Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinance 5297
ORDINANCE NO.---sr-'7 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVID- ING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF PISMM STET AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CONTRACT TO Texas Bitulithic Company FOR THE MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBT- EDNESS THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESS- MENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CER- TIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE ESTIMATES; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSE- QUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE FORTIETH LEG- ISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106, COMMONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDI- NANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth,Texas,has prepared Plans and Speci- fications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been examined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all matters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and adopted. II: There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter described portions of streets, av- enues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, to-wit: ' 1. FISTR STREET: Yrom the 71est end of Fisher Street to the West line of Sylvania Avenue, known and designated as Unit No. 1. 2. GREER STREET: From the West line of Samuels Avenue to the West end of Greer Street, known and designated as Unit No. 2. 3. CARVER STREET: From the East line of Maple Street to the West line of Leota Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3. 4. ALLEY: From the 2400 Block of Dell Street to the South line of Lillian Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4. 5. GILCRBST MM; From the North line of Yucca Street to the South line of Primrose Street, known and designated as Unit No. 5. 6. WAma AVnTJE: From the East line of Grover Street to the West line of Deen Road, known and designated as Unit No. 6. 7. MINOR STREET: From the North line of 29th Street to the East line of Beach Street, known and designated as Unit No. 7. III Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas,shall be improved by raising,grading,and filling same and by constructing thereon the following,to-wit: 1. FISffit STREET: From the West and of Fisher Street to the West line of Sylvania Avenue, known and designated as Unit No. 1, a 6 inch hot mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 26 foot roadway. 2. , GREER STREET: From the ?west line. of Samuels Avenue to the West end of Greer Street, known and designated as Unit No. 2, a 6 inch hot mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 26 foot roadway. 3. CARVER STREET: From the East line of Maple Street to the West line of Keota Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3, a 6 inch hot mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 4. 4LLEY: From the 2400 block of Dell Street to the South line of Killian Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4, a 6,inch hot mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 10 foot roadway. 5. GILCREST DRM: From the North line of Yucca Street to the South line of Primrose Street, known and designated as Unit No. 5, a 6 inch hot mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 6. WARacK AVEhm: From the East line of Grover Street to the West line of Dean Road, known and designated as Unit No. 6, a 6 inch hot mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. 7. ELINOR STREET: From the North line of 29th Street to the East line of Beach Street, known and designated as Unit No. 7, a.6 inch hot mix asphaltic concrete surface on a 30 foot roadway. The above,together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurten- ances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor. IV. The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as follows, to-wit: A. The property abutting on that portion of the street, avenue or public place and the real and true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine- tenths (9/10ths) of the estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements. B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said improvements after deduct- ing the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting'properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A. The amounts payable by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners thereof and shall constitute a first and prior lien upon such properties and a personal liability of the real and true owners thereof, and shall be payable, to-wit: When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular unit,the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become payable in five (5) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of such completion and acceptance, and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such installments after the date of completion and acceptance of such respective unit.The entire amount assessed against the particular parcels of property shall bear interest from the date of such completion and acceptance of the improvements on the unit upon which the particular property abuts at the rate of six (6clo) per cent per annum,payable annually except as to interest on the first installment,which shall be due and payable on the date said installment matures, provided that any owner shall have the right to pay any and all of such installment at any time before maturity by paying princi- pal with interest accrued to the date of payment,and further provided if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns,the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immediately due and payable; but it is specifically provided-that no assessment shall in any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special benefits to property in the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing provided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case until after notice of hearing as pro- vided by law. Said assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed,in the name of the City of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaining the right to authorize payment of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such com- pleted and accepted unit in not more'than_forty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than$9.00 each, the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than 30 days after the completion and acceptance by the City of the particular unit, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby em- powered to authorize payments of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a Ionger period of time in cases in which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payment shall be authorized only in instances where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful,valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms there- of of the sums assessed against such property. The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the City Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon. and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments, or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, and the name of the owners, as far as known,and shall contain such other recitals as may be pertin- ent thereto, and shall further recite substantially that all proceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability of the owners there- of, have been regularly had, done and performed, and such recitals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substan- tially that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together wtili reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which, as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior lien against the property, superior to all other liens and claims except State,County,School District,and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall invalidate any assessment or any certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not invalidate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto. V1. Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and the bid of Texas Bitulithie Company , having been found to be the lowest and best bid for the making and construction of said improvements, the contract therefore is hereby awarded to Texas Bitulithic Company , at and for the prices stated in the Proposal of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department, which said report and recom- mendation is on file with the City, the City Manager, and City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the name of the City of Fort Worth,Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things,the prices for the work. VII. To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by said contract, there is hereby appropriated out of available funds and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pay said indebtedness so incurred. VIII. The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statute., which law has been adopted as an amend- ment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas,and under which law these proceedings are taken and had. Ix. Each unit above described shall be and constitute a separate and independent unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be made for the improvements in each unit according to the cost of the improvements in that unit and according to the benefits arising from the improvements in that unit. X. In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it shall not be necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall be valid. XI. The Director of Public Works of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is hereby, ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of such improvements in each unit,in accordance with the terms of the powers and provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas. XIL The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County Clerk of Tarrant County,Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature of the State of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature,said Act having been passed in the year 1930, and now shown as Article 1220a of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. XIII. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. XIV. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS- ..-------- _DAY OF , 19 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney_--- _-- ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF FORT WORTH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ASSESSMENT PAVING SEVEN LOCATIONS ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE PROJECT 097-24000-128 RESUME OF THE PROJECT The Public Works Department conducted a Neighborhood Hearing at the Oakhurst Elementary School on November 9, 1964, for Assessment Paving at Seven Locations Northeast Side, 097-24000-128. Street construction 'standards, methods of payment and the policies used in determining- assessments were explained to the 29 persons '-in attendance. UNIT 1 FISHER STREET - West end of ,Fisher Street to Sylvania Avenue. Mrs. Arstella Craver,, 2509 Fisher, owner of Lots 23 and 24, Block '2, J. W. Burton Addi- tion, objed'ted.•to• the amount of., the assessment. Mr. L. L. Burton, ,234 N. Sylvania,, owner of Lots 29, 30 and W. 19' of 31, Block 2, Lots 7, 8, 91 10, Block 3, all -in'-J., W.:, Burton,Addition,; stated he is selling the properties on sales contract and proposes 'tp pass the paving assessments on to the buyers. He also stated that he considered',the monthly payments excessive and inquired if the pay- ments could be extended over-a period of 60 months. ' It was explained that unless a hardship case was indicated, the' time limit for payment was 49 months. Mr. Will Allen, owner of Lots 13, 14 and part of 15, Block 3, J. W. Burton Addition, spoke in favor of the paving, UNIT 2 - GREER STREET - West end�of Greer to Samuels Avenue. No objections to the paving were..made 'at the Neighborhood Hearing. Greer Street was placed in an assessment paving project because property owners representing 68.2 per cent of the front footage petitioned the City to pave the street. However, the poll card survey indicates owners representing 59 per cent of the footage are now opposed to the paving. UNIT 3 - CARVER STREET - Maple Street to Leota Street. No objections to the assessment paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 4 - ALLEY - 2400 Block Dell Street to Lillian Street. No objections to the assessment paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. UNIT 5 - GILCREST DRIVE - Yucca Street to Primrose Street. No objections to the assessment paving were made at the Neighborhood Hearing. Although additional right-of-way is needed for the improvement of Gilcrest, property owners have verbally agreed to dedicate to the City the required right-of-way. It is anticipated that deeds for acquisition of the Needed right-of-way will be executed prior to the Benefit Hearing. UNIT 6 - WARWICK AVENUE - Grover Street to Deen Road. Mr. H. M. Stogner, owner of Lot 13, Block 36, Diamond Hills Addition, spoke in favor of the paving. ATTACHMENT "A" Page 2 UNIT 7 - ELINOR STREET - 28th Street to Beach Street. Jack Estes, Jr. , owner of Lots 18A, 19B, 19C, 19D, 20B, 20C, Harlem Gardens Addi- tion, stated he has contracted to sell several pieces of his property and asked who would have to pay the assessment. It was explained that the assessment would be levied against the fee title owner of the property. Mr, Grant Ellison, owner of Lots 10A, 10B, and IOC of Harlem Gardens and Mr. Sylvester Hyman, owner of Lot 18A, Harlem Gardens spoke in favor of the paving. sum : VTMMVMM Elms r`' 1FAROMMERM11 ,tONE MINUIP ^ r � _ s • .:I t, ' i d11' )flail:•t.! �, � ffff� .f = '' OEM �- "" �► spar., gig PJAN i I /rlE,`lifl ., if' 1 '►'y' r �ir. � i film =WNW lip MM * A • 1 ' ' III : - ATTACHMENT "B" Page 1 of 8 SEVEN LOCATIONS N.E. SIDE Project No. 097-24000-128 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICL.......................................................................... v ....... ...............$769627.50 ENGINEERING ..........................................................................................I................... 7,662,75 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST............................................................................«...-.............................1 84.290.25 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.......... 69200.35 71.1 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 2,523.60 28.9 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 89723095 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.....................................:................