Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Contract 46520
CITY SECITA — o CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXASCONTRACT NO. STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a Texas home-rule municipality (the "CITY"), and Atkins North America, Inc. (Atkins), authorized to do business in Texas, an independent contractor ("Consultant"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study (SWS-058). Article I Scope of Services (1) Consultant hereby agrees to perform as an independent contractor the services set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Attachment "A". These services shall be performed in connection with Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study (SWS-058). (2) Additional services, if any, will be requested in writing by the City. City shall not pay for any work performed by Consultant or its subconsultants, subcontractors and/or suppliers that has not been ordered in writing. It is specifically agreed that Consultant shall not be compensated for any alleged additional work resulting from oral orders of any person. Article II Compensation Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the Fee Schedule shown in Attachment "B". Payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to complete the services described in Attachment "A". However the total fee paid by the City shall not exceed a total of $215,000 unless the City and the Consultant mutually agree upon a fee amount for additional services and amend this Agreement accordingly. The Consultant shall provide monthly invoices to the City. Payment for services rendered shall be due within thirty (30) days of the uncontested performance of the particular m services so ordered and receipt by City of Consultant's invoice for payment of same. rn Acceptance by Consultant of said payment shall operate as and shall release the City from o all claims or liabilities under this Agreement for anything related to, done, or furnished in connection with the services for which payment is made, including any act or omission of the City in connection with such services. 00 City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services RevisionIof 8 Date 9124/2014 Page OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT.WORTml TX Article III Term Unless terminated pursuant to the terms herein, this Agreement shall be for a term of 36 months, beginning upon the date of its execution, or until the completion of the subject matter contemplated herein, whichever occurs first. Article IV Independent Contractor Consultant shall operate hereunder as an independent contractor, and not as an officer, agent, servant, or employee of the City. Consultant shall have exclusive control of and the exclusive right to control the details of its work to be performed hereunder and all persons performing same, and shall be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors. The doctrine of respondent superior shall not apply as between City and Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors, and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between City and Consultant. Article V Professional Competence and Indemnification (1) Work performed by Consultant shall comply in all aspects with all applicable local, state and federal laws and with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the local, state and national boards, bureaus and agencies. Approval by the City shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant or its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of its services performed hereunder. (2) In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City against liability for any damage caused by or resulting from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by the Consultant or Consultant's agent, consultant under contract, or another entity over which the Consultant's exercises control. City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Revision Date:9/24/2014 Page 2 of 8 Article VI Insurance (1) Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required under this Article and the City has approved such insurance, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all similar insurance of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approval given by the City; provided, however, Consultant may elect to add any subconsultant as an additional insured under its liability policies. Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 each accident (or reasonably equivalent limits of coverage if written on a split limits basis). Coverage shall be on any vehicle used in the course of the Project. Worker's Compensation Coverage A: statutory limits Coverage B: $100,000 each accident $500,000 disease - policy limit $100,000 disease - each employee (2) Additional Insurance Requirements a. Except for employer's liability insurance coverage under Consultant's worker's compensation insurance policy, the City, its officers, employees and servants shall be endorsed as an additional insured on Consultant's insurance policies. b. Certificates of insurance shall be delivered to the Transportation and Public Works Department, Stormwater Management, Attention: Mary Hanna, P.E., 1000 Throckmorton Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102, prior to commencement of work. c. Any failure on part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements specified herein. d. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide the City a minimum thirty days notice of cancellation, non-renewal, and/or material change in policy terms or coverage. A ten days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Revision Date:9124/2014 Page 3 of 8 e. Insurers must be authorized to do business in the State of Texas and have a current A.M. Best rating of A: VII or equivalent measure of financial strength and solvency. f. Other than worker's compensation insurance, in lieu of traditional insurance, City may consider alternative coverage or risk treatment measures through insurance pools or risk retention groups. The City must approve in writing any alternative coverage. g. Workers' compensation insurance policy(s) covering employees employed on the Project shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation providing rights of recovery in favor of the City. h. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for Consultant's insurance. i. Consultant's insurance policies shall each be endorsed to provide that such insurance is primary protection and any self-funded or commercial coverage maintained by City shall not be called upon to contribute to loss recovery. j. In the course of the Agreement, Consultant shall report, in a timely manner, to City's officially designated contract administrator any known loss occurrence which could give rise to a liability claim or lawsuit or which could result in a property loss. k. Consultant's liability shall not be limited to the specified amounts of insurance required herein. I. Upon the request of City, Consultant shall provide complete copies of all insurance policies required by these Agreement documents. Article VII Transfer or Assignment City and Consultant each bind themselves, and their lawful successors and assigns, to this Agreement. Consultant, its lawful successors and assigns, shall not assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without prior written consent of the City. Article VIII Termination of Contract (1) City may terminate this Agreement for its convenience on 30 days' written notice. Either the City or the Consultant for cause may terminate this Agreement if either Party fails substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Revision Date:9/24/2014 Page 4 of 8 commence correction of such nonperformance with 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the correction thereafter (2) If City chooses to terminate this Agreement under Article 8, upon receipt of notice of termination, Consultant shall discontinue services rendered up to the date of such termination and City shall compensate Consultant based upon calculations in Article 2 of this Agreement and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. (3) All reports, whether partial or complete, prepared under this Agreement, including any original drawings or documents, whether furnished by the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, or contractors, or prepared by Consultant, shall be or become the property of the City, and shall be furnished to the City prior to or at the time such services are completed, or upon termination or expiration of this Agreement. Article IX Right to Audit (1) Consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of Consultant involving transactions relating to this Agreement. Consultant agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate workspace in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. City shall give Consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits. (2) Consultant further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder, a provision to the effect that the subcontracting consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under the subcontract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such sub-consultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during normal working hours to all sub- consultant facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article. City shall give Consultant and any sub-consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audit. (3) Consultant and sub-consultants agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the City. The City agrees to reimburse Consultant for the cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed. City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Revision Date 9/24/2014 Page 5 of 8 Article X Minority Business and Small Business Enterprise (MBE)(SBE) Participation In accordance with the City's Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance No. 20020-12-2011, as amended, the City has goals for the participation of minority business enterprises and/or small business enterprises in City contracts. Consultant acknowledges the MBE and SBE goals established for this Agreement and its accepted written commitment to MBE and SBE participation. Any misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent misrepresentation) and/or the commission of fraud by the Consultant may result in the termination of this Agreement and debarment from participating in City contracts for a period of time of not less than three (3) years. Article XI Observe and Comply Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any way affect this Agreement and the work hereunder, and shall observe and comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which may exist or may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be considered. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and all of its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims or liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law, ordinance, or regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees. Article XII Venue and Jurisdiction If any action, whether real or asserted, at law or in equity, arises on the basis of any provision of this Agreement, venue for such action shall lie in state courts located in Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas — Fort Worth Division. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. Article XIII Contract Construction The Parties acknowledge that each party and, if it so chooses, its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party must not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits hereto. City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Revision Date:9/24/2014 Page 6 of 8 Article XIV Severability The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section or other part of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall ever be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or other part of this Agreement to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid or unconstitutional portion had never been contained therein. Article XV Notices Notices to be provided hereunder shall be sufficient if forwarded to the other Party by hand-delivery or via U.S. Postal Service certified mail return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the address of the other Party shown below: City of Fort Worth Attn: Steve Eubanks, PE, CFM Storm Water Management Division 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Consultant: Atkins, North America, Inc. Attn: Ramesh Chintala, P.E., CFM, D.WRE. 18383 Preston Road, Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75252 Article XVI Headings The headings contained herein are for the convenience in reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Revision Date:9/24/2014 Page 7 of 8 Article XVII Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and each counterpart shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. Executed and effective this the / C3/`-day�r�"' , 20/ BY: BY: CITY OF FORT WORTH ENGINEER Atkins North America, Inc. Fernando Costa Matt Baird Assistant City Manager Vice President Date: S/7zs Date: ,T APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: G""j By: LL Li Li Dougla W. Wiersig, Ph.D. P.E r Director, Transportation/Pul5lic Works APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY M&C No.: C-26950 By: M&C Date: September 9. 2014 Douglas W. Black Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: 00 % Vary J. Kaiser,' o� City Secretary 1o° rFCAS City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services OFFICIAL RECORD Revision Date:9/24/2014 Page 8 of 8 CITY SECRETARY FT.WORTN,TX Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 PREFACE In an on-going effort to better serve its citizens, the City of Fort Worth (CITY) has begun the initiative of identifying, quantifying, and mitigating local neighborhood flooding issues. The City of Fort Worth Stormwater Program (PROGRAM) is implementing this assessment through the use of various studies and design projects. Historically these issues have been addressed on a somewhat isolated basis by fixing individual pieces of a system. The purpose of these feasibility studies is to assess these issues in a more holistic fashion. By analyzing the system in its entirety, the City can more efficiently address the cause of flooding. By performing these studies in a methodical and organized manner the City can prioritize areas of potential flooding by severity as well as systematically assess the entire city. The result is a program that the City can rely on to produce functional, constructible projects that provide real and tangible benefits to the citizens of Fort Worth. These studies should be approached as if they were a "preliminary" or "conceptual" design project. It is the intent that these studies will flesh out potential barriers to construction such as utility conflicts, right-of-way requirements, excessive construction cost, and future pending development, to the extent that recommended projects are known to be feasible, affordable, and possible for construction. These studies should stop short of providing the necessary design plans for construction. The proposed solutions provided by these studies will be extracted on a prioritized basis and allocated to appropriate personnel in the Capital Improvement division to become a separate design project. To assist with this effort the City has hired a Program Management Team (PMT). The PMT will act as agents for the City to facilitate related tasks for these studies. Study Area Description: — The study area is located south of IH-30 and north of Meadowbrook Drive, and generally east of Oakland Boulevard and west of Tierney Road in east Fort Worth. The area is dominated by single-family residences, with some open space and commercial properties. A cursory search of the Tarrant Appraisal District data indicates that most homes were built from the 1940s to the 1970s. The study area is primarily serviced by storm drain systems, but an open channel reach (Stream WF-2A) is also located within the study area. The topography can be generally described as gently rolling hills, with a fairly steep open area at the downstream end of the study area along Stream WF-2A. The study area is divided into two (2) separate mapsheds, components of which will be evaluated as distinct systems (see attached study area map): • Fosdic Lake — Storm drain system upstream of Fosdic Lake in Oakland Lake Park. 1 of 14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 • Central Meadowbrook — Combined riverine and storm drain system upstream of a point along Stream WF-2A due north of Briarwood Lane and Tierney Court North. Purpose & Needs: — The purpose of this feasibility study is to identify a total watershed solution to achieve a 100-year storm event level of service, to the extent feasible. Proposed improvements will result in no adverse impacts to the watershed; mitigation efforts may be required to achieve this goal. Proposed improvements will be presented in a manner that is acceptable to the affected community. Objectives: • Assess existing infrastructure to determine deficiencies and identify flood risks. • Provide recommendations to the City to significantly increase the level of service of the drainage system in order to reduce risks and frequency of flooding in the Study Area. Protection of all properties from flooding in the 5-year storm is the primary minimum target. This study will aim to achieve protection from the 100-year storm. • Recommendations shall be affordable, acceptable, and constructible. • Develop project specific alternatives appropriate for study needs, including but not limited to storm drain improvements, culvert crossings, open channel studies, and added storage or conveyance capacity. • Consider and utilize (where determined to be feasible) opportunities to blend features with other initiatives and plans, such as redevelopment, schools, multiuse facilities, etc. • Consider possibility of integrating proposed alternatives with other City CIP or rehabilitation projects from other City departments. • Avoid increases in flood risk elsewhere, including both upstream and downstream systems. • Estimate impacts to water quality resulting from proposed alternatives, in accordance with the City's MS4 permit. • Provide a conceptual design that demonstrates that the proposed plan is feasible, acceptable, and constructible. Planning Level Feasibility Study: The work described in this Scope of Services is a Planning Level exercise. "Planning Level" refers to a level of detail and related work effort specified within this study scope, and is defined as the "level of detail in investigation, analyses, and preliminary design necessary to support the identification of plans and subsequent decisions regarding 2of14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 selection of alternatives and implementation of projects, including communication with the public." Upon implementation, additional detail will be developed to support engineering design and construction. BASIC SERVICES Task 1 - Project Management The ENGINEER's project management activities shall include task leadership and direction, telephone and written communication, bi-monthly study update correspondence/meetings, study status reports, study schedule and updates, and personnel and data management among other general study management activities. Any delays to the study schedule shall be documented in writing to the City of Fort Worth for review and approval. The ENGINEER shall attend the study kickoff meeting with a proposed schedule for task sequence and completion. The ENGINEER's Project Manager shall schedule and lead all study meetings. Meeting notes shall be submitted to the City of Fort Worth's Project Manager within five working days after each meeting. The ENGINEER will provide to the City study information regarding proposed mitigation alternatives (if applicable) for public outreach. The ENGINEER will fully document all relevant hardware, software, file structures, and data formats used during the study, in accordance with Exhibit A-2. Other than intermittent meetings or as required by the City, all of the individual Task deliverables shall be submitted with the draft and final report at the conclusion of the study. The ENGINEER shall update a Study Certification and Decision Log to be submitted at the completion of the study. Task 1 Deliverables: • Documentation o Study Schedule o Support Data — Relevant meeting notes and email correspondence, study status updates, and action items for ENGINEER, sub-consultants, and the City of Fort Worth. o Completed Study Certification and Decision Log upon completion of the study. Task 2: Data Search, Collection, Field Reconnaissance, System Condition Assessment, SITE investigation and Surveys 2.1 Dataset Search and Collection 3of14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 The City of Fort Worth will provide the ENGINEER with the available watershed data in GIS format, in addition to the available models and reports: stream centerlines, street centerlines, 2011 aerial imagery, 2009 TNRIS LiDAR points in LAS format and associated 2009 ESRI terrain surface, 2007 subbasin delineations (may not be delineated for each site), citizen service requests (if available) and zoning maps. Historical rainfall data and the as-built drawings of the hydraulic structures may be available from the City. Any errors identified or revisions made to the base data, watershed boundary, or other datasets shall be reported and discussed with the City's Project Manager. The ENGINEER will review and identify known flooding and drainage issues referred to as "hot spots" within the study area. The City will provide available drainage complaints to the ENGINEER in GIS format. Additional documented "hot spots" shall be compiled into a GIS geodatabase and returned to the City to update their records. The City of Fort Worth's Storm Water Management Division shall assist the ENGINEER in locating required data available from the City, but the ultimate responsibility for identifying data needs and for finding, collecting, developing, analyzing, and creating all necessary data shall reside with the ENGINEER. If required data is unavailable, the ENGINEER shall inform the City in writing and discuss with the City's Project Manager for actions or determination. 