HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 10472:Y' i.
n , .,_
ORDINANCE NO.. f~ ~~~"
AN ORDINANCE DISANNEXING AND DISCONTINUING TERRITORY
FROM WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF FORT
WORTH, TE~{AS; PROVIDING THAT TINS ORDINANCE SHALL AMEND
EVERY PRIOR ORDINANCE IN COI~ZICT HEREHiITH; PROVIDING
THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CCA~lULFiTIVE OF ALL PRIOR
ORDINANCES NOT IN DIRECT CONFZICT; PROVIDING FOR
SEVII2ABILITY RND NAMING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINID BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That the hereinafter territory within the corporate limits of the City of Fort
Worth, Texas, be and the same is hereby disannexed and discontinued as a part of
the City of Fort Worth, Texas, said territory being described as follows:
Being a portion of the J. Wilcox Survey No. 47, Abstract No. 1721, of Tarrant
County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the West right-of-way line of Eagle Mountain Circle and the North
line of the J. Wilcox Survey No 47, Abstract No. 1721;
THENCE East along the North line of the J. Wilcox Survey No. 47, Abstract No.
1721, 451 feet to the Northeast corner of said survey;
THENCE South 1 Degree 03 Minutes West, 1208 feet to a point for corner in the
South right-of-way line of Ten Mile-Azle Road;
THENCE West, along the South right-of-way line of Ten Mile-Azle Road to the West
right-of-way line of the easternmost access road for Eagle Mountain Circle;
THENCE Northwesterly, along the West right-of-way line of the easternmost access
road for Eagle Mountain Circle to the West right-of-way line of Eagle Mountain
Circle;
THENCE North, along the West right-of-way line of Eagle Mountain Circle to the
place of BEGII~iNING and containing approximately 12.5 acres, more or less.
~~ ~ _ ~ ~;
~~
. ,~- .:;
.. _
SECTION 2.
That the above described territory is shown on the attached map marked Exhibit
"A" on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Fort Worth,
Texas, which map is expressly incorporated herein by reference for the purpose
of illustrating and depicting the location of the hereinabove described
territory.
SECTION 3.
That this ordinance shall and does amend every prior ordinance in conflict
herewith, but as to all other ordinances or sections of ordinances not in direct
conflict, this ordinance shall be, and the same is hereby made cumulative.
SECTIOIJ 4
That it is hereby declared to be the intent of the City Council that the
sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are
severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect
any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of
this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council
without the incorporation in this ordinance of any unconstitutional phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
T
°~ ~ ~
~ ~ _~ 4 `
SEGTIUN 5.
t
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of
its passage by the City Council, and it i_s so ordained.
APPROVED AS TO ~10RM AND LEGALITY:
Wade Adkins, City Attorney
DATE r`~-~~-~`~
ADOPTED:
EFF'F~TIVE: ~a ~~ 9 ~ 9
5-38
A'
m iii ~u
YA: e
~lG7;iAlSS::AC~
ra 6
a.asa u
ra aAf ~/~ ~ IILi. E.ne AC
a.d AC ! ~
ra ~ ~
ra as r, ~,
a'W ~ 77 AC
ra as7
ma u
s
. ra eAA
ra aASA ra avs s.asa Ac
.aria ra ec s.aae u
aFa
ra ~ ra
ms
a
E TR ar• .aoa
aPf
f
i aASa f,s .af6 AC sIIS TR .>62 ra aea
s.Ee ~ u ra eea !a7 u ~
f aaaAf .a7 Ac
TR Y2
ra ear TR msa
.7 AC f.aaa AC 2.as AC
ra
ea
TR TR lafoA sa
u ~ s.fa7 ac ra easa
~ ra s~ TR aefzA ea u
s
TR aEf
s.a u
so
.
.aae AC ra Ma ra rn eseA
f .707 AC
~
?e _ _
COIM'Y c
ze ~ as ~ ra aaa ,a Ac ra aA~
~_ ~ .~.
ra EIl1R
~~~ .p AC ,76 AC
' ~ '~ ra aAal TR aA7
TR aAao
TR sA
x.as
~/
L`b/`
>sa ra aAS+
.
' m aASI ~ .
a
~.._., ;.~, '!~~I~~
.
~
' ra Ei 1n Tit 5
.
. ~!!
..
