HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 39644ITY
CON RACTENO �]q� �_q..
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED DESIGN SERVICES
This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a home -rule municipal
corporation situated in Tarrant, Denton, Parker and Wise Counties, Texas (the "CITY"), and
Freese and Nichols, Inc., (the "ENGINEER"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Trinity
River Vision Central City — Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge — City Project No. 00144.
Article I
Scope of Services
A. The Scope of Services is set forth in Attachment A.
Article II
Compensation
A. The ENGINEER's compensation is set forth in Attachment B.
Article III
Terms of Payment
Payments to the ENGINEER will be made as follows:
A. Invoice and Payment
(1) The Engineer shall provide the City sufficient documentation, including but not
limited to meeting the requirements set forth in Attachment D to this
AGREEMENT, to reasonably substantiate the invoices.
(2) The ENGINEER will issue monthly invoices for all work performed under this
AGREEMENT. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days of receipt.
(3) Upon completion of services enumerated in Article I, the final payment of any
balance will be due within 30 days of receipt of the final invoice.
(4) In the event of a disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested
will be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. The
CITY will exercise reasonableness in contesting any bill or portion thereof. No
interest will accrue on any contested portion of the billing until mutually
resolved.
(5) If the CITY fails to make payment in full to ENGINEER for billings contested in
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 1 of 15 OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY :SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TX
good faith within 60 days of the amount due, the ENGINEER may, after giving
7 days' written notice to CITY, suspend services under this AGREEMENT until
paid in full. In the event of suspension of services, the ENGINEER shall have
no liability to CITY for delays or damages caused the CITY because of such
suspension of services.
Article IV
Obligations of the Engineer
Amendments to Article IV, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. General
The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering
representative under this Agreement, providing professional engineering
consultation and advice and furnishing customary services incidental thereto.
B. Standard of Care
The standard of care applicable to the ENGINEER's services will be the
degree of skill and diligence normally employed in the State of Texas by
professional engineers or consultants performing the same or similar services
at the time such services are performed.
C. Subsurface Investigations
(1) The ENGINEER shall advise the CITY with regard to the necessity for
subcontract work such as special surveys, tests, test borings, or other
subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering
work to be performed hereunder. The ENGINEER shall also advise the
CITY concerning the results of same. Such surveys, tests, and
investigations shall be furnished by the CITY, unless otherwise specified
in Attachment A.
(2) In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations,
the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test
points and sample intervals and at locations other than where
observations, exploration, and investigations have been made. Because
of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or
unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect the
total PROJECT cost and/or execution. These conditions and
cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of the ENGINEER.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 2 of 15
D. Preparation of Engineering Drawings
The ENGINEER will provide to the CITY the original drawings of all plans in ink
on reproducible mylar sheets and electronic files in .pdf format, or as otherwise
approved by CITY, which shall become the property of the CITY. CITY may
use such drawings in any manner it desires; provided, however, that the
ENGINEER shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project
other than the PROJECT described herein.
E. Engineer's Personnel at Construction Site
(1) The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site,
whether as on-site representatives or otherwise, do not make the ENGINEER
or its personnel in any way responsible for those duties that belong to the
CITY and/or the CITY's construction contractors or other entities, and do not
relieve the construction contractors or any other entity of their obligations,
duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all construction
methods, means, techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for
coordinating and completing all portions of the construction work in
accordance with the Contract Documents and any health or safety precautions
required by such construction work. The ENGINEER and its personnel have
no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor or other
entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or safety
precautions.
(2) Except to the extent of specific site visits expressly detailed and set forth in
Attachment A, the ENGINEER or its personnel shall have no obligation or
responsibility to visit the construction site to become familiar with the progress
or quality of the completed work on the PROJECT or to determine, in general,
if the work on the PROJECT is being performed in a manner indicating that the
PROJECT, when completed, will be in accordance with the Contract
Documents, nor shall anything in the Contract Documents or the agreement
between CITY and ENGINEER be construed as requiring ENGINEER to make
exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to discover latent defects in the
work or otherwise check the quality or quantity of the work on the PROJECT.
If the ENGINEER makes on-site observation(s) of a deviation from the
Contract Documents, the ENGINEER shall inform the CITY.
(3) When professional certification of performance or characteristics of materials,
systems or equipment is reasonably required to perform the services set forth
in the Scope of Services, the ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely upon such
certification to establish materials, systems or equipment and performance
criteria to be required in the Contract Documents.
F. Opinions of Probable Cost, Financial Considerations, and Schedules
(1) The ENGINEER shall provide opinions of probable costs based on the
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 3 of 15
current available information at the time of preparation, in accordance
with Attachment A.
(2) In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility
projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER has no
control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent
conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or
maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market
conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type,
management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic
and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate PROJECT
cost or schedule. Therefore, the ENGINEER makes no warranty that the
CITY's actual PROJECT costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or
schedules will not vary from the ENGINEER's opinions, analyses,
projections, or estimates.
G. Construction Progress Payments
Recommendations by the ENGINEER to the CITY for periodic construction
progress payments to the construction contractor will be based on the
ENGINEER's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling and
observation that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such
recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations
have been made by the ENGINEER to ascertain that the construction
contractor has completed the work in exact accordance with the Contract
Documents; that the final work will be acceptable in all respects; that the
ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purpose
the construction contractor has used the moneys paid; that title to any of the
work, materials, or equipment has passed to the CITY free and clear of liens,
claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there are not other matters
at issue between the CITY and the construction contractor that affect the
amount that should be paid.
H. Record Drawings
Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of
information compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent
the exact location, type of various components, or exact manner in which the
PROJECT was finally constructed. The ENGINEER is not responsible for any
errors or omissions in the information from others that is incorporated into the
record drawings.
I. Minority and Woman Business Enterprise (M/WBE) Participation
In accord with City of Fort Worth Ordinance No. 15530, the City has goals for
the participation of minority business enterprises and woman business
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 4 of 15
enterprises in City contracts. Engineer acknowledges the MNVBE goal
established for this contract and its commitment to meet that goal. Any
misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent misrepresentation) and/or
the commission of fraud by the Engineer may result in the termination of this
agreement and debarment from participating in City contracts for a period of
time of not less than three (3) years.
J. Right to Audit
(1) ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall, until the expiration of five (5) years
after final payment under this contract, have access to and the right to
examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and
records of the ENGINEER involving transactions relating to this contract.
ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall have access during normal working
hours to all necessary ENGINEER facilities and shall be provided adequate
and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the
provisions of this section. The CITY shall give ENGINEER reasonable
advance notice of intended audits.
(2) ENGINEER further agrees to include in all its subconsultant agreements
hereunder a provision to the effect that the subconsultant agrees that the CITY
shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after final payment under the
subcontract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any
directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such
subconsultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that the
CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all subconsultant
facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space, in order
to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article together with
subsection (3) hereof. CITY shall give subconsultant reasonable advance
notice of intended audits.
(3) ENGINEER and subconsultant agree to photocopy such documents as may
be requested by the CITY. The CITY agrees to reimburse ENGINEER for the
cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect
as of the time copying is performed.
K. INSURANCE
(1) ENGINEER'S INSURANCE
a. Commercial General Liability — the ENGINEER shall maintain commercial
general liability (CGL) and, if necessary, commercial umbrella insurance
with a limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 per each occurrence with a
$2,000,000.00 aggregate. If such Commercial General Liability insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this
PROJECT or location.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 5 of 15
The CITY shall be included as an insured under the CGL, using ISO
additional insured endorsement or a substitute providing equivalent
coverage, and under the commercial umbrella, if any. This
insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to any other
insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the CITY. The
Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall have no
exclusions by endorsements that would alter or nullify:
premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual,
personal injury, or advertizing injury, which are normally contained
within the policy, unless the CITY approves such exclusions in
writing.
ii. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the commercial general
liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance maintained in
accordance with this agreement.
b. Business Auto — the ENGINEER shall maintain business auto liability and,
if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less
than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall cover liability arising
out of "any auto", including owned, hired, and non -owned autos, when said
vehicle is used in the course of the PROJECT. If the engineer owns no
vehicles, coverage for hired or non -owned is acceptable.
i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the business auto liability or
commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by ENGINEER
pursuant to this agreement or under any applicable auto physical
damage coverage.
c. Workers' Compensation —ENGINEER shall maintain workers
compensation and employers liability insurance and, if necessary,
commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less than
$100,000.00 each accident for bodily injury by accident or $100,000.00
each employee for bodily injury by disease, with $500,000.00 policy limit.
i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by workers compensation and
employee's liability or commercial umbrella insurance obtained by
ENGINEER pursuant to this agreement.
d. Professional Liability — the ENGINEER shall maintain professional liability,
a claims -made policy, with a minimum of $1,000,000.00 per claim and
aggregate. The policy shall contain a retroactive date prior to the date of
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 6 of 15
the contract or the first date of services to be performed, whichever is
earlier. Coverage shall be maintained for a period of 5 years following the
completion of the contract. An annual certificate of insurance specifically
referencing this project shall be submitted to the CITY for each year
following completion of the contract.
(2) GENERAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
a. Certificates of insurance evidencing that the ENGINEER has obtained all
required insurance shall be delivered to the CITY prior to ENGINEER
proceeding with the PROJECT.
b. Applicable policies shall be endorsed to name the CITY an Additional
Insured thereon, as its interests may appear. The term CITY shall include
its employees, officers, officials, agents, and volunteers as respects the
contracted services.
c. Certificate(s) of insurance shall document that insurance coverage
specified in this agreement are provided under applicable policies
documented thereon.
d. Any failure on part of the CITY to request required insurance
documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements.
e. A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material change in
coverage shall be provided to the CITY. A ten (10) days notice shall be
acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. Such terms shall be
endorsed onto ENGINEER's insurance policies. Notice shall be sent to the
respective Department Director (by name), City of Fort Worth, 1000
Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
Insurers for all policies must be authorized to do business in the State of
Texas and have a minimum rating of A:V or greater, in the current A.M.
Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength
and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management.
g. Any deductible or self insured retention in excess of $25,000.00 that would
change or alter the requirements herein is subject to approval by the CITY
in writing, if coverage is not provided on a first -dollar basis. The CITY, at it
sole discretion, may consent to alternative coverage maintained through
insurance pools or risk retention groups. Dedicated financial resources or
letters of credit may also be acceptable to the CITY.
h. Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in
favor of the CITY as respects the PROJECT.
i. The CITY shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring expense,
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 7 of 15
to review the ENGINEER's insurance policies including endorsements
thereto and, at the CITY's discretion; the ENGINEER may be required to
provide proof of insurance premium payments.
j. Lines of coverage, other than Professional Liability, underwritten on a
claims -made basis, shall contain a retroactive date coincident with or prior
to the date of the contractual agreement. The certificate of insurance shall
state both the retroactive date and that the coverage is claims -made.
k. Coverages, whether written on an occurrence or claims -made basis, shall
be maintained without interruption nor restrictive modification or changes
from date of commencement of the PROJECT until final payment and
termination of any coverage required to be maintained after final payments.
I. The CITY shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any insurance
premiums required by this agreement.
m. Sub consultants and subcontractors to/of the ENGINEER shall be required
by the ENGINEER to maintain the same or reasonably equivalent
insurance coverage as required for the ENGINEER. When sub
consultants/subcontractors maintain insurance coverage, ENGINEER shall
provide CITY with documentation thereof on a certificate of insurance.
L. Independent Consultant
The ENGINEER agrees to perform all services as an independent consultant
and not as a subcontractor, agent, or employee of the CITY.
M. Disclosure
The ENGINEER acknowledges to the CITY that it has made full disclosure in
writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest,
including personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in property abutting the
proposed PROJECT and business relationships with abutting property cities.
The ENGINEER further acknowledges that it will make disclosure in writing of
any conflicts of interest that develop subsequent to the signing of this contract
and prior to final payment under the contract.
N. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances
(1) If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or
suspected, the ENGINEER will stop its own work in the affected portions of
the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation.
(2) If asbestos or other hazardous substances are suspected, the CITY may
request the ENGINEER to assist in obtaining the services of a qualified
subcontractor to manage the remediation activities of the PROJECT.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 8 of 15
O. Permitting Authorities - Design Changes
If permitting authorities require design changes so as to comply with published
design criteria and/or current engineering practice standards which the
ENGINEER should have been aware of at the time this Agreement was
executed, the ENGINEER shall revise plans and specifications, as required, at
its own cost and expense. However, if design changes are required due to the
changes in the permitting authorities' published design criteria and/or practice
standards criteria which are published after the date of this Agreement which
the ENGINEER could not have been reasonably aware of, the ENGINEER
shall notify the CITY of such changes and an adjustment in compensation will
be made through an amendment to this AGREEMENT.
P. Schedule
ENGINEER shall manage the PROJECT in accordance with the schedule
developed per Attachment D to this AGREEMENT.
Article V
Obligations of the City
Amendments to Article V, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. City -Furnished Data
ENGINEER may rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the
information provided by the CITY.
B. Access to Facilities and Property
The CITY will make its facilities accessible to the ENGINEER as required for
the ENGINEER's performance of its services. The CITY will perform, at no
cost to the ENGINEER, such tests of equipment, machinery, pipelines, and
other components of the CITY's facilities as may be required in connection
with the ENGINEER's services. The CITY will be responsible for all acts of the
CITY's personnel.
C. Advertisements, Permits, and Access
Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, the CITY will obtain,
arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses required
by local, state, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights-of-way, and
access necessary for the ENGINEER's services or PROJECT construction.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 9 of 15
D. Timely Review
The CITY will examine the ENGINEER's studies, reports, sketches, drawings,
specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of an attorney,
insurance counselor, accountant, auditor, bond and financial advisors, and
other consultants as the CITY deems appropriate; and render in writing
decisions required by the CITY in a timely manner in accordance with the
project schedule prepared in accordance with Attachment D.
E. Prompt Notice
The CITY will give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever CITY
observes or becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or
timing of the ENGINEER's services or of any defect in the work of the
ENGINEER or construction contractors.
F. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances Release.
(1) CITY acknowledges ENGINEER will perform part of the work at CITY's
facilities that may contain hazardous materials, including asbestos
containing materials, or conditions, and that ENGINEER had no prior role
in the generation, treatment, storage, or disposition of such materials. In
consideration of the associated risks that may give rise to claims by third
parties or employees of City, City hereby releases ENGINEER from any
damage or liability related to the presence of such materials.
(2) The release required above shall not apply in the event the discharge,
release or escape of hazardous substances, contaminants, or asbestos is
a result of ENGINEER's negligence or if ENGINEER brings such
hazardous substance, contaminant or asbestos onto the project.
G. Contractor Indemnification and Claims
The CITY agrees to include in all construction contracts the provisions of
Article IV.E. regarding the ENGINEER's Personnel at Construction Site, and
provisions providing contractor indemnification of the CITY and the
ENGINEER for contractor's negligence.
H. Contractor Claims and Third -Party Beneficiaries
(1) The CITY agrees to include the following clause in all contracts with
construction contractors and equipment or materials suppliers:
"Contractors, subcontractors and equipment and materials
suppliers on the PROJECT, or their sureties, shall maintain no
direct action against the ENGINEER, its officers, employees,
and subcontractors, for any claim arising out of, in connection
City of Fort Worth. Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 10 of 15
with, or resulting from the engineering services performed.
Only the CITY will be the beneficiary of any undertaking by
the ENGINEER."
(2) This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the CITY
and the ENGINEER and there are no third -party beneficiaries.
(3) The CITY will include in each agreement it enters into with any other entity or
person regarding the PROJECT a provision that such entity or person shall
have no third -party beneficiary rights under this Agreement.
(4) Nothing contained in this section V.H. shall be construed as a waiver of any
right the CITY has to bring a claim against ENGINEER.
CITY's Insurance
(1) The CITY may maintain property insurance on certain pre-existing structures
associated with the PROJECT.
(2) The CITY will ensure that Builders Risk/installation insurance is maintained at
the replacement cost value of the PROJECT. The CITY may provide
ENGINEER a copy of the policy or documentation of such on a certificate of
insurance.
(3) The CITY will specify that the Builders Risk/Installation insurance shall be
comprehensive in coverage appropriate to the PROJECT risks.
J. Litigation Assistance
The Scope of Services does not include costs of the ENGINEER for required
or requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or
assist in litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. In the event CITY
requests such services of the ENGINEER, this AGREEMENT shall be
amended or a separate agreement will be negotiated between the parties.
K. Changes
The CITY may make or approve changes within the general Scope of Services
in this AGREEMENT. If such changes affect the ENGINEER's cost of or time
required for performance of the services, an equitable adjustment will be made
through an amendment to this AGREEMENT with appropriate CITY approval.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 11 of 15
Article VI
General Legal Provisions
Amendments to Article VI, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. Authorization to Proceed
ENGINEER shall be authorized to proceed with this AGREEMENT upon
receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the CITY.
B. Reuse of Project Documents
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products of
the ENGINEER, whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments of
service for this PROJECT, whether the PROJECT is completed or not.
Reuse, change, or alteration by the CITY or by others acting through or on
behalf of the CITY of any such instruments of service without the written
permission of the ENGINEER will be at the CITY's sole risk. The CITY shall
own the final designs, drawings, specifications and documents.
C. Force Majeure
The ENGINEER is not responsible for damages or delay in performance
caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the
control of the ENGINEER that prevent ENGINEER's performance of its
obligations hereunder.
D. Termination
(1) This AGREEMENT may be terminated only by the City for convenience on
30 days' written notice. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either the
CITY or the ENGINEER for cause if either party fails substantially to perform
through no fault of the other and does not commence correction of such
nonperformance with in 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the
correction thereafter.
(2) If this AGREEMENT is terminated for the convenience of the City, the
ENGINEER will be paid for termination expenses as follows:
a.) Cost of reproduction of partial or complete studies, plans, specifications
or other forms of ENGINEER'S work product;
b.) Out-of-pocket expenses for purchasing electronic data files and other
data storage supplies or services;
c.) The time requirements for the ENGINEER'S personnel to document the
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 12 of 15
work underway at the time of the CITY'S termination for convenience so
that the work effort is suitable for long time storage.
(3) Prior to proceeding with termination services, the ENGINEER will submit to the
CITY an itemized statement of all termination expenses. The CITY'S approval
will be obtained in writing prior to proceeding with termination services.