$379618.57 44.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 149930.07 17.7 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................*529548.64 62.3 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 109843.27 12.8 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 419705037 49.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LAME.--................................................................................................*429584.88 50.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 89723.95 4,591.33 PER CENT 100.0 52.6 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 123 6$ PER CENT 100.0 55.2 The cumulative results of the post card survey NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 100 63 are available upon PER CENT 100.0 63.0 request. OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 72 51 PER CENT 10010 70.8 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 28 12 PER CENT 100.0 42.8 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 2 of 8 UNIT 1 - FISHER ST. WEST END OF FISHER TO SYLVANIA AVE. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE........................................................................................................ .S 59765.50 ENGINEERING ............................................................. .............................................. 576.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 69 342.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 0.0 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. ..... ..............__... 7500 0 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE....... ..._....._............. ....• 750,0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT...................... ..............................$ 0.00 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT........................................... ...... 4 312.50 68.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED......................................................................................i 49312.50 68.0 LESS CREDITS GRANTED....................................... ...................................... ..... ..... . 917.52 14.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT...................... ................................................................................... .................... 31394098 53.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE................................ ................. ... ..................... ......................s2,947.07 46.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 750.0 426.08 161.0 0.0 589.0 PER CENT 100.0 56.8 21.5 0.0 78.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 18 9 4 0 14 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 22.2 0.0 7708 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 12 9 4 0 8 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 10 9 4 0 6 PER CENT 100.0 90.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 3 of 8 UNIT 2 - GREER ST. SAMUEIS AVE. TO WEST END OF GREER PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE................................................................................................. ........$109965.50 ENGINEERING ................................................ .......................................... ................. 1 f 096.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................4129062.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... 0.0 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE..............................1 9 174.5 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ....................... ... .....1917495 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 0.00 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT... . - .. . ..... ...... - ... 61753.38 55.9 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.... .... ............. .................................................................E 69753.38 55.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED.............................................................................................. 797.00 6.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT..................................................................................... ........................................ 59956.38 49.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE............................................................................. ....................... S 69105.67 50.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 13,174.5 800.5 195.0 693.5 286.0 PER CENT 100.0 68.2 16.6 59.0 24.4 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 19 14 4 10 5 PER CENT 100.0 73.7 21.0 52.7 26.3 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 18 13 3 10 5 PER CENT 100.0 72.2 16.6 55.6 27.8 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 13 11 3 8 2 PER CENT 100.0 84.6 23.1 61.6 15.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 5 2 0 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 4 of 8 UNIT 3 - CARVER AVE. Maple St. to Leota St. i• PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 139870.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 19387.05 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s 159257.55 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1 9 120.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1 9 120.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 79224.00 47.3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 79224.00 47.3 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1.187016 7.8 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 69036.84 39.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 99220.71 60.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAYING PAYING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 19120.0 650.0 100.0 100.0 920.0 PER CENT 100.0 58.0 8.9 8.9 82.2 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 22 13, 2, 2^ 18- PER CENT 100.0 59.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 19 11 2 2 15 PER CENT 100.0 57.8 10.5 10.5 79.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 15 8 2 2 11 PER CENT 100.0 53.3 13.3 13.3 73.4 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 3 0 0 4 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 5 of 8 UNIT 4 ALLEY 2400 Blk. Dell St. to Lillian St. PER CENT CONTRACT PRICE....................................... ... $ 1�468.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 146.85 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 19 615.35 10010 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.. 507.2 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 000 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 507.2 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 897074 55.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT .................................................. 0.00 010 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 897.74 55.6 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 189.74 11.8 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 708.00 43.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................$ 907.35 56.