Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4938 FRWORTH, !CDPD ORDINANCE N0. y �� CITY SECRETARY TEX. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3011, BEING AN ORDINANCE TO REGULATE AND RESTRICT THE LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, AND LAND FOR TRADE, INDUSTRY, RESIDENCE, OR OTHER PURPOSES, THE HEIGHT, NUMBER OF STORIES AND SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES, THE SIZE OF YARDS AND OTHER OPEN SPACES, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING AND THE DENSITY OF POPULATION; AND FOR SAID PURPOSES TO DIVIDE THE MUNICIPALITY INTO DISTRICTS OF SUCH NUMBER, SHAPE AND AREA AS MAY BE DEEMED BEST BY FIRING DEFINITE USES OF THEBUILDINGS HEREINAFTER ERECTED IN SAID DESCRIBED AREAS FROM THE USES AS SHOWN ON THE MAPS CONTAINED IN SAID ORDINANCE NO. 3011; PRESCRIBING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN $5.00 NOR MORE THAN $200.00 FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND THAT EACH DAY THAT A VIOLATION IS PERMITTED TO EXIST SHALL CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE OFFENSE; AND NAMING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, 'TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance N 0. 3011 be amended so that the following described uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as follows to wit: AREAS FROM TO No. 63-Z-54: Lots 1, 2, 3, 24, 25, 26, Corbell Addition "B" "C" (1008-16 Sylvania Park Dr. and 1009-17 Beach St. West) ----------fir ------------M��--------------------------------------- --------- No. 63-Z-57: Lots 8 & 9, Block 5, Sylvan Crest Addition, "B" except that portion in the right-of-way for Highway 121. (700 & 704 Harper St. - Northeast corner Harper & Race St.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No. 63-Z-59: Lots 19 thru 23, Block 6, Ryan and Pruitt "B" "E" Addition (2700 thru 2716 S. Pecan Street) No. 63-Z-60: All of Tract D, Westover Ridge Addition "A" "D" That portion of Tracts B, C & E, Westover "A" "F-R" Ridge Addition, not now zoned "F-R" Restricted Commercial (6100 & 6200 Blocks of Pershing Ave. @ Taxco Rd.) No. 63-Z-63: Lots 15 thru 20, Block 107, Arlington Heights "B" "C" Addition, 1st Filing (5429-37 Birchman) No. 63-Z-65: Lots 2,. 3, 4, A, B, and C, Block 2; Lot 2, "B" "E" Block 3; Sandy Land Addition; and the residue of Tract 2, (City Tax Records) L. G. Tinsley Survey. Lots 5, 6, 7, Block 2, Sandy Land Addition "E-R" "E" (1300 Block Harper Street and 3900 Block Wheeler Street) -----------------------------------------------------------------�.M�M�.�-- No. 63-Z-68: All of Tract 3-A-1 (City Tax Records) E. S. "I" "G" Harris Survey and Tract 2 (City Tax Records) Adam Voght Survey - less any portions that are in Forest Park and right-of-way of University Drive, being more fully described as follows: Being a tract or parcel of land out of the E. S. Harris and Adam Voght Surveys situated in Tarrant County, Texas, and described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a concrete monument standing in the line between the Adam Voght and said E. S. Harris Survey and 2046.1 feet from the corner which is the Northwest corner of the E. S. Harris Survey, said monument being marked " T & P Ry. ;11 THENCE north 4 degrees 30 minutes West 67 feet to another concrete monument; THENCE North 58 degrees 49 minutes East 525 feet; THENCE South 4 degrees 00 minutes East 88 feet; THENCE South 25 degrees 37 minutes West 440 feet; THENCE South 21 degrees 00 minutes East passing at 62.3 feet the West line of Old University Drive, in all 172 feet to a point in the East line of said Old University Drive; THENCE South 26 degrees 13 minutes West along said East line of Old University Drive 398.8 feet to the point of beginning of the tract herein described: THENCE Southerly along the East line of said Old University Drive and the East line of New University Drive; South 26 degrees 13 minutes West 111.7 feet; South 25 degrees 25 minutes West 50 feet; South 23 degrees 51 