HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 18518-03-2009ORDINANCE NO. 18518-03-2009
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35. "WATER AND
SEWERS". OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH
(1986) AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING ARTICLE III
"CHARGES", DIVISION 2 'WATER AND WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEES", EXHIBIT A, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
INTO SECTION 35-70.2(A); FURTHERMORE, BY AMENDING
EXHIBIT B, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTION
35-70.2(B); FURTHER, BY AMENDING SCHEDULE 1,
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35-70.3(A);
FURTHER, BY AMENDING SCHEDULE 2, INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35-70.3(B). FURTHER, BY
AMENDING EXHIBIT C, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
INTO SECTION 35-71(A); FURTHER, BY AMENDING EXHIBIT
D, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35-72(A);
FURTHER, BY AMENDING EXHIBIT E, INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35-76(A); FURTHER, BY
AMENDING EXHIBIT F, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
INTO SECTION 35-77(A); MAKING THIS ORDINANCE
CUN1ULATtVE OF PRIOR ORDINANCES AND REPEALING ALL
ORDINANCES AND PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY
OF FORT N),ORTIJ IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 395.052 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the
City to review and update its current Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements
Plans related to water and wastewater facilities and impact ties;
WHEREAS. on February` 20. 2009, the City made available to the public, copies
of the proposed amended Land Ise Assumptions and capital lnipro,,emcnts Plans related
to water and wastewater fidcihties and impact fees.-
WHLREAS, roquin:d b% NeoI
ion 395.050`he C 15 ifjl hm�11wC1TwT1t Ae""-
slt,y
Colnmlittce submitted its mitten comimnus on the to the Land tJ;,C
Assumptions and Capnal finprovcment� Plans on March 5, 2(,)09�
WHEREAS. Section 395.054 of the Texas Local Government Code also
requires the City to conduct a Public hearing to discuss an ordinance amending the Land
Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must approve the proposed amendments to the
Land Use Assumptions and Capital improvements Plans related to water and wastewater
facilities and impact tees within 10 days of such public hearineg,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers", Article III "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees-, Division 2 "Water
and Wastewater Impact Fees", Section 35-70.2(a), Exhibit A, "Land Ilse Assumptions
for Water", incorporated by reference, is hereby further amended to be and read as shown
on Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION 2.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 15
"Water and Sewers". Article III "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees", Division 2"Water
and Wastewater Impact Fees-, Section 35-70.2(b), Exhibit 13, "Land U'se Assumptions
for Wastewater", incorporated by reference is hereby further amended to be and read as
shown on Exhibit 13, attached hereto.
SECTION 3,
Pao I! o1 the Code of ttse Cjjv (qf t1t)rj 'k,ortlj, 1'exa s (p)8(1), as ZIMVIIded, Chapm Is
-Warer and Sewers", Article III "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees", Division 2 -Water
and Waslcwaler In"Pawt Fxhibit C. "Water Bci;cfit Area",
incorporated by reference, is hereby further arriended to be and read as shown on Exhibit
C. attached hereto.
SECTION 4.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Tcxas (1986), as amended, Chapter 15
Water and Sewers". Article III "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees", Division 2 'Water
and Wastewater Impact Fees ", Section 35-72(a), Exhibit D, "Water Capital
Improvements Plan", incorporated by reference, is hereby further amended to be and read
as shown on Exhibit D, attached hereto.
SECTION 5.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1980), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers". Article III "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees". Division 2 "Water
and Wastewater Impact Fees", Section 35-76(a), Exhibit E, "Wastewater Benefit Area",
incorporated by reference, is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on Exhibit
E. attached hereto.
SECTION 6.
Part If of the ('Ode of the City of Fort Worth, 'I exas (1136), as amended, Chapter 11;
I-
"Water and Sewers", Article III "Water and Wastewater Impact Fees, Division 2 "Water
and Wastewater Impact Fees", Section 35-77(a), Exhibit F, "Wastewater Capital
Improvement-, Plan". incorporated by reference, is hetcbv farther amended to be and read
as shown on Exhibit F, attached hereto,
SECTION 7.
TI iis ord A nza cv si'ffl I he cuinlullatilc idlAl I pro 601l< Of'01,dinanccs :,led clf flie Ctm4e oftfle
CAV of 1 )IT Woith, Tex&, (11986), as amended, except Svhcrc the prv- sionI of this
oolinance are in diject conflicl vv�fll the ptovisTous or Buell oldillances and such Code, ill
which c,�Qra Corfflictju�(, Provisions Of Such (ndiflal)CCS WId such ('Ode JTV herebv
et ea cwt.
SECTION 8.
It is hereby declared to he the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and, if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section off this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the
valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining phrases-, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and section
of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without
the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence.,
paragraph or section.
SECTION 9.
This ordinance shall be effective upon adoption and publication as required by law.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
A
1rista 4�Re� iolds
Assistant City Attorney
ADOPTED: March 24, 2009,
FORTWOATH
' O"%*011pre" City of Fort Worth
Exhibit A
Fort Worth
Land Use Assumptions
Water Facilities
Wqnod Ellreparcd Hy:
Table nfContents
Contents
11
Introduction ... .--........ ...... .... ___ ......... ......... .... ... .... — ....
----------..—A-1
12
Water Service Area ............ ....... ... ....... .— ............ ... — ......................
---.......... A-1
13,
Population and Employment Projections .......... —.--- .........
... — ........ --.. ...... /43
/..x/. ........ ................ ............. ...........
—.............. ....... .... —.f+3
1.32. Wholesale Cootomer*— ............... — ....... ..... —.—. ...
-- ... .... .. ____ ........ _/45
1.3.3. Unincorporated Area. ..... ......... .... —`.----.,.— ...
....... --..— ............ 8,8
List of Tables
Ar1 —Fort Worth's Population and Employment Pnojextions ........ --......... ................ 8.5
8`2— Wholesale Customers Population and Employment Served by Fort Worth ... ...... .... —._A-G
List »fFigures
Exhibit C— Water Service Area (including Water Benefit Area)
Figure A-2—CCNo
List of Appendices
A. Certificate uf Convenience and Necessity Index
B. Wholesale Customer Surveys
C. Wholesale Customers Population and Employment Forecast for 20O8'2O19 and 2O29
, nmmoxwm��,mw*m�mwn
�
� � m� �
um*umm !«�i
Exhibit A
Water Facilities Land Use Assumptions
is Mff =0 O-ff M 6=1
The Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395 authorizes apolitical subdivision, such
as the City of Fort Worth (City), to impose impact fees on new development within its
corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Chapter 395 requires the
political subdivision imposing an impact fee to update its land use assumptions and
capital improvements plan every five years.
'The City has updated its water land Use assumptions and capital improvements plan in
1993, 1996, 1999, and 2004. This report updates the water facilities land use
assumptions for the years 2009, 2019 and 2029. This information will be used in the
update of the water impact fees.
1.2. Water Service Area
The City Water Department provides water service to retail and wholesale customers
within the Water Service Area. The Water Service Area is defined in Chapter 395 ofthe
Texas Local Government and in Chapter 35 of the City of Foil Worth Code of
Ordinances as the Water Benefit Area. 'The Water Service Area includes the area within
the City of Fort Worth and its unincorporated E IT to which water Could be provided on a
retail basis and all wholesale water customers. Areas served by other utility providers are
CXC[Ltded from the Water Service Area.
Exhibit C shows the projected Water Service Area boundaries for 2019 and 2029. The
Water Service Area includes the City of Fort Worth, wholesale customers, and
unincorporated areas.
The C ity Water Department provides water service to approximately 216,000 (December
2008) retail customers. These Customers consist of residents and business located inside
the city limits.
In addition the City has contracted to provide wholesale water service to 30 wholesale
water customers. It is assume(] that the City will continue to contractually provide water
service to these customers through 2029. 'The City provides contractual emergency use
water service to Beabrookand Sarimmir Park and non-contractual water service to Blue
Mound Ztnd River Oaks. 'Ilse non-confisicniai custorriers arc cxeladed front hind ucc
assumptions and future water facilities, n addition, the City provides water indirectly to
\Vatauga through North Richland Hills.
Al
Vvpm Ya0l�COs i
�I
r{ �
�
YI
I
2
A
v 4
J'C'L
fie° i
a ih
•I
Le°
it a dl
Exhibit A
Water Facilities Land Use Assumptions
The water wholesale contract customers include all or parts of
Aledo
Benbrook
Bethesda Water Supply
Burleson
Crowley
DFW Airport
Dalworthington Gardens
Edgeeliff Village
Everman
Forest Hill
GTand Prairie
Haltom City
Hasler
Hurst
Keller
Kennedale
Lake Worth
Northlake
North Richland Hills
Richland [tills
Roanoke
Saginaw
Sansern Park
Southlake
Trinity River Authority
Trophy Club
Westlake
Westover Hills
Westworth Village
White Settlement
The City also provides water service to unincorporated areas that are not included within
its limits or wholesale customers' city limits. Located in Tarrant, Denton and Wise
counties, these areas are served through a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity
(CCN) and shown in Figure A-2. Appendix A indexes the CCNs shown in Figure A-2.
MM320=
This report section describes the population and employment growth projections in the
Water Service Area, These projections are for the years 2009, 2019, and 2029 and are
primarily based on the Wholesale Customer surveys and the North Central Texas Council
of Governments (NCTCOG) data. Appendix B includes the wholesale customer surveys
The NCTCOG has published two dOCUrnents that include historical and projected
population and employment data for municipalities within the Water Service Area. The
NCTCOG 2008 Estimates Report includes 2000 Census Population. 2007 population
estituates, 2008 population estimates and 2007-2008 growth rates for a number ol'North
Texas cities and counties. The NCTCOG 20:30 Demographic Forecast projects population
and cmployment data f=ar 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2025, and 2030. The rorecast vvas
finafi7ed in 2003 and will be updated in fate 2009.
1.3,1. City o port Worth
Red Oak analyzed projected population and employment information lot the City of Fort
Worth from the City and NCTCOG. Red Oak projected population and employment
six RBOAK, raur "4cs-h IhIme,
and k L'u, A-,-or;rnins A 3
LI 1,
%..
nn
r.-.2
Aw
NL v
10
o
10A
11
rj
un i d 1 11
17--' r — , o , — ,
I
a
1
i
J _ _
r
! I
ce'
•
i �
4
!
i
1
_ 4 1
r r
•• 1
I
�•�
!
r
Iii
i
_
_ _
J -
_
i .'' I - I
i
I
a
i
J _ _
! I
ce'
•
i �
4
i
1
_ 4 1
�•�
!
r
Iii
i
_
_ _
J -
_
i .'' I - I
I L!
!
!
n
..
J J �
- I
1 =1
R
L R
1 I
� 1 1
Y
. i
L
! i
r-
` is a
n °
. Y
_ .. lh_ 14n •
_
I
_ -
1
.!
1
r
F4
,
I
I
Exhibit A
Water Facilities Land Use Assumptions
' "' of s and
Index Necessity
RAT WORTH
. ' wPNLeb
--- -3
.i
Water Facilities Land Use Assumptions
APPENDIX B: Wholesale Customer Surveys
Rom,
* iTtNG Land vM era, M .
♦ e ° ���M�q� W h. SYk�naMn. j'{$i 1.1' P Q jM am..
FORTW" WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
'wtA WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer City of Fort Worth
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
M��
16-1
N=N=MMWM#,
M Film M.#
2009
149
0ff=�MEMMff,"#M1
2018
196
MGD
M��
16-1
N=N=MMWM#,
MGD
2009
149
0ff=�MEMMff,"#M1
2018
196
MGD
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
97101A
Existing
144
MGD
2009
149
MGD
2018
196
MGD
2028
248
MGD
Max Day
Existing
296
MGD
200•
306
MGD
2018
408
MGD
2028
466
MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
100 %
2009-----T0-0%
2018
100 %
2028
100 %
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year.
am
Page I of 2
0
Yes
No
FoRT WoRTH WATER PROJECTIONS O. IMPACT J
WATER
Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/8"
172,557
3/4"
21,144
1"
1,711
1-1/2"
528
2"
Number of non - Residential water meters at present
1
5/8"
7,486
3/4"
3,169
1"
2,154
1 -1/2"
5,715
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
518"
88,125
3/4"
152,657
1"
281,960
1 -1/2"
609,599
2"
741
3"
344
4"
273
6"
110
8"
30
10"
10 Annual Non - Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
88,055
5/8"
88,055
3/4"
252,626
1"
583,858
1 -1j2-
1,446,824
2"
0 3 . .............
0 4"
0 6"
0 V
0 10"
1,962,278
3"
5,756,288
4"
7,840,926
6"
7,732,244
- 8°
60,859,732
10"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? y c s
Note: The Information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009 -2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please he advised that an additional water survey for a separate Plaster Plan study may be required
along with this survey Any comments or concerns should ba; directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak
Consultants (972) 663 - 2'"67.
zi5
Page 2 of 2
FoRTWoffrif WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Aledo
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
M
I Employment Projections
I Existing
i 7101
2018
1,590
1 20091
9131
20281
2,500
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Existing
2009
2018
2028"
0.342
0.342
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing 0 %
2009 0 %
2018 100 %
2028 100 —%
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year,
6 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
U5 1 MGD
-io-fo) Year
Yes X
F
Max Day
MGD
Existing
0.484 MGD
MGD
2009
0.484 MGD
MGD
2018
MGD
MGD
2028
MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing 0 %
2009 0 %
2018 100 %
2028 100 —%
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year,
6 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
U5 1 MGD
-io-fo) Year
Yes X
F
FoRT WoRni WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
WATM
Number of residential water meters at present.
779 5/81,
0 3/4"
4 V
0 1-1/2" —
0 2"
Number of non-Residential water meters at present
80 5/81,
0 3/4"
7
2
17
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
86,868,289
5/8'.
0
3/4"
154,000
11.
0
1-1/2"
0
2"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
10.1
0
4
3
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
V
0
0
0
0
0
3"
V
6"
8"
101,
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
743,000
5/81,
0
3/4"
1,322,790
V
27,780
1-1/2"
4,835,800
21,
311,620
3"
2,164,670
4"
0
6"
0
a.
0
10.1
It Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Note: the information provided above will be used to project the Lance Use Assumptions for the
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along with this survey. Any comments or concerns should be directed to Jennifer Ive . with Red Oak
i y
Consuftviu (9 121663-1167-
Page 2 of 2 f.
t. t• WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
wA� WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STU
OCTOBER 2008 •
Wholesale Customer Benbrook Water Authority
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existing
1 23,450
20181
30,400
20091
23,6501
20281
34,480
LE
I Employment Projections
I Existing
i 4,79
Max Day
557
1 20091
5,0001
20281
10,;F35
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey
Avg Day
0
%
Max Day
0
%
Existing
4.5
MGD
Ex ! Isting
8.0
MGD
2009
4.7
MGD
2009
8.5
MGD
2018
6
MGD
2018
10
MGD
2028
8.5
MGD
2028
18.1
MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
0
%
2009
0
%
2018
0
%
2028
0
%
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Page 1 of 2
INWMI
yes
No EEI
FoRTW
{' WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS * IMPACT
11-1111.1 WATER
Number of residential water meters at present.
5,140
5/8"
43
3/4"
2,429
1"
10
1 -1/2"
85
2"
8 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
147
5/8"
7
3/4"
151
1"
42
1 -1/2"
94
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
512,104,182
5/8"
7,277,831
3/4"
383,434,756
1"
5,709,215
1 -1 /2"
92,522,603
2"
27
0
0
0
0
3"
4'u
— ... "6"
a°
30"
903,951
12
1
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
10 Annual Non - Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
10,781,567
5/8"
903,951
3/4"
40,946,717
— _V
28,388,597
— —11/2"
11,272,791
2"
35,301,561 3"
0 4„
0 -- 6"
0 — 8"
0 10"
18,435,208
3"
33,724,364
4"
0
6"
0
8"
0
10"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Note: The information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009 -2034 Fort Worth Water impact fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along with this survey Any comments or concerns should be directed to iennift-r Ivey, with iced Oak
(omaf it inF (972j t- 63 -21b T
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Bethesda Water Supply Corp
& Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October lV08)
N{3C0G Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
�
LE
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based wn prior Wholesale Customer Survey
Avg Day
70
Y6
Max Day
70
%
Existing
3'4
m160
LE
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based wn prior Wholesale Customer Survey
Avg Day
70
Y6
Max Day
70
%
Existing
3'4
m160
Existing
9.6
01GB
2009
IS
K8GD
2009
102
WY6D
2818
4A
KxGD
2018
12.4
yW6D
2028
5.5
KA6D
2028
15.5
MGD
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated tmbmserved by Fort Worth
Existing
70
Y6
2003
70
%
2018
85
%
2028
100
%
4 Will you need m larger mr additional meter? Yes
No
5 Amount uf water need and starting year.
L 2015 Year
W Will your service boymddmsbm expanding Y yes
No
Page I of 2
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Number of residential water meters at present.
9,310
5/81,
23
3/4"
51
It,
7
1-1/2"
16
2"
Number of non-Residential water meters at present
5/8"
3/4"
2"
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
1300952400
5/811
7436400
3/4'l
21812400
It,
4320400
1-1/2"
30975600
2"
0
1
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
81,
10.1
3"
4"
6"
81,
101,
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/81,
3/4"
0 Tl
558000 4"
0 6"
0 all
0 lot,
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? NZA
Note: This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Cowwiting (972) 663-2167,
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Burleson
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
F—: Employment Projections
Existing
I
l 6,546
20181
8,774
1 20091
6,7061
20281
15,492
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
21
a
Avg Day
Existing
4.335
2009
2009
4.68
—MGD
MGD
2018
7.091
MGD
2028
10.536
MGD
2028
Max Day
100 %
2009
Existing
9.4
MGD
2009
11.08
MOD
2018
15.76
MGD
2028
20.88
MGD
The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
100 %
2009
100 %
2018
100 %
2028
100 %
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Yes
No
1 101 MGD
2020 Year
6 Will your service boundries be expanding Yes
N E
o l
Number mf residential water meters atpresent.
Number of non-Residential water meters a&present
loll
0
0
29
ill
0
101,
180
2"
Number of non-Residential water meters a&present
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
loll
0
0
165
ill
0
101,
180
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
loll
0
0
81f
101.
0
101,
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
173,189,545
5/8"
77,000,000
2"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Note:This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting d otherwise directed, Any comments wr concerns should
be (firected to Jermiley lvoy Willi Red Cak Consulting (972) 663-2167,
Page 2 of
FORT WORTH WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Crowley
I
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
7E
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
U
4
9
0
Avg Day
Existing
1.60
MGD
2009
—�,-#
��Inrfflml
2018
mom Mg.
1111 I I
7E
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
U
4
9
0
Avg Day
Existing
1.60
MGD
2009
2.00
MGD
2018
3.50
MGD
2028
4,00
MGD
Max Day
Existing
1.60
MCI
2009
1.60
MG1
2018
If
MGD
2028
2.00
MGD
The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
80 %
2009
80 %
2018
90 %
2028
90 %
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Page 1 of 1
Yes
No
Yes
No
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUJ
WATER
Number of residential water meters at present.
0
s /8"
4,777
3/4"
25
1"
2
1 -1/2"
3
2"
Number of non- Residential water meters at present
0
5 /8"
152
3/4"
47
1'
14
1 -1/2"
46
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/81,
342,279,082
3/4"
8,307,000
1"
1,089,000
1 -1 /2"
218,000
2"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
635,000
10
1
0
0
0
3"
4"
6
8"
10"
6"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
— 8"
10"
10 Annual Non - Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
23,100,000
3"
635,000
4"
0
6"
0
8"
0
10"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Nate; The information provided above will be used to project the Fand Use Assumptions for the
2009 -2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along with this survey. Any comments or conccxrns should be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Reed Oak
Consultin,, (972) afj63- 21.67,
Page 2 of 2 ?•',
N4WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STU
OCTOBER 2008 1
Wholesale Customer Dalworthington Gardens
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Exi
MGD
2009
2,875
1 20091
2,4001
20281
3,
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Existing
0.46
MGD
2009
0.469
MGD
2018
0.568
MGD
2028
0.705
MGD
Z=A
Existing
0.103
MGD
2009
0.105
MGD
2018
0.124
MGD
2028
0A55
—MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
N
0
M
Existing
67 %
2009
67 %
2018
67 %
2028
67 %
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
wmmmY���
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
I I
Yes
No [;�]
FoRTWoRTH WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
WATER
7 Number of residential water meters at present.
5/8"
3/4"
V
1-1/2"
2"
Number of non-Residential water meters at present
5/8"
3/4"
V
1-1/2"
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/8'l
3/4"
2"
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/8"
3/4"
2"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
3"
4"
6"
81.
