HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2751A Resolution
NO.~'L
APPROVING THE 2001-2002 CRIME CONTROL PLAN
AND BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY THE DIRECTORS
OF THE FORT WORTH CRIME CONTROL
AND PREVENTION DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on June 20 2001 the Board of Directors of the Fort Worth
Crime Control and Prevention District approved its 2001 2002 Budget;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORTH WORTH,
That the City Council, through the approval of this resolution, adopts the attached
2001 2002 Crime Control Plan and Budget as approved by the Directors of the
Fort Worth Cnme Control and Prevention District and will include this budget as a
part of the City of Fort Worth Fiscal Year 2041 2002 budget when it is approved.
Adopted this 10th day of July 2001
APPROVED
CITY CO~INC1~
JUG 10 ~~~
~~~~
city s~.a~ry of Une
City of Part Wortti,'I'exau~
•
C~ ~ --
Mayor Kenneth arr
CITY OF FORT WORTH
COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND
EXPENDITURES
ORIGINAL REVISED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSAL PROPOSAL ADOPTED
1998.1999 1999.2000 2000.2001 2001.2002 2001.2002 2001.2002
Violent Crime and Gangs
Crime Response Teams $2,826,521 $3,081,988 $3,191 419 $3,283,777 $3,497,949
Strategic Operations Fund 397,260 463,770 559,499 587 475 587 467
Expanded Narcotics Investigation 565,922 658,516 681,043 662,394 743,387
Gang Graffiti Enforcement 441,827 465,387 498,337 532,506 558,809
Gang Graffiti Abatement 222,761 210,345 264,810 264,810 268,293
SCRAM 120.212 124.724 219.220 220,972 232.997
Sub-Total $4,574,503 $5,004 730 $5,414,328 $5,551,934 $5,888;902
Neighborhood Crime
Neighborhood Patrol Officers $1,668,438 $1,873,637 $1,992,280 $2,057,824 $2,240,910
li Additional Patrol Officers 0 0 0 0 424,988
Neighborhood Policing Districts 2,734,285 2,958,823 3,286,411 3,357,908 3,658,077
CODE BLUE 68,669 140,867 301,600 301,600 245,750
Police Storefronts 39,961 45,271 121 400 121,650 71 400
Neighborhood Crime Demolition 70,520 95,427 108,000 108,000 108,000
Parks Community Policing 558,700 674 755 660,529 660,529 660,529
Neighborhood Code Compliance 232,370 265,229 275,275 275,275 319,422
Demolition of Substandard Structures 1.083,623 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $6,456,566 $6,054,009 $6 745,495 $6,882,786 $7 729,076
School Security Initiative $2,903,665 $3,407,864 $3,598,058 $3,772,374 $3,903,395
After School Program 0 0 1.400.000 1.400.000 1,400.000
Sub-Total $2,903,665 $3,407,864 $4,998,058 $5,172,374 $5,303,395
CITY OF FORT WORTH 2001-2002 BUDGET
•
7/3/01
_~..
COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND
EXPENDITURES
•
ORIGINAL REVISED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSAL PROPOSAL
1998-1999 1999-2000 2000.2001 2001.2002 2001.2002
Recruit Officer Training $1,238,192 $1,554,849 $1,327434 $1,021103 $1436,501
Civil Service Pay Plan 5,329,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 5,329,547
Increased Jail Costs 811 750 1 404 750 1,577 438 1,608,986 1,608,986
Replacement of High Mileage Vehicles 3,360,118 2,760,716 3,475,200 3,475,200 3,475,200
Special Operations Division Vehicles 252,302 277 156 280,600 280,600 280,600
Police Cadets 110,621 147,995 181,290 181,290 189,244
Contingency for Salary Increase 0 0 600,000 1,200,000 0
Special Events Overtime 411,323 434,023 481,507 510,398 552,545
Technologylnfrastructure 1,295,693 1,222,270 2,130,892 2,542,068 2,233,223
Modernize Police Weapons 0 143,000 45,000 45,000 0
Video Cameras in Beat Patrol Vehicles 0 97,080 105,240 105,240 0
Prisoner Transfer Van 0 31,550 0 0 0
CAD Project Transfer 10,286,974 0 0 0 0
Mobile Data Computers/CAD Operating Exp. 1 761,380 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000
Program Evaluation/Resource Analysis 0 0 610,000 610,000 610,000
Election Costs 0 134.860 0 0 0
Sub-Total $24,857,900 $13,537 796 $18,644 148 $19 409,432 $18,215,846
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 38,792,634 28,004,399 35,802,029 37,016,526 37 137,219
Interest Dedicated to Phase Out Funding $0 $0 $1 408,000 $1 485,040 $1 485,040
ADOPTED
2001.2002
TOTAL COMMITMENTS $38,792,634 $28,004,399 $37,210,029 $38,501,566 $38,622,259
CITY OF FORT WORTH 2001 2002 BUDGET
~ •
7/3/01
Fort Worth
Crime Control and Prevention District Plan
_ ~ Executlv..e Summary
FY 2001 - 2002
Phase I of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District was approved by voters on March 24 1995
implemented on October 1 1995 and ended on September 30 2000 Voters overwhelmingly approved a five year
renewal of the District on May 6 2000 and Phase II started on October 1 2000
Mi$$iOn The Fort Worth Police Department provides quality service in partnership with the
community to create a safe environment for all.