E. Suspension, Delay, or Interruption to Work
The CITY may suspend, delay, or interrupt the services of the ENGINEER for
the convenience of the CITY. In the event of such suspension, delay, or
interruption, an equitable adjustment in the ' PROJECT's schedule,
commitment and cost of the ENGINEER's personnel and subcontractors, and
ENGINEER's compensation will be made.
F. Indemnification
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the
ENGINEER shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the CITY against
liability for any damage caused by or resulting from an act of negligence,
intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure to pay a
subcontractor or supplier committed by the ENGINEER or ENGINEER's
agent, consultant under contract, or another entity over which the ENGINEER
exercises control.
G. Assignment
Neither party shall assign all or any part of this AGREEMENT without the prior
written consent of the other party.
H. Interpretation
Limitations on liability and indemnities in this AGREEMENT are business
understandings between the parties and shall apply to all the different theories
of recovery, including breach of contract or warranty, tort including negligence,
strict or statutory liability, or any other cause of action, except for willful
misconduct or gross negligence for limitations of liability and sole negligence
for indemnification. Parties mean the CITY and the ENGINEER, and their
officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors.
I. Jurisdiction
The law of the State of Texas shall govern the validity of this AGREEMENT, its
interpretation and performance, and any other claims related to it. The venue
for any litigation related to this AGREEMENT shall be Tarrant County, Texas.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 13 of 15
J. Severability and Survival
If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any reason
to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality,
or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this AGREEMENT
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had
never been contained herein. Articles V.F., VI.B., VI.D., VI.F., VI.H., and VI.I.
shall survive termination of this AGREEMENT for any cause.
K. Observe and Comply
ENGINEER shall at all times observe and comply with all federal and State
laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any
way affect this AGREEMENT and the work hereunder, and shall observe and
comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which may exist or
may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for
such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be
considered. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY
and all of its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims or
liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law, ordinance, or
regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 14 of 15
Article VII
Attachments, Schedules, and Signatures
This AGREEMENT, including its attachments and schedules, constitutes the entire
AGREEMENT, supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, and may only be
changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. The following attachments and
schedules are hereby made a part of this AGREEMENT:
Attachment A - Scope of Services
Attachment B - Compensation
Attachment C - Amendments to Standard Agreement for Engineering Services
Attachment D - Project Schedule
Attachment E - Location Map
r -
Executed this thoy-1 day of � , 2009.
ATTEST:
Marty HendAx cl�i�
City Secretary Pah;
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND L
411""�'
Amy Ramsey
Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
ENOM&#,-, 'iWQ)UIRED
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 15 of 15
CITY OF FORT
a��ci jai uv vvJlA
o gkssistant City Manager
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
William A. Verkest, P. .
Director, Transportation and Public Works
Department
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
Robert F. Pence, P.E., BCEE
President and CEO
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
WORTH, TX
CHECKLIST OF ATTACHMENTS AND EXHIBITS
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
The Standard Engineering Contract document and Attachment A (General Scope of Services) shall
be provided by the City.
Document
Check if included
Checklist
This sheet
Contract
Standard Engineering Contract Document
(Provided by City)
Attachment A
General Scope of Services
(Provided by City)
(Supplements to Attachment A)
Exhibit A-2
Design Services: Paving and/or Drainage Improvements
Exhibit A-3
Henderson Street Schematic Plan
Exhibit A-4
North Main Street Schematic Plan
Exhibit A-5
White Settlement Street Schematic Plan
Attachment B
Compensation and Payment Schedule
(Supplements to Attachment B)
Exhibit B-1
Method of Payment
Exhibit B-2
Labor Multiplier Schedules
Exhibit B -3A
Summary of Fees by Basic and Extra Services
Exhibit B-313
Summary of Fees by Team Members
Exhibit B-4
Design Phase Fee Breakdown
Exhibit B-5
Construction Phase Fee Breakdown
Attachment C
Not Used
Attachment D
Project Schedule
Attachment E
Location Map
ATTACHMENT "A"
Scope for Engineering Design Related Services for Street Improvements
The scope set forth herein defines the work to be performed by the ENGINEER in
completing the project. Both the CITY and ENGINEER have attempted to clearly define the
work to be performed and address the needs of the Project. The scope is completely
described in Exhibit "A-2".
ATTACHMENT W TO STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED DESIGN SERVICES (REV 10-29-09)
PAGE 1 OF 1
EXHIBIT "A-2"
SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
(SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT "A")
DESIGN SERVICES: PAVING AND/OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
The following is a clarification of the tasks that the ENGINEER will perform under ATTACHMENT
"A". Work under this attachment includes engineering services for paving and/or storm drain
improvements for the following:
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
General
The Trinity River Vision Central City (Trinity Uptown) project contains three bridges that will cross
the proposed bypass channel: North Main Street, Henderson Street, and White Settlement Road.
These three bridges have schematic designs already prepared by an earlier design contract with
another firm.
This project will have the following phases:
• Phase 1, the preliminary design and 30% design of Henderson Street bridge.
• Phase 2, final design of the Henderson Street bridge.
• Phase 3, final design of North Main Street bridge.
• Phase 4, 30% level design of the White Settlement Road bridge.
• Phase 5, construction phase for the Henderson Street bridge.
The type of bridge selected by the CITY during the Phase 1 significantly affects the remaining
Scope of Services. For this Scope of Services, we are assuming a bridge type that corresponds
with the CITY's current construction budget of $53,555,146 for the three bridges (including the
approaches, railroad bridges, lighting, etc., as well as escalation costs) broken down
approximately as follows:
• Henderson Street: $18,891,349
• North Main: $14,942,933
EA2-1
Rev 11/12/09
• White Settlement: $19,720,864
The bridge type assumed to be within this budget is as follows: 1) For the railroad bridge, a
conventional precast prestressed beam structure, but with some aesthetic enhancements to
match the channel bridge, costing approximately $70/sf; 2) For the channel bridge, an "enhanced"
bridge consisting of precast concrete spliced -girder beams and special aesthetic detailing costing
approximately $157/sf, or a similar bridge with an estimated construction cost at or below the
CITY's current construction budget. Spliced -girder beams consist of conventional precast
concrete beam shapes, slightly modified for greater depths where required, and splices between
beam segments with post -tensioning to achieve a continuous beam over the columns that are
capable of greater spans than conventional precast beam structures.
The following items are not a part of this scope of services:
1. If another bridge type is selected by the CITY during Phase 1, additional scope and fee
may be necessary. Bridge types that could possibly require additional scope and fee
include steel or concrete arch bridges, cable -stayed bridges, rigid frame bridges, precast
concrete segmental bridges, or suspension bridges.
2. Construction phase services for the North Main bridge.
3. Final design of the White Settlement bridge.
4. Design of channel slope protection, walkways along the channel, the channel itself, ground
protection under the bridge (such as articulating concrete blocks or concrete riprap), scour
analysis, temporary drainage from the excavation below the bridge, or other similar work
related to the channel.
5. Specialty electrical lighting beyond typical street lighting and area lighting for pedestrians
under the bridge.
Upon receipt of notice to proceed, the ENGINEER will perform the following tasks:
Phase 1: Preliminary Design and 30% Henderson St Design
The purpose of Phase 1, the preliminary design and 30% Henderson Street bridge design phase,
is to first develop a preliminary design (and opinion of probable construction cost) for the
Henderson Street bridge that would also be similar for the other two bridges, and then to develop
the Henderson Street design to a 30% level. The design team will evaluate multiple bridge types
for Henderson Street, and present the CITY with sketches, layouts, and opinions of costs for
various bridge design options.
EA2-2
Rev 11/12/09
A. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF HENDERSON STREET BRIDGE
1. The ENGINEER shall submit a project schedule after the design contract is fully
executed. The schedule shall be updated and submitted to the CITY along with
monthly progress reports as required under Attachment B of the contract.
2. Obtain existing data, including survey, geotechnical investigation reports,
drawings, and hydraulic data. Review all pertinent project data assembled. In
addition to data obtained from the City, ENGINEER will research and make
efforts to obtain pertinent information to aid in coordination of the proposed
improvements with any planned future improvements that may influence the
project. ENGINEER will also identify and seek to obtain data for existing
conditions that may impact the project including; utilities, City Master plans, CITY
drainage complaint files, existing applicable drainage studies and property
ownership as available from the Tax Assessor's office.
3. Conduct and document a project kick-off meeting with City core project team.
The ENGINEER shall attend preliminary conferences with authorized
representatives of the City regarding the scope of project so that the plans and
specifications which are to be developed hereunder by the ENGINEER will result
in providing facilities which are economical in design and conform to the City's
requirements and budgetary constraints.
4. Conduct up to four two-hour initial meetings over a maximum two-day time frame
with stakeholders designated by the CITY to gather input in order to develop
bridge options. Stakeholders may include the CITY, Trinity River Vision Authority
(TRVA), Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD), Streams and Valleys,
Inc.(S+V), TxDOT, Arts Council of Fort Worth, and other design consultants
associated with the Trinity River Vision. Meetings will be held individually or with
groups of stakeholders and minutes will be recorded. ENGINEER will schedule
and lead all meetings.
5. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 18 biweekly meetings
with the CITY and the TRVA during this phase.
EA2-3
Rev 11/12/09
6. Coordination with Other Agencies: During the preliminary evaluation phase the
ENGINEER shall coordinate with all utilities, including utilities owned by the City,
TxDOT and railroads. These entities shall also be contacted if applicable, to
determine plans for any proposed facilities or adjustment to existing facilities
within the project limits. The information obtained shall be shown on the
preliminary plans. The ENGINEER shall show the location of the proposed utility
lines, existing utility lines and any adjustments and/or relocation of the existing
lines within the project limits. ENGINEER shall complete all forms necessary for
City to obtain permit letters from TxDOT and railroads and submit such forms to
the City. City shall be responsible for forwarding the forms to the affected
agencies for execution.
7. Evaluate bridge aesthetics, roadway, and structural aspects affecting design.
Each of these aspects will be addressed in the development and illustration of
designs.
8. Determine other survey, geotechnical, and traffic data required.
9. Coordinate with the public artist to identify opportunities to incorporate public art
into the bridge design.
10. Environmental: Review the current Categorical Exclusion environmental
document, and meet with TxDOT to discuss and determine a scope of work, if
any, for completing the environmental review. It is our understanding that the
current environmental document is anticipated to be acceptable to TxDOT
without further modification, and that no additional environmental work is
anticipated as a part of this Scope of Services. Therefore, no other
environmental services are included in this Scope of Services.
11. Prepare multiple rough design options for the Henderson Street bridge based on
project goals, initial CITY and stakeholder input, and technical opportunities and
constraints. The design options will address the bridge spans, abutments, and
pertinent roadway approaches. The illustrations will include two-dimensional
sketches of bridge profiles and cross-sections, but not three-dimensional
renderings or animations. The design options will only be for "enhanced" bridges
EA2-4
Rev 11/12/09
costing approximately $157/sf, and will only be for Henderson Street bridge, with
the understanding that White Settlement and North Main bridges would be
similar.
12. ENGINEER shall prepare a study of bridge and retaining wall costs to evaluate
the most cost effective combination of embankment, retaining walls and bridges
on the project. This information shall be considered in finalizing bridge lengths,
although it is possible that factors other than cost may be used in establishing
final bridge lengths and retaining wall limits.
13. Landscape Architecture: No landscape architecture design will be included in
this phase with the exception of the development of the hardscape ramp
elements adjacent to the abutments. A cost allowance, based on the previous
landscape architecture costs already developed prior to this contract, will be
included in the cost estimate.
14. Hydraulic evaluation:
i. Complete a hydraulic analysis based on preliminary designs for each of
the three bridges (North Main Street, Henderson Street, and White
Settlement Road; three total bridge designs) to determine the hydraulic
impact of the bridges with water surface elevation and velocity results for
the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF flood events.
ii. Complete a hydraulic analysis of two additional modifications/refinements
for each bridge design for each of the three bridge locations (six total
additional modifications/refinements). Provide additional summaries of
hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities, and
valley storage impacts for the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF
events.
iii. Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses for the bridge design for each
of the three bridge locations to the USACE along with a written summary
of the hydraulic impacts at each of the three bridges. Attend a two-hour
meeting to brief USACE and discuss. Document the USACE's comments
related to the design upon receipt.
EA2-5
Rev 11/12/09
iv. Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
analyses, further modify the bridge design for each of the three locations.
v. Once bridge designs are finalized, complete final hydraulic analysis of
proposed bridges, including final technical memorandum documenting the
design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-,
100-, 500 -year and SPF events.
vi. Submit final HEC -RAS model with technical memorandum to USACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
vii. Within one week of receiving USACE comments described above,
address comments and provide final comment response.
15. Electrical: No electrical design will be included in this phase. A cost allowance,
based on the previous illumination costs already developed prior to this contract,
will be included in the cost estimate.
16. Geotechnical Investigation/Pavement Design: An existing geotechnical study
has already been prepared and will be provided to the ENGINEER by the CITY.
A supplemental study shall be prepared by the ENGINEER to include the
following:
i. The additional study will include engineering studies only. No additional
borings or geotechnical testing is included.
ii. Pavement design per TxDOT requirements for 700' to 800' pavement
lengths along Henderson on each side of proposed bridge plus 3 short
intersecting streets along these lengths.
iii. Pavement design per TxDOT requirements for 400' to 1,000' pavement
lengths along North Main on each side of proposed bridge plus 3 short
intersecting streets along these lengths.
iv. Active earth pressures behind pier supported abutment retaining walls
that are to be used as flood walls and subject to rapid draw down
conditions.
v. Groundwater hydrology studies based on elevated water levels within the
channel followed by rapid draw down within the channel.
EA2-6
Rev 11/12/09
vi. Recommendations for backfilling flood walls to allow for drainage behind
the flood walls.
vii. L -Pile analyses for piers supporting the MSE walls.
17. Prepare order -of -magnitude opinion of probable construction cost for each
design option. Costs shall cover all three bridges. Since only the Henderson
Street bridge will be preliminarily designed during this phase, the opinion of
probable construction costs will be based on the costs for Henderson Street, and
extrapolated to the other two bridges based on square foot costs with an
appropriate contingency factor.
18. Conduct and document up to three informal 2 -hour review meetings with CITY
core team at FNI offices to review the initial design concepts and probable costs.
At the conclusion of these meetings, one bridge option will be selected for
further refinement.
19. Further refine the single bridge option chosen by the CITY core team. Develop a
3D rendering of the bridge at Henderson Street only. Develop 2D elevation
sketches of the bridges at North Main and White Settlement. Prepare a
presentation of the chosen design for use at the Citizen Advisory Committee
stakeholder collaboration workshop.
20. Conduct and document a 2 -hour Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) stakeholder
collaboration workshop to briefly review the initial design concepts considered by
the CITY core team, and then present for comments the final bridge option
already selected, together with an opinion of the probable construction costs.
The goal of the workshop will be to provide information to the CAC and receive
minor comments on the design.
21. Coordinate open -house public meetings to be held over a two-week period,
primarily at lunchtime and evening hours (total of 12 two-hour meetings).
Specifically:
i. Develop a mailing list of people and organizations to notify about the
meetings.
ii. Develop and mail up to 10,000 notification postcards.
EA2-7
Rev 11/12/09
iii. Develop key messages to be communicated to the public regarding the
project.
iv. Prepare handouts for the open house meetings containing the key
messages.
v. Notify the media of the open house public meetings.
vi. Provide information to the TRVA and CITY for posting on their Web sites
and other publications and forums used by the TRVA and the CITY.
vii. One member of the ENGINEER'S team shall attend and facilitate each of
the 12 two-hour open house meetings, collect sign -in information, provide
handouts, record comments on an easel board or other means, and
provide a written summary of the public comments gathered at the public
meetings.
22. Deliverables:
L Five (5) 11"x17" copies of the CAC presentation.
ii. One DVD with an electronic copy of the presentation.
iii. Up to four (4) 36"x48" graphic boards.
iv. Meeting minutes documenting discussions of the CAC presentation and
the open -house public meetings.
B. 30% HENDERSON STREET DESIGN
1. Further develop the engineering plans to a 30% level as defined by TxDOT. The
extent of the Henderson Street bridge design is as shown in Exhibit A-3.
2. The design of the Henderson Street bridge will involve multiple reviews of the
construction documents at various stages (initial bridge layout, 30%, 60%, and
90%) and by various organizations (notably TxDOT, Fort Worth Western Railroad,
USACE, TRWD, and the City of Fort Worth). These reviews can take several
weeks each. To meet the required schedule for the construction of the Henderson
Street bridge, the ENGINEER will have to continue designing concurrently with
ongoing reviews, as opposed to waiting for review comments that could
significantly change the design. While efforts will be made to coordinate
Fn9-8
Rev 11/12/09
extensively with the various agencies before formal review submittals, if significant
design changes and rework are necessary due to major review comments that are
received after design has progressed, this rework will be considered an Additional
Service.
3. Update the current design schematic drawing.
4. Prepare bridge layout and railroad Exhibit A drawings.
5. Surveys for Design
i. CITY has previously obtained survey for this project and will provide that
data to the ENGINEER. No additional survey is included in this Scope of
Services except for survey of the railroad top of rail for a distance of 1,000
feet north of Henderson Street to 1,000 fee south of White Settlement.
Information gathered during the survey is assumed to include topographic
data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers, rim/invert
elevations, location of buried utilities, structures, and other features
relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at intersections is
assumed to already been verified by field surveys. Spot elevations are
assumed to be shown on intersection layouts with cross slope to fit
intersecting grade lines.
ii. The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include
the following:
1. A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set
while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400:
2. The following information about each Control Point;
a. Identified (Existing. City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8"
Iron Rod)
b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system,
and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum
only.
c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in
the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of
EA2-9
Rev 11/12/09
radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and
North Main Street).
d. Coordinates on all P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, Manholes, Valves,
etc., in the same coordinate system, as the Control.
e. No less than two horizontal bench marks, per line or
location.
f. Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines.
g. Station equations relating utilities to paving, when
appropriate.
6. Prepare 30% submittal plans for Henderson Street Bridge/Streetscape landscape
architectural elements including: vehicular and pedestrian paving; decorative
walks, plazas, and planters; decorative monuments, walls, and railings;
decorative vehicular and pedestrian lighting and signals; seating and trash
receptacles; signage and kiosks; and landscape planting.
7. Public Notification and Personnel/Vehicle Identification: When conducting site
visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall
carry information identifying the name of the company and the company
representative.
