and perform the following type(s) of street paving
improvements:
CONCRETE PAVING CONSTRUCTION/RECONSTRUCTION – UNLIMITED
ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION/RECONSTRUCTION – UNLIMITED
ASPHALT MAINT - UNLIMITED
This prequalification is effective January 1, 2022 and your project bid limit is
$1,852,170.00 based upon the submitted financial statement. It shall remain in place for
two (2) years as long as you remain in good standing with the City of Fort Worth. Prior
to the end of the two years, you will be required to submit an updated financial statement
for prequalification renewal consideration in accordance with the City specifications.
In the interim, if you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Edgar J. Garcia
Construction Manager
Transportation & Public Works Dept.
Cc: file
004526-1
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW
Page 1 of 1
1
fa
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1$
19
�a
2 J.
22
23
24
25
25
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
SECiION 40 45 26
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPEf�SATIO�f LAW
Pursuant to Texas Labor Code 5ection 4D6.046(a�, as amended, Contractor certi�ies that it
pro�ides worker's compensation insurance co�erage for all of its employees emplayed on City
Project No. 103516. Contractor further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code, Section
406.096(b), as amended, it will pro�ide to City its subcontractor's certificates of compliance with
worker's compensation co�erage.
CONTRACTOR:
IMS Construction
Campany
5690 Watermelan Road, Suite 400
Address
Northport, AL 35473
City/State/Zi p
THE STATE pF I(.�.UC� �
COUNTY OF E�L �L(.{UCl/LL.
§
§
By: Keith lones
�ease t)
. ��-t/�
Signature:
Title: President
(Please Printf
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on #his day personally appeared
�'�,e ti'� i�l �o �1 �S , known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the fo�egoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the
same as the act and c€eed of �f�S�G���-'� for the purposes and
consideratian therein expressed and in tf�e capacity therein s#ated.
GIVEN U�4�ER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this day of
7��cern �6e� , zo�.� %"
a'�a
Notary Public i and for the State of �LJ ttiCG�
�mssaesaos
36 aA���ja C jZ��sf� EIVD OF SECTION
q �, .ve ..
a ti. �� °� �
v ;,
37 4 � ��T `��y.'o •
�. r
m e � � �€s � a
_ ..
� = � b
: T'� • ,e'L fg ��G : c;' 4
CITYO��1°V4fORTH .'�� �„'°
STANDAf�� UtT€�]N�F6��ICATION DOCVMENTS
Revised Apri�l�9 d R"�� a��
@681�
Wayfare Muitifami4y (Cibolo Hiils Parkway)
Cfty ProjeGt No. 103516
00 52 43 - 1
Developer Awarded Project Agreement
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised June 16, 2016
SECTION 00 52 43 1
AGREEMENT 2
3
THIS AGREEMENT, authorized on __12/6/2021___is made by and between the Developer, 4
Wayfare Development Group – Cibolo Hills, LLC, authorized to do business in Texas 5
(“Developer”), and IMS Construction, authorized to do business in Texas, acting by and through 6
its duly authorized representative, (“Contractor”). 7
Developer and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree 8
as follows: 9
Article 1. WORK 10
Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the 11
Project identified herein. 12
Article 2. PROJECT 13
The project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part 14
is generally described as follows: 15
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)________________________________________ 16
City Project No. 103516________ ____________________________________________ 17
Article 3. CONTRACT TIME 18
3.1 Time is of the essence. 19
All time limits for Milestones, if any, and Final Acceptance as stated in the Contract 20
Documents are of the essence to this Contract. 21
3.2 Final Acceptance. 22
The Work will be complete for Final Acceptance within 120 working days after the date 23
when the Contract Time commences to run as provided in Paragraph 12.04 of the 24
Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 25
3.3 Liquidated damages 26
Contractor recognizes that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Developer 27
will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in 28
Paragraph 3.2 above, plus any extension thereof allowed in accordance with Article 10 29
of the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded 30
Projects. The Contractor also recognizes the delays, expense and difficulties involved in 31
proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the Developer if the Work is not 32
completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof , Contractor agrees 33
that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay 34
Developer zero Dollars ($0.00) for each day that expires after the time specified in 35
Paragraph 3.2 for Final Acceptance until the City issues the Final Letter of Acceptance. 36
00 52 43 - 2
Developer Awarded Project Agreement
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised June 16, 2016
Article 4. CONTRACT PRICE 37
Developer agrees to pay Contractor for performance of the Work in accordance with the 38
Contract Documents an amount in current funds of Two Million Seven Hundred Thirteen 39
Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars and Twenty Cents ($ 2,713,922.20). 40
Article 5. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 41
5.1 CONTENTS: 42
A. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between Developer 43
and Contractor concerning the Work consist of the following: 44
1. This Agreement. 45
2. Attachments to this Agreement: 46
a. Bid Form (As provided by Developer) 47
1) Proposal Form (DAP Version) 48
2) Prequalification Statement 49
3) State and Federal documents (project specific) 50
b. Insurance ACORD Form(s) 51
c. Payment Bond (DAP Version) 52
d. Performance Bond (DAP Version) 53
e. Maintenance Bond (DAP Version) 54
f. Power of Attorney for the Bonds 55
g. Worker’s Compensation Affidavit 56
h. MBE and/or SBE Commitment Form (If required) 57
3. Standard City General Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer 58
Awarded Projects. 59
4. Supplementary Conditions. 60
5. Specifications specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment 61
or, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of 62
Contents of the Project’s Contract Documents. 63
6. Drawings. 64
7. Addenda. 65
8. Documentation submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award. 66
9. The following which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the 67
Agreement and, if issued, become an incorporated part of the Contract 68
Documents: 69
a. Notice to Proceed. 70
b. Field Orders. 71
c. Change Orders. 72
d. Letter of Final Acceptance. 73
74
75
00 52 43 - 3
Developer Awarded Project Agreement
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised June 16, 2016
Article 6. INDEMNIFICATION 76
6.1 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own 77
expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all 78
claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by 79
the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under 80
this contract. This indemnification provision is specifically intended to operate and be 81
effective even if it is alleged or proven that all or some of the damages being sought 82
were caused, in whole or in part, by any act, omission or negligence of the city. This 83
indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, 84
expenses and legal fees incurred by the city in defending against such claims and causes 85
of actions. 86
87
6.2 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, 88
the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage 89
or destruction of property of the city, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work 90
and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, 91
subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this contract. This indemnification provision 92
is specifically intended to operate and be effective even if it is alleged or proven that all 93
or some of the damages being sought were caused, in whole or in part, by any act, 94
omission or negligence of the city. 95
96
Article 7. MISCELLANEOUS 97
7.1 Terms. 98
Terms used in this Agreement are defined in Article 1 of the Standard City Conditions of 99
the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects. 100
7.2 Assignment of Contract. 101
This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents may not be assigned by the 102
Contractor without the advanced express written consent of the Developer. 103
7.3 Successors and Assigns. 104
Developer and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal 105
representatives to the other party hereto, in respect to all covenants, agreements and 106
obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 107
7.4 Severability. 108
Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be unconstitutional, void or 109
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction shall be deemed stricken, and all 110
remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon DEVELOPER and 111
CONTRACTOR. 112
005243-4
Developer Awarded Project Agreement
Page 4 of 4
113 7.5 Go�erning Law and Venue.
114 This Agreement, including alf af the Contract Documents is perfarmable in the State of
115 Texas. Venue shal! be Tarrant Caunty, 'iexas, or the United States District Court for the
116 Northern District of Texas, Fart Worth Di�isifln.
117
118 7.6 Authority to Sign.
119 Contractor shall attach evidQnce of authority ta sign Agreement, if other than duly
120 authorized signatory of the Contractor.
121
122 IN WiTNE55 WHEREDF, De�eloper and Contractor have executed this Agreement in muitiple
1Z3 counterparts.
124
125 This Agreement is effective as af the last date signed by the Parties ("Effective Date"j
126
Co ntractor:
!MS Constructinn
�y; ��
{Signature}
Keith Jones
De�elaper:
Wayfare Development GroUp — Cibolo Hills, LLC
By. �
��
(Signaturej
H. lackson Wallace
(Printed iVamej
Title: President
IMS Construction
Company Name:
Address: 5690 Watermelon Road
Suite 400
City/State/Zip:
Northport, AL 35473
Date
127
(Printed Name)
Title: President and C.E.O.
Wayfare Development Group — Cibolo Nills, LLC
Company name:
Address: 5690 Watermelon Road
Suite 40�
City/Sta�e/Zip:
North�ort, AL 35473
�aJ�la i
Date
CITY OF FORT WqRTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Ni115 ParkwayJ
STANQAiia CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DQCUMEN75— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised June 16, 2D15
�
Z
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1�
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
TH� STATE QF TExAS
C�UNTY �F TARRANT
§
§
SECTION OD 62 19
MAINTENANCE BDN❑
60N❑ N�. 6D086I43
ooszs9-1
MAIf�TENANCE 90fV❑
Page 1 af A
§ KNqW ALL BYTHESE PRE5ENT5:
That we IM5 Construction , knawn as
"Principal" herein and Capitol Indemnity Corpvratian , a corporate surety
{sureties, if more than ane) duly authorized ta do business in the 5tate of Texas, knawn as
"Surety" herein �whether one or mare}, are held and firmly bound unto the De�eloper, Wavfare
Cibolo Hills L�C, autharized tQ do business in Texas �"�e�eloper"} and the City af Fort Worth, a
Texas muni�ipal cor}�oration �"City"}, in the sum of 7wo Million 5even Hundred T�irteen Nine
Hundred Twenty-Twa ❑allars and Twenty Cents f$z,713,922.Z01, �awful maney of the United
5tates, to �e paid in Fart Worth, Tarrant �ounty, Texas, for payment af which sum we�l and truly
be made �ointly unto the De�eloper and the City as dual vbligees and their successors, we bind
oursel�es, our heirs, executors, atiministrators, successors and assigns, jointly and se�erally,
firmfy by these presents.
2fl WHEREAS, Qe�eloper and City have entered into an Agreement for the constru�tion of
21 eammunity facilities in the City of Fort W�rth by and through a Cammunity Fatilities Agreement,
22 CFA Numk�er 21-01Q4; and
23
24
25
26
27
2$
29
WHEREAS, the Printipa! has entered inta a certain wriften contract with the De�eloper
awarded the f�� ��'`day of �" 2fl�, which Contraet is
hereby referred to and a made part hereof for all �urposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish
all materials, equipment labar and other accessories as defined f�y law, in the prosecution of the
Work, inGluding any Work resulting from a duly authorized Change �rder {calEecti�ely herein,
the "Vllarfc"j as pro�ided for in said Contra�t and designated as Wav�are Multifamilv [Cihalo Hills
Parkwa ;and
CITY aF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily {Cibolo Ffrfls Perkway}
STAN�AR� CITY CON017i0N5 — OEVEL�PER AWARDED PR01ECT5 City Project No. I03516
Revised Janvary 31, Z�12
❑0 62 i9 - z
MA3NTENANCE SDN�
Page 2 of 4
1
z WHEREAS, Prin�ipal binds itself t❑ use such materials and to so construct the Work in
3 accordan�e with the plans, specifications and Cantract Dacumer�ts that the Work is and will
4 remain free from defects in materials or workmanship for and during the period of two (2} years
5 afterthe date af Final Aceeptance af the Work by the City {"Maintenance Period"}; and
�
7 WHfREAS, �rincipal 6inds itself to repair ar reconstruct tf�e Wark i� whole or in part upon
8 re�eiving �otice from the beveloper and�ar City of the need thereof at any time within the
9 Maintenance Period.
3.0
11 NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if Prin�ipal shall rernedy
12 any defecti�e Work, for which timely notice was pro�ided by Qevelvper or City, to a eampletion
13 satisfactory to the City, then this obligation sha�l become null and void; otherwise to remain in
14 full for�e and effe�t.
15
1b PROVI�ED, HaWEVER, if Principal shall fail so to repair or reconstruct any timefy
17 noticed defecti�e Wark, it is agreed that the �eveioper or City may cause any and all such
18 defective Work to be repaired andlar recanstructed with all assaciated costs thereof heing
19 porne by the PrinGipal and the Surety under this Maintenance 8ond; and
20
z1 PROVIf]ED FURTHER, that if any legal a�tion be filed on this Band, �enue shall lie in
22 Tarrant Caunty, Texas or the United 5tates i7istrict Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort
23 Worth IJi�isian; and
�
25 RRDVIDEa FUftTH�R, that this obligation shall be continuous in nature and s�ccessi�e
25 recaveries may be had hereon for successi�e breaches.
CI7Y pF FORT WORTH Wayfare Mukti4amily {Ci6alo Flills PorkwQyj
STAN6ARD CITY CON�ITIOIVS— DEVELOPER AWARQEfl PRp1ECi5 Cr[y ProjettNQ. I035I6
Revised January 31, 2�12
oab2lg-3
MAiNTENANLE 8�N❑
Page 3 of 4
1 IN WITNESS WNEREOF, the Principal and the 5urety have each SIGNED and SEALED this
z instrument by duly authorized agents and of�icers on this the 7th day of February
� , za�.
4
� PRINCIPAL:
6 IM5 Construttion
7
S
9
1D
11 ATTEST:
12
13 ��
14 �Prfn pal} Secretary
15
16
17
1$
19
2�
21
�Z
23
24
25
26
27
Witness as ta Principal
CITY OF FpRT WQRTH
STANDAR� CfTY C�NRI710N5 � OEVELOPER AWARDED PROlECTS
Re�ised January 31, 2012
8Y: �
5ignature
Keith lones, President
Name and Title
Address: 5690 Watermefon Raad
5uite 4��
Northport, AL 3547_3
Wayfare Multifamily {Crbolo fiiNs PQrkwayj
Ciry Projecr Na. 2035Ifi
�
�
3
4
5
6
7
$
9
so
11
�z
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
�fl
21
22
006219-4
MAfNTE�tANCE BOND
Page 4 of 4
ATTEST:
{5urety) Secretary
1
Witness as to Surety
SURETY:
Capitol Indemnity Corporation
�
=� � 1. , � -- -
BY; ��-� -
.. _ i �
Signature
Barry �age, Attorney-in-Fa�t
Name and Title
Address: 1600 Aspen Commons
Suite 3DQ
Middleton, WI 53562
7elephane Number: t��$�82g-42D0
*Nflte: If signed hy an ❑fficer of the Surety Company, there must be an file a certified extratt
fram the k�y-laws shawing that this person has authority to sign such ❑hiigation. If
Surety's physicaE address is different from its mailing address, both must be pro�ided.
The date ❑f the bond shall not he priar to the date the Contract is awarded.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
57ANOARD CITY COND171pN5— OEVELOPER AWARDED PR�JECTS
Re�ised lanuary 31, 2fl12
Wayfare Multifamily �Cibofo Hills Parkwayj
Crry Praject No. I43516
C';�PITOL 1'�iDEMti1TY C��tPORATI�N � � D$ 6�, 4 3
YC}WER �F ATTOI�LyEY
K\[)11 :�f.1. ]il:ti Rl" I'}fl:SF: PfiE:ti3:\ I ti I lia[ �fte C"APIl (11. ]tiflf:tlti[�'1' C'[3i21'(Nt.�"I iQti. :3 �urrnr<�iinn ni'tlie 5tat� n? !i is�nnsi:i. ii�i��n�� ii,
��rir.� i��:�� n('':.�ti i:i +.ht t;�< <�I �li�?�L'��n�:. 1� i;��u;,:,i. cln�, �i�:il.�. :, ,;,u��.�r :icJ :i�,�,�.�i.n
-- ----------------- --�--....i3r'11��Y' P11Cil:: f31�f:NNA PAC�-----------�---------------------------------------------
it� n�ec anJ la«fl�f :ltt�tirn��[�f-in-Ihri. t�ti i;i,il.�..���cnr. ,e.:l :in.i �.I:I �.: !�.•r ::��i nu ii. h�lwll. a, su��'•.. anci as its arS an�1 i1c�d.:�rt� a3id akl :���r.dn.
i::idertakin�s and �:��nt�.��t. •.�I ;i;rct•..hiF�. ��rn��ili•�d +.h:n n�• hnn�l n, czu!�ri.il.ir:�� or ii�;nrarl i�t suren.li�n .�r�utrd u�uE�r thi; auU�nrit�,.hali rxcrc�i i:�
:��nnun[ ihc sum nl"
-------------------------.�1.�. wR1TTEN 1NSTRl!yT�\TS Ilti .4V A�1Ul��]T �[]TTD EXt'LED: 5?[1.D{7[],nim--------------________
1 hi> Pn�+ri n:.l[Enin�� i.,�i:i�it.J ::nii i� ,i�n�cl :ci�i ;�,iirJ `.•� i::c.�i�ii!: �:n�l•�r::ir,', h� ihr.iuil���ni� :�� ih� �.,iln.� r, • fi�.nl�i:iun .i:'.��,�i�•cl hti ,;i: f3�:irc:
��i' llir�ctors ul C'Al'IT(}E. llUF�1iti11 Y L[)RPURAI'1[]ti :3a a iz��ctii?�� ilul} «]Ic�l :ux! h�l�l im th� I�ti� c1:3y f�€� �]ay. �UU?
'}iF:5(]L�'ED, th�t t}ic Presidcnt, C_xec€�ti�e 4'icc Presidcn�, Vice Presiden[. Se�re�ary urTrc:zsurer, acting indi�idually or �ah�•�«�,r �,c an�i ��i�� hcr�h�
:�re s�rantcJ �he pc��vcr and ai�thorizatio�� i<� spPQint hy a Po�ti•�r nf'Attc�rncy for th� E�i�rpos�s aniy of exc�uiins� anil stiLSisi�g hnc�,i• ,3nS uiul�.i:;}.�n,�.•.
and oii�rr �tiriaie3gs nbli�atory i3i ii�c itau�rc ther�c�f, one nr ntor� iesid��i� �icc-rresidenis. as�is�a��i secretaries aiid at�ar�icy{,]-i�rfact, eac�t appairi��r i�
I�a.� th� pc�ti�er4 aizd du�iey usu:i} so si�ch oflices Lo �he husuarss oS'ihi� CL7R3�l311V; tilC til�iSi3(Lki'C oE such ut'ficcrs ai�d sta] a1'the Gcint�nny rn.iy he aIf i��J
w any su�h pnwcr of attornry nr �n any crnificaic rcl:itio�g �hereiu by tiicsiritite, ancE any� tiitch ��a���cr e�f'aliorncy ur �crtit7cai� hcaring Surf� #'an�;n�lr
.i�rnatures or f�icsimilc scal shall he �alid and bin�fine u�o3� ihe C:um��any. and 7ny si«h 3�o�v�r,fl c�ecutc�i and cer�ificd by #�ac.imilc sigo�at��res and
Iacsimile seal shail be �alid and bi3�clin� u�wi� �he Cuntpauy i3t tite fiiture ��•iih respect fo au� l�nnd ❑r �ulJertakin� e�r [�tl�er ��ritit�g o�iii �a[nry in ii�i
riaEure �herrui'to which i� is attachocE. R�iy such app�imune�r� may hr r��e�k�c9. For cause. or N ithoul c3use, hy an� af said ofticers, �t any time."
i\ �� fZ'��;SS �:'l-lFREOF, �h� C::�YI"1 L1L i�l3C�1\I'�'1 ('(1HE'[)�i�17 iD1 has caused tlxse pres�ms tn he sigi�ed 6y iss orfic�r u„ae�s��n�d and iF�
���r�ii>rs�te +CE3� !« hC hrrctu a!3ixed ciul}� a��ested. thiti 2n�f c�ay ��I May. ?UE 1.
., �"`"L;�e+�;r�'''y�w. w.
.�`�' Sj4f Cpq� q..
:���.�`�� CpRPOArl]E '���%'..
:° c;, — � — `'y :;,
= SEAL :=
�:
CA PlTpi. I\ C?E:'1] ti 1"F]' C[IRPi]H:I E 1[ 11
�� � ��
na, x! F. i'.�ul.
C[:O & Prrsid�nt
Si';1t'f: L]F 14'15C�'`tiSI� } • ,:�z;,�: • �::::'
� $.S.r :;:1;gryMSYm!IA10.4C�''�..,
C'Ui.��Tv n� na,�r
[7c3 �he ?c3d day ol� ti1ay, 2� E 1 beFar� me �crsonally ram� David F. Pauly, ts� mc knnH n. titi hn b�ioi � bJ �ne diily ti+voru, did dc:pose a�id say tha� fzr rrsiete,
�n thc C"nw3ty �f Dane. 51ate Uf 4l'iscoi�5in: llia[ he is I'resident af C.�P[TO�. E\]lf; Iltil l'1' C(IRPORA"C[i}�, Eh� corporaiinEi de;cribrd lierein ;�i�d
�+f�irh rxccuted tlie ahcrre insuzim�nt: th;�t hi kno�c:� [hc s�:�l �,l�th� sa«i �i�r�nr:�tie�n. tl�a� tht ;e:il :j1�l��d tu ;:�id icas�rusi�er5t i., such enrEi��r,�i. ,c�l' 1�i:il
is ��:s; .c, affi�..d h� ��rd�s' ��I ih:_ Et:rinl �.�1�f7�r�rrc�:, ��i s:ii�! c��r��n�:�aini:.�r,d �h::i f:� �i �ncr iii n:m�c tl:rrr:n `.,, :il.� nrii.:r
ulctit:
��"r�''��
�z,�h<<��� ��. n���t, �i�
Pres�d�nt
Surcty S Fideli�y [Jperatians
51:1If: UF 1V[ti(:tf\tilti
r S.S.
[ �]Ui�`FY O�' �Af�E ]
o�.ra�E�
. ,y .
KRJEGER
C'1:R} �f !CA] C
��� �
�)aI11C� 1�1' �{iGl:t��f
tio[ary PiEE�lic, fla�� ['c�„ 4Vi
11y C'omm��sinn Is f'erm:�ncnt
I. �h❑ isndcr�igned, deoly eiectrd to ihe nffice sl:ite[I hclnn. nn�� �hc mrui�il��nt in CAi'I'E'OL I\DE�9til�f�' CC?!iP[7RATFCI�. ,3 W�s�c,ns�n
C u3porukon, authoriz�d to niakc lhis rertiJi�;it�. f7U HEItEFiI' ('F:12 Cfl l ihai [h: finegninp attacEied Po�ver ut Ai[nrncy rcmains in tuil fbrie and hac
nut becn ri�•nked; arzd tunh�r�nurr. �hai tht• Kc,��lu[iun c}1 [h� fioard nl El:rr,+.�or,_ ;�t li�r[fe in tiic !'o�+ir uf :1[[c�mc�• is non i�� inrcr.
Signed anJ SC�IICcI �t Ii1C L�ilc c31� �9id�l�[rni. S[:�1�' col ll i=cuii.�n rl:iz --�� ---- cf,t} c�f ��y� .?��'Y
. -��i. � � r
.SEA�. � �
���f V _ V �
Al�i� 5. [7��i■��e
• �'� 5ecreiar}•
!lllti U{lC'LiL9�N f ES \UT 1'�1LI17 i.'til.l.�ti !'RI�1 ['L•f7 C]R CfR:�Y SflAl);'fl k3rOC'K[iR[3Utif) 14'1TEi �i RF€7 SI'RIA�.?�L1�L3�R iti'1'E�l: L:PPC:R
12i[i!l"I FEr�ti1J C'U12Vt;I2. If' `�'{7L II:11'f�: A\1' [3L�l:5TIL]?v5 C:C3V('[:R��.':C � fiF:' :1�' IFIE.:�1Tf[�ITY E3�' FHIS C3()C'[;1�1[:AYT ('ALL HO[}-d7�-d4�t].
• _� _ _-�_- ``-`.� � --� .-y -_. � ;� __. ..ti _ '_�_�' -.�..- -:_-. -..�-s`�
s u: i�:,.� , � i � �==z=:=:=
c� -x-
.,�'_ .��?
i �_
i�ilff 1u��1�! <�i1N+lrf T ��4r`''`C'.
��� A �.�H ��} 4 i� :' i�r' �, •;� :�iF� !� � �i:+ " � '��
i e�� �ii�� �' �� a�:���i ��?T� i�i:�. e+f�:
`-.�:�' .•: J.tiM_ {.�.!O }!.ii: :.•: ...,�.,•.• .y{• i +
ACKN�WLEDGMENT
A notary pufaiEc ar ather ofFicer completing this
certificate verifies or�ly the identity of the individual
who signed the do�ument t❑ whi�h this �ertificate is
attached, and not t�e #ruthfulness, accuracy, ❑r
vaiidit of that dacument.
5tate af California
County ❑f Sacramento }
Dn ����Z�Z� before me, �olleen M P�ge, Not�ry PubliG
{insert name and title of the �fficer}
personally appeared garry Page
wha proved to me an the basis of satisfactary evidence to be the person(s} whose name�s} islare
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged ta me that helshelthey executed the same i�
hislherltheir authorized capacity(ies}, and that by hislherltheir signature{s} an the instrument the
p�rson�s}, ar the entity upon behalf of which the person{s} acted, executed the instrument.
I Gertify under PENALTY OF PERJIJRY under the laws �f the State af Califarnia that the foregaing
paragraph is true and correct.
��LLEEN �1. PACE
- connM. �����ra �
WiTN�SS m hand and �fficial seal. � Notary Pubtic • Calitarnis '�
Y Saeramento Caun�
Cwrrn. Ex ' Nov. 1 , �
5ignature �`' � � �y-� {5eal}
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS
OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Article 1 – Definitions and Terminology .......................................................................................................... 1
1.01 Defined Terms ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.02 Terminology .................................................................................................................................. 5
Article 2 – Preliminary Matters ......................................................................................................................... 6
2.01 Before Starting Construction ........................................................................................................ 6
2.02 Preconstruction Conference .......................................................................................................... 6
2.03 Public Meeting .............................................................................................................................. 6
Article 3 – Contract Documents and Amending ............................................................................................... 6
3.01 Reference Standards ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents .................................................................. 6
Article 4 – Bonds and Insurance ....................................................................................................................... 7
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers ..................................................................................................... 7
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds ........................................................................ 7
4.03 Certificates of Insurance ............................................................................................................... 7
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance .................................................................................................................. 9
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace ........................................................... 12
Article 5 – Contractor’s Responsibilities ........................................................................................................ 12
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent ................................................................................................. 12
5.02 Labor; Working Hours ................................................................................................................ 13
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment ........................................................................................... 13
5.04 Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 14
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals” ....................................................................................................... 14
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors) ..................................... 16
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others ................................................................... 16
5.08 Wage Rates.................................................................................................................................. 18
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties ........................................................................................................... 19
5.10 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................................. 19
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas ....................................................................................................... 19
5.12 Record Documents ...................................................................................................................... 20
5.13 Safety and Protection .................................................................................................................. 21
5.14 Safety Representative ................................................................................................................. 21
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs ............................................................................................. 22
5.16 Submittals .................................................................................................................................... 22
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee .......................................................................... 23
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.18 Indemnification ........................................................................................................................... 24
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services .............................................................................. 24
5.20 Right to Audit: ............................................................................................................................ 25
5.21 Nondiscrimination....................................................................................................................... 25
Article 6 – Other Work at the Site ................................................................................................................... 26
6.01 Related Work at Site ................................................................................................................... 26
Article 7 – City’s Responsibilities................................................................................................................... 26
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals .............................................................................................. 26
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities ....................................................................................... 26
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program ............................................................................................... 27
Article 8 – City’s Observation Status During Construction ........................................................................... 27
8.01 City’s Project Representative ..................................................................................................... 27
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work .................................................................................................. 27
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work .......................................................................................................... 27
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed .......................................................................................... 28
Article 9 – Changes in the Work ..................................................................................................................... 28
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work ............................................................................................... 28
9.02 Notification to Surety .................................................................................................................. 28
Article 10 – Change of Contract Price; Change of Contract Time ................................................................ 28
10.01 Change of Contract Price ............................................................................................................ 28
10.02 Change of Contract Time............................................................................................................ 28
10.03 Delays .......................................................................................................................................... 28
Article 11 – Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal or Acceptance of Defective Work ...................... 29
11.01 Notice of Defects ........................................................................................................................ 29
11.02 Access to Work ........................................................................................................................... 29
11.03 Tests and Inspections .................................................................................................................. 29
11.04 Uncovering Work ....................................................................................................................... 30
11.05 City May Stop the Work ............................................................................................................. 30
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work ................................................................................ 30
11.07 Correction Period ........................................................................................................................ 30
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work ............................................................................................. 31
Article 12 – Completion .................................................................................................................................. 32
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title ................................................................................................... 32
12.02 Partial Utilization ........................................................................................................................ 32
12.03 Final Inspection ........................................................................................................................... 32
12.04 Final Acceptance ......................................................................................................................... 33
Article 13 – Suspension of Work .................................................................................................................... 33
13.01 City May Suspend Work ............................................................................................................ 33
Article 14 – Miscellaneous .............................................................................................................................. 34
14.01 Giving Notice .............................................................................................................................. 34
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.02 Computation of Times ................................................................................................................ 34
14.03 Cumulative Remedies ................................................................................................................. 34
14.04 Survival of Obligations ............................................................................................................... 35
14.05 Headings ...................................................................................................................................... 35
00 73 10- 1
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 1 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 1 – DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
1.01 Defined Terms
A. Wherever used in these General Conditions or in other Contract Documents, the terms listed
below have the meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof,
and words denoting gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter. Said terms are
generally capitalized or written in italics, but not always. When used in a context consistent with
the definition of a listed-defined term, the term shall have a meaning as defined below whether
capitalized or italicized or otherwise. In addition to terms specifically defined, terms with initial
capital letters in the Contract Documents include references to identified articles and paragraphs,
and the titles of other documents or forms.
1. Agreement - The written instrument which is evidence of the agreement between Developer
and Contractor covering the Work
2. Asbestos—Any material that contains more than one percent asbestos and is friable or is
releasing asbestos fibers into the air above current action levels established by the United
States Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3. Business Day – A business day is defined as a day that the City conducts normal business,
generally Monday through Friday, except for federal or state holidays observed by the City.
4. Buzzsaw – City’s on-line, electronic document management and collaboration system.
5. Calendar Day – A day consisting of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight.
6. City— The City of Fort Worth, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, acting by,
its governing body through its City Manager, his designee, or agents authorized pursuant to
its duly authorized charter on his behalf.
7. Community Facilities Agreement (CFA) -–A Contract between the Developer and the City
for the Construction of one or more following public facilities within the City public right-of-
way or easement: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street, Storm Drain, Street Light, and Street Signs.
A CFA may include private facilities within the right-of-way dedicated as private right-of-
way or easement on a recorded plat.
8. Contract—The entire and integrated written document incorporating the Contract
Documents between the Developer, Contractor, and/or City concerning the Work. The
Contract supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or
oral.
9. Contract Documents—Those items that make up the contract and which must include the
Agreement, and it’s attachments such as standard construction specifications, standard City
Conditions, other general conditions of the Developer, including:
a. An Agreement
00 73 10- 2
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 2 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
b. Attachments to the Agreement
i. Bid Form
ii. Vendor Compliance with State Law Non-Resident Bidder
iii. Prequalification Statement
c. Current Prevailing Wage Rates Table (if required by City)
d. Insurance Accord Form
e. Payment Bond
f. Performance Bond
g. Maintenance Bond
h. Power of Attorney for Bonds
i. Workers Compensation Affidavit
j. MWBE Commitment Form( If required by City)
k. General Conditions
l. Supplementary Conditions
m. The Standard City Conditions
n. Specifications specifically made part of the Contract Documents by attachment, if
not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of
the Project’s Contract Documents
o. Drawings
p. Documentation submitted by contractor prior to Notice of Award.
q. The following which may be delivered or issued after the effective date if the
Agreement and, if issued become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents
i. Notice to Proceed
ii. Field Orders
iii. Change Orders
iv. Letters of Final Acceptance
r. Approved Submittals, other Contractor submittals, and the reports and drawings of
subsurface and physical conditions are not Contract Documents.
10. Contractor—The individual or entity with whom Developer has entered into the Agreement.
11. Day or day – A day, unless otherwise defined, shall mean a Calendar Day.
12. Developer – An individual or entity that desires to make certain improvements within the
City of Fort Worth
13. Drawings—That part of the Contract Documents prepared or approved by Engineer which
graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed by
Contractor. Submittals are not Drawings as so defined.
14. Engineer—The licensed professional engineer or engineering firm registered in the State of
Texas performing professional services for the Developer.
15. Final Acceptance – The written notice given by the City to the Developer and/or Contractor
that the Work specified in the Contract Documents has been completed to the satisfaction of
the City.
00 73 10- 3
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 3 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
16. Final Inspection – Inspection carried out by the City to verify that the Contractor has
completed the Work, and each and every part or appurtenance thereof, fully, entirely, and in
conformance with the Contract Documents.
17. General Requirements—A part of the Contract Documents between the Developer and a
Contractor.
18. Laws and Regulations—Any and all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes,
and orders of any and all governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having
jurisdiction.
19. Liens—Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Project funds, real property, or
personal property.
20. Milestone—A principal event specified in the Contract Documents relating to an
intermediate Contract Time prior to Final Acceptance of the Work.
21. Non-Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and reviewed by the
City, which is signed by Contractor, and Developer, and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
22. Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and approved by the City,
which is signed by Contractor, Developer, and City and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
23. Plans – See definition of Drawings.
24. Project Schedule—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, in accordance with
the General Requirements, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising
the Contractor’s plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Time.
25. Project—The Work to be performed under the Contract Documents.
26. Project Representative—The authorized representative of the City who will be assigned to
the Site.
27. Public Meeting – An announced meeting conducted by the Developer to facilitate public
participation and to assist the public in gaining an informed view of the Project.
28. Regular Working Hours – Hours beginning at 7:00 a.m. and ending at 6:00 p.m., Monday
thru Friday (excluding legal holidays).
29. Samples—Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship that are
representative of some portion of the Work and which establish the standards by which such
portion of the Work will be judged.
00 73 10- 4
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 4 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
30. Schedule of Submittals—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, of required
submittals and the time requirements to support scheduled performance of related
construction activities.
31. Site—Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by City or
Developer upon which the Work is to be performed, including rights-of-way, permits, and
easements for access thereto, and such other lands furnished by City or Developer which are
designated for the use of Contractor.
32. Specifications—That part of the Contract Documents consisting of written requirements for
materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship as applied to the Work, and
certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable thereto.
Specifications may be specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or,
if not attached, may be incorporated by reference as indicated in the Table of Contents
(Division 00 00 00) of each Project.
33. Standard City Conditions – That part of the Contract Documents setting forth requirements
of the City.
34. Subcontractor—An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with any
other Subcontractor for the performance of a part of the Work at the Site.
35. Submittals—All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information
which are specifically prepared or assembled by or for Contractor and submitted by
Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work.
36. Superintendent – The representative of the Contractor who is available at all times and able
to receive instructions from the City and/or Developer and to act for the Contractor.
37. Supplementary Conditions—That part of the Contract Documents which amends or
supplements the General Conditions.
38. Supplier—A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having
a direct contract with Contractor or with any Subcontractor to furnish materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work by Contractor or Subcontractor.
39. Underground Facilities—All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires,
manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, or other such facilities or attachments, and any
encasements containing such facilities, including but not limited to, those that convey
electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications,
cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or
other control systems.
40. Weekend Working Hours – Hours beginning at 9:00 a.m. and ending at 5:00 p.m., Saturday,
Sunday or legal holiday, as approved in advance by the City.
00 73 10- 5
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 5 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
41. Work—The entire construction or the various separately identifiable parts thereof required
to be provided under the Contract Documents. Work includes and is the result of performing
or providing all labor, services, and documentation necessary to produce such construction
including any Participating Change Order, Non-Participating Change Order, or Field
Order, and furnishing, installing, and incorporating all materials and equipment into such
construction, all as required by the Contract Documents.
42. Working Day – A working day is defined as a day, not including Saturdays, Sundays, or
legal holidays authorized by the City for contract purposes, in which weather or other
conditions not under the control of the Contractor will permit the performance of the
principal unit of work underway for a continuous period of not less than 7 hours between 7
a.m. and 6 p.m.
1.02 Terminology
A. The words and terms discussed in Paragraph 1.02.B through D are not defined but, when used in
the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning.
B. Defective:
1. The word “defective,” when modifying the word “Work,” refers to Work that is
unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it:
a. does not conform to the Contract Documents; or
b. does not meet the requirements of any applicable inspection, reference standard, test, or
approval referred to in the Contract Documents; or
c. has been damaged prior to City’s written acceptance.
C. Furnish, Install, Perform, Provide:
1. The word “Furnish” or the word “Install” or the word “Perform” or the word “Provide” or
the word “Supply,” or any combination or similar directive or usage thereof, shall mean
furnishing and incorporating in the Work including all necessary labor, materials, equipment,
and everything necessary to perform the Work indicated, unless specifically limited in the
context used.
D. Unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents, words or phrases that have a well-known
technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in
accordance with such recognized meaning.
00 73 10- 6
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 6 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 2 – PRELIMINARY MATTERS
2.01 Before Starting Construction
Baseline Schedules: Submit to City in accordance with the Contract Documents, and prior to starting
the Work. New schedules will be submitted to City when Participating Change Orders or Non-
Participating Change Orders occur.
2.02 Preconstruction Conference
Before any Work at the Site is started, the Contractor shall attend a Preconstruction Conference as
specified in the Contract Documents.
2.03 Public Meeting
Contractor may not mobilize any equipment, materials or resources to the Site prior to Contractor
attending the Public Meeting as scheduled by the City.
ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AMENDING
3.01 Reference Standards
A. Standards, Specifications, Codes, Laws, and Regulations
1. Reference to standards, specifications, manuals, or codes of any technical society,
organization, or association, or to Laws or Regulations, whether such reference be specific or
by implication, shall mean the standard, specification, manual, code, or Laws or Regulations
in effect at the time of opening of Bids (or on the Effective Date of the Agreement if there
were no Bids), except as may be otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents.
2. No provision or instruction shall be effective to assign to City, or any of its officers,
directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors, any duty or
authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work or any duty or authority to
undertake responsibility inconsistent with the provisions of the Contract Documents.
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents
A. The Contract Documents may be amended to provide for additions, deletions, and revisions in
the Work or to modify the terms and conditions thereof by a Participating Change Order or a
Non-Participating Change Order.
B. The requirements of the Contract Documents may be supplemented, and minor variations and
deviations in the Work not involving a change in Contract Price or Contract Time, may be
authorized, by one or more of the following ways:
1. A Field Order;
00 73 10- 7
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 7 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. City’s or Engineer’s review of a Submittal (subject to the provisions of Paragraph 5.16.C); or
2. City’s written interpretation or clarification.
ARTICLE 4 – BONDS AND INSURANCE
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers
All bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents to be purchased and maintained by
Contractor shall be obtained from surety or insurance companies that are duly licensed or authorized
in the State of Texas to issue bonds or insurance policies for the limits and coverage so required.
Such surety and insurance companies shall also meet such additional requirements and qualifications
as may be provided Section 4.04.
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds
A. Contractor shall furnish performance and payment bonds in the name of Developer and City, in
accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2253 or successor statute, each in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security for the faithful performance and payment of all of
Contractor’s obligations under the Contract Documents.
B. Contractor shall furnish maintenance bonds in the name of Developer and City in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security to protect the City against any defects in any portion of the
Work described in the Contract Documents. Maintenance bonds shall remain in effect for two
(2) years after the date of Final Acceptance by the City.
C. All bonds shall be in the form prescribed by the Contract Documents except as provided
otherwise by Laws or Regulations, and shall be executed by such sureties as are named in the list
of “Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and
as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies” as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Financial
Management Service, Surety Bond Branch, U.S. Department of the Treasury. All bonds signed
by an agent or attorney-in-fact must be accompanied by a sealed and dated power of attorney
which shall show that it is effective on the date the agent or attorney-in-fact signed each bond.
D. If the surety on any bond furnished by Contractor is declared bankrupt or becomes insolvent or
its right to do business is terminated in the State of Texas or it ceases to meet the requirements of
Paragraph 4.02.C, Contractor shall promptly notify City and shall, within 30 days after the event
giving rise to such notification, provide another bond and surety, both of which shall comply
with the requirements of Paragraphs 4.01 and 4.02.C.
4.03 Certificates of Insurance
Contractor shall deliver to Developer and City, with copies to each additional insured and loss payee
identified in these Standard City Conditions certificates of insurance (and other evidence of
insurance requested by City or any other additional insured) which Contractor is required to
purchase and maintain.
00 73 10- 8
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 8 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. The certificate of insurance shall document the City, an as “Additional Insured” on all
liability policies.
2. The Contractor’s general liability insurance shall include a, “per project” or “per location”,
endorsement, which shall be identified in the certificate of insurance provided to the City.
3. The certificate shall be signed by an agent authorized to bind coverage on behalf of the
insured, be complete in its entirety, and show complete insurance carrier names as listed in
the current A.M. Best Property & Casualty Guide
4. The insurers for all policies must be licensed and/or approved to do business in the State of
Texas. Except for workers’ compensation, all insurers must have a minimum rating of A-:
VII in the current A. M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial
strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. If the rating is below that
required, written approval of City is required.
5. All applicable policies shall include a Waiver of Subrogation (Rights of Recovery) in favor
of the City. In addition, the Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the
Engineer (if applicable), and each additional insured identified in these Standard City
Conditions. Failure of the City to demand such certificates or other evidence of full
compliance with the insurance requirements or failure of the City to identify a deficiency
from evidence that is provided shall not be construed as a waiver of Contractor’s obligation
to maintain such lines of insurance coverage.
6. If insurance policies are not written for specified coverage limits, an Umbrella or Excess
Liability insurance for any differences is required. Excess Liability shall follow form of the
primary coverage.
7. Unless otherwise stated, all required insurance shall be written on the “occurrence basis”. If
coverage is underwritten on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall be coincident with
or prior to the date of the effective date of the agreement and the certificate of insurance shall
state that the coverage is claims-made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall
be maintained for the duration of the Contract and for three (3) years following Final
Acceptance provided under the Contract Documents or for the warranty period, whichever is
longer. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall evidence such
insurance coverage.
8. Policies shall have no exclusions by endorsements, which, neither nullify or amend, the
required lines of coverage, nor decrease the limits of said coverage unless such endorsements
are approved in writing by the City. In the event a Contract has been bid or executed and the
exclusions are determined to be unacceptable or the City desires additional insurance
coverage, and the City desires the contractor/engineer to obtain such coverage, the contract
price shall be adjusted by the cost of the premium for such additional coverage plus 10%.
9. Any self-insured retention (SIR), in excess of $25,000.00, affecting required insurance
coverage shall be approved by the City in regards to asset value and stockholders' equity. In
00 73 10- 9
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 9 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
lieu of traditional insurance, alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk
retention groups, must also be approved by City.
10. Any deductible in excess of $5,000.00, for any policy that does not provide coverage on a
first-dollar basis, must be acceptable to and approved by the City.
11. City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to review the insurance requirements and to
make reasonable adjustments to insurance coverage’s and their limits when deemed
necessary and prudent by the City based upon changes in statutory law, court decision or the
claims history of the industry as well as of the contracting party to the City. The City shall
be required to provide prior notice of 90 days, and the insurance adjustments shall be
incorporated into the Work by Change Order.
12. City shall be entitled, upon written request and without expense, to receive copies of policies
and endorsements thereto and may make any reasonable requests for deletion or revision or
modifications of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions necessary to
conform the policy and endorsements to the requirements of the Contract. Deletions,
revisions, or modifications shall not be required where policy provisions are established by
law or regulations binding upon either party or the underwriter on any such policies.
13. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for
Contractor’s insurance.
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance
A. Workers Compensation and Employers’ Liability. Contractor shall purchase and maintain such
insurance coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers’
Compensation Act (Texas Labor Code, Ch. 406, as amended), and minimum limits for
Employers’ Liability as is appropriate for the Work being performed and as will provide
protection from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from Contractor’s
performance of the Work and Contractor’s other obligations under the Contract Documents,
whether it is to be performed by Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly
or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts
any of them may be liable:
1. claims under workers’ compensation, disability benefits, and other similar employee benefit
acts;
2. claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of
Contractor’s employees.
3. The limits of liability for the insurance shall provide the following coverages for not less
than the following amounts or greater where required by Laws and Regulations
a. Statutory limits
b. Employer's liability
00 73 10- 10
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 10 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1) $100,000 each accident/occurrence
2) $100,000 Disease - each employee
3) $500,000 Disease - policy limit
B. Commercial General Liability. Coverage shall include but not be limited to covering liability
(bodily injury or property damage) arising from: premises/operations, independent contractors,
products/completed operations, personal injury, and liability under an insured contract. Insurance
shall be provided on an occurrence basis, and as comprehensive as the current Insurance
Services Office (ISO) policy. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to
any other insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the City. The Commercial General
Liability policy, shall have no exclusions by endorsements that would alter of nullify
premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or advertising
injury, which are normally contained with the policy, unless the City approves such exclusions
in writing.
1. For construction projects that present a substantial completed operation exposure, the City
may require the contractor to maintain completed operations coverage for a minimum of no
less than three (3) years following the completion of the project
2. Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section which shall be on a per project basis
covering the Contractor with minimum limits of:
a. $1,000,000 each occurrence
b. $2,000,000 aggregate limit
3. The policy must have an endorsement (Amendment – Aggregate Limits of Insurance)
making the General Aggregate Limits apply separately to each job site.
4. The Commercial General Liability Insurance policies shall provide “X”, “C”, and “U”
coverage’s. Verification of such coverage must be shown in the Remarks Article of the
Certificate of Insurance.
C. Automobile Liability. A commercial business auto policy shall provide coverage on “any auto”,
defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned and provide indemnity for claims for damages
because bodily injury or death of any person and or property damage arising out of the work,
maintenance or use of any motor vehicle by the Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by
anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone
for whose acts any of them may be liable.
1. Automobile Liability, Contractor’s Liability Insurance under this Section, which shall be in
an amount not less than the following amounts:
a. Automobile Liability - a commercial business policy shall provide coverage on "Any
Auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned.
00 73 10- 11
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 11 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1) $1,000,000 each accident on a combined single limit basis. Split limits are
acceptable if limits are at least:
2) $250,000 Bodily Injury per person
3) $500,000 Bodily Injury per accident /
4) $100,000 Property Damage
D. Railroad Protective Liability. If any of the work or any warranty work is within the limits of
railroad right-of-way, the Contractor shall comply with the following requirements:
1. The Contractor’s construction activities will require its employees, agents, subcontractors,
equipment, and material deliveries to cross railroad properties and tracks owned and
operated by: ____________________________________________________________
Write the name of the railroad company. (If none, then write none)
2. The Contractor shall conduct its operations on railroad properties in such a manner as not to
interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the railroad company in any manner whatsoever in the use
or operation of its/their trains or other property. Such operations on railroad properties may
require that Contractor to execute a “Right of Entry Agreement” with the particular railroad
company or companies involved, and to this end the Contractor should satisfy itself as to the
requirements of each railroad company and be prepared to execute the right-of-entry (if any)
required by a railroad company. The requirements specified herein likewise relate to the
Contractor’s use of private and/or construction access roads crossing said railroad company’s
properties.
3. The Contractual Liability coverage required by Paragraph 5.04D of the General Conditions
shall provide coverage for not less than the following amounts, issued by companies
satisfactory to the City and to the Railroad Company for a term that continues for so long as
the Contractor’s operations and work cross, occupy, or touch railroad property:
a. General Aggregate: _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
b. Each Occurrence: : _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
4. With respect to the above outlined insurance requirements, the following shall govern:
a. Where a single railroad company is involved, the Contractor shall provide one insurance
policy in the name of the railroad company. However, if more than one grade separation
or at-grade crossing is affected by the Project at entirely separate locations on the line or
lines of the same railroad company, separate coverage may be required, each in the
amount stated above.
b. Where more than one railroad company is operating on the same right-of-way or where
several railroad companies are involved and operated on their own separate rights-of-
None.
None.
None.
00 73 10- 12
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 12 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
way, the Contractor may be required to provide separate insurance policies in the name
of each railroad company.
c. If, in addition to a grade separation or an at-grade crossing, other work or activity is
proposed on a railroad company’s right-of-way at a location entirely separate from the
grade separation or at-grade crossing, insurance coverage for this work must be included
in the policy covering the grade separation.
d. If no grade separation is involved but other work is proposed on a railroad company’s
right-of-way, all such other work may be covered in a single policy for that railroad, even
though the work may be at two or more separate locations.
5. No work or activities on a railroad company’s property to be performed by the Contractor
shall be commenced until the Contractor has furnished the City with an original policy or
policies of the insurance for each railroad company named, as required above. All such
insurance must be approved by the City and each affected Railroad Company prior to the
Contractor’s beginning work.
6. The insurance specified above must be carried until all Work to be performed on the railroad
right-of-way has been completed and the grade crossing, if any, is no longer used by the
Contractor. In addition, insurance must be carried during all maintenance and/or repair work
performed in the railroad right-of-way. Such insurance must name the railroad company as
the insured, together with any tenant or lessee of the railroad company operating over tracks
involved in the Project.
E. Notification of Policy Cancellation: Contractor shall immediately notify City upon cancellation
or other loss of insurance coverage. Contractor shall stop work until replacement insurance has
been procured. There shall be no time credit for days not worked pursuant to this section.
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace
If City has any objection to the coverage afforded by or other provisions of the bonds or insurance
required to be purchased and maintained by the Contractor in accordance with Article 5 on the basis
of non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the Developer and City shall so notify the
Contractor in writing within 10 Business Days after receipt of the certificates (or other evidence
requested). Contractor shall provide to the City such additional information in respect of insurance
provided as the Developer or City may reasonably request. If Contractor does not purchase or
maintain all of the bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Developer or City
shall notify the Contractor in writing of such failure prior to the start of the Work, or of such failure
to maintain prior to any change in the required coverage.
ARTICLE 5 – CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent
A. Contractor shall supervise, inspect, and direct the Work competently and efficiently, devoting
such attention thereto and applying such skills and expertise as may be necessary to perform the
00 73 10- 13
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 13 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the
means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction.
B. At all times during the progress of the Work, Contractor shall assign a competent, English-
speaking, Superintendent who shall not be replaced without written notice to City. The
Superintendent will be Contractor’s representative at the Site and shall have authority to act on
behalf of Contractor. All communication given to or received from the Superintendent shall be
binding on Contractor.
C. Contractor shall notify the City 24 hours prior to moving areas during the sequence of
construction.
5.02 Labor; Working Hours
A. Contractor shall provide competent, suitably qualified personnel to perform construction as
required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall at all times maintain good discipline and
order at the Site.
B. Except as otherwise required for the safety or protection of persons or the Work or property at
the Site or adjacent thereto, and except as otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, all Work
at the Site shall be performed during Regular Working Hours. Contractor will not permit the
performance of Work beyond Regular Working Hours or for Weekend Working Hours without
City’s written consent (which will not be unreasonably withheld). Written request (by letter or
electronic communication) to perform Work:
1. for beyond Regular Working Hours request must be made by noon at least two (2) Business
Days prior
2. for Weekend Working Hours request must be made by noon of the preceding Thursday
3. for legal holidays request must be made by noon two Business Days prior to the legal
holiday.
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment
A. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall provide and assume full
responsibility for all services, materials, equipment, labor, transportation, construction
equipment and machinery, tools, appliances, fuel, power, light, heat, telephone, water, sanitary
facilities, temporary facilities, and all other facilities and incidentals necessary for the
performance, Contractor required testing, start-up, and completion of the Work.
B. All materials and equipment incorporated into the Work shall be as specified or, if not specified,
shall be of good quality and new, except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. All
special warranties and guarantees required by the Specifications shall expressly run to the benefit
of City. If required by City, Contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence (including reports of
required tests) as to the source, kind, and quality of materials and equipment.
00 73 10- 14
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 14 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. All materials and equipment to be incorporated into the Work shall be stored, applied, installed,
connected, erected, protected, used, cleaned, and conditioned in accordance with instructions of
the applicable Supplier, except as otherwise may be provided in the Contract Documents.
5.04 Project Schedule
A. Contractor shall adhere to the Project Schedule established in accordance with Paragraph 2.01
and the General Requirements as it may be adjusted from time to time as provided below.
1. Contractor shall submit to City for acceptance (to the extent indicated in Paragraph 2.01 and
the General Requirements) proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule.
2. Proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule that will change the Contract Time shall be
submitted in accordance with the requirements of Article 9. Adjustments in Contract Time
for projects with City participation shall be made by participating change orders.
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals”
A. Whenever an item of material or equipment is specified or described in the Contract Documents
by using the name of a proprietary item or the name of a particular Supplier, the specification or
description is intended to establish the type, function, appearance, and quality required. Unless
the specification or description contains or is followed by words reading that no like, equivalent,
or “or-equal” item or no substitution is permitted, other items of material or equipment of other
Suppliers may be submitted to City for review under the circumstances described below.
1. “Or-Equal” Items: If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by
Contractor is functionally equal to that named and sufficiently similar so that no change in
related Work will be required, it may be considered by City as an “or-equal” item, in which
case review and approval of the proposed item may, in City’s sole discretion, be
accomplished without compliance with some or all of the requirements for approval of
proposed substitute items. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5.05.A.1, a proposed item of
material or equipment will be considered functionally equal to an item so named if:
a. City determines that:
1) it is at least equal in materials of construction, quality, durability, appearance,
strength, and design characteristics;
2) it will reliably perform at least equally well the function and achieve the results
imposed by the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole; and
3) it has a proven record of performance and availability of responsive service; and
b. Contractor certifies that, if approved and incorporated into the Work:
1) there will be no increase in cost to the City or increase in Contract Time; and
00 73 10- 15
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 15 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2) it will conform substantially to the detailed requirements of the item named in the
Contract Documents.
2. Substitute Items:
a. If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor does
not qualify as an “or-equal” item under Paragraph 5.05.A.1, it may be submitted as a
proposed substitute item.
b. Contractor shall submit sufficient information as provided below to allow City to
determine if the item of material or equipment proposed is essentially equivalent to that
named and an acceptable substitute therefor. Requests for review of proposed substitute
items of material or equipment will not be accepted by City from anyone other than
Contractor.
c. Contractor shall make written application to City for review of a proposed substitute item
of material or equipment that Contractor seeks to furnish or use. The application shall
comply with Section 01 25 00 and:
1) shall certify that the proposed substitute item will:
i. perform adequately the functions and achieve the results called for by the general
design;
ii. be similar in substance to that specified;
iii. be suited to the same use as that specified; and
2) will state:
i. the extent, if any, to which the use of the proposed substitute item will prejudice
Contractor’s achievement of final completion on time;
ii. whether use of the proposed substitute item in the Work will require a change in
any of the Contract Documents (or in the provisions of any other direct contract
with City for other work on the Project) to adapt the design to the proposed
substitute item;
iii. whether incorporation or use of the proposed substitute item in connection with
the Work is subject to payment of any license fee or royalty; and
3) will identify:
i. all variations of the proposed substitute item from that specified;
ii. available engineering, sales, maintenance, repair, and replacement services; and
00 73 10- 16
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 16 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
4) shall contain an itemized estimate of all costs or credits that will result directly or
indirectly from use of such substitute item, including costs of redesign and Damage
Claims of other contractors affected by any resulting change.
B. Substitute Construction Methods or Procedures: If a specific means, method, technique,
sequence, or procedure of construction is expressly required by the Contract Documents,
Contractor may furnish or utilize a substitute means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure
of construction approved by City. Contractor shall submit sufficient information to allow City, in
City’s sole discretion, to determine that the substitute proposed is equivalent to that expressly
called for by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall make written application to City for
review in the same manner as those provided in Paragraph 5.05.A.2.
C. City’s Evaluation: City will be allowed a reasonable time within which to evaluate each
proposal or submittal made pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A and 5.05.B. City may require
Contractor to furnish additional data about the proposed substitute. City will be the sole judge of
acceptability. No “or-equal” or substitute will be ordered, installed or utilized until City’s review
is complete, which will be evidenced by a Change Order in the case of a substitute and an
accepted Submittal for an “or-equal.” City will advise Contractor in writing of its determination.
D. Special Guarantee: City may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor’s expense a special
performance guarantee, warranty, or other surety with respect to any substitute. Contractor shall
indemnify and hold harmless City and anyone directly or indirectly employed by them from and
against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out
of the use of substituted materials or equipment.
E. City’s Cost Reimbursement: City will record City’s costs in evaluating a substitute proposed or
submitted by Contractor pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A.2 and 5.05.B. Whether or not City
approves a substitute so proposed or submitted by Contractor, Contractor may be required to
reimburse City for evaluating each such proposed substitute. Contractor may also be required to
reimburse City for the charges for making changes in the Contract Documents.
F. Contractor’s Expense: Contractor shall provide all data in support of any proposed substitute or
“or-equal” at Contractor’s expense.
G. Substitute Reimbursement: Costs (savings or charges) attributable to acceptance of a substitute
shall be incorporated to the Contract by Participating Change Order.
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors)
A. The Contractor and any subcontractors are required to be prequalified for the work types
requiring pre-qualification
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others
A. Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance:
00 73 10- 17
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 17 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Required for this Contract.
(Check this box if there is any City Participation)
Not Required for this Contract.
It is City policy to ensure the full and equitable participation by Minority and Women Business
Enterprises (MWBE) in the procurement of goods and services on a contractual basis. If the
Contract Documents provide for a MWBE goal, Contractor is required to comply with the intent
of the City’s MWBE Ordinance (as amended) by the following:
1. Contractor shall, upon request by City, provide complete and accurate information regarding
actual work performed by a MWBE on the Contract and payment therefor.
2. Contractor will not make additions, deletions, or substitutions of accepted MWBE without
written consent of the City. Any unjustified change or deletion shall be a material breach of
Contract and may result in debarment in accordance with the procedures outlined in the
Ordinance.
3. Contractor shall, upon request by City, allow an audit and/or examination of any books,
records, or files in the possession of the Contractor that will substantiate the actual work
performed by an MWBE. Material misrepresentation of any nature will be grounds for
termination of the Contract. Any such misrepresentation may be grounds for disqualification
of Contractor to bid on future contracts with the City for a period of not less than three years.
B. Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the Subcontractors,
Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work just as
Contractor is responsible for Contractor’s own acts and omissions. Nothing in the Contract
Documents:
1. shall create for the benefit of any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity
any contractual relationship between City and any such Subcontractor, Supplier or other
individual or entity; nor
2. shall create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any moneys
due any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity except as may otherwise
be required by Laws and Regulations.
C. Contractor shall be solely responsible for scheduling and coordinating the Work of
Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the
Work under a direct or indirect contract with Contractor.
D. All Subcontractors, Suppliers, and such other individuals or entities performing or furnishing
any of the Work shall communicate with City through Contractor.
E. All Work performed for Contractor by a Subcontractor or Supplier will be pursuant to an
appropriate agreement between Contractor and the Subcontractor or Supplier which specifically
binds the Subcontractor or Supplier to the applicable terms and conditions of these Contract
00 73 10- 18
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 18 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents, Contractor shall provide City contract numbers and reference numbers to the
Subcontractors and/or Suppliers.
5.08 Wage Rates
Required for this Contract.
Not Required for this Contract.
A. Duty to pay Prevailing Wage Rates. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of
Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code (as amended), including the payment of not less than the
rates determined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth to be the prevailing wage rates in
accordance with Chapter 2258. Such prevailing wage rates are included in these Contract
Documents.
B. Penalty for Violation. A Contractor or any Subcontractor who does not pay the prevailing wage
shall, upon demand made by the City, pay to the City $60 for each worker employed for each
calendar day or part of the day that the worker is paid less than the prevailing wage rates
stipulated in these contract documents. This penalty shall be retained by the City to offset its
administrative costs, pursuant to Texas Government Code 2258.023.
C. Complaints of Violations and City Determination of Good Cause. On receipt of information,
including a complaint by a worker, concerning an alleged violation of 2258.023, Texas
Government Code, by a Contractor or Subcontractor, the City shall make an initial
determination, before the 31st day after the date the City receives the information, as to whether
good cause exists to believe that the violation occurred. The City shall notify in writing the
Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker of its initial determination. Upon the
City’s determination that there is good cause to believe the Contractor or Subcontractor has
violated Chapter 2258, the City shall retain the full amounts claimed by the claimant or
claimants as the difference between wages paid and wages due under the prevailing wage rates,
such amounts being subtracted from successive progress payments pending a final determination
of the violation.
D. Arbitration Required if Violation Not Resolved. An issue relating to an alleged violation of
Section 2258.023, Texas Government Code, including a penalty owed to the City or an affected
worker, shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the Texas General
Arbitration Act (Article 224 et seq., Revised Statutes) if the Contractor or Subcontractor and any
affected worker does not resolve the issue by agreement before the 15th day after the date the
City makes its initial determination pursuant to Paragraph C above. If the persons required to
arbitrate under this section do not agree on an arbitrator before the 11th day after the date that
arbitration is required, a district court shall appoint an arbitrator on the petition of any of the
persons. The City is not a party in the arbitration. The decision and award of the arbitrator is
final and binding on all parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction.
E. Records to be Maintained. The Contractor and each Subcontractor shall, for a period of three (3)
years following the date of acceptance of the work, maintain records that show (i) the name and
00 73 10- 19
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 19 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
occupation of each worker employed by the Contractor in the construction of the Work provided
for in this Contract; and (ii) the actual per diem wages paid to each worker. The records shall be
open at all reasonable hours for inspection by the City. The provisions of Paragraph 6.23, Right
to Audit, shall pertain to this inspection.
F. Progress Payments. With each progress payment or payroll period, whichever is less, the
Contractor shall submit an affidavit stating that the Contractor has complied with the
requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code.
G. Posting of Wage Rates. The Contractor shall post prevailing wage rates in a conspicuous place at
all times.
H. Subcontractor Compliance. The Contractor shall include in its subcontracts and/or shall
otherwise require all of its Subcontractors to comply with Paragraphs A through G above.
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties
A. To the fullest extent permitted by Laws and Regulations, Contractor shall indemnify and hold
harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited
to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court
or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to any infringement of
patent rights or copyrights incident to the use in the performance of the Work or resulting from
the incorporation in the Work of any invention, design, process, product, or device not specified
in the Contract Documents.
5.10 Laws and Regulations
A. Contractor shall give all notices required by and shall comply with all Laws and Regulations
applicable to the performance of the Work. Except where otherwise expressly required by
applicable Laws and Regulations, the City shall not be responsible for monitoring Contractor’s
compliance with any Laws or Regulations.
B. If Contractor performs any Work knowing or having reason to know that it is contrary to Laws
or Regulations, Contractor shall bear all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such Work.
However, it shall not be Contractor’s responsibility to make certain that the Specifications and
Drawings are in accordance with Laws and Regulations, but this shall not relieve Contractor of
Contractor’s obligations under Paragraph 3.01.
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas
A. Limitation on Use of Site and Other Areas:
1. Contractor shall confine construction equipment, the storage of materials and equipment, and
the operations of workers to the Site and other areas permitted by Laws and Regulations, and
shall not unreasonably encumber the Site and other areas with construction equipment or
00 73 10- 20
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 20 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
other materials or equipment. Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any damage to
any such land or area, or to the owner or occupant thereof, or of any adjacent land or areas
resulting from the performance of the Work.
2. At any time when, in the judgment of the City, the Contractor has obstructed or closed or is
carrying on operations in a portion of a street, right-of-way, or easement greater than is
necessary for proper execution of the Work, the City may require the Contractor to finish the
section on which operations are in progress before work is commenced on any additional
area of the Site.
3. Should any Damage Claim be made by any such owner or occupant because of the
performance of the Work, Contractor shall promptly attempt to resolve the Damage Claim.
4. Pursuant to Paragraph 5.18, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and
against all claims, costs, losses, and damages arising out of or relating to any claim or
action, legal or equitable, brought by any such owner or occupant against City.
B. Removal of Debris During Performance of the Work: During the progress of the Work
Contractor shall keep the Site and other areas free from accumulations of waste materials,
rubbish, and other debris. Removal and disposal of such waste materials, rubbish, and other
debris shall conform to applicable Laws and Regulations.
C. Site Maintenance Cleaning: 24 hours after written notice is given to the Contractor that the
clean-up on the job site is proceeding in a manner unsatisfactory to the City or Developer, if the
Contractor fails to correct the unsatisfactory procedure, the City may take such direct action as
the City deems appropriate to correct the clean-up deficiencies cited to the Contractor in the
written notice (by letter or electronic communication), and shall be entitled to recover its cost in
doing so. The City may withhold Final Acceptance until clean-up is complete and cost are
recovered.
D. Final Site Cleaning: Prior to Final Acceptance of the Work Contractor shall clean the Site and
the Work and make it ready for utilization by City or adjacent property owner. At the completion
of the Work Contractor shall remove from the Site all tools, appliances, construction equipment
and machinery, and surplus materials and shall restore to original condition or better all property
disturbed by the Work.
E. Loading Structures: Contractor shall not load nor permit any part of any structure to be loaded
in any manner that will endanger the structure, nor shall Contractor subject any part of the Work
or adjacent property to stresses or pressures that will endanger it.
5.12 Record Documents
A. Contractor shall maintain in a safe place at the Site or in a place designated by the Contractor
and approved by the City, one (1) record copy of all Drawings, Specifications, Addenda, Change
Orders, Field Orders, and written interpretations and clarifications in good order and annotated
to show changes made during construction. These record documents together with all approved
00 73 10- 21
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 21 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Samples and a counterpart of all accepted Submittals will be available to City for reference.
Upon completion of the Work, these record documents, any operation and maintenance manuals,
and Submittals will be delivered to City prior to Final Inspection. Contractor shall include
accurate locations for buried and imbedded items.
5.13 Safety and Protection
A. Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety
precautions and programs in connection with the Work. Such responsibility does not relieve
Subcontractors of their responsibility for the safety of persons or property in the performance of
their work, nor for compliance with applicable safety Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall
take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to
prevent damage, injury or loss to:
1. all persons on the Site or who may be affected by the Work;
2. all the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on
or off the Site; and
3. other property at the Site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, walks,
pavements, roadways, structures, utilities, and Underground Facilities not designated for
removal, relocation, or replacement in the course of construction.
B. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Laws and Regulations relating to the safety of
persons or property, or to the protection of persons or property from damage, injury, or loss; and
shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. Contractor shall
notify owners of adjacent property and of Underground Facilities and other utility owners when
prosecution of the Work may affect them, and shall cooperate with them in the protection,
removal, relocation, and replacement of their property.
C. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of City’s safety programs, if any.
D. Contractor shall inform City of the specific requirements of Contractor’s safety program, if any,
with which City’s employees and representatives must comply while at the Site.
