HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2659A Resolution
No z~s'9
APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2000-01
TARRANT COUNTY 9-1 1 DISTRICT BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Tarrant County 9 1 1 Emergency Assistance District Board of
Managers have approved the attached Budget and recommends that the Crty of Fort Worth
approve the same for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1 2000 for the purposes set forth
in the Budget and
WHEREAS, the Budget is considered to be sufficient to maintain and operate the
district and allow full participation by the city of Fort Worth, and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that no city tax revenues nor an increased monthly per
line fee from Fort Worth telephone customers will be required to carry out the District s
functions in the coming year
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the budget for the Tarrant County
9 1 1 Emergency Assistance District for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1 2000 and
ending September 30 2001 is hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Fort
Worth.
BE IT FURTHER RESLOVED that this resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its passage
Adopted this .2.2 day of _ 2000
--- APPROVED
CITY COUNCIL
AUG ~~ 2000
L ~;~a.~,
r.~f~ Socxaf~ary~ ~r ~o
~~. ~ .~r~~ Ci2p of I'oxs Wax2h, Texas
~~~~ n~ ~~~~ ~~~~~
FOT OT~I
R ~
,~_
Date August 17 2000
TO The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM Charles Boswell Assistant City Manager ~~ J~~
SUBJECT Approval of the Proposed Tarrant County 9-1 1 District Budget for
FY 2000-01
Please find attached a copy of the Tarrant County 9 1 .1 District Proposed Operating
Budget for Fiscal Year 2000-01 and the Resolution for approval at the City Council
meeting on August 22, 2000 This budget was presented to the Governmental Relations
Committee meeting on August 8 2000
The primary changes reflected in this budget including funding for upgrades to call centers
including built m redundancy completion of YZK compliance programs and an implementation
of a three phase program to provide 911 location information for wireless customers.
Mr Bill Munn, Executive Director will be present to answer any questions at the Council
meeting on August 22, 2000 when City Council will be ask to adopt a resolution approving the
budget for the District.
The staff suggests the Clty Council approve the attached Resolution and Proposed District
Budget. If you have any questions please contact Paul Sweitzer at 871-8507
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
THE CITY OF FORT WORTH * 1000 THROCKMORTON STREET * FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102
(817) 871-6111 * Fax (817) 871-6134
~^~ Printed cycled paper
TARRANT COiJNTY 9-1-1 DISTRICT
2000-2001 BUDGET
INTRODUCTION
9-1 1 District Background
The establishment of the Tarrant County 9-1 1 District was authorized by the State Legislature
and ratified by voters in 1985 for the purpose of implementing and maintaining an Enhanced
9-1 1 emergency call network for residents of the District. Service was established in August
1987 Distract boundaries include all of Tarrant County all areas outside Tarrant County
included in the corporate limits of a member city plus DFW Airport and the Crty of Irving.
District Management
As defined in the legislation, the District is governed by a Board of Managers, who appoint an
Executive Director Current board members and their appointing authority include
Member Appointed By
Wyntress Ware (Chair) Fort Worth
Jim Austin Fort Worth
Gary Robertson Arlington
Bill Serrault Tarrant County
Jack Adkison Mayors Council
Richard Berryh~ll Southwestern Bell
2000-2001 BUDG ET OVERVIEW
The largest single expenditure for the District will continue to be the charges billed monthly to
the Distract by the telephone company service providers for the provision of a 9-1 1 network, the
associated data base, and call-processing equipment located in the District's 46 9-1 1 call
centers. However as the Distract invests more resources in the upgrading of networks and
features to address the demands of changing technology and the growing number of vv~reless
users, this routine cost is decreasing as a percentage of the overall budget. For fiscal year
1993-94 this total cost was $1 709 000 or 59% of the total budget. The 2000-2001 budget
allocates $2,927,548 for this cost, yet as a percentage of the total budget, it drops to 30%.
The shrinking percentage of monthly recurnng expenditures for landline 9-1 1 service, even as
the dollar amount increases, indicates the extent of the investment required by the District to
improve 9-1 1 services to accommodate expanding demand. This includes investment in new
call-center equipment and services, and development of the District's Mapped-Automatic
Location Identifier (ALI) program.
