Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinance 5612
ORDIloTANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVID- ING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF DAGGETT AV2NUE ---- --- -- AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CONTRACT TO R.fi. GI3BINS INC. FOR THE MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBT- EDNESS THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESS- MENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS.THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CER- TIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE ESTIMATES; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSE- QUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE FORTIETH LEG- ISLATURE OF THE STATE- OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106, COMMONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDI- NANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has prepared Plans and Speci- fications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been examined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all matters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I. The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and adopted. II. There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter described portions of streets, av- enues and public places in the City of Fort Worth; Texas, to-wit: 1. DAGGETT AVENUE: From ''Nilliams Street to New York Avenue, known and designated as Unit 11 Project 104-24000-150. 2. ViILLIAMS STREET: From Stella Street to Broadway Avenue, known and designated as Unit 2, Project 104-24000-150. WILLIAP,iS STREET: From Broadway Avenue to Daggett avenue, known and designated as Unit 3, Project 104-24000-150. ^. : ST RICIT,,101.0 AVENUE: From May Street to St. Louis Avenue, known and designated as Unit 49 Project 104-24000-150. 5. EAST RICHMOND AVENUE: From Riverside Drive to Renner Avenue, known and designated as Unit 52 Project 104-24000-150. 6. RENNE.R AVENUE: From E. Richmond Avenue to Riverside Drive, known and designated as Unit 62 Project 104-24000-150. 7. i4CCURDY STREET: From E. Richmond Avenue to Elmwood Avenue, known and designated as Unit 7, Project 104-24000-150. 8. MCCUI�DY STREET: From Elmwood Avenue to 95' North, known and designated as Unit 8, Project 104-24000-150. 9. EAST RICHvIOdD AVENUE; From McCurdy Street to Uvalde Street, known and designated as Unit 9, Project 104-24000-150. 10. EAST RICH!:.IOND AVENUE: From Uvalde Street to Jessie Street, known and designated as Unit 102 Project 104-24000-150. 11. MISSISSIPPI AVENUE: From Baker Street to Glen Garden Drive, known and designated as Unit 112 Project 104-24000-150. 12. _ rrGerry v trP2 � ' to JJC® c r th 9 known and designazad aS t n-+ 12, _-ro,jec, 104-2400-C-1D0. III Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, shall be improved by raising, grading, and filling same and by constructing thereon the following, to-wit: 1. DAGGETT AVENUE-: From ';'Jil l iams Street to New York Avenue, known and designated as Unit 11 Project 164-24000-150, a , 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 2. STREET: From Stella Street to Broadway Avenue, kriovrn and designated as Unit 22 Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 3. STREET: From Broadway Avenue to Daggett Avenue, known and designated as Unit 3, Project 104-24000-150, a. 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 4. 'NEST aICHMONID AVEi?UE: rrom J:"_ay. Street to St. Louis Avenue,ltnown and designated as Unit 4, .Project 104-24000-1509 a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. �. EAST, RICH- IGND AVENUE: Frmm Riverside Drive to Renner Avenue,known and designated as Unlit 5, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete- pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 6. E-�-_A R AVENUE: From E. Richmond Avenue to Riverside Drive, known ' and designated as Unit 6, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadwa,r, 7. MCCURDY.STREET: From E. Richmond Avenue to Elmwood Avenue, known and designated as Unit 7, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot.mix asphaltic concrete pave:ent on a 30-foot roadway. 8. fvO_ .,DY STREET, From Elmwood Avenue to 95' North, known and designated as Unit 83, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 9. EAST RICHvIOND AVENUE: From thcCurdy Street to Uvalde Street, known and designated as Unit 9, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 10. EAST RICH1!10ND AVENUE: From Uvalde Street to Jessie Street, known and designated as Unit 10, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 11. MISSISSIPPI AVENUE: From Baker Street to Glen Garden Drive, known and designated as Unit 11, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 34-foot roadway. 12. BRYAN STRE-T: From Berry Street to 380' North, known and designated as Unit 12, Project 104-24000-150, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 40-.foot roadway. The above, together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurten- ances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor. IV. The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as follows, to-wit: A. The property abutting on that portion of the street, avenue or public place and the real and true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine- tenths (9/10ths) of the estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements. B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said improvements after deduct- ing the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A. The amounts payable by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners thereof and shall constitute a first and prior lien upon such properties and a personal liability of the real and true owners thereof, and shall be payable, to-wit: When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular unit, the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become payable in five (5) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of such completion and acceptance, and the assessments against the property abutting upon .the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such installments after the date of completion and acceptance of such respective unit. The entire amount assessed against the particular parcels of property shall bear interest from the date of such completion and acceptance of the improvements on the unit upon which the particular property abuts at the rate of six (67o) per cent per annum, payable annually except as to interest on the first installment, which shall be due and payable on the date said installment matures, provided that any _owner shall have the right to pay any and all of such installment at any time before maturity by paying princi- pal with interest accrued to the date of payment, and further provided if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly asthe same matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immediately due and payable; but it is specifically provided that no assessment shall in any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special benefits to property