E. All damage, injury, or loss to any property referred to in Paragraph 5.13.A.2 or 5.13.A.3 caused,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by Contractor, any Subcontractor, Supplier, or any
other individual or entity directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the
Work, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, shall be remedied by Contractor.
F. Contractor’s duties and responsibilities for safety and for protection of the Work shall continue
until such time as all the Work is completed and City has accepted the Work.
5.14 Safety Representative
Contractor shall inform City in writing of Contractor’s designated safety representative at the Site.
00 73 10- 22
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 22 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs
Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating any exchange of material safety data sheets or other
hazard communication information required to be made available to or exchanged between or
among employers in accordance with Laws or Regulations.
5.16 Submittals
A. Contractor shall submit required Submittals to City for review and acceptance. Each submittal
will be identified as required by City.
1. Submit number of copies specified in the General Requirements.
2. Data shown on the Submittals will be complete with respect to quantities, dimensions,
specified performance and design criteria, materials, and similar data to show City the
services, materials, and equipment Contractor proposes to provide and to enable City to
review the information for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
3. Submittals submitted as herein provided by Contractor and reviewed by City for
conformance with the design concept shall be executed in conformity with the Contract
Documents unless otherwise required by City.
4. When Submittals are submitted for the purpose of showing the installation in greater detail,
their review shall not excuse Contractor from requirements shown on the Drawings and
Specifications.
5. For-Information-Only submittals upon which the City is not expected to conduct review or
take responsive action may be so identified in the Contract Documents.
6. Submit required number of Samples specified in the Specifications.
7. Clearly identify each Sample as to material, Supplier, pertinent data such as catalog numbers,
the use for which intended and other data as City may require to enable City to review the
submittal for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
B. Where a Submittal is required by the Contract Documents or the Schedule of Submittals, any
related Work performed prior to City’s review and acceptance of the pertinent submittal will be
at the sole expense and responsibility of Contractor.
C. City’s Review:
1. City will provide timely review of required Submittals in accordance with the Schedule of
Submittals acceptable to City. City’s review and acceptance will be only to determine if the
items covered by the submittals will, after installation or incorporation in the Work, conform
to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design
concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract
Documents.
00 73 10- 23
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 23 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2. City’s review and acceptance will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or
procedures of construction (except where a particular means, method, technique, sequence,
or procedure of construction is specifically and expressly called for by the Contract
Documents) or to safety precautions or programs incident thereto. The review and
acceptance of a separate item as such will not indicate approval of the assembly in which the
item functions.
3. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for any
variation from the requirements of the Contract Documents unless Contractor has complied
with the requirements of Section 01 33 00 and City has given written acceptance of each
such variation by specific written notation thereof incorporated in or accompanying the
Submittal. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for
complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee
A. Contractor warrants and guarantees to City that all Work will be in accordance with the Contract
Documents and will not be defective. City and its officers, directors, members, partners,
employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors shall be entitled to rely on representation of
Contractor’s warranty and guarantee.
B. Contractor’s warranty and guarantee hereunder excludes defects or damage caused by:
1. abuse, modification, or improper maintenance or operation by persons other than Contractor,
Subcontractors, Suppliers, or any other individual or entity for whom Contractor is
responsible; or
2. normal wear and tear under normal usage.
C. Contractor’s obligation to perform and complete the Work in accordance with the Contract
Documents shall be absolute. None of the following will constitute an acceptance of Work that is
not in accordance with the Contract Documents or a release of Contractor’s obligation to
perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents:
1. observations by City;
2. recommendation or payment by City or Developer of any progress or final payment;
3. the issuance of a certificate of Final Acceptance by City or any payment related thereto by
City;
4. use or occupancy of the Work or any part thereof by City;
5. any review and acceptance of a Submittal by City;
6. any inspection, test, or approval by others; or
00 73 10- 24
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 24 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7. any correction of defective Work by City.
D. The Contractor shall remedy any defects or damages in the Work and pay for any damage to
other work or property resulting therefrom which shall appear within a period of two (2) years
from the date of Final Acceptance of the Work unless a longer period is specified and shall
furnish a good and sufficient maintenance bond, complying with the requirements of Article
4.02.B. The City will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness.
5.18 Indemnification
A. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the
City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or
alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers,
agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this Contract. THIS
INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE
AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME
OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY
ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. This indemnity provision is
intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by
the City in defending against such claims and causes of actions.
B. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the City, its
officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of
property of the City, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be
performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees
under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY
INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR
PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE
CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF
THE CITY.
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services
A. Contractor will not be required to provide professional design services unless such services are
specifically required by the Contract Documents for a portion of the Work or unless such
services are required to carry out Contractor’s responsibilities for construction means, methods,
techniques, sequences and procedures.
B. If professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems,
materials or equipment are specifically required of Contractor by the Contract Documents, City
will specify all performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. Contractor shall
cause such services or certifications to be provided by a properly licensed professional, whose
signature and seal shall appear on all drawings, calculations, specifications, certifications, and
Submittals prepared by such professional. Submittals related to the Work designed or certified
by such professional, if prepared by others, shall bear such professional’s written approval when
submitted to City.
00 73 10- 25
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 25 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. City shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy, accuracy and completeness of the services,
certifications or approvals performed by such design professionals, provided City has specified
to Contractor performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy.
D. Pursuant to this Paragraph 5.19, City’s review and acceptance of design calculations and design
drawings will be only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with performance
and design criteria given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. City’s
review and acceptance of Submittals (except design calculations and design drawings) will be
only for the purpose stated in Paragraph 5.16.C.
5.20 Right to Audit:
A. The City reserves the right to audit all projects utilizing City funds
B. The Contractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions relating
to this Contract. Contractor agrees that the City shall have access during Regular Working Hours
to all necessary Contractor facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space
in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall
give Contractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
C. Contractor further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that
the subcontractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of such Subcontractor, involving transactions to
the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all
Subcontractor facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to
conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give
Subcontractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
D. Contractor and Subcontractor agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the
City. The City agrees to reimburse Contractor for the cost of the copies as follows at the rate
published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed.
5.21 Nondiscrimination
A. The City is responsible for operating Public Transportation Programs and implementing transit-
related projects, which are funded in part with Federal financial assistance awarded by the U.S.
Department of Transportation and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), without
discriminating against any person in the United States on the basis of race, color, or national
origin.
B. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended: Contractor shall comply with the requirements of
the Act and the Regulations as further defined in the Supplementary Conditions for any project
receiving Federal assistance.
00 73 10- 26
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 26 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 6 – OTHER WORK AT THE SITE
6.01 Related Work at Site
A. City may perform other work related to the Project at the Site with City’s employees, or other
City contractors, or through other direct contracts therefor, or have other work performed by
utility owners. If such other work is not noted in the Contract Documents, then written notice
thereof will be given to Contractor prior to starting any such other work; and
B. Contractor shall afford each other contractor who is a party to such a direct contract, each utility
owner, and City, if City is performing other work with City’s employees or other City
contractors, proper and safe access to the Site, provide a reasonable opportunity for the
introduction and storage of materials and equipment and the execution of such other work, and
properly coordinate the Work with theirs. Contractor shall do all cutting, fitting, and patching of
the Work that may be required to properly connect or otherwise make its several parts come
together and properly integrate with such other work. Contractor shall not endanger any work of
others by cutting, excavating, or otherwise altering such work; provided, however, that
Contractor may cut or alter others' work with the written consent of City and the others whose
work will be affected.
C. If the proper execution or results of any part of Contractor’s Work depends upon work
performed by others under this Article 7, Contractor shall inspect such other work and promptly
report to City in writing any delays, defects, or deficiencies in such other work that render it
unavailable or unsuitable for the proper execution and results of Contractor’s Work. Contractor’s
failure to so report will constitute an acceptance of such other work as fit and proper for
integration with Contractor’s Work except for latent defects in the work provided by others.
ARTICLE 7 – CITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals
City’s responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals is set forth in Paragraph
11.03.
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities
A. The City shall not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, nor be responsible for,
Contractor’s means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety
precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure of Contractor to comply with Laws
and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. City will not be responsible for
Contractor’s failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
B. City will notify the Contractor of applicable safety plans pursuant to Paragraph 5.13.
00 73 10- 27
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 27 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program
While at the Site, City’s employees and representatives shall comply with the specific applicable
requirements of Contractor’s safety programs of which City has been informed pursuant to
Paragraph 5.13.
ARTICLE 8 – CITY’S OBSERVATION STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION
8.01 City’s Project Representative
City will provide one or more Project Representative(s) during the construction period. The duties
and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of City’s representative during construction are
set forth in the Contract Documents.
A. City’s Project Representative will make visits to the Site at intervals appropriate to the various
stages of construction as City deems necessary in order to observe the progress that has been
made and the quality of the various aspects of Contractor’s executed Work. Based on
information obtained during such visits and observations, City’s Project Representative will
determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents.
City’s Project Representative will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections
on the Site to check the quality or quantity of the Work. City’s Project Representative’s efforts
will be directed toward providing City a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work
will conform generally to the Contract Documents.
B. City’s Project Representative’s visits and observations are subject to all the limitations on
authority and responsibility in the Contract Documents.
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work
City’s Project Representative may authorize minor variations in the Work from the requirements of
the Contract Documents which do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract
Time and are compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a Field Order and will be
binding on City Developer, and also on Contractor, who shall perform the Work involved promptly.
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work
City will have authority to reject Work which City’s Project Representative believes to be defective,
or will not produce a completed Project that conforms to the Contract Documents or that will
prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. City will have authority to conduct special inspection or
testing of the Work as provided in Article 11, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or
completed.
00 73 10- 28
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 28 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed
Contractor will determine the actual quantities and classifications of Work performed. City’s Project
Representative will review with Contractor the preliminary determinations on such matters before
rendering a written recommendation. City’s written decision will be final (except as modified to
reflect changed factual conditions or more accurate data).
ARTICLE 9 – CHANGES IN THE WORK
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work
A. Without invalidating the Contract and without notice to any surety, City may, at any time or
from time to time, order Extra Work. Upon notice of such Extra Work, Contractor shall
promptly proceed with the Work involved which will be performed under the applicable
conditions of the Contract Documents (except as otherwise specifically provided). Extra Work
shall be memorialized by a Participating Change Order which may or may not precede an order
of Extra work.
B. For minor changes of Work not requiring changes to Contract Time or Contract Price on a
project with City participation, a Field Order may be issued by the City.
9.02 Notification to Surety
If the provisions of any bond require notice to be given to a surety of any change affecting the
general scope of the Work or the provisions of the Contract Documents (including, but not limited
to, Contract Price or Contract Time), the giving of any such notice will be Contractor’s
responsibility. The amount of each applicable bond will be adjusted by the Contractor to reflect the
effect of any such change.
ARTICLE 10 – CHANGE OF CONTRACT PRICE; CHANGE OF CONTRACT TIME
10.01 Change of Contract Price
A. The Contract Price may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.02 Change of Contract Time
A. The Contract Time may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.03 Delays
A. If Contractor is delayed, City shall not be liable to Contractor for any claims, costs, losses, or
damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and
other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) sustained by
Contractor on or in connection with any other project or anticipated project.
00 73 10- 29
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 29 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 11 – TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL OR ACCEPTANCE OF
DEFECTIVE WORK
11.01 Notice of Defects
Notice of all defective Work of which City has actual knowledge will be given to Contractor.
Defective Work may be rejected, corrected, or accepted as provided in this Article 13.
11.02 Access to Work
City, independent testing laboratories, and governmental agencies with jurisdictional interests will
have access to the Site and the Work at reasonable times for their observation, inspection, and
testing. Contractor shall provide them proper and safe conditions for such access and advise them of
Contractor’s safety procedures and programs so that they may comply therewith as applicable.
11.03 Tests and Inspections
A. Contractor shall give City timely notice of readiness of the Work for all required inspections,
tests, or approvals and shall cooperate with inspection and testing personnel to facilitate required
inspections or tests.
B. If Contract Documents, Laws or Regulations of any public body having jurisdiction require any
of the Work (or part thereof) to be inspected, tested, or approved, Contractor shall assume full
responsibility for arranging and obtaining such independent inspections, tests, retests or
approvals, pay all costs in connection therewith, and furnish City the required certificates of
inspection or approval; excepting, however, those fees specifically identified in the
Supplementary Conditions or any Texas Department of Licensure and Regulation (TDLR)
inspections, which shall be paid as described in the Supplementary Conditions.
C. Contractor shall be responsible for arranging and obtaining and shall pay all costs in connection
with any inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals required for City’s acceptance of materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work; or acceptance of materials, mix designs, or equipment
submitted for approval prior to Contractor’s purchase thereof for incorporation in the Work.
Such inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals shall be performed by organizations approved by
City.
D. City may arrange for the services of an independent testing laboratory (“Testing Lab”) to
perform any inspections or tests (“Testing”) for any part of the Work, as determined solely by
City.
1. City will coordinate such Testing to the extent possible, with Contractor;
2. Should any Testing under this Section 11.03 D result in a “fail”, “did not pass” or other
similar negative result, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying for any and all retests.
Contractor’s cancellation without cause of City initiated Testing shall be deemed a negative
result and require a retest.
00 73 10- 30
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 30 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
3. Any amounts owed for any retest under this Section 11.03 D shall be paid directly to the
Testing Lab by Contractor. City will forward all invoices for retests to
Developer/Contractor.
4. If Contractor fails to pay the Testing Lab, City will not issue a letter of Final Acceptance
until the Testing Lab is Paid
E. If any Work (or the work of others) that is to be inspected, tested, or approved is covered by
Contractor without written concurrence of City, Contractor shall, if requested by City, uncover
such Work for observation.
11.04 Uncovering Work
A. If any Work is covered contrary to the Contract Documents or specific instructions by the City, it
must, if requested by City, be uncovered for City’s observation and replaced at Contractor’s
expense.
11.05 City May Stop the Work
If the Work is defective, or Contractor fails to supply sufficient skilled workers or suitable materials
or equipment, or fails to perform the Work in such a way that the completed Work will conform to
the Contract Documents, City may order Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until
the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, this right of City to stop the Work shall not
give rise to any duty on the part of City to exercise this right for the benefit of Contractor, any
Subcontractor, any Supplier, any other individual or entity, or any surety for, or employee or agent
of any of them.
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work
A. Promptly after receipt of written notice, Contractor shall correct all defective Work pursuant to
an acceptable schedule, whether or not fabricated, installed, or completed, or, if the Work has
been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective.
Contractor shall pay all claims, costs, additional testing, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction
or removal (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others).
Failure to require the removal of any defective Work shall not constitute acceptance of such
Work.
B. When correcting defective Work under the terms of this Paragraph 11.06 or Paragraph 11.07,
Contractor shall take no action that would void or otherwise impair City’s special warranty and
guarantee, if any, on said Work.
11.07 Correction Period
A. If within two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance (or such longer period of time as may
be prescribed by the terms of any applicable special guarantee required by the Contract
00 73 10- 31
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 31 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents), any Work is found to be defective, or if the repair of any damages to the land or
areas made available for Contractor’s use by City or permitted by Laws and Regulations as
contemplated in Paragraph 5.10.A is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without
cost to City and in accordance with City’s written instructions:
1. repair such defective land or areas; or
2. correct such defective Work; or
3. if the defective Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it
with Work that is not defective, and
4. satisfactorily correct or repair or remove and replace any damage to other Work, to the work
of others or other land or areas resulting therefrom.
B. If Contractor does not promptly comply with the terms of City’s written instructions, or in an
emergency where delay would cause serious risk of loss or damage, City may have the defective
Work corrected or repaired or may have the rejected Work removed and replaced. All claims,
costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers,
architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs)
arising out of or relating to such correction or repair or such removal and replacement (including
but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others) will be paid by Contractor.
C. Where defective Work (and damage to other Work resulting therefrom) has been corrected or
removed and replaced under this Paragraph 11.07, the correction period hereunder with respect
to such Work may be required to be extended for an additional period of one year after the end
of the initial correction period. City shall provide 30 days written notice to Contractor and
Developer should such additional warranty coverage be required. Contractor’s obligations under
this Paragraph 11.07 are in addition to any other obligation or warranty. The provisions of this
Paragraph 11.07 shall not be construed as a substitute for, or a waiver of, the provisions of any
applicable statute of limitation or repose.
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work
A. If Contractor fails within a reasonable time after written notice from City to correct defective
Work, or to remove and replace rejected Work as required by City in accordance with Paragraph
11.06.A, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents,
or if Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of the Contract Documents, City may,
after seven (7) days written notice to Contractor and the Developer, correct, or remedy any such
deficiency.
B. In exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09, City shall proceed
expeditiously. In connection with such corrective or remedial action, City may exclude
Contractor from all or part of the Site, take possession of all or part of the Work and suspend
Contractor’s services related thereto, and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment
incorporated in the Work, stored at the Site or for which City has paid Contractor but which are
00 73 10- 32
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 32 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow City, City’s representatives, agents, consultants,
employees, and City’s other contractors, access to the Site to enable City to exercise the rights
and remedies under this Paragraph.
C. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of
engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution
costs) incurred or sustained by City in exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph
13.09 will be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order will be issued incorporating the
necessary revisions in the Contract Documents with respect to the Work; and City shall be
entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price.
D. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Time because of any delay in the
performance of the Work attributable to the exercise of City’s rights and remedies under this
Paragraph 11.09.
ARTICLE 12 – COMPLETION
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title
Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all Work, materials, and equipment covered by any
Application for Payment will pass to City no later than the time of Final Acceptance and shall be
free and clear of all Liens.
12.02 Partial Utilization
A. Prior to Final Acceptance of all the Work, City may use or occupy any substantially completed
part of the Work which has specifically been identified in the Contract Documents, or which
City, determines constitutes a separately functioning and usable part of the Work that can be
used by City for its intended purpose without significant interference with Contractor’s
performance of the remainder of the Work. City at any time may notify Contractor in writing to
permit City to use or occupy any such part of the Work which City determines to be ready for its
intended use, subject to the following conditions:
1. Contractor at any time may notify City in writing that Contractor considers any such part of
the Work ready for its intended use.
2. Within a reasonable time after notification as enumerated in Paragraph 14.05.A.1, City and
Contractor shall make an inspection of that part of the Work to determine its status of
completion. If City does not consider that part of the Work to be substantially complete, City
will notify Contractor in writing giving the reasons therefor.
3. Partial Utilization will not constitute Final Acceptance by City.
12.03 Final Inspection
A. Upon written notice from Contractor that the entire Work is complete in accordance with the
Contract Documents:
00 73 10- 33
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 33 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. within 10 days, City will schedule a Final Inspection with Contractor.
2. City will notify Contractor in writing of all particulars in which this inspection reveals that
the Work is incomplete or defective. Contractor shall immediately take such measures as are
necessary to complete such Work or remedy such deficiencies.
12.04 Final Acceptance
A. Upon completion by Contractor to City’s satisfaction, of any additional Work identified in the
Final Inspection, City will issue to Contractor a letter of Final Acceptance upon the satisfaction
of the following:
1. All documentation called for in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the
evidence of insurance required by Paragraph 5.03;
2. consent of the surety, if any, to Final Acceptance;
3. a list of all pending or released Damage Claims against City that Contractor believes are
unsettled; and
4. affidavits of payments and complete and legally effective releases or waivers (satisfactory to
City) of all Lien rights arising out of or Liens filed in connection with the Work.
5. after all Damage Claims have been resolved:
a. directly by the Contractor or;
b. Contractor provides evidence that the Damage Claim has been reported to Contractor’s
insurance provider for resolution.
6. Issuing Final Acceptance by the City shall not relieve the Contractor of any guarantees or
other requirements of the Contract Documents which specifically continue thereafter.
ARTICLE 13 – SUSPENSION OF WORK
13.01 City May Suspend Work
A. At any time and without cause, City may suspend the Work or any portion thereof by written
notice to Contractor and which may fix the date on which Work will be resumed. Contractor
shall resume the Work on the date so fixed. During temporary suspension of the Work covered
by these Contract Documents, for any reason, the City will stop contract time on City
participation projects.
B. Should the Contractor not be able to complete a portion of the Project due to causes beyond the
control of and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, and should it be determined by
mutual consent of the Contractor and City that a solution to allow construction to proceed is not
00 73 10- 34
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 34 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
available within a reasonable period of time, Contractor may request an extension in Contract
Time, directly attributable to any such suspension.
C. If it should become necessary to suspend the Work for an indefinite period, the Contractor shall
store all materials in such a manner that they will not obstruct or impede the public unnecessarily
nor become damaged in any way, and he shall take every precaution to prevent damage or
deterioration of the work performed; he shall provide suitable drainage about the work, and erect
temporary structures where necessary.
ARTICLE 14 – MISCELLANEOUS
14.01 Giving Notice
A. Whenever any provision of the Contract Documents requires the giving of written notice, it will
be deemed to have been validly given if:
1. delivered in person to the individual or to a member of the firm or to an officer of the
corporation for whom it is intended; or
2. delivered at or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the last business
address known to the giver of the notice.
B. Business address changes must be promptly made in writing to the other party.
C. Whenever the Contract Documents specifies giving notice by electronic means such electronic
notice shall be deemed sufficient upon confirmation of receipt by the receiving party.
14.02 Computation of Times
When any period of time is referred to in the Contract Documents by days, it will be computed to
exclude the first and include the last day of such period. If the last day of any such period falls on a
Saturday or Sunday or on a day made a legal holiday the next Working Day shall become the last
day of the period.
14.03 Cumulative Remedies
The duties and obligations imposed by these General Conditions and the rights and remedies
available hereunder to the parties hereto are in addition to, and are not to be construed in any way as
a limitation of, any rights and remedies available to any or all of them which are otherwise imposed
or available by Laws or Regulations, by special warranty or guarantee, or by other provisions of the
Contract Documents. The provisions of this Paragraph will be as effective as if repeated specifically
in the Contract Documents in connection with each particular duty, obligation, right, and remedy to
which they apply.
00 73 10- 35
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 35 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.04 Survival of Obligations
All representations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in
accordance with the Contract Documents, as well as all continuing obligations indicated in the
Contract Documents, will survive final payment, completion, and acceptance of the Work or
termination or completion of the Contract or termination of the services of Contractor.
14.05 Headings
Article and paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute parts of these
General Conditions.
01 11 00 - 1
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects City Project No. 103516
Revised December 20, 2012
SECTION 01 11 00 1
SUMMARY OF WORK 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes: 5
1. Summary of Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents 6
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 7
1. None. 8
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 9
1. Division 0 - Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and Conditions of the Contract 10
2. Division 1 - General Requirements 11
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 12
A. Measurement and Payment 13
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. 14
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 15
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 16
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 17
A. Work Covered by Contract Documents 18
1. Work is to include furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing 19
all Work necessary for this construction project as detailed in the Drawings and 20
Specifications. 21
B. Subsidiary Work 22
1. Any and all Work specifically governed by documentary requirements for the 23
project, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or Contract Documents in 24
which no specific item for bid has been provided for in the Proposal and the item is 25
not a typical unit bid item included on the standard bid item list, then the item shall 26
be considered as a subsidiary item of Work, the cost of which shall be included in 27
the price bid in the Proposal for various bid items. 28
C. Use of Premises 29
1. Coordinate uses of premises under direction of the City. 30
2. Assume full responsibility for protection and safekeeping of materials and 31
equipment stored on the Site. 32
3. Use and occupy only portions of the public streets and alleys, or other public places 33
or other rights-of-way as provided for in the ordinances of the City, as shown in the 34
Contract Documents, or as may be specifically authorized in writing by the City. 35
a. A reasonable amount of tools, materials, and equipment for construction 36
purposes may be stored in such space, but no more than is necessary to avoid 37
delay in the construction operations. 38
01 11 00 - 2
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects City Project No. 103516
Revised December 20, 2012
b. Excavated and waste materials shall be stored in such a way as not to interfere 1
with the use of spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed 2
and so as not to inconvenience occupants of adjacent property. 3
c. If the street is occupied by railroad tracks, the Work shall be carried on in such 4
manner as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad. 5
1) All Work shall be in accordance with railroad requirements set forth in 6
Division 0 as well as the railroad permit. 7
D. Work within Easements 8
1. Do not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously 9
obtained permission from the owner of such property. 10
2. Do not store equipment or material on private property unless and until the 11
specified approval of the property owner has been secured in writing by the 12
Contractor and a copy furnished to the City. 13
3. Unless specifically provided otherwise, clear all rights-of-way or easements of 14
obstructions which must be removed to make possible proper prosecution of the 15
Work as a part of the project construction operations. 16
4. Preserve and use every precaution to prevent damage to, all trees, shrubbery, plants, 17
lawns, fences, culverts, curbing, and all other types of structures or improvements, 18
to all water, sewer, and gas lines, to all conduits, overhead pole lines, or 19
appurtenances thereof, including the construction of temporary fences and to all 20
other public or private property adjacent to the Work. 21
5. Notify the proper representatives of the owners or occupants of the public or private 22
lands of interest in lands which might be affected by the Work. 23
a. Such notice shall be made at least 48 hours in advance of the beginning of the 24
Work. 25
b. Notices shall be applicable to both public and private utility companies and any 26
corporation, company, individual, or other, either as owners or occupants, 27
whose land or interest in land might be affected by the Work. 28
c. Be responsible for all damage or injury to property of any character resulting 29
from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in the manner or method or 30
execution of the Work, or at any time due to defective work, material, or 31
equipment. 32
6. Fence 33
a. Restore all fences encountered and removed during construction of the Project 34
to the original or a better than original condition. 35
b. Erect temporary fencing in place of the fencing removed whenever the Work is 36
not in progress and when the site is vacated overnight, and/or at all times to 37
provide site security. 38
c. The cost for all fence work within easements, including removal, temporary 39
closures and replacement, shall be subsidiary to the various items bid in the 40
project proposal, unless a bid item is specifically provided in the proposal. 41
01 11 00 - 3
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects City Project No. 103516
Revised December 20, 2012
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 3
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 4
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 5
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 6
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 7
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 8
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 9
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 10
END OF SECTION 11
12
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
13
01 25 00 - 1
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 25 00
SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. The procedure for requesting the approval of substitution of a product that is not
equivalent to a product which is specified by descriptive or performance criteria or
defined by reference to 1 or more of the following:
a. Name of manufacturer
b. Name of vendor
c. Trade name
d. Catalog number
2. Substitutions are not "or-equals".
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No
separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Request for Substitution - General
1. Within 30 days after award of Contract (unless noted otherwise), the City will
consider formal requests from Contractor for substitution of products in place of
those specified.
2. Certain types of equipment and kinds of material are described in Specifications by
means of references to names of manufacturers and vendors, trade names, or catalog
numbers.
a. When this method of specifying is used, it is not intended to exclude from
consideration other products bearing other manufacturer's or vendor's names,
trade names, or catalog numbers, provided said products are "or-equals," as
determined by City.
3. Other types of equipment and kinds of material may be acceptable substitutions
under the following conditions:
a. Or-equals are unavailable due to strike, discontinued production of products
meeting specified requirements, or other factors beyond control of Contractor;
or,
01 25 00 - 2
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
b. Contractor proposes a cost and/or time reduction incentive to the City.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. See Request for Substitution Form (attached)
B. Procedure for Requesting Substitution
1. Substitution shall be considered only:
a. After award of Contract
b. Under the conditions stated herein
2. Submit 3 copies of each written request for substitution, including:
a. Documentation
1) Complete data substantiating compliance of proposed substitution with
Contract Documents
2) Data relating to changes in construction schedule, when a reduction is
proposed
3) Data relating to changes in cost
b. For products
1) Product identification
a) Manufacturer's name
b) Telephone number and representative contact name
c) Specification Section or Drawing reference of originally specified
product, including discrete name or tag number assigned to original
product in the Contract Documents
2) Manufacturer's literature clearly marked to show compliance of proposed
product with Contract Documents
3) Itemized comparison of original and proposed product addressing product
characteristics including, but not necessarily limited to:
a) Size
b) Composition or materials of construction
c) Weight
d) Electrical or mechanical requirements
4) Product experience
a) Location of past projects utilizing product
b) Name and telephone number of persons associated with referenced
projects knowledgeable concerning proposed product
c) Available field data and reports associated with proposed product
5) Samples
a) Provide at request of City.
b) Samples become the property of the City.
c. For construction methods:
1) Detailed description of proposed method
2) Illustration drawings
C. Approval or Rejection
1. Written approval or rejection of substitution given by the City
2. City reserves the right to require proposed product to comply with color and pattern
of specified product if necessary to secure design intent.
3. In the event the substitution is approved, if a reduction in cost or time results, it will
be documented by Change Order.
01 25 00 - 3
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
4. Substitution will be rejected if:
a. Submittal is not through the Contractor with his stamp of approval
b. Request is not made in accordance with this Specification Section
c. In the Developer’s opinion, acceptance will require substantial revision of the
original design
d. In the City’s or Developer’s opinion, substitution will not perform adequately
the function consistent with the design intent
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. In making request for substitution or in using an approved product, the Contractor
represents that the Contractor:
1. Has investigated proposed product, and has determined that it is adequate or
superior in all respects to that specified, and that it will perform function for which it
is intended
2. Will provide same guarantee for substitute item as for product specified
3. Will coordinate installation of accepted substitution into Work, to include building
modifications if necessary, making such changes as may be required for Work to be
complete in all respects
4. Waives all claims for additional costs related to substitution which subsequently
arise
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 25 00 - 4
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION FORM:
TO:
PROJECT: DATE:
We hereby submit for your consideration the following product instead of the specified item for
the above project:
SECTION PARAGRAPH SPECIFIED ITEM
Proposed Substitution:
Reason for Substitution:
Include complete information on changes to Drawings and/or Specifications which proposed
substitution will require for its proper installation.
Fill in Blanks Below:
A. Will the undersigned contractor pay for changes to the building design, including engineering
and detailing costs caused by the requested substitution?
B. What effect does substitution have on other trades?
C. Differences between proposed substitution and specified item?
D. Differences in product cost or product delivery time?
E. Manufacturer's guarantees of the proposed and specified items are:
Equal Better (explain on attachment)
The undersigned states that the function, appearance and quality are equivalent or superior to the
specified item.
Submitted By: For Use by City
Signature Recommended Recommended
as noted
Firm Not recommended Received late
Address By
Date
Date Remarks
Telephone
For Use by City:
Approved Rejected
City Date
01 31 19 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 31 19
PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Provisions for the preconstruction meeting to be held prior to the start of Work to
clarify construction contract administration procedures
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. No construction schedule required unless requested by the City.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Coordination
1. Attend preconstruction meeting.
2. Representatives of Contractor, subcontractors and suppliers attending meetings
shall be qualified and authorized to act on behalf of the entity each represents.
3. Meeting administered by City may be tape recorded.
a. If recorded, tapes will be used to prepare minutes and retained by City for
future reference.
B. Preconstruction Meeting
1. A preconstruction meeting will be held within 14 days after the delivery of the
distribution package to the City.
a. The meeting will be scheduled and administered by the City.
2. The Project Representative will preside at the meeting, prepare the notes of the
meeting and distribute copies of same to all participants who so request by fully
completing the attendance form to be circulated at the beginning of the meeting.
3. Attendance shall include:
a. Developer and Consultant
b. Contractor's project manager
c. Contractor's superintendent
d. Any subcontractor or supplier representatives whom the Contractor may desire
to invite or the City may request
01 31 19 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
e. Other City representatives
f. Others as appropriate
4. Preliminary Agenda may include:
a. Introduction of Project Personnel
b. General Description of Project
c. Status of right-of-way, utility clearances, easements or other pertinent permits
d. Contractor’s work plan and schedule
e. Contract Time
f. Notice to Proceed
g. Construction Staking
h. Progress Payments
i. Extra Work and Change Order Procedures
j. Field Orders
k. Disposal Site Letter for Waste Material
l. Insurance Renewals
m. Payroll Certification
n. Material Certifications and Quality Control Testing
o. Public Safety and Convenience
p. Documentation of Pre-Construction Conditions
q. Weekend Work Notification
r. Legal Holidays
s. Trench Safety Plans
t. Confined Space Entry Standards
u. Coordination with the City’s representative for operations of existing water
systems
v. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
w. Coordination with other Contractors
x. Early Warning System
y. Contractor Evaluation
z. Special Conditions applicable to the project
aa. Damages Claims
bb. Submittal Procedures
cc. Substitution Procedures
dd. Correspondence Routing
ee. Record Drawings
ff. Temporary construction facilities
gg. MBE/SBE procedures
hh. Final Acceptance
ii. Final Payment
jj. Questions or Comments
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
01 31 19 - 3
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 3 of 3
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 32 33 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 32 33
PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Administrative and procedural requirements for:
a. Preconstruction Videos
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. Though not mandatory, it is highly recommended on infill developer projects.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Preconstruction Video
1. Produce a preconstruction video of the site/alignment, including all areas in the
vicinity of and to be affected by construction.
a. Provide digital copy of video upon request by the City.
2. Retain a copy of the preconstruction video until the end of the maintenance surety
period.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
01 32 33 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 33 00 - 1
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 33 00
DAP SUBMITTALS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. General methods and requirements of submissions applicable to the following
Work-related submittals:
a. Shop Drawings
b. Product Data (including Standard Product List submittals)
c. Samples
d. Mock Ups
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Coordination
1. Notify the City in writing, at the time of submittal, of any deviations in the
submittals from the requirements of the Contract Documents.
2. Coordination of Submittal Times
a. Prepare, prioritize and transmit each submittal sufficiently in advance of
performing the related Work or other applicable activities, or within the time
specified in the individual Work Sections, of the Specifications.
b. Contractor is responsible such that the installation will not be delayed by
processing times including, but not limited to:
a) Disapproval and resubmittal (if required)
b) Coordination with other submittals
c) Testing
d) Purchasing
e) Fabrication
f) Delivery
g) Similar sequenced activities
c. No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to
transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the Work.
01 33 00 - 2
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
d. Make submittals promptly in accordance with approved schedule, and in such
sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the work of any other
contractor.
B. Submittal Numbering
1. When submitting shop drawings or samples, utilize a 9-character submittal cross-
reference identification numbering system in the following manner:
a. Use the first 6 digits of the applicable Specification Section Number.
b. For the next 2 digits number use numbers 01-99 to sequentially number each
initial separate item or drawing submitted under each specific Section number.
c. Last use a letter, A-Z, indicating the resubmission of the same drawing (i.e.
A=2nd submission, B=3rd submission, C=4th submission, etc.). A typical
submittal number would be as follows:
03 30 00-08-B
1) 03 30 00 is the Specification Section for Concrete
2) 08 is the eighth initial submittal under this Specification Section
3) B is the third submission (second resubmission) of that particular shop
drawing
C. Contractor Certification
1. Review shop drawings, product data and samples, including those by
subcontractors, prior to submission to determine and verify the following:
a. Field measurements
b. Field construction criteria
c. Catalog numbers and similar data
d. Conformance with the Contract Documents
2. Provide each shop drawing, sample and product data submitted by the Contractor
with a Certification Statement affixed including:
a. The Contractor's Company name
b. Signature of submittal reviewer
c. Certification Statement
1) “By this submittal, I hereby represent that I have determined and verified
field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions,
catalog numbers and similar data and I have checked and coordinated each
item with other applicable approved shop drawings."
D. Submittal Format
1. Fold shop drawings larger than 8 ½ inches x 11 inches to 8 ½ inches x 11inches.
2. Bind shop drawings and product data sheets together.
3. Order
a. Cover Sheet
1) Description of Packet
2) Contractor Certification
b. List of items / Table of Contents
c. Product Data /Shop Drawings/Samples /Calculations
E. Submittal Content
1. The date of submission and the dates of any previous submissions
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 33 00 - 3
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 3 of 8
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
2. The Project title and number
3. Contractor identification
4. The names of:
a. Contractor
b. Supplier
c. Manufacturer
5. Identification of the product, with the Specification Section number, page and
paragraph(s)
6. Field dimensions, clearly identified as such
7. Relation to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials
8. Applicable standards, such as ASTM or Federal Specification numbers
9. Identification by highlighting of deviations from Contract Documents
10. Identification by highlighting of revisions on resubmittals
11. An 8-inch x 3-inch blank space for Contractor and City stamps
F. Shop Drawings
1. As specified in individual Work Sections includes, but is not necessarily limited to:
a. Custom-prepared data such as fabrication and erection/installation (working)
drawings
b. Scheduled information
c. Setting diagrams
d. Actual shopwork manufacturing instructions
e. Custom templates
f. Special wiring diagrams
g. Coordination drawings
h. Individual system or equipment inspection and test reports including:
1) Performance curves and certifications
i. As applicable to the Work
2. Details
a. Relation of the various parts to the main members and lines of the structure
b. Where correct fabrication of the Work depends upon field measurements
1) Provide such measurements and note on the drawings prior to submitting
for approval.
G. Product Data
1. For submittals of product data for products included on the City’s Standard Product
List, clearly identify each item selected for use on the Project.
2. For submittals of product data for products not included on the City’s Standard
Product List, submittal data may include, but is not necessarily limited to:
a. Standard prepared data for manufactured products (sometimes referred to as
catalog data)
1) Such as the manufacturer's product specification and installation
instructions
2) Availability of colors and patterns
3) Manufacturer's printed statements of compliances and applicability
4) Roughing-in diagrams and templates
5) Catalog cuts
6) Product photographs
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 33 00 - 4
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 4 of 8
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
7) Standard wiring diagrams
8) Printed performance curves and operational-range diagrams
9) Production or quality control inspection and test reports and certifications
10) Mill reports
11) Product operating and maintenance instructions and recommended
spare-parts listing and printed product warranties
12) As applicable to the Work
H. Samples
1. As specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to:
a. Physical examples of the Work such as:
1) Sections of manufactured or fabricated Work
2) Small cuts or containers of materials
3) Complete units of repetitively used products color/texture/pattern swatches
and range sets
4) Specimens for coordination of visual effect
5) Graphic symbols and units of Work to be used by the City for independent
inspection and testing, as applicable to the Work
I. Do not start Work requiring a shop drawing, sample or product data nor any material to
be fabricated or installed prior to the approval or qualified approval of such item.
1. Fabrication performed, materials purchased or on-site construction accomplished
which does not conform to approved shop drawings and data is at the Contractor's
risk.
2. The City will not be liable for any expense or delay due to corrections or remedies
required to accomplish conformity.
3. Complete project Work, materials, fabrication, and installations in conformance
with approved shop drawings, applicable samples, and product data.
J. Submittal Distribution
1. Electronic Distribution
a. Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be
uploaded to City’s Buzzsaw site, or another external FTP site approved by the
City.
b. Shop Drawings
1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
2) Hard Copies
a) 3 copies for all submittals
b) If Contractor requires more than 1 hard copy of Shop Drawings
returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed
above.
c. Product Data
1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
2) Hard Copies
a) 3 copies for all submittals
d. Samples
1) Distributed to the Project Representative
2. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 33 00 - 5
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 5 of 8
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
a. Shop Drawings
1) Distributed to the City
2) Copies
a) 8 copies for mechanical submittals
b) 7 copies for all other submittals
c) If Contractor requires more than 3 copies of Shop Drawings returned,
Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed above.
b. Product Data
1) Distributed to the City
2) Copies
a) 4 copies
c. Samples
1) Distributed to the Project Representative
2) Copies
a) Submit the number stated in the respective Specification Sections.
3. Distribute reproductions of approved shop drawings and copies of approved
product data and samples, where required, to the job site file and elsewhere as
directed by the City.
a. Provide number of copies as directed by the City but not exceeding the number
previously specified.
K. Submittal Review
1. The review of shop drawings, data and samples will be for general conformance
with the design concept and Contract Documents. This is not to be construed as:
a. Permitting any departure from the Contract requirements
b. Relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including details,
dimensions, and materials
c. Approving departures from details furnished by the City, except as otherwise
provided herein
2. The review and approval of shop drawings, samples or product data by the City
does not relieve the Contractor from his/her responsibility with regard to the
fulfillment of the terms of the Contract.
a. All risks of error and omission are assumed by the Contractor, and the City will
have no responsibility therefore.
3. The Contractor remains responsible for details and accuracy, for coordinating the
Work with all other associated work and trades, for selecting fabrication processes,
for techniques of assembly and for performing Work in a safe manner.
4. If the shop drawings, data or samples as submitted describe variations and show a
departure from the Contract requirements which City finds to be in the interest of
the City and to be so minor as not to involve a change in Contract Price or time for
performance, the City may return the reviewed drawings without noting an
exception.
5. Submittals will be returned to the Contractor under 1 of the following codes:
a. Code 1
1) "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" is assigned when there are no notations or
comments on the submittal.
a) When returned under this code the Contractor may release the
equipment and/or material for manufacture.
b. Code 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 33 00 - 6
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 6 of 8
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED". This code is assigned when a confirmation of
the notations and comments IS NOT required by the Contractor.
a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the
final product.
c. Code 3
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED/RESUBMIT". This combination of codes is
assigned when notations and comments are extensive enough to require a
resubmittal of the package.
a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the
final product.
b) This resubmittal is to address all comments, omissions and
non-conforming items that were noted.
c) Resubmittal is to be received by the City within 15 Calendar Days of
the date of the City's transmittal requiring the resubmittal.
d. Code 4
1) "NOT APPROVED" is assigned when the submittal does not meet the
intent of the Contract Documents.
a) The Contractor must resubmit the entire package revised to bring the
submittal into conformance.
b) It may be necessary to resubmit using a different manufacturer/vendor
to meet the Contract Documents.
6. Resubmittals
a. Handled in the same manner as first submittals
1) Corrections other than requested by the City
2) Marked with revision triangle or other similar method
a) At Contractor’s risk if not marked
b. Submittals for each item will be reviewed no more than twice at the City’s
expense.
1) All subsequent reviews will be performed at times convenient to the City
and at the Contractor's expense, based on the City's or City
Representative’s then prevailing rates.
2) Provide Contractor reimbursement to the City within 30 Calendar Days for
all such fees invoiced by the City.
c. The need for more than 1 resubmission or any other delay in obtaining City's
review of submittals, will not entitle the Contractor to an extension of Contract
Time.
7. Partial Submittals
a. City reserves the right to not review submittals deemed partial, at the City’s
discretion.
b. Submittals deemed by the City to be not complete will be returned to the
Contractor, and will be considered "Not Approved" until resubmitted.
c. The City may at its option provide a list or mark the submittal directing the
Contractor to the areas that are incomplete.
8. If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the shop drawings to
constitute a change to the Contract Documents, then written notice must be
provided thereof to the Developer at least 7 Calendar Days prior to release for
manufacture.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 33 00 - 7
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 7 of 8
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
9. When the shop drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the
Contractor may carry out the construction in accordance therewith and no further
changes therein except upon written instructions from the City.
10. Each submittal, appropriately coded, will be returned within 30 Calendar Days
following receipt of submittal by the City.
L. Mock ups
1. Mock Up units as specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily
limited to, complete units of the standard of acceptance for that type of Work to be
used on the Project. Remove at the completion of the Work or when directed.
M. Qualifications
1. If specifically required in other Sections of these Specifications, submit a P.E.
Certification for each item required.
N. Request for Information (RFI)
1. Contractor Request for additional information
a. Clarification or interpretation of the contract documents
b. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between Contract Documents
c. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between the Drawings and
Specifications
1) Identify the conflict and request clarification
2. Sufficient information shall be attached to permit a written response without further
information.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised August 30, 2013
01 33 00 - 8
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 8 of 8
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
12/20/2012 D. Johnson 1.4.K.8. Working Days modified to Calendar Days
01 35 13 - 1
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised August, 30, 2013
SECTION 01 35 13 1
SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes: 5
1. The procedures for special project circumstances that includes, but is not limited to: 6
a. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation 7
b. Work near High Voltage Lines 8
c. Confined Space Entry Program 9
d. Air Pollution Watch Days 10
e. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc. 11
f. Water Department Notification 12
g. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction 13
h. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers 14
i. Coordination within Railroad permits areas 15
j. Dust Control 16
k. Employee Parking 17
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 18
1. None. 19
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 20
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 21
2. Division 1 – General Requirements 22
3. Section 33 12 25 – Connection to Existing Water Mains 23
24
1.2 REFERENCES 25
A. Reference Standards 26
1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference 27
standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this 28
Specification, unless a date is specifically cited. 29
2. Health and Safety Code, Title 9. Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752. 30
High Voltage Overhead Lines. 31
3. North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) – Clean Construction 32
Specification 33
1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 34
A. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation 35
1. When work in the right-of-way which is under the jurisdiction of the Texas 36
Department of Transportation (TxDOT): 37
a. Notify the Texas Department of Transportation prior to commencing any work 38
therein in accordance with the provisions of the permit 39
01 35 13 - 2
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised August, 30, 2013
b. All work performed in the TxDOT right-of-way shall be performed in 1
compliance with and subject to approval from the Texas Department of 2
Transportation 3
B. Work near High Voltage Lines 4
1. Regulatory Requirements 5
a. All Work near High Voltage Lines (more than 600 volts measured between 6
conductors or between a conductor and the ground) shall be in accordance with 7
Health and Safety Code, Title 9, Subtitle A, Chapter 752. 8
2. Warning sign 9
a. Provide sign of sufficient size meeting all OSHA requirements. 10
3. Equipment operating within 10 feet of high voltage lines will require the following 11
safety features 12
a. Insulating cage-type of guard about the boom or arm 13
b. Insulator links on the lift hook connections for back hoes or dippers 14
c. Equipment must meet the safety requirements as set forth by OSHA and the 15
safety requirements of the owner of the high voltage lines 16
4. Work within 6 feet of high voltage electric lines 17
a. Notification shall be given to: 18
1) The power company (example: ONCOR) 19
a) Maintain an accurate log of all such calls to power company and record 20
action taken in each case. 21
b. Coordination with power company 22
1) After notification coordinate with the power company to: 23
a) Erect temporary mechanical barriers, de-energize the lines, or raise or 24
lower the lines 25
c. No personnel may work within 6 feet of a high voltage line before the above 26
requirements have been met. 27
C. Confined Space Entry Program 28
1. Provide and follow approved Confined Space Entry Program in accordance with 29
OSHA requirements. 30
2. Confined Spaces include: 31
a. Manholes 32
b. All other confined spaces in accordance with OSHA’s Permit Required for 33
Confined Spaces 34
D. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc. 35
1. When Contract Documents permit on the project the following will apply: 36
a. Public Notification 37
1) Submit notice to City and proof of adequate insurance coverage, 24 hours 38
prior to commencing. 39
2) Minimum 24 hour public notification in accordance with Section 01 31 13 40
E. Water Department Coordination 41
1. During the construction of this project, it will be necessary to deactivate, for a 42
period of time, existing lines. The Contractor shall be required to coordinate with 43
the Water Department to determine the best times for deactivating and activating 44
those lines. 45
01 35 13 - 3
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised August, 30, 2013
2. Coordinate any event that will require connecting to or the operation of an existing 1
City water line system with the City’s representative. 2
a. Coordination shall be in accordance with Section 33 12 25. 3
b. If needed, obtain a hydrant water meter from the Water Department for use 4
during the life of named project. 5
c. In the event that a water valve on an existing live system be turned off and on 6
to accommodate the construction of the project is required, coordinate this 7
activity through the appropriate City representative. 8
1) Do not operate water line valves of existing water system. 9
a) Failure to comply will render the Contractor in violation of Texas Penal 10
Code Title 7, Chapter 28.03 (Criminal Mischief) and the Contractor 11
will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. 12
b) In addition, the Contractor will assume all liabilities and 13
responsibilities as a result of these actions. 14
F. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction 15
1. Prior to beginning construction on any block in the project, on a block by block 16
basis, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of the pending construction to the front 17
door of each residence or business that will be impacted by construction. The notice 18
shall be prepared as follows: 19
a. Post notice or flyer 7 days prior to beginning any construction activity on each 20
block in the project area. 21
1) Prepare flyer on the Contractor’s letterhead and include the following 22
information: 23
a) Name of Project 24
b) City Project No (CPN) 25
c) Scope of Project (i.e. type of construction activity) 26
d) Actual construction duration within the block 27
e) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number 28
f) Name of the City’s inspector and phone number 29
g) City’s after-hours phone number 30
2) A sample of the ‘pre-construction notification’ flyer is attached as Exhibit 31
A. 32
3) Submit schedule showing the construction start and finish time for each 33
block of the project to the inspector. 34
4) Deliver flyer to the City Inspector for review prior to distribution. 35
b. No construction will be allowed to begin on any block until the flyer is 36
delivered to all residents of the block. 37
G. Public Notification of Temporary Water Service Interruption during Construction 38
1. In the event it becomes necessary to temporarily shut down water service to 39
residents or businesses during construction, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of 40
the pending interruption to the front door of each affected resident. 41
2. Prepared notice as follows: 42
a. The notification or flyer shall be posted 24 hours prior to the temporary 43
interruption. 44
b. Prepare flyer on the contractor’s letterhead and include the following 45
information: 46
1) Name of the project 47
2) City Project Number 48
01 35 13 - 4
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised August, 30, 2013
3) Date of the interruption of service 1
4) Period the interruption will take place 2
5) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number 3
6) Name of the City’s inspector and phone number 4
c. A sample of the temporary water service interruption notification is attached as 5
Exhibit B. 6
d. Deliver a copy of the temporary interruption notification to the City inspector 7
for review prior to being distributed. 8
e. No interruption of water service can occur until the flyer has been delivered to 9
all affected residents and businesses. 10
f. Electronic versions of the sample flyers can be obtained from the Project 11
Construction Inspector. 12
H. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 13
1. At locations in the Project where construction activities occur in areas where 14
USACE permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated 15
permit. 16
I. Coordination within Railroad Permit Areas 17
1. At locations in the project where construction activities occur in areas where 18
railroad permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated 19
railroad permit. This includes, but is not limited to, provisions for: 20
a. Flagmen 21
b. Inspectors 22
c. Safety training 23
d. Additional insurance 24
e. Insurance certificates 25
f. Other employees required to protect the right-of-way and property of the 26
Railroad Company from damage arising out of and/or from the construction of 27
the project. Proper utility clearance procedures shall be used in accordance 28
with the permit guidelines. 29
2. Obtain any supplemental information needed to comply with the railroad’s 30
requirements. 31
J. Dust Control 32
1. Use acceptable measures to control dust at the Site. 33
a. If water is used to control dust, capture and properly dispose of waste water. 34
b. If wet saw cutting is performed, capture and properly dispose of slurry. 35
K. Employee Parking 36
1. Provide parking for employees at locations approved by the City. 37
L. {Coordination with North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Clean 38
Construction Specification [if required for the project] 39
1. Comply with equipment, operational, reporting and enforcement requirements set 40
forth in NCTCOG’s Clean Construction Specification.} 41
01 35 13 - 5
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 5 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised August, 30, 2013
1.4 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1
1.5 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2
1.6 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 3
1.7 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 4
1.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 5
1.9 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 6
1.10 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 7
1.11 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 8
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 9
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 10
END OF SECTION 11
12
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson
1.3.B – Added requirement of compliance with Health and Safety Code, Title 9.
Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752. High Voltage Overhead Lines.
13
013�13-6
DAP SPECIAL PR�7ECT FROCEDLRES
Page 6 af 7
1
2
3
4
5
5
7
s
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
t�
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
�9
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
EXHIBIT A
{To be printed on Contract�r's Letterhead}
Date:
CPIV NO.:
Project Name:
Mapsco Lacation:
Limits of Construction:
�
THIS 15 T� INFflRM YDU THAT UNDER A C4NTRACT WITH THE CITY �F F�RT
W�RTH, �UR ��MPAMY WILL W�RK DN UTILITY LINES �N �R AR�UND YaUR
PROPERTY.
C�NSTRIJCTION WILL BEGIN APPR�XIMATELY SEVEN DAYS FR�M THE aATE
❑F TH15 N�TICE.
IF VOU HAVE QlJESTI�NS ABDUT ACCESS, SECURITY, SAFETY OR ANY flTHER
ISSUE, PLEASE CALL:
MC. C�pNTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT� AT CTELEPHONE N�.7
❑R
MC. C�ITY INSPECTOR� AT E TELEPH�NE NO.�
AFTER 4:3D PM QR ON WEEKEN05, PLEASE CALL [817� 392 8306
PLERS� KEEP 7N1S FLYER NANDY WNElV Y�t! �ALL
CTI'Y �F FdRI WORTH Wayfare Mnitifauuly (Civolo Hills Pa�Intim•1
STAlti`DARD CO1ti5IRLTCTION SPECIFICATIOl� DOCLTMEl� IS — DEVELOPEA AG�'AR�ED PROJECTS Cin• Project �Io. 103516
Rec-ised Au�ust, 3D, ?D 13
01 35 13 - 7
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 7 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised August, 30, 2013
EXHIBIT B 1
2
3
4
01 45 23
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised March 20, 2020
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 45 23
TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Testing and inspection services procedures and coordination
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
a. Contractor is responsible for performing, coordinating, and payment of all
Quality Control testing.
b. City is responsible for performing and payment for first set of Quality
Assurance testing.
1) If the first Quality Assurance test performed by the City fails, the
Contractor is responsible for payment of subsequent Quality Assurance
testing until a passing test occurs.
a) Final acceptance will not be issued by City until all required payments
for testing by Contractor have been paid in full.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Testing
1. Complete testing in accordance with the Contract Documents.
2. Coordination
a. When testing is required to be performed by the City, notify City, sufficiently
in advance, when testing is needed.
b. When testing is required to be completed by the Contractor, notify City,
sufficiently in advance, that testing will be performed.
3. Distribution of Testing Reports
a. Electronic Distribution
1) Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be
uploaded to the City’s document management system, or another form of
distribution approved by the City.
01 45 23
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised March 20, 2020
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
2) Upload test reports to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
3) Hard Copies
a) 1 copy for all submittals submitted to the Project Representative
b. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)
1) Tests performed by City
a) Distribute 1 hard copy to the Contractor
2) Tests performed by the Contractor
a) Distribute 3 hard copies to City’s Project Representative
4. Provide City’s Project Representative with trip tickets for each delivered load of
Concrete or Lime material including the following information:
a. Name of pit
b. Date of delivery
c. Material delivered
B. Inspection
1. Inspection or lack of inspection does not relieve the Contractor from obligation to
perform work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
03/20/2020 D.V. Magaña Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that electronic submittals be uploaded
through the City’s document management system.
01 50 00 - 1
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 50 00
TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Provide temporary facilities and controls needed for the Work including, but not
necessarily limited to:
a. Temporary utilities
b. Sanitary facilities
c. Storage Sheds and Buildings
d. Dust control
e. Temporary fencing of the construction site
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Temporary Utilities
1. Obtaining Temporary Service
a. Make arrangements with utility service companies for temporary services.
b. Abide by rules and regulations of utility service companies or authorities
having jurisdiction.
c. Be responsible for utility service costs until Work is approved for Final
Acceptance.
1) Included are fuel, power, light, heat and other utility services necessary for
execution, completion, testing and initial operation of Work.
2. Water
a. Contractor to provide water required for and in connection with Work to be
performed and for specified tests of piping, equipment, devices or other use as
required for the completion of the Work.
b. Provide and maintain adequate supply of potable water for domestic
consumption by Contractor personnel and City’s Project Representatives.
c. Coordination
1) Contact City 1 week before water for construction is desired
01 50 00 - 2
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
d. Contractor Payment for Construction Water
1) Obtain construction water meter from City for payment as billed by City’s
established rates.
3. Electricity and Lighting
a. Provide and pay for electric powered service as required for Work, including
testing of Work.
1) Provide power for lighting, operation of equipment, or other use.
b. Electric power service includes temporary power service or generator to
maintain operations during scheduled shutdown.
4. Telephone
a. Provide emergency telephone service at Site for use by Contractor personnel
and others performing work or furnishing services at Site.
5. Temporary Heat and Ventilation
a. Provide temporary heat as necessary for protection or completion of Work.
b. Provide temporary heat and ventilation to assure safe working conditions.
B. Sanitary Facilities
1. Provide and maintain sanitary facilities for persons on Site.
a. Comply with regulations of State and local departments of health.
2. Enforce use of sanitary facilities by construction personnel at job site.
a. Enclose and anchor sanitary facilities.
b. No discharge will be allowed from these facilities.
c. Collect and store sewage and waste so as not to cause nuisance or health
problem.
d. Haul sewage and waste off-site at no less than weekly intervals and properly
dispose in accordance with applicable regulation.
3. Locate facilities near Work Site and keep clean and maintained throughout Project.
4. Remove facilities at completion of Project
C. Storage Sheds and Buildings
1. Provide adequately ventilated, watertight, weatherproof storage facilities with floor
above ground level for materials and equipment susceptible to weather damage.
2. Storage of materials not susceptible to weather damage may be on blocks off
ground.
3. Store materials in a neat and orderly manner.
a. Place materials and equipment to permit easy access for identification,
inspection and inventory.
4. Equip building with lockable doors and lighting, and provide electrical service for
equipment space heaters and heating or ventilation as necessary to provide storage
environments acceptable to specified manufacturers.
5. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage away from
temporary and existing buildings.
6. Remove building from site prior to Final Acceptance.
D. Temporary Fencing
1. Provide and maintain for the duration or construction when required in contract
documents
E. Dust Control
01 50 00 - 3
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1. Contractor is responsible for maintaining dust control through the duration of the
project.
a. Contractor remains on-call at all times
b. Must respond in a timely manner
F. Temporary Protection of Construction
1. Contractor or subcontractors are responsible for protecting Work from damage due
to weather.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 INSTALLATION
A. Temporary Facilities
1. Maintain all temporary facilities for duration of construction activities as needed.
3.5 [REPAIR] / [RESTORATION]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES
A. Temporary Facilities
01 50 00 - 4
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised JULY 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1. Remove all temporary facilities and restore area after completion of the Work, to a
condition equal to or better than prior to start of Work.
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 55 26 - 1
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised July 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 55 26
STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Administrative procedures for:
a. Street Use Permit
b. Modification of approved traffic control
c. Removal of Street Signs
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 34 71 13 – Traffic Control
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES
A. Reference Standards
1. Reference standards cited in this specification refer to the current reference standard
published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
2. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD).
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Traffic Control
1. General
a. When traffic control plans are included in the Drawings, provide Traffic
Control in accordance with Drawings and Section 34 71 13.
b. When traffic control plans are not included in the Drawings, prepare traffic
control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13 and submit to City for
review.
1) Allow minimum 10 working days for review of proposed Traffic Control.
B. Street Use Permit
1. Prior to installation of Traffic Control, a City Street Use Permit is required.
a. To obtain Street Use Permit, submit Traffic Control Plans to City
Transportation and Public Works Department.
01 55 26 - 2
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised July 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1) Allow a minimum of 5 working days for permit review.
2) Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control plans for
Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed.
C. Modification to Approved Traffic Control
1. Prior to installation traffic control:
a. Submit revised traffic control plans to City Department Transportation and
Public Works Department.
1) Revise Traffic Control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13.
2) Allow minimum 5 working days for review of revised Traffic Control.
3) It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control
plans for Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed.
D. Removal of Street Sign
1. If it is determined that a street sign must be removed for construction, then contact
City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs and Markings Division to
remove the sign.
E. Temporary Signage
1. In the case of regulatory signs, replace permanent sign with temporary sign meeting
requirements of the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD).
2. Install temporary sign before the removal of permanent sign.
3. When construction is complete, to the extent that the permanent sign can be
reinstalled, contact the City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs
and Markings Division, to reinstall the permanent sign.
F. Traffic Control Standards
1. Traffic Control Standards can be found on the City’s Buzzsaw website.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
01 55 26 - 3
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised July 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 57 13 - 1
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised July 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 57 13
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Procedures for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the
Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 31 25 00 – Erosion and Sediment Control
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Construction Activities resulting in less than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items
bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
2. Construction Activities resulting in greater than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Measurement and Payment shall be in accordance with Section 31 25 00.
1.3 REFERENCES
A. Abbreviations and Acronyms
1. Notice of Intent: NOI
2. Notice of Termination: NOT
3. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: SWPPP
4. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality: TCEQ
5. Notice of Change: NOC
A. Reference Standards
1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference
standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
Specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
2. Integrated Storm Management (iSWM) Technical Manual for Construction
Controls
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. General
1. Contractor is responsible for resolution and payment of any fines issued associated
with compliance to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
01 57 13 - 2
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised July 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
B. Construction Activities resulting in:
1. Less than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with Section 31 25 00 and
Drawings.
2. 1 to less than 5 acres of disturbance
a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction
Permit is required
b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements
1) TCEQ Small Construction Site Notice Required under general permit
TXR150000
a) Sign and post at job site
b) Prior to Preconstruction Meeting, send 1 copy to City Department of
Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392-
6088.
2) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with:
a) Section 31 25 00
b) The Drawings
c) TXR150000 General Permit
d) SWPPP
e) TCEQ requirements
3. 5 acres or more of Disturbance
a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction
Permit is required
b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements
1) Prepare a TCEQ NOI form and submit to TCEQ along with required fee
a) Sign and post at job site
b) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works,
Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088.
2) TCEQ Notice of Change required if making changes or updates to NOI
3) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with:
a) Section 31 25 00
b) The Drawings
c) TXR150000 General Permit
d) SWPPP
e) TCEQ requirements
4) Once the project has been completed and all the closeout requirements of
TCEQ have been met a TCEQ Notice of Termination can be submitted.
a) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works,
Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. SWPPP
1. Submit in accordance with Section 01 33 00, except as stated herein.
a. Prior to the Preconstruction Meeting, submit a draft copy of SWPPP to the City
as follows:
1) 1 copy to the City Project Manager
a) City Project Manager will forward to the City Department of
Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division for review
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised July 1, 2011
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
01 57 13 - 3
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 3 of 3
B. Modified SWPPP
1. If the SWPPP is revised during construction, resubmit modified SWPPP to the City
in accordance with Section 01 33 00.
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 60 00
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised March 20, 2020
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 60 00
PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. References for Product Requirements and City Standard Products List
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES [NOT USED]
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A list of City approved products for use is available through the City’s website at:
https://apps.fortworthtexas.gov/ProjectResources/ and following the directory
path: 02 - Construction Documents\Standard Products List
A. Only products specifically included on City’s Standard Product List in these Contract
Documents shall be allowed for use on the Project.
1. Any subsequently approved products will only be allowed for use upon specific
approval by the City.
B. Any specific product requirements in the Contract Documents supersede similar
products included on the City’s Standard Product List.
1. The City reserves the right to not allow products to be used for certain projects even
though the product is listed on the City’s Standard Product List.
C. Although a specific product is included on City’s Standard Product List, not all
products from that manufacturer are approved for use, including but not limited to, that
manufacturer’s standard product.
D. See Section 01 33 00 for submittal requirements of Product Data included on City’s
Standard Product List.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
01 60 00
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised March 20, 2020
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
10/12/12 D. Johnson Modified Location of City’s Standard Product List
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
03/20/2020 D.V. Magaña Removed reference to Buzzsaw and noted that the City approved products list is
accessible through the City’s website.
01 66 00 - 1
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 66 00
PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Scheduling of product delivery
2. Packaging of products for delivery
3. Protection of products against damage from:
a. Handling
b. Exposure to elements or harsh environments
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY AND HANDLING
A. Delivery Requirements
1. Schedule delivery of products or equipment as required to allow timely installation
and to avoid prolonged storage.
2. Provide appropriate personnel and equipment to receive deliveries.
3. Delivery trucks will not be permitted to wait extended periods of time on the Site
for personnel or equipment to receive the delivery.
01 66 00 - 2
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
4. Deliver products or equipment in manufacturer's original unbroken cartons or other
containers designed and constructed to protect the contents from physical or
environmental damage.
5. Clearly and fully mark and identify as to manufacturer, item and installation
location.
6. Provide manufacturer's instructions for storage and handling.
B. Handling Requirements
1. Handle products or equipment in accordance with these Contract Documents and
manufacturer’s recommendations and instructions.
C. Storage Requirements
1. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations and
requirements of these Specifications.
2. Make necessary provisions for safe storage of materials and equipment.
a. Place loose soil materials and materials to be incorporated into Work to prevent
damage to any part of Work or existing facilities and to maintain free access at
all times to all parts of Work and to utility service company installations in
vicinity of Work.
3. Keep materials and equipment neatly and compactly stored in locations that will
cause minimum inconvenience to other contractors, public travel, adjoining owners,
tenants and occupants.
a. Arrange storage to provide easy access for inspection.
4. Restrict storage to areas available on construction site for storage of material and
equipment as shown on Drawings, or approved by City’s Project Representative.
5. Provide off-site storage and protection when on-site storage is not adequate.
a. Provide addresses of and access to off-site storage locations for inspection by
City’s Project Representative.
6. Do not use lawns, grass plots or other private property for storage purposes without
written permission of owner or other person in possession or control of premises.
7. Store in manufacturers’ unopened containers.
8. Neatly, safely and compactly stack materials delivered and stored along line of
Work to avoid inconvenience and damage to property owners and general public
and maintain at least 3 feet from fire hydrant.
9. Keep public and private driveways and street crossings open.
10. Repair or replace damaged lawns, sidewalks, streets or other improvements to
satisfaction of City’s Project Representative.
a. Total length which materials may be distributed along route of construction at
one time is 1,000 linear feet, unless otherwise approved in writing by City’s
Project Representative.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
01 66 00 - 3
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 4
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 ERECTION [NOT USED]
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL
A. Tests and Inspections
1. Inspect all products or equipment delivered to the site prior to unloading.
B. Non-Conforming Work
1. Reject all products or equipment that are damaged, used or in any other way
unsatisfactory for use on the project.
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION
A. Protect all products or equipment in accordance with manufacturer's written directions.
B. Store products or equipment in location to avoid physical damage to items while in
storage.
C. Protect equipment from exposure to elements and keep thoroughly dry if required by
the manufacturer.
