HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 9268 INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 9268
To the Mayor and Members of the City Council June 22, 2010
�T��'°� Page 1 of 1
a
• Subject: AMENDING THE CITY OF FORT WORTH'S ANNEXATION PLAN TO
ADD AN APPROXIMATELY 80-ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED EAST,
SOUTH, AND WEST OF RAY WHITE ROAD AND NORTH OF WALL PRICE
KELLER ROAD
The July 13 City Council agenda will contain an M&C to amend the City's annexation plan in order to
add approximately 80 acres of land for consideration for annexation in 2013. Section 43.052 of the
Texas Local Government Code requires any proposed annexation area with more than 100
residential parcels to be added to the City's annexation plan. This 80-acre tract of land currently
contains 406 residential parcels. The area was originally added to the City's annexation plan on
November 27, 2007, under M&C PZ-2760, referred to as Area 15. When the initial annexation
notices were mailed to the property owners in 2007, several builders owned a large number of lots
instead of individual home owners. Property owners, who bought homes in these newer subdivisions,
were unaware that their properties were subject to annexation proceedings.
Council Member Espino and property owners from the Hillsborough, Lee Ray's Place, and Wilshire Valley
subdivisions agreed that 80 acres should be removed from the City's annexation plan to allow home
owners time to receive adequate notice of annexation proceedings. On March 10, 2009 (M&C PZ-2817),
City Council approved removal of this area from the annexation plan (Area 15-2). Amending the City's
annexation plan to add these subdivisions back allows for annexation in 2013, rather than 2010. State law
requires a one-year waiting period before the same area can be re-introduced to the City's annexation
plan. The City Council may now amend the plan accordingly.
Because the area consists of urban residential subdivisions, no parcels in the enclave have
agricultural exemptions that qualify for development agreements in lieu of annexation. Area 15-2
contains 406 single family lots, and annexation would create a positive impact on the General Fund.
Future capital improvements are required to improve existing local streets.
Staff has determined the City will be able to provide full municipal services upon annexation. To
ensure all new homeowners were aware of the resolution approved by the City Council on March 9,
2009, a copy of the resolution was filed with the deed records of Tarrant County for each lot in the
affected subdivisions. The property owners will receive several notices during the preparation of the
service plan.
Area 15-2 would be an addition to Council District 2. Attached is a PowerPoint for reference. The
fiscal impact analysis is posted on the Planning and Development Department's website.
Should you have any questions, please contact Susan Alanis, Planning and Development Director, at
817-392-8180.
dFisse r, E.
City Manager
Attachment
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF AREA 15-2
ADDITION TO ANNEXATION PLAN
FORTWORTH
Prepared for the
City Council
By the
Planning and Development Department
June 22, 2010
PURPOSE
To review the following items:
,/The City's annexation criteria
✓The City's fiscal impact methodology;
,/The results of fiscal impact analysis for area 15-2
2
1
ANNEXATION CRITERIA
A. Full-Purpose Annexation
Area must meet one or more of the following conditions:
1. Enclave
a. Enclave within City's ETJ 4
b. Ability to provide municipal services _!
2. Urban Development !
a. Development activity of an urban nat "
x.,
b. Ability to provide municipal services
C. Positive fiscal impact analysis i
3. Growth Center
a. Designated growth center
b. Ability to provide municipal services
c. Positive fiscal impact analysis
4. Adverse Impact
a. Adverse impact on City if not annexe
� w
b. Ability to provide municipal services
5. Option to Expand
a. Detriment to City's orderly growth if not annexed 3
b. Ability to provide municipal services
PREPARATION OF
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
A. Revenues c-)7
B. Expenditures ( J)
C. Analysis Timeframe \ `l
D. Per Capita Data Sources 1
E. Population Estimate
F. Methodology
1. Areas with Existing or Proposed Development
2. Other Areas
G. Timing for Preparation of Fiscal Impact
Analysis 4
2
.0
REVENUES
General Fund
1. Property taxes to be generated by existing land
uses, based on Tarrant Appraisal District assessed
values and the City's current property tax rate.
2. Property taxes to be generated by proposed land
uses, based on anticipated assessed values and the
City's current property tax rate.
3. Other General Fund revenues including: Other Local
Taxes, Licenses and Permits, Fines and Forfeitures,
Use of Money and Property, Service Charges, and
Other Revenue, based on a per capita estimate.
5
EXPENDITURES
1. One-time transitional costs, including street signs
and markings, and emergency response set up
2. Required capital improvements for fire service,
roadways and drainage, and water and wastewater
infrastructure
OF
6
.,
3
AREA 15-2
60LDEN TRYUIOLE a , `
• Addition to - ------
Annexation Plan
• 79.7 acres
• Future Land Use
- Single Family .;
• Existing Uses '' r
— Estimated 1,200
residents on 400
lots o.
— 6 vacant lots
HWAM TRACE
ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS
• Single family �+
use
• 285 homestead 15-2
exemptions
• Short term
g rowth
• Property tax -'
revenues
— $496,961 15-2
yearly
8
4
ANALYSIS RESULTS
• Initial Costs
— TPW-$6,500 start up services for residential streets
— Police Department-$40,851 for an estimated 153 service calls
— Code Compliance-$244 for consumer health and animal control
services
• Capital improvements necessary to reconstruct local streets
• Net positive result to the General Fund
max ,
s
What is the proposed schedule?
Date Action
June 22 City Council receives fiscal impact analysis.
July 13 City Council approves resolution to add area
back into Annexation Plan.
Fall 2010 Tarrant County and Fort Worth coordinate
Inventory of Services.
Spring 2011 City Council holds public hearings on the
service plan.
July 2013 City Council institutes and considers
approval of annexation and zoning.
10
5