HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 51562 k
BSc f_N'r,-D CITY W-CRETARY
pp�1 �S jt% CONTRACT
Cm OF�OR�wOA�L�
SSCV,50 CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a Texas home-rule
municipality ("CITY"), and CP&Y, Inc., authorized to do business in Texas, ("ENGINEER"),
for a PROJECT generally described as: 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study
Update.
Article I
Scope of Services
The Scope of Services is set forth in Attachment A.
Article 11
Compensation and Term of Agreement
A. The ENGINEER's compensation shall be in the amount up to $592,687 as set
forth in Attachment B.
B. Unless otherwise terminated pursuant to Article VI. D. herein, this Agreement
shall be for a term beginning upon the effective date, as described below, and
shall continue until the expiration of the funds or completion of the subject
matter contemplated herein, whichever occurs first.
Article I11
Terms of Payment
Payments to the ENGINEER will be made as follows:
A. Invoice and Payment
(1) The Engineer shall provide the City sufficient documentation, including but
not limited to meeting the requirements set forth in Attachment D to this
AGREEMENT, to reasonably substantiate the invoices.
(2) The ENGINEER will issue monthly invoices for all work performed under this
AGREEMENT. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days of receipt.
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services OFFICIAL RECORD
Revised Date:11.17.17 b
�i
Page 1 of 17 CITY SECRETARY
H. WORTH, TX
(3) Upon completion of services enumerated in Article I, the final payment of
any balance will be due within 30 days of receipt of the final invoice.
(4) In the event of a disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested
will be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. The
CITY will exercise reasonableness in contesting any bill or portion thereof.
No interest will accrue on any contested portion of the billing until mutually
resolved.
(5) If the CITY fails to make payment in full to ENGINEER for billings contested
in good faith within 60 days of the amount due, the ENGINEER may, after
giving 7 days' written notice to CITY, suspend services under this
AGREEMENT until paid in full. In the event of suspension of services, the
ENGINEER shall have no liability to CITY for delays or damages caused the
CITY because of such suspension of services.
Article IV
Obligations of the Engineer
Amendments to Article IV, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. General
The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering
representative under this Agreement, providing professional engineering
consultation and advice and furnishing customary services incidental
thereto.
B. Standard of Care
The ENGINEER shall perform its services:
(1) with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by competent
engineers practicing in the same or similar locality and under the same or
similar circumstances and professional license; and
(2) as expeditiously as is prudent considering the ordinary professional
skill and care of a competent engineer.
C. Subsurface Investigations
(1) The ENGINEER shall advise the CITY with regard to the necessity for
subcontract work such as special surveys, tests, test borings, or other
subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 2 of 17
work to be performed hereunder. The ENGINEER shall also advise
the CITY concerning the results of same. Such surveys, tests, and
investigations shall be furnished by the CITY, unless otherwise
specified in Attachment A.
(2) In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations,
the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive
test points and sample intervals and at locations other than where
observations, exploration, and investigations have been made.
Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations,
changed or unanticipated underground conditions may occur that
could affect the total PROJECT cost and/or execution. These
conditions and cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of the
ENGINEER.
D. Preparation of Engineering Drawings
The ENGINEER will provide to the CITY the original drawings of all plans in
ink on reproducible mylar sheets and electronic files in .pdf format, or as
otherwise approved by CITY, which shall become the property of the CITY.
CITY may use such drawings in any manner it desires; provided, however,
that the ENGINEER shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any
project other than the PROJECT described herein.
E. Engineer's Personnel at Construction Site
(1) The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site,
whether as on-site representatives or otherwise, do not make the
ENGINEER or its personnel in any way responsible for those duties that
belong to the CITY and/or the CITY's construction contractors or other
entities, and do not relieve the construction contractors or any other entity of
their obligations, duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all
construction methods, means, techniques, sequences, and procedures
necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the construction
work in accordance with the Contract Documents and any health or safety
precautions required by such construction work. The ENGINEER and its
personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction
contractor or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or
any health or safety precautions.
(2) Except to the extent of specific site visits expressly detailed and set forth in
Attachment A, the ENGINEER or its personnel shall have no obligation or
responsibility to visit the construction site to become familiar with the
progress or quality of the completed work on the PROJECT or to determine,
in general, if the work on the PROJECT is being performed in a manner
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:91.17.17
Page 3 of 17
indicating that the PROJECT, when completed, will be in accordance with
the Contract Documents, nor shall anything in the Contract Documents or
this AGREEMENT between CITY and ENGINEER be construed as requiring
_ ENGINEER to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to
discover latent defects in the work or otherwise check the quality or quantity
of the work on the PROJECT. If the ENGINEER makes on-site
observation(s) of a deviation from the Contract Documents, the ENGINEER
shall inform the CITY.
(3) When professional certification of performance or characteristics of
materials, systems or equipment is reasonably required to perform the
services set forth in the Scope of Services, the ENGINEER shall be entitled
to rely upon such certification to establish materials, systems or equipment
and performance criteria to be required in the Contract Documents.
F. Opinions of Probable Cost, Financial Considerations, and Schedules
(1) The ENGINEER shall provide opinions of probable costs based on the
current available information at the time of preparation, in accordance
with Attachment A.
(2) In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility
projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER has no
control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent
conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation
or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market
conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type,
management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic
and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate
PROJECT cost or schedule. Therefore, the ENGINEER makes no
warranty that the CITY's actual PROJECT costs, financial aspects,
economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from the ENGINEER's
opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates.
G. Construction Progress Payments
Recommendations by the ENGINEER to the CITY for periodic construction
progress payments to the construction contractor will be based on the
ENGINEER's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling
and observation that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such
recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations
have been made by the ENGINEER to ascertain that the construction
contractor has completed the work in exact accordance with the Contract
Documents; that the final work will be acceptable in all respects; that the
ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purpose
City of Fort Worlh,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 4 of 17
the construction contractor has used the moneys paid; that title to any of the
work, materials, or equipment has passed to the CITY free and clear of liens,
claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there are not other
_ matters at issue between the CITY and the construction contractor that
affect the amount that should be paid.
H. Record Drawings
Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of
information compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent
the exact location, type of various components, or exact manner in which the
PROJECT was finally constructed. The ENGINEER is not responsible for
any errors or omissions in the information from others that is incorporated
into the record drawings.
L Minority Business and Small Business Enterprise (MBE)(SBE)
Participation
In accord with the City of Fort Worth Business Diversity goals (Chapter 20,
Article X of the City's Code of Ordinances a/k/a Ordinance No. 20020-12-
2011, as amended), the City has goals for the participation of minority
business enterprises and/or small business enterprises in City contracts.
Engineer acknowledges the MBE and SBE goals established for this
contract and its accepted written commitment to MBE and SBE
participation. Any misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent
misrepresentation) and/or the commission of fraud by the Engineer may
result in the termination of this Agreement and debarment from participating
in City contracts for a period of time of not less than three (3) years.
J. Right to Audit
(1) ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall, until the expiration of five (5) years
after final payment under this contract, have access to and the right to
examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers
and records of the ENGINEER involving transactions relating to this
contract. ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall have access during normal
working hours to all necessary ENGINEER facilities and shall be provided
adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in
compliance with the provisions of this section. The CITY shall give
ENGINEER reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
(2) ENGINEER further agrees to include in all its subconsultant agreements
hereunder a provision to the effect that the subconsultant agrees that the
CITY shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after final payment under the
subcontract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 5 of 17
directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such
subconsultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that the
CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all subconsultant
facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space, in
order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article
together with subsection (3) hereof. CITY shall give subconsultant
reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
(3) ENGINEER and subconsultant agree to photocopy such documents as may
be requested by the CITY. The CITY agrees to reimburse ENGINEER for
the cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in
effect as of the time copying is performed.
K. INSURANCE
(1) ENGINEER'S INSURANCE
a. Commercial General Liability -- the ENGINEER shall maintain
commercial general liability (CGL) and, if necessary, commercial
umbrella insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 per each
occurrence with a $2,000,000.00 aggregate. If such Commercial General
Liability insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply
separately to this PROJECT or location.
i. The CITY shall be included as an additional insured with all rights
of defense under the CGL., using ISO additional insured
endorsement or a substitute providing equivalent coverage, and
under the commercial umbrella, if any. This insurance shall apply
as primary insurance with respect to any other insurance or self-
insurance programs afforded to the CITY. The Commercial
General Liability insurance policy shall have no exclusions or
endorsements that would alter or nullify: premises/operations,
products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or
advertising injury, which are normally contained within the policy,
unless the CITY specifically approves such exclusions in writing.
ii. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the commercial general
liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance maintained in
accordance with this agreement.
b. Business Auto — the ENGINEER shall maintain business auto liability
and, if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of
not less than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall cover
City of Fort Worth.Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date;ii.17.17
Page 6of17
liability arising out of "any auto", including owned, hired, and non-owned
autos, when said vehicle is used in the course of the PROJECT. If the
engineer owns no vehicles, coverage for hired or non-owned is
acceptable.
i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the business auto liability or
commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by ENGINEER
pursuant to this agreement or under any applicable auto physical
damage coverage.
c. Workers' Compensation — ENGINEER shall maintain workers
compensation and employers liability insurance and, if necessary,
commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less than
$100,000.00 each accident for bodily injury by accident or $100,000.00
each employee for bodily injury by disease, with $500,000.00 policy limit.
i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by workers compensation and
employer's liability or commercial umbrella insurance obtained by
ENGINEER pursuant to this agreement.
d. Professional Liability — ENGINEER shall maintain professional liability, a
claims-made policy, with a minimum of $1,000,000.00 per claim and
aggregate. The policy shall contain a retroactive date prior to the date of
the contract or the first date of services to be performed, whichever is
earlier. Coverage shall be maintained for a period of 5 years following the
completion of the contract. An annual certificate of insurance specifically
referencing this project shall be submitted to the CITY for each year
following completion of the contract.
(2) GENERAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
a. Certificates of insurance evidencing that the ENGINEER has obtained all
required insurance shall be attached to this AGREEMENT prior to its
execution.
b. Applicable policies shall be endorsed to name the CITY an Additional
Insured thereon, subject to any defense provided by the policy, as its
interests may appear. The term CITY shall include its employees,
officers, officials, agents, and volunteers as respects the contracted
services.
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 7 of 17
c. Certificate(s) of insurance shall document that insurance coverage
specified in this agreement are provided under applicable policies
documented thereon.
d. Any failure on part of the CITY to attach the required insurance
documentation hereto shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance
requirements.
e. A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material change in
coverage shall be provided to the CITY. A ten (10) days notice shall be
acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. Notice shall be sent
to the respective Department Director (by name), City of Fort Worth,
1000 Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
f. Insurers for all policies must be authorized to do business in the State of
Texas and have a minimum rating of AV or greater, in the current A.M.
Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength
and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management.
g. Any deductible or self insured retention in excess of $25,000.00 that
would change or alter the requirements herein is subject to approval by
the CITY in writing, if coverage is not provided on a first-dollar basis. The
CITY, at it sole discretion, may consent to alternative coverage
maintained through insurance pools or risk retention groups. Dedicated
financial resources or letters of credit may also be acceptable to the
CITY.
h. Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation
in favor of the CITY as respects the PROJECT.
i. The CITY shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring
expense, to review the ENGINEER's insurance policies including
endorsements thereto and, at the CITY's discretion; the ENGINEER may
be required to provide proof of insurance premium payments.
j. Lines of coverage, other than Professional Liability, underwritten on a
claims-made basis, shall contain a retroactive date coincident with or
prior to the date of the contractual agreement. The certificate of
insurance shall state both the retroactive date and that the coverage is
claims-made.
k. Coverages, whether written on an occurrence or claims-made basis,
shall be maintained without interruption nor restrictive modification or
changes from date of commencement of the PROJECT until final
payment and termination of any coverage required to be maintained after
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Dale:11,17,17
Page 8 of 17
final payments.
I. The CITY shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any
insurance premiums required by this agreement.
m. Sub consultants and subcontractors to/of the ENGINEER shall be
required by the ENGINEER to maintain the same or reasonably
equivalent insurance coverage as required for the ENGINEER. When
sub consultants/subcontractors maintain insurance coverage,
ENGINEER shall provide CITY with documentation thereof on a
certificate of insurance.
L. Independent Consultant
The ENGINEER agrees to perform all services as an independent
consultant and not as a subcontractor, agent, or employee of the CITY.
The doctrine of respondeat superior shall not apply.
M. Disclosure
The ENGINEER acknowledges to the CITY that it has made full disclosure
in writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest,
including personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in property abutting the
proposed PROJECT and business relationships with abutting property cities.
The ENGINEER further acknowledges that it will make disclosure in writing
of any conflicts of interest that develop subsequent to the signing of this
contract and prior to final payment under the contract.
N. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances
(1) If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or
suspected, the ENGINEER will stop its own work in the affected portions
of the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation.
(2) If asbestos or other hazardous substances are suspected, the CITY may
request the ENGINEER to assist in obtaining the services of a qualified
subcontractor to manage the remediation activities of the PROJECT.
O. Permitting Authorities - Design Changes
If permitting authorities require design changes so as to comply with
published design criteria and/or current engineering practice standards
which the ENGINEER should have been aware of at the time this
Agreement was executed, the ENGINEER shall revise plans and
specifications, as required, at its own cost and expense. However, if design
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 9 of 17
changes are required due to the changes in the permitting authorities'
published design criteria andlor practice standards criteria which are
published after the date of this Agreement which the ENGINEER could not
have been reasonably aware of, the ENGINEER shall notify the CITY of
such changes and an adjustment in compensation will be made through an
amendment to this AGREEMENT.
P. Schedule
ENGINEER shall manage the PROJECT in accordance with the schedule
developed per Attachment D to this AGREEMENT.
Article V
Obligations of the City
Amendments to Article V, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. City-Furnished Data
ENGINEER may rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of
the information provided by the CITY.
B. Access to Facilities and Property
The CITY will make its facilities accessible to the ENGINEER as required for
the ENGINEER's performance of its services. The CITY will perform, at no
cost to the ENGINEER, such tests of equipment, machinery, pipelines, and
other components of the CITY's facilities as may be required in connection
with the ENGINEER's services. The CITY will be responsible for all acts of
the CITY's personnel.
C. Advertisements, Permits, and Access
Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, the CITY will obtain,
arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses
required by local, state, or federal authorities, and land, easements, rights-
of-way, and access necessary for the ENGINEER's services or PROJECT
construction.
D. Timely Review
The CITY will examine the ENGINEER's studies, reports, sketches,
drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 10 of 17
an attorney, insurance counselor, accountant, auditor, bond and financial
advisors, and other consultants as the CITY deems appropriate; and render
in writing decisions required by the CITY in a timely manner in accordance
with the project schedule prepared in accordance with Attachment D.
E. Prompt Notice
The CITY will give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever CITY
observes or becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or
timing of the ENGINEER's services or of any defect in the work of the
ENGINEER or construction contractors.
F. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances Release.
(1) CITY acknowledges ENGINEER will perform part of the work at CITY's
facilities that may contain hazardous materials, including asbestos
containing materials, or conditions, and that ENGINEER had no prior
role in the generation, treatment, storage, or disposition of such
materials. In consideration of the associated risks that may give rise to
claims by third parties or employees of City, City hereby releases
ENGINEER from any damage or liability related to the presence of
such materials.
(2) The release required above shall not apply in the event the discharge,
release or escape of hazardous substances, contaminants, or asbestos
is a result of ENGINEER's negligence or if ENGINEER brings such
hazardous substance, contaminant or asbestos onto the project.
G. Contractor Indemnification and Claims
The CITY agrees to include in all construction contracts the provisions of
Article 1V.E. regarding the ENGINEER's Personnel at Construction Site, and
provisions providing for contractor indemnification of the CITY and the
ENGINEER for contractor's negligence.
H. Contractor Claims and Third-Party Beneficiaries
(1) The CITY agrees to include the following clause in all contracts with
construction contractors and equipment or materials suppliers:
"Contractors, subcontractors and equipment and materials
suppliers on the PROJECT, or their sureties, shall maintain
no direct action against the ENGINEER, its officers,
employees, and subcontractors, for any claim arising out of,
in connection with, or resulting from the engineering
services performed. Only the CITY will be the beneficiary
City of Port Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 11 of 17
of any undertaking by the ENGINEER."
(2) This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the CITY
and the ENGINEER and there are no third-party beneficiaries.
(3) The CITY will include in each agreement it enters into with any other entity
or person regarding the PROJECT a provision that such entity or person
shall have no third-party beneficiary rights under this Agreement.
(4) Nothing contained in this Section H. shall be construed as a waiver of any
right the CITY has to bring a claim against ENGINEER.
I. CITY's Insurance
(1) The CITY may maintain property insurance on certain pre-existing structures
associated with the PROJECT.
(2) The CITY may secure Builders Risklinstallation insurance at the
replacement cost value of the PROJECT. The CITY may provide
ENGINEER a copy of the policy or documentation of such on a certificate of
insurance.
(3) The CITY will specify that the Builders Risk/Installation insurance shall be
comprehensive in coverage appropriate to the PROJECT risks.
J. Litigation Assistance
The Scope of Services does not include costs of the ENGINEER for required
or requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or
assist in litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. In the event CITY
requests such services of the ENGINEER, this AGREEMENT shall be
amended or a separate agreement will be negotiated between the parties.
K. Changes
The CITY may make or approve changes within the general Scope of
Services in this AGREEMENT. If such changes affect the ENGINEER's cost
of or time required for performance of the services, an equitable adjustment
will be made through an amendment to this AGREEMENT with appropriate
CITY approval.
City of Fart Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 12 of 17
Article VI
General Legal Provisions
- Amendments to Article VI, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. Authorization to Proceed
ENGINEER shall be authorized to proceed with this AGREEMENT upon
receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the CITY.
B. Reuse of Project Documents
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products of
the ENGINEER, whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments
of service for this PROJECT, whether the PROJECT is completed or not.
Reuse, change, or alteration by the CITY or by others acting through or on
behalf of the CITY of any such instruments of service without the written
permission of the ENGINEER will be at the CITY's sole risk. The CITY shall
own the final designs, drawings, specifications and documents.
C. Force Majeure
The ENGINEER is not responsible for damages or delay in performance
caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond
the control of the ENGINEER that prevent ENGINEER's performance of its
obligations hereunder.
D. Termination
(1) This AGREEMENT may be terminated
a.) by the City for its convenience upon 30 days' written notice to
ENGINEER.
b.) by either the CITY or the ENGINEER for cause if either party fails
substantially to perform through no fault of the other and the
nonperforming party does not commence correction of such
nonperformance within b days' written notice or thereafter fails to
diligently complete the correction.
(2) If this AGREEMENT is terminated for the convenience of the City, the
ENGINEER will be paid for termination expenses as follows:
a.) Cost of reproduction of partial or complete studies, plans,
specifications or other forms of ENGINEER'S work product;
City of f=ort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
page 13 of 17
b.) Out-of-pocket expenses for purchasing electronic data files and other
data storage supplies or services;
C.) The time requirements for the ENGINEER'S personnel to document
the work underway at the time of the CITY'S termination for
convenience so that the work effort is suitable for long time storage.
(3) Prior to proceeding with termination services, the ENGINEER will
submit to the CITY an itemized statement of all termination expenses. The
CITY'S approval will be obtained in writing prior to proceeding with
termination services.
E. Suspension, Delay, or Interruption to Work
The CITY may suspend, delay, or interrupt the services of the ENGINEER
for the convenience of the CITY. In the event of such suspension, delay, or
interruption, an equitable adjustment in the PROJECT's schedule,
commitment and cost of the ENGINEER's personnel and subcontractors,
and ENGINEER's compensation will be made.
F. Indemnification
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the
ENGINEER shall indemnify or hold harmless the CITY against liability
for any damage committed by the ENGINEER or ENGINEER's agent,
consultant under contract, or another entity over which the ENGINEER
exercises control to the extent that the damage is caused by or
resulting from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual
property infringement, or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier.
CITY is entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees in proportion
to the ENGINEER's liability.
G. Assignment
Neither party shall assign all or any part of this AGREEMENT without the
prior written consent of the other party.
H. Jurisdiction
The law of the State of Texas shall govern the validity of this AGREEMENT,
its interpretation and performance, and any other claims related to it. The
venue for any litigation related to this AGREEMENT shall be Tarrant County,
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:11.17.17
Page 14 of V
Texas.
I. Severability and Survival
If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any
reason to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality, or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this
AGREEMENT shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
provision had never been contained herein. Articles V.F., VI.B., VI.D., VI.F.,
VI.H., and VI.1. shall survive termination of this AGREEMENT for any cause.
J. Observe and Comply
ENGINEER shall at all times observe and comply with all federal and State
laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in
any way affect this AGREEMENT and the work hereunder, and shall
observe and comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which
may exist or may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or
authority for such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance
thereof shall be considered. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless CITY and all of its officers, agents and employees from and
against all claims or liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law,
ordinance, or regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees.
K. Immigration Nationality Act
ENGINEER shall verify the identity and employment eligibility of its
employees who perform work under this Agreement, including completing
the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (1-9). Upon request by CITY,
ENGINEER shall provide CITY with copies of all 1-9 forms and supporting
eligibility documentation for each employee who performs work under this
Agreement. ENGINEER shall adhere to all Federal and State laws as well
as establish appropriate procedures and controls so that no services will
be performed by any ENGINEER employee who is not legally eligible to
perform such services. ENGINEER SHALL INDEMNIFY CITY AND
HOLD CITY HARMLESS FROM ANY PENALTIES, LIABILITIES, OR
LOSSES DUE TO VIOLATIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH BY ENGINEER,
ENGINEER'S EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS, AGENTS, OR
LICENSEES. CITY, upon written notice to ENGINEER, shall have the
right to immediately terminate this Agreement for violations of this
provision by ENGINEER.
L. Prohibition On Contracts With Companies Boycotting Israel
ENGINEER acknowledges that in accordance with Chapter 2270 of the
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
Revised Date:91.17.17
Page 15 of 17
Texas Government Code, CITY is prohibited from entering into a contract
with a company for goods or services unless the contract contains a
written verification from the company that it: (1) does not boycott Israel;
and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract. The terms
"boycott Israel" and "company" shall have the meanings ascribed to those
terms in Section 808.001 of the Texas Government Code. By signing
this contract, ENGINEER certifies that ENGINEER'S signature
provides written verification to the CITY that ENGINEER: (9) does not
boycott Israel, and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the
contract.
