Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Contract 44743-CO49
if� TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0 b �p(Oc; CITY CHANGE ORDER NU CTf�% TARY 'r q Third Party Funding Notification Sheet CONTRACT NO. 44 743 . This form is used when the subject change order involves funding by a source other than TxDOT/U.S.DOT,and involves third parties who are providing funding under an Advance Funding Agreement or Donation Agreement. 1. Outside funding provided by: CCSJ: 0902-48-539 City of Fort Worth (Outside Entity's Legal Name) Project: BR 2006(132) 2.Type of outside funding agreement for this change: Highway: CS Fj� Existing ❑ Amended ❑ New County: Tarrant (Check one] District: 02-Fort Worth 3. Indicate the type and amount of funding: Contract El Fixed Price(Lump Sum) (Estimated Amount ) Number: 08133013 F�, Actual Cost (a) Contract Items(Bid Items): $330,231.17 Use as needed: I hereby acknowledge notification of the modifications (b) E&C': (a)x = $0.00 covered by this Change Order. (c) Indirect Cost"": (a+b)x = $0.00 enter% Date 12/7118 TOTAL $330,231.17 4ei RT WORTH By RECOMM D Typed/Printed Name Susan Alanis Typed/Printed Title Assistant City Manager ctor,Transportation/Public Works Department *The percentage(%)for E&C(Engineering and Contingencies)charges varies from project to project depending on the contract amount of the project.Projects with higher contract amount will have the lower rate of E&C charge. For a specific project,E&C rate(%)can be derived from the cost of"Engineering and Contingencies"in the"Estimated Cost"of the project. `*Use the statewide district rate as established by Finance Division each year. This line 3(c)is for Service Project only, unless otherwise specified in the Advance Funding Agreement. See Stand Alone Manual Notice 98-2 for instructions. r vn �C ,LSO O Funding for this Change Order has been arranged: �\ � c TxDOT Representative Datej Typed/Printed Name: TXDOT Form 2146-AFA(Rev.09/2010)Page 1 of 1 Contract Compliance Manager: By signing I acknowledge that I am the person responsible... APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY for the monitoring and administration of this contract, ® ............ 7 /'H,({ (�.?,d��� ensuring all performance and reporting requirement � A r 0 119ry a Douglas W. Black �„ •°s �y n1 A � p Michael Weiss,P.E. I '. ® Sr.Professional Engineer "C v Title 19"l iqi� 4 Q E Q1 J N � U N j x, � U _ ° C O .D f 8 = aQ m m a) r m m ° O ° C - N U- U- U 10 r ❑❑❑❑ O C r 00 T N a) N U m c 6i c s N O a D ° E C L ~ U w U H m O :3 u � >` > o° co O o _ cE � rnU m O ° ` m � Q Q L c w mo o m m x t pHm� WLNW N O (n cu 0 j Co y O Lf ❑❑S❑ O O W � C N m co @ z LU U 0 w a � U o m U ui U_ a) w W c so C x C O w w of O O m m » > Q CL 4) w W O C U` L _C n 0)w r _ !n ~ O -0 'a C C a) C) CO 'p :3 N 'y C C 4) C w i m a) Lj 'u z U m m w D7 O m - N d m O a) 'w'' C L C C) 0I C:- � Q > a ui 8 E o � i z m U M m w m c :: _ w QL) 0 3 co mC L < -o w rn m w E 0_ �_ c v v U O ¢ C N C w m O O D M m 0 C C L pwo _D > � E - .m p U m "' U >O N CO m v m m c c n m 3 m z t N > 3 o 0 CmL m c c ° to m O O > � co °:3 Mop-c mU) a w a) a) . m a) E o ' CL c caW m W v m wm e) .o Z Z WZ W w O C L ® d C Q U C ` } m O z 0 v E a) Z a w o a) a) U W z D: O z w 2 d f0 > V m a) "L'.' .. m EO m C N T in c N U m o W N O w w w 2 w > D LU (D w c $ m @ cp cn � w c M � a) c� c � E E -o m o 3 m c o c n Q CD Z Y .0) 3 C L C (DO m N >. = Q O O - E E a) b w \ O m ro O -mp a) V U 3 w 5j N o Cp U co @ > ` c) C7 0 m p C O m J 7 t S a) m C N m H L E m 3 7 cmm C �+-=p j O Z C 00m V p V m E 7 O O `p UL6 w -mp O m L_ a) m -,-5 O a) Q C o m m m 3 coo c m O N w Z - CO z = 3a C w c p p- ` O J � C of 0w a. - o L >+ p- a) a) ui N L o X O X O w o cLH - EwLw. E C) w m U z o m CD c p o o - C E o CL m O a) z o Eu=i °° 03o Q >. - CUo -c oy o o Q w aa) -0 - oN m CU m a) H � ) } a w m c d w o m _ s Q rn c1°o rn cli m W Q �_ rn ` E E o m v 0 � -wp m w w o 6 M co co rn rn z o Q x c i0 c) C a) ` U o c c O` o = w A' �n io 1- co co co co Q r) V E o Lp E E o p c c w In F W co 0 m a0 O) O) O) N d N a. w Q 0. �N 1- V O m w a) c m t� fn N N M 't 7 N N C) 0 } p Z' C. w 2 0 0 7 m@ L O C E a) z i 0) ao Q M O M > ~ a) w o v c 0 � > '� y m O a) � p C) m o t» t» c» c» m ts» z � O 0 CM D o c c d o 0 > c E v N Q E C U. O () a) w 0 0 .5 U Lu O ~ a) Na)'0 M 0) o cn c mm `E o cc Ca —Lwo wZaz w oO . 0 M 11 zw °2 " � O CW Z � ~21 z o 11 W a O LO � � V QwOc: c4 °0C) m U- OO 0 a O w m w W 0. Q� w W LLI m I� (o0M xL O 1 p � F- NV L) n U w m 4) CC :p O co NQ LU w -j m . ¢Ma (prnLua H (1)i m aN � a)LUUwc Z O Q 00 t69 tt? t!3� Z om w W a) .c W 0 a OZ Ix Q Lu O O O M op iL ) z Z v Q Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 c LU w LU LU ai E -0 o `o C w a) CO) -0 rn_0 m o U fA a7 N C C O O n 'a a) 'O U co Xw in . N U co a1 a) c Z 0. p a) a) U v� a) L " O O O Z O ujU a) F- c E p M a) it W W F- > Z Z j a) -2Z U W o w X � O w O ai V F- ~ -°'o N LU 3 w M = aE o 0 o LL E O !� U C C N O a) 'O N � O) o a7 W W W W w Q Q Q Q m O O O O E m 'm w U 'O c C a1 a1 C C �p C C L M U a) o 3 o c 0 m (u m `o OC U Co f�0 y c C ON U a a) EEp L-. U a) O "2N J O O 111 W Q D) `O F N m Z F N U 2 > P O W W m do U W W W W F- H : a) Z Z Z_ Z_ rn m C H (9 (9 E m m 0O a a w w 0)L �p U W W W W w a a m o a)a) H m Q O Z U w M O O N N M = Q F- Cl) O M l4 � d O 3 � o LU z F- z O O D U o O to a S � F- W 0 W fD z Q 2 U 0 W F- d, O o d > d + W C7 ir O � O 00 z w W F- U o 0 Z 2 o ir a W Cl) C9 0 zM Q Cl) S � U 2 p � p v � J a W O rn o 0 0 W U z (D O Q � F- .E cow U D U U)LU U m 0 O a O O N z M M U IA U 00 Go 00 W tt tt N N O O O U LU O O o ~O � Q W O o N 2 D F_ LU m z W o0 U U z J ~ N Q Q U O 0 m U ca z o 0 m ca a rn 17 � M m N z p Ix M W M p E!3 Q' O w a z Q x U C 7 O E Q co O OI d U Y O O) coM co � J N Q o U o Q J y W O p 7 aI O O cn a` c� Of z Y z z O 7 0 U- r % q$ \qLO 2 k Ld 1% k % k E k ® Cl) k < ® ® ® 2 C) $ @ $ 2dto e f t Cb G \ 2 k fn E >1 c R \ 0 / n 0 c '0 a � = c @ e ek m§ 0 & ' m e i @ t 0 m 3 G E ' .2 a 0 _ � _ w t 2in k Ci k Ci Ln C C\f Ci ol g q U B q 2 v � p � ® 2 CVe IA ID e � k © @ -J BAF R t U) 2F 2 O Ra. © a w f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a M o $ O o . $ o o $ o $ $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w a O tC st v QV Q m " 0 0 v W Q O v O %00 to * r N in tD 01 Qt N w M W N w V N w W W .-1 00 p Qt m CO N t0 to r• tD sf W to Ot U to Q to O M to O; N t0 n N N G M W N .4 Q Q to d W 00 co Vt Do rn .-i M Ol Q t!1 � r Vf w Vf V► Vf V/ V< N vl uV V• t/1 Vr N to V► Vf V< N ` ril 'O O Q u c M o` y o o $ $ $ o 0 0 0 $ $ o g o $ g g 3 3 ti o coN N N N R V Go W C st to N Q tt O < cor y Y 00 g 7 y M Q _4 N N N N N N rl rl N N rt N N N N N N V/ H VL VT VF V/ 4A V< A/$. VF N V? V► inV/ M V} N Q s 9 .O c d C D O C 5 A to V/ m co Z rOv m 1 � N eov rMi rnv fn m Ln m m m -4 r4 m N O a F°- aT 3 Sc ri o W d 3 M " c r Ln u a ° tntntno .Kvvory � omoorna000 Q R W 0o m it $ to q N O rry to N o 00 t0 to c N N M T to t0 O to N O' O N W V t6 tb to ? tp M Ot y � t0 4 o to O A N .-1 to O 01 N ry 0 'D 01 N v $ in O O O aD Q O 00 r• tD O1 .-1 O� a1 M N rr to y E N tD W r1 Q rl lf1 fr1 Ol ti Q u u N V► w V< V1 VF V) VT V1 V) � N � VF N VM H V1 V> N L r > C � O 'fl � > A N N N O 00 N t0 d' to O to M to .-1 f• N N N r N tD O N M to C N V1 In C O ID W M R W Ln A N .ti M Q �' tri -4 W tr1 O tC tG O C VMf N r1 .4 N 1A rV ..4 N r'n „NN N M N N m t^ � N = 0l V1 V1 N V) 1!1 N V► V1 Vy V} V! V? N in Ea .3 Q O Q .4 W Q .4 to N Ql 10 Ln Ln Ct r. O to M r. O .-4 r4 -W 0 W Mr, O m � O R ao to coypv�� tO N M 0% U, .Z N fn -4 N N N N N M M Lm M m .4 � O-4 M N M {Q 00 N M N 01 p .-1 VI V► V} V► x E _N u v v a E cE 'Q^ o OC O Ol O `.' �. q U.ILn C 3 0C Y S S S r C V m N O O (� L, rj A W O Qt > mroi E � ootonwv -WQu Eic3mroi � o1Oo � d c e o LA Q tv .. coU to c M M ` p e r A m rn ', ', m V CO `� r O E $ M y r r y > M O ■ O QmuuuuuutMomuLn mca uu 61 m _ to o , E s a a o o °; r � " co a A Z.- u r u u O L Q m R ° u � 2 ; cam = c " z z 4 m G Q Ou c O >. m m— X 4 atoac e-1 N M R Vt til r` co m O .-� N M S Ln w h 0o of rl �-1 rl ri ''l H H N eti rl Ll 1 0 HAYDON November 18, 2016 Texas Department of Transportation 2501 W. Euless Blvd Euless, TX 76040 Attn: Mr. Minh Tran, PE SENT VIA E-MAIL RE: Delay Claim #05—Stream Lining under Bridge Texas Department of Transportation ("TxDOT") Tarrant County Precinct Line at Walker Branch (the "Project") Haydon Building Corp ("Haydon") HBC#: OC-0902-48-539-21-0010-059 Dear Mr. Tran: Haydon requests compensation for construction impacts due to the delay in the decision on the lining method to replace the gabion mattresses under the bridge. This delay impacted the project beginning on May 26, 2015 until the Phase 1 Bridge beams were set on September 1, 2015. The net result is extension of the project by 48 days (corrected for period within previous delay claims). This requested extension is due to the inability to continue work on the Phase 1 Bridge while a decision on what was truly occurring in the stream beneath was made. Haydon is requesting the following compensation: • Compensation for additional project overhead, calculated using the 6% rule. • Compensation for inefficiencies In and idle equipment(including operator) • Compensation for 2.4 months of additional cost for bid item 5022001 —Barricades, Signs and Traffic Handling Based upon the attached supporting documentation, Haydon request a change order increasing the contract time by 48 days and the contract amount by $442,430.80. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 214.437.6963. Sincerely, HAYDON BUILDING CORP �.14rll Bill Tipton Senior Project Manager 6200 Springwood Drive,Suite 230 Irving,Texas 75063 Tel: 972-739-6405 Fax' 972.284-1922 UC oa ROCICOM.NI ADC WM u oaa❑ w r m � u is C e F �CO+Oi7+ = ' C@00lw❑ F O a m tj W uj ii < 4 to N o h a g Z � O mW Z = aWo cIto P � � IL < � z ie L O � � z W 's cu « oo"i Z x V d O U C7 (7 Z Z i= `a < _ ryt4. oa�o ? tj Vci ^' ob1ppeO� � tp �O W O �J �fC,*; O�i QNi 0 }n14 aa � ~�! � m � Q W W 4 Q I � Ov tuiatut < n < IL tui L) 0 � < m N w < o c g o I � t � CE lu 9 aa Iul � 3 r p 09 � p 1 0 W o � 8 FA m 8 B E Em �� � � � a•a � M 12 m o d E z < 9 � � E o s 56 Fig xin y �Zay�j � mp m bum 7 m e w ji v 0 a 0 9 0; �dlo v 8 � 9R .8 a < pm � v a �• � E lei W O _ Q $ 71 cF mm � � 0 °�° " o C � DO d' 0QNNNN Z Z �1 • � . k § � 2 $ §{ §/ � � k B - § � � � ■ a E & a ® E z § § § § � � § � ■ � � � A 2 0 ■ o � 8� 2a hk � L Ef � - � ■ $ � � _ § 0 e \ § © § 2 2 $ z z z ■ ■ z o o t & & ■ « � � O N O d W cq m N Z � � O) ku9 O LU a Z t V 7 O E a sc a+ ee a J W a E z Y v � • i NO GABION MATTRESS GABION TOE (1N PLACE) OVOR DEEPER TO TOP OF LIMESTONE i R I DHAP t5TONE PrIOTECTIONI i- (36") I -- NUEUDING MATERIAL f9"l FILTER FABRIC STONE PROTECTION RIPRAP TOE WALL DETAIL OPTION 2 - STOKE PROTECTION RIPRAP NO GA910N MATTRESS EDGE OF ITiYP) ADDITIONAL C1IANNEL 3.X3, z GABIONS - GAS 10111 \ ( \-FILTER FAMI C TOP OF \ (TYP) LIMESTONE k GABION TOE 1� (1N PLACE) KEY GABION INTO LIMESTONE OPTION 3 - ADDITIONAL GABIONS In 8200 Springwood Dr Suite 230 Irving, TX 75063 Office 972-739-6405 Request for Information RFI #: 67 RFI DATE: 04/14/15 TO: Chuck Putnam DATE REO BY: 04/17/15 TxDOT IMPORTANCE: URGENT PROJECT#: 0902-48-539 PROJECT: Tarrant County CS LOCATION: Walker Branch SUBJECT: 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress SUBMITTED BY: Josh Courcy COMPANY: HAYDON BUILDING CORP INFORMATION REQUESTED: SHEETS REFERENCED.: Due to the location of the water table in the creek, the ground upon which the gabion mattresses would rest on is unstable and would not provide adequate support. Would it be acceptable to replace the 18" gabion mattresses with the 36" stone protection along the bottom of the channel? Please advise and provide written directive on how Haydon is to proceed RESPONSE: The proposed alternative is not acceptable.However,Please submit a proposal to replace 18" gabion mattress &36" rock riprap surface with articulated concrete block(ArmorFlex,ShoreTec or equal-provider to submit sizing calculations/info). Additional direction regarding adequate support:Excavate unstable material(approx 4'to shale) and replace with 36" rock riprap per plan specifications.Above this layer,install riprap bedding per manufacturer's recommendations(large enough to not escape openings in geotextile). Follow guide detail IACB and specifications attached. Final material selection and sizing information shall be submitted by Contractor to Engineer for approval. ..�. TQP TRENCH ANCHOR DETAIL STANDARQ 3zISLOPE DETAIL _eom,n BOTTOM TRENCH ANCHOR DETAIL STANDARD-2 -1 SLOPE DETAIL t / `�•%` ! GRADE CHANGE DETA1l �'iem,aevr,ar a An.¢arprm INTERLOCKING ARTICULATING 1,tv..r.n..•.�•,....rwt tr••a,� CONCRETE BLOCKS SIDE TRENCH ANCHOR OETAK r.�•.+„+..Y•«.r«•.••• ..Y•. .... .•w•«... IACS •.tn t.• C 1 � J;J- CHANNEL DETAIL Lm�• I.x..s.s..Yr..••ir Ls......,«.. Ln••r t•� IH�.. �• � p.,.r:K Lsv�«..1 y,r.i^Cn[•.�•s.«.. .R.fa w f' r mo..t..i•t.iR S J 1 [wr.• i•�rFi`w f~i:°f ,� �.�� �w%tri r � 1tutJp l.1 iWt W b6 Kb Rl•:L CABLE DETAIL FOR USE WITH CABLE DESIGN ABUTTING EXISTING CONCRETE DETAIL uLr L n I Af T..=Llep�raer �rdbyortdtm INTERLOCKING ARTICULATING +•If. -nr.w.....«.•r e••al 4 CONCRETE BLOCKS d.«.f r•.s..vw sR 1.t.••..r.• ,..•fs..a t.«v...Iw s... IAC9 ur1 b i y.•,. ... /'.. 4'=4 �,r� """tis "`t �`t`1 I. t•--�I�_ i r,� » SIT 1� ( I �`I'��(,�1'" �I I� I��•i�.�.__,� «<.vw .y :.f� o. t.• \`'�'«c�� w.:.: ��•rM� w � t..1. I "•�•s.: :�.Na.s .1..�.... T: •• Ids.— PLAN rly . PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW a... r..• t.a`.e ..r• ^C / r..i / i:'�'c�i^o;.v:•I.w.• e...q t� .1 w. iw.rri.' : .t.• 7. r�.N PIPE OUTLET DETAIL 1 _PIPE OUTLET DETAIL p fair f d� rt rum tm:f�r y rnorrofna e� INTERLOCKING ARTICULATING r• — -�w•^ «• CONCRETE BLOCKS w« tACS 2004 Specifications SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 4022 Interlocking Articulating Concrete Blocks 1. Description. Furnish and install dry cast concrete interlocking concrete blocks and geotextile fabric underlayments to provide an erosion control matrix. 2. Definition. Interlocking Articulating Concrete Blocks. Adjacent concrete blocks that fit together in such a manner that they cannot be laterally pulled apart in any horizontal direction. The blocks lift vertically to disengage them from the adjoining blocks. The blocks are held together as a result of the geometric shape of the blocks, without using cables or other accessories. 3. Materials. A. Interlocking Articulating Concrete Blocks. Use Interlocking Articulating Concrete Blocks(IACB)that expand and contract. Provide individual grid blocks consisting of a homogeneous mass of consolidated concrete. Ensure they are machine-made by a vibration and compression process and are composed of approved aggregates with a no-slump concrete mix. Use mix water that is clean, fresh,and free from oil,acids, soluble salts,and organic impurities. Use cement conforming to ASTM C-150. Use test procedures conforming to ASTM C-140. Use aggregates conforming to ASTM C33. When potentially reactive aggregates are used, replace 25 to 35%of the cement with a Class F fly ash meeting the requirements of the Departmental Material Specification DMS-8900,"Fly Ash"or replace 50%of the cement with Grade 100 or Grade 120 Ground Grandular Blast Furnace(GGBF)slag meeting the requirements of ASTM C 989. Use Type 11 cement in sulfate or salt-water environments. Ensure the manufacturer of the IACB furnishes the system's Hydraulic Stability Test Report that complies with the test procedures under the Federal Highway Guideline Report FHWA-RD-88-181 or FHWA-RD-89-199 to determine the system's critical shear stress value. Install the anchoring devices such as helix anchors,duckbill anchors, shear pins,cables, etc., used in the hydraulic stability test procedure in the field, in the same manner in which they were used during the hydraulic stability testing. Provide IACB's that meet or exceed the type stated in the plans. 1-4 4022 1-05 Provide IACB meeting the following physical requirements: Compressive Strength (min) 4000 IbsJsq. in at 28 days ASTM C 140 Water Absorption (max) 7% ASTM C 140 Specific Weight(min) 130 lbs.per cu. ft. ASTM C 140 Minimum Critical Shear Stress 4 lbs. per sq. ft. or as shown on the plans Percentage Open Area As shown on the plans Prior to installing of the blocks, submit the following product information for review and approval of equivalent blocks: (1) Block Dimensions(L,W,H) (2) Block weight and submerged weight (3) Block moment arms(for use in calculation of block stability factor of safety by FHWA NHI 01-003, HEC 23, "Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures", Second Edition) (4) Block critical shear stress. rc B. Filter Fabric Underlayment. Use Type 2 filter fabric as defined by DMS-6200,"Filter Fabric",or of the type and properties as specified in the plans,or approved equivalent. During periods of shipment and storage,protect the filter fabric from direct sunlight, ultraviolet rays, and temperatures greater than 140°F. Keep the filter fabric in its protective covering. If the filter fabric protective covering is damaged or removed, immediately cover the filter fabric with an opaque tarp or move the filter fabric to an indoor storage facility. 4. Construction. A. Earthwork. Construct the areas where placing the filter fabric and IACB's to the lines and grades as shown on the plans. Where such areas are below the allowable grade, place and compact these areas to grade in layers not exceed 8 in.of the selected material. Use the depth of layers and amount of compaction necessary to obtain a density equal to the adjoining undisturbed soil. Remove obstructions, such as but not limited to, roots, lumps,and projecting stones larger than one inch. Remove soft or low-density pockets of material and fill the resulting void with select, compacted material. Use a compaction of 90%or greater of the optimum value as determined by Test Method Tex-114-E. Construct the finished sub-grade to exhibit a raked, rolled,or otherwise smooth planer profile within 0 in.to 0.5 in.tolerance within a 10 ft.straightedge from established sub-grade elevation shown on the plans or as approved by the Engineer. Immediately prior to placing the filter fabric and the IACB, Engineer will inspect the prepared area. Do not place filter fabric or blocks until the Engineer approves that area. Prior to placing blocks, perform any necessary repairs to the finished grade at no expense to the Department. 