Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 51039 CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 0 CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a Texas home-rule municipality ("CITY"), and CDM Smith, Inc, authorized to do business in Texas, ("ENGINEER"), for a PROJECT generally described as: SCADA System Feasibility Assessment Project. Article I Scope of Services The Scope of Services is set forth in Attachment A. Article II Compensation and Term of Agreement A. The ENGINEER's compensation shall be in the amount up to $ 405,232.00 as set forth in Attachment B. B. Unless otherwise terminated pursuant to Article VI. D. herein, this Agreement shall be for a term beginning upon the effective date, as described below, and shall continue until the expiration of the funds or completion of the subject matter contemplated herein, whichever occurs first. Article III Terms of Payment Payments to the ENGINEER will be made as follows: A. Invoice and Payment (1) The Engineer shall provide the City sufficient documentation, including but not limited to meeting the requirements set forth in Attachment D to this AGREEMENT, to reasonably substantiate the invoices. (2) The ENGINEER will issue monthly invoices for all work performed under this AGREEMENT. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days of receipt. c11-k;0,5 ��9 11-k;0, 9ry pf Fort Worth,Texas OFFICIAL RECO1W �t dard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Page 1 of Revised 17 11.17.17 CITY TX a SECRETARY 9" .WORM M (3) Upon completion of services enumerated in Article I, the final payment of any balance will be due within 30 days of receipt of the final invoice. (4) In the event of a disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested will be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. The CITY will exercise reasonableness in contesting any bill or portion thereof. No interest will accrue on any contested portion of the billing until mutually resolved. (5) If the CITY fails to make payment in full to ENGINEER for billings contested in good faith within 60 days of the amount due, the ENGINEER may, after giving 7 days' written notice to CITY, suspend services under this AGREEMENT until paid in full. In the event of suspension of services, the ENGINEER shall have no liability to CITY for delays or damages caused the CITY because of such suspension of services. Article IV Obligations of the Engineer Amendments to Article IV, if any, are included in Attachment C. A. General The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering representative under this Agreement, providing professional engineering consultation and advice and furnishing customary services incidental thereto. B. Standard of Care The ENGINEER shall perform its services: (1) with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent engineers practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or similar circumstances and professional license; and (2) as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional skill and care of a competent engineer. C. Subsurface Investigations (1) The ENGINEER shall advise the CITY with regard to the necessity for subcontract work such as special surveys, tests, test borings, or other subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 2 of 17 work to be performed hereunder. The ENGINEER shall also advise the CITY concerning the results of same. Such surveys, tests, and investigations shall be furnished by the CITY, unless otherwise specified in Attachment A. (2) In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations, the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points and sample intervals and at locations other than where observations, exploration, and investigations have been made. Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect the total PROJECT cost and/or execution. These conditions and cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of the ENGINEER. D. Preparation of Engineering Drawings The ENGINEER will provide to the CITY the original drawings of all plans in ink on reproducible mylar sheets and electronic files in .pdf format, or as otherwise approved by CITY, which shall become the property of the CITY. CITY may use such drawings in any manner it desires; provided, however, that the ENGINEER shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project other than the PROJECT described herein. E. Engineer's Personnel at Construction Site (1) The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site, whether as on-site representatives or otherwise, do not make the ENGINEER or its personnel in any way responsible for those duties that belong to the CITY and/or the CITY's construction contractors or other entities, and do not relieve the construction contractors or any other entity of their obligations, duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all construction methods, means, techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents and any health or safety precautions required by such construction work. The ENGINEER and its personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or safety precautions. (2) Except to the extent of specific site visits expressly detailed and set forth in Attachment A, the ENGINEER or its personnel shall have no obligation or responsibility to visit the construction site to become familiar with the progress or quality of the completed work on the PROJECT or to determine, in general, if the work on the PROJECT is being performed in a manner City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 3 of 17 indicating that the PROJECT, when completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents, nor shall anything in the Contract Documents or this AGREEMENT between CITY and ENGINEER be construed as requiring ENGINEER to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to discover latent defects in the work or otherwise check the quality or quantity of the work on the PROJECT. If the ENGINEER makes on-site observation(s) of a deviation from the Contract Documents, the ENGINEER shall inform the CITY. (3) When professional certification of performance or characteristics of materials, systems or equipment is reasonably required to perform the services set forth in the Scope of Services, the ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely upon such certification to establish materials, systems or equipment and performance criteria to be required in the Contract Documents. F. Opinions of Probable Cost, Financial Considerations, and Schedules (1) The ENGINEER shall provide opinions of probable costs based on the current available information at the time of preparation, in accordance with Attachment A. (2) In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type, management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate PROJECT cost or schedule. Therefore, the ENGINEER makes no warranty that the CITY's actual PROJECT costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from the ENGINEER's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates. G. Construction Progress Payments Recommendations by the ENGINEER to the CITY for periodic construction progress payments to the construction contractor will be based on the ENGINEER's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling and observation that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations have been made by the ENGINEER to ascertain that the construction contractor has completed the work in exact accordance with the Contract Documents; that the final work will be acceptable in all respects; that the ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purpose City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 4 of 17 the construction contractor has used the moneys paid; that title to any of the work, materials, or equipment has passed to the CITY free and clear of liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there are not other matters at issue between the CITY and the construction contractor that affect the amount that should be paid. H. Record Drawings Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of information compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent the exact location, type of various components, or exact manner in which the PROJECT was finally constructed. The ENGINEER is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the information from others that is incorporated into the record drawings. I. Minority Business and Small Business Enterprise (MBE)(SBE) Participation In accord with the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity goals (Chapter 20, Article X of the City's Code of Ordinances a/k/a Ordinance No. 20020-12- 2011, as amended), the City has goals for the participation of minority business enterprises and/or small business enterprises in City contracts. Engineer acknowledges the MBE and SBE goals established for this contract and its accepted written commitment to MBE and SBE participation. Any misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent misrepresentation) and/or the commission of fraud by the Engineer may result in the termination of this Agreement and debarment from participating in City contracts for a period of time of not less than three (3) years. J. Right to Audit (1) ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after final payment under this contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of the ENGINEER involving transactions relating to this contract. ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary ENGINEER facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. The CITY shall give ENGINEER reasonable advance notice of intended audits. (2) ENGINEER further agrees to include in all its subconsultant agreements hereunder a provision to the effect that the subconsultant agrees that the CITY shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after final payment under the subcontract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 5 of 17 directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such subconsultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that the CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all subconsultant facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space, in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article together with subsection (3) hereof. CITY shall give subconsultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits. (3) ENGINEER and subconsultant agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the CITY. The CITY agrees to reimburse ENGINEER for the cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed. K. INSURANCE (1) ENGINEER'S INSURANCE a. Commercial General Liability — the ENGINEER shall maintain commercial general liability (CGL) and, if necessary, commercial umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 per each occurrence with a $2,000,000.00 aggregate. If such Commercial General Liability insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this PROJECT or location. i. The CITY shall be included as an additional insured with all rights of defense under the CGL, using ISO additional insured endorsement or a substitute providing equivalent coverage, and under the commercial umbrella, if any. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to any other insurance or self- insurance programs afforded to the CITY. The Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall have no exclusions or endorsements that would alter or nullify: premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or advertising injury, which are normally contained within the policy, unless the CITY specifically approves such exclusions in writing. ii. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents, officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by the commercial general liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance maintained in accordance with this agreement. b. Business Auto — the ENGINEER shall maintain business auto liability and, if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall cover City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 6 of 17 liability arising out of "any auto", including owned, hired, and non-owned autos, when said vehicle is used in the course of the PROJECT. If the engineer owns no vehicles, coverage for hired or non-owned is acceptable. i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents, officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by the business auto liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by ENGINEER pursuant to this agreement or under any applicable auto physical damage coverage. c. Workers' Compensation — ENGINEER shall maintain workers compensation and employers liability insurance and, if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less than $100,000.00 each accident for bodily injury by accident or $100,000.00 each employee for bodily injury by disease, with $500,000.00 policy limit. i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents, officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the extent these damages are covered by workers compensation and employer's liability or commercial umbrella insurance obtained by ENGINEER pursuant to this agreement. d. Professional Liability — ENGINEER shall maintain professional liability, a claims-made policy, with a minimum of $1,000,000.00 per claim and aggregate. The policy shall contain a retroactive date prior to the date of the contract or the first date of services to be performed, whichever is earlier. Coverage shall be maintained for a period of 5 years following the completion of the contract. An annual certificate of insurance specifically referencing this project shall be submitted to the CITY for each year following completion of the contract. (2) GENERAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS a. Certificates of insurance evidencing that the ENGINEER has obtained all required insurance shall be attached to this AGREEMENT prior to its execution. b. Applicable policies shall be endorsed to name the CITY an Additional Insured thereon, subject to any defense provided by the policy, as its interests may appear. The term CITY shall include its employees, officers, officials, agents, and volunteers as respects the contracted services. City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 7 of 17 c. Certificate(s) of insurance shall document that insurance coverage specified in this agreement are provided under applicable policies documented thereon. d. Any failure on part of the CITY to attach the required insurance documentation hereto shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements. e. A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material change in coverage shall be provided to the CITY. A ten (10) days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. Notice shall be sent to the respective Department Director (by name), City of Fort Worth, 1000 Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. f. Insurers for all policies must be authorized to do business in the State of Texas and have a minimum rating of A:V or greater, in the current A.M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. g. Any deductible or self insured retention in excess of $25,000.00 that would change or alter the requirements herein is subject to approval by the CITY in writing, if coverage is not provided on a first-dollar basis. The CITY, at it sole discretion, may consent to alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups. Dedicated financial resources or letters of credit may also be acceptable to the CITY. h. Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY as respects the PROJECT. i. The CITY shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring expense, to review the ENGINEER's insurance policies including endorsements thereto and, at the CITY's discretion; the ENGINEER may be required to provide proof of insurance premium payments. j. Lines of coverage, other than Professional Liability, underwritten on a claims-made basis, shall contain a retroactive date coincident with or prior to the date of the contractual agreement. The certificate of insurance shall state both the retroactive date and that the coverage is claims-made. k. Coverages, whether written on an occurrence or claims-made basis, shall be maintained without interruption nor restrictive modification or changes from date of commencement of the PROJECT until final payment and termination of any coverage required to be maintained after City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 8 of 17 final payments. I. The CITY shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any insurance premiums required by this agreement. m. Sub consultants and subcontractors to/of the ENGINEER shall be required by the ENGINEER to maintain the same or reasonably equivalent insurance coverage as required for the ENGINEER. When sub consultants/subcontractors maintain insurance coverage, ENGINEER shall provide CITY with documentation thereof on a certificate of insurance. L. Independent Consultant The ENGINEER agrees to perform all services as an independent consultant and not as a subcontractor, agent, or employee of the CITY. The doctrine of respondeat superior shall not apply. M. Disclosure The ENGINEER acknowledges to the CITY that it has made full disclosure in writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest, including personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in property abutting the proposed PROJECT and business relationships with abutting property cities. The ENGINEER further acknowledges that it will make disclosure in writing of any conflicts of interest that develop subsequent to the signing of this contract and prior to final payment under the contract. N. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances (1) If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or suspected, the ENGINEER will stop its own work in the affected portions of the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation. (2) If asbestos or other hazardous substances are suspected, the CITY may request the ENGINEER to assist in obtaining the services of a qualified subcontractor to manage the remediation activities of the PROJECT. O. Permitting Authorities - Design Changes If permitting authorities require design changes so as to comply with published design criteria and/or current engineering practice standards which the ENGINEER should have been aware of at the time this Agreement was executed, the ENGINEER shall revise plans and specifications, as required, at its own cost and expense. However, if design City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 9 of 17 changes are required due to the changes in the permitting authorities' published design criteria and/or practice standards criteria which are published after the date of this Agreement which the ENGINEER could not have been reasonably aware of, the ENGINEER shall notify the CITY of such changes and an adjustment in compensation will be made through an amendment to this AGREEMENT. P. Schedule ENGINEER shall manage the PROJECT in accordance with the schedule developed per Attachment D to this AGREEMENT. Article V Obligations of the City Amendments to Article V, if any, are included in Attachment C. A. City-Furnished Data ENGINEER may rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the CITY. B. Access to Facilities and Property The CITY will make its facilities accessible to the ENGINEER as required for the ENGINEER's performance of its services. The CITY will perform, at no cost to the ENGINEER, such tests of equipment, machinery, pipelines, and other components of the CITY's facilities as may be required in connection with the ENGINEER's services. The CITY will be responsible for all acts of the CITY's personnel. C. Advertisements, Permits, and Access Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, the CITY will obtain, arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses required by local, state, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights- of-way, and access necessary for the ENGINEER's services or PROJECT construction. D. Timely Review The CITY will examine the ENGINEER's studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 10 of 17 an attorney, insurance counselor, accountant, auditor, bond and financial advisors, and other consultants as the CITY deems appropriate; and render in writing decisions required by the CITY in a timely manner in accordance with the project schedule prepared in accordance with Attachment D. E. Prompt Notice The CITY will give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever CITY observes or becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of the ENGINEER's services or of any defect in the work of the ENGINEER or construction contractors. F. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances Release. (1) CITY acknowledges ENGINEER will perform part of the work at CITY's facilities that may contain hazardous materials, including asbestos containing materials, or conditions, and that ENGINEER had no prior role in the generation, treatment, storage, or disposition of such materials. In consideration of the associated risks that may give rise to claims by third parties or employees of City, City hereby releases ENGINEER from any damage or liability related to the presence of such materials. (2) The release required above shall not apply in the event the discharge, release or escape of hazardous substances, contaminants, or asbestos is a result of ENGINEER's negligence or if ENGINEER brings such hazardous substance, contaminant or asbestos onto the project. G. Contractor Indemnification and Claims The CITY agrees to include in all construction contracts the provisions of Article IV.E. regarding the ENGINEER's Personnel at Construction Site, and provisions providing for contractor indemnification of the CITY and the ENGINEER for contractor's negligence. H. Contractor Claims and Third-Party Beneficiaries (1) The CITY agrees to include the following clause in all contracts with construction contractors and equipment or materials suppliers: "Contractors, subcontractors and equipment and materials suppliers on the PROJECT, or their sureties, shall maintain no direct action against the ENGINEER, its officers, employees, and subcontractors, for any claim arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from the engineering services performed. Only the CITY will be the beneficiary City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 11 of 17 of any undertaking by the ENGINEER." (2) This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the CITY and the ENGINEER and there are no third-party beneficiaries. (3) The CITY will include in each agreement it enters into with any other entity or person regarding the PROJECT a provision that such entity or person shall have no third-party beneficiary rights under this Agreement. (4) Nothing contained in this Section H. shall be construed as a waiver of any right the CITY has to bring a claim against ENGINEER. I. CITY's Insurance (1) The CITY may maintain property insurance on certain pre-existing structures associated with the PROJECT. (2) The CITY may secure Builders Risk/Installation insurance at the replacement cost value of the PROJECT. The CITY may provide ENGINEER a copy of the policy or documentation of such on a certificate of insurance. (3) The CITY will specify that the Builders Risk/Installation insurance shall be comprehensive in coverage appropriate to the PROJECT risks. J. Litigation Assistance The Scope of Services does not include costs of the ENGINEER for required or requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. In the event CITY requests such services of the ENGINEER, this AGREEMENT shall be amended or a separate agreement will be negotiated between the parties. K. Changes The CITY may make or approve changes within the general Scope of Services in this AGREEMENT. If such changes affect the ENGINEER's cost of or time required for performance of the services, an equitable adjustment will be made through an amendment to this AGREEMENT with appropriate CITY approval. City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 12 of 17 Article VI General Legal Provisions Amendments to Article VI, if any, are included in Attachment C. A. Authorization to Proceed ENGINEER shall be authorized to proceed with this AGREEMENT upon receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the CITY. B. Reuse of Project Documents All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products of the ENGINEER, whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments of service for this PROJECT, whether the PROJECT is completed or not. Reuse, change, or alteration by the CITY or by others acting through or on behalf of the CITY of any such instruments of service without the written permission of the ENGINEER will be at the CITY's sole risk. The CITY shall own the final designs, drawings, specifications and documents. C. Force Majeure The ENGINEER is not responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the control of the ENGINEER that prevent ENGINEER's performance of its obligations hereunder. D. Termination (1) This AGREEMENT may be terminated a.) by the City for its convenience upon 30 days' written notice to ENGINEER. b.) by either the CITY or the ENGINEER for cause if either party fails substantially to perform through no fault of the other and the nonperforming party does not commence correction of such nonperformance within 5 days' written notice or thereafter fails to diligently complete the correction. (2) If this AGREEMENT is terminated for the convenience of the City, the ENGINEER will be paid for termination expenses as follows: a.) Cost of reproduction of partial or complete studies, plans, specifications or other forms of ENGINEER'S work product; City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 13 of 17 b.) Out-of-pocket expenses for purchasing electronic data files and other data storage supplies or services; C.) The time requirements for the ENGINEER'S personnel to document the work underway at the time of the CITY'S termination for convenience so that the work effort is suitable for long time storage. (3) Prior to proceeding with termination services, the ENGINEER will submit to the CITY an itemized statement of all termination expenses. The CITY'S approval will be obtained in writing prior to proceeding with termination services. E. Suspension, Delay, or Interruption to Work The CITY may suspend, delay, or interrupt the services of the ENGINEER for the convenience of the CITY. In the event of such suspension, delay, or interruption, an equitable adjustment in the PROJECT's schedule, commitment and cost of the ENGINEER's personnel and subcontractors, and ENGINEER's compensation will be made. F. Indemnification In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the ENGINEER shall indemnify or hold harmless the CITY against liability for any damage committed by the ENGINEER or ENGINEER's agent, consultant under contract, or another entity over which the ENGINEER exercises control to the extent that the damage is caused by or resulting from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier. CITY is entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees in proportion to the ENGINEER's liability. G. Assignment Neither party shall assign all or any part of this AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the other party. H. Jurisdiction The law of the State of Texas shall govern the validity of this AGREEMENT, its interpretation and performance, and any other claims related to it. The venue for any litigation related to this AGREEMENT shall be Tarrant County, City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 14 of 17 Texas. I. Severability and Survival If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any reason to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this AGREEMENT shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. Articles V.F., VI.B., VI.D., VI.F., VI.H., and VI.I. shall survive termination of this AGREEMENT for any cause. J. Observe and Comply ENGINEER shall at all times observe and comply with all federal and State laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any way affect this AGREEMENT and the work hereunder, and shall observe and comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which may exist or may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be considered. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY and all of its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims or liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law, ordinance, or regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees. K. Immigration Nationality Act ENGINEER shall verify the identity and employment eligibility of its employees who perform work under this Agreement, including completing the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (1-9). Upon request by CITY, ENGINEER shall provide CITY with copies of all 1-9 forms and supporting eligibility documentation for each employee who performs work under this Agreement. ENGINEER shall adhere to all Federal and State laws as well as establish appropriate procedures and controls so that no services will be performed by any ENGINEER employee who is not legally eligible to perform such services. ENGINEER SHALL INDEMNIFY CITY AND HOLD CITY HARMLESS FROM ANY PENALTIES, LIABILITIES, OR LOSSES DUE TO VIOLATIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH BY ENGINEER, ENGINEER'S EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS, AGENTS, OR LICENSEES. CITY, upon written notice to ENGINEER, shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement for violations of this provision by ENGINEER. L. Prohibition On Contracts With Companies Boycotting Israel ENGINEER acknowledges that in accordance with Chapter 2270 of the City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 15 of 17 Texas Government Code, CITY is prohibited from entering into a contract with a company for goods or services unless the contract contains a written verification from the company that it: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract. The terms "boycott Israel" and "company" shall have the meanings ascribed to those terms in Section 808.001 of the Texas Government Code. By signing this contract, ENGINEER certifies that ENGINEER'S signature provides written verification to the CITY that ENGINEER: (1) does not boycott Israel, and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract. This AGREEMENT, including its attachments and schedules, constitutes the entire AGREEMENT, which supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, and may only be changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. This AGREEMENT may be executed in one or more counterparts and each counterpart shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. The following attachments and schedules are hereby made a part of this AGREEMENT: Attachment A - Scope of Services Attachment B - Compensation Attachment C -Amendments to Standard Agreement for Engineering Services Attachment D - Project Schedule Attachment E - Location Map — (Not-Included City-wide Facilities Project) City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 16 of 17 Duly executed by each party's designated