This AGREEMENT, including its attachments and schedules, constitutes the entire
AGREEMENT, which supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, and may only be
changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. This AGREEMENT may be
executed in one or more counterparts and each counterpart shall, for all purposes, be
deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the
same instrument. The following attachments and schedules are hereby made a part of
this AGREEMENT:
Attachment A- Scope of Services
Attachment B - Compensation
Attachment C -Amendments to Standard Agreement for Engineering Services
Attachment D - Project Schedule
Duly executed by each party's designated representative to be effective on the date
subscribed by the City's designated Assistant City Manager.
BY: BY:
CITY OF FORT WORTH ENGINEER
CP&Y, Inc.
Fernando Costa
Assistant City Manager S51fephen P. Conner
Vice President
Date:
Date:
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
By: -
William elstead
City of Fort worth,Texas OFFICIAL RECORD
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services t3
Revised Date:11.17.17 CI SECRETAR t{@g
Page 16 of 17 FT
. WORTH rX
Director, Aviation
Contract Compliance Manager:
By signing, I acknowledge that I am the
person responsible for the monitoring and
administration of this contract, including
ensuring all performance and reporting
requirements.
Dakota Shaw
Airport Project Coordinator
APPROVED AS O FORM AND LEGALITY
By:
Assistant City4ttorn
ATT T: `: ,Form 1295 No. 2018-348413
Mary J. Kayse M&C No.: C-28929
City Secretary � .
M&C Date: 11/13/2018
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services OFFICIAL ItECU D
Revised Dale:11.17.17
Page 17 of 17 CITY SECRETARY
FT WORTH,TX,
ATTACHMENT A— SCOPE OF WORK
1.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Program management activities will consist of planning, scheduling, budgeting, financial
strategy development and stakeholder coordination and communication for the Part 150 Noise
Update (the Project). The labor hour estimate is based on a project duration of one (1) calendar
year.
1.1 Work Plan
A detailed work plan will be submitted within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Notice to
Proceed. The work plan will identify the execution and management of the work throughout the
length of the contract.
Roles and responsibilities of key team members will be confirmed and lines of authority and
communication identified. This will be submitted as an organization chart or other type of exhibit
that clearly identifies roles, responsibilities and lines of communication.
1.2 Monthly Status Report
Our staff will maintain regular communications with the Sponsor and other stakeholders. A
monthly report will be prepared to demonstrate the progress and status of the project. This
report will include narrative discussion of issues, accomplishments and schedule and budget
updates.
1.3 Coordination Meetings
Our team will attend coordination meetings with the Sponsor and stakeholders to coordinate
and communicate issues related to the Project. It is anticipated that key staff will attend bi-
weekly project coordination meetings for the duration of the Project.
1.4 Program Budget
We will develop and maintain a program budget that identifies the major project components,
professional services costs, construction costs, contingency and funding sources. This
information will be in the form of spreadsheet and updated monthly and included with the
Monthly Status Report.
1.5 FAA Grant Management
Our staff will prepare the necessary grant applications for submittal to FAA. Invoices and other
expenditures for the Project will be tracked and assigned to a specific FAA grant for payment.
Each month the FAA grant expenditures will be reconciled with the City of Fort Worth to
maintain an accurate accounting of the financial costs. The City of Fort Worth's matching funds
for each FAA grant will be in the form of"land credits". The amount of land available for
matching funds will be identified when the grant application is submitted, when the grant is
received and when the grant is closed, as the actual grant amount may vary.
1.6 Project Schedule
A detailed project schedule will be prepared that identifies dates for key meetings, duration of
activities, submittals, deliverables and other important milestones for the completion of the work.
The project schedule will be reviewed and updated as necessary for the duration of the Project.
ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF WORK
FORT NORTH @ ALLIANCE AIRPORT
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
TITLE 14 CFR PART 150
Boise Exposure Map and
Noise Compatibility Program
Update
SCOPE OF SERVICES
27-February-2018
FORT WORTH ALLIANCE AIRPORT
TITLE 14 CFR PART 150
NOISE EXPOSURE MAP UPDATE
SCOPE OF SERVICES
INTRODUCTION
49 USC 47503 and 14 CFR part 150 require Airport Operators to update their Noise Exposure
Maps (NEMs) whenever there is a change in predicted yearly Day-Night Average Sound Level
(DNL) of 1.5 decibels (dB) or greater over noise sensitive land uses. This requirement to update
the NEMs applies equally to a decrease, as well as an increase, of DNL 1.5 dB over noise
sensitive land uses. FAA funding decisions are based on accurate NEMs, and Fort Worth
Alliance Airport (AFW) is receiving Federal funds to implement their previously-approved Noise
Compatibility Program (NCP). FAA Program Guidance Letter 05-4 provides instructions on this
matter to FAA Regional and Airports District Offices. Guidance Letter 05-4 states:
Absent information to the contrary, NEMs on file with the FAA for less than 5
years may be presumed to be current and project eligibility may be determined
using either the existing or forecast conditions NEMs on file with the FAA.
However, if there is information indicating that the NEMs on file with the FAA do
not reflect recent significant changes that have occurred at the airport that
would affect the noise contours, or if the NEMs are older than 5 years, the
sponsor must certify the existing or forecast year NEM reflects current
conditions at the airport, or the sponsor must submit updated NEMs.
AFW completed their first title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Compatibility Planning Study in 1995. The
most recent Part 150 NCP was approved by the FAA on 1 December 2010. The 2005 Existing
Condition NEM was accepted by the FAA on 6 September 2006 and the 2014 Future Condition
NEM, without Program Implementation, was accepted by the FAA on 5 May 2009. The remedial
land use actions of the ongoing noise mitigation program are based on the 2005 Existing
Condition NEM, while the preventative land use actions are based on the 2014 Future Condition
NEM.
The purpose of this scope is to perform an NEM Update which will allow the FAA, AFW, and the
City of Fort Worth Aviation Department to determine:
(1) Whether the 2005 Existing Condition and the 2014 Future Condition NEMs, accepted by
FAA on 6 September 2006 and 5 May 2009, respectively, are still valid and representative
of the current noise environment at AFW, or
(2) Whether updated NEMs resulting from changes in operational characteristics at AFW
require updates to the associated NCP.
This Scope of Services outlines the tasks to be completed by AECOM to assist the City of Fort
Worth Aviation Department and AFW in the preparation of updated NEMs for AFW. The updated
NEMs will be prepared in accordance with the requirements and guidance outlined in title 14 CFR
part 150.
Page 1 of 18
PHASE I - NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS UPDATE
TASK 1 MOBILIZATION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Task 1,1 Mobilization
This task involves the mobilization, coordination, and management of the non-technical aspects
of the project. This would include a Kick-Off meeting in Fort Worth to discuss the study goals,
objectives, and protocols. This task includes one three-day/two-night trip to Fort Worth by up to
two Consultant staff.
Task 1.2 Project Management
Throughout the duration of the project, the Consultant's Project Manager will be coordinating as
necessary with AFW and the City of Fort Worth Aviation Department staff and others to ensure
that the project and schedule are progressing as planned. This on-going coordination will provide
AFW staff with a consistent, single point-of-contact throughout the duration of the project.
Progress Reports will be prepared monthly and provided to AFW staff, with copies to the FAA.
This task will include coordination meetings required outside the scope of the meetings
associated with the NEM Consultation and Public Involvement, which are described in Task 10,
not to exceed two three-day/two-night trips to Fort Worth by the Consultant's Project Manager.
This task will also include the development of a Project Execution Plan (PXP) which contains
information that includes, but is not limited to, budget, communication flow, a list of deliverables,
and the Quality Assurance I Quality Control methodology that will be used throughout the project.
This methodology will cover the quality assurance detail checking and independent technical
review that is required prior to the completion of each task in this scope and prior to the
submission of any documentation.
TASK 2 LAND USE MAPPING
A detailed Geographical Information System (GIS) dataset of land use, population, and housing
data was developed during the Part 150 Study completed in 2010. This dataset will be updated
and validated for this study, to ensure that compatible and noncompatible land uses in the study
area are accurately identified.
Task 2.1 Update GIS Land Use, Population, and Housing Datasets
Up-to-date demographic information datasets (e.g., aerial photos, land use, and population data)
will be obtained and integrated into the existing GIS. In addition, on-site field review will be
accomplished in order to verify configuration changes, if any,to noise-sensitive areas and specific
noise sensitive sites, as well as validate and obtain additional detail regarding current land uses in
Page 2 of 23
and around the airport property. The on-site field review will require a four day/three night trip to
Fort Worth by two Consultant staff.
Spatial datasets including, but not limited to current land use,jurisdictions, zoning, housing, noise
sensitive sites, airport-related easements, and airport facilities/property will be obtained and
integrated into the GIS. Up-to-date parcel data will be obtained from the cities of Fort Worth and
Haslett, and the counties of Denton and Tarrant for the purpose of identifying recent changes in
parcel configuration and for determining current ownership of parcels in the airport environs.
Associated non-spatial data such as symbology, descriptions, documents, and other qualitative
datasets will be researched, reviewed, and integrated into the GIS. The GIS will be used to
estimate noise exposure within the noise contours developed for this study. Copies of the GIS
databases will be provided to AFW, the City of Fort Worth Aviation Department, and the FAA in
digital format upon completion of the project.
A meeting will be scheduled with the planning and zoning commission staff of all four (4) local
jurisdictions to discuss pending and/or approved development plans in the airport environs. The
Airport Layout Plan (ALP), Airport Master Plan and the Hillwood Properties Master Plan, will be
reviewed to determine any potential future conflicts between the airport and the surrounding
communities. This meeting will coincide with the above mentioned on-site field review.
Task 2.2 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Detail Checking is a verifying procedure whereby all information contained in a deliverable is
verified for correctness, completeness and technical accuracy by a Senior Professional
designated by the Project Manager.
Before inclusion into the NEM Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results, as
outlined in the PXP.
Metadata is information about the data itself, such as its source, accuracy, and the dates during
which it is valid. As needed, metadata about the spatial and non-spatial feature datasets will be
included in the GIS allowing AFW and other users to verify the accuracy and currency of the
datasets.
Task 2.3 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on land use, jurisdictions, zoning, population, and housing
will be prepared in the form of Section 2, Jurisdictions and Land Use in the Noise Exposure
Map Update and Supporting Documentation. (Note: Section 9 will be the Introduction to the
Noise Exposure Map Update and Supporting Documentation.)
Page 3 of 23
TASK 3 INVENTORY OF EXISTING AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
This task consists of collecting data, issuing and collecting questionnaires, and analyzing all
information ultimately obtained.
Task 3.1 Update Aircraft Operations Data
Operational data has not been updated since the completion of the Part 150 Study in 2010. This
task will commence with a review of the data used for the 2010 Study. This review will allow the
Consultant to determine which existing data may no longer be valid, and will assist the Consultant
in determining which sources would provide the most accurate and verifiable data. Historical air
traffic activity records will be collected, reviewed, validated, and updated with the latest available
statistics. Commercial aviation data collection will include origin/destination information leading
to determination of city pairs, route distances, estimated takeoff weights, actual and probable
flight tracks, and any other information that will contribute to the Part 150 Study.
AFW is a mixed use airport; therefore military aircraft operations play an important role in the
activity at AFW. The update of aircraft operations must include a detailed analysis of the current
use by military aircraft operating at AFW.
