Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5598 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVID- ING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF N.E. 30th STREET AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CONTRACT TO TEXAS BITULITHIC COMPANY FOR THE MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBT- EDNESS THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESS- MENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS.THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CER- TIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE ESTIMATES;DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSE- QUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE FORTIETH LEG- ISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106, COMMONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDI- NANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth,Texas, has prepared Plans and Speci- fications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been examined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all matters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I. The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and adopted. IL There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter described portions of streets, av- enues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, to-wit: 1. N.E. 30th STREET: From Weber Street to Lulu Street, known and designated as Unit 1, Project 104-24000-149. 2. N.E. 30th STREET: From Lulu Street to Schwartz Avenue, known and designated as Unit 2, Project 104-24000-149. 3. N.E. 30th STREET: From Hale Avenue to Runnels Avenue, known and designated as Unit 3, Projec* 104-24000-149. 4. N.E. 30th STREET: From Runnels Avenue to Grover Avenue, known and designated as Unit 4, Project 104-24000-149. 5. N.E. 30th STREETS From Grover Avenue to Deen Road, known and designated as Unit 5, Project 104-24000-149. 6. N.E. 29th STREET: ,From Schwartz Avenue to Oscar Avenue, known and designated as Unit 6, Project lo4-24000-149. 7. Salisbury Avenue: From Hale Street to Grover Avenue, known and designated as Unit 7, Project 104-24000-149. 8. JONES STREET: From Central Avenue to 20th Street known and designated as Unit 8, Project 104-24000-149. 9. Rouse Street: From Blandin Avenue to Emma Avenue, known and designated as Unit 9, Project 104-24000-149. III Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas,shall be improved by raising,grading,and filling same and by constructing thereon the following,to-wit: 1. N.E. 30th STREET: From Weber Street to Lulu Street, known and designated as Unit No. 1, Project No. 104-24060-149, a,6-inch Hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement.on a 30-foot roadway. 2. N.E. 30th STREET: From Lulu Street to Schwartz'Avenue, known and designated as Unit 2, .,Project No. 104-24000-149, a ,6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 3. N.E. 30th STREET: From Hale Avenue to Runnels Avenue, known and designated as Unit 3, Project No. 104-24000-149, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 4. N.E. 30th STREET: From Runnels Avenue to Grover Avenue known and designated as.Unit 4, Project No. 104-24000-149, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. . . 5. N.E. 30th STREET: From Grover Avenue to Deen Road, known and designated .as Unit 5, Project No. 104-24000-149, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 6. N.E. 29th STREET: From Schwartz Avenue to Oscar Avenue, known and designated as Unit 6, Project 104-24000-149, a 6-inch hot' mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 7. SALISBURY AVENUES From Hale Street to Grover Avenue, known and designated as Unit 7, Project No. 104-24000-149, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 8. JONES STREET: From Central Avenue to 20th Street, known and designated as Unit 8, Project No. 104-24000-149, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. 9. ROUSE STREET: FromBlandin Avenue to Emma Avenue, known and designated as Unit 9, Project No. 104-24000-149, a 6-inch hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30-foot roadway. The above,together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurten- ances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor. IV. The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as follows, to-wit: A. The property abutting on that portion of the street, avenue or public place and the real and.true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine- tenths (9/10ths) of the estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements. B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said improvements after deduct- ing the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A. The amounts payable by the.abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners thereof and shall constitute a first and prior lien upon such properties and a personal liability of the real and true owners thereof, and shall be payable, to-wit: When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular unit,the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become payable in five (5) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of such completion and acceptance,and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such installments after the date of completion and acceptance of such respective unit. The entire amount assessed against the particular parcels of property shall bear interest from the date of such completion and acceptance of the improvements on the unit upon which the particular property abuts at the rate of six (8%o) per cent per annum,payable annually except as to interest on the first installment,which shall be due and payable on the date said installment matures, provided that any owner shall have the right to pay any and all of such installment at any time before