Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinance 14286 BudgetBook Complete
Oouble oak Flower Mound r ke .Trophy Club I - Tl WISE Co. sNa �"i �jQRaPEtllINE -'�- Jrr'�tnieE m �,• r . J; J Coppell t asle� U n _ _ r.J Soul hlake Grapevine I Keller Irving keside: 7 '•r ,h di Cro ey a 'rt Worth Extraterritorial Jurisdictional Boundaries Burleson ut Worlh City Limits Line _ 5• A Worth 1999-2000Annexations — -J Apportionment tine - Indicates limits expansion by the City of Fort Worth per reements with other municipalities IJ Jicates extent of other municipality's ETJ hua '\ rated Area ............... 309.436 Sq. Mi. 'ritodal Jurisdiction.. 344.200 Sq. Mi. id as a general depiction of the Extraterritorial lily of Fart Worth as of August 8, 2000 �7 'niii!001hi— Lilt,' ("111 1- I,o IU _ k - 'x' +VIlf mono CONTINUED GROWTH IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH The artistic cover of the 2000-2001:Annual Budget and Program Objectives document depicts the benefits of City of Fort Worth growth. Overall, the City of Fort Worth has experienced a tremendous amount of growth, and this trend is expected to continue. With growth; comes the necessity of providing quality services to -all citizens, such as public libraries and fire stations. In addition, this growth has had a positive effect on the economy through aniincrease in local commerce. The geographic growth is due to the City's more proactive annexation policy. The Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) is a 344 square -mile belt that extends into Parker, Wise, Johnson, and Denton; Counties. By comparison, the area within the City is 309 square -miles. As a tool for growth°management, annexation is used to establish more sensible jurisdictional boundaries, facilitate economic development, and foster coordinatedland development. Between 1989 and 1999, the population of. Fort Worth increased by nearly 57000 residents, or 13 percent, and the land area increased by more thaw 15 square miles. During FY1999-00, the City annexed 3,816 acres ;and will likely annex 3,840 acres during FY2000-01. Each new area added throughannnexation receives many benefits and City services. One such benefit is the City's public library system. Overall, there are 14 public libraries within the City, which serve an estimated 2.5 million patrons annually. Summerglen Branch Library, the newest addition Iocated in north Fort Worth, will benefit, many. citizens in areas that have recently been annexed. With additional growth.. comes the: responsibility of expanding existing City services..:, Currently, the. City. has 38 fire stations and plans to open two more in the near future. One of Ahe new stations will be. located ;in north .Fort Worth, and the second will be located in southwest Fort Worth. Business development is flourishing. due to the thriving economy in Fort Worth. The .complement of higher education institutions offer companies a large recruiting pool. As a result of the improved economic conditions, the unemployment rate has decreased from 8.4.'percent in 1993 to 4.2 percent in.1999. Correspondingly, Fort Worth's- job. growth rate increased by four percent between 10,98 and 1999, or 71,000 people, as compared to the State rate, which grew by three percent. Fort Worth is home to such key employers as General Motors, Nokia, Albertson's, Coors, Haggar Clothing, J.C. Penney, Nestle's Foods, Zenith, SABRE, Fort Worth Star -Telegram, Harris Methodist Hospital, Intel, Tarrant County, and University of North Texas Heath Science Center. The City of Fort Worth and its Citizens have enjoyed the benefits of the City's considerable growth. Through collaborative efforts and detailed planning, the City will continue to build strong neighborhoods, develop a sound economy, and provide a safe community. IN HONOR OF ,BOB TERRELL Charles Boswell CAREER MIGHLIGHTS BUDGET ANALYST ,1974 1977 Responsible'for budgetary duties in the Police, Fire, Public Works, Traffic Engineering, Public Health, Aviation, Parks and Recreation, Planning Law, and Water Departments. ASSISTANT TOE THE CITY NIANAGER,1979-1985'; Developed the City's first comprehensive energy rnanagernent program, coordinated the City's efforts in implementing the 9= I -I emergency co municationa 4ystem; established the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program and the Economic Development Qffice. PRESENTED To City of Fort Worth, Texas For the Fiscal Year Beginning October 1, 1999 President Executive Director F.e� The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of Distinguished Budget Presentation to the City of Fort Worth for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1999 In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program -requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION City Officials ........................ A-1 City Organizational Chart .... A-7 City Council District Map ..... A-9 CITY MANAGER'S MESSAGE .......................... B-1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICY STATEMENTS,.... C-1 INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION Statement of Vision ............. D-1 Budget Format ..................... D-3 Budget Procedure and Philosophy ........................ D-7 Suggested Schedule ......... D-11 SUMMARY INFORMATION Appropriations and Ad Valorem Ordinances ....................... E-1 Schedule of Changes to Proposed Budget ............ E-19 General Fund Budget Synopsis ............. E-27 Total City Operating Budget Organizational Chart ....... E-41 Total Operating Budget and Total Revenues ....... E-43 General Fund Budget Expenditures and Revenues ........................ E-44 Summary of Authorized Positions and Expenditures General Fund ............... E-45 Other Funds ................. E-46 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL FUND ................ F-1 STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS Housing .............................. G-1 Human Relations Commission ...................... G-11 Planning ............................ G-21 Parks & Community Services ......................... G-27 Zoo................................... G-37 Public Library .................... G-45 SOUNDECONOMY Development .......................H-1 Transportation and Public Works ......... .......... H-11 Public Events.....................H-21 SAFE COMMUNITY City Services ........................1-1 Police .................................. I -11 Fire..................................... 1-27 Municipal Court ....... .......... 1-37 Public Health ...................... 1-47 Environmental Management .................... 1-55 SUPPORT SERVICES Mayor and City Council ....... J-1 City Manager ....................... J-7 Internal Audit ..................... J-15 City Secretary .................... J-21 Law.................................... J-27 Finance .............................. J-35 Human Resources.. ........... J-43 Risk Management .............. J-49 Non -Departmental ............. J-57 DEBT SERVICE .................. K-1 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLANL-I WATER AND SEWER FUND ................... M-1 SOLID WASTE FUND........ N-1 MUNICIPAL GOLF FUND.. 0-1 AIRPORTS FUND ..... .......... P-1 MUNICIPAL PARKING GARAGE ............................ Q-1 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Fund Statement ................. R-1 Equipment Services Fund . R-3 Information Systems Fund R-21 Engineering Fund ............. R-37 Office Services Fund ........ R-53 Temporary Labor Fund..... R-67 SPECIAL FUNDS Insurance Funds.. ................ S-1 Culture and Tourism Fund.S-35 Cable Communications Fund................................ S-51 Lake Worth Trust Fund ...... S-65 Environmental Management Fund................................ S-79 Awarded Assets Funds .............................. S-95 City Store .............. ........... S-101 Grants Fund Summary ....S-103 CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT.... T-1 SALARY SCHEDULE ........ U-1 GLOSSARY ........................V-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Alphabetical Listing by Fund/Department AIRPORTS FUND...............................P-1 AWARDED ASSETS FUNDS ....... ...... S-95 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FUND .......................... ..................... S-61 CITY STORE ......... ............................. S-101 CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT..................T-1 CULTURE AND TOURISM FUND .......S-35 DEBT SERVICE .................................... K-1 ENGINEERING FUND ......................... R-37 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND...............................................S-79 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND ........... R-3 GENERAL FUND...................................F-1 City Manager ..................................... J-7 City Secretary .................................. J-21 City Services ................................ ....... 1-1 Development ..................................... H-1 Environmental Management.............1-55 Fire... ................................................. 1-27 Finance ............................................ J-35 Housing....:........................................ G-1 Human Relations Commission ....... G-11 Human Resources ........................... J-43 Internal Audit .................................... J-15 Law.................................................. J-27 Mayor and City Council ...................... J-1 Municipal Court.................................I-37 Non -Departmental ............................ J-57 Parks & Community Services ......... G-27 Planning .......................................... G-21 Police................................................1-11 Public Events .................................. H-21 Public Health_ ................. ...... ......... 1-47 Public Library .................................. G-45 Risk Management ............................ J-49 Transportation and Public Works.... H-11 Zoo.................................................. G-37 GLOSSARY... ........................................ V-1 GRANT FUNDS SUMMARY ............. S-103 INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND ...... R-21 INSURANCE FUNDS ............................ S-1 LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND ............ S-65 MUNICIPAL GOLF FUND.....................0-1 MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES FUND ........................... Q-1 OFFICE SERVICES FUND ................. R-53 SOLID WASTE FUND ........................... N-1 TEMPORARY LABOR FUND ............. R-67 WATER AND SEWER FUND ................ M-1 City of Fort Worth, Texas City Officials Kenneth L. Barr Mayor Jim Lane Place 2 Chuck Silcox Place 3 Becky Haskin Place 4 Frank Moss Place 5 Mike Groomer Ramon Guajardo Clyde Picht Place 6 Jeff Wentworth Place 7 Ralph McCloud Place 8 Wendy R. Davis Place 9 Bob Terrell City Manager Charles R. Boswell Libby Watson Assistant City Managers Budget Office Staff Bridgette Garrett, Budget Administrator Sary Cheng Greg Jordan Kristin Glass Skip Krueger Brian Hagerty Sandy Oliver Alan Shuror Clinton Spruill A-1 A-2 list of Departments and Directors City Manager's Office information Systems Fund Housing Bob Terrell, Shirley Sanger, Jerome Walker, City Manager Acting Director Director Development Human Relations commission Bob Riley, Vanessa Boling, Director Director Internal Audit City Secretary Costa Triantaphilides, Gloria Pearson, City Internal Auditor City Secretary Finance James Keyes, Director City Services Tom Davis, Director Police Ralph Mendoza, Police Chief Public Health Letha Aycock, Acting Director Aviation Lisa Pyles, Director Transportation & Public works Hugo Malanga, Director Human Resources Linda Cobb, Director Fire H. Larry McMillen, Fire Chief Parks & Community Services Richard Zavala Jr., Director Environmental Management Brian Boerner, Director Library Gleniece Robinson, Director Planning Fernando Costa, Director Municipal Court Elsa Paniagua, Director Ninfa Mares, Chief Judge LOW David Yett, City Attorney Risk Management Susan Bulla, Director Public Events & Facilities Kirk Slaughter, Director zoo Ardon Moore, President Water & Sewer Fund Dale Fisseler, Director Engineering Douglas Rademaker, Director ... „ ,............ �3 City Of Fort Worth 000 Awards City Manager's Office Government Finance Officers Association - Distinguished Budget Presentation Award Texas Eagle Award to the Fort Worth Women's Business Center from the Fort Worth Metropolitan Black Chamber of Commerce City Services r Honorable recognition from U.S. Department of Energy for leadership in improving air quality, strengthening the local economy and enhancing public awareness of alternative fuels through its commitment to and participation in the Clean Cities Program Environmental Management Program Excellence Award from the North American Hazardous Materials Management Association for the outstanding program at the Environmental Collection Center that addresses household hazardous waste management at the state or local level `r Best New Program Award from the North American Hazardous Materials Management Association for the outstanding household hazardous waste collection program at the Mobile Collection Unit Picturesque Award from the North American Hazardous Materials Management Association for the most unique or creative situation at a collection facility Clean Air 2000 Existing Company for the Year Award from the Fort Worth Transportation Authority for implementing outstanding transportation demand management programs Honorable mention from the Communicator Awards 1999 Video Competition r Honorable recognition from National Association of Local Government Environmental Professionals for serving as national model of clean air innovation Finance Government Finance Officers Association — Certificate of Excellence of Achievement in Financial Reporting A-,= __ __,.._._......,,,..,_._................. Fire * Congressional Fire Services Institute Award for support services Extraordinary Response Award from United Way of Tarrant County for Tornado Response * Protecting People First Foundation Award Public Health * Agency of the Year Award from the Texas Animal Control Association r Five Star Vital Registration Award from the Texas Department of Public Health for recognizing the timeliness of record turnaround, a low rejection rate and a high level of training Human Resources 's Martha Arbuckle Award from the Governor's Committee for Persons with Disabilities for the most innovative program of a Mayor's Committee. Information Technology Solutions r Savvy Competition Award from the City/County Communication and Marketing Association (3CMA) for technology services - intranet Library * International Arts Award from the International World Affairs Council of Greater Fort Worth for the International Film Festival * Honorable recognition from the Smithsonian's National Museum of History Key Resource on the Web Award from Links2Go for having over 9 million hits on the City of Fort Worth library's homepage Municipal Court Honorable recognition from the National League of Cities' Nation's Weekly for continuous improvement turnaround Parks and Community Services Millennium Arbor Day Award for honoring Fort Worth as the oldest Tree City USA in the State, 26 years; only one city in each state received this honor National Recreation and Park Association Chalk It Up! Award for best program and visibility in celebrating youth and community r`r Savvy 2000 Award of Excellence — From the City -County Communications and Marketing Association for the most creative activities with the least dollars spent: Fort Worth Herd Texas Recreation and Park Society Lone Star Programming Award for the Fort Worth Herd as an innovation in programming Texas Recreation and Park Society Commercial Volunteer Award for the improvements to the Hillside Park Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs' Community Services Block Grant Performance Award for assisting individuals to transition out of poverty and for maintaining an effective case management system Fort Worth Advertising Club Dateline Award for generating positive publicity for Tarrant County through the Fort Worth Herd DFW Metroplex Directors Innovation 2000 Award to the Log Cabin Village "Wagons West" Program DFW Metroplex Directors Innovation Programming Award to the Sculpture Symposium Star -Telegram Best of Tarrant Award to the Botanic Garden as the best wedding location in Tarrant County * Star -Telegram Best of Tarrant Award to Trinity Park as the best place to jog, bike and hike in Tarrant County * Star -Telegram Best of Tarrant Award to the Fort Worth Zoo as the best place in Tarrant County for family outings * REACH, Inc. Award to Botanic Garden complex and staff for excellence in complying with ADA requirements and providing unique and versatile facilities for the community Planning * Certificate of Achievement for Planning Excellence from the Texas American Planning Association * Outstanding Planning Process Award from the Midwest Section of the Texas Chapter, American Planning Association for Lancaster Corridor Redevelopment Project Ai - Police �s Most Cases Cleared Award from the Crime Stoppers International for Tarrant County Crime Stoppers program, to which Fort Worth Police Department contributes the largest number of cases in the program Most Arrests Award from the Crime Stoppers International for Tarrant County Crime Stoppers program, to which Fort Worth Police Department contributes the largest number of arrests in the program Most Improved Crime Stoppers Program, Worldwide Award from the Crime Stoppers International Water `r Environmental Protection Agency National Award for Beneficial Use of Biosolids Operating Project 's Excellence in Environmental Engineering Award from the American Academy of Environmental Engineers Gold Award from the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies for perfect permit compliance National Honorable Mention Award from the US Environmental Protection Agency for outstanding project involving and enhancing beneficial use of municipal wastewater biosolids Grand Award from American Consulting Engineers Council for engineering excellence r Wastewater Treatment "Plant of the Year" Award from Water Environment Association of Texas for Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant * Engineering Excellence Award from Consulting Engineers Council of Texas * National Pretreatment Award from US Environmental Protection Agency CITIZENS OF FORT" WORTH MAYOR AND COUNCIL ° CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION 1 s761s07 4.6A.P. DISTRICT BOARD • D/FW AIRPORT BOARD ADVISORY • FORT WORTH HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARDS • FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY • RETIREMENT BOARD / CITY CITY MANAGER (CITY ATTORNEY INTERNAL SECRETARY — AUDIT $495,089 eA A.P. 53.251,726 40.0 A.P. S668,616 15.0 A.P. CABLE AM $975,97 ^M3.6 As. CITY MA AGER'S OFFICE AND CULTURE SERVICE STORE �:,.._ NONENTAL OFFICE SERVICES RE DEP_AR7_M, _ - -_- wit* TOURISM �� $7,919,566 4.0 A.P. $46.930.973 0.0 A.P. 54,601,578 55.8 A.P., 5112,2f0 2.0 A.P. $72,569,277 3.0 A.P. $2,027,620 19.0 A.P. Strong Neighborhoods Sound Economy Safe Community Support Services HOUSING AVIATION CITY SERVICES FINANCE $57,799 0,40 A.P. $3,084,972 30.0 A.P. $5.337,093 68.0 A.P. $4,980,001 # 80.0 A.P. HUMAN RELATIONS DEVELOPMENT EQUIPMENT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION $12,302,479DIVISION s4e.aA.P. ..• i I' SOLID WASTE — $306,020 4.0 A.P. $5,088,642 rt79A A.P. $2,948,431 35.0 A.P. $23,227,496 78.0 A.P. I LIBRARY ENGINEERING TEMPORARY LABOR 4 ENVIRONMENTAL $994,939 2.0 A.P.+ .. ,w. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS $12,357,170 200.50A.P. $9261400 156.75 A.P. - $1,335,172 20.0 A.PAw, PARKS AND LAKE W0 11TH TRUST ENVIRONMENTAL ... $776,416 O.O A.P. 512,504,653 111.0 A.P. COMMUNITY MANAGEMENTFUND SERVICES $2,960,596 20.0 A.P. $18,521,318 j_2.6,4 A.P. PUBLIC EVENTS FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT I AND GOLF FACILITIESAMR .. $5,767,929 53.0A.P.1 $8,355,487 15 A 115.0 A.P. $1,035,307 13.OA.P. 358,568,555 782.OA.P. I PLANNING TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE FUNDS AND PUBLIC MUNICIPAL COURT Group Health WORKS Proper$28,46/Ca _Jhl • roperty.953 fty $1,372,586 20.oA.P. $30,684,776 399.OA.P. $5,066,844 1 s6,683,713—� 160.o A.P. • Unemployment Comp ZOO MUNICIPAL PARKING $350,000 FACILITIES POLICE • Workers' Comp $25e,2s6 1.0n.P. $10,104,930 $2.838.609 62.0 A.P. WATER $92.807,206 1385.0 A.P. ... AND SEWER AWARDED ASSETS $202,662,581 753.0 A.P. $684,973 0.0 A.P. CRIME DISTRICT $37,210,029 184.oA.P. APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEALTH O ELECTED OFFICIAL DEPARTMENTS SPECIALIZED S6,129,931 qr 121.0A.P. ® FUNCTIONS City of Fort Worth Single Member Districts A-11 PROFILE OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH LOCATION AND HISTORY Fort Worth, seat of Tarrant County, Texas is located in Tarrant and Denton Counties in North Central Texas at 970 55' west longitude and 32' 36' north latitude. Situated on the Trinity River, Fort Worth is approximately 75 miles south of the Oklahoma state line and 270 miles north of the Gulf of Mexico. Fort Worth was established as a frontier army post in 1849 by Major Ripley Arnold and named for General William Jenkins Worth, who distinguished himself in the War with Mexico. The outpost became a stopping place on the famous Old Chisholm Trail and a shipping point for the great herds of Longhorn cattle being driven to northern markets. Progressive city leadership brought the first of nine railroads to Fort Worth in 1876 and with the subsequent West Texas oil boom, guided the city into a metropolitan county of more than a million people. Fort Worth was a blending of cattle, oil, finance and manufacturing, and since World War II has become an aerospace, education, transportation and industrial center in the Southwest. GOVERNMENT Fort Worth operates under the Council -Manager form of municipal government. A Mayor chosen at -large by popular vote and an eight -member, single -district council is elected to two-year terms. In turn, the Mayor and City Council appoint the City Manager who is the chief administrative and executive officer. The City Council is also responsible for the appointment of the City Attorney, Municipal Judges, City Secretary and the City Auditor. AREA AND POPULATION The Fort Worth metropolitan area continues to be ranked as one of the fastest growing areas of the top 50 metropolitan areas as reported by the Sales and Marketing Management, Metro Market Projections. As of January 1, 1985, the Dallas -Fort Worth Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) was split into two separate areas: the Fort WorthArlington Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA) and the Dallas PMSA. The Fort Worth -Arlington PMSA now includes Johnson, Parker and Tarrant Counties. The Dallas -Fort Worth SMSA previously included the following counties in addition to those now in the Fort Worth -Arlington PMSA: Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Hood, Kaufman, Rockwall and Wise. Fort Worth's population in 198D was 385,164. Tarrant County's population in 1980 was 861,837, representing a 20% increase since 1970. The 1990 Census population for Tarrant County was 1,170,103, representing a 36% increase since 1980. The 2000 estimated City population is 516,150 and the estimated County population is 1,410,740. TRANSPORTATION Thirty-seven scheduled carriers provide 2,279 aircraft operations perday at the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport, located just twenty-four minutes driving time from downtown Fort Worh. The airport operates seven runways, covers nearly 30 square miles, and handles more than 60 million inbound and outbound passengers each year. This major international airport is governed jointly by the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth, and is now consdered the third busiest airport in the world. Meacham International Airport, a Fort Worth municipally owned and operated general aviation airport, logs more than 420,000 take -offs and landings annually at its all-weather facilities. Meacham was named the top air traffic control facility in the nation by the Federal Aviation A-12 Administration in 1999, a distinction that was earned by completing more than two million operations without an error. Fort Worth Spinks Airport, a general aviation airport located inthe southwestern portion of the City, is equipped with a 6,000•foot runway and two taxiways. Three interstate highways (Interstate 20, Interstate 30 and Interstate 35), five federaland four state highways provide all-weather routes within Fort Worth and to and from the rest of the nation. Interstate 820, which encircles the city, allows quick access to all parts of the Fort Worth area. The Texas Highway Commission has completed a master highway construction plan for Tarrant County to provide for transportation needs through the foreseeable future, including the southward relocation of a segment of Interstate 30 that extends from just east of downtown to several miles west. This project is underway and will promote redevelopment of the south end of the @ntral Business District and the Hospital District southwest of downtown. Fort Worth is served by six major railroad systems, one of which, Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad, has its corporate headquarters in Fort Worth. Rail passenger service is presided through Fort Worth, including AMTRAK service between Houston and Chicago. Fort Worth's position as a major southwest distribution center is supported by the presence of 75 regular route motor carriers with more than 750 schedules. Local transit service is provided by the Fort Worth Transportation Authority (The T). Greyhound Trailways Bus Lines furnish Fort Worth with transcontinental passenger service; intrastate bus service is provided by Transportation Enterprises and Texas Bus Lines. The Trinity. Railway Express opened in the summer of 2000, providing commuter rail transportation between several major cities in the metropolitan area. The new train route is scheduled to connect Dallas and Fort Worth in 2001. EDUCATION The Fort Worth Independent School District serves the major portion of Fort Worth. The 120 schools in the district operate on the 5-3-4 plan in which the elementary schools teach grades 1-5; middle schools, grades 6-8; and senior highs schools, grades 9-12. The Fort Worth Independent School District employs 4,596 classroom teachers to instruct more than 78,600 students. Special education programs are provided for the blind, handicapped, mentally retarded, brairrinjured, emotionally disturbed and those who require speech and hearing therapy in ten special schools. Vocational training is provided at the secondary level for the educable mentally retarded. Bilingual programs are also offered at the primary and secondary level. There are 52 private and parochial institutions in the primary and secondary education area' with a combined enrollment of approximately 7,300 students. Some other independent school districts that serve Tarrant County include Birdville, Castleberry, Crowley, Eagle Mountain -Saginaw, Everman, White Settlement, Keller, and Lake Worth. Tarrant County has eight college and university campuses with an enrollment of more than 63,000 students in both undergraduate and graduate programs. Included in these colleges and universities are: Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary; Tarrant County College, South, Northeast, Southeast, and Northwest Campuses; Texas Christian University; Texas Wesleyan University; the University of Texas at Arlington; and the University of North Texas Health Science Center. There are twenty-nine other colleges and universities within a fifty -mile radius with an enrollment of more than 119,000, HEALTH SERVICES Medical facilities in Tarrant County offer excellent and convenient care. There are 18 hospitals with approximately 4,000 beds and 300 bassinets; one children's hospital with 208 beds; four government hospitals; 51 private convalescent homes; the Fort Worth Public Health Center; A-13 Cancer Clinic; Carter Blood Care and the University of North Texas Health Science Center. Four hospitals located inside the city limits offer facilities for residents, student nurses and licensed vocational nurse training. Tarrant County Medical Society offers a doctors' referral service at no charge. MILITARY Carswell Air Force Base closed as an active air force facility in September 1994. In October 1994, the Navy assumed host command functions. The base was renamed Naval Air Station, Joint Reserve Base, Fort Worth, Carswell Field. Now that all of the units have been transferred here from NAS Dallas, Glenview NAS, Detroit, and Memphis, there are 4,000 fulttime jobs and 7,500 reservists utilizing the facilities. Approximately $130 million of construction, remodeling and renovation was invested over the transition period. There are 109various aircraft flying out of NAS Fort Worth. The Base Exchange (BX) Mart continues to operate a base exchange store and grocery store for the benefit of active duty military personnel and nearly 100,000 retired military and family members in the metroplex. The golf course is now under lease to the Carswell Redevelopment Authority and is operated as a public use facility. The Justice Department has established a Federal Medical Center in the area around the old base hospital. The facility is for female Federal inmates and employs 300 personnel. THE ECONOMY The Fort Worth economy is becoming increasingly more diversified. Once heavily dependent upon contracts from the U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Worth is building a strong reputation as the leading city for national and international product distribution facilities. Furthermore, hightech manufacturing is growing as various corporations take advantage of opportunities provided by Fart Worth's skilled labor force. Three factors make Fort Worth an attractive city for distribution and logistics. First, it is an excellent geographic location at the center of North America. Second, the city has an abundant supply of air, rail and ground transportation. Finally, being located in the central time zone allows business representatives to save time traveling to and from both U.S. coasts. Companies such as Nestle's Foods, Patterson Dental, Valmont Electric, Roadway Packaging, Dillard's, Albertson's, Winn Dixie, Williamson-Dickie, General. Motors, Riddell, Coors and Coca Cola operate distribution facilities in Fort Worth. Since 1993, Nokia, Zenith, and Haggar Clothing have constructed and are now operating distribution centers in the city. In 1997, Federal Express completed construction of a new package -sorting hub at Fort Worth's Alliance Airport, adding 850 jobs to the local economy. Additionally, J.C. Penney Corporation has built a 400,000 square foot distribution center, representing a $140 million investment that will employs 400 people. The availability of a skilled labor force has made Fort Worth an attractive city for manufacturers of high-tech products. AST Computers has consolidated its desktop computer manufacturing and computer repair service in Fort Worth. In April 1995, Motorola began operations in a 300,000 square foot manufacturing facility for its new Global Paging Infrastructure Division (GPID). This division joins the company's expanding cellular operations on Motorola's 100-acre campus. Nokia, manufacturer of cellular phones, operates a $57 million manufacturing facility, which employs more than 1,800 people. Numerous public and private entities have joined forces to address those issues that challenge Fort Worth's economic future. Corporations such as Lockheed Martin, Burlington Northern/Santa Fe, and Union Pacific Resources have provided financial assistance and professional expertise in developing new services aimed at assisting small businesses. A-14 As the geographic mid -point between Canada and Mexico, Fort Worth is taking steps to maximize opportunities available through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Each year, Fort Worth hosts its "Aeronafta" conference at which business representatives from Canada and Mexico meet with local business leaders to discuss the benefits of air transportation available in Fort Worth. Other trade missions and informational exchanges are forging new partnerships between Fort Worth and our NAFTA partners. A partnership consisting of Sundance Square and the Tandy Corporation is constructing new housing, entertainment, and retail shopping facilities in Fort Worth's downtown. The City has joined this partnership by creating a downtown Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district to provide infrastructure to support the private investment in this development. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Alliance Industrial Park Alliance is a joint effort of Hillwood Development, the City of Fort Worth, neighboring communities, the Federal Aviation Administration and other government and civic leaders in the development and operation of an industrial airport, business community, and international trade center. Alliance is located in the northwest corner of the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex, within the northern limits of the City of Fort Worth. Alliance's access to highway, rail and air trarsportation offers an excellent opportunity for future commercial and industrial growth. There are five business parks within Alliance. Alliance Center At the heart of Alliance Center is the 414-acre Alliance Airport. This City -owned airport is managed by Pinnacle Air Services (a Perot company) and boasts a 9,600-foot runway (with plans to expand to 13,000 feet), two parallel taxiways and a state-of--the-art air traffic control tower. Alliance Airport is the only purely industrial airport in the world and one of few North Texas airports capable of accommodating heavy transport aircraft such as the DG10 and 747. Fort Worth -based American Airlines is the anchor of Alliance Airport with a $300 million, 1,800 employee aircraft maintenance center. Also, Federal Express operates a $218 million package - sorting hub that will serve a growing southern U.S. market. The FAA employs 55 people to direct flight operations from a 45,000 square foot facility. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency operates a 140,000 square foot National Airwing Headquarters with 155 employees on the airport grounds. Since the City owns this facility, it is not subject to ad valorem taxation. Alliance Gatewav Alliance Gateway, with more than 2.8 million square feet of distribution and manufacturing space, is home to major corporations, including: Nestle Distribution Company (food and candy distribution facility); Nokia Mobile Phones (cellular phone manufacturing and distribution); Southwestern Bell Telephone (customer call center); and Zenith Electronics (consumer electronics distribution facility). The .lames River Paper Company built a 375,000 square foot facility for its regional distribution center. In 1999, Ameritrade began operations of a national customer care center at Alliance Gateway. Alliance Tech Center Corporations operating regional and national distribution facilities at Alliance Tech Center include CompuCom Systems, GWS Perlos, Patterson Dental Company, Riddell Athletic Footwear, and Valmont Electric. These companies occupy approximately 300,000 square feet and employ more A-15 than 240 persons. A new garden office complex of 300,000 square feet called Heritage Commons is complete and houses Hillwood Development's operations. Westport at Alliance Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad's (BNSF) $100 million, 300-acre intermodal facility is the largest resident in Westport. BNSF employs 270 persons at this facility. A new 400,000 square foot warehouse houses J.C. Penney's distribution center. This center employs 400 persons, making the center the largest employer at Westport. Alliance Crossinq More than 2,800 persons work at Alliance Crossing, in more than 5.1 million square feet of commercial/industrial facilities. Other developments within the Alliance Complex include: i) A 60,000 square foot fixed base facility at the airport. 2) A distribution center of 170,000 square feet for Bearings, Inc. 3) 60,000 square feet leased by B F Goodrich Aerospace for gas turbine engine manufacturing. 4) A 75,000 square foot finish -out facility for corporate aircraft manufacturer Galaxy Aerospace. SCSIFrigette SCS, a Fort Worth automobile air conditioner manufacturing company, will make as many as 100,000 air conditioners for the Russian car manufacturer Lada. Lada has the largest auto assembly plant in the world at the city of Togliatti, located on the Volga River. Dannon Yoqurt Comoanv Dannon plans to invest $10 million in its second factory expansion in four years. One of only three yogurt production sites in the U.S., Dannon's Fort Worth plant will ircrease yogurt production by 75 percent. Fort Worth is also one of five Dannon distribution centers in the U.S. Bell Helicopter Bell Helicopter added 500 jobs in 1993 and approximately 1,000 jobs in 1994 due to increased international sales. More than 1,000 workers laid off in 1992 have been recalled, and there have been more than 300 new hires. In addition, Bell has secured a Navy contract worth $126 million for the production of 20 Super Cobra attack helicopters. Engineering and composite operations associated with the manufacture of the V-22 tilt -rotor vehicle are currently performed in Fort Worth. Mercantile Center Business Park Mercantile is currently home to the Federal Aviation Administration's $20 million Southwest Regional Headquarters, Dillard's Department Store's 100,000 square foot distribution center, a 60,000 square foot distribution center for Virbac, a French pharmaceutical company, and Campfire, U.S.A.'s state-of-the-art Childcare Center and National Training Center for childcare providers. Sprint Spectrum, a division of Sprint Communications, involved in Personal Communication Services (PCS), has occupied a 150,000 square foot facility to be used as a telephone customer service center. The Center employs 600 people. Burlington Northern Railroad Burlington Northern has completed construction of its $100 million Network Operations Center (NOC) on the company's Western Center Boulevard property in north Fort Worth. The NOC, comprised of two buildings totaling more than 250,000 square fert, is a high-tech, state-of-the-art facility which will serve as the control and tracking center for all of Burlington's railroads through the U.S. Haggar Apparel Companv Haggar Corporation, a leading marketer of men's apparel, operates a $30 million Cusbmer Service Center. The 660,000 square foot facility incorporates the latest in material handling technology. Haggar employs more than 400 persons at the site. Texas Motor SDeedwav Located in far north Fort Worth at the intersection of Interstate 35W and State Highway 114, the $110 million Texas Motor Speedway was completed in the spring of 1997. The facility includes a 1.5-mile racing oval, grandstand seating for 150,000 spectators and approximately 200 luxury suites. An office tower and condominiums have also been constructed on the property. Future plans include an additional 90,000 seats and an industrial park. Pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the speedway developer and the Fort Worth Sports Authority, Texas Motor Speedway is owned by the Authority and is therefore exempt from ad valorem taxes. NASCAR Winston Cup races and sanctioned IRL Indy Car races have been held at the Texas Motor Speedway. The facility has also several major music concerts and other large events since opening. MISCELLANEOUS Water, sewer and solid waste services are furnished by the City of Fort Worth. Texas Utilities (TXU) provides electricity and natural gas service to Fort Worth. Basic (local) telephone service is provided by either Southwestern Bell Telephone or Verizon (formerly GTE), while long distance service is provided by numerous carriers. The central building of the Fort Worth Public Library is the nation's largest underground public library at 125,000 square feet. The library offers more than ore million titles of books and micro -materials in twelve branches, two regional facilities, and two stations in public housing communities. More than 400 churches with 45 denominations and synagogues in Fort Worth contribute vitally to the lives of City residents. The City is also world-famous for its many museums. The Fort Worth Convention Center offers more than 182,000 square feet of exhibit and meeting space, including a 14,000-seat arena. Construction of the Nancy Lee and Perry R. Bass Performance Hall was completed in the spring of 1998. This state-of-the-art $70,000,000 performing arts hall was funded entirely from private donations. CITY OF FORT WORTH BUILDING PERMITS Fiscal Number of Buildinq Permits by Tvoe Dollar Value of Buildino_ Permits Year Commercial Total Commercial Total Ended New And New New and New 9-30 Residential Miscellaneous Construction Residential Miscellaneous Construction 1994 1,422 145 1,567 161,108,000 178,323,000 339,431,000 1995 2,380 653 3,033 238,722,000 154,767,000 393,489,000 1996 1,800 1,600 3,200 234,301,000 290,165,000 524,466,000 1997 1,900 1,800 3,700 303,925,000 388,631,000 692,556,000 1998 3,300 1,200 4,600 401,693,000 469,331,000 871,024,000 1999 3,892 1,500 5,392 320,631,905 484,299,313 804.931,218 2000 4,410 1,608 6,018 404,151,296 433.785,184 837,936,480 Source: Development Department, City of Fort Worth. LABOR FORCE ESTIMATES Average Average Average Average Average Average Area Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 Fort Worth -Arlington PMSA Employed 896,183 850,545 815,915 806,211 781,854 760,352 Unemployed 31,150 28,887 30,966 33,018 39,953 49,724 % of Unemployment 3.4% 3.3% 3.7% 3.9% 4.9% 5.6% Tarrant County Employed 776,357 738,255 709,798 698,011 679,411 665,138 Unemployed 26,886 24,956 26,754 28,337 34,890 39,053 % of Unemployment 3.3% 3.3% 3.6% 3.9% 4.9% 5.5% City of Fort Worth` Employed 260,000 255,106 237,916 242,864 235,527 229,693 Unemployed 11,000 11,557 13,577 13,173 16,157 17,998 % of Unemployment 4.2% 4.3% 5.4% 5.1 % 6.4% 7.3% Source: Texas Workforce Commission, Labor Market Information Department * 1999 Fort Worth estimate based on proportion of PMSA and recent trends. SELECTED FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA MAJOR EMPLOYERS Number of local Employer employees in 1999 American Airlines 1 AMR Corp. 35,000 Lockheed Martin 11,400 Fort Worth ISD 9,100 Bell Helicopter Textron 7,800 Teleservice Resources 6,000 US Post Office 6,000 City of Fort Worth 5,475 Delta Airlines 5,000 Tarrant County 4,000 Burlington Northern Santa Fe 3,100 Alcon Laboratories 2,500 JPS Health Network 2,323 Tandy 1 Radio Shack 2,300 Fort Worth Star -Telegram 2,000 Nokia 2,000 Source: Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce and North Central Texas Council of Governments. CITY OF FORT WORTH EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND ANNEXATION POLICY Under the provisions of State law, incorporated cities in Texas have the power to exercise certain controls in unincorporated areas adjacent to their city limits. For a city the size of Fort Worth, these adjacent areas extend a distance of five (5) miles from its city limits. This adjacent, unincorporated area within five miles is known as the extraterritorial jurisdictional area (ETJ). Significant highlights are: 1. No new city may be incorporated within Fort Worth's ETJ without Fort Worth's consent. 2. No existing city may expand its limits within the ETJ without Fort Worths consent. 3. No land may be subdivided within the ETJ without Fort Worth's approval. 4. All development within Fort Worth's ETJ must be constructed to the same standards required for development within the city limits. 5. No Municipal Utility District may be created within the ETJ without Fort Worth's consent. 6. Fort Worth's ETJ expands with the expansion of its city limits so that the strip always covers the area five (5) miles beyond the city limits. 7. Cities may apportion their extraterritorial jurisdictional area to establish definite control limits and preserve their respective growth area. Fort Worth has secured its ETJ by consummating boundary line agreements with its neighboring cities. Fort Worth's ETJ covers approximately 350 square miles of fully potential expansion area. 8. Fort Worth has the power to annex, either voluntarily or involuntarily, any land in its ETJ. It is the policy of the City of Fort Worth to annex those areas which: a. Are ready for development, b. Have a favorable impact on the City's revenue structure, and c. Will strengthen Fort Worth's role as the central city. PERSONAL INCOME AND BUYING POWER HOUSEHOLD EARNINGS 1998 1998 Total Effective Median Enti Buvinp Income Household Fort Worth $8,690,063,000 $35,940 Tarrant County 28,138,316,000 43,545 Fort Worth Tarrant Countv $20,000 - $34,999 22.1% 19.9% $35,000 - $49,999 17.2% 17.5% $50,000 and over 34.1 % 43,0% Source: Sales and Marketing Management Survey of Buying Power, September, 2000. THE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT SYSTEM Fort Worth has a long-standing commitment to aviation. From the landing of the first airplane in Fort Worth in 1915 to today, Fort Worth has understood and served the needs of the aviation industry. The City serves as home to Lockheed, American Airlines, Bell Helicopter -Textron, Carswell Field and hundreds of aviatiorrrelated businesses. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (owned jointly by the two cities and operated by the Dallas/Fort Worth International Aiport Board) stands as a symbol of the excellence to aviation facilities to which the City is committed. A-19 The City is dedicated to maintaining all facets of aviation-- general, commercial and military -- to the same high standard. An integral part of this dedication is exhibited by the City of Fort Worth's Airport System, which consists of three municipal airfields. These airports and their individual characteristics are as follows: Fort Worth Meacham International Airport Operated since 1925 -- 7,500-foot runway, 4,050-foot crosswind runway, 4,000-foot parallel runway -- FAA flight control tower, with Instrument Landing System (ILS) -- 24-hour aviation fuel service -- major/minor maintenance -- hangar rental space for large and small aircraft -- restaurants and hotel -- located in North Fort Worth Spinks Airport Opened in summer of 1988 -- 6,000-foot runway -- serving general and corporate aviation -- flight training -- site for hangars available -- located in Interstate 35 South Industrial Corridor Alliance Airport Opened in winter of 1989 W- 9,600-foot runway, with ILS -- serving general and industrial/manufacturing cargo aviation -- nine square miles of airport property available for development -- near developing high-tech industrial center -- located in Interstate 35 North Corridor, with rail access A-21 RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER ENTITIES In the course of its responsibilities for municipal governance, the City of Fort Worth interacts with several public and quasi -public entities in various financial and non -financial relationships. Although not directly part of the City's operations, these entities represent a significant environmental factor and the relationships are described to facilitate the reader's understanding of the City's operational framework. MISCELLANEOUS ENTITIES Emplovees' Pension Fund The Employees' Pension Fund of the City is a single -employer defined benefit plan established under legal authority of the City Charter and is included in the combined Financial Statements. The plan uses the entry -age -normal cost method with funding of past service cost as a percentage of payroll. Membership is a condition of employment for full-time, permanent employees except elected officers; non -salaried appointive members of administrative boards and commissions; part-time, temporary, and contract employees paid partly by county, state or other governmental agency; Board of Education employees; and members of local, municipal or state funds. Members contribute 8.25% of their earnings; the City contributes 10.74% thereof from budgeted operating funds. The only exception is for sworn police officers whereby they contribute 8.73% and the City contributes 11.46%. The Board of Trustees of the Fund is composed of 10 members elected by current, active City employees, one retired member elected by the retired members of the fund, and four other members appointed by the City Council. Board members set all policies regarding the investment of the Fund's monies and distribution of benefits to eligible retirees. Tarrant Appraisal District The legislature of the State of Texas has established one agency within each county to be responsible for appraising property values within the county. The Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) provides this service to the taxing entities within Tarrant County. TAD is also responsible for maintaining accurate records on ownership, applicable taxing entities, and their exemptions. Any changes to the City of Fort Worth tax roll are forwarded monthly to the City to update City files. The TAD Board governs the Tarrant Appraisal District. The City of Fort Worth recommends people for consideration as Board members. All member jurisdictions have voting rights in establishing the TAD Board. On approximately July 25 of each year, TAD provides a final roll of taxable property within the taxing jurisdiction of the City of Fort Worth, as of the prior January 1. Based on this information, the City Council sets the tax rate for the fiscal year beginning October 1. Within its statutory authority, the City Council can establish ad valorem tax exemption policies. A-22 Environmental Protection Agency In compliance with the Clean Water Act, in 1996, the City of Fort Worth adopted the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, also known as the stormwater permit, that authorizes the City of Fort Worth, among other entities, to discharge from its municipal separate storm sewer system into the waters of the United States. Currently the City is working with other municipalities in the area to implement its stormwater management program in compliance with the NPDES permit requirements. Through the authorization of the Texas Health and Safety Code, a monthly environmental assessment fee is being charged to all of the City of Fort Worth water customers to assist in defraying costs associated with the stormwater runoff program as well as other federally mandated programs related to environmental cleanup issues. The structure is as follows: $.50 residential, $1.00 duplex residential, $10.00 commercial, $20.00 commercial multi -unit, $35.00 industrial, $.75 non-profit, and $.75 municipal. GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES WITH TAXING AUTHORITY Fort Worth Transportation Authority The Fort Worth Transportation Authority (FWTA) was created pursuant to Article 1118Y of the Vernon's Annotated Civil Statues. State law provides that the control and operation of the regional transportation authority and its property shall be vested in a board comprised of nine members. Eight board members are appointed by the City Council and one by the County Commissioners Court. Its purpose is to oversee public transportation services in the FWTA service area (which is presently concurrent with the Fort Worth city boundaries). In November 1983, the voters in the FWTA service area approved a one -quarter percent sales tax, collection effective April 1984, to fund the Authority with the provision that the rate could rise to one-half percent on January 1, 1989. The increase did go into effect at that time. FWTA has contracted with the City of Fort Worth to provide transportation services in accordance with the Board's adopted service plan. FWTA is not reflected in the City's financial statements because there is not sufficient manifestation of oversight. While the City Council can appoint and may remove Board members, the City does not have ultimate budgetary authority, nor does the City finance operations of FWTA. Any deficits incurred are not the responsibility of the City of Fort Worth. Tarrant Countv Many departments, such as Planning, Public Health, Police and Municipal Court, work closely with and coordinate projects with Tarrant County offices. The City of Fort Worth and Tarrant County have executed a series of contracts to provide public health services, recreational facilities usage, jail service, magisterial duties, fair housing services, tax collection, and emergency management services to one another according to the statutory or fiscal ability of each agency. A-23 Tarrant Countv Hospital District Authorized and created by a State Constitutional Amendment and approved by residents referendum in 1959, the Tarrant County Hospital District consists of two hospitals and a network of outpatient clinics, providing services for Tarrant County including indigent health care. The Tarrant County Commissioners Court appoints a Board of Managers who is responsible for appointing an administrator (CEO), making day-to-day recommendations and funding the hospital district. The administrator develops the operating and capital budgets for approval by the Commissioners Court. The Commissioners Court cannot change the budget proposal but can set and approve the ad valorem tax rate that supports the district's Psychiatric Care. During 1997-98, the City concluded negotiations to cease operating City outpatient clinics, with the Hospital District assuming this function. The City therein transferred ail associated grants to the Hospital District and agreed to provide a General Fund subsidy to support this operation until October 1, 1999. Tarrant Countv College District The Human Resource Department works with Tarrant County College District to broaden City employees' opportunities for career development and job enrichment. The Human Resource Department also coordinates the City's Tuition Reimbursement Program, under which many employees attend TCC or other accredited colleges/universities for credit courses under degree plans relevant to City careers. Tuition reimbursement is also applicable to courses without degree plans, which will provide career development for employees in their present position with the City of Fort Worth. Tarrant Regional Water District Established in the mid-1920s by an act of the State Legislature in response to area flooding, the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 was the first special district of its type in Texas. Effective October 1, 1996, the District's new name is Tarrant Regional Water District. The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) adopted an order on September 27, 1996 authorizing this change. The primary role of the Water District is to ensure Tarrant County maintains adequate flood control and water supply. The Water District also serves cities outside Tarrant County. The City of Fort Worth contracts with the Water District as the exclusive supplier of raw water; other cities may supplement the Water District contract with other water resources such as the Trinity River Authority and the City of Arlington. Board members are elected at -large in a general district election. The advisory committee consists of five members, and the City of Fort Worth appoints one member. The Water District's taxing boundary is Tarrant County. Currently the tax rate is zero and all revenue is derived from water sales. Lakes constructed by the Water District include Eagle Mountain Lake, Bridgeport Lake, Cedar Creek Lake, Marine Creek Lake and Richland Creek Lake. GOVERNMENTAL. ENTITIES WITHOUT TAXING AUTHORITY Area Metropolitan Ambulance Authority In April 1986, the City of Fort Worth implemented a new ambulance system called the Fail -Safe Franchise Model. The system was unique in Tarrant County in that it represented the first time A-24 that an ambulance authority was established to oversee the administrative aspect of an emergency medical service system, and emergency room physicians were given responsibility for establishing clinical standards and approving medical protocols. The City also registered a trade name for the system, MedStar, so that current and future contractors could be granted a license to operate under the same name. MedStar is the sole ambulance provider in the Ambulance Authority's jurisdiction. In 1986, two municipalities were allowed to be served by Fort Worth's contractor and by the end of 1987, a third city was added. The Ambulance Authority changed in August 1988, to a multi - jurisdictional model with a coalition of ten (10) Tarrant County jurisdictions participating by contract or inter -local agreement. Uniform ambulance ordinances and operating procedures established among the various government entities in Tarrant County assures residents of the same level of medical care. The new Area Metropolitan Ambulance Authority (AMAA) administers oversight and policy authority over the contractor. The Fort Worth City Council appoints four of thesix members of the AMAA; maintains oversight authority of the rate structure for Fort Worth residents; and annually reviews AMAA's contractual/subsidy level. The AMAA offers an annual subscription program of $49 to all members jurisdiction residents. This amount pays for the uninsured portion of a person's or family's ambulance bill, regardless of the number of times an ambulance is used for medically necessary purposes during the year. MedStar provides emergency and non -emergency services. Under the terms of the City's contract with the AMAA, the Fire Department's emergency medical technicians provide the first response to emergencies. Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport The Cities of Fort Worth and Dallas own the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport jointly. It is operated by an eleven -member board comprised of the Mayor of each city, three members from Fort Worth and six members from Dallas, as appointed by the respective City Councils. The board must submit an expenditure budget for each fiscal year to the City Manager of each city by July 15th. The governing body of each city must approve the proposed budget by September 1. The Cities executed an agreement with the airport that provides for the airport to pay $30,000,000 over a maximum of 15 years to reduce the Cities' initial capital investment in land. Fort Worth's share of this amount is reflected as receivable and reserved revenue in the Capital Projects Reserve Fund. Joint revenue bonds and special facility bonds were issued to construct the airport. The Airport Board sets rentals, rates, fees and charges such that they are sufficient to produce gross revenues adequate to pay the operation and maintenance expenses, other expenses, and principal and interest on the outstanding debt. The special facility revenue bonds are payable from and secured by the net lease rentals derived from the special facilities. The Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport accounts for the outstanding debt and related debt service. The Cities have executed covenants individually, by ordinance, to levy a maintenance tax if necessary to assure that the airport will be efficiently operated and maintained. The Airport A-25 Board has entered into agreements with air carriers and other parties utilizing the airport that ° provide adjustments to rentals, fees and other charges that preclude the need for a maintenance tax. To date, no maintenance tax has been required. Fort Worth Housing AuthoritV The Fort Worth Housing Authority (FWHA) is a "public body corporate politic" governed by a five -member Board of Commissioners appointed by the Mayor for two-year terms. The Housing Authority receives funds from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Authority owns and operates 1,427 units of low -rent public housing. The Housing Authority also administers 50 units of Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation rental subsidy housing; 325 units of Section 8 Shelter Plus Care rental subsidy housing; and 3,486 units of housing financed by Housing Vouchers and 140 Portable Vouchers. Trinitv River Authoritv The Trinity River Authority (TRA) was created by the State legislature to provide planning for the Trinity River Basin, construct dams, and supply wastewater treatment through contracts with other agencies. The TRA's boundaries extend from the mouth of the Trinity River up to Tarrant and Dallas Counties (20 counties in all). The Governor appoints board members. The City of Fort Worth appoints one member to each advisory committee for each of the various special projects. Each project stands on its own, such as 1) the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant which discharges into the Trinity River, 2) the Denton Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant for Alliance Airport, and 3) construction of Joe Pool Lake. The TRA cannot take on projects without paying sponsors. The TRA has no taxing authority. NON -GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce The Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce is a non-profit organization sustained by memberships and cash contributions. The Fort Worth Chamber and the City of Fort Worth have a close working relationship to promote economic development, strengthen community relations, monitor legislative affairs, and provide public relations materials. The City participates on the Fort Worth Chamber's Board of Directors. As a member, the City also pays membership dues. Fort Worth Convention and Visitors Bureau The Fort Worth Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) is a non-profit organization with a long- term relationship with the City of Fort Worth. Its goal is the promotion of tourism and convention business in the Fort Worth area. During the summer of 1998, the City Council approved a long- term, five-year commitment to guarantee that 55% of the City of Fort Worth's 7% share of the hotel/motel occupancy tax revenues will be set aside to support CVB operations each year. The CVB derives the majority of its funds from the City's contract. North Central Texas Council of Government$ The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) was established in January 1966 to assist local governments in planning for common needs, cooperating for mutual benefit, and coordinating for sound regional development. It is a voluntary association of governments in a 16-county metropolitan region centered around the two urban centers of Fort Worth and Dallas. Fort Worth is one of the 163 member cities, 16 counties, 26 school districts, and 26 special districts. The City of Fort Worth has a permanent seat on the eleven -member NCTCOG Executive Board. The City pays membership dues annually according to a population -based formula. North Texas Commission The North Texas Commission is a regional, independent, non-profit economic development consortium made up of municipalities, chambers of commerce, and corporations established under the laws of the State of Texas for the purpose of developing regional programs both on a national and international level to market the North Texas Region. The City's only financial commitment or responsibility to the Commission is through payment of annual membership dues. The City is guaranteed a position on the Board of Directors of the organization. A-27 CITY OF FORT WORTH SERVICE STATISTICS General Land Area (square miles) 309.4 Population 516,150 (2000 North Central Texas Council of Government estimate) Population Density 2.61 persons/acre Median Age (1990) 30.3 Median Family Income (1990) $30,967 Per Capita Income (1990) $13,162 FWISD Schools 115 School Districts in Fort Worth 14 Colleges and Universities 5 Hospitals 14 Strong Neighborhoods Libraries 15 Zoo 1 209 Parks Park Acreage 10,147.94 Municipal Golf Courses 5 Community Centers 19 Neighborhood Resources Development Centers 5 Model Block Communities 10 Community Development Housing Organizations 21 Families Provided Closing Cost Assistance (average) 150/year Houses Painted During Cowtown Brush -Up Program 150 Neighborhood Associations 156 Sound Economy Convention Center City -Owned Airports 4 Meacham Spinks Alliance Dallas/Fort Worth International (jointly owned) City -Maintained Buildings 351 Streets (lane -miles) 5,625 Street Lights 40,000 Stop -Line Markings 165,000 feet Lane Markings (centerline, lane line, edge line) 970 miles Crosswalk Markings 110,000 feet Legend Markings (turn arrows, railroad, etc.) 1,600 i Open Channels throughout the City 90 miles Large Culverts and Bridges (greater than 20-foot span) 260+ Small Culverts (less than 20-foot span) 1,500+ Traffic Safety Speed Humps Under Contract 200 Speed Humps 550 Sidewalks Under Contract (linear feet) 35,400 Traffic Control Plans 135 Regular School Zones (no flashers) 115 Traffic Management System Traffic and Street Signs 88,000 Traffic Signals in Fort Worth 620 Traffic Signals Connected to a Central Computer 323 Traffic Signals in Downtown Area 127 Traffic Signals on Arterial Streets 176 Coordinated Systems of Signals 16 School Flashers 124 Intersection Flashers 28 Advance Flashers 14 Pager -Based School Flashers 124 Surveillance Cameras in Downtown Area 11 Surveillance Cameras 26 (shared use with Texas Department of Transportation) Miles of Water (Distribution) Mains 2,413 Miles of Sewer (Collector) Mains 2,338 Average Daily Water Use per Capita (gallons) 220 Total Water Purchased for Treatment (billion gallons) 63 City's Water Supply (reservoir capacity = acre-feet at spillway) Lake Worth 37,066 Eagle Mountain Lake 177,520 Lake Bridgeport 374,520 Cedar Creek Reservoir 679,415 Lake Benbrook 1,136,637 Richland -Chambers Reservoir 1,181,885 City -Owned Landfill (acres) 297 Safe Community Fire Stations 38 Neighborhood Police Districts 12 Neighborhood Police Officers 86 Storefront Police Stations 23 Citizens on Patrol (COPS) - Active 1,450/quarter FORTWORTH November 28, 2000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Fort Worth, Texas Ladies and Gentlemen: I am pleased to present to you the 2000-01 adopted budget for the City of Fort Worth. In crafting this budget plan, the staff and I have attempted to accommodate City Council priorities, as well as honor budgetary commitments made in earlier years. We have tried to balance service needs in newly developing parts of the City with those in established neighborhoods. As always, our budget recommendations are made in the context of available revenues and sound financial policies. THE ADOPTED BUDGET The City of Fort Worth's total adopted budgetary commitment for FY2000-01 is $629,898,491 for all operating funds. The adopted budget total represents an 8.2 percent increase over the $581,864,472 budget adopted in FY1999-00. Included in that adopted budget total is the addition of 49.35 new staff positions. The General Fund budget for FY2000-01, at $344,357,610, increases by 6.3 percent from the $323,854,378 General Fund budget for FY1999- 00 and includes the addition of 57.2 authorized positions. Enterprise Funds (Water and Sewer, Golf, Aviation, Solid Waste and Parking) represent a combined total of $235,113,426, which is an 8.6 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. Overall, the Enterprise Funds' authorized positions decreased by one. The Special Funds' FY2000-01 budget of $94,411,182 represents a 15.2 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget and the addition of two new positions. Since the budgets of the City's Internal Service funds are comprised of income from and expenditures for services provided to other City departments, those funds' budgetary totals are not included in the Citywide budget total. As such revenues and expenditures are merely being transferred within the City, their inclusion would essentially represent a double count. Nonetheless, for informational purposes, the total allocation for Internal Service funds, at $37,071,091, increases 10.8 percent over last fiscal year's budgeted amount, while those funds' total staffing level decreased by 8.85 positions. For a graphical summation of the FY2000-01 adopted budget, see pages E-43 to E-47 in the "Summary Information" section of the adopted budget document. CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE THE CITY OF FORT WORTH * 1000 THROCKMORTON STREET * FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 871-6111 * FAX (817) 871-6134 Prinked on recycled paper Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 28, 2000 Page 2 REVENUES Based on information provided by the Tarrant Appraisal District, the City's property tax base increased by 11.5 percent. This growth in values (a combination of new construction and appreciation of existing properties) again provides the opportunity for a tax rate reduction. For FY2000-01, the property tax rate has been reduced by one cent, bringing the rate to $0.8750 per $100 of assessed valuation. The FY2000-01 tax rate reduction is the sixth consecutive annual cut, reflecting a cumulative drop in the rate of 9.85 cents over that time period. Helping the General Fund's overall revenue picture is continued strong sales tax performance. In the current year, sales tax receipts are expected to exceed budget by $2,250,280, or 3.2 percent. A 4.4 percent increase over the current re -estimate for sales tax revenue is projected in the FY2000-01 adopted budget. Street rental charges to the Water Department and cable franchises, as well as some Municipal Court fines, are also revenue growth areas in the adopted budget. 1.00 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.86 0.84 0.82 90- 91- 92- 93- 94- 95- 96- 97- 98- 99- 00- 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 4 TAX RATE (Per $100 of property valuation) With respect to Enterprise Funds, two rate adjustments are significant. First, a combined 7.8 percent increase for retail water and sewer fees was adopted. This increase is necessitated by infrastructure investments needed to meet the demands of growth and facility upgrades required to achieve environmental quality standards. Second, it was necessary to increase the monthly residential solid waste fee by $1.25, from $11.75 to $13.00 per household. The Solid Waste Management Fund will finance the construction of a transfer station in the next year and may need to expend a substantial amoLmt of funds to open a new disposal cell at the Southeast Landfill. The adopted rate increase will support these projects. CONTINUED COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE The honoring of all previous budgetary commitments was a top priority for staff during the budget development process. At the forefront of commitments to be honored were those contained in the compensation program implemented in FY1999-00. Staff continues to support the formative tenets of that plan, which hold that: 1) the quality of services provided by a Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 28, 2000 Page 3 municipality is directly proportional to the quality and dedication of its workforce; and 2) that in order to compete effectively for qualified job candidates in a highly -competitive marketplace, the City must continue to enhance its employee compensation packages. In support of this commitment, the City Council included an additional $58,959 for pay rises for Council Aides. Classified as scheduled temporary laborers, the Council Aides would not have otherwise received the same salary increases offered to full-time City employees through the City's "step" compensation plan. As per that approved "step" plan, full-time, non-exempt City employees receive a five -percent annual salary adjustment for the first four years of service. Thereafter, all remaining non-exempt employee salary increases, or steps, are to be merit -based. Under the plan, all "professional" job classifications remain on a performance -based compensation schedule, the increases for which range from 0 — 8 percent. Beyond step and performance -based increases, the compensation plan includes additional market adjustments for certain job classifications, for which more attractive incentive packages must be offered to attract and retain workers. As per the original plan, Police and Fire civil service employees will receive a six percent, across-the-board pay increase. As Police and Fire civil service employees received an eight percent salary increase in FY1999-00, the six percent increase to be implemented in FY2000-01 fulfills the City's two-year, 14-percent total pay increase commitment made to public safety personnel. Under all of these elements of the pay proposal, no employee will be eligible for more than an I I percent salary increase next fiscal year. Based on the knowledge that the size and condition of a City's vehicular and equipment fleet is directly linked to the quality and quantity of City services provided and per the established policy directive to maintain the City's capital assets, "at a sufficient level to protect the City's investment, to minimize future replacement and maintenance costs, and to continue service levels." (Financial Management Policy Statements, Chapter II - Expenditures, Section C - Maintenance of Capital Assets), the adopted budget includes over seven million dollars for vehicle and equipment replacements and additions for all funds for the coming fiscal year. In the General Fund alone, $1,026,700 was approved for departmental vehicle and equipment replacements. Additional funding for capital improvements was also added for continued soccer field development. True to the initial commitment for funding, laid out in the five-year Soccer Management and Development Plan, the adopted budget includes the addition of $724,639 and two authorized positions for general soccer operations and maintenance for all recently developed fields. Approved funding will also provide for the renovation of two existing fields and the construction of two new fields at Gateway Park and four new fields each at West Community and Far North Community parks. To finance the $2,537,739 in total costs for the Plan's year two improvements, the General Fund's financial contribution will be matched by $1,813,100 in contributions from 1998 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Adopted budget funding levels attest to the continued importance placed by the City Council and staff on the acquisition and implementation of technological advancements. Funding for the IT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 28, 2000 Page 4 Solutions Department's LEX, or computer lease exchange, program continues, Other, continuing financial support for technology improvements includes; 1) the Development Department's Sierra Permitting System, for which approximately $226,000 was added to the FY2000-01 budget; 2) Citywide Geographic Information Systems (GIS) implementation, for which funding includes both on -going costs totaling approximately $479,686 and additional funding, in excess of $168,045, which is primarily for new personnel within City departments to manage the technology; and 3) on -going costs for the public safety Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system, ENHANCEMENTS The adopted budget includes funding that allows the City to creatively address certain pressing growth -related issues. Of paramount importance is funding to support the City's more proactive annexation policy, approved by the City Council in 1999. Implementation of the new annexation policy and resulting acquisition of surrounding properties, as well as general population growth, have had a significant financial impact on City departments striving to meet the increased demand for services. Consequently, in addition to funds included within departmental budgets that indirectly support annexation policy changes, certain additional funds directly target service provision within the newly annexed areas. For instance, the budget includes an $817,677 Fire Department allocation for operation of Fire Station #40, located in the Lake Country Estates area. 520,000 Projected Population Growth in Fort Worth 470,000 420,000 370,000 o � co — — � n cc �c- r rn o — , r — — c r_ J co co m co w cep rn rn rn rn, rn cn rn o� rn a� o� rn �3� rn cs� a� rn oz o o 5 Similarly, the adopted budget addresses quality -of -life issues by allocating funding, totaling $725,108, for one year of operations and maintenance costs at the Summerglen Library branch, located in far north Fort Worth. Particularly impacted by a more active annexation policy, the Development Department is slated to receive $119,181 in additional funding in the adopted Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 28, 2000 Page 5 budget to support expanded inspections, in the form of a Combined Residential Inspections Program, and increased map production, through the addition of a GIS Planner position. Furthermore, $70,248 has been added to the Public Health Department's budget to fund an additional Animal Control Officer and vehicle to more quickly address an ever -larger number of animal -related complaints, which have increased along with city development and expansion. Beyond annexation -related additions, the adopted budget includes funding designed to further the City's broad Safe Community goals. For example, based on city growth and City Council interest in enhancing traffic patrol operations, the adopted budget includes $250,916 to fund ten additional Traffic Officer positions. The new positions are necessitated by: 1) the transfer of seven Traffic Officers to other departmental operations since 1989; and 2) significantly - increased, citywide growth over the same period of time, which has resulted in increased land area, lane miles, traffic signals and average daily traffic on city streets. Those combined circumstances have impacted the department's ability to provide adequate traffic enforcement. The approved funding will provide for the ten new officers' salaries. These additional salary casts will indirectly be offset by increased collections resulting from increased citation issuance by an enlarged traffic enforcement unit. In conjunction with the General Fund allocation, the Crime Control and Prevention District will contribute approximately $222,382 for the training of and vehicles for the additional officers. A similar safety -enhancing allocation was the $315,200 added to the Municipal Court budget to increase building security at the Public Safety and Courts Building. The adopted allocation will finance the addition of eight Deputy City Marshal positions and one Senior Deputy City Marshal position to perform security services. These costs will be completely offset by a transfer from the Municipal Court Building Security Fund. The security -related position additions will also free five General Fund -financed Deputy City Marshals to perform additional warrant service duties. In order to provide increased security for citizens, employees and their property, the City Council approved a Library budget that included $120,000 in funding to address safety and ergonomics issues at the many Library facilities and $40,300 in funding for fire and intrusion alarms. The adopted budget also contains funding for a limited number of other top -priority, service - enhancing improvements. In recent years, the City Council has expressed a particularly keen interest in enhanced city infrastructure maintenance. In response to that direction, the Transportation and Public Works Department (T/PW) maintained funding, in the amount of $326,119, for improved drainage ditch maintenance. Intended to facilitate a more aggressive City drainage ditch maintenance program, the continued funding will pay for additional equipment purchases and four new authorized positions. An additional $100,000 was also added to T/PW's budget to enhance the City's speed hump program. Per a City Council request to increase the mowing and maintenance of public properties, an additional $100,000 was added to the $300,000 already included in the City Services Department's Code Compliance Division budget for such services. To ensure adequate maintenance of the numerous new properties added to the City's inventory through the recently adopted parkland dedication ordinance, Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 28, 2000 Page 6 $191,192 was included in the Parks and Community Services Department budget. The approved funding will provide for additional maintenance for 16 properties, five miles of median and parks and playground improvements at 29 sites. In promotion of the City's Strong Neighborhoods and Sound Economy goals, the City Council added funding for certain key programs which in various ways will enhance the quality of life in Fort Worth. In accordance with established City policy to, "encourage close cooperation with other .. . groups interested in promoting the economic well-being of this area." (Financial Management Policy Statements, Chapter IX — Economic Development, Section E - Coordinate Efforts with Other Jurisdictions), the City Council approved an additional $60,000 to assist the Sister Cities program with core expenses, in order to better position it to provide an increased number of services. To ensure continued protection of important community resources, an additional $40,000 was approved to rebuild the fence around the Japanese Gardens, located within the City's Botanic Gardens. In order to improve the resources available to troubled youth in the community, the City Council authorized $41,000 in additional funding for Tarrant County Challenge, Inc. The City Council acknowledged the importance to the community of widely available, vital arts programs by authorizing $30,000 in additional funding to the Arts Council of Fort Worth. The Arts Council of Fort Worth will dedicate that additional funding to its Neighborhood Arts Program to enrich an estimated 9,000 additional local children through exposure to arks and/or cultural events. In addition, certain service -enhancing technological innovations were also funded in the FY2000-01 adopted budget. The Code Compliance Division of the City Services Department has been allocated $60,000 for the purchase of the VOCARTA automated property ownership identification system, which will enable field personnel to automatically correlate lot, block and ownership information to properties in violation of the City Code. The Engineering Department will receive $104,305 for implementation of a complete Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) survey system to assist the department in its land surveying and other engineering duties, as well as its integration of survey data into the City's GIS. GPS implementation costs will be offset by salary savings obtained by the restructuring of the department's Survey Division and the elimination of eleven full-time and temporary departmental employees. Per a City Council request for a more integrated, comprehensive system to track responses to citizen inquiries and suggestions, $166,760 is included in the Non -Departmental budget for the purchase of such a system. In order to enhance the productivity and effectiveness of the City Attorney's staff, $120,422 has also been added in the Law Department's budget for hardware and software computer improvements, as well as on-line access to the Westlaw legal research service. I thank the City Council and staff for remaining flexible and maintaining open minds and dialogue during the FY2000-01 budget formation process. I believe you will find that the net result of that dialogue and those interactions is a well-balanced, forward thinking operating Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council November 28, 2000 Page 7 plan, which best allows the City to confront existing challenges head-on and take full advantage of existing opportunities in the new fiscal year, while remaining fiscally sound, 1�� 2_0_�� Bob Terrell City Manager FINANCE DEPARTMENT .TAMES KEYES, DIRECTOR 1000 THROCKMORTON STREET3F C-1 FORT WORTH, TExAS 76102 PHONE (817) 871-8185 FAX (817) 871-8966 INANCIAL AGEMENT ATEMENTS C-2 Financial Management Policy Statements Revised: November 21, 1995 (M&C G-11307 February 11, 1997 (M&C 0-11750 Revised) September 16, 1997 (M&C G-11997) September 15, 1998 (M&C G-12319) September 28,1999 (M&C 0-12682) February 22, 2000 (M&C G-12821) May 16, 2000 (M&C 0-12916) August 15, 2000 (M&C G-12988) Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) Page 1 C-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary...................................................................................................... 1 I. Revenues............................................................................................ 3 Ii. Expenditures......................................................................................5 III. Fund Balance/Retained Earnings ................................................... 7 Iv. Capital Expenditures and Improvements ..................................... 9 v. Debt.....................................................................................................11 VI. Investments........................................................................................17 vii. Intergovernmental Relations........................................................... 21 vni. Grants..................................................................................................23 Ix. Economic Development................................................................... 25 x. Fiscal Monitoring.............................................................................. 27 xi. Financial Consultants....................................................................... 29 xii. Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting ........................... 31 xiII. Retirement System............................................................................ 33 xiv. Internal Controls.............................................................................. 35 1 C-4 To establish and document a policy framework for fiscal decision -making, the City Manager will develop and maintain a comprehensive set of Financial Management Policy Statements. The aim of these policies is to ensure that financial resources are available to meet the present and future needs of the citizens of Fort Worth. Specifically this policy framework mandates the pursuit of the following fiscal objectives: 1. Revenues: Design, maintain and administer a revenue system that will assure a reliable, equitable, diversified and sufficient revenue stream to support desired City services. 2. Expenditures: Identify priority services, establish appropriate service levels and administer the expenditure of available resources to assure fiscal stability and the effective and efficient delivery of services. 3. Fund Balance/Retained Earnings: Maintain the fund balance and retained earnings of the various operating funds at levels sufficient to protect the City's creditworthiness as well as its financial position from emergencies. 4. Capital Expenditures and Improvements: Annually review and monitor the state of the City's capital equipment and infrastructure, setting priorities for its replacement and renovation based on needs, funding alternatives, and availability of resources. 5. Debt: Establish guidelines for debt financing that will provide needed capital equipment and infrastructure improvements while minimizing the impact of debt payments on current revenues. b. Investments: Invest the City's operating cash to ensure its safety, provide for necessary liquidity and optimize yield. 7. Intergovernmental Relations: Coordinate efforts with other governmental agencies to achieve common policy objectives, share the cost of providing governmental services on an equitable basis and support favorable legislation at the state and federal level. 8. Grants: Seek, apply for and effectively administer federal, state and foundation grants-in-aid which address the City's current priorities and policy objectives. , ... Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15,200D)Page 1 C-5 9. Economic Development: Initiate, encourage and participate in economic development efforts to create job opportunities and strengthen the local economy. 10. Fiscal Monitoring: Prepare and present regular reports that analyze, evaluate, and forecast the City's financial performance and economic condition. 11. Financial Consultants: With available resources, seek out and employ the assistance of qualified financial advisors and consultants in the management and administration of the City's financial functions. 12. Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting: Comply with prevailing federal, state and local statutes and regulations, as well as current professional principles and practices. 13. Retirement System: Ensure that the Employees' Retirement Fund is adequately funded and operated for the exclusive benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries. 14. Internal Controls: Maintain an internal control structure designed to provide reasonable assurance that City assets are safeguarded and that the possibilities for material errors in the City's financial records are minimized. Page 2 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-6 To design, maintain and administer a revenue system that will assure a reliable, equitable, diversified and sufficient revenue stream to support desired City services. A. Balance and Diversification in Revenue Sources The City shall strive to maintain a balanced and diversified revenue system to protect the City from fluctuations in any one source due to changes in local economic conditions which adversely impact that source. B. User Fees For services that benefit specific users, the City shall establish and collect fees to recover the costs of those services. The City Council shall determine the appropriate cost recovery level and establish the fees. Where feasible and desirable, the City shall seek to recover full direct and indirect costs. User fees shall be reviewed on a regular basis to calculate their full cost recovery levels, to compare them to the current fee structure, and to recommend adjustments where necessary. C. Property Tax Revenues/Tax Burden The City shall endeavor to reduce its reliance on property tax revenues by revenue diversification, implementation of user fees, and economic development. The City shall also strive to minimize the property tax burden on Fort Worth citizens. D. Lltility/Enterprise Funds User Fees Utility rates and enterprise funds user fees shall be set at levels sufficient to cover operating expenditures, meet debt obligations, provide additional funding for capital improvements, and provide adequate levels of working capital. The City shall seek to eliminate all forms of subsidization to utility/enterprise funds from the General Fund. E. Administrative Services Charges The City shall establish a method to determine annually the administrative services charges due the General Fund from enterprise funds for overhead and Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 1 g 5, 2000 Page 3 C-7 staff support. Where appropriate, the enterprise funds shall pay the General Fund for direct services rendered. F. Revenue Estimates for Budgeting In order to maintain a stable level of services, the City shall use a conservative, objective, and analytical approach when preparing revenue estimates. The process shall include analysis of probable economic changes and their impacts on revenues, historical collection rates, and trends in revenues. This approach should reduce the likelihood of actual revenues falling short of budget estimates during the year and should avoid mid -year service reductions. G. Revenue Collection and Administration The City shall maintain high collection rates for all revenues by keeping the revenue system as simple as possible in order to facilitate payment. In addition, since a revenue should exceed the cost of producing it, the City shall strive to control and reduce administrative costs. The City shall pursue to the full extent allowed by state law all delinquent taxpayers and others overdue in payments to the City. Page 4 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) II. To assure fiscal stability and the effective and efficient delivery of services, through the identification of necessary services, establishment of appropriate service levels, and careful administration of the expenditure of available resources. A. Current Funding Basis The City shall operate on a current funding basis. Expenditures shall be budgeted and controlled so as not to exceed current revenues plus the planned use of fund balance accumulated through prior year savings. (The use of fund balance shall be guided by the Fund Balance/Retained Earnings Policy Statements.) B. Avoidance of Operating Deficits The City shall take immediate corrective actions if at any time during the fiscal year expenditure and revenue re -estimates are such that an operating deficit (i.e., projected expenditures in excess of projected revenues) is projected at year-end. Corrective actions can include a hiring freeze, expenditure reductions, fee increases, or use of fund balance within the Fund Balance/Retained Earnings Policy. Expenditure deferrals into the following fiscal year, short-term loans, or use of one-time revenue sources shall be avoided to balance the budget. C. Maintenance of Capital Assets Within the resources available each fiscal year, the City shall maintain capital assets and infrastructure at a sufficient level to protect the City`s investment, to minimize future replacement and maintenance costs, and to continue service levels. D. Periodic Program Reviews The City Manager shall undertake periodic staff and third -party reviews of City programs for both efficiency and effectiveness. Privatization and contracting with other governmental agencies will be evaluated as alternative approaches to service delivery. Programs which are determined to be inefficient and/or ineffective shall be reduced in scope or eliminated. Financial Management Policy Statement s (Adopted August 15, 2000) Page 5 C-9 E. Purchasing The City shall make every effort to maximize any discounts offered by creditors/vendors. Staff shall also use competitive bidding to attain the best possible price on goods and services. Page 6 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-'10 To maintain the fund balance and retained earnings of the various operating funds at levels sufficient to protect the City's creditworthiness as well as its financial positions from unforeseeable emergencies. A. General Fund Undesignated Fund Balance The City shall strive to maintain the General Fund undesignated fund balance at 10 percent of current year budget expenditures. After completion of the annual audit, if the undesignated fund balance exceeds 10 percent, the excess must be specifically designated for subsequent year expenditures or transferred to the Capital Projects Reserve Fund. (The use of this Fund shall be guided by the Capital Expenditures and Improvements Policy Statements.) B. Retained Earnings of Other Operating Funds In other enterprise operating funds, the City shall strive to maintain positive retained earnings positions to provide sufficient reserves for emergencies and revenue shortfalls. Specifically, in the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund, an operating reserve will be established and maintained at 20 percent of the current year's budget appropriation for operation and maintenance, which is defined as the total budget less debt service and capital project expenditures. C. Use of Fund Balance/Retained Earnings Fund Balance/Retained Earnings shall be used only for emergencies, non- recurring expenditures, or major capital purchases that can not be accommodated through current year savings. Should such use reduce the balance below the appropriate level set as the objective for that fund, restoration recommendations will accompany the decision to utilize said balance. D. Retained Earnings of Internal Service Funds The City shall not regularly maintain positive retained earnings in excess of 20 percent of the current year's operation and maintenance expense in an internal service fund. Normally, when an internal service fund's retained earnings exceed 20 percent, the City shall reduce the charges for services provided by the internal service fund to other City operating funds. Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000 )... Page 7 C-11 E. Debt Service Funds The City shall maintain sufficient reserves in its debt service funds which shall equal or exceed the reserve fund balances required by bond ordinances. Page 8 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-12 To annually review and monitor the state of the City's capital equipment and infrastructure, setting priorities for its replacement and renovation based on needs, funding, alternatives, and availability of resources. A. Capital Improvement PIanning Program The City shall annually review the needs for capital improvements and equipment, the current status of the City's infrastructure, replacement and renovation needs, and potential new projects. All projects, ongoing and proposed, shall be prioritized based on an analysis of current needs and resource availability. For every capital project, all operation, maintenance and replacement costs shall be fully costed. B. Replacement of Capital Assets on a Regular Schedule The City shall annually prepare a schedule for the replacement of its non - infrastructure capital assets. Within the resources available each fiscal year, the City shall replace these assets according to the aforementioned schedule. C. Capital Expenditure Financing The City recognizes that there are three basic methods of financing its capital requirements. It can budget the funds from current revenues; it can take the funds from fund balance/retained earnings as allowed by the Fund Balance/Retained Earnings Policy; or it can borrow money through debt. Debt financing includes general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, certificates of obligation, lease/purchase agreements, certificates of participation, commercial paper, and other obligations permitted to be issued or incurred under Texas law. Guidelines for assuming debt are set forth in the Debt Policy Statements. D. Capital Projects Reserve Fund A Capital Projects Reserve Fund shall be established and maintained to accumulate reimbursements from other governmental agencies for the prior purchase of real assets, as well as transfers from the General Fund undesignated fund balance. This fund shall only be used to pay for non -routine and one-time . Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) Page 9 C-13 expenditures such as land and building purchases, construction and maintenance projects with a 10-year life, capital equipment and vehicles with a 10-year life, and technology improvements with a 5-year Iife. Expenditures from this Fund shall be aimed at protecting the health and safety of citizens and employees, protecting the existing assets of the City, ensuring public access to City facilities and information, and promoting community -wide economic development. E. Demolition Fund Proceeds from the sale of surplus real property assets, other than Lake Worth leases, shall be escrowed and designated for paying the costs of demolishing substandard and condemned buildings. F. Lake Worth Infrastructure Fund Proceeds from the sale of Lake Worth leases shall be escrowed and designated for water and wastewater improvements within the area of the City of Fort Worth surrounding and adjoining Lake Worth. Page 10 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-14 1� To utilize debt financing which will provide needed capital equipment and infrastructure improvements while minimizing the impact of debt payments on current revenues. A. Use of Debt Financing Debt financing, to include general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, certificates of obligation, certificates of participation, commercial paper, lease/purchase agreements, and other obligations permitted to be issued or incurred under Texas law, shall only be used to purchase capital assets that cannot be acquired from either current revenues or fund balance/retained earnings and to fund infrastructure improvements and additions. The useful life of the asset or project shall exceed the payout schedule of any debt the City assumes. B. Assumption of Additional Debt The City shall not assume more tax -supported general purpose debt than it retires each year without conducting an objective analysis as to the community's ability to assume and support additional debt service payments. When appropriate, self- supporting revenue bonds shall be issued before general obligation bonds. C. Affordabilihj Targets 1. General Obligation Bonds The City shall use an objective analytical approach to determine whether it can afford to assume new general purpose debt beyond what it retires each year. This process shall compare generally accepted standards of affordability to the current values for the City. These standards shall include debt per capita, debt as a percent of taxable value, debt service payments as a percent of current revenues and current expenditures, and the Ievel of overlapping net debt of all local taxing jurisdictions. The process shall also examine the direct costs and benefits of the proposed expenditures. The decision on whether or not to assume new debt shall be based on these costs and benefits, the current conditions of the municipal bond market, and the City's ability to "afford" new debt as determined by the aforementioned standards. The City shall strive to achieve and/or maintain these standards at a low to moderate classification. Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) Pa ge 11 C-15 2. Revenue Bonds For the City to issue new revenue bonds, revenues, as defined in the ordinance authorizing the revenue bonds in question, shall be a minimum of 125% of the average annual debt service and 110% of the debt service for the year in which requirements are scheduled to be the greatest, but should be maintained at 150% of the maximum annual debt service for financial planning purposes. Annual adjustments to the City's rate structures will be made as necessary to maintain a 150% coverage factor. D. Debt Structure The City shall normally issue bonds with an average life of 10.5 years or less for general obligation bonds and 12.0 years for revenue bonds. The structure should approximate level principal on general obligation bonds and level debt service for revenue bonds. There shall be no debt structures which include increasing debt service levels in subsequent years, with the first and second year of a bond payout schedule the exception. There shall be no "balloon" bond repayment schedules which consist of low annual payments and one large payment of the balance due at the end of the term. There shall always be at least interest paid in the first fiscal year after a bond sale and principal starting generally no later than the second fiscal year after the bond issue. Normally, there shall be no capitalized interest included in the debt structure unless there are no historical reserves upon which to draw. E. Call Provisions Call provisions for bond issues shall be made as short as possible consistent with the lowest interest cost to the City. When possible, all bonds shall be callable only at par. F. Sale Process The City shall use a competitive bidding process in the sale of . debt unless the nature of the issue warrants a negotiated sale. The City shall attempt to award the bonds based on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. However, the City may award bonds based on a net interest cost (NIC) basis as long as the financial advisor agrees that the NIC basis can satisfactorily determine the lowest and best bid. Page 12 Financial Manag ement Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-16 G. Rating Agencies Presentations Full disclosure of operations and open lines of communication shall be made to the rating agencies. City staff, with assistance of financial advisors, shall prepare the necessary materials and presentation to the rating agencies. Credit ratings will be sought from one or more of the nationally recognized municipal bond rating agencies, currently Moody's, Standard & Poor's, and Fitch IBCA, as recommended by the City's financial advisor. H. Continuing Disclosure The City is committed to providing continuing disclosure of financial and pertinent credit information relevant to the City's outstanding securities and will abide by the provisions of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 15c2- 12 concerning primary and secondary market disclosure. City staff, with the assistance of the City's financial advisors and, if necessary, the City's bond counsel, will undertake to update financial and pertinent credit information within six months of the end of the City's fiscal year. I. Debt Refunding City staff and the financial advisor shall monitor the municipal bond market for opportunities to obtain interest savings by refunding outstanding debt. As a general rule, the present value savings of a particular refunding should exceed 3.5 % of the refunded maturities. J. Interest Earnings Interest earnings received on the investment of bond proceeds shall be used to assist in paying the interest due on bond issues, to the extent permitted by law. K. Lease/Purchase Agreements Over the lifetime of a lease, the total cost to the City will generally be higher than purchasing the asset outright. As a result, the use of lease/purchase agreements and certificates of participation in the acquisition of vehicles, equipment and other capital assets shall generally be avoided, particularly if smaller quantities of the capital asset(s) can be purchased on a "pay-as-you-go" basis. Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopt ed August 15, 2000) Page 13 C-17 L. Proposals from Investment Bankers The City welcomes ideas and suggestions from investment bankers and will seek to reward those firms, which submit unique and innovative ideas by involving them in negotiated underwritings. Unsolicited proposals should be submitted to the City's financial advisors simultaneously with their submission to the City's Finance Department. City staff will review and confer with financial advisors to determine viability of proposals. M. Underwriting Syndicates The City attempts to involve qualified and experienced firms, which consistently submit ideas to the City and actively participate in the City's competitive sales in its negotiated underwritings. In conjunction with the City's financial advisors, City staff will recommend the structure of underwriting syndicates which will be effective for the type and amount of debt being issued. The City will consider its M/WBE goals in structuring syndicates. N. Interest Rate Swaps The City will consider the utilization of interest rate swap transactions only as they relate to the City's debt management program and not as an investment instrument or hedge. As a result, any swap transaction should not impair the outstanding bond rating of the City or negatively affect the amount of credit enhancement capacity available to the City. The City is always open to innovative ideas and proposals; however, before a commitment is made on a proposed transaction, the proposed transaction as well as variations from the following guidelines shall be fully explained and justified to the Council. 1. The Transaction ❑ Will comply with all applicable outstanding bond ordinance and insurance covenants. ❑ Will be a market transaction for which competing quotes can be obtained at the discretion of the City staff, upon the advice of the City's financial advisor. © WiIl include a market termination provision with third party involvement. • Will produce a material economic benefit not attainable through the use of conventional debt instruments. Page 14 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adapted August 15, 2000) C-18 ❑ Will introduce no leverage in order to produce an economic benefit. ❑ Will not impair the utilization of outstanding call features on outstanding bonds. ❑ Will be structured to minimize any basis risk, tax -law risk and credit risk to the City. ❑ Will not cause the total amount of swap transactions to exceed 40 percent (40%) of the outstanding indebtedness of a particular fund. 2. The Countervarty ❑ Shall pay all costs associated with the transaction. All fees and expenses paid by the counterparty to third parties will be disclosed in writing to the City. ❑ Must have a rating at least equal to that of the City's indebtedness against which the transaction is to be entered, or must provide for the purchase of a credit enhancement to enhance its rating to the rating of such City indebtedness. ❑ Shall consider downgrade protection, when possible and cost effective. ❑ Shall not assign the swap contract without the consent of the City. ❑ Shall clearly explain the impact on the transaction of the counterparty's bankruptcy. 3. Analvsis ❑ Swap proposals submitted by investment firms for consideration by the City shall include a clear analysis, which identifies both the potential benefits and risks associated with the proposed transaction. ❑ The City's financial advisor will produce an analysis of various interest rate market fluctuations at periodic intervals to demonstrate the impact of interest rate market movements. ❑ The City's cost of the transaction and any anticipated future costs will be included in the cost/benefit analysis. Financial Management Policy Statements((Adopted August 15, 2000) Page 15 C-9 9 ❑ The City's financial advisor will monitor the results of an adopted swap transaction throughout its life and recommend termination when substantial economic benefit would accrue to the City upon termination. 4. Legal a The documentation of the swap shall be in the form of an International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc., Master Agreement with attachments, commonly referred to as an ISDA document. ❑ The swap, whenever possible, shall be transacted under Texas law and jurisdiction. ❑ Approval of the transaction must be obtained from the State Attorney General, to the extent required by Texas law. 4. Synthetic Advanced Refundings The City will consider synthetic advance refundings, which produce a material economic benefit and will in no way impair the outstanding bond rating of the City. 1. The present value savings of the transaction must be quantifiable, exceed 7 percent (7%) of the refunded maturities, and not be based on projection. 2. Proposals submitted by investment firms for consideration by the City shall identify and address not only the benefits of the proposed transaction, but the potential negative impacts as well. 3. Additional transaction costs such as bond counsel, trustee, and financial advisor shall be included in the savings calculation required above. 4. The City's financial advisor shall produce an analysis of the implications of paying a forward premium vs. waiting to the current call date of the bonds. 5. Approval of the transaction must be obtained from the State Attorney General, to the extent required by Texas law. Page 16 Financial Ma nagement Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-20 VI. To invest the City's cash in such a manner so as to insure the absolute safety of principal and interest, to meet the liquidity needs of the City, and to achieve the highest possible yield. A. Cash Management Policy (M&C G-9552, March 12, 1992) Subject to approval by the City Manager and the Director of Finance, the City Treasurer is both authorized and required to promulgate a written Statement of Cash Management Rules and Regulations governing the City's cash management and investment activities (exclusive of the investment activities of the Employees' Retirement Fund), and to institute and administer such specific procedures and criteria as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the City's cash management policy. Specifically, this policy mandates the pursuit of the following overall goals and objectives: 1. All aspects of cash management operations shall be designed to ensure the absolute safety and integrity of the City's financial assets. 2. Cash management activities shall be conducted in full compliance with prevailing local, state and federal regulations. Furthermore, such activities shall be designed to adhere to guidelines and standards promulgated by such professional organizations as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). 3. Operating within appropriately -established administrative and procedural parameters, the City shall aggressively pursue optimum financial rewards, while simultaneously controlling its related expenditures. Therefore, cash management functions which engender interaction with outside financial intermediaries shall be conducted in the best financial and administrative interests of the City. In pursuit of these interests, the City will utilize competitive bidding practices wherever practicable, affording no special financial advantage to any individual or corporate member of the financial or investment community. Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) Page 17 C-21 4. The City shall design and enforce written standards and guidelines relating to a variety of cash management issues, such as the eligibility or selection of various financial intermediaries, documentation and safekeeping requirements; philosophical and operational aspects of the investment function; and such other functional and administrative aspects of the cash management program which necessitate standard setting in pursuit of appropriate prudence, enhanced protection of assets or procedural improvements. 5. Investments of the City, or of funds held in its possession in a fiduciary capacity, shall be made with the exercise of that judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable. safety of their capital, as well as the probable income to be derived. B. Investment Strategy (M&C G-11199, August 21, 1995 -Modified March 31, 1997) The City of Fort Worth maintains a Consolidated Portfolio in which it pools its funds for investment purposes. The City's cash management program seeks to achieve three objectives in this order of priority: safety of principal, adequate liquidity to meet daily cash needs, and finally a reasonable yield commensurate with the preservation of principal and Iiquidity. The following investment strategy has been designed to accomplish these objectives: 1. The City invests in "money market instruments," very creditworthy, highly liquid investments with maturities of one year or less, and in intermediate - term securities of high credit quality with maturities no greater than five years. The City will only invest in those securities specified in its "List of Eligible Investments". These include U.S. Treasury Bills and Notes, high quality obligations of certain U.S. agencies and instrumentalities, and AAA - rated local government investment pools and no-load money market mutual funds. Any securities not on this list will not be eligible investments. 2. At all times, the City shall maintain a cash position sufficient to meet daily liquidity requirements. This will be accomplished by maintaining approximately 15 percent of the total portfolio in money market funds, local government investment pools and/or overnight repurchase agreements. The City shall also position some investments to provide liquidity for certain predictable obligations such as debt service payments. Page 18 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-22 3. The City shall not exceed a weighted average maturity of two years for the Consolidated Portfolio. The City shall strive to maintain this weighted average maturity by investing funds according to the following general maturity diversification guidelines: Maturity Cash I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year Day Range 0 1-365 365-730 730-1095 1095-1460 1460-1825 % Portfolio 10 28 14.25 14.25 14.25 14.25 There may be times when the City has more or less of its funds in any one maturity cell due to cash flow needs, prevailing market conditions, and other factors. The maturity diversification schedule serves as a general guideline for making investment decisions. In this way, the portfolio will be able to take advantage of rising interest rates by re -investing maturing securities at higher yields. In falling rate environments, it will profit from having investments that were made at higher interest rates. Following this discipline ensures that the City will always have sufficient cash available for daily needs, preserves its principal and never has too much money in any one maturity area, whether it be short-term or long. In this manner, the Consolidated Portfolio will earn a competitive yield without assuming unacceptable risk. C. Interest Earnings Interest earned from investments shall be distributed to the operating, internal service, and other City funds from which the money was provided, with the exception that interest earnings received on the investment of bond proceeds shall be attributed and allocated to those debt service funds responsible for paying the principal and interest due on the particular bond issue. D. Designated Investment Committee Upon Council adoption of the Cash Management Policy and the promulgation of the Statement of Cash Management Rules and Regulations, a Cash Management Task Force comprised of the Assistant City Manager over Finance, the Finance Department Director, the City Treasurer, the Deputy City Treasurer, and other Financial Management Policy Statements {Adopted August 15, 2000) Page . ge 19 C-23 City staff as deemed appropriate by the City Manager is established. This group will serve as the City's designated investment committee required under the State Public Funds Investment Act. The Task Force will regularly examine and evaluate the City's cash management and investment activities and recommend revisions to operational rules and regulations, the Cash Management Policy, and the Investment Strategy. Modifications to the administrative rules and regulations will be submitted to the City Manager for approval. Amendments to the Cash Management Policy and/or Investment Strategy will be presented to the City Council for adoption. E. Investment Portfolio Rating The City has received an AAA rating of its investment portfolio from Fitch IBCA. The City will manage its cash according to procedures and strategies to maintain such a rating. Page 20 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-24 1i l s ri To coordinate efforts with other governmental agencies to achieve common policy objectives, share the cost of providing government services on an equitable basis, and support favorable legislation at the state and federal levels. A. Inter -local Cooperation in Delivering Services In order to promote the effective and efficient delivery of services, the City shall actively seek to work with other local jurisdictions in joint purchasing consortia, sharing facilities, sharing equitably the costs of service delivery, and developing joint programs to improve service to its citizens. B. Legislative Program The City shall cooperate with other jurisdictions to actively oppose any state or federal regulation or proposal that mandates additional City programs or services and does not provide the funding to implement them. Conversely, as appropriate, the City shall support legislative initiatives that provide more funds for priority local programs. Financi al Management Policy State g Y i ... Statements Adopted August I5, 2000) Page 21 C-25 (Intentionally blank) Wage 22 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-26 VIII To seek, apply for and effectively administer federal, state and foundation grants-in-aid that address the City's current priorities and policy objectives. A. Grant Guidelines The City shall apply, and facilitate the application by others, for only those grants that are consistent with the objectives and high priority needs previously identified by Council. The potential for incurring ongoing costs, to include the assumption of support for grant -funded positions from local revenues, will be considered prior to applying for a grant. B. Indirect Costs The City shall recover full indirect costs unless the funding agency does not permit it. The City may waive or reduce indirect costs if doing so will significantly increase the effectiveness of the grant. C. Grant Review All grant submittals shall be reviewed for their cash match requirements, their potential impact on the operating budget, and the extent to which they meet the City's policy objectives. Departments shall seek Council approval prior to submission of a grant application. Should time constraints under the grant program make this impossible, the department shall obtain approval to submit an application from the appropriate Assistant City Manager and then, at the earliest feasible time, seek formal Council approval. if there are cash match requirements, the source of funding shall be identified prior to application. An annual report on the status of grant programs and their effectiveness shall also be prepared. D. Grant Program Termination The City shall terminate grant -funded programs and associated positions when grant funds are no longer available unless alternate funding is identified. Financial Management Policy Stateme nts (Adapted August 15, 2000) Page 23 ;�'•il (Intentionally blank) Page 24 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) , W81 IX. To initiate, encourage and participate in economic development efforts to create job opportunities and strengthen the local economy. A. Positive Business Environment The City shall endeavor, through its regulatory and administrative functions, to provide a positive business environment in which local businesses can grow, flourish and create jobs. The City Council and City staff will be sensitive to the needs, concerns and issues facing local businesses. B. Commitment to Business Expansion, Diversification, and Job Creation The City shall encourage and participate in economic development efforts to expand Fort Worth's economy and tax base and to increase local employment. These efforts shall not only focus on newly developing areas but on inner city areas, the Central Business District, and other established sections of Fort Worth where development can generate additional jobs and other economic benefits. C. Tax Abatements The City shall follow a tax abatement policy (adopted December 8, 1992, M&C G- 9945, and last revised February 24, 1998, M&C G-12143) to encourage commercial growth and development throughout Fort Worth, The City shall use due caution in the analysis of any tax incentives used to encourage development. Factors considered in evaluating proposed abatements for development include the location of the project, its size, the number of temporary and permanent jobs created, the costs and benefits for the City and its impact on Fort Worth's economy. The City will annually review tax abatement contracts to ensure the community is receiving promised benefits, and the Council may seek to modify or re -negotiate an abatement contract if it is determined that the firm receiving the abatement has failed to keep its part of the agreement. D. Increase Non-residential Share of Tax Base The City's economic development program shall seek to expand the non- residential share of the tax base to decrease the tax burden on residential homeowners. Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2p g g ��) Page ,25 . , C-29 E. Coordinate Efforts with Other Jurisdictions The City's economic development program shall encourage close cooperation with other local jurisdictions, chambers of commerce, and groups interested in promoting the economic well-being of this area. R Use of Other Incentives The City shall use enterprise zones as allowed by law to encourage business expansion. The City shall also coordinate with state and federal agencies on offering any incentive programs they may provide for potential economic expansion. The factors used to evaluate possible recipients of any incentives shall include those listed in C. Tax Abatements. Page 26 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) 'Mill /a To prepare and present regular reports that analyze, evaluate and forecast the City's financial performance and economic condition. A. Financial Status and Performance Reports Monthly reports comparing expenditures and revenues to current budget, projecting expenditures and revenues through the end of the year, noting the status of fund balances to include dollar amounts and percentages, and outlining any remedial actions necessary to maintain the City's financial position shall be prepared for review by the City Manager and the Council. B. Five-year Forecast of Revenues and Expenditures A five-year forecast of revenues and expenditures, to include a discussion of major trends affecting the City's financial position, shall be prepared in anticipation of the annual budget process. The forecast shall also examine critical issues facing the City, economic conditions, and the outlook for the upcoming budget year. The document shall incorporate elements of the International City Management Association financial trend monitoring system to provide further insight into the City's financial position and to alert the Council to potential problem areas requiring attention. C. Quarterly Status Report on Capital Projects A summary report on the contracts awarded, capital projects completed and the status of the City's various capital programs will be prepared at least quarterly and presented to the City Manager and the Council. D. Compliance with Council Policy Statements The Financial Management Policy Statements will be reviewed annually by the Council and updated, revised or refined as deemed necessary. Policy statements adopted by the Council are guidelines, and occasionally, exceptions may be appropriate and required. However, exceptions to stated policies will be specifically identified, and the need for the exception will be documented and fully explained. Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) Page 27 - C-31 (Intentionally blank) Page 28 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C--32 Xl. To employ the assistance of qualified financial advisors and consultants as needed in the management and administration of the City's financial functions. These areas include but are not limited to investments, debt administration, financial accounting systems, program evaluation, and financial impact modeling. Advisors shall be selected using objective questionnaires and requests for qualifications/proposals based upon demonstrated expertise relative to the scope of work to be performed and appropriately competitive fees. Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) Page gu 29 C-33 (Intentionally blank) Page 30 Financial Management Policy Stat ements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-34 XII. A�oV . " Cr AAtI`i'I(, A1�I To comply with prevailing local, state, and federal regulations, as well as current professional principles and practices relative to accounting, auditing, and financial reporting. A. Conformance to Accounting Principles The City's accounting practices and financial reporting shall conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). B. Popular Reporting In addition to issuing a comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) in conformity with GAAP, the City shall supplement its CAFR with a simpler, "popular" report designed to assist those citizens who need or desire a less detailed overview of the City's financial activities. This report should be issued no later than six months after the close of the fiscal year. C. Selection of Auditors Every five years, the City shall request proposals from all qualified firms, including the current auditors if their past performance has been satisfactory, and the City Council shall select an independent firm of certified public accountants to perform an annual audit of the books of account, records and transactions, certifying the financial statements of the City. ............................... ............ Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) _. _....... ....... .... Page 31 C-35 (Intentionally blank) Page..32 Financial Manag ement Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-36 XIII. To ensure that the Employees' Retirement Fund is adequately funded and operated for the exclusive benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries. A. .benefit Improvements The Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement Fund shall certify to the City Council the actuarial impact of any proposed benefit improvements or changes in contribution levels. The Council will assure that sufficient funding will be available to pay for the liabilities created by benefit improvements and other plan changes. Improvements should generally be designed to benefit the membership of the Retirement System as a whole. B. Qualified Plan The City will maintain the qualified status of the Retirement System. As deemed necessary from time to time, the City will request a "determination letter" from the IRS relative to whether or not the City's retirement system conforms to the Internal Revenue Code in order to assure the tax-exempt status of the income earned on the Retirement Fund's investments, the retiree pension payments and the accrued benefits for active employees. Financial Management .Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) Page 33 C-37 (intentionally blank) Page 34 Financial Management Policy Statements (Adopted August 15, 2000) C-38 XIV. To establish and maintain an internal control structure designed to provide reasonable assurance that City assets are safeguarded and that the possibilities for material errors in the City's financial records are minimized. A. Proper Authorizations Procedures shall be designed, implemented and maintained to ensure that financial transactions and activities are properly reviewed and authorized. B. Separation of Duties Job duties will be adequately separated to reduce to an acceptable level the opportunities for any person to be in a position to both perpetrate and conceal errors or irregularities in the normal course of assigned duties. C. Pro -per Recordiny, Procedures shall be developed and maintained that will ensure financial transactions and events are properly recorded and that all financial reports may be relied upon as accurate, complete and up-to-date. D. Access to Assets and Records Procedures shall be designed and maintained to ensure that adequate safeguards exist over the access to and use of financial assets and records. E. Independent Checks Independent checks and audits will be made on staff performance to ensure compliance with established procedures and proper valuation of recorded amounts. F. Costs and Benefits Internal control systems and procedures must have an apparent benefit in terms of reducing and/or preventing losses. The cost of implementing and maintaining any control system should be evaluated against the expected benefits to be derived from that system. g ._... _ .... p. ,... ............ Financial Mana ement Poll Statements Ado ted Au st 15, 2000) Page 35 D-3 The FY2000-01 Adopted Budget Document for the City of Fort Worth provides historical, present, and future comparisons of revenues and expenditures; adopted allocations of resources - both fiscal and personnel; and descriptions of the anticipated annual accomplishments of City programs. FUND STRUCTURE Operating budgets are divided into several different funds. First, activities supported by tax dollars are included in the General Fund, Enterprise Funds are those that are funded on a fee -for -service basis, such as the Water and Sewer Fund. Services that are provided internally by City departments for City departments on a fee -for -service basis, such as the Print Shop, are specified as Internal Service Funds. Finally, Special Funds are financial accounts for special revenue sources. An example is the Health and Life Insurance Fund that administers revenue collected in the form of insurance premiums. Each of these fund types is included in the City of Fort Worth Proposed Budget. BUDGET DOCUMENT STRUCTURE The Budget Document itself is divided into several sections. The first section contains an overview of the City's budget through the budget message and the budget synopsis. Summaries of total revenues and expenditures, as well as information on tax base and rate, are included. This section also describes personnel resources by department. Finally, a calendar for budget consideration is included. CITY GOALS FOR GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTS Overall, the City of Fort Worth has concentrated on three goals: strong neighborhoods, a sound economy, and a safe community. These categories are interrelated and all departments strive toward the achievement of these goals. The Budget Document categorizes all tax -supported City services into these broad goals by each department's primary focus. Strong Neighborhoods are areas where all people can enjoy living, playing, and raising their families. A livable, vibrant, and desirable Fort Worth is the result of a collection of strong neighborhoods. It also encompasses a sense of pride, vision, identity, security, unity, and respect for the diversity of citizens and their views. The following departments are included in this section: ® Housing ® Human Relations Commission ® Planning • Parks & Community Services • Zoo ® Library A Sound Economy is an environment that provides the necessary resources to enhance the quality of life for the entire community. The following departments are included in this section: • Development • Transportation and Public Works • Public Events and Facilities A Safe Community is a place where people can be free of fear and threat to life, health, and property. The following departments are included in this section. • City Services • Police • Fire • Municipal Court • Public Health • Environmental Management The remaining General Fund departments offer support services that empower direct service providers to achieve the City's vision in a prudent and responsible manner. These departments include: • Mayor and City Council • City Manager's Office • Internal Audit • City Secretary • Law • Finance • Human Resources • Risk Management OTHER FUNDS The remaining sections are divided into the Debt Service Fund, Enterprise Funds, Internal Services Funds, and Special Funds. Enterprise Funds include: • Water and Sewer Fund • Solid Waste Management Fund • Municipal Golf Courses Fund • Municipal Parking Fund • Airports Fund D-5 Internal Service Funds include: ® Equipment Services Fund ® Information Systems Fund 0 Engineering Fund • Office Services Fund 0 Temporary Labor Fund Special Funds include: ® Property and Casualty Insurance Fund ® Workers' Compensation Fund ® Health and Life Insurance Fund ® Unemployment Compensation Fund ® Culture and Tourism Fund • Cable Communications Fund ® Lake Worth Trust Fund d Awarded Assets Funds ® Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District ® Environmental Management Fund ® City Store DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY PAGES Each departmental budget is comprised of different summary forms. Staffing levels, chain of command, and major functions are depicted through an organizational chart. The departmental budget summary form provides a description of departmental responsibilities and consolidation of departmental expenditures and staff levels. These resource allocations are provided for FY1998-99 actuals (audited), FY1999-00 Adopted Budget, and the FY2000-01 Adopted Budget. Expenditures are broken into four cost categories: personal services, supplies, contractual services, and capital outlays; when appropriate, debt service costs are also provided. The major policy issues faced in each organizational unit, those funded and included in the Adopted Budget, as well as those still unfunded, are described. The significant budget changes page provides a summary of major departmental expenditures and personnel changes from the FY1999-00 Adopted Budget to the FY2000-01 Adopted Budget. The departmental objectives and measures page explains the annual departmental objectives and provides program measures. The departmental summary by center form provides a summary of each departmental center's past, present, and future expenditure and personnel allocations. The departmental grant summary pages provide information on grants programs and the level of funds allocated for each program. The Budget Document is color -coded to allow the reader to reference specific pages more easily. The City Manager's Message and all other descriptive pages in the introductory section are printed on white unless otherwise noted in the following color coding chart. This chart indicates the page color for each type of recurring page in this document. D-6 PAGE TITLE PAGE COLOR Pie Charts Fund Summary Comparison of Expenditures Comparison of Revenues Departmental Budget Summary Significant Budget Changes Policy Issues Departmental Objectives and Measures Departmental Summary by Center Summary of Grant Programs Departmental Grant Summary White Gray Yellow Tan White Green Gray Gray Blue White Pink Finally, a glossary is included in the last section to assist the reader with unfamiliar terminology. D-7 The Fort Worth City Charter provides that on or before August 15 each year, the City Manager must submit to the City Council a proposed budget that provides a complete financial plan for all City funds and activities for the ensuing year. With this requirement in mind, the Budget Office establishes a budget schedule each year to enable the City Manager and his or her staff to prepare a proposed budget that will meet all provisions of the City Charter, and at the same time provide the City Council with a thorough, informative description of the level of municipal services being proposed and their costs. The budget prepared by the City staff includes proposed allocation levels for the next fiscal year and a projection of expenditures and revenues for the subsequent fiscal year. The City Council uses information provided in this proposed budget to facilitate its decision -making process and to aid it in charting a course of action for the approaching fiscal year. The City prepares a biennial budget, which reduces the amount of time involved in preparing the budget for the second year in the budget cycle and allows department personnel to shift their focus away from the task of budgeting toward activities more closely related to the primary goals and purposes of their departments. A biennial budget also encourages long-term planning and allows for easier transitions when program reductions and additions are necessary. As a preview to consideration of the proposed budget, the City Council is presented with the City's long -Range Financial Forecast. This document, which provides a projection of expenditures and revenues for the upcoming five years, gives the Council a big -picture framework and long-term context in which to make annual budget decisions. The forecast also serves to prepare the Council for any anticipated discrepancies between projected revenues and expenditures in future years. The forecast also reviews alternative financing strategies for Council to consider in balancing future budgets. The first step in the annual budget preparation process takes place in early March when the Budget Office distributes instructions and standard budget forms to departments, and the Information Technology Solutions Department opens the mainframe computer budget files up to the departments to input their requests. Departments prepare base budget requests to continue high priority current services within a specified target figure. Any new programs that a department wants considered for funding are submitted as improvement decision packages. These improvement requests are submitted in one prioritized list. The consequences of the failure to fund these items must also be provided. A departmental budget request is comprised of a line -item expenditure request that is supplemented with detailed justification. All requests for funding must be related to specific program needs and must be measurable in terms of effectiveness and/or indicators. This phase, referred to as departmental request phase, lasts until mid -April, when the budget files are closed and departments are required to submit their requests for the next fiscal year. The next phase of the budget process begins with the budget staff visiting with their assigned departments and carefully reviewing their requests, making adjustments as deemed appropriate. Throughout the spring and summer, the City Manager and City staff discuss the development of ii} the budget with the Council and begin to elicit policy direction from the Council, which further frames the proposed budget. The Budget Office then compiles the recommendations for each department, making some adjustments to recommendations as needed, and provides preliminary recommendations to the City Manager and staff. Final modifications are made, and the City Manager submits the proposed budget to the Council on or before August 15. The budget document is divided into separate sections for each of the City's funds, and each fund is subdivided into departments. Summaries are provided for the appropriate expenditures, revenues, and staffing for each fund on a historical, current, re -estimated, and proposed basis. These ranges of expenditures and staffing levels are also provided at the departmental level. Supplementary data are provided for each department, including a departmental summary that explains the primary purpose of the department and lists the expenditure and staffing data, an organization chart outlining the various functional divisions of the department, a summary of significant changes in departmental expenditure and staffing levels, policy issues that impact departmental operations, a listing of departmental objectives and corresponding program measures, and a summary of expenditure and staffing levels by cost center. The proposed budget document is supplemented with a book that contains copies of funded and unfunded improvement decision packages. These decision packages represent expanded or new programs requested by departments. These packages are reviewed as part of the budget process. The City Council is advised to use the decision package book as a means to evaluate various service levels within existing budget parameters. The decision packages are a modified zero -based approach to the budget process as they allow the Council to compare the needs of various City departments in a system -wide perspective with clear, programmatic consequences of funding decisions. Once the City Manager's Proposed Budget is presented to the City Council, the City Council phase begins. In this phase, the City Council holds a number of budget study sessions in which the departmental budgets are presented to Council Members for their review and input. These budget study sessions occur over a three to four week period. These study sessions result in the adoption of the budget at a City Council meeting in mid -September. The newly adopted budget becomes effective October 1. PHILOSOPHY On November 8, 1984, Fort Worth voters approved a number of amendments to the City Charter relating to the budget process. These amendments were substantially based on the budget section of the Model City Charter and replaced certain archaic elements of the old Charter that had not been modified since 1924. It is believed that these amendments facilitate the budget enactment and administration process. Included within these charter revisions were amendments that clarified and simplified the three types of appropriation transfers. At any time during the fiscal year, the City Manager may transfer part or all of any unencumbered appropriation balance among programs within a department, division, or section upon compliance with such conditions as City Council may establish by ordinance. Upon written request by the City Manager, the City Council may, by ordinance, transfer part or all of any unencumbered appropriation balance from one department to another. If at any time during the fiscal year the City Manager certifies that there are revenues in excess of those estimated in the m • budget that are available for appropriation, the City Council, by ordinance, may make supplemental appropriations for the year up to the amount of the excess. The City's budget system is designed to be consistent with its accounting system, the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this system, revenues are recognized when they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures in the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the fund liability is incurred within the current period. In accordance with its accounting system, the City of Fort Worth's budget process is composed of several elements, including line -item, program, and performance -based budgeting. In other words, departments submit line -item budgets identifying planned expenditures that are grouped together in the form of programs. The budget is broken down into program sections so that the cost of any given City program can easily be identified. Program enhancements are prioritized City-wide in order to dedicate the City's limited resources as effectively as possible. Performance measures have also been developed in an effort to link fund resources with desired and actual outcomes. Coordinating with the City's accounting system and Financial Management Policy Statements, refinements and modifications are made to the budget process each year so that Fort Worth will maintain a more effective budget system. D-11 SUGGESTED '-s1 FOR CONSIDERATION• 1 1 1 1 PR • '. Chief Appraiser certifies appraisal roll and submits it July 26, 2000 to the tax assessor (Sec. 26.01, Tax Code). II. Tax Assessor submits appraisal roll and anticipated By August 1, 2000 or collection rate to governing body (Sec. 26.04 (b), as soon thereafter as Tax Code). possible III. Designated officer or employee of taxing unit By August 6, 2000, calculates balances, and publicizes same; submits or as soon thereafter rate to governing body (Sec. 26.04 (d), (e), Tax as practicable Code). IV. City Manager submits proposed budget and budget Tuesday, August 8, message to the City Council on or before August 15 2000 (Chapter X, the effective tax rate and rollback tax rate, schedules and fund Sec. 1, City Charter). V. Proposed annual appropriations ordinance is Tuesday, August 8, passed by City Council on first reading, and ad 2000 valorem tax levy ordinance is introduced but not passed (Chapter X, Sec. 2, City Charter). VI. City Council holds first public hearing on Tuesday, August 8, appropriations ordinance and ad valorem tax levy 2000 ordinance and adopts resolution setting public hearing on proposed tax increase, if required. Hearing required if proposed tax levy exceeds last year's levy in total dollars. VII. City Secretary publishes appropriations ordinance After August 22, in official newspaper (Chapter X, Sec. 2, City 2000 Charter - at least 10 days must elapse from publication of notice to passage of appropriations ordinance on second reading). Publish "Notice of Public Hearing on Tax Increase". VIII. City Secretary publishes notice of August 29 public Before August 22, hearing on proposed tax increase (Sec. 26.06 (a), 2000 Tax Code - at least 7 days notice of hearing required). D-12 IX. City Council holds public hearing on appropriations Tuesday, August 29, ordinance and tax levy ordinance. 2000 X. City Council holds public hearing on proposed tax Tuesday, August 29, increase and adopts resolution announcing date, 2000 time and place of meeting where Council will vote on proposed tax increase (Sec. 26.05 (c) and Sec. 26.06 (d), (e), Tax Code). XI. City Secretary publishes notice of meeting where Thursday, August 31, City Council will vote on proposed tax increases 2000 (Sec. 26.06 (d), Tax Code - meeting must be held no sooner than three (3) but no later than fourteen (14) days after public hearing where time to vote on tax rate is set). XII. City Council votes on adoption of tax rate, adopts Tuesday, September ordinance setting tax rate (Sec. 26.06 (e), Tax 12, 2000 Code) and adopts appropriations ordinance on second reading. [Failure to act by the latter date requires re -publication of notice of meeting where City Council will vote on proposed tax increase (Sec. 26.06 (d))]. X111. City Secretary publishes appropriations ordinance As soon as possible once in official newspaper with schedule of changes after Tuesday, made by Council to City Manager's originally September 12, 2000 proposed budget and notifies Tax Assessor that tax rate has been adopted (Chapter X, Sec. 2, City Charter). If the proposed tax rate adopted by the City Council exceeds the rollback tax rate calculated under Sec. 26.04, 10% of the qualifi6d voters may petition for an election to reduce the tax rate to the rollback tax rate calculated under Sec. 26.04 (Sec. 26.07, Tax Code). XIV. On receipt of notice of the adopted tax rate, the Tax As soon as possible Assessor calculates the taxes on each property and after Tuesday, returns the roll to the City Council for approval (Sec. September 12, 2000. 26.09, Tax Code). XV. County Tax Assessor mails tax bills (Sec. 31.03, By October 1, 2000, or Tax Code). as soon thereafter as practicable. D-13 Reestimates, supplemental appropriations Ah All Depts policy�issues Budgets Office Long -Range )uncial Forecast ICity Council General b mg -range budgeting guideE3nes IIT Solutions ESD Billing rates, Dss access Vehicle list, service rates ( Budget 1 Office Finance Risk Minor equipment list, admin. service Management charges, TAD revenue projections Budget page templates, { budget insiruc ion manual, 14R 1 Insurance rates DBR, usS, Avenue➢BR, Obj. Mail PAYS, longevity, retirement, and sellback data All Depts Budget requests,pporting detail, decision aekages Budget I Analysis; requests foifurther information IAll Depts Responses to Bud�t Office requests IBudget Budge Office CM ] requests for further recomme _[ions to information 40 I CMO city M nager's Cannel requests for further propose budget inf, rmatian; wish list City Council d d d b C" Proposed bu get opte y rty Co u ail HR osilion Data Budget financial Data Adopted bu get figures Finance entered; budg is distributed All Depts Department Request Phase Analyst Recommendation Phase Proposed Budget Phase Budget Adoption Phase D-15 Any recent review of broad national economic trends presents a confusing mixture of economic messages. Despite ominous predictions and economic theories that claim that the national economy is in danger of overheating, it continues its unprecedented expansion. And unemployment to remain at record low levels without sparking the anticipated accompanying upward inflationary spiral. In part due to continued aggressive United States consumption, international markets — particularly those of Asia and Latin America - have recovered somewhat from the economic quagmire in which they were immersed last year at this time. However, those economies are not yet so recovered as to discount the threat they potentially pose to global economic stability. In such an uncertain and seemingly contradictory environment, it is important to remember that, although analysts` hold widely differing opinions of the timing and intensity, the majority would agree that the economy must eventually slow down. At the local level, at issue is the degree to which the City of Fort Worth, with proper planning and preparation, can mitigate the negative effects of that inevitable downturn. THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC CLIMATE The Asian Economy The region has rebounded to some degree from the economic turbulence it experienced during this same period last year. Nonetheless, it is not yet returned to any sort of safe level. Therefore, analysts remain cautious, particularly in light of recent surges in the value of the yen. Latin America Latin America is experiencing economic maladies similar, if less widespread, to those affecting Asian markets. If the problems in Brazil spread through the region, American exports could decline. Trade with Latin America is particularly important to Texas due to its proximity to Mexico and the volume of trade that has resulted from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It should also be noted that, barring any significant downward economic turns, the NAFTA partners are anticipated, in the long-term, to leverage their trade agreement into one encompassing all countries in North, Central, and South America. Such an enlarged trading bloc would have a significant national, state and local impact on the current trade, business and financial systems. t The European Union One year after the unification of 11 European countries under a pan-European currency, the Euro, the European Union is experiencing growing pains. Included among these growing pains are currency depreciation and economic stagnation, evidenced by continued high levels of unemployment. Underlying its current economic condition is the need for numerous, broad -based financial and other structural changes to enable it to better compete in a global economy. Growing pains notwithstanding, once the EU makes some of the necessary structural adjustments, it is likely to pose an economic challenge to the United States and its sphere of trading partners. While it is generally true that anything that fosters free trade — and ultimately growth — will be good for the world economy, detractors worry that the Euro could challenge the dominance of the U.S. dollar in world markets. The envisaged monetary challenge is important to U.S. businesses because the dollar's value affects trade and competition with foreign goods and services. Moreover, critics claim that an increasingly strong, unified EU threatens to dominate world trade markets. Workforce Composition The aging of the "Baby -Boom" generation will increasingly pose a threat to the stability of the world economy. The aging of that population, combined with decreased birth rates in developed nations, means that an increasingly reduced number of workers must support an increasing number of pensioners. According to The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, over the next 25 years in the developed world, while the number of persons of pensionable age will rise by 70 million, the working -aged population will increase by only 5 million. For a comparison, currently in the developed world, working taxpayers outnumber non -working retirees by three to one. While costs for child -related expenses will decrease with decreasing birth rates, the elderly consume approximately three times the resources currently dedicated to support the young, according to a report in U.S. News and World Report. In addition to the enormous economic strains support for the elderly population will place on the world's economy, fewer workers will likely translate into shrinking markets in large parts of the globe, declining gross domestic product. The scenario is obviously even worse for already taxed developing nations. As tax increases on an increasingly small workforce and service reductions are politically and otherwise unlikely, countries are likely to increasingly incur debt to support the older population, which could destabilize the world economy, D-17 THE NATIONAL ECONOMY Growth In spite of economic theory and analysts' predictions to the contrary, the United States is sustaining its current level of growth, while avoiding any significant increase in inflation. Although the Federal Reserve Board (the Fed) has implemented very small interest rate increases, it has yet to implement the expected significant increases to tighten the supply of money and prevent an anticipated, soaring inflationary cycle. In fact, a number of analysts believe, according to the March 4, 2000, Fort Worth Star -Telegram, that recent events, including the slight rise in the unemployment rate and stock market rebound, indicate that recent, small interest rate increases implemented by the Fed have been sufficient to curb any inflationary tendency. Other analysts, however, keep a wary eye on the Fed's actions, convinced that the slight unemployment rate increase is more a function of seasonal variation rather than of actual economic shift. Beyond inflationary considerations, the Congressional Budget Office's report The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2001-- 2010 depicts a very positive federal budgetary outlook based on it predictions of a continuing strong economy and resulting revenue increases and budgetary surpluses. CBO assumptions are predicated on assumptions of increased revenues, fueled by a strong economy and the resulting retirement of public debt, which frees up more resources to ease long-term budgetary pressures. In addition, it believes that additional available resources not committed to debt service lead to national savings, which promotes further economic growth. The further growth then makes it that much easier for government to meet its obligations. Distribution of Wealth On the downside of the economic picture, there is increasing disparity between the rich and poor members of society. A disproportionate number of the financial and other rewards in the "new" economy, go to workers in information -based industries, at the expense of those in previous stronghold industries, particularly those producing tangible goods and personal services. In fact, according to an October 1999 U.S. News and World Report article, the high-tech information economy is growing at approximately ten times the rate of the older industrial economy. The result is that an increasing percentage of the population works longer and harder in industries that no longer offer wages and promotions that enable them to achieve economic success or security. Concerns for this segment of the population are exacerbated by potential future reductions of Medicare and Social Security benefits. Stock Market Volatility Stock market analysts, by and large, continue to expect the worst; however, the "worst" has yet to materialize. There has been a good degree of market volatility; however, overall, it remains amazingly resilient. ■"11115B Continued Strong Consumer Confidence In general, in reaction to the existing scarcity of workers in the marketplace, U.S. workers are bringing home more in wages. The added wealth, along with low interest rates, further fuels consumer spending. According to the Wall Street Journal, the fact that consumer spending remains at high levels despite volatile stock markets indicates that consumer confidence is more directly related to employment prospects and rising wages than to stock market swings. Low Interest Rates Although it has implemented minor interest rate increases to tighten somewhat the flow of money, the Federal Reserve Board (the Fed) has yet to implement major interest rate hikes. Some analysts contend that, due to continued strong economic growth without the expected accompanying inflationary upward spiral and recent slight increases to the unemployment figure, that the Fed will not implement interest rate hikes to the anticipated degree. However, most analysts remain watchful of the Fed as growth continues and inflation fails to materialize to any significant degree. 6 a 4 0 c -2 Growth in U.S. Gross Domestic Product CD m � m CD CD 01 O� pi 01 Ql O] C? CD 6 C7 C7 Source: Texas Comptrolier's Office. 1999 is estimated. 2000-2004 are forecasts. D-19 THE STATE ECONOMY Economic growth continues statewide, the State Comptroller's Office expects that growth to be more modest than in the last few years (see graph below on changes in Gross State Product), Oil Prices Although the state economy has become more diversified since the last oil -induced recession, changes in oil prices still affect the Texas economy and employment rate. The petroleum -related market remains volatile. A year ago, when oil prices were low, workers in the oil production industry were experiencing lay-offs. Recent reports, however, indicate that oil prices are the highest they have been in nine years. Faced with such an unstable market, Texas must work to further diversify its economic base. Growth in Texas Gross State Product s IL c 6 C 2 c� m a a U N a 2 T - Source: Texas Comptrollers Office. 1999 is estimated. 2000-2004 are forecasts. THE LOCAL. ECONOMY The local economy remains strong. In fact, it has performed exceptionally well during the last few years, as demonstrated by City development activities, property value increases and sales tax revenue growth. However, experts continue to advise caution. Instead of unbridled expansion, they recommend careful planning to ensure accommodation of a growing population and business community, and the resulting increased service demands. iswc, Population Growth in the northern and southwestern sections of the City has created a significantly increased demand for City services, including police and fire protection, libraries, parks and streets. The following graph forecasts continued Fort Worth population growth. 520,000 470,000 420,000 370,000 Projected Population Growth in Fort Worth �- op w co O�) ca co 00 CO m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o 0 0 0 0 rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o 0 0 0 0 ➢ Growth in the 1980s slowed appreciably in FY1987 as the economy slumped. However, as evidenced by the above graph, it has since increased. ➢ It is anticipated that growth will increase in the forecast period, given the current expansionary market and the fact that Fort Worth has large tracts of empty land ready for development. Facilities Operation and Maintenance Costs Although the 1998 Capital Improvement Project (CIP) bond program addressed a number the growth -induced demands for service, ongoing new facilities maintenance and operation costs will continue to impact the City's annual operating budget. Operating and maintenance costs of new facilities constructed in response to current and anticipated growth are expected to consume an increasingly larger and more significant percentage of available resources. The following table identifies the annual costs to operate typical City facilities. NPD* $ 3,069,254 Fire Station $ 1,105,553 Branch Library $ 410,867 Community Center $ 267,113 Neighborhood Park $ 58,298 'The estimated cost, including salaries, of operating a Neighborhood Policing District combines resources provided by the General Fund with those provided by the Crime Control and Prevention District. D-21 Continued Strong Housing Market Housing starts remain strong both nationwide and in Texas. The following graph demonstrates the strength of the Fort Worth residential housing market. Single Family Housing Starts in Fort Worth 4,000 3,000 U) 3 v z 0 2,000 d z 1,000 0 Souroe: Development Department. ➢ Current growth attests to ongoing consumer confidence in the City of Fort Worth. 193WA The economic picture painted in the previous section has a direct impact on the City's ability to continue to generate revenue and provide services to its citizens. The future holds the same basic set of opportunities and challenges that the City has faced in recent years: a modestly growing tax base, a slow to moderately expanding economy and the problems of crime, community service needs and infrastructure deterioration. GENERAL FUN® REVENUES AND ExPEN®ITURES This section presents possible scenarios for the General Fund, after making some simplifying assumptions. The most important of these assumptions is that current programs will continue, and that none will be added. Expenditures for supplies, contractual services, and capital purchases are expected to increase at the rate of inflation, assumed to be about two percent throughout the forecast period. Personnel service increases can be attributed to the costs of proposed salary increases for civil service of six percent, step increases for non-exempt civilian employees, and a estimated increase for exempt civilian employees of approximately five percent. Each revenue account is forecast using the assumption that it will continue to follow the same pattern as the last few years, but with a small discount factor to account for potential unforeseen economic fluctuations. The table below presents a summary of the anticipated percentage increases in each revenue category. Revenue Changes 98-99 Actual 99-00 Re -Est 00-01 Forecast 01-02 Forecast 02-03 Forecast to to to to to 99-00 Re -Est 00-01 Forecast 01-02 Forecast 02-03 Forecast 03-04 Forecast Property Taxes 6.24% 3.53% 2.34% 2.20% 2.07% Sales Tax 7.07% 4.00% 4.00% 2.12% 1.06% Other Taxes 11.40% 11.95% 6.29% 3.89% 1.98% Licenses and Permits 1.40% 2.10% 1.62% 1.35% 0.87% Fines 1.68% 0.01 % 0.22% 0.25% 0.19% Use of Money 4.04% 1.91 % 2.49% 2.14% 1.35% From other Agency 2.11% 8.94% 9.38% 7.59% 4.46% Service Charges 4.72% -1.11% 0.00% 0.58% 1.06% Other Revenues -6.70% -3.61% 4.08% 7.35% 7.45% Transfers 6.31% 1.41% 0.17% -0.10% -0.04% Total 5.62% 3.25% 2.55% 1.98% 1.55% D-23 Operating Revenue vs. Expenditures Millions $ 380 360 340 - � Revs 320. Imo- Exps 300'--t 280 260 -_ 240� - «, -61 ILI" General Fund (Based on January Re -Estimates) 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $203,650,856 $217,883,448 $227,575,764 $235,503,684 $244,183,191 Supplies $11,773,451 .$12,008,920 $12,249,098 $12,494,080 $12,743,962 Contractual $59,786,665 $60,982,398 $62,202,046 $63,446,087 $64,715,009 Capital $2,120,807 $2,163,223 $2,206,488 $2,250,617 $2,295,630 Debt Service $45.989.907 $45.989,907 $45,989,907 $45.989,907 $45.989.907 TOTAL $323,321,686 $339,027,897 $350,223,303 $359,684,376 $369,927,699 REVENUES Property Taxes $157,404,185 $162,962,994 $166,769,413 $170,445,867 $173,979,892 Sales Tax $71,666,382 $74,533,037 $77,514,359 $79,157,821 $79,996,974 Other Taxes $9,698,965 $10,857,627 $11,540,270 $11,988,798 $12,226,300 Licenses and Permits $35,965,214 $36,722,255 $37,317,597 $37.821,979 $38,149,611 Fines $12,266,604 $12,267,838 $12,294,530 $12,325,137 $12,348,397 Use of Money $11,251,757 $11,466,709 $11,752,452 $12,004,416 $12,166,183 From other Agency $1,177,909 $1,283,166 $1,403,523 $1,510,119 $1,577,529 Service Charges $16,156,177 $15,976,745 $15,977,071 $16,069,258 $16,239,495 Other Revenues $909,074 $876,231 $912,004 $979,024 $1,051,966 Transfers $8.311,197 $8,428,275 $8.442,818 $8,434,596 $8.430,964 TOTAL $324,807,464 $335,374,878 $343,924,038 $350,737,014 $356,167,311 Use of Fund Balance $1,059,630 PROJECTED GAP $2,545,408 ($3,653,018) ($6,299,265) ($8,947,362) ($13,760,388) ➢ Because of the increased costs of implementing the step plan in FY1999-00, expenditures exceed revenues in the years beyond the current fiscal year. ➢ The step plan has automatic pay increases for non-exempt employees (trades and clerical classifications) and a merit pay matrix for exempt (professional) employee classes. The range is based on performance ratings and current pay quintile status. ➢ Salary increases come from estimates provided by the Human Resources Department in FY 2000-01. Increases beyond that are expected to grow at 2 percent a year. j At the end of each fiscal year, any General Fund budgetary surplus is added to reserves. The level of this fund balance shows the City's ability to survive such financial crises as revenue shortfalls, natural disasters or unplanned expenditures. In FY1997-93, the Council established a guideline to maintain General Fund reserves at 10 percent of the adopted budget. Council also decided to limit expenditures from reserves to projects that were of a Citywide nature, had minimal recurring costs, and could not be financed by other means. In FY1993-94, the Council amended this policy. If reserves exceed 10 percent, the excess will be designated for subsequent fiscal year capital expenditures or be transferred to the Capital Projects Reserve Fund. General Fund Balance as a Percent of Budget 20 15 10 5 0 , ro io ni eo eo rn --M— % of Total Budget T, - Target —0—% of O&M Budget f > For most of the past 15 years, the City has kept its fund balance level at or above the 10 percent goal. Past expenditure restraints have helped maintain and even increase reserves, allowing the City to use these reserves to fund emergency purchases without endangering its financial position. ➢ In FY1999-00, $1.06 million was budgeted from fund balance to balance the budget. Current estimates for expenditures and revenues for the year suggest that such a draw on fund balance will not be necessary, improving the fund position depicted in the graph. 9 However, significant funds will not be available in the future for emergency purchases if reserves are continuously utilized to balance the budget. 1934.7 TRENDS IN SOURCES OF REVENUES Analyzing trends in the composition of revenue demonstrates the City's ability to respond to economic changes, demands for services and revenue losses. Careful monitoring also enables staff to discern if the City is becoming too dependent on one revenue source. Property Taxes Property taxes provide the majority of the City's operating revenue. The property tax is based on assessed valuations, property tax rates and exemption policies. The City has no direct control over valuations since this service is performed by the Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD). The historical trend in appraised values appears below. Billions $ 20 15 10 5 0 �n cq - ca no Net Assessed Valuations — GCl CA 1r co co C; tl r3l 1- — .-n rn m - Prior to 1985, Assessed Value = 55% of Actual Value ➢ Net assessed valuations rose from FY1979-80 to FY1987-88. ➢ Economic stagnation in the late 1980s to mid-1990s — due to an economic slowdown and defense industry layoffs — forced the Council to adopt tax increases and service reductions to fund essential city services. ➢ The increases since FY1995-96 were welcome improvements. With the added resources, Council has been able to address needs for street maintenance, vehicle replacement, library services and employee salaries. ➢ At the same time Council has been able to lower the tax rate from 97.35 cents per $100 of assessed property value in FY1994-95 to 88.50 cents in FY1998-99, a decrease of 9.1 percent. Based on this analysis of the total assessed value in the city, staff forecasts the following changes for property tax revenues, assuming no change in the property tax rate. Trends and Forecast of Property Tax Revenues Millions $ 185 175 165 155 145 135 - 125 , ➢ Property tax revenues are expected to grow, even without increases in the tax rate. ➢ These increases are partly attributable to assumptions about population growth in Fort Worth (expected to grow at roughly 1 percent a year). These population increases will have a concomitant impact on demand for services. ➢ The increases also can be attributed to projected increases in the value of property in the city, as assessed by the Tarrant County Appraisal District. ➢ Property taxes are projected to increase 3.5 percent in FY2000-01, 2.3 percent in FY 2001-02, 2.2 percent in FY2002-03, and 2.1 percent in FY2003-04. ➢ This forecast is predicated on the assumptions that the economy will grow at a less robust rate than it has in the recent past, that population growth will continue at a modest rate, and that the pressure to hold down property tax rates will continue. D-27 The Sales Tax Unlike the property tax, the rate for which can be adjusted by the City Council, the sales tax rate is fixed at one percent of retail sales in the City of Fort Worth, minus state -defined exemptions. Periodically, the state changes these exemptions, which could affect revenues. For simplicity, however, no changes in exemptions are assumed. Historically, sales tax revenues have been significantly more unstable than property tax revenues. This is due in part to the fact that the City Council cannot adjust the tax rate to minimize year-to-year fluctuations, but also due to the volatile nature of consumer behavior, upon which this tax is based. Trends and Forecast of Sales Tax Revenues Millions $ 90 80 70 60 50 40 ...... 30 c7 �-.i rt �n � r— m .�, o v �•� -r ➢ Sales tax revenues comprises 22 percent of the General Fund budget. This proportion is expected to remain relatively stable over the forecast period. ➢ Consumer confidence remains high, driving increased consumption and sales tax revenues. ➢ However, revenues in this category are expected to grow less vigorously in the future as the robust economy cools slightly. ➢ Thus, this revenue is expected to increase 4 percent in FY2000-01, 4 percent in FY2001-02, 2.1 percent in FY2002-03, and 1.1 percent FY2003-04. ➢ One potential unknown factor that could impact this revenue is internet retail sales. Internet sales currently are not taxable. Erosion of the taxable retail sales base due to increases in internet retail sales could significantly impact the resources available to provide services in Fort Worth. Other Major Revenue Sources Aside from the property and sales taxes assessed by the City, several other sources of revenue are also available. Licenses and Permits comprise the largest portion of these other categories, which include franchise fees (including franchise fees from several communication companies, but excluding Southwestern Bell), permits to operate various businesses, parking meter usage, and various occupational licenses. Other Local Taxes primarily reflect franchise fee revenue from Southwestern Bell. Charges for Services capture areas in which the City is able to assign fees to specific users. The Miscellaneous Revenue category aggregates all other sources, ranging from intergovernmental transfers to fines and forfeitures. Trends and Forecasts in Other Sources of Revenue Millions $ 40 - --- - 30 20 90 0 3� P A. A Licenses and Permits Other Local Taxes 1 , , � I iTi • =1 � -1 1 —ice--Charges for Service j *Mist. Revenues ➢ A general upward trend exists for each of these categories. ➢ As the population and economy increases, these categories are expected to continue to rise. D-29 Revenues per Capita This indicator compares net operating revenues (total revenues less transfers from reserves) with population. It is measured in current and real dollars (adjusted for the effects of inflation on purchasing power). A positive trend indicates expansion of the tax base, tax increases, or both. A negative trend points to economic contraction. Net Operating Revenue Per Capita Millions $ 800 600 400 200 , p N M LO CO 7+ W M 0WW0GWMM N M � U"J W A W M O r N M m W m Q7 E� O) tl7 Q7 O'7 Q) O1 m M O O O CD O r r rm r +- .-- *^ r r r r r r r r r r r r N N " N N Current$ --- -Real$ ➢ Over the past 18 years, current revenues have demonstrated generally positive trends while real revenues per capita have been relatively stable. ➢ Since 1980, the statistic has risen from $247 in current dollars to $631. Adjusted for inflation, it has risen over this time from $301 to $374, or 24 percent, much less than the 72 percent increase in real gross domestic product over the same period. ➢ Since the forecast assumes no change in the tax and fee structure, real revenues per capita are projected to remain relatively flat over the next five years. D-30 Analysis of trends in the composition of the budget provides a snapshot of the community's priorities and Council's decisions. Below, the adopted budgets for debt service and five departments are compared. Budget Growth Areas 100 80 M 40 20 - G�.,. 171 rn c, Debt Police ®O--Fire TPW Parks --O-Library ➢ Debt payments have fallen over the last several years as the City has paid off large portions of its obligations and restricted new debt issuance. However, this trend could change, depending on decisions by the City Council on a number of large capital projects currently under consideration (see Debt Trends section for additional discussion of this issue, page 45). ➢ Since FY 1990, the Library budget has grown the most, followed by the Police and Fire departments. The budgets of the Transportation and Public Works (TPW) and Parks and Community Services departments have grown less, as the table below shows. (millions $) PY1989-90 FY1999-00 Change Library $6.80 $10.90 60.29% Police $56.60 $87.10 53.89% Fire $36.30 $55.60 53.17% TPW $24.80 $30.20 21.77% PACS $14.30 $16,40 14.69% " Police expenditures exclude Crime Control and Prevention District spending. ➢ FY1999-00 figures are based on January re -estimates. All other figures are based on figures reported in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. D-31 Expenditures per Capita This indicator compares changes in expenditures to changes in population in current and real terms. An increase in expenditures per capita may mean citizens are receiving more services. On the other hand, if service levels are constant, an increase may mean productivity has declined. Decreases in the measure signify a growing population and static, or declining, services. Without adjusting for inflation, expenditures per capita appear to have steadily risen since FY1979-80. But in real dollars, the measure has been falling since FY1986-87. This is mainly due to expenditure restraint. While expenditures have risen, they have not risen enough to keep pace with inflation and population growth. Expenditures per Capita $700 . $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 . . . 1 > ,�, �S 1, "1 I t_ - UCJ UJ (F.] Li iT tT� 7 � - - �}. -� �Jl rl-� �J- --(>--Current $ —CJ-- Rea! $ Generally, the more a city spends in real dollars, the more services its citizens receive. The graph indicates that services per capita have been generally stable over the last few years, but declined substantially in the late 1980s and early 1990s. ➢ Severe budgetary constraints during the economic downturn forced the City to spread existing services across an increasing population base. ➢ More recently, however, the City has been able to stem that tide and has maintained stable service levels relative to the population growth. D-32 The amount of principal and interest a city must pay each year on its debt is defined as its debt service. As debt rises, debt service payments increase, decreasing resources available for current operations and services. To track this potential, the City measures the ratio of debt service to net operating revenue. A range of 10 to 20 percent is acceptable. Percent Debt Service as a Percent of Net Operating Revenues 30 27 - 24 - 21- 18- 15- 12- 9 k •1 1 1 1 1 1 • 00 6] CDN f+') f �f] •9 !� 00 a1 p N K] C•D !b tb Oa aU 00 OO tb c0 00 01 4• CJ� Cn Q� Cf• O� O p O p O rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn a o 0 o a o � .-- � --0— Debt Service Target Maximum ➢ This graph demonstrates the City's efforts to decrease debt service as a percent of net operating revenues toward the lower end of the acceptable range. As a result, an increasing percentage of current revenue is available to provide current services. ➢ In 1992, the City took advantage of low interest rates to refinance a large portion of its general obligation debt. ➢ Although voters approved additional bond sales for street improvements in 1993, total requirements began to fall in 1997 as the City began retiring large portions of its debt. ➢ Voters approved a $120 million bond program in 1998. Because of the City's schedule to pay down its debt, this bond program will not significantly impact the City's debt load. D-33 LONG-TERM DEBT AS A PERCENT OF ASSESSED VALUATION Long-term debt should equal five percent or less of assessed valuation. Staying at or below this benchmark means that a municipality is not exceeding its ability to pay. Long -Term Debt as a Percent of Assessed Valuation Percent 4. CK 2r 1 w �m va cn ID o cr rn rn s m z> m rn o 0 ➢ During the past decade, the City has kept its long-term debt below the recommended level. ➢ Major developments in the northern and southern parts of the city and the need to repair existing infrastructure will require more bond funds in the coming years. However, due to the City's current policy of rapid debt repayment, total debt as a percentage of assessed valuation will continue to decline to historic lows over the next 25 years. IRIIc11I LONG-TERM DEBT PER CAPITA This statistic measures the debt burden per citizen. A rising number indicates that the governmental entity is assuming more debt obligations for its citizens. A falling number may indicate either a declining amount of outstanding debt or a rising population or both. Long -Term Debt Per Capita $200 , 1-1 cn cri cu ra co — _ ',�, �T «-, ,�, a, Existing Debt Projected Debt ➢ In Fort Worth, outstanding long-term debt per capita rose dramatically from 1980 to 1986. This period corresponds to the assumption of large amounts of debt to fund street improvements and new facilities, including libraries, parks and fire stations. ➢ It began to fall in 1994 as the City retired large amounts of its bonds. City policy has been to adopt aggressive maturity schedules for its debt to help reduce its interest payments and maintain fiscal stability. ➢ As the graph shows, even with the assumption of new debt as approved in the 1998 bond package, the figure will remain well below its highs of the early 1990's as the City retires large amounts of pre-existing debt. ➢ With the assumption of debt related to the 1998 bond package, debt service per capita will average $425 between FY1999-00 and FY2003-04. ➢ If the City did not spend any of the 1998 voter -approved CIP funds and thus issued no new bonds, debt service per capita would fall from $578 in FY1999-00 to $288 in FY2003-04. D-35 OVERLAPPING DEBT AS A PERCENT OF ASSESSED VALUATION In Fort Worth, 99 entities can issue debt against their tax bases. Besides the City of Fort Worth, all area school districts, the hospital district and Tarrant County are among those governmental entities that can issue debt on behalf of their citizens. The ratio of overlapping debt to assessed valuation measures a community's ability to repay all the debt owed by all these overlapping entities. Overlapping Debt as a Percent of Assessed Valuation Percent 4. 3 2- 1 0 1 CD CN M u7 10 I� 0.7 O� O CV M �' tf7 CO I� 4:7 00 M co co 00 co a0 a0 a0 O] M M O) M M a, Ot O) Ol O] O? Ol Ql 21 6] On 6] O? 6] O] �n O) O) 02 Ol Ch ➢ In recent years, the ratio has risen, but it has not -reached its peak of FYI 979-80. This indicates that debt in the community has not grown as fast as assessed valuation. ➢ Those entities with the largest debt that overlaps the City's include the Fort Worth Independent School District, the Keller Independent School District, and Tarrant County. ➢ Fort Worth voters recently approved a $400 million bond program for the Fort Worth Independent School District. As a result, this percentage is likely to change in coming years as the new debt is issued. ➢ The City's intention to issue additional debt in the future must be considered in the context of all other jurisdictions' debts. The tax base's ability to support additional debt must be carefully evaluated. E-1 ORDINANCE NO. 14286 AN ORDINANCE SETTING FORTH AN ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF THE EXPENSE OF CONDUCTING EACH DEPARTMENT, DIVISION AND OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH FOR THE ENSUING FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2000, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001, AND APPROPRIATING MONEY FOR THE VARIOUS FUNDS AND PURPOSES OF SUCH ESTIMATE; APPROPRIATING MONEY TO PAY INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL SINKING FUND REQUIREMENT ON ALL OUTSTANDING GENERAL INDEBTEDNESS; PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS UPON THIS ORDINANCE BEFORE THE ENTIRE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE; AND PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND APPROPRIATIONS IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND FOR THE PUBLICATION AND FINAL PASSAGE THEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the appropriation for the ensuing fiscal year beginning October 1, 2000, and ending September 30, 2001, for the different departments and purposes of the City of Fort Worth be fixed and determined as follows: I. GENERAL FUND 1. Mayor and City Council 2. City Manager 3. Housing 4. Development 5, Human Relations Commission 6. Internal Audit 7. City Secretary 8. Law -1- $761, 507 4,801,578 57,799 5,086,642 306,026 868,616 495,084 3,251,726 E-2 9. Finance 4,980,001 10. Human Resources 2,948,431 11. Risk Management 1,035,307 12. Transportation and Public Works 30,684,776 13. City Services 5,337,093 14. Planning 1,372,586 15. Public Events 8,355,487 16. Police 92,807,206 17. Fire 58, 568, 555 18. Municipal Court 8,888,713 19. Public Health 6,129,931 20. Environmental Management 1,335,172 21. Parks and Community Services 18,521,318 22. Zoo 2,838,609 23. Library 12,357,170 24. Non -Departmental 25,637,304 25. Debt Service 46,930,973 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $344,357,610 TI. CIVIL SERVICE STAFFING Police Department: Civil service staffing for the Police Department on October 1, 2000 will consist of 1,216 authorized positions as follows: 841 officers, 183 detectives, 129 sergeants, 46 lieutenants, 12 captains and 5 deputy chiefs. -2- �C3 Fire Department: t Civil service staffing for the Fire Department on October 1, 2000, will consist of 745 authorized positions as follows: 355 firefighters, 176 engineers, 109 lieutenants, 79 captains, 23 battalion chiefs and 3 deputy chiefs. III. CULTURE AND TOURISM FUND The Culture and Tourism Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax and other sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of Culture and Tourism Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Culture and Tourism Fund appropriation of $7, 919, 566. IV. TEMPORARY LABOR FUND The Temporary Labor Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the in-house charges to City departments for the provision of temporary labor and other such sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Temporary Labor Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Temporary Labor Fund appropriation of $894,939. V. MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND The Municipal Golf Course Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the Pecan Valley, Rockwood, Z. Boaz, Meadowbrook and Sycamore Creek Golf Courses and other sources as -3- E-4 shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Municipal Golf Course Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Municipal Golf Course Fund appropriation of $5,767,929. VI. AIRPORTS FUND The Airports Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the various sources included in the budget of the City Manager, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Airports Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Airports Fund appropriation of $3,084,972. VII. WATER AND SEWER FUND The Water and Sewer Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the sale of water, sewer services and other sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Water and Sewer Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total appropriation for the Water and Sewer Fund of $202,662,561. VIII. MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES FUND The Municipal Parking Facilities Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from commercial off-street parking to employees and citizens and commercial office space leases in the Municipal Parking Garage and other sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Municipal Parking Facilities Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total WE E-5 Municipal Parking Facilities Fund appropriation of $258,258. IX. OFFICE SERVICES FUND The Office Services Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the in --house charges to City departments for the provision of microfilming and office copying services, printing and graphics services, plus other in-house functions such as the messenger and mail services, and other sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Office Services Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Office Services Fund appropriation of $2,027,620. X. EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND The Equipment Services Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from charges for the performance of maintenance and operations functions at the City's six service centers plus on -site maintenance work performed at the City's landfills, and other sources as shown by other ordinances hereto- fore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Equipment Services Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Equipment Services Fund appropriation of $12,382,479. XI. SOLID WASTE FUND The Solid Waste Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the collection of municipal solid waste and -5- E-6 other sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total appropriation for the Solid Waste Fund of $23,227,496. XII. INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND The Information Systems Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from in-house transfers from City depart- ments for the provision of basic telephone line service, mainte- nance of telephone lines and instruments, lease/purchase of telephone instruments and other equipment, support in the operation and maintenance of personal computers, design, fabrication, procurement, installation and maintenance of electronic equipment, maintenance of the trunk system and other sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Information Systems Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which. includes a total Information Systems, Fund appropriation of $12,504,653. XIII. LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND The Lake Worth Trust Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from sales and leases of Lake Worth properties and other sources as shown in the budget of the City Manager, and such money shall be used to meet requirements of the Lake Worth Trust Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Lake Worth Trust Fund appropriation of $776,416. E-7 XIV. CABLE COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE The Cable Communications Office shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the various sources included in the budget of the City Manager, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Cable Communications Office as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Cable Communications Office appropriation of $875,875. XV. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE The Property and Casualty Insurance Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the City contributions from each operating fund and from the various sources included in the budget of the City Manager, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Property and Casualty Insurance Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Property and Casualty Insurance Fund appropriation of $5, 066, 844. XVI. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND The Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the City contributions from each operating department and from the various sources included.in the budget of the City Manager, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund appropriation of $10,104,930. -7- Em XVII. HEALTH INSURANCE FUND The Health Insurance Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the City contributions from each operating department, from contributions from employees and retirees, and from the various sources included in the budget of the City Manager, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Health Insurance Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Health Insurance Fund appropriation of $28,461,953. XVIII. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND The Unemployment Compensation Insurance Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the City contributions from each operating department and from the various sources included in the budget of the City Manager, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Unemployment Compensation Insurance Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Unemployment Compensation Insurance Fund appropriation of $350,000. XIX. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FUND The Engineering Department Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the in-house charges to City departments for the provision of engineering services and other such sources as shown by other ordinances heretofore passed, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of that department as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which we includes a total Engineering Department Fund appropriation of $9, 261, 400. XX. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND The Environmental Management Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the City's environmental protection 'fee and other such sources as may become available from environmental projects, and such money shall be used to meet the requirements of the Environmental Management Fund as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes, a total Environmental Management Fund appropriation of $2,960,596. XXI. FEDERAL AWARDED ASSETS FUND The Federal Awarded Assets Fund shall be provided with such revenue, as may be secured by the Police Department under federal law authorizing the forfeiture of certain property involved in the commission of criminal offenses, and such money shall be used for law enforcement purposes in accordance with the restrictions in such forfeiture law, and as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Federal Awarded Assets Fund appropriation of $395,538. XXII. STATE AWARDED ASSETS FUND The State Awarded Assets Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured by the Police Department under state law authorizing the forfeiture of certain property involved in the commission of criminal offenses, and such money shall be used for law enforcement purposes in accordance with the restrictions in E- 10 such forfeiture law, and as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total State Awarded Assets Fund appropriation of $289,435. XXIII. CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND The Crime Control and Prevention District Fund shall be provided with such revenue as shall be appropriated to same by the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District in accordance with law, and such money shall be used as provided for by law and the purposes specified by the Fort Worth Crime Control and Prevention District, and as provided in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total Crime Control and Prevention District Fund appropriation of $37,210,029. XXIV. CITY STORE FUND The City Store Fund shall be provided with such revenue as may be secured from the sale of merchandise at the City Store as shown in the budget of the City Manager, which includes a total City Store Fund appropriation of $112,210. SECTION 2. That the distribution and division of the above named appropriations be made in accordance with the budget of expenditures submitted by the City Manager and as revised by the City Council in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter and adopted by the City Council., which budget is made a part of this ordinance by reference thereto and shall be considered in connection with the expenditures of the above appropriations. -10 E-11 SECTION 3. That on Tuesday, August 8, 2000, the City Manager presented to the City Council his budget estimate; that the City Council of the City of Fort. Worth shall sit as a committee of the whole in the Council Chamber at the City Hall in the City of Fort Worth on the 8th day of August, A.D. 2000, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., to hear any complaints, suggestions or observations that any citizen, taxpayer or party interested may desire to make with reference to any or all of the provisions of this ordinance; and that such committee shall continue its deliberations from time to time and day to day until the public has been given a full opportunity to be heard. SECTION 4. That following the commencement of the public hearings for which provision has been made in the preceding section, this ordinance shall be published two times, one of which publications shall not be less than ten (10) days before the second reading and final passage of the ordinance, in the official newspaper of the City of Fort Worth, which newspaper is one of general circulation in said City. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall not be presented for final passage until ten (10) full days have elapsed after its publication, as provided by the Charter of said City. -11- E-12 SECTION 6. That should any part, portion, section or part of a section of this ordinance be declared invalid or inoperative or void for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision, opinion or judgment shall in no way affect the remaining portions, parts, sections or parts of sections of this ordinance, which provisions shall be, remain and continue to be in full force and effect. SECTION 7. That all ordinances and appropriations for which provisions have heretofore been made are hereby expressly repealed if in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 8. That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and publication as required by the Charter of the City of Fort Worth, and it is so ordained. AP OVER AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorne Date: • 9-/';�-- 00 ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: �j -12- E-13 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF AN ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX ON ALL PROPERTY, REAL, PERSONAL AND MIXED, SITUATED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, AND ALL PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED IN SAID CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, ON THE FIRST DAY OF JANUARY, A.D. 2000, EXCEPT SUCH PROPERTY AS MAY BE EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS: SECTION I. There is hereby levied, adopted and shall be collected by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, as provided by law, an annual ad valorem tax for the year 2000, at the rate of $0.8750 on every one hundred dollar ($100.00) valuation on all property, real, personal and mixed, situated in, and all personal property owned in, the City of Fort Worth, Texas, on the first day of January, A.D. 2000, liable under the law to taxation and not exempt therefrom by the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas. The ad valorem tax rate is divided into a maintenance and operation levy of $0.6312 for general fund operations and a debt levy of $0.2438 for servicing outstanding debt obligations. SECTION Il. The debt portion of the tax levy which is hereinbefore made is to provide for the payment of interest and to create a redemption fund to discharge and pay principal and interest on any general obligations due or owing by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and shall not be taken as an addition to levies for the same purpose in the respective ordinances authorizing and creating such E-14 obligations, but 'the levy hereinbefore made is made pursuant to and .for the purpose of carrying out and complying with, the provisions of said prior ordinances. The Chief Accounting Officer shall pay each week to the General Debt Service Fund twenty-seven and eighty six hundredths percent (27.86a) of the current taxes collected. SECTION III. The taxes provided for herein are levied upon all taxable property, real, personal and mixed, situated in, and all personal property owned in, the City of Fort Worth, Texas, as assessed, valued and described in the assessment tax rolls and the tax books of the City of 'Fort Worth, Texas, for the year 2000, and any supplemental assessments thereof, as the same have been or shall be presented to the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by the Assessor and Collector of Taxes of said City of Fort Worth, Texas. SECTION IV. The taxes provided for herein are due on receipt of a tax bill and are delinquent if not paid before February 1, 2001. Failure to send or receive the tax bill shall not, however, affect the validity of the taxes, penalty or interest herein imposed, the due date, the existence of a tax lien, or any procedure instituted to collect such taxes, penalty or interest. -2- E-15 SECTION V. If a person pays one --half of the taxes required to be paid.by virtue of this Ordinance before December 1, 2000, he may pay the remaining one-half of such taxes without penalty or interest at any time before July 1, 2001. SECTION VI. (a) A delinquent tax incurs a penalty of six percent (6%) of the amount of the tax for the first calendar month it is delinquent plus one percent (1%) for each additional month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid prior to July 1, 2001. However, a tax delinquent on July 1, 2001, incurs a total penalty of twelve percent (12%) of the amount of the delinquent tax without regard to the number of months the tax has been delinquent. (b) If a person who exercises the split payment option provided by Section V above fails to make the second payment before July 1, 2001, the second payment is delinquent and incurs a penalty of twelve (12) percent of the amount of the unpaid tax. SECTION VII. In addition to the penalty set out above, a delinquent tax accrues interest at a rate of one percent (1 %) for each month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid. Said interest of one percent (1%) per month shall be added to said taxes in the event the payment thereof shall become delinquent as above set forth, and said interest shall attach on the first day of each month thereafter until the taxes shall have been paid, which interest -3- E-16 and the penalty provided for above shall be and become a part of said taxes and be payable as such. SECTION VIII. A tax delinquent on July 1, 2001, incurs an additional penalty of fifteen percent (150) of the amount of the delinquent tax, penalty and interest to defray costs of collection. Such fifteen percent (150) penalty is imposed pursuant to Sections 6.30 and 33.07 of the Property Tax Code and is in addition to the other penalties and interest which are due and owing according to law. SECTION IX. A tax that becomes delinquent on or after June 1 under Section 31.03, 31.031, 31.032, or 31.04 of the Tax Code shall incur an additional penalty of 15 percent of the amount of taxes, penalty, and interest due, to defray costs of collection, pursuant to Section 33.08 of the Tax Code. Such additional penalty is in addition to the other penalties and interest which are due and owing according to law. SECTION X. Such taxes, penalty and interest shall be and become a lien upon the property on which the taxes are levied, as prescribed by the Charter of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the laws of the State of Texas, and such lien shall be and is hereby made a paramount, first and superior lien to all other liens whatsoever on the property on which said taxes are levied. -4- E-1 7 SECTION XI. Should any part, portion, section or part of a section of this ordinance be declared invalid or inoperative or void for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision, opinion or judgment shall in no way affect the remaining portions, parts, sections or parts of sections of this ordinance, which provision shall be, remain and continue to be in full force and effect. SECTION XII. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage as provided by law. ,. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: /�2-00 ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE:"��� oU -5- E-19 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO THE CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSED 2000-01 BUDGET Explanation of Revenue Changes; Original General Fund Revenue Estimate $343,863,978 SALES TAX $168,632 Original Estimate $ 75,408,483 Revised Estimate $ 75,577,115 This increase of $168,632 is due to additional sales tax revenue expected in FY2000-01 based on current -year re -estimates. LICENSES & PERMITS $125,000 Original Estimate $ 36,988,631 Revised Estimate $ 37,113,631 This increase of $125,000 is due to improved projections for collection of General Fines in Municipal Court based on current -year re -estimates. USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY $200,000 Original Estimate $ 11,744,764 Revised Estimate $ 11,944,764 This increase of $200,000 is based on higher current -year re -estimates for interest earnings on investments. REVISED GENERAL FUND REVENUE TOTAL $344,357,610 E-20 Explanation of Appropriation Changes; Original General Fund Appropriation $343,863,978 MAYOR & COUNCIL $64,323 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 697,184 Budget Approved by City Council $ 761,507 An increase of $5,364 for salary increases is included. An increase of $58,959 is included for Council aide compensation increases. CITY MANAGER $182,846 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 4,618,732 Budget Approved by City Council $ 4,801,578 This increase will fond salary increases for departmental employees. DEVELOPMENT $58,058 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 5,028,584 Budget Approved by City Council $ 5,086,642 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION $16,007 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 290,019 Budget Approved by City Council $ 306,026 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. INTERNAL AUDIT $35,996 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 832,620 Budget Approved by City Council $ 868,616 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. CITY SECRETARY $11,399 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 483,685 Budget Approved by City Council $ 495,084 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. E-21 LAW $245,626 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 3,006,100 Budget Approved by City Council $ 3,251,726 An increase of $171,070 for salary increases is included. An increase of $74,556 is included for furniture and office modernization. FINANCE $146,967 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 4,833,034 Budget Approved by City Council $ 4,980,001 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. HUMAN RESOURCES $120,808 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 2,827,623 Budget Approved by City Council $ 2,948,431 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. RISK MANAGEMENT $42,541 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 992,766 Budget Approved by City Council $ 1,035,307 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC WORKS $653,848 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 30,030,928 Budget Approved by City Council $ 30,684,776 An increase of $553,848 for salary increases is included. An increase of $100,000 is also included for installation of speed humps at approved locations throughout the city. CITY SERVICES $110,123 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 5,226,970 Budget Approved by City Council $ 5,337,093 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. PLANNING $46,550 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 1,326,036 Budget Approved by City Council $ 1,372,586 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. E-22 PUBLIC EVENTS $107,073 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 8,248,414 Budget Approved by City Council $ 8,355,487 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. POLICE $3,646,498 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 89,160,708 Budget Approved by City Council $ 92,807,206 An increase of $476,554 is included for non -civil service employee salary increases. An increase of $3,169,944 is also included for civil service employee salary increases. FIRE $2,519,966 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 56,048,589 Budget Approved by City Council $ 58,568,555 An increase of $52,166 is included for non -civil service employee salary increases. An increase of $2,467,800 is also included for civil service employee salary increases. MUNICIPAL COURT $108,539 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 8,780,174 Budget Approved by City Council $ 8,888,713 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. PUBLIC HEALTH $117,940 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 6,011,991 Budget Approved by City Council $ 6,129,931 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT $53,719 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 1,281,453 Budget Approved by City Council $ 1,335,172 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. E-23 PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES $416,358 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 18,104,960 Budget Approved by City Council $ 18,521,318 An increase of $376,358 is included for salary increases. An increase of $40,000 is also included for Botanic Garden improvements. LIBRARY $380,291 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 11,976,879 Budget Approved by City Council $ 12,357,170 An increase of $339,991 is included for salary increases. An increase of $40,300 is also included for installation of fire and intrusion alarms. NON-DEPARTMENTAL-$8,591,844 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 81,160,121 Budget Approved by City Council $ 72,568,277 A decrease of $8,771,661 is included to reflect the redistribution of projected salary increases across each General Fund departmental budget. An increase of $179,817 is also included for the following purposes: $68,817 increase for the Historic Preservation Research Project, $30,000 increase for the Neighborhood Arts Council, $60,000 increase for Sister Cities core operating expenses, $41,000 increase for Tarrant County Challenge Inc., $20,000 decrease for the D/FW Regional Film Commission, $5,000 increase for the Veteran's Day Parade, and $5,000 decrease for Mayors United on Safety, Crime, and Law Enforcement (MUSCLE) membership fees. REVISED GENERAL FUND TOTAL $344,357,610 NET CHANGE FROM CITY MANAGER'S PROPOSED BUDGET $493,632 ENTERPRISE AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUND CHANGES MUNICIPAL GOLF $79,588 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 5,688,341 Budget Approved by City Council $ 5,767,929 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. E-24 MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES $5,156 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 253,102 Budget Approved by City Council $ 258,258 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. AIRPORTS $50,371 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 3,034,601 Budget Approved by City Council $ 3,084,972 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. WATER AND SEWER $742,042 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 201,920,519 Budget Approved by City Council $ 202,662,561 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. SOLID WASTE $48 689 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 23,178,807 Budget Approved by City Council $ 23,227,496 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. ENGINEERING $212,446 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 9,048,954 Budget Approved by City Council $ 9,261,400 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. OFFICE SERVICES $3,870 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 2,023,750 Budget Approved by City Council $ 2,027,620 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. TEMPORARY LABOR $3 992 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 890,947 Budget Approved by City Council $ 894,939 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. E-25 EQUIPMENT SERVICES $410,340 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 11,972,139 Budget Approved by City Council $ 12,382,479 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. IT SOLUTIONS $363,678 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 12,140,975 Budget Approved by City Council $ 12,504,653 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. SPECIAL FUN® CHANGES ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT $70,672 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 2,889,924 Budget Approved by City Council $ 2,960,596 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. CABLE $25,867 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 850,008 Budget Approved by City Council $ 875,875 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. CITY STORE $848 Original Proposed Appropriation $ 111,362 Budget Approved by City Council $ 112,210 This increase will fund salary increases for departmental employees. E-27 The FY2000-01 Adopted General Fund budget is based on a $20,504,232 increase in expenditures, a 6.3 percent increase from the FY1999-00 adopted budget. Major expenditure adjustments are as follows; $10,0'17,763 57.2 AP Increase in funds for salaries for the 2000-01 fiscal year for regular and civil service employees. ($1,607,205) Decrease in funds for workers' compensation. $1,328,125 Increase in funds for employee retirement insurance. $1,205,873 Increase in funds for group health. $1,161,836 Increase in funds for transfer payments. $1,135,622 Increase in funds for contributions to employee retirement. $908,435 Increase in funds for other contractual services. $629,425 Increase in funds for Information Technology (IT) Solutions Department charges. $547,614 Increase in funds for scheduled temporaries. $484,332 Increase in funds for minor equipment. $472,937 Increase in funds for lease purchases. $364,322 Increase in funds for civil service retirement contributions. $363,900 Increase in funds for buildings. $328,510 Increase in funds for radio. system charges. $302,569 Increase in funds for civil service overtime. $294,252 Increase in funds for medicare. $288,525 Increase in funds for litigation expenses. ($278,776) Decrease in funds for inside repair and maintenance. $273,152 Increase in funds for library materials. $271,506 Increase in funds for telephone services. $269,000 Increase in funds for sidewalk program. $260,236 Increase in funds for operating supplies. ($213,487) Decrease in funds for IT Solutions Department services. ($201,000) Decrease in funds for motor vehicle purchases. $200,000 Increase in funds for speed hump program. AW ($188,790) Decrease in funds for unemployment compensation. $186,329 Increase in funds for shift differential. $180,820 Increase in funds for dues and memberships. $156,695 Increase in funds for motor vehicle repair. $108,188 Increase in funds for equipment services charges. $100,000 Increase in funds for city mowing. Mayor and Council The adopted Mayor and Council budget is $761,507, which is an 18.93 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. An increase of $7,640 is included for additional leased computers as part of the lease exchange program. The department's budget also increased by $6,079 to meet the Information Technology Solutions Department's schedule of rates for FY2000-01. An additional $6,000 was included in the operating supplies account and $3,100 was added to the machinery and equipment account in order for the department to meet actual budgetary expenditures in the upcoming fiscal year. City Manaqer's Office The adopted City Manager's Office budget is $4,801,578, a 10.20 percent increase over the FY1999- 00 adopted budget. The adopted budget includes $80,349 for the addition of the neighborhood capacity coordinator, which was previously funded by grant funds. The budget also includes $57,852 for the addition of a position to address the City's need for a day laborer center, In addition, the adopted budget is decreased by $73,729 because the Utility Manager position was transferred to the Environmental Management Department. In the Public Information Division, a position is added to manage the City's website content, at a cost of $56,320. Department -wide, an increase of $108,651 is included for salaries, which reflects the implementation of the City's new compensation plan. It also includes an addition of $86,748 for computer leases because all divisions in CMO will be on the lease exchange program. Housinq The Housing budget remained essentially the same as FY1999-00, with a .15 percent decrease, reducing the adopted budget amount to $57,799. This is due to the Group Health Insurance fund balance absorbing some of the expected increase in rates for the City. The department reduced the assistant director's position from 45 percent to 40 percent funding from the General Fund. Development The adopted Development budget is $5,086,642, representing a 15.91 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. Development's budget includes an addition of $61,021 for hiring an additional planner position, as well as an addition of $10,700 for the hiring of one senior customer service representative position. In order to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Combined Residential Inspection Program, the department's adopted budget was increased by $47,000 to purchase two new vehicles. Influenced by continued strong citywide development and its inherent impact on departmental operation, the adopted budget was increased by $29,525 for scheduled temporaries due to the continuous need to hire temporary residential inspectors. E-29 Human Relations Commission The adopted Human Relations Commission budget is $306,026, a 13.43 percent increase over the FY1990-00 adopted budget. The adopted budget includes $19,718 to increase the director's position from 75 percent funded to fully funded from the General Fund. The budget also includes a$9,648 increase for four new computers on the lease exchange program. Employment and Training The Employment and Training Department merged with the Tarrant County Workforce Network on July 1, 1998. As a result, the City department has been phased entirely into the County department. All authorized positions have been reduced through attrition or alternative placement within the City. Internal Audit The adopted Internal Audit budget is $868,616, which is a 7.61 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. The department's budget increased by $47,818 for salary increases. In addition, the department will participate in the lease exchange program for its first full year, increasing IT Solutions charges by $15,349. Citv Secretary The adopted City Secretary budget is $495,084, representing an 8.24 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. The department's budget increased by $13,005 to meet increased Information Technology Solutions Department's schedule of rates for FY2000-01. An increase of $3,846 is included for additional leased computers as part of the lease exchange program. The travel expenses line item was increased by $2,000 in order to meet the department's annual traveling requirements. Law The adopted Law budget is $3,251,726, which is a 19.14 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. The department's budget increased by $152,215 to add a chief litigator and legal secretary in order to support the department's efforts to be more aggressive in trying cases brought against the City. The adopted budget increased by $94,250 to increase each attorney's training allowance to $1,000, allowing them to keep current with issues affecting the City. In addition, the adopted budget increased by $57,522 to upgrade the technology and research capabilities in the department, and by $74,556 to address ergonomic furniture needs. Finance The adopted budget for the Finance Department is $4,980,001, which represents an increase of 9.26 percent from the FY1999-00. As a result of the implementation of the BuySpeed purchasing system, one account clerk position in the Accounting Division was eliminated from the department's budget. The department's budget was increased $49,676 to reflect increased charges for the IT Solutions department's schedule of rates for FY2000-01. Additionally, the adopted budget was increased by $26,259 as part of a program to convert older purchased computers to leased computers. The adopted travel expense line item was increased by $7,000 to enable division heads to attend various conferences, seminars and workshops. Human Resources The adopted Human Resources budget is $2,948,431, which represents an 8.17 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. The most significant budget increase is $253,264 for actual and anticipated salary increases. An additional $42,554 was added for replacement of all departmentally owned computers with City lease equipment. Retirement increased by $25,340 due to salary increases resulting from implementation of the FY1999-00 compensation plan. Funds budgeted for office equipment decreased by ($25,000) because the FY1999-00 allocation for that account included E-30 a one-time expenditure for a Sigma applicant tracking system upgrade. The scheduled temporaries account increased by $21,167 due to an addition of funds to offset the salary cost of maintaining the Critical Incident Stress Management Coordinator as an overage position until it can be absorbed through attrition in FY2000-01. The adopted budget also increased by $14,624 for workers' compensation expenses based on projected FY2000-01 costs. Risk Management The adopted budget for the Risk Management Department is $1,035,307, which represents a 7.23 percent increase above the FY1999-00 adopted budget. Salaries will increase by a total of $49,186. The department will spend an additional $11,396 for an increase in occupational health service expenses. The costs of drug screening are projected to increase above FY1999-00 levels. Newly hired Fire and Police employees must also undergo Hepatitis series immunization and re-boostering. The factors that account for the remainder of the increase include group health expenditures and information technology services. Transportation and Public Works The Transportation and Public Works Department's adopted budget is $30,684,776, which is a 2.79 percent increase from the department's FY1999-00 adopted budget. The budget includes $214,033 for permanent funding of five overage positions in the Traffic Engineering Division and Planning and Development Division. It also includes an increase of $326,119 for the drainage improvement program. There is an increase in the department's budget of $269,000 to provide sidewalks for pedestrian traffic and $200,000 to install traffic calming devices for streets and purchase pavement marking materials. These increases are somewhat offset by a decrease of ($267,916) for workers' compensation and a decrease of ($103,904) for equipment services charges based on age of fleet. The adopted budget includes $636,500 for the replacement of vehicles and equipment in the budget. Citv Services The City Service Department's adopted budget of $5,337,093 represents a 4.7 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. An additional $323,155 was added to the FY2000-01 adopted budget for actual and anticipated salary increases. The adopted budget also includes a $100,000 increase for additional public property mows to enable the department to meet Council requests for improved public properties maintenance. The adopted budget increased by $60,000 for the purchase of the VOCARTA automated ownership identification system, which will enable field personnel to automatically correlate lot, block and ownership information for properties in violation of the City code. The adopted budget allocation for postage decreased by ($50,100) based on actual usage. The temporary labor allocation increased by $35,000 to enable the department to meet the anticipated, continued high demand for such services due to significant recent departmental use of major medical leave. Furthermore, the department has been authorized to spend an additional $33,800 on the purchase of two inspector vehicles. Planninq The Planning Department's adopted budget is $1,372,586, which is a 4.67percent increase from the Department's FY1999-00 adopted budget. The budget includes an increase of $43,730 to reflect the transfer of one Planner position from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to the General Fund. Public Events The $8,365,487 adopted budget represents a 7.57 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. An additional $396,011 was added to the adopted budget based on actual and anticipated FY2000-01 salary increases. The adopted budget decreased by ($107,680) due to the elimination of budgeted salary savings, which have become unnecessary due to the department's improved E-31 employee retention rate. Funding totaling $97,313 was added to the adopted budget per increased actual utilization of other contractual services. Moreover, the adopted budget increased by $93,000 because of significant FY1999-00 vehicle and equipment repair expenditures. Due to recent, substantial account savings, the inside repairs and maintenance allocation decreased by ($86,000) in the adopted budget. Largely a result of savings created by the recent conversion of several temporary positions into permanent, scheduled temporaries funding decreased by ($74,973) for FY2000-01. The FY2000-01 allocation for water and wastewater charges also decreased by ($73,000) based on actual usage. Furthermore, $63,500 in funding was added for anticipated computer leases, since all departmental computers will have been replaced by lease equipment by fiscal year end. An additional $59,400 was budgeted for the purchase of replacement vehicles and equipment. Police The adopted budget for the Police Department is $92,807,206, a 5.23 percent increase above the FY1999-00 adopted budget. Thirteen authorized positions will be added for a total cost of $367,190, including 10 police officers in April 2001. The additional police officers will enforce traffic laws in all areas of the City. The department will require an additional $3,646,498 to implement the FY2000-01 compensation plan, including salaries and retirement contributions. Given the increasing department staff size and increasing salaries, an additional $1,297,952 will be required to provide benefits for the entire staff, including group health insurance, retirement contributions, overtime, shift differential pay, and Medicare. The Risk Management Department will use the Workers' Compensation fund balance to pay for a portion of projected workers' compensation benefits in the Police Department, which creates a $719,692 decrease from the FY1999-00 adopted level. Fire The adopted budget for the Fire Department is $58,568,555, which is a 6.44 percent increase from the FY1999-00 adopted budget. The adopted budget increased by $817,617 for the addition of 14 civil service employees who are staffing Station 40, a new station the City inherited when it annexed the Lake Country area in FY1999-00. The department's adopted budget also reflects a $222,584 increase for five civilian personnel added as part of an administrative reorganization of the department. The budget includes an increase of $5,085,863 for civil service and civilian -step salary increases from FY1999-00 and for FY2000-01. The adopted budget includes an increase of $230,000 for the purchase of safety equipment, including air tanks that are due to expire in FY2000-01. The department's adopted budget decreased by ($200,000) due to the elimination of funds for one-time upgrades to stations in FY1999-00. The adopted budget increased by $189,131 for civil service overtime to match the 8 percent increase in civil service salaries granted in FY1999-00 and the 6 percent increase projected for FY2000-01. The department's adopted budget increased by $126,000 for fuel cost increases and for labor rate increases imposed by the City's Equipment Services Division. Municipal Court The adopted budget for the Municipal Court Department is $8,888,713, which represents an 11.01 percent increase above the FY1999-00 adopted budget. Ten authorized positions will be added for a total cost of $375,631. Nine of the positions will provide security services at the Public Safety and Courts Building and will be funded by a transfer from the Municipal Court Building Security Fund. The remaining position, as authorized by City Council on May 23, 2000, will administer ground transportation commerce in the City. An increase of $294,552 has been included to fund increases in salaries, group health insurance, and retirement contributions. The department will also renovate cash stations and replace furniture at a total cost of $136,050. E-32 Public Health The adopted Public Health department budget is $6,129,931, which is a .30 percent decrease below FY1999-00 adopted budget. The adopted budget includes an increase of $200,000 in salary savings, to better reflect the department's normal vacancy and turnover rate. In addition, the adopted budget includes a $72,000 increase to add one Animal Control Officer and a truck to address the growing population needs in the department. Environmental Management The adopted Environmental Management budget is $1,335,172, representing a 4.47 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. The adopted budget reflects an increase of $68,078 for the addition to the department of an Energy Manager position previously budgeted in the City Manager's Office. An additional $23,500 was added to the budget to purchase one vehicle per the vehicle replacement plan. An increase. of $5,524 is included for additional leased computers as part of the lease exchange program. Parks and Communitv Services The adopted budget for the Parks and Community Services Department is $18,521,318, a 11.97 percent increase from the department's FY1999-00 adopted budget. The budget includes an increase of funds of $390,663 to convert four overages to permanent status, and for operational enhancements at the Botanic Garden. This includes significant increases for the costs of water, operating supplies, botanical supplies, and repair and maintenance at the Garden. The adopted budget includes an increase of $51,708 for the conversion of a Planner position overage to permanent status. The department's adopted budget includes a $724,639 increase for personnel, supplies, contractual services and construction of new soccer fields. This is the second of a five-year program to substantially increase the number of soccer fields and improve the quality of existing ones. The budget includes an increase of $1,086,561 for actual and anticipated salary increases. The department's budget increased by $385,394 for various technology costs, including additional leased computers, phone cost increases, and an increase in the number of technology projects in the department. The budget includes an increase of $201,516 for scheduled temporary employees to reflect pay increases for seasonal help, as well as for increases in the number of temporary employees needed to staff additional fields. The budget includes a $191,192 increase for supplies and contractual funds to pay for annual maintenance on dedicated parkland that the City has recently acquired. Zoo The adopted budget for the Zoo is $2,838,609, which is a 2.90 percent increase from the department's FY1999-00 adopted budget. As part of an agreement between the Zoo Association and the Parks and Community Services Department, 12 positions have been deleted through attrition, for savings of $309,782, An offsetting amount of $323,219 has been added to the scheduled temporaries account to assist in paying the cost of Zoo operations. The budget is higher than the FY1999-00 adopted budget to reflect an inflation increase for the City's contract with the Zoo Association. Library The adopted Library budget is $12,357,170, which is a 13.31 percent increase over the FY1999-00 adopted budget. The adopted budget includes an increase of $725,708 for the first full year of operation of the Summerglen branch. In addition, there is $478,676 budgeted for salary increases. The adopted budget also includes $70,162 for the addition of two librarians at the Central Library to enhance the information desk operations, The adopted budget also includes $120,000 for the library to address safety and ergonomic needs, and $40,300 to add intrusion and fire systems to library branches system -wide. E-33 Non -Departmental The adopted budget for Non -Departmental is $72,568,277. This is a $3,634,689 or 5.27 percent increase from the previous year's adopted level. This includes a $1.3 million increase in retiree insurance costs that coincides with the rising costs of health care insurance. There is also a $941,066 increase in the debt service transfer due to the decreased use of the debt service reserves. Contractual services experienced a 68.9 percent increase due to the anticipated implementation of the constituent complaint tracking system, an in-depth study of the Equipment Services Division of the City Services Department, and payment to the Historic port Worth Council. There are also increases in information technology costs by $309,670 for implementation of a new budget and analysis system, $275,000 in election costs for the upcoming City Council elections, and $268,525 in the City's litigation expenses. However, these increases are partially offset by a decrease of ($210,075) due to the completion of the Network Implementation Plan and an ($181,930) decrease in the City's unemployment compensation transfer. E-34REVENUE SUMMARY ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED CHANGE FROM % CHANGE FROM % 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 1999-00 ADOPTED CHANGE RE -ESTIMATE CHANGE Property Taxes $157,482,829 $156,609,937 $169,303,445 $11,820,616 7.51% $12,693,508 8.11% Sales Taxes $70,161,104 $72,665,828 $75,577,115 $5,416,011 7.72% $2,911,287 4,01% Other Local Taxes $9,511,037 $9,471,666 $10,528,805 $1,017,768 10.70% $1,057,139 11,16% Licenses & Permits $35,570,523 $36,423,745 $36,988,631 $1,418,108 3.99% $564,886 1.55% Fines & Forfeitures $12,076,966 $12,549,485 $13,346,635 $1,269,669 10.51% $797,150 6.35% Use of Money & Property $11,837,783 $11,258,677 $11,944,764 $106,981 0.90% $686,087 6.09% From Other Agencies $1 ,116,542 $1,164,5$5 $715,494 -$401,048 -35.92% -$449,091 -38,56% Charges for Services $16,002,264 $15,513,697 $1fi,113,977 $111,713 0.70% $600,280 3.87% Other Revenue $867,680 $1,436,620 $739,271 -$128,409 -14.80% -$697,349 -48.54% Transfers $8,168.020 $8.307.237 M099.473 $331,453 11.40% IM 236 9.54% Total Revenues $322,794,748 $325,401,478 $344,357,610 Use of Fund Balance $1,059,630 $0 $0 TOTAL GENERAL $323,854,378 $325,401,478 $344,357,610 FUND Note: All prior year figures are unaudited. $21,562,862 6.68% $18,956,132 5.83% -$1,059,630-100.00% $0 $20,503,232 6.33% $18,956,132 5,83% E-35 PROPERTY TAXES The FY2000-01 adopted budget reduces the City's property tax rate to $0.8750 per $100 net taxable valuation, a 0.6 percent decrease from the FY1999-00 rate of $0.8850. The City's property tax roll of net taxable value increased $1.7 billion or 9.9 percent from the 1999 certified roll to the 2000 certified roil. This is the sixth consecutive increase. As a result, the City is projected to collect $11.8 million more than in FY1999-00, even with a lower tax rate. FA $20.00 $19.50 $19.00 $18.50 $18.00 $17.50 $17.00 $16.50 $16.00 $15.50 $15.00 $14.50 $14.00 $13.50 $13.00 $12.50 $12.00 $11.50 $11.00 Net Taxable Values in Billion $ 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 The estimate of the FY2000-01 tax roll is based on the certified roll as provided by the Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) in July 2000. The assumed collection rate is 97.25 percent. Other factors affecting current property tax revenue are the exemptions to assessed valuation authorized by the State and additional exemptions granted on a local option and approved by City Council. The most significant exemptions approved by the City Council are the general homestead exemption of 20 percent available to all residential homestead properties, an additional $40,000 homestead exemption granted to senior citizens, and the Freeport exemption. E-36 The following indicates the loss of taxable value for various exemptions from the preliminary roll: Total Appraised Value ($000) $23,967,427,343 Less: Deferred Special Use Value Loss Agricultural $367,797,877 Scenic Land $5,789,310 Partial Exemption Value Loss Disable Veteran $28,766,098 Over-65 $762,335,483 Homestead $1,399,547,419 Disabled Person $58,689,103 Freeport Inventory $1,634,011,223 Solar/Wind $13,886 Pollution Control $2,910,054 Foreign Trade Zone $47,924,125 Historic Site $16,380,546 Prorated Absolute $2,641,354 Abatement Value Loss $556,023,353 Nominal Personal Property $170,478 Indigent Housing Loss $0 Net Taxable Value $19,084,427,034 Less Shrinkage $95,422,135 + Minimum Value of Protested Values $661,102,280 Adjusted Net $19,650,107,179 Original Levy @ .8750 $171,938,438 Less Estimated Levy Adjustments $5,815,173 Estimated Final Levy $166,123,265 97.25% Collection Levy $164,845,265 SALES TAX Revenue from the City's one percent of the sales tax, exclusive of the one-half percent special use tax for the Crime Control and Prevention District Fund, is projected to equal $75,577,115, an increase of $5,416,011 or 7.72 percent over the FY1999-00 budget. Sales tax collections for FY1999-00 are anticipated to exceed the revised budget by $2,504,724 or 3.57 percent. The FY2000-01 projection represents an increase of $2,911,287 or 4.01 percent over the F'Y1999-00 re -estimate. This revenue is dependent on the level of retail sales. E-37 OTHER LOCAL TAXES Revenues from other local taxes are anticipated to increase by $1,017,768 or 10.70 percent due to projected increases in revenue from the gross receipts -telephone tax, the mixed beverage tax and the gross receipts -bingo tax. LICENSES AND PERMITS Revenues from licenses and permits are anticipated to be $1,418,108 or 3.99 percent higher than the adopted budget for FY1999-00. The increase is due to increases in revenue from the water and wastewater street rental fee, the telecom franchise fee, and the cable street rental fee. FINES AND FORFEITURES Total revenue from fines and forfeitures are estimated to increase over the FY1999-00 budget by $1,269,699 or 10.51 percent. The increase is associated with anticipated increases in traffic and parking violation collections. USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY Revenue from the use of money and property is projected to increase by $106,981 or 0.90 percent from the FY1999-00 budget. The increase is due to higher earnings from interest on invested City funds. REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES Revenue from other agencies is projected to be $401,048 or 35.92 percent below the FY1999-00 budget. The decrease is due to anticipated decreases in revenue from the Tarrant County Health Center. CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES Revenues from service charges are projected to be $111,713 or 0.70 percent above the FY1999-00 budget. Demand for services in many fee -for -service areas is expected to increase in FY2000-01, but revenue collection from building permits is expected to be lower because of the use of third -party inspectors. The City collects less revenue for building permits when developers opt for third -party inspection. MISCELLANEOUS AND OTHER REVENUE Miscellaneous and other revenues are projected to be ($128,409) or 14.80 percent lower than the FY1999-00 budget. This revenue account is used to record special one-time revenues and other revenues that cannot be recorded elsewhere. TRANSFERS Transfer payments are projected to increase by $931,453 or 11.40 percent. The increase is primarily from anticipated increases in transfers from the Crime Control and Prevention District Fund to support Police salaries and for payments to the Tarrant County Jail. Also included are increases from the Lake Worth Trust Fund to support a new patrol boat for the City Marshal's office at Lake Worth and for salary increases for existing City Marshals. E-38 FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 ALL FUNDS COMPARISON OF General Fund BEGINNING BALANCE; $36,262,961 ESTIMATED REVENUES: Taxes (a) Property Tax 169,303,445 (b) Sales Tax 75,577,115 (c) Other Local Taxes 10,528,805 Licenses and Permits 36,988,631 Fines and Forfeitures 13,346,635 Use of Money and Property 11,944,764 Revenue From Other Agencies 715,494 Charges for Current Services 16,113,977 Miscellaneous and Other Revenue 739,271 Total Revenues 335,258,137 Other Financing Sources (a) Transfers In 9,099,473 (b) Non -Revenues Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources 344,357,610 Less Reserves Total Estimated Revenues and Balance Forward $380,620,5/1 EXPENDITU RESIEXPENSES: General Administration 16,193,819 Public Safety 160,264,474 Transportation and Public Works 30,684,776 Parks and Community Services 21,359,927 Public Library 12,357,170 Public Health 6,129,931 Public Events and Facilities 8,355,487 Non- Departmental 25,637,304 Employment and Training 0 Planning and Development 6,459,228 Human Resources 2,948,431 Housing 57,799 Debt Service 46,930,973 City Services 5,337,093 Environmental Management 1,335,172 Human Relations Commission 306,026 Utility Service Culture and Tourism Service Delivery Transfers Out Total Expenditures and Uses 344,357,610 ENDING BALANCE: Reserve (committed) Reserve (uncommitted) 36,262,961 Undesignated Total Ending Balance 36,262,961 Total Appropriated Expenditures and Ending Balance $380,620,571 Internal Special Grant Enterprise Service Revenue Funds Funds Funds Fund $872,690 $17,106,777 ($9,066,344) $10,105,742 34,670,863 10,182,299 2,586,650 684,973 2,656,620 1,330,800 1,645,950 220,759,871 37,163,405 819,797 6.083.473 160,503 2.608.822 229,499,964 37,323,908 54,530,154 5,677,638 240,830 16,415.047 16,415,047 5,677,638 $17,281,131 $252,284,379 $28,251,564 $64,635,896 51,660,148 25,432,438 2,045,152 940,238 37,895,002 172,178 893,939 13,102,537 58,968,012 3,740,722 10,743,714 327,120 2,945,000 7,919,566 1,480,113 16,415,047 114,368,882 37,070,091 50,411,859 872,690 17,106,777 (9,066,344) 10,105,742 120.808.720 253,817 4,118.295 872,690 137,915,497 (8,812,527) 14,224,037 $17,287,737 �252,284,379 $28,257,564 $64,635,896 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES General Parking Water and Crime Control Total Obligation Golf Building Airport Sewer and Prevention All Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service District Funds $10,700,888 $128,301 $736,510 ($6,504) $3,186,298 $28,855,187 $98,882,506 $169,303,445 34,670,863 $144,918,841 $20,711,104 $39,575,281 $14,031,608 3,000,000 5,000 20,000 4,000 100,000 $19,061,184 $2,361,444 $274,857,050 325,100 0 200,000 0 6,600 1.645,950 $11,769.719 3,325,100 5,000 220,000 4,000 106,600 36,316,813 $696,589,676 46,930,973 557,236 453,194 $62,959,344 $16,415,047 50,256,073 562,236 220,000 457,194 106,600 36,316,813 775,964,067 (4,516,792) (88,059) (170,000) (33,500) (6,600) (4,814,951) $56,440,169 $602,478 $786,510 $411,190 $3,286,298 $65,112,000 §869,190,792 i $93,286,405 28,323,949 $228,528,577 $30,684,776 925,339 $23,397,682 $12,357.170 $6,129,931 $8,355,487 $25,637,304 $0 $6,459,228 $3,842,370 $13,160,336 52,993,517 562,236 453,194 1,910,929 $161,818,861 275,275 $20,096,804 $4,607,292 $306,026 $0 $7,919,566 $1,480,113 6,792,250 $6,792,250 52,993,517 562,236 0 453,194 1,910,929 36,316,813 $654,860,178 3,446,652 40,242 786,510 (36,004) 1,375,369 28,855,187 89,749,782 125,180,832 3,446,652 40,242 786,510 (36,004) 1,375,369 28,855,187 214,930,614 $56,440,169 $602,478 $7b6.510 $41'1,190 __- P,286,298 $65,172,000 $869,790,792 E-39 TOTAL CITE' OPERATING FUND STRUCTURE I ENTERPRISE FUNDS I GENERAL FUND I INTERNAL SERVICE I SPECIAL FUNDS I i FUNDS I I OPERATING DEBT SERVICE I I OPERATING DEBT SERVICE OPERATING I ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS Municipal Golf Courses Mayor and Council Temporary Labor Culture and Tourism Airports City Manager Office Services Lake Worth Trust Water and Wastewater Housing Equipment Services Insurance Municipal Parking Facilities Development Engineering Cable Communications Solid Waste Human Relations Commission Information Grants Internal Audit Technology Solutions Awarded Assets City Secretary Crime Control and Prevention Law District Finance City Store Human Resources Environmental Management Fund Risk Management Transportation and Public Works City Services Planning Public Events Police Fire Municipal Court Public Health Environmental Management Parks and Community Services Zoo Library Non -Departmental GENERAL FUND $344,357,610 54.67% AIRPORTS FUND $3,084,972 0.49% MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES $258,258 0.04% GOLF FUND $5,767,929 0.92% WATER AND SEWER $202,662,651 32.17% GENERAL FUND $344,357,610 54.20% AIRPORTS FUND $3,108,045 0.49% MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES $266,970 0.04% GOLF FUND $5,767,929 0.91 % WATER AND SEWER $202,662,561 31.90% CITY OF FORT WORTH TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET 2000-01 TOTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL $629,898,491* "Excludes internal services funds and insurance funds totaling $81,054,818 TOTAL REVENUES E-43 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT $2,960,596 0.47% SOLID WASTE -$23,227,496 3.69% CITY STORE •$112,210 0.02% CULTURE AND TOURISM •$7,919,566 1.26% LAKE WORTH TRUST $776,416 0.12% CABLE COMMUNICIATIONS $875,875 0.14% AWARDED ASSETS -$684,973 0.11 % CRIME DISTRICT -$37,210,029 5.91 % ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT $2,945,000 0.46% SOLID WASTE $24,535,002 3.86% CITY STORE $120,000 0.02% CULTURE AND TOURISM $10,182,299 1.60% LAKE WORTH TRUST $776,416 0.12% CABLE COMMUNICIATiONS $878,979 0.14% AWARDED ASSETS $684,973 0.11 % CRIME DISTRICT $39,062,669 TOTAL $fi35,348,45,3 `Does not include internal services funds and insurance funds E-44 EXPENDITURES I STRONG NEIGHBORHOO1 $36,453,508 10.30% DEBT SERVICE $46,930,973 13.63% SUPPORT SERVI $44,779,554 13.00% REVENUES SALES TAX $75,577,115 21.95% PROPERTY TAXES $169,303,445 49.17% 1 .1..1 1 .. , - o `. ■ SOUND ECONOMY $44,126,905 12.81 % SAFE COMMUNITY $173,066,670 50.26% LICENSES AND PERMITS 10.74% REVENUES FROM OTHER AGENCIES $715,494 0.21 % FINES AND FORFEITURES $13,346,635 3.88% TRANSFERS $9,099,473 2.64% USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY _ $11,944,764 3.47% CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES $16,113,977 4.68% OTHER TAXES $10,528,805 3.06% OTHER REVENUE 0.21 % TOTAL GENERAL FUND 344,357,610 EXPENDITURES Mayor and Council City Manager Housing Development Human Relations Commission Employment Training Internal Audit City Secretary Law Finance Human Resources Risk Management Transportation & Public Works City Services Planning Public Events Police Fire Municipal Court Public Health Environmental Management Parks & Community Services Zoo Library Non Departmental Debt Service TOTAL GENERAL SUMMARY OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND EXPENDITURES E-45 GENERAL FUND BY DEPARTMENT AUTHORIZED POSITIONS EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ADOPTED ADOPTED ACTUAL ADOPTED ADOPTED 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 4.00 4.00 4.00 $656,006 $640,305 $761,507 54.00 54.00 55.00 4,136,029 4,357,149 4,801,578 0.00 0.45 0.40 23,280 57,886 57,799 77.00 77.00 79.00 4,278,715 4,388,317 5,086,642 3.75 3.75 4.00 224,445 269,7.86 306,026 0.00 0.00 0.00 108,610 76,443 0 14.00 15.00 15.00 734,318 807,186 868,616 8.00 8.00 8.00 419,219 457,403 495,084 38.00 38.00 40A0 2,574,020 2,729,324 3,251,726 60.00 60.00 60.00 4,515,519 4,557,859 4,980,001 35.00 35.00 35.00 2,513,507 2,725,716 2,948,431 12.00 13.00 13.00 843,626 965,507 1,035,307 390.00 390.00 399.00 27,164,221 29,852,946 30,684,776 67.50 68.00 68.00 4,881,541 5,097,462 5,337,093 18.00 19.00 20.00 1,246,943 1,311,305 1,372,586 109.00 115.00 115.00 7,786,310 7,767,558 8,355,487 1,371.00 1,372.00 1,385.00 80,866,048 88,195,577 92,807,206 762.00 763.00 782.00 51,806,048 55,023,217 58,568,555 141.50 150.00 160,00 7,150,050 8,006,785 8,888,713 124.00 120.00 121.00 5,738,160 6,148,565 6,129,931 20.00 19.00 20.00 1,196,916 1,278,072 1,335,172 273.40 278.40 286.40 14,411,984 16,541,911 18,521,318 77.00 74.00 62.00 2,901,012 . 2,758,609 2,838,609 182,30 198.50 200.50 9,884,607 10,905,903 12,357,170 3.00 3.00 3.00 25,548,096 22,943,680 25,637,304 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.134,009 45,989,907 46.930,973 3,844.46 3,878.10 3,935.30 $309,743,239 $323,854,378 $344,357,610 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET E-46 Enterprise Funds SUMMARY OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND EXPENDITURES OTHER FUNDS Municipal Golf Courses Municipal Parking Facilities Airports Water and Sewer Solid Waste City Store Internal Service Funds Temporary Labor Engineering Office Services Equipment Services Information Systems Special Funds Culture and Tourism Lake Worth Trust Cable Communications Police/Awarded Assets Property/Casualty Worker's Compensation Group Health Insurance Crime District Unemployment Compensation Environmental Management Fund TOTAL ALL FUNDS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS ACTUAL ADOPTED ADOPTED 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ADOPTED ADOPTED 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 64.00 64.00 63.00 $5,672,868 $5,459,557 $5,767,929 1.00 1.00 1.00 232,247 252,753 258,258 46.00 30.00 30.00 7,573,507 2,790,515 3,084,972 747.00 753.00 753.00 187,978,470 186,694,177 202,662,561 78.00 78.00 78.00 21,157,213 21,272,258 23,227,496 2.00 2.00 2.00 113,000 128,637 112,210 2.00 2.00 2.00 1,008,442 985,500 894,939 161.00 160.60 156.75 8,072,759 8,395,453 9,261,400 18.00 19.00 19.00 1,928,107 1,877,641 2,027,620 153.00 153.00 148.00 12,075,950 11,277,049 12,382,479 107.00 111.00 111.00 11,993,105 10,908,318 12,504,653 7.00 8.00 8.00 6,721,923 7,919,566 7,919,566 0.00 0.00 0.00 745,923 737,434 776,416 13.00 13.00 13.00 742,301 866,504 875,875 0.00 0.00 0.00 831,809 617,214 684,973 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,821,128 5,262,470 5,066,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,893,521 8,766,150 10,104,930 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,493,636 26,214,574 28,461,953 177.00 182.00 184.00 38,792,634 28,346,137 37,210,029 0.00 0.00 0.00 206,084 325,000 350,000 20.00 20.00 20.00 1.759.975 2.914.619 2.960.596 5,440.45 5,474.70 5,524.05 $653,557,841 $655,865,904 $710,953,309 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET co z O H O rL w N_ €Y_ O Q U- O w w m z Thousands 6000-11 General Fund 2000 2001 0 All Funds AUTHORIZED POSITIONS BY FUNCTION IN THE GENERAL FUND FOR FY2000-01 Safe Community 2,536.00 64.44% Support Sery 233.00 5.92% Strong Neighborhoods 573.30 14.57% Economy 593.00 15.07% E-47 FUND: F-1 FUND STATEMENT GENERALFUND The General Fund is the largest fund within the City and accounts for all financial resources of the government except for those required to be accounted for in another fund. The fund has the largest amount of revenue in the overall City Budget. In accordance with the City's FY2000-01 Financial Management Policy Statements (FMPS) in regards to a reliable, equitable, and diversified revenue stream, the General Fund revenues include property taxes, sales taxes, license and permit fees, service charges, fines and forfeitures, and other miscellaneous revenues, such as other governmental agency revenues and interest revenue. These revenues are used to finance City departments that provide basic services, as well as pay interest on bonds sold for capital improvements. There are several other funds in the City of Fort Worth„ however, all activities that are supported by tax dollars are included in the General Fund. The City's property tax generates the largest percentage of revenue for the City. Property taxes are levied on both real estate and personal property, according to the property's valuation and the tax rate. Consequently, in striving to minimize the property tax burden on Fort Worth citizens, the City's property rate has been reduced to $0.8750 per $100 net taxable valuation. Sales tax, the second largest revenue source for the City, also underpins the City's General Fund. Debt Service, which is the City's obligation to pay the principal and interest on all bonds and other debt instruments according to a payment schedule, is $46,930,973. It represents only 13.65% of the FY2000-01 adopted General Fund budget. In accordance with the FMPS, the City's Finance Department determines administrative service charges due to the General Fund. These charges are then budgeted accordingly in all funds. The City also makes a concerted effort to maintain the General Fund undesignated fund balance at 10 percent of the current year budget expenditures. In order to monitor the condition of the General Fund and all other City funds, a monthly financial report is prepared evaluating revenues and expenditures, as well as performance indicators. Additionally, the City also prepares a Long -Range Financial Forecast that discusses trends affecting the City, as well as critical issues citywide. However, long-term issues are addressed as policy issues and presented for Council action, as are the Financial Management Policy Statements that frame the budget document. The General Fund is comprised of 3,935.30 authorized positions and 24 operating departments. Each department has a primary focus that is categorized into one of the following goals: Strong Neighborhoods, Sound Economy, and Safe Community, Support Services are also offered through the General Fund. The total General Fund for the departments for FY2000-01 is $344,357,610. Strong Neighborhoods are areas where all people can enjoy living, playing, and rearing their families. A livable, vibrant, and desirable Fort Worth is the result of a collection of strong neighborhoods. Departments include Housing, Human Relations Commission, Parks and Community Services, Library, Zoo, and Planning. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET F-2 FUND STATEMENT GENERALFUND A Sound Economy is an environment that provides the resources necessary to enhance the quality of life for the entire community. Departments include Development, Transportation and Public Works, and Public Events. A Safe Community is a place where people can be free of fear and threatof life, health and property. Departments include City Services, Police, Fire, Public Health, Municipal Court, and Environmental Management. Support Services empower direct service providers to achieve the City's vision in a prudent and responsible manner. Departments include Mayor and City Council, City Manager's Office, Human Resources, Law, City Secretary, Risk Management, Finance, Internal Audit, and Non -Departmental. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET . . .. . ... . . .. . .. ... . . .. . .. . .... . .. . . .. . F-3 f GENERA!, FUND'EUDGET SUMiMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 REVENUES: Property Tax ` $169,303,445 Sales Tax ;` 75,577,115 Other Taxes 10,528,805 Licenses and Permits 36,988631 Fines.and Forfeitures 13,346635 Use`of Money and Property 11,944,764 Revenue from Other Agencies 715,494 Charges for Current Services 16,113,977 Other Revenue 71.39271 TOTAL. REVENUE $335,258137 C3ThIERFINANCING SOURCES :.:, ::: Transfers $9\099.473 7OTAL':REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURC .. $344,357,610 EXPENDITURt=S, Personal Services' $219,627,485 Supplies 12,934,890 Contractual Services 62.643;361 TOTAL. RECURRING.I=XF�ENDITU,tES $295,205,736 COMPARISON OF GENERA. FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL EXPENDITURES 1998-99 STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS Housing $23,280 Human Relations 224,445 Planning 1,246,943 Parks & Community Services 14,411,984 Zoo 2,901,012 Public Library 9.884,607 Sub -Total $28,692,271 SOUND ECONOMY Development $4,278,715 Employment & Training 108,610 Transportation/Public Works 27,164,221 Public Events 7,786,310 Sub -Total $39,337,856 SAFE COMMUNITY City Services Police Fire Municipal Court Public Health Environmental Management Sub -Total SUPPORT SERVICES Mayor and City Council City Manager Internal Audit City Secretary Law Finance Human Resources Risk Management Non -Departmental Debt Service Sub -Total $4,881,541 80,866,048 51,806, 048 7,150, 050 5,738,160 1.196,916 $151,638, 763 $656, 006 4,136,029 734,318 419,219 2,574,020 4,515,519 2,513,507 843,626 25, 548, 096 48,134,009 $90,074,349 BY FUNCTION ORIGINAL ADOPTED BUDGET 1999-00 $67,886 269,786 1,311,305 16,541,911 2,758,609 10, 905, 903 $31,845,400 $4,388,317 76,443 29,852,946 7,767,558 $42,085,264 $5,097,462 88,195, 577 55,023,217 8,006,785 6,148, 565 1,278,072 $163,749,678 $640,305 4,357,149 807,186 457,403 2,729,324 4,557,859 2,725,716 965,507 22,943,680 45, 989.907 $86,174,036 REVISED BUDGET 1999-00 $57, 886 269,786 1,311,305 16,792,934 2,758,609 11,012.713 $32,203,233 $4,680,608 122,964 30,938,828 8.183,658 $43,926,058 $5, 097,462 88,295,316 55,800,856 8,006,785 6,148, 565 1,286,572 $164,635,556 $649,101 4,397,139 807,186 457,403 2,729,324 4,557,859 2,725,716 965,507 23,180,940 45.989,907 $86,460,082 RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1999-00 2000-01 $56,766 245,000 1,344,777 16,653,515 2,758,631 10, 961, 334 $32,020,023 $4, 811,223 102,591 30,920,064 7,979,639 $43,813,517 $4,955,003 87, 591,264 56,202,836 8,107,350 5,841,534 1.239.471 $163,937,458 $675, 740 4,196, 774 807,837 453,979 2,742,365 4,715,198 2,680,508 940,394 23,548,698 45.989, 907 $86,751,399 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $309,743,239 $323,854,378 $327,224,929 $326,522,397 $57,799 306,026 1,372,586 18,521,318 2,838,609 12.357.170 $35,453, 508 $5, 086,642 0 30, 684, 776 8.355.487 $44,126, 905 $5,337,093 92,807,206 58, 568, 555 8,888,713 6,129, 931 1,3.35,172 $173,066,670 $761, 507 4,801,578 868,616 495,084 3,251, 726 4,980,001 2,948,431 1,035,307 25,637,304 46,930,973 $91,710,527 $344,357,610 F-5 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET COMPARISON OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES F-7 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Property Taxes $138,280,887 $141,333,491 $147,759,670 $157,482,829 $156,609,937 $169,303,445 Sales Taxes $57,845,380 $63,637,537 $66,936,632 $70,161,104 $72,665,828 $75,577,115 Other Local Taxes / ,, $7,609,721 $8,493,014 $8,706,173 $9,511,037 $9,471,666 $10,528,805 Licenses & Permits '° $32,739,490 $34,255,480 $35,466,160 $35,570,523 $36,423,745 $36,988,631 Fines & Forfeitures $9,799,334 $11,315,868 $12,063,547 $12,076,966 $12,549,485 $13,346,635 Use of Money & Property;, ,' $7,996,605 $10,939,647 $9,812,059 $11,837,783 $11,258,677 $11,944,764 From Other Agencies `;,- $1,260,634 $1,142,648 $1,153,567 $1,116,542 $1,164,585 $715,494 Charges for Services $13,762,367 $15,419,718 $15,430,403 $16,002,264 $15,513,697 $16,113,977 'Other Revenue 111,E $1,089,284 $944,065 $765,364 $867,680 $1,436,620 $739,271 Transfers !' $7.846,338 $8.497.234 $7.672.858 $8.168.020 $8.307.237 $9.099.473 Total Revenues $278,230,040 $295,978,702 $305,766,433 $322,794,748 $325,401,478 $344,357,610 Use of Fund Balance Vo Mo $0 $1,059.630 Total General Fund $278,230,040 $295,978,702 $305,766,433 $323,854,378 $325,401,478 $344,357,610 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET l F-8 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Original Levy $135,839,921 $139,855,077 $148,802,699 $158,114,005 $158,114,005 $171,938,438 Tax Collections Current Property Taxes $133,379,073 $136,445,340 $143,946,199 $153,045,829 $152,204,757 $166,123,265 Less Estimated Refunds - - -$1,278,000 Delinquent Property Taxes $2,350,433 $2,609,493 $2,041,665 $2,675,000 $2,734,746 $2,734,746 Vehicle Inventory $0 $73,545 $124,468 $77,000 $77,000 $130.000 Interest/Penalty Charges $1,927,976 $1,705,113 $1,641,687 $1,685,000 $1,593.434 $1,593,434 Tax Attorney Revenue $623,405 $500,000 $5,651 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COLLECTIONS $138,280,887 $141,333,491 $147,759,670 $157,482,829 $156,609,937 $169,303,445 ADJUSTED NET TAXABLE ASSESSED VALUATIONS $14,298,939,000 $15,201,638,000 $16,579,687,930 $17,865,989,000 $17,865,989,000 $19,650,107,179 TAX RATE PER $100 VALUATION GENERAL FUND LEVY Operating Levy $ $81,807,073 $88,189,340 $96,956,292 $108,055,922 $107,214,850 $118,914,292 G,O, Debt Levy $ $51,572,000 $48,256,000 $46,989,907 $44,989,907 $44,989,907 $45.930.973 Operating Levy % of Total Levy 61.33% 64.63% 67.36% 70.60% 70A4% 72.14% G.O, Debt Levy % of Total Levy 38,67% 35.37% 32.64% 29.40% 29.56% 27.86% Operating Levy 0.5814 0.6008 0.6069 0.6076 0.6076 0.6312 G.O. Debt Levy 0.3821 0,3492 0.3131 0.2899 0.2899 0.2438 Total Tax Rate 0,9500 0.9200 0,8975 0.8850 0.8850 0.8750 CURRENT DELINQUENCY 1.81% 2,44% 3.26% 3.21% 3.74% 3.38% Note: All prior year numbers are unaudited CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES F-9 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNTIREVENUE SOURCE 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999.00 1999-00 2000-01 0134010 41 1012 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES $133,379,073 $136,445,340 $143,946,199 $153,045,829 $152,204,757 $164,845,265 0134010 41 1022 PY DELINQUENT PROP TAX $2,350,433 $2,609,493 $2,041,665 $2,675,000 $2,734,746 $2,734,746 0134010 41 1032 VEHICLE INVENTORY TAX $0 $73,545 $124,468 $77,000 $77,000 $130,000 0134010 41 1042 INT/PEN CHAS-DEL TX $1,927,976 $1,705,113 $1,641,687 $1,685,000 $1,593,434 $1,593,434 0134010 41 1052 TAX ATTORNEY REVENUE $623,405 $500,900 $5,651 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE. $138,280,887 $141,333,491 $147,759,670 $157,482,829 $156,609,937 $169,303,445 0134010 41 2102 STATE SALES TAX REVENUE $57,845,380 $63,637,537 $66,936,632 $70,161,104 $72,665,828 $75,577,115 TOTAL SALES TAX REVENUE $57,045,380 $63,637,537 $66,936,632 $70,161,104 $72,665,828 $75,577,115 0134010 41 2072 GROSS RECEIPTS -TELEPHONE $6,503,564 $6,913,631 $7,358,955 $7,837,387 $8,000,000 $8,500,000 0134010 41 2122 STATE MIXED BEVERAGE TAX $849,493 $1,222,179 $999,331 $1,113,760 $1,296,069 $1,680,918 0134010 41 2.132 GROSS RECEIPTS -BINGO PR $256,664 $357,204 $347,887 $559,890 $175,598 $347,887 TOTAL OTHER LOCAL TAXES $7,609,721 $8,493,014 $8,706,173 $9,511,037 $9,471,666 $10,528,805 0201000 42 1152 EST REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760 $2,761 0201000 42 1162 LOADING ZONE RECEIPTS $720 $480 -$460 $0 $0 $0 0201000 42 1192 PARKING METER RECEIPTS $758,017 $77-1,836 $760,792 $900,000 $626,046 $900,000 0201000 42 1202 PARKING METER DAILY RENTA $14,486 $16,035 $30,363 $30,000 $41,609 $57,019 0062000 42 1212 TEMP ENCROACHMENTS $111,777 $119,941 $53,703 $90.000 $106,967 $106,967 0062000 42 1232 PERM ENCROACHMENTS $10,316 $11,006 $8,375 $10,000 $9,386 $10,000 0361000 42 1262 BICYCLE REGISTRATION $9,461 -$9,284 $323 $100 $99 $100 0134010 42 1292 TU FRANCHISE FEE $19,192,470 $19,770,437 $20,525,211 $20,500,000 $20,500,000 $20,200,000 0134010 42 1322 LSG FRANCHISE FEE $3,608,591 $3,329,126 $2,897,562 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 0134010 42 1342 TELCOM FRANCHISE FEE $109,607 $355.517 $378,015 $360,000 $516,434 $400,000 0134010 42 1352 TAXICAB FRANCHISE FEE $23,750 $36,009 $53,250 $53,255 $55,528 $85,904 0134010 42 1362 STREET RENTAL -CABLE TV $1,461.816 $1,625,262 $1,837,174 $1,832,000 $2,502,000 $2,381,151 0134010 42 1372 FRANCHISE FEE -ELECTRIC OT $0 $963 $523 $0 $296 $167 0132000 42 1382 STREET RENTAL -WATER AND S $5,938,547 $6,690,621 $7,168,596 $7,005,799 $7,270,986 $7,724,523 0062000 42 1392 WRECKING/MOVING PMTS $25.350 $24,635 $23,271 $28,000 $22,862 $25,000 0214002 42 1392 WRECKING/MOVING PMTS $16,493 $15,481 $65,200 $86,000 $45,245 $47,000 0062000 42 1402 HOUSE MOVERS PERMITS FEES $2,510 $2,870 $4,208 $3,135 $5,722 $7,782 0353303 42 1422 WRECKER BUSINESS LICENSE $6,749 $9,877 $13,618 $0 $974 $974 0062000 42 1472 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY $1,500 $500 $4,500 $7,500 -$651 $7,500 0503002 42 2502 HEALTH PERMITS FEES $739,735 $779,603 $920,033 $900,000 $1.034.798 $1.243,878 0503002 42 2504 HEALTH PERMIT REISSUE $7,982 $8,770 $11,354 $17,000 $15,490 $21,133 0503002 42 2506 HEALTH REINSPECTION $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 0521000 42 2602 POWER WASHER FEES $3,010 $3,100 $2,562 $4,000 $3,300 $4,249 0503002 42 2694 FOOD MANAGER CERTIFICATIO $3,855 $4,336 $3,675 $4,200 $3,497 $3,328 0503002 42 2832 LITERATURE SALES $451 $324 $611 $1,000 $662 $715 0134010 42 3602 LIQUOR LICENSE FEES $146,460 $144,773 $163,698 $165,873 $138,870 $163,698 0134010 42 3632 JUNK DEALER'S LICENSE FEE $4,947 $4,673 $4,286 $7,000 $4,579 $4,892 0134010 42 3652 SERVICE STATION LICENSE F $11,908 $8,859 $8,803 $12,800 $8,657 $8,700 0062000 42 3662 PLUMBING BUS REGISTRATION $47,822 $52,268 $54,150 $58,701 $47,012 $47,012 0062000 42 3692 ELEC JRNY LIC & REG $32,813 $31,590 $31,930 $34,079 $28,606 $34,079 0062000 42 3702 ELEC MSTR LIC & REG $101,924 $108,352 $107,857 $116,810 $94,415 $116,810 0356105 42 3722 TAXICAB DRIVERS` LICENSES $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 0356200 42 3722 TAXICAB DRIVERS' LIC $0 $0 $8,750 $0 $11,871 $28,871 0134010 42 3732 OTHER OCCUPATIONAL LICENS $4,235 $5,026 $4,677 $5,006 $6,562 $6,562 0134010 42 3742 COIN OPERATED MACHINES FE $30,165 $32,130 $31,710 $33,681 $27,874 $27,874 0134010 42 3752 DANCE HALL FEES $11,000 $12,210 $13,300 $19,261 $12,000 $12,000 0062000 42 3762 MTR VEH JUNK YD & REG $5,400 $9,070 $1,680 $9,000 $171 $9,000 0062000 42 3772 MECH LIC & REG $54,406 $57,349 $58,180 $61,393 $53,315 $53,315 0062000 42 3782 SIGN LIC & REG $13.650 $13,209 $13,350 $20,041 $12,850 $13,000 0062000 42 3783 TEMP POWER PERMITS $8,486 $9,885 $8,900 $10,000 $6,025 $10,000 0062000 42 3785 70NING LETTER $0 $0 $75 $41 $0 $0 0504001 42 4842 DOG LICENSE FEES $147,742 $122,052 $132,196 $129,870 $143.789 $156,398 0362000 42 4882 FIRE -RELATED PERMITS $60,920 $66,928 $60,154 $55,691 $63,138 $66,269 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS $32,739,490 $34,255,480 $35,466,160 $3.9,570,523 $36,423,745 $36,988,631 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET F-10 STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNT/REVENUE SOURCE 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Ld 0381000 43 1013 TRAFFIC FINES -DELINQUENT $2,601.682 $3,252,640 $3,054,971 $2,953,761 $3,008,184 $3,200,002 0381000 43 1014 CHILD SAFTY FUND $84,371 $72,079 $79,508 $73.644 $69.847 $74,000 03B1000 43 1015 UNFORM TRAFFIC ACT $276,497 $268,993 $302,863 $299,135 $296,285 $300,000 0381000 43 1016 NISI FEES $190 $222 $61 $150 $830 $498 0381000 43 1018 SECURITY FEE $88.740 $198 $629 $0 $0 $0 0381000 43 1019 TPP FEES $225 $48,241 $114,875 $106,608 $181,620 $195,000 0391000 43 1021 CC - NOTICE TO APPEAR $260 $6,160 $14,345 $12,236 $15,591 $16,946 0381000 43 1022 CC - PAYMENTS $5,016 $145,227 $257.254 $228,978 $306.293 $364,679 0381000 43 1023 ADM FEES-DEFRD DISPO $2.002,161 $2,005,284 $2,130,904 $2,191,114 $1,959,565 $2,200,000 0381000 43 1033 BAT TAX $4,973 $8,236 $3,616 $12,980 -$2,321 $0 0381000 43 1038 TECHNOLOGY FEES $0 $0 $6,463 $0 $0 $0 0381000 43 1043 GENERAL FINES -DELINQUENT $501,228 $696,381 $709,383 $709,934 $790,719 $900.000 0381000 43 1053 PENALTY FEES $287,270 $859,368 $1,002,202 $1,010,598 $1,546,421 $1,571,344 0381000 43 1060 NTA FEE TRAFFIC CURRENT $362,930 $307,260 $377,684 $363,080 $407,647 $439,986 0381000 43 1063 CIVIL PARKING -CURRENT $261,123 $256,302 $278,884 $278,052 $296,889 $316,055 03B1000 43 1070 NTA FEE TRAFFIC DELINQUEN $178,863 $226,564 $193,326 $207,431 $187,114 $195,000 0381000 43 1073 CIVIL PARKING -DELINQUENT $505,148 $482,564 $516,860 $517,972 $516,486 $516,113 0381000 43 1080 NTA FEE GENERAL CURRENT $32,259 $26,557 $33,495 $32,618 $34,147 $34,811 0381000 43 1083 CASH BOND RECEIPTS -$2,316 -$79,796 -$42,208 $0 $0 $0 0381000 43 1090 NTA FEE GENERAL DELINQUEN $19,269 $27,584 $22,303 $24.264 $21.497 $21,497 0381000 43 1093 DRIVING SAFETY COURSE FEE $148,123 $124,317 $139,406 $145,087 $119,218 $120,000 0381000 43 1095 OPEN RECORDS REQUEST -$60 $0 $67 $80 $34 $100 0381000 43 1113 NISI CASH JUDGEMENT $61,365 $57,664 $49,572 $42,342 $129,315 $60,000 0381000 43 1922 COPYING COURT DOCUMENT $228 -$126 $225 $256 $485 $500 0381000 43 1942 TRAFFIC FINES CURRENT $1,480,974 $1,564,270 $1,805,135 $1,836,575 $1,710,202 $1.925,000 0381000 43 1962 COURT SERVICE FEE-10% $400,314 $447,826 $493,999 $489,297 $502,415 $510,974 0381000 43 1972 GENERAL FINES -CURRENT $498,376 $483,452 $487,380 $508,562 $418,843 $350,000 0381000 43 1982 APPEAL FEES $125 $238 $50 $80 $25 $50 0381000 43 2103 REIMBURSE MAGISTRATIVE CO $0 $28,163 $30,295 $32,132 $32,132 $34,080 TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES $9,799,334 $11,315,868 $12,063,547 $12,076,966 $12,549,485 $13,346,635 0134010 44 1012 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS $3,945,672 $2,785,085 $3,452,985 $3,755,000 $3,755,000 $4,283,431 0134010 44 1072 UNREALIZED GAIN ON INV $0 $725,543 -$1,002,715 $0 $0 $0 0134010 44 1123 INT ON GF INVESTMENT $126,545 $117.720 $135,969 $102.584 $102,584 $140,000 0134010 44 2113 CASA MANANA LEASE $1,200 $0 $0 $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 0801000 44 2263 CONCESSION RENTALS $595 $4,483 $749 $5,000 $0 $0 0808080 44 2273 CONCESSION -ATHLETIC FIELD $2,000 $2,043 $3,061 $18,917 $6,987 $6,987 0807080 44 2293 AUDITORIUM RENTAL $20,794 $20,550 $32,800 $29,875 $25,709 $25,709 0801000 44 2303 BRADLEY CENTER RENTAL $1,646 $2,045 $3,450 $2,000 $1,814 $1,814 0801000 44 2313 ADMISSIONS $0 $1,935 $2,016 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 0028010 44 2323 INTERNATIONAL CENTER RENT $0 $9,744 $19,826 $17,169 $17,169 $17,169 0252000 44 3022 MONTHLY PARKING $0 $88,142 $123,253 $157,000 $115,347 $120,000 0252000 44 3042 DAILY PARKING $0 $681,005 $631,430 $945,960 $664,551 $664,551 0252000 44 3052 CONTRACT PARKING $0 $41,646 $9,453 $13,478 $10,186 $10,186 0204003 44 3200 REIMS.-SIGNAL REPAIR $0 $6,096 $21,173 $20,000 $53,244 $53,244 0251000 44 3303 MONCRIEF BLDG RENTALS $37,772 $32,556 $43.420 $54,513 $54,513 $54,513 0251000 44 3313 AUDITORIUM RENTAL-W.R.M.0 $76,319 $63,369 $65,687 $76,831 $50,271 $50,271 0251000 44 3323 COLISEUM RENTAL-W.R.M.C. $189,159 $202,780 $151,513 $179.363 $157,467 $163,655 0251000 44 3333 COMMERCIAL EXHIBIT BLDGS. $193,606 $222,135 $231,532 $213,885 $238,933 $246,570 0252000 44 3333 COMMERCIAL EXHIBIT BLDGS. $0 $1,292,750 $1,407.981 $1,529,550 $1,571,954 $1,600,000 0251000 44 3343 EQUESTRIAN CENTER $475,581 $530,381 $384,514 $463.500 $556,769 $600,000 0251000 44 3353 OTHER LIVESTOCK BLDGS.REN $32,563 $19,546 $34,476 $22,812 $46,309 $55,000 0251000 44 3363 STOCK SHOW RECEIPTS $10,160 $10,000 $10,000 $10,300 $10,000 $10,000 0251000 44 3373 CONCESSIONS - WRMC $528,569 $426,011 $471,365 $511,575 $480,393 $489,593 0252000 44 3373 CONCESSIONS - WRMC $0 $589,876 $419,837 $642,000 $542,054 $542.054 0251000 44 3383 ROUND -UP INN RENTAL-W.R.M $105,259 $91,543 $78,479 $102,599 $102,599 $102,599 0251000 44 3393 RECOVERY OF LABOR EXPENSE $539,684 $589,228 $570,972 $617,398 $581,342 $591,899 0252000 44 3393 RECOVERY OF LABOR EXPENSE $0 $82,390 $96,765 $112,000 $82,029 $82,029 0251000 44 3403 RECOVERY OF SUPPLIES EXPE $378,876 $420,287 $400,269 $400,000 $361,805 $361,805 0251000 44 3413 RECOVERY OF UTILITIES EXPE $156,221 $139.640 $136,908 $160.704 $138,916 $140,952 0251000 44 3423 RECOVERY OF OTHER SERVICE $43,551 $64,298 $70,003 $84,495 $66,871 $66,871 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES F-11 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNTIREVENUE SOURCE 1996.97 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 0251000 44 3443 MISC REVENUE - WRMC $41,300 $23,099 $1,632 $49,452 $41,851 $41,851 0252000 44 3443 MISC REVENUE - WRMC $0 $3,108 $9,656 $11,200 $48,032 $48,032 0252000 44 3463 MISC. REV. COWTOWN COLISE $0 $26,848 $15,052 $41,000 $41,000 $41,000 0252000 44 3473 UTILITY CHARGES REVENUE $0 $104,194 $38,952 $51,000 $18,213 $18,213 0251000 44 3474 RV PARKING REVENUE $53,514 $56,946 $53,143 $86,271 $67,154 $67,154 0252000 44 3483 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES -RE $0 $70,326 $32,175 $0 $6,243 $6,243 0251000 44 3863 CATERING REVENUE $96,237 $94,730 $99.941 $152,406 $58,724 $58,724 0252000 44 3863 CATERING REVENUE $0 $64,462 $125,811 $61,000 $97,002 $97,002 0214002 44 4513 SALE OF JUNKED VEHICLES $0 $1,459 $2,519 $0 $864 $864 0134010 44 4533 SALE OF SURPLUS STREETS & $10,924 $38,773 $111,969 $0 $9,072 $9,072 0133000 44 4543 AUCTION REVENUE $0 $351,872 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 0351000 44 4543 AUCTION REVENUE $0 $0 $5 $0 $806 $806 0133000 44 4553 SALVAGE REV (AUCTION) $263,538 $2,934 $283.460 $101,000 $101,000 $101,000 0353303 44 4563 SALE OF ABANDONED P'ROPERT $15,540 $7,020 $37,490 $57,240 $57,240 $57,240 0353303 44 4952 SALE OF ABANDONED VEHICLE $602,437 $786,107 $932.365 $927,448 $908,486 $908,486 0353302 44 4953 ABANDONED FUNDS $44,821 $24,583 $60,718 $47,058 $4,975 $4,975 TOTAL USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY $7,996,605 $10,939,647 $9,812.059 $11,837,783 $11,258,677 $11,944,764 0134010 45 1236 INFRASTRUCTURE SHARING $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 $130,000 0361010 45 1583 EMERG MGMT MATCHING FDS R $152,750 $107,434 $138.165 $130,000 $156,510 $156,510 0121000 45 1603 REVENUE FROM D F W ASSIST $20,834 $172,555 $126,756 $156,510 $60,900 $60.900 0361010 45 1613 EMERG MGMT REV-TARRA $67,494 $66,722 $67.266 $60,900 $0 $60,900 0805010 45 1623 ZOO ASSN. PAYMENT $321,063 $184,141 $12,483 $0 $509,991 $0 0132000 45 1693 REIMB INDIRECT COSTS $489,894 $451,856 $510,404 $464,693 $256,836 $256,836 0501000 45 1743 TARRANT CO -HEALTH CT $119,119 $120,521 $257,136 $256,836 $17,203 $17,203 0132000 45 1823 REV FROM FRINGE BENEFITS $39,673 $38,204 $37,640 $38,458 $821 $821 0204002 45 1833 SIGN & MARKING FEES $3,487 $1,215 $3,717 $9,145 $40 $40 0800500 45 1903 E-WISE PROGRAM $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,284 $32,284 TOTAL REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES $1,260,634 $1,142,648 $1,153,567 $1,116,542 $1,164,585 $715,494 0134010 46 10241 S REMOTE ACCESS FEE $7,955 $10,085 $7,649 $0 $4,116 $4,116 0381000 46 1024 I S REMOTE ACCESS FEE $0 $3,745 $2,140 $1,467 $2,991 $2,991 0134010 46 1644 SERVICES TO AMERICAN AIRL $3,750 $12,500 $15.827 $15,000 $0 $0 0121000 46 1047 PWD COURT COSTS $32,035 $0 $140 $0 $0 $0 0065000 46 1080 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FEES $96,866 $88,959 $74,208 $87,300 $62.652 $74,208 0065000 46 1090 ZONING COMMISSION FEES $154,429 $186,719 $173,048 $194,319 $135,732 $135,732 0132000 46 1094 WATER ❑EPT.ADMN.CHARGE $2,203,612 $2,362,594 $2.483,506 $2,400.000 $2.400,000 $2,638,960 0132000 46 1144 CABLE FUND ADMIN CHARGE $33,717 $48,029 $41,349 $413,029 $57,874 $60,764 0121000 46 1154 REVENUE FOR DOCUMENT REPR $0 $0 $0 $300 $0 $0 0111000 46 1164 SALE OF CITY CODES $305 $95 $45 $250 $0 $0 0062000 46 1184 DEV PROC MANUAL $0 $5,600 $4,900 $5,800 $6,226 $7,912 0221000 46 1194 SALE OF MAPSIPUBLICATIONS $839 $972 $560 $750 $350 $500 0221000 46 12.14 PLANS/PUBLICATIONS $454 $17 $284 $400 $1,767 $2,000 0111000 46 1274 FILING FEES $900 $300 $1,300 $1,300 $0 $0 0111000 46 1304 SALE OF PROCLAMATIONS $103 $60 $155 $100 $103 $100 W32000 46 1883 RAILTRANS ADM. CHG. $14,247 $7,183 $18,816 $18,817 $0 $0 0132000 46 1893 GOLF COURSE ADM CHG $318,779 $242,493 $203,567 $204,000 $204,000 $302,575 0065000 46 1903 PLANNING COMMISSION FEES $204,823 $238,520 $274,803 $275,000 $265,097 $265,097 0132000 46 1913 PARKING BLDG ADM CHG $45,080 $25,705 $25,704 $25.705 $25,705 $20,509 0132000 46 1923 SOLID WASTE ADMIN CHG $295,866 $81,101 $92,925 $93,000 $227,525 $392,493 0132000 46 1963 REVENUE FROM PAYROLL SERV $63,626 $67,408 $68,969 $74,000 $70,688 $70,688 0132000 46 1983 ADM CHG RETIREMENT $24,999 $24,999 $24,555 $25.000 $25,000 $17,206 0134010 46 1993 TITLE FEES $110 $265 $433 $0 $0 $0 0028010 46 1995 INTERNATIONAL CENTER DUES $0 -$2,120 $500 $0 $0 $0 0201001 46 2124 LICENSE FEES $82,650 $84,625 $79,300 $82,400 $104,081 $136,607 0214002 46 2220 APARTMENT INSPECTION FEE $255,484 $319,302 $299,433 $412,362 $348,749 $406,186 0362000 46 2252 FIRE ALARM SYS REGIS $280,131 $324,400 $406,082 $445,994 $292,610 $300,845 0504001 46 2290 DOG KENNEL FEES $5,900 $10.336 $12,926 $6,000 $47,089 $30,000 0062000 46 2304 BUILDING PERMITS $3,395,250 $4,239,381 $4,286,569 $4,333,481 $3,833,481 $3,500,000 0062000 46 2314 ORDINANCE INSPECTIONS $185,424 $308,255 $296,845 $323.780 $209,674 $210.000 0062000 46 2324 COMM FACILITY AGREEMENT $14,500 $3,605 -$3,388 $0 $103 $0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET F-12 STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNTIREVENUE SOURCE 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 1999.00 2000-01 0065000 46 2324 COMMUNITY FACILITY AGREEMENT $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $0 $0 0201000 46 2324 COMM FACILITY AGREEMENT $0 $9,000 $18,500 $20,000 $14,571 $15,000 0062000 46 2334 ELECTRICAL PERMITS $246,192 $292,052 $312,473 $324,623 $328,021 $344,343 0361000 46 2342 FIRE SVC-BENBROOK $153,449 $167,398 $153,826 $163.544 $197,890 $197,890 0062000 46 2344 ANNEXATION FEES $2,595 $2,161 $4,064 $4,970 $2,434 $2,434 0062000 46 2345 BILLBOARD REGISTRATION $375 $61,200 $3,935 $5,500 $1,414 $1,414 0062000 46 2354 ENCROACHMENT LETTERS $478 $1,960 $3,665 $3,315 $1,217 $1,217 0062000 46 2364 MECHANICAL PERMITS $111,854 $118,397 $138,290 $125,021 $160,642 $186,606 0214002 46 2374 SECURING VACANT STRUCTURE $6,230 $6,415 $20,019 $15.000 $38,611 $38,611 0214002 46 2376 PENALTY SECURE VAC STRUT $0 $0 $2,210 $210 $37,717 $37,717 0062000 46 2384 PLUMBING PERMITS $152,259 $157,820 $177.388 $180,310 $237,394 $237,394 0062000 46 2394 EXAMINATION FEES $445 $298 $487 $747 $94 $94 0062000 46 2404 SIGN PERMITS $142,402 $92,630 $91,943 $108,997 $75,158 $75,158 0504002 46 2415 IMPOUNDMENT $0 $9,025 $51,486 $60,000 $46,217 $46,217 0504002 46 2416 BOARDING $0 $2,464 $13.871 $15,000 $14,883 $14,883 0504002 46 2417 QUARANTINE $0 $1,872 $15,836 $15.000 $17,385 $19,085 0504001 46 2418 ADOPTIONS $0 -$14 $82 $0 -$24 $0 0504002 46 2418 ADOPTIONS $0 $2,047 $12,459 $12,500 $14,998 $18,055 0504001 46 2424 ANIMAL HEAD SHIPPING FEE $1,088 $1,200 $550 $500 $235 $500 0504002 46 2424 ANIMAL HEAD SHIPPING FEE $0 $0 $150 $150 $343 $300 0504001 46 2434 VETERINARY SERVICES $9,600 $15,888 $10.083 $11,600 $7,150 $10,000 0504002 46 2434 VETERINARY SERVICES $0 $0 $1,204 $1,204 $14,817 $10.000 0353102 46 2452 PERMIT FEE - BURGLAR ALAR $91,945 $92,050 $162,160 $161,325 $188,000 $200.000 0062000 46 2454 REBID REMODEL. CONT $40,000 $45,675 $39,225 $45,675 $37,274 $37.274 0353102 46 2462 SVC CHARGE - BURGLAR ALAR $195,035 $247,092 $82,145 $219,564 $219,564 $219,564 0353102 46 2482 RESIDENTIAL PERMIT FEE $268,203 $295,671 $288.002 $289,834 $357,017 $357,017 0353102 46 2492 RESIDENTIAL SERVICE CHARG $46,306 $51,140 $21.054 $47,305 $20,337 $20,337 0062000 46 2494 BOARD APPEALS - CFPBOA $4,410 $3,650 $3,260 $4,760 $1,817 $1,817 0062000 46 2504 CONST CODE BOOK SALES $10,010 $5,043 $19,196 $20,570 $8,031 $8,031 0353300 46 2514 SALE OF ACCIDENT REP $178,039 $161,093 $154,363 $173,725 $153,058 $153,058 0353400 46 2524 CRIME LABORATORY SERVICE $10,664 $9,751 $8,746 $23,351 $3,334 $3,334 0353303 46 2544 WRECKER AUTHORIZATIONS FE $440 $240 $120 $500 $0 $0 0353303 46 2564 VEHICLE POUND IMPOUNDMENT $113,140 $117,110 $116,900 $132,592 $106,080 $115,000 0362000 46 2574 FIRE INSPECTION FEES $296,133 $269,491 $289,701 $270,000 $330,294 $350,000 0356100 46 2584 POLYGRAM EXAM FEE $1,300 $1,700 $0 $400 $1,029 $1,100 0062000 46 2600 MOBILE HOME ORD INSP $14,200 $15,805 $14,905 $20,055 $13,260 $15,000 0062000 46 2601 REINSPECTION FEES $28,265 $35.392 $42,002 $45,759 $2.6,019 $30,000 0062000 46 2602 DOUBLE PERMIT FEE $7,646 $10,433 $6,368 $7,921 $4,137 $4,137 0062000 46 2603 AFTER HOURS FEE $240 $5,640 $250 $5,000 $0 $0 0361000 46 2604 FIRE SVC-WESTOVER HI $98,411 $98,411 $127,330 $104,886 $73,334 $73.334 0353303 46 2614 VEHICLE POUND STORAGE FEE $401,074 $566,274 $585,301 $575,590 $580,282 $590,000 0353303 46 2624 VECHICLE POUND TOWAGE FEE $626,363 $780.718 $773,671 $780,869 $710,991 $780,869 0353303 46 2634 PROCEEDS FROM BICYCLE AUC $9,332 $4,890 $4,430 $4,000 $5,871 $5,871 0381000 46 2644 ADM FEES-$1010FFENSE $98,795 $103,238 $104.816 $112,692 $83,143 $83,143 0381000 46 2654 ADM FEES -TEEN COURT $19.542 $29,116 $31.499 $31,347 $33,996 $33,996 0353303 46 2664 NOTIFICATION FEE $7,707 $17,211 $22,769 $23.385 $20,366 $20,366 0503002 46 4204 POOL OPERATOR'S COURSE $7,245 $7,733 $10,350 $11,340 $2,854 $2,854 0505000 46 4674 VITAL STATISTICS FEES $603,762 $639,533 $671,037 $735,000 $721,574 $735,000 0503002 46 4704 HEALTH CARD FEE $103,326 $136,152 $219,632 $173,107 $431,641 $450,000 0503002 46 4774 PLAN REVIEW FEE $50,585 $51,927 $51,239 $51,040 $54,792 $58,591 0503002 46 4884 MSC REVENUE $821 $813 $1,230 $1,000 $1,82.2 $2,698 0504001 46 4884 MISC REVENUE $156 $286 $130 $170 $17 $0 0501603 46 4894 STD CLINIC CHGS $10,544 $406 $0 $0 $0 $0 0214002 46 4924 WEED CUTTING FEES $303,601 $375,917 $530,832 $436,675 $546,1139 $561,989 0214002 46 4934 WEED CUTTING PENALTIES $28,202 $34,543 $69,041 $58,351 $100,183 $145,370 0503002 46 4984 TEMPORARY HEALTH PERMIT $411,865 $40,525 $50,975 $58,780 $64,232 `y70,000 0800504 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $1,754 $2,567 $2,915 $3,400 $2,371 $2,371 0800509 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $387 $442 $610 $792 $696 $696 0807023 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $786 $1,245 $1,667 $1,955 $1,239 $1,239 0807032 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $1,644 $1,816 $2,490 $3,200 $2,102 $2,102 0807039 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $0 $0 $0 $75 $0 $0 0808022 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $0 $2,378 $4,001 $4,984 $3,461 $3,461 0808026 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $1,716 $1,950 $1,846 $2,400 $1,327 $1,327 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES F-13 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNTIREVENUE SOURCE 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999.00 1999-00 2000-01 0808035 46 5225 VENDING COMMISSION $2,430 $3,109 $4,067 $4,700 $3,002 $3,002 0800504 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $465 $350 $987 $2,071 $694 $694 0800509 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $215 $320 $200 $400 $291 $300 0807022 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $620 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0807023 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $135 $80 $325 $100 $129 $150 0807027 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $0 $0 $0 $120 -$86 $100 0807028 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $915 $550 $262 $380 $1,318 $1,318 0807029 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $0 $180 $400 $75 $300 $300 0807032 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $118 $406 $675 $400 $2,654 $2,654 0807033 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $0 $4,269 $5,578 $4,122 $3,871 $3,871 0807038 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $0 $6,884 $5,818 $6,100 $4,212 $4,212 0807039 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $0 $7,367 $1,056 $1,000 $1,414 $1,414 0808022 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $75 $1,814 $1,045 $1,150 $5,607 $5,607 0808026 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $649 $180 $245 $260 $101 $101 0808028 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $0 $190 $225 $200 $300 $300 0808029 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $605 $650 $614 $240 $339 $339 0808035 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $742 $595 $645 $5,950 $813 $813 0808036 46 5235 RENTAL, FEES $737 $1,345 $2,395 $1,945 $1,032 $1,032 0808038 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $410 $730 $525 $1,217 $485 $485 0808039 46 5235 RENTAL FEES $0 $0 $50 $120 $0 $0 0800504 46 5245 CUSTODIAL FEES $300 $390 $312 $1,121 $0 $0 0800509 46 5245 CUSTODIAL FEES $560 $265 $135 $240 $283 $283 0807023 46 5245 CUSTODIAL FEES $50 $80 $0 $60 $0 $0 0807032 46 5245 CUSTODIAL_ FEES $166 $0 $331 $200 $0 $0 0808022 46 5245 CUSTODIAL FEES $0 $50 $50 $125 $0 $0 0808026 46 5245 CUSTODIAL FEES $30 $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 0808035 46 5245 CUSTODIAL FEES $655 $40 $0 $0 $0 $0 0800504 46 5255 MO AGENCY RENTAL $17,292 $17,310 $17,292 $17,292 $14,165 $14,165 0807022 46 5255 MO AGENCY RENTAL $13,745 $12,892 $12,910 $12,910 $11,066 $11,066 0807023 46 5255 MO AGENCY RENTAL $4,764 $4,764 $4,764 $4,764 $4,083 $4,083 0807032 46 5255 MO AGENCY RENTAL $3,974 $3,974 $3,974 $3,974 $3,406 $3,406 0808022 46 5255 MO