Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 11174 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CLOSING BENEFIT HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND FROM RUFUS STREET TO MILLER AVENUE, AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; FIXING CHARGES AND LIENS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTY THEREON, AND AGAINST THE OWNERS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES, RESERVING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE RIGHT TO ALLOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNTS OF THE ASSESSMENT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY CREDIT GRANTED; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE THIS ORDINANCE IN THE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has declared the necessity for and ordered that each of the following portions of streets, avenues and public places be improved by raising, grading, filling and constructing thereon: FORBES STREET from Campbell Avenue to Sydney Street and from Rufus Street to Miller Avenue, known and designated as Project No. 67-040273 and 11-040273, to be improved by constructing a six-inch thick reinforced concrete pavement with a seven-inch high attached concrete curb over a six-inch thick lime stabilized subgrade so that the finished roadway will be thirty feet wide on a fifty foot width Right-of-Way. Six-inch thick reinforced concrete driveway approaches and four-inch thick concrete sidewalks will be constructed where shown on the plans. WHEREAS, concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line, storm drains, and other appurtenances shall be constructed. WHEREAS, all improvements will be constructed strictly according to approved Plans and Specifications. WHEREAS, estimates of the cost of the improvements to the streets, avenues, and public places were prepared, filed, approved, and adopted by the City Council . WHEREAS, the proper notice of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing was given. WHEREAS, the hearing was held on the 15th day of September, 1992 at 10:00 o'clock A.M. in the Council Chamber of the City of Fort Worth; and at the hearing the Council permitted all interested parties a full and fair opportunity to be heard. WHEREAS, the City Council , having fully considered all the matters presented during the hearing, is of the opinion that the hearing should be closed and the assessments should be made and levied as herein ordered. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I . The benefit hearing is hereby closed. 11 . The City Council finds from the evidence (i) that the assessments should be made and levied against the respective parcels of property abutting the streets, avenues, and public places and against the owners of such property; (ii) that the assessments and charges are correct; (iii) that the assessment and charges are substantially in proportion to the benefits conferred to the respective parcels of abutting property by the improvements in the unit in which the assessments are levied; (iv) that considering the benefits received and the burdens imposed, the assessments establish substantial justice, equality, and uniformity between the owners of the respective parcels of abutting property; (v) that each parcel of abutting property assessed is specially benefitted in the enhanced value of the improvements in a sum of money in excess of the sum for which the assessment is levied and the charge made; (vi) that the apportionment of the cost of the improvements is in accord with city ordinances; and (vii) that the proceedings of the city for the improvements are valid. III . There shall be, and is hereby, levied and assessed against the parcels of abutting property described in Exhibit "A" attached and dated June, 1992, and against the owners thereof, whether named or incorrectly named, the sums of money itemized opposite the description of the respective parcels of abutting property. -2- IV. Where more than one person, firm or corporation owns an interest in any property described in Exhibit "A", each person, firm, or corporation shall be personally liable only for his or its assessment in the proportion that his or its interest bears to the total ownership interest of the property. An interest in jointly owned property may be released from the assessment lien upon payment of the proportionate amount owed. V. The amounts described in Exhibit "A" and assessed against the parcels of abutting property and the owners thereof , together with interest at eight percent a year, reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, are hereby declared (i) to be and are made a lien upon the parcels of abutting property against which they are assessed; (ii) to be and are made a personal liability and charge against the owners of the parcels of abutting property, whether such owners are correctly named; (iii) to be and constitute the first enforceable lien against the parcel of abutting property on which the assessments are levied, superior to all other liens and claims, except state, county, and school district taxes and city ad valorem taxes. The assessments shall be payable on or before 30 days after the acceptance by the City of Fort Worth of the project; provided, however, an abutting property owner may elect to pay the assessment in five equal , consecutive annual installments. The first installment shall be paid no later than thirty days after the acceptance by the City of Fort Worth of the project. Each subsequent installment shall be paid annually on each annivesary date of the acceptance of the project . In the alternative, an abutting property owner may elect to pay the assessment in 49 equal , consecutive monthly installments, the first installment to be paid no later than thirty days after the acceptance by the City of Fort Worth of the project . Any owner electing to pay the assessment in installments, must execute a promissory note and mechanic's and materialman's lien contract evidencing the owner's intent to pay the assessment in accord with the terms of one of the installment alternatives. If the owner elects to pay the assessment in installments under either alternative, the assessment shall bear interest from the date of acceptance of the project at the rate of eight percent per year. Should any installment not be paid on its due date, the City of Fort Worth shall have the option to accelerate the entire unpaid balance of the assessment and declare it immediately payable. Any terms governing any default in the payment of any installment shall be set forth in the mechanic's and materialmen's lien contract and shall be uniform among all abutting property owners executing an installment contract. In addition, the City Attorney shall have the authority to authorize terms of payment different than those specified herein when the Director of Transportation and Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship exists. VI . Any default in the payment of any assessment shall be enforced either (i) by the sale of the parcel of abutting property by the Assessor and Collector of Taxes of the city in the same manner provided for the sale of property for the nonpayment of ad valorem taxes, (ii) at the option of the city or its assigns by suit in any court , or (iii) as provided in the mechanic's and materialman's contract created by this ordinance. The city shall exercise all powers to aid in the enforcement and collection of the assessments. -3- VII . The total amount assessed against the respective parcels of abutting property and the owners thereof is in accord with the proceeding of the city relating to the improvements and assessments thereof and is less than the proportion of the cost allowed and permitted by the law. VIII . Although charges have been fixed, levied, and assessed as stated, the City Council hereby reserves the right to reduce the assessments by allowing appropriate credits to certain property owners. Even though the City Council reserves the right to issue credits, it .shall not be required to issue credits, and will not do so if the credits are inequitable or discriminatory. The principal amount of each assessment certificate issued by the city shall be determined by deducting any credit from the amount of the assessment . IX. To evidence the several sums assessed against the respective parcels of abutting property and the owners thereof , and the time and terms of payment, and to aid in their enforcement and collection, the city shall issue, upon completion and acceptance of the project, assignable certificates in the amount of the respective assessment less any credits allowed. The certificates shall be executed in the name of the city by the Mayor, attested by the City Secretary, and impressed with corporate seal of the city. The certificate shall be payable to the City of Fort Worth or its assigns, and shall declare the amounts, time and terms of payment , rate of interest , and the date of the completion and acceptance of the improvements abutting the parcel of property for which the certificate is issued. Moreover, the certificate shall contain the name of