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
01 66 00 - 4
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 70 00 - 1
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 103516
Revised November 22, 2016
SECTION 01 70 00 1
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION 2
3
PART 1 - GENERAL 4
1.1 SUMMARY 5
A. Section Includes: 6
1. Mobilization and Demobilization 7
a. Mobilization 8
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies 9
to the Site 10
2) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation 11
at the Site 12
3) Premiums paid for performance and payment bonds 13
4) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies 14
to another location within the designated Site 15
5) Relocation of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation 16
from 1 location to another location on the Site. 17
b. Demobilization 18
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies 19
away from the Site including disassembly 20
2) Site Clean-up 21
3) Removal of all buildings and/or other facilities assembled at the Site for this 22
Contract 23
c. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of 24
work that are for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract. 25
2. Remobilization 26
a. Remobilization for Suspension of Work specifically required in the Contract 27
Documents or as required by City includes: 28
1) Demobilization 29
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating 30
supplies from the Site including disassembly or temporarily securing 31
equipment, supplies, and other facilities as designated by the Contract 32
Documents necessary to suspend the Work. 33
b) Site Clean-up as designated in the Contract Documents 34
2) Remobilization 35
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating 36
supplies to the Site necessary to resume the Work. 37
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s 38
operation at the Site necessary to resume the Work. 39
3) No Payments will be made for: 40
a) Mobilization and Demobilization from one location to another on the 41
Site in the normal progress of performing the Work. 42
b) Stand-by or idle time 43
c) Lost profits 44
01 70 00 - 2
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 103516
Revised November 22, 2016
3. Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects 1
a. Mobilization and Demobilization 2
1) Mobilization shall consist of the activities and cost on a Work Order basis 3
necessary for: 4
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating 5
supplies to the Site for the issued Work Order. 6
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s 7
operation at the Site for the issued Work Order 8
2) Demobilization shall consist of the activities and cost necessary for: 9
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating 10
supplies from the Site including disassembly for each issued Work 11
Order 12
b) Site Clean-up for each issued Work Order 13
c) Removal of all buildings or other facilities assembled at the Site for 14
each Work Oder 15
b. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of 16
work for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract. 17
4. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects 18
a. A Mobilization for Miscellaneous Projects when directed by the City and the 19
mobilization occurs within 24 hours of the issuance of the Work Order. 20
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 21
1. None. 22
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 23
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 24
2. Division 1 – General Requirements 25
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 26
A. Measurement and Payment [Consult City Department/Division for direction on if 27
Mobilization pay item to be included or the item should be subsidiary. Include the 28
appropriate Section 1.2 A. 1.] 29
1. Mobilization and Demobilization 30
a. Measure 31
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 32
b. Payment 33
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 34
are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be 35
allowed. 36
2. Remobilization for suspension of Work as specifically required in the Contract 37
Documents 38
a. Measurement 39
1) Measurement for this Item shall be per each remobilization performed. 40
b. Payment 41
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 42
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit 43
price per each “Specified Remobilization” in accordance with Contract 44
Documents. 45
c. The price shall include: 46
01 70 00 - 3
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project No. 103516
Revised November 22, 2016
1) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.1) 1
2) Remobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.2) 2
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this 3
Item. 4
3. Remobilization for suspension of Work as required by City 5
a. Measurement and Payment 6
1) This shall be submitted as a Contract Claim in accordance with Article 10 7
of Section 00 72 00. 8
2) No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated 9
with this Item. 10
4. Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects 11
a. Measurement 12
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and 13
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents 14
b. Payment 15
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 16
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit 17
price per each “Work Order Mobilization” in accordance with Contract 18
Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to mobilization 19
and shall not be paid for separately. 20
c. The price shall include: 21
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.1) 22
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2) 23
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this 24
Item. 25
5. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects 26
a. Measurement 27
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and 28
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents 29
b. Payment 30
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 31
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit 32
price per each “Work Order Emergency Mobilization” in accordance with 33
Contract Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to 34
mobilization and shall not be paid for separately. 35
c. The price shall include 36
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.4.a) 37
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2) 38
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this 39
Item. 40
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 41
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 42
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 43
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 44
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 45
01 71 23 - 1
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 1 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised February 14, 2018
SECTION 01 71 23 1
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes: 5
1. Requirements for construction staking and construction survey 6
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification 7
1. See Changes (Highlighted in Yellow). 8
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 9
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 10
2. Division 1 – General Requirements 11
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 12
A. Measurement and Payment 13
1. Construction Staking 14
a. Measurement 15
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 16
b. Payment 17
1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this 18
Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will 19
be allowed. 20
2. Construction Survey 21
a. Measurement 22
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 23
b. Payment 24
1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this 25
Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be 26
allowed. 27
3. As-Built Survey 28
a. Measurement 29
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid. 30
b. Payment 31
1) The work performed and the materials furnished in accordance with this 32
Item are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be 33
allowed. 34
1.3 REFERENCES 35
A. Definitions 36
1. Construction Survey - The survey measurements made prior to or while 37
construction is in progress to control elevation, horizontal position, dimensions and 38
configuration of structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings. 39
01 71 23 - 2
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 2 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised February 14, 2018
2. As-built Survey –The measurements made after the construction of the 1
improvement features are complete to provide position coordinates for the features 2
of a project. 3
3. Construction Staking – The placement of stakes and markings to provide offsets 4
and elevations to cut and fill in order to locate on the ground the designed 5
structures/improvements included in the Project Drawings. Construction staking 6
shall include staking easements and/or right of way if indicated on the plans. 7
4. Survey “Field Checks” – Measurements made after construction staking is 8
completed and before construction work begins to ensure that structures marked on 9
the ground are accurately located per Project Drawings. 10
B. Technical References 11
1. City of Fort Worth – Construction Staking Standards (available on City’s Buzzsaw 12
website) – 01 71 23.16.01_ Attachment A_Survey Staking Standards 13
2. City of Fort Worth - Standard Survey Data Collector Library (fxl) files (available 14
on City’s Buzzsaw website). 15
3. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Survey Manual, latest revision 16
4. Texas Society of Professional Land Surveyors (TSPS), Manual of Practice for Land 17
Surveying in the State of Texas, Category 5 18
19
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 20
A. The Contractor’s selection of a surveyor must comply with Texas Government 21
Code 2254 (qualifications based selection) for this project. 22
1.5 SUBMITTALS 23
A. Submittals, if required, shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00. 24
B. All submittals shall be received and reviewed by the City prior to delivery of work. 25
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS 26
A. Field Quality Control Submittals 27
1. Documentation verifying accuracy of field engineering work, including coordinate 28
conversions if plans do not indicate grid or ground coordinates. 29
2. Submit “Cut-Sheets” conforming to the standard template provided by the City 30
(refer to 01 71 23.16.01 – Attachment A – Survey Staking Standards). 31
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS 32
B. As-built Redline Drawing Submittal 33
1. Submit As-Built Survey Redline Drawings documenting the locations/elevations of 34
constructed improvements signed and sealed by Registered Professional Land 35
Surveyor (RPLS) responsible for the work (refer to 01 71 23.16.01 – Attachment A 36
– Survey Staking Standards) . 37
2. Contractor shall submit the proposed as-built and completed redline drawing 38
submittal one (1) week prior to scheduling the project final inspection for City 39
review and comment. Revisions, if necessary, shall be made to the as-built redline 40
drawings and resubmitted to the City prior to scheduling the construction final 41
inspection. 42
01 71 23 - 3
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 3 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised February 14, 2018
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE 2
A. Construction Staking 3
1. Construction staking will be performed by the Contractor. 4
2. Coordination 5
a. Contact City and Developer’s Project Representative at least one week in 6
advance notifying the City of when Construction Staking is scheduled. 7
b. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate staking such that 8
construction activities are not delayed or negatively impacted. 9
3. General 10
a. Contractor is responsible for preserving and maintaining stakes. If 11
Developer’s Project Representative is required to re-stake for any reason, the 12
Contractor will be responsible for costs to perform staking. If in the opinion of 13
the City, a sufficient number of stakes or markings have been lost, destroyed 14
disturbed or omitted that the contracted Work cannot take place then the 15
Contractor will be required to stake or re-stake the deficient areas. 16
B. Construction Survey 17
1. Construction Survey will be performed by the Contractor. 18
2. Coordination 19
a. Contractor to verify that horizontal and vertical control data established in the 20
design survey and required for construction survey is available and in place. 21
3. General 22
a. Construction survey will be performed in order to construct the work shown 23
on the Construction Drawings and specified in the Contract Documents. 24
b. For construction methods other than open cut, the Contractor shall perform 25
construction survey and verify control data including, but not limited to, the 26
following: 27
1) Verification that established benchmarks and control are accurate. 28
2) Use of Benchmarks to furnish and maintain all reference lines and grades 29
for tunneling. 30
3) Use of line and grades to establish the location of the pipe. 31
4) Submit to the City copies of field notes used to establish all lines and 32
grades, if requested, and allow the City to check guidance system setup prior 33
to beginning each tunneling drive. 34
5) Provide access for the City, if requested, to verify the guidance system and 35
the line and grade of the carrier pipe. 36
6) The Contractor remains fully responsible for the accuracy of the work and 37
correction of it, as required. 38
7) Monitor line and grade continuously during construction. 39
8) Record deviation with respect to design line and grade once at each pipe 40
joint and submit daily records to the City. 41
9) If the installation does not meet the specified tolerances (as outlined in 42
Sections 33 05 23 and/or 33 05 24), immediately notify the City and correct 43
the installation in accordance with the Contract Documents. 44
C. As-Built Survey 45
1. Required As-Built Survey will be performed by the Contractor. 46
01 71 23 - 4
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 4 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised February 14, 2018
2. Coordination 1
a. Contractor is to coordinate with City to confirm which features require as-2
built surveying. 3
b. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate the as-built survey and 4
required measurements for items that are to be buried such that construction 5
activities are not delayed or negatively impacted. 6
c. For sewer mains and water mains 12” and under in diameter, it is acceptable 7
to physically measure depth and mark the location during the progress of 8
construction and take as-built survey after the facility has been buried. The 9
Contractor is responsible for the quality control needed to ensure accuracy. 10
3. General 11
a. The Contractor shall provide as-built survey including the elevation and 12
location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction 13
features during the progress of the construction including the following: 14
1) Water Lines 15
a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for waterlines at the following 16
locations: 17
(1) Minimum every 250 linear feet, including 18
(2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature, 19
etc. 20
(3) Fire line tee 21
(4) Plugs, stub-outs, dead-end lines 22
(5) Casing pipe (each end) and all buried fittings 23
2) Sanitary Sewer 24
a) Top of pipe elevations and coordinates for force mains and siphon 25
sanitary sewer lines (non-gravity facilities) at the following locations: 26
(1) Minimum every 250 linear feet and any buried fittings 27
(2) Horizontal and vertical points of inflection, curvature, 28
etc. 29
3) Stormwater – Not Applicable 30
b. The Contractor shall provide as-built survey including the elevation and 31
location (and provide written documentation to the City) of construction 32
features after the construction is completed including the following: 33
1) Manholes 34
a) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each manhole 35
2) Water Lines 36
a) Cathodic protection test stations 37
b) Sampling stations 38
c) Meter boxes/vaults (All sizes) 39
d) Fire hydrants 40
e) Valves (gate, butterfly, etc.) 41
f) Air Release valves (Manhole rim and vent pipe) 42
g) Blow off valves (Manhole rim and valve lid) 43
h) Pressure plane valves 44
i) Underground Vaults 45
(1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each 46
Underground Vault. 47
3) Sanitary Sewer 48
a) Cleanouts 49
(1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each 50
01 71 23 - 5
CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEY
Page 5 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project No. 103516
Revised February 14, 2018
b) Manholes and Junction Structures 1
(1) Rim and flowline elevations and coordinates for each 2
manhole and junction structure. 3
4) Stormwater – Not Applicable 4
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 5
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 6
1.12 WARRANTY 7
PART 2 - PRODUCTS 8
A. A construction survey will produce, but will not be limited to: 9
1. Recovery of relevant control points, points of curvature and points of intersection. 10
2. Establish temporary horizontal and vertical control elevations (benchmarks) 11
sufficiently permanent and located in a manner to be used throughout construction. 12
3. The location of planned facilities, easements and improvements. 13
a. Establishing final line and grade stakes for piers, floors, grade beams, parking 14
areas, utilities, streets, highways, tunnels, and other construction. 15
b. A record of revisions or corrections noted in an orderly manner for reference. 16
c. A drawing, when required by the client, indicating the horizontal and vertical 17
location of facilities, easements and improvements, as built. 18
4. Cut sheets shall be provided to the City inspector and Survey Superintendent for all 19
construction staking projects. These cut sheets shall be on the standard city template 20
which can be obtained from the Survey Superintendent (817-392-7925). 21
5. Digital survey files in the following formats shall be acceptable: 22
a. AutoCAD (.dwg) 23
b. ESRI Shapefile (.shp) 24
c. CSV file (.csv), formatted with X and Y coordinates in separate columns (use 25
standard templates, if available) 26
6. Survey files shall include vertical and horizontal data tied to original project 27
control and benchmarks, and shall include feature descriptions 28
PART 3 - EXECUTION 29
3.1 INSTALLERS 30
A. Tolerances: 31
1. The staked location of any improvement or facility should be as accurate as 32
practical and necessary. The degree of precision required is dependent on many 33
factors all of which must remain judgmental. The tolerances listed hereafter are 34
based on generalities and, under certain circumstances, shall yield to specific 35
requirements. The surveyor shall assess any situation by review of the overall plans 36
and through consultation with responsible parties as to the need for specific 37
tolerances. 38
a. Earthwork: Grades for earthwork or rough cut should not exceed 0.1 ft. vertical 39
tolerance. Horizontal alignment for earthwork and rough cut should not exceed 40
1.0 ft. tolerance. 41
01 74 23 - 1
DAP CLEANING
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 74 23
CLEANING
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Intermediate and final cleaning for Work not including special cleaning of closed
systems specified elsewhere
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 32 92 13 – Hydro-Mulching, Seeding and Sodding
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Scheduling
1. Schedule cleaning operations so that dust and other contaminants disturbed by
cleaning process will not fall on newly painted surfaces.
2. Schedule final cleaning upon completion of Work and immediately prior to final
inspection.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 STORAGE, AND HANDLING
A. Storage and Handling Requirements
1. Store cleaning products and cleaning wastes in containers specifically designed for
those materials.
01 74 23 - 2
DAP CLEANING
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED]
2.2 MATERIALS
A. Cleaning Agents
1. Compatible with surface being cleaned
2. New and uncontaminated
3. For manufactured surfaces
a. Material recommended by manufacturer
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 APPLICATION [NOT USED]
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING
A. General
1. Prevent accumulation of wastes that create hazardous conditions.
2. Conduct cleaning and disposal operations to comply with laws and safety orders of
governing authorities.
3. Do not dispose of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits, oil or paint thinner in
storm or sanitary drains or sewers.
4. Dispose of degradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site.
5. Dispose of nondegradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site or in an
alternate manner approved by City and regulatory agencies.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 74 23 - 3
DAP CLEANING
Page 3 of 4
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
6. Handle materials in a controlled manner with as few handlings as possible.
7. Thoroughly clean, sweep, wash and polish all Work and equipment associated with
this project.
8. Remove all signs of temporary construction and activities incidental to construction
of required permanent Work.
9. If project is not cleaned to the satisfaction of the City, the City reserves the right to
have the cleaning completed at the expense of the Contractor.
10. Do not burn on-site.
B. Intermediate Cleaning during Construction
1. Keep Work areas clean so as not to hinder health, safety or convenience of
personnel in existing facility operations.
2. At maximum weekly intervals, dispose of waste materials, debris and rubbish.
3. Confine construction debris daily in strategically located container(s):
a. Cover to prevent blowing by wind
b. Store debris away from construction or operational activities
c. Haul from site at a minimum of once per week
4. Vacuum clean interior areas when ready to receive finish painting.
a. Continue vacuum cleaning on an as-needed basis, until Final Acceptance.
5. Prior to storm events, thoroughly clean site of all loose or unsecured items, which
may become airborne or transported by flowing water during the storm.
C. Exterior (Site or Right of Way) Final Cleaning
1. Remove trash and debris containers from site.
a. Re-seed areas disturbed by location of trash and debris containers in accordance
with Section 32 92 13.
2. Sweep roadway to remove all rocks, pieces of asphalt, concrete or any other object
that may hinder or disrupt the flow of traffic along the roadway.
3. Clean any interior areas including, but not limited to, vaults, manholes, structures,
junction boxes and inlets.
4. If no longer required for maintenance of erosion facilities, and upon approval by
City, remove erosion control from site.
5. Clean signs, lights, signals, etc.
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 74 23 - 4
DAP CLEANING
Page 4 of 4
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 77 19 - 1
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 77 19
CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. The procedure for closing out a contract
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Guarantees, Bonds and Affidavits
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until all guarantees, bonds,
certificates, licenses and affidavits required for Work or equipment as specified are
satisfactorily filed with the City.
B. Release of Liens or Claims
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until satisfactory evidence of
release of liens has been submitted to the City.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit all required documentation to City’s Project Representative.
01 77 19 - 2
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURE
A. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, submit:
1. Project Record Documents in accordance with Section 01 78 39
2. Operation and Maintenance Data, if required, in accordance with Section 01 78 23
B. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, perform final cleaning in accordance with Section
01 74 23.
C. Final Inspection
1. After final cleaning, provide notice to the City Project Representative that the Work
is completed.
a. The City will make an initial Final Inspection with the Contractor present.
b. Upon completion of this inspection, the City will notify the Contractor, in
writing within 10 business days, of any particulars in which this inspection
reveals that the Work is defective or incomplete.
2. Upon receiving written notice from the City, immediately undertake the Work
required to remedy deficiencies and complete the Work to the satisfaction of the
City.
3. Upon completion of Work associated with the items listed in the City's written
notice, inform the City, that the required Work has been completed. Upon receipt
of this notice, the City, in the presence of the Contractor, will make a subsequent
Final Inspection of the project.
4. Provide all special accessories required to place each item of equipment in full
operation. These special accessory items include, but are not limited to:
a. Specified spare parts
b. Adequate oil and grease as required for the first lubrication of the equipment
c. Initial fill up of all chemical tanks and fuel tanks
d. Light bulbs
e. Fuses
f. Vault keys
g. Handwheels
h. Other expendable items as required for initial start-up and operation of all
equipment
D. Notice of Project Completion
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 77 19 - 3
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 3
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1. Once the City Project Representative finds the Work subsequent to Final Inspection
to be satisfactory, the City will issue a Notice of Project Completion (Green Sheet).
E. Supporting Documentation
1. Coordinate with the City Project Representative to complete the following
additional forms:
a. Final Payment Request
b. Statement of Contract Time
c. Affidavit of Payment and Release of Liens
d. Consent of Surety to Final Payment
e. Pipe Report (if required)
f. Contractor’s Evaluation of City
g. Performance Evaluation of Contractor
F. Letter of Final Acceptance
1. Upon review and acceptance of Notice of Project Completion and Supporting
Documentation, in accordance with General Conditions, City will issue Letter of
Final Acceptance and release the Final Payment Request for payment.
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 78 23 - 1
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 1 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 78 23
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Product data and related information appropriate for City's maintenance and
operation of products furnished under Contract
2. Such products may include, but are not limited to:
a. Traffic Controllers
b. Irrigation Controllers (to be operated by the City)
c. Butterfly Valves
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Schedule
1. Submit manuals in final form to the City within 30 calendar days of product
shipment to the project site.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00. All submittals shall be
approved by the City prior to delivery.
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS
A. Submittal Form
1. Prepare data in form of an instructional manual for use by City personnel.
2. Format
a. Size: 8 ½ inches x 11 inches
b. Paper
1) 40 pound minimum, white, for typed pages
2) Holes reinforced with plastic, cloth or metal
c. Text: Manufacturer’s printed data, or neatly typewritten
01 78 23 - 2
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 1 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
d. Drawings
1) Provide reinforced punched binder tab, bind in with text
2) Reduce larger drawings and fold to size of text pages.
e. Provide fly-leaf for each separate product, or each piece of operating
equipment.
1) Provide typed description of product, and major component parts of
equipment.
2) Provide indexed tabs.
f. Cover
1) Identify each volume with typed or printed title "OPERATING AND
MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS".
2) List:
a) Title of Project
b) Identity of separate structure as applicable
c) Identity of general subject matter covered in the manual
3. Binders
a. Commercial quality 3-ring binders with durable and cleanable plastic covers
b. When multiple binders are used, correlate the data into related consistent
groupings.
4. If available, provide an electronic form of the O&M Manual.
B. Manual Content
1. Neatly typewritten table of contents for each volume, arranged in systematic order
a. Contractor, name of responsible principal, address and telephone number
b. A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume
c. List, with each product:
1) The name, address and telephone number of the subcontractor or installer
2) A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the
volume
3) Identify area of responsibility of each
4) Local source of supply for parts and replacement
d. Identify each product by product name and other identifying symbols as set
forth in Contract Documents.
2. Product Data
a. Include only those sheets which are pertinent to the specific product.
b. Annotate each sheet to:
1) Clearly identify specific product or part installed
2) Clearly identify data applicable to installation
3) Delete references to inapplicable information
3. Drawings
a. Supplement product data with drawings as necessary to clearly illustrate:
1) Relations of component parts of equipment and systems
2) Control and flow diagrams
b. Coordinate drawings with information in Project Record Documents to assure
correct illustration of completed installation.
c. Do not use Project Record Drawings as maintenance drawings.
4. Written text, as required to supplement product data for the particular installation:
a. Organize in consistent format under separate headings for different procedures.
b. Provide logical sequence of instructions of each procedure.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 78 23 - 3
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 3 of 5
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
5. Copy of each warranty, bond and service contract issued
a. Provide information sheet for City personnel giving:
1) Proper procedures in event of failure
2) Instances which might affect validity of warranties or bonds
C. Manual for Materials and Finishes
1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
2. Content, for architectural products, applied materials and finishes:
a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
1) Catalog number, size, composition
2) Color and texture designations
3) Information required for reordering special manufactured products
b. Instructions for care and maintenance
1) Manufacturer's recommendation for types of cleaning agents and methods
2) Cautions against cleaning agents and methods which are detrimental to
product
3) Recommended schedule for cleaning and maintenance
3. Content, for moisture protection and weather exposure products:
a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
1) Applicable standards
2) Chemical composition
3) Details of installation
b. Instructions for inspection, maintenance and repair
D. Manual for Equipment and Systems
1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
2. Content, for each unit of equipment and system, as appropriate:
a. Description of unit and component parts
1) Function, normal operating characteristics and limiting conditions
2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
b. Operating procedures
1) Start-up, break-in, routine and normal operating instructions
2) Regulation, control, stopping, shut-down and emergency instructions
3) Summer and winter operating instructions
4) Special operating instructions
c. Maintenance procedures
1) Routine operations
2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
4) Alignment, adjusting and checking
d. Servicing and lubrication schedule
1) List of lubricants required
e. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
f. Description of sequence of operation by control manufacturer
1) Predicted life of parts subject to wear
2) Items recommended to be stocked as spare parts
g. As installed control diagrams by controls manufacturer
h. Each contractor's coordination drawings
1) As installed color coded piping diagrams
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 78 23 - 4
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 4 of 5
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
i. Charts of valve tag numbers, with location and function of each valve
j. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
k. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
3. Content, for each electric and electronic system, as appropriate:
a. Description of system and component parts
1) Function, normal operating characteristics, and limiting conditions
2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
b. Circuit directories of panelboards
1) Electrical service
2) Controls
3) Communications
c. As installed color coded wiring diagrams
d. Operating procedures
1) Routine and normal operating instructions
2) Sequences required
3) Special operating instructions
e. Maintenance procedures
1) Routine operations
2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
4) Adjustment and checking
f. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
g. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
h. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
4. Prepare and include additional data when the need for such data becomes apparent
during instruction of City's personnel.
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Provide operation and maintenance data by personnel with the following criteria:
1. Trained and experienced in maintenance and operation of described products
2. Skilled as technical writer to the extent required to communicate essential data
3. Skilled as draftsman competent to prepare required drawings
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
01 78 23 - 5
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 5 of 5
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson 1.5.A.1 – title of section removed
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
01 78 39 - 1
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
SECTION 01 78 39
PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Work associated with the documenting the project and recording changes to project
documents, including:
a. Record Drawings
b. Water Meter Service Reports
c. Sanitary Sewer Service Reports
d. Large Water Meter Reports
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Prior to submitting a request for Final Inspection, deliver Project Record Documents to
City’s Project Representative.
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Accuracy of Records
1. Thoroughly coordinate changes within the Record Documents, making adequate
and proper entries on each page of Specifications and each sheet of Drawings and
other Documents where such entry is required to show the change properly.
2. Accuracy of records shall be such that future search for items shown in the Contract
Documents may rely reasonably on information obtained from the approved Project
Record Documents.
01 78 39 - 2
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
3. To facilitate accuracy of records, make entries within 24 hours after receipt of
information that the change has occurred.
4. Provide factual information regarding all aspects of the Work, both concealed and
visible, to enable future modification of the Work to proceed without lengthy and
expensive site measurement, investigation and examination.
1.10 STORAGE AND HANDLING
A. Storage and Handling Requirements
1. Maintain the job set of Record Documents completely protected from deterioration
and from loss and damage until completion of the Work and transfer of all recorded
data to the final Project Record Documents.
2. In the event of loss of recorded data, use means necessary to again secure the data
to the City's approval.
a. In such case, provide replacements to the standards originally required by the
Contract Documents.
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIED PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
2.2 RECORD DOCUMENTS
A. Job set
1. Promptly following receipt of the Notice to Proceed, secure from the City, at no
charge to the Contractor, 1 complete set of all Documents comprising the Contract.
B. Final Record Documents
1. At a time nearing the completion of the Work and prior to Final Inspection, provide
the City 1 complete set of all Final Record Drawings in the Contract.
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS
A. Maintenance of Job Set
1. Immediately upon receipt of the job set, identify each of the Documents with the
title, "RECORD DOCUMENTS - JOB SET".
01 78 39 - 3
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
2. Preservation
a. Considering the Contract completion time, the probable number of occasions
upon which the job set must be taken out for new entries and for examination,
and the conditions under which these activities will be performed, devise a
suitable method for protecting the job set.
b. Do not use the job set for any purpose except entry of new data and for review
by the City, until start of transfer of data to final Project Record Documents.
c. Maintain the job set at the site of work.
3. Coordination with Construction Survey
a. At a minimum clearly mark any deviations from Contract Documents
associated with installation of the infrastructure.
4. Making entries on Drawings
a. Record any deviations from Contract Documents.
b. Use an erasable colored pencil (not ink or indelible pencil), clearly describe the
change by graphic line and note as required.
c. Date all entries.
d. Call attention to the entry by a "cloud" drawn around the area or areas affected.
e. In the event of overlapping changes, use different colors for the overlapping
changes.
5. Conversion of schematic layouts
a. In some cases on the Drawings, arrangements of conduits, circuits, piping,
ducts, and similar items, are shown schematically and are not intended to
portray precise physical layout.
1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the
City's approval.
2) However, design of future modifications of the facility may require
accurate information as to the final physical layout of items which are
shown only schematically on the Drawings.
b. Show on the job set of Record Drawings, by dimension accurate to within 1
inch, the centerline of each run of items.
1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the
City's approval.
2) Show, by symbol or note, the vertical location of the Item ("under slab", "in
ceiling plenum", "exposed", and the like).
3) Make all identification sufficiently descriptive that it may be related
reliably to the Specifications.
c. The City may waive the requirements for conversion of schematic layouts
where, in the City's judgment, conversion serves no useful purpose. However,
do not rely upon waivers being issued except as specifically issued in writing
by the City.
B. Final Project Record Documents
1. Transfer of data to Drawings
a. Carefully transfer change data shown on the job set of Record Drawings to the
corresponding final documents, coordinating the changes as required.
b. Clearly indicate at each affected detail and other Drawing a full description of
changes made during construction, and the actual location of items.
c. Call attention to each entry by drawing a "cloud" around the area or areas
affected.
01 78 39 - 4
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised April 7, 2014
Wayfare Multifamily (Cibolo Hills Parkway)
City Project No. 103516
d. Make changes neatly, consistently and with the proper media to assure
longevity and clear reproduction.
2. Transfer of data to other Documents
a. If the Documents, other than Drawings, have been kept clean during progress of
the Work, and if entries thereon have been orderly to the approval of the City,
the job set of those Documents, other than Drawings, will be accepted as final
Record Documents.
b. If any such Document is not so approved by the City, secure a new copy of that
Document from the City at the City's usual charge for reproduction and
handling, and carefully transfer the change data to the new copy to the approval
of the City.
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
Peloton Job No. IMS20001
FRI December 07, 2021
G:\JOB\IMS20001_Chapel_Hill_MF\MasterDev\_Sur\Easements\Legals\IMS20001_EA6.docx Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
Description of a
Variable Width Water & Sewer Easement
BEING that certain tract of land situated in the J.A. Gill Survey, Abstract Number 570 and the B. Thomas
Survey, Abstract Number 1497, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of those tracts of land to
Chapel Hill West, LLC (a Limited Liability Company) a remainder of Tract 1 recorded in Instrument
Number D218219521 and Cibolo Hills recorded in Instrument Number D220187858 of the Deed Records
of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap stamped “PELOTON” found in the south right-of-way line of
Cibolo Hills Parkway and being the most southerly southeast corner of said Cibolo Hills Tract;
THENCE departing said south right-of-way line of said Cibolo Hills Tract over and across said Remainder
Tract 1 and said Cibolo Hills Tract the following bearings and distances:
With a curve to the left, an arc distance of 57.20 feet, through a central angle of 02° 58' 46",
having a radius of 1,100.00 feet, and a long chord which bears S 83° 28' 10" W, 57.19 feet;
N 06° 59' 19" W, 78.12 feet;
N 05° 39' 36" E, 184.22 feet;
N 16° 50' 24" W, 277.99 feet;
N 35° 53' 08" W, 239.76 feet;
N 88° 35' 47" E, 12.28 feet;
S 77° 53' 12" E, 29.37 feet to the west right-of-way line of Shoshoni Drive of said Cibolo Hills
Tract and being the beginning of a curve to the right;
THENCE following along the west right-of-way line of said Shoshoni Drive the following bearings and
distances:
With said curve to the right, an arc distance of 500.48 feet, through a central angle of 50° 18'
29", having a radius of 570.00 feet, and a long chord which bears S 27° 58' 20" E, 484.56 feet;
S 02° 49' 06" E, 22.75 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right;
With said curve to the right, an arc distance of 67.22 feet, through a central angle of 12° 50' 19",
having a radius of 300.00 feet, and a long chord which bears S 03° 36' 04" W, 67.08 feet to the
beginning of a curve to the left;
With said curve to the left, an arc distance of 68.20 feet, through a central angle of 13° 01' 30",
having a radius of 300.00 feet, and a long chord which bears S 03° 30' 28" W, 68.05 feet;
S 02° 49' 06" E, 68.59 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap stamped “PELOTON” found;
THENCE S 05° 03' 04" E, 54.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 43,284 square feet or
0.994 acres more or less.
�
��
�
�
v�
�
a
z
0
�
�
�
a�
ro
�asis of Bearing is the 7exas Coordinate
System, North Centrol Zone �202, NAD 83
"integrai parts oF this document"
1. �escription
2, Exhibit �
L�G�ND: , NE38`3547"E
IRFAIRON ROD FbUND i2.ZF3'
, 2 X ������0
/ ���.
�pQ'�' f�
� �, ��,rC�
s
���
\�
1X
����s�\i5'j �!�
2 s Qo s f
8• �•
�'o :��� `,•4.
c�` soa
g�.
\ � �C�•
.s�
N16°50'24"�V
277.99'
` ���P�GioE���
' e�� �,Q �yN �
Cf{�}�Z'�'••. �:`j ,
• � . 5 S T�p�'��N �AI1RS� Y
,�T';a,po�� �.fBsP\' '''
��S5S1o1
•.,...,. �•'��
�rzv��
n
0
�
�
0
�
�
sD
R
G
O
�
�
U]
0
�
0
�
n
0.994 ACRES
43,284 SQUARE FEET
31
�J---��_v (/,—.�f`1
t�"
�I /� � r % y�
(./�`�- r.z,� � � v�
�
S77°53' 12"E
29.37'
'G
`��s,
�� s�.
CIE30L0 HILLS `� ��,
INST. NO. D220187858 6`" �i
D.R.T.C.T
�1PPROXIMAT� SURV�Y LINE
REMAlNDEft OF TRAGT 1
CHAP�L HILL WEST, �LG ��� °
I�lS7. �l0. D218219521 g ��C� ��q`�
D.R.T.C.T , ��.
�l " OC`!1 �� �
��
�:� � E L�T'� N
�� � I` L A N Q S O L U T I O N 5
11Cu0 FRISCP ST. SU17E dM
FRISCO, T.0 75033 dE9-217-I£00
polv�� or
' n=2°5�'A6' �
a• . �,�° p � S�GINNING
d
4p � R= i i oo.00' �=5�.zo' �XH I S! T B
CH=S�3°28' 10"V! 57.19'
VARIABLL WIDITH
WATER 8c SEWER EASEMENT
B. THOhhAS SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1497 /1Nf�
J.A G1LL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NQ. 570
TARRANT COUNTY, �fEXAS
JOB #; IM520001 Dt3AWN BY: M1Yd5T CH�CKED BY: SRAhISEY �ATE: 1 SI1012621 pAGE #: 2 OF 2
1X
w
cn •
^� N
�
r7 �t
�N
a ��
z
�7
N
�
tiv = -�- E
S' �
�
o so �o�
GE7FS���C SCALE I�� FEET
/ Ue�
��,i
������
� ��
f
O
�� .
1 � 1 1
Z'�l
16X
S02°49'06"E
22. 7 5'
� � }
ci= 1 2°50' � 9"
R=300.00' L�67.22'
CF3=S3'36'04"�V 67,08'
� I
> ��13°01'30„
�R-3Q0.00' L—S8.20'
CN=53'30'2B"�N 68.05'
4
SQ2'49'06"E
%�6�3.59�
� _�
s/a • rrtF
F�rEzororJ'
SOS°Q3'C�4"E 54.9�3'
Cilat�la IIillS �'�u'lc�v��5�
5/8 � !RF
'.PELOTp,'1'
NQB°59't �"V,!
7 F3.1 ?_'
Peloton Job No. IMS20001
FRI December 07, 2021
G:\JOB\IMS20001_Chapel_Hill_MF\MasterDev\_Sur\Easements\Legals\IMS20001_EA7.docx Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
Description of a
55’ Drainage Easement
BEING that certain tract of land situated in the J.A. Gill Survey, Abstract Number 570, Tarrant County,
Texas and being a portion of that tract of land to Chapel Hill West, LLC (a Limited Liability Company) a
remainder of Tract 1 recorded in Instrument Number D218219521 of the Deed Records of Tarrant
County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap stamped “PELOTON” found in the south right-of-way line
of a tract of land to Cibolo Hills recorded in Instrument Number D220187858 of said County Records;
THENCE N 47° 40' 27" E, 41.15 feet from which a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap stamped “PELOTON” found
bears N 47° 40' 27" E, 208.83 feet;
THENCE departing said south right-of-way line of said Cibolo Hills Tract over and across said Remainder
Tract 1 the following bearings and distances:
S 42° 19' 33" E, 55.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
N 47° 40' 27" E, 182.99 feet;
S 42° 19' 33" E, 55.00 feet;
S 47° 40' 27" W, 182.99 feet;
THENCE N 42° 19' 33" W, 55.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 10,065 square feet or
0.231 acres more or less.
�
�
m
�
�,
�
z
0
0
rn
�
a
rn
�b
Basis oF Bearing is the Texas Coordinate
System, North Central Zone 4202, NAD �i3
"Integral parts of this document"
1, ❑escripiion
2. Exhibit
LEGEND�
1RF=IRON ROD FOUN�
R�1v1AINDER 0� �RACT 1
CHAPEL FtILL WEST, LLC
If�IS7, f�10. D2182i 9521
D.R.7.0 '�
CIBOLd HILLS
�NST. N0. D2201i37f
D.R.T.C.T
in
/�`
��
�
.
I
�,�
�
N
vv =- -- �
S
D 25 50
/ GRr�PH'C SC:LE IN FEET
�
5/8" 1RF
'"PEL4TON'�
0.231 ACRES
r10,065 SQUARE F�ET
s��e
,ss'9,
\°' ��`
a�
POTNT OF
CONIMENCING s�
i ���w ,ss'�
o �
.5/8" !RF ��'1 �,`'�h ��' tn
`PEL 0 70�V "" �
� POINT OI'
B�C�INNINCT ����
ss o ��L
G
� RENIAIN�Eft �F TRACT 1
p� CFiAPEL HILL WEST, LLC
�� INST. N�. D21g21957_l
I�, D,R,T,C,T
r',� � � L.���� 1 W
�� I1 I L A N b S 4 L U T 1 O N S
>>aco FRisco sr. suire <oa
�RISCa,T%7�n3; 4c9-213-If40
�Q�� � �O
� �� e ����
�p�
��
���`
, �\ �
�� 9
�°�1 �Q �������
� a
f . O4= .I"� � �
��� .,,..,,,..,�',q
� �P � ��� ��� �� �
�� r' �-�` '• .,. �
, • � µ�� R J�S `5E`� U
cF���Ft���s s .. ..... ./�
� . " �fl �l i� �,��: e- ("
`` ''••,�o��;s��,��0 � �`
��.����i���� C�%�i ,�,,
_ --:��t � ,� �
C `�I
EXHIBIT B
55' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
J.A. GILL SURVEY, AE3 3TRACT NU. 5/0
TARR�INT COUNTY, TEK�iS
�
�h �
�
,�0�"1�
��
�
e1
Peloton Job No. IMS20001
FRI December 07, 2021
G:\JOB\IMS20001_Chapel_Hill_MF\MasterDev\_Sur\Easements\Legals\IMS20001_EA8.docx Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
Description of a
Variable Width Drainage Easement
BEING that certain tract of land situated in the B. Thomas Survey, Abstract Number 1497, Tarrant
County, Texas and being a portion of that tract of land to Chapel Hill West, LLC (a Limited Liability
Company) a remainder of Tract 1 recorded in Instrument Number D218219521 of the Deed Records of
Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap stamped “PELOTON” found in the south right-of-way line of
Cibolo Hills Parkway and being the most southerly southeast corner of Cibolo Hills recorded in
Instrument Number D220187858 of said County Records;
THENCE departing said south right-of-way line of said Cibolo Hills Tract over and across said Remainder
Tract 1 the following bearings and distances:
With said curve to the left, an arc distance of 333.52 feet, through a central angle of 17° 22' 20",
having a radius of 1,100.00 feet, and a long chord which bears S 76° 16' 22" W, 332.25 feet to a
point of intersection with a non-tangential line.
N 00° 19' 48" W, 59.12 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right
With said curve to the right, an arc distance of 9.89 feet, through a central angle of 00° 29' 27",
having a radius of 1,155.00 feet, and a long chord which bears N 68° 56' 05" E, 9.89 feet;
N 18° 19' 17" W, 29.96 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right;
With said curve to the right, an arc distance of 50.54 feet, through a central angle of 02° 26' 38",
having a radius of 1,185.00 feet, and a long chord which bears N 70° 27' 24" E, 50.54 feet;
S 18° 19' 17" E, 29.94 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right;
With said curve to the right, an arc distance of 267.52 feet, through a central angle of 13° 16'
15", having a radius of 1,155.00 feet, and a long chord which bears N 78° 19' 23" E, 266.92 feet
to a 5/8 inch iron rod with cap stamped “PELOTON” found in the west right-of-way line of
Shoshoni Drive of said Cibolo Hills Tract;
THENCE S 05° 03' 04" E, 55.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING containing 19,703 square feet or 0.452
acres more or less.
@
�
m
r
�n
„
�
z
0
0
�
A
O
�4��1 a • ,:� � `\
� Ac ;��''�� d, � �y '�c�'�m
C�y:o ��-":�, `�;U
'.0 ', ` � ;' � ��� ,' �
C o� ' � , o� ,,'y
••ti ''+%
��: �. � ��<Z
� , t f . _
�
� �
-� �
1 �
� �
�
n
�
�
N
�
�
�
a
0
0
�
r
Q
[n
0
o'
�
�
�
��
�o
�D O
� � � �
��n� nD
�
��� �
� mD—
�m-<�D �
a�nmm z
r
� �
za�o� fT1�
��n�� �
� � � � �
f *�i C7 � rn [� CO
��0�2
o z
EJ� � '�
v �
o �
n
z
0
z
0
0
��
w �'
. �
N �
c-�
��
�
� Q 14
�
o'� o �'
N; � N
���a:
c,� �
iji �
�
T �
z II
o� �
�4 u,
(J� (f�
rn
0 0 '> Z
u� II �
0
rf' U � � cD
���
a,�n� •`flv
coco� ��
�
�o
o�
� �
� N
C �
D
�1 �?
�m
m�
m
�
v� N �`� �
.t� , �;
0
i+
�����
2� y�,
,� �' b� '_d
�� �'� L� O
�) � � �
. ��� � y
c: r � �
�� �
�� P E L�T� N
��I�� �Ar�n so�uriar�s
11PP] FPo5C0 Si, $VITE 400
PR�SCO, TX 750's3 dEP-213�I8UP
LYG 7 !!E '�\J] i;"SLUp f_!'HPY�LF'�U__�. �\
� \
��
C � � � :
� = n �_
U7�� z�
���
�I �
�z��
� � � �
�31v� �,
. �
� [)J j�
��7 (n �
�O - � D
� n
N �-� �
n �
�
�
E--+
O
�
�--1
i�
�
�
�
�
�
�
� ���
I � N
� � N
�
1 �o�,f
N (n J 4? �
� I
�° N r
k � � �
V �, � I
o�
m �� �
� �
�
�
O
X
��
�
�
� m
�
C
�
C
�
r
Iz
f� I
c�
x�
7 �,
~s ,� v
� 14
�.o.w
4V3 r 6?
� 4N �:
N �
J
� �
� s�,
N_
�„ �
C1� O
a �n
0 0
- c,,
0
�
rri
JOB #: IMS20001 �CiF2AWN BY: MYOST
U
��
oa
z '�
I!
� �
a�t�Q
i iLiOL�SOT��'
�
7
�
�
Z �
CJO�
� �
.�QO
N
C� �v =
— i � r
� �
��
�
U�
C?�
n � � `�
�
�
n
� � b � _f '� �
X � Z =
� �
I �� r�
,; o
D BY: SRAMSEY �DATE: 11l1012D21 I PAGE fk: 2 OF 2
� � �n
� �,
O
� r N� � = Ln CO
� rst � � n
� c� v� v,
m � � �.
� z r� o �a
—� � � x (D n � Q
Z ]- � �.
X � �T��v �m
a rt �• o o �
C_�a � '� `'- � �
o c� �
� � � o � �.
O � �
Z rr n (n
Q 3 �
I� � S
� �
Q. �
� o o -�
c Coj � � n � ro
� �o x
� � o
� � � .� �
�� �� n- N c7
� - o
C��� D n.
�� � o
� �, �
�� � �
�
� R�I
ENGFIVE
GE�TECHNIGAL ENGINEERING REP�RT
CHAPEL HILLS MULTIFAMILY
CI60L� HILLS PARKWAY
FQRT W�RTH, TExAS
Prepared For.
IM5 De�elopment
569a Watermelon Road, Suite 4�Q
Northpart, Alahama 354T3
Attn: Mr. Keith Jones
February 2a2'I
PROJECT N�. �1-Z4892
www.ro�ee n p i n eers. com
R�IVE
E N G I NE EFtING
February 22, za� �
Mr. Keith Janes
IM5 Development
5690 Watermelon Raad, 5�ite 4�0
Northpa�t, Alabama 35473
Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report
Chapel Hill Multifamily
Fort Worth, Texas
Rane Report No. 27-24892
Dear Mr. Jvnes:
��.� E r���1
,� .... �
r
i y:' ••� • �'.9�'��
ra; ;t�`
'�: :*
............................. �
EFtIC M. NOl�LABAUGH��
........................... `
y:� 120828 :'�i
��p'�F' �: �E'NSEa: ��'�
+���S�oNA� �E�� �.�-
Rone Engineering 5ervices, Ltd. {Rone� is pleased ta suhmit the Finai Geotechnical Engineering
Report for the ataa�e referenced project. The geatechnical engineering services performed far
this study were �arried out i� general accordance with Rone Prapasal No. P-301 ad-21, dated
January 8, 2021.
This repvrt presents engineerin� analyses and recommendations for site grading, four�dati�ns,
and pavements with respect tv knQwn project and site charac#eristics. Detailed results of our field
exploration and tabvratory testing are pro�ided in the appendix af the repart.
We appre�iate the appor#unity tv be af service #o yau on this proje�t. We look forward to praviding
additianal Geatechnical Engineerir�g and Canstruction Materials Testing 5@NlCES �5 tFiB project
progresses through the final design and canstruc#ian phases. Please contact us if you ha�e any
questions or if we car� be af further assistance.
RespectFully submitted, _���`���•�y�
. �
Eric M. Hollabaugh, P.E. ���i.����! �.��
5enior Geotechnical Engineer ����
Texas Enginaering Firm License No. F-1572
GEO7ECHNICAL EIJGIN�ERIlJG
EARTHW�RKS C4NTftOt
ENVIROHMENTAL CONSLJLTING
CflNSTRlfCTf�N MAT�FtIAL TESTING
Mark D. Gray� P.
Partner �
n,a,..RAs ��o�T waR-�r� � Al1STEN � Hausrar�
3201 NE L�pp $2d, 5111TE i 8� � F4RT WpRTFi, TEXAS 76137 � TE�: 817.717.1 Q40
PAGE
1 PR�JECT INF�RMATION ......................................................................................................1
2 PURP�SES ANO SCOPE ❑F 5TU1]Y ....................................................................................'E
3 FIEL❑ EXPLaRATI�N AND LA6�RAT�RY TESTIN� .........................................................2
4 GENERAL 51TE C�NDITIDNS ...............................................................................................2
4.1 Site Geology ........................................................................................................................
...............
4.2 Subsurface 5ail Conditions .................................................................................................................3
4.3 Groundwater .......................................................................................................................................7
5 ANALYSIS aF SITE AND F�IiNDATIDN ALTERNATIVES ...................................................T
5.1 Geotechnical Analysis ........................................................................................................................7
5.2 Subsurface Volume Change Potenttal ................................................................................................9
5.3 Seismic Site Cfass ............................................................................................................................10
6 F�l1NDATI�N SYSTEM RECDMMENI7ATI�NS .................................................................1'I
6.1 Ground Modificatian and 5ufograde 7reatment ................................................................................'i 1
fi.1.1 5ubgrade Recornpaction ................................................................... �., .............................12
6.1.2 Exca�atior� Safety Consideraiions .......... . .............................................................................12
6.2 Foundation 5tructure ........................................................................................................................12
7 51TE PREPARATlQN FOR C�NSTRIlCTiON ......................................................................12
7.1 General .............................................................................................................................................12
7.2 Exisfing Grades ................................................................................................................................12
7.3 Ex�avatians .......................................................................................................................................13
8 CaNSTRUCTI�N ❑F SUBGRA!]E FILLS ............................................................................13
8.1 5ubgrade Preparation .......................................................................................................................14
8.2 Subgrade Fill Constructian ...............................................................................................................14
$.2.1 Pr��ecf Fills ................................................................................................................................ 14
8.2.2 Fill Material Requirements .........................................................................................................'{5
8.2.3 Borrow 5electian .......................................................................................................................15
8.3 Fill Canstruction Specifi�ations .........................................................................................................15
8.3.1 Recompaction of Existing Subgrade and Grade Raise BeEow Buildings ..................................16
8.3.2 Utility Trench Backfill .................................................................................................................2a
8.3.3 Gerteral Site Fills for Site �rading anci Drainage ......................................................................23
8.3.4 Compaction 5pe�ifi�ation Surrtmary .........................................................................................23
8.4 Quality Control and Field Verification TestiRg ..................................................................................23
8.5 Constructian ��ersight .....................................................................................................................24
9 BlJILDING F011NDATI�N 5TRlJCTURE ..............................................................................�5
9.1 Slab Foundations ..............................................................................................................................25
14 PAVEMENT .........................................................................................................................26
1�.1 Pavemen# 5ubgrade Preparation ...................................................................................................28
10.2 5urface Drainage ............................................................................................................................29
11 51TE COMPLETi�N AND MAINTENANCE ................... .....................................................29
11.1 5iie Grading and Drainage .............................................................................................................29
11.2 Landscaping and Irrigation .............................................................................................................30
12 5T110Y CL�SL]RE ..............................................................................................................3�
13 CDPYRIGHT 2029 R�NE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LT� . .............................................31
,a���N�aix A
Plate
VICINiTYMAP ........................................................................................................................................................... A.1
GE�LDGY MAP ........................................................................................................................................................ A.2
B�R1NG L�CATI�N QIAGRAM ................................................................................................................................ A.3
PVR Z�iJING DIAGRAM ......................................................................................................................................... A.3a
LDGS aF B(7RING ............................................................................................. . . . ........A.4-A.33
. . ................................. .
KEY TD CLASSIFICATIQNS ANQ SYMBOLS ........................................................................................................ A.34
UNIFIED S�IL CLASSIFICATIdN 5Y57EM ........................................................................................................... A.35
SWELLTEST RE5U�T5 ......................................................................................................................................... A.36
ATTERBERGLIMITS PL�T .................................................................................................................................... A.37
REC C�MPACTlON ❑ESIGN REPORTS ............................................................................................... A.38a ta A.38e
APP�AiDi� 6
Paqe
FIELD�PERATIDNS ................................................,............................................................................................... 8.1
LABORAT�RY �ESTING .......................................................................................................................................... 8.2
APP�NE]I]C C
Paale
IMPORTANT INF�RMATI�N A6�LJT T{iIS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEE�2ING REPQRT ...................................... C.1
R�IV�
GE�TECHNICAL ENGINEERING REP�RT
'I PR�JECT INFDRMATIQN
The subject prvperty is c�mprised of approximately 4a acres of generally vacan# land la�ated in
narth Fort Worth, Texas. A tabular surrimary af the praposed project is provided helow:
Table 1: Prvj�ct D�erview
Item
�escription
Locati�n � The site is located immediately sauth af Cib�io Hills Parkway, appr�ximately'/2 mile west
of its intersection with L15 Highway 287 (North Saginaw 8oulevard} in Fort Warth, Texas.
The project wil� in�lude cvnstru�tion of an apartment Gomm�nity �onsisting of a tqtal af
Fro;ec# 52 four- and six-unit residential structures, an officelamenity cen#er, a swimming pool,
aescription and associated pa�ed parking and dri�e areas. The project will also include canstructian
of the vortion of Cibol❑ Hills Parkway located immediately narth of the prvject site.
�xisting Sit�
Conditions
The site is generaily lo�ated on a slight ridge sloping dawnward to the narth, west, and
3'npography south, with ele�ations ranging from approximately 822 to 780 feet. Grading plans
indica#e up to approximately 2#eet af cut and till wiil be required to achiev�e final grades.
Site �i�inity and geology maps are attached as Plates A.1 and A.2, respecti�ely in Appendix A caf
this report. Baring Iocatians are shown on the Boring Lo�ation �jagram, Plate A.3.
2 PURPOSES AND SC�PE DF STLJDY
The principal purpose of #his study is e�aluatian af site subsurFa�e �anditions to pro�ide
geotechnical recommendativns for the design and �onstruction af foundations and pa�ements for
the praposed structures. The study was canducted in the fallowing phases:
. Borings were drilled and sampled to evaluate the subsurFace conditions at the boring iocations and
to ob#ain sail sampkes.
. Laboratary fests were conducted an limited samples reco�ered fram the barings to e�aluate the
pertinent engineering characteristi�s of the faundatian materials.
• Engineering analyses were �onducted for foundation and pa�ement destgn recommendatians.
• Onsite soils were e�aluated for potentia! sources af fill materials required for the project.
As the Geotechnical Engineer of Record serving this project, w� recammend that Rone �ra�ide
assistan�e during the design phase ta �vnfirm the intent of the geatechnical recommendativns
The praperty is ger�erally open and covered with grass. Based an Google Earth°
hisiorical irnagery, the site has consisted of ur�de�elope�f pasture since at least 1995. A
series of qas welis was installed immed+ately southeast of the site in late 2QQ2.
Chapel HEII Muitifamily
R�N��..,,
has been satisfied. In additivrr, Rone Earthwarks shvufd be retained to observe fil! �anstru�tion
and ensure the specified cvntrals are correctty implementad.
3 FIELD ExPLDRATI�N AND LABDRATDRY TESTING
The t�oring locatians were identi#ied in the field hy Rane Engineering personnel using sita
iandmarks, maps, aerial phatagraphs, and a hanciheld GP5 de�ice. The taarings were nat located
by a r�gistered surveyor. The locaiions pra�ided are far general mapping purposes and are
accurate anly ta the extent implied by the technique used in their determinativn.
A total of 30 borings were completed to depths �f appraximately 20 feet belaw exis#ing grades
using a truck-mounted drj{f rig in January 2021. The appraxirnate boring locations are sh�wrt on
Plate A.3, 8oring Location Diagram. Sample depth, description vf soils, and classificatian �based
an the lJnified Soil Classificativn System} are presented in the Lvgs of Boring, Plates A.4 through
A.33. Keys to terms and symbols used an the lags are als❑ included in Apper�dix A.
Laboratory tests were perFarmed ❑n selected samples re�overed �ram the borings to canfirm
visual �lassificatian, determine material strata, and estimate in-situ c�nsolidation states and other
engineering properties af the �-naterials encauntered. Un�onfined compressi�n tests, soluble
sulfa#e con�entration tests, and classificatian test results are pr�sented in tfi�e Logs of 6oring. I�
atfditivn, ane-d4mensivnal swel! and swell pressure tests were perFormed on selected samples
reca�ered from vari�us depths. Descriptior�s af the procedures used in the field and IabQratory
phases of this stuciy are presenled in Appendix B.
4 GENERAL SITE C�NI]ITIQNS
4.1 5ite Gevlagy
Based an the subsurface canditians encauntered at �he baring locations and the Geofogic At�as
af Texas, Dallas Sheet (putalished by the Bureau of Economi� Geolagy�, the site appears to be
lacated within the undi�ide�S Farth Worth Limestane and ❑u�k Creek formatipr� (mapped as Kfd}
The L15GS Mineral Resources On-Line 5patial ❑ata reference �antains #I�e fallawing description:
Chapel Hill Ii/IulYifamily
RflNE J
...,,�
The Fart Warth Limestvne farmation generally cansists of limestane and clay. The limestane is
typically aphanitic (very f�ne-grained} to biasparite and burrvwed, and t#�e clay is cal�areaus,
forming Iaw ra�ling hills. The ❑uck Creek Limestane formation typicaily cansists of limestone and
marl, with medium, nodular- to wa�y-bedded limestane. The gealogi� mapping was originaily
perfarmed using aerial ph�tography. Lacal �ariatians and anomalies generally occur when using
aerial imagery.
4.2 5uk�surface 5oii Contiitians
The results of the field and laboratary testing ha�e been used to develap generalized subsurface
pra�iles af the project site. The strata identified in the k�orings at this si#e are des�ribed belvw:
• Straturr� !- The upper stratum generally cansisted of brown, dark brown, anc! tan fat clay (CH) and
lean clay �CL) �ontaining various amaunts of sand, calcarevus nodules, and gra�el from the ground
surface to depths of approximately 1'/x to 18 feet.
■ Stratum II - The second stratum generally �onsisted af tan or gray wea#hered limestone andlar
limestone sxtending ta the termination depths of approximateEy 20 feet.
Hand peneErameter readings ranged fram 2.75 ta more than 4.5 tans per square #vat (tsf) in the
cohesive soils. Un�onfined campression strengths in the tested cahesi�e materiais ranged from
appraximately 3,8�� tQ 19,7�fl pvunds per square fvot �psf}.
In-situ moisture levels in Stratum I ranged from a�proximately 3 percent abo�e to 17 percent
below fheir measured plastic limits, anti a�eraged appraximately 7'/z percent belaw, indicating
generally dry soil conditians. A#abular summary of the properties of the upper clay strata
cansidered for design is prauicied belaw.
Table 2: Genera4ized 5ubsurFace Profile
In Situ Soil Property I Stratum !
Depih {ieety I 1'/2 to 18
Descriptian ` Fat Clay and Lean Clay
Estimated Specific Gra�ity, GS � 2.7Q
Percent Fines {°/o] I 18-98 {74}
Lic}uid Limit - I 27-92 {55}
Plasticity index I 12-55 �3�)
Dry Densi#y {pcfj � 76-124 {97}
RQN�. .,�
ln 5itu Sail Praperfy
Void Rati�, e
Mois#ure Cuntent �°Io)
Moisture Content Increase Pv#ential (°Iej
Stratum I
a.6a-�.d3 {0.78}
3-39 �17J
3to11
While both I�an clay and fat clay shrink and swell with variations in mvisture �ontent, higher
plasticity materials �fat clays} typically f�ave greater sensiti�ity to m�isture �arsation, increased
potential for �olume change, and higher swell pressures. A swell pressure test perFormed on a
specimen of the fat clay recvvered fram Stratum I indicated a sweli pressure in excess af 8,aQ�
psf; hvwe�er, with sufFicient maisture in�rease, swell pressures within 5tratum I are generally
expected to range from approximately 3,Qaa to 6,0��3 psf. Modification af the upper soils within
Stratum I will controi subgrade and faundatian design re�ommendatiQns. The existing moisture
cantent ir�crease potential within Stratum I was determined ta range fr�m approximately 3 to 11
percent. A generalized profile af t1�e subsurface canditions is inclutied �elow.
Chapel Hiil Multifamily
z �
� �
m
m
x �
�m
Elevation {Feet}
� � � o � � � � � �
C31 Q [h Q [1'[ Q (J� � CT O
� r
,�; � E I
_ �
N
W � W I`C]
W W � .
�i�il�����������`�� � .
1:1:1:I:I��i�������i.� �
I:I:l:l:i�i�����i����. ".�►` •:
�I:I:I:I:I:�i���i��`�'� �.
�
0
� n
�
TI � � T
�C � � �
C Q = (�
O D -
��-a
�_�,
(p N ' Z
�
�
N v � �
� �.
�
�
�
m
a
m
�
r
N
m
0
�
C
�
N
�
�
�'I
a
c�
m
�
�
❑
m
r
m
ICI:I:I:1:►\.��
0
v�
��
�
ro
�
❑
7
[p
�
❑7 �
� t
[b �
�
�
�
m
m
�i�i�i��� �'�u� "
���� '"����� :.
�
I
� �I
1 w y � � �� I
�
o � : �
o �
. � I� : �
�
0
�
�
a
fXl
f0
N
O
3
�
�
@
�
� �
r �
3 �
� n
�
o v
3 `¢
m
� �
Gl C] �
m � m
¢ ro 3
�° '� C7
�
�
� 3 � m
�� � p Q
,�,. - N
N � 7 � �
s� �
� a N � N
�
� � �
4 ;\ w I
o m � �-� I
� I :
�
A � Ir
� � ��:
� N �
0
o co wm �� I
V �1 �I �J �I V �1
[�J� O C~YI Q f�3� 4 C�71
�
4
U�
�
6
m
v
.�-r
T
��
z�
m �� �
2 � Gl
�
0
� �
�
�
� n ro =
��=m
❑ o --
� o - po
3 y � �
�
�- �
% N �• O
Ri N � 3
F �.
�
�
�
�
m
z
m
�
r
N
m
v
N
�
W
�
�
�
�
n
m
�x
0
�
�
m
� �
� {7 G']
S11 �
n '� a
m
m —
�c `�
�
�
� �
� r c�
= N �
� o m
� m �
Q
Ele�ation {Feet)
�1 W O~0 [p � O p � LD
Lh O C3'I 4 CJI 4 (P O G�
0
�
v
�
n
m
n
v
�
cn
W
�
N
[�
7
�
„
m
�
�
�i�i�i�i�i���i�������►°ti �.
.
i����'�����������������..
i�i�i�i�i�iti���������„
i�i�i�i�i'i������� "
.
l:l:l:l:l:l:��i��i��i��r�� � �
.
1:1:1:1:1:1:1:!�i��i�.\f► "
k�1�1�1�1� � `� ��
.
���i��i�� �' ►.\\ .�
�
��������; ►� �\ ..
�� ���
���
Q
c� r� � � ,_ � N
�°`�' m o ro C° o
m � N � 2
� � � ,� a c�r, o c°'r�
�
�
0
�
0
�
Q
�,
�
v
P
�
i
�
N
N
6/ � N •��
� '
�
�
. . � - „i � [�.� � I�
ii�i�iti�i��r�������►��i► "
�il�l��������� `.��� �
1 ,
� w cn e� cA m
V�i 6 U�i Q (Sz d
�
�
ro
�
f�
N
M
r
R�N�
The Lags a# Boring shauld be reviewed for specific ir�farmat�an at indi�idua� boring locations.
5tratificati�n boundaries shown in the logs represent the approximate locaiians of changes in
types of in-situ materials. The transitian hetween material types may vary between barings, and
be gradual and indistinct. Variafions will occur ar�d s�auld be expected a�ross the site.
4.3 Graundwater
The borings were ad�anced using continuous #light augers. The harings were mvnitared during
and immediately after drilling #or the presence of water seepage. Free water was not ❑k�served
En the borings during vr immediately follawing drilling. A tharough assessm�nt of the �adose zvne
ar upper groundwater was not conducted, and the study did nat include extended mvnitaring of
groundwater levels or Perched water canditivns. A full hydro-geologic siudy �an be �onducted
upan request ta assess the saur�es and variation of in-situ moisture levels in the variose zone
water levels beneath the site, and haw variaus site de�elapment alterna#ives coukd pvtentially
efFect grour�dwater canditions.
In general, grvundwater levels and moisture content in the vadose zane vary clir�atically and
seasonally depending on topography, land usage, surFace hydrology, subsurface hydragealagy,
and proximity to bodies of surFa�e water. The rate and extent of these variations depend on many
variables including subsurtace stratigra�hy, svil sirata pro�erties, capiiiary S�UiC�S, �apillary
strength, cansalidation states, soil struct�re, thermal co�er, and surFace infiltration and
evapatrans�iration rates. A cursory hydro-geakagi� assessment �f th� vadose zone is pra�ided
in 5ection 5.1 Geatechnicaf Analysis.
5 ANALYSlS OF 51TE AND FnUNDATI�N ALTERNATIVES
�aundation alternati�es have k�een e�afua#ed on a lev�l t�ased on site-specific geatechnical
canditions, proposed de�e€apment plans, and knawn design preferences.
5.1 Geotechnical Analysis
5ubgrade preparatian and faundatian fill elements are critical camponents of ail foundation
systems. Faundation alternaiives for the prapased buiidings ha�e been evaluated based a� the
following engineering criteria:
Chapel Hill Multifamily
R�N�..,. .� �
• Bearing �apacity
• Settlemeni potential
• Vaiume change (shrink-swell} po#ential
The rate and magnitude af �alume �hange is controlled by the rate and exfer�f af wetting and
drying cycles. Valume change patential is affected by maisture change potential, clay mineralagy,
material der�sity, soil structure, hydro-geologic en�irvnment, anr� confining pressure ta swell
pressure ratios. Moisture change potential, material d�nsity, and sail stru�ture can be modif+ed
and cantrolfed; and cfay content, hydro-geologic en�ironment and confining pressure �an be
managed ta limit volume change as necessary for each founda#ian alternative. These are key
factars in the ground modificatian elemer�ts of foundation aiternatives when evaivating �arious
foundation designs. The primary provisions fvr managing the hydro-gealagi� en�ironment are
I�ng-term stabilization of subgrade maisture Eevels, and marsagement of desiccation ris#c.
A limited hydro-gealogic assessment of the vadvse zone indi�ates the primary source of
suk�surface moisture is likely surtace water ir�filtrati�n. There is generally sufficient clay within the
encauntered soils ta allow capiilary rise fram any permanent groundwater tv heip maintain
equilEbrium soil maisture le�els; however, granular soil can break the capillary actian and reduce
the oppartu�ity for continuous moisture supply from a sustained water sour�e at depth. The site
is generally unde�elaped and relatively open. SurFace water starage is negligible, and there is
li#t!e thermal co�er. Surtace grades sl�a�e downward to the north and west, a�d the underlying
bedrock gradient is expected to be generalky similar.
Founda#ion 5]15tEf1'15 Dft�l� require ground mvdification within the vadose zane. Each ground
modification eiement includes provisions for limiting moisture content �ariatian, and pr�paring for
its effects. The following ground modification elements were evaluated far slah foundations:
• Need and extent of subgrade replacement 1 re-compaction fill,
• Management and tolerance af in-situ conditians belaw gr�und modification depths,
. Grade raise elements,
• Strength and stability requirements of each foundation fill element; and,
• 5ubgrade stabilization options.
Analyses af �alume change and settlement potentia[ relati�e to the �ariaus foundation alternati�es
are summarized in the follawing sections.
��
R�N�E/
.. ,��.:f
5.2 Subsurface Volume Change Pvtential
❑irect measurement vf s�il expansion and the resulting swell pressures under the anticipated
stress conditions is the most reliable way to accvunt for the factors that cantrol volume change
within natural clay farmations and assess swell-shrink conditions withir� the vadose zone. These
analyses indirectiy account far clay mineralagy, clay content, clay mix, soii structure, compaGtion
states, and stress states. Measureme�t af swell pressures allows determination of graund
mvdification requirements �ar foundatian system �esign. For this study, a limited assessment �f
swell potential and resulting swell pressures was conducted on samples reco�ered from muftiple
cfepths. Swell test resul#s are summarized in the tabfe below:
Table 3: Swell Test Details
Moisture (olaj
lasticity Percent
Index Fines Initial Final
Boring �epth Load
tfQQt� ��5+�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
375
10d0
375
125
1125
125
125
125
125
313
125
375
1�5
875
375
125
875
125
125
fi25
125
125
45 95
4� 54
25 fi1
20 i4
25
30
42
38
25
44
47
44
24
23
47
31
22
32
24
54
za
2fi.4
31.3
15.fi
21.d
21.9
21.1
15.8
33.0
25.3
27.4
27.5
21.3
31.3
21.$
1 fi.3
32.9
22.4
19.5
23.$
16.1
33.5
17.3
31.5
34.2
22.3
25.1
24.9
25.8
23.5
38.0
29.8
31.5
31.7
32.2
34.6
25.8
19.8
37.7
26.1
23.3
29.8
24.a
37.7
23.9
�
m
m
:�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
�
Increase {ncrease
Fotentiai
5.2 +5.5
�.9 +3.2
g.g +7.0
4.1 +4.3
3.'f +3.3
4.7 +5.0
7.9 +$.2
4.4 +4.8
4.5 �4.$
4.p �4.4
4.2 +�4.�
1 D.9 +11.2
3.3 +3.7
4.fl +4.2
3,5 +3.7
4.8 +5.2
3.7 +3.9
3.8 +4.0
6.� +6.3
7.9 +8.1
4.2 +4.fi
6.fi +fi.8
Final
Voi[#
Ratio
a.$B
Q.92
d.6a
a.68
o.s�
d.71
Q.64
1.�3
Q.81
0.88
�.86
Q.87
�.95
a.�o
D.54
1.03
�.7"€
0.63
Q.$1
fl.65
1.Q3
�.65
Swell
te�ay
3.8
�JO
O.D
0�2
1.6
0.7
-0.2
1.5
3�3
2`3
n.9
2`3
Q!5
a.�
0`6
1`2
�JD
�.5
0.�
2.5
1;3
-D.1
_s�
RC]N�. ,�„
The sweli tesi results generally indicate low to moderate swell po#ential with sufFicient moisture
increase in the Stratum I clays; howe�er, the corresponding sw�ll press�re measured in a sam�le
obtained from B-17 exceeded 8,0�� psf, indicating high swell pressures. 6ased vn aur evaluatian
af the su�surface canditians, we estimaie typical swsll pressures af appraximately 3,Q�0 ta 6,��0
psf, and a swell potential of appraximately 1%2 percet�t for design analyses.
