The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 2642r A Resolution ~~ No ~ 6 y.Z APPROVING THE 2000-2001 CRIME CONTROL PLAN AND BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY THE DIRECTORS OF THE FORT WORTH CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT WHEREAS, on March 22 2000 the Board of Directors of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District approved its 2000 2001 Budget and WHEREAS, on May 6 2000 the voters of Fort Worth approved a five year renewal of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District by 79% of the vote NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, That the City Council through the approval of this resolution adopts the attached 2000 2001 Crime Control Plan and Budget as approved by the Directors of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District and will include this budget as a part of the City of Fort Worth Fiscal Year 2000 2001 budget when it is approved Adopted this 6th day of June 2000 AvFPR4VED f ~ ~ ~~~ C!T 1 CQ~~~~~ Mayor Kenneth Barr JUN 6 2000 ~~~~..~, CE,~ $RCFF?4Aiy A~ $3t8 C~tq of Fait SrlorFfi,'d'ex~e ~\ COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL ANO PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED PROPOSED 1995.96 1998.97 1997.1998 1998.1999 1999.2000 2000.2001 2001.2002 Violent Crime and Ganas Crime Response Teams 53,487 436 52,516,758 52,738,063 52,826,521 53,002,954 53,191,419 53,283,777 Strategic Operations Fund 429,817 332,905 303,800 397,260 480,968 559,499 587 475 Expanded Narcotics Investigation 0 228,031 526,370 565,922 610,359 681,043 662,394 Gang Graffiti Enforcement 240,708 420.454 425,470 441,827 481,624 498,337 532,506 Gang Graffiti Abatement 0 103,955 186,840 222,761 204,082 264,810 264,810 SCRAM 0 0 19y67 120.212 131.851 219.220 220.972 Sub•Total 54,157,961 53,602,103 54,200,510 54,574,503 54,911,838 55,414,328 55,551,934 Nelahborhood Crime Neighborhood Patrol Officers 51,523,982 5902,474 51,608,892 51,668.438 51,863,396 51,992,280 52,057,824 Neighbamood Policing Districts 1 199,785 1,726,293 2,329,812 2,734,285 2,834,118 3,266,411 3,357,908 ~e CODE BLUE 127,656 200,504 170,785 68,669 181,600 301,600 301,600 ` Police Storefronts 16,940 34,992 67,260 39,961 119,950 121 400 121,650 Expanded Mobile Storefronts 0 199,766 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition of Drug Houses 61,628 40,656 4,539 70,520 108,000 108,000 108,000 Parks Community Policing 0 342,153 743,473 558,700 789,206 660,529 660,529 Neighborhood Code Compliance 0 324,687 227 121 232,370 268,279 275,275 275,275 Demolition of Substandard Structures 0 0 36 211 1.083.623 0 0 0 Sub-Total 52.929.991 53,771,525 55.190,093 56,456,566 56,164,549 56,745.495 56,882.786 School Safety and Youth School Security Initiative 51,710,199 53,092,139 52,391.874 52,903,665 53,325,854 S3.598,058 53,772,374 Expanded D.A.R.E. 747,861 446,888 568,823 0 0 0 0 After School Program 0 0 0 0 0 1.400.000 1.400.000 Sub-Total 52,458,060 53,539,027 52,960.697 52,903,665 53,325,854 54,998,058 55,172,374 ..~ ovloroo 1 Version 1.3 i COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED PROPOSED 1995.96 1998.97 1997.199D 1998.1999 1999.2000 2000-2001 2001.2002 Police Department Enhancements Recruit Officer Training SO 5341,035 5792,837 51,238,192 51 179,182 51,327 434 51,021,103 Civil Service Pay Plan 3,098,355 4,393,547 4,393,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 Increased Jail Costs 0 811,750 1,404,762 811,750 1 404,750 1,577 438 1,608,986 Replacement of High Mileage Vehicles 3,466,866 2,617,794 2,808,302 3,360,118 2,975,200 3,475,200 3,475,200 Special Operations Division Vehicles 221,346 352,865 253,527 252,302 280,600 280,600 280,600 Police Cadets 0 0 0 110,621 181,290 181,290 181,290 Contingency for Salary Increase 0 0 0 0 600,000 600,000 1,200,000 Special Events Overtime 0 0 0 411,323 445,840 481,507 510,398 Technology Infrastructure 0 0 0 1,295,693 1,267,697 2,130,892 2,542,068 Modernize Police Weapons 0 0 0 0 143,000 45,000 45,000 Video Cameras Beat Patrol Vehicles 0 0 0 0 105,240 105,240 105,240 .~ bl it D C ' 0 0 0 761 1 380 0 500 000 2 500 000 2 ob ata omputers e , , , , , , Program EvaluatioNResource Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 610,000 610,000 CAD Project T sfer' 0 0 0 10,286,974 0 0 0 Prisoner T sfer Van 0 0 0 0 31,550 0 0 Reimbursement for Election Costs 0 182,975 0 0 0 0 0 Arson 8 Bomb Squad Equipment 14,526 5,987 0 0 0 0 0 Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) 174,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mobile Oata Terminal Replacement 53,524 0 0 0 0 0 0 Helicopter Replacement 0 833,974 0 0 0 0 0 9.1-1 System Improvements 257.128 135.921 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total 57,285,745 59,675,848 59,652,975 524,857,900 513.943,896 518.644,148 519.409,x32 TOTAL 516,831,757 520,588,503 522,004,275 538,792,634 528,346,137 535,802,029 537,016,526 Funds far CAO Project and Mobile Data Computer first year leases transferred to Specially Funded Capital Projects Fund during FY 1999. Lease payments nd portions of the CAD Project expenses ed during FY 2000. 02/10/00 2 Version 1.3 Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary The fiscal year 2000-2001 information represents the budget recommended by the City Council on February 1 S 2000 The Crime Control and Prevention District Board approved the fiscal year 2000-2001 budget and plan on March 22, 2000 Information on the fcscal year 2001 2002 budget is included for information purposes. On March 4 1995 the citizens of Fort Worth approved the creation of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District. The district was implemented on October 1 1995 and is due to expire on September 30 2000 The original plan and budget focused on violent cnme, particularly those involving gang activity and has over the five years of the program evolved into other areas, including cnme prevention, such as providing security at our parks and enhancing code compliance. Most of the original components of the plan are still in operation and, with adjustments, remain integral parts of the cnme prevention strategy of the Police Department. The original evaluation plan included one measure of effectiveness comparing the number of reported crimes of calendar year 2000 to 1994 While it is too soon to make a final measurement, we anticipate adouble-digit decrease, with the