the owner or owners, if known, and the description of the property by lot and block number, front feet, or as may otherwise identify the property. Property owned in the name of an estate may be assessed in that name. No error or mistake in describing any property, or in giving the name of any owner shall invalidate or impair the certificate for the assessments levied. The certificate shall provide that if it is not paid promptly upon maturity, it shall be collectable, with reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection. In addition, the certificate shall provide that the amount evidenced in it shall be paid to the Assessor and Collector of Taxes of the City of Fort Worth, who shall issue a receipt as evidence of payment. The Assessor and Collector of Taxes shall deposit the sums he receives with the City Treasurer to be kept and held in a separate fund. After any payment on a certificate is made to the city, the Assessor and Collector of Taxes, upon presentation of the certificate, shall endorse the certificate to show the payment. If a certificate is assigned, the holder shall be entitled to receive from the City Treasurer the amount paid by presentation of the certificate endorsed and credited, and the endorsement and credit shall be the Treasurer's Warrant for making the payment. The payments by the City Treasurer shall be receipted for the holder of the certificate in writing and by surrender when the principal , together with accrued interest and all costs of collection and reasonable attorney's fees, have been paid. The certificate shall further recite that the proceedings for making the improvement were held in compliance with the law, and that all prerequisites for fixing the assessment lien against the property described in certificate and against personal liability of the owners have been completed. The recitals shall be prima facie evidence of all matters recited in the certificates, and no further proof shall be required in any court. -4- The certificates may have coupons attached to evidence any installment or may have coupons for (i) each of the first four installments, leaving the main certificate to serve as the fifth installment coupon, (ii) or each of the first 48 installments, leaving the main certificate to serve as the 49th installment coupon. The coupons may be payable to the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns. The certificates may be signed with the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Secretary. The certificates shall also recite that the city shall exercise all powers to aid in the enforcement and collection of the certificate. Recitals need not be in any exact form, but in substantial compliance with this ordinance. X. The city has power to make and levy assessments and to correct mistakes, errors, invalidities or irregularities, either in the assessments or in the certificates. XI . All assessments levied are a personal liability and charge against the owners of the property described in Exhibit "A", even though the owners may not be named or may be incorrectly named. Failure to make improvements in front of an abutting property that is exempt from assessment will not invalidate the lien or liability for assessments made against other abutting property. XII . The assessments levied are for the improvements in the particular unit upon which the respective parcels of property abut, and the assessments for the improvements in any unit are not affected by the assessments or improvements in any other unit. In making assessments and in holding the benefit hearing, the amounts assessed for improvements in any one unit have not been connected with the improvements or assessments for improvements in any orher unit. MI . The assessments are levied under the provisions of TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. ANN. art. 1105b (Vernon 1964) , which statute has been adopted as an amendment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth. XIV. The City Secretary is directed to file this Ordinance in the appropriate Records of the City. XV. The ordinance shall take effect and be in full force after the date of its passage, and it is so ordained. -5- PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 19 . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: r PityAttorney Date:---------------------------- Adopted:I—aA- -_q/b--------- Effective:----------------------- -6- P, ApgSO yl O 13 i I Apg5 I •` + p,M 1 aaav 1(. g2p ] a• • •I u bpbp ) r. • 5 �p EIIZMUOM EIIZ,.uL.l St • 1• sSSpy y aq • w '�� ) 7 I•.a ] • , ) n-• �.,).� • v w' u • w r: 4E� p4 P t ,y • v i•t • { a a e • t7 c a•� -5 ] •�' \2e2p bpbp 1 ''12b0 ,•'121p n 1; ] i r ra • • ( .c N )o ♦rt to s r o- • 12b`'{ u e i A,/./I r 0°SE S //// -TOWS S i. /1/t.//,~/I r o••l S S] A, a��\ y a• K 1 \S ,7,] Y u �1 • M` ♦ 1• I ool O- K 7 lI K •_ ( 1 1 • { a r • 1 ,7 ,]r-•)- 1 r E. 1 — u(, 1 ( • y • I ,• N o u N a-• . Is n f] 1 y ,• a a )• » a 7 if ,a,) i 7•• S R M N+ • to 11, ,1 t N {-• w it n ) • • 1• 1 I 0 \282 A • w v 11 1• ( L..y a v iv{rsav >. 6S •1.71rr.� ( + E q , 28 \ 1. �+-] _ ZIc .0 o 1 I I•rtrE(r 7 • • •a v . { 7 7 1 ] ], ]e , s e �7 BERRY Sl. EAST BERRY Sr IT ECi..SY F'•(C��� t ] 7 � 1 • 1 ,1 ] ,1 a t• /7 t � •_`[ ]-• _ 0 Ia-( ��� a• ]-• B FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND FROM RUFUS STREET TO MILLER AVENUE PROJECT NO. 67-040273,11-040273 EXHIBIT A JUNE 1992 FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND FROM RUFUS STREET TO MILLER AVENUE PROJECT NO. 67-040273, 11-040273 CITY ASSESSMENT PAVING POLICY The Assessment Pavinq Policy establishes four methods of determininq assessments. Under this policy assessments cannot exceed: (a) The computed rate. (b) The enhancement to the property. (c) For residential property; twenty percent (20%) of the property values as determined by the Tarrant Appraisal District. (d) For commercial property located within a target area; forty percent (40%) of the property values as determined by the Tarrant Appraisal District. All replacement of sidewalks is at 50% cost to the property owner and 50% cost to the City. -1- PROJECT NO. .6'7-040273/11-040273, FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND. FROM RUFUS STREET TO MILLER AVENUE, to be improved by constructing a six-inch thick reinforced concrete pavement with a seven-inch high attached concrete curb on a six-inch thick lime stabilized subgrade so that the finished roadway will be thirty feet wide on a fifty foot width Right-of-Way. Six-inch thick reinforced concrete driveway approaches and four-inch thick concrete sidewalks will be constructed where shown on the plans. OWNER & LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- BEGINNING AT CAMPBELL STREET ---------------------------- ------------------------- NORTH SIDE PROPERTY #1 ------------- 000000869589 KEVIN M JONES 145.00'FRONTAGE 2763 MEADOW GATE LN B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1844.00 DALLAS TX 75237 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 BLK 33 LOT D 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $13,186 = $2, 637 2251.78 2251.78 ENHANCEMENT 5800 .00 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING RESIDENT (1) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000869600 PROPERTY #2 JACQUELYN A WALKER 3613 FORBES ST B 65.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 599.30 FT WORTH TX 76105 49.00'CURB 0.94 46.06 BLK 33 LOT E 148.20'SF DR APPR 2.35 348. 27 20% TAD OF $14,050 = $2 ,810 993.63 993.63 ENHANCEMENT 2600.00 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING RESIDENT (2)(3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000869643 PROPERTY #3 MARTHA A DAVISON 4931 BLACK OAK LN B 71 .00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1309.24 FT WORTH TX 76114 71 .00'CURB 1.87 132.77 BLK 33 LOT 4C 93. 95'SF DR APPR 3. 21 301. 58 20% TAD OF $13 ,509 = $2 ,701 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85. 60 1829.19 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1786.39 1786.39 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 2840.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT -2- OWNER & LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000869635 PROPERTY #4 CHARLES A JR ETUX ANNETTA LEE 130.00'FRONTAGE 3038 BRIGHTS ST B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1844.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 BLK 33 LOT 4B 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $18,040 = $3,608 2251.78 2251.78 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 5200.00 RESIDENT (1) BRIGHT STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000003125874 PROPERTY #5 WILLIAM H ALLEN 136.00'FRONTAGE 3041 BRIGHT ST B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1844.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 LOT N 93.95'SF DR APPR 2. 35 220.78 20% TAD OF $22,279 = $4,455 220.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 470.80 2722.58 LESS CREDIT 235.40 ------------ 2487 .18 2487.18 THOMAS, C B SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 5440.