As an additional means of evaluating subgrade swell potential, Potential Verti�al Rise (PVR}
estimates were also performed in general accordance with the Texas Department of
Transpartation (Tx��T} Test Methvd Tex-124-E. The TxD�T �nethad is empirical, assumption-
based, generaEized, and based on correlations with the A#ter�erg limits, density, and maisture
content af the svils at the time af the in�estigation. All conditivns dictating swel! potential are nat
accounted far in this procedure. The pracedure was applied fo an estimated �2-faat deep active
zone, iimited by the depth to weathered limestflne, for soils in a dry mQisture candition. Based on
the TxDnT rrtethod, the estirr�ated PVR is appraximately 1 tn 2 inches. 6ased on the PVR
analyses, the �ollawing parameters have been used to e�aluate foundation d�sign alternatives:
Ta�al� 4: Untreated 5ubgrade Ma�ement Patential
Material ❑esign Depth �feetj �S��mated 5well llntreated Swelf
Pressure �psfj Potentiai tinches}
Fat Clay an�# Lean Clay E 3,Oa0 to f,DflO 'i to 2
We have divided the site int� two zor►es bas�d on the estimated PVR. The zones are illustrated
an the Boring Locatian ❑iagram on Plate A.3 in #he appendix.
5.3 5eismic 5ite Class
The site class for seismic design is based an se�eral factars that include subsurface prafile, shear
wa�e velocity, density, relati�e hardness, and strength, averaged vver a depth of 100 feet. The
barings for this project dici not extend ta a depth of 100 feet; therefore, we assumed the conditians
helow the depih of the horings ta be similar to those encountered at the terminaEi�n depth �f #he
barings. Based an Section 1613.2.2 af the �01$ International Building Cade antf Tabie 20.3-1 af
ASCE 7-16, we recommend using 5ite Class C�stifF soil 1 saft r�ck] far seismi� design.
R�NE }
.,.. ,,,�
6 FDIJNDATIflN SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIDNS
Design evaluations have been made for the building foundation systems based on vur curre�t
understanding of the prvject and the availaf�le subsurFace informatiart. The propased buildings
may be supported on sla� fvundations heari�g within er�gi�eered fill or suitahle native soil. A
schematic cross-sectian of the fvundatian system is provided below.
Figure 2: 5iab Foundatian 5ystem Cross Section 5chematic
Fai��e+g �nxdr
_ � T `�i.�� f
F'risx Ctr� r _— -- � �
�� �. x� ��
?� j r �2 tryuirered �fl ----- - —. � :^ ------ r�_ �' __-.
_ i — — � --� —r N�f:f.p SCH �?S 5 CHaTiS _ � �r-'."""_"'�
_- _ ' ��.,,...' - �_�'• '�.._�..�-.^'-.- - � � � •�
_�„r' . — . . _� •' •'� •�:�.��,� - �'-'�i.a
�:.... ___ �J ' . —�---� �' ' . ' S[veaioetee ii�ieSTaiee' r - ��'—
:�:�-� '.:�" �_
IiA! !0 5[d�P ""`-"''-- L�iTs:SL�f
The recammended subgrade modificatian should resuft in the following ground stability
impro�ements when canstructed as recommended in this report. These parameters should k�e
used for design of the structural foundation system.
Tahle 5: 5ummary of Estimated Grountf Im�ara�emen#
Material
Imparted Fill �if used}
Recompacted Subgrade
Nati�e Fat Clay 1 Lean Glay
Thiakness frvm Firoal
Paci Ele�atian [feet]
1
C �
2to18
Estima#ed 5well Swell Potential at
Pressure [psfl Finisi�ed Pad �inci�e
Negligible
:11
3,Oafl to 6,�0�
Negligible
1 ta 2
NIA
6.1 G�'nund Modification and Subgrade Treatment
Modification af the existing subgrade material is designed to cantral the buiiding pad subgrade.
Any grade raise fill used to achieve final pad ele�ations serves a similar purpase. ��erexca�ati�n
is not required far subgrade treatment; howe�er, all filE shouid be placed using the �ornpactions
controls recornmended in this report. Engineered fill should extend at least 5 feet lateraiiy beyond
tl�e prQpased building perimeters to allow for at�equate edge treatment. In areas where adjacent
flatwork abuts the buildings, the recornpacted subgrade shvuld exterrd the full width of the
pa�ement to ba�k of curb, vr landscape area.
.t , .. :
R�NE j
�.. ,r��.
fi.1.9 Suhgrade Recampactivn
The subgrade recompaction is designed to restructure the cohesi�e soils such tha# strength and
valume change can be better cantrolled. C]etermination of th� compaction energies and
�arr�pactian e#ficiencies required far the existing soil property ranges aifow ihis contrvl. Effective
canstruction controls for the prvposed fiff elements are pravided in 5ection 8 Consiructian of
5ubgrade Fills. Estimated c�nstruction performance and results are alsa included.
5.1.2 Exca�ation Safety Considerations
All ex�avations should be sloped, shared, or shielded in accardance with Qccupativnal 5afety
and Health (05HA) requirements. In accardance with Texas State Law, the design and
maintenan�e of excavation safety systems is the sale responsibility of i�e constru�tion contractar.
�SHA Standards 29 CFR —192� Subpart P, including Appersdices A and B> should be referenced
fflr guidance in the design of su�h systems.
fi.2 Faundativn 5tructure
Slab faundatians hearing in engineer�d fil� or suitable na#ive sail may be used to suppart the
proposed strucfs�res, provided fill construction and testing is pertarmed as recommended in this
report. Ground mavement potential will be limited wi#h the recommencled design provisions;
hawever, the grade-suppvrted slabs should �e designed ta accvmmodate sorne potential vertical
ground movement. A m�isture barrier should be placed immediately beneath the �oncrete slabs.
l 51TE PREPARATI�N FOR C�NSTRUCTI�N
T.1 General
Remo�e existing foundations, structures, deleteriaus materials, de�ris, utilities and other
manmade features, and reiocate utilities as required and in accordance witl� the plans and
specifications.
7.� Existing Grades
All �egetatian and organi� matter, including #ree sturnps and raot systems, should be removed
from within the proposed canstru�tian iirriifs. Remaval should extend at least � f�et bey4nd the
perimeter af grade supp�rted struciures, ex�ept where vegetatian must be maintained accarding
to the design documents. Unless othErwise specified, all mater�als res�liing from clearing and
gruhbing ❑perations shvuld be properly dispased. In no case should any organic or tieleterious
Chapel Hill Mu€tifamily
RON�
materiai resufting frvm clearing and grubbing operations t�e used within the earEhworks or fill
materials, or permanently placed onsite except where authorized by the geotechnical engineer.
T.3 Exca�ations
All excavatians should be pertormed to the limits and grades indica#ed in the design documents.
This study was not performed ta evaivate #he difficulty of ripping, prvicessing andlor excavating
the on-siie materia4s, or estimating the vvlume of thase exca�ated materials. The earthwork
contra�tvr should ha�e experience in constru�tion and exca�atian within these materials. The
contractar must use his or her vwn experience when making decisians regarding means, methods
and costs to accvmplish the proposed constructian, including exca�ation tools, excavation rates,
and number of trucks.
8 C�NSTRUCTION �F 51J6GRADE FILLS
5ail fill elemen#s are critical campvnents af any fvundation system. 5trength and stability of the
fill are esser�#ial to limiting subgrade mo�ements below foundations, flaar slabs, and pa�ements.
Mechanical soil cvmpaction �s designed to imprave the engineering properties af soils; however,
inadequate fill cantrol methods often dv r�at achieve the desired campactian during constructivn.
The sail construct�an specificatians in this report prQvide for efFective cvrnpactiQn control,
including direct data �erificatian and real-time control.
The fill canstruction specifi�ations pravided in this repart are designed for the specific
geotechnical requirements of this project. The specifications pravide the construction contro�s
needed to prepare cohesive fills far saturativn and drying potential. If the spe�ified c�ntrals are
nat praperly implemented, the fills will be �ulnerable ta strength loss and swell with saturation,
and potential shrinkage fram drying. The �nitiatian of shrinkage or swell'sng can lead ta increased
shrink-swell cycles with moisture variation.
The design af these sail campactian specifications inclt�des estimates of compa�ted sail
praperties correspanding ta �arying compaction energies and campaction effi�iencies, enabling
assessment vf the final campacted perFarmance �f the fill. The constructivn specifications belaw
will prepare the fills for potential saturatian; howe�er, the environments af these fills must maintain
generally moist conditians with�u# exeessi�e drying. ln many cases, equilibrium mais#ure ranges
can be established during c�nstru�tion, but in ather cases equilibrium moisture ca�not be
Chapel Hi1l Multifamily
R�NE j
,... ,�,�
achi��ed withaut main#enance following construction. Patential maintenance requirements f�r
fills on this praject are discussed in Section '�'I Site Completion and Maintettance.
8.1 Suhgrade Preparativn
After site �fearing, the expased su�grade should be prepared for c�nstru�tion af foundatian fills.
All areas that will underlie foundatians, floor sfat�s, or pavements wil� require ground mvdification
as presented in the fallvwing sec#i�ns.
Expased subgrades in cut areas of 3�eet ar less should he scarified to a depth af 8 inches and
recompacted wet af tF�e optimum maisture cantent at full compa�tion in constructian, to at least
95 percent a# maximum density in canstructivn, as generated hy a CAT 563 foated compactar �r
appro�ed equivalent. Field �erification testing will be conducteai in accordance with 5ectivn $.3
[�ua�iiy Control and Field Verificatian Testing. Any areas where the specifie� properties are
not achieved often indicate a svft or low modulus subgrade is present below the campacted lift.
If testing �onfirms that soft sails underlie any section af the recompacted surtace, those se�tions
shauld be ❑verexcavated anct recampacted in lifts as required by the Geote�hnical Engineer.
$.2 Suhgrade �ill Construction
All fountiations and pavements in�lude a structural fill element. These fi11 elements are criticaf to
graund modification requirements and the strengtE� and sfabili#y of each foundation. Fill
canstruction requiremer�ts depend an the design purpose and ser�ice canditions af ea�h fill, Each
fill element must �e constructed to a�hie�e the properties required far the long term stability of
each fountfativn. Each campleted lift o� fiil sf�auld be maintained at t�e recammended m�isture
le�el until placement of subsequent fill ❑r permanent protective co�er such as pa�ement ar flaar
slabs.
8.2.1 Project Fills
The #ill elements identified for this proje�t are listed �el�w:
. Recorripaction of existing suhgrade and grade raise below the floor slabs and pa�ements
• Uti� ity trench bac#cfill
• General fills for site grading and r�rainage
Chapel HiI1 Muftifamily
R��,�.,. ,�,
8.2.2 Fili Material Requirements
The following table pravides general praperty requirements and applications far the cohesi�e soils
that may be used as fill an this project.
Table B: Fill Material
Material � Saurce � Property Ranges � Use
Native Clay On-Site ��A Building and Pavement
Subgrade
Imported Fil! ��pQ� CL: 15 � PI � 35 or �lexihle Base Building Pad Cap
Per�ent sift � ��°Io (opfionalj
Silt s�il classificatians are not aGceptable. Gra�el content should be generally less than 20
p�rcen#. Fill shvuid be #ree of or�anics, debris, large rocks, and deleterious material.
8.2.3 Borrow Selection
Rone can assist f�e cantractar in the selectian of barraw saurces and compactor pairings in ❑rder
to reduce moisture amendment �eeds during cor�struction. With this ass�star��e, permissihle soil
prvperty limits may also be expanded t�y matching the campactian energy of specific carripactors
with the soil anci moisture ranges of borrow ma#erial.
Far imprv�ed controi ant� more consistent fill prvperties, stratified barrow sources appraved for
use as fill rr�ateriai should be ex�a�ated and processed in a manner to produce consister�t mixing
and increased unifarmity of the fiH materials. The Geate�hnical Engineer of Recorc4 can provide
additional guidan�e for this as needed.
8.3 Fill Cvnstruct�on 5pecificatians
In general, all fill svils should be placed in consistent loose lift thicknesses, and fully and unifarmly
compa�ted across each lift. The moisture cantent at the time af compaction should be wet of the
�ptimum moisture content in construction as defned hy the field compa�tion curves provided in
this repart. Ar�y moisture adjustments that are required shauld be completed before compactian.
Each lift shauld �e compacted using at least the minimum number of passes required to acF�ieve
full campaction as specified by the Geatechnical Engineer of Recvrd.
�
R�NE �
��
The compaction specifications for soil canstruciion provided in this repor� have been de�eloped
for each fill expected on this project. These spe�ifications are hased �n the predetermined
campactian pertarmance af specifi� compactor and soii �ombinatians relaii�e to the known praject
design requirements. The recommended cantrols have bee� develo�ed based ar� saurce sail
and moisture ranges determined during the site explaration, and typical compactors suitable for
these fills and fill vafumes. The specificativns employ family-vf-curve metha�#s for com�activn
curves produced during construction in order t� use the campactvr's performance far control and
accammadate svil �ariation d�ring �onstructi�n. RECF"' Compaction Design Reparts sz�pparting
this analysis, alang with the resulting process controi requirements, are inciuded rn #he appendix
of this report. The �vnstruction specifi�atians and illustrations of �he pertormance, range and
limits af c�nstruction far each fill type are provided beiow. At the end af this se�tion, a summary
table is pravided as a quick referen�e fvr the fill specificativns. Addit�onal information can afsa f�e
provided regarding aiternati�e compactors to ac�aunt for changes during cpnstructian and optimal
selectio� by the earthwork contractar.
All campleted lifts shouid be protected k�y subsequent lifts placed as soort as pra�tical during
construction. Completed lifts ta be expasec€ mare than 1 day should b� kept wet with ligh# waier
application. Completed lifts damaged by desiccation, erosian, constructior� traffic, or other
disturbances sh�uld be s�arified and re-compacted according to the process cantrv� requirements
for that particular fill.
8.3.1 Reca�npaction of Existing 5uhgrade and Grade Raise 6elow 6uildings
The t�uilding pad suhgrade fifls should be fully and unifarmly compacted wet of the optimum
moisture con#ent during consiruction. Use a faoied compactor equivalent ta a CAT 563, as
approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Compact in 9-inc� I�ose lifts t� at least 93
percent o� the maximum dry density in �onstruction and to an air per�entage not exceeding 7.2
per�ent. The optimum moisture cantent and maximum density in constru�tion are determined
from the field maisture-ciensity curves (field campa�tion curves} generated by the �ompact�r for
the range of sails used in constru�tian. This fiamily-af-curve range far the specified compactor
energy is pra�ided by the Geote�hr�ical Engineer of Record.
Figure 3 pravides the performan�e and design �anstruciion range far the specified campactar
and the in-situ maisture ranges re�ati�e ta the design maisture range for constru�tian. This range
can be refined with mare sail infQrmation prior to ar during constructi�n. A diagram of the
R�NE /
,.. ,�'�
cvmpaction specifi�ation is pra�ided vn the Compactian Cantrol Chart in Figure 4. The
Cflmpacf�an Cantrol Chart in�ludes the required Gar�stru�tion range and minimum number af
passes required far full lift compactian. The construction range provided is vnly valid far fuli
compaction using at ieast the mir�imu� nurnber of passes. Additional control specifications are
als❑ nated �n the chart. It is criti�al for the strength and stability req�irernents vf the fill that each
li�t is fully and unifprmly campa�ted using a# least tha mir�irnum number �f passes far the
compactor-sail range combinatiar�. Figure 4 can he used as a separate reference during
cQnstructian. The RECT"` Compa�tion Design Reports cvvering the soil ranges at the site are
inciuded in Appendix 6.
C}ry [3en�,ity �Pefj � Void Ratio (ej
a �
� �x
� �o �
�
Nm
o i
�
s v
� � r
�n
0 0 �
r
�_�
m w r
�
m m T
�^ �. a
f �
��
W
C �
;v
3
cn
n�
�
az
�m
� �
� i �
u, n �
C � m
� � w
�a
Z
�v
Q
� N
v�'
Z
� _
� �
D
2
�
?.
r^.
� �.
�
n � � a � �
� c C'�nm�
+� Cl3 U7 � Z fYl
a�maznc�
m W � 1
p W w-C m Z
� ., a
� • "
m
�
S 2
N
A
�
0 ❑ 0 � N
� � � a
m m m m
N N
N N
o a
� � �
�
--r� -r
�-+ � 9
a� b
�
n � T'
�,,�
�C 1 �
w`��
m � v�a
� � f0
" ]
�
I
I
I
�
�
i
1
!
1
1
1 �
I �
� i �
w � p •
� i
� � �.
� I �
� ��
��
�,�
�
n � v!
v �c
C �
v 1 �
�C � O.
� � T
--��
�m
�
1
!
I
i
�
�
I
E
!
�
-- � --
1
i
i
i
I
i
� �
� � T
7
� ' C
I�
C 1
a � �
rq � C
��
n
n; � �,
I
� I ^
� � C
.. � k!�
�. 1
�
I
i
I
!
�x
�
�. -- �, �,
�, i� _. �r _, � r � _
p a o o v o o a o 0 o a a o a o 0
� a7 N V V Qt Q+ Vi lfi �n A A A W W W W
Q� 1-a 01 �v V W �O Q1 n. � Vi rV � V � �"
�
m
x
�
�
Nn� n
� C
n�
N
2 �
��
r �°
N
Q �
�o
� r�a o
0 0 3
� � �
N � n
o. �, o
� � �
�
3
� �
m
t �,Cq Q �' I} FF
W �.p L v►Nie ��
C m � � 3� 3� if
o m 3 � •
� fn m !�; i
� � � V '�I
� � N
/
G }'' � � j •
� .A 4�i � �
� - - - - � �,,. A � r � � ♦
�+ '
� f r
� � N s ..
♦
I � C � � � ,�1
, �, o�a � .
� � i
I V j f�6 � .+
f M N / ♦
i b � , `,i
� D � � i
N /
I �, � N '/
� �a' � i
F+I� N r
A I Fh I+ '
� � n� N r
o i p O LJ'1 �
I f
I � C � � �f � 1
� � '° %f � q � o •
,� . w i
� 61 ,f � r" I
7 I ' �
1 � ��
� r a C C
� j� w n� � o o rov n y�� a� a�
! � 1, IH � 3 o�i � GNj a � �' O, ¢��+
� � n � �, a o • � $ � i ° � ° K �
� � i n��vv � .�'3. � a � � K 3 � a
� I / A�� n� �.`P. n n � c d� c � c� E
� � 3 w Y 3 �' a a � � 3 � � _ '
i • ro � v' °; o m° r� 3 fl
.� �I � � '^ w 4 c � 'a � � � � � 3 y �
---- � �' m �n � � �� � � � � a � N V', a � � �
1• O w Ln � tL !0 d b O I N 7 � C O �
� ; � � �' N A �- y � n n 3 � � o w `-'�. � �'
� � o� c I y s� �� N �!�? ro � o_ a m � m
�a � ' r, - '�
I n = � �^ Q � m aN 0. � � A � � '� � .�» m
` � ❑� w' �❑ C �. n ro � � x 7 �C 3 2
��� N v e�v ���? P� j � N� r➢ � �. 3 � O
! � N� Q� v' �� rC C,�^j � rp W O 6
/ O y N � N fo �� 3� N d � � � �
� - n [1 = n� u_�n. r7 � x =- c c n
i °' °�� n 0 u 3 a I� m � � o
■ '� � a �„ r.� _ - � n+ a � m > >
i � R m N Y �� 6�1 pu ''' p O oi n
� �c o
�, p Q O � O � d 7 v� � �
�� N❑� � C M O y V � C
�• a � P � u°�i � Ou � � o
I .� ? � ~ � � � � � � 7
� _ � a a a �
/ � v'-� Q p n � N
+I p � — C `�
� a �+
m �
.� 7. �
� �
o Q
� w' �.
i M �
� n
� �
o �`'
fD �
� �
�
"C �
v ti
D �
� �
� '�
� rp
�
� �
� �
f'1 rt
� ��
� �.
rr „�
R p�,
� C
rC d
Oi r�'t
� "i-
_ �i
o�
s
!f'1
�
�
�
�
�
r
D
C
u
�
T
i
d
�
�
�
�
lD
O
�
C
�
�
�Q
n
�
�
�
�
•C
fp
�
C]ry lJen�ity (p�f} � Void R�itio (eJ
a �
n �S
� �
p rn�
�
�
� _
T�v
0 o m
� r
n=
o g �
r
�z�
�=�
��
�
N � �
� C
W �
co
� �
o�
z
C1 n
�
� ❑
O Z
n�
T �
mp
� r �,
C3 �
(n C
�a A
c� �
� �
� a
m�
��
m0
n �
D .N,�
3 �
n�
_i ❑
Z �
:� x 1 �. � J � ti
�� I 1 I I � 1 I 1 I 1 I l I I I I I 1 1
1-. �.a p O O O q O O 4 D d O O 4 O O O d O
❑ Q �O �4 CO W V V Pi �i1 vi v1 V1 A 4 A W W W �
W W V tin Q� Oe n. V W �p O� A.i l0 �n Ra �p V A
s
�
�
N F� �
�
�
N
ro ? �
n rp �
3 a m
.� �n �
a�o
��_
0 � n
7 V' 3
S �
-• p O
h d �
s �+ a
m = �
� � a
� � N
M Q �
� o a
� � �
oi _
� m �
� a .
O w n
� �
�=o
���
� ��
� �
N
a � �
n a ^p
o � �
� r�e a
❑ � �.
� � �
� o n'
0
a�- '
� w
a��
� ��
o�
_o.�
y�x�vT�
� C C � m d
� Ur (!3 r2 Z I'il
o m� o z r�
m � � � m 2
❑ �
[D ••
� .. -.
=1 � �_� ��� .
a a n a
1 � � �
m m m m
N N
N iU
a v
N �
�. 4�
� x
C �
�
3
M
�
�
�
Q
7
'Q � f�
rp = � r
� � rt �
� � F+ •,
A �
�q O 'p i
en � � ��r
� �
!V V ��
� � � � � �r,
.
� , r
,
. .
3 �
i
C� I �
s
� �
� � .
v �
ry �
7 . •'
w �
� / :
•
� �
� � •
•
'v �r
� � .
.
.
.
/ '
1
!
/ •
,`
.
. f V Ql lJ� A W N F' f'1
/ fl
I
7
. i` a`L o`� o� T c v° �o °
. � � r�o ro � �' � q �'
.' � �d3���; �oG �
� ��� on � g' 3
/ + Q �' � � � r' '� � � n m
� � p " � � c a ro � a � ,nY o ro '!
■ m q s a� �, � rc � m a
1 ■� � �,� o a�, �'*aro'��� ia
I .� R rG C k �.�i p� n d o ' n�
ro — -� n ' o 0
� �� ax 3o rc �am n^'o �a
� —� � 3 Q� �� o °' r„'o m �
�
� N � H � � ro � � N � 3 �
� �° °—' � �n a o ��''"
' j C � io 7 7 m
�� � � H � �' � � m � ° a
x.�r.3 a y H
I� � � � � T 3 oai � � ~ j
� � � .� C � _ � � �, G rC
• � Q � 3 � �' o � �
� m ro °° — ��� w� 1
i �' �� a� o � � u i � � I
� a a4'o � � � °�� r I �o �
■ � �p oo � 4' pe • � 1
�� � ro 0-'� S� � n�? � � N 1
I� r��o ���� g c �� � I_� �
■ �^ � c� �, G' � � w � n � C � N
■ °� O� r� N S Q .� � N O Y
� ;y � o 0 0 3 �. ¢ � L r
� � v��'?� m p. n O °1 C G7 m
■ `° .h. °' _ .* w o � i z
� �
r a � `" o � ,., n�
� n � �o v �, �� n
� r� 3 m c o �, °: �0 �� a°10
,� `. m ❑ �' � !° � � T
O
,/ N Q. � � � � �
��' / •�' 3 C=C
•" � A
E � �
a� o
1.� N� r.�.
b � (�
� �
� �
v �
�
��
�
'� �
a ni
a =
I� Q �
C3 �
rr �
P1
� 3
I �
n �*
� �1J'1
p1 �
� �.
V7 �
,-r T
� ❑
� R
�
v �
•C
� �
� _
��
x 7
�•
�
�
�
A
Oq
cp
P
O
�
ro
r
�
�
_
LH
Q
.�
C1
7
�
fQ
Q
C
�
'�
f�
t5
C]
�C
r
�
"C
�
Z
RQN�„ .,,
8.3.2 Utility Trench Back�ill
Lltility trench backfill shauld consist vf fat clay uniformly campacted in 6-fnch Iovse lifts wet of the
optimum mvisture content to at leasf 9� percent of the maximum dry density, as determined from
representati�e 5tandard Proctar curves narmalized an the fab line-of-aptimums far ihe svil range
used, and carrected accarding to standard dry unit weight relatiar�s. Air content shauld nat exceed
7.2 percent at any time. LJse hand-vperated compa�tion equipment as appra�ed by the
Geotechnical Engineer af Record.
The family of cur�es and constructian accepiance range wi�! be pro�icfed by the Geote�hnical
Engineer af Recard. The general performance, range a�d limits of this constructi�n using an
approv�d �ampactor is illustrated on the Compac#ian Pertvrmance and Design Chart, Figure 5
below. This specificativn is presenied graphi�ally vn the Campacfion �ontrol Chart, �igure 6;
hvwever, it shouid t�e refined as necessary prior to constru�tion using additional sut�surface
information.
-=.., :; :';�
n �
� �x
� �
� �
Nm
�
�_
3 �
o ° �
�n
0 0 �
� o r
' � �
� _.0
W N �
y �1'I
� �
��
C7
❑
�
�
�
�
C Z
� �
rm
��
�o
m 3 '-'
za �
.�]
� ('} �
�
� �
�p
�m
N
�
Z
i�:
x
a
�
x �:
�
I --rj -F
� �►�� a
i
� 4wf �
I
n � T'
� i G
� i�
���
.� � �
�,�
��^�� -
i
�
�
�
1
�
�
�
i
��
1 �
�ia
� �a
a,
� �3.
C � �1
� � M -
� i
rp � �
ry I V?
� � C
� �
v ��
.� � a
ro � �•
" � c
I�
1
1
�
�
�
�
I
�
�
i
I
^__*�_'
�
�
E
r
�
�
��
� � �
� � _
--��
��
� � r:
� i�
�'�
n
N � �.
� � �
v �� •
� � � �
. �- I
I
I
I
�
v
�� �
a�
�
�
�
�.
�
�
� .Z1 ."{1 p �l �
�
� C C � f�i1 fl
n� o z a n
m � � �
� j W � � Z
m ' ❑
� '
�■■�.�
n a n a N
� � --1 �
m rn m m
N N
N N
N N
O O
� � _
m7
�ry Density (p�fj � Voic4 Ratio (ej
_. _ �
_ r _ �. � . ... v�
O O O O q O O O O }5 O 6 O a O O G
�-�. v�i � rn ti � w b rn n"', e u{'i na, b v a �-�''�.
n G�i n
Q a o
� o�
N n
.r
Q � =
o��i � � �
� ro o �
� � _
� � ~
�
Q1 ¢ � �
� n •
�o '
a �
� .
.
.
o :
a ;
N /
' /
v ;
o `� , � ,
.
��.:�.Y �
/
�' �'1 ���� /
- � ---- � _. ... �.
.
/ �
1 •
1 / I�
� / �, rr'
� , /
.
� / i
i
1 / ' ��
1 I /I
I �
I � . ,!
� Q � r� � '
I� � Ir � I � � _
�+ -
N ��j � ,' I � � ] � L: 47
�' � % � � � I
i❑ � r t �
� i N• �
N �� � I/ O O C� �
r v r G
lD I ro +� �`� � L C m� r�o � n
a�� r �-�� �,aono;
� � � �� '� n °: o � o � o _'. �
�
�� � • �7���.,���o�
� ro r o
� � � ro z m � � � �
� �' v �� w r..+ � z`�' � .°�' m� o � 3 n
� rr � �Qe 3_: 3� o
� l� N N N 3 3 K 3 7 ��
��,'' z? oo m n
� I, 7 N h �� Q � � 7 C C
r3' ► n c �� a ro c o p `^ � �
I • � o � "
I �� if � O� w= rn i a� � 4 n � p
I ; � � �, �o � o n � ro � � p � �
I ► tG � A �y O F,, C 3 � w I
, ■ � d � ��, �� � •�
� N, ���.+ a� � N � a� o C
I i ■ oa �o �
W . �� � p° N E N rG z. 3-
---� � �� w cn � r.i n p� � �
I ►fI n�,n A� N� '^ 3 ro 3 'a
m � a � s
i p a�ad v�i� � p��
' 1 � p � c � oi y - . a
� � � � � `� � x � � o �
� ► ro Q rp �'- � a2 ui � � �•
■ Q- o+ Q d '�
M F' a ° °° ^
r : _ �3 N �"� ' o =
� N O 7 N O ,�-�
� �� � 3»A � a c
l� � � �n w .1 a ``�
� � �
� • p � � � a
� n, r m . 3
� T� w � a
/ C � � �
� D �r
■ ,�� ■ `�
■ n.
c
� � '�
a a. v
r„ rn �•
�n ++ �p
� n
� �
Q �
F-'ti
'^. A
� �
� N
� E
Q n
.•a�
� �
n =
� =
� �
v �
� �
W �
o3 �
3 T
� ❑
� �
3 D
� �
7 T
� �
�
� �
�
Q
�
CJ
�
f1G
fC
0
C
�
�
f4
i�1
%] °'�
�
o �
fC
�
pry F3ea�Fty (pcf) � Void Ratio €ej
n �
� �_
� �
° �
�rn
o T
�
T � �
o °, m
� r
n
0 0 �
r
? _ �
� N r
1
N d n
� �
��
n
❑
�
�
a
n
�
�
C Z
�n
P ❑
��
�
�
�o T
Z n C
nT � m
µ � W
^ �
�n
r0
r �
�
�
C
L7
�
D
�
,... �. �-
r x _ _ _ � �. _ ` ,.
�.
� I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
�-. !-� o a o a a o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o a a v
� O � � rn � avi � v w w tr�i R�i � vai hA, W � a i-w.
�
�
S
f-'
N �'IZ
a
�
N
T 3 0
m �
n �q
� a m
K N �
O � O
N�=
� � n
� N �
N a �
n a� �
3 � R�
� C T
� 3 a
y� � N
Q �
� � Q
� � �
w _
3 ro �
� a _'
o � a
-� m
� � o
m =
� C d
� � 3
� v �
y
T�
❑„�.
�� a
o � �
m �
Q � n
� N f0
� o �
0
�� 3
� �
D � N
� � �
= S
0 y� f0
_ O �
:r
n � � ❑ � �
� C C � m �
:� Ui U7 � 2 R'I
o m� o z r�
� � m � m �
� O
m
� • ..
m
x
O O Q ❑
� � � �
m m m m
N N
N N
N N
O �
y �
�
0
N
_"
�
�
,.� � 7
�
f0
I
rt % � �/
� ''r F
Q = N ��'
� 3 �i% /�
ro � � �.
�' a •�
� - i
n � •
� � !�i
� a ,�•
n •
NV r__ .
� � , �r
o , •
�
r
I f
� r
!
3 , /,
r
D �
� I i
•
r
O +
@ . /
� �
N �
� /
� . f
/
,
n � :
� �.
� ■
� ► cn A W N r+ C1
• O
� � .�i
/
:� o�`L� m � a a o
. N
� u� m n� a ie
,' � � ae', � 3 3 �
I /� �R,�����
�� 3 T O ry"' �' O
� � .
> >
� A� Q 1➢ � C � u�
� o � . �
, � �� � � ` n ra
! C O� N p j C
, •J 7 N N � � � N
► � � _ �
. � �c�x� �
� � � � � > >
� � � N � n a'
� m o �,
iro g � ,�n3, o�
� c � � c �
� •
� o w � p° �� I
►� ro d� 3 n I � � I
' � e Q� o C__ E Ip I
r 3�0 3? I�r.�., 1
if ��� m � �_I �
I i � m°' w o � c 3e
i � � �� � a n � m
I F' a 7— u� n 7v � cn
�� p N' p �' ai d p Ll m
1 � m �n � � ❑ a N O
� m � j ^ �? D�
� � � C 3 � 00
� � � N � � S
� C Q •C ro r0 r➢ ❑
� r�. O �
/ � � , ?
. 1 �. .
! _.
1 � �
�
0 0
,� N. v,
t4 '+ �
� n
rn �
v �"
�
N �
�
ri �
� �
v �
� �
Q �
� � �
♦ �
� �
i-F �
� _
S =
� �
� �
❑ rt
� �'
� �.
� -f1
� �
� �
7 D
� rt
� ti
� �
o x
�
�
(Il
Q
�
or
3
�
�
O
C
�
�
�
h
m
�
r
m
�C
fQ
z
RQN /
�
8.3.3 General Site Fiils fflr 5ite Grading and ❑rainage
Piace and compact general site fills far landscape grading and drainage using native clay.
Compact in 12-inch Ivase iifts with the earthmo�ing equipment onsite. lJse visual contrals for wet-
of-optimum campactivn. SurFtcial topsoif in landscape areas does nat require �ampaction heyand
that praduced by the equipment used fvr spreading and grading.
8.3.4 Cvmpa�iinn Specifi�atian Summary
The fallowir�g sumrnary table is pro�ided for quick reference purposes. The table d�es not fully
encampass ar replace the cvmpa�tion specifica#ions pro�ided for each fill in the sectivns above.
Tabte ?: Cvmpaction 5pecification Summary
Building Fad and Utility Trench General 5ite
Fi11 p��$ment Suhgrade Ba�kfill Grading
Material On-Site Clay �n-5i#e Clay �n-Sit� Clay
Campactor
Minimum Fov# Length {inches)
Maximum Lift Thickness {inchesy
Minimum N�m#�er af Passes
Maximum Air Voids t°Ioj
Minimum Dry Der�sity �pcf}
Minirrzum Moisture Content �°/aj
Min. Compacted 5trength (psf�
CAT 563
6
9
8
7.2
94.0
14.D
3,2�a
Hand aperated
NA
fi
NA
7.2
89.0
# 5.5
NA
NA
NA
12
fVA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.4 Quaiity Control and Field Verificatian Testing
Bef�re fill canstruction, the property ranges of fill materials shauld be determined using index
property iesting. ❑uring constructiQn, index properties shauid be obtained periadically and upon
changes in material, colar, texture, or ex�a�ation pro�edures. Field compaction �urves should be
ohtained upon unexpected changes in sail properties, compactor, ❑r lift thickr�ess, and at
rninimurn frequencies recommended by Rone based upon the praperty ranges �f each fill material
and expected �ariations. Barrvw material sampling during cons#ruction sh�uld be planned and
coardinated t� fit the required pradu�iion rates, and generally at least twa days in advan�e of the
compaction o# carresponding fifl lifts.
Chapel Hill Muftifamily -
RDNE %
,,. ,,,�
Rone shauld monitor cr�mpa�tian and conduct verificatiQn t�s#ing during all fiil canstruction.
Verificatia� testing of campacted lif#s shauld he conducted at appropriate frequancies ta ensure
that compa�tian controls are satisfier4 and design requirements are achieved in constructian. The
engineer should monit�r the number vf compactor passes, fift thi�kness, air conten#, rnoisture and
density far ea�h fill. During fill cvnstruction, relati�ely undisturh�d samples �f the compacted fill
material shoufd k�e callected periadically and tested #v cvnfirm the desired strength and stabiliiy
p�aperties for which the specific cvmpaction cantrols were designed.
lt is re�ommended #hat Rane assist in develaping a wark plan for efFective pracess controls
designed far engineering requirements, the canst�-uction plan, praduction needs, and dire�t data
�erification rec�rds.
Nuclear density gauges are recommended for field testing o€ cor►�pacted lifts. Rone will pra�ide
the specific gravity [GS} �alues required far each fill, based an compactor pertormance and the
svil variatian expe�ted during �onstru�tion. The GeQfechni�al Engineer must alsa be ahle ta
monitor the sp�cific gravity setting remately in real-time based on the gauge readings in the field.
8.5 Canstruction ��ersight
❑esign requirements and recommendatians presented in this report are based on critical cantrals
during the earthworks and sail construction pracess. The monitoring required to verify the cantrols
are cQrre�tly implemented is essential ta praper fill co�struction, The requirements af this report
are based on limited geo#echni�al, geol�gic and hydra-geologic in�armation abaut the subsurFace
�onditions. 5u�grade conditions have been interpolated hetween bvrings and suhsurface testing
la�ations. Anama{ies are often encountered tiuring constructio�. The potential far su�surFace
�ariation from the conditions used for design could result in design changes andlor increased
geatechnical risk during andlor foliowing constru�tion.
We rec�mmend that Rone k�e retairaed to provide the contrpls needed for proper s�il constructian,
mani#or earthwark operatians, ak�ser�e foundation canstruction, evaluate materials, and condu�t
periadic testing during the sail canstruction phase of the project. This enables the geo#echnical
engineer to verify design �onditi�ns, manage geatechnical risks, verify corr�pliant �onstruction,
adjust design requirements when unanti�ipated �ancSitions are encountered, assist the builder,
and represent owner interests.
� : .:�,�:
R�N�,,..,�,
9 BUILDING FOUNOATIDN STRLJCTURE
9.1 51ab Faundations
The propased structures may be supparted on graund supported foundations cans€sting af a
conventianally rein�orced beam and siah system vr a past-tensivned slab fpundation system,
pra�ided svme floor movements can �e tolerated. The foundations should be designed wifh
exterivr' and interior grade beams adequate to pr�vide sufficient rigidity to the foundation system
to tolerate the potential �ertical mavement af lF�e foundatian subgrade. The follawing
recommendatians are based upon the expectation that the site will na# require more ihan 3 feet
af cut andlor fill ta achie�e final grades.
A net allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,�DQ psf may be used fvr design af all grade bearns
bearing in tested and approved engineered fill or suitable native svil. Perirneter grade bearns
shvuld be at least 2 fee� f�elow final grades. Interiar beams should bear at least 18 inches below
final grade. The bottom of the beam tren�hes should he free of any loose vr svft material privr fo
the placement of the con�rete. All grade beams and flvar slabs shauld be adequately reinforced
far eccentric ioading that ca�ld occur fram patential differential subgrade mavement.
6ase�4 on propvsed grading pla�s, it appears that some faundatian ex�a�ations may encaunter
weathered limestone. If weathered limestone Es present at the planned bearing ele�ation in only
a partion of the foundation ex�avation, �he weathered limestvne shauld be averexca�ated at least
fi inches belaw the �earing elevation, and the pracessed material may he campacted into the
base of the excavation. As an alternative, the exca�ation rnay be extended such that the entire
foundatian is bearing on weathered limestone. The intent of this recommendatians is to reduce
the "hinge" cand�tion associa#ed with the transition of support fram soil to rock.
We have di�ided the site into twa z�nes based on the estimated PVR. The z�nes are illustrated
on the Baring Loca#ion �iagram �n Pfate A.3 in the appendix. �esign criteria for the foundation
slah ha�e been estimated according ta the Post Tensioning Institute �PTI} based an the methads
described in their most recent manual for designing slah-an-grade faundation systerns. An
effecti�e PI of 35 may he used far design af a �an�entianally reinforced concre#e slab fvundatian.
Re�ammended PTI foundati�n design criteria for a Tharnthwaite Moisture Index �TMIj o�zero are
tabulated below:
� �_.,;1::�-�
R�NE j
... ,,,�
Tahle 8: PTI Design Criteria
Parameter � Cvndition I 1-inch PVM I 2-inch PVM
Edge Moisture Variation
pistance, ern {feet}
DiHerential Sail Mo�ement, y,�
(inches]
Center L€ft
Edge Lift
Center Lift
Edge Lift
6.5
3.5
1.1
1.fi
6.5
3.5
1,4
'i .8
The PTI method in�arporates n�merous design assumptians asso�ia#ed with deri�ativn of the
�ariables needed ta estimate the foundation design �riteria. The PTI metf�vd of estimating
difFerentiak soil movement is app�icahle when site rr�aisture conditions are cantrolled only by the
�limate vn well-graded building pads {i.e. proper site drainage, praperly lined landscaped areas,
no utility water leaks or ot�er free water svurcesy. As soii moisture in�reases, ths soils may swell.
The PTI design methvd is intended t� provide stifFened foundatian systems that can perForm well
under typi�al natural changes in soii mvis#ure. The differential foundativn maveme�ts resulting
fram seasonat sail moisture variatians are typically mu�h lower than mo�ements that occur due
ta free water saurces near or beneath the structure, which are nat directly addressed �y the PTI
design method.
'!0 PAVEMENT
This repart includes recornmendatians for rigid pavements. Maintenance requirements over the
life of the pavement are typically mucfi� lower for rigid pa�emer�ts> and many consider the long-
term appea�-ance af rigid pavements an advantage. Rigid pa�ements tend to he mare durable
and require {@55 maintenance after �onstructian, and rehabilitationlreconstructian af the
pa�ement se�tion is nat typically cansidered a part o# the pavement life cycle.
When designing praposed pa�ement sections, subgrade cond�tions must be consi�ered, along
with expected traffic uselfrequency, pavement type and iniended design life. For #his pra�ect,
applicahle traff� loading conditians and pa�ement design parameters were based ❑n the City af
Fort W�rth Pavement Design Manual far an Industrial roadway classification. A more precise
desig� can 1�e made if specific traffic ioading information is pravided. The fvlfowing infarmatiar�
was used in our analysis:
RC]NE /
,�..���
Tahle 9: Pa�ement Design Input Parameters
Item Value
Roadway �esignation Coflector Resicfential
Annual Equivalent 5ingle Axfe Loads {ESALs} 10�,OdD 35,O�Q
Annual trafFic grflwth (°/o} 1.5 a.�
Refiabilit�. R [°Io] 9� 85
Initial servi�eability, pa
4.5
Terminal serviceability, ps I Z-25 I 2.D
besign life [years) 25
Con�rete modulus of rupture> 5'0 (psi) I 620
Gancrete modulus of elasticity, E� (psi} I 4,OOD,aOQ
5tandard deviation, So I 0.39
Laad transfer coefficient, J I 3.0
Drainage coefficient, Cd I 1.0
Treaied modulus af suhgrade reaction, k(pGiy I 220
T#�e pavement thickness determinatians were pertormed in general ac�ardance with the
"AASHTO Guide for the Design vf Pavement 5tru�tures 1993 editian" using the WinPAS 12
software from the American Concrete Pa�ement Assacsa#ion {ACPA}. The minimum pavemer�t
sections are presented in the tak�le belaw.
Table 10: Rigid Pa�ement 5ectivns
Thickness �fnches}
Materiaf
Collector Residential
Jointed Reinfarced Concrets 7 6
Lime Treated Subgrade 8 fi
The concrete pavement should have beEween 4 and 6 percent entrained air. We recammend a
minjmum �oncrete �orr�pressi�e strength af 4,00� psi. Hand-placed concrete shauld have a
rnaximum slurnp of 6 in�hes. A sand le�eling �ourse shauld nat be permitted beneath pa�ements.
All steel reinfvrcement, dowel spacingldiame#er, and pavement jvints should canform to lacal
municipal standards.
RONE /
�
The pa�ernent thi�kness determinati�ns were pert�rmed in general accorda��e with the "1993
A,4SHT� Guide for the Design af Pavement Structures" guidelines. The min�mum pavement
sectians are presented in the tabl� t�elaw. These pavement sections are i�ased an esiimated
traffic volumes. A mare pre�ise design can be made if detailed traffic loading information k5
provided Ev us.
1U.1 Pa�ement Sutagrade Preparatian
All topsaii, vegetation, and any unsuitable ma#erials s�ould be remo�ed. The pavement s�bgrade
should be proafroiled with a f�lly loaded tandem-axle dump truck ar similar pneumatic-fire
equi�ment to locate areas of €vose subgrade. In areas to be cut, th� proafrall shauld he performed
after the final grade is established. In areas to be filled, the proafrall sh�uld be pertormed after
subgrade construction is complete ar�d prior to placement of fi!!. Areas of laose or �aft subgrade
encauntered in the proofroll shauld be remo�ed and repfa�ed wEth engineeret4 fill, or moisture
conditianetf �dried ar wetted, as needed} and compacted in place.
Grading and campaction of pavement subgrade should follaw the recammendations in the "5ite
Preparation and Fili PlacemenY' sectian. �inal grades sh�uld he such that drainage is facilitated,
and ac�ess af surface water ta the suhgrade materials is limited.
If the moisture cantent vf the pavement suhgrade increases, it could swell anc� lose strengfh.
5hrinkage, swelling, ar strength lass could f�e detrimental ta praper perF�rmance of the pavement.
We re�ommend that the upper 5 inches af pa�em�nt subgrade be treated with a minimum of 7
percent lime (by dry soil weight}. Lirne treatrr�ent will provid� more unif�rm subgrade support and
imprav� the svif's strength characteristics. Lime treatment should be perFormed in ac�ordance
with Texas Department of Transportation �TxDQT} Item 260, "5tandard 5pecifications for
Cor�struction of Highways, 5treets, and Bridges", ar other applicable standards. Lime treating the
upper 6 inches of the subgrade sails will impro�e subgrade support, bu# will not reduce the norrnal
seasonal shrinking and swelling af the sut�grade. 5�me differential vertical mavements of the
pavements si��uld be expected. The amount and type of subgrade treatment should be
determined when the site is graded and the pa�ement su�grade is exposed. This can be dane
using standard Eime series tests.
Water can he introduced beneath the pavement through granular materials used for aggregate
hases and utiEity line embedmsnt, and can cause differen#ia[ mavement of the pa�ement. Care
�tor��
�...,�,..
should be exercised in detailing and constr�cting any pa�ement sectivns to limit the �pportunities
for water intrusion into the pa�ement section, and all utilities shauld ha�e clay plugs substituted
fc�r granular embedmen� r►�aterial at the edges af the pavement fa redu�e the risk vf maisture
ac�ess and p�ssible swelling.
1 �.2 5urface Drainage
Proper drainage is criti�al to the performance and condition af tF�e foundation and fEatwork. Positive
surFace drainage must he pro�ided that directs surtace water away from the str�a�ture and flatwork.
If water collects near or below the foundatian or flatwork, vertical svil mv�ements could exceed
estimates presented in this repart. Final surfacelpavement grades shauld slope away �rom ihe
structures at a minimum slvpe vf 2 per�ent, and steeper slapes should be used in areas without
Americans with Disabilities Act �A�A} restrictians. The slopes shaufd direct water away from the
structure, and r►�ust be maintained to prevent water ponding ad�acent ta ali site impro�ements. Gutter
downspouts and other sources of water should be iocated such that these features will nat create
moisture cancentrations near or t�eneath stru�tures ❑r pavement. Downspouts should discharge
well away from the structure, and shoukd not be allowed to erode surface soil.
Moisture-related st�bgrac4e ar�d foundatian issues can be reduced k�y extending cantinuaus ex#erior
flatwark to the building line. Joints at the interface �f the flatwork and huilding line should k�e sealed
with a flexble sealant ta limit the infiltration of water. Dpen cracks that develap in the fla#work should
als� be sealed. Joints and cracks should be inspected periodi�ally, and resealed in a timely manner.
11 SITE COMPLETIDN ANO MAINTENANCE
11.1 Site Grading and i]rainage
The geotechnical design far this projecE accaunts for limited assessment af hydro-geologic
canditions and intends to pro�ide for efforts to maintain stable, maist subgrade conditions after
c�nstruction. 5ite grading and drainage plarts shvuld support this intention where passible. 5iie
grading and drainage should be efficient in pa�ed areas and less efficient in lawn and landscape
areas. Roaf runoff should be collect�d by gutters and downspauts, and discharge anta paved
areas draining away from the huilding.
� :,=�.L. .-�: s � r.�.�,t�,��.
����
����...<<
11.2 Landscaping and trrigatian
5uhgrade moisture levels shnuld be maintained around the building perirneter before and during
construction. Irrigated landscaping and lawn areas are recammended with even d�strik�ution
around the structures. Irrigated areas will serve as su{aplemental mvis#t�re saurces surrounding
the foundations and pa�ement areas. Accardingly, regula� and uniform irrigation will be required
in these areas, particularly during dry and hot weather periods. Abave-grade planiers may a�so
be considered around the perimeter of the building with regular irrigation to maintain light
perimeter infiltra#ion along pavement jaints.
We do nat recammend the use af landscaping against vr arouncf the exteriar af the foundatians, as
4andscaped areas can adversely afFect subgrade moisture. Landscaped areas can create bath
saturated and desiccated conditions that cause locaiized differential ma�ements and the f�rmation
af cracks. If used, lanriscaping should be kept as far away frvm the faundation as possible and
positive drainage must be maintained. Landscaping elements [such as edging} must not prohibit or
slow the drainage of water. When feasible, irrigation lines and heads shauld not he pla�ed in �lose
praximity ta the foundation to prevent the collection of water near the #oundation or flatwork,
particularly in the event of leaking lines or sprinkler heads.
Trees and large vegetation should not be placed near s#ructures or mo�ement-sensiti�e flatwork.
The roat sys#ems of these plants can remove relatively large quantities of maisture frorn the subgrade
5flII5, CaUSlflg IpCaIIZBd SDII SLttIE171eC1t. Ti1B dBSICCatiDil Z011� VafiBS E]]I tfEE 51ZB ai1CI 5�70CI�S, but
trees should generally be set back at least 1% times the mature tree height, and in no cases sh�uld
the drip-iine of the mature tree extend a�er or within 15 feet af roof iines.
�z sTuoY c�osuRE
The analyses, canclusians and recammer�dations contained in this report are based on site
conditions as they exis#ed at the time of t�e field exploration and further on t�e assumption that
ths explaratory barings a�-e representati�e �f the subsur�ace canditians thraughout tY�e site with
little variance heyand that found �y the borings. If difFerent subsurface canditions fram those
en�ountered in aur borings are �bser�ed or appear ta t�e present in exca�ations, Rvne must be
advised pramptly sa that t#�ese �onditians can be e�aluated and our r�c�mmendations can be
reassessed as may be necessary. If there is a su#astantial lapse of time between sutamissian of
this report and the start of the work at the site, if conditions have �hanged due either to natural
� �._._...:�,�:_a.��
R�NE /
��
causes �or to constructian o�erations at �r adjacent ta the site, ar if sfructure lacatians, stru�tural
Ivads ❑r finish grades are changed, Rone shauid be promptly informed and retained if necessary
i# the changed conditians warrant review and reassessment.
It is impartant that Rone he retained to assist in design reviews or review those portians of the
plans ar�d specifications that per�ain to earthwvrk and foundation systems far this particular
project to ensure the plans and specificatians are consis#ent with the cantrals and
re�omment�ativn� pravided in this report. It is also advised that Rone pro�ide oversight and
monitoring services during construction to ensure that the contrals required far design
requirements during earthworks canstruction are pravided carrectly and implemented efFecti�ely.
This repvrt has been prepared far the ex�iusive use of tf�e client and their designat�d agents for
specific application to design and construction of this project. We ha�e exercised a degree of
care and skill ex�eeding that ordinarily exercised under simiiar canditions by reputa�le rnembers
of aur pro�essiar� practi�ing in the same or similar lo�ali#y. The engineering services and solutions
provided herein are cansid�r�c! advanced, and while design and constructi�n contr�ls are
improved> no warranty, expressed or implied, can he made or intended.
13 C4PYRIGHT 2Q�1 RDNE ENGINEERING SERVICES, LT�.
ThEs repor# pro�ides advanced engineering servi�es, and is in its entirety the sole property of the
client, Rone Engineering 5ervices, Ltd., and its aifiliates. Llse �f tfiis report is subject ta all
applicable copyrights. This repart may be used in practice ar referenced by any project party as
necessary, sale�y for the party's role on the project far which this repar# is prepared. Beyond that
use, na part af this repart may be capied, downlaaded, transmitted, ar atherwise reproduced ar
stored, in ar�y farm or means, except as permitted in writing by Rane Engineering 5er►rices, Ltd.
Each reproduction af any part af this repar# must in�lude all copyright natices, registered
trademark {Q} designations, and non-registered trademark [T"'} designations.
� �.-:_,
APPENDIX A
z �
� �z
m �� 4
=rn�
N
a
�x=
❑a
T
�
�n�
gmx
A°F
❑
?�c
���
m�,�,
��a
y��
�{
a
�
�
d
�
x
�
r
0�
[�
��
zW
Q
a
c�
a
3
a m � ��7y '� �
�N C Y !lfl
� o m � a n
v� °.�°.��. mz
� " •• D
�
m [7 *� +�
2 '7+ N �
� N
� A
cp �
N �
n n � � � N
m mmrn�
N N
��
� ti
��
�
__,� �
�i
J@ _ r. �
�S � '� �
�
r � � w . r� � '�^ ti.L t1
� "�J � r _ � , a,. . ' }
� � �� ' � N 1 �
� �
� : _ N ` � �
1 • � � �
� � ► ' � � I
. - � � l.i"yT- � •
� 1 . w � _ .. 6 � 1 .
. . �' �
. � r.' � u �
�_- � �
� . •�
_ �M
. � �� �`
1 -�
_ � �
N F, t-` �'.c
� ' - � g
'•- ��
� _ F i� `
� ` �('� e. ,` 1
�, �
r� .
-�- . --�
. . �- ,�.
� � �.r
� �+ � .
�[-s '„�:� t _ �,i
.1
N
n
n
r
m
z
1
N
z �
� �z
m �
m
� \\
�m1
�
0
C
-� n
„
=z
0
b � v
1n�
eW=
���
.�v�
zxc
�r�
m N Y
a
y � �
,T, {
�
n
�
�
C
�
N
D
��
z�
G7 m
O n
a�
�
�
3
n � � o m v
m �
� C C � m ❑
�� QW�-�-i
a { � � m �
W" ❑
�
m n y N
Y '�+ N �
� �
� �
rD
N �
a n � � 0 N
� � � � �
m m rrt m �
In] N
N N
IV N
N N
� �
Q Q
m m
N s
d D
1 �
v' u' r
Q a m
w a� �
m rn m
❑ v �
�
N N '
� �
v o
O Q
� �
N �
Z.Z
2 i 2
�1� --
� p r
� ���G� . �
:.
�
�
C7
a
r
rn
�
�
�
Lpy ProjeCt Np.
B-1 21-24892 Chapel Hii! Multifamiiy
5outh of Gibvlo Hills Parkway �
6oring Location R� N E
Fort Worth, Texas
Latitude Water Le�el nbservativns {feet) Oaie E N G I N E E R I N G
32.90$25° N While Qrillir�g Not Ohser�ed 1-'11-21
�vngitude At 6oring Campletion Nof Dhserved
9l•4142fl� W End of �ay Nof Measured = a' w
G IIl � t a
� ..d.. N a"' 9 0r O
L
'� p � _ � Y V d+-� Z '� .£ Ci 7j y�y
Q � � � S tra tum Descrip tivn J� ~ q= C e a J 3 e �_ _�
� - = U �
o y� F � w� � m� �,� y d ❑a
� W m a a m o46r r�'a a n 3 Z' c o
Approximate 5urface Ele�ation = 79fi.C1 feet �❑ w a ok o. ui �L-�L-PI � N o a c�
FAT CLAY (CHj - dark 4rvwn, with Ga�careaus
nodules
2.75 39
4.5+ g5 75-31 �4 24 92
- brown, tra�e gra�el
5 3.54 23
79D.�
LEAN CLAY {CLy - ian and brown, with sand and
g ravel
3.50 20
- with weathered limestane
787.0 3$-18-5DI2" 29 2$-16-12 7
VYEATHEFtE� �IM�S70NE - tan, with �lay
1
r
�
�
�
�
C
U
�
0
� � 50I'/„ 4
r 7$1.6
`0 1� LiMESTdNE - gray
`m
�
m
E
m
m
r
E
�
m
m
m
° 5aii�� � o
= 2 � ��s.o
� Bvring 7erminated at Approximately 2Q Feet
� Propnsed Ele�ation = 804.Q Feet
�, Approximate Grading = 8.0 Feet Fill
a
N
U
�
O
C
n
3
L
y
O1
O
01
C
� Malerial heundaries are a roximale: in siiu, lransiEions ma 6e radual.
w Driiler: 7p - 7yler
F Drilling Melhod: Continuvus Flight Augers Plate A.4
Log ProjeCt No.
B-2 21-24892 Chapel Hill Multifamily
Boring Locativn South of Cibola Hills Parkway
Fort Worth, Texas
La[itude Water Le�el Qbse�vatinnS [feet} Da[e
32.94T89° N While �rilling Nvt Dbserved 9-1T-2
�ongitude At 6oring Completion Not Obser�ed
97.44974° W End of aay Not Measured
a � c
� o F c � Q v
a�°� ° S#ratum �escription � z :
41 T R- 7 q1 tl� O
� y N uj ;� � a
Approximate 5urface Elevatipn =$Q0.0 feet Tr p rrt
5
FAT CLAY (CHj - brown, with �alcareous nodules
SEVERELY WEATHEREO LiMEST�IVE - tan, with
clay
FAT CLAY (CH] - dark brown, with calcareous
nodules and gravek
30-19-5015"
8-11-14
N-25
- tan
m
�
_
m
y 1
`a
m
�
c
�
E
m
m
L
Gn
C
C
.�
�
�
�
m
�
N
�
8
�
0
_
�
7
❑
L
N
- tan, trace eaicarevus deposits and weathered
limestane
Boring Terminated at Approximately 2D Feet
Propased Elevatian = 8�3.� Feet
Approximate Gradi�g = 3.0 Feet Fill
14- 7 5-30
N=45
sor��<°�
5D!'/<"
JU� /9 �I
�0��I4
,
R�NE
E N G I N E E R I N G
w
' a w
w
o y � t},
v ar
� e� m "� _ °i =
d r a � U m m'w
E � m� d � ��
� o� rn� �r � . +.: m
C Z n a � o = C L
�
C � fwA � N m [�7 �
a� a in LL-PL-PI � a'� o � v
4.5+ 56 71-33-38 18
78 38-17-19 5
22
3.5a I 64 I 7�-3D�0 I 15 � O.fl I 81
17
�, Driller: Tb - Tyler
F prilling Methad: Continuvus Flight Augers P[ate A..r]
Log Praject No.
6-3 21-24892 Chapel Hill Multifamily
Boring Location South af Cibvlv Hills Parkway �� ��
Fort Worth, Texas
�a�itude Water Lerrel �hservations {feet3 tiate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.90789� AI While Drilling Not �bserved 1-'[7-�1
Longitude At Boring Completion Afot Observed e �
97.40974° W End of day Not Measured Q y
o � " a
P � �d„ t
m fA N d y C � C
T � pl = G. �' N D �� p j .a o
$ a� o m"' [] E" Z °' � m } c w
a� a� Stratum �escription � z � o � � o a�' , o•L =�
m h � m « r°tn o m� 'w ; w � � q a
a N W Approximate 5urface Ele�ativn = 804.0 feet � a ran a� a'v� LL-PL•PI � en G � c i
LEAN CLAY (CLj - E�rown, tra�e cal�areous nodules
and gravel
4.5+ 21
- wiih tan, with �alcareous deposits
4.5+ 56 49-23-25 8
5 j 4.5+ 9
- with weathered limestone
4.5+ 11
795.5 21-5Dl6" 82 49-19-3D 11
INEATHER�� UM�STdNE - tan
�
r
n
m
� 791.0
� LIMESTONE - gray
m
0
� � 501'/z'
L 5fl1'/."
w 1
❑
�
-�
m
E
m
r
E
0
a
d
R
`m
d � 50I'/a��
� � 784.0 5D1'/a"
� Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet
� Propased Elevation = 806.0 Feet
m Appraximate Grading =�.0 Feet Fifl
d
a
N
U
�
d
G
U
�
i
N
C71
O
�1
C
� Maleria3 boundaries are a mximale; in situ, transilions ma be radual.
y Drilier: T� - Ni�k
�❑rilling Methad: Cantin�ous Flight Augers Plate A.s
Log Prvje�t No.
B-4 21-�4892 Chapel Hill Multifamily
Bpring Loca[ion South of Cihola Hills Parkway �� ��
Fart Wvrth, Texas
[_atitude Water Le�el Observations {feet} oate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.907$9° N While Drilling Not 06seroed 1-'17-21
E.on9itude At Boring Campletion Not OE�served � �
97.449T4° W End af day Not Measured � a y
O � d L Q
� N OI
Y w m
y � C . C
a � U } mw
� � F 0 � i+ F � w Z GI .� Q y G N
Q � a �;� Stratum Descript�on z � � � J � � �
� ` �� _' a Y ' _ =Q
0�� � °i� � ce�a an� y m 7 caiE
N W '�� a m m ro°1 �0 3 �' e o
Appraximate 5urface Elevatian = 866.0 ieet �r fl rn a� a rr� LL-PL-PI � u� a � U
I.EAN CLAY �CLj - tan, with calcareous deposits and
gravel
4.5+ 72 42-23-19 18
80A.0
FAT CLAY (CFE} - tan and brown, with cafcarevus
nodules and gra�el
4.5+ 1 �
5 4.5+ 87 59-22-37 14
800.0
LEAN CLAY �CL] - tan, with gra�el and weathered
limestone 18-15-1 p � 2
N=25
4.5+ � 8
1
�
a
m
R
L]
_
L]
a 4.00 81 41-18-23 16
rn
L
� 1
m
�
�
E
m
r
0 788.D
,� WEATHERED LIMESTONE - gray
d
m
`m
d 5DI'/�' S
N � 786.fl 5DIY��
a 2 Bvring Terminated at Appraximately 2D Feet
� Proposed Elevation = 808.a Feet
� Appraximate Grading = 2.Q Feet Fill
d
a
N
D
U
�
0
c
�
�
r
N
tl1
O
�
� Material 6oundaries are a mximale: in silu. Iransitians ma be radual.
� Driller: T� - Nick Plate A.%
F❑rilling Method: Continuvus Flight Augers
Log Prqe�t Na.
g_�j ��_24g92 C#�apel Hill Multifamify
BoringLocation South of Cibolo Hills Parkway r
Fort Wor#h, Texas R� N E
Latitude Water Le�el Observatians tfeetj oate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.9�T$9° N While Drilling Not Dbserved �-17-21
Longitude At Soring Corr�pletion Not Observed � �
91.4D974' W End of Day Not Measured o = a �
c a, d s
y y � [V � y � a7 �
T � C� C � �' � � �. U m � C
� O C Q d y � � Q� N
r E ° ° 5tratum ❑escri ptivn � �� � � � � e a J ; � �_ _ �
Q T Q i 6 C y — 7 p Q-
� �/j � � 0i d 61 � y a y �
� N � Approximate Surface �le�ation = 798.� feet � O v�i a� a in LL-PL-PI � v3i � � U
LEAh! CLAY �CLj - hrown, with tan, with sand and
gra�el
4.�0 25
4.5+ 91 46-2t-25 12 O.Q 124
- with ca�careous deposits
� 793. Q 3�? 48 3 4B 7
WEATHERED LINIESTflNE - tan, with clay
� 5011"
�
�ai�r��
r
a
m
� 7$5.fl
L LIMEST�NE - gray
m
a
a+ � 5fl!%z"
L 5ff1%'.
w 1
a
`m
c
�
£
�'
i
£
�
m
m
m
� � sarr<�
�' ��s.a sor��<°
a 2 Bvring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet
@ Proposed Elevation = 8Q2.0 Feet
m Approximate Grading = 4.fl Feet Fill
a
N
8
�
0
c
n
3
�
NQ�
Q
�1
C
�o i�Aaleriaf 6oundaries are a roximaSe; in situ, lransilions ma 6e radual.
� arillef: TD - Tyler Plate A.8
� brilling Method: Continuvus Flight Augers
Log Praiect Mo.
8-fi 2'I-24892 Chapel Hili Muitifamily
Haing Loca[ion 5ou#h of Cibvlv Hills Parkway 'r
Fort Worth, Texas R� N E
Latktude Water Le�el Dbservations [feetj �ate E N G I N E� R I iV G
32.9flT$9° N While Drilling Nat Dbserved 1-17-21
�on9itude At 6oring Completipn Nat Ohsen+ed r.
97.4d974� W End vf bay iVot Measured �- � y
C
O � d L Q
61
T� �c � wY a �Y o m �o
� F a �° Stratum Descrip#ion ° � a £ °' � � a � � � = a
a � q= tn� � o = ,«, �
d y� � m� mv 'N� ;� — � oL
� N W '6 � a d m �.a �0 3 �' � a
Approximale 5urfa�e Ele�ation =$OA.O feet � d uf a� a ui LL-PL-PI � u� ❑ � u
FAT CI.AY (CHj - brown, with tan, with cal�areous
depvsits and gra�el
4.00 30
4.5+ 85 60-25-35 19
- tan, wit#� weathered limestone
5 4.5+ 1 S
798.4
LFr4i�l CLAY �C�} - tan, with caf�areous depasits and
weathered �imestone 17-26-17 47 35-18-18 9
N=43
- with gray
� i 4.5t 2fi
1
r
�
m
m
U
C
f.1
� 4.OQ 18
�,
�
� 15
0
�
�
�
E
°1 787.0
� WEATHERED LIMESTONE - gray
E
0
v
m
m
ro
,�, � 501'/z'
� 784.� 5�1'/„
n 2 Boring Terminated at Approximately 2D Feef
a Propased Ele�atian = $p8.0 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 4.0 Feet Fil]
�
N
C]
Q
d
C
�
�
L
N
Ql
Q
Ql
C
�o Materiak boundsries are a roximate; in silu lransilions ma he radual.
a❑riller: TD - Nick Plate A.9
F Driping Method: Continuaus Flight Augers
Log Prqe�t Na.