/
TARRANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
•
Wireless access issues continue to dominate public safety communications nationwide, as the
number of users surpasses 90 mzllion. The numbers of wireless callers combined v~nth the lack
of location capability have presented challenges to 9-1 1 services nationwide. As a result, the
Federal Communications Commission issued a ruling m 1994 establtslung Phase I and Phase II
mandates for wireless providers and public safety Phase I requires public safety agencies
receiving 9-1 1 calls from wireless customers be provided call-back number and tower
identification, provided the agency is equipped to receive this data. Phase II requires public
safety agencies be provided location data accurate to within 100 meters 67% of the time by
October 2001 provided the agency is equipped to receive and display this data.
The implementation of Phase I m Tarrant County has been initiated dunng the current fiscal
year but the full first year impact will be included in the proposed 2000-2001 budget. This full
year implementation will cost $1 816,513 These costs represent charges by the wireless carriers
to the 9-1 1 District for the provision of call-back data and tower location. In addition,
preparation for Phase II continues with the implementation of Mapped-ALI, which includes costs
for development of the base map and procurement of hardware and software to be located in
9-1 1 centers. The 2000-2001 costs for Phase II are $1,360 900
It should be noted that landline callers do not subsidize efforts to integrate wireless users into the
9-1 1 system. Wireless revenue, which is a $ SO per month charge collected statewide and
• distributed to 9-1 1 providers based on a percentage of population, will increase to
approximately $3 183 000 during the 2000-2001 year
The statewide v~nreless fee is relatively new having been enacted by the Texas Legislature in
1997 partially in response to the FCC ruling. It has grown rapidly as the number of v~nreless
customers expands, and now represents 42% of projected revenue. The traditional monthly
service fee, which was assessed upon the creation of the District in 1985 remains the primary
source of revenue for Distract operations. Unlike the statewide wireless fee, each emergency
communications Distract in the state assesses its own fee based upon its legislation and its needs.
`Home rule cities" are those municipalities which did not enter a Distract, but had in effect an
agreement for 9-1 1 service provision with a telephone service provider praor to 1988 and also
set their own fees.
2
TAR.R.ANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
A -
companson of 9 1 1 service fees for Distracts and home rule cities statewide follows.
Emergency Communication Districts
Agency R B T
9-I 1 Network of East Texas 0 46 1 07 1 68
Abilene/Taylor County Distract 0 41 0 93 1 41
Austin County Emergency Communications District
Bexar Metro 9-1 1 Network Distract 0.22 0.51 0 77
Brazos county Emergency Communications District 0.54 1.21 2.26
Calhoun County 9-1 1 Emergency Communications Distract 0.53 1.37 2.19
Cameron County Emergency Communications Distract 0.50 0.50 0.50
Dallas County (Balance of County)*
Denco Area 9-1 1 Distract 0.27 0 71 1 13
Ector County 9-1 1 District 0 42 0 99 1 48
El Paso County 9-1 1 Distract 0.20 0.50 0 80
Galveston County Emergency Communications Distract 0 55 1.28 1.93
Greater Harris County 9-1 1 Emergency Network 0.33 0 75 0 87
Henderson County 9-1 1 Communications Distract **
Howard County 9-1 1 Communications District 0.50 1 17 1 86
Kerr County Emergency 9-1 1 Network 0 41 1 OS 177
Lubbock Emergency Communications District 0.55 1.28 1 93
McLennan County Emergency Assistance District 0.32 0 75 1 13
Medina County 9-1 1 Distract 0 49 115 181
Midland Emergency Communications Distract 0 46 1 07 1 68
Montgomery County Emergency Communications District 0.55 1.28 1 93
Nortex 9-1 1 Communications District 0 46 1 07 1 61.