101,
Note: The information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee Study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along with this survey. Any comments or concern, should be directed to,)ennifer wev, with Red Oak
Comultiog 19 '7)) 661 21•7,
Page 2 of 2
3"
4"
6"
81,
101,
3"
4"
Vt
81,
101,
3"
4"
6"
811
101.
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/8"
3/4"
2"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
3"
4"
6"
81.
101,
Note: The information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee Study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along with this survey. Any comments or concern, should be directed to,)ennifer wev, with Red Oak
Comultiog 19 '7)) 661 21•7,
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer EverI[an
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October Z0V8)
NCT{0G Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
I Employment Projections
I Existingi
1,4801
20181
1,661
1 20091
1,559
1 20281
1,6901
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based *m prior Wholesale Customer Survey
Avg Day
Max Day
Existing
0.5
MGD
Existing
1.1
MGD
%VOq
0.5
MGD
2009
IJ
k8GD
2018
0.6
M6D
2018
1J
K860
I028
06
&4GD
2028
1.5
KA6D
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing O %
2009 D %
2018 10 %
2028 10 %
4 Will you need a larger nr additional meter? Yes
No
5 Amount of water need and starting year. JUNK _
FUN—C--
U / �
NK YwmH
G Will your service bmwnWrieyhu expanding 7 Yes
No
Page I of 2
Number of residential water meters at present.
Number of water meters atpresent
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
lot,
161,054,000
3/4"
lot,
0
101,
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
lot,
0
lot,
0
101,
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Per Ft, Worth contract and ernent
Note: This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting h otherwise directed, Any comments mr concerns should
b, directed \o Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting ($7l)6612167,
Page 2nfl
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Grand Prairie
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October ZV08)
Q[TC06- Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
n��
Employment Projections
Existing]_
ff
;NGD
1 20181
122,179
20091
107,226
1 20281
125,866
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
���
Existing
2.2
;NGD
2009
23
mYGD
2018
3.2
&4GD
2028
33
Nv6D
Max Day
Existing
2009
2018
'
2028
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing 5.6 %
2009 5 %
2018 6 %
2028 4 %
4 Will you need a larger m, additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year.
6 Will your service bamwdriesbe expanding Y
Page 1of 2
Zf
yN6V
2.5
W16D
IS
N1GD
3,5
k86D
E �
ye�i
No
Number of residential water meters at present.
41,570
5/84
589
2'l
Number of non-Residential water meters at present
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons 5,112,929,000
1"
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons 2,169,031,000
EM
IM
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
T'
A
�r
Note: This information provided above will be used tnproject the Land Use Assumptions for the 2V09`20I4
Fort Worth impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any cnrnnoeuts or concerns should
be ifirected to Jennifer Ivey, with Rod Oak Consulting (972) 663-2167,
Page 2 of 2
0
101,
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons 5,112,929,000
1"
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons 2,169,031,000
EM
IM
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
T'
A
�r
Note: This information provided above will be used tnproject the Land Use Assumptions for the 2V09`20I4
Fort Worth impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any cnrnnoeuts or concerns should
be ifirected to Jennifer Ivey, with Rod Oak Consulting (972) 663-2167,
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER rr.
Wholesale Customer Haltom City
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
n
rr
I I
rrr
rr"
_ -,_i rl
Emww
Ilr
LN
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Existing
5.2
ENU#T# I#
2009
6.5
rr•
rr
7
r rrr
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Existing
5.2
MGD
2009
6.5
MGD
2018
7
MGD
2028
8
MGD
u=*
Existing
2009
2018
2028
11
13
14.5
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing 100 %
2009 100 %
2018 100 %
2028 100 %
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year.
6 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
Page I of 2
MGD
MGD
MGD
MGD
Number of residential water meters atpresent.
K Number of non-Residential water meters atpresent
101,
769,139,818
3/4"
37
V
211
2"
K Number of non-Residential water meters atpresent
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
101,
769,139,818
3/4"
101,
211
2"
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
*& Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, ge|lumo
101,
769,139,818
3/4"
101,
*& Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, ge|lumo
0
101,
632,665,500
3/4"
101,
0
101,
0
101,
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? Yes
Note: This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-Z014
Fort Worth hopact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed, Any comments or concerns should
lie directed to lennifer Nev, with Red Oak Consultnig (9)),) 661-2167.
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
U4,1ZA"
XRtt i ` M I
Wholesale Customer Haslet
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Exist!
MGD
2009
500
20091
1,620
f 20281
4,700
a
Employment Projections
Existi
MGD
2009
0.45
1 20091
1,320 1
20281
3,600
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Existing
0.41
MGD
2009
0.45
—MGD
MGD
2018
126
MGD
2028
5
MGD
Existing
1.49
MGD
2009
1.5
MGD
2018
4.5
MGD
2028
10
MGD
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
4
61
5
Existing
2009
2018
2028
95 %
95 %
100 %
100 %
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Will your service Laundries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
5 MGD
20M Year
yes
No
EEI
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/8"
573
3/4"
15
1.1
0
1-1/2"
0
2"
8 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
0 5/8"
22 3/4"
8
4
43 2"
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/81,
162,978
3/4"
172,305
1.1
0
1-1/2"
0
2"
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/81,
108,222
3/4"
181,338
420,235
3"
4"
6"
8"
101,
1,076,128
2"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
81,
lot,
4
0
0
0
0
3"
Wt
6"
8"
lot,
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
8"
101,
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes
Note: This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (9721663-2167,
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer City of Hurst
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October Z808)
NCTC0G- Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
�
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based mo prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
ZTWA
Existing�
2009
2018:
Max em
MI
Is
Day
95 %
2009
Existing
8.75
N16D
2009
9
NY6D
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based mo prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
ZTWA
Existing�
2009
2018:
Max em
MI
Is
Day
95 %
2009
Existing
8.75
N16D
2009
9
NY6D
2018
9.5
M5D
2828
10
K8GD
3 The Percentage w0your projected water demand anticipated &»be served bV Fort Worth
Existing
95 %
2009
95 %
2018
100 %
2028
100 %
4 Will you need m larger mr additional meter? Yes
No
5 Amount mk water need and starting year.
F-200-T ear
6 Will your service homnddms be expanding yes
No
Page L of 2
7 Number of residential water meters at present.
10,966
5/811
0
3/4"
116
ill
53
1-1/2"
6
2"
6 5"
8 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
575
5/811
0
3/4"
270
Ill
229
1-1/2"
265
2"
2 2.5"
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
1,275,158
5/8"
0
3/4"
18,218
ill
9,017
1-1/2"
5,125
2"
15 5.1
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
3,082,040
Tl
4"
6"
81,
10"
0
25
15
3"
V
6"
81,
10.1
ill
123,380
3"
411
6"
81,
I&
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
3,082,040
5/8.l
0
3/4"
69,100
ill
123,380
1-1/2'.
375,237
2"
232 2.5"
57493
3"
62336
4"
341
6"
8"
101,
It Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes,.. the =. Cif of Hurst t it�.Cacle ti�a�er Zi ttrtictu I! lrnlaac t Fetes
Note: this information provided above will be used to project the tand Use Assumptiore, for the 200T2014
be dire(ted to tr. ntefen ivey, -with Red OA Consulting 072 1 663 216'171
Page 2 of 2
FoRT Wom WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATO WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER-3.na2-
Wholesale Customer Keller
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
sting 1
11,000
2018
12 300
nw•
1/
wlm,
Eff". #I#
I_
Employment Projections
sting 1
11,000
2018
12 300
1 20091
11,1251
20281
14,230
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Max Day
Existing
8.286
MGD
Existing
19.184
MGD
2009
8,458
MGD
2009
19.582
MGD
2018
9.494
MGD
2018
21,981
MGD
2028
10.573
MGD
2028
24.478
MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing 100 %
2009 100 %
2018 100 %
2028 100 %
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year.
6 Will your service boundaries be expanding 7
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
Yes
No EEI
� W , 07�
60RTWO WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
WATER
Number of residential water meters at present.
13059
5 /8"
47
3/4"
164
i"
2
1 -1/2"
6
2"
Number of non - Residential water meters at present
432
5/8"
39
3/4"
250
1"
43
1 -1/2"
233
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
13,719
5/8"
18,763
3/4"
25,743
1"
54,111
1 -1/2"
47,847
2"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
28,551
8
6
0
3
0
3"
4"
6'
8'
10"
1"
0
0
0
0
0
...........
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
10 Annual Non - Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
19,860
5/8"
28,551
3J4"
35,618
1"
74,763
1 -1/2"
74,556
2"
69,585
3"
22,336
4"
0
6"
137,861
8"
0
10"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes.
Note: l "he information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009 -2014 Fort Worth Water Impart Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along with this survey. Any comments or concerns should be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak
Consultin£ ,972166?- 2167..
Page 2 of 2 `y _
ITAOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer City of Kennedale
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
Existing
2,9451
20181
3,51
20091
3,1601
20281
5,176
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Existing
0.811
MGD
2009
0.3
—MGD
MGD
2018
1.2
MGD
2028
1.6
MGD
Existing
1.897
MGD
2009
1.9
MGD
2018
2.8
MGD
2028
3.8
MGD
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
5 %
2009
5 %
2018
12 %
2028
25 %
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year,
6 Will your service boundries he expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Number of residential water meters a&present.
Number of water meters atpresent
101.
229,531,850
0
184
V,
17,207,900
2"
Number of water meters atpresent
0
101.
229,531,850
0
32
V
17,207,900
2"
0
101.
229,531,850
0
101,
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons (+) No* Residential
0 101,
10 AmmmaN*m^ReadmwtimfCmmsmmnpmompewmmeNar, gallon! Not available au such except 3''&4"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes.
Note: This information provided above will be used $o project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2OOS-20I4
Fort Worth hupact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed, Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (977) 6632167
Page 2 of 2
229,531,850
3/4"
55,221,110
V,
17,207,900
2"
0 101,
10 AmmmaN*m^ReadmwtimfCmmsmmnpmompewmmeNar, gallon! Not available au such except 3''&4"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes.
Note: This information provided above will be used $o project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2OOS-20I4
Fort Worth hupact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed, Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (977) 6632167
Page 2 of 2
F W
W,.�w WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WAY" WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STU]
Wholesale Customer Lake Worth
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
�_
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
Max Day
Existing
0.92
MGD
Existing
1.66
MGD
2009
1.30
MGD
2009
1.80
MGD
2018
2.00
MGD
2018
2.90
MGD
2028
2.90
MGD
2028
3.00
MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
0
10
0
Existing
2009
2018
2028
.r
tt
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
W=-7
MGiO
Year
Yes
No }(
rah;
Page 1 of 2 f
FoRTWom
1_1.11l,,,1i1110l'..',,, - WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUJ
WATER
Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5 /8"
1,993
3/4"
139
1"
0
1 -1/2"
1
2"
Number of non - Residential water meters at present
0
5 /8"
142
3/4"
116
1"
39
1 -1/2"
109
2"
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
s /8"
134,974,000
3/4"
9,738,000
1"
0
1 -1/2"
250,000
2"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
10,710,000
5
4
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
s"
10"
i"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6l'
8"
10"
10 Annual Non - Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/8"
10,710,000
3/4"
24,497,000
i"
16,632,000
1 -1/2"
93,769,000
2"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Note: 'T'he information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009 -2014 Fort Worth Water Impact fee study unless Red flak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along with this survey. Any comments or concerns should be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Reel Oak
ClOnsultmg in , 2) 663- 2167,
Page 2 of 2
FORT WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer City of North Richland Hills
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October I0D8)
N(JTOG' Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
68%
Max Day
2018
74,500
1 20091
66,556
1 20281
74,500 1
=1
Employment Projections
68%
Max Day
50%
Existing
20091
29,105
1 20281
34,376
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey
Avg Day
68%
Max Day
50%
Existing
8.026 MGD
6dmUwg
17.517MG0
2009
8871MGD
2009
18218N1G0
2018
12.00NYGD
2018
20.00 M6D
2028
14.00 M6D
2028
2200 h1GD
3
0
0
11
The percentage cf your projected water demand anticipated tvhaserved by Fort Worth
Existing
68%
2009
50%
2018
50 %
2028
0%
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount mf water need and starting year.
Will your service boundaries bw expanding ?
MUMPS
Yes
No
FORTWORTH WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
WAIM
Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/w,
17,932
3/4"
953
1"
10
1 -1/2"
15
2"
Number of non - Residential water meters at present
0
............
5 /8"
_
626
3/4"
324
1"
76
1 -1/2"
710
2"
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/8"
2,027,514,132
3/4"
169,727,117
1"
1,793,794
1 -1/2"
19,029,060
2"
26 _
17
4
0
0
3"
4" �.....
6"
8"
10"
35,262,149
26
17
4
0
0
3"
4"
6"
8„
10"
1"
0
0.......—
0
0
0
3'
4—
- --- 6„
- ---- -8-
10"
10 Annual Non - Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/8"
35,262,149
3/4"
81,260,708
1"
53,480,040
_...___,...._8„
859,493,805
2"
15,464,109
3"
139,515,741
4"
14,310,736
_
6"
0
_...___,...._8„
0
10"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? Yes
Note: The information provided aboves =.vill be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
20091.014 Fort Worth Water Impact Feet study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey For a separate Master plan study may be required
along with this survey. Any comments or concerns should be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red
Oak Consulting (972) 663 -2167.
r ._
Page 2 of I
FORTWO H WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Wholesale Customer Northlake
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existing 1
1,360 2
2018 4
4,450
1 20091 1
1,4501 2
20281 1
500
Employment Projections —1
Existing i 1,1151 20181 3,6501
1 20091 1,1901 �0281 10,2501
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
=A
Existing 0.16 MGD
2009 0.182 MGD
2018 1.135 MGD
2028 3.401 MGD
Max Day
Existing 0.4 MGD
2009 0.455 MGD
2018 2.838 MGD
2028 8.503 MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
4
0
:3
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
Yes
No
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
=A
Existing 0.16 MGD
2009 0.182 MGD
2018 1.135 MGD
2028 3.401 MGD
Max Day
Existing 0.4 MGD
2009 0.455 MGD
2018 2.838 MGD
2028 8.503 MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
4
0
:3
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
Yes
No
Max Day
Existing 0.4 MGD
2009 0.455 MGD
2018 2.838 MGD
2028 8.503 MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
4
0
:3
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
Yes
No
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
4
0
:3
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
Yes
No
Fowftnm WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUJ
WATER
Number of residential water meters at present.
153 5/81l
0 3/4"
0 Ill
0 1-1/2"
0 2"
8 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
0 5/81, –
0 3/4"
16 ill
0 1-1/2"
12 2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
900,000
5/81,
0
3/4"
0
ill
0
—
1-1/2"
0
2"
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
6"
81,
101,
0
13
0
0
0
0
T'
4"
6"
81,
101,
1.1
0
0
0
0
0
3"
4"
61,
8"
Olt
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/81t
0
3/4"
700,000
1.1
0
1-1/2"
3,000,000
2't
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? Ye-,
Note: the information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee Study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water Survey for a separate Master Plan study may be required
along, with this survey. Any comments or concerns should be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak
Cow uftroc' t97'2) 663 -2 [67
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer CitV of Richland Hills
t Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October lO08)
N(TC06 Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existing
1 7902
i0:181
-1,935'
1 20091
7�92
70281
7,936
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
80 %
009
Max Day
2018
90 %
Existing
1
MGD
Existing
1J1
MGD
2009
1.3
M5D
2009
I�2
NGD
2018
l5
K86D
2018
2.55
yNGo
2028
2
K4G0
2078
3
K8G0
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
80 %
009
so %
2018
90 %
2028
100 %
4 Will you need a larger mr additional meter?
$ Amount nf water need and starting year.
6 Will your service bmm"drie,bp expanding ?
Page'l,
Yes
No
Yes Li
No
LLX-
Number uf residential water meters at present.
Number wd non-Residential water meters atpresent
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
81t
1W
232,400,661
3/4"
76
1.1
0
0
81
101,
24,070,900
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
0
81t
1W
232,400,661
3/4"
11,462,098
V
0
0
81
101,
24,070,900
2"
0
0
81t
1W
13,126,298
0
101,
V
0
0
81
101,
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
1,374,200 4"
0 (ill
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes
Qntr:This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting f9 72) 663-2161,
Page 2 of 2
13,126,298
3/4"
18,325,796
V
22,398,598
2"
1,374,200 4"
0 (ill
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes
Qntr:This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting f9 72) 663-2161,
Page 2 of 2
FORTWOM WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer City of Roanoke, Texas
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
g
Existin209
_—
_ 2018
05
6 1
mm-mmamf
1222
MEN W1,�
7441
Employment Projections
g
Existin209
_—
_ 2018
05
6 1
0
1222
20 28
7441
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
3
4
61
2
MISTA
Existing
929,677
MGD
2009
967,237
MGD
2018
1,015,599
MGD
2028
1,066,379
MGD
Max Day
100 %
2009
Existing
2,333,489
MGD
2009
2,427,765
MGD
2018
2,549,153
MGD
2028
2,676,611
MGD
The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
100 %
2009
100 %
2018
100 %
2028
100 %
Will you need a larger or additional meter?
Amount of water need and starting year.
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No X
E 21C
Yes
No EEI
FORTWOM
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUJ
WATER
Number of residential water meters at present.
5/8"
3/4"
ill —
1-1/2"
2"
Number of non-Residential water meters at present
5/8"
3/4"
2"
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/8"
3/4"
ill
1-1/24i —
2"
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/8•1
3/4"
ill
1-1/2"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Note: The information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan Study may be required
along w4h this survey. Any conerients or concerns should be tfiretAed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak
Consulting (977) 663-216T.
Page 2 of 2 t t':
T'
4"
6"
81,
101,
T'
4"
6"
81,
101.
3"
4"
6"
fill
101•
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/8•1
3/4"
ill
1-1/2"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Note: The information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan Study may be required
along w4h this survey. Any conerients or concerns should be tfiretAed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak
Consulting (977) 663-216T.
Page 2 of 2 t t':
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer CitV of Saginaw
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 30V8)
N[TCOG - ForecastDi»hicta
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey
Avg Day
100
%
Max Day
100
%
Existing
2.5
H8SD
Existing
4,3
K8GD
2009
2.7
W1SD
2089
4.32
MGD
2018
5.7
N1GD
2018
10�57
K4GD
2028
5.9
K86D
2028
103
N46Q
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
100
%
2009
100
%
2018
180
%
2028
100
%
4 Will you need a larger o* additional meter? Yes
No
S Amount of water need and starting year, MGD
Year
6 Will your service bwmwddeome expanding ? Yes
No El
Page I of 2
Number of residential water meters at present.
5/81,
6456 3/4"
2"
Number of non-Residential water meters at present
5/81,
87 3/4"
102 V
9 1-1/2"
95 2"
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/8"
644220000
3/4"
3"
4-f
6"
8.1
101.
if,
382700
3"
4"
61,
81,
101,
116522000
2"
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
3"
4"
6"
8"
101,
15246000
9
3"
4-f
6"
8.1
101.
if,
382700
3"
4"
61,
81,
101,
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
It Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes
Note; This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak ConAdtinil, (972) 663-2167,
Page )f of 2
5/8"
15246000
3/4ff
39349000
if,
382700
1-1/2"
116522000
2"
It Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? yes
Note; This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak ConAdtinil, (972) 663-2167,
Page )f of 2
FoRTWon WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer lalsom LPadk
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October ZO08)
NCTCOG' Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
Existinfil
1,050
2018
1,120
1 20041
1,0601
202
1,200
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
O
Max Day
2009
Existing
K4GD
Existing
ANGD
ZOOV
WY5D
2009
M6D
2018
WYGD
2818
K8GQ
2028
yW6D
2028
N16D
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated tmbeserved bV Fort Worth
Existing
O
%
2009
O
%
2018
8
%
2028
U
%
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year.
am
Yes
No
MGD
Year I
Yes
No
FoRTWoRni
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUJ
WATFA
Number uf residential water meters at present.