6-7 21-24892 Chapel Hill Nfultifamily
HaringLocation Svuth vf Cibolo Hills Parkway �
Fort Worth, Texas R� N E
Latitude Water Le�ei �bservations {feetj �ate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.90789` N While orilling Not Dbserved 1-17-21
�ongitude At Boring Cpmpletion Not Ohserved o �
97.40974° W End o# �ay Not Measured o = '� �
P � r .�
GI tA Y N �� C � �
� O T = � O � � y d � ._ U � � D
� ~ O m �' � � m � ` C (Nq
�� d Straium Description � z � ��� e Q J w a � ��
� 7+ a� mm p mv .�n°1 N — � oa
� N W �� a m m R d �n 3 �' e v
Approximate Surtace Ele�ation = 805.0 feet � O rn a� a rn LL-PL-PI � v� ❑ � c�
LEAN CLAY (CLj - brown, with calcarsous nvdules
4.5+ 74 44-24-20 2Q �2 95
J
- tan, with caEcareaus deposits and weathered
limestane
4.5+ 10
5 ` 4.5+ 7 5
/
/
4.5f 12
27-26-19 73 38-21-1 T 13
N=45
1
0 793.D
� FAT CLAY [CHj - brown and light gray
�
�
C
(�]
m 4.5+ 9$ 63-28-35 24 104 3.820
o�
� 79a.a
a � LIMESTQNE - gr�y
`m
c
ro
£
m
�
£
Q
m
m
�
R �or�4 �
N � 785.0 S�IYa'
a Z Boring Terminated at Appraximately 2p �eet
a Proposed Ele�ativn = 8p6.� Feet
d Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Fill
`w
a
N
8
.�
0
�
�
�
�
N�!
❑
�
C
�o Malerial houndanes are a roximale; in situ, transitions ma 6e radual.
9 Driiler: TO - Nick PEate A.� 0
� arilling Methvd: Continuous Fiight Augers
Log Project Na.
B-8 21-24892 Chapel Hilf Multifamify
BoringLvr.ation 5outh of Cibal❑ Hills Parkway '
Fort Worth, Texas R�� E
Latitude Wafer Le�el fli�servations {feet) Date E N G! N E E R! N G
�2.��7$g� i� Whiie �rilling Wpt �bS�fVOti ���i7�2�
Longitude At Boring Completion Not Obser�ed - �
97.�4�974° W End of Day IVot Measured � a �
a rn r r Q'
Q x N �� N y N C Q7 G
'� G H C 7 i+ Ci ��' �' m.€ V � Gl N
a � Q � Stratum Description `� ~ �� C o a J � e = _ �
� y � 7 y W � tl� a N� � y � v�
� y � Approximate Surfa�e E]e�ation = 860.6 feet �r p r�n �� a in LL-PL-PI � v3i a � t�i
LEAN CLAY {CL] - brown, with cal�areous nodules
and �alcareous deposits
4.5+ 7p 46-25-2'E 23 84
- tan
4.5+ 14
5 45.06 12
793_0 16-11-12 10
M=23
FAT CLAY jCHj - tan and iighi gray, with calcareous
nadules and weathered limestone
4.5+ 81 15
1
0 788.Q
� LEMESTONE - gray
�
U
�C
U
N
O
� � FJ�n�ry�4 �
r �Vl�4�
w 15
0
�
�
�
E
�
t
�
Q
�
m
�
m
� � 5�!'/i'
N 780A 501'/��
� 2 8oring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet
� Propased Elevation = 801.4 Feet
d Approximate Carading = 1.p Fovt Fill
d
�
�
$
Q
0
c
a
a
0
N
�
Ol
C
'o Material houndanes are a raximate� in siW. lransilions ma be raduai.
N❑riller: TQ - Nick Plate A. ��
F Drilling Methad: Continuo�s Flight Augers
Log Project No.
B-9 21-24$92 Chapel Hill BAultifamily
BpringLoca[ian South of Cibalo Hills Parkway f
Fort Wvrth, Texas F� � N E
Laiikude Water Level �bsen+atians jfeetj oate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.90789' N While arilling Nvt Qbserved 1-17-21
Longitude At Baring Completion Not �bserved
97.�LIi�74° W �nd of Day f�ot Measured = a H
m ,�
a
0Y N N m Y G � G
p � � p1 � �'1' m a.y+ � � � Li � d N
$ 7•— L] .Z QI � c y
� � � �° 5tratum Descrip#ion � � L � � � e Q J ' ; a �_ _ �
m y E a Ya� ° m'ts w7 � N m uE
� � � �s a m d R�' �a 3 �• e a
Appraximate SurFace �le�ativn = 796.a feet � p rrt a� a us LL-PL-PI � v� o � ti
FAT CLAY (CHJ - brvwn, with cal�areous nodules and
gra�el
4.5+ 92 67-27-40 23 94
794.�
LEAN CLAY jCLy - tan, with weathered limestone
26-25-31 i$ 46-21-25 3
N=Sfi
792.0
� WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan 5011'/4'
501'/" 7
5
� 5D12"
5011 Y<"
1
r
¢
�
g 783.a
� I.IMESTQNE - gr�y
d
0
rn � 5�1'/��
� 501'/,"
� 15
�
�
m
E
�
.c
E
�
d
�
`m
� �01'/z"
� � T76. Q 501'/<��
�� 6oring ierminated at Approximatefy 2D Feet
� �roposed Ele�ation = T98.� Feet
� Approximate Grading = 2.fl Feet Fill
d
a
c
a
A
a
C
�
3
L
N
�
61
C
`v
Material 6aundaries are a roximate� in siEu Vansilions ma l�e radual.
w ❑�I��Bf: �� - �+11C�C
� �rilfing Methad: Continuous Fiight Augers Plate A.� 2
Log Project No.
8-10 21-24892 Chapel Hilf Multifamily
Boring LvCation 5vuth vf Cibolo Hills Parkway '
Fort Worth, Texas � � � E
l.atitude Water Le�el flhser►�ativns �feet} Date E IV G I N E E R]!4 G
32.9Q805° N While Qnlling Not �bserved 1-1?-21
�angitude At Boring Campletian A4ot abserved e �
9T.412fi0° W End of oay Nnt Measured = '�' H
�
a
� N � � CI
Q � � a �- Q � � p 'pf � O
$ � T p y O V �� � s4d+ � N � C N
H
� F m Stratum Description �� � q�� o Q-' , a •� = m
a a Q ea o �._ .. _ a
m � q
d y� a md wv 'y� m d y�
� y W �� a mm a°' fl 3 �' eo
Approximate 5urtace Ele�ation = 797A feet �� v� a� a rn LL-PL•PI � w ❑ � c�
FAT CLAY (CH) - brown, with weathered €imestone
4.5+ 36 53-28-25 13 77
4.5+ 14
793.0
WEA7HERED LI�hIlESTONE - tan, with clay
15-1p-38 47_ 27-16-11 7
r� N=AB
� 5L6n11'/2'
JV�3�4 �
� JL�l�4� 9
J�� I i�
1
r
$
�
� 784.0
L LIMEST�NE - gray
m
0
d � 50I'/a��
w 15
0
d
a
.�
E
�'
r
�
Q
m
ro
m � 5ff1%"
�- � 777.0 5Q1'/+��
� Baring Terminated at Apprvximately 2D Feet
� Proposed Eie�ation = 796.0 Feet
d Apprvximate Grading = 1.D Faat Cut
m
�
�
$
a
0
G
a
�
L
N
OI
D
vl
C
'o Malerial houndaries are a ximale; in situ, Vansitions ma be radual.
N ❑riller: TD - Nick
F Orilling Method: Continuo�s Flight Augers Pta�e A.� 3
Log Project fVo.
B.�'I Z�_Z4gg2 Chapel Hill Multifamily
Soring Location Sauth of Cibolo Hi Ils Paricway R� N E
Fort Worth, Texas
�atitude Water Le�el Observations {feet] ��e E N G I N E E R! N G
3�.9fl8�5° N WhEle �rilling Nat Dbserved 1-142'f
l.an9itude At 6aring Completian Nat Dbserved � �
97•412fi0� w End of Day Not Measured � °' y
o rn �! t Q'
O7 py � � d Y = � C
T $ y C a ''�' N C O tl7 -a G
$ � ~ _ � +% � � Y Z � '� U � C N
Q� a � Stratum Description � z : ��= e a J ; e�� ��
a�' 7 `m� ° m� 'w°7 w � �a'
N N Iij i6� d m m emu y �a 3 �' s o
Approximate Surface Elevation = 786.0 feet �r p v� a a a rn LL-PL-PI � u� o � c�
LEAN CLAY �CL} - dark brown, with gra�el and
�alcareous nodules
4.5+ 78 48-23-25 22 �.7 99
4.5+ 15
782.0
WEATHERE� LIMEST�HE - tan
9-16-48 gq 36-15-15 7
5 N=64
77�.a
LIMESTaNE - tan �q����
� ' Sfl11"
1
0 774.p
� LIMESTqNE - gray
�
a
.�
U
N
O
� � 5D1'/2"
� 5DI'/."
� �
a
`m
p
�
�
d
�
E
d
�
N
�6
`m
� � 501'/<"
� 2 766.� 50I'I<"
� Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet
� Praposed Ele�ation = 790.0 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 4,0 Feet Fill
`m
�
.N
a
U
9
0
c
a
0
�
N
Ol
O
�
aMaterial houndaries are a roximate; in siiu, transi;ions ma ba radual.
N Driller: T� - Jose Pla#e A.� 4
� ❑rilling A+lethod: Continuous Flight Augers
Lag Projeot f+lo.
B.�2 ��_Z48g� Chapel Hill Multifamily
Boring Location 5outh af Cihvl❑ Hills Parkway �� ��
For# Worth, Texas
�atitude Water Le�el Observations �feetj aate E N G I N E E R 1 N G
32.9a811° N Wnile Driuing Nat �bserved 1-1421
LongitutJe At Boring Campletipn Not Observed e �
9T.41334� W End of Qay Not Measured � a n
a rn r � �
L N � CI
61 r� y� C , C
R� � C a .m.� � O � Y}P
� F D m.. '� F U m in
� � � � 5tratum Description � �� � � � � � a J ; p '_ = a
m '� n � m ° m a'on m w � a
�� N W �a a maf°i md �0 3 2' co
Approximate SurFace Ele�ation = 797.0 feet � O u� a� a N LL-PL-�I � rn ❑ 3[t
CLAYEY GRAVEL �GC] - dark brown
4.5t 26 58-27-31 12 -D.2 76
7-9-15 $
N=24
793.0
LEAN CLAY (CL} - tan and orange-6rown, with gra�el
6-16-37 87 27-14-13 10
5 N=27
7-9-15 .� 9
N=24
78$.0
4VEATHERED LIMEST�NE - tan
7-5�I5" 94 58-23-33 20
1
a 785.0
; LIhAEST0IVE - gray
�
U
c
v
m
a
v� � 5Q1'/a��
r 5QI'I2'
� 15
0
m
a
�
E
�
t
E
0
t7
m
m
Q- 501%:"
N � 777.Q 50!'/z"
�� Boring 'ierminated at Approximately 2p Feet
� Pro�ased Ele�ativn = 794.Q Feet
� Approximate Grading = 3.6 Feet Cut
�
g
�N
U
P
0
�
�
�
t
N
01
O
b1
C
Maleflal 6Ou�ld2rie8 ar9 8 rUximate: in situ, transitions lITB CC f8dual.
0
N DrilEer; TQ - Jase Plate A. ��
� Qriliing Method: Cantinuous FEight Augers
Log Project Nv.
B-'I3 2'I-24892 Chapel Hill Multifamily
Baring Lacatian 5auth of C i bv I o H i I Is Parkway '�
Fori Worth, Texas R� N E
Latitude Water Le�el Observations [feet} oate E N G I N E E R! N G
32.90$�5° N While Orillkng Not observed 1-1421
Longitude At Boring Gampletian Not �bserved
9T.41260° W End af Day Nvt Measured = °' m
o vi ;� s a
� $ N 3� � � �I +w.' _ � C
T W C d N O O 01 � O
� Q ~ D 61 w H �� Z m� N � C N
�� m 5tratum Descrip#ion � z � q== e Q� , e == a
d � � ' Y °' ° °'� ��; � d � ° �
o '� W Approximate Surtace Elevation = 801.a feet � O rai� a� a in LL-PL•PI � v3i o a r i
GRAVELLY FAT CLAY {Gi-i} - daris brown
a 4.5+ $6 89-26-55 24
799.5 25-5012" 15 3
WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, with cfay layers
9-28-34 13
�v=sz
�
34-5fl15" 71 28-14-34 10
793.5
LIMESTONE - gray
� 50f'/<"
5D1'/2'
1
r
Q
m
c�
LG
L]
�
� � �oi�iz �
L �o��r,°
,s 15
�
�
�
E
�
�
E
�
d
m
`m
,a, � 501'/z'
� 781.a 501'/.,�
�� Boring �arminafed at Apprvximately 2D Feet
� Proposed Elevativn = SOQ.6 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 1.Q Foat Cut
�
a
C
U
P
O
C
�
�
L
N
01
O
01
C
'o Material boundaries a�e a roximale; in silu, iransilions ma 6e radual.
N �rillsr: TD - Jose
� Qriiling Nlethod: Continuvus Flight Augers Plate A.� ei
Log Projec[ Na.
B-'l4 �1-24892 Chapel Hill IVlult�family
Boring Location South of Cihvl� HIII5 P8CkW2ly F
Fort Worth, Texas � � � E
Latitude Water Le�el Ohservations {feet} ��e E N G I N E E R I N G
32.9Q8�5° N While qrilling Not Observed 1-1421
�ongitude At Baring Completion Nat Qbserved � �
97•41Zfi�� W End of aay Not Measured � a �
a rn ;� t Q'
Q1 N y N � M C � C
Q' � � d N G C ❑ �tl� -a 9
� a � C � a � � � � m G � ��„ C I�A
�� m° 5tratum Description � z ~ Q�� o a J ; e�� ��
Q N � m � N F- C R N� N m � v E
y W '�� a dd �O7 �0 3 Z' =o
Appraximate Surface Elevation = 8QO.Q feet �� ui a� � vi LL-PL-PI � v� o � t�
GRAVELLY FAT CLAY {CH} - dark brown
0
4.5+ 67 76-34�2 25 1.5 76
798.0
WEATHEREQ LIMEST�NE - tan, with �lay layers
46-5Q15" 12 2
i-9-5015" 12
5
23-16-15 g4 36-1$-18 �ff
N=31
792.4
LIMESiQNE - gr2y
� 54IYz'
501'/z'
1
r
a
m
m
0
C
�
O
01 � 5Q1����
� 5Q1 �I �i
� 1
❑
`m
�
.�
E
�'
�
E
0
a
m
m
ro
a 5�1'/a"
" � �so.a �0���4 �
�� 6oring Terminated at Approxirr�atefy 20 Feet
� Proposed Elevation = 799.0 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 9.fl Fvot Cut
�
a
Co
U
�
O
C
77
�
i
N
[71
❑
Q1
C
-o Malerial bourWaries are a rnximate� in silu. transilions ma be radual.
N Driller: Td - Jose
F❑rill'rng Methvd: Continuaus Fllght Augers Plate A.� 7
Log Project IVo.
B-'15 21-24892 Chapel Hill Multifamily
Boring Location 5outh of Cibvlv Hills Parkway R� N E
Fort Worth, Texas
[_a�itude Water Le�el �bservations {feetj Dase E N G I N E E R I N G
32.908�5° N While i]rrlling Not ��sen+ed 1-1421
Lorrgitude At 6oring Completion Nat flbserved e �
�7•4'1284� W End vf bay Not Measured = Q' n
o � � �
07 y � � C � G
C. � G � " N O "� O 6t 9
� �
� ° 7" r � Y U O7 '- Z y•E � � uyi
F
Y � � ° Stratum Descr�ptian � � : � � � o a =� ; o •_ � �
y� �' Q' 7 y y p p� �•y � ip _' � O C'
� N N W �.n n~. d a R d �e 3 �' � o
Approximate Surface Elevation = 8fl0.fl feet �S ❑ rn a� a�n LL-P�-PI � rrr ❑ � c�
FAT CI.AY �CHy - dark brawn, with weathered
iimestane
4.5+ 8D fi9-31-38 22 3.3 101
798.Q
WEATFfERED LIMEST�NE - tan, with clay layers
4.5+ 20 4fi-P1-�5 7 2.3 94
38-32-5fl14" 45 26-95-11 B
5
� 50!'/<" 4
so���<�
791 A
LIM�ST�NE - gray 18-50I3" 11
1
z
a
m
m
ca
'c
U
N
P
� � �JO���z �
r so���<�
� 15
0
`m
C
�
G
G]
�
w
�
P
a
N
�
�
y � �fl^���'�
N V VV-L �V��I4�
� 2 Bvring 7erminated at Approximately 2Q Feet
� Proposed Ele�ation = 800.0 Feet
o Appraximate Grading = �.fl Feet Fi41
m
�o
c
c�
n
0
C
�
�
i
�
rn
0
rn
c
'tl Malenal 6oundaries are a mximale; in situ. transitians m 4a �adual.
a pnller' T� - Jvse
F Qrilling Msthod: Continuvus Flight Augers Plate A.� �
Log Project hlo.
B-1S 21-24892 Chapel Hil! Multi�amily �
/
8oring Lxatian 5outh of Cihola Hills Parkway R� �y E
Fort Worth, Texas
Lasitude Water Le�el d6servations (feet} �at� E N G I N E E R I N G
32.9a805° N While []rilling Not �bserved 9-1421
�ongitude At Boring Compietion Naf �hserved e �
97.412fia° W End of I�ay I�ot Measured o � a a
� s
T� da a m� � �Y o 'm .ac
� o r = a�, t� � s d� U � d w
� � m ° 5tratum Description � z ~ � _ � o Q � ; � _ _ �
0
� N E � .d. N F^ C m oyi� � N � � Cp.t E
a y W �a a m m R d o 3 Z' e a
Approximate Surface Elevation = 803.0 feet �� w a� a u� LL-Pk-PI � u� o � U
FAT CLAY (�H) - dark brvwn, with calcareous
nodules and weathered limestone
4.5+ 84 7fi-32-44 28 0.9 91
4.5+ 1 �
- with tan
798.0
5 WEA7HERE0 LIMESTONE - tan, with orange-brown, � Nj 3� � 71 49-21-28 $
with clay layers
5�15" '� 1
795.a
LIMESTONE - tan
� 501'/z'
5�I'/�'
1
r
a
�
m
U
C
U
N
D r
� ��f ��7 �
� � 788.6 5�1'I���
o � 5 LIMESTONE - gray
a�
�
�
�
m
�
E
2
�
�
a 501'/� �.
�' � 783.0 SQIYa"
° 2 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet
� Prvpvsed Elevation = 802.a Feet
� Appraximate Grading = 1.D Foot Cut
a
N
�i
Q
O
C
a
�
r
N
�
W
C
a
Matenal 6oundaries are a roximaSe: in situ, transilions ma he radual.
9❑rilfer: TD - Jose Ptate A.� 9
� Orilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers
Log Project I+lo.
B-17 21-24892 Chapel Hill Multifamiiy
BpringLor,2tipn South vf Ciholo Hills Parkway �
Fart Worth, �exas R� N E
Lalitude Water Le�el �bservat[ans [feet} Date E N G t N E E R I N G
32.9�$05° N While Drilling Nat �hser�ed 1-1421
Longitude At Bvnng Completion Not Observed ,
97.412fi0° W End of pay Not iNeasured � C a �
6 OI d L
61 y y N y Y C � C
Q � � � N O �.� O W � O
T � c w
� F 4 m.. � J L1 m m
� � a � 5traium Description ��z � � _ _� a ; � � c �
o'' a a, m ° m�cr 'w °i w � o n'
� N� "� a mm �d o 3 �' �o
Approximate SurEace Ele�ativn = 8p$.0 feet � p �n a� a. cn LL-PL-P! � rn a � c�
FAT CLAY (CHj - dark brown
3.0� 39
- with calcarenus nodules
4,5+ 86 81-34--07 2� 2.3 94
8Q4. fl
� LFAIJ CLAY (CL] - tan, with calcareous nadules and 4�� 12
/,- weathered limestone
9-7'9 19
N=15
9-18-20 88 32-19-13 16
N=3$
1
r
a
m
� 796.D
i 1NEATHERECI LIMEST�NE -1an
m
0
ci � 5D1'/z"
r �ori��
w 15
a
d
c
.@
E
�'
t
E
Q
�
m
`w
a 501%z"
�' �?89.0 501'/d'
a 2 Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet
ro Proposed Ele�ation = 8Q9.0 Feet
m Apprvximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill
�
N
8
�
s
�
�
�
�
N
�
�
C
-o Material houndanes are a roximale; in situ, transitians ma be raduaf,
� ❑riller: T�-Jose Plate A.�Q
� Drilling {Nethvd.- Cvntinuous Flight Augers
Log Proje�t No.
B-'�$ 21-24892 Chapel Hill Muftifamiiy
Baring Location 5auth af Cibvl❑ Hills Parkway r
Fort Worth, T�xas � � � E
Latltude Water Le�el pbsen+atinns �feet] �ate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.908fl5° N While orilling Nat Dhserved 1-1421
�onqitude At 8oring Complefion Not dbserved e �
97.41260� W End pf �ay Not Measured = � n
i N � ..+ � �
� �
� p F C � 0 V d Y � d� V � ro�u9
+L' � w � Stratum �es�riptian J � ~ � _ � e Q J = o '� � d
Q �, G, m ❑ � q _ � b a
d iI1 � 7 w p1 m"b 'N 7 . 01 u�
� N �j ma a mm �d o 3 �' =o
Apprvximate Surfa�e Ele�ativn = 803.fl feet � p r� a� a v� LL-PL-P! � rn ❑ � ca
FAT CLAY (CH] - dark brown, trace gra�el
4.5Q 88 73-28-44 28 6.5 90
- with cal�areous nodules
4.5+ 12
799.0
LEAN CLAY (CLj - tan, with gra�ef and weathered
limestone
5 10-16-10 88 29-17-12 1�
N=20
797.D
CLAYEY GRAVEL jGC] - tan
4.5+ 49 44-20-24 10 O.fi 121 9,7Q0
4.5+ 23
1
�
a
�
�
U
.�
U
� 4.5+ 52 56-23-33 14
rn
� 788.Q
a � WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, wikh clay layers
d
a
m
E
�
r
E
�
d
�o
m
a 5fl1%'
�' � 783.0 54I'/,��
� 2 Boring Terminated at Approximately 2D Feat
� Propvsed Ele�ation = 803.0 Feet
� Approximate Grading = Q.D Feet Fill
m
c
Ca
U
Q
❑
C
a
�
L
N
O1
❑
O1
C
'C Material 6oundaries are a roximate: in silu.lransitions ma P79 fBdUTI.
0
N Rri�ler: T� - Jose Pfate A.2�
� �rilling Method: Continuvus �light Augers
Log Project No.
B,_�� ��.24gg2 Chapel Hill Multifamily
Boring LpCation 5auth vf Ciholv Hills Parkway r
Fort Worth, Texas � � � E
�atitude Water Le�el bhservativns {feetj �ate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.9fl771° N While Drilling Not Obser�ed 1-1421
Langitude At Boring Complelion Not d6served e �
9i.41 a79° W End vf �ay �Eot Measured � a w
o rn :� � Q'
� N d � ar
$ o F � d o a �, w ° ,Q • ° � �'°
� O G�1 �' U � � Q1 � d C N
� � � Stratum Description � z � � _ �e Q-' ; o •_ � �
� 7, a � v m � o°-
w N E a �,w m�a 'w� y � uE
� y W �� a m m ��' n 3 �' e o
Approximate 5urface Elevation = 819.0 feet }i � ur a� a u� LL-PL-PE � u� G ��
LEAN CL.AY (CL} - brawn, with C81Carevus nadules
and weathered limestone
4.50 3�
�
4,5� 76 45-22-23 17 Q.6 167
/
- with gravel
4.5+ � 9
5
813.� 21-15-12 63 28-17-11 8
N=27
WEATHERED LIMESTaNE - tan, with clay layers
4.5Q 15
5015" 9 3
1
�
°a.
d
� sas.a
r FAT CLAY (CH} - tan, trace gravel zones
d
� 4.5+ 97 69-28�1 30 96 5.28�
�
r
w i
❑
d
a
�
�
N
L
G
�
N
m 4.5+ 20
4
N
� z 7�s.a
a Boring Terminated at Approximately 2Q Feet
� Prvposed Ele�ation = 819.6 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill
�
N
❑
a
O
C
a
�
L
N
�
�1
C
-o Malerial boundaries are a roximate; in situ, transilions ma he �adual.
N Driller: T� - Nick Plate A.2�
F arifling Method: Continuous Flight Augers
Log Projec[ No.
B-ZQ 21-24892 Chap�l Hill Multifamily
Bvring Locatian Sauth of Cibola Hills Raricway f
Fort Worth, Texas R�� E
�atitude Vllater Le�el �bservations tfeet} bate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.9{l$05° N While Drilling Not D6served 1-74-21
Longitude At Bpring Completion Not Observed e �
9T.412$D° W End af bay Nvt Measured a �
c
o rn a; t
� �' y Y� M d+y' _ � C
� �+ m c a �, w a � ._ ❑ °' -° •°
�° r o ro" F � a °'� v � cv`n,
a � a i6 Stratum �escription �"� O � C C� Q J 7 ° �C � a
Ct N � 7 M Qt 61 � �N � N y = � E
� � �y 19 � a m oi°i � a ❑ 3 Z' e a
Approximate SurFa�e Ele�atian = 821.0 feet �� tn a� a w l.L-PL-PI � rrr ❑ � cs
CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC} - brown, with calcarevus
nadules
4.5+ C7 85-37-48 21 1.2 86
- with tan
4.5+ 21
21-19-14 7
5 N=33
- �ery dense
815.Q
FAT CiAY (Clij - tan, with gra�el
4,5+ 84 53-21-32 14 1.D 111
19-5014" 77 4$-2ff-25 18
i $��.a
WEATHERED LIMESTbNE - tan, with clay fayers
r
°�
m
�
a
'e
U
N
� �J{}�5���
L � 5V��7 �
w �5
❑
m
C
�
�
N
t
�
d
V
@ 8{�2.{�
a � LIMESTbNE - gray 5Q1'/"
� 2 801.fl 541%„
� 8vring 7erminated at Appraximately 2p �eet
� Propqsed Ele�ativn = $20.0 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 1.0 Foot Cut
d
a
�Vl
U
�
0
C
�
�
L
N
bl
O
C71
C
'o Material houndaries are a roximate: in situ, [rensilions ma be �adual.
N priller: Tp - IVick
F❑rilling Method: Continuvus Fkight Augers Plate A.23
Log Project Nv.
B-�1 21-24$92 Chapel Hill Multifamily
�
s�,-;�s ��t;on South of Cibolo Hills Parkway R� � E
Fart Worth, Texas
�atitude Water Level 06sen+atians jfeet} oate E N G 1 N E E R i hE G
32.908Q5° N While arilling Nvt �bserved 1-1421
Longitude At Bvring Completion Not �bserved v �
37,412fiU° W End of day Not Measured � Q' K
v � � a
a � c a :' r�n C ��' ° p� -a v
� C) � d H
O H C 7� U �" 2 a1 � d C N
� O J iti F" q C = o � J ao ,� • `
� T a �; Stratum Des�riptian d� G q�j �3 N m a y � � p�
� N y� R� a ma16i R� �e 3 �' cc
Appraximate Surface Ele�ation = 815.0 feet � O w a� a rn LL-PL-PI � cn ❑ � cs
FAT CLAY (CHJ -�rown, wlth �alcareous nodufes and
gra�el 4.5+ 61 57-26-31 18
18-12-8 32 3fi-21-15 9
813.ff N=2p
CLAYEY GRAVEL {GCJ - tan
811 _p 32-23-56I4" 8
WEATHERE� LIMESTONE - tan, with clay layers
5
� 5011" � .�
56f�/"
� 50l1"
501'/z"
1
0 8D3.fl
� LIMESTpNE - gray
�
�
�C
V
d
O
� �Ola�4
_ � 5D!'/2'
w 1
0
m
a
@
E
m
r
�
0
�
m
�
a 5a�i��
`� � 795.Q 5ff1'/."
�� Bvring Terminated at Approximately 2D Feet
7 Praposed Elevation = 80fi.0 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 9.0 �eet Cut
m
a
N
U
9
O
G
V
�
N
�
�
C
'a Material 6aundaries are a mximale; in situ, lransilions 6e radual.
N Qrilker: TQ - Nick
�❑rilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers Plate A.24
Log Project No.
B-2� 21-2489Z Chapef Hill Multifamily
go�;�g ���;�, 5outh �f Cibvlo Hills Parkway `
Fort Wvrth, Texas � � � E
Latilude Water LeVel Ok]servations �feety Qate E N G I N E E R E N G
32.9U8D5° N While Rrilling Not Obsen+ed 1-1421
Lonyitude At Bor'tng Completion Not Observed � �
g7.41 �6a' W End of Qay Nvl Nteasured � a w
� rn ;; t Q'
G1 N Y N d N C � C
� � ~ _ � � U E � � � � � � C N
Q � � � Stratum �escripti�n �'� O Q[ C a a J j v �_ _�
Q N E R�1 d V7 F" C� N� N � v�
'� � Approximafe 5urface Elevatian = 815.0 feet � O rn a� a cn LL-PL-PI � r3n o � u
GRAVELLY FAT CLAY [CHy - tan, with weaihered
� limestone and calcareous nodules
4_5+ 56 5Q-28-22 16 6.5 105
4.5+ 15
81 �.5 21-5DI5'" 59 33-17-'f 6 1 p
WEATHEREO LIMESTQN� - tan, with clay layers
5
807. Q
LIMESTbN� - tan
� SDIs/<"
5D!'/2'
1
r
Q
v
m
�
.�
U
0 B��.Q
� � LIMESTONE - g�ay r,���%a'
� 5Q!'/i'
w 15
0
�
c
�
E
�'
r
E
P
�
�
m
N
G FJd���ii
y � 795.d 501'/,��
°� Boring Terminated at Approximately 20 Feet
� Proposed Ele�ation = 813.D Feet
m Approximate Grading = 2.0 Feet Cut
d
�a
Lo
L]
fl
q
�
"c7
�
t
N
�1
O
01
C
-o Material 6ounda�ies are a roximaSe; in situ trartsiiions ma �e radual.
� Driller: Td - Nick Plate A.Zr'J
� Qrilfing Method: Cvntinuous Flight Augers
Log Projeot Na.
B-23 21-24892 Chapel Hill IVlultifamify
Boring Locatipn Sauth of Cibolv Hi Ils Parkway '
Fort Warth, Texas R� N E
Latitude Water Le�el Observations (feetj pate E FF G I N E E R I N G
32.9Q7$1� N While prilling Not nbserved 1-'E421
�ongitude At Boring Cvmpletipn Not Obser�ed o v
97.4117�° W End of oay Not Measured = � o
v � ;; � o'
41 tll L N pi Y C � _
Q �' C .d. '� � ._ G � � C
�' p � C 7 P (a] N..y. � �� C.7 �I N
w � � O S#ratum Description J� ~ � Z = e Q J � e �C C i
� T Q � y y O m:a •� m � _ � p L7'
N y � Approximate Surface Ele�ativn =$1 D.D feei $ O ran a� a in LL-PL-PI � u�i C � a.ai
FAT CLAY [CHj - dark brawn, with calcareous
nodules and gra�el
4.5+ 83 $D-28-32 23 02 92
4.5+ 15
sas.o
LEAN CU4Y �CLj - tan, with weathered limestone and
cafcarevus nodules
� 4.5+ 83 43-18-25 1a 2.5 122 19,320
19-12-17 84 43-20-23 12
N=29
12-19-45 14
iV=$4
1
0 798.6
m LIMESTflNE - gray
m
U
�
U
N
0
rn � 501'/a"
L 50!'/a"
w 15
a
d
G
.�
E
�
s
�
Q
m
m
m
4 5ff1%,"
�' � 79p.0 501'/��
� z Boring Terminated at Apprvximately 20 Feet
� Proposed Ele�ation = 809.fl Feet
d Apprvximate Grading = 1.D Foot Cut
�
N
8
�
0
�
�
�
�
N
C!
❑
�
C
�� MatBflal bWrW3riB8 arg a rdxiR191e: in si4u, iransilions rlh7 b6 raqual,
N I]rilker: Td - Jose Plate A.26
� drilling Methad: Cantinuous Flight Augers
Log Project Na.
B-�4 21-24892 Chapel Hill Multifamify
5outh vf Cibolo Hills Parkway �
Boring Lacation R p I�I E
Fnrt Warth, Texas
Latitude Water Le�el Qhservatinns (feet} aate E N G I N E E R l N G
32.9fl$d5° N Whife prilling Nat Observed 1-�421
�onyitude At Boring Campletion Not Observed w
9i.412Gd° W End oi Day Nat Measured � �' H
a � m L °"
a Mw p m� C w c
o. � c" � .— o � .b e
� o � � � o U ��' � Y � � m w
r � a ° Stratum Description °' z ~ � � � J , � �
Q a'� � Q �� �� a w ` _ =Q
°' +n � 'm 07y r �� �H� y � � uE
a •
'� � Approximate S�rface Ele�ativn = 802.fl feet � O u�i a� a in LL-PL-Pi � u3i o � v
FAT CLAY (CHj - dark brawn, with gra�eE and
�alcareous nvdules
A.5+ 18
?gg Q 17-18-5D13" 34 39-17-1A 4
WEATFtERED �IMEST�N� -1an, with clay layers
� �air= � s
5ar�z �
5 -
- wi{h arange-brawn
5614" 83 15
1
791,p
LIMESTONE - gray
�
n
d
c`4
� - tra�e clay
m
a
m �13-5Q13" 14
� 1
0
`m
C
Rr
Ce'
C
N
.r-.
E
�
d
�
`m
a � 5D!'/2'
" 782.� 5DI'/z'
�� Bvring Terminated at Approximafely 20 Feet
� Proposed Ele�ation = 801.0 Feet
m Apprvximate Grading = 1.fl Foot Cut
m
a
c
c�
�
v
c
a
�
r
�
�
rn
� Material houndaries are a mo6mate; in silu, transilions ma Ge radual.
� priller: TD - Jase
F❑rilling Methocf: Ca�tinuous Flight Augers Piate A.27
Log Project Na.
8-25 21-2489� Chapel Hill Mul#ifamiiy
Bvring Lacation S�uth �f Clhvlo HIIIS P2�1'kw2ly �� �� '
Fart Worth, Texas
t_atitude Water Le�el Observativns �feet} oate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.90805° IV Whi�e E7rilling I�ot abserved 1-�421
Longi[�de Ai 6oring Completion Afat abserved � �
91.412fi0� W End Qf day Not Measured = °- �
G Oi r r 0.
N Y N m Y C � C
.�' T � W O a Gf w � ��� V w d�tlt
��� ° Stratum Descriptivn �� � Q��- Y� m e 3= m
� � C Ca a Y � L
� � E a :: °i ° °' � 'en � m m a e°� �
� N W Approxirnate SurFace Ele�ation = 801.0 feet � d w a� a in LL-PL-PE g v�i o � U
FAT CI.AY [Ci-f} - dark hrvwn, with CBiCarr�vus
nodules
A.5+ 93 92-38-54 32 1.3 81
798.�
W�ATFIERE� LIMESTONE - tan, with clay layers
11-50I5" �0 59-25-34 Z
� 5011 " 3
501'/z"
5
- with orange-brown clay
14-5D13" 74 32-15-17 13
1 791.0
LIMEST�IYE - gray
r
o_
d
`�
�LG
Li
N
O
� � 5���n
� 1
0
m
a
�
E
�
r
E
Q
m
m
`m
wQ � i
2 �s�.a 5o�i„
a Boring ierminated at Apprvximately 2fl Feet
� Prvppsed Efevation = 801.0 Feet
� Approximate Grading = 0.0 Feet Fill
m
v
c
c4i
�
0
c
v
�
L
N
�
f71
C
'a Matenal 6oundaries are a roximale; in silu, transitions ma 6e radual.
� Qrilfer: Ta - Jose Plate A.2v
F❑rilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers
Lpg Projed No.
B-2S 2�1-24892 Chapef Hill Multifamily
Borireg Locatian 5vuth of Ciholo Hills Parkway �
Fvrt Worth, Texas R�[�I E
Latitude Water Le�ei Qhservations jfeetj Qate E N G I h3 E E R I N G
32.90805° N While Orilling Not �6served �-1T-21
�ongitude At Boring Completion Not Observed o �
97.412fi�° W�nd of Day Not Measured � e ¢ a
m r
� N m Y G � C
a �' � Q � m Y � ,fl ._ G � a b
� C H C 7 w, [] � i q� � LS 07 'N
w � � + S tra ium Descri p tian J� O � C = e Q J 3 e �� _ �
m N E � wN F- cm H� N � � e°�E
� N W �� a mm mm o 3 Z' =o
Appraximate Surface Ele�ation = 797.6 feet �� rrr a� a u� Lt-P4-PI � rn o a t�
FAT CL.AY �CHy - dark brown, with �aEcare�us
nvdules anrf gravel
3.a0 9D 71-30�1 2S
T95. a
LEAhF CLAY �CL] - tan, with sand, gravel, and
cal�areaus nodules
4.5+ 27
13-9fi-2A �5 28-16-12 5
r� N-4Q
791.p
WEATHERED LIMESTONE - tan, wiih clay zvnes
� 5�11"
1
�or�4 �
�
�.
�
ro
�
G
N
O c/�/g
�U1 JV1'�4 �
� � 501'/="
w 1
a
m`
c
�
�' 78�.Q
� LIMESTaNE - gray
E
�
m
m
`m
� � �orrz��
� z��.o �ar���
a z Boring ierminated at Approximatefy 2a Feet
a Prapvsed Ele�ation = 797.D Feet
�, Approximate Grading = OA Feet Fill
v
N
8
�
a
C
a
�
�
N[�
O
CA
C
�a AAatBnal houndaries are a raximate; in situ iransitions ma 6e radual.
N briller: TD - Tyler P1ate A.2�
F E3rilling Method: Cantinuous Flighf Augers
Log Project No.
g_Z7 21_74ggZ Chape! Hill Multifamily
8oringLocation South of Cibolo Hifls Parkway �
Fort Wvrth, Texas R�� E
Latitude Water Le�e! Qbservativns �feet] aate E N G! N E E R I N G
32.90$fl5' N While C]rilling Not ahse+ved 1-17-2"i
�angi�ude At Boring Cvmpletion Not Qbser�ed ,
9T.412fiQ° W �nd of pay Not Measured o � a �
o ai � .c
L N OI
Q �' L a ..�. '� � d w p '01 � O
� b ~ � � m F � � � � � � � i N
� � Q ; St�ratum Description � z � � = e a ; e •_ _ �
p u�'i E m °: v°�i H e e�a rn � �O °1 7 �¢
� W '�� a mm �°1 �0 3 �' =o
Approximate Surface Ele�atian =$Q2.0 feet � O rn a� a u� LL-PL-PI � ui G � c�
FAT CLAY �CHJ - brvwn, with tan and dark brown,
with calcareaus npdules and gra�el
4.5Q 22
4.5+ 88 51-23-28 16 197 19,72�
21-5DI4" 55 46-22-24 7
5 797.0
WEATHERE� LIMEST�NE - tan, with clay layers
� 501'/z'
501'/"
1
799.Q
LklNESTONE - gray
r
$
�
m
U
C
U
N
O
� � SQ���i
L
w �
p
N
C
.�
�
�
L
C
Q
d
{C
a sor��<�
N � 7sa.a �or�4 �
�� Boring Terminated at Appraximately 2fl Feet
7 Proposed Elevation = 865.� Feet
� Approximate Grading = 3.Q Feet Fill
d
a
.y
8
�
0
C
a
a
❑
Np�
❑
O1
C
'o � Malerial 6oundaries are a mximale; �n situ. transilions ma be radual.
y Qriller: T� - Tyler
F Drilling Method: Continuous Fl�ght Augers Plate A.30
Log Prpject No.
P.,� g1_24ggZ Chapel Hill Muftifamily
Baring Location 5outh vf Cibalo Hi[�s Parkway �� ��
Fort Wo�th, Texas
Latitude Water LeVel Ok]Sefvatlol'FS tfeetj Date E N G I N E E R I N G
32.9D904° N While Drilling iJot Dbserved 1-17-21
Longitude At Boring Completion Not �hserved e �
9T.41157° W End af �ay Nat Measured � a �
o � � ci
a y y r� v Y = a+ _
� � d E � N O �'_ b � � O
.'�' a F = � G V � s+ Z �� � m N
Q � � � 5tratum Description � � � � _ �� a � � � '_ = a
� fA � y r.d. N � C lb6 ,N � � d V�
N � �� � 61 61 l4 d ,0 'Z 2' C O
�i � rn a� a m LL-PL-PI � rn ❑ 3 c�
L�AN CLAY �CLj - tan, with sand and caE�areous
nadules
3.50 27 43-23-20 12 -D.1 1 a3
30-13-14 9
N=25
11-12-13 92 3$-17-21 12
5 N=25
WEATHERE� LIM�ST�NE - tan, with ciay layers
� 501%z'
50!%'
1
r
a°u
d
m
� LIMESTaNE - gray
�
0
v� � 501'/ ��
L 5Q1'/ �,
� 15
a
�
a
m
E
m
�
E
Q
d
m
y � 5flI%"
� 2 Bvring Terminated at Approximately 2� Feet
m
a
�i
m
a
c
U
�
❑
C
a
�
i
N
bl
O
01
C
0
Malerial 6oundaries are a rwcimate: in situ, transilions ma be radual.
y �illlEf: TI7 - TYIL'f Plate A.3'f.
F❑rilling Method: Continuous Flight Augers
Log Project No.
P_3 ��_�4gg� Chapei Hill Multifamify
5outh of Cibolv Hills Parkway �
8oring Location R Q N E
Fort Wvrth, Texas
Latitude Water Le�el Ohservations (feetj oate E N G I N E E R I N G
32.9n9�4° N While brilling Not Oi�served 1-1T-21
�ongitu�e At Boring Campletion Noi QSser�ed w
97.4115i° W End of C3ay Not Measured � °' w
o y z a
� N �'w = � c
a� �= a � Q �•— o � nfl
� —p � � �a U £ � y� � dua
� T¢ � 5tratum �escription �� 9 ��=o Q-' w o=� R
Q
� a m d ma '� d y � o
� N W � O v�i a� a in LL-PL-PI � v�i G � c�?
FAT CLAY �CFE} - dark �rnwn, with calcareous
nodules and weathered limestone
3.50 83 74-32-42 28 SS
4.5+ 17
4.5+ 19
' - brawn, trace cobbles
28-20-13 29 69-26�3 8
N=33
4VEATHERE� LIMEST�NE - tan, wifh clay layers
� 5612"
50I'1 "
1
r
a
m
m
�
_
U
w
0
� � 5°vri ��
w 1
0
�
C
�
�
�
r
�
a LIMESTONE - gray
d
�
m`
a � 501'/4'
N 50I'I4'
a� 6aring Terminated at A�proximaiely 2ff Feet
�
d
m
�
LO
U
fl
O
C
�
�
L
N
Ql
0
a
G
-o Matenal bouredaries are a roximate: in situ, transiiions ma 6e radual.
y Driller: Ta - Tyler Pfate A.33
� Rrilling Method: Cvntinuous Flight Augers
501L �R ROCK TYP�S
f �'i
���►�� Llndo�umen#ed Fill � Well-Graded Sand {SW} R� � E
� aM� EHGflIE E RING
�' /�/
Lean Clay �CL} Ckayey Sand [5C) DRILLING ANp SAMPLING METH�OS
Gra�e4ky Lean Clay [CL) °�� °° Well-Graded Gravel �GW}
o O�o �
Fat Clay (CH) �Marl
�
Shel�y 5plit Texas
°°° Gra�elly �at Clay {CH} _____= Weathered 5hale Tube Spoon Pen
Clayey Grav�l {GC) � 5hale
5ilt (ML} � Weathered l..imestone
�
Poorly-Graded Sand (SP} �Limestane c�A H5A R6C�C
� Core
TERMS pESCRIBING CON5157ENCY, CON�ITIDN, ANO 57RUCTURE OF SaIL
FiCiB �faIC1B� �QI�S {More ihan SG9� Aassing h1o. 200 Sie�e]
Cansistency Penetrometer Reading, ttsf� Unconfined Compressinn, (psf}
Very 5aft � D.5 � 100D
5aR 6.5 tv i.0 �vao to zoaa
Firm 1.0 to 2.� 20Q0 ta 4afl0
Hard 2.D tv 4.0 ADdfl fo 8�06
Very Hard � 4.p � saaa
�08fSE GCai11@Cl $p115 [More than 50Y Re[ained an No. 2oD Sie�e}
Penetrati�n Resistance Descripfi�e Item Rela#i�e Density
[61ows 1 Fovt}
0 to 4 Very Loose 0 ta 2�°Ia
4 to 1 fl Loose 26 to 40°Io
10 to 30 Medium Dense 4� to 7Q°Ia
30 iv 50 �ense 7D tv 9a°Ia
Qver 50 Wery �ense 9fl to 10fl°Io
Soi I StruCture
Cal�areaus Cantains appre�iaf�le deposits of �alcium carbonate; generaliy nadular
Slickensided Having inclined planes of weakness that ate siick and glossy in appearance
Laminated Composed o# thin layers of varying �olor or texture
Fissured Containing craeks, svmetimes filled with fine sand ar silt
Interbedded Composed vf alternated layers of different svil types, usually in approximateiy equal proportions
7ERMS aESCRIBING PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF R�CK
Hardness and Degree af CQmentatian
Very Soft or Plastic Can be remvlded in hand; corresponds in cvnsisten�y up to hard in soils
Saft Can be scratched with fingernail
Moderately Hard Can be scratched easily with knife; cannvt be scratched with fingernail
Hard Diffieult tv scratch with knife
Very Hard Gannvt �e s�ratched with knife
Paorky Cemented vr Friahfe Easify crumbled
Cemented Bound together hy chemiGally precipitated material; Quartz, calcite, doEomiie, siderite, and iron oxide are commvn cementing
materiafs.
Degree vf Weathering
LJnweathered Rock in its natural state bsfore being expvsed to atmflspheric agents
Slightly Weathered Noted predominantly by color change with na disintegrated zvnes
Weathered Complete coVor change with zones of slightly decamposed rvck
Extremely Weathered Complete cvlor change with consistency, texture, and general appearance apprpaching soil
KEY TD CLA551FICATIbN A�iD SYMB�LS PLATE A.34
Major �ivisions G�p� Typical Names �abaratory Classification �
5ym. Criteria R� 1� 1 E
1 �f
Q] N Well graded gra�els� E N G t N E E R� N G
�, � �, � GW gra�el-sand mixtures, a
�� �, �� little or na fines a Dn t�3�)z
� � �� c C=--- greater than 4: C=------ between 1 and 3
� a�, � a ,� " o„ ° D x QF,,
� � .� � �, Paarly graded grave�s, �
q N�� c:� v GP gravel-sand mixtures, q Not meeting all gradation requirements
� �, .a� little ar na fines � � for GW
� s�'�a� ZN �
N� � o� �, 5ilty gra�els, gravel -"� c�n c�r� � Liquid and Plastic limits Liquid and plastic
.Q � ,h z c�� GM sand - silt mixtures N� ��� belaw "A" line ar P.I. limits plotting in
� � �° � � — � � �' cn � � i�atched zane
-a m � � � � ;� � a � greater than 4
`� �� a U between 4 and 7
_ `� @ � ° ° � o � � `� are �orderline
� �n � �n a � � � � :� Liquid and Plastic limits
��� D �¢ a GC CEayey gra�els, gravel E� � C'7 6 aba�e "A" line with P.I, cases requiring use
�.L � �,� � - sand - clay mixtures a� : m af dual s mbofs
� � v � � ? � : � grealer than 7 y
o� �� :�n
v v m N Well graded sands, � y : � �o �a�y=
a�� �� 5� gra�elly 5ar1d5, littl� Df �� : � C�= Dc greaterthan fi: C� �%D between 1 and 3
,� U .� cv o no fines � � : �� ° "
� � �
� �, � �
@ {0 C �. ; � "�
� � a? �� Paarly graded sands, N� '� a Nat meetin ail radation re uirements
� � cn U.�' SP gravelly sands, little ar �` �, U� � � q
w. m u, Q � far 5W
m � a � � no fines � � � � �
o � w- ° � m y �- c� �
� � q z N Siit sands, sand siit � m�`�' �`� Liquid and Plastic limits Liquid and piastic
�� ��� SM y m i x t u r e s �;�@��- b e l a w " A" l i n e o r P. I. l i m i t s p l o tt i n g
�
°' � less than 4 between 4 and 7
� � m��,r
@ � � � '� �" Q � N �]
� � �� � ° � �, :� � `o ° are barderline
� N�� � N-� �� Liquid an� Plastic limits cases requiring use
o N � Q Q Cfayey sands, sand ��@ „,.
� N-- � sC cla y mixtures ��` abo�e A' line with P.I. of dua! symbals
`" � � � greater than 7
Inorganic silts and �ery fine
sands, ro�k flour, silry or
� �� ML clayey Fine sands, ar clayey 6p ,
� � — sifts with slight plasticity
� ��
.� � Inorganic days of Ivw to
c.i �� � C� medium plasticity, gra�elly �Q }
q N•� � �lays, sandy �lays, silty I
z �" .� cla s, and lean cla s CH : �
C {!] J
@ `~ Organic silts and arganic
� �
N� silty clays of low plasticity W aff � ' -- -- ,
— o� a
� z '
��
� Inorganic silts, micaceaus � i I
�� � MH or diatomaceous fine sandy � 3� - - i --
'� - N� or silty soils, elastic silts � � �
� � � � ^ g , �� QH and MH
� °? V �� �a' i I
� � � �-' '� Inorganic clays of high �0 - ' � ' — ' - --- —
� �� ro CH plasti�ity, iat clays �
°7 ° -� � CL
�
•� w' ��
� � � flrgarri� clays of inedium to ��
� `� �H high plasticity, organi� silts 4, � I
� � ML and OL
m
� �,.= N � Q 1Q 20 3a 40 5� fifl 7D 80 90 1a�
,� Peat and other highly
4 a' ���p Pt prganic soils LIqUI� LIMIT
� � Q I�� PLASTICITY CHAi2T
UNkFIEQ SOtL CLASSIFICATI�N SYSTEM PLATE A,35
SWELL TEST RESULTS
Chapel Hiil Multifamily
5outh of Cibal❑ Hills Parkway
Fprt Worth, Texas
Rone Project Number: 21-24892
��Boring O�pth Liquid Plasti� Plasticity Initia l MC Fin al MC Load Sweil
(ft] � Limit Limit Index ( Iej � { Io) � {psfj ( /e�
B-1 3 i5 31 45 26 32 375 3.8
B-2 8 7fl 30 4a 31 34 100a 0.0
B-5 3 �6 21 �5 'k fi 2� 375 �.0
B-7 1 44 24 2Q 21 25 125 �.2
B-8 9 --- --- --- 22 25 1125 1.fi
B-11 1 48 23 �5 21 26 125 fl.7
B-12 1 58 Z7 3� 16 2�# 125 -0.�
6-14 1 76 34 42 34 38 125 1.5
B-15 1 59 31 38 25 30 125 3.3
B-15 3 4fi 21 25 27 31 313 2.3
B-16 1 i6 32 44 28 32 '125 0.9
B-17 3 81 34 47 21 32 375 2.3
B-18 1 73 29 44 31 35 125 0.5
B-18 7 44 2a 24 2z 2fi 875 0.6
8-19 3 45 22 23 16 2Q 375 �.6
5-20 1 85 37 47 33 38 125 1.2
B-2a 7 53 21 31 22 26 875 1.�
B-22 1 5� 28 22 19 23 125 i1.5
B-23 1 fi� 28 32 24 30 125 �.2
B-23 5 43 18 24 16 24 S25 �.5
B-�5 1 92 38 54 33 38 125 1.3
P-1 1 43 23 2D 17 24 125 -D.1
PLATE A.35
50
0
�a
�
6 «
�
x 4Q
w � s
❑ �
z
— m
� �
� 30
U +
¢ ���
J �
d 20 � Q +
Q
10
� �
q
D 10 20 30 4D 50 6fl 70 80 9d 1D
V
��
�
�
�°
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Bvring
B-1
B-1
B-2
B-2
B-2
B-3
B-3
&4
B-4
B-4
B-5
6-6
g-s
6-T
B-7
B-7
B-8
B-9
13epth �ft]
2
8
0
1
7
2
8
D
4
13
2
�
B
a
$
13
0
�
R�NE
ENGIHEERlNG
LL
75
�8
71
3fi
7fl
49
49
42
59
41
46
60
3�
44
3$
B3
46
67
LI�LJID LIMIT
PL PI fines Bvring �epth {ftj LL
31 44 g5 X B-9 2 45
16 12 29 ■ 6-1� 0 53
33 38 56 e B-1 Q 4 z7
1? 19 19 � &11 D 48
3� 40 64 0 8-11 4 3Q
23 26 56 0 6-12 D 58
19 3Q 82 B &12 4 27
23 19 7z m 6-12 9 56
22 37 $7 0 8-13 � $1
18 23 81 � 8-13 5 �S
21 25 91 � 8-14 0 76
25 35 85 •� B-14 6 3fi
18 18 47 • B-15 D 69
�4 2Q 74 � B-15 2 4fi
Z9 17 i3 ° &15 3 25
28 35 98 x B-16 a i6
25 21 70 + B-'!6 5 49
27 4a 92 � B-1T 2 81
PLA�E A.37 PROJECT Nfl:
ATf�RBERG LIMITS TEST RESlJLTS FILE NAME
pRAWN SY:
Chapel Hill Multifamily REVISEQ BY:
South of Ciboko Hills Parkway
Fort Worth, Texas REVISE� BY:
PL
21
�8
16
23
15
2i
I4
23
2�
14
34
18
31
21
15
32
21
34
27-;
pl
�5
�5
11
25
15
31
13
33
55
14
42
18
38
z5
11
44
28
47
�
m
�
m
m
m
m
�
.,
..
m
m
m
:f
m
m
:�
m
:.
DATE: QZ-1
❑ATE:
QATE:
�AT�: D2-1
x
�
❑
z
�
�
U
�
�
¢
J
�
so
■
5fl
�
AO * X a
• �
� �
3a
0
� o
m��
�d �
� a
Q �
�v !
0
❑ 1� 2f} 30 40 50 60 70 86 90 10fl
�
»
�
�
�
0
�
�
�'r
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Boring
6-18
B-19
6-19
8-19
s-zo
B-2D
�-zo
8-21
B-2'i
B-22
B-22
B-23
B-�3
6-Z3
6-24
8-25
B-25
B-25
❑epth {fty
13
�
5
13
0
6
9
4
1
D
4
0
4
7
2
0
3
9
/
R� N E
E N G I M E E R I N G
LL
56
45
28
fi9
a�
53
45
57
36
50
33
fi0
43
43
31
9�
59
32
PL
23
22
17
28
3i
21
2fl
26
2�
2$
17
28
18
20
17
38
�5
15
PI
33
23
11
4i
48
3�
26
31
'4 5
22
16
3z
25
23
14
54
34
17
LI{�UID LIMIT
Fines Boring
52 x B-Zs
75 s B-2fi
63 e g-27
97 � B-�l
67 o P-1
84 � P-1
77 8 P-2
61 IA P-2
32 O P-3
56 � P-3
59
83
83
84
34
93
1a
74
Qepth (fty
0
4
2
4
0
4
2
4
�
5
LL
71
2$
51
46
�3
38
35
41
74
�9
PLAiE A.37 pRpJECT NO:
ATTER6ERG LIMITS TEST RESLJLTS FILE NAME
❑RAWN BY:
Chapel Hiil Multifamiiy REVISE� BY:
Svuth of Cibolo Hills Parkway
Fort Warth, Texas REVlSEd 8Y:
PL
30
15
23
22
23
17
�8
18
32
26
PI
41
12
28
24
2D
21
17
23
42
43
21-24892
2A-24$92.dV
emh oATE:
DA7E:
dATE:
emh �ATE:
Fir�es
90
55
88
55
27
92
91
78
83
29
i�bz�y��
89fl$ Amhassador Raw, Dallas, Tx 75247
�� �� Texas Engineering Firm Registration, Np. F-1572
Corporate Phone: (214} 530-4745
E R R T" w° R K 5 RECTM �vm pa�tion Desig n Report
Project Num�er: 21-24892 Fill: Building and Pavement Report Number: 24892-di
Project Name: Cha�el Hill Multifamily Remarks: Suhgrade Re�ompaction Report date: 2/22�ZQZ1
Project �wner: IMS De�elopment Produced By: Gary Haugardy
Control Specifications and References
Min °Io of Max �ry �er�sity 97°Ia
Resilient Madulus Methad AASHTa
Compacted �ill Property Requiremen#s
Air Voids Per�entage 7.2 °Io
Fact�r af Safety 1.8
Design Compacti�n Canditions
Loose Lift Thickness (in} 9
Compactor CAT 553 �ynami� High
U5C5 Ciassifcation SC Ranges
Specifc Gravity 2.66 2.65 - Z.71
Liquid Limit {�Io) 37 35 - 38
Plasticity Index {°Io} 19 18 - 20
Plastic Limit [°Io7 18
°Io Fines [Passing #2�0] 35 33 - 37
°Io Gravel [Retained #4} 3 2- 3D
°Io 5and [Passing #4] 62 33 - 65
Lift Praperties at 97�Io Cnmpaction on Construction CurWe t
w { °Io]
Y {Ehslft3}
S �°In}
e
Na (°lo}
w Potential (°Io}
UC5 (IbslFt�}
� (Ibs/ft�}
0 (�]
Free 5well (°/a}
CBR* {°/o}
C6R* (°Ia}
Res Mod {Ibslinz]
Res Mod tlbslinz]
A5TM d 2166
ASTM ❑ Z850
ASTM p Z85�
ASTM D 454b
Soaked
Unsoaked
5oaked
Unsoaiced
❑ry Sid?'
3.I.D
115.4
b7.7
0.43
9.7
+5.2
5,541
1,fi88
27
2.2
1.0
44.3
1,Sq8
28,9��
idel
14.3.
115.9
8b.5
Q.43
4.1
+2,Z
5,149
1,735
22
1.�
4.6
7.8
6,739
9,535
Toleranr�
t1°Io MC
t2°/o
t3°/o
t 3°Ia
t 3°/0
� 3°/a
t 20°/0
t lfl°/a
� 10°/0
f25°.Io
� l p°Io
t l �°/o
t1Q°/o
t1D°In
�
��
r
r
a�.
�
:'
n
91�� compacavn
,._ 1�15_9ihs�ft'- - --•--
,.�
'�c
1��
,
.�
'. cecx. CsaM1�
�' . . . . . — Zrl�
.
�
a
•�
.�
Lift Constrnction Cun-e
w : k2.2�k
v - 114_� lbs�'fi'
�
,4
� �
.
-- •--;--•-- - '.
; '.
� �
�
� �•.
i �, ',
•`
i
i
.�
i •
_ i
i i
�
. �
Constructian Con#ral SpecificatiQns
Minimum �Io of Maximum C} densi
COflStfLlCt€Ofl CUI'V2 ��%
Wet-of-O timum Moisture Ran e for 97°Ia
12.2%u - 1$.1%a (�1°/a MC}
N€inimum # of Roller Passes
� (Equiv. 4 rou�dtrrp pa55Ps, £WIIiR coveraye requ'medJ
Campaction �urves should be ohtained
regularly with changes in material index
properties and upon change in color or
texture for effecti�e constru�tion control.
M-D prohe depths should be centered on
the center of the rompacted fift.
f c arrd m- Unsaturated trraxial test, ta�al slress so+l paran�eter.
ilCS - lJncan£rned CamWessi ve 5[rength.
Measured ualues inrlude w, y, iJCS, c, m Free Sn ell, arrd CeR
(sraked and unsoakedj. Cakvlated �alues irrclude 5, e, Na, w
Pntential, and Resrlient Modulus (soaked arrd unsoakedJ.
We[ SiGe permea6ility irr field �at FaCinred in Hee Swell fes[
Cd+7ditifln.
* CeR 6ased an field rOm�aded stafe.
I Proyer[+es repr�eent average values.
; Soil Sample Qate: 1�15�2DZ1
� Loc: Dn-Site
, ; Desc: Upper-bound, full sail range
�12.2� �1�.
` '� - -• Authorixation By:
�Iai�tur� Canteut. �.: �'�'� �
Print Name:
Graph�cs pawered by Mathen7a7ica �ate: Fi rm Reg. #:
IJse of [his Compac#ion Design Report {"CPR") is suhject to all copyrights and 5hall �pmply with the [erms and conditions of all soRware liCenseS applicahle to the generation of this report. This CAR may be
used in practice solely For design analysis purposes for [he abo�e fll lift ["Fill"] and Prajec[, and [he use of this CQR For any oTher use pr f91 IiR ather than [hat Fill or for any purpose is not permitted. 7hi5 report
applies anly to lifts compaCteO o�er stiff and well-wmpat[ed lifts and subgrades. No part oF this CQR may be [opie6, downloaded, stored in a retrievai sys[em, Further transmitted, or otherv+ise reprodu�ed,
stored, disseminated, transferred, or used, in any farm or by any means, except as permitted in writing hy Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Ea�h reprodu[ti0n pT any part of this C�R mu5l [On[ain all mpyright
nptices and regis[ered trademaric designations [i9] and nan-registered trademark designations ['"].
Versian: 2.31.1 - 7.2
PLATE A.38a
84�8 Amhassadar Row, oarlas, Tx 75247
� 7exas Engineering Firm Registratian, No. F-1572
� � � � Corporate Phone: {214} &30-9745
E A R T H W O R C 5 RECT"' Compaction Design Report
Projert Number: 21-24892 Fill: Building and Pa�ement Repart Number: 24892-f}2
Project Name: Chapel Hill MultiFamily Remarks: 5ubgrade Recompactian Report Date: 2�2z�Z021
Project �wner: IMS Qe�elapment Produced By: Gary Hougardy
Cnntral Specifications and References
Min °Ia of Max ary Density 47°In
Resilient Modulus Methad AASHTO
Compacted Fill Property Requirements
Air Voids Percentage 7.2 °Io
Factor of Safety 1.5
Design Cvmpaction Conditions
Loose Lif� Thickness [in} 9
Campactor CAT 563 [7ynamic High
USCS Classifcation C� Ranges
Spe�ifi� Graviry 2.58 Z.65 - Z.71
Liquid Limit [�In} 42 4� - 44
Plasticity Index [°/o) 22 21 - 23
Plastic Limit �°I❑] 2Q
°/o Fines (Passing #2fl0] 55 53 - 57
°Io Gra�el [Retained #4} Z 1- 19
°/0 5and (Passing #4j 43 24 - 4fi
.
��. �n
�'. ------- ��
.�
�r
Lift Construction Cun•e
.`
iJ ��•?�[ •■
v : llff_4 ihs!t�`
' '.
.�
.
�
,`
--•---- --•--�•--•--•- ',
_ �
.�
; '.
� � � '•,
� �
i •'�
•�
i i
� � �•
3�,^,
r•
� �s
�+
.�r
���
�_.
i i
i i
i �
LiR Properties at 97�/a Compactian an Construction Curve t
[il (°/o]
V [fhslft3}
S {°/o}
�
Na (°Io}
w Potential (°/o)
UCS �IbslftZ)
c �Ibslftz}
� [�}
Free 5well (°In}
CBR* [°/o}
CBR* {�/n}
Res Mad (Ibslinz]
Res Mad (Ibs�inz)
ASTM D 215fi
ASTM R 2850
ASTM Q 285q
ASTM a 4545
Soaked
Unsoaked
5oaked
Unsaaked
bry Sid?1
12.1
113.4
68.�
0.47
�a.�
+5.7
6,379
�.r�60
27
2.7
1.1
34.9
]., 584
24,802
Wet Sidel
15.D
I13.4
84.4
0.47
4.9
+2.7
5,058
2r�8�
21
1.4
3.6
8.1
5,3$9
9, 782
Toiera n�e
t 1°Io MC
t 2°/n
t 3°/0
t 3°/0
t 3°/0
f 3°/0
f2�°Iv
t 1{��♦O
t 10°/0
t25°/o
f 1�°/0
f 10°/a
t1�°10
tID°Io
Construction Contral SpeciFcations
Minimum °I❑ f Maximum Dry �ensitv
Construction Curve 97°Ia
Wet-of-� timum Maisture Ran e for 97°Io
13.2�/0 - 15.0°/a (f i °/o MC]
Minfmum # of Raller Passes
, (Equiv. 4 roGndtrip p�sses, ful! IiR rnverage reqUrredJ
Cor�paction cur�es shouid �e abtained
regularly with �hanges in material index
properties and upan change in colar or
texture For effecti�e construction cantrol.
M-Q prabe depths should I�e eentered an
the center of the Compacted lift.
t c arrd �- 1Jnsaturated tnaxial tes[, total so ess sod parameter.
UCS - UnCanhned Carnpressrve Strength.
Measured ualues incYude r., y, IJCS, W m Hee Ssvell, and C&R
(soaked and unsoakedj. Cakulafcd values i�rdude 5, e, Na, w
Potential, a�rd Res�7ient Modulus (soakeC and unsoaketlJ.
We1 Side permea6ilify in ireld �rof factored in Free Swel! test
rondrfrari.
* CBR hased on fielA mmparted state.
1 Pe,7perties represent average values.
; ; Soil Sample Date: 1/15�2fl21
; ; Lac: On-Site
Desc: Upper-bound, predaminant soil range
� i3_2 c � 1�_�'r
�
1�Iaisture Cant:nt. �, �:'_� i
Graphees pnsvered by Mathematica
Authorization By:
Print Name:
�ate: Firm Reg.#:
lJse of [his C�mpaction Design Repon {"C�R"] is su6jec[ [a all copyrights and shall mmply with the terms and conditions of a11 software licenses applica6le to the generation oF [his report. This C6R may he
used in practire soleiy far des€gn analysis purposes for the a6ove f31 lift {"Fil!'� and Pro}ect, and the use of [his C�R For any other use or fill lift other than [hat Fill or For any purpose i5 not permitted. This report
applies only to liRs compacted over stiff and well-compacted IiF[s and subgrades. No part of [his CRR may be cnpied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval sys[em, Further transmitted, or otherwise reprpduted,
s[pred, disseminaled, translerred, or used, in any form or 6y any means, except as permit[ed in wnting 6y Rpne Engin2enng Servites, Ltd. Each repruduCtEon pf any part of this CDR must contain all copyright
notices and registered trademark designa[ions [�] and non•registered irademark designations ['"J.