representative to be effective on the date subscribed by the City's designated Assistant City Manager. BY: BY: CITY OF FO T WORTH ENGINEER CDM Smith, Inc Jay Ch pa Assistant City Manager J. Dan Shannon, P.E. ,� Senior Vice President Date: 07Z""2-1 /f3 Date: APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: 04-- Christopher Harder, P.E. Interim Director, Water Department Contract Compliance Manager: By signing, I acknowledge that I am the person responsible for the monitoring and administration of this contract, including ensuring all performance and reporting requirements. L44� Alexander Pierce Engineering Manager APPRIVED AS TO F ND LEGALITY By: _.. Assistant City Attorn ATT T: O �,L,` Form 1295 No. 2018-358597 Off, — Mary J. Kay ri 3: M&C No.: C-28753 City Secretary M&C Date: 6/26/2018 City of Fort Worth,Texas Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services OFFICIAL.RECORD Revised Date:11.17.17 Page 17 of 17 CITY SECRETARY FST.Mum,TX ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT ATTACHMENT A Scope for Professional Engineerincq Services SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT The scope set forth herein defines the work to be performed by the ENGINEER in completing the Fort Worth Water Department (FWWD) SCADA System Feasibility Assessment Project (Project). Both the CITY and ENGINEER have attempted to clearly define the work to be performed and address the needs of the Project. WORK TO BE PERFORMED The Project will include the following primary scope requirements: ■ Assess the feasibility for migration of the existing HSQ MISER SCADA system to a non-proprietary SCADA Human-Machine Interface (HMI) ■ Review of CITY Information Technology (IT) strategic direction, organizational objectives, and support responsibilities as related to the potential SCADA migration. SCADA Migration Assessment The existing FWWD SCADA system utilizes various HMI platforms (GE Cimplicity, Allen Bradley Factory Talk, HSQ MISER)for control, operation and monitoring of water production and distribution facilities, including wholesale customers, and sanitary lift stations. To fulfill the associated primary scope requirement, this Project will consider relevant findings from previous, applicable FWWD SCADA studies while performing the following general activities: ■ Assess the existing in-plant and remote facilities SCADA infrastructure ■ Investigate SCADA system PLC and network alternatives ■ Evaluate non-proprietary SCADA HMI system alternatives ■ Develop the SCADA migration plans, schedules and opinions of probable cost for recommended capital improvements projects Information Technology Strategic Direction Review The SCADA Assessment portion of this Project will identify inherent risks associated with the support of strategic, mission critical systems used by the FWWD. It is therefore also necessary to assess the strategic direction of technology systems and services with respect to the CITY's Operational Technology (OT) and Information Technology (IT) needs of the City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:07.23.2012 Page 1 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT business units supported by SCADA, as well as previous Plans, as listed below, completed by Water Information Technology (WIT), such as: ■ 2017 Department of Homeland Security Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Assessment ■ 2010 WIT Master Plan ■ 2004 WIT Plan These assessments focused on the mission critical nature of FWWD operations to CITY governmental services and the interconnectedness of the applications within the utility. Specific risks associated with third party support of these services were addressed. Since those assessments, WIT has expanded its OT and IT related services to more fully support core end to end business processes. These include an enterprise wide work and asset management system, updated billing and customer relationship management system, and the MyH2O/AMI program, all of which have far reaching impacts on FWWD operations. Consequently, the implications associated with a SCADA migration add to the list of mission critical system enhancements that must be examined. The Project will include a task to focus on IT strategic direction, organizational objectives, and support responsibilities in the context of the upgrade of the SCADA system. Project Assumptions In developing the scope of work discussed in this proposal, the ENGINEER has made the assumptions outlined below: 1. For the water distribution system, the ENGINEER will visit only representative remote sites such as a water distribution pump station, raw water pump station, ground storage tank, elevated storage tank, wholesale potable water customer site, and a sewer lift station. 2. For each plant site to be visited, the ENGINEER will document existing SCADA architecture. This includes the top-end SCADA, its controls and communications architecture, network architecture (Local and Wide Area Network), and typical connection to remote sites. 3. Representation of the existing network diagrammatically will be based on existing documentation currently in the possession of the ENGINEER or as provided by the CITY. 4. Preparation of an inventory of all equipment at each site is not included in this scope of work, but the effort and estimated cost to conduct such an inventory will be included in the final report. 5. When documenting SCADA assets, the ENGINEER will utilize a non-intrusive approach through visual inspection. Intrusive methods of documenting IP addresses, port settings, and routing is not included in this scope of work. 6. The CITY will provide existing documentation for each site: a. Physical addresses b. 1/0 points list City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 2 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT c. Radio network documentation d. Plant fiber optic network documentation e. Operations staff representatives to explain unique characteristics for each site f. Construction documents for each Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and remote site as required. 7. The proposed schedule duration for this Project is eight (8) months, with the following estimated execution periods: a. Kickoff meeting, data collection, needs assessment, site visits —60 to 90 days from Notice to Proceed (NTP). b. Preparation of Existing System Architecture—60 to 120 days from NTP. c. HMI Evaluation - 60 to 210 days from NTP. d. Intermediate Workshops (all tasks) - 60 to 180 days from NTP. e. Draft Migration Plan and Costs— 150 days from NTP f. Draft and Final Report with review workshops - 180 to 240 days from NTP g. Baseline schedule will be prepared and submitted following NTP Project Tasks The overall Project approach will include six tasks: Task 1 — Project Management Task 2—SCADA Infrastructure Investigation/Study and Assessment Task 3 —SCADA System Evaluation and Alternatives Task 4—SCADA HMI System Evaluation Task 5- Review of IT Strategic Direction Task 6— Final Report TASK 1 — PROJECT MANAGEMENT. ENGINEER shall ensure efficient and effective use of ENGINEER's and CITY's time and resources. ENGINEER shall manage change, ■ communicate effectively, ■ coordinate internally and externally as needed, and ■ proactively address issues with the CITY's Project Manager and others as necessary to make progress on the work. Task 1.1 — Managing the Team ■ Lead, manage and direct design team activities ■ Ensure quality control is practiced in performance of the work ■ Communicate internally among team members ■ Task and allocate team resources City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 3 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT 1.2—Communications and Reporting ■ Attend a Project kickoff/chartering meeting with CITY staff to confirm and clarify scope and understand CITY objectives so the Project meets the CITY requirements ■ Conduct review meetings as described in this scope of work. ■ Prepare invoices and submit monthly in the format requested by the CITY. ■ Prepare and submit monthly progress reports (8 total). ■ Prepare and submit baseline Project Schedule and Project Schedule status updates with monthly progress reports, identify schedule changes and provide explanations for changes. ■ Coordinate with other agencies and entities as necessary for the design of the proposed infrastructure and provide and obtain information needed to execute the Project. ■ With respect to coordination with permitting authorities, ENGINEER shall communicate with permitting authorities such that their regulatory requirements are appropriately reflected in their work. ENGINEER shall work with regulatory authorities as required and make changes necessary to meet their requirements, as applicable to the Project scope. ■ Personnel and Vehicle Identification: When conducting site visits to the Project locations, the ENGINEER or any of its sub-consultants shall carry readily visible information identifying the name of the company and the company representative. ■ CITY confirmed approval of Departmental Waiver of MBE/SBE Subcontracting/Supplier Goals. MWBE reporting will not be required nor provided for the Project. ASSUMPTIONS • 8-month Project duration (from NTP) ■ 4 progress updates with CITY staff in addition to noted workshops Deliverables A. Monthly invoices and progress report B. Monthly progress reports C. Baseline design schedule D. Monthly schedule updates with schedule narrative describing any current or anticipated schedule changes TASK 2— SCADA INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTIGATION/STUDY AND ASSESSMENT. The purpose of this task is for the ENGINEER to: City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 4 of 15 ATTACHMENTA ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT ■ Document the existing SCADA system network ■ Confirm with the CITY the ENGINEER's understanding of the SCADA system. Task 2.1 — In-Plant SCADA System Assessment The ENGINEER will perform a site visit to each of the CITY's water treatment plants (4 total) and conduct discussions with the respective facility staff to review and document the condition of the existing SCADA System at each plant. Prior to the site visits, the ENGINEER will develop, in conjunction with the CITY, site inspection forms and checklists to streamline the data collection process. The inspection forms, checklists, and digital photographs will be used to document the site visits. In advance of the site visits, the ENGINEER will submit to the CITY a