Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5346 ORDINANCE NO. ���y� AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF IMPROVE- MENTS AND OF AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON A PORTION OF -- OX ST EFT AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TO THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND TO ALL OTHERS INTERESTED; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILLING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE .ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has heretofore ordered that each of the hereinafter described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be im- proved by raising, grading and filling same and by constructing thereon the following, to-wit: 1. Cox Street: From Dillard Street to Burger Street, known and designated as Unit No. 1, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 2. Cox Street: From Burger Street to Stalcup Road, known and designated as Unit No. 2, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 3. Dillard Street: From Cox Street to Turner Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 4. Dillard Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 5. Burger Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 5, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 6. Pinson Street: From Village Creek Road to Walker Street, known and designated as Unit No. 6, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 7. Pinson Street: From Walker Street to Dillard Street, known and designated as Unit No. 7, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 8. Pinson Street: From Dillard Street to Burger Street, known and designated as Unit No. 8, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 9. Pinson Street: From Burger Street to Stalcup Road, known and designated as Unit No. 9, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 10. Lena Street: From Cottey Street to Fitzhugh Street, known and designated as Unit No. 10, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 11. Fitzhugh Street: From Langston Street to Village Creek Road, known and designated as Unit No. 11, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 12. Fitzhugh Street: From Village Creek Road to Walker Street, known and designated as Unit No. 12, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 13. Fitzhugh Street: From Walker Street to Dillard Street, known and designated as Unit No. 13, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 14. Vincennes Avenue: From Willie Street (north) to Dunbar Street, known and designated as Unit No. 14, a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 to 26 foot roadway. together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other� necessary incidentals and appurtenances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and in strict accordance with the Plans and Specifications therefor; and contract therefor has been made and entered into with S.R.O. ASPHALTIC, INC.;_ ; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has caused the Public Works Director to prepare and file estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of the amounts per front foot proposed to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof, and such estimates have been ex- amined. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I. Such estimates be, and they are hereby adopted and approved. Il. It is hereby found and determined that the cost of improvements on each portion of street, avenue and public place hereinafter described, with the amount or amounts per front foot proposed to be assessed for such improvements against abutting property and the owners thereof, are as follows, to-wit: 1. Cox Street: From Dillard Street to Burger Street, known and designated as Unit No. 1 The estimated cost of improvements is $______j_2,_6,�5__; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $_3_9-5--;�'the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 9-97 2. Cox Street: From Burger Street to Stalcup Road, known and designated as Unit No. 2. The estimated cost of improvements is $______l0,990.65 __; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and .-utter is s--1.92- the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3-95 42, ; the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 3. Dillard Street: From Cox Street to Turner Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 7,302.90 the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $3.95 ; the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 4. Dillard Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4. The estimated cost of improvements is $8,077Q the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 ; the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 5. Burger Street: From Turner Street to Pinson Street, known and designated as Unit No. 5. The estimated cost of improvements is $---8,D.9j•60 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 ; the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 6. Pinson Street: From Village Creek Road to Walker Street, known and designated as Unit No. 6, The estimated cost of improvements is $ 13,698.03 the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 7. Pinson Street: From Walker Street to Dillard Street, known and designated as Unit No. 7. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 11,641.02 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be asst s6V against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 ; the total estima�e 7amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 8. Pinson Street: From Dillard Street to Burger Street, known and designated as Unit No. 8. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 10,662.58 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 ; the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 9. Pinson Street: From Burger Street to Stalcup Road, known and designated as Unit No. 9. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 11;280.22 the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter ift $—_ 3.,_g __ _; the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 10. Lena Street: From Cottey Street to Fitzhugh Street, known and designated as Unit No. 10. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 12,524.05 __; the esti-mated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 ; the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 11. Fitzhugh Street: From Langston Street to Village Creek Road, known and designated as Unit No. 11. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 1,1,.7 17 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1 9Z_—; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $-3.95 the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5 S7 12. Fitzhugh Street: From Village Creek Road to Walker Street, known and designated as Unit No. 12. