HomeMy WebLinkAboutCP 31 t
(BM W Hmulnmo maumm
ti
' POLICY PROPOSAL
DATE FILE NUMBER SUBJECT Municipal Court Night PAGE_OF_
5/24/77 CP-31 Operations
PROPOSAL PROPOSED BY: Councilman CITY NAGER'S REVXVJ
Richard C. Newkirk &--4i
To more adequately meet the needs of the citizens it is proposed that a night court
be established. Chief Judge Ferchill has described the need and advantage of such
a court as he sees them in the following information:
Benefits of Night Court
I. Benefits to the Police Department
A. Magistrate would be available to warn subjects arrested after 5:00 P.M.
B. Arrest warrants and search warrants could be issued until 10:30 P.M.
C. * Overtime payments fop court appearances of second-shift officers would
be eliminated.
D. Effectiveness of• Team Policing would be improved.
(1) Second-shift officers could take their prisoners before magistrate
instAad of relying on day shift.
'(2)• Day officers would be relieved of securing warnings for subjects
arrested by the second shift. '
0-1
(3)" Second-shift officers would be able to question suspects when the
case is freshest.
(4) Second-shift officers would be able to take statements and file
charges earlier.
E. Speedier trials would allow better recall of details surrounding issuance
of traffic citations.
F. Potential reduction in overtime paid to police officers.
II. Benefits to the Public
A. Innocent party could be released earlier due to earlier questioning.
LEGALITY
OPI FISCAL NOTE [
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS
POLICY PROPOSAL (cont'd) PAGE OF
B. Persons apprehended on traffic warrants after 3:,60 P,M. would not have to
wait until 9:00 A.M. to eater their pleas.
C. Some citizens would be able to have their trials at night after work.
D. Citizens would receive a speedier trial.
E. "Quality of justice would be improved.
III. Benefits to the Court
A. Quality of justice would be improved.
B. Backlog would be substantially decreased.
C. Trials could be given 30 days after requested.
D. Cases would be fresher at Municipal level and consequently fresher on
appeal.
E. Jail docket would be evenly apportioned.
F. Preparation for Court of Record.
Possible Court Hours for Municipal Court No. 3
2:30 P.M. On Duty
3:00 P.M. (10 cases)
4:00 P.M. (10 cases)
5:30 P.M. (10 cases)
6:30_ P.M. (10 cases)
7:30 P.M. (15-20 cases)
9:00 P.M. Jail Docket
10:30 P.M. Off Duty
Need for Night Court
Whenever a subject is arrested after 5:00 P.M., he presently cannot be delivered to
a magistrate to be warned of his constitutional rights until 8:30 A.M. the next morning.
Since the arresting officer cannot interrogate or question a subject until after the
subject has been warned, those who are arrested after normal business hours must
simply be put in "cold storage" until the following day.
This lack of a night magistrate creates a burden on law enforcement personnel as well
as our citizens. In the first instance, the arresting officer who is on a night shift
cannot carry through with his investigation, complete his reports, and file charges
while the case is at its freshest stage. In the second instance, a citizen who might
be able to clear himself and be sent on his way all in the same evening cannot do so
because, under the law, he cannot be questioned by the police until he has first been
warned of his rights by a magistrate.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
POLICY PROPOSAL tont'd PAGE !-OF 4
Several day officers have told the ju4ge that the added responsibility of getting
the night shift's prisoners warned has increased their workload thereby reducing
their efficiency. Likewise, some of the night officers have stated that they are
unhappy because they have to rely on a day officer to get their subjects warned.
It merits mention that on occasion prisoners have been "overlooked" and it was
even later than 8:30 A.M. before they were taken to a magistrate. A night court
would not completely solve the problem but if the 5:00 P.M. to midnight officers were
able to `gat their prisoners warned immediately, the day shift would only be responsibl
for transporting those who are arrested between midnight and 7:00 A.M.
