HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4159 .ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3011, BEING AN
ORDINANCE TO REGULATE AM RESTRICT THE LOCATION AIM
USE OF BUI"iDINGS, STRUCTURES, AIM LAND FOR 'MOE,
INDUSTRY, RESIDENCE, OR OTHER PURPOSES, THE HEIGHT,
NUFMR OF STORIES,AND SIZE OF BULDINGS AND OTHER
STRUCTURES, THE, SIZE OF YARDS AND Orl1ER OPEN SPACES,
CFF-STREET PAM ING AND LOADING AND ThE DENSITY OF
POPULATION; AND FOR SAID PURPOSES TO DIVIDE THE
PIUNICIPALITY INTO DISTRICTS OF SUCH TWIZER, SHAPE,
A'M AREA AS 1 AY BE DEEDED BENTBY FIXING'LEFINITE
USES OF TIE; BUILDINGS IEREINAFTEP EF,ECTED IN SAID
DESCRIBED AREAS FROI',i THE USES AS SHOWN ON TIE BAPS
CONTAINED IN SAID ORDINANCE NO. 3011; PRESCRIBING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN
$5.00 NOF. IVICRE THAN $200.00 FOR EACH OFFENSE, ;AND
THAT EACH DAY THAT A VIOLATION IS r=1ITTED TO EXIST
SHALL CONSTITUTE A ;SEPARATE OFFENSE: AND NAIIINGG AN
EFFLOTIVE DATE.
BE IT (WAIVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Thl, CITY OF FORT WORTH, TERAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 3011 be amended so that the following described uses in
the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as follows to wit:
ARE AS FRO1v1 TO
No. 59-Z=51: Area annexed by Ordinance No. 4047, adopted
April 10, 1959, being approximately 30 acres out of
the R. Vickery Survey, and being more fully described
as follows:
BEING a tract of land about 4 miles northwest of the
Courthouse of Tarrant County, Texas, and lying in the
R. Vickery Survey.
BEGINNING at a point in the present City of Fort
Worth City Limit Line, said point being in the east line
of the R. Vickery Survey, 591 - 4/10 feet from its
northeast corner;
THENCE south 52 degrees - 15 minutes west 330 - 2/10
feet to a point in the northeasterly line of a 49 acre
tract conveyed to Zilla Sansom by Deed recorded in
Volume 1145, Page 175 of the Deed Records of Tarrant
County, Texas said point being north 41 degrees - 29 min-
utes west 242 feet from the east corner of said tract;
THENCE south 52 degrees - 15 'minutes west 960 - 6/10
feet to a, point in the northeasterly line 6fi Ten IlUe
Bridge Road, in the present City of Fort North' City Limit
line;
THENCE southeasterly, easterly, northerly, westerly,
and northerly along the present,,, ,it
Fort Worth
City Limit Line to place of begi g ��Anneed
(2800 and 2900 blocks Ten Mile bA e,.Road -Angle Ave.) Are-all "Kit �
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - -
t, A,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59 Z-52: The residue of Lot 33, Block 2; and
the residue of Block 3, Parkside Addition "Bit IrEn
(5500 block of Pinson and Norris Streets)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59 -63: Block 72, Ridglea Hills Addition; and
the portion of Tract 3-B, F. S. Perry Survey Ding
south of the south line of Tilycliff Road extended "Btt ttEtt
(71.00 block of Stove Foundry Road)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-Z-61+ Lot 5, Block 27; Lots 5 and 6. Block 19,
TuiY11. J. Bailey Addition; Lots"A and 1, 2, 3, 33 and 34,
Block 8; Lot 25 Block 11; and Lots 5 and 6, Block 13,
Westgate Addition "Bu tsE Rif
(200 and 300 blocks Bailey Avenin)
No. 59-Z-67: Lot 1, Block 11; and Lot 22, Block 8,
J. 1 . Shirley Addition; Lot 12, Block 1; and Lot 1,
Black 25 Billings Subdivision "Btt ttEtt
(2000 and 2100 blocks Chestnut Avenue at N. W. 21st St.)