;~,.r .M AC
y
2.ao
'
Da
~
% ~
;:-
;
'M
~
.;,
. ~
- TA 4aAA I.na AC
aAaa ,e u
•afa
ra aAaa TR.aB I.C
.6 AL
TR aAae
` ~
; .sf u ra aAaF ra a+>Yz
.of u
ra
.,
' ..
: . .e u
s.oa
.
'' .
;.
,...
..
'~
a aAaE
.
, .
.
,.: .
_
.
:.
'~
;
R aAaA
6 u
R Wr
... s~
.. ;'.
f S AC
TR aA,1C
.~ AC
~
TSRa~
ra
f~
.:: > . ...
:,,.:
..
,:.
;.:
:: ,,.~y'~ .............
~: iii ' : ~.. ... ..' ..iii..
y~/
~. •i~1~L
~:7R:IF:: ::.~1ZS.
:.: ....: ::: ::: .; r ~: .:
i167i3ti~:1iE%
SCALE 1 = 400
CORPORATE BOUNDARY CHANGE -- CITY OF FORT WORTH
PROJECT EAGLE MOUNTAIN CIRCLE AREA FILE NO A-89-10
AREA O F F O R T W O R T H PUBLIC HEARING DATE
PREVIOUS TOTAL CITY LIMIT AREA ' SQ ~1I ORD. N 0.
TOTAL T!!IS ORDINANCE ANfVEX SQ P1I
DEA"dNEX 1ST READIfJG DATE
~~JEI; TOTAL CITY LII~~IIT AREA SQ P1I FINAL READING DATE
r ..
~;
ATTACHMENT "A"
NAMES OF PETITIONERS
1. Robert Eugene Bradberry
2. Peggy Lawler Matthews
3. Robert Lee Patthews
4. John Darrell Chailer
5. Wilma Stephens Chailer
6. JackTyne Painter Spitzer
7. David Harold Tackel
8. Lela Brimmage Chappell
9. Joseph Scott Spitzer
10. Lisa Renae Jones
11. Marie Marsden Jones
12. Carol t4cClendon Tackel
13. Juanita Hemphill Smith
14. Michaella Thorpe Bradberry
15. Chester Joel Smith
ATTACHMENT "B"
REGISTERED VOTERS IN PRECINCT 4373
IN THE 7800 AND 7900 BLOCKS OF EAGLE MOUNTAIN CIRCLE
1. Michaella Thorpe Bradberry
2. Robert Eugene Bradberry
3. John Darrell Chailer
4. Wilma Stephens Chailer
5. Lela Brimmage Chappell
6. Lisa Renae Jones
7. ~larie Marsden Jones
8. Robert F. Jones (Deceased 12-10-88)
9. Peggy Lawler Matthews
10. Robert Lee Patthews
11. Christi Lynn Mills
12. Margaret Sherrill Quick
13. Fredrick Lee Rynearson
14. Chester Joel Smith
15. Juanita Hemphill Smith
16. Jacklyne Painter Spitzer
17. Joseph Scott Spitzer
18. Carol McClendon Tack el
19. David Harold Tackel
20. Rebeckah Lynn Taylor
ATTACHMENT "C"
REGISTERED UOTERS WHO SIGNED PETITION
1. Robert Eugene Bradberry
2. Peggy Lawler P1atthews
3. Robert Lee Platthews
4. John Darrell Chailer
5. Wilma Stephens Chailer
6. Jacklyne Painter Spitzer
7. David Harold Tackel
8. Lela Brimmage Chappell
9. Joseph Scott Spitzer
10. Lisa Renae Jones
11. Marie Marsden Jones
12. Carol McClendon Tackel
13. Juanita Hemphill Smith
14. Michaella Thorpe Bradberry
15. Chester Joel Smith
{,
ATTACHMENT "D"
REGISTERED VOTERS WHO DID NOT SIGN PETITION
Robert F. Jones ~- deceased 12/10/88, notarized affidavit of
fact submitted
Christi Lynn Mills - certified correspondence from this office not
returned
Margaret Sherrill Quick
Fredrick Lee Rynearson - certified correspondence returned to this
office marked "moved left no address unable
to forward"
Rebeckah Lynn Taylor - certified correspondence from this office not
.returned
City Plan Oaamission--11/29/89
Dew+elopmar~t Review Cacm~ittee--11/22/89
Staff Information Report
A-84-10 DISAr1+1E~CFaIC7~1: EAGLE MCIII~AIN CIRGi.E ARFA (ADnroat. 12.5 Acres)
Northeast corner of Ten Mile-Azle Road (Co.Rd.# 4030) and Fagle l~untain Circle
The Fort Worth City Secretary has received a petition from Ms. Carol Taakel,
requesting that a residential area frontingr on .Eagle Mountain Circle be
disannexed from the corporate limits of the City of Fort Worth. The total area
being considered for disannexation is approximately 12.5 acres and was annexed
on December I7, 1924 by C)rdinance No. 1034. There are approximately 16
registered voters in the area.