largest decrease occumng in the violent cnme category Through calendar year 1999 overall Part I crime is down 13 6% while violent Part I crimes, the targeted offenses in the plan, are down 29.3% As of the end of 1998, Fort Worth had the 25`~ highest cnme rate in the nation for large cities (over 250 000) compared to being 2"d in 1991 To maintain consistency in the crime prevention strategy of Fort Worth, the vision from the original plan is being carried over to the renewal plan. Mission The Fort Worth Police Department provides quallty service in partnership with the community to create a safe environment for all. Vision To make Fort Worth, Texas, the safest major city in the United States. Based upon experience gained from the first four years of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District, the mayor goals of the renewal plan are modified. The economic growth occurring throughout the community has in itself engendered sporadic peaks of property cnme negatively impacting the cnme rate Since the vision calls for comparison of the cnme rate (Part I offenses per 100 000 population) with other cities across the nation, the plan uses the crime rate, rather than raw reported crime as one of the mayor goals. Goals a. To attain a crime rate of 6,227 03 Part I crimes per 100 000 population. b To reduce the rank of Fort Worth among mayor cities to 30`h c To increase citizen participation in the CODE BLUE program. d. To support the operations of the police department through the acquisition of equipment, technology and the retention and recruitment of high quality officers e. To continue to embrace a focus on prevention by the community and the police department. Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 1 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 f. To provide a secure environment in which children can receive an educatton. Awards 1995 Weber-Seavey Award - Finaltst 199b Cnmtnal Justice Award Texas Attorney General s Office 1997 Excellence to Community Pohcmg Award National League of Cities Spectal Recognition for Crime Preventton United States Houstng Department 1998 • Bud Willoughby Award - Excellence m Poltctng Mayor Cities Chtefs Award for Program Excellence - Publtc Safety In memory of William H. Hansell Sr and Altce HanseIl International City/County Managers Assoctahon (ICMA) 1999 Finaltst Innovations to American Government Ford Foundation Medallion for Vision and Leadership Boys & Girls Clubs of America Crime Control and Prevention District. Plan Executive Summary Page 2 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 Plan & Budget Most of the components of these key areas appear m both years with some only operated dunng a single fiscal year All of these strategies are interwoven with each other and also interconnected with operattons funded through the General Revenue Fund and various grant fund sources. All components of the plan are divided into four key areas: I. Vtolent Cnme and Gangs II. Neighborhood Creme III. School Safety and Youth N Police Enhancements The component descriptions below are by area and provide the proposed budgets for both Fiscal Years 2000-2001 and 2001 2002 I Violent Crime and Gangs • Crime Response Teams Gang-related violent crime was a mayor issue m 1994 and a mayor reason for the implementation of Zero Tolerance Teams. With the implementation of this and the Comin Up gang intervention program, violent gang crimes have fallen dramatically and gang related homtctdes dropped from a high of 24 to dust single digits in the past few years. The role of Zero Tolerance teams has expanded to other violent cremes and it is planned m the future that they be used to target any emerging creme trend affecting Part I crimes. This has led to changing the name of the unit to Crime Response Teams. Each team consists of 10 officers, one detective, • and a sergeant and is assigned to each of the Field Operations Divisions, for a total of 48 positions. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $3 191 419 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $3,283 777 Strategic Operations Fund The Strategic Operations Fund continues to be used by divistons of the Field Operations Bureau and the Special Services Bureau to target particular outbreaks of cnmtnal activity Pnor to the use of the funds, the supervisor of the unit wanting to use the overttme funds develops a plan. An assessment is completed once the operation is completed. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $559 499 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $587 475 • Expansion of Narcotics Unit This coin onent was added durin the second year of the first Fort Worth Cnme Control and Prevention P g Distract and added 10 detective positions and lease cars to the Special Operations Division. It has ¢ successfully lowered the response time to ttps and/or complaints from citizens regarding narcotics problems from several days to one day Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $681 043 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $662,394 • Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 3 of 10 Rev 2.l 4/06/00 • Gang Graffiti Enforcement This program was added to the District during the second year and consists of eight police officers assigned to the Special Operations Division. They generally are assigned as atwo-officer team operating in each of the four Field Operations Divisions to identify and attempt to apprehend graffiti offenders and `taggers. They have made a number of arrests and have been involved in the significant reduction of graffiti. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $498,337 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $532,506 • Gang Graffiti Abatement A companion component to the Gang Graffiti Enforcement program, this is operated by the Parks and Community Services department and targets the removal of all graffiti in the city This project operates a paint bank and has contract funds for high-tech removal of graffiti from complex structures. Two civilian employees are included in this component. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $264,810 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $264 810 • SCRAM The police department received partial funding through a state grant to initiate a sex offender registration unit in 1998 A proposal was made to the District to receive additional funds to implement a comprehensive unit, titled the Sex Cnmes Registration Apprehension and Monrtonng Unrt (SCRAM) This umt handles the registration of all sex offenders, publishes the required advertisements, collects intelligence data, monitors compliance by offenders and makes arrests when necessary Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $219,220 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $220,972 II Neighborhood Crime • Neighborhood Patrol Officers (NPOs) Phase I of the Fort Worth Cnrrie Control and Prevention District increased the number of Neighborhood Police Officers by 14 to at total of 89 At that time a federal Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grant funded 20 positions At the expiration of that grant the cost of these positions was moved to the District, bringing the total to 34 positions funded by the District. The total number of NPOs is currently 90 Some of these are assigned to beats as the pnncipal NPO• others are assigned to special areas such as housing communities, parks and universities They also provide assistance with mobile storefronts. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $1,992,280 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $2,057,824 Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 4 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 • Neighborhood Policing Districts The Neighborhood Policing District concept was initiated in the Weed & Seed grant and later expanded with a combination of Crime Control and Prevention District, grant, and general revenue funds. There are currently 12 neighborhood Policing Districts, with 7 housed in leased facilities, 4 located at city-owned Field Operations Division headquarters and 1 sharing a city building with the Traffic Division. This component includes funds for 7 leases and related expenses, including utilities, maintenance, etc It also provides salaries and benefits for 21 positions, including 13 sworn officers and 8 clerical support personnel. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $3,286,411 Fiscal. Year 2001 2002 Budget: $3,357,908 • CODE BLUE Provides operating funds for the Citizens on Patrol program, including the purchase of 80 portable radios in each of the next two years, gasoline reimbursement, caps, windbreakers, signs, and other operating costs. Combined with purchases in previous years this will result in more than 600 portable radios for the program. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 $301 600 Fiscal Year 2001 2002. $301 600 • Police Storefronts The police department currently has more than 25 police storefronts scattered throughout the city These are generally small office areas provided to the city at no or low cost by a landlord and are sometimes utilized by Neighborhood Police Officers and beat officers to complete paperwork and to assist the public with community problems. Some CODE BLUE groups also utilize this space Funds are included in this component for utilities, supplies and other operating costs. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 $121 400 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 $121 650 • Demolition of Drug Houses Initially this project was conceived to eliminate the prototypical crack" house, a residence remade into a fortified structure that sold crack cocaine like fast food. These facilities have largely disappeared and been replaced with less recognizable drug houses that sell a variety of illegal substances. They often use abandoned houses or leased substandard structures. After these locations are identified and law enforcement action is taken a list is compiled of structures that qualify for demolition. This component will provide funds to process the paperwork required for demolition and pay for the materials, equipment, and personnel required. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $108 000 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $108 000 • Parks Community Policing This component funds security for citizens utilizing Parks and Community Services facilities. This includes a mix of off-duty police officers and private security at selected locations. The project has been highly Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 5 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 successful, with almost no violent acts reported at community facilities in the past year and an extremely low amount of crime at parks throughout the city Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $660,529 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $660,529 • Neighborhood Code Compliance This program supports five code compliance officers and an office assistant who work closely with the police department to respond to code violations that contribute to blight in neighborhoods. Neighborhood deterioration can be a contributing factor to crime in neighborhoods. This program allows a focused response to this problem. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $275,275 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $275,275 II1 School Safety and Youth • School Security Initiative The Fort Worth Police Department and the Fort Worth Independent School District have long been partners in the effort to provide a safe environment for education. The School Secunty Initiative was launched with the original Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District and superseded the School Liaison program that began in 1968 The School Secunty Initiative is headed by a Police Lieutenant and currently has 51 sworn officers assigned. Personnel costs are shared with school districts on a 50/50 basis. The program also includes the Keller Crowley and Everman districts, which have eligible schools within the Fort Worth city limits. Utilizing a federal Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grant the department will soon begin placing a limited number of officers in elementary schools to augment this program. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $3,598,058 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $3 772,374 After School Program National research conducted during the past 5 years has recognized that adolescents are at a higher risk being crime victims or committing a criminal act during the hours of 3.OOpm to 6 OOpm on a school day than at any other time. The primary response to this situation has been the creation and/or expansion of a variety of after school, ornon-school hour programs. Amulti-disciplinary task force consisting of city officials, school district personnel, and related service providers have conducted extensive research on this situation and developed a plan to implement a coordinated program in schools throughout the city that have documented juvenile crime problems. This program supplements and does not supplant existing programs and will include a myriad of activities, mcludfng academics, arts, athletics, and other programs designed to be interesting to young people. This is a new project for Phase II of the District and is proposed to be operated at least during the first tvvo years. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $1 400 000 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $1 400 000 • Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 6 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 IV Police Department Enhancements • Recruit Officer Training Approximately nine to ten months is required to fully train and outfit a new police officer to work in the field. All Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention Disfict components consist of experienced personnel, most of whom have been transferred from the Field Operations Bureau, which has the patrol function. The transfer of these officers can have a detrimental effect upon the patrol function unless a `pipeline of replacement personnel is maintained. The police department conducts continuous personnel turnover analyses to determine the number of recruit personnel needed to avoid personnel shortages and to ensure that all Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention Distract components remain fully staffed. For the latter reason, all costs for personnel training were moved to the District during the third year of Phase I. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $1,327 434 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $1 021 103 • Civil Service Pay Plan Prior to the implementation of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District in 1995 pay Ievels in the Fort Worth Police Department as compared to other agencies within the area had fallen so low it was becoming difficult to attract quality recruits and to retain experienced officers One of the problems was that step raises ceased after 4 years of experience, leaving promotions or cost of living increases the only possibility of a raise The pay plan extended 5% scheduled raises for every four years, up to 20 years of service. This component funds the pay schedule raises previously given and those scheduled during the next 24 months. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $5,329,547 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $5,329,547 • Increased Jail Costs The Fort Worth Police Department does not operate a local ail and instead contracts with the Tarrant County Sheriff's Department for these services. This service began in 1985 and the program has been in continuous utilization since then with modifications as to daily costs. During the third year of the original District this component was added to assist in increases due to higher arrest rates by Fort Worth Cnme Control and Prevention District funded entities and other incremental increases. It is projected that total fiscal year~ail costs will be $2,266,505 which is based upon the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sent to the Tarrant County Sheriff s Department. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $1,577 438 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $1 608,986 • Replacement of High Mileage Vehicles Prior to the implementation of the Fort Worth Cnme Control and Prevention District in 1995 it was the rule and not the exception, that the Fort Worth Police Department fleet would have a significant number of police vehicles with more than 100,000 miles. This included the patrol fleet and was becoming a safety hazard. The Police Department formulated a vehicle replacement plan for the original District that would allow the modernization of the fleet over afive-year period. This plan was revised in 1998, and is now producing results, with no assigned beat car having more than 50,000 miles in the past year To maintain this plan it is necessary to consistently purchase fleet replacement vehicles and move higher mileage cars to units that have Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 7 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 less demanding operational needs. A total of 133 vehicles are proposed to be purchased during fiscal year 2000-2001 with the majority being full-sized marked patrol sedans. There will also be purchases of mid- sized unmarked cars and specialized vehicles, including motorcycles, vans, and pickup trucks. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $3 475,200 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $3 475,200 • Special Operations Division Vehicles The Special Operations Division includes the Narcotics Section and other units that must utilize `undercover" vehicles. In order to maximize the effectiveness of the unit, a lease system for 30 vehicles has been established which allows the rotation of cars when drug dealers identify them. Operating costs and maintenance are also included in this component. This is a continuation project from the inception of the District. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $280 600 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $280 600 • Police Cadets The Police Cadet program provides funds to hire college students who are interested in becoming a Fort Worth police officer They are paid a salary provided a uniform, and placed wrthm different divisions of the department. Accommodations are made for class schedules. Even though the program is relatively new several cadets have entered the basic police academy Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $181,290 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $181,290 • Contingency for Salary Increase This component includes funds for cost of living salary increases approved by the City of Fort Worth. This program is only used to fund increases for the personnel paid through the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District and represents an estimate The higher figure during the second fiscal year represents any raise from the previous year plus any possible additional salary increase If all of the funds are not used, they are returned to the district fund balance. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $600 000 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $1,200 000 • Special Events Overtime The growing number of special events within the city began to place a strain on the police department budget, particularly following the opening of the Texas Motor Speedway This component provides funds for officers to conduct outside security including traffic control, at all special events Past events have included all functions at the Texas Motor Speedway Bass Hall performances, parades, etc It does not include inside security which is paid by the enterprise holding the event. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $481,507 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $510,398 Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 8 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 • Technology Infrastructure Dunng fiscal year 1998-99 year 4 of the District, the police department became part of the citywide local area network. This project, dubbed Technology Infrastructure, provided for wiring at all police facilities, computer servers, support equipment, and the lease of over 500 personal computers. The system allows for collaboration on information, email, and controlled Internet access. The department chose to lease personal computers rather than purchase after a comprehensive lease/purchase analysts. This approach saved money and allowed the ability to stay current with the latest improvements of technology Thts component continues the leases necessary to operate the network, but also adds $913 024 in new funding to make badly needed tmprovements. Included are the development of a new mug shot system to allow access and printing by all law enforcement personnel at all facilities; hiring a professional firm to design a new data management system, purchasing an imaging system to capture accident reports making it easier for the public to purchase copies; purchasing of a new fingerprint scanning computer and obtaining equipment and training to gain national accreditation for the Crime Laboratory Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $2,130 892 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $2,542,068 • Modernize Police Weapons For the past three years the Fort Worth Police Departments has issued state-of--the-art semi-automatic pistols (Beretta 40 caliber) to all officers from the police academy rather than the six-shot revolver that was used for 50 years. In the final year of the original district funds were used to begin replacement of all officers issued service weapon. This component allows continuation of the program. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $45 000 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $45 000 • Video Cameras in Beat Patrol Vehicles This began as a four year project during fiscal year 1999-2000 and will be included in the first three years of Phase II of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District. Dash mount video cameras will be installed in patrol officer beat cars and supervisor vehicles, a total of 96 cars. They will be used for documentation and evidentiary purposes and activated during pursuits, vehicle stops, arrests, and while following persons suspected of driving while intoxicated. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $105,240 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $105,240 • Mobile Data Computers During the first year of the Fort Worth Cnme Control and Prevention District funds were included to conduct a study of the mobile data system that had been in use for almost 10 years and to recommend a new system. This was combined with a project to implement a new computer-aided dispatch system for both the Fire and Police Departments. Dunng the interim period funds were expended to purchase used terminals for the existing system for new vehicles and to replace broken machines. After a complex selection process, vendors began implementation of the new system during the last calendar quarter of 1999 with full CAD implementation scheduled for December 2000 Additional components will become operational during 2001 Extensive tests were conducted on a variety of mobile data computers and selected patrol officers reviewed the proposed devices and a model was selected. After discussions among police staff, computer professionals and vendors it was determined to be far more cost effective in the long run to lease the devices. Tlus Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 9 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 cflmponent includes funds to continue the lease on all current devices, allows for some expansion, and includes maintenance and licensing costs for associated software. These devices allow officers to quickly query a variety of databases and will soon allow officers to complete reports in the field. Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $2,500,000 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $2,500 000 • Program Evaluation/Resource Analysis Tie poltce department has implemented a number of changes over the past decade, many of them through the Fort Worth Crime Control and Preventton Dtstnct and others through local and grant funding. While thts has resulted in a 52% reduction in cnme, there is always the need for review analysis and improvements The police department conducted a resource deployment analysts of the patrol staffing last year using a limited number of m-house personnel and computer resources. The Fort Worth Police Officers Assoctatton has suggested that a more comprehensive study of patrol resources be undertaken. Thts study will be coupled with the initial phase of a complete study of the department. This project will of necessity be completed in conjunction with the data management planning project funded under technology improvements. This study uvill provide information needed by the City to ensure the most effective means of service delivery while rnaintatntng a community policing stance. It will also, once a new data management system is in place, allow commanders access to decision support software which will allow precise deployment of personnel resources and the abiltty to qutckly react to sttuational