Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5345 ORDINANCE NO.- AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVID- ING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF COX STREET _AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CONTRACT TO S.R.O. ASPBALT, INC. FOR THE MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBT- EDNESS THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESS- MENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS.THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CER- TIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE ESTIMATES; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSE- QUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE FORTIETH LEG- ISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106, COMMONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDI- NANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has prepared Plans and Speci- fications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been examined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all matters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I. The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and adopted. II. There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter described portions of streets, av- enues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, to-wit: 1. Cox Street: From Dillard Street to Burger Street, known and designated as Unit No. 1. 2. Cox Street: From Burger Street to Stalcup Road, known and designated as Unit No. 2. 3. Dillard Street: From Cox Street to Turner Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3. 4. Dillard Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4. 5. Burger Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 5. 6. Pinson Street: From Village Creek Road to Walker Street, known and designated as Unit No. 6. 7. Pinson Street: From Walker Street to Dillard Street, known and designated as Unit No. 7. e • e � « • v III Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, shall be improved by raising, grading, and filling same and by constructing thereon the following, to-wit: 1. Cox Street: From Dillard Street to Burger Street, , known and designated as Unit No. 1, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 2. Cox Street: From Burger Street to Stalcup Road, known and designated as Unit No. 2, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 3. Dillard Street: From Cox Street to Turner Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 4. Dillard Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 5. Burger Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 5, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 6. Pinson Street: From Village Creek Road to Walker Street, known and designated as Unit No. 6, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 7. Pinson Street: From Walker Street to Dillard Street, known and designated as Unit No. 7, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 8. Pinson Street: From Dillard Street to Burger Street, known and designated as Unit No. 8, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 9. Pinson Street: From Burger Street to Stalcup Road, known and designated as Unit No. 9, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 3D foot roadway. 10. Lena Street: From Cottey Street to Fitzhugh Street, known and designated as Unit No. 10, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 11. Fitzhugh Street: From Langston Street to Village Creek Road, known and designated as Unit No. 11, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 12. Fitzhugh Street: From Village Creek Road to Walker Street, known and designated as Unit No. 12, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 13. Fitzhugh Street: From Walker Street to Dillard Street, known and designated as Unit No. 13, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot raodway. 14. Vincennes Avenue: From Willie Street (north) to Dunbar Street, known and designated as Unit No. 14, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 to 26 foot roadway. a � The above, together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurten- ances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor. IV. The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as follows, to-wit: A. The property abutting on that portion of the street, avenue or public place and the real and true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine- tenths (9/10ths) of the estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements. B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said improvements after deduct- ing the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A. The amounts payable by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners thereof and shall constitute a first and prior lien upon such properties and a personal liability of the real and true owners thereof, and shall be payable, to-wit: When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular unit, the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become payable in five (6) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of such completion and acceptance, and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such installments after the date of completion and acceptance of such respective unit. The entire amount assessed against the particular parcels of property shall bear interest from the date of such completion and acceptance of the improvements on the unit upon which the particular property abuts at the rate of six (6%) per cent per annum, payable annually except as to interest on the first installment, which shall be due and payable on the date said installment matures, provided that any _owner shall have the right to pay any and all of such installment at any time before maturity by paying princi- pal with interest accrued to the date of payment, and further provided if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immediately due and payable; but it is specifically provided that no assessment shall in any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special benefits to property in the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing.provided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case until after notice of hearing as pro- vided by law. Said assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed,in the name of the City of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaining the right to authorize payment of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such com- pleted and accepted unit in not more than forty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than $9.00 each, the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than 30 days after the completion and acceptance by .the City of the particular unit, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby em- powered to authorize payments of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payment shall be authorized only in instances where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful, valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms there- of of the sums assessed against such property. u V. The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the Citi- Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon. and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments, or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, and the name of the owners, as far as known, and shall contain such other recitals as may be pertin- ent thereto, and shall further recite substantially that all proceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability of the owners there- of, have been regularly had, done and performed. and such recitals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substan- tially that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together wtili reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which, as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior lien against the property, superior to all other liens and claims except State, County, School District, and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall invalidate any assessment or any certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not invalidate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto. VI. Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and the bid of S.R.O. Asphaltic, Inc. having been found to be the lowest and best bid for the making and construction of said improvements, the contract therefore is hereby awarded to S.R.O. Asphaltic, Inc. , at and for the prices stated in the Proposal of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department, which said report and recom- mendation is on file with the City, the City :Manager, and City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the name of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things, the prices for the work. VII. To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by said contract. there is hereby appropriated out of available funds and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pay said indebtedness so incurred. VIII. The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, which law has been adopted as an amend- ment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and under which law these proceedings are taken and had. ix. Each unit above described shall be and constitute a separate and independent unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be made for the improvements in each unit according to the cost of the improvements in that unit and according to the benefits arising from the improvements in that unit. 4 1 X. In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it .shall not be necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall be valid. XL The Director of Public Worms of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is hereby, ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of such improvements in each unit, in accordance with the terms of the powers and provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth; Texas. XII. The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature of the State of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature, said Act having been passed in the year 1930, and now shown as Article 1220a of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. XI1I. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. XIV. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS_ _.__._ DAY OF__—__ 19-- APPROVED 9 .APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney ATTACHMENT "A" PAGE Iof2 CITY OF FORT WORTH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ASSESSMENT PAVING 14 LOCATIONS IN THE DUNBAR SCHOOL AREA PROJECT NO. 097-24000-137 RESUME OF PROJECT A Neighborhood Hearing was conducted by the Public Works Department at the Dunbar Elementary School on February 1, 1965, for Assessment Paving at 14 Locations in the Dunbar School Area, Prosect No. 097.-24000-137. The procedures concerning owner participation in the cost of paving, including methods and policies of determining assessments, street construction standards, and the methods of payment were explained to the 47 people in attendance. UNIT 1 - COX STREET: Dillard Street to Burger Street. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 2 - COX STREET: Burger Street to Stalcup Road. This unit was initiated by the City to connect Unit 1 with Stalcup Road. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 3 - DILLARD STREET: Cox Street to Turner Street. This unit was initiated by the City to connection Unit 1 and Unit 4. No objections to theme pAving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. MT 4 - DILLARD STREET: Turner Street to Pinson Street. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 5 - BURGER STREET: Turner Street to Pinson Street. This unit was initiated by the City to provide adequate drainage in the area. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 6 - PINSON STREET: Village Creek Road to Walker Street. Bertha Dean Griffin, owner of Lot 7 and the west k of Lot 6, Block 19, Sunrise Addition, expressed opposition to the amount of her assessment because it is too much for her to pay. It was explained to her that the City •has available a method of payment for situations where the assessment will cause a financial hardship on the property owner. UNIT 7 - PINSON STREET: Walker Street to Dillard Street. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 8 - PINSON STREET: Dillard Street to Burger Street. Leona Prince, owner of Lots 4 and part of Lot 5, Block 9, Sunrise Addition, was opposed to the improvements because she felt that the area surrounding this street is not developed enough to warrant the improvements. Mr. Bishop Fry, North 55' of Lot 6, Block 9, Sunrise Addition, questioned whether the combine assessments for paving Pinson Street at the side and Dillard Street at the front of his property actually enhanced the property value in the amount of the combined assessments ($837). An independent appraisal was made which justifies a PAGE 2 or 2 reduction in the side lot assessment from $540 to $250, as described in the section on recommended reductions found. on Page 2 of this resume. The proposed assessment for frontage paving was unchanged, resulting in a proposed combined assessment of $547 for both frontage paving on Dillard Street and side lot paving on Pinson Street. UNIT 9 - PINSON STREET: Burger Street to Stalcup Road. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 10 - LENA STREET: Cottey Street to Fitzhugh Street. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 11 - FITZHUGH STREET: Langston Street to Village Creek Road. Mr. Elmer Louis Kennard, owner of Lot 37, Block 1, Douglas Park Addition, expressed his approval of the paving of Fitzhugh Street. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNITS 12 & 13 - FITZHUGH STREET: Village Creek Road to Dillard Street. No objections to the paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 14 - VINCENNES AVENUE: Willie Street (north) to Dunbar Street. Mr. Bill Wilson, owner of Lot 1, Block 76 Stalcup 1st Filing, expressed opposition to the paving because, in his opinion, it is not right to force payment on property owners who do not desire the improvements. It was explained to Mr. Wilson that this unit had been petitioned by people living on Vincennes Avenue and that a poll card survey was presently being taken to determine the wishes of the property owners. Recommended Assessment Reductions In response to requests by property owners, the Public Works Department retained an independent appraiser to determine the estimated increase in land value to certain lots in various units as a result of the proposed street improvements. The appraisal indicated that the benefit from the paving would be less than the proposed assessment on the following four parcels of property: UNIT) PROPERTY PROPOSED PAVING APPRAISED IN- DIFFER- NO. OWNER DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT CREASE IN VALUE ENCE 6 Johnny Brown, Jr.-Lot 14-E, Block 18 $540 $500 $40 Sunrise Addition 8 Bishop Fry - N.55° of Lot 6, Block $540 $250 $290 9, Sunrise Addition 12 Carrie Turner - W.118° of Lot 6, Block $540 $250 $290 4, Parkview Addition 13 R.P. Estes and - Lot 1, Block 2B Grove $540 $500 $40 G.W. Turpin Hill Addition $660 The Public Works Department recommends reduction of the paving assessments on the above parcels of property in the amount shown as the difference between the proposed assessment and the appriased increase. �r, nHcwl t,� , JIE el Ism 4-` � '' '�! w,.A ,�y,.•, t,�! In t/ I � �.,y ` .��� UPC ` - '.11•,' :., 'j f9UNCHE PARK! { '.I�:kRi: ✓;J 12 •L/ 100 _ I ....' tit ;,,. ,S ♦r� j \ �. _ {. -, Y; i I. ,...•� " iI .. a A- � ! T. � � H I�G= r. y :•1" _ v✓+—`r=-.fi--� � 1i;�r/s'/7 � 1 I l 1.4,�rEvi, � —� •C�EE►c `��arae ARLING TON LOCATION MAP ASSESSMENT PAVING 14 LOCATIONS IN THE DUNBAR - SCHOOL AREA PUBLIC WORKS EMGIMEERIMG DEPARTMENT DIVISIOW C. M.. T W E L I KI M. VV. A-M IS JR. DIRECTOR CHIEF ENGINEER 097- 24000- 137 ATTACHMENT IV' PACE 1 of 15 14 LOCATIONS IN THE DUNBAR' SCHOOL AREA PER Project 097-24000137 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................a143- ,135,x50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 14,313.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................. .a 157,449.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19,081.62 94.9 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. l a 03l.00 5.1 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 20,112.62 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 112,009.15 71.2 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 6.051.97 3,8 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................a 118,061.12 75.0 LESS CREDITS GRANTED..........................................................................................:.'... 18.417.59 11.7 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................99.643.53* 63.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................a 57,805.52* 36.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 20,112.62 6,457.75 PER CENT 100.0 32.1 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 224 90 THE CUMULATIVE RESULTS OF THE POST CARD SURVEYPER CENT 100.0 40.2 ARE AVAILABLE UPON NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 202 78 REQUEST. PER CENT 100.0 38.6 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 99 56 PER CENT 100 56.6 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 103 22 PER CENT 100.0 21.4 Council approval of the recommended reductions in assessments mill reduce the Net Assessments to $98,983.53 and increase the City's cost to $58,465.52. ATTACHMENT "Bu Page 2 of 15 COX STREET DILLARD TO BURGER Unit 1 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................s 11,503.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1.150.35 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 129653.85 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1$537.2 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. ..0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 103702 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................# 9$023.36 71.3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -a �a GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 9$023.36 71.3 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 776.48 6.1 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................. .............................. 8$246.88 65.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE....... .......III 4$406.97 34.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 11537.2 886.6 348.6 128.0 11060.6 PER CENT 100.0 57.7 22.7 8.3 69.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 16 8 - 4 1 11 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 25'0 6.2 68.8 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 15 7 4 1 10 PER CENT 100.0 46.7 26.7 6.6 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 10 5 3 1 6 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 60.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 5 2 1 -O- 4 PER CENT 100.0 40.0 20.0 -0- 80.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 3 of 15 COX STREET BURGER TO STALCUP PER Unit 2 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 91991.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 999.15 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 10,990.65 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.....................: .......... 19312.8 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE .......................................... 