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (1) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000003125882 PROPERTY #6 CHARLES W & ALICE M CARPENTER 3663 FORBES ST B 65.00'PAVEMENT 9. 22 599.30 FT WORTH TX 76105 65.00'CURB 0.94 61.10 LOT 0 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $29,818 = $5,963 224.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 479.36 1360.54 LESS CREDIT 239.68 ------------ 1120.86 1120.86 THOMAS, C B SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2600.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (3) -3- OWNER b LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000003125785 PROPFRTY #7 BALDOMERO RAMIREZ 3667 FORBES ST B 50.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 461.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 50.00'CURB 0.94 47 .00 LOT F 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $21,595 = $4,319 156.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 333.84 1062.62 LESS CREDIT 166.92 ------------ 895.70 895.70 THOMAS, C B SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2000.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000003125793 PROPERTY #8 SECRETARY OF HUD % DEPT OF HOUSING PO BOX 2905 B 50.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 922.00 FT WORTH TX 76113 50.00'CURB 1.87 93.50 LOT G 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $21,730 = $4,346 156.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 333.84 1570.12 LESS CREDIT 166.92 ------------ 1403.20 1403.20 THOMAS, C B SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2000.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000003125807 PROPERTY #9 JAMES SLOVAK ETUX PATRICIA 618 LYNNFIELD B 50.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 922.00 ARLINGTON TX 76014 50.00'CURB 1.87 93.50 LOT H 132.70'SF DR APPR 2.35 311.85 20% TAD OF $24,539 = $4,907 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 1412.95 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1370.15 1370.15 THOMAS, C B SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2000.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT -4- OWNER & LEGAL' DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000003125815 PROPERTY #10 ROY MCHAN 3679 FORBES ST B 55.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 507 . 10 FT WORTH TX 76105 39.00'CURB 0.94 36. 66 LOT I 20% TAD OF $23,249 = $4,649 543.76 543.76 THOMAS, C B SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2200.00 RESIDENT (2)(3) RUFAS STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000004850912 PROPERTY #11 PATSY H DAWSON 48.00'FRONTAGE 3725 FORBES ST B 30.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 276.60 FT WORTH TX 76105 30.00'CURB 0.94 28. 20 BLK 37 LOT 4AR 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $33,942 = $6,788 525.58 525.58 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 1920.00 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000004850130 PROPERTY #12 JEFF W HUNTER 3801 FORBES ST B 67 .00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1235. 48 FT WORTH TX 76105 51.00'CURB 1.87 95.37 BLK 3 LOT 1R 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $24,922 = $4,984 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 1637 .23 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1594. 43. 1594.43 BYRD, L S SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2680.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (2) -5- OWNER b LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000395285 PROPERTY #13 SANDRA J HAYES 3805 FORBES ST B 52.50'PAVEMENT 9.22 484.05 FT WORTH TX 76105 52.50'CURB 0.94 49. 35 BLK 3 LOT 2 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $24,046 = $4,809 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 839.78 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 796.98 796.98 BYRD, L S SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2080.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000395293 PROPERTY #14 RFL INC PO BOX 15852 B 52.50'PAVEMENT 18.44 968.10 FT WORTH TX 76119 52.50'CURB 1.87 98.18 BLK 3 LOT 3 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $25,282 = $5,056 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 1372.66 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1329.86 1329.86 BYRD, L S SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2080.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000395307 PROPERTY #15 DOUGLAS E 6 BETTY BOWMAN 3813 FORBES ST B 52.50'PAVEMENT 18.44 968.10 FT WORTH TX 76105 52.50'CURB 1.87 98.18 BLK 3 LOT 4 93.59'SF DR APPR 2.35 219.94 20% TAD OF $25,470 = $5,094 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 1371.82 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1329.02 1329.02 BYRD, L S SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2080.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT -6- OWNER b LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000870463 PROPERTY #16A NATION CONSTRUCTION CO INC 3016 DONALEE ST B 39.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 719.16 FT WORTH TX 76105 39.00'CURB 1.87 72. 93 BLK 39 WPT LT A 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $4,000 = $800 1012 .87 1012.87 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 1560.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000870455 PROPERTY #16B BARBARA SANFORD SLOAN 158.00'FRONTAGE 2424 WINTON TER E B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1844.00 FT WORTH TX 76109 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 BLK 39 EPT LT A 20% TAD OF $20,577 = $4,115 2031 .00 2031.00 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 6320.00 RESIDENT (1) DONALEE STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676273 PROPERTY #17 JOHNNY ETUX RUBY DAVIS 186.00'FRONTAGE 5532 FITZHUGH AVE B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1844.00 FT WORTH TX 76119 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 BLK 4 LOT 15 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220 .78 20% TAD OF $21,656 = $4,331 400.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 856.00 3107 .78 LESS CREDIT 428.00 ------------ 2679. 78 2679.78 SAN ROE ADDITION 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 7440.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (1) -7- WNER b LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------ ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- --------------------------- ------------------------- )00002676281 PROPERTY #18 DILL HENRY INGRAM JR 3913 FORBES ST B 50.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 922.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 50.00'CURB 1.87 93.50 13LK 4 LOT 16 93. 95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $40,904 = $8,180 1236.28 1236.28 SAN ROE ADDITION 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 2000.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676303 PROPERTY #19 ROBERT J JR ETUX M HORNBUCKLE 3917 FORBES ST B 50.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 461.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 50.00'CURB 0.94 47.00 BLK 4 LOT 17 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $54,030 = $10,806 728.78 728.78 SAN ROE ADDITION 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 2000.00 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676311 PROPERTY #20 MACK D ALLEN JR 3921 FORBES ST B 50.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 922.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 50.00'CURB 1.87 93.50 BLK 4 LOT 18 93. 95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $18,268 = $3,653 1236.28 1236.28 SAN ROE ADDITION 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 2000.00 RESIDENT -8- OWNER b LEGAL• 'DESCRI'PTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------ ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- --------------------------- ------------------------- )00002676346 PROPERTY #21 :LVIS R MARSHALL 1931 FORBES ST B 57 .00'PAVEMENT 9.22 525.54 !T WORTH TX 76105 57 .00'CURB 0. 94 53. 58 3LK 4 LOT 19 93. 95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $24,971 = $4,994 799.90 799.90 3AN ROE ADDITION 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 2280.00 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676605 PROPERTY #22 ASBERRY JEFFERSON 4001 FORBES ST B 60.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1106. 40 FT WORTH TX 76105 60.00'CURB 1.87 112. 20 BLK 4 LOT 13B 140.45'SF DR APPR 2.35 330.06 20% TAD OF $36,978 = $7 ,395 1548. 66 1548.66 SAN ROE ADDITION 3RD FILING ENHANCEMENT 2400.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676591 PROPERTY #23 FRANK P SR ETUX LULA C HARRIS 135.00'FRONTAGE 2924 FREDDIE ST B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18. 44 1844.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 BLK 4 LOT 13A 155.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 366.48 20% TAD OF $34,212 = $6,842 2397 . 48 2397.48 SAN ROE ADDITION 3RD FILING ENHANCEMENT 5400.00 RESIDENT (1) -9- DWNER 6 LEGAL' DESCR•IPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT .ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- FREDDIE STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000004692942 PROPERTY #24 JAMES E EPPS ETUX OLIVIA G 120.00'FRONTAGE 4601 BURTON AVE B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1844.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 BLK 1 LOT 10A 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $3,000 = $600 2251 .78 2251.78 SAN ROE ADDITION 3RD FILING ENHANCEMENT 4800.00 RESIDENTIAL VACANT (1) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676397 PROPERTY #25 SALES 0 ETUX RUBY D TUBBS 4017 FORBES ST B 75.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 691. 50 FT WORTH TX 76105 75.00'CURB 0.94 70.50 BLK 1 LOT 10B 20% TAD OF $15,853 = $3,170 762.00 762.00 SAN ROE ADDITION 3RD FILING ENHANCEMENT 3000.00 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002675870 PROPERTY #26 WILBERT THOMPSON 2116 LANGSTON ST B 125.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 2305.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 125.00'CURB 1 .87 233.75 BLK 1 LOT 9 93. 95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $25,349 = $5,069 2759. 53 2759.53 SAN ROE ADDITION 1ST FILING ENHANCEMENT 5000.00 RESIDENT -10- RNER 6 LEGAL- bESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT AS ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- --------------------------- ------------------------- 00002675935 PROPERTY #27 ENRY J JACKSON JR 101 FORBES ST B 120.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 1106.40 T WORTH TX 76105 120.00'CURB 0.94 112.80 LK 2 LOT 9 0% TAD OF $15,162 = $3,032 1219.20 1219.20 -AN ROE ADDITION 1ST FILING ENHANCEMENT 4800.00 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- )00002675943 PROPERTY #28 iIKE HILL �ANSON FINANCIAL INC 114.00'FRONTAGE 10 BOX 79208 B 100.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1844.00 FT WORTH TX 76179 100.00'CURB 1.87 187 .00 3LK 2 LOT 10 20% TAD OF $24,012 = $4,802 2031.00 2031.00 SAN ROE ADDITION 1ST FILING ENHANCEMENT 4560.00 RESIDENT (1) BEGINNING AT MILLER STREET ---------------------------- ------------------------- SOUTH SIDE PROPERTY #29 ------------- 000002677059 ADDIE MAE ROGERS 112.50'FRONTAGE 3000 MILLER AVE B 100.00'PAVEMENT 9. 22 922.00 FT WORTH TX 76105 100.00'CURB 0.94 94.00 BLK 3 LOT 7 148.20'SF DR APPR 2.35 348.27 20% TAD OF $24,131 = $4,826 1364.27 1364.27 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 4480.00 RESIDENT (1)(3) -11- -)WNER 6 LEGAL" DESGR,IPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 300002677091 PROPERTY #30 ,AWRENCE RICHARDSON 4104 FORBES ST B 57.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1051.08 FT WORTH TX 76105 57.00'CURB 1.87 106.59 BLK 7R LOT 2R 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $21,744 = $4,348 1378.45 1378.45 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2280.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002677083 PROPERTY #31 MELVIN BROWN 4100 FORBES B 57.00'PAVEHENT 9.22 525.54 FT WORTH TX 76105 57.00'CURB 0.94 53.58 BLK 7R LOT 1R 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $25,078 = $5,015 799.90 799. 90 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2280.00 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676761 PROPERTY #32 HOBERT PHILLIPS 4025 E BERRY ST B 57.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 525.54 FT WORTH TX 76105 57.00'CURB 0.94 53.58 BLK 5 LOT 13 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $21,466 = $4,293 799.90 799.90 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2280.00 RESIDENT (3) -12- ,WNER b LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- --------------------------- ------------------------- )00002676753 PROPERTY #33 iOBERT PHILLIPS 1025 E BERRY ST B 57 .00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1051.08 -'T WORTH TX 76105 57 .00'CURB 1.87 106.59 UK 5 LOT 12 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $62,783 = $12,556 1378.45 3AN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2280.00 1378.45 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 300002676745 PROPERTY #34 ?AHMI A KHATIB 6302 BROOKGATE DR B 57.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1051.08 ARLINGTON TX 76016 57.00'CURB 1.87 106.59 BLK 5 LOT 11 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $15,472 = $3,094 1378.45 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2280.00 1378.45 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676699 PROPERTY #35 E BRYANT M JOHNSON 4026 FORBES ST B 51.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 470.22 FT WORTH TX 76105 51.00'CURB 0.94 47 . 94 BLK 5 LOT 8 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $31,860 = $6,372 738.94 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2040.00 738.94 RESIDENT (3) -13- )WNER 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT -------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- J00002676680 PROPERTY #36 PEARLIE M TOWNSHED 4024 FORBES ST B 51.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 940.44 FT WORTH TX 76105 51.00'CURB 1.87 95.37 BLK 5 LOT 7 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $28,246 = $5,649 1256.59 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2040 .00 1256.59 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676672 PROPERTY #37 CURTIS PRUITT 4020 FORBES ST B 51.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 470 .22 FT WORTH TX 76105 51.00'CURB 0.94 47 .94 BLK 5 LOT 6 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $22,464 = $4,492 738.94 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2040.00 738. 94 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676664 PROPERTY #38 JAMES R LAMPIN 208 BELLVUE DR B 51.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 940 . 44 FT WORTH TX 76134 51.00'CURB 1.87 95.37 BLK 5 LOT 5 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $17,860 = $3,572 40 .00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85. 60 1342.19 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1299.39 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2040.00 1299.39 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT -14- OWNER 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676656 PROPERTY #39 JOHN L WHITLEY 4012 FORBES ST B 51.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 940.44 FT WORTH TX 76105 51.00'CURB 1.87 95.37 BLK 5 LOT 4 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $21,861 = $4,372 1256.59 1256.59 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2040.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676648 PROPERTY #40 CHARLES E VILEY 4008 FORBES ST B 51.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 940.44 FT WORTH TX 76105 51 .00'CURB 1.87 95.37 BLK 5 LOT 3 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $17 ,846 = $3,569 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 1342.19 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1299.39 1299.39 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2040.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000002676621 PROPERTY #41 J D LIVINGSTON JR 4004 FORBES ST B 51.00'PAVEMENT 18. 44 940.44 FT WORTH TX 76105 51.00'CURB 1.87 95.37 BLK 5 LOT 2 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $18,226 = $3,645 1256.59 1256.59 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2040.00 RESIDENT -15- )WNER 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- --------------------------- ------------------------- )00002676613 PROPERTY #42 :OSTER L ANDERSON 4000 FORBES ST B 58.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1069. 52 FT WORTH TX 76105 58.00'CURB 1 .87 108 .46 BLK 5 LOT 1 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 20% TAD OF $26,568 = $5,313 1263.58 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1220.78 1220.78 SAN ROE ADDITION 4TH FILING ENHANCEMENT 2320.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT NOE STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000001871595 PROPERTY #43 HERMAN E PENNINGTON 200 W WOODBINE B 62.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1143. 28 BEDFORD TX 76021 62.00'CURB 1.87 115. 94 BLK 2 LOT 6A 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $22,585 = $4,517 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85. 60 1565.60 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1522.80 NOE ADDITION ENHANCEMENT 2480.00 1522.80 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000001871609 PROPERTY #44 JESSEE CUMMINGS 3920 FORBES ST B 60.00'PAVEMENT 18. 44 1106.40 FT WORTH TX 76105 60.00'CURB 1.87 112. 20 BLK 2 LOT 6B 93. 95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $23,800 = $4,760 1439.38 NOE ADDITION ENHANCEMENT 2400.00 1439.38 RESIDENT -16- WNER 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------ ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- --------------------------- ------------------------- �00001871617 PROPERTY #45 iETRO AFFORDABLE iOMES INC 1164 COUNTRY CLUB LN B 60 .00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1106.40 FT WORTH TX 76112 60.00'CURB 1.87 112 .20 3LK 2 LOT 6C 93. 95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $32,715 = $6,543 1439.38 1439.38 NOE ADDITION ENHANCEMENT 2400.