Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5291 ORDINANCE NO_ 3 z 7/-- AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVID- ING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF (Craig Street +1.ND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CONTRACT TO—__S._H,Q, Construction Comnanv _ FOR THE MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBT- EDNESS,THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESS- MENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS.THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CER- TIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE ESTIMATES; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSE- QUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE FORTIETH LEG- ISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106, COMMONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDI- NANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth, Texas,has prepared Plans and Speci- fications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been examined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all matters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I. The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and adopted. H. There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter described portions of streets, av- enues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, to-wit: 1. Craig Street: From Stark Street to Canton Street, known and designated as Unit No. 1. 2. Craig Street: From Canton Street to Cravens Road; known and designated as Unit No. 2. 3. Canton Street: From East Lancaster Avenue to Craig Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3. n T III Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas,shall be improved by raising,grading,and filling same and by constructing thereon the following,to-wit: 1. Craig Street: From Stark Street to Canton Street, mown and designated as Unit No. 1, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete base with a 1i-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 36-foot roadway. 2. Craig Street: From Canton Street to Cravens Road., known and designated as Unit No. 2, a 6-inch hot-six asphaltic concrete base with a 1i-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 40-foot roadway. 3. Canton Street: From East Lancaster Avenue to Draig Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete base with a li-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 36-foot roadway. The above,together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurten- ances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor. IV. The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as follows, to-wit: A. The property abutting on that.portion of the street, avenue or public place and the real and true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine- tenths (9/10ths) of the estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements. B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said improvements after deduct- ing the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A. The amounts payable by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners thereof and shall constitute a first and prior lien upon such properties and a personal liability of the real and true owners thereof, and shall be payable, to-wit: When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular unit,the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become payable in five (5) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of such completion and acceptance,and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such installments after the date of completion and acceptance of such respective unit.The entire amount assessed against the particular parcels of property shall bear interest from the date of such completion and acceptance of the improvements on the unit upon which the particular property abuts at the rate of six (6%) per cent per annum,payable annually except as to interest on the first installment,which shall be due and payable on the date said installment matures, provided that any owner shall have the right to pay any and all of such installment at any time before maturity by paying princi- pal with interest accrued to the date of payment, and further provided if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns,the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immediately due and payable; but it is specifically provided-that no assessment shall in any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special benefits to property in the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing provided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case until after notice of hearing