This task includes one three-day/two-night trip to Fort Worth by two Consultant staff to collect and
update data. Data will include:
Commercial aircraft operations including the following:
• Passenger Air Carriers
• Cargo Air Carriers
• Air Taxi Operators
• Charter Operators
• Aircraft Fleet Mix
General aviation activity including the following:
• Itinerant vs. Local Operations
• Number and Type of Based Aircraft
• Aircraft Fleet Mix
Military activity including the following:
• Itinerant vs. Local Operations
• Aircraft Fleet Mix
Current data will be collected to aid in the determination of existing and future aircraft operational
characteristics. The operational data will form the basis for development of the noise contours.
Data to be collected and analyzed will include the following:
Page 4 of 23
• Fleet Mix
• Number and Type of Operations
• Origin/Destination
• Radar Flight Tracks
• Ground Run-up and Maintenance Activities
® Airspace and Air Traffic
• Day/Night Usage
® Runway Usage
• VFR and IFR Operations
• Instrument Approaches
Aviation related data will be obtained from various sources including, but not limited to:
Airport Traffic Control Tower
• Airport Records
® FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System (A TADS)
• FAA Terminal Area Forecast(TAF)
• Airlines
• Tenants
• Fixed Base Operators
• Military and Other Government Users
Task 3.2 Review Existing Aviation Plans and Studies
Specifically, collection and review of the following information will occur:
• National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS)
• FAA TAF
• Current ALP
• Current Airport Master Plan
• Hillwood Properties Master Plan
• Texas Airport System Plan
• Texas Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan
• Studies accomplished specifically for, or relevant to, the airport
Task 3.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
As prescribed by the PXP, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions
developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
"task 3.4 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on existing airport and aircraft operations will be prepared in
the form of Section 3, Inventory of Existing Airport and Aircraft Activity in the Noise
Exposure Map Update and Supporting Documentation.
Page 5 of 23
TASK 4 FORECAST OF FUTURE AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
The focus of this task is to develop and document airport and aircraft activity forecasts for use in
this Part 150 NEM Update. Unless there is specific information to the contrary, FAA recommends
the TAF should be the basis for the detailed forecast of operations. Forecasts are generally
considered to be consistent with the TAF if they differ by less than 10 percent in the 5-year
forecast period and 15 percent in the 10-year period. This forecast of future aircraft activity will
closely examine current and future military operations at AFW, as a mixed-use facility. This task
will include documenting and obtaining FAA's approval of the forecast, particularly regarding any
proposed changes to the activity level of military aircraft.
Taste 4.1 Forecast of Commercial Operations
Commercial operations at AFW do not depend on passenger traffic; instead consisting of cargo,
corporate and maintenance activity. The forecast will include discussion with the airport users on
any future plans, to include changes in operational levels and fleet mix. It is assumed that unless
specific information is available, the forecast of commercial operations will be within the
acceptable ten percent of the most recently available FAA TAF.
Task 4.2 Forecast of General Aviation Operations
The general aviation (GA) industry has, since the late 1970s, been experiencing the most
dramatic changes in activity and associated indicators since its inception. For example, during
the 1980s, as national and local economic indicators have risen, the number of student pilots,
aircraft sold and general aviation operations have decreased. Reasons given for this trend vary,
including high aircraft prices, high operating costs and interest rates, changes in tax laws and high
product liability costs. Forecasting future activity levels has, as a result, become more
challenging. At the same time, as hourly airfield capacities are approached, insightful
forecasting of all of aircraft activity, including general aviation, becomes paramount.
General aviation forecasts to be developed include the number of itinerant versus local
operations, and fleet. mix. This forecast of GA operations is expected to closely parallel the TAF
forecast of GA operations at AFW, unless specific data or information providing supportable
information that AFW will experience significant changes in GA operations levels.
Task 4.3 Forecast of Military Operations
Military operations play a larger role in the activity level at AFW than at other similarly sized
airports, due to the availability of a local Air Traffic Control Tower and the limited number of
aircraft operations during daytime hours. Both of these factors lead to AFW being a useful facility
for military training flights. A detailed analysis of future military aircraft operations at AFW will be
performed in the development of this forecast, including validation and supporting documentation.
Contact will be made with appropriate U.S. military branches to obtain their estimation of future
Page 6 of 23
itinerant and local military aircraft flight operations and fleet mix at the airport.
Military aviation forecasts to be developed will include itinerant and local operational counts by
aircraft type and time of day. Due to the TAF forecast of military operations being flat throughout
the TAF forecast period, it is assumed that this portion of the forecast will require detailed
documentation to obtain the necessary FAA approval.
This task includes one three-day/two-night trip to Fort Worth by two Consultant staff to collect data
to coincide with the trip in Task 3.1.
Task 4.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
As noted in the PXP, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or
obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 4.6 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on existing airport and aircraft operations will be prepared in
the form of Section 4, Forecast of Future Airport and Aircraft Activity in the Noise Exposure
Map Update and Supporting Documentation.
Sections 1 through 4 will be provided to the City of Fort Worth Aviation Department, AFW, and
FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. Each be provided with three (3)
hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a Microsoft word version on each CD.
Comments and/or mark-ups should be provided to the Consultant in either electronic or hard copy
format. if significant revisions are required, a second version of Section 4, Forecast of Future
Airport and Aircraft Activity will be provided, in the same manner as the first version was
provided.
Before undertaking Task 6, Future Noise Contours, written approval of the forecast from the
City of Fort Worth Aviation Department, AFW, and the FAA is required. The approved version
of Section 4, Forecast of Future Airport and Aircraft Activity will be included in the Noise
Exposure Map Update and Supporting Documentation.
TASK 5 EXISTING NOISE CONTOURS
Task 5.1 Develop Existing Noise Contours
Existing airport and aircraft operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. This information will be
formatted for input into the most current version of FAA's AEDT available at the start of modeling,
currently AEDT 2d. AEDT default database aircraft will be used to model existing aircraft
operations at AFW. AEDT default database departure, approach, and T&G profiles will be used
Page 7 of 23
to model existing aircraft operations at AFW. Flight tracks and military aircraft custom profiles
that were approved for use in the for the 2010 Part 150 Study will be used as needed
If FAA releases a new version of AEDT during the development of the NEMs, they may require
that the study be updated to use the latest version of AEDT. If this occurs, required revisions to
the study will be addressed in a supplemental agreement.
Aircraft engine run-up operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. This information will be
formatted for input into the AEDT. AEDT default database engine run-up identifiers will be used
to model existing engine run-up operations at AFW.
Noise contours representing the combination of flight and engine run-up operations will be
generated at DNL 60, 65, 70, and 75 dB. The DNL 60 dB maybe used to define preventive land
use measures boundaries, but will not be used to quantify noise impacts. The AEDT standard
grid analysis feature will be used to calculate DNL values at up to 20 noise-sensitive sites.
Task 5.2 Evaluate Impacts of the Existing Condition Noise Contours
The DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours which were developed in Task 5.1 will be incorporated
into the GIS database in order to more accurately quantify noise exposure in terms of population,
households, and land use. The DNL 60 dB contour may be used to define preventative land use
measures and may be provided for informational purposes, but will not be used to quantify noise
impacts, nor will it be used for remedial land use measures. Tables will be developed from the
GIS to describe the noise exposure estimates for the Existing Condition. Graphics will be
provided to illustrate the noise contours superimposed over the base mapping and land use.
Noise compatibility will be determined by comparing the modeled DNL noise levels with existing
land use and the FAA Land Use Compatibility Guidelines provided in Table 1 of Appendix A in title
14 CFR part 150.
Task 5.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
A Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task,
and on any subsequent output and results, as instructed in the PXP.
Task 5.4 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on existing condition noise contours will be prepared in the
form of Section 5, Existing Conditions Noise Exposure in the Noise Exposure Map Update
and Supporting Documentation.
TASK 6 FUTURE NOISE CONTOURS
Page 8 of 23
Task 6.1 Develop Future Condition Noise Contours
The future aircraft and airport operations, developed in Task 4, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day for the established forecast
period (five years or more beyond the Existing Condition). This information will be formatted for
input into the most current AEDT version, currently AEDT 2d. AEDT default database aircraft and
departure and approach profiles will be used to model future aircraft operations at AFW. If FAA
releases a new version of AEDT during the development of the NEMS, they may require that the
study be updated to use the latest version of AEDT. if this occurs, required revisions to the study
will be addressed in a supplemental agreement.
Aircraft engine run-up operations data, prepared in Task 4, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. As before, AEDT standard
database engine run-up identifiers will be used to model future engine run-up operations at AFW.
Noise contours representing both flight operations and engine run-up operations will be
generated at DNL 60, 65, 70, and 75 dB. (The DNL 60 dB may be used to define boundaries for
preventive land use measures.) The AEDT standard grid analysis feature will be used to calculate
DNL values at up to 20 noise-sensitive sites.
Task 6.2 Evaluate Impacts of the Future Condition Noise Contours
The DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours for the future conditions which were developed in Task
6.1 will be incorporated into the GIS database in order to more accurately quantify noise exposure
in terms of population, households, and land use. The DNL 60 dB contour may be used to define
preventative land use measures and may be provided for informational purposes, but will not be
used to quantify noise impacts, nor will it be used for remedial land use measures. Tables will be
developed from the GIS to describe the noise exposure estimates for each of the future
conditions. Graphics will be provided to illustrate the noise contours superimposed over the base
mapping and land use. Noise compatibility will be determined by comparing the anticipated DNL
noise levels with existing land use and the FAA land use compatibility guidelines provided in
Table 1 of Appendix A in Part 150.
Task 6.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
As instructed in the PXP, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed
or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 6.4 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on future condition noise contours and supplemental
evaluation metrics will be prepared in the form of Section 6, Future Condition Noise Exposure
in the Noise Exposure Map Update and Supporting Documentation. .
Page 9 of 23
TASK 7 NEM REPORT PREPARATION
Sections 1 through 6 will be compiled and formatted to create the Noise Exposure Map Update
and Supporting Documentation, which will be submitted to FAA for their consideration under
title 14 CFR part 150. Four versions of the NEM Update document will be prepared over the
course of the study. A separate Executive Summary will be prepared. The CD will include both
the NEM document and the Executive Summary. Quantities of each version are estimates of the
needs of the Fort Worth Aviation Department,AFW, and FAA. It is estimated that each version of
the NEM will be comprised of approximately 250 B&W pages(8.5"x 11") and 50 color pages(both
8.5"x 11" and 11"x 17"). Versions 3 and 4 will include six large color exhibits (30"x 42"). The cost
estimate is based on the quantities indicated below. If additional copies are determined to be
necessary, they will be printed and charged to the City of Fort Worth Aviation Department on a per
copy basis.
Prior to submission of the NEM documentation to the City of Fort Worth Aviation Department,
AFW, or the FAA, a comprehensive Independent Technical Review (ITR) will be completed on
each section and on the compiled NEM Documentation, and on the Executive Summary, as
required in the PXP. The ITR will be performed by a qualified Consultant staff not directly
involved in writing the document. The purpose of the ITR is to ensure that all study deliverables
are high quality, technically sound documents.
Task 7.1 City of Fort Worth Aviation Department, Alliance Airport, and FAA
Preliminary Review Document (NEM Version 1)
Version 1 of the NEM will be prepared and submitted to City of Fort Worth Aviation Department,
AFW, and FAA for their review and comment.
