Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010/03/23-Agenda-Crime Control and Prevention District (CCPD) r FORT WORTH AGENDA FORT WORTH CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT BOARD PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBER 1000 THROCKMORTON STREET FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 TUESDAY, MARCH 23,2010 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE 10 A.M. CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mike Moncrief,President Carter Burdette,Director Jungus Jordan,Director Zim Zimmerman,Vice-President Sal Espino,Director Frank Moss,Director Joel Burns,Director Kathleen Hicks,Director Danny Scarth,Director Staff Liaison-Tom Higgins,Assistant City Manager I. Call to Order II. Swearing in of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District Board in. Legal Overview of the Board's Duties and Responsibilities IV. Election of Officers A. President B. Vice-President V. Appointment and Swearing in of Secretary VI. Approval of Minutes from the November 12, 2009 and December 17,2009 Meetings VII. Written Reports A. First Quarter Program Report FY 2009-2010 B. First Quarter Financial Report FY 2009-2010 VIII. Staff Reports A. Presentation on Community Based Programs-Sasha Kane, Senior Contract Compliance Specialist B. Revised FY 2010 Crime Control and Prevention District Board Calendar— Executive Deputy Chief Rhonda Robertson C. CCPD Citizen Appreciation Day-May 15`b- Executive Deputy Chief Robertson IX. Discussion Item: Review of Budget Shortfalls and Current Financial Policy - Shallah Graham, Senior Administrative Services Manager X. Action Item: None XI. Citizen Comments XII. Future Agenda Items XIII. adjourn This tacility is wheelchair accessible. For accommodations or sign interpreti%e services, please call the pity Managers Office at 81 7 192-6143. 48 hours in advance. MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FORT WORTH CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT Special Meeting December 17, 2009 I. Call Meeting to Order The meeting of the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors was called to order at 6:00pm, in the City of Fort Worth Pre-Council Chamber by, David Vasquez, President. In attendance were board members: Erik Brown Torchy White Wendel Cass Brenda Silcox Carlos Flores James Russell Joseph De Leon Tommie Henton II. Consideration and Approval of a Mid-Year Budget Reduction Amendment to Reduce Funding for the Following Programs: Up to $200,000 from the Strategic Operations Fund, Up to $300,000 from Parks Community Policing, Up to $300,000 from Special Events Overtime, Up to $600,000 from Technology Infrastructure and Up to $238,914 Wl from the Helicopter Lease/Equipment Program 1. Staff Report Monique Lee briefed the Board on the FY 2010 revised revenue and the proposed mid-year reductions. The adopted revenue budget for FY 2010 was 50.8 million dollars. Revenue decreased by 7% or 3.3 million dollars which brings the adjusted revenue budget to 47.4 million dollars. The proposed mid-year reductions total 1.6 million dollars. The reduction in the Strategic Operations Fund will come from allocated overtime funds. Resources will have to be reallocated or activities will have to be reduced. The reduction in the Parks Community Policing Program will come from allocated overtime and security contract funds. This will reduce community center security, pool security, youth and sports security, special events security and the contract for security at the Botanic Garden. The reduction from Special Events Overtime will come from allocated overtime funds. This will mean a reallocation of resources and possibly reducing the number of activities. The reduction in Technology Infrastructure will come from replacements. Replacing equipment (computers, etc) will be put on hold. The recommended reduction in Technology Infrastructure will not deplete the entire fund. The reduction in the Helicopter Lease Program will come from not purchasing a new helicopter. Helicopter lease will be put on hold until the heliport options are completed. '� 1 Mr. Brown asked if the technology was in the office environment or the , equipment in the police vehicles. Ms. Lee responded it was office environment only. Ms. Lee stated the recommendation is to approve the FY 2010 mid-year budget reduction amendment to reduce funding up to $300,000 each for the Strategic Operations, Park Community Policing, Special Events Overtime Fund, and up to $600,000 from the Technology Infrastructure and up to $128,914 from the Helicopter Leasing Program. Mr. De Leon asked if someone could explain how the money from the Strategic Operation Fund is spent. Ms. Lee responded the types of the activities the officers are involved in that are funded by the Strategic Operations Fund are auto theft programs, bait car program, sexual assault operations, narcotic operations, robberies of the elderly crimes, day time residential burglary operations, surveillance details, sexual offender identification, burglary of motor vehicle operations, increase patrol