Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 43108-A1 CSC NO. AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 43108 MASTER UTILITY ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT FOR Trinity River Vision Project This Amendment is entered into by and between the City of Fort Worth ("City"), and Atmos Energy Corporation. ("Utility"). WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 43108 (the "Agreement"), authorized by M&C C-25437, which was effective on April 6, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Contract involves the identification and relocation of the Utility's Facilities(as defined in the Agreement);and WHEREAS,the parties contemplated the revision of certain exhibits during the planning process to describe and document the specific relocations performed; and WHEREAS,the City and Utility now desire to amend the original Agreement to provide updated exhibits that describe the specific relocations performed to date; NOW, THEREFORE, City and Utility, acting herein by the through their duly authorized representatives, enter into the following Amendment to the original Agreement: 1. Exhibits A, B, C, D and E attached hereto do hereby supplement the original Agreement and are hereby incorporated into the Agreement as follows: Phase I—Henderson Street Phase II—Main Street Phase III—White Settlement Road Phase IV—Shamrock Avenue Phase V—Houston Street 2. her provisions of the Contract which are not expressly amended herein shall remain in, 61 fo c effect. , H OFFICIAL RECORD i CITY SECRETARY WORTH,TX wd t< <4 i ACCORDINGLY, the City and Utility have each caused this instrument to be executed in each entity's respective name by its respective duly authorized signatory effective as of the date subscribed by the City's designated City Manager. CITY OF FORT WORTH: ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION By: ,�` By: Jesus J. Chapa r If SEf"q Ir. k..:?t�T Assistant City Manager TITLE Vi rC Pte!%dti+ Date:— �� � "'1 Date: Rec9xi�rtended by: Katherine Beck Manager,Trinity River Vision Project for City of Fort Worth APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Douglas W. ac Sr. Assistant City Attorney FORT l�fj 0. .%7p ATTEST: j M ry ,go 7E}(PPS City Secx M&C: None Required Amendment No. I to CSC No.43108 Page 2 of 2 OFFICIAL RECOR® ®CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH, TX i i i Exhibit A EXIIIBIT 4 Form of Adjustment Schedule FWCC Project Location: State Highway#199(Henderson St.) Project Limits White Settlement Rd. From: West Fork of Trinity River To: Estimated Costs: $665,174.00 Note:Plans, Specifications and Estimate must be attached to support the Estimated Costs. The supporting documentation must show items, quantities, units and unit costs. The purpose of this form Is to inform the City of the anticipated dates by which Utility's facilities that are In conflict with the above project limits will be adjusted. The dates below assume that the City has acquired all necessary right-of-way for the project,that sufficient plans indicating the proposed Improvements have been submitted to Utility, and that design changes necessitating material utility facility redesign do not occur. Utility Company: Atmos Energy Corporation Anticipated Construction Start Date: December 10,2012 Anticipated Duration of Construction: 22 working days Anticipated Construction Completion January11,2013 Date: The information provided above is strictly an estimate and is provided to City solely for City's planning purposes. This form is not intended to create any legally binding commitments on either Utility or City,nor to waive any rights Utility or City might otherwise possess. If there is a conflict between prior submitted dates and those shown In this form, the dates set forth above should be used for City's planning purposes. 12/5//2012 Authorized Utility Representative Date Jeffrey S.Knights PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Trinity River Vision-Henderson St City of Fort Worth,TX(Tarrant County) Completed by:UEI (Comp 1261448) November 26,2012 Complete Project Ballpark Es stimnte Basis ATM ERIAL gyt Unit Osscrintlon Unit Cos 1840 feel PIPE POLY 4 PE 2408 SOR11 4oFr $ 2.66 /fool $4,689.24 80 feel PIPE POLY 314 PE 2406 SDR11 40FT $ 0.19 /foot $16.46 210 feel PIPE ERW 8 X.322W CS BARE BEV DRL X42 3 19.68 /foot $4,133.35 3 each ELL BF 4 90 DEG PE 2408 $ 10.20 /each $30.60 2 each ELL BF 4 45 DEG PE 2406 $ 10.18 /each $20.92 1 each CAP BF 4 PE 2406 $ 33.92 /each $33.92 1 each 17 L8 HIGH POTENTIAL MAGNESIUM ANODE S 67.70 /each $157.70 4 each 3 LB HIGH POTENTIAL MAGNESIUM ANODE $ 28.60 /each $114.40 1,920 feet WIRE 912 CU YLW SOLID THHN 500FT $ 0.14 /foot $268.00 1 each Small Dollar Material(estimated at 5%of listed malarial)and Includes 6.00'/. s4ee.19 small dollar Items such as:Tool&,PIL Markers.Curb boxes(test lead boxes), Gloves and other consumables,etc. Stares Loading 4.00% $393.28 Freight 2.60% $245.80 Stores Overhead 4.00% $418.84 Stale Sales Tax 8.25% $811.14 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $11,701.03 COMPANYLABOR 76 hours Operations 3 50.00 /hour $3,760,00 120 hours Englneering/Conslructon Management $ 70.00 /hour $8,40D.00 40 hours Right-of-Way $ 80.00 /hour $2,400.00 20 hours Environmental-Review and Mgt. S 85.00 /hour $1,300,00 1 lot zBenatls OH 54.23% $ 8,696.48 fioi $8,595.46 TOTAL COMPANY LABOR COSTS $24,446.46 RWHT-OF-WAY 10000 ft"2 Temporary Work apace $6.00/fl"2 $60,D00.00 2 day Contract ROW Agent $ 750.00 /lay 31,600.00 TOTAL R-O-W COSTS(payments to landowners) $61,600.00 TRV Henderson Cost Estimate 119012 ekofLxisx CONSTRUCTION 1 Act Installation of approx.1840'of 4,with 210'of 8"casing,and 120'of 104,000.00 /lot $184,000.00 314"Poly by approved bore and/or open trench method Includes,but not Ilmlled to stringing,fusing,boring,pullback,trenching,strength testing, back811,hot lapping,reslodng and reseeding coat,Includes two(2) mobalizations. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS(per scope of work) $184,000.00 CONTRACTEXPENSE 0 days Xray S 1,350.00 /day $0.00 120 hours Project Management S 118.00 /hour 514,160.00 120 hours Engineering $ 99.00 /hour 511,680.00 126 hours Drafting $ 96.06 /hour $12,000.00 8 hours Project Director(P.E.reviews and seals dwge.) $ 121,00 Amour $968.00 6 hours. Project Administrator $ 58.00 /hour $348.00 4 hours Project Controls S 99.00 ffrour $396.00 500 mile Vehicle Mileage(Engineer) $ 0.60 /mile $2150,00 8 week Environmental Inspection $ 1,025.00 Aveek $6,150.00 30 day 3rd Parry Inspection $ 061.00 /day 519,630.00 4 day Survey(Pipeline Centerline Staking) $ 2,000.00 /day 58,000.00 TOTAL CONTRACT EXPENSE COSTS $73,982.00 MISCELLANEOUS o lot Gas Loss/Allemale Fuel S 50.00 /lot SO.DO TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS COSTS $0,00 TOTAL DIRECT CO575sm-egual Indire Other Expenses(RHUTTS) (see note 8) $41,622.56 Corporate Overhead(Labor,Corp ASG,BU ASG) (see note 6) 26% $90,187.38 Project Reserves for Costs and Scheduing 10% $48,743.84 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $180,$63.79 O AL TIMATED PROJECT COSTS 538 8 Other Interest Carrying Charge 18% $97,317.08 Franchise Fee 5% $31,674.97 TOTAL OTHER $128,992,06 T TAL PROJECT COSTS S 696——174'.-321 City of Fort Worth share 50% $332,587.16 AssumolionslCommenls 1)No walerbody crossings and does not Include costs for karst discovery 2)One general contractor from Inception to completion and pries contingent on availability of contractor at time of award 3)Estimate does not Include coals for holding schedule In extreme weather conditions.Tie-Ins will be scheduled for 50 Deg F day. 4)Construction Estimate does not Include costs associated with SWPPP Permitting 5)Existing pipe shall be removed unless located under an existing road,then It will be abandoned In place 6)Corporate Overhead Rate varies at time of Rem cost. 7)Materials Pricing based on McJunkin Price Master. 8)RHUTTS(Rent,Heavy Equipment,Utilities,Telecom,and Transportation Services)estimated based on Company Labor @25%,Construction and Contract Expense®16% TRV Henderson Cost Es9mate 113012 ekotf.xisx Fort Worth Distribution RELOCATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is between Atmos Energy Corporation ("Atmos"), 5420 LBJ Fwy, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75240, and the City of Fort Worth, Texas (Requestor), and is effective as of the day of December, 2012. RECITALS 1. Atmos currently has natural gas pipeline facilities across the proposed TRV improvements project, (the "Pipeline"). 2. Requestor is currently planning construction activities that will conflict with the Pipeline, therefore the Pipeline must be relocated at the actual cost expense of Requestor. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual promises in this Agreement, the sufficiency of which are acknowledged,Atmos and Requestor agree as follows: 1. Atmos has prepared a good faith Ballpark Cost Estimate in the amount of $665,174.00 to relocate the Pipeline and provided a copy of said estimate to Requestor. 2. Requestor has agreed to reimburse Atmos for 50% of the actual cost to relocate the Pipeline. 3. Within thirty days following receipt by Atmos of the City's authorization, Atmos will begin, or cause others to begin, the relocation of the Pipeline. 4. Within 90 days of completion of the relocation of the Pipeline, Atmos will provide Requestor with a detailed invoice of the actual cost of the relocation of the Atmos facilities. Requestor will return payment to Atmos within 30 days of receipt of Atmos Invoice. 5. Neither party to this Agreement may assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement to any person without the prior written consent of the other party to this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement do not impart any rights enforceable by any person,firm, or organization not a party or an assignee of a party to this Agreement. 