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAYING PAYING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 507.2 507.2 507.2 010 000 PER CENT 10010 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 4 4 0 0 PER CENT 10010 100.0 10010 0.0 0.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 4 4 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 10000 0.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 4 4 0 0 PER CENT 10010 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 6 of 8 UNIT 5 - GILCREST DRIVE YUCCA ST. TO PRIMROSE ST. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................; 7.j252.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 725.25 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s 79977.75 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 650015 74,7 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. . 220.0 25.3 TOTAL FOOTAGE 870.15 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 49193047 52.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 19419.00 17.8 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................= 59612.47 70.4 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 28347.45 29.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 38265.02 41.0 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......:.................................................................................................4 49712.73 59.0 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 870,15 457.95 314.2 134.0 421.95 PER CENT 100.0 52.6 36.1 15.4 48.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 8 5 2 1 5 PER CENT 100.0 62.5 25.0 12.5 62.5 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 7 5 2 1 4 PER CENT 10060 71.4 28.5 14.3 51.2 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 3 1 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 2 1 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 66.7 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 7 of 8 UNIT 6 - WARWICK AVE. GROVER ST. TO DEEN RD. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 8�211.50 ENGINEERING ................................................................................................I............. 821.15 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 9,,032.65 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... 741.5 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 74105 '[co 0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 49782.67 52.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 "-)1 0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................5 49782067 52.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED.................................................................................I.............. 778.58 8.6 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 4'004.09 44.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. .....................................................$ 59028.56 55.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 741.5 291.5 169.5 172.0 40Oa 0 PER CENT 100.0 39.3 22.9 23.2 53.9 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 12 5 3 2 7 PER CENT 100.0 41.7 25.0 16.7 58.3 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 12 5 3 2 7 PER CENT 100.0 41.7 25.0 16.7 58.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 8 5 2 2 4 PER CENT 100.0 62.5 25.0 25.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 0 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 8 of 8 UNIT 7 - ELINOR ST. 28th ST. TO BEACH ST. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 29,093.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 20909.35 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 329,002.85 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 39181.5 8904 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 379.1 10.6 TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ................................... 39560.6 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................; 20,5200 69 64.1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 29445.19 7.6 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................5 22,965.88 71.7 LESS CREDITS GRANTED............................................................................................... 4,625.82 14.4 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 18934OoO6 57.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. .....................................................$ 13,662.79 42.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 3,560.6 10458.10 679.9 379.0 21501.7 PER CENT 100.0 41.0 19.1 10.6 70.3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 40 18 9 2 29 PER CENT 100.0 45.0 22.5 5.0 72.5 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 28 16 7 2 19 PER CENT 100.0 57.1 25.0 7.1 67.9 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 18 11 5 2 11 PER CENT 100.0 61.1 27.8 11.1 61.1 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 5 2 0 8 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 20o O 0.0 80.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 1 of 8 SEVEN LOCATIONS N.E. SIDE Project No. 097-24000-128 PER CENT CONTRACT PRIG.„..............., $76.627.50 ENGINEERING ............. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST,................... RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE ............................. 69200.35 71.1 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 2.5� 23 60 28.9 TOTAL FOOTAGE 8 f 723.95 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT„„,...„.....-.......„.............. ........ t 37f618.57 44.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 149930.07 17.7 GROSSAMOUNT Aftt ..........................................................................................$529548.64 62.3 . LESSCREDITS OPAWMW............................................................................................... 10f843.27 12.8 i TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................... ..... .. . ..... . .. ........................................,,..,..,....,.. „.....„......... 41f 705.37 49.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT t ........................ ....................... ..... ,s 42f584.88 50.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 80723.95 4f591.33 PER CENT 100.0 52.6 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 123 6$ PER CENT 100.0 55.2 The cumulative results of the post card survey NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 100 63 are available upon PER CENT 100.0 63.0 request. OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 72 51 PER CENT 100.0 70.8 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 28 12 PER CENT 100.0 42.8 ATTACHIv9ENT "B" ` Page 2 of 8 UNIT 1 - FISHER ST. WEST END OF FISHER TO SYLVANIA AVE. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE...........................................................................................................$ 5'765.50 ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 576.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 6,342.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 0.0 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 75Oo 0 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE...................................... ..... 75090 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.,... ................................ $ 0.00 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT................................................... 4,312.50 68.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 4V312.50 68.0 LESSCREDITS GRANTED.............................................................................................. 917.52 14.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 3,394098 53.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.............................................................................. .........................$2,947.07 46.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 750.0 426.08 161.0 0.0 589.0 PER CENT 100.0 56.8 21.5 0.0 78.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 18 9 4 0 14 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 22.2 0.0 77.8 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 12 9 4 0 8 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 10 9 4 0 6 PER CENT 100.0 90.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 3 of 8 UNIT 2 - GREER ST. SAMUELS AVE. TO WEST END OF GREER PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$109965.50 ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................ 4 096.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................i 12,062.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE..,............................ 0.0 0.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE..............................1 9 174.5 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE...........................................1 v 174.5 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 0.00 0.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 69 753.38 55.9 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................5 6,753.38 55.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED............................................................................................... 797.00 6.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 59956.38 49.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................3 6,105.67 50.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1 t 174.5 800.5 195.0 693.5 286.0 PER CENT 100.0 68.2 16.6 59.0 24.4 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 19 14 4 10 5 PER CENT 100.0 73.7 21.0 52.7 26.3 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 18 13 3 10 5 PER CENT 100.0 72.2 16.6 55.6 27.8 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 13 11 3 8 2 PER CENT 100.0 84.6 23.1 61.6 15.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 5 2 0 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 4 of 8 UNIT 3 - CARVER AVE. Maple St. to Leota St. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 13 1,870,50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 11,387.05 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 151,257.55 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1 9 120.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 1 9 120.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 79224.00 47.3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 71,224.00 47.3 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1.187.16 7.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 6.036084 39.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 91220.71 60.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1 t 120.0 650.0 100.0 100.0 920.0 PER CENT 100.0 58.0 8.9 8.9 8 2.2 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 22 13" 2, 2, 18-, PER CENT 100.0 59.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 19 11 2 2 15 PER CENT 100.0 57.8 10.5 10.5 79.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 15 8 2 2 11 PER CENT 100.0 53.3 13.3 13.3 73.4 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 3 0 0 4 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 ATTAGBMEAT "B" Page 5 of 8 UNIT 4 .. ALLEY 2400 Blk. Dell St. to Lillian St. PER CENT CONTRACT PRICE................................................. .........$ 19468.50 ENGINEERING ......................................................................................I....................... 146.85 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST..................... ..................................... 19615.35 100,0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 507.2 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 010 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 507.2 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................: 897074 55.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.............................................:...... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.........................................................................................•i 897.74 55.6 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 189.74 11.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................... 708.00 43.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................S 907.35 56.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 507.2 507.2 507.2 0.0 0.0 PER CENT 100.0 10000 100.0 0.0 0.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 4 4 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 10000 100.0 0.0 000 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 4 4 0 0 PER CENT 10000 10000 100.0 0.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 4 4 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 10000 000 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 000 0.0 000 0.0 ATTAC,11MENT "BO'' Page 6 of 8 UNIT 5 - GILCREST DRIVE YUCCA ST. TO PRIMROSE ST. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 71,252.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 725.25 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCnOW C4$T................................................................................................................i 79977.75 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 650015 74.7 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 220.0 25.3 TOTAL FOOTAGE 870.15 10000 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 4'193.47 52.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT............................................... .. 19419.00 17.8 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 59612.47 70.4 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 211347.45 29.4 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................... 30265.02 41.0 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$ 49712.73 59.0 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 870.15 457.95 314.2 134.0 421.95 PER CENT 100.0 52.6 36.1 15.4 48.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 8 5 2 1 5 PER CENT 100.0 62.5 25.0 12.5 62.5 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 7 5 2 1 4 PER CENT 10010 71.4 28.5 14.3 51.2 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 3 1 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 2 1 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 66.7 ATTACHMENT OR" Page 7 of S UNIT 6 - WARWICK AVE. GROVER ST. TO DEEN RD. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 8 p 211.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 821.15 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................ x 99032.65 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 741.5 10010 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 000 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 741.5 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................111 49,782,67 52.