in retail areas, truancy enforcement, and summer strategies initiative. The fund covers emerging crime trend that comes up. Ms. White asked how the crimes are classified. Mr. De Leon stated these are part I crimes. Ms. White asked if these are the assault, burglaries, etc. that require these special units to form to deal with the overtime costs for these emerging crime ,. trends. Deputy Chief Reed added the fund addresses part I crimes such as burglaries, robberies, homicides, rapes, and thefts. It is usually a grass root effort from patrol officers who notice a trend in their area and request the assistance. Approval is fast and a detail can be put together in 24 hours to begin addressing the problem. Ms. White asked if the funds are spread between the five divisions. Deputy Chief Read responded the fund covers the five patrol divisions, narcotics and vice. Ms. White expressed a concern about reducing the money to cover these operations and leaving the citizens unprotected. Mr. Flores stated the cuts recommended by Ms. Lee represent a percentage reflective of the decline in tax revenue. He asked Ms. Lee what decline she used in constructing the recommendation. Ms. Lee responded 7% as of the beginning of FY 2010. Mr. Flores asked if Ms. Lee was familiar with the numbers reported on the state comptroller's website for tax revenue comparison. Ms. Lee replied yes. Mr. Flores asked what kind of decline in tax revenue trends the comptroller's website indicates. Ms. Lee stated is it not an accurate comparison for projecting what Fort Worth's sales tax revenue will be. She can only look at our sales tax revenue in comparison other years. This year is not like any other year and neither was last year. Mr. Flores stated he is trying to get another data point to indicate what tax revenues are doing. He asked if the data on the comptroller's website is trending a higher or lower decline than the 7% we are looking. Ms. Lee responded is 2 . it is trending a higher decline. The average is 9.9% decline just for the month of October. Our city trended 17% decline for the general fund and the CCPD fund was 14% decline. Mrs. Silcox moved to freeze CCPD spending except for what staff has already recommended. Mr. Vasquez asked her to hold her motion until after the public hearing. Mr. De Leon asked why the helicopter lease payment was different from the $600,000 we usually pay. Ms. Lee responded the Helicopter Lease area was reduced during the recent budget preparation because we did not have a prospect of having a heliport at that time. It was initially reduced by$300,000 to $400,000 and then reduced is more. The remainder is the $128,914 recommended for reduction today. Mr. Cass asked why we spend 4 million dollars on school security, and what exactly Park Community Policing is. Ms. Lee responded we actually spend 6 million dollars on school security and the 4 million dollars is the revenue we receive. The amount actually spent is 2 million dollars. Melody Mitchell explained the Park Community Policing funding covers police officer security at late night programs at Worth Heights, Como, MLK, Sycamore, and Northside community centers. There is also security at all the swimming pools but all the pools will be closed this summer except for Forest Park and there will be a savings there. There is also funding for officer security at youth sports events and for adult sports events for crowd control. The fund also supplies money for the Botanic Garden private security in the parking lots. Mr. De Leon stated cutting the Strategic Operation Fund will have some serious consequences. He feels it is a core program for the police department. Mr. Brown asked staff to speak to why these programs were recommended for cuts and what they plan to do without the funds. Chief Halstead stated there are some programs that are untouchable so staff looked at the softest dollars that can still give to the financial goal. This may be only the first adjustment made if revenue trends do improve. The cuts in the programs recommended will impact crime and the ability to saturate some of these problem areas. However the department is ready to "do more with less" mission because we understand the challenges. Chief Halstead added he would realign resources to meet the community's expectations. We are going to have to get creative due to funds being so tight this year. Ms. Lee added the money will not be divided evenly across all seven divisions. The money will be divides based on crime trends and historical spending. Ms. Lee discussed the make up of the CCPD budget and explained how much is in contractual services, salary costs, supplies, etc. to see 3 there is not much room to manipulate funds. Ms. White had concerns that the money would not distributed equally. She fears that the east side will not receive a fair amount. There is a large number of Part I crime in her area and where the funds and protection is needed. Ms. Lee responded the division of funds would actually help the east side because that is the area where we experience the most emerging crime trends in the