in. the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing provided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case until after notice of hearing as pro- vided by law. Said assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed-in the name of the City of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaining the right to authorize payment of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such com- pleted and accepted unit.in not more than forty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than $9.00 each, the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than 30 days after the completion and acceptance by the City of the particular unit, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby em- powered to authorize payments of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payment shall be authorized only in instances where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful, valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms there- of of the sums assessed against such property. V. The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the City Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon. and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments, or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, and the name of the owners, as far as known, and shall contain such other recitals as may be pertin- ent thereto, and shall further recite substantially that all proceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability of the owners there- of, have been regularly had, done and performed, and such recitals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substan- tially that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together wtilr reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which, as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior lien against the property, superior to all other liens and claims except State,, County, School District, and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall invalidate any assessment or any certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not invalidate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto. VI. Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and the bid of. R.11411. GIBBINS, INC. _ , having been found to be the lowest and best bid for the malting and construction of said improvements, the contract therefore is hereby awarded to R.1il. GIBBINS, INC. at and for the prices stated in the Proposal of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department, which said report and recom- mendation is on file with the City, the City Alanager, and City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the name of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things, the prices for the work. VII. To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by said contract, there is hereby appropriated out of available funds and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pay said indebtedness so incurred. VIII. The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Le-islatur e of the State of Texas, now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, Nt,,hich law has been adopted as an amend- ment Wand made a part of the'Charter of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and under which law theseproceedings are taken and had. IX. Each unit above described shall be and constitute a separate and independent unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be made for the improvements in each unit according to the cost of the improvements in that unit and according to the benefits arising from the improvements in that unit. X. In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it shall not be necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall be valid. XI. The Director of Public Works of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is hereby, ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of such improvements in each unit, in accordance with the terms of the powers and provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth, Texas. XII. The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature of the State of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature, said Act having been passed in the year 1930, and now shown as Article 1220a of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. XIII. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. XIV. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force, and effect fro and aftei the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS-_______ _ _DAY OF APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney -- -- — -- --- i 7EX 10 - s vu ~ b g Is, 1 17 r c .z0 19 18 17 16 Is Ia l3 •t2 .' 16 1s F la tb 12 .1 it EAST DAGGET --Lij ? A° 9 10. cc Ld 1.4 13 92 11 -zo 19 18 17 16 15 14 �: 1 EAST KOADWAY •• -i�� •, ,2 Q I 2 3 A y S7 t < 1A � / • , i ,� I I 17 14�� l5 14 13 1? ll1 20 ;,9 18 17 16 15 14 13 1' / 0 1 EAS-s Ile Ila- YSTELLA �; i ; i ' 1 `� „' � `, , '_ct— ` ., I•,,1 2 8 .L 5 6 •7 8 9 10 `I . 3i�•I' I iJ 2 F 5 C T 8 F-1 19 18 IT 16 5 I 14 - ocsslr� - 4' EAST PROJECT 104-24000-150 4 s 6 LEGEND 1 ^ PRESENTLY PAVED > 1 zo 119 is 17 1c 1 LL! T¢1cnrR sr , DIRT OR GRAVEL ' EAST PROPOSED PAVING UNIT. 1, DAGGETT AVENUE, and 1 « ,. UNITS 2 AND 3, WILLIAyS RZ-0 19 la 1i is 1s 14 �. STREET ST EAST ;ffi PROPERTY REPRESENTED 3Y PETITION OR POLL CARD SURVE,. � tW OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED TO PAVING � N rtI N v sr OWNERSHIP NOT SHADED IS h a OPPOSED TO PAVING I' �ZLE lV (13 31 I .r4 O © 3 30 3f 3 62 LIR T ` 'QPr, z9 3L z3 3 60 -37 !-61 - \ 3 !V /3 /¢ s V b z �: z7 �i'Ni ,;`Y,a�y ✓'9 T ' 8._�, I,31. 10 y O \ O 43 f 3 v z SZJr z 47 He �, —bo ., ,:' '�'I�• �� ti t /G /7• 4d4 Y 99 / So OND UIQ, �1 --_•... -_...:.` _ ..-- -�_ 7. ' ,.70/ � •r• � '-17 D8• i'IY r ` •1 ri '+.-nr�'e.s'^t'P9 .'f"q• �i �r r� aD Y••\1 = t 0 fY II :� 2L1,11070N /q PROJECT 104-24000-150. —T d , LEGEND PRESENTLY PAVED - — —�s• '• ¢ ,. .F E DIRT OR GRAVEL ,a 4.1 PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 4 W. RICHMOND AVENUE Ell. PROPERTY REPRESENTED F..ETITION OR POLL CARD J9 SURVEY it� ' tiTNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED ©-- " !�!} 0 PAVING 1,9 yr' OTWNERSHIP NOT SHADED I(, OPPOSED TO PAVING iO 7.. ry 10 z v it if If 00 r 2r It 4 ic.,' ............ 4Z1% TIC. to C) 21 /tit /r / ,` K �/ �. .. _ so 1\ �(n/�� 3/� e. � 3r: _ So fz T-7 711i.. ." to ry . 71, AVF • .24 At .9 *7 .6 7 ip N I 7 ul. luco 1-7 27 PROJECT 104-24000-150 GO.STRIP LEGEND 3A OLK 17 -RICH/AQN0 AVE.'. PRESENTLY PAVED 47 Lj +5 -14 DIRT OR GRAVEL � c�` � 101 0 39 PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 53a 37 EAST RICHMOND AVENUE, 13 14 and UNIT 6, RENNER .35 AVENUE 10 33 IT 1 47 1 PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY 8 -3, , 1-3 PETITION OR POLL CARD --ri-5%- --i'��, _ , z Z12 SURVEY AIz q/ l'!) 23 z3 OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED TO PAVING ARLINGTON V AVE'. OWNERSHIP NOT SHADED IS / ------- 2 6 e 9 to Ill OPPOSED TO PAVING !16 V, ��, 1716 (5 14 IJ p- J2.. A Inn /51.4000X 1 A✓L. -elfPROJECT 104-24000-150 i3 �I J � , � <� H '•' 7 '\.,. n y �.