Potter Randall County Emergency Communications District 0 41 0 96 1 45
Tarrant County 9-1 1 District 0.20 0.46 0.74
Texas Eastern 9-1 1 Network 0.26 0 62 0 98
Service Fee Rates for Emergency Communication Districts(in dollars)
R=Residential, B=Business and T=Trunk rates
* Operates like ahome-rule city under Subchapter E, Chapter 772
** Within statutory limit of six percent (6%) of base rate.
Source CSEC Survey and follow-up
3
•
•
TA~RRANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
Home-Rule City
Addison (Police Department)
Aransas Pass
Cedar Hill (Police Department)
Coppell (Police Department)
Dallas (Emergency Communications Department)
Denison (Fire Department)
Desoto (Police Department)
Duncanville (Central Comm. PSAP Office)
Ennis (Police Department)
Farmers Branch (Police Department)
Garland (Police Department)
Glenn Heights (Police Department)
Longview (PSAP)
Highland Park (Department of Public Safety)
Hutchins (Police Department)
Kilgore (Police Department)
Lancaster (Fire/Police Department)
Mesquite (Police Department)
Plano
Portland (Police Department)
Richardson (Police Department)
Rowlett (Police & Fire Commumcations Center)
Sherman (Police Department)
Sunnyvale*
University Park (Police Department)
Wylie
Service Fee Rates for Home Rule City Programs (in dollars)
R=Residential, B=Business and T=Trunk rates
* Services provided under contract with Dallas County
* * Six percent (6%) of base rate
* * * Eight percent (8%) of base rate
Source CSEC Survey and follow-up
4
R B T
0.62 1.52 2.40
100 100 100
**
0 75 0 75 1.25
0 62 1.52 2.40
0.50 0 75 0 75
0.57 1 00 1.50
0 75 0 75 I.50
0 49 1 15 1.82
0.28 0 75 0 75
0 75 1.25 2.00
**
**
***
1 00 1 50 1.50
0 87 0.87 0 87
0 62 1 52 2.50
0 62 0.50 0 62
0 75 0 75
1.30 1.30 1.30
0 75 1.25 2.00
0 88 0 88 0 88
0.32 0.32
**
1.22 2.93 4 47
TARI[tANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
•
The 1999-2000 Operating Budget projected expenditures exceeding revenues as a result of
extensive upgrades to customer premise equipment combined with Phase I implementation costs.
With wireless providers and Districts continuing to negotiate pricing and technology during most
of the year however wireless costs are projected to be only a small portion of those originally
budgeted. With revenues increasing beyond expectations, the current fiscal yeaz will end with a
$1.5 million surplus.
The final year of upgrades to existing 9-1 1 call center equipment, coupled with the first full year
of Phase I costs and the first of four full years of investment in 9-1 1 call center hazdwaze and
software for the provision of Phase II services, will result in a projected deficit of $1,849 000 for
the 2000-2001 fiscal yeaz The completion of the mayor upgrades, the continued growth of
wireless revenues, and the absence of substantial increases m staff or other administrative costs
over the next five years will allow the Distract to return to the position of a budget surplus by
2003-2004 Reserves for enhancements will adequately provide for expenditures during the next
three yeazs.
For the projected cash position at the close of the next fiscal year please refer to the `Fund
Balance Projection at the end of this narrative. In addition, afive-year projection follows as the
final segment of this budget document.
District Goals for 2000-2001
The District's responsibility has evolved from simply providing Enhanced 9-1 1 service to every
public safety agency within the District boundaries and providing public education programs. In
the competitive, high-tech environment, the Distract's tasks have expanded. The inclusion of the
growing number of v~nreless callers has been a priority nationwide for several yeazs. The
competitive environment requires the District's accommodation of competitive local exchange
carriers, as well as additional wireless carriers. Growth in the District guarantees an additional
azea code overlay during the next year
New technology and its impacts on telephony continue to require the commitment of staff time.
In partnership with our network, CPE and database providers, staff proactively pursues effective
methods of incorporating evolving telephony into various phases of our 9-1 1 operations.
In order to aclieve the overall goal of providing cost-efficient, reliable enhanced 9-1 1 service to
all emergency callers within the District, there are specific tasks which must be completed, and
milestones which must be met within a specific timeframe This allows us to define our mission
in terms of goals and objectives.