AGENCY RENTAL $3,173 $4,003 $4,008 $4,000 $3,435 $3,435 0808026 46 5255 MO AGENCY RENTAL $4,276 $4,276 $4,276 $4,274 $3,665 $3,665 0808035 46 5255 MO AGENCY RENTAL $4,344 $4,344 $4,344 $4,344 $4,380 $4,380 0801000 46 6162 PUTTING COURSE $51,450 $60,777 $54,660 $60,000 $70,762 $80.000 0807027 46 6406 REGISTRATION $0 $0 $0 $300 $0 $0 0807028 46 6406 REGISTRATION $360 $245 $2,973 $1,824 $12,087 $12,087 0807029 46 6406 REGISTRATION $1,613 $120 $0 $100 $0 $0 0807038 46 6406 REGISTRATION $74 $339 $0 $100 $0 $0 0807039 46 6406 REGISTRATION $535 $1,038 $0 $500 $0 $0 0808022 46 6406 REGISTRATION $0 $0 $4 $4,000 $0 $0 0808027 46 6406 REGISTRATION $140 $124 $0 $100 $0 $0 0808029 46 6406 REGISTRATION $290 $150 $20 $25 $400 $0 0808036 46 G406 REGISTRATION $1,254 $280 $393 $500 $117 $0 0808038 4G 6406 REGISTRATION $0 $0 $85 $0 $459 $0 0808027 46 6436 CERAMICS $275 $203 $70 $161 $0 $0 0808029 46 6436 CERAMICS $12 $20 $0 $25 $0 $0 0808036 46 6436 CERAMICS $62 $617 $270 $761 $145 $100 0808090 46 6675 NATURE CENTER ENTRY FEES $5,276 $5,534 $5,079 $5,028 $5,872 $6,000 0801000 46 6685 POLE BANNERS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0801000 46 6705 FESTIVAL EQUIPMENT $8,505 $5,959 $3,244 $6,000 $524 $6,000 0801000 46 6715 SITE RESERVATIONS $29,369 $25,238 $42,335 $32,790 $72,096 $72,096 0808070 46 6735 SWIMMING POOLS FEES $54,708 $59.275 $50,293 $55,575 $34,818 $34,818 0808080 46 6745 ACTIVITY FEES -ATHLETICS $89,205 $163,489 $209,648 $212,797 $234,989 $263,391 0807090 46 6775 LCV ADMISSIONS $44,868 $44,629 $50,966 $48,991 $52,266 $53,599 0807027 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTRUCTOR $0 $0 $0 $375 $0 $0 0807028 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $6,996 $7,927 $6,399 $8,995 $3,106 $7,000 0807029 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $3,424 $2,509 $2,821 $3,000 $6,149 $3,000 0807032 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $0 $0 $58 $0 $580 $0 0807033 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $0 $0 $1,119 $600 $51 $0 0807038 46 6780 1ONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $3,330 $1,541 $2,094 $3,684 $1,213 $1,213 0807039 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $6,334 $7,743 $11,016 $17,533 $12,468 $14,110 0808029 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $2,449 $2,440 $1,509 $1,899 $2,048 $2,780 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET F-14 STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNT/REVENUE SOURCE 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999.00 2000-01 0808036 46 6780 CONTRACT INSTR REVENUE $3,407 $6,060 $5,105 $6,600 $1,692 $5,000 0807023 46 6790 I. D. CARDS $0 $66 $244 $50 $0 $0 0807027 46 6790 ID CARDS $0 $0 $2 $200 $0 $0 0807028 46 6790 1. D. CARDS $1,464 $668 $600 $450 $692 $692 0807029 46 6790 I. D. CARDS $638 $340 $220 $375 $254 $254 0807032 46 6790 I. D. CARDS $190 $354 $1,144 $668 $1,621 $1,621 0807033 46 67901. D. CARDS $264 $182 $704 $254 $1.553 $1,553 0807038 46 67901, D, CARDS $1,040 $1.622 $1,966 $2,701 $1,319 $1,319 0807039 46 67901. D. CARDS $1,632 $2,034 $2,054 $1,670 $2,944 $2.944 0808022 46 67901. D. CARDS $136 $148 $158 $259 $1,132 $1,132 0808027 46 67901. D. CARDS $165 $356 $0 $340 $0 $0 0808028 46 67901. D. CARDS $116 $38 $76 $100 $0 $0 OB08029 46 67901. D. CARDS $1,696 $1,178 $806 $1,034 $423 $423 0808035 46 67901. D. CARDS $332 $256 $166 $150 $415 $415 0808036 46 67901. D. CARDS $908 $1,487 $548 $900 $3,147 $3,147 0808038 46 67901. D. CARDS $169 $811 $52 $346 $0 $0 0808039 46 6790 I. D. CARDS $340 $274 $474 $1,071 $1,808 $1,806 0808080 46 67901. D. CARDS $1,820 $1.299 $1,100 $1.155 $1,394 $1,394 0807090 46 6795 LCV SOUVENIR SALES $11,439 $12.227 $13,431 $14,433 $12.345 $12.345 0807090 46 6805 PHOTO FEE 3600 $1,000 $0 $500 $0 $0 0801000 46 6835 MISC, PARK REVENUE $2,261 $2,843 $2,668 $2,000 $0 $0 0807090 46 6845 CORNMEAL SALES $496 $742 $1,025 $903 $1,213 $1.213 0804080 46 6855 LEASE INCOME TENNIS OPER $3,999 $3,666 $4,279 $4.000 $6,881 $6.881 0807021 46 6905 CONCESSIONIHERITAGE PARK $571 $323 $358 $332 $0 $0 0801000 46 6955 PHOTOGRAPHY FEES $1.200 $1,987 $400 $361 $3,576 $3,576 0842002 46 7016 MICRO -COMPUTER REVENUE $669 $318 $15 $0 $0 $0 0844001 46 7016 MICRO -COMPUTER REVENUE $11 $12 $60 $60 $251 $251 0841000 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $31 $720 $2,610 $3,282 $622 $622 0842002 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $7,497 $5,563 $6,986 $8,125 $7,992 $7,992 0843001 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $1,618 $1,414 $1,059 $1.200 $1,009 $1,009 0843002 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $774 $1,068 $808 $850 $1,161 $1,161 0843003 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $694 $902 $598 $650 $1,495 $1,495 0843004 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $446 $551 $645 $800 $680 $680 0843005 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $773 $1,221 $1,414 $1,400 $2.213 $2,213 0843006 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $365 $515 $742 $650 $2.610 $2,610 0843007 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $741 $1,038 $683 $875 $1.161 $1,161 0843008 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $83 $124 $190 $175 $436 $436 0843009 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $41 $95 $176 $150 $618 $618 0844001 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $3,596 $1,447 $1,130 $2,000 $1,775 $1,775 0844002 46 7026 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $4,923 $6,106 $6,223 $6,500 $6,726 $6,726 0842002 46 7036 RETRIVAL FEES $823 $2,244 $1,100 $1,909 $0 $0 0844001 46 7036 RETRIVAL FEES $17 $11 $112 $100 $452 $452 0801000 45 7825 TRAIN CONCESSIONS $7,688 $9,543 $33,390 $104.808 $49,705 $55,000 0801000 46 7835 TRAIN RIDE TICKET SALES $34,020 $26,834 $9,415 $34,680 $9,498 $9,498 0841000 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $257 $0 $119 $0 $317 $317 0842002 45 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $81.603 $80,333 $74,246 $102,410 $67,666 $75,000 0843001 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $24,397 $23.870 $21,225 $23,000 $20,412 $22,000 0843002 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $14,002 $11,100 $9.461 $12,000 $9.928 $10,000 0843003 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $10,417 $10,880 $9,494 $10,582 $10.139 $10,500 0843004 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $7,533 $7,202 $6.690 $7,500 $6.764 $7,000 0843005 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $13,292 $11,968 $12,606 $14,000 $12,748 $13,000 0643006 46 7855 OVERDUE GOOK CHARGES $5,343 $5,288 $5,387 $5,500 $8,937 $8,937 0843007 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $26,343 $24,570 $21,339 $25,000 $20,554 $25,000 0843008 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $2,581 $2,767 $2,277 $2,500 $2,909 $2,909 0843009 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $8,700 $8,654 $8.902 $9,500 $8,555 $8,555 0844001 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $82,012 $84,389 $81,292 $87,624 $83,893 $B5,000 0844002 46 7855 OVERDUE BOOK CHARGES $31,567 $37,981 $35,947 $38,000 $39,009 $40,000 0841000 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS -$772 -$824 -$397 $0 -$193 $0 0842002 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $12,639 $10,030 $10,507 $111,500 $7.488 $7,488 0843001 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $2,828 $2,447 $2,310 $13,931 $1,974 $1,974 0843002 46 7875 LOST BOOT( PAYMENTS $1,372 $1,215 $891 $1,000 $1,346 $1,346 0843003 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $960 $1,043 $1.206 $1,575 $1,564 $1,564 0843004 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $589 $558 $256 $450 $320 $320 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES F-15 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNTIREVENUE SOURCE 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 0843005 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $1,434 $1,087 $1,266 $1,500 $2,117 $2,117 0843006 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $477 $351 $305 $275 $570 $570 0843007 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $2,462 $2,476 $2,204 $2,200 $2,344 $2,344 0843008 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $186 $254 $324 $450 $463 $463 0843009 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $1,235 $794 $667 $500 $1,272 $1,272 0844001 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $6,251 $5,993 $5,289 $5,435 $6,000 $6,000 0844002 46 7875 LOST BOOK PAYMENTS $2,490 $2,517 $3,125 $3,599 $3,084 $3,084 0841000 46 7895 COPY MACHINE FEES $22,443 $20,580 $9,145 $26,000 $122 $122 0841000 46 7925 BOOK SALE REVENUE $1,807 $2,964 $1,777 $3,500 $1,091 $1,091 0841000 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $0 $0 $4 $0 $2 $2 0842002 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $296 $324 $300 $402 $194 $194 0843001 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $255 $240 $292 $350 $174 $174 0843002 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $116 $155 $130 $191 $133 $133 0843003 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $82 $93 $59 $75 $46 $46 0843004 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $34 $18 $26 $30 $22 $22 0843005 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $84 $47 $55 $100 $126 $126 0843006 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $29 $24 $9 $25 $10 $10 0843007 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $439 $420 $346 $404 $307 $307 0843008 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $19 $17 $5 $25 $8 $8 0843009 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $17 $64 $61 $50 $45 $45 0844001 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $472 $615 $484 $592 $526 $526 0844002 46 7945 MATERIALS RESERVATION CHA $243 $222 $300 $400 $208 $208 OB42002 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $11,324 $11,456 $8,949 $12,788 $7,475 $7,475 0843001 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $685 $642 $583 $665 $858 $858 0843002 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $105 $100 $180 $200 $100 $100 0843003 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $240 $155 $80 $100 $40 $40 0843004 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $135 $60 $100 $50 $250 $250 0843005 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $450 $395 $470 $650 $218 $218 0843006 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $190 $160 $105 $175 $43 $43 0843007 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $105 $1,642 $1,385 $1,250 $1,004 $1,004 0843008 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $5 $120 $15 $25 $23 $23 0843009 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $125 $175 $125 $164 $175 $175 0844001 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $8,061 $8,561 $7,576 $0,000 $8,004 $8,004 0844002 46 7955 OUT -OF -COUNTY FEE $380 $730 $845 $900 $689 $689 0842002 46 7960 MEETING ROOM RENTAL $1,462 $1,034 $735 $1,028 $470 $470 0843009 46 7960 MEETING ROOM RENTAL $105 $0 $35 $50 $0 $0 0844001 46 7960 MEETING ROOM RENTAL $2,175 $1,193 $2,326 $3,237 $437 $437 0844002 46 7960 MEETING ROOM RENTAL $2,252 $582 $580 $500 $1,413 $1,413 0842002 46 7975 MICROFICHE COPIER REVENUE $4,288 $7,254 $5,821 $7,585 $2,927 $2,927 0844001 46 7975 MICROFICHE COPIER REVENUE $655 $406 $1,181 $800 $5,939 $5,939 TOTAL SERVICE CHARGES $13,762,367 $15,419,718 $15,430,403 $16,002,264 $15,513,697 $16,113,977 0205002 47 1001 IDB LABOR - NON-GEN FD $58,915 $43,144 $40,741 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 0131010 47 2004 TRANSFERS FM GG04 $0 $0 $781,802 $971,807 $971,807 $971,807 0385000 47 2070 XFER FR LAKE WORTH TST FD $252,853 $235,857 $294,041 $294,041 $294,041 $346,120 0150000 47 2071 XFERS FM SELF INSURANCE F $371,962 $1,083,955 $234,102 $0 $139,217 $139,217 0807080 47 2071 XFERS FM SELF INSURANCE F $16,995 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0381000 47 2072 XFERS FM SECURITY FUND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $136,050 0384000 47 2072 XFERS FM SECURITY FUND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,200 0132010 47 2079 XFERS FM CRIME DIST FUND $230,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0351000 47 2079 XFERS FM CRIME DIST FUND $5,388,272 $5,205,297 $6,141,297 $6,734,297 $6,734,297 $6,906,985 0842001 47 2088 TRANSFERS IN FM FE88 $0 $106,689 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 0132000 47 2136 TRSFER FROM OFFICE SVC $140,874 $140,874 $140,875 $140,875 $140.875 $257,094 TOTAL TRANSFERS $7,846,338 $8,497,234 $7,672,850 $8,168,020 $0,307,237 $9,099,473 0111000 48 1030 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $782 $252 $501 $413 $132 $i32 0150000 48 1100 SUBROGATION REVENUE $39,997 $16,422 $39,681 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 0150000 48 1110 WORKER'S COMP REIMBURSEME $17,344 $21,587 $23,298 $23,885 $19,855 $19,855 0381000 48 1132 CITATION LISTING FEES $6,717 $8,638 $7,959 $9,000 $5,186 $5,186 0381000 48 1133 JURY FEE REVENUE $288 $190 $5 $0 $5 $5 0201000 48 1152 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $2,276 $3,160 $1,201 $108,000 $3,344 $3,344 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET F-16 STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED Center ACCOUNT/REVENUE SOURCE 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 0361000 48 1272 MISC REVENUE $1,393 $74,335 $5,842 $8,456 $3,029 $3,029 0362000 48 1282 FEE:FIRE REPORTS & MISC R $378 $950 $1,362 $1,135 $3,230 $3,230 0381000 48 1286 UNIDENTIFIED COURT RECEIP $2,418 $816 $767 $941 $1,677 $1,677 0028010 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $0 $0 $11,747 $15,429 $20,000 0062000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $9,512 $11,013 $14,269 $20,000 $15,195 $33,214 0132010 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $77,704 $15,650 $87 $7,998 $10,000 0134010 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $502.301 $328,970 $330.320 $300,000 $1,026,768 $300,000 0134020 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $178,361 -$1,999 $163 $63,000 $99,313 $63,000 0141000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $184 $153 $254 $30 $264 0221000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $649 $1,298 $487 $835 $1,110 $835 0351000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $1,406 $26 $45 $0 $45 03BI000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $0 $20 $0 $6,014 $0 0501000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $157,566 $792 $592 $915 $592 0521000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $5,167 $22,886 $2,541 $3.619 $5,345 $3.619 0523000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $0 $750 $0 $6,000 $0 0800500 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $25,599 $12,635 $21,662 $21,652 $21,662 0801000 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $9,054 $10.474 $58,488 $28,060 $28,060 $28,060 0807080 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $0 $0 $17,500 $17,500 $17,500 0807090 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0808038 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $0 $116 $0 $0 $0 0808080 48 1306 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $0 $0 $25,000 $26,000 $0 $0 0132000 48 1326 OPEN RECORDS REVENUE $12,W9 $7,062 $5,344 $0 $2,126 $4.251 0071000 48 1356 HRC BANQUET REVENUE $200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0132000 48 1366 RETURNED CK PROCESSING CH $8,012 $8,453 $10,086 $10,716 $6,732 $10,000 0381000 48 1366 RETURNED CK PROCESSING CH $125 $50 $50 $100 $686 $500 0132000 48 1376 RECOVERY OF P1Y OPERATING $1,710 $4,548 $176 $1.000 $0 $0 0521000 48 1396 ENVIRON AUDIT INFORMATION $3.133 $10,456 $2,201 $4,000 $1.126 $15,446 0080100 48 1406 RECOVERY OF C/Y OPERATING $42,667 $44,245 $42.895 $0 $0 $0 0121000 48 1406 RECOVERY OF C/Y OPERATING $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 0134010 48 1406 RECOVERY OF C/Y OPERATING $0 $0 $4,550 $0 $0 $0 0351000 48 1432 CRIMINAL RESTITUTION $22,990 $23,290 $20,335 $23,523 $11,429 $20,000 0351000 48 1534 SECONDARY EMPLOYMENT FEE $5,600 $5,700 $3,800 $6,514 $4,800 $0 0353303 48 1836 AUTO SCRAP METAL SALES $5,623 $4,587 $2,692 $3.000 $2,390 $3,000 0204002 48 1853 REVENUE FOR SIGNS $0 $0 $0 $10.000 $0 $0 0351000 48 1853 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $54,945 $7,454 $7,279 $16,000 $12,869 $12,859 0352500 48 1853 REIMBURSEMENT FROM FWPOA $0 $0 $0 $44,928 $0 $0 0065000 48 1896 MAP SALE REVENUE $2.654 $2,511 $670 $2,000 $1,623 $2,870 0132000 48 1906 REV FOR PAY$ PROGRAM $5,406 $6,603 $30,000 $20,000 $30,043 $60,086 0801000 48 1956 MAINTENANCE SERVICES $21,229 $0 $22,260 $24,000 $0 $0 0028010 48 8100 CONTRIBUTIONS $0 $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES $1,089,284 $944,065 $765,364 $867,680 $1,436,620 $739,271 TOTAL REVENUES $278,230,040 $295,978,702 $305,766,433 $322,794,748 $325,401,478 $344,357,610 USE OF FUND BALANCE $0 Lo $0 $1.059.630 $00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $278,230,040 $295,978,702 $305,766,433 $323,854,378 $325,401,478 $344,357,610 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL, BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER GENERAL FUND 0001 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The General Fund is the City's ad valorem tax supported operating fund. The ad valorem tax is responsible for approximately 47.87 percent of General Fund receipts; other major sources of revenue are: the sales tax, street rental from local utilities, fines and forfeitures, parks and community services charges, library fees, building inspection fees, health permits and fees, return on the investment of General Fund monies, and licenses and permit fees. General Fund expenditures provide the following services: general administration and management, public safety, parks and community services, transportation and public works, planning and development, public health, public library and payment of debt service. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $187,007,020 $205,634,034 $219,627,485 $219,627,485 Supplies 12,702,605 11,434,215 12,934,890 12,934,890 Contractual Services 107,393,198 104,651,869 117,985,878 109,574,334 Capital Outlay 2,640,416 2,133,260 2,220,901 2,220,901 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $309,743,239 $323,854,378 $352,769,154 $344,357,610 Authorized Positions 3,738.88 3,879,10 3,935.30 3,935.30 F-'17 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET HOUSING DEPARTMENT BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1, 2000 - MAY 31, 2001 Allocation Carry -Over Total FUNDING SOURCES: This Period Balance Available GENERAL FUND $57,799 $0 $57,799 Sub -total General Fund $57,799 $0 $57,799 GRANT FUNDS Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $10,988,800 $0 $10,988,800 (611/1989 - until expended) HOME Funds 7,029,005 501,230 7,530,235 (5/18/1993 - 5/31/2004) Rental Rehabilitation Block Grant (RRBG) 229,815 0 229,815 (1981 -until expended) Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) 351,795 0 351,795 (4/1/2000 - 3/31/2001) Comprehensive Housing Counseling (CHC) 0 2,165 2,165 (10/1 /2000-9/30/2001) TOTAL ALL GRANT FUNDS $18,599,415 $503,395 $19,102,810 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Housing Finance Corporation (HFC) $655,876 $670,449 $1.326,325 Radisson Parking Revenues 77,497 12,500 89,997 Private Funding (CHC) 4,842 0 4,842 Sub -Total Other Funding Sources $738,215 $682.949 $1,421.164 TOTAL ALL FUNDING SOURCES $19.396,429 $1,186,344 $20,581,773 EXPENDITURES: Administrative Resources Personal $2,235,948 Supplies 40,853 Contractual 539,926 Capital 300 Sub -Total $2,817,027 Program Resources $16,578,489 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $19,395,516 APPROVED POSITIONS 45.45 G-1 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY G-3 DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER HOUSING GG01/0051010:0053010 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES As a primary contributor to the City's vision of providing strong neighborhoods, the Housing Department's mission is to develop and administer programs that preserve and expand the City's supply of decent, safe, affordable housing and to also stimulate neighborhood revitalization. These activities are funded by federal, state, and local sources. Services include, but are not limited to, acquisition, rehabilitation, new construction, emergency repair, weatherization, home purchase assistance, in -fill housing, and development activities. Current tools available to help revitalize inner-city neighborhoods are the Model Blocks Projects and the In -Fill Housing Program, The Model Blocks Project concentrates City activities and resources in selected neighborhoods in order to have a visible impact. It is designed to organize and empower neighborhoods so they may effectively identify issues and work toward solutions, promote public - private partnerships in the revitalization process, and offer integrated services to address the needs of individual neighborhoods. In addition to home repair activities, the program provides funding for infrastructure improvements and social services. Ten Model Blocks Projects are underway: the Historic Near Southeast, Jennings/May/Saint Louis, Como, the Near Northside, Fairmount, Polytechnic Heights, United Riverside, Mitchell Boulevard, and Far Greater Northside. The In -Fill Housing Program is designed to provide new single-family homes in target areas. The Housing Department is also involved in the development of single-family homes through the Fort Worth Housing Finance Corporation, and the replacement of existing homes that are too expensive to rehabilitate. The Housing Department continues to be involved in the development of new housing initiatives. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $0 $34,262 $31,303 $31,303 Supplies 487 724 790 790 Contractual Services 22,793 22,900 25,706 25,706 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $23,280 $57,886 $57,799 $57,799 Authorized Positions 0.00 0.45 0.40 0.40 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET r HOUSING GENERAL D "., (GRANT FUNDS 45.05) 1' Department management 1 DMINISTI ,ATlO A N 1' HOPE 31. Special projects 1 1 .40 A. P. �. Housing planning I 1 5.0 A. P.1 ®®®®®®®---- rrl : w r ^ ^ s r sir r r rr r- � ' ' 1 , , ' 'r r rr sa mani �r ®.�..® :®:ti .®�:.......:..®...::.::..:..,......:,.,.....,......® .®.:.®®®..®...:®:.:®.:::..:.....:..:®:�� � �®r ww sw s r ® SPECIAL PROJECTS UNIT 1 REHABILITATION AND 1 1 HOUSING SERVICES AND I OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT 1. j DEVELOPMENT DIVISION INFORMATION DIVISION j AND BUDGET Model Blocks j• I* 1 Applications processing Home Improvement Program 1• Closing cost assistance I • Budget development and 1• Cowtown BrushUp Program 1 19 Emergency Repair Program , I• First Time Homebuyers Program 1 I monitoring I R I• Weatherization Program I 1• Soft Second Mortgage Program for to Personnel services 1 1 1• Replacement Housing Program 1 first time homebuyers 1 l• Purchasing services 1 A. P®I I• In -Fill Housing Program I 1• Program marketing I 1• Information systems and services 1 1 r r r r r v i r r r — 6 Rental Rehabilitation Program � I• Loan servicing 1 1. Contract administration 1 1 I I• Home -ownership counseling I 1 1 1 9.05A. P., 15.oA. P j 1 I —a-------- 1 12.66A. P. ----.,"°'""«....-----rr c---------------- Thousand $ 61 s 41 2- BUDGET Changes in Resources 1997 1990 1999 2000 2001 Authorized Positions Changes in Strength 1.00--, 0.75--" 0.50 --, 0.25-1"' 0.00 1997 1999 1999 2000 2001 o Expenditures I I E7 Positions 1 CI DEPARTMENTAL..OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES HOUSING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY GRANT FUNDS GENERAL INFORMATION: The Community Development Block Grant is authorized by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.. Its purpose is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and very low-income. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is the source agency for this funding. The HOME program is designed to be a partnership among federal and local governments and those in the for -profit and non-profit sectors who build, own, manage, finance, or support low- income housing initiatives. The HOME program mandates the participation of non-profit developers, sponsors, and owners. HUD is the source agency for this funding. The City received its first allocation in FY1991-92. Local jurisdictions are required to provide matching funds. The Rental Rehabilitation Block Grant (RRBG) provides low -interest loans to help owners finance the rehabilitation of either single- or multi -family rental property that is affordable to low-income families. HUD, which is the source agency for this funding, no longer provides RRBG funds. The program is currently operating with program income from loan repayments. The Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) services extremely low-income residents of Tarrant County, primarily the disabled and elderly. The source agency for funding is the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs. The weatherization program receives funding from three grants, two of which cover minor repairs to roofs, walls, ceilings, furnaces and air conditioners, attic insulation, weather-stripping, caulking, window and door repair or replacement. The third (enhanced) grant complements the weatherization services provided for in the first two grants. Funding for this program has declined significantly from previous levels. The Comprehensive Housing Counseling program (CHC) is an intensive counseling program that works in conjunction with the City's In -Fill Housing Development program. The City of Fort Worth Housing Department was certified by HUD as a Housing Counseling Agency on December 19, 1997. The components of the expanded Housing Counseling program include: community outreach and education; intake and screening; homeownership training and counseling services; referrals; follow-up visits to potential homebuyers; and pre -purchase, pre -occupancy, post - occupancy and money management counseling. Other components include: short-term credit repair and mortgage -default counseling; rental counseling for tenants and landlords; and home improvement counseling. The CHC program is required for all first-time homebuyers. Balance Carried Forward New Funds Expenditures/Commitments Balance STATUS OF FUNDING 1998-99 1999-00 $11,281,803 $11,949,469 7,048,973 8,454,228 6,381,307 8,748,373 $11,949,469 $11,655,324 Approved Positions 1 46.67 I 45.00 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 2000-01 $11,655,324 7,447,487 18,599,416 $503,395 45.05 G-7 G-8 HOUSING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY OTHER FUNDING GENERAL INFORMATION: The Fort Worth Housing Finance Corporation (FWHFC) was initially established to issue mortgage revenue bonds to provide first-time homebuyer loan funds. The funds are generated by the sale of mortgage revenue bonds. The Fort Worth City Council functions as the FWHFC's board of directors. Over time, the FWHFC has accumulated a fund balance of approximately $5,000,000 dedicated to housing activities. The fund was accumulated through the refinancing of an earlier bond issue. Currently, only the interest from the fund is used for housing activities. The interest proceeds can be used for any housing activities approved by the FWHFC. This interest income has been an important source of matching funds for federal grants. Additionally, this fiscal year $710,876 will be utilized for new single-family housing construction and $439,235 for a land banking program. Radisson parking revenue comes from an underground parking garage located across the street from the Radisson Hotel that was completed in September 1981. The garage was funded by an Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The garage is currently under a 50-year lease to the owners of the Radisson Hotel. The hotel, which operates the parking garage, pays the City approximately $77,497 in rent each year. This revenue can be used for any Community Development Block Grant - eligible activity. Traditionally, the Radisson revenue has been used for home improvement loans. This year's revenue will serve as part of the match for the FY1999-00 HOME grant. Balance Carried Forward New Funds Expenditures/Commitments Balance Approved Positions l STATUS OF FUNDING 1998-99 1999-00 $2,375,031 $1,905,031 347,000 455,000 817,000 1,504,206 $1,905,031 $855,825 0.0 I 0.0 2000-01 $855, 825 620,339 738,215 $737,949 M CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENT HOUSING FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0051010 Administration $14,030 $48,636 $48,549 $48,549 0.00 0.45 0.40 0.40 0052010 Rehabilitation and Development 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0053010 Housing Services and Information 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 0.00 0_0 0.00 0.00 TOTAL $23,280 $57,886 $57,799 $57,799 0.00 0.45 0.40 0.40 G-11 HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION OVERVIEW OF FUNDING SOURCES FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 GENERAL FUND: $306,026 GRANT FUNDS: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $20,346 U. S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) 68,000 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) 141,500 TOTAL ALL GRANT FUNDS $229,846 TOTAL ALL FUNDING SOURCES $535,872 TOTAL APPROVED POSITIONS 10.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION GG0110071000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Human Relations Commission is responsible for resolving charges filed under the City's anti -discrimination ordinance; monitoring the fair employment practices of companies doing business within the City; and providing community relations programs, information and referral services, police and neighborhood information sessions and housing opportunity services. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $179,256 $224,817 $245,793 $261,800 Supplies 9,108 3,850 3,850 3,850 Contractual Services 36,081 41,119 40,376 40,376 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $224,445 $269,786 $290,019 $306,026 Authorized Positions I 3.75 j 3.75 4.001 4.00 G-13 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET G-14 HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - 10.0 A. P. GENERAL FUND 4.0 (GRANT FUNDS 6.0) HUMAN RELATIONS • Alleged discrimination complaint investigation resolution • Community relations programs • Community communications and linkage 4.0 A. P. r------------------, I• Fair Housing complaints within the I City of Fort Worth, Tarrant County, I and Arlington I • Information, referral and education I programs i I• Investigation and conciliation of I discrimination complaints in j I employment -related matters I I 6.0 A. P.I -------------------a BUDGET Thousand $ Changes in Resources 400--' 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1DExpenditures I AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 13 Positions SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES (3_15 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION GG0110071000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $269,786 A.P. 3.75 2000-01 ADOPTED. $306,026 A.P. 4.00 A) The adopted budget increases by $19,718 to fund the remaining 25 percent of the department Director's salary through the General Fund. Previously, the position was partially funded by grant funds. B) The adopted budget increases by $23,478 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $9,648 for four new computers on the lease exchange program. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET CiTY'OF FORT.W.ORTH 2O.00-01``EUDGET HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY GRANT FUNDS GENERAL INFORMATION: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding allows the department to provide comprehensive informational services to Fort Worth citizens on housing -related matters, particularly fair housing laws. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Cooperative Agreement provides for payment of the investigation and resolution of fair housing complaints, in the amount of $1,800 per investigation, staff training in HUD investigative procedures and outreach efforts to educate the community on fair housing laws. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) pays the department $500.00 per case up to the contracted number of cases accepted and $50.00 per deferred in -take, as specified in the contract. EEOC cases are processed in accordance with the legislative authority granted under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the City of Fort Worth Ordinance No. 7278, as amended. The Human Relations Commission (HRC) only investigates cases within the jurisdictional city limits of Fort Worth. STATUS OF FUNDING 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 New Funds $347,579 $347,579 $229,846 Expend itures]Commitments 347,579 347,579 229,846 Balance $0 $0 $0 Authorized Positions 1 6.251 6.251 6.00 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET G-19 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PLANNING GG01/0221000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Planning Department advises the City Manager, the Planning and Zoning commissions and the City Council on City planning -related matters. Planning also actively participates in and positively impacts the charting of Fort Worth's future by developing a comprehensive plan, policies and programs that encourage the establishment of a rational, coherent, urban form that promotes economic vitality and an improved quality of life for all its residents. To ensure 'rational, coherent city planning and development, the department focuses its efforts in five distinct functional divisions. Downtown and Neighborhood Planning, Comprehensive Planning, Urban Design, Research and Development Review. In accordance with the City's Financial Management Policy Statements (FMPS), which states that "To seek, apply for and effectively administer federal, state and foundation grants-in-aid that address the City's current priorities and policy objectives" (FMPS, Ch. VIII), the Department also utilizes grant funds to accomplish its goals. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $902,609 $997,507 $1,029,283 $1,075,833 Supplies 28,647 25,740 39,120 39,120 Contractual Services 242,177 248,058 257,633 257,633 Capital Outlay 73,510 40,000 0 0 Total Allocations $1,246,943 $1,311,305 $1,326,036 $1,372,586 ( Authorized Positions 18.0 19.0 20.0 20.0 G-21 ��c.»�•>>i>it►+�•��I��i►�lI�Ilaty`■ �lil�Ze'J G-22 PLANNING - 22.0 A. P. GENERAL FUND 20.0 (GRANT FUNDS 2.0) PLANNING DIRECTOR 1.0 A. P.� ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT • Special projects 1.0 A. P. DOWNTOWN & COMPREHENSIVE URBAN DESIGN RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING REVIEW PLANNING • Planning and urban • Data collection and • Comprehensive design analysis • Model Blocks Planning • Lancaster corridor • Demographic • Review zoning, • Targeted Area • Special plans design analysis annexation, easement vacation Planning (TAP) • Physical planning • North Main streetscape • Economic planning applications, and • Neighborhood 4.0 A. P. 3.0 A. P. • GIS planning plats planning 3.0 A. P. • Historic 3.0 A. P. preservation planning • Environmental review 4.0 A. P. Million $ 1.50- % BUDGET AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Resources Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113Expenditures I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 IMPositions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES G-23 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PLANNING GG01/0221000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $1,311,305 A.P. 19.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $1,372,586 A.P. 20.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $43,730 due to the transfer of one Planner position from the Grant Fund to the General Fund. B) The adopted budget increases by $115,769 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $21,698 for costs related to the Geographic Information System (GIS) implementation. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET G-27 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 000110800500:0809040 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Parks and Community Services Department is responsible for planning, designing, developing, and maintaining the City's network of parks, as well as for the planning and administration of the City's recreational and human services programs. The department is organized into five divisions. The Administration Division provides overall planning and direction for and administrative support to the department, as well as coordinating centralized information management support for the other departmental elements. The Northeast Region Division is responsible for the operation of nine community centers and the maintenance of the park system on the City's northeast side. This division also operates Aquatics, Athletics, and the Nature Center and Refuge. The Planning and Resource Management Division is responsible for identification of park system needs and for the design, engineering, and construction of park development projects. The Southwest Region Division is responsible for the operation of eight community centers and the maintenance of the park system on the southwest side of the City. This division also operates the Log Cabin Village and the Botanic Garden Center and Conservatory. The Community Services Division is responsible for the coordination of the Late Night Recreation Program, CODE:BLUE, coordination of volunteer activities, operation of three community centers, and oversight of human services programs, such as those at the Neighborhood Resource Development Centers. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998.99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $9,428,636 $10,822,262 $11,571,674 $11,948,032 Supplies 1,194,511 798,863 1,076,334 1,076,334 Contractual Services 3,338,597 4,303,786 4,701,052 4,741,052 Capital Outlay 450,240 617,000 755,900 755,900 Total Allocations $14,411,984 $16,541,911 $18,104,960 $18,521,318 Authorized Positions 273.4 278.4 286.4 286.4 • G-28 NORTHEAST REGION Administration North District Operations Community Centers -North Tri-Ethnic -Bertha Collins -Diamond Hill -Riverside -Nouhside -Late Night Program East District Operations Community Centers -Handley- Meadowbrook -Martin Luther King -Late Night Program -Hillside -Sycamore -Late Night Program CODE: BLUE Aquatics Athletics Nature Center and Refuge Million $ 20 r L 1 IEItimYA0 SOUTHWEST REGION • Administration • West District Operations Community Centers -Como Late Night Program -R. D. Evans -Thomas Place • South District Operations Community Centers -Worth Heights -Late Night Program -Highland Hills -Fire Station -Greenbriar -Southwest • Botanic Garden • Log Cabin Village 105.0 A. P. ADMINISTRATt ON • Departmental Management 8.0 A. P. - COMMUNITY I PLANNING AND SERVICES RESOURCE MANAGEMENT • Administration • Volunteer . Administration Coordinator • Late Night . Planning and Coordinator Development • Community Centers , Trades/Infrastructure -Southside , Trades/Events -Riverside (MPC) . Trades/Heavy -Fellowship Equipment Corner • Forestry and Landscape 8.9 A. P. Production BUDGET Changes in Resources i, Gang Intervention 1 Program 1• Neighborhood i Resources Development j I Centers i L----------I 59.0 A. P. I ZOO i i5ee Page G-37 I 1 GOLF ISee Page 0-1 i I I 1 FORT WORTH I -1 HERD 1 ISee Page S-35 I 1 I AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 I Ei Expenditures I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES GG01/0800500:0809040 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $16,541,911 A.P. 2.78.4 2000-01 ADOPTED: $18,521,318 A.P. 286.4 A) The adopted budget increases by $390,663 to convert four overages to permanent status, and for operational enhancements at the Botanic Garden. Council increased this amount by $40,000 to make repairs to a fence at the Garden. B) The adopted budget increases by $51,708 for the conversion of a Planner position overage to permanent status. C) The adopted budget increases by $724,639 for the soccer program for personnel, supplies, contractual services and construction of new soccer fields. This is the second of a five-year program to substantially increase the number of soccer fields and improve the quality of existing ones. D) The adopted budget increases by $1,086,561 due to actual and projected salary increases. E) The adopted budget increases by $385,394 for various technology costs, including additional leased computers, phone cost increases, and an increase in the number of technology projects in the department. F) The adopted budget increases by $201,516 for scheduled temporary employees to reflect pay increases for seasonal help (coaches, umpires, and life guards), as well as for increases in the number of temporary employees needed to staff additional fields. G) The adopted budget increases by $191,192 for supplies and contractual funds to pay for annual maintenance on dedicated parkland that the City has recently acquired. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET CITY OF FORT WQRTH 2000-0 BUDGET DEPARTMENT PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Communitv Services Division 0800500 Administration $182,188 $151,757 $272,162 $272,162 2.9 2.9 3.9 3.9 0800504 Southside Community Center 88,212 87,098 98,150 98,150 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 0800509 Riverside MPC Community Ctr. 85,190 86,729 100,962 100,962 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 0800510 Fellowship Corner 3,648 3,750 3,750 3,750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0800511 Late NightICODE:BLUE 588,382 596,460 0 0 16.0 16.0 0_0 0_0 Sub -Total $947,620 $925,794 $475,024 $475,024 23.9 23.9 8.9 8.9 Department Administration 0801000 Administration $995,255 $1.835.319 $1.199,460 $1.575,818 7_0 7_0 8_0 8_0 Sub -Total $995,255 $1,835,319 $1,199,460 $1,575,818 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 Golf and Tennis 0804005 Golf Course Management $1,902 $0 $0 $0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0804080 McLeland Tennis Center 7.140 10,450 26,500 26,500 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sub -Total $9,042 $10,450 $26,500 $26,500 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Southwest Region 0807010 SW Region Administration $272,747 $271,011 $310,185 $310,185 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0807021 West District Operations 1,227,729 1,296,563 1,290,930 1,290,930 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0807023 Como Community Center 145,562 130,822 271,693 271,693 3.5 3.5 6.5 6.5 0807027 Fire Station Community Ctr. 111,723 118,459 135,177 135,177 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0807028 R. D. Evans Community Ctr. 105,774 114,169 135,510 135,510 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0807029 Thomas Place Community Ctr. 101,998 107,374 120,079 120,079 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0807031 South District Operations 863,735 1,013,930 1,253,286 1,253,286 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 0807032 Worth Heights Community Ctr. 126,903 138,639 264,624 264,624 3.5 3.5 6.5 6.5 0807033 Highland Hills Community Ctr. 106,045 112,533 128,804 128,804 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted GG01 GENERAL Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Southwest Region (continued) 0807038 Greenbriar Community Center $111,932 $115,663 $139,427 $139,427 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0807039 Southwest Community Center 100,761 108,097 133,989 133,989 3.0 3.0 ' 3.0 3.0 0807080 Botanic Garden 1,434,503 1,334,051 1,717,934 1,757,934 27.0 27.0 31.0 31.0 0807090 Log Cabin Village 165,430 200,587 247J36 247,736 2_0 3_0 3.0 3_0 Sub -Total $4,874,842 $5,061,903 $6,149,374 $6,189,374 94.0 95.0 105.0 105.0 Northeast Region 0808010 NE Region Administration $217,581 $240,152 $263,679 $263,679 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0808021 North District Operations 972,393 1,078,779 1,191,318 1,191,318 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 0808022 Northside Community Ctr. 139,852 132,453 257,310 257,310 3.5 3.5 6.5 6.5 0808026 North Tri-Ethnic Community Ctr. 120,579 117,768 140,377 140,377 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0808027 Bertha Collins Community Ctr_ 114,845 116,117 149,632 149,632 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0808028 Diamond Hill Community Center 107,803 110,022 125,666 125,666 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0808029 Riverside Community Center 119,650 116,374 141,534 141,534 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0808031 East District Operations 751,464 814,363 828,063 828,063 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 0808035 MLK Community Center 139,001 140,214 284,096 284,096 3.5 3.5 6.5 6.5 0808036 Hand ley-Meadowbrook Community Center 115,455 116,400 137,851 137,851 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0808038 Hillside Community Center 117,550 112,212 134,350 134,350 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0808039 Sycamore Community Center 120,190 116,163 255,873 255,873 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 0808040 Graffiti Patrol 88,120 79,566 97,298 97,298 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0808050 Summer Day Camp 49,434 48,489 48,489 48,489 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0808060 Youth Sports 259,061 265,000 274,929 274,929 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0808070 Aquatics 469,609 362,628: 490,083 490,083 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0808080 Athletics 872,184 1,933,272 2,151,665 2,151,665 19.0 22.0 24.0 24.0 0808090 Nature Center & Refuge 255,749 269,200 338,540 338,54Q 7_0 7_0 770 7_0 Sub -Total $5,030,520 $6,169,172 $7,310,753 $7,310,753 91.5 94.5 105.5 105.5 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted GG01 GENERAL Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Planning and Resource Management (PRM) 0809010 PRM Administration $230,663 $281,447 $351,031 $351,031 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0809020 Planning & Development 199,009 146,621 298,808 298,808 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 0809030 Trades/infrastructure 878,269 776,085 878,223 878,223 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 0809034 Trades/Events 147,831 141,794 147,589 147,589 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0809035 Trades/Heavy Equipment 236,605 255,884 250,499 250,499 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0809040 Forestry & Landscape Production 862,328 937,442 1,017.699 1,017,699 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Sub -Total $2,554,705 $2,539,273 $2,943,849 $2,943,849 57.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 TOTAL $14,411,984 $16,541,911 $18,104,960 $18,521,318 273.4 278.4 286.4 286.4 G-37 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER ZOO 0001 /0815010:0815070 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The City of Fort Worth has contracted with the Fort Worth Zoological Association to manage the City's Zoological Park since FY1990-91. The City's Zoo Department maintains records for the City employees who work at the Zoo and tracks the City's annual subsidy that funds those employees' positions. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000.01 2000-01 Personal Services $2,900,972 $2,758,609 $2,838,609 $2,838,609 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Contractual Services 40 0 0 0 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $2,901,012 $2,758,609 $2,838,609 $2,838,609. Authorized Positions I 77.0 74.0 62.0 I 62.0 I CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET G-38 I EDUCATION 0.0 A. P. Million $ ,t n_/ ZOO - 62.0 A. P. I GUEST SERVICES • Food • Merchandise • Gate • Ride/information BUDGET Changes in Resources 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 Cl Expenditures 1 ADMINISTRATION 2.4 A. P. 0.0 A. P 1 ANIMALS • Mammals • Commissary • Veterinarian • Birds • Aquarium • Herpetarium I ENGINEERING • Landscape • Maintenance 57.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 3.0 A. P. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1OPositions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES G-39 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER zoo GG0110815010:0815070 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $2,758,609 A.P. 74.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $2,838,609 A.P. 62.0 A) As part of an agreement between the Zoo Association and the Parks and Community Services Department, 12 positions have been deleted through attrition, for savings of $309,782. An offsetting amount of $323,219 has been added to the scheduled temporaries account to assist in paying the cost of Zoo operations. B) The adopted budget is $80,000 higher than the FY1999-00 adopted budget to reflect an inflation increase last year of 2.9 percent. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS ZOO FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted GG01 GENERAL Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0815010 Administration $32,324 $92,171 $145,189 $145,189 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0815012 Food 463,047 80,738 54,477 54,477 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0815013 Merchandise 0 32,295 75,395 75,395 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0815014 Grounds 217,602 35,577 142,334 142,334 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0815015 Gate 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0815016 Rides 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0815020 Education 170,816 43,060 77,120 . 77,120 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0815025 Landscape and Grounds Maintenance 70,411 81,789 87,082 87,082 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0815030 Mammals 865,518 1,160,177 1,106,970 1,106,970 30.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 0815035 Commissary 180,503 178,485 174,844 174,844 8.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 0815036 Veterinarian 116,740 141,889 127,405 127,405 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 0815040 Birds 264,349 282,233 270,843 270,843 10.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 0815050 Aquarium 209,743 254,133 278,322 278,322 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 0815060 Herpetarium 258,851 274,604 262,113 262,113 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 0815070 Maintenance 51,108 101,458 36,515 36,515 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 TOTAL $2,901,012 $2,758,609 $2,838,609 $2,838,609 77.0 74.0 62.0 62.0 G) 41 co DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER LIBRARY GG01 /0841000:0844002 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Fort Worth Public Library is responsible for delivering library services to meet the educational, informational, cultural, and recreational needs of Fort Worth citizens of all ages. The department is divided into five divisions: Administration, Automation/Support Services, Central Library, Branch Libraries, and Regional Libraries. The Administration Division provides overall direction for library operations and plans for the delivery of library services to the community. The Automation/Support Services Division is comprised of two sections, The Automation Section operates the library's automated circulation system. Support Services is responsible for all aspects of the materials procurement and distribution process, registration of patrons, and preparation of borrowers' cards, processing of invoices, and repair of damaged and worn materials. The Central Library is the main source for research information for the Fort Worth Public Library System and the North Texas Library System, The public service offerings include services that are available only at the Central Library, as well as the general services available at most other libraries in the Fort Worth system. The Central Library is also responsible for the outreach program that serves home -bound institutionalized residents. The Branch Libraries Division directly delivers library services through twelve neighborhood branch libraries located throughout the city. The Southwest Regional Library primarily serves the residents of the southwest area of the city, and the East Regional Library primarily serves citizens of the eastern area of the city. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $6,635,718 $7,563,393 $8,097,309 $8,437,300 Supplies 1,929,352 1,789,971 2,128,396 2,128,396 Contractual Services 1,280,511 1,552,539 1,751,174 1,791,474 Capital Outlay 39,026 0 ( 0 0 Total Allocations $9,884,607 $10,905,903I $11,976,879', $12,357,170 Authorized Positions 182.3 198.5I 200.5 200.5 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET G-45 G-46 LIBRARY - 200.5 A. P. ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Volunteer services administration • Public relations coordination • Material selection • Reference center material 18.5 A. P. I AUTOMATION AND NEIGHBORHOOD BRANCHES SUPPORT SERVICES • General services through twelve • operation of automated library branch libraries and two regional system libraries • Patron services 57.0 A. P. • Centralized clerical support 28.5 A. P. CENTRAL LIBRARY • Genealogy • Governmental documents • Interlibrary loan • Research • Microcomputer availability • General services • Heritage Center 61.5 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources Million $ 16—✓'r 12--" 4� 0 1997 165--' 110-- 55� EAST REGIONAL LIBRARY • Multipurpose library to serve several neighborhoods in the City's eastern area SOUTHWEST REGIONAL LIBRARY + Multipurpose library to serve several neighborhoods in the City's southwest area 17.5 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 01 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 10 Positions I 17.5 A. P. SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER LIBRARY GG01 /0841000:0844002 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $10,905,903 A.P. 198.50 2000-01 ADOPTED: $12,357,170 A.P. 200.50 A) The adopted budget increases by $70,162 for the addition of two new Librarians at Central Library. B) The adopted budget increases by $873,907 for actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $725,108 for the first full year of operation of the new Summerglen Branch Library. D) The adopted budget increases by $120,000 to address ergonomic and safety issues at each library branch. E) The adopted budget increases by $112,399 for retirement costs due to a proportional increase in salaries. F) The adopted budget increases by $61,195 for group health charges due to a projected increase in rates in FY2000-01. G) The adopted budget increases by $40,300 to install fire and intrusion alarms at various branches. H) The adopted budget decreases by ($19,342) for workers' compensation due to planned use of Workers' Compensation fund balance in FY2000-01. G-47 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET POLICTISSUESG-449 CITY OF FORT .W.ORTH 2O00-01 ':BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS LIBRARY FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted GG01 GENERAL Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Administration 0841000 Administration $1,390,191 $1,849,257 $1,707,911 $2,088,202 16.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 0841030 Materials Selection Unit 131,112 134,306 140,859 140,859 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Sub -Total $1,521,303 $1,983,563 $1,848,770 $2,229,061 19.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 Automation/ Support Services 0841020 Automation $276,171 $285,912 $317,544 $317,544 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0842001 Support Services 2,756,738 2.710,735 2,849,562 2,849,562 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 Sub -Total $3,032,909 $2,996,647 $3,167,106 $3,167,106 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 Central Library 0842002 Central Library $2,126,796 $2,260,189 $2.517,651 $2,517,651 51.5 59.5 61.5 61.5 Sub -Total $2,126,796 $2,260,189 $2,517,651 $2,517,651 51.5 59.5 61.5 61.5 Branch Libraries 0843001 Wedgwood $216,318 $215,381 $228,543 $228,543 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 0843002 Meadowbrook 246,903 249,971 267,794 267,794 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 0843003 Northeast 179,830 161,561 176,101 176,101 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0843004 Northside 198,621 190,372 206,251 206,251 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 0843005 Seminary South 204,303 198,202 215,788 215,788 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0843006 East Berry 179,027 232,114 208,218 208,218 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0843007 Ridglea 300,400 276,397 299,007 299,007 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 0843008 E.M. Shamblee 123,143 161,774 141,318 141,318 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0843009 Diamond Hill/Jarvis 179,355 172,946 186,740 186,740 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0843010 Cavile Outreach 61,815 62,094 67,736 67,736 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0843011 Butler Outreach 45,166 59,250 59,716 59,716 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0843012 Summerglen 0 382,608 717,998 717,998 0_0 7_0 7.0 7_0 Sub -Total $1,934,881 $2,362,670 $2,775,210 $2,775,210 49.8 57.0 57.0 57.0 G) t7 to DEPARTMENT LIBRARY FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Regional Libraries 0844001 Southwest Regional 0844002 East Regional Library Sub -Total TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $655,121 $655, 512 $887,111 $887,111 16.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 613,597 647,322 781,031 781,031 16.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 $1,268,718 $1,302,834 $1,668,142 $1,668,142 33.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 $9,884,607 $10,905,903 $11,976,879 $12,357,170 182.3 198.5 200.5 200.5 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY F, DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER DEVELOPMENT 000110061000:0066000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Department of Development advises the City Manager's Office, the City Council and all appropriate boards and commissions on matters affecting growth and development in the City; coordinates development -related matters with other City departments; and supervises the enforcement of all policies and ordinances pertaining to city development activities. Departmental operations are divided along functional lines into four divisions. The Administration Division is responsible for overall departmental management, fiscal administration, policy development, information systems coordination and annexation requests. Building Administration - Office Operations coordinates field inspections operations and communications, permit and license issuance, and trade boards staff. Employees in the Inspections - Field Operations Division perform inspections and plans reviews. The Applications Division staff processes all zoning and development applications and supports the City's development -related boards and commissions. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $3,042,759 ........................................................................ $3,510,750 $3,728,332 $3,786,390 Supplies 113,617 90,743 103,445 103,445 Contractual Services 1,058,688 697,624 1,102,807 1,102,807 Capital Outlay 63,651 89,200 94,000 94,000 Total Allocations $4,278,715 $4.388,317 $5,028,584 $5,086,642 Authorized Positions 77.0 77.0 79.0 79.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET H-1 ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management Policy development • Fiscal administration • Information systems coordination • Annexation requests :........... .. 7.0 A> P. OFFICE OPERATION FIELD OPERATION INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS • Trade boards staff • Inspection services for • License issuance building, electrical, • Field inspection mechanical, plumbing, sign communications and zoning functions • Permit issuance • Plans exam and review 13.0 A. P. 46.0 A. P. Million $ 8.0---, 0.0 1997 BUDGET Changes in Resources nExpenditures C7Revenues :g 2001 60--' 40- 20- 0 ' 1997 APPLICATIONS • Boards and commission staff • Zoning, development, and planning applications and requests AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1998 13.0 A. P. 2001 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER DEVELOPMENT GG01/0061000:0065000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: 2000-01 ADOPTED: $4 388,317 A.P. 77.0 $5,086,642 A.P. 79.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $61,021 for one Geographic Information System (GIS) Planner position. The additional position is necessary to meet the increased demands resulting from Council's approval of a more proactive annexation policy. B) The adopted budget increases by $10,700 for the addition of one Senior Customer Service Representative position. The actual cost of $32,700 to add this position will be partially offset by a $22,000 reduction in the department's scheduled temporaries line- item allocation. The authorized position will maintain the City's Billboard Registration Program, as well as perform other clericalladministrative duties. C) The adopted budget increases by $400,456 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. D) The adopted budget increases by $61,000 per the 1T Solutions Department's FY2000- 01schedule of rates and charges. E) The adopted budget increases by $58,160 for additional resources for the Combined Residential Inspection Program. Such resources as office and operating supplies, two new vehicles, and cell phones are needed to enable the current staff of Inspectors to perform their duties. F) The adopted budget increases by $47,000 for an additional two replacement vehicles as part of the City's FY2000-01 Vehicle Replacement Program. The vehicles will help in improving the effectiveness of the Combined Residential Inspection Program. G) The adopted budget increases by $29,525 for scheduled temporaries due to the continuation of the Residential Inspector overage positions. This increase is related to continued strong citywide development and its inherent impact on departmental operations. H) The adopted budget increases by $16,300 for machinery and equipment repairs. Based on budgetary re -estimates, maintenance costs have increased due both to the general age of the fleet and to the use of vehicles pulled from the auction line for the Combined Residential Inspection Program. 2IN CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET O `cz 800 U c 600 o U) z .� O.. 400 Moil] 0 1995-96 ACTUAL 7—� 974 982 995 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL. ESTIMATED PROJECTED FISCAL. YEARS 6.3'1 6.34 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 ACTUAL ACTUAL. ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FISCAL YEARS DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0061000 Administration 0062000 Inspections Office Operation 0063000 Inspections Field Operation 0065000 Applications TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $664,402 $1,078,656 $997,756 $1,055,814 566,306 417,853 742,611 742,611 2,168,887 2,330,627 2,637,710 2,637,710 879,120 561,181 650,507 650,507 $4,278,715 $4,388,317 $5,028,584 $5,086,642 Adopted Budget 1998-99 6.0 12.0 46.0 13.0 77.0 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Budget 1999-00 6.0 12.0 46.0 13.0 77.0 Proposed Budget 2000-01 7.0 13.0 46.0 13.0 79.0 Adopted Budget 2000-01 7.0 13.0 46.0 13.0 79.0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY H-11 t DEPARTMENT _ FUNDICENTER TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS GG01/0201000:0208006 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Transportation and Public Works Department seeks to improve the physical condition of the City by maintaining current transportation and public works facilities and by aiding in the coordination of the most convenient and efficient public transportation system for all Fort Worth residents. The Administration Division is responsible for the management and coordination of all activities of the department's seven operating divisions. Administration also manages the City -owned parking facilities. The seven operating divisions are Infrastructure Management, Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning and Development, Traffic Services, Street Lighting, Building Services and Street Services. These divisions provide for City of Fort Worth infrastructure needs; the design, installation, and maintenance of street lights and traffic signals; and planning for future city transportation needs. The department also installs and maintains parking meters and provides maintenance services for City -owned buildings. The Street Services Division performs maintenance and repair work on more than 5,600 lane miles of city streets. The division consists of the following sections: Scheduled Maintenance (repair of moderately damaged streets), Customer Response (24- hour emergency repairs, special projects, crack sealing and pot hole patching), Rehabilitation/Overlay (complete rehabilitation of street surface, as well as in-house asphalt overlay program), Concrete Maintenance (curb, gutter, sidewalk, and concrete drainage system repair), and Drainage Maintenance. In accordance with the City's Financial Management Policy Statement (FMPS), which states that " Within the resources available each fiscal year, the City shall maintain capital assets... minimize... maintenance costs..." (FMPS, ch. 11, Section C), the Department uses allocated funds to preserve the integrity of streets, applies cost effective techniques to prolong the useful life of asphalt and concrete streets, and when possible enters into Interlocal Agreements to share the street maintenance costs. Allocations Personal Services Supplies Contractual Services Capital Outlay Total Allocations � IAuthorized Positions Actual 1998-99 Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $13,568,677 $14,964,344 4,300,615 4,212,944 8,205,339 I 9,902,658 1,089,590 $27,164,221 390.0 773,000 $29.852,946 390.0 $15,267,882 $15,821,730 4,208,443 4,208,443 9,674,103 9,774,103 880,500 880,500 $30,030,928 $30,684,776 399.0 399.0 H-12 TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS - 399.0 A. P. ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management ,, , _ _ _ • Parking facilities 1 MUNICIPAL • Dispatch 1 PARKING 1 . Equipment coordination See Page Q-1 1 17.0 A. P. 1— — — — — INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT • Public works project planning • Facilities planning and coordination • Capital Improvement Program coordination and management 16.0 A. P. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • Operation of traffic control system • Traffic impact analysis • Traffic engineering 20.0 A. P. TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC SERVICES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT • Parking meters • Signs and markings • New development review • Installation and maintenance • Regional transportation of traffic signals • Planning 16.0 A. R 510 A. P. BUILDING SERVICES STREET SERVICES • Custodial services • Maintenance of streets, storm • Building maintenance and drainage, curbs and gutters repair • Emergency response • Installation and maintenance of street lights „ 77.0 A. P. 200.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength (❑Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES H-13 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS GG0110201000:0208006 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $29,852,946 A.P. 390.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $30,684,776 A.P. 399.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $214,033 for the conversion to permanent status of five overage positions. The positions include two Utility Inspectors and one Administrative Technician in the Traffic Engineering Division, as well as one Construction Inspector and one Administrative Assistant in the Planning & Development Division. B) The adopted budget increases by $1,549,564 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $636,500 for vehicle replacement in the Traffic Services and Street Services divisions. D) The adopted budget decreases by ($267,916) for workers' compensation due to the planned use of Workers' Compensation fund balance. E) The adopted budget increases by $131,493 in group health insurance based on a projected rate increase in FY2000-01. F) The adopted budget increases by $123,755 in retirement contributions due to salary increases. G) The adopted budget decreases by ($103,904) for Equipment Services Division charges due to the replacement of aging vehicles and equipment. H) The adopted budget increases by $100,000 in speed hump projects. 1) The adopted budget increases by $47,426 to implement a new uniform policy. J) The adopted budget increases by $45,360 for a records retention microfilm project. K) The adopted budget decreases by ($30,000) for one-time painting of parking meters in FY1999-00. Q The adopted budget increases by $24,974 because of the increased cost of paving hot mix. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Idrm TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS LANE MILES OF ASPHALT RESURFACING 1994-2001 250 - 200 L�l1 150 11J Z 100 J 50 0 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATE FISCAL YEARS * The decline in lane miles is due to increased costs for contract labor and paving material DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Administration 0201000 Administration 0201001 Infrastructure Management Sub -Total Traffic 0202501 Traffic Engineering Sub -Total Transportation 0203001 Planning and Development Sub -Total Traffic Services 0204001 Administration 0204002 Signs and Marking 0204003 Signals Sub -Total Street Liahtinq and Signals 0204501 Street Lighting 0204503 Traffic Operations Sub -Total Buildinq Maintenance 0205001 Building Services 0205002 Building Maintenance 0205003 Administration Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,514,505 $2,245,481 $1,483,508 $2,037,356 22.0 22.0 17.0 17.0 4,535,346 6.135,173 5,839.053 5.907.355 11.0 13.0 16.0 16.0 $6,049,851 $8,380,654 $7,322,561 $7,944,711 33.0 35.0 33.0 33.0 $1,038,127 $1,250,494 $1.404,898 $1,396.596 22.0 19.0 20.0 20.0 $1,038,127 $1,250,494 $1,404,898 $1,396,596 22.0 19.0 20.0 20.0 $548,227 $643,881 $763,563 $763,563 13.0 14.0 16.0 10.0 $548,227 $643,881 $763,563 $763,563 13.0 14.0 16.0 16.0 $504,405 $397,061 $469,565 $469,565 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 1,386,275 1,312,808 1,351,921 1,391,921 24.0 22.0 23.0 23.0 734,890 858,519 817,175 817,175 19.0 20.0 21.0 21.0 $2,625,570 $2,568,388 $2,638,661 $2,678,661 51.0 51.0 53.0 53.0 $1,801,629 $2,287,974 $2,009,366 $2,009,366 39.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 45 0 0 0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $1,801,674 $2,287,974 $2,009,366 $2,009,366 39.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 $951,349 $930,872 $972,247 $972,247 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 3,044,767 3,263,142 3,301,796 3,301,796 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 857,673 933,351 983,629 983,629 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 $4,853,789 $5,127,365 $5,257,672 $5,257,672 77.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 In DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Street Services 0208001 Administration 0208002 Scheduled Maintenance 0208003 Customer Response 0208004 Rehabilitation/Overlay 0208005 Concrete Maintenance 0208006 Drainage Maintenance Sub -Total TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,515,223 $844,058 $945,196 $945,196 12.0 12.0 15.0 15.0 2,665,992 1,984,216 2,065,262 2,065,262 40.0 28.0 29.0 29.0 1,130,664 1,534,818 1,662,548 1,662,548 24.0 36.0 31.0 31.0 3,117,898 3,466,951 3,757,150 3,757,150 43.0 43.0 47.0 47.0 1,062,438 1,120,960 1,165,299 1,165,299 24.0 24.0 23.0 23.0 754,768 643,187 1,038.752 1,038.752 12.0 12.0 17.0 17.0 $10,246,983 $9,594,190 $10,634,207 $10,634,207 155.0 155.0 162.0 162.0 $27,164,221 $29.852,946 $30,030,928 $30,684,776 390.0 390.0 399.0 399.0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY H-21 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PUBLIC EVENTS GG0110251000:0252000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The City of Fort Worth operates and maintains both the Will Rogers Memorial Center and the Fort Worth Convention Center. The department promotes and schedules events in these facilities. Among other events, the facilities host the Southwestern Exposition and Livestock Show, political and other conventions and conferences, equestrian events, banquets, circuses, concerts, hockey games, theatrical performances and various community events. In addition, the Convention Center provides both daily and monthly parking for individuals working or visiting downtown. The Cowtown Coliseum is a City -owned facility; however, it is currently under private management. The Coliseum is utilized for rodeos and other public events in support of the Fort Worth Stockyards Historic District. Several initiatives planned for FY2000-01, most notably the renovation of the Fort Worth Convention Center, demonstrate the department's dedication to the City's Financial Management Policy Statement directive to "maintain capital. assets and infrastructure at a sufficient level to protect the City's investment, to minimize future replacement and maintenance costs, and to continue service levels." Faced with an old, deteriorating building stock, the department is focusing its efforts and funding on the infrastructure needs that largely determine the number of guests the facility will draw. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $4,202,491 $4,698,576 $4,895,232 $5,002,305 Supplies 753,847 736,953 718,600 718,600 Contractual Services 2.364,943 2,147,729 2,453,682 2,453,682 Capital Outlay 465,029 184,300 180,900 180,900 Total Allocations $7,786,310 $7,767,558 $8,248,414 $8,355,487 Authorized Positions 109.0 I 115.0 115.0 I 115.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET H-22 Million $ a_/ PUBLIC EVENTS - 115.0 A. P. Will Rogers Memorial Center 49.0 A.P. BUDGET Changes in Resources Administration 6.0 A. P. Fort Worth Convention Center 60.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength V 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 10 Positions I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 ❑ Expenditures I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER PUBLIC EVENTS GG01/0251000:0252000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $7,767,558 A.P. 115.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $8,355,487 A.P. 115.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $396,011 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. B) The adopted budget increases by $107,680 due to the elimination of the budgeted salary savings allocation from the previous year. The department has filled vacant positions quickly this fiscal year; therefore, there is no reason to maintain the budgeted salary savings in FY2000-01. C) The adopted budget increases by $97,313 for other contractual expenditures based on actual facilities usage. D) The adopted budget increases by $93,000 for equipment repair based on actual FY1999-00 expenditures. E) The adopted budget decreases by ($86,000) for inside repairs and maintenance, due to the fact that expenditures have come in significantly below the budgeted amounts in the last few years. F) The adopted budget decreases by ($74,973) for scheduled temporaries based on a reduction in actual usage, due in part to the conversion of four "S01" temporary positions to permanent status in FY1999-00. G) The adopted budget decreases by ($73,000) for water and wastewater charges based on current departmental usage. H-23 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET H-24 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PUBLIC EVENTS GG01/0251000-10252000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $7,767,558 A.P. 115.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $8,355,487 A.P. 115.0 H) The adopted budget increases by $63,500 for additional lease computers added in FY1999-00 as part of the City's lease exchange program. 1) The adopted budget increases by $59,400 for vehicle and equipment purchases. J) The adopted budget decreases by ($50,000) for overtime charges to better align the budgeted amount with actual expenditures. Expenditures decreased in part due to personnel additions in FY1999-00, which reduced the overall need for overtime. K) The adopted budget increases by $47,535 for telephone expenditures based on actual departmental usage. L) The adopted budget decreases by ($40,000) for vehicle repair and maintenance based on actual expenditures. M) The adopted budget increases by $38,437 for retirement costs as a result of salary increases. N) The adopted budget increases by $32,396 for group health expenditures based on projected FY2000-01 costs. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET H-27 ATTENDANCE AT PUBLIC EVENTS FACILITIES 5.0-� 4.0 --" Ui LL1 U) 3.0 LLl ® O LU E r C 2.0 Q� 1.0 0.0 I RO 1995-96 1996-97 **1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED FISCAL YEARS FACILITIES RENTALS 7P7.9 2923 24( 18C Q Z of 120 60 1995-96 1996-97 **1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED FISCAL YEARS "The City purchased the Tarrant County Convention Center in 1997, thereby significantly increasing the number of people served by the Public Events Department. DEPARTMENT PUBLIC EVENTS FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0251000 Will Rogers Memorial Center $4,680,829 $4,430,901 $4,575,008 $4,575,008 45.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 0252000 Fort Worth Convention Center 3,105,481 3.336,657 3.673,406 3.780,479 64.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 TOTAL $7,786,310 $7,767,558 $8,248,414 $8,355,487 109.0 115.0 115.0 115.0 2 N co DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CITY SERVICES GG0110210500:0214004 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: City Services` Administration Division provides general managerial support for the department's other three divisions (Code Compliance, Equipment Services, and Solid Waste Management), including contract management, fiscal control and performance of personnel functions. The City Services Department, Code Compliance Division is responsible for protecting and improving the quality of life in Fort Worth by enforcing the City's environmental codes. The Code Compliance Division promotes and enforces the City Code through inspection of neighborhoods and buildings. Beyond code enforcement, the division also focuses attention on public relations and educational programs, considering them an integral part of any effort to minimize the traditional, heavy reliance on enforcement activities to ensure compliance with environmental requirements. Nonetheless, Code Compliance does take legal action, when necessary, to enforce the City Code. During FY1996-97, the Code Compliance Division was divided into the following four sections: Administration, Field Operations, Special Projects and Multi -Family Inspections. By allowing the divisional staff to concentrate efforts in these specific areas, Code Compliance can offer improved services and an enhanced environment to all Fort Worth residents. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $2,477,450 $2,805,867 $2,825,509 $2,935,632 Supplies 205,943 259,567 196,027 196,027 Contractual Services 2,138,900 1,964,428 2,171,634 2,171,634 Capital Outlay 59,248 67,600 33,800 33,800 Total Allocations $4,881,541 $5,097,462 $5,226,970 $5,337,093 Authorized Positions 67.5 68.0 I 68.0 68.0 f-1 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1-2 CITY SERVICES - 68.0 A. P. - - 1 EQUIPMENT SERVICES 1 1 1 See rage R-3 i ---------------- ---1 FI1. ELD OPERATIO . NS . Environmental code enforcement 37.0 A. P. Million $ 6.0-� 4.0--' 2 0.0• ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Financial management 3.0 A. P. CODE COMPLIANCE ADMINISTRATION • Division management • Environmental code enforcement 8.0 A. P. ---------- L ---------- 1 SOLID WASTE 1 1 1 See Page N-1 1 1 L-----------------.. --- SPECIAL PROJECTS MULTI -FAMILY INSPECTION, N. • Code violations abatement • Apartment code enforcement BUDGET Changes in Resources []Expenditures I 11.0 A. P AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 2001 9.o A. P. 1-3 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET {CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CITY SERVICES GG01/0210500:0214004 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $5,097,462 A.P. 68.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $5,337,093 A.P. 68.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $323,155 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. B) The adopted budget increases by $100,000 to enable Code Compliance to increase the frequency of public property mowings to meet heightened property maintenance expectations. The additional mows should permit Code Compliance to meet the same property maintenance standards for City -owned properties to which it holds private property owners responsible. C) The adopted budget increases by $60,000 for other contractual services to allow for installation of the VOCARTA system. VOCARTA combines Geographic Information System (GIS), Global Positioning System (GPS), and other technologies to enable Code Enforcement Officers to quickly identify the particulars of properties in violation of the City Code. Budgeted monies are for the purchase of the software and equipment necessary to implement the system. D) The adopted budget decreases by ($50,100) for postage based on historical usage. E) The adopted budget increases by $35,000 for temporary labor based on the expectation that the current high incidence of extended medical leave will continue in FY2000-01. With continued high utilization of major medical leave by employees, the need and length of assignment for temporary replacements is expected to increase, along with the cost to provide that service. F) The adopted budget increases by $33,800 for the purchase of authorized replacement vehicles for FY2000-01. Code Compliance has been authorized to replace two sedans. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 400 --, 350 300 250 U) - 200 -i Z 150 100 ----, 50-i 0 350 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 **1999-00 2000-01 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED FISCAL YEARS "Decrease due to litigation, which prevented demolitions for the first six months of the fiscal year. DEPARTMENT CITY SERVICES FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Citv Services Department D210500 Administration Subtotal Code Compliance Division 0214001 Administration 0214002 Field Operations 0214003 Special Projects 0214004 Multi -Family Inspections Subtotal TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $216,164 $232.492 $229,350 $229,350 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $216,164 $232,492 $229,350 $229,350 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $542,915 $857,942 $691,840 $801,963 7.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 1,851,250 1,721,981 1,975,219 1,975,219 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 1,872,226 1,935,810 1,920,392 1,920,392 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 398,986 349,237 410,169 410,169 9_0 9_0 9_0 9_0 $4,665,377 $4,864,970 $4,997,620 $5,107,743 64.5 65.0 65.0 65.0 $4,881,541 $5,097,462 $5,226,970 $5,337,093 67.5 68.0 68.0 68.0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER POLICE GG01/0351000:0356500 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Police Department, under the direction of the Chief of Police, develops and implements programs to deter crime and enforce traffic laws to protect life and property within the City of Fort Worth. Specific departmental responsibilities include crime prevention, the apprehension of persons suspected of committing crimes, recovery of stolen property, and regulation of such non -criminal conduct as traffic enforcement. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $68,828,067 $77,023,605 $77,064,301 $80,710,800 Supplies 1,457, 526 1,511,888 1,637,952 1,637, 951 Contractual Services 10.560,499 9,660,084 10,458,455 10,458,456 Capital Outlay 19,956 0 0 0 Total Allocations $80,866,048 $88,195,577 $89,160,708 $92,807,206 Authorized Positions 1371.0 1372.0 1385.0 I 1385.0 -11 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1-12 POLICE - 1578.0 A. P. GENERAL FUND 1385.0 A. P. (CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT 176.0 A. P.) (GRANT FUND 17.0 A. P.) I EXECUTIVE SERVICES BUREAU • Fiscal & Equipment Management • Psychological Services • Internal Affairs • Staff Services • Training Division • Weapons Range 67.0 A. P. I NIW FIELD OPERATIONS BUREAU • North Division • West Division • Neighborhood Policing Districts 369.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources Million $ 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 El Expenditures I ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management 6.0 A. P. I S!E FIELD OPERATIONS BUREAU • South Division • East Division • Neighborhood Policing Districts 351.0 A. P. SPECIAL OPERATIONS SERVICES SUPPORT BUREAU BUREAU • Criminal investigation • Major crimes • Auto theft • Violent personal crimes • Vice • Special investigations • Special operations • Traffic Division 322.0 A. P. • Communications • Alarms Unit • Records • Offense reporting • Property control • Auto Pound • Crime Lab • Jail • K-9 Unit • Mounted Patrol • Air Support 270.0 A. P. j AWARDED I ASSETS r ISee Page S-95 I CRIME I DISTRICT I 1See Page T-1 I AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength Changes in Strength 350--' 1200✓ 300-. 1000- 250 800- 200- 600- 150 400- . 100— so-� . 200- .. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 I 13Civilian Positions I I El Civil Service Positions SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 1-13 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER POLICE GG01/0351000:0356500 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $88,195,577 A.P. 1,372.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $92,807,206 A.P. 1,385.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $367,190 for a total increase in authorized staff size of 13 positions. Ten civil service positions will be added in April 2001 to increase traffic enforcement within the city limits. One civilian position will be added to provide information technology services for crime analysis and response. One civilian position will be added to record traffic accident and citation data. One civilian position will be added to address increased workloads in the Crime Lab. The total increase includes salaries, benefits, and a portion of required equipment and training expenses. Salary savings have also been budgeted to account for the portion of the fiscal year in which the new civil service positions will be vacant. 13) The adopted budget increases by $3,095,353 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget decreases by ($719,692) for workers' compensation expenses due to the planned use of Workers' Compensation fund balance. D) The adopted budget increases by $383,752 for group health insurance costs due to a projected increase in rates in FY2000-01. E) The adopted budget increases by $343,210 for contributions to civil service retirement. The increase is tied to salary increases and expansion of authorized civil service staff. F) The adopted budget increases by $322,424 for contractual expenditures, primarily for increases in the jail contract with Tarrant County and the auto pound contract. The portion of the increase related to the jail contract will be offset by a transfer from the Crime Control and Prevention District Fund. G) The adopted budget increases by $198,800 for wireless communications charges. H) The adopted budget increases by $173,671 for shift differential pay, based on current expenditure levels and a FY1999-00 rate increase recommended by the Human Resources Department. 1-14 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER POLICE GG0110351000:0356500 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $88,195,577 A.P. 1,372.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $92,807,206 A.P. 1,385.0 1) The adopted budget increases by $155,454 for basic telephone services. The increase will maintain current service levels for the department. J) The adopted budget increases by $144,451 for scheduled temporary services. The increase is primarily driven by a FY1999-00 mid -year increase in the hourly wage paid to crossing guards in the Traffic Division. K) The adopted budget increases by $119,236 for Medicare costs. The increase is tied to salary increases and expansion of authorized staff. L) The adopted budget increases by $113,738 for civil service overtime expense. The increase is based on current year expenditures and projected salary increases for civil service employees. M) The adopted budget increases by $77,241 for contributions to civilian retirement. The increase is tied to salary increases and expansion of authorized staff. N) The adopted budget increases by $87,104 for civilian holiday overtime. The increase is based on current year expenditures and projected salary increases for civilian employees. O) The adopted budget increases by $64,863 for operating supplies. The increase is based on current year expenditures, including previously unbudgeted D.A.R.E. supplies that are an integral part of the program. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET CITY OF FORT WORTH 2OM.01 BUDGET NUMBER OF PART 1 OFFENSES* COMMITTED FY1990-91 THROUGH FY2000-01 (PROJECTED) 80000 75000 70000 65000 60000 l-17 55000 P Z 50000 . 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-OD 2000-01 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FISCAL YEARS * Under the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting, Part I crimes include murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny/theft and auto theft. DEPARTMENT POLICE FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Administration 0351000 Administration Sub -Total Executive Services Bureau 0352000 Executive Services 0352100 Fiscal and Equipment Management 0352200 Psychological Services 0352300 Internal Affairs 0352400 Staff Services 0352500 Training Division 0352501 Weapons Range Sub -Total Operations Support Bureau 0353000 Operations Support 0353100 Communications 0353101 Police Information Center 0353102 Alarms 0353300 Records 0353301 DECOR - Offense Reporting 0353400 Forensics / Property Division 0353401 Crime Lab 0353402 Property Control 0353403 Auto Pound 0353500 Support Services 0353501 Jail 0353502 K-9 Unit 0353503 Mounted Patrol 0353600 Air Support Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $636,581 $1,129,806 $480,385 $496,182 7.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 $636,581 $1,129,806 $480,385 $496,182 7.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 $319,814 $347,071 $296,749 $386,085 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 772,735 888,214 1,136,142 1,207,227 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 128,383 136,964 138,181 143,447 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 713,128 786,748 767,042 842,218 8.0 11.0 10.0 12.0 3,460,687 3,103,973 3,656,604 3,620,257 12.0 9.0 11.0 10.0 1,106,710 1,365,327 1,458, 879 1,508, 903 17.0 18.0 19.0 19.0 204,897 209,142 211,868 217,134 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 $6,706,354 $6,837,439 $7,665,465 $7,925,271 62.0 64.0 65.0 67.0 $201,054 $230,833 $232,245 $240,144 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4,032,064 4,301,344 4,364,241 4,214,679 109.0 109.0 109.0 97.0 35 0 0 436,543 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 199,724 220,788 214,851 228,015 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 903,461 1,030,700 963,875 1,029,696 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 1,121,432 1,295,863 1,248,911 1,346,326 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 0 0 0 117,431 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 672,449 738,188 782,307 699,105 12.0 12.0 13.0 10.0 382,094 435,010 410,031 438,992 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 1,842,724 1,866,508 1,910,581 1,971,137 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 0 0 189,115 132,684 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2,917,202 2,814,231 3,059,877 3,034,969 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 573,312 588,136 602,016 623,079 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 811,737 873,509 766,395 819,505 12.0 14.0 13.0 13.0 969,685 1, 038,172 1, 067,930 1.096.891 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 $14,626,973 $15,433,282 $15,812,375 $16,429,196 270.0 272.0 272.0 270.0 DEPARTMENT POLICE FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description North/West Field Operations Bureau 0354000 N/W Field Operations Bureau 0354100 North Division 0354101 Neighborhood Policing District (NPD) No. 1 0354102 NPD No. 2 0354103 NPD No. 3 0354900 West Division 0354901 NPD No. 10 0354902 NPD No. 11 0354903 NPD No. 12 S u b-Tota I South/East Field Operations Bureau 0355000 S/E Field Operations Bureau 0355100 South Division 0355101 NPD No. 8 0355102 NPD No. 9 0355900 East Division 0355901 NPD No. 4 0355902 NPD No. 5 0355903 NPD No. 6 0355904 NPD No. 7 Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $240,584 $264,827 $227,571 $436,063 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 1,892,113 2,066,426 1,916,540 1,974,463 24.0 23.0 22.0 22.0 3,436,564 3,958,682 3,726,594 3,881,881 75.0 73.0 69.0 69.0 2,222,003 2,517,607 3,133,160 3,269„904 47.0 44.0 54.0 54.0 2,645,434 3,006,698 3,023,088 3,141,315 51.0 51.0 50.0 50.0 2,398,435 2,132,718 1,870,528 1,928,451 24.0 26.0 22.0 22.0 2,884,592 3,294,053 3,299,557 3,452,262 57,0 58.0 58.0 58.0 2,453,855 2,769,722 2,932,637 3,061,647 47.0 45.0 49.0 49.0 1.844,297 2,208.332 2,236.596 2,344,543 37.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 $20,017,877. $22,219,065 $22,366,271 $23,490,529 365.0 362.0 367.0 369.0 240,584 264,827 341,357 457,707 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 2,011,261 1,822,356 1,590,660 1,640,684 24.0 22.0 19.0 19.0 2,797,899 3,211,733 3,266,118 3,418,823 58.0 57.0 58.0 58.0 3,146,489 3,548,264 3,074,334. 3,205,977 60.0 60.0 50.0 50.0 2,453,410 2,432,517 2,262,234 2,262,954 28.0 28.0 26A 25.0 1,819,094 2,095,055. 