ViSiOn To make Fort Worth, Texas the safest major city in the United States.
Goals
a. To attain a crime rate of 6,227 03 Part I crimes per 100 000 population.
b To reduce the rank of Fort Worth among mayor cities to 30`h
c To increase citizen participation m the CODE BLUE program.
•
d To support the operations of the police department through the acquisition of equipment,
technology and •the retention and recruitment of high quality officers.
e To support the adoption of a prevention focus by the police department and the community
f To provide a secure environment in which children can receive an education.
Awards
1995
Weber Seavey Award Finalist
1996
Criminal Justice Award
Texas Attorney Generals Office
1997
Excellence in Community Policing Award
National League of Cities
• Special Recognition for Cruise Prevention
United States Housing Department
1998
`' Bud W111oughby Award-~-Exc-el~l~enr~ in Policing .~ _
Mayor C1t1es Chlefs ~ ~~~""~
Award for Program Excellence Public Safety
In memory of W1lltam H Hansen Sr and Al1ce. Hansen
International Crty/County Managers Association (ICMA)
1999
Finalist
Innovations in American Government
Ford Foundation
Medallion for Vision and Leadership
Boys & Girls Clubs of America
Crime Control and Prevention District Plan
Executive Summary Fiscal Year 2001 - 2002
Pale 2
Rev 1 02 05/22/01
Plan & Budget
~Nlost of the components of these l.ey areas appeal in both years with some only operated during a single fiscal
"~ year ~ll of these s"trategies arc inte>_-~voven with each other and also interconnected ~vrth operations funded
through the General Revenue Fund and various giant fund sources All components of the plan are divided into
foul l.ey areas
i Violent Cruse and Gangs
II Neighborhood Crunc
III ~CI'1001 ~:1feC\ and ~ OLICh
I\ Police i,nhancements
l~he component descriptions belo\v are by area :old provide the proposed budgets for both Fiscal 1 ears 2000
xO01 and 2001 2UO2
I Violent Crime and Gangs
• Crime Response Teams
C'rune Response "Teams target any emerging crone trend affecting Part I crimes Each team consists of 10
officers one detective and a sergeant and is assigned to each of the Field Operations Divisions, for a total of
48 positrons
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $3 497 949
• Strategic Operations Fund
Strategic Operations Fund is used by divisions of the Field Operations Bureau and the Special Services Bureau
to target particular outbreak of criminal activity Prior to the use of the funds the supervisor of the unit
\\ antul~~ to use the o\ ertune funds develops a plan An assessment is completed once the operation rs
completed
Fiscal 1 ear 2001 2002 Budget $587 467
• Expansion of 1\rarcotics Unit
This component \vas added during the second year of the first Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention
District and added 10 additional detective positions and lease cars to the Special Operations Division It has
successfully lo\\ tied the response time to tips and/or complaints from citizens regarding narcotics problems
from several days to one day
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $743 387
~. • Cru»e Conn•ol and Prcvenhon Distract Plan
Executive Summary Fiscal ~ car 20U I -ZOO'
Page ~
Rev I U2 Oi/22/U I
Gang Graffiti Enforcerent
This program was also added to the District during the second year and consists of eight police officers
f,, assigned to the S,~ecial Operations Division. They generally are assigned as atwo-officer team operating in
each of the four Field Operations Divisions to identify and attempt to apprehend graffiti offerid`ers and
`taggers They have made a number of arrests and been involved in the significant reduction of graffiti
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget 5558 809
Gang Graffiti .4Uatement
A companion component to the Gang Graffiti Enforcement program, this is operated by the Parks and
Comnunuty Services Department and targets the removal of all graffiti u1 the city Thts project operates a paint
bank and has contract funds for high-tech removal of graffiti from complex structures Two civilian employees
are included to this component.
