Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 177 AN ORD INANCE. Assessing a portion of the cost of improvement on South Adams Street, in the City of Fort Worth , Texas, between its intersection with the south line of Terrell avenue and its into section with the south line of Cactus street, against the owners of property abutting thereon and their property; and providing for the collection of the said assessment and the assignable certificates evidencing the sane . It T / BE IT ORDAnTn, BY TM BOAM OF COBVISSIONT'2 OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH; TAAT: 7MRRRA S, on the day of wbn,j�,, 19 o, the Board of Commissioners of said City by resolution dirodtoC Via improvement of Arians street between its intersection with the line of and its intersec- tion with the line of Street, by rAis- ing, filling, grading and paving the sarn• and *-o—•eas, in accordance with said resolution, specifications for said work were duly prepared by the said Board; and whereas, bids for said **rovement were duly advertised for as required by the City Charter; and whereas, said bids were received, opendd and considered by the Board of Commissioners, and the b id' of the Metropnlitaa Constr=tion Comp-wy, a c2xP2r-ation, for the im- provement of said street was accepted. by said Board of Com- missione re; and whereas, the said Cop-wany has entered into contracts with the City of Fort Worth, as provided by the Charter, for the improvement of said stroeta within said limits by raising, grading and f illing the safe, aryl by paving sane with lermadez Take or Trinidad Doke Sheet Asphalt pavement upon a rive inch gravel concrete base; and whereas, the said Company has exeucted its bonds to the City of Fort ',:orth for the maintenance of the said improvements and for the construction thereof in accordance with said contracts =L @pecifi cations, wit sureties as required by the said City Charter, which contract and bonds with the sureties t..-roof have boon duly a7 pr -,ved by the said Board of Commissioners, and, whereas, thereafter, the City Engineer of said City filed his written statement with the Board of Commissioners concerning the said improvements, and the cost thereof as provided by Section 8, Chapter %IV, of the Charter of said City, i0hich statement was considered by the w said Board, corrected and approvod, and whereas, thereafter, the said Board did, by resolutio* of date theiday of find and declare the necessity of assessing a portion of the cost of said .improvements 4&ainst the arners of property abutting thereon, and their pro- erty, and did prescribe a hearing to the said owners, their agents and attorneys, and fix a date therefor, an& direct the City Secretary of the said City to issue notice of the said hear- ing by advertisement as provided by the said City Charter and also by posting said notices as therein provided, and whereas, in accordance with the said resolution the said City Secre*ry did issue a notice of the said hearing to the said property owners by publication thereof for the time and in the manner, prescribed by the City Charter in "The Star-Telegram," a daily paper of general circulation in the CV7 of-Fort i'.ortn, f-ar five (5) consecutive days prior to the said hearing, and did also notify the Said owners of the said hearing by posting a cony of the said notice to each of them at the postoffice in the City of Vort Worth, more than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing; and, whereas, the said hearing, in ac- cor&ance with the said resolution and notice, was held by the T� Board of Commissioners, on the day of at__ 2 o'clock, A. 11. at which tire a� .I place no o�m©rs of property krpeared to contest the said assessmert.or the benefits of said improvenent or any other matter or thine connectod wit'- the said improvement or any irregularity with reference thereto, except BE IT, THEREFORE, FURiIM CRDAIITED BY THE SAID BOARD CP CO&?'4iiISSIOY S AS FOLLOWS, TO-"IT: FIRST: Tliat the benefits to each parcel of property of each owner hereinafter nw ed, in