Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4536 OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY f T. WORTH, TEX. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE "nDING ORDINANCE N0. 3011, BEING AN ORDINANCE TO REGULATE AND RESTRICT THE LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, AND LAND FOR TRADE, INDUSTRY, RESIDENCE, OR OTHER PURPOSE'S, THE HEIGHT, NUMBER OF STORM AND SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES, THE SIZE OF YARDS AND OTHER OPEN SPACES, OFF-STREST PARKING AND LOADING AND THE DENSITY OF POPULATION; AND FOR SAID PURPOSES TO DIVIDE THE MUNICIPALITY INTO DISTRICTS OF SUCH NUMBERS SHAPE AND AREA AS MAY BE DEEKED BEST BY FIXING DEFINITE USES OF THE BUILDINGS HEREINAFTER ERECTED IN SAID DESCRIBED AREAS FROM THE USES AS SHOWN ON THE MAPS CONTAINED IN SAID ORDINANCE NO. 3011; PRESCRIBING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN $5.00 NOR MORE THAN $200.00 FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND THAT EACH DAY THAT A VIOLATION IS PERMITTED TO EXIST SHALL CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE OFFENSE; AND NAMING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS: SECTIONd 1. That Ordinance No. 3011 be amended so that the following described uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered„ changed and amended as follows to wit: AREAS FROM TO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No. 61-243: The residue of Tract 4-D and the residue of Tract 5 (City Tax Records) J. E. Brandon Survey ago "Ea (Approximately 6500 block of Meadowbrook Drive) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No. 61-Z-84: The residue of Lot 1, Block 6-2; San Roe Addition. "B" "E" (4100 block of Burton Street at Miller Street) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No. 61-Z-87: Lots 8 and 99 Block 210 Prospect Heights Addition "B" WE (3000 block Lubbock) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No. 61-Z-88: The South 99 Feet of Lot 8, and the South 99 Feet of the West 25 Feet of Lot 9, Block A, Shaw-Clarke Addition "B" "E-R" (1200 block West Berry Street) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ® a NO. 61—Z-89: Tract 2-A (City Tax Records), Thomas White Survey "J" "K" (Approximately 3400 block Harley - South side of street) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No. 61Z-90t Lots 3-41, 3-B and 340 Marler Subdivision "B" "E" (4100 block Miller Street) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No. 61-Z-91t Lots L and M, Block 6; Crestland 2nd Filing nAn nn (4351 and 4355 Frazier Avenue) — - - - - - — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — No. Ll— Tract 8—G of the C. T. Hillard Survey "An "F-Ra (4600 block of Miller) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P No. 61 Z_93: The South 2435 feet of Tract 6 and the East 128 feet of the South 1435 feet of Tract 6-B (City Tax Records) G. Herrera Survey - (less right-of-way for Victorian and Chateau Streets) "An & nBn WE" (Approximately 7300 thrn 7900 blocks of U. S. Higbmy 81 South) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -No. 61-Z-96: Lot A, Block 1, Joe Williams Subdivision of Haan Heights Addition "B" "E" (4351 Sandage) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �No. -Z-98: Lots 9 through 12, Block 22, and Lots 2 through 41, Block 15, "A" to "C R"; Lots 1 through 4, Block 22, Lots 1 through 12, Block 21, Lots 1 through 10, Block 18, and Lot 1, Block 15, "A" to "D"; Lot By Block 220 "A" to "E"; all as shown on a preliminary plat of Meadowbrook Hills, 6th Filing, out of Tracts 1-H and 1-G (City Tax Records) of the Wm. J. Baker Survey, received by the City Planning Department on September 6, 1961 "A" "C-RK "D" & "E" (Approximately 5400 through 6200 blocks Ederville Road) SECTION 2. The zoning regulations and districts, as herein establisheds, have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals, and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, parks and other public requirements. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the coumnity. SECTION 3, This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Fort Worth affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinanoe. SECTION 4. Should any section, clause or provision of this ordinance be declared by the Court to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or am part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid. SECTION 5, Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, amrits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not less than Five and No/100 Dollars ($5.00) nor more than Two Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($200.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6, This Ordinance will take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. APPROVED AS TO FOIN AND LEGALITYs CITY ATTORNEY Adopted: &_�[ OWN. N , •\�. •\� O �� \��W � • \� � g -,-0 OR WASPOWN Ad IMMON "al mv, a NIK MIN\d pp, BONN,, am �`\gmw w \ Y. � ��� M ti • /0-A g 10 1`D I-C 23 22 21 20 19 18 F028E5 SST. 2 3 4 i 5 G 1 8 1 1 12 13 1 A 2-k 3 « Q -9 10 y Il 4-A ' iS lb 18 19 yp 10 9 8 _ 29 �5 4- 6 28 ,� •, 2 7 2 G 2 S 2 4 23-R 22�R BUETON 1 ' 05-R i ! ST 26 25 �24 23 22 21 •9 a • r 2 3 ¢ s 6 7-e a-R 410 - .,,� • 1 p" 9-A 5 + 3 E — 2 2o 19 18 17 l6• ;S 12 13 rs TAP-2ANT 4f0a - 300 , D. ti V O �•.� � w r - 5 r_ 7 8 9 10 Ld .D O =c LL ,rn O " LIJ ► z D Qc ; CD ' Tr, 16 B � Z8 LL1 v ON -- ; L11 -, A ; LL 2? 12 1 NO 61 84 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM "B" TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "E" COMMERCIAL 4100 BLK. BURTW4 ST MILLER 5T. 1 EAST Recommended --------- Petitioner* w• A. PHILLIPS _ __-_ Percents 600/0 Denied-.,.-..---.--- ❑ Percentage of Area Postponed_____._.____ Scale , \,"= 120—Map No �� Remarks: DECISION PpSTPONED AUGUST 1S,19G1 Hearing Date: .SEAT. 19,19�► Page No. Q Q BOWIE. 24 2 `3 t 23. -- 9 W 9 3 22 3 22: o s p Y — -- _— �� in• t9 • G t9 14 4 4 ►� W 4 �c d E -� l0 16 • b :Is U) a II 2 • -• — 2�^� !I 14-• !! 4 \NEST BF-RRY 23 Z ,� 14 z 4. 12 y� 4 �_�_. 4 3 Rol 2 I 10 r 2 I t .- 9 N061 - Z- 87 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM "B" TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO"E R" RESTRICTED COMMF—V CIAL 1 3000 SLK. LUBBOCK AVE. SOUTNWESZ' Recommended ......... Petitioner E. A. NIPPOLD 7 Percentage of Area : Postponed--------------D Scale . C'= 200 Map No: r-2, Remarks' Hearing Date: SEPT. 19,196 1 Page No._4 3 4. 9r Q• � 19 ?rb 001 f t�I • 11 ut 13 W E ST BER Y I If no ji 2 3 A 'N f 1 .E.B 'o 1 E 24 rI fy! r^ 1 VI f W Or� I • • • 4 4, ! ZI ! 1 2 3 5 d. & 1 0 �% ld �q • 3 20 _ f „� g« _ • G Iq � Q � _ � 18 / 11 1 \e� \G 1514 1t 12 11 10 8 8 11 u • `�,r 20 i� oil W. Q wLli � ro 15 -T ,► 11 14 3 4 S G B 10 ' --._.—-- `� 12 12 _ }3 O'EVITT N061 - Z- 88 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM "g" TWO 1=AMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL 7 + IZOO 5LK. W. BERRY ST. SOUTH Recommended _________[ Petitioner GLEN C. W GOUIRK Denied,--.--.-.-.___-_D Percentage of Area : GG% Postponed.............. Scale : 1'*- 202 Map No: 7G 7 Remarks: Hearing Date: SEPT. t9, 19G1 Page No. S r ------, I " •'�" -- '.G µ p4; GgRA`=� � VeEI-10IF-TTE C� r y 11l � __� 1�• Tra_A OUZI! n y •Tr- -C Z r do r� N0610OZ- 89 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM 'J" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO "K" HEAVY INDUSTRIAL APPROX. 3400 6LK. HARLEY AVE. WEST Recommended ---------(R/ Petitioner STANDARD PAVING CO- Denied- aDenied __-.---D Percentage of Area : 7 % Postponed______________D Scale : V=4(30_Map No: 901 Remarks: Hearing Date: SEPT. Page No.-,- G _ ' GUY E. VANCt; -- --1 q 48 3 �; Qt1al5 L,1►�tE 1 n ' 6-�— – ----� 24 2 zs to z3 5P3 24 9 • N ' Z2 + U —_ ,4 B 7 7R 1.9.6 . T�.1$•S 6 13� ,, •' • rs 7 20 • g � • � i6 g 19 � 3 W IIS W O I 10 ►� .