HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 7968 ORDINANCE NO. Gt�
AN ORDINANCE DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS; PROVIDING FOR THE
EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF FORT
WORTH, TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF 9.21 ACRES (0.014
SQUARE MILES) OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, WHICH SAID TERRITORY
LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT BOUNDARY LIMITS
OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; PROVIDING THAT THE TERRITORY ANNEXED
SHALL BEAR ITS PRO RATA PART OF TAXES; PROVIDING THAT THE
INHABITANTS THEREOF SHALL HAVE ALL THE PRIVILEGES OF ALL
THE CITIZENS OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL AMEND EVERY PRIOR ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT
HEREWITH; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL PRIOR ORDINANCES NOT IN DIRECT CONFLICT;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND NAMING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council of the City
of Fort Worth, Texas, wherein all interested persons were provided
with an opportunity to be heard on the proposed annexation of the
territory hereinafter described, was held at the City Council
Chambers in the Municipal Office Building of Fort Worth, Texas, on
the 21st day of August, 1979, which date is not more than twenty
(20) nor less than ten (10) days prior to the institution of
annexation proceedings; and
WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was published prior
thereto in a newspaper having general circulation in the City of
Fort Worth, Texas, and in the hereinafter described territory on
the loth day of August, 1979, which date was not more than twenty
(20) nor less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the population of the City of Fort Worth, Texas was
in excess of 367,000 inhabitants on January 1, 1963 and in excess
of 400,000 inhabitants on January 1, 1979; and
WHEREAS, the corporate area of the City of Fort Worth, Texas
was 152.580 square miles on January 1, 1963 and was 243.779 square
miles on January 1, 1979; and
a
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described territory lies within the
exclusive extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Fort Worth,
Texas; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described territory lies adjacent to
and adjoins the City of Fort Worth, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described territory contains 9.21
acres (0.014 square miles) of land, more or less;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That the following described land and territory lying adjacent
to and adjoining the City of Fort Worth, Texas, is hereby added to
and annexed to the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and said territory
hereinafter described shall hereafter be included within the
boundary limits of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the present
boundary limits of said City, at the various points contiguous to
the area hereinafter described, are altered and amended so as to
include said area within the corporate limits of the City of Fort
Worth, Texas, to-wit:
Being 9.21 acres, located in Tarrant County, Texas, comprising
land at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of County
Roads 1054 and 1035 in the Isabel Flores Survey, Abstract No.
507 situated about 10 miles southwesterly from the Tarrant
County Courthouse and embracing a portion of the 204.5 acre
tract, described in the deed to A. Keller Doss, recorded in
Volume 2017, Page 212 of the Tarrant County Deed Records, and
being more particularly described by metes and bounds as
follows:
BEGINNING at a point for corner in the present Fort Worth City
Limit line, which point for corner is the intersection of two
lines which have a bearing of South No Degrees - 45 Minutes
West 500.11 feet from the center of County Road 1054 and South
89 Degrees - 34 Minutes - 15 Seconds East, 501.5 feet from the
East right-of-way line of County Road 1035;
2
THENCE South No Degrees - 45 Minutes West, 799.89 feet to a
7/8" iron rod for a reentrant corner of the tract described in
the deed to Transconti Investment Corporation recorded in
Volume 6184, Page 735 of said Deed Records;
THENCE North 89 Degrees - 34 Minutes - 30 Seconds West to the
West right-of-way line of County Road No. 1035;
THENCE North along with the West right-of-way line of County
Road No. 1035 to a point for corner in the present Fort Worth
City Limit line which point for corner is 500 feet South of
and parallel to the center line of County Road 1054;
THENCE South 89 Degrees - 34 Minutes - 15 Seconds East to the
Point of Beginning and containing 9.21 acres of land.
SECTION 2.
That the above described territory is shown on Exhibit Map A
which is attached hereto and expressly incorporated herein by
reference for the purpose of illustrating and depicting the
locations of the hereinabove described territory.
SECTION 3.