the enhanced value of the said property exceed in oach case, the amounts hereinafter assessed against such owners, and their property. And the Board having considered the evidence, and it appearing there- from that the strict application of the front foot rule or plan whereby each c7in er is to be assessed in proportion as the frontage of his property is to the whole frontage improved, would be in particular cases unjust and inequitable, and not in accordance with benefits received, and that the apportion- ment of the cost of said improvements between property owners and the assessments hereinafter made, will effect substantial *quality and justice between property ommers having in viow benefits received by and burdens imposed on such ovmers. SECOND: That there is snd. shall be assessed against each of the aaners of pro erty herein ) elw named and against the several parcels of property of the said avners herein be- low described as their proper pro rata pert of the cost of the names of the said owners and their said property. The names of the said owners and descriptions of the property of each and the total amount in money hereby assessed against each avner and his property being as follows, to-wit: i OF Nano Lot Block Addition Front Cost per Total feet front ft cost Lousuo Nooro 1 & 2 7 Fiold-Wolch 100 3.2348 323.481 E 1.1 Pe tors; 3 7 it " 50 3.2348 161.740 N H Grainger 41 & 5 7 it " 100 3.2348 323.481 Thbtsa,s B ii'hito 6 7 It to 50 3.2066 160.332 Lousuo 1'ooro 7 & 8 7 if to 100 3.2066 320.665 Est. of Jno C Terrell 47 & H 40' of 48 6 Terrell's Sub 140 3.2348 452.875 firs J C Torroll S 60' 48 6 of " 60 3.2348 194.090 L H Sargent 1 & N 25' 2 6 " " 64 3.2066 205.225 Z'.rs L A Luytton 3 & S 19' 2 6 '' " 64 3.2066 205,225 T L Hogle 9 & 10 7 Fiold-'1tolch 100 3.2001 320.016 J J Yoatos 11 7 " " 50 3.2001 160.007 H A Clark 12 7 " If 50 3.2001 160.007 Lillian C Nest 13 7 " to 50 3.2001 160.007 J 4 Brown 14 7 " " 50 3.2001 160.007 E F Tillman 15 & 16 7 to it 100 3.2001 320.016 P Reagan 7-14 inc. 6 Terrell's Sub 3$8 3.2001 1243.776 A C Koch 1 1 LoClollan's Sub 50 3.1416 157.082 N J Lowis 2 1 " " 3.1416 157.082 7 G HOUan 3 1 " " 5 3.1416 157.OB2 C I.: Oliver 4 1 If It SO 3.11-16 157.082 D H Purvis 5 1 " It 50 3.1416 157.082 D 0 Sanders 6 1 of If 60 3.1416 157,082 H H Quigrg 7 & 8 1 " In 100 3.1,l16 314.166 A R Carnes 2 & 4 2 'Ecimulty & Nesbitt's Sub. W0 3.11<16 314,166 I J J Parker 6 & 8 2 is to 100 3.1416 314.166 :7 H Siddoll 10 2 of If 50 3.1416 157.082 P E Teathorford 12 2 " " 50 3.1416 157.082 J F Robinson 14 & 16 2 It " 100 3.1416 '314.166 V N Jordan 1 4 'NoClollan's Sub 50 3.1850 159,248 Lillian C ;boat 2 4 " " 50 3.1850 159,248 1.iatilda H Young 3 4 " " 50 3.1850 159.248 Scott Yancy 4 4 " " 50 3.1850 159.248 Mrs Hulda Sp4ocker 5 4 or " 50 3.1850 159.248 ,,Iiss Izora S Williaris 6 & 1 4 " 100 3.1850 318.499 T H Barfield 8 4 " 50 3.1850 159.248 S E 11orrison 2 4 LcAntllty & Nesbitt's Sub. 50 3.1850 159.248 Sydney L Samuels 4 4 " " 50 3.1850 159.248 Efts Hary Ali4e Tittle 6 4 " " 50 3.1850 159.248 • f s W F Rodgers e 4 McAnu'_ty & Nesbitt's Sub 50 3.1850 159.248 R N Cooper 10 4 If It 50 3.1850 159.248 E V Mason 12-14-16 4 if " 150 3.1850 477.75& N Stephenson N 80' of E 100' 8 26 Ross' Sub. 80 3.18.9 254.798 Octavia A Bennett S 20' of a 100' & N 50' of S 100' of E 100' 2$ it " 70 3.1849 222.949 H A Gausenaitz S 50' of $ 100' of 8 & N 25' of E 100' of 7 29 75 3.1849 238.87 J D Davis S 75' of N 100 of E 100' of7 2S " if 75 3.1849 238.87E 1., 1:1 11odcalf N 50' of S 1Q0' of E 100' of 7 2@ it if 50 3.1849 159.248 'm. Plc Dill S 50' of E 1J ' of lot 7 2� " " 50 3.1849 159.248 Mrs Broiming N 100' of r` 100' cf lot 1 20 " " 1QO 3.1849 318.499 H T Edgar N 751 of S 100' Of To 100' of 1 06 " " 75 3.1849 238.83f9 Y D Brazilo $ 25' of C 1 0' of 1 & N50' of 100' of lot 2 �6 " " 76 3.1849 238.875 DS Ross N100' of S1591 2 06 " " 100 3.1849 318.499 George Cannon S 50' of $ 150' of lot 2 3.18,19 159.248 I 6s Turner 1 Swastika Place 5( 3.2304 161.524 George Bbrry 2 " " 50 3.2304 161.524 J H Oppenhoi;iar 3 if is k 3.2304 161.524 IF H Nugent 4 if5C 2.2304 161.524 B K Gorce 5 if 5v 3.2304 161.524 C T Kinnorsloy 6 " If 5J 3.2504 161.524 Mrs Flora Parker 7 " " 50 3.2304 16�.52 fir' R Kysor 14 " If 50 3.2304 16 .52 X7 B FTolls 13 $ " " 50 3.2304 161.52 A J Sopris 12 2 50 3.2304 101.62 D T Bonar 11 2 " If 50 3.2304 181. 