listing of requested, existing documentation that will include, but not be limited to, the following: ■ Existing plant drawings ■ Latest set of plans and specifications for SCADA System ■ O&M manuals ■ Existing control strategy ■ Standard operating procedures The ENGINEER will be responsible for reproduction of all print copies provided and will provide necessary electronic storage devices for copying of applicable electronic files. Each site visit will focus on the major functional levels of the SCADA system including hardware, software, network connectivity, and operational functionality. The site visits will be conducted by the ENGINEER, accompanied by the CITY's operations and maintenance staff responsible for the respective site. The ENGINEER will document and assess the physical condition of each major component at each site. The ENGINEER will conduct site visits to document both in-plant network communication, Wide Area Network (WAN) communication between plants via telco T1 lines, and SCADA communication master at Holly WTP that communicates to all remote facilities. In addition, the ENGINEER will conduct onsite interviews with plant personnel to confirm understanding of the existing system redundancy and reliability features. For each of the WTPs, a complete in-plant system architecture diagram will be developed and provided to the City for review. The documented SCADA system and architecture for each plant surveyed will serve as the basis for the minimum SCADA system requirements during the HMI evaluation task of the project. It is assumed that each site visit will be a one-day trip, exclusive of the North and South Holly WTPs, which are assumed will require two, one-day trips. Each WTP site visit will involve two ENGINEER personnel. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 5 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT Deliverables The following deliverables will be submitted to the CITY at the completion of the above listed activities in the form of a technical memorandum (TM): ■ Copies of inspection forms, interviews, checklists, and digital photos ■ Draft existing network architecture diagrams ■ Draft Technical Memorandum No. 1 (Task 2.1 and Task 2.2) Note that for security purposes, detailed information of IP addresses and port settings (as provided by the CITY)will not be presented in draft deliverables. The ENGINEER will work with the CITY to determine the best method to document this information to reduce the risk of a cyber security vulnerability. Task 2.2 — Distribution System Assessment The ENGINEER will visit a representative number of distribution system and remote sites and conduct discussions with the respective CITY staff to review, document, and assess the conditions of the subject sites. The ENGINEER will conduct a site visit to a representative remote site of each of the following facility types: ■ Water Distribution Pump Station • Raw water Pump Station ■ Ground Storage Tank ■ Elevated Storage Tank ■ Wholesale Water Customer Location ■ Sewer Lift Station Facility Prior to the site visits, the ENGINEER will develop, in conjunction with the CITY, site inspection forms and checklists to streamline the data collection process. The inspection forms, checklists, and digital photographs will be used to document the site visits. In advance of the site visits, the ENGINEER will submit to the CITY a listing of requested, existing documentation that will include, but not be limited to, the following: ■ Existing SCADA WAN network diagram ■ Site Plans ■ Drawing of existing RTU/PLC enclosures ■ RTU/PLC architecture ■ Communication protocol ■ Networking hardware City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 6 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT ■ Network routing drawing ■ O&M manuals ■ Existing control strategy Each site to be visited will focus on the major functional levels of the SCADA system including, PLCs, communications networks, and operational functionality. The five different 900 MHz licensed frequencies used to communicate with pump stations, lift stations, tanks, and meter sites will also be documented. The site visits will be conducted by the ENGINEER, accompanied by the CITY's operations and maintenance staff responsible for the respective site. The ENGINEER will document and assess the physical condition of each major component at each site. The information gathered for each representative site visited will be used to generate the updated SCADA network diagram to be included in a draft technical memorandum. It is assumed that a half-day trip (6 total)will be required for each of the identified remote sites and each site visit will involve two ENGINEER personnel. Deliverables The documented remote sites and remote communication to the SCADA master surveyed will serve as the basis for the migration path planning. The following deliverables will be submitted to the CITY at the completion of the above listed activities in the form of a technical memorandum (TM): ■ Copies of inspection forms, checklists, and digital photos ■ Draft existing network architecture diagrams • Draft Technical Memorandum No. 1 (Task 2.1 and Task 2.2)— 10 paper copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) Task 2.3—Validation Workshops Upon completion of Task 2.1 and Task 2.2, the ENGINEER will conduct a workshop with the CITY to communicate findings and to validate understanding of the existing SCADA system at each plant, the WAN communication infrastructure, and the SCADA master at Holly and its WAN that connects the remote facilities. For the discussion, the ENGINEER will develop a network diagram of the existing SCADA system along with functional characteristics for the workshop. Prior to the workshops, the CITY will deliver to the ENGINEER comments regarding the draft TM No. 1. Comments will be compiled by the CITY into a single response document and submitted to the ENGINEER within two-weeks of TM No. 1 submission and prior to the workshop. It is assumed that two separate half-day workshops will be executed, one for the in- plant SCADA system and one for the distribution SCADA system which monitors and controls remote sites. It is assumed that two ENGINEER personnel will participate in the workshops. The result of the workshops will be used to update the draft TM No. 1, which will then be finalized. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 7 of 15 ATTACHMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT Deliverables ■ Workshop agenda, documents, and notes —electronic PDF ■ Final Technical Memorandum No. 1 — 10 paper copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) TASK 3.0 —SCADA SYSTEM EVALUATION AND ALTERNATIVES The purpose of this task is for the ENGINEER to: ■ Evaluate alternative PLC hardware platforms for facility and remote sites ■ Evaluate the existing and alternative network alternatives for redundancy, security and expandability. Task 3.1 — Programmable Logic Controller This task will investigate up to three (3) viable alternatives of PLC hardware platforms for use at remote sites and the water treatment plants as part of the migration planning to migrate existing HSQ RTUs to an industry recognized open protocol such as Modbus RTU, Modbus TCP, and DNP3. Key considerations will include at a minimum the following: ■ User familiarity ■ Standard protocol supported ■ After sale service ■ Software licensing cost ■ Total cost of ownership ■ Local support ■ Supported communication protocol ■ IEC61131 compliant ■ Market share The ENGINEER will assist the CITY to identify the technical requirements for a new PLC/RTU architecture that will meet the future CITY needs to migrate from the proprietary HSQ RTU platform to a more open PLC architecture. This task consists of providing a detailed analysis of functional alternatives for meeting the CITY SCADA system requirements. The ENGINEER will work with the CITY's SCADA stakeholders to identify a set of functional alternatives to be analyzed along with a set of criteria for evaluating the merits of each functional alternative. These criteria will typically include functionality, communication driver availability, data buffering capability, long term parts availability, space allocation in existing electrical enclosures (when applicable) implementation and support cost, implementation approach, maintainability, and expandability. The ENGINEER will submit a draft analysis criteria document for CITY review. The CITY will provide a compiled set of review comments within one-week to the ENGINEER, at which time a half-day workshop will be conducted to review CITY comments and finalize the criteria document for PLC system requirements. It is City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 8 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT assumed that two ENGINEER personnel will participate. Following the workshop, the criteria document will be finalized and distributed. An analysis will be provided for each selected alternative using the evaluation criteria, and a recommended alternative for each area of consideration will be provided. Per discussions with FWWD staff, the following industry recognized platforms will be evaluated, in addition to a third to be determined jointly by the ENGINEER and CITY: ■ Rockwell Automation Allen Bradley ■ Schneider Electric Modicon For each facility/site location type identified in Task 2.2, a typical hardware configuration will be developed. The ENGINEER will develop an opinion of probable cost for the configurations. Deliverables The following deliverables will be submitted to the CITY at the completion of the above listed activities: ■ Workshop agenda, documents, and notes—electronic PDF ■ Analysis criteria document—electronic PDF ■ Draft Technical Memorandum No. 2 (Task 3.1 and Task 3.2)— 10 paper copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) Task 3.2—Communication Network Alternatives This task will follow the recommendations set forth in the Communication and Backup Server Study developed by CDM Smith Inc. for in-plant and remote communications. The ENGINEER will identify any existing single points of failure for the in-plant communication network and investigate alternatives, including redundant communication paths for the remote site communication network. Several key considerations will be included in these evaluations: ■ Redundancy: At this time, all remote site data communications are dependent on a single path. Eliminating single-point-of-failure will warrant