6. Any interpretation of this Agreement or any controversy related to this Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas. 7. No waiver by either party of any one or more defaults by the other party in the performance of any provision of this Agreement operates as a waiver of any future default or defaults, whether of a like or different character. 8. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter contained in this Agreement. No amendment or modification of this Agreement will be effective unless evidenced in writing signed by both parties to this Agreement. SIGNED AS OF THE DATE FIRST WRITTEN ABOVE: I City of Fort Worth, Texas Atmos Energy C ration By: By: - ob Carroll Its: Its: Right of Way Manager 2 i Exhibit B CXHIIIIT 4 Form of Adjustment Schedule FWCC Project Location: Trinity River Vision,Main St to Calhoun St. Project Limits Main St. From: Calhoun St. To: Estimated Costs: Total costs$7,192,948.89 Note:Plans, Specifications and Estimate must be attached to support the Estimated Costs. The supporting documentation must show items,quantities, units and unit costs. The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the anticipated dates by which Utitlty's facilities that are in conflict with the above project limits will be adjusted. The dates below assume that the City has acquired all necessary right-of-way for the project,that sufficient plans indicating the proposed Improvements have been submitted to Utility,and that design changes necessitating material utility facility redesign do not occur. Utility Company: Atmos Energy Anticipated Construction Start Date: August 16,2013 Anticipated Duration of Construction: 105 days Anticipated Construction Completion December 15,2013 Date: The information provided above is strictly an estimate and is provided to City solely for City's planning purposes. this form is not intended to create any legally binding commitments on either Utility or City,nor to waive any rights Utility or City might otherwise possess. If there is a conflict between prior submitted dates and those shown in this form,the dates set forth above should be used for City's planning purposes. �y �i '3 Authorized Utility a Date PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Trinity River Vision-Calhoun St City of Fort Worth,TX(Tarrant County) Completed by.UEI (Conflg 8192001 111212012,revise 0810612013 EKO Complete Project Ballparlc Estimate Oasis MATERIAL �( unit DellorIDtIDn Unit Cool 2060 feet PIPE ERW 24 X.600W CS FBE/ARO BEV DRL X42 $ 119.79 11001 $244,707.40 2000 feet PIPE ERW 24 X.376W CS FBE BEV DRI.X42 $ 100.00 (foot $200,000.00 20 feet PIPE ERW 20 X.3TSW CS FBE BEV DRL X42 $ 100.00 Hoot $2,000.00 2300 feet PIPE POLY 6 PE 2406 SDR11 40FT $ 6.22 Ifool $14,294.50 840 feel PIPE POLY 4 PE 2406 SDRC t 40FT $ 2.77 Root $2,325.09 320 feel PIPE POLY 2 PE 2409 SDR11 260FT $ 0.87 Hoot $278.24 3 each TDWllliams,24",spherical 3 way,OR.B(WPB) S 85,000.00 leach $195,000.00 1 ouch TD1MIIlams,20",spherical 3 way,OR.B(WPO) 5 50,000.00 leach $60,000.00 2 each TDWIIIIams,12",slapplo,GR.B(WP8) S 10,000.00 /each $20,000.00 4 each TDVAIIIsme,2",TOR,OR.B(WPB) S 2,000.00 /each $0,000.00 2 each ELL,24",90 DEGREE,.375WT,LR,OR.8(WPB)segmt S 3.620.00 /each $7,240.00 4 each ELL,24",45 DEGREE,.375WT,LR,OR.B(WPB)segmt 5 3,205.00 leach $12,020.00 19 each ELL,24",90 DEGREE,.3750WT,LR,OR.B(WPO) $ 1,620,00 /each $30,700.00 14 each ELL,24",45 DEGREE,.3760WT,LR,OR.B(WPB) S 1,205.00 /each $18,070,00 2 each CAP WILD 24 X.3750W XH CS OR.B(WP8) $ 405.00 leach $010.00 2 each CAP WLD 20 X.375W XH CS GR.O(IMPS) $ 350.00 leach $700.00 2 each TEE WLD 24 X 24 X 10 X.375W STD CS,OR.8(WPB) 5 3,500.00 /each 67,000.00 0 each REDUCER WLD a X 4 X.385W STD CS CONC G.R.O(WPB) S 50.14 /each $0.00 2 each REDUCER WLD 10 X 4 X.305W STD CS CONC OR.B(WPB) $ 155.35 Mach $310.89 1 each REDUCER WLO 24 X 20 X.375W STD CS CONIC OR.B(WPB) 5 1,176.99 leach $1,175.09 1 each REDUCER WLD 24 X 18 X.375W STD CS CONC OR.B(WPB) $ 800.00 /each $800.00 1 each REDUCER WLD 16 X 8 X.375W STD CS CONC OR.B(WPB) $ 500.00 leach $500.00 1 each REDUCER WLD 8 X 0 X.305W STD CS CONC OR.B(WP8) $ 05.00 /each $65.00 2 each TRANSITION a WLD X PE 2408 SDR11 $ 170.00 /each $352.00 1 each TRANSITION 4 WLD X PE 2400 8DR11 $ 65.00 leach $55.00 1 each TRANSITION 3 WLD X PE 2406 SDR11 $ 45.00 leach $45.00 1 each REDUCER OF 4 X 3 PE 2406 CENTRAL S 7.67 Root $7.57 1 each CAP BF 4 PE 2408 $ 8.a0 leach $8.80 2 each CAP BF 6 PE 2406 $ 21.00 Mach $42.00 550 each POWERCRETE J,2 LB KIT W/APPLICATOR $ 34.97 leach $19,233.50 250 each 3"paint brushes for epoxy $ 2.00 leach $500.00 10 each 17 L8 HIGH POTENTIAL MAGNESIUM ANODE $ 57.70 leach $577.00 8 each 3 LB HIGH POTENTIAL MAGNESIUM ANODE $ 26.00 leach $200.00 3,500 feet WIRE#12 CU YLW SOLID THHN 500FT $ 0.14 Root $490.00 1 each Small Dogar Malarial(estimated at 2%of bled material and Includes 200'/6 $16,743.77 small dollar Rema such as Cathodic Protection,P/L Markers,Pipe Coaling,disposable materials,etc) Stores Loading 1.0015 $8,530.32 Shipping/Tranoporiation 4.00% $34,157.29 Slate Sales Tax 0.26% $70,449.42 Materials Overhead 0.00% $0.00 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $967,078.37 COMPANY LABOR 500 hours Operations S 70.00 /hour $35,000.00 120 hours EnglneeringlConsWrlion Management $ 70.00 /hour $8,400.00 00 hours Rlghl-of-Way $ 70.00 /hour $5,600.00 90 hours Environmental-Review and MCI. $ 70.00 /hour 53,800.00 TOTAL COMPANY LABOR COSTS jd4.r88A0 RIGHT-OF-WAY 40000 RA2 Temporary Work space $200 ftA2 $80,000,00 4 day Contract ROW Agent $ 760.00 /day 33,008.00 TOTAL R-O-W COSTS(payments to landowner*) ;69,080.00 TRV Calhoun S1 Cost Estimate 08W2013_eko6b ykdac Rabs.xlsx CONSTRUCTION 1 not Installation of approx.4040'of 24"Steel by approved bore andfor open 1,507,000.00 Mol 51,507,000.00 trench method Includes,but not limited to stinging,fusing,boring, pullback,trenching,strength testing,back611,hot lapping,restoring and reseeding. 1 not [footprint of abandonment Inside levee fr second round TBD not Laler eonstmutlon] Removal of Abandon pipe In path of levee of approx. Sas note 0 620 it 12"Steel and 390 ft of e"PE,680 ft of s"steel,750 it of 4"PE, 100 ftof 4"slee1,70 ft of 3"PE,65 flof 3"aleel,and 010 ft of 7'steel by open trench method Includes,but not limited to trenching,backfill, restoring and reseeding,restoration of roadway. 1 Act Installation of approx.2208'of 8"Poly,840'of 4"Poly and 321'of 2" 250,100.00 not $250,100.00 Poly by approved bore and/or open tench method Includes,but no( ilmiled to stringing,fusing,boring,pullback,benching,al englh tenting, backfill,hot lapping,restoring and reseeding. 1 not Roadway repairs to return street to current roadway conditions 350,000.00 Bol $350,000.00 1 lel Flowable fill or select back 811 for lava@ fool print. 260,000.00 not 3260,00000 1 not Pig launcher and receiver,(lemp)and Smed pigs for location and piping 400,000.00 Mot $400,000.00 baseline 1 not Tapping 24",20"12"and o0tere as requlyd 3 way leo @topples,six 160,000.00 not $160,000.00 (6) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS(par scope of work) $2,907,100.00 CONTRACTEXPENSE 40 days Xray 3 1,350.00 /day $54,000.00 050 hours Project ManaDamenl $ 118.00 /hour 3100.300.00 800 hours Engineering 3 09.00 Amour $58,400.00 550 hours Drafting S 96.00 Atour $52,800.00 40 hours Project Director(P.E.reviews and seals dwgs.) $ 121.00 thour $4.840.00 20 hours Prefect Administrator 3 68.00 (hour $1,180.00 20 hours Project Controls S 90.00 (hour $1,960.00 1000 mile Vehicle Mileage(Engineer) 3 0.50 Imile $500.00 30 week Environmental Inspection 3 1,025.00 hveek $30,760.00 90 day 3rd Party Inspection 3 e01.00 /day $59,490.00 20 day Survey(Pipolne C@nlerline Staking) S 2,000.00 May $40,000.00 TOTAL CONTRACT EXPENSE COSTS $405,220.00 GASLOSS 0 lot Gas Loss/Allemale Fuel 3 50.00 not $0.00 TOTAL GAS LOSS COSTS $0.00 d AL DIRECT COSTS $4,420,9081az Indirect Corporate Overhead(Labor,Corp ABG,BU A&G) 35% $1,673,949.43 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $1,573,949.43 Other CIAC 10.20°/ 3818,453.70 Franchise Fee 5% $303,54729 TOTAL OTHER $1,122,001.09 TOTAL ESTIMATED P OJECT COSTS VAR2,l4no City of Fl Worth share 60% 63,699,474.45 Assumollons/Commenls 1)No watwbody crossings and does not Include costs for kart discovery 2)One general contractor from Inception to completion and prices contingent on evatiebl8ly of contractor at time of award 3)Estimate does not Include costs for holding schedule In exteme,weather conditions 4)Construction Estimate does not Include costs associated with SWPPP Perm38ng 5)Eids9ng pipe under the levee fool print In Main Sl shall be removed under an @tdsling road.The remainder of gra mains will be abandoned M place e)Corporate Overhead Rale varies at time of hem cost. 7)Melerfal Pricing based on McJunkin Price Master. 8)E)dsting pipe under the levee tool print outside of Main SI shall be removed per agreement w/COE In Phase 11 of construction at a later dale and TRV Calhoun St Cont Estimate 08052013_eko5b wclac fteba.xlsx CENTRAL CITY PROJECT DESIGN DECISION DOCUMENT(DDD)No,11 BYPASS CHANNEL NORTH SEGMENT ROCK R9M[OVAL Issue:The City of Fort Wonh and franchise utility owners are proceeding with the design and construction of utility relocations along the north segment of the proposed Bypass Channel,Rock excavation will be required ns part of the USACB channel construction within the north segment to achieve tine desired channel invert and cross section geometry.Tile Project Delivery Team(PDT)has concluded that lire most cost effective and efficient way to remove the estimated 200,000 CY of rock is vin controlled blasting techniques.The use of controlled blasting will necessitate that specific controls and requirements be placed on the bypass charnel contractor.The adjacent City and franchise utilities that cross the bypass channel will need to be designed and installed in a manner that will protect them from the future tock removal.The CDM/Stanley Joint Venture,under contract with USACE(CESWF), Contract No.W91260-11-D-0027,Task Order No.DO 0002 is to develop the final.Desigu Docnmentation Report(DDR)for the bypass channel and set of pians and specifications(P&S)for Segment B.The final DDR and P&S package,however,will not be finalized until after the utility relocation work has been designed and potentinlly installed.This document establishes the general requirements and parameters which will be used to develop the detailed technical specification for the i rock blasting. 