maturity by paying princi- pal with interest accrued to the date of payment, and further provided if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns,the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immediately due and payable; but it is specifically provided that no assessment shall in any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special benefits to property in the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing provided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case until after notice of hearing as pro- vided by law. Said assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed in the name of the City of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaining the right to authorize payment of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such com- pleted and accepted unit.in not more than_torty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than$9.00 each, the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than 30 days after the completion and acceptance by the City of the particular unit, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby em- powered to authorize payments of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payment shall be authorized only in instances where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful,valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms there- of of the sums assessed against such property. The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the City Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon. and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments, or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, and the name of the owners, as far as known,and shall contain such other recitals as may be pertin- ent thereto, and shall further recite substantially that all proceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability of the owners there- of, have been regularly had, done and performed, and such recitals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substan- tially that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together wtih reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which, as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior lien against the property,superior to all other liens and claims except State,County, School District,and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall invalidate any assessment or any certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not invalidate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto. vI. Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and the bid of TEXAS BITULITHIC COMPANY _ , having been found to be the lowest and best bid for the making and construction of said improvements,the contract therefore is hereby awarded to TEXAS BITULITHIC COMPANY , at and for the prices stated in the Proposal of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department, which said report and recom- mendation is on file with the City, the City Manager, and City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the name of the City of Fort Worth,Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things,the prices for the work. VII. To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by said contract. there is hereby appropriated out of available funds and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pap said indebtedness so incurred. VIII. The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, which law has been adopted as an amend- ment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas,and under which law these proceedings are taken and had. IX. Each unit above described shall be and constitute a separate and independent unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be made for the improvements in each unit according to the cost of the improvements in that unit and according to the benefits arising from the improvements in that unit. X. In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it shall not be necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall be valid. XL The Director of Public Works of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is hereby, ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of such improvements in each unit,in accordance with the terms of the powers and provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas. XII. The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County Clerk of Tarrant County,Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature.of the State of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature, said Act having been passed in the year 1930,and now shown as Article 1220a of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. XIII. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. XIV. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS__.__ _____.._DAY OF _ __ 19_ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney i -j is W �• � bn A t;. .o I I, ,.. 1 .. t 1. i.. t_'t,`•.J .. �' �. ( /s sr. ,f 3zrlo ,.IAID • I"—_ I f ss /o J I __, .. - R✓S S r V &I A C,O UZ n 14 43 '='^t //•Jl i � - /1 � � •/� �l2.'y. v, 7 `\ i � 4 t' �. 7 � I .. .i r4 !J I . /O I ' s �f f /0 •`/ .i! -0 1 9 d I t .J t h �cUlet�� 1� �„�„�,�; � �.. + PROJECT 104-24000-149 LEGEND PRESENTLY PAVED - 7 __ �_; � _•.._� _ .� _ ___�-__-��•----.--- DIRT OR GRAVEL / v PROPOSED PAVING UNITS 1 AND 2, N.E. 30th a. "r '°:a - ,:a j! STREET PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY PETITION OR POLL C4-,D SURVEY /y�� NOT OPPOSED a' �l/ PAVl- G - _. ___.. Jn,> /'>i_: i� JdU I ��2,i� •V FT. �, 1 _ J- .. •_ WO��xi - `<, NOT SHADED IS G22 ,.