5
TA.-RRANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
Goal # 1 Com fete the im lementation of FCC-mandat d
p p e Phase I wireless
service for the five largest wireless carriers.
Whereas service is currently available from two carriers, neither is under
contract with the District, and five other carriers are negotiating. To
implement service from the five largest carvers would accommodate 95%
of wireless callers.
Goals # 2 Develop Mapped-ALI as the foundation for eventual Phase II
Wireless service through the generation of a complete street network
as a GIS basemap for the Tarrant County 9-1 1 jurisdiction.
The completion of Mapped ALI provides the basis for the provision of
Phase II location of all wireless callers, and requires the completion of a
number of critical tasks, including the installation of ArcInfo 8.x as a GIS
software application, the use of digital orthophotography to generate an
accurate, updated street network basemap for the entire Distract, and to
complete the data conversion for all street names and addresses for the
entire District.
Goal # 3 Provide reliable, uninterrupted 9-1 1 service to all entities within the
Tarrant County 9-1 1 District.
The District has prepared an extensive contingency plan and worked to
update this plan for several years. Components of the plan include
alternate routing, the use of the TC9-1 1 District training PSAP as an
alternate site, and the provision of `hot sites" for Fort Worth, Arlington,
and DFW Airport. Contingency planning is a priority for the District, and
adjustments to the network and PSAP s will continue.
Goal # 4. Provide or facilitate training that supports the 9-1 1 function within
Tarrant County 9-1 1 PSAPs and proactively pursue industry-wide
training issues that impact local 9-1 1 training.
The District will provide or facilitate training that supports the operation
of the hardware and software supplied by the 9-1 1 District for the
delnvery of Enhanced 9-i 1 service and the foundation concepts and
practnces that are common to Tarrant County PSAPs.
•
6
TARRANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
•
Revenues
Expenditures
Personal Services
Supplies/Materials
Furniture/Equipment
Services/Rentals
Contingencies
Total Expenditures
Operating Surplus (Deficit)
BUDGET SUMMARY
1999-2000 1999-2000 2000-2001
Budget Estimate Budget
6,407,695 7 113,827 7 610,355
916 020 922,654 992,360
309 790 130 000 679,900
1623,925 528,125 1,332,370
4,831 449 3,997,247 6 425 011
30,000 0 30,000
7 711 184 5,578,026 9 459 641
(1,303 489) 1,535 801 (1,849,286)
REVENUES
Landlme revenue continued to increase during the current fiscal year This is apparently
attributable to the robust economy and the growth of areas covered by the District. Current year
landline revenues are estimated to exceed the budgeted amount by over $340 000 Future annual
growth is projected at 5%.
Wireless revenues from the State-administered Wireless Trust Fund, which is distributed back to
9-1 1 entities based upon population, aze projected to increase by 26% over the 1998-1999 fiscal
year Future wireless revenues are projected at a conservative 15% annual growth.
Interest revenues have exceeded estimates due to deferred spending through this fiscal year
However it is anticipated that earning will drop off slightly as upgrades are completed and the.
wireless Phase I fees begin.
EXPENDITURES
The category defined as `Utilities, which includes funds for monthly operating costs billed by
telephone service providers, anticipated costs billed by wireless providers, and the non-recurring
costs of enhancements to the system, makes up almost 60% of the operating budget. The cost of
purchasing fiu7uture and equipment represents 14% of the total budget, and salaries and benefits
another 10%. It should be noted that the furniture and equipment item includes expenditures that
have been included in the `9-1 1 Enhancements" category previously Equipment or
enhancements which aze purchased under tariff and not actually owned by the District aze
budgeted under `(9-1 1 Enhancements" under Services and Rentals, whereas equipment,
• including PSAP equipment, which the District purchases outright, are budgeted under `Furniture
and Equipment.
7
TARRANT COUNTY 9-l
2000-2001 Budget
• In terms of new programs or expenditures, District expenditures aze primarily concentrated m
two areas improvements towazd implementation of Phase I and Phase II wireless, and overall
upgrades to the network and to PSAP s.