97� compacpon. __
113.�} �Ibs � ft
Version: 2.31.1 • 7.2
PL4TE A.38b
8908 Amhassador Row, Dalias, Tx 75247
�� �� Texas Engineering Firm Registration, Na. F-157�
Corpvrate Phone: {Z14] fi30-4745
E R R T H W❑ R K 5 RECT"' Compa�tion Design Report
Proje�t Number. 21-Z4892
Pro�ect Name: Chapel Hil! Multifamily
Project Owner: IMS �e�elapment
Fill: 6uilding and Pa�ement Report Number: Z489z-�3
Remarks: Subgrade Recornpaction Report Dat�: 2JZ2�2dZ1
Produced By: Gary Hougardy
Cantral Spe�i�ications and Referenees
Niin °/o of Max Dry Density 95°IQ
Lah Reference Stanc�ard ASTM ❑ fi98 (SP}
Resilient Madulus Method AASHTa
Compacted Fill Praperty Requirements
Air Voids Per�entage 7.2 °/o
Factor of 5afety 1.Z
�esign Compaction Canditions
Loose Lift Thickness (in} 9
Compactor G4T 563 Statir
115CS Classification CH Ranges
Spe�ifi� Gra�ity �.58 Z.65 - Z.71
Liquid Limit {°/n} 53 51 - 54
Plasticity Tndex �°/o} 28 27 - 30
Plasti� Limit [°Io� 25
°Io Fines (Passing #2aa} 71 59 - 73
°Io Gra�el (Retained #4} 2 0 - 9
°Io 5and [Passing #4} 27 18 - 31
Lift Properties at 95°Iv Compaction an Constructian Curve t
[� (°Io)
Y (Ibs��t3}
S (°/o}
e
Na [%}
u� Potential [°/o)
UCS (Ibslft�}
� [I�slftz)
� (°}
free 5well (°/o}
CBR* (°/o}
CBR�` [°/o]
Res Mod {Il�slin2}
Res Mod {Ibslin�}
ASTM ❑ 2166
A5T'M D 285D
AsrM a zsso
ASTM Q 454b
Soa Eced
Unsoaked
5oaked
U nsaaketf
Dr-�Si-de'
15.2
3.03.4
55.9
0.62
13.Q
+7,$
4,$77
1, S75
24
4.1
0.8
23, f�
1, 24S
19, 327
W i 1
19.3
103.4
83.8
0.62
b.2
+3.7
4, 896
1,775
18
1.4
2.9
5.6
�4,287
7, 712
Tolerance
� 1 °/a P'IC
t1.8°Io
f 3°Io
t 3°Io
� 3°/0
t 3°Io
f2D°Io
�1D°Io
tlp°/o
t25°/o
t 10°Io
�1D°Io
�1�°Io
� f 0°/0
„�
I
-. •;-
�
j
� ���
�
��
�15.��c �19-r
\ioi-*ure Co*itrxit. �r t ": �
�
Autharizatian 6y:
Print Name:
❑at�: Fi rm Reg. # :
" ASTrif P fi98 (SP) equrvalen4 Corrected tn ronhol relah've n+a'sture s[andae-Q in Cpnst�uction. Graphics powered 6y Mathematica
Use af this CompaCtipn Reslgn Report ["CQR") is suhjec[ [o al! mpyrlghts and shall compfy with the terms and �andi[ions of all SoRware li[enses applica6le to [he generation of this report. This C�R may he
used in practice sdeky for design analysis purpases for the a6ove flE lift {"Fill") and Project, and the use oF this CPR for any other use or FA lift other than that Fill or far any purpose is nat pertnitYeci. This report
applies nniy to IiRs compacted over stiff and well-compacted lifts and su6grades. No part of this CDR may he oopied, downloaded, stwed in a re[rievak sysEem, further transmi[ted, or otherwlse reprpduoed,
s[ored, dissem[naoed, transferred, ar used, in any fnrm ar by any means, ex[ept as permitted in wr€ting hy Rone Fngineering Services, Ltd. Eadi r2production of any part of this C�R must conTain all mpyright
notices and registered trademark designations [C]] and rwn-registered irademark designations ["`}.
y�� �om,.pac�on- -- --
1I13_4 Ihs; pta-.
.
- C�1H. G'JM1?
_ — -- - as�nt n �s�
zai-
Lab cd a[ 9��C cvrngactian
�`.
Dr� Side= 16_fi Gc
� ► �C��L sf[�G" 2 i _ � Gc
Lift Construetivn Cun e
w : 1�_5 c
y � ias.s m$�� ��'
;:�sni � �4a �sp�#
� w : 18.3� �•.
� , ��y : :65.3 Ibs `ft". ``'
�
� � .
-- � -- -- --� --�� • . .. . _. � �
; � 1 � � •,
;r ; ��
i � .
��
1+
i�
r�
r�
i
i �
� �
1
� � \
i �
� �
,
�
Construction Control 5pecifications
Minimum °I f M ximum D ❑ nsi
Canstruction Curve 95°/n
ASTM D 698 [5P] 98°Io
Wet-of-�ptimum Moisture Range for 95°/n
1b.5 - 19.3°Ia (f1°Io I�C)
Minim m# of Raller P sses
8 (Equiv. 4 rINrrn7h�p pa.sses rull !iR rpverage requiredJ
Compactivn curves shouid he ahtained
regularly with changes in material index
properties and upon change in colffr or
texture for effecti�e rnnstrudian cantrol.
M-D probe depths should be centered on
the center of the �ompacted lift.
t c a�d �- Unsaturated hiaxral tes4 total stress sail parameter.
l/l5 - 1/RCOrrFined Campressi�e Strength.
Measured values inclvde w, y, CICS; r, � Free Swell, and CBR
(5aaked and u�soakedJ. CalCulaled values include 5, e, Na, r�
Potentral, arrd Resilien[ Mpdulus (soaked a�rd unsaakedJ.
wet snce pem�ea6inry in fie�a nar rarrored rn Frer swen resr
condrtrori.
* C6R ha.sEd an I'reld Compacted state.
1 PmpeRies represent average values.
� � SQiI Sampie aate: 1�15J2�21
' ' Loc: On site
� Qesc: Micfpaint, predaminant soil range
Version: 2.31.1 • 7.2
PLATE A.38c
89�8 Am6assador Row, Daflas, Tx 75247
F�� N E Texas EngEneering Firm Registration, No. F-1572
Corporate Phvne:(214} b30-9745
E A R T H w o R�� RECT'" �ampaction D�sign Report
Praject Number: 21-2489�
Project Name: Chapel Hill Niultifamily
Project Owner: IM5 Develapment
Fill: BuiEding and Pavement Report Number: 24892-Q4
Remarks: Subgrade Recornpaction Repor� oate: 2j22�2021
Praduced By: Gary Hougardy
Cnntrnl Specificakians and References
Min °/o of Max �ry density 95°Io
Resilient Madulus Method AASHTD
Compacted Filf Property Requirements
Air voids Percentage 7.2 °Io
Factor of 5afety 1.�
Design Compa�tivn Condit"snns
Loose Lift Thickness (in} 9
Compa�tor CAT 563 Static
U5C5 Classification CH Ranges
Specific Gra�iry z.68 2.65 - 2.71
Liquid Limit [°Io} 72 7Q - 74
Plasticity Index [°In} 42 40 - 44
Plastic Limit (°/n} 30
°Io Fines (Passing #2D0) 88 86 - 9D
°Io Gra�el (Retained #4} 2 0- 3
°Io Sand (Passing #4) l.fl 7 - 14
Lift Prnperties at 95p/o Compaction an Construction Curva t
[� {°Io}
Y [Ibs�ft3}
5 (°In}
e
Na [°Io]
w Potential �°/o}
fJCS [Ibs�ft�}
c (fbs�ftz}
0 [°)
Free 5well {a1a}
CBR* (°/n}
CBR* (°/o}
Res Mad (1651inz]
Res Mod [IbsJinZ]
ASTM D 2155
ASTM D 2$5a
ASTM � �$54
ASTM ❑ 4546
5aaked
Unsaaked
Soaked
L7nsoaked
p • �
19.2
95.8
69.1
0.74
13.2
+8.6
3,874
1,30�
zz
5.2
0.6
15.1
848
i4,49D
Wet 5ide1
23.2
95.$
83.5
4.74
7.1
�4,6
3,$36
1,473
15
1.9
2.5
3.5
3,723
5,436
�olerance
�f°Io MC
�2°/a
�3°/a
f3°/n
t 3°/0
t3°Io
t2D°/o
f 1D°/o
t 1Q°Iu
�25°In
t 1Q°In
t 1�°Ia
f 1Q°/o
f 10°Io
r
i
:.
j
�
.�
`. r.�c�s c-.�y
„� �'. -•---- aa,�-
.�
.�
.��
L'eft Constmcrian Cnrre
r;1 : 21i.��c
Y _ i4a.9 n75: t� �.
' � ;1
�
'•�
' •.
4� � �om action '
V �"""'_""'__'_' _"'T___..�""_�
= 9�.8Ib��i� �^.
, � .
� i
W� i �
� i
gF � �
�
a� �. '?p_�4�
�
�
Constructian Cnntroi Specifications
Minimum °Ia of Niaximum Ory Densi
Construction CuNe 95°Ia
Wet-of-Optimum Moisture Range for 45°Io
24.4°Io - Z3.2°/a �*1°Io MC}
Minimum # f Roller Passes
$ (Fquiv, a mundtrip passes, Iu111iR caverage requiredJ
Campaction curves should be obtained
regularly with �hanges in material irrtfex
properties and upon change in color or
texture for effe�ti�e canstru�tion cantrof.
M-� probe depths should be centered on
the center of the compacted lift.
t r and �- U�saturated fnaxial test, tp�a1 stress sail �2meCer.
UG5 - Urrconl'ined Campressive SYrenyth.
Measurcd �alues indude a, y, (IC.S, c, m�rec 5we11, arid CBR
(soaked and vnsoakedJ. Cakulatcd values incJc^de S e, Na, r�
Poiential, and Resrlient Malulus (soaked and unsoakedJ.
Wel side permea6ilit}r in �i�ld �ol facfnred in Fr ee SwPll tPyY
cw�drfrwi.
* C8R based on feeld cwnparted stare.
1 Properties represcvrt average values.
Snil 5ample Date: 1�15�2�21
' Loc: �n-5ite
' Desc: Lower-bound, predominant soil range
'33.?G�
���DISilli� COI1�2:i?_ i.; i `� ,
�
Authorizatian By:
Print Name:
Graphics pnwered by Mafhematica � pate: Firm Reg. #:
Use uf this Cpmpaction Design Report ("Cl]R"} i5 Subje�i. tp all copyrights and shal� wmply wi[h [he terms and conditions of al! software licenses applicahle [o the genera[ion of this repor[. This C�R may be
u5ed in practi�e so�ely for design analy5i5 purposes for fhe a6ove fll IiR ("Fill"] and Project, and the use of this COR Sar any other use or fil� IiFC piher than [ha[ FiEf ar Por any purp6se is npt permitted. This report
applies oniy to lifts compaCted Over Stiff and well-compac[ed lifts and Subyrade5. fVo part pf this COR may be copied, dawnloaded, 5[pred in a r2irieval system, further transmit[ed, pr otherwise reproduced,
stored, disseminated, tran5fprred, or used, in any Form or hy any mean5, except as permi[ted in writing by Rane Engineving Serrices, L[d. Each reproducYian of any part Of this CDR mus[ contain all capyright
notices and registered uademark designa[ions [iy} and nOn-regis[ered trademark designa[ions ('"]
Versian� 2.31.1 - 7.2
PLATE A.3$d
84Q8 Ambassador Row, Qallas, Tx 75247
�� �� Texas Engineering �irm Registrativn, IVo. F-1572
Corporate Phvne: {214] 530-9745
E R R 7 H w❑ R K S REC�'" Cvmpaction Design Report
Projeet Number: 21-2489Z
Project Name: Chapel Hill Multifamily
Project �wner: IM5 De�eloprnent
Contral Spe�i�ications and References
E�in °Io of Max Dry Density 98°/0
Resilient Modulus Method AASH70
Campacted Fill Property Requirements
Air Voids Percentage 7.2 °Io
Factar of Safety 3.1
�esign Compactio� Conditians
Loose Lift Thickness (in] 9
Compactor G4T 553 Static
USCS Classi�cation CH Ranges
5pecific Gra�ity 2.C$ Z.65 - 2.71
Liquid Limit (°/o} 85 84 - $6
Plasticity Index [°/o} 54 53 - Sb
Pl�sti� l.imit {�Io} 31
°/o Fines �Passing #20a] 95 94 - 9fi
°/o Gra�ei {Retained #4} 1 a- 1
°Io Sand (Passing #�4] 4 3 - 6
Fili: Building and Pavement Report Number: 29892-05
Remarks: Suhgrade Re�ompaction Repart date: 2J2212021
Produced By: Gary Hougardy
Lift Properties at 98°Io Cornpaction on ConstruetRon Currre t
w (°Io}
Y �Ibs/ft3)
S {°/o}
�
Na [°lo}
ca Patential t°Io}
UCS [Ibs�ft�)
c {Ihs�ft�}
� [°)
Free Swell (°/o}
CBR* �fl/❑}
�6R* �°/a}
Res Mod {Ibs�inz}
Res Mod tlbs�inz)
ASTM ❑ 2I65
A57M D 285a
AS7M 0 2$50
ASTM ❑ 4546
Saaked
lJnsaaked
5oaked
Unsoaked
Dry Sidel
� 2z.1
94.3
75.4
fl.77
1D.3
+b.8
3,342
1,144
21
5.9
a.5
13.3
766
13,37�
Wet Sidel
Z4.5
94.3
$4.7
Q.77
6.7
+4.4
3,1b5
1,251
13
2.2
2.4
3.�
3,5q5
4,$14
Tolerance
t1°In MC
t2°/a
t3°In
� 3°Io
f 3°/u
t 3°Io
t20°/o
t 10°/0
f 10°/0
tZ5°/o
t 1q°/v
t lClalo
t 10°Io
t 10°Io
�.
x
�
n
.�
Ce�sc. c�rcn
------- �'+�"
v�=
,�
r
•
�•.
�J�'
Lift Canstruuion Cur�•e
L•J : �7_4uc
'v : QS.? I�SS' #� _
=' 98� cnrnpaction __ . -- . _...
9�.3 l6s rft�
��
gF i
i
i
�
i
5� i
�F � .....�� •
��
�
� .
�
�
�
�
:22.9�c �
tioi=ntre C't�titer�t. c� � ` : i
�
Graphia porvered 6y Mathematica
Construction Control S�ecifiGations
Minimum °Io of Maximum ary �ensitv
CDE15tfUCtIDf1 CU�'VE 98°/0
Wet-of-Qptimum Moisture Range far 98°Io
22.9°/0 - 24.5°Io � f l°/o MC}
Minimum # of Roller Passes
$ (Equi� 9 roundtrrp p�asses, (u111iR caverage requiredJ
Compaction cur�es should t�e obtained
regularly with changes in materiai index
properties and upon change in coior or
texture for efFecti�e construction control.
M-� probe depths should �e eentered an
the center of the compacted lift.
1 c and �- Unsarurated [riaxial test, mtal stress sarl parameter.
UCS - Unrarrhrzed Campressive Strength.
Measured values include r., y, UCS, w m Free SYvell, arrd C@R
(sca�ked arrd unscs�kedJ. Calcula[cd values indude S, e, +ua, w
Pntenlial, and Resilienf Mcdulus (snaked and unsoakeGJ.
Wet side pe�mea6ility in fiel� rrot facfrxea in Fiee Swell test
cp�ditian.
* CBR 6ased an freltl romparterl state.
1 Prope�tras �epresent average values.
Soil 5�mple Date: 1� 15�20Z 1
�oc: pn-Site
Desc: Lawer-hound, full soil range
Authorizatio� 6y:
Print Name:
Date: Firm Reg.#:
Use of this Compattion Oeslgn Report ["CDR"j is Subject lo all Copyrights and Shall compty with the [erms and oondi[iwis of ali software liCenses appficable to the genera[ion of this repart. This CDR may 1]e
used in p�adice safely ipr design analysis purposes for the abp�e fll liR ["Fill"] and Prpject, and [he use af thi5 C�R fOr any pther use Or flk IiR O�her [han that Fill or ior any purpase is nnt permitted. 7hi5 repprt
applies only [o lifts �ompac[ed rner s[iN and well-compa�ted liffis and subgrades. No part of [his CDR may 6e copied, downloaded, s[ared in a retrie�al system, Furiher Lransmit[ed, pr ntherwise reproduoed,
stored, disseminated, [ransFerred, or uscd, in any Form a by any means, except as permitted [n writlng 6y Rone Engineering Services, Ltd. Each reproduciia� of any part of [his G�R must �ontain all copyright
notioes and regis[ered [radmwrk designations [�] and non-regisSered trademark designations {�^}.
Version; 2.31.1 - 7.2
PLATE A.38e
APPENDIX B
R�ME /'
`=-�
FIELD E]CPLDRATI4N
SubsurFace conditions were defined by 30 sample horings lacated as shawn on the 6oring
Location Diagram, Plate A.3. The barings were completed at lacations staked in the field by Rone
personnel. The barir��s were advanced between sample intervals using continuaus flight auger
drilling procedures. Field and laboratary test res�alts, sarnple depth, descriptian, and soil
classificativn f�ased on the lJnified 5oil Classification 5ystem are shvwn vn the Logs of Bvring.
Keys tv the symbols and terms used vn the logs are presented in Apper�dix A.
Relatively undisturbed samples of cohes��e soils were vbtained using naminal 3-in�h diameter
tuhe samplers at the locations shawr� vn ihe Lags af Baring. The tube sampler consists of a steel
tube with a sharp cutting edge conne�ted to a head equipped with a ball valve #hreaded for rad
cQnnection. The tube is pushed into the soil by the hydraulic pulldown of the drilling rig. The sail
specirrtens were extruded from the t�abe in the field, logged, tested for �onsisten�y with a hand
penetrvmeter, sealed and pa�kaged to limit loss of moisture.
The cansistency vf cahesive soil samp�es was evaluated in the field using a calibrated hand
peneirometer, ln this fest, a'/a inch diameter piston is pushed into a relati�ely undisturbed sample
at a constant rate to a depth af apprvximately'/4 in�h. The resulis af these tests are presented at
the respecti�e sampfe depths on the Logs of Boring. When the capaGity of the per�etrameter is
exceeded, the value is tabulated as 4.5�+.
5amples of stiff andlar granular materials were ohtained using split-barrel sampling procedures
in general accordance with ASTM D158fi. In the split-barrel pracedure, a disturbed sampfe is
obtained in a standard 2-inch OD split-barrel sampler dri�en 18 inches inta the graund using a
14Q-pound �ammer falling freeiy 30 inches. The numher af blows for the last 12 in�hes of the 18-
inch penetration is recorded as the 5tandard Penetratian Test resistance [N-�alue�. The N-�alues
are recorded on the Logs of Boring at the depth of samp�ir�g. The samples were packaged and
returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing.
Rack and rack-like materiais encauntered in the borings were evaluated with a rriodified �ersion af
the Texas Cane Penetration (TCP] test. Texas Department af Transpa�tation [TxC70T} Test Method
Tex-132-E specifies driving a 3-in�h diameter cone witf� a 17d-pound hamm�r freely falling 24
B.1
R�hIE ,j
..,t,�
inches. T�is results in 34Q faot-�ounds of et�ergy far each hammer bl�w. This method was modified
by us�ng a'i4fl-pound hammer falling 3� inches, resulting in 35� fvpt-p�unds of per b€aw. in relatively
soft materials, the pene#rameter cane is dri�en 1 foot and the n�mb�r of bl�ws required fvr each fi-
inch in�rement is recorcled at the respe�tive teSt depth an the lag of boring. In hard materials �rock
ar ro�k-like}, the penetrameter cone is driven 1Q� blaws, and the resulting pen�#ration distances are
recorded in inches far the first and secand sets of 5� bfows. The pen�tratian far #he total 1 QO k�lows
is recarded at th� respectiv� testing depths �n the Logs of Baring.
Groundwater observatians during and at cample#ion of drilling are shown on the Lags of Boring.
EJp�n c�mpletian af drilling, the borehales were k�ackfilled with auger cuttings t� ground level.
B.1
R�hl�
LABDRAT�RY TE5TING
Labaratory tests were per�ormed on selected samples re#rieved from the horings to evaluate the
engineering characteristics vf the subsurFace mat�riafs, and to provide data for develaping
engineering design parameters. The subsurface materials re�overed during tF�e field explaration
were described by an engineering g�olagist or seni�r staff inember in the field andlor the
labflra#ory, and were later refined based an results af the laboratary tests perfarmed.
Classificativn Tests
All re�overed sQil samples were classified and described, in part, using the Unifi�d Sail
Classification 5ystem (USCS�. Visual classifcation of s�ils was verified by index testing, including
nafurai moisture cantent determinations, Atterherg fimits, and gradation tests �per�ent passing
the No. 2�Q iJ.S. Standard Sie�e}. All t�sting was pertarmed in general accardance with
applicable American Sociely fvr Testing and Materials (ASTM} procedures as follows:
Test A�7M Standard Number
Atterberg Limits a43"�$
Percentage of Particles Passing the No. 20Q Sieve D'114�
Maisture Content
Dry Unit WeEght
Unconfined Campress€�e 5trength
Swell Test
5well Pressure
Hydrometer
D2216
Q2167
❑21 fi6
�4546, Method B
�4546, Method C
o�szs
5aluble 5ulfate Cancentratian TEX-'f45-E
Swell Test
In the swell test, a sample is placed in a Gonsoiidvmeter and SUtJf2CtEC� t� the estimated
Q�erbur-den pressure. The sample is then inundated with wa#er and allawed ta swefl. Maisture
contents are deiermined bath befvre and after campletian of the test. Test results are recorded
as the percent swell, with initEal and final moisture cvntent. Detailed swell test results are
tabulated in Append'rx A.
lln�anfined Compression Strength Test
In the unconfined cornpressian tes#, a cylindrical specimen is subjected to axial load at a �onstant
rate of strain unti! failure Qccurs. 5trengths determined by this test are tabu�ated at their respective
B.2
R�N�� .,. ,,,
sample depths vn the Logs af Baring. Resufts af natural moisture c�ntent and dry unit weight
determinativns are alsp tabulated at the respe�ti�e Sample depths an the logs.
Hydrometer Test
A repr�sentative sample of the mat�rial is thoroughly mixed wi#h wa#er and a dispersing agent, and
placed into a cylindrical �olumn of water. A sphygmomanometer is used to measure the decrease
in density of the saiilwater slurry as sail particles settle aut of the mixture. The rate in density change
is used to determine the particle size distrihution af material finer than the No. 200 sie�e.
5aiuble Sulfate C�ncen#rativn Tests
In this test, a small sample is dried, crushed, and ground, and then shaken or stirred into a
container of distilled water and allowed to saak at least 12 hours. After soaking, t�e salutian �s
stirred again, and the soil is filiered frvm the water. A suffate test tablet is dissolved into a small
amount of the 'Filtered water, and the amount of light passing through the resultir�g salutivn is
meas�red using a ca�lvrimeter ta determine sul�ate cvntent.
�
APPENDIX C
The Geoprafessional 6usiness Assacsation [GBAj
has prepared this ad�isary ta help yau — assumedly
a elient represenfati�e — interpre# and apply this
geotechnical-engineerFng report as effecti�ely as
passibie. In t�rat way, you can benefit from a lawered
exposure ta probiems associated with subsurface
�vnditions at praje�t sites and de�elvpmen# of
them tha#, for decades, ha�e peen a principa! cause
of construction delays, cnst a�erruns, claims,
and dispu#es. If yau ha�e questians or want more
information aE�out any of the issues discussed herein,
cvntact your GgA-mem�er geotechnical engineer.
Acti�e engagement in G8A exposes geotechnical
engineers tn a wide array af risk-�onfrontation
techniques that can be af genuine henefit #or
e►►eryone in�ol�ed with a construction project.
Understand the Geatechni�ai-Engineering 5ervices
RraWided #or this Re{�ort
Geoteclinical-engineering ser�iees typitally intludc thc pianning,
tnllettion, interpretation, and analysis af expinratnry data fro�n
widely spaced hnrings andlor test pits. Field data are combined
with results from la6aratory tests of soil and ratk sarnples obtained
frnm field exploration {i{ applica6le}, a6ser�ations made during site
rcronnaissanre, and ��istprica] information to form onc or more models
af the expected subsurface conditions beneath the site. Local geology
a:id alterat'sons of [he site surfa�e and svbsurfacc hy pre�inus and
proposed construction are also impnrtant �nnsiderations. Geotechnical
engineers appiy their enginccring training, experienee, and judgment
to adapt the requirernents nf the prospettive praje�t to the su6surfaee
f�zodel{s}. Estimates are made nf the subsurface ennditions that
will likely be expased during tonstruction as well as the expeeted
performance nf fous�datinns and nther structures heing planncd andlor
af�etted by canstruction activitirs.
The culminatian of these geotechnical-engineering ser�i�es is t}�ically a
geoteehnical-engineering report pro�iding Yhe data obtained, a distussion
❑f thc subsurfaee modei{s), tl�e engineering and geolflgi� engincering
assessments and analyses made, and the r�commendations developed
to satisfy tt�e gi�en requiremenis oithe prvject. These reports may be
titled in�estigations, cxplorations, studies, assessments, or evaluations.
Regardless oFthe ti[le used, the geo[eehnical-engincering repnrt is an
engineering interpretatios� nf the su6surface cnnditions wiEhin the context
of the projeet and does nai represent a close exainination, systemati�
inquiry, or thorough investigatinn of all site and subsurfa�e canditions.
Gentechnical-�ngineering Serrrices are PerFormed
far Specific Purposes, Persans, and Projects,
and At 5peci�G Times
Geotechnical enginecrs structure their ser�iees to tneet [he spe�ific
needs, goals, and risk managexnent preferences of their clients. A
geniethnical-engineering study �onducted for a gi�en ci�il enginecr
wi]I n�t iikely meel lhe needs of a ci�il-works conslructor or e�en a
different ci�il engii�eer. 8ecause each geotechnicai-engineering study
is unique, each gcotcchnical-engiszeering report is unique, prepared
sole�y fnr the rIienl.
I,ikewise, geotechnital-enginccring ser�ices are performed for a spetiiit
project and purpose. For example, it is unlikely lhat a genteehnical-
engincerin�; study for a refrigerated warehouse wi116e the same as
one prepared Fnr a parking garage; aiid a few 6orings drilled during
a preliminary study to e�aluate site feasihility will :iot be adequate to
de�elop geotethnical desibn r�co�nmcndatinns for the project.
I?o nol rely on tFars re�ort if ynur geniechnical engiz�eer prepared it:
• for a different client;
• for a different project nr purpose;
• for a dif�erent sitc [that may or may nnt inclvde a1l or a poriion oE
the origicial site}; or
• before important evei�ts occurred at the site nr adjacent tn it:
e.g., man-made e�ents like �onstru�tion or en�ironmer�t�sl
remediation, or natural events like floads, droughts, earthquakes,
or graundwater flu�tuatinns.
Note, too, thc reliability of a genteel�iiiCal-ecigis�eering rcport can
be affected i�}' the passage nf time, because of factors like �hanged
su6surface conditions; new or moc�ifieci enc�es, slandards, nr
regulations; or new tcchniqu�s or toals. Ij you are fhe deasf bit uncertain
abnut the cvntinued reliability of this report, tontact your gentechnical
engineer �efore applying tl�e reenitimendatinns in it. A minor amflunt
of additiot�al testing or analysis after thc passage of time - iF any is
rcquired at all could pre�ent majar problems.
Read this Repart in Full
Castly problems ha�e oceurred hec:ause thvse relying on a geotechnical-
engineering report did not rcad thc rcport in iFs cntirety. Da not rely orr
an executi�e suinmary llo nnt read seletti�e elements only. Heud and
refer to ihe repart iv� fietl.
You Need ta Inform Ynur Geotechnical Engineer
Abaut Change
Your geotechnical engineer cnnsiclered unique, project-specific factors
when de�eloping thc scope of study hehind this report and dc�cluping
the confirmatinn-dependent recommendations the re�nrt cnn�eys.
Typical changes that eouid erode the reIiahiiity oF tliis report include
those that affect:
• the sile's sixe or shape;
• the ele�ation, configvration, location, orientation,
fus�ction or weight nf the prnposed strutture and
lhe desired perFormance �ritcria;
. the campasition of the design team; or
• projett ownership.
As a generai rule, always inform your gevtechnieal enbinccr of project
nr site cha:iges - even minor nnes - and request an assessment af tl�eir
inipact. Thegeote�i�nie•rr! engineer whe� prepared thrs report eanrao[ accep�
■ ■ ■
�� �
n �n r� r
ea
� �
respansibrlit}� orliuhifity for probderns [hr�t ar rse bera�rse tY�e gevtechnicad
engineer was nnt infarmed abnut develaprnents fhe engineer ntherwise
would have tnnsidered.
Most of the "Findings" Re�ateci in This Report
Are Professional Opinions
Before cnnstructinn hegins, geotechnicai cngi:i�ers ex�lore a site's
subsurface using ��arious sampli:�g aTid testing procedures. Geote�hnica!
eng[iieers can ohserve actuad srrbsurface conditinns onTy rr[ [hose spetif �
farations where sarnpding arid testrng is perforrner�. The ciata derived frnm
that sampling and tcsting wcrc reviewed by your geoterhnicai enginc�r.
whn the:i applied professional jzidgement to form opininns about
su6surface coneiitions throughout the sile. Aelual sitewieie-su6surfa�e
coiiditinns may differ - maybe significantly �- fram thnse indicated in
this report. i:onfro:it that risk by retaining your geotcchnical engineer
ia ser�e an ihe design team lhrough proje�t cnrnpletion to obYain
infor:iied guidance quitkly, whene��r ncedcd.
This Repart's Re�ommendatians Are
Confi rmati o n-Depen dent
The rccUmmcndations isieluded in this report - ineluding any= optiUns or
alternatives - are conFirmation-dcpende��t. In nther wnrds, they are not
final, �ecause the geoteclinital engineer who de�eioped them relied hea�i�y
an judgement and opinion tr� do so. Your geoTechnical engineer tan finali��
tlze reCpmrslenC�afions prt�y pltCr Dhscrviri�acti�ai suf�surfa�c condi[ions
exposed during coF�slructinn. If thrnugh nhser�alinn your geotechnicai
engineer �onFirms that the cUnditions assvmed tn exsst actuaily dn exist,
the recnmmendatinns ean Ue relied upon, assuming no nther chaz�ges ha�e
U�curred. Thegea�echnicad engir:eer who preprrred this repvr t rannot assunre
respor+srbilit}' or iiabi�ity for confirmation-dependent recommendrrtions if ya�s
fail [o retain tha[ engineer t� perform cnns�ruc�inn obser�atiQrr.
This Repnrt Could Be Misinterpreted
Dther d�sign professionals' misinterpretatinn nFge�lethni�al-
engineering reports has resultcd in costly proble:�is. Confrvnt that risk
by having your genteehnical engineer ser�e as a tontinuing member of
lhe design team, to:
• cocifer with vther design-teain memb�rs;
• hclp develnp specihcations;
• re�iew pertinent elements of other dcsign prnfessinnal.s' plans and
specifieations; and
• be a�aila6lc whcnc�er geotechnicaf-engineering guidan�e is ateeded.
You should also canlront thc risk of �viistructors misinterpreting this
report. L]o so hy �etaining your gcotcchnical engineer to participate in
prcbid and precnnstructinn cnnferenees and tv perform constrti�tion-
phase obser�ations.
Gi�e Constructors a Cvmpiete Repart and Guidan�e
Some owners and design professionals mistake�ily belie�e they can shift
unantieipated-suhsurface-conditions liahiliiy tn cnnstructors by limiting
the informatiUn they provide far 6id preparation. To help pre�ent
t1�e castly, contentiaus proUletns this prattite has �aused, include the
completc geote�hnical-engincering repvrt, atong with any atta�hments
ar appenciiees, with your tontratt docu�nents, hut be certain to note
caraspiruo�ssly that yo��'ve inrl¢�ded [he materraf for i�fQrinativn purpo.res
anly�. Ta a�oid misundcrstandiizg, yUu may also want to notc that
"informatinnal purpnses" means constructors ha�e no right ta rely on
the interpretatinns, opinions, cvnclusinns, pr retnitimendatioiis in t��e
t'eport. Be �ertain that constructors luiow they i��ay learn abUut specific
project requireme:zts, inrluding op[ians selected frnm the report, nnr}�
frnni lhe ciesign elrawings and specificatiniis. Remincl constructors
that tliey:nay perform their own studics if thcy want to, and be s�are to
allnw enough [i�ne ta permit them tn dn sn. C)niy then might you be in
a pnsitinn to gi�e ennslruttors the information available to ynu, while
rcqviring then� to at least share snme oCthe finaneial respoiisibitities
stemming from unantitipatcd conditinns. Cnnducting prcbid and
preconstructinn conferences can als« �e �aluahle sn tliis respect.
Read Respansibility Pro�isions C#osely
5om� client representati�es, design proFessionals, and eonstrurturs do
nat reali�e that geoteth:ii�al engineeri:ig is far less exact than othcr
engineering disci��lines. 'Ihis happens in pari betause snil aned rnck nn
project sites are typically heterage��eous and not ��zanuf'actured materials
with wel]-defined engineering propertics like stcel and concrete. That
lack of understai�ding t�as nurturec� unrealistir expectatinns that ha�e
resulted in disappointmcnts, delays, cost n�erruns, clai:ns, and disputes.
'1'n cnnfront that risk, geatethnical engineers commonly inelude
explanatory pro�•isions in their repnrts. 5nmelimes labeled "limitatinns;'
many nf these pro�isians indicatc whcre geotcchnical cngineers'
respansibilities 6egin and end, tn hetp others recngni�e their vwn
respnnsi6ilities and risks. Read theseprovisrons rlosely. Ask questions.
Your geotechnical engineer shouid respond fully and €rankly.
Geoen�ironmental Cor��erns Are � Co�ered
'Fhe personnel, equipment, and tethniques used to perfartn an
en�iranmentai study - e.g., a"phase-ane" nr "phase-two' environmental
site assesscnent - difrer significandy fro�n those uscd to perform a
geatechnical-engineering study, Nor that reason, a gentechnical-engineerir�g
reporl daes not usually pro��eie en�ironmental findings, conclusions, or
recommendations; e.g., about �he iikelihood of encountering underground
storage tanks or regulated �ontami:iants. L1nAn[ic�perfed su&surfaee
environrarenfrr� pro�le+ns have led te� prnject fai2:rres. If ynu ha�e nol
❑btaincd your owii enviro�imeiz{ai information aUaut tt�e project site,
ask ynur geatethni�al tonsulta�it fnr a recnmme:idation an how to find
envirnnme�ital risk-managemenl guiciance.
❑btain Professianal Assistan�e tn Dea� with
Moisture Infiltration and Mold
While your geote�hnical cngineer may tia�e addressed groundwater,
water infiltratiori, or similar issues in this rcpart, t�e engineer's
ser�ices were not designed, eonducted, or intended to pre��ent
migration af mnisture - including water vapor - from lhe soii
through building slabs and walls and into the building interiur, where
it tan tause mold growth and material-perforrnance deficie:�cies.
Accnrdingly, prvper irnplemer�tatron of the geateri�nica[ exgineer's
recvmmendaLior:s wi12 noi af ifself be su�cient tp prevent
moisture irtfrlfratian. Cunfrant fhe risk af moisture rnf dfration by
including building-en�elnpe nr mnld speeialisls nn the design leam.
Gevtethnicul engineers are not buiIding-envedope or mold sperialists.
�GEQPRflFE551�NA1
BUSiNE55
< 1 ASSOCIATIDN
Telephone: 3fl 11565 -2733
e-mai1: infa@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org
[:apyright 2D19 by Geoprnfessivnal Business rls�ocia�ion iGBA]. Duplication, repraduc�inn, nr r�pying of this documen�, in xhole ar i» part, by ar�y means whatsoeWer, is strictly
prohihited, except with GBA's sgecific wristeci permissian. Cx�rrpting, quoting, or orherr+•ise exiracting k•arding from �his dorumeitit is prrmitied only with ahe express wriiten
permissian aFC;BA, and only far purpases ufschvlarly research or baok review. C7nly memUers ofGSA may use this darument nr its wnrding as a rnmplemen� to ar as an element
of a repnrt of any kinc�. r�ny other firm, individuai, or ather enti�y that sa uscs �his dacumrni without 6eing a(;BA me�nher �ouid 6e �ommifting negligent
i�� �I E
f N G I N f E R i M G
August �, 2�2'i
Mr. Keith Janes
IM5 De�elopment
5690 Watermelon Road, Suite �4�fl
Narthport, Alabama 35473
GEOTECHHfCAL ENGiNEERiNG
Eaamwo�Ks Cor��aa�
ENVIRON141ENTAL CONSULTlNG
CONSTRUCTIQN MA7�RlAL TEST[NG
Re: Addendum #1: Pa�ement Design for Ciholo Hills Parkway
Chapel Hill Multifamily
Fart W�rth, Texas
Rnne Report No. 21-24892
Dear Mr. Jones:
Rone Engineering 5er�ices, Ltd. �Rone} pre�iously �ompieted a gevtechnical engineering stutfy
at the referenced project site. Results and recammendations were presen#ed in Rane Repart
Number 2�-24892, dated February 22, 2421. In the original report, Rane pravided the pavement
design far "Residential" and "Collector" types �f roads in accordance with City of F�rt Worth
Pavernent Design Manual dated January 2015. The purpose of this letter is to provi�ie pavement
recvmmendations for the praposed Cibol❑ Hilis Parkway which is categorized as "Arterial".
We understand Po�tland Cement Concrete �PCC} pavement option �s being cansidered. The
pavement #hickr�ess determinations were performed in general ac�ordance with the "1393
AASHTQ Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures" guidelines. The pa�ement design
parameters used ir� our analysis are listed in Table 1. The recommended minimum pa�ernent
secti�ns are presented in Table 2.
Table 1: Rigid Pa�emer�t Design Input Parameters
Item � Value
Roadway Designation � Arterial
Annual Equivaient 5ingle Axle Loads (ESALsj I 30Q,OD❑
Annuai traffi� growth �°/oj I 2.5
17esign Li#e �yearj _ I 30
Reliability, R I g0o/a
5tandard c4e�iation, Sa I Q.39
Con�rete modulus of ru�ture, S'� (psi} I 620
DALLAS � F�l�T WOR�H � AkJSTIM � HOl35ipN
32�1 NE Lo�P 820, Su�T� 180 � FDRi WoR�M, TEXAS 76137 � T��: 817.717.1040
Addendum #1: Pavement Design far Ciholo Hills Parkway
Rane Project No. 2�-24311
August 6, 2021
Page 2
3tem Value
Concrete modul�s of efasticity, E� (psi) I 4,��0,�0�
�ra#nage coefficienf, Cd I 1,0
Load transfer coefficient, J
3.0
Initiai serviceability, po � 4.5
Terminal servi�eabiiity, p� � 2.5
Treated modulus af subgrade reaction, k(pci} � 220
Ta61e 2: Minimum Rigid Pa�ement Sectian
Road Name Street Categvry �-�me Treated Subgrade Concrete Thickness
Thickness {inches] {inchesy
Cibola Fiills Parkway Arteriai 8 1 a%
The concrete mix design should he selected ta meet a minimum modufus vf rupture of �20 psi
and a minimum elastic moduius of 4,ODO,DO� psi at 28 days. All other pavemen# related
recammendatians including pavement subgrade preparations sh�uld fallow the ariginal report.
Thank y�u far the opportunity to pra�ide servi�es ta you for t#�is project. Please call if you ha�e
any questians regarding this letter.
���►�t���
Respectfully submitted, � ���.�E•�F F�;�",, �� i
� .� �
�v�r� �':�,�
�Yw������r�r...��...r������Mi�a�a�
� LEi'Jt1�1 �
�......,......................./
� ' 43��IB t �
:
.
y ,� .�����a+.,,f � .
•.....•••� s
�" r y
Lei Wei, Ph.�., P.E. ����I311I���•T,��` Ri�hard E. Webh, P.E.
Te�hni�ai Director of Engineering �$ 0 5eniar Geate�hnical Engineer
Texas Engineerir�g Firm Registrativn Nurnber F-1572
APPLICATIQN FQR
FL��DPLAIN DEVEL�PMENT PERMIT
wamp of owr�er ar App�icant iM5 Development
Address of �rrner 5690 Watermelon Road, Suite dUd
iVathport, AL 35473
a.� �o�r�oz�
T�ephone Na g� i-562-3350
Nearest stream
Dosier Creek
Locatinn af PermR Atea (Address or Legal Description}
10155 M. 5aginaw Bl�d
REED. .lD51AH N SURVEY Abstract 1382 Tract 1D & A1497 TR 2C
PURR05E OF REQUEST: ❑� Excavatian ❑Fitling ❑DredgingarMining
PLEASE TYPE
Permit No. F� P-21-D�245
O(Fice Use Or11y
] Appraved x❑ Appraved
W ith
]�enied" ��itians'
p� i� 1fl.14_21p�� p�t: 1p_21_2U21
Prooessed By: D5
Approved6Y r -�2l�L ��'L��
❑� LltilityConstruction
❑ 6uilding Permit x❑ 13rading ❑Paving ❑drilling Operatians ❑ Other
BRIEF DESCR[PTION OF PROPOSAL (Aitach separa4e sheet it needed)
This application is for 2 diiferent areas of work. Area 1: At the NWC of the site, grading reiated to the oorrsNuction of a gas
well aocess dri►ie adjacent to tfie floodplain. Area 2: Directly west of the existing Shosfioni Dri►�e, water and sewer lines are
pro posed.
COMPLETE APPLICABLE QUESTIONS:
1. Tataldrainageareaoiwateroourse ����� acres. 2. Reguleioryflaadelev. ❑✓ Natavailable.
3. Has site previouslyTlaaded? ❑� Yes ❑Ma 4. Is site subjectta flaoding? ❑� Yes � Na
5. Is sefe ecaess ayailable during times aT flaod7 ❑� Yes � Na �(lnknawn
B. Es the prapasal within the designated Eloadwayi� � Yes ❑✓ Na ❑Llricnown
7. Have all neaessery priar apprwal permits been obtained Tram federal, state ar lacal gavemmerital agencies?❑ None Required
� Yes ❑No [Ii no, explain; if yes, provide copies of approval letters or permits.J
ATTACH THE FOLLOWING IF APPLICABLE:
7_ Two (2} sets scale drawings showing loeation, dimensions, elevations of existing and proposed topographic aNerations, existing and proposed structures,
lacation relative ta flaodplein area.
2. Extentta wfiich watercaurse ar natural drainagewill be altered ar relacated.
3. Supporting hydraulic ce�ulstions, reparts, etc., used as a besisfor praposed impravements.
4. Lowest 1loor ele�atian {induding basemerd] of all proposed structures_
5. Elenation ta whicfi any non-residentfelstructure sfiall be flaad proofed.
8. Certifirstian b}+registered praTessianel engineer ar archired tfiet flood praafing �riterie are met as set farth in 5ectian 7-347, Sub-5ectian b, ardinanoe IVa.
DURING THE OCCURRENCE OF A 100-YEAR FREDUENCY FLOOD WILL THE
PROP05AL:
1. Fteduce capacity of channelslfloodwayslwatercourse in floodplain area?
2. Measurably increase flood flowslheightsldamage on off-site properties?
3. Individually or oombined with other existing or anticipated de�elopment expose adjacent
orooerties to adverse flood ef%cts?
4. Increase �elocitieslvolumes oF flood waters sufficiently to create significant erosion of
floodplain soils on subject property or adaoeM property upstreamldownstream?
5. Enaoadl on floodway causing i ncrease in flood levels?
6. Pro�ide oomoensatory storaoe ior anv measurable Ioss of flood stora�e caoacit7i�
Into. Not
Yes No A►�ailable
❑ ❑✓ ❑
❑ ❑� ❑
��
��
r ■n
�
❑
FL�OQPLAlN DEVEL�PMENT PERMIi
T�e City of Fort Worth's Fkoodplairr Permik Program is authorized �y Section 7-318 of City Ordinan�e Na. 11998, adopted June 13,
1995. 7his permit is requ�red for ali develapment taking plac� within the area of the 14d-year flaodplain (special flnad hazard areasy
as shawrz on the current Flood Insuranoe Rate Maps and Flood Boundary-Floodway Maps, published by the Federal Emergency
Managemen# Agency [FEMAJ. These maps are ava3lable for puhlic inspe�tian in the Er�gineering Qepartment, Municipal Building,
10Q(3 Throckmarton Street.
Failure to obtain a Flvodplair� Developrnent Permit or �iviating other provis�ons csf City Qrdinance No. 11998 or the conditinns
described within the perrnit constitutes a misdemeanor arxi upon �onviction, a person, f�rm, ar �orparation could be fined up to one
thousand dallars �$9,�00} a day far each day thai the vialation accurs.
I understand t�at the condltians which may be stated for permit approval or the prfl�isians af City flrdinance No. 11998 may be
superseded by ather prauisions of City code or po[icies.
I further understand that t�is F�oodpia�n Qevelopment Perrn�t daes not �onstitute final appraual until all developrnent requirements
piaced on the properry have been met. These requirements include, hut are not limited to, City �anstru�tion plar� appm�al, platting and
carnmunity facilities agreements. This proposal shaH be subje�t #o anychange in floodplain develapment policy at the actual time of
deaelapment.
Applicativ� is hereby made for a permit to a�thorize the activities described herein. I hereby certiiy that 1 am familiar with the
inFvrn�ation can#ained an this application and tv the bestvf my knowledge such informatio� is irue ana accurate, I furthercertifytha� I
possess the authority to undertake the �ropvsed activiry. I understand that if my applicaEion is denied, ! ha�e sixty [64} days fra►n the
date of such denial to appeal the ad�erse action tv the City Plan Cvmmissian.
• ,,�' �� .
Signature afApplican# or Authorized Agent
❑FFICE iJSE aNLY
FLO(}DPLAIN AREA �EFINED 6Y: �❑ FEMf1 ❑ COE X❑ FLOO� STUQIES ❑ HIGH WATER MRRKS ❑ OTHER
FEMA INS. zONE A �EM� i„U,P Na. 48439CD�45L FLODD ELEV. Wal"1�5 GROUM� ELEV. V�rIeS
FL4dD PLAIh! STUpY �S-��-O�2g, F5R-21-�05 PLATE I�O. FL�OD ELEV.
�nnl�Ir14NS FOR AQ�R4VAL" aR REA54N5 FQR DENIAL""
*Excess spoils will be remo�ed from the floodplain.
THIS P�RMIT SHALL ExPIR� TW� YEARS FFtOM THE DAT� DUT ON PAGE 1 ABOVE
ia i
O �
W
� W ^
�
� �
G] � g �
� �� �a �� � y �
a � �$ � �� °� �'� `0�
� �— c m t9 a � � � � E � � i �
,,, a E � g� m r � @ — � J � �' a � � �
7, ���� �� cp o. �i r�A s— y a � o
� � � � �r�n �� R �r�nci� ��-�� ��, �����BR�$8�����BR�$Sw�� ���
�❑ o a c> >='•�if� � c°� a rr � ry I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I`I � I I I I
I I I �.Z.r �
r �� �
k
�
N
S o
I I
O
O
� ���
I I I I
��j� � � _ 1 n ...1� F'- . ,� . .a .� } i r � . . .
y �.
y •. I � + �' :�
�� ' :�r ' � �' -� _ �w
,.� �f�4 r �', , �a�r _ Lti ' _
' � ' �• ., � s ..r ����I " � � � .
� � fil.. a. . •��
� � il�. � �:: `•tj_'�,I. 1 .�' .
��� nll �� 'f:�l /� ±kt !. rl � . �� � . _
• . x}�!� � J � . � "M f 7 r-.[ff :.�
�M1 r- S9�' y � - �_ ��
y ���' 7l �'.. `r i.i,� ' ���; •� �S-
�� � � � ' 7��_, �r �5�{d - ;� � ` _
' , � �. �,% ' .:� '�, .�4�; L'�''� •`�•.�az I
� r hy � �: ,y : . I t':'..., ;! �
r" �, �`a ..�' oif.'�'-:�..,,�1: • - •�` a ,' '.,��
.��,, • 6y , � � i�r-�.
`� '.- � ' ,�� � ;;�r� � �� - 3� -?;'�
�i `� - a '�.; '�';� . h''' _`
F * ��.. �. � .� 4 � . .
, �� !r�t�; ,. rhr ,�}� � ,:.i'�-
is �j � k�'.;'N1�n,�, ��J•',' I ;��
:ti V S! �7��y' - �. 'C-• �F'_�' 1' , w �^_
` I �i�.• ,yn��.
� 'I ,� � � _ �-.� j s . '�.:il.�� _ . � � � �'. . - '
*�.;� ;x, . � � �,
F � } 4J � �.� �`� - .
I A . ..�_^�����5 _ -
t '� �h.. r �' -- �� tl . .
��i 4 �± , - y,,�� ��""-�°'� r�4_ �' . {`t. �{ � •, �' r.� -
f� ��� � { '•__ �_ _,� �� :�'�; _
r{� M �
Y ��� ,� � +' '���- ��ir�'.'�`'� �,Y'. -� _, �'}. -:
�'.� � --��.- �: �r l ��'z ��.' . -
��"� �-=,;,��� .:� ., ,. ;1��,��+.-
,� : _a .. ._ � -. 't v,_ •; �,� •. ;, . .
_ �.`+�,"� .._-•v;,� "�''` �. .
��� _ � ��J �i . y1.
�- _a s''..�"i� ,`��.:� }�'"..� �.
ry=.,=+ - �� ' ` ' ?; . Z �" � _ ,
Fr,�-- . �• �. r_' a'r:: �•: �:.:� � ' ��
. � l � .ti . ;'.
�.I ;�� �-� ` � _ ..- . : �, . . - � .. .. ,� ...
��r � _ _ _ _ � � :� • .G �„t7' `� ` r . *���
-- I .�t�� v _ f�.'�- -s• .��.: Fr� �� �
�.`� �- ;i�'-r ' � � _�� '�''.4 •��w��` � s',y� . - .'� � -S
A . - It. ,•�� � ' - ~ .. _ . _'�.w . :"�y Y�.
_T1'r ._ - . I_ — �..� � - � i. - - ' . . 1. • y�
�- . ; M �, I� .. ar��7�='1 i
� � ... ,. a ,k• ,?� �� . . � e . ^' :��: `_+' �y �
�'l '.�� _ •� , � .� r.}��y - `-} �} • �'.4-�'ti '} ..
,. 1 •
��: ��''� �
•�•� �A
�. �, ,�;..`. ..,
f � �� } r �`f � �i � i
, .J; , +, �?:
i ; r; ",
kr
: � ti , "y 1� ,+ .
��
� �-�
'`.'`� . . .r ��- ,�f ,
r. _.�'� �-• �_ �4��..
.�� '� -+�� � �1�
A�'� l . +�_' � ���' �-_ . . il\ � . . :' _ . " •_ :` ��r-." �' � � .,
�' a...f. .'. �' '.�� b ,�a_ �' ' '�n.'
J , y�.�'�R� .. f. •- - _ • -- . . . � e_ �<:�r 'x.� '�-.�..
::ir -- '� _. 'Pr � . � � "- - _. CJ' 4wi�v�s ..
��� � � , r �::��+, ' - I ! : .t� : r,. � .c . . . J . � a i��
tl _ j f_ .�.�I��• �. V� I
.i � . . � .��. . . _ ' �: ��' •. _ �i . ' � Y�
� :� ,�.�L'.�-�e- •:,- '�.��� Gt�T�' •'�
,. µ� -. '�... ��-` �, �,r.r ; ` ' k
.� �. . _ , . ;��.:. � _ r�-'�'��,•: t� - ��'��^-�e.cci- �-�'�+��
. r�I�'� - � '.� _� ti�� �:. `�. ri': Y y1 �
-� �f' ,.�' -{s
. I�. ' . .. i'�l`i _ + ' . � . . .. . - . _.. � . t� ,Y_ra _ ��
T•
. y 1� � '�.Y:i� \ , f �. .�' . •[ .: �-S i.'l'_ .�'
�y[� t q - _ } 4,� riP. 4. � H
1 f` J� _ � . - ' ,*"�' ; _ _ n , � _ ` �'' 'y
I;l' ' ,`',- L_ �..'.1'' � �� �j- .
� w ' � - .�. ,� _ '�
L ��', f � � ,
�~- J'�'�}'f ,�''_' . ,..� ' , � .`���`' ' F�- , _
�, y ,r r ' � �.
�"�R - r', �;;.' • - � � .,Y�:�i:� -`'��"�.1
� �, - F��, '. �' . K. �.: r.�,��7'V r��.
..� � �r � � '� �' :. ti � � ;� ", - _ . . . _
� � � � 1��5��-. . 1 � �'
T� -��; �'� . .�.t �.� z �: _ _':,, ,, „ . . +,F. ,. �.,
'� . . ��,+�•/�� y � p��y •_ - � • . �>�l�.'.�" .. � �
_ • �J -;�.��: - � '�.*.°
`�� 4 ��<' S ..�T',�� .r.- - i �-�--r.�.L!+
� � � - =i . . � _- - . ' �_
,. -, •• ►a -`�.� . Fy j , � ` Y� , .
^ � `
N ,�` ;
Li w
;t.=* ' �::� �/' :'laL.::�.'��i
. ti. . �k�' �''�_.� �w t�1� . �n,_�
�t 4f,Jt .�d.F.
rF':..
t,`�i � �- �: .
� �. .
��:.`� . . . .� i
' �.
��� '.. _�C�� .r
0
m
$' v
s�
��
�
��
�r
O
� ��
��s
���
� y N
� � �
�6 n R
W�
� ��
_ � �
n
N �
on
°�'
p W CO
� C a
� � d
C C
w`a y�'
��
W
�
9
�a
�
N
d
d
lL
0
�
0
�
O
G
O
N
0
�
x
c�.�
Q
O
_
d
O
_
�
�
O
C7
O
H
C.7
Z
Q
Q
C
1L7
;.�� ,_:� '`i� . .
. ;j{.
i,'�C�pfj� �"-
'�'_ �
�-4.;. � i;r
c- -
� : ' , --
N. . � �� .
' � 1
� � J_�`- � � � ,�
_-- � � �
I �' �
m
N
� � I
�f � f � ^. ^ - � . - . - - I Q �
� �
.' � / r, // � � II �
f - — ¢ ii �
i/� � �Q '
/� / �2
H�h1l DRIVE ' � I , �
� � � _� �
�,
� �_
� � a ' �
o� �
-�` � —� ` 11 � � � �,
y' 1� �1'�'} _ U '� �
~ — ��`�
�
� �� — — �� — — � -- II4i1j a
� N oot�� � ','h�
� +� M � M UO+� � M� ''�
S5 � SS � SS �
�� �S � �� �
�-�` ��� � � � �
�-- � � __ �
.
. � .,
� �
1 � ` j �., �
y I ` � �
� � 1 L l, � ``� �
1 � � � �
1. � � � �
, \ \ � , �
\ � �� ` �
� ` � � ,
� ` � -� \ �
* ` � I \! � � ` ��.���. E
� '�
� I � ` ��` , -I
i
[L}u4!4x�d�� 4�DOZSWIL�GI4x311lnI�1�aO�alSeWi�W IIIH lade4� LO�aZSWIl80fL=�
1 �
� o
� �
� --
�
G
r •\
O - - �:..._ o
a
.� _;. + �
;. � 4
� �
��;� _�.
-er`�. 'n..-� -� _ Y _
, � �/ � .
;; ;'..--.._... �
.
�°°
_ -_ --- ' �� -
, _
� � +; - .'
r
-��;
� ---
�
1;,' +-
�
_
� ....... .:::::.. �--. r`:- :.- r
� ' ~ - � z
r � �
I � `� �o�
mwa 4
� � � Y�Q
_1 ��� �
Jd �
� �
� -
■ 1
I ,
� � �, --- �
I `
, � �� � � �
��
. , � `1 1
' � 1g `
I �� I. 1 r� � 1
I � ` � �
� \ - �� � � � �
� I
� '
�
❑ � ;
i 0 '� � I
� '� '
� � J I
I � f _ �I
I �
1
j f '� '.
! %4 1 � �1
,¢ , �
W 1' � 1� �
I �
w
¢ �
J � t� I � ,
��Q '
.-�
�
�
r
o ���
o � ��
� — ��
r�n��°
�=oo
x
w
❑
L.L
� � + � ��.. . � �
� z
�' , �' ' � ,, . � �
� � ; ��
� i J
; � f A`J a
. � � i i 1� � YR
� + J � f o
� � �r � � ; � 1 W z
l � f ; ��
! f I ; -� � _
� ... ... _
Wtl 6Z 8 4ZOZItr4101=awJJalE0lold
[L}u4!4x�d�� 4�DOZSWIL�GI4x311lnI�1�aO�alSeWi�W IIIH lade4� LO�aZSWIl80fL=�
— — -- —_~ ! � � � � �� �
v- �
...o �-� " _ �
� � �
� � � — ' � � � � `--
_ � �
.� 'i
� � � • f $ 1
� � �
_ f
i
/
�
�
- .1
r
�
�
�, ;
�
o2f ,
C)
J �
J
Uj U �
-} J �
,� � �
� q rn
�prnH
���U
rn�u❑�
�oo� -�
a�zo
=Y� �
��� � l
~ l �
�
� �� ,
� �
� �
� 1
� ��
1
r �
�
*��
� r �
��._�
1 �g � �
� i i
\ • � � � � ` � . ,,
�� 1 f � -- -- �- r �
�'�,� � � _.. �
1 -- _ � � �-- - - - �-- �
� �� � � � � --__�
� � � __- .
0 _-
� � I r _- j
z � � ' � � �—`
1 2 � 1 � � � � _� � -- -- -- �
�. � � _
� � � _-_- -
-
_ . � �f ,�s
. ��r--_�j � r►
� � �
� �\ � �.. �
� � �\ �\� � � �
f � \��\� � �
I �� �
f�, ; g f.
f r � � �
� �� i �
/ J f
!
f -'
f Z
s� I ' � ` ��
��r o
� �
� ;` o
��/f� �
0
� ��� � � � � � � � LL
� � + '� � I
,� I + � i�� � U r
J r7 W
J � � JYc�
\�l + , �� �pa
r��� � � ;� �mz
\\\�l � i o � �z �J�
\\ `, � q � � f
Y � = 2 Q
�` ! � �o- - �ox
� -o w��
� � � �o �o�
��; � z = m O
�� � � = U U
,, � � �
� � � � � r --- -- -
� � ; ---
I
y � ,_� �.��
-� l � ' �
_ .
-�_ } , � �
_�_ , i� ♦ :
� �
�-a�,� ,
_ , �, � o
0
+
�� �
-. � ;` � � ■
,. '4 _.. ------ _ --- -----
� -- - i �
�� 1. \
�' _ �' I�
f� '' �
� � �'! � 1 \
- .
___ -_ ,.
J i � �o u' �
x N y
�... ' l � �
�. t
M $ l
�.l.xg �1' ' '\ �
� � �
� � � l NN �
1
, � — � � i' � �
� � �
l��. .. � � 1
� ■ �� � � n �
.
r4j.
1/
.-�
LL
�
��
o � ��
� - ��
r�n � �°
� = o0
�
L1J
❑
�
� �
� z
0
�~
a
� J
a
�
J o
Wz
�
� J
—
... ... _
Wtl 6Z 8 4ZOZItr4101=awJJalE0lold
. P E L� T� N C�RPDRATE QFFIGE
9800 Hillwood Pkwy.
Suite 25D
I1 L A M D 5 Q L U T I� N 5 Forf Worfh, Texos, 76177
� 1 I I 817.5d2.335D
nnEnnv�aNaunn
To: Da�id Aughinbaugh {Meritage Homes}
Fram: Lind Vlleb�r {Peloton Land Solution, Inc.
❑ate: June 17, �a19
Subject: Cik�olo Hills Phase 1
This memo descrikae5 Section 404 permitting 5�enarios a5sociated with potential waters of the U.S. for PhaSe 1 af
the Cibolo Hills praje�t. Cibalo Hills is a prapased residential de�elopment lacated in the City af Forf Worfh,
Tarrant �ounty, TexaS {Aitachment A, Sheets 1 through 8}.
METH��S
R site visit was conducted at the project area an ❑ctaber 1 l. ��l S by Peloton Land Solutions biologists. During
the site �isit, a pedestrian surwey using a modified point-intercept and 5ample ob5er�ation point method wa5
candu�ted. The lacation and limits af potential waters af the U.S. within the praject area were calle�ted and
recarded using a Trimble Geo XH Global Positioning 5ystem which has suk�-meter post-pro�essed accura�y.
Cantinuous lines were mapped alang the centerlines of ephemeral streams, which were used to determine the
length of the streams. Periadi�ally, the Ordinary High Water Mark {�HWM) was recarded or noted alang the
centerlines. The appraximate width at the ❑HWM was multiplied by the length af the stream to determine the
area of the stream. A continuaus line was alsa mapped along the ❑HWM of the apen water feature. OHWM
indicators ok�serWed in the field and u5ed to determine the width at the OHWM of the strea rrr a nd pond included:
{1J a �lear, natural line impressed on the bank af the 5treamlpand. {2J shel�ing alang the bank af the
streamjpond, (3} destructian af terrestrial wegetatian, and (4} the presence af litter and debris.
In addition, the line k�etween uplands and wetlands was mapped to determine the limits af the wetlands within
the proje�t area. The data �ollected in the field was interpreted using ArcView, a geographic information
system. Presence af hydraphytic �egetatian and changes in soil types and �haracteristics were u5ed ta
determine the boundary k�etween uplands and wetlands, in accardance with the Great Plains Supplement ta
the 1987 Wetland5 Delineatian Manual.
R ES U LTS
Potential waters of the U.S. lo�ated within Phase 1 af the Cik�olo Hills project included three ephemeral stream5
and ane herk�aceous wetland �omplex. There are twa raad crossings associated with Phase 1 af the Cibolo Hills
proje�t {Atfachment A, Sheets 9 and 1�}. A summary of the impacts associated with the twa �rossings is included
in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of Potential Impa�ts to Waters of the U.S.
Potential Waters of the Linear A�erage �Cep �
Crassing U.5. Classi�cation Length� �HWM2
feet feet [acres}
Crossing 1 5tream 1 Ephemeral �23 12 D.D47
Strea m
CraSsing 2 5tream 1 Ephemeral �a4 5 0.020
Strea m
�Length ond oreo were calculated using ArcView, o geographic information system.
�Represents an aaerage width at the OHWM. Hawever, actual widthswere used forcalculatians.
: Uiii y4Uiti�H i FNISCi] P.V�IIN i LA� Yc�AS f'LLQ7�C�€VLAiJU.CtiJCvI
SECTION 404 PERMITTING SCENARIO
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials within waters of the U.S.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is tasked with the responsibility of administering the permitting program.
The type and amount of estimated impacts to water of the U.S. associated with Phase 1 of the Cibolo Hills project
would necessitate a Section 404 permit. Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 – Linear Transportation Projects appears to
be the best permitting option for Phase 1 of this project (Attachment B). NWP 14 authorizes activities associated
with the construction, expansion, modification, or improvement of linear transportation projects (e.g., roads,
highways, railways, trails, airport runways, and taxiways). In order for impacts to be authorized under NWP 14,
discharges cannot cause the loss of greater than 0.5 acre of non-tidal waters of the U.S.
Under NWP 14, each crossing could be considered a “single and complete project”. A “single and complete
project” is defined as that portion of the total linear project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer
that includes all crossings of a single waters of the U.S. at a specific location. For linear projects crossings a single
or multiple waterbodies several times at separate and distant locations, each crossing is considered a single and
complete project for the purposes of NWP 14 authorizations.
A pre-construction notification (PCN) to the USACE Fort Worth District Regulatory Branch is required when one of
the following occurs:
1. The loss of waters of the U.S. exceeds 0.10 acres; or
2. There is a discharge in a special aquatic site, including wetlands.
Additionally, The USACE Fort Worth District published Regional Condition 12 within the 2017 NWP Regional
Conditions for the State of Texas. Regional Condition states that compensatory mitigation is generally required
for losses of waters of the U.S. that exceed 0.10 acres and/or for all losses to streams that exceed 300 linear feet.
Mitigation thresholds are cumulative irrespective of aquatic resource type at each single and complete crossing.
Notification to the USACE Fort Worth District is necessary prior to commencing activities under NWP 14 if impacts
exceed 0.10 acres and/or 300 linear feet of stream.
It appears that the two road crossings could be permitted under NWP 14 without the need for a PCN due to the
fact that impacts are less than 0.10 acres and 300 linear feet and no impact to wetland or other special aquatic
sites would occur at either crossing.
Storm water best management practices should be incorporated in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SW3P) for the project at the road crossings to prevent migration of sediment downstream. Additionally, Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer to
ensure that cultural resources will not be impacted by federal activities, including Section 404 permitted actions.
Future phases of the development may require additional Section 404 permit authorizations, such as NWP 14 for
future proposed road crossings, depending on the type and amount of impacts.
The opinions expressed in this memorandum are based on our observations in the field, drawings provided by the
project engineer, and our experience with the USACE Fort Worth District.
ATTACHMENT A
EXHIBITS
Pilot Poi
�
734
s�'
�
��� 5anqer
II
I -128�
Bridgeport
�
Approximate Project Location
Spr[nqtov:n
—1
f
El F ca![rr---
�zg?r
-r
Dentan
�.
L ittl e
.��,
`"��` L��isvilia
Flalrer Mou�id
;t :
'Cvpp e�l
S authl �k e
ICeller CraEsevin�
�;Jlbe / � { C011eyvilte
I �� �
S��in3w � i;
__.-. -- ,__-._.-�: ...
_ 73D n��� - � _ II'Vffl�
Hakla�tii City
: �:•�;1
� •-•
; White if
Weather}ord �! Seftlement ��rt Wa!'th Gr�irtd P raii
___ •-'�, W'ill w+ P�rk . - N A1'ifn�t�r�
� �� r `' r �
Aledn�= � � 1 � :
��5�� � ��
B�T1 i7CO0i[ �� -�-�---,�._ _— -
- Forevt HiH
�
�•
�
B�srl esan
�,
37i`, , , �
�•
�
� �
4f ;�
Grandury '� i " •
Aiv �r3cl o
Ce�lar E
Ph �ti7vL e!d r
�
S
bs
� Y
Q
h1 i c� othi an R
p
- �
i �
�� . b
SHEET Nfl. 1 PreRared By: �
� Cibvl� Hills Phase 1 g
GRAPHIC SCALE ""�E "�E LdT� N o
s �cinityExhrblt �ij��' �°�° 5°�°°�,~5 �
� $MIIBS 960� HILLYVflOD PARKYYAY, SUITE 250 S
FflRT WflRTH, T;i i6777 �
Ciiy of Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas PFIONE: 817-562-335�
� � �. • i
a
a
�... ��,.�-� : E�
.�
. -- . _ . _ ,
x •
' ;.�
_- . __ _ _ . -- .___ ��•. — .. - ..s:�=, . �_ _ -.,- -
�� � ..� - • � �. �� ��
� �''�����.� � �.� � ����� ;
�h �'-� ii • �.l' ��j �a. • �• , ,�
} :Y'�^' iIG'..�J fi Y _ � .,7 `• / •�� ��'.` . -. . .
