HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 4184 ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3011, BEING AN
ORDINANCE TO REGULATE AND RESTRICT THE LOCATION AND
USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, AND LAND FOR TRADE,
INDUSTRY, RESIDENCE, OR. OTHER PURPOSES, THE HEIGHT,
NUMBER OF STORIES AND SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER
STRUCTURES, THE SIZE OF YARDS AND OTHER OPEN SPACES
OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING AND THE DENSITY OF
POPULATION; AND FOR SAID PURPOSES TO DIVIDE THE
MUNICIPALITY INTO DISTRICTS OF SUCH NUMBER, SHAPE,
AND AREA AS MAY BE DEE14ED BEST BY FIXING EEFINITE
USES OF THE BUILDINGS HEREINAFTER ERECTED IN SAID
DESCRIBED AREAS FROM THE USES AS SHOWN ON THE MAPS
CONTAINED IN SAID ORDINANCE NO. 3011; PRESCRIBING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN
$5.00 NOR MORE THAN $200.00 FOR EACH OFFENSE,.AND
THAT EACH DAY THAT A VIOLATION IS PERMITTED TO EXIST
SHALL CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE OFFENSE; AND NAMING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 3011 be amended so that the following described uses in
the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as follows to wit:
AREAS FROM TO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-Z-76: Lots 20-A, 20-B and the East 50
feet of'Lots 20 and 21, Handley
Heights Addition "A" "E"
(6500 block of Meadowbrook Drive)
No. 59-Z-84: A portion of Tract 2" (City Tag
Records), David Strickland Survey:
Being Lot 2, Block 4, of E1 Lago Addition, per
preliminary subdivision plat approved by City
Plan Commission, August 12, 1959 "B" "F'-R"
(5000 block Proposed Arlington Lake Shore Drive)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-Z-65: Lots 20 and 21, Block 61, Rosen
Heights, First Filing "B" "E"
(2700 block of Columbus Avenue)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59�Z-91: Lots 51 6 and 7, Block 59, M. G.
Ellis Addition "B" "E"
(2800 block Ellis Avenue - west side of street)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
G J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 2: Lots 1 through 12, Woods Addition "B" "E"
5400 block Ramey Avenue - north side of Street)
No. 59-Z-93: The West 963.E feet of Tract 1 B,
(City Tax Records) W. H. Little
Survey (Greenway Park) less R.O.W. for proposed
North-South Freeway; and the residue of Tracts
9 and 10 (City Tax Records) W. H. Little Survey "A" & "J" "K"
(1700 thru 2000 blocks E. Belknap and Pharr
Streets at Gilvin Street and proposed North-
South Freeway)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-Z-91x: The residue of Lots 1 and 2, Block
1, Eastland Subdivision, except
the North 50 feet "A" HER
(2600 block Tierney Road at E. Lancaster)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-Z-95: Lot 14t-1, Block 21; Carver
Heights Addition "A" "E"
(6100 block Ramey Avenue - south side of the street)
No. 59-Z-97: The residue of Lot B, John C. Roberts
Subdivision "B" "E"
(2600 block of Roseland Street)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-Z-97= Lot C, John C. Roberts Subdivision "B" "A"
(2600 block of Roseland Street)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No. 59-+Z-- : Block 15, Highland Humes Addition *F.R" "F"
(U. S. Highway No. 377 at Marquita)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SECTION 2.
The zoning regulations and districts, as herein established, have been made
in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety,
morals, and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed to lessen
congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; to
provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue
concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, parks and other public requirements. They have been made with
reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the districts and
its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the
value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the
community.
SECTION 3.
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of
Fort Worth affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said
ordinance except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in
direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION k.
Should any section, clause or provision of this ordinance be declared by
the Court to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance
as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so-declared to be invalid.
SECTION 5.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects
or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions
of this ordinance shall be fined not less than Five and No/100 Dollars (45.00) nor
more than Two Hundred and NoAOO Dollars ($200.00) for each offense. Each diq
that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 6.