1931208 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 79706.14 70.1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0.. �a GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$79706.14 70.1 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 651.58 5.9 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 7.054.56 64.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$39936.09 35.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19312.8 441.4 55.0 816.4 PER CENT 100.0 33.6 4.2 62.2 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 13 3 1 9 PER CENT 100,10 23.1 7.7 69.0 H NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 H 3 1 9 PER CENT 100.0 23.1 7.7 69.0 H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 2 -0- 1 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 -0- 33.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 1 1 8 PER CENT 100.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 ATTACHMENT "H" PAGE 4 of 15 DILLARD STREET COX STREET TO TURNER STREET Unit 3 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE.........................................................................................................._$ 69639.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 663.90 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 7,302.90 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1912000 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19120.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 69574.40 9010 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$69574.40 90.0 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 29686,40 36.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 3p888.00 53.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................s3l,414.90 46.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1!,120.0 -0- 560.0 56000 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 50.0 50.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 "0- 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 9 -0- 50.0 50.0 H d NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 z -O- 50.0 50.0 H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET PER CENT OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 _0_ 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 50.0 50.0 . a> ATTACMENT 11$11 PAGE 5 of 15 DILLARD STREET TURNER TO PINSON Unit 4 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE...........................................................................................................S 7,343.00_ ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 734.30 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 8,077.30 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,120.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1,120.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 69574.40 81.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -0- GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................S 69574.40 81.4 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1.768.40 21.9 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 42806.00 59.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................# 39271.30 40.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,120.0 410.0 A05:A 250.0 565.0 PER CENT 100.0 36.6 27.2 22.3 50.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 13 8 6 1 6 PER CENT 100.0 61.5 46.5 7.6 46.2 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 11 8 6 1 4 PER CENT 100.0 72.7 54.5 9.1 36.4 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 9 7 6 -0- 3 PER CENT 100.0 77.8 66.7 -0- 33.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 1 -0- 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 -0- 50.0 50.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 6 of 15 BURGER STREET TURNER TO PINSON PER Unit 5 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 70356.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 735.60 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 8,091.60 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1912000 10010 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. _0_ TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19120.O 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$69574.40 8102 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 6t574.40 81.2 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 2.551.40 31.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 4.023.00 49,7 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$4'068.60 50.3 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FORAQAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19120.0 -0- 230.0 890. 0 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 20.5 79.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 5 _0_ 1 4 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 20.0 80.0 W© NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 5 I-4 -0- 1 4 PER CENT 100.0 r¢i -0- 20.0 80.0 F H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 H -a 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 33.3 66.7 F-1 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 U -13. _13. 2 PER CENT 100.0 -0- -0- 100.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 7 of 15 PINSON STREET VILLAGE CREEK ROAD TO WALKER Unit 6 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE...........................................................................................................s 12,452.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 19245.28 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST............................................................................... .; 13,698.03 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19270.0 71.8 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 498.0 28.2 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 11,768.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 71454.91 54.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 2*923.26 21.3 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................3 109378.17 75.7 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 742.71 5.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 9*635.46 70.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i4,062.57 29.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 11,768.0 381.0 304.0 625.0 839.0 PER CENT 100.0 21.5 17.2 35.4 47.4 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 15 4 4 4 7 PER CENT 100.0 26.7 26.7 26.7 46.6 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 3 3 4 6 PER CENT 100.0 23.1 23.1 30.8 46.1 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 3 2 1 -0- PER CENT 100.0 100.0 66.7 33.3 -D- OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 +0- 1 3 6 PER CENT 100-00 -0- 10.0 30.0 60.0 Council approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net Assessments to $9p595.46 and increase the City's cost to $4v102.57. ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 8 of 15 PINSON STREET WALKER TO DILLARD Unit 7 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE....:.......................................................................................................$ 109582.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 10058.27 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 11 t 641.02 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1 f 425.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0" .O. TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1 9 425.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................:89364.78 71.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 81364.78 71.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 669.78 5.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 79695.00 66.1 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE..................................................................................I.....................s39946.02 33.9 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19425.0 683.75 430.0 -0- 995.0 PER CENT 100.0 48.0 30.2 -0.0 69.8 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 17 9 5 12 PER CENT 100.0 52.9 29.4 -0- 70.6 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 16 8 5 -0- 11 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 31.3 -0- 68.7 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 12 7 4 8 PER CENT 100.0 58.3 33.3 -0- 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 1 1 -0- 3., PER CENT 100.0 25.0 25.0 -0- 75.0 4 1 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 9 of 15 PINSON STREET DILLARD TO BURGER PER Unit 8 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 9.693.25 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 969.33 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 100662.58 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19560.0 10010 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1956000 100.0 RESIDENTIAL. ASSESSMENT......................................................i 99157.20 85,9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- tea. GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 99157.20 85.9 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 895.20 8.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................ . 89262.00 77.5 NETAMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.............................................................................................. ...s29400,58 22.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19560.0 455.0 520.0 195.0 845.0 PER CENT 100.0 29.2 33.3 12.5 54.2 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 15 4 4 2 9 PER CENT 100.0 26.7 26.7 13.3 60.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 14 4 4 1 9 PER CENT 100.0 28.6 28.6 7.1 64.