8. Complete a hydraulic analysis of the Henderson Street bridge design. Provide
summaries of hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities,
and valley storage impacts for the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF events.
i. Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses to the USACE along with a
written summary of the hydraulic impacts. Attend a two-hour meeting to
brief USACE and discuss. Provide the USACE's comments related to the
design upon receipt.
ii. Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
analyses, further modify the bridge design.
iii. Complete a final hydraulic analysis, including final technical memorandum
documenting the design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-
, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF events.
Rev 11/12/09
iv. Submit final HEC -RAS model with technical memorandum to USACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
v. Address USACE comments and provide final comment response.
9. Drainage Computations: ENGINEER will review and document the storm water
watershed drainage runoff area and existing street, right-of-way and storm sewer
capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at 1" = 200'
scale from available contour maps. Calculations regarding street and right-of-way
capacities and design discharges (5 -year and 100 -year frequencies) at selected
critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be
calculated and shown. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes
recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed
reasonable and consistent with City and TxDOT standards. All calculations and
design shall conform to TxDOT and the City of Fort Worth Storm Water
Management Design Manual, March 2006.
10. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost.
11. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 2 meetings with the CITY
and the TRVA during this phase.
12. Deliverables: 30% Engineering Plan Submittal
i. Ten (10) copies of the schematic drawing.
ii. Ten (10) copies of the bridge layout and railroad Exhibit A drawings.
iii. The ENGINEER shall furnish ten (10) 11"x17" copies of the 30%
engineering plans which include layouts, preliminary right-of-way needs
and cost estimates.
iv. The ENGINEER shall also evaluate the phasing of the street and
drainage work, and shall submit such evaluation in writing to the CITY.
Phase 2: Henderson Street Bridge Final Design
Phase 2, the final design of the Henderson Street bridge, will include the preparation of
construction bid documents including plans, specifications, and cost estimates in accordance with
TxDOT standards.
EA2-11
Rev 11/12/09
60% Engineering
Upon approval of the 30% plans, ENGINEER will prepare construction documents as
follows:
a. Drainage area maps with drainage calculations and hydraulic
computations.
b. Preliminary project plans and profile sheets which will show the following
and shall be on 22" x 34" sheets:
Property Ownership
Curb Lines
Driveways
Medians (if applicable)
Sidewalks
Existing and proposed water and sanitary sewer mains.
C. Proposed roadway profile grades and elevations along each curb line;
elevations at all p.v.i.'s; p.i's half stations; high and low points; vertical curve
information; and pertinent AASHTO calculations. Profiles for existing curbs
(if any) and existing ground at the left and right-of-way lines shall be shown.
Existing found property corners (e.g. Iron pins), along the existing right-of-
way shall be shown on the plans. Profiles for existing and proposed storm
drain mains and leads shall be provided.
d. Locations of existing utilities, including appropriate SUE investigations, are
being completed by others and are not a part of this scope. Based on
information received from others, existing utilities and utility easements will
be shown on the roadway plan and profile sheets. ENGINEER will
coordinate with utility companies and the City of Fort Worth to ascertain
what, if any, future improvements are planned that may impact the project.
e. Preliminary roadway cross-sections will be developed, from the survey
notes, at intervals not -to -exceed 50 foot along the project length and will
extend 10' past the right of way line on both sides of the street. Additional
cross-sections at important features including driveways, p.i.'s of
EA2-12
Rev 11/12/09
intersecting streets, (minimum distance of 100' along cross -street at each
P.I.) walks, retaining walls, etc., will also be provided. Profiles of centerline
of driveways will also be provided where necessary. Scale will be 1" = 10'
horizontal and 1" = Z vertical.
f. Street and intersection layouts.
g. Proposed plan/profile sheets will conform to TxDOT construction legend.
Adequate horizontal and vertical control shall be provided on the plan
sheets to locate all proposed and existing facilities. Legal descriptions (Lot
Nos., Block Nos., and Addition Names) along with property ownership shall
be provided on the plan view.
h. Bridge abutment retaining walls shall be designed as flood walls in
accordance with USAGE criteria.
Prepare 60% submittal plans and details for Henderson Street
Bridge/Streetscape landscape architectural elements including: vehicular
and pedestrian paving; decorative walks, plazas, and planters; decorative
monuments, walls, and railings; decorative vehicular and pedestrian lighting
and signals; seating and trash receptacles; signage and kiosks; and
landscape planting and irrigation.
Right -of -Way Research
The ENGINEER will verify right-of-way requirements already determined by
other consultants. A right-of-way map will be furnished by the CITY to the
ENGINEER for review and incorporation into the construction plans.
j. Right-of-wav/Easement Preparation and Submittal
Right-of-way and easement documents will be prepared by others and are
not a part of this scope. If any modifications to the right-of-way or
easement documents are necessary, ENGINEER shall mark up the right-
of-way map to show such modifications and submit to the CITY. New right-
of-way and easement documents will then be prepared by others.
k. Utility Clearance
Rev 11/12/09
EA2-13
Utility relocations are being completed by others and are not a part of this
scope. ENGINEER shall coordinate with other consultants completing
this work and provide these consultants with input on the extent of the
Henderson Street project so that utility relocations can be made.
I. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
ENGINEER will prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) required for the project for use by the Contractor during
construction. Engineer will prepare drawings and details for proposed
SWPPP improvement that the Contractor must use during construction.
Contractor will be responsible for filing the SWPPP with appropriate
regulatory agencies.
M. Traffic Control Plan
ENGINEER shall prepare a signed and sealed Traffic Control Plan for
review and approval by TxDOT and the Traffic Division of the
Transportation and Public Works Department.
n. Deliverables: 60% Construction Plan Submittal
i. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 60%
construction plans and specifications for review to both the CITY
and TxDOT (ten (10) sets total). Generally, plan sheets shall be
organized as follows:
• Cover Sheet
• General Layout and Legend Sheet
• Drainage Area Map and Computations
• Plan & Profile Sheets
• Preliminary Cross Sections
• Standard Construction Details
• Special Details (If applicable)
ii. The ENGINEER shall submit a preliminary estimate of probable
construction cost with the preliminary plans submitted. ENGINEER
EA2-14
Rev 11/12/09
shall assist CITY in selecting the feasible and or economical
solutions to be pursued.
o. Review Meetings with Citv
The ENGINEER shall meet with CITY to discuss review comments for 60%
submittal. The CITY shall direct the ENGINEER in writing to proceed with
Final Design for Final Review.
2. Final Construction Plan Submittal (90%,95%, and 100% submittals)
a. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 60% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 90% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 60% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total).
b. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 90% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 95% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 95% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed by the
ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be a
mylar, the rest bond.
C. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 95% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 100% plans and specifications and contract documents for
bidding purposes. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17"
100% construction plans and specifications to both the CITY and TxDOT
(ten (10) sets total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed
by the ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be
a mylar, the rest bond. One electronic PDF file containing all plans shall be
uploaded to the CITY'S Buzzsaw Web site.
d. Furnish as a function of final plans, ten (10) copies of the final cross-
sections on 22" x 34" sheets. Information on these sheets will include
centerline station, profile grades and centerline elevations, roadway section
(existing and proposed), right-of-way limits. Scale will be 1" = 20' horizontal
EA2-15
Rev 11/12/09
and 1" = 2' vertical with cross sections plotted with stationing from the
bottom of the sheet, and will include laterals and inlets. CITY policy with
regard to parking design shall be maintained. Excavation and embankment
volumes and end area computations shall also be provided.
e. Public Meeting: After the 100% plans have been reviewed and approved
by the City, the ENGINEER shall prepare project exhibits, and coordinate
one public meeting.
1. Develop a mailing list of people and organizations to notify about
the meeting.
2. Develop and mail up to 10,000 notification postcards.
3. Develop key messages to be communicated to the public
regarding the project.
4. Prepare handouts for the meeting containing the key messages.
5. Notify the media of the public meeting.
6. Provide information to the TRVA and CITY for posting on their
Web sites and other publications and forums used by the TRVA
and the CITY.
7. Attend and facilitate the meeting. Collect sign -in information,
provide handouts, and record comments on an easel board or
other means.
8. Provide a written summary of the public comments gathered at the
public meeting.
f. ENGINEER's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost: The ENGINEER
shall submit a final estimate of probable construction cost with the final
plans submitted.
g. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 5 biweekly meetings
with the CITY and the TRVA during this phase
Phase 3: North Main Street Bridge Final Design
Phase 3, the final design of the North Main Street bridge, will include the preparation of
EA2-16
Rev 11/12/09
construction bid documents including plans, specifications, and cost estimates in accordance with
TxDOT standards.
A. 30% NORTH MAIN STREET DESIGN
1. Further develop the engineering plans to a 30% level as defined by TxDOT. The
extent of the North Main Street bridge design is as shown in Exhibit A-4.
2. Update the current design schematic drawing.
3. Prepare bridge layout drawings.
4. Surveys for Design
i. CITY has previously obtained survey for this project and will provide that
data to the ENGINEER. No additional survey is included in this Scope of
Services. Information gathered during the survey is assumed to include
topographic data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers,
rim/invert elevations, location of buried utilities, structures, and other
features relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at
intersections is assumed to already been verified by field surveys. Spot
elevations are assumed to be shown on intersection layouts with cross
slope to fit intersecting grade lines.
ii. The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include
the following:
1. A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set
while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400:
2. The following information about each Control Point;
a. Identified (Existing. City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8"
Iron Rod)
b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system,
and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum
only.
c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in
the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of
EA2-17
Rev 11/12/09
radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and
North Main Street).
d. Coordinates on all P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, Manholes, Valves,
etc., in the same coordinate system, as the Control.
e. No less than two horizontal bench marks, per line or
location.
f. Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines.
g. Station equations relating utilities to paving, when
appropriate.
5. Prepare 30% submittal plans for North Main Street Bridge/Streetscape landscape
architectural elements including: vehicular and pedestrian paving; decorative
walks, plazas, and planters; decorative monuments, walls, and railings;
decorative vehicular and pedestrian lighting and signals; seating and trash
receptacles; signage and kiosks; and landscape planting.
6. Public Notification and Personnel/Vehicle Identification: When conducting site
visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall
carry information identifying the name of the company and the company
representative.
7. Complete a hydraulic analysis of the North Main Street bridge design. Provide
summaries of hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities,
and valley storage impacts for the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF events.
iii. Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses to the USACE along with a
written summary of the hydraulic impacts. Attend a two-hour meeting to
brief USACE and discuss. Provide the USACE's comments related to the
design upon receipt.
iv. Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
analyses, further modify the bridge design.
v. Complete a final hydraulic analysis, including final technical memorandum
documenting the design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-
, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF events.
EA2-18
Rev 11/12/09
vi. Submit final HEC -RAS model with technical memorandum to USACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
vii. Address USACE comments and provide final comment response.
8. Drainage Computations: ENGINEER will review and document the storm water
watershed drainage runoff area and existing street, right-of-way and storm sewer
capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at 1" = 200'
scale from available contour maps. Calculations regarding street and right-of-way
capacities and design discharges (5 -year and 100 -year frequencies) at selected
critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be
calculated and shown. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes
recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed
reasonable and consistent with City and TxDOT standards. All calculations and
design shall conform to TxDOT and the City of Fort Worth Storm Water
Management Design Manual, March 2006.
9. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost.
2. 60% Engineering
Upon approval of the 30% plans, ENGINEER will prepare construction documents as
follows:
C. Drainage area maps with drainage calculations and hydraulic
computations.
d. Preliminary project plans and profile sheets which will show the following
and shall be on 22" x 34" sheets:
Property Ownership
Curb Lines
Driveways
Medians (if applicable)
Sidewalks
Existing and proposed water and sanitary sewer mains.
EA2-19
Rev 11/12/09
k. Proposed roadway profile grades and elevations along each curb line;
elevations at all p.v.i.'s; p.i's half stations; high and low points; vertical curve
information; and pertinent AASHTO calculations. Profiles for existing curbs
(if any) and existing ground at the left and right-of-way lines shall be shown.
Existing found property comers (e.g. Iron pins), along the existing right-of-
way shall be shown on the plans. Profiles for existing and proposed storm
drain mains and leads shall be provided.
Locations of existing utilities, including appropriate SUE investigations, are
being completed by others and are not a part of this scope. Based on
information received from others, existing utilities and utility easements will
be shown on the roadway plan and profile sheets. ENGINEER will
coordinate with utility companies and the City of Fort Worth to ascertain
what, if any, future improvements are planned that may impact the project.
M. Preliminary roadway cross-sections will be developed, from the survey
notes, at intervals not -to -exceed 50 foot along the project length and will
extend 10' past the right of way line on both sides of the street. Additional
cross-sections at important features including driveways, p.i.'s of
intersecting streets, (minimum distance of 100' along cross -street at each
P.I.) walks, retaining walls, etc., will also be provided. Profiles of centerline
of driveways will also be provided where necessary. Scale will be 1" = 10'
horizontal and 1" = Z vertical.
n. Street and intersection layouts.
o. Proposed plan/profile sheets will conform to TOOT construction legend.
Adequate horizontal and vertical control shall be provided on the plan
sheets to locate all proposed and existing facilities. Legal descriptions (Lot
Nos., Block Nos., and Addition Names) along with property ownership shall
be provided on the plan view.
P. Bridge abutment retaining walls shall be designed as flood walls in
accordance with USACE criteria.
q. Prepare 60% submittal plans and details for Henderson Street
Bridge/Streetscape landscape architectural elements including: vehicular
and pedestrian paving; decorative walks, plazas, and planters; decorative
EA2-20
Rev 11/12/09
Exhibit A-4
North Main Schematic
Sheet 1 of 1
r. Right-of-Wav Research
The ENGINEER will verify right-of-way requirements already determined by
other consultants. A right-of-way map will be furnished by the CITY to the
ENGINEER for review and incorporation into the construction plans.
P. Right-of-way/Easement Preparation and Submittal
Right-of-way and easement documents will be prepared by others and are
not a part of this scope. If any modifications to the right-of-way or
easement documents are necessary, ENGINEER shall mark up the right-
of-way map to show such modifications and submit to the CITY. New right-
of-way and easement documents will then be prepared by others.
q. Utility Clearance
Utility relocations are being completed by others and are not a part of this
scope. ENGINEER shall coordinate with other consultants completing
this work and provide these consultants with input on the extent of the
Henderson Street project so that utility relocations can be made.
r. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
ENGINEER will prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) required for the project for use by the Contractor during
construction. Engineer will prepare drawings and details for proposed
SWPPP improvement that the Contractor must use during construction.
Contractor will be responsible for filing the SWPPP with appropriate
regulatory agencies.
S. Traffic Control Plan
ENGINEER shall prepare a signed and sealed Traffic Control Plan for
review and approval by TxDOT and the Traffic Division of the
EA2-21
Rev 11/12/09
Transportation and Public Works Department.
t. Deliverables: 60% Construction Plan Submittal
ii. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 60%
construction plans and specifications for review to both the CITY
and TxDOT (ten (10) sets total). Generally, plan sheets shall be
organized as follows:
• Cover Sheet
• General Layout and Legend Sheet
• Drainage Area Map and Computations
• Plan & Profile Sheets
• Preliminary Cross Sections
• Standard Construction Details
• Special Details (If applicable)
iii. The ENGINEER shall submit a preliminary estimate of probable
construction cost with the preliminary plans submitted. ENGINEER
shall assist CITY in selecting the feasible and or economical
solutions to be pursued.
U. Review Meetings with City
The ENGINEER shall meet with CITY to discuss review comments for 60%
submittal. The CITY shall direct the ENGINEER in writing to proceed with
Final Design for Final Review.
3. Final Construction Plan Submittal (90%, 95%, and 100% submittals)
h. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 60% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 90% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 60% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total).
Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 90% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 95% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
EA2-22
Rev 11/12/09
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 95% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed by the
ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be a
mylar, the rest bond.
Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 95% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 100% plans and specifications and contract documents for
bidding purposes. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17"
100% construction plans and specifications to both the CITY and TxDOT
(ten (10) sets total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed
by the ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be
a mylar, the rest bond. One electronic PDF file containing all plans shall be
uploaded to the CITY'S Buzzsaw Web site.
k. Furnish as a function of final plans, ten (10) copies of the final cross-
sections on 22" x 34" sheets. Information on these sheets will include
centerline station, profile grades and centerline elevations, roadway section
(existing and proposed), right-of-way limits. Scale will be 1" = 20' horizontal
and 1" = 2' vertical with cross sections plotted with stationing from the
bottom of the sheet, and will include laterals and inlets. CITY policy with
regard to parking design shall be maintained. Excavation and embankment
volumes and end area computations shall also be provided.
Public Meetinq: After the 100% plans have been reviewed and approved
by the City, the ENGINEER shall prepare project exhibits, and coordinate
one public meeting.
1. Develop a mailing list of people and organizations to notify about
the meeting.
2. Develop and mail up to 10,000 notification postcards.
3. Develop key messages to be communicated to the public
regarding the project.
4. Prepare handouts for the meeting containing the key messages.
5. Notify the media of the public meeting.
EA2-23
Rev 11/12/09
6. Provide information to the TRVA and CITY for posting on their
Web sites and other publications and forums used by the TRVA
and the CITY.
7. Attend and facilitate the meeting. Collect sign -in information,
provide handouts, and record comments on an easel board or
other means.
8. Provide a written summary of the public comments gathered at the
public meeting.
M. ENGINEER's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost: The ENGINEER
shall submit a final estimate of probable construction cost with the final
plans submitted.
n. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 5 biweekly meetings
with the CITY and the TRVA during this phase
Phase 4: White Settlement Bridge 30% Design
Phase 4 will include 30% level plans and estimates for the White Settlement bridge.
A. 30% WHITE SETTLEMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
1. Further develop plans to a 30% level as defined by TxDOT for the White
Settlement bridge. The extent of the White Settlement bridge design is as shown
in Exhibit A-5.
2. Update the current design schematic drawing.
3. Prepare bridge layout drawing, and a railroad Exhibit A drawings.
4. Surveys for Design
i. CITY has previously obtained survey for this project and will provide that
data to the ENGINEER. No additional survey is included in this Scope of
Services. Information gathered during the survey is assumed to include
topographic data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers,
rim/invert elevations, location of buried utilities, structures, and other
EA2-24
Rev 11/12/09
features relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at
intersections is assumed to already been verified by field surveys. Spot
elevations are assumed to be shown on intersection layouts with cross
slope to fit intersecting grade lines.
ii. The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include
the following:
1. A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set
while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400:
2. The following information about each Control Point;
a. Identified (Existing. City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8"
Iron Rod)
b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system,
and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum
only.
c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in
the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of
radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and
North Main Street).
d. Coordinates on all P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, Manholes, Valves,
etc., in the same coordinate system, as the Control.
e. No less than two horizontal bench marks, per line or
location.
f. Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines.
g. Station equations relating utilities to paving, when
appropriate.