Wireless Improvements -The largest single wireless related expenditure will be the projected
$1 816,513 cost of Phase I service, which will be billed by the vv~reless carriers and
Southwestern Bell Telephone. This cost has been negotiated among carriers and all 9-1 1
providers in Texas, and the individual costs have been considerably reduced as a result of this
process. The upgrade of PSAP equipment to achieve Phase I will have been completed by the
end of the current fiscal yeaz
In prepazation for Phase II, the District is developing Mapped-ALI, as well as providing for
hardware and softwaze additions at the PSAP level. The implementation of Mapped-ALI, which
v~nll provide a graphic display of an accurate base map at every call-taker position in the District,
is projected to take place over a four yeaz period. Annual budgeted funds provide for PSAP
hazdwaze ($633 145-PSAP Equipment, Acct. 5321), softwaze at the PSAP ($633 750-Software,
Acct. 5250), and professional consulting services to provide for cable installation, tech support,
and training ($92,075-Other Services, Acct. 5415)
PSAP, Network Upgrades -Expenditures for Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) added under
tariff and not inventoried by the District (Acct. 5453) include upgrades for Fort Worth Police and
Fire answering points, Upgrading MedStaz equipment and the installation of PC-based call
record data collection and analysis capabilities at the PSAP level to measure and evaluate the
performance of the overall network and CPE. The budgeted amount for these enhancements is
$866 000
Expenditures for CPE which will be inventoried by the District (Acct. 5321 PSAP Equipment)
include CPE upgrades for Irving, Southlake, Azle, Keller and the DFW Airport Primary plus a
backup site for Irving. The total budgeted under this category is $634 000
Personal Services
Funds in this category include all salaries and benefits.
The District estimates a 10% increase in health coverage for employees for the next fiscal yeaz
The Distract originally provided fora 20% increase, but was able to negotiate alower-than-
anticipated rate effective July 1 2000 The budget allows for a potential increase when the next
contract is negotiated.
Personal Services
5110 Salaries 781,835
5120 Health Benefits 141 450
5130 Retirement Benefits 54 075
5132 Medicaze 10 000
5150 Workers' Comp 5,000
Total Personal Services 992,360
8
TA]~RANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
•
Supplies and Matenals
Most expenditures under this category are budgeted according to three-year trends.
Software, however includes the first year of the four year Mapped-ALI program, with $633 750
for Mapped-ALI software to be PSAP located.
Sunnlies and Matenals
5210 Office Supplies 19,350
5220 Printing 4,500
5230 Postage 2,500
5240 Maps/Matenals 7 400
5250 Software 646,150
Total Supplies & Materials 679 900
•
Furniture and Equipment
The expenditure for office equipment includes an additional lateral file, an additional punter
stand, and replacement of various pieces of furniture that may be unanticipated at the current
time. With no staff additions, this item is probably the lowest fiuniture expenditure the District
has budgeted.
Office equipment provides for the replacement of computer equipment, an additional laptop
computer for field work by the Systems Support Manager a replacement work station and
punter for the Data Base Coordinator an additional CD ROM Writer/Dupe for the Mapped-ALI
program, replacement computer and printer for the GIS Technician, UPS for training PC s, and
vanous upgrades to memory and hard drives.
As hnghlighted earlier this category nncludes $1,267145 for PSAP equipment whnch is
purchased and nnventoned by the Dnstrnct.
Furniture and Eauroment
5310 Office Furniture
5311 PSAP Furniture
5330 Office Equipment
5321 PSAP Equipment
Total Furniture and Equipment
2,900
0
62,325
1,267,145
1,332,370
9
TARRANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
•
Services and Rentals
The Services and Rentals accounts aze the lazgest component of the 9-1 1 Distnct Operating
Budget, and cover all services and equipment which aze paid for under tariff, rental agreement or
othervv~se paid for but not purchased by the District.
The lazgest single expenditure continues to be the `9-1 1 Service (Acct. 5452), which is the
monthly recurring costs paid the telephone service providers for network and data base services
and PSAP CPE. The annual increases are mostly driven by growth in line count, in addition to
PSAP upgrades.