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 8 4 4 -0- 4 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 -0- 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 6 -0- -0 1 5 PER CENT 100.0 -0- -0- 16.7 83.3 *Uouncil approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net Assessments to $7,972.00 and increase the City's cost to $2,690.58. m ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 10 of 15 PINSON STREET BURGER TO STALCUP Unit 9 PERCENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................= 109 254.75 ENGINEERING .......................................................................................I...................... 1,025.47 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................ 119280.22 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.. 775.0 59.3 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 533.0 40.7 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................1 9 308 0 0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 4,549.25 40.3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 39 128.71 27.7 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................5 79677.96 68.0 LESS CREDITS GRANTED..........................................................................-................... .364.25 3.2 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.,.............................................................................................................................. 79313.71 64.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................5 39966,51 35.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,308.0 320.0 195,0 136.6 976.4 PER CENT 100.0 24.5 14.9 10.4 74.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 13 5 2 1 10 PER CENT 100.0 38.5 15.4 7.7 76.9 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 5 2 1 10 PER CENT 100.0 38.5 15.4 7.7 76.•9 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 2 2 -0- 2 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 -0- 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 9 3 -0-- 1 8 PER CENT 100.0 33.3 -0- 11.1 88.9 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 11 of 15 LENA STREET COTTEY TO FITZHUGH PER Unit 10 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 11.385.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1.138.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................. ...............s 12.524.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19700.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1970000 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 90979.00 79.7 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- _a GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED...........................................................................................; 99979.00 79.7 LESSCREDITS GRANTED........................................................................I..........I.......I..., 799.00 6.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 99180.00 73.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................I........ 39344.05 26.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19700.0 750.0 450.0 225.0 1,025.0 PER CENT 100.0 44.1 26.5 13.2 60.3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 20 9 5 3 12 PER CENT 100.0 45.0 25.0 15.0 60.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 19 9 5 3 11 PER CENT 100.0 47.4 26.3 15.8 57.9 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 9 7 4 -0- 5 PER CENT 100.0 77.8 44.4 -0- 55.6 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 2 1 3 6 PER CENT 100.0 20.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 12 of 15 FITZHUGH STREET LANGSTON TO VILLAGE CREEK ROAD PER Unit 11 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 15.282.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1,528.28 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 16.811.03 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 29.287.6 10010 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. TOTAL FOOTAGE ......................................... 29287.6 100.0 RESIDENTIAL. ASSESSMENT......................................................a 13428.22 79.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -a GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 139428.22 79.9 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 11171.30 7.0 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.-.............................I.............................................................................................. 129256.92 72.9 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE...................................................................................................... $ 4,554.11 27.1 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO ABJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 2v287.6 987.4 800.0 250. 0 19237.6 PER CENT 100.0 43.2 35.0 10.9 54.1 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 38 16 13 4 21 PER CENT 100.0 42.1 34.2 10.5 '55.3 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 36 15 13 3 20 PER CENT 100.0 41.7 36.1 8.3 55.6 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 21 12 10 2 9 PER CENT 100.0 57.1 47.6 9.5 42.9 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 15 3 3 1 11 PER CENT 100.0 20.0 20.0 6.7 73.3 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 13 of 15 FITZHUGH STREET VILLAGE CREEK ROAD TO WALKER (WEST) Unit 12 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE.............................................................................................,...............i 119196.50 ENGINEERING ...................................................................................I.......................... 19119.65 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 121316.15 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................. 1947607 100. COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- 0- TOTAL TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 11476.7 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................; 8,668.23 70.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... _0_ -0- GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................= 8g668.23 70.4 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 29320.25 18.9 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 69347.98 * 51.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................=%968.17 * 48.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19476.7 400,0 150.0 636.7 690.0 PER CENT 100.0 27.1 10.2 43.1 46.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 19 8 3 4 12 PER CENT 100.0 42.1 15.8 21.1 63.1 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 17 8 3 3 11 PER CENT 100.0 47.1 17.7 17.7 64.6 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 7 3 2 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 42.8 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 5 1 1 8 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 Council approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net Assessments to $6,057.98 and increase the City's cost to $6,258.17. ATUCIRIENT @GBee FAM 14 of 15 FITZHWH STREET WALKER TO DILLARD Unit 13 PER T CEN CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 139327.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1.332.77 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 149660.52 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,633.32 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19-633.32 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 99587.58 65.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 99587.58 65.4 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 19472.36 10.0 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 89115.22 * 55.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i 69545.30 * 44.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED �T NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,633.32 995.0. 1.90.0 759.0 684.32 PER CENT 100.0 60.9 11.6 46.5 41.9 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 26 16 2 12 12 PER CENT 100.0 61.5 7.7 46.2 46.1 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 16 8 2 4 10 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 12.5 25.0 62 m 5 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 6 3 2 -0- 4 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 33.3 -0- 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 5 -O= 4 6 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 -0- 40.0 60.0 *Council approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net Assessment to $9,075.22 and increase the City's cost to $6,595.30. ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Q= Straet FROM Dillard Street TO Burger Street PROJECT No. 097-24000m137 A0. 64.:133 UNIT No. °M OF PAGE No. OF 3 C" AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED 'jam OF APPARENT OWNER p FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z� FRONT FEET n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST NO ANSWER Bonner, Sylvester B : nrise !'0.6 5 .87 649.22 597.24 P 110.6 5320 Cox Street Breedlove, Cleveland B 11 Sunrise 124 5.87 727.88 669.60 P 124. 5305 Cox Street Clark, Tiley, Jr., B W. 69' of the 14 aunrise 69 5.87 405.03 372.60 69. 5321 Cox Street S. 150' of Lot 12 Caruthers, James Randolf & B W 1/2 of 10 14 Sunrise 64 5.87 375.68 345160 P 64 Caruthers, Laura Rosa 5225 Cox Street Davis, Rosetta B N. 101 ' of 13 Sunrise 110 5.87 645.70 540.00 110 5113 Fitzhugh Lot 7 Erskine, Odell & Erskine, Louis B 8 14 Sunrise 128 5.87 751 .36 691 .20 P 128 5209 E. Cox Street Johnson, Elijah B 6 13 'unrise 110 5.87 645.70 594.00 ? 