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 12,316-.45--; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 13. Fitzhugh Street: From Walker Street to Dillard Street, known and designated as Unit No. 13 The estimated cost of improvements is $ 14,660.52 the estimated amount per front foot to be assles6d against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 ; the total estimateamount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is 14. Vincennes Avenue: From Willie Street (north) to Dunbar Street, known and designated as Unit No. 14. The estimated cost of improvements is $ 6,739.15 _; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for combined concrete curb and gutter is $ 1.92 ; the estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof for improvements exclusive of curb and gutter is $ 3.95 the total estimated amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is $ 5.87 III. A hearing be given and held by and before the City Council of the City of Fort North, Texas, to all own- ing or claiming any property abutting upon said portions of streets, avenues and public places, as well as to all owning or claiming any interest in any such property. Such hearing shall be given and held on the_.12tb day of April 19 65at—9:30 A.M. , in the Council Chamber in the City Hall in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the time and place of such hearing and of other matters and facts in accordance with the terms and provisions of an Act passed at the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, and known as Chapter 106 of the Acts of said Ses- sion, now benig shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. Such notice shall be by advertisement at least three times in a newspaper published in the City of Fort North, Texas, the first publication to be made at least ten days before the date of said hearing. Said notice shall comply with' and be in accordance with the terms and provisions of said Act. The City Secretary is further directed to give personal notice of the time and place of such hearing to all owning or claiming any property abutting on said portions of streets, avenues and public places, as well as to all owning or claiming any interest in any such property. Such personal notice shall be given by the City Secretary mailing said notice postage prepaid, to the respective owners of record of the properties to be assessed, and to any person owning or claiming any interest in said properties, to the last known address of said owner or persons. It shall not be necessary for the City Secretary to mail said notices to any owner or other person claiming an interest in the property to be assessed when the addess of such owner or other person claiming an interest in the property to be assessed is unknown to the City Secretary and cannot be determined by the City Secretary after reasonable investigation. In this connection the City Secretary shall prepare and file with these proceedings a list of the properties to be assessed, the names of those persons own- ing or claiming any interest in said properties to whom the notice was mailed, together with the last known address of the respective owners and those persons owning or claiming any interest in said property. The.City Secretary shall certify that each of the parties named in said list whose address was known to him, was mailed a copy of the notice of hearing and shallfurther certify the date or dates on which said notice was mailed. A copy of the notice shall be attached to such certificate. The certificate of the City Secretary will be conclusive evidence of the facts therein recited. Failure of the City Secretary to give notice of hearing by mail as herein provided for, or failure of the owners or other persons interested to receive said notice, shall in nowise invalidate said hearing or any assessments levied pursuant to said hearing, but notice of hearing shall be sufficient, valid and binding upon all owning or claiming such abutting property or any interest therein when same shall have been given by newspaper advertisement as first hereinabove provided. IV. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Records.of this City.Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance V. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage. Passed and approved this__ day of__-___ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney W NURN" tc -'MAN �r 9 h -- ('1J*i,I ` yfi 6, own` r r c ee- F;. r rr q' " c rF 8UNCHE PAF? �I ARc� IN, r -T- 1 C •F \�H` u Lt L `' _ -- y `tel �r t F ._8 •r 9T ` . -'. //I • QO 1 ry • .:\:t' ..; � �l ��-,=�-'�� ��� :r - �{�1. ;;gyyp�""gg %/ ' 1Ilk 10 lip It /1.,..•, iILAGE �' / '�. CR..EE,. L% •.`PARK E � goo ARLINGTON LOCATION MAP` ASSESSMENT PAVIWG � 1�4: LOCATIOW-SAN THE DUNBAR SCHOOL . - . AREA PUBLIC WORKS EMG1NEERING DEPARTMENT ®IVISIOW C. Me TWELIN Me W, A-MIS JR. DIRECTOR CHIEF ENGINEER 097 - 24000-- 137 ATTA NT "B" FACE 1 of 15 14 LOCATIONS IN THE DUNBAR SCHOOL AREA PER Project'097-24000=137 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 1439135,.-50 ENGINEERING ............................................................................... 149313.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 157,449.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.., 19 9081.62 94.9 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 19031.00 5.1 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 20 9 112.62 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 1129009.15 71.2 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 69051.97 3.8 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 1189061.12 75.0 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................. 18,417__59 11.7 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT...............................................................................................................................999643.53* 63.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................$ 57y805.52* 36.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 20,112.62 6,457.75 PER CENT 100.0 32.1 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 224 90 THE CUMULATIVE RESULT$ PER CENT 100.0 40.2 OF THE POST CARD SURVEY ARE AVAILABLE UPON NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 202 78 REQUEST. PER CENT 100.0 38.6 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 99 56 PER CENT 100 56.6 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 103 22 PER CENT 100.0 21.4 Council approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net Assessments to $989983.53 and increase the City's cost to $589465.52. ATTACHMENT "B" Page 2 of 15 COX STREET DILLARD TO BURGER Unit 1 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................s 11,503.50 ENGINEERING ...............................................................................................I.............. 11150.35 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 129653.85 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 11,5'37®2 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1105370 2 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 9,023.36 71.3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -a -0- GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED.............................................................I.................,.......,..