8 Number of water meters aNpresent
0 ill
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
10l,
IS,141,000
3/4"
0
ill
0
0
lit,
1011
0
10l,
0
ill
0
0
lit,
1011
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
uwm^nmmmd97 Yes
mvhm�Thm|mfurmatKon provided above will hm used k/ project the Land Use Awo.,npita,horthe
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed,
Please hw advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may bmrequired
alwogmikh this survey Any co,w.n+/>t`«x^cwnc*rmsshw«/{dbudirected to]mnnifer Ivey, with Rod Oak
Cousuftio�g (972i t;632161.
page 2m(2
0
ill
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
uwm^nmmmd97 Yes
mvhm�Thm|mfurmatKon provided above will hm used k/ project the Land Use Awo.,npita,horthe
2009-2014 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee study unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed,
Please hw advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study may bmrequired
alwogmikh this survey Any co,w.n+/>t`«x^cwnc*rmsshw«/{dbudirected to]mnnifer Ivey, with Rod Oak
Cousuftio�g (972i t;632161.
page 2m(2
Fmwoffm WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STU
OCTOBER 2008 1
Wholesale Customer Southlake
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
a
Employment Projections
I Existingi
1 20181
24,3
Effigy, M1,
000m,
20281
25,769
a
Employment Projections
I Existingi
1 20181
24,3
1 20091
13,0981
20281
25,769
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
U 7%or
Existing
2009
2018
2028
0.141
11.5
12.8
13.6
MGD
MGD
MGD
MGD
Max Day
100
Existing
26.865
—%
%
2009
28
—MGD
MGD
2018
34
MGD
2028
36
MGD
3 The percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
100
2009
100
—%
%
2018
100
%
2028
100
—%
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
the meter serving South lake/Keller at the Ft Worth Caylor water
tank wit need to be increased a 16" around 2010
6 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No
rORTWORTH WATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Number uf residential water meters at present.
Number *f non-Residential water meters atpresent
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
ill
80 AnwmmNom-ResidentiaUComsuonpmnnpermneKer, gallons
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Note; The information provided above will bm used tw project the I and Use Assumptions for the
l(08'lV14 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee Study uw|msw Red Oak Consulting !u otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study alay be required
along with this survey, Any comments or concerns should be directed to Jennifer wey, with Red Oak
Cferstrifing (972) 663 2167,
Pape 2cf 2 ����(��)���UCll�/"J
all
80 AnwmmNom-ResidentiaUComsuonpmnnpermneKer, gallons
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Note; The information provided above will bm used tw project the I and Use Assumptions for the
l(08'lV14 Fort Worth Water Impact Fee Study uw|msw Red Oak Consulting !u otherwise directed.
Please be advised that an additional water survey for a separate Master Plan study alay be required
along with this survey, Any comments or concerns should be directed to Jennifer wey, with Red Oak
Cferstrifing (972) 663 2167,
Pape 2cf 2 ����(��)���UCll�/"J
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Trophy Club M.U.D.
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2VO8)
N(TCO6 Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
E
%
20181
1,141
1 20091
8551
20281
1,141
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
67
%
Max Day
69
%
ExbMoO
2.15
YNGD
Existing
4.744
yW6D
2009
2.25
KH6Q
2009
5.003
MGU
2018
3,25
K46D
I018
7.343
k860
2028
3.25
Kx6D
2028
7.349
W1G0
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
67
%
2009
69
%
2018
79
Y6
2028
79
%
4 Will you need m larger oo additional meter? Yes
No
B Amount mf water need and starting year. N/A MGD
Year
6 VViV|yomr service hwmndrigs be expanding ? Yes
No E3
Number of residential water meters atpresent.
2479
5/8"
0
252
V
9357000
1-1/2"
5349000
2"
8 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
397466000
5/8"
0
54049900
V,
9357000
1-1/2"
5349000
2"
0
10i,
0
10'i
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
2527000 6"
0 101,
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? Yes
Note: This information provided above will be used toproject the Land Use Assumptions for the ZO0y'2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed. Any comments or concerns should
bm directed tuJennifer Ivey, with Rod Oak Consulting (973)$61^2l67,
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Westlake
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
M
Employment Projections
OR=
�Nmff
=I.
8,193
A
20091
5,65 .
0
1 20281
12,289
M
Employment Projections
Existingl
3,0001
20181
8,193
A
20091
5,65 .
0
1 20281
12,289
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
100
%
Max Day
100
%
Existing
1
—MGD
Existing
3.06
MGD
2009
1.05
MGD
2009
3.21
MGD
2018
1.52
MGD
2018
4.65
MGD
2028
128
MGD
2028
6,98
MGD
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
Existing
100
%
2009
100
%
2018
100
%
2028
100
%
4 Will you need a larger or additional meter?
5 Amount of water need and starting year,
6 Wilt your service boundries be expanding?
Page 1 of 2
Number mf residential water meters atpresent.
Number mK non-Residential water meters a&present
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
5/811
140,305,000
3/4"
183
ill
18,015,000
2"
Number mK non-Residential water meters a&present
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/811
140,305,000
3/4"
219,327,000
ill
18,015,000
2"
10 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/811
82,000
ill
87,256,000
2"
45,104,000 3"
23,389,000 6"
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Note: This information provided above will bc used toproject the Land Use Assumptions for the 2889'l014
Fort Worth Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is otherwise directed, Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consuftuig �1972) 663-2167,
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
Wholesale Customer City of White Settlement
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
7=
2 Projected Avg Day and Max Day water demands based on prior Wholesale Customer Survey.
Avg Day
53
%
Max Day
51
%
Existing
1.8
%
Existing
1.183
MGD
2009
2
—MGD
MGD
2009
2
MGD
2018
2.3
MGD
2018
2.3
MGD
2028
2.6
MGD
2028
2,5
MGD
3 The Percentage of your projected water demand anticipated to be served by Fort Worth
EI
61
M
Existing
53
%
2009
51
%
2018
52
%
2028
53
%
Will you need a larger or additional meter? Yes
Depends on Fort Worth's System and if we drill more wells No
Amount of water need and starting year. L8 MGD
2009 Year
Will your service boundries be expanding ? Yes
No E I
Page 1 of 2
Number uf residential water meters nt present
Number of water meters at present
101,
4795
3/4"
22
V
Number of water meters at present
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gannmy
0
101,
0
31
V
9 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gannmy
0
101,
0
101.
%m Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
11 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community? YVS
Note:'I'lus information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions for the 2009-2014
Fort Worth Impact Fees uo6so Red Oak Consulting |s otherwise directed, Any comments n, concerns sbmwW
bm directed kn Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Crmwmhimg(97I) W63l1WJ,
Page 2 of 2
Water Facilities Land Use Assumptions
F {83 W i
a we t 3 +t fir A. _r- pfis5,�5
- j IL
Z, M,
M-
III P-1 --W
iz�� 7��ERIF FT-2 'i — Mni'
4 1 ----7lFr- 1 11
77m
1 '
n
1
1
L
_
_
VI
u
I
r'I
_
_
AC
P
r
1
IIMIII
P
-
N
i
+
All
�
I
1 I:e
1 'e
�1 �_. _. __ — _
_ ran 1
1• 1
••
r
_
P
.__:c
c ,: t _: '� — e
:: �- -s 'rte
- ca:: a�
�•, -_ 14 _ _
FORTWORTH CityoffortWorth
Exhibit
Fort Worth
• i Use Assumptions
Wastewater • r
2009=2029
IMMINTPM
&. �*I•
evort 3-t£=.{ayt221. ny'
t ��
Table of Contents
1lIntroduction
....... ............. ..................... -----,-----..---------.—.�84
12
Wastewater Service Area ................. — ....... — .............. -------.—.-----.—E-1
13.
Population and Employment Pnojaotiune.--------. .... ...
................ --.......... B-3
1.3.t City ny Fort Worth ................... ... ------ ... ...... ---
........... --------E-3
132, Wholesale Cusbommro .... . .... ..... — ..... ... —. ... ................
------...... E-4
1.3.3, Unincorporated Anea— ........... — ......... --` ... — ..........
----------'8.5
List of Tables
R-1.— Fort Worth's Population and Employment Projections -- ..... .... ............... ... ....... ... E-4
8-2� — Wholesale Customers Population and Employment Served by Fort Worth .... — ............... B-5
List of
Exhibit E — Wastewater Service Area (including Wastewater Benefit Area)
Appendices
A. Wholesale Customer Surveys
& Wholesale Customers Population and Employment Forecast for 2009, 2019 and 2029
^ neV�m*vvu�,nw��mm"�
~�� �����m� pi
Exhibit
Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions
1.1. Introduction
The Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395 authorizes a political subdivision, such
as the City of Fort Worth (City), to impose impact fees on new development within its
corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction (/,"/J). Chapter 395 requires the
political subdivision imposing an impact fee to update its land use assumptions and
capital improvements plan every five years.
The City has updated its wastewater land use assumptions and capital improvements plan
in 1993, 1946, {999, and 2b04. This report updates the wastewater facilities land use
assumptions for the years 20UV,2Q|9 and 2829. This information will bm used iuthe
update ofthmvvnx{evvat*/ impact fees.
1.2" Wastewater Service Area
The City Water Department provides wastewater service to retail and wholesale
customers within the Wastewater Service Area. The Wastewater Service A,l-uis defined
in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government and in Chapter 35of the City ofFort
Worth Code of Ordinances as the Wastewater Flenefit Area. The Wastewater Service
Area includes the area within the City of Fort Worth and its unincorporated Tfi to which
wastewater service could be provided on a retail basis and all wholesale wastewater
customers. Areas served by other utility providers are excluded from the Wao|ev/oicz
Service Area.
Exhibit E shows the projected Wastewater Service Area boundaries for %0lq and 202Y.
The Wastewater Service Area includes the City of Fort Worth, wholesale customers. and
unincorporated areas.
'The City Water provides wastewater service h` approximately 20K/)A
(December 2008) retail customers. These customers consist ofresidents and business
located inside the city limits.
In addition the City has contracted to provide wholesale wastewater service to 23
wholesale wastewater CUStOtners. It is assumed that the City will continue to
contractually provide wastewater service to these customers through'2029
" p�nw��*m��r�m*munwo
.�r
FoRT WORTH
LAW Use As',
Al
IP
-7j
�-T L
I n r
ff
LA M.1
11F &I I- I
441
still,
IIMJ
Le
I
L q 0,'
Exhibit
Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions
The wastewater wholesale contract customers include all or parts of.
Benbmok
Bethesda Water Supply
Blue Mound
Burleson
C,np/!ey
Bdsuc|ifFVillage
Everman
Forest /fill
Haltom City
Hurst
KuoucUulu
Lake Worth
North Richland tills
Pantego
Richland [fills
River Oaks
Saginaw
Suuyonuyurk
Trinity River Authority
Watauga
Westover [lilts
VVnsL*/or(h\/i//ago
White Settlement
The City also provides wastewater service |m unincorporated areas that are not included
within its limits or wholesale customers' city limits.
This report section describes the population and employment growth projections iuthe
Wastewater Service Area. These projections an:fbrthoyooms20O9,20lV,aud 2029 and
are primarily based nu the wholesale customer surveys and the NurLbCtot,"|Tuuo«
Council ol'Governments (NCTCOG) data. Appendix A includes the wholesale customer
surveys.
ll`*hK.TC{)G has published two documents that include historical and projected
population and employment data for municipalities within the Wastewater Service Area.
The NCTr()(}2008bsLi/uuk:o Report includes 2()Q0 Census population, 2087population
estimates, 2008 population estimates and 24O7^2O8% growth rates for o number ofNorth
Texas cities and Counties. Pre NCTtOG20]8Demographic Forecast projects Popula6vn
and *o/Pk`yn)nut data for 20M0,28V5,20|0,20|5,2o]5, and 2Q30. TheK`rcwosiv/ws
l'inalized in 2003 and will be updated in late 2009.
1.3.1. CityofFortWorth
Red Oak population and tuzpkwmxmm(iuftiru`afiaufi�c the city wirod
VYor/h from the City*udNCTC06. Red Oak p Jectedynyula1iuomodeo\pkoyolwnb
numbers |br2OoQ,l()l9, and 2{)29bm:c(]on the 0C7C[>G 2V08 population *'s6/uxromr
Z0D5 employment estimate and using the annual growth rates from the 7V30
Demographic Forecast proJuciiwum, The City's Forecast was reviewed by [Zed Oak and
dctertnined to be appropriate for use in tbis land u-se as,,uniption update as it was within
N°=*°""°'°"°°"WAS
I 1• . i
4
a a .
t
Y
.1
a I
L
1
Y i
.1
. 1
1
1
. i
i-
1
_
r —
c
r
1
-
I-
r
J ...
t
f
m
a [
r
[ a 1
I � m
i
1
a .
�
I °'. I',m "i i 7:
*�• ~i � � cla _
Y e
r
17,
Exhibit B
Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions
• " s •
IM
t. "' aw.n�treu /ntf%Y %a Yffkdid 'i c'�.Y{�3'< }fib
i
FORT WORTH WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
WATER
OCTOBEP,3Q92--
Wholesale Customer City of Fort Worth
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections I
Existing 603,379r 20181 803,6581
s
20091 625,2151 20281 986,0241
2 The percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing 94 %
2009 94 %
2018 96 %
2028 96 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers.
194,436 Residential
4 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
5
10
Number of residential water meters at present.
0 5/81, —
172557 3/4"
21144 V,
1711 1-1/2"
528 2"
13,949 —Non-residential
Number of non-Residential water meters at Present
7486 3/4"
3169 Ift
1154 1-1/2`
_57 US
Page 1, of 1
Yes
No
0 3"
0 4"
0 6..
0
1W
3"_
344 4"
110
to,
EM=.
Employment Projections I
Existing 603,379r 20181 803,6581
s
20091 625,2151 20281 986,0241
2 The percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing 94 %
2009 94 %
2018 96 %
2028 96 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers.
194,436 Residential
4 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
5
10
Number of residential water meters at present.
0 5/81, —
172557 3/4"
21144 V,
1711 1-1/2"
528 2"
13,949 —Non-residential
Number of non-Residential water meters at Present
7486 3/4"
3169 Ift
1154 1-1/2`
_57 US
Page 1, of 1
Yes
No
0 3"
0 4"
0 6..
0
1W
3"_
344 4"
110
to,
2 The percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing 94 %
2009 94 %
2018 96 %
2028 96 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers.
194,436 Residential
4 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
5
10
Number of residential water meters at present.
0 5/81, —
172557 3/4"
21144 V,
1711 1-1/2"
528 2"
13,949 —Non-residential
Number of non-Residential water meters at Present
7486 3/4"
3169 Ift
1154 1-1/2`
_57 US
Page 1, of 1
Yes
No
0 3"
0 4"
0 6..
0
1W
3"_
344 4"
110
to,
3 Current number of wastewater customers.
194,436 Residential
4 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
5
10
Number of residential water meters at present.
0 5/81, —
172557 3/4"
21144 V,
1711 1-1/2"
528 2"
13,949 —Non-residential
Number of non-Residential water meters at Present
7486 3/4"
3169 Ift
1154 1-1/2`
_57 US
Page 1, of 1
Yes
No
0 3"
0 4"
0 6..
0
1W
3"_
344 4"
110
to,
13,949 —Non-residential
Number of non-Residential water meters at Present
7486 3/4"
3169 Ift
1154 1-1/2`
_57 US
Page 1, of 1
Yes
No
0 3"
0 4"
0 6..
0
1W
3"_
344 4"
110
to,
Page 1, of 1
Yes
No
0 3"
0 4"
0 6..
0
1W
3"_
344 4"
110
to,
F.ORTWORTH WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
55,246
5/81,
3,611,528
4"
86,402
V
4,851,253
8"
345,024
2"
Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
55,246
5/81,
3,611,528
4"
158,499
V
4,851,253
8"
907,745
2"
0 1V
1,231,144
3"
3,611,528
4"
4,919,441
6"
4,851,253
8"
38,183,739
101,
Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater Impact fees within your
Ys
Note! fire information provided above mmNhrmmcdhmprwje, t the Land Use Assw*`ptkoa
for the 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Vees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise d>/mcted,P|euse be advised that an additional wastewater survey for a separate Master Plan
study may be required rn addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (977)66W'2l6J,
^w ,
page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
Wholesale Customer Benbrook Water Authority
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
a
Employment Projections
Existing
l 4,790
2018
6,557
rZpm
5,000
1 20281
10,435
a
Employment Projections
Existing
l 4,790
2018
6,557
1 20091
5,000
1 20281
10,435
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing 100 %
2009
100
%
2018
100
2028
100
%
3 Current number of wastewater customers
8,609 Residential
4 Will your service boundries; be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
5/8"
3/4"
V,
2"
6 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
3/4"
J.,
. . . ...........
Page 1 of 2
343 Non-residential
Yes
No
3"
4"
6"
81,
4"
6"
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
ill
8Annua Consumption per meter, gallons
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
ioll
Now Mrs Information provided above writ be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2OV9'3Q14 Fort Worth Wastewater I*o*oct Fees unless Red Oak Consulting isothei-
wise direrlerL filleaw he advised that an additional wastewater survey for a sperate Master Plan
StUdy maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey, Any comments or conterns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972) 663-2167.
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE _ ♦..... SIRTET
OCTOBER 11.
Wholesale Customer Bethesda Water Supply Corp
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey {October 2008}
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existing
27,834
201 8
_ —
34,599
_
20091
28,4461
_ .....
20281
43,010
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
4
%
2009
4
Ems �,'���
2018
4
%
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
4
%
2009
4
%
2018
4
%
2028
4
%
3 Current number of wastewater customers
197 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
9,310
5/8"
23
3/4"
51
_
i"
7
_
1 -1/2"
16
2"
6 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
518„
3j4"
1"
1 -i/2,.
Non- residential
Yes
No x
1
T Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
1,300,952,400
5/81,
21,812,400
ill
30,975,600
2"
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
558,000 4"
0 10f,
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
ioll
0nte�mis information provided above will be used m project the Land Use Assumptions
for the ZVO9-Z814 tort Worth Wastewater <nupa«zfm*m unless Red Oak Qwwsmffinghother.
wisechrected Please be advised that an additional wastewater survey for;) sperate Master Plan
stu8y,mayt/wrequired|naddidwmtmth^sm/amtmw/atefsurvey,&oycnvn,nenN*ruwnce,m»shou/d
bw directed tn Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972)OuJ-21§7,
WHOLESALE
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer Blue Mound
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Popu ation Projections
1
Existing
_.
2018
28
3,164
�•
2009
2,388
_
3,656
0
Employment Project
Existin �5$2
2018
n.s 693
2009
611
208
. _
837
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0 5f8"
0 3/4"
125 1"
___ 0 1 -1/2"
_ ._ 2
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
Non- residential
Yes
No
:r
0 5J8" 0 3.
0 3/4 " 0 4"
0
...._..
0 1-1/2" 0
__..
6 2 —0—
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
82,286
V,
2,532,000
2"
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0 101,
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater Impact fees within your
NotazThis information provided above will be used to protect the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Rod Oak Consuffing ts rdher
wise directed. Please be advised thatan additional wastewater survey for asperate Master Plan
study maybe required in addition tm this wastewater survey. Any comments o, concerns should
b* directed ,m Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972)6Jf-Z107,
Page 2of 2
207,429
V,
2,532,000
2"
0 101,
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater Impact fees within your
NotazThis information provided above will be used to protect the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Rod Oak Consuffing ts rdher
wise directed. Please be advised thatan additional wastewater survey for asperate Master Plan
study maybe required in addition tm this wastewater survey. Any comments o, concerns should
b* directed ,m Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972)6Jf-Z107,
Page 2of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
1414 01 J:I I.IP-111ily,
Wholesale Customer Burleson
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existing
32,5001
20181
47,99]7
1 20091
34,0001
20281
00
61,900
flm
Employment Projections
I Existing
i 6,5461
2018
8,774
1 20091
6,7061
20281
2,028
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
100 %
2009
100 %
2018
100 %
2028
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
11,305 —Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
10,700
5 /8 ° --
3
3/4"
29
111
6
1-1/2"
3
2"
6 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
405
5/r
0
3/4"
165
106 .1
so
... ...... .. .. .
Page I of 2
670 Non-residential
0 3"
0 4"
0 6"
0 8"-
0 10"
60 3"
2 4"
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
1,067,729,298
5/811
300,000
3/4"
2.8 MG
ill
300,000
2"
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
173,189,545
5/8"
70,558,703
ill
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Yes Ordinance C. 590
Note: This inforreation provided abovewill be used to project tfni Land Ose Assumptions
for thr, 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise di/ectwd. Please be advised that an additional wastewater survey for a sperate Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
bm directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (97I)66]%167.
Page 2of2
MORWRITHOWTIMMUMM
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Wholesale Customer Crowley
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
Existin
2018
20091 1 2028
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
S Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/8"
so I
........._.._.- --
3/4"
- -- 1"
2
1-1/2"
3
Employment Projections
Existin
2018
20091 1 2028
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
S Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/8"
4,777
........._.._.- --
3/4"
25
- -- 1"
2
1-1/2"
3
2"
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
Page I of 2
Non - residential
Yes
No X
0 3"
0 4"
0 611
0 __ 8
0 1014
10 3"
1 4"
0 .0.
0
0 1W
152
3/41
47
1.