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0." 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 41.M2067 52.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED...................................:............................................................ 778.58 8.6 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 41 004.09 44.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE....-................................................................................................$ 51 028.56 55,o7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 741.5 291.5 169.5 172.0 400,0 PER CENT 100.0 39.3 22.9 23.2 53.9 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 12 5 3 2 7 PER CENT 100.0 41.7 25.0 16.7 5803 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 12 5 3 2 7 PER CENT 100.0 41.7 25.0 16.7 58.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 8 5 2 2 4 PER CENT 100.0 62.5 25.0 25.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 0 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 ATTACHMENT "B" Page 8 of 8 UNIT 7 - ELINOR ST. 28th ST. TO BEACH ST. PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE.....................................................................................................,......i 29,093.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 21,909.35 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 32,002.85 10000 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 39181e 5 89.4 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 379.1 10.6 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 39560.6 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 20,520.69 64.1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 2,445.19 7.6 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 229965.88 7107 LESS CREDITS GRANTED.,...................................I.......................................I..... I....- 4,625.82 14.4 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................... 18 93400 06 57.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.............................................................................. .........................$ 13,662.79 42.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 3,560.6 11458.10 679.9 379.0 22,501.7 PER CENT 100.0 41.0 19.1 10.6 70.3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 40 18 9 2 29 PER CENT 100.0 45.0 22.5 5.0 72.5 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 28 16 7 2 19 PER CENT 100.0 57.1 25.0 7.1 670 9 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 18 11 5 2 11 PER CENT 100.0 61.1 27.8 11.1 61.1 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 10 5 2 0 8 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 } U) Z? (71 to LO tr) LO l� 10 N N N N Q � Q � Q O") U W z O a w cr a O LL. w -J c� w 0 M N011113d 1p m N C13NDIS 0 z a: H o 10 � LO OwU. w g U. N rn `� ` v ago � Q U ps O O Z � ti N N N h ti LO 0 LO (n=) (n o e 0 0 W w rn v It0r0QQ O jr N 4 M 1 r-4 .--4 z 1-4 z H O LO LO LO Ln LO ti r Ln w a 00 Lr; Ln v; d; If; d; c; u-; jr w O w r M N N N N W W 4 O LO 2 O O F. a7 c s a a a a c F- a o � 0 a U �f N LO W O }, J Cl) N N Cl) CY) M M N 1 m d' 4W a Ld o IL LWt.� a O W O 4+ {_ OD O'1 N.-I U9 Fi C N M (0 N r1 C`O� C �4 a M m N—4 3 NO Z FG H z a > o g3 (n a: 9 F- w z a (� w uxiv 0 > > > m H N Q Q Q Q > w ti Z go .a 3 is000 2 w . .c c c -4 CD a am .a �tf ab .4c +� H > > > ro W H . N rl ti -4 7 H t11 .-1 4 .7 >� .a >r -1 T r7 (ff N to to N W Z W a W q W C W G C C C N W �p...�u g 0 so LOC OOP tHO+ Z LO A ��Oys z O z .iVO z Gr Q ¢ wa QN PQN FAN 03N mN MN AN UN } ir W N O Ocn � a ZQ LO LON N U W M 1- W N O NO F- Z N a p 0 o � a P.a W O ,On M LO 03NJIS r zNa H LO T) U) o LO U) nNw p p p O W W N N N .�-� .N-� N O O O a a U Z F- w O O O O LO O O O a' (n Z to Ul) LO LO U) r Un n O r U)O V r r' r N r r u7 m M N N N N N N N .�� �aa a� � LO W p r a r r r r r r o LL 1- N Z f- pw U- � LO M N N PLL LO LO O Z {' Z O > � H cr a ti U a w O J M M N N N N N CV M H c' w yr w w (L o o O O N +1 ++ +i -4 a: H w n- p �O 00 a M N Cl. a m 4, J t— U') oa LO c$ 0 N.-i N 010 3 H 10 ++ OwC N N .-f N to N -4 a. to 3NOZ ti ti ti ti ti ti ti {ly H a >. to aH N w 41X 4- X w Z [Oi, 0LO 'IT O 3 O � H OF O wf� a c ca H +) 4 aHi - m � F a i t� rn O Z a at c ro o R o cc o a s 00 Z > cr W -i .i 4J � 3 33 Q a H Iq H >-H H H 3t H H e +3 o f d N ro 0 to 0/ N 0f d � 0/ O � O H pp Z W Z W X t x 4 4 Mc m z .0 CJ o U O U O d V N a) m N tq q U) 0 W W W H W d�W Cow Ow Cw e0lw Colo cd Co Z 0 N a r w .14 O+ c Cl) H H H H H H Q a° Lea A. P. N x N N& N .-7 N Lw N to N h 0.A (r ca H m � > E o 2$ g / w § o o CL § $ J B L a \ D S / w } q � Na1113d 03N G 2 /z cr � p $ §§§ § \ 2� § 0 (nz § in § _ 0R \ \ § } $a2 9 R wcr0 r § ƒƒ0 2 /w ° ƒL / c o _ n § i j \ � § qg } o \ Cl) � m w § G I 0 / u Tr . m \ j a 3N Z % \ gj $ }Q § m c k tea ) w z 4 mwo c § \ k ° k § gb3 c f < E A { G@ § } Lj ƒ # \ � o � < w � R o r k 2/ o 0 z 1 2 10 § � 4 / § (1) LO 14 } z < 2 b § \ 2 e / 0 R 9 2 i NOS d - OlNO S z w R \ \ 8 7� 3 § G ° a U)3 k Q 2 a 2 2 § ® \/� Cl) k Cl) Q } & q } � � cr U)z § \ S § § @ S / @ tD 00S / co § \ \ §§ \ k 0 4 C*4 -D m m m t cr 0 r r to / R p r w CL 0 z ir w 2 $ 2 2 \ 2 \ $ Q j z / we z o _ \J \ d 3 \ g _ . . . � _4 _ w - \ k k cm / �� 44 10 \ mk) k \\ F. § na � � m E CL o ECL qm S = / « U 10 \ gA 2 / \ 3N Z a o 0 0 0 Q 0 0 § � q \j (n w \ \ \ 0 ` wm # § o . ] § / « e J Q t § ) / § 0 z E ; ■ % § § c ~ 3 S ; G c ; # @ § } � A w � � � � m w k � 0 • w km # / q � �t 2e �■ \ $ J2 ° ° ._ © U) z LL §0 m0 \4 /4 ym cm80 o o to ; � 2 � to #k Q0mm k \ \2 k § 29 mR A \ / R /$< « m � } > a LLI D 0 cn ZU) 0 U W H LL N o O z Q 10 v co 0 0 co Q U, ra 0 O w Q z � oa Cl) 0 tr N011113d O to ° ta w 03NJIS z z z 0 Z to� �' a, L � 10 N 10 O w NW 0: C.) N Cl) Cl) N 4 N 10 cn U O to z trWi 8 LO tn toi 8 LO LO NON e e e e w N a o N M N C~7 M N �S N 10 z Nd Q H FLO W- tr p r- t- ti t LO t-- ram- r- Sao �i z � w 0 O 10 10 .0 0 0 0o LU 10 Ln 10 �D TT CD ao N .) -4 Z m H O H Z O i F+ W a •--� F --� C M to 4 a 10 V Q Ej fn N U �a � 0: W d � Y � J � tD a 0 0 4+ a ~O M 10 w 0% ° Ln .1 J fq O o0 aWa 0 e W a 3NOZ ca ra ca ra ca 0 Q ca N wa ow ' ¢ o � N cr w z a 0 w 3 a It0 0 C7 0 Q a C o uE, U14 OppOCrlO Z W C 0-0 a 4.CV Z W Z W 4. 0 O C� V N'0 O t�0y (.c7 n• +- .G Ul .. C O O .0 O 'S' 0> W 'Cl W 0 a L V13C] Q a 1 FC4° o a4.3 F-.0.H1 H H H O �Oy CCJJ (n Z lL •� T+ �C C C7 31 C7 4+ C7 O C7 47 � N80 +N0- w O � 0O M ol GLn c00% TO HO \ 0Ol 0O co -PO too rti0 wawa °)h W ri � N� tr V .i wNr or CC) to CO wO F � F•� ... § § o$ o �k 4 / LL Q n § ƒ z § $ 2 \ ., § (t: � \ o \ w } Ol \ cr NaL113d ; ® 03N G = A z k A E \ co m J®W & ° 2 / / A § \ / . «moo �z § r R g Go ~ �0 § � \ / / } $ak 10 § /E0 N R r » �a. o W to Q LL kw © �� 2 R 2 \ 1-4 \ § / { § ]z § �' Q 91 \ ( g � 3/ § «\ k } k o \ En/ k\ S3 \ \ ir \ E � . 1 S 0 u 3 \ §/ 3N Z o c o * S o § g < § tnd S w � \ \ w z 7GQ R o SS / � e a � a© §o z ) a 2R ° \ @ § } § i Gt § \/ to z j2 f\ wgoo o0' _& \# � 2IE A 00 22 3c } } cr wi 7 c p QN Z� Q � Q ('7 ti � 2 3 00. z Q o O C7 0 O ir a 2 � J pa N O u0i W W NOW Od z m U) m o v y cm 03N6IS > > z y uwi W Fr- S o $ o o g to w p N- cr Cl) N N N N N N N Q U G V. F- w O O O O O O O O O (o Z (o O to 0 Un in do Ul) in C9 Dow t- N CV N N U) M co M m Cl)04 V) Cl) C•1 Cl) z �a a F+ W f' to LO u) in Ln U) in in z a W 0 d d d v v a O LL •o o w .o o Is m H z F- OW 0 to z a Z 0 O T z s s s s a � d G m U Q E7 (o w O 100 } J co OD 00 OD C- W c0 n � m o a, a a O ir f- c0 N O a 0 In-� 10 m N N J a w ¢ 3NOZ m m m m U 0 0 c� zF > U) c� (n ir (n w w z ' oho 0 3 ti� ti� ti � O pq c m cm cm cm a rn o Z .a + a � � -min -4.11 O F O z w •I )6 m N -A N.