No. 5q Z-6B: Lots 1, 2 and 3, and a portion of Lot S,
Block 73; portions of Lots 2 and 3, Block 69, South
Hills Addition; and unplatted tract of ground lying
gest of the above described property and being bounded
by Rutland Avenue, Southgate Drive, County Roads 1002
and 1035 and the proposed extension of6 estcreek Drive,
except the 1'gest 1400 of the South 1351 of said tract ITT !IAIt
No. 59-Z-68: The 5.1314 of proposed Block 76, South
Hills Addition being the northwest corner of the
intersection of County Roads 1002 and 1035 and the
proposed extension of Westcreek Drive as shown on a
preliminary plat by Brookes Baker Surveyors received
in the Planning and Zoning Office, May 28, 1959 ttAYY "Et4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-Z-69: Lot 1, Block 1, Handley Heights South
Addition less right-of-way for proposed Southeast Loop) ttBtt tEtt
(6100 and 6200 blocks Willard Road at Cravens Road)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Noe 59-Z-73: Lot 7 thrazgh 10 and residue of Lot
11, Block 1; Lots 20 through 23 and residue of Lots
24, 25 and 26, Block ,2, Hyde Park Addition "Bit ttJat
(700 block of E. Jefferson Avenue)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. -Z-7 : The residue of Tract 2-E., J. -Katson
Survey City Tax Records) IV' "Ett
(North of 4 700 and 4800 blocks of r<hite Settlement Rd.)
No. 59-Z-75: Lots X and Y3'. Brookside Acres
100 block of Churchill Road - east side of street)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59Z-79; The I est 200 feet of Block 5, Parkside
Addition ofE be "B"
(3500 block of Stallcup I-Load.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SECTION 2.
The zoning regulations and districts, as herein established, have been made
in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety,
morals, and the General welfare of the community. They have been designed to lessen
congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to
provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, parks and other public requirements. They have been made with
reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the districts and
its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the
value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the
community.
SECTION 3 .
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Fort worth affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said
ordinance except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in
direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 4.
Should any section, clause or provision of this ordinance be declared by
the Court to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance
as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid.
SECTION 5.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates; disobeys, omits, neglects
or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions
of this ordinance shall be fined not less than Five and No/100 Dollars ($5.00) nor
more than Two Hundred and NoAOO Dollars ($200.00) for each offense. Each day
that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
56CTION 6.
This Ordinance will take effect and be in full force and effect from
and after its passage and publication as required by law.
AI A:YOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ITY ATTORNEY
Adopted: JUL 17 1959
CITY OF FORT
WORTH
ZONING COMMISSION HEARING
JUNE 1691959
1 : 30 P M•
OR D I N AG E COPY
Area of requested change
12 11 10
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Petitioners property
12 II 10 " 3 �2 1 Present zoning classification
13 14 15 16�17 18 19 20 21 22 \
/ 23 24
- _ 200 ft . Radius
12 11 -10 ` , y� v, of '
3 2 1
Signerspetition
o�
SCALE: I" = 200' UNLESS NOTED , TOP OF MAP IS NORTH UNLESS NOTED
ROUTE LIST FOR PROPOSED ZONING INSPECTIONS FOR MEETING OF
June 160 1959
NO. PAGE LOCATION PETITIONER SECTION
59-Z-63 5 7100 block Stove Foundry Road Lonnie R. Rodgers West
59r-Z-74 16 North of 4700 and 4800 blocks Dr. G. F. Pease West
White Settlement Road
59-Z-75 17 100 block Churchill Road Jessie E. Martin West
59-Z-64 6 200 and 300 blocks Bailey Faye D. Rankin West
59-Z-67 9 2000 and 2100 blocks Chestnut Mrs. We T. Percy North
Avenue
59-Z-66 8 3200 block Prairie Mrs. Josephine A. Toston North
59-Z-51 2 2800 and 2900 blocks Ten Mile Zoning Commission North
Bridge Road
59-Z-70 12 100 and 200 blocks Beach St. 0, J. Finstad East
59-Z-78 20 1500 block Wilson and V;eiler Lynn Stokes East
Blvd,
59-Z-60 4 6800 to 7100 blocks John T. V. T. Irons East
White Road
59-Z-76 18 2300 block Handley Drive and J. C. Pace East
6500 block Meadowbrook Drive
59-Z-69 11 6100 and 6200 blocks Willard Rd. Jack York & Tom Purvis East
59-Z-52 3 5500 block Pinson & Norris Sts. Riverside Home Builders Southeast
59-Z-79 21 3500 block Stallcup Road Zoning Commission Southeast
59-Z-72 14 2100 block Langston J. D. Thompson East
59-Z-65 7 1500 block E. Terrell We L. Smith Southeast
59-Z-73 1.5 700 blodk E. Jefferson D. S, Lowrance South
59-Z-46 1 4200 block Sandage M. T. Neel South
59-Z-77 19 4900 block James Lallah Wright South
59-Z-71 13 5500 block Farm to Market Sadie M. Lee South
Highway No, 731
59-Z-68 10 See Map Westcliff Co., Inc. South
r°
J� A„
G�
t� 1 L( \\c��v
IWO v,
IMI
y
2. f
cok� O J �k
AeE,4 .4NNEXE0 13Y 0,eD.'4X7
AP,elL IO, /959.