changes in the community Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget: $610 000 Fiscal Year 2001 2002 Budget: $610 000 Port Worth Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Summation Piscal Year 2000-2001 Budget Piscal Year 2001-2002 Budget Authorized Positions FY 2000-2001 Authorized Positions FY 2001-2002 $35,802,029 $37,016,526 184 186 Crime Control and Prevention District Plan Executive Summary Page 10 of 10 Rev 2.1 4/06/00 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT 1999-2000 ADOPTED $28 346 137 A.P 182 2000-2001 PROPOSED $35 802 029 A.P 184 A) The proposed budget includes the addition of two School Security Initiative officers and vehicles With the addition of schools within the Fort Worth city limits the need for on-site officers continues to increase Half of the salary expense of these officers will be reimbursed by the beneficiary school district. The total expense for the first year is budgeted at $174 315 Currently additional schools are staffed by officers on loan from the General Fund B) The proposed budget includes $2,500 000 for Mobile Data Computer leases and maintenance Funds totaling $12 048 354 including year one leasing costs were transferred out of the Crime Control and Prevention District Fund to the Specially Funded Capital Projects Fund during FY1999 Therefore, operating expenses for this project during FY1999-2000 were incurred in the Specially Funded Capital Projects Fund and not reflected in the Crime Control and Prevention District operating budget. C) The proposed budget includes $913 024 in technology enhancements to the existing Network Infrastructure The solutions will respond to records management issues information availability . to citizens officer efficiency and training Projects include a new mug shot system live-scan fingerprint system an accident report imaging system, and a records management consulting project. In addition funding is included for crime lab improvements necessary to achieve accreditation The changes should increase prosecution and conviction rates This increase is offset by a $49 829 reduction in one-time GIS expenses D) The proposed budget reflects $803,240 across all programs for salary increases and step raises of Crime Control and Prevention District sworn personnel Increases occurred in base salaries overtime shift differentials and retirement as a result. E) Funding totaling $1 400 000 for the development and implementation of an After School Program in collaboration with schools in Fort Worth is included in the proposed budget. F) The proposed budget includes $610 000 for the evaluation of all Crime Control and Prevention District programs as well as a resource and staffing analysis of the entire department. These studies will be conducted by an outside consultant and should ensure the continuing good stewardship of the funds available to the Police Department. G) An increase of $500 000 for Replacement of High-Mileage Vehicles is included Now that the Police Department has successfully improved the condition of the patrol fleet vehicles other areas of the fleet require attention ~J 02/10/00 Version 1.3 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES CRIME CONTROL 8~ PREVENTION DISTRICT 1999-2000 ADOPTED $28 346 137 2000-2001 PROPOSED $35 802,029 A.P 182 A. P 184 H) The proposed budget includes $172,688 in Increased Jail Costs. During the summer of 1999 a memorandum of understanding was developed with the County requiring the City of Fort Worth to budget 2% growth from prior-year payments beginning with the 1997-98 contract year As a result, we paid back $128 537 Because the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget was already adopted funds were not included in the fiscal year 2000 budget for the increase. Therefore, the current proposed budget includes the $128 537 plus an additional 2% increase for FY2000-2001 I) Funds totaling $148,251 were added to Recruit Officer Training for recruit salary increases that were approved during FY1999 after the FY2000 Crime Control and Prevention District budget was adopted J) The proposed budget includes an increase in CODE BLUE funding to purchase radios for citizen patrollers search teams and reserve officers The Police Department will purchase 80 radios per year over two years in order to provide adequate equipment to these valued volunteer resources Funds of $120 000 are budgeted annually for this expenditure K) The proposed budget includes an increase of $80 000 for the SCRAM program for sex offender notification requirements Due to the increases in advertising costs as well as potential increases in the notification requirements additional funding is necessary L) An increase of $50 000 is included in contract Gang Graffiti Abatement in order to provide year round paint matching services and reduce the negative impact of graffiti on the community M) A reduction of $31 550 is included for the one-time purchase of a Prisoner Van for the Marshalls. N) A decrease of $128 677 in Park Security is budgeted to more accurately reflect actual spending in previous years The Police Department and Parks and Community Services Department are working together to maximize the effectiveness of officer and private security assignments 02/10/00 Version 1.3 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT-POLICE GR79/0351000'0357301 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL REPONSIBILITIES The Police Department, under the direction of the Chief of Police develops and implements programs to deter crime and enforce traffic laws in order to protect life and property within the City of Fort Worth Specific departmental responsibilities include crime prevention the apprehension of persons suspected of committing crimes recovery of stolen property and regulation of non-criminal conduct such as traffic enforcement Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Proposed Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001 2002 Personal Services $11 640 616 $12 952 181 $14 438,312 $15,242,074 Supplies 1 649 014 754 042. 