1 5208 Cox Street Johnson, George B E 1/2 of 14 Sunrise -87 375.68 345.60 64 c/o Mrs. Genova Harris Lot 10 411 Mark Street Hillsboro, Texas Johnson, Sam 13 Sunrise 110 5.87 645.70 594.E P 110 2925 1/2 Angle Avenue ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Z= Street FROM Dillard Street TO Burger Street PROJECT No. 097-24000137 A.P. 64+133 UNIT No. 1 OF 14 PAGE No. 2 OF 30 AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER z FEET PER AMOUNT z~ FRONT FEET AFTER n�i LOT SLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST NO ANSWgR Lewis, Dave B 7 14 Sunrise 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 P 130 5201 East Cox Midway Savings Assn. B 3—A 13 'unrise 55 5;87 322.85 297.00 55 Box 232 Arlington, Texas Mims, Luther B E. 59.61 of 14 Sunrise 59.6 5.87 349.85 321 .84 59.6 5319 Cox Street S. 1501 of Lot 12 Morris, Colvin B 9 14 Sunrise 128 5.87 751 ,36 691 .20 128.0 5217 Cox Street Tillman, Roosevelt L. B 4 13 Sunrise 110 5.87 645.70 594.00 P 110 5224 Cox Street Tillman, Roosevelt L. B 5 13 Sunrise 110 5.87 645.70 594.00 P 110 5224 Cox Street Whittaker, Mae Mrs. B 3—B 13 Sunrise 55 5.87 322.85 297.00 55 1516 South Edgewood 1,537.2 99023.36 ,246.88 348.6 128.0 ,060.6 Parcels 16 Owners 15 4 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Cox Street FROM Burger Street TO Stalcup Road PROJECT No, 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 2 OF 14 PAGE No. 3 OF 30 AMOUNT z NAME AND ADDRESS w PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY 2 FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER ZF= FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS c9W NO n�i LOT BLK. ADDITION cna FOR AGAINST ANSW gR Baughman, Homer L., Sr. B W 1/2 of Lot 2 12 Sunrise 55 5.87 322.85 297.00 55 2913 Princeton Beck, Morris G. B W. 50' of Lot 11 Sunrise 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 6028 Prothron 8 Brooks, William B S. 180' of 11 'unrise 80 5.87 469.60 432.00 80 5401 Cox Street W. 80' of Lot 6 Cheatom, Webster B E. 1/2 of 11 ,urnise 65 5.87 381 .55 351 .00 P 65 1220 E. Mulkey Lot 7 Edwards, Hattie B N. 200' of 12 Sunrise 110 5.87 645.70 594.00 P .1..14 339 Victoria Street Lot 3 San Francisco, California Hawthorne, Eliz B N. 182' of 12 Sunrise 110 5.87 645.70 594.00 110 (Address Unknown) Lot 4 McDonald Mortgage Com B E. 1/2 of 12 Sunrise 55 5.87 322.85 297.00 55 1200 W. Lancaster Lot 2 Myatt, Layland B E. 50' of S. 11 Sunrise 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 3528 Laughton 130' of Lot 6 Sargent, Dave B 9 & 10 11 Sunrise 266.4 5.87 1 ,563.77 1 ,438.56 266.4 ;. J612 Stalcup Roa& Thomas, Pinkie B 5 & 6 12 Sunrise 220 5.87 1 ,291 .40 1 ,188.00 220 338 College Street ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Cox Street FROM B4rger Street TO Stalcup Road UNIT No. OF PAGE No. OF 30 PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 2 14 + AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO OF APPARENT OWNER zFEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z— FRONT FEET n�i LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST W ANER r Williams, Mrs. Albert B E. 801 of 11 Sunrise 80 5.87 496.60? '' A 432.00 80 Star Route, 13oic 14 Lot 8 Crockett, Texas Williams, Mrs. Jessie B W. 1/2 of 11 Sunrise 65 5.87 381 .55 351 .00 P 65 5409 Cox Street Lot 7 Williams, Leroy B 1-A 12 Sunrise 106.4 5.87 624.57 540.40 106.4 Route 12, Box 798 Fort Worth, Texas 1 ,312.8 7,70 .14 7,054.56 "l .4 55.0 816.4 Parcels 13 Owners 13 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Dillard Street FROM Cox Street TO Turner Street PROJECT No. 097®24000137 A.P. 64®133 UNIT No. 3 OF 14 PAGE No- 5 OF 30 AMOUNT Z NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo RESULT Of POST CARD SURVEY Of APPARENT OWNER Z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER zF= FRONT FEET n0i LOT BLK. PAD:DI:TION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS NaFOR AGAINSTNO ANSWER Booker, A. J. B 10 15 ise 280 5.87 1 ,643.60 972.00 280 Route 4, Box 215 Bryan, Texas Hardeman, Wesley B 6 14 Sunrise 280 5.87 1 ,643.60 972.00 280 5200 Turner Street Jefferson, Josie Mae B 1 15 Sunrise 280 5.87 1,643.60 972.00 280 (Address Unknown) Lewis, Dave B 7 14 Sunrise 280 5.87 19643.60 972.00 280 "5201 East Cox Street Total 1,120 6,574.40.. 30888.00 _0- 560 560 Parcels 4 Owners 4 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMFnrr ROLLS FOR PAVING OF DILLARD STREET FROM TURNER STREET TO P?NSON STREET PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 4 OF 14 PAGE No. 6 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED W0 OF APPARENT OWNER z FEET PER AMOUNT V- FRONT FEET o AFTER op n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST NO ANSWER Cofields, Evella B S. 50' of N. 16 Sunrise 50 5.87 293.50 270,00 P 50 3024 Dillard Street 150° of 10 Pry, Bishop B N.55' of 6 9 " 55 5.87 322.85 297.00 P 55 3001 Dillard Street Hunter, Tom B S.50' of 9 " 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 3005 Dillard Street N.105' of 6 Jackson, Benny B S.50' of N. 9 " 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 3009 Dillard Street 205' of 6 Jones, Ray B S.55' of N. 9 55 5.87 322.85 297..00 P 55 5017 Pinson Street 260' of 6 Manning, Walter B E.4 of 1 16 " 280 5.87 1,643.60 972.00 280 3012 Dillard Nicholson, Earnest B S.50' of N. 16 1B 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 3020 Dillard 100' of 10 Prince, Wendell B W.60' of S. 9 '° 250 5.87 1,467.50 810.00 250 1601 South Edgewood 2501 of 7 Spratling, Laura E. B S.50' of N 9 10 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 522 Danciger Building 1551 of 6 Spratling, Laura E. B S.20' of 6 9 11 20 5.87 117.40 108.00 20 522 Danciger Building ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF DILLARD STREET FROM TURNER STREET TO PINSON STREET PROTECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 4 OF 14 PAGE No. 7 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo W Z FEET PER AMOUNT z~ FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER p AFTER 0~ FOR AGAINST NO w LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS _a I ANSWER Spratling, Laura E. B N.30' of W. 9 Sunrise 30 5.87 176.10 162.00 30 522 Danciger Building 60' of 7 Stephens, Tilmon B N.501 of 10 16 " 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 3016 Dillard Trustees of Sunrise Church of B S. 130' of E 16 " 130 5.87 763.10 540.00 130 God in Christ of 10 c/o C. Na Lee 3016 Walker Street TOTAL 1,120.0 6,574.40 4.,806.00 305 250 565 Parcels 13 Owners 11 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF 3 BUrger Street FROM Turner Street TO Pinson Street PROJECT No. 097®24000-137 A.P. 64133 UNIT No. :° OF 14 PAGE No. 8 OF 30 AMOUNT Z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESSW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo OF APPARENT OWNER ZFEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z�' FRONT FEET n�i LOT SLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST A NO Blanton, Gertrude B 6 10 :sunrise 280 5.87 1 ,643.60 972.00 280 5401 Turner Road Edwards, Houston B S. 1750 of Lol 9 Sunrise 230 5.87 1 ,350.10 837.00 230 5317 Turner 12 & the N. 55' of Lot 12 McCutcheon, Tony; B 1 9 Sunrise 280 5.87 1 ,643.60 972.00 280 Conner, Maggie; Kellum, Reba; Patterson, Lucille; & Moland, Frances 1620 So. Vive Avenue Tucson, Arizona Mount Horum Baptist Church B S. 50' of N. 9 Sunrise 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 3416 Burger 105' of Lot 12 Ward, Ora Lee B 5 10 Sunrise 280 5.87 1 ,643.60 972.00 280 5400 Pfnsan Street 1 ,120.0 6074.40 4,023.00 _0- 230 890 Parcels Owners 5 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF VAOSON STREET FROM VILlKGE CREEK RD. TO WA1,RER STREET PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64133 UNIT No. 6 OF 14 PAGE No. 9 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESSw PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z� FRONT FEET n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS ins W FOR AGAINST_ANSWER Barnes, R. A. B 1=3 19 Sunrise 50 5.87 293 50 270.00 50 1504 Abram Arlington, Texas Brown, Johnny, Jr. " 745 49 54o000 127 1001 Riverside Drive (500.00) Carter, Jack & A,B,.Z,, 'B 87 1,461 63 1 461 63 249 Carter, Margaret Banks 204 Insurance Building Gill, Hillary B 1-A 9 87 451 99 415 80 T1 c/o Mo C. Gregory 3725° Crestline Road Gilmore, Fred B 4 19 1 ;' 745.49 685 80 127 1624 Terrell Griffin, Dudley F 7 & W. of 19 185-5 5 :87 1,088.88 1,088 88 85 5 3001 Village Greek Road 6 Jackson, Henry B 13 18 11 127 5 87 745.49 685.80 1.27 5601 Shiloh Drive Jackson, Marie F E. h of 6 19 °® 87 372.75 372.75 63 a 1625 E. Terrell Jones, Ray B 10 18 " 127 5®87 745.49 685°80 P 12 5017 Pinson ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF PINSON STREET FROM VILLAGE CREEK RD. TO WALKER STREET PROJECT No. 097-24000137 A.P. 64133 UNIT No. 6 OF 14 PAGE No. 10 OF 30 AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS w PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ' FRONT RATEI GROSS ASSESSED ao RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z- FRONT FEET ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS cna FOR AGAINST N W ER .Jones, Ray B 11 18 t18 127 5.87 745.49 685.80 127 5017 Pinson Leadon, Charlie B 2 19 " 127 5.87 745,49 685,80 P 127 5100 Pinson Lewis, G. D. B W. � of 12 18 " 63.5- 5.87 372.75 342.90 P 63.5 5027 Pinson Lewis, G. D B E. � of 12 18 " 63.5 5.87 372,75 342.:90 P 63.5 5027 Pinson Mathews, Willie 6 .Johnnie B 3 19 " 127 5.87 74549 685..80 127 1603 Amanda Whidley, C. R. B 5 19 " 127 5.87 745.49 685,,80 127 63 Lafayette Avenue Brooklyn 17, N.Y. 1,768.0 10,378.17 9,635.46 304.0 625 0 839 0 Parcels 15 Proposed adjusted assess nt (9,59 .46) Owners 13 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Pinson Street FROM Walker Street TO Dillard Street PROJECT No. 097®24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 7 OF 14 PAGE No. 11 OF AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION co NAME AND ADDRESS W FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED OF APPARENT OWNER z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z FRONT FEET n0i LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST N W Ashworth., C. R. B W. J of 8 17 Sunrise 72.5 5.87 425.58 391.50 P 72.E 116 West Abrams Arlington, Texas Carswell., Washington B E. J of 8 17 Sunrise 12.5 5.87 73.38 67.50 P 5121 Pinson Less the E. 609 of the S. 140' Carswell., Washington B E. 60' of 17 Sunrise 60®0 5.87 352.20 324.00 P 60.0 5121 Pinson S. J of 8 Fort Worth Independent B 6 17 Sunrise 145.0 5.87 851.15 783.00 145.0 School District # 5 I 3210 West Lancaster St. Gentry, Henry B 3 Less the 16 Sunrise 82.0 5.87 481.34 442.80 82.0 1006 11th Avenue E. 480 of the N.130' Height, Thelma & B W. of 17 Sunrise 72.5 5.87 425.58 391.50 P 72.5 Goodspeed, Vivian Taylor Lot 7 5115 Pinson Henderson, Isabell B W, of 16 Sunrise 36.25 5.87 212.79 195.75 P .25 5104 Pinson E. of Lot 5 Jefferson, Josie Mae B 2 16 Sunrise 145.0 5.87 851.15 783.00 145.0 5128 Pinson Leadon, Charlie B N. of 16 Sunrise 72.5 5.87 425.58 391.50 P 72.5 5100 Pinson W. of Lot 5 Majors, Julious, Jr. B E. 