City of Fort Worth Aviation Department, AFW, and FAA will each be provided with three (3) hard
copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS word version on each CD. Comments
and/or mark-ups should be provided to the Consultant in either electronic or hard copy format, for
incorporation in Version 2 of the Noise Exposure Map Update and Supporting
Documentation.
City of Port
Worth P�viation
111 Document Distribution WorthDepaiat' FAA Consultant
AFW
NEM Document (Hard Copy) 3 3 1
Executive Summary 3 3 1
NEM Document and Executive 3 3 1
Summary (CD)
Page 10 of 23
Task 7.2 Fort Worth City Council and Public Review(NEM Version 2)
Version 2 of the NEM will incorporate the comments from the City of Fort Worth Aviation
Department, AFW, and FAA, and will be made available to the public and provided to the Fort
Worth City Council for their formal acceptance. Copies of the NEM will be placed in the public
library and the Airport Administration Office for the public to review. Copies will be provided to
the Fort Worth City Council in advance of the Fort Worth City Council meeting during which the
Fort Worth City Council acceptance of the document will be requested. The NEM Executive
Summary will be provided in hard copy and the NEM document will be provided on a CD for
distribution to the Fort Worth City Council. Hard copies of the NEM document will be provided to
City of Fort Worth Aviation Department and placed in the public library for public review. The
Consultant will send copies to the public library.
City of Fort — -
on Avis#t
V2 Docunnent Distrtbution Worth Worth mats FAA Consultant
DepaAFW
NEM Document (Hard Copy) 6 0 1
Executive Summary 40 0 1
NEM Document and Executive 40 0 1
Summary (CD)
Task 7.3 FAA Formal Review(NEM Version 3)
Version 3 of the NEM will document the public involvement process, and be provided to the FAA
for their formal review and acceptance. Five (5) hard copies and five (5) CDs of the Executive
Summary and NEM Document will be provided for the FAA's review and comment The
Consultant will distribute the documents to various FAA Lines of Business as directed by the FAA
Program Manager.
City of Fort
Worth Aviation V3 Document Distribution Worth AvianFAA Consultant
Department,
_ AFW
NEM Document (Hard Copy) 0 5 1
Executive Summary 0 5 1
NEM Document and Executive 0 5 1
Summary (CD)
Task 7.4 Final NEM Document(NEM Version 4)
Version 4 of the NEM document will include the FAA's notice of acceptance and documentation of
Page 11 of 23
compliance with Section 107 of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979, and will
represent the final NEM document for the project. The Executive Summary will be updated to
reflect the public involvement process, FAA's acceptance of the NEMs, and documentation of
compliance with Section 107 of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. Copies will
be provided to the FAA ADO, Region, and Headquarters.
City of Fort
V4 Document Distribution Worth Aviation FAA Consultant
Department,
AFW _
NEM Document (Hard Copy) 5 3 2
Executive Summary 25 3 2
NEM Document and Executive 25 3 2
Summary (CD)
TASK 8 NEM CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
The project will include consultation and public involvement necessary to meet the requirements
of the Part 150 process. The airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity
to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft
Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations.
Task 8.1 Notify § 150,21 (h) "Consulted Parties"
Title 14 CFR part 150,Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, § 150.21 (b) requires that each Noise
Exposure Map and related documentation must be developed and prepared in consultation with
states, and public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of
jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the map, FAA ADO, ATO and Regional
officials, and other Federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map.
This consultation must include regular aeronautical users of the airport.
The Consultant, in coordination with the City of Fort Worth Aviation Department and AFW, will
identify these parties. A letter will be sent to the identified parties informing them that the City of
Fort Worth Aviation Department has initiated a title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Exposure Map Update.
The letter will provide information regarding opportunities for agency involvement in the process.
Task 8.2 Present Information to the Fort Worth City Council
The Consultant will attend up to four (4) Fort Worth City Council meetings in order to present the
findings of the study and ultimately obtain City approval to submit the NEMs to FAA. The
Consultant will prepare information for distribution to the Council and provide one electronic (PDF
format) to AFW for inclusion in the Council agenda package. A copy of Version 2 of the Noise
Exposure Map Update and Supporting Documentation will be provided on CDs for distribution
Page 12 of 23
to the Council in advance of the meeting during which approval will be sought to submit the NEMs
to FAA. This task includes up to four three-day/two-night trips to Fort Worth by the Consultant's
Project Manager.
Task 8.3 Open House Public Information Meeting
One (1) open house public information meeting will be held to inform the public about the
development of updated Noise Exposure Maps for AFW, and to obtain comments from the public.
The open house meeting will be in an informal format and will provide an opportunity for the public
to see displays about the NEM update, visit with Consultants and staff, learn about the process,
and provide their comments. Comment forms will be provided for individuals who wish to submit
written comments. The Consultant will arrange for a Court Reporter to be present to transcribe
oral comments from the public.
The Consultant will prepare and distribute handouts summarizing the results of the study and
announcing the time and location of the public meeting.
The Consultant will prepare a camera-ready Display notice for publication in The Fort Worth
Star-Telegram and will arrange for publication of the public notice at a size of approximately 3
columns by 6 inches. The public notice will be published once approximately two weeks prior to
the meeting. The Consultant will obtain proof of publication from The Fort Worth Star-Telegram
for inclusion in the NEM (Version 3).
Copies of the NEM document will be placed at the public library and in the Airport Administration
office in advance of the meeting,to allow the public an opportunity to review the document prior to
the meeting.
The public meeting will be conducted to present the findings of Tasks 2 through 6. A thorough
analysis of the findings, their significance and effect on the future of the Neighborhood Noise
Mitigation Program will be presented. Hand-outs will be provided summarizing the material
presented at the meeting.
AFW will be responsible for providing for the necessary facilities for the public meeting.
This task includes one three-day/two-night trip to Fort Worth by three Consultant staff.
Task 8.4 Compile and Analyze Public Comments
All comments received on the Part 150 Study, including letters, e-mails, and comment forms, will
be compiled and analyzed. Responses will be drafted as appropriate. Postcards will be mailed
(USPS first class) to all parties who submitted comments (and legibly provided their name and
address), to let them know their comments were received and included in the study.
Page 13 of 23
Task 8.5 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
A Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task,
and on any subsequent output and results, as outlined in the PXP.
Task 8.6 Documentation
A summary of the consultation and public involvement process, as well as a summary of the
comments, will be included in Section 7, Consultation and Public Participation. Copies of all
comments, newsletters, newspaper ads, proof of publication, etc. will be included in appendices
to the Noise Exposure Map Update and Supporting Documentation.
Section 7 will not be provided to the AFW, Fort Worth Aviation Department, or the FAA for review
prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. Section 7 will be provided in an incomplete
manner for NEM Versions 1 through 3, because the public involvement process will be ongoing
during the preparation of these versions. NEM Version 4 will contain complete documentation of
the public involvement process and complete documentation of the FAA review process.
TASK 9 PROCEDURAL REQUIREME=NTS TO LIMIT RECOVERY OF DAMAGES
After FAA acceptance of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation, the
Consultant will follow all procedural requirements outlined in Section 107 of the Aviation Safety
and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (PL 96-193, 49 USC 2101) which provides a process whereby
a person acquiring property in an area surrounding an airport for which a Noise Exposure Map
has been submitted shall be limited in the recovery of damages with respect to noise attributable
to the airport. The Act outlines the requirements and exceptions to this limitation. The
Consultant will ensure that these requirements are met so as to further protect the airport.
The Consultant will prepare a camera-ready public notice for publication in The Fort Worth
Star-Telegram and will arrange for publication of the public notice at a size of approximately 3
columns by 6 inches. The public notice will be published once a week for three consecutive
weeks. The Consultant will obtain proof of publication from The Fort Worth Star-Telegram for
each publication of the public notice for inclusion in the Final NEM (Version 4).
TASK 10 NCP DETERMINATION AND DEVELOPMENT
After initial reviews of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation by the City of
Fort Worth Aviation Department, AFW, and the FAA, a determination will be made as to whether
the 2010 NCP will need to be updated also. If the NCP update is necessary, the Phase 2 Scope
of Services and cost estimate provided will be implemented.
Page 14 of 23
PHASE 2 - NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM
Performance of Phase 2 of this Scope of Services is contingent upon the FAA, City of Fort
Worth Aviation Department and AFW determination that the 2090 Noise Compatibility
Program is no longer appropriate and applicable, after review and acceptance of the
update to the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation.
TASK 11 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This task involves the mobilization, coordination, and management of the non-technical aspects
of Phase 2 of the project. Progress reports will be prepared as needed and provided to AFW
staff. Project management meetings will be held in Fort Worth as needed to coordinate with AFW
staff regarding Phase 2 of the project. This task includes three three-day/two-night trips to Fort
Worth by up to two Consultant staff.
TASK 12 OPERATIONAL NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES
Operational measures which are required by the FAA to be considered as part of the Part 150
process will be evaluated for their applicability and effectiveness at AFW. Title 14 CFR part 150
§B1 50.7(b) indicates that the following alternatives should be analyzed:
The construction of barriers and acoustical shielding, including the soundproofing of public
buildings.
The implementation of a preferential runway system.
The use of flight procedures (including the modifications of flight tracks) to control the
operation of aircraft to reduce exposure to individuals (or specific noise-sensitive areas)to
noise in the area around the airport.
The implementation of any restriction on the use of the airport by any type or class of
aircraft based on the noise characteristics of those aircraft.
• Other actions or combinations of actions, which would have a beneficial noise control or
abatement impact on the public.
Task 12.1 Model Alternative Scenarios
Up to three (3) operational noise abatement alternatives will be modeled using the AEDT for the
five-year future conditions, in order to estimate the possible benefits of operational noise
abatement measures.
Task 12.2 Evaluate Noise Impacts of Alternative Scenarios
Noise exposure for up to three (3) alternative scenarios will be determined with the GIS and
quantified in terms of population, households, and land use. A summary of the measures
examined and their advantages and disadvantages will be developed and coordinated with AFW
Page 15 of 23
staff in order to identify the preferred alternatives for implementation.
Task 12.3 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on operational noise abatement measures will be prepared
in the form of Section 8, Operational Noise Abatement Measures in the Noise Compatibility
Program. (Note: Section 7 will be the Introduction to the Noise Compatibility Program.)
TASK 13 LAND USE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES
Land use noise mitigation measures which are required by the FAA to be considered as part of
the Part 150 process will be evaluated for the applicability and effectiveness at AFW.
Task 13.1 Evaluate Remedial Land Use Mitigation Measures
Remedial actions seek to alleviate existing conflicts between land use and airport noise.
Changes in the use of noise-impacted land or changes in occupancy, to uses or occupations less
sensitive to noise, are practical strategies for resolving conflicts. Noise insulation and acquisition
of full or partial interest in the land are also examples of possible actions that can be used to
mitigate noise impacts. Existing non-compatible land uses will be identified in detail and
potential corrective land use measures will be evaluated. A summary of the measures
examined, and their advantages and disadvantages,will be developed and coordinated with AFW
and City of Fort Worth staff in order to identify the preferred alternatives for implementation.