$ 99023.36 71.3 LESSCREDITS GRANTED......................................................................I......................... 776.48 6.1 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 89246.88 65.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 49406.'97 34.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1.537.2 886.6 348.6 128.0 1,06M PER CENT 100.0 57.7 22.7 8.3 69.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 16 8 . 4 1 11 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 25.0 6.2 68.8 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 15 7 4 1 10 PER CENT 100.0 46.7 26.7 6.6 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 10 5 3 1 6 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 60.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 5 2 1 -0- 4 PER CENT 100.0 40.0 20.0 -0- 80.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 3 of 15 COX STREET BURGER TO STALCUP PER Unit 2 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 99991.50 ENGINEERING ............................................................................... 999.15 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 109990.65 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19312.8 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19 312.8 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 79706.14 70.1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$79706,14 .. 70.1 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 651.53 5.9 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 74054.56 64.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$39936.09 35.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19312.8 441.4 55.0 810:.4 PER CENT 100.0 33.6 4.2 62.2 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 13 3 1 9 PER CENT 100.0 Q 23.1 7.7 69.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 3 1 9 PER CENT 100.0 2:3.1 7.7 69.0 H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 2 -0- 1 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 -0- 33.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 1 1 8 PER CENT 100.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 4 of 15 DILLARD STREET COX STREET TO TURNER STREET Unit 3 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 69639.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 663.90 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 79302.90 10000 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1 9 120.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -()- so,. TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19 1200 0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 69574040 90.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0-- GROSS -0mGROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 69574040 90.0 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 29686.40 36.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 39888o 00 53.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................s39414.90 46.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1 x,120.0 "Q" 560.0 560.0 PER CENT 1.00.0 r0® 50.0 50.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 -0- 2 7 PER CENT 10000 .,0_ 5000 50.0 f-� d 4 m0� NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 E-0 PER CENT 100.0 z ®0" 50.0 50.0 H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET m0- H -0- "0" (L. PER CENT `0- Chi ®(- "O- ®U^ OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 -0- 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 5000 50.0 ATTAINT "BOB PAGE 5 of 15 3DILIARD STREET TURNER TO PINSON PER Unit 4 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 7,343.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 734.30 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 8,077.30 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,120.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1$120.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 6,574.40 81.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -0- GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 6,574.40 81.4 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 19768.40 21.9 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 4-18-0-6-0-0- 59.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 3,271.30 40.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,120.0 410.0 3r®m 250.0 565.0 PER CENT 100.0 36.6 27.2 22.3 50.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 13 8 6 1 6 PER CENT 100.0 61.5 46.5 7.6 46.2 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 11 8 6 1 4 PER CENT 100.0 72.7 54.5 9.1 36.4 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 9 7 6 -0- 3 PER CENT 100.0 77.8 66.7 -0- 33.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 1 ®0- 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 -0- 50.0 50.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 6 of 15 BURGER STREET TURNER TO PINSON PER Unit 5 CENT CONTRACT PRICE............................................................................................................$ 7,356.00 ___ ENGINEERING .............................................................—.......I....... 735,60 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 89091®60 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE. 19 120,0 100"o COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. —0—� -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19 120,O 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$69574.40 8102 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT—.................. —0— � —0— GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED...................................................................................—....$ 695'74.40 81,2 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 24551.40 3105 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 4.023,00 4907 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE................................................... ......................$49068060 50.3 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PA9ING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19120.0 —0- 230„0 890. 0 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 20.5 79.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 5 —0® 1 4 PER CENT 1-00.0 -0- 20.0 80.0 5 -0- 1 4 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS PER CENT 100.0 -0- 2000 80.0 H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 100.0 -0® 33.3 6607 PER CENT o—� OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 100.0 -0- -0- 10000 PER CENT �t d. 41 ATTACHMENT "8" PAGE 7 of 15 PINSON STREET VILLAGE CREEK ROAD TO WALKER Unit 6 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE..................................................................I.........................................5129452.