-D TO PAVING �l i I I � i•• 1 ,� l PROJECT 104-24000-149 LEGEND PRESENTLY PAVED DIRT OR GRAVEL } � 4 PROPOSED PAVING UNITS 3 4 ' AND 5, N.E.30th 1 I STREET •ro i _-- r� �7/; PROPERTY REPRESENTED B5i PETITION OR POLL CARD SURVEY OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED TO PAVING OWNERSHIP NOT SHADED IS J OPPOSED TO PAVING i r> li u j ' =r 1 fo -_i � � - ry• � ra ; � `� , ST f -M1 l L r �F/� _ -• f �• M /t 1 I3 !•( f1 rd ow 30 Th TO-I.-r ` yyy 4 7 S.Ccii Ac. lcXAs EcEC7' it I N �J rD 4 3 { 10 iflkrl; Ir I ji , 11---------i H 6 1 „ I :u I �� I er%:r i i�1a r 3�/To/ � •r l-a-----•-� SSSJ! rou of i —v.-,. Vr '4 /t �• ./ � �, �� /r / h /J r C h �: /t � .�° A � s—� r` •%--1 M1F i e s 91 "Z$ y �^ 4- F '—g y'F q' ,o i w to j 1 7 I to i r• j J � TH 1 �02.1 0 DIAMOND HILL r OL Z ` l � ; �• S Y � r/ I t I , � n r a n r. ZO Z A W.0 PROJECT 104-24000-149 ,r LEGEND - - •. ----- — /� # « ��,1 ,r I 1 PRESENTLY PAVED DIRT OR GRAVEL o�/: ,� M �' PROPOSED PACING UNIT 6 --_ I N.E. 29th STREET !�1' /r y i—_• A PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY PETITION OR POLL CARD SURVEY OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED TO PAVING p�flrlAl RECp .a•1NERSHIP NOT SHADED IS • . -_ Or_OSED TO _.WING� un�AeV FT. WORTH TEX. i PROJECT 104-24000-149 _�• i 1 N ^' LEGEND • 1 i f �� � •` ` �� ! � ' � F-•" I=`'` _ PRESENTLY PAVED r� 4 I { DIRT OR GRAVEL n ED 71 PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 7 E SALISBURY AVENUE p Z r PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY rr cI I$ PETITION OR POLL CARD SURVEY OWNi;RSHIP NOT OPPOSED TO PAVING ' • /r r rr Q�}Tj�1ERSFIIP NOT SIiP1�PD IS OPPOSED TO PAVING 13 f , It- 16 , ,; �.J• ,.+ ''1 r Iwi of w � •. r�o �. AA /^� J:t /Fi Irri !►� /^j rri Ls Jr. /e: /i.► /a0 !!0 7� �n i �i�YGt 'w _• _ _ ^r ::�...�{p r •ti b .r e T Lli s �; `� 4 1 --. i ` ` ; ' ! j! /1 ra y// 1,/. 3 Pn � N-� I•f rJ : � // r>y fr r. ft ,{ j u: /.r N ro to ry /S !s• /A � if H U /2 i/ ' I � i 11 8 � �`t ` . -� • _ _. _ /rion • - .-_........ _ .__....._..________.....�......_,____._----•--��'_- Ara---- OND ; 4 r ,J j v ^. '• �' ��`` '/' �l :I, ,� �1 J' �r, 'h$?���`+ �9;t 1 I� 'j9 a s ♦ i +' � � I •T r7 � �• r. !v +I•f 1J A'+ ` Lam, „! JR•j. rl� ielf Pit4 t •� J, / � ., ,•ti;.10 ry.� � /J /1 ��'f�r �++ ," '' J\.i liY �`' 'i',i9 , i ^' � i;i i a �•.i' �7! I J ,� t ` +jL :,< �'. MIR ORTH Rij ��� �..�`�r �•, �`' � .,^ ��'`:� �.c �a '� . e �,/ � " ` Ave '.. •1••,�,Ria '�.:f Q ��T'd S' � e a_3..�.� !01 r.r ie 1 N .41 ---------------- ST de ri it 11 7-71A 'Ile 71 1 i I r I •F -�iIFFFYY''•'''F"F ! ,r •.i r•• i . t- -- - - " '� ^mil.•-'' 55z o PROJECT 104-24000-149 LEGEND ! PRESENTLY PAVED I DIRT OR GRAVEI, o to V �ti y1 PROPOSED Pa.VING UNIT Z �� JONES STREET 7 20 f! 4 ROPERTY REPRESENT.. e zTITI,Okj OR POLL SURVEY /1r'J OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOS TO PAVING(rdN * �v� \� •9 �� ER IP NOT 311ADED IS �' OPPOSED TO P 6 4 AVING �' ti'' 9 1 4 ti� v ld, 9 s /' n , ` PR03ECT lOG-24000-149 NOBLE LEGEND ESQ -� (f'�- - - —�•'— — PRESENTLY PAVED 14 _1s 4��n,.—� DIRT OR GRAVEL IS G 6— PROPOSED P.WING UNIT 9 - --� ROUSE STREET la L:J l f Li7 lc - W 7 1 U) '/' PROPERTY REPRESENTED Bpi PETITION OR POLL CARD zo -_ 9__-) I SURVEY -,w 21 fo { i0 -1 OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED f i SSURG ,, . '� PLACE — � iz �` '� 1 � „��1z a I r._ �1—t����•�7� `;`� r JNERSHIP NOT SHADED IS OPPOSED TO PAVING 13 {{ 2 I I! r (2 r _.Ii }'r'3_ ��I r.•�4.• �----13�'_` Imo• . Is IV HY. ION -4- 10 T N Itl h 10— Ca S7. O�—w` tau „i tee t4i_"""�-1 F--_--' .it 262i 2c t0 ; ? ' G �'10 , 9 8 T 6 6 5 13 TR.267 � TR.2i2 3 { 4 5 1�2 3 4 5 '^' 14 I 6 15 n cz n 6 1G G i---:r—�b } . j z 4 1 -t z 1. �`'—� .- � Silt �o �, :�• j i9 ,� ( +i � d � . 2p :n 22 r 268 4 5 = 21 i _" _.. .. �."_._..... —" .a t Ftl p �o _ t.s �.e I p • J w a 1 WORD SECRUARY IF:wq , TEx. i . 4 i z Home for y: t, 291h t __ ��"! h 00 0 f7' 2_ to h ! Ui17L]f! I IRI()N r � i' .;IL'Stock y ! Mount Olivet } r.. �fv�xRrli(l�AV _ "1� / L() Z .� 1 I t f Yurds t =its � J 4 a'� p r-' r / 1 cu ' _ 2S1 ter' R m` v _, r a w w of Y I; c`x Cemetery' HDu t ,� � �. > > 1 North S;de © ' ° CHi T`"j' wA t r -;- `l,f �oliseunl eRA�ryAW V ` ` r LOTuWATAUGIt W RD. m cr t ,� rn \ r OLD 3 L07US_�-i�AVr. 1 >ELiti ' EXCAANGE f a y N t TRAIL R��. MORE �, f �: S� PFIPEGDAE ZI u \r AJc' X DRIVERS 'L GIDR'L c_�GOLDE'v&QO0- AlE.t NF +(F O ( U j i *9' m IGOI DENRC S N ` PARK �. ��. a ASTER 4> i c7 73 0 .'3rd 7J o m" , PN� pAlSv U t' y Y�cl. z �CF TlGWAvc . GARNcA TlO w - HONE SUCKLE AVMX ` } HONEYSU( ¢ F�JRffOLD AVEARIGOLD C ¢ ?I � \\\1 v, y _ AO PRIMROS C tnPoo! g E M MA PARK , c. WE5T3ROOKI W AVE. ' ,L.<��N c�'l G °�, - `'`' i��h �,•y ^� i DALFORDc'1- b�r~~3 JEFF I �F'! LILLIAN LI !v lilt2D s a�~ ?J_� JOZ k,\�;r\• t I 1 op \ L 7ELl� DELL C EMERY PLACE IRGIVIA CT. w� Q P.tURf McLEMpRE x eu,Ho�titc \1 L f RAGE ` ilcLEM ;,'F E R S �� C,2� ` T `4�Cle}t• L e l GI US a OdkWO r Cem. t. )� \ < PAR '` 'Y""." �y-_ y�.ca • g4[ S OTT ---PFoneer I �" �� / -> . --�•- �;I LOCATIOU MAP 2 ,VL} T vI G AT 9 I OC T ON T14t MORTHSIDE PUBLIC WORkS {' EVIGIMEERMG DEPARTMCWT DIVISIOw AU M. GRA14AM A. L. READER JR. DIR.CTOR CHIEF i.[YGIUEER O 00, 9 OffiRlAt RECORD CITY S01 ECRc7ARY FT. WORTH TEX. ATTACHMENT "Be' Page 1 of 10 9 Locations on the North Side Project No. 104-24000-149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 57,099.70 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 5,709.97 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................E 62,809.67 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... 3,814.0 67.4 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 1,842.0 32.6 TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ................................... 5,656..0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 27,038.68 43.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 13,102.04 X.9 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................E40,140.72 63.9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED............................................................................................... 10,748.72 17.1 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 29�392.00 46.