Task 13.2 Evaluate Preventive Land Use Measures
Land use and development controls that seek to prevent the introduction of additional
non-compatible and noise-sensitive land uses within existing and future noise contours are
referred to as preventive measures. The controls which are generally most useful are: zoning,
easements, transfer of development rights, establishing minimum acoustical insulation standards
for building codes, and land acquisition. The land use controls and regulations identified in Task
2, Phase 1 will be analyzed to determine their capability in order to ensure and maintain
compatibility with airport operations. Additional land use controls and regulatory mechanisms
will be examined, if necessary. These controls and mechanisms will be coordinated with AFW
staff and any other appropriate jurisdictions and/or planning agencies. A summary of the
measures examined and their advantages and disadvantages will be developed and coordinated
with AFW staff in order to identify the preferred alternative(s) for implementation.
Page 16 of 23
Task 13.3 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on land use measures will be prepared in the form of
Section 9, Land Use Measures in the Noise Compatibility Program.
TASK 14 CONTINUING NOISE PROGRAM MEASURES
The success of the NCP requires a continuing effort to monitor compliance and identify new or
unanticipated problems and changing conditions. The Consultant will identify measures that
could become components of such a program. Examples of such measures include:
® Ongoing voluntary noise abatement procedures,
Permanent noise compatibility program management staff,
® Ongoing public involvement programs,
Annual update of noise contours, and
® Acquisition of noise and/or flight track monitoring system/equipment.
Task 14.1 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on continuing noise program measures will be prepared in
the form of Section 10, Continuing Noise Program Measures in the Noise Compatibility
Program.
TASK 16 NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of Tasks 12 through 14 will be compiled, and the measures which collectively appear
to represent the best set of actions for AFW will be identified as the recommended Part 150 Noise
Compatibility Program. AFW will be responsible for selecting those actions, which are desired
for inclusion in the Part 150 NCP. For each individual action, AECOM will provide additional
information regarding the schedule and responsibilities for implementation of the action and its
affect upon improving noise compatibility.
Task 15.1 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on the recommended measures and implementation plan
will be prepared in the form of Section 97, Recommended Noise Compatibility Program in the
Noise Compatibility Program.
TASK 16 NCP CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Phase 2 will include coordination and public involvement necessary to meet the requirements of
the Part 150 process. Prior to and during the development of a program, and prior to submission
of the resulting draft program to the FAA, the airport operator must afford adequate opportunity for
the active and direct participation of the public, to submit their views, data, and comments on the
Page 17 of 23
formulation and adequacy of that program.
Task 16.1 Notify § 150.23 (c) "Consulted Parties"
Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, § 150.23 (c) requires that each noise compatibility
program must be developed and prepared in consultation with FAA regional officials, the officials
of the state and of any public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of
whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the noise exposure map,
and other Federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map.
Consultation with FAA regional officials shall include, to the extent practicable, informal
agreement from FAA on proposed new or modified flight procedures. For air carrier airports,
consultation must include any air carriers and, to the extent practicable, other aircraft operators
using the airport.
AECOM will ensure that appropriate consultation occurs during the development of the NCP.
Task 16.2 Present Information to the Fort Worth City Council
AECOM will attend up to two (2) Fort Worth City Council meetings in order to present the progress
of the study. The first presentation will occur following the completion of Task 13, the second
presentation will occur following the completion of Task 15. Handout packages will be prepared
for distribution to the Council. AECOM will prepare the handout and provide 20 hard-copies and
one electronic (PDF format) of the handout to Council. This task includes two
three-day/two-night trips to Fort Worth by up to two Consultant staff.
Task 16.3 Hold Open House Public Information Meeting
One open house Public Information Meeting will be held to inform the public about the Part 150
Study, the development of the Noise Compatibility Program for AFW, and to obtain comments
from the public. The open house meeting will be an informal format and will provide an
opportunity for the public to see exhibits about the Part 150 Study, visit with Consultants and staff,
learn about the Part 150 process, and provide their comments. The public meeting will be
conducted to present the findings of Tasks 12 through 15 and a thorough presentation of the
findings and their significance will be available for public review.
AECOM will prepare up to twenty presentation boards for the Public Information Meeting. A
handout will be prepared to present summary information to the public. Comment forms will be
provided for individuals who wish to submit written comments. AECOM will prepare the handout
and comment form and provide 100 black and white hard-copies and one electronic(PDF format)
of the handout and comment form to AFW staff. Up to five Consultant staff will attend the Public
Information Meeting.
AECOM will prepare a camera-ready Display notice for publication in The Fort Worth
Page 18 of 23
Star-Telegram to announce the time and location of the Public Information Meeting. AECOM will
arrange for publication of the public notice at a size of approximately 3 columns by 6 inches. The
public notice will be published once during the week preceding the meeting and once on the
Sunday preceding the meeting. AECOM will obtain proof of publication from The Port Worth
Star-Telegram for each publication of the public notice. AFW may choose to publish the public
notice in additional area newspapers at their expense.
AFW will be responsible for arranging/providing for the necessary facilities for the public meeting.
AECOM will be responsible for providing easels, presentation boards, and AIV equipment.
Task 16.4 Hold Public Dearing
Following the completion of Task 15, a Public Hearing will be held to present the final
recommendations for the Noise Compatibility Program, and to obtain comments from the public.
Comment forms will be provided for individuals who wish to submit written comments. The Public
Hearing may be held during a regularly scheduled Fort Worth City Council meeting or in another
venue as deemed appropriate by AFW. If appropriate, AECOM will arrange to have a court
reporter present at the Public Hearing to transcribe verbal comments from the public. Up to two
Consultant staff will attend the Public hearing.
If appropriate, AECOM will brief the Fort Worth City Council regarding the Noise Compatibility
Program, prior to the Public Hearing.
Copies of the NEM and NCP documents will be placed in appropriate Fort Worth public libraries
and the AFW Administrative office prior to the Public Hearing, for the public to review.
AECOM will prepare a camera-ready Legal notice for publication in The Fort Worth
Star-Telegram to announce the time and location of the Public Hearing. AECOM will arrange for
publication of the public notice at a size of approximately 3 columns by 6 inches. The public notice
ad will be published once during the week preceding the meeting and once on the Sunday
preceding the Public Hearing. AECOM will obtain proof of publication from The Fort Worth
Star-Telegram for each publication of the public notice. AFW may choose to publish the public
notice in additional area newspapers at their expense.
Task 16.5 Compile and Analyze Public Comments
All comments received on the Part 150 Study, including letters, comment forms, and oral
transcripts will be compiled and analyzed. Responses will be drafted as appropriate and
provided to AFW staff for review and approval. A summary of the comments will be included in
Section 1Z Consultation and Public Participation, and copies of all comments will be included
in an appendix to the Noise Compatibility Program. Postcards, up to 50, will be mailed to all
parties who submitted comments, to let them know their comments were received and included in
the study.
Page 19 of 23
TASK 17 NCP REPORT PREPARATION
Sections 12 through 15 will be compiled and formatted to create the Noise Compatibility
Program, which will be submitted to FAA for their consideration under Part 150. Four versions
of the NCP document will be prepared over the course of the study. Quantities of each version
are estimates of AFW's needs. The cost estimate is based on the quantities indicated below. If
additional copies are determined to be necessary, they will be printed and charged to AFW on a
per copy basis. In addition to the hard-copies, electronic copy (PDF format) versions will be
provided to AFW staff on a CD as indicated below.
Task 17.1 City of Fort Worth Aviation Department, Affiance Airport, and FAA
Preliminary Review Document (NCP Version 1)
Version 1 of the NCP will be prepared and submitted to City of Fort Worth Aviation Department,
AFW, and FAA for their review and comment.
City of Fort Worth Aviation Department, AFW, and FAA will each be provided with three (3) hard
copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and MS word version on each CD. Comments and/or
mark-ups should be provided to the Consultant in either electronic or hard copy format, for
incorporation in Version 2 of the Noise Compatibility Program.
City of Fort
on vi
Aati
111 Document Distiributton Worth Worth
menFAA Consultant
DepaAFW
NCP Document (Hard Copy) 3 3 1
Executive Summary 3 3 1
NCP Document and Executive 3 3 1
Summary (CD)
Task 17.2 Fort Worth City Council and Public Review(NCP Version 2)
Version 2 of the NCP will incorporate the comments from the City of Fort Worth Aviation
Department, AFW, and FAA, and will be made available to the public and provided to the Fort
Worth City Council for their formal acceptance. Copies of the NCP will be placed in the public
library and the Airport Administration Office for the public to review. Copies will be provided to
the Fort Worth City Council in advance of the Fort Worth City Council meeting during which the
Fort Worth City Council acceptance of the document will be requested. The NCP Executive
Summary will be provided in hard copy and the NCP document will be provided on a CD for
distribution to the Fort Worth City Council. Hard copies of the NCP document will be provided to
City of Fort Worth Aviation Department and placed in the public library for public review. The
Consultant will send copies to the public library.
Page 20 of 23
City of Fort
Worth Avla lbr
Fv2Dor,umi�nt Distribution Worth
FAA Consultant
AFW _
NCP Document (Hard Copy) 6 0 1
Executive Summary 40 0 1
NCP Document and Executive 40 0 1
Summary (CD)
Task 17.3 FAA Formal Review(NCP Version 3)
Version 3 of the NCP will document the public involvement process, and be provided to the FAA
for their formal review and acceptance. Five (5) hard copies and five (5) CDs of the Executive
Summary and NEM Document will be provided for the FAA's review and comment The
Consultant will distribute the documents to various FAA Lines of Business as directed by the FAA
Program Manager.
City of Fort
V3 Documinnt Distribution Worth Aviation FAA Consultant
Department,
_ AFVV
NCP Document (Hard Copy) 0 5 1
Executive Summary 0 5 1
NCP Document and Executive 0 5 1
Summary (CD)
Task 17.4 Final NCP Document(NCP Version 4)
Version 4 of the Noise Compatibility Program will incorporate the FAA's Record of Approval,
and will be the final NCP document for the project. The Executive Summary will be updated to
reflect the public involvement process, FAA's approval of the NCP. Copies will be provided to
the City of Fort Worth Aviation Department and AFW for distribution as they deem necessary.
City of Fort
V4 DofiUa7 ent Distribution Worth AviationFAA Consultant
Department,
_
AFW
NEM Document (Hard Copy) 5 3 2
Executive Summary 25 3 2
NEM Document and Executive 25 3 2
Summary (CD)
Page 21 of 23
Page 22 of 23
AAO
§ \ �
-
§ 2 ° 99 § 3 & 2 It
m 9 .
In
2
§
LD
/ a a
P4
CQ
p 2 ge
2
(
) �
\ \\ � [» x §
. I
t t;
w ] 5353 as §
L9
\
§ ce
\ \
2 ] \ \ #
. §
2 / § § } z
f §
\ \
= E 2 ( } § E ) a
- § 2 % EE ! § § 7
_ �
) % �
p. 2
k
{ }
»
\�
E
E
$ /
` [ ems
" � E
8
§ )
« B « B
j § xxx
L4N � � )
\ \ § § \ j { \ ( e
E �
k \ \ \ ( \
f § ) § / § §
� k ® 2 ( Err2z22 § �
� m § 44 ] ¥ m / E ( )
j § ) ( > o
%§ \� \ % m
%$ \ ,
m ~ § B @ mto
@
/ ® / /\ K
U)
%
» » m _ m
� �
�
�
o
IL
\
) ®
LU
\ j co 0
0 $ 3 §
§ g 0 zco
§ 2 0 § §
§ � k \ § LLJ
\ u \ §
LU
0 § z \ \ \ LLJ z § < \ � y
z _ ° m / < U) \ §
§ ) o
2 CA
a C .
