HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 26137 AMENDMENT NO. 2
STATE OF TEXAS 8 CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO A J tO
(No M&C Needed)
COUNTY OF TARRANT S
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth (City) and Wade & Associates,
Inc. , (Engineer) made and entered into City Secretary Contract No.
23763, (the Contract) which was authorized by the City Council by
M&C C-16691 on the 24th day of March, 1998; and subsequently
revised by one previous amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Contract involves engineering services for the
following project:
Engineering contract for the design of Main M-390 Drainage
Area, Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Improvements (Group 6,
Contract 1) , Part 5 and M-106R Drainage Area Sanitary Sewer
System Rehabilitation and Improvements (Group 4, Contract 2) ,
Part 7 .
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to execute Amendment No. 2 to
said Contract to include an increased scope of work and revised
maxJ mum fee;
NOW THEREFORE, City and Engineer,_ acting herein by and through
their duly authorized representatives, enter into the following
agreement which amends the Contract:
1.
Article I of the Contract is amended to include the additional
engineering services specified in a proposal letter dated July 31,
2000 a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.
The cost to City for the additional design services to be performed
by Engineer total $10 ,389.16.
2 .
Article II of the Contract is amended to provide for an
increase in the maximum fee to be paid to Engineer for all work and
services performed under the Contract, as amended, so that the
total fee paid by the City for all work and services shall not
exceed the sum of $328,019.24 JIMCI A Ur � D1vJ
D�
3 .
All other provisions of the Contract which are not expressly amended
herein shall remain in full force and effect. ¢-
EXECUTED on this the Z"dayof _t 2000, in Fort Worth,
Tarrant County, Texas. may)
AT -Alt)
Contract Authorization
Gloria Pearso , City Sec eta
-,��7 beta
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:
A. Douglas Rademaker, P.E. Mike Groomer
Director, Department of Assistant City Manager
Engineering
WADE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEER
By:
Name: Mark Wade, P.E.
President
6701 Brentwood Stair Road
Fort Worth, TX 76112
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Gary Steinberger
Assistant City Attorney
23763
-2-
c0 nn♦���� G?�'PON
WHO E
d•.A�SiGI_gTES�111C_
31 July, 2000
Department of Engineering
Integrated Wet Weather Program
ATTN: Mr. Mike Domenech, P.E.
811 Lamar Street, Suite 310
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
RE: Submission of REVISED Contract Amendment No. 2,
Main M-390 Drainage Area, Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Improvements
(Group 6, Contract 1), Part 5, DOE 1649, Sewer Project No. PS46-070460410280,
and M-106R Drainage Area Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation and
Improvements (Group 4, Contract 2), Part 7, Sewer Project No. PS46-070460410150
WADE File Nos. 9803 & 9804
Dear Mr. Domenech:
Per your request, we have examined our previous contract amendment request and have
adjusted the numbers down. It is important to note that we do not agree that a reasonable fee
for the work item related to the incorporation of specification changes that came up during
the re-advertisement phase is only $4,000 as stated to me last Friday. We were granted
nearly twice that amount in an amendment for essentially the same task on our M-CIC413
contract recently. As you will see in the itemized information below, we have substantively
reduced our proposed amendment by over 25% which we believe shows good faith and
representative of our cooperation with the City.
Therefore we are submitting Revised Contract Amendment No. 2 to the above referenced
contract to account for additional work beyond the original scope of work. This includes the
incorporation of Unit 5 into the project plans, the integration of new Standard Specifications
and addressing various design changes associated with them, and the recovery of addenda
costs. Specifically, we are seeking approval of the following additional work items in the
amendment request as described below:
Phases la & Ib — Design Services: Sewer Pipeline Rehabilitation for 11-390 (Basin E &
mise. locations) Drainage Areas
• The incorporation of Unit 5 into the project plans including consultant coordination
into the Contract Documents.
WADE was asked to incorporate several plan sheets into this project that were designed
by Dikita Engineering. This project was established as Unit 5 and was predominately
related to the installation of gabion baskets and gabion mats along a creek. Originally,
Consulting Eng i n e e s
570' BreqfNood Stair Road project the incorporation of this material into our was thought e very to bminor task and
S t o 1 0 0 'N
8 1 7 . 4 5 1 2 8 2 0
FAX 81 7 .451 • 2208 ie,� G.I�S,Clvlu�)D
If'J !r
Page 2 of 3
Mr. Mike Domenech
7/3 1/2000
should be easily handled. In fact, it proved to be very time consuming and difficult.