Furthermore, the magistrate often finds himself faced with a situation where the
officer who brings the subjects to be warned at 8:30 A.M. has no real knowledge of the
allegations or incident behind the arrest and consequently cannot give the Court any
meaningful input in regard to the setting of bail.
A factor to be considered in creating a night court is the possible savings in over-
time -pay that might be realized if the second-shift officers could come to court while
on duty. If we had a third court with settings at 5:30, 6:30, and 7:30 P.M. we
could accommodate most, if not all, of the second shift officers. Then only the third
or midnight, shift would be paid overtime for court appearances in Municipal Court.
Another benefit that would stem from a night court would be the division of the "jail
docket" into- two twelve-hour time periods. We presently have a jail docket at
9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. and if anyone is picked up after 3:00 P.M., he must wait until
the next morning to enter a plea. This results in an extended incarceration for
those brought in after 3:00 P.M. and sometimes causes us to have a morning jail
docket with as many as 60 persons and an afternoon one with as few as one or two.
Next, by funding a night court, the Council would be offering an invaluable benefit
to the many citizens who work during the day and cannot leave their jobs to
contest a citation. We would not, however, be able to offer night settings for all
who may want them since cases must be set according to the issuing officer's
assigned court time and only those who receive tickets from second-shift officers woul
ever be able to have an evening setting.
A third court would allow us to reduce our backlog and provide each citizen with the
speedy trial he is promised by and entitled to under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Justice delayed, more often than not, is justice defeated. On certain days I am
now hearing cases which are five to six months old. Many of these have to be dis-
missed because the officer is simply unable to recall any details surrounding the
issuance of the citation.
I personally would like to see us be able to provide a trial 30 days after receiving
a request for such; A third court would make this possible.
Furthermore, a third court would improve the quality of justice available in our
court system. In an effort to keep the docket moving and reduce backlog, I have
long advocated the addition of extra settings to our court dockets. You may recall
that as an Assistant City Attorney I worked with you back in November 1975 to
increase the caseload from 4 daily settings of 8 cases each or 320 potential weekly
settings to 5 daily settings of 10 cases each for a total potential of 500 cases
weekly.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
t V
POLICY PROPOSAL (cont'd) PAGE_OF
After I took the bench of Court No. 2, I added 25 additional cases to my Court
and that increased the weekly figure to a potential of 525. As Chief Judge,
I have again revised the settings for both Courts and we now have the potential
to set 560 a week.
It is not difficult to see that any further expansion of the two courts' dockets
would dangerously impair the quality of justice. In fact, I am not entirely sure
that this hasn't already happened -- there is simply a limit to how many cases a
prosecutor can prosecute and a judge can hear. After all, "cafeteria-style"
justice is not something we should be proud of. Lastly, if and when we become a
court of record, we will have to set up a thii,1 court. It would be so helpful
to already have it in operation.
Recommendation
I propose that the Council consider this proposal of a third court at night or
consider changing one of the present day courts to a night court to determine
actual results. The estimated cost of an additional court is in the range of
$32,000 to $35,000 annually, based on not hiring an additional prosecutor.
Legality
Operation of night court is needed to more fully comply with existing statutes.
Fiscal Note
If it is determined that an additional court is to be provided, appropriations
will have to be made from prior year revenues.
City Manager's Comments
The operation of a night court could have significant benefits to the citizens.
Since there seems to be a major change occurring in the quantity of citations
being issued, an evaluation of the cost and benefits of a night court could be
tested by temporarily operating a night court with existing judges and personnel.
The test could be conducted in time to provide input into the budget for 1977-78.
3TY OF FORT WORTH, TEAS
MM SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS 1(. &C. C.
WAS FRESENTID TO THE CITY CORCIL
AND WAS Z4 _ V
APPROED
ic �C. Newklrk�, Cou�ncilman
hard
W,
City Secretary
CITY OF FORT WORTH