F~istina Land Use and Physical Characteristics
The property proposed for disannexation is located at the northeast corner of
Ten Mile-Azle Road (Co Rd.# 4030) and Eagle Mountain Circle. The site includes
single family houses Surrounding land uses include: residential and undeveloped
land to the north, east and west and the Fort Worth Nature Center to the south.
Access
Access to the site is provided by Ten Mile-Azle Road and Eagle Mountain Circle.
The Master Thoroughfare Plan depicts Ten Mile-Azle Road as a 6-lane divided
principal arterial (120'rightrof-way).
Platting and Zoning
The site and land to the east and south is zoned "A" One Family Residential.
District Plan
The North/Northwest Fort Worth District Plan approved by the City Plan
Commission on September 27, 1989, depicts low density residential for this site.
The District "E" Plan, adopted in 1972, however, recoamnends parks and
drainageways for the subject site.
Planning Department
Planning staff is opposed to the requested disannexation Staff reccxr~rsends
annexing the surrounding area to maximize delivery of services to this area.
Park and Recreation Department
Disannexation would create no problems for the Park and Recreation Department.
No facilities are currently being provided within the area proposed to be
disannexed
Water Department
The Water Department has no objections to the disannes~tion of the subject 12.5
acres. The Water Department has no existing water or sanitary sewex within, or
in the vicinity of the site The nearest City of Fort Worth facilities are 3 1!2
City Plan Commission--li/29/89
De~velvpment Revie~.l Committee-11/22/89
Staff Information Report A-89-10--Page 2
miles to the east in Eoat Club Road In addition, there are no C.I.P projects
planned for the immediate future that would bring water or sanitary sewer to
the site
The Current water service for the site is provided by Central Texas Utilities,
Inc (a private water supply ooir~any), which appears to hold a~Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity for water service to the subject property. Under state
statutes, the Fort Worth Water Department could not provide service to the area
even if facilities were available. The site uses individual lot disposal systems
(septic tanks) for sewer service, isee Health Department Co~rments also)
Transportation and Public Works Department
Report received with no comments
Fire Department
The Northeast corner of Ten Mile-Azle Road and Eagle Mountain Circle does
receive Fire Department protection and emergency medical service from Fort
Worth Currently, response into the area is provided by Fire Station No 13,
located at 5333 Lea Crest Lane.
Police Department
The area in question is in the northwest area of the City and is nearest to
Police Reporting Area (PRA) 5150. The disannexation of the 12.5 acres of the
area kncxm as Eagle Mountain Circle from the corporate limits of the City of
Fort Worth would have no effect on police operations.
Health Department
The Health Department has reviewed the subject request If this residential area
fronting on Eagie Mountain Circle is disannexed, the Environmental Health
Services Division is not aware of any adverse environmental problems associated
with this area In 1986 this Division provided notable service to this area in
the form of a septic system inspection., The location of this inspection was at
7960 Eagle Mountain Circle which is tract 4A06H Jacob Wilcox Survey #47 Abstract
1721, tree Water Department com;r~ents alsot. The Health Department has no
objections to the requested disannexation
City Services Department
Report was not zeceived by the deadline
Department of Law
The Department of Law has reviewed the proposed disannexation and has no
objections to sane
City Plan Commission--11/29/89
Development Review CXxrmittee--11122/89
Staff Information Report A-89-10--Pa~+e 3
DEVQAPMENT REVIEW CC~lMITTEE REPORT - 11/22/89
Ms Carol Tackel, representing the hoa~ieowners fronting on Fagle Mountain Circle
that made this disannexation request, appeared before the Development Review
Committee Ms Carol Tackel answered all of the questions from the Cannittee.