OFF
W_ 1 -1/2"
46
2:1 i
Page I of 2
Non - residential
Yes
No X
0 3"
0 4"
0 611
0 __ 8
0 1014
10 3"
1 4"
0 .0.
0
0 1W
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
31i
342,279,082
3/4"
8,307,000
V
218,000
2"
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
2,310,000
31i
635,000
4"
11,300,000
ill
33,085,000
2"
2,310,000
31i
635,000
4"
0
101,
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Note: Fh|x information Provided above will heused tm project the Land Use Assumptions
for the Z00$'20&4 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise 6kncted,PVenseboadvinmdYua,mnadd|tiunm(waotwm/atersu*/eyfw/azpemotgm8a``ery|mn
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
hu directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Cvnso!tiwK(971)W83'216/.
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
Wholesale Customer City of Everman
I Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
:a::]
Employment Projections
Existingl
1,48�01
20181
1,661
Mori MI,
1,5591
20281
1,690
:a::]
Employment Projections
Existingl
1,48�01
20181
1,661
1 20091
1,5591
20281
1,690
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
730 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/8"
1,730
3/4"
0
1,,
0
1-1/2"
0
6 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
Page 1 of 2
142 Non-residential
Yes
No
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes, per Ft. Worth contract/agreement Ordian«c#lhd40-1V-ZVO5
Note- I his information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the Z00@'2O14 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise dirrct=J, Please be advised that uw additional wastewater survey for asperatr Master Plan
study maybe required /o addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments nr concerns should
be directed tv Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (y72) 6wJ'%16/,
Page 2 of 2
19,800,000
3/4"
100,000
Iti
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes, per Ft. Worth contract/agreement Ordian«c#lhd40-1V-ZVO5
Note- I his information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the Z00@'2O14 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise dirrct=J, Please be advised that uw additional wastewater survey for asperatr Master Plan
study maybe required /o addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments nr concerns should
be directed tv Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (y72) 6wJ'%16/,
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE •
Wholesale Customer Haltom City
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
100
' f/�
2009
ffl
'' If•
+flf1�
�
' Ifi
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
100
%
2009
100
I r •
• 111
�
______. /1 f /
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
100
%
2009
100
%
2018
100
%
2028
100
%
3 Current number of wastewater customers
Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/8"
11250
3/4"
37
1"
0
1 lj2"
_ 1
2"
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
0
5J8"
1255
3/40
335
— ....._... —
Page :I of 2
Non - residential
Yes
No X
3'
...4,
– ..._._.'66
8„
10"
75 - -- – ..._3„
14 4"
3 ._. 6"
8"
10" _
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
769139818
3/4"
ill
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes
kill
ioll
ooce�This information provided above ,viN&mused to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2D09-ZQl4 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise di,mcted.Mamsm6cmd"¢*dthata*addiUmnm|mmstovvatoromrveyfurasporaKeu8mmte,P|aw
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Arty comments or concerns should
be directed tn Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (0y2) 663-21V7.
Page 2 of 2
637665500
3/4"
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes
kill
ioll
ooce�This information provided above ,viN&mused to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2D09-ZQl4 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise di,mcted.Mamsm6cmd"¢*dthata*addiUmnm|mmstovvatoromrveyfurasporaKeu8mmte,P|aw
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Arty comments or concerns should
be directed tn Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (0y2) 663-21V7.
Page 2 of 2
V H _, * " �1- �
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Wholesale Customer City of Hurst
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on;
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
I Population Projections
I Existing
1 38,5001
20181
40,
1 20091
38,7991
20281
40,2
a
Employment Projections
Existin g
i 19,9581
20181
20,200
1 20091
20,0001
20281
20,500
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
72 %
75 %
70 %
70 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
11,153 —Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
10,966
518"
0
3/4"
116
ill
53
1-1/2"
12
2"
a
6 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
1,382 —Non-residential
Yes
No
I I I
2 _ 2.5"
S75m 5J8„ 25 3"
0 31W' is 4"
270
229 0 all
6 14r
Page 1 of 2
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
12,751,158
5/8"
0
3/4"
18,218
V
9,017
1-1/2"
5,125
2"
915 V
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
3,082,040
5/8n
0
3/4"
69,100
1.1
123,380
1-1/2"
375,237
2"
232 2.5"
57,493
3"
62,336
4"
341
6"
0
8"
0
101.
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes, City of Hurst City Code Chapter 21 Articile 11 Impact Fees
Note: This information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees Luness Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise directed. Please be advised that an additional wastewater survey for a sperate Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972) 663-2167.
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
OCTOBER 2008
Wholesale Customer City of Kennedale
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existin g
6,736
2018
9,133
.—
20091
6,9261
20281
13,412
I_
Employment Projections
Existingr�2,945
20091
3,1601
_20181
20281
_3,536
5,176
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
10 %
10 %
10 %
10 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
1,949 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
— — 58,t
_ 1,,
2 -1/2"
2"
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
204 Non - residential
No Meters
No Meters
Yes
No
-- 3"
–° 4"
6"
8..
10°
3/4" 4.,
-- V, _' 6„
Page 1 of 2
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons Individual not available
V.
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons Individual not available
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
munmn)umityY
Yes
Total sewer flow for 2007-2A0V fiscal year
Note: This Information provided above will be y�ed to project tire Land Use Assumptions
for the 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Corcrufting is other-
wise di/ncte«|,P|emsubeadvixedthatmnadd)Umnaivvawrw,vatersu,vey/m/nSpg/ate Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Arry comments or concerns should
be directed tn Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (9/1)5&3-Zi67�
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
Wholesale Customer Lake Worth
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
zmgim- a J
MEM.,
�Nmx
3/4"
139
1.
0
1-1/211
1
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
1,878 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/81l
1,993
3/4"
139
1.
0
1-1/211
1
—
2"
6 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
39 Non-residential
Yes
No
0 5/81, 5 3"
142 3/4" 4 4"
116 ill 0 6"
39 1-1/2" 0 81l
W9 21l -1 101,
Page 1 of 2
7Anmmml Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gaU*mm
5,460,000
T'
134,974,000
3/4"
9,738,000
V
0
101,
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gaU*mm
5,460,000
T'
7,537,000
4"
0
101,
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Note: This information Provided above will be used to project the Land Use A5surnptions
for the 20O9'l014 Fort Worth W^i6ewatr, Impact Fees umkss Red Oak Consulting boohwr
e|sediructed,P|*usabeudWsedthat aw additional wastewater survey fora sV./atn Master Plan
study maybe required io addition tw this wastewater survey. Any «onmnocntsw, concerns Should
be directed to Jennifer !vey, with Red Oak [onsufting(97I)663 2167.
Page 1wf 2
FORTWORTH WHOLESALE CUSTOMER
ATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
J iC 11:
Wholesale Customer City of North Richland Hills
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
Existing
28,808
1 20181
32,845
20091
29,105
1 20281
34,376
2 The percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
84%
2009
85 %
2018
88%
2028
90 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers.
18,239 Residential
4 Will your service boundaries be expanding ?
5
3
Number of residential water meters at present.
0
—_ 5/8'
17,932
3/4"
953
1"
_
10
1 -1/2"
15
2"
Number of non- Residential water meters at present
0
5/8„
626
s_ 3/4„
324
1"
Paige 1. of 2
795 Non - residential
Yes
No X
0 3"
0 4"
0 6„
0 8.1
0 10
26 T
17 4�
_, ... ..
10'
FoRT Woffm
WASTEWATER SERVICE PROJECTIONS FOR IMPACT FEE STUDY
WA
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/8"
2,027,514,132
3/4"
169,727,117
V,
1,793,794
1-1/2"
19,029,060
2-1
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
0
5/81,
35,262,149
—
3/4"
81,260,708
ill
53,480,040
1-1/2"
859,493,805
2"
15,464,109
T'
139,515,741
4"
14,310,736
6"
0
81,
0
10"
Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes
Note: Tire information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assuniptiow,
for the 2009-2014 tort Worth Wastewater IcepACt fees U01oSs Red Oak Consulting is other.
wise directed, Please be advised that an additional wastewater survey for a separate Master Platt
study may be required it) addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972) 663-2167.
page 2 of 2
MWOUT �_, 01/ . .A
Wholesale Customer City of Richland Hills
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existing
1 7,9021
20181
7,9
1 20091
7,9201
20281
7,9
Employment Projections
Existing
Existingi
7,9651
20181
8,875
8,3191
20281
9,335
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
100 %
2009
100 %
2018
100 %
2028
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/81,
2,780
—
3/4"
73
V,
. . . .............
35
. . .... .......... . ...... . ........ ...........
2,"
6 Number of non-Residential water meters at present
0
171
3/4"
16
?.T,
. . . .............
35
. . .... .......... . ...... . ........ ...........
2,"
Page 1 of 2
Non-residential
MMMMM)
0 3"
0 4"
0 61,
0 3"
1 4"
0
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
R Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
232,400,661
3/4"
11,462,098
V
24,070,900
211
R Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
1,374,200 4"
0 1V1
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes
Notc� This information providedabove will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the Z0&9'2014Fa/t Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting io other-
wise di,mn(ed.Pfem.wbeo8vioeMthatnnJddiVowalvvmatmm/wter survey for amocrat: Master Plan
study maybe reqUired in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
hw directed Lw Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972)VV3-210T
Page 2 of 2
13,126,298
3/4"
18,325,796
V,
22,398,598
2"
1,374,200 4"
0 1V1
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes
Notc� This information providedabove will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the Z0&9'2014Fa/t Worth Wastewater Impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting io other-
wise di,mn(ed.Pfem.wbeo8vioeMthatnnJddiVowalvvmatmm/wter survey for amocrat: Master Plan
study maybe reqUired in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
hw directed Lw Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (972)VV3-210T
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
Wholesale Customer City of River Oaks
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
mu=,
�NOWIM,
2018
tr
_
..
1,4691
— _.._ _..8
2028
1,527
Employment Projections
Ex 420091 t 8
'
,
2018
1,516
_
..
1,4691
— _.._ _..8
2028
1,527
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
2,611 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5 /8"
2,564
3/4"
46
ill
7
1.1/2"
0
2"
6 Number of non- Residential water meters at present
170 Non- residential
Yes
No X
0 3"
0 "— 4"
0 6"
0 u 8"
0 10
3
1 — 4—
0
0 10 °'
100
3/4"
28
1"
1A}
1�if2"
170 Non- residential
Yes
No X
0 3"
0 "— 4"
0 6"
0 u 8"
0 10
3
1 — 4—
0
0 10 °'
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gm0mms
(Calculated at 69906 per meter
0 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
179,238,984
3/4"
3,215,676
ill
(Calculated at 69906 per meter
0 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
Total Commercial Sales
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes Fee Schedule Ordinance
Yes - Section 13.02.074 "Impact Fees" River Oaks Code
Nate: rhis information Provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for tire loO9-2Dl4 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fums unless Red Oak Consulting bother.
wise directed. Please be advi.wd that ,in additional wastewater survey for a sp.rmte Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
hn directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (97Z)663-I16T
Page 2 of 2
28,041,060
3/4"
ill
Total Commercial Sales
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes Fee Schedule Ordinance
Yes - Section 13.02.074 "Impact Fees" River Oaks Code
Nate: rhis information Provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for tire loO9-2Dl4 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fums unless Red Oak Consulting bother.
wise directed. Please be advi.wd that ,in additional wastewater survey for a sp.rmte Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
hn directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (97Z)663-I16T
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
KEPT
• • ••
O • r0
Wholesale Customer City of Saginaw
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey {October 2008}
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections
Existing
19,2601
2018
23,661
_ a
20091
.-- - - - -._
19,8371
...._ ................--
20281
---
23,661
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing 100 %
2004 100 %
2018 100 %
2028 100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
6454 Residential 263 Non - residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
5jg„
6456 3/4"
1"
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
— _ $f8
87 3J4"
102 1"
11/2-
9 5 2
Page 1 of 2
Yes
No X
- - — 3,—
�6"
$„
10"
3„
5 4"
TMw.
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
W.
57748000
3"
644220000
3/4"
0
101,
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
W.
57748000
3"
9388000
4"
0
101,
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes
Nwt�-The, information p,mokw0above will bm used k*project the, Land Use Assumptions
for tire 2&89-Z014 Fort Worth Wastewater |mmart Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise direoted.P|eauebcwdvisedthotumm4dtt/ona|w,astew/atcrx/^/oyfv,o»pe,ateMautrrP[mn
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
bm directed tuiunnifw' Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (9Y2)66]'1Ih?�
WHOLESALE I -- T -- ! T -
Wholesale Customer Sansom Park
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey {October 2008}
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Employment Projections
Existingl
1,050
2018
1,120
20091
1,060
1 20281
1,200
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing
2009
2018
2028
M
ii
IM
3 Current number of wastewater customers
1,442 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
%
%
120
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0
S/8"
1,442
3/4"
0
- -- 1—
0
- 1 -1/2"
0
2"
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
0
5/8.
120
— 3/4"
_.._...__
0
1,,
0
<,
3- 1/2 12"
Page 1 of 2
Non - residential
0 3"
0 4"
0 _ 6"
0 _......_.. V
0 10"
0 4"
0 6"
7 Annual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
15,141,000
3/4"
0
ill
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Yes - Payable to Fort Worth
Note� Mis, information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees Unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise d|rnctod.P|emsebendv|oodU`mtauudditiwna|wmstwxxat,r survey for asVm/akm Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
be directed tv Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (97Z)66$'2167,
Page 2 of 2
0
ill
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
Yes - Payable to Fort Worth
Note� Mis, information provided above will be used to project the Land Use Assumptions
for the 2009-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater Impact Fees Unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise d|rnctod.P|emsebendv|oodU`mtauudditiwna|wmstwxxat,r survey for asVm/akm Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
be directed tv Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (97Z)66$'2167,
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
Wholesale Customer City of Watauga
1 Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
Population Projections I
Existing
1
1 24,157-20181
MEN MI,
25,0561
20091
24,3501
20281
25,8191
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
7876 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0 5/81,
7875 3/4"
I V,
0
0
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
0
95
3/4"
MEN MI,
V,
... . . ....... ....... .
. ..
2 The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
100 %
100 %
100 %
100 %
3 Current number of wastewater customers
7876 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0 5/81,
7875 3/4"
I V,
0
0
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
0
95
3/4"
92
V,
... . . ....... ....... .
. ..
Page 1 of 2
301 Non-residential
Yes
No
7Anaual Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
3"
655235426
3/4"
6681136
V
1293217
1-1/2"
95330551
2"
8 Annual Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
1137
3"
20585384
3/4"
26040356
ill
1293217
1-1/2"
95330551
2"
1137
3"
1267860
4"
0
Ill,
0
101,
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
N*iw:TMis information provided above will bm used tn project the Land UwAmsmnwpfiomw
for the l0Ur-IO14 Fort Worth Wastewater Impart fees unless Red Oak Consulting isother-
vasedirected, Please be advised that an additional wastewater Survey fora sperato Master Plan
study maybe required in addition to this wastewater survey. Any comments or concerns should
be directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (97l)66}2167.
Page 2 of 2
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER SURVEY
Wholesale Customer White Settlement
Population Projections for entire City Limits based on:
Wholesale Customer Survey (October 2008)
NCTCOG - Forecast Districts
Red Oak Consulting adjustment
MGM
The Percentage of your population's wastewater anticipated to be served by Fort Worth's Village
Creek Treatment Plant
Existing 90
%
2009 95
%
2018 100
%
2028 100
%
3 Current number of wastewater customers
4928 Residential
4 Will your service boundries be expanding ?
5 Number of residential water meters at present.
0
5/88" --
4795
3/4"
22
1"
10
1 -1/2"
21
2"
6 Number of non - Residential water meters at present
0
159
-° 8f4"
31
1"
25
1 -1J2-
5 7
2.e
Page 1 of 2
277 Non- residential
Yes
No X
5 1 3„
1 4"
0 6"
0 �e _8"
0 10"
7Awn#al Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
8Annwa| Non-Residential Consumption per meter, gallons
9 Are there any ordinances concerning water and wastewater impact fees within your
community?
Yes
Note: This Information provided above Will be Used topmjeCt the I-avd Use AssmmpMme
for the %O09-2014 Fort Worth Wastewater impact Fees unless Red Oak Consulting is other-
wise dirm,t,d.Mcmouhmedvi»edthatmnm&dNimoa!a/a`t*wmtrrouvvuyf*rosper*tmMastmry|an
study maybe required in addition tu this wastewater survey. Any comments mr concerns should
br directed to Jennifer Ivey, with Red Oak Consulting (97l)663'2l07.
Exhibit B
Wastewater Facilities Land Use Assumptions
+:• ;<;' ® ar sU it:t 's� ter;:; RAT `{^ {q ;p y __ n
%s+ j .IM £ A&S£i�4y P�:t A{ Ai# �iT3k F
gg7'�
1V N I
Mir-,
a
_
.�
__. n ._
�., _ - r�. – –..
ii
-`_ � —u —
Q���T
– _
�
�
{
y
�..
s
�� oi1'
>
s
s
Y
�.�.
��
,i —_ _��_. r
���
�
�
.S,
S
��
r
}.�
a ry
'
L
lY.
'
"��
e
i��
- —
v
� �
`
��
��
t
_
r
-
8_
��
ti _
,.
�, .
����,
®'aV l
..
i "�y
a
�
..
i
�
��
�
�
_
� �
�
s"
�
®
�
_
r -�
. �
r
r
��.� ti
r
�
i
I I• �I
I _ r
Imo' °,�_ , l ' �•sc :'__' !( _ u I��
L
I rip
a
��• 11 M W � f
'• 11t r l� Del � I 1..._� I I 7 u �nl� ' <
�, ,
I sl 4.n '�1 u yv<_1~• �v •�v
1
4 o �._ l x._•11 -y i ' i I =I ��,� (�,yAn(y�— IP"
All Lr
1t I�_� III !F•. '�M��h (w.- L' I � —mil
� g� �_ L 'Fi,�_ I�' ref -.•'k '��� "��`itJ, "•
C*
pi
at
`
I�
Pj- � "j'�:
1 IL•.J
LI
—9
—J
•. AI.{�
III
' I
rl
_
•
1 IL•.J
LI
—9
' I
rl
_
,
_ �I
a e•� �— — 1
1 IL•.J
LI
—9
FORTWORTH City of
Exhibit D
Capital Improvements
■
M
Water
Facilities
i't•
IITFTr. Arz,0wilM"I
F2epmt F>;T pa,H d By':
{ ( }h .
VIP''
t . .
Table of Contents
Contents
12. Capacity CrKerio- .... ..... .......... .................... --................. .................
....................... [-1
121 General ..... - ....... -----....... -......... .........................................................
[-1
122. Raw Water Sources and Tranomiaaion-- ..... .............. .................
.................. [>1
12.3. Water Treatment Plants --- -_--------....... ..................................
-...... [-3
124, Pump 8taUnno- ...... ...... ..............
[-3
125, Storage Tanks ............ ---.-------........ .......... ..---....--.....
[-5
1.3. Eligible Facilities ..... ....... ............. --........ ................. ........... ------.----.....
-5
1,4. Growth Related C|P ............. ............ --- .....................................................
......... ........... [-6
1A1 VVahaTnaatmeruP1onto-----------------------------.[-0
1.42. Pump Otodons-.------------- ........... ..............................................
[+0
1.4,3. ............. ............. -........ --.---.-....--.-.......
..[-9
List of
Figure D-1-Existing Water Facilities
FiqureD-% - PnopoaodVVaLerFud|idep
Figure D^3- Water Treatment Plant Expansion Schedule
Figure D`4- Pump Station Allocation
Figure D'5- Storage Tank Allocation
Ar Water OPProjects
G. Water PumpingCapabilities
C. C|P'"3VOS'2O18
Exhibit
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
1"1" Introduction
|o accordance with Texas Local Government Code O[LGLJ, Chapter 395, the City *f
Fort Worth has nnmoouissiuuud Red Oak Consulting, to conduct nn Impact Fee Study.
This report establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous
xhuh/ completed in 2004.
I mpact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost
associated with expanding the Municipal water system to accommodate growth in the
service area. The City of Fort Worth owns and operates an infrastructure intensive
system comprised nf treatment facilities, pumping stations, storage facilities, and
pipelines that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future
investment in the water system is known as the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The
CIP was updated u*a part of this study witb capital project scope and cost provided by
previously commissioned master planning documents and input from Fort Worth Water
Department staff.
The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth water facilities
are eligible k`h« included io the impact fee analysis. NczLthocritm,iuD/rnocnyoring
infrastructure capacity are explained for each infrastructure type, Finally, the additional
facilities required ioaccommodate growth during the o1udyperiod are summarized.