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000004424735 PROPERTY #46 JULIAN CHASE 3908 FORBES ST B 55.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1014.20 FT WORTH TX 76105 55.00'CURB 1.87 102 .85 BLK 2 LOT 1E 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $25,000 = $5,000 1337.83 1337.83 NOE ADDITION ENHANCEMENT 2200.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000004424727 PROPERTY #47 MIKE FERGUSON PO BOX 79208 B 55.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1014. 20 FT WORTH TX 76179 55.00'CURB 1.87 102.85 BLK 2 LOT 1D 93. 95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $22,500 = $4,500 1337 .83 NOE ADDITION ENHANCEMENT 2200.00 1337.83 RESIDENT -17- OWNER 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000004424719 PROPERTY #48 ROBERT E GARRETT 3001 DONALEE ST B 75.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 691.50 FT WORTH TX 76105 59.00'CURB 0 .94 55.46 BLK 2 LOT 1C 320.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 684.80 20% TAD OF $19,075 = $3,815 1431.76 LESS CREDIT 342.40 ------------ 1089.36 NOE ADDITION ENHANCEMENT 3000.00 1089.36 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (2)(3) DONALEE STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000000870536 PROPERTY #49 OCCIE LEE DAVIS 3016 DONALEE ST B 410.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 7560.40 FT WORTH TX 76105 388.00'CURB 1.87 725.56 BLK 40 LOTS 1 , 6 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $16, 397 = $3,279 1596.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 3415.44 11922.18 LESS CREDIT 1707.72 ------------ 10214.46 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 16400.00 3279.00 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (2) SYDNEY STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000001845225 PROPERTY #50 CARL MCHAN 3676 FORBES ST B 96.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 885.12 FT WORTH TX 76105 85.00'CURB 0.94 79.90 LOT A-B 187.90'SF DR APPR 2.35 441.57 20% TAD OF $16,420 = $3,284 1406.59 1406.59 MC CULLOCH, BW SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 3840.00 RESIDENT (2)(3) -18- OWNER 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------------- ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000001845233 PROPERTY #51 CARL MCHANN 3676 FORBES ST B 52.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 958.88 FT WORTH TX 76105 52.00'CURB 1.87 97.24 LOT C 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $10,003 = $2,000 1276.90 1276.90 MC CULLOCH, BW SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2080.00 RESIDENT ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000001845241 PROPERTY #52 A J ETUX DOLORES GREEN 3668 FORBES ST B 52.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 479.44 FT WORTH TX 76105 52.00'CURB 0.94 48.88 LOT D 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $24,649 = $4,929 749.10 749.10 MC CULLOCH, BW SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 2080.00 RESIDENT (3) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000001878581 PROPERTY #53 OTIS E JOHNSON 3662 FORBES ST B 90.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 829.80 FT WORTH TX 76105 90.00'CURB 0.94 84.60 LOT D 93.95'SF DR APPR 2.35 220.78 20% TAD OF $20,691 = $4,138 1135. 18 1135.18 NORRIS, FANNIE LEE SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 3800.00 RESIDENT (3) -19- )WNER b LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING FRONTAGE RATE AMOUNT ASSESSMENT ------------------- ------ ------ -------- ---- ------ ---------- �RIGHT STREET INTERSECTS ---------------------------- ------------------------- 300000869856 PROPERTY #54 3ETTY DEGRATE 201 .00'FRONTAGE 3037 BRIGHT ST B 101.00'PAVEMENT 18.44 1862 .44 FT WORTH TX 76105 101 .00'CURB 1.87 188.87 BLK 34 LOT 6A 109.45'SF DR APPR 2.35 257 .21 20% TAD OF $12,273 = $2,454 2308.52 2308.52 ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND FILING ENHANCEMENT 8040.00 RESIDENT (1) ---------------------------- ------------------------- 000001780581 PROPERTY #55 TOMMY C ETUX SYLVIA MAYS 210.00'FRONTAGE 3101 CAMPBELL ST B 110.00'PAVEMENT 9.22 1014.20 FT WORTH TX 76105 110.00'CURB 0.94 103.40 LOT A 93.95'SF DR APPR 2 .35 220.78 20% TAD OF $33,260 = $6,652 40.00'SF SDWK(R) 2.14 85.60 1423.98 LESS CREDIT 42.80 ------------ 1381.18 MILLER, T E SUBDIVISION ENHANCEMENT 8400.00 1381.18 ADJUSTED:RESIDENT (1) (3) -20- FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND FROM RUFUS STREET TO MILLER AVENUE PROJECT NO. 67-040273, 11-040273 COST DISTRIBUTION A. COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 79,244.52 B. COST TO THE CITY OF FORT WORTH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$329,812.48 Street Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$292,625.48 Enqr. Insp./Admin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 37 ,187 .00 (10% of Estimate $371,870.00) C. TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$409,057 .00 NOTES (1) Sidelot Credit. Credit is qiven for the second 100 feet of sidelot frontage. (2) Curb inlet credit. (3) Homestead rate. A homestead rate is applied to properties with a homestead credit as noted on the Tarrent Appraisal District tax records. -21- UAS-ER f10E•! = City of Fort Worth, Texas -ccounnnG•z "RAr15PUN1AV,0N1Y0 for and CounCHCommunication DATE REFERE 5 JWNBER 7L , NAME PAGE LAW-- 09/29/92 BH-01 t evised) 20BHFORB 1 of 2 ►,�; , SUBJECT BENEFIT HEARING FOR THE ASSESSMENT PAVING OF FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND FROM RUFUS STREET TO MILLER AVENUE (PROJECT NO. / 2J 67-040273 AND 11-040273 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt an ordinance that: 1. Closes the benefit hearing, and 2. Levies the assessments as proposed, and 3. Acknowledges that in each case the abutting property is specially benefitted in enhanced value in excess of the amount assessed for the improvement of Forbes Street from Campbell Avenue to Sydney Street and from Rufus Street to Miller Avenue. DISCUSSION: The 1986 Capital Improvement Program included funds for the improvement of Forbes Street from Donalee Street to Miller Avenue. Forbes Street from Campbell Avenue to Sydney Street and from Rufus Street to Donalee Street was included in the 1990 Capital Improvement Program. The portion of Forbes from Sydney Street to Rufus Street is maintainable and will be resurfaced through the Contract Street Maintenance Program. Upon completion, Forbes Street from Campbell Avenue to Miller Avenue will be upgraded to City standards. The street is not located within a target area and has never been constructed to City standards. On September 15, 1992 (M&C BH-0107) , the City Council opened the benefit hearing for this project. In response to presentations from owners of property on the street, Council requested staff to work with Housing and Human Services to determine if Community Development Block Grant funds could be utilized to offset assessments on this project. Investigations by the H&HS staff indicated that the street qualifies for CDBG funding, and the roll has been revised to eliminate assessments against residential property. Forbes Street will be constructed with standard concrete curbs and pavement including driveways and sidewalks. 0 Printed on recycled paper City of Fort Worth, Texas Mayor and Council Communication DATE 09/29/92 1 IIEFEREM-010 B evised) L NAME 20BHFORB PAGE 2 of 2 SUBJECT BENEFIT HEARING FOR THE ASSESSMENT PAVING OF FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND FROM RUFUS STREET TO MILLER AVENUE (PROJECT NO. 67-040273 AND 11-040273 On August 11, 1992 (M&C G-9779) , the City Council established September 15, 1992, as the date of the benefit hearing. Notice was given in accord with Article 1105b, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes. An independent appraiser has provided a report that documents the enhancement to property values which results from the improvements. Based on standard City policy, the City Engineer's estimate, and the advice of the independent appraiser, the division of estimated construction cost is: Property owners' share of cost $ 1 ,400.00 ( 1%) City's share of cost $407,657.00 ( 99%) Total cost $409,057.00 (100%) There are no unusual situations on this project that require special City Council consideration. The project is in DISTRICT 5. MG:j Submitted for City Manager's FUND ACCOUNT CENTER AMOUNT CITY SECRETARY Office by: to Mike Groomer 6140 =-r Originating Department Head: Gary Santerre 7804 from For Additional Information .