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE....................... .................................................. ....................03s41.7.67 5 3.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 5,656.0 2,187.0 PER CENT 100.0 38.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 79 39 PER CENT 100.0 49.4 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 70 35 RESULTS OF POST CARID PER CENT 100.0 50.0 SURVEY ARE AVAX LE UPON REQUEST. OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 55 26 PER CENT 100.0 47.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 15 9 PER CENT 100.0 60.0 ATTACEMENT "B" PAGE 2 of 10 N.E. 30th STREET WEBER TO LULU UNIT 1 PER PROJECT 104-24000-149 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 4$034000 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 403.40 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................$ 4,437.40 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 432 a o 10)0 0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. —0m —0;— TOTAL FOOTAGE........ .................................. 432.0 130 0 0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT---............... ...................... 1 39075084 6903 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... mom —0-1 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED........................................................................................$ 3,075o84 69.3 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 915.84 20 0 6 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 29160.00 48.7 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. .....................................................i 2F,277.40 5 e 3 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 432.0 324.0 0 108.0 PER CENT 100.0 7 5 0 0 CA 2 S.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 3 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 -4 75.0 0.0 23.0 r� NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 3 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 H 75.0 0"0 25.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 3 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 100,0 0.0 0,0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 0 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 fT R�7QRY ATTACHMENT "B" N.E. 30th STREET PAGE 3 of 10 LULU TO SCHWARTZ UNIT 2 PROJECT 104-24000 a 149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 59484.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 548.45 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 6.032.95 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 472.0 0 0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE,............................ -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 472.0 I00.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT....................................................-$ 3,360.64 55 a 7 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... -0- -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................E 3,360.64 55.7 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1 a 2w.64 19.9 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 2 9160.00 35.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................$3 9 872.,95 64.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 472.0 344.0 O 128,& PER CENT 100.0 72.9 0.0 2 .1 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 3 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 75 0 O.0 25.O H NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 3 O 1 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 25.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 3 O 1 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 0.0 25,.GI OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 01 0 0.0 ATTACHMENT 1 B" N.E. 30 th STREET PILE 4 of 10 HALE TO RUNNELS UNIT 3 PROJECT 104-2-4000-149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 4 821 50 ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 482.15 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$ 5,303.65 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................. . 520 e 0 1.0(0�,0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE............................. —0— TOTAL FOOTAGE........ _......................... ..... 520.0 10000 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 3,702.40 69.8 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.._................................................ —0— GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED........ ................................................................................$ 31702040 69.8 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 11 762.40 33.2 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT.......... ..................................................................................................................... 11940.00 36.6 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......................................................................................................3 39363065 6304 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVINO PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 520.0 130.0 0 390,10 PER CENT 100.0 25.0 000' 75 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 25 0 0 0 75.(C E-a NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 25 0 0 0.0 75.0 E-e OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 25.0 0.0 7 5�0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.fu ATTA NT "Bol PAGE 5 of 10 N o E o 30 th STREET RUNNELS TO GRO ER UNIT 4 PER PROJECT 104-24000-149 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 49959a e'5 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 495 e 97 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 5,455 0 72 1O�o RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 520�O 100 o 0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. .......................... —Om ,,O_, TOTAL FOOTAGE...... .................._........... 