1,2, Capacity Criteria
1.2.1. General
This section o[ the study discusses the capacity of those facilities, that are eligible for
inclusion in the calculation of the impact fee. The only capacities that are considered are
the increases in capacities due to growth during the Study period of 2009 through 2019.
The following sections describe those increases in capacities for the water treatment
plants, plump stations and storage tanks that were considered for inclusion in the
calculation of the wastewater impact fee.
12.2. Raw Water Sources and Transmission
The Cii9 obtains the muiority m( its raw n'utcrsupply from the Tarrant Regional Water
Mario (TR0V[)),v,ith the hW|*oue supplied 8° the {.it}`o permitted capacity u1Lake
%k orth and the Corps of Frigineers (C'(*',) perm itted capacity at Lakc Benbnx)k� Th*
Ciry'oompph/1�nmx<}iVVDiuper 41 long term owokmwL with mm contractual limits ^wthe
water withdrawn from the Richland Chambers and ( cdmr Creek Reservoirs, subject V/the
FRWD lfinus The current water rights for the City are as fotlo"s:
��%� �mwum|wvnw,w/^e,.r�Imo
Exhibit
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
TIRWID Allot ated to Fort Worth
Lhrough a series of pump stations, the TR\YP has implemented improvements tuallow
water from the Richland Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs to flow to Lake
Bnuh,nnk. The blended water can then bt pumped back tn Rolling ] tills Water
1[»oWoent Plant (RHVV1[y) and North Holly Water Treatment Plant (N1{VVTp)/%outh
l lolly YVutor'|imotnzon1 Plant (8{{WTy}. The TRVVDisiu the process n[implementing
improvements tu tie Lake 8eob/nnk to Eagle Mountain Lake, which should hecomplete
in 2008.
The existing raw water ounn|v facilities are shown mnfollows:
Unit Capacity
Eagle Mountain Intake 66 mgd
EagleMOUntain Pump Station and Pipeline I
Lake Worth Intake and Pipeline M ing-4
Clear Fork Pump Station 90 mgd*
Cedar Creek System 138 mgd*
Richland Chambers Svstem 116 mgd*
*Indicates turn capacity with largest pump Out of service.
TheNUw,rp, SKWTP.wd tHWTYhave been iuuse forsrne time and therefore are
not associated vvi/hom expansion capacity. Aooxpwm,iomofLhe [m&iv Mountain Water
|icaImotmt Plant {FK3VVl`R) intake ]m associated with expansion capacity. t{`*c*{mciU/
associ»wdw/ith the rmvv water fitei]itiwsisnAww/ngcdbmsmdmV the water t(cm0umxt Plant
criteria. Hicrefore the same criteria are used for both raw water facilities and matcr
treatment plants, with the criteria explahied in detai I below.
"°° pu�vwmmm��r
Diversion
Normal Mild Drought
West Fork
142.374
89.207 4L035
Lake Worth (Fort Worth Pe"Rit)
10.832 t0.832
Lake Benbrook (COE Contract)
64.675
0.609 0.609
Richland Chambers Reservoir
182.874
No Limit No Lintit
Cedar Creek Reservoir
153.882
No Litnit No Lindt
Lhrough a series of pump stations, the TR\YP has implemented improvements tuallow
water from the Richland Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs to flow to Lake
Bnuh,nnk. The blended water can then bt pumped back tn Rolling ] tills Water
1[»oWoent Plant (RHVV1[y) and North Holly Water Treatment Plant (N1{VVTp)/%outh
l lolly YVutor'|imotnzon1 Plant (8{{WTy}. The TRVVDisiu the process n[implementing
improvements tu tie Lake 8eob/nnk to Eagle Mountain Lake, which should hecomplete
in 2008.
The existing raw water ounn|v facilities are shown mnfollows:
Unit Capacity
Eagle Mountain Intake 66 mgd
EagleMOUntain Pump Station and Pipeline I
Lake Worth Intake and Pipeline M ing-4
Clear Fork Pump Station 90 mgd*
Cedar Creek System 138 mgd*
Richland Chambers Svstem 116 mgd*
*Indicates turn capacity with largest pump Out of service.
TheNUw,rp, SKWTP.wd tHWTYhave been iuuse forsrne time and therefore are
not associated vvi/hom expansion capacity. Aooxpwm,iomofLhe [m&iv Mountain Water
|icaImotmt Plant {FK3VVl`R) intake ]m associated with expansion capacity. t{`*c*{mciU/
associ»wdw/ith the rmvv water fitei]itiwsisnAww/ngcdbmsmdmV the water t(cm0umxt Plant
criteria. Hicrefore the same criteria are used for both raw water facilities and matcr
treatment plants, with the criteria explahied in detai I below.
"°° pu�vwmmm��r
F; mime we
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
iW*1111"LEm- air&-711171- =1:117ram
The design criteria for water treatment plants are based on the maximum day demand.
The 2004 Water System Master Plan defined maximum day demand as 2.26 firnes the
average day demand, per historical data.
The maximum day demand computation per capita was calculated as follows:
MAX = AVG X Factor
Where MAX = Maximum day consumption per capita
AVG = Average day consumption per capita 206
Factor = Max day / Average day = 2.26
MAX — 206 X 2.26 = 465.6 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)
For the City of Fort Worth. the 2009 population given in the Land Use Assumptions
report, times the maximum day criteria of 466 gpcd provides the following design
demand for water treatment:
Max Day Demand = 466 gpcd X 722,722 population
Max Day Demand = 337 mgd
The year 2019 Max Day Demand, using the above formula would be as follows:
Max Day Demand = 466 gpcd X 947,956 population
Max Day Demand 442 mgd
The wholesale customer demand was provided by the wholesale customers as part of the
wholesale customer surveys. The 2009 Maximum Day Demand for wholesale customers
is 138 mgd and the 2019 MaximLifli Day Demand for the wholesale customers is 178
mgd.
'the total 2009 V-axil-nUal Day Demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is
475 mgd (337 + 138 mgd). The total 2019 Maximum Day Demand for Fort Worth and
its wholesale customers is 6220 mad (442 ( 178 mad).
The incremental demand rehired to treatment capacity during the study period is therefore
145 mad (621) mgd — 475 mgd). This is greater than H mgd increase in demand per year
over the SILKIV [70-iod,
1.2.4. Pump Stations
The Texas Commission on Environmental Ouafity (TCFQ) requires pump station
capacity to be a minimum of 0.6 gallons per minute igpin) per connection, provided the
I.WpiAi V1.0111Yen*�Is an
VMeT tart .t +..5
... .... ...
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
City's system has an elevated storage capacity exceeding 200 gallons per connection
{which it does }.
Pump Capacity = 0.6 gpm/connection X Number of Connections X 24 Itrs /day
X 60 min /hr
0.6 gpm X 355,205 connections X 24 firs /day X 60 min/hr
307 mgd
The pumping capacity requirement is actually higher than this, due to the reputnping
characteristics of the City's system. Also, the state requirements are a minirnmn value,
with the City's own system requirements for pressure dictating the correct pumping
capacity. The City's formula calculates the pumping capacity required based on the
greater of the peak hour flow or the maximum day flow plus fire flow. The 2009
pumping capacity that would be required would be as follows:
Pump Capacity Max Day X Pcak Hour Factor
475 mgd X 1.57
746 mgd
Where:
Max Day = System Maximum Day Flow (from previous section)
Peak Hour Factor = Peak Hour /Max Day Factor from Master Plan
dr. based on max day phis fire flow:
Pump Capacity
Where:
= Max Day [-Fire Flow
Fire flow for the City is based on 4,000 gpm per pressure plane:
Fire Flow = 4,000 gpm X 60 mimites/hour X 24 hour /day X 13 pressure planes
75 mgd
Purnp Capacity = 475 mgd + 75 mgd
55o mgd
The Pump Capacity calculation which provides the maximum required capacity is the one
that uses the peak hour factor, resulting in a required prnuping capacity for 2009 of 738
mgd. This calculation is used to determine the required pumping capacity for 1019.
Pump Capacity 621) mgd X 1.57
973 mgd
RSMK
V C
Wo, t at �{s s rtitocs rIN•o v T�xl £d °e 4
» an�xeeii �r rxs�.w nana ..
Exhibit
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
The calculated incremental pumping capacity demand iwtherefore 227ou,6<9?]m,d-
746 mgd) for the required level of service for the study period of 2009 to 2019.
The TC8[} criteria for water system design states that 2n0 gallons per connection vftotal
storage and l00 gallons per connection "f elevated storage inrequired. The City uses
these criteria to determine the required storage capacity to serve its retail customers as
most nf its wholesale customers have their own storage capacity. The calculation *fthe
storage requirement i^uofollows:
2004 Total 200 Gu|/cvunrotion x2l5,o63 connections =43.2h&G
Elevated 100gaUconnectionx2l5,963connectiotis=21.6MG
2019 Total = 20A gel/connection x283,/73 connections= 5h.6K8(j
Elevated = 100 go]/conticction x283,173 connections � 28.3 MG
The TCEQ requirements are a minimum, with the City adopting a different formula to
determine their storage requirements, The City has a total storage capacity presently of
|2V3K1G(75.7MJ|io the distribution system and 45MGutthe water treatment plants)
and lh.5b8(}uf elevated storage. The City uses more stringent design criteria. from the
20U4 Water System Master Plan, with the calculation uufollows:
7l4ui Storage = Population X(| cnoncutioo/] persons) X
(City Only) (400 gal/connettion)
The calculation of the required total storage was made net of wholesale storage
requirements, because some wholesale customers have their own storage. Yherelbre, the
consumption for the City customers was used tu determine the total storage requirements.
20091otai Storage = 722,722 X(l/3)X48A gal =V64MG
20191hta| Storage = 947,956X(1 B)X40O gal =i264K�G
Thus, the need (br total storage during the Study period ix equal k`v6'4&d6ioI8U9and
|264K8GimI0i9./ul incremental demand of20.081G was calculated (|26AMG^
96A MG)
1^1 Eligible Facilities
1limycoio»nsk`b\iiousthe types y[C^vf Fort \V.xthnmUmruciUties that are eligible
for inclusion iu the calculation ufthuim,pmct IeC�!omj*^, inC|udcd io the ('\11 can serve
iu rehabilitate and ,o,tt«w the system. enhance the system \o improve ml\lmiuucy kind meet
regulatory rcquir-Iments, increase the system capacity, or achieve a combination of these
obiectives. Only those projects warranted by capacity issues derived from growth
occurring during the Itjdv period 0009 to 210 19) car. Iv included in the impact fcc
"~^
RMAKn wmavmom,m��r
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
calculation. Additionally, projects are excluded front the impact fee calculation if the
costs cannot be accurately delineated of if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in
place,
Raw Water is obtained from the Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD) and with costs
to the City of Fort Worth the tied to usage, which is effectively captured in User rates.
Financing costs associated with the water system have been excluded due to the dynamic
nature of the financial markets, and the uncertainty this introduces, consistent with
previous City of Fort Worth impact fee studies.
Drinking water transmission mains and distribution piping have been excluded from this
Study due to alternate cost recovery mechanisms in place, consistent with the previous
impact fee study.
Facilities included in the impact fee study are raw water supply and transmission, water
treatment facilities, pump stations, storage facilities, reclaimed water facilities, and
engineering studies.
Figures D- I and D-2, showing existing and proposed facilities, respectively, are included
at the end of this section.
Appendix A describes each Water CIP project for the 2009-2019 planning period. The
purpose of each project, the portion that is allocated to growth and the current status is
also included.
1.4. Growth Related CIP
1.4.1. Water Treatment Plants
The existing water treatment capacity is 485 mgd. Section 1.23 calculations: presented a
maximum day demand in 2009 of 475 mgd, increasing- to 620 mgd by 2019. 'I his results
in an incremental demand of 145 mgd. The current capacity of the treatment plants is
greater than the 475 mgd required in 2009. Thus. 10 mgd (485 mgd — 475 mgd) of the
incremental demand has already been satisfied. Figure D-3 presents the water treatment
demand, as well is the treatment capacity and requirements during the study period. The
004 Water System Masker Plan presents alaXiMURI day demands for the years 2002 to
1025 l'hc aiiooatiori of capital costs during the study period was made as li?llcrtas;
I - The recent expansion ofthe Cagle Niounutin W IT from 71) rn,od to 105 ne-M
provides eapacity in excess of the 2009 maximum day demand. Fire excess
capacity will be used to serve future castorrivrs. "The current capacity of all of the
water treatment plant is 485 nigd, and the 2009 maximum day demand is 475
•"aptal !-,C-Mmmeck, Man
C)
IV
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
mgd. Thus, 10 mgd (485 mgd - 475 mgd) of the 35 mgd expansion of l,MW'I'P
will be used to serve future customers.
Growth - related allocation 10 mgd135 mgd = 29%.
Study period allocation = (35 mgd - 25 mgd) -- 10 mgd<145 mgd.
Remaining incremental demand = 145 mgd - 10 mgd = 135 mgd.
% Allocated for Study Period = 100% X 29% = 29%.
2. The South Holly WTP Pump Station Improvements and Expansion Project (180
mgd to 200 mgd) will be required during the study period. Approximately 10%
of this project is considered to be growth-related because the pump station will be
upsized from 180 mgd to 200 mgd as part of the improvements project. The
expansion of SHWTP will begin in 2009. The Sl IWTP expansion should be
allocated against the remaining system-wide additional capacity requirement of
135 mgd.
Growth-related allocation = (200 mgd - 180 mgd) / 200 mgd = 10%
Study period allocation =(200 mgd 180 mgd) = 20 mgd < 135 mgd
Remaining incremental demand- 135 mgd-20 mgd= 115 mgd
% Allocated for Study Period= 100% X 10 % = 10%
The Westside WTP will be needed during the Study period by 2011. This project
will increase the plant capacity by 15 mgd. The WSWTP should be allocated
against the remaining system -w=ide additional capacity requirement of 115 mgd.
Study period allocation = ( 1 5 mgd - 0 mgd) = 1 5 rngd < H 5 mgd
Remaining incremental demand = 115 mgd 15 mgd - 100 mgd
% Allocated for Study Period = 100%
4. The RIIWTP Phase IV expansion from 200 mgd to 250 mgd will be needed
during the study period, The R1 IWTP Phase IV expansion should be allocated
against the remaining system-wide additional capacity requirement of 100 mgd.
Study period allocation - (250 mgd - 200 mgd) = 50 mgd < 100 mgd
Remaining incremental demand = 100 mgd - 50 mgd - 50 mgd
% Allocated for Studv Period 100%)
Additional WSIN"I'll Membrane I titers (IS niad to 20 ingd) ivill lie needed during
the study period, The membrane filters should be allocated against the systern-
wide addivionat capacity requirement of 50 trgd.
Study period allocation -- (20 mgd - 15 mgd) - = 5 mgd < 50 mgd
Remaining incremental tictuand 50 mgd i in d 45 mvtd
% Allocated for Study Period % 100
PEIM)(,
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
6. FMWTP Expansion from 105 mgd to 140 mgd will be needed during the study
period to meet the required maximum day demand. The expansion should be
allocated against the system -wide additional capacity requirement of 45 mgd.
Study period allocation =z (140 mgd — 105 mgd) . 35 mgd < 45 mgd
Remaining incremental demand = 45 mgd -- 35 mgd = 10 mgd
% Allocated for Study Period = 100%
Additional WSWTP Membrane Filters (20 mgd to 25 mgd) will be needed during
the study period. The membrane filters should be allocated against the system-
wide additional capacity requirement of 10 mgd.
Study period allocation — (25 mgd -20 mgd) = 5 mgd < 10 mgd
Remaining incremental demand — 10 mgd — 5 mgd - 5 mgd
% Allocated for Study Period =100%
8. Additional WSWTP Membrane Filters (25 mgd to 30 mgd) will be needed during
the study period. The membrane filters should be allocated against the system-
wide additional capacity requirement of mgd.
Study period allocation = (30 mgd -- 25 mgd) = 5 mgd = 5 mgd
Remaining incremental demand = 5 mgd 5 mgd = 0 mgd
% Allocated for Study Period = 5 mgd 15 mgd = 100%
1.4.2. Pump Stations
While it is more accurate to calculate Pump station requirements and demand on a
pressure zone basis, the Land Use Assumptions were done for the system as a whole,
with not enough data to determine pressure zone requirements. System wide calculation
tends to provide a conservative demand, in that much of the water is repumped between
pressure zones. The system-wide demand was used for this Study.
In section 1.2.4, the demand for pump station capacity increased from 746 mod in 2009
to 973 mgd in 2019. This incremental demand of 227 mgd is required to serve growth.
'Therefore, the calculation of the study period capacity percentage is as follows:
Study Period 'Total NewPuntnina Required
Capacity of'Proposed pumping Prqjccts
Allocation to Study Period = q2 to d
45 mgd
_� 1041%
'the remainder of the required pitrup station capacity is met from existing capacity.
Figure DA prcsents agraphical interpretation of the proJecis included and those
attributed 1,0 future growth.
Fud *,nth Vft? cr
(XNSLXnW Capia Man "'s
W
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
1.4.3. Storage Tanks
The city currently has 120.7 MG of total storage. The total incremental capacity
required during the study period is 30 MGM (126.4 MG 96A MG), which was calculated
in Section l.2.5. fhere is a total of 33 MG in storage capacity identified in the CIP. For
the purpose of allocating the costs of additional storage between study period customers,
and customers beyond the study period, the following calculations were made:
Study Period = Total New Storage Required
Capacity of Proposed Storage Projects
% Allocation to Study Period = 30 Mc
33 MG > 90.9%
The remaining 9.1% of the pump station costs are allocated to the period beyond the
study period. Figure D-5 presents a graphical interpretation of the amount of projects
included and those attributed to future growth.
1.4.4. Engineering Studies
Their are four studies which have been included in the calculation of the water impact
fees. The studies are as follows:
1. 1998 Water Facilities Plan --The Water Facilities Plan updated the water
treatment plant aspects of the 1989 Master Plan for the period of 1998 through
2018. The Water Facilities Plan also made recommendations concerning
reliability and regulatory improvements. Eleven years of the twenty year study
was for existing customers, and nine years of the twenty year study was for the
study period. The calculation of the allocation was as follows:
Existing Customers 11/20 = 55%
Study Period = 9/20 45%
Beyond Study Period = 0/20 = 0%
% Allocation for Study Period = 45%
1 2004 Water System Master Plan —The 1989 Water System Master Plan was
updated, including a comprehensive projection ofthe facilities required frorn, the
-,ear 2004 through 2!}23. Fins plan will be updated again in 2014, 'Fhcreforc, five
nears of the ten -year Hfc of the plan is fin- existing customers. and the remainirwo
five years are for the study period
Existing Custorucrs 5110 50%
Study Period 5110 50%
Beyond Study Period Olin 0%
% Allocation for Study Period 50%
'U'VOr F acAvp,
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
3. 2014 Water System Master Plan -The 2004 Water System Master Plan will be
updated, including a comprehensive projection of the facilities required from the
year 2014 through 2033. This plan will be updated again in 2024. Therefore, five
years of the ten-year life of the plan is for the study period, and the remaining five
years are for the period beyond the study period.
Existing CUSIRoners — 0/10 0%
Study Period — 5110 50%
Beyond Study Period — 5110 = 50%
% Allocation for Study Period = 50%
4. 2004 Impact Fee Study -The 2004 Impact Fee Study provides impact fees for
the study period 2004 through 2014. Therefore, five years of the ten-year study
period for the existing customers, and the remaining five years are for the study
period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the other halt'
is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Existing Customers 5110 = 50%
Study Period 5/t0 = 50%
Beyond Stud) Period 0/10 = 0%
'Yo Allocation for Study Period = 50%
5. 2009 impact Fee study —The 2009 Impact Fee Study provided impact fees for
the study period 2009 through 2019. Therefore, 100% of the Study is allocated to
the study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the
other half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Existing Customers
A 0/10 0%
Study Period — 10/10 100%
Beyond Study Period — 0/10 0%
% Allocation for Study Period =100%
G. 2012 Impact Fee Study Although the requirement is to conduct an impact fee
study every live years, the City would like to update the Study every three years.
'I he 2012 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees For the study period 2012
through 2022. Therefore, seven years of the ten.-year study period are allocated to
the study v period, and the remaining three years are for the period beyond the
study period. One half to the study is rar the water impact fee updated and the
other half is for the wastewater impact fee ufrdate.