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1 9 245.28 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 139698.03 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19270.0 71.8 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 498.0 28.2 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19768.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................; 79454.91 54.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 29923.26 21.3 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................S 109378.17 75.7 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 742.71 5.4 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 9.635.46 * 70.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$49062.57 29.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19768.0 381.0 304.0 625.0 839.0 PER CENT 100.0 21.5 17.2 35.4 47.4 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 15 4 4 4 7 PER CENT 100.0 26.7 26.7 26.7 46.6 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 3 3 4 6 PER CENT 100.0 23.1 23.1 30.8 46.1 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 3 2 1 -O- PER CENT 100.0 100.0 66.7 33.3 -D- OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 -0- 1 3 6 PER CENT 100:0 -0- 10.0 30.0 60.0 '1E Council approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net Assessments to $99595.46 and increase the City's cost to $49102.57. ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 8 of 15 PINSON STREET WALKER TO DILLARD Unit 7 PER CENT CONTRACT PRICE................................................... ................,.........$ 10,582.75 ENGINEERING ...........................................................................................-................ 19058.27 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 11,641.02 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,425.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -O- -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1,42500 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$89364.78 71.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -0- GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 8,364078 71.9 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 669.78 5.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 7$695.00 66.1 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$31,946.02 33.9 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 11425.0 683.75 430.0 -0- 995.0 PER CENT 100.0 48.0 30.2 -0- 69.8 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 17 9 5 -0- 12 PER CENT 100.0 52.9 29.4 -0- 70.6 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 16 8 5 -0- 11 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 31.3 -0- 68.7 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 12 7 4 -0- 8 PER CENT 100.0 58.3 33.3 -0- 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 1 1 -0- 3„ PER CENT 100.0 25.0 25.0 -0- 75.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 9 of 15 PINSON STREET DILLARD TO BURGER PER Unit 8 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 9,693.25 ENGINEERING ................................................................................................-........... 969.33 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 103,662e58 10010 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 12560.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- -,- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1 3,560 e 0 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 93,157.20 85.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT..................... -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................5 99157.20 85.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED...........................................................................I.............I....... 895,20 8.4 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT............................................. 83,2620 00 77.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE............... ............................... .....5 23,400.58 " 2215 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 13,560.0 455.0 52010 195.0 845.0 PER CENT 100.0 29.2 33.3 12.5 54.2 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 15 4 4 2 9 PER CENT 100.0 2617 26.7 13.3 6010 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 14 4 4 1 9 PER CENT 100.0 28.6 28.6 711 64.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 8 4 4 -0- 4 PER CENT 100.0 5010 50.0 -0- 5010 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 6 -0- -0" 1 5 PER CENT 100.0 --0- -0- 16.7 83.3 �-(,'ouncil approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net Issessments to $7,972.00 and increase the City's cost to tu2,690.58. ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 10 of 15 PINSON STREET BURGER TO STALCUP Unit 9 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 10,254.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 19 025047 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 119 280,22- 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 77500 59.3 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 533.0 40.7 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................19308.0 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 4,549.25 400 3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 39128.71 2707 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 79677096 68.0 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 364.25 3.2 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 79313,71 64.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 39966.51 35.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,308.0 320.0 195.0 136.6 976.4 PER CENT 100.0 24.5 14.9 10.4 74.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 13 5 2 1 10 PER CENT 100.0 38.5 15.4 7.7 76.9 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 5 2 1 10 PER CENT 100.0 38.5 15.4 7.7 76.9 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 2 2 -0.. 2 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 -0- 60.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 9 3 -0- 1 8 PER CENT 100.0 33.3 -0- 1101 88.9 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 11 of 15 LENA STREET COTTEY TO FITZHUGH PER Unit 10 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 115 385*50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1,138.55 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$12,524.05 1000 0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19700.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. _0_ TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19700.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 9 9 9790 00 79.7 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -0- GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED.....................................................................................:....$ 99979.00 79.7 LESS CREDITS GRANTED...................................................I.................... 799.00 6.