One mayor annual expense is the rental of office space, 9400 squaze feet which the District leases
at Water Gardens Place. No rental increase is called for until April 2002
The Distnct provides AT&T Language Line service for all PSAP's. This expenditure is
estimated to be $120 000 for the 2000-2001 year
The changing technology and environment requires extensive training and attendance at
meetings and seminazs, including annual conferences for NENA and APCO These expenses aze
included under the `Travel and `Professional Development" categories. It is often difficult to
weigh the needs of individuals for training and development opportunities with the need to
maintain reasonable limits on this type of expenditure. Funds are provided for what is
anticipated to be adequate coverage and attendance for Distnct staff and boazd at critical
educational functions, as well as appeazances before regulatory and legislative bodies.
Services and Rentals
Contractual Services
5411 Legal 24 000
5412 Professional Audit 6,500
5414 Equipment Maintenance 7 050
5415 Other Services 354 010
5416 Professional Development 44,455
Total Contractual Services 436 015
Lease Payments
5421 Office Lease 120 000
5422 Equipment Lease 7,350
Total Lease Payments 127,350
Travel & Auto
5431 Auto Allowance 51,300
5432 Travel 54,525
Total Travel & Auto 105,825
10
~'
TARRANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
• Membershi s & Subscri bons
5441 Memberships 3,215
5442 Subscnptions 3,000
Total Memberships & Subscriptions 6,215
Utilities
5451 Office Phone 25 000
5452 9-1 1 Service 2,927,548
5453 9-1 1 Enhancements 869,500
5456 Wireless Costs 1,816,513
Total Utilities 5,638,561
Insurance
5460 Insurance 3,725
Total Insurance 3 725
Advertismg
5472 Public Ed Products/Services 47 420
5473 Public Ed Pnntmg 36,900
5474 Public Ed Activities 23,000
Total Advertising 107,320
Total Services & Rentals 6,425 011
•
11
TARRANT COUNTY 9-1 1
2000-2001 Budget
•
•
•
FUND BALANCE PROJECTION
District fund balances are divided into three `funds. The first is a `Contingency Reserve Fund,
which allows for meeting unanticipated needs and is set at $500 000
The second fund, `Building Escrow Fund, is based upon a requirement of the District's lease
agreement and is set aside to offset the owner's build-out in the event the District ceases to exist
as a result of legislation, etc The amount decreases by a tenth of the original amount each year
and earn interest for the Distract. The current amount required $124,240
The third fund is `Reserve for Enhancements, which includes the remaimng fund balance and is
set aside for future improvements and additions to call-taking equipment or service
arrangements. These funds are reduced when expenditures exceed revenues.
June 1 Fund Balance
Add Fee and Interest Revenue, June-Sept. 2000
Less Projected Expenditures, June-Sept. 2000
Projected Fund Balance, September 30 2000
Projected Deficit, 2000-2001