1 Background: i • North Segment Bypass Channel: o Segment Length-3,700 LF(approx.) i r o Channel Bottom Width-160 to 1708(typical) t o Top of Existing Rock Surface-Range BL 510.6 to EL 519.50,Avg.EL 512(estimated) o Channel Profile-EL 494 to EL 508 o Estimate Rock Excavation Depth-Oft to 20ft o Estimate Rock Removal Volume-200,000 CY,of which n portion Is to be processed into L8 to 24 inch rlpmp to be used for channel bank erosion control • MninStreet Bridge- o Main Street Bridge will be constructed prior to the excavation and removal of bedrock for ' the bypass channel. o South set of V-pier Foundations For the bridge will*nire the blasting of bedrock by the Texas Department of Transportation(TXD"bridge contractor. o CFW bridge designer,Freese&Nichols,Inc.(FNI),Inas hired a blasting consultant, Gordon Revey-Revey Associates,Inc.to develop the blasting specification for the bridge contract as well as to provide blasting parameters to CBSWF in order to protect the Main Street Bridge during the CESWP rock removal work, o CFW agreed at tho meeting held on 28 March 2012 that the V-pier foundations bedrock excavation be expanded to a rainiinum of 20ft clear distance of the finished pier dimensions,The expanded excavation will be performed to alleviate CESWF from (raving to mechanically remove bedrock from around The piers during charnel excavation activitles to reduce the risk of the concrete piers being damaged from blasting the rock. CESWF Blasting Considerations.- The onsiderations:The protection of existing and proposed structures which will be in place prior to excavation of the channel are paramount to the development of the blasting requirements for the channel. • Health,safety,and the protection of the public are paramount to the blasting requirements. • Federal,State,and Local tyles,standards and regulations include but are not limited to: o City of Fort Worth Pire Marshall,Explosive Permit Rules o USACE EM 385-1-1,Section 29 Blasting o Federal Occmpallonal Silfety and Health Act of 1970 and Ilse Construction Safety Act Rf 1969,as mnemded t o OSHA of 1970,29 U.S.C.,Section 651 el seg.,inchtcling safely and health negrdatlons for coushvction 0 27 CFR Part SSS,implementation of the Sqfe GrplosivesAct,Title Xl,Srrblltle C of Public Law 107-296,Irterlun Fined Rade o CFR 49,Part 100-177(DOT RSPA),301-399(DOT FHA) • CESWF has n desire that the channel profile maintain it tolerance of+/-6 inches in order to maintain the hydraulic conveyance requirements.The charnel bottom surface is anticipated to ba fairly smooth due to the horizontnt lan innlions of the bedrock. • Channel Side slopes within the rack excavation are proposed to be presplit ou•I14:0 to provide smoother side slopes. • The hard edge retaining wail on the south/east side of the bypass channel is to be founded directly on the underling bedrock and requires a sound foundation.Blasting design must control the lateral extent of bedrock disturbance to minimize horizontal fissures in(lie bedrock j underlying the footings. { i • Main Street bridge foundation and superstructure will be protected in general accordance with the i recommendations established by the CFW blasting consultant as agreed to by USACE aad including a minimum 20 feet excavated zone around the piers to the Finished bypass Channel l grade. • Utility crossings of the bypass channel include a City water line,AT&T communications conduit i and 24 inch ATMOS high pressure gas line,Copies of the available information are included as an attachment. • Removal of the bedrock within the hypnss channel needs to be economical. i •• Soil overburden could be kept in place to serve as blast cove'based on the contr'actor's decision of means and methods. r • USACE or USACE designated representative will be.on site during nil blasting activities to ensure project specification and quality control and quality assurance requirements are followed. Blasting Specification Recommendations-.CESWF PDT recommends that the blasting specification follow the general parameters provided below.This is considered it baseline list and may be amended as i final design proceeds on tine bypass channel design: • Minimum Blasting Requirements for all Zones o Qualifications • The Contractor shall retain or employ an independent Blasting Consultant with at least 10 years experience involving controlled blasting work.The Blasting Consultant shall be a professional angineer registered in the State of Texas and shall have directly participated in projects of similar scope and complexity.The Blasting Consultant shall directly oversee nil test blasts(first blasts)and prepare t preliminary blasting plans and blast design modifications,based on observed i i results and mensurements.All blushing plans,test btnsting plans and revisions shall be reviewed and sealed by the Binsting Consultant. ■ Persons responsiblefor blasting shall be licensed blasters in the State of Texas and shall have at least 10 years of experience in responsible charge of similar excavations in rock and controlled blasting techniques. l ■ Pro-and post-construction surveys,vibration and blast monitoring shall be I condncted,analyzed and reported by a qualified professional engineer registered in the Stale of Texas. o Preconstruclion/Postconstnic(ion Surveys ■ Prior to start of eatthlrock excavation or blasting work a pre-construction blast condition survey of existing structures and conditions within 500 feet of blasting areas will be performed by the Contrnctor and designated representatives of CESWF. ■ The survey shall consist of a description of interior and exterior conditions with appropriate photographs and/or video for documentation as pntt of the record. Descriptions shall locate cracks,damage or other existing defects find shall include information to make it possible to determine the effect,if any,that the construction operations mny Irnve on the defect. Upon completion of fill tock excavation and blasting work,the Contractor shall make a similar examination of properties and structures where complaints of damage have been received or damnge claims have been filed. o Blasting Plan Submittals-Prior to blasting,a hlostingpian shall be snbmitled to CBSWF t and shall include(at it minimum): ■ Drilling patterns. ( A Number,location,inclination,diameter,and depth of drilled holes. ■ Amount,type,and distribution of explosives per hole. ■ Sketches to show blast locations at the site and relative to the existing structures. ■ Powder factor;time delays;weight of explosives in each delay. ■ Sequence of firing. ■ Time of blast. • Total pounds of explosive. ■ Methods of transportation,storage and handling of explosives. ■ Manufacturer's data sheets for all explosives,primers and initiators to be employed. ■ Type of blasting machine to be used and when Inst tested. ■ Scaling and stabilization procedures and methods to remove or stabilize all rock on(lie cut face which is loose,hanging,or which creates a potentially dangerous situation. Drilling of the next llft shnil not be allowed until rock scaling and stabilization has been completed. ■ Any other pertinent data indicating Contractor's Intent and purpose to produce smooth and sound surfaces of excavation. ■ Plan for(lie fragmentation of large boulders and rubble. ■ Calculations of anticipated ground vibration levels at existing structures and facilities. • Methods for protection of the existing structures and utilities including special perimeter control blasting procedures. Include a depiction of areas where such l measures will be used,he.Main Street Bridge,Utility Crossings. • Methods of matting,covering of the blast aren in open excavations,and/or stemming to prevent fly rock and excessive air blast overpressure. • Methods for confirming depth of drilled holes within specification tolerance with j special requirements within a 25 feet zone on either side of the utility crossing centerline. Within this zone the drilling depth will be limited to a maximum depth of 1 feet below the channel bottom grade. To assure this tolerance Is maintained this zone will be clearly marked on the ground prior to and throughout blasting in the area with depth measurements taken for each bole. • Copy of all blasting permits obtained. • Name and address of Contractor's represenlntive to which any claims for damage due to blasting should be addressed. • Contingency plan for lightning hazard. • Details of an audible advance signal and traffic management systems. • A revised plan shall be produced if conditions change,the results of blasting do not produce the intended results,or blasting causes excessive dispersal of material. o Blast Monitoring Report-Within 24 hours following each blast,the Contractor shall submit to CBSWF a Blast Monitoring Report Including; r • A copy of strip chart(or other permanent record of velocityltime waveform)with calibration and monitoring record marked with the date,time and location of the ( blast as well as the monitoring location. • Type of rock blasted,and round length,Including amount of sub drilling If any. • Type,quantity,and weight of explosives,powder factor,total number and type of delays used,number of holes for each delay period,maximum charge per delay, stemming used and type of detonators. • An evaluation of blast results indicating breakage,perimeter control results, depth of break and planned adjustments to the blast design for the next blast. ■ Comments regarding misfires and unusual results or effects. o Vibrntion and Blast Monitoring • The Contractor shall provide seismographs and monitor peals particle