redundant communications for reliability. ■ Cyber Security: The existing radios will be evaluated for data encryption protection. Alternatives to existing radios will provide for proper data encryption. Other cybersecurity aspects such as implementation of field firewall, managed switch, etc. will be taken into consideration. Site physical security will likewise play a role in ensuring the CITY's remote site SCADA system is secure from unauthorized access. ■ Expandability: The system should be adaptable for addition of new remote sites. Leveraging the Communication and Backup Server Study produced by CDM Smith, the ENGINEER will review the existing network architecture and determine what additional infrastructure is needed to supplement existing infrastructure such as City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:06.1.2014 Page 9 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT redundant communication pathways between the North and South Holly WTPs and redundant paths from each remote site back to the SCADA master at the Holly WTP. The evaluation will consider the following items: ■ Communication infrastructure to ensure its capability to support a phased migration of remote PLC/RTUs • Communication infrastructure including WAN connection between plants to support the new SCADA HMI ■ Network infrastructure to provide network segmentation based on Department of Homeland Security (DHS) guidelines to support implementation of an enterprise historian to serve non-SCADA data users ■ For remote sites, implementation of field firewall needed to ensure DHS guidelines are followed ■ Leverage existing investments with the best flexibility ■ Industry accepted and proven connectivity It is assumed that a half-day workshop will be required to gather inputs on communication infrastructure requirements and this will involve two ENGINEER personnel. Deliverables The following deliverables will be submitted to the CITY and included in the Final Report: ■ Advantages and disadvantages for each alternative ■ Conceptual SCADA network diagram ■ Draft Technical Memorandum No. 2 (Task 3.1 and Task 3.2) — 10 paper copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) Task 3.3 — Requirements and Alternatives Review Workshop Upon completion of tasks 3.1 and 3.2, the ENGINEER will conduct two half-day workshops with the CITY to communicate and review findings related to the evaluation of the defined alternatives presented in Technical Memorandum No. 2. The existing SCADA system capability will be used as the baseline to set requirements for the new SCADA system that includes the supervisory level HMI, communication network, and the end device PLC/RTU. Each of the defined alternatives will be presented during the workshop to solicit feedback from CITY Staff. Prior to the workshops, the CITY will deliver to the ENGINEER comments regarding the draft TM No. 2. Comments will be compiled by the CITY into a single response document and submitted to the ENGINEER within two-weeks of TM No. 2 submission and prior to the workshop. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 10 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT It is assumed that two separate half-day workshops will be executed, one for the in- plant SCADA system and one for the SCADA system that monitor and control remote sites. The result of the workshops will be used to update the draft TM No. 2, which will then be finalized. Deliverables ■ Workshop agenda, documents, and notes — electronic PDF ■ Final Technical Memorandum No. 2 — 10 paper copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) TASK 4.0 —SCADA HMI SYSTEM EVALUATION The purpose of this task is for the ENGINEER to: ■ Identify and evaluate alternative HMI packages for potential HSQ MISER replacement. • Define and coordinate vendor HMI demonstrations. Task 4.1 — HMI Feature Collection The ENGINEER will identify and summarize key features associated with up to 3 HMI packages for potential MISER replacement. From previous discussions with the CITY, the following HMI packages will be examined: ■ Ignition ■ Wonderware ■ I-Fix The ENGINEER will investigate published information and conduct in-office demonstrations of the HMIs being investigated. Assessments of the findings will be documented and these will include examination of the following HMI characteristics: ■ Hardware, Networking and Communications 1. Server-level and client-level hardware requirements 2. Communication drivers and protocols supported 3. Focus on protocols to be used so the new SCADA system can communicate with all current PLCs and RTUs ■ Database 1. Type of database used 2. Number of data base points supported and limitations 3. Details on interfacing with other databases (export and import data from different data bases and current HSQ database) ■ Reports 1. What is needed to create customized reports. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 11 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT 2. Modules needed. 3. Scripting requirements (if any) 4. Type of database used ■ User Interface 1. Graphics libraries size and availability 2. Ability to deploy and distribute new slides without having to update each client's PC. 3. Alarms and Notifications a. Text and e-mail alerts b. Alarm character descriptor limits c. Logic, calculation, formulation, and tolerance availability. ■ Historical Data Handling, backups, retrieval. 1. Will historical data be easy to retrieve and view for reporting and troubleshooting purposes? 2. How will it handle historical data and application configuration backups? a. Will it backup daily/weekly or if any files changed b. Will it backup anytime the application has changed 3. How will it handle automatic failover and server redundancy? ■ Security. 1. What's needed to secure the system based on architecture suggested. 2. Secure mobile devices or remote access capability 3. User account with password protection and control privilege capability • Scalability. 1. Details on adding new servers, PLCs or RTUs. 2. Details on adding graphics (slides)/database point/tags 3. Details on Upgrading a. What's needed to be upgraded and how often b. Any downtime cause by upgrading c. License requirements to receive updates d. Dependency: operating system,java, other third-party software • Support: 1. 24/7 support or local integrator availability. 2. Diagnostic tool availability for identifying root cause ■ Cost: 1. Details of one-time fee and annual license fees considering number of servers, number of users, #of tags, and support agreement for each platform. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 12 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT ■ Detail assessment on what will be needed for the new SCADA to interface with other CITY systems: 1. Info works and info water(hydraulic modeling software) 2. Maximo (maintenance management system) 3. Info master(asset modeling software) 4. Emerson Ovation at Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility Deliverables The following deliverables will be submitted to the CITY and included in the Final Report: ■ Comparison table of characteristics for each HMI ■ Draft Technical Memorandum No. 3 (without recommendations)for reference during Vendor Demonstrations Task 4.2— HMI Vendor Demonstrations Selected HMI vendors will be invited to present their systems in-person to the CITY and the ENGINEER. Vendors will be provided a copy of the draft TM No. 3 findings prior to the demonstrations. It is assumed that three (3) half-day vendor workshops, one per vendor, will be scheduled and conducted. The ENGINEER will develop and distribute for CITY review and reference individual workshop summaries. After CITY review of the summaries, one (1) half-day review workshop will be conducted to discuss and compare the vendors. CITY comments during the review workshops will be documented and utilized to complete the final Technical Memorandum No. 3 with recommendations. Deliverables The following deliverables are included in this subtask: ■ Written summaries of workshops ■ Final TM No. 3 (with recommendations)for incorporation into final report— 10 paper copies and TASK 5.0 — REVIEW OF IT STRATEGIC DIRECTION, ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND SUPPORT RESPONSIBILITIES Task 5.1 — Business Process Mapping and Impacts of Supporting Technologies The ENGINEER will review the previous Plans identified above to assess WIT alignment towards the previously identified goals and to expand upon the previous recommendations as they relate to WIT's strategic direction (specific organizational structure/objectives, staffing levels/responsibilities). Specifics of the work conducted in this task will include: City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 13 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT ■ Map high level business processes to information technology systems. Refer to business process mapping done for the MyH2O/AMI program. These include but are not limited to SCADA, Work and Asset Management, Billing, GIS, Meter Reading/AMI, LIMS, Capital Project Management. ■ List the impact on business processes should their supporting technologies fail. Develop opinions of the consequence of failure of any of the technology systems. ■ Define IT staffing by business process and by information system. Describe what unique training and experience is needed to support each system. ■ Describe the process for strategic IT planning within a complex business environment such as a water and wastewater utility. Deliverables The following deliverables will be submitted to the CITY at the completion of Task 5 as a technical memorandum section: ■ Business Process Mapping at a high level ■ Draft summary (electronic PDF) of overall findings Task 5.2 — Strategic Vision Recommendations The ENGINEER will deliver to the CITY the draft summaries from Task 5.1 for CITY review of the work conducted. The CITY will provide compiled comments to the ENGINEER within 2 weeks. The ENGINEER will review CITY comments and present recommendations in a half- day briefing with CITY staff. The ENGINEER will update the draft summaries and compile into a technical memorandum for inclusion in the final report. Deliverables The following deliverables will be submitted to the CITY at the completion of the above listed activities in the form or section of a technical memorandum: ■ Briefing agenda, documents, and notes— electronic PDF ■ Technical Memorandum No. 4 covering IT Consolidation Assessment of Risk— 