647 407 606 913 Contractual Services 21 075,251 10 474,247 15 519 072 15 549 125 Capital Outlay 3 413 922 2,904 100 3 996 624 4 417 800 Total Allocations $37 778 803 $27 084 570 $34 601 415 $35 815 912 Authorized Positions 169 0 174.0 176 0 178 0 02/10/00 Version 1.3 • DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT GR79/0214002 CITY SERVICES SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL REPONSIBILITIES The City Services Department consists of three operating divisions Code Compliance Division responsible for protecting and improving the quality of life in the City by enforcing the City's environmental codes Equipment Services Division responsible for maintaining the City's vehicular and equipment fleet; and Solid Waste Management, responsible for collection and disposal of solid waste for the general public. Only the Code Compliance Division of City Services is represented in the Crime Control and Prevention District. The Code Compliance Division promotes and enforces the environmental code of the City through inspection of neighborhoods and buildings Public relations and educational programs are integral parts of an effort to reduce the need for a primary focus on enforcement; however legal action to enforce the City code is initiated when necessary Enforcement of environmental codes is an invaluable tool in crime prevention because of the relationship between neighborhood deterioration and high incidences of criminal activity Code enforcement activity often helps in criminal investigations particularly at locations involved in drugs and stolen vehicles and will contribute to an overall reduction of the crime rate and citizen fear of crime Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Proposed Budget Allocations 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 Personal Services $198 579 $196,236 $203,232 $203,232 Supplies 22 489 33 888 33,888 33 888 Contractual Services 11 302 38 155 38 155 38 155 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $232,370 $268,279 $275,275 $275,275 Authorized Positions 6 0 6.0 6 0 6 0 02/10/00 Version 1.3 t- DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT GR79 / 0800511 0808080 PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL REPONSIBILITIES The Parks and Community Services Department is responsible for planning designing developing and maintaining the City's network of parks as well as for the planning and administration of various recreation and human services programs that the City offers Parks and Community policing and security and graffiti abatement are integral parts of crime control and. prevention While aggressive law enforcement activity is an obvious need in making Fort Worth the safest large city in the United States this alone does not ensure that Fort Worth wilt remain afirst-class city It is important that the public also have available quality of life amenities including libraries entertainment, and parks People will use these amenities particularly the parks only if they feel safe in them Graffiti if left unabated breeds even more graffiti and potential violent conflict among the gangs that spread it. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Propos ed Budget Allocations 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 20012002 Personal Services $470 941 $624 017 $502,840 $502,840 Supplies 4,345 8 330 8,330 8,330 Contractual Services 286,209 360 941 414 169 414 169 Capital Outlay 19 966 0 0 0 Total Allocations $781 461 $993,288 $925 339 $925 339 Authorized Positions 2.0 2 0 2 0 2.0 oti~oioo Version 1.3 ~i CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 REVENUES. Sales Tax Collections $34 670,863 School Security Initiative Support Fort Worth Independent School District $1 533 709 Keller Independent School District 61 083 Everman Independent School District 25,579 Crowley Independent School District 25,579 TOTAL SCHOOL SECURITY INITIATIVE SUPPORT $1 645,950 DEMOLITION CONTINGENCY FUND 1 080 040 FUND BALANCE SAVINGS 257,816 TOTAL REVENUES $37 654 669 EXPENDITURES. Personal Services $15 144 384 Supplies 689 625 Contractual Services 15,971,396 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENSES $31 805 405 Capital Outlay $3.996,624 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $35 802,029 UNPROGRAMMED FUNDS 1 852,640 • 02/10/00 Version 1.3 6 .a CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2001 2002 REVENUES. Sales Tax Collections $36 057,697 School Security Initiative Support Fort Worth Independent School District $1 620,866 Keller Independent School District 61,083 Everman Independent School District 25 579 Crowley Independent School District 25,579 TOTAL SCHOOL SECURITY INITIATIVE SUPPORT $1 733 107 UNPROGRAMMED FUND BALANCE $1,852,640 TOTAL REVENUES $39 643 444 EXPENDITURES. Personal Services $15 948 146 Supplies 649 131 Contractual Services 16,001,449 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENSES $32 598 726 Capital Outlay $4,417,800 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $37 016 526 UNPROGRAMMED FUNDS $2,626 918 • ov~oioo Version 1.3 • • COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 1895-1896 1898.1997 1997.1898 1998.1999 1999.2000 PROPOSED PROPOSED 2000.2001 2001.2002 Sales Tax Collections 823,657,510 $26,602,501 $29,398,031 531,334,070 $33,337,368 $34,670,863 $36,057,697 School Security Initiative Support Fort Worth Ind. School District $657,786 $810,412 $936,252 81 156,985 $1,383,609 $1,533,709 $1,620,866 Keller Ind. School District 0 0 0 0 55,431 61,083 61,083 Everman Ind. School District 0 0 0 0 0 25,579 25,579 Crowley Ind. Schooi District 0 0 0 0 0 25.579 25.579 Sub•tatal $657,786 $810,412 $936,252 $1156,985 $1439,040 $1,645,950 $1,733,107 TOTAL $24,315,296 $27 412,913 $30,334,283 532,491,055 534,776,408 $36,316,813 $37,790,804 02/10!00 Version 1.3 8 e • ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° y O C C C l 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N O C O C M N CV N ~ M N C`7 O C O n ~ r . - • ~ m O d N z O .a r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d N O O O l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ N O O O O O ~ ~ fV N ~ M N M O O O a ° o a o ` m o0 . N 0 N °o °o °o °o °o °o I °0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 O O ~ ~ o • O O O • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N O OII O O O M ~ N fV ~ M N ri 0 0 0 O 7 rn v Q m ~ t"' r Q ~ ~ O O O O O O p p O O O O O O O O O O O ~ N O) O O I O O O O O O O O O O O D_ .~ r O O O O O O ~ ~ N CV T M CV C7 O O O ~ O ~ Q LL] Q) O ~ fD ~ W M O~ O O O O N ~ ~ N n ~ N M O ~ ~ N '7 tt7 to to l0 M ~ N M W O f7 O • O M O M to t0 O O~ N N O) W O~ O W W tsi h ~ W W ~ W CO a W M M Q. O j r N ~ O ~ a ~ (OD ~ M ~ ~ N ti M M ~ W N N d m 00 N ~ r W N N b9 ~ 69 C9 ' CO O ~ ~ O ~ O W W O t0 W n O tf) O t!