minutes West 50 feet; South 22 degrees 17 minutes West 50 feet; South 20 degrees 43 minutes West 50 feet; South 19 degrees 09 minutes West 50 feet; South 17 degrees 35 minutes West 50 feet; South 16 degrees O1 minutes West 50 feet; South 14 degrees SECTION 2. The zoning regulations and districts, as herein established, have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals, and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, parks and other public requirements. They have been made after a full and complete public hearing with reasonable considera- tion, among other things, of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Fort Worth affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 4. Should any section, clause or provision of this ordinance be declared by the court to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid. SECTION 5. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not less than Five and No/100 Dollars ($5.00) nor more than Two Hundred and No/100 ($200.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6. This Ordinance will take effect and be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY Adopted: ',k- /z�), /IC' CITY OF FORT WORTH ZONING COMMISSION HEARING JUNE 189, 1963 1 : 30 PM . CITY COUNCIL HEARING JULY 15, 1963 Area of requested change woo 12 11 10 3 2 I 13 14 15 16 ITr 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Petitioners property 12 It 10 ': : 3 2 1walPresent zoning classification E 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 200 ft. Radius 12 11 10 ` , ` 3 2 Signers of petition 3 SCALE: I"= 200' UNLESS NOTED , TOP OF MAP IS NORTH UNLESS NOTED r �� INDtCA'tES PAGE 1dUMbER OF DOCKF.'� 2 D 7�e', /•.• T- I J — — --ri t -• •�ill..._._ �� 6. ��� �. �.I;.IIA�.�— ;, of 1 ' 11 Zl + ' It r.r."IERAi 1.0('AT`1Uti `lw, of f'f1Qt'f)`.;1 f' (.'HA"rt'fi t'+ ZON I (", Cl ASS 11-TCATION, i FOR kil-TT["ir, OF JUNE 15, 1961 F i gyp. O Tc.%_ \ 1 Y 8 8 14 cS. O N ( N% v SAI A 5 2 C 1 _A t 5 _ 8- O Tr.SoA F WHEELER_ - 5T. 2 n— C 7 1 2 3 �1 � ,o G F e a - 13 6 e F 13 12 - - -- �(/' y Tr. 55-, Tr.5!o Y Q FF 11' i b s _. _ w o -re 27ell V' v. 1� e4� ?3e Q it, i's- 220 � — --- Tr. S !, C f 8 J �(�. tl j 0 \ o V) Z1 9W 18_T 2 O 1>I tom !�_-;;j SYLVAN 1 CREST E ADD. O N063 - Z - 54 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM "B" TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "C," APARTMENT 1008-1(c SYLVANIA PARK DR. AND 1009-17 BEACH ST. WEST NORTHEAST Recommended .........B/ Petitioner: GENE NAMES Denied-__.....___0 Percentage of Area : 85 ofo Poatponed..............[I Scole : I" = 200 Map No: 25 Remarks: Hearing Date: JUNE IS, 19GS Page No. 2, RECOMMENDED: Request of Gene Hames, 1008-16 Sylvania Park Drive and 1009-17 Beach St. West, from "B" Two Family Residential to "C" Apartment, I. 8 Notices of hearing were mailed. 1 Person appeared in favor of the change. 0 Persons appeared in opposition to the change. II. Yw- . Gene Hames was present in favor of the change and made the following statements 1. The property faces commercially zoned property to the east along Beach St. and Sylvania Park on the west. 2. If the change is approved, he proposes to construct apartnent buildings fronting on a private court which will extend thru the center of the area from Beach St. West to Sylvania Park Dr. 3, Sylvania Park DriTre is a public dedicated street, not a park drive. 4. The property is not suited fcr development under the present zoning. SUMMARY: The change is desirable as multiple-family dwellings at this location would be suitable development adjoining commercial property along Beach St. while providing desirable development adjoining the park which should be utilized for residents of the area. Commercial development adjoining parks defeats the purpose of a park. VOTE ON MOTION TO RECOM2ND: 7 AYES 0 NOES 2 ABSENT NO. 63-Z-54 t i%• ,lam O Tr. 9 O MAURICE ST. Tr. 2 04 -- —- J• I 1 2 3 ST� f i ci Tr. I I y. ) E Tr 205-13j Tr 8 i E MPR K Z 4 0 E i 3-& W r. 39. • • O 31 30 E- / I 2 3 4 —_ W To. I0 A 29 Tr. 13 Tr. 14 r_, , 13 OC 1 28 •- ?06A 14 12. Z7 I '7 �v U co - iW� _ V4 d 15 `nl Z(o I o boa � �' � � © k3 LLJ o o N 63 - Z -s5 ? PROPOSED CHANGE FROM '.8" TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "E " COMMERCIAL 700-04 HARPER NORTHEAST Recommended.........Q/ Petitioner: TEXAS LAND t INV X0. Denied­.....