2.2 Field Reconnaissance The ENGINEER shall perform field reconnaissance to become familiar with the study area, hydraulic and hydrologic structures, land use, vegetative and land cover, special features and problems within the watershed. Be aware that not all stormwater conveyance features are contained within City easements therefore property owner permission must be obtained by the ENGINEER to access private property. The ENGINEER shall document the reconnaissance findings with labeled digital photographs. The ENGINEER shall document physical characteristics of the watershed relevant to analysis, including but not limited to: specific features of all major detention ponds and outlet discharge structures, vegetative and built structure conditions, types and number of hydraulic structures, structure condition, hydraulic structures, any locations and descriptions of stream cross-sections to be surveyed (including bridge railings and obstructed flow areas), etc. Photos shall be taken of all relevant physical infrastructure observed in the field. 2.3 System Conditions Assessment 4of14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 The ENGINEER will identify critical stormwater features in the study area to be assessed for structural conditions. Pipe features shall be documented with either photographic evidence or CCTV inspection. If available, the ENGINEER may obtain CCTV from a recent previously performed inspection in lieu of performing new inspections. CCTV will be limited to pipes installed more than 60 years ago or pipes with insufficient information to conduct the existing system conditions modeling. Pipes shall be ranked as good, fair, or poor. Inlets and manholes shall also be documented and noted as good, fair, or poor. An exhibit indicating location and age of all features, associated photos or video, and any field notes shall be submitted to the City. NOTE: If debris is encountered, contractor will abandon inspection and await further instruction from the City. Cleaning can be provided at the City's request, at an additional cost. 2.4 Subsurface Utility Engineering Investigation (SUE) ENGINEER will perform a Level B, C or D SUE investigation for select locations in the study area, especially in the vicinity of proposed alternatives. A Level D SUE is defined as: Quality Level D • Conduct appropriate investigations (e.g., owner records, County/CITY records, personal interviews, visual inspections, etc.), to help identify utility owners that may have facilities within the project limits or that may be affected by the project. • Collect applicable records (e.g., utility owner base maps, "as built" or record drawings, permit records, field notes, geographic information system data, oral histories, etc.) on the existence and approximate location of existing involved utilities. • Review records for: evidence or indication of additional available records; duplicate or conflicting information; need for clarification. • Develop SUE plan sheets and transfer information on all involved utilities to appropriate design plan sheets, electronic files, and/or other documents as required. Exercise professional judgment to resolve conflicting information. For information depicted, indicate: utility type and ownership; date of depiction; quality level(s); end points of any utility data, line status (e.g., active, abandoned, out of service); line size and condition; number of jointly buried cables; and encasement. Quality Level C (includes tasks as described for Quality Level D) 5 of 14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 • Identify surface features, from project topographic data and from field observations, that are surface appurtenances of subsurface utilities. • Include survey and correlation of aerial or ground-mounted utility facilities in Quality Level C tasks. • Survey surface features of subsurface utility facilities or systems. • The survey shall also include (in addition to subsurface utility features visible at the ground surface): determination of invert elevations of any manholes and vaults; sketches showing interior dimensions and line connections of such manholes and vaults; any surface markings denoting subsurface utilities, furnished by utility owners for design purposes. • Exercise professional judgment to correlate data from different sources, and to resolve conflicting information. • Update (or prepare) plan sheets, electronic files, and/or other documents to reflect the integration of Quality Level D and Quality Level C information. • Recommend follow-up investigations (e.g., additional surveys, consultation with utility owners, etc.) as may be needed to further resolve discrepancies. • Provide Quality Level C to identify overhead utilities on the project and provide the overhead utility information on the SUE plan sheets. Level B (includes tasks as described for Quality Level C) • Select and apply appropriate surface geophysical method(s) to search for and detect subsurface utilities within the project limits, and/or to trace a particular utility line or system. • Based on an interpretation of data, mark the indications of utilities on the ground surface for subsequent survey. Utilize paint or other method acceptable for marking of lines. • Unless otherwise directed, mark centerline of single-conduit lines, and outside edges of multi-conduit systems. • Resolve differences between designated utilities and utility records and surveyed appurtenances. • Recommend additional measures to resolve differences if they still exist. Recommendations may include additional or different surface geophysical methods, exploratory excavation, or upgrade to Quality Level A data. As an alternative to the physical marking of lines, the ENGINEER may, with CITY's approval, utilize other means of data collection, storage, retrieval, and reduction, that enables the correlation of surface geophysical data to the project's survey control. 6of14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 The purpose of the SUE investigation is to identify potential utility conflicts so that proposed alternatives will either avoid them completely or adequately account for them in the construction cost estimate. 2.5 Field Surveys The ENGINEER will identify critical locations for collecting survey data. After assembling the available elevation data from the City's stormwater infrastructure database and as-built plans, limited field survey will be collected to supplement missing data, verify data from other sources and tie-in the various data sources. Survey data may also be collected for the open channel areas to supplement LiDAR data. Benchmarks shall be located and recorded for survey control. Available elevation reference marks shall be located and recorded at surveyed elements. The ENGINEER shall establish primary and secondary control points for survey. Field surveys of stream cross-sections shall be representative of the natural ground of the channel and overbanks. Surveys of bridges, culvert, dams or other hydraulic structures shall be representative of the hydraulic structure's geometry. A typical ground cross-section shall be surveyed upstream of the structure. Measurements and survey points defining the geometry of the hydraulic structures shall all be recorded in field notes which will be include in the project deliverables. Field survey notes shall represent graphically and clearly, in plan and profile view, what was surveyed, photographed, and recorded. All of the sketches should depict the upstream face of the structure as well as the direction of flow. The ENGINEER shall submit the survey data as text files and in a GIS shapefile format. 2.6 Finished Floor Elevations Survey of finished floor elevations is excluded from this scope of work. Task 2 Deliverables: • Documentation o Data Collection — Summary of Data Collection efforts and methodology including a list of all data collected and sources. o Location map of flooding "hot spots" within the immediate study area.. o Field Reconnaissance — Summary of Field Reconnaissance efforts including: ■ Annotated photo log of study photos ■ Photo exhibit showing approximate location and direction of photos taken in the field. Also identify any special physical characteristics relevant to analysis. ■ Field notes or sketches of observations and measurements taken in the field. 7of14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 o System Conditions Assessment — Exhibit showing the age of critical stormwater features within the project limits. o Quality Level B,C, or D SUE Plan Sheets o Field Surveys — Summary of field survey efforts including datums and benchmarks used, coordinate system used, grid to surface conversion factors. ■ Project Control Exhibit showing location of all control points, benchmarks, and elevation reference marks. ■ Data sheets for benchmarks ■ Overall survey exhibit showing locations of all surveyed elements. Digital Data o Data Collection — Data collected from the City and other sources for the study. o Field Reconnaissance — Labeled digital photos o Field Surveys ■ Text Files: Survey text files in ASCII format of primary control points, secondary control points, elevation reference marks, surveyed hydraulic structures and stream cross-sections. ■ Field Notes: Field notes in PDF format of surveyed hydraulic structures and stream cross-sections. ■ GIS Files: Shapefiles of survey data of primary control points, benchmarks, elevation reference marks, and topo survey shots. ■ CAD files with all survey points o System Conditions Assessment — Updated geodatabase of existing stormwater infrastructure that includes install dates. o One set of CD/DVDs containing electronic versions of all information (intermediate and final data and photos) gathered in this Task. Task 3: Existing System Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis The ENGINEER shall perform hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the drainage system in the study area. The hydrologic analysis shall include quantification of runoff rates for both existing land use conditions as well as proposed developed land use conditions where applicable. The hydrologic analysis shall be based on the City of Fort Worth iSWM Criteria Manual for Site Development and Construction, August 2012, and rainfall depths provided in Table 5.15 of the iSWM Hydrology Technical Manual, April 2010. The hydraulic analysis shall be performed on the existing drainage system using methods consistent with the City of Fort Worth iSWM Criteria Manual for Site Development and Construction, August 2012. These analyses shall be performed for 8of14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year storm events. More detail describing the methods, tools, parameters, etc. to be used for this study described below. Hydraulic analysis of the existing and proposed storm drain systems will be accomplished using the XP-SWMM software or other modeling program acceptable to the City. Outfall channel tailwater is not expected to have a significant impact on the storm drain capacity. Existing system condition calculations will focus on identifying conduit capacity limitations, not inlet-level capacity calculations. A description of the anticipated modeling efforts for each system is presented below: 3.1 Fosdic Lake System Drainage infrastructure in the Fosdic Lake System consists solely of storm drains. The ENGINEER assumes no previous model exists for this system. The ENGINEER will first define the hydrologic parameters to apply the SCS method (subbasin areas, land use values and time of concentration) for the study area. The existing hydraulic network will be assembled for input to XP-SWMM or similar City approved modeling program from the data available in the City's database of drainage infrastructure, systems condition assessment data, SUE assessment, survey data and field reconnaissance. Using the available 2009 topographic data, the ENGINEER will cut a cross section of the receiving channel immediately downstream of the storm sewer system. The tailwater for the storm sewer system will be based on a normal depth calculation at this location. The ENGINEER assumes that this system can be modeled with approximately 35 subbasins. 