F.'xisling Customers 0/10 0%
Study Period 7110 70%
Beyond Study Period 3/10 30%
% Allocation for Study Period 70%
RJaMK rmwow i
00114SI1♦tiW1 xi9.?zti to
Wafei J
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
7. 2015 Impact Fee Study The 2015 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees
for the study period 2015 through 2025. Therefore, four years of the ten-year
study period are allocated to the study period, and the remaining six years are for
the period beyond the study period. One half of the Study is for the water impact
fee update and the other half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Existing Customers = 01I() = 0%
Study Period 4110 = 40%
Beyond Study Period = 61t0 = 60%
% Allocation for Study Period =X10%
8. 2018 Impact Fee Study -The 2018 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees
for the study period 2018 through 2028. Therefore, one year of the ten-year Study
period are allocated to the study period, and the remaining nine years are for the
period beyond the study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee
update and the other half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Existing Customers 0/10 0%
Study Period 1/10 10%
Beyond Study Period 9110 = 90%
% Allocation for Study Period = 10%
Table IM summarizes the growth related costs of the eligible facilities. Appendix C
shows the detail development of the costs and capacities of the eligible facilities.
sir REIMK F(W wo
:...................7
7-1
L J
7-1
ei� II;
C
u fr- aa11°.S �1 f
�L IYY
IIA I V'Sf_JiiK¢ I 11
r`.
e
°nti _ -, •_rim :- I'.�...
z
tr
I I- ��.� —___., .. I a �[ 1L 1•
TL
II 1 It III l� IJ� l -�
�u
* v
r."�i" I � i � I•
�I
Y+
NCI
_ . =T "A
}•1 J 1� ?'fir lY _ �_,�Yy41� � k-r `� a.�J 'ra
Zakit •.
}l
Ir
V
i 1..Rfrll 11 j
L 1
n�
�Y
J
�
Y��i�rr -r
Zakit •.
}l
JJ-
I
I
I
i
it
-.r - -
-Jr
.... ......
N I
I I -! I
Aa
-.r - -
-Jr
.... ......
N I
I I -! I
17
71,1
i - r
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
F i F •
�(''''yy'' y`'q'''[
k.:i\. k.i 1. } °$1
t * ^ ". �en!sv� rriYwuSa+ewt
Vvx
mr F U Etas
Appendix /\
WATER CIP PROJECTS
FEVINMIT
Project Title: Raw Water Pipeline tuVKestsido Water Treatment Plant (VV3^34)
Description: Design and construction of a raw water line to the proposed Westside Water
Treatment Plant,
Purpose: A new water treatment plant is recommended to meet the demands inthe
northwest part uf the City. This project was recommended by the 2O04Water
Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period as it is required to
treat the projected demand of 616 mgd in 2019.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Clear Fork Raw Water Pump Station Parallel Pipeline to Holly WTP
Description: Design and construction ofan additional raw water pipeline from the Clear Fork
Trinity River Pump Station to the Holly WTP.
Purpose: Provide an additional raw water line to provide additional raw water supplies.
Allocation: This project is allocated 1V0%k) growth |n the study period, nmk$ required 0n
bring an additional 50 mgd of raw water to the Holly WTP.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water Pump Station from 35mgd$nTmmmgd(140
xmgd total capacity)
Description: Design and construction uf additional pumping capacity !o the Second Eagle
Mountain Raw Water PUMP Station.
Purpose: Provide additional raw watersupplies to the Eagle Mountain Water Trratfrlefrt
Plant to a capacity of 140 mgd.
Allocation: This project ho allocated l0w%to growth awitb required tv bring the total
treatment capacity of the Eagle Mountain VVTPtu140n`gd. However, only an
additional 26 mgd is needed during the study period so 743% is allocated to the
study period and the remaining 25.7% is allocated to the period beyond the
study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Southwest Water Treatment Plant Raw Water Line
Description: Design and construction of a new raw water line to the proposed Southwest
WTP.
Purpose: A new water treatment plant is recommended to meet the demands in the
southwest part of the City. This project was recommended by the 2004 Water
Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth as it is required to bring the treatment
capacity up to the projected demand in 2020. However, this additional raw
water capacity is not required during the study period so 0% is allocated to the
study period and 100% is allocated to the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water Pump Station from 70 mgd to 140 mgd
(210 mgd total capacity)
Description: Design and construction of additional pumping capacity in the Second Eagle
Mountain Raw Water Pump Station.
Purpose: Provide additional raw water supplies to the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment
Plant to a capacity of 210 mgd.
Allocation: This project was allocated 100% to growth , as it is required to bring the total
treatment capacity of the Eagle Mountain WTP to 210 mgd. However, this
additional raw water capacity is not required during the study period so 0% is
allocated to the study period and 100% is allocated to the period beyond the
study period.
Status: Planning Stage
WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Project Title: Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 70 mgd to 105 mgd — High Service Pump Station
(N2 -5A)
Description: Adckional high service primp station capacity as part of the Eagle Mountain
WTP Expansion to 105 mgd.
Purpose: Provide additional pumping capacity at Eagle Mountain WTP. This project was
recommended by the 2004 Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, approximately 25 mgd of
the 35 mgd expansion is allocated to existing customers (71.4 %). The remaining
capacity will be used by future customers during the study period so 28.6% is
allocated to growth in the study period.
Status: Constructed
Project Title: Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 70 mgd to 105 mgd (N2 -6A)
Description: Design and construction of the Eagle Mountain WTP expansions from 70 mgd to
105 mgd.
Purpose: Additional treatment capacity is required to meet the rapid growth and
increased demand in the northwest part of the city. This project was
recommended by the 2004 Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, approximately 20 mgd of
the 35 mgd expansion is allocated to existing customers (57.1 %). The remaining
capacity will be used by future customers during the study period so 42.9% is
allocated to growth in the study period.
Status: Constructed
Project Title: Rolling Hills Water Treatment Plant Expansion to 200 mgd, Phase V Chem —40 mgd
(EXP -8)
Description: Design and construction of Rolling Hills Water Treatment Plant expansion to
treat 200 mgd.
Purpose: Rolling Hills WTP was constructed in 1973 in two 40 mgd units and was doubled
to 160 mgd in 1983. It is recommended that the Rolling Hills WTP be increased
further to 200 mgd because of the rapid growth of the City's south and east
sides and projected water demand increase, This project was recommended in
the 1998 . Water facilities Plan. This project has been divided into 5 separate
Phases
Phase I includes the addition of the ozonation to the treatment process. This
improvement is not associated with growth and is allocated at 05'.
Phase Ii incfudes improvements of the elevated tank and associated pumps to
backwash the filters. This improvement is not associated with growth and is
allocated at 0 %.
Phase III includes improvements tn the filters, sedimentation basins and
flocculation basins. These improvements are associated with the 4Orngd
increase in treatment capadty.
Phase IV includes improvements to the high service pump stations at the plant.
These improvements are associated with the 40 mgd increase in treatment
capacity.
Phase V includes improvements tn the chemical feed systems. This
improvement b not associated with growth and is allocated atO%.
Allocation: This project was allocated 100 to existing capacity, asit will not increase the
capacity available to future customers.
Status: Phases I-IV Complete. Phase V planning stage
Project Title: Eagle Mountain UVTP3.3A8G C;earmeU
Description: Additional treated water dpaowp|| storage at Eagle Mountain VVTP.
Purpose: Provide additional treated water storage for peak flow demand pumping
/Akunhon: This project b allocated lO0%tn existing capacity aa|t will not increase the
capacity available to future customers.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: South Holly Pump Station Improvements &Expansion
Description: The existing South Holly high service water pump station will berehabilitated
and expanded.
Purpose� The pump station capacity will beexpanded to provide additional pumping
capacity provided in the WTP expansion from 180 mgd to 200 mgd.
Allocation: The additional 20 mgd treatment plant capacity expansion increases the total
plant capacity byll.l% to meet future water system demands. This project is
allocated 10% to growth in the study period and 90% for rehabilitation (serving
existing customers) because 20 mgd of the 200 mgd project will be available to
serve future customers.
Status. Planning Stage
Project Title: Holly WTP — Ozone and Expansion
Description: The existing South Holly VVTP primary disinfection system will he chanDrdf,nrn
chloramines to ozone ind the treatment pfant capacity will be expanded,
Purpose: The VVTP treatment capacity will bm expanded from lO0nngdto2O0mgd.
Allocation: The additional Z0mgd treatment plant capacity expansion increases the total
plant capacity by 11.1% to meet future water system demands. This project is
allocated 10% to growth in the study period and 90% for rehabilitation (serving
existing customers) because ZOmgdof the 20Omgd project will be available t*
serve future customers.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Westside Water Treatment Plant (N3^8S)
Description: Design and construction of a new membrane Westside Water Treatment Plant.
Purpose: A new water treatment plant b recommended to meet the demands inthe
northwest part of the City. This project was recommended by the 2004 Water
Master Plan.
Allocation: The treatment plant will be expanded in stages by the installation of additional
membrane filter cartridges.
Phase |^0-15/ngd-3Filters
Phase ||,l5'2OrnXd-4Filters
Phase {||,Z0'Z5no0d-5Filters
Phase IV, %5'j0nogd-5Filters
This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period, as it is required to
treat the projected demand of62U,ngdinZ0l9.
Status: Planning Stage Phase |
Project Title: Rolling Hills WTP Expansion from 200 mgd to 250 mgd (S2-7)
Description: Design and construction of Rolling Hills Water Treatment Plant expansion to
treat Z5Umgd.
Purpose: |tis recommended that the Rolling Hills VVTybe increased further to2S0mgd
because mf the rapid growth of the City's south and east sides and projected
water demand increase. This project was recommended in the 2004 Water
Master Nan
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to gfowth m the utudy penrod, as ft is required to
provide capacity tw meet projected water dwrnands in 2016,
Status� Planning
Project Title: Eagle Mountain VVTP Expansion from 185mggd$o%4Vmogd;Expand High Service Pump
Station (N2-18A)
Description: Design and construction of Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant expansion to
treat 140mgd.
Purpose: It$ recommended that the Eagle Mountain VVTPbe increased further to14O
mgd because of the growth of the City's north side and Alliance Airport area,
and projected water demand increase. This project was recommended in the
Z0V4 Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period, as it is required to
provide capacity to meet projected water demands in 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Southwest YVTP Phase 1(D~15 mgd)
Description: Design and construction ofa Southwest Water Treatment Plant.
Purpose: A new water treatment plant h recommended tu meet the demands iothe
southwest part of the City. This project was recommended by the 2004 Water
Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated lU8% to growth, usitis required to meet the projected
water demand in20ZO. However this additional capacity is not required during
the study period so 0% is allocated to the study period and 100% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 140 mgd to 210 mgd, Expand High Service Pump
Statiom(W2^2dA)
Description: Design and construction of Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant expansion to
treat 21QrnKd.
P^rpomw: |tim recommended that tbm Eagle H8mmntw|nw [Fbe increased further Us21n
rwgydb*mauaenf the fi/mwk#nf the [|r/s north side and Alliance Airport area,
moWp.«�e«�wdwmtf�de/�an�inc,�mywthis |*o)wct was recommended |*dhm
2004 Water Maste� Plan.
Allocation: 'This project is allocated IGO% to growth, as it is required to provide capacity to
meet projected water demands in2011 However this additional capacity iynot
required during the study period su01Y,b allocated to the study period and
I(RYX is allocated to the period beyord the �WCIV uffr0d.
Status: Planning
PUMP STATION
Project Title: Eastside Pump Station Improvements (E2`1)
Description: Design and construction of»replacement Eogside Pump Station with nn
expanded capacity from 35 to 50 mgd.
Purpose: A replacement pump station b necessary tu provide additional pumping
capacity to the northeastern areas and redeveloping areas.
Allocation: The additional 15/ngd pump station capacity increases the total pump station
capacity by4Z.9%to meet future water system demands. This project is
allocated 30% to growth in the study period and 70% for rehabilitation (serving
existing customers) because l5rnKdof the 50nnAd project will be available to
serve future customers.
Status: Design
Project Title: HVmstddeV Pump Station with 3m^0d Capacity (V0S'1)
Oesoipduo: Design and construction ofa new VVostsideV Pump Station with a capacity of]
mQn.
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population
growth in this pressure plane. This project was recommended in the 7004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project was allocated 100% to growth in the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: SSNPwmp Station at Sun County Tank (W4-5)
Description: Design ind construction of a new Southside IV Pump Station witha capacity of 3
mg4,
Purpo»*� A new pump station is necessary nz address the projected new population
growth |m this pressure plane, This project was recommended im the %004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project was allocated 100% to growth in the study period,
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Southside III P.S. on Retta Mansfield Rd (S3-7)
Description: Design and construction of a new Southside III Pump Station with a capacity of 5
mgd,
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population
growth in this pressure plane. This project was recommended in the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Westside IV Pump Station on Interstate 20 (W4-3)
Description: Design and construction of a new Westside IV Pump Station with a capacity of 4
mgd.
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population
growth in this pressure plane. This project was recommended in the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: Westside III Pump Station (W3-12)
Description: Design and construction of a new Westside III Pump Station with a capacity of
15 mgd.
Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population
growth in this pressure plane. This project was recommended in the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: -rpis project is allocated 100% to growth in the study, period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2.UMG Elevated Storage Tank au Cooks Lane (E2^3)
Description: Design and construction nfnZ.ON1G elevated storage tank for the Eastdde|f
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: N order tn meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Eastside 11 Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 3OMG of the
additional 3]k8Gnf storage capacity in the water QPis required during the
study period so 90�9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 3MGGround Storage Tank mn|e-20 (W3-4)
Description: Design and construction nfa3M6 ground storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed. This
improvement was recommended hy the Z004 Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project b allocated 100%to growth. However, only 3U MIS nfthe
additional 33M$of storage capacity in the water C|Pis required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 1.*M6 Elevated Storage Tank on Peden Road (N4-2)
Descdptiow Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Northside IV
Pressure Plane.
Pwv,osm� In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the Projected Population, additional storage fadhbe�are needed in the
Northside IV Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the W04
Water Master Plan.
/AkooaVun: This project b allocated 10ON.tv growth. However, only 30M6ufthe
additional 43 MG of storage cipacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: SA MG WSIV Elevated Storage Tank (W4 -6)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside IV
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Westside IV Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 1 MG SS III elevated tank west of Crowley (S3 -2)
Description: Design and construction of a 1 MG elevated storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed. This
improvement was recommended by the 2004 Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 909% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2.5 MG SS in ground tank at proposed 24 " water line on ReMi Mansfield Rd. (52 -9)
Description; Design and construction of a 2.5 MG ground storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
SS III pressure plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2404 Water
Master Pian.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2.5 MG WS III elevated tank (W3 -7)
Description: Design and construction of a 2.5 MG elevated storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
WS III pressure plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004 Water
Master Plan,
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank North of Aledo Road (WS -3)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside V
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Westside V Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2.5 MG Southside III Ground Storage Tank and Land (S2 -8)
Description: Design and construction of a 2.5 MG ground storage tank for the Southside [if
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Southside III Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 0.5 MG WS V elevated tank (W5 -4)
Description: Design and construction of a 0.5 MG elevated storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
WS V pressure plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004 Water
Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2.5 MG WSIII Elevated Storage Tank (W3 -9)
Description: Design and construction of a 2.5 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside III
Pressure Plane,
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirerents and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Wes side III Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 1.5 MG WSIII Elevated Storage Tank (W3 -7)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.5 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside III
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Westside III Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: WSIVJSSIV Elevated Storage Tank (W4-5)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.5 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside IV
Pressure Plane.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Westside IV Pressure Plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title; 5 MG ground storage tank at the Caylor Tank Site (192.10)
Description: Design and construction of a 5 MG ground storage tank..
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed. This
improvement was recommended by the 2004 Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2 MG elevated tank at Western Center Blvd and Lou Menk Dr. (E2 -9)
Description: Design and construction of a 2 MG elevated storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed. This
improvement was recommended by the 2004 Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 1.5 MG WS IV Elevated Storage Tank (W4 -10)
Description: Design and construction of a 1.5 MG elevated storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
WS IV pressure plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004 Water
Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100 °%to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9 °.% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 1 MG SS II Elevated Storage Tank (52 -10)
De,,(r?ption` Design and construction of a 1 N#G elevated storage tank,
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
SS 11 pressure plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004 Water
Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 1 MG SS III Elevated Storage Tank (S3 -12)
Description: Design and construction of a 1 MG elevated storage tank.
Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand to
due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the
Southside III pressure plane. This improvement was recommended by the 2004
Water Master Plan.
Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth. However, only 30 MG of the
additional 33 MG of storage capacity in the water CIP is required during the
study period so 90.9% is allocated to the study period and 9.1% is allocated to
the period beyond the study period.
Status: Planning Stage
ENGINEERING STUDIES
Project Title: 1998 Water Facilities Plan
Description: An engineering study to assess and update water treatment plant needs
Purpose: The water facilities plan updates the water treatment plant requirements for
the 20 -year period from 1998 to 2018. Reliability and regulatory improvements
were also recommended as part of this study.
Allocation: 45% of the cost for the 1998 Water Facilities Plan is allocated to the study
period because nine of the twenty years are within the study period.
Status: Complete
Project Title: 2004 Water Master Plan
Description: An engineering study to update the 1994 Water Master Plan.
Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20-year
period from l004k>Z824, The water master plan guides the capital
improvements program to ensure cost effective expansion of the system.
Allocation: 50% of the cost for the 2004 Water Master Plan is allocated to the study period
because five of the ten years of the plan's useful life (because itioupdated
every ten years) are within the study period.
Status: Complete
Project Title: 20%4 Water Master Plan
Description: An engineering study to update the 2004 Water Master Plan.
Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20-year
period from Z014to2OI4. The water master plan guides the capital
improvements program toensure cost effective expansion of the system.
Allocation: 5O%uf the cost for the Z814 Water Master Plan b allocated to the study period
because five nf the ten years of the plan's useful life (because i1isupdated
every ten years) are within the study period.
Status: Planning
Project Title: 2004 Impact Fee Study (%(04-2024)
0rooin1|on: 4n engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: Uy statute the impact fee report and ordinance must he updated every five
years.
AUuonUnn: J0%of the cost for 24B# impact fee study can be allocated bothe study period
because five (if the ten years are within the study period TMei*`pa«tfwmnvvvo
water and vvm^cexvwter.w/ith50%^l|ocmtmd to each
States: Complete
Project Title: 2009 Impact Fee Study (2009-2019)
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: Dy statute the impact fee report and ordinance must bw updated every five
years
Allocation: 18O%of the cost for the 2Oo9 impact fee study can be allocated tn the study
period. The impact fee covers water and wastewater, with 50% allocated to
each.
Status: In Progress
Project Title: 2013 Impact Fee Study (2012-2022)
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 70%oJ the cost for the 2Dl2 impact fee study can h* allocated to the study
period because seven of the ten years are within the study period. The impact
fee covers water and wastewater, with 50% allocated to each.
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2015 impact Fee Study (2015-2nZG)
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can beassessed.
Purpose� By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 4V%nf the cost for the 1Uli impact fee study can be allocated todhestudy
period because four nf the ten years are within the Study period, The impact
fee covers water and wastewater, with 50% allocated to rmrh
Status: Planning Stage
Project Title: 2018 Impact Fee Study (2018 -2028)
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 10% of the cost for the 2018 impact fee study can be allocated to the study
period because one of the ten years is within the study period. The impact fee
covers water and wastewater, with 50% allocated to each.
Status: Planning Stage
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
..•- ;wnm.+ereun� +eer.a t�`�t ar F�sr =,iµs ...............__..
am
r-ITUMPF."
Water Pumping Capabiliti
RED
I I , y I I I � , _ � " H v I 1 u:, W
RAW WATER SUPPLY PUMP STATIONS
Clear Fork Raw Water Pump Station 4 pumps
.... . ..... ... ..... - -------
Eagle Mountain WTP Raw Water Pump Station 1 70 mgd 4 pumps
Eagle Mountain WTP Raw Water Pump Station 2 70 mgd 2 pumps
WATER TREATMENT HIGH SERVICE PUMP STATIONS
Mountain WTP HSPS 11
TOANTRIUMVOIJ-21910MO
Hills WTP 1 HSPS 10
North Holly WTP HSPS 95 mgd 8 pumps
.......... ..... . .... . ...... .... .
South Holly WTP HSPS 90 mgd 5 pumps
...... ..................... ...... ... . .. . . ......... .. ....
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PUMP STATIONS
......
. .... .. ..
........... .... ......
Alta Mesa Pump Station
35
mgd
5
pumps
Southside [it
Caylor Pump Pump Station
5
mgd
3
pumps
Cantrell-Saw;om Pump Station
5
mgd
3
pumps
Northside 11
Chapel Creek Pump Station
I
mgd
3
pumps
Westside IV
Como Purrip Station
40
mgd
4
pumps
Westside It
Fast Side Pump Station
30
nvd
5
pumps
Fastside
FbRTWbRTH
APPENDIX B.