That the above described territory and the area annexed shall
be part of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the property so
added hereby shall bear its pro rata part of the taxes levied by
the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and the inhabitants thereof shall
be entitled to all of the rights and privileges of all the
citizens and shall be bound by the acts, ordinances, resolutions
and regulations of the City of Fort Worth, Texas.
SECTION 4.
That thereafter the City Limit Line of Fort Worth shall be:
A part of the Isabel Flores Survey, Abstract No. 507, Tarrant
County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point for corner in the present Fort Worth City
Limit line, which point for corner is the intersection of two
lines which have a bearing of South No Degrees -45 Minutes
West 500.11 feet from the center of County Road 1054 and South
89 Degrees - 34 Minutes - 15 Seconds East, 501.5 feet from the
East right-of-way line of County Road 1035;
3
THENCE South No Degrees - 45 Minutes West, 799.89 feet to a
7/8" iron rod for a reentrant corner of the tract described in
the deed to Transconti Investment Corporation recorded in
Volume 6184, page 735 of said Deed Records;
THENCE North 89 Degrees - 34 Minutes - 30 Seconds West to the
West right-of-way line of County Road No. 1035;
THFNCF North along with the West right-of-way line of County
Road No. 1035 to a point for corner in the present Fort Worth
City Limit line which point for corner is 500 feet South of
and parallel to the center line of County Road 1054;
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall and does amend every prior ordinance
in conflict herewith, but as to all other ordinances or sections
of ordinances not in direct conflict, this ordinance shall be, and
the same is hereby made cumulative.
SECTION 6.
That it is hereby declared to be the intent of the City Coun-
cil that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases
of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sen-
tence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect
any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and
sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted
by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of
any unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section.
4
SECTION 7.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after the date of its passage on second reading as provided for in
Section 40 of Chapter XXVIII of the Charter of the City of Fort
Worth and it is so ordained.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
c----ray
Arthur R. Peter en, City Attorney
ADOPTED: 9c,Z-L,,,. 9 , / / * g
EFFECTIVE:
5
r
`r ► .. ��^ 0LEA AiisA tIVD, p
I ONA
O E K
•
WIN ANKER AY EpC��O !� IiO1A O
wi
........ ...
{
0O�
�� � lJNi1r jliMlr�%jYM::N%ji1►•/J��M fIMM •IMM:!.A•rr r•r 4r�'+i✓ �{, .IMM.wow r+.r..Nr yww.ww w....r...�..n...1.Mr: ....R.ww.iMM. �+��•�.�.war+M+
.....:•i::::::ii j::::
E
::......... v:.::• '
5�
FORT:...:..: R1oG�
a.
ROA
O
i
0
-44
PR I
af
t
�E PpO E5
noel tivas �o.
1ii•
LIMIT FORT WORTH
SUBJECT
0 R
I
. Pfi Y s L
COUNTY I
i
I
I COUNTY
. I .
I
JUNE 1979 PREPARED BY
SCALE: 1" = 2000" EXHIBIT MAP "A" DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT -dgdk*-
CORPORATE BOUNDARY CHANGE — CITY OF FORT WORTH
PROJECT: ANNEXATION-I. FLOR.ES SURVEY FILE NO. Q-79-5
A R E A O F F 0 R T W 0 R T H PUBLIC HEARING DATE
PREVIOUS TOTAL. CITY LIMIT AREA SQ. "I - ORD. NO.
ANNEX
TOTAL THIS ORDINANCE DEA"JFJEX SQ. mi. 1ST READING DATE
NEU TOTAL CITY LI141T AREA SQ. HI. FINAL READING DATE
CITY COUNCIL ANNEXATION TIME TABLE
MEETING DAYS CALENDAR DATES ACTION
FIRST WEEK August 7, 1979 Councib appnoves u 9C sett ng
public heating in thiAd week' to
cone idea cu►,tempiated annexation
and oAde.ts pu bi.ication I o D No.t -,l e o 6
Pubfic Hea,,,.ng oee time on one o6 ,the
6o tow.ing th.r ee days,
SECOND WEEK August 14, 1979 No Action
THIRD WEEK August 21, 1979 Council hotgs its public. heating pt,io-
• to :nsti,tu,ting annexation p4oeeedcng6 .