'J of 17 Sunrise 72.5 5.87 425.58 391,50 P 72 5117 Pinson Lot 7 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Pinson Street FROM Walker Street TO D Hard Street PROJECT No. 097®24000='37 A.P. 64- 33 UNIT No. 7 OF 14 PAGE No. -: OF 30 AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS w PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z� FRONT FEET r� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST N W ER Manning, Augusta B 9 17 145 5.87 851 783.00 P 5125 Pinson Street Manning, Walter B E. 1/2 of Lott 16 2!-T.rise 7C 5.87 410.90 378.00 70 3012 Dillard Moore, Vivian B W. 1/2 of Lott 16 3iffir _se .87 410.90 378.00 70 916 Maddox Munson, Levi B 10 17 Sunrise 14C .87 821 .80 756.00 P 40 5137 Pinson Pitts, 011ie H. B 4 16 Sunrise 145 5.87 851 .15 783.00 145 5116 Pinson St. Paul Reform Baptist Church B E. 482 of W. 16 Sunrise 48 5.87 281 .76 259..20 48 5128 Pinson 130° of Lot 3 Williams, S. E. 36 1/42 of 16 Sunrise 36.25 5.87 212.79 195.75 36.25 5108 Pinson Total 1 ,425.0 8,364.78 7,695.00 430 00_ 995 -- Parcels 17 Owners 16 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF PINSON STREET FROM DIS STREET TO BURGER STREET PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 8 OF 14 PAGE No.13 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 00 NAME AND ADDRESS W FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WP: FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER oz FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER 0� ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINSTN W ER Barnes, B. A. B W. 50' of S. 6 Sunrise 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 1504 W. Abrams 218' of 10 Arlington, Texas Brown, William B 3 9 " 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 P 130 5300 Pinson Curry, Grady B 2 9 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 130 5304 Pinson Ditto, Dorothy B 9-B 6 " 65 5.87 381.55 351.00 P 65 5221 Pinson Douglas, Thomas M E. 80' of 10 6 " 80 5.87 469.60 432.00 80 (Address Unknown) Foster, Helen B 9-A 6 65 5.87 381.55 351.00 65 5217 Pinson Fry, Bishop B N. 55' of 6 9 " 130 5.87 763.10 540.00 130 3001 Dillard (250.00D Hill, Luther B N. 127' of W. 9 " 65 5.87 381.55 351.00 65 5617 Wellesley 65' of 5 Howard, Frank W. B S. 130' of 7 6 " 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 130 5205 Pinson Johnson, Lonnie B S. 180' of 12 6130 5.87 763.10 702.00 P 130 5323 Pinson ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF PINSON STREET FROM DILLARD STREET TO BURGER STREET PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 8 OF 14 PAGE No. 14 OF 30 NAME AND ADDRESSW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED AMOUNT Wo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER �� OF APPARENT OWNER FRONT FEET n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS i-5 CLI FOR AGAINST NO ANSWER Jones, Waco B 8 6 Sunrise 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 P 130 5213 Pinson Street McCulcheon, Tony; B 1 9 of 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 130 Conner, Maggie; Kellum, Reba; Patterson, Lucille; and Moland, Frances 1620 S. Vive Avenue Tucson, Arizona Prince, Leoma D. B 4 9 it 130 5.87 763.10 702,00 130 2608 Enis Prince, Leoma D.. B 5 less W.65' 9 of 65 5.87 381.55 351.00 65 2608 Enis of N. 127' Ruffin, Claude B 11 6 " 130 5.87 763.$10 702.00 130 1274-A McAllister San Francisco, California 1,560.0 9,157.20 8,262.00 520.0 195 845 Parcels 15 Owners 14 Proposed djusted aqsessnts 7,972.00) A I I AGHNItNT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Pinson Street FROM Burger Street TO Stalcup Road PROJECT No. 097-24000-111 A.P. 64m133 UNIT No. 9 OF 14 PAGE No. 1 ; OF 30 NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WAMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER z FEET PER AMOUNT z�' FRONT FEET AFTER N LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST ANSWER Brown, Mrs. Ethel B 7-A & 7-B 5 Sunrise 130 5.g-7 763.10 702.00 130 5409 Pinson Street Gilchrist, Anna Lora B W. 1/2 of 4 10 Sunrise 65 5.87 33'81 .55 351 .00 P 65 319 W. T. Waggoner Building Harris, Mrs. Willie P. B 6-A & 6-B 5 Sunrise 125 5.87 733.75 675.00 P 125 5401 Pinson Street Johnson, Frank E E. 1/2 of 5 Sunrise 65 5.87 381..55 381 .55 65 5431 Pinson Street Lot 9 Lewis, James Howard E W. 1/2 of 9 5 Sunrise 65 5.87 381 .55 3$1 .55 65 5429 Pinson Street Rogers, Jesse B E. 1/2 of 4 10 Sunrise 65 5.87 381 .55 351.00 P 65 5412 Pinson Scott, Dock, Jr. E 2-B 10 Sunrise 65 5.87 381 .55 381 .55 65 1540 Southland Dallas, Texas Shipley, Jake E 10 5 Sunrise 136.6 5.87 801 .84 801 .84 136.6 2323 Dugald Avenue Dallas 1.6,Texas Spruell, Odie B 8 5 Sunrise 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 130 • 5421 Pinson • Terrell Enterprizes, Inc. E 1 10 Sunrise 136.4 5.87 800.67 800.67 136.4 1057 Evans Avenue A1IAGNMtN1 "G" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF F r -,,r• - t FROM Burger Street TO S#aicup PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-"3-! UNIT No. 9 OF 14 PAGE No. 16 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO W FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER o FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER 0E— n1 LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST N W ER Ward, Ora Lee B 5 10 Sunrise 130 5.87 763010 702.00 P 130 5400 Pinson Street Washington, Edna E 2-A 10 Sunrise 65 5.87 381 .55 381 .55 P 65 2506 Dillard Street Washington, Floyd B 3 10 Sunrise 130 5.87 763.10 702.00 130 1309 South Adams' Total 1 ,308,0 7,677.96 7,313.71 195 136.6 976.4 Parcels 13 Owners 13 n 1 1 ML,Hr tN 1 %;- ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Lena Street FROM Cottey Street To Fitzhugh Street PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 10 OF PAGE No. 17 OF 30 AMOUNT Z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED co W OF APPARENT OWNER Zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z� FRONT FEET ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST NO ANSWER Barnes,, B. A. B 7 8 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 75 1504 West Abram Arlington, Texas Barnes, B. A. B 7 & 8 7 Sunrise 150 5.87 880.50 810.00 150 1504 West Abram Arlington,, Texas Battle,, Augustus B N. 50' of 8 Sunrise 100 5.87 587.00 540,00 100 1065 Freeman Lot 8 .& S. 50' of Lot 9 , Battles, Calvin B S. 25' of 8 Sunrise 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 2800 Lenz Lot 8 .& N. 25' of Lot 9 Dean,, David K. B 1 7 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 75 3001 Village Creek Road Dean, Jimmie Clayton B 2 7 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 75 3001 Village Creek Road Graham,, Banks B 6 7 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 75 2613 Lenz Street Johnson, Will B E. J. of 11 8 Sunrise 100 5.87 587.00 540.00 100 5021 Cottey Street Lena Street Church of B 5 7 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 75 God in Christ 2615 Lena Street McGee, George B 5 8 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 75 2616 Lena Street A 1 1 A1,HMtN 1 "G" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF FROM Cottey Street TO pi zkugt, PROJECT No. 09-7-24000-1 A.P. UNIT No. j 0 OF 1 PAGE No. 18 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO OF APPARENT OWNER p FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z� FRONT FEET n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINSTNO ANSWER McGee, George B S Sunrise 75 5.87 440.2` 405.00 P 75 2616 Lena Mitchell, Artie Lee B 10 7 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 75 2803 Lena Mitchell, Frank B 3 8 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 75 c/o Soo Fort Worth State Bank Moseley, Mrs. Aobera B 3 & 4 7 Sunrise 150 5.87 880.50 810.00 P 150 2613 Lena Olford, Maggie B 9 7 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 2813 Village Creek Road Phillips, Lenolia B Lot 6 Less N. 8 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 2618 Lena Street 50' of W. 136.88 Riley, Nathaniel B. B 11-A 7 Sunrise 100 5.87 587.00 540.00 4 5029 Cottey Smith, Froncell B 10 8 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 75 2813 Village Creek Road Walker, Manse B 2 8 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 4.05.00 P 75 2604 Lena v . Williams, J. C. B E. 138' of 8 Sunrise 4924 Fitzhugh Lot 1 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 75 ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Lena Street FROM Cottey Street TO Fitzhugh Street PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 10 OF 14 PAGE No. 19 OF 30 AMOUNT Z NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESS D co— w OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER Z FEET PER AMOUNT z~ FRONT FEET Q, AFTER cD�- -p t� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST W Young, Ophelia B 4 8 Sunrise 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 P 75 2613 Village Creek Road Total 1 ,700 9,979.0 9,180.00 450 225 1 ,J25 Parcels 20 Owners 19 A-1iAUHA&ENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Fitzhugh Street FROM Langston Street TO Village Creek -Road PROJECT No. 097®24000137 A•P• 64-133 UNIT No. 11 OF 14 PAGE No.20 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED W� W FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER o FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER W- n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST N W ER Anderson, Julia B 7 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 c/o 860 Fortune Street Houston 18, Texas Armstrong, Beatrice B 15 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P* 50 1702 Royalty Odessa, Texas Bend, Calvin B 33 1 ouglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 4814 Sunshine Drive Bend,Lillian B 11 2 ouglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 4828 Fitzhugh Brackens, Ruffus B 36 1 ouglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 c/o Joe Reynolds 1825 Fitzhugh Brinkley, Alfred B 1 Less W. 10' 2 ouglas Park 68 5.87 399.16 367.20 P 68 4800 Fitzhugh Brinkley, Alfred S. B 2 2 ouglas Park 50 5.87 293-50 270.00 P 50 4800 Fitzhugh Cellard, Jimmie B 39 1 ouglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 4817 Fitzhugh Davis, Dave B 6 2 ouglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 5113 Fitzhugh * Change of Oirship, ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Fitzhugh Sta•eet FROM Livingston Street TO Village Creek Road PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-.;.::3 UNIT No. 11 OF 14 PAGE No. OF AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z " FRONT FEET C NO ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST ANSW gR Dixson, Margie Ree B 41 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 4803 Fitzhugh Street Hamilton, William O'Neal B 16 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 Route 19 Box 449 Burleson, Texas Hardeman, Henry B 22 2 Douglas Park 69.4 5.87 407.38 374.76 P 69.4 5015 Fitzhugh Street Hardeman, Henry J. B 21 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 917 South Main Street Henderson, Charlie B 14 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 2720 Finley Henderson, Warren B 31 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 5640 Rickenbacker Holiman, Edgar B 9 & 10 2 Douglas Park 100 5.87 587.00 540.00 P 100 4826 Fitzhugh Street Johnson, Harold Lee B S. - of Lot 1 Douglas Park 69.4 5.57 407.38 374.76 69.4 811 Missouri 23 Jones, Odell B 32 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 (Address Unknown) Jones, Roy B 8 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 154 Judkins N 1 1 mt.111MCN 1 "U" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Fitzhugh Street FROM Langston Street TO "Village Creek Road PROJECT No, 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-137 UNIT No. 11 OF 14 PAGE No. 22 OF AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS w PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo Z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER o �� FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS w NO r.� LOT BLK. ADDITION Na FOR AGAINST ANSWER Kennard, Elmer Louis B 37 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 4821 Fitzhugh Street Lattimore, H. M. B 4 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 512 Continental Life Bldg. Phillips, George B 12 & 13 2 Douglas Park 100 5.87 587.00 540.00 P 100 4900 Fitzhugh Street Pitts, Amanda B 34 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 1929 Dartmoor Court Reynolds, Joe W. B 35 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 4825 Fitzhugh Street Rogers, Mrs. Louise B 29 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 2302 South Jennings Avenue Shields, George B 44 Less R.O.0 1 Douglas Park 80.8 5.87 474.30 340.20 80.8 4801 Fitzhugh Street Sumrow, Floyd E. B 40 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 4229 Selkirk Drive West Taylor, Lee Earl B 38 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 4824 Sunshine Drive a p . o , ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Fitzhugh Street. FROM Langston Street TO Village Creek Road PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64133 UNIT No. OF PAGE No. 23 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO Z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z�— FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS ya FOR AGAINST ANSWER n�i LOT BLK. ADDITION Virden, Joseph T. B 17 18, & 19 2 Douglas Park 150 _5.87 880.50 810.00 150 c/o Naomi Taylor 1009 E. Ramsey Walker, Henry Y. B 30 1 ouglas Park 50 5.87 293.5.0.1 270.00 50 4909 Fitzhugh Washington, James B 24 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293-50 270;00 50 4929 Fitzhugh Webb, Leroy B 3 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293°50 270.00 50 4806 Fitzhugh Whitaker, Esther B 42 & 43 1 Douglas Park 100 5.87 587.00 540.00 100 4803 Fit zh ugh Whitaker, Richard B 5 2 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293-50 270.00 50 c/(6 Esther Whitaker 4803 Fitzhugh Williams, Rayfield B 27 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 29350 270.00 P 50 4925 Fitzhugh Williams, Rayfield B 25 & 26 1 Douglas Park 100 5.87 587.00 540.00 P 100 4925 Fitzhugh .. Williams, Tom 28 1 Douglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 r 4917 Fitzhugh A11AUHMtNI "G" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Fitzhugh Street FROM Langston Street TO Village Creek Road PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A•P• 64-133 UNIT No. 11 OF 14 PAGE No. 24 OF 30 NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESS D WAMOUNT o RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY Z FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z;= FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS "W FOR AGAINST NO n�i LOT BLK. ADDITION in- N SWLR Williams, Vivian B 20 2 Bouglas Park 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 4924 Fitzhugh Total 2,287.6 139428.22 12,256.92 800 250 18237.6 Parcels 38 Owners 36 A 1 1 AlAIMtNT ^(;^ ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Fitzhugh Street FROM Village Creek Rd. TO Walker Street (West) PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 12 OF 14 PAGE No. 25 OF 30 AMOUNT NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER Z FEET PER AMOUNT ZF' FRONT FEET O AFTER c0E- r� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST AN W ER Brown, Chester A. B 30 4 Parkview 50 5.87 293-50 270.00 50 5033 Fitzhugh Cobb, Manuel B 24 4 Parkview 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 5019 Fitzhugh Street Dean, David B 1 7 Sunrise 214.7 5.87 1 ,260.29 619.38 214.7 3001 Village Creek Aoad Edwards, J. P. B 19 4 Parkview 41 5.87 240.67 221 .40 41 5005 Fitzhugh Edwards, J. P. B 20 4 Parkview 42 5.87 246,54 226.80 42 5005 Fitzhugh Gilchrist, Anna Lora B W. 80' of 1 8 Sunrise 80 5.87 469.60 324.00 80 319 W. T. Waggoner Building Green, Leana B 21 4 Parkview 50 5.87 293.50 270,00 P 50 5013 Fitzhugh Hardeman, Henry James B 22 4 Parkview 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 5015 Fitzhugh Jackson, 011ie B 25 4 Parkview 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 3200 Thomas Avenue Dallas, Texas . Moseley, Robina B 27 4 ParkvieW 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 2613 Lena rtaii v ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF FITZI STREET FROM VILLAGE- CREED RD. TO WEER STREET (WEST) PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 12 OF 14 PAGE No. 26 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONFRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO W OF APPARENT OWNER p FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER �� FRONT FEET ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS 6W FOR AGAINST1 CLI N W National Credit Corporation B E. 59' of 6 4 ER Parkview 59 5.87 346.33 159.30 59 1915 Live Oak Dallas, Texas Turner, Carrie B W. 118' of 4 it 118 5.87 692.66 540.00 118 2602 Dillard 6 (250.00) Talker, Manse B 29 4 of 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 2604 Lena Watkins, Charlie B 26 4 of 50 5.87 293850 270.00 P 50 5023 Fitzhugh Williams, J. C. B E. 138' of 1 8 Sunrise 138 5.87 810.06 540.00 138 4925 Fitzhugh Williams, J. C. B 22 8 " 218 5.87 1,279.66 637.20 218 -4925 Fitzhugh Williams, Ward B C 1 Grove Hill 66 5.87 387.42 356.40 66 C/o R. P. Eeies 206 Dan Waggoiier Building Wilson, Ernest B 23 4 Parkview 50 5.87 293.50 293.50 P 50 4620 Avenue J Wright, Rev. Clabe B 28 4 to 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 5013 Draper Street Total 1,476.7 8,668.23 6,347.98 150 636.7 690,0 r Parcels 19 Pr® osed adj ted a sessments 6,057.98) Owners 17 r City of Fort Worth, Texas Mayor and Council Communication DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving at 14 Locations PAGE NUMBER in the Dunbar School Area, Projec 3/29/65 C-476 No. 097-24000-137 1of 3 Council action on the project described below is requested: Project Description Nature of work: Assessment Paving at 14 Locations in the Dunbar School Area, as described below: Roadway Unit Street Limits Width R.O.W. 1) Cox Street Dillard Street to Burger Street 30' 50' 2) Cox Street Burger Street to Stalcup Road 30' 50' 3) Dillard Street Cox Street to Turner Street 30' 50' 4) Dillard Street Turner Street to Pinson Street 30' 50' 5) Burger Street Turner Street to Pinson Street 30' 50' 6) Pinson Street Village Creek Road to Walker Street 30' 50' 7) Pinson Street Walker Street to Dillard Street 30' 50' 8) Pinson Street Dillard Street to Burger Street 30' 50' 9) Pinson Street Burger Street to Stalcup Road 30' 50' 10) Lena Street Cottey Street to Fitzhugh Street 30' 50' 11) Fitzhugh Street Langston Street to Village Creek Rd. 30' 50' 12) Fitzhugh Street Village Creek Road to Walker Street 30' 50' 13) Fitzhugh Street Walker Street to Dillard Street 30' 50' 14) Vincennes Avenue Willie Street to Dunbar Street 30'-26' 40'-30' Petitions have been received for the paving of the above streets with the exception of Unit 2 - Cox Street, Unit 3 - Dillard Street, and Unit 5 - Burger Street, which were initiated by the City. Unit 2 - Cox Street, and Unit 3 - Dillard Street were added to the ptoject to provide paved circula- tion in the area. Unit 5 - Burger Street, was added to the project to pro- vide adequate