NO 59-2-, 51 . i
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
",4ilI EXEID AREA TO "WITIAL ZO/VI/VG
2800E 2900131-A'S TEN MILE fjRILVE ,PD.
NOPT/-1 S/!JE
Recommended _____ �_ Hwa v5 I ncl use r i a i
Petitioner ZOAIING COMM/.SS/ON
Denied----------- Percentage of Area :
Postponed_______ El Scale /"- Map No 3/x'32
Remarks
Hearing Date M4Y X9, 1959 Page No. 2
t ;
R 4
1
vo
In
66
I
I � 'ter•, � I
f0
t.� �sa�, i`-.J � Imo. �� i �� �t ^'�� ---• ---•
1 �--
,u}
NO 596wZ� 52
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
"13 " TWO F'"4MILY f TO COAI ERC IAL
5500 BLk' PINSOAI e "KRIS .5TS.
SOUTHEAST .BADE
Recommended _____D� Petitioner: All VER.SIIJE-HOME-f3LA
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area :
Postponed_______R Scale: No : 82
Remarks:
Hearing Date MA Y l9, IgbD Page No.__3 —
y� o •U TR T EEA!i
t A"
--
iLL e-)
DELETE
9
24
ICA
zo
CT
1
�.
-71W i
ToS�LU66-of-Pr_Qpo9e- WycI i ff Irl.
N 0 5902 63
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
fS' TWO
7/00 15"1
Recommended ___ p� Petitioner :-
Denied___________❑ Percentage of Area : Co2�
Postponed_______ El Scale /""= = "' Map No :-5-
Remarks:
Hearing Date /3.5-9 Page No.—S,
23' 1 'Grrd
1'71
22)
- I L.fl� 111
1_ '- -_ 1
O £!Z
64
N 59ewZ—
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
TO
Recommended Petitioner
a
Denied-------- of Area
,---❑ Percentage
Postponed_______ 0 Scale: Map No :—
Remarks:
o :Remarks � '_' - >�:���. . _ ��' - - - . •� ..._-.�.
Hearing Date Page No.
to 3
t i
1Z X13 11�
'7LjU/ 8 • + I8
1 5 _
j 2 • 4 Z. ' t ^• .• 4
10 0
to 10 •- L�' tl • • L ?I
T-NE-N; Y-
0
-• 13 2 • 1 • .3 � i�
i • i -- 4 3 14 r.
—0 • i 16
1517I � V7 / f
t4
e � B I' �\✓ ft u --
0
10 2
N 0 59 Zo" 67
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
B.. Two FAM/L Y RES/DENT/QL TO "E"COMME,PC/4L
Z000,''Z100 15L1l3-- CHE,5'T.,V U7-AVE-
Recommended _____Q Petitioner: RAS- WTPEPCy
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area : G3q
Postponed_______n Scale: 1'=ZoO' Map No : -�
Remarks:
'ti Hearing Date JUNE 16, /.959 Page No. g
0
Z*00
r
V �A•. � � d
1002 }a � _ 1
--City Limit Line--� ,•3 ��----------- ---- __._ . --- ---- -----.. .,� O
``" Tom_. A.O Tom.• �
'`f G , ,�'-" t) ��t,}`'tom�- ��4-�,•. �
N959 -Z- (G5
PROPOSED CHANGE FPQNI
A"'ONE FAM/LY 5' 'EE"c0MME,eC1AL TO A"ONE FAM/LY R`` 'E"Cc
_ SOurH SIDE
Recommended ____L� Pet boner: w-".5
Denied-- ---- - -_❑ Percentage of
Postponed-- -___� Scale
Remarks --
Hearin� Dafe
, ..
1.-ii , 40 `,. .•, .,,
Vs.<Am4,, • \ t.l. .,II ,` .' X
1.: _
;04, irA, ,cb
.- •
IT
.--
o ,/ •.- „ -•,, "4, ? ''.( iiii... ,„ ',.. cip
LL., -1, ''• . ."3' V'...)\ , /,,
,, • # ,z.
..
"D"- A6; /".. '
, N ,-..r .
>,
N.-4. . ,
i0
f 0•,,k /
S.
...,
.%
CIA/
. \ / y:'
. .
, p- „:
/
__. 'OK / / \ X /
4Y)__ / / \ ' t,t•
///ir
•O
/ I I A0/1 ,‘.
, .;',. /'"
5
/ / wit'll, ' NO- / ,',2. \v
/ ,C° 0 / / ,,''' --!---; IIP
0 7
_ I [77____ - - i 020A ..A'. ° 1 I / / / ‘104 1-
tt- a
;e 1 0I t, ,(" ,/ r /
/ / at -. 71 6 400
/ C / / tiro . 4
. 4
.''',\,, V• se \:- . I /
/ I 1
fr-1,1
i I V,
/ ..,4...w.