FOURTH WEEK August 28, 1979 Nu act Un
FIFTH WEEK September 4, 1979 Cowie.£ .i►zti tu-te.s annexation p4oceed-
ings by adopteen o6 annexation otdi-
nance on 6.itst tead.cng. Ondeu pub&-
cation o6 otdinanee one .Lime oj,, one o6
the 6oiioctt6,g t{uce.e days.
SIXTH WEEK September 11, 1979 No Action
SEVENTH WEEK September 18, 1979 OPTIONAL ACTION: 16 Council wishes to
hold a public heating on ,the teconmended
in.i,tiai zoning etas i6 'cation at .the
.time o6 6inat annexation, a Resolution
Ae,ttinq the zoning hea.t.ing bi the tenth
week wiU be adopted on thins date.
EIGHTH WEEK September 25, 1979 No Action
NINTH WEEK October 2, 1979 No Action
TENTH WEEK October 9, 1979 Councit adopts annexa.tcon otdinance or,
second and 6i.nae te.ading .
OPTIONAL ACTION: Ib zon.cng hevLing haz
been advettised, Councit hoids pub&c
hevuing to es-tabZi.sh zoning o6 the an-
nexed area.
1
A,-.i pub.l.ica-Lion.e to be in the o66teia.£ necoepapv 06 the City L'; Fott (a'o2.th.
Dates Entered by: .�-• n,'�' '✓X i
Ike Thompson
July , 1977 A-05-69
REPORT ON
ANNEXATION: I. FLORES SURVEY
Request
A. Keller Doss, owner of 9.21 acres at the southeast quadrant of the intersec-
tion of County Roads 1054 and 1035, is requesting that this property be annexed
into the City of Fort Worth. The property is located in Fort Worth's exclusive
extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and is contiguous with Fort Worth' s cor-
porate limits (see attached Exhibit Map "A").
Jurisdication
There are no ordinance conflicts existing and no common boundary adjustments
with other cities required for annexation. Also, we have not met our maximum
allowable annual ten (10%) percent of our corporate area eligible to annex in
this 1979 calendar year.
Sector and District Plan
The District H General Plan envisions low density residential use for the
property in question.
A request to establish zoning on the subject site has been submitted to the
City. The requested zoning is from Unzoned to "E" Commercial (Case: Z-79-86).
Although a plan for development has not been submitted, it is anticipated that
the proposed development will be a shopping facility. The current use of the
subject property is a farm house.
Planning
If the rezoning request is granted to allow commercial development, the Planning
Department does not foresee any future negative impacts.
Not only will this development affect the subject site but the property immed-
iately surrounding it as well. The Planning Department suggests that medium
density residential use be proposed to surround the site to the east, south, and
west and that no further commercial encroachment be allowed south along County
Road 1035. To the north of County Road 1054 exists large areas of land, platted
and developed single family housing. The general trend should continue to be
predominantly single family housing when development occurs south of County
Road 1054.
This parcel of land is close enough to City of Fort Worth' s existing development
that it would not create any obstacles for furnishing City services to the area.
Water
Water service could be readily extended to the property from an existing 16-inch
main in West Cleburne Road (Co. Rd. 1035) at Columbus (Co. Rd. 1054). This
500-foot extension as a 16-inch main would cost an estimated $12,500 and would
be a developer cost as an approach main to the subject property.
Existing sewer service is quite remote from this property, since it drains east
toward the proposed Meadow Creek Addition. Even after the first development unit
of Meadow Creek Addition is in place, sewer would still be approximately a mile
east of the subject property. If this extension of sewer service to the subject
property were constructed subsequent to initial development in Meadow Creek
Addition, it would be a 100 percent developer cost as an approach sewer, and it
would cost an estimated $150,000. The developer would be entitled to a credit of
ten percent of calculated front foot charges for his property served by this
off-site sewer extension as a City contribution to off-site costs, as his
property is platted and connected to the sewer.