�I LEGEND ,r ✓e i► hl PRESENTLY PAVED k O DIRT OR GRAVEL Y �I/ i •I v j ••V JJ IJ JG •` IJ .� JL ` ` PROPOSED PAVING UNITS 7 :• , :° Q\ /r , 'r.. . ~ ��. AND_8, MCCURDY STREET r „ x ,� r' � and UNITS 9 AND 10, E. RICHMOND AVENUE '� � r r✓ �� f<; y \ � r _ I ---_ PROPERTY REPRESENTED B1 AVE.. \ PETITION OR POLL CARD SURVEY •' rJ JI 4 k. OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED f , ' O PAVING OWNERSHIP NOT SHADED IS ro OPPOSED TO PAVING 2 /2 ti O• i... /// JQ 1 , ✓S \ i 21C�`//�i►C'/Vjy 47 " V ` .[ 4S J <' /Jraft •. �fS ,/!09- 3 9c 1\ S ns_ S ¢ Iv 43 J (�� c ,LJ�� „ / "t i � r S ,1,/ (l� 4 � (',�, �r -a s <b C• Tz r V r/ 4: G 45 5 '/a -J S as17 47 e7 Oo r 9 •. 4o i 5- 1-r r 'r /4 ,YS �' /4 Vis.,' � ./S 1 ••! 1+ /Z 3�• �c tS /C �g tP • SS'/ r /C. •. S 9 /S J9' C /S 34 , 51 7Ye 2a , (h,� y /� V z9 `(�` 2� Z!3 : j 2g a 20 Lg .{ .• ro G zs 27 ., ` ' 22 Z7-.' : z r J 2/ 29 . E, ? � F-7 }j Pc LS ZZ 11 v Z_r Z4 24 r✓r 2y- 2G 2j 26 ,• z2 L7.' zs zs- BE Ye 3.1, ;t ;s' i; -s ' • I 3e ,� J6 J.• 9I !f Jf •f/ JO 1L Y7 ?S YI X.f -f a' ,•ff 'l0 /J .J f/ JO Yf r ` _ � AR AY 7L x.1•.91.1 i• -..I. ' � V��� l -- __. • li: -- ----- � Cl.sdn /��,L Ord—•j1,:7 • j IO • • . . _ .. . �p ,T• .. If 14 e to C r ; ! r a f T' ' ZJ4 )/ JR L! 2� Xf t• 2! y♦ i] LI i• fn //• �� so AI 1C Lf 4� 'j.' l♦ 99 IDE �'I •p .J y v I C�s s t- D �O J,/� ORD .2 5 9 c , ° / X J •9 J o // /X o ' r. 1 • J /Ir I� •. Ia n /J jt °!6 JR JI r! •/c !/ J• Ji• L! ,t7 i;Kia '•` ,• ..)' i � re f•ro C7L E/v GAe"OS& " o j7T Rf Ja •!t fI LR RP t/ i• �,� . _ �� M T11- •I �' • PROJECT 104-24000-150 T LEGEND Q/oe� •• ST• �e, � �� ' • v . aPRESENTLY PAVED DIRT OR GRAVEL T' ",.' L al R A Y/PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 11, b' 7tri _ ., ►; / 1 MISSISSIPPI AVENUE PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY PETITION OR POLL CARD �V• SURVEY ®� OWNFERSHIP NOT OPPOSED - uGd TO PAVING D %TNERSHIP NOT SHADED IS OPPOSED TO PAVING J- I• I 4 16 i 10 4 17 1.14 7 _ 1 I I I - I to /�•'.c--:�/=/�IG ' !1 7 r'G 11 i 11 LZARY IT 3 tz16 20 - J ..O I � •� b 7 �I�J l0 7 78 r I - 17 i is r'---� 17 17 17 16� 13 ' 24000 150SE � SY 24 SI �� 1 �� i � 237J ' PRESENTa PAVZD 7-7 I •, Z 2 S L)IR T OR GRAVEL �ml 20 - r 20 = 15 > L „ I c PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 1 BPMNL STREET i5 to .r 17 ° Pi:CPE i:' REPRESENTED B �, ,, PETITION OR POLL CARD SURVEY 10 t. p •lia ± r. JS �r� I Uj I^11 14. II \ ll !a . li f OiMi ERSHIP NOT OPPOSED --1O PAVING •� L•I t13 �i I' �1``l '13 .� Jr Js •� 1: J �. T • f • M M ` 5 sranw !' O[v'\LFS::IP NOT SHADED I. '•` ^�(, \ OPPOSED TO PAVING. a VICKFRY BLVD. J :_ 2 ���0 - W. DAGGETT b 1 N 9ROADWAYjil a}' A_ Y y ` 3' O Li W 4 ROADWAY i I `,S CI_Llt ill �; '�, - I �. C. IPu cl��^\ u f _ z Q w CO -j q c� 1+ !c. �:! LSSIE' ' a1 �_. I �--• . IW. �' PETER SMITH = z W,TUCKER j , E. ¢TUCKER`: �`A:� �1, 1 \ 'Y'L\ I 1)Sp ■m PENNSYLVANIA Q N a_ Z W. ANNIE `4, O 4 >-E..ANNIE- Z f, W. HATI IE Y Y O �! = / �I ` o PRUiTT N J = HA a +_ Ir J �. �� s� i or v ■ AN NON L) O E.CANNnN Harms a r- � �� COOPER I Tech N.S. W. LEUDA Z Z )- _' E. L..UCA x�(``'� ' Ig l-Iosp. 0 28 7 0 �. _ w Lu J z , TERRELL `f w a� a Y `� E. TERRELL --- �" III w w w O w >' K i O HUMROLGT z V o AVL'z C ` \ 1 SCC W PI �$cD E E.PULA K a U S 1� �f A crlC \ POGI VERB A < �� I<> /aco <n Pc . ch�,c O OLEANDER Z Y R� lnlfirmarly �� �_ I c ' cn d O E. OLEANDER - .�5 i w > o o 287 rbllJJ, �' 1- ,1 J v fN. S Lt ? yy u� w MAGNOLIA r N �? ^ IRn,A ��.. r>� _ _. ROSETJW,L" IRMALLJ , (� r w O �r10RPHY U Q a MV'AGNO(!4 I AVE�s�r� - \ 1111`�!-- 4`j{ I, \ 71-773 Y S MORPHY W HILLSIDE O a w a r..�" I o a W. v > c7 seph "_ � � z._._. �."�,. �_ • L , MORPHY � � z MYRTLE < < z a ;Ji ItEA -z- Z PARK r q ' NII■ no M R L_ x _ �� J EN AVE. Q John Peter n4 MADDOX 1 AVE LJ E.MYRTLE I e-- tn MADD X Smith 14 sp. < w � i.- 3t W.ALLEN ca qV E. > ALLEN > AV_E. c'-o I-j' Q ,r , AYE. z AVE. d ELMWOOD d d AVE,I)C3 J�8 W JEFFERSON Z E. JEFFERSON AVE. ='tw ,.._ w , f tF F W. RICHMOND ' Z / ~ . lo + E. RICHMOND } AVE. �. d E, BALTIM RE AVE. I 31NGTON 11ALTI ORE > ---r----> ! I= r c. ��y�,J a•j J HAWTHORNE w E. ARLINGTON AVE. Y w 5j E1 z '*/ DAVIS w > AVE. PH LL MAC O z u a- 2 z O >--w DAVIS LAVE. J a g Q e r HARVEY d m AVE, HAPVEY A.E. > > CARLOCK O Q ~ O E. POWELL AVE. E. POWELL 1 ,Q d U ./ E. 3 JESSAMINE ccr ')W JESSAMINE ATLANTIC E. z RAMSEY 'AVE. E.1:SutM;r.E c� = a iLIZABETH BLVD. PAGE AVE. N MARION AVE. eV w.MUIKEY MULKEY E. Z //`�� �'r 4 o -1 -i x Q RO@ERT E.ROBERT AVE. 0 r- Q� W.ROBERT a. d �_ COLVIN Q COLVIN COLVIN AYE, 2 CDL w ytt Z 4 = OO �, - . Y118 AV/r d CA 10 Jo fi00 T h ----:,tiW z✓ r r en r 8 MORNINGSIDE DR. W ' ,I Z w t r •.CRtEC51DFC„ UL� in > w N w JUDD a v /uDa7" ,� W- CANTEY d = O z )- > a "� O Q d E. CANT'Y r `+ n 4� fes. (LEN CARnE q�' Q F- m F- to (n _ (� 4F p -/ W. LOWDEN N w W w T o 3 °p H z a r O �= BAKE: �t�� fOR uGWx w. BOWIE o > z `n m ? t 0 d z z � BOWIE y3 v' -`^.,t.cam./.• \ �n BOWIE VICKI LA. , o BERRY l000 s00W. BE soo. w E. /000 BERRY t� r° , > C7 Q 2-' f Df.VITT AVSf : f E, ��� T < w +V.D VttTf' ii :__ ._y_ ! ¢i 1 1 Q L ry! p l :: tw, ' a FC� j 4 a LOW l - -LI .at.I` _- .,.\r3 j� i f1�'�l_<� SII y '!i!ii ►T1LLV8e'Y8�(.)R. LCCATIOU MAP ASSN SS ' T P V I Wol 12 LOCATIONS T14C S OTb4 Sl aQ*, USLIC WORk'S E�lGi�1E�.R1�IG DEPARTMENT DIVISION JACV. M. GRAIR4 `y� A.L. IMAIAR JR. DrauToa /Pjv CWICF tuclutta. 104 -z 150 C-2123 Attachment "B" Page 1 of 13 12 Locations on the South Side Project No. 104-24000-150 PER CENT CONTRACTPRIcE=............................................................................................................s649512.55 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 69451.25 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s 709963.80 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE..............................2}280.0 31.3 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE............................5 p 012.5 68.7 TOTAL FOOTAGE..........................................79292#5 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 15,416.40 21.7 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 359727095 50.3 GROSSAMOUNT ASSES89D..........................................................................................s 51,,144.35 72.1 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 79882031 11.1 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 43„262.04 61.0 NETAMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................s 279701.76 39.0 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 79292.5 39426.0 PER CENT 100.0 47.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 83 47 PER CENT 100.0 56,6 RESULTS OF POST NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 67 38 CARD SURVEY ARE PER CENT 100.0 56.7 AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 27 20 PER CENT 100.0 74.1 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 40 18 PER CENT 100.0 45.0 w ly �' Attachment "B" Page 2 of 13 Daggett Avenue Williams to New York Unit I PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 5,882.