Projected Fund Balance, September 30 2001
Fund Balance Distribution
Required Reserve
Escrow Fund
Reserve for Enhancements
$ 7 425 118
2,927 606
3,227,231
$ 7 125 493
1 849,286
$ 5,276,207
$ 500 000
124,240
4,651 967
12
TARRANT COUNTY 9=1-1
2000-2001 BUDGET
2000-2001
TOTAL
REVENUES
Landline 4,226 755
Wireless 3 183 600
Interest 200 000
Other 0
Total Revenue 7 610 355
EXPENDITURES
Personal Services
Salaries 781 $35
Health Benefits 141 450
Retirement Benefits 54 075
Medicare 10 000
Workers Comp 5.000
Total Personal Services 992 360
'
~ Supplies and Materials
Office Supplies 19 350
Printing 4 500
Postage 2 500
Maps & Materials 7 400
Software 646.150
Total Supplies & Materials 679 900
Furniture & Equipment
Office Furniture 2 900
PSAP Furniture 0
Offrce Equipment 62 325
PSAP Equipment 1,267,145
Total Furniture & Equipment 1 332 370
Services & Rentals
Contractual Services
Legal 24 000
Professional Audit 6 500
Equipment Maintenance 7 050
• Other Services 354 010
Professional Development 44,455
Total Contractual Services 436 015
TARRANT COUNTY 9-1-1
2000-2001 BUDGET
Page 2
2000-2001
TOTAL
Lease Payments
Office 120 000
Equipment `7,350
Tota! Lease Payments 127 350
Travel & Auto
Auto Allowance 51 300
Travel 54.525
Total Travel & Auto 105 825
Memberships & Subscriptions
Memberships 3,215
Subscriptions 3,000
Total Memberships & Subscriptions 6,215
Utilities
Office Phone 25 000
9-1 1 Service 2 927 548
9-1 1 Enhancements 869 500
Wireless Costs 1,816,513
Total Utilities 5 638 561
Insurance
Insurance 3,725
Total Insurance 3 725
Advertising
Public Ed Products/Services 47 420
Public Ed Printing 36 900
Public Ed Activities 23.000
Total Advertising 107 320
Total Services & Rentals 6 425 011
Contingencies 30 000
Total Expenditures 9.459,641
Operational Surplus (Deficit) (1 849 286)
~ U
O
a
~ z
o
~ °z
Z
!"' W
M
ti
M
i ~
r
i ~
mot'
ch
Cp
r
O
r
O
~'
O
N
N ~
ti
N
M
~ N
r
ti
O M O N
C7 V' O CO
O O O O
1~ Cp O M
~ M ~ r
O
~ O O
r
Or ~ O Cp
et M O I~
N ~- O M
01 M O N
(~ (~ r (~
~t eh ~ O
tp et O O
~t ~ O O
fit' N O t~
O I~ O CO
M N O M
CD O r 1`
~' ~ ( O
ao 0 o ao
CD CO O N
~ O O to
i~ r O O
C7 O t(7 00
~7' ~ ~- O
~~ ~~
O O o
O O
-.coo
CO C7 O O
N OO O r
N ~-- N (D
~' c"') I ti
m
U
C
c~ ~
m C
C
~ ~
~
a~ W ~ ~ n ~
w
C
.~ :0 ~ ~ ~
~ `~~ p
F^
•~ ~~ ~o
m
~ ~ CO O cp
1~ N ~ O O ~
M ~ r O ~.
O ~ ti O ti
~ N CD r
N
r
O ~ O O ~
d M
(Dc+')OO O
M Lt7 C7 O 01 CO
~'- O CD •- I O
O N r
r
~ 1~ Cn d O 00
O tD O O N
1~ 00 t0 +- M
00 e- r
r
~ O N_ O O 1~
ti ff 0 0 0
Gp O M O lf') r
N (D ~ r I~
CO .'- O
r
~no~no 0
r~~nt~ooco
CO ~ O O M
~ ~
O ~' ~
I~ •-- O
N
N
U
.Z
~ ~'
~ ~
~ ~
N C QQ C
~ m p N
a~i ~ U a
aNi m E c`o ~ to
~ 'C .L_.. `1 U Y ...
O
v~=~~~~
O O O O O
O O O O O
~ O O O O
N ~ M ti ~
O O O O O
O O O O In
~ O O ~ ~
N ~ M I~ (D
N ~
O O O O O
O O O O ~
~ O O O n
r In C7 I~ lf)
N ~
O O O O O
0 0 0 0 N
~ O O t1') i~
O tt~ M 1~ ~
N V' ~
0 0 0 0 0
~nooo 0
M In t1~ ~' O
O d' N ~ ~
~D
_N
(0
.
`
N
r-+
c~
N
~ ~
to
N
.