520.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.................... .... ... .... 39702.40 67.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... —0— GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..,...... ..._.... ....................................................................S 3y702.40 67�9 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1 m 652.40 3O.3 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT............................................................................................... ............................... 2 O50 C 3 r o NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. ......................... .........................E 3,405.72 62�4 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 520,0 13O,O 130,O 26 C,.�Q) PER CENT 1OO e O 25.0 25,0 50 0, PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 25 O 25.O 5 C-4 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 49 1 1 2 PER CENT IW O 25.0 25.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 1 1 PER CENT 10O o O 25 o O 25.0 51011,0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE O O O O PER CENT M 0.01 0.0 0.0 OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY ET, NORTH, Tm ATTACHMENT "B" N.E. 30th STREET ' PAGE 6 of 10 GROVER TO DEEN UNIT 5 PROJECT 104-24000-149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 41590.75 ENGINEERING ....................................................................................................... 459.07 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 5,049.82 1W O RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 500.0 100�0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. m0. -0- TOTAL FOOTAGE... .... ..................... ......... 500,0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 3,560.00 70.5 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... m0e -0- GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.... ........ ........................................................................_s 3,560.00 70.5 LESS CREDITS GRANTED...................................._......................................................... 1,413.20 28.0 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT........................................................... ?,146.80 42.5 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. ........................... .........................5 2,903.02 57.5 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 500.0 0 -:50..0 250 O PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50,0 A PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 Q 0 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 H 0.0 50.0 50.0 H NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 1 0 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 F-1 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 U 0 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All? dry r ATTACHMENT "B" N.E. 29th STREET PAGE 7 of 10 SCHWARTZ TO OSCAR UNIT 6 PROJECT 104-24000-149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 4,852.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 485.20 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 5,337.20 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 420.0 75.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 140.0 25.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ................................... 560.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 2,990.40 56.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 996.80 18.7 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED............................................................-..........................i 3,987.20 74.7 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1,700.40 31.9 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 2,286.80 42.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................i 3,050.40 57.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 560.0 560.0 140.0 280.0 140.0 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 4 1 2 1 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 4 1 2 1 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 3 3 1 2 0 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 1 0 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 0.0 0 100.0 ATTACIMENT "B" SALISBURY AVENUE PAGE 8 of 10 HALE TO GROVER UNIT 7 PROJECT 104-24000-149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 14,313.00 ENGINEERING ....................................................................................................I......... 1,431.30 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 15,744.30 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 500.0 50.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 500.0 50.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................1,000.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT..................---...---...........................i 3,560.00 22.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 39560.00 22.6 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 7)120.00 45.2 LESS CREDITS GRANTED............................................................................I................... 860.00 5.5 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 69260.00 39.7 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i 9,484.30 60.3 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,000.0 600.0 150.0 400.0 450.0 PER CENT 100.0 60.