1,927,337 2,014,221 35.0 37.0 33.0 33.0 2,367,427 2,646,256 3,028,958 3,165,866 43.0 44.0 52.0 52.0 3,154,507 3,686,518 3,858,819 3,994,543 63.0 65.0 71.0 70.0 1,906,598 2.198.632 2,223,139 2,325,820 38.0 38.0 39.0 39.0 $19,897,269 $21,906,158 $21,572,956 $22,486,595 352.0 354.0 351.0 351.0 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS POLICE FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted GG01 GENERAL Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Special Services Bureau 0356000 Special Services Bureau $268,701 $281,597 $296,556 $307,087 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0356100 Criminal Investigations (CID) 282,025 309,327 306,064 321,861 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 0356101 CID -Major Crimes 1,447,356 1,492,991 1,874,776 1,891,651 23.0 23.0 29.0 28.0 0356102 CID -Auto Theft 1,204,140 1,273,361 1,331,852 1,395,040 26.0 20.0 24.0 24.0 0356103 Violent Personal Crimes (VPC) - Family Violence 2,205,035 2,414,777 949,085 983,312 34.0 35.0 13.0 13.0 0356105 CID -Vice 783,222 980,023 934,120 973,613 15.0 16.0 15.0 15.0 0356106 VPC-Crime Scene Search Unit 1,506,140 1,652,772 971,001 1,010,494 25.0 28.0 15.0 15.0 0356107 VPC-Crimes Against Children Unit 0 0 579,549 603,245 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 0356108 VPC-Sex Crime Registration, Apprehension, and Monitoring Unit 0 0 331,233 344,397 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0356109 VPC-Homicide 0 0 840,012 871,606 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0356200 Special Investigations Division (SID) 129,287 138,412 139,252 144,518 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0356201 SID-Youth 1,066,432 1,130,302 1,176,315 1,223,706 17.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 0356300 Special Operations Division (SOD) - Narcotics 5,897,347 6,490,687 1,429,673 1,471,799 99.0 98.0 16.0 16.0 0356301 SOD-DEA Task Force 13 0 586,976 586,976 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 0356302 SOD -Tarrant County Narcotic Intelligence Coordination Unit 0 0 731,087 762,681 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 0356303 SOD -Special Approach Unit 0 0 479,602 500,665 0.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 0356304 SOD -Gang 0 0 1,624,283 1,644,310 0.0 0.0 27.0 26.0 0356305 SOD -Special Weapons and Tactics 0 0 1,169,682 1,217,073 0.0 0.0 18.0 18.0 0356306 High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area 0 0 495,324 516,387 0.0 0.0 8.0 8.0 0356500 Traffic 4,177,978 4.505.578 5,016.814 5,209,012 64.0 62.0 73.0 73.0 Sub -Total $18,967,676 $20,669,827 $21,263,256 $21,979,433 315.0 312.0 324.0 322.0 Various Expenditures recorded in discontinued cost centers TOTAL $13,318 $0 $0 $0 $80,866,048 $88,195,577 $89,160,708 $92,807,206 1371.0 1372.0 1385.0 1385.0 1-22 POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFFING GENERAL FUND GG01 Center Section Officer Xo3 Detective X04 Sergeant X07 Lieutenant X08 Captain X09 Deiputy Chief X1 o Total 0351000 Administration 2 - 1 - 3 Subtotal 2 0 0 1 0 0 3 Executive Services Bureau 0352000 Executive Services 1 - 1 - 1 3 0352300 Internal Affairs 2 6 1 1 - 10 0352400 Staff Services - - 1 - 1 - 2 0352500 Training Division 8 1 3 2 1 - 15 0362501 Weapons Range 1 - _ - 1 Subtotal 12 1 10 4 3 1 31 Operations Supoort Bureau 0353000 Operations Support - - - 1 - 1 2 0353500 Support Services - - - 1 - 1 0353501 Jail - - 6 - - 6 0353502 K-9 Unit 6 1 1 - 8 0353503 Mounted Patrol 10 1 - - 11 0353600 Air Support 4 = 4 Subtotal 20 0 2 8 1 1 32 NorthWest Field Operations Bureau 0354000 NNW Field Operations - - - 2 - 1 3 0354100 North Division - 14 1 1 1 - 17 0354101 Neighborhood Policing District (NPD) 1 50 3 5 1 - - 59 0354102 NPD 2 45 3 5 1 - - 54 0354103 NPD 3 40 3 6 1 - - 50 0354900 West Division - 14 1 1 1 - 17 0354901 NPD 10 49 3 6 - - - 58 0354902 NPD 11 39 3 6 1 - - 49 0354903 NPD 12 33 3 5 - 41 Subtotal 256 46 35 8 2 1 348 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1-23 POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFFING Center Section Officer X03 Detective X04 Sergeant X07 Lieutenant X08 Captain X09 Deputy Chief X10 Total South/East Field Operations Bureau 0355000 SIE Field Operations - 2 - 1 3 0355100 South Division - 11 1 1 1 - 14 0355101 NPD 8 50 3 5 - - 58 0365102 NPD 9 40 3 6 1 - 50 0355900 East Division - 16 2 1 1 20 0355901 NPD 4 25 3 5 - - 33 0355902 NPD 5 42 3 6 1 52 0355903 NPD 6 60 3 6 1 - 70 0355904 NPD 7 31 3 5 - _ - 39 248 45 36 7 2 1 339 SDecial Services Bureau 0356000 Special Services 1 - - 1 - 1 3 0355100 Criminal Investigations - - - - 1 - 1 0356101 CID -Major Case 9 12 2 1 24 0356102 CID -Auto Theft 1 11 1 1 14 0355103 VPC-Family Violence - 10 1 1 12 0356105 CID -Vice 11 1 1 1 14 0356106 VPC-Crime Scene 12 2 1 - - 15 0356107 VPC-CACU - 7 1 - - 8 0356108 VPC-SCRAM 4 1 - - 5 0356109 VPC-Homicide 10 1 - 11 0356200 Special Investigations - - - - 1 - 1 0356201 SID-Youth 13 - 2 1 - 16 0356300 SOD -Narcotics 1 6 3 1 1 12 0356301 SOD-DEA Task Force 9 - 1 - - 1❑ 0356302 SOD-TCNICU 9 1 2 - 12 0356303 SOD -Special Approach 7 - 1 - 8 0356304 SOD -Gang 19 3 3 1 26 0356305 SOD -SWAT 12 3 2 1 18 0356306 SOD-HIDTA 6 1 - 1 - 8 0356500 Traffic 49 9 7 2 1 _ 68 Subtotal 159 80 30 12 4 1 286 Subtotal -Civil Service 697 172 113 40 12 5 1039 Subtotal -Civilians 346 General Fund Total CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1385 I-24 POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFFING CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND GR79 Center Section Officer XO Detective X04 Sergeant X07 Lieutenant X08 Captain X09 Deputy Chief X 10 Total Gana Graffiti 0356304 Gang Graffiti 8 - - - - - 8 Subtotal 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 Zero Tolerance Teams 0354100 North Division 10 1 1 - - - 12 0354900 West Division 10 1 1 12 0355100 South Division 10 1 1 12 0355900 East Division 10 1 1 12 Subtotal 40 4 4 0 0 0 48 Increase Neighborhood Patrol Officers 0354000 Field Operations 34 - - - - - 34 Subtotal 34 0 0 0 0 0 34 Neighborhood Patrol Districts 0354101 NPD No. 1 - - 1 - - - 1 0354102 NPD No. 2 - 1 1 0355901 NPD No. 4 1 1 2 0355903 NPD No. 6 1 - 1 0355904 NPD No. 7 - 1 1 2 0355101 NPD No. 8 - 1 1 2 0354901 NPD No. 10 - 1 1 2 0354903 NPD No. 12 1 1 - 2 Subtotal 0 0 8 5 0 0 13 School Security Initiative 0356202 School Security Initiative 48 1 3 1 _ - 53 Subtotal 48 1 3 1 0 0 53 Sex Offender Apprehension 0356103 Sex Offender Apprehension 1 1 - - - _ 2 Subtotal 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 Exnand Narcotics Investigation 0356300 Special Operations 10 - _ - - - 10 Subtotal 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 Subtotal -Civil Service 141 6 16 6 0 0 168 Subtotal -Civilians 8 Crime District Total 176 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1-25 POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFFING GRANTS FUND GR76 Officer XO3 Detective X04 Sergeant X07 Lieutenant Xo8 Captain Xo9 Deputy Chief X10 Total Auto Theft Task Force Subtotal -Civil Service 1 1 - 2 Subtotal -Civilians - Drug Enforcement Administration Subtotal -Civil Service - - - Subtotal -Civilians 2 Child Violence Intervention Project Subtotal -Civil Service - - Subtotal -Civilians 1 Domestic Assault Response Team Subtotal -Civil Service - - Subtotal -Civilians 2 Enhanced [Domestic Assault Response Team Subtotal -Civil Service 2 - 2 Subtotal -Civilians - Auto Etching Proqram Subtotal -Civil Service - - - Subtotal -Civilians 2 Sex Offender Monitoring Proqram Subtotal -Civil Service 1 2 3 Subtotal -Civilians 1 Ooeration Spotliqht Proqram Subtotal -Civil Service 2 - - 2 Subtotal -Civilians - All Grants Subtotal -Civil Service 3 5 1 - 9 Subtotal -Civilians 8 Total- All Grants 17 TOTAL STAFFING- ALL FUNDS Subtotal -Civil Service 841 183 129 46 12 5 1216 Subtotal -Civilians 362 TOTAL 1578 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL. BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER ` FIRE GG0110361000:0368000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Fire Department provides protection of life and property from fire, first response for emergency medical service, programs of fire safety and prevention, arson and fire cause investigations, and the dispatching of fire apparatus and personnel to fire scenes and other emergencies. Additionally, the department is responsible for the development and implementation of plans for the protection of life and property, thereby minimizing the effects of a potential disaster. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Personal Services $45,871,088 $49,613,617 $50,426,795 Supplies 1,688,657 1,193,970 1,684,638 Contractual Services 4,078,615 4,098,730 3,897,155 Capital Outlay 167,688 116,900 40,001 Total Allocations $51,806,048 $55,023,217 $56,048,589 Authorized Positions 762.0 763.0 782.0 Adopted Budget 2000-01 $52,946,761 1,684,638 3,897,155 40,001 $58,568,555 782.0 1-27 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET I BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION • Inspections • Investigations • Bomb Squad • Fire safety education • Fire systems testing 36.0 A. P. OPERATIONS • Fire suppression • Emergency management systems 1st response • Pre -tire planning • Operations administration • Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus BUDGET Changes in Resources Million $ 60 FIRE - 782.0 A. Pr ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Centralized personnel, payroll and fiscal administration • Office of Emergency Management 20.0 A. P. HUMAN RESOURCES • Basic fire fighting training • In-service training programs • Emergency medical services training • Safety programs for Fire personnel • Health and fitness 671.0 A. P. 18.0 A. P.. SUPPORT SERVICES • Central supply • Apparatus maintenance and coordination • Support equipment • Fire hose and nozzle maintenance • Building maintenance coordination 12.0 A. P. FIRE ALARM • Incident call takers • Incident dispatching AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 25.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 800- 600- 400 41TIM 0 V V �r W F W, 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 ❑Civil Service Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 1-29 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER FIRE GG01/0361000:0368000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $55,023,217 A.P. 763.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $58,568,555 A.P. 782.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $817,617 for the addition of 14 civil service employees who are staffing Station 40, a new station the City inherited when it annexed the Lake Country Estates area in FY1999-00. B) The adopted budget increases by $222,584 for five civilian personnel added as part of an administrative reorganization of the department. C) The adopted budget increases by $5,085,863 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. D) The adopted budget increases by $320,899 for contributions to employee retirement due to increases in the number of personnel, E) The adopted budget increases by $230,000 for the purchase of safety equipment, including air tanks that are due to expire in FY2000-01. F) The adopted budget decreases by ($200,000) due to the elimination of funds for one-time upgrades to stations in FY1999-00. G) The adopted budget increases by $189,131 for civil service overtime to match the 8 percent increase in civil service salaries granted in FY1999-00 and the 6 percent increase authorized for FY2000-01. Civil service holiday pay increased by $31,609. H) The adopted budget increases by $172,300 for workers' compensation, due to projected cost increases and increases in the number of personnel. 1) The adopted budget increases by $126,000 for fuel cost and rate increases imposed by the City's Equipment Services Division. J) The adopted budget increases by $104,385 due to the new cost for licenses and maintenance of new mobile data computers in Fire Department emergency vehicles. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET FIRE LOSS IN MILLION DOLLARS -� N 11 m co O 1994 ACTUAL 1995 ACTUAL 1996 ACTUAL D 1997 ACTUAL r m - D X N 1998 ACTUAL 1999 ACTUAL 2000 ESTIMATE© 2001 PROJECTED 0 u m r 0 U) C) m z DTI W w DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS FIRE FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted GG01 GENERAL Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Administration 0361000 Administration $1,222,500 $4,716,575 $2,091,246 $4,611,212 9.0 9.0 17.0 17.0 0361010 Emergency Management 391,314 383,977 386,064 386,064 6_0 6_0 5_0 5_0 Sub -Total $1,613,814 $5,100,552 $2,477,310 $4,997,276 15.0 15.0 22.0 22.0 Fire Prevention 0362000 Fire Prevention $3,215,557 $2,989.833 $3.047,003 $3,047,003 37.0 36.0 33.0 33.0 Sub -Total $3,215,557 $2,989,833 $3,047,003 $3,047,003 37.0 36.0 33.0 33.0 Operations 0363500 Administration $576,030 $513,169 $521,653 $521,653 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 0363510 Battalions 38,918,213 39,875,894 42,490,565 42,490,565 642.0 644.0 660.0 660.0 0363520 SCBA 588,775 528,466 797,352 797,352 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Sub -Total $40,083,018 $40,917,529 $43,809,570 $43,809,570 655.0 657.0 672.0 672.0 Fire Alarm 0364500 Fire Alarm $1,996,012 $1,558,095 $1,740,735 $1,740,735 25.0 25.0 26.0 26.0 Sub -Total $1,996,012 $1,558,095 $1,740,735 $1,740,735 25.0 25.0 26.0 26.0 Support Services 0365500 Vehicle Services $1,908,585 $1,828,120 $1,901,460 $1,901,460 9.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 0365510 Supply 373,006 283,527 315,195 315,195 3_0 4`0 5_0 5.0 Sub -Total $2,281,591 $2,111,647 $2,216,655 $2,216,655 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 Fire Human Resources 0368000 Fire Human Resources $2,616,056 $2,345,561 $2.757,316 $2,757,316 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Sub -Total $2,616,056 $2,345,561 $2,757,316 $2,757,316 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 TOTAL $51,806,048 $55,023,217 $56,048,589 $58,568,555 762.0 763.0 782.0 782.0 W. FIRE DEPARTMENT STAFFING Y05 Y11 Y01 Y02 Y03 Y04 Battalion Deputy Center Section Firefighter Engineer Lieutenant Captain Chief Chief Total 0361000 Administration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0361010 Emer. Mgmt. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0362000 Fire Prevention 3 6 9 8 2 1 29 Sub -Total 3 6 9 8 2 1 29 0363500 Operations Admin. 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 0363510 Battalions 332 156 91 63 18 0 660 0363520 SCBA 0 6 1 0 0 0 7 Sub -Total 332 162 92 65 19 1 671 0364500 Alarm 15 5 5 1 0 0 26 Sub -Total 15 5 5 1 0 0 26 03655DO Vehicle Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0355510 Supply 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 Sub -Total 2 1 0 0 Q 0 3 0368000 Fire Training 3 2 3 5 2 1 16 Sub -Total 3 2 3 5 2 1 16 Total Civil Service 355 176 109 79 23 3 745 Total Civilians 37 TOTAL DEPARTMENT STAFFING 782 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER MUNICIPAL COURT GG0110381000:0385000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Municipal Court Department is comprised of five divisions. The Administration Division is responsible for complete departmental management of the remaining four divisions and acts as the liaison with other agencies. Municipal Court is a Court of Record comprised of eight municipal courts that have jurisdiction within the City of Fort Worth's territorial limits over all Class C misdemeanor criminal cases brought under City ordinances and the Texas Penal Code. These cases are punishable by fine only. The Judicial Division is comprised of eight judges, including a Chief Judge and a Deputy Chief Judge. All judges are appointed by the City Council. The Court Clerk is responsible for the collection of fines, community service/Teen Court work programs, the updating and filing of citation information, warrant issuance, management of the City's jury system, the'setting of court dockets, processing civil parking tickets, and other related activities. The Warrant Division is overseen by the City Marshal and is responsible for bailiff duties, oversight of court bailiffs, prisoner bonding and transfer, building security, and warrant and writ services. The division is also responsible for the oversight of officers at the Lake Worth Office, The Lake Worth Patrol Division includes five Deputy City Marshals and one Senior Deputy City Marshal who are responsible for patrolling the approximate 3,560 acres of the Lake Worth recreational area, the Fort Worth Nature Center & Refuge, the leased property neighborhoods, and 14 surrounding City -owned parks. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $4;956,866 I $5,693,053 $6,197,410 $6,305,949 Supplies 333,962 285,066 431,795 431,795 Contractual Services 1,829,728 1,893,706 2,012,169 2,012,169 Capital Outlay 29,494 134,960 138,800 138,800 Total Allocations $7,150,050 $8,006,785 $8,780,174 $8,888,713 Authorized Positions 141.5 150.0 160.0 160.0 1-37 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1-38 MUNICIPAL COURT - 160.0 A. P. JUDICIAL • Non -jury and jury trials • Arraignment Court • Magistrate duties • Teen Court • Recording of court proceedings 10.0 A. P. I ' COURT CLERK • Fine collections • Social service functions • Case preparation and filing • Docket settings • Data entry • Records management • Civil parking • Warrant production • Coordination and verification of warrants 95,0 A. P. ADMINISTRATION • Department management ............ • Liaison with other agencies 6.0 A. P, I-AKE WORTH PATROL CITY MARSHAL • Patrol Lake Worth, Nature • Bailiff duties Center and Refuge, and • Prisoner bonding surrounding City -owned parks • Prisoner transfers • Enforce City ordinances, Texas Building security Water Safety Act, and state laws Warrant service 6.0 A. P. Writ service .,, 43.0 A. P. BUDGET Million $ Changes in Resources 12✓ /% AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 180 - 1999 Q Positions 2000 2001 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 1-39 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER MUNICIPAL COURT GG01/0381000.0385000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $8,006,785 A.P. 150.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $8,888,713 A.P. 160.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $375,631 for the addition of 10 authorized positions, including salaries, benefits, and supplies. Nine of the positions are Deputy City Marshals, who will provide security for the Public Safety and Courts Building through an offsetting transfer from the Municipal Court Security Fund. The tenth position is a Ground Transportation Coordinator that was authorized by City Council on May 23, 2000, to administer taxicab commerce and related services in the City. B) The adopted budget increases by $136,050 for construction services and minor equipment to renovate cash stations and provide ergonomically correct office furniture in the Clerks Division. The renovations will improve access for handicapped individuals, while the furniture will reduce repetitive motion injuries for department employees. C) The adopted budget increases by $228,320 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. D) The adopted budget increases by $88,800 to replace and add motorized vehicles. One patrol boat will be replaced in the Lake Worth Patrol Division through a transfer from the Lake Worth Trust Fund. Two additional police sedans will be purchased for increased warrant service. E) The adopted budget increases by $85,832 for IT Solutions Department charges. Although usage levels will not increase substantially, rates for various services have increased. The majority of the increase is driven by the number of lines printed on reports, maintenance of desktop systems, and mainframe system transactions. F) The adopted budget increases by $59,673 for retirement costs, which are driven by increasing salaries. G) The adopted budget increases by $37,559 for group health charges due to a projected rate increase in FY2000-01. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET .O SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER MUNICIPAL COURT GG01/0381000:0385000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $8,006,785 A.P. 150.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $8,888,713 A.P. 160.0 H) The adopted budget decreases by ($31,000) for budgeted salary savings. Persistent vacancies in the Clerk and Warrants divisions are primarily responsible for this change. 1) The adopted budget decreases by ($30,808) for computer lease payments. The reduction is based on FY1999-00 actual expenditures and the projected number of FY2000-01 computer leases. J) The adopted budget increases by $27,140 for workers' compensation costs, based on historical expenditures and projected claims costs. K) The adopted budget increases by $22,201 for office supply expenses. Recently installed laser printers require toner cartridges and laser printer paper, as opposed to ink cartridges and standard paper used in older printers. Storage boxes, which are heavily used by the department, have tripled in price during the last few fiscal years. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1-43 200000 150000 Z 100000 Q 50000 C MUNICIPAL COURT DUMBER OF WARRANTS CLEARED FY 94-95 THROUGH 00-01 (projected) 1 F4 199 169,654 169,654 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-Ou zuuu-u1 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED FISCAL YEARS DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL COURT FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0381000 Administration 0382000 Judicial 0383000 Court Clerk 0384000 Warrants D384010 Building Security 0385000 Lake Worth Patrol TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,705,531 $2,311,743 $2,154,968 $2,263,507 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 744,724 735,264 816,098 816,098 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 3,101,483 3,049,562 3,455,208 3,455,208 90.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 1,326,735 1,598,779 1,702,027 1,702,027 29.5 33.0 34.0 34.0 0 0 313,089 313,089 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 271,577 311,437 338,784 338,784 6_0 6=0 6_0 6_0 $7,150,050 $8,006,785 $8,780,174 $8,888,713 141.5 150.0 160.0 160.0 Cn DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PUBLIC HEALTH GG01/0501000:0505004 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Public Health Department, which consists of four divisions, is responsible for safeguarding the general public health of the city's residents. The Administration Division supervises the operations of the department. In addition, the Health Promotion section educates the residents of Fort Worth about public health problems and services through advertising and outreach. The Consumer Health Division is responsible for enforcing all City ordinances and state laws pertaining to sanitation. The Animal Control Division is responsible for enforcing all City ordinances and state laws pertaining to animal control. The division operates and maintains the animal control facility completed during FY1997-98, and is undertaking a community education campaign to encourage responsible pet ownership. The Information, Assessment, and Outreach Division is responsible for maintaining data on the overall well-being of the community. The Vital Statistics Section records births, deaths, and adoptions and issues certified copies of vital statistics records as requested. The Information Section provides technical/programming assistance for the departmental information system. Finally, the Outreach Section provides outreach and referrals for service to residents of the City of Fort Worth. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Personal Services $3,872,058 $4.582,218 $4,443,658 Supplies 241,686 197,577 219,417 Contractual Services 1,520,901 1,312,470 1,276,916 Capital Outlay 103,515 56,300 72,000 Total Allocations $5,738,160 $6,148,565 $6,011,991 Authorized Positions I 124.00 I 120.00 1 121.00 Adopted Budget 2000-01 $4, 561, 598 219,417 1,276,916 72,000 $6,129,931 121.00 1-47 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Million $ 8.0-f ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Fiscal services • Health promotion 14.0 A. P. ........:..:........::...:.:::: ,, CONSUMI=R A IMAL CONTROL HEALTH • Food protection •Kennel operations . Permits = Hite investigations • Inspections ............... • Animal investigations . Food handler ATION INFORMATION • Responsible pet education ASSESSMENT AND ownership education • Smoking ordinance OUTREACH enforcement 37.0 A. P. 24.O A. P. :::::.... ,: .. VITAL .:.:.:.: "INFORMATION SUPPORT ASSESSMENT OUTREACH STATISTICS SERVICES SERVICES • Vital records • Data processing . MITOPIMOTOP • Data collection . Community outreach and analysis maintenance 2• 0 A. P. program . Referral for social • Community • Statistics administration services assessment . Assurance of health Data • Data processing 5.0 A. P. 7.0 A. P. care availability 10.0 A. P. 22.O A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources 1 1 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 ID Expenditures 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113 Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 1-49 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER PUBLIC HEALTH GG01/0501000:0505004 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $6,148,565 A.P. 120.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $6,129,931 A.P. 121.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $22,901 in funds budgeted for one additional Animal Control Officer position. B) The adopted budget increases by $117,940 for actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget decreases by ($111,225) in funds budgeted in salary savings, based on historically high vacancies in the department. D) The adopted budget increases by $72,000 for the replacement of an animal control truck and an additional animal control truck for the new Animal Control Officer. E) The adopted budget increases by $22,240 in funds for computer leases. F) The adopted budget decreases by ($12,000) funds budgeted for auto allowances due to the purchase of a cargo van that will be used by the Promotion and Outreach sections of the department, decreasing the need for mileage reimbursement. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENT PUBLIC HEALTH FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Administration 0501000 Administration 0501005 Health Planning and Promotion Sub -Total Environmental Health 0503002 Consumer Health Sub -Total Animal Control 0504001 Animal Control 0504002 Kennel Operations Sub -Total Information, Assessment, and Outreach 0505000 Vital Statistics 0505001 Information Services 0505002 Support Services 0505003 Assessment 0505004 Outreach Sub -Total TOTAL. DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,455,478 $1,520,892 $1,283,327 $1,401,267 12.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 251,175 295.799 291,998 291,998 6_0 6_0 6_0 6_0 $1,706,653 $1,816,691 $1,575,325 $1,693,265 18.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 $1,110,468 $1,080,549 $1,127,701 $1,127,701 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 $1,110,468 $1,080,549 $1,127,701 $1,127,701 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 $827,276 $853,064 $997,108 $997,108 22.0 23.0 25.0 25.0 412,059 478.836 432,286 432,286 12.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 $1,239,335 $1,331,900 $1,429,394 $1,429,394 34.0 36.0 38.0 38.0 $313,081 $348,104 $372,620 $372,620 7.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 156,980 106,483 84,863 84,863 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 99,369 222,995 0 0 2.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 210,346 375,933 351,596 351,596 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 898.977 865,910 1,070,492 1,070.492 26.0 22.0 26.0 26.0 $1,678,753 $1,919,425 $1,879,571 $1,879,571 48.0 46.0 45.0 45.0 $5,738,160 $6,148,565 $6,011,991 $6,129,931 124.0 120.0 121.0 121.0 7 Cil DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY 1-55 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GG01/0521000:0523000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Environmental Management Department is responsible for ensuring that the City is in compliance, or developing means to achieve compliance, with all federal and state environmental regulations. The department consists of five divisions: Administration, Compliance, Water Quality, Air Quality and Geographical Information System (GiS). The Administration Division is responsible for fiscal and managerial oversight of the department. The Compliance Division activities include spill response, household chemical waste collection, and City - generated hazardous waste collection and recycling. The division also handles underground storage tank removals and redemptions, asbestos abatement, and environmental sampling to ensure City compliance with federal, state, and local mandates and regulations. The Water Quality Division is heavily involved in the storm water program and other portions of the Clean Water Act. The Air Quality Division is responsible for implementing programs to fulfill the City's responsibility under the Clean Air Act. As part of a departmental reorganization, the Geographical Information System (GIS) unit of the Water Quality Division has been separated into its own division. The GIS function was established in 1993 to assist the City in compliance with EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) storm water regulations. This division maps the local watersheds and related tributaries, develops and manages user interfaces to collect, analyze and distribute appropriate environmental information to state and federal regulatory agencies, and develops GIS programs that enhance the ability of the City to maintain municipal compliance in the areas of stormwater, air quality, and hazardous materials. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Personal Services $863,487 $893,705 $952,269 Supplies 41,204 30,729 29,759 Contractual Services 292,225 326,638 275,925 Capital Outlay 0 27,000 23,500 Total Allocations $1,196,916 $1,278,072 $1,281,453 Authorized Positions 20.0 19.0 20.0 Adopted Budget 2000-01 $1,005, 988 29,759 275,925 23,600 $1, 335,172 20.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 1-56 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - 20.0 A. P. ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Program implementation • Fiscal management • Operational oversight • Community liaison • Secretarial/clerical support 6.0 A. P. ��� ENVIRONMENTAL �� j 1 MANAGEMENTFUND 1 i 1 1• Disposal projects ' 1• Construction projects 1 I• Engineering/consultant services 1 1 See page S-791 rr rrrrsr ^arrrrrr� - I COMPLIANCE • Environmental assessment • Hazardous waste management • Remediation management • Site evaluations Million $ 2.0�-' 1.5----" 2.0 A. P. WATER QUALITY GEOGRAPHIC . Field inspections INFORMATION SYSTEM • Sampling/monitoring . Mapping technology • Technology development 2.0 A. P. 5.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources 2 1 1 AIR QUALITY • Source investigation • Permit inspections • Emissions evaluation 5.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113 Expenditures I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1OPositions I 1-57 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GG01/0521000:0523000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $1,278,072 A.P. 19.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $1,335,172 A.P. 20.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $68,078 to reflect the transfer of the Energy Manager position, which was previously budgeted in the City Manager's Office. 13) The adopted budget increases by $61,123 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget decreases by ($50,000) in the contractual services budget line -item. This amount will be paid from the Environmental Management Fund. D) The adopted budget increases by $23,500 to purchase one vehicle per the City's Vehicle Replacement Plan. E) The adopted budget increases by $5,524 for additional leased computers as part of the lease exchange program. F) The adopted budget increases by $2,450 in workers' compensation due to the planned use of Workers' Compensation fund balance. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET . CITY.OF FORT WORTH 2000.01 DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0521000 Administration 0521010 GIS 0521520 Compliance 0522000 Water Quality 0523000 Air Quality TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $343,277 $367,068 $438,746 $492,465 5.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 0 0 105,049 105,049 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 214,297 214,999 157,540 157,540 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 467,119 504,345 380,602 380,602 9.0 9.0 5.0 5.0 172,223 191,660 199,516 199,516 4_0 4_0 5_0 5_0 $1,196,916 $1,278,072 $1,281,453 $1,335,172 20.0 19.0 20.0 20.0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 000110010000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The legislative and policy -malting body in Fort Worth's Council -Manager form of government comprise a Mayor and eight (8) City Council members. Since a Charter Amendment in April, 1975, City Council members, with the exception of the Mayor, are elected to represent single -member districts. The Single -Member District Representation Plan became effective as of the City Council election in April, 1977. Responsibilities of the City Council include: 1) the appointment of the City Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, City Internal Auditor, Municipal Court Judges, and various other officials and citizens' boards; and 2) the determination of policy regarding the types and levels of service to be provided by the City. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $403,588 $390,599 $406,937 $471,260 Supplies 36,239 31,200 39,100 39,100 Contractual Services 216,179 218,506 251,147 251,147 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $656,006 $640,305 $697,184 $761,507 �. Authorized Positions 4.0 4.0 I 4.0 4.0 J-1 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET J-2 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. - 4.0 A. P. MAYOR AND COUNCIL • Legislative and policy -making responsibilities • City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary, Municipal Court Judges, and City Auditor appointments • Boards and commissions appointments BUDGET Thouand $ Changes in Resources onn r 4.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1991 1998 1999 2000 2001 1aPositions I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113 Expenditures I J-3 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FUNDICENTER G G01 /0010000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $640,305 A.P. 4.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $761,507 A.P. 4.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $58,959 for scheduled temporary employees as a result of an approved salary increase for City Council assistants. B) The adopted budget increases by $23,866 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $7,640 for leased computers as part of the lease exchange program. D) The adopted budget increases by $6,079 for information system charges to meet the IT Solutions Department's FY2000-01 schedule of rates and charges. E) The adopted budget increases by $6,000 for operating supplies based on actual FY1999-00 expenditures. F) The adopted budget increases by $3,100 in machinery and equipment based on actual FY1999-00 expenditures. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET CITY OF FORT WORTH':2U00-01` BUDGET A�� DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER CITY MANAGER GG01/0021000:0028010 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The City Manager's Office is responsible for administering the programs and policies established by the City Council. The City Manager's Office directs and coordinates the operations of City departments and informs and advises the City Council regarding City transactions and issues, including existing conditions and future requirements. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $2,978,207 $3,274,296 $3,285,627 $3,468,473 Supplies 77,157 58,691 82,741 82,741 Contractual Services 1,080,665 1,022,162 1,248,864 1,248,864 Capital Outlay 0 2,000 1,500 1,500 Total Allocations $4,136,029 $4,357,149 $4,618,732 $4,801,578 Authorized Positions 54.0 54.0 I 55.0 55.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET W. I ACTION CENTER • Citizen complaint resolution 4.0 A. P. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE . News releases Newsletters 4.0 A. P. r GABLES «. COMMUNICATION j ISee Page S-51 1 rrr rr r•w •r•rI' Million $ 5.0--,-,J CITY MANAGER - 55.0 A. P. CITY MANAGER • Central management for all departments • Interpretation/implementation of City Council policy • Business community liaison 1.0 A. P. ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLERICAL SUPPORT • Departmental assignments • Advisory boardslcommissions • Special projects • Budget preparation • Clerical support supervision • Counc€l agenda preparation 17.0 ECONOMIC BUDGET OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE • Annual budget preparation • Program development/ • Expenditure/revenue implementation monitoring • Fort Worth Works • Management studies • Research projects 5.0 A. P. 8.0 A. P. MINORITYIWOMEN -ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMIC BUSINESS ANALYSIS UNIT DIVERSIFICATION ENTERPRISE • Review of operations • Strategy 2000 • Bidder certification City-wide • International Center • Contract monitoring 5.0 A. P. 5.0 A. P. 6.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength B0--' 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1El Expend ltures 1 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES J-g DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CITY MANAGER GG01/0021000.0028010 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $4,357,149 A.P. 54.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $4,801,578 A.P. 55.0 A) The adopted budget decreases by ($73,729) due to the deletion of the Utility Administrator position, This position has been transferred to the Environmental Management Department. B) The adopted budget increases by $63,759 in the Public Information Division for the addition of an Information Systems Coordinator, which had previously been budgeted in the IT Solutions Department budget. C) The adopted budget decreases by ($63,428) due to the deletion of the Business Diversity Coordinator in the M i norityfVVo men's Business Enterprise Division. D) The adopted budget increases by $57,852 for the addition of one staff person and necessary resources to address the issue of a Day Labor Center in the City of Fort Worth, E) The adopted budget decreases by ($55,559) due to the deletion of the Economic Development Specialist position in the Business Assistance Center Division. F) The adopted budget increases by $41,214 for the addition of a Management Analyst I for revenue analysis of telecommunication franchises. G) The adopted budget increases by $194,177 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. H) The adopted budget increases by $86,748 in IT Solutions charges due to rate increases and full implementation of the lease exchange program in all divisions of the City Manager's Office. 1) The adopted budget increases by $80,349 for the addition of the Neighborhood Capacity Coordinator to the General Fund, in order to release grant funds for other expenditures. J) The adopted budget increases by $38,000 in funds budgeted for facility rental at the International Center due to a new lease agreement. K) The adopted budget increases by $29,890 in funds budgeted in group health due to anticipated rate increases in FY2000-01. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET CITY OF FORT: WORTH: `20M.01BUDGET DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0021000 Administration 0022000 Action Center 0023000 MinorityNVomen Business Enterprise Economic Development 0024000 Economic Development 0024010 Fort Worth Works Sub -Total 0025000 Public Information Office 0026000 Organizational Analysis Unit 0027000 Budget Office Economic Diversification 0028000 Business Assistance Center 0028010 International Center Sub -Total TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,457,663 $1,655,868 $1,624,988 $1,807,834 16.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 $173,064 $186,405 $217,051 $217,051 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $431,048 $381,868 $393,802 $393,802 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 $206.140 $220,650 $265,166 $265,166 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 103,392 86,043 97,103 97,103 2_0 2_0 1_0 1_0 $309,532 $306,693 $362,269 $362,269 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 $468,107 $470,247 $559,121 $559,121 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 $303,880 $318,279 $315,510 $315,510 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 $432,027 $459,754 $520,098 $520,098 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 $206,285 $219,547 $184,485 $184,485 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 354,423 358,488 441,408 441,408 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 $560,708 $578,035 $625,893 $625,893 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 $4,136,029 $4,357,149 $4,618,732 $4,801,578 54.0 54.0 55.0 55.0 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER INTERNAL AUDIT GG0110101000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Internal Audit Department is charged with conducting financial, fiscal compliance, and financial procedure audits of all City departments, officers, agencies, and programs under the direction and control of the City's Internal Auditor, who is appointed by the City Council. The department also performs other activities as specified by the City Council. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $649,781 $696,947 $700,991 $736,987 Supplies 4,830 7,220 7,220 7,220 Contractual Services 79,707 103,019 124,409 124,409 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $734,318 $807,186 $832,620 $868,616 Authorized Positions 14.0 15.0 15.0 I 15.0 J-15 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET J-16 INTERNAL. AUDIT" - 15.0 A. P. (GENERAL FUND 11.0 A. P.) (GRANT FUND 1.5 A. P.) (BOND FUND 2.5 A. P.) ADMINISTRATION . Departmental management 3.0 A. P. PROPRIETARY FUNDS GRANTlBOND FUNDS GENE RAL FUND . Financial audits • Grant monitoring • Financial audits • Operational audits • Financial audits • Operational audits 2.5 A. P. ` Contract audits . CDBG audits 3.5 A. P 4.0 A. P. Thousand $ ann./ BUDGET Changes in Resources 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 18-" 1 OTHER AUDITS • Special projects • Assistance to external auditors • EDP audits 2.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 I El Expenditures In Positions f SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER INTERNAL AUDIT GG01/0101000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $807,186 A.P. 15.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $868,616 A.P. 15.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $40,040 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. B) The adopted budget increases by $20,555 for computer leases and maintenance as part of the lease exchange program. C) The adopted budget increases by $5,757 for group health insurance expenses, based on Risk Management projections for FY2000-01. D) The adopted budget increases by $4,381 for retirement contributions. NINVA CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET SS. DEPARTMENTAL_ MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED.` 1,99849 1999 00 2000-01 CITY OF''FORT WORTH.2000-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY f, DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER F CITY SECRETARY GG001/0111000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The City Secretary, appointed by the City Council, is responsible for the supervision of the Office of the City Secretary, the administration of all elections and the maintenance of the minutes from City Council meetings and other official City records. Due to the Office's function as a central repository for a wide variety of municipal records and information, the staff also performs research and fills requests for information from the City Council, City staff, and citizens. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $314,028 $354,159 $366,759 $378,158 Supplies 11,152 7,500 7,500 7,500 Contractual Services 94,039 95,744 109,426 109,426 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $419,219 $457,403 $483,685 $495,084 Authorized Positions I 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 J-21 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Thousand $ 60 50 40 30 20 10 8 CITY SECRETARY *Preparation and maintenance of official City records 8.0 A. P. I ELECTIONS 1•Oversight of Election Process 1 I I I I BUDGET Changes in Resources 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 [Expenditures I AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 i13Positions I J-23 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER CITY SECRETARY GG01/0111000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $457,403 A.P. 8.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $495,084 A.P. 8.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $35,222 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. B) The adopted budget increases by $13,005 to reflect the IT Solutions Department's established schedule of rates and charges for FY2000-01. C) The adopted budget increases by $3,846 for FY2000-01 computer leases. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL: MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1998-99 1999-flfl..' 200001 CITY OF FOR DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER LAW GG0110121000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Department of Law, under the direction of the City Attorney, is responsible for administration of all legal affairs of the City; representation in all suits, litigation and hearings; preparation of ordinances, contracts, and all other legal documents; and the rendering of legal advice and opinions for the City Council, City Manager and City departments. Allocations Personal Services Supplies Contractual Services Capital Outlay Total Allocations Authorized Positions Actual Adopted 1998-99 1999-00 $2, 387, 321 49,865 136,834 I $2.523, 707 56,000 149,617 0 Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 2000-01 2000-01 $2,626,505 95,640 283,955 0 $2,574,020 $2,729,324 $3,006,100 38.0 38.0 40.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET $2,797,575 170,196 283,955 0 $3,251,726 40.0 J-27 MIK-2 Million S LAW - 40.0 A. P. CITY ATTORNEY 1.0 A. P. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 1.0 A. P. I LITIGATION I ADMINISTRATIVE , , PROSECUTION ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT STAFF 7.0 A. P. 7.0 A. P. 6.o A. P. 6.0 A. P. 12.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1El Expenditures 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 I l7 Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES J-29 DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER LAW GG01/0121000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED. $2,729,324 A.P. 38.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $3,251,726 A.P. 40.0 A) The adopted budget increases by two additional positions and a corresponding $152,215 increase in salaries for a Chief Litigator and Legal Secretary for the Litigation Section. The additional staff will increase the department's ability to be more aggressive in trying cases. E) The adopted budget increases by $94,250 for training of attorneys and use of Westlaw online research resources. This will allow the department to remain current with the latest legislation that may impact the City. C) The adopted budget increases by $74,556 for furniture and office equipment for aesthetic and ergonomic needs. D) The adopted budget increases by $57,522 for technology improvements, including software that will make tracking of cases and document preparation more efficient. E) The adopted budget increases by $18,987 in group health costs due to a projected increase in rates in FY2000-01. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET �� � £ �`isf yi� u�t � �� k��4 ���� �t� $`�'sf �""Y�` {� ,K >�.;w roc: NF hk� 9. �' ?�" '�'� �i� �sc�� ray Yea e ��� S� � �� r2� �� �� ��€ ��� jYz� s �� �� �a+yi DEPARTMENTAL MEASURES..ACTUAL..::..ESTIMATED PROJECTED.':.. . 1998-99; 1999-00 2000-01 O©rnan4, r-- ^fnncehc &iii,^a fidlil lif"r 4e ri','nr rlicri iccbrl I .:'4R0% Ono/ DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER FINANCE GG0110131010:0137010 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Finance Department has general responsibility for the financial administration of the City. These duties are performed by the following divisions: Administration, Accounting, Purchasing, Treasury Administration, Financial Systems Administration, and Intergovernmental Affairs and Grants Management. The Administration Division is responsible for providing overall planning and control to the other elements of the department. It also supervises the sale of municipal bonds and the preparation of the City's financial reports. The Accounting Division maintains the general ledger, payroll, accounts payable, grant accounting, Fixed Assets Inventory Tracking System (FATS), and certain accounts receivable for the City in an accounting system conforming to City Charter requirements and to established municipal accounting principles. The Purchasing Division provides centralized purchasing for all City departments and disposes of obsolete or surplus materials/equipment and confiscated property. The Treasury Division manages the City's investment portfolio and is responsible for primary billing, collection of general revenues, bank deposits, and cash management. The Financial Systems Administration Division is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the financial management system (MARS). The Intergovernmental Affairs and Grants Management Division coordinates the development of the City's federal and state legislative program, provides staff presence in Austin during sessions of the Texas Legislature, and administers the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), which includes budget development, contract preparation with subgrantees, contract monitoring of federal funds, and grant research on CDBG related grants. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $2,407,919 $2,724,765 $2,910,008 $3,056,975 Supplies 112,293 74,940 76,338 76,338 Contractual Services 1,930,650 1,758,154 1,846,688 1,846,688 Capital Outlay 64,657 0 0 0 Total Allocations $4,515,519 $4,557,859 $4,833,034 $4,980,001 Authorized Positions 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET MR J-36 FINANCE -- 7 .0 A. P. GENERAL FUN® r�60.0 A. P. (GRANT FUN® 15yI .0 A. ■ .) ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Financial reporting supervision • Bond sale supervision • Records management 6,0A. R- ACCOUNTING PURCHASING TREASURY FINANCIALSYSTEMS INTERGOVERN- ADMINISTRATION MENTAL AFFAIRS • Grant and non -grant • Centralized • Bank deposits financial transaction purchasing and • Cash management • Financial Management .Governmental and maintenance and disposition of City . Manage City's Systems (MARS) review property investment portfolio - • System design and legislative affairs • Central payment 14.0 A. P. Primary billing and development 3.0 A. P. processing • Payroll collection of general revenues 6.0A. P. ,_—rrrL___�.,, administration "' GRANTS 1 8.0 A. P. = 1 MANAGEMENT 1 23.0 A. P. I 1• Contract management Is Grant research and 1 development 1 �• Community I Development Block 1 1 Grant 1 1• Housing Opportunity for, 1 People with AIDS 1 �• Emergency Shelter 1 Grant Program I I• HOME funds 1 1 1 1 15.0A, P,I rrr.w rrr rrrr� BUDGET AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Resources Changes in Strength Million $ 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 DExpenditures I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 IOPositions ! J-37 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER FINANCE GG01/0131010:0137010 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $4,557,859 A.P. 60.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $4,980,001 A.P. 60.0 A) The adopted budget decreases by ($27,248) due to elimination of an Account Clerk position in the Accounting Division. B) The adopted budget increases by $373,184 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $49,676 to reflect increased charges per IT Solutions Department's established FY 2000-01 schedule of rates and charges. D) The adopted budget increases by $26,259 as part of a Citywide program to replace existing purchased computers with leased ones. E) The adopted budget increases by $15,500 for treasury annual investment consultation fees and records management software consultation fees. F) The adopted budget increases by $7,000 for travel expenses. Almost 50 percent of proposed travel expenses are budgeted for legislative liaison activities in Austin. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENT FINANCE FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0131010 Administration 0132010 Accounting 0133000 Purchasing 0134010 Treasury Administration 0135010 Financial Systems 0137010 Intergovernmental Affairs and Grants Management TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $354,651* $1,955,383 $1,934,820 $2,100,627 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 997,130 977,397 1,145,955 1,092,255 25.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 641,490 638,471 607,117 607,117 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 512,780 465,623 513,925 513,925 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 1,772,332* 279,718 304,154 339,014 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 237,018 241,267 327,063 327,063 3_0 3_0 3;0 3_0 $4,515,519 $4,557,859 $4,833,034 $4,980,001 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 * In FY1998-99, IT Solutions Department's charges of nearly 1.4 million to Finance Department was shifted from Administration Division to Financial Systems Division. DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER HUMAN RESOURCES GG0110141000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Human Resources Department is charged with administering the City's compensation and fringe benefits program, preparing and revising job classifications and maintaining employee records. Departmental functions also include recruitment of qualified applicants, particularly minority candidates, for all City positions; development and administration of valid employment selection instruments; evaluation and referral of qualified applicants to departments; training needs assessment; management and employee development opportunities orchestration; City affirmative action 1 equal opportunity program and grievance appeal process monitoring; interpretation of and employee counseling regarding the City's personnel rules and regulations; provision of personnel policy revision recommendations to the City Manager; counseling for and referral .of employees with substance abuse or other personal problems; and volunteer recruitment and placement. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $1,956,264 $2,125,404 $2,197,737 $2,318,545 Supplies 35,998 37,450 41,650 41,650 Contractual Services 521,245 537,862 588,236 588,236 Capital Outlay 0 25,000 0 0 Total Allocations $2,513,507 $2,725,716 $2,827,623 $2,948,431 lAuthorized Positions 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 J-43 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET J-44 HUMAN RESOURCES - 0 ADMINISTRATION . Overall department management and coordination • Civil Service administration • Liaison with City departments 5.0 A. P. I PROGRAM PROGRAM DELIVERY INFORMATION SERVICES & HUMAN &ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES RECORDS MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION , Consultant services • Employment records and Information • Employee assistance program • Test development • Employment services systems . Employee relations division • Job analysis and validation • Volunteer services • Personnel rules and regulations . Training and develo ment studies • Civil Service testing 12.0 A. P. • Job classifications I • Fringe benefits --"'""""""'"'"--1 TEMPORARY LABOR • Pay$ Administration I I 5.0 A. P. ISee Page R-67 ! �rrrr . . . i i . . r . . .1 BUDGET Changes in Resources Million $ -- --11 P 5.0 A. P. 8.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113 Positions I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 IDExpenditures I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES d-45 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER HUMAN RESOURCES GG01/0141000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $2,725,716 A.P. 35.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $2,948,431 A.P. 35.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $253,264 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. B) The adopted budget increases by $42,554 for computer leases due to the FY1999- 00 replacement of all department -owned computers with lease equipment. C) The adopted budget increases by $25,340 for retirement costs based on salary increases. D) The adopted budget decreases by ($25,000) due to the elimination of the FY1999-00 allocation of funds for the purchase of the latest Sigma applicant tracking system upgrade. E) The adopted budget increases by $21,167 for scheduled temporaries to offset salary costs associated with the overage position for the Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) Coordinator until it is absorbed within the authorized departmental strength upon the retirement of a Human Resource Manager in the spring of 2001. Monies budgeted for actual scheduled temporary expenditures decrease by ($15,000); however, the net increase results from the $36,167 budgeted to offset salary expenditures for the overage position. F) The adopted budget increases by $14,624 for workers' compenstion based on projected FY2000-01 costs. G) The adopted budget decreases by ($10,250) for workshops and retreats due to anticipated FY2000-01 expenditure reductions. Reductions are expected because FY1999-00 expenditure levels were driven up by start-up costs for the Leadership Development Program. H) The adopted budget increases by $9,859 for group health charges based on projected FY2000-01 rate increases. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET a CITY'.OF FORT'WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER RISK MANAGEMENT GG0110150000:0153000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Risk Management Department serves as a focal point in coordinating loss identification, reduction, and prevention programs. The City contracts with a private firm to provide occupational health services, which include administering the City's Alcohol and Substance Abuse Screening Program; providing physical classification information to the Human Resources Department; and helping to decrease the City's expenses on minor work -related injuries, lost -time injuries, and Workers' Compensation claims. The Employee Benefits Assistance Program provides services related to health care issues and benefits to both active and retired employees, and also seeks to improve communication between management and employees by providing support to the Employee and Retiree Benefits Advisory Committees. This section also assists in troubleshooting benefits -related problems. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $571,394 $659,125 $672,467 $715,008 Supplies 17,679 15,750 14,930 14,930 Contractual Services 239,741 290,632 305,369 305,369 Capital Outlay 14,812 Total Allocations $843,626 Authorized Positions 12.0 0 0 0 $965,507 $992,766 $1,035,307 13.0 13.0 13.0 J-49 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET J-50 I COMMERCIAL AND SELF INSURANCE PROGRAMS • Property and casualty insurance administration • Claims and litigation program administration 4.5 A. P. ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management 2.5<A R I INSURANCE FUNDS I OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH EMPLOYEES' AND RETIREES' I AND SAFETY HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE I I IlSee page S-1 ' • Safety training BENEFITS ---------- • Loss control training Administration of health and life • Administration of workers' insurance programs and benefits compensation insurance programs • Occupational health services 1.0 A' R 5.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources 1 1 0.75--' 0.50--, 0.25f 0.00 , 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Expenditures AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 10Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES J-51 DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER RISK MANAGEMENT GG01/0150000:0153000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $965,507 A.P. 13.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $1,035,307 A.P. 13.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $49,186 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. B) The adopted budget increases by $11,396 for occupational health service expenses. The costs of drug screening are projected to increase above current levels. Newly hired Fire and Police employees must also undergo Hepatitis series immunization and re- boostering. C) The adopted budget increases by $8,441 for information technology charges. The IT Solutions Department projects an increase in rates for various services in FY2000-01. D) The adopted budget decreases by ($6,600) for contracted information technology vendor services. Funds budgeted in FY1999-00 for a one-time relocation to the Monroe Street annex have been spent and are no longer needed for FY2000-01. CITY OF FORT NORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET CITY. >OFFORT'WORT.H !2000-01 'BUDOET DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0150000 Administration 0151000 Occupational Health Clinic 0153000 Benefits Assistance Program 0157120 Commercial 1 Self -Insurance TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $670,654 $742,339 $754,002 $796,543 11.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 121,729 171,430 182,826 182,826 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51,214 51,738 55,938 55,938 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 29 0 0 0 0_0 00.0 0_0 0_0 $843,626 $965,507 $992,766 $1,035,307 12.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 J-57 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER NON -DEPARTMENTAL 0001 /0901000:0909801 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Non -Departmental records all costs involved for expenditure items that are not exclusively within the programmatic responsibilities of any one General Fund department. Non -Departmental accounts are included for such expenditure items as: the annual audit, City insurance, bus pass expense, litigation costs, City cash -match grant contributions, citywide dues and memberships, tuition reimbursement for General Fund employees, consultant fees, contributions to other agencies, debt service and retire mentlterminaI leave. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $7,567,267 $6,698,447 $8,014,474 $8,014,474 Supplies 58,153 6,629 16,650 16,650 Contractual Services 17,922,676 16,238,604 26,198,024 17,606,180 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Debt Service 48,134,009 45,989,907 46,930,973 46,930,973 Total Allocations $73,682,105 $68,933,587 $81,160,121 $72,568,277 Authorized Positions l 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 I 3.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET i OFFICE SERVICES 1 1 NOWDEPARTMENTAL i oSee page R-53 r___-a.____®-_-_-1 CONTRACTUAL ...... ,. ... . ....... . ... ....... . .... ...... .... . .COMMUNITY OUR CITY, OUR RISK. MANAGEMENT a .. EMPLOYEE SERVICES AGENCY CHILDREN BENEFIT SUPPORT Self-insurance PROGRAMS • Annual audit • Coordinate with • Commercial insurance • Grant cash match + Tarrant Council on i F.W.I•S.D, to promote . Claims and litigation = Tuition • Consultant fees Alcoholism and Drug youth as valuable . Retiree health insurance _ reimbursement • Downtown Fort Abuse contributors to society. ,.....:... .:.. ...........: program Worth • Tarrant County _ A. P. Employee • Ambulance Youth Collaboration = ......... ......... .............•...,3:D enhancement • Tarrant Appraisal • Women's Center programs District Rape Crisis Services • Retirement and • Transfer payments • Women's Haven terminal leave • University of North • Corporate Texas Health Champions Science Center ` Youth As Resources • Mental Health • Alliance for Children Council + Crime Prevention • Neighborhood Arts - Resource Center Council • Tarrant County Challenge Inc. Military Recognition Council ............. Million $ 100-X 80--, 40--"" BUDGET Changes in Resources 4-l"' 3-1-' AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength DEBT V IICE ER,. , 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Expenditures 1997 1998 1999 2000 13 Positions 2001 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES J-59 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER NON -DEPARTMENTAL GG0110901000:0909801 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED BUDGET 1999-00 ADOPTED: $68,933,587 A. P. 3.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $72,568,277 A. P. 3.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $1,332,994 for insurance costs for retirees. S) The adopted budget increases by $941,066 in funds budgeted for debt service due to reduction in the use of Debt Service Fund reserves. C) The adopted budget increases by $502,817 in funds budgeted for the General Fund's portion for the implementation of a Constituent Complaint Tracking System, and a comprehensive efficiency study to be conducted on the Equipment Services Division of the City Services Department. In addition, for the payment to the Historic Preservation Commission and for the Sister Cities International core expenses. D) The adopted budget increases by $309,670 in information and technology costs for the implementation of a new budget system. E) The adopted budget increases by $275,000 in election costs for the upcoming Mayor and City Council elections due to take place in May, 2001. F) The adapted budget increases by $268,525 for litigation expense. G) The adopted budget decreases by ($210,075) in technology costs due to the completion of the Year 2000 Project and Network Implementation Plan. H) The adopted budget decreases by ($181,930) in unemployment compensation due to the planned use of Unemployment Compensation's fund balance. 1) The adopted budget increases by $160,470 in dues and memberships for the funding of the Slack and Hispanic Chambers of Commerce and $20,000 for the Mental Health Council. These expenses are offset by cancellation of membership with Congressional Quarterly of ($12,500) and a reduction in the City's membership with the DIFW Regional Film Commission of ($20,000). CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET p 7 , y< � y. ..., w �?>� ,:, -y ¥ ._ � � . . � �> «� yy �§� 7 y �� - : d ?� � \ / < , . , 2 . ? : a. p � ! 2 : ` `�� ° �« � \1 . � ». � y�. :. y \ w§ � yy \. . : y , � . � /�� ? » « »� : > � . . . . � \`� , c � � ` �� ��� . « ; DEPARTMENT NON -DEPARTMENTAL FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0901000 Annual Audit 0901501 G.F. - Self Insurance 0901502 G.F. - Commercial Insurance 0901506 G.F. - Retiree Health Insurance Contribution 0901507 G.F. - Unemployment Compensation 0902501 G.F. - Electricity 0903001 Claims/Litigation 0904510 City Memberships Texas Municipal League NCTCOG U.S. Conference of Mayors National League of Cities North Texas Commission D/FW Regional Film Commission Public Technologies Inc. DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $182,000 $207,000 $200,000 $200,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $293,316 $259,431 $296,065 $296,065 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $363,579 $434,889 $531,895 $531,895 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $3,557,727 $3,997,714 $5,330,708 $5,330,708 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $211,850 $230,195 $48,265 $48,265 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $6,547,195 $7,000,105 $7,000,105 $7,000,105 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $2,836,000 $2,846,496 $3,067,400 $3,067,400 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $16,424 $16,424 $17,033 $17,033 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49,050 49,050 51,615 51,615 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9,487 9,500 9,900 9,900 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14,643 15,229 15,366 15,366 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41,183 41,693 42,870 42,870 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 61,800 64,900 64,900 44,900 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C_ DEPARTMENT NON -DEPARTMENTAL FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Mental Health Council The Metropolitan Black Chamber of Commerce The Hispanic Chamber of Commerce The Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce USA News Network Congressional Quarterly Texas Cities Coalition on Franchised Utility Issues City/FW Chamber/Tarrant County Legislature International City/County Management Association Sub -Total 0904600 Tuition Reimbursement 0905500 Consultant Fees Indirect Cost Study State Representation Federal Representation Complaint Tracking System 1-35 Corridor Coalition Virginia M. Mayer Consultant Citizen Survey Bank Fees Budget System DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0 0 20,000 20,000 0.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,500 2,500 80,260 80,260 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12,500 12,500 95,210 95,210 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,625 3,039 3,039 3,039 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,300 3,300 3,468 3,468 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12,500 12,510 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 14,850 15,485 15,485 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,387 3,000 3,000 3,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 5,000 5.000 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $246,899 $261,995 $440,646 $420,646 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $168,628 $163,000 $163,000 $163,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $37,125 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68,000 71,000 76,500 76,500 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 193,596 193,596 189,000 189,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 167,000 167,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30,000 30,000 15,000 15,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 15,000 15,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 25,000 25,000 25.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 309,670 309,670 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DEPARTMENT NON -DEPARTMENTAL FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Sister Cities International Historic Preservation Council Neighborhood Arts Council Law Enforcement Development Block Grant Match University of North Texas Equipment Services Study Trolley Linkage Project Sub -Total 0905501 SWBT Consultant Fees 0905503 Our City, Our Children 0905515 Sesquicentennial/Timeline Project 0905600 Ambulance Authority 0905700 Tarrant Appraisal District 0905800 Public Improvement Districts 0906200 Other Contributions Women's Haven Women's Center Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0 0 0 60,000 0 0 0 68,817 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 250,000 250,000 250,000 280,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 155,396 180,000 180,000 180,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 177,000 177,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 100,000 0 0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $759,117 $1,164,596 $1,719,170 $1,877,987 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $26 $0 $0 $0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $167,350 $90,807 $185,100 $185,100 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $89,955 $0 $12,255 $12,255 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $1,280,370 $1,280,205 $1,311,021 $1,311,021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $1,252,574 $1,253,364 $1,231,910 $1,231,910 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $310,612 $315,343 $329,175 $329,175 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L W CS DEPARTMENT NEON -DEPARTMENTAL FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description Tarrant County Youth Collaboration Corporate Champions Collaborative Leadership Council Crime Prevention Resource Center Youth as Resources MUSCLE Alliance for Children Imagination Celebration Tarrant County Veterans Council Tarrant County Challenge Incorporated Sub -Total 0906300 IT Solutions Networking Project 0908000 Debt Service 0909101 Elections 0909103 Special Transfers Engineering Solid Waste Sales Tax ADA Projects Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 5,000 5,000 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51,639 61,438 61,438 61,439 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25,000 25,000 25,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 5,000 0 5,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 10,000 10,000 51,000 0.0 0_0 0^0 0.0 $351,639 $411,438 $406,438 $447,439 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $25,854 $210,075 $0 $0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $48,134,009 $45,989,907 $46,930,973 $46,930,973 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $187,012 $0 $275,000 $275,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $2,757,649 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 190,649 194,953 201,891 201,891 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58,196 100,000 100,000 100,000 0_0 0.00 0_0 0_0 $3,007,494 $354,953 $361,891 $361,891 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DEPARTMENT NON -DEPARTMENTAL FUND GG01 GENERAL Center Center Description 0909500 Employee Enhancement Programs PAYS Service Awards Clerical Conference Commission on the Status of Women Mayor's Committee on Persons with Disabilities MLKIJuneteenth Bus Pass Other Sub -Total 0909800 Compensation Sub -Total 0909801 Terminal Leave TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $22,074 $22,074 $22,074 $22,074 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,355 14,000 14,000 14,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,270 8,000 8,000 8,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,072 4,000 4,000 4,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 936 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 475 3,000 3,000 3,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34,302 0 0 0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $80,484 $62,074 $62,074 $62,074 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $0 $8.771,662 $00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $0 $8,771,662 $0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $3,628.415 $2.400,000 $2,485.368 $2,485.368 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $73,682,105 $68,933,587 $81,160,121 $72,568,277 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 NON -DEPARTMENTAL CENTER DESCRIPTIONS PROM CENTER DESCRIPTION 1999-00 2000-01 ADOPTED ADOPTED BUDGET BUDGET Women's Center $75,000 $75,000 Provides counseling and case management for women in crisis and transition. Also provides job training, rape crisis intervention and prevention. Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse $50,000 $50,000 Strives to improve the overall quality of life in Tarrant County by reducing substance abuse through education, prevention, and intervention referral efforts. Tarrant County Youth Collaboration $15,000 $15,000 Promotes safe and nurturing communities that foster the positive development of each child's potential through advocacy, collaboration, and youth/adult partnerships. Corporate Champions $10,000 $10,000 Serves youth to provide, through a program of informal education, opportunities for youth to realize their potential and to function effectively as caring, self -directed individuals responsible for themselves and others, Collaborative Leadership Council $5,000 $5,000 Brings together representatives from each of Fort Worth's essential policy making institutions to identify common challenges and collaborative solutions to improve service and conserve public resources in the community. Crime Prevention Resource Center $55,000 $55,000 Coordinates and implements strategies to prevent and reduce crime and violence in the City of Fort Worth with an emphasis on gangs and youth crime issues. Youth As Resources $5,000 $5,000 Provides small grants to young people to design and implement projects to meet the needs of the community. MUSCLE $5,000 $0 Mayors United on Safety, Crime, and Law Enforcement; an alliance of urban Texas cities to reduce crime. Members include Fort Worth, Arlington, Austin, Corpus Christi, Dallas, El Paso, Houston, and San Antonio. Alliance for Children $61,438 $61,439 Strives to lessen the emotional trauma to child abuse victims and to improve the justice system response to child abuse by uniting efforts of public agencies and enlisting community support. Imagination Celebration $25,000 $25,000 Arts education program to introduce students to arts such as ballets, museums, gardens, zoos, and other organizations. Tarrant County Challenge Inc. $10,000 $51,000 An alliance between public and private organization which assist young persons with drug and alcohol addiction as well as helping families cope with these problems. NON -DEPARTMENTAL (CENTER DESCRIPTIONS AII.T.] CENTER DESCRIPTION 1999-00 2000-01 ADOPTED ADOPTED BUDGET BUDGET 0901000 Annual Audit $207,000 $200,000 Funds allocated as payment to external auditors (KPMG-Peat Marwick) for the audit of the City's financial records in preparation of the City's Annual Financial Report. 0901501 Self Insurance $259,431 $296,065 Self-insurance Premiums for General Fund departments, 0901502 Commercial Insurance $434,889 $531,895 Budget requirements for Commercial Insurance premiums for all types of insurance on property and equipment as identified by Risk Management. 0901506 Retiree Health Insurance Contribution $3,997,714 $5,330,708 Funds Allocated for health benefits for retirees. 0901507 Unemployment Compensation $230,195 $48,265 Funds allocated to unemployment for General Fund employees. 0902501 Electricity $7,000,105 $7,000,105 Funds allocated as payment for electricity for General Fund departments. 0903001 Claims/Litigation $2,846,496 $3,067,400 Allocation of funds to pay claims and lawsuits for General Fund departments. 0904510 CITY MEMBERSHIPS Texas Municipal League $16,424 $17,033 Services the needs and advocates the interests of its members. The purpose is to render services which individual cities have neither the money nor strength to do alone, North Central Texas COG $49,050 $51,615 State -designated regional planning organization serves 16 county areas; Fort Worth has a seat on the board. U.S. Conference of Mayors $9,500 $9,900 Official nonpartisan organization of cities with a population of 30,000 or more. It aids the development of effective national urban policy, strengthens federal/city relationships, and provides mayors with leadership and management tools of value to their cities. National League of Cities $15,229 $15,366 Network of elected and top appointed officials. North Texas Commission $41,693 $42,870 Promotes economic vitality and quality of life in the DFW Metropolitan area, DIFW Regional Film Commission $64,900 $44,900 Promotes the film industry within the DIFW metroplex. Several cities contribute to the commission because it promotes economic development. NON -DEPARTMENTAL CENTER DESCRIPTIONS J-69 CENTER DESCRIPTION 1999-00 2000-01 ADOPTED ADOPTED BUDGET BUDGET Public Technology, Inc. $13,500 $13,500 The nonprofit technology organization of the NLC, NAC, and ICMA. Provides information about technologies, management approaches, changes, and innovations in local government. Metropolitan Black Chamber of Commerce $2,500 $80,260 Works to create partnerships that bring people and resources together for the common good of individuals and businesses in the African -American community. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce $12,600 $95,210 Improves Hispanic business; represents Hispanic business interests; attracts and involves businesses and the Hispanic community. Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce $3,039 $3,039 Promotes the interests of its members by assuming a leadership role in making Fort Worth an excellent place in which to live and do business. USA News Network $3,300 $3,468 Informs City employees and guests to City Hall about local, state, and national news. It is a newsboard found in the cafeteria on the third floor of City Hall. Congressional Quarterly $12,510 $0 Service that assists the Grants Management staff in locating grants for departments throughout the City. City/FW Chamber/Tarrant County legislature Delegation $3,000 $3,000 Coordinator —Speaker Open Sponsorship Funds allocated for intergovernmental networking with state and federal legislative delegates. International City/County Management Association $0 $5,000 The International City/County Management Association aids cities and counties in obtaining accurate, fair and comparable data about quality and efficiency of service delivery to their citizens. The Texas Coalition of Cities on Franchise Utility Issues $14,850 $15,485 TCCFUI is a coalition of more than 100 Texas Cities dedicated to supporting the interests of the Citizens and Cities of Texas. TCCFUI monitors the activities of the Texas Legislature, provides franchising expertise and model franchise documents to member cities, and ensures that the citizens of Texas continue to enjoy quality utility service. Tarrant County Mental Health Council $0 $20,000 The Tarrant County Mental Health Council is developing and will implement a comprehensive mental health services plan for the City of Fort Worth and Tarrant County. NON -DEPARTMENTAL CENTER DESCRIPTIONS J-70 CENTER DESCRIPTION 1999.00 2000-01 ADOPTED ADOPTED BUDGET BUDGET 0904600 Tuition Reimbursement $163,000 $163,000 Funds allocated to provide financial assistance for college tuition through the City's Tuition reimbursement program. (100% for state schools and 75% for private institutions.) 0905500 CONSULTANT FEES Indirect Cost Study $40,000 $40,000 Payment for the preparation of the Indirect Cost Study. State Representation $71,000 $76,600 Allocation of funds for Austin consultation services. 1-35 Corridor Coalition (NASCO) $30,000 $15,000 Interlocal agreement between Denton County and the City of Fort Worth to unite concentrated efforts on the facets of improving the 1-35 thoroughfare in consideration of NAFTA. Federal Representation $193,596 $189,000 Allocation of funds for federal consultant services; consultation and representation related to issues of concern for the City of Fort Worth before the Congress of the United States and federal agencies. Citizen Survey $25,000 $26,000 Funds allocated for the annual citizen survey for the 1999-00 fiscal year. Bank Fees $25,000 $25,000 Payment for standard banking services. Neighborhood Arts Council $250,000 $280,000 Funding for the organization that funds local efforts to encourage communities to participate in the arts. It allows small art centers and theaters to operate in neighborhoods that have limited access to these activities. Law Enforcement. Block Grant Match $180,000 $180,000 Funds allocated to the program which, in conjunction with the Boys and Girls Club, aims at gang intervention. Fort Worth Trolley Linkage Project $100,000 $0 Funding allocated for the preliminary engineering and environmental assessment phase of the development of a trolley linkage system to connect Downtown, the Historic Stockyards, and the Cultural District. University of North Texas Health Science Center $250,000 $250,000 Funding allocated for joint project involving the City of Fort Worth and the University of North Texas Health Science Center to provide parking for students and patrons to the Will Rogers Memorial Center complex. Federal Resources Contract $0 $15,000 Funding allocated for a professional services contract with Virginia M. Mayer to aid Fort Worth in the proactive and strategic pursuit of federal grants. NON -DEPARTMENTAL CENTER DESCRIPTIONS J-71 CENTER DESCRIPTION 1999-00 2000-01 ADOPTED ADOPTED BUDGET BUDGET Information Technology Enhancements $0 $309,670 Funds allocated for the purchase of a new city wide budgeting system. Constituent Complaint Tracking System $0 $167,000 This program would track constituent phone calls, letters, faxes, e-mails, and/or other data communications regarding citizen opinions and/or requests, The system would then automatically refer the information to the correct department and/or individual for action. Equipment Services Division Study $0 $177,000 Funds allocated for a comprehensive study of the Equipment Services Division of the City Services Department. Historic Preservation Council $0 $68,817 Funds allocated for historic research projects of Samuels Avenue Neighborhood, Morningside Neighborhood, and ethnic research of the Northside Area. Sister Cities International $0 $60,000 Funds allocated for increase in expenses incurred in the marketing of Fort Worth in international markets. 0905503 Our City, Our Children $90,807 $185,100 Allocation of funds as part of a local effort, in conjunction with the Fort Worth Independent School District, to aid and encourage the youth in Fort Worth, 0905515 City of Fort Worth Timeline Project $0 $12,255 Funds allocated for this project entail a database and website link that provides an ongoing and updated historical resource that focuses on the history of Fort Worth, 0905600 Ambulance Contract $1,280,205 $1,311,021 Funds allocated as a subsidy payment from CFW to the Area Metropolitan Ambulance Authority (Medstar). Amount is based on $2.54 per capita for a population of 516,150. 0905700 Tarrant Appraisal District $1,253,364 $1,231,910 Allocation of funds budgeted as payment to TAD, 0905800 Public Improvement Districts $315,343 $329,175 Funds allocated as payment to Downtown Fort Worth, Inc. whereby they provide the following services for the public improvement districts: maintenance and landscaping, security enhancements, promotions and special events, marketing, transportation, and parking. 0906200 OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS Women's Haven $90,000 $90,000 Serves as a shelter for battered women. Open 24 hours a day, the shelter also provides emergency transportation, legal advice, and childcare. 111M NON -DEPARTMENTAL CENTER DESCRIPTIONS CENTER DESCRIPTION 1999-00 2000-01 ADOPTED ADOPTED BUDGET BUDGET Tarrant County Veterans Council $5,000 $5,000 Funds allocated For assistance with programs honoring the Veterans of Fort. Worth. 0906300 Information System and Services Network Projects $210,075 $0 Funds allocated to network General Fund departments and to support the Year 2000 Project. 0908000 Debt Service $45,989,907 $46,930,973 Funds budgeted as General Fund payment for debt service. 0909101 Elections $0 $275,000 Funds allocated for the City Council Elections. 0909103 SPECIAL TRANSFERS Engineering $60,000 $60,000 Funds Allocated for engineering services for the City. Solid Waste Sales Tax Transfer $194,953 $201,891 Funds allocated as a transfer to Solid Waste from General Fund. Solid Waste customers pay the funds to the State, and then the State returns the City's portion (1%). ADA Projects $100,000 $100,000 Funds allocated for the costs associated with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 0909500 EMPLOYEE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS PAY$ $22,074 $22,074 Program rewarding employees for cost saving suggestions with merit recognition. Service Awards $14,000 $14,000 Recognizes employees' longevity with the City. Clerical Conference $8,000 $8,000 Annual conference that honors support staff in the City. Commission on the Status of Women $10,000 $10,000 Advocate women in all phases of Fort Worth Society. Mayor's Committee on Persons with Disabilities $4,000 $4,000 Funds allocated for the Committee that is dedicated to working with persons who have disabilities. MLK/Juneteenth $1,000 $1,000 Funds to provide the annual Martin Luther King, Jr. and Juneteenth programs for City employees. Bus Pass $3,000 $3,000 Funds used as a subsidy for employees who ride the "T'.. 