2 J 7 Broad D & 10 2 If it1X 3.2304c 323, 4' E L Hissrich a 2 if " 50 3.2304 161, 2 Roar Dunlap � 3 L l o y d ' s 50 9.8404 142. 2 Z7iN Ewing n 3 of60 2.8404 142. 2 S B 11ayftold 3 " 50 2.6404 142, 2 Dr ttn. Fielder A 2 " 50 2.6404 1429 2 Roscoe L Conrike $ 2 50 2.8204 142, J A Durway 6 2 " 50 2.8204 142.E firs Fannie Taylor 3 3 J B Daniels 50 2.9404 142.02 Lirs Emily A Purdy 1 5 " 50 218404 142.02, dire Florence H Le-wig 4 3 " " " 50 248404 142. J B Daniel R4alty Co. 2 5 J B Daniel' s 50 3.8404- 142.024 waltor L Torrell 5 5 " It 50 2.8166 140.832 R C McKissick 3 & 4 5 " " 100 2.8166 281.665 C A Hickman 6 5 " " 50 2.8166 140.832 J B Daniel 3 50 2.8166 140,832 Joe A Vora 4 4 " " 50 2.8166 140,832 �. 13 Vora 5 4 " " 50 2.8166 140.832 %Irs Fannie Taylor 6 �l " if 50 2.8166 140.832 J E Dondrel 1 3 Bondy' s Sub 50 2.8166 140.832 C A Hickman 2 3 it It 50 2.8166 140.832 R C licKissick .3 3 It is 50 2.6166 140.832 Britain R Pobb tt 3 " it 50 2.8166 140.832 J ' igidr0`zs 5 3 " if 62.5 2.8166 176.040 S Meeks 6 3 It " 62.5 2.8166 176.040 Thouas Finn 11 & 12 4 it " 100' 2.8166 281.665 Goo E Bondics 10 4 " " 50 2.8166 140.832 E L Gray 9 4 " " 50 2.8166 1,10.832 Thoo. Finn 8 e. " " 62.5 2.8166 176.040 H H Peters 7 4 " " 62.5 2.8166 176.040 Oliver i'yatt 16 `i Jas.garris8n 50 2.8188 140.840 C ._ Houston 15 4 It " 50 2.8188 140.940 S W Da.vonpo,� 14 4 " " 50 2.8188 140.940 J Pit- 12 & 13 4 " " 100 2.6186 281,882 D R Johnson 11 4 " " 50 2.6188 140.940 +; £ 110r 10 4 " " 50 2.8188 l�'�0.940 E �� Br.11rid{ o 9 4 " " 50 2.8188 140.940 E D Ingr�7Lu 1 9 " " 50 2.8188 140.940 Go.uoy 2 9 " " 50 2.8188 140.940 Ja:acs 1, Pope 3 B " " 50 2.3188 140,940 r R Sa-,rjor 4 9 " " 50 2.8188 140.940 Lon^ :IcLoan 5 9 " '' 50 2.8188 140.940 Idea B Claypool. 6 9 " '' 50 2.8188 140.940 E D Ingram 7 & 8 9 " " 100 2.6188 281.882 sr• yds. Total for property ovmors 10,877.331 $21,210.747 Total for tho City of Fort North 1,869.181r 3,644.904 GRAND TOTAL 12,746.515 V24,855.651 a A r That the amount set opposite the name of each owner above and his property is hereby assessed against the said property and declared to be their personal liability of the ovmor thereof, and secured by a lien upon the said property superior to all other liens, claims or titles except lawful taxes; that the amounts payable by each owner and assessed against his or her p •operty above shall be payable as follows, to-wit: One-third within thirty days after the completion and acceptance f the work by the City, one-Vilyd in one year and onethird in two years after the date of acceptance there- of by the City . All deferred payments if no default is made in the per7ment of any installment when due shall bear interest at the rate of six per cent per annum. If default be made in the payment of any installment of any certificate When Sue then all unp&id installments shall bear interest from date at the rate of eight per cent per annum and collection charges. Such deferred payments to be evidenced by itrrprovemont cor_ tificateiJ to be issued by the City, payable to the contractor, constituting a personal liability against the res.ective property owners otiose lands are assessed and be secured .by a lien on such property superior to all other liens, claims or titles except lawful taxes , and be issued in the nani ,..or tend fern prescribed by the laws and ordinances of the said City of Fort ";.rth . THIRD: That this w dinance shall take effect from and after its passage. r I �c . . . . . 1k rC.. Board o_ t,omrni C o -Po Worth-. t tr session of said Board held Tuesday July ,nth,l '4 C S ORDINANCE ORDINANCE Terrell 1i ( Lr L s -S f Adopted p Adopted Final Adoption Final Adoption Published Published Filed nay of , 19 Filed Zplie,4 ay of t & IV City Secretary Ci y Secretary