velocities and air blaot overpressures during all rock excavation operations. Is A minimum of three approved seismographs shall be provided at specified locations to record particle velocity simultaneously along three mutually perpendicular axes and air-overpressure.The seismograph equipment shall be Internally calibrated with it trinxial orthogonal velocity transducer with a flat frequency response from 2 to 200 Hz and a 2-Hz-response microphone.The equipment shall be capable of recording a permanent,real-lime record of blast- induced ground vibration and air-overpressure.Seismographs slinll have velocity transducers capable of measuring particle velocities as high as g fps and air- overpressure as high ns 140 dB(Unearscale). • The seismographs,calibrated within 6 months of the time of use. r • Intensity of air-overpressure measured adjacent to the nearest occupied surface structure shnll not exceed 130 dB(2 Hz Linear scale). Threshold and Limiting Values for vibration monitoring at typical adjacent structures: t Threshold Value Limiting Value ' 1,5 in/sec over 40 Hz 2.0 in/sec over 40 Hz j 1.25 in/sec,30-40 Hz 1.5 in/sec,30-40 Hz 0.75 in/sec,20-30 Hz 1.0 In/sec,20-30 Hz Threshold and Limiting Values for vibration monitoring tit Main Street Bridge: Threshold Value Limiting Value 2.5 In/sec(blasts%v/in I00ft) 5.0 in/sec(blasts Win 100ft) 1.5 in/sec(blasts> 100ft) 3.0 in/sec(blasts> 100f1) Threshold and Limiting Values for vibration monitoring at Atmos gas line: Threshold Value Limiting Value 2.5 in/sec 5.0 in/sec ■ Threshold and Limiting Values for vibration nwnitoring at City and private utilities: Threshold Value Limiting Value 2.5 iudsec 5.0 in/sec Contractor shall takespeciftc actions if the Threshold Value is reached and shall take all necessary steps so that the Limiting Value is not exceeded. Scaled Distance(SD),distance/square root of maximum lbs/delay,shall be established based on the initial blasting and the distance to the closest structure or 1 underground utility and the charge weight that does not damage tiny adjacent structure or utility.The established SD shall be used for all blasting associated with this particular portion of the project. ■ Blasting shall not be permitted within 200 ft of locutions where concrete has been placed in the preceding 24 hours.Blasting shall not be permitted within 40 ft of concrete structures until the concrete has attained the specified design strength. o Blasting Procedures • All parties shall notify CBSWF,TRWD,and the City 46 hours prior to any blasting operations. • Blasting operations shall be performed under the direct supervision of a blaster licensed in the State of Texas. Blasting operations shall be in full compliance with applicable state and local laws,regulations,ordinances and practices. • Clear blast area and stop traffic on the Main Sl Bridge during blasting within 500ft until ail clear is sounded. • Explosives shall be stored,handled and employed in accordance with Federal, State and local regulations. • All blasts shall be covered with woven steel cable or steel-cable and ribber tire blasting mats.Alternate methods to control fly rock may be used upon approval by the Contracting Officer or Administrative Contracting Officer(ACO). ■ If tiny flyrock or blasted material is thrown blasting shall be suspended until the t Government has approved the Contractor's revised blasting pian showing revisions to the procedure adequute to reduce the flyrock.Stemming shall be conducted as required to prevent flyrock. Care shall be taken at lire excavation limits to minimize over break nud fracturing the bedrock beyond the excavnlion limits.Pre-splitting air smooth wall blasting methods should be used to maintain side slope geometry. a Subdriling depth shall be maintained to minimize subgrade disturbance,and protect nearby utilities.Special requirements are required within a 25 feet zone on either side of any utility crossing centerline. Within this zone the drilling depth will be limited to n maximum depth of 1 feet bellow the channel bottom grade, To assnro this toleranco is maintained this zone will be clearly marked on the ground prior to and throughout blasting in the area with depth measurements taken for each hole prior to be placement of charges. Project Delivery Team:CESWF construction management and geotechnical PDT members have actively participated in the dialog on blasting requirements including with the CFW Bridge Blasting consultant on issues pertaining to the Main Street Bridge and other utility concerns within the North Segment. Conclusion:CESWF PDT and TRWD recommend thnt the preceding recommendations be used in the developmental!the final technical specification for rock removal via blasting techniques.Development of the technical specification will occur as part of the finial design efforts of Segment B in late 2012 and 2013.Ln addition,it is recouumended that CESWF.TRWD,and the City coordinate a communication plan in advance of the actual blasting work for informing the public and adjacent property owners of the work. PX Y ZZ ' Ken McCleskey,P.G.,USA -Fort Worth District Date Acting Chief,Geolechnica Branch David Marshall,P, „Tarrnnt Regional Water District Date Engineering Services Director Attachments: 1. Atmos-Blasting Meeting Notes(414/2012)1 Email(4116/2012) 1 �® c 35534 rl`�l� � i � x � a F a i��,dji' 11' p d e r101i 5 'j1.1 a g rc A lot lQr i g8'H tgt5i�u €�iggf p c l S $ �atr� 4 i Z w awn• 6 CC C/3 uP wo. Wl3 J - p W d N a. U ?: 0;.q Cnwa ® ® 0 Q z Q O � ���4CZl�®�...��nimRB'yf •Pj F W ; U- Z J to .� c !ro co III a: � Q o uj CD Z EL r� Q Vd cc 6riH+++ S ......O°x..... W1G1lxlxllSQ{tfOIN WI.4NaYNaMW['tNLLNG11VepAwIN h4U15°/ILNI MN xCtlil [IOrA1[ I�TY11»I i • Z5 T�11•.I CID lP9f1¢ l��f t Lu s c 8#fl 114<s.1 J IL �1�i`i,L{ o� d `� Fop �� a a oe®a©ezeerrimanna%emtfa7■ooe � �—• k E A i B��r� t o� �� f Z y lSIt ill ,�33��� 3i5e =.Aa $� s:: 1681 oil In 1111 if Iia���� ENE 9a wrW !I qqi ` ^AYr cge k r�yy O ab 68 n X r aaPill a' ;a as i t , 4 g `rp g� 1s a g €# 6r�� g! Sig r - .9 Perm p ; lit #'a � �gYp� ¢o§ aaXlES #R�6 ¢y cz q HIM, `!�� %$8s q=sG a5r r4Y ¢ pcAll p ha � gy45 5ia RIM q 4y a� &yy � gg E9at�.��� �E# p � �c�(i" 5� Q Jig iQ rR#e :IN Ell e�h e$�#5� �r�I 1 0,�$ �s_.1e will AI_ i J J M J 1 J n • r Y � - M n 4 d�z py of fik�q91hBO gg ass r a 7 q r. q 8 r i �",' # 5 # Q •f fs .s z n � k� ill # ( gEct ff qqqq�t d¢ A� gg Y r1 ' I r� , y0 p}t A g c h �p ig yF E g g h�r�a i kl 9�a� � _ c % Iva Foil @ till g ga i S ff a 6 a # e a I�g �: @ ¢ � � ��� 55 r El � 21 1 a1+� pI d gyp= a 1 A1 1 19 It Gp�BqS h r � q6p Ayr ;Q yfqH ris 0I W. Ta V I I fill 1-1 �RHINIE", �n th#r�41 gin r 1191,10 5.3 1 ii ilill 1k � ¢ _ d w j J _ _ ± _ d d d JRmtgnttgMrBMi Mtl-IMAf.9•�t4�tLLm.l1V.M+•tlh4UttIXLLM1 ~N�L� tmetlit(•q �1 E Q 0 i ,safely LU 26 CO LU ., 191€#{!r ! i a �.RCO € { ill ---N1IN ----t I I I I I I , i 19 ws 1, I I I .•• I I I ` 'I �11eH 1 I i I � l •I �.. I- • -I 1: - 1 1 1. I uale..h 1 1 I1 1 • I • , I• mipaww "� I it 1 �, 1 • 1 1O •�I '[�«�1tt•I dam.,.�,• r i' •. II,; i• i •; �drtA:19lLIlwC04413m Nu•Ifmu3rw9 ti^�0•SFYlaro,lwgn+rN4YItl01111M11 waR.t 01MS ��MfMN p 1 $ N o ® S _ •W, rpco4,1 co 1• yi iitp j ; 1I..��r�� 3 �v � Q a�t � g SOLI.OLOWOOZ619-131)133HS33S-3NJ1Ha1MN SOCtULOItOBZ6l9.13f1133HS33S 3NIlH�1tlW jEp � IG 1 y 1 I _ - ' `. I ,III-„'' •q I nwonuols ' 7I C ...-._ 1•6. t - ._ - +ar.rl mama 1 � R! . :-�� • :• •• nu.rr nsran vas 'Lj` c 1 1 I L/ it No 3 sk It. % / n -•a: ' ,/ yes ;! � r I � ' -`7• .I. '/ J`h i i � -'�-, � . lar. j ' i. :;• ice•.=", ! ..+n+anl,lawvla.a-woenr..d.�rar.w.l,..w,.w mrew.uw, rreri:wr ala. MCYHW PP 1 p � e 7.16 LU � a � �r � (s •iYt3�' 3 ' j �! i GIS Z� � dp� o YG i� reLrn ° t Y uj 9w L"OLOIL•OOZBL913n.L33HS 339-3MI1401VW 90CVOLOI L-09ZBL9-13f1133HS 33S_3MIHO1VW r� l E . ! NIwYO/Mla''l.l'a 10wi/1 � I I Z Mgr U p K U mem I 51 J a IF CKt� 1Aoi/ r; i 1y: 0,0 . all � I s I 40ELOLDLL08ZBL913f1133NS33S 3NIlFI�lVW KEC-�OLOLL ZBL9-13f1133V$33S�-3N ga1VW= ✓emwlNseaestea/a/a-em�mwv�eu reviaauwarv�ra+wasamn•1 rca axes r. OKI Elf aLM 555 asfF,op�p� LL. W coP 1' "C it �; a 99g cn >i y�d!a�lit I SIB ® , ' > W $ y3`'T1`t34'J 4J�n F, EiEt-O[Oi i-OBZBi9-Hl1133HS 33S-3Alfli'i�11M7 1091rlvaawu lYnll j � 'J'il'LY I ]IaJY)1Y41d)W1Isn), m ( H _ u+nJ°eumf oJxw.vim J 'Irn.a _ mfJwYAnnu m°u 1 .Ja — 3ralY)JWt.f lMJJfR)1 I 9 1 s 14.1 1 I a WI ' I I o I ti i a Amu ! JLY ° '•�' ' O In3�AOBAaTJU YYOU''iY.f !" Yl•A)fAWJY1V1.InY AJ nrAlilYi 1 MVJ1q IYIOli Intl AnMYmfi I 8 'IYf1A I J 1� 1 1Yn.r - -----., a �: � � i I •.i I . � 6 b �.�\i •: I I j \ I rrYwirs I 1 1 ! !! 1 I I 1 A7 !1 b 1 L-BLOLL-OBZBLQ-1 (1133HS33S-3Nf1F1�1 W aEL�LO��ti-BBZ6��8-13l1�133HS�3S-3�NIlH�;W � e ufexnarolrnfn�ronf oU•rwumusYmrrrwAaeuwa+u w.yAfV1H°WJ„y As scJA �illitr^ G CI FQ'f6k : > F. �j r.—gig s91 � r1� cr l_l_l 0 9 9 $ Rasp r• ! ! Nor ¢ dl 5 oe .->i,c: rte— --• � _-__•• :I •— � �` 7 �F , r II _ — ---- o7—., 1- 1�.1; els. ¢,101 WC , '` �� � ,�r � ��_ ' �. � $ }�(�'?��r���!►—1 � � �;j � _ it�_r-= s l7p. -• „3 flat I I ! nr Y 6Yrd3 4 �4 rp��$r13 Ip 'rmz ---F � _lad. ( y s2, r �.. y r1,1 !I k � ' � o.,,ow•, I+l..,,- :i o •• ��u��f�.. 'I {��(n� ��//♦. q ��i'$$9i Bill E�4 iq�l �L- i` ,A„ •���.' % r� NMI 'f% .c3 y if 1. :. -go {�- ------ ''°fn`•.. B s ��F•nnV c..�� :3q n i l � ,y eft �� _ ..,.f... je s �6—� '��• P �• ff �' o 25 W 01 4 .�8��r ; �i'�� •�..i � :ice§�Ax� !� -- � � x E .. I 1 i . I I ¢ ,�,. YSd1d�aS�: ,�� � Sr Y �� � S• I I t i � I 1 z I ' 7i .1 R �x ul +�, I r. �^'L a5; 1♦ 'r^,! '�Lw� l�'., •C o •fFl����fi y ti' '•f Y �rrr.- �'' � • � � _ _ ' i ..�',u '°�' gg +- f Gib JAI UL/L----'" 5u41`010 TE n 2 y{K u u m 7a, r +i"s -Ir n ` N H1Ll'N r ro( r+ou y{ ./i 761a� �cl F i VM'l7r1-WI,IMNIM7IN.W•YMIM.9 r/�}NLL OIOIIYeRN aAIIIIAMOIIMI M_M+ w.,ym. > 1 �2N GM VOLOLL•OBZBLS13n133HS33S-3NIli01VM1 BOEL-OLOLL-OOZow3n133HS33S-3N1401VW IT VIM 16 Vd �zt •5- mrvz 'r. ti 1}�� Gil ��— ! agys i fl n m - ---_---- =l i II' 1 Fling- Is It- In In .-- '-._-_.. mi ''`l' ✓.. 11A L 4 gig, I LL —� �•' {�L3��Y5��'"�i is � �� •�. I !!