10 paper copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) TASK 6.0 — FINAL REPORT Task 6.1 — Draft Report This task will involve preparation of the overall Project report. The draft report will combine the technical memoranda and summaries from Tasks 2 thru Task 5 into a single document. Based on the combined findings of the previous Tasks, the report will also include development and description of the following: ■ Overall SCADA Migration Plan (Plan) concept including planning schedule City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 14 of 15 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SCADA SYSTEM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT PROJECT ■ Opinions of probable construction cost to migrate existing SCADA systems as defined in the Plan ■ Suggested capital improvement plan sequencing. Deliverables ■ Draft report— 10 hard-copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) Task 6.2 —Validation Workshops It is assumed the CITY will provide compiled review comments for the Draft Report within 2 weeks of submittal. Following receipt of comments, the ENGINEER will conduct two (2), half-day workshops. The first workshop will include ENGINEER presentation of a report overview and the collection/discussion of CITY comments. The second workshop will review the updated report prior to submitting to CITY. Deliverables ■ Report Power-Point presentation ■ Meeting agendas, documentation and notes Task 6.3— Final Report The ENGINEER will update and distribute the final report to the CITY. Deliverables ■ Final Project report— 10 printed copies and electronic PDF (2 copies) End of Attachment A City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date:08.1.2014 Page 15 of 15 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION Design Services for SCADA System Feasibility Assessment Project Time and Materials with Rate Schedule Project I. Compensation A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated for personnel time, non-labor expenses, and subcontract expenses in performing services enumerated in Attachment A as follows: i. Personnel Time. Personnel time shall be compensated based upon hours worked directly in performing the PROJECT multiplied by the appropriate Labor Category Rate for the ENGINEER's team member performing the work. Labor Category Rate as presented in the rate schedule table below is the rate for each labor category performing the work and includes all direct salaries, overhead, and profit. Labor Category 2018 Rate ($/hour) Principal $330 Pro'ect Manager $210 Senior Engineer/Tech Specialist $235 En ineer 7 $210 Engineer 6/5 $160 Engineer 4/3 $145 Engineer 2/1 $115 CADD $115 Administrative $115 ii. Non-Labor Expenses. Non-labor expenses shall be reimbursed as Direct Expenses at invoice or internal office cost. Direct Expenses (non-labor) include, but are not limited to, mileage, travel and lodging expenses, mail, supplies, printing and reproduction services, other direct expenses associated with delivery of the work; plus applicable sales, use, value added, business transfer, gross receipts, or other similar taxes. iii. Subcontract Expenses. Subcontract expenses and outside services shall be reimbursed at cost to ENGINEER plus a markup of ten percent (10%). iv. Budgets. ENGINEER will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget and will keep the City informed of progress toward that end so that the budget or work effort can be adjusted if found necessary. ENGINEER is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budgets, as may be adjusted, nor is the City obligated to pay ENGINEER beyond these limits. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date:8.09.2012 Page 1 of 4 B-1 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION If ENGINEER projects, in the course of providing the necessary services, that the PROJECT cost presented in Article 2 of this Agreement will be exceeded, whether by change in scope of the project, increased costs or other conditions, the ENGINEER shall immediately report such fact to the City and, if so instructed by the City, shall suspend all work hereunder. When any budget has been increased, ENGINEER's excess costs expended prior to such increase will be allowable to the same extent as if such costs had been incurred after the approved increase. B. The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Section II - Method of Payment. II. Method of Payment A. The ENGINEER shall be paid by the City based upon an invoice created on the basis of statements prepared from the books and records of account of the ENGINEER, based on the actual hours and costs expended by the ENGINEER in performing the work. B. Each invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this Agreement by an officer of the ENGINEER. C. ENGINEER shall prepare and submit invoices in the format and including content as presented in Exhibit B-1. D. Payment of invoices will be subject to certification by the City that such work has been performed. III. Progress Reports A. The ENGINEER shall prepare and submit to the designated representative of the Water Department monthly progress reports and schedules in the format required by the City. City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date:8.09.2012 Page 2 of 4 B-2 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION IV. Summary of Total Project Fees Firm Primary Responsibility Fee Amount I % Prime Consultant CDM Smith, Inc Project Mgmt/ Engineering $180,168 44% Proposed MBE/SBE Sub-Consultants Gupta &Assoc, Inc Engineering $185,640 46% Non-MBE/SBE Consultants Brio Consulting Engineering $39,424 10% TOTAL $ 405,232 100% Project Number & Name Total Fee MBE/SBE Fee MBE/SBE SCADA System Feasibility $ 405,232 $ 185,640 46% Assessment Stud City MBE/SBE Goal = N/A-City Waiver Consultant Committed Goal = N/A City Waiver % City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date:8.09.2012 Page 3 of 4 B-3 y d) c0 n M O1 00 n ti co N M 00 — f0 O h "' N ^ O A 1Ny7 M N n r lA ti r CO N O N N 'n O A N m r 69 O O 0D co N st r CO M OI co c0 N O O M 0) O O m O N N N N M w t C%; O F°, N fAN 1 QN VopN Nc+J M tM 64 6N). M 9Cf 66R, 6s pNN Q f0'O p ObgLO N n N N O VII cm N�b9 6HNN N N oQ OwfOff Nw � dwil h OFYO- NN o st V Oy 7YtDF O �wp 0NONoo � N00 N N 4 Q 04 g 0Meq �� - pp p6N 499 f9 N�2 w 64).44, , pN� N yN v a o v mN ! w Y► 61► N N p N (rj w N 4c,* N7 �'0 �) co CO !00 co V co N ` oi (W N N N 10 Q b4 NI cc"!V V k 01 O Ni N� idD M O M M /0 III N A N �'� N EO N M N N id M M w N N M M '.N M, iD N N N' iN N N I Ili I C ' E L 13 m L N 00 O co CO CO co i D U a j r 0 M m Z Ln O N N N N 'iN N'N {'O'1 O 7 N O C', Ni N r ,w, CN CD O , m W N W tO -C WO E W CL C L O O O I O O c00 000 047 W OA W Lef a V N N N N N N N N N a N N Ci! L 00 00 OW co 0 O w co W N N N V r _ a` t0 0 O m U � o. m .v L 04 04 It N N N N N N O N Nlv v C L oa a � '- V J L y d Q O-0 z y, U U C N C M � f�R E _ 9 o c OU N N Z y Q) O O d m ayi m o 1O E Z _o is o ° o0 y E z C E a m_ «? N a ° ,rn y y C y m e N a Q a .° C E m F W w c c-a cc E m w m y O -C n F y p F w m S y Q a > o w ° y m ° n a s t m O .0 LCL 0 E NylyL w m y m s m� � L �o IS E O) I++ y C Z '� t0 E y y O o m c Q;y f w m c o > L m m m� LL d 10mU cUc > y °�yN `o dj cLSSIUroo IIY LL ov Q .0 y O C y i J y C 3 S a y V 4,:S. C i(� G— O U m O li y C m m d C m 0 Cn O C C = o Q Q m y �,� 9 Q m m 9 3 `� _ �!� m U U� i � m Q 'Bm mmE ppm .Y � gppEjQEE .9A q:oc �8 -i 8 o¢aa ' E a�Q - a Q U E m a Q a"S 'u, a m,c :° U m a U c .2o U a y .� U po = U m ° Ei @ m a c 2 Ci C) lA W CL U) U, � � > tAgJaIdUQMM = 2Mwmtnmli!O > OLLrA O 0 0 N O O O ,r, I O O O 0 0 N O O ,p O O O Q F. Z cV N N M M 6 1n cO fO f0 Z ATTACHMENT "C" CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT Engineering Services for SCADA Feasibility Assessment Project No changes or amendments to Standard Agreement City of Fort Worth,Texas Attachment C PMO Release Date:05.19.2010 Page I of 1 � � � CLH H « � R � . . Q 7 R u Q : o � © D / Jd O � 2 � ¢ � CD DfoC: z Lu � 2 & « U ° W o d v Q ƒ \ $ a. 0 � ® 2 ? � E \ k $ b � k o / co k / » k o 2 0 0 co ) § $ \ / § $ @ ' \ C', / \ \ cu f � % k \ $ k t > 2 ¥ E / \ / k / § / / o § / - E@ k 2@ § / R k a \ \ \ \ E / m o E & ® I 3 % \ & � & \ _ E _ 7 o k k / o § § \ / k % ® U $ § k § & / R / ƒ O k U < o U \ k m I CO & \ a $ m Q % m \ \ I % x E Q & \ , , , , » % 1 » % r % » m % M M « 5 ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ w « g k k k k k k k k k k k k k k « k k k k « k k k k 4 k R 9 g R 9 R 9 q r # r c Hcn $ LL $ ±L � H 2 0 $ / / cu co F Co CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 loft Complete Nos.1-4 and 6 if there are interested parties. OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos.1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place Certificate Number: of business. 12018-358597 CDM Smith Inc. Fort Worth,TX United States Date t=iled: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is 05/24/2018 being filed. City of Fort Worth,Texas Date Acknowledged: 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a description of the services,goods,or other property to be provided under the contract. N/A SCADA System Feasibility Assessment 4 Nature of interest Name of Interested Party City,State,Country(place of business) (check applicable) Controlling I Intermediary Bouchard,Anthony Boston,MA United States X Down,James Boston,MA United States X Walters,Gae Boston,MA United States X Desmaris,Thierry Boston,MA United States X Wall,Timothy Boston,MA United States X Tunnicliffe, Peter Boston,MA United States X Stevenson, Howard Boston,MA United States X 5 Check only if there is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 UNSWORN DECLARATION My name is J. Dan Shannon , and my date of birth is July 2 4. 