-3 N .4 a cn Q m .� a m m m m m O N C N r1 N (7 "A U .-4 (7 �4 O a a m+ Z m a m N m c m 0 m b a W �Fpa >p 11 >H co [Nq N t k 3 G C C Ci Q `� 8 OO(J •-4(`� .8 C4 c3 -C -C c U U) Z IL t7 m a w.4 (0) -H to..+ W wi 0 to C9 c-- ,i Ln ..a pp I .a 4- .�4- .� F V) O O)14 c0 -4 a > N 3N I C C � C F cN w CC 0 00 N co m aD to OD m O vd O .-1 O .-I O C! .4 0 -I C] ^4 W V W U W U } cr > c p pQN ZN LO LO OO LO 00 n U w F- lwi N ° F- a. a LO N 0 o a a z F O m a W 0 LL N011113d N N N 03NJIS z z z° z z° F-w y O O O 0 O g Q zNm F- 0 0 0 0 OWw o o N o 0 0 o N S QQ U N N N N N N N N !P O F' ►w 0 0 O O O O 0 O fn 2 LO U') T) Ln LO LO Ln (n:) N N cli ° a'O U) M CO cl M M c cq Nl m Cl) H w m 0 z Q w 0 o e e a 0 10 10 10 10 13 ID IOLL �D H Z LO n to LOLnirw n LO to Cp O t0 z Z O 0 z 0 3 - s s c = F- 0 C U Q C7 N w O J ti r w t� OD r m } m V, m 10 w a a 0 Q d ~O ch .�i �-� .D Ir NN J oa w 3NOZ m m m m m m m m 0 c� zH ? � N U1 a H o to w O W Z oLocr 3 tiM c O 0 -4 C O o Q m w a r- ue k +}+ � z .a • of O Z +; o .� ca o U rz. acL zO Z w C rr H N � U)NQa: mOJaU) m E a H oo w w N tmH0 4- N Hw N GY f a Lc; W 4; 0 [h co co U, UU!a UHc�pp G + � H H U A H N �U .0 Z U- m„4 0 a, a) Qp (7 fV tou) O ,--� :4W 1-) O •14 +i -m g ? +� O+ rl H O tb U 4 10rl.� �.a (0 0 0 -q O O C [[ 0 rl O x G) N rl CV U rl M CY F-^Ln C� 0C ri O m LO am 7 OJ N\O >•co >-CD H CO O CO ¢ aU. CL wU xrjra x ae om zr4 z -4 W cr W pp O QQ) PW O 10 LO N IL Q tO O a h V w h w N U. z 0 o p LL 0 Q o p O <L z h w J o P. N O ,on 0 W U. NOIlVl3d w m m m 03NJIS y. y, y z z y 0 r zym H OD O 8 8 8 e my O O En w W v CV N N EhV M N O rs Q z h w O LOM LO � 9 LOU)Z � U') 8 8 o e • e pwV M MjrV) M N N HBO v v v v v v Q w e o a OLL .o ID h Zh o Ow ro m to Z d N H_ G3 o a N—4 O N 0 p° W 0 ¢ J OD O 00 r N h h m W a O d rn OD J ¢ 3NOZ m as w m m as U w 0 ir 6 ¢ -+ a1t.1 W Z O 1 0 p p e u� o o Q h ro m� e C ro a a m rn O Z a 40 e O ++ N C3 0 F+ O 2 W v sC >. m O Q ro �.y v 7 > C "mv U > Q 02 ? �zz w a f�A U a Q U w 8 CCJ yC7 CC7 N [�7 Woo�Lll Z p oo - .a V 'o E8 N xO to y. 0 ,a N 0 O k •-1 .-i 't cnaa ro`.'D ACD ++ W xO .+ co m co ¢¢w 4 rx a 1-4 '-1 to 1-1 F 14 > ,-4 3 -4 § ir \ P: S 2 Cb § § e o U. qa. J U- § k 2 0 ^ 10 p j / 0 \ j j m 0 w 2 r N@21d , 03�2 / / / Z§c / 8 \ / S DOW — %§LL \ \ q§ � 10R R « / 00 § \ § \ g $3 2 ® R 2 CN m � \ ir§ 0 1-4 \ \ \ � ° %0 10 2 §U. j j \ � � \ LO LO \ z a � 0 , § ) _ cd/ ] / (D S \ k / °2 to § 2 k \ § \ \3 # « � cn w � - e © ■ 0 E 0 _ q e cy, m j\ 3N Z m m m m Aj ' oo - \k § § i 2, a 4 } §$ k \ Sc 2-,A / )� , r c o 0 « ] 0 ° 3 ■� tc k cc @U \} � \/ fd - L) /\ -� L)§ « @ 0 k@ - & \6 EGGS 5 « e # Qr on « 0 em >104 � . . } > � j 0w rn LO Q LO LO � N N N V U W 0 0 Z M M a ZO .i p 0 a z H N N ¢ _W O CO R 0 O N C7 cr N011113d a C13NDIS r z r z z 9 0 CN ZCWA� ITS o M 0 0 :I NJ W p CV 0* �+'IL � N N .�� h N 10 N a Q Cl) ite H W O O OD O O O. O O t� O (n z ) O Cl) rn 00 u7 v o d (n =) CO o z OQQ HW H L t[1 if/ to A If1 If) Z F-W O v v V v v v a 0 .o \ o .o z H rn N .LA- �� 0 W LU O 9T C N t��} N O OO LL W co m LO Lr) V N LO N o r- 0 A N f {i � s s z _O 1- ~ P, m ro H H m Q W 3 ? ? O n. r V N In W 00 r N La W o p J v v v v o } m Ra d' ¢ a w . r, 0 A 0 a a d 0 `3 o n c�v J ao co rn �+Jra r H 00 H H c°W W F F+ 3NOZ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ w ¢ w 0 c� z > N (n a r ¢ fn W a Q W Z 04 o a 0 p ro to U ro A m g V � 0000 $ z F. Q 07 N to $ y ,L! O. to y am o a o Hgo a 7 au) a -4 c m �aHsi a �aNai E¢owN 0 Z C -4 HO 3oNp�N PN 7N k0 -H0 (1 ¢ ¢ ir. Ck r > ir zN o 0 o S 0 0 aLO LO LO LO Lf) U w f- twi N a z 0 O cr ti a z F N a w O a: w N011113d m �, 03NDIS N z° z° z° zO zNpr O S S 0 0 S COH 0 w LL a Ld� N O N N d) N M N N N U a O 0 O lid z irN N � N N CV N f cn C) 10 CO Co .\o C ro a air0 LO LO LO v v T �a � \o 10 o 0 0 zF w 0 LO LO o LO ti ,0O z -� z 0 N H C a U E .\O U a to a a w 4 O Y Cl) Cn7 M Cl) Cl) C7 M Cl) J F m w 0- 0 a: .� J o ax c) H K 3NOZ m w w w 0 arw � w Z c 0 in 3 0E O V < C 0 H L) O U a F A .H a aFrn O Z !+ a A A c-0v m UOtoO Z w V mrD ?. CV +. Lt = CCi a 0 x m x >. O ?C o x C\D N x F-� !X a ti 0 H 0 o e -4 v. C> -4 O Cq C O M C 0 2 Z gig LL. 4 .C4 N O .a 4 O C V Q! v �� aa < 7 O Uo a a 4+ co > 0 H U) � (Dam 03 -4 Hems' ^o W >+ O ¢Hoz N Q - xf� N + � c m0 s g c o � o o .io o -4 -4 . . 3N � Nm� N a �L40 P U wC �i a. L: � } w o 2 2§ 2 \ 2 J L) W / � & \ 2 k o \ .3 h \ -i LO e 2 } 10 LC) W) / 0: Na1113d ® 03N S A 0) G t- z U)m E & 8 8 E b R w� Li / / / § k S U. cr C14 Cl) a w ¥ «« u F 2 k / R 2 2 \ E° b / \ \ § / o$ 4 - !w\ g g % g ir a 0 2 G 2 2 U) LO 0w W � R / R 2 \ z z g § 2 / G g 4 Q V A -i m % % % � m w § g a 0 co m Q c a \ } 3N z m m m m § R * § \ cn Lu z L) § ° / § 0 ® moo- o o a ® \ « ¥ § 4 §I= 2 § tX x ka \ U « -- 0 4Dq @@ /} u E Qk @/ �2 � k co }w \z � W k \ � & \ j§ \ /\ - § « « wa. o cn04 mN # a > ( \ 2\ / S 7 R 2 0 z © § e � / LLJ LLJ L z \ E z 2 8 B it 4 = e u Ir w E ? 2 R Ir N01±13 d 03N 2 \ £ 0 z§� p ? 2 2 G S @ R 8 R aCnu - %§ j / / �\ / \ �U. � § m z § / $ 2 S % S 2 / § E 0 § 2 k \ \ 0 \ @ R 8 $■ m R g n n 2 m m n a « « w w e a a n � n if) � n 2 e E 0 - - It - # - - a. 0 2 J 2 3 2 2 2 Q 3 0 u j / 7 R \ 3 R g 2 au \z § § f G . _ . ) 1-4 \ % \ W _ CD � a % § 0 7 G A j § 1-410 0\ § w § §\ J § % 3NO z m m m m = = m = m % / / q w ® § $ w z / \ } k K S ° 0 4 ° . , . § \} � § \ Fq � �� �� j� \ � \ / � \ 094 k w q . wk Nk - , @@ = k u ( > @ _\ § 0 4 § o.\ o - � 2 =I °$ §#- « +1 � 2_ /§ �_ Jw 2- 2w �Z nR§ © 4- m _* cw rQ ;m ;m ;G 2» .w / /§) � \ \ \ jj \4 \ \ -4 § ® j - § j/ « «� kn mm o � ow mn GN GN Qa m � } Ir Z3 pp QQ s 10 L O � Z D U W Q ua F IwL N o0 z a z 0 a O J w O o U. N0I1113d 03NJIS v o 01, a o a o G Z N a Fes- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W w 0 O O O O O e e U W N N N N N M N CVN Qa U � O p p (n Z 0 �Lu O LO � N LO O O O O LO LO LO CA 7 N o ° 00 o �Q a `l Cl) 04 cl M Cl)N M Cl)N � M z z aW e ° ° Z a O o o .o 10 i- z � Ow Er w O O O O O O O O O IL IL Ul) LO IA LO an \D LO LO If) E z Z O U a a S = e a o r N a 0 � En a x w H a W d � O a O rn rn 3 `d o 0 m N N N '-4 N N N> a N an Q z w3NOZ m � w m � a > N U) a a� w z o � 0 0 0 a r a Z ti ti �i ti ti ti C3O O Z W ..s�GA H O d cS k p� .x 3 sE � .X S �C 3 N ti H N O 19 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O O O i �ty cz w a m"o aC t3 rov mz� m �o rob ro ac c p+a[-. a h_ m had h m h m h ro h ro h � o a; ..+ .,-4 y LV U a V) U) U) X U) L G]. N w ..M Ufn Z LL N � andy� NN N� N �CA N� �A m E D W O O 4. 4 O � 8 � ada O 4Y s�Cdd k. •.mod �C -1-a �4i N F-a (Af3iw m0 NO m0 NO m0 NO y da0 =rt0 aC< W W 7 wqT WIt W V Lu WaW ii. M M } � � e to ZO$N Z LO � 00 o LO 1- 00 rn a .--I N a � U ww F- w H ti W u0 0 F- cq d 0 tD 0 0 cr a � J O a:as W O OD x N0I1113d O a 0 03NJIS z z° z z° z z z° Z�� 8 O O N O U O O O HH o O o r- LO Op n O C14 LL. N N Ok 00 to Q M QQ U w pp ~ w 0 0 O .M-i � O t O t/I Z 0 Oco O w N NCY) O O [� Om to U a w ~ in Z Q w 0 o e a d OW .o 10 `0 .0 ID .0 .o 10 10 zF- 0w e X w LO LO w 0 LO r- 000 rn .Oo U. LL. H N .ti '-I -4 to C m Z a Z O co LO O H U 4N } O U S N p; W o Y } J H m w a O `O tY } w U Q d 0 N N -4 00 01) � °N a .