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 588.25 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................f 62470.75 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ „()- 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 578 100.0 .� TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 578 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 -0- 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 3.872.60 60.0 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................S 39872.60 60• LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 569.4.3 9.0 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT...............................................,.,.........................................I.........................1.11.,..1. 31303.17 51. NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................5 31167.58 49• SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 578 184.0 92.0 0.0 486.0 PER CENT 100.0 31.8 15.9 0.0 84.1 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 8 3 2 0 6 PER CENT 100.0 37.5 25.0 0.0 75.0 NO, OF PROPERTY OWNERS 6 3 2 0 4 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1 1 1 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 5 2 1 0 4 PER CENT 100.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 a Attachment "B" Page 3 of 13 Williams Road Stella to Broadway PER Unit II CENT Project 104-24000-150 CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................; 4,936.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 493.60 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST......................................................................................................._..-,,$ 5,429.60 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ -0- 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................• 400 100,0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 400 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i -0- 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 90680_00 49,3 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 29680.0 49.3 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 203.26 3,7 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 29476*74 45.6 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE............................... ......s 29952.86 54,4 ................................................................... SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 400 300 0 100 300 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 25,0 75.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 3 0 1 3 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 3 0 1 3 PER CENT 10010 75,0 0.0 25.0 75.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 3 0 1 3 PER CENT 100,0 75.0 0.0 25,0 75.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Attachment "B" Page 4 of 13 Williams Road Broadway to Daggett Unit III PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................11-5,131100 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 513.10 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 5,644.10 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE...............................m-0+- 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE..............................600 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................600 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i -0- 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 49020.00 71.2 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 4.020.00 71.2 LESS CREDITS GRANTED-............----................................................................... 493.15 8.7 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 3'526.85 62.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......:.................................................................................................i 21117.25 37.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 600 400 100 0 500 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 16.7 0.0 83.3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY if) $ 2 0 8 PER CENT 100.0 80.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 8 7 2 0 6 PER CENT 100.0 87.5 25.0 0.0 75.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 4 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 3 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 Attachment "B" Page 5 of 13 Nest Richmond Avenue May to St. Louis Unit IV PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................S 39 518.25 ENGINEERING ......................................................................................I....................... 351.82 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................f 3,870.07 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE...............................300 75.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE..............................100 25.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE...........................................400 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................f 19902.00 49.1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.............................................I...... 634.00 16.4 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................f 2'536.00 65.5 LESSCREDITS GRANTED........................................................................I....................... 631.92 16.3 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT..................................................................-........................................................... _19904o08 49.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i 19965.99 50.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 400 200 0 300 100 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 2 0 3 1 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 2 0 3 1 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 0 O 2 0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 2 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 �1: Attachment "Bo Page 6 of 13 East Richmond Riverside Drive to Renner Unit V PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................s 1 F 251.3© ENGINEERING .......................................................................................................... 125.13 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST.............................................................................................................-s 19 376.43 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................-Q.. 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE..............................AQ 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE.............................................WO 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 -0- 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 10876.00 136.3 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 19876.00 136,3 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 589.60 42.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................... 1 9 286.40 93.