Transportation
If the area is developed as a shopping center, approximately 15 arterial street
lights would be required at a cost of approximately $20,000. The City' s share
would be $10,000. The cost of installing street name signs and stop signs in the
area is estimated to cost $2,000, bringing the City' s initial installation cost
to $12,000. In addition, the estimated annual power and maintenance cost to
operate 15 arterial street lights would be $1,100 per year.
The Department of Transportation has no objection to this annexation and feels
they would have no problem in providing services.
Tax
The proposed annexation of 9.21 acres is estimated to produce tax revenue of
$207.50. This assumption is based upon the present tax rate of $1 .639 per
hundred.
Health
Engineering - services required by this department would be inspection of
business establishments (food, drink, amusement places, etc.) and private
premise inspection for environmental complaints. Water and sewer facilities
would have to be provided for all business establishments prior to occupancy.
Nursing - if citizens request services, the neighborhood clinic in the Como area
would be closest to this location and would be recommended to citizens for
health care along with the WIC program. Home visits would be made to this area
as needed.
Library
The Library Department no longer provides bookmobile service in or near shopping
centers within the City limits. The anticipated development of the 9.21 acres
into a shopping facility would, under the present service patterns of the
Library, effect no change, particularly since the Library has tried unsuc-
cessfully, so far, to add branch facilities in this sector to provide service
adequate for citizens who use libraries more heavily than elsewhere in the City.
Public Works
Sanitation - this annexation will not require additional resources in the
Sanitation Division. Sanitation services are currently delivered in the area
just north of this property and will be available as requested.
Street - the only roadway within or adjacent to this property is County Road
No. 1035, adjacent to the west side of the subject site. This road is a rural
penetration street on a flexible gravel base with no stabilization. The roadway
is 22 feet wide and has been recently seal coated. It appears that this roadway
will require no maintenance during the next year. The condition of the road is
rated good.
Economic Development Coordinator
Annexation of the subject property and development for use of the shopping
facility will provide employment and income generating activities for Fort Worth
citizens and serve the commercial shopping needs of adjacent residential areas.
Sales taxes generated from the shopping center would accrue to the City.
This Office favors the annexation of this property for the use cited above based
on the foregoing reasons.
Law
The Department of Law sees no inherent legal problems involved in annexing the
subject property which would be peculiar to this annexation as opposed to any
other.
Fire
Proposed station No. 29 (6400 Westcreek) would have to be in operation to
provide a reasonable response distance (2.5 miles). The current station No. 26
(6124 South Hulen) is 2.75 miles from this area but is scheduled to be relocated
northwest of this site. Stations No. 21, 17, and 28 are 5.5, 6.35, and 5.5 miles
respectively, which would require an additional or relocated ladder company to
provide protection without an unreasonable response distance.
Police
Although the annexation in its present land use would not create a service
problem, the commercial development of this property would impact on police
service now being provided to the area in question as well as the surrounding
area already served (CandleRidge Addition). The adjoining police beats C23 and
C24 are randomly staffed depending on which shift has the greatest workload. As
a result, coverage of these two beats is provided by officers in adjoining
areas. This can only result in increased response times due to an increase in
workload and manpower shortages. By commercializing this tract, we believe it
would result in increases in police activity such as thefts, burglary of
vehicles, and vandalism.
To properly deploy resources as the subject area is developed, and properly
staff the CandleRidge Addition which is understaffed as a result of prior
annexations and development would require an addition of six officers to the
adjoining beats. The increase would be in the form of staffing by one (1)
Training Officer/Investigator and five (5) Police Officers. This would insure
that the beats which are adjacent to the area in question are fully staffed with
enough officers to answer the anticipated calls for service in the proposed
annexation.