;.� :� ! . . ���� � f� �' _ ' + � . .
+� t,0._� � � �;"y� - - "fi;ii� ++� a � .{L, .
T �T µ� ,:: �: '"' ^� a'"��� ��j � i '
;�+ ':f'� .v �.A,r',i_ L � .� r: , _
��~• r,.^�' �'�'� . � ,.�� } ,., 1 � : ..
a,� � ''�,,�'' �� � 1 � � - -
���� � � +>�y„_, . . �'x i . �~ � ' . . . -•' .
�����, _ " rf � •� 4�, ♦ ,l�
.""� � � .� � .+ �' + � � �.. 'i. ` � '�� . ' - - {'• � � -
�� { •~� • A �� � t��j �
�. •� A.�' . ��. .Y i �•'i! . ,+ � S �• �4'S' ' .}/� �`�`
�^_ • . . ,`'- ` . c/ .�� ' ' L}i :� � � •'. �.. �" c. ' "' � - ,
- r - �, � '
� � ' ' . • ry } 9�' . ' y � - l '+" •
f i' �
_ � �.� '�� o
j ' 4 ^'� � l��= l.
.. li� ; .r' . � ' r� . � '\ � , ',��
� ,4-8' k ' "_ -�y._. '"�� a 3� 1 :i�, •`�. . � � �.
����'�
�
�
! - � - .ti. _ ��:�� � ' • �
° . . � � : r �, ..-, � , .: . _" r'..� � * � ; .. 'i
� � 4�
• .. , . _ _ . - , , '� �� } , , �
� �� �.
. �;,
' _ .: , - . . . : - , ; � . . . ,� , �;�----; �_
-.. . � �. , . '� . ;� ��
.. "� � � � �. . _ , . � � � � � �� E t ���' ,
. . ,.� . -
. �:, - ,
. -.. . � 4- � ' . .. , ' . � ���. 1 . . ' � j .
- ' _ � . . " �+� • �� A ' � � 'r..y,.�j..� .
� . - � �' '4 . w
. . . � �" . 4:� .
� � L.
' . _ . . . . . � � � ��l
"�� � ' 4 . ..r ' . • � ............... �'L� r �i �G�. �'-
,�� ��
+� . ^ " + � �..e
� �: �:
�.� �'*r ; ^ �•��w.f�'.h�� J •k�' J ' ' � I �� ,' i
''•�w ! . ' . - ;
�-�i�° �1r�M . _,+tii _ + •:� . � . ' �
�'
f � � _ t
� ' �.
� . _ ��. _ . • - , .. . -�3�+r� ..7M� ]Sr. Jr"�7/'MFi.`+�.. � i
� s< L _ � +?.aj � ,•.S'r.�ii.M , 4_
.�� , f. .rs:w } '-'.._4 J i.
� . * • � , '!1"x. - . �
� _ .�, !t - ��; _.�__�� �
_k .. ^ , . . � ~ . ,. , � �_ _ • 2
j � } i' t _ � �F-�-`� �
'.�•¢ �'�• r. , ��L�.�. P'�..�. 4
Legend -. -- ; �: � • � `� �� ;
� Proje�t Area ,+; `,�. '�`};. � . ;. �� :x � � � - �
- - - _ �� � 1► �
SHEET Nfl. 3 PreparedBy: �
" Cibolo Hills Phase 1 �
GRAPHIC SCALE ""�E " PE LdT� N
:
a ,,000
s AerialExhibft �ijl�' �°�' S°�°°�,�5 �
Feet 960� HILLYVflOD PARKYYAY, SUITE 250 {
Ci of Fort Worth, Tarrant Coun Texas FflRT WflRTH, T;i i6777
� �� PFIONE:817-562-335� ,
�� � , r �
���� -
; � � s` �,-
' �� ��:I:, �
4 41 � � ��
, r ' � 4�� �� �
�+ � __. � � . ,�,�� :
�, `�� �,� ,� ;
A
' ��}',',,•'
_ Si
: , � �r'r �,.
' � .
�, �"��, '. -,
; - ��- � _ '� =.k'�� _; � �, =�=� �
_ '� • ,ti . � • � _ �` �'v ,� �
t � -� _ . �
, � � � •-. ` � � � � � " �
�� � - - 1 � �_,��
— - 4 - - `,- .. . �+p. :. ��
_ . _ �•. : '
�' � '� ',R `yf�' ••l J` ! � ` ? ' i
�;;�,��f�, .,; �- , , . . .
-. � ' . _ .
��� } � ir- ;� �� ' � . � , � -. � ,
� 4 .. � 1�', ' , � { �- �. � r� ,` � .
' -ti � �� , t
. . f rr'14_ i, �I '; _� } �-,�� �
.+; ' , _ , � � `.
r« r' � , -. f' .�:
- - � �'. . ' • �' . fi
' rr"'�. `} y - � ` • � i
i �'
r�, ��� T� �. � • + �
. � �,� r� � : � :.� �f:�
�,` ' �� :'�� � � . r .
. Q.� r' � , �. �, � � �-- '
��� .. . S . _ � � • �
� ' � $.��,' �,
� ,= 1= _ r :' ,; ,��
; \ I. I $�� . r `j .� ��
. . { . _ r' •^� y,'
' � ',� .. . r'• - - - . I �' '� �:,..:� , � .
�� . J l� .' __'
. �. . . ' � ' ,-' ' ' _ �f ' .
� � f . .. ' r ` _
_ ;� �
y � `5 � ' � -
�.
� ., � �3� �� J
�
� _
� i
r '�r �'
; F .`
r
r
a'
.. -'�r
~� �
�� �
'�i
1��
�C
11
�
• 41
; �ly
�`
}t
f�
1L
�
��� �
i �
, ��Cr's
� �'.
_ ;� �
� ' �
' �5'• '�
f + r:_ � �.�
� . + `, f I r
i •�
� f
-. 4�
:-.f 7 ' �'�' `� . •
� � � �,�
+1 ;� . � � _ -� r; � . �. --� j _ .. .
'�� � - - - _ '� � l, , , r; �
- . _ -�� ,:;-.��.._� ..•�� ., � , i
• ! �'_ _ , . .�� - -
�
,„�}`��� ' � , - - l,'S.'f � `�� l �_ . � s �.� -
� � � - � � � `f �.
� ." � �` - ' �i
� � , -
Legend �' S ' _ _ - �
� Proje�t Area � . 4� , ' �� ; ��.,,
. ! � �0� �� '�� � .'� �, ,
SHEET Nfl. 4 �
GRAPHICSCALE "`�E
a �,oaa �
Feet
Cibvl� Hills Phase 1
L1SGS Topographfc Exhrbit
Ciiy of Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas
--1 �
' �. _ I
�� �
} 4. r �+ �
r"� � 1■
�l �'�
�
I �I �
I
1
. �� +
i
4
��
�' , ;
Prepared By:
` PELdT�N
IIJII� �n r� o Sq�y r i�HS
960� HILLYVflOD PARKYYAY, SUITE 250
FflRT WflRTH, T;i i6777
PFIONE: 817-562-335�
65
����. �. �� �L �� �
�` � ' � �. ��,��:�
' �Y .ti ;� ..a. ii+`"'�� .� 4�.
�� � ,��� 'k �
o,µ�{ . , � ,� �
��'� , � ;�t , ,:�
b ��, _ .y, `�. i ..
.' i
��+i� : ' � �•��..
�• ' '; �" � - � ,�"
. �
� �a�'._ . .. ._1 r.. . _ �i _ .R . �'i: � ..
I � � � s .
I �
_ ', . � l � n
�
, 15
� 1
f
��1 �
�`
�
�:.
�.
� � ,� �.�:G1 V
' , �.�:�r„� - . - r
w: e
�S_ �
Legend �6 �
- �,�
� Project Area '
USaA Denton C�unty Sail Type �
�' '�' G5
' ! � ,
�" . ' - -'�'
1 � � �'� �� �'.
` i}'� . y���` ».��_`�
,:.� � � ' l
k
�.+- �
_ �: � �. �
_ i t �. :. . ' ,
�, f �� � �.• „
4 ° ��s � � � ��
I '.��^.�� � � 61
;� � � �
" t '�.�
� _ :,. - � ,
��� '. �
1 � ��� ��
� .- t ,
� � ���' =r �. ,.
� � � ����� �:
„� - ,�►'�
�. -� .�''���7�
l = ��
1��=� �..
6, �
�
�
���+�" �' Sails Legend
- 1 Afedo gra�elly clay loam, 1 ta 8 percent slopes
15 Bolar clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes
61 Purves clay, 1 to 3 per�ent slopes
65 Sanger clay, 1 ta 3 percent slopes
66 Sanger clay, 3 ta 5 percent slopes
P dB �
'+ - , ,,.-_
,. . - ��='-i
�„ '.,i. n_ �
�� Y � � ,, �._�
v.:e. ,
SHEET Nfl. 5 � Cibvlo Hills Phase 1 repare �.
GRAPHIC SCALE ""�E '': PE LdT� N
a ,,000
6 5vrlSurveyExhrbit lijll' �°�' S°�°°�,�5
Feet 960� HILLYVflOD PARKYYAY, SUITE 250
Ci of Fort Worth, Tarrant Coun Texas FflRT WflRTH, T;i i6777
� �� PFIONE: 817-562-335�
x. �...- ::._, ,._. �.. -. �:s...:.:•. _ :. ;�.. .---� `'iY:i.�.r .
.,� ;:;�;� � �« . _ .� r-:.c�,��..' .� .-�. � ;.: ..-. � �. �..,_'`�' -
'� ��>:hi:,y . �r��� --e. . - �'�'�'�;��;�:.;"::�Ny : �: }� ,�� 4V.� :-
�. 'q"`- 'rx:: � �9�G�;.':. � :��. i?�;: .� .
... �•. .: - ,,.{��',��;;:= - ��ri �� ....��t,. - "�'� �;r�: � ,:- _ �Y� ,... . % ."��,��r
� • _ . . rr:����;. � �� "�.,A,,�;. ��y: _ � �
't; � ' .. r
_. . .�•� . --�i�-� �..1���� ��-- ,r" ,�.�. ?i
-�; � 6i:-0 _ , F �: ?k� . ''f���:^ _ �
.
= �.
.
,�
.
- r1-
. ,.,
d;. ,� �c �,�J:'�.'..''�b;` - ,:; \..,8�
�:$:'� .'c. _ � ':4:- �.x"`. . r ..ry -s�,,�q, �s�.,�=:.:. ��'� -
- .. �.r '-ti � _p„ _ �'A�. . ;Lj,. 'y � .� y, ^,:AI� - . ;:' �
�.: � '.-r,F ., - � . ?7i'�"� . - .��Y�� �`��; ��e�.... %�s '�'_ :�:
' .~ r �, - `�c 1,:�= •" , .� �i� i4
�
v.
L� s
�... .
, .: ;
w
:� .Tc`�� :.�:: -
. ... • �9 �. ..�_ �[ .�' _ _ 1 ., ��,�:��.' - _ '
. i. .., . ;,� +4 - ' - - - �. :. x� � .
�_ �
� . � .� - _— -- - _ -
, . . -... . .
.
�;-. �.. . , .
�
, ,. ,.. • ,. _> �,�
�i.: :. : '^' : � •.: -•.. ,..r: .� �•-� _ :X'� �i'ii'aq"P: . .
:
�,
�^
� , -� _ V. , �' • _ _ I � � �'.
.�:..�• �_ _ ::t�w• '��� '�•� pi`'.; _ �._��- ��.�t - �i Y�" �''f' -
. I� - � .. .::..,,.-
.. 3.� F,��.N •'?b�' p ' ..�I '�.�„ .� �ft `i �'�.' '."�..' . - '� .�s . �'. 'r
., ��. `�4: •r . .�;,; ��� ���Ai �-�:::-` ;:.'��: _ W�„__�;-..��..... �,1:; 1'�->'. ,_ ��:+ .�i::_
� - �;�.� . '� "� Sy. .��-, .. . . . r. if"" .. —•�' -�.- -
i'B-.'- - � � . - ' � �'r. •'�� � _ - _ -" �: n• r.. . , .. . . ,
. �c�^;;� .h , .: �`x:l�.
��:s.-,�.t��.}� �.� � -.��s.��
'� ,f', . �' ±�- Y;.:•.:�" I . ���4�
.. "�a'.: '_.���i, .. _ ��; i°r�
� �� �1T . ��L �� - ' � :�k:.�x;x:'� �` ��d ' __'
'�5f+"1." � '� .._ ''�.s�, `•....�..9� f � _ _
r '' � � -4r�• ,+.r� "�;.��., � >.�;:-, r�; ''I- -�� :y. f�.v'� '����!! ����`
n�:s;,.,� ,e� � �.5-'. �, , '. ":�•�::',..:..�.
: ?�,� i . � ' q�' � � �
- - - = �.:" • �: I ��; �:; _ = �;,.:F ;..�,
�: ' ��.; , �; �`� � '-= ; ' -
. :F � � . � y� - :�:: .�: � -
: ,.., ��;:.� ,: �:..
.�<::., .�,s '. � ;:x;:;.;�r,.��:,a..
,�, ��` 'a:� .�" ' ',. �::x:_"
.:: � r�:�� �;F;'.;._';: . .. ,
R� . _ . . ;: . a . _. �, � s� - - _ --_ - —. - _ _ .. . - -
.
:,.; ..
�..;�•�- <. •-- . _
_ ;�... - - - - -
.....
.. - -
•
`A�
.. ... . _.r.a . .. . ': � _
.
o4E �
� .. .
�'�.
3
.. . ... �::. .. " ' ti _
� .- ..,
4� A� .
: ,
" " )......� . . ._.. ..��J ' �y' �..''� .� .. ;Sj L r'' .
[ -
� '`""LY�4A' '■•'�' �. ..a�l i,, .ircs�' . x,::4e _ ;.�,. iy.�;7•..' _ I'
. _ .. ..: � ., �� � SI�
�'t.' �:i;.f.. ..:• . _ - - c .. :� -
.� T�
l: '.- ..:' . .:. :- . .
, -..`... :y ��- ' ' . ..L, � �iw �
..^, � .'. �... .' . . .:''a �.� ~�i!� ..:
� ' k.". � ,�1 � � ���Q
�� ��n � � � • �.
�'. �h _ .£�.. "" � `'f"" '
S:�•.- _ _ _.. _ x'w"�' ..... - . . . .
�. - . - ... . , .
_ �k.�'
n�.
��: _
� �. �.'F , �
"� A
�����•.�����.. .
. � "� .. . `�' .' �,�h'� ^ . �rcp�y^. � :�:A.
J.f �''-�' ' ' •'yp �� �'• ' . ' . ' .. -�4� � ._. �.�r'.„
" Y
Y�F.: � _�y z �,..- �.'`
��' ` _ . �'.;.: -,�'�. _.� s�.. �
�. - _ `_� _ � -:'ir. • . �� ��.. .=�;..�.. - - � - �ry�i+,
���� .i. ,�.., ;4:i:c:x�^.
::�'w� � � s'�� ,,` _ �� ��NS: 1� � -
_ ___� - .,�y..��� V� _ .. - ��-'4�
.f"'. � �� ,��:�..'..:.`:':'•'.:.'V '•t:., r'� �.:11i'�hi
'�;,`�:6��^ - �. �;':';;' 4:�.,.a�a•��...�`=.�„�. � � .,
_f 1 ..�._��.` '.i; •r.•�:
.::. . ,o��.;:yki.�'.";i�:
". ;. :. . . . . . Y �� ' �
, ��$_� . L .. _. . � s=a�_,y.�• �
. �.:..:��: �
���, ._, . .��.�'i "`�i�: �:✓ �� . =.e:.•.��;ril�� . ,��
�4i!c.k ' "'x' iv : : ; �.'1 :' �... �,•: "i '��` •.' ati
8� ,.'Z-,��',' :•Y," ' � .. -- .�:{:_�,�.• 52� ..'a,'
� z'�!.J�. i�A..".' l. j. Y�" ��' ''.�
Y ��f:.� �...-� ... '� ��_'. xi:'��.�.�-:.' .
� �,t. _ _ 'Yi.f:.:�'h �.�-
M g���ii_:.i� ..h
.
�-�f�o ',s.r� o"�. �{i1: .�y.,,A-a..�...�•��! \ °ia
�� -� �� �'Y ���- ��_.� -::., �
s,e , - i . . .� . f3; � � ���:t.,Y,;���
,a•- ;x"�:..., i
..�� . ��.`,'.� . k � . . -� .��� � - ': -. �, .. - �'�.: - ���,-s. �. - -
��'�: - : � . � .. � • - .. , - . . v.:� • - -.r _�„a,� . ..: .�.�... . � :.� ''�
.,... . ,�.. , . _
�:...,. , . .... �
.,
,' � . `+..wir�---4'�.r�..w
�x� .. . , . • ..w
, :
.. � �
.' .,, T :�3 ',.A
,��`: �. ��1;:� , � ".���:`;' :.• 'ti-h. � .,�
- .:. . . ,�.
_,._ . . . - - - :_: -
� � , . _ - . - _ - ; ��� -
.: . :::, . ... - ,-: _ _ _
. . q..T � � .� -�''.:..:..' �.'""..
;k-:�- .. 'a:�: ..R �� ; ..r,� .�:' . . ��� , �� _ - - . - - . �,-�".'e.'y$.
.� . .sr 4��"•w��`,�"'. 'iP;p+n .
,.. y.;;i,,... . . ,c� s.; -.... _- �. -- - _. e..,�,r:..x�•i
� ..�`{,.��_h ` :k� T� ";.-.;s
. . ... ... . ; . . . . _ _ _ _ . - _ _
. .� �..,..,,... -. ..- .... . , . -
. ::... �'� . ...�.'� � �.
r�,�,rA E :? , .: ' . ��.�A ' r�_ : ri�`� .. � . - "'+,.iY _ - _ e .. . � y��� ;'�:�SF:
�4. ., ., . . . _. . . . . .
. . . � � .�:2 . �z
•
, . , .
, . .. . :. � . . � . . . .
.'
�
�y
9L
�,
�, � . ... ... .,q.,. ..- .�. . . .... . ' '
. . .. . .. �.� .. • ., .
.. . .. .:
•'s `
r i :'. • .: ...':' : r�� ' - ''���c _ . . .y�...�� �
, ,
... . � ..: •:. '
a',. ' , j�'.. � �_ �_# - #�r: < .a '!"'" � ...
i`
� ��.3 .� . il .; �� � :�.
�� �
' a �:�. .��-, �
a .:, . . m. . ,i � .. . ... �� �-�`�
�� �::� ,� . � .a�,.,.„x,,. .. .. '%1 . , �
_
.. ;,;�:�� �::�?��-:.-..,ei,fi. _ � �. .y�. �M:.'}'�� .,�,• r�o-;` f'- '��• j�"�
a i_ V q v� �,. -;i�.•� _ . I f.
�k r.� i; •;;r`'�. N . ..� I ;711i:r,w•.
�,� r �a�'��? .a�'� �3�` .. . �� _ �• - � � ' �J -
tY � .�.kq, . nq :-'f+la,�."' -�r;,:�= �` - - F:;t. �:.�;� -�' ��. yq ,i.�.ii'i.
D� - .'.4 - ��;� .�.,.. i. '..e��;%,t- . �r:Y': ,u' . � wl�� '�' ai.:'.'r
�, � ,i:. : :�'.: �
r•
'.k�' z�'
. .. �.
a ,�w�:€�r�. F ;': ; + ./
�':i. - - �.���,., . '�`::.�e:>�_f . . . . . ��1�-..' _ . - -"�5�.
�;�i':r � �j• :��� � ���� � 'i: � .�.. .�..
. � . ��. .`:. .
� � , i;-�
,. �' •� .. : � ' T. � �.
.�:.. � � � C .. �;1� � � y�� ' � - -
9. _ 1 ? .y ,� �`•; `:a '. � y ""6 '�� :`4,
'�}���`:e:, t a 1�.: '� n':�. �y: ."�b,,} - _`k. �f. �.gra:..�.
�V��•�L'- . .'����.i.�. •.��I_�. �,�.`C�^ .�;�Z��n�%�� '.1�� ��y.. ��. �.�.., - b-..
+•�� _
�
^ .
- _ _ :�=i
i
. `-f ' 1.
'.'�..>,.�-Y''.,'".'.�a�'.�,' ,�`[1� I_:i �li'A::�:, ' �.��•' r�r':"'" -.'w?�--
:tS� r � � �i; �� . . s.as�E�•''
. �� �.
.�:: �:7. '1' - . �' ''��....
'
_ . $� �' ��A�� ; ��n,y ':;kiti -�::�.��}��:: �'.:v:'.. � . ... � _ _:r ; ;L_J;' _..: r: : '�
:. ..y;�.:: ..
.. �t� .., � .t • �..t.._; • . .
�:. ..y,��" ,:x.�"� - .-�.` "tv._'` '. ���.r«�:.� I.. ...
'".c%iv "�-�',' t��b'f�•�>' ��. ``t:'." ;"BN.•l�:
y �� ,%;; -{•J^ s. _ ' "`c�:=- -- _ -
y���,.tix'r.:•„ �s�r:.:,--'3<;;',h _ - I.'..::� '��`. i �' ,.�k.���.-.:.i;r•'�.. `..�' .�_,:=, -�;",,
: , .
..a::�r,iys_. _ s" _ �F�' . . .. ih..'A"'.. _ ��.2 ��.... - .`� �;�'::��:t.
.. .. c
�
. •:.;r�., . ., _ _
��.. � ��,�c;. i : ` . y -
, ;j i� �•.; - -
� !-5ry.it ":•d:li'� �✓li.Y•Y _'.' :. �:r': _ x� _ _' ::.���•,. �:
] %'• �:.�n.r:i.���,,. . �c . ..5. '-.:^�� .��' - �r:�#r. � .- •'.�.�- . . .'
�; � ..:. � . ..
� .. �g . � �. ' w � '� �x�
. .: .
�+,r.. r.?�,. . dw, � � "�z��� � ':xic:.. '��� �� '���,: �, ii .i
,i.����:f:` : d... g� ;,� "-�'�u - ; x"' I �'v��..
�'.?. - ��,'$'a"1" - �„�,�3:.. . �.�y.;;^�
- �:s�'�� ..�� `� -' � JN:..;E"T.,,., . � �i.:::;.�_:.' . . . '�'1 . . - .T..,:.;:
:E. e�?.A'��:��_eQ.��_ :�41. �� " '.:� _:-" � . _. . _ ti •"
�=:�. ��` �'� �r�.+..^- ...- _'%�:: ��.' r�� „�'.:' 'SIi3n..
'�'�.Y„.� '....... � _ �� V ' �,•
' +"+,�r". 5. y:. .�.�°�� >i �•-. V . �,;�.. _::„.. , . . ' t ' :�..Y - ; .+:.,-;!
�rr,a -'�"- _ - �•'1.11 ir5;!� �`: . � �`�' .
•,.
..x .
`1C
.
� . ... ..�,,,-.,�
:�: . : �=3:"r,:,r�
...-. ::�: .. -..:.-. . � _ _ - . �.
..n:. .�.:.�:..,�..: , �.� � '�la";�i" �� . �-.� :
� e..�.�„��� #�y�� _ - _ - _ . rx:'�::..�:•:...
_.. .. -
.�
V�:.
•�.,
r��r.,,, , : ..�. -.. . - . ---
.
8.�,
rq `'�:`,..
. .;...r:�. . .. ..,,�a� _
e
. . -. .:. �'C; �...� . .. ... _ _
..
::
T
w' i � ..�.
. . ...� ..���..: .:_::: ..: � - . ' - _
��
. sl JNS
� •�
. .. . .....,:�.. ..' "
..:.'�. . � - .
����� `��.:� ��- ' ' .�� l `' :�::. '
_§ V�^ 5 x_. v��' _ ' .a ;��'4,a�:`-s � � � 3. �^ _ "
; ;� _ _ '.;��' . ..a �t^G :.t'.'.. �; I i•.,: °..�;:�'.
s Il �. . . t`.:... � . , :i�_.:, {�:•.;: � -�. � t 1t ��
1��, ,Y Y�.,'.,.
'� .•.�' .r� •.:. �. �.rwvr �"�:. �,.,: •r.:: �.�`Y:M1 ~ . ;��`f'.r.
_'r:i� � e7��'� . :"e �'s. `:iC '�,,,,,�� ;;x�-:�.�;�C::_;, j � �xf�-Z:�'�'�.::;�:.�..���°S�-.r,r�, Rs
�-.0 �� ' F «.h�f'� .rc '�3�::`S__ . jY� ' 'y ��Y � .r�`',1�`�'�.�....., v '.��. I� - - ��dty7%'.:�
_ .
��,,.a �:.fie�•�' ^ W.y,. '.x�, �1.: �'��..j.:: � �'S�� _ - _ ^;''1<r I..y.
: S � . �. i � . seA�S',..'..�f x:�'
: �j". . 4h.�' �:: _ ��' i' . ��=fi �.. � g"j • � �•-::. - '•,.'��'. . .�� a.� 7.: •.::':._.�. ��:7�.
�:iT'>-' . G�k� 'ti:�m .r.w' :,.�.�. �! il'�.. �'J��. � . .:i�; "...4 . .
. . L.
, e � e '�g� ' r -�J, ..,1;''S':--: � �
[Hy.l� __1 ��C'-%- ;y .�.. ; �. � F'�:':. . ytiy . .k.:_.
- .�
.:. .. �..� , ..
.�i. ';d`; -
�..
. :�, . •'� ° >'7.:'
' ��::: v f i �:'t4i - -- ' . �S'.\ .. �t� . 'r 1
..�_ .. ..�. �:��. _
, . . . :'
A::.. '
r.
�
. .. . . ..: .. . .. - �;
_ .�._.. . - � -'�..�- �Q��';: � :�.�'..:,.. ..?.k '
� �.; •p;. �. - .
.� ��•-- ��� ':J- �_!'�' � '�X' .
�• - � - �9YS .i'• ;ti�'•.:s:,�r��'.� d`A"!}.
Y'�' .%��:1:::k:� -:.��'. :�:�,. :V.':^ :ig..': -
- ..-i .. r<f, = .. '� ' �sF.• •.:,�r ,. � _ �'� . l . T_ a.:.;.:_., n�,,; ^ _
�" ` .� � "� � La Y.� ��� ' �' � -
, `. ; ,
- '� :'. -
.-., .,
. '_ � ; s*�:; `�� .
:, , .,. .
� :.:: , . . .. . ' ;
,.
r ��'i -
- h:::�. -."�.-a:�°
. . ( . . � .-.:: c.: , "�: ' p-�- ..y�y -
� ";
V.. 1 :�� � ,5.: + ii3;:::�f' ,� .:��: �
� i2�. f 's'ai-` -- ' - •'l:�'F" �'r•c'. v'�; � - '::.:Y. .�.� w - �K.' '
u � - -.� � ,:� �_
, .. �.
.: ;. .
;: r-
� . .... . .,-� .�
- q�; � ��' �-. .�{�`•.' � �.;4:. _ ':� ..r,c�.:.'. .
,... . , . . ���-i
�
1
�
- �. - _ ��s,
,
r..i
. . ��
�-1 �. a..'.E.� y!
� � �� '� �q�'',,����. "j .-r: �.:.���� Y � .�Y�a:x.�''' ��•F;�k:�^:"�i� ��%;'';,., .
- - ...�. _�y.�3.. . �!Y-x- --„}� =;��'�::: e..H;�.......�-fJ :�i'%';i.'..3 "ti'i x�'-� ��:'�P� �R.
.. .. . ,,. . . �: ..�::.
Legend �4�, �:. - : � . ... � _ .�;=;-� _ -
�' f�'"- air .. ,.: � . :;�: ,��r �'• ^ ;
: .;.�.n�� ; .,�:' . +,�<'.=�.,.'.:`.'i,i::� �,
9 --- _.i3. ��:�`;ri:;� �0.. � 4 �::. �L ��.�r..:� � g ri
w.► '�'' �'�-}4�`:' .,. _- . � '.. ....: � � b'. � _,wr . ,`...� - . .. -P.. �. �y � ,�r
Pro�ect Area 'r � - �.., '-�.-. �:� � � �'� �. :c
,�a� ,� s� � �a '} - �
1 � . _ � `:�:: .�. �:�' �` _ _ t
� � .,� , _ ; s. �:. � ��� �- . � .t
' ��•y. ._Ri• _.�.. o-+.�nai :f..i:'.' . . ��:f._ _
�:FF�i: ::,-�� ' .2'��'',:� �.:: ...4. �.a:`���x L�, �",9:�.
� ;t: _ :�,i�#�,, . �•:r:z;• ;x:>. },..�-;.•,'.��t�,. �.�'�
;� : 1 . , ;:..�.:. ;��..;'.• �
.Y F`
Fc7 �:����� _ "..ys' i'`""'�.`. "�Ii�'}�;,:.`iF:�:.."[..g��"E- �.� 'ii�,
9i' i'
HUC �i�'( ,A. .�. _ ��,�•:.F.:._�.::�R:.;.: ,�,�;;:�. � A
- - • -� • '� .. .. � ir��:.. , �;�,;��, :^:. �,,�'� •a,�sa : .�.f� , �a
.� i , ��'•�? , ay., -� � w�. �.s.;_�' ". 'y's-.�.:.. °c'.�„`,:r�- � r '�',�,:. � � �i
��i%�' ,�' �� . : ��35 . J..: y., (��
� . �}-:..•� }.." .�..'a.c: 'eyt�ea :�iu:d:.`?ti�Y�.^iD.. � Si� - 3
� .
�'
.
.. :.
. ..... .ti: . - ..
' ' ' � ''��K�:'.. • . . :, ..
'rc -� . �: . ; .
. .. . � e � n- , , .. . .. . : �::., , :i
SHEET Nfl. 7 � C:ibvl� Hills Phase 1 PreRared By:
GRAPHIC SCALE ""�E '': PE LdT� N
fl ,
s HL1C Exhibit �I�II' �n�o SO�4r���5
MIIBS 960� HILLYVflOD PARKYYAY, SUITE 250
Ci of Fort Worth, Tarrant Coun Texas FflRT WflRTH, T;i i6777
� �� PFIONE: 817-562-335�
�
� q, � _ „� Y, _ .. ., , � - - „F�,.�.-�.���.�6,�
, _.._ - - � ... � 1 - .�"� r -_ - � -----� � �i
� " �����`�.
' ' ' `- . � •� �j � 1�5 • " ' _ "
/ a+" _ . , ` '� � .��'. i � .
f "�'� ' � -'�~ ~� � 4�.
�� T .1� . �, Y ti ���j M� 1 .� � ,
`� - ^_,� . � -u'� �
�,,. ' ' � :
���{ , , �- � ', '�. :. • ,
, '`i° "~r ;, ',+ � ■• . 1 � • � .+ `' -
'.: � I► �'f.-�,� �� ��'" -
r, '.,' r , � '• . :' .
... . �!' - , � � "� �.er , '. � . ... - � � . _.� -
�" ,.
. . . • �k� � ��� .. . ��u�' . � --
. . .� � ���� . • " '� * � _ ,a•�
.��"F° •y
_ - --i� :;.�, ,� ,. . �,•., , '�, "!•�
,. ��.^ �
i ti � � �t�� ,. � . 1 ..-:i:::�
a!- 1 . L . . . ��
i��� � � ,�
P
Leger�d
� Project Area
Fl��dplain (100 -Year}
Zone A, 1�D Year Floodplain
Zane AE, 100 Year Floodplain
Flo�dway (104 -Year�
Zone AE, 1 fl0 Year Floodway
SHEET Nfl. 8 �
GRAPHICSCALE "`�E
a �,oaa �
Feet
' `
�ti �s= . �
�
,�
� . • r+�
_ `_ r �
� ,.. ��� _:�'�
_ � �� -_� . _ '
k
y � i
_ — - �'i � !• i
_ i t �. :. . ' ,
�;—,- �"�`.��� :, ;.
�. ;�s , .� , ,--, ,
,,w _� -
, ��. �
� � - _� �'
, ��,.. ,. ,
_� 'A�/!4�' A
J �
� �• �� -� � �+ ^ � ', •
i.� i � ��Y • � �
�ti �� ���7
'� ?A� 9L�i�T 1 . ,..�
.,
;� �
;�-��
' •�
�
. r` Y �''\ ' '!� �� ' ..
i �
I � � .
..�� ,�
l- _ � `
���=� �.
, , ��.
.Mw'�..'+.��1/+i"'wir�lf�• , y� -
. : �.:i'�y � �a1.�1
•�' .
� „f4,• � . .�!
�� • • S f' f _ ;
.�•, r}-�:.:. �„, � 'F --
�- ..f�:.� � ��' . ' � �
� '�' .•:�� _.
♦�E1 �
-�i �
�" � �
Cibvlo Hills Phase 1
FEMA Exhrbif
Ciiy of Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas
�
�„.
�'
�
�- �
�� �
L. �
� + `
� � ' ' �.
� � }�' �
��
� a�� ;�
' , � �
'`�� �
, ,—�,,,,r,
._�_-�s--� � -
r,-� ti�
�i
Prepared By:
PELdT�N
IIJII� �n r� o Sq�y r i�HS
960� HILLYVflOD PARKYYAY, SUITE 250
FflRT WflRTH, T;i i6777
PFIONE: 817-562-335�
. . ,' ■ �
� . `
� •.
- , '" . , . ' � . .i ' ��1` 1. `}. e� `;
- �i � : -
� �
�� ,� �"� �_ +�-' �� �,•
+` r . ' �
�� �• �n � � _� '�
- �, ' � ��
. • 2 � �'. _' . . ' � � , p
Wetland 2 "�
�z.., �
� �
�
:�� .
. `� , - � �
,• , - `��;� ' -,.� �
5tream 2 � •
Tk
�
. +, , � 1,.
�� .. � �1
Vlletland � -r , , _ 4 � � ,
�� � �
. ,
Stream 1
5tream 2 . � �
_ , s� 1
, . ��; j� ,t
� ra � . �
��: / . .. � . . �
Y �
. �
�
i {
l
[
x
Legend �
� � Project Area �
Stream 1 b 5tream 1 Ephemeral 5tream �
4
�_ �:, Herbaceous Wetland '
Potential Waters af the U.S. (Future Phasesj �
;
�
;
SHEET Nfl. 9 � C:ibvl� Hills Phase 1 PreRared By: 7
3
GRAPHIC SCALE w�E Pvtentia� '�'E LdT� N a
I���I' �Ar�o so�Uri�Hs E
� �Feet � W a t e r s v� t h e U. S. E x h f b l t 96pp HILLNIflOD PARKINAY, SUITE 250 S
Ci of Fort Worth, Tarrant Coun Texas FflRT WflRTH, T;i i6777
� �� PFIONE:817-562-335� ,
s � �� . . � — - - - .' 's
�. �
, � � i. ,
. a �A
i
� `y:
r �
- '
�� j'� � _
a
� � �'� �
,�� ` ;t
;t - ..
.Y��
� � a i
m
,;11 ��� � w+•••* � / �� �'��'����� �
:��� . ■ �:y� � :.�..� �
;�� ti�,.,.,�� *�.� �,��,,.� • ` �� _
i;��� �� �t •,��v'.,+.� �� ; i �� ���•
R��� �i��. + ts I ��� �r
►y►F..., i s��� \�{,�
* � R'` �Ck�.�• �� ` ���,� � ' *•�� � \«��*
r:1�1 :Ir.1� ��:' .►. �.I_ \ t�'-� �- �
Sources= NA I P 2016 6ate: 6/17/2019
ATTACHMENT B
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 14
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 14
Linear Transportation Projects
Effective Date: March 19, 2017
(NWP Final Notice, 82 FR 4 )
14. Linear Transportation Projects. Activities required for crossings of waters of the United
States associated with the construction, expansion, modification, or improvement of linear
transportation projects (e.g., roads, highways, railways, trails, airport runways, and taxiways) in
waters of the United States. For linear transportation projects in non-tidal waters, the discharge
cannot cause the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the United States. For linear
transportation projects in tidal waters, the discharge cannot cause the loss of greater than 1/3-acre
of waters of the United States. Any stream channel modification, including bank stabilization, is
limited to the minimum necessary to construct or protect the linear transportation project; such
modifications must be in the immediate vicinity of the project.
This NWP also authorizes temporary structures, fills, and work, including the use of
temporary mats, necessary to construct the linear transportation project. Appropriate measures must
be taken to maintain normal downstream flows and minimize flooding to the maximum extent
practicable, when temporary structures, work, and discharges, including cofferdams, are necessary
for construction activities, access fills, or dewatering of construction sites. Temporary fills must
consist of materials, and be placed in a manner, that will not be eroded by expected high flows.
Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre-
construction elevations. The areas affected by temporary fills must be revegetated, as appropriate.
This NWP cannot be used to authorize non-linear features commonly associated with
transportation projects, such as vehicle maintenance or storage buildings, parking lots, train
stations, or aircraft hangars.
Notification: The permittee must submit a pre-construction notification to the district
engineer prior to commencing the activity if: (1) the loss of waters of the United States exceeds
1/10-acre; or (2) there is a discharge in a special aquatic site, including wetlands. (See general
condition 32.) (Authorities: Sections 10 and 404)
Note 1: For linear transportation projects crossing a single waterbody more than one time
at separate and distant locations, or multiple waterbodies at separate and distant locations, each
crossing is considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP authorization. Linear
transportation projects must comply with 33 CFR 330.6(d).
Note 2: Some discharges for the construction of farm roads or forest roads, or temporary
roads for moving mining equipment, may qualify for an exemption under section 404(f) of the
Clean Water Act (see 33 CFR 323.4).
Note 3: For NWP 14 activities that require pre-construction notification, the PCN must
include any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used or intended to
be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity, including other
separate and distant crossings that require Department of the Army authorization but do not require
pre-construction notification (see paragraph (b) of general condition 32). The district engineer will
evaluate the PCN in accordance with Section D, “District Engineer’s Decision.” The district
engineer may require mitigation to ensure that the authorized activity results in no more than
minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects (see general condition 23).
Nationwide Permit General Conditions
Note: To qualify for NWP authorization, the prospective permittee must comply with the
following general conditions, as applicable, in addition to any regional or case-specific conditions
imposed by the division engineer or district engineer. Prospective permittees should contact the
appropriate Corps district office to determine if regional conditions have been imposed on an
NWP. Prospective permittees should also contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine
the status of Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification and/or Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency for an NWP. Every person who may wish to obtain permit
authorization under one or more NWPs, or who is currently relying on an existing or prior permit
authorization under one or more NWPs, has been and is on notice that all of the provisions of 33
CFR 330.1 through 330.6 apply to every NWP authorization. Note especially 33 CFR 330.5
relating to the modification, suspension, or revocation of any NWP authorization.
1. Navigation. (a) No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation.
(b) Any safety lights and signals prescribed by the U.S. Coast Guard, through regulations or
otherwise, must be installed and maintained at the permittee's expense on authorized facilities in
navigable waters of the United States.
(c) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States
require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if,
in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work
shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee
will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the
structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim
shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration.
2. Aquatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life cycle
movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species
that normally migrate through the area, unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water.
All permanent and temporary crossings of waterbodies shall be suitably culverted, bridged, or
otherwise designed and constructed to maintain low flows to sustain the movement of those aquatic
species. If a bottomless culvert cannot be used, then the crossing should be designed and
constructed to minimize adverse effects to aquatic life movements.
3. Spawning Areas. Activities in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided
to the maximum extent practicable. Activities that result in the physical destruction (e.g., through
excavation, fill, or downstream smothering by substantial turbidity) of an important spawning area
are not authorized.
4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas. Activities in waters of the United States that serve as
breeding areas for migratory birds must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable.
5. Shellfish Beds. No activity may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations,
unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWPs 4 and
48, or is a shellfish seeding or habitat restoration activity authorized by NWP 27.
6. Suitable Material. No activity may use unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies,
asphalt, etc.). Material used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in
toxic amounts (see section 307 of the Clean Water Act).
7. Water Supply Intakes. No activity may occur in the proximity of a public water supply
intake, except where the activity is for the repair or improvement of public water supply intake
structures or adjacent bank stabilization.
8. Adverse Effects From Impoundments. If the activity creates an impoundment of water,
adverse effects to the aquatic system due to accelerating the passage of water, and/or restricting its
flow must be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
9. Management of Water Flows. To the maximum extent practicable, the pre-construction
course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters must be maintained for each activity,
including stream channelization, storm water management activities, and temporary and permanent
road crossings, except as provided below. The activity must be constructed to withstand expected
high flows. The activity must not restrict or impede the passage of normal or high flows, unless the
primary purpose of the activity is to impound water or manage high flows. The activity may alter
the pre-construction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters if it benefits the
aquatic environment (e.g., stream restoration or relocation activities).
10. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. The activity must comply with applicable FEMA-
approved state or local floodplain management requirements.
11. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands or mudflats must be placed on mats,
or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance.
12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls
must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed
soil and other fills, as well as any work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line, must
be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. Permittees are encouraged to perform
work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or no-flow, or during low tides.
13. Removal of Temporary Fills. Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the
affected areas returned to pre-construction elevations. The affected areas must be revegetated, as
appropriate.
14. Proper Maintenance. Any authorized structure or fill shall be properly maintained,
including maintenance to ensure public safety and compliance with applicable NWP general
conditions, as well as any activity-specific conditions added by the district engineer to an NWP
authorization.
15. Single and Complete Project. The activity must be a single and complete project. The
same NWP cannot be used more than once for the same single and complete project.
16. Wild and Scenic Rivers. (a) No NWP activity may occur in a component of the
National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study
river” for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, unless the
appropriate Federal agency with direct management responsibility for such river, has determined in
writing that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation
or study status.
(b) If a proposed NWP activity will occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic
River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study river” for possible
inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, the permittee must submit a
pre-construction notification (see general condition 32). The district engineer will coordinate the
PCN with the Federal agency with direct management responsibility for that river. The permittee
shall not begin the NWP activity until notified by the district engineer that the Federal agency with
direct management responsibility for that river has determined in writing that the proposed NWP
activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or study status.
(c) Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal
land management agency responsible for the designated Wild and Scenic River or study river (e.g.,
National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service). Information on these rivers is also available at: http://www.rivers.gov/.
17. Tribal Rights. No NWP activity may cause more than minimal adverse effects on tribal
rights (including treaty rights), protected tribal resources, or tribal lands.
18. Endangered Species. (a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to
directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a
species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act
(ESA), or which will directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such
species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which “may affect” a listed species or critical
habitat, unless ESA section 7 consultation addressing the effects of the proposed activity has been
completed. Direct effects are the immediate effects on listed species and critical habitat caused by
the NWP activity. Indirect effects are those effects on listed species and critical habitat that are
caused by the NWP activity and are later in time, but still are reasonably certain to occur.
(b) Federal agencies should follow their own procedures for complying with the
requirements of the ESA. If pre-construction notification is required for the proposed activity, the
Federal permittee must provide the district engineer with the appropriate documentation to
demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will verify that the
appropriate documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate documentation has not been
submitted, additional ESA section 7 consultation may be necessary for the activity and the
respective federal agency would be responsible for fulfilling its obligation under section 7 of the
ESA.
(c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre-construction notification to the district
engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of
the activity, or if the activity is located in designated critical habitat, and shall not begin work on
the activity until notified by the district engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been
satisfied and that the activity is authorized. For activities that might affect Federally-listed
endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat, the pre-construction notification
must include the name(s) of the endangered or threatened species that might be affected by the
proposed activity or that utilize the designated critical habitat that might be affected by the
proposed activity. The district engineer will determine whether the proposed activity “may affect”
or will have “no effect” to listed species and designated critical habitat and will notify the non-
Federal applicant of the Corps’ determination within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-
construction notification. In cases where the non-Federal applicant has identified listed species or
critical habitat that might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, and has so notified the
Corps, the applicant shall not begin work until the Corps has provided notification that the
proposed activity will have “no effect” on listed species or critical habitat, or until ESA section 7
consultation has been completed. If the non-Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps
within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps.
(d) As a result of formal or informal consultation with the FWS or NMFS the district
engineer may add species-specific permit conditions to the NWPs.
(e) Authorization of an activity by an NWP does not authorize the “take” of a threatened or
endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization (e.g., an
ESA Section 10 Permit, a Biological Opinion with “incidental take” provisions, etc.) from the FWS
or the NMFS, the Endangered Species Act prohibits any person subject to the jurisdiction of the
United States to take a listed species, where "take" means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The word “harm”
in the definition of “take'' means an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may
include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering.
(f) If the non-federal permittee has a valid ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit
with an approved Habitat Conservation Plan for a project or a group of projects that includes the
proposed NWP activity, the non-federal applicant should provide a copy of that ESA section
10(a)(1)(B) permit with the PCN required by paragraph (c) of this general condition. The district
engineer will coordinate with the agency that issued the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit to
determine whether the proposed NWP activity and the associated incidental take were considered
in the internal ESA section 7 consultation conducted for the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit. If
that coordination results in concurrence from the agency that the proposed NWP activity and the
associated incidental take were considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation for the ESA
section 10(a)(1)(B) permit, the district engineer does not need to conduct a separate ESA section 7
consultation for the proposed NWP activity. The district engineer will notify the non-federal
applicant within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether the ESA
section 10(a)(1)(B) permit covers the proposed NWP activity or whether additional ESA section 7
consultation is required.
(g) Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical
habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the FWS and NMFS or their world wide web
pages at http://www.fws.gov/ or http://www.fws.gov/ipac and
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/ respectively.
19. Migratory Birds and Bald and Golden Eagles. The permittee is responsible for ensuring
their action complies with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act. The permittee is responsible for contacting appropriate local office of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to determine applicable measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds or eagles,
including whether “incidental take” permits are necessary and available under the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act or Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act for a particular activity.
20. Historic Properties. (a) In cases where the district engineer determines that the activity
may have the potential to cause effects to properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National
Register of Historic Places, the activity is not authorized, until the requirements of Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) have been satisfied.
(b) Federal permittees should follow their own procedures for complying with the
requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. If pre-construction
notification is required for the proposed NWP activity, the Federal permittee must provide the
district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with those
requirements. The district engineer will verify that the appropriate documentation has been
submitted. If the appropriate documentation is not submitted, then additional consultation under
section 106 may be necessary. The respective federal agency is responsible for fulfilling its
obligation to comply with section 106.
(c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre-construction notification to the district
engineer if the NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects to any historic properties
listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places, including previously unidentified properties. For such activities, the
pre-construction notification must state which historic properties might have the potential to be
affected by the proposed NWP activity or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the
historic properties or the potential for the presence of historic properties. Assistance regarding
information on the location of, or potential for, the presence of historic properties can be sought
from the State Historic Preservation Officer, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, or designated
tribal representative, as appropriate, and the National Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR
330.4(g)). When reviewing pre-construction notifications, district engineers will comply with the
current procedures for addressing the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. The district engineer shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to carry out
appropriate identification efforts, which may include background research, consultation, oral
history interviews, sample field investigation, and field survey. Based on the information
submitted in the PCN and these identification efforts, the district engineer shall determine whether
the proposed NWP activity has the potential to cause effects on the historic properties. Section 106
consultation is not required when the district engineer determines that the activity does not have the
potential to cause effects on historic properties (see 36 CFR 800.3(a)). Section 106 consultation is
required when the district engineer determines that the activity has the potential to cause effects on
historic properties. The district engineer will conduct consultation with consulting parties
identified under 36 CFR 800.2(c) when he or she makes any of the following effect determinations
for the purposes of section 106 of the NHPA: no historic properties affected, no adverse effect, or
adverse effect. Where the non-Federal applicant has identified historic properties on which the
activity might have the potential to cause effects and so notified the Corps, the non-Federal
applicant shall not begin the activity until notified by the district engineer either that the activity
has no potential to cause effects to historic properties or that NHPA section 106 consultation has
been completed.
(d) For non-federal permittees, the district engineer will notify the prospective permittee
within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether NHPA section 106
consultation is required. If NHPA section 106 consultation is required, the district engineer will
notify the non-Federal applicant that he or she cannot begin the activity until section 106
consultation is completed. If the non-Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within
45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps.
(e) Prospective permittees should be aware that section 110k of the NHPA (54 U.S.C.
306113) prevents the Corps from granting a permit or other assistance to an applicant who, with
intent to avoid the requirements of section 106 of the NHPA, has intentionally significantly
adversely affected a historic property to which the permit would relate, or having legal power to
prevent it, allowed such significant adverse effect to occur, unless the Corps, after consultation
with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), determines that circumstances justify
granting such assistance despite the adverse effect created or permitted by the applicant. If
circumstances justify granting the assistance, the Corps is required to notify the ACHP and provide
documentation specifying the circumstances, the degree of damage to the integrity of any historic
properties affected, and proposed mitigation. This documentation must include any views obtained
from the applicant, SHPO/THPO, appropriate Indian tribes if the undertaking occurs on or affects
historic properties on tribal lands or affects properties of interest to those tribes, and other parties
known to have a legitimate interest in the impacts to the permitted activity on historic properties.
21. Discovery of Previously Unknown Remains and Artifacts. If you discover any
previously unknown historic, cultural or archeological remains and artifacts while accomplishing
the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify the district engineer of what
you have found, and to the maximum extent practicable, avoid construction activities that may
affect the remains and artifacts until the required coordination has been completed. The district
engineer will initiate the Federal, Tribal, and state coordination required to determine if the items
or remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places.
22. Designated Critical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include, NOAA-managed
marine sanctuaries and marine monuments, and National Estuarine Research Reserves. The district
engineer may designate, after notice and opportunity for public comment, additional waters
officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance, such
as outstanding national resource waters or state natural heritage sites. The district engineer may
also designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for public comment.
(a) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States are not authorized
by NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, and 52 for any activity
within, or directly affecting, critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters.
(b) For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 54,
notification is required in accordance with general condition 32, for any activity proposed in the
designated critical resource waters including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The district
engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only after it is determined that the impacts to
the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal.
23. Mitigation. The district engineer will consider the following factors when determining
appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative
adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal:
(a) The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects,
both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at
the project site (i.e., on site).
(b) Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing, or compensating
for resource losses) will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the individual and
cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal.
(c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio will be required for all
wetland losses that exceed 1/10-acre and require pre-construction notification, unless the district
engineer determines in writing that either some other form of mitigation would be more
environmentally appropriate or the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no
more than minimal, and provides an activity-specific waiver of this requirement. For wetland losses
of 1/10-acre or less that require pre-construction notification, the district engineer may determine
on a case-by-case basis that compensatory mitigation is required to ensure that the activity results
in only minimal adverse environmental effects.
(d) For losses of streams or other open waters that require pre-construction notification, the
district engineer may require compensatory mitigation to ensure that the activity results in no more
than minimal adverse environmental effects. Compensatory mitigation for losses of streams should
be provided, if practicable, through stream rehabilitation, enhancement, or preservation, since
streams are difficult-to-replace resources (see 33 CFR 332.3(e)(3)).
(e) Compensatory mitigation plans for NWP activities in or near streams or other open
waters will normally include a requirement for the restoration or enhancement, maintenance, and
legal protection (e.g., conservation easements) of riparian areas next to open waters. In some cases,
the restoration or maintenance/protection of riparian areas may be the only compensatory
mitigation required. Restored riparian areas should consist of native species. The width of the
required riparian area will address documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns.
Normally, the riparian area will be 25 to 50 feet wide on each side of the stream, but the district
engineer may require slightly wider riparian areas to address documented water quality or habitat
loss concerns. If it is not possible to restore or maintain/protect a riparian area on both sides of a
stream, or if the waterbody is a lake or coastal waters, then restoring or maintaining/protecting a
riparian area along a single bank or shoreline may be sufficient. Where both wetlands and open
waters exist on the project site, the district engineer will determine the appropriate compensatory
mitigation (e.g., riparian areas and/or wetlands compensation) based on what is best for the aquatic
environment on a watershed basis. In cases where riparian areas are determined to be the most
appropriate form of minimization or compensatory mitigation, the district engineer may waive or
reduce the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland losses.
(f) Compensatory mitigation projects provided to offset losses of aquatic resources must
comply with the applicable provisions of 33 CFR part 332.
(1) The prospective permittee is responsible for proposing an appropriate compensatory
mitigation option if compensatory mitigation is necessary to ensure that the activity results in no
more than minimal adverse environmental effects. For the NWPs, the preferred mechanism for
providing compensatory mitigation is mitigation bank credits or in-lieu fee program credits (see 33
CFR 332.3(b)(2) and (3)). However, if an appropriate number and type of mitigation bank or in-
lieu credits are not available at the time the PCN is submitted to the district engineer, the district
engineer may approve the use of permittee-responsible mitigation.
(2) The amount of compensatory mitigation required by the district engineer must be
sufficient to ensure that the authorized activity results in no more than minimal individual and
cumulative adverse environmental effects (see 33 CFR 330.1(e)(3)). (See also 33 CFR 332.3(f)).
(3) Since the likelihood of success is greater and the impacts to potentially valuable uplands
are reduced, aquatic resource restoration should be the first compensatory mitigation option
considered for permittee-responsible mitigation.
(4) If permittee-responsible mitigation is the proposed option, the prospective permittee is
responsible for submitting a mitigation plan. A conceptual or detailed mitigation plan may be used
by the district engineer to make the decision on the NWP verification request, but a final mitigation
plan that addresses the applicable requirements of 33 CFR 332.4(c)(2) through (14) must be
approved by the district engineer before the permittee begins work in waters of the United States,
unless the district engineer determines that prior approval of the final mitigation plan is not
practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation
(see 33 CFR 332.3(k)(3)).
(5) If mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program credits are the proposed option, the mitigation
plan only needs to address the baseline conditions at the impact site and the number of credits to be
provided.
(6) Compensatory mitigation requirements (e.g., resource type and amount to be provided
as compensatory mitigation, site protection, ecological performance standards, monitoring
requirements) may be addressed through conditions added to the NWP authorization, instead of
components of a compensatory mitigation plan (see 33 CFR 332.4(c)(1)(ii)).
(g) Compensatory mitigation will not be used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the
acreage limits of the NWPs. For example, if an NWP has an acreage limit of 1/2-acre, it cannot be
used to authorize any NWP activity resulting in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the
United States, even if compensatory mitigation is provided that replaces or restores some of the lost
waters. However, compensatory mitigation can and should be used, as necessary, to ensure that an
NWP activity already meeting the established acreage limits also satisfies the no more than
minimal impact requirement for the NWPs.
(h) Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks, in-lieu fee programs, or permittee-
responsible mitigation. When developing a compensatory mitigation proposal, the permittee must
consider appropriate and practicable options consistent with the framework at 33 CFR 332.3(b).
For activities resulting in the loss of marine or estuarine resources, permittee-responsible mitigation
may be environmentally preferable if there are no mitigation banks or in-lieu fee programs in the
area that have marine or estuarine credits available for sale or transfer to the permittee. For
permittee-responsible mitigation, the special conditions of the NWP verification must clearly
indicate the party or parties responsible for the implementation and performance of the
compensatory mitigation project, and, if required, its long-term management.
(i) Where certain functions and services of waters of the United States are permanently
adversely affected by a regulated activity, such as discharges of dredged or fill material into waters
of the United States that will convert a forested or scrub-shrub wetland to a herbaceous wetland in
a permanently maintained utility line right-of-way, mitigation may be required to reduce the
adverse environmental effects of the activity to the no more than minimal level.
24. Safety of Impoundment Structures. To ensure that all impoundment structures are
safely designed, the district engineer may require non-Federal applicants to demonstrate that the
structures comply with established state dam safety criteria or have been designed by qualified
persons. The district engineer may also require documentation that the design has been
independently reviewed by similarly qualified persons, and appropriate modifications made to
ensure safety.
25. Water Quality. Where States and authorized Tribes, or EPA where applicable, have not
previously certified compliance of an NWP with CWA section 401, individual 401 Water Quality
Certification must be obtained or waived (see 33 CFR 330.4(c)). The district engineer or State or
Tribe may require additional water quality management measures to ensure that the authorized
activity does not result in more than minimal degradation of water quality.
26. Coastal Zone Management. In coastal states where an NWP has not previously received
a state coastal zone management consistency concurrence, an individual state coastal zone
management consistency concurrence must be obtained, or a presumption of concurrence must
occur (see 33 CFR 330.4(d)). The district engineer or a State may require additional measures to
ensure that the authorized activity is consistent with state coastal zone management requirements.
27. Regional and Case-By-Case Conditions. The activity must comply with any regional
conditions that may have been added by the Division Engineer (see 33 CFR 330.4(e)) and with any
case specific conditions added by the Corps or by the state, Indian Tribe, or U.S. EPA in its section
401 Water Quality Certification, or by the state in its Coastal Zone Management Act consistency
determination.
28. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and
complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the United States
authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specified
acreage limit. For example, if a road crossing over tidal waters is constructed under NWP 14, with
associated bank stabilization authorized by NWP 13, the maximum acreage loss of waters of the
United States for the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre.
29. Transfer of Nationwide Permit Verifications. If the permittee sells the property
associated with a nationwide permit verification, the permittee may transfer the nationwide permit
verification to the new owner by submitting a letter to the appropriate Corps district office to
validate the transfer. A copy of the nationwide permit verification must be attached to the letter,
and the letter must contain the following statement and signature:
“When the structures or work authorized by this nationwide permit are still in existence at
the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this nationwide permit, including
any special conditions, will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate
the transfer of this nationwide permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with
its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below.”
_____________________________________________
(Transferee)
_____________________________________________
(Date)
30. Compliance Certification. Each permittee who receives an NWP verification letter from
the Corps must provide a signed certification documenting completion of the authorized activity
and implementation of any required compensatory mitigation. The success of any required
permittee-responsible mitigation, including the achievement of ecological performance standards,
will be addressed separately by the district engineer. The Corps will provide the permittee the
certification document with the NWP verification letter. The certification document will include:
(a) A statement that the authorized activity was done in accordance with the NWP
authorization, including any general, regional, or activity-specific conditions;
(b) A statement that the implementation of any required compensatory mitigation was
completed in accordance with the permit conditions. If credits from a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee
program are used to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements, the certification must
include the documentation required by 33 CFR 332.3(l)(3) to confirm that the permittee secured the
appropriate number and resource type of credits; and
(c) The signature of the permittee certifying the completion of the activity and mitigation.
The completed certification document must be submitted to the district engineer within 30
days of completion of the authorized activity or the implementation of any required compensatory
mitigation, whichever occurs later.
31. Activities Affecting Structures or Works Built by the United States. If an NWP activity
also requires permission from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 because it will alter or
temporarily or permanently occupy or use a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) federally
authorized Civil Works project (a “USACE project”), the prospective permittee must submit a pre-
construction notification. See paragraph (b)(10) of general condition 32. An activity that requires
section 408 permission is not authorized by NWP until the appropriate Corps office issues the
section 408 permission to alter, occupy, or use the USACE project, and the district engineer issues
a written NWP verification.
32. Pre-Construction Notification. (a) Timing. Where required by the terms of the NWP, the
prospective permittee must notify the district engineer by submitting a pre-construction notification
(PCN) as early as possible. The district engineer must determine if the PCN is complete within 30
calendar days of the date of receipt and, if the PCN is determined to be incomplete, notify the
prospective permittee within that 30 day period to request the additional information necessary to
make the PCN complete. The request must specify the information needed to make the PCN
complete. As a general rule, district engineers will request additional information necessary to
make the PCN complete only once. However, if the prospective permittee does not provide all of
the requested information, then the district engineer will notify the prospective permittee that the
PCN is still incomplete and the PCN review process will not commence until all of the requested
information has been received by the district engineer. The prospective permittee shall not begin
the activity until either:
(1) He or she is notified in writing by the district engineer that the activity may proceed
under the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the district or division engineer; or
(2) 45 calendar days have passed from the district engineer’s receipt of the complete PCN
and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the district or division engineer.
However, if the permittee was required to notify the Corps pursuant to general condition 18 that
listed species or critical habitat might be affected or are in the vicinity of the activity, or to notify
the Corps pursuant to general condition 20 that the activity might have the potential to cause effects
to historic properties, the permittee cannot begin the activity until receiving written notification
from the Corps that there is “no effect” on listed species or “no potential to cause effects” on
historic properties, or that any consultation required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(see 33 CFR 330.4(f)) and/or section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (see 33 CFR
330.4(g)) has been completed. Also, work cannot begin under NWPs 21, 49, or 50 until the
permittee has received written approval from the Corps. If the proposed activity requires a written
waiver to exceed specified limits of an NWP, the permittee may not begin the activity until the
district engineer issues the waiver. If the district or division engineer notifies the permittee in
writing that an individual permit is required within 45 calendar days of receipt of a complete PCN,
the permittee cannot begin the activity until an individual permit has been obtained. Subsequently,
the permittee’s right to proceed under the NWP may be modified, suspended, or revoked only in
accordance with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(d)(2).
(b) Contents of Pre-Construction Notification: The PCN must be in writing and include the
following information:
(1) Name, address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee;
(2) Location of the proposed activity;
(3) Identify the specific NWP or NWP(s) the prospective permittee wants to use to
authorize the proposed activity;
(4) A description of the proposed activity; the activity’s purpose; direct and indirect adverse
environmental effects the activity would cause, including the anticipated amount of loss of
wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters expected to result from the NWP activity, in
acres, linear feet, or other appropriate unit of measure; a description of any proposed mitigation
measures intended to reduce the adverse environmental effects caused by the proposed activity; and
any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used or intended to be used to
authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity, including other separate and
distant crossings for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but do not
require pre-construction notification. The description of the proposed activity and any proposed
mitigation measures should be sufficiently detailed to allow the district engineer to determine that
the adverse environmental effects of the activity will be no more than minimal and to determine the
need for compensatory mitigation or other mitigation measures. For single and complete linear
projects, the PCN must include the quantity of anticipated losses of wetlands, other special aquatic
sites, and other waters for each single and complete crossing of those wetlands, other special
aquatic sites, and other waters. Sketches should be provided when necessary to show that the
activity complies with the terms of the NWP. (Sketches usually clarify the activity and when
provided results in a quicker decision. Sketches should contain sufficient detail to provide an
illustrative description of the proposed activity (e.g., a conceptual plan), but do not need to be
detailed engineering plans);
(5) The PCN must include a delineation of wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other
waters, such as lakes and ponds, and perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral streams, on the project
site. Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the
Corps. The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate the special aquatic sites and other waters on
the project site, but there may be a delay if the Corps does the delineation, especially if the project
site is large or contains many wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters. Furthermore,
the 45 day period will not start until the delineation has been submitted to or completed by the
Corps, as appropriate;
(6) If the proposed activity will result in the loss of greater than 1/10-acre of wetlands and a
PCN is required, the prospective permittee must submit a statement describing how the mitigation
requirement will be satisfied, or explaining why the adverse environmental effects are no more than
minimal and why compensatory mitigation should not be required. As an alternative, the
prospective permittee may submit a conceptual or detailed mitigation plan.
(7) For non-Federal permittees, if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be
affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, or if the activity is located in designated critical habitat,
the PCN must include the name(s) of those endangered or threatened species that might be affected
by the proposed activity or utilize the designated critical habitat that might be affected by the
proposed activity. For NWP activities that require pre-construction notification, Federal permittees
must provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the Endangered Species Act;
(8) For non-Federal permittees, if the NWP activity might have the potential to cause
effects to a historic property listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially
eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places, the PCN must state which historic
property might have the potential to be affected by the proposed activity or include a vicinity map
indicating the location of the historic property. For NWP activities that require pre-construction
notification, Federal permittees must provide documentation demonstrating compliance with
section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act;
(9) For an activity that will occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River
System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study river” for possible inclusion in
the system while the river is in an official study status, the PCN must identify the Wild and Scenic
River or the “study river” (see general condition 16); and
(10) For an activity that requires permission from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408
because it will alter or temporarily or permanently occupy or use a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
federally authorized civil works project, the pre-construction notification must include a statement
confirming that the project proponent has submitted a written request for section 408 permission
from the Corps office having jurisdiction over that USACE project.
(c) Form of Pre-Construction Notification: The standard individual permit application form
(Form ENG 4345) may be used, but the completed application form must clearly indicate that it is
an NWP PCN and must include all of the applicable information required in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (10) of this general condition. A letter containing the required information may also be
used. Applicants may provide electronic files of PCNs and supporting materials if the district
engineer has established tools and procedures for electronic submittals.
(d) Agency Coordination: (1) The district engineer will consider any comments from
Federal and state agencies concerning the proposed activity’s compliance with the terms and
conditions of the NWPs and the need for mitigation to reduce the activity’s adverse environmental
effects so that they are no more than minimal.
(2) Agency coordination is required for: (i) all NWP activities that require pre-construction
notification and result in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the United States; (ii) NWP
21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, and 52 activities that require pre-construction notification and
will result in the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of stream bed; (iii) NWP 13 activities in excess
of 500 linear feet, fills greater than one cubic yard per running foot, or involve discharges of
dredged or fill material into special aquatic sites; and (iv) NWP 54 activities in excess of 500 linear
feet, or that extend into the waterbody more than 30 feet from the mean low water line in tidal
waters or the ordinary high water mark in the Great Lakes.
(3) When agency coordination is required, the district engineer will immediately provide
(e.g., via e-mail, facsimile transmission, overnight mail, or other expeditious manner) a copy of the
complete PCN to the appropriate Federal or state offices (FWS, state natural resource or water
quality agency, EPA, and, if appropriate, the NMFS). With the exception of NWP 37, these
agencies will have 10 calendar days from the date the material is transmitted to notify the district
engineer via telephone, facsimile transmission, or e-mail that they intend to provide substantive,
site-specific comments. The comments must explain why the agency believes the adverse
environmental effects will be more than minimal. If so contacted by an agency, the district engineer
will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on the pre-construction
notification. The district engineer will fully consider agency comments received within the
specified time frame concerning the proposed activity’s compliance with the terms and conditions
of the NWPs, including the need for mitigation to ensure the net adverse environmental effects of
the proposed activity are no more than minimal. The district engineer will provide no response to
the resource agency, except as provided below. The district engineer will indicate in the
administrative record associated with each pre-construction notification that the resource agencies’
concerns were considered. For NWP 37, the emergency watershed protection and rehabilitation
activity may proceed immediately in cases where there is an unacceptable hazard to life or a
significant loss of property or economic hardship will occur. The district engineer will consider any
comments received to decide whether the NWP 37 authorization should be modified, suspended, or
revoked in accordance with the procedures at 33 CFR 330.5.