as pro- vided by law. Said assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed in the name of the City of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaining the right to authorize payment of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such com- pleted and accepted unit in not more than forty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than$9.00 each, the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than 30 days after the completion and acceptance by the City of the particular unit, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby em- powered to authorize payments of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payment shall he authorized only in instances where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful,valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms there- of of the sums assessed against such property. r s V. The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the City Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon. and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments, or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, and the name of the owners, as far as known,and shall contain such other recitals as may be pertin- ent thereto,and shall further recite substantially that all proceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability of the owners there- of, have been regularly had, done and performed,and such recitals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substan- tially that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together wtili reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which, as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior lien against the property, superior to all other liens and claims except State,County,School District,and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall invalidate any assessment or any certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not invalidate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto. VI. Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and the bid of S.R.O. Construction Company having been found to be the lowest and best bid for the making and construction of said improvements,the contract therefore is hereby awarded to S.R.O. Construction Company , at and for the prices stated in the Proposal of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department, which said report and recom- mendation is on file with the City, the City Manager, and City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the name of the City of Fort Worth,Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things,the prices for the work. Vill. To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by said contract, there is hereby appropriated out of available funds and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pay said indebtedness so incurred. VIII. The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, which law has been adopted as an amend- ment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas,and under which law these proceedings are taken and had. Ix. Each unit above described shall be and constitute a separate and independent unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be made for the improvements in each unit according to the cost of the improvements in that unit and according to the benefits arising from the improvements in that unit. X. In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it shall not be necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall be valid. XL The Director of Public Works of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is hereby, ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of such improvements in each unit, in accordance with the terms of the powers and provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas. XIL The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County Clerk of Tarrant County,Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature of the State of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature,said Act having been passed in the year 1930,and now shown as Article 1220a of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. XIII. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. XIV. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ______ _DAY OF APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY City Attorney ---^_ _-- s CITY OF FORT WORTH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ASSESSMENT PAVING CRAIG AND CANTON STREETS PROJECT NO. 097-24000-130 A Neighborhood Hearing was conducted by the Public Works Department at the West Handley Elementary School on November 10, 1964, for the assessment paving of Craig and Canton Streets, Project 097-24000-130. The procedures concerning property owner 's participation in the cost of the paving, including methods and policies of determining assessments, various methods of payment and City street construction standards were outlined to the 21 persons in attendance. The State Highway Department' has constructed a grade separation for Craig Street at IH 820 in response to a request from the City of Fort Worth to allow development of Craig Street as an east-west collector street for the Meadowbrook area and to assist in the relief of traffic conditions on East Lancaster. Craig Street is designated as an arterial street in the master thoroughfare plan, L%TTP 1 - CRAIG STREET: - Stark Street to Canton Street. Mr. G. 0. Tackett, 2844 Canton Street, the owner of the south one-half of Lot 26, Driscoll Acres, inquired about the amount of the assessment or his property which fronts on Craig Street and abuts both Meaders and Canton Streets. It was explained that although the lot was large enough for two lots, side lot credit was allowed for only one lot because the property is not subdivided. Mrs. Amanda Kliever, 5801 Tackett Court, the owner of the west 50 feet of Lot E, Erie Hill Addition, asked why she was being assessed since her property does not front or back on Craig Street. It was explained that transition paving on Plant Street, on which her property backs, is being paved at its intersection with Graig Street. Under standard policies, Mrs.: Kliever is allowed rear lot credit which is equal to one-half the residential rate. Mr. Herbert L. Teddlie, 6816 Van Natta Place, the owner of the east 46 feet of the west 96 feet of Lot E, Erie Hill Place Addition, stated that he did not think the property owners should have to pay for the paving since the improvements are on public-right-of- way. Standard assessment paving policies of the City were outlined for Mr. Teddlie. UNIT 2 - CRAIG STREET: - Canton Street to Cravens Road. Mr. Floyd Burnett, 5901 Craig Street, the owner of the west 80 feet of Lot 27 and the west 80 feet of the south one-half of Lot 28, Driscoll Acres Addition, asked why Craig Street was to be 36 feet from Stark to Canton and 40 feet from Canton to Cravens and why he should have to pay for the additional widening. It was explained that the widening was needed for traffic circulation and that he would be required to pay no more than the residential rate of $5.40 per front foot, based upon the cost of a standard residential 30 foot street. Mr. C. C. Swett, 5915 Craig Street, the owner of the east 80 feet of Lot 27 and the east 80 feet of the south one-half of Lot 28, Driscoll Acres Addition and Lots 85 and 86, Pollard Estate Addition, expressed concern for his pecan trees which are on the parkway of Craig Street. Mr. Swett was informed that the plan does not call for removal of the trees and that every effort would be made to protect them from damage during construction. -2- Mr. 0. S. Daniel, 5909 Craig Street, the owner of the west 80 feet of the east 160' of Lot 27 and the west 80 feet of the east 160 feet of the south 57 feet of Lot 28, Driscoll Acres Addition, stated that in 1942, Craig Street was paved and at that time he paid the county $33 for the paving. No record of the payment was found in the county records; however, Mr. Daniel has been given a credit of $16 for the existing paving, which represents its depreciated value. UNIT 3 - CANTON STREET: East Lancaster to Craig Street. Mr. Claude Wilson, 5901 Tackett Court, the owner of the west 50 feet of Lot 1, Erie Hill Place Addition, expressed dissatisfaction with his assessment since it originally was $5.40 per frontfoot and now is $6.62 per front foot for an owner-occupied residence on commercially zoned property (E-Commercial). It was explained that Canton Street originally was planned for a 30 foot roadway with residential type pavement. Upon further consider- ation, however, it was determined that a 36 foot roadway with an intermediate grade pavement would be required to accommodate the anticipated traffic loads. There were no other objections to the Canton Street paving. i s ATTACHMENT "B" ' 1':GE 1 OF 1 CRAIG AND CANTON STREETS PROJECT NO. 097-24000-130 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE................................................................................:....:......................=57,828.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 59782.80 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST,........................................... ...............................................................$632610080 10060 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 2984.3.2 66.6 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE,............................. 