� tj E 4 ' aV 4,--c 1' t 1 .: JJJ _ be in 9LBL94LBL•LOEL-OLOLL-OOZGLB13f1139HS339-NOI1V(1NLLNOO!!O:11 LOELOLOLL-OOZ l0.13n133HS33S-3NT1HO1VW JIItOCtbW11M[�IfiM.i/.tl•�i1lWlxa Wcy)y,,yLxrol{Nq,NwYYR1WlNg11Y11 ,V,ISG, CixnxR C:) ee"Fc k Ids o 9 I S! 5 o„ .:,1; ��• ''ytiI: ; d a i of E�' Q S i�E"9Ef I I I I'OH IS F�6i,j ai � yR ��rcuSa LLI tl o es € y� �i i i la. gig gg �k yy f 4 G S<E r F 6 d x C/� o �l��W I q�q i s wRIF .� E2 U)LU � t o b p • � � `��`� f� �iti3 �i�Isl�f�1 tl g I '�� K � P:�� �3 � ud� 636 ua-o(D1t-Dwmo-1311133HS 339-3MIHD1VW 4 'IRE 7 b ❑ t � � yt' Nt t y , t I r, 8 Sf3YjYg s TA Gg° ='8.. e - I\ 81 9w CAY . \ 4' :!; le mud; .6- i � q1� �e{F ,4 Y `t nrorYW Jr rt• "A1�7E �';�e�=;l��, I: •' —�v � PIN Jig- 61 s�c • rt. l i lg'� Ib 6g ,a5a�l,- 1:7.3m, �S � ' t 8 p 'tlt g��:Sao.gBr, —�• Z I 6 ! I 1 s�uarut�r J, II l J:33tll4 Ntl' _ j tr tt � r- CL -_� 'I ytKZ •. 'Y I. ��e I� l\ ,��"�1 ��-iR� I I � °�" t "� —� 11�e—^ /� 1—loe5 J 1�: —1�Y 'S$LZ h� • l lQu - . ` iil`C.g Z— 4EhZ-- —r f J�.,.T^y r I� t ► of � i I ? �+II II f 2:1 tl 'se��. l Jz✓. _Z �- Z--4 i OEl-OLOL4-Oa Bla-13(1133HREowoLROyFousi913a133HS,33S'FNIIH WWC19lMiplet911N.�Yl1MAR1l�+rJneuam�wan.ro�wluauNl na tt'lY[ uanw ,+ar.rww i i I c p g G � �•+s x`1`4, � d _ : 1 !�1 6 y ` 6¢ s , o_ tly � E [1«R9!!!j � a s � 4 94 5<Z= g f CO vLU E 6 WIN its Ie L VOLOWO9Z669-13n 133HS 33S-3NIl HO1dW _-4 L_ __ y a A \EES ` .n / :y ewu/r �• -i, tipco I 01 _ y ; zo Eli uj NT � •— •��--� ' tri � , OLL 33 / AG zi qr i 1 Y a� T�ji 3 I ML V KU-OzOWoBZ669-13n-L33HS 33S-NOI1VnNI1NOO UOd �O'•tfl<IOtISBdIlAl.i+al-Oft.NlMS:+WIJ•.itll�ldiV+nN+.MI/MY1f0A1Nl IY KGI'1 �� I � � E @ @ "e cr ■ �'� e � L m 6 9448�j9tt=�1L��� � a fill ��n � W a- LL— f ° 'moo / �] d o e [o g F gill 8 1 A 0 d � K�<_�' s a o s8 Y $y !n 11r pi§F? 1 q€>Qs ■" W im§ ; Z 'S �tll If) 'F p1k� NO,! ;3`x kid ¢ ;° fill 3 c � ElE6-OLOLvosm69-on 133HS 33S 3N11 HO1HW ? �,pr ii.�I �•'�� N�� ID ��'� 4YIY .I r— YJ. ate_ :«_15419 Ne wy`� I Iw r 'Vi 7711- —' .� :� I I I H Z . I—– im_ _ a r- 11.1 Acn W � _ g _y _. --- -------- — f�kl f _ _ ,__ f I - -_- Z _J•f_-h– __ I; ;�.1.'. UU ; , s !� .� ..�is I r_ JA ,E-!t:,7�- LL I L----- �� IM1� it'�• � '3G I�� I '–.•_ A. MU-OLOLL OQM9-mn 133HS 33S-3NIl Hyl/W WYtnslm t•a�taan3,•Y-■mlutn�.A*caerldamwwrwNwnsauni n�,n»r, ttww ,ea+aer.r c 9 � ktSE Cie 9z LL Fla iM C> LL- jig t W L ,a:� E 61F��°x° z p gsgn 1 f it �'3I t 9 Itl £ O .`,�7u [F%Ff3F-LLLip , � j I5 i Q @R@ ®� I ( �t�'Jo� w ! e' isp �L_ �4 r i g u o' YY Q 94HLLJ IM ` I 9� ME 1 T ' A 8 �J � i• /• � �t _ - - _...' SSS •b a [i 6 63 a r-- - a I � ...till. --�.e-_•-._._,_ 1-_---_—_� L LCL-OLoI L-OQZ619.13f1 V 606 L-OLO t POQZ6l9-13fl'90C t-OLOL L-OOZ619-13f1133H6 336.3NPHDIVW?iOd .�u:v°I:om:mrtn,nr�Innnow..swiRro:wAnu„>uhtwucnAu nvmua �Rt LCU, fill I rt I Li A-f fill 01 war it �� + I (oil ............. ----------- IN ------------- i co M - 1 E I' ZZs� m J W 0 1ii✓I- �i ¢a¢a moo- I' ox Ljj ! + e 6�n i i t --- --•--' _ -sem.._._ i_»u .M w—�•"�iNiaoN 'e ----- 7f� eel G 1 _30ul .2 e� 1 To, _ •---- - ca.. l� i�aau Is i 1 Itll � �01 ]• i LL � •�•� i,i �rnntitef+trcusmaw-c.mrnrua�rmioeouwnu rw n>ucuoniwi rtws� �y I �bL m \r g3r11t� a 2g 3 k3.W 5 E a a zZ q w y� Os f�ti y •( � 's a �n�2 " ![ o [� � s ll HAM Hi t bF� W ° ; g[ R K� r �"iFt FFP 45 � rn� I dI Is: € y W IofHe I uJ r j, y ti ij ..t.., ,:.•.}F m t 08 OT '8" •/a vnuwou I • i' ��uty I l�Iman orxtaeoll lihtiQYrHDll xa • •\' - I� 1031�Mnrtl�f 300E ll31Yn11[il 1 E I � f faal.tutnmtli ae oil vtw.t xa \t y f,o�' ~j 1t13rt1Yl14xal etOU ew at xt I tog :Q rig ,J _ i ft�g���• 1 1 s g 121 Is `Gtr' -' 4. •� �, ;•` , 5 S 9 1 8 8 8 p I .das[[raralwxtt�rarw[�rrwartw�n�teucrtwvnxa/:wnsoruNl [u[1:s1x �tltan�[x j i I Exhibit C EXHIBIT 4 Form of Adjustment Schedule FWCC Project Location: Trinity River Vision,White Settlement,using Kansas and Welsenberger and Viola Project Limits Carroll St From: Dakota St To: Estimated Costs: Total costs 2,585,468.69 City of Ft Worth 1,292,734.34 Note:Plans, Specifications and Estimate must be attached to support the Estimated Costs. The supporting documentation must show Items, quantities, units and unit costs. I The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the anticipated dates by which Utility's facilities that are in conflict with the above project limits will be adjusted. The dates below assume that the City has acquired all necessary right-of-way for the project, that sufficient plans indicating the proposed Improvements have been submitted to Utility,and that design changes necessitating material utility facility redesign do not occur. Utility Company: Atmos Energy Anticipated Construction Start Date: August 19, 2013 Anticipated Duration of Construction: 14 weeks Anticipated Construction Completion Nov.28,2013 Date: The information provided above is strictly an estimate and is provided to City solely for City's planning purposes. This form is not intended to create any legally binding commitments on either Utility or City,nor to waive any rights Utility or City might otherwise possess. If there is a conflict between prior submitted dates and those shown in this form,the dates set forth above should be used for City's planning purposes. 41 —� Authodzed-UMy Representattve Date PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Trinity River Vision-White Settlement City of Fort Worth,TX(Torrent County) Completed by:UEI (Config 1261446) 11/2612012,Revised 08108/2013,Rev e,EKO Complete Project MAI Ballpark Estimate Basis L Qty Unit Description Un(t Cost 4122 feet PIPE POLY 6 PE 2406 SDR11 40FT S 0.22 /foot $25,638.84 1384 feet PIPE POLY 4 PE 2406 SDR11 40FT $ 2.77 /fool S3,778.2B 1412 feet PIPE POLY 2 PE 2406 SDR11 250FT S 0.87 /fool $1,228.44 500 feet PIPE POLY 3/4 PE 2406 SDR11 40FT S 0.19 /foot $95.00 j 2100 feet PIPE ERW t0.75"X 0.385W CS BARE BEV DRL X42 S 28.10 /fool $54,978.00 40 feel PIPE ERW 2.375"X M154W CS BARE BEV DRL X42 S 2.61 /fool $100.40 0 each ELL 2 CS 150 90 DEG WPB S 4.76 /each $38.08 4 each COUPLING 2 CS 150 WPB S 8.13 /each SSZ52 4 each 8"-3 WAY SPHERICAL TE-E,150 ANSI, CS,TOW S 1,935.00 /each $7,740.00 12 each ELL BF 6 90 DEG PE 2406 S 23.15 /each $277.80 2 each ELL BF a 45 DEG PE 2406 s 22.98 leach 545.90 2 each TEE BF 6 PE 2406 $ 33.92 /each $87.84 4 each CAP BF a PE 2406 $ 21.26 /each $05.00 18 each e"COUPLING,EF,BF PE 2405 $ 60.58 /each 51,090.44 2 each W TRANSITION CS PE 2406 $ 176.00 /each $352.00 3 each 6"X 4"REDUCER,BF.PE 24o6 E 1a.12 leach $54.38 4 each ELL BF 4 90 DEG PE 2406 $ 10.20 /each $40.80 2 each ELL BF 4 4S DEG PE 2406 $ 10.16 /each 520.32 1 each TEE BF 4 PE 2406 5 11.98 leech $11.88 4 each CAP BF 4 PE 2406 $ 8.80 /each $35.20 1 each 4"X 3"REDUCER,BF,PE 2406 $ 7.65 /each $7.56 2 each 4"X 2"REDUCER,BF,PE 2408 5 8.34 leach $12.68 4 each 4"COUPLING,EF,BF 2406 S 23.01 /each $92.04 1 each 3"COUPLING,EF,BF 2406 $ 13.96 /each $13.96 2 each 2'-3 WAY SPHERICAL TEE,150 ANSI, CS,TDW S 1,000.00 /each $2,000.00 4 each 2"COUPLING,EF,BF 2406 S 7.96 /each $31.84 8 each ELL BF 2 90 DEG PE 2406 S 5.85 /each $40.86 2 each TEE BF 2 PE 2406 S 4.45 /each $8.90 2 each CAP BF 2 PE 2406 $ 4.23 /each $6.46 1 each T'TRANSITION CS 2406 $ 14.78 leach 514.76 2 each T'COUPLING,EF,BF 2400 $ 7.96 leach $15.92 7 each 17 LB HIGH POTENTIAL MAGNESIUM ANODE 5 57.70 leach $403.00 12 each 3 LB HIGH POTENTIAL MAGNESIUM ANODE S 28.60 leach $343.20 8,920 feel WIRE 1112 CU YLW SOLID THHN 500171- S 0.14 goal $068.60 1 each Small DollarMateda)(estimated at 5%of listed material and Includes 5.001/. $4,984.01 small dollar items such as:Tools,P/L Markers,Curb boxes(last lead boxes), Gloves and other consumables,etc) Stores Loading 4.00% $4,188.37 Freight 2.501/6 $2,616.60 Stores Overhead 4.00% $4,458.69 Slate Sales Tax 8.26'/. $8,834,70 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $124,580.83 COMPANYLABOR 500 hours Operations 5 50.00 /hour $25,000.00 400 hours Engineering/Conslrue9on Management S 70.00 /hour $28,000.00 80 hours Right•ol--Way $ 60.00 /hour $4,800.00 40 hours Environmental-Review and Mgt. $ 85.00 thour $2,600.00 1 lot z8ene0ls ON 54.23% $ 32,754.92 /lot 532,754.02 TOTAL COMPANY LABOR COSTS $93,154.92 RIGHT-OF-WAY 20000 IIA2 Temporary Work space $2.00 10"2 $40,000.00 4 day Contract ROW Agent $ 750.00 /day $3,000,00 TOTAL R-O-W COSTS(payments to landowners) $43,000.00 TRV While Settlement Cost Ealknale 0731 2013ekoas(2).xisx CONSTRUCTION 1 not Installation of approx.4122'of 6"PE,with 2100'of 10"casing,1384'of 860,620.00 /lot $680,520.00 4"PE and 1412'of 2"PE and 22 of 314"Poly Sys Lns and 3 of 2"Poly Sys Lns by approved bore and/or open trench method includes,but not limited to stdnging,fusing,taring,pullback,trenching,strength testing, backrdi,hot tapping,restoring and reseeding cost.Includes two(2) mobatizations. 1 not Kill out mains and removal In Phase 1,wlihin levee foolphril along While 50,000-00 $60,000.00 Settlement. 1 not Kill out mains and removal In Phase M,within levee footprint TBD,note 09 1 not Paving repairs under roadway that gas mains are being relocated are $0.00 Included M Contractor bid. 1 not TO Williamson stopples,lapping for bypass 65,000.00 $65,000.00 1 not Pig launcher and receiver(lemp)Smart pig to delermine location. 300,000.00 $300,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS(per scope of work) $1,066,624.00 CONTRACTEXPENSE 0 days Xray 5 1,350.00 /day 50.00 500 hours ProleclManagement $ 118.00 Hour $69,000.00 300 hours Engineering 5 99.00 /hwr $29,700.D0 260 hours Drafting $ 96.00 /hour $24,000,00 50 hours Project Director(P.E.reviews and seals dwgs.) $ 121.00 Baur $6,060.00 40 tours Pro)eclAdministralor $ 50.00 /hour $2,320.00 40 hours Project Controls 6 99.00 /hour $3,960.00 500 mtie VeNde Mileage(Engineer) $ 0.60 /mile $250.00 30 week Environmental Inspection 5 1,025.00 /reek $30,750.00 80 day 3rd Party Inspection 4 861.00 /day $52,080.00 10 day Survey(Pipeline Cenlerilne Staking) 6 2,000.00 /day $20,000,00 TOTAL CONTRACT EXPENSE COSTS $220,910,00 MISCELLANEOUS 0 101 Gas Loss/Allemale Fuel $ 50.00 not $0.