3.2 Central Meadowbrook System The Central Meadowbrook System is divided into three (3) portions consisting of an open channel and two storm drain systems. The open channel is located parallel to and east of Watson Street. The two storm drain systems outfall to Stream WF-2A at Barnett Street and at the intersection of Shilling Drive and Kemble Street. The ENGINEER assumes no previous model exists for this system. The ENGINEER will first define the hydrologic parameters to apply the SCS method (subbasin areas, land use values and time of concentration) for the study area. The existing hydraulic network (including the open channel portion) will be assembled in XP- SWMM or similar City approved modeling program from the data available in the City's database of drainage infrastructure, pipe system conditions assessment, SUE assessment, 2009 topographic data, survey data and field reconnaissance. Using the available 2009 topographic data, the ENGINEER will cut a cross section of the receiving 9of14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 channel immediately downstream of the two storm drain systems. The tailwater for the two storm drain systems will be based on normal depth calculations at these locations. The ENGINEER assumes that the storm drain system can be modeled with 40 subbasins. Task 3 Deliverables: • Written summary of existing drainage system analysis, including methods, parameter selections, analysis tools used, other associated calculations, system capacity (Level of Service), analysis results and conclusions • Exhibits showing the location of existing infrastructure • Exhibits showing the assumed hydrologic parameters used to develop the model • Tables showing results from the analysis for all storm events • Final GIS data developed as part of this analysis • Digital copies of project models or spreadsheet calculations Task 4: Flood Hazard Identification Based on the results of Task 3 and/or in response to known or observed flooding, the ENGINEER shall identify and document flood hazards within the systems evaluated. ENGINEER shall provide a written summary describing the flooding. This assessment should, at a minimum consider the following: • Number, location, and type (residential, commercial, institutional, etc.) of structures with significant risk of flooding • Severity of flooding • Frequency of flooding • Cause/Source of flooding • Level of Service/Level of Protection provided by the drainage system Task 4 Deliverables: • Documentation o Written summary of identified flood hazards and associated characteristics o Overall study area flood hazard map o Additional detailed exhibits as needed Task 5: Alternative Analysis and Mitigation Strategies 10 of 14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 The ENGINEER will evaluate multiple alternative solutions to reduce the risk of flooding and identify potential mitigation strategies within the systems evaluated to meet the objectives of the study. The ENGINEER will identify potential mitigation strategies in areas that have the most straightforward implementation. The ENGINEER will screen the evaluated alternatives and will recommend to the City only alternatives that are feasible for construction. This plan may involve acquisition of property options. Performance of this task shall include: • ENGINEER shall evaluate potential improvements to the drainage system sufficient to meet current City of Fort Worth design criteria. In the event that a complete solution is determined to be not feasible then the ENGINEER will evaluate solutions that provide an improved level of service/level of protection greater than the performance of the existing system. • Planning Level Layout Plans — ENGINEER will produce conceptual layouts of the concepts proposed in Task 5. Concepts will be for the mitigation strategies as described in the objective of the study. • Planning Level Cost Estimates — ENGINEER will identify planning level cost estimates based upon the conceptual layout plans. The cost estimates should focus on the major cost items, including property acquisition, utility relocation, all associated appurtenances, etc. The cost estimates shall have appropriate contingencies as a conceptual, planning level exercise. • Screening of Concepts — ENGINEER will perform an initial feasibility assessment of each concept. This assessment shall be based upon the estimated cost, potential benefit, and constructability. The consultant will present this assessment to City/PMT to jointly decide on the elimination of certain concepts. The ENGINEER will refine, revise, and potentially add concepts based upon the work session with City staff. • If all concepts are eliminated, the study will be concluded at this point. Similar to the existing conditions evaluation, the alternative analysis will be divided into two distinct analyses, one for the Fosdic Lake system and the other for the Central Meadowbrook system. Proposed solutions in the Fosdic Lake system will consider upstream detention and/or storm drain pipe improvements. Planning level opinion of probable cost will be prepared. Proposed solutions for the Central Meadowbrook system will consider a storm drain system in Watson Street (to account for the potential for future development 11 of 14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 in the vacant lots adjacent to Watson Street). Solutions will consider increasing pipe sizes, adding relief lines and detention storage, in general. The ENGINEER intends to provide a 100-year level of service for the proposed improvements. However, if initial constructability evaluations indicate that level of service is not feasible, the target level of service may be adjusted. The ENGINEER will compare the proposed peak runoff rates with the existing rates to determine if mitigation is needed; however, the ENGINEER anticipates that any increase in peak flow rates can be handled by the downstream receiving channels based on the significant depth and steep channel slope of the streams. Task 5 Deliverables: • Written summary of alternatives and mitigation strategies evaluated, including list of affected properties. • Written summary of feasibility of alternatives and documented decisions points leading to the elimination or recommendation of particular alternatives. • Rough conceptual layout plans: o Concept plans should include affected properties (data), mitigation strategy features, with post project inundation mapping or other model results. • Planning level Opinion of Probable Costs: • Presentation of Alternatives — Exhibits depicting the conceptual layout, location, and integration with existing infrastructure will be provided. At a minimum exhibits provided will include: o Overall map o Individual alternatives Task 6: Constructability Review The ENGINEER will perform a constructability review of each recommended mitigation strategy. This review shall identify and assess implementation risks associated with each alternative concept. The ENGINEER will consider cost and funding, coordination with other agencies, coordination with other City construction projects, construction disruption, right-of-way acquisition, community acceptance, utilities, and other items necessary to consider implementation risk. If necessary, the ENGINEER will identify areas of additional study required to mitigate uncertainty. The ENGINEER shall coordinate a constructability review meeting with the City, PMT, and other affected City 12 of 14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 departments (i.e. Streets, Water, Parks, etc.). The ENGINEER will make revisions to the selected alternatives based on City/PMT input from this meeting. At the conclusion of the constructability review, Atkins will develop a recommended plan for the two (2) systems. These recommended plans will be based on the feedback gathered from the City and a public meeting, if available, along with engineering judgment, from the various alternatives presented for consideration. The recommended plans will represent the most advantageous and feasible options for the City to pursue as related to phasing, construction costs, benefits and constructability. A cost estimate and phasing plan will be prepared for the recommended plans. Task 6 Deliverables: • Written summary of items discussed and decisions made in the review meeting • Planning level estimate of construction schedule and phasing plan • Planning level opinion of probable costs for the recommended plan Task 7: Water Quality Assessment The ENGINEER shall perform an initial assessment of water quality impacts of any proposed improvements. This must be included as it is required to comply with the City's MS4 and NPDES permits. The general direction given by the MS4 permit is that all new flood control projects (storm drain systems included) must provide erosion prevention and pollutant removal capabilities. Retrofitting of existing system infrastructure may be proposed if practicable. This assessment is not intended to be a full design of water quality features. This assessment is intended to directly answer a few key questions for the City and to provide a concept of potential water quality improvement features or Best Management Practices (BMPs) that could be installed at a later date. Task 7 Deliverables: • Written summary describing potential BMPs or other features that may improve or mitigate water quality in the study area. • Written summary directly answering the City's water quality questionnaire (to be provided at a later date). • Exhibits indicating location and type of features to be implemented. Task 8: Public Outreach/Involvement Public outreach support is excluded from this scope of work. Task 9: Final Report 13 of 14 Attachment "A" Scope of Services for Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study SWS-058 The ENGINEER shall prepare a preliminary report (75% submittal) to include Tasks 1 through 4 and final report (95% submittal including Tasks 1 through 10) summarizing all work performed in this study including all data collected, all data sources used, all methods used for hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, all results and findings of analysis of existing systems, all results and