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 20 12 3 8 9 PER CENT 100.0 60.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 16 9 2 7 7 PER CENT 100.0 56.2 12.6 43.7 43.7 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 11 6 2 5 4 PER CENT 100.0 54.5 18.2 45.4 36.4 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 5 3 0 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 ATTACHMENT "Be' JONES STREET PAGE 9 Of 10 CENTRAL TO 20th 1TNIT 8 PROJECT 1O4-240OO-149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 9,307.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 930.75 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 10,238.25 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ -0- -0 n COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 1,152.0 100.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE.......................................... 1,152.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ -0- ®0- COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 82202.24 80.1 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$8,202.24 80.1 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 586.84 5. 7 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 7,615.40 74.4 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i 2,622.85 25.6 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,152.0 677.0 703.0 0 449.0 PER CENT 100.0 58.8 61.0 0.0 39.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 25 16 16 0 9 PER CENT 100.0 64.0 64.0 0.0 36.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 20 15 12 0 8 PER CENT 100.0 75.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 13 11 10 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 84.6 76.9 0.0 23.1 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 7 4 2 0 5 PER CENT 100.0 57.1 28.6 0 .0 71.4 ATTACHMENT "B" ROUSE STREET PAGE 10 of 10 BLANDEN TO EMMA UNIT 9 PROTECT 104-24000-149 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE.................................................................................................._........$ 4,736. 70 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 473.67 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................5 5,210.37 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 450.0 90.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE_.......................... 50.0 10.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE...., _ - ...... ..... 500.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 3,087.00 59.2 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT................................................... 343.00 6.6 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..,...... ............ -......... .... ................ - -.. - $ 3,430.00 65.8 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 657.00 12.6 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.......... ..................................................................................................................... 2,773.00 53.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................i 2,437.37 46.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 500.0 350.0 250.0 0 250.0 PER CENT 100.0 70.0 50.0 0�0 50.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 10 7 5 0 5 PER CENT 100.0 70.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 10 7 55 0 5 PER CENT 100.0 70.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 9 6 5 0 4 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 55.6 0.0 44.4 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 1 0 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 } W J jO O O CA z •e Q H 0 W �- F U. fA IA F z rr 0 z Q C a O (D e o LL M Q z o LL J a N z o 0 0 W O Sr LL N011113d 03NOIS QRIVIZYN3 Allo p 2 N a, pO O O O O O W H W .Y a BOLL a Q Q N F W %0 Cl)z N rn °' 0n a+ co An O N ao ao ao 0; vi Ma N n n n o F U' Q Q M M 7 Q W O N .4 a L n r n rz F z W 00 00 00 00 N jr W O O O O cn LL W m m 41 m JJ m �00 9~1 �00 W ~ p 000 w 4 p M N Ln � a a N •-4 W A p 10 } J N M N M m d' q• W H • Ci. ks W ¢ 0t 0� H H CL O .o rA ca J lj O M o N N N N 3NOZ ova a rn (n cr e to W n o W Z ¢ 3 p w � p 0 d o a s o p z H 3 C; c. a U O z W 7. d 0) 0��p 0 tzu.� 2pgo ZC W a � G 0~e Iro TvtMM Q Q . � y 7 A43 4 Eziu`'i �w z U. na ma dz wz ^^^�� tip AMp Cd �iA@p+p F+ LO (n ix M O @� R7M TyM NN« wa W m O N N (1) Z .a 'I M (r Q W wo c.1 W �- H W N N O i a a O o w nc Q z Oco co co It k w � J W O ui W NO II 63NDI dS ylIM MID 3N91 c zw o 0 0 0 0 0U w Ln Ln w Q U) 10 0 c N N= w m M T M �D p O W � �+ p �0 M W > Q W O 04 N C-4 eq �a U- n n n n z Z O W O N O N n m W W W m m ai Z u �91 Z O �s O ~ C ` 00 a o w u � 0 W �o } J N M M N m p W a a O cr ~ N vi a O P+ r� � J as O M 3NOZ o� > H (n Ir a o (A W a c W Z apt o O LL[. N O �4 N 4 Q U O o 2 W 8 ` N a exQ cr PC Aj i-a-� o W a o c � w w� Z a -4 m� m.4 mx .d F- Q as Zvi � L< L. a Z O � con ►�7cn i < wa W ul O O O O N z( H H � of O r a en Cr o U cu r- LL N c z � z a c a O CD o cL cc a z 0 w � J n4 N z cn M W 0 U. N011113d aRIVIIINI AXIO 03NDIS z W N O O O O O N0: F- O a(nQW LA � a v w cn M z N N M N V1 V1 V1 tit N O O W N N N N O :E N m G% f 0a C1 N z a LL r n L z z W m roi M Ln 5 y� U.IL z z 0 O t T _ ac a �- U Le) fA kO W �o O J N N N N � � m W9 W p W CL 4 O z t` a O o �� r � J O PS y 3NOZ N N N N K•. RI P4 pi O o: O .7 N z ¢F 'o N W CL o W z Ir O m 3cp O w C4En Q u m x a ® O z d U O z W N p a i-F- o a as a�i sd rpi -°°i W Q Z G W N C m qu g F- g z li Gd w p N pd N a a' 0 C) t0j t�1 r0 a ¢ U. a W > cr CIA %D cn (AZ 0 . cn ® N .