5. Prepare 30% submittal plans streetscape landscape architectural elements
including: vehicular and pedestrian paving; decorative walks, plazas, and
planters; decorative monuments, walls, and railings; decorative vehicular and
pedestrian lighting and signals; seating and trash receptacles; signage and
kiosks; and landscape planting.
EA2-25
Rev 11/12/09
6. Public Notification and PersonnelNehicle Identification: When conducting site
visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall
carry information identifying the name of the company and the company
representative.
7. Complete a hydraulic analysis of the bridge design. Provide summaries of
hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities, and valley
storage impacts for the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF events.
L Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses to the USACE along with a
written summary of the hydraulic impacts. Attend a two-hour meeting to
brief USACE and discuss. Provide the USACE's comments related to the
design upon receipt.
ii. Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
analyses, further modify the bridge design.
iii. Complete a final hydraulic analysis, including final technical memorandum
documenting the design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-
, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year and SPF events.
iv. Submit final HEC -RAS model with technical memorandum to USACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
v. Address USACE comments and provide final comment response.
8. Drainage Computations: ENGINEER will review and document the storm water
watershed drainage runoff area and existing street, right-of-way and storm sewer
capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at 1" = 200'
scale from available contour maps. Calculations regarding street and right-of-way
capacities and design discharges (5 -year and 100 -year frequencies) at selected
critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be
calculated and shown. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes
recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed
reasonable and consistent with City and TxDOT standards. All calculations and
design shall conform to TxDOT and the City of Fort Worth Storm Water
Management Design Manual, March 2006.
EA2-26
Rev 11/12/09
9. No geotechnical engineering is included.
10. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost.
11. One member of the FN design team shall attend up to 2 biweekly meetings with
the CITY and the TRVA during this phase.
12. Deliverables: 30% Engineering Plan Submittal
i. Ten (10) copies of the schematic drawing.
ii. Ten (10) copies of the bridge layout and railroad Exhibit A drawings.
iii. The ENGINEER shall furnish ten (10) 11"x17" copies of the 30%
engineering plans which include layouts, preliminary right-of-way needs
and cost estimates.
iv. The ENGINEER shall also evaluate the phasing of the street and
drainage work, and shall submit such evaluation in writing to the CITY.
Phases 5: Henderson Street Bridge Construction Phase
Phase 5 is the construction phase of Henderson Street bridge. Since these are TxDOT on -system
roadways, the contract construction documents will be prepared in accordance with TxDOT
requirements, the project will be bid by TxDOT, and the construction phase will be managed by
TxDOT. As such, ENGINEER shall have limited involvement during construction.
BIDDING
a. Bid Documents: TxDOT will reproduce and distribute bid documents.
b. Bidding Assistance: The ENGINEER shall assist TxDOT during this phase
including preparation of one additional addendum and respond to questions
submitted to TxDOT by prospective bidders. TxDOT will reproduce and deliver any
additional addenda prior to bid opening to plan holders.
c. TxDOT shall prepare conformed or "As Bid" plans and specifications for use during
the construction phase.
d. TxDOT will make available for construction the final approved and dated plans and
specifications and contract documents for distribution to the contractor.
II. ASSISTANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION
EA2-27
Rev 11/12/09
a. The ENGINEER shall review contractor's submittals, including, requests for
information (up to 23 total), modification requests, shop drawings, and other
submittals in accordance with the requirements of the construction contract
documents for the project.
b. The ENGINEER shall attend up to six meetings total during bidding and
construction and provide documentation of the observations made, as requested
by CITY or TxDOT. This maximum number of meetings is all-inclusive, and
includes pre-bid meeting, pre -construction meeting, periodic site visits, meetings
with the TRVA or CITY on progress, final punch list meetings, or any other
meetings.
c. Record Drawings are not part of the scope of services.
d. ENGINEER will endeavor to protect CITY in providing these services however, it is
understood that ENGINEER does not guarantee the Contractor's performance, nor
is ENGINEER responsible for supervision of the Contractor's operation and
employees. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the means, methods,
techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, or
any safety precautions and programs relating in any way to the condition of the
premises, the work of the Contractor or any Subcontractor. ENGINEER shall not
be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person (except its own employees
or agents) at the Project site or otherwise performing any of the work of the Project.
EA2-28
Rev 11/12/09
J
W
Z O t
Z
a
U - 1 -
Exhibit A-3
`
Henderson Street Schematic
Sheet 1 of 2��
=VF,
1S N3linJ
�1 -
I o21
I $ALL ti
I �
t
I I '
�4 .--.._._.._4
- i
i- _.._.._._.. 1
S 1 I II \
� II
z
\� w>o II
0d O V
3 U M ZIO1
I Ia UOz
o
l a z C, I \
10 U :` I
W O] n
F I
I I tr I
f E I N U c0 I
mU.., m —
U O O m 0
O W 0 0 -
O O O
01 w
— O
a ` 3 + N —
—
' \ IZ O Z m
\ I \ U U Q 'D NLA
I
�� I ImUm nZ W
i --
U O Oi
I S NI lMNV2ij
o r n 0
i
\ a O10
\ Z 0 I-t0 N • I /
Exhibit A-3
Henderson Street Schematic
Sheet 2 of 2
/ I M
a "^I
,i I �bb6� dal+
� 1
\ t rl t t wW-z
L-
...
w 1�0
3 0 Henderson Street
i - - project limits
� o
LU
o i terminate at
1:iT sW .zk w oo.c approximately this
point
/\\\' of s
\ •
I } IFq�
h
U !,
I tC
I
• j"¢N 'w i
"" _ Mol / z '•/-' I �� � i _ s ""
4 ' / \ 1 w3C'llm 2Nll ¢ ¢W u
I z v) L ¢
o Ld
�. •� I I Lu V)
u
Exhibit A-5
` '�• White Settlement Schematic
• sem I I Sheet 1 of 2
Ln
�r L N! L
Lf 'G.
4 � •1 is IvIo83wwoo
i ZGul
G- J y J¢o
I
~'"'F — —N — • 'I..VI m 43 y.�Mr F--~N
N wwp 2 I WO
aaLL m3c), a a :o t
✓ s 5R *09 _
SON
, -
.Mv �Swa '`�� r! �a� 1S anHlatl
z
'•�STT -4 rt' O
t Nie ✓ 11a.
I w :3
45y `.:� Lu
w O
t �r
Jy F} R
� k l µ� Z
Y
is JV31N3380
r \ I I � � � ov+CY In
Q \ • • + j� Qj P on N+ +
P \ \• ! I II II II II II II II
O it v) p m \ I \•\ Ln uj
- N - O fV O P m \ I \ I- ¢
j + N �n cd
'n;
o nu O+ Q. \ \ . \ p
o L o \ oF Fo
Z Z W J
Z W O O J r I \V)
O fr
O I- l- I- I~- II ~ ~m O
V)O W
¢ Q W W H v) I- I- v) F M V)p O I +
I- ¢ u U 7 v) v) ¢ W+ \ P
J ¢ a a
o 3a¢a Saw I a-
- -
\
civ~) - -
O is l83dna
oo
— Jo I—
ls la3dna 00 01 J
ti Q I N
7 V 3LWo C9
�� — �0. — — — — — J
M1aawlZy{2- VR,
z
=UNN
F--
j
Exhibit A-5 �Nry
White Settlement Schematic j
Sheet 2 of 2
I �
a
N1-1 —
C�N — —
+
1S 183dn8
- - - - - - a - - - - - - I I� 0
I-
1S 183dna 00 01 — J
ti a
.I . 3Ow0I
J l0
F- U Z Qf-m
H W W a0 (V
=w J
O U~N I
a a u I I, wm3 tO
a'
� I J
Orn
J I I
W 1 F- N _
M m N I _ — — —z�cJ
3 o a I j p II, CV =+Qo mach
_ 00 C o
Q tO a I } 1Y7 <4 I -
— — I f �'NI tD
w
— minA— — — - - ----
Ln 0 i Oi -
I I Ln I
F-
O - - -; N - - � — J
J�o w
L -
3 Z <wz — —
c�Wo I��o - - - -
-
J Q Z J O • I —�wa �
Z O N
ate} �} I j c
W V) �-
��� 0W�
0
I ~N
w3(ZO
Jo J I p
Q��
;ZQ I Zoo —
Z Ld I <
ago I I L -�wn�in+r- I- - - -
wwn`- rz Iii I XLn I N
ZWF I , II Ln O-N
U~N —�ftf�i[!•f
m3crJ + I�
I' I
- No - 4tit t - -
I
I 1S N30VA
N 15 �30tlA
N
oral l9
a ' OOEo- �}
+l0 fV w+W
Li -z w d Q>
m U N Z W N
ATTACHMENT "B"
COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30%Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
I. Compensation
A. The total maximum compensation to the ENGINEER shall be $3,764,201.00 for
all phases, as described below and as shown in Exhibits "B-3A"and "B-313".
B. Phases 1 through 4, Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main
Street Bridges, and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge: The
ENGINEER shall be compensated a total lump sum fee of $3,658,951.00.
Payment of the total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the
services described in Attachment A and Exhibit "A-2" for all labor materials,
supplies, and equipment necessary to complete the project.
C. Phases 5, Henderson Street Bridge Construction Phase: For Phase 5, the
ENGINEER shall be compensated for hourly charges and expenses, with a total
not-to-exceed fee of $105,250.00. Payment of the total invoiced fee shall be
considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment A and
Exhibit "A-2" for all labor materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to
complete the project.
The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Exhibit "13-1"
Section 1 - Method of Payment. Each invoice is to be verified as to its accuracy
and compliance with the terms of this contract by an officer of the ENGINEER.
II. Schedule
Scope of services shall be completed in accordance with the schedule that will be
developed in accordance with Attachment"D."
3 Attachment 8 and Exhibits.doc
B - 1
f r
EXHIBIT "B-1"
METHOD OF PAYMENT
(Supplement to Attachment B)
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
I. Method of Payment
A. Phases 1 through 4, Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main
Street Bridges, and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge: Partial payment
shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon City's approval of an invoice from
the ENGINEER outlining the estimated current percent complete of the total
project.
B. Phase 5, Henderson Street Bridge Construction Phase: Partial payment
shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon CITY'S approval of an invoice
from the ENGINEER outlining the hourly labor costs and reimbursable expenses
incurred. Hourly labor costs shall be based on employee rates multiplied by the
labor multipliers specified in Exhibit "13-2". Direct expenses shall be reimbursed
at actual cost times a multiplier of 1.05. Reimbursable expenses include printing
and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and
subsistence, and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work,
including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and other work required to be done
by independent persons other than staff members.
II. Progress Reports
A. The ENGINEER shall submit to the designated representative of the Director of
the Department of Transportation and Public Works monthly progress reports
covering all phases of design in the format required by the City.
B. If ENGINEER determines in the course of making design drawings and
specifications that the opinion of probable construction cost as established by the
City's construction budget will be exceeded, whether by change in the scope of
the project, increased cost or other conditions, the ENGINEER shall immediately
report such fact to the City's Director of the Department of Transportation and
Public Works and, if so instructed by the Director of the Department of
Transportation and Public Works shall suspend all work hereunder.
3 Attachment Band Exhibits.doc
B1 - 1
1 ,
EXHIBIT"B-2"
LABOR MULTIPLIER SCHEDULES
(Supplement to Attachment B)
Design Services for
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No.00144
CONSULTANT LABOR MULTIPLIER
Freese and Nichols, Inc. 3.36
Rosales+Partners, Inc. 3.17
Civil Structures, Inc. 3.05
Open Channels Group, LLC 3.00
Blanton and Associates, Inc. 2.59
Savant Group, Inc. 2.97
Multatech Engineering, Inc. 2.81
Corven Engineering 2.84
AECOM USA Group, Inc. 3.05
Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 3.15
B2-1
EXHIBIT"B-3A"
(SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT"B")
Attachment A
Design Services for
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No.00144
SUMMARY OF FEE BY BASIC AND EXTRA SERVICES
Project Construction Costs:
Raw Construction %Design this %Raw Construction %Total Construction
Costs* Contract Costs this Contract Costs this Contract**
Henderson 16,075,375 100% $ 16,075,375 18,891,349
N Main 12,113,017 100% $ 12,113,017 14,942,933
White Settlement 15,156,785 30% $ 4,547,035 5,916,259
43,345,177 76% $ 32,735,427 39,750,541 121%
* Raw construction cost without contingency or escalation
**Includes contingency and escalation to equal$53.55M TRVA budget
Design Fee:
%of Raw %of Total
Fee Construction Construction
Basic services:
Design phase: $ 2,673,964 8.17% 6.73%
Construction administration: $ 105,250 0.32% 0.26%
$ 2,779,214 8.49% 6.99%
Extra services*** $ 488,483 1.49% 1.23%
$ 3,267,697 9.98% . 8.22%
Preliminary studies**** $ 496,505 1.52% 1.25%
Total: $ 3,764,201 11.50% 9.47%
***Extra Services
Landscape architecture and irrig. For$3.7M of landscaping(includes hardscape) $ 238,991
Agency coordination TxDOT USACE TRWD FWWR FWPA S+V $ 60,000
Geotechnical No borings,just more tests $ 55,000
Environmental and coordination with former team AECOM to finish environgeneral coordination $ 36,573
Reproduction Printing,boards plan sets etc. $ 26,009
TRVA meetings 36 meetings $ 22,000
City meetings during design $ 20,000
TxDOT environmental Meet review CE nothing else $ 12,000
SWPPP Storm water pollution prevention plan $ 7,200
Survey Additional survey needed for railroad Exh'A" $ 6,920
Accessibility review TAS/ADA reviews $ 3,790
$ 488,483
*—Preliminary Studies
Aesthetic bridge design studies Beyond typical conceptual design efforts $ 234,505
Investigate multiple bridge options Beyond typical conceptual design efforts $ 115,000
Stakeholder workshops and CAC meetings Presentationsgraphics,entire team $ 25,000
Hydraulic analyses CDM $ 28,000
Wall/bridge study Economize current wall design $ 12,000
Stakeholder meetings for input Four meetings $ 12,000
Open house meetings Limited team involvement
—. $ 31,000
Coordinate handscape elements For various bridge options $ 11,000
Renderings Of final bridge only $ 28,000
$ 496,505
EXHIBIT"B-313"
(SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT-B")
Design Services for
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30%,Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No.00144
SUMMARY OF FEES BY TEAM MEMBERS
Design Phase Construction Phase
Prelim 30%Hand 100%Hand 100%N Main 30%WS Henderson Main
Constructio
Design Phase n Phase Percent of
Consulting Firm Responsibility Phase 1A Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 (Lump Sum) (Cost-plus) Total Fee Contract
Freese and Nichols PM 103,661 22,114 115,000 95,000 15,000 15,732 350,775 15,732 366,507 9.7%
Freese and Nichols Civil 32,273 41,721 308,057 260,000 40,000 17,454 682,051 17,454 699,505 18.6%
Freese and Nichols Structural 9,745 28,010 372,882 378,239 40,000 50,311 828,876 50,311 879,187 23.4%
Freese and Nichols Storm water/Ublibes 3,143 15,659 12,520 22,433 13,763 2,357 67,519 2,357 69,876 1.9%
Freese and Nichols Innation - - 20,000 16,000 - 950 36,000 950 36,950 1.0%
Freese and Nichols Landscape Arch 11,000 16,885 87,356 77,419 17,013 3,367 209,673 3,367 213,040 5.7%
Freese and Nichols Construction services 5,809 2,112 5,674 5,674 2,112 21,380 21,380 0.6%
Freese and Nichols Expenses 8,071 15,864 44,496 41,535 15,730 1,429 125,696 1,429 127,125 3.4%
Freese and Nichols Sub markups 5% 15,372 4,204 23,171 20,119 800 650 - 63,666 650 64,316 1.7%
Subtotal 189,072 146,568 989,157 916,420 144,419 92,250 - 2,385,636 92,250 2,477,886 65.8%
M/WBE Sub-consultants
Rosales+partners Bridge architeclure 160,000 - 20,000 20,000 - 200,000 200,000 5.3%
Civil Structures,Inc.__ Brid a subsWcturel desi n 12,000 40,000 180,000 160,000 - 5,000 392,000 5,000 397,000 10.5%
Open Channels Group Public involvement 23,000 - 4,000 4,000 - - 31,000 31,000 0.8%
Mas-Tek Geotechnical - - 27,500 27,500 - - 55,000 55,000 1.5%
Gorrondona Survey - 6,920 - - - 6,920 6,920 0.2%
Blanton Associates Environmental - - - - 0.0%
Savant Group Traffic control and signals - - 74,040 45,000 15,000 4,000 134,040 4,000 138,040 3.7%
Multatech Electrical,misc CAD - - 139,992 129,992 - 4,000 - 269,983 4,000 273,983 7.3%
Accessolo y Accessibility review - - 1,895 1,895 - - - 3,790 3,790 0.1%
Johns Sons Reproduction 2,432 577 12,000 10,000 1,000 - - 26,009 26,009 0.7%
Subtotal 197,432 47,497 459,427 398,387 16,000 13,000 - 1,118,742 13,000 1,131,742 30.1%
NoMnIWBE Subconsuhants
Corven En ineenng Bridge structural design 90,000 - - - - 90,000 90,000 2.4%
AECOM Coordination/Environmental - 36,573 - - - - 36,573 36,573 1.0%
CDM H draulics 20,000 - 4,000 4,000 - - - 28,000 28,000 0.7%
Subtotal 110,000 36,573 4,000 4,000 - - - 154,573 - 154,573 4.1%
Total 496,505 230,638 1,452,583 1,318,806 160,419 1 105,250 3,658,951 105,250 3,764,201 100%
Exhibit"B-4" -Design Phase Task and Hour Breakdown
Client, City of Fort Worth
Project: TRV Bridges-Design
City Project No.: 00144
FNI Project Manager JFD
Project Phase
DisciplinePercent
1A: Prelim eval 18: 30%Hend 2: 100%Hend 3: 100%NM 4: 30%WS TOTAL FEE of Total
❑� 14% ❑� -/ ❑�6% 1 4036% ❑✓ 4%
Project M mt $103,661 $22,114 $115,000 $95,000 $15,000 $350,775 9.6%
TransportationAnf $32,273 $41,721 $308,057 $260,000 $40,000 $682,051 18.6%
Structural $9,745 $28,010 $372,882 $378,239 $40,000 $828,876 22.7%
Storm WaterlUtllities $3,143 $15,659 $12,520 $22,433 $13,763 $67,519 1.8%
Irrigation $20,000 $16,000 $36,000 1.0%
Landscape Arch $11,000 $16,885 $87,356 $77,419 $17,013 $209,673 5.7%
Construct Services $5,809 $2,112 $5,674 $5,674 $2,112 $21,380 0.6%
Subconsultants $322,804 $88,274 $486,598 $422,506 $16,800 $1,336,981 36.5%
Ex enses $8,071 $15,864 $44,496 $41,535 $15,730 $125,696 3.4%
TOTALS $496,505 $230,638 $1,452,583 $1,318,806 $160,419 $3,658,951 100.0%
IL
Phase 1 Fee:$727,143
CADocuments and SettingsWd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposaftProposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-00.09,Summary
Freese and Nichols.Inc_ ..........