­-­.A] •810/ Percentage of Area : 0 9 _ Post oned_._-_.. 0 1'' =200' 25-7 D •------ Scale : Mop No: Remarks 26-3 Hearing Date: JUNE la. 1963 Pape No. 5 i. P.ECCW ENDED: Request of Texas Land & Investment Co., 700-04 Harper St., from "B" Two-Family Residential to "E" Commercial. I, 11.E Notices of hearing were mailed, 1 Person appeared in favor of the change. 0 Persons appeared in opposition to the change. Il. Mr. Charles 71ebster, repvesenting Texas Land and Investment Co., was present and made the following statements in favor of the change. 1. This property is under the same ownership as a larger area adjoining on the east, now zoned commercial, fronting on Beach Street, and having Highway 121 on the north and Race St. on the south. 2. The best use of the land could be made by combining it with the tract to the east and developing all as one uses Altho their plans are incomplete at present, it is not desirable residential property and any development is of commercial nature, SUMMARY: The property is undesirable and impractical f or development under the present zoning. Developing it as part of a larger tract of VOL commercial property will permit more desirable development for the area, tending to permit it�F, utilization to best advantage, thus stabilizing values for the area. VOTE ON MOTION TO RECOMEND: 7 AYES 0 NOES 2 ABSENT NO. 63-Z-57 .r 2 ` O G 9 8 9 1 10 11 I ►2 13 t 3 4 S ( 7 . .8 9 �1n1 11 It N 24 23 12 21 20 19 ►��l?� 14 I Ira 114 15 i23 22 21 20 ►4 i 1B 1? IG -- — - --- ; �` r-_, C OLV 1 N C O Lv1'1.t -.T- - o ►2 ►j 4. 1 2�¢ Q b ? 8 9 10 tt ►1 to 3: 1 5 b 1 8 9 10 i ►1 ( cli Al w L T to I i Z 2 3 ?2 21 20 24 23 22 2t 20 I 1 l8 ►T 11G 1% 14 43 M ORNING 40a 43 2 23— r • 2 �; c , 9 qa 11 J2 ►3 t16 4. a0 % 20 5 f IJ20 L714 ' �►6 t1 IG I9 W 6 14 �j f ►o F3 O F3 �� g Ig • U�j ` J VDD 5T. t7 8 10 11 11 15 :lpIG q 9I e10� 1 a II E 14`.0 12 !3 24L_23 12 21 2e 11 18 11 iL EAST C A NT EY s _ EAST CANTE10E.Y 24 I 1 — --- _—_ __ Q—T-7 —---T-- 24 _ 14 F3 j 2 x:123 _ 3 b � ►1it2It3I _ --- 0C ts1 Q I i 2Z d 3 22 3 22 Z ZI 4 21 4--- 7-_-21 ' 25124 23122 21 20 19 i IA r.� J I .� N063 - Z - 59 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM '•5" TWO FNMIL`( RESIDENTIAL TO ..E.. COMMERCIAl- ,L700 thr4 2?IG S. PECNN Q.l , Recommended._...._.. Petitioner: 1AORNING5IDE BAPT CK. Denied_......__..__.....D Percentage of Area : 69% - Postponed..............0 Scale : 100 Map No: 35-2;35-c Remarks: Mooring Date: sS UNE 180'"o—S Pogo'No. . s RECOMEMDED: Request of Morningside Baptist Church, 2700 thru 2716 S. Pecan., from "B" Two—Fardly Residential to "E" Commercial. 1. 35 Notices of hearing were mailed. 2 Persons were present in favor of the change, 0 Persons were present in opposition to the change. ITS Rev. A.A. Edmonson, Pastor, and !,r. J.E. Box, Jr., 7217 Brooks, -were present and made the following statements in favor of the change: 1. Due to the changing character of the area from white to blsck, the congregation of the church no longer live in this area, there has been little if any growth in the church membership in the past 2 years and they, like all churches, wish to grow. 2. The church would "Like to move to a new location but must sell the present property. 3. Under present zoning, the only sale po,sible is to a negro church and those interested in buying it are unable to pay full value for the property. 4. Other uses for which the building could be used are funeral home and club, both of which require a change in zoning. SUNMARY: The proposed change is compatible with existing and future use of the area as indicated by a preliminary study. VOTE ON MOTION TO RECaMMEND: 5 AYES 2 NOES 2 ABSENT No. 63-z-59 d rE 0 O , eo - ' C -014 40 to 1 O :fl g;gaso\ON ISM" \ Q� l\ �\ ••,• 111,10 \, o x1 —..