-a Q Ix W o v W F- LL N 4 0 a 0 O Z O W a 47 f. J 0.. O a enN 0 W U. a N011113d Q31VIZINI AZID 03NDIS 0 f W N O O O O O rn O CAW ~ .oi .ot .07 rOi C; GLM :E N U. W �n Ull u1 7 0 aQa � N c s N Z N `G .O 10 `° d d1:) N L Ln ui C4o tW rn rn m m n c�a a M F 5 N W 2 Q W O Ni a a LL n r n n r o Zf" o 0 0 0 0 0 W M P9 M M N U. U. Z Z O D _ o n L F O a c � a tn 0 %0 to -4 W �O fl Y 10 M 10 M N N N N � m ca C. W a a o a a O r4 rl c � J O M N N N N 3NOZ o � rn OF 'o co m tN W m U cr TI TI 0 G O c 7 14 a W 3 m C UO � Z 94 O CO to FF a V� m �O W s N d m m miv Z Z Z 84 C a mm > um, O x u� .C) �+ c� 45 a e as a, ►� o 4(n Z 0 cd) 1 00 rn � Go 0 > M } W > CA Z$ .4 .4 N c�1 G Q' H a W OV W f- 1L to v1 cn f- Z u1 u1 O a. 0 0 Ln o U. a a Z O 4 t ~ J o N rr W O m W iV(1 d 03NOI Q3yVIyINI ]CZI� 3N'JIS c W O o00 O O O'N W O Ix; O O �Y N I7 p� Q LL w in in In to r4 w co N O C U1 U) N O O O S O fn m U) O O O O O Z X a (n co co coo 00 n U' a Q 1 ~ W k Q W O � -4 � .4 ¢ a k n n n H� 2 W u1 u1 u1 u1 O W � Ln W W Z Z O } O F p a � a Ln U) ko W 1 X t Un t In } J N N N N m o W a a O � J a+ O cn R1 3N�Z N N N N Z PO !q 00 PO O W Ca d — 0 '4 to Z F Op fn W o O W Z O �O N o O a 4 a Z W ((--� Z Z Z W d Dc -4 N coC 0 sw 61 d C dl > ti 14 C W b Q U m ¢7 w Z IL ,,C.1 A E�9 G4 A 6 W � O D 4 g O H O -4 -4 � U) Itig .4 r. � yo ad -4 a w n. 04 Cc, c0 (n a0 cn 0 cn } w O .fit to z t r a w VUJ li U) CL N 0 C cr a w } J Q N � w O N0IJ I13d m to 0 03NSIS G o 0 0 w0 00 o ao N ID Cr O w C ^tea a 00 QM ILL- m V! CA u. a a v CV 0 r w Nz N ado a®o a®0 N N O to o o ID �Q r. o N rn rn s a, rn F U' Q Q cn Z-� Q w O z a. w rr z Ow or w a, -4 Ln WW z z o � o a c m a 0 CA w o x co co F m a w a a O cr r N n' O J o� u 3NOZ o ,e > o� N � ¢ CO w CL' n a w z cr Ya C Ll� a o o ® ro a ra «aa k O wcr a � a a a: g ,� F F o w d .3 04 z z z a a U a .� d ut t30 .: Cn U cn w z li ¢ w ti O ra w ee bo Cl w o r ® in a °, � }rn rn m r�a wawa � � 1 14 cmcn } W N 2in O O O O v1 Vl u1 U1 `n O ~ � H Q W O U W 0 W _z O z Q O a Ln Ln to o c� Le) o w oc a z O w ¢ J C1 N O W Ln w W N011113d (13NOIS w z 0) zo 6 z° >+- 03NJI 0 ZNmH a o 0 0 0 0 0ch 0 0 O� W w O O O O O � cG 1O cD N LL W at N N N N cn M cn C"7 en aQa w 0 0 H W O O O O O O O b O n N z (0) O o o O o O o O O NMN W LD VO LD LO cO 10 10 cD LO O V1 H Q Q W m 0 .�-� � Nr .Nr .N04 i aw n n n n n n n n n r� z 0 W LL W N W W Ln Ln Ln u01 Ln Ln Ln 'r z z O H � a o �0 � a � L N D W '0 O 0 Y CID cc r� a w ¢ o w a in 1+ n cn rn o0 7 ,� 3NOZ N N N V U U V U oa v> cr W ¢ N W O W z r wo o o m ti m ti En - a Z ks - go aLU w d i z z z ale � � CO N 3"4 wL w N �u c ww�y Q -am y p ,a co f7 ao .7 co o ao Wz CL d u w N 0 R Ri w 4i a 1+ a+N N '�N g H Q Q Pfe chi P+G H-4 .,-4i .p x S cn -U (, l (1) Z L ,3 Q N f/] ti7 D z Z z at Z ¢ LLI LO 0 (A 51 O rl O 9c co O cE r4 O N 41 N .0�D 4J N �(A a m 0 OO 3N U O 00 60 410 QQw0. cca eCn 0m TIN rl C7 Hcn tQN ON C2N um UN UN wcll .T.N .T.N f.7N 04 W > w 0: w cr 1.- 41 W WO V W LL U) z )o 0 z 4 0 C) IL tn 0 o U- 0: z 0 LL :D cr cn w 0LL cr NO 11113 d a3NOIS a w UN ) 0 C) C) C: 0 C! ! C! W C) 0 .o 0 0 a, w�- w 0 revr, 4 r, r- � Lf) -a 10 Mtn U. cr tn r4 ram. c-4 N M rn co N O 0 C> CD W 0 0 Z cn (n=) (n N C; 00 W r, LA -4 Ln tn Ln in cq cn In M r M M M en OQ Cr M U) F. W cr I.— N N C-4 eq N r4 c14 (N W 0 -4 0 LL 0 W O O O O O O C) w w n O N v) Lm rn Ln LL LL � z z N M cq clj M 04 In M M M M cn en cn ca Ix 0 a: F 0 IL 0 1-4 a, rry 00 cli c%j G U CA 3NOZ 0 M, ,4 U) cr 4) w Z > IV cr (n-1 "t a Pw �j 14 'a z 'c " P �4 4a., 0 It oo 4J > 1-4 N r-4 tr c, oo co U N -�4 4j 0 QD 44o ca 4 �, N N C) ow a $4 W .0 cli -4 F. co v) -4 to 4j L� zo w a- Z, 3r >, 41 LU ", a (L 0� be 4i F- 4 1 — w '1-4 . V -14 0 -,4 0 ca v) 4� z Z 14 s.W to cu z U- i, a) uj 0 w oo ij w cq N 4j 0 1. co in ce cc N 0 C-4 >N 0 0 eq en ca Ln aawa <.4 eq z P. P4 c%j pw m N W 41.1/ 0 z; o Q W V W WU. H O ~O h-- z a c C o LL a: Q z O LL J a cr. 0N eOn vOi N Ln w O m LL NOIIII d 63NDIS ll� � z° z z z° >' z 0 zw EN" 00 N O N v� O O Q ON w o co M Ll 14 o Ln ctnn Ln sal �.N LL w N N M M to M M M Q Q Q V O C co �n x N co 10 Q N a O O O (n Q 0 m � O M .o 00 W 00 M Ln o Ln vt Ln w a N N M cn M M M M M Q Q H Z. w cc N N N N N N N Qw O 1-4 -4 -4 M a U- f x crwrn w IT Ln .fit Ln Ln o Lr) LL LL U4 a O r3 a x a rr .a z 0 m p to $+ €+ z C 3 = = 3 3 0 O F a o w bO®a, a, ¢ Q W D 0 %D ul +0 •!' J �1 Ln N Ln to Ln %n Ln Ln m p W a a o �N c r H 44 t0 W O Ln N d O W W O H O ri H N M J O k- pp 3NOZ 0 O U coat o� H O T N Ix 4 t!) w CL W z O: T 0 U., v G O 0 o 0 _ a o z ss�qq 0 14 m m o 0 t� O z w 0 0 4 m •+ � W _ -f w x Q cr k4 as 41 w cc co d a�i ep w Q a $4 a . (am w w N of a a a G O N 4 0 N -A 6) O .1 O O O ,}. ti N P EH di $4 EH �D �? N h N " W W DO Z � Q � � 'O W V is Cl 01 UviHwyy z LL z 0z ? m. ? �z vz cz cz d W O O & $4 °H0 ZOO q0 �G+ .00 00m co I,-. 4 4 in s ix :4.#, td '' ey w fd w.0 41 4)t QW.t O It <a LL 4 -4 PqN 12 CDN q PO 0 -4 q 4 q -4 } w > Ix po N Z(n 00 m r d cl I } Q Q w c� o LL u~i N h- _ a o � 0 4. ¢ Q z O 4 tW7 ~ a J 00 .Ft vOi Ln N w O m w N011I13d �' a m m 0 m 03NDIS y z° r �+ c F N 0® a00 00 m O O a00 O Z w 0cr f N w — cn 10 7 7 %0 cn .t cn p w~ w N N N f+1 In fn co 04 '-1 rn N U. QaQv O C go N Z U) vwl coo co0OD O cn O coo O LA:a N G ai �7 �7 D vi IO co co Ln In Ln co I N N N N N cn u't M N .4 tn C9 Q Q F+ Q w O � � -4 � ir a r r r r r r r 1z Z} Zw co pp Go 0pLn U. U. 44 p Oa 0 fn O 75 .O,C .0 • .� .O ,C Z cA la la M U l+ N Sa Z m = - 3 3 0 3 m � p u m ai rot ai a c Ow w w 1 w Oa4 uQ o$ p N Uz z zH c9x w p Y e9 z z v F m w Lnn Ln Ln to tn LM Ln LM LM d: n a -a m r Ma d o W U1 '4 -4 N O N -4 O O J _ 14 � o �n y 3 NO Z ,6 ,a ,a O eO•a > H� N w a o V1 w 4 O w Z 6 a O Ouw 00 o Q dQ to 0) e� e0 tez 00 0� m �0 cZ wQ 4 u m Oi C m c W C W 0 a. 0 4 4) ci N tiamO Z w O O O C mzz � N PG" N ILLJ ^ O 41 Ui 5 mU rL) Q O'p� 2 -4Z .-O4Z 411 pz Az $m4Z .. ..�' � N 8 a z O a7 Ym4+ 4 pp-1 0 -4 m 0 w cn u1 N(D oa v1 3 �.7r 7�G N pC .4 ria > crCc w ��(%✓L O Z cn O Q 0 H � N a z 4 o LL w Q z O Q J W U Cl) Ln tn N011113d 03NDIS � z z z W cnN O m O O O O y � F_ O W W O n tn 000 Ln Ln in r4 r4 O+ '�N W W r4 cn N cn cn en r� +0 O e70 N z ui N N O O O O O O N .iQ 00 fA N cn N cn cn en r` N .c F-1 a a' O N N N N N N N Q W rl r-1 .