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $268,293
SCRAM
The police department received partial funding through a state grant to initiate a sex offender registration unit
in 1998 A proposal was made to the District to receive additional funds to implement a comprehensive unit,
titled the Sex Crimes Registration Apprehension and Monitoring Unit (SCRAM) This unit handles the
re,istration of all sex offenders, publishes the required advertisements, collects mtetligence data, monitors
compliance by offenders and makes arrests when necessary
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $232 997
II Neighborhood Crime
\eighboi•hood Patrol Officers (NPOs)
34 NPO positions are funded through the District our of 89 total assignments. Some of these are assigned to
beats as the principal NPO others are assigned to special areas such as housing communities, parks and
universities They also provide assistance with mobile storefronts
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget. $2,240 910
\eighboi-hooct Policing Districts
The Neighborhood Policing District concept was uutiated in the Weed ~. Seed grant and later expanded «ith a
combmatwn of Crude Control and Prevention District, grant, and general revenue funds There are cui-i-ently
12 Neighborhood Policing Districts with 8 being housed in leased facilities 4 located at city owned Field
Operations Division headquarters and 1 sharing a city building with the Traffic Division. This component
includes fiords for 8 leases, including the newly opened headquarters for Neighborhood Policing District 3 as
well as utilities maintenance etc It also provides salaries and benefits for 21 positions, including 13 sworn
officers and 8 clerical support personnel
l t~cal 1 c.ar 2UU"1 ?U02 13ud~;er $3,357 9U8
Crime Conh~ol and Prevention District Plan
Execute e Summary Fiscal Ycar 2001 - 200
Page
Rcv 102 0~/~2/U I
CODE BLUE
Provides operattg funds for the Crttzens on Patrol program, tncludmg the purchase of 80 portable radios m
,. f each of the next tlvo years, gasoline retmbursement, caps, wtndbreakers, signs, and other operating costs
Combined with purchases to previous years thts will result to more than 600 portable radios for the program
Funds tncluded for purchase of Reserve Officer radios have been moved to the Local Law Enforcement Blo
Grant (LLEBG)
Ftscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $245 750
ck
• Police Storefronts
The poltce department currently has 23 poltce storefronts scattered throughout the ctty These are generally
small office areas provided to the city at no or low cost by a landlord and are sometimes uttltzed by
Neighborhood Police Officers and beat officers to complete paperwork and to assist the public with
comnutntty problems Some CODE BLUE groups also utilize this space Funds are included to this component
for utthttes supplies and other operating costs and this year have been reduced to reflect actual historical
expenditures
Ftscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $71 400
• Neighborhood Crime Demolition
Inrttally this project was conceived to elmunate the prototypical crack" house a residence remade into a
fortttied structure that sold crack cocaine like fast food These factltttes have largely disappeared and been
replaced with less recognizable houses that contribute to crane and decline to neighborhoods These are often
. abandoned houses or leased substandard structures with `broken windows issues. After these locations are
identified a list is compiled of structures that qualify for demoltrion. This component tivtll provide funds to
process the paperwork required for demoltrion and pay for the materials, equipment, and personnel required.
Ftscal Year 2001 2002 Budget• $108 000
Parks Community Policing
This component funds security for crttzens uhltztng Parks and Community Services factltttes This mcIudes a
nuY of off-dut~- poltce ofticers and private securtty at selected locations The project has been highly
successful with almost no violent acts reported at comnntntty factltttes m the past year and an extremely lo~i-
amount of crmze at parks throughout the city
Ftscal ~ ear 2001 2002 Budget $660,529
• \eighborhood Code Compliance
This program supports five code compliance officers and an office assistant who works closely with the poltce
dep~u-tment to respond to code violations that contribute to blight to netghborhoods Neighborhood
deterioration can be a contributing factor to crime to netghborhoods Thts program allows a focused response
to flits problem
Ftscal Year 2001 - 2002 Budget $319 422
•
Crm~e Control and Prevention District Plan
Erecutne Summary Fiscal Year 2001 - 2002
Page ~
Rev 1 02 05/22/01
III School Safety and Youth
•~ School Securita~•hnitiative
The Fort Worth Police Department and area school districts have long been partners m the effort to provide a
safe environment for education. The School Security Initiative places a police officer in every participating
middle and high school in Fort Worth. Personnel costs are shared with school dtstrtcts on a 50/50 basis The
program cun-ently includes the Keller Crowley and Everman dtstrtcts, which Have eligible schools withii the
Fort Worth city lumits
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $3 903.,395
After School Probram
National research conducted during the past 5 years has recognized that adolescents are at a higher risk of
being a victmn of crime or committing a crmimal act, during the hours of 3 OOpm to 6 OOpm on a school day
than at any other time The primary response to this situation has been the creation and/or expansion of a
variety of after school, or non-school hour programs. Amulti-disciplinary task force consisting of city
ofticials school district personnel and related service providers conducted extensive research on this situation
and developed a plan to implement a coordinated program in schools throughout the city that have documented
juvenile creme problems A steering committee consisting of several persons on the original task force
oversees this project This program supplements and does not supplant existing programs and will include a
myriad of activities, including academics arts athletics and other programs designed to be interesting to
young people
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $1 400 000
IV Police Department Enhancements
Recruit Ofticer Trainin
Approxnmately nine to 10 months is requu'ed to frilly train and outfit a new police officer to work in the field.
All Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention Distract components consist of experienced personnel, most of
whom have been transferred from the Field Operations Bureau which has the patrol fiunction. The transfer of
these officers can have a detrimental effect upon the patrol function unless a pipeline of replacement
personnel is maintained. The police department conducts continuous personnel turnover analyses to determine
the number of recruit personnel needed to avoid personnel shortages and to ensure that all Fort Worth Crinie
Control and Prevention District components remain frilly staffed. For the latter reason, all costs for personnel
training were moved to the District during the third year of Phase I.
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budaet• SI 436,501
Crime Control and Prevention District Plan
Executive Summary Fiscal Year 2001 - 2002
Pale 6
Rev 102 0/22/01
• Civil Service Pay Plan
Prior to the implementation of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District in 199$ pay levels in the
. Fort Worth Police Department as compared to other agencies within the area had fallen so low rt was
becoming difficult to attract quality recruits and to retain experienced officers One of the problems .'vas that ~''~
step raises ceased after 4 years of experience leaving promotions or cost of living increases the only
possibility of a raise The pay plan extended 5% scheduled raises for every four years up to 20 years of
service This component fiinds the pay schedule raises previously given and those scheduled during the next
24 months
Fiscal Year 200] 2002 Budget• $x,329,547
• lncreased Jail Costs
The Fort Worth Police Department does not operate a local ail and contracts with the Tarrant County Sheriffs
Department for these services This service began in 1985 and the program has been in continuous utilization
since then with modifications as to daily costs During the third year of the ,original District this component
was added to assist in increases due to higher arrest rates by Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District
funded entities and other incremental increases. It is projected that total Fiscal Year~ail costs will be
$2,266,50 which is based upon the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Fort
Worth and the T arrant County Sheriff's Department. With the election of a new Sheriff we hope to renew
discussions for a new~ail contract within the next fiscal year
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $1 608 986
• 12eplacement of High Mileabe Vehicles
The Police Department formulated a vehicle replacement plan for the original District that would allow the
modernization of the fleet over a five year period This plan was revised m 1998 and is now producing results
~~ ith no assigned beat car having more than 100 000 miles m the past year To maintain this plan rt is necessary
to consistently purchase fleet replacement vehicles and move higher mileage cars to units that have less
demanding operational needs
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $3 475,200
Special Operations Division Vehicles
The Special Operations Division includes the Narcotics Section and other units that must utilize `undercover
vehicles In order to maxmlize the effectiveness of the unit, a lease system for 30 vehicles has been established
~a hich allows the rotation of cars when the are spotted by drug dealers Operating costs and maintenance are
also included u~ this component.
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $280 600
• Crime Control and Prevention District Plan
Execute e Summary Fiscal Year 2001 - 2002
Page
Rev 1 02 0/22/01
• Police Cadets
The Police Cadet program provides funds to hire college students ~vho are interested in becoming a Fort Worth
police officer They are paid a salary provided a uniform, and placed within different divisions of the
department. Accommodations are made for class schedules
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget' $189,244
• Special Events Overtiine
The growing number of special events within the city began to place a strain on the police department budget,
particularly foIlowmg the opening of the Texas Motor Speedway This component provides funds for officers
to conduct outside secunty including traftlc control, at all special events Past events have included all
ftinctions at the Texas Motor Speedway Bass Hall performances, parades etc It does not include inside
security which is paid by the enterprise holding the event.
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget. $552,545
Technology Infrastructure
During fiscal year 1998-99 year 4 of the District, the police department became part of the citywide local area
network. This protect, dubbed Technology Infrastructure provided for wiring at all police facilities, computer
servers, support equipment, and the lease of over 500 personal computers The system allows for collaboration
on information, email and controlled mternet access The department chose to lease personal computers rather
than purchase after a comprehensive lease/purchase analysis. This approach allowed the ability to stay current
with the Iatest improvements of technology This component continues the leases necessary to operate the
networl: but also adds new programs to make badly needed improvements. Ftmds are included to serve as cash
match for a federal grant application to obtain a new Records Management System.
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $2,233,223
Mobile Data Computers
The current mobile data computers were placed in frill operation in December 2000 These devices are leased
m order to stay current with the latest unprovements of technology This component includes funds to continue
the lease on all current devices, allows for some expansion, and includes maintenance and licensing costs for
associated software These devices allow officers to quickly query a variety of databases and will soon allow
officers to complete reports u1 the field.
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $2,500 000
• Program Evaluation/Resource Analysis
JusTex, a consulting firm with extensive law enforcement and management research experience was awarded
the contract for this study and are currently study many aspects of the department They tivill soon complete a
preluninary report on patrol resources and will then research almost all facets of police operations The total
cost of the study is $1,220 000
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $610 000
Cnme Control and Prevention District Plan
Executive Sununary Fiscal Year 2001 - 2002
Pave S
Rev 1 02 05/22/01
Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Summation
Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget $37 137 219
Authorized Positions FY 2001 2002 194
•
~ • Crime Control and Prevention Disreict Plain
Executive Summary Fiscal 1 car 2UU1 - 2002
Pa,e 9
Rev 1 02 0/22/01
•
SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES
DEPARTMENT
CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT
CHANGES FROM 2000-2001 ADOPTED TO 2001-2002 PROPOSED
2000-2001 ADOPTED $37,210 029 A:P 184
2001 2002 PROPOSED $37,137,219 A.P 194
A) During FY2001 projected interest of $1 408 000 was included in the total budget as a commitment
dedicated to the phase-out fund However these funds do not need to be appropriated since they will not
actually be expended. Therefore, the FY2002 Proposed Budget excludes $1 485 000 in projected interest.