2-4 4022 1-05 t - B. Placing Filter Fabric. Place the filter fabric directly on the prepared area.Overlap the longitudinal and transverse joints a minimum of 2 ft. Insert the securing staples,as needed, through both strips of overlapped fabric along one line through the midpoint of the overlap to temporarily hold the filter fabric panels in place until the IACB can be placed. Place only 200 ft. or less of filter fabric before covering with the IACB. If the filter fabric is installed and not covered with the IACB for more than two days, lift the blocks and inspect the surface of the slope for slope defects. Lift uncovered filter fabric after a heavy rainfall and inspect the area for slope damage. Place the filter fabric directly on the prepared area. Place the fabric smoothly on the subgrade minimizing tension,stress, folds,and wrinkles. After placing,do not unnecessarily walk on or disturb the filter fabric unless required to preserve contact with the subgrade. Do not allow equipment on unprotected filter fabric. Protect the fabric from binding, clogging,tears,and other damage while installing. Place the filter fabric strips from downstream to upstream. Overlap successive filter fabric sheets such that the upstream sheet is placed over the downstream sheet or the upslope sheet is placed over the downslope sheet. Overlap adjoining fabric sections a minimum of 2 ft. Replace or repair, at no additional cost, fabric damaged while placing the blocks, as directed. Repair all torn, punctured,or otherwise damaged areas by placing a fabric patch of the same material over the area and extending it a minimum of 3 ft. beyond the perimeter of the tear or damage. Orient the patch material so that its fibers are aligned with the damaged filter fabric fibers. C. Placing Interlocking Articulating Concrete Blocks (IACB). Place the IACB individually on the filter fabric to produce a continually interlocking surface free from field seams and on non-interlocked connections except as approved by the Engineer,or as shown on the plans. Construct the IACB to the specified lines and grades shown on the plans. The Engineer will make final acceptance and approval of the installation. If shown on the plans, backfill the voids of the IACB with seeded and fertilized topsoil. Prior to placing the topsoil, inspect the concrete blocks for damage. Replace and grout individual concrete blocks which are cracked and which are reduced in individual block weight by one-third, prior to placing the topsoil. Excavate and prepare foundations for the IACB anchor trenches, toe trenches and aprons,top trenches, upstream termination trenches, and downstream termination trenches as shown on the plans. S. Measurement.This Item will be measured by the square foot as shown on the plans, complete in place. 6. Payment.The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item and measured as provided for under"Measurement",will be paid for at the unit price bid for —Interlocking Articulating Concrete Blocks",of the size specified. This price is full 3-4 4022 1-05 compensation for furnishing the materials. tools, equipment, labor, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. Furnishing and placing the topsoil. fertilizer, and seeding will be measured and paid for by the pertinent bid items. 4-4 40?? 1-05 Miftah Semane From: Alex Garcia <aig@freese.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:37 AM To: Weiss, Michael; Norman Robertson;Chuck Putnam; Miftah Semane Cc: Eric Friedrich (friedricher@hhresources.com) Subject: RFI#67 Response - REVISED Attachments: RFI#67 - 36 inch Stone Protection Riprap vs Gabion Mattress - REV.pdf,Houston IACS std,pdf;IACB - TOOT ss4022.pdf, Pages from 2014-spec-book-1114.pdf All, Based upon our field visit and additional follow-up internally and with the City, I have attached our revised response to RFI 67. Please have the contractor submit a proposal for replacing the 36"stone riprap and gabion mattress with articulating concrete block. I have provided guide details from the Houston District, but the contractor shall submit detailed manufacturer info for approval prior to installation, including details regarding anchoring. Alex Garcia, PE, PTOE Freese and Nichols, Inc. 4055 International Plaza,Suite 200 Fort Worth,TX 76109-4895 Direct:(817)735-7321 Blog:htto://www.freese.com/onward-upward This electronic mail message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message, together with any attachment, may contain the sender's organization's confidential and privileged information. The recipient is hereby notified to treat the information as confidential and privileged and to not disclose or use the information except as authorized by sender's organization. Any unauthorized review, printing, retention, copying, disclosure,distribution, retransmission, dissemination or other use of,or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error,please immediately contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of the material from any computer. Thank you for your cooperation. 1 8200 Springwood Dr Suite 230 Irving, TX 75063 Office 972-739-6405 Request for Information RFI #: 67 RFI DATE: 04/14/15 TO: Chuck Putnam DATE REQ BY: 04/17/15 TxDOT IMPORTANCE: URGENT PROJECT#: 0902-48-539 PROJECT: Tarrant County CS LOCATION: Walker Branch SUBJECT: 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress SUBMITTED BY: Josh Courcy COMPANY: HAYDON BUILDING CORP INFORMATION REQUESTED: SHEETS REFERENCED.: Dxie to the location of the water table in the creek, the ground upon which the gabion mattresses would rest on is unstable and would not provide adequate support. Would it be acceptable to replace the 18" gabion mattresses with the 36" stone protection along the bottorn of the channel? Please advise and provide written directive on how Haydon is to proceed RESPONSE- i Miftah Semane From: Aaron Debord <Aaron.Debord@aguirre-fields.com> Sent: Monday,October 19, 2015 9:26 AM To: Josh Courcy;Norman Robertson; Miftah Semane;Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; martin.phillips@fortworthtexas.gov;Weiss, Michael (Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov) Cc: Quentin Smith;Alberto Santiago;Jon Harshbarger, Mark Gribble;Jesse Loftin;Alex Garcia (aig@freese.com) Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options,Information Attachments: Sheet 126 Precinct Line.pdf Josh, The 6'x6' Dimension is only needed at the toe of the gabions. The sideslope of the gabions can be 36"deep. Please see sheet 126 attached. At the exposed edges of riprap protection 6'x6'toe is specified. Exposed edges are where riprap meets natural ground. Thanks, Aaron S. DeBord, P.E. AGUIRRE & FIELDS LP 12999 Jess Pirtle Blvd. Sugar Land, TX 77478 (281)207-2061 (Direct) (281)340-8900(Main) From:Josh Courcy[mailto:jcourcy@haydonbc.coml Sent:Friday,October 16,2015 3:35 PM To:Blake<norman.robertson@txdot.gov>;Miftah<miftah.Semane@txdot.gov>;'Chuck.Putnam@txdot.gov' <Chuck.Putnam@txdot.gov>;Hector Canales(Hector.Canales@txdot.gov)<Hector.Canales@txdot.gov>; martin.phillips@fortworthtexas.gov;Aaron Debord<Aaron.Debord@aguirre-fields.com>;Weiss, Michael (Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov)<Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov> Cc:Quentin Smith<gsmith@haydonbc.com>;Alberto Santiago<asantiago@haydonbc.com>;Jon Harshbarger <jharshbarger@haydonbc.com> Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Aaron, In addition to the toe of the 3x3 Gabion baskets,are you wanting Haydon to install the 36"Stone Riprap around the remaining edges of the Gabions(Le side slopes) at the 6'x 6'dimension? Thanks, Josh Courcy Project Engineer (DHAYDON HAYDON BUILDING CORP 8200 Springwood Dr. Ste 230 Irving,TX 75063 972-739-6405 main 469.507-1457 cell 1 www.haydonbc.com fac book I twitter I linhoin From: Mitchell Robinson Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 12:35 PM To: Josh Courcy Subject: FW: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Thanks, Mitchell Robinson Project Manager (DHAYDON HAYDON BUILDING CORP 8200 Springwood Dr.Ste 230 Irving,TX 75063 972-739-6405 main 214-952-8339 cell www.haydonbc.com tacebook I Wfier l linkedin From: Chuck Putnam rag il,Ip<iuck.PutnamQtxdot=v_1 Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 8:16 AM To: Mitchell Robinson Cc: Norman Robertson; Miftah Semane; Hailu Ayalew; Hector Canales; Weiss, Michael; 'martin.phillips@fortworthtexas.gov' Subject: FW: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Mitchell, The city is good with the proposal#2,the channel grading will be performed under daily force account documentation. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Chuck Putnam Engineering Specialist TxDot NTCAO (817)399-4303 Office (817)205-7348 Cell From: Weiss, Michael email :Mi hael.Weis_s6fortworthtexas.