-4 J O Z a 3NOZ w m w m w w m w w w 0 O H x 04 to Ir ° 6 a z w x 0 O 0 ° e4 WCC1 cQ7. C=(-Y� LLGUO11fyy CN�NO 7O-b Z Qa ZaQ -7 41 I 4' r�l cdw N m m mw 0 a: cm CD Oe N mx k 7 F `D C C 41 CZ a a a. Q W W to InO .-I °O ri -N 1 wsW mZ mza m LnW C CW Ow W CY U) gg �J Z W v a 3 3 3 m m. 1 O bra cn 0 O WN NN W N Q) N Q04 00"~O [-a U) 0: a: rl O wi O H M H M H M H o.-4 i0 OT of m ? OD 6Q94C]. WM WM W M fa. M lj. M COIa. :E xN � N xN v r > cr U) 03 10 � 10 � 00 0 10 rn ZN p z -� Q F d U W F- a a Q a Z LD N ° w a: a O w z J LO CW7 O It Cl. W 0 to i U. N011113d N 03NJIS o o v O o v o 0 zuwi� cn o 8 0 0 0 0 OWH W I zz v v N v uN,U. v ° OD m rn w m a o F' W O N Z (n � O N O 0o � I o r S 8 0 0 o c�Q a M c`° co Cl) z H cr 0 v v v to v v v z d w Q o o e o a �dw 10 o 0 0 0 0 0 0w LO crw r o LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 U. w LC) a,.o .o L .o 00 10 i N c Cy z H z 0to m 04 F- x O -i N Q � as w O X Q r J F- m w N N a o �A Cl) .-1 z N .-i 0 00. ~O r vi lk o 0 0 0 N.tea o J \ ea N o 0 0 Cl) N4+ .N V) N N O U) Z U) .-i U] a O Z w3NOZ m m m m m m m m m w 0 c� z > ccq In a: N U) a W z O O o ri a F- m o aNi 0o0 a s N o > N o � ` m m � w a � � "W A a n ° v � w e r_ - cz > c . w lA C��t U a A a G a�Fa+ttahAe xa {� 7 CZ W 'OWC 3 RA.Wi @ m O VA O OO � CO k -1 10 v•�•W y�c 01� Gv -Ni O p � N wa •-10 !!0 Cl) N .i $ W.i CO Wcq } cr w (A Z� r 0 z N Q U w � W H O o O ? oca a 0 � Cl) O di z � jv rn w 0 ° c0v r- w LL N011113d a N 03NJIS >. z z w cn o o co zN� ►- S o N 0 Owe04 acr Q Q co U O CC) O w O t� n t- N z fA % W O o In O 0 c) Q Q I` C H CV N w cr F' to to L Q w O Itt a: d 0 Z H tt D o w LL LL N lM C a) Z H tJ7 �i n z O ¢ u aa) a a _ 0 is P p m a O U N a w � X � J H w 0- 0 d 0 rn rn 0 J a O 2 a 3NOZ w w w w W u< 0 Z N cr a e-+ N w w z cr w�N p O ¢ o Q 00 O w a° � ao z cr z w H Q Q ss roH o co }}dLA Q CW CW CpWpp ..W . .-�W 00 Z .Q N —4-4 to C14 � O � O ¢¢ Vx 06 N mod at Cl) } cV City of Fort Worth, Texas Mayor and Council Communication DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving at Seven Loca- PAGE NUMBER tions on the Northeast Side, 12/14/64 C-423 Project No. 097-24000-128 1of 3 Council action on the project described below is requested. Project Description Nature of Work: Assessment paving at the following locations: Roadway R.O.W. Width Width Fisher Street West end of Fisher to Sylvania 26' 45" Greer Street West end of Greer to Samuels 26' 40' Carver Street Maple to Leota 30' 50' Alley 2400 Block of Dell to Lillian 10' 12 Gilcrest Drive Yucca to Primrose 30' 56' Warwick Avenue Grover to Deen 30' 50' Elinor Street 28th Street to Beach 30' 50' Fisher and Greer Streets are proposed for 26 foot wide paving because of reduced .right-of-way width available and because both streets dead end as shown on the attached map. Existing improvements, such as water meters, curbs and sidewalks at some locations, are aligned for a 26 foot roadway. Submission of Bids Date bids received: September 1, 1964 Bidder Amount Bid Working Days Texas Bitulithic Company $76,627.50 72 Glade, Inc. 77,290.00 72 R. W. Gibbins, Inc. 782916.25 72 General Construction Company 792169.40 72 W. E. Brittain, Inc. 862274.75 72 Project Cost and Financing In accordance with standard assessment paving policies, the Public Works D partment has estimated the City's portion of the construction, engineering a d miscellaneous costs to be $42,584.88, and the property owners ' share to b $41,705.37. The project includes the paving of an alley between Dell and Lillian Streets, as petitioned by 100 per cent of the adjacent property o ers, all of whom qualify for side lot credits, resulting in an assessment o $708 (43.8 per cent of the total project cost) and a City contribution of $ 07.35 (56.2 per cent of the total project cost). The alley proposed for paving from Dell to Lillian is an exception to the general nature of alleys. It is relatively short in length and sides on four properties, whereas an alley usually is at the rear of ten or more properties. Another consideration in the paving of alleys is that the City Waste Disposal Service benefits from the improvement. DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving at Seven Loca- PAGE 12/14/64 NUMBER C-423 or tions on the Northeast Side, 2 3 Project No. 097-2.4000-128 Assessment paving of alleys has been infrequent in recent years. This project is the second proposed by the Public Works Department during 1964. The first was an alley from Byers to Bryce Street between Hulen and Western, which the City Council deleted upon the request of half of the adjacent property owners on May 4, 1964 (M&C C-288). All adjacent property owners approve this proposed paving, but the relatively high City cost for the pending project indicates that some review of the policy for alley paving on the assessment basis might be desirable. Inquiries made to other cities in this area revealed that one city pays one-third of the cost and abutting property owners on either side of the alley pay one-third each (Dallas) . Another city which has recently un- dertaken the paving of about 40 blocks of alleys charges 100 per cent of the construction cost to the abutting property owners, and contributes only engineering and supervision (Mesquite). The City Council may wish to consider a change in policy to provide that an amount ranging between 67 and 100 per cent of the total, construc- tion cost of alley paving be assessed against adjacent property owners and that the City pay for engineering and supervision of construction. If the City Council desires to make such a policy change applicable to the pending project as well as to future alley projects, the four property owners adja- cent to the alley in the Z40-0 block between Dell and Lillian will be notified by mail prior to the Benefit Hearing regarding an increase in the amount of the assessment. Recommendations 1) That the 'following bond fund transfers be approved: Amount From To Purpose $42,584.88 097-24000-901 097-24000-128 City's portion of con- Seven Locations struction engineering Northeast Side and miscellaneous expenses. $41,705.37 Revolving Fund 042-09724-128 Property Owners' por- Seven Locations tion of construction Northeast Side cost. 2) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Declaring the necessity for and ordering the improvements on the streets as specified above; b) Making provisions for the levying of assessments; DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving at Seven Luca- PAGE NUMBER C-423 tions on the Northeast Side, ft_ 12 14 64 Project No. 097-24000-128 — e c) Directing the Public Works Department to prepare estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; d) Awarding the contract to Texas Bitulithic Company, on its low bid of $76,627.50, for the improvements named above. 3) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Approving the estimates of costs and amounts proposed to be assessed; b) Setting January 4, 1965, as the date of the Benefit Hearing. JLB:GA The following summaries are attached: Attachment "A" - Resume of the project Attachment "B" - Distribution of cost and assessments, and results of post card survey Attachment "C" - Assessment Rolls in alphabetical order SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSITION COUNCIL: � I PROCEED BY PPROVED W16THER (DESCRIBE)/ /(`�/►'/�ii(, Ol a.A i e6 CA 40,,J�e• triG�y�f 0 nlvie'"n C1 -* C CS 3. /-r CITY SECRETARY 4 i) o/ A'-o/e A'9 q��d.P �✓ 16.¢O. e,.^ DATE CITY MANAGER