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 99180.00 73.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 39344.05 26.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19700.0 750.0 450.0 225.0 1�025.0 PER CENT 100.0 44.1 26.5 13.2 60.3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 20 9 5 3 12 PER CENT 100.0 45.0 25.0 15.0 60.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 19 9 5 3 11 PER CENT 100.0 47.4 26.3 15.8 57.9 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 9 7 4 v0e 5 PER CENT 100.0 77.8 44.4 -0- 55.6 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 2 1 3 6 PER CENT 100.0 20.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 12 of 15, FITZHUGH STREET LANGSTON TO VILLAGE CREEK ROAD PER Unit 11 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 15,282.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1528.28 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 160811.03 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 2,287.6 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0® 0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 29 287e 6 i00.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$13,428.22 79.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 139428.22 79.9 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 19171030 7e 0 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 129256.92 72.9 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE...... ...................I..........$ 49554.11 27.1 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 2v287.6 987.4 800.0 250. 0 11237.6 PER CENT 100.0 43.2 35.0 10.9 54.1 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 38 16 13 4. 21 PER CENT .100.0 42.1 34.2 10.5 55.:3 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 36 15 13 3 20 PER CENT 100.0 41.7 36.1 8.3 55.6 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 21 12 10 2 9 PER CENT 100.0 57.1 47.6 9.5 42.9 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 15 33 1 11 PER CENT 100.0 20.0 20.0 6.7 73.3 ATT'ACHT ENT "B" PAGE 13 of 15 FITZHUGH STREET VILLAGE CREED ROAD TO WALKER (WEST) Unit 12 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 1.1,196.50 ENGINEERING ........ .............................................................................................. 19119.65 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 129316.15 1.00.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 19476.7 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE,............................. --0- _0, TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19476.7 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 89668.23 70,4• COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0_ GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 8p668,0'23 70.4 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 29320.25 18.9 'E TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................... 6 q 3470 98 51.5 :r NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................... ......................s5,968.17 48.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19476.7 400.0 150.0 636.7 690.0 PER CENT 1.00.0 27.1. 10.2. 43.1 46.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 19 8 3 4 12 PER CENT 100.0 42.1 .15.8 21.1 63.1 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 17 8 3 3 11 PER CENT 100.0 47.1, 17. 7 1.7.7 64.6 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 7 3 2 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 42o9 28.6 28.6 42.8 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 5 1 1 8 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 Council approval of the recor.,rnended reductions in assessments ivill reduce the Net Asses_�-:ments to $6,057.98 and. increase the City's cost to 56y258.17. ATTACHMENT 00B99 PARE",14 Of 15 FITZHUGH STREET WALKER TO DILLARD Unit 13 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 13 n 327 0 75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1,332077 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 14,660.5 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,633.32 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. ®Om -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 19-633032 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 9,587.58 6504 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... m0o 00- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 9,587.58 6504 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1,472036 10<0 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 8,9115.22'* 55.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 6,545.30* 44.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,633.32 995.0- 190.0 759.0 684.32 PER CENT 10®0 0 60.9 11.6 46.5 41.9 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 26 16 2 12 12. PER CENT 100.0 61.5 7.7 46a2 46.1 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 16 6 2 4 10 PER CENT 10000 5000 12.5 2500 6205 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 6 3 2 -0= fig. PER CENT 100.0 50.0 33.3 m0m 66.7 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 5 =0- 4 6 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 ®Om 40.0 60.0 *Council approval of the recommended reductions in assessments will reduce the Net assessment to 89,075.22 and increase the City's cost to 86,595.30. ATTACHh ENT "B" PAGE 15 of 15 VINCENNES STREET WILLIE STREET TO N. LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 12 PER Unit 14 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................a 69126.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 612.65 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST........................................................................... .....................................a 69,739.15 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 744,0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0- -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 74400 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 49 367.28 6408 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................a 4,367.28 64.8 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 19548048 2300 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 2,818080 4108 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......................................................... .............................................$39,920.35 58e2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 744.0 189.0 63.0 415.'o 266.0 PER CENT 100.0 2504 8.5 55.8 35.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 7.0 3- 1 5 4 PER CENT 100.0 30.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 10 3 1 5 4 PER CENT 100.0 30.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 3 1 -0- 3 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 25.0 --0- 75.