�v7 Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 10:12 AM To: Chuck Putnam; Norman Robertson Cc: Miftah Semane; Hailu Ayalew; Hector Canales; Phillips, Martin Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Chuck, The City is good with Proposal#2. 2 Thanks, Mike Weiss, P.E. Senior Professional Engineer City of Fort Worth Transportation and Public Works Department Infrastructure Design and Construction 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth,TX 76102 (8 17)392-8485 Office phone (817)584-6441 Cell phone Michael.Weiss(cd,fortwortlttexas.gov How am I doing? Please feel free to contact my supervisor.Martin Phillip fbU=rthtexas.$av Cit},of Fort Worth— Working together to bttild a strong contntunity. FoRTWORTH. -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Putnam [mailto:Chuck.Putna txdot.sovl Sent: Monday, August 10,2015 9:49 AM To: Weiss, Michael;Norman Robertson Cc: Miftah Semane; Hailu Avalew; Hector Canales Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options. Information All, Please provide me with an update as to the status of this items of work. Is the City good with proposal#2? If you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me. Chuck Putnam Engineering Specialist TSDot NTCAO (817)3994303 Office (8 17)205-7348 Cell -----Original Message----- From: Weiss, Michael [mailto:Michael.Weiss@fomvorthtexas.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 05,2015 9:39 AM To:Norman Robertson Cc: Chuck Putnam Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information OK,thanks. -----Original Message----- 3 r � From:Norman Robertson [mailto:No n.Robertson@txdot.gov] Sent: Wednesday,August 05,2015 9:33 AM To: Weiss,Michael Cc:Chuck Putnam Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Yes. Using option#2 sent by Aaron, there will just be the gabion baskets on the slope,protected by 6 foot of 36" rock rip-rap. Other than that,they will grade the channel to flow properly and look good. We can talk about this further in the weekly 2:00 meeting today. Blake From: Weiss,Michael [Michael.Weiss a fortworfhtexas.gov] Sent: Wednesday,August 5,2015 9:15 AM To:Norman Robertson Cc:Chuck Putnam Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Blake, Are we eliminating the riprap in the channel? Thanks, Mike -----Original Message----- From:Norman Robertson [mailto:Norrnan.Robertson ct txdot.gov] Sent: Wednesday,August 05, 2015 9:11 AM To: Weiss, Michael Cc:Chuck Putnam Subject: FW: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Mike, If this is OK with the city of Ft. Worth, we'll give Haydon the "Go ahead" to start. Blake From: Mitchell Robinson [mrobinson@haydonbc.com] Sent: Tuesday,August 4, 2015 4:33 PM To:Norman Robertson;Josh Courcy Cc:Chuck Putnam; Miftah Semane; Hector Canales; Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov;Scott Jones Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Blake, Haydon believes the best way to resolve this issue is to proceed with installation of the 6'wide Stone Protection Rip Rap option around the 30 gabion baskets.There is an existing bid item that can be utilized to perform this work,and more importantly this will allow construction of the bridge and allow closing of Delay Claim#2. Haydon is prepared to start on this work immediately if TxDOT can provide a directive to proceed with this method.Also, any miscellaneous grading needed in the channel can be performed under the force account method. Please advise if TxDOT can provide the necessary direction to allow Haydon to proceed with construction of the bridge. Thanks, Mitchell Robinson Project Manager 4 HAYDON BUILDING CORP 8200 Springwood Dr. Ste 230 Irving, TX 75063 972-739-6405 main 214-952-8339 cell www.haydonbc.com facebook I twitter I linkedin -----Original Message----- From: Norman Robertson [mailto:Norman.Robertson@txdot.gov] Sent: Tuesday,August 04,2015 8:04 AM To: Mitchell Robinson;Josh Courcy Cc: Chuck Putnam; MiRah Semane; Hector Canales; Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov Subject: FW: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Mitchell, Here is what we recieved from Aaron Debord with Aguire and Fields yesterday for the creek bottom. Blake From: Aaron Debord [Aaron.Debord@aguirre-fields.com] Sent: Monday,August 3,2015 5:32 PM To:Norman Robertson Cc:Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; MiRah Semane;aig@freese.com; Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov; Mark Gribble; Brian Legaspi; Eric Friedrich;Oscar Aguirre: Mark Schluter Subject: RE: Precinct Line Channel Protection Options, Information Norman, Attached are exhibits for two possible options for replacement of the gabion mattresses if the mattresses can't be constructed in the channel. Option 1: Build as shown in the plans. Option 2: Stone Protection Riprap. Construct Riprap Stone protection at the current gabion toe. (6'x 6' for the length of gabions) Depth should be to the top of limestone. See attached exhibit. Option 3: Additional Gabions. Construct additional 3'x3'gabions at the current gabion toe. Depth should be to the top of limestone plus a 1' key into limestone.See attached exhibit. These options are a possibility and may provide the toe protection needed.They appear generally consistent with HEC-23 scour protection measures. The foundations were checked with the construction logs provided of foundation depth. The foundations have adequate depth into limestone to appropriately support the bridge with maximum expected scour to the top of limestone. However,there are a number of questions that remain unanswered regarding field conditions and limitations the contractor is facing. For example, if the subgrade is not suitable and they cannot dewater the excavation, how were they able to build the gabion toe of slope in the plans?And,how would they be able to build the toe design options 2& 3? Unless we understand the scope of their limitations, I don't know how we can offer firm recommendations on alternative design options for TxDOT to consider. AFLP and H&H Resources are willing to meeting in Fort Worth w/the contractor and TxDOT to gather information and explore the options further, if you believe that will help. Short of that,our recommendation remains to build per plans or to replace the gabion mattress with 36" layer of stone protection,as this remains an adequate design. We would request additional fee if requested to assist with development of alternate designs. 5 We can have personnel in Fort Worth this week for a meeting, if needed. Thanks, Aaron S. DeBord, P.E. AGUIRRE& FIELDS LP 12999 Jess Pirtle Blvd. Sugar Land,TX 77478 (281)207-2061 (Direct) (28 1)340-8900(Main) -----Original Message----- From: Norman Robertson [mailto:Norman.Robertson@txdot.gov] Sent: Monday, August 03,2015 11:46 AM To: Aaron Debord Cc: Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Miftah Semane;aig@freese.com; Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov; Mark Gribbie Subject: RE: Precinct Line Foundation Depth Log Request Thank you. From: Aaron Debord [Aaron.Debord@aguirre-ftelds.com] Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 11:34 AM To:Norman Robertson Cc: Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Miftah Semane;aig@freese.com; Michael.Weiss@fomvorthtexas.gov; Mark Gribble Subject: RE: Precinct Line Foundation Depth Log Request We are getting a response answer and will send today. Aaron S. DeBord, P.E. AGUIRRE&FIELDS LP 12999 Jess Pirtle Blvd. Sugar Land,TX 77478 (281)207-2061 (Direct) (281)340-8900(Main) -----Original Message----- From:Norman Robertson[mailto:Norman.Robertson@txdot.gov] Sent: Monday, August 03,2015 11:17 AM To:Aaron Debord Cc:Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Miftah Semane;aig a freese.com; Michael.Weiss@fomvortlttexas.gov Subject: RE: Precinct Line Foundation Depth Log Request Aaron, Do we have any word on the creek bottom?Or and estimated time on when we'll have a plan? Any information is appreciated. Thanks, Blake From: Miftah Semane Sent:Thursday,July 30, 2015 2:31 PM To: Aaron Debord Cc: Chuck Putnam;Norman Robertson; Hector Canales Subject: RE: Precinct Line Foundation Depth Log Request 6 Aaron, Please find the attached information as your request. Please let me kno%v if you need any more information. Miftah Semane Engineering Assistant TXDOT, NTAO. 2501 West Euless Blv. Euless,TX 76040 miftah.semane@txdot.gov (214)718-3610 Cell From: Aaron Debord [Aaron.Debord@aouirre-Felds.com) Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 2:42 PM To: Miftah Semane Ce: Norman Robertson; aig@freese.com; Chuck Putnam: Hector Canales; Eric Friedrich (friedricliercalifiresources.com) Subject: Precinct Line Foundation Depth Log Request Miftah, Could you please get me a copy of the construction log for bridge foundation depths/elevations already constructed for Phase 1 bridge. The depths/elevations at top of limestone is needed as well. Any information on this would help determine the appropriate design for the channel. This information will confirm our boring log data, help verify foundation design, and solidify our scour design recommendations. We have confirmed with our boring lob data that