O N r W T('7 cq T V7 T OD T ^ y
V7 c'7 I� N N tq O O N OD w 10
m
cl V
� A w w b9 4N9 b9 �bT9 O C d
N g w w x
3 w
IA m
go
3 M N O O O N rap D g q O a N
e O O w N w T w w V Ol O T c O
Ute » vi Nw i»mNr`t aDc* oa
cl
3 w
v w 3
0
D
10 N A
J TN 7op' T NNaTD 7
z w ID
N m
0 O
W cq r M aD tq(7 cq T cq O)M T e0 O N
C I� V N M(D O a0
N D T N(D f� O Ci IQ M
] r N Ow Cw r w fh Of cq Of cq N N
eD (CT r
g w w w w 69 fA Nw Cw E
3 y
m
O O O O O O O O O O ('� T c0 O M O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tq
w
Z N tq c'7 c'7 N cq�w O OD N�t- OD Now CoO �{O10 Do OON O a0 T
O O N N T w w w M W OD N M ] (D T I�T c, Of T c0 O cq('�N Of m'
U n w T w N w w w O N T m r aC C ('�I�('�Of V O N
O w w w w N 17 R M T O w N Of N c'7 N w c7
R w www w www ww Nw E9w Vl L
Ol Q 3 N W
r O ~ O 17 O P f 0 0 0 0 0 01 O c 0 O f
Ill O O a D O O/o O O O O N
I� N N O N OOf OIC OO OOOOf ('� O
C O O O N( C 0;N O7 aD O O aD w m M
J O?M T O T T T M cTva T O O!1+1 c7 ap N N N w
0
O Vl N N f� o'
Z w N NN w w w N w N
aD � N l6
V)
C m u� M o m v ua T g rn a u� aD rn aq ay o o O n
] N w OD 10 v(D O a0 N O N O) c 't r. ] cq c0 O p
Y N W T N T w w ('�T O Of cq 0O�
�w� w CO
Nw i» i»w� D m CR H aD
M \ 3 0
C o 0 c0 O O OD 0 0 O O T cq c0 O) M O
O N N V b�9 b09 N M V O aND cn A O O O O 0.
O
a
C 3 w www q M w � LL
� C a
ryO
.�. Of cq O o cqo 000 O d.
va o 10 orno 000 o m
D N T aD Of N O N N V7
J a0 07 T O T T T al COC r v N � V O N 0
O T V7 ('� T('7 Nww NfA� N O
(D M N N 0O aTD N aaD(00 aoD c�O y O O ONE O O O O O anp C
Y O OD w U)w w (D O) N cq aD O O o O),OD O O O O c'7 m
N
at O N(D cq N o 0 O O O O O T(D Of O N r cq O O 0 0 0 OD O
N cq O O N r V7 cp O M Y O T O r O)O 0 0 0 Of Y
3 N N N N T w w O OD cp O O I� OD Q1 N O N R N
A O mw T w w N N O)T C t: A C Oi f�c0 aC T V N t0 O
� CUw w F» w vfrnvaw 2; ]°D nw�N�ww Nw"9in a
in w w
m p D m p N O O ONE O OOf O O O O N p c
OCL O 0 0 0 T C
O N cq T T (�N N Of ay 3 00D c`O'I NNN NNN
a l N D N N N T
cq O T('7 c0 T V1 T c'�N T N a0 O N cD cq O C
O O r N
10 w w w w w w w OO W O yf]r O T cO N N y
N T M a0 C N OC w r wR w w w w w N .0.0y3 w 0
O0 w N o N 00 O O t0 M N T cq ODM p O of I�O O
N a0 f� O V7 O O N r O)c2 t0 O f—OD cl O 1- r N r
E O OD c0 N V w N a0 W t0 W N N O 47 N Of O
w M N w LO
3 in i»(»vi Nw��w m 3N pDIT U
C �
Q
C O O O O O coq O coq O cry m
J O OT T T T T M N N M cq C W C a,G ] N N Mcoq N Nw N
z m�NE�kaS E3 f9 vaw�w w
U .W
4 N O 0 0 0 0" m
'y m 0 a) q)Y Y L y m m @ a) O.> > > 32.:.: V c O O O O< O
V) a. V) . V) a) m D 3.C_.L L L A E H A w N Mr N N M
O O d N w
O N O O)0 0 0 0 0 0 O O W 0 0 0 �' C
0 cq 0
O(V c!j N c0 cn O N N O T e0 0 0 C; .0
V O w T O M c'7Ac
www E9 MCA E9 � to
F
C
v
e
ayi
d
j N y
C
NH •O�Nm m0o.U0`�0y0 �Oo. wN°m Q a`y wEC r
x
E
.�oy oy d E
C poO H 0eoU
ZoC p ot0a0
K � . 0,200 cc
m 0
D
m
W Z
r r m
s;so0 Bw;uud s;so0 pauyap jasn �a ndwo U-
3 � �/3
Project Mgmt $350,775
By: JFD 40 sheets
Chk'd:
Hours CAD Hours Cost
CaddApplicagon
Group Manager Engineer li Analyst with
Task John F.Dewar Alex Ivan Garcia Word Proce sor Davld J.Th-,.s
Raw Multiplier
Phase No. Task Description $66.81 $32.60 $20.00 $36.94
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 Internal ro'ect kick-off ml 16.0 24.0
$1,851 $5,934
3 '.Obtain/review,project data 12.0 12.0 12.0 16.0
$2,024 $6,487
4 Pro'act kick-off mt w/City 4.0 4.0 $398 $1,274
5 City/stakeholder/team tour 8.0 8.0 $795 $2.549
6 Initial stakeholder input ml s 12.0 12.0
$1,193 $3,823-
7 Public relations strategy dev't 4.0 $267 $856
8 Determine other data required 6.0 8.0 $662 $2,121
9 Attend 18 TRVA meetings 54.0 $3,608 $11,563
10 :Setup accounting 8.0 8.0 $795 $2,549
11 PM reporting 8.0 12.0 $926 $2,967
12 ''Evaluate technical aspects 24.0 $1,603 $5,139
13 Multiple design options prep 24.0 16.0 16.0 $2,445 $7,836
14 1 Order-of-magnitude cost est's 12.0 16.0 $1,323 $4,241
Q 15 Graphically illustrate designs 16.0 16.0 8.0 $1,886 $6,045
16 Review mt w/City 4.0 6.0 -----$-4-6-3-F $1,483
17 Stakeholder workshop 16.0 8.0 $1,330 $4,262
18 Coordinate team 30.0 24.0 $2,787 $8,9Y1-
19 Prepare CAC presentation 32.0 16.0 24.0 $3,546 $11,365
20 Interim design options prep 16.0 $1,069 $3,426
21 Order-of-magnitude cost esl's 12.0 $802 $2,569
22 'Gra hicall illustrate desi ns 16.0 16.0 32.0 $2,571 $8,240
SUBTOTALS 334.0 190.0 44.0 80.0 $32,344 $103,661
,0 1 Drafting by sheet,input below
C 2 Coordinate Tans 12.0 4.0 $932 $2,987
= 3 Assemble TxDOT submittal 2.0 8.0 $394 $1,264
ee 4 .Attend 2 TRVA meetings 12.0 $802 $2,569
5 Team management 40.0 40.0 $3,976 $12,744
6 PM reporting 8.0 8.0 $795 $2,549
00
SUBTOTALS 74.0 60.0 $6,900 $22,114
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 Team meetings 34.8 34.8 34.8 $4,740 $15,193
3 Cily meetings 34.8 17.4
$2,889 $9,261
4 _ TxDOT meetings 20.9 20.9 $2,074 $6,646
5 'PM reporting 17.4 $1,161 $3,722
6 Respond to TxDOT comments 17.4 86.9 34.8 $5,279 $16,920
'p 7 '.Coordinate team(26 weeks) 113.0
$7,549 $24,194
c 8 Assemble submittals 26.1 52.2 52.2 $5,369 1 $17,206
2
9 ,Resolve design issues 52.2 69.5 $5,751 $18,432
10 ,Attend 5 TRVA meetings 16.0 --$1,0-69-F. $3,426
N
SUBTOTALS 332.4 281.6 121.7 $35,8821 $115,000
1 :Drafting by sheet,input below
2 'Team meetings 28.6 28.6 28.6 $3,900 $12,499
3 Ci meetin s 28.6 14.3 $2,377 $7,618
Z 4 TxDOT meetin s 17.2 17.2 $1,706 $5,468
ve 5 PM reporting 14.3 $955 $3,062
00 6 Res and to TxDOT comments 14.3 71.5 28.6 $4,343 $13,919
.- 7 Coordinate team(26 weeks) 93.0 $6,210 $19,904
8 Assemble submittals 21.5 42.9 42.9 $4,417 $14,155
9 Resolve design issues 42.9 57.2 $4,731 $15,163
10 Attend 5 TRVA meetings 15.0 $1,002 1 $3,212
SUBTOTALS 275.3 231.7 100.1 $29,641 $95,000
1 Drafting by sheet,input-below
2Coordinate plans 8.3 2.8 $644 $2,064
3 Assemble TxDOT submittal 1.4 5.5 $272 $873
4 Attend 2 TRVA meetings 7.0 $468 $1,499
5 Team management 27.6 7.6 2 $2,747 $8,804
6 PM reporting 5.5 5.5 $549 $1,761
CD
ee\e
v
SUBTOTALS 49.8 41.4 4,680 15,000
GRAND TOTALS 1065.5 804.7 44.0 301.8 $109,447 $350,775
CADocumenls and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09%Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dscl
Freese and Nichols,Inc.
Transportation/Inf $682,051
BY: MAM 186 sheets
Chk'd: JFD
Hours CAD Hours Cost
Engineer Engineer l/ �-t� Technician 1v with
Task
Qv'utopher Brya Daniel Carlton G W ALJ Stephen].5
Raw Multiplier
Phase No. Task Descrition $47.20 $28.35 $30.74
1 Draftin b sheet,input below
2 ' eviewExistin Data 6.7 6.7 13.3 $912 $2,922
3 Stakeholder meeting 8.3 8.3 $628 $2,014
4 iCoordinate w/Utilities
L 5 Coordinate w/Railroad via TRVA 20.0 $614 $1,967
6 Coordinate w/Structures 5.0 10.0 $519 $1,662
7 Coordinate w/Draina a 3.3 6.7 $346 $1,108
8 Coordinate w/ROW 3.3 6.7 $346 $1,108
9_'Adjust Geometryas Needed 13.3 20.0 26.6 $2,012 $6,449
10 [Traffic Control Schematic-3 wl 6.7 6.7 6.7 $707 $2,267
11 ,Channel Design
12 :,Extract Quantities 13.3 13.3 $1,005 $3,222
13 'Coordinate w/TOOT 13.3 3.3 $722 $2,315
m 14 Pre are eetinq Minutes
15 Attend Worksho
y 16 Follow Up
Meetin s
a 17 iCoordinate w/Other Discipline4 6.7 13.3 $691 $2,216
18 1 Revise Conceptual Designs-4 wka
19 !Extract Quantities 10.0 13.3 $848 $2,719
20 Embankment vs walls
21 Attend Meeting
22 Coordinate w/Other Discipline
23 Refine Final Concept-4 wks
24 Extract Quantities
25 Prepare Exhibits 8.0 16.0 $719 $2,303
SUBTOTALS 89.8 116.1 82.5 K$8.115
$32,273
1 rafting b sheet,input below 264.0 $26,009
2 Title Sheet 1.0 4.0 $515
3 Exist.and Pro .T .Sect. 2.0 4.0 $666
4 Prelim.Summa Sheets 2.0 2.0 $484
5 Control Data Sheets 1.0 2.0 $333
6 Plan and Profile Sheets 8.0 8.0 $604 $1,937
_7 Prelim.Intersection Layouts 2.0 8.0 $321 $1,029
= _ Prelim.Traffic Control Plan 8.0 8.0 $604 $1,937
9 Drainage Area Mas 2.0 8.0 $321 $1,029
to 'Hydraulic Computations 1.0 8.0 $274 $878
M 11 Prelim.Culvert La outs 1.0 8.0 $274 $878
12 jUpdated Cost Estimate 2.0 4.0 $208 $666
.- 13 Existing Utilities Layout 1.0 8.0 $274 $878
14 Bridge Layout 4.0 8.0 $416 $1,332
15 Retaining Wall Layout ? 2.0 8.0 $321 $1,029
16 ISpecifications 4.0 8.0 $416 $1,332
17 Coordination with Subs 4.0 2.0 $246 $787
I SUBTOTALS 45.0 98.0 264.0 $13,018 $41,721
1 1 Drafting by sheet,input below 570.0 $17,522 $56,157
2 Coordinate with Utilities 16.8 16.8
$1,269 1 $4,068
3 Coordinate with Utilities 16.8 16.8
$1,269 1 $4,068
4 Verify Right of Way Requiremei 8.4 16.8 $873 $Q797
5 Coordinate with Utilities 16.8 16.8 $1,269 $4,068
6 Geotech Stud/Pavement Desk 16.8 16.8 $1,269 $4,068
7 Coordinate with Drainage 33.6 33.6
$2,538 $8,136
8 Coordinate with Landscape 33.6 33.6
$2,538 $8,136
9 ICoordinate with Bridge 33.6 33.6
$2,538 $8,136
10 .Coordinate with TCPlfrafic/Illu 50.4 50.4 $3,808 $12,204
11 ICoordinate with Walls 33.6 33.6
12 Coordinate with TxDOT 33.6 33.6 $2,538 $8,136
$2,538 1 $8,136
13 iTitle Sheet 4.2 8.4 $436 $1,399
14 Index 4.2 8.4 $436 $1,399
15 Pro ect Layout 8.4 16.8 $873 $2,797
16 Typical Sections 33.6 50.4 $3,015 $9,662
17 General Notes 33.6 33.6
$2,538 $8,136
18 Estimate and Quantity Sheets 16.8 33.6
$1,746 $5,594
19 Consolidated Summaries 16.8 33.6
$1,746 $5,594
20 TCP Typical Sections 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
21 :TCP Phase Narrative 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
22 TCP Phase Layouts 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
23 Temporary Traffic Signals,Muir 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
24 TCP Summary 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
25 TCP Standards 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
26 Roadway Alignment Data Shea 8.4 16.8 $873 $2,797
27 Roadway Plan&Profile Sheets 33.6 84.0
$3,967 $12,715
28 Intersection Details 33.6 84.0
$3,967 $12,715
29 Driveway Details 16.8 33.6
$1,746 $5,594
_30 Miscellaneous Details 16.8 16.8
$1,269 $4,068
C 31 RoadwayCross-Sections 33.6 84.0 $3,967 $12,715
= 32 Roadwa Summa 16.8 33.6 $1,746 $5,594
33 Roadway Standards 4.2 8.4 $436 $1,399
0 34 Retaining Wall Layouts 8.4 33.6
0 35 RetainingWall Plan&Profile S 8.4 33.6 $1,349 $4,324
36 Retainin Wall Details 2.1 2 1 $1,349 $4,324
$159 $508
C:\Documents and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposallProposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc2
Freese and Nichols.Inc
N 37 Retaining Wall Standards 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
38 H draulic/H drolo is Data 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
39 Scour Sheet 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
40 Culvert Layouts-All Types-Br 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
41 Draina a Plan&Profile Sheets 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
42 Drainage Standards 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
43 Existing Utility Plan&Profile St 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
44 Proposed Utility Plan&Profile 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
45 Utility Standards 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
46 Bridge Hydraulic Data 2.1 8.4 $337 $1,081
47 Bridge Layout 16.8 33.6
$1,746 $5,594
48 Detailed Bride Summaries 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
49 Structural Details 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
50 Traffic Signal Layout 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
51 Traffic Standards 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
52 Illumination Layout 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
53 Illumination Summary 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
54 Illumination Standards 2.1 2.1 $159 $508
__55__Signing Layout 8.4 33.6
56 $1,349 $4,324
Si nin Standards 4.2 q $
2
57 Pavement Markin Layout 16.8 33.6 $317 $1,017
58 Pavement Markin Summa $873
8.4 16.8 $ $5,594
$873 $2,797
59 Pavement Markin Standards 4.2 4.2 $317 $1,017
60SW3P Layout 4.2 16.8 $675 $2,162
61 'SW3P Summa 2.1
2. 4.2 $218 $899
62 'SW3P Standards 1 4.2 $218 $899
63 EPIC Sheet 4.2 8.4 $436 $1,399
64 S ecifications 84.0 84.0 $6,346 1 $20,339
65 Constriction Cost Estimate 33.6 33.6
$2,538 $8,136
66 Review Meeting w/CFW 8.4 8.4 $635 $2,034
SUBTOTALS 864.0 1,333.9 570.0 $96,119 $308,057
1 Drafting by sheet,input below 464.2 $14,270 $45,733
2 Coordinate with Utilities 14.3 14.3 $1,077 $3,453
3 Coordinate with Utilities 14.3 14.3
$1,077 $3,453
4
an Ri hl of Way Requiremei 7.1 14.3 $741 $2,374
5 Coordinate with Utilities 14.3 14.3 $1,077 $3,453
6 Geotech Stud/Pavement Desq. 14.3 14.3
7 Coordinate with Drainage 28.5 28.5 $1,077 $3,453
$2,155 $6,906
8 Coordinate with landscape 28.5 28.5
9 Coordinate with Bride 28.5 28.5 $2,155 $6,906
$2,155 $6,906
10 Coordinate with TCP/Traffic/Illu 42.8 42.8 $3,232 $10,359
11 Coordinate with Walls 28.5 28.5 $2,155 $6,906
12 Coordinate with TxDOT 28.5 28.5 $2,155 $6,906
13 Title Sheet 3.6 7.1 $370 $1,187
14 Index 3.6 7.1 $370 1 $1,187
15 Project Layout 7.1 14.3 $741 $2,374
16 ITypical Sections 28.5 -42 8 $2,559 $8,202
17 iGeneral Notes 28.5 28.5 $2,155 $6,906
18 Estimate and Quantity Sheets 14.3 28.5
$1,482 $4,749
19 Consolidated Summaries 14.3 28.5 $1,482 $4,749
20 TCP Typical Sections 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
21TCP Phase Narrative 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
22 TCP Phase Layouts 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
23 Temporary Traffic Signals,Illury 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
24 TCP Summary 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
25 TCP Standards 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
26 Roadwa Ali nmenl Dala Shee 7.1 14.3 $741 $2,374
27 Roadway Plan&Profile Sheets 28.5 71.3
28 Intersection Details 28.5 71,3 $3,368 $10,793
$3,368 $10,793
29 Driveway Details 14.3 28.5 $1,482 $4,749
30 Miscellaneous Details 14.3 14.3 $1,077 $3,453
adw
31 Roa Cross-Sections 28.5 71.3 $3,368 $10,793
32 Roadway Summary 14.3 28.5 $1,482 $4749
33 Roadway Standards 3.6 7.1 $370 $1,187
34 Retaining Wall Layouts 7.1 28.5
$1,145 $3,670
Z 35 Retaining Wall Plan 8 Profile S1 7.1 28.5 $1,145 $3,670
36
Retaining Wall Details1.8 1.8 $135 $432
0 37 RetainingWall Standards 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
38 Hydraulic/Hydrologic Data 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
39 'Scour Sheet 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
40 Culvert Layouts-All Types-Br 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
41 Drainage Plan&Profile Sheets 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
42 Drainage Standards 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
43 Existing Utility Plan&Profile St 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
44 Proposed Utility Plan&Profile 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
45 Utility Standards 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
46 Bridge Hydraulic Data 1.8 7.1 $286 $918
47 Bridge Layout 14.3 28.5 $1,482 $4,749
48 Detailed Bridge Summaries 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
49 Structural Details 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
50 Traffic Signal Layout 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
51 Traffic Standards 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
52 Illumination Layout 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
53 Illumination Summary 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
54 Illumination Standards 1.8 1.8 $135 $432
55 Uinkni Layout 7.1 28.5 $1,145 $3,670
56 Signing Standards 3.6 3.6 $269 $863
57 Pavement Marking Layout 14.3 28.5 $1,482 $4,749
58 Pavement Marking Summary 7.1 14.3 $741 $2,374
59 Pavement Marking Standards 3.6 3.6 $269 $863
60 SW3P Layout 3.6 14.3 $573 $1,835
61 SW3P Summary 1.8 3.6 A$2,155 $6,906
62 SW3P Standards 1.8 3.6
63 EPIC Sheet 3.6 7.1
64 Specifications 71.3 71.3
65 Construction Cost Estimate 28.5 28.5
CADocuments and Settings�fd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc2
Freese and Nichols Inr..