This Ordinance will take effect and be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and publication as required by law.
2,
JWCR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ITY ATTORNEY
Adopted: " 25 1959
c)P_DlmlkwcE -COPY
CITY OF FORT WORTH
ZONING COMMISSION HEARING
AUGUST 18 , 1959
1 : 30 P M .
Area of requested change
12 11 10 „ ` 3 2 I
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Petitioners property
12 11 10 3 2 1 Present zoning classif ication
/ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
- 200 ft. Radius
12 11 10 3 2 1 Signers of petition
I
p0
ti
SCALE: I"= 200' UNLESS NOTED , TOP OF MAP IS NORTH UNLESS NOTED
�-i4-
10 4
Q �=� J. E. 15PRANDOW SURVEY ,
M LAP-dN1g2.00K
11!E �;� ! t9 �^ O a00>
, --- - --�-
'
t 1G { Te -o 'bu PL,
� I
i 246 �
N 0 59awoZ-m 76
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
A"ONE FAMILY RE51DE ITIAL TO _ "C"CORN,ME,ec/qG
G500 31-K. MEADOWiVOOK DR.
EAST SIDE
Recommended _____C Petitioner. J. C. PACE
Denied----------- Percentage of Area : So.G�
Postponed---____.D Scale: ?QO Mop No:s
Remarks
Hearing Dote AUGUST /8, i96-13 Page No.
i
z
�6IC, 0 SUR_.
C 900=�f,_77
1338�F�, v
,L
1y; 005 ` I
LA
{4`' r e,+ r ;\ CITY OF Ap� t V
ac! �
t, f
{ 6 error _
N 0 59-Zftw 8 4
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
",S TWO FAM/L V APES. Tp F2" 'STQ�E-TE/�. COMMEXEC/AL
CA5T OF ME 5000 f3LX. WiPE'V CREST RD
SOUTHEAST
Recommended _____� Petitioner: 4. G. STQ1cA'LA1VD
Denied___________ Percentage of Area : /Oo %
Postponed_______n Scale: /"=?oo' Map No:
Remarks:
Hearing Date ✓ULV Z/, i9S.9. Page No. _
x F r
���---C- 3 1 (• J 3 19 i i
to
it L_14
u _� �•y ,_
ZA
It
,55
\"1 /7 t �J • i'�'��) '5 ice. 1'1 f3 i
� IN t 14 t „ 7_. 14
� ►3 � 1 � {! 1 � f3 F 12 j � t
77
N 0 59001* 8 5 t
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
'a-TWO &AN11L✓QESIIDFIV I14L TO W' COMMERCIAL
2700&B V- COLUM,15U$
A10RrH SIDE-
Recommended _____ Petitioner: M2S. O.E. THONAS
Denied___________ Percentage of Area : 704,.%
Postponed_______E Scale: I2=200' Map No-. A?
Remarks:
Hearing Date JUL1f. 2I,I,959, Page Nio.�.
- r
t
UI TR,4 R 7
tf� WlLu e`� ' (
I ( 2 "5 4 5 G g- 22 21 2
r ZO 1�� R
10 •
i
FZICKE:t,,4 CAI<P? 0 1 ,
14
V`G I 2 r.__, 24 23 22 21 19 18 17 !G IS
Q i 28
t . 4 o , 2721 `J
✓{ 17 �40Q 550p -- --N
F To, T* r 4
^ 2 I Te9b T�9 Tee
TE He
--' 20
TV TO TIL It
z
N ° 59*2"p 9 2
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
B"7WOA4011-V RESIDENT/AL TO E-"COMMERCUL
..fdW f3LK 'AWY AVE. -
• EAST .3/�E
Recommended ____, Petitioner: C•L•W004W
Denied___________(] Percentage of Area : CI.Q W,
Postponed------_D Scale: �`_ Map No =_..82�
Remarks
Hearing Date AuGusr, /-0.59. Page No..