findings of analysis of proposed alternatives, citizen input from public meetings, feasibility determinations, constructability determinations, and any other relevant information pertaining to the work performed or final recommended improvements. The 95% submittal will address the City and PMT review comments from the 75% submittal. The report will follow the format outlined in Exhibit A-1. A draft of the final report (95% submittal) will be prepared for review by the City and PMT. Upon addressing all comments, a final draft will be submitted. Task 9 Deliverables: • Final Report —4 copies o Written Report o All necessary exhibits o All necessary tables o All associated appendices • Digital data, including final models (CD or DVD) Task 10: Quality Assurance and Quality Control (Qa/Qc) The ENGINEER shall implement Qa/Qc procedures, at a minimum, at the completion of each task in this scope. The Qa/Qc shall be performed by experts knowledgeable in the subject field of the item being reviewed. The Qa/Qc reviews will check for things like missing data, quality of survey data, review of project models and/or calculations for appropriate application and mistakes, review of cost estimates, public outreach strategies, water quality strategies, review of report and exhibits, etc. No work product will be delivered to the City without review by a senior staff member. Task 10 Deliverables: • Written Qa/Qc plan and any available checklists in an appendix to the report at all milestone submittals Copies of signed documents as required by Qa/Qc plan 14 of 14 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items ore to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D. Please see Digitol5ubmittol Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D *Only tables listing the information collected ore required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 1.0 TASK 1-Project Management Report Narrative 1.1 Executive Summary Please include relevant information summarizing the tasks.Also include a description of study area and any special considerations or characteristics.Major findings,anything of significance,unique,or how the modeling was handled should be included. 1.2 Summary of Tasks 1.3 Project Certification and Decision Log Please include a summary of key decisions that were made.Also list any public meetings dates and brief description.This log should not include every conversation or email relating to the project.A more complete log may be included in Appendix B if the consultant feels it is appropriate. 1.4 Public Meeting Discussion(if applicable) Please include a brief summary of any public meetings or forums held relating to the study.Include data,location,what information was presented,what information was gathered,etc. Report Norrotive Tables Additional Tables At the consultants discretion to provide tables in the narrative providing relevant information.Information regarding public meetings,etc.may be included.Large or lengthy tables should be included in Appendix B. Appendix A-Figures 1.1 Overall Study Area Map 11"x17"Map of the Project Area 1.2 Public Meeting Map(if applicable) 11"x17"Map of the information gathered at public forums. 1 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items are to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D. Please see Digital Submittal Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D *Only tables listing the information collected are required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 2.0 TASK 2-Data Collection,Field Reconnaissance,Drainage System Condition Assessment,Survey Report Narrative 2.1 Data Search and Collection Provide a summary of the efforts and methodology including discussion of data sources and data collected such as spatial information,drainage complaint data,and any available LOMC information. 2.2 Field Reconnaissance Provide a summary of efforts and methodology 2.3 Drainage System Condition Assessment Provide a summary of efforts and methodology,as well as specific information regarding and CCN data the condition of the storm drains using the"fair,poor,good"scale.In addition,identify any areas of concern or where there may be imminent failure.Figure 2.2 should show the condition graphically. CCN format shall follow the city's standard format. 2.4 Subsurface Utility Investigation(Level D) Provide a summary of findings from the SUE level D investigation. 2.5 Field Surveys Summary of efforts and methodology including discussion of survey guidelines,control, locations,finished floors,etc. 2.6 Finished Flood Elevations Provide a summary of the number of finished floor elevations surveyed as well as a determination for the need of the survey. Report Narrative Tables General Table of Data Collected* Include date,source,and any other relevant information Additional Tables At the consultants'discretion to provide tables in the narrative providing relevant information,such as a table of finished floor elevations.Please avoid adding very large or lengthy tables in the Narrative and use Appendix B instead. Appendix A-Figures 2.1 Drainage Complaints/Hot-Spots 11"x17"Map of the drainage complaint locations.Include a short(3-4 word)description of the complaint.Include table of complaints on the map. 2.2 Storm Drain Condition Assessment 11"x17"Map of the storm drain conditions.Include shapefile of storm drain condition rating using good,fair,poor,Identify locations and directionality of all photos taken and include selected photos on the Figure.The GIS shapefiles for Storm Drain Condition and Photo Location/Direction should be provided in Appendix D. 2.3 Labeled Photos of Storm Drain Condition Include a photo report(4 photos/page)of the storm drain condition assessment.Focus on fair/poor conditions 2.4 Figure of Survey Locations 11"x17'Map of the drainage system layout.Clearly identify the links,nodes and junctions, include finished floor elevations surveyed Appendix B-Supporting Documentation B2.1 Drainage Complaints Table* Include case number,location,other relevant information B2.2 Field Observation Report B2.3 List of As-Built Plans Used* Include plan name,plan number,date,and sheets used.Actual As-Built plans are not required either in hard copy or digitally. B2.4 LOMC Information* Include date and case number B2.5 Surveyed Inlets Include name,location,type(curb inlet,manhole,etc.),size,material,slope,elevations of outfalls,pipes, and additional relevant information B2.6 Finished Flood Elevations* Include address,finished floor elevation,and lowest adjacent grade elevation 2 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items are to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D.Please see Digital Submittal Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D •Only tables listing the information collected are required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 3.0 TASK 3—Existing System Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis 3.1 1 Hydrologic Analysis Report Narrative 3.1.1 Task Summary Provide a summary of the efforts and methodology including general description of the area and conditions and discussion of the data sources used. 3.1.2 Methodology Provide a detailed discussion of the analysis methodology including information regarding the data used,basin delineation and loss parameter development,rainfall,routing methods and calculation process,and model construction.Include any unique situations such as detention or diversions.Discuss changes in parameters(%Imp,Tc)for future conditions if applicable. 3.1.3 Results and Conclusions Provide a discussion of the modeling results and a comparison to previous modeling results.Compare to Effective FIS if applicable. Report Narrative Tables Rainfall Data Include source,times,depths,etc Additional Tables At the consultants discretion to provide tables in the narrative providing relevant information.Information regarding basin parameters,land use information,routing information and results may be included in the narrative,but please avoid adding very large or lengthy tables in the narrative and use Appendix B instead. Appendix A-Figures 3.1.1 Drainage Area Map 22"x34"Map of the Drainage Areas,Junctions,Reaches,etc.Include streets,contours, storm drain,and aerial imagery 3.1.2 Hydrologic Soil Groups 11"x17"Map of the HSG's.Include HSG classifications and common names of individual types.Also include drainage area boundaries and aerial imagery. 3.1.3 Existing Percent Impervious(Land 11"x17"Map of the existing conditions land use/zoning used for the development of Use/Zoning) percent impervious values.If another method was used to determine percent impervious, include documentation in the narrative. 3.1.4 Future Percent Impervious(Land 11"x17"Map of the future conditions(if applicable)land use/zoning used for the Use/Zoning) development of percent impervious values.If another method was used to determine percent impervious,include documentation in the narrative. 3.1.5 Longest Flow Path and Time of 11"x17"Map showing longest flow paths for each basin.Distinguish between overland, Concentration sheet flow,gutter flow,pipe flow and channelized flow.Include a table with the times of concentration and lag times on it.If lag times differ for future conditions,provide an additional map with the adjusted flow paths. Appendix B-Supporting Documentation B3.1.1 Land Use Classification Table Include assumptions made about associated impervious cover percentages 83.1.2 Curve Number Calculations Tabular format used for curve number calculations.If computations are done using GIS, provide some tabular information. 83.1.3 Lag time Calculations Include computations for overland,shallow concentrated and channelized flow as shown in Figure 3.5.Please note that flow in the gutter is to be considered channelized and calculated accordingly. 83.1.4 Table of Routing Parameters If routing methods are used,provide detailed information. 83.1.5 Table of Pond Curves or other Paired If Applicable-Provide paired data information for existing and/or proposed detention Data ponds,diversions,or other hydrologic information 83.1.6 Summary Table of Basin Parameters Include Basin Name,Area(ac)(sq mi),CN,%Impervious,TC,Lag Time,and any other pertinent information B3.1.7 I Summary Table of Results I Include Element Name(Basin,Junction,etc.),Area,and Peak Discharge for the studied 3 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items are to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D. Please see Digital Submittal Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D *Only tables listing the information collected are required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) rainfall events Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 3.0 TASK 3—Existing System Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis 3.2 Hydraulic Analysis Report Narrative [T3.2.2Methodology ummary Provide a summary of the efforts and methodology including general description of the storm drain system and discussion,data sources used,and expected results. Provide a detailed discussion of the analysis methodology including hydraulic parameters, boundary conditions,flow change locations,and special situations such diversions or split flow.If any specialized modeling(such as XPSWMM or InfoWorks)is used,please provide a detailed accounting of that process in a separate section. 