groundwater occurred at approximate elevation 485 when the holes were drilled years ago. Thanks, Aaron S. DeBord, P.E. AGUIRRE & FIELDS LP 12999 Jess Pirtle Blvd. Sugar Land,TX 77478 (281)207-2061 (Direct) (28 1)340-8900(Main) -----Original Message----- From: Miftah Semane [mai Ito:Miftah.Semane txdot.gov] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 5:13 PM To: Aaron Debord Cc: Norman Robertson; aig@freese.com; Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales Subject: Re: Precinct line rd. : Flex-base under approach slab. Thank you Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 27, 2015, at 4:59 PM,Aaron Debord <Aaron.Debord@agu irre-f ields.com> wrote: > Blake, > Re-calculation of flexbase quantity for flexbase under the bridge approach slab: > 247-2100 FL BS (CMP IN PLC)(TY E GR 4) Phase 1: 719 TON Phase 4: 505 > TON 7 f, >Total:— 1,224 TON >The rate we used was for Cubic Yard, and should have been Cubic Feet. >The calculations are based on the approach slab geometry and the BAT-CTFB-08(FW)standard. >Thanks, > Aaron S.DeBord,P.E. > AGUIRRE& FIELDS LP > 12999 Jess Pirtle Blvd. > Sugar Land,TX 77478 >(281)207-2061 (Direct) >(281)340-8900(Main) >----Original Message----- > From: Norman Robertson [maiito:Norman.Robertson@txdot.gov] >Sent: Monday,July 27, 2015 10:03 AM >To: Aaron Debord >Cc: aig@freese.com;Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Miftah Semane > Subject: RE: Precinct line rd. : Flex-base under approach slab. > Thank you. > From: Aaron Debord [Aaron.Debord n aguirre-fields.com] > Sent: Monday,July 27, 2015 10:01 AM >To: Norman Robertson >Cc: aig@frcese.com;Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Miftah Semane > Subject: RE: Precinct line rd. : Flex-base under approach slab. > Blake, > We are looking at this and will get the quantity to you today. >Thanks, > > Aaron S.DeBord,P.E. >AGUIRRE& FIELDS LP > 12999 Jess Pirtle Blvd. > Sugar Land,TX 77478 >(281)207-2061 (Direct) >(281)340-8900(Main) >-----Original Message----- > From:Norman Robertson [mailto:Norman.Robertson@txdot.gov] > Sent: Monday,July 27,2015 9:59 AM >To: Aaron Debord >Cc:nig@freese.com; Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Miftah Semane >Subject: FW: Precicnct line rd. : Flex-base under approach slab. >Aaron, > Where are we on this? > Please advise. > Blake > > From:Alex Garcia [aig@freese.com] s > Sent: Tuesday,July 21, 2015 4:35 PM >To: Miftah Semane > Cc: Norman Robertson; Chuck Putnam; I•lector Canales; Aaron Debord >(aaron.debord a aguirre-fields.com) > Subject: RE: Precicnct line rd. : Flex-base under approach slab. > Miftah, >This is a bridge item. Please coordinate bridge questions through Aaron Debord at Aguirre & Fields. > Alex Garcia > 817-735-7331 > From: Miftah Semane [mailto:Miftali.Semane@txdot.go,v] > Sent: Tuesday,July 21, 2015 4:33 PM >To: Alex Garcia <aig@freese.com> > Cc: Norman Robertson <Norman.Robertson@txdot.gov>; Chuck Putnam > <Chuck.Putnam@txdot.gov>; Hector Canales<Hector.Canales@txdot.gov> > Subject: Precicnct line rd. : Flex-base under approach slab. > Alex, > I have a question on the estimate for the flex base which is going to be placed under the approach slab. The estimate calls for 46.3TON, but according to the detail on page 224 the flex-base should be placed under the approach slab and three feet out of the approach slab. So, to cover this area, I think we need more flex base than what it was estimated please advise. The material which the contractor using has a max dry density of 143.4 pcf. > Miftah Semane > Engineering Assistant > TXDOT, NTAO. >2501 Vest Euless Blv. > Euless, TX 76040 > miftah.semane@txdot.gov<maiIto:miftah.semane@ txdot.gov> > (214) 718-3610 Cell > Talk. Text.Crash. > [Talk. Text. >Crash.]<Iitip://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/sliar >e-road/distracted.html> >This electronic mail message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message, together with any attachment, may contain the sender's organization's confidential and privileged information.The recipient is hereby notified to treat the information as confidential and privileged and to not disclose or use the information except as authorized by sender's organization. Any unauthorized review, printing, retention,copying, disclosure,distribution, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of the material from any computer. Thank you for your cooperation. > Talk.Text. Crash. 9 > > [Talk. Text. >Crasli.]<http://%%,Nv%v.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/spar > e-road/distracted.litml> > Talk.Text. Crash. > [Talk. Text. > Crash.]<hup:Hwww.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/spar > e-road/distracted.litml> > <1Flexbase under bridge approach slab Calculation.pd t> Talk.Text. Crash. [Talk.Text. Crash.]<Ilttp://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/share-road/distracted.iltlnl> Talk. Text. Crash. [Talk. Text. Crash.]<Iitip:Hww%v.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/sliare-road/distracted.litml> Talk. Text. Crash. [Talk.Text. Crash.]<Itttp://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/share-road/distracted.htm1> Talk.Text. Crash. [Talk.Text.Crash.]<http://%Y%vw.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/trafftc/safety/share-road/distracted.litml> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the Messagel-abs Email Security System. Talk. Text. Crash. [Talk.Text. Crash.]<http://%k,%k,%v.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffiiclsafety/share-road/distracted.htm1> Talk.Text.Crash. (Talk.Text. Crash.)<http:flwww."dot.gov/inside-txdot/divisionitraffic/safety/share-road/distracted.html> Talk. Text.Crash. [Talk. Text.Crash.]<htip://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/share-road/distracted.html> 10 This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. Miftah Semane From: Hector Canales Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 6:27 PM To: Alex Garcia Cc: Norman Robertson; Michael; Miftah Semane;Chuck Putnam Subject: RE: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI #67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Thank you Alex. -----Original Message----- From:Alex Garcia [mailto:aig@freese.com] Sent:Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:38 AM To: Hector Canales Cc: Norman Robertson; Michael; Miftah Semane; Chuck Putnam Subject: RE:0902-48-539-Tarrant- RFI#67-36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress No,the City does not want to keep per plan, but they do not like the alternative suggested.i understand the urgency and am working through this to have an answer next week. Alex Garcia 817-735-7321 -----Original Message----- From: Hector Canales[mailto:Hector.Canales@txdot.gov] Sent:Wednesday, May 06, 2015 4:27 PM To:Alex Garcia Cc: Norman Robertson; Michael; Miftah Semane;Chuck Putnam Subject: RE:0902-48-539-Tarrant- RFI#67-36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Alex, Is the City of Fort Worth wanting to staying as per the plans? Is this correct, if this is the case, let's get concurrence from the City and send us the RFI response so we can send it to the contractor. The answer to this RFI is delaying the continuation for the work at the bridge. Thank you -----Original Message----- From: Alex Garcia [mailto:aig@freese.com] Sent:Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:04 PM To: Miftah Semane Cc: Norman Robertson; Hector Canales; Hector Canales; Michael Subject: RE:0902-48-539-Tarrant-RFI#67-36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Sorry, I'm trying to sort through all the traffic on this one. The City does not want riprap in the bottom of the channel though. Alex Garcia 817-735-7321 1 -----Original Message----- From: Miftah Semane [mailto:Miftah.Semane@txdot.gov] Sent:Wednesday, May 06, 2015 9:24 AM To:Alex Garcia Cc: Norman Robertson; Hector Canales; Hector Canales; Michael Subject: Re:0902-48-539-Tarrant- RFI#67-36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Alex, where are we on this RFI ?We haven't got any official response on the RFI so we can close the RF1. Miftah Semane Engineering Assistant TXDOT, NTAO. 2501 West Euless Blv. Euless,TX 76040 miftah.semane@txdot.gov (214)718-3610 Cell From: Chuck Putnam Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 6:54 AM To: Miftah Semane Cc: Norman Robertson; Hector Canales Subject: FW:0902-48-539-Tarrant-RFI#67-36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Mifta, Please respond to this RFI, last I heard the consultant said no. -----Original Message----- From: Minh Tran Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 6:57 PM To: Norman Robertson; Chuck Putnam Cc:Aureliano Flores; Miftah Semane; Hector Canales Subject: RE:0902-48-539-Tarrant- RFI#67-36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Please provide written response.When can we complete that?Thanks, Minh., -----Original Message----- From: Norman Robertson Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 8:37 AM To: Chuck Putnam Cc:Aureliano Flores; Miftah Semane; Minh Tran; Hector Canales Subject: RE:0902-48-539-Tarrant- RFI#67-36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Chuck, I emailed Alex yesterday morning reguarding this RFI so we can send a written response from the engineer of record(he had stated at our meeting on Friday that we are NOT going with 36" rip-rap and will stay with the gabion mattress.) 