_ • � Z f •
1 <
I _z 7e 6 4y
uj
57�2t-E /
IN
IN
41
\\\�\\ \ \• \ i
OA
ed IQ
% I ,e.0.W
i'Jelan rp SI O��-aass 8 S` S�RL
/NOTE Dji nensions and ACr&aQe From plat by 8rooAvs Bake, �T-
dafed April
I
N 0 59-Z-93
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
:/" LT IAIIDUSTQIAI- and
,LONE FAMILV RE-31DEAITIAL TO "K" HEAVY /IVrJUSTR/AL
NORTH OF /zoo-z000 15LeS. E. ,5ELKNAP.
EAST ,SllJE
Recommended Petitioner: ZOAIIAIG COMMISSION
Denied___________ Percentage of Area
Postponed_______ Scale: /"200r Map No :23,M
Remarks:
Hearing Date AUGUST I8,/9b9. Page No.
kild W.
.. .i : w.
i
14 1 13 ;2
fv
v! Tx,Ca 1 I Co i 00'
Te.7^ Tr r-2 — -----z-
21 22 VFu
2,s I F
V4. �-
N059 Z 94
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
"/3, TWO FAN//L V RES. TO ""E'• C0A4A-fERC/AL
060061K. T/CRNE'V QQ-
EAST .S//JE
Recommended ____ Q Petitioner. EONEV 44 BELL e/cr/
Denied-----------❑ Percentage of Area : 90/
Postponed-_____ Scale: /220 ' Map No:
Remarks:
Hearing Date AUGUST !8,/959. Page No.' 7
t
ai
12
LLJ NA
4r--
& ir-a ; tg
rzj
LLI all
/ _V IL 1s T 14 ; 17 i �t
13 , 14 �y j W �„ 1rB• V • w i
41
GV'' 0 ®� •1 `? Cr�200 AVE
Co100 �LP_ 'tkl 3R1 d 7 I a ! 9 t to f
tOVEPH AD GRADE CRASS]
s
W 1 LI..AF2Q
lecib
� � 7
NO 5 9 5
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
A"ONE PAM/LY RESIDENT/AL TO '"E COMMERCIAL
G/00 6LAl P"EY AVE.
EAST SIDE
Recommended � Petitioner: CONT/MENTAL IDEV. c0lef.
Denied---.------- Percentage of Area : 02.%
Postponed_______-0 Scale: /""-200 Map No:
Remarks:
Hearing Date ,4U6U5T/8,1059. Page No. _
a
P, HAH
Su
��, —�j � �'C��' P. H. A.+�LE 2- SURVEY
n
f
Tcz 3oA OM 4 ! Ttz. 5S•
•
�8• ��01 � 2
A 4�
N 0 59"&Z-97
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
"B"TWO i,4M/L Y PE51D6-AlTG4L TO 'DWARTMENT C F-CWMEeCZAL
2 000 f.3GK RW67L AID
EAST SIDE
Recommended _____p` Petitioner: JOHN C. 2013E2TS
Denied----------- Percentage of Area : G59I
Postponed-----__T] Scale: /"''��" Map No : 81
Remarks:
Hearing Date AUGUST 18, ID5n. Page No._L —
i
i t
2 if
8 s ^ 5 i • 3 12• Z r-
`�' Yfo 13 � t • 4� i1 •� ` � �.. 12
O
7 12 0 • 5 0•++, r
} F i
J�
till
17
t � • O
,(Y- .�..
E'
N059-Z- 98
PROPOSED CHANGE FROM
"F,2" RC,5TR1CTED COMM6eCIAG TO "r."COMMERC/AL
U.S.N/GNWAYN°-577 @ A-14RQU/TA�'RUOY
WZ5—r SIDE
Recommended _____0 Petitioners e/ LEarSOWUNEPeoP.,iMc.
Denied----------- Percentage of Area :
Postponed-------El Scale: i`=zoo' Map No : .sz
Remarks- �EF� 'T't� ��4tGl�..-'r 142 �2-9+�.
Hearing Date AUGUST 1e, 1959. Page No. .,,.