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................5 90.03 6,5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 280 140 0 140 140 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 1 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2, 1 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET I 1 0 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 0 0 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Attachment "B" Page 7 of 13 Renner Avenue Richmond to Riverside Drive Unit VI PER Project 104-24000-*150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE.............................................................................. ..........................0 711500.50 ENGINEERING ...................... .. ....... ....................................................................... 750.05 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST.......................................................................... ...................................S89250,55 100 0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ .a 010 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 874.5 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 874.5 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................E -0.. 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 52859o15 71.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSEO........................................................... E 59859.15 71.0 .............................. LESSCREDITS GRANTED....................................................................I...I....................- 961.25 11.6 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.............................................. ........................................................................ 4,897.90 59.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......:.................................................................................................E 8852.65 40.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 874.5 757.0 250 117.5 507 PER CENT 100.0 86.6 28.6 13.4 58.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 11 10 5 1 5 PER CENT 100.0 90.9 45.4 9.1 45.5 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 9 8 4 1 4 PER CENT 100.0 88.9 44.4 11.1 44.5 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 6 6 3 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 2 1 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 33.3 33.3 33.4 Attachment "B" Page 8 of 13 McCurdy Street Richmond to Elmwood Unit VII PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 91,573,00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 957.30 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................>E 10.530.30 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19200 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. .-.0- 010 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19200 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 89040.00 76,3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... ,.0- 0.0 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 89040,00 76.3 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1.560.00 14.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 6,480.00 61.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......:.................................................................................................$ 49050.30 38.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19200 450 300 100 800 PER CENT 100.0 37.5 25.0 8.3 66.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 19 9 4 1 14 PER CENT 100.0 47.4 21,0 5.3 73.7 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 14 7 4 1 9 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 28.6 7.1 64.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 7 4 2 0 5 PER CENT 100.0 57.1 28.6 0.0 71.4 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 7 3 2 1 4 PER CENT 100.0 42.8 28.6 14.3 57.1 f Attachment "B" Page 9 of 13 McCurdy Street Elmwood to 95' North Unit VIII PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................=1.243.75 ENGINEERING .................................................................................. 124.38 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................; 19368.13 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 150 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. _0_ 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 150 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................; 19 005.00 73.5 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... +0- 010 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ l f 005.00 73.5 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 465.00 34.0 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT..........................................................................................................................I..... 540.00 39.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................5 828.13 60.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 150 0 0 0 150 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 3 0 0 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 0 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Attachment "B" Page 10 of 13 East Richmond Avenue McCurdy to Uvalde Unit IX PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................3 4.970.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 497'00 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................¢56467.00 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................270.0 50,0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE........................-...270.0 50.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................540♦0 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 1,809.00 33.1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 19809.00 33.1 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 31,618.00 66.2 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 729.00 13.3 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 29889.00 52.9 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................;29578.00 47.1 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 540 270 270 135 135 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 2 2 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 3 1 1 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 33.4 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 1 1 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 33.3 3 33.3 33.4 C/V //� Attachment "B" Page 11 of 13 East Richmond Avenue Uvalde to Jessie Unit X PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 4.954.75 ENGINEERING .................... ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST.................................................................................. ...............i 5e450022 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE..........................--, -()- 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE..................... 540.0 1000 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 540 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................