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 6 -0- -0- 5 1 PER CENT 10000 -0- -0- 83.3 16.7 1.00 N \O dv O 2v � N) pP) CD ® 0ILJ 0 _ o CC!1-1 ::s OZ � 1.0 CDCo to n ril Cca Fj NCD rn Cf) ® — O cy, O c O L= 'rJ� C� ;S' n O F' O N Q O O O O C7 O C-) NUtz °� �C M m {3T Cf) m Ua 4� O O �" to Ua m m Cta H Ua Cl7"ti '� r1 ® H y 2 9H y0 CD o 11 CDD euro cra N � cam+ (DD ¢� � TCDD 1.40 H CD (D � � P)CD � � Cii U) W o ¢ cD O � � O 17 e CO) SON O T�+ RAJ O oll 01 O _�` O �a � ®s CN S O Tv O 8v o O kD O F-h O CD rn cfa �a �a Cr, O 4-- O IQ O oll •O`p � O Z ca co COL M co COL 00. OOL ® � o-•a CA � 00 d O 04 N M - col p ca C 04 N) ® N C O O O O O O O O b b b b SIGNED PETITION m 02 � c � n � Q O m o z Cl) *0 z� z, cnH - -,o to O cn H n � �r to a to w � n w � La tZ�' A tv rn� -n z C � � " � " 0 N) 0 ww to sn0 v� � M o ,zz tr1 11 0 1i O )1 q 11 � a-3 p O �,. w Ca ca m m cu P- rn m aca z ® O n m (D + m � CD eO+ cc i- m ® _ 0 w z r r r a o ` � Z mc m ¢n o a SA O < z O az t to tz t tz ZONE .0 t.--i co tS1 Aa C)0° r O. o �, °, O H m 'o m QD 7C ® �- V U] Cl: UJ m ca co ro r2 yz ua ria �l rn v m �+ v W 1- r�ra O z Z rn m m "n w m M o o co t1i ON0 mz o —I o mOND D D H W N 0 o m 0 o w oo oz N a N O< o o a< ,, vm Z to � HOCA i o CAm v m N Oa m O O O O O O C M (A -4 m v SIGNED PETITION w m � m a4 c --0 m D -p� 0 G) O oo n z o v o (nn m --i -� m n M -� z v o z cn � O < m W y wJ C iv ca ^x Cly W trJ C� in td ON tC kv td P) w W p N 'y p CD �O w 'O 'rl > a 010 NQS rvw Ott P ::s .10 NN 00 NO � O� � H C:] 93 CSD 01 cc++ � � � °� °=J �°- O & -' OXY, 01 ii W(� 0 C-4 M Y O N C/j t-�m w CD 0 ' F' Q, 0 c-_ua 'd �(y m Z C) cnco C) Nm °� N P~ � C+ e 0 o1-3 D D 11 m m CD �d oa w t m 0 0 R fi � m .0 3 z M z z ti p(�D � cam+ o e cn N• W co C--tj• N 11 N• (D y D " 1 x C 0 w 0 �l x t j 0 w c+ %+ � � FJ 0 co e+ 0 z, u) F'^ CD :j l S w C+ :z H O c+ (D cn CD W O �i c+ (D x ¢ co 000 F'• C+ O wFj z O (� CD CD 04 C� 11 � � � � � rn � Qil m P) (DC-F H CD C+ O v (+ O J } � z m -o m N U_ C CO) O z e� O � 't7 �' td w td ZONE Fd 0 t� t' n tlz rz txj 1:2 `i- o C+ -°r e � . e 0 cuw o ON o o iv r ci- o p O t� °� O O °a ° 0 fi Cj� o 0 v rn CF m v m { cr- x v J J cil J , LID J 0Fj W Ud UJ U] C12 Cf) CA ED CA M (D CD CD CD CD (D CD CD CD (D -1 0 0 Z Z In In rnM rn o n o o °n oQL v, m0 CD rn O Z m COL 0 ma Q 00 m m z H ►i 0 tv vi tv W (T O* W iv W (A 3 O .o rn .o ry rn N m 00 N c N N Z N N O O `n p O m -I O 'r1 tv N v, W tv tv CO 3 � o rWv o a m _ mcnc e e ° ° y Z O CT O O O O O O O O N —I SIGNED PETITION 0 rn m rn m c .v F -4 m -1 O z D M m 0 O O v, D Z o p � -4 rn .04 m a z v *p c rn rn < 'tioil aa NN 00 N O v: H o -• o N CD 5rn m D n P. cn er M U O -0 m O9G HH a m OzCQ Ct, o �o z m (D b m N o a 7D co) w O H O tz tz tz ZONE ° 0 0 ° w �a G Oa. o �. 0 � M "') m O a m � v a �d 0 � m H m rn 0 -I La "� O O Z � w Z b w W. m i 0- CCL O m � C m z _ D a H N3 � o 0 a,\ m -z m 00 N C= U) co z(D cy' m a o C.) 70 CD w m -4rno o ry v M V) ° M Cl) z 0 0 o N a H SIGNED PETITION O N F H M D m -7o Q O -0 ' vim, D z . O z H N u) n 4 4 m o m D A H m 0 O cnz C CN n` O m N) r v, x byxx 'nmaa co ym rvw 0 0 xcn -i FQ 00m � mrn O m can UOi It m �e D C7OCn x m 0 c' b my 3 H0 mm 5C w m <+ z z °x 00 U� En � 0" � � m O C) m O0 r C (D W U) m i O O C- m * m c Z m 0 b mN H m N C-3 o w rC to ZONE 11 U cr, Il w c C � A� Q+ pF O Cr m 0101 o a Cu -0 :0 C+ m • v � x v o b umi w m It (D co Lo _ N m co m � V) v --I Ch 'i o H ® � O c+ N M 't1 n m N ry tv zv m O 0 :0 0 0 0 Om C -� m H 01, IJ -' D y H rn rn rn N 3 o OO -9-- W W W W (mn C (A • s o • • u U) Z U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -n m cn > mv o � ''' imp oa iv ry tv to MM N Z 0of 0 0 0 0 N a � SIGNED PETITION. m z 0 oc m a v 7 � m iv O O O 0cq D —1 O 2 m a m �v Iv Z v 0 O O *z N O C m � D" 00 00 ao m (n M e'� Pte-° . �'° �'° �°o y •-i s vat ca va En 1-4mrt rt rt z BOO C7 �-- � � 0ma. m TD m v D-3 11 e-e a-p 0 p Z m o v N a H z ztv c� ZONE Olt N � m Lo N � 0 � �o - O z 2 mm NJ m m ® Ln ® Ln ® mz o � M CIO co 00 00 00 co coO � n� c m 1-4 c� 110 w Low (A a con rn ZNcc co �. 0 0 tin macnnn co aer nz iv ns n4 m N 3 rn ® ® ® ® ® ® ® � 70NZ N 0 —1 SIGNED PETITION m m m � ® a F. M - m -n o z G) o z a cs 4 m 0 n -4 M C� z 0 (nz CA *o c m ® �' T- ® N a8 b 'a1 a a rt7 X U) .JJ rA O v; H TD l(A m Pa F^a 71 z z � z m wD Z 9 ?JOC) W Z p � r °Q Z m ® -o m NH < tv ZONE , Q 0 O IS r4 CD N � CA D _� � 2 m M o ® ® m0 co co co 0 M � m c� GA ; m 00zw 0 o ® ® CP M4 0 O �n C') nND i� m -4m ® ® tIJ 0 rn u) � N u ® ® ® N vm � SIGNED PETITI®N ® -^ m r -4 m O z D m o m n m � D z v ® *0 c �o e m 00 ¢ rn o O � N ® o m m > o x m oUeo w n HR Ha z � omID c�a ° oJ cam* ® o � on cI co ::� CD c-F ® uv (D �rj C-) COD 0C z rn �O v m 0 > 0 M CA ;p H z lu G) O tz ZONE �5, ar"rt HU� �a m O °til N 0 cr, Q Q O R°- 0FtFt �� o a (D N o m H x ® r ( nI-S CD CD ~3 rnCD N m co o (D 0 ® H ca ® z -n -n N CN1 yr N N N r O O O O O Z O ° 0 M ® � r Na W W O (a C ® O (A z V2 (D O O Q. O Q rn O cn pigDq/ rn w N O N N ® M UH M CoV/ z O O O O O O N ® H SIGNED PETITION o m -� cn D m -n o W N G) w z e, o O z 0 cp m o m �. N z o cn 0 0 0 0* 0 0 < na L T', u� zcn IA4 0 0 00 � ® 0 CD C1 ra 1111 3N91S 0 (A w 08 6 0ON ON .0 z �� c� � rr6a a� � i�61 KOH nsn ® J co X aC & x® 1-o —a E 9 w co 00 00 00 0 ou CL 0 �. all �a e4 �a i In 00 ou CL AN La 44 -It ' r � ii .mow 00 o � a 0 0 53, � > en � � ® PIS be f) w 44 epi °-4 „i &� eat 44 -4 ," a-mo i &P9 w V- 7-4 - ® 7—d -4 4*4 °uq ® go 0 " 0 e-4 I kn $4 @9 9d to °A oO w ® kD a® 4 ca z �-)F- Ix 41 0 LL. cn 9- z 6� LA- 4 �. O U 11 NIS _ NO w ON 00 W CD cn � f ® 0 w 0 00 00 00 can art c �+ ,. (� an Cn c� to ON 00 00 Cr% � � � rr�d raN emt ami r-`a epi' CL I 44 44 "o,( ° p, r � �' � �� � � • dam 0 0 Cc LJ 0- ®b sk 44 x co R -A8® V aha g ® H FU) xQ® e4 � eq 4100 W -4 cit) wC) Cdr M $4 E. v9 cz u�j in in in } > O U) Z 3 X: xr' o e e Q U wo V W f- ILS. N �I N N Z (. 0 o LL w Q z O J r� L1. W \l O C LLm N011113d MOIS a w w P. p 0 z FN- O O O to � VIA 0 O � O rI rI U'\ . . N l~L W O o rn m cue toCrl rYl w Q U) w to 0 c cn z w � to to 00U) M `N . o � U-\ n to -�' Q W p to m to r\ z �' � � O O O c t O U. z as ar w 0 0 a) a) rn Of)Q V M co W rte' � • co r4 r-i • W Q 0. o a) ¢ O • 4-10 r o � cr. 4-q 4-1 02 taa O oao Q O X41 4 g en o0 0 0 0 z Him �, `� __e"a . o o . +, N a � w �� � � aroma � a ria w 3 N 0 Z ary, as ua z H Qto cr_ -F� ri9 r-I ¢ ~ ® N w � u� � d a + ay n. z :' +� rl N r 1 a Cm r P.0 Ld (Da5 o p c� • rd ri a) J Q f,4 d e> e> cd cd v5 ri �, 0 f. a> m rrs •rt ha 0 H o q cd ,.� o �a S.s +3 �-a �+ a) S i (moi rri z w 0 0 : m as : o �40 w0 -Ci 0 rj s cz Q M a a V M •rl +9 E-i 'd m 0 m r m c3 m 0 o w w� 2 n- 0 � 5 0 a) 0 co a5 ,-i +-" 00 +� �zD d ue � 3 4-1 co 'd O x U) () a C: rl 5 cit � C14 F 4 9.1 r-I C. S ri o ,-1 P 0 4-9 clt cd O Z U. cd ,-i cd r-I 0 0 N a) 0 0 r-A a> H a3 H a> r-I H � O O ri =C ve irN Csa Cr9 c! 0 H x 0 Ln x irN �a V% �l u\ AH Lo X o4 a a u, a Lw i acs to �C3 31 _4 oo CoW C3 p O 0 LL IN M cm t`7 0 co � 1113 1 o, a� 0 0 0 0 0 0 E ;A �_ 2 !> o C >A. �- g� do a � 0 0 � � CYN to CPIZ co �x� �- c� M cPi m m o 0 Cid Cil CSR to F�^B k^- t'a• aw to to CO Q7 to 0 o o ' �° bs eLo, tf! o- o ClLU o $ uw a ® r-I r9 co Ey CY Q5 A el9 r� C� 1:'' � tis e�➢ efl � �a .0 t A 110 �0 i s . o CL 0 � o r J Cq CNP 0 co X-C 0 o � l t:.