past. Ms. White stated it would not be fair to the other divisions to leave them without funds. Ms. Lee responded the funds should go to the areas with the most emerging crime trends rather than return the money to fund balance from those areas without the need. Mr. Flores stated he is reluctant to make cuts in anything that gets to the core of what the CCPD is here for and what the police department is entrusted to do for the citizens of Fort Worth. Strategic Operations and Parks Community Police are two large components of that. Mr. Flores also stated it will only get worse if some cuts are not made now. Mr. Flores feels if we begin taking some soft cuts now in the end it will be better than larger, painful cuts later. The Board should not make fundamental cuts that seem contrary to the CCPD. 2. Public Hearing Mr. Vasquez opened the public hearing. There were no speakers. Mr. Vasquez asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Mr. Russell moved to close the .. public hearing. Mr. Cass seconded. All approved. Motion passed. 3. Action Mr. Vasquez discussed the action before the Board. He agreed that there will be more cuts to the budget. There will be harder decisions to make after the December sales tax figures are released. Mr. De Leon stated by January the Chief will submit his five-year plan and he is anxiously awaiting that information. Chief Halstead stated his goal is February 2 and is on the Council agenda. Mr. Vasquez added the dollar figures could be increased with the new budget in October 1, 2010 and the Board could eliminate some of the hard dollars figures. Chief Halstead no crime trend throughout the city will be ignored. The police Department will have to strategize resources more efficiently. Ms. Lee stated the 1.6 million dollar cut recommended represents half of the 7% cut we need to make. Mr. De Leon stated his concern is that the percentage will keep going up and we need to look at making a larger percentage cut. Ms. Henton stated she has the same concerns. She feels the recommendation should be as high as 10%. Mrs. Silcox moved to freeze all current spending and have staff return with Recommendations for deeper cuts after the December sales tax figures are released. Ms. Lee asked what Mrs. Silcox what she meant by"freeze"all spending. Mrs. Silcox responded the Board would pay contractual agreements And salaries but other spending should be frozen until the Board receives a better picture of where staff can make cuts to the budget. Mr. Cass stated he agreed. Mr. Vasquez was concerned that any money used for Strategic Operations would not Be able to be spent under this recommendation. If we have a situation that required Strategic Operations Funds staff would not be able to utilize those funds. Mrs. Silcox stated except for those cuts that are recommended, everything else should be frozen. Mr. De Leon asked if Mrs. Silcox wanted to proceed with the funding cuts as proposed and all other programs and funds, except contractual, and would be frozen until the Board receives the new tax figures. Also that no new requests for spending would be presented to the Board. Mrs. Silcox responded he was correct. Mr. De Leon seconded the motion. Mr. Brown asked if that no more spending at all unless it's contractual or salaries. Mrs. Silcox stated she meant no more spending or requests for spending at all until the Board receives the January figures. Mr. Brown asked if Strategic Operations and Parks Community Policing falls into that category and CCPD cannot pay anything out of those funds if Mrs. Silcox's motion is passed. Deputy Chief Robertson pointed out those on-going recruiting efforts and several things that come out of these funds. If the Board freezes all spending except for contractual and salaries the police department will have a difficult time operating. Mrs. Silcox pointed out that at the last meeting on November 12, 2009, information presented on the revenue projections and budget update, gave the Board three options to adjust the budget. The Board could use fund balance to cover all or part of the deficit, wait until the first quarter Board meeting to asses sales tax revenue and at that time take action, or freeze spending. Ms. Lee explained that the recommendation was based on recommendations presented at that meeting and the Board could freeze the reductions presented rather than act. The Board could freeze or table the item until the first quarter figures are available. Ms. Lee stated we can't just freeze all operations. Mr. Brown stated we don't have enough information to pass a motion because we don't know the impact. 