1,426v3 33.4 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 4926905 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................IF 239427.06 36.8 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT................................................... 119498040 18.1 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.........................................................................................6 34,925.48 54.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED.......................................................:........................................ 160759.62 26.3 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................................................. 18,165.86 28.6 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......................................................................................................$459444.94 71.4 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 4,269.5 PER CENT 10010 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 35 THE CUMULATIVE RESULTS PER CENT 100.0 H OF THE POST CARD SURVEY i ARE AVAILABLE UPON NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 30 }, REQUEST. PER CENT 100.0 A A OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 14 Q PER CENT 100.0 H OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 16 ~ PER CENT 100.0 i ATTACHMENT "B" PAGE 2 OF 4 CRAIG STREET STARK STREET TO CANTON STREET UNIT 1 PER CENT CONTRACT PRICE............................................. ...........................................................= 21t337.00 ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 2,133.70 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................= 23,470.70 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE 19109.0 65.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 597.0 35.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE......................................... 19 706.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 8p694.56 37.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 4,680.48 20.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................= 181,375.04 57.0 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 69088.91 26.0 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................................................. 7,286.13 31.0 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................sl6vl84.57 69.0 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19706.0 618.5 189.6 897.9 PER CENT 100.0 36.3 11.1 52.6 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 13 3 2 8 PER CENT 100.0 >4 23.1 15.4 61.5 F NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 12 C) 3 2 7 PER CENT 100.0 f� 25.0 16.7 58.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 w 1 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 H 25.0 25.0 50.0 Fy OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 8 z 2 1 5 PER CENT 100.0 H 25.0 12*5 62.5 ATTACHMENT "S" PAGE 3 of 4 CRAIG STREET CANTON STREET TO CRAVENS ROAD UNIT 2 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 279723.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 22 772.30 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................. .s 30t495.30 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1 9 515.2 78.2 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 421.6 21.8 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1 9 936.8 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 139015.56 42.7 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 39621.55 11.9 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$169637011 54.6 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 9,676.70 31.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 6,960.41 22.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i 239534.89 77.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19936.8 183.0 712.0 19041.8 PER CENT 100.0 9.4 36.8 53.8 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 15 y, 1 5 9 PER CENT 10060 H 6.7 33.3 60.0 U NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 1 5 7 PER CENT 10010 7.7 38.5 53.8 Fy OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 9 -a 4 5 PER CENT 100.0 H -0- 44.4 55.6 z r-a OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 1 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 ATTACHMENT "B" iPAGE 4 OF 4 CANTON STREET E. LANCASTER TO CRAIG STREET PER Unit 3 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 8,768.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 876.80 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 99644.80 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 219.0 35.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 407.7 65.