The Development Review Committee recommended APPROVAL of this request
DDCISION OF CITY PLAN COMMISSION - 11/29/89
Ms Carol Tackel, representing the homeowners fronting on F~gle Mountain Circle
that made this disannexation request, appeared before the City Pian Commission.
Ms Carol Tackel answered all of the questions from the Commission.
The City Plan Commission voted to APPROVE disannexation of this area
w..~~ ~ ~it~ of ' 1F®a°t ~®rth, ~C~~~~
~ca~oa° a~ad ~oun~il ~o~a.~a.un~~at~~n
DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT REPORT ON PETITION FOR 0 N- PAGE
NUMBER NEXATION OF 7800 AND 7900 BLOCKS OF 4
12/12/89 OCS-51 EAGLE MOUNTAIN CIRCLE for
OPTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
1. Take no action at all on the petition, in which event one or more of the
signers of the petition may bring a lawsuit against the City to request
that the area be disannexed, or
2. The City Council may make a determination as to the sufficiency or
insufficiency of the petition.
(a) If the City Council finds that the petition is insufficient, the
City Council should deny the petition on the grounds of
insufficiency.
(b) If the City Council finds that the petition is sufficient, then the
City Council may adopt an ordinance disannexing the subject
property.
(c) If the City Council finds that the petition is sufficient, but the
City Council desires not to disannex the property, then it may vote
to deny the petition.
3. If the City Council desires to consider the sufficiency of the petition
and desires to disannex the property, then it should instruct the City
staff to prepare an ordinance and a Mayor and Council Communication for
consideration at the City Council meeting of December,~T.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND FINDINGS. l9
On November 7, 1989, a petition was presented to this office for the
disannexation of the 7800 and 7900 Blocks of Eagle Mountain Circle. This
property was annexed as the result of a Charter Amendment held on
December 11, 1924, and is located north of Ten Mile Bridge Road and west and
north of the Fort Worth Nature Center and is a part of District 7. The
petition (Attachment A) alleges that the City of Fort Worth has failed to
provide services as provided under Section 43.141 of the Local Government
Code.
ITEMS TO 8E VERIFIED
The Texas Local Government Code prescribes that petitions for disannexation
for failure to provide services can be made by a majority of the qualified
voters of the annexed area and must
(1) be written,
(2) request the disannexation,
(3) be signed in ink or indelible pencil by the appropriate voters,
(4) be signed by each voter as that person's name appears on the most
recent official list of registered voters,
+ ~,
~~
.` .a
YDA7E REFERENCE SUBJECT REPORT ON PETITION FOR DISAN- PACE
NUMBER NEXATION OF 7800 AND 7900 BLOCKS OF I 2 4
t2/12L8~__ OCS-51 EAGLE MOUNTAIN CIRCLE I °'
(5) contain a note made by each voter stating the person's residence
address, precinct number, and voter registration nu-nber that
appears on the person's voter registration certificate,
(6) describe the area to be disannexed and have a plat or other
likeness of the area attached,
(7) be presented to the secretary of the municipality,
(8) notice of the petition must be given by posting a copy of the
petition for 10 days in three public places in the annexed area,
and
(9) a copy of the petition must be published once in a newspaper of
general circulation serving the area before the 15th day before the
day the petition is first circulated and proof of the posting and
publication must be made by attaching the follo-~uing to the petition
presented to the City Secretary
(a) the sworn affidavit of any voter who signed the petition,
stating the places and dates of the posting, and,
(b) the sworn affidavit of the publisher of the newspaper in which
the notice was published, stating the name of the newspaper
and the issue and date of publication.
FINDINGS
The findings of the City Secretary regarding the petition for disannexation
presented on November 7, 1989, are as follows.