5 Mr. Vasquez stated he opposes the motion because if the Board approves the budget cuts and freezes spending the remaining funds would not be able to be utilized. It would any further use of the Strategic Operations money. The Board would be tying the hands of the police department. Mr. Brown agreed but stated the Board would meet again within 60 days to take further action. Mr. Flores stated more adjustments will be needed. There is a sense of urgency to do something. Mr. Vazquez called for questions on the motion on the floor. Mr. De Leon stated The Board needs more clarification on how a spending freeze would affect the police department. Chief Halstead stated it would be helpful if staff could Have a clear definition of what the phrase "freeze spending" means and asked Ms. Lee to explain. Ms. Lee stated the reductions presented requested the board to either act Immediately, utilize fund balance or wait until the first quarter meeting after The tax figures are available and have staff freeze the funds or a portion just for those program areas recommended. Mr. Vasquez asked if she recommended Freezing only the programs recommended at this time. Ms. Lee replied it was. The funds would not be spent while the Board is considering their options. If the Board doesn't freeze some of those funds, there is the risk that the money will be spent while the Board is considering. Mr. De Leon asked what her intent was by"freezing"the funds. Mrs. Silcox stated she was suggesting freezing the staff recommended budget cuts and have staff return with more detailed cuts in February. Mr. De Leon asked if it meant "don't do anything with the money". Ms. White asked if it meant Strategic Operations would not be able to operate. Ms. Lee replied it doesn't mean that. It means that $300,000 from the Strategic Operations Fund would set aside and not be utilized but there are still funds left to utilize. Mr. Brown asked if instead of cutting the budget, $300,000 would be set aside and not spent until the Board gets the actual numbers. Then they can make a budget decision. Ms. Lee stated that was correct. Mrs. Silcox replied that was also her intent when she made the motion. Mr. Vasquez clarified the motion is to freeze the specific amounts recommended For cuts; the $300,000 in Strategic Operations, $300,000 in Parks Community Policing, 5300,000 in Special Events Overtimes, $600,000 in Technology and Infrastructure and $238,914 in Helicopter Lease Program. Mr. Vasquez asked for a second to the motion on the floor. Mr. Cass seconded. 6 Charlene Sanders stated that the original motion made, instead of being a Recommendation to reduce the budget by the specific amount at this time, the Board is recommending not to spend the money for now. Mr. Vasquez replied Chief Halstead recommends the word "isolate"be used instead of"freeze". Mrs. Silcox asked if she needed to restate the motion on the floor. Ms. Sanders Replied Mrs. Silcox made a motion and Mr. Cass seconded it. There was Discussion and Mr. Vasquez restated, Mrs. Silcox agreed that the restatement was her understanding of the motion she made and was seconded. Ms. Sanders stated the Board is now ready to take action on the motion. Mr. Vasquez stated there is a motion on the floor, a call for a question has been Made and he polled the board for their vote. Mr. Flores, yes Mr. De Leon, yes as explained Mr. Cass, yes as explained Ms. Henton, yes Ms. White, yes reluctantly Mr. Brown, yes Mr. Russell, yes Mrs. Silcox, yes Mr. Vasquez, yes. Motion passed. III. Discussion of CCPD Budget Breakdown for Future Reduction Consideration Ms. Lee presented information on the background of the sales tax revenue and a breakdown of the budget. The expenditure budget for FY 2010 is 50.6 million dollars. Eighty-six percent of the budget is contractual and salary costs, seven percent is supply cost, and seven percent is Capital equipment. The Violent Crimes and Gangs initiative expenditure budget is ninety-five percent contractual services and salary cost and five percent supply cost. The Neighborhood Crime initiative expenditure budget is ninety-six percent contractual and salary costs, and four percent supply costs. The School Safety and Youth initiative expenditure budget is ninety-six percent contractual and salary costs, and four percent supply costs. The Police Enhancements initiative expenditure budget is seventy-three contractual and salary costs, sixteen percent capital equipment and eleven percent supply costs. The sales tax revenue since 2006 has declined from 9% to a projected -5% in 2010. The adopted budget for 2010 was 45.6 million dollars but due to the decline in projected sales tax the budget has been reduced to 42.2 million dollars. The adjusted budget for FY 2010 is 47.4 million 7 dollars. This consists of adjusted sales tax figures of 42.2 million dollars, School security revenue of 4 million dollars, miscellaneous revenue of$103,902 and interest revenue of $989,251 bringing the total adjusted budget to $47,416,697. This is a$3,399,386 decrease from the adopted 2010 budget. Current expenditures are set at 50.6 million dollars and when you add in $229,950 for health and retirement costs, less the pending FY 2010 reduction of 1.6 million dollars, the projected FY 2010 expenditures are 49.2 million dollars. The projected deficit is 1.8 million dollars. This is the amount the CCPD Board has to cover. Ms. Lee proposed some potential reduction options to make up the $1,811,264 deficit. The options are: reduce the Police Cadet program from $102,008 to $890,926 by