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS COSTS ;x0,00 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 0,55 MIMI IndIrec (see note 8) Corporate Overhead(Labor,Corp ARG,BU ARG) (see note 6) 35% 5544,304.01 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $1544,341.01 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJCCT COSTS 99 G Other Franchise Fee 6% $104,972.34 Interest Carrying Charge 18% $381,049,69 TOTAL OTHER $480,021,93 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $2,68. 468 Fall City of Fort Worth(11) 505E $1,202,734.34 gsauMotiorWCommenls 1)No walerbody crossings and does not Include costs for karst discovery 2)One general conlrealor from inception to completion and prices contingent on availability of contractor at time of award 3)Estimate does not Include costs for holding schedule In extreme weather conditions 4)Construction Estimate does not Include costs assodsled with SWPPP Permitting A �? 5)Existing pipe shall be removed under levee,then it will be abandoned In place 6)Corporate Overhead Rate varies at time of Item cosL 7)Materials Pricing based on McJunkin Price Masler. 6)Killouls of mains for Phase 1,within footprint of levee. includes use of select backfill to 95%protector.Included In Contractor fee 9)Klllouls of mains for Phase 1,within footprint of levee outside of White Settlement Indudes use of select backfill to 95%proleclor 10)Smart pigging operation to locate proposed main under future COE levee. I1)FW WRR crossing permll at 1 OD%to Cky of Fort Worth It will be added later when crossing cwslia known. TRV While Settlement Cast Estimate 07312013 ekoaa(2)Asx ERF �k +yq �� r d I t 4s444� �b5i w _ yyy 8 z IY � p�pspEBl��x I �4IJ�1} O f f f��z e ¢ l.L, r a,��!•� � fififi E�1 ��S fit!j o LU r l,��it 0� y 1gg 99 G lY a `etdil Y I�. C UJ Y Z Z F— O Z W ay o t {1• � ,r�`��i j . 9 CL � � � Wdto Ol �E ` ■: ,,r ZZ ° yW ~ F ,r .. +{ U QCO 0Z> 3z u 9 � X U > 0 � � m 022: 0 w W Q7 VJ ° cr— rr (L 8� tR� �12P z bna'uaFr�� �ru00000u rc 1r�o�i+eno-in�ra•r�nu�•a�snvarsnrurnvLymrvnmr�rAwa�+ovuw� rn s�+u�i cwwi wrvn•.. ! Is p s� —!QF19s� if CC r I i .ir eitl`S•1 �I� �. u �bi IN I i ffd (I Oa K3 O = Lu s g cotasfi]�` mw Hy F ® i 0 l�f0q £T;'l �v I!t I 00+LL 4'VJ.S 3NI1 V13J-VY4 I ' 1 1 1 -1 - I 1 1, \ ___.L.111 �': 1 iJ1-�'i!''1-I•��,'1>� � a `'• 1 1£ qx It iv is is 4 Iad y� i yam16 ] ♦� �g�r gY b a - e ti .1 a {tq U d I( r� - ,/ ••133tl15)f3�VA 9 �$� ! @ �3 ..ctrl-9- �w-CCIC9 1h; Wj Pal _. �uG G nww1 _ �; �j 9{� 0' 81 rt i-,-_ .1\ j f f i y.,-L ugL=•Y'a�+�'�' i I All.• �i �"'d�`�;�� i �r r sNO r 15 ' C d I itiJ, j Y � I Y 1] •• ! 1 1 u� � Fj j� a 1�� ! Jv ��'�f'Q !, f^!. FRY � �• ,���' ' I Y 1 • � c Ys 1 \\ ,.r� / �� 1'.�__ .,,� �� ..a .1.33U13llOtitlV� a, t a �� _ I 11�� � •Fs �-n���r"t�` .�r• ' LESS�t 1 } c nssnnsnssfnaaa]sat:s,tnssssn:fsssssnsnn saran�� sssssswa].lsusn afsfmm�amu]ss F LM 02 i Cs p Ld Cf) wo wC11 I in 111 loll 09+6U"VIS 3NII HO1VV4 re— -----------4.i, ii Ni 2A ......................................................... 44 A33MLS W 'tera Ilk TIR WT It zw LW39nu X. d Y lla� IT oz, —4 00+LLL VIS 3N11 HOIVIN 03 yli ft LL_ 12 ED fill F ISS US tz bbJ rA Of I J_ 4-N 011 A Ifig jf JO t I N1!1 is J '441 wau ng pt; 9! • Vp"t gi ll I UYj P 0241k, -L± f.* �, "0 ip E.V A 471 Dull m F- r. y 09+6U VIS 3NII HOiVW } t i m AN �� •* � � i'�r{nl9 �-ta''} g d T a F�OW a pp• 6 ,z,z MEMU 5"dpIll d I dna I Vill ui i a Sr�Illt� W > cnLij Iel�ttx k�b� ...._....... _.-.:. lot,l-6gogl-LIvLzLian133HS33S-OS+OI'tl1S3NIlHO1tlW LOhL•6fWOL-L4611.L-13nl33HS33S-09+0LV1S3NI1H0IVW IJ 16 �ooi9 I I }t} ���•a� ,1. 'k�s����`nV 6bt/•• memonm_� `•} + ti } ii k `1••�4p b 6 1 ` �3 $ .g-r I I e } av ri } } I I uuaaw f� ti ( Ik fr r 4T a � g s =L-69691-LDbLZt-sn.L39HS99S-NOl1`d MINDOMO3 o o n cfi n v .r -- i .amn•ugran}ss}?lrn)n3u-anusova}9Mw..�a+rnuawutmnMM.+M}�wl�muv�'I rNwa}�e nava � rcnm•n I i I 1 co O 9 1" tl LL— IOWN / 3 o v 7 LU `'rl; f� i I y �¢02iI 3`I Hp $ a 3 Si C/7 !Fr it04 r I i 8 CS rj i I w ��� erti�� IJ rT S • i ' .\ �' f 1 � �,'1 ,t 1 •l��\ �d 1 � e f ' - r•QT3 ` • rpba� s I f 1 , 1 7 _ 'nw Y-f'Ii 1 yu 1 'Mat F I i!lMli Al l7•—•J•—•—•—•—•�• M 133LL6 HIIHIMV rDi • # ' I . I :J33N1S dV3lCF33Nfl i .` ��• �'• , C F k��� �• � TQC^'i�L. r�:'�, W • ,�I ' ! N S• 99YL-69"9-Lo,vm-sn133HS339-os+olNIS 3NIlHDDM 90V1.69V9VLVIIIZVIR1133HS33S"09+MV1S3NIIHO1HW y N G T w /,IOIN/NM1•{N{iiN1M3 A�tl•0AN5'Y+A13RM•^us4 aINNNY1f111lwnRA�s•OI NYlHa11Yr1 I•Y 9L14[ CAM Ylyrsf/,•s/ i i g i �CD k XU) L�° VP If Sir � ¢ ¢1 1. } , fj I1 ff fit,k y I - i Uri Ik 3 i _+�• rl3aalsanw.w SS < •'4 L 1 12ia1S�BJ33a•J �1 � 0 l+ 011 ;k:�gg L,�4 .M ��t. ,to r _.I� i. + 1-. •.i�^j i N j 1 Vz Wi .. ._.....__. r to -------------- 4 ra•rnmrrmrar+�u.w•�ss•mnnwrnnmrxwri mw+aN.elwu�iNi mrtzc>t �w� i 3 E t Exhibit D EXHIBrr I Area of the Project See Attached Exhibit I if. i I 3 I EXHIBIT 1 AREA OF PROM Ur I � 00 ci 0/0 00 0 nnnn or raoiecr y 0 o � � s Oo a`�'�•� 469 °� ° 0 7 y `- �r }` • Ij 0 00 Do �L�[:I � o0a ` t✓ i ++ BYPASS CHANNELNf F] nui UU-/) 0 a Z f \ 1 q \ I '-LJ �J [ HlTE CN VI RD, � _u' O IrT 1 L i n f i . r , i C I ' I i i i Exhibit 2 # Accommodate any of the construction or Improvements described as part of the Central City Projects generally described as listed below: ! 1. US Army Corps of Engineers Bypass Channel--a 1.5-mile-long bypass channel that will be constructed to redirect flood waters around the low lying area near downtown,This project will Include:removal of the current levee systems,construction of a new channel with related levees, construction of flood gates and construction of a dam and lock at Samuels Avenue, 2. City of Fort Worth Bridge and Roadway projects located on Henderson Street,White Settlement ; Road and Main Street. Improvements at each of street locations include but are not limited to the ! following construction: a. New bridge construction at the US Army Corps of Engineers bypass channel f b. Roadway construction at each end of the bridges with transition back to existing road a c. Related retaining wall construction 3 d. Access road construction where needed e. Temporary paving for detours f. intersection and signalization Improvements j i i i I , a � I 3 # S, 7 t4 (S yi 1 r t r J5f1 i R y i i ! 4 t j , j1 i i 12 I i Y f EXIUBIT 3 Adjustments Necessary to Accommodate the Project . i Phase I—ITenderson Street and necessary Atmos Energy facilities in the vicinity Phase 11—North Main Street and necessary Atmos Energy facilities in the vicinity o Plisse IIT—White Settlement Road and necessary Atmos Energy facilities in the vicinity f I i s i I i D � i i i t 5t f f ' f � 1 f � I t i1 4 i i 1 r � f 13 c {� Hill Fr o S S z+ilf� fill sb a� � �' FF i z � 1..L Z W a ��• G n O ~ _ CO + acc 4 _ U Up ,F f� � o W � p til f.`.. i n` WU II j `n d❑ .'L':• +�: ., fin;:, `-�.;�a :r g; ; 14 (A a Ut ; i s F 1 i .+r�eu�rnrc+assn:o�3mwt•viaw�vnr»nv>s�w wm.i tac�W bwc wsmv+n.oswwtvs asrc,�wv�roaui.-urscanu cv cc»s „y„�x�ni; i i __ E ' S Jill RM "- ;g' 3 y 9 q I CO 3,R CO F. ILI 1n 4al ° 15$1 , jigFlod x` ! Ila x $ $ g t 1 SSW j eJ r s§ 6 a ; IN 5W,55 110 3% 1 a, q I x , Lk MIN � Y b �f3 09 g pill 11 a Fri ? 1 ai1� � $ 1H tl i U-1 UP-131i'AR ION 'Id 19 fj JUN INK F� $p �-�� z` € yy Vdh 3 t tam a" b r ' tl F �., z � �zvi -510 `$x 'w i t F411 gra E j 16 RH a 41 p t a ill t :lla g ea t • aF V � � g� " dg W. €< ;$1"p , ; jjylalliq so$$ $ t jj�j $a$ 4; a°,,�$ PIN 10 A AY �` S on g a� x iE� ii e � 8E e B $ .�< #fid a a y �- � � a a_} $ Nllg` sg 1111 b sC v. lk r . .t a • .. . i i MKlflt<f0[PffMVKO(ilYlA•VAiNl3l1 a1rJYffA+11N++1lhMW+uf+v)gayMlvfl.+OG1'.+1w3 MP+++�AMNIN1��+Ni(OfSlt 1'Nf41L11 •�M1fl(iM; 1 1 u� �f ! T s} L m { Kee k piI�#I �k �g r. 01 1 LL- LIJ a CO I LL ` I I as 9 8 IW � W 2 W y� G� _......i•_•_s EXISTING S/'WA RUNE _ � 15 NOS2i30N3H'N � y •rt W r/ w J tl WfORIc HFAO S 1 I wo & ad p .9 ¢p¢ c I s 1 Z N W r L jo eW g P {Ifl 41 k E i f s i t I s 1 I pntq♦tyt.�(yuW WMtyfgpWn(14ynnfA.�nr��ryfuWlNlt rv+TYttutGM nru:�nl .+�Po{ � I i I j i EXHIBIT 4 Form of Adjustment Schedule Atmos Energy Project#030.49687 ReC City Secretary ContrnctN'o.43103(MASTER i1TILITY ADJUSTMENT AGREEMENT) F � FWCC Project Location: Shamrock Project Limits S.H.#199(Henderson St.) From: Rupert , To: j Total Estimated Costs: $127,199.87 50%Eligible Reimbursement per TRV MUA:$63,599.94 Note:Plans, Specifications and Estimate inust be attached to support the Estimated Costs. The supporting documentation must show!terns, quantities, units and unit costs. E The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the anticipated dates by which Utility's facilities that are in conflict with the above project limits will be adjusted. The dates below assume that the City has acquired all necessary right-of-way for the project,that sufficient plans Indicating the proposed improvements have been submitted to Utility,and that design changes necessitating material utility facility redesign do not occur. i Utility Company: Atmos Energy t Anticipated Construction Start Date: 1 2107120 1 5 s Anticipated Duration of Construction: 14 ; K , F Anticipated Construction Completion 1212312015 Date: L The information provided above is strictly an estimate and is provided to City solely for City's planniug purposes. This form is not Intended to create atty legally binding commitments on either Utility or City,nor to waive any ' rights Utility or City might otherwise possess. t If there is a conflict between prior submitted dates and those shown in this form,the dates set forth above should be used for City's planning purposes. i 901 A r utt►alzed Utft Representaitive Date i I. F I r f 3`t 1 f, i 3 t i t EXHIBIT 4 Form of Adjustment Schedule Atmos Energy Project#080.49687 Ref.City Secretary Contract No.43108(MAgrER UTILITY AWUSTME,NT AGREEMENT) FWCC Project Location: Shamrock Project Limits S. H.#199(Henderson St.) From: Rupert To: Total Estimated Costs: $127,199.87 50% Eligible Reimbursement per TRV MUA:$63,599.94 Note.