��. lk • � '•iii: i v' N • 1 . • N063 � Zaw60 PROPOSED . , • \ VC.ZOO • . . EE.C, • a Percentageof . • 55:s T r • • . • ' , Map No: HearingRemarks: P Date: 6 w t RECOM ENDED: Request by EX.Thorp by Richard Simon, Sr., 6100 and 6200 Blocks Pershing Ave., from "A" One-Family Residential to "D" Apartment and "F-R" Restricted Commercial. (The original petition covered a change to "F-R" Restricted Commercial for all of the property but, at the public hearing, the petitioner agreed to "D" Apartment for Tract D) Mr. Leland Hodges, due to personal interests, disqualified himself from participating in the discussion or voting on this petition. 1. 7 Notices of hearing were mailed. 2 Persons were present in favor of the change. 5 Persons were present in opposition to the charge. II,, 11r. Richard U. Simon, Sr., attorney representing Mr. Thorp, and Mr. EX.Thorp were present and made the following statements in favor of the change: 1. The property along Convair Access R& is now zoned "F-R" Restricted Commercial, the balance of the property is zoned "A" 1-Family Residential. 2. Until approximately " year ago, the property was all in 1 tract, at that time a portion was s;-.Id to the Catholic Diocese to permit construction of a church and school. 3. In order to sell property to the church, the owner was required to plat the property and ded".cate streets. The platting leaves a narrow strip of "A" 1-Family Resi .ential zoning along the south side of Pershing Ave. backing against the "F-R" Commercial zoning, It is impractical to develop this strip with homes. 4. There is no access to the property from Convair Access Rd. on the south. Access is from Guilford Rd, or Taxco Rd. on the east and west. Therefore, it is important that the commercially zoned property have access from Pershing Ave. 5. The propertir adjoining this on the west is zoned "F-R" restricted Commercial and extends north of the north boundary of this property. This will penalize lir. Thorp in his development unless his property has the same zoning. 6. A filling station site is located on Convair Access Rd. but before proceeding with further development of t.. e property, lir. Thorp wishes to have the zoning established which will aid in a plan for all of the property. 7. After the discussion, the petitioner agreed to accept "D" Apartment zoning on Tract D, ' estover Ridge., which adjoins "A" One-Family Residential zoning on the north 8. Any statement made by Mr. Rice Tilley at the time of the original zoning does not concern the present ovmer as he was not a party to any such statements. III. Mr. Robert Stahala, 200 Houston, representing Ridgmar Development Co; and hr. Scbtt C. Baum, Jr., Texas Crude Oil Co., 2601 hi.,dgmar Plaza, made the following statements in opposition to the change. Other persons opposed did not speak nor advise their names. 1. At the time the "F-R" Commercial zonirg was established on the property along Convair Access Rd. and the Leonard property west of this, the owner of the property now owned by hr. Thorp asked for 300 ft. along Convair Access Rd. to carry commercial designation. A street was to be dedicated west from Guilford Rd� with residential uses on both sides = of it to serve as a buffer bdt-ween the commercial and other residential property north of this , (Cont 'id next page) i (63-Z-60 Cont Id) 2. The Leonard interests have deed restrictions on their property zoned "F-R" adjoining I1r, Ihorp's, limiting its use to apartment or office buildings„ The tailding setbacks, landscaping and other protective covenants are in excess of those required by the City. 3. Residential proper;,y north of this in Westover Hills has a ainimum requirement for house construction of x50,000 exclusive of land cost and landscaping It is unfair to those home owners tc place commercial zoning on property adjoining or abutting their horses. 