_ -0- 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 39618.00 66.4 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 39618.00 66.4 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ -0- 0.0 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 39618.00 66.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................•$ 1 v832.22 33.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 540 405 0 135 405 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 3 0 1 3 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 3 2 0 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 0.0 3.3 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 2 0 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 66.7 Attachment "B" Page 12 of 13 Mississippi Avenue Baker to Glen Garden Unit XI PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................f 91440.25 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 944.03 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................S 10f384.28 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 360 32,4 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 750 67,6 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1.9110 10000 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 29660040 25,6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 5P542.50 53.4 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i B,202.90 79.0 LESSCREDITS GRANTED........................................................................................I....... 19 040.40 10.0 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 7,162.50 69.0 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................I; 3,221.78 31,0 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET l p 110 0 240 870 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 21.6 78,4 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 5 ,0 0 2 3 PER CENT 10010 010 40,0 60,0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 5 0 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 40.0 60,0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1 .r) 0 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 v 0.0 0.0 10010 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 0 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 Attachment "B" Page 13 of 13 Bryan Street Berry to 380' North Unit XII PER Project 104-24000-150 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................si 69111*25 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 611.12 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 6722.37 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................�0- 010 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE..............................620 10010 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................620 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT ................................................... 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT........................... 51816,70 86.5 .................... GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED........................................................... ...............................$5,816.70 86.5 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................ 639.30 9.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 51177.40 77.0 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE. .....................................................................................................s 19 544.97 23.0 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 690 320 200 80 410 PER CENT 100.0 46.4 29.0 11.6 59.4 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 9 6 4 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 44.4 22.2 33.4 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 7 4 2 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 57.1 28.6 28.6 42.8 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1 1 0 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 6 3 2 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 33.3 33.3 33.4 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF WILLIAMS STREET FROM STELA TO BROADWAY PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-166 KNIT No. 2 CF 1 AMOUNT z RI NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED wo OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER pM0UN7 AFTER �� N LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS NW F Butler, George C-AF t. 5 3 J. C. Terrell 100 6.70 670.00 60.5.00 Yes 913 E. Stella Record, Ed C-A t 4 3 of 100 6.70 670.00 670.00 Yes 914 E. Broadway Robinson, Clifton A. C-A t 1 4 " 100 6.70 670.00 596.74 No 950 E. Broadway Sewell, Ruben C-A t W.33 1/3 of 4 " 100 6.70 670.00 605.00 Yes 951 E. Stella 8 400 2,680.00 2,476. 74 A 1 1 AUHNItN 1 —U- ASSESSMENT U—ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF WILLIAMS STREET FROM BROADWAY TO DACGETT PROTECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P- 66-166 UNIT NO. 3 OF 12 AMOUNT z R NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER Zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER O� n1 LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS NW I Duan, Willie Ind. 3 3 J. L. Williams 50 6.70 335.00 269.20 Yes 209 Williams Investors Savings Assn, End. 1 & N.6' of 3 56 6.70 375.20 313.04 Yes P.O. Box 8568 2 Dallas, Texas Leva, Irwin H. -Ap E.42' of 4 1 J. C. Terrels 100 6.70 670.00 670.00 No 3821 Winifred I Leva, Irwin H. -Ap 1 2 " 100 6.70 670.00 448.00 No 3821 Winifred Murray, Walter L. nd. N.2 1/6' of 2 J. L. Williams 2 1/6 6.70 14.52 14.52 les 931 E. Pulaski 5 Murray, Walter L. Ind.. 6 2 " 50 6.70 335.00 335.00 Yes 931 E. Pulaski Piper, Robert L. nd. S.44' of 2 3 " 44 6.70 294.80 245.96 Yes 1302 Marsalis Avenue Dallas, Texas Sterling, Doris Jean End. 4 3 of 50 6.70 335.00 307.25 Yes 213 Williams ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF WaU,7�AtiS SIREET FROM BkOkDWAY TO DAQ' F TT PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-1J k UNIT No. 3 OF 12 AMOUNT i RI NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED 0© OF APPARENT OWNER Z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER zi— n0i LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS F White, Grady Ind. 718 2 Je L. Williams 100 6, 70 670o0G 614, 50 Yes 200 Williams Wright, Sylvester & Bessie End. S.47 5/6' of 2 " 47 5/6 6. 