� pied ram[10E,NO./ Contact: Gary Santerre 7804 0 Printed on recycled paper Robert Martin Appraiser Postal Box 1831 642-9272 Grand Prairie,Texas 75051 533-0862 (Mobile) June 23, 1992 Mr. Theodore P. Gorski, Jr. Office of the City Attorney City of Fort Worth Fort Worth, Texas RE: PROJECT NO. 67-040273/11-040273, FORBES STREET FROM CAMPBELL AVENUE TO SYDNEY STREET AND FROM RUFUS STREET TO MII.LER AVENUE, to be improved by constructing a six-inch thick reinforced concrete pavement with a seven-inch high attached concrete curb on a six-inch thick lime stabilized subgrade so that the finished roadway will be thirty feet wide on a fifty foot width Right-of-Way. Six-inch thick reinforced concrete driveway approaches and four-inch thick concrete sidewalks will be constructed where shown on the plans. Dear Mr. Gorski: In accordance with your request and authorization,we have completed a study of the above captioned property/project for the purpose of estimating the market enhancement and special benefit (if any) to the unencumbered fee simple title of the subject property. The appraiser was instructed to determine if any special benefit could be found that would reflect in a valuation enhancement to the subject property.If any special benefit were found, it was understood that the City of Fort Worth would levy a special assessment against the property. If there is evidence of adequate probative force to constitute the belief that the parcel value would increase because of the imposition of the municipal improvement, then the decision to assess the owner of record for the improvements would be justified. In contrast, if there is not enough evidence to constitute adequate proof that the parcel value would increase because of the municipal improvement, then the decision to assess the owner of record for the improvements would not be justified. The following summary report sets forth our findings and conclusions. This information was derived from gathered factual data, supporting documents considered essential to explain the reasoning followed in malting the study, and the conclusions herein represented. Member National Association of Master Appraisers r SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS THE ISSUE OF SPECIAL BENEFIT When conducting an enhancement study, the primary issue that must be addressed is of a legal nature--specifically, Special Benefits to the Subject Property. This type of appraisal assignment differs from the assignments normally undertaken by real estate appraisers. (See Martin & Ordway, Enhancement Studies: Valuation or Evaluation; The Appraisal Journal. October, 1985) Article 1105B of Vernon's Ann. Tex. Civil St authorizes cities to improve their streets and to apportion the cost thereof between the City and owners of property abutting the streets to be improved, subject to certain limitations and to levy assessments against the abutting property and its true owners and to create liens against such property for the cost thereof apportioned to such property. The statute goes on to say... "no assessment shall be made against any abutting property or owners thereof in excess of the special benefits of such property, and its owners in the enhanced value thereof by means of such improvements as determined .." THE THREE QUESTIONS OF SPECIAL BENEEI'T WHAT IS A SPECIAL BENEFIT? Since 1933, Texas courts have defined special benefit in the following manner. "Such benefits as have accrued specially to this property, by reason of the street improvement in question when completed and made available for use, and which are not shared in generally by the whole community." On of Dallas v. Firestone Mn & Rubber Co.; 66 SW d 729. This means that the owner's opportunity to use the improved street is a shared or general benefit. In contrast, if the value of the property is enhanced and the owner is financially enriched by the improvement, this is a benefit limited strictly to the owner of the property.Thus, this represents a special benefit to the owner. EMxwvnmt Report Pq e 2 A Special Benefit was found in this case. WHEN WR L THE BENEFIT TAKE PLACE? This is often an important point of contention Property owners frequently argue: "My property will not increase immediately in value so I shouldn't have to pay for the street!" FM v. Lockhart wrestled with this problem and determined... 'reasonable probabilities for future use, either by the owner or by others, if sufficiently near in time and definite in kind to be of practical important may be considered.' The Page court turned to an Iowa case for further guidance On re Paving Streets in Floyd Park Addition, Sioux City! 196 NW 597 Cad 5"). "Indeed, the benefits to be derived in such cases are ordinarily not instant upon the inception or completion of the improvement, but materialize with the developments of the future. They are none the less benefits because their full fruition is postponed, or because the present use to which the property is devoted is not of a character to be materially affected by the improvement." The Special Benefit will accrue within this legal time period. HOW IS A SPECIAL BENEFIT DETERMINED? In order to determine a special benefit, the appraiser looks to another Texas case, FW v. Cily of Lockhart (397 SWd 113). The court gives the following instruction: Me benefit is found by deciding how much has been added to the fair market value of the property,where such property has a fair market value, and where it has no market value...by deciding how much has been added to the fair value of its property with reference to all the uses to which it is reasonably adapted and for which it is available." F,nhvncenkw Report Page 3 What the court is telling the appraiser is: o The appraiser must make every effort to determine the existence of an enhanced value via a comparison of market comparable method in a before and after condition; o If the market is devoid of such comparable data, evidence may be presented of increased utility to the property from the municipal improvement. Thus, increased property utility can be meet the standard of proof to justify a finding of enhanced benefit. These legal guidelines have been applied to the instant problem with the following findings. CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS OF THIS REPORT The effective date of this appraisal is June 23, 1992. The purpose of the study is to determine if an enhancement has occurred to the subject site due to a municipal improvement project. The appraiser was instructed to determine if any special benefit could be found that would reflect in a valuation enhancement to the subject property.If any special benefit were found, it was understood that the City of Fort Worth would levy a special assessment against the property. Enhancement Report Page 4 12EFINMON OF VALUE APPLIED IN THE INSTANT ANALYSIS Market Value is defined by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board in Memorandum #R41-c (September 11, 1986) as: THE MOST PROBABLE PRICE WHICH A PROPERTY SHOULD BRING IN A COMPETITIVE AND OPEN NVIARKET UNDER ALL CONDITIONS REQUISITE TO A FAIR SALE, THE BUYER AND SELLER, EACH ACTING PRUDENTLY, KNOWLEDGEABLY,AND ASSUMING THE PRICE IS NOT AFFECTED BY UNDUE MMULUS. IMPLICIT IN THIS DEFINITION IS THE CONSUMMATION OF A SALE AS OF A SPECIFIED DATE AND THE PASSING OF TITLE FROM SELLER TO BUYER UNDER CONDITIONS WHEREBY: 1. Buyers and sellers are typically motivated; 2. Both parties are well informed and/or well advised, and each is acting in what he considers his best interest; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. The price represents a normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. While courts and other institutions may use a slightly different definition of market value, the common elements of all definitions of market value are found in the above definition. Enhan wkw Report Page 5 FACTS SUPPORTING THE CONCLUSION TO ASSESS The current zoning on the parcels in this study is: "B" Two-Family District This classification allows the uses outlined in the Zoning Ordinances of the City of Fort Worth,Texas. There are no current alternative uses legally available that would return a greater present value to the owners than the current uses of the property. Studies of similar properties in Tarrant County indicate a greater utility and thus, a greater value for properties located on improved roads. THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL In the Highest and Best Use Analysis of the subject property, the appraiser has considered possible use for the site, those uses which are permitted by zoning and deed restrictions, if any; and those possible and permissible uses which will produce the highest net return to the owner of the site under current and projected market conditions. The size and shape of the subject site physically restricts the land to a limited number of uses, and the current zoning legally limits the land to a use as denoted in the attached SLTMIVIARY. There are no indications of any pending zoning change in the foreseeable future. The neighborhood is primarily improved with mixed use development. No land use change is anticipated for the subject parcels. Some of the neighborhood properties are declining in utility but renovation and rebuilding can be observed in the neighborhood. Predominate neighborhood land uses are a residential and commercial mix. Located on Forbes Street, the sites have residential appeal. A variety of land uses are evident to the appraiser. No significant land use changes are anticipated in the foreseeable future. There appears to be no adverse adjacent land uses that would affect the marketability of these tracts. Enhancement Report Page 6 9. Supply/Demand study of alternative land uses in the market area as expressed in marketing time: Ft. Worth Market Area Single Family: 6-9 Months 6-9 Months 2-4 Family: 12-18 Months 12-18 Months Multi Family: 12-18 Months 12-18 Months Commercial: 24 +/-Months 24 +/-Months 10. Availability of financing for alternative projects in market area: Financing is available to investors and owner/occupants in this neighborhood. The typical financing terms seem to be through owner financing at 80010 Loan-to-Value ratio for 15 to 20 years for commercial structures and 80-90% Loan-to-Value ratios for 15 to 30 years for residential structures. Interest rates range from are 10S% for the most creditworthy customers and range up to 18% plus for the less creditworthy. Proximity to commercial areas and major arterials indicate that demand for this location should exist into the foreseeable future if improvements are made to the transportational matrix. 