0 e
0 /
Ln \
<
o k $ 2 k R 8 \ S g
§ § \ m L6 k6 / § m 06 6 \ 2
LLJC ¢ q ® ® It / (Sen
�_ m �
0 § %e _ m
o c 3
/ > k
CAE
N m U
« -Le)-
LU\
a g
¥ 2 / y
2 2 CL
5 <\ § j
� \ & o e e
$ {
G \ IL m j Z ea
\ > \ y
/ \ L < � ) < E § @ / 2 §
§ \ Ln § z \ j } § j u
\ \ } ° ? / & 0 2 / k #
§ ° 0 § § § E
§ K k f / / § m w
± / \ \ % 0
�a k
d
) � +
k n 0
§
_
tr2 k /
) ^
Leo
\ /
\ § eoao ,
/
� q a
\\ k
§ \
\
J \
§
0
t § \ \
& aI < �
, ) 68 )
\
/ [ $
k � �
) § «
t ) ena ,
_
-
*
222 ■a
R
2 § � �
M & k
IR e , or
5
(� a \
( \ \
§ \ )
( §
. § §
■ 3Q �
±
F.
� / Ey
k \ �
Fort Worth Alliance Airport
PART 150 STUDY UPDATE
02-Apr-i 8
FEE PROPOSAL
Total
Cost
TASK DESCRIPTION
PHASE 1 -NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS UPDATE
1 MOBILIZATION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT $ 31,735
2 LAND USE MAPPING(OPTIONAL) $ 22,580
3 INVENTORY OF AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS $ 25,765
4 Forecast of Aircraft Operations(OPTIONAL) $ 19,302
5 Existing Noise Contours $ 20,340
6 Future Noise Contours $ 18,980
7 NEM Consultation and Public Involvement $ 23,061
8 NEM Report Preparation $ 46,795
9 Procedural Requirements to Limit Recover of Damages $ 3,680
10 NCP Determination $ 2,850
SUB TOTAL-PHASE 1 $ 215,088
PHASE 2-NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM UPDATE
11 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $ 27,105
12 OPERATIONAL NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES $ 22,720
13 LAND USE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES $ 18,120
14 Continuing Noise Program Measures $ 1,400
15 Noise Compatibility Program Recommendations $ 3,910
16 NCP Consultation and Public Involvement $ 75,250
17 NCP Report Consultation $ 37,610
I
SUB TOTAL-PHASE 2 $ 186,115
GRAND TOTAL-PHASES 1 &2 $ 401,203
to P N! 0 0 0 B O O N yGy G N N eOepp O O O�O�}} O O O P P O
N o�M.. W o N d b M M Q Q Q N Q M Q FOO M O Q O� [pi 6�i
+�.. � �NwM ��i9 W w W nN www ww� �wwN f9 wi9w� w N
v
N a N 0 0 0 d m O O O O N N O O P 6 0 0 0 0 N O O
� h M Vii Q w Q N N W N MMbiw�H Vi m•iR X49 w41 N49 w r G N
. y
4 x
9�
p p d O o
Q19 Or m .. cc O 0000Q .0000
vOVNNWO NMOQm
0 M Pa
O al li CIL
N 1�P to N'J; YI L6 N M N N 46,V t0.6 7 G6 O R w W m b M
� ��wN w�� wr w W N� i9wwwwN tH to w fn ON wN to iR� w W
O wo m N m 0 0 O a M 0 0 10 Q 4D N W V m N N a
� r r
O
O O m -00 pRd C 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 w 22wO O cc
ty wm� w ww H3wfR 194A 49 ei 4A to ww w f9 k9 19 �N
,y U
N_W
C 0-16 O
Q fi T
a
0 0 0 0 op d o e— 0 0 0�0 0 0 c.0000 o o e— 00
0-- ww v� X49 ssw en«» v4�N ww49co es�.n ocom 0r0i
m
a
O O O O O P
❑ p ww [7 rf 0000 000 000 000P- d d 0 0 0 O O
O9OMAwn d09w 90wOA
jti m
❑'d
<.2
U c -
L -
[Y F a o
0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O pO C cc
m 4» O f90 (O 49w m 4Awtg 4n W ww/90 O OM 490 O m w
m
MM wM ti �� OOi
�wU w w i9w i9w
to u�u_
IJ m qw� W m m � m m m 00 N N N N m m
N
N o
�O
0 0 0 0 9p O O O O ..[O[pp O O o O O p o p 0 0 0 0 O O
MM M MN Q owoo.
W
�4A K) f9 f9 49 !� fA u1 d3 f9 !9 i9 w U3 w m M 1 u3 w w
N _ _
a
pOtl' m P � m N
'-C1
0 0 0- o 0 o 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 �} 0 0 0 o o o.
N O m P Q m a m m m W E9 mo N m DD FA m Q Q N
O N r r N O a O O O O N O O on o N o1
Q w fA w M N a N N M N n' N m N'Ni N 10 R
Q. V3 fA w!s4 w w m f9 fA w fR fA w[A f9 tlf M a h
w
o m�'" m.comm �� co mom! cp cn mmQ mQ _
N W D r r j
o _
0 0 0 0 o o 0 ow
cocoa o 0
ooa 000 oopp ww000 w49op
m� d'V'm N Q m N M M m m N m o 0 o 9�- cO c O N Q M Q
O m m 4u N V w w N w N re N a r w
j� �wU f9 N}� �wN ) f9 69 ��f9w w49 Hw to
d � Q
O` {Q m tU N C m Q m
¢ ®_ t o 04 N M N M N N N u
�Z U
p o o o O O O O O PO O P P d d d 0 O o 0 0 0 O O
!+ N m� w.nw )4n wiA w f9 t9 4Ar w�f964m 49 fAM)dl
O
5.1. W
O CN-
¢a=L+
m
A
z
L O N 8
� aH
rW
a m
a
Q O E o W u d
¢ >
CU a cL
L) m z o s
Lu F-
U�� a io a c a n D
//// a n c n m o
VN O f/1 Vl F C W 2 m m y m U fq N s
QO a �"._ N 7 u m
V/ 0 O K O `m io ¢w a� O 1a o c
�a ¢ 0 EZ
h 0a 4 o ao c U� = u __ o z �� J
Lf) 00 e✓ r a o 3 o a u's S
't.a t LL a D Z o 4m O y y5 c mu m v�
U z O57
N ei� Q o ¢w m r a
L ` W -U a o ro ,�U z o U ; o o m U oa o 7
O W S Q N Z d O o m O u rn m U Z q E
(7 Q N 4 mea Zd W �rr6 �u_ciLLpoO WO �OwQO tau S
/^� Q Q T O r N QQ N N m p r N M Y N K N M V " N M W - N
CL i CV F^ ¢ r r J [V[V M M C/ 1�V?e e a W N
7
U
r N
p NO MtwIIpDo Wosli wceNn wNtH iONrR kOWfr.... O A WN 0O M .00 po P Ya3 r DIw O+h N O ON b i Oh 8
0P0 iO6PR5s bPNB aW1°?1
f
Or0a NA M n nN D i HCMmMWwsN a dWVw m1M.
u9 W 09 N 4A N M! ✓ �
U a
a
l0 O M O O P O D VI P
N'9 W 0 0 0 O N O V/O N D 6 0 0 OP
Y N yl Q O N�O O�PW m 'p i W � fR fR PW PN IA - N
a c en w w
a
4 K'
3 w
Q _ _
O O O O D O D O O O O D D D O pp pp b 8 0 0��O O O O O P
P b c w W b N M c0 h D Q N I N Q R Q A O CO b w N N c0 Q Q
y ry m a W M r O 00 00 I'i Q a N O N O O O V tls M 1�C9 9 M
N N V' r c N N VI 4i N V Q�V
Muni niV W m ri N Y3 W M O G 6i W!? N W lAw MfR IAM � tHMN f9�PNr ul N !D fA Y1 tRN N�
w �rW fA W M w w �wW rN N4A
� r r
O
S
O O D
Q!fl O M M N Cyy O D ON 79 p 5 w O O O O O P a d�0 0 0
Q d'10
j��g
A
N
—many
60 �O
E�= r
3 r
4 my°
a
0 0 0 0 0 o p p o P�a— a o— o p p P n d o D D D d o 0 0 0 0 0 opo a
O f9 0 w g q m D w Vi fA 0 0 fR fA 49 w M' 'N Dnp d O fA O O O�Op Ldp D
C m M MN N M �fA f9 N
E� w
D
0 0 0 O p SUMS V)d b_30 O-. 5 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 d O O D
Ax9 4A V}� w rA V32 64 M
N (9 N3M eq VS Vi fH fA t9 fA pM 4A MM N
w
• O R�U � M
q u
D- P. o
dz`L'
FD
KS
0 0 0 o d d o 0 2
FpIss ND D 00 0N{.0j t9 10(O fR 09 f9 Nsl N oNm o fO"d a o�O 0t0 0Nr wow H—w o 0 o mp mo!dFISH
Nc d e
N;n
0 0 0 p o p p O O
R! O f`V O R V i(D w ri M1 act!
O yy M 9 M +I N 0 0 0 0{U 0 0 0 0
o V b [+>O RO O _ _Q f�I�f`ti M
O a m D ✓f N M U}N[�]N Ln 0+1 d N 1(! M tYi!+i cn Q I[i
M 1n f9 9 !to Q fA w f9 9 f9 f9 w£R 4A FR� N M 9 1 M
N..-aN W.. o D000pm p
Q NDN �O Q N �'d'd'VQr NNNNW
b=
O O P 4 6 0 0 0 0 K alai, O O O O p d 6 d O O
c0(O Op PRISON
0 N w V[O W V N N W 0] cN-f r 0 ! m m til(O ID N m m d'V'Q
N N N P _ O Iq M O M d d 0 M O�-�-�-r n• b d b O N
ncinU ��w Nw% ivaw .w w ca iw es�w c �� uni fy i
� d
' 7 T� N N w 1� ✓� a �Q N N N N M 07 M f 0 � Q m
K
Ul Ll�O j
O O P
Mull
d 0 0 0 0 0 O D O
O t 0 0 N 0 0 4]O p P d O O 0 0 0 0 O 9 d O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r
N M M P M[O c0[h f� F r of rn Q V V Q N V V�N s} ID Q!D m!➢m 00 V V V d R
a�(J � °l F9 � aY � w wVi f9«i ��✓iM as M��f/303� fR S9 Vl t9M
a
w m W 7 o D w N[7N N a O� @ m m o0 V'6 @
[7 M r p
m� M
mF �
()
5--m—
'12__ O
_._-_n
N�
�D U
�x
Ilj �
� D C
W O w N R
❑ = W o 712
O Z f m D'D O
'� n ,c+ U N •' w Q m H.W 1 o Q
mail, w
UK;
r E E h a z q m a Rai-'
z `a u o d pq w w E F :° °' a '°d o m N « °-' q o
❑ - £ a tz n u £ 7 O w m Piz . R-91 . n n �. U w u
U+ 2 c � coc=�TD rn
U E `o.� 0 0. we E Z z a £ z m io E z a SU 'c0 C vz
w z H U ' Rai U £ F O w ° a °' ad
y� v U 3 N
❑ c U
� � za0 a` ❑ a a ¢ p' w w N M Z FNM " .4 [L FNM V 41 a �Nr�v,
v,
F Inti Zadrororororo a` z a a O .- g� U 2 zr Zr
U
) k \ \
0
Lu
a ,G !