-Plans, Specifications and Estimate must be attached to support the Estimated Costs. The supporting documentation must show items, quantities,units and unit costs. The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the anticipated dates by which Utility's facilities that are In conflict with the above project limits will be adjusted. The dates below assume that the City has acquired all necessary righttof--way for the project, that sufficient plans indicating the proposed improvements have been submitted to Utility,and that design changes necessitating material utility facility redesign do not occur. Utility Company: Atmos Energy Anticipated Construction Start Date: 12/07/2015 Anticipated Duration of Construction: 14 Anticipated Construction Completion 12/23/2015 Date: The information provided above is strictly an estimate and is provided to City solely for City's planning purposes. This form is not intended to create any legally binding commitments on either Utility or City,nor to waive any rights Utility or City might otherwise possess. If there is a conflict between prior submitted dates and those shown in this form,the dates set forth above should be used for City's planning purposes. TGs,...-�• Gw�..-- /1�2D�t Authorised Representative '—� Date EXHIBIT 5 Form of Cost E sthnnte See Atbelied Exhibit 5 i i I I i CXW181T 5 ATMOS ENERGY/TRV RELOCATION AGREEMENT I i PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ! i TRV I j Tarrant County,Texas Almos ConBg Number: I MATERIAL I I TOTAL ESTIMATED MATERIAL COSTS $0 I ATMOS COMPANY LABOR TOTAL ESTIMATED COMPANY LABOR COSTS $D j I i RIGHT-OF-WAY i TOTAL ESTIMATED R-O-W COSTS $0 ' I � 1 CONSTRUCTION j TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 i CONTRACT EXPENSE I I TOTAL ESTIMATED CONTRACTOR EXPENSE COSTS $0 I MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL ESTIMATED MISCELLANEOUS COSTS $0 iTOTIAL-60ECTC06T6 .,Sol j ATMOS OVERHEADS ; TOTAL ESTIMATED OVERHEADS i 27— OTHER i INCOME TAX ADJUSTMENT $0 i CITY FRANCHISE FEE $0 TOTAL ESTIMATE COST OF PROJECT soll I S AssumpllonelCommenle 1) 2) i s) 4) I i 7) I i TRV at Rupert-Shamrock Rd w/2"steel gas main PROJECT COST ESTIMATE John Crane 080.49687 11/10/2015 MATERIALS WITH STORES(ITEMS ORDERED THROUGH MCJUNKIN OR ON ATMOS POs) DESCRIPTION SIZE QTY PRICE UNIT COST PIPE 2"PE,3408,SDR 11 2 250 $ 1 FT $ 245.00 HVTT 2"PE,SDR 11 2 2 $ 5 FT $ 10.00 ELL BF 2 X 90 DEG 2 2 $ 7 EA $ 14.00 CAP BF 2 X SDR 11 2 2 $ 3 EA S 6.00 TEE BF 2 X SDR 11 2 2 $ 5 EA $ 10.00 ANODES 30 3 2 $ 25 EA $ 50.00 WIRE TRACING&TAPE 50 $ 1 EA S 50.00 Marker balls 1 1 $ 20 ea $ 20 I MISC.PIPING MATERIALS(PIPE,VALVES,FOTINGS,GASKETS,BOLTS,ETC.) 1 5% EA $ 10 MATERIALS WITH STORES SUBTOTAL $ 415 tax 8.25% $ 34 freight 2.SO% $ 10 MATERIALS WITH STORES TOTAL $ 460 COMPANY LABOR(TOTAL MHECT CAPITAL LABOR) DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE UNIT COST ENGINEERING 20 $ 65 HR $ 1,300 FIELD OPERATIONS B $ 50 HR $ 400 } CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 16 $ 70 HR $ 1,120 ! ENVIRONMENTAL 8 $ 35 HR $ 280 FIELD CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR(FCC) 40 $ 49 HR $ 1,980 COMPANY LABOR TOTAL $ 5,080 1 CONTRACTLAOOR DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE UNIT COST CONTRACT ENGINEERING SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER 10 $ 134 HR 1,335 ) PROJECT MANAGER 30 $ 131 HR 3,915 j ENGINEER 10 $ 112 HR $ 11115 ( SENIOR CAD DESIGNER 24 $ 108 HR $ 2,580 t+t PROJECT CONTROL SPECIALIST 1 $ 111 HR $ 111 f CLERICAL 14 $ 88 HR $ 945 INSPECTOR(3RD PARTY) 5 $ 550 DAY $ 2,750 ENVMONMENTAL INSPECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION 10 $ 220 DAY $ 2,200 ENVIRONMENTAL(SWPPP,PERMIT PREPARATION,CONSULTING,ETC) 1 $ 10,000 DAY $ 10,000 ENIRONMENTAL REWEW(3RD PARTY) 20 $ 75 HR $ 1,500 SURVEY CREW 1 $ 1,750 DAY $ 1,750 MPFLINk CONSTRUCTION(factored fm KK est for 200 Ft at 30K) 1 $ 30,000 TOTAL $ 30,000 CONTRACT LABOR TOTAL $ 58,201 j OTHER COSTS j DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE UNIT COST I FLOWABLE FILL,SELECT FILL AND COMPACTION 1 $ 10,000 EA $ 101000 + OTHER COSTS $ 10,000 I DESCRIPTION COST BENEFITS OVERHEADS(48.99%OF COMPANY LABOR) $ 2,489 STORES OVERHEADS(4,0%OF MATERIALS W/STORES) $ 18 DIRECT OVERHEADS TOTAL $ 2,507 i TOTAL DIRECT COSTSFS 76,247 i 1 INDIRECT COSTS DESCRIPTION COST j RHUTTs(27.76%OF COMPANY LABOR+2.42%OF CONTRACTOR LABOR) $ 2,820 AFUDC DEBT(0.0000-A OF DIRECT AND INDIRECTTOTALS EXCLUDING AFUDC) $ - i Page 1 of 2 i i TRV at Rupert-Shamrock Rd w/2"steel gas main PROJECT COST ESTIMATE John Crane ; 080.49687 11/10/2015 DIVISION OVERHEADS(17.21%OF DIRECT COSTS) $ 13,122 CORPORATE OVERHEADS(9.28%OF DIRECT COSTS) $ 7,076 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $ 23,018 i i TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTSI$ 99,264.78 I I I ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST(CAPITALIZED) $ 99,264.78 INTREST CARRYING CHARGE $ 21,877.96 4 FRANCHISE FREE(5.0%) $ 6,057.14 TOTAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT(CAPITALIZED AND NON-CAPITALIZED) $ 177,199.88 I NOTES: 1 CONSTRICTION ESTIMATE PRIOR TO ACTUALCONSTRUCDON BIDS;COSTS BASED ON RECENT ATMOS ENERGY JOBS WITH SIMILAR SCOPES OF WORK. 2 ONE SEMERALOONTRACfOR FROM INCEPTION TO COMPIERON AND PRICES CONTINGENT ON AVARABIUIY OF CONTRACTOR AT TIME OF AWARD S ESIIUTATE DOES NOT NICUIOE COSTS FOR HOLDING BCHEOULE IN EXTREME WEATHER CONDI I IONS ? 4 CONSTRICTION ESTMMTE DOES NOT RICUIDE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WON PERMITTING I S CORPORATE OVERHEAD RATE VARIES AT TIME OF ITEM COST. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS ME BASED ON PREVIOUS ATMOS ENERGY JOB WITH S1MMR SCOPE OF LVORK 7 SOURCE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTIS ATMOS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE IOR PIPELINE RELOCATIONS 9 SJRVEY COSTS BASED ON PREVIOUS ATMOS ENERGY JOB WITH 3"LAR SCOPE OF WORK 3 10 TRV PROIECr IS SOX REIMBURSABLE j 11 INSPECTION PROVIDED BY 3RD PARTY I: 1 12 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROVIDED BY ATMOS ENERGY I t 4 s � ( i 1 t t 1 i I i i 1 1 r 3 1 I 1 t I , ) 1 ( y t 7 1 I � 1 t 1 I x i t i Page 2 of 2 1 3 I f r r ! i� I i Interest Carrying Costs & Franchise Fee Adjustment Calculator Project MI 0.49697 City List Updated: 6117/1015 I Project Titje:TRV Rupert Ph IV CIty:J Fort Worth ! CustomerType:1 Commercial j ACE Total Cost: $ 99 323.00 I Project Cost $ 99,323.00 Income Tax Adjustmontl S 21 890.79 I Franchise Fee Adjustmentl $ 6,060.69 TOTAL CHARGE1 S 127 274.48 :...............».....»......................,.»...........................»..»......................»...........»................... »».,........._....»_».,..,»..._....., i »............»..»...........................................................................127274.48»x 0.. 63 ti37,.... .............».......»_......»».»....-,.,_............ ..»........ ».......... j «....,..,........ ...»........,...«..«......,....«........,...«...,..........................................»............r........,....,.., .,................................_...........»........................................ � »».............._...........................................................................................................................»...... .............................»..._.....»._»»_». ....».....................»......._.... F »...............»..,........... .»..»..»...»..»................».............................»......»...........................................................................................................................................»..».... I »...._..»»»...»..».»....................»..................»..............................»............................................_»..».........»..............................»...........»......».....,..,................................... i Income Tax Adjustment- 22.040% ! Franchise Fee Adjustment=> 5.0% i i i i i I t r I i 2015 CIAO Gas&Pipeline Tax&Franchise Fee Tool v2.90_08049687.xis 11116/2015 12:03 PM j Exhibit E I �HII3IT"3 Adjustments Necessary to Accominbdi telhe Prbject a —Houston St R8location and Re 'oval fo)•iteee a'� A M .`Ot'tUer Phase V H m . ... � tY �I g3'' � facilities in the Wchlity 13 i .1 will Id o z _. r z - OF am •s., r�uj• ,: � � {ux�� �\. it i', IN nnW LU it w Q W Z l� Z V O Wioltuntokscnorlm9�-onavr3Mwl�.tr++a MN�tYMurw.4iNur4vKT�o N1mNM' �?i+�irwq. oci; ttnw vMr+u�nM Na vc/sr e +l y�a5 �g�• .���! ��991� r• ps 717171 $��a �� � � Ilk, S a 9 Hill �l MR 3 � � � Ae � © o oS e�•�o�a�®Up6.a�Mao.0em®U�oo?� Z' M jam Rol Iasg.; tall lit i E 8� it ti r 9 !i ' 3� "tee� M v • ygp�i1� ?" �1 01, G WIR 11111, 9' litg yy PA Bp All fib= R �. •; � i C �ge � a flag f. ygs fl B ss 8� e $ �p IM 1IGr�gga 8Rey . 9 bzIp � e <ig . < g8 8s �; Eg es scR lit 7 (' x 5 gall!" I yy R� PPP $� tiwi 41 ypg-.to p • �e 2rt� aR �` �' � R � RINI Y it y$ a ! S 7 a �� iy6 G 1bna < _� fig ✓ =b�- "� B-a xa @° j a @t k Ryit. a8y a z @_aye 8 8 1. » i $ SHE a ;y mi 8 �yy�a 8 fig „ a� 6 : p dgme € 85d �! @ � 8 fta b RBS y E' g°3 R o. if's 5 �- �P$8 �R a s 3g X �� q a d 14 � M 8 � b d'R1 8c i $ 5 81. � e$ a ro de : �y ni gill 01111 iR.1 e � n l 419 d d t t y b 3 9 y d is d d a 44[OM*ZM1-1i1r"MWean-aATAS +ovlHsw� ,suM�,hya.wMaso r�0.o�+w•4�aw,v=:..xruc uaRAHl,ww�aw n+xan V� �Q �I��s �- � � 111 � � � � • i6 S(fit}l q all. + '1@HIYN w . - • � .� �y11l1 —1-- .91 Ar,;.t •17tRFRilMaaiNaalilM1.!-af.Ml7W alJO.sM«11it4.y[YM�va•,{K111aiVfnAlye.yM IM�IP,1!°oANLL�•�iY'ItINVA TNIGWY IIIAPf ne n4•N 1 VJ?9lfi'�~ Hst:a7A� W.1a1!!s/Jlu>11{yw�sM111��.vMi`)6�fiewyaa'3p�•Sosrya4 p.rl7o�,1�s4aW ry�yiia�1u11 gIVANa.VGllligWfroalrulYNlln . 1 til _._� 1 ../.• .+r 1 ! r } l� a i• Rim Raw n:. r��•' :'?�.:".• r. '� .y �/opt -� ----..—'� l { •.rte :.�;;N / , -- __ � i yyI ter• . . . . :� IJ •r��� � 1 rye s I 1 . 1 • _ '• at / 4 g I i � i i - , I 1 1'i ti JAI i I .1 t 1 11 f p' } MATCH LINE-SEE SHEET UEG=00D,385pQ-21820-1305 G .. i J�Ay 1111, a- s p WIN AOV -Ell IT 1_L__j -77.7 Zr 16 .......... a 4WN is IN It. f6 wv BE .. oull poI �firl�-"f, •7 `Tri � � . v go m l C 1-W.: � I:1 •.y, 1-. ffo� Y 1 I C --r '•�''• ��tt -• 7- fi: � •�� .a.