11. Population trends in the market area: Population trends for the neighborhood are steady and pattern Ft.Worth's general growth rate. 12. Income trends in the market area: The area's disposable income is below that of the Tarrant County average. 13. Compatibility of land uses: The area is a patchwork of zoning and developmental trends. The immediate neighborhood is a mix of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The trend is toward commercial development with the residential properties in some decline. Enhancement Report Page 9 14. Site Characteristics of the subject tracts: See attached Plat (in addendum) for the size and dimensions of the subject properties. The plat indicates ingress/egress to the subject tracts. The sites are generally level and appear to be sufficiently graded for development purposes. There are no easements, right-of--way requirements, or encumbrances that adversely affect the marketability of these properties. Each site is under the Zoning Jurisdiction of the City of Fort Worth. 15. Locational Characteristics of the subject tracts: The neighborhood is located in the Eastern part of Fort Worth. The neighborhood can be defined by the following boundaries: Bounded on the North by: 130 Bounded on the West by: US 287 Bounded on the South by: US 287 Bounded on the East by: East Loop 820 Miller Avenue and Berry Street are the most heavily traveled arterials in the neighborhood The subject properties are located on Forbes Street and approximately 2 blocks North from the intersection of Miller Avenue and Berry Street. 16. Land values influencing the subject tract: Urban Land Use Patterns Very few cities start as planned developments with neat allocations of given areas for commercial, industrial, residential, and other uses. Instead the average city begins as a village and gradually expands. This growth process is often haphazard,poorly planned, and frequently expensive. As cities grow, they usually sprawl outward. Business districts spill over into surrounding residential areas. Sometimes this expansion has a relatively uniform effect on all the blocks surrounding the original beginning point of the city. Enhancement Report Page 10 Sometimes it is all in one direction or may follow a single street; and in some cases the central point of the city migrate to other more advantageous locations in the city. Industrial areas are also affected by this growth process. The original industrial sites-- ordinarily located near the outskirts of small cities— are soon engulfed by the growing city and frequently isolated from abutting areas that could have been used for plant expansion purposes. Spatial Relationships Affecting Land Use Land utilization patterns reflect locational differences in the market pricing mechanism that exists in urban land markets.This is particularly true when dealing with land areas of similar productive capacity located at different distances from the market. Transportation cost is the key factor in these cases. Since these costs ordinarily increase with distance, sites near a market usually enjoy a comparative advantage over sites located further away from the market center. Areas close to the market center accordingly receive higher prices for their land base than areas located at greater distances from the market center. Application to the Instant Problem... In the instant problem, there are few comparable sales located in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. However, if evidence exists in the market that validates the price of land at the most distant point from the central market, then this proof becomes the base price for the urban land market pricing. Appraising When There are No Comparable... Sluggish real estate sales have forced experts to rethink standard property appraisal methods. Appraising without benefit of comparable sales has been a dilemma since the infancy of the appraisal process. The problem is evident in times of rapid growth or in down, depressed markets. It is also evident in rural areas, developing suburbs, small towns, and inner city neighborhoods in transition. An economic decision must be made whether or not comparable sales are available. It is this appraiser's opinion that no convincing comparable sales were available to complete this appraisal assignment. When sales information is not available, then emphasis shifts to the appraisal process itself and to the buyer's decision making process. Enhancement Report Page 11 Appraisal can be done through simulation models generated in previous difficult markets, and modified to fit today's needs. One such model is the Land Residual Technique. This method assumes that the value of an actual or proposed building can be estimated separately. When the land residual method is used,building value is usually the current cost to construct a new building that represents the highest and best use of the land. The land residual technique helps an appraiser estimate land values when recent land sales data are unavailable. The technique can be applied to both proposed construction (to test the highest and best use of the land or site) or to new structures that do not suffer from accrued depreciation. An appraiser applies the building capitalization rate to the building value to obtain the amount of annual net income necessary to support the value of the building. This amount is then deducted from net operating income, indicating the residual income available to support the investment in the land. The residual income is capitalized at the land capitalization rate to derive an indication of the value of the land. Then building value is added to the land value to derive an indication of the total property value. The land and building capitalization rates are derived from the market and are applied to the subject property. The Land Residual method is an income capitalization technique. The income approach is particularly appropriate in today's down market. The income approach emphasizes the future benefits the property is expected to bring. It is based on the principle of anticipation, while standard appraisal techniques are based on the principal of substitution. The principle of substitution states that a purchaser will pay no more for a property than the cost of acquiring a similar property. In the past, appraisal has been an ad hoc process, in which the appraiser evaluates a particular property for the short term. As this down market has shown, appraisal consists of ongoing economic and market analysis. Preparation and recognition that market cycles are continuous are the keys to the professional appraisal approach. Determining Properly Values In the instant problem, there are few comparable sales located in the immediate vicinity of the subject properties. However, evidence was found in the market that validates the price of land at the most distant point from the central market. This figure becomes the base price for the urban land market. Further, this become the base price for land. Enhancmwu Report Page 12 It can be concluded that the base value of land in the Fort Worth urban land market today is approximately $5,000 to $17,000 per acre. This is for land with the following characteristics: o No Infrastructure Support (Streets, Water, Sewage) o No Established Zoning Pattern o Purchased for the Purpose of Speculation The Subject Parcel is Similar to Suburban Economic Influences Comparable sales of similar suburban properties were researched. From these sales, a range in price per square foot can be set: 1.03 to 1.80. Expressed in terms of acreage price, the range is: $45,000 to $78,400. This is for land with the following characteristics: o Infrastructure Support (Streets, Water, Sewage) o Established Zoning Pattern o Purchased for the Purpose of Speculation o Established Land Use Patterns o Available Infrastructure o Proven Development Characteristics o Established Transportational Conveniences Enhancement Repot Page 13 A comparative a matrix is presented below. Comparable Matrix Subject Distant Suburb. Established Zoning Pattern Yes No Yes Purchase Motivation Spec. Spec. Spec. Land Use Patterns Devel. No Devel. Infrastructure Yes No Yes Street Condition Margin No Supportive Proven Development Yes No Yes Transportational Conveniences Yes No Yes Price Per Square .12 to 39 1.03 to 1.80 Testing the Feasible Decision... The Land Residual method was applied in this study. This method assumes that the value of an actual or proposed improvement to the land can be estimated. Building value is usually the current cost to construct a new building that represents the highest and best use of the land. An appraiser applies a building capitalization rate to the building value to obtain the amount of annual net income necessary to support the value of the building. This amount is then deducted from net operating income, indicating the residual income available to support the investment in the land The residual income is capitalized at the land capitalization rate to derive an indication of the value of the land. This method was applied to the properties under study in this evaluation for enhancement. The results of this analysis supported the final decision that an enhancement was found in the indicated properties. Enhancanau Report Par 14 CERTIFICATION STATEMENTS The appraiser certifies that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct; 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions; 3. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; 4. My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, or conclusions in, or use oC this report; 5. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in accordance with the standards and reporting requirements of the Texas Real Estate Commission; 6. I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report; 7. No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report; 8. The amount of the fee is not contingent upon reporting a predetermined value or upon the amount of the value estimate; 9.The appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice and Conduct of the National Association of Master Appraisers; 10. I am currently certified under the mandatory continuing education program of the National Association of Master Appraisers. Enhancement Repot Page 17 1_ .►_ _� __ m - o I. , " c � ___ e o n 4 4 < y• • 'lr eo..r,p i�, c - °' •w r■ a• ^ x � Ls HOflOtl00 i 10 � f SI 9 �' T • • w • Sl ��� W31 000M3903 1 _ _ _ « w _ _ 4 SF > 1 w 1S S3H" _ C z �f of IL is S3H" IS H3H3ivH oo• W N - • W R - - r �'i Jam• - HS R n X •c°O«w f • ` - 'n 15 SOS b*J O is 31Vd on R _ F , - - - - N �=� 15 31vd Cl S • _ - s Qo n •uc `i°u Yw• Q �« • � Y - o Q iY ^ M F •■ (] _ y w w Q p • - • IS d3A01SV3 - • � � _ ■ c _ �d iO r 1 _ ■'np Fw a � i dN A ! 3 w 3sOtl nYs�� _ - • yz P w e C i a m 3 " jz- m is MaudIs 3rom-4 W lit x • w N� F �x • _ d o o I �, 0 X ■ --- 1S 30H s x + i = CC-=- r \ m W Cc SUMMARY CITY OF FORT WORTH SUMMARY OF ENHANCED PROJECT:FORBES STREET VALUES M R: 87- T 11-040273 80 1 PARCEL OWNER ADDITION g1 OCA I= IMPROVED FRONT ZQNINQ HARU VALUE VALUE INDICATED _FOOT BffMM _AFTER ENHANCEMENT 1. NES ENGLEWOOD 33 D RESIDENT 145 B TWO-FAM 11800 17400 2WALKER ENGLEWOOD 33 E RESIDENT 85 B TWO-FAM 5200 78DO 3. DAYIS0N ENGLEWOOD 33 4C RESIDENT 71 B TWO-FAM 6880 8520 4. LEE ENGLEWOOD 33 46 RESIDENT 130 B TWO-FA 10400 16800I:;77 5 b. N CB THOMAS N RESIDENT 136 B O- A 10880 18320 8. ENTER CB TNOMA3 O RESIDENT 65 B TWO-FA 52D0 7800 7. IREZ COTHOMAS F RESIDENT 50 B O-FA 4000 8000 8 H.U.D. CB THOMAS O RESIDENT 50 B TWO-FA 4000 8000 9. VAK CBTHOMAS H RESIDENT 50 B TWO-FA 4000 8000 10. CB THOMAS i RESIDENT 65 B TWO-FA 4400 8800 11. SON ENGLEWOOD 37 4AR RESIDENT 48 B TWO-FAA4 3840 6780 12. HUNTER LS BYRD 3 1R RESIDENT 87 B TWO-FA 5380 8040 209L► 13. HAYES LS BYRD 3 2 RESIDENT 521 B TWO-FA 41801 82M0 14. RFL INC. LS BYRD 3 3 1 RESIDENT 52 B TWO-FA& 4160 8240 16 BOWMAN LS BYRD 3 4 1 RESIDENT 52 B TWO-FA A 4180 8240 16. NATION CNST. ENGLEWOOD 39 W PT A RESIDENT 39 B TWO-FAA 3120 4880 16p0 17. SLOAN E LEWOOD : E PTA RESIDENT 158 a -FA 12540 16980 18 DVVIS SAN W 4 15 RESIDENT 188 B IWD--FAA 148W 22320 >: 19. INGRAM SAN ROE 4 18 RESIDENT so B TWO-FA TWO-FAA4 4000 8000 20. HORNSUCKLE SAN ROE 4 17 RESIDENT 50 B TWO-FA 4000 21. ALLEN SAN ROE 4 18 RESIDENT 5o B TWO-FA 4000 8000 :.'> :.>:6 22 MARSHALL SAN ROE 4 19 RESIDENT 57 B TWO-FA 4580 6840 23XFFERSON SAN ROE 4 13B RESIDENT 80 B TWO-FA 48D0 72D0 24. HARRIS SAN ROE 4 13A RESIDENT 135 B TWO-FA 10600 18200 6400 25 EPPS SAN ROE 1 10A VACANT 12D B TWO-FA 98D0 144p0 ::::: 26 SAN ROE 1 10B RESIDENT 75 B TWO-FA 8000 9000 27. THOMPSON SAN ROE 1 9 RESIDENT 125 B TWO-FAM 10000 15000 <:; 28. JACKSON SAN ROE 2 9 RESIDENT 12D B TWO-FAh4 9800 14400 4900 29 HILL SAN ROE 2 10 RESIDENT 114 B TWO-FAM 9120 13880 30. EFVSS ROE 3 T RESIDENT 112 B TWO- 14 8980 13440 31. RICHARDSON SAN ROE 7R 2R RESIDENT 57 B TWO-FAA4 45W 8840 3Z BROWN SAN ROE 7R 1R RESIDENT 57 B TWO-FAM 4500 8840 2280 33. PHILLIPS SAN ROE 5 13 RESIDENT 57 B TWO-FAM 45W 8840 34. P ILLIPS SAN ROE 5 12 RESIDENT 57 B TWO-FA 4560 8840 35 RHATIB SAN ROE 5 11 RESIDENT 57 B TWO-FA 45W 8840 36. JOHNSON SAN ROE 5 8 RESIDENT 51 B TWO-FA 4080 6120 2044 37. OWN H SAN ROE 5 7 RESIDENT 51 B TWO-FA 4080 6120 am 38 PRUITT SAN ROE 5 6 RESIDENT 51 B TWO-FA 4080 8120 39. LAMPIN SAN ROE 5 5 RESIDENT 51 B TWO-FA 4080 8120 40. WHL11.EY SAN ROE 5 4 RESIDENT 51 B TWO-FA 4090 8120 " ;:2m 41. SAN ROE 6 3 RESIDENT 51 B TWO-FA 4080 6120 i::`' 42. LIVINGSTON SAN ROE 5 2 RESIDENT 51 B TWO-FA 4080 6120 ::< 43. ANDERSON SAN ROE 5 1 RESIDENT 58 B TWO-FA 46W 8980 44. PENNINGTON NOE 2 8A RESIDENT 82 B TWO-FA 4980 7440 : : 2480 45 CUMMINGS NOE 2 8B RESIDENT 60 B TWO-FA 4800 72D0 48. METRO HOMES NOE 2 8C RESIDENT 80 B TWO-FA 48D0 72 00 47. CHASE NOE 2 1E RESIDENT 55 B TWO-FA 4400 I 8800 46. FERGUSON NOE 2 1D RESIDENT 55 B TWO-FA 44W 8800 49. GARRETr NOE 2 1C RESIDENT 75 TWO-FA 60DO 9000 b0. DAVISENGLEWOOD 40 1.8 RESIDENT 410 B TWO-FA 32800 4WW 51. MCHAN BW MCCULL A-B RESIDENT 96 B TWO-FA 7050 11520 :>- 300 51 MCHAN BW MCCULLO>f C RESIDENT 52 B TWO-FA 4180 8240 2080 53 BW MCCULLO>1 D RESIDENT 52 B TWO-FA 4160 8240 54. JO NSON FL NORRIS I D RESIDENT 90 B TWO-FAM 72D0 10800 55. DEGRATE I ENGLEWOOD 34 IGA RESIDENT 201 B TWO-FAM 18060 1 24120 80At1: 56. MAYS ITEMILLER I JA IFIESIDENT, 210 B TWO-FA 18600 I 25200 8400 NOTICE THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Notice is hereby given that the governing body of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, has determined and ordered it necessary that the following portion of Forbes Street,_ in the City of Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, be improved and that a portion of the cost of the improvement be specially assessed as a lien upon certain abutting property. The portion of Forbes Street to be improved is described specifically as: Forbes Street, from Campbell Avenue to Sydney Street and from Rufus Street to Miller Avenue, known and designated as Project No. 67-040273 and 11-020273. The properties to be assessed are described specifically as: ENGLEWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND_FILING Block 33 Lots 4B,4C,D,E Block 34 Lot 6A Block 37 Lot 4AR Block 39 WPT Lot A, EPT Lot A Block 40 Lots 1,6 THOMAS, C B SUBDIVISION Lots F,G,H,I ,N,O BYRD, L S_SUBDIVISION Block 3 Lots 1R,2,3,4 SAN ROE ADDITION 2ND FILING Block 1 Lots 9,10A,10B Block 3 Lot 7 Block 2 Lots 9,10 Block 4 Lots 13A,13B,15,16,17 ,18,19 Block 5 Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ,8,11,12,13 Block 7R Lots 1R,2R NOE ADDITION Block 2 Lots 1C,1D,1E,6A,6B,6C MC CULLOCH, BW SUBDIVISIO_N Lots A-B,C,D NORRIS, FANNIE, LEE SUBDIVISION Lot D MILLER, T E SUBDIVISION_ Lot A n75 ' 177 � y • Z IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the City of Fort Worth has caused this instr ent to ke executed in it half and signed by its Mayor, this- ay of A.D. , 19i CITY OF FORT ORTH BY M or ATTEST: City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed 7ft the fo egoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of the City of Fort Worth, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas, and as the Mayor thereof, and for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the I day of A.D. , 19-fJY Notary Public in and for MAE WCOUTH the State of Texas • ' STATE OF TEXAS 11?j on&M.1W U,am 1t2178 o LLJ � z p +� 3 W O N N r L N H � +� C d' t/f N b LLJ N cn O ~ m O d H LLJ O 0. a) H Z }LL. ) n LL. p L,J LL. N L,J S M: O L,J •• N H =D C tN Z Q O O U) 4-) X Z 3 0 >- L. N p Ll N 0� L,J U H he ^ LLJ O J cn:: L,J U t IV J LL. ia. LL. - S (r O 4-) O ,-� O E LL, S (.) L L B LL- LL. U L,J t O L+J U O Z cn F- 3 L,J U U: L,J m H O H HUHO LI- F- Z 4- U Q U LL. Q # i © co fif � i8 D192165000 CITY SECRETARY OFFICE 1000 THROCKMORTON ST ALICE CHURCH; ROZ FT WORTH, TX 76102 -W A R N I N G-THIS IS PART OF THE OFFICIAL RECORD--D 0 N 0 T D E S T R O Y F I L E D -- T A R R A N T C O U N T Y T E X A S S U Z A N N E H E N D E R S 0 N -- COUNTY CLERK O F F I C I A L R E C E I P T T 0: CITY SECRETARY OFFICE RECEIPT NO REGISTER PRINTED DATE TIME 192285327 DR93 08/27/92 11 : 59 INSTRUMENT FEECD FILED TIME 1 D192165000 ML 920827 11 :59 CA T O T A L DOCUMENTS: 01 F E E S : 8 . 00 B Y: ANY PROVISION WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE RENTAL OR USE OF THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF COLOR OR RACE IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LAW. 1075 2 180