66 1 Review Meeting w/CFW 7.1 7.1 $539 $1,726
67 Public Meeting 3.6 3.6 $269 $863
68 Exhibits for Public Meeting 14.3 21.4 $1,280 $4,101
69 Misc.Supporting Bid Documeni 3.6 7.1 $370 $1,187
70 SWPPP in specs 35.7 $1,011 $3,239
SUBTOTALS 734.4 1,135.5 464.2 $81,124 $260,000
1 Drafting by sheet,input below 194.5 $5,979 $19,163
2 ITitle Sheet 1.3 5.3 $213 1 $683
3 Exist.and Prop.Typ.Sect. 2.7 5.3 $276 $883
4 Prelim.Summary Sheets 2.7 2.7 $200 $642
_ 5 Control Data Sheets 1.3 2.7 $138 $442
6 Plan and Profile Sheets 10.6 10.6 $802 $2,569
to 7 Prelim.Intersection Layouts 2.7 10.6 $426 $1,365
8 Prelim.Traffic Control Plan 10.6 10.6 $802 $2,569
9 Drainage Area Mas 2.7 10.6 $426 $1,365
0
10 Hydraulic ComMations 1.3 10.6 $363 $1,165
en 11 Prelim.Culvert Layouts 1.3 10.6 $363 $1,165
v 12 Updated Cost Estimate 2.7 5.3 $276 $883
13 Existing Utilities Layout 1.3 10.6 $363 $1,165
14 Bridge Layout 5.3 10.6 $551 $1,766
15 Retaining Wall Layout ? 2.7 10.6 $426 $1,365
16 Specific tions 5.3 10.6 $551 $1,766
17 Coordination with Subs 5.3 2.7 $326 $1,043
SUBTOTALS 59.7 130.0 194.5 $12,481 $40,000
GRAND TOTALS 1792.9 2813.5 1575.3 1 $21Z811 $682,051
Input sheet titles,numbers,and hours to draft:
CAD Drafting Hours by Phase
Sheet Title Sheet No. 1A:Prelim eval 1B:30%Hand 2: 100%Hend 3: 100%Nif 4:30%WS
1 Title Sheet 1 8.0 11.0 8.8 5.9
2 Index 1 8.0 11.0 17.6 5.9
3 1 Project Layout 2 16.0 22.0 17.6 11.8
4 ITypical Sections 2 22.0 4.8
5 'General Notes 10 8.0 6.0 17.6 5.9
6 Estimate and Quantity 4 8.0 22.0 17.6 5.9
7 ;Consolidated Summaries 4 8.0 22.0 1.6 5.9
8 'TCP Typical Sections 2 16.0 2.0 1.6 11.8
9 TCP Phase Narrative 2 2.0 1.6
10 TCP Phase Layouts 8 8.0 2.0 1.6 5.9
11 Temporwy Traffic Signals,IllurT 2 8.0 2.0 1.6 5.9
12 TCP Summary 1 8.0 2.0 1.6 5.9
13 TCP Standards 10 16.0 2.0 17.6 11.8
14 Roadway Alignment Data Shea 4 1 16.0 22.0 17.6 11.8
15 Roadway Plan&Profile Sheets 8 22.0 17.6
16 Intersection Details 5 22.0 1 17.6
17 Driveway Details 2 22.0 17.6
18 1 Miscellaneous Details 2 8.0 22.0 26.4 5.9
19 RoadCross-Sections 20 16.0 33.0 8.8 11.8
20 Roadway Summary 1 32.0 11.0 8.8 23.6
21 1 Roadway Standards 20 11.0 17.6
22 1 Retaining Wall Layouts 4 32.0 22.0 17.6 23.6
23 Retaining Wall Plan&Profile S 8 22.0 1.6
24 Retaining Wall Details 2 24.0 2.0 1.6 17.7
25 Retaining Wall Standards 10 24.0 2.0 1.6 17.7
26 Hydra lic/Hdrolo is Data 1 2.0 8.8
27 Scour Sheat 1 1 11.0 1.6
28 Culvert Layouts-All Types-Bride Class 2.0 1.6
29 Drainage Plan&Profile Sheets 2.0 1.6
30 Draina a Standards 2.0 4.8
31 Existing Utility Plan&Profile Sheets 6.0 4.8
32 Proposed Utility Plan&Profile Sheets 6.0 1.6
33 Utility Standards 2.0 8.8
34 Bridge Hydraulic Data 2 11.0 17.6
35 Bride Layout 2 22.0 1.6
36 1 Detailed Bridge Summaries 2.0 1.6
_37 Structural Details 2.0 1.6
38 Traffic Signal Layout 2.0 1.6
39 Traffic Standards 2.0 1.6
40 Illumination Layout 2.0 1.6
41 Illumination Summary 2.0 1.6
42 Illumination Standards 2.0 17.6
43 Signing Layout 4 22.0 8.8
44 Signing Standards 10 11.0 17.6
45 Pavement Marking Layout 4 22.0 8.8
46 Pavement Marking Summary 1 11.0 8.8
47 Pavement Marking Standards 10 11.0 17.6
48 SW3P Layout 4 22.0 8.8
49 SW3P Summary 1 11.0 8.8
50 SW3P Standards 5 11.0 8.8
51 EPIC Sheet 1 1 11.0 13.6
52 .Exhibits for Public Meeting 5 17.0 1 17.0
186
Total Drafting Hours: 264.0 570.0 464.2 194.5
CADocuments and Settingsyfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposaftProposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-0 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc2
Freese and Nichols.Inc. ,...-
Structural $828,876
By: VBK 84 sheets
Chk'd: JFD
Mows CAD Haws cost
&g*-,V 6Vk~I Ergh-VI Eno,eer W Technklan Iv
Task I-P.-t.,Kau [H--kMoon Lnio Dm-
rd .,I=-W.ts_E Wht�.I
L _ r 1.
Ph=@ Ho. Tisk D"W"M $41.09 $28.73 $56.07 $51.18 $33.81
Drafting by sheet,input below
Attend CAC meeting 2 $82 $20
Meetings(2) 12 $493 $1,580
.X- 4 Review Conceptual Designs 60 $2,465 $7,902
SUBTOTALS 74 1 $9,745
1 Drafting by sheet input below 202 $6,816 $21,845
WA,6; W,
2 Reviewing RW geotech report,coordinations 6 3 1 $389 $1,247
C: 3 Reviewing RR geotech report,coordinations 3 1 1 $195 $623
4 Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bridge 4 2 1 $257 $823
5 Review CSI substructure drawings 2 3 0 $173 $555
6 Reviewing channel geotech report,coordinabor 3 1 1 $195 $623
7 Coordinations with CSI onspliced girder bridge 6 3 1
$342 $1,096
8 Review CSI substructure drawings 6 3 1 $373 $1,197
- i 7
SUBTOTALS 28 17 5 202 $8,740 $28,010
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
,1 11 � I'�I.,-111�1- 1146 $38,729 $124,127
2 Reviewing RW geotech report,coordinations 6 3 1 $389 $1,247
3 Review wail layouts 28 6 $1,465 $4,694
4 Review CSI wall design and detalis 56 28 6 $3,419 $10,959
5 Respond to 30%RW comments 1 3 1 $177 $568
6 Respond to 60%RW comments 1 1 6 1 $258 1 $826
7 Respond to 90%RW comments 1 3 1 $177 $568
8 Reviewing RR geotech report,coordinations 3 1 1 $195 $623
9 Railroad bridge geometry calculations 28 56 6 $3,073 $9,850
10 Railroad bridge beam design 28 56 3 $2,916 $9,347
11 RR Bridge deck design 3 8 1 $435 $1,394
12 Railroad bridge beam bearing pad design 3 6 $276 $884
13 Railroad bridge quantities estimate 17 28 6 1 $1.809 $5,797
14 Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bridge 35 20 5 1 $2,311 $7,408
15 Railroad bridge internal QC 17 28 8 $1,943 $6,228
'73 16 Review CSI substructure drawings 15 28 3 $1,559 $4,996
17 Respond to RR 30%comments 6 11 3 $709 $2,272
Z 18 Respond to RR 60%comments 17 28 3 $1,652 $5,294
�9 Respond to RR 90%comments 6 11 1 $630 $2,020
20 Reviewing channel geotech report,coordinatio 3 1 1 $195 $623
-21 Spliced girder bridge geometry calculations 101 168 4 $9,193 $29,463
22 Spliced girder bridge beam design 78 168 4 $8,272 $26,513
23 Channel Bridge deck design 3 6 1 $315 $1,010
24 Spliced girder bridge construction sequence 84 56 1 4 $5,285 $16,937
25 Spliced girder bridge post-tensioning design 168 112 4 $10.345 $33.156
26 Spliced girder bridge of bearing design 17 11 6 $1,326 $4,250
27 Spliced girder bridge quantities estimate 22 42 4 $2,351 $7.536
28 Coordinations with CSI on spliced girder bridge so 25 5 $3,078 $9,863
29 Spliced girder bridge internal QC 28 45 16 $3,335 $10,688
30
10'en30 Review CSI substructure drawings so 25 4 $3,019 $9,676
31 Respond to channel 30%comments 8 17 3 $985 $3,156 1
32 Respond to channel 60%comments 28 56 3 $2,916 $9,347
33 Respond to channel 90%comments 17
28 1 3 $1,652 $5.294
34 Meeting with fabricators and contractors 28 28 1 $1,955 $6,266
35 External QC by Corven Engineering
SUBTOTALS 1 956 1112 114 1148 $116,345 $372,552
11/12/2009,1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols,inc. CADocuments and Settngskjfd%DesktopkTRV Bridges on laptopTee proposalklProposal 10-30-09kExhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc3
1 Drafting by sheet,in2ut below V"k ,"�"4V 1173 $39,645 $127,062
i 2 Reviewing RW geotech report,coordinations 2 2 1 $232 $745
3 Review wall layouts 29 6 $1,499 $4,805
4 Review CSI wall design and details 57 28 6 $3,481 $11,157
5 Respond to 30%RW comments 1 3 1 $185 $594
6 Respond to 60%RW comments 1 6 1 $264 $845
7 Respond to 90%RW comments 1 3 1 $581
8 Reviewing RR otech report,coordinations 3 1 1 $199 $638
9 'Railroad bddge geometry calculations 29 57 6 $3,146 $10,083
10 Railroad bddge beam design 29 57 3 $2,985 $9,568
11 RR Bridge deck design 3 9 1 $445 $1,427
12 Railroad bridge beam bearing pad design 3 6 $282 $905
13 Railroad bridge quantities estimate 17 ---29 6 $1,852 $5,934
14 Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bridge 36 71- 5 $2,366 $7,583
15 Railroad bridge internal QC 17 29 4 $1,754 $5,623
16 Review CSI substructure drawings 15 28 3 $1,596 $5,115
17 Respond to RR 30%comments 6 11 3 $726 $2326
c 18 Respond to RR 60%comments 17 29 3 $1,691 $5,419
19 Respond to RR 90%comments 6 11 1 $645 $2,068 1
20 Reviewing channel otech report,coordinatio 3 1 1 $199 $638
ni 21 Spliced girder bridge geometry calculations 103 -
172 4 $9,405 $30,142
2=2 Spliced girder bridge beam design 8-0 172 4 $8,463 r$27,123
23 Channel rid a deck design -
3 6 1 $323 $1,034
1 24 Spliced girder bridge construction sequence 86 57 4 $5,404 $17,321
$33,923
5 Spliced girder bride post-tensioning design 172 115 4 $10,584 P2-&_Spliced girder bridge of bearing design 17 11 2 $1,148 $3,680
2=7 Spliced girder bridge quantities estimate 23 43 2 $2,290 $7,338
28 Coordinations with CSI onspliced girder bridge 52 26 2 $2,973 $9,529
29 Spliced girder bridge internal QC 29 46 16 $3,392 $10,873
30 Review Review CSI substructure drawings 52 26 2 $2,973 $9,529
31 Respond to channel 30%comments 9 17 --3 $1,008 $3,231
32 Respand to channel 60%comments 29 57 3 $2,985 $9,568
33 Respond to channel 90%comments 17 2-9 3 $1,691 $5,419
34 Meeting with fabricators and contractors 29 29 $2,001 $6,414
35 External QC by Corven Engineering
SUBTOTALS 975 1137 100
1173 $118,010 $3742"
1 Drafting by sheet,input below 243 $8,230 $26,377
2 Reviewing RW geotech report,coordinations 12 6 3 $860 $2,756
3 Reviewing RR otech report,coordinations 6 3 2 $430 $1,378
4 Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bridge 9 5 1 $568 $1,819
5 Review CSI substructure drawings 4 7 1 $383 $1,227
6 Reviewing channel otech report,coordination 6 3 2 $430 $1,378
7 Coordinations with CSI ons liced girder bridge 12 6 1 $756 $2,422
-R-emiew CSI substructure drawings 12
6 2 $825 $2,644
SLMTOTAL.8 62 37 12 243 $1401 ,000
GRAND TOTALS L 2095 2302 231 2763 $258,622 $828 876
Input sheet titles,numbers,and hours to draft.