-.. �� � $� :�.,-1x•--� .r Iron ��•�' [• i�T. 12 j J f ELT IT, xg r iy-��a � I y zw� Eb .-•j- N.h dd!! _L i'Frei r ham: i ` • i i 1 1. .; _� - -r-j- _.i...�. :I �! LH- 41- jpt 8 Cy] ' ..;.. - t 71 e r �rj L INK INJ PT -all lit L HIM • J s�♦ ,SS H L --- --------- - - - - _ - n -{ '-{- - .J. . .-r. 7-1 - .1.:I -- + t q., j y - - I H t �M's+nvntxmxaezYamMl-e�rsnlarnxrmro/.....,suefYsw�•hLseev4•ollv�vei wrr.,.ry,..ci w•Inur.�cwwm:ue wYrn:> ��I�rw 1 Qee41 F --- — - - j.. . MI y@ppy@ 1dyRr•{ ••� Hyl � � r ,off � [FLq; • i gi••r„ � r�N' ♦ 1 'lir h If IV fit, d U T -rl N by H Ti:" I-1- ��- i T -37 • It II R L tH4.1 :z: -f- HI I1- 'j .t.{ ,t i_I-- if!.T t Iis IUD RNt 4OPPIR41 W. ♦ d _ �_ J. .__..t x't p3 lasso - a 111 TI K. L. 1 51 01 ♦ ♦ ! t - y4- a IE ♦ �FlN34il3Y0i/CAIPfiIKH-O.Vv93Y3 WSltl�tlM^MWf.•a%�+O�gw�ffSYy+ra Gy+•yIy WIW.>•+MYwS�•IIAVl g4Wt11tYA1 tN[OtfT ��Qq [AN.lralelRl I(' f EXIt1131T 4 { Form ofAdjusimenl Schedule FWCC Project Houston Street Location: i F Project Limits West of Main St.at Refinery St. From: West 70'Street To: Estimated Costs: $564,996.00 50% Eligible Reimbursement per TRV MUA:$277,498.00 Note:Plans, Specifications and Estimate must be attached to support the Estimated Costs. The suppoffing documentation must show items,quantifles,wilts and unit costs. The purpose of this form is to Inform the City of the anticipated dates by which Utility's facilities that are ! In conflict with the above project limits will be adjusted. The dates below assume that the City has acquired all necessary right-of-way for the project,that sufficient plans Indicating the proposed Improvements have been submitted to Utility,and that design changes necessitating material utility facility redesign do not occur. Utility Company: Phase I Atmos Energy Corporation Anticipated Construction Start Date: August 1,2016 Anticipated Duration of Construction: 10 Anticipated Construction Completion August 12,2016 Date: Utility Company:Phase 11 Atmos Energy Corporation Anticipated Construction Start Date: August 15,2016 Anticipated Duration of Construction: 16 Anticipated Construction Completion September 2,2016 Date: The information provided above is strictly an estbnate and is provided to City solely for City's planning purposes. This form is not intended to create any legally binding commitments ou either Utility or City,nor to tvalvo any rights Utility or City might otherwise possess. If there is a conflict between prior submitted dates and those shown In this form,the dates set forth above Should be used for City's planning purposes. Authorized Utility Representative: Date Jeffrey S.Knights Vice President,Technical Services Atmos Energy Corporation Duly AuthorIT d Representative Cfty of�f.Wotth Date a ' EDITS See Attached Exhibit 5--Cost Estimate • M f r • j. 9 I EXHIBIT 5 ATMOS ENERGY/TRV RELOCATION AGREEMENT PROJCT COST ESTIMATE TARRANT CO,TEXAS 80.39500 MATERIALS TOTAL ESTIAMTED MATERIAL COST $7,422 ATMOS COMPANY LABOR TOTAL ESTIAMTED COMPANY LABOR COST $14,973 RIGHT OF WAY TOTAL ESTIMATED ROW COST $0 CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $164,999 CONTRACTOR EXSPENSE TOTAL ESTIMATED CONTRACTOR EXSPENSE $144,9SS MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL ESTIMATED MISCELLANEOUS COST $0 i7OTAL DIRECTCOSE $332,349 ATMOS OVERHEADS TOTAL ESTIMATED OVERHEADS $100,760 9THER INCOME TAX ADJUSTMENT $95,457 CITY FRANCHISE FEE $26,428 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $554,994 Estimated reimburseable amunt Is:$277,498 NOTES: 1 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE PRIOR TO ACTUALCONSTRUCTION BIDS,COSTS BASED ON RECENT ATMOS ENERGY JOBS WITH SIMILAR SCOPES OF WORK. 2 ONE GENERAL CONTRACTOR FROM INCEPTION TO COMPLETION AND PRICES CONTINGENT ON AVAILABILITY OF CONTRACTOR AT TIME OF AWARD 3 ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE COSTS FOR HOLDING SCHEDULE IN EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS 4 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SWPPP PERMITTING S ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS ARE BASED ON PREVIOUS ATMOS ENERGY JOB WITH SIMILAR SCOPE OF WORK 6 SOURCE OF CONSTRUCTION COST IS ATMOS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 7 CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE FOR PIPELINE&REGULATOR STATION 8 SURVEY COSTS BASED ON PREVIOUS ATMOS ENERGYJOR WITH SIMILAR SCOPE OF WORK 9 NOT PROVIDED BY3RD PARTY 10 INSPECTION PROVIDED BY 3RD PARTY 11 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROVIDED BY ATMOS ENERGY i i I I 1 c TRV Main St Houston EXHIBIT 5 JOHN CRANE 80.395 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE 6/22/2016,Rev 11/04/2016 MATERIALS WITH STORES(ITEMS ORDERED THROUGH MCIUNICIN OR ON ATMOS POs) DESCRIPTION SIZE QTY PRICE UNIT COST PIPE POLY 2 PE 3408 SDR11 2 160 $ 0.90 FT $ 144.00 STOPPLE 12 CS ANSI 150 TDW CW/BOLTS,GASKET AND 12 1 $ 4,000.00 EA $ 4,000.00 FLANGE2 HV TEE.TAP CS ANSI 150 TDW W/CAP 2 2 $ 450.00 EA $ 900.00 TOR 2 CS ANSI 600 TDW W/PLUG AND CAP 2 2 $ 250.00 EA $ 500.00 RISER 1 1 1 $ 75;00 EA $ 75.00 AMI GAS METER,1000 1 1 $ 150.00 EA $ 150.00 CAP WILD 12 X.376W STD CS WPB 12 1 $ 175.00 EA $ 175.00 VALVE BF 2 PE 3400 2 1 $ 150.00 EA $ 150.00 TEE BF 2 PE 3408 2 1 $ 35.00 EA $ 35.00 CAP BF 2 PE 3408 2 2 $ 20.00 EA $ 40.00 ELL BF 90 DEG PE 3400 2 1 $ 30.00 EA $ 30.00 REDUCER BF 2 X 1-114 PE 3408 2 1 $ 25.00 EA $ 25.00 COUPLING EF 2 PE 3400 2 2 $ 90.00 EA $ 180.00 MISC.PIPING MATERIALS(PIPE,VALVES,FITTINGS,GASKETS,DOLTS,ETC.) 1 5% $ 297.20 $ - MATERIALS WITH STORES SUBTOTALl$ 6,701 TAX(8.25%) $ 553 FREIGHT(2.5%) $ 168 MATERIALS WITH STORES TOTAL $ 7,422 i. CONTRACTOR MATERIALS(MATERIALS-WITHOUT STORES-ITEMS PURCHASED BY CONTRACTORS) MISC 0 $ - EA . $ CONTRACTOR MATERIALS SUBTOTAL $ - TAX(8.25%) - CONTRACTOR MATERIALS TOTAL $$ - t LAND COSTS STATION SITE 0 $ - EA $ - I LAND COSTS TOTAL $ LAND RIGHTS ti DAMAGES AND RESTORATION 0 $ - EA $ - • a LAND RIGHTS TOTAL $ - y r COMPANY LABOR(TOTAL DIRECT CAPITAL LABOR) DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE UNIT COST ENGINEERING 40 $ 65 HR $ 2,600 FIELD OPERATIONS 20 $ 50 HR $ 1,000 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 20 $ 70 HR $ 1,400 ENVIRONMENTAL 20 $ 35 HR $ 700 RIGHTOF WAYAGENT 10 $ 35 HR $ 350 FIELD CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR(FCC) 80 $ 50 HR $ 4,000 Y MEASUREMENT GROUP-METER CHECK-OUT 0 $ 70 HR $ - { i 1 COMPANY LABOR TOTAL $ 10,050 CONTRACT LABOR i DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE UNIT COST '• CONTRACT ENGINEERING $ - SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER 45 $ 133.50 HR $ 6,008 PROJECT MANAGER 100 $ 130.60 HR $ 13,050 ENGINEER 70 $ 111.50 HR $ 7,805 SENIOR CAD DESIGNER 140 $ 107.60 HR $ 15,050 Page 1 of 2 TRV Maln St Houston EXHIBIT 5 JOHN CRANE 80.395 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE 6/22/2016,Rev 11/04/2016 PROJECT CONTROL SPECIALIST 4 $ 110.50 HR $ 442 CLERICAL 20 $ 67.50 HR $ 1,350 ROW AGENT(3RD PARTY) 65 $ 100.00 HR $ 6,500 CONTRACT INSPECTOR 60 $ 550 DAY $ 33;000 ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION 30 $ 220 DAY $ 6,600 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(3RD PARTY) 10 $ 75 HR $ 750 SURVEY CREW 2 $ 1,750 DAY $ 3,500 ROADWAY REPAIR+FLOWABLE FILL: 24,000 SF•2,08-50,000 1 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 PIPELINE RETIREMENT/ABANDONMENT:2230 LF+11.21=25,000 1 $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 25,000 PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION:2230 LF"17.94=40,000 1 $ 40,000 TOTAL $ 40,000 PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION REMOVAL:2230 LF'44.84=100,000 1 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 CROSS DORE INSPECTION 150 $ 6.00 FT $ 900 CONTRACT LABOR TOTAL $ 309,955 COST OF GAS LOST(I.E.FLARE GAS) $ - EA $ - OTHER $ - EA $ - OTHER COSTS $ - DIRECT COST OVERHEADS DESCRIPTION COST BENEFITS OVERHEADS(40.99%OF COMPANY LABOR) $ 4,923 DIRECT OVERHEADS TOTAL $ 4,923 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS1 332,350 INDIRECT COSTS DESCRIPTION COST RHUTTs(27.78%OF COMPANY LABOR+2.42%OF CONTRACTOR LABOR) $ 10,293 AFUDC DEBT(0,5638%OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT TOTALS EXCLUDING AFUDC) $ 2,428 DIVISION OVERHEADS(17.21%OF DIRECT COSTS) $ 57,197 ' CORPORATE OVERHEADS(9.28Y.OF DIRECT COSTS) $ 30,842 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $ 100,760 TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS1$ 433,120 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST(CAPITALIZED) $ 433,110 INTEREST CARRYING CHARGE 122.04%OF NON-CAPITALIZED) $ 95,457 I P FRANCHISE FEE(5.0%) $ 26,428,37 TOTAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT(CAPITALIZED AND NON-CAPITALIZED) $ 554,996 Project Is 50%.reirnbuseable by Cily of FOtt Word). Estimated reirnburseable alnunt Is:$277,498 NOTES: I CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE PRIOR TO ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION DIOS,COSTS BASED ON RECENTATMOS ENERGY JOBS WITH SIMILAR SCOPES OF WORK. 2 ONE GENERAL CONTRACTOR FROM INCEPTION TO COMPLETION ANO PRICES CONTINGENT ON AVAILABILITY OF CONTRACTOR ATTIME OF AWARD 3 ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE COSTS FOR HOLDING SCHEDULE W EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS 4 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE COSTSASS000ITED WRN SWPP►PERMITTING S ENVIROMMERYAL COSTS AN OASED ON PREMOUS ATMOS ENEMY JOR WITH SIMILAR SCOPE OF WORK G SOURCE OF CONSTRUCTION COST IS ATMOS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 7 CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARC FOR PIPELINE&REGULATOR STATION D SURVEY COSTS BASED ON PREVIOUS ATMOS ENERGY JOB WITH SIMILAR SCOPE OF WORK h 9 NOT PROVIDED DY 3110 PARTY 10 INSPECTION PROVIDED BY3RO PARTY r i it CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROVIDED BY ATMOS ENERGY I i. Page 2 of 2 r