■]L)
k)00
2 §f
\{\| �
00
ZE
kLU ;
U)0
) k \
2`\) Ij
)
-- —— 4
\ \ E
) )
§ Lo § ,
k \
k \
N O IO P d p Yl O Ow O O O O N N O O O O O d O tl a p off a l0 O 1(1
tl>r ti a M a O MIR O M4R ER ViN N W IRMM4R !R FANrRM O a h M M N
N M I!1 r r N N M M r O V�0
M M to
j�� bN4 NM b�9 6MR MM � NM I,y W rW M ui
o U
F-
pp op m
ron w big 609 voi�� fRw w01 �MfOR VOi� u❑sM w fOR
N
�O
��-,00 m'
d 0
'0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EO tl P P O O d 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
N E9 fflM MtAM M«ri bi fA fA lA fAN co� fR fR co fA 1p ER f9 E9 M M O m N N O
M W
G =_
io 0 0 o a o o- o
0
0
+-+ �tAw ER ua es ERMERw t»yr fnMMvi Mvi MI»«s v.rR lnweR ui IRM�� eR
C O N
�O
m
6 O O O O d O
Q �O
O O O� 0 0 0 O 4 p P O O O O u]u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Vl
O] f9 M+9 Eff vi bi E9 M fA f9 M fR M EA�� M Vf/9 M w f9 EA fR f9 M O P O O V NM
= O E9 M M fR fR
W n-I O O d O O O O
'O
a o
� I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o P P O 0 O(J d o 0 0 o e o
N N a l0 O r N V3 fR M M M 19 M M fA to to(H M E9 E9 699 1IAA fA 4A w M 4R M M
LA E9 O fR M� Vi IR d3 fA
Y �
6`L. _ ` IO[p O DD O W O i O O O
� O
N J
of
An p P O O O l0 O O N �OO O O O OLL O O 000 00000 O P o o P
f0[ti fn N ERN O M V3 b f9 Fn fR FR f9 f91 f9 fA M M M M Ffi 19 M M M fR FR Vi eR FR
`m m u vs in iR
U
�o
a _
0 0 0 a pp P o 0 o d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"o
N N a 10 FR 10 N MER N MER M fR fn tH N fiH f9 f9 en M E9 f9 t9M fA fRMMM M
v �
O _
++ O
W
O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 9 P 0 P n d O a 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O
O O O O MO p Ifl(fi o M[9Mf9 V3M 6949MMI9 MMMM W MER fR Ni fR M
C M _
-- o- - o�
J =
O S
0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
d W�� Ep MIO Otl E9 tR� Hi FR M fl Ili M 19 M E9 M tR Vi Vi Vi Vi fA IA!R M U1 M L] to
Lu
� r
� M
LL
N N S N N N N O P tl O
i
a c
a
N
Z
q�q N Y
K a
® w z a =
o Lu
w o m
e
fJ U) z '
ma _ mom
R' W y 3 Q n U C m 3 0 -:02:
N �
O X (7 w
OW O¢ O EO ° z Z o 3 a
® f9
Lo ti ® OF, [L
0 Q �/ p❑G Nri Qn dmm w❑ `6 Sy O�m NW�w dO oZ dA aWa Cs o
rc
° LLE
0. ;Ap 0 Z N 0
CL LLJ
E Z 1aF- Q OwOO O P! z
'
LL
N r N > r N M p r N 0 Q 0 K N M Q j - N M V r N m a .FlLU r
L.LL Y F� d I[1 n N o m W m woo
r N M -t 41 EP uM
{J O
�'e a eR W fO D v. [O �D fR[R•R f9 M tR M-kN W NlO O N M b O N 0 0 m O
F O T N iP ID O N r a N a W O N
a M N"'16 M M O n[ M a
M fig Vr fA M+A •4 � T M f9 M fR t9 !fl tR M t9 N �h ly fH f9 69 fR M M/9 E9 FA W �
6 0 0 0 0 0 O O ) O 0 0 0 0 O O O O b O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a O 0 O Gh
fR 1l)In fA!n Q '} p M fA f9!A M fA ffl fA i9 N N O IO O fl3 O�[l 47 O 4]O r YY M
U} W � Vr � !n�ffi 6M9 MP W 6N9
Q O O O O P b a O 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 0 a O
M q f/f9 F9 O +• A f9 Ayr f9 f9 fR fH fA M fH
Y E9 fA O fA E9 O M H!O O O N
In f0 a 1t1 N �i] N O O
N !A � V3 t9 M fA nj
� to
0000 otn w a P 0000 0000—'0 0 �n000�n0 000p0 Q o
yr f»�«fs yr h� � en f»f»f»u3 ua rA rnw at i4 N�fa�f»�M q 000� .� N
rn w r»es yr yr w
to w .r 4. rn N n N yr w fn fn fn ur.n e a
fn in fn en f»ua� rn
to fa
yr f9 M FR di M f9 M N
vi�
y �rh u}
M
0 0 0
V'm M Vi!A]ti `s W m fA fA[9 f9 E9 f9 4h V p N Ur (9!n ffl Vr Vr h c�
m f0 a N N m O V M rt1 M O
fR d3 :C1 fR d3 N MM w m
U3 `F M 4R fA M 4R �`
_ __ _ N
O
IL
d
O m O O O b O O O 4 4 O [] g q 0 0 O [] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ih
V fA!9 EA i} Y'} f9 fA fR f9 HT Ifl fA f9 sF off fR O tl1 ER EA E9 fA 6R
(9
fA FA eNA
to fA fR W M
_ b
p q q[] q a q O O O O O O O! O O O O P 9 9 O 4 P U n O O O b O
0 o ffr fn fn o W w o O f9
to M,f+r fn vrb.A fao 0 o f»a fn.9 fn f»fsr
fa cl oo a fo 0 fa o0 00
fR ER M Mi frr� dr
O
U
� m
O
F N ji
E �
„ a
a uy a w c d
M qE K }
w N
v a N W a m °d
v d 0 Luw c ac ly
N 8
Lu
cc
a x '
So O t`W�u C O Z p 'O D m C O U� c a o 15 a
V E r w z m h frs j O !q c , E �` w U, n y
r .2 m rn w a ¢ H ro v rn q W m E p °f o u> c v w j fq p H
> O n
5 E c a z 4 m a o: a m s s% o 3 E F o
0 o p m E LLIF m m o nE. v a o a Sv'i. ^°' m U 'm a o
S a v U O m . o W F > o a m o crn- m o to ¢ o
W d Z E c w °' �' m uci 9 �LL = 'cq ca' U _ p K
a s c a"' c O Q 4 " ,� z m m a z co o.T m U m LLL! H
� `m ry oz
O m y N m � u C o a n E c°. a LL¢Q m °-
m 10 o N p N W w n p w w U c (j z d T a o Q LL f� $
a 0 4 CI d 6 Q O W r N v+ Z N fn C a - N 1"J m a N m d'
N M a 10 U 2 a a N N N o b m o m Z IN IN i�fh
mom c6 ari ro a z a a O � � `.-' U Z 2
12
U
ATTACHMENT "C"
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT
Engineering Professional Services for
14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update
City Project No.
None
City of Fort Worth,Texas
Attachment C
PMO Release Date:05.19.2010
Page 1 of t
r�
r�
3
a
3
r
3
3
Hill
---TFR
----------------
-----------
r 3
LU 3
J
3
0 a
W 3
V) g
U
LU
O
0.
Z �
LU y
_ �3
Q �
a
z
o E
y
f3
E C c.
� °
o hoh a p a QQ SSryry =3 j `a v-���,JJ 2 9
O ���a D Q CJ O p n
z o.."z.. i.. ry m an- - -
�...rvig ry ry zm msgv d a caw az
a
YL
11/1412018 M&C Review
Official site of the City of Fort Worth,Texas
CITY COUNCT1 �A% CUW®A AT"ORT�TWORTI->
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 11/13/2018
REFERENCE 55AFW NOISE STUDY
DATE: 11/13/2018 NO.: C-28929 LOG NAME: UPDATE
CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC NO
HEARING:
SUBJECT: Authorize Execution of a Contract with CP&Y, Inc., for Professional Consulting Services
and Program Management, in an Amount Not to Exceed $592,687.00, to Update the Noise
Exposure Maps of the Title 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study at Fort Worth
Alliance Airport (COUNCIL DISTRICT 7)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a contract with CP&Y, Inc. for
professional consulting services and program management, in the amount of$592,687.00, to update
the Noise Exposure Maps of the Title 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study at Fort Worth
Alliance Airport.
DISCUSSION:
Fort Worth Alliance Airport (Airport) completed their first Title 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility
Planning Study in 1995. Since that time, the Airport has received numerous authorized amendments
to update the Noise Compatibility Program due to requests by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA). These amendments were executed in order to accurately represent the noise exposure
generated by the Airport as aviation activity expanded.
On March 3, 2009, (M&C G-16488)the City Council authorized the submission of the Airport's
revised Noise Exposure Maps to the FAA. The Noise Exposure Maps were approved by the FAA on
May 5, 2009,
On March 3, 2010, (M&C G-16863) the City Council authorized the submission of the Airport's Noise
Compatibility Program to the FAA as required by the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The Noise
Compatibility Program was approved by the FAA on December 1, 2010.
On June 26, 2018, (M&C C-28747) the City Council authorized the application for and acceptance of
a grant from the FAA in an amount up to $600,000.00 for a Part 150 Noise Exposure Map Update at
Fort Worth Alliance Airport. The FAA awarded the funds needed to complete the update on August
27, 2018 (City Secretary Contract No. 51202).
The purpose of this update to the Airport's Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study is to perform a Noise
Exposure Map Update. This will allow the FAA, the Airport, and the City of Fort Worth to determine if
existing Noise Exposure Maps are still valid and representative of the current noise environment at
the Airport or if updated maps resulting from changes in operational characteristics require updates to
the associated NCP.
AVIATION ADVISORY BOARD APPROVAL - On May 17, 2018, the Aviation Advisory Board voted to
recommend that the City Council approve this action.
MWBE Office: A waiver of the goal for MBE/SBE subcontracting requirements was requested by the
Department and approved by the MWBE Office, in accordance with the MWBE or BDE Ordinance,
because the purchase of goods or services is from sources where subcontracting or supplier
opportunities are negligible.
Fort Worth Alliance Airport is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 7.
FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION:
http://apps.cfwnet.orglcouncil_packettmc_review.asp?1D=26417&councildate=1111312018 112
11/14/2018 M&C Review
The Director of Finance certifies that funds are available in the current capital budget, as
appropriated, of the Municipal Airport Grants Fund. This is a reimbursement grant. Prior to an
expense being incurred, the Aviation Department has the responsibility to validate the availability of
funds.
TO _
rt
Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount
ID ID Year (Chartfield 2)
FROM _ _ _
Fund Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount
ID ID Year Chartfield 2
Submitted for City Manager's Office by- Fernando Costa (6122)
Originating Department Head: Bill Welstead (5402)
Additional Information Contact: Dakota Shaw (5407)
ATTACHMENTS
Form 1295 - Noise Study 180503.pdf
MC Map Exhibit.pdf
http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/mc_review.asp?ID=26417&councildate=1111312018 212