B) The proposed budget includes full-year funding of $424 988 for the addition of nine patrol officers that were
added as a mid-year adjustment during FY2000-2001
C) The proposed budget includes funds of $111 516 with one office assistant to operate Neighborhood
Policing District #3 This facility was finalized during FY1999-2000 after the Crime Control and Prevention
District (CCPD) budget had been approved. As a result, the facility expense is being absorbed in the General
Fund budget of the Police Department. In addition personnel to provide clerical support is loaned from the
North Division The proposed budget legitimizes both of these expenses in the CCPD budget which is the
funding source for all other stand-alone district facilities
D) The proposed budget reflects approximately $628 190 across all programs for potential salary increases
and step raises of CCPD sworn personnel In addition civil service retirement has been increased by $74,378
In prior years, a salary increase contingency program has been funded to offset potential future increases as
determined by the City Council during the regular budget process. However a new budget system has
allowed the distribution of potential salary increases among operating programs.
E) The proposed budget includes $345 034 for anticipated rate increases for group health insurance.
F) The rate of pay for desk officers has been increased based on shift in order to consistently fill the positions
with retired officers This prevents the use of on-duty officers who should be working in patrol. The cost of the
increase is $106 500
G) In the FY2002 proposed budget, programs staffed with police personnel overtime have been increased by
five percent at a total cost of $100 696 in order to avoid a reduction of funded hours if a salary increase is
approved
H) Several equipment needs have been removed from the CCPD budget and will be acquired with funds from
awarded assets and the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. The resulting reductions are. $45 000 for the
final year of the Police Weapon Modernization Program, $105,240 for the third year of the Video Camera
Purchase Program (beat cars); and $75 850 for the purchase of radios for reserve officers planned in the
CODE.BLUE Program.
I) A reduction of $50 000 is reflected in the Police Storefront Program to more accurately reflect historical
spending. Excess funds have been retained in this program for several years to address unforeseen locations
and lease costs. Based on experience this is unnecessary
J) The proposed budget includes $31,548 in Increased Jail Costs. The City continues to operate under a
memorandum of understanding that increases payments by 2% each year
GI I Y Vf FURT WVRTH 2001 2002 BUDGET
7/3/01
•
•
•
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER
CRIME CONTROL 8~ PREVENTION DISTRICT-POLICE GR79/0351000~0356500
SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL REPONSIBILITIES
The Police Department,. under the direction of the Chief of Police develops
and implements programs to deter crime and enforce traffic laws in order
to protect life and property within the City of Fort Worth Specific
departmental responsibilities include crime prevention the apprehension
of persons suspected of committing crimes recovery of stolen property
and regulation of non-criminal conduct such as traffic enforcement
Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget
1999-2000 2000-2001 2001 2002 2001 2002
Personal Services X13 354 974 $14 438 312 $15 914 109
Supplies 757 970 647 407 472 307
Contractual Services 9 751 802 15 519 072 15 540 609
Capital Outlay 2 989 324 3 996 624 3 961 950
Total Allocations X26 854 070 $34 601 415 535 888 975
Authorized Positions 174 0 176 0 186 0
CITY OF FORT WORTH 2001 2002 BUDGET
5/16/01
•"
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER
CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT GR79i0214002
CITY SERVICES
SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL REPONSIBILITIES
The City Services Department consists of three operating divisions Code Compliance
Division, responsible for protecting and improving the quality of life in the City by enforcing
the City's environmental codes Equipment Services Division responsible for maintaining
the City's vehicular and equipment fleet, and Solid Waste Management, responsible for
collection and disposal of solid waste for the general public. Only the Code Compliance
Division of City Services is represented in the Crime Control and Prevention District
The Code Compliance Division promotes and enforces the environmental code of the City