3.2.3 Results and Conclusions Provide a discussion of the modeling results,comparison to previous modeling results, and any conclusions. Report Narrative Tables Summary Tailwater Elevations Include node ID,description of location,and tailwater elevation information for selected profiles.Limit the table in the narrative to a few key locations.More comprehensive tables should be included in Appendix B. Loss Coefficients Include Link or Node ID and coefficient at key locations.More detailed tables can be provided in Appendix B. Level of Service Comparison Include location description,Link or Node ID for both models(comparison),and HGL and EGL for selected profiles.Level of service will be assigned as follows:less than 5-year, greater than 5-year and less than 100-year,and greater than 100-year. More detailed tables can be provided in Appendix B. Additional Tables At the consultants discretion to provide tables in the narrative providing relevant information.Information regarding Manning's roughness values,etc.may be included in the narrative,but please avoid adding very large or lengthy tables in the narrative and use Appendix B instead. Appendix A-Figures 3.2.1 Profiles for ALL studied events If applicable,include profiles for all studied events,including the 100-yr future condition. A separate figure is NOT required for each event. Additional Figures for Advanced Analysis Include Figures detailing relevant information such as location of analysis,nodes,links,2D (if applicable) zones,inundation mapping,etc. Appendix 8-Supporting Documentation B3.2.1 Table of Loss Coefficients Include Link or Node ID and coefficient where minor losses may occur from size changes, bends,and junctions 133.2.2 Table of Summary Tailwater Elevations Include Node ID and elevations for studied profiles.Original model outputs may be provided in Appendix D. B3.2.3 Table of Level of Service Include Link or Node ID for both models(comparison),HGL and EGL for selected profiles, and level of service assigned as follows:less than 5-year,greater than 5-year and less than 100-year,and greater than 100-year. 83.2.4 Additional Tables for Advanced Analysis Include information regarding parameter development,node and link results,2D results, (if applicable) etc.for advanced modeling 4 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items are to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D. Please see Digital Submittal Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D *Only tables listing the information collected ore required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 4.0 TASK 4-Flood Hazard Identification Report Narrative 4.1 Task Summary Provide a summary of the efforts and methodology including general discussion of the findings of Task 3 analyses. 4.2 Flood Hazard Identification Provide a detailed discussion of the findings including number of structures at-risk (added/removed),number of structures flooded,and level of service.Lead into Alternatives Analysis. Report Narrative Tables Level of Service at Roadway Crossings Table showing road name,crossing configuration,level of service,etc.All depths(above and below structures)should be given by return event.Give depths below structures as negative depths and above structures as positive depths. Additional Tables At the consultants discretion to provide tables in the narrative providing relevant information.Information regarding LOS,finished floors,etc.may be included.Large or lengthy tables should be included in Appendix B. Appendix A-Figures 4.1 Flood Hazard/Level of Service Map 11"x17"Map showing flooding and/or flooded structures and crossings.Indicate frequency of the flooding at various crossings. Appendix B-Supporting Documentation B4.1 Level of Service at Roadway Crossings Provide a detailed discussion of the findings including number of structures at-risk (added/removed),number of structures flooded,and level of service.Lead into Alternatives Analysis. Tasks 1 through 4 should be included in 1st submittal for review, considered as 75%submittal. 5 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items ore to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D.Please see Digital Submittal Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D •Only tables listing the information collected are required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 5.0 TASK 5—Alternative Analysis and Mitigation Strategies Report Narrative 5.1 Task Summary Provide a summary of the efforts and methodology including general description of the improvement alternatives to be evaluated. 5.2 Methodology Provide a detailed discussion of the analysis methodology including what solutions were used to address what flooding issues.Provide specific information about each improvement including the nature(pipes,detention,etc.),size,configuration.Discuss solutions that provide 100-year protection as well as those that may provide a lower level of protection but have a reduced cost.Provide discussion of damage calculations,both quantitative(BCA)and qualitative(emergency access,vehicular traffic,etc.) 5.3 Results and Conclusions Provide a discussion of the proposed alternative(s)performance,including specifics such as structures removed from flooding,road crossings improved,etc.Provide OPC information and recommendations for potential CIP projects. Report Narrative Tables Comparison Flow Table Provide a tabular comparison of the existing and proposed discharges and the difference at selected locations.More detailed tables should be provided in Appendix B. Comparison HGL/EGL Table Provide a tabular comparison of the existing and proposed HGL and EGL,and the difference at selected locations.More detailed tables should be provided in Appendix B as listed below. Preliminary Impact Analysis Provide a tabular comparison of the preliminary impact analysis on potential downstream impacts on receiving waterways for the 2-,10-and 100-year events.More detailed tables should be provided in Appendix B as listed below. Planning Level Cost Estimates Provide a tabular comparison of cost estimates focused on the major cost items,including property acquisition,utility relocation,all associated appurtenances,etc.The cost estimates shall include a line item for contingencies.Provide detailed table in Appendix B. Additional Tables At the consultants discretion to provide tables in the narrative providing relevant information.Information regarding estimated damages,roadway crossings,proposed alternative costs,etc.may be included but please avoid adding very large or lengthy tables in the narrative and use Appendix B instead. Appendix A-Figures 5.1 Overall Improvement Alternatives 11"x17"Map showing location and identifying the nature of the proposed improvements that were evaluated.22"x34"is permissible if the Engineer deems it necessary to convey the information clearly. 5.2-5.X Planning Level Layout Plans 11"x17"layout plans of the conceptual alternatives.22"x34"is permissible if the Engineer deems it necessary to convey the information clearly. Appendix B-Supporting Documentation B5.1 Comparison Flow Table Provide a tabular comparison of the existing and proposed discharges and the difference at all locations. 135.2 Comparison HGL/EGL Table Provide a tabular comparison of the existing and proposed HGL and EGL,and the difference for the entire system. B5.3 Preliminary Impact Analysis Provide a tabular comparison of the preliminary impact analysis on potential downstream impacts on receiving waterways for the 2-,10-and 100-year events.More detailed tables should be provided in Appendix B as listed below. B5.4 Depth-Damage Calculations Include tabular calculations used to determine estimated damages for each studied rainfall event. B5.5.x Opinions of Probable Cost Provide a detailed Opinion of Probable Cost for each improvement alternative evaluated. 6 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items are to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D.Please see Digital Submittal Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D *Only tables listing the information collected are required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 6.0 TASK 6—Constructability Review Report Narrative 6.1 Task Summary Provide a summary of the efforts and methodology including general discussion of the findings of the analyses. 6.2 Construction Schedule Provide a planning level estimate of construction schedule and note features that may cause significant impact to the schedule such as permits or franchise utilities. Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 7.0 TASK 7—Water Quality Assessment Repart Narrative 7.1 Task Summary Provide a summary of the efforts and methodology including general discussion of the findings of the analyses. Describe potential BMP's or other features. 7.2 Questionnaire If applicable,provide written summary directly answering water quality questionnaire(to be provided,if applicable). Appendix A-Figures 7.1 Location&Type of BMP 11"x17"Map showing location and identifying the type of BMP's evaluated. Item or Section Item or Section Name Item or Section Description No. 8.0 TASK 8—Public Outreach Report Narrative 8.1 Task Summary Provide a summary of any public outreach efforts. Describe any supporting materials or documents developed as part of this task. Appendix 8-Supporting Documentation B8.1 Completed Public Outreach Worksheet Provide completed worksheet and supporting documentation. 7 Exhibit "A-1" DRAINAGE STUDY SUBMITTAL LIST Note:All listed items are to be included in hard copy and digital format in Appendix D. Please see Digital Submittal Format. Note:All Figures and Tables should be provided in.pdf format. Tables should also be provided in.xlsx format in Appendix D .Only tables listing the information collected are required here.Actual data is to be included in digital form only(Appendix D) Item or Item or Section Name Item or Section Description Section No. 10.0 TASK 10-Quality Assurance Quality Control Report Narrative 10.1 Quality Assurance Quality Control Provide a summary of the internal QA/QC measures as well as the QA/QC provided by Procedures the City and Program Manager. Appendix C-Quality Assurance/Quality Control C10.1 Data Collection,Survey,Field Include QA/QC Documentation for Data Collection and Survey Reconnaissance C10.2 Hydrologic Analysis Include QA/QC Documentation for Hydrologic Analysis C10.3 Hydraulic Analysis and Drainage System Include QA/QC Documentation for Hydraulic Analysis and Drainage System Mapping Mapping C10.4 Proposed Flood Mitigation Alternatives I Include QA/QC Documentation for Proposed Flood Mitigation Alternative Analysis 2nd submittal (90%) should include all Tasks (1-10) including comments addressed from 15L submittal review. 8 ( k \ 0 / ( � / \o cu - e $ & f \ 2 E & 6 m t 7 m u t \ = m § / o E E o E E e 7 7 @ @ 1 922 \ % \ ƒ � u Q) $ \ V � E 7 ) UCL \ � @ E # 2 \ %k / \ 2 / § @ E \ S c 1 0 § / m % o t0 m w / 0. 