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 6.26.7 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 19,716.96 17.8 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 3,196.37 33.1 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................= 43,913.33 50.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 994.01 10.3 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 3019632 40.6 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i 5p725.48 59.4 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 626.7 -0- 252.5 374.2 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 40.3 59.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 7 -0- 3 4 PER CENT 10010 H -0- 42.9 57.1 r-I U NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 7 3 4 PER CENT 100.0 p� -0- 42.9 57.1 W OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 d d0- 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 F. -0- 33.3 66.7 H z OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 -O- 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 -0- 50.0 50.0 } > W D 0\ O (� Z3 10 00 N (1) cn --1 -4 Z w a N w F_ O NLL 2 O O F a LL a Q Ian z O J O O N a a O v w IL N OD a N011113d a3NJIS ~w Vl O O .--I IA N O Z N a f- N M of O 0 co O N -4 O N w r N 04 cM 00 (N .M-1 Or N w N Z � -�4 ` dr N o m ro OolN O w O N N In V N Cl) N O � N .1 -00 0 10 A N 004 o as z w F- v It v IT It It 'ITIt } W O co co m of OD co co m m z a �c O Z } O D In \O O a, O O It O w ol 0o -M4 N co In N 0 >. a ur > a v z in o r 0 n (o a x n~ o - m +J Ir H m u cn w 6 } m 10 %O .p --1 F- ir m to a. M H N W W w 41 H O O O C.-i M 4+ w o a)W Q. O i N M U U) oa in M U J a rt r a.0 N a IOA N . N o cn tH °a 4. ";4. w W .D O Z O cd --i co .-4 2 H aav' w 3NOZ m w w w w w w m m a o c~n o > M N a w z CL w o 0 41 o cr� w ca a F aa) m ti m w m H 10 n a = of O Z N a .o ti -o 'i ti m � 4J a acne 2Q �' e°i � � mi c c c+� x Cl) Q c m a z m c w .c m .-1 to o o � z w n m rn v � -4 00 -4 ol i H.� .°+-4 + w pxp w la o w > c �tl{U{�,,�� a Q U N W C] � m �' aa)) H _ a t¢ W "1 Z IL 43 aawna. aoq U') mm1 Um C)m ca. .'� �� ale lLO .4N w k oW o S o zK \ $ z co w04 � z m \ k \ § L } \ § 2 0 U. \ a \0 Ne1113d O]NO G 0 Z§0 § B p q q :)(nw 3 j k\k k \ / @ z � 2 \ co $ \ X § § / E§ § q Cl) a. 0 co co co co co 0 0 0 0 Ew o o g LL u- 2 k m \ g , # © ® ) gB z § ^ m 0 10 § Q w c � � � m � 0 « ® (L o j % w m r # , w q ) ° / G ]\ \\ 3No Z m m « ca )§ 9 § > m ■ 00 § z P4 2 A _ J a) S§ r j z k 3cA k f� )zto g ; J4 ; � 0� \§ 2g� \ i 41 jj k\ Gj A2 § ] R J) �� # ` «k k\ 30 \R j/ \\ §$ 2< II 2R � R H§ H$ > OC st 0 0 0 e U �� 00 0 z a � a U �W LL z O o O O o aH z0 00 00 m tL c a 0 ZLLI J ¢ W 0 P � lL NOIlil3d 03NOIS 0 Ziinn� h ap \0 10 N 0 ID 0 ID �LL IJJ .N-I N V N I' N aQa U � o W O 10 O N N 0 m 10 O fn Z to N 01 N N N CV Goo N NO=Q W w 00 co to 0 00 00 Ol d O 0: j. U cn 110 if \0 co m 110 M z as f- 01 rn rn rn rn to rn rn i+ w O La �n Ln Ln �n LO LO �n a Ow a; co co 07 co 0; en 00 f- 0 It o 0 0 0 0 0 Z W C r o Co o N et O co 10 co L co 1100 � � LL k A k > N Z 0 0 •�� as -i s .�i s o F- 0U c0i x N d 0 0 +1 10 c0 w U10 ++ a A A Wy A W W to LO a Y H o. N 4. .of •ad ) O H 0 ON ON4. 0 0C 3 0Ch ON ONN 0 k 0: F a 0 O 4. N L. 4. pp N - N 4- 4. Ot to W J O OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 iC5 .s i LO 00 4- O 0 -0 0 w 0 N N rr4 E a 00 ♦rdcv 00- CO - 'I n c> 00 - 0o- 41 !d O O N N O O C {j 1O 1D k k 10 10 h a +n Ln C7 a. H 0 3NOZ a w a ¢ ¢ a m w w a O cn z yam to a: ¢ UF to W ao W z O tom,) 4) cc N . HC 4m� NC TO4d1 aaxa.0 Z a 10 N• a • to 0 W >. a U w k w k s a Q 0W w co N (A ¢to V 4) 0 • Q .-+ as c .0 c -o a y cn 4 CA U a .r b N2 to r cri i k B-4Q (0 k k N €� a U U a U En z lL ) ) W 0 C H Ul O .,-i 01 U O 0 Ln (-+ �n00 k0 N O CO It ,q �t too CO CO a U0 O NW NW 70 � 10 mto 4 L @ D 10 10 Y W > .�Dp O LO C7 Oir LD OOg, W e e U) zN N 00 .O -4 Ol d Q o LLJ Q h U Chi w Z O O h o a ZO N r- IL a d O tL z J O O a � 00 DO N011113d 03NJIS LLJ (A zinc r- OD O 10 O N O O W w O CV LO O -1 ccO�� t� O Q N QLLJ iC 00 N to 1 a, Q U 10 co O .1 O fn z U) m in a, N -4 m O- o In 0 En N O rn Ol O 8 in \0 M co r Z d Q •--1 N .-t .--� ID i H w a h 0 LO In Ln LO In LO LO LOZ i W e e e e e e 5 a 0 m Oo co 00 00 m W ro h LL O p p O U M O co Cl) C7 O (71 2 e s e a W N N W OD U) .H-1 O, � W a 41 z O M 0 ~ C S O V N a 1 4 N A a ti a w h c N a. N 4. 0 O a 4+ h o- c*� W a O .4 N m in 000 00 N W J O 4A a OD .4. t� W o t� H 0 3NOZ w w w a ¢ ¢ Q a pp z G ?rot a m w m a �, W z OF0 O 0 F o It w N Q h m .yr (a +- 4+ }+ in z OO X h C W A N H 41 k O e a z O d � ��IF t�'-N H � +-U N k 0 0 d > -H m w LO 4+ rn +s rn +1 m o U U Q Q CL A � ''O .-4-4 N O Bt H fn k co u H N >. UU to z IL y w a N C> Cl tf/U E3 C3 d w 0 ++ -H c� rn +� U U� U 0 ra O co O w O .-4 w O � O �-+ I-4 .