>>, o 0 0 � a 3NOZ C 0 ury �< uw r� ,"';; uu 2z 0 ca U7co to a Xr a 1 uu u C cc U7 Y © o 2z m 0. r 0 a 0 E 8 m w � C 3 [id r-0 E� C ® y', LA Sq C Ua C9 � to� to � m . Ca rl co cc ® it I.- T H z 0 at 0 LLw a ®11.11 63NOIS IX ® ® ® ® ® M ® � ® H ® � � LL, w all P, m C14 rl O o ® an es �—A �R app og �n1 �4 �b o 0 S�1 Ct�L ) c�9 oma@ Gni (n 6v'b F-+ H0 w (DO oo 00 00 Do 00 00 0 CL 0e U- in vi in �n fin in H ® cn Cc w 00LL ILI H 0 ® 44 4 44 CL ® 4 44 44 01qn PQ an 00 4 4 P� Ali O E4 2t z z �-O 4� w PA 3NOZ C� C� TS r� c CJ r O H O > Ha n, w O O ag65 � w m 9, c�4 CSO z � � RH dW W � a� �� ;kCCPw Pkpq � kn in cy Z(h +� r®t 0 cn ® Q O 0 W CL ~ CD o ti. 2 0 L D W r 11.113 63NDIS � C ® ® o U) � r- ® C w 00 0 F, ® o Cq W en � � 00 U) cis w w 00 00 00 00 w o I® � cn c cn � w eta U. U. A V —4 , 1 � 9.a C8 P4 �s IL 0. f � co M 2 u1 Q H Z 0 0 O 2 > ® ed ¢ �J `� a o a 0 44 �a aeaa � 0w x bo H H OIL u 0 w r 4 ,1 aw w¢ (�� ® Ria > A w A w u u �0 x:G G Q q� A IgA O �.,1 pgA od+g0 A opd�Wy ,yOA�p yCd L Prt $4 pq 4 p4gB � y.p �Ny9 ba/ ��{ 94 . 4 p,a ¢ W h W q�p �q b w u W hs ® Vtl q� 0 Biu iW e tl X00 �8 1! �1E ® �Wp �'e � Fa Md y44 may° �p 1e n p� ��4 M4q-0 ', 41 Po��i1 4�1 V��dg9p G°iP�� 0 -H ® 44 P® Q ¢ W 0. L '^0 Z 0o q 8 P., l b -1 tie �B P4 GV W 8 4 wd OQ0 ZVO Qq w to uu CL Z ® clems-I z 0 LL W W A A G1M Cox T) w U1 tz NO 11113 ci a P.: 63NDIS HCl FZ U) IX O O O ori O co 0 m O �I chO ire 'c0 ICO � c0 O O O LL W (Y) n m m cY1 t0 cl- m O V— LU ul u\ ick tit! u1 40 m U E-b CE oo 100 to 100 lco ico to 'co u\LL m Pm O U ua u,\ tic\ O �O �— n a0 N <Yi cYl cc uw U. LUL co ®5 @y tD O O C72 N d5 ® ri ri HEx � Y ® O O u� � O aw a. rq 3 m a` Q0 CI- O O O O q O O c0 ub O r U � [1 co H fly II —d O r-A (D N cd O N O P 4JI 4-9 + tt7 a d O U Ot 0 r,5 rt3 N H H �] ° O ct Czc O rye cLt O es ,� N a r-I -% O O U] z to ®0W 0- �g +y et9 ff5 @ c� �D U] 6 a-D cd �O LU LU Eco X. � E" �Q �a et3 �I.� © �� a` et] �c a.O w a) � m r—I 04 � X. U U et5 eh �+ a� cd r-I d O N W h ri Q) c t -p O P. (n Liu _ H O O Q r i C3® p O �" M h0— 0 � r-I 4` r f cd - O N cf-) O O u! �° cYl R3 P,� a3 O Gtr C1. C3 C� u\ u! 2, ud [� 1] cv Q Co tits > O O � �dEI ZU) t r-� f uj h® J IL 0 z 0 w 6t.t m Ix Ir N011 �C &1 I1 M ® O w 0LL cPl O ®• o 0 0 4rl crl �'- ® v0 E-+ d ICO to cc CL 0 ue u1 O o r O to W c CC w U. LL a� Cd z Eq H co els Q) �-4 rn er e� o C� O O O CL �r l W :, rr-'• . [a cc O (3 v9 U) a3 u i� 0 � ® O rt zCL CT� Oa W W j O -r-i +b-O 0 U. Q H � ON F- O C) � � � O co x C < LL� Q LO N ".I uw Ir O O co O to 41 n 1 UW to U0 p on on E 0. 0 CD to co LU LL. ar �e tcl N011 1,1 63NDIS 0 ® a o 0 0 0 0 � o 0 0 LU O C`) O ul tel O art 0 9® w O O O trl% Lel trd O s C tae O Lr\ (N CV CA!' O 00 LU 0 t w � O � O O "1 co er €� F-® CD CD 0 cc uw1 � O E�— LI- c— O 1, UL1 I @,9 CU Q,7 @� Q,➢ �) tU CU � � co rr) uuwi cl 219 Pf3 Pia Zf] PYy Fjy 09 � to to Q` r— Q9 E. loco co cc W 0 � ° 'A c� a 0-. Oto O cl, Lr,to CCN r-A °t{ 1 Q tR U-% cls CN plc tee r� 4-) 43 +'� +) rte tri --I tir s: n Do ra D D Do PA DO D cd Er � z R0 a) tl� Q7 CJ 2�y ® e y e9 Qy cd Q) -P u C5 Q) Cly 3 V-- ^U9 $a r i ro C.9 +a 9-y st E a 7-1 by Q) Qy +g ef3 CZO a3 =d °'C3 '10 ^�' to „baa lI] •ri `� +. ) �� r;� � EI3 �.✓ O J •-" o til q 5 w CS .I`8 RI sly Qy (U P-(� O 00 42 V w rd (D ® 0 �nl.QAC -µ"a1 n` Q) -P q Y4 w Qy 1--6 aH SCJ -r-1 0 4-3 4 Z �4+: 2: ed.3 w to (L) PLA N -q OO 0. # S ly C q w Qy a0 r E+ 4 U A +} O 5" r-i $-d r°i .C� (N-F S r-i cd tel C 7 S, O r O H + 4D O Cd O cd O cd r-A � CSS � 'd r� C5 H e�44 bj Cd rvcdS �c �d Cd Oq rcYds, bog �(D OM �^Q) OV >p�� �e.D ® O Q) 0110 �e—�I `��a wd � " 8 �-3-� r"i,� �'W !--mob f--4 �4 Do r-i �-�tl �`'Vt H `"0 t-i (n V '��6 l.d"� t�4 J 4 FH N 0 0 w a O r— O 1.— P. IL z CD C� w Ir Il 113d O 0 O O O O O O O OW to O O O a O O O O O O O � X0, O O Uv U-\0 ca O c� O --tO O O r LC\ -� C14 C uv N nt O C12 cvY cv C5 O O O G3 O tza u\ to to d� to to to CQ to to to to < CLLL 0 u\ L(\ 1r u\WE Lf\ L\ �n [Z T:�Z2 0 a M7- CD esj Q Q � 10 rj� j 0 ft3 _o O to Q Q �co 4-, r �tiRe CPI 0 O n. Q I-� LtV '1 u as Q Q f} Cd } d a O a.➢ •rY r-4. Q � Q Q rM r 4 y O O `: y cd a r9 Q Yu: += p Q Q Ldx cc tly Q➢ o E10 &" 1-- d Q UNC CL UD LTi Q CO (.d --c0 Q Cd `u „meg oo"'f Q r� Y"m Ul• W Q Q °i"'a p W �y F�y •rq pplyy /fM1. C�; p� c„'r' ley tt� Q (D 'Zp�`e' ^f"'1 �l 5�w r..� �wW.',�' Y�! r9 td b— ��. � O Ql7 C') C� t�`c U, tl4 CY't; Q C,r`q r—� tQ Q9 U➢ X dZ tai � 'cr r-0 ! C� y D Ej � ,E � rl O Ei co td '� r O� 4.L. Q ?, O C Y � 10 N C\' � > p N 2ch � c� 0 �- W O w z� ® 0 CD c�2 0 LL z 0 li w � UN cr J N w 0 011013d 3 OIS w 1- h o0 00 WM CA w o m Q w to a` 0 � o ON z � cid o\ z U) � H 0 cn CNto z o 0 66®e q U- 0^' O*- ^ Ld `4 H z 13 0 _ m � ami � ® z� a c U) r13 c� 9C �o > lc0 a crCL0 cr- CL a) . Q) +3 Cd 'n 3 ' Z cr �z+ p � D- 0 w Z co ag O o a Q a cUo o W �D ® •d ® < cx rd (D D tLo ww - Cd z w o CL U Ui [Vil Q la- F¢ W OO O �o O O O to n tri \ D cr- uj IL z Cy K 0 U. w R O O O (n 0 cc '1 I1. d 63NOIS P P, 0. Pi* n, P, ZZ CD O O O O O O O O �- 0 ev epi est cit c�1 m ev cv cit Q O O O O O \0O O O UN Lr\ sty Lr\ Lr\ u1 XrNz CD erg cn H ra rA m t0 to m tp t® ico 100 tp LLu r rl u� u1 u1 tr! u1 u� c z � o O O o O lco O O O u� �n ui u, L .O u, u, icy CH O U- U b.0 � � w a; w a: a Cd t a �Cd � c co a ® r-� r—i r r - a r bO b® aO bO bo bO bO Q o 00 o 00 0 0 0 0 ui a. o r� +» rr� en bOi fir; ASO �o a Oe d n N ewe "0 CD �5 rO9 ® O U cr CL .Wyk N 0 CV O �WL-- 4-9 C3 s n U Q oz w r 9 O <d r I F ry r-i E--1 O tri a) P+i O 4� x = -1 +3 9. 0 bo rl bo r-I bO r-I bo b0 tz(l h bD O w CL O to H O ✓ s: rlC W W :�. Z ($e q FT-e .� by cd E--, -i a) r� N �`�' N � N oa N N m N C7 o Q, Ow -3 -H °ri g� Ell •r-I O °ri O •rA 'd •ri H U7 W to -P +, 10 ID t¢-< �' o o en U) N co d � d to e� LXN � o � o � � •r`-i nI- (n o d O ,^j r o a) (t O C\2 -HO •ra O r—I — r> 0 51 c- -d a) 0 m to �q m �-, to z4 to (1) ICO W — �>q �e �- �6 Om c,, O O ON O ca L, 0 Ln Lf) 0. r: ® LL 7 0 U- Asa 0. O O O O O w U- O 111134 3 OIS I— o o 0 a 0o o 0 ® O `® 8 O O d ® w m FO O 'T O O O O O O z? td, r r- r r- r- d r E-- U) Gq N 7 N N N C? co N N O F O O CO O O O O J O O LO M LID Lo O C 3 u7 LO ® e m m m m ® w m m m ® 00C'? I-- Cl) C? m r~ r- Cl) co c- O O C� C)" 00 O ON ON N N It N N N Ln N N F co CD CO co to C0 CJ e m m LL. LO LO DC7 t(-) S} 7 Ln u') ;C) F v' O O C,* O O O O O O Lo 5 6 S b 6 C c5 m of Cl, f1 R4 C1 f3a p G C1 P� us cn u'i u) n n to r <n t6 to ro co m ri5 rt5 co co rif ® 3 CD O O o O O o o O O O -� %Uca cc ui CL ;- -sw O CL gra �s 0 CO N 00 c ®1 a N N ®i m N (Y) r ��ctt 0 Lr ;': 3NOZ m P 1 m M4 7 M. m ® � ra aCJ O C D � 0) N 29 C[> w f N N N H r7 -N vrI C H O eu O 0 io ON _u U5 =r3 ��' J1 ,�-�U:3 �= -E f-I _` Cl, TS 's w N N ci rS £a i co f O -! O Y co .i, O C~ (3 ® L, < O a o C) r ui O cn cl� Q °^'�"� O et5 *.�-E co � N >H US -H Cw. era C- W u; -0 wLLj Cw '4s r rl5 2 `!-' O f-I W P. (2-1 ;6 GL) O -41 - N Lu Q ._a ,} N Q3 4) U7 CJ C1? (fj UD f-t r"i j 4-' -A 75 LO a -0 O `0 O €� 1-4 U cGn W U. off CO (C 0 er O co � N C` Q; �O O :_O o � O Q o 1r) F U) x cz 039 C) 'D 0 O O 0 Z co Ln Ln ® z Q w 0 W LL c0 O CL z r ® U 0 U. cc 4 U. O m O w Ln ) 11113d 63NOIS fD. N N O O O O O 0 0 O O o cnw W w w O O O O O O O O O ,-i 2 N IL crC- d- I- fl- < (D 0 N N LO N N N M N N W O Z co~ O O O O O O O O O N In O Ln Ln !