CAD Drafting Holes by Phase
abw Two Sheet Na IA:Praft MW 18;30%Hand 2.,100%HwW 3: 100%NX L-30%INS
1 EB ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 1 7.7 7.9
2 EB HENDERSON BRIDGE LAYOUT 3 67.2 69.2 70.9 81.1
3 EB HENDERSON TYPICAL SECTIONS 2 13.4 13.8 14.2 16.2
4 EB HENDERSON BORING DETAILS 320.2 20.8 21.3 243
5 EB HENDERSON SEC.OF CONSTRUCTION 2 38.5 39.4
6 EB HENDERSON FRAMING PLAN 4 76.9 78-8
7 EB PRESTRESSED CONC U-BEAM DESIGN E 1 5.8 5.9
8
EE PRESTRESSED CONC TY VI BEAM DESV 5.9
1 5.8 1:F -
HENDERSON POST-TENSIONING DETAII 2 38.5 39.4
10 EB PRECAST CONC TY VI BM DETAILS 4 123.1 126.0
11 EB HENDERSON BEAM SPLICING DETAILS 2 38.5 39.4
12 EB HENDERSON SLAB PLAN -4 92.3 94.5
13 EB HENDERSON SLAB TYPICAL SECTIONS 1- 15.4 158
14 EB HENDERSON DEFLECTION DIAGRAMS 2 38.5 39-4
-
WB ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 1 7.7
- 79
WB HENDERSON BRIDGE LAYOUT 3 67.2 69.2 70.9 81.1
dl
WB HENDERSON TYPICAL SECTIONS 2 13.4 13.8 14.2 16.2
WB HENDERSON BORING DETAILS 3 20.2 20.8 21.3 24.3
WB HENDERSON SEQ.OF CONSTRUCTION 2 76.9 78.8
WB HENDERSON FRAMING PLAN 4 5.8 5.9
MB PRESTRESSED CONC U-BEAM DESIGN! 1 5.8 5.9
WB PRESTRESSED CONC TY VI BEAM DESI 1 38.5 39.4
WB HENDERSON POST-TENSIONING DETAI 2 123.1 1260
WB PRECAST CONC TY VI BM DETAILS 4 38.5 39.4
WB HENDERSON BEAM SPLICING DETAILS 2 92.3 94.5
WB HENDERSON SLAB PLAN_ 4 15.4 15.8
WB HENDERSON SLAB TYPICAL SECTIONS 1 38.5 39.4
WB HENDERSON DEFLECTION DIAGRAMS 2 4.8 4.9
84 20 TXDOT STANDARDS 20 9.6 9.8
Total Drafting Hours: 201.6 1145.5 1172.6 243.4
11/12/2009,1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols,Inc. CADocuments and Setbngs\fld\DesktopXTRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposaRProposal 10-30-09\Exhibit R4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc3
Storm Water/Utilities $67,519
By: SKH 11 sheets
Chk'd: KDD
MW CAD Hours Coat
Eng peer V EnoN N Enyneer l Tedw*i n it WN1
T.k Kelly Diane Dilla� Scott K nsolving [usGn T.Oswald [ Bryan Ke th eoy ti Raw Al1.W W
PIM. NO. Taa1r $48.32 $31.39 $27.15 $21.90
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 Assemble GIS data for team 1.0 16.0 16.0 $901 $2,888
3 Attend kick-of 1.0 1.0 $80 $255
4 Attend stakeholder meetings
5 Evaluate three hydraulic options
6 Coordinate utilities
a 7 Attend workshop
Q 8 Coordinate with CDM
-
9 Prepare exhibits
SUBTOTALS 2.0 17.0 16.0 $961 $3143
1 Drafting by sheet,input belowQU&VTKIM ""'W'
2 Drainage Areas 0.9 3.4 9.4 6.8 $551 $1,765
a 3 Inlet&ROW Capacity Calcs 0.7 2.7 8.2 2.7 $399 $1,280
z 4 Inlet and SO Demo 1.4 1.4 5.4 $199 $637
= 5 P&P Sheets-Inlet Leads(4 I 1.413.6 27.2 27.2 $1,827 $5,855
6 Storm Drain Extension on Hen 1.4 8.2 16.3 16.3 $1,122 $3,597
M 7 Flumes Adjacent to Walls 2.7 5.4 2.7 $293 $938
_8 Temporary Drainage Structure 0.9 3.4 3.4 3.4 $315 $1,008
0^ 9 Details-Inlets,Manholes,Em 0.2 1.4 2.0 3.4 $181 $579
10 Specs
11 Bridge Scour
SUBTOTALS 5.3 36.7 73.3 68.0 $I,d66 $13,659
1 Drafting by sheet,input below A,
2 Drainage Areas
a 3 Inlet&ROW Capacity Calcs 0.2 0.7 2.0 0.7 $100 $320
4 Inlet and SO Demo 0.3 0.3 1.4 $50 $159
= 5 P&P Sheets-Inlet Leads(4 loc 0.3 3.4 6.8 6.8 $457 $1,464
e 6 Storm Drain Extension on Hen 0.3 2.0 4.1 4.1 $281 $899
oc 7 Flumes Adjacent to Walls 0.7 1.4 0.7 $73 $234
�- 8 Temporary Drainage Structure 0.9 3.4 3.4 3.4 $315 $1,008
N 9 Details-Inlets,Manholes,Emb 1.5 12.2 18.4 30.6 $1,627 $5,214
10 Specs 1.7 34.0 $1,005 $3,222
SUBTOTALS 4.9 22.8 70.1 47.6 $3,907 $1;520
1 Drafting by sheet,input belowz-s-
2 Drainage Areas 1.1 4.4 17.6 8.8 $862 $2,762
3 Inlet&ROW Capacity Calcs 1.1 2.2 4.4 2.2 $290 $929
4 Inlet and SD Demo 2.2 4.4 2.2 $237 $759
2 5 P&P Sheets-Inlet Leads(4 l0 1.1 14.9 29.9 29.9 $1,987 $6,370
c 6 Storm Drain Extension on Hen 1.1 4.4 8.8 8.8 $623 $1,996
0 7 Flumes Adjacent to Walls 2.2 2.2 2.2 $177 $567
8 Temporary Drainage Structure 0.9 3.7 3.7 3.7 $341 $1,093
�i 9 Details-Inlets,Manholes,Emb. 2.2 17.6 26.4 $1,376 $4,409
10 Specs 1.9 37.4 $1,107 $3,549
11 Bridge Scour
SUBTOTALS 9.4 51.6 134.8 57.8 $7,000 $22,433
1 Drafting by sheet,input belowr -qtr,
2 Drainage Areas 0.7 3.0 8.2 6.0 $484 $1,551
3 Inlet&ROW Capacity Calcs 0.6 2.4 7.2 2.4 $351 $1,125
4 Inlet and SD Demo 1.2 1.2 4.8 $175 $560
5 P&P Sheets-Inlet Leads(4 Io 1.2 12.0 23.9 23.9 $1,606 $5,146
6 Storm Drain Extension on Hen 1.2 7.214.3 14.3 $986 $3,162
7 Flumes Adjacent to Walls 2.4 4.8 2.4 $257 $824
8 Temporary Drainage Structure 0.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 $276 $886
9 Details-Inlets,Manholes,Emb 0.1 1.2 1.8 3.0 $159 $509
c 10 Specs
11 Bridge Scour
v
USTV S 4.6 32.3 64.4 59.8 1J,
GRAND TOTALS 26.2 160.4 342.9 249.2 $21,067 $67,519
11/12/2009,1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols,Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc4
Input sheet titles,numbers,and hours to draft:
CAD Drafty Nous by 1`11 e
Sheet TNN Sheat No. IA: PrWim ave/ 19: 30%Nand 1 100%Hand 3: 100%AW 4: 30%WS
1 Drainage areas
2 Inlet 3 ROW Capacity Calcs
3 Inlet and SD Demo
4 Inlet and SD Demo
5 P&P Sheets-Inlet Leads 4 locations)
6 P&P Sheets-Inlet Leads 4 locations)
7 Storm Drain Extension on Henderson
8 Flumes Adjacent to Walls
9 Temporary Drainage Structures Prior to Channel Construction
10 Details-Inlets,Manholes,Embedment
11 Details-Inlets,Manholes,Embedment
Total Drafting Hours:
11/12/2009,1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols,Inc. C:\Documents and Settingslfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc4
Irrigation $36,000
By: TWZ 10 sheets
Chk'd:
Hours GAD Mows cost
SW1WDs31gner Dealpner# Wfth
Teak
Robert l Kinkel VScott Thomas Va 'W R
Phase N0. Task $5140 $42.85 $30.35
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
E
a
SUBTOTALS
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
. e
O
SUBTOTALS
1 Drafting by sheet,input below . y ���z°' a$ J 72.0 $2,185 $7,004
c a 2 Design 2.0 34.2 $1,571 $5,035
o c 3 OC 8.0 8.0 $770 $2,468
_ 4 Specs 16.0 $686 $2,197
N
5 Cost estimate coons 8.0 $343 $1,099
6 Meetings 16.0 $686 $2,197
SUBTOTALS 10.0 82.2 72.0 $6„210 $20,000
1 Drafting by sheet,input below e EWE%f Sr, r ue� t fa „aay 47.0 $1,426 $4,572
e 2 Design 2.0 20.8 $996 $3,192
p 3 QC 8.0 4.0 $599 $1,918
2 4 Specs 14.0 $600 $1,923
ri 5 Cost estimate coord 8.0 $343 $1,099
6 Meetings 16.0 $686 $2,197
SUBTOTALS 10.0 70.8 47.0 $11662 $14000
1 Drafting by sheet,input below K
0
TOT
GRANDTOTALS 20.0 152.9 119.0 $11,233 $36,000
Input sheet titles,numbers,and hours to draft:
CAD DraRkp Howe by Phase
Shoat TNN Shoat No. 1A:Preft oval 18:30%HWW 2: 100%Heed J: 100%AMI 4:30%WS
1 Legend 6.0 2.0
2 Irrigation plan 8.0 6.0
3 Irrigation plan 8.0 6.0
4 Irrigation plan 8.0 6.0
5 Irrigation plan 8.0 6.0
6 Irrigation plan 8.0 6.0
7 Irrigation plan 8.0 6.0
8 Irrigation plan 6.0 3.0
9 Irrigation plan 6.0 3.0
10 Details 6.0 3.0
Total Drafting Hours: 72.0 47.0
11/12/2009,1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols,Inc.CADocuments and SettingsWd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc5
Landscape Arch $209,673
By: DT 22 sheets
Chk'd:
How* CAD Hors cost
Landscape ArdWect V AmhMedurd Intem I AmhBechaW Intim I Wmr
Task Dwight E.Taylor ]orge Maximilian Catherine Amelia R.
PhNo. Task $37.98 $24.31 $21.61
1A Drafting by sheet,input below
mn/a Internal project kick-off mtg 2.0 $76 $243
E a Obtain/review ro'ect data 12.0 12.0 $715 $2,291
b Develop Hardscape Linkages 69.6 $2,641 $8,466
C
Q -
SUBTOTALS 83.6 12.0 4432 $11,000
1 B Drafting by sheet,input below
e Henderson
= a 30%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 33.3 66.6 $2,704 $8,667
o b 30%Cost Estimate 6.7 6.7 $397 $1,272
c 30%Team Mt s/Coord 33.3 6.7 $1,408 $4,514
d 30%Review Mtgs City/Others 10.0 $379 $1,216
m e Team/Art MtgslCoord• 10.0 $379 $1,216
SUBTOTALS 93.3 79.9 $4268 $148!5
2 Drafting by sheet,input below . . , x„//s r•, r;� W.,�� ,
30%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 33.3 16.0 $1,610 $5,161
_ 30%Cost Estimate 6.7 6.7 $397 $1,272
30%Team Mt s/Coord 33.3 6.7 $1,408 $4,514
30%Review Mt s City/Others 10.0 $379 $1,216
Team/Art Mt s/Coord• 10.0 $379 $1,216
60%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 66.6 16.0 16.0 $3,264 $10,460
60%Cost Opinion 13.3 10.0 $722 $2,313
_ 60°/Team/Art Mt slCoord• 50.0 5.0 $2,005 $6,425
a 60 Review Mtgs City/Others 10.0 $379 $1,216
190%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 66.6 16.0 16.0 $3,264 $10,460
=
90%Cost Opinion 13.3 10.0 $722 $2,313
0
90%Team/Art MtgslCoord• 50.0 3.3 $1,969 $6,310
oc W-0/.Review Mtgs City/Others 10.0 $379 $1,216
95%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 50.0 8.0 8.0 $2,264 $7,256
N 95%Hardscape/Plant'g Specs 16.7 3.3 $704 $2,257
95%Cost Opinion 10.0 10.0 $595 $1,908
95%Team/Art Mt s/Coord• 33.3 3.3 $1,336 $4,283
95%Review Mtgs City/Others 10.0 $379 $1,216
100%Hardscape/Plamrg Drwgi 50.0 8.0 8.0 $2,264 $7,256
100%Hardscape/Plant'g Spec! 16.7 3.3 $704 $2,257
100%Cost Opinion 10.0 5.0 $487 $1,562
100%Team/Art Mtgs/Coord• 33.3 $1,264 $4,053
100%Review Mtgs City/Others 10.0 $379 $1,216
SUBTOTALS 612.9 48.0 130.6 27,256 $87,356
3 Drafting by sheet,input belowTT
a 60%Hardscape/Plant'gDrwgs ry 72.4 8.0 8.0 $3,115 $9,985
b 60%Cost Opinion 14.5 10.9 $784 $2,514
c 60%Team/Art Mtgs/Coord• 54.3 5.4 $2,178 $6,982
d 60%Review Mtgs City/Others 10.9 $412 $1,321
e 90%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 72.4 8.0 8.0 $3,115 $9,985
f 90%Cost Opinion 14.5 10.9 $784 $2,514
2g 90%Team/Art Mtgs/Coord• 54.3 3.6 $2,139 $6,856
e h 90%Review Mtgs City/Others 10.9 $412 $1,321
oc i 95%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 54.3 8.0 8.0 $2,428 $7,783
95%Hardscape/Plant'g Specs 18.1 3.6 $765 $2,453
k 95%Cost Opinion 10.9 10.9 $647 $2,073
I 95%Team/Art Mt s/Coord• 36.2 3.6 $1,452 $4,654
m 95%Review Mtgs City/Others 10.9 $412 $1,321
n 100%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwg 54.3 8.0 8.0 $2,428 $7,783
0 100%Hardscape/Plant Spec, 18.1 3.6 $765 $2,453
100%Cost O inion 10.9 5.4 $530 $1,697
q100%Team/Art Mtgs/Coord• 36.2 $1,374 $4,404
r 100%Review Mtgs City/Others City/Others10.9 $412 $1,321
SUBTOTALS 224.4 16.0 32.3 24,156.0 $77,419
4 Drafting by sheet,input below .q; ��,� 77,.
White Settlement
3 a 30%Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs 54.2 8.0 $2,230 $7,146
b 30%Cost Estimate 8.0 8.0 $477 $1,527
e\°\°
_ c 30%Team Mtgs/Coord 40.0 8.0 $1,691 $5,421
M d 30%Review Mtgs City/Others 12.0 $456 $1,460
;r a Team/Art Mt s/Coord' 12.0 $456 $1,460
24.0 5,308.4 17,013.3
GRAND TOTALS 1128.4 64.0 278.9 $65,421 $209,673
11/12/2009,1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols,Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\fd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc6
Construct Services $21,380
By:DPS/CAJ No sheets
Chk'd:
Howe GAD Hows coot
Doewn"conbd
&OW.r 1 &Qk w v speck"I WN10
TukDavd P.Sch ChrstopheAb� Debby Mn Gree ISI
LJ /tIN YWpNM
Pbess M0. Tuft 527.46 $HOD S2i42
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 internal project kickoff mtg 2.0 $55 $176
;1Dr.afting
/review ectdata 2.0 $55 $176
ti G kickoff m w/C 2.0 $55 $176
stimates 60.0
Q $1,648 $5,281
SUBTOTALS 66.0 $1,812 AM
b sheet,in ut belowM Gstimates 24.0 $659 $2,112
m
m =
SUBTOTALS 240 $M $2112
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 Constuctability review 16.0 $672 $2,153
3 Final coat estimate 40.0
o � $1,098 $3,520
kV
SUBTOTALS 10.0 16.0 $1770 $5,474
g 1 Draftin9 by sheet,input below
2 2 Constructa_Ility review 16.0 $672 $2,153
3 Final cost estimate 40.0
$1,098 $3,520
S/ANTOTALS 40.0 16.0 $1,770 471
N _1 Draftingb sheet,input below 111:e-"�a�"!,l' .,,
2 Costestimatea 24.0 $659 $2,112
0
SUBTOTALS v
24.0
GRAHDTOTALS 194.0 320 56,671 521380
11/12/2009,1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols,Inc. C:1Documents and SettingsVfdM)esktop\TRV Bridges on Iaptoffee proposal\Proposal 10-30-0916chibit B-0 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc7
Johns Sons Reproduction Costs -TRV Central City Bridges
Cost per Set
Number
Phase DelCost Unit Subtotal of Sets Total Cost
Prelimimary Eval 11x17 existing plans and exhibits
Black and white $ 0.12 100 $ 12.00
Color $ 0.65 50 $ 32.50
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 47.88 15 $ 718.20
Informal review mtgs 11x17 presentation
Color $ 0.65 25 $ 16.25
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 19.63 10 $ 196.30
Laminated 36"x48"boards $ 125.00 0 $ - 1 $
CAC meeting 11 x1 7 presentation
Color $ 0.65 25 $ 16.25
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 19.63 10 $ 196.30
Laminated 36"x48"boards $ 125.00 4 $ 500.00 1 $ 500.00
Public meetings 11x17 report
Color $ 0.65 0 $ -
Laminated cover $ 11.00 0 $
Binding $ 3.38 0 $
$ - 40 $
11x17 presentation
Color $ 0.65 25 $ 16.25
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 19.63 10 $ 196.30
Laminated 36"x48"boards $ 125.00 5 $ 625.00 1 $ 625.00
Public notice postcards $ 0.09 10,000 $ 910.00 0 $
Miscellaneous $
11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 100 $ 12.00
Color $ 0.65 20 $ 13.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 28.38 0 E
Subtotal: $ 2,432.10
30%Henderson 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 150 $ 18.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 21.38 27 $ 577.26
Johns Sons Reproduction Costs -TRV Central City Bridges
Cost per Set
Number
Phase Deliverable Unit Cost Unit Subtotal of Sets Total Cost
60%Henderson 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 250 $ 30.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 33.38 15 $ 500.70
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 500 $ 60.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 63.38 15 $ 950.70
90%Henderson 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 330 $ 39.60
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 42.98 15 $ 644.70
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 1000 $ 120.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 123.38 15 $ 1,850.70
95%Henderson 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 340 $ 40.80
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 44.18 17 $ 751.06
11x17 mylar set
Mylar $ 1.50 250 $ 375.00
$ 375.00 1 $ 375.00
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 1000 $ 120.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 123.38 17 $ 2,097.46
100%Henderson 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 350 $ 42.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 45.38 20 $ 907.60
11x17 mylar set
Mylar $ 1.50 350 $ 525.00
$ 525.00 1 $ 525.00
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 1000 $ 120.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 123.38 20 $ 2,467.60
Miscellaneous $ 1948
Public notice postcards $ 0.09 10,000 $ 910.00 1 $ 910.00
Subtotal $ 12,000.00
30%Main 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 200 $ 24.00
Binding $ 3.38 2 $ 6.76
$ 30.76 15 $ 461.40
60%Main 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 200 $ 24.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
Johns Sons Reproduction Costs -TRV Central City Bridges
Cost per Set
Number
Phase Deliverable Unit Cost Unit Subtotal of Sets Total Cost
$ 27.38 15 $ 410.70
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 500 $ 60.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 63.38 15 $ 950.70
90%Main 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 250 $ 30.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 33.38 15 $ 500.70
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 1000 $ 120.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 123.38 15 $ 1,850.70
95%Main 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 250 $ 30.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 33.38 15 $ 500.70
11x17 mylar set
Mylar $ 1.50 250 $ 375.00
$ 375.00 0 $ -
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 1000 $ 120.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 123.38 15 $ 1,850.70
100%Main 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 250 $ 30.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 33.38 16 $ 534.08
11x17 mylar set
Mylar $ 1.50 1 $ 1.50
$ 1.50 1 $ 1.50
Spec book
Black and white $ 0.12 1000 $ 120.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 123.38 16 $ 1,974.08
Miscellaneous $ 54.74
Public notice postcards $ 0.09 10,000 $ 910.00 1 $ 910.00
Subtotal $ 10,000.00
30%WS 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 300 $ 36.00
Binding $ 3.38 2 $ 6.76
$ 42.76 23 $ 1,000.00
GRAND TOTAL $ 26,009.36
Exhibit"B-5" -Construction Phase Task and Hour Breakdown
Client: City of Fort Worth
Project: TRV Bridges-Construction
City Project No.: 00144
FNI Project Manager. JFD
Project Phase
Discipline TOTAL FEE Percent
Ph 5:CA Henderson of Total
❑� 100% ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Project M mt $15,732 $15,732 14.9%
Transportationllnf $17,454 $17,454 16.6%
Structural $50,311 $50,311 47.8%
Storm Water/Utilities $2,357 $2,357 2.2%
hrl ation $950
$950 0.9%
Landscape Arch $3,367 $3,367 3.2%
No Group Selected
Subconsultants $13,650 $13,650 13.0%
Expenses $1,429
$1,429 1.4
TOTALS $105,250
$105,250 100.0%
C:\Documents and SettingsVfdlDesktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposaMroposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Su nwy
Freese and Nichols.Inc. ,,,,.,,.,,,— —
a o y�
a
T m Qo
3 w N
of°�
O o
3 N
C
3
0
Y
G y
� S
a
w
2 m c
O m
or m
E
m E
m
w
N O N N N tyD (aj
O
U ui v a ri
00
C J fn
w m
Q 3 a
a s o x
o 00 o w
g vi v v ni o
3w ww » o
0
O 0
{O Y d
3 M 3 a
T �
N 0
O
U V O
a
m
LL
m
20 3 c
0
sY N 0
C o 3
3 A m
F-
0 0
3 Y
d
O
O H
Z �
4 N U, M N N 0-
10 V O
C
L. A f9 N R t0
O
N
a
Z U .,S N N C O
V �
fA N
vi
d y N y Y O 0 0 O
d a u> o o v>
f a v N voi O �b C � n uNi v v e°i
2 Et q V y 3 ,fn vi f9 w
u y
s o'21 `2 2�°1.