1. The petition contains 15 signatures (Attachment A)
2. There are 20 registered voters in the 7800 and 7900 Blocks of Eagle
Mountain Circle (Attachment B)
3. 15 registered voters signed the petition (Attachment C)
4. 5 registered voters did not sign the petition (Attachment D)
(one registered voter is deceased (notarized statement of fact
furnished)), one registered voter allegedly has not lived in
Precinct 4373 for eight years and his voter's registration was
cancelled on November 11, 1989, five days after the petition was
submitted, and certified correspondence to him at this address was
returned to this office, two registered voters are either students
living away from the their family-owned residences in the precinct
or recently moved from the precinct to an out-of-the-city location,
and one registered voter lives in the precinct and did not sign the
petition)
5. All signed names on the petition are as they appear on the most
recent list of registered voters
6. All addresses on the petition are as they appear on the list of
registered voters
7. The petition requests disannexation
8. The petition is in writing
9. The petition was signed in ink by the appropriate voters
10. The petition contains the person's precinct number and voter
registration number
11. The petition describes the area to be disannexed and has a plat of
the area
i2. The petition eras presented to the secretary of the municipality
w d ~ '
.i ~ ~ r i
:~r_- a
GATE .. REFERENCE SUBJECT REPORT ON PE - ITIUN F R PACE
~; ~ ~ NUfiABER NEXATION OF 7800 AND 7900 BLOCKS OF I 3 4
12 12 89 OCS-51 EAGLE MOUNTAIN CIRCLE ~ ~+
13. The petition contains a certified affidavit of the publication of
the petition on September 13, 1989, which was more than 15 days
before the date the petition was first circulated
14. The petition contains a notarized statement of the posting of the
petition for 18 days in three public places in the annexed area.
HISTORY OF ANNEXATION
Until 1959, the city limits were described by metes and bounds in the Charter
and amending the City Charter was the method by which land was annexed. The
land requested for disannexation was added to the City of Fort Worth upon the
adoption of a new charter in 1924. Ordinance No. 1034 was adopted on
November 4, 1924, calling a Charter Amendment election for December 11, 1924.
Included in the Charter Amendments were the annexations of the area being
requested for disannexation, the Centennial grounds and adjacent area, a
sewage disposal plant area (East Fort Worth), and parts of Meadowbrook, the
Monticello area, Fostepco Heights, Worth Heights, Cobb Park, the North Jarvis
Heights area, Rivercrest, land between Hemphill and Jennings, and a municipal
golf course (Worth Hills). This was the same Charter Amendment election
which changed the City of Fort 6Jorth's form of government from a Commission
form to the present-day City Council-City Manager form of government.
"History of Annexation" maps dating back to 1966 on file in the Office of the
City Secretary clearly define the area being requested for disannexation as
an area within the corporate boundaries of the City of Fort Worth.
The petitioners assert they were unaware of the inclusion of this land within
the corporate boundaries of the City of Fort Worth until 1988 when they
received their first tax bill.
TAXES
Tax histories on properties within Fort Worth are retained for no more than
10 years. There is no evidence that taxes were levied on properties in the
7800 and 7900 blocks of Eagle Mountain Circle until 1988. The 1989 taxes and
valuations are as follows
Address
Eagle Mountain Circle Valuation City Taxes
7870 $ 65,922 $ 114..52
7880 56,725 407.97
7890 59,444 427.53
7900 61,517 553.04
7910 64,148 576.69
7920 66,829 480.64
7930 71,435 642.20
7940 59,178 425.61
7950 7,500 67.43
7960 77,775 559.36
7990 (partial/vacant) 7,500 67.43
$597,973 X4,322.42
~ X!d w
^~. 'M i„ 7
rDATE` REFERENCE SUBJECT R,FPORT ON PETITION FOR DISAN- PACE "
NUMBER NEXATION OF 7800 AND 7900 BLOCKS OF 4 4
EAGLE MOUNTAIN CIRCLE °f
REPORT OF DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
The staff report of the Development Department is attached.
CONCLUSION
As City Secretary of the City of Fort Worth, I certify that a majority of the
registered voters of the 7800 and 7900 Blocks of Eagle Mountain Circle signed
the petition for disannexation and that all technical aspects of the petition
for disannexation of the 7800 and 7900 Blocks of Eagle Mountain Circle are in
compliance with Section 43.141 of the Local Government Code.
As City Secretary, I am not in a position to determine whether or not the
City of Fort Worth has failed or refuses to provide services to the area
described in the petition for disannexation.
*Approved Recommendation No. 3. under
Options Of The City Council APPROVED D~'
CITY COUNCI~s
DEC p2 1985
City Seccstary of the
Cite of Fart Worth, Texas
SUBMfTTED FOR THE I
Cr>Y SECRETARY'S Ruth Howard DlSPO ON BY COUNCI-. PROCESSED BY
OFFICE BY• ~ APP VED
t ORIGINATING ;,_ OTHER (DESCRIBE)
I DEPARTMENT HEAD: Ruth HOWa rd i
CrrY SECRETARY
!FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
~coNTacT Ruth Howard I
~
DAT't