-/ '-1 14 r-1 r-1 d'a U. n r 1z Iz t` n O W V O N O O O O Ln cr W cn en Ln In cn O 14 LL LL w w O O Z S9 oa 41 1� W 4 i+ O O O O O Go nitC a2 3 t g r. .4 ai ti a O be w Dom, w a Nc°ti z z W a O Y z z t9 y +D } J 1n v+ %D to 10 V+ +0 m uY cn c/1 Ln Ln to u1 w a: W a a It N cn O ,o oC r w w w a O O O 0 z N Pri Cf9 Vi y Z 44 � O 3NOZ a. e > �� N 8 u. z ,4 O 3c ,b O O O N � Q f w W O U O 2 W ai ao O�0 W W FA .4 u -4 q4 cc -4 N N a 41 y ((..--.. Q N O C C Q w p C 0 0 W 0. N Z z Z W 54 CL iO3 ti % O ti c O}�� O R 11 W S u Q� � z r�i PC to P. ^W 2 IL [UNggg ll] 84�UUJ) Y .i 10 N WpO ON �O Frill [- (n aUG O O� A � d a t7lN a� Hd 4 4 Y. 0. W O m N Z Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln O cn .4 f' 4 W O U W F- H W N to I z P: a z a O 0 o LL 0= Q z O LU ¢ J t=A 0 Ln Lf) Ln Ln W cr N011113d co co M go 03NJIS z° z° z° as ; c W O O O O O O O O O zyM F- C W W O O O O O O O c O QN� aW, N N N N N N N cn N O C o% Nz 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Uf cn en en e^ eh en 14 C4 en p W M M cn M M M M en M F„ t7 Q Q ~ WD: !- ID QW O 000 e�0 000 goo 000 m 000 ()0 m cr a g zc z z z Io ZF z 0 W C1 O O O O O O O O M W v in cn U9 to on Ln Ln Ln W W Oi m z p z O a Q L C L ~ 0 W a o to U Q z to N `a W 0 H W a a O cr p d J PE +' CV N N N N N a N 3 N O Z e� ca oa ao ao ao as e N W U K1 O P+ Nf cr N ¢ ~ ° of W p W z � C O w � C Q c a c w may' w o i o Q d 'o da N - d Q! W O N co GI "� y 14 U '�+ N m LLJ z a ►, es Sm a'�ioa `' � c~i7 a a coo uo . 0 0 00 . 0 zug9 � i Z wa >+a a 4 ++ a -a ma $. w Na ¢ W gg O go '.e.o .-e N ?.a, °O en bo O C 4 x.t -,A cn cn O Y ID C v1 W Ln C en ' A Ln -4 `¢ w O. 64 N C.IN C!N .�.N Fig $f, 0r, Wr/ cd 1, ,y.N ON 09N :]t 4 ,tsN } W � w O U) On V1 Zn ON M 0 � Q W WO V W H F W N cn Z 0 Z -ao a o G o LL at a z O w � a J CL M 0 o u0i W LL N d' N011[Ad 03NDIS c to Z N o O O ca W W 0 O n a 0 U W N r O O NZ N o O e+ N O W O e0'1 O s•1 7 z MM M Q Q C 5 LU Q W 0 0�00 �aLL z� o z a O W O O m W a4t O LL W kn z z 0 PO4 0 a 0 U Q � � W o � Y )- m en H n. W a a o at d 0 c0 J e� 3NOZ CQ as d 0 N W 0. ® W z � 3 c o 4 Q o z W z i x o Q Q fl 0' W a � 4) w 14 z CL Q 6 c xU) Q a UNg uu z W 4) u, p c� -M L, d w .+�c <twa �� s City of Fort Worth, Texas V Mayor and Council Communication M°Rpm G"AAM DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving on the North PAGE KW NUMBER Side, Project 4-149 6/20/66 C-728;(Revised Iof —2 Council action on the project described below is requested: Project Description Nature of work: Assessment Paving at 9 Locations North Side, as follows : 'ROADWAY UNIT STREET LIMITS WIDTH R.O.W. 1) N.E. 30th Street Weber Street to Lulu Street 30 feet 60 feet 2) N.E. 30th Street Lulu Street to Schwartz Avenue 30 feet 60 feet 3) N.E. 30th Street Hale Avenue to Runnels Avenue 30 feet 60 feet 4) N.E. 30th Street Runnels Avenue to Grover Avenue 30 feet 60 feet 5) N.E. 30th Street Grover Avenue to Deen Road 30 feet 60 feet 6) N.E. 29th Street Schwartz Avenue to Oscar Avenue 30 feet 60 feet 7) Salisbury Avenue Hale Street to Grover Avenue 30 feet 50 feet 8) Jones Street Central Avenue to 20th Street 30 feet 71 feet 9) Rouse Street Blandin Avenue to Emma Avenue 30 feet 50 feet Petitions have been received for the paving of Units 6, 7, 8, and 9. Units 1 through 5 were initiated by the City to provide for continuous paving and bet- ter flow of traffic in the area. The post card survey, however, indicated that property owners in Units 1 through 4 are in favor of the paving. A storm drain necessary to serve Unit 7 "Salisbury Avenue" is included in the contract award. The drainage facility will cost $5,553, .and necessary right- of-way will cost $362.13 for eight parcels also recommended for purchase in M&C's L-1227 through L-1233. Submission of Bids The following bids were received for the paving project: BIDDER AMOUNT BID WORKING DAYS Texas Bitulithic Company $57,099.70 62 R. W. Gibbins, Inc. 58,640.75 62 General Construction Company 59,138.25 62 Glade Construction Company 61,488.50 62 S.R.Q. Asphalt, Inc. , Arlington 63,809.05 62 Worths' Construction Company 63,904.75 62 Project Cost and Financing Based on the low bid, approximately $29,392.00 will be assessed against abutting property owners. The cost to the City-at-large will be approxi- mately $33,417.67 including engineering, storm drainage and miscellaneous expenses. OFFICIAL RECORD CITY ,.-...,.. ; ,RY FT. DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Assessment Paving on the North PAGE NUMBER UMBER devised Side, Project 4-149 ? r � 6/20/66 0p ) i o _ Recommendations 1) That the following Bond Fund Transfers be approved: AMOUNT FROM TO FOR $29,392.00 Revolving Fund 042-10424-149, 9 Locations Property owners' North Side portion of con- struction cost. $33,417.67 104-24000-901 104-24000-149, 9 Locations City's portion of Unspecified North Side construction, en- Projects gineering and mis- cellaneous costs. 2) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Declaring the necessity for and ordering the improvements; b) Making provisions for levying of assessments ; c) Directing the Public Works Department to prepare estimates of cost and amounts to be assessed; d) Awarding the contract to Texas Bitulithic Company on its low bid of $57,099.70; and e) Making appropriations to cover the indebtedness thereby incurred for improvements of the project named above. 3) That an ordinance be adopted: a) Approving the estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; and b) Setting July 5, 1966, as the date of the Benefit Hearing. JLB:lp The following summaries are attached: Attachment "A" - Resume of the project and summary of the Neighborhood Hearing. Attachment "B" - Distribution of cost and results of Post Card Survey. Attachment "C" - Assessment Rolls in alphabetical aT �. Fro - i IF -_44 SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSITIO BY COUNCIL: PR9.CESSED BY APPROVED 9KOTHEIt (DESCRIBE) �^ -CITYSECRETARY DATE /JyC1 0 ITV MANAGERj966