Water Pumping Capabiliti
Edwards Ranch Pump Station
30
mgd
4
pumps
Southside 11
Fleetwood Pump Station
5
mgd
4
pumps
Eastside
Jenkins Heights Pump Station
5
mgd
3
pumps
Northside III
Lago Vista Pump Station
1
mgd
4
pumps
Northside IV
McCart Pump Station
15
mgd
3
pumps_,_..
........
North Beach Pump Station
15
mgd
4
pumps
Northside 11
Sendera Ranch Pump Station
30
mgd
(New) Northside Pump Station
50
mgd
5
pumps
Northside II
(Old) Northside Pump Station
5
mgd
. .... - ------
4
pumps
Northside 11
Randol Mill Pump Station
7
. .... . . .. ... ..........
mgd
...
3
pumps
Eastside
. .........
Russom Ranch Pump Station
--. —.-- — . ..... ..........
15
mgd .. . .......
3
pumps
----- — -------
Southside Ill
Southside Reservoir Pump Station
5
mgd
2
.. ............
pumps
- ---- ----
Southside 11
Stagecoach Road Pump Station
15
mgd
4 . .
pumps
. .. ...........
Westside Ill
Westland Pump Station
10
mgd
4
pumps
. . .......... .
Westside Pump Station
20
mgd
4
pumps
Westside if
Exhibit D
Water Facilities Capital Improvement Plan
;ft ppyy'
iw4. ,atll�Rl .2deRr x $ .3L.i3. kYF i. ,kry i,..
laN�i�� 1k H4�l4f rtYS� ..._ z
I I
II
,1I
TLS
La
L I
-I.-1
A —I
LI
F
I
I
u
II 9
1,
6
1
3
1
I [ r
®J
P 1
15 I
1
1
=
°
r
i1- qll
1 1
I 1� I I
`,:
a 11 ..�1 W i P
_ -rf
i f 1 ..
•IG
1
a
1
s
(
�'r rl
rd1.1 °'`.ter- 1�•�IrCI
stir
Nr �'�L•,611
v J6N,1 I 1_-
lf,F
1
I [ r
®J
P 1
15 I
1
~tti; I -i
,r . --
�r F
v J' •
Sr' -`.�_ 7�...._. V.. -'�� mac: CG +.•J'��•
r
;L' S•el
H
t, v`2 "LA RCS fs gM
{Pn` L, ��yF "x--. �il� a L- �•�s��'+- �,i�r =�i�•'�' r� ��fS '�..�;y'r' r
b� ._� t j, C �` • —r d] •
[_�I"
r a"C Jul l I "i" r'< �y �IL ya IU`w
r 7 1 i ter.i
�/7 n f� •_-:) [��}�- i. .rte .. r 14� u 1
❑+ i ,� ll—,lti`- ' A {+ I�$ II Y g� `—E d :�IJ L� l � JrL' r+%' -�._ r''r ��
rr� ire' x� -.1,� r !<<� I� —I I�''�- '�4J IA a� •� ,-_-� 'h-°.� - ���"'* - S- �•• °"!I �' `� ,,�'' ��I {`!
�..� h ��,� � !kl III' l �. e I - F 'P'ti s. �L � t der • 1
1
l�J1 Lr1?I
'rr
r � I � 1�� �� ! �,�z -� � )1i�,7. Ir— 14� ='✓�� �a � .� i —I '�v4„r,- ti .'��r �'
V � IF {� 1i: li ]f II 'a _lu ti.�l •i� •rj� el -_
/if r �`f�i•_��! Ih �1 ��o -� Vii• -� fi S -7 r�'`'.v� .I•?:�y�e � r�• 1 7i Y`` is +�f� a.
,;__ fy�„ I ',. �',,' r���[.} si' l•✓,�rf"�i -•er � +e,�a - e I
sv LL
•'.li P i
r.. -- +
i�r� o• ad 1� r - I
�In a ii�1 . } 1y ' iL � -ir. u. e a.,. .• e�I
u � c -.' _ ae Iii x• �•:
1L-
tit�AA1.
+..
-e�I l/
v J' •
Sr' -`.�_ 7�...._. V.. -'�� mac: CG +.•J'��•
r
;L' S•el
H
t, v`2 "LA RCS fs gM
{Pn` L, ��yF "x--. �il� a L- �•�s��'+- �,i�r =�i�•'�' r� ��fS '�..�;y'r' r
b� ._� t j, C �` • —r d] •
[_�I"
r a"C Jul l I "i" r'< �y �IL ya IU`w
r 7 1 i ter.i
�/7 n f� •_-:) [��}�- i. .rte .. r 14� u 1
❑+ i ,� ll—,lti`- ' A {+ I�$ II Y g� `—E d :�IJ L� l � JrL' r+%' -�._ r''r ��
rr� ire' x� -.1,� r !<<� I� —I I�''�- '�4J IA a� •� ,-_-� 'h-°.� - ���"'* - S- �•• °"!I �' `� ,,�'' ��I {`!
�..� h ��,� � !kl III' l �. e I - F 'P'ti s. �L � t der • 1
1
l�J1 Lr1?I
'rr
r � I � 1�� �� ! �,�z -� � )1i�,7. Ir— 14� ='✓�� �a � .� i —I '�v4„r,- ti .'��r �'
V � IF {� 1i: li ]f II 'a _lu ti.�l •i� •rj� el -_
/if r �`f�i•_��! Ih �1 ��o -� Vii• -� fi S -7 r�'`'.v� .I•?:�y�e � r�• 1 7i Y`` is +�f� a.
,;__ fy�„ I ',. �',,' r���[.} si' l•✓,�rf"�i -•er � +e,�a - e I
sv LL
•'.li P i
r.. -- +
i�r� o• ad 1� r - I
�In a ii�1 . } 1y ' iL � -ir. u. e a.,. .• e�I
u � c -.' _ ae Iii x• �•:
19VP City of Fort Worth
Exhibit F
Capital • • • •
Plan
Wastewater Facilities
AM M � i •
� his
d
Table of Contents
Contents
12. ... .................. .------.......... --------..........
---F^1
1.21 Wastewater Treatment Plants. ..... —..---........... —.-------............
—F^1
1 2 Lift Stations .......... ----,---....... — ........... ------...............
........ ... F^2
U. Eligible Facilities ........ --........ ............... ------.........
..... ................. —F-3
13.1. Wastewater Treatment Plants ... —.... ----- ..............
—....... ........... --... F`4
1.32 Lift Stations and Force Mains ........ .... ____ ................ ....
— .......... ................ F�4
l3.3. Engineering Studies .... --.--..... .... ..... .... .............................
................. F`5
1.4. Growth Related O|P.— ..... —.... .... ___ ........... ............. .......... .... — ...... ............ F^7
List of Tables
Figure p'I— Existing Wastewater Facilities
Figure F'2— Proposed Wastewater Facilities
Figure F-3 —Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Schedule
Figure F-4—Lift Station Allocation
& Wastewater QpProjects
8, Wastewater Lift Station Capabilities
C. V|P for 20VB'2U19
"°* p*mm�uwm�mx n,
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
1.1. Introduction
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (11,13C), Chapter 395, the City of
Fort Worth has commissioned Red Oak Consulting, to conduct an Impact Fee Study.
This report establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous
study completed in 2004.
Impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost
associated with expanding the municipal wastewater system to accommodate growth in
the service area. The City of Fort Worth owns and operates an infrastructure intensive
system comprised oftreatment facilities, lift stations, and pipelines that are continuously
improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the wastewater system is
known as the Capital Improvements plan (CIP). The CIP was updated as a part of this
study with capital project scope and cost provided by previously commissioned master
planning documents and input from Fort Worth Water Department staff.
The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Worth wastewater
facilities are eligible to be included in the impact fee analysis. Next, the criteria for
measuring infrastructure capacity are explained for each infrastructure type. Finally, the
additional facilities required to accommodate growth during the study period are
summarized.
1.2, Capacity Criteria
1.2.1. Wastewater Treatment Plants
The '998 Village Creek Wastewater Treatment plant Uprating Study provided the
following formula for the determination of average day flow:
Qavg = BWF -t GI
Where: Qivg - Annual Average wastewater flow
BWF = Base wastewater flow defined as 80 gallons per capita per day
(gpcd) plus 40 gallons per employee per day (oped).
Cl - (ii-otititl%vater infiltration defined as3OOgtilaci-esewei,ed,
'file I Jlrabng Study also looked at the imiximuni month flow as it related to (fie annual
averatlo wastewater flow, Ebried on hisaorical data, [lie raflo was determined to be 1,
'['lie maximum slay to annual average, wastewater flow was determined to be 2,59 times
annual average flow,, with a peak 2 -hour to annual average wastewater flow ratio of 3.0 1
The following is it calculation ofthe annual average svwagg c flows. 'Ehe population and
employment projection,, were taken from the 2009 Wastewater Land Use Assumptions
and flwsewa.ge acreage land values firom the 20(P Village Creek Wastewater Treatment
REM" C1.1 VUPAI�h Vvl-oi UIEWr"new F Wb
-f 1W A m,rls Pon
C OT , fellm"
-- - -------
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
Plant Facilities Assessment Study. The population and employment projections for the
TRA Denton Creek Regional Wastewater System and TRA Central Regional Wastewater
System were subtracted from the total wastewater service area population and
employment projections for the purpose of calculating required capacities.
2009
Population = 1,029,532 X 80 gpcd — 82.4 mgd
Employment = 693,279 X 40 gpcd — 27.7 mgd
BWF = 110.1 mgd
GI = 148,863 acres X (300 gpd/acre) — 44.7 mgd
Q annual average = 110.1 + 443 = 154.8 mgd
2019
Population 1,367,376 X 80 gpcd — 109.4 mgd
Employment -- 917,248 X 40 gped -- 36.7 mgd
BWF — 146.1 mgd
GI —168,888 acres X (300 gpd/acre) = 50.7 mgd
Q annual average --: 146.1 +50.7 -- 196,8 mgd
The net increase in annual average flow for the study period is:
Increase in Annual Average Flow -- 2019 Annual Average Flow -- 2009 Annual
Average Flow
Increase in Annual Average Flog = 196.8 mgd - 154.8 mgd = 42 mgd
The Current annual average permit capacity at the Village Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant is 166 mgd. An expansion to 191 mg(l average annual flow is planned for the study
period. In addition, a satellite wastewater treatment plant is planned with a capacity of
mg([,
1.2.2. Lift Stations
'file i999 Wastewater System Master Plan is currently beiric updated and is therel'ore the
trin14 recent availabt�° master plan document. As part of the ru,,,tsler plan study, the lift
station capacity requirements were projected based on population and employment
Projections fro to the North Central Texas Council of Goveranterts tNCTCOi'0 Red Oak
revievved infonnation fi-orn the Waste),vtocr Master Plan to obtain estimated lift station
deficiencies for the impact fee study period:
P I 1MJK
MISISURIWX
wo ware! F:avw.teF,
Master Plan Population and Employment
Nado/ Plan Lift Station Deficiency
Exhibit
Wastewater Facilities Capital improvements Plan
/.J16i93%
V.Smgd
;.5O3.304
1V4mgd
The Population and employment projections included in the Land Use Assumptions
report are significantly higher than the projections above for the same years. 1oaccount
Inc this additional growth, the lift station deficiencies were increased proportionally:
2009 2019
Lane Use Assumptions Population and Employment 1.722,811 2.284,624
Projected Lift Station Deficiency 124mgd 20.0mgd
The net increase in lift station deficiencies is:
Increase in Lift Station Deficiencies =2&,Ouosd—(24rogd=15.6u*gd
1,3, Eligible Facilities
This section establishes the types of City of Fort Worth Wastewater facilities that are
eligible for inclusion iu the calculation uf the impact fee. Projects iuo)mdc8iothtClP
can serve ta rehabilitate and renew the system, enhance the system to improve efficiency
and meet regulatory requirements, increase the system capacity, or achieve a combination
ofthese objectives. Only those projects warramed by capacity issues derived from
growth occurring during tile study period (2009 to 2019) can be included in the impact
fee calculation, Additionally, projects arwnxo\udodfro/mLhuiuupacifeeou|tulmdnoifLhe
costs cannot be accurately delineated of ifalternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in
place.
Financing costs associated with the water system have been excluded due to tile dynamic
nature wf the financial markets, and the uncertainty this introduces, consistent with
previous City offort Worth impact fee Studies,
Waswwalef interceptors and collection Piping haNc ticen excluded liom this study due to
alternatc(ost, rccover} inechamosms in place, consistent With the Previous impact fee
xkuUy,|/moi|i6u*iuulmJcd imd}eir"pac/ fee study are vvmstmvvxtorbuubammtfao8i(ics,|iK
ykak*oo,and mnguurtriu8studies.
~ pwtmdwunwMuvmmp�mn m
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
Figures F- I and F-2, showing existing and proposed facilities, respectively, are included
at the end of this section.
1.3.1. Wastewater Treatment Plants
The existing wastewater treatment capacity is 166 mod. An additional 42 ri1gd of
capacity will be required during the study period, as calculated in Section 1.2.1. Of this
required capacity, 11.2 mgd is available at the existing facility (166 mod - 154.8 mgd),
Therefore, an additional 30.8 mgd is needed during the study period.
The following capital projects are eligible for inclusion in the impact tee calculation:
Westside Satellite Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase I is currently planned to
provide an additional 7 rood of capacity. This capacity would be fully utilized
during the study period.
Study period allocation = (7 mod — 0 mgd) = 7mod < 30.8 mgd
Remaining incremental demand = 30.8 mgd —7 mgd = 23.8 mgd
% Allocated for Study Period = 100%
2. Village Creek W)VI'P Expansion to 191 mod provides 25 mgd of additional
treatment capacity to increase the annual average capacity from 166 mgd to 191
mod,
Study period allocation = (191 mod -- 1166 mgd) = 25 mod > 23.8 ingil
Remaining incremental demand — 23.8 mod — 25 mod < 0
% Allocated for Study Period = 23.8 mgd / 25 ingil = 95%
Figure F-3 provides the scheduled wastewater treatment plant and storage expansions, the
projected annual average wastewater flows, and the projected 2-hour peak flows.
1.3.2. Lift Stations and Force Mains
Section 1. 2.2 calculated the net increase in lift station deficiencies to be 15.6 mod, 'rhe
wastewater CIP lists several till station projects. which are eligible for inclusion in the
impact fice calculation. 1 here lift station projects will provide an additional 47.5 mgd of
capacity. The allocation ofthe lift stations is calcuhtted below:
% Allovation for Study Period - ( 15.0 mgd: 4IT5 mgd) X 100 -32.8%
1 he. rernaiiiing 67.20,* ofthe ;osys (if tho& Projects will he allocated to future grovifli
beyond the study period.
Figure F-4 provides the comparison ofthe lift station projects and the till station capacity
required l'or future growth.
RSIMK
an
00t4 m]
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
1.3.3. Engineering Studies
There are nine studies which have been included in the calculation of the wastewater
impact fees. The studies are as follows:
I. Wastewater Facilities Plan --The Wastewater Facilities Plan updated the
wastewater treatment plant needs for the period ot'2000 through 2020. Nine years
of the twenty year study was for existing customers. Teti years of the twenty year
study was for the study period, and the balance was for the period beyond the
study period. The calculation of the allocation was as follows:
Existing Customers = 9120 " 45%
Study Period 10120 —50%
Beyond Study Period = 1120 °5%
% Allocation for Study Period = 50%
2. 1999 Wastewater Master Plan The 1999 is a planning document for the period
2000 through 2010. It is currently being updated. Therefore, 90% is for existing
and 10% is for the study period.
Existing Customers = 9110 = 90%
Study Period = 1110 = 10%
% Allocation for Study Period = 10%
3. 2009 Wa*tewater System Master Plan is ongoing and will include the planning
period 2010 through 2020. Nine of the ten years in the planning period are
included in the impact fee study period. Therefore 90% is allocated to the Study
period and the remaining 10% is allocated to the period beyond the study period,
Study Period = 91/10 =- 90%
Beyond Study Period 1/10 --10%
% Allocation for Study Period = 90%
4. Conveyance Study -The Wastewater Conveyance Study is a 20-year planning
document for the period 2000 through 2020. Nine years of the twenty year study
was fi)r existing customers. Ten years of the twenty year study was for the study
period, and the balance was for the period beyond the study period, the
calciilafica of the allocation waw as follows:
Existing Customer- 9120 45%')
Study Period 10120 50%
Beyond Stuck- Period 1120 i%
-
% Allocation for Study Period = 50%
REMAK,
(UNISIATING
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
2004 Impact Fee Study - -The 2004 Impact Fee Study provides impact fees for
the Study period 2004 through 2014. Therefore, five years of the ten-year study
period for the existing customers, and the remaining rive years are for the study
period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the other half
is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Existing Customers = 5110 —50%
Study Period = 5110 = 50%
Beyond Study Period = 0110 —0%
% Allocation for Study Period = 50%
6. 2009 Impact Fee Study —The 2009 Impact Fee Study provides impact fees for
the study period 2009 through 2019. Therefore, 100% of the study is allocated to
the study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the
other half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Existing Customers
0110 __0%
Study Period
= 10/10 = 100%
Beyond Study Period
0110 = 0%
% Allocation for Study Period = 100%
2012 Impact Fee Study -- Although the requirement is to conduct all impact fee
study every five years. the City would like to update the study every three years.
The 2012 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees for the study period 2012
through 2022. Therefore, seven years of the ten-year study period are allocated to
the study period, and the remaining three years are for the period beyond the
study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the
other half is for the wastewater impact ice update.
Existing Customers 0/10 = 0%
Study Period = 7110 —70%
Beyond Study Period = 3110 - 30%
% Allocation for Studv Period = 70%
8. 2015 Impact Fee Study --The 2015 Impact fee Study will provide impact fees
for the study period 2015 through all 202 s
5, Therefore. four years, tell-year
study Period are allocated to the study period. And the retwurung six years are for
the period beyond the study period. One half of the suj& is tor the water impact
fee update and the other halt` is fvr the cvastcwatcr impact fee update,
Existing C'ustorricrs 0.110 0%
Study Period 4/10 = 40%
Beyond Study Period 61"10 60%
F mt M Ve DP 10,?m
,
p., -A rwe
1a � �i
19
l
1.
. .- �1 fir__
1
0.
1
•'
■
R
L
_
r
l
r��
. .- �1 fir__
1
■
R
R
1 1'
L - 1
1
} i
i
r _
-_ �•1
r��
. .- �1 fir__
1
I
MA
'• riN� n �` I d Iii, y /'9�rr.a_ Sri.. •fr?
i' I
Y IWY � p I 1
2a' I-A
_I3
;.e
u ' I
as
Y
a-i...
l!'7
f
m
E i. t, u
-- I
i
Ti3i �114rrp 1 's 1�J� ,FR
it
r,�Y'3 �..L�
i' I
Y IWY � p I 1
2a' I-A
_I3
;.e
u ' I
as
Y
a-i...
l!'7
f
m
E i. t, u
-- I
i
-1 Al 71,
I
n —.r I L
Ti ate
71
lea
.-"
i
33
l
°
P
p
7
°
1
lei
L
J
II
I,A
I I
°
to
8
1
L
I
e
((yy
"r
p
1E
1
f"
—64:
•
r}
1
1
1
1
1
r
I
°J
I
I
1 1
rl
L
1
II
•
L
I L A .. -R J J
r� ..r_ _.e
•�
l e
m _
c �a - cr _ I sr.
: a �_ ....
� '. u
��
�� yll ,
jww,l� q�
� �; �,
=, jl''
r �
F4
��� a� �.
� � �I
�� I I
i�
L'
' L �
1;
.
a
�.�
u =stil �!�1 /y��....:.��y...
-'J�r
�__'L'.II�.VA�
1
(l �
i—� e -- -•- -. - e --- • - -..-, --� -— �
e_— x� _ _ �.. _ _ .� r . -. ca - _ ___ s. a e.. .,_ __`____ —
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
RHOAK
Mai
♦wmfq� ff fw�cf x•fy pfd Y$ t 3 {t5 F a lutes
Appendix A
WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS
Project Title: (V -1A) VCWWTP Peak Flow Diversion Structure (Equalization Basin for Peak Flows)
Description: Design and construction of a wastewater diversion and peak flow storage basin
adjacent to the Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (VCWWTP).
Purpose: Detention facility will equalize the peak influent flows to the VCW WTP. The
siphon improvement project will allow higher peak flows to the VCWWTP. This
project will divert and store the peak flows for later treatment.
Allocation: The peak flow diversion facility will increase the peak flow plant capacity from
the current 369 MGD to 500 MGD. The projected peak flow is 500 mgd. The
allocation for the study period is 26.2% (500 mgd — 369 mgd) / 500 mgd =
26.2 %)
Status: Planning
Project Title: (V -1B) VCWWTP Junction Box Rehabilitation (oversized to 191 MGD expansion)
Description: Design and construction of rehabilitation/ capacity improvements to the plant
junction boxes that collect and convey raw wastewater into VCW WTP. This
project will be aligned with/ in preparation for the capacity improvements
proposed from 166 MGD to 191 MGD.