2 5►2BI2015 Miftah Semane-Outlook 0902-48-S39 - Tarrant - RFI67 - 36" Ri ra vs Gabion Mattress Riprap Reply Reply all Forward Miftah Semane Mark as unread Tue 5/26/2015 12:43 PM To: Mitchell Robinson <mrobinson@haydonbc.com>; Cc: Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Norman Robertson; Josh Courcy Ocourcy@haydonbc.com); Mitchell, Based upon the revised response to RFI 67. Please submit a proposal for replacing the 36" stone riprap and gabion mattress with articulating concrete block. All the necessary details are attached from the Houston District, but Haydon shall submit detailed manufacturer info for approval prior to installation, including details regarding anchoring. Miftah Semane Engineering Assistant TXDOT„ NTAO. 2501 West Euless Blv. Euless, TX 76040 miftah.semane@txdot.gov (214) 718-3610 cell data.lwd Oml:cherset=Uf•8.963Cdv%2Wass%3D%22 rp %22%20tab ndex%3D%22-1%22% sMe%3D%22pwigon%349620reladve%3B%20cdor%3A%... 111 ' 5126/2015 MlftahSwnane-Outlook 0902-48-539 - Tarrant - RFI##67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Reply Reply all Forward Miftah Semane Mark as unread Tue 5/26/2015 12:35 PM To: Mitchell Robinson <mrobinson@haydonbc.com>; Cc: Chuck Putnam; Hector Canales; Norman Robertson; Josh Courcy ocourcy@haydonbc.com); RFI #67 - 36 inch Stone ... Hol 276 KB 511 4 attachments (1 MB) Download all Mitchell, Please find the attached response for RFI# 67 Miftah Semane Engineering Assistant TXDOT, NTAO. 2501 West Euless Blv. Euless,TX 76040 miftah.semane@txdot.gov (214) 718-3610 Cell ilalalarflHmlrlwraof_iN_A9L�(`riu9f.7nrizca9L.�I1967J rn 19L.72%XVaHMaY9631]9622.19622%2[khda%3D9622Dosibm%3A%20relallve°l 38%2Dcdor%3A%.._ 111 51ti►2015 Miftah Semane-Oullook 0902-48-539 - Tarrant - RFI #67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Alex Garcia <aig@freesE Mark as unread Wed 5/6/2015 12.04 PM Sorry, I'm trying to sort through all the traffic on this one.The City does not want riprap in the bottom of the channel though. Alex Garcia 817-735-7321 REPLY REPLY ALL FORWARD Miftah Semane Mark as unread Wed 5/6/2015 9:23 AM Sent Items To: Alex Garcia <aig@freese.com>; Cc: Norman Robertson; Hector Canales; Michael <Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov>; Alex, where are we on this RFI ? We haven't got any official response on the RFI so we can close the RFI. Miftah Semane Engineering Assistant TXDOT, NTAO. 2501 West Euless Blv. Euless, TX 76040 miftah.semane@txdot.gov (214) 718-3610 Cell data:texMftl:cherset-uLd-8.%Xciv%2Wa4s%MOA" rn 19L72%XjaNrr4,rk'an917�_�gC�aC7f�wiaator+acr�....su�,,..oc�eacn.� 12n ,1..ar-2Aer u. 51U2015 Mitlah Samna-Outlook 0902-48-539 - Tarrant - RFI67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Chuck Putnam Mark as unread Mon 5/4/2015 6.54 AM Inbox Mifta, Please respond to this RFI, last I heard the consultant said no. Minh Tran Mark as unread Fn 5/1/2015 6:56 PM Inbox Please provide written response. When can we complete that?Thanks, Minh. Chuck Putnam Mark as unread Fri 5/1/2015 12:59 PM Inbox FYI, last written correspondence. Norman Robertson Mark as unread Fri 5/1/20151254 PM Inbox We had disscussed this issue for quite some time before the RFI was submitted. According to the meeting minutes: 1/29/15: Haydon needs clarification on the gradation of rip-rap (the plans call for 36").They want to know if 36" is the gradation or the thikness. 2/4/15: Haydon needs clarification on the gradation of rip-rap( the plans call for 36").They want to know if 36" is the gradation or the thikness. TxDOT wants the contractor to submit a proposal on the issue. 2/11/15: Haydon needs clarification on the gradation of rip-rap(the plans call for 36").They want to know if 36" is the gradation or the thickness. TxDOT wants the contractor to submit a proposal on the issue. Mitchell is working on the proposal. 3/30/15: Proposal submitted to TxDOT. datatexUhtml:charset--uff-B_%3Cdiv%2(YJass%3D%22 ro 1%22%20t %3n%"-1%22%2(Rmp%3n%2Annitlm%3A%2trelanve%3B%Mcd %3A%_.. 113 5142015 M1 Semens-OWook 4/13/15: Revised proposal sent in. 4/14/15:RF1 # 67 was submitted. After that, there has been no official response to the RFI from Freese and Nichols. ( see the emails below) So, no official response has been forwarded to Haydon. As for what has Haydon said about staying with the gabions, once it gets bumped up, I don't have anything to tell them until we get a response from the engineer of record. Blake Hector Canales Mark as unread Fri 5/1/2015 10:05 AM Inbox Blake, What did the contractor say about staying with the gabion mattress? Miftah, You probably already have all the correspondence about this RFI compiled in the file. Can you please make everything is in there. Make a timeline. For example, when was the RFI first brought up by Haydon. Then when did the consultant provided response. When did we provide response to Haydon, etc......... Get with Blake on this so that both of you are on the same page. tet me know when you have it so that we can write a response letter. Thank you Norman Robertson Mark as unread Fri 5/1/2015 8:36 AM Inbox Chuck, I emailed Alex yesterday morning reguarding this RFI so we can send a written response from the engineer of record(he had stated at our meeting on Friday that we are NOT going with 36" rip-rap and will stay with the gabion mattress.) I have not:heard back from him, yet. Blake From: Minh Tran Sent:Thursday, April 30, 2015 7:40 PM To: Hector Canales; Chuck Putnam; Alem Teketele; Norman Robertson deta:tOfMml:Chwsetzud-a_°J mriv96xHanft96_' i4L9) rn i9L7)9L�rY�FJrvbv4LUlAL77_19L��4L�flch.leoc�rfoc��....stx...at�nat�x+.. «....ateeot�n .�..oc�wo� nn '514/2015 Mlflah Semens-OLOwk Cc:Aurellano Flores Subject: FW: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI#67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Can y'all provided me with a response, please.Thanks, Minh. Norman Robertson Mark as unread Thu 4/301201510:15 AM Inbox Alex, Where are we at with this RFI? Blake Mitchell Robinson <mro Mark as unread Thu 4/23/2015 12.21 PM Inbox Aureliano, This RFI has been outstanding for some time and is delaying completion of the bridge.We have received periodic updates, but have not seen any progress towards resolution. Haydon is now escalating this issue to the next step in the escalation ladder. Per our discussion in the partnering meeting, please ensure this issue is escalated to Minh Tran. I will make sure Haydon personnel understands this issue is now on Brad Caldwell's level. Thanks, Mitchell Robinson Project Manager HAYDON BUILDING CORP 8200 Springwood Dr. Ste 230 ------ -- ----------------- Irvina TX 75063 972-739-6405 main 214-952-8339 cell www.haydonbc.com facebook I twitter I linkedin data:texMml:ctwsetzud-8.%3Cdv%20clase%3D%22 rn i%22%2dadMw%3D%22-1%M2f tWe%3D%22oaa1ffan%3A%20re1aUve%36%20cdar%3A%— 313 40015 M Iftah Semens-Outlook 0902-48-539 - Tarrant - RFI #67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress REPLY REPLY ALL FORWARD Mitchell Robinson <mro Mark as unread Thu 4/23/2015 9:34 AM Inbox To: 'Alex Garcia' <aig@freese.com>; Josh Courcy <jcourcy@haydonbc.com>; Jon Harshbarger <jharshbarger@haydonbc.com>; Cc: Miftah Semane; Chuck Putnam; Norman Robertson; michael.weirs@fortworthtexas.gov; Alex, RFI 67 is not addressing whether or not the installation itself will be easier. It is pointing out that, due to the excessive amount of ground water, the finished product will be a quality product only if the rip rap is installed. It is not possible to install the gabion mattress in a way that will insure the finish product will be a quality product.This is mainly attributed to the type of material that will be under the rip rap or gabion mattress. Because of the ground water, this material is essentially soup.There is not way to properly grade this material for a flat basket. Furthermore, this material is not suitable to support a basket. On the other hand, excavation can be performed for rip rap stone then filter fabric spread out.The fabric will help stabilize the rip rap stone, which do not require a perfectly flat foundation.The rip rap installation will ensure an acceptable finished product that achieves the intended purpose. Thanks, Mitchell Robinson Project Manager HAYDON BUILDING CORP 8200 Springwood Dr. Ste 230 Irving,TX 75063 972-739-6405 main 214-952-8339 cell www.hay_donbc.com facebook I twitter I linkedin Alex Garcia <aig@freesE Mark as unread Thu 4/23/2015 9:21 AM inbox Can one of you please elaborate regarding RFI 67 as to how the 36" riprap instead of the gabion mattress makes the installation easier? Although the engineer is not opposed to it, It is unclear to him how the change of material will be any different as you will still have to deal with groundwater regardless of the material selected. Alex Garcia 817-735-7321 daWtexNlml:cherset=utf-8.