•) M M O O p N ~ ~ N ~ O M ~ M V W 00 W M h W O st ~' O CO lC) f CD U7 M M M M O '~ N 0 W O n n ~ ~ f z O ~ ~ O ( 0 N ~ r ~ N to ti N ~ ~ N r M M ~ ~ N m p _ r ~' n b9 N O °- N ,~ ,~, ~+ ~ I'"' Q O O 0 a ~ ~ lO CO M r W ti N M ~ N N O O ~ O v ( 0 r N ~ 1~ n rn 01 M ~ M N W O M 00 ao C7 M M O CO W N CO N In Q) J d O N _ W (~D N W 1N Q p a r N 41 V N d' C7 O O O Q ' U r ~ d' ~ O ~ M N C^O M M V CO CO r 'O Q m O O O ~ r ~ r V~ C9 t9 N ~ Q7 ~ N J b09 n N N N ' ' 'W U) C tD I~ 1~ ~ r _ ~ O~ (O (O r ( p N ~ N ~ O ~ V N ~ r a0 N 7 00 ~ M O CO M O f~ t~ tD ~ f9 O ~ ~ O 'mot M W C'7 CO W M 1 O CO M r, r W h r CO L(7 N tf 0 0 M (n U ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 1 W W ~ fW0 tCOD N N W M N R r ~ M Q C1 (n N W N ~ ~ ~ N O 7 O. d ` r N V f0 I~ L y ~ N U U U U U Z W O ~ V ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~. N ~ N V 7 7 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ m ~ y ~ y L7 C C ~ ~ ~ U v v v U U N C H C ° _U ~ ~ a O m N ~j N m N O O O O O ~ ~ ~ N Z d ~ U C C d d Q. 4. d N f9 O) N • ~ t/1 N , O O C 'O L C ~ 'O V y y O ~ ~ w U ° ~ ° ~ ~ ~ °o °o o °o °o o° On ~ n. a i ~ ~ ~ a ~ N ~ L to L r L C= I- 0 ~ «S d N O~ ~ U ~ J ° O D. O O O > O O O U ai U •rn O o d c • O a a O a a a z U ~ ~ ~ ~ c • ~ • a E E a v v ~ rn rn ~ rn rn rn ~ m ~ W U x N ii a~ ~ ~ o ° •o •c _ •~ ~ d m o 'm •a~ , m 'm 'd 'a~ ~ ~ o ~ w p cn f- a ~ a U ~ ~ ii, ii z z z w z z z cn to <n ~ W V ~ O O O O O 0 r 0' O ~ O ~ O O O O N O O r M ~7 O O O O d ~ ti m ~ ~ V' j 4 u 7 M ~ _ ` N N N N CO C O J ~ ~ ~ u •~ ~ t[j ~c ~i u a u`xi ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ v`ri W 0 ~ ~ V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a ~ c9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . li. W Z W MU W {.i. G J Q Z w Q a w 0 • ~ N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q ~ N N M N M M O O O O N O CO O O In In 00 n 7 r r r r N M 0 T O CD O ~ a' N Z O ~ r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O I O O O O O ~~ N ~ M N M M O O O O CV O ~ N C ~ ~ t O n r r r ^ r ~ ~ m O O a d N W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N ~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV r M CV r M M O O C7 O O CV C r W O ('V O r !p r lA ~ O O . Q m ~ ~ ~ r Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ .. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 4: N 01 ~ CV CM fV M M O O C7 O N O 00 O O fD (O ~ n r r O r N V ~ t0 ~ O m 001 Q Q7 r 01 00 h 00 O O N 0 N tt (O i~ 0 ~ N N -0 N 0 N ~ r Q1 O 01 to CO 1~ Q1 O 0 01 h I~ _ O CO ~ M r O (') (D st sf O C7 In C7 M M 1~ Q1 y O O O O N M ~' 0 O 0 M O C7 O O N N r O N N l0 0 n ~ <!' ~ 01 _ st V M OJ 01 N to M t!') N N (0 CD M In to ~ l!') 1~ r 0 N 0 O` O 67 O 01 69 r ~ M ~ t1') d N b9 69 to M fg h d' (O O N M O n O M n r I~ 0 0 0 ~ h f7 h f~ M r GO N O M M O (0 N 00 ~ V N N ~ O M M Q1 O O l1') lA O (O In r sf O O p O O N lA 0 N O O ~ N 00 O) ~ N I~ 0 O ~ d ~ N p ~ t~ Cp V' N Q1 O d' M M 1~ GO r h N N 0 N O~ 0 O V N Q1 0 et 61 to f~ O O CO O` m ~ ~ !A M ~ M O a N to ~ H Q () Q1 O V a f0 N f0 00 f0 O V O O V a O Q 0 N M M ~ CO 01 V ~ r c0 N to In c0 st N N O 0 0 M N f0 (D O ~ 07 O N O CD n In ~ .O N N 0 O (O m N a0 ~ N W M O h ~A 0 'c! 01 n 0 N m m ~ 0 ~ M CO 4'1 N O M _ CO N V N n 0 Q ~ O M 0 f 7 M M tf1 ~ r (p cr n sf M f~ O m ~ ~ 69 M ~ N Q ER b9 y O O CO M O Q1 O m N N n O M tl ) CO M y O N M O ~ 0 N ' O n N N N Q) N (0 00 O O O O M 0 V X1 7 tl7 O N N Q1 0 r M (O 0? d0 f0 « 7~ D1 T" D) 00 O O N 0 0 O O O 0 of O lf') 0 N N O N In O '~Y O U'1 r M O V 0 1~ fD V 00 M M to ~ r O ~ 1n ~ Q1 M 1~ Q d ~ !~ ~ ~ r EA M N c`') 69 f~ M x W r tA n = ° . c ~ o ~ Z U U ~ ~ ~ U N ` y ` Vf 'O 0 O fa ~ ~ ~ j ~ 01 C ~ m ~ ~ U m 'U 'V 'V y p y p j f~ ~ 0] C ~ > 'c W O d d d ° c c~ c~ a~ m - ~ .?~ U ~ C ~ O C p O O a n U_ Z V Z f9 y '- ~ fn ~ ~ J m ~ y t !~ t L O O m v~ d w a O ~ `~ of o > W y O a ~ O a° O a° n o~ v~ =°• ~ ~ ~ 'O OI y 01 Ql f N w U a~ = o a~ o 'd m ` t0 L ~ N d a U N n C m d ~ N n L u d n O ~ U ii N Z ~ Z Z in to to to cn N ~ C7 cn O to to to I- W O 0 O 0 M O r O M O r O O Q U y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q J ~ ~ 1~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 01 ~ 01 ~ Q1 ~ f0 ~ t0 ~ O tO r ~ M ~ M o n' M ~ Q. Z a i M M M i M i M M ~ t1 M n M M M i tl (") ~u 1 M ~ r1 M W O ~ (~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a. ~ C~ LwL 1~" Z w m Q J Q Z cw NC I.f. Q a w 0 r O r O O a o ~ ;, N°o o g ~ O a ~ N t0 ~ ~ O m Z Q' N Q }" D r y N O O ~°0' O (n O ~ N l0 O d o ' o ci m o N w N O ~ m °o O ° o Q ~ a ~ ~ -o ~ m ce 2 ~ Q m ° h- Q a> aai m ~ a ° °' o ~ °o ~ ~ rn cp Q m rn ~ N O N ~ N ~ C u p 01 p m ~ lf) N N O L1. F9 _~ N J .. ~ h ~ O° ^ n ~ N Z O N O ~ ° N N r ~ 4. m ° cv cQ N U O O rn ~ ~ .1 Q ~ ~f N O j ~ O N N ~ ' Q m ~ r 6N9 ~ ~ < M O M 0 O 7 ~ U C pp N ~ M N Q Q. ~ N ~ 41 i 0 . a . ` ~ o ' a~ ~ c d U ~ d ~ c ~ _o U ~ Q O ~ C ~ '~ W ~' Q z~ n. ~ o ~ ~ ~ U V ~ ~ F-- W ~ U Q~- p ~ °= ~ °o v . ' Z ' N W ~ Q ~ U ° OU u .C~ u d a LL C r~ o ~- O O O '~, o • ~, ~ c o °o °o °o °o o°I °o o° °o O O~ N O O (V C O C N fV O O ~ ~ (n ~ m d O N z O ~ r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D N O O N O 0 0 CV CV V ~ a ~ m ~ W d d N W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 N _ a o 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 4? O a •p O ~ O C CV O O O CV CV (V O O O Q m ~ Q ~ m O O O O O O) O O O 4: N O ~ O O N O O O N N n O ~ ~ Q m O O t0 00 O O O ~ to p O ~ N O O M OO N _ O~ M Q1 V h M M N ~ ~ O On ~ O N N O V M V CO M M 00 O t(y N (p d m o ~ efl ~ ~ ~ 0 N ~ t0 p 00 O O O tC) J t[7 O O ~ p C s) N 00 O N M O O N 'O N r M ~ ~ z p m ~ ~ !A ~ N b9 N EH 69 ~ O n' N 6M9 Q (~ r 00 N O ~f9 N O O n Q ~ ~ N CO N O O O 11') C M (O CO 00 f~ 00 N ~ J y N O N CD '7 M ~f M h M O N N M CO Q O -j ~ N M Q1 M Q m O N !R ~ N m ~ ~ ~ O O O 00 ~f7 sf f0 7~ ~ U7 O N r M 00 ~ Q y ~ ~ ~ 69 to 6r9 ~ O ~ W 0 W a ~ ~ U o O Q '~ U O ~ Q W O ~ Q W N c ~ o Y D V v • d. c m c J ~ aZi ~ ~ c ° ~ U Q to Q v~ o ~' ~ ~ a~ a~ i ~ ~ a j w U ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ` , p ~ 3 v ~ r Q a c~ ~ ¢ =° ° p w ~ O a U ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U U ~ c°n m° z° C7 >°- Q = to ~ ~ Q Y ~' ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ Z • o o p ° ° ° W a ~ V a o a o a o a o w m o a . u C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 w H Z w U m Q J Q H Z w NG I.L. Q a w 0 o o c 0 0 a ~~ o >