70 320,48 309.38 Yes 214 Williams 5 600 4,020°00 3,526.85 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF WEST RICHMOND AVENUE FROM MAY TO ST. LOUIS PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No. 4 OF 12 AMOUNT z R! NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED OW-0— OF -OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Izt N LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS .a f Abel, Mrs. Beckie L. Roach Res. 49 9 Patillo Sub. 100 6.34 634.00 432.00 No 1828 St. Louis Emory College Broyles, I. B. & Alta M. Comm 48 9 It 100 6.34 634.00 526.00 Yes 1107 Burk Burnett Bldg. Miller, W. R. Res. 64 14 of 100 6,34 634.00 475.20 Yes 2301 Willing Payne, Cecil Gordon & Res. 33 14 " 100 6.34 634.00 470.88 No Mary Belle Bain 1901 May 400 2,536.00 1,904.08 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF EAST RICHMOND AVENUE FROM RIVERSIDE IDR. TO RENN '; , PROTECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66166 UNIT No. 5 OF AMOUNT z R NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER zt n� LOT ELK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na F Anderson, S. La ndo 4 & N,71 of 17 Graham Park 140 6.70 938000 643,20 Yes 1901 S. Riverside Drive 5 Johnson, Leroy ndo 8 & Se7e51 17 " 140 6.70 938,00 643°20 No 6708 Bridges of 7 280 1,876,00 1,286040 r 116. E 1' �y ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF RENNER AVENUE FROM E,R1CHMOINZ *E. TO RIVERSTDE DRIVE PROTECT No: 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No. 6 OF 'e; AMOUNT z R NAME AND ADDRESS w PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED co OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER W- ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na F Anderson,) S. L. z_n6. 1 thru 4 & N. 17 Graham Parr 307 6.70 2,056°90 1,470.65 Yes 1901 S. Riverside 7' of 5 Antee, A. J, Ind. 7,8 16 to 50 6.70 335.00 335.00 Yes 1813 S. Riverside Clark, Clyde Milton Ind. 21, 22 16 " 50 6.70 335.00 279.50 Yes 1921 Renner Day, W. E. Ind. 17, 18 16 to 50 6.70 335.00 335.00 Yes 1917 Renner Day, W. E. Ind. 19, 20 16 of 50 6.70 335.00 279.50 Yes 1917 Renner Elder, Burl Ind. 11, 12 16 to 50 6.70 335.00 279.50 Yes 3001 Sarah Jane Lane Elder, Burl Ind. 13, 14 16 '" 50 6.70 335.00 279.50 Yes 3001 Sarah Jane Lane Jackson, John P. Ind. 15, 16 16 " 50 6.70 335.00 279.50 Yes 500 Burk Burnett Building Johnson, Leroy Ind. 8, 9, & S.7k' 17 " 117.5 6.70 787.25 78.7.25 No 6708 Bridges of 7 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF RE ER AVENUE FROM E. RICHMOND AVE. TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE PROJECT No. 104-24000150 A.P. 66166 UNIT No. 6 OF 12 NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT z RI W FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER �� N LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Nj F Kinsey, C. C. Ind. 23, 24 16 Graham Park 50 6.70 335.00 s yp 1925 Renner New Mount Calvery Missionary Ind. 9, 10 16 " 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 `des Baptist Church 1817 Renner 874.5 5,859.15 4,897.90 2 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF DAGGE. T AVENUE FROM WILLIAMS TO NFW YORK PROJECT No. 104-24000-1.50 A.P. 66=166 UNIT No. 1, OF 12. NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT z RE FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED W0 OF APPARENT OWNER ® FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z� N LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS NW F Henderson Electric Co. ,Inc. Ind. 6 3 J . L. Williams 46 6. -0 308.20 257.14 des 962 E. Daggett Henderson, J. C. Ind. N.k of 5 3 of 46 6.70 308.20 286.00 Yes 1020 E: Cannon Investors Savings Assn. P.O. Box 8568 Ind. 1 3 of 92 6.70 616.40 514.28 No Dallas, Texas Keeton Industries, Inc. Ind. 4 4 it 92 6.70 616.40 514.28 Yes 912 E. Vickery Keeton Industries, Inc. Ind. 5 4 it 46 6.70 308.20 268.24 No 912 E. Vickery Keeton Industries, Inc, Ind. 8 4 to 46 6.70 308.20 257.14 No 912 E. Vickery Kush, Mrs. Estelle Ind. 5 1 Union Depot 105 6.70 703.50 586.95 No 1403 Joplin Thompson, Jessie James CorincInd. 4 1 of 105 6.70 703.50 619.14 No 114 New York 578 3,872.60 3,303.17 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF McCURDY STREET FROM E. RICHMOND TO ELMWOOD PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No. 7 OF 12 AMOUNT z I NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONFRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED w� W OF APPARENTOWNER z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z n� LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na Allen, W. P. Res. 1 thru 4 11 Graham Park 100 6.70 670.00 540.00 No 2720, Primrose Coleman, Leroy Res. 13, 14 11 of 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 1905 McCurdy Greene, Delmus Louis Res. 43, 44 12 to 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 1810 McCurdy Greene, Elvis Lee es. 47, 48 12 to 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 1802 McCurdy Maxwell, E. J. es. 35, 36 12 is 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 No 2109 Timberline Drive Maxwell, E. J. es. 41, 42 12 it 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 2109 Timberline Drive Maxwell, E. J. (Jack) es. 11, 12 11 to 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 3732 Lynn Crest Maxwell, E. L. es. 37, 38 12 " 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 No 3709 Bright Maxwell, E. L. Res. 39, 40 12 to 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 No • 3709 Bright ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF MeC-,,I DV 6IN,EE FROM E. RICHMOND TO EI.MWD PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No. -. OF 12 2 F NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO OF APPARENT OWNER o FEET FIER AMOUNT AFTER Z� n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na ._] Ma ell , E. L. Resa 5, 6 11 Graham Panic 50 6.70 0 335.00 170.00 Yes 2109 Timberline Maxwell, E. L. Res. 7, 8 11 " 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 2109 Timberline Maxwell, E. L. Res. 93, 10 11 '° 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 2109 Timberline Mays, Mrs. Elizabeth es. 29 thru 32 12 " 100 6.70 670.00 540.00 No 2736 Canton Drive Mitchell, Toncy B. es. 45,46 12 " 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 Yes 1816 McCurdy Myatt, J. W. es. 17 thru 20 11 " 100 6. 70 670.00 540.00 No ] 3401 Forrest Hill Ct. Pistokache, Cornelius Res. 21 thru 24 11 '° 100 6.70 670.00 540.00 No 3721 Brookline Uselton, Ola Mae es. 25 thru 28 12 1° 100 6.70 670.00 540.00 No ] 1916 McCurdy ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF McCURDY STREET FROM E. RYCHMOND TO F-LmW D PROTECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66166 UNIT No. 7 OF 12 � I NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER oz FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER zp n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS ya Ybarra, A olonia R. a 15, 16 11 Graham Parr 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 No 1908 McCurdy' Ybarra, Ynas �. 