through inspection of neighborhoods and buildings Public relations and educational
programs are integral parts of an effort to reduce the need for a primary focus on
enforcement; however legal action to enforce the City code is initiated when necessary
Enforcement of environmental codes is an invaluable too( in crime prevention because of
the relationship between neighborhood deterioration and high incidences of criminal
activity Code enforcement activity often helps in criminal investigations particularly at
locations involved in drugs and stolen vehicles and will contribute to an overall reduction
of the crime rate and citizen fear of crime
Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget
1999-2000 2000 2001 2001 2002 2001 2002
Personai Services $215,386 S203,232 5271 142
Supplies 37,832 33 888 26,361
Contractual Services 12,011 38 155 21,919
Capital Outlay 0 0 0
Total Allocations $265,229 X275,275 X319 422
Authorized Positions 6 0 6 0 6 0
CITY OF FORT WORTH 2001 2002 BUDGET
5r1sro1
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY
'~ DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER
•
CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT GR79 / 0800511 0808080
PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES
SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL REPONSIBILITIES
The Parks and Community Services Department is responsible for
planning designing developing and maintaining the City's network of
parks as well as for the planning and administration of various recreation
and human services programs that the City offers
Parks and Community policing and security and graffiti abatement are
integral parts of crime control and prevention While aggressive law
enforcement activity is an obvious need in making Fort Worth the safest
large city in the United States this alone does not ensure that Fort Worth
will remain afirst-class city It is important that the public also have
available quality of life amenities including libraries entertainment and
parks People will use these amenities particularly the parks only if they
feel safe in them Graffiti if left unabated breeds even more graffiti and
potential violent conflict among the gangs that spread it
Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget
Allocations 1999-2000 2000-2001 20012002 2001 2002
Personal Services ~ S594,237 ~ 5502 840 ~ $506 323
Supplies 5 315 8 330 8 330
Contractual Services 285 548 414 169 414 169
Capital Outlay 0 0 0
Total Allocations 5885 100 $925 339 5928 822
Authorized Positions 2 0 2 0 2 0
• CITY OF FORT WORTH 2001 2002 BUDGET
8
5/16/01
•
5/16.01 Board Presentation Phase
CITY OF FORT WORTH 2001 2002 BUDGET
•
COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND
REVENUES
ORIGINAL REVISED
ACTUAL ACTUAL BUOGET PROPOSAL PROPOSAL ADOPTED
1998.1999 1999.2000 2000.2001 2001.2002 2001.2002 2001.2002
Sales T Collections S37,334,070 534,217,530 534,570,863 536,057,697 53a 410,655
School Security Initiative 899,853 1 423,735 1,645,950 1,733 107 1,796,516
Interast Earned 1,064,202 858,096 1 400,000 t 400,000 1 x85,040
fvfiscellaneous Revenue 7J825 14.788 0 0 135.000
TOTAL 533,325,950 536,574149 537,716,813 539,190,804 537,827,211
NOTE. Adopted budget for FY2001 adjusted to effect merest olle ctiens.
CITY OF FORT WORTH 2009 2002 BUDGET
5/16/01
2
N
•
~ ~ N
n
~ m
~ Q
z
~
v l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o~
°
o 0 0 0
0
0
l 0 0 0
~ o° o 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 o M O O•i N N CV +- O O
o N
~ m
n o
. N
w
N
~ ~
°
°o, °o °o oI
°o
°o °o
°
°
°
°
°
0
°
~
n o
o 0 0 0
o
v
o
I o,
0 0
°• °
0
o
o°
o
o
0
O O ? o c o M O O ~ N CV 0 0 O N
b
Q m
O r
~ N
Q ~ ~ o o° o° o° o° °o o° o~ o 0 0
°
° 0 °
°
°
~
0 0 0 0
0
I
O OI 0
o
0 0
o o
o
0 0
O ~ O ~ O O ~ N N O O O .T
~ O] ~
N
u~ d .o N
° ~
~ a
Q m N
Z
w
(~ O o '- v
N n ~
~ in o co
~
0 u~
O
~ ~ N f~ 7
Q C
i n
a0'
n ~ ~ ~ ~ O W
M to C)
O O
N N t0 Q1
CO CO M OO tf
~ ~
G
Q?
O
O if) C h lf') N V C'
W ~
Z ,~
O I h
O ~
O ~ G~
N
~ h ~}
~
N r M
r W h
~..
~ d
n O O rt r ti HNT ~
N l
0 ~
n/
LL , N ~ r
O ~ ~
F
•
U
O ° v v o
N t M O
1 v
V
O d
M
0
O
~ ~
(D
O
M
~ ~ ~ OO N to 1' N p ~ ~ 0
0
E
N O ~ O C
') O
J
Q
V O N N 00 N ~I
M C O h f~ M ~ M V M
J O ~ 0 O N ~ to ~ ~ n ~ O
~` N n ~ ~ N
J ~
Q ~ 0
O r ~ ^ ~ _ M
r ~ ~ ~ N O
Q ~ dq ~ 47
~
-
7
i.
W
N
d
O
!~ LA O Ify
Q) 1~
W
CD
l!] O
l!j
N
0
O
C
p
O
to 00
O
M
OJ h
to
M
f
A- ~t
d
~ V _
~ 1~ t~C1
G O ~ O 000 n G^'~ f~
~ O_ 00 '7 M O 00 N fD h N N
U ~ O M O O M O O
~ V O
tI'i ti M r n d O O
~
Q a O
O 07 r r
'' CO r h
tiT N N r
G~
d W EF! fn ~ r,
6R
a
w
0
N
Q
Q.