(4) In cases of where the prospective permittee is not a Federal agency, the district engineer
will provide a response to NMFS within 30 calendar days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat
conservation recommendations, as required by section 305(b)(4)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
(5) Applicants are encouraged to provide the Corps with either electronic files or multiple
copies of pre-construction notifications to expedite agency coordination.
D. District Engineer’s Decision
1. In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity, the district engineer will determine
whether the activity authorized by the NWP will result in more than minimal individual or
cumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the public interest. If a project
proponent requests authorization by a specific NWP, the district engineer should issue the NWP
verification for that activity if it meets the terms and conditions of that NWP, unless he or she
determines, after considering mitigation, that the proposed activity will result in more than minimal
individual and cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic environment and other aspects of the
public interest and exercises discretionary authority to require an individual permit for the proposed
activity. For a linear project, this determination will include an evaluation of the individual
crossings of waters of the United States to determine whether they individually satisfy the terms
and conditions of the NWP(s), as well as the cumulative effects caused by all of the crossings
authorized by NWP. If an applicant requests a waiver of the 300 linear foot limit on impacts to
streams or of an otherwise applicable limit, as provided for in NWPs 13, 21, 29, 36, 39, 40, 42, 43,
44, 50, 51, 52, or 54, the district engineer will only grant the waiver upon a written determination
that the NWP activity will result in only minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental
effects. For those NWPs that have a waivable 300 linear foot limit for losses of intermittent and
ephemeral stream bed and a 1/2-acre limit (i.e., NWPs 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, and 52),
the loss of intermittent and ephemeral stream bed, plus any other losses of jurisdictional waters and
wetlands, cannot exceed 1/2-acre.
2. When making minimal adverse environmental effects determinations the district
engineer will consider the direct and indirect effects caused by the NWP activity. He or she will
also consider the cumulative adverse environmental effects caused by activities authorized by
NWP and whether those cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal. The
district engineer will also consider site specific factors, such as the environmental setting in the
vicinity of the NWP activity, the type of resource that will be affected by the NWP activity, the
functions provided by the aquatic resources that will be affected by the NWP activity, the degree or
magnitude to which the aquatic resources perform those functions, the extent that aquatic resource
functions will be lost as a result of the NWP activity (e.g., partial or complete loss), the duration of
the adverse effects (temporary or permanent), the importance of the aquatic resource functions to
the region (e.g., watershed or ecoregion), and mitigation required by the district engineer. If an
appropriate functional or condition assessment method is available and practicable to use, that
assessment method may be used by the district engineer to assist in the minimal adverse
environmental effects determination. The district engineer may add case-specific special conditions
to the NWP authorization to address site-specific environmental concerns.
3. If the proposed activity requires a PCN and will result in a loss of greater than 1/10-acre
of wetlands, the prospective permittee should submit a mitigation proposal with the PCN.
Applicants may also propose compensatory mitigation for NWP activities with smaller impacts, or
for impacts to other types of waters (e.g., streams). The district engineer will consider any proposed
compensatory mitigation or other mitigation measures the applicant has included in the proposal in
determining whether the net adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more
than minimal. The compensatory mitigation proposal may be either conceptual or detailed. If the
district engineer determines that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP
and that the adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal, after considering mitigation,
the district engineer will notify the permittee and include any activity-specific conditions in the
NWP verification the district engineer deems necessary. Conditions for compensatory mitigation
requirements must comply with the appropriate provisions at 33 CFR 332.3(k). The district
engineer must approve the final mitigation plan before the permittee commences work in waters of
the United States, unless the district engineer determines that prior approval of the final mitigation
plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory
mitigation. If the prospective permittee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the
PCN, the district engineer will expeditiously review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan.
The district engineer must review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan within 45 calendar
days of receiving a complete PCN and determine whether the proposed mitigation would ensure
the NWP activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. If the net adverse
environmental effects of the NWP activity (after consideration of the mitigation proposal) are
determined by the district engineer to be no more than minimal, the district engineer will provide a
timely written response to the applicant. The response will state that the NWP activity can proceed
under the terms and conditions of the NWP, including any activity-specific conditions added to the
NWP authorization by the district engineer.
4. If the district engineer determines that the adverse environmental effects of the proposed
activity are more than minimal, then the district engineer will notify the applicant either: (a) that
the activity does not qualify for authorization under the NWP and instruct the applicant on the
procedures to seek authorization under an individual permit; (b) that the activity is authorized
under the NWP subject to the applicant’s submission of a mitigation plan that would reduce the
adverse environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal; or (c) that the activity is
authorized under the NWP with specific modifications or conditions. Where the district engineer
determines that mitigation is required to ensure no more than minimal adverse environmental
effects, the activity will be authorized within the 45-day PCN period (unless additional time is
required to comply with general conditions 18, 20, and/or 31, or to evaluate PCNs for activities
authorized by NWPs 21, 49, and 50), with activity-specific conditions that state the mitigation
requirements. The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or detailed mitigation plan or
a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation plan that would reduce the adverse
environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal. When compensatory mitigation is
required, no work in waters of the United States may occur until the district engineer has approved
a specific mitigation plan or has determined that prior approval of a final mitigation plan is not
practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation.
E. Further Information
1. District Engineers have authority to determine if an activity complies with the terms and
conditions of an NWP.
2. NWPs do not obviate the need to obtain other federal, state, or local permits, approvals,
or authorizations required by law.
3. NWPs do not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges.
4. NWPs do not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others.
5. NWPs do not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project (see
general condition 31).
F. Definitions
Best management practices (BMPs): Policies, practices, procedures, or structures
implemented to mitigate the adverse environmental effects on surface water quality resulting from
development. BMPs are categorized as structural or non-structural.
Compensatory mitigation: The restoration (re-establishment or rehabilitation),
establishment (creation), enhancement, and/or in certain circumstances preservation of aquatic
resources for the purposes of offsetting unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all
appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization has been achieved.
Currently serviceable: Useable as is or with some maintenance, but not so degraded as to
essentially require reconstruction.
Direct effects: Effects that are caused by the activity and occur at the same time and place.
Discharge: The term “discharge” means any discharge of dredged or fill material into
waters of the United States.
Ecological reference: A model used to plan and design an aquatic habitat and riparian area
restoration, enhancement, or establishment activity under NWP 27. An ecological reference may
be based on the structure, functions, and dynamics of an aquatic habitat type or a riparian area type
that currently exists in the region where the proposed NWP 27 activity is located. Alternatively, an
ecological reference may be based on a conceptual model for the aquatic habitat type or riparian
area type to be restored, enhanced, or established as a result of the proposed NWP 27 activity. An
ecological reference takes into account the range of variation of the aquatic habitat type or riparian
area type in the region.
Enhancement: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of
an aquatic resource to heighten, intensify, or improve a specific aquatic resource function(s).
Enhancement results in the gain of selected aquatic resource function(s), but may also lead to a
decline in other aquatic resource function(s). Enhancement does not result in a gain in aquatic
resource area.
Ephemeral stream: An ephemeral stream has flowing water only during, and for a short
duration after, precipitation events in a typical year. Ephemeral stream beds are located above the
water table year-round. Groundwater is not a source of water for the stream. Runoff from rainfall is
the primary source of water for stream flow.
Establishment (creation): The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological
characteristics present to develop an aquatic resource that did not previously exist at an upland site.
Establishment results in a gain in aquatic resource area.
High Tide Line: The line of intersection of the land with the water’s surface at the
maximum height reached by a rising tide. The high tide line may be determined, in the absence of
actual data, by a line of oil or scum along shore objects, a more or less continuous deposit of fine
shell or debris on the foreshore or berm, other physical markings or characteristics, vegetation
lines, tidal gages, or other suitable means that delineate the general height reached by a rising tide.
The line encompasses spring high tides and other high tides that occur with periodic frequency but
does not include storm surges in which there is a departure from the normal or predicted reach of
the tide due to the piling up of water against a coast by strong winds such as those accompanying a
hurricane or other intense storm.
Historic Property: Any prehistoric or historic district, site (including archaeological site),
building, structure, or other object included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of
Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of the Interior. This term includes artifacts, records,
and remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of
traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and
that meet the National Register criteria (36 CFR part 60).
Independent utility: A test to determine what constitutes a single and complete non-linear
project in the Corps Regulatory Program. A project is considered to have independent utility if it
would be constructed absent the construction of other projects in the project area. Portions of a
multi-phase project that depend upon other phases of the project do not have independent utility.
Phases of a project that would be constructed even if the other phases were not built can be
considered as separate single and complete projects with independent utility.
Indirect effects: Effects that are caused by the activity and are later in time or farther
removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable.
Intermittent stream: An intermittent stream has flowing water during certain times of the
year, when groundwater provides water for stream flow. During dry periods, intermittent streams
may not have flowing water. Runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream
flow.
Loss of waters of the United States: Waters of the United States that are permanently
adversely affected by filling, flooding, excavation, or drainage because of the regulated activity.
Permanent adverse effects include permanent discharges of dredged or fill material that change an
aquatic area to dry land, increase the bottom elevation of a waterbody, or change the use of a
waterbody. The acreage of loss of waters of the United States is a threshold measurement of the
impact to jurisdictional waters for determining whether a project may qualify for an NWP; it is not
a net threshold that is calculated after considering compensatory mitigation that may be used to
offset losses of aquatic functions and services. The loss of stream bed includes the acres or linear
feet of stream bed that are filled or excavated as a result of the regulated activity. Waters of the
United States temporarily filled, flooded, excavated, or drained, but restored to pre-construction
contours and elevations after construction, are not included in the measurement of loss of waters of
the United States. Impacts resulting from activities that do not require Department of the Army
authorization, such as activities eligible for exemptions under section 404(f) of the Clean Water
Act, are not considered when calculating the loss of waters of the United States.
Navigable waters: Waters subject to section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
These waters are defined at 33 CFR part 329.
Non-tidal wetland: A non-tidal wetland is a wetland that is not subject to the ebb and flow
of tidal waters. Non-tidal wetlands contiguous to tidal waters are located landward of the high tide
line (i.e., spring high tide line).
Open water: For purposes of the NWPs, an open water is any area that in a year with
normal patterns of precipitation has water flowing or standing above ground to the extent that an
ordinary high water mark can be determined. Aquatic vegetation within the area of flowing or
standing water is either non-emergent, sparse, or absent. Vegetated shallows are considered to be
open waters. Examples of “open waters” include rivers, streams, lakes, and ponds.
Ordinary High Water Mark: An ordinary high water mark is a line on the shore established
by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics, or by other appropriate means
that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas.
Perennial stream: A perennial stream has flowing water year-round during a typical year.
The water table is located above the stream bed for most of the year. Groundwater is the primary
source of water for stream flow. Runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream
flow.
Practicable: Available and capable of being done after taking into consideration cost,
existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes.
Pre-construction notification: A request submitted by the project proponent to the Corps for
confirmation that a particular activity is authorized by nationwide permit. The request may be a
permit application, letter, or similar document that includes information about the proposed work
and its anticipated environmental effects. Pre-construction notification may be required by the
terms and conditions of a nationwide permit, or by regional conditions. A pre-construction
notification may be voluntarily submitted in cases where pre-construction notification is not
required and the project proponent wants confirmation that the activity is authorized by nationwide
permit.
Preservation: The removal of a threat to, or preventing the decline of, aquatic resources by
an action in or near those aquatic resources. This term includes activities commonly associated
with the protection and maintenance of aquatic resources through the implementation of
appropriate legal and physical mechanisms. Preservation does not result in a gain of aquatic
resource area or functions.
Protected tribal resources: Those natural resources and properties of traditional or
customary religious or cultural importance, either on or off Indian lands, retained by, or reserved
by or for, Indian tribes through treaties, statutes, judicial decisions, or executive orders, including
tribal trust resources.
Re-establishment: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics
of a site with the goal of returning natural/historic functions to a former aquatic resource. Re-
establishment results in rebuilding a former aquatic resource and results in a gain in aquatic
resource area and functions.
Rehabilitation: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a
site with the goal of repairing natural/historic functions to a degraded aquatic resource.
Rehabilitation results in a gain in aquatic resource function, but does not result in a gain in aquatic
resource area.
Restoration: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a
site with the goal of returning natural/historic functions to a former or degraded aquatic resource.
For the purpose of tracking net gains in aquatic resource area, restoration is divided into two
categories: re-establishment and rehabilitation.
Riffle and pool complex: Riffle and pool complexes are special aquatic sites under the
404(b)(1) Guidelines. Riffle and pool complexes sometimes characterize steep gradient sections of
streams. Such stream sections are recognizable by their hydraulic characteristics. The rapid
movement of water over a course substrate in riffles results in a rough flow, a turbulent surface,
and high dissolved oxygen levels in the water. Pools are deeper areas associated with riffles. A
slower stream velocity, a streaming flow, a smooth surface, and a finer substrate characterize pools.
Riparian areas: Riparian areas are lands next to streams, lakes, and estuarine-marine
shorelines. Riparian areas are transitional between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, through
which surface and subsurface hydrology connects riverine, lacustrine, estuarine, and marine waters
with their adjacent wetlands, non-wetland waters, or uplands. Riparian areas provide a variety of
ecological functions and services and help improve or maintain local water quality. (See general
condition 23.)
Shellfish seeding: The placement of shellfish seed and/or suitable substrate to increase
shellfish production. Shellfish seed consists of immature individual shellfish or individual shellfish
attached to shells or shell fragments (i.e., spat on shell). Suitable substrate may consist of shellfish
shells, shell fragments, or other appropriate materials placed into waters for shellfish habitat.
Single and complete linear project: A linear project is a project constructed for the purpose
of getting people, goods, or services from a point of origin to a terminal point, which often involves
multiple crossings of one or more waterbodies at separate and distant locations. The term “single
and complete project” is defined as that portion of the total linear project proposed or accomplished
by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers that includes all
crossings of a single water of the United States (i.e., a single waterbody) at a specific location. For
linear projects crossing a single or multiple waterbodies several times at separate and distant
locations, each crossing is considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP
authorization. However, individual channels in a braided stream or river, or individual arms of a
large, irregularly shaped wetland or lake, etc., are not separate waterbodies, and crossings of such
features cannot be considered separately.
Single and complete non-linear project: For non-linear projects, the term “single and
complete project” is defined at 33 CFR 330.2(i) as the total project proposed or accomplished by
one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers. A single and
complete non-linear project must have independent utility (see definition of “independent utility”).
Single and complete non-linear projects may not be “piecemealed” to avoid the limits in an NWP
authorization.
Stormwater management: Stormwater management is the mechanism for controlling
stormwater runoff for the purposes of reducing downstream erosion, water quality degradation, and
flooding and mitigating the adverse effects of changes in land use on the aquatic environment.
Stormwater management facilities: Stormwater management facilities are those facilities,
including but not limited to, stormwater retention and detention ponds and best management
practices, which retain water for a period of time to control runoff and/or improve the quality (i.e.,
by reducing the concentration of nutrients, sediments, hazardous substances and other pollutants)
of stormwater runoff.
Stream bed: The substrate of the stream channel between the ordinary high water marks.
The substrate may be bedrock or inorganic particles that range in size from clay to boulders.
Wetlands contiguous to the stream bed, but outside of the ordinary high water marks, are not
considered part of the stream bed.
Stream channelization: The manipulation of a stream’s course, condition, capacity, or
location that causes more than minimal interruption of normal stream processes. A channelized
stream remains a water of the United States.
Structure: An object that is arranged in a definite pattern of organization. Examples of
structures include, without limitation, any pier, boat dock, boat ramp, wharf, dolphin, weir, boom,
breakwater, bulkhead, revetment, riprap, jetty, artificial island, artificial reef, permanent mooring
structure, power transmission line, permanently moored floating vessel, piling, aid to navigation, or
any other manmade obstacle or obstruction.
Tidal wetland: A tidal wetland is a jurisdictional wetland that is inundated by tidal waters.
Tidal waters rise and fall in a predictable and measurable rhythm or cycle due to the gravitational
pulls of the moon and sun. Tidal waters end where the rise and fall of the water surface can no
longer be practically measured in a predictable rhythm due to masking by other waters, wind, or
other effects. Tidal wetlands are located channelward of the high tide line.
Tribal lands: Any lands title to which is either: 1) held in trust by the United States for the
benefit of any Indian tribe or individual; or 2) held by any Indian tribe or individual subject to
restrictions by the United States against alienation.
Tribal rights: Those rights legally accruing to a tribe or tribes by virtue of inherent
sovereign authority, unextinguished aboriginal title, treaty, statute, judicial decisions, executive
order or agreement, and that give rise to legally enforceable remedies.
Vegetated shallows: Vegetated shallows are special aquatic sites under the 404(b)(1)
Guidelines. They are areas that are permanently inundated and under normal circumstances have
rooted aquatic vegetation, such as seagrasses in marine and estuarine systems and a variety of
vascular rooted plants in freshwater systems.
Waterbody: For purposes of the NWPs, a waterbody is a jurisdictional water of the United
States. If a wetland is adjacent to a waterbody determined to be a water of the United States, that
waterbody and any adjacent wetlands are considered together as a single aquatic unit (see 33 CFR
328.4(c)(2)). Examples of “waterbodies” include streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and wetlands.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This nationwide permit is effective March 19, 2017, and expires on March 18, 2022.
Information about the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulatory program, including nationwide permits, may also be
found at http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx and
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
2017 Nationwide Permit Regional Conditions For The State Of Texas Page 1 of 6
2017 NATIONWIDE PERMIT (NWP) REGIONAL CONDITIONS
FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
The following regional conditions apply within the entire State of Texas:
1. For all discharges proposed for authorization under Nationwide Permits (NWP) 3, 6,
7, 12, 14, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 51, and 52, into the
following habitat types or specific areas, the applicant shall notify the appropriate District
Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition 32, Pre-Construction
Notification (PCN). The Corps of Engineers (Corps) will coordinate with the resource
agencies as specified in NWP General Condition 32(d) (PCN). The habitat types or
areas are:
a. Pitcher Plant Bogs: Wetlands typically characterized by an organic
surface soil layer and include vegetation such as pitcher plants (Sarracenia spp.)
and/or sundews (Drosera spp.).
b. Bald Cypress-Tupelo Swamps: Wetlands dominated by bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) and/or water tupelo (Nyssa aquatic).
2. For all activities proposed for authorization under any Nationwide Permit (NWP) at
sites approved as compensatory mitigation sites (either permittee-responsible,
mitigation bank and/or in-lieu fee) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, the applicant shall notify the
appropriate District Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition 32 - Pre-
Construction Notification prior to commencing the activity.
3. For all activities proposed for authorization under NWP 16, the applicant shall notify
the appropriate District Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition 32
(Pre-Construction Notification) and must obtain an individual water quality certification
(WQC) from the TCEQ. Work cannot begin under NWP 16 until the applicant has
received written approval from the Corps and WQC.
NOTE: For all activities proposing to use equipment that has operated or been stored in
a water body on the Texas list of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) infected water
bodies, equipment should be decontaminated prior to relocation in accordance with
Texas Administrative Code, Title 31, Part 2, Chapter 57, Subchapter A. The following
decontamination Best Management Practices (BMPs), as a minimum, are indicated:
a. Clean: Clean both the inside and outside of equipment and gear, by
removing all plants, animals, and mud and thoroughly washing the equipment
using a high pressure spray nozzle.
b. Drain: Drain all water from receptacles before leaving the area, including
livewells, bilges, ballast, and engine cooling water on boats.
c. Dry: Allow time for your equipment to dry completely before relocating in
other waters. Equipment should be dried prior to relocation. High temperature
pressure washing (greater than or equal to 140F) or professional cleaning may
be substituted for drying time.
2017 Nationwide Permit Regional Conditions For The State Of Texas Page 2 of 6
The following regional condition only applies within the Albuquerque, Fort Worth,
and Galveston Districts:
4. For all activities proposed for authorization under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12 that
involve a discharge of fill material associated with mechanized land clearing of wetlands
dominated by native woody shrubs, the applicant shall notify the appropriate District
Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition 32 – Pre-Construction
Notification prior to commencing the activity. For the purpose of this regional condition,
a shrub dominated wetland is characterized by woody vegetation less than 3.0 inches in
diameter at breast height but greater than 3.2 feet in height, which covers 20% or more
of the area. Woody vines are not included.
The following regional conditions apply within the Albuquerque District.
5. Nationwide Permit (NWP) 23 – Approved Categorical Exclusions. A pre-construction
notification (PCN) to the District Engineer in accordance with General Condition 32 -
PCN is required for all proposed activities under NWP 23.
6. Nationwide Permit (NWP) 27 – Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, and
Enhancement Activities. For all proposed activities under NWP 27 that require pre-
construction notification, a monitoring plan commensurate with the scale of the
proposed restoration project and the potential for risk to the aquatic environment must
be submitted to the Corps. (See “NWP 27 Guidelines” at
http://www.spa.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/NWP.aspx).
7. Channelization. Nationwide Permit (NWP) General Condition 9 for Management of
Water Flows is amended to add the following: Projects that would result in permanent
channelization to previously un-channelized streams require pre-construction
notification to the Albuquerque District Engineer in accordance with NWP General
Condition 32 – Pre-Construction Notification.
8. Dredge and Fill Activities in Intermittent and Perennial Streams, and Special Aquatic
Sites: For all activities subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act Section 404 in
intermittent and perennial streams, and special aquatic sites (including wetlands, riffle
and pool complexes, and sanctuaries and refuges), pre-construction notification (PCN)
to the Albuquerque District Engineer is required in accordance with Nationwide Permit
General Condition 32 - PCN.
9. Springs. For all discharges of dredged or fill material within 100 feet of the point of
groundwater discharge of natural springs located in an aquatic resource, a pre-
construction notification (PCN) is required to the Albuquerque District Engineer in
accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition 32 - PCN. A natural spring is
defined as any location where ground water emanates from a point in the ground and
has a defined surface water connection to another waters of the United States. For
purposes of this regional condition, springs do not include seeps or other groundwater
discharges which lack a defined surface water connection.
2017 Nationwide Permit Regional Conditions For The State Of Texas Page 3 of 6
10. Suitable Fill. Use of broken concrete as fill or bank stabilization material is
prohibited unless the applicant demonstrates that its use is the only practicable material
(with respect to cost, existing technology, and logistics). Any applicant who wishes to
use broken concrete as bank stabilization must provide notification to the Albuquerque
District Engineer in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition 32 - Pre-
Construction Notification along with justification for such use. Use of broken concrete
with rebar or used tires (loose or formed into bales) is prohibited in all waters of the
United States.
The following regional conditions apply only within the Fort Worth District.
11. For all discharges proposed for authorization under all Nationwide Permits (NWP)
into the area of Caddo Lake within Texas that is designated as a “Wetland of
International Importance” under the Ramsar Convention, the applicant shall notify the
Fort Worth District Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition 32 – Pre-
Construction Notification (PCN). The Fort Worth District will coordinate with the
resource agencies as specified in NWP General Condition 32(d) - PCN.
12. Compensatory mitigation is generally required for losses of waters of the United
States that exceed 1/10 acre and/or for all losses to streams that exceed 300 linear feet.
Loss is defined in Section F of the Nationwide Permits (NWP). Mitigation thresholds are
cumulative irrespective of aquatic resource type at each single and complete crossing.
Compensatory mitigation requirements will be determined in accordance with the
appropriate district standard operating procedures and processes. The applicant shall
notify the Fort Worth District Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition
32 - Pre-Construction Notification prior to commencing the activity.
13. For all activities proposed for authorization under Nationwide Permits (NWP) 12, 14
and/or 33 that involve a temporary discharge of fill material into 1/2 acre or more of
emergent wetland OR 1/10 acre of scrub-shrub/forested wetland, the applicant shall
notify the Fort Worth District Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition
32 - Pre-Construction Notification prior to commencing the activity.
14. For all discharges proposed for authorization under Nationwide Permits (NWP) 51
and 52, the Fort Worth District will provide the pre-construction notification (PCN) to the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as specified in NWP General Condition 32(d)(2) - PCN
for its review and comments.
The following regional conditions apply only within the Galveston District.
15. No Nationwide Permits (NWP), except NWP 3, shall be used to authorize
discharges into the habitat types or specific areas listed in paragraphs a through c,
below. The applicant shall notify the Galveston District Engineer in accordance with the
NWP General Condition 32 - Pre-Construction Notification prior to commencing the
activity under NWP 3.
2017 Nationwide Permit Regional Conditions For The State Of Texas Page 4 of 6
a. Mangrove Marshes. For the purpose of this regional condition, Mangrove
marshes are those waters of the United States that are dominated by mangroves
(Avicennia spp., Laguncuaria spp., Conocarpus spp., and Rhizophora spp.).
b. Coastal Dune Swales. For the purpose of this regional condition, coastal
dune swales are wetlands and/or other waters of the United States located within
the backshore and dune areas in the coastal zone of Texas. They are formed as
depressions within and among multiple beach ridge barriers, dune complexes, or
dune areas adjacent to beaches fronting tidal waters of the United States.
c. Columbia Bottomlands. For the purpose of this regional condition, Columbia
bottomlands are defined as waters of the United States that are dominated by
bottomland hardwoods in the Lower Brazos and San Bernard River basins
identified in the 1997 Memorandum of Agreement between the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Natural
Resource Conservation Service, and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for
bottomland hardwoods in Brazoria County. (For further information, see
http://www.swg.usace.army.mil/Business-With-
Us/Regulatory/Permits/Nationwide-General-Permits/)
16. A Compensatory Mitigation Plan is required for all special aquatic site losses, as
defined in Section F of the Nationwide Permits (NWP), that exceed 1/10 acre and/or for
all losses to streams that exceed 200 linear feet. Compensatory mitigation
requirements will be determined in accordance with the appropriate district standard
operating procedures and processes. The applicant shall notify the Galveston District
Engineer in accordance with the NWP General Condition 32 - Pre-Construction
Notification prior to commencing the activity.
17. For all seismic testing activities proposed for authorization under Nationwide Permit
(NWP) 6, the applicant shall notify the Galveston District Engineer in accordance with
the NWP General Condition 32 - Pre-Construction Notification (PCN). The PCN must
state the time period for which the temporary fill is proposed, and must include a
restoration plan for the special aquatic sites. For seismic testing under NWP 6 within
the Cowardin Marine System, Subtidal Subsystem; as defined by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United
States, December 1979/Reprinted 1992, the Corps will coordinate with the resource
agencies in accordance with NWP General Condition 32(d) - PCN.
18. For all activities proposed under Nationwide Permits (NWP) 10 and 11 located in
vegetated shallows and coral reefs; as defined by 40 CFR 230.43 and 230.44
respectively, the applicant shall notify the Galveston District Engineer in accordance
with the NWP General Condition 32 - Pre-Construction Notification. Examples include,
but are not limited to: seagrass beds, oyster reefs, and coral reefs.
19. Nationwide Permit 12 shall not be used to authorize discharges within 500 feet of
vegetated shallows and coral reefs; as defined by 40 CFR 230.43 and 230.44
respectively. Examples include, but are not limited to: seagrass beds, oyster reefs, and
coral reefs.
2017 Nationwide Permit Regional Conditions For The State Of Texas Page 5 of 6
20. For all activities proposed for authorization under Nationwide Permit 12 that involve
underground placement below a non-navigable river bed and/or perennial stream bed
there shall a minimum cover of 48 inches (1,219 millimeters) of soil below the river
and/or perennial stream thalweg.
21. For all discharges and work proposed below the high tide line under Nationwide
Permits (NWP) 14 and 18, the applicant shall notify the Galveston District Engineer in
accordance with the NWP General Condition 32 - Pre-Construction Notification (PCN).
The Galveston District will coordinate with the resource agencies in accordance with
NWP General Condition 32(d) - PCN.
22. For all activities proposed for authorization under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 33 the
applicant shall notify the Galveston District Engineer in accordance with the NWP
General Condition 32 – Pre-Construction Notification (PCN). The PCN must include a
restoration plan showing how all temporary fills and structures will be removed and the
area restored to pre-project conditions. Activities causing the temporary loss, as
defined in Section F of the NWPs, of more than 0.5 acres of tidal waters and/or 200
linear feet of stream will be coordinated with the agencies in accordance with NWP
General Condition 32(d) - PCN.
23. No Nationwide Permits (NWP), except NWPs 3, 16, 20, 22, 37, shall be used to
authorize discharges, structures, and/or fill within the standard setback and high hazard
zones of the Sabine-Neches Waterway as defined in the Standard Operating Procedure
- Permit Setbacks along the Sabine-Neches Waterway. The applicant shall notify the
Galveston District Engineer in accordance with NWP General Condition 32 - Pre-
Construction Notification for all discharge, structures and/or work in medium hazard
zones and all NWP 3 applications within the standard setback and high hazard zones of
the Sabine-Neches Waterway.
24. No Nationwide Permits (NWP), except 20, 22, and 37, shall be used to authorize
discharges, structures, and/or fill within the standard setback exemptions of the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway as defined in the Standard Operating Procedure- Department of
the Army Permit Evaluation Setbacks along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The
applicant shall notify the Galveston District Engineer in accordance with NWP General
Condition 32 (Pre-Construction Notification) for all discharges, structures and/or work
within the standard setback, shoreward of the standard setback, and/or standard
setback exemption zones.
25. The use of Nationwide Permits in the San Jacinto River Waste Pits Area of
Concern are revoked. (For further information, see
http://www.swg.usace.army.mil/Business-With-Us/Regulatory/Permits/Nationwide-
General-Permits/)
26. The use of Nationwide Permits 51 and 52 are revoked within the Galveston District
boundaries.
2017 Nationwide Permit Regional Conditions For The State Of Texas Page 6 of 6
27. Nationwide Permit (NWP) 53 pre-construction notifications will be coordinated with
resource agencies as specified in NWP General Condition 32(d) – Pre-construction
Notification.
28. For all activities proposed under Nationwide Permits (NWP) 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43,
44, and 50 that result in greater than 300 feet of loss in intermittent and/or ephemeral
streams, as defined in Section F of the NWPs, require evaluation under an Individual
Permit.
The following regional conditions apply only within the Tulsa District.
29. Upland Disposal: Except where authorized by Nationwide Permit 16, material
disposed of in uplands shall be placed in a location and manner that prevents discharge
of the material and/or return water into waters or wetlands unless otherwise authorized
by the Tulsa District Engineer.
30. Major Rivers: The prospective permittee shall notify the Tulsa District Engineer for
all Nationwide Permit 14 verifications which cross major rivers within Tulsa District. For
the purposes of this condition, major rivers include the following: Canadian River, Prairie
Dog Town Fork of the Red River, and Red River.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST
Updated: April 09, 2021
The Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Products List has been developed to
minimize the submittal review of products which meet the Fort Worth Water
Department’s Standard Specifications during utility construction projects. When
Technical Specifications for specific products, are included as part of the
Construction Contract Documents, the requirements of the Technical Specification
will override the Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Specifications and the
Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard Products List and approval of the
specific products will be based on the requirements of the Technical Specification
whether or not the specific product meets the Fort Worth Water Department’s
Standard Specifications or is on the Fort Worth Water Department’s Standard
Products List.
Table of Content
(Click on items to go directly to the page)
Items Page
A.Water & Sewer
1. Manholes & Bases/Components ........................................................... 1
2.Manholes & Bases/Fiberglass ............................................................... 2
3.Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Rectangular ............................... 3
4.Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Round ....................................... 4
5.Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Water Tight & Pressure Tight .. 5
6.Manholes & Bases/Precast Concrete .................................................... 6
7.Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/Cementitious ................................ 7
8.Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/NonCementitious ......................... 8
9.Manhole Insert (Field Operations Use Only) ........................................ 9
10. Pipe Casing Spacer ............................................................................... 10
11. Pipes/Ductile Iron ................................................................................. 11
12. Utility Line Marker ............................................................................... 12
B.Sewer
13. Coatings/Epoxy ..................................................................................... 13
14. Coatings/Polyurethane .......................................................................... 14
15. Combination Air Valves ....................................................................... 15
16. Pipes/Concrete ...................................................................................... 16
17. Pipe Enlargement System (Method} ..............................................
1$. Pipes.lFiUerglass Reinforced Pipe ..................................................
19. PipesIHDPE ...................................................................................
2Q. PipeslPiiC (Pressi�re Sewer} ..........................................................
21. PipesIPVC* ....................................................................................
22. PipeslRehabICIPP ..........................................................................
23. PipeslItehablFald & Fai�i .............................................................
24. Pipe��Qpen Pro�le Large Diaineter ...............................................
17
18
19
2U
21
22
23
24
C. VLrater
25. Appw�tenances ....................................................................................... 2S
25. Balts, Nuts, and Gasl�ets ....................................................................... 26
27. Cainbination Au� Release Valve ........................................................... 27
28. Diy Barrel Fu�e Hyrit�ants ...................................................................... 28
29. Meters ................................................................................................... 29
30. PipeslP�iC (Pressi�re Water) ................................................................. 3U
31. Pipe5.lValves & Fittiv�slI]uctile I�on Fittings ....................................... 31
32. PipeslValves & Fittiv�slResilient Seated Gate Val�e .......................... 32
33. Pipe5.1�'alves & Fittiv�slRi2bber Seated Butterfly Val�e ...................... 33
34. Palyethylene En�asentent ..................................................................... 34
35. Sainplivg Stations ................................................................................. 35
3fi. Autornati� Flus}�er ................................................................................. 36
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeWater & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Components 33-39-10 (Rev 2/3/16)07/23/97 33 05 13 Urethane Hydrophilic WaterstopAsahi Kogyo K.K.Adeka Ultra-Seal P-201ASTM D2240/D412/D79204/26/00 33 05 13 Offset Joint for 4' Diam. MHHanson Concrete ProductsDrawing No. 35-0048-00104/26/00 33 05 13 Profile Gasket for 4' Diam. MH.Press-Seal Gasket Corp.250-4G GasketASTM C-443/C-361SS MH1/26/99 33 05 13 HDPE Manhole Adjustment RingsLadtech, IncHDPE Adjustment RingNon-traffic area5/13/05 33 05 13 Manhole External WrapCanusa - CPSWrapidSeal Manhole Encapsulation SystemCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content1Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Fiberglass 33-39-13 (1/8/13)1/26/99 33 39 13 Fiberglass ManholeFluid Containment, Inc.FlowtiteASTM 3753Non-traffic area08/30/06 33 39 13 Fiberglass ManholeL.F. ManufacturingNon-traffic area* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content2Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Rectangular 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversWestern Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry100124"x40" WD* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content3Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversWestern Iron Works, Bass & Hays Foundry3002424" Dia.*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversMcKinley Iron Works Inc.A 24 AM24" Dia.08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryR-1272ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30624" Dia.08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryR- 165-LM (Hinged)ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30624" Dia.08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryNF 1274ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30630" Dia.08/24/18 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah FoundryR-1743-LM (Hinged)ASTM A48 & AASHTO M30630" dia.33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversSigma CorporationMH-144N33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversSigma CorporationMH-143N33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversPont-A-MoussonGTS-STD24" dia.33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah Casting24" dia.10/31/06 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers (Hinged)PowersealHinged Ductile Iron Manhole ASTM A53624" Dia.7/25/03 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversSaint-Gobain Pipelines (Pamrex/rexus)RE32-R8FS30" Dia.01/31/06 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and CoverEast Jordan Iron WorksV1432-2 and V1483 DesignsAASHTO M306-0430" Dia.11/02/10 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and CoverSigma CorporationMH1651FWN & MH1650230" Dia07/19/11 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and CoverStar Pipe ProductsMH32FTWSS-DC 30" Dia08/10/11 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and CoverAccucast220700 Heavy Duty with Gasket Ring30" Dia10/14/13 33 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover (Hinged & Lockable)East Jordan Iron Works 30" ERGO XL Assembly with Cam Lock/MPIC/T-Gasket ASSHTO M105 & ASTM A53630" Dia06/01/17 34 05 13 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover (Hinged & Lockable) CISIP Industries2280 (32")ASTM A 4830" Dia.09/16/19 33 05 13.10 30" Dia. MH Ring and Cover Composite Access Products, L.P.CAP-ONE-30-FTW, Composite, w/ Lock w/o Hing30" Dia.* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content4Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Water Tight & Pressure Tight 33-05-13 (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversPont-A-MoussonPamtight24" Dia.*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversNeenah Casting24" Dia.*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversWestern Iron Works,Bass & Hays Foundry300-24P24" Dia.*33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversMcKinley Iron Works Inc.WPA24AM24" Dia.03/08/00 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and CoversAccucastRC-2100ASTM A 4824" Dia.04/20/01 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers(SIP)Serampore Industries Private Ltd.300-24-23.75 Ring and CoverASTM A 4824" Dia.* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content5Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Precast Concrete (Rev 1/8/13)*33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteHydro Conduit CorpSPL Item #49ASTM C 47848"*33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteWall Concrete Pipe Co. Inc.ASTM C-44348"09/23/96 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteConcrete Product Inc.48" I.D. Manhole w/ 32" ConeASTM C 47848" w/32" cone05/08/18 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteThe Turner Company48", 60" I.D. Manhole w/ 32" ConeASTM C 47848", 60"10/27/06 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast ConcreteOldcastle Precast Inc.48" I.D. Manhole w/ 24" ConeASTM C 47848" Diam w 24" Ring06/09/10 33 39 10 Manhole, Precast (Reinforce Polymer)ConcreteUS Composite PipeReinforced Polymer Concrete ASTM C-7648" to 72"09/06/19 33 39 20 Manhole, Precast ConcreteForterra Pipe and Precast60" & 72" I.D. Manhole w/32" ConeASTM C-7660" & 72"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content6Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/Cementitious*E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsQuadex04/23/01E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsStandard Cement Materials, Inc.Reliner MSPE1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsAP/M Permaform4/20/01E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemStrong CompanyStrong Seal MS2A Rehab System5/12/03E1-14 Manhole Rehab System (Liner)Poly-triplex TechnologiesMH repair product to stop infiltrationASTM D581308/30/06General Concrete RepairFlexKrete TechnologiesVinyl Polyester Repair ProductMisc. Use* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content7Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Rehab Systems/NonCementitious05/20/96E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsSprayroq, Spray Wall Polyurethane CoatingASTM D639/D790*E1-14 Manhole Rehab SystemsSun Coast12/14/01Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior)ERTECHSeries 20230 and 2100 (Asphatic Emulsion)For Exterior Coating of Concrete Structures Only01/31/06Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionChestertonArc 791, S1HB, S1, S2Acid Resistance TestSewer Applications8/28/2006Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionWarren EnvironmentalS-301 and M-301Sewer Applications08/30/06Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionCitadelSLS-30 Solids EpoxySewer Applications03/19/1833 05 16, 33 39 10, 33 39 20 Coating for Corrosion protection(Exterior)Sherwin WilliamsRR&C Dampproofing Non-Fibered Spray Grade (Asphatic Emulsion)For Exterior Coating of Concrete Structures Only* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content8Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Manhole Inserts - Field Operations Use Only (Rev 2/3/16)*33 05 13 Manhole InsertKnutson EnterprisesMade to Order - PlasticASTM D 1248For 24" dia.*33 05 13 Manhole InsertSouth Western PackagingMade to Order - PlasticASTM D 1248For 24" dia.*33 05 13 Manhole InsertNoflow-InflowMade to Order - PlasticASTM D 1248For 24" dia.09/23/96 33 05 13 Manhole InsertSouthwestern Packing & Seals, Inc.LifeSaver - Stainless SteelFor 24" dia.09/23/96 33 05 13 Manhole InsertSouthwestern Packing & Seals, Inc.TetherLok - Stainless SteelFor 24" dia* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content9Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Pipe Casing Spacers 33-05-24 (07/01/13)11/04/02Steel Band Casing SpacersAdvanced Products and Systems, Inc.Carbon Steel Spacers, Model SI02/02/93Stainless Steel Casing SpacerAdvanced Products and Systems, Inc.Stainless Steel Spacer, Model SSI04/22/87Casing SpacersCascade Waterworks ManufacturingCasing Spacers09/14/10Stainless Steel Casing SpacerPipeline Seal and InsulatorStainless Steel Casing SpacerUp to 48"09/14/10Coated Steel Casin SpacersPipeline Seal and InsulatorCoated Steel Casin SpacersUp to 48" 05/10/11Stainless Steel Casing SpacerPowerseal4810 PowerchockUp to 48"03/19/18Casing SpacersBWMSS-12 Casing Spacer(Stainless Steel)03/19/18Casing SpacersBWMFB-12 Casing Spacer (Coated Carbon Steel) for Non_pressure Pipe and Grouted Casing* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content10Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Pipes/Ductile Iron 33-11-10(1/8/13)*33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeGriffin Pipe Products, Co.Super Bell-Tite Ductile Iron Pressure Pipe, AWWA C150, C1513" thru 24"08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeAmerican Ductile Iron Pipe Co.American Fastite Pipe (Bell Spigot)AWWA C150, C1514" thru 30"08/24/18 33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeAmerican Ductile Iron Pipe Co.American Flex Ring (Restrained Joint)AWWA C150, C1514" thru 30"*33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeU.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.AWWA C150, C151*33 11 10 Ductile Iron PipeMcWane Cast Iron Pipe Co.AWWA C150, C151* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content11Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water & Sewer - Utility Line Marker (08/24/2018)* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content12Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Coatings/Epoxy 33-39-60 (01/08/13)02/25/02Epoxy Lining SystemSauereisen, IncSewerGard 210RSLA County #210-1.3312/14/01Epoxy Lining SystemErtech Technical CoatingsErtech 2030 and 2100 Series04/14/05Interior Ductile Iron Pipe CoatingInduronProtecto 401ASTM B-117Ductile Iron Pipe Only01/31/06Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionChestertonArc 791, S1HB, S1, S2Acid Resistance TestSewer Applications8/28/2006Coatings for Corrosion ProtectionWarren EnvironmentalS-301 and M-301Sewer Applications* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content13Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Coatings/Polyurethane* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content14Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Combination Air Valves 05/25/18 33-31-70 Air Release ValveA.R.I. USA, Inc.D025LTP02(Composite Body)2"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content15Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Concrete*E1-04 Conc. Pipe, ReinforcedWall Concrete Pipe Co. Inc.ASTM C 76*E1-04 Conc. Pipe, ReinforcedHydro Conduit CorporationClass III T&G, SPL Item #77ASTM C 76*E1-04 Conc. Pipe, ReinforcedHanson Concrete ProductsSPL Item #95-Manhole, #98- PipeASTM C 76*E1-04 Conc. Pipe, ReinforcedConcrete Pipe & Products Co. Inc.ASTM C 76* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content16Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipe Enlargment System (Method)33-31-23 (01/18/13)PIM SystemPIM CorporationPolyethylenePIM Corp., Piscata Way, N.J. Approved PreviouslyMcConnell SystemsMcLat ConstructionPolyethyleneHouston, TexasApproved PreviouslyTRS SystemsTrenchless Replacement SystemPolyethyleneCalgary, CanadaApproved Previously* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content17Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipe/Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe 33-31-13(1/8/13)7/21/97 33 31 13 Cent. Cast Fiberglass (FRP)Hobas Pipe USA, Inc.Hobas Pipe (Non-Pressure)ASTM D3262/D375403/22/10 33 31 13 Fiberglass Pipe (FRP)AmeronBondstrand RPMP PipeASTM D3262/D375404/09/21Glass-Fiber Reinforced Polymer Pipe (FRP)Thompson Pipe GroupThompson Pipe (Flowtite)ASTM D3262/D37544/14/05Polymer Modified Concrete PipeAmitech USAMeyer Polycrete PipeASTM C33, A276, F4778" to 102", Class V06/09/10E1-9 Reinforced Polymer Concrete PipeUS Composite PipeReinforced Polymer Concrete PipeASTM C-76* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content18Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/HDPE 33-31-23(1/8/13)*High-density polyethylene pipePhillips Driscopipe, Inc.Opticore Ductile Polyethylene PipeASTM D 12488"*High-density polyethylene pipePlexco Inc.ASTM D 12488"*High-density polyethylene pipePolly Pipe, Inc.ASTM D 12488"High-density polyethylene pipeCSR Hydro Conduit/Pipeline SystemsMcConnell Pipe EnlargementASTM D 1248* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content19Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/PVC (Pressure Sewer) 33-11-12 (4/1/13)12/02/11 33-11-12 DR-14 PVC Pressure PipePipelife JetstreamPVC Pressure PipeAWWA C9004" thru 12"10/22/14 33-11-12 DR-14 PVC Pressure PipeRoyal Building ProductsRoyal Seal PVC Pressure PipeAWWA C9004" thru 12"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content20Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/PVC* 33-31-20 (7/1/13)*33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co., Inc. (JM Eagle)SDR-26ASTM D 30344" - 15"12/23/97* 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationSDR-26ASTM D 30344" thru 15"*33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeLamson Vylon PipeASTM F 7894" thru 15"01/18/18 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeVinyltech PVC PipeGravity SewerASTM D30344" thru 15"11/11/98 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeDiamond Plastics Corporation "S" Gravity Sewer PipeASTM F 67918" to 27"*33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co, Inc. (JM Eagle)SDR 26/35 PS 115/46ASTM F 67918" - 28"09/11/12 33-31-20 PVC Sewer PipePipelife Jet StreamSDR-26 and SDR-35ASTM F-67918"05/06/0533-31-20PVC Solid Wall PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationSDR 26/35 PS 115/46ASTM F-67918" to 48"04/27/0633-31-20PVC Sewer Fittings HarcoSDR-26 and SDR-35 Gasket Fittings ASTM D-3034, D-1784, etc4" - 15"*33-31-20PVC Sewer FittingsPlastic Trends, In.cGasketed PVC Sewer Main FittingsASTM D 30343/19/2018 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipePipelife Jet StreamSDR 35ASTM F67918"- 24"3/19/2018 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipePipelife Jet StreamSDR 26ASTM D30344"- 15"3/29/2019 33 31 20Gasketed Fittings (PVC)GPK Products, Inc.SDR 26ASTM D3034/F-6794"- 15"10/21/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipeNAPCOSDR 26ASTM D30344" - 15"10/22/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipeSanderson Pipe Corp.SDR 26ASTM D30344"- 15"10/21/2020 33 31 20 PVC Sewer PipeNAPCOSDR 26/35 PS 115/46ASTM F-67918"- 36"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content21Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Rehab/CIPP 33-31-12 (01/18/13)*Cured in Place PipeInsituform Texark, IncASTM F 121605/03/99Cured in Place PipeNational Envirotech GroupNational Liner, (SPL) Item #27ASTM F-1216/D-581305/29/96Cured in Place PipeReynolds Inc/Inliner Technolgy (Inliner USA)Inliner TechnologyASTM F 1216* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content22Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Rehab/Fold & Form*Fold and Form PipeCullum Pipe Systems, Inc.11/03/98Fold and Form PipeInsituform Technologies, Inc.Insituform "NuPIpe"ASTM F-1504Fold and Form PipeAmerican Pipe & Plastics, Inc.Demo. Purpose Only12/04/00Fold and Form PipeUltralinerUltraliner PVC Alloy PipelinerASTM F-1504, 1871, 186706/09/03Fold and Form PipeMiller Pipeline Corp.EX MethodASTM F-1504, F-1947Up to 18" diameter* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content23Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Sewer - Pipes/Open Profile Large Diameter09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, RibbedLamson Vylon PipeCarlon Vylon H.C. Closed Profile Pipe,ASTM F 67918" to 48"09/26/91 E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, RibbedExtrusion Technologies, Inc.Ultra-Rib Open Profile Sewer PipeASTM F 67918" to 48"E100-2 PVC Sewer Pipe, RibbedUponor ETI Company11/10/10 (E100-2) Polypropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Double WallAdvanced Drainage Systems (ADS) SaniTite HP Double Wall (Corrugated)ASTM F 273624"-30"11/10/10 (E100-2) Polypropylene (PP) Sewer Pipe, Triple WallAdvanced Drainage Systems (ADS)SaniTite HP Triple Wall PipeASTM F 276430" to 60"05/16/11Steel Reinforced Polyethylene PipeConTech Construction ProductsDurmaxxASTM F 256224" to 72"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content24Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Appurtenances 33-12-10 (07/01/13)01/18/18 33-12-10 Double Strap SaddleRomac202NS Nylon CoatedAWWA C8001"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe08/28/02Double Strap SaddleSmith Blair #317 Nylon Coated Double Strap Saddle07/23/12 33-12-10 Double Strap Service SaddleMueller CompanyDR2S Double (SS) Strap DI SaddleAWWA C8001"-2" SVC, up to 24" Pipe10/27/87Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMcDonald6100M,6100MT & 610MT 3/4" and 1"10/27/87Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMcDonald4603B, 4604B, 6100M, 6100TM and 6101M 1½" and 2"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesFord Meter Box Co., Inc.FB600-7NL, FB1600-7-NL, FV23-777-W-NL, L22-77NLAWWA C8002"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesFord Meter Box Co., Inc.FB600-6-NL, FB1600-6-NL, FV23-666-W-NL, L22-66NLAWWA C8001-1/2"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesFord Meter Box Co., Inc.FB600-4-NL, FB1600-4-NL, B11-444-WR-NL, B22444-WR-NL, L28-44NLAWWA C8001"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMueller Co., Ltd.B-25000N, B-24277N-3, B-20200N-3, H-15000N, , H-1552N, H142276NAWWA C800, ANSF 61, ANSI/NSF 3722"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMueller Co., Ltd.B-25000N, B-20200N-3, B-24277N-3,H-15000N, H-14276N, H-15525NAWWA C800, ANSF 61, ANSI/NSF 3721-1/2"5/25/2018 33-12-10 Curb Stops-Ball Meter ValvesMueller Co., Ltd.B-25000N, B-20200N-3,H-15000N, H-15530NAWWA C800, ANSF 61, ANSI/NSF 3721"01/26/00Coated Tapping Saddle with Double SS StrapsJCM Industries, Inc.#406 Double Band SS Saddle1"-2" Taps on up to 12" 0/5/21/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel)JCM Industries, Inc.412 Tapping Sleeve ESSAWWA C-223Up to 30" w/12" Out05/10/11Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel)Powerseal3490AS (Flange) & 3490MJ4"-8" and 16"02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Coated Steel)RomacFTS 420AWWA C-223U p to 42" w/24" Out02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel)RomacSST Stainless SteelAWWA C-223Up to 24" w/12" Out02/29/12 33-12-25 Tapping Sleeve (Stainless Steel)RomacSST III Stainless SteelAWWA C-223Up to 30" w/12" Out05/10/11Joint Repair ClampPowerseal3232 Bell Joint Repair Clamp4" to 30"Plastic Meter Box w/Composite LidDFW Plastics Inc.DFW37C-12-1EPAF FTWPlastic Meter Box w/Composite LidDFW Plastics Inc.DFW39C-12-1EPAF FTW08/30/06Plastic Meter Box w/Composite LidDFW Plastics Inc.DFW65C-14-1EPAF FTWClass "A"Concrete Meter BoxBass & HaysCMB37-B12 1118 LID-9Concrete Meter BoxBass & HaysCMB-18-Dual 1416 LID-9Concrete Meter BoxBass & HaysCMB65-B65 1527 LID-9* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content25Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Bolts, Nuts, and Gaskets 33-11-05 (01/08/13)* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content26Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Combination Air Release 33-31-70 (01/08/13)*E1-11 Combination Air Release ValveGA Industries, Inc.Empire Air and Vacuum Valve, Model 935 ASTM A 126 Class B, ASTM A 240 - float, ASTM A 307 - Cover Bolts1" & 2"*E1-11 Combination Air Release ValveMultiplex Manufacturing Co.Crispin Air and Vacuum Valves, Model No. 1/2", 1" & 2"*E1-11 Combination Air Release ValveValve and Primer Corp.APCO #143C, #145C and #147C1", 2" & 3"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content27Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Dry Barrel Fire Hydrants 33-12-40 (01/15/14)10/01/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantAmerican-Darling ValveDrawing Nos. 90-18608, 94-18560AWWA C-50203/31/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantAmerican Darling ValveShop Drawing No. 94-18791 AWWA C-50209/30/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantClow CorporationShop Drawing No. D-19895AWWA C-50201/12/93 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantAmerican AVK CompanyModel 2700AWWA C-50208/24/88 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantClow CorporationDrawings D20435, D20436, B20506AWWA C-502E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantITT Kennedy ValveShop Drawing No. D-80783FWAWWA C-50209/24/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantM&H Valve CompanyShop Drawing No. 13476AWWA C-50210/14/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantMueller CompanyShop Drawings No. 6461 A-423 CenturionAWWA C-50201/15/88E1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantMueller CompanyShop Drawing FH-12A-423 Super Centurion 200AWWA C-50210/09/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantU.S. Pipe & FoundryShop Drawing No. 960250AWWA C-50209/16/87 E-1-12 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantWaterous CompanyShop Drawing No. SK740803AWWA C-50208/12/16 33-12-40 Dry Barrel Fire HydrantEJ (East Jordan Iron Works)WaterMaster 5CD250* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content28Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Meters02/05/93 E101-5 Detector Check MeterAmes CompanyModel 1000 Detector Check ValveAWWA C5504" - 10"08/05/04Magnetic Drive Vertical TurbineHerseyMagnetic Drive VerticalAWWA C701, Class 13/4" - 6"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content29Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/PVC (Pressure Water) 33-31-70 (01/08/13)01/18/18 33-11-12 PVC Pressure PipeVinyltech PVC PipeDR14AWWA C900, AWWA C605, ASTM D17844"-12"3/19/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipePipelife Jet StreamDR14AWWA C9004"-12"3/19/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipePipelife Jet StreamDR18AWWA C90016"-24"5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationDR 14AWWA C9004"-12"5/25/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeDiamond Plastics CorporationDR 18AWWA C90016"-24"12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co., Inc d/b/a JM EagleDR 14AWWA C900-16UL 1285ANSI/NSF 61FM 16124"-28"12/6/2018 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeJ-M Manufacturing Co., Inc d/b/a JM EagleDR 18AWWA C900-16UL 1285ANSI/NSF 61FM 161216"-24"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeUnderground Solutions Inc.DR14 Fusible PVCAWWA C9004" - 8"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeNAPCODR18AWWA C90016" - 24"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeNAPCODR14AWWA C9004"- 12"9/6/2019 33 11 12 PVC Pressure PipeSanderson Pipe Corp.DR14AWWA C9004"- 12"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content30Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Ductile Iron Fittings 33-11-11 (01/08/13)07/23/92E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsStar Pipe Products, Inc.Mechanical Joint FittingsAWWA C153 & C110*E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsGriffin Pipe Products, Co.Mechanical Joint FittingsAWWA C 110*E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsMcWane/Tyler Pipe/ Union Utilities DivisionMechanical Joint Fittings, SSB Class 350AWWA C 153, C 110, C 11108/11/98E1-07 Ductile Iron FittingsSigma, Co.Mechanical Joint Fittings, SSB Class 351AWWA C 153, C 110, C 11202/26/14E1-07 MJ FittingsAccucastClass 350 C-153 MJ FittingsAWWA C1534"-12"05/14/98E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint RestraintsFord Meter Box Co./Uni-FlangeUni-Flange Series 1400 AWWA C111/C1534" to 36"05/14/98E1-24 PVC Joint RestraintsFord Meter Box Co./Uni-FlangeUni-Flange Series 1500 Circle-LockAWWA C111/C1534" to 24" 11/09/04E1-07 Ductile Iron Joint RestraintsOne Bolt, Inc.One Bolt Restrained Joint FittingAWWA C111/C116/C1534" to 12"02/29/12 33-11-11 Ductile Iron Pipe Mechanical Joint RestraintEBAA Iron, Inc.Megalug Series 1100 (for DI Pipe)AWWA C111/C116/C1534" to 42"02/29/12 33-11-11 PVC Pipe Mechanical Joint RestraintEBAA Iron, Inc.Megalug Series 2000 (for PVC Pipe)AWWA C111/C116/C1534" to 24"08/05/04E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC)Sigma, Co.Sigma One-Lok SLC4 - SLC10AWWA C111/C1534" to 10"03/06/19 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC)Sigma, Co.Sigma One-Lok SLCS4 - SLCS12AWWA C111/C1534" to 12"08/05/04E1-07 Mechanical Joint Retainer Glands(PVC)Sigma, Co.Sigma One-Lok SLCEAWWA C111/C15312" to 24"08/10/98E1-07 MJ Fittings(DIP)Sigma, Co.Sigma One-Lok SLDEAWWA C1534" - 24"10/12/10E1-24 Interior Restrained Joint SystemS & B Techncial ProductsBulldog System ( Diamond Lok 21 & JM Eagle ASTM F-16244" to 12"08/16/06E1-07 Mechanical Joint FittingsSIP Industries(Serampore)Mechanical Joint FittingsAWWA C1534" to 24"11/07/16 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsStar Pipe Products, Inc.PVC Stargrip Series 4000ASTM A536 AWWA C11111/07/16 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsStar Pipe Products, Inc.DIP Stargrip Series 3000ASTM A536 AWWA C11103/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsSIP Industries(Serampore)EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Black For DIPASTM A536 AWWA C1113"-48"03/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsSIP Industries(Serampore)EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900 DR14 PVC PipeASTM A536 AWWA C1114"-12"03/19/18 33-11-11 Mechanical Joint Retainer GlandsSIP Industries(Serampore)EZ Grip Joint Restraint (EZD) Red for C900 DR18 PVC PipeASTM A536 AWWA C11116"-24"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content31Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Resilient Seated Gate Valve* 33-12-20 (05/13/15)Resilient Wedged Gate Valve w/no GearsAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2500 Drawing # 94-2024716"12/13/02Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2530 and Series 2536AWWA C51530" and 36"08/31/99Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2520 & 2524 (SD 94-20255)AWWA C51520" and 24"05/18/99Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2516 (SD 94-20247)AWWA C51516"10/24/00E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow ControlSeries 2500 (Ductile Iron)AWWA C5154" to 12"08/05/04Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican Flow Control42" and 48" AFC 2500AWWA C51542" and 48"05/23/91E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican AVK CompanyAmerican AVK Resilient Seaded GVAWWA C5094" to 12"01/24/02E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveAmerican AVK Company20" and smaller*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveKennedy4" - 12"*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveM&H4" - 12"*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveMueller Co.4" - 12"11/08/99Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Mueller Co.Series A2361 (SD 6647)AWWA C51516"01/23/03Resilient Wedge Gate ValveMueller Co.Series A2360 for 18"-24" (SD 6709)AWWA C51524" and smaller05/13/05Resilient Wedge Gate ValveMueller Co.Mueller 30" & 36", C-515AWWA C51530" and 36"01/31/06Resilient Wedge Gate ValveMueller Co.Mueller 42" & 48", C-515AWWA C51542" and 48"01/28/88E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve Co.AWWA C5094" - 12"10/04/94Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve Co.16" RS GV (SD D-20995)AWWA C51516"11/08/99E1-26 Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve Co.Clow RW Valve (SD D-21652)AWWA C51524" and smaller11/29/04Resilient Wedge Gate Valve Clow Valve Co.Clow 30" & 36" C-515AWWA C51530" and 36" (Note 3)11/30/12Resilient Wedge Gate ValveClow Valve Co.Clow Valve Model 2638AWWA C51524" to 48" (Note 3)05/08/91E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveStockham Valves & FittingsAWWA C 509, ANSI 420 - stem, ASTM A 276 Type 304 - Bolts & nuts4" - 12"*E1-26 Resilient Seated Gate ValveU.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.Metroseal 250, requirements SPL #743" to 16"10/26/16 33-12-20 Resilient Seated Gate ValveEJ (East Jordan Iron Works)EJ FlowMaster Gate Valve & Boxes08/24/18Matco Gate Valve Matco-Norca225 MRAWWA/ANSI C115/An21.154" to 16"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content32Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Pipes/Valves & Fittings/Rubber Seated Butterfly Valve 33-12-21 (07/10/14)*E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveHenry Pratt Co.AWWA C-50424"*E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveMueller Co.AWWA C-50424"and smaller1/11/99E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveDezurik Valves Co.AWWA C-50424" and larger06/12/03E1-30 Valmatic American Butterfly ValveValmatic Valve and Manufacturing Corp. Valmatic American Butterfly Valve.AWWA C-504Up to 84" diameter04/06/07E1-30 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveM&H ValveM&H Style 4500 & 1450 AWWA C-50424" to 48"03/19/18 33 12 21 Rubber Seated Butterfly ValveG. A. Industries (Golden Anderson)AWWA C504 Butterfly ValveAWWA C-50430"-54"* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content33Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Polyethylene Encasement 33-11-10 (01/08/13)05/12/05E1-13 Polyethylene EncasmentFlexsol PackagingFulton Enterprises AWWA C1058 mil LLD05/12/05E1-13 Polyethylene EncasmentMountain States Plastics (MSP) and AEP Ind.Standard HardwareAWWA C1058 mil LLD05/12/05E1-13 Polyethylene EncasmentAEP IndustriesBullstrong by Cowtown Bolt & GasketAWWA C1058 mil LLD09/06/19 33-11-11 Polyethylene EncasmentNorthtown Products Inc. PE Encasement for DIPAWWA C1058 mil LLD* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content34Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Sampling Station3/12/96Water Sampling StationWater PlusB20 Water Sampling Station* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content35Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No. ClasssificationManufacturerModel No.National SpecSizeCITY OF FORT WORTHWATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD PRODUCT LISTNote: All water or sewer pipe larger than 15 inch diameter shall be approved for use by the Water Department on a project specific basis. Special bedding may be required for some pipes.Water - Automatic Flusher10/21/20Automated Flushing SystemMueller HydroguardHG6-A-IN-2-BRN-LPRR(Portable) HG2-A-IN--2-PVC-018-LPLG(Permanent)04/09/21Automated Flushing SystemKupferle Foundry CompanyEclipse #9800wc04/09/21Automated Flushing SystemKupferle Foundry CompanyEclipse #9700 (Portable)* From Original Standard Products ListClick to Return to the Table of Content36Updated:04/09/2021
Approval Spec No.Classsification Manufacturer Model No.National Spec Size
Storm Sewer - Manholes & Bases/Frames & Covers/Standard (Round) 33-05-13 (Rev 03/19/2021)
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers AccuCast (Govind Steel Company, LTD)MHRC #220605 ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 **24" Dia
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Cover Neenah Foundry NF-1274-T91 ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 32" Dia
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry NF-1743-LM (Hinged)ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 32" Dia
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frame Neenah Foundry NF-1930-30 ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 32.25" Dia
9/28/2018 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers Neenah Foundry R-1743-HV ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 32" Dia
4/3/2019 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++2279ST ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 **24" Dia
4/3/2019 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers SIP Industries ++2280ST ASTM A48 AASHTO M306 32" Dia
10/8/2020 33 05 13 Manhole Frames and Covers EJ ( Formally East Jordan Iron Works)EJ1033 Z2/A ASTM A536 AASHTO M306 32.25" Dia
CITY OF FORT WORTH
TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST
PAGE 1 OF 3
**Note: All new development and new installation mahnole lids shall meet the minimum 30-inch opening requirement as specified in City Specification 33 05 13. Any smaller opening sizes will only be allowed for existing manholes that require replacement
frames and covers.
Updated: 03/19/2021
* From Original Standard Products List
Approval Spec No.Classsification Manufacturer Model No.National Spec Size
Storm Sewer - Inlet & Structures 33-05-13 (Rev 10/13/2021)
10/08/20 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x3-405-PRECAST**ASTM C913 10' X 3'
10/08/20 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x3-406-PRECAST**ASTM C913 10' X 3'
10/08/20 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x4.5-407-PRECAST**ASTM C913 10' X 4.5'
10/08/20 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Forterrra FRT-10x4.5-420-PRECAST**ASTM C913 10' X 4.5'
10/08/20 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-4X4-409-PRECAST-TOP ASTM C913 4' X 4'
10/08/20 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-4X4-409-PRECAST-BASE ASTM C913 4' X 4'
10/08/20 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-5X5-410-PRECAST-TOP ASTM C913 5' X 5'
10/08/20 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-5X5-410-PRECAST-BASE ASTM C913 5' X 5'
10/08/20 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-TOP ASTM C913 6' X 6'
10/08/20 33 39 20 Manhole Forterrra FRT-6X6-411-PRECAST-BASE ASTM C913 6' X 6'
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-10X3-405-PRECAST INLET**ASTM 615 10' X 3'
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-15X3-405-PRECAST INLET**ASTM 615 15' x 3'
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Curb Inlets Thompson Pipe Group TPG-20X3-405-PRECAST INLET**ASTM 615 20' x 3'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-409-PRECAST TOP ASTM 615 4' X 4'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-409-PRECAST BASE ASTM 615 4' X 4'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-412-PRECAST 4-FT RISER ASTM 615 4' X 4'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-410-PRECAST TOP ASTM 615 5' X 5'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-410-PRECAST BASE ASTM 615 5' X 5'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-412-PRECAST 5-FT RISER ASTM 615 5' X 5'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-411-PRECAST TOP ASTM 615 6' X 6'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-411-PRECAST BASE ASTM 615 6' X 6'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-412-PRECAST 6-FT RISER ASTM 615 6' X 6'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-411-PRECAST TOP ASTM 615 7' X 7'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-411-PRECAST BASE ASTM 615 7' X 7'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-7X7-412-PRECAST 4-FT RISER ASTM 615 7' X 7'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-411-PRECAST TOP ASTM 615 8' X 8'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-411-PRECAST BASE ASTM 615 8' X 8'
3/19/2021 33 39 20 Manhole Thompson Pipe Group TPG-8X8-412-PRECAST 5-FT RISER ASTM 615 8' X 8'
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-4X4-408-PRECAST INLET ASTM 615 4' X 4'
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-5X5-408-PRECAST INLET ASTM 615 5' X 5'
3/19/2021 33 49 20 Drop Inlet Thompson Pipe Group TPG-6X6-408-PRECAST INLET ASTM 615 6' X 6'
CITY OF FORT WORTH
TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST
PAGE 2 OF 3
**Note: Pre-cast inlets are appoved for the stage I portion of the structure (basin) only. Stage II portion of the structure are required to required to be cast in-place. No exceptions to this requirement shall be allowed.
Updated: 10/13/21
* From Original Standard Products List
Approval Spec No.Classsification Manufacturer Model No.National Spec Size
Storm Sewer - Pipes 33-05-13 (Rev 03/19/21)
4/9/2021 33 41 13 Storm Drain Pipes Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (ADS)ADS HP Storm Polypropylene (PP) Pipe ASTM F2881 & AASHTO M330 12" - 60"
CITY OF FORT WORTH
TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION
STANDARD PRODUCT LIST
PAGE 3 OF 3
Updated: 04/14/21