33, 34 12 " 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 No 1908 McCurdy 1,200 8,040.00 6,480.00 19O W V �• ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF MCCURDY STREET FROM EIMWOOD TO 950 NORTH PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66166 UNIT No. 8 OF 12 NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT W FRONT RAcoo R TE GROSS ASSESSED W— OF APPARENT OWNER Zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER zF— N LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na I State of Texas Highway Res. 212 22 6 Gresham Paris 50 6.70 335.00 -0- No Commission Terrell, Joe A. Res. 235 24 5 0' 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 No 1057 Evans Avenue Terrell, Joe A. Res. 259 26 5 of 50 6.70 335.00 270.00 No 1057 Evans Avenue 150 1,005.00 540.00 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF E. RICMOND AVENUE FROM McCURDY TO UVALDE PROJECT No. 104=2.4000=150 A.P. 66166 UNIT No. 9 OF 1.2 NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT z R W FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER �F~—, n+ LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na F Novikoff, Le:un Ind. 48 24 Graham Park 135 6.70 904.50 904.50 Yes 2019 E. Rosedale Novikoff, Leon Ind. 1 24 " 135 6.70 904.50 904.50 Yes 2019 E. Rosedale Pistokache, Cornelius es. 24 11 "' 135 6.70 904,50 540.00 No 3721 Brookline Smith, Dornell L. Res. 25 11 " 135 6.70 904.50 540.00 No (Address Unknown) 540 3,618.00 2,889.00 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Eo RICHMOND AVENUE FROM UVALDE TO JESSIE PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No. 10 OF 12 AMOUNT z R NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER oz FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z~ ni LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na p Harral, Norwin Glade Ind. 24 10 Graham Park 135 6.70 904.50 904.50 No 3421 Hemphill Maxwell, E. J. (Jack) Inde 48 25 it 135 6.70 904.50 904.50 Yes 3732 Lynn Crest Maxwell, E. L. Ind. 25 10 to 135 6.70 904.50 904.50 Yes 3709 Bright Maxwell, E. L. Ind. 1 25 It 135 6.70 904.50 904.50 Yes 3709 Bright 540 3,618.00 3,618.00 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF MISSISSIPPI AVENUE FROM BAKER TO GLEN GARDEN PROJECT No. 104-24000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No. 11 OF 12 NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT z R W FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z- ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na F Autrey, A. J. Res 18 59 Ryan Southeast 120 7.39 886.80 540.00 2532 Glencrest Ellis, J. Merida and Ruth C. Ind. Tract 1 A. Stinson 630 7.39 4,655.70 4-,655.70 3101 S. Riverside DrI_ve Survey Ga Jones, Penelope M. Res. 19 59 Ryan Southeast 120 7.39 886.80 540.00 15552 Van Owen, Apt. 7 H Van Nuys, California e-4 H z H Mount Rose Baptist Church Res. 19 58 to 120 7.39 886.80 540.00 2864 Mississippi U Ryan Properties, Inc. Comm . 18 58 of 120 7.39 886.80 886.80 301 E.5th Street 1,110 8,202.90 7,162.50 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF BRYAN STREET FROM BERRY STREET TO 380' NORTH PROJECT No. 10424000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No.12 OF 12 q NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT z W FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER Z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER ~ LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na Doorco, Inc, Ind. 20 & S.20' 30 Ryan & Pruitt 70 8.43 590.10 590.10 Yes 1110 E. Bowie of 21 Harris, Tom M. Ind. 14 30 of 50 8.43 421.50 421.50 No 417 S. Madison Eldorado, Arkansas Ironco, Inc. Ind. 15 30 to 50 8.43 421.50 310.50 Yes 3038 Bryan Avenue Kerr McGee Corporation Ind. 1 thru 8 29 " 310 8.43 2,613.30 2,613.30 No Kerr McGee Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Moore, Fred I. Ind. N.10' of 13 30 " 10 8.43 84.30 -0- No 609 Norwood Street Reed, Russell M. nd. 16 30 50 8.43 421.50 310.50 Yes 5509 Wheaton Drive Reed, Rusaell M. Ind. 17 30 " 50 8.43 421.50 310.50 Yes 5509 Wheaton Drive Thomas, Frankie L. Ind. 18 30 50 8.43 421.50 310.50 Yes c/o University State Bank P.O. Box 11280 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF BRYAN STREET FROM BEAKY STREET TO 380' NORTH PROJECT No. 104-74000-150 A.P. 66-166 UNIT No. 12 OF 12 z A NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED o0 OF APPARENT OWNER p FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER 0H na LOT OLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na Thomas, Frankie L. Ind 19 30 Ryan & Pruitt 50 8.43 421,50 310.50 Yes c/o University State Barak P.O. Box 11280 690 59816.70 5.,177.40 v F" v � 1 City of Fort Worth, Texas aAeMN'NN Mayor and Council Communication ovipws RAt1lW1 DATE REFERENCE _-] SUBJECT: Assessment Paving on the PAGE NUMBER R 2 6 C-757 South Side, Project 150 1 of Council action on the project described below is requested: Project Description Nature of work: Assessment Paving at 12 Locations, South Side as follows: UNIT STREET LIMITS WIDTH R.O.W. 1 Daggett Avenue Williams to New York 30 feet 50 feet 2 Williams Street Stella to Broadway 30 feet 50 feet 3 Williams Street Broadway to Daggett 30 feet 50 feet 4 W. Richmond Ave. May to St. Louis 30 feet 60 feet 5 E. Richmond Ave. Riverside Drive to Renner 30 feet 50 feet 6 Renner Avenue E. Richmond to Riverside Dr. 30 feet 50 feet 7 McCurdy Street E. Richmond to Elmwood 30 feet 50 feet 8 McCurdy Street Elmwood to 95' North 30 feet 50 feet 9 E. Richmond Ave. McCurdy to Uvalde 30 feet 60 feet 10 E. Richmond Ave. Uvalde to Jessie 30 feet 60 feet 11 Mississippi Ave. Baker to Glen Garden 34 feet 60 feet 12 Bryan Street Berry St. to 380' North 40 feet 60 feet Petitions have been received for the paving of the above streets with the exception of Units 8 and 11. These units were initiated by the City to provide for continuous paving and better flow of traffic in the area. The City is presently negotiating with the two concerned property owners for the acquisition of additional right-of-way to permit the construction of a cul-de-sac at the dead-end on Bryan Street. Submission of Bids BIDDER AMOUNT BID WORKING DAYS R. W. Gibbins, Inc. $64,512.55 76 Texas Bitulithic Co. 65,903.20 76 S.R.O. Asphalt, Inc. 66,564.05 76 General Construction Co. 69,097.75 76 Glade Construction Co. 69,736.41 76 Worth Construction Co. 74,652.50 76 Project Cost and Financing ` Based on the low bid, approximately $43,262.04 wi ADM against abutting property owners. The cost to th * iy� i will be approximately $27,701.76 including engine ri cellaneous expenses. �1- :13R��1, ]GA. DATERUMBEREFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving on the PAGE 7/25/66 N C-757 South Side, Project 150 2 & 2 Recommendations 1) That the following Bond Fund Transfers be approved: AMOUNT FROM TO PURPOSE $43,262.04 Revolving Fund 12 Locations South Property owners ' portion Side 042-10424-150 of construction $27,701.76 Unspecified 12 Locations South City's portion of construc- 042-10424-901 Side 042-10424-150 tion and engineering 2) That an ordinance be adopted: a. Declaring the necessity for and ordering the improvements; b. Making provisions for levying of assessments; c. Ordering the Public Works Department to prepare estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; d. Awarding the contract to R. W. Gibbins, Inc. on its low bid of $64,512.55; and, e. Making appropriations to cover the indebtedness thereby in- curred for improvements to the project named above. 3) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Approving the estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; and, b) Setting August 15, 1966, as the date of the Benefit Hearing. JLB:lp The following summaries are attached: "A" - Resume of the paving project "B" - Distribution of cost and assessments, and results of Post Card Survey "C" - Assessment Rolls in alphabetical order lift � wo SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSITIO BY COUNCIL: 0 1 C& CESSYY PROVED OTHER (DESCRIBE) CITY SECRETARY DATE CITY MANAGER _ �� _ �� �� 25 1966