drainage in the area. Submission of Bids The following bids were received for the paving project. Bidder Amount of Bid Working Days S.R.O. Asphaltic, Inc. - Arlington $143,135.50 140 R. W. Gibbins, Inc. 145,448.00 140 Texas Bitulithic Company 148,696.75 140 Glade, Inc. 151,133.11 140 W. E. Brittain 155,407.25 140 General Construction 163,866.25 140 Bids have also been received for the Sunrise Addition Storm Drain at Burger Street, for which $35,000 was allotted in the 1965 Capital Improvement Pro- gram. The proposed facility will serve a drainage area including five pe- titioned units, including Units 7, 8, and 9 on Pinson Street, Unit 4 on Dillard Street, and Unit 1 on Cox Street. Two units initiated by the City, Unit 3 on Dillard Street, and Unit 5 on Burger Street, will also be bene- fitted. ti DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving at 14 Locations PAGE NUMBER in the Dunbar School Area, Project 2 3 3/29/65 C-47b 097-24000-137 °� Bidder Amount of Bid Working Days C. L. Buchanan Company $ 31,353.00 30 Feazell Construction, Company 31,751.90 30 Glade, Inc. 32,834.00 30 Brown and Blakney, Inc. 32,851.50 30 Lewis and Lewis 33,607.10 30 E. H. Shaw, Contractor 35,607.10 30 Shandel Construction Company - Dallas 36,760.60 30 T. D. Conatser, Contractor 36,780.30 30 Cunningham and Tibbets 37,372.00 30 Proiect Cost and Financing Based on the low bid, approximately $98,983.53 will be assessed Against abutting property owners. The cost to the city-at-large will be approx- imately $581464.52 for assessment paving and $35,000 for storm drainage, including engineering and miscellaneous expenses. Recommendations , 1) That the following bond fund transfers be approved: Amount $98,983.53 Revolving Fund 042-09724-137 To provide for the property owners ' portion of con- struction cost. $58,465.52 Unspecified Projects 097-24000-137 To provide for City's por- tion of construction, engineering, and miscel- laneous cost. 2) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Declaring the necessity for and ordering the improvements ; b) Making provisions for levying of assessments ; c) Ordering the Public Works Department to prepare estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; d) Awarding the contract to S.R.O. Asphaltic, Inc. on its low bid of $143,135.50; and, e) Making appropriations to cover the indebtedness thereby incurred for the improvements to the project named above. 3) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Approving the estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; and, r SUBMITTED BY: A I DISPOSITION '�CODNCIL: HER (DESCRIBE) PROCESSED By A,5t55MtN1 HULLS FOR PAVING OF FITZInIGH STREET FROM VILLAGE. CREEK RD. TO WAXER STREET (WEST) PROJECT No. 097=24000=137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 12 OF 14 PAGE No. 26 OF 30 NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT oo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY T RATE GROSS ASSESSED OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z~ FRONT FEET n+ LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS NaFOR AGAINST ANSW ER National Credit Corporation B E. 59' of 6 4 Parkview 59 5.87 346.33 159.30 59 1915 Live Oak Dallas, .Texas Turner, Carrie B W. 118' of 4 It 118 5.87 692.66 540.00 118 2602 Dillard 6 (250.00) Walker, Manse B 29 4 to 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 2604 Lena Watkins, Charlie B 26 4 of 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P 50 5023 Fitzhugh Williams, J. C. B E. 138' of 1 8 Sunrise 138 5.87 810.06 540.00 138 4925 Fitzhugh Williams, J. C. B 22 8 218 5.87 1,279.66 637.20 218 4925 Fitzhugh Williams, Ward B C 1 Grove Hill 66 5.87 387.42 356.40 66 c/o R. P. Edits 206 Dan Waggoimer Building Wilson, Ernest B 23 4 Parkview 50 5.87 293.50 293.50 P 50 4620 Avenue J Wright, Rev. Clabe B 28 4 it 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 p 50 `a 5013 Draper Street Total 1,476.7 8,668.23 r6,057.98) 47.98 150 636.7 690.0 r Parcels 19 Pr® csed adj ted a sessments Owners 17 ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Fitzhugh Street FROM Walker Street (W)TO Dillard Street PROJECT No. 09724000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT NO-13 OF 14 PAGE No. 27 OF 30 NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION o AMOUNT ZZ RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY W FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Z W~— FRONT FEET OF APPARENT OWNER FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z n�i LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na V FOR AGAINST ANSWER Asher, Floyd C. B A 1 Grove Hill 68 5.87 399.16 367.20 P* 68 C/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner wilding Carter, Rev. H. B. B W. 440 of S. Hollis Sub. 44 5.87 258.28 237.60 P 44 5100 Turner 120.70 of Lot 5 Chadwick, Mary B 14 5 Parkview 49.3 5.87 289.50 266.32 49.32 5105 Fitzhugh Chadwick, Mary B 15 5 Parkview 47 5.87 275.89 253.80 47 5105 Fitzhugh Collard, Pearline B 9 5 Parkview 75 5.87 440.25 405.00 75 5033 Fitzhugh Davis, Jessie B 12 & 13 5 Parkview 100 5.87 587.00 540.00 100 5113 Fitzhugh Street Estes, R. P. & Turpin, G. W. B 18 2-B Grove Hill 121 5.87 710.27 540.00 P* 121 c/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner Estes, R. P. & Turpin,, G. W. B 21 2-B Grove Hill 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P* 50 C/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner Estes, R. P. & Turpin, G. W. B 22 2-B Grove Hill 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P* 50 C/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner A11Al,tiMtN1 "U. ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF FiTZHUGH STREET FROM WAVER S_`2EETNEST) TO DILLARD STREET PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A-P- 64-133 UNIT Ne. 13 OF 14 PAGE No-28 OF 30 NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DEiSCRIPTICK AMOUNT 00 RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY w FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED w— OF APPARENT OWNER p FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER ZF— FRONT FEET n� LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST NO Estes, R. P. & Turpin, G. W. B 23 2-B Grove Hill 50 5.87 293.50 270 ,00 P* 50 c/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner Estes, R P. & Turpin, G. W. B 24 2-B " 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P* 50 c/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner Estes, R. P. & Turpin, G. W. B 25 2-B " 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P* 50 c/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner Estes, R. P. & Turpin, G. W. B 26 2-B " 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P* 50 c/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner Estes, R. P. & Turpin, G. W. B 27 2-B 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 P* 50 c/o R. P. Estes 317 Dan Waggoner Estes, R. P. & Turpin, G. W. B 1 2-B 120 5.87 704.40 540,00 120 c/o R. P. Estes (500.00) 317 Lan Waggoner Harris, George W. B E. 44' of W. Hollis Sub. 44 5.87 258.28 237.60 P 44 5133 Meadowbrook Drive 88' of S. 120.7' of 5 Harris, George W. B E. 44' of W. of 44 5.87 258.28 237.60 P 44 5133 Meadowbrook Drive 132' of S. 120,7' of 5 *Petition s' signed by persons buyi property on zontract of sale, ATTACHMENT "C" ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF FITZR'X STREET FROM WAi R ST. (WEST TO D1L1 STREET PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64133 UNIT No. 13 OF 14 PAGE No. 29 OF 30 AMOUNT Z NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED Wo RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER Z- 0 RONT FEET ni LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST ANSNO WER -Rriynes Chapel No. 2 8 E. 63° of S. Hollis Sub. 63 51.87 369.81 340 20 63 Church of God in wrist 120.71 of 5 X5133 Fitihuugh McKnight, John R 16 5 Farkview 47 5.87 275.89 2.53.80 47 936 E. Leuda Street ,les, Adell E 20 2-B Grove Ril 50 5.87 293.50 270.00 50 c/® R. P. Estes 317 Damm Waggoner Mitchell, Jerome E N 50° of S. 9 5087 557.65 461.;70 P 95x0 5141 Fitzhugh Street 1121 ®f W�951 of 6 Osby, Oscar E R 1 Grove Rill 66 87 387 42 356.40 P 66 5034 Fi tzhusugh Rosa, Pearlie E. 8 10 5 Parkview 5 87 293,50 270 00 P 50 5121 Fitzhugh Selman, Loyd 5117 Fitzhugh Street E 11 5 50 5 87 293 50 270 00 Tubb, Vernon c/o R. P. Estes E 19 2=R Grove Rill 87 293.50 27006 317 Dara Waggoner Wright, George 8 N. .508 of Sc Mollis Saab. 100 5.81 587 00 108.00 100 5004 Ramey Street 621 of E.1008 of 6 *Petition was signed by person4 bu ing property o coact act of sale. 1,633.32 9,587.58 8,115022 190.0 759.0 684.32 Proposed adjustid assessment (8,074.22 Parcels` 26 Owners 16 ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING OF Vincennes Street FROM Willie Street TO N. Line of Lot 1j Block 12 PROJECT No. 097-24000-137 A.P. 64-133 UNIT No. 14 OF 14 PAGE No. 30 OF 30 AMOUNT z RESULT OF POST CARD SURVEY NAME AND ADDRESS W PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT RATE GROSS ASSESSED WO OF APPARENT OWNER zo FEET PER AMOUNT AFTER z� FRONT FEET N LOT BLK. ADDITION FOOT ASSESSED CREDITS Na FOR AGAINST NO Berry, John B 8 6 Stallup 1st Filina 50 5.87 293.50 135.00 50 1825 Vera Mathews, Milton H. B 7 6 Stallup 1st Filibg 50 5.87 293.50 135.00 50 2401 E. Lancaster McNally, Grace B 6 6 Stallup 1st Fili o, 50 5.87 293.50 135.00 50 3771 Wayside McNally, J. C. B 5 6 Stallup 1st Fii-ing 50 5.87 293.50 135.00 50 3771 Wayside .� Miller, Eugene G. B C-R Prince 63 5.87 369.81 340.20 P 63 1919 Vincennes Miller, Millie Governor B A-R Prince 63 5.87 369.81 340.20 P 63 1905 Vincennes Ave. Prince, 3. R. B TR. 36-B D. Dulaney 90 5.87 528.30 232.20 90 1072 E. Terrell Survey Roney, Edward Lee B B-R Prince 63 5.87 369.81 340.20 P 63 1909 Vincennes Stone, Robert L. B 1 Prince 125 5.87 733.75 540.00 125 813 Glen Garden Drive Wilson, Bill B 7 Stallup 1st Fiili g 140 5.87 821 .80 486-00 140 1908 Oakland �S Total 744.0 4,367.28 2,818,80 63 415 26'6