holding off on the program until the next fiscal year. Reduce vehicle replacement from $4,614,171 to $1,500,000 by only replacing vehicles in the areas we have already committed to replace and reduce the number of vehicles purchased from 101 to 21. Reduce the Stockyard Detail from $102,574 to $50,000. Reduce the NPD Overtime from $901,826 to $243,616. Reduce the election cost due to some savings in that area from $489,799 to $258,000. Reduce Recruit Officer Training from $2,162,519 to $339,000 due to a savings in this program. This is a total reduction of$2,471,543. Ms. Lee stated the next step after addressing the proposed options to address the immediate deficit is looking at contractual services and positions. The recommendation to the Board is to make immediate reductions to adjust the budget, use fund balance to cover all or part of the deficit, wait until the first quarter Board meeting to assess sales tax revenue and take action at that time, freeze spending, or reevaluate contractual obligations. Mr. Vasquez stated he would like to see the expiration dates of our contractual obligations. Ms. , Lee stated that information is in the packet the Board received. Mr. Brown asked if there was anything in the contracts that would give us a release in case of budget case. Ms. Lee responded there was. Mr. Brown asked if the civilian positions in the Neighborhood Policing Districts were fully funded and could there be some savings in that area. Ms. Lee replied she would need to look at the vacancies and added the dollar amount include more than salaries and benefits. Mrs. Silcox asked if the furlough money from the civilian comes back into the CCPD fund and if it was figured into the figures presented. Ms. Lee responded furlough money does return to the CCPD fund and the figures presented does not include these funds because the CCPD budget was adopted before the general fund budget. She added there could be some savings in that area. Mr. De Leon asked if the Board could make a motion to address the reduction options at this meeting. Mr. Vasquez responded no. Ms. Lee stated this meeting is just to present options to the Board. Mr. Vasquez stated these cuts need to go before City Council and return to the Board before they can vote on them. Ms. Sanders stated these items are for discussion only and no action can be taken at this time. The purpose of the discussion is for staff to brief the Board and give the Board an opportunity for feed back and discussion to give staff direction on the cuts to the budget. ,%lr. Brown asked for a breakdown of any open positions that have not been filled but our 8 � AEft budgeted by CCPD so that if the Board decides not to fill the positions, what the savings would be. Ms. Lee stated she could. Mr. De Leon stated he studied the breakdown information in the packet and is prepared to proceed with the action required. He is in agreement with the proposed cuts and would like to get the process started. Ms. White asked if the Board could discuss the executive summary included in the packet. Ms. White is also interested in the grants. She wanted to know if the department has applied for the grants and can some of the deficit be offset by incoming grant money. Ms. White wanted to know if the department has applied for grants, when they applied, when the deadlines are, and what we can expect to come in from grant funds. Mr. Cass asked about the 25 million dollars the police department was supposed to receive for Homeland Security. Chief Halstead replied the police department did not receive that level of funding. Mr. Flores asked about the FY 2010 Revised Revenue information. He asked if the projected deficit of$1,811,264.39 included the savings from the election. Ms. Lee stated it does not. Mr. Flores pointed out that the projected deficit would be less than the figure listed. Ms. Lee stated the Board has yet to vote to include the election cost reduction. Mr. Flores asked if the cost for Civil Service Pay Plan has historically stayed the same. Ms. Lee replied yes. Mr. Flores asked how many years were left on the contract with the Mansfield Jail. Ms. Lee replied 10 years. Mr. WUF Flores stated the jail costs were increased four years ago and capped by the sitting Board. Ms. Lee agreed and stated the sitting Board requested the cap at 4 million dollars. Ms. Flores asked if there was a penalty for changing or cancelling the jail contract. Ms. Lee responded we have to provide the required notice of cancellation but there is no penalty. Mr. Flores asked if that contract was cancelled what kind of function deficits would result. Chief Halstead stated if that occurred, all the funds from the jail contract costs will roll over to the general fund. Mr. De Leon asked if anyone considered revisiting with the County Commissioners for jail service or would that create issues we would not want to address. Chief Halstead responded we have not but jail contract was very sensitive and challenging and the City might be hesitant to approach the County at this point. Mr. De Leon stated with the new staff we have we might