Z
o ~ ~ ~ E
a ~ m ~ F y
U
E ~ ~
a~
r
N M ~ ~
N
N p
~
~ CD O~ O
C
U U ~ 0)
U O U
p ~ ~ ~ N
c ~
c o •~ ~ ~ Z c
a~ c a~ o
' O a N N N O
a
~ ro
~ ~ ~ - m y
• 0 ~ Q c
~ Q2 ~1 ~ ~ U 2' m Cf Ol tL ~
U V ~ o O O E u v ~ ~ a~
E O o •o •o p~ E
~ a m ~ ~
~ a
~ o U a. d a_ 'ia U
~ ~
O' U
O I LL L.L ~ l7 O O O ~ C
O
~ '
w 'Z ~ ~ f0
~ a ~ N O 4 'y o 0 p_
0 0 a.
~, ~ KS Ol 01 U ~~ J ~ O d
N > L t L
C •
z
Q
7
U O
(n C d
~
~°
p
~ 03
~
J ~ Q
a
on >
U
a rn
~
U ~ ~ U N LL . _
O
i
~ F.u i cn H d v7 OI U `-°, in Z Z ~ ~ z z Z n
z in i
~
~ w
Q U ~ v
C
O o0 0 0 .-
_ O O O
O '" N O
O
W O Z
a U N N N N ~ ~ p O
O
O O O
O O
~ ~ tc
~~ t
~
' ~ O O O O ~ ~ ~"~ l'7 M M M M l
~
Lh ~ M
O O O O O O O O O O
O
CJ
47
9
,•
•
•
v ,. o
". ~
d N
'p ~
Q m p.
Cn N
z
O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O
I
• O O O O O O O
I O ~O
O~ N M M O 0
p N M O CV C7 N M O M O CV M O ~ O
n ^ r r t
CY r
O o m o r
n. a N
W o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N ~~ o 0 0 I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a (T N M M O ~ ^ M O N
' M N M OI to O N M O q O M q
b r M ~ r n ~
0 Q C1 O
~ N
Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
d N M M O ~ N M O N C`7 N M O O O N O q O r V
a
0 r' r M ~ r ~ r
.D O
Q d 0
7
O)
r
O
~ ,... O O
~ O N CJ
1
~ O
m O
Q O
N
h 'V til to ~' q M V q O CO h ~ r Q) ~A CT 47
q q q O C7 O O q d' N h CT to q Q) O q O 'V' h
~ Q ~ q CO q O
~ t!7 N V' ~t f~ r N q V O M M q to q O
O 67
N O q l7 ~
O m M M Ol I~ O M Q1 ~ N M M q N q q
Cn p
a S N
' N
V 1n
M C7
r N N
q Q1 q M
q h M q V M M O V ~ In N q
7 O ~ v M M O (D tt7 N m r <n N lA q
z O ~ O (D M 69
M
O C ~ ~
N EA
Q
U O N (T r h v M Q1 O O ~ M~ q O q M h t~ O ~
O
O _
N
O
~}'
f~
f~
M
V
O
~
t0
M q
O
N
to
cf
M
O
to _
J q O (O CO C7 1~ M <f CO I~ ~ M r ~ N O O M CA q ~Y'
J ~ n' O O ~ N In O fLl O q 'cf ~ q
I q O q q q
Q
~
'V' M
M O:J V CO
' f~ M V M O h
q N G) q O q O O
j ~ r q h V !~ M M to M tfi N In q ~ V O q
DQ m ~ ~ ~ ~ M q V
fH M
CF!
y 1~ O M q O Q1 N O'~ q' O CO M t!) N n M O q
O q O to O O V (P q (~ COI CP M N C1 q N h CO
p O O n N 'V' G) q M q N to N G) N <t ~ M 0 0 O
(d ~
~ 'O O
N ~
M q
~ 4'7
~+ ~
~ O
N q
n O
q O)
N N
N N
O
O O~ M
~~
T q 'ct G) q to ~~ - V
U C
Cj
~
M
N
1~
V
1~
M
M
tIJ C
r q
'~ N
r N
C ~
CO CO
'V M
'7 O
CO In
q
Q d ~ ~ M ~ M, ~ CD
r ~ CA N
W e»
~
~ ~ E
.Q o N F- s y
~ ~ ~ g o ~ v o ~ ~ z
y v v m c v fn y v U U W L'1
~
~
N
N
~ y
O O
h .`
N
•p C
O
°
N
N
rn
~ C
~
~ ~ O ~
i u
~' ~ 0 0
i ~~ ~ ~ 'm a~ Q'
c c
. N ~ ~ m t ~ m m m t ~ d .F ~ t d
U
' v
' O
O ~ u. ~ m '~
' '~
' '~
' ~ ~ ~ .-
' d W
o o o
~
~ o o E o o o o m
~ d
N c ~ >
o O
a s m a m
U a a ~ ~
~
~
~ o w
D
o
n
i4
0
o
a
c
o
0
o
Q,
v
Z
v
•
Z
•_
~
•- rn
~
.~
t t O in •j r O '~ .c° = r O i
a i
a o o. ~ ~ O
~ w p o w '~ `o 0 0 ~~ ~_ ~_ cn O `` w a
a L L Q) L L L C) Q L L L d O R O Q O fp ~ A O Q
Z m m ~ ~ 7 CT (9 N O m O n, a d O ~ L N C d 2] ~'
W U ~
Z Z cn ~i ~ Z Cn W Z Z Z N ~ (n; ~ N (n U7 C7 ~ Cn
Q V ~ ~ O O O O
o
0 M
o O M ~T ~A O M
o N O
o V
° O
o
Q
J ~ h aCi rn rn rn
N
A
n rn rn rn rn rn o N r
i r
~ n
.