The cost of the increase in personnel to cover adjoining beats and the annexa-
tion at ultimate development is as follows:
$ 71 ,112 Annual Salaries
5,772* Training Costs
2,100* Uniform Costs
25,630* Equipment
22,320 Auto Operation
$126,934 Total First Year Cost
(Ultimate Development)
*Non-recurring Costs
Park and Recreation
Due to the proposed commercial usage of this property, it is anticipated that
there will be no need for Park and Recreation facilities within this tract. Some
additional costs may be expected through the maintenance of medians and
parkways.
Conclusion
Various departments reflect some cost associated with providing services,
however this additional cost is expected to be necessary with the development of
the property. Without an approved plan for the property, we cannot accurately
r
project the fiscal impact of this annexation at this stage of development .
However, with service being provided in the immediate area with expanded
development , this additional service would not appear to present problems. If
the development is commercial, as anticipated, the tax yield usually off-sets
the City' s service cost. Also, the City' s Standard Policies for the Installation
of Community Facilities, which are designed to protect the City' s fiscal
participation in development, will be of significant importance in the cost
distribution being favorable to the City of Fort Worth. In addition, this
requested annexation is consistent with the City' s annexation policy by being
ready for development. Therefore, we recommend annexation of the subject prop-
erty.
Development Review Committee
At the July 19, 1979, meeting of the Development Review Committee, the
Committee, in concurrence with the Staff Report conclusions, recommended that
the subject annexation area be annexed into the City of Fort Worth.
"S City of Fort Worth, Texas
VERCHERT �j /� ry a /1 ry /�
BAILIFF Mayor and Council Communication
SMITH eft
DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: Annexation - I. Flores Survey
PAGE h
UONES NUMBER
WLARDI 8/7/79 PZ-919 1 of
A. Keller Doss, owner of 9..21 acres at the southeast quadrant of the intersection
of County Roads 1054 and 1035 is requesting that this property be annexed into
the City of Fort Worth, The property is located in Fort Worth's extraterritorial
jurisdiction (ETJ), and in contiguous with Fort Worth's corporate limits (See
attached Exhibit Map "A" and Report) . Although, a plan for development has not
been submitted, it is anticipated that the proposed development will be a
shopping facility A request to establish zoning on the subject site and addi-
tional property to the north, owned by A. Keller Doss, from Unzoned to "E"
Commercial (Case: Z-79-86) was adopted by City Council, July 12, 1979, Ordinance
No. 7934 for the portion of property now within the City limits. The Zoning
Commission recommended approval of the "E" Commercial zoning on the subject
property now outside the City limits pending annexation.
City Plan Commission
Following the recommendation of City departments and the Development Review
Committee, the City Plan Commission at its July 25, 1979, meeting voted to recom-
mend tbflthe City Council that the area be annexed. However, the Plan Commission
stated that their recommendation does not constitute a recommendation of land
use and zoning as proposed by the applicant. The following factors were consi-
dered by the City Plan Commission: AW
1. Responding City departments and the Development Review Committee indicate
an ability to serve the area.
2. The requested annexation is consistent with the City's annexation policy
by being ready for development.
3. A 500' strip parallel to West Cleburne Road (County Road 1054) was annexed
into the City of Fort Worth in April, 1978, which included the north half
of the subject owner's property. Since West Cleburne Road at the time of
annexation was partly within the City limits, proper control and develop-
ment of the proposed street improvements required that the abutting pri-
vate property on both sides of the road be in the City limits. This
annexation resulted in placing half of the subject owner's property
within the City limits of Fort Worth and the remaining portion outside,
making consolidated development difficult.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the City
Plan Commission and initiate annexation proceedings utilizing the attached
Annexation Timetable.
VS:plg
SUBMITTED FOR THE DISPOSITI Y COUNCIL: PROCESSED BY
CITY MANAGER'S
OFFICE BY: APPROVED
ORIGINATING ❑ OTHER (DESCRIBE)
DEPARTMENT HEAD: Joe Bilardi ITY SECR
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 9
CONTACT: Ike Thompson, I-E7-
�/