%3Cdv%2WasiL%30%22 re i9G719Lx11whlr�rfs+Y9c.'an9G�.1�tr�t *,i�c�na���.,.,.�x.r.ac�na��n.da+,.aoc �r,..a..o���o� „� 4/2312015 M Iftah Semam-Outlook -----Original Message----- From: Hanna, Mary imailto:Marr LHannagbfortworthtexas.-gQv1 Sent:Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:56 AM To:Weiss, Michael Cc:Alex Garcia; Eubanks, Steven E. Subject: RE: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI#67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Mike, From the e-mails below, the channel designer doesn't say that the Rock Rip Rap is going to be any different in installing than the gabion mattress and the Contractor will still need to deal with the groundwater. Stormwater Division don't recommend the use of the Rock Rip due to the maintenance issue, we usually recommend the use of TRM. But I wasn't involved in this project during design so I don't know the reasons behind using gabions or Rip Rap and I didn't see on the plans you send any data to help in deciding what type of channel erosion protection to use. Thanks, Mary Hanna, P.E., CFM Professional Engineer TPW, Stormwater Management Division Tel: 817 392-5565 Fax: 817 392-2433 e-mail: Mary.Hanna@fortworthtexas.gov City of Fort Worth - Working together to build a strong community. How am I doing? Please feel free to contact my supervisor: Steven.Eubanks@fortworthtexas.gov This email message and emails sent to this account are subject to disclosure under the Open Records Act, and may become public information. -----Original Message----- From:Weiss, Michael Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 3:15 PM To: Eubanks, Steven E.; Hanna, Mary Cc:Alex Garcia Subject: RE: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI#67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Steve and Mary, Can I get you to review this quickly? The contractor is needing a response to be able to continue the bridge work. Thanks, Mike Weiss, P.E. Senior Professional Engineer datat®AAtml:ctrerscutf.8.9L3Cdv962or�ss■9t,an�n rn -JAM 4/Z312015 Mlftah Semane-Ou cx* Cityot Fort Worth Transportatior,._,d Public Works Department Intrastrucb Design and Construction 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 (817) 392-8485 Office phone (817) 584-6441 Cell phone Michael.Weiss@fortworthtexas.gov How am I doing? Please feel free to contact my supervisor: Martin.Phillips@fortworthtexas.gov City of Fort Worth - Working together to build a strong community. -----Original Message----- From: Alex Garcia (mailto:aia ftegscoml Sent:Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12A1 PM To:Weiss, Michael; Eubanks, Steven E.; Hanna, Mary Subject: FW: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI#67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Michael, Attached is the RFI regarding the channel protection on Precinct Line Road.This is where the contractor is proposing to change from gabion mattress per plan to 36" riprap due to groundwater concerns.The channel designer agrees with the proposal but we would like the City Stormwater staff to also review and approve the change of channel protection material, I have attached the channel sheets for quick reference. Alex Garcia 817-735-7321 -----Original Message----- From: Eric Friedrich [Mai lto:friedrigbg@hhresaurces.coml Sent:Wednesday, April 15, 2015 4:50 PM To: Alex Garcia Subject: RE: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI#67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Alex, We agree that the 36" stone protection can be used in place of the 18" gabion mattresses. From a riprap design perspective, it should workjust as well. However, we recommend that the City of Fort Worth, in particular their stormwater folks, review this recornmendation and concur, before moving ahead w/the change order. Still would like to hear what you find out from the geotech report, and as mentioned before, it seems to us the contractor may still have the same dewatering issues with putting the filter fabric and stone protection in as he would with the gabions. But, of course that is his situation to deal with. Design wise, either lining looks OK. Thanks, Eric -----Original Message----- From:Alex Garcia fmailto:aig60fMese.comi Sent:Wednesday, April 15, 201512:56 PM To: Eric Friedrich Subject: RE: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI#67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress MalexVttml:dwset=lN-8.%3Cdv%2Wass%M%" rn o,n 41232015 Miflah Semane-Outlook I think another part of the concern with the mattress was the bedding. Since that is a lot finer, they are concerned that all that will wash out whereas with the rock riprap it won't have the same issue. Regarding the groundwater, I can check our geotech report when I'm back to the office tomorrow to see if it had any sort of specific requirements. Alex I.Garcia, P.E. Freese and Nichols, Inc. 4055 International Plaza, Suite 200 Fort Worth, TX 76109-4895 p (817) 735-7321 f(817)735-7491 From: Eric Friedrich [friedricher@hhresources.com] Sent:Wednesday, April 15, 2015 10:44 AM To: Alex Garcia Subject: RE: 0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI#67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Alex, The question in the RFI is 'would it be acceptable to replace ..gabion mattresses... with 36" stone protection'?We are looking into that and will give you a response shortly. The comment on groundwater seems to be an incidental issue. They will have to address/control groundwater regardless of the channel lining technique, to provide a stable subgrade for construction of either Stone Protection or Gabion Mattresses. The stone protection is twice as deep as the mattress, it still requires a filter fabric, so they would have a deeper channel excavation and even more of a groundwater situation to deal with if they pursue that option. Do you agree? Is there something else we are missing here? Thanks, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Alex Garcia fmailto:aig@freese.coml Sent:Tuesday,April 14, 2015 10:38 AM To: Eric Friedrich Subject: FW:0902-48-539 -Tarrant - RFI #67 - 36" Riprap vs Gabion Mattress Eric, I thought this one had already been submitted. Can you review this one as well?The contractor is pointing out groundwater concerns here. Alex Garcia 817-735-7321 Norman Robertson Mark as unread Tue 4/14/2015 10:44 AM Inbox daULleXbWml'ehersd-1lf•B.OA3CdvQA2(1dsmc%.gnOA" rn ,c 4rMW15 MIRahSemans-Outlook . image001jpg 16 KB 1 attachment(16 KB) Josh, TOOT is in reciept of RFI #67. Thank you, Blake Norman Robertson Mark as unread Tue 4/14/2015 10:34 AM Inbox image001 jpg RFI 16 KB 16 k 2 attachments (32 KB) Download all Mike/Alex, Please find RFI #67 for 36" riprap vs Gabion Mattress Thank you, Blake Josh Courcy <jcourcy@r Mark as unread Tue 4/14/2015 1014 AM Inbox RFI#67 - 36 inch Stone ... 16 KB 1 attachment(16 KB) Download all All, In addition to the revised proposal sent on 4/13/15, please see attached RFI #67. Thanks, Josh Courcy Project Engineer „cid:image00 HAYDON BUILDING CORP dale:tmd4*nl:dwsg--td-R-%3Cdv%2ndase%3n%77 re AA 1or,4`:v_ *'�'rM'j�'—'"" CONTRACT TIME STATEMENT REPORT DATE 12/06116 -Sit CONTRACT ID: 090248539 HIGHWAY: CS PROJECT: BR 2006(132) DISTRICT: 02 CONTRACT: 08133013 COUNTY: TARRANT AWARD AMOUNT: $10,487,665.24 AREA ENGINEER: Minh Tran,P.E. PROJECTED AMOUNT: $10,498,196.74 AREA NUMBER: 052 CONTRACTOR: HAYDON BUILDING CORP. PERIOD7 06/2512015 to 09/0112015 WORK BEGIN DATE: 08/11/2014 ASSE5Sr=Q LIQ DAMAGES: 0 TIME CHARGES BEGIN: 05112/2014 LIO DAMAGE RATE: $1,285.00 BID DAYS: 315 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: 0 C.O.ADJUSTED DAYS: 0 DAYS AT $1,285.00 CURRENT DAYS: 315 PER DAY DAYS CHARGED TO DATE: 261 TOTAL: $0.00 PHYSICAL WORK COMPLETE: 00/00/0000 DAILY BREAKDOWN PERIOD SUMMARY Date or Days Days Diary Date or Days Days Days Charged Credited Adjustment Days Charged Credited 06/25/2015 1 69 48 21 06/2612015 1 06/27/2015 1 SATURDAY 06/28/2015 1 SUNDAY 06/29/2015 1 SATURDAY 10 06/30/2015 1 SUNDAY 10 07/01/2015 1 TIME SUSPENDED 1 07/0212015 1 07/0312015 1 TIME SUSPENDED 07/04/2015 1 SATURDAY 07/05/2015 1 SUNDAY 07/0612015 1 07/07/2015 1 07/0812015 1 07/09/2015 1 07/10/2015 1 07/11/2015 1 SATURDAY 07/12/2015 1 SUNDAY 07/13/2015 1 07/14/2015 1 07/15/2015 1 07/1612015 1 07/17/2015 1 07/18/2015 1 SATURDAY CERTIFIED AS CORRECT AND ONE 07/19/2015 1 SUNDAY COPY HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE 07/20/2015 1 CONTRACTOR 07/21/2015 1 07/222015 1 07/23/2015 1 AREA/PROJECT ENGINEER 07/242015 1 0725/2015 1 SATURDAY 0726/2015 1 SUNDAY 0727/2015 1 07/28/2015 1 CONTRACT ID 090248539 CONTRACT TIME STATEMENT `` Page 2 of 2 DAILY BREAKDOWN Dale or Days Days Diary Days Charged Credited Adjustment 07/29/2015 1 07/30/2015 1 07/31/2015 1 08/01/2015 1 SATURDAY 08/02/2015 1 SUNDAY 08/03/2015 1 08/04/2015 1 08/05/2015 1 08/08/2015 1 08/07/2015 1 08108/2015 1 SATURDAY 08/09/2015 1 SUNDAY 08/10/2015 1 08/11/2015 1 08/12/2015 1 08/13/2015 1 08/1412015 1 08/15/2015 1 SATURDAY 08/16/2015 1 SUNDAY 08/17/2015 1 08/18/2015 1 08/19/2015 1 08/2012015 1 08/21/2015 1 08/22/2015 1 SATURDAY 08/23/2015 1 SUNDAY 08/24/2015 1 08/2512015 1 08/26/2015 1 08/2712015 1 08128/2015 1 08/29/2015 1 SATURDAY 08/30/2015 1 SUNDAY 08/31/2015 1 09/01/2015 1 Estimate Number. 