3 o u o 0 o O
w aw waa m w m -`-tt.c°
0 EI0 `2
d
o0 C �
ou�o�000000o O om000 ~ N wvi or�onoo�ONoo 0 or�000 3 C
V viu�acvivinorovivi o aOcooci O as -j
fA N O fA f9 N N fA 10 Q
N to b9 fA N9 fA fA k b ti
j.n .n .9 y U
C
a
c
a °
m �
m �
j N N
E .�. $ c
E ° y t o c
u o t
° .c m E Z e c Y vi
y = n N ° C n r x `m m rn c� C9 .y. 0 9 0 2 C a m N m d U o
G!
Al
c 310 u m c log c
N d o p T O n m O r N O O L Q°'w „�, 7 >_w!a N 7 1�O i07 0 0 m U
C mU�mvJItL) L) LL a�U3O j viUQmrn�EQUUKO
d y c
71-1— N N
U �
SIs03 BuI�uud sssoo paufap-iasn va dwo (4) LL
is
Project Mgmt $15,732
By: JFD 40 sheets
Chk'd:
Hours CAD Hours Cost
Cadd Application
Gmup Manager Engineer Ii Analyst with
Task John F.Dewar Alex Ivan Gallia Word Processor David J.Thomp IV Raw Multiplier
Phase No. Task Description $66.81 $32.60 $20.00 $36.94
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 Advertise
3 Assemble bid pk
4 Pre-bid meeting
C
5 Addenda-one 8.08.0 $795 $2,939
` 6 Bid opening
7 Award
m 8 Pre-con mt
= 9 RFis-23 total 12.0 16.0 $1,323 $4,891
Q 10 Submittals 12.0
$802 $2,963
V 11 4 site visits or meetin s 20.0 $1,336 $4,939
12 Punchlist
13 Record dw s
14 Attend 5 TRVA meetings
SUBTOTALS 52.0 24.0 $4,257 $15,732
##k##k Advertise
#Assemble bid pk
##k##k Pre-bid meeting
######Addenda
##k##k Bid opening
#Award
# ##Pre wn mt
#RFis
#1J####Submittals
##k##k Site visits/mtgs
##Punchlist
#tkk###Record dw s
######Aftend 5 TRVA meetigns
SUBTOTALS
SUBTOTALS
GRAND TOTALS 52.0 24.0 $4,257 $15,732
C:\Documents and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dscl
Freese anrt Nichnlc Inc
Transportation/Inf $17,454
By: MAM
Chk'd: No sheets
Hours CAD Hours Cost
Engineer Engineer li Technician lv with
Task Christopher Bryan[l] Daniel Carlfnn C.(;;] Stephen I Sasser Raw Multiplier
Phase No. Task Description $47.20 $26.35 ALJ ,$30.74
1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 _ Respond to 10 RFls 8.0 16.0 $831 $3,072
V N 3 Shop drawing review 17.6 64.0 $2,644 $9,773
m 4 6 field visits and final punch list
c5 Pre-bid and pre-con meeting
tL = 6 Record drawin s
7 Addendum 1 12.0 24.0 $1,247 $4,608
SUBTOTALS 37.6 104.0
$4,722 $17,454
t
Respond to 20 RFls
######Shop drawing review
##lk###4 field visits and final punch list
tlN####Pre-bid and pre-con meeting
######Record drawings
SUBTOTALS
SUBTOTALS
GRAND TOTALS 37.6 104.0 $4,722 $17,454
C:\Documents and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc2
Freese and Nichols.Inr._ _ _
Structural $50,311
By VBK No shaels
ChKd
cow
Enpk—V EVk—1 E.0—Vl Ewh—w T.1i"il rrN
T fMm Keu llom Antmb dex Betl eesq ]JIe A WN[mR ftw
rMee Me. Tnsa $41.09 1 U&73 M07
utas Sd]s1
1 Dmfbng by sheet,input below %LM
2R 1010 RFIs 10.0 20.0 5888 53,642
Q C 3 dn,- review 180.0 160.0 18.0 512,068 544,605
U$ 4 2 SU visits 8.0 8.0 $5591 $2,064
yj 5Prs-bid aM stnrcbon m"Un
t C 6 Record dr for mtainin walla
tl= 7 Record drawings for Henderson Bridge
SVETOTJU 176.0 Mo 140
######Respond to 10 RFis
####Nl Bndge shop drawings review
8 field visits and final punch list
##N###PWbod and re-construcb on rnes6n
#kMlk1#Record drowi s for relaini wells
>r ###Record c1niwings for Henderson Bridge
ITOTALS
GRAND TOTALS 176.0 fall a 16.0 $13,612 S50 J11
11/1212009,2:00 PM
Freese and Nichols,Inc. C:1Documents and SettingsNfdrDesktoplTRV Bridges on IaptopTee pmftP
posaroposal I&M- \Exhlbil B-5 CA fee summary re
and bakdown l 10-30.09,Dsc3
Storm Water/Utilities $2,357
By: SKH No sheets
Chk'd: KDD
How* CAD Hows cost
Engl—V Enp6iesr li Enoaer I Ted.*in it WNh
T"k LK.I�M.r.Di 1.
71 Oswald ----EI I- RMOOWW
.
Ph&" No, Task Dowrotion $48.32 $31.39 $27.15 $21.90
1 Drafting by sheet,input bel
2 RFIs-1 4.0 4.0
0 $319 $1,178
t
,a 3 Site visits
L;j 4 Submittals 4.0 4-0 $319 $1,178.
SUBTOTALS 8.0 8.0 $fM $Z357
RFIs
visits
SUBTOTALS
SUBIOTA
GRAND TOTALS 8.0 8.0 $638, $2,357
11/12/2009,2:00 PM
Freese and Nichols,IQ.\Documents and Settings\fd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc4
Irrigation $950
By: STV
Chk'd: No sheets
senforoesow --j5;.fw.I Hows CAD Hours cost wNh
T-kRwW Allufflplf-
M. HO. T"kDowdpBon $53,40 $42.85 $30.35
0 1 Drafting by sheet,input below
2 Site visits
3 Meetings
4 RF[s-1 6.0 —
$257 $950
SUBTOTALS 6.0
$257 $950
Site visits —
tF Meetings
RFIs
SUBTOTALS
T"TA
GRAND TOTALS 6.0
$257 $950
1/12/2009,2:00 PM
Freese and Nichols,lQ0ocuments and Settingsljfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown -10-30-09,DscS
Landscape Arch $3,367
By: DT
Chk'd: 22 sheets
Hours CAO Hours cost
Lendswpe Arehttect v Archltedurol Intern I AreNkcfurd Intern I With
Tsslr Dwight E.Taylor Jorge Max mitran Catherine Amelia Raw &OpNN
Pll s No. Task $37.96 $24.31 $21.61
Drafting by sheet,input below
a Pre-bid Conference
b Address Bidder RFI's/Addenda
p c Addenda
d Pre-Construction Conference
ry a Review Submittals 20.0 $759 $2,806
f Project Status Mtgs
Zg Const Site Visits
h Punch List/Walk Through
i RFI-1 4.0 $152 $561
Vh
t
a
SUBTOTALS 24.0 Ss11 S3,3e7
m
Pre-bid Conference
Address Bidder RFI's/Addenda
Addenda
Pre-Construction Conference
Review Submittals
Project Status Mtgs
Const Site Visits
Punch List/Walk Through
_ SUBPOTALS mm
SIMTOTALS
GRAND TOTALS 24.0 $911 $3,367
11/12/2009,2:00 PM
Freese and Nichols,IMDocuments and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposallProposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,Dsc6
Consulting Contract Schedule Specifications FORT WORTH
City of Fort Worth Capital Improvement Program
Dept.:PMO Subject:Schedule Specifications Version:1.0 1 Effective Date:June 30,2009
Attachment D-Project Schedule
This PROTECT requires a Tier 3 schedule as defined herein and in the City's Schedule Guidance
Document.
D1. CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT: The CONSULTANT shall
prepare schedules for consulting services that meet the requirements described in this
specification, showing by Critical Path Method (CPM) the planned sequence and timing of
the Work associated with the Agreement. All submittals shall be submitted in PDF format,
and schedule files shall also be submitted in native file format (i.e. file formats associated
with the scheduling software). The approved scheduling software systems for creating the
schedule files are:
- Primavera (Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY)
- Primavera Contractor(Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY)
- Primavera SureTrak(Version 3.x or later or approved by CITY)
- Microsoft Project(Version 2003/2007 or later or approved by CITY)
D2. BASELINE CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: Following notice-to-proceed, the
CONSULTANT shall develop, submit and review the draft detailed baseline consulting
services schedule with the CITY to demonstrate the CONSULTANT's understanding of the
Agreement requirements and approach for performing the work. The CONSULTANT will
prepare the final detailed baseline consulting services schedule based on CITY comments, if
any, and submit to the CITY no later than the submittal of the first project invoice.
The following guidelines shall be adhered to in preparing the baseline schedule, and as
described in further detail in the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document.
a. The scope shall be subdivided by work breakdown structure (WBS) representing the
tasks,subtasks,and activities associated with delivering the work.
b. The schedule shall accurately describe the major work activities,key milestones, and
dependencies/relationships as appropriate to the work.
c. The schedule should include appropriate meetings, review periods, critical decision
points,including third party utility dependencies and reviewing agencies.
D3. PROGRESS CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: The CONSULTANT shall prepare
and submit monthly to the CITY for approval the updated schedule in accordance with D1
and D2 and the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document inclusive. As the Work progresses,
the CONSULTANT shall enter into the schedule and record actual progress as described in
the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document.
The updated schedule submittal shall also include a concise schedule narrative that
highlights the following, if appropriate and applicable:
• Changes in the critical path,
• Expected schedule changes,
• Potential delays,
CITY OF FORT WORTH,TEXAS 1 OF 2
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE
• Opportunities to expedite the schedule,
• Coordination issues the CITY should be aware of or can assist with,
• Other schedule-related issues that the CONSULTANT wishes to communicate to the
CITY.
D4. PERFORMANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: If the work
accomplished falls behind that scheduled due to factors within the CONSULTANT's
control, the CONSULTANT shall take such action as necessary to improve the progress of
the Work. In addition, the CITY may require the CONSULTANT to submit a revised
schedule demonstrating the proposed plan to make up the delay in schedule progress and
to ensure completion of the Work within the allotted Agreement time.
D5. SCHEDULE TIERS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS•
The requirements for the schedule are determined based on the nature and needs of the
project. The schedule tier for this project is stated at the top of this document.
CONSULTANT shall submit each schedule relying on the CITY's current Schedule
Guidance Document.
D6. SCHEDULE SUBMITTAL AND PAYMENT:
As stated in III.A.(1). of the Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide the information
required by Attachment D. CONSULTANT's monthly invoices will not be accepted and
processed for payment without monthly schedule updates that are submitted in the time
and manner required by Attachment D and the CITY's current Schedule Guidance
Document.
CITY OF FORT WORTH,TEXAS 2 OF 2
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE
ATTACHMENT "E"
LOCATION
BridgesTrinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street
Bridgeand 30% Design of White Settlement
City Project . 00144
- � �� North ��► ���4�- � �. '��� � � -
Main = � � • � � �.
Future TRV
Central City
Henderson ,.- � ; Development � :':
dn•
Downtown Fort Worth �����
M&C Review Page 1 of 2
Official site of the City of Fort Worth,Texas
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FO T11i
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 12/15/2009
DATE: 12/15/2009 REFERENCE NO.: C-24004 LOG NAME: 20TRVBRIDGES
CODE: C TYPE: NOW PUBLIC CONSENT HEARING: NO
SUBJECT: Authorize an Engineering Services Agreement with Freese and Nichols, Inc., in the Amount
of$3,764,201.00 as Part of the Trinity River Vision Central City Project for Evaluation and
Final Design of Bridges at North Main Street and Henderson Street and Thirty Percent
Final Design of the White Settlement Road Bridge
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an Engineering
Services Agreement in the amount of$3,764,201.00 as part of the Trinity River Vision Central City
Project for evaluation and final design of bridges at North Main Street and Henderson Street and
thirty percent final design of the White Settlement Road bridge.
DISCUSSION:
The United States Army Corps of Engineers has identified the Fort Worth Central City area as "at-
risk" due to an aging levee system constructed in the 1950's and 1960s. In 2003, the City Council
adopted the Trinity River Master Plan, which included the construction of a bypass channel as its
preferred method of urban flood control.
The 2004 and 2008 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) included $14,733,000.00 for bridge and
street improvements and related infrastructure as part of the Trinity River Vision Central City Project.
The services to be performed under this Engineering Services Agreement (Agreement) consist of
evaluating the designs prepared in the schematic phase and preparing preliminary designs and cost
estimates for bridges over the future bypass channel at North Main Street, Henderson Street and
White Settlement Road that will allow access into Central City Fort Worth. Public participation will be
vital in selecting the preliminary design of the bridges at North Main Street, Henderson Street and
White Settlement Road. Ongoing communication and outreach will be an important part of the public
participation for this project.
Once this preliminary phase of the project is complete, final design of Henderson Street and North
Main Street bridges will be completed. White Settlement Road bridge plans will only be carried to a
30 percent level at this time which define the bridge type for the Texas Department of Transportation
(TXDOT). The construction of White Settlement Road is not scheduled until 2014 so the final design
will be completed on the current program schedule in January 2013. Construction of Henderson
Street bridge is scheduled to begin in spring 2011. North Main Street construction is scheduled to
begin in winter 2013. These bridges will be constructed in partnership with TXDOT who is anticipated
to provide a significant amount of bridge funding.
The scope of this Agreement includes the evaluation of the design of the three bridges in keeping with
the current budgets for this project, presentation of the design that will be carried to final design for all
three bridges, the final bridge design for Henderson Street and North Main Street and 30 percent
design for White Settlement Road. The consultant will also provide construction administration for the
Henderson Street bridge. Freese and Nichols, Inc., has proposed to complete this phase of design for
a lump sum amount of$3,658,951.00 and the construction phase administration will be on a time and
expense basis with a not-to-exceed limit of$105,250.00. City staff considers this fee to be fair and
reasonable for the scope of services to be performed.
http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?I D=11704&counci ldate=12/15/2009 12/15/2009
M&C Review Page 2 of 2
Freese and Nichols, Inc., is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance by committing to 30
percent MWBE participation. The City's goal on this project is 30 percent which exceeds the minimum
goal of 25 percent for all Trinity River Vision Projects.
This project is located in COUNCIL DISTRICTS 2 and 9, Mapsco 62U, 62Y and 62Q and will benefit
the entire City.
FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION:
The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current capital
budgets, as appropriated, of the Street Improvements Fund and the Street Improvements 2008 Fund.
TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers
C200 531200 209260014430 $2,200,000.00
C204 531200 209260014430 $1.458.951.00
C204 531200 209260014480 $105.250.00
Submitted for City Manager's Office by. Fernando Costa (6122)
William Verkest (7801)
Originating Department Head: Randle Harwood (6101)
Additional Information Contact: Mark Rauscher (2446)
Patrick Buckley (2443)
ATTACHMENTS
6 Attachment E.pdf
http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=11704&counci ldate=12/15/2009 12/15/2009
LETTER
OF
TRANSMITTAL UNMFREESE
4055 International Plaza,Suite 200 • Fort Worth,Texas 76109 • 817-735-7300 • fax 817-735-7491
PROJECT: TRV Bridges-City Project 00144 DATE: 12/15/09
TO: Pat Buckley,P.E.
ADDRESS: City Hall
1000 Throckmorton St.
Fort Worth,TX 76102-6311
BY: John Dewar,P.E.
CC:
PHONE NO.: 817-392-2443
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
FV- ATTACHED r UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA:
r Delivery Service and Tracldng No.
r Hand Delivery r Email f Other
• Signed Agreement for Engineering Services: Trinity River Vision Central City-Final Design of
Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges and 30%Design of White Settlement Bridge-
City Project No. 00144(5 copies)
THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR:
r USE r REVIEW AND COMMENT r INFORMATION
r APPROVAL DISTRIBUTION TO PARTIES r RESPONSE
r RECORDS r OTHER:
REMARKS:
Pat,
These signed agreements are ready for final execution.
Thanks
s,�
Joh
II
l