~
v -
C,
Q
a ~
~ ~
~
~ O ~ o~S ~ t9
a~ ~ ~ ~ `~ o
~ ~
O ~
Oan. ~ cn
a
a
c
'v
lL
m
LL
i
~'
•
•
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O to O O In O d M M to ~ lj7
~ ~ ~ ~ N O O u ~ ~ ~ M (O
tt) O
N N M r r r
O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O
O O In O O O O O O O O O o O
O O 1~ O to O O to O ~ M M ~ ~
~ O
~ ~ N fD 00
0 M ~ C M ~D
` l tt t ~ O
h M 'e}' r r r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 ~n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
O O f~ O~ 0 0 to O ~ M M ll~ ~ ~
~
0 ~ O
N cD 00 M CO
t ` M ~ to to q
I~ M tt r r r
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O to O O O O O O O O O O O
O O f~ O lC) O O In O d M M In ~ lt7
~ O M `~ CO 00 O CO O 1~ r Cp M (p
~ ~ N M ~ N to O
~
O O N ti 0 0~~ ~ O O O tt~ ~ ~
~
.-
d c~ M O~ O O O O M M ap N N
~ N M ~
N O~ M N M Cfl
CD t N ~ O
M
r M s1' r r r
a
ti
¢8
8
~_
'o
a`
m
c
v
c
m
.2
LL
N
C
O
a
~ N y
A
Q
. U
C 'Z (/~
r ~ v ~ ~ H
C o!S
d) a~ C O ~ ~ Q °~
Z n °~
,~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .= N N ~ ' y ~
O v ~ ~ ~ ~ cv cv a ~ a~
V op ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- o
~
~ V
Z ~ ~ 3 ~= ~ ° ~
"
~
i a
i .
a ~ o a~
ai N ~ Q ~ Q I~ V ca .~ ~" ~ .~ F-
~ U ~. O
F- O H O
I- ~ y 0
F-
~ ~
Q o ~ ~ ~ ~
~ oaoa N ~ ~~ ~
~awoct ~ Q
ow ~ ~
Qf-- ~ ~
~cn
~
E-aa w
.~
•
r
O
Z +~
~ ~
O '7
m
H
LL ~ i
o M
~ o ~
' ~a`a
0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 00 ~ ca ~
n °o
~ 0
~0 0 0
0 0 0
0
~n
o
rn
~
~'
~ M ~ O ~ CD to ~
' M to
O ~ (~ M ~ CAD
N N O O ~ O ~ ~ N
~
f~ CD O O N ti
O O O O
' O~ O
O
O O O
O O O
O O
'~t O
O ~
1~ ~ ~''~
~
O ~fi O
O O O d
~ ~
O
o
j O O O M O GO M
O ~''~
~ to M O N C
p
l
~O ~~
~' M ~
O CV
~ O
M O
f~ N O
O
N O O N r CO N M
,, ~
N ~
M 00
~ O O ~
~ ~
O ~' O d' O
O 0 0
O O O
O d'
CO O
O ~
i~ j ~
O ap p
O M O Cp
N ~
O O O O O O ~ ~ ~'
N t1~ CD O I~ (O In to
~ M l1~
O I~ O
~"~ O N (O
~
N (~ O ~ N ~ ~
M In CD 00 ~
O O O ~ O O O O M
ti O
O N
ti ^
~ ~'`~
CO
O O O
O CO O f~
I~ ~
O
O O O
O O O
O ~ O ~?
N C O iD O ~ M O ~ M ~ O
' O
~ )
l1 O
O ~
M ~
~ Ln 00 ... st
M r O ~ M
O t~ ~
~
~
~' O
O
O
(O N
~ to f~ O CO M I~ CO
V' M I~
O l1~
N O
M ~
M ~ ~O
N
N N CO M r' ~ ~ ~
O 0p
N (D
~
O
O 00
~ ~
N
N
N
U
.~
N
N ~ O
~ V V O ~ C
~ C 7 C = N
.
~
U C O t9 p ~ ~
O .` V j
C
~
L Z L V~ N
~ C ~ d Q 'O
'fl 'p 'p Q
a~ w N~ C~ W W W
~ ~ ~
`- ~ ~ O .U ,U V ~
a~ ~
~ ~ F- .n ~ ~ F-
~~~- ~ ~
O ~ o~ dad
.^r
~U
N ~
~ ~
'
-'
C
~
~
U
.~
~
~
w°.
t°-
~
~
~
~
c
U
N
~
,.~~+
_
Q
X
W
~
I-
N
~
~
~
~
C
p
'~
~
O ~
V
(4
~
m
C
~
LL
rn
c
a
W
`s
'o
a`
v
c
LL
m
L