get a new approach and save some money. Chief Halstead suggested the legal staff present an overview to the Board. Ms. Henton wanted to know where we stand on the Taser program and will the Board be buying more tasers. Chief Halstead responded a presentation on the taser program will be provided at the next Board meeting and the program is an on-going purchasing program for officer's equipment. Mr. Brown asked if the MDC cost was for replacement of older equipment or purchase of new equipment. Ms. Lee responded it is maintenance. Mr. Brown agreed with Ms. White and 9 suggested the Board go through the summary. Mrs. Silcox recommended the Board use the Executive Summary that was in the mailed out packet to discuss their suggestions for budget cuts. Ms. White stated it is the consensus of the Board that they want to make sure that they are acting in the best interests of the citizens and they receive feedback from the community and that has to be a consideration. She agreed the Board should go through the summary line by line. Mr. De Leon reminded the Board that even though they can cut funding for programs it is ultimately the Chief's department and decision on the programs. Mr. Vasquez directed each Board member to state their suggestions for funding cuts. Ms. Henton recommended cuts in Crime Prevention Agency Partnership, Comin'Up sites, Storefronts, Crime Prevention Program, Safe Haven, Recruitment, Salaries,jail costs, Special Operations Division vehicles, Special Events Overtime. Ms. Henton has concerns about the High Mileage Vehicle Replacement program and the Taser Program. Ms. White agreed with many of Ms. Henton's concerns and added recommended cuts in the Stockyard Detail, Special Events Overtime, and Park Police. Ms. White recommended no cuts in Code Blue, Recruitment, Salary, and Strategic Operations. She would like more information on Safe Haven and a presentation on the High Mileage Vehicle Program. Mr. Brown recommended cuts in Crime Prevention Agency Partnership, Comin'Up, Safe Haven, jail costs, High Mileage Vehicle program, Cadet Program, and Special Events Overtime. He suggested a possible change in the High Mileage Vehicle Program to change the mileage guideline to 125 or 150 thousand miles versus just 100 thousand miles. Ms. White stated she would rather see funding cut from the Special Events Overtime before we make any cuts in Strategic Operations. Cutting money in this program would make it difficult for these police units to function. Mr. Russell recommended putting Zero Tolerance, Gang Unit, and Gang Graffiti together and making cuts in that area. He also recommended cuts in Stockyards Detail,jail costs and Special Events Overtime. He has some concerns about Safe Haven and needs more information on that and what they do with the youth in the afternoon. Ms. Lee explained to the Board that the funding for Special Events Overtime does not provide private security for the event. It does provide funding for crowd control for these events outside the perimeter of the event. Mr. Vasquez added the officers are important for perimeter control to also protect the citizens residing near these events. Chief Halstead stated the Special Events Ordinance will be presented to Council on January 12. This ordinance will assist the police department in the amount of staffing and reimbursement funding required for specific events that are for a"for profit" organizations. 10 ;: J Mrs. Silcox had some of the same concerns as the rest of the Board. She submitted her Gbm recommendations in writing (copy attached). Mrs. Silcox also had concerns about the High Mileage Vehicle program and recommended no cuts to that program. She stated the new vehicles should go to the patrol officers and some of the more recent new cars went to other units. The Board was told these new vehicle would go to front line patrol officers. She suggested a presentation on the program and where the new vehicles are assigned. Ms. Sanders reminded the Board that this issue was not a listed agenda item. Mr. Cass recommended cuts in the After School Program, Safe Haven, Comin'Up, Special Events Overtime and tasers. Mr. De Leon recommended reducing the number of positions in Zero Tolerance. and funding cuts in Crime Prevention Partnership, Comin'Up, Stockyards Detail, NPO Program, and NPD leases, Storefronts, Crime Prevention, After School Program and Special Operations Vehicles. Mr. De Leon recommended returning Salary to the general fund. Mr. Flores recommended cuts in Zero Tolerance positions, Strategic Operations Fund, Crime Prevention Agency Partnership, Comin'Up, Stockyards Detail, Storefronts, Cadets, Special Events Overtime, and Helicopter. Mr. Flores recommended further review and information in the NPO Program, NPD Districts, After School Program, Safe Haven, Crime Prevention, Stockyards Detail,jail costs, High Mileage Vehicles, and Special Operations Lease Vehicles. IV. Adjourn .�-' Mr. Vasquez asked for a motion to adjourn. Mr. De Leon moved to adjourn, Mr. Cass seconded. All approved. The meeting was adjourned at 8:40pm. Il �;y;�, �0 � ��