_C} C'') Ln LCA? ® ® ) o e ) o o e Cr coO ON O a ON ON CT ( 011 O\ N N LO N N N d N N z OL) a CO OJ CO rO 03 CJ CL 06 0 D ® M1 LL Lr) Ln 10 LO L') LO Ln Lf) C) 00 O O O O O O O O O LO T) O Ln LO LO co Ln L') v ' 2�4 -S� ('Si c3 crS r�5 tcS c6 ri3 � r6 Pa L]a Q� f1 P< (3a 6 6 ro 6 6 t5 3 sf �3 O o O O o O O 0 O citO cl g g r- O q �r w 3. Cb CID cr cy w Ir a. 0CJ ~ LO ON 0 00a l ' J CY)) e6 CY) Cl) N C1J d (Y) 1-4 ra ,4�e t"tiJ 0 n; ul '-9 w -o is -3 0 ® 4) cu O e 4-) 4--) u° Fi Uacn 0 U) 0 C: U) U) 0", --t '-J (a) ( Cp O '-) eu :3 O €i a O zw w 7 Ca --Cb m E 0 .Cb F-i =,-a Q) .� Q -4-) a a + eC )a c) 4-3 �3 +a ® 0 .gyp O �,�� r6 `-50 O z z 'S f{ O ,9 G La Q ---i f a t!1 Ua S tf7 �i C13 w UA t co O `.4 Q Q r- --a 4- t O +s U. " Cv L') �a) N 4J ? ti ON -i d (PI U a N +3 Cv -,A O ' N >,N m O -i O N 'I-, N O Lt N O J i O'+ i C. '� .L* Co N :7 co W :Eh O d' C =--t d` N (j) It CO 't E- d HCI000 > (D O L\ LU 0 LUO Cwt zE 0it\ 00 ® U- U. O 0 I11 a3NOIS P 8 O O 0 O 0 O O O r2Z (a M tow (D� LBB A> CO'- Q o --t (i Rl C\1 r\ C\l O w 0 O O y® C� OOH vo o`er o� to ON ox 2 CD to N LC\ c\t Lf'\ - n ga_ bCl t� 100 100 to to to W CL 0 O O Z 0 L 0 dos a 0 O V\ U. U. 21 d cd cd cu cd cd cif cd PP, P, P4cc P P P Pi �j r2 cs e� 3 erg �t3 � H � H r-ii 1-4 r-i-I ® 'W � to 4 to � � o o 0 �o �o ca® ON a �. 4 't5 r, a. wJ 64) 7;r a O CV tt\ - 1 L W s=? ` CV 2a tJ �_ > -\ Q U) cicQ Oa 011�+ 0 ,. er" Id ,-14 , 9 U) E-s 77cd Ix z z N o N s N w N N w N 'N a N W W cd a 4L 4Z, .3 Sq .: +-D X) co �lq H rq � o,- � o`° c� -0 � +a � � (rn acv r I�v r� l -0 0 5� 00 r f O ff� Cl8 _0 O -H O 'r-Y P O r-A C\l r-I C\l r-j xx r8 .O cd CN m 0T o) CO S: ico -"Co r o� O� i`r' �➢ r'= � -�' � -� ��' --� .rte � � � �' �' �` ,S'� �=° r� Ix w (Y) F- C\lH ® O ca o z 0 L cicco0 rz Il I1d JI Z °— o � w cot o ou � e H cnH m U- I— aee �co cit to \0 cn cn �a cd _ cl� 0 H es �` H m cd Q ® �' O y s CV 0.�9 Q 0 Z ?� c O � � O " 0 �' z O ^� u. as C'— en � ® H ® a CUO 9 H H M W W0to . eo N H e) 4.3 t () H (n txl H � H u) a Lc, R 03: CQ O O O 0 0. ® w ® <� ® U. C7 NO u� II 113a � p p py O O IM O O O O O O O w Ix 1-® O O <"� � 't0 O O O O O o LL C's C\l •.0 c�a cv c t nt Cv CV i® uj O O O`• O O O O Z (aLr C 1 v7 u LCA LCA ® C l Ch O 0� 1,0 CY\ O C CO t'V CV C\$ N cv N C\8 C1T C\l z to W i0D 'co tO tb to 100 &3 CL 0 U. LL a Lt"a LA Ld 1 O O 7 C\X O O O O O u � to L Lr LCA L(1 C �H � -114 ci �-4 c�t3 c�ti Cd CJ '' ct; w t00. Ix R. iSd ts�' r3) IL O O O cy-, O Q) Cil ry yl i1 O� � C to u O ry 0 ) O a0 � d e-� �—y c a n-�� ,..� r-i ,. �� tap ed t�t0 t-5 �ttpD z z r Z CSS tRY H Cd cd TK O cd N 4LJ W;rVf 1-1 N +s CU N �+, N 0 E-a cd cd e i e -IP O (� •rtl '_� rz' ^ri rf5 >ri -H =r-� ` •ri cd •ri W r'7 J w cd 5 d c1] :d r-1 00 O s' (`r% r0 cd Ls� cd Ls-\ "C O r-I EU Ma h (n el� w O ;. O cd O �t O ': O r a 4 O a 0 O i-1 etj O sa (Do 0 C? O C F� O ct O m cd OHO it O r CP'0 � UN (� Lr® t� `� Lr% � U-11j �l C� � cq } > cr co 03: Ln zcnO O z W OV W H t^ W N w p z Co � aO CL z Q ,1 04 4+, O O p LL Q z O W LUCL m �. J N O n® Le) Wt W LL N011113d 03NJIS 1— W N O' ® ��y ® ® ® ® O O O O00 2 F— ® 'O O O O > eat O ON � 0 W W Q 0% o W U. W .t eat U� h� 1 alt O� 8® aTn N W � � � set 10 a+t Q N a w 0 ¢�1 N z N cn alt all O YO Ln in RV a o a rpt O a 9 C* s+t ®6 � O O W ON -4 B® 00 a% Ot aO VA c Cl) Cit a0 N CV 00 Cil cn cV C14 %0 w F„ Q Q ri oO H QW O 00 co co 000 00 00 000 Q r O. W a in al1 ae� ae� ark o� zH 00 00 00 O W4� � W LL LL z z 0 -H 0 m A m N � co 00 Nt co � p � 0 h 0. W o .4 CL ff ¢ 044 W ® co &d CL q5 J O1 cn aO 00 rq C14 � N H 3NOZ a 90 r� 00 o o � H o(n U) cc41 ^ ~„4 N w °d a o o w z a 0 cr. 3 O p O $a O ® oq ®D a o C Q a o z ,�.�' ce V a . a�CO w 40 u ® z cr. w 10 stir bo bo bo w h F O W 0- E-a, u �, N a • '� Lr5 04 1-4 W W •� Q w-i w a w-I w ®9 a}l �e9 �j az9 �. ^ri {�` 4m °J * $A � U, F' Q a eA $� A $a a•� �: Bse sd &sae atit Rr K'e d a-a U V7 W z W "4 04 A O H W O O oA al � -tcf1 v q all F-t alt y-4 m O bo cn " e=•9 a-1 $a O 40 &B tV e q N -4 cV r4 0 %0 n=•4 N .14 r4 l- cnax Z � � 00 D o fq � 3 � �C -.4 a0 $40 U03 �t waft � o o O o o Cid0 100 � et ® e- ® U. w 4 c CcCc c k 11.11.3 ,;. I$ w a CV to 0 0 0 0 0 (a w ® o � � � on cit Cit �o to o Cr an o o 0 U) COY u o fi0 N 0 COP u v e ON LPI a00 � z cr to to 100 to U. c�a t lco r 3 O c�Y o u LL LL �t C -- z rt �-�f rry ���at-yq� €? �-La F a) a) ¢j ¢� r-4 W N,1 ® � off Ix 4 PVA etit COY nY ® cr -- ° w ,) a4 YCL 0 �- 0 0 � o 0 �O u 3NOZ as M aO �__ U) 0: c� $,o° U) LAJ W ® oqa .—a -F ® z ull N ° off. fTa (ll YJl Yt3 O 3 c� O :Z� `tea r Y a➢ ¢i N ¢3 Oz 4-:0 O -IJ 0 O 'd rra tto tu7 �c� tat? co 40 rta 5 eta tz0 era tto eta 2t0 00- O cd G Via., -C: Qy N cd cd cd rI Z 2 M r� � �-e Sy � N � N N � .{3 '�' � m' U W cd (ia ( +s ss 4-3 w 43 � S C t: CJ cd � &qH � � CYC � cd w cd � cd `,9 cdLL. Ua Q O OCA S O Cd0 coo H n 4D 0C— 4-'� OCA OC— X x eta\ 00 cd eta--- u5---— n L (aa U 'D >r CD UN, (D zn .3 LL! Q M C=l U n ►1<9 > cr. gr w 03: (to Z C% Z M ttt; I Q Q W O U W ~ ►� U. N O exp O ~ Z torn LM torn Ln -4 Z QLrl N O cm ern Z ul cr.0 W Q U4 41w u to cr- Cd O „ ►� W � 91 91 N 011113 d 04 �, a, 04 r. (ANSIS c `® W tOJ O O © p G ZN � F— 'T =O W H O O 0 0 o O .moi C c i cri o -1 2 (n U. cr N N N N� N t/1 ,tn (14 N Bet w v 0 0 N z N Ln Ln O O o tkn Ln N aNo (n =) N c+1 cyy 9 00 all Ull Ln cr 7N N N N N N N N • (D Q Q W cr. n ar QW O 00 co 00 00 00 co no 00 A. cr d 0 r, to u) Ln ori u-a en to Z O Wit Ln Ln vOi Ln N-t tr W LL W era �--- O Z r.4 Q 0 s a � Lid a Ln Ln c O W O O y0 LL 44 i:t3 OJ d 44 — O Ln O r•, �t 00 C14 cn CIJ W 0o Y--t v 3 N O Z Ct F A d FU CL8 po 00 04 In �e.F .arj dpi > . to ¢ r-, a) w as G:; O c �a cL 3 �,. DA a u s4 �+ A U4 r V pry N Q [-s �+ E-t a� C-+ �+ H �+ F-+ p E-+ 'P 3 3 ?C U7 tfd a! va d raa 0) to a1 cn ep qa 01 O O ► .., r. Z ar O 14 v O Q► (, N at 0 a7 O a) O W 1a O 4-1 O u O O 41 O dJ O b0 P, H Ztra bei m by eP b9 m OD ua Q A. [:7 by P-4 W w P4 W 00 04 fsl 60 f w bQ 0. w bo O F H i a isCLtried etl ? . M 0 z Z Q 0: 04 Gw' 0.r P; 1y. 0. 00 w � tJ 1 W i.; n z^ " A x " ) Q U) er 04 A tra G+ Q va 94 � m94 M w ISG i= 14 x+ ^� Z U U) W W tU w CD w ev nj 14 ev) $4 e+� Q W h O &t O r- 43 O r• 41 O a•. 41 O f` O t` 4.0 O !4 ef) F+ n Q m -4 m -q m F-4 m ma t6 .-+ ttl ra h� to [C w saU tJ tY9 um f u rri �sd U cn G lJ m r4 u en to '�S,' (n ¢ ¢ wo, ' W t� 0 00 U) Z 3 � a Q ~ U W H W N N Z a% d Z Q O U 2 O ix Q LU C7 J a N O W W m N011113d 03NJIS Z W ®. O W W p ® n ® to t~i W I& Lun, P- %0 w Q Q Q U D O O i— W ON ® NF til ® 0 ® ® 00 en Nz N w 00 T-6N = ° ° ° o � ON UP) V) � V; 20 O N UJ f" O co ON as 00 00 �� V) CM cq H U Q Q ae o--1 z W cr.LU 00 00 w 00 co 00 C W 4— Z W � W tn L t 4. U- NO c�a C4 �¢ z Z o °� o f- A ° O v c W n� 8 Y coF cr a en ® DN -74 Q 0 44 5 Ix a� - ® � o 44 17-4� s ® an �4 ® � Ta *a Cq RQ lel j • <.`04 4 44 401 4 � 0 C -i1 ;A 3N0a 1 C-D n, rff� 0 W Z 3 *P O -24AQ bo a CIO ;s m %0 tea0 9l a.n 1* �a cn W ei �1 �a ,o 0 0® -