� a: k5 J J 2 2-- �` �✓ 2 -� Is � 11 l� • I of _�., I VV Q .E, 14 ►+ p+�r, Mlalet bCWAN ST25 14 C 3 t a e f 9 0 4 5 6 C YTON 5 , r --- 'R It•R z } , T- Sklu �1. u �n Zz z1 ,9 it ADD. '-- — -- As-a +' CHLDFESS 5T. N0616mZom90 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.. TO "E-" COMMERCIAL 4100 $LK. MILLER ST. SOUTH E AST i ,,/ MR. H.F. BREWER � Recommended---------5( Petitioner: MRS. ROYE E- BREALK Denied___... Percentage of Area : c8Ca Postponed--------------0 - Scale : r�= 200 Map No: 66 Remarks Hearing Date: SEPT 11,11G.1 Page No. k b I li a y 13 r 7 �� � 7 1b 12 8-C 4e 8 9 10 9 A Io f z f q' 3 42 i Tf•-2 ©E W C gyp,, 9 110 • j • E a. 4F \JV. SEMINARY DRIVE k r fl00 i G 1 • J G E I A fa •25 � _ _ w r • • C 1 Q�• 29ui let R • 1 1 j I,� V ' BROADUS ST. E7 U) f 4 tt zb > g I" W @ s 21 25 3 zc pC ' W SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL �� � SEM 1i�ARY 22. Gi 9 (L 4 0 61 s. Z o. 9 N l PROPOSED CHANGE FROM "A' ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "E" COMMERCIAL. 43161- SS FRAZIER AVE. Sour H Recommended ......... Petitioner:�• K. I.EANpER Percentage of Area : Postponed--------------0 Scale . I'%=200 Map No: 75 Remarks: Hearing Date SEPT. 14044 Page No.-BL-.T Mw CHICKASAW AveI-P, I 4t 3-R 4-R s 7 8 9110 / zt .5 T516 J . 1 rR 22 J ' LA 3 11 i8 19 12 zt t2 z3 24 25 zG ' 4000 HOWARD STREET 17 } 7 10 1( 12 • 1 • • „Aw • 0 } I In ' PIERCE g-E 5T. r g-� Q9 f 5 • I ; Q ' 1, , . A• V1�. S. . „ w . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1.) 10 11 I5 h --- - - KNOX _ K �E E A - 'Q. 1 2 3 4 5 (. '1 8 9 10 11 d FAIRLANE E.� 1 N061 - Z- 92 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM "A" ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL O "F-R" RESTRIC-TLO COMMERCIAL 4600 BLK.. MILLER .ST. SOUTHEAS-T Recommended_-------- Petitioner: AARON RASNTI Denied................. Percentage of Area :— Postponed-------------J3 rea :Postponed-------------J3 Scale : "*= Zoo Map No: er' Remarks: Hearing Date SEPT, ►9,tg6t Page No.... T.... 1 • TJul , G A ; 4 s t SG H /J� �� 1� �3 °- ,.. ►� r- .� zo �, ,:SOB" ,.�� 4 1` s z 1 11 12 13 4R A. IG Q�T nri `t".' it 9 � 1 _J_ ✓ i 1 Grp �S 4 ! t 1 9- -8 T u1 J'q-. 14 ' 16 id'. tR 1.KuQ13 Yif, i T t.2 LY ` Tt•�C �. SYCAU0P,E TIt-a • 6UR. M p C.0-T-7 i 0 �V�SON N061 - Z0093 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM "A'ONE_ FAMILY C '-TWO FAMILY RES. Tp "V' CpMMERCIAL � 7300 i-hvu 7400 N.S. FREE-WAY S O LJ"t'H Recommended Petitioner: HALL"ARK DEV, Cc- Denied. _ � Percentage of Area : 92%W Postponed-_____________Q Scale 1'"241)(2—Map No: 127, t EXCEPT TVAS NOR TN IIQ' Remarks Hearing Date: SEPT 19, 1961 Page No. 1n. i 17 PM le Ljr 33 8 � I 33 i g --- --- C 7 It Q 9 1 �• ! �� 111 I 3'' e 1• a Upas IQ �— ss 5 3(. 5 W —I ------- w 11 37 4 17 4 4 E� 3 3 38 �h. J C3 T a0 1 T�40 • , WEST S EM1tvARY } 'D ' • I L ——9 E' � r • C ui cc � g• , G • � l- I ra• 1 � In Z, s7 z ( J G z 5 s 2c e 23 1 n N061dmZ4m96 ., ,. PROPOSED CHANGE FROM B TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO S COMMERCIAL. f � 4551 S P NW3AGE AVE. sou-r%4 Recommended__._..._-E Petitioner- 1308g1E L.M c DUFF Denied--------------.-.-0 Percentage of Area : 730/0 Postponed..............0 Scale 1"2222 Map No: G3 .� Remarks: Hearing Date: SEPT. 1921961 Page No.-J.5— l� N WARP,IyG�-� o ITs TV. 1 s3 - CA 8 v it l0 Iq 4: m ADou� aRoOK ILLS �o G•� F1l1NU r • = =- - = 0 i �°S,,71,- IV61Z98 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM 'W ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "C'+"D APARTMEyA-rVE'' COMMERCIAL. APPROX. 5400 tk►u C200 %LKS. EDERVILLS RD. E AST Recommended .__-_.-.- Petitioner: JAC1K E. .129"Ow Percentage of Area : 9216 Postponed-------------- Scale : 1-= 400 Mop No: b,14 Remarks: Hearing Date: .SEPT. 19, 1961 Page No. —is_ 3