195 6 Myaddressis 801 Cherry Street, Suite 1820, Fort Worth TX 76133 USA (street) (city) (state) (zip code) (country) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in Tarrant County, State of Texas on the_2_4 day of May 2018 . (month) (year) Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity (Declarant) Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.5523 DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 14��® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 07/03/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES = C7 BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED o REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. cJ a IMPORTANT:If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this 211 certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: 'O Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc. PHONE (866) 283-7122 FAX (800) 363-0105 v Boston MA Office (AIC.No.Ext): AIC.No.): 53 state Street E-MAIL suite 2201 ADDRESS: _ Boston MA 02109 USA INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURER A: National Union Fire Ins CO Of Pittsburgh 19445 CDM Smith Inc. INSURER B: New Hampshire Insurance Company 23841 75 state street, Suite 701 Boston MA 02109 USA INSURER C: American Home Assurance Co. 19380 INSURERD: Illinois National Insurance Co 23817 INSURERE: Lloyd's syndicate No. 2623 AA1128623 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 570072169944 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. Limits shown are as requested LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER MM/DDIYYYY) fMM1DDfYYYY1 LIMITS A X COMMERCIALGENERALLIABILITY GL EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 CLAIMS-MADEX❑OCCUR PREMISES Ea occurrence $300,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $2,000,000 GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMITAPPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $4,000,000 On POLICY ❑X JET ❑X LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG S4,000,000 0 OTHER: � A CA 1921822 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY $2,000,000 2,QQQ QQQ AOS Ea accident .. A X ANY AUTO CA 1921821 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 BODILY INJURY(Perperson) 2 OWNED SCHEDULED MA BODILY INJURY(Per accident) N AUTOS ONLY AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGF. HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNEDV ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per accident w d ;E. BRELLAUABOCCUR EACH OCCURRENCECESSLIARCLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE RETENTION B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND wc014649625 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 X STATUTE ORH EMPLOYERS'LIABILnY ANY PROPRIETOR I PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y 1 N AOS E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 B CFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED? NIA WC014649626 OI/Ol/2018 01/01/2019 (Mandatory in NH) AK,AZ,VA E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000-_ E Archit&Eng Prof PSDEF1800033 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 Each Claim $1,000,000 Professional/Claims Made Aggregate $1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached H more space is required) CJ Re: SCADA System Feasibility Assessment Project. The City of Fort Worth is included as Additional Insured in accordance with thepolicy provisions of the General Liability 4t policy. General Liability evidenced herein is Primary to other insurance available to an Additional Insured, but only in ^+ accordance with the policy's provisions. A Waiver of Subrogation is granted in favor of the City of Fort worth, its agents officers, directors and employees in accordance with the policy provisions of the General Liability. Automobile Liability. and Workers Compensation policies. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. City of Fort Worth AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVF. Water Department r Attn: Alexander Pierce ( �__ ��� 200 Texas street �5'S'��n Fort Worth TX 76102 USA �Gswslels stat ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016103) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 10518329 LOC#: '4 ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page _ of _ AGENCY NAMED INSURED Aon Risk services Northeast, Inc. CDM Smith Inc. POLICY NUMBER see Certificate Number: 570072169944 CARRIER NAIC CODE see Certificate Number: 570072169944 EFFECTIVE DATE: ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER INSURER INSURER INSURER ADDITIONAL POLICIES If a policy below does not include limit information,refer to the corresponding policy on the ACORD certificate form for policy limits. POLICY POLICY INSR ADDL SUBR EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD W,� POLICYNUMBER LIMITS DATE DATE MM/DD/VYYY MM/DDNYYY WORKERS COMPENSATION c N/A wc014649627 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 CA D N/A WcO14649628 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 FL B N/A Wc014649629 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 IL, KY, NC, NH, UT, VT B N/A WC014649630 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 MA, ND, OH, WA, WI, WY B N/A wc014649631 01/01/2018 01/01/2019 NJ, PA ACORD 101(20081011) ©2008 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD M&C Review Page 1 of 2 Official site of the City of Fort Worth,Texas CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR, T ;T1I COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 6/26/2018 REFERENCE ** 60SCADA FEASIBILITY DATE: 6/26/2018 NO.: C-28753 LOG NAME: PROJECT-CDM CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC NO HEARING: SUBJECT: Authorize Execution of an Agreement with CDM Smith, Inc., in the Amount of $405,232.00 for the SCADA System Feasibility and Assessment Project (ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize an agreement with CDM Smith, Inc., in the amount of $405,232.00 for the SCADA System Feasibility and Assessment Project. DISCUSSION: The supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system serving the water treatment and distribution system facilities was originally installed in 1987 and upgraded to the current system in 1991. The SCADA system is critical to operating the water system as it allows Staff within a centralized control room to view in real time the system status and to operate and control equipment at remote facilities, like pump stations, storage tanks and wholesale meter stations. The system includes both hardware and software components, some of which are proprietary in nature, including the master servers, the radio communication equipment, leased fiber optic lines, field control and data transmittal devices and the software interface. Past studies have been utilized to make improvements to SCADA communications, system redundancy, and system security. The Water Department would like to migrate to a SCADA system that would allow for the removal of proprietary hardware, to be replaced with the use of non-proprietary hardware with the ability to communicate over multiple communication protocols and pathways. This assessment would include an evaluation of alternative SCADA software platforms, considering such factors as costs, reporting capabilities, scalability, security, support, and the ability to interface with the SCADA system in use at the Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility, as well as with hydraulic modeling software, computerized maintenance management systems, and asset management software. As part of this assessment, the consultant will perform an inventory of existing SCADA components, recommend a network architecture compatible with Homeland Security guidelines, develop an implementation plan and schedule, and provide detailed cost estimates for the phased implementation. A Request for Proposals for the SCADA System Feasibility and Assessment Project was advertised on November 9 and November 16, 2017. On December 8, 2017, the City received a total of six proposals from engineering consultants. A consultant selection committee recommended that CDM Smith, Inc., be awarded this project. M/WBE OFFICE: A waiver of the goal for MBE/SBE subcontracting requirements was requested by the Department and approved by the M/WBE Office, in accordance with the M/WBE or BDE Ordinance because the purchase of goods or services from the source(s)where subcontracting or supplier opportunities are negligible. This project is located in ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS. http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=26013&councildate=6/26/2018 7/16/2018 M&C Review Page 2 of 2 FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Director of Finance certifies that funds are available in the current operating budget and that prior to an expenditure being made, the Water Department has the responsibility to validate the availability of funds. TO Fund Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount ID ID Year Chartfield 2 FROM Fund Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount ID ID Year Chartfield 2 Submitted for City Manager's Office by: Jay Chapa (5804) Originating Department Head: Chris Harder(5020) Additional Information Contact: Alexander Pierce (8401) ATTACHMENTS 60SCADA FEASIBILITY PROJECT FORM 1295.pdf http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc review.asp?ID=26013&councildate=6/26/2018 7/16/2018 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES FORM 1295 lofl Complete Nos.1-4 and 6 if there are interested parties, OFFICE USE ONLY Complete Nos.1,2,3,5,and 6 if there are no interested parties. CERTIFICATION OF FILING 1 Name of business entity filing form,and the city,state and country of the business entity's place Certificate Number: of business. 2018-358597 CDM Smith Inc. Fort Worth,TX United States Date Filed: 2 Name of governmental entity or state agency that is a party to the contract for which the form is 05/24/2018 being filed. City Of Fort Worth,Texas Date Ackno led . —� //Jz/v/ 3 Provide the identification number used by the governmental entity or state agency to track or identify the contract,and provide a description of the services,goods,or other property to be provided under the contract. N/A SCADA System Feasibility Assessment Nature of interest 4 Name of Interested Party City,State Count ry(place of business) (check applicable) Controlling Intermediary Bouchard,Anthony Boston,MA United States X Down,James Boston,MA United States X Walters,Gae Boston,MA United States X Desmaris,Thierry Boston,MA Unked States X Wall,Timothy Boston,MA United States X Tunnicliffe,Peter Boston,MA United States X Stevenson, Howard Boston,MA United States X 5 Check only if there Is NO Interested Party. ❑ 6 UNSWORN DECLARATION My name is J. Dan Shannon and my date of birth Is July 24. 195 6 . Myaddressis 801 Cherry Street, Suite 1820, Fort Worth TX 76133 USA (street) (city) (state) (zip code) (country) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in Tarrant County, State of Texas ,on the 2 4 day of May ,2018 . (month) (year) Signature of authorized agent of contracting business entity (Declarant) Forms provided by Texas Ethics Commission www.ethics.state.tx.us Version V1.0.5523