7 - 2 t 2 E ` E E o k & { m = 41 @ @ @ m § d 2 2 E § k w � & § © 2 \ $ a • / CL C _ f k u § i E ( w E E E CX CC ■ w = a � e 41 2 -0 - E _ _ w 0 G & \ f § f — m / " � @ e (D p o m £ § E o § 7 0 2 a a 2 a i / a a \ m § v k OA kiz / k E k k [ Ln M - # E # E m o m \ k -0 ./ g o o $ [ o W o ' o w w - [ R _ e = o CU _ / w a) -0 2 = a . @ « ( a � ( � � � � � � Z � & Q 7 w 2 % v o I 2 2 2 9 _ \ § A 2 - u C E a R 2 = a a cCL \ 2 OA m z @ % m 3 7 § @ c I k q . ° cc M § § / 2 2 0 � k = a { > k k m k m � e t E w § u V) u u M m 2 u o o = a r e 7 7 2 u . § ° _ ? § ƒ ' % f 0 m m © 0 m \ k k m / m � s $ \ $ � _ $ V) = o a : f = - c = = s I c = C 3 e ® a 2 E o ° I o = o u A = o b o 2 5 § _ E c _ o c 5 5 \ \ ■ o I I ° ° o I = ° � $ o c u 0 w w m I m I c k § I , @ . S v m 2 [ 2 & e & g . m . M m k a « — o m _ � = o m 'a o ± o / � z x ® ® 2 / z C E \ = c m — $ # f : 0 o E — ° 3 c = $ � = o @ = o 5 £ c c c c k \ g $ £ M k m@ : $ x ° e o V) V) _ = 8 e m _ Lu _ _ ui 0 _ e e = M: Lu I C O u N N p H o E cucu n a) x x E al O H VI JI kn p a) n,�I aU+ U fo L fo d U 7 H a m ti a m a pp,pp,,pp,pp,pp,pp,pp, u C a) o �. E u n vi 3 WWLYWWLYW 0 � — ` u G O �+ k 9� ��7f'f� ® � [i 19I3 �c7 aYi , 1O >- p sn t wo 0 Ila B m U L# fJ 1 0 O a) 0 T 31 O In + l7 0 .c .c a E y pO c �. a) m a) a) a) N D ar > O d 11 C C L ; ° C p 0 a) E Q a 7 v v 0 m n 2 E EL c co u ¢ a v CLCL E 3 a u v C au ++ p a ° -I $ E �' E Y 3 v 5 a'a � o v) n ,r O y '� o c to c 3 E t o a°'i ° c •0 4° c co c0 a) E 'M �r N y o 1. p. 1 co co N' fo C c v U + ' Vpvdi E O N OO '6O ++ O 00 w00 a) O N "' X U N 7 j. fo C t0 IX3 ~ , vi p� a) 0 m C O L m a) y rCo ar �' �^ N O d C Y C } n O U123 ro O O n vo CL x O H Y E C C O >` 'ifo a) a) CL Oi vi p n a) y O OO a) lJ i+ cv cv w E Q) y 0 = L u w rn E a E C p c c ro m ° np d m m c a +� ao X O v v E o vi c E o H r-I Ovi opo u •0 O ° Q r�o o CL K ° rco c oa'i d n Y E ro co a, �° T o a m O u n p ° ° ° v a, L C c :� :� co ro O v a ¢ -°a U N ` c O a) vco m Z nnu � c 4 ° v c N o c ' ° > a, c •c >„ o u O v, ¢ � v u .°: m u a c '0 cn 3 vui vU+ W n a, +� o c 0 ° c > �° a E o o c o Q w L a, a, Y c c m O Z ¢ CL r— c Q Q) L s C C W > L +�-' L to vi O k cu +' o CL o ' m u 3 3 L L o ° O x a 3 o E CL ° '^ 0a �� O OO 0 aj 0CIL aE N a - o . E c n u ° -x°o a, 4 L � as a 1� N C �+ m C .0 O c`o a) -0 OvcCo UDO mC N +c+ =icL d0 ++ H O L L = Lp. y � (n Ipm _0 CL X a) p M .0 -0 'O 0 0 0 0 v co a) > > > o ow0E c u vu m a L 0 v I=- O C v aZ a N c c c30U- U CL CL a v c Z u u vi LLLu m d d >- ¢ E E v p ,,, u .1 f c 4r a O -° N '^ d '> N O c 61 x v of ¢ co '� C co - 0 -p p O) C :_ ¢ m p o= c ,� aJ +, 3 > C O sal 0: L u i X a n E Ln c U o v E cCL M F3 0 u aci n axi a) E ° v m 0 Q. t �Q d �° a cno UI o coo o -°a c °' c o •0 o v �, v n cs ro -0 ° 12 E UI E a> a -0 o E ° o m m .� O v a co a) E o -° ro jp pop C co C ro C G Lv) p m m > > 2 2 NO n u O ,� V O L c0 m D to cn .--II NI E G 0 'O L a) a) N v c cm — O 9 r0 �) '' I I I I I I O ro p d 0 �' d O , d a+ co V' N N N N M M Vl a) 7 4, > '> w a . 00 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O L O N a o ga o 3 n u n co - Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q > > .r L L o 0 t v► O w0 OOQQ � � � 1- � � H � xx O cn � a a` ui ;; o n Q 'n mu D l7 Z x o x 0 +' x n X Q Q a v v a v m z 3 c ° v ° v a, O d ami w a � 0. 0 0.CL CL a '_^ ° C coo G 2 C 4 S Q S � Q Q C7 2 a H In ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study City Project No. SWS-058 Lump Sum Project I. Compensation A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated a total lump sum fee of $215,000.00 as summarized in Exhibit B-1 — Engineer Invoice and Section IV— Summary of Total Project Fees. The total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment A, including all labor materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to deliver the services. B. The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Section II - Method of Payment. II. Method of Payment A. Partial payment shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon City's approval of an invoice prepared and submitted by the ENGINEER in the format and including content as presented in Exhibit B-1, Progress Reports as required in item III. of this Attachment B, and Schedule as required in Attachment D to this Agreement. B. The estimated current physical percent complete as required on the invoice shall be calculated from the progress schedule as required in Attachment D to this Standard Agreement and according to the current version of the City of Fort Worth's Schedule Guidance Document. C. The cumulative sum of such monthly partial fee payments shall not exceed the total current project budget including all approved Amendments. D. Each invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this Agreement by an officer of the ENGINEER. III. Progress Reports A. The ENGINEER shall prepare and submit to the designated representative of the Stormwater Department monthly progress reports and schedules in the format required by the City. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date:8.09.2012 Page 1 of 3 B-1 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION IV. Summary of Total Project Fees Firm Primary Responsibility Fee Amount % Prime Consultant Atkins H&H, Concept Design, Report $172,000 80.00% Proposed MBE/SBE Sub-Consultants Schrickel, Rollins & SUE, GIS, Cost Estimating & $33,000 15.4% Associates, Inc. Support DFW Infrastructure CCTV Pipe Condition $5,000 2.3% Assessment Gorrondona & Survey or Stormwater $5,000 2.3% Associates, Inc. Infrastructure Non-MBE/SBE Consultants TOTAL $ 215,000 100% Project Number & Name Total Fee MBE/SBE Fee MBE/SBE (SWS-058) Central Meadowbrook $215,000 $43,000 20% Neighborhood Drainage Stud City MBE/SBE Goal = 20% Consultant Committed Goal = 20 % City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date:8.09.2012 Page 2 of 3 B-2 EXHIBIT "B-1" ENGINEER INVOICE (Supplement to Attachment B) Professional Services Pa nt Request Summary Ux:R Project: (.entree Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainagle Study UNLOCK city Project tt: SWS-0Sa City See Number: I C—.k d tnsbededos: Fi w tem ods wdudiq rwa lare6a,Fns and To Oab and ure ieaieded oivislreab. Company Name: ate/M1Atrrra.Inc. !fossa y—b--neoagdb..ae.and dose.want aremw and lir I—or.aem to w. cdr.eave"dermw:n.}aro raid. Consukanrs Pa: Pam.tlr CL'.Wa email: wall Vendor 1ltvoice 1: Offiee Address. Paymern Request R: Telephone: mom From Date: Fax: To Date: Invoice Date: Ratak Address:la3pP.*uee RaA Sege ML DWIsL T.af 75M Agreement Agreement: Amendment Amount to Completed Percent (S)Invoiced Current Remaining Shoot FAC and Work Type Description Amount Amount Date Amount Completed Previously Invoice Balance ark 7 1Dranaot S 5215,000 DD 15.wo m.m i215.O ori T 7 alT � dei Type� oro T S eax T i Totals This Payment Request 12ls tan m t2tR tan m Overall Percentage Complete: City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date:8.09.2012 Page 3 of 3 B-3 ATTACHMENT "C" CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study City Project No. SWS-058 <No changes to Standard Agreement> City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment C PMO Release Date:05.19.2010 Page I of 1 L a CL L m Q) Q) tD � c LL 0 ' 1 N u rl i a"i a p � > o z Z. Z. u m m O E E N c' Ln C mo c > > o = v v Q m m m c ami o vi ii p a 3 C 7 m L 00 m Ln ♦ • LU 3 D v LL VI M 01 C C e-1 = O }p N , O m Vt O pT n Ln °' E C b 3 Ln N Ln Ln Ln Ln tD tD Ln m ,'n m O w w � .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Ln .1 Ln � � � � .1 c oOC Op a � r-4 4 r-4 rn a Q z .1 00 O . v u u u ° m Lu 41 m m m m m p 2 m cr N N o o o a� LU c c c Z Q p LA �i H H LL UJ CC O AZO CO) = w = co a != _ O m c m � a wco U O o Z _ = co O co L O L U (n O c >+ r O = o \o U "� � m co _O .� O co ±.. C E e o L O O c E U) d c Z cn ~ O Co -p O I� -p +. U c a) co CE Cb 0 �c += vE qo v C.) _ ch � � H Val V1 0- w L � O O E U co .�. Q U C cz O co O 4? -p c _ co - m E v CO m is cn N �a Cl) O °o o cn o c cv E m co i� x o o o p d O v = v U IL 0 W IL Q U a. LL Ln cE o CJ r N C7 Lo CO r_ O O 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,G ,G ,G C N Y p cn cn cn cn cn cn cn co co N CL 0.� I� ai N M l!1 lD W0 1 1 To- T-- -- OL m� p a o Rock Rlvt$Dt O N — S - 1I, Fall Rival Or 4 N� 1 inch=1,000 feet Emerald 1.81116"Dr p P Sod • 9f Lawrrlu 0.d c ntwoo N 60 av5\\� O f r ¢a OdL trearn IF A - W� 8 lw eed Pl `"ny CII w Bre S VW. a . Amber Or 8 c = Down ream Ln YMZr R p` i oI � ✓i a � nr-.�. 1witily Cl N aae Benmar _ Brlarwood Ln A 4 4 _ _ W o 3` ' � �+St v Lad 1 = e Pyron Ave m mbarwild®^�""'u 3 F fi - Rambla at Cen r e do ook s am �• - Barn at nets — 3 a Baal at t F JUI' US Meadow Cib •i S D 9 g, �a Rd .Q No ndy Rd W » «t� Z � s An PI Cain::t Wats tha Ln w Dr v Lake Fosdic Lail Oeth Lh Is 186 ac. a Meado ook Or M•adoarbtmok Of I� ir u o � i ion on Ave 7. v e - Morris Ave Jr ` K t � $o Norms at Nor t o i sl U a W nwood Cl z 0 z � I z Laaaaatar AV.aTI 1IIe—'ME7— 1X=W"F' L _ Tx4W t rA tay E e 1j Virginia Ln Virginia Ln ± w y`• K U � In ; u Legend pve Pa A,e Active Stam Drain W Inlet a _ • Manhole Channels - Vinson at <' PipashedISv Central Meadowbrook v Lake Foedic Attachment E: Study Area Location Map r Sul invited Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood r ®Do 1—in mpsh,,e Blvd • =.k"m o Drainage Study (SWS-058) ® 5 Sources:Esri, DeLorme,NAVTEQ, USGS,Intermap,PC,NRCAN,Esri on Japan,METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),Esri(Thailand),TomTom,2013 FORTWORTH. Ramesh S Chintala Atkins North America, Inc. 18383 Preston Rd., Suite 500 Dallas,TX 75252 RE: Request for Change Form Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study DOE#: TPW-SWS-058 City Contract No.-- Dear Mr. Ramesh S Chintala, The Minority/Women Business Enterprise (M/WBE) Office is in receipt of the Request for Change form submitted via email on February 10, 2015. The following changes, increases and/or reductions are outlined as follows: From: Scope of Work Dollar Amount Schrickel, Rollins&Associates, Inc. SUE Services $32,000.00 DFW Infrastructure,Inc. Sanitary Sewer TV Inspection $11,000.00 To: Schrickel, Rollins&Associates, Inc. SUE Services $33,000.00 DFW Infrastructure,Inc. Sanitary Sewer TV Inspection $5,000.00 Gorrondona&Associates, Inc. Surveying $5,000.00 The aforementioned changes are approved due to the scope of services for this project being changed after discussions with City of Fort Worth staff. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (817) 212-2679 or contact via email Adrian.Zavalana.fortworthtexas.gov Sincerely, Adrian Zavala Contract Compliance Specialist City of Fort Worth Economic Development-M/WBE Office cc: File Fort Worth MOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0AMICaM MINORITY/WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE OFFICE DIVISION THE CITY OF FORT WORTH * 1000 THROCKMORTON STREET * FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102 817-212-2674 * FAx 817-212-2681 1964-1993-2011 �'�Printed on recycled paper X DOE PROJECT BID NUMBEf(_,__ FU,RT VvORT one) Minority/Women Business Enterprise OtNce LETTER OF INTENT TO PERFORM AS A MBE SUBCONTRACTOMUSCONSULTANT [NOTE: Pursuant to the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance,MBE firms participating under the Ordinance must be certified prior to recommendation of award In order to be caroted towards subcontracting participation.If the City of Fort Worth determines that a proposed MBE is not certified according to the Ordinance requirements the firm should immediately submit a completed certification application to the North Central Texas Regional Certification Agency(NCTRCA),624 Six Flags Drive,Suite 100,Arlington,TX 76011.1 1. Name of Project Central Meadowtuook Nelghborhood Dakam study Z. Name of Offeror/Prime contractor Atkins Nord(America. Inc, 3. The undersigned is prepared to perform the following described work and/or supply the material listed in connection with the above project(where applicable specify'supW or Install!of both): Perform CCTV condo assessment for storm drain Dk&s At the price of: 5.000 DFW Infrastructure Inc. E 10.2015 _ (Name of MBE Firm) (Date) 0 Ircte wry 7AAge(nt�of MBE firm)Type or Print Name ign of Owner or Authorized Agent of MBE flim) 101Ayl rk, #t i V% C V-1AS�Y L-�C:,.'Ct.r M .C a (In ffisatill Addmu to appear on Lls*go provided by dna MWBE fie) (OrNrae aid For Numbers) AFFIDAVIT OF Offeror/Prime CONTRACTOR �( I HEREBY DECLARE AND AFFIRM that I, /'tat, �a+i� G'r am the duly authorized representative of Circle one(0 Xg' Atkins North America,Inc. and that I have personally reviewed the material and Nepro of Prat"contractor facts set forth in this Letter of Intent to Perform. To the best of my knowledge,information and belief,the facts In this form are true, and no material facts have been omitted, Pursuant to the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance,any person[entity]who makes a false or fraudulent statement in connection with participation of a MBE firm in any City of Fort Worth contract may be referred for debarment procedures under the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance. I do solemnly swear or affirm that the signatures contained herein and the information provided by the Prime Contractor are true and correct,and that I am authorized on behalf of the Prime Contractor to make the affidavit. OM�'tfA P k/ S. t A h, 11,'t-e i"�°S��tf• Atkins North America,Inc, Circle One(Own en Typfi or Print Name (Name of Prkn s Contractor- M or Type) ,/l, t 4Z41 w _ Febft"10,2015 (Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent) (Olde) ?7'd— S'ooy- its" .. (oldoe 1 (fox Numbs" 6/1/2012 X DOE PROJECT BID NUMBER FORT AVO RT H (Pleas check Minority/Women Business Enterprise Office LETTER OF INTENT TO PERFORM AS A MBE SUBCONTRACTOR/SUBCONSULTANT [NOTE: Pursuant to the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance,MBE firms participating under the Ordinance must be certified prior to recommendation of award in order to be counted towards subcontracting participation. If the City of Fort Worth determines that a proposed MBE is not certified according to the Ordinance requirements the firm should immediately submit a completed certification application to the North Central Texas Regional Certification Agency(NCTRCA),624 Six Flags Drive,Suite 100,Arlington,TX 76011.] 1. Name of Project Central li,"eadOribr ook Neighborhood Drainage Study 2. Name of Offeror/Prime contractor Atkins North America Inc. 3. The undersigned is prepared to perform the following described work and/or supply the material listed in connection with the above project(where applicable specify'supply*or"install"or both): Survey of stormwater infrastructure components at the price of$ 5.000 Gorrondona&Associates Inc. February 10,2015 _ (Name of MBE Firm) (Date) W.Truett Wilson Circle one(Ownerlikuthodzed Agent of MOE It Type or Print Name (Signature of owner or Authorized Agent of MBE firth) wilson@ga-inc.net (T)817-496-1424 (F)817-496-1768 (Email Address to appear on Listings provided by the MWBE Office) (Office and Fax Numbers) AFFIDAVIT OF Offeror/Prime CONTRACTOR t� I HEREBY DECLARE AND AFFIRM that 1,�#-W .5. a %r _am the duly authorized representative of Circle one(Owne uthorized Agen Atkins North America,Inc. and that I have personally reviewed the material and Name of Prime Contractor facts set forth in this Letter of Intent to Perform. To the best of my knowledge,information and belief,the facts in this form are true, and no material facts have been omitted. Pursuant to the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance, any person [entity]who makes a false or fraudulent statement in connection with participation of a MBE firm in any City of Fort Worth contract may be referred for debarment procedures under the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance. I do solemnly swear or affirm that the signatures contained herein and the information provided by the Prime Contractor are true and correct,and that I am authorized on behalf of thePrimeContractor to make the affidavit. e A_ $,.t��,�✓✓! Atkins North America,Inc. Circle One(OwneriQREonz Agen ype or Print Name (Name of Prime Contractor-Print or Type) A. — February 10,2015 (Signature of Owner or Authorized Agent) (Dale) 4 -?Z -- 97.k— 3gn - ;:tea (Office Number) (Fax Number) 6/1/2012 DOE PROJECT-t,BID NUMBER (Please check one) FORT WORTH MOM Minority/Women Business Enterprise Office LETTER OF INTENT TO PERFORM AS A SBE SUBCONTRACTOR/SUBCONSULTANT [NOTE: Pursuant to the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance,SBE firms participating under the Ordinance must be certified prior to recommendation of award in order to be counted towards subcontracting participation. A,Mjj Business Enterprise(SBE)is defined as a business concern located in the marketplace that meets the Unites States Small Business Administration definition of a small business as outlined in the code of Federal Regulation 13 CFR 121. Firms certified as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)also meet small business enterprise requirements.] 1. Name of Project Centre)Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Study 2. Name of Offeror/Prime contractor Atkins North America,Inc. 3. The undersigned is prepared to perform the following described work and/or supply the material listed in connection with the above project(where applicable specify'supply"or Install'or both): Perform subsurface utility enaineerina services(Levels BW and mvide technical sUDDort inchfdind GIS, Cost es6ination,and Constructabilh Review,and Report Preparation at the price $33.000 Schrickel.Rollins and_Associates,Inc. - February 10.2 15 (Nome of off SBE Firm) (Date Grcle one(Own A SBE firm)Type or PrIM Nems gnature of nor or Authorized Agent of SBE firm) �s�o�� t✓ sr4!.?�S1yN, Lo•w XY 7 G Of%,3 ZI4 lP, 8/A6 (Email Address to appear on Listings provided by the MWBE Office) (Office and Fox Numbers) AFFIDAVIT OF Offeror/Prime CONTRACTOR I HEREBY DECLARE AND AFFIRM that I, A 4 tl'!a - am the duly authorized representative of Circle one(Own Agen AtWns Nath America Inc. and that I have personally reviewed the material and Name of Prime Contractor facts set forth In this Letter of Intent to Perform. To the best of my knowledge,information and belief,the facts in this form are true,and no material fads have been omitted. Pursuant to the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance,any person[entity]who makes a false or fraudulent statement in connection with participation of a SBE in any City of Fort Worth contract may be referred for debarment procedures under the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance. I do solemnly swear or affirm that the signatures contained herein and the information provided by the Prime Contractor are true and correct,and that I am authorized on behalf of the Prime Contractor to make the affidavit. ea ffAew f .&14, Ui to Pl-CSi dpi✓' Atkins North America,Inc. Circle a(Own ed A Type or Print Name (Name of Prime Contractor-P nt or Type February 10,2015 (Slgnsh re of Owner or Authorized Agent) (Delo) Ry-I -S-87-3 f -Z601 (OUIn Number) (Fox Nunes 6/1/2012 3 aysa�paa II$ m ilii �' i[i: ��� {. luellns !q g�� i i w � h �3 I� OF � m 11& A T Rij c SY U3 � 1 uoda s angeyclWWPtl .- { mlu4 1 i X341 {I) i ry ueaaMJ i �9", L —o dnS PlaijRwnS �ip i�! ���� pi b a uepryogal �� fi' �i- .twnS E `. iii i i} iaBeueW t,. Gni ';: peloid �i a �� �m � .- u�m m r n.in in I.d u°I¢tlpu d i ry `I •-m t� •-ry� << m� n .-�.-ry n� � n s —n om.- (i� u (ii IV Ll031 { w °' w 5 j{ j 22€° e g i b o ��v"�n$e �E�v��a I•; �LL o a mo b T b sib ,q� 0��� i �E� m''o �a �a a Q�gob Q._�� m � mSav �F - U � X - ���i IIE (i i'i a.n mea Ili I,, lii e tt ill i i�wns Sae 1lL Ijf _ ip 41 en ie.le�ul Ptl 1�P fRaWIJ slf, 6i .Pawaa q Ir 3H i N B RM.Bs 47 y $ ; siaa n. B....i it t� aaulB 3 a F v ..F.d I:i ( � W � I .ti 3' III III,. �E° o EoB- mF ., r Y �I moU � �E�`�swo oq$�if3 I. w a4 € . EaE E 'fi mo �' aZ a..... Awa.<�&� we M&C Review Page I of 2 Official site of the City of Fort Worth,Texas CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORT_ N'4-'oRT_il COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 9/9/2014 DATE: 9/9/2014 REFERENCE ,C-26950 LOG NAME: 20SWMCENTRALMBDRAINAGE NO.. CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC NO HEARING: SUBJECT: Authorize Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Atkins North America, Inc., in the Amount of$215,000.00 for the Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Master Plan (COUNCIL DISTRICT 8) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Atkins North America, Inc., in the amount of$215,000.00 for the Central Meadowbrook Neighborhood Drainage Master Plan. DISCUSSION: The Agreement recommended by this Mayor and Council Communication will determine drainage improvement opportunities within the portions of the Central Meadowbrook and West Meadowbrook neighborhoods potentially subject to flooding from undersized storm drains. Results will be used to develop joint drainage-roadway projects on neighborhood streets identified in the 2014 CIP and to clearly diagnose system deficiencies, identify technical solutions, and assign priority among other drainage needs within the City. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was published for these services on November 17, 2011 and December 1, 2011, in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Forty three consultants responded and sixteen consultants were selected to perform work. Atkins North America, Inc., was selected as the most qualified consultant for this work.Atkins North America, Inc., proposes to perform the scope of work for this contract for a lump-sum fee in the amount of$215,000.00. M/WBE Office-Atkins North America, Inc., (formerly PBS&J, an Atkins Company) is in compliance with the City's BDE Ordinance by committing to 20 percent SBE participation on this project. The City's SBE goal on this project is 20 percent. This Stormwater Master Plan study area is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 8. FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current operating budget, as appropriated, of the Stormwater Utility Fund. TO Fund/AccounVCenters FROM Fund/AccounVCenters PE69 531200 0209202 $215,000.00 Submitted for City Manager's Office by: Fernando Costa (6122) Originating Department Head: Douglas W. Wiersig (7801) Additional Information Contact: http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=18861&councildate=9/9/2014 9/10/2014 M&C Review Page 2 of 2 Steven E. Eubanks (7857) ATTACHMENTS SWS-058 Meadowbrook.pdf http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=18861&councildate=9/9/2014 9/10/2014