4. As there is no access to the property proposed for change, from Convair Access R&, the traffic thru residential areas will be a problem and could result in loss of value in those areas. 5. Investments in any properties are safe-guarded thru zoning of adjacent property and there has been no change in this area since the original �* zoning was established which would justify the proposed change. SUMRY: The proposed change is compatible with existing zoning and proposed development of the area, It will permit the highest and best use of the property. VOTE ON MOTION TO RECOMMEND: 5 AYES 1 NO �► 2 ABSENT 1 NOT VOTING NO. 63-Z-60 [ h 1114 131 u 10 l e i f.154-132 1 2019 16 11i1L 1 4413 I2 It 10 1 1911115 4 TI2 1 2 11 181111114.1% u 1 13 1tzl 1 8 ? c T T to i 1 2'► 1 O 31 1 30 I 7123 2S2�I2T'it9 �►3 'Jl t SbJj',s PERSHIty 640o f NN/ 1 i f I 191 171L► 14131211 0Soo 00 9 611 L S 4 3 2 i 141 i 9 8 7 4 3 1 1 20 It%a 111101 1 12%1 9 a7 4 943 T T 1 �I •` g 1 2 2 29 1 3 3 3i S 21122113 521 4p0I31 2 3 4 7 1 2 3 1!p 3 T F31RCIriMA. AVE. o^ o I 119 1111 114 1211111 9 'T 4321 111 Willi1111109 81 54 '32 t 0 I 13 1 O A µ i Q � ••I•• a N �11 v I - TT Twli- F ( •I•• ••r,...\••••• IF as G 3L�7 4 � 16 324 5`24:!'211 t 3 ' j® 2L 1 t 2 a CAI. MONY (( `Q CLL 013 TC 1151413IiHlo 54!31 1 �� � 7 11VG 9 P. 11 16 1? Ii Ig 1'3112 r1 t f 8 , 5 4 TFps 5So i 43a1 Li� F zc.. �• a a E-'KPRE55WAk`f 45 141 E - E N063ltIIIIIIIIIlZew63 T PROPOSED CHANGE FROM N$" -rWO FAM11.,Y RE.SIDENTIM_ TO �C" APARTMENT 1 5429- 37 PS111CNMAN AVE. 1 WEST Recommended.........6d� Petitioner: CI-IARLES ARNO�D Oenied..................0 Percentage of Area : Postponed.............11 Scale : 1"23-00 Map No: 3.- 1 Remarks' k Hearing Date:__ Page No. I.Je,_, 1 r NECOMIENDED: Request of Charles Arnold, 5429-37 Birchman Ave., from "B" lWo-Family Residential to 'IC" Apartment. I. 22 Notices of hearing were mailed. 1 Person was present in favor of the change. 0 Persons were present in opposition to the change. .. !I. Bir. Charles Arnold was ,present and made the following statements in favor of the change. 1. The property immediately south, along Camp Bovrie, is zoned 'IF" Commercial. 2. There is a dance club immediately adjoining the rear of the property. 3. It is no longer desirable for residential use. 4. If the change is approved, it is proposed to construct garden-type apartments having 1 or 2 bedrooms, renting for yp100 to w0125 per month. 5. The proposed use will provide a buffer between commercial and residential zoning and enhance values in the area. SUMARY: The proposed charge is desirable in that it will permit development of the property, prcviding a buffer district between existing residential uses to the north and the commercial uses and traffic on Camp BCWie - Convair Access Rd. to the south, tending to stabilize values. COTE ON MOTION TO RECOMEND: 7 AYES ow 0 NOES 2 ABSENT NO. 63—Z-63 1W no it PRIMROSE ST. ' V � I Fe, �s a 3 E 1--1 ALT OM ��C CITY � L -- N PARR SH CITY M T: - PIC. TR 30•E E y 1 v (�• in - I II� f j I 2 3 4 5 I ( G� L • \;./ [TL • s 1 — -'—(U- U C C A ST E :\\� G • T_ 8 _ 8 A r F tr.1 s r.1 — • Tr 51 •r ,2 Tr 5-1 1 p r��riA 1p _J O g O •P ,� • 12 -- uj — OE 5 0 Q D" \�' i3 1. T r - J _ p } E \ C / \ • m O 1 • 14 A gI C- - OTe.50'A T. 55 EE LEER 4000 ST • . • s— –�-- - o _. . . so E • LL (�)7 1 2 3 1 4 © •• 3 g � � W } G - � 4c(i)NLL FILING- � SYLVANIA Tr 56 6 l� A . a S '4 A ©z PARK itu.'� = 02 Tr ?A 2 Y F - 1, IA. 11 f,v 10 a --_...- Tr. 7 N063 - Z -- 65 PROPOSED CHANGE FROM 6" TW® FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND " E-R"` RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL. TO E " COMMERCIAL 1300 BLK. HARPER ST AND 3900 8LK WHEELER ST �,/ N O RT N E,AST Recommended _-___.-._tom Petitioner: 514ERLEY BERRY b3TOM LAW Donied................. 0 Percentage of Area : 81 '4 Postponed______________ Scale : 1 " 200 Map No: 25-7 Remarks: Hearing Date: JUNE 18. 