-i .71 C (1) a W. Or O H O\O O O O OT k c0 c W. a. .a\o¢ u� a t)Ln ci LO e i LO i-x N LLI fD O r O 7 0 o e N Z� Cl) L 0 Cl) F a " W WLL Cl) H �y N Z 0 0 LO ,n 0 0 1ol 0 0 LO .� a LL tr a - N 0 0 tL z w ~ J 4 W O W NOW13d 03NDIS co ~W to co � 0 0 rco Z!n i F- D N w z to C+ if3 c ol O aaa U s� H W 10 � O O O 0 10tMrj fn Z O0CA m It M D (n > o O O N �F 6l O V co if)) H it N �A c> co 10 LU !a LU 0 00 00 co OD co co co co crao e tL f• r r r r r r r ~ z H LO O o r o o fn r o 0 0 0 0 W co Crn O O O O cl .o LL LA- co 10 LO 1-9 -4 (a com m IDD z a v a n t` z 0 m 10 0 � r m N N � O N cc to C4 W H CD W Sh H a 0 v N w (D y a H w a 0 a o —f 0 o-e x a a J L)o M U 0 4n a w w4r NW ow z o o-4z a 3NOZ ua 4n ca w w w w O41 ¢ a C7 U z H O 0 <U.�Li Iq Enir p In w 0 ¢ 0 a a 0 41 F. r a i- 44 Ufa h C O ' 'o a vo ¢ 0 z w (0cn iz�4i ev �v : x Z a Q C 04 C Z C �H a i4-� 4 H C 0 4 oa 0) V 0 114 cu 44) a m w W d -H41 > ax Ux F 2 Q W A O�p v I-fu b ? W txU.1 a —4-4W ...7 AU m pF tcW :4 ) Z LL xcri .x � aof Uol .10 H n00 0 m0 00 m0 00 TN —e0 cN Gnaw I rn 014 v rn � 10 m00 ,1rn mob h City of Dort Worth, Eexas Mayor and Council Communication DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: paving Improvements on Craig and PAGE 12/7/64 NUMBER C-418 Canton Streets 1 of 2_ Council action on the project described below is requested. Project Description Nature of work: Assessment paving of Craig Street from Stark Street to Interstate 820 (Cravens Read), and Canton Street from East Lancaster to :Craig Street. The paving is proposed for intermediate type standard at the following roadway widths: Craig Street Stark to Canton - 36 feet Canton to Cravens - 40 feet Canton Street - 36 feet 3 Craig Street - on December 2, 1963, authority was granted to negotiate for necessary right-of-way and prepare plans and specifications for the project (M&C G-582). Canton Street - The improvement of Canton for a dis- tance of approximately 300 feet will provide an ade- quate connection between East Lancaster and the pro- posed paving on Craig Street. This portion of Canton was included in an earlier assessment paving project but was deleted because of owner objections. A report provided Council Members on September 4, 1964, indi- cated that this segment of Canton would be included with the Craig Street improvements, based upon traffic circulation needs and the results of .a post card survey, which showed that a majority of the property owners do not object to the paving. Submission of Bids Date bids received: September 8, 1964 Bidder Amount Bid Working Days S.R.O. Construction Company, Arlington $57,828.00 50 R. W. Gibbins, Inc. 59,070.50 50 Glade, Inc. 59,191.97 50 Texas Bitulithic Company 59864.00 50 General Construction Company 61:879.75 50 W. E. Brittain, Inc. 63,306.50 50 Project Cost and Financing Based on the low bid, approximately $18,165.86 will be assessed against abutting property owners . The city-at-large will pay approximately $45,444.94 for its share of the cost of the paving, including engineering and miscellanea<<s expenses. An additional $18,400 will also be required for the purchase of necessary right-of-way on Craig Street. DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Paving Improvements on Craig and PAGE 12/7/64 NUMBERC-418 Canton Streets of _2— Recommendations It is recommended: 1) That the following bond fund transfers be approved: Amount From TO Purpose $63,844.94 097-24000-901 097-24000-130 To provide for the City's Unspecified Craig and portion of construction, Canton Streets engineering and miscel- laneous expenses, and to provide funds for purchase of right-of-way. $18,165.86 Revolving Fund 042-09724-130 To provide for the property Craig and owners' portion of the con- Canton Streets struction cost. 2) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Declaring the necessity for and ordering the improvements on streets as specified above; b) Making provisions for the levying of assessments; c) Directing the Public Works Department to prepare estimates of cost and the amount proposed to be assessed; d) Awarding the contract to S.R.O. Construction Company on its low bid of $57,828. 3) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Approving the estimates of cost and amount to be assessed; b) Setting December 28, 1964, as the date of the Benefit Hearing. JLB:GA The following summaries are attached: Attachment "A" - Resume of the paving project Attachment "B" - Distribution of cost and assessments, and results of post card survey Attachment "C" - Assessment rolls in alphabetical order SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSITION 01 COUNCIL: PROC94ED BY PPROVED M,16THER (DESCRIBE) 9O /• � 0� ♦ V� Jro` b / '�f FC/,-- CITY SECRETARY /ITY P 4'1 n �t I�+ 9 "�c /� oft�Y �✓- DATE 4r ANAGER _ f 1 h ,fir /1 7- 4,J �w 1 7 W