0909801 Terminal Leave $2,400,000 $2,485,368 Funds for terminal leave have been transferred from individual departments to the Non -Departmental budget. TOTAL! $68,933,587 $72,568,277 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Aviation General Debt Principal Series 1990 CO Alliance Control Tower $325,000 Total Aviation General Debt $325,000 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Aviation General Debt Principal Series 1990 CO Alliance Control Tower $325.000 Total Aviation General Debt $325,000 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Aviation General Debt Series 1990 CO Alliance Control Tower Total: Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2001-02 Aviation General Debt Series 1990 CO Alliance Control Tower Total: K-15 Interest Total $127.894 $452.894 $127,894 $462,894 Interest Total $105,550 $430.550 $105,650 $430,550 $2, 000, 000 $2,000,000 $1,675, 000 $1,676,000 K-16 Golf Service Debt Service Fund General Obligation Bonds Expenditures Principal - Long-term Debt Interest - Long-term Debt Fees - Long-term Debt Arbitrage Rebate Financing Transfer from Golf Fund Interest on Investments Projected Changes in Fund Balance Estimated Fund Balance 10/01 Plus: Transfer from Golf Fund Interest Earned on Investments Less: Budget Requirements FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 320,366 $ 345,434 241,870 222,616 Total $ 562,236 $ 568,050 $ 557,236 $ 563,050 5,000 5,000 Total $ 562,236 $ 568,050 FY1999-00 FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 157,150 $ 128,302 $ 128,302 $ 385,795 $ 557,236 $ 563,050 5,000 5,000 5,000 Long-term Debt Service Requirements $ 419,643 $ 562,236 $ 568,050 Fees/Arbitrage - - - Estimated Fund Balance 9/30 $ 128,302 $ 128,302 $ 128,302 Less Long-term Debt Reserve Requirement 9/30 $ 94,467 $ 88,059 $ 81,151 Estimated Available Fund Balance 9/30 $ 33,835 $ 40,242 $ 47,151 K-17 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Golf General Debt Principal Interest Total Series 1992a GO Refunding $11,362 $2,544 $13,906 Series 1993a GO Refunding $16,331 $20,083 $36,414 Series 1996a GO Refunding $87,673 $6,504 $94,177 Series 1999 CO Course Improvements $205,000 $212.739 $417,739 Total Golf General Debt $320,366 $241,870 $562,236 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Golf General Debt Principal Interest Total Series 1992a GO Refunding $4,710 $2,115 $6,826 Series 1993a GO Refunding $84,837 $17,714 $102,551 Series 1996a GO Refunding $50,887 $2,348 $53,235 Series 1999 CO Course Improvements $205,000 $200.439 $405,439 Total Golf General Debt $345,434 $222,616 $568,051 Remaining Principal - Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Golf General Debt Series1992aGO Refunding $50,977 Series1993aG0 Refunding $417,698 Series1996aGO Refunding $154,665 Series1999CO Courselmprovements $4,100.000 Total: $4,723,340 Remaining Principal - Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Golf General Debt Series 1992a GO Refunding $39,615 Series 1993a GO Refunding $401,367 Series 1996a GO Refunding $66,992 Series 1999 CO Course Improvements $3.895,000 Total: $4,402,974 K-18 Parking Building Debt Service Fund Expenditures Principal - Long-term Debt Interest - Long-term Debt Fees - Long-term Debt Arbitrage Rebate Financing Parking Building Debt Service Fund Reserve Southwestern Expo & Livestock Show Arena Rental Fees Interest Earner( on Investments Projected Changes in Fund Balance Estimated Fund Balance 10/01 Plus: Southwestern Expo & Livestock Show Arena Rental Fees Interest Earned on Investments Less: Long-term Debt Service Requirements Fees/Arbitrage Estimated Fund Balance 9/30 Less Long-term Debt Reserve Requirement 9/30 Estimated Available Fund Balance 9/30 Budget Requirements FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ - $ 124,355 262,645 Total $ - $ 387,000 $ - $ 167,000 80,000 80,000 120,000 120,000 20.000 20.000 Total $ 220,000 $ 387,000 FY1999-00 FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 903,510 $ 736,510 $ 956,516 80,000 120,000 20,000 $ 387,000 $ 80,000 120,000 20,000 80,000 120,000 20,000 $ 387,000 $ 736,510 $ 956,510 $ 789,510 $ 170,000 $ 170.000 $ 170,000 $ 566,510 $ 786,510 $ 619,510 K-19 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Parking Fund General Debt Principal Interest Total Series 1987 Will Will Rogers Parking Garage �—o Vo Rogers Rev Total Parking Fund General Debt $0 $0 $0 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Parking Fund General Debt Principal Interest Total Series 1987 Will Will Rogers Parking Garage $124,355 $262.645 $387.000 Rogers Rev Total Parking Fund General Debt $124,355 $262,645 $387,000 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2000.01 Parking Fund General Debt Series 1987 Will Will Rogers Parking Garage $314.565 Rogers Rev Total: $314,565 Remaining Principal — Outstanding issues FY2001-02 Parking Fund General Debt Series 1987 Will Will Rogers Parking Garage $314,565 Rogers Rev Total: $314,565 I:4K11 Water and Sewer Debt Service Fund Sewer General Obligation Bonds Expenditures Principal - Long-term Debt Interest - Long-term Debt Fees - Long-term Debt Arbitrage Rebate Financing Water and Sewer Operating Funds Projected Change in Fund Balance Estimated Fund Balance 10/01 Plus: Water and Sewer Operating Funds Interest Earned on Investments Transfer for Amortizations Less: Long-term Debt Service Requirements Amortizations for Refundings Fees - Long-term Debt Arbitrage Rebate Estimated Fund Balance 9130 Less Long-term Debt Reserve Requirement 9130 Estimated Available Fund Balance 9/30 Budget Requirements FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 1,679,125 $ 1,191,747 231,804 149,313 Total $ 1,910,929 $ 1,341,060 $ - $ 741.748 Total $ - $ 741,748 FY1999-00 FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 3,006,298 $ 3,186,298 $ 1,375,369 2,060,820 - 741,748 180,000 100,000 90,000 6,600 6,600 6,600 $ 2,060,820 $ 1,910,929 $ 1,341,060 6,600 6,600 6,600 $ 3,186, 298 $ 1,375,369 $ 866,057 $ 101,436 $ 67,854 $ 44,019 $ 3,084,862 $ 1,307,515 $ 822,038 K-21 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Water and Sewer General Debt Principal Interest Total Series1992a GO RefundingSewer $276,393 $61,877 $338,270 Series1993a GO RefundingSewer $56,992 $70,088 $127,080 Series1996a GO RefundingSewer $1,345,740 $99,839 $1.445,579 Total Water and Sewer General Debt $1,679,125 $231,804 $1,910,929 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Water and Sewer General Debt Principal Interest Total Series 1992a GO RefundingSewer $114,586 $51,459 $166,045 Series 1993a GO RefundingSewer $296,066 $61,820 $357,886 Series 1996a GO RefundingSewer $781,096 $36.034 $817,130 Total Water and Sewer General Debt $1,191,748 $149,313 $1,341,061 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Water and Sewer General Debt Series1992a GO RefundingSewer $1,240,076 Series1993a GO RefundingSewer $1,457,700 Series1996a GO RefundingSewer $2.374,037 Total: $5,071,813 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2001-02 Water and Sewer General Debt Series1992a GO RefundingSewer $963,683 Series1993a GO RefundingSewer $1,400,708 Series 1996a GO RefundingSewer $1,028.297 Total: $3,392,688 K-22 Water and Sewer Debt Service Fund Revenue Bonds Expenditures Principal - Long-term Debt Interest - Long-term Debt Fees/Arbitrage Financing Water and Sewer Operating Fund Interest Earned on Investments Other Projected Changes in Fund Balance Estimated Fund Balance 10/01 Plus: Water and Sewer Operating Fund Interest Earned on Investments Other Transfer for Amortizations Less: Long-term Debt Service Requirements Amortizations on Refundings Fees/Arbitrage Estimated Fund Balance 9/30 Total Budget Requirements FY2000-01-FY2001-02 $ 21,975,000 $ 25,355,000 18,597,059 18,175,772 17,000 17,000 $ 40,589,059 $ 43,547,772 $ 46,680,964 $ 45,912,691 200,000 200,000 150.000 100,000 Total $ 47,030,964 $ 46,212,691 FY1999-00 FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 1,069,946 $ 1,056,646 $ 7,185,251 38,065,341 46,680,964 45,912,691 500,000 200,000 200,000 300,000 150,000 100,000 313,300 313,300 313,300 $ 38,548,341 $ 40,572,059 $ 43,530,772 313,300 313,300 313,300 17,000 17,000 17,000 $ 1,056,646 $ 7,185,251 $ 9,536,870 Note on Reserves: In 1998, the Water and Sewer Fund purchased a Surety Bond, a form of insurance, to take the place of setting aside a portion of the fund balance for reserve requirements. K-23 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Water and Sewer Revenue Principal Series1991aRev Refunding (85.094% Water, 14.906% Sewer) $2,165,000 Series1991 b Rev Refunding (52.631 % Water ,47.369% Sewer) $9,730,000 Series1993 Rev Refunding (85,094% Water, 14.906% Sewer) $410,000 Series1996 Rev Refunding (56.0% Water, 44.0% Sewer) Series1997 Rev Water & Sewer Improvements Series1998 Rev Refunding SRLF89, CP, new projects Series2000 Rev Water & Sewer Series2000A Rev Water & Sewer Total Water and Sewer Revenue Interest Total $63,868 $2,228,868 $287,035 $10,017,035 $1,754,559 $2,164,559 $2,770,000 $2,997,375 $5,767,375 $2,225,000 $3,213,050 $5,438,050 $4,140,000 $4,493,005 $8,633,005 $535,000 $1,434,041 $1,969,041 $0 $4.354.127 $4.354.127 $21,975,000 $18,597,060 $40,572,060 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Water and Sewer Revenue Principal Interest Total Series1993 Rev Refunding (85.094% Water, 14,906% Sewer) $2,690,000 $1,688,114 $4,378,114 Series1996 Rev Refunding (56.0% Water, 44.0% Sewer) $2,900,000 $2,871,185 $5,771,185 Series1997 Rev Water & Sewer Improvements $2,325,000 $3,099,309 $5,424,309 Series1998 Rev Refunding SRLF89, CP, new projects $4,350,000 $4,280,755 $8,630,755 Series2000 Rev Water & Sewer $700,000 $1,290,231 $1,990,231 Series2000A Rev Water & Sewer $12.390.000 $4,946.178 $17.336.178 Total Water and Sewer Revenue $25,355,000 $18,175,772 $43,530,772 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Water and Sewer Revenue Series 1991a Rev Refunding (85.094% Water, 14.906% Sewer) $2,165,000 Series 1991 b Rev Refunding (52.631 % Water, 47.369% Sewer) $9,730,000 Series 1993 Rev Refunding (85.094% Water, 14.906% Sewer) $38,105,000 Series 1996 Rev Refunding (56.0% Water, 44.0% Sewer) $59,465,000 Series 1997 Rev Water & Sewer Improvements $61,730,000 Series 1998 Rev Refunding SRLF 89, CP, new projects $91,870,000 Series 2000 Rev Water & Sewer $25,000,000 Series 2000A Rev Water & Sewer $106.120,000 Total. $394,185,000 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2001-02 Water and Sewer Revenue Series1993 Rev Refunding (85.094% Water, 14.906% Sewer) $37,695,000 Series1996 Rev Refunding (56.0% Water, 44.0% Sewer) $56,695,000 Series1997 Rev Water & Sewer Improvements $59,505,000 Series1998 Rev Refunding SRLF89, CP, new projects $87,730,000 Series2000 Rev Water & Sewer $24,465,000 Series2000A Rev Water & Sewer $106,120.000 Total: $372,210,000 K-24 Water and Sewer Debt Service Fund State Revolving Loan Fund Expenditures Principal - Long-term Debt Interest - Long-term Debt Fees - Long-term Debt Arbitrage Rebate Financing Water and Sewer Operating Fund Use of Reserves Interest Projected Change in Fund Balance Estimated Fund Balance 10/01 Plus: Water and Sewer Operating Fund Interest Earned on Investments Less: Long-term Debt Service Requirements Fees/Arbitrage Estimated Fund Balance 9130 Budget Requirements FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 8,315,000 $ 8,665,000 8,700,005 8,398,805 50,000 50,000 Total $17,065,005 $17,113,805 $10,784,080 $17,832,420 6,080,925 200.000 200,000 Total $17,065,005 $18,032,420 FY1999-00 FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 8,548,301 $ 9,177,492 $ 3,096,567 9,561,828 $10,784,080 $17,832,420 5,160,977 200,000 200,000 14,043,614 $17,015,005 $17,063,805 50,000 50,000 50,000 $ 9,177,492 $ 3,096,567 $ 4,015,182 Note on Reserves: In 1998, the Water and Sewer Fund purchased a Surety Bond, a form of insurance, to take the place of setting aside a portion of the fund balance for reserve requirements. K-25 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Water and Sewer SRLF Principal Interest Total Series 1991 SRLF Sewer $700,000 $539,875 $1,239,875 Series 1992 SRLF Sewer $600,000 $356,850 $956,850 Series 1995 SRLF Sewer $715,000 $827,956 $1,542,956 Series 1996 SRLF Sewer $680,000 $653,640 $1,333,640 Series 1998 SRLF Sewer $2,225,000 $2,178,288 $4,403,288 Series 1999 SRLF Sewer $1,345,000 $1,481,251 $2,826,251 Series 1999A SRLF Sewer $2,050,000 $2.662.145 $4,712,145 Total Water and Sewer SRLF $8,315,000 $8,700,005 $17,015,005 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Water and Sewer SRLF Principal Interest Total Series 1991 SRLF Sewer $800,000 $509,850 $1,309,850 Series 1992 SRLF Sewer $600,000 $333,450 $933,450 Series 1995 SRLF Sewer $750,000 $793,708 $1,543,708 Series 1996 SRLF Sewer $705,000 $627,665 $1,332,665 Series 1998 SRLF Sewer $2,300,000 $2,104,738 $4,404,738 Series 1999 SRLF Sewer $1,390,000 $1,437,133 $2,827,133 Series 1999A SRLF Sewer $2,120,000 $2,592,263 $4.712,263 Total Water and Sewer SRLF $8,665,000 $8,398,807 $17,063,807 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Water and Sewer SRLF Series 1991 SRLF Sewer $12,200,000 Series 1992 SRLF Sewer $8,400,000 Series 1995 SRLF Sewer $16,360,000 Series 1996 SRLF Sewer $14,965,000 Series 1998 SRLF Sewer $56,745,000 Series 1999 SRLF Sewer $36,805,000 Series 1999A SRLF Sewer $61,750,000 Total: $207,225,000 K-26 Remaining Principal -- Outstanding Issues FY2001-02 Water and Sewer SRLF Series 1991 SRLF Sewer $11,500,000 Series 1992 SRLF Sewer $7,800,000 Series 1995 SRLF Sewer $15,645,000 Series 1996 SRLF Sewer $14,285,000 Series 1998 SRLF Sewer $54,520,000 Series 1999 SRLF Sewer $35,460,000 Series 1999A SRLF Sewer $59,700,000 Total: $198,910,000 c Culture and Tourism Debt Service Fund Expenditures Principal - Long-term Debt Interest - Long-term Debt Fees - Long-term Debt Arbitrage Rebate Financing Hotel Occupancy Tax (2%) Auto Rental Facility Revenue Projected Changes in Fund Balance Estimated Fund Balance 10/01 Plus: Hotel Occupancy Tax (2%) Auto Rental Facility Revenue Less: Long-term Debt Service Requirements Fees/Arbitrage Estimated Fund Balance 9130 Less Long-term Debt Reserve Requirement 9/30 Estimated Available Fund Balance 9/30 Budget Requirements FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 1,185,000 $ 1,240,000 $ 2,478,725 $ 2,415,069 Total $ 3,663,725 $ 3,655,069 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3.200,000 $ 3.200.000 Total $ 5,200,000 $ 5,200,000 FY1999-00 FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 2,262,733 $ 2,896,269 $ 4,432,544 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 3,200,000 3,200,000 $ 1,366,464 $ 3,663,725 $ 3,655,069 $ 2,896,269 $ 4,432,544 $ 5,977,475 $ 888.000 $ 864,300 $ 839.500 $ 2,008,269 $ 3,568,244 $ 5,137,975 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Culture and Tourism Revenue Principal Interest Series 2000 CO Convention Center $1,185,000 $2,478,725 Total Culture and Tourism Revenue Debt $1,185,000 $2,478,725 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Culture and Tourism Revenue Principal Interest Series 2000 CO Convention Center $1,240.000 $2,415.069 Total Culture and Tourism Revenue Debt $1,240,000 $2,415,069 Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Culture and Tourism Revenue Series 2000 CO Convention Center Remaining Principal — Outstanding Issues FY2001-02 Culture and Tourism Revenue Series 2000 CO Convention Center Total: Total: Total $3.663.725 $3,663,725 Total 3 655 069 $3,655,069 $44,400.000 $44,400,000 $43.215, 000 $43,215,000 K-29 K-30 Solid Waste Debt Service Fund Expenditures Principal - Long-term Debt Interest - Long-term Debt Fees - Long-term Debt Arbitrage Rebate Financing Transfer from Solid Waste Fund Projected Changes in Fund Balance Estimated Fund Balance 10101 Plus: Transfer from Solid Waste Fund Less: Long-term Debt Service Requirements Fees/Arbitrage Estimated Fund Balance 9130 Less Long-term Debt Reserve Requirement 9130 Estimated Available Fund Balance 9/30 Budget Requirements FY2000-01 FY2001-02 $ 99,198 $ 99,198 $ 38,236 $ 32,353 Total $ 137,434 $ 131,551 $ 137.434 $ 131,551 Total $ 137,434 $ 131,551 FY1999-00 FY2000-01 FY2001-02 137,434 131,551 $ - $ 137,434 $ 131,551 $ 13,888 $ 11,904 $ 9,920 $ (13,888) $ (11,904) $ (9,920) K-31 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2000-01 Solid Waste Revenue Principal Interest Total Solid Waste Trucks $99,198 $38,236 $137,433 Equipment Note 2000 Total Solid Waste Revenue Debt $99,198 $38,236 $137,433 Annual Principal and Interest Requirements by Series FY2001-02 Solid Waste Revenue Principal Interest Total Solid Waste Trucks $99,198 $32,353 $131,551 Equipment Note 2000 Total Solid Waste Revenue Debt $99,198 $32,353 $131,551 Remaining Principal -- Outstanding Issues FY2000-01 Solid Waste Revenue Solid Waste Trucks $694,383 Equipment Note 2000 Total: $694,383 Remaining Principal ® Outstanding Issues FY2001-02 Solid Waste Revenue Solid Waste Trucks $595,186 Equipment Note 2000 Total: $595,186 d �IM �h ....... H,, ; CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 In order to design, acquire, and construct various capital improvements, the City of Fort Worth utilizes proceeds from general obligation bonds, certificates of obligation, revenue bonds, commercial paper, the State Revolving Loan Fund, Federal and State grants, the Capital Projects Reserve Fund, and private contributions/assessments. These improvements may include any new project, expansion, upgrade, or other addition designed to improve or conserve the value of City assets or enhance service capacity. Capital improvements are expected to have an ordinary useful life of at least 15-20 years, which is the approximate time required to repay the principal and interest due on the bonds issued to fund the construction or acquisition of a specific improvement. The City has literally hundreds of capital projects in various stages which include: design, right-of- way acquisition, utility relocation, and construction. The construction/acquisition contracts for the projects listed on the following pages are scheduled for award in Fiscal Year 2000-01. COST OF ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATING IMPACTS General Fund: The General Fund is the largest fund in the City of Fort Worth and accounts for all financial resources of the City, with the exception of those accounted for in another fund. Several positions in the General Fund are directly involved with capital projects, and many of these positions are funded by the Capital Projects Fund through reimbursement. However, some positions devote only a partial amount of time to capital projects, and as a result, these costs are absorbed by the General Fund. Approximately 31 positions in the Transportation and Public Works Department are directly engaged in design, inspection, L-1 L-2 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAID FY2000-01 and contract administration related to street and drainage projects, building projects, and other general government capital projects. The total cost of administering construction of these projects is estimated to be $1.2 million, of which 84%, or $1,066,078, is charged to capital project funds. The remainder of the cost is absorbed by the General Fund budget. The Parks and Community Services Department has seven positions involved in the administration of park's capital projects. The total cost of administering construction of these projects is estimated to be $298,102, of which $111,962, or 38 %, is charged to capital project funds. The remainder of the cost is absorbed by the General Fund budget. There are several positions involved in the administration of capital projects in the Public Events Department. The total cost of administering construction of these projects is estimated to be $17,414, which is absorbed by the General Fund budget. Airports Fund: The Airports Fund is an enterprise fund, whereby revenues are collected to recover operating and debt service costs incurred in the provision of services. In this fund, four positions are directly involved with airport capital projects, and the total cost of administering construction of these projects is estimated to be $99,552, which, is absorbed by the Airports Fund. In addition, no new positions were budgeted in this fiend as a result of capital projects. Aviation capital projects impact the operating funds for both the Airports Fund and the General Fund. Debt service costs must be paid annually on bonds issued to finance the capital projects, and these costs are absorbed by the Airports Operational Fund. Finally, CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 as a general rule, capital projects for aviation services would not impact the General Fund of the City, as all costs for administrative functions provided by General Fund employees usually would be reimbursed from the Airports Fund. However, it is anticipated that this fund will experience a negative fund balance in FY2000-01; therefore, it is not anticipated that these costs to the General Fund will be reimbursed until such time as the Airports Fund attains a positive financial status. Water and Sewer Fund: The Water and Wastewater departments of the City of Fort Worth form a utility operating as an Enterprise Fund within the organization, whereby revenues are collected to defray operating costs and debt service. In the Water and Wastewater departments, several positions are directly involved with capital projects. Many of these positions are funded by the Water and Sewer Capital Projects Fund through reimbursement; however, some positions devote only a partial amount of time to capital projects. As a result, these costs are absorbed by the Water and Sewer Operating Fund. Approximately 30 positions in the Water and Wastewater departments are directly engaged in design, inspection, and contract administration of water and wastewater projects. The total cost of administering construction of these projects is estimated to be $1.19 million, of which 44% is charged to the Capital Projects Fund; the remainder of these costs is absorbed by the Water and Sewer Operational Fund. No new positions were budgeted in this fund as a result of capital projects. L-3 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN L-4 FY2000-01 At the same time, the debt service costs associated with the financing of water and wastewater capital projects are absorbed by the Water and Sewer Operational Fund. These costs are comprised of two components: a) debt that must be paid annually on bonds issued to finance the projects, and b) debt on the cash financing used to fund rehabilitation projects on existing infrastructure. Engineering Fund: The Engineering Department of the City of Fort Worth manages the Engineering Fund and provides comprehensive engineering services to City departments for all infrastructure/capital projects. These services include: design, mapping, project management, surveying, quality control testing, and construction management and inspection. Due to the significant number of capital projects planned for FY2000-01, it is anticipated that Engineering staff will provide services to several departments, including: Transportation and Public Works, Aviation, Parks and Community Services, Water and Wastewater, and Public Events. The Engineering Department has 157 positions authorized in the FY2000-01, which will be devoted to various projects across the customer departments, and no new positions were budgeted as a result of capital projects. The Engineering Department is an internal service fund that derives revenue from customer departments to offset the actual costs of services rendered. As a result, the impact from Engineering Services on the General Fund or any of the other City funds is the amount for charges that must be reimbursed for services provided. Charges are CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 assessed by project to the customer departments based on actual salary costs times a multiplier of 1.8%, that includes all Engineering administrative and operating costs. Upon completion, many capital projects will impact the operating budget. In some cases, there will be an increase in operating expenditures to fund personnel, supplies, and utilities associated with the completion of a facility such as a library or fire station, or with the purchase or installation of major equipment, For example, $725,108 was added to the FY2000-01 Library Department budget in anticipation of the completion and grand opening of a new neighborhood branch library this November. These costs have been delineated in the Annual Operating Impact column, where applicable. At the same time, upon completion, many projects will not impact the operating budget, as they are not additional or new improvements but represent an upgrade, renovation, or reconstruction of an existing project or facility. For example, there was no impact on the FY2000-01 operating budget by the completion last fiscal year of Phase II Renovations at the Will Rogers Memorial Complex. These improvements entailed major redevelopment of the West parking lot, a new irrigation system, and new, more suitable plant materials. When these improvements were initiated, the parking facility was already in use and the nature of the improvements merely consisted of upgrades and repair to areas of physical aging and deterioration. Further, the reconstruction of streets with bond monies will not impact the operating budget, as no maintenance will be necessary due to a warranty period. Conversely, it is not anticipated that any savings will result in the street maintenance budget of the General Fund, due to the magnitude of streets in need of repair. Any savings realized from reconstructing streets with bond funds will be L-5 X-1 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAIN FY2000-01 redirected and fully utilized on maintenance efforts for the inventory of streets in ill repair that were not included in the bond program. 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND PROGRAM In February of 1998, the citizens of Fort Worth voted to approve a $120 million bond program as proposed in a bond referendum election. All five propositions in the proposed package passed successfully with an average of 88 percent majority. Voters authorized bonds for improvements in five program areas by specific propositions, as follows: Streets and Storm Sewer Improvements ........................... $80,000,000 Convention Center and Public Events Facilities .................. 20,700,000 Parks and Community Services Projects ............................ 11,800,000 Fire Services Projects ................................................. 4,800,000 Library Services Projects ............................................. 2,700,000 Total Bond Program: $120,000,000 An aggressive four-year implementation schedule was developed for initiation or completion of each of the projects approved, and many projects have already been completed. Accordingly, it is anticipated that construction will continue this fiscal year on many of these projects, and these projects are reflected along with other capital projects in the following pages under the various program areas of the Capital Projects Plan. CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Primarily funded from the proceeds of Street Improvement bonds (indicated below as "CIP") approved in 1986, 1990, 1993, and 1998, these projects include improvements to traffic flow throughout the City, improvements and/or construction of sidewalks, drainage systems, traffic signals, street lights, neighborhood streets, and construction and restructuring of streets, thoroughfares, collectors, and storm drains. Neighborhood Streets Rehabilitation Program Improvements will be made to the following neighborhood streets by reconstructing and, in some cases, extending the streets. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT: Limits: Amount: Source: Date: Impact: 26TH Loving to Azle $245,700 98 CIP 25-Sep-01 NA 26TH Refugio to Market $140,400 98 CIP 25-Sep-01 NA 29TH Titus to Sheerman $81,900 98 CIP 8-May-01 NA 29TH Rock Island to Kearny $409,500 98 CIP 8-May-01 NA 30TH Lydon to Sheerman $585,000 98 CIP 8-May-01 NA l` ADAMS Jessamine to Elizabeth $118,170 98 CIP 13-Dec-00 NA ASHLAND Donnelly to Alamo $146,250 98 CIP 3-Apr-01 NA ASHLAND Donnelly to I-30 Ser Rd $210,600 98 CIP 3-Apr-01 NA AVE G Miller to Hughes $157,950 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA AVE H Miller to Hughes $140,400 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA AVE N Campbell to Wallace $146,250 98 CIP 28-Mar-01 NA AVE N Miller to Hughes $193,050 98 CIP 28-Mar-01 NA AVE N Wallace to 4104 Ave N $193,050 98 CIP 28-Mar-01 NA BELLE Lafayette to Dexter $51,480 98 CIP 19-Jun-01 NA CAMILLA Conner to S Beach $175,500 98 CIP 14-Aug-01 NA CANTY 5th to College $201,240 98 CIP 13-Dec-00 NA CHESTNUT NW 25th to NW 27th St $222,300 98 CIP 25-Sep-01 NA COTTEY Farrell to Stalcup $175,500 98 CIP 5-Mar-01 NA DAISY Sylvania to Blandin $128,700 98 CIP 6-May-01 NA DAISY Sylvania to Dead End $320,580 98 CIP 6-May-01 NA DILLOW Ramey to Ave N $105,300 98 CIP 28-Mar-01 NA FARRELL Coty to Norris $117,000 98 CIP 5-Mar-01 NA FARRELL Ramey to Truman $181,350 98 CIP 5-Mar-01 NA FOARD Martin to Hardeman $678,600 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA FOGG W of Berke to E Dead End $351,000 98 CIP 28-Aug-01 NA FORTUNE Pelham to Clayton $421,200 98 CIP 18-Sep-01 NA GLEN GARDEN Old Mansfield to Stephen Lee $152,100 98 CIP 28-Aug-01 NA HARDEMAN Foard to Wichita $128,700 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA HOWARD Miller to Shakleford $351,000 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA HOWARD Tallman to Wichita $234,000 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA JAMES Edgecliff to Old Crowley Rd $128,700 98 CIP 30-Jan-01 NA L-7 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 Neighborhood Streets Rehabilitation Program (cont.) Estimated Proj. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT: Limits: Amount: Source: Date: Impact: -. JEROME Park Place to W Rosedale $292,500 98 CIP 19-Jun-01 NA JONES Morningside to Lowden $140,400 98 CIP 7-Aug-01 NA KINGS DALE Rollings Hills to Ellis Ave $362,700 98 CIP 28-Aug-01 NA KNOX ST Wichita to Erath $351,000 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA KNOX ST Miller to Shakleford $339,300 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA KOCH Conner to Beach $58,500 98 CIP 14-Aug-01 NA LIPSCOMB Magnolia to Feliks Grozdz $182,520 98 CIP 13-Dec-00 NA LIPSCOMB Hawthorne to Jessamine $187,200 98 CIP 13-Dec-00 NA LOUIS Craig to Routt $84,240 98 CIP 5-Mar-01 NA LOWDEN Adams to Hemphill $418,860 98 CIP 13-Dec-00 NA MEADERS Craig to 2404 Meaders $231,660 98 CIP 24-Oct-00 NA MODLIN Belle to Dead End $210,600 98 CIP 19-Jul-01 NA N HUGHES AVE E Lancaster to Norma $128,700 98 CIP 24-Oct-00 NA NOLAN Vaughn to Martin $596,700 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA OLD CROWLEY RD Edgecliff to James $105,300 98 CIP 30-Jan-01 NA PARKDALE Koch to Dead End $105,300 98 CIP 14-Aug-01 NA PEARL Long to Gould $187,200 98 CIP 8-May-01 NA PELAM Clayton to Camp Bowie $210,600 98 CIP 26-Jun-01 NA ROCKWOOD Churchill to E Dead End $234,000 98 CIP 10-Jul-01 NA SANBORN Scott to E Lancaster $620,100 98 CIP 14-Aug-01 NA SARGENT E Lancaster to Meadowbrook $526,500 98 CIP 14-Aug-01 NA SCHAKLEFORD Vaughn to Wilbarger $409,500 98 CIP 12-Jun-01 NA SIMONDALE Bellaire to Biddison $152,100 98 CIP 18-Sep-01 NA STUART Morningside to E Ramsey $210,600 98 CIP 7-Aug-01 NA THOMAS El Campo to Dead End $180,180 98 CIP 15-Jul-01 NA TIMBERLINE S Riverside to S Dead End $128,700 98 CIP 28-Aug-01 NA VALENTINE 1-30 Ser Rd to Ashland $585,000 98 CIP 3-Apr-01 NA W FOGG 6th Ave to Hemphill $409,500 98 CIP 2-Jan-01 NA W GAMBRELL Mc Cart to Frazier $78,390 98 CIP 2-Jan-01 NA TOTAL: $14,620,320 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (cant,) Estimated Proj. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT: Amount: Source: Date: Impact: Streets and Storm Drainage Projects (Excluding Neighborhood Street Projects) 21st Street Bridge at Marine Creels $300,000 98'CIP 2001 NA Bailey's Industrial Drainage 870,000 98 CIP 2001 NA Dry Branch Creek Drainage Improvements - Phase 1 300,000 98 CIP 2000 NA Dry Branch Creek Drainage Improvements - Phase 11 1,500,000 98 CIP 2001 NA East Como Drainage System 25,000 93 CIP 2000 NA Hazelwood Drainage 300,000 98 CIP 2001 NA Highland Hills Drainage System 919,000 93 CIP 2000 NA Highland Hills Drainage, Phase 2 1,200,000 98 CIP 2000 NA 120/SH183/Bellaire Dr - Drainage Improvements 577,899 98 CIP 2000 NA Meadowbrook Dr -(from Sandy Ln to Handley Dr) 1.484,000 98 CIP 2000 NA Sylvania Ave - (W. 1/2 to 28th Premier) 416,000 98 CIP 2001 NA Will Rogers (Alta Mesa to Joel East) 1,336,000 98 CIP 2000 NA TOTAL: $9,227,899 Other Street Related Projects STREET LIGHTS - Various Projects as identified $300,576 98 CIP Various 33,000 TRAFFIC SIGNALS - Various Projects as identified 1,862,000 98 CIP Various 53,000 SIDEWALK PROGRAM - Various Projects as identified 600,000 98 CIP Various 269,000 TOTAL: $2,762,576 Regional Thoroughfare and Arterial Projects Generally, these projects are jointly funded by state and federal sources with some City participation. TRINITY BLVD -(from Greenbelt Rd to FM 157) Contract for $3,902.267 98 CIP Nov-00 NA reconstruction awarded by TxDOT. N. UNIVERSITY BRIDGE @ W. Trinity River (North bound) 128,300 98 CIP Sep-01 NA HENDERSON UNDERPASS - Union Pacific Railroad: TxDot will 1,043,446 98 CIP Apr-01 NA include as change order to IH-30 relocation project. CAMP BOWIE17th STREET/UNIVERSITY DRIVE 250,000 98 CIP Nov-00 NA INTERSECTION; Contract awarded by TXDOT HEMP H ILL/LAMAR/TAYLOR/J ENNI N GS/LANCASTER/MAI N 1,200,000 98 CIP Apr-01 NA ST, (Plan/Design) L-9 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN L-10 FY2000-01 STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (cont.) Regional Thoroughfare and Arterial Projects (cont.) Estimated Proj. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT Amount: Source Date: Impact: 6�`S'.£F"'9,�a"...:. ... '.JiF'y'si. "ib'e^ �::.: _n..3."�Y;R._.=... \"sew :4�?i..c•. -3So- .: _,fl:�i -A. B: `:,.r^ S'nd�4s:.::">.,,':xi�u.,C,.;9�:=..r.-m,:?i'«i,2k'.&3i, -. _'.__k5's?5.;� h'.`: M::F'.t"hl„"eEL_ e _.��.',1'{`',�:it�.`4,.-�,j MEACHAM BLVD-(Gold Spike Dr to N Main St) $1,600,000 98 CIP Jan-01 NA BERRY STREETSCAPE 1,560,000 98 CIP Sep-01 NA NORTH MAIN LINKAGE 1,500,000 98 CIP Sep-01 NA SOUTHWEST PARKWAY 500,000 98 CIP May-01 NA WEST ROSEDALE-(from Forest Park Blvd to Main St) 10,500,000 93 CIP Aug-01 NA NORTH BEACH STREET WIDENING -(from Basswood Blvd. To Shiver Rd) 2,507,621 Various Jan-01 NA I-30 BILLBOARD REMOVAL 1,378,350 Various Jan-01 NA TOTAL: $26,069,984 MAJOR PROJECTS AND FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS These projects include new construction, improvements, renovations, and expansion of major City facilities and other improvement projects in various areas. They are funded by various improvement bonds . Estimated Proj. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT Amount:. Source: Date: Impact: lm SUMMERGLEN LIBRARY -Construction of new branch library to be completed in October with Grand Opening on November 11, 2000. FIRE STATION #$(West Rosedale): Relocation and Construction of this station necessary due to widening of Rosedale St.;Compietion of land purchase, station design plans, and award of contract; Initiate construction of project. FIRE STATION #39 (Bryant Irvin & Oakmont): Completion of station design plans and award of contract; Initiate construction of project. EUGENE McCRAY COMMUNITY CENTER:Design for new community facility has been completed. Award of contract anticipated in Dec 200;Anticipate initiation of construction in Jan 2001, FORT WORTH CONVENTION CENTER: Phase I -General Construction for renovation and expansion of the existing facility to broaden convention services. Anticipated that construction contract will be awarded in Nov 2000. TOTAL: $1,400,000 98 CIP underway 725,108 2.300,000 Various Fall 2001 NIA 2,000,000 98 CIP Fall 2001 NIA 1,594,476 98 GIP Dec-00 $146,435 22,000,000 Various Phase 1: (shell Nov -00 NA construction) $29,294,476 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS L-11 These projects include renovating, upgrading, and enlarging existing park and community service facilities, as well as the construction of new facilities, in selected areas of the City. They are funded primarily from the proceeds of Parks and Community Services Improvement bonds (CIP) and other sources to include: GEF- Golf Enterprise Fund MAYFEST - Mayfest revenues CPRF- Capital Projects Reserve Fund GFFB- General Fund Fund Balance LW Trust - Lake Worth Trust Fund GRANT - Funds from Texas Parks and Wildlife, federal government, or private sources, Estimated Proj. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT: Amount: Source: Date: Impact: Animal Nutrition Complex -New Facility at Zoo $1,000,000 98 CIP 1-Mar-00 NIA Botanic Garden Parking Lot Lighting- Additional security lights 150,000 98 CIP 1-Jan-00 15,000 Bradley Community Center Renovation- Addition of rest rooms 50,000 98 CIP 1-Dec-00 5,000 Casino Beach - Boat Ramp Development 266,000 Grant 1-Dec-00 2,600 Riverside Community Center- Expansion 313,270 CDBG 31,327 North Tri-Ethnic Community Center- Remodel 217,000 CDBG 1-Dec-00 21,700 Sandy Ln Park -Erosion Control Ballfield Reconfig. 331,000 98CIP/CPRF 1-Dec-00 NIA Gateway Park- Soccer Improvements 711,500 GF/Grantl CDBG 1-Apr-00 100,000 Far North Fort Worth Community Park - Phase One Develop 609,190 98 CIP 1-Dec-00 60,000 Harmon Field Sports Complex - Soccer Field Develop;parking lot 550,000 93&98 CIP I -Jan-00 75,000 McCray Community Center -New Center 1,595,724 98 CIP/CDBG 1-Aug-00 150,000 Park Roads/Parking-Reconstuct/resurf roads & park lots at:Marion Sansom and S.Z. Boaz 227,000 93 CIP 1-Jan-00 15,000 Pecan Valley River Course Renovation - Renovation of 18 holes 2,100,000 GEF 1-Sep-99 NIA Rolling Hills Soccer Complex - Soccer field development 1,299,000 98CIP/GF/CDBG 1-Jan-00 275,000 Security Lighting -improved lighting in parking lots 123,000 98 CIP 1-May-00 12,300 Southwest Athletic Complex- Addition of new park 750,000 86 CIP 1-Sep-01 75,000 Sycamore Park Youth Athletic- Expansion/renovation of fields 1,193,000 98CIP/Granfi/CDBG 1-Dec-99 119,300 Trinity Trail Extension- 12.9 Miles 3,494,000 Grant 1-Feb-00 70,000 West Community Park- Phase One Development 700,000 86 & 98 C1P 1-Jun-00 100,000 Rockwood Park -Athletic Field Lighting I Parking 597,020 98 CIP 1-Feb-00 59,702 Lake Como - Erosion control 100,000 98 CIP 1-Sep-01 10,000 Nature Center - Boundary Fence 125,000 98 CIP 1-Sep-01 11,250 Log Cabin Village - Parking Lot 55,000 98 CIP 1-Sep-01 N/A Water Gardens - Electrical and plumbing renovation 500,000 98 CIP 1-Sep-01 NIA Nature Center- Bridge Replacement 100,000 98 CIP 1-Sep-01 10,000 Marine Park- Playground Expansion 75,000 CDBG 1-Sep-01 750 Hallmark Park- Athletic Field Lighting 126,990 98 CIP 1-Sep-01 N/A TOTAL: $17,368,694 L-12 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS Water Projects These projects include the construction, expansion, and upgrading of water treatment facilities, transmission lines, pump stations, and storage facilities. They are funded generally from the proceeds of several sources to include: OB - Operating Budget (cash financing), and CP- Commercial Paper (eventually converted to Water and Sewer revenue bonds) Estimated Proj. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT: Amount. Source: Date: Impact: txk'. �?kn�,. "rati�rdr#pf.... aw.:mv�acixta^Stiv*wt, . 'k��wm' %�i."in' �il±M.s' �vak; Miscellaneous Water Extension, Replace, Relocate, Various '. •. :t:.a.U�n' " M''o-i2 'OF.x'e.,vtcan,e.aM:ttiwt. Locations $1,000,000 CP 01-Oct-00 NA Miscellaneous Development Extensions (CFA) 1,000,000 CP 01-Oct-00 NA Contingency for Unidentified Projects 1,250,000 CP 01-Oct-00 NA Street Projects 6,400,000 OB 01-Oct-00 NA Maintenance Related Projects 3,500,000 OB 01-Oct-00 NA Timberline Tank Repainting and Rehab. (ENG & CM) 138,000 CP 01-Oct-00 NA Stagecoach Tank Repainting and Rehabilitation 1,050,000 CP 01-Oct-00 NA Stagecoach PS Improvements 1,000,000 CP 01-Nov-00 NA 36-Inch Water Main in Rissing Rd from Crowley Rd to McCart Ave. 1,106,000 CP 01-Dec-00 NA 2 MG Ground Storage Tank at McCart Ave 700,000 CP 01-Dec-00 NA NHWTP Filters, Electrical Improv & Backwash Modifications, Phase I (CM) 768,750 CP 01-Jan-01 NA NHWTP Filters, Elect. Improv & Backwash Modific., Phase 1 18,484,000 CP 01-Jan-01 NA Rolling Hills WTP Ozonation & Elect. Improve., Phase I (CM) 1,590,000 CP 01-Jul-01 NA Rolling Hills WTP Ozonation & Elect. Improve., Phase 1 20,000,000 CP 01-Jul-01 NA Cantrell Sansom P. S. Improv & ES II/NS 11 Transmission Line, Phase I (CM) 300,000 CP 01-Apr-01 NA Cantrell Sansom P.S. Improv & ES II/NS 11 Transmission Line, Phase I 10,000,000 CP 01-Apr-01 NA Heron Road Water Line 884,000 CP 01-Jan-01 NA South Side II Transmission Line - 36-Inch, Contract 3 5,000,000 CP 01-Feb-01 NA Electrical Improv & Pumps at Booster PS, Phase 1 800,000 CP 01-Feb-01 NA South Holly Transfer Pump Station Improvements 1,500,000 CP 01-Jan-01 NA 48-Inch Water Line Along US 377 and Aledo Rd from Exiting 24- Inch (Eng) 420,000 CP 01-Jun-01 NA 36-Inch Water Main in Rissinger Rd from Oak Grove Rd to Crowley Rd (Eng) 150,000 CP 01-Jun-01 NA 3 MG Ground Storage Tank in Westside It (Eng) 65,400 CP 01-Jun-01 NA New McCart Ave 15 MG Pump Station and Piping 1,630,000 CP 01-Sep-01 NA TOTAL: $78,736,150 CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN FY2000-01 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS (Cont.) Wastewater Projects These projects include the construction, expansion, and upgrading of wastewater treatment facilities, collection mains, and lift stations. They are funded generally from the proceeds of several sources to include: OB - Operating Budget (cash financing) CP - Commercial Paper (eventually converted to Water and Sewer revenue bonds) SRLF - Texas Water Development Board State Revolving Loan Fund Program Estimated Proj. Annual Contract Funding Award Oper. PROJECT: Amount: Source. Date: Impact: Miscellaneous Water Extension, Replace, Relocate, Various Locations $1,000,000 CP 1-Oct-00 NA Miscellaneous Development Extensions (CFA) 1,000,000 CP 1-Oct-00 NA Contingency for unidentified Projects 1,250,000 CP 1-Oct-00 NA Street Projects 1,400,000 OB 1-Oct-00 NA Maintenance Related Projects 3,500,000 OB 1-Oct-00 NA III Abatement Program 4,800,000 SRLF 1-Oct-00 NA Southshore Interceptor, Lift Station & Force Main (Eng) 1,008,000 CP 1-Nov-00 NA VCWWTP Uprating Improvement, Phase 1 (166 MGD @ 2 Hr. Peak 369 MGD) (CM) 535,000 SRLF 1-Dec-00 NA VCWWTP Uprating Improvement, Phase 1 (166 MGD @ 2 Hr. Peak 369 MGD) 7,135,000 SRLF 1-Dec-00 NA Sanitary Sewer Main 1-i-1 1,250.000 CP 1-Mar-01 NA Clear Fork Relief Sanitary Sewer 6,500,000 CP 1-Jul-01 NA Trinity River Syphon (Eng) 70,000 - CP 1-Feb-01 NA Fossil Creek Peak Flow & Force Main (Eng) 896,000 CP 1-Feb-01 NA Village Creek Ballasted Flocculation 26,000,000 SRLF 1-Oct-01 NA Village Creek Ballasted Flocculation (CM) 1,304,000 SRLF 1-Oct-01 NA TOTAL: $57,648,000 AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS These projects include improvements and expansion of general aviation facilities at Meacham, Spinks and Alliance Airports. Projects are generally funded from the proceeds of airport improvement bonds, general obligation bonds, and other sources to include: ACIP -Aviation Capital Improvement Project Fund FAAIAIP -Federal Aviation Administration -Airport Improvement Project Grant TXDOTIACIP -Texas Department of Transportation "Pass -Through" FAA AIP Grant Meacham Phase III Taxiway Alpha Realignment Intersection of Taxiways Delta and Kilo Rehab Spinks Rehabilitation Runway 17RI35L Rehab TOTAL: $5,900,000 FAAICPRF 1-Jan-00 NIA 250,314 FAA 1-Nov-99 NIA Entitlement Funds 880,000 TXDOTIACIP 1-Aug-00 NIA $7,030,314 L-13 1111i<I93 FUND STATEMENT WATER AND SEWER The Water and Sewer Fund is an Enterprise Fund of the City of Fort Worth that has responsibility for providing water and wastewater services to residential, commercial, industrial, and wholesale customers. It serves approximately 750,000 people in Fort Worth and 26 surrounding communities by providing more than 220 million gallons of water for use every day. The Water and Sewer Fund is comprised of two separate departments: Water and Wastewater, The departments are separate because water and wastewater services are billed as independent fees to recoup the cost of delivery. However, they share an administration and many of the employees are partially expensed to both departments. Operations are completely financed through fees for service. In addition, debt is issued for larger capital projects. Costs continue to rise as the City makes necessary renovations to an aging infrastructure and continues to respond to Environmental Protection Agency mandates. Significant increases are necessary in debt service for financing capital projects, raw water purchases, and contractual services. As a result, the adopted expenditure budget reflects a $15.9 million increase above the FY1999-00 level. The budget increase dictates a 10.1 percent increase in the revenue requirements for water and a 6.8 percent increase in the revenue requirements for wastewater. The City will continue to make necessary renovations to its infrastructure and has undertaken the largest Capital Improvements Project (CIP) in City history, at a projected cost of approximately $230 million. Of this amount, $166 million is specifically to address the EPA Administrative Order (AO), which mandated that the City correct wastewater system deficiencies. Funding sources for AO projects include current revenues, short-term debt of commercial paper, and long-term debt consisting of revenue bonds and state revolving loan funds. M-1 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET M=3 r WATER AND SEWER FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 20.0�-01 REVENUES:.. U#ilityilncame $187,114,975 Connections and Extensions 1,080817 Revenues from the ,Use of Money and Property 2,656620 InterdepartmentaE Charges 370000 Other Revenue 5,762,511 Use of Retained Earnings 5,677;638 TOTAL REVENUES $202,6fi2;561 .... F XPENpITUR S: Persona! Services $33,871,660 Supplies 9,109,077 Contractuai Services 98,593. 1 60 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENSES $141,573,897 . . Capital Outlay $3,367,620 Deb# .S.ervice 67,721.U44 . ..:: TOTAL DEBT SERVICE AND CAPITAL OUTLAY $61,088,6fi4 :.:TOTAL EXPENDIT[J,RES $202,662,561 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000 0'1' BUDGET . . . . . .. .. . M-4 .', `` . PROJECTED FY 200 cASH F..ow, . UVATER AND SEWER FUND CASH BALANCE AT 9/30100* $ 35',83%827 LESS: USE OF RETAINED EARNINGS $ 5677,6.38 ADJUSTED CASH BALANCE; $ 3©'1fi1,'189 PLUS: ESTIMATED CASH RECEIPTS: SALES OF 1NATERIVVASTEWATER SERVICE $187,114975 CQNNETIONS AND EXTENSIONS $ 1',080817 USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY $ 2,656,fi20 INTERDEPARTMENTAL CHARGES $ 370000 OTHER REVENUE '; $ 5A762t511 ESTIMATED TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS IN 1=Y2000 $202,662;561 LESS; ESTIMATED CASH DISBURSEMENTS .. PERSONNEL COST $ 33,$71,fi60 MATERIALS& SUPPLIES $ 9,109,077 CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS; $ 98,593,160 CAPITAL OUTLAY PURCHASES $ 3,367620 QEBT SERVICE $ 57,721,044 ESTIMATED CASK DISBURSED IN FY2000 $2Q2,662;561 20% RESERVE REQUIREMENT $ 2$,314,779 Less: Unrealized Loss ** ($91,946) ESTIMATEDAVAILABLE CASH AT 9130101 $ 1,754 464 *Preliminary fund balance due.to pending audit of actual ending balances . . . . *';The decrease in the market ualue of the;City's investment portfolio that has not been tui ned into cash. M-5 COMPARISON OF WATER AND SEWER FUND WATER EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00** 2000-01 Administration $1,351,882 $1,229,002 $1,985,629 $2,329,851 $2,376,221 Raw Water Purchase 29,758,267 30,939,421 31,888,021 30,898,476 32,222,429 Engineering 425,520 677,481 769,484 719,419 806,907 Laboratory Services 879,623 838,434 1,041,573 1,023,236 1,032,618 Customer Accounts 2,749,063 2,981,323 3,040,987 3,077,414 5,544,605 Water Production 14,382,719 15,148,474 14,880,995 16,555,570 16,778,025 Field Operations 10,838,235 11,290,736 11,289,743 12,273,996 9,985,067 Bonded Debt Service 8,223,999 17,672,930 19,849,170 19,849,170 23,603,217 Non -Departmental * 1 5,410,269 5,919,844 5,964,640 6,005,041 6,486,031 Water Capital Projects 11.925,310 7.291,590 7,809,702 14,537.133 %684,4458 Water Sub -Total $85,944,887 $93,989,235 $98,519,944 $107,269,306 $108,519,578 * FY1997-98 amount excludes depreciation expense for comparison purposes. ** FY1999-00 reostimate includes supplemental appropriations. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET MET COMPARISON OF WATER AND SEWER FUND WASTEWATER EXPENDITURES Administration Engineering Laboratory Services Customer Accounts & Collections Wastewater Treatment Industrial Waste Sampling Customer City Metering Stations Field Operations Bonded Debt Service Non -Departmental * Wastewater Capital Projects Wastewater Sub -Total ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999.00** 2000-01 $1,793,411 $1,009,339 $1,475,563 $1,811,297 $1,994,306 684,424 726,691 963,368 723,782 871,753 824,142 906,511 1,131,166 1,038,353 1,090,608 2,386,548 2,277,958 2,807,330 2,728,706 3,483,256 17,411,876 16,867,086 18,724,753 19,045,995 18,406,767 721,054 788,302 894.460 1,064,729 178,427 314,759 301,736 340,857 343,594 355,998 9,722,053 8,879,909 8,992,007 9,857,737 9,416,714 14,427,748 27,962,305 30,594,819 32,594,819 34,117,827 6,879,051 7,442,069 8,646,879 9,300,756 8,607,812 15,211,833 8,541.793 13.603.031 13,860.298 15.619.515 $70,376,899 $75,703,699 $88,174,233 $92,370,066 $94,142,983 Water & Sewer Fund Total $156,321,786 $169,692,934 $186,694,177 $199,639,372 $202,662,561 * FY1997-98 amount excludes depreciation expense for comparison purposes. ** FY1999-00 reestimate includes supplemental appropriations. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET IIT, I N COMPARISON OF WATER AND SEWER FUND WATER REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Utility Income Water Service Revenue $67,076,825 $70,050,449 $69,390,295 $72,733,407 $77,500,444 Water Contracts 22,661.767 22.376.790 21,481.973 21,587,197 23,208,839 Sub -Total $89,738,592 $92,427,239 $90,872,268 $94,320,604 $100,709,283 Connections and Extensions Water Taps $386,165 $406,594 $354,242 $333,778 $319,095 Water Extensions 770,097 668,965 398,295 409,824 292,504 Sub -Total $1,156,262 $1,075,559 $752,537 $743,602 $611,599 Use of Money and Property Interest on Investments $900,694 $1,332,889 $1,193,859 $1,110,351 $1,253,520 Real Property Sales 232,961 165,883 0 $386,872 0 Sale of Equipment 242,712 81,900 0 $0 0 Salvage Sales 5,587 2,733 2,330 $1,739 2,300 Sub -Total $1,381,954 $1,583,405 $1,196,189 $1,498,962 $1,255,820 Interdepartmental Charges Waste Disposal Billings $99,999 $100,000 $100.000 $100,000 $185.000 Sub -Total $99,999 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $185,000 Other Revenue Transfer from Capital 'Projects Fund $2,050,527 $2,050,527 $2,050,527 $2,050,527 $2,050,527 Reimbursement from Insurance Fund 5,208 4,103 0 0 0 Reimbursement from Office Services 14,874 14,874 0 17,355 0 Bad Debts Recovered 96,870 86,596 91,279 178,887 100,000 Cross Connection Revenue 125 335 0 100 0 Water Lab Fees 2,965 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue 1,913,227 1,526,946 1.500.061 1,255.385 1,382.745 Sub -Total $4,083,796 $3,683,381 $3,641,867 $3,502,254 $3,533,272 Total Current Water Revenues $96,460,603 $98,869,584 $96,562,861 $100,165.422 $106,294,974 Use of Retained Earnings $1.957.083 $1,957,083 $2,224.604 Total Planned Water Revenues $96,460,603 $98,869,584 $98,519,944 $102,122,505 $108,519,578 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET COMPARISON OF WATER AND SEWER FUND WASTEWATER REVENUES Utility Income Sewer Service Revenue Sewer Contracts Sub -Total Connections and Extensions Sewer Taps Sewer Extensions Sub -Total Use of Money and Property Interest on Investments Salvage Sales Sub -Total Interdepartmental Charges Waste Disposal Billings Sub -Total Other Revenue Industrial Waste Monitoring Fee Transfer from Capital Projects Fund Bad Debts Recovered Miscellaneous Revenue Liquid Waste Program Reimbursement from Office Services Sub -Total Total Current Wastewater Revenues ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999,00 2000-01 $55,139,612 59,936,749 61,410,214 62,979,744 68,501,415 17.750,301 17286.916 17.393.078 16.447.824 17.904, 277 $72,889,913 $77,223,665 $78,803,292 $79,427,568 $86,405,692 $156,975 250,171 240,235 187,361 181,289 119,558 101,940 197,552 475,989 287,929 $276,533 $352,111 $437,787 $663,350 $469,218 $1,560,027 1,074,843 938,032 4,022,735 1,400,000 26,800 62,705 810 0 800 $1,586,827 $1,137,546 $938,842 $4,022,735 $1,400,800 $99,999 99,999 100,000 100,000 185,000 $99,999 $99,999 $100,000 $100,000 $185,000 $267,771 $259,948 $269,164 $274,342 $266,601 1,821,314 1,821,314 1,821,314 1,821,314 1,821,314 25,660 26,372 24,124 36,727 45,000 290,511 33,995 35,028 262,435 64,824 31,646 39,108 24,420 28,114 31,500 14,874 14,874 0 17,355 0 $2,451,776 $2,195,611 $2,174,050 $2,440.287 $2,229,239 $77,305,048 $81,008,934 $82,453,971 $86,653,940 $90,689,949 Use of Retained Earnings ,0 $0 $5.720.262 $5,720,262 $3.453.034 Total Planned Wastewater Revenues $77,305,048 $81,008,934 $88,174,233 $92,374,202 $94,142,983 TOTAL WATER AND WASTEWATER REVENUES $173,765,651 $179,878,518 $186,694,177 $194.496,707 $202,662,561 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER WATER PE45/0601000:0609020 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL_ RESPONSIBILITIES: The Water Department is responsible for providing safe and clean drinking water to the residents of Fort Worth and customer cities. The Water Administration Division is responsible for coordinating all divisions within the department, conducting various in-service training programs for departmental employees, preparing budget requests, compiling reports and information on operations, and coordinating the department's internal and external communications. In addition, the division serves as the departmental liaison on all intergovernmental issues. The City plans requirements for raw water to be sold to citizens and customer cities in the Raw Water Purchase Division. The Engineering Division coordinates with the Engineering Department on water -related projects and performs in-house engineering work. Technical support and laboratory analysis for all other divisions are provided by the Laboratory Services Division. The Customer Account and Collections Division performs billing functions for water, sewer, and refuse collection services, processes orders for new services, collects delinquent accounts, and investigates complaints. The Water Production Division treats and distributes a safe water supply to meet customer needs. The maintenance and construction of the water distribution system is performed by the Water Field Operations Division. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $14,108,186 $14,941,221 $16,194,644 $16,708,844 Supplies 5,312,226 5,752,636 5,676,092 5,675,092 Contracts 55,387,372 55,881,677 60,532,389 60,532,389 Capital Outlay Debt Service Total Allocations Authorized Positions 1,508,521 2,095,240 17,672,930 19,849,170 $93,989,235 366.5 $98,519,944 368.0 2,000,036 2,000,036 23,603,217 23,603,217 $108,005,378 $108,519,578 370.0 370.0 M-9 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET M-10 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER WASTEWATER PE45/0701000:0709020 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Wastewater Department collects, monitors, treats and processes domestic and industrial waterborne waste from Fort Worth and other contracting communities. The Wastewater Department provides adequate sewage pumping capacity to handle all sewage from all areas of the City. The Wastewater P Administration Division investigates complaints, compiles reports, prepares budget requests, responds to numerous day-to-day requests for information or services, and coordinates internal and external communication. In addition, the division serves as the departmental liaison on all intergovernmental issues. Customer Service performs billing functions and responds to citizen inquiries. The Engineering Division coordinates with the Engineering Department on all wastewater related projects and performs in- house engineering work in the Planning/Development and Facilities sections. In addition, technical support and laboratory analysis for all other divisions are provided by the Laboratory Services Division. Responsibilities of the Field Operations Division include replacement, maintenance, and cleaning of the wastewater collection system. Allocations Personal Services Supplies Contracts Capital Outlay Debt Service Total Allocations Authorized Positions Actual Adopted Proposed Budget 1998-99 1999.00 2000-01 $14,763,481 $16,062,467 3,689,166 27,625,558 1,663,189 3,844,189 35,862,408 1,810,350 27,962,305 30,594,819 $75,703,699 $88,174,233 380.5 1 385.0 $16,934,974 3,433,985 38,060,771 1,367, 584 34,117,827 $93,915,141 383.0 Adopted Budget 2000-01 $17,162,816 3,433,985 38,060,771 1,367,584 34,117,827 $94,142;983 383.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Million $ 225-1' 1E 7 _..... ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Project coordinationloversite • Fiscal/grant managementloversite • Administrative services • Information and technical services • Rate hearing 22.0 A. P. _.. FIELD OPERATIONS �A TEF._....:.. ......®. L PRoouCTloN • Administration ° Administration • Technical Services • Holly Treatment Plant • Warehouse .Rolling Hills Plant • Water quality •Eagle Mountain Plant . Maintenance of mains . Wholesale meter stations • Street repair .pumping • Large meters and meter repair • Lake Worth management 106.0 A. P. • Inflow and Infiltration ... • Research and Investigation • Sewer repair • Sewer cleaning and maintenance LABORATORY SERVICES • Preventative maintenance ° Analytical Services P. ° Technical Services 27.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources WATER POLLUTION . .... . TION CONTROL Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant . Industrial waste discharge monitoring • Wholesale customer metering stations 141.0 A. P. CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS AND COLLECTIONS . Administration . Customer service • Bookkeeping and billing • Meter reading • Collection/credit 66.0 A. P. ENGINEERINGITECHNICAL SERVICE Administration • Planning/development Facilities 29.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 O Positions 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Expenditures SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER WATER AND WASTEWATER PE45/0601000:0709020 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $186,694,177 A.P. 753.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $202,662,561 A.P. 753.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $7,277,055 for debt service expense, primarily due to recent debt issues and lower projected use of reserves. 13) The adopted budget increases by $3,891,240 for transfer payments to fund capital projects and to achieve debt coverage ratios required by rating agencies. C) The adopted budget increases by $2,604,854 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. D) The adopted budget increases by $715,678 for projected electricity rate increases. E) The adopted budget decreases by ($635,900) for motor vehicle purchases. F) The adopted budget decreases by ($588,309) for water treatment chemicals based on FY1999-00 expenditure levels and the loss of the City of Arlington as a wastewater treatment customer. G) The adopted budget increases by $513,644 for machinery and equipment maintenance costs. H) The adopted budget increases by $395,318 for industrial waste charges due to a projected increase in raw water purchases. 1) The adopted budget increases by $380,218 for street rental fees. This expense is calculated as a percentage of departmental revenue, which is projected to increase in FY2000-01. J) The adopted budget decreases by ($335,631) for facility repair and maintenance expenses. M-13 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET M-14 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER WATER AND WASTEWATER PE45/0601000:0709020 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $186„694,177 A.P. 753.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $202,662,561 A.P. 753.0 K) The adopted budget increases by $328,349 in contractual expenditures, including customer service upgrades, wholesale meter replacements, and various rental agreements. L) The adopted budget increases by $291,662 in basic telephone services due to a projected rate increase. M) The adopted budget decreases by ($290,000) in office equipment expense due to one- time FY1999-00 purchases. N) The adopted budget decreases by ($284,674) for workers' compensation expense due to the planned use of Workers' Compensation fund balance. ®) The adopted budget increases by $283,849 for computer lease payments. P) The adopted budget increases by $256,468 for radio and communications equipment purchases. Q) The adopted budget increases by $229,456 for group health insurance costs due to projected rate increases and higher enrollment levels. R) The adopted budget increases by $213,581 for retirement contributions, which are calculated as a percentage of increasing salaries. S) The adopted budget increases by $197,090 for consultant fees, including a departmental efficiency study. T) The adopted budget increases by $155,702 for overtime expense based on FY1999-00 expenditure levels and increasing salaries. U) The adopted budget increases by $154,074 for minor equipment purchases. V) The adopted budget increases by $135,351 for specialized equipment purchases, primarily to replace outdated and damaged meter reading equipment. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENDITURES WATER, FY2000-01 Contractual Services 26.1 % Raw Water Purchases Capital 29.7% Expenses Operating Supplies 5.2% Personnel Costs Operating Supplies Contractual Services Raw Water Purchases Capital Expenses Debt Service Total 16,708,844 15.4% 5,675,092 5.2% 23,993,656 29.7% 31,888,021 26.1 % 2,000,036 1.8% 23,603,217 21.8% 108,519,578 100.00% 1 Personnel Costs 15.4% :e Operating Supplies 3.7% Contractual coM„Rea Capital Personnel Costs 18.2% Debt Service 36.2% Personnel Costs 17,162,816 18.2% Operating Supplies 3,433,985 3.7% Contractual Services 38,060,771 40.4% Capital Expenses 1,367,584 1.5% Debt Service 34,117,827 36.2% Total 94,142,983 100.0% DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS WATER FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted PE45 WATER & SEWER Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Water Administration 0601000 Administration $637,541 $708,804 $665,301 $1,179,501 4.0 4.5 6.5 6.5 0601001 Information Technology Service 416,801 865,303 911,428 911,428 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 0601002 Governmental Affairs 57,595 58,666 0 0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0601500 Public Information 117,065 352,856 285,,292 285,292 1.00 1_0 1_0 1.0 Sub -Total $1,229,002 $1,985,629 $1,862,021 $2,376,221 9.0 10.0 10.5 10.5 Raw Water Purchase 0602000 Raw Water Purchase $30.939A21 $31.888.021 $32,222.429 $32,222,429 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sub -Total $30,939,421 $31,888,021 $32,222,429 $32,222,429 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Engineering 0602501 Administration $249,992 ' $350,229 $289,188 $289,188 2.0 2.5 1.5 1.5 0602502 Planning 1 Development 336,199 337,600 358,699 358,699 7.0 8.0 7.5 7.5 0602503 Facilities 91,290 81,655 96,782 96,782 2.0 2.0 2A 2.0 0602504 Governmental Affairs 0 0 62,238 62,238 0_0 0=0 1.0 1.00 Sub -Total $677,481 $769,484 $806,907 $806,907 11.0 12.5 12.0 12.0 Laboratory Services 0603001 Laboratory Services $838.434 $1.041.573 $1.032,618 $1.032.618 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 Sub -Total $838,434 $1,041,573 $1,032,618 $1,032,618 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 0 N N DEPARTMENT WATER FUND PE45 WATER & SEWER Center Center Description Customer Accounts and Collections 0604001 Administration 0604002 Customer Services 0604003 Bookkeeping and Billing 0604004 Satellite Office 0604005 Business Development 0604006 Special Meter Activities 0604007 Collections and Credit 0604008 Wholesale Customers 0604009 Meter Shop Sub -Total Water Production 0605001 Administration 0605002 Holly Plant 0605003 Rolling Hills Plant 0605004 Production Control Center 0605005 Central Maintenance 0605006 Lake Worth Management 0605007 SCADA Control Systems 0605011 Eagle Mountain Lake Plant 0605012 Wholesale Water Customers Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $669,261 $716,363 $790,744 $790,744 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 563,929 560,741 861,218 861,218 15.5 15.5 14.5 14.5 1,306,701 1,274,848 1,209,294 1,209,294 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 0 0 48,368 48,368 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 52,403 51,825 55,864 55,864 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 246,174 283,328 392,760 392,760 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 92,547 87,064 92,543 92,543 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 50,308 66,818 67,069 67,069 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0 0 2.026,745 2,026,745 000 0_0 31.0 31.0 $2,981,323 $3,040,987 $5,544,605 $5,544,605 32.5 33.0 64.0 64.0 $482,904 $556,573 $571,575 $571,575 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 5,937,074 4,886,997 5,159,826 5,159,826 41.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 4,603,565 4,647,912 4,986,751 4,986,751 21.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 1,536,777 1,436,102 1,597,638 1,597,638 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 543,681 722,309 985,455 985,455 13.0 15.0 16.0 16.0 144,404 153,998 184,372 184,372 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 242,687 2337816 233,816 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1,752,598 2,030,454 2,682,860 2,682,860 11.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 147,471 203,963 375,732 375,732 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $15,148,474 $14,880,995 $16,778,025 $16,778,025 105.0 106.0 107.0 107.0 DEPARTMENT WATER FUND PE45 WATER & SEWER Center Center Description Field Operations 0605500 Cross Connections 0607001 Administration 0607002 Technical Services 0607003 Warehouse 0607005 Services, Water Taps 0607006 Water Quality 0607007 Maintenance of Mains 0607011 Street Repair 0607012 Water Maintenance East 0607014 Large Meters Sub -Total Bonded Debt Service 0608001 Bonded Debt Service Sub -Total Non -Departmental 0609000 Non -Departmental 0609010 Rate Hearings 0609020 Water Capital Projects Sub -Total TOTAL WATER DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0 0 196,937 196,937 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 865,808 861,761 823,003 823,003 15.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 444,045 223,228 291,245 291,245 8.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 210,410 218,082 180,409 180,409 5.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 1,401,659 1,572,540 1,469,038 1,469,038 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 319,449 318,840 550,187 550,187 7.0 7.0 11.0 11.0 4,453,933 4,111,049 3,941,970 3,941,970 77.0 78.0 64.0 64.0 1,799,192 2,033,955 2,480,200 2,480,200 25.5 26.5 33.5 33.5 (30) 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.796,270 1.950288 52_,078 52,078 31.0 31.0 0_0 0_0 $11,290,736 $11,289,743 $9,985,067 $9,985,067 194.5 192.0 162.0 162.0 $17,672.930 $19,849.170 $23,603.217 $23,603,217 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $17,672,930 $19,849,170 $23,603,217 $23,603,217 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $5,790,959 $5,869,059 $6,421,450 $6,421,450 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 128,885 95,581 64,581 64,581 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 7,291,590 7,809,702 9,684,458 9,684.458 0=0 0_0 0=0 0_0 $13,211,434 $13,774,342 $16,170,489 $16,170,489 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $93,989,235 $98,519,944 $108,005,378 $108,519,578 366.5 368.0 370.0 370.0 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS WASTEWATER FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted PE45 WATER $ SEWER Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Wastewater Administration 0701000 Administration $607,104 $661,271 $576,202 $804,044 4.0 4.5 6.5 6.5 0701001 Information Technology Service 282,056 508,455 919,073 919,073 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 0701002 Governmental Affairs 57,463 58,880 0 0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0701500 Public Information 62,716 246,957 271,189 271,189 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sub -Total $1,009,339 $1,475,563 $1,766,464 $1,994,306 9.0 10.0 10.5 10.5 Enoineerino 0702501 Administration $255,616 $336,866 $268,462 $268,462 2.0 2.5 1.5 1.5 0702502 Planning / Development 303,341 369,009 347,923 347,923 7.0 8.0 7.5 7.5 0702503 Facilities 167,734 257,493 193,613 193,613 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 0702504 Governmental Affairs 0 0 61.755 61,755 0_0 0_0 1_0 1.0 Sub -Total $726,691 $963,368 $871,753 $871,753 15.0 16.5 16.0 16.0 Laboratory Services 0703001 Laboratory Services $906,511 $1,131,166 $1.090.608 $1.090.608 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 Sub -Total $906,511 $1,131,166 $1,090,608 $1,090,608 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 Customer Accounts and Collections 0704001 Administration $647,909 $698,061 $753,033 $753,033 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0704002 Customer Services 507,227 552,908 853,306 853,306 15.5 15.5 14.5 14.5 0704003 Bookkeeping and Billing 673,158 1,084,345 1,210,083 1,210,083 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 0704004 Satellite Office 0 0 49,599 49,599 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0704005 Business Development 53,520 51,946 56,746 56,746 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0704006 Special Meter Activities 240,748 266,808 397,989 397,989 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 0704007 Collections and Credit 106,128 86,790 94,536 94,536 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 0704008 Wholesale Customers 49,268 66,472 67,964 67,964 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Sub -Total $2,277,958 $2,807,330 $3,483,256 $3,483,256 32.5 33.0 33.0 33.0 DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER FUND PE45 WATER & SEWER Center Center Description Wastewater Treatment 0705002 Wastewater Treatment 0705003 Industrial Waste Sampling 0705004 Customer City Metering 0705500 Environmental Sub -Total Field Operations 0707001 Administration 0707002 Technical Services 0707003 Warehouse 0707006 Sewer Replacement 0707007 Sewer Cleaning/Maintenance 0707008 Street Repair 0707009 Inflow and Infiltration 0707010 Research and Investigation 0707012 Sewer Maintenance East 0707013 Sewer Maintenance West 0707015 Preventive Maintenance Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $16,867,086 $18,724,753 $17,698,562 $17,698,562 120.0 121.0 118.0 118.0 788,302 894,460 178,427 178,427 16.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 301,736 340,857 355,998 355,998 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 0 708,205 708,205 0.0 0.0 16.0 16.0 $17,957,124 $19,960,070 $18,941,192 $18,941,192 140.0 141.0 138.0 138.0 $679,589 $834,126 $821,810 $821,810 15.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 284,997 258,779 335,576 335,576 9.0 6.0 7.0 TO 144,675 170,673 177,325 177,325 5.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3,082,762 3,277,493 3,270,940 3,270,940 55.0 54.0 55.0 55.0 2,276,972 2,096,414 2,263,907 2,263,907 43.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 907,966 899,526 904,948 904,948 12.5 15.5 14.5 14.5 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 375,036 390,219 432,820 432,820 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 (137) 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,180 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.120,869 1.064.777 1,209,388 1,209,388 20.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 $8,879,909 $8,992,007 $9,416,714 $9,416,714 169.5 170.0 171.0 171.0 N Cn DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER FUND PE45 WATER & SEWER Center Center Description Bonded Debt Service 0708001 Bonded Debt Service Sub -Total Non -Departmental 0709000 Non -Departmental 0709010 Rate Hearings 0709020 Sewer Capital Projects Sub -Total TOTAL WASTEWATER DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $27,962,305 $30,594.819 $34,117.827 $34.117.827 0_0 0_0 0=0 000 $27,962,305 $30,594,819 $34,117,827 $34,117,827 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $7,352,031 $8,560,422 $8,473,049 $8,473,049 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90,038 86,457 134,763 134,763 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 8,541,793 13,603,031 15,619,515 15,619.515 0_0 0_0 0i0 0_0 $15,983,862 $22,249,910 $24,227,327 $24,227,327 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $75,703,699 $88,174,233 $93,915,141 $94,142,983 380.5 385.0 383.0 383.0 N-1 FUND: FUND STATEMENT SOLID WASTE The Solid Waste Fund is an Enterprise Fund supported by revenues from charges for collection and disposal services rendered. The Solid Waste Fund's seven divisions, which each perform a distinct solid waste management function, are collectively responsible for providing refuse collection and disposal service. For example, the Administration Division is responsible for daily fund operations, including the management of the other divisions. Residential Collection provides twice -a -week collection service to residents. City crews provide collection services for 20 percent of area households, while private contractors provide service to the remaining 80 percent of households. The City's Solid Waste Department has contract compliance officers to ensure that each contractor meets contract requirements. Residential customers pay for this collection service through a monthly fee added to their water bill. The adopted fee for FY2000-01, at $13.00 per month, represents a $1.25 increase over the previous year's rate. The adopted rate increase is intended to mitigate the cost impact anticipated from the following: 1) issuance of debt to purchase a transfer station to meet future service demands levels; 2) rate increases expected to result from renewal of the Waste Management collection contract; and 3) the potential need to open an additional disposal cell at the Southeast Landfill. Once a month, the Brush and Bulky Waste Division collects items that are too large for normal weekly solid waste collections, including furniture and other household items, large tree limbs, and piles of brush. At the City -operated Southeast Landfill, Fort Worth residents are allowed to dump free of charge, up to four times a month, any non -hazardous residential waste transported to the landfill in an automobile, pick-up or other single -axle vehicle. Non- residents and commercial customers are charged $20 per ton for the total weight of their loads for the same dumping privilege. The Illegal Dump Division is responsible for the removal of unsightly debris from public right- of-ways and vacant lots. The section also sponsors the annual "Don't Waste Fort Worth" program, which targets, for clean up, at least two City Council Districts per month during spring and summer months. Both Illegal Dump and Dead Animal Pick-up operations are supported by various fund revenue sources. Solid Waste Management's Community Education section promotes public education and directs citizen involvement in volunteer activities that encourage individual responsibility for a cleaner city. In FY1998-99, Solid Waste Management implemented a Non -Exclusive Privilege Agreement Fee to charge solid waste commercial haulers, based upon their gross receipts, for their use of public streets, alleys and thoroughfares within Fort Worth for their commercial and municipal solid waste collection activities. The collection of this revenue was necessitated by increasing collection costs, as well as anticipated charges for debt service to be incurred from construction of a transfer station, solid waste collections contract renewals and the possible addition of another disposal cell at the Southeast Landfill. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET . .. .. .. . ... . .. . ... .. . ..... . . . N-3 SOLID'WASTE FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 REVENUES:: Interest on]nvestments $30Q,000 `` Landfill 115,000 1 . Residential Collection 21,820,642 Commercial Collection 646,921 Refuse Coupons 1 t15,372 Refuse Hauling Permits .; .. ` 24,©00 Non=Exclusive Privilege Agreeements 1,,219,452 Dead Animal Pickup 100 Garbage Sales Tax 224,697 Recycling Waste 6,000 Bad Debts Recovered 40,000 Miscellaneous Revenues 25,518 Sale of Solid Waste Iquipment ;; 4,509 TOTAL REVENUES $24;532,2.02 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: Transfer from Office Services Fund 2 800 TOTAL OTI IER FINANCING SOURCES $2,SQ{; TOTAL REVENUES AN.D OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $24,535,002 . PV91TyRES Personal 5ecvices $3,357,425 Supplies 42,605 Contractual Services 19.63Q.766 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES $23,030,796 .Capital Outlay 196,70© . TOTAL EXPENDITURES.; $23227,496 CITY OF FORT WORTH. 2©00. 1 BUDGET t• IN COMPARISON COMPARISON OF SOLID WASTE FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Administration $1,139,915 $1,223,170 $1,133,632 1,590,800 $1,248,056 Collection 16,517,566 17,478,703 17,804,112 18,993,217 $19,514,163 Brush and Bulky Waste 543,919 446,731 536,765 549,247 550,791 Landfill Operations 476,123 651,927 689,850 485,816 614,657 Non -Departmental 0 0 0 0 146,000 Illegal Dump Cleanup 712,118 1,115,904 824,310 824,570 862,398 Dead Animal Pickup 119,503 104,700 113,545 138,954 123,068 Clean City Program 72,017 136,078 170,044 160,692 168,363 TOTAL $19,581,161 $21,157,213 $21,272,258 $22,743,296 $23,227,496 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET N-7 REVENUES Interest on Investments Landfill Residential Collection Commercial Collection Refuse Coupons Refuse Hauling Permits Non-Exlusive Agreements Dead Animal Pickup Garbage Sales Tax Recycling Waste Bad Debts Recovered Miscellaneous Revenues Sale of Solid Waste Equipment TOTAL REVENUES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Environmental Fund Transfer Property and Casualty Insurance Transfer Unemployment Fund Transfer Office Services Transfer Temporary Labor Transfer Prior Year Earnings TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES COMPARISON OF SOLID WASTE FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 $413,126 $378,026 $300,000 85,850 103,825 115,000 17,637, 076 18,799,182 19,261,263 655,229 641,344 642,193 349,785 167,025 200,000 18,455 16,877 17,000 0 864,619 1,114,140 1,470 710 1,500 175,927 190,649 199,035 677 669 300 29,293 42,325 35,080 30,000 21,700 25,518 61.720 59.880 10.000 $19,458,608 $21,286,831 $21,921,029 RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1999-00 2000-01 $339,677 $300,000 115,000 115,000 19,492, 711 21, 820,642 646,921 646,921 105,372 105,372 24,000 24,000 1,415,232 1,219,452 100 100 201,396 224,697 6,000 6,000 40,000 40,000 25,518 25,518 10.000 4.500 $22,421,927 $24,532,202 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,799 2,799 2,800 2,800 2,800 0 0 0 0 0 128,792 (166,933) 0 0 0 $131,591 ($164,134) $2,800 $19, 590,199 $21,122,697 $21, 923, 829 $2,800 $2,800 $22,424,727 $24,535,002 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY (DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER CITY SERVICES - SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PE64/0211001:0211009 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Solid Waste Management Division, which receives supervision and direction from the City Services Department's Administration Division, is responsible for providing refuse collection and disposal services to Fort Worth residents. The division fulfills its duties utilizing both City and contract forces. Solid Waste's seven functional divisions include Administration, Collection, Brush and Bulky Waste, Landfill Operations, Illegal Dump Cleanup, Dead Animal Pickup and Community Education. In addition, the division also includes a non -departmental section for repayment of equipment notes. Solid Waste Management's Community Education section develops programs for, provides assistance to, and educates and directs citizens regarding solid waste issues. It also encourages citizen involvement in volunteer activities that promote individual responsibility for a cleaner Fort Worth. The division also works with and provides assistance to the Code Enforcement Division in its enforcement of the City Code as it relates to illegal dumping and other refuse -related problems. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Personal Services $2,736,436 $3,156,305 $3,308,736 Supplies 56,015 41,801 42,605 Contractual Services 17,977,008 18,074,152 19,630,766 Capital Outlay 387,755 0 196,700 Total Allocations $21,157,213 $21,272,258 $23,178,807 !Authorized Positions 1 78.0 I 78.0 I 78.0 Adopted Budget 2000-01 $3, 357,425 42,605 19,630,766 196,700 $23,227,496 78.0 N-9 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET aSOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1 ______ CITY SERVICES I 1 ADMINISTRATION I I ADMINISTRATION • Division management/planning • Contract management • Customer services 4.0 A. P. RESIDENTIAL COLLECTION BRUSH AND BULKY .11 W UP COMMN A : STE DEAD ANIMAL PICK ITY EDUCATION • Residential collection and • Brush and bulky waste + Removal and disposal Public education programs transportation collection of dead animals • Neighborhood clean-up • Commercial collection • Litter removal programs 3.0 A. P.= 42.0 A. P. 8.0 A. P. 3.0 A. P. ,. O ...6N L It_L OPERATI. .NS ILLEGAL DU....: MP CLEAN UP , • Dump site cleanup • Solid waste disposal • Tire removal/disposal • Regulatory compliance • Code compliance Million $ 25 2 1 1 BUDGET Changes in Resources 5.0 A. P1. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 10 Positions 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 C]Expenditures N-11 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CITY SERVICES - SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PE64/0211001:0211009 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $21,272,258 A.P. 78.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $23,227,496 A.P. 78.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $1,402,603 for other contractual expenses due to the extension of waste collection services to include Lake Country Estates, an increase in the number of households served and contractually determined rate increases. B) The adopted budget increases by $146,000 for debt service payments from the previous purchase of five brush trucks, two garbage trucks, one pick-up truck and one sedan using the Equipment Note Program. C) The adopted budget increases by $187,363 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. D) The adopted budget increases by $69,931 for equipment maintenance to better reflect actual and projected expenditures for vehicle repairs and other Equipment Services Division -related items. E) The adopted budget increases by $50,700 for authorized vehicle replacements for FY2000-01. F) The adopted budget increases by $50,000 for consultant services, due to the anticipated implementation of phases II (design), III (bid process) and IV (construction management) of a transfer station feasibility study. G) The adopted budget decreases by ($30,710) for workers' compensation expenses. The Risk Management Department will absorb a portion of projected citywide FY2000-01 workers' compensation expenses from the Workers' Compensation fund balance. H) The adopted budget increases by $30,658 for retiree group health insurance based on projected FY2000-01 costs. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS CITY SERVICES FUND SOLID WASTE Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted PE64 MANAGEMENT FUND Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0211001 Administration $1,223,170 $1,133,632 $1,199,367 $1,248,056 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0211002 Collection 17,478,703 17,804,112 19,514,163 19,514,163 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 0211003 Brush and Bulky Waste 446,731 536,765 550,791 550,791 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0211004 Landfill Operations 651,927 689,850 614,657 614,657 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0211006 Non -Departmental 0 0 0 146,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0211007 Illegal Dump Cleanup 1,115,904 824,310 862,398 862,398 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 0211008 Dead Animal Pickup 104,700 113,545 123,068 123,068 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0211009 Community Education 136,078 170,044 168,363 168,363 3_0 3_0 3_0 3_0 TOTAL $21,157,213 $21,272,258 $23,032,807 $23,227,496 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 FUND STATEMENT MUNICIPAL GOLF FUND The Municipal Golf Fund was established to offer enjoyable, safe, and comprehensive golf programs. In the 1981-82 fiscal year, the City Council decided that the golf program should be operated as an Enterprise Fund. This action represented a significant policy commitment to the concept of a self-supporting golf program. In May 1982, the Golf Enterprise Fund was established. The purpose of the Golf Division is to provide a safe and comprehensive golf program through quality customer service, community involvement, and responsible golf course management. The Golf Division of the City of Fort Worth Parks and Community Services Department is managed through direct administration of City employees and is divided into four sections: Golf Management, Pro Shop Operations, Snack Shop Operations, and Golf Course Maintenance. In addition, snack shop operations have been contracted at four of the facilities. There are five municipally owned golf courses that promote golf as a lifetime sport. Pecan Valley Golf Course, Z. Boaz Golf Course, Meadowbrook Golf Course, Rockwood Golf Course, and Sycamore Creek Golf Course. Pecan Valley is a 36-hole regulation golf course located in the southwest metropolitan area of Fort Worth. Z. Boaz is an 18-hole regulation golf course located in the western sector. Rockwood is a 27-hole regulation course located in the near northwest. At the eastern edge of the city is the 18-hole regulation length Meadowbrook Golf Course, and in the near southeast is Sycamore Creek Golf Course, a 9-hole regulation course with double tee boxes. O-1 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET o-� MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE fUN© BUDGET SUMMARY . ISCAL YEAR . z000-� . REVENUES: Green Fees Revenue $2,739,616 CartslClubs Revenue 1,288,496 Merchandise Revenue 231,234 Snack Shop Revenue 78,780 Lease - PRP Food 60,000 Miscellaneous Revenuei 209.698` OPERATING REVENUES $4,607,824. Interest on' Investments $74,000 Use of Retained Earnings 1:086'/ . .OTHER REVENUES. $1,1.60,105.' TOTAL REVENUES $5,767,929. k EXPENDITURES; Personal Services $2,834,121 Supplies 608,953 Con#ractual Services 1�579.262 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENSES E $5,022,336 Capital Outlay $0 000 ` Dett Service ii61.593 TOTAL DEBT SERViCE.AND CAPITAL. OUTLAY .....'. $745,593 TOTAL EXPENDITURES` $5,767,929: CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00 01 BUDGET 0-5 COMPARISON OF MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-OD 2000=01 Goff Course Management $605,935 $1,226,184 $615,563 $675,392 $784,936 Non -Departmental 330,768 197,544 497,825 488,087 674,117 Pecan Valley Greens Maint. 737,664 847,187 818,729 839,172 852,472 Pecan Valley Pro Shop 383,507 453,597 411,133 437,593 412,491 Pecan Valley Snack Shop 122,468 0 0 0 0 Z. Boaz Greens Maint. 528,618 504,224 535,318 540,867 501,180 Z. Boaz Pro Shop 142,640 280,908 286,500 303,628 313,663 Z. Boaz Snack Shop 0 25,310 43,593 31,496 46,870 Meadowbrook Greens Maint. 470,019 456,352 521,288 520,215 470,692 Meadowbrook Pro Shop 306,744 335,042 331,453 348,075 261,335 Meadowbrook Snack Shop 113,999 0 0 0 0 Rockwood Greens Maint. 537,028 548,279 603,845 624,941 586,330 Rockwood Pro Shop 236,157 323,503 331,607 357,800 349,035 Rockwood Snack Shop 43,956 0 0 0 0 Sycamore Creek Greens Maintenance 286,579 282,652 270,262 336,132 306,190 Sycamore Creek Pro Shop 192,278 182,115 192,441 199,299 208,618 Sycamore Creek Snack Shop 73,135 9.971_ 0 0 0 TOTAL $5,111,495 $5,672,868 $5,459,557 $5,702,697 $5,767,929 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Q-7 COMPARISON OF MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 PECAN VALLEY GOLF COURSE Green Fees Revenue $0 $1,107,267 $773,130 $773,130 $1,311,450 Carts/Clubs Revenue 9,965 544,585 317,920 317,920 512,300 Merchandise Revenue 0 75,611 53,216 53,216 93,360 Miscellaneous Revenue 2,438 76,164 0 0 90,012 Taxable Revenue -Pro Shop 558,355 0 0 0 0 Snack Shop Revenue 137,280 0 0 0 0 Non -Taxable Revenue 1.135,049 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $1,843,087 $1,803,627 $1,144,266 $1,144,266 $2,007,122 Z. BOAZ GOLF COURSE Green Fees Revenue $0 $351,739 $440,166 $440,166 $403,398 Carts/Clubs Revenue 471 218,924 239,790 239,790 249,270 Merchandise Revenue 0 32,650 48,635 48,635 59,000 Snack Shop Revenue 37,968 67,510 59,853 59,853 78,780 Taxable Revenue - Pro Shop 92,695 3,969 0 0 0 Non -Taxable Revenue 121,254 6,534 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue 27,901 32,880 0 0 33,315 Sub -Total $280,289 $714,206 $788,444 $788,444 $823,763 MEADOWBROOK GOLF COURSE Green Fees Revenue $92 $750,601 $915,293 $915,293 $166,240 Carts/Clubs Revenue 0 335,160 339,547 339,547 47,850 Merchandise Revenue 0 69,873 76,557 76,557 12,720 Miscellaneous Revenue 0 37,883 0 0 4,791 Taxable Revenue- Pro Shop 393,739 0 0 0 0 Snack Shop Revenue 125,935 0 0 0 0 Non -Taxable Revenue 79�50, 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $1,314,816 $1,193,517 $1,331,397 $1,331,397 $231,601 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET • COMPARISON OF MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 ROCKWOOD GOLF COURSE Green Fees Revenue $0 $521,308 $660,538 $660,538 $609,053 Carts/Clubs Revenue 0 334,633 361,759 361,759 365,648 Merchandise Revenue 0 43,163 53,845 53,845 50,000 Snack Shop Revenue 34,064 309 0 0 0 Taxable Revenue - Pro Shop 272,099 0 0 0 0 Non -Taxable Revenue 420,306 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue 1,042 37,111 0 0 34,900 Sub -Total $727,511 $936,524 $1,076,142 $1,076,142 $1,059,601 SYCAMORE CREEK GOLF COURSE Green Fees Revenue $0 $202,684 $220,156 $220,156 $249,475 Carts/Clubs Revenue 0 120,104 118,682 118,682 113,428 Merchandise Revenue 0 16,321 15,945 15,945 16,154 Miscellaneous Revenue 8,970 26,319 1,500 1,500 23,270 Unrealized Gain 46,310 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 146,179 0 0 0 0 Taxable Revenue- Pro Shop 132,190 0 0 0 0 Snack Shop Revenue 34,935 6,282 0 0 0 Non -Taxable Revenue 191 &22 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $560,406 $371,710 $356,283 $356,283 $402,327 OTHER INCOME Miscellaneous Revenue $5,720 $3,105 $4,800 $4,800 $23,410 Transfer from other funds 13,138 11,776 0 0 0 Lease - PRP Food 18,333 60,726 60,000 60,000 60,000 Gain/Loss on Assets (22,515) (104,571) 0 0 0 Lease - International 58,333 0 0 0 0 Lease - American 133,333 0 0 0 0 Interest on Investments 0 109,485 95,000 95,000 74,000 Use of Reserves 0 0 604,628 604,628 1,086,105 Z. Boaz Sale of Asset 0 15,100 0 0 0 Meadowbrook Sale of Asset 0 f431 0 0 0 Sub -Total $206,342 $95,190 $764,428 $764,428 $1,243,515 TOTAL $4,932,451 $5,114,774 $5,460,960 $5,460,960 $5,767,929 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER MUNICIPAL. GOLF COURSE FUND PE39/0804005:0804530 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Municipal Golf Courses offer enjoyable, safe, and comprehensive golf programs through five municipally -owned golf courses: Pecan Valley Golf Course, Z. Boaz Golf Course, Meadowbrook Golf Course, Rockwood Golf Course and Sycamore Creek Golf Course. Pecan Valley Golf Course is a 36-hole facility located in the southwest part of the City with a fully -equipped pro shop, snack shop, and driving range. Z. Boaz Golf Course and Meadowbrook Golf Course are 18-hole facilities located in the west and east sides of the City, respectively. Each has a fully -equipped pro shop. Rockwood Golf Course is a 27-hole facility with a pro shop located in the near northwest part of the City. The Sycamore Creek Golf Course is a nine -hole golf course with a pro shop and a snack shop located in the near southeast part of the City. Sycamore Creek was reconstructed during FY1992-93. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $2,413,680 $2,523,597 $2,754,533 $2,834,121 Supplies 647,660 797,136 $608,953 $608,953 Contractual Services 2,142,919 1,464,638 $1,579,262 $1,579,262 Capital Outlay 280,409 186,100 $84,000 $84,000 Debt Service 188,200 488,087 $661,593 $661,593 Total Allocations $5,672,868 $5,459,557 $5,688,341 $5,767,929 Authorized Positions 64.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET MUNICIPAL0-10 -. 63.0 .., I-------------1 IPARKS AND COMMUNITYI I SERVICES ADMINISTRATION • Program management • Public relations • Facilities planning PECAN VALLEY Z. B )AZ GOLF COURSE GOLF COURSE • Grounds/equipment • Groundslequipment maintenance maintenance • Public relations Public relations • Golf instruction • Golf instruction • Tournaments • Tournaments • Clinics • Clinics • Clubhouse management • Clubhouse management • Merchandise sales • Merchandise sales 18.0 A. P. 10.0 A. P. Million $I- 6- 4 3 1 0 BUDGET Changes in Resources MEADOWBROOK GOLF COURSE • Grounds/equipment maintenance • Public relations • Golf instruction • Tournaments • Clinics • Clubhouse management • Merchandise sales 11.0 A. P. 80-11", 5.0 A. P. I ROCKWOOD i SYCAMORE CREEK GOLF COURSE GOLF COURSE • Grounds/equipment • Grounds/equipment maintenance maintenance • Public relations • Public relations • Golf instruction . Golf instruction • Tournaments • Tournaments • Clinics • Clinics • Clubhouse management . Clubhouse management • Merchandise sales • Merchandise sales 13.0 A. P. 6.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1ElPositions I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 l7 Expenditures I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 0-11 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND PE39/0804005:0804530 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $5,459,557 A.P. 64.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $5,767,929 A.P. 63.0 A) The adopted budget includes the deletion of an Account Clerk position, which is partially offset by an increase in temporary labor for extra help during the busy periods of the year. B) The adopted budget increases by $231,609 for actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $173,506 for principle and interest payments in the debt service fund to support the renovations to the Pecan Valley and Meadowbrook golf courses. D) The adopted budget decreases by ($53,910) for agricultural and botanical supplies based on actual and projected spending levels. E) The adopted budget increases by $59,116 for administrative service charges, based on cost projections. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET CITY 'OF FORT WORTH 2O.0.0-01 BUU.GET n 1994-95 ACTUALS NUMBER OF ROUNDS PLAYED -1 -% N N 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o .. _ 1996-97 ACTUAL 1997-98 ACTUAL 1998-99 ACTUAL 1999-00 ESTI MATH 2000-01 PROJECTEC W 0 0 0 0 0 i DEPARTMENT PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND PE39 MUNICIPAL GOLF FUND Center Center Description Golf Course Manaqement 0804005 Golf Course Management 0804090 Non -Departmental Sub -Total Pecan Valley Golf Course 0804110 Greens Maintenance 0804120 Pro Shop 0804130 Snack Shop Sub -Total Z. Boaz Golf Course 0804210 Greens Maintenance 0804220 Pro Shop 0804230 Snack Shop Sub -Total Meadowbrook Golf Course 0804310 Greens Maintenance 0804320 Pro Shop 0804330 Snack Shop Sub -Total Rockwood Golf Course 0804410 Greens Maintenance 0804420 Pro Shop 0804430 Snack Shop Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,226,184 $615,563 $705,348 $784,936 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 197,544 497,825 674,117 6774,117 0=0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $1,423,728 $1,113,388 $1,379,465 $1,459,053 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 $847,187 $818,729 $852,472 $852,472 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 453,597 411,133 412,491 412,491 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 0 0 0 0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0,y0 $1,300,784 $1,229,862 $1,264,963 $1,264,963 19.0 19.0 18.0 18.0 $504,224 $535,318 $501,180 $501,180 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 280,908 286,500 313,663 313,663 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 25,310 43,593 46,870 46,870 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $810,442 $865,411 $861,713 $861,713 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 $456,352 $521,288 $470,692 $470,692 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 335,042 331,453 261,335 261,335 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 0 0 0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $791,394 $852,741 $732,027 $732,027 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 $548,279 $603,845 $586,330 $586,330 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 323,503 331,607 349,035 349,035 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 0 0 0 0_0 0=0 0_0 0_0 $871,782 $935,452 $935,365 $935,365 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 DEPARTMENT PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND PE39 MUNICIPAL GOLF FUND Center Center Description Svcamore Creek Golf Course 0804510 Greens Maintenance 0804520 Pro Shop 0804530 Snack Shop Sub -Total TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adapted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $282,652 $270,262 $306,190 $306,190 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 182,115 192,441 208,613 208,618 3-0 3.0 3.0 3.0 9,971 0 0 0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0,.0 $474,738 $462,703 $514,808 $514,808 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 $5,672,868 $5,459,557 $5,688,341 $5,767,929 64.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 I FUND: P-1 FUND STATEMENT AIRPORTS FUND The Airports Fund, one of several City enterprise funds, must be self -supported from the revenue it generates. The Aviation Department, which manages the Airports Fund, relies on that fund to finance the promotion, development, maintenance, and protection of all City aviation assets, as well as the maintenance of optimal facilities and services. With effective departmental stewardship of the Fund, the Fort Worth airports system makes a significant contribution to the City. All City of Fort Worth airports are designated as general aviation/reliever airports for the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, collectively supporting over 400,000 flight operations in 1999. The Aviation Department is responsible for maintaining, managing, operating, developing, and promoting two of the three airports in the City's airport system: Fort Worth Meacham International Airport and Fort Worth Spinks Airport. The department also provides information and recommendations to the Aviation Advisory Board, which in turn makes recommendations to the City Council regarding all City aviation policies and assets. Although the City of Fort Worth owns Alliance Airport, it is currently under private management. The contracting firm is responsible for Alliance's maintenance and daily operations. The Airports Fund is supported by several revenue sources, including, but not limited to: aircraft landing fees, terminal building and hangar lease agreements, lease fees for both improved and unimproved land at the airports, fuel purchases through the City's Fixed Base Operation (FBO) at Spinks Airport, a profit-sharing arrangement with Alliance Airport, and proceeds from possession fees for the Greater Southwest International Airport. Fund expenditures include personnel costs for an Aviation departmental staff of 30, operating supplies, capital equipment, such as vehicles and maintenance equipment, and debt service for bonds or certificates of obligation sold on the department's behalf. In compliance with the FY1999-00 Financial Management Policy Statements (FMPS), the department applied a "conservative, objective and analytical approach when preparing revenue estimates," (FMPS, Ch. 1, Section F) to maintain the current service provision levels. Similarly, the FY2000-01 adopted budget was developed based on dual FMPS directives: 1) the avoidance of operating deficits (FMPS; Ch. II, Section B); and 2) the maintenance of capital assets (FMPS, Ch. Il, Section C). After careful analysis, Aviation made a number of expenditure reductions, while ensuring that allocations remained at levels sufficient to protect the City's aviation investment and maintaining current service levels. In addition, per the FMPS directive, the Aviation Department has sought and been awarded grants, among them a Federal Aviation Administration grant for noise mitigation and Texas Department of Transportaion grants for assisted airport development and the Routine Airfield Maintenance Program (RAMP), which "address the City's current priorities and policy objectives," (FMPS, Ch. Vill), such as infrastructure maintenance. Finally, by providing for the financing necessary to maintain the aviation infrastructure, Aviation promotes the "positive business environment" (FMPS, Ch. IX, Section A) advocated in the FMPS. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET AIRPORTS FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 REVENUES: Interest on Investments $20,000 Tower',Lease'Income 523,535 -Fuel Sales ` 533,3.71 Fuel Flowage Fees 399,8$6 Aircraft Landing Fees ` 16,000 Land Rental Fees (improved and Unimproved) 531,368 Terminal Building Revenue` 205,608 Hangar Revenue .482,130 Car Rental 6,678 Other Budding Revenue 40 150 Miscellaneous Revenue 85,746 Alliance Revenue Sharing 198,000 G.S.I. A. Payment..:...65 575 TOTAL REVENUES::: $31081045 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services $1276,444 Supplies 615,63{3 Contractual Services 615.12`1 TOTALRECURRING EXPENDITURES $2407,195 Capital,Outlay $92,402 Debt Service ' 6851375 TOTAL DEBT.SERVICE AND CAPITAL OUTLAY $677,777 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3'084,972 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET P-5 COMPARISON OF AIRPORTS FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98* 1998-99* 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 General Administration $272,369 $242,187 $299,332 $272,369 $328,566 Airport Operations 974,316 974,575 915,568 983,172 879,366 Security 278,704 202,794 233,208 271,152 240,651 Non -Departmental* 923,451 804,582 144,754 383,621 246,609 Maintenance 807,279 845,364 769,952 875,020 900,878 Aircraft Fueling Operations 353,742 383,624 427,701 334,920 488.902 TOTAL $3,609,861 $3,453,116 $2,790,515 $3,120,254 $3,084,972 # Actual expenditures exclude Great Southwest International Airport (GSIA) payments, and depreciation amounts. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET P-7 COMPARISON OF AIRPORTS FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Interest on Investments ($8,589) ($50) $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Unrealized Gain 511 (511) 0 0 0 Auction Revenue 0 5,950 0 0 0 Gain on Sale of Assets 198,659 97,613 0 0 0 FAA Lease Revenue 456,529 523,535 498,032 523,535 523,535 Fuel Sales 331,823 352,580 405,000 416,050 533,371 Transfer from General Fund 0 48,114 0 0 0 Transfer From Self Insurance 56,008 3,037 0 0 0 Alliance Revenue Sharing 32,558 179,117 172,500 172,500 198,000 Fuel Flowage Fees 305,689 328,032 359,000 356,438 399,886 Landing Fees 110,254 14,831 16,000 13,447 16,000 Land (Improved) 92,932 84,096 92,956 81,600 129,685 Aircraft Parking 0 648 200 360 2,185 Miscellaneous Operations 10,083 104,527 15,780 14,500 15,350 Auto Rental 10,841 0 6,000 1,764 5,878 Auto Park Revenue 857 849 0 771 800 Terminal Building Revenue 185,178 122,953 208,000 120,396 205,608 Hangar Rentals 552,012 570,622 361,600 462,024 482,130 Other Building Revenue 7,388 28,152 43,900 5,000 40,650 Land (Unimproved) 469,376 335,680 497,376 348,549 401,681 Miscellaneous Income 0 24,800 1,000 3,200 2,850 Miscellaneous UH Revenue 45,927 58,445 59,385 38,556 58,261 Restaurant Income 46,600 0 6,600 6,600 6,600 G.S.LA. 63,615 135,724 65,575 65,575 65,575 TOTAL $2,968,251 $3,018,744 $2,828,904 $2,650,865 $3,108,045 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER AVIATION PE40/0551000:0556002 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Aviation Department operates the City's multi -airport system, which includes Fort Worth Meacham International Airport, Fort Worth Spinks Airport, and Alliance Airport. The department is responsible for. contract administration for Alliance Airport, which is under private management with a contracted firm that is responsible for its upkeep and daily operation. These airports are designed to relieve DIFW International Airport of general aviation pressures. The Aviation Director is responsible for planning, supervising, developing and promoting these facilities and providing information and guidance to the Aviation Advisory Board, which makes recommendations to the City Council regarding management, operation and maintenance of the City's aviation facilities. The Airport Administration Division is responsible for grant applications, project coordination, contract monitoring, clerical support, and overall departmental management. The Airport Operations Divisions maintains airport grounds, coordinates building maintenance, oversees field mowing, and helps maintain general airport security. Allocations Personal Services Supplies Contractual Services Capital Outlay Debt Service Total Allocations Authorized Positions Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,110,054 $1,299,015 $1,226,073 $1,276,444 401,102 452,096 515,630 515,630 5,493,212 564,029 615,121 615,121 71,664 0 92,402 92,402 497,475 475,375 585,375 585,375 $7,573,507 $2,790,515 46.00 30.00 $3,034,601 30.00 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET $3,084,972 30"00 P-10 AVIATION ® 30.0 A. P. ADMINISTRATION • Departmental management • Project coordination/oversite • Fiscal/grant managementloversite • Administrative services 4.0 A. P. FORT INTERNATIONAL AIRP ORT WORTH MEAC III OR FORT WORTH AIRPORTPINK ALLIANCE AIRTH PORT �. 0.0 A.P. AIRPORT OPERATIONS:... ,,.. AIRPORT OPERATIONS A : - • Field operations • Field operations • Terminal operations • Terminal operations ?:0 A -1 0 A. 1P . . . ................................ .... . . . . .......... . . ..... AIRPORT ..... ...... .. .. .. . . . . .... .... - ........ .............. ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE • Field maintenance . Building electrical • Custodial services • Airfield electrical • Building maintenance ............................„......._1, P. :'A. AIRPORT.SECUR[TY • Field security • Terminal security BUDGET Million $ Changes in Resources 4.0---' L' .. . I .... ........... I .......... . L... I . ..I I I I I . . I , . ... . .. , . , .... , . AIRPORT MAINTEN ANCE • Field operations • Building maintenance • Oak Grove maintenance ..,...... 3.0 A. P. FIELD s...:.SE . A D OPERATIONS • Aircraft fueling 4.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 50-11" . I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Positions 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 E3 Expenditures I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES P-11 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER AVIATION PE40/0551000:0556002 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $2,790,515 A.P. 30.00 2000-01 ADOPTED: $3,084,972 A.P. 30.00 A) The adopted budget increases by $110,000 for Certificates of Obligation at Meacham Airport. B) The adopted budget decreases by ($92,085) in Terminal Leave because there are no scheduled retirements this year. C) The adopted budget increases by $69,330 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. D) The adopted budget increases by $37,702 for mowers in need of replacement or repair. E) The adopted budget increases by $33,361 for paving materials based on projected needs and FY1999-00 actual expenditures. F) The adopted budget increases by $25,000 for IT Solutions Department charges due to rate increases. G) The adopted budget decreases by ($10,000) for advertising due to under -use of the account for two consecutive years. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 7.5% $14;c DEPARTMENT AVIATION FUND PE40 AIRPORTS FUND Center Center Description Administration 0551000 General Administration Sub -Total Airport Operations 0552001 Ft. Worth Meacham Airport 0552002 Ft. Worth Spinks Airport 0552003 Ft. Worth Alliance Airport Sub -Total Airport Securitv 0553010 Ft. Worth Meacham Airport Sub -Total Non -Departmental 0554000 Non -Departmental Sub -Total Airport Maintenance 0555001 Ft. Worth Meacham Airport 0555002 Ft. Worth Spinks Airport 0555010 Electrical Maintenance Sub -Total Aircraft Fuel Operations 0556002 Fuel Operation Sub -Total TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1999-98 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $366,626 $299,332 $278,195 $328,566 5.0 4.00 4.0 4.0 $366,626 $299,332 $.278,195 $328,566 5.0 4.00 4.0 4.0 $330,535 $268,307 $276,356 $276,356 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 146,565 171,886 127,635 127,635 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 497,475 475,375 475,375 475,375 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $974,575 $915,568 $879,366 $879,366 6.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $202,794 $233.208 $240.651 $240,651 12.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 $202,794 $233,208 $240,651 $240,651 12.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 $4,800,534 $144,754 $246,609 $246,609 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $4,800,534 $144,754 $246,609 $246,609 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $524,793 $520,848 $600,169 $600,169 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 232,723 149,167 201,273 201,273 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 87,838 99,937 99,436 99,436 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $845,354 $769,952 $900,878 $900,878 20.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 $383.624 $427,701 $488.902 $488,902 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $383,624 $427,701 $488,902 $488,902 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $7,573,507 $2,790,515 $3,034,601 $3,084,972 46,0 30.0 30.0 30.0 T V Q-1 FUND: FUND STATEMENT MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES The Municipal Parking Facilities Fund is an Enterprise Fund of the City of Fort Worth that generates revenues from fees charged for the use of parking and the lease of office spaces. Parking spaces not allocated nor used for transitory parking are leased either to the public or to City employees at a fixed monthly rate. Allocated parking spaces in the Municipal Parking Garage are assigned routinely to the Mayor, the City Manager, Assistant City Managers, Assistants to the City Manager, Department Heads and Assistant Department Heads. Available office space, which is located on the ground level of the garage, is leased to either City departments or to the public for a fixed monthly fee. All parking spaces are clearly marked and numbered. Transitory parking spaces are labeled "in -and -out" on the markings indicating space numbers. The Municipal Parking Facilities Division is under the direction of the Transportation and Public Works Department. The division maintains and manages two parking garages and nine surface lots that provide parking space both for City vehicles and the personal vehicles of City employees. These parking facilities serve as an incentive to reduce traffic and pollution by providing special reduced rates to employees who carpool in groups of three or more. The Municipal Parking Facilities staff is also responsible for the collection of revenue from parking meters and for the security of the City's downtown office complex. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Q-3 MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 REVENUES: Interest on investments $17,000 Parking Lot Rentals 38,340 Parking Space Rentals 124,652 Parking - Tax Exempt 31,140 Office Space Rentals 54,938 Recovery of Utilities 400 Late Payments 600 TOTAL REVENUES $266,970 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services $43,183 Supplies 1,050 Contractual Services 214.025 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $258,258 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET PROJECTED UNRESERVED RETAINED EARNINGS MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES FUND Unreserved retained earnings as of 9/30/00 Plus: Projected Revenues Less: Projected Expenditures Unreserved retained earnings as of 9/30/01 Less: Unrealized Loss'" Unreserved retained earnings as of 9/30/01 $1,172,168 $266, 970 ($258,258) $1,180,880 ($733) $1,180,147 'Preliminary fund balance due to pending audit of actual ending balances ** The decrease in the market value of the City`s investment portfolio that has not been turned into cash. Q-5 COMPARISON OF MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Municipal Parking Facilities $675.648 $232,247 $252.753 $252.753 $258,258 TOTAL $675,648 $232,247 $252,753 $252,753 $258,258 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Q-7 COMPARISON OF MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Interest on Investments $39,806 ($8,680) $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 Parking Lot Rentals 35,654 37,022 38,338 41,095 38,340 Parking Space Rentals 146,608 156,242 124,652 132,115 124,652 Parking - Tax Exempt 31,867 31,220 31,140 37,244 31,140 Office Space Rentals 33,029 31,645 44,690 46,891 54,938 Radisson Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 Recovery of Utilities 0 0 400 400 400 Concession Fees 0 0 0 0 0 Late Payments 490 300 500 2.727 500 TOTAL $287,454 $247,749 $256,720 $277,472 $266,970 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES PE59/0208500:0208501 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Municipal Parking Facilities, under the direction of the Transportation and Public Works Department, maintains and manages two parking garages and nine surface lots providing space for City vehicles and personal vehicles of City employees. Parking space and office space not needed by the City are leased to the general public. The Municipal Parking Facilities Division also collects revenue from parking meters and assures the security of the City's downtown office complex. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $25,630 $37,952 $38,027 $43,183 Supplies 667 1,050 1,050 1,050 Contractual Services 205,950 213,751 214,025 214,025 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $232,247 $252,753 $253,102 $258,258 Authorized Positions 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Thousand $ 300!X 2 2 1 1 TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS i 1 � 1 � ------------------------ MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES • Off-street parking for City vehicles • Off-street parking leases for private vehicles On -site office and commercial space leases 1.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 €l Expenditures AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 2.0- 1.5 0.5-- 2001 DEPARTMENTAL MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED 'ADOPTED '1998-991999-00 , .. 2000 01 CITY 'OF FC DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS FUND PE59 MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES Center Center Description DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0208500 Parking Facilities Administration $212,402 $225,753 $226,102 $231,258 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0208501 Main Street Plaza Garage 19,845 27,000 27,000 27,000 0_0 0_0 0^0 0_0 TOTAL $232,247 $252,753 $253,102 $258,258 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 FUND: FUND STATEMENT INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Internal Service Funds finance the goods and/or services provided by one department of the City of Fort Worth to another. Departments utilizing services provided in-house are charged a fee by the Internal Service Fund department providing the service. The Internal Service Fund departments depend upon revenue generated from those fees to support all departmental functions. The City currently operates five funds on this basis: Equipment Services, Information Systems, Engineering, Office Services and Temporary Labor. The Equipment Services Fund enables the Equipment Services Division of the City, Services Department to maintain and repair all City vehicles and manage the City's motor pool. The Information Systems Fund supports all operations of the City's Information Technology (IT) Solutions Department. The IT Solutions Department manages all City information services, including technical support, electronic systems development and telecommunications. The Engineering Fund, through the Engineering Department, provides engineering services for all City departments. Engineering services provided include design, project management, surveying, quality control testing and construction inspection for all water, storm drain, sidewalk and other infrastructure development. The Office Services Fund provides for the mailroom, copy machine, print shop and graphics services used by all City departments. The Temporary Labor Department, under Human Resources Department management, depends upon proceeds from the Temporary Labor Fund to maintain the pool of temporary employees requested by City departments to fill their non -technical short- term labor needs. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-1 FUND: FUND STATEMENT EQUIPMENT SERVICES DIVISION The Equipment Services Division (ESD) is an Internal Service Fund that operates under the direction and supervision of the Administration Division of the City Services Department and is charged with maintaining the City's vehicular and equipment fleet. ESD procures and services vehicles and equipment for all City departments. In fact, the Equipment Services Fund (the Fund) is principally sustained by revenues received from the interdepartmental billing of departments for the provision of fuel, parts and other ESD-related services. An administrative charge, added to all auto parts, maintenance work, and other fleet -related services provided to City departments, is included in the interdepartmental charges. ESD operates the following six service centers, located throughout the city: Harley, Southside, Brennan, Water and Sewer, Downtown, and the Tire Shop. Each service center stocks a wide variety of auto parts, functions as a fueling station for unleaded gas and/or propane, and provides vehicle and equipment repair and maintenance. In a continuing effort to provide the best possible quantity and quality of fleet services, the Equipment Services Division also contracts a wide variety of fleet -related services. These services are contracted out for the following reasons; 1) when the required expertise is not available in-house; 2) when a substantial capital investment would be necessary to perform the service in-house; 3) when it is determined that the service could be performed less expensively by an outside vendor; or 4) when workload overflow relief is needed. A few of the many services for which it has been deemed advantageous to contract to a private entity are as follows: air conditioning repairs and rebuilds, body repairs, brake repairs and rebuilds, carburetor repairs, exhaust system repairs and rebuilds, engine tune-ups/analysis, factory transmission overhauls, fuel injector and pump repairs and rebuilds, and hydraulic motor, pump, valve and cylinder repairs and rebuilds. In FY1995-96, ESD implemented a vehicle replacement plan. As a part of that plan, each year ESD analyzes the entire City fleet, evaluating each vehicle's maintenance costs, useful life and mileage or hours of wear -and -tear. Based on that yearly analysis, ESD compiles a prioritized vehicle replacement list, then subsequently meets with departments to fine-tune those vehicle rankings. The refined list is then used to determine replacement vehicle priorities for the coming fiscal year. Under the United States Clean Air Act, at least 20 percent of fleets in cities, like Fort Worth, that are in areas of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) air quality non - attainment must be comprised of alternatively fueled vehicles. Currently, Fort Worth exceeds the mandated percentage, requiring that 50 percent of City vehicles purchased be alternatively fueled. R-3 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-5 EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 RI=j/ENLIES. interest on Investments $38,70O Motor Pool Revenue 40,00D f=quipment Maintenance 6280,000 Fuel Overhead, 460,000 Motor Vehicle Repair Paris 750,00{i Other Labor Charges ' 16,365 Sale of Auto Parts 8,Ot}0 Used Parts and Oil 12,500 Sale of Equipment 70,00p Fuel Costs 1532,035 Repair and Maintenance Parts 2000,000 Outside Repair. . 1044,872 O. utside Repair;'Overhead 104,467 Lubricant Costs $5,000 Lubricant Costs Overhead 10,95D Fuel Cards 2,000 ' Unemployment Transfer 19,092 Gas Tax Refund 40,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 30,003 A Reeu 'v 05E0 ,. TOTALREVENUES $12,638,784 ExlrWDITVEs: Persona( Services $6,720 564 Supplies.` 3,769,346. Contractual Services 1892.569 . TOTAL EXPENDITURES $12,382,479 R-7 COMPARISON OF EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Administration $931,009 $894,315 $1,113,429 $1,064,932 $1,638,765 Equipment Materials 783,120 775,424 775,686 728,380 835,882 Harley Service Center 2,055,573 1,968,404 1,939,205 2,151,478 1.619,531 Southside Service Ctr. 879,103 975,315 866,482 829,746 696,622 Brennan Service Center 1,989,316 1,919,792 1,835,262 2,168,382 1,216,255 Water/Sewer Svc, Ctr. 1,009,040 980,255 943,397 1,218,131 744,654 Downtown Service Ctr. 1,728,268 1,465,712 1,310,583 1,446,552 974,230 Fuel Services 2,445,264 2,170,297 1,759,870 2,483,131 438,928 Technical Services 228,124 230,727 201.130 243,589 246,944 Tire Shop 662,586 695,709 532.005 736,921 238,630 Fuel & Parts Charges 0 0 0 0 3,732,038 TOTAL $12,711,403 $12,075,950 $11,277,049 $13,071,242 $12,382,479 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET me COMPARISON OF EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Interest on Investment $59,695 $1,492 $85,000 $2,345 $38,700 Motor Pool Revenue 33,056 28,033 28,000 23,370 40,000 Equipment Maintenance 4,366,526 4,053,901 5,354,420 4,662,333 6,280,000 Fuel Overhead 531,760 319,676 294,000 317,264 460,000 Repair Parts Overhead 744,923 717,545 613,586 720,381 750,000 Motor Vehicle Repair Parts 2,641,381 2,549,615 2,191,381 2,444,460 2.000,000 Other Labor Charges 22,205 9,464 34,300 11,680 16,365 Sale of Auto Parts 3,746 11,291 4,000 0 8,000 Zoo Equipment Repairs 2,611 0 20,000 0 0 Used Parts and Oil 7,618 8,858 12,500 10,621 12,500 Sale of Equipment 9,032 21,400 70,000 8,066 70,000 Fuel Costs 1,533,392 1,789,761 1,500,000 2,542,114 1,532,035 Outside Repair 878,761 785,359 1,044,672 995,901 1,044,672 Outside Repair Overhead 43,938 39,268 52,234 49,795 104,467 Lubricant Casts 69,133 105,484 103,000 90,187 85,000 Lubricant Costs Overhead 16,993 14,768 10,950 11,682 10,950 Fuel Cards 0 0 2,000 0 2,000 Other Transfers 329,637 0 0 0 0 Transfers - Self -Insurance 0 0 0 6,661 0 Unemployment Transfer 0 0 19,092 0 19,092 Gas Tax Refund 0 38,690 35,000 47,750 40,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 70,135 767 25,000 107,893 30,003 EPA Revenue 92,510 63,331 92,509 123,607 95,000 TOTAL $11,457,052 $10,558,703 $11,591,644 $12,176,110 $12,638,784 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CITY SERVICES - EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND P16110212010:0219910 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Equipment Services Division (ESD) is responsible for vehicle and equipment acquisition, monitoring, servicing, and repair for the entire City fleet. The division receives direction and supervision from the Department of City Services, Administration Division. Field services, mechanical maintenance and fuel, lubricant and other supplies are provided by the following six service centers: Harley, Southside, Brennan, Water and Sewer, Downtown, and the Tire Shop. ESD also contracts certain services to outside entities when contracting is deemed the most efficient and effective means to provide the required service. As an Internal Service Fund, the majority of ESD's operating funds come from reimbursements from other City departments for all fuel, parts, and services provided. The application of an administration fee to all charges allows ESD to support its general, non - department specific administrative functions. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Personal Services $5,571,007 $6,049,306 $6,310,224 Supplies 4,537,866 3,395,362 3,769,346 Contractual Services 1.947,263 1,811,381 1,892,569 Capital Outlay 19,814 21,000 0 Total Allocations $12.075,950 $11,277,049 $11,972,139 Authorized Positions 153.0 153.0 148.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Adopted Budget 2000-01 $6,720,564 3,769,346 1,892,569 0 $12,382,479 148.0 R-11 R-12 Million $ 1st EQUIPMENT SERVICES - 148.0 A. P. r_—www____- CITY SERVICES t � AI)MiNISTRATION • Departmental management • Project coordination/oversight • Fiscal/grant managementloversight • Administrative services 8.0 A. P. MAINTENANCE TECHNICAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT MAL TERLA::S , • Harley Service Center • Southslde Service Center • Bid evaluation Maintenance of parts • Brennen Street Service Center • Automated fuel system Inventory for all service • Water and Sewer Service operation and maintenance centers Center • Fuel and oil inventory 26.0 A. P. . . Downtown Service Center Division safety • Tire Shop • Division technical training 107.0 A. P. 7.0 A. P. BUDGET AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Resources Changes in Strength 1 1 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 El Expenditures 1. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113 Positions SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES R-13 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CITY SERVICES - EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND P161/0212010:0219910 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $11,277,049 A.P. 153.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $12,382,479 A.P. 148.0 A) The adopted budget decreases by ($148,985) for employee salaries and group health insurance due to deletion of five vacant Mechanic positions at various service centers. D) The adopted budget increases by $539,750 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $245,038 for unleaded and diesel fuel costs, based on a 42 percent increase in fuel costs in FY1999-00 and the expectation that those higher fuel costs will continue in FY2000-01. D) The adopted budget increases by $134,470 for motor vehicle repair parts due to an increase of approximately 34 percent in the cost of motor vehicle parts in FY1999-00 and the expectation that such price levels will continue in FY2000-01. E) The adopted budget increases by $84,750 for IT Solutions Department charges based on current usage and projected FY2000-01 rates. F) The adopted budget increases by $74,665 due to a reduction in the amount of budgeted salary savings to offset the deletion of five Mechanic positions. G) The adopted budget increases by $66,919 for outside body repairs to reflect historical expenditure patterns. H) The adopted budget decreases by ($63,531) for workers' compensation expenses due to planned use of Workers' Compensation fund balance in FY2000-01. 1) The adopted budget increases by $62,050 for group health per projected FY2000-01 rate increases. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01BUDGET 14000 12000 (n 10000 Z f� �- U) 0 0 s000 U 2 H 6000 Z 2000 0 12,475 11,971 11,557 11,259 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL FISCAL YEARS i i,4!oi 1999-00 2000-01 ESTIMATED PROJECTED R-17 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS CITY SERVICES FUND EQUIPMENT SERVICES Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted PI61 FUND Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0212010 Administration $894,315 $1,113,429 $1,228,425 $1,638,765 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0212015 Equipment Materials 775,424 775,686 835,882 835,882 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 0212030 Harley Service Center 1,968,404 1,939,205 1,619,531 1,619,531 32.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 0212035 Southside Service Center 975,315 866,482 696,622 696,622 18.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 0212045 Brennan Service Center 1,919,792 1,835,262 1,216,255 1,216,255 22.0 26.0 24.0 24.0 0212050 Water & Sewer Center 980,255 943,397 744,654 744,654 12.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 0212055 Downtown Center 1,465,712 1,310,583 974,230 974,230 24.0 24.0 22.0 22.0 0212070 Fuel Services 2,170,297 1,759,870 438,928 438,928 2.3 2.3 3.0 3.0 0212071 Technical Services 230,727 201,130 246,944 246,944 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.0 0212080 Tire Shop 695,709 532,005 238,630 233,630 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0219910 *Citywide Parts and Fuel Charges 0 0 3,732,038 3J32,038 0_0 0_0 0_0 0.0 TOTAL $12,075,950 $11,277,049 $11.972,139 $12,382,479 153.0 153.0 148.0 148.0 * = The Citywide Parts and Fuel Charges section was created in FY1999-00. Thus, funds that had previously been budgeted for fuel and parts in the division's other sections were allocated to this section in FY2000-01. The separation of these costs from those in the division's other sections provides not only a more accurate picture of fuel and parts expenditures, but also of the other expenditures within each of the sections. Ca0A FUND: FUND STATEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND The Information Systems Fund is used to provide for the management of the City's mainframe, network, and telecommunications equipment and services. The Information Technology Solutions Department (IT Solutions) is responsible for coordinating all information technology resources to support the strategic vision of the City of Fort Worth in providing quality service to the community. This is accomplished through such services as administrative support, technical services, software applications development and acquisition, and telecommunications. On October 1, 1994, IT Solutions was transferred from the General Fund to the Information Systems Fund. In the past, costs associated with information technology were dispersed across departments according to formulas based loosely on technology usage. In FY1998-99, the department began operating on a business model in which it bills City departments for services rendered. Thus, departments can make resource allocation decisions based on true -cost analysis. All City departments are thus IT Solutions customers, and the department receives the bulk of its revenue from these customers. The department's expenditures include personnel costs, operating supplies, contractual/consulting services, and such capital equipment as computers and other hardware and software. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00.01 BUDGET R�23 INFORMATION SYSTEMSiFUN� BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 REVENUES:. Computing Services $7840,983 Telephone Services 2811,619 Radio Services ., .' 1626,01.4 External Gustamer Revenue 478,618 Miscellaneous Revenue'` fi1,000 TOTAL REVENUES $12;718,234 'EXPENDITURES: Personal Services $6,880,31;6 Supplies 278,431 Contractual Services 5312.106 TOTAL` RECURRING EXPENDITURE$ $12,47. . Capital Outlay . $33 800 TOTAL EXPENDITEJRES $12,504,653 .. ... .. '-CITOF FORTWORTHOOA01BUDGET2Y Z&V COMPARISON OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND EXPENDITURES Administration Geographic Information Systems Customer Support Center Technical Services Contract Maintenance Development Telecommunications Systems Administration Radio Systems Telephone Systems New Administrative Center; TOTAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000.01 $1,210,994 $1.921,352 $0 $0 $0 504,192 1,061,650 0 0 0 0 346,274 0 0 0 1,987,708 1,877,372 0 0 0 521,654 1,277,188 0 0 0 1,765,023 1,672,145 0 0 0 0 225,784 0 0 0 1,242,807 1,082,067 0 0 0 2,442,381 2,398,387 0 0 0 0 0 10,908.318 12.204.000 12 504 653 $9,674,759 $11,862,219 $10,908,318 $12,204,000 $12,504,653 Expenditures were consolidated into a single division to facilitate a reorganization of the department. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET J I -21 COMPARISON OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Contribution from General Fund $6,791,984 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contribution from Temporary Labor Fund 1,148 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Engineering 182,687 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Golf Fund 20,175 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Airports Fund 56,494 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Water/Sewer 1,147,468 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Municipal Parking Facilities 2,447 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Office Services Fund 4,897 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Equipment Services Fund 202,522 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Solid Waste Fund 41,874 0 0 0 0 Contribution from Insurance Fund 674 0 0 0 0 Coin Phone Commission 33,775 23,718 22,000 22,000 22,000 Contribution from MedStar 9,623 3,207 0 0 0 Antenna Lease 4,151 50,171 22,300 22,300 24,000 Computing Services 0 5,662,717 6,618,967 7.118,967 7,840,983 Telephone Services 0 2,213,222 2,481,221 2,881,221 2,811,619 Radio Services 0 1,109,197 1,076,946 1,376,946 1,526,014 GIS Services 0 953,163 88,560 88,560 0 Year2000 Services 0 1,041,138 249,500 249,500 0 Network Implementation Services (NIP) 0 128,226 0 0 0 External Customers Revenue 0 322,672 380,128 380,128 478,618 Special Projects Revenue 0 1,200 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue 578,254 83,836 15,000 15,000 15,000 TOTAL $9.078,173 $11,592,467 $10,954,622 $12,154,622 $12,718,234 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-29 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER F INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND P168/0041000:0047000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Information Technology Solutions Department is organized into the following groups: Administration, Operations, Finance, and Customer Service. IT Solutions Administration provides overall department direction as well as information technology planning and coordination of information technology security policy and procedures for all City departments. The Operations Group provides technical management and development services for mainframe computer operations and related software applications, telephone systems, wireless systems, and network infrastructure and related software applications. The Finance Group is responsible for all business -administrative functions, including IT Solutions billing and rate structures, financial and budget management, procurement of information technology equipment and services for all City departments, and contract administration. The Customer Service Group serves as IT Solutions' primary point of contact for customers and is responsible for coordination of customer accounts, management of the Customer Support Center as well as maintenance, support and replacement of all desktop computers and IT training coordination. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999.00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $5,040,962 $5,700,172 $6,516,638 $6,880,316 Supplies 312,619 271,311 278,431 278,431 Contractual Services 6,337,020 4,894,835 5,312,106 5,312,106 Capital Outlay 171,618 42,000 33,800 33,800 Total Allocations $11,862,219 $10,908,318 $12,140,975 $12,504,653 Authorized Positions 107.0 111.0 111.0 111.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-30 INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND -111.0 A. P. I FINANCE • Billing and rate administration • Technology procurement • Contract administration Million $ 15--,, 1 13.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources ADMINISTRATION • Overall technology planning • Technology security 4.0 A. P. OPERATIONS • Systems operations • Wireless • Telephone • Network support • Mainframe software support • Distributed applications technologies V i F 1 1 E 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 i3 Expenditures I 79.0 A. P. I CUSTOMER SERVICE • Customer support center • Account manager • Desktop support 15.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 El Positions I R-31 DEPARTMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS FUND FUNDICENTER P 168/0041000: 0047000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $10,908,318 A.P. 111.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $12,504,653 A.P. 111.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $69,151 for the salary and related expenses of adding a Senior Technical Support Analyst for Internet and Intranet applications. B) The adopted budget decreases by ($45,329) for an information Systems Coordinator position that is being moved to the City Manager's Office. The position is assigned to coordinate development of the City's web page, which is better coordinated by the Public Information Office. C) The adopted budget increases by $719,509 due to actual and projected salary increases. D) The adopted budget increases by $417,886 for phone costs, based on usage throughout the City. E) The adopted budget increases by $296,186 for lease of servers and equipment to support the City's institutional fiber network. F) The adopted budget increases by $161,000 for costs associated with a bonus plan implemented by the department to help recruit and retain employees with high-tech skills. G) The adopted budget increases by $132,000 for service desk software so that the department can provide enhanced service quality to customer departments. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET CITY OF. FORT.WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS FUND P168 INFORMATION SYSTEMS Center Center Description 0041000 Administration 0041010 Geographic Information Systems 0041020 Customer Support Center 0042000 Technical Services 0042010 Contract Maintenance 0043000 Development 0046000 Telecommunications Systems Administration 0046001 Radio Systems 0046002 Telephone Systems 0047000 New Administrative Center' DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,921,352 $0 $0 $0 1,061,650 0 0 0 346,274 0 0 0 1,877,372 0 0 0 1,277,188 0 0 0 1,672,145 0 0 0 225,784 0 0 0 1,082,067 0 0 0 2,398,387 0 0 0 0 10,908,318 12,140,975 12.504,653 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0_0 111.0 111.0 111.0 TOTAL $11,862,219 $10,908,318 $12,140,975 $12,504,653 107.0 111.0 111.0 111.0 Expenditures were consolidated into a single division to facilitate a reorganization of the department. R-37 FUND: FUND STATEMENT ENGINEERING The Engineering' Fund is an Internal Service Fund of the City of Fort Worth that provides comprehensive engineering design, project management, surveying, quality control testing, and construction inspection for water, street, storm drain, sidewalk, and other infrastructure improvements. The Engineering Fund derives 80 percent of its revenue from Capital Improvements Project funds from the Transportation and Public Works Department and the Water Department. The Department of Engineering operates on an internal service fund philosophy that focuses on the following: 1) operations driven by the balance of customer needs and revenue; 2) a staffing level driven by workload and customer needs; 3) the study and use of innovative private sector business concepts; 4) the combination of public and private resource opportunities; and 5) the provision of competitive and timely services. The Department of Engineering consists of five divisions, which were created to conduct operations in a manner similar to that of a successful consulting engineering firm. These five divisions perform six essential functions: Engineering Services consists of two sections. The In -House Design section prepares plans and specifications for the City's water, sewer, storm drain and street projects with compressed construction schedules. The Mapping Section provides the following services: FEMA floodplain administration and documentation; preparation of as -built plans for all infrastructure projects, including new developments; preparation and updating of the City's GIS maps for water and sewer, streets, and storm drains; and maintenance of permanent records for all City infrastructure and facilities. Consultant Services develops and negotiates consultant contracts, and provides project management services, which include the review and approval of consultant plans and specifications for City projects. Real Property Services is responsible for obtaining all necessary easements and rights -of -way for city projects, as well as management of the sale and lease of property on behalf of the City; management and sale of City -owned Lake Worth property and leases; and management of the surplus property program. Construction Services provides design and construction, laboratory testing of construction materials, and construction inspection services for all projects to insure compliance with approved plans, specifications, and contract documents. Support Services is responsible for overall departmental administrative operations, contract administration, and coordination of administrative and fiscal activities among all divisions. Survey Services provides preliminary survey, construction staking, easement description, and real property surveys for platting. In accordance with the City's Financial Management Policy Statements (FMPS), which states that "To assure fiscal stability and the effective and efficient delivery of services... and careful administration of the expenditure of available resources" (FMPS, ch. 11), the Department implements the Global Positioning Satellite Survey System for a faster and more accurate survey data collection system and savings in survey labor cost. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET . .. R=39 ENGINEERING FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000. 1 . . . REVENUES: General Fund (Real Proper#y ,Services) $100,000 Transfer from Lake Worth Trust k Fund " . ` 204,785 '. Transpar#ation and Public Works Geherai 1=und Prograrris 279,634 Aviation Fund Capital Projec#s 102,393 Transportation and Public Works Capital Protects ; 2,641,728 Water Capital Projects 1,863,100 Sewer Capital Projects 3.130,946 Receipts from other funds 102,393 Transfer from Water and Sewer Fund 154,13 Parks and Community ,Services Department 151,5;41 Contract'Street<Reventie 480,767 Miscellaneous Revenue 69 500 TOTAL REVENUES $9,261,4.00 . EXPEN©�TI�RES: Personal. services $8,111, 1 68 Supplies 197,8Q5 Contractual. Services 794, 542 TO.1'AL RECURRING EXPENSES $9,103,515 Capital Outlay157,885 TOTAL EKPENDIT.URES .: .. .. $9,261,400 CITY OF FORT WORTH.2000-01 SUDGET R-41 COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Engineering Services $7.530.273 $8.072.759 $8.395.453 $8.304.568 $9.261,400 TOTAL $7,530,273 $8,072,759 $8,395,453 $8,304,568 $9,261,400 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-43 COMPARISON OF ENGINEERING FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 General Fund (Real Property Services) $138,057 $92,714 $175,000 $107.876 $100,000 Transfer from Water and Wastewater Fund 84,000 150 0 0 154,613 Transfer from Lake Worth Trust Fund 175,640 168,828 310,000 169,247 204,785 Parks & Community Services 0 0 0 0 151,541 TPW General Fund Programs 232,266 209.623 200,463 229,902 279,634 Environmental Management General Fund Programs 0 4,560 0 6,684 0 Aviation Capital Projects 107,419 91,369 150,000 93,474 102,393 TPW Capital Projects 2,134,059 2,239,588 2,638,580 2,548,175 2,641,728 Water Capital Projects 1,693,482 1,618,357 1,628,766 1,638,162 1,863,100 Wastewater Capital Projects 2,257,277 2,895,609 2,472,199 2,669,432 3,130,946 Receipts from other funds 172,851 160,499 250,000 206,373 102,393 Contract Street Reimbursements 300,241 434,084 471,797 469,376 460,767 Miscellaneous Revenues 3,331 35,836 74,923 48,371 69,500 Transfer from Retained Earnings 0 0 25,000 0 0 TOTAL $7,298,623 $7,951,217 $8,396,728 $8,187,072 $9,261,400 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER ENGINEERING FUND P119/0301000:0305010 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Engineering Department is responsible for providing engineering design, project management, survey, quality control testing and construction inspection services for all water, storm drain, sidewalk, and other infrastructure improvements. The Support Services Division is responsible for overall departmental operations and coordination of administrative and fiscal activities among all divisions. Engineering's Construction Services Division provides design, construction, laboratory testing, and construction inspection services for all projects to ensure compliance with approved plans, specifications and contract documents. The department's Consultant Services Division negotiates consultant contracts and reviews consultant plans and specifications for City projects. The Real Property Section is responsible for the purchase and sale or lease of real property on behalf of all City departments. It also manages Lake Worth properties and the associated trust fund. The Engineering Services Division consists of the In -House Design and Mapping Sections. The In -House Design Section prepares plans and specifications for construction of City water, sewer, storm drain and street facilities by either City crews or private contractors. The Mapping Section is responsible for mapping water, sewer and other City facilities on City adopted base maps. The Survey Division provides preliminary surveys, construction staking, easement description and real property surveys for platting. The Engineering Department is funded from Water, Sewer and Transportation and Public Works capital improvement bond funds, the General Fund and active bond funds from the Department of Aviation. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adapted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $6,934,590 $7,397,578 $7,898,722 $8,111,168 Supplies 200,502 167,220 197,805 197,805 Contractual Services 838,113 720,255 794,542 794,642 Capital Outlay 99,554 110,400 157,885 157,885 Total Allocations $8,072,759 $8,395,453 $9,048,954 $9,261,400 Authorized Positions 161.00 160.60 156.75 156.75 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-46 ENGINEERING FUND - 156.75 A. P. ADMINISTRATION • Coordination of administrative/clerical functions • Project status monitoring • Budget preparation • Real Property administration 23.75 A. P. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT I ENGINEERING SERVICES SURVEYING SERVICES DIVISION SERVICES DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION • Materials testing a Development of • Surveying • Inspection • In-house review of plans/specifications plans for developer • In-house design for 26.0 A. P. 60.0 A. P. project maintenance/repair of streets, . Development of water/wastewater , professional services Infrastructure improvements contract • Mapping system 13.0 A. P. 34.0 A. P. Million $ in..,-' .BUDGET Changes in Resources 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 El Expenditures I 1 1 1 r---- L-1 1 LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND j See Page 5-65 1 Yrr rr__� 1 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 0 positions I R-47 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER ENGINEERING P119/0301000:0305010 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $8,395,453 A.P. 160.60 2000-01 ADOPTED: $9,261,400 A.P. 156.75 A) The adopted budget decreases by ($203,297) because of the deletion of four authorized positions and two temporary (S01) positions due to the implementation of Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) Survey System technology in the Survey Division. B) The adopted budget increases by $755,699 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $104,305 for purchase of Global Positioning Satellite Survey System equipment for the Survey Division. D) The adopted budget increases by $76,885 for drafting software and scanning equipment to archive numerous paper documents, as well as a trailer for transporting core samples in the Lab Division. E) The adopted budget increases by $64,461 for contributions to retirement due to salary increases. F) The adopted budget increases by $33,532 for group health charges due to a projected rate increase in FY2000-01. G) The adopted budget decreases by ($30,037) for workers' compensation due to the planned use of Workers' Compensation fund balance. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET appro DEPARTMENTAL MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED:'' 1998-99' 1999-00 2000 0I.. DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING FUND PI19 ENGINEERING FUND Center Center Description Administration 0301000 Engineering Administration Sub -Total Construction Services 0302010 Inspection Survey 0302020 Construction Survey 0302030 Construction Laboratory Sub -Total Consultant Services 0303010 Consultant Services Sub -Total Enaineedna Services 0304010 Mapping 0304020 In -House Design Sub -Total Survey 0305010 Survey TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $1,810,898 $1,774,139 $1,617.382 $1,829.828 23.0 22.6 23.75 23.75 $1,810,898 $1,774,139 $1,617.382 $1,829,828 23.0 22.6 23.75 23.75 $2,892,715 $2,921,333 $3,181,613 $3,181,613 46.0 46.0 51.0 51.0 1,067,149 1,140,992 0 0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 305,732 331,685 390,919 390,919 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 $4,265,596 $4,394,010 $3,572,532 $3,572,532 90.0 90.0 60.0 60.0 $666.178 $733.738 $855,628 $855.628 11.0 11.0 13.0 13.0 $666,178 $733,738 $855,628 $855,628 11.0 11.0 13.0 13.0 $605,185 $646,963 $803,326 $803,326 18.0 18.0 17.0 17.0 724,902 846,603 978,994 978,994 19.0 19.0 17.0 17.0 $1,330,087 $1,493,566 $1,782,320 $1,782,320 37.0 37.0 34.0 34.0 N/A NIA $1221.092 $1,221,092 N/A N/A 26.0 26.0 $1,221,092 $1,221,092 $8,072,759 $8,395,453 $9,048,954 $9,261,400 161.0 160.6 156.75 156.75 Cii R-53 FUND: FUND STATEMENT OFFICE SERVICES The Office Services Fund is an Internal Service Fund that consists of three divisions: the Print Shop, Graphics, and the Mailroom. Prior to 1990, these three divisions operated as three independent City shops. To increase efficiency and cost- effectiveness, the Print Shop and Graphics were merged in 1990, and the Mailroom was added in 1992. Currently, the Office Services Fund is the City's in-house reprographics division managed under a single coordinator, offering a "one -stop shop" for City departments. The Print Shop accommodates small -to -medium printing jobs that are needed quickly. Most of the jobs completed by the print shop involve City forms, letterhead, envelopes, newsletters, and brochures for each department. The Print Shop also offers bindery services, makes ID cards for City employees, provides high-speed copying, makes blue -line reproductions, and does some spot -color work. However, all four-color process work is contracted to outside firms. In addition, the Print Shop manages the City's walk-up copiers, administers contracts with copier vendors, and orders paper for copiers. Walk-up copiers are available throughout City Hall and other City facilities. Graphics provides a full line of services, including desktop publishing, logo creation, displays, posters, photography, camera-ready art, and audio-visual checkout. When four-color work is created for outside printing, the artist writes print specifications for the bid, delivers the job on disk or as camera-ready art, and acts as a liaison between the printer and departmental users. The receipt and distribution of all outgoing and incoming mail is the responsibility of the Mailroom. The Mailroom employees deliver and pickup mail at remote City facilities and operate the equipment which folds bills and places them, along with return envelopes, newsletters, and any other inserts, into envelopes that are then processed and mailed. Studies have been conducted to determine if it would be more cost-effective and efficient for the City to delete the in-house reprographics department and send all work to outside vendors. These studies concluded that the in-house operation is more cost- effective and efficient because Office Services prices are competitive or below market rates, and the turnaround time is shorter. In addition, the in-house shop employees recognize the sensitivity of City jobs, such as the Mayor and Council Communications and the Proposed and Adopted Budgets. These documents contain information that should be confidential until printed and distributed to the City Council. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-55 OFFICE SERVICES FUND BUDGET SUMMARY .. .. .. = , FISCAL YEAR . 20.00-09 REVENUES: . . Errands $1,500 1=ax Machine Charges 12fl Interest Earned -Office Services 8,3f10 Invoice Entry ... 18,400 Kodak Printing 191,000 Labor - Inter -Departmental Biking ' 281,700 Mail acid Messenger 27,40fl Miscellaneous Revenue 64,500 Office Copy Charges 727,000 Postage 114,00fl Printing 14,000 Rush -Departmental Billing 1,500 Sale of Business Cards 23,700 Supplies inter-©epartmental Billing 289,670 Photography 18,000 Translation services 6,fli)0 Use of Reserves 240 83{3 TOTAL REVENUES $2027,620 EXPENDITURES; Personal Services $723,407 Supplies 286,602 Contractual Services 8921 .. .. TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES .,. $1902,420 Capital :Outlay' 925 20Q TOTAL.EXPENDITURES $2;027,620,. * Total expenditures include a transfer to the General Fund'that is offset by the use of fund reserves. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET' R-57 COMPARISON OF OFFICE SERVICES FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Print Shop $1,112,546 $1,255,949 $1,228,287 $1,204,329 $1,271.697 Graphics 141,911 201,706 209,053 255,217 224,309 Mall Room 388,008 470,452 440,301 405,169 531,614 TOTAL $1,642,465 $1,928,107 $1,877,641 $1,864,715 $2,027,620 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-59 COMPARISON OF OFFICE SERVICES FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Gain/Loss on Assets ($87,473) ($25,972) $0 $0 $0 Customer Alteration 5 67 0 175 0 Errands 618 1,093 500 1,595 1,500 Fax Machine Charges 219 71 33 125 120 Interest Earned - Office Services 43,016 46,759 30,000 7,262 8,300 Invoice Entry 20,267 21,262 20,500 19,099 18,400 Kodak Printing 171,345 216,832 180,000 194,715 191,000 Labor- Inter -Departmental Billing 279,141 268,762 252,000 290,058 281,700 Mail and Messenger 28,665 28,120 26,000 27,495 27,400 Miscellaneous Revenue 62,177 63,675 59,630 67,633 64,500 Office Copy Charges 790,975 790,744 690,000 708,551 727,000 Postage 241,883 108,589 112,000 130,910 114,000 Printing 14,884 19,556 14,000 23,796 14,000 Rush - Inter -Departmental Billing 1,507 1,752 2,000 1,457 1,500 Sale of Business Cards 23,394 12,453 20,000 26,095 23,700 Supplies - Inter -Departmental Billing 250,664 285,481 241,000 307,168 289,670 Translation Services 0 0 6,000 0 6,000 Photography 0 0 18,000 0 18,000 Unrealized Gain 15,029 0 0 0 0 Sub Total 1,856,316 1,839,244 1,671,663 1,806,134 1,786,790 Use of Reserves 0 0 205,978 205,978 240,830 TOTAL $1,856,316 $1,839,244 $1,877,641 $2,012,112 $2,027,620 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-61 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER NON -DEPARTMENTAL - OFFICE SERVICES FUND P160/0901310:0901330 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: Office Services Fund consists of three divisions: the Print Shop, Graphics and the Mailroom. The Print Shop is responsible for typesetting, printing, binding, blueline production, and walk-up copier service, The Graphics Division provides centralized graphic design and printing for all City departments. This division prepares a variety of illustrative materials such as maps, sketches, charts, posters, covers, exhibits, graphs, diagrams, and photographic. illustrations. The Mailroom Division provides centralized mail service and facsimile service for City departments. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $641,698 $655,505 $719,537 $723,407 Supplies 283,741 282,100 286,600 286,602 Contractual Services 860,418 890,036 892,411 892,411 Capital Outlay 142,250 50,000 125,200 125,200 Total Allocations $1,928,107 $1,877,641 $2,023,750 $2,027,620 Authorized Positions 18.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R-62 Million $ 2.5--' OFFICE SERVICES FUND -19.0 A. P. I PRINT SHOP • Printing/Binding . Blueline production • Walk-up copiers • Business Cards 9,o A. P. 1 NON -DEPARTMENTAL 1 1 REPROGRAPHICS 1 ------------------ BUDGET Changes in Resources • Graphics design • Desktop publishin • Photography • Displays I GRAPHICS MAILROOM • Folding/inserting g • Mail and messenger service • Facsimile service • Interoffice Mail Service 4.0 A. P. 6.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Ja Positions 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 10 Expenditures I v SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES R-63 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER NON -DEPARTMENTAL - OFFICE SERVICES P160/0901310.0901330 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $1,877,641 A.P. 19.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $2,027,620 A.P. 19.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $75,200 in capital outlays for the purchase of a four -station inserter for the water bills, a scanner and MAC hard drive, and also for the replacement of the current offset printing press. B) The adopted budget increases by $52,837 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET R-64 DEPARTMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES DEPARTMENT: NON -DEPARTMENTAL - REPROGRAPHICS DEPARTMENT PURPOSE To provide convenient, cost-effective art design, printing, mail preparation and walk-up copier service for all City departments. 2000-01 DEPARTMENTAL OBJECTIVES To continue upgrading equipment to improve the services provided without significantly increasing the cost to the City or charges to user departments. To reduce the per copy cost to departments for Reporgraphics' high-speed copier services from $0.05 to $0.045. To reduce user department walk-up costs from $0.045 to $0.04 per copy. DEPARTMENTAL MEASURES Percentage of equipment upgraded Percentage of reduction in high-speed copier charges ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 9% 9% 9% 0 11% 11% Savings to departments due to reduction in walk-up copier costs 0 $56,881 CITY OF FORT (NORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET $84,864 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER DEPARTMENT ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS NON -DEPARTMENTAL FUND Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted P160 OFFICE SERVICES FUND Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Center Center Description 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0901310 Print Shop $1,255,949 $1,228,287 $1,267,825 $1,271,697 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0901320 Graphics 201,706 209,053 224,309 224,309 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0901330 Mail Room 470,452 440,301 531,614 531,614 6_0 6_0 6_0 6_0 TOTAL $1,928,107 $1,877,641 $2,023,748 $2,027,620 18.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 cn FUND: FUND STATEMENT TEMPORARY LABOR The Temporary Labor Fund is a City of Fort Worth Internal Service Fund. The Fund was established to provide a centralized temporary employee source for all City departments. In 1987, a study was conducted regarding contracting the City's temporary labor services to an entity outside the City. However, it was found to be more cost-effective for the City to provide the service in-house. In fact, it was estimated that the City's provision of such services could potentially save the City 38 to 40 percent. Thus, the Temporary Labor Fund was established in October of 1987. The Human Resources Department (HR) manages the Temporary Labor Fund, which is responsible for recruiting and referring qualified applicants to fill City departments' temporary staffing needs, The service allows departments to operate at maximum efficiency during peak workload periods, vacation periods, extended leaves of absence and other situations. Human Resources is responsible for performing the in-house prescreening and testing of all potential Temporary Labor pool employees. Thus, the department is able to monitor temporaries to ensure that they meet the test score, experience, typing, and education requirements of the City's regular/permanent positions. Departments utilizing Temporary Labor's services are billed by the Fund for the temporary employee's salary and all associated administrative costs. The Fund's expenditures include personal services, supplies, and contractual services. There are approximately 70 to 80 temporary employees working in a variety of City departments during any given pay period. The duration of a temporary assignment ranges from one day to three months. With Budget Office approval, extensions beyond a three-month period may be granted on an as -needed basis. R-67 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET R=69 ` ,. TEMPORARY LABDR FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2QQ0-01 '' REVENUES: Labor Charges $9.1 i3.70i3. ..TOTAL REVENUES $9.18,700 ?E�I�ryDITuRI=s: Personal Services $882,477 ` Supplies ', ', 200' �, Contractual.Services 92,262' :.. z ; ,_ ':TOTAL EXPENDITURES. ` $894,939, CITY OF FORT WORTH �OCIn-tit. BU©GET R-71 COMPARISON OF TEMPORARY LABOR FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Temporary Labor Fund $1,038,787 $1,008,442 $985.500 $890.440 $894.939 TOTAL $1,038,787 $1,008,442 $985,500 $890,440 $894,939 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET Interest on Investment Labor Charges Use of Retained Earnings We] L1I COMPARISON OF TEMPORARY LABOR FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 $115 $92 $0 $0 $0 1,021,659 1,024,926 988,015 900,588 918,700 20,000 0 0 0 0 $1,041,774 $1,025,018 $988,015 $900,588 $918,700 R-73 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER HUMAN RESOURCES - TEMPORARY LABOR P117/0140000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Temporary Labor Department provides temporary clerical employees to meet the City's short-term labor needs. The department maintains a top-quality temporary labor pool that meets all City departmental requests. The Temporary Labor Department ensures quality service by performing in-house pre-screening and testing of all applicants for the temrporary positions. The department's staff functions as a liaison between City departments and the temporary labor pool, scheduling and coordinating the temporary employees to fill City departments' temporary labor requests in the most efficient and effective manner possible. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Adopted Budget 2000-01 Personal Services $999,335 $963,925 $878,485 Supplies 555 350 200 Contractual Services 8,552 21,225 12,262 Capital outlay 0 0 0 Total Allocations $1,008,442 $985,500 $890,947 Authorized Positions 2.0 2.0 2.0 $882,477 200 12,262 0 $894,939 2.0 Ial"WAR CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET KAM; , e is . ".-. r �''ra HUMAN RESOURCES � B I TEMPORARY LA..... BOR ® Recruitment of qualified temporary labor pool applicants Referral of qualified temporary employees to departments . Temporary labor testing ® Temporary labor training 2.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 2.0- 1 0.0 1997 1998 1999 1 Cl Positions 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Expenditures 2000 2001 v �,%Je ntt tuc Ni vgIuieiy:q:i eeaJ. ei!IJWI eae y lGty%Je ace vtalc LU GII'Vl ly NAUfJ-P[ati 1011 L0. To offer temporary Tabor services at a cost below that charged by outsEde agencies FUND STATEMENT FUND: INSURANCE The Risk Management department serves as a focal point in coordinating loss identification, reduction and prevention programs; administers the City's Unemployment Compensation Program; and oversees the group medical benefits program for active and retired employees. The department's goal is carried out through several programs that are administered through designated operating funds. Program revenue primarily comes from transfer payments from other City departments. The Group Health Insurance fund also derives revenue from contributions of both current and retired employees. The revenue is budgeted based on expected cash expenditures required to meet current expenses and the current year payments toward prior incurred expenses. The following are the designated operating funds implemented to meet the department's goal Workers' Compensation: This is a self -insured program with single incident excess insurance maintained with a $500,000 self insured retention (SIR) and Employer's Liability insurance at a $1,000,000 limit. A third party administrator handles claims. Unemployment Compensation: The City is a reimbursing agency for Unemployment Compensation. The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) sends quarterly reports to the City concerning claims that are paid on behalf of the City to eligible former employees. The City's Risk Management personnel review all claims and file reports to TWC accordingly. Group Health Insurance: The City contracts with a health maintenance organization and health insurance company to provide group health insurance coverage for eligible City employees and retirees, plus their eligible spouses and/or dependents. A self -funded plan of indemnity -type benefits is also available to qualified participants. The self -funded plan is reinsured with excess coverage as follows: $60,000 specific stop loss insurance on an "all cause" basis, per person per plan year; and, $1,000,000 annual aggregate stop loss insurance. In addition to group health insurance, the City provides a basic $10,000 life insurance policy on each eligible full-time permanent employee at no cost to the employee. An additional $10,000 for accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) is also provided. A $3,000 death benefit is provided for each eligible retiree from the Retired Employees Group Death Benefit Fund. Property and Casualty Insurance: This program combines commercial and self insurance to cover standard risks associated with property coverage on City structures, boilers and machinery, electronic data processing equipment, crime (employee dishonesty plus theft, disappearance and destruction, and faithful performance coverage), public official bonds, helicopter liability, excess airport liability and liquor liability. Third party liability claims against the City and subrogation efforts by the City are handled internally by licensed claim adjusters. The liability insurance program is largely self -funded for liability claims and lawsuits, settlements and expenses. S-1 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE FUND 74 • Commercial Insurance . Self Insurance • Claims and litigation expenses • Subrogation S-3 r-_-_-- 1 R15K �IIANAGEMENT 1 1 1 WORKERS COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE FUND 85 w,. UNEMPLOYMENT FUND 73 COMPENSATION FUND 86 • Employees' insurance • Workers' compensation .Retirees' insurance • Reimbursement to Texas benefits • Claims administration fees ® Life insurance Employment Commission " ; xT a 33 NO x go mill, . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . ..... .. .. . .. . . ... . S5 PRUPERi'Y AND CASUALTY !N$URANCE FUMD BUDGET SUMMARY iFISCAL YEAR . zoc�o-o REVENUES AND.OTHER FINANCING SOURCIiwS: City Fund Contributions General Fund $3,895,3fi0 Illlater and Sewer Funds 623,208 Snlid Waste Fund 22,428 Airports Fund 134;648 Cable Communications Fund 1g,7g6 Equipment Services ;Fund 17,598 Parking Facilities Fund 24690 Golf Fund 11,452 Engineering Services Fund `' 10,308 information Sy$tems?Fund 3,598 1=nviranmenta! Management 7gg TOTAL CITY CONTRIBUTIONS $4,762,844 .._ Contributions from Other Agencies: HUL? Financed HOPE::and Urban Homesteading Progra.rms (for Liability',Self Insurance) 300 TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS FROAII OTHER AGENCIES $3,2d0 Use of Fund Balance 300.800 TOTAL REVENUES AND. OTHER FINANCING SOURCES ` $5,0F6,844 EXQENDITUFtES: Expenses Lawsuit Payments a............. $3,000,000 Claims and Claims Expense v20,000 Self -Insurance 246,788 Commercial Insurance 936,056 ...... .n..........d Legal Opinians antl Related Services 329,0(i0 Property Appraisal Fees 35,000 TOTAi. EXPENDITURES $ 066,844 . . . ... ... .... . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . ... ... . . . . . . . . . ClTY'OF FONT WQR"H 2O00-07 BUDGET S-7 COMPARISON OF PROPERTY AND CASUALTY FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Lawsuit Payments and Expenses $4,286,708 $2,717,349 $3,125,000 $1,840,717 $3,000,000 Claims and Related Expenses 305,007 362,350 572,500 948,444 520,000 Self -Insurance 4,967 38,564 460,000 460,000 246,788 Commercial Insurance 658,063 702,865 716,970 993,966 936,056 Legal Opinions and Related Services 0 0 354,000 352,275 329,000 Property Appraisal Fees 0 0 34,000 34,000 35,000 TOTAL $5,254,745 $3,821,128 $5,262,470 $4,629,402 $5,066,844 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-9 COMPARISON OF PROPERTY AND CASUALTY FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 City Fund Contributions General Fund $3,449,035 $3,496,083 $3,540,815 $3,545,388 $3,895,360 Water and Sewer Fund 895,601 531,578 735,796 895,796 623,208 Solid Waste Fund 10,221 72,408 38,838 38,840 22,428 Airports Fund 92,223 87,248 105,126 105,127 134,648 Cable Communications Fund 0 9,297 0 8,392 18,786 Equipment Services Fund 54,112 16,203 15,733 15,735 17,598 Parking Facilities Fund 11,476 21,491 21,267 21,267 24,690 Golf Fund 11,358 10,095 9,937 11,024 11,452 Engineering Services Fund 5,000 5,000 9,027 8,852 10,308 Information Systems Fund 0 0 9,479 0 3,598 Environmental Management Fund 0 1,401 662 662 769 Other Sources 921,337 1,056,838 9,841 493,870 3,200 Use of Fund Balance 0 0 765,949 0 300.800 TOTALS $5,450,363 $5,307,642 $5,262,470 $5,144,953 $5,066,844 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-11 Y WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 200a-U1 REVENUES'. City Fund Contributions General Fund ` $4,165,810 INa#er and Sewer Fund T,48.1,936 `. Came Control and Prevention District Fund 729 Equipment Services 1=und 330,519 Salid 1Naste Fund 159,790 Engineering Fund 156,363 Galf Fund .. 82,557 Airports: Fund 49,8T2 `. Office Services Fund ': 875 Grants Fund 231,582 T. emporary 1_alor Fund 47,4Q4 . information Systems `Fund 14�878 nvironmental'Management Fund 729 Cable Communications Fund 72g Culture &Tourism 87g Parking Facilities Fund 158 City Store 365 TOTAL. REVENUE$ $6,725,T11 OTHER `FfNANCING SOURCES: Use of Retained Earnings $9.379.819 TOTAL REVENUES AND'OTHI=R FINANCING SOURCES $10,104,930 EXPENDJTtESAND OTHER USES: Workers' Compensation and Related Costs $9,80493Q S-13 COMPARISON OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND EXPENDITURES Workers' Compensation and Related Costs Excess Catastrophic Insurance ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 $6,291,563 $7,840,701 $8,466,150 $9,258,882 $9,804,930 59,887 52,820 300.000 65,167 300.000 TOTAL $6,351,450 $7,893,521 $8,766,150 $9,324,049 $10,104,930 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-15 COMPARISON OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL_ BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999.00 1999-00 2000-01 City Fund Contributions General Fund $3,123,301 $4,398,698 $5,984,100 $5,700,124 $4,165,810 Water and Sewer Fund 1,151,000 1,230,240 1,766,600 1,766,610 1,481,936 Crime Control and Prevention District 1,000 999 1,000 1,000 729 Equipment Services Fund 47,200 186,800 394,050 394,050 330,519 Solid Waste Fund 85,300 49,600 190,500 190,500 159,790 Engineering Services Fund 112,000 243,000 186,400 242,896 156,363 Golf Fund 29,100 22,300 98,450 98,450 82,557 Airports Fund 28,800 20,300 64,750 64,751 49,812 Office Services Fund 1,882 1,000 1,000 1,000 875 Grants Fund 269,803 255,781 0 192,148 231,582 Temporary Labor Fund 0 0 56,500 0 47,404 Information Systems Fund 492 27,399 17,750 17,752 14,878 Environmental Management Fund 0 500 1,000 1,000 0 Retirement Fund 0 0 1,000 0 729 Cable Communications Fund 1,000 500 1,000 0 729 Culture and Tourism Fund 0 0 1,000 0 875 Parking Facilities Fund 500 500 250 187 158 City Store 0 0 500 0 365 Other Sources 500 11,217 300 1,500 0 Use of Fund Balance 1.499,572 1,444.687 0 652,081 3.379.819 TOTAL $6,351,450 $7,893,521 $8,766,150 $9,324,049 $10,104,930 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER WORKERS' COMPENSATION FE73/0157310 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL. RESPONSIBILITIES. The Risk Management Department administers the Workers' Compensation Fund. Expenditures are based on actual workers' compensation claims for the previous year and anticipated claims for the upcoming year. Revenue is transferred into the Workers' Compensation Fund from the General Fund, enterprise and internal service funds, and the grants and capital improvement projects funds. Allocations Personal Services Supplies Contractual Services Capital Outlay Total Allocations Authorized Positions i Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999.00 2000-01 2000-01 $0 $0 $0 $0 2,446 0 0 0 7,891,075 8,766,150 10,104,930 10,104,930 0 0 0 0 $7,893,521 $8,766,150 $10,104,930 $10,104,930 0.0 � 0.0 0.0 0.01 S-17 .. . . . . . ... . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. . ..... .. . . S�79 . .; . HEALTH ARI® LIFE INSURANCE: FtNlai U®GET SUNIM�RY . FISCAL YEAR �000�a� . REVENUES P►N® OTHER ER FINANCING SOURCES :Interest Income $75,Q1]Q Contributions for Medical Coverage; Active Employees and Dependents 4,82Q,426 Retirees and Dependents ' 2,211,366 Ilse of Retained Earnings p Sub -Total- Other Revenues $7106;792 Active Employee ' Retiree Reaurr�r�en�s Reuiremen#s Total City Fund Contributions General Fund.; $10,466,679:' $5,330,708 $15797,387 Temporary Labor Hind 5,372 0 5,372 Golf Fund 1,69,279 12524 181,$03 Airports Fund 67,567 31309 98,876 Water and Sewer Funds 2,Q30,681 898574 2929,255 Environmental Management Fund 53,739 . 0 53,739 .. Parking Facilities Fund 1,935 > 2 890 4,825 Office Services Fund 51,053 12528 63,581 Equipment Services Fund 397,672 140892 538,564 Solid Waste ...und 209,525 247 342 456,867 Information Systems;�und 300,716 3131 303,847 Crime Control;& Prevention Drstrrct`Fund 492,ti71 0 492,671 Cable Communications Fund 34 921 0 34,921 Ci#y Stare 3,7901. 0 3,790 Culture &Tourism Fund 21,496 '. 0 21,496 Grants Fund 21,287 0 21,287 Engineering Fund 420.658 59:488 480.146 Slab Total City Fund Contributions . $14,749,041 $6,739,386 $21,488,427 TOTEIL REVENUES $281595,219 EENDITURES./AND OTFIER:USES' Medical Claims and Services- Retirees and Dependents $8708,773 Medical Claims and Services -,Employees and Dependents 19,258,180 Basic Life. Insurance 225,000 Accidental Death Premiums 4p�Opp Group Health avid Life Services .' 2X000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $28,461,953 CITYiOF FORT. WORTH 2p00 01 BUDGET S-21 COMPARISON OF HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE FUND EXPENDITURES Medical Claims & Services Retirees and Dependents Employees and Dependents Basic Life Insurance Accidental Death Premiums Group Health and Life Services ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 1999.00 2000-01 $6,255,641 $6,806,771 $7,091,653 $7,738,577 $8,708,773 16,230,900 17,371,237 18,689,921 18,950,201 19,258,180 165,198 200,256 197,000 203,564 225,000 44,138 32,182 35,000 40,249 40,000 663,390 83,190 201,000 197.163 230.000 TOTAL $22,759,267 $24,493,636 $26,214,574 $27,129,754 $28,461,953 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-23 COMPARISON OF HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE FUND REVENUES Employee Contributions Retiree Contributions Interest Income Unrealized Gain 1 Loss Sub -Total City Fund Contributions General Fund Temporary labor Fund Golf Fund Airports Fund Water and Sewer Fund Environmental Management Fund Municipal Parking Fund Office Services Fund Equipment Services Fund Solid Waste Fund Information Systems Fund Crime Control and Prevention District Cable Communications Fund City Store Culture and Tourism Fund Grants Fund Engineering Services Fund Other Funds Sub -Total Miscellaneous Revenue Use of Fund Balance ACTUAL ACTUAL 1997-98 1998-99 $5,239,074 $5,477,612 1,668,053 1,790,802 389,661 364,083 137,355 (168.942) $7,434,143 $7,463,555 BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1999.00 1999.00 2000-01 $5,738,089 $6,143,801 $4,820,426 2,084,579 1,988,659 2,211,366 75,000 461,150 75,000 0 0 0 $7,897,668 $8,593,610 $7,106,792 $9,710,126 $12,026,584 $13,276,769 $13,266,228 $15,797,387 4,083 4,428 4,809 4,810 5,372 104,044 151,040 163,620 163,615 181,803 128,216 93,899 110,488 110,488 98,876 2,070,246 2,331,298 2,570,511 2,570,566 2,929,255 0 0 48,090 0 53,739 1,946 2,214 4,611 1,804 4,825 50,384 44,524 55,418 52,985 63,581 414,731 453,206 404,235 492,056 538,564 349,507 382,932 492,057 404,236 456,867 271,676 239,234 269,118 269,118 303,847 369,904 424,134 510,837 529,604 492,671 0 0 30,822 0 34,921 0 0 4,098 0 3,790 0 0 16,832 0 21,496 416,819 352,211 18,768 320,549 21,287 295,344 363,218 474,773 474,773 480,146 124.229 142,381 0 172.211 0 $14,311,255 $17,011,303 $18,455,856 $18,833,043 $21,488,427 $163,358 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,511 $18,778 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $22,759,267 $24,493,636 $26,353,524 $27,426,653 $28,595,219 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY S-25 Z DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE FE85/0158510:0158540 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Risk Management Department administers the Health and Life Insurance Fund. Funds for various health insurance benefits - such as health insurance requirements for employees, retirees and their dependents, and life insurance requirements - are budgeted in the Health and Life Insurance Fund. The FY2000-01 adopted budget includes a 16.6% increase in total expenditures. The increase includes three main components: 1) a nine percent increase in the health maintenance organization (HMO) and preferred provider organization (PPO) benefits, 2) a 12.3 percent increase in funds budgeted to finance the City's self -funded plan plus stop loss insurance premiums, and 3) an increase in the total number of active and retired employees covered through the City's plan. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal services $0 $0 $0 $0 Supplies 9,849 3,000 3,000 3,000 Contractual Services 24,483,787 26,211,574 28,458,953 28,458,953 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $24,493,636 $26,214,574 $28,461,953 $28,461,953 Authorized Positions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND FE85 HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE Center Center Description 0158510 Group Health/Life Services 0158520 Employee Insurance 0158540 Retiree Insurance TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $83,190 $201,000 $230,000 $230,000 17,601,856 18,919,921 19,289,371 19,289,371 6.808.590 7.093.653 8.942.582 8.942,582 $24,493,636 $26,214,574 $28,461,953 $28,461,953 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0'0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (A N .. ... .. . . . .. . . .. ... . . . . ... .. S-29 �,,, I HEMP OYMENT COMPENSATION' FUND EU®GET SUMMARY FISCAi! YEAS 2000�01 REVENUES: Gfy Fund Contributions. General Fund $4g,265 V�laterlSewer'Funds ` 9,342 Solid Was#e Fund g73 Municipai Parking Fund3 Airports. Fund 347 Equipment Services;Fund 1,912 Engineering Fund 1,870 Environmental Managemen#;Fund 252 Municipal Golf Fund 803 City S#ore 25 Culture;& Tourism gg Retirement 75 Offrce Services Fund 225 Information Systems Fund 1,340 1 empow.y tabor Fund 27 Cable Communications Fund 163 Sub=Total $65,720 Use of Fund Balance 284:280 TOTAL REVENUES $350,Op0 . E�iP�IDIrURES:' . Reimbursement to Texas Employment Commission $342,500 Administrative Expenses 7,5C10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES' $350,000 r . .. .. ..:. ..,... . CITY OF FORT WORTH 2OQA-01 13U®GET COMPARISON OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FUND EXPENDITURES Reimbursement to Texas Employment Commission Administrative Expenses TOTAL ACTUAL 1997-98 $248,752 6,587 ACTUAL 1998-99 $206,084 0 BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 $317,500 7,500 $320,612 3,512 $342,500 7,500 $255,339 $206,084 $325,000 $324,124 $350,000 S-31 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-33 COMPARISON OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FUND REVENUES ACTUAL_ ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 City Fund Contributions General Fund $185,175 $212,210 $230,195 $230,555 $48,265 Water and Sewer Fund 35,275 42,000 44,620 48,056 9,342 Solid Waste Fund 3,675 4,400 4,650 4,650 973 Municipal Parking Fund 120 120 65 65 13 Airports Fund 1,425 2,600 1,786 1,786 347 Crime Control and Prevention District 0 0 10,595 0 0 Equipment Services Fund 7,475 8,640 9,130 9,130 1,912 Engineering Services Fund 7,250 8,510 9,620 9,620 1,870 Environmental Management Fund 0 1,140 1,205 0 252 Golf Fund 2,400 2,879 3,835 4,255 803 City Store 0 0 130 0 25 Culture and Tourism Fund 0 0 420 0 88 Retirement Fund 0 0 360 0 75 Office Services Fund 875 1,020 1,075 1,075 225 Information Systems Fund 4,850 5,680 6,405 6,407 1,340 Temporary Labor Fund 100 120 130 130 27 Cable Communications Fund 0 0 780 0 163 Grants Fund 13,083 11,539 0 9,296 0 Other Sources 650 2,100 0 2,116 0 Use of Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 284.280 TOTAL $262,353 $302,858 $325,000 $327,141 $350,000 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET ' FUND: S-35 FUND STATEMENT CULTURE AND TOURISM The Culture and Tourism Fund is a special fund of the City of Fort Worth established in 1989 to provide funding for organizations that either enhance tourism or promote, develop and maintain cultural activities in Fort Worth. Currently, these organizations include the Fort Worth Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB), the Arts Council of Fort Worth and Tarrant County, the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth, the Fort Worth Museum of Science and History, Fort Worth Sister Cities International, and the Van Cliburn Foundation. In FY1997-98, the City acquired the Fort Worth Convention Center, expanding the Public Events Department beyond the Will Rogers Memorial Center. Funding has been allocated in the Culture and Tourism Fund for a portion of the operation and maintenance of these facilities. This fund also supports the new Fort Worth Herd, a living history project introduced in FY1998-99 to educate citizens and visitors about the heritage of Fort Worth. The Culture and Tourism Fund is supported solely by the hotel/motel occupancy tax. Contracts with the administering organizations are based upon projected collections for the upcoming fiscal year. The Culture and Tourism Fund experienced dramatic revenue increases until the 1999-00 fiscal year. Past increases were due to increases in the number of hotel rooms as Fort Worth expanded its convention and tourism base. Although this trend is expected to continue in the future, the short-term trend has been for modest to flat revenues. The FY2000-01 budget anticipated no revenue increases above those budgeted for FY1999-00. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET . . .... .. ... . .. .. . . ........ ... .. . _. __ _ __ 5=3T . ....' . CULTURE AND. TOURISM FUND BUDGET SUMMARY }"ISCAL YEAR 2000�0 i REVENUES: . HofellMotel Occupancy Tax $7,919,566 Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax Convention Center* 2,2Uj733 TOTAL REVENUES $,.0292 8, EXPENDITURES:: Personal Services . $367398 Supplies 44956 Contractual Services 7�905946 �,.. TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES $7,518,300 Capital Outlay 40� 266 T.OTAL::EXPENDITURES $7,91.9566 *In FY1997-98, the City began to collect an additional 2 percent tax on hotel room rentals to support expansion and improvements of the Fort Worth Convention Center, which had;' t been acquired from Tarrant County. .:;. .. . CITY OF FORT VIIORTH 2O00 .01'f3U®GEi' .b-39 COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND TOURISM FUND EXPENDITURES WRMC/FWCC Operations & Maintenance FWCC/WRMC Capital Improvements Fort Wort} Herd Convention and Visitors Bureau Special Public Facilities Fund Arts Council Museum of Science and History Modern Art Museum Van Cliburn Foundation* Fort Worth Sister Cities World Affairs Council ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 $0 $781,802 $971,807 $971,807 $971,807 0 0 414,651 414,651 401,266 0 386,968 382,911 382,911 439,366 5,029,666 3,845,556 4,355,761 4,355,761 4,355,761 280,500 429,375 439,680 439,680 400,000 109,270 110,000 112,640 112,640 110,000 469,735 491,396 503,190 503,190 503,190 399,524 427,491 437,751 437,751 437,751 0 25,000 62,600 62,600 62,600 110,827 224,335 212,575 212,575 237,825 0 0 26,000 26,000 0 $6,399,522 $6,721,923 $7,919,566 $7,919,566 $7,919,566 * Funding for Van Cliburn was previously included in the Convention and Visitors' Bureau allocation. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-41 COMPARISON OF CULTURE AND TOURISM FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax $6,523,563 $5,497,156 $7,919,566 $7,674,781 $7,919,566 Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax - Convention Center* 1.440,705 1,568.467 2,262.733 2,192.795 2.262.733 TOTAL $7,964,268 $7,065,623 $10,182,299 $9,867,576 $10,182,299 * Funds accruing for future capital improvements to the Fort Worth Convention Center. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CULTURE AND TOURISM GG04/0240500:0252000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Culture and Tourism Fund currently promotes the cultural and educational interests of residents and visitors through contributions to the Fort Worth Convention Center, the Will Rogers Memorial Center, the Fort Worth Convention and Visitors Bureau, the Arts Council of Fort Worth and Tarrant County, the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth, the Fort Worth Museum of Science and History, the Van Cliburn Foundation, and the Fort Worth Sister Cities. Activities in this department are supported through collection of a hotel/motel occupancy tax. Funding for the Fort Worth Convention and Visitors Bureau includes agreements for promoting the Fort Worth Convention Center, the Equestrian Center, and the Will Rogers Memorial Center. In addition, beginning January 1, 1998, a hotellmotel occupancy tax increase of 2% was approved to support future debt to renovate the newly acquired Fort Worth Convention Center. Allocations Personal Services Supplies Contractual Services Capital Outlay Total Allocations Authorized Positions Actual Adopted Proposed Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000.01 $178,278 $309,829 $367,398 86,987 45,247 44,956 6,379,909 7,139,338 7,106,696 76,749 425,162 400,516 $6,721,923 $7,919,566 $7,919,566 7.0 8.0 8.0 Adopted Budget 2000-01 $367,398 44,956 7,105,946 401,266 $7,919,566 8.0 S-43 relly... S-44 1 CITY MANAGER 1 1 ------------------ i 1 CULTURE AND TOURISM Fort Worth Convention and Visitors Bureau • Fort Worth Convention Center Improvements Arts Council of Fort Worth and Tarrant County ® Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth • Fort Worth Museum of Science and History Fort Worth Sister Cities • World Affairs Council of Greater Fort Worth . Will Rogers Memorial Center Improvements • Fart Worth Herd 8.o A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources Million $ 10.Of 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 O Expenditures 6 4 2 0 1997 Authorized Positions Changes in Strength 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Positions l SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES 5-45 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CULTURE AND TOURISM GG04/0241000:0247000 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $7,919,566 A.R. 8.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $7,919,566 A.P. 8.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $56,455 for salary increases and the increased cost of feed for the Fort Worth Herd. B) The adopted budget decreases by ($14,135) for minor capital improvements at Public Events Department facilities and by ($39,680) for the Convention and Visitors Bureau marketing fund to offset the cost increases in the Fort Worth Herd. C) The adopted budget increases by $25,250 for the Sister Cities program for costs associated with an anniversary celebration with sister city Bandung, Indonesia. This cost is offset by the elimination of one-time funding of $26,000 for the World Affairs Council. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET _. J r+1-ry Y'Sf PAT'ST.SNIPIP9TL7 nnnn rtA 'RI tRiA'PT DEPARTMENT CULTURE AND TOURISM FUND GG04 CULTURE AND TOURISM Center Center Description Convention Support 0240500 Operations and Maintenance of WRMC and FWCC 0240600 FWCC/WRMC Capital Improvements 0240700 Fort Worth Herd Sub -Total 0241000 Convention and Vistors Bureau Special Public Facilities Fund Sub -Total Arts Council 0242000 Arts Council Sub -Total Museums 0243010 Fort Worth Museum of Science and History 0243020 Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth Sub -Total Van Cliburn Foundation. Inc. 0244000 Van Cliburn Foundation, Inc. Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $781,802 $971,807 $971,807 $971,807 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 414,651 400,516 401,266 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 386,968 382,911 439,366 439,366 7_0 8_0 8_0 8=0 $1,168,770 $1,769,369 $1,811,689 $1,812,439 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 $3,845,556 $4,355,761 $4,355,761 $4,355,761 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 429,375 439,680 400,000 400,000 0_0 0_0 000 0_0 $4,274,931 $4,795,441 $4,755,761 $4,755,761 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $110.000 $112.640 $110,000 $110.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $110,000 $112,640 $110,000 $110,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $491,396 $503,190 $503,190 $503,190 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 427,491 437,751 437,751 437,751 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $918,887 $940,941 $940,941 $940,941 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25 000 $62,600 $62,600 $62,600 0_0 0_0 0_0 OA $25,000 $62,600 $62,600 $62,600 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DEPARTMENT CULTURE AND TOURISM FUND GG04 CULTURE AND TOURISM Center Center Description Fort Worth Sister Cities 0247000 Fort Worth Sister Cities 0247010 World Affairs Council Sub -Total TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $224,335 $212,575 $212,575 $237,825 0 26,000 26,000 0 $224,335 $238,575 $238,575 $237,825 $6,721,923 $7,919,566 $7,919,566 $7,919,566 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0_0 0_0 0_0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 cn 0 S-51 FUND STATEMENT CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FUND The Cable Communications Fund was created in 1981 shortly after the franchise agreement with Sammons Cable was approved. The Cable Communications Fund was established to meet the obligations of construction and regulations as outlined in the original contract. In 1995, Sammons Cable was purchased by Marcus Cable, resulting in a revised franchise agreement. In 1999, a new franchise agreement was implemented when Marcus Cable was purchased by Charter Communications. The Cable Communications Fund is part of the City Manager's Office. The primary functions of the fund include management of all matters relating to the cable television franchise and limited franchises, administration of the portion of Special Trust Fund 72 that funds the City's cable television operation, and quarterly production of 210 hours of original, non -character generated programming hours for the two cable television channels for which the City is responsible, Channel 7 and 45. In an effort to produce the required programming, the Cable Communications Office covers and records City meetings for public viewing and also has in-house studios for a variety of special interest programming. The Cable production crews also film a variety of topics in the field. In addition, they produce a televised version of the City Page publication that appears in area newspapers. Finally, they accept and schedule videotapes from private citizens and organizations to be aired during the public access hours. Revenue for the Cable Communications Fund is derived from several sources. For instance, the Cable Communications Fund receives a portion of each cable subscriber's monthly fee in order to produce a targeted level of original programming hours. Another revenue source is the production classes offered to the general public on a fee -for - service basis. In addition to subscriptions and classes, revenue is also generated from interest on Cable's fund reserves. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S 3 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS `FUND BUDGET SUMMARY ItSCALYEAR 2000=41 REVEN.UES:.: Program Income $81.9,979 Investment?Income 50,000 Video Charges 9,000 ,. TOTAL REVENUES.. .< $878,979 '' ,_ EXPpJ�URES. ,... Personal Services ${708,689 `. Supplies 58,451 Contractual Services 145,389 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES $812,529 Capital Outlay $63,346 TOTAL;EXPEN.DITURES $8M,875 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000.01 BUDGET COMPARISON OF CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Cable Communications $742,301 $742,301 $866.504 TOTAL. $742,301 $742,301 $866,504 RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1999-00 2000-01 $800.810 $875,875 $800,810 $875,875 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-57 COMPARISON OF CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE A❑OPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Program Income $763,936 $880,402 $812,504 $854,018 $819,979 Consolidated Investments 62,189 67,234 45,000 70,447 50,000 Video Charges 10,302 11,622 9,000 9,356 9,000 Auction Sales 145 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue 34,508 0 0 129.864 0 TOTAL $871,080 $959,258 $866,504 $1,063,685 $878,979 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY S-59 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FUN® FE72/002500100000 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Cable Communications Fund is part of the City Manager's Office. The primary functions of the fund include: management of all matters relating to the cable television franchise and limited franchises, administration of the portion of Special Trust Fund 72 which funds the City's cable television operation, and minimum quarterly production of 210 hours of original non -character generated programming hours for the two cable television channels under the purview of the City. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-1999 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $502,153 $559,394 $582,822 $608,689 Supplies 57,621 61,831 58,451 58,451 Contractual Services 170,167 175,279 145,389 145,389 Capital Outlay 12,360 70,000 63,346 63,346 Total Allocations $742,301 $866,504 $850,008 $875,875 lAuthorized Positions 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-60 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS w UND - 13.0 A. F) i CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE N I -CABLE COMIVIU UNICATIONS FUND '• Municipal affairs programs Community programming (Cable ] Channel 45) ® City Channel 7 Fort Worth Open Channel scheduling Franchise/limited franchise contract administration ® Administration of management 13 A. P. _ BUDGET Thousand $ Changes in Resources 1 1 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 113 Expenditures I AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 13 Positions j SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES S-61 DEPARTMENT FUND/ CENTER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FUND FE72/002500100000 CHANGES_ FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $866,504 A.P. 13.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $850,008 A.P. 13.0 A) The adopted budget decreases by ($40,000) for administrative services from the General Fund. B) The adopted budget increases by $25,867 for actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $13,000 in funds budgeted for terminal leave due to the retirement of staff in FY2000-01. D) The adopted budget decreases by ($12,000) for electricity because this charge is taken care of in the administrative services account. E) The adopted budget increases by $6,932 in funds budgeted for group health due to expected rate increases in FY2000-01. f r CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET y reducing the number of complaints This. A ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1998,99 1999 00 '' 20�0=07 1,466 1500 840 68 '0 70`. 307 500 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-07 BUDGE FUND: FUND STATEMENT LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND Under the direction of the Department of Engineering, the Lake Worth Trust Fund manages more than 500 lease properties adjacent to Lake Worth. Upon expiration of the leases, the Fund purchases improvements located on the leased properties, markets the properties for sale to the public and provides funding for the maintenance of park grounds located along the lake. The Fund is also responsible for all costs associated with five Deputy City Marshal positions and one Senior Deputy City Marshal position. These officers provide police protection for the parks and neighborhoods adjacent to the lake. S-65 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-69 COMPARISON OF LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL. ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Park Maintenance $147,995 $133,339 $132,575 $126,582 $172,178 Engineering Services 491,233 304,385 310,818 279,837 258,818 Lake Patrol 394,917 308,199 294,041 294,041 345,420 TOTAL $1,034,145 $745,923 $737,434 $700,460 $776,416 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-71 COMPARISON OF LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Interest Earned on Leases $4,708 $2,977 $3,000 $2,978 $450 Interest Earned on Investments 65,358 182,695 165,000 167,849 140,000 Rental Income 0 0 7,500 0 0 Boat Fees 18,931 21,836 15,000 24,000 11,650 Lease Income 54 524,137 595.000 581,573 486,000 Lease Transfer Fees 563,737 (7,250) 5,100 4,980 5,000 Use of Fund Balance 0 0 0_ 0 133,316 TOTAL $652,788 $724,395 $790,600 $781,380 $776,416 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 61- VAM DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER ENGINEERING - LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND FE70/030:038:080 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Lake Worth Trust Fund manages more than 500 leaseholds adjacent to Lake Worth; purchases improvements located on the properties upon expiration of the leases; markets the properties for sale to the public; and provides funding for the maintenance of park grounds located along the lake. The Lake Worth Trust Fund also funds all costs associated with five Deputy City Marshal positions and one Senior Deputy City Marshal position that provide lake patrol police protection for the parks and neighborhoods adjacent to the lake. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $0 $0 $0 $0 Supplies 0 0 0 0 Contractual Services 745,923 737,434 776,416 776,416 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $745,923 $737,434 $776,416 $776,416 Authorized Positions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-74 Thousand $ -__ fr LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND- 0.0 A. P. P------------ - - - - - - 1 ENGINEERING 1 1 1 ------------------ BUDGET Changes in Resources LAKE WORTH TRUST • Lake Worth management • Land use planning • Development coordination and oversight • Park maintenance and patrol 0.0 A. P. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 ll Expenditures I AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 8-IX, 7� 4-/- 3-� 2� 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 M Positions SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES S-75 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER LAKE WORTH TRUST FUND FE701030:038:080 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $737,434 A.P. 0.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $776,416 A.P. 0.0 A) The proposed budget decreases ($52,000) due to a decrease in engineering services, based on historical spending patterns and projections for FY2000-01. B) The proposed budget increases $31,120 for the replacement of a Lake Worth patrol boat. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL NfE.ASURES AC' 19! ESTIMATED PROJECTED 1999-00 2000.0l CITY OF FORT WORTH 20M01 BUDGET' FUND: S-79 FUND STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND The Environmental Management Fund was established in 1992 to provide sufficient funds to meet the expanding environmental needs of the City. Currently, much of the fund is devoted to implementing and monitoring the City's Storm Water Permit. The permit was granted by the Environmental Protection Agency and became effective on December 1, 1996. Funds not designated for the permit are utilized for emergency environmental situations, such as chemical spills, and special needs, such as asbestos abatement at City -owned properties. The Environmental Management Department manages the Environmental Management Fund, and is responsible for the oversight of all personnel and projects implemented under the Fund. Currently, there are eight projects set up within the Fund: Undesignated, Compliance, Regulatory, Construction Inspection, Spill Response, the Environmental Collection Center, Storm Water Monitoring, and Education. The Environmental Management Fund is supported by: a) the Environmental Protection Fee, which is charged on residential and commercial water bills; b) revenue from the Environmental Collection Center, which is collected from participating cities in the Household Hazardous Waste Program; c) and interest on investments. The Fund's expenditures include personnel costs associated with the 20 staff members, operating supply costs, and capital equipment, such as vehicles and heavy machinery. The Environmental Protection Fee is a monthly charge that varies based upon customer category. Homeowners and apartment complex customers are charged $0.50; municipal and non-profit organizations are charged $0.75; residential duplexes are charged $1.00; commercial properties are charged $10.00; commercial multi -unit properties are charged $20.00; and industrial properties are charged $35.00. A 12- member panel composed of private citizens and businesses set these rates. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-83 COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND EXPENDITURES Engineering Services* Remediations* Asbestos Abatement* TPW Street Sweeping* City Waste Disposal* Emergency Spill Response* Bridge Street Facility* Undesignated Regulatory Function Construction Inspection Spill Response Program Environmental Resource Collection Center Storm Water Program Education Component Compliance TOTAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 $37,396 $125,438 $0 $108,258 $0 217,062 295,303 0 687,015 0 549,419 31,244 0 727,850 0 0 11,677 0 188,323 0 104,787 76,662 0 75,179 0 6,076 4,980 0 10,000 0 284,547 0 0 0 0 11,594 22,975 1,585,334 17,316 1,086,962 116,434 94,819 116,243 63,246 116,369 166,475 105,113 81,940 75,995 86,345 173,744 164,464 179,973 175,381 232,299 355,359 526,425 618,062 522,542 607,367 191,011 178,816 169,491 161,345 180,434 80,973 122,059 123,942 118,761 125,049 0 0 39,634 37,707 525,771 $2,294,877 $1,759,975 $2,914,619 $2,968,918 $2,960,596 * Funds are appropriated in Undesignated and transferred to projects as needed. The actual expenditures are reflected in the broad categories of the first seven line items. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET S-85 COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Environmental Protection Fee $2,561,068 $2,595,291 $2,520,000 $2,619,550 $2,570,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 16,656 1,451 0 10,592 0 Participating Cities 179,450 252,314 275,000 226,881 275,000 Interest on Investments 157,686 207.284 150,000 161,000 100,000 TOTAL $2,914,860 $3,056,340 $2,945,000 $3,018,023 $2,945,000 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND R103/0521100:0524106 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Environmental Management Fund is used to ensure that the City is in compliance, or developing means to achieve compliance, with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water permit as well as other state and federal environmental regulations. The Fund supports eight components: Undesignated, Compliance, Regulatory, Construction Inspection, Spill Response, The Environmental Collection Center, Storm Water Program, and Education. The Undesignated monies will be used in emergency situations and for funding major compliance issue projects. The Compliance Unit performs the tasks required to keep City's facilities and operations in compliance with state and federal environmental regulations. The Regulatory Section is responsible for the interpretation of all federal and state environmental regulations, and oversees the Brownfields Program and Project Excel. The Construction Inspection performs reviews of construction permit applications, plans, and sites. The Spill Response Program responds to spills that could adversely affect the storm water system. The Environmental Collection Center (ECC) collects and disposes household hazardous waste. A mobile collection unit is also part of the ECC operations The Storm Water Program monitors and analyzes the storm water system to ensure chemical parameters are within the limits required by the permit. The Education Component educates the public on storm water pollution prevention, air quality issues, and household hazardous waste disposal methods. Allocations Actual Adopted 1998-99 1999-00 Personal Services $777,166 $804,816 Supplies 63,168 90,415 Contractual Services 919,641 2,019,388 Capital Outlay 0 0 Total Allocations $1,759,975 $2,914,619 Authorized Positions 1 20.0 1 20.0 Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 2000-01 2000-01 $866,547 78,443 1,944,934 0 $2,889,924 20.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET $937,219 78,443 1,944,934 0 $2,960,596 20.0 S-87 S-88 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND - 20.0 A. P. Million $ 3 2 2 1 7 0 0 UNDESIGNATED PROJECT FUND (R101) • Engineering Services • Remediations • Asbestos Abatement • Household Waste Events • City Waste Disposal • Emergency Spill Response • Collection Center 0.0 A. P. BUDGET Changes in Resources 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 I13Expenditures I ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND OPERATING FUND (R103) • Regulatory function • Construction inspection • Spill response • Household hazardous waste program and facility • Storm water investigation • Public education • Compliance 20.0 A. P. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Changes in Strength 0 y 1997 1998 1999 1 13 Positions 2000 2001 i•�aL:m SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND R103/0521100:0524106 CHANGES_ FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $2,914,619 A.P. 20.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $2,960,596 A.P. 20.0 A) The adopted budget increases by $501,046 for such disposal projects as asbestos abatement, medical waste disposal, light and ballast recycling, spill response contracts, and other similar disposal projects. B) The adopted budget increases by $110,732 due to actual and anticipated salary increases. C) The adopted budget increases by $71,500 to reflect actual expenses in laboratory services. D) The adopted budget increases by $5,649 for group health costs due to projected FY 2000-01 rate increases . E) The adopted budget increases by $2,130 for the replacement of existing computers with leased ones. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 5-92 .. DEPARTMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES DEPARTMENT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND DEPARTMENT PURPOSE . . To ensure City compliance with environmental reguiations and to maintain and promote a safe environment for .the residents of Fort'Worth through innovative `and cost-effective prevention programs. . . _ .. 20Q0.01 DERARTMENTAL OBJECTIVES . To increase the rt;umber of dry weather field screens To maintain the number of wet weathervatershed screens. To operate a permanent household hazardous waste collection facility with participation from surrounding municipalities. To maintain' a spill response program to;' address small spills throughout the city as required by federal permit. [: .:.: . MEASURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED, . . :: . .DEPARTMENTAL 1998-99 '1999-00 . 2000 01. ..Dry weather field screens 137 ' 165 200 Wet weather. watershed screens 9 ::10 1.0 Households served at'the Environmental Collection 9,254 9,600 9,800 Center $pill responses addressed ` 1,480 1,600 1,800 CITY' OF FORT;WORTH 2O00 0't+ BUDGET DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FUND ENVIRONMENTAL R103 MANAGEMENT FUND Center Center Description 0521100 Undesignated/Projects 0524100 Regulatory Function 0524101 Construction Inspection 0524102 Spill Response Program 0524103 Environmental Collection 0524104 Storm Water Program 0524105 Education Component 0524106 Compliance TOTAL DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Expenditures Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 $568,279 $1,585,334 $1,086,962 94,819 116,243 116,369 105,113 81,940 86,345 164,464 179,973 232,299 526,425 618,062 607,367 178,816 169,491 180,434 122,059 123,942 125,049 0 39.634 455.099 $1,759,975 $2,914,619 $2,889,924 Adopted Budget 2000-01 $1,086,962 116,369 86,345 232,299 607,367 180,434 125,049 525,771 $2,960,596 Adopted Budget 1998-99 0.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 a_0 20.0 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Budget 1999-00 0.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 0_0 20.0 Proposed Budget 2000-01 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 1_0 20.0 Adopted Budget 2000-01 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 1_0 20.0 G7 Cb w FUND STATEMENT 5-95 AWARDED ASSETS FUNDS The City of Forth Worth Police Department receives funds from the sale of assets seized in certain law enforcement activities in which the department has assisted federal and State law enforcement agencies. The process of liquidating and distributing seized assets is commonly called "asset forfeiture," and each asset received by the department is considered an "awarded asset." The federal asset forfeiture program is authorized by the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, while the State asset forfeiture program is authorized by Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The main goals of the federal and state asset forfeiture programs are to deprive criminals of property used in or acquired through illegal activities, to encourage joint operations among law enforcement agencies at various levels of government, and to strengthen law enforcement. Both programs require that the recipient law enforcement agency use the assets solely for law enforcement purposes, and that the assets be held in a special fund, subject to audit and review by the appropriate authorities. The City of Fort Worth Police Department is responsible for the receipt, expenditure, and oversight of awarded assets. Prior to FY2000-01, revenues and expenditures budgeted from the City's awarded assets were held in the Special Project Trust Fund. In an effort to improve tracking and auditing capabilities in FY2000-01, the Police Department worked with the Accounting Division of the Finance Department to establish two new operating funds for awarded asset proceeds: the Federal Awarded Assets Fund and the State Awarded Assets Fund. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET S-97 f FEDERAL AWARDED ASSETS FUND BUDGET?SUMMARY '; FISCAL_ YEAR 20g0 q1 REVENUES:': . Federal.Awarded Assets $375,000 nvemens .Interestn 805 2;o TOTAL REVENUES $395,538 EXPENDITURES:. ': Executive'Services Bureau Matching Grant Funds {DART Expanded/Child Intervention} $1'25,565 Explorer Program 32,000 Explorer Overtime 13,325 TPA Membership 20,000 Training Classroom Projectors 21,00©. Classified Services Funds 2,500. Sub-Tatai $2.14,39Q Adrninistrat�ve Services'i3ureau Loggingllnveritory Tracking System {Auto Pound) $42,750 Sub -Total $42,7v0 Field Operations Bureau NPO Youth Programs 8 000 Sub -Total $8,000 Special Services Bureau Evidence Collection;Equipment $47 898 Public Database Investigation System 507000 DEA Vehicle Fuel 2,5. . Special Operations Informant Funds 25.000. Sub -Total $ l:25,398. Operations Support Bureau DARE Summer Program 5 000 :.:Sub -Total.:: ` $5,OOQ . TOTAL EXPENDITURES.. $395,538 t. CITY OF'FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGIET ........................................... S-99 f: STATE AWARDED ASSETS FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2000-{fI . REVENIJ.ESt State Awarded Assets . 25p,00p ' ofnvemen#s 3eInrest 3459n TOTAL REVENUES $289,435 `" `EXPENDITURES: Executive`'Services Bureau Matching Grant Funds (SCRAM, STEP) $285.03.5 Sub -Total $285,035 Administrative ServicesiBureau ©igital Camera -Crime Lab ' $9p0 Mobilization Module for 991System 3,500 Sub -Total $4,400. TOTAL EXPENDITURES. $289,435 .. :. . \ .... .. . .: .. . C[TY OF'FORT WORTH 200©-Q1 BUDGET S CITY OF FORT WORTH.2000-09 BUDGET SUMMARY OF CITY OF FORT WORTH GRANT PROGRAM PARTICIPATION FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 COST INVOLVEMENT i AGENCY DEPT. IN -KIND CITY OF FORT TOTAL COST COST MATCH WORTH MATCH TITLE Fuller Foundation Fuller Garden Maintenance $88,461 $88,461 $0 $0 Fort Worth Botanical Societv Gardener & Maintenance Worker/ Japanese Garden 70,239 70,239 0 0 Texas Department of Housing and Communitv Affairs Community Services Block Grant 860,355 860,355 0 0 Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program 1,452,836 1,452,836 0 0 Texas Criminal Justice Division Sex Offender Reg istrationlMonitoring Unit 258,606 135,058 0 123,548 Child Violence Intervention Project 47,561 17,643 0 29,918 Enhanced Domestic Assault Team 151,835 78,355 17,139 56,341 Domestic Assault Response Team 136,394 79,949 17,139 39,306 Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant Program 327,272 294,545 0 32,727 Fort Worth Garden Club Inc. Community Center Coordinator 48,811 48,811 0 0 Audio Visual Specialist 32,270 32,270 0 0 Sr. Maintenance Worker/ Botanic Garden 34,544 34,544 0 0 Administrative Technician 35,310 35,310 0 0 Downtown Fort Worth, Inc. Burnett Park Maintenance 193,700 193,700 0 0 U. S. Department of Housina and Urban Development Cooperative Agreement for Fair Housing 68,000 68,000 0 0 Community Development Block Grant 7,673,000 7,673,000 0 0 Emergency Shelter Grant 272,000 272,000 0 0 Home Investment Partnerships Program 2,756,000 2,756,000 0 0 U. S. Eaual Emnlovment Opportunity Commission Title VII EEOC Contract 141,500 141,500 0 0 S-9 a3 S-104 SUMMARY OF CITY OF FORT WORTH GRANT PROGRAM PARTICIPATION AGENCY DEPT. IN -KIND CITY OF FORT TOTAL COST COST MATCH WORTH MATCH TITLE Citv of Fort Worth Housing Department Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 20,346 20,346 Bureau of Justice Assistance 2000 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant 1,380,000 1,200,000 Texas Department of Human Services Summer Food Program 380,903 380,903 Environmental Protection Agency/Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Air Pollution Control 431,104 327,120 Texas Department of Transportation Safe & Sober STEP (Selective Traffic Enformcement Program) 224,832 102,064 Intersection Traffic Control Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (ITC STEP) 119,686 80,967 Routine Airfield Maintenance Program 40,000 20,000 Spinks Airfield Maintenance 880,000 782,223 Texas State Library Interlibrary Loan 235,053 235,053 U. S. Justice Department Law Enfocement Block Grant - Core Community Projects 72,021 56,571 Texas Department of Protective and Reaulartory Service throughout Tarrant Countv 76106 Community Youth Development Project 111,000 56,000 TOTAL $18,543,639 $17,593,823 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 103,984 0 0 122,768 0 38,719 0 20,000 0 97,777 0 0 15,450 0 55,000 0 $208,712 $741,104 T-1 FUND: FUND STATEMENT CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT The Crime Control and Prevention District was implemented during FY1995-96. This district was made possible through voters' authorization of a half -cent increase in sales tax effective October 1, 1995. The district was authorized for five years. Revenue from this tax has been used to employ additional police officers, purchase replacement and new police vehicles, increase security at schools, and expand other crime fighting programs. Through the use of this money, the City of Fort Worth planned to reduce crime by an average of 10 percent for each of the five years. On May 6, 2000, a new election was held to re -authorize the district for an additional five-year period. Fort Worth residents voted in favor of re -authorization, which will allow the City of Fort Worth to continue the half -cent portion of the sales tax until the expiration of the five-year period. The new period begins October 1, 2000, and will continue until September 30, 2005. Voters will be given the opportunity to evaluate and possibly re -authorize the district again in the spring of 2005. A nine -member board of directors appointed by the City Council establishes the budget and policies of the Crime Control and Prevention District. By law, the City Manager proposes the annual district budget to the board, which then votes approval or disapproval after holding a mandatory public hearing. After the district board has approved the annual budget, it is forwarded to the City Council, which votes approval or disapproval after holding a mandatory public hearing of its own. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET . . ..... ..... ... .... ..... . . .... .. ..... ........... . T-3 . CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION.D.ISTRICT FUND BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR ZDDD-D1 REVENUES. Sales.Tax Collections ' $34,67d,863 School Security Initiative Support Fort Worth Independent School District $1,533,709 Keller Independent School District .. 61,Q83 ... Everman Independent School District 25,579 Crowley Independent School District 25,579 TOTAL SCHOOL SECURITY INITIATIVE SUPPORT $1,645,950 Interest on Investments 1,408,000 Demolition Contingency Fund 1,Q80,040 Fund Balance Savings 257,816 .. TOTAL REVENUES $39,Q62,669 .; EXPENDIT.U.RES:1 . .. Personal Services $15,144,384 Supplies;' 689,625 Contractual Services 15,971.396 TOTAL RECURRING EXPENSES $31,805,4D5 Capital Qutlay $3,996,624 Reserve <Sumplement'([nterest) 1,408,000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY AND RESERVE : $5,4Q4,624 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $37,210,029 UNPROGRAMMED FUNDS * $1,852,640 ahd:. .( . . .. Toiowfremegencyxpenuresnrevnuesora.od s CITY OF FORT WORTH 2Q00-p1 BUDGIE T-5 COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL. AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND EXPENDITURES Violent Crime and Ganqs Crime Response Teams Strategic Operations Fund Expanded Narcotics Investigation Gang Graffiti Enforcement Gang Graffiti Abatement SCRAM Sub -Total Neighborhood Crime Neighborhood Patrol Officers Neighborhood Policing Districts CODE BLUE Police Storefronts Demolition of Drug Houses Parks Community Policing Neighborhood Code Compliance Demolition of Substandard Structures Sub -Total ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000.01 $2,738,063 $2,826,521 $3,002,954 303,800 397,260 480,968 526,370 565,922 610,359 425,470 441,827 481,624 186,840 222,761 204,082 19,967 120.212 131,851_ $4,200,510 $4,574,503 $4,911,838 $1,608,892 $1,668,438 $1,863,396 2,329,812 2,734,285 2,834,118 170,785 68,669 181,600 67,260 39,961 119,950 42,750 70,520 108,000 743,473 558,700 789,206 227,121 232,370 268,279 0 1,083.623 0 $5,190,093 $6,456,566 $6,164,549 $3,002,954 $3,191,419 480,968 559,499 610,359 681,043 481,624 498,337 204,082 264,810 131.851 219.220 $4,911,838 $5,414,328 $1,863,396 $1,992,280 2,834,118 3,286,411 181,600 301,600 119,950 121,400 108,000 108,000 789,206 660,529 268,279 275,275 0 0 $6,164,549 $6,745,495 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET T-6 COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999.00 2000-01 School Safetv and Youth School Security Initiative $2,391,874 $2,903,665 $3,325,854 $3,325,854 $3,598,058 Expanded D.A.R.E. 568,823 0 0 0 0 Crime Prevention Program 0 0 0 0 1.400.000 Sub -Total $2,960,697 $2,903,665 $3,325,854 $3,325,854 $4,998,058 Police Department Enhancements Recruit Officer Training $792,837 $1,238,192 $1,179,182 $1,179,182 $1,327,434 Civil Service Pay Plan 4,393,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 5,329,547 Increased Jail Costs 1,404,762 811,750 1,404,750 1,532,868 1,577,438 Replacement of High Mileage 2,808,302 3,360,118 2,975,200 2,975,200 3,475,200 Vehicles Special Operations Division 253,527 252,302 280,600 280,600 280,600 Vehicles Police Cadets 0 110,621 181,290 181,290 181,290 Contingency for Salary Increase 0 0 600,000 600,000 600,000 Special Events Overtime 0 411,323 445,840 445,840 481,507 Technology Infrastructure 0 1,295,693 1,267,697 1,267,697 2,130,892 Modernize Police Weapons 0 0 143,000 143,000 45,000 Video Cameras in Beat Patrol 0 0 105,240 105,240 105,240 Vehicles CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET T-7 COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 Police Department Enhancements (con't) Prisoner Transfer Van 0 0 31,550 31,550 0 CAD Project Transfer* 0 10,286,974 0 0 0 Mobile Data Computers* 0 1,761,380 0 0 2,500,000 Program Evaluation/Resource 0 0 0 0 610,000 Analysis Reimbursement for Election Costs 0 0 0 120.000 0 Sub -Total $9,652,975 $24,857,900 $13,943,896 $14,192,014 $18,644,148 Reserve Supplement (Interest] $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,408,000 TOTAL $22,004,275 $38,792,634 $28,346,137 $28,594,255 $37,210,029 * Funds for CAD Project and Mobile Data Computer first year leases transferred to Specially Funded Capital Projects Fund during FY1998-99. Lease payments and portions of the CAD Project expenses incurred during FY1999-00. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 111111KIIIIIIII COMPARISON OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT FUND REVENUES Sales Tax Collections School Security Initiative Support Fort Worth Ind. School District Keller Ind. School District Everman Ind. School District Crowley Ind, School District Sub -total Interest Earned Miscellaneous Revenue Demolition Contingency Fund Fund Balance Savings TOTAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -ESTIMATE ADOPTED 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 $29,398,031 $31,334,070 $33,337,368 $34,443,757 $34,670,863 $1,325,893 $899,853 $1,383,609 $1,383,609 $1,533,709 0 0 55,431 55,431 61,083 0 0 0 0 25,579 0 0 0 0 25,579 $1,325,893 $899,853 $1,439,040 $1,439,040 $1,645,950 $1,334,487 $666,666 $0 $1,075,020 $1,408,000 $3,067 $7,825 $0 $200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,080,040 K0 Lo $257.816 $32,061,478 $32,908,414 $34,776,408 $36,958,017 $39,062,669 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT -POLICE GR79/0351000:0356500 SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Police Department, under the direction of the Chief of Police, develops and implements programs to deter crime and enforce traffic laws in order to protect life and property within the City of Fort Worth. Specific departmental responsibilities include: crime prevention, the apprehension of persons suspected of committing crimes, recovery of stolen property, and regulation of non -criminal conduct such as traffic enforcement. Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget Allocations 1998-99 1999.00 2000.01 2000-01 Personal Services $11,640,616 $12,952,181 $14,438,312 I $14,438,312 Supplies 1,649,014 I 754,042 647,407 647,407 Contractual Services 21,075,251 10,474,247 15,519,072 15,519,072 Capital Outlay 3,413,922 2,904,100 3,996,624 3,996,624 Total Allocations $37,778,803 $27,084,670 $34,601,415 $34,601,415 Authorized Positions 169.0 I 174.0 176.0 176.0 T-1 I CITY OF FORT WORTH 2000-01 BUDGET T-12 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT - GR79/0214002 CITY SERVICES SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES: The Code Compliance -Division of City Services is represented in the Crime Control and Prevention District budget. The Code Compliance Division promotes and enforces the environmental code of the City through inspection of neighborhoods and buildings. Public relations and educational programs are integral parts of an effort to reduce the need for a primary focus on enforcement; however, legal action to enforce the City code is initiated when necessary. Enforcement of environmental codes is an invaluable tool in crime prevention because of the relationship between neighborhood deterioration and high incidences of criminal activity. Code enforcement activity often helps in criminal investigations, particularly at locations involved in drugs and stolen vehicles, and will contribute to an overall reduction of the crime rate and citizen fear of crime. Allocations Actual Adopted Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 Personal Services $198,579 $196,236 $203,232 $203,232 Supplies 22,489 33,888 33,888 33,888 Contractual Services 11,302 38,155 38,155 38,155 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Total Allocations $232,370 $268,279 $275,275 $275,275 Authorized Positions 6.0 I 6.0 6.0 1 6.0 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENTAL, BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT FUNDICENTER CRIME CONTROL_ & PREVENTION DISTRICT- GR79/0800511:0808080 PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL REPONSIBILITIES: Parks and community policing and security and graffiti abatement are integral parts of crime control and prevention. While aggressive law enforcement activity is an obvious need in making Fort Worth the safest large city in the United States, this alone does not ensure that Fort Worth will remain a first-class city. It is important that the public also have available quality of life amenities, including libraries, entertainment, and parks. People will use these amenities, particularly the parks, only if they feel safe in them. Graffiti, if left unabated, breeds even more graffiti and potential violent conflict among the gangs that spread it. Allocations Personal Services Supplies Contractual Services Capital Outlay Total Allocations Authorized Positions Actual Adopted 1998-99 1999-00 $470,941 $624,017 4,345 8,330 286,209 19,966 $781,461 2.0 360,941 0 $993,288 2.0 Proposed Budget Adopted Budget 2000-01 2000-01 $502,840 8,330 414,169 0 $925,339 2.0 $502,840 8,330 414,169 0 $925.339 2.0 T-13 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET 11 11 jim 11:11;1�K. . iq!11111 CRIME CONTR OL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT PARKS AND COMMUNITY CITY SERVICES POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT • Fiscal management and • Graffiti abatement • Environmental code equipment • Athletics compliance • Jail operations • Botanic Garden • Field operations . Late Night Program fi 0 A P. • School security initiative 2.0 A. • Special operations . Gang graffiti enforcement 176.0 A. P. BUDGET AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS iNillion $ Changes in Resources Changes in Strength Changes in Strength 40-/ 20� 200� 3 2 1 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 117Civilian Positions I 1 E 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 O Expenditures I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1 ❑ Civil Service Positions I SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES T-15 DEPARTMENT FUND/CENTER CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT GR79/021/035/080 CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $28,346,137 A.P. 182.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $37,210,029 A.P. 184.0 A) The adopted budget includes the addition of two School Security Initiative officers and vehicles. With the addition of schools within the Fort Worth city limits, the need for on -site officers continues to increase. Half of the salary expense of these officers will be reimbursed by the beneficiary school district. The total expense for the first year is budgeted at $174,315. During FY1999-00, additional schools were staffed by officers on loan from the General Fund. B) The adopted budget increases by $2,500,000 for mobile data computer leases and maintenance. FY1999-00 operating expenses for this project were incurred in the Specially Funded Capital Projects Fund through a FY1998-99 transfer from the Crime Control and Prevention District (CCPD) Fund and therefore were not reflected in the FY1999-00 CCPD operating budget. C) The adopted budget increases by $913,024 for technology enhancements to the existing network infrastructure. The solutions will respond to records management issues, information availability to citizens, officer efficiency, and training. Projects include a new mug shot system, live - scan fingerprint system, an accident report imaging system, and a records management consulting project. In addition, funding is included for crime lab improvements necessary to achieve accreditation. The changes should increase prosecution and conviction rates. This increase is offset by a ($49,829) reduction in one-time GIS expenses. D) The adopted budget reflects $803,240 across all programs for salary increases and step raises of CCPD sworn personnel. Increases occurred in base salaries, overtime, shift differentials, and retirement as a result. E) The adopted budget increases by $1,400,000 to assist Fort Worth area schools in the development and implementation of an After School Program. F) The adopted budget increases by $610,000 for the evaluation of all CCPD programs, as well as a resource and staffing analysis of the entire department by an outside consultant. G) The adopted budget increases by $500,000 for vehicle replacement. H) The adopted budget increases by $172,688 for jail costs paid to Tarrant County. The costs are paid from the General Fund, but are partially offset by a transfer from the CCPD Fund. The County has agreed to an arrangement in which the City pays an additional two percent (2%) each year to cover cost of living increases. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET T-16 SIGNIFICANT BUDGET CHANGES DEPARTMENT CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CHANGES FROM 1999-00 ADOPTED TO 2000-01 ADOPTED 1999-00 ADOPTED: $28,346,137 A.P. 182.0 2000-01 ADOPTED: $37,210,029 A.P. 184.0 1) The adopted budget increases by $148,251 for Recruit Officer Training for recruit salary increases that were approved after the FY1999-00 CCPD budget was adopted. J) The adopted budget decreases by ($128,677) in park security funding to more accurately reflect actual spending in previous years. The Police Department and Parks and Community Services Department are working together to maximize the effectiveness of officer and private security assignments. K) The adopted budget increases by $120,000 for CODE;BLUE funding to purchase radios for citizen patrollers, search teams, and reserve officers. The Police Department will purchase 80 radios per year over two years to provide additional equipment for this program. L) The adopted budget increases by $80,000 in the Sex Crimes Registration Apprehension and Monitoring (SCRAM) program for sex offender notification requirements. Due to the increases in advertising costs and potential increases in the notification requirements, additional funding is necessary. M) The adopted budget increases by $50,000 for contract gang graffiti abatement to provide year- round paint matching services and to reduce the negative impact of graffiti on the community. CITY OF FORT WORTH 2O00-01 BUDGET DEPARTMENT POLICE FUND GR79 CCPD Center Center Description Executive Services Bureau 0352100 Fiscal & Equipment Management 0352101 Demolition of Substandard Structures 0352400 Staff Services 0352500 Training 0352501 Police Cadets Sub -Total Operations Support Bureau 0353400 Forensics/Property Division 0353501 Jail Sub -Total North/West Field Operations Bureau 0354000 North/West Field Operations 0354001 CODE BLUE 0354100 North Division Zero Tolerance 0354101 Neighborhood Policing District 1 0354102 Neighborhood Policing District 2 0354104 Strategic Operations Fund -North 0354700 Storefront Program 0354900 West Division 0354901 Neighborhood Policing District 10 0354903 Neighborhood Policing District 12 0354904 Strategic Operations Fund - West Sub -Total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 199B-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $20,840,134 $9,081,428 $11,692,226 $11,160,409 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,083,623 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,263,635 1,267,697 4,298,544 4,298,544 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,238,192 1,322,183 1,372,434 1,372,434 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 110,621 181,290 181,290 181,290 0_0 0_0 0_0 0_0 $24,536,205 $11,852,598 $17,544,494 $17,012,677 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 811,750 1,404,750 1,577,438 1,577,438 0_0 000 0_0 0=0 $811,750 $1,404,750 $1,777,438 $1,777,438 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $1,599,753 $1,863,396 $1,992,280 $2,108,189 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 $68,669 $181,600 $301,600 $301,600 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 667,602 711,933 747,386 788,295 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 251,248 302,231 526,878 533,696 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 256,149 259,068 272,107 278,925 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 70,037 69,262 79,333 79,333 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39,961 119,950 121,400 121,400 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 852,391 879,964 925,316 925,316 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 398,546 382,414 402,810 402,810 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 310,483 338,146 335,922 335,922 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 104,509 158,556 181,609 181,609 0_0 0_0 0_0 00.0 $4,619,348 $5,266,520 $5,886,641 $6,057,095 68.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 1 00 DEPARTMENT POLICE FUND GR79 CCPD Center Center Description South/East Field Operations Bureau 0355100 South Division 0355101 Neighborhood Policing District 7 0355103 Strategic Operations Fund - South 0355900 East Division 0355901 Neighborhood Policing District 4 0355903 Neighborhood Policing District 6 0355904 Neighborhood Policing District 7 0355905 Strategic Operations Fund -East Sub -total Special Services Bureau 0356000 Special Services Bureau 0356103 VPC-Family Violence 0356202 School Security Initiative 0356300 Special Operations Division 0356304 Gang Graffiti 0356500 Traffic Sub -total DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $689,920 $696.329 $742,377 $783,286 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 450,039 391,939 465,774 476,001 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 69,520 69,262 79,333 79,333 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 615,285 674,837 736,449 777,358 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 352,831 352,382 349,605 359,832 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 264,346 314,333 338,750 338,750 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 450,607 493,604 594,565 604,792 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 53.774 69,262 79,333 79,333 0=0 0_0 0_0 0=0 $2,946,322 $3,061,948 $3,386,186 $3,498,685 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 $422,229 $503,226 $528,491 $528,491 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 120,212 131,851 219,220 226,038 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,903,665 3,325,854 3,598,058 3,778,740 46.0 51.0 53.0 53.0 565,922 610,359 681,043 715,134 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 441,827 481,624 498,337 525,610 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 411,323 445,840 481,507 481,507 4_0 000 0_0 0_0 $4,865,178 $5,498,754 $6,006,656 $6,255,520 66.0 71.0 73.0 73.0 TOTAL -POLICE DEPARTMENT $37,778,803 $27,084,570 $34,601,415 $34,601,415 169.0 174.0 176.0 176.0 DEPARTMENT CITY SERVICES FUND GR79 CCPD Center Center Description Code Compliance Division 0214002 Field Operations TOTAL - CITY SERVICES DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 232 370 $268,279 $275,275 $275,275 $232,370 $268,279 $275,275 $275,275 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 6_0 6_0 6_0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6_0 6.0 DEPARTMENT PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES FUND GR79 CCPD Center Center Description Communitv Services Division 0800511 Late Night/Youth Program Southwest Reaion 0807080 Botanic Garden Northeast Reaion 0808040 Graffiti Abatement 0808060 Youth Program 0808070 Aquatics 0808080 Haws Athletic Center Sub -total TOTAL - PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Planned Reserve Supplement From Interest Earnings TOTAL -ALL DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY BY CENTER ALLOCATIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Actual Adopted Proposed Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Adopted Expenditures Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2000-01 $451,904 $556,211 $492,306 $492,306 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $92,960 $134,288 $134,288 $134,288 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $222,761 $204,082 $264,810 $264,810 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0 31,500 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 37,345 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13,836 29,862 33,935 33,935 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $236,597 $302,789 $298,745 $298,745 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 $781,461 $993,288 $925,339 $925,339 2.0 $0 $0 $1,408,000 $1,408,000 $38,792,634 $28,346,137 $37,210,029 $37,210,029 177.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 182.0 184.0 184.0 IV O AM 1' 1 B ! ! The City Council has approved the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 budget, which includes funding for next year's step increases, performance pay increases and civil service salary adjustments. The budget also inclu&s funding for market increases to specific classifications. The compensation plan for FY 2000/2001 will be implemented at the beginning of pay period 21 (September 23rd), All salary increases including step movement and performance pay increases will be effective pay period 21 for those employees with October 1, 2000 anniversary dates. Market adjustments will be made effective in the same pay period. Following are the general guidelines and information on the implementation of salary increases for this year. Non -Exempt Employee Performance Step Plan (Non -Civil Service) Employees with October I' anniversary dates will be eligible for a step(s) increase beginning pay period 21 (9/23/00). The amount of the step increase will be contingent on the employeds performance level and current step. No employee will be permitted to exceed the top step (L) of the range based on performance. ■ No employee will be permitted to receive more than an 11% salary adjustment based on market increase and step movement during the year. If the employee's total salary adjustment will exceed the 11 % limit, the employee will not be eligible to receive a step increase until the employee's next anniversary date. Employees in this category will have the limitation stated on thdr PRD. Employees currently at or above the L step and who do not receive a market increase will be eligible for a lump -sum performance bonus on their anniversary date. Employees who receive an Excellent (4) rating on their annual performance review will receive a 1% bonus. Employees who receive an Outstanding (5) rating on their annual performance review will receive a 2% bonus. The bonus will be paid by separate check at the end of the appropriate pay period associated with the employee's anniversary date. The bonus will not be added to base pay. ■ Individuals with anniversary dates other than October V' will be eligible for a step increase based on their normal anniversary date. The 11% limitation on salary adjustment based on market increase and step movement will apply throughout the year. 0 Page 1 U-2 L Exempt Employee Performance Pay Plan (Non -Civil Service) ■ Performance pay increases will be based on an employee's performance level and current quintile. The percent increase for eligible employees is displayed in the following Table. EXEMPT PERFORMANCE PAY PLAN Quintile 1 2 3 4 5 Outstanding S% 7% 6% 5% 4% Excellent 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% Competent 3% 2% 1% 0 0 Below Standard 0 0 0 0 0 Unacceptable 0 0 0 0 0 ■ Employees will not be permitted to exceed the top of the salary range based on their performance rating. Employees in this category will be limited to the top of the range. ■ Employees will not be permitted to receive a salay adjustment greater than 11% based on market adjustment and performance increase. Employees in this category will have the limitation stated on their PRD. ■ Employees at or above the top of their salary range will not be eligible for a performance increase. Employees currently at or above the top of their salary range and who do not receive a market increase will be eligible for a performance bonus. Employees who receive an Excellent (4) rating on their annual performance review will receive a I % bonus. Employees who receive an Outstanding (5) rating on their annual performance review will receive a 2% bonus. The bonus will be paid by separate check at the end of pay period 21, The performance bonus will not be added to base pay. ■ Anniversary dates for exempt employees will not change. They will continue to be established according to current practice. H. Market Adjustments ■ Market adjustments to specific classifications will be made effective September 23, 2000, Market adjustments will be made by changing the classification's pay grade to a new grade level. Employees will maintain their relative position in the new pay grade. Non-exempt employees will be placed in the higher pay grade at their current step. Exempt employees will have their pay adjusted by the percent of the market adjustment as long as it does not exceed 11%. III. Sworn Police and Fire ■ A 6% increase to the salary'range of all sworn ranks will be made effective September 23rd. ■ Individuals eligible for a regular step increase will receive it based on their normal anniversary date. 0 Page 2 ME IV. General Information ■ SO s will not receive automatic salary adjustments. Departments will need to submit PARS to reflect any desired changes. As always with the implementation of the annual compensation plan, there may be some unanticipated issues or problems that develop. You are encouraged to contact me at extension 7783, Dick Hodapp, 7770, Jose Moreno, 7781 or Sandy Buchert, 7785 if any issue arises or if you have questions about implementation procedures. As always, I appreciate your cooperation. o Page 3 U-4 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS AE1 CITY MANAGER 9522 — 15711 10% Range Adjustment AE3 CITY ATTORNEY 7617 — 12568 10% Range Adjustment AE5 CITY AUDITOR 6296 — 10388 10% Range Adjustment AE7 CITY SECRETARY 6296 — 10388 10% Range Adjustment AJ1 CHIEF JUDGE 5539 — 9139 10% Range Adjustment AJ3 DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE 5036 — 8309 10% Range Adjustment AJ5 MUNICIPAL JUDGE 4578 — 7554 10% Range Adjustment AJ7 HEARING OFFICER 2629 — 4338 10% Range Adjustment AR1 EXECUTIVE DIR RETIREMENT FUND 5287 — 8724 5% Range Adjustment A14 CLERICAL SUPERVISOR 2065 — 3263 A16 PROPERTY CONTROL SUPERVISOR 2390 — 3776 5% Market Adjust A18 PARTS/MATERIALS SUPERVISOR 2509 -- 3964 5% Market Adjust A21 CHIEF DEPUTY CITY MARSHAL 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust A23 DEPUTY COURT CLERK 3203 — 5061 5% Mrkt/5% Range A30 RETAIL SALES SUPERVISOR 2065 — 3263 A32 PLANS EXAMINER SUPERVISOR 3203 — 5061 A34 DEVELOPMENT INSPECTION SUPV 3203 — 5061 A36 CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR 3531 -- 5579 5% Market Adjust A38 BUILDING OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR 3051 — 4821 20% Market Adjust A41 BUILDING SERVICES SUPERVISOR 3051 -- 4821 20% Market Adjust A42 EQUIPMENT SERVICES SUPERVISOR 3363 — 5314 20% Market Adjust A43 ASST FIELD OPERATIONS SUPV 2509 — 3964 5% Market Adjust A45 FIELD OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR 2905 --- 4590 5% Market Adjust A47 SURVEY SUPERVISOR 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust A49 TRAFFIC SYSTEMS SUPERVISOR 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust A50 ANIMAL CONTROL SUPERVISOR 2635 — 4163 5% Market Adjust A52 WRANGLER SUPERVISOR Deleted Classification A63 GOLF PROFESSIONAL 3051— 4821 5% Market Adjust A65 ASST ZOO CURATOR 2635 — 4163 5% Market Adjust A67 ZOO CURATOR 3363 -- 5314 5% Market Adjust A69 COMMUNITY CENTER SUPERVISOR 2635 — 4163 5% Market Adjust A70 COMMUNICATIONS SHIFT SUPV 3203 — 5061 10% Market Adjust A72 DECOR UNIT SUPERVISOR 2905 — 4590 New Class A74 DECOR SHIFT SUPERVISOR 2509 — 3964 New Class A76 SECURITY SUPERVISOR 2168 — 3425 10% Market Adjust A77 AIRPORT OPERATIONS COORDINATOR 2276 ---- 3596 A80 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR 3531 — 5579 10% Market Adjust A81 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPV 2767 -- 4372 A90 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR 2635 — 4163 5% Market Adjust A92 ASST CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust A93 ASST WATER SYSTEMS PLANT SUPV 2767 — 4372 10% Market Adjust A94 WATER SYSTEMS PLANT SUPV 3203 — 5061 10% Market Adjust A96 ASST WATER SYSTEMS SUPT 3531 -- 5579 10% Market Adjust A98 WATER SYSTEMS MECHANIC SUPV 2905 — 4590 5% Market Adjust A99 INSTRUMENTATION/ELECT SUPV 3203 -- 5061 10% Market Adjust B03 SR LOAN SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE 2509 —3964 B05 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST 2905 — 4590 B10 SR ADMINISTRATIVE ASST 2905 -- 4590 5% Market Adjust B12 BENEFITS SPECIALIST 2767 — 4372 5% Market Adjust Revised October 16, 2000 Page 1 of 10 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS B 14 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 2509 — 3964 5% Market Adjust B 16 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 3051 — 4821 5% Market Adjust B21 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST 2767 — 4372 5% Market Adjust B23 SR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST 3051 — 4821 5% Market Adjust B24 FAVOR COORDINATOR 3363 — 5314 5% Market Adjust B25 HUMAN RESOURCES CONSULTANT 3531 — 5579 5% Market Adjust B26 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICER 1 2509 — 3964 B27 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICER II 3051 — 4821 B29 SR EMERGENCY_ MGMT OFFICER 3363 — 5314 B31 BUYER 2390 — 3776 5% Market Adjust B32 SR BUYER 2767 — 4372 5% Market Adjust B33 SR HUMAN SERVICES SPECIALIST 2509 — 3964 5% Market Adjust B34 PUBLIC EDUCATION SPECIALIST 2390 — 3776 5% Market Adjust B35 VICTIM ASSISTANCE SPECIALIST 2276 — 3596 New Class B36 SR VICTIM ASSISTANCE SPECIALIST 2509 — 3964 New Class B38 LAND AGENT 2767 — 4372 5% Market Adjust B40 SR LAND AGENT 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust B41 HUMAN RELATIONS SPECIALIST 2905 — 4590 5% Market Adjust B43 CONTRACT COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST 2390 -- 3776 B45 SR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE SPEC 2905 — 4590 B50 CONSUMER HEALTH SPECIALIST 2767 — 4372 B51 SR CONSUMER HEALTH SPECIALIST 3051 — 4821 New Class B52 EPIDEMIOLOGY SPECIALIST 2390 — 3776 B54 EPIDEMIOLOGIST 2905 — 4590 B55 CONSERVATION SPECIALIST 2767 — 4372 New Class B56 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST 2767 — 4372 15% Market Adjust B57 SR ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST 3203 — 5061 15% Market Adjust B58 COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSE 3051 — 4821 B61 MICROBIOLOGIST 2767 — 4372 10% Market Adjust B63 SR MICROBIOLOGIST 3203 — 5061 10% Market Adjust B65 QUALITY CONTROL SPECIALIST 2905 — 4590 10% Market Adjust B67 ASST HISTORICAL., CURATOR 2390 — 3776 10% Market Adjust B69 HISTORICAL CURATOR 2767 — 4372 10% Market Adjust B70 HORTICULTURIST 2905 — 4590 10% Market Adjust B72 SR HORTICULTURIST 3531 -- 5579 10% Market Adjust B74 FORESTER 2509 — 3964 10% Market Adjust B75 PARK NATURALIST ASSISTANT 2168 — 3425 New Class B76 PARK NATURALIST 2390 — 3776 10% Market Adjust B77 SR RECREATION PROGRAMMER 2390 — 3776 New Class B78 RECREATION PROGRAMMER 2168 — 3425 5% Market Adjust B79 CRIME ANALYST 2390 — 3776 5% Market Adjust 1381 LIBRARY ASSISTANT 2065 — 3263 5% Market Adjust B83 LIBRARIAN 2509 — 3964 5% Market Adjust B85 SR LIBRARIAN 2905 — 4590 5% Market Adjust B87 LIBRARY MATERIALS COORDINATOR 3531 — 5579 5% Market Adjust B88 LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT OFFICER 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust B89 CABLE PRODUCER/DIRECTOR 2276 — 3596 5% Market Adjust B90 EQUIPMENT TECHNICAL SPECIALIST 2635 — 4163 10% Market Adjust B92 TRAINING SPECIALIST 2509 — 3964 5% Market Adjust B94 EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR 2509 — 3964 10% Market Adjust B96 CHEMIST 2767 — 4372 10% Market Adjust Revised October 16, 2000 Page 2 of 10 U-5 LIMP MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS B98 SR CHEMIST 3203 — 5061 10% Market Adjust C07 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPEC 3051 — 4821 5% Market Adjust C09 VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR 2509 -- 3964 5% Market Adjust CIO ACCOUNTANT 2509 — 3964 C 12 SR ACCOUNTANT 3051 — 4821 C 14 AUDITOR 2767 — 4372 C16 SR AUDITOR 3051 — 4821 C18 RECORDS ANALYST 2509 --- 3964 New Class C21 RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYST 2767 — 4372 5% Market Adjust C23 SR RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYST 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust C25 HRI SPECIALIST 3051 -- 5187 5% Market Adjust C30 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 3708 — 5859 1.0% Market Adjust C34 ASST CITY ATTORNEY 4087 —6457 10% Mrkt/Title Change C36 SR ASST CITY ATTORNEY 4732 — 7477 10% Mrkt/Title Change C41 FIRE PROTECTION SPECIALIST 3708 — 5859 Title Change C43 GRADUATE ENGINEER 3203 — 5061 5% Market Adjust C45 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 3708 — 5859 5% Market Adjust C49 SR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 4292 — 6781 5% Market Adjust C51 REGISTERED ARCHITECT 3363 — 5314 5% Market Adjust C53 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2905 — 4590 5% Market Adjust C55 SR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 3203 — 5061 New Class C57 PLANNER 2767 ---- 4372 C59 SR PLANNER 3531 — 5579 C61 COMMUNITY COUNSELOR 2767 -- 4372 5% Market Adjust C72 FORENSIC SCIENTIST 3203 — 5061 10% Market Adjust C74 SR FORENSIC SCIENTIST 3708 — 5859 10% Market Adjust C76 POLICE PSYCHOLOGIST 4292 — 6781 C81 INFO SYS TECH SUPPORT ANALYST 1 2767 — 4704 C83 INFO SYS TECH SUPPORT ANALYST II 3051 — 5187 C84 SR INFO SYS TECH SUPPORT ANALYST 3531 — 6003 C85 INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYST 1 2635 4480 5% Market Adjust C87 INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYST 11 3051 — 5187 5% Market Adjust C89 SR INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYST 3531 6003 5% Market Adjust C92 LAKE WORTH COORDINATOR 3203 — 5061 15% Market Adjust C94 UTILITY RATE ANALYST 2635 — 4163 10% Market Adjust C96 SR UTILITY RATE ANALYST 3363 — 5314 10% Market Adjust DO1 BUSINESS DIVERSITY MANAGER 4292 — 6781 5% Market Adjust D02 ASSISTANT TO THE MAYOR 3051 4821 5% Market Adjust D03 ACTION CENTER MANAGER 3051 — 4821 D04 ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION MGR 4507 — 7121 5% Market Adjust D05 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COORD 3708 — 5859 5% Market Adjust D07 M/WBE PROGRAM COORDINATOR 3708 — 5859 5% Market Adjust D10 BUDGET MANAGER 4507 -- 7121 5% Market Adjust D12 CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER 4087 —6457 D14 CITY TREASURER 4087 —6457 D 16 PURCHASING MANAGER 4087— 6457 5% Market Adjust D18 RECORDS MANAGER 3893 — 6151 5% Mrkt/20% Range D20 RISK MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR 3708 5859 5% Market Adjust D21 SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 3708 — 5859 5% Market Adjust D22 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MGR 3363 — 5314 D23 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 4087— 6457 5% Market Adjust Revised October 16, 2000 Page 3 of 10 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS D24 SR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MGR. 4087 — 6457 New Class D25 UTILITY ADMINISTRATOR 3531 — 5579 D27 CONTRACT SERVICES ADMIN 3531 — 5579 D29 HOUSING PROGRAM MANAGER 4292 --- 6781 D30 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 6342 — 10020 10% Mrkt /Title Change D32 ASST BUILDING OFFICIAL 3531 -- 5579 5% Market Adjust D36 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMIN 4292 — 6781 D38 CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPT 4292 -- 6781 5% Market Adjust D40 REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 3893 — 6151 New Class D41 BUILDING SERVICES SUPT 4292 -- 6781 5% Market Adjust D42 EQUIPMENT SERVICES SUPT 4292 — 6781 10% Market Adjust D44 FIELD OPERATIONS SUPT 3531 -- 5579 10% Market Adjust D45 ENGINEERING MANAGER 4732 — 7477 5% Market Adjust D46 SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT 3708 -- 5859 D47 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER 4969 -- 7851 5% Market Adjust D48 TRAFFIC SERVICES SUPT 3893 — 6151 5% Market Adjust D49 STREETS & LIGHTS SUPT 4292 -- 6781 5% Market Adjust D50 CONSUMER HEALTH MANAGER 3893 — 6151 D52 HEALTH INFO ASSMT MANAGER 3893 -- 6151 Reclassed D54 HEALTH OUTREACH MANAGER 3893 — 6151 New Class D56 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGER 4087 — 6457 15% Market Increase D58 PLANNING MANAGER 3893 — 6151 New Class D60 ANIMAL CONTROL MANAGER 3363 — 5314 5% Market Adjust D61 DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT 3708 5859 D62 GOLF OPERATIONS MANAGER 4292 — 6781 5% Mrkt & 5% Range D63 PLANNING AND RESOURCE MANAGER 4292 --- 6781 Deleted Class D64 COMMUNITY OPERATIONS MANAGER 4292 — 6781 New Class D65 HORTICULTURE SUPERINTENDENT 4292 — 6781 5% Market Adjust D66 PRO SHOP SUPERINTENDENT 3893 — 6151 5% Market Adjust D67 COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER 3893 — 6151 D68 HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR 3708 — 5859 5% Market Adjust D69 LIBRARIAN MANAGER 3893 — 6151 5% Market Adjust D70 CHIEF HELICOPTER PILOT 3531 --- 5579 D72 PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT MANAGER 4087 — 6457 D74 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COORD 3708 -- 5859 D76 AIRPORT MANAGER 3708 — 5859 D79 PUBLIC EVENTS MANAGER 3203 — 5061 D80 HUMAN RELATIONS MANAGER 3893 --- 6151 5% Market Adjust D81 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGER 4087 — 6948 5% Market Adjust D83 SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS MANAGER 4087 — 6948 5% Market Adjust D85 TECHNICAL SERVICES MANAGER 4087 — 6948 D87 TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES MGR 4732 — 7477 10% Market Adjust D89 CABLE SERVICES MANAGER 3363 — 5314 5% Market Adjust D90 REGULATORY/ENVIRONMENTAL COORD 4087 — 6457 15% Market Adjust D92 CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER Deleted Class D94 WATER SERVICES MANAGER Deleted Class D96 WATER SYSTEMS SUPERINTENDENT 4087 — 6457 10% Market Adjust D98 WATER QUALITY MANAGER 4087 — 6457 10% Market Adjust E10 ASST CITY SECRETARY 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E12 ASST FINANCE DIRECTOR 5036 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E16 ASST CITY AUDITOR 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range [revised October 16, 2000 Page 4 of 10 U-7 N] MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS E25 ASST HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E30 CLERK OF MUNICIPAL COURT 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E31 CITY MARSHAL 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E34 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY Deleted Class E41 ASST CITY SERVICES DIRECTOR 5539 — 9139 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E43 BUILDING OFFICIAL 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E45 ASST ENGINEERING DIRECTOR 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E47 ASST HOUSING DIRECTOR 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E49 ASST TRANS/PUBLIC WORKS DIR 5539 — 9139 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E50 ASST HEALTH DIRECTOR 5539 — 9139 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E57 ASST PLANNING DIRECTOR 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E60 ASST PARKS/COMMUNITY SERV DIR 5539 — 9139 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E74 ASST PUB FACIL/EVENTS MRKTNG DIR 4029 — 6648 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E78 ASST PUBLIC FAC/EVENTS DIRECTOR 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E80 ASST ISS DIRECTOR -OPERATIONS 5539 — 9139 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E81 ASST ISS DIRECTOR -BUSINESS SERVICES 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E83 ASST LIBRARIES DIRECTOR 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E90 ASST WATER DIRECTOR 5539 — 9139 5% Mrkt & 5% Range E92 DEPUTY WATER DIRECTOR 5724 — 10418 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F01 ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER 4029 -- 6648 5% Mrkt && 5% Range F03 SR ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER 5036 — 8309 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F05 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 7617 — 12568 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F08 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Deleted Class F09 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 5724 — 10418 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F14 FINANCE DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range 1721 RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR 5724 — 10418 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F25 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F30 MUNICIPAL COURT SERVICES DIR 5724 — 10418 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F36 HUMAN RELATIONS DIRECTOR 5724 — 10418 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F41 CITY SERVICES DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F43 DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F45 ENGINEERING DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F47 HOUSING DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F49 TRANSPORTATION/PUBLIC WORKS DIR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F50 PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F56 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIR 5724 — 10418 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F57 PLANNING DIRECTOR 5724 — 10418 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F60 PARKS/COMMUNITY SERVICES DIR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F70 POLICE CHIEF 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F72 FIRE CHIEF 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F76 AIRPORT SYSTEMS DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F78 PUBLIC FACILITIES/EVENTS DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F80 IT SOLUTIONS DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F83 LIBRARIES DIRECTOR 6296 —11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range F90 WATER DIRECTOR 6296— 11459 5% Mrkt & 5% Range GO1 WD PROGRAM MANAGER 3708 — 5859 New Class G02 WEB MANAGING EDITOR 3363 — 5314 New Class G04 TEEN COURT COORDINATOR 2509 3964 New Class G06 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORD 3363 — 5314 5% Market Adjust G07 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COORDINATOR 3363 — 5314 5% Market Adjust GI0 ACCOUNTING SERVICES SUPERVISOR 3363 5314 Revised October 16, 2000 Page 5 Of 10 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS G 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUPERVISOR 2635 — 4163 G14 DEPUTY CITY TREASURER 3363 — 5314 G16 CONTRACT COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR 3203 — 5061 G18 PURCHASING SUPERVISOR 2905 -- 4590 5% Market Adjust G19 ASST RETIREMENT FUND ADMIN 3708 — 5859 G21 AUDIT PROJECT SUPERVISOR 3363 — 5314 G29 HOUSING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 3203 — 5061 G32 PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAM COORD 3051 — 4821 5% Market Adjust G34 GROUND TRANSPORTATION COORD 3531 — 5579 New Class G36 VICTIM ASSISTANCE COORDINATOR 3363 — 53I4 5% Market Adjust G38 REPROGRAPHICS COORDINATOR 2767 — 4372 G40 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORD 3203 — 5061 10% Range Adjust G41 ASST BUILDING SERVICES SUPT 3531 -- 5579 10% Market Adjust G43 ASST EQUIPMENT SERVICES SUPT 3708 — 5859 20% Market Adjust G45 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SUPV 3531 5579 5% Market Adjust G47 ASST SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT 3363 — 5314 G48 ASST TRAFFIC SERVICES SUPT 3531 — 5579 10% Market Adjust G49 ASST STREETS AND LIGHTS SUPT 3531 — 5579 10% Market Adjust G50 CONSUMER HEALTH SUPERVISOR 3363 — 5314 5% Range Adjust G51 HEALTH OUTREACH COORDINATOR 3363 — 5314 G52 EPIDEMIOLOGY COORDINATOR 3363 — 5314 G54 LABORATORY SUPERVISOR 3531 5579 10% Market Adjust G56 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPERVISOR 3708 —5859 15% Market Adjust G61 NATURE CENTER SUPERVISOR 2905 — 4590 10% Market Adjust G62 COMMUNITY CENTER COORDINATOR 3203 -- 5061 5% Market Adjust G63 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SUPERVISOR 3708 — 5859 5% Mrkt & 5% Range G64 ATHLETIC COORDINATOR 2390 ---- 3776 5% Market Adjust G65 CITY FORESTER 3531 — 5579 10% Market Adjust G67 HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATOR 3051 — 4821 5% Market Adjust G68 HUMAN SERVICES SUPERVISOR 3051 — 4821 5% Market Adjust G69 REGIONAL LIBRARIAN SUPERVISOR 3531 — 5579 5% Market Adjust G70 LIBRARIAN SUPERVISOR 3363 5314 5% Market Adjust G71 CRIME LAB SUPERVISOR 4087 — 6457 10% Mrkt & Title Chng G72 ASST PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT MGR 3363 --- 5314 10% Market Adjust G81 INFORMATION SYSTEMS COORD 3531 — 6003 5% Market Adjust G83 TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS COOR 3363 - 5717 10% Market Adjust G86 IT SOLUTIONS ADMINISTRATOR 3893 — 6618 New Class G89 CABLE SERVICES SUPERVISOR 2635 — 4163 5% Market Adjust G90 WATER SERVICES SUPERVISOR 3051 — 4821 J03 OFFICE ASSISTANT I 1496 — 2112 J05 OFFICE ASSISTANT 11 1571 — 2216 J 10 LEGAL SECRETARY 2004 — 2826 J12 ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 1909----2694 J14 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1818 — 2565 J 16 EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 2105 — 2970 J18 EXEC SECRETARY TO MAYOR/COUNCIL 2321 — 3273 Title Change J21 ACCOUNT CLERK 1731 — 2441 5% Market Adjust J23 ACCOUNT TECHNICIAN 2004 — 2826 5% Market Adjust J30 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 1 1571 — 2216 J32 CUSTOMER SERVICE REP 1I 1649 — 2326 J33 CUSTOMER SERVICE INFO SPECIALIST 2004 2826 Revised October 16, 2000 Page 6 Of 10 U-9 UW10 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS J34 FIELD SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE 1818 — 2565 J41 STOCK CLERK 1649 2326 5% Market Adjust J43 PROPERTY CONTROL SPECIALIST 1818 —2565 5% Market Adjust J45 PARTS EXPEDITER 1818 -- 2565 5% Market Adjust J47 DISPATCHER 1571 — 2216 J50 COMMUNITY HEALTH AIDE 1571 — 2216 J70 DECOR TECHNICIAN 1731 — 2441 New Class J81 RETAIL SALES ATTENDANT 1571 — 2216 J83 LIBRARY PAGE 1425 — 2012 K01 MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT 2004— 2826 5% Market Adjust K02 ADMIN ASST TO CITY MANAGER 2821— 3979 New Class K03 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 2321 — 3273 5% Market Adjust K05 COURT REPORTER 2437 — 3437 K07 JURY COORDINATOR 2321 — 3273 5% Market Adjust K08 COURT INTERPRETER 1909 — 2694 K09 PARALEGAL 2437 — 3437 10% Market Adjust K10 HUMAN SERVICES SPECIALIST 2210 — 3117 5% Market Adjust K12 GRAPHIC ARTIST 2321 — 3273 K14 PLANNING ASSISTANT 2004 --- 2826 K16 ASSOCIATE PLANNER 2210 — 3117 K20 ELIGIBILITY SPECIALIST 1909 — 2694 K23 HOUSING REHABILITATION TECH 1 2105 — 2970 K25 HOUSING REHABILITATION TECH 11 2321 --- 3273 K26 LOAN SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE 2210 — 31 17 K27 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 1 2321 — 3273 K29 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 11 2686 — 3789 K30 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I 2004 — 2826 K32 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 11 2321 — 3273 K34 PLANS EXAMINER 2686 -- 3789 K38 DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR 2559 — 3610 K40 SURVEY TECHNICIAN 1818 — 2565 K42 GRANTS SPECIALIST 2437 — 3437 New Class K46 UTILITY LINE TECHNICIAN 2210 — 3117 K48 EQUIPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN 1731 — 2441 10% Market Adjust K55 LABORATORY ASSISTANT 1731 — 2441 K57 LABORATORY ANALYST Deleted Class K60 ASST GOLF PROFESSIONAL 2004 — 2826 5% Market Adjust K62 COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM SPEC Deleted Class K64 VETERINARIAN TECHNICIAN 2105 — 2970 5% Market Adjust K70 HELICOPTER PILOT 2961 — 4177 K81 INFORMATION SYSTEMS OPS SPEC 1818 2565 K83 HELP DESK SPECIALIST 2321 — 3273 K84 SR HELP DESK SPECIALIST 2559 3610 New Class K85 TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 2559 — 3610 10% Market Adjust K88 INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN 1909— 2694 K89 INFORMATION SUPPORT TECHNICIAN 1731 --- 2441 K90 INSTRUMENTATION/ELECT TECH 2437 — 3437 K94 WATER SYSTEMS SAMPLER 1909 2694 10% Market Adjust K96 WATER SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN I 1909 — 2694 K98 WATER SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN 11 2210 — 31 17 NO3 REPROGRAPHICS TECHNICIAN 2004 — 2826 Revised October 16, 2000 Page 7 Of 10 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE _ RANGE COMMENTS N07 INDUSTRIAL SEWING TECHNICIAN 1909 — 2694 5% Market Adjust N 12 COURIER 1909 — 2694 5% Market Adjust N 14 PROPERTY CONTROL ATTENDANT 1731 — 2441 5% Market Adjust N20 MAINTENANCE WORKER 1731 --- 2441 N23 CUSTODIAN 1571 — 2216 N25 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1818 -- 2565 N30 TRAFFIC SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN 1 1909 — 2694 10% Market Adjust N32 TRAFFIC SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN II 2321 — 3273 10% Market Adjust N33 TRAFFIC SERVICES WORKER 1731 — 2441 N35 SIGNS FABRICATOR 1731 — 2441 N41 LANDFILL SCALE OPERATOR 1571 — 2216 N45 SKILLED TRADES TECHNICIAN I 2105 — 2970 Title Change N46 SKILLED TRADES TECHNICIAN lI 2321 — 3273 New Class N47 EQUIPMENT SERVICES MECHANIC 1 1909 — 2694 10% Market Adjust N49 EQUIPMENT SERVICES MECHANIC 11 2210 3117 10% Market Adjust N52 AUTO BODY REPAIRER 2105 — 2970 10% Market Adjust N54 WELDER Deleted Class N55 COMMUNITY CENTER AIDE 1731 — 2441 N56 GARDENER 1909 — 2694 N58 GREENHOUSE ATTENDANT 1909 — 2694 N61 ARBORIST 1731 — 2441 N63 ANIMAL SHELTER ATTENDANT 1731 — 2441 N65 ZOO KEEPER 2004 — 2826 5% Market Adjust N68 DROVER 1909 — 2694 5% Market Adjust N69 PESTICIDE APPLICATOR 1909 — 2694 N70 HELICOPTER MECHANIC 2961 -- 4177 N78 PUBLIC EVENTS ATTENDANT 1649 — 2326 N79 STAGEHAND 2105 2970 5% Market Adjust N80 AUDIO/VISUAL SPECIALIST 1818 — 2565 N88 WATER METER READER 1649 — 2326 N90 METER SERVICES TECHNICIAN 1649 — 2326 N92 CROSS CONNECTION TECHNICIAN 2321 — 3273 N94 WATER SYSTEMS MECHANIC I 1909 -- 2694 N96 WATER SYSTEMS MECHANIC It 2210 — 3117 001 MAYOR $75 a Meeting 002 MAYOR PRO TEM $75 a Meeting 003 CITY COUNCIL MEMBER $75 a Meeting P05 SR REPROGRAPHICS TECHNICIAN 2321 3273 P 14 SR CUSTOMER SERVICES REP 1818 — 2565 P21 SR MAINTENANCE WORKER 1818 --- 2565 P23 SR ACCOUNT CLERK 1909 --- 2694 5% Market Adjust P25 SR ACCOUNT TECHNICIAN 2210 — 3117 5% Market Adjust P27 SR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 1909 -- 2694 P29 SR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 2961 — 4177 P30 ASST PARTS/MATERIALS SUPV 2105 — 2970 5% Market Adjust P32 SR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 2686 — 3789 P36 SR PLANS EXAMINER 2961 — 4177 P41 EQUIPMENT SERVICES CREWLEADER 2821 — 3979 10% Market Adjust P43 FIELD OPERATIONS CREWLEADER 2105 — 2970 5% Market Adjust P45 SR SURVEY TECHNICIAN 2210 --- 3117 P47 SR SKILLED TRADES TECHNICIAN 2559 — 3610 Range Adjustment Revised October 16, 2000 Page 8 of 10 U-11 U-12 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE P50 P52 P56 P67 P68 P70 P74 P76 P78 P81 P83 P87 P94 P96 P98 RJI RJ3 RJ5 RJ7 RJ9 RK I RK3 RK5 RM 1 RM3 RP 1 RP3 RP5 SO1 S02 S03 SO4 S05 S06 S08 Sil S99 W07 W09 W12 W13 W15 W17 W20 W22 W30 W32 W40 W50 W 60 W62 SR EQUIPMENT SERVICES MECHANIC TRAFFIC SYSTEMS CREWLEADER SR GARDENER SR ZOO KEEPER TOP HAND SR DECOR TECHNICIAN SR PROPERTY CONTROL SPECIALIST STAGEHAND CREWLEADER PUBLIC EVENTS COORDINATOR CUSTODIAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR SR INFORMATION SYSTEMS OPS SPEC SR TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECH SR INSTRUMENTATION/ELECT TECH SR WATER SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN SR WATER SYSTEMS MECHANIC WD CUSTOMER SERVICE REP WD UNIT SECRETARY WD SECRETARY WD BOOKKEEPER WD EXECUTIVE SECRETARY WD ELIGIBILITY SPECIALIST WD MIS SPECIALIST WD COMPUTER TECHNICIAN WD PROGRAM MANAGER WD PROGRAM SUPERVISOR WD JOB DEVELOPER WD SPECIALIST WD ACCOUNTANT EXTRA HELP SCOREKEEPER ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL ADULT FLAG FOOTBALL OFFICIAL ADULT VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL YOUTH GAME OFFICIAL SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD PUBLIC SAFETY CADET DEPUTY CITY MARSHAL SR DEPUTY CITY MARSHAL PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATOR i PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATOR II SR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATOR ASST COMMUNICATION SHIFT SUPV CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TRAFFIC CONTROL TECHNICIAN TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR SECURITY GUARD ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER HORSE TRAINER INDENTIFICATION TECHNICIAN Revised October 16, 2000 COMMENTS 2559 — 3610 10% Market Adjust 2686 — 3789 10% Market Adjust 2105 -- 2970 2321 — 3273 5% Market Adjust 2437 -- 3437 5% Market Adjust 1909 — 2694 New Class 2004 — 2826 5% Market Adjust 2437 — 3437 5% Market Adjust 2437 — 3437 2004 -- 2826 2210 — 3117 2821 — 3979 10% Market Adjust 2686 — 3789 2559 — 3610 2437 — 3437 Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Deleted Classification Varies by Classification 1127 1907 2600 2253 2080 2080 1 170 Rate Adjustment 1560 2437 3437 5% Market Adjust 2821 — 3979 5% Market Adjust 2004 — 2826 10% Market Adjust 2321 3273 10% Market Adjust 2686 — 3789 10% Market Adjust 2961 — 4177 10% Market Adjust 2437 -- 3437 5% Market Adjust 2821 — 3979 5% Market Adjust 1731 2441 10% Market Adjust 2559 — 3610 10% Market Adjust 1818 — 2565 10% Market Adjust 2004 — 2826 5% Market Adjust 2004 — 2826 5% Market Adjust 1909 -- 2694 Page 9 of 10 MONTHLY SALARY KEY CLASS TITLE RANGE COMMENTS W64 INTOXILYZER OPERATOR 1909 — 2694 W66 LATENT FINGERPRINT EXAMINER 2210 — 3117 W68 POLICE RANGE TECHNICIAN 1818 — 2565 W70 POLYGRAPH EXAMINER 2437 -- 3437 X03 POLICE OFFICER 3046 — 4499 6% ATB X04 POLICE CORPORAL 3891 — 4967 6% ATB X07 POLICE SERGEANT 4503 — 5473 6% ATB X08 POLICE LIEUTENANT 4966 — 6036 6% ATB X09 POLICE CAPTAIN 5749 — 6655 6% ATB X10 POLICE DEPUTY C141EF 6631 — 7677 6% ATB X 17 POLICE TRAINEE 2400 Y01 FIRE FIGHTER 3090 — 3944 6% ATB Y02 FIRE ENGINEER 3972 — 4380 6% ATB Y03 FIRE LIEUTENANT 4626 — 4857 6% ATB Y04 FIRE CAPTAIN 5183 — 5442 6% ATB Y05 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF 5666 — 6246 6% ATB Y1 1 FIRE DEPUTY CHIEF 6728 — 7417 6% ATB Y17 FIRE TRAINEE 2400 Revised October 16, 2000 Page 10 Of 10 U-13 V-1 GLOSSARY The Annual Budget and Program Objectives contains specialized and technical terminology that is unique to public finance and budgeting. To help the reader of this document understand these terms, a budget glossary has been included in the document. Account: A six -digit numerical code of which the first character defines the specific classification of dollar values in the financial records, i.e., assets, liabilities, equities, revenues and expend itureslexpense. The remaining digits provide a further breakdown of account types into specific character and object groupings. Accrual Accountinq: A basis of accounting in which revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned and become measurable, and expenses are recognized in the period incurred instead of when cash is actually received or spent. For example, in accrual accounting, revenue that was earned between April 1 and June 30, but for which payment was not received until July 10, is recorded as being received on June 30 rather than July 10. Appropriation: A legal authorization made by the City Council that permits the City to make expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes. An appropriation is usually limited in amount and the time which it may be expended. Appropriation Ordinance: The official enactment by the City Council to establish legal authority for City officials to obligate and expend resources. Assessed Valuation: A value that is established for real or personal property for use as a basis for levying property taxes. (Note: Property values are established by the Tarrant Appraisal District.) Audit: A comprehensive examination as to the manner in which the government's resources were actually utilized, concluding in a written report of the findings. A financial audit is a review of the accounting system and financial information to determine how government funds were spent and whether expenditures were in compliance with the legislative body's appropriations. A performance audit consists of a review of how well the organization met its stated goals. Authorized Position (A.P.): A position included in the adopted budget document, authorized by the City Council as part of the total authorized strength of a department. Positions are specifically approved by designated classification titles and corresponding salary level, based on an analysis by the Human Resources Department of the tasks to be performed. Balance Sheet: A financial statement that discloses the assets, liabilities, and equity of a specific governmental fund as of a specific date. Bond: An interest -bearing certificate of debt; a written contract by an issuer to pay to the lender a fixed principal amount on a stated future date, and a series of interest payments on the principal amount until it is paid. Budget: A financial plan for a specified period of time (fiscal year) that includes all planned expenditures for various municipal services and the proposed means of financing them. 1AK Budqet Adiustment: A legal procedure utilized during the fiscal year by the City staff and City Council to revise a budget appropriation. The City of Fort Worth's City Charter requires City Council approval through the adoption of a supplemental appropriation ordinance (which specifies both the source of revenue and the appropriate expenditure account) for any interdepartmental or interfund adjustments. City staff has the prerogative to adjust expenditures within a departmental budget. Budqet Calendar: The schedule of key dates or milestones, which the City departments follow in the preparation, adoption, and administration of the budget. Budqet Document: The instrument used by the City Staff to present a comprehensive financial program to the City Council. Budqet Message: The opening section of the budget that provides the City Council and the public with a general summary of the most important aspects of the budget, changes from the current and previous fiscal years, and the views and recommendations of the City Manager, The Budget Message is also referred to as the City Manager's transmittal letter. Budqetary Control: The control or management of a governmental unit or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. Budqeted Funds: Funds that are planned for certain uses but have not yet been formally or legally appropriated by the legislative body, The budget document that is submitted for City Council approval is comprised of budgeted funds. Capital Equipment Budqet: The portion of the annual operating budget that appropriates funds for the purchase of capital equipment items. These expenditures are often separated from regular operating items, such as salaries, services, and supplies. The Capital Equipment Budget includes funds for capital equipment purchases, which are usually distinguished from operating items according to their value and projected useful life. Examples include vehicles, furniture, machinery, building improvements, and special tools. The dollar value varies according to the policy established by each jurisdiction. For the City of Fort Worth, this limit is $5, 000. Capital Improvement Proqram: A plan for capital expenditures to provide long-lasting physical improvements to be incurred over a fixed period of several future years. Capital Improvement Proqram Budqet: A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget is a separate budget from the operating budget. Items in the CIP are usually construction projects designed to improve the value of the government assets. Examples of capital improvement projects include new roads, sewer lines, buildings, recreational facilities, and large scale remodeling. The City Council receives a separate document that details the CIP costs for the upcoming fiscal year. Cash Accountinq: A basis of accounting in which transactions are recorded when cash is either received or expended for goods and services. V-3 Cash Balance: Cash on hand and cash equivalents at any point in time, net of inflows and outflows. Cash Management: The management of cash necessary to pay for government services while investing temporary cash excesses in order to earn interest revenue. Cash management refers to the activities of forecasting the inflows and outflows of cash, mobilizing cash to improve its availability for investment, establishing and maintaining banking relationships, and investing funds in order to achieve the highest interest and return available for temporary cash balances. Center: A numerical code that details financial responsibility for revenue and expenditures. The center specifically shows the department -division -section for operating funds, department -fund - project for bond funds, and department -project for grants and other capital project funds. Character: A basis for distinguishing types of expenditures; the five major characters used by the City of Fort Worth are: personal services-09 , supplies-02, contractual services-03, capital outlays-04, and debt service-05. Commitment: The pledge of appropriated funds to purchase an item or service. Funds are committed when a requisition is issued through the Purchasing Division of the City. Current Taxes: Taxes that are levied and due within one year. Debt Service: The City's obligation to pay the principal and interest of all bonds and other debt instruments according to a pre -determined payment schedule. Delinquent Taxes: Taxes that remain unpaid on and after the date due, on which a penalty for nonpayment is attached. Department: A major administrative division of the City that indicates overall management responsibility for an operation or group of related operations within a functional area. Depreciation: The process of estimating and recording the lost usefulness or expired useful life from a fixed asset that cannot or will not be restored by repair and will be replaced. The cost of the fixed asset's lost usefulness is the depreciation or the cost to reserve in order to replace the item at the end of its useful life. Disbursement: Payment for goods and services in cash or by check. Encumbrance: The commitment of appropriated funds to purchase an item or service. Committed funds become encumbered when a purchasing requisition becomes an actual purchase order. Enterprise Fund: A governmental accounting fund used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the governing body is to recover the cost of providing goods through user fees. Rate schedules for these services are established to insure that revenues are adequate to meet all necessary expenditures. Enterprise funds within the City of Fort Worth are established for services such as water and sewer, parking facilities, airports, solid waste management, and golf courses. V-4 Estimated Revenue: The amount of projected revenue to be collected during the fiscal year. It may also be defined as the proposed financing sources estimated to finance the proposed projected expenditure. Expenditure: Decreases in the use of net financial resources other than through interf'und transfer. Expenses: Outflows or other depletion of assets or incurrence of liabilities during a specific period of time which result from the delivery or production of goods, rendering of services, or carrying out of other activities that constitute the entity's ongoing major central operations. Fiscal Year: The twelve month period to which the annual operating budget applies and at the end of which a government determines its financial position and the results of it operations. The City of Fort Worth's fiscal year is October 1 through September 30. Fixed Assets: Assets of long-term character that are intended to continue to be held or used, such as land, buildings, machinery, furniture, and other equipment. Full Faith and Credit: A pledge of the general taxing power of a government to repay debt obligations (typically used in reference to bonds). Function: a group of related programs crossing organizational (departmental) boundaries and aimed at accomplishing a broad goal or major service. Fund: A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts that records all financial transactions for specific activities of government functions. Seven major fund types and two account groups are commonly used: general fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, capital project funds, enterprise funds, trust and agency funds, internal service funds, general fixed asset account group, and general long-term debt account group. Fund Balance: The difference between a fund's assets and its liabilities. Portions of the fund balance may be reserved for various purposes, such as contingencies or encumbrances. General Fund: The largest fund within the City that accounts for all financial resources of the government except for those required to be accounted for in another fund. General Fund revenues include property taxes, licenses and permits, local taxes, service charges, and other types of revenue. This fund usually includes most of the basic operating services, such as fire and police protection, finance, public health, parks and community services, libraries, public works and general administration. General Ledqer: A file that contains a listing of the various accounts necessary to reflectthe financial position and results of governmental operations. General Obliqation Bonds: Bonds that finance a variety of public projects such as streets, buildings, and improvements. The repayment of these bonds is usually made from the General Fund, and these bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the issuing government. v-5 Grant: A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function. Grants may be classified as either categorical or block depending upon the amount of discretion allowed to the grantee. Interfund Transfers: Amounts transferred from one fund to another. Intergovernmental Revenue: Revenue received from another governmental entity for a specified purpose. In Fort Worth, these are funds from TarrantCounty, the State of Texas, and through recovery of indirect costs from federal and state agencies. Internal Service Fund: A fund used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department to another department on a cost reimbursement basis. Examples of some of these funds are as follows: the Office Services Fund, the Equipment Services Fund, the Temporary Labor Fund, and the Information Systems Fund, Inventory: A detailed listing of property currently held by the government showing quantities, descriptions and values of the property, units of measure, and unit prices. Invoice: A bill requesting payment for goods or services by a vendor or other governmental unit. Levy: To impose taxes, special assessments, or service charges for the support of City activities. Line -Item Budqet: A budget that lists each expenditure category (salary, materials, telephone service, travel, etc.) separately along with the dollar amount budgeted for each specified q category. Lonq-Term Debt: Any unmatured debt that is not a fund liability and at the same time has a maturity of more than one year. Modified Accrual Accountinq: A basis of accounting in which revenues should be recognized in the accounting period in which they become available and measurable and expenditures are recorded in the accounting period that they are incurred. Since this type of accounting basis is a conservative financial approach, it is recommended as the standard for most governmental funds. Operatinq Budqet: The portion of the budget that pertains to daily operations that provide basic governmental services. The operating budget contains appropriations for such expenditures as personnel, supplies, utilities, materials, travel, and fuel and the proposed means of financing them. Operatinq Fund: A fund restricted to a fiscal budget year. A Performance Budqet: A budget that focuses upon activities rather than line items. Workload and unit cost data are collected in order to assess the efficiency of services. Typical data collected might include miles of streets paved per year, cost of paved streets per mile, tons of garbage collected per employee hour, or cost per employee hour of garbage collection. V-6 Performance Measures: Specific quantitative and qualitative measures of work performed as an objective of the department. Program Budget: a budget that focuses upon the goal and objectives of an agency or jurisdiction rather than upon its organizational budget units or object classes or expenditures. Property Tax: Property taxes are levied on both real and personal property according to the property's valuation and the tax rate. Reconciliation: A detailed analysis of changes in revenue or expenditure balances within a fund. Requisition: A written request from a department to the purchasing office for specific goods or services. This action precedes the authorization of a purchase order. Reserve: An account used to indicate that a portion of a fund's balance is legally restricted for a specific purpose and is, therefore, not available for general appropriations. Retained Earninqs: The difference between assets and liabilities for enterprise and internal service funds. Revenue: Increases in the net current assets of a governmental fund type from other than expenditure refunds and residual equity transfers, and increases in net total assets of a proprietary fund type from other than expense refunds, capital contributions and residual equity transfers. Included are such items as tax payments, fees from specific services, receipts from other governments, fines, forfeitures, grants, shared revenues, and interest income. Revenue Bonds: Bonds usually sold for constructing a project that will produce revenue for the government. All or part of the revenue is used to pay the principle and interest of the bond. Risk Manaqement: An organized attempt to protect a government's assets against accidental loss, utilizing the most economical methods. Source of Revenue: Revenues are classified according to their source or point of origin. Unencumbered Balance: The amount of an appropriation that is neither expended nor encumbered. It is essentially the amount of money still available for future purchases. Voucher: A document indicating that a transaction has occurred. It usually specifies the accounts related to the transaction.