19G►3 Pape No. �;� 1 RECOMMENDED: Request of Sherley Berry by Tom Law, 1300 Block Harper St. and 3900 Block 1`heeler St., from "B" Two Family Residential and IIE R" Restricted Commercial to "E" Commercial. I,, 30 Notices of hearing were mailed. 2 Persons were present in favor of the change. 0 Persons were present in opposition to the change. II. Mr. Robert M. Randolph, attorney, and Lr. Sherley Berry, were present and � made the following statements in favor of the change: 1. Mr. Berry owns most of this property as well as commercially-zoned property to the wast on Beach St. 2. Under approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustment, Mr. Berry has a construc- tion Equipment storage yard on part of the property, with employee parking and repair shop. 3. He has moved most of the construction equipment to a new location. 4. If the zone changeis approved, a buyer proposes to construct a 22,000 sq.ft. building housing one tenant. It is proposed to landscape the property which will increase its attractiveness and value to the area. 5. Property owners in the area do not object. 6. "E-P'l Planned Commercial zoning had been considered but the prcEpective buyer needs "E" Comercial zoning. SUL,"MARY: The proposed change is compatible with existing and proposed development of the area. VOTE ON NOTION TO RECOMMEND: 7 AYES 0 NOES 2 ABSENT - N0. 63-Z-65 r � i V' • 1 PH OF IMM, gN "FIN ROA,sid,pll* IBM! 'N\ 112211IN all IN IN No me tame Lot AINIM \ W igge is MAIN 01 Al R OR MEN MNI RK, MWO NO ,01 SEEM MIMI 21 WAMPINNN � \ ON c �a • .t i • i � { 1 • REC01,1 TENDED: Request of Sam Lee by J.R. Johnson, Jr., 1600 and 1700 Blocks of Old University Drive, from "I" Light Industrial to "G" Commercial. I., 13 Notices of hearing were mailed. 1 Person was present in favor of the change. 0 Persons were present in opposition to the change. II. Sam Lee was present and made the following statements in favor of the change: 1. The property adjoins Forest Park and fronts on University Drive. There is a go—cart track on one corner and a driving rangeon a portion of the property. The Forest Bark Motel adjoins on the north. 2. If the changes approved, it is proposed to construct a motel and convention center on the property. 3. Under the present zoning, a "string" commercial development or factories could be located on the property. The proposed change, he believes, will upgrade the property, be an attractive use adjoining the Park and fill a need in Fort Worth. SUMARY: The proposed change will permit uses compatible with existing and futaire use of the area. It also will prevent undesirable uses which are permissible unddr existing zoning. VOTE ON HOTION TO RECOM. ND: 7 AYES 0 NOES 2 ABSENT NO. 63-Z-68 OTHER NATTERS Mr. Joe Lops attorney, and Mr. Paul L. Hamilton, 5725 Prieadowbrook Drive, appeared before the Commission with reference to a petition signed by many property owners in the vicinity of Weiler and i-eadowbrook. They asked that the Commission set a public hearing, without a petition and without agreement of the owner, to consider ■, a change�n zoning on property at the northeast corneof the intersection, to "A" One-Family Presidential. The City Zoning Commission had recommendhd and the City Council had approved changing the zoning from "A" to "C" Apartment and 'IF-R" Restricted Commercial on Docket 62-Z-71-CC, over the protests of adjoining property owners. The request was referred to the Staff for a study and a report to the Zoning Commission at a futur*eeting. The Staff was instructed to set a public hearing July 16, 1963, to consider initial zoning on a newly annexed area lying south of the U.; . Narcotics Hospital, on both side of Loop Freeway I-820. The Staff was instructed to set a public hearing to consider a change in zoning on property lying immediately south of G.S.I. Airport - Dallas-Fort North Field, July 16, 1963. The Staff was instructed to invite the City Council to a joint meeting with the Zoning Commission to review two proposed new sections in the Zoning Ordinance, one ~ covaring flood plans and one covering agricultural districts.