Purpose: The current junction boxes need to be rehabilitated to mitigate impacts for
hydrogen sulfide related corrosion for the near and long term. As part of this
project flow management via these junction boxes will be evaluated to
determine the best improvements to align with the expansion to 191 MGD.
Allocation: The junction box facilities will be sized/ rehabilitated for future treatment
capacity expansion from 166 MGD to 191MGD. This project is allocated 13.1%
to the study period (191 mgd - 166 mgd) / 191 mgd).
Status: Planning.
Project Title: (V-1Q VCW WTP Primary Area Odor & Corrosion Control Improvements (oversized to
191 MGD expansion)
Description: The existing primary area odor control and odor treatment facilities will be
rehabilitated and expanded to provide for future expansion that will be
provided with the project to replace Primary Clarifiers 1 -12.
Purpose: The existing inadequate odor collection system and chemical treatment system
will be updated with newer technology to better treat odors at a more cost
effective and sustainable method. Improving odor systems will also reduce
corrosion of concrete and steel facilities; extending the life of equipment.
Allocation: The odor and corrosion control system will be sized for future replacement of
Primary Clarifiers 1 -12 that will increase the treatment capacity from 166 MGD
to 191MGD. This project is allocated 13.1% to the study period (191 mgd -166
mgd) / 191 mgd).
Status: Planning.
Project Title: (W1) Westside Satellite WWTP Phase 1
Description: Land purchase, design and construction for a satellite WWTP to address growth
related needs in the sewershed serving the Westside area.
Purpose: Provide sewage treatment needs to address growth needs by installing a new
treatment plant to serve the Westside area. This will eliminate the need to
expand/ add collection system infrastructure or expansion of VCW WTP facilities
beyond 191 MGD to address the Westside growth needs.
Allocation: This project is needed for growth during the planning period and is allocated
100% for growth.
Status: Planning.
Project Title: (V2 -A) VCWWTP Expansion to 191 MGD (Phase 2A - secondary systems expansion -
aeration, clarifier, filter, hydraulics, pumping)
Des(ription: Design and construction of Village= Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
treatment facilities to increase capacity from 166 to 191 MGD,
Purpose: To increase treatment plant capacity to meet growth needs.
Allocation: This project is allocated 13.1 %to the study period (191 mgd -166 mgd) / 191
mgd).
Status. Planning,
Project Title: (V-2B) VCVVWqP Replace Primary Clarifiers 1`12&Grit System (Phase 2Bof1g1m#gd
expansion)
Description: Design and construction for the replacement of primary clarifiers 1-12 and
addition ofa new grit removal system sized 0n meet the l9lM6Dexpansion
requirements,
Purpose: Primary clarifiers 1'1IatYCVVVVTP are n hydraulic bottleneck which needs tube
addressed ou realize the planned expansion ho191M6D.|n addition tn being a
hydraulic bottleneck, the reliability of the clarifiers are impacted bylarge
amounts uf grit (particularly at higher Oows). These clarifiers need tobe
replaced before the l9lMGB capacity can be realized and onew grit removal
system needs to be added to increase reliability in capacity and treatment.
Allocation: In addition to a new grit removal system, the primary clarifiers will be replaced
and sized for future treatment capacity expansion from 168M6Dio19lM6D.
This project is allocated 15.2&to the study period (191oo0d-l66nogd)/19l
mNd).
Status: Planning,
Project Title: (V2-C) Village Creek Gravity Belt Thickeners tp Replace 0AFs (Phase 2Cw@t91
Expansions)
Description: Design and construction for the replacement of existing Dissolved Air Flotation
(DAF) thickeners with a new Gravity Belt Thickener system sized to meet the
191KxGD expansion requirements.
Purpose: The existing DAF system bin need of rehabilitation and the solids thickening
system is in need of expansion. The DAY units will be replaced with Gravity Belt
Thickeners (GBT) which is more efficient at thickening both primary and
secondary solids and/or combined solids. The replacement nfDAFs with 6BTS
will include expansion of the solids thickening systems to provide capacity for
the planned VCVVVVTP expansion [o18lMGD plus the 7MGD capacity tntreat
the solids from the new VVestsidw Satellite VVVYTP.
ADmc*Uon: The new DAF solids thickm^i"Wsystmrnv,itlbn sized for the future V(W\NYP
treatment capacity mxpmnsi#o from 166KA6Dt"1D1POGO ThenmwmnNdo
!hickLning system wilt also have the additional caka(ityCw thicken the solids
produced by the new 7h0GDVVestside Satellite xV\mTP. This project isz/luca1ed
l6.2%\o the study period (198ingd- 160/oQd)/198 n)Xd)
Status: Planning.
Project Title: (V -3) VCWWTP South Influent Pump Station
Description: Design and construction of a new VCWWTP South Influent Pump Station to lift
current and future flows received from the Village Creek Interceptors to the
Headworks Screening Facilities.
Purpose: Flows from the Village Creek Interceptors currently pass through Bar Screen
Building No. 3, which is in need of significant repairs and upgrades , and is
located at the southeast corner of the VCWWTP. Flows from the Village Creek
Interceptor system will be routed to the new Headworks Screening Facilities
located at the northwest corner of the VCWWTP, so that the wastewater can be
adequately screened and peak flows can be treated by the high -rate clarification
system and/or the future Peak Flow Diversion Structure. The Village Creek
Interceptors are at a lower elevation than the Headworks Screening Facility,
therefore a pump station will be needed to transport the flows from the south
to the northeast corner of the VCWWTP.
Allocation: A parallel interceptor was recently constructed in the Village Creek Sewer Basin
to increase the basin flow capacity from 90 MGD to 280 MGD. The lift station
will be sized to transport peak flows during this study period. The projected
peak flow capacity of the VCWWTP is being increased from current 369 MGD to
556 MGD with the completion of Project V -1A and V -2A. The allocation for the
study period is 33.6% (556 mgd — 369 mgd) / 556 mgd = 316 %)
Status: Planning.
Project Title: (V -4A) VCWWTP Biosolids Dewatering for Land Application (additional dewatering
facilities for VCWWTP 191 MGD expansion + Westside Satellite 7 MGD WWTP solids)
Description: Design and construction of biosolids dewatering facilities.
Purpose: Provide biosolids dewatering facilities needed to produce a dewatered biosolid
that can be transported efficiently for beneficial reuse land application..
Allocation: The biosolids dewatering system will be sized for the future VCWWTP treatment
capacity expansion from 166 MGD to 191 MGD. The biosolids dewatering
system will also have the additional capacity to dewater the solids produced by
the new 7 MGD Westside Satellite WWTP . This project is allocated 16.2% to
the study period 1198 mgd - 166 mgml / L98 mgd).
Description: Design and construction of anaerobic digester facilities to treat wastewater
treatrent plant solids from the expanded VCWSP:TP and the new Westside
Satellite WWTP fac lrtres.
IN
Purpose: Replace, expand and improve the current anaerobic digester facilities to provide
solids treatment for the VCWWTP expansion to 191 and the 7 MGD Westside
Satellite W WTP.
Allocation: The Anaerobic digestion treatment system will be sized for the future VCWWTP
treatment capacity expansion from 166 MGD to 191 MGD. The anaerobic
digester system will also have the additional capacity to treat the solids
produced by the new 7 MGD Westside Satellite W WTP . This project is allocated
16.2% to the study period (198 mgd - 166 mgd) / 198 mgd).
Status: Planning
Project Title: (V -4C) Anaerobic Digested Solids Dewatering Sidestream Treatment, 166 mgd to 198
mgd (VCWWTP 191 MGD Expansion + Westside Satellite 7 MGD WWTP Solids)
Description: Design and construction of sidestream treatment facilities to treat flows
associated with dewatering of anaerobically digested solids for current and
future expansion capacities.
Purpose: The decant waters and wash waters from the dewatering systems produce a
significant amount of ammonia that is currently returned to the VCWWTP
headworks for treatment. Providing sidestream treatment of the ammonia in a
compact system will reduce the loads and capacity requirements of the
conventional secondary treatment systems.
Allocation: Theanaerobic digested solids dewatering sidestream treatment system will be
sized for the future VCWWTP treatment capacity expansion from 166 MGD to
191 MGD. The sidestream treatment system will also have the additional
capacity to treat the sidestream liquids produced by the new 7 MGD Westside
Satellite WWTP. This project is allocated 16.2% to the study period (198 mgd -
166 mgd) J 198 mgd).
Status: Planning
Project Title: (V -5) VCWWTP Disinfection Alternative & Expansion - Regulatory Change from Gas
W
Descnptirrm Convert frorn gas chlorin.- disinfection to alternatives that arity include liq ,<d
chlorine, ultraviolet light, ozone or a combination of these =.
Purpose: Proposed legislation and/or enhanced security requirements will prompt the
conversion from gas chlorine to other disinfection treatment chemicals f
facilities.
Allocation: The disinfection alternative facilities will be sized for the expanded treatment
capacity of 191MGD. This project is allocated 13.1% to the study period (191
mgd - 166 mgd) / 191 mgd).
Status: Planning.
WASTEWATER LIFT STATIONS
Project Title: Bonds Ranch Lift Station Force Main and Gravity Main A
Description: Design and construction of a 6.0 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future
growth. This lift station will receive flows from the Bonds Ranch Lift Station B.
Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide growth future wastewater service to
the northwest portions of the service area.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Bonds Ranch Lift Station Force Main and Gravity Main B
Description: Design and construction of a 5.0 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future
growth. This lift station will receive flows from the Bonds Ranch Lift Station C.
Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide growth future wastewater service to
the northwest portions of the service area.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status.: Planning
Project Titie: Bonds Ranch Lift Station Force Main and Gravity Main C
Description: Design and construction of a 4.0 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future
growth.
Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide growth future wastewater service to
the northwest portions of the service area.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Fossil Creek Lift Station & 60" Force Main
Description: Design and construct a new lift station adjacent to the connection of the Fossil
Creek interceptor with the 96" M280 and M338 interceptors. A new 60" force
main paralleling M280 and M338 from the Fossil Creek Lift Station to the
VCWWTP
Purpose: Transport system peak flows and provide additional future capacity to the
treatment plant future capacity.
Allocation: The lift station and force main will be sized for the future VCWWTP treatment
capacity expansion from 166 MGD to 191MGD. The lift station and force main
will be sized to transport peak flows that will be transported to an expanded
treatment facility. This project is allocated 11.0% to the study period (33.6% X
32.8 %). The remaining capacity is allocated to provide 66.4% for the existing
capacity and 22.6% for system capacity beyond the study period.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Woodvale Low Pressure Sewer System
Description: Design and construct a pressure sewer system to serve an area adjacent to the
lake and currently served by septic system.
Purpose: Provide new sanitary sewer service to existing homes and area.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Lake Worth North Lift Station and Force Main
Description: Design and construction of a 1.5 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future
growth. This lift station will send flows to the Jenkins Heights lift station.
Purpose: The purpose of this expansion/ rehabilitation is to provide future wastewater
service to growth related service areas.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Love Circle / West Lake Worth Lift Station and Force Main
Description: Construction of a 0.5 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future growth. This
lift station will send flows to the Jenkins Heights lift station.
Purpose: The purpose of this expansion/ rehabilitation is to provide future wastewater
service to growth related service areas.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Meadow Lakes Lift Station Expansion (additional pumps)
Description: Design and install additional wastewater pumps to expand the existing lift
station capacity
Purpose: The lift station is being expanded to provide additional wastewater service
capacity to growing area.
Allocation: I he proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 112). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the reraining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Live Oak Creek Regional Lift Station and Force Main
Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the lift station and force main from
2.5 mgd to 4.5 mgd firm capacity to serve future growth.
Purpose: The purpose of this expansion/ rehabilitation is to provide future wastewater
service to growth related service areas.
Allocation: This project is provides 75% for growth and 25% for rehabilitation. The
proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity requirements
during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of the 75% growth
allocation results in a 24.6% capacity allocation during the study period. The
allocation for this project is 25% to existing capacity, 24.6% for capacity during
the study period and the remaining 56.4% is for future growth beyond the year
2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Lake Benbrook South Regional Lift Station and Force Main
Description: This diversion lift station will route wastewater flow from the area west and
south of Benbrook Lake in the Clear Fork Major Basin to a point in the Village
Creek Major Basin.
Purpose: The purpose of this lift station is to provide future wastewater service to the
southwestern portions of the service area.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32.8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Walsh Ranch Lift Station and Force Main
Description: Construction of a 3.0 mgd firm capacity lift station to serve future growth.
Purpose: The purpose of this expansion/ rehabilitation is to provide future wastewater
service to growth related service areas.
Allocation: The proposed capacity of the lift station projects exceeds the capacity
requirements during the study period (see Exhibit F, Section 1.2.2). 32,8% of
the Lift Station cost is allocated to the study period and the remaining 67.2% is
for future growth beyond the year 2019.
Status: Planning
WASTEWATER ENGINEERING STUDIES
Project Title: 2009 Wastewater Master Plan 2010.2020
Description: Engineering Study
Purpose: This wastewater master plan update will project the system flows and needs for
the year 2010 -2020.
Allocation: This wastewater master plan will cover the planning period from the year 2010
through the year 2020 but is expected to be updated after 10 years. Therefore,
nine years of the ten year capital study is for the study period, and the balance
is for the period beyond the study period. Therefore, 90% of the Master Plan is
for the study period.
Status: Ongoing
Project Title: 2019 Wastewater Master Plan 2020 -2030
Description: Engineering Study
Purpose: This wastewater master plan update will project the system flows and needs for
the year 2020 -2030.
Allocation: This wastewater master plan will cover the planning period from the year 2020
through the year 2030 but is expected to be updated after 10 years. Therefore,
none of the ten year capital study is for the study period, and the balance is for
the period beyond the study period. Therefore, 0% of the Master Plan is for the
study period.
Status: Planning
Project Title: Wastewater Impact Fee Study 2009 -2019
Description: Aar engincxering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maxiolurn allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 100% of the cost for the 2009 study can be allocated to the planning period,
Che impart Fee covers watea acrd wastewater, with SW4, allocated to each.
Status: On-going
Project Title: Wastewater Impact Fee Study 2012-2022
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 70% of the cost for the 2012 study can be allocated to the planning period. The
impact fee covers water and wastewater, with 50% allocated to each,
Status: Planning
Project Title: Wastewater Impact Fee Study 2015-2025
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 40% of the cost for the 2015 study can be allocated to the planning period. The
impact fee covers water and wastewater, with 50% allocated to each,
Status: Planning
Project Title: Wastewater Impact Fee Study 2018-2029
Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the
maximum allowable fee which can be assessed.
Purpose: By statute the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five
years.
Allocation: 10% of the cost for the 2018 :.tu dy can be allocated tot the plaoreng period fb(--
impact fee covers water and wastewater, with SO% allocated to each,
Status: Planning
11
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
APPENDIX B: Wastewater Lift Station Capabilities
a y*
^. *' f a�vt^�^nwaaasW. xnau Vi3SS�:.N"fYtiY3G. t t'i �o R006=37M 0' ' t v iY
>
t j
IbRT%bRTH APPENDIX B.
Fort Worth Lift Stations
( NSITHNC-
) tj I
A- J
WASTEWATER LIFT STATION
No. Name Address Capacity Configuration
Calmont 6200 Calmont 0.5
2 Castle Circle 9101 Heron Dr 1 mgd 2 pumps
Dosier Creek 9241 Boat Club Rd
4
Eagle Ranch
6692 Robertson Rd
1
mgd
2
pumps
5
Enchanted Bay
5600 Vesta Farley Rd
1
mild
2
pumps
6
Glen Mills
9091 Saginaw Blvd
I
mgd
2
pumps
7
Greenway
1000 Nixon Rd
2
mgd
2
pumps
9
Intel #1
3001 Eagle Pkwy
3
........... .
mgd
4
pumps
10
Intel #2
3200 Keller-Haslet Rd
4
mgd
4
pumps
11
Jenkin Heights
4525 Norris Valley Dr
2
mgd
2
pumps
12
Lake Worth
6201 Cahoba Dr . ........ .
2
mgd
2
pumps
13
Lake Country #11
9401 Boat Club Rd
..... .............
1
mgd
2
pumps
14
Lake Country 412
9341 Mountain Lake
0,5
mgd
2
pumps
15
Lake Courori#13
9331 Dosier Cove W
0.5
road
2
pumps
16
Lake Country #2
1903 Skylake Dr
0 5
mgd
2
pumps
17
Lake Country 93
8831 Random Rd
O 5
mgd
2
pumps
18
Lakr (" notry 04
9033 Oo5swind Dr
I
mgd
2
pumps
am
WASTEWATER LIFT STATIONS
Fort Worth Lift Stations
^^"
�����7�}l�.^
-w~ u�^~�-�`/
*�
No. Name Address Capacity Configuration
19 Lake Country #6 04Z0 Crosswind D 05 mgd 2 pumps
IO Live Oak 7]1 Verna Tr| 2 rnd 2
���.....~_--pu^mm»--'-_--_
21 Meadow Lake
22 Mosier
~-~ NosierVo||c 3- 1 2-O-H-o_u-s_e--A'n_d-r.r.s-n~n.-K._d 1 ~ ./ngd '-_--- Z
--'po»pu--_-----_-
Z] Richardson Slough 79990|d6 b Rd J
10499 Old Crowley Cleburne
24 Rosemary Ridge Rd 15 mgd l pumps
Z] Sendera Send Ranch 109Z Avondale | d
26 Spring Ranch
27 Summer Creek 9898VO h Ad S
28 Sunset C 85O5 Lake Country Dr 2
29 Western Hills 2717G|enmzck 85md 2 pumps
30 Winn Dixie 20O5VV Loop 820 05 mgd 2 pumps
Exhibit F
Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan
.... . ........ .
F 3
MWETING
I
I
IL
I
L;
I r E
r,
I
01
I LI
L I
i-O
LI
I" I T-17 F
1 71
fir
I a
I
I
'14
IL
N-A ir
r
IL
_jri A
el
'iCE L.,
r-L
p��� �� ��
� Fort Worth, Texas
COUNCIL : Approved on - Ordinance No. 18518~03~2009
DATE: Tuesday, March 24.2084 REFERENCE NO.: G-18506
SUBJECT:
Conduct Public Hearing and Adopt Ordinance Amending Land Use Assumptions and Capital
Improvements Plan for Water and Wastewater Facilities
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing on the adoption of the amended Land Use Assumptions and the Capital
Improvements Plan for Water and Wastewater Facilities relating to the possible amendment and adoption
0i impact fees; and
2. Adopt the ordinance amending the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements for Water and
Wastewater Facilities.
DISCUSSION:
Section 395.052 of the Local Government Code requires that City update its Land Use Assumptions and
Capital Improvements Plan at least every five years and amended as necessary to reflect any changes in
the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and the Impact Fee Ordinance, The Land Use
Assumptions amendment includes amending the Service Area boundaries and population poo�eohon&.The
Capital |nnp/oven88nt8Plan includes amending the list ofinnp8Ct fee eligible y costs
ten years based on the amended Land Use Assumptions. The City is further required tn hold apublic
hearing to discuss the amendments to the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan, The
City hired the consultant RedOak Consulting, a division of Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., to prepare the
amendments k} the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan through CitxSecretary
Contract No. ]7758. �
The amendments have been available for public inspection since February 20, 2009, in the Fort Worth
City Secretary's Office and in the Water Department Administration Office, <]A February 24.2089. the Ci0
Council approved a resolution calling for a public hearing to consider the adoption of the amended Land
'
Use Assumptions and Capital |MlP[oven"mntmP|an
Thereafierandin6ocordancewv|dJChapter195,050 of the Local Government Code, Dn March 5.2009.
the Capital |Np/o«mmmn1s Plan Advisory Cmmmoiffea /Cf\C)adopbed the Land Use Assumptions and
CapAal Improvernents Planwith recommended changes as shown in Exhibit "l " Staff recommends Uho1
the City Council adopt the 8i)78Aded Land Use Assumptions and Capital ;mpnJwe,meu[S Plan as revised
through written comment hy the CAC by adoption of the attached ordinance,
Services Direvor aqfifie7 Thai this ac'ion w4i have no fnamlna� 04ec! on C&i
funds.
FUND CENTERS:
• Flu ml/Accou nt/Centers
CERTIFICATIONS:
• IN of 01
Logriame: 60 1 A N D U S E A N D C H' PH
FROM Fund/Account/Centers
Fernando Costa (6122)
S. Frank Crumb (8207)
Nowzar Dinyarian (8256)
jlao�l -1 of 2
1