0018 1~ &NPWI r CONTRACT TIME STATEMENT REPORT DATE: 12106116 ;5itel!llgnpge CONTRACT ID: 090248539 HIGHWAY: CS PROJECT: BR 200 4132) DISTRICT: 02 CONTRACT: 08133013 COUNTY_ TARRANT AWARD AMOUNT: $10,487,665.24 AREA ENGINEER: Minh Tran,P.E. PROJECTED AMOUNT. $10,498,196.74 AREA NUMBER 052 CONTRACTOR: HAYDON BUILDING CORP. PERIOD: 05/26/2015 to 09101/2015 WORK BEGIN DATE: 08/11/2014 ASSESSED LIG DAMAGES: 0 TIME CHARGES BEGIN: 05/12/2014 LIQ DAMAGE RATE: $1,285,00 BID DAYS: 315 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: 0 C.O.ADJUSTED DAYS: p DAYS AT 61,285.00 CURRENT DAYS: 315 PER DAY DAYS CHARGED TO DATE: 261 TOTAL: $0.00 PHYSICAL WORK COMPLETE: 00/00/0000 DAILY BREAKDOWN PERIOD SUMMARY Date or Days Days Diary Date or Days Days Days Charged Credited Adjustment Days Charged Creditacl 05/26/2015 1 99 70 29 05127/2015 1 05/28/2015 1 05/29/2015 1 05/30/2015 1 SATURDAY SATURDAY 14 05/3112015 1 SUNDAY SUNDAY 14 06/01/2015 1 TIME SUSPENDED 1 06/02/2015 1 06103/2015 1 060/12015 1 0BAM015 1 06/06/2015 1 SATURDAY 06/07/2015 1 SUNDAY 06/0812015 1 06109/2015 1 08/1012015 1 06/11/2015 1 06/12/2015 1 06/13/2015 1 SATURDAY 06/1412015 1 SUNDAY 06115/2015 1 06/16/2015 1 06/1712015 1 06/18/2015 1 CERTIFIED AS CORRECT AND ONE 06119/2015 1 COPY HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE 061=015 1 SATURDAY CONTRACTOR 06/2112015 1 SUNDAY 06/22/2015 1 06123/2015 1 AREAIPROJECT ENGINEER 06/2412015 1 0612512015 1 06126!2015 1 06/2712015 1 SATURDAY 06128/2015 1 SUNDAY CONTRACT ID 090248539 CONTRACT TIME STATEMENT `® Page 2 of 3 DAILY BREAKDOWN Data or Days Days Diary Days Charged Credited Adjustment 06/29/2015 1 06/30/2015 1 07/01/2015 1 07/02/2015 1 07/03/2015 1 TIME SUSPENDED 07/04/2015 1 SATURDAY 07/05/2015 1 SUNDAY 07/06/2015 1 07/07/2015 1 07/D8/2015 1 07/09/2015 1 07/10/2015 1 07/11/2015 1 SATURDAY 07/12/2015 1 SUNDAY 07/13/2015 1 07/14/2015 1 07/1512015 1 0711612015 1 07/17/2015 1 07/1812015 1 SATURDAY 07/19/2015 1 SUNDAY 07/20/2015 1 07/21/2015 1 07/22/2015 1 07/23/2015 1 07/24/2015 1 07/25/2015 1 SATURDAY 07126/2015 1 SUNDAY 07/27/2015 1 07/2812015 1 07/2912015 1 07/30/2015 1 07/31/2015 1 08/0112015 1 SATURDAY 08/02/2015 1 SUNDAY 08/03/2015 1 08/04/2015 1 08/0512015 1 08/06/2015 1 08/07/2015 1 08/0812015 1 SATURDAY 08/09/2015 1 SUNDAY 08110/2015 1 08/11/2015 1 08112/2015 1 08113/2015 1 08/14/2015 1 08/15/2015 1 SATURDAY 08116/2015 1 SUNDAY 08117/2015 1 08/18/2015 1 08/19/2015 1 08/20/2015 1 08/21/2015 1 08/22/2015 1 SATURDAY e CONTRACT ID 090248539 CONTRACT TIME STATEMENT ``' Page 3 of 3 DAILY BREAKDOWN Date or Days Days Diary Days Charged Credited Adjustment 08123/2015 1 SUNDAY 08/24/2015 1 08/2512015 1 09/26!2015 1 08/2712015 1 09/28/2015 1 08/29/2015 1 SATURDAY 08!30/2015 1 SUNDAY 0813112015 1 0910112015 1 Estimate Number. 0018 Bridge delay time frame (36' rip rap RFI 67) 1. 1/29/15: Haydon needs clarification on the gradation of rip-rap (the plans call for 36").They want to know if 36" is the gradation or the thickness. 2. 2/4/15: Haydon needs clarification on the gradation of rip-rap (the plans call for 36"). They want to know if 36"is the gradation or the thickness. 3. TxDOT wants the contractor to submit a proposal on the issue. 4. 2/11/15: Haydon needs clarification on the gradation of rip-rap ( the plans call for 36"). They want to know if 36" is the gradation or the thickness. 5. TxDOT wants the contractor to submit a proposal on the issue. Mitchell is working on the proposal. 6. 3/30/15: Proposal submitted to TxDOT. 7. 4/13/15: Revised proposal sent in. 8. 4/14/15: RFI #67 was submitted. 9. On 4/23/15 Alex requested more info on the RFI, and the same date Haydon Explained the issued through email. 3. Haydon escalated the issued on 4/23/15 4. TxDOT asked Freese and Nichols about the statues of the RFI 4/30/15 5. TxDOT again asked FN about the status of the RFI on 5/6/15 7. TxDOT sent the response to the contractor on 5/26/15 8. Aguirre and fields gave two different options to precede the bridge work without installing the gabion matters on Aug 3, 2015. Offidal site of the City of Fort Worth,Texas CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FdRTI OR` 11 COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 12/4/2018 REFERENCE ** 20PRECINCT LINE ROAD DATE: 12/4/2018 NO.: C-28940 LOG NAME: CHANGE ORDERS CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC NO HEARING: SUBJECT: Approve and Authorize Execution of Change Order Nos. 38, 43, and 45-51 for the Construction of Precinct Line Road from State Highway 10 to Concho Trail and Walker Branch Bridge with the Texas Department of Transportation and Authorize Payment in the Amount of$476,647.08 for the Funding of these Change Orders (COUNCIL DISTRICT 5) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Authorize the approval and execution of Change Order Nos. 38, 43, and 45-51 for the construction of Precinct Line Road from State Highway 10 to Concho Trail and Walker Branch Bridge; and 2. Authorize payment of these change orders to Texas Department of Transportation in the amount of$476,647.08 under Local Transportation Project Advance Funding Agreements for the projects (City Secretary Contract No. 44743), and revising the total City contribution to $4,071,258.21 (City Project Nos. 00105 and 00147). ' DISCUSSION: The 2004 Bond Program provided funding for improvements to widen Precinct Line Road from two- lanes to four-lanes from State Highway 10 to Concho Trail including a new four lane bridge over Walker Branch and intersection improvements at Trinity Boulevard. This project includes reconstructed travel lanes, left and right turn lanes, storm drain improvements, sidewalks, railroad crossing, bridge and traffic signal improvements. Under these change orders, TxDOT's contractor, Haydon Building Corp, will be compensated for temporary pavement quantity overruns, and delay claims resulting from franchise utility conflicts and constructability issues with the design plans. These claims consist of 3 months of additional barricades, signs, and traffic handling, water service, material price escalations, and standby equipment costs. These items affected the critical construction path and prevented the contractor from continuing construction in an efficient manner. TxDOT and the contractor engaged in a mediation process to arrive at a settlement for the expenses associated with these unanticipated delays. An additional 90 working days will be added to the contract. Staff considers the cost for this change order to be fair and reasonable for the proposed roadway construction. Previous M&Cs approved by City Council for the Walker Branch Bridge Project (City Project No. 00105): C-20868, 7/26/05; C-26154, 3/19/13; and C-27891, 8/30/16, and administratively approved change orders for this project authorized total payments to TxDOT in the amount of $626,403.47. This change order will authorize payment to TxDOT in the amount of$424,578.94 for Change Order Nos. 38, and 47 - 51. Previous M&Cs approved by City Council for the Precinct Line Road Project (City Project No. 00147): C-26154, 3/19/13; and C-27830, 8/2/16, and administratively approved change orders for this project authorized total payments to TxDOT in the amount of$2,898,207.66. The Water Department also paid TxDOT the amount $70,000.00 for Change Order No. 12 (M&C C-28093, 1/31/17). This change order will authorize payment to TxDOT in the amount of$52,068.14 for Change Order Nos. 43, 45, and 46. The total payment to TxDOT for both projects is $476,647.08 and increases the City contribution to $4,071,258.21. The overall City project budget is $4,296,974.05 for Precinct Line Road (City Project No. 00147) and $1,292,000.45 for the Walker Branch Bridge (City Project No. 00105). The total project budget is $17,357,207.50 and includes federal participation of$7,249,075.00, state participation of $1,790,158.00, and Tarrant County participation of$2,729,000.00. The completion of this project will have no significant impact on the general fund operating budget. Construction was substantially complete in July 2017. Funding for these change orders is being provided from the 2004 Capital Improvement Program. The project is in COUNCIL DISTRICT 5. This contract will be with a governmental entity, state agency or public institution of higher education: (Texas Department of Transportation TxDOT). FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Director of Finance certifies that upon approval of the above recommendations, funds are available, as appropriated in the current capital budget of the Street Improvements Fund and the Street Improvements Supplemental Fund. TO Fund Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount ID I ID Year (Chartfield 2) FROM Fund Department Account Project Program Activity Budget Reference# Amount ID I ID Year (Chartfield 2) Submitted for City Manager's Office by Susan Alanis (8180) Originating Department Head: Steve Cooke (5134) Additional Information Contact: Steve Cooke (5134) ATTACHMENTS