Effectively, WADE staff produced all materials necessary for the contract documents for
Dikita, except for the Part B proposal section. WADE staff incorporated specification
clarifications and plan notes and issued them in an addendum in order to address
contractor inquiries concerning this Project Unit. Additionally after receiving bids,.
WADE produced the bid tabulation for this project and provided extensive coordination
with Dikita Engineering throughout the duration of this project. The following table
reflects the staff hours and miscellaneous costs associated with this work item.
Staff/Item Hours Labor Direct Total
Expenses Ex enses Expenses
Senior Engineer 12 S 1,209.48 $ 1,209.48
($100.79/hr)
Staff Engineer 46 S 2,981.72 $ 2,981.72
($64.82/hr)
Senior Office 10 S 609.40 $ 609.40
Technician ($60.94/hr)
Clerical ($39.63/hr) 8 S 317.04 $ 317.04
Printing/Plotting/Fax/ $ 180.00 S 180.00
Coping Costs (In-house)
Labor Subtotal: S 5,117.64
Direct Expenses Subtotal: $ 180.00
TOTALS: $ 5,297.64
• The Incorporation of numerous City directed revisions to Supplemental Section C
and Sections D and DA addressin14 various Technical and Legal/Administrative
issues into the Contract Documents.
Under the above referenced contract element, WADE was asked to incorporate numerous
specification changes that required edits to the project plan/profile sheets (CAD edits)
and the re-plotting of those plan sheets, and the selected revision of the contract
documents/specifications. This also includes the recovery of costs associated with
issuing 3 addenda related to the above-referenced contract document changes. The table
below reflects the staff hours and miscellaneous costs associated with this work item.
Staff/Item Hours Labor Direct Total
Expenses Ex enses Expenses
Senior Engineer 8 S 806.32 $ 806.32
($100.79/1-tr)
Staff Engineer 30 S 1,944.60 $ 1,944.60
($64.82/hr)
Senior Office 16 S 975.04 $ 975.04
Technician (S60.94/hr)
Wade & Associates, Inc. J ��IGQ �
Consulting Engineers
?17
Page 3 of 3
Mr. Mike Domenech
7/31/2000
Clerical ($39.63/hr) 12 $ 475.56 $ 475.56
Printing/Plotting/Fax/ $ 890.00 $ 890.00
Coping Costs (In-house)
Labor Subtotal $ 4,'_01.52
Direct Expenses Subtotal: $ 890.00
TOTALS: $ 5,091.52
In summary, WADE seeks to recover actual expenses that either have been or are currently
being incurred for all of the work items addressed and itemized in the table below.
Amendment Item Total Fee Requested
The incorporation of Unit 5 into the project plans including $ 5,297.64
consultant coordination into the Contract Documents:
The Incorporation of numerous City directed revisions to $ 5,091.52
Supplemental Section C and Sections D and DA
addressing various Technical and Legal/Administrative
issues into the Contract Documents:
TOTAL AMENDMENT REQUEST: $ 10,389.16
Therefore, we are requesting Contract Amendment No. 2 in the amount of$ 10,389.16 to the
original M-390 Agreement. This amendment_would increase the total contract amount from
$317,630.08 to $328,019.24, representing an increase of nearly 3.3 percent (3.27%). As is
indicated throughout the above narrative work descriptions, WADE was directed by City
Staff to address the items discussed above.
We would appreciate your help to expedite this request. We are prepared to meet with you
to discuss this amendment at your earliest convenience. As stated before, we intend to
submit another amendment under this contract in order to address the costs associated with
the re-advertisement of Units 1, 3 and 5 and to recover additional survey costs in excess of
budgeted amounts. Do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need any
background information concerning this matter. Thank you for your time and consideration.
WADE & ASSOC ES, INC.
Chris Br E.,
Project Manager
CC: Peter Fu, P.E., FWWD, City of Fort Worth
Tony Sholola, P.E., DOE, City of Fort Worth
Mark Wade, P.E., President, WADE
Wade & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers i
1
_ . .