.... . 41
DC;''... -T., : •-•"- ( Co,)r.; -7--. r,---L-- .•--2- .:. !,...c.•,.- ,3'.-.,. ,:-- ,'.-,1s.S„) R.O.b....1
. /--
,-••
/
o 1 TP As,0 T
4PAL 0 ! C),,\l /
1 • , , 4 . ' 41- 7 • 'NI..7.
3•1,-P.1`,•
/I
1
--7
N 59...z... G8
.. . PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
-.4-ONE F.21M/LY c' "E"CONIAIERCZ4Z. yo :4-ONE h-401-1/Le
SOUTH 5/DE
Recommend eci____Err PetItioner: IVE.57-CL/FF Ce- J .
Denied _C1 Percentase of Area' 90.ô%.
Postponed _D Scale: /"'Foo" Map No: 641'/3/
Remarks,:
Hearin2 Date JUNE,/a,__9,p _ Page Mo. 10
LO
0
t •
zi
..------ [ .• n - •f • i
i
I
N
0 59-Z- 69
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
TO
Recommended Petitioner f'L
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area
Postponed_______ 0 Scale: Map No : 37
Remarks
Hearing Date Page No.
�fk
t' .
---
P84 -_.., I
t
• ► • El t
� SI
✓45
O _ r
r
O
N 59awZo" 73
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
7wo rl,,4/11.' yRl�_`;, ',�: . • TO J
SOU7:'•' . '?c
Recommended Petitioner :
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area
���== `
Postponed_______ Scale: Mop No � LL, '
Remarks
Hearing Date Page No. ��
t 6 �
<
91V
C E.
O
N
° 59-Z- 74
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
TO
Recommended _____Ef Petitioner :—,/De
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area : U •'�
Postponed_______ El Scale ?(3, r Map No :-
Remarks:
o :Remarks
Hearing Date -''=/' %�� `T ' ' Page No. t Co
A'Y
h
SEE/SOCKET 'V.59 Z-7¢' -?
4-10 l
- v/-/i%..
N059"-Z-75
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
/Ora Piz/V
Recommended ___._D Petitioner
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area
Postponed------- El Scale: °° " Map No : 3T,
Remarks:
Hearing Date Page No. ��
t.
. .
•
\''
,0 °
0
t'). \ r
I q.
0 .
• Mil. I
. ,
,e-.--; ;,'
-- _
outlaw (--cpc,--.)
sy.wri,tr: i • /.7 ,:-;
. k,.,•t 0411110 r.:) .i (%
i'`.
t***4
C ,' .4,,4.- !;%\ .4 9 I I '7 0 ! •. C)
/.
4Li3...._• ,:-----/-7 - L'4' - -
• - 'rs • ,.
t*, ''‘'.Alt _. _.
- - --
1_1, __ , ,.. Yetato.w aataxox,
M
_ • ://A-e g. e
.,..________,A. , , , ,
\
• : v \ • / /8-.4 re. i-G -1.f
-1 -
. .
s....r, /7
k•V'c,„...._,,...., ',,,,;:‘ -:' '.-. ..,,;.:: OF" TEC)
CD
. ./C.
I A -
f 44
p./..- .
• . ,':,
/ 4
• ,. _ _ ___ ,
'...,',
_..,
11k ....*--' 0—--
f------ --------—
------f----- —----— 7 1
N 0 59...z. 76
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
'4 '.0/Ve:77 .174/1,1./..'.;." E'e".5-':,--)e.' . ' TO :::.-c• • ,„.:....f-:;.'(::/A L
'.2. ),01<,'..t..',10.4' L,;•'::.
r_,45-,-- '.;/...::_4:
- = ,
Recommended _____E / / r . / 4: E
EZ Petitioner : -'• - , •
Denied 0 Percentage of Area :
Postponed________El Scale: /"c ' s' ' Map No : 5 °
Remarks:
1 Hearing Date • 'j/.:: /C',/,,,-,: • Page No.______6___)
1 R 2 3 14
!1011
u 32 31 0' .28 27
3 2 I N _ _ i
STI
;19
= 10 NC)i6a)S s �:
I L 3 4 5:
LL - - 13 -
6 9 14
21 IA t7 I
Z16 13
CO
} r
-1`r
rr4*"
t
N ° 59-260 79
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
TO
Recommended _____C Petitioner: 20,"1
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area
Postponed_______0 Scale: Map No : 8�
Remarks:
Hearing Date Page No.—