W O
~
U V V 'V ~ ! C!~ ~ u~ tt~ lA CD
~ CO CD CJ CO CD
'
Q d ~
u
C7 M M M M M M M M M ('] M f
') M f7 M M M
. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL
w
Z
w
U
W
I.L
~C
G
J
LQ
r
Z
w
Q
a
w
0
r•
d
CJ
Ln
10
•
r
rl d N
O
a ~ N
(n Q m N
z
O
~ ~
N N
O O
O O
O
Q ~ N ~' (O
O
a ~ ~
Q m O
p
N
0
w
N
°' c r
N O
~ O
O ~
a
~ ~
°
Q m O
N
~"
Q
C~J N O
O O
O O
O
D. O
~ N O (O
~
Q m C~
O
r
p ....
Y O
m
a
O N
r
>
Q n °o
N
O N
N N
N
~ d
C '~
N C~
C'J m
M
z
O O ~
a p
° to
N
~"'
Q
U ~n
ti
N ,r,
n
-~ ~ 01 N ~
n ~
Q ~ ti O N
C m N
N
~
O
O O
M
N O
M
N
~'
~ T~
N
O L'7
O
C N
a Qi
~ N ~
W r
0
.
Q
U
N
O
OI
C
d
r ~
U ~.
~I
d
E N
~
~
U o
~
~
Q
O
W ~
~
d
J
Q
Z U n' °'
U ~
i O
~
~ ~ U i
~ w
(/~
N N
O
d }
~ ti
Z
d O
W ~ fY U N
°
~U ~C~
W
E-"
Z
w
MU
W
1.t.
J
d
F-
Z
w
~C
N
a
w
0
O
.-
11
•
•
~ .•. o
N Q1 N
a
o ~
¢ m
cn °
Z
O a o °o °o °o 00 00 00l 0 0 0
O~ N ,
O O N O O O N N
a
O O` m O
Q. a- N
0
{ o ° ° ° 0 ° ° 0 °
N ~ ~ ° o o• o 0 ol O o•
a O o
N O O N O O O N N ~
O m O
!~
~'•"
N
Q O .- O O O O O O O O O O
~ ~
n G' O
n. O O N O O O N N N
o~
~ ~
Q m ~
o
~ ..- o
~ Gl
a ~ N
o ~
Q °~
°o
N
O COO 6Mi O O M
I N N O
'p ~ C'7 N N QI N N N
h N
~
Gl
O
N
N
6~
K
~
~
(O
f')
l^7
1I
CV
O
0~
N
n
~
(n
Z O. •p
O ~
~ V
~
~ N
f9 M
EA O
f!?
n
O ~ n ~ ~
Q
U cD m 0 0 0 ~n ~n rn c~
0 p OM N _
OJ Q) ~ M O
J
Q ~ m
a ~ N ~
~ M ~
N M m N
~ O
.°c m o c
i~ v> u
i ~ u
i
Q ~ ~
N
~
O N_ O O W 'V G7
O m
O n M ('7 ('7 f'J 01 O (`7
~ ~ ~
" ~ O_ N O O
~ O O O
Q ~
~ ~f
~
tF~
69 N
to N
ff3 W
b9 O
~
~- G~ N
W
~ 69
0
~
~
~ •n ~ W
w
U
N
~
° ~
0 .N
Q
(n c.
v y O
~
a`;
N O
} U v d
~ ~ c
~ I
o~ ~ _
c
U Y J
-
!
Z
~ O c
~~
a0i N
cE
o
c? Q
d to
W Q
J
~ ~ ca CI iv `
rn d -~ U F.Q.
~ 0 •~
_ 3 ~ ~I Q
a~i •- nom`. ~
- Q `°
o H
O ~
cu 0
Z O U E~ ~ t~ ~ ~ 3 .n
~ ~
°'
i °a3 a c°o on oar
Q x
~
~
c n
o
° o
n 0
w 0
m 0
o 0
w
W ~ ~ C j m °o~ ~° o° ago aoo
O d ~ C7 0 0 0 0 0 0
i.L
W
F-
Z
w
U
m
Q
Q
F'-
Z
W
N~
N..
a
a
w
c
12
0
~_