HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 9109F�W 01�
The September 15 City Council agenda will contain two M&Cs to initiate the annexation and
zoning process for two enclaves in the Far North sector. The 2009-2013 annexation program,
adopted with the 2009 Comprehensive Plan, recommends these areas be considered for full-
purpose annexation in 2009. Attached is a '• '• for reference. The fiscal impact analyses
are posted on the Planning and Development Department's website.
Both enclaves are within the one-mile buffer of the Texas Motor Speedway. This area is
identified in the Texas Motor Speedway Area Master Plan in order to discourage residential uses
due to noise and traffic impacts associated with the speedway. Much of the property in each
enclave has agricultural exemptions that qualify for development agreements in lieu of
annexation. These agreements, if executed, will provide the desired land use protection by
allowing full-purpose annexation if the property loses the agricultural exemption. For property not
subject to a development agreement, the City Council may apply appropriate non-residential
zoning upon annexation, in consultation with the affected property owners.
The two enclaves are described below:
• Area 2, east • 1-35W and south of SH 114, contains 61.5 acres including agricultural Ian
and the Elizabethtown Cemetery, and would be an addition to Council District 2.
Annexation of Area 2 would create a negative impact on the General Fund and would
I
require future capital improvements to improve one roadway. Staff anticipates, however,
that the primary owner will enter into a development agreement in lieu of annexation.
• Area 66-1, west of 1-35W and north of SH 114, contains 439.9 acres, including the
Speedway Distribution Center, which proposes industrial uses. This area would also be
addition to Council District 2. Annexation of this enclave is expected to have a positive
impact on the General Fund and will require no capital improvements.
Attachment
please contact Susan Alanis, Planning and Development
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS
9 TIT# 01 M
Prepared for the
City Council
By the
Planning and Development Department
September 1, 2009
I Oj
Review the following items:
✓ Annexation criteria
Fiscal impact methodology;
Areas proposed for full-purpose annexation in 2009.
N
ANNEXATION CRITERIA
A. Full - Purpose Annexation
Area must meet one or more of the following conditions.
1, Enclave
a. Enclave within City's ETJ
b. Ability to provide municipal services
2. Urban Development
a. Development activity of an urban nature
b. Ability to provide municipal services
C, Positive fiscal impact analysis
3. Growth Center
a. Designated growth center
b. Ability; to provide municipal services
C. Positive fiscal impact analysis
Adverse Impact
a. Adverse impact on City if not annexed
b. Ability to provide municipal services
5. Option to Expand
3 a. Detriment to City's_ orderly growth if not annexed
b. Ability to provide municipal services
0
i E jg
1 M
1
x
ii
. Methodology
Areas with 'Existing or Proposed Develop ent
'. Other Areas
G. Timing for Preparation of Fiscal Impact Analysis
REVENUES
General Fund
1. Property taxes to be generated by existing land uses,
based on Tarrant Appraisal District assessed values and the
City's current property tax rate.
2. Property taxes to be generated by proposed land uses,
based on anticipated assessed values and the City's current
property tax rate.
3. Other General Fund revenues includiruz: Other Local
Taxes, Licenses and Permits, Fines and Forfeitures, Use of
Money and Property, Service Charges, and Other Revenue,
based on a per capita estimate.
I
EXPENDITURES
One-time transitional costs, including street signs and
markings, and emergency response set up
I
Required capital improvements for fire service,, roadways
and drainage, and water and wastewater infrastructure
drainage,
I
3
Where are the areas proposed for full-purpose
annexation in 2009?
40
• Existing cemetery,
two gas wells, and
vacant land
• 61.5 acres
• One agricultural
exemption
• Industrial growth
center future land use
• No concept plan or
preliminary plat on
file
• No short term growth
• Property tax revenues
— $400 yearly
Lo
ANALYSIS RESULTS
• Initial Costs
— TPW - $0 start up services and $3,000 routine maintenance costs for
existinc, roadway
— Police Department - $0
— Code Compliance - $244
— Parks Department - $300
• Capital improvements necessary, to improve one roadway
• Net negative result to the General Fund
10
0
5
What future land use is designated in the 2009
Comprehensive Plan, and what is the surrounding
zoning?
.Industrial
Growth Center
What zoning is proposed for AX-09-004?
AG: Agricultural
--I CF: Community
12 Rezonin2 area consists of a total of 3 parcels.
0
0
13
♦ 9 W
• Existinf, residential.
industrial, six gas wells,
and vacant land
• 439.9 acres
• Thirteen agricultural
exemptions
* General commercial and
open space future land
uses
* Speedway Distribution
e
Cent r preliminary and
final plats on file
* Shor-erm growth
* Property tax revenues
— S183.885 vearl-v
14
• Initial Costs
— TPA' - $0 start up services and $0 routine maintenance costs for
existing roadways
— Police Department - $1.068
— Code Compliance - $244
— Parks Department - $1,000
No capital improvements necessary
Net positive result to the General Fund
What future land use is designated in the 2009
Comprehensive Plan, and what is the surrounding zoning?
G8,eral
commer'-w
Pn-at-- Open
Space
16 17
E
M
[M AG: Agricultural
1: Light Industrial
0 1
17 Rezoning area consists of a total of 29 parcels.
What is the proposed annexation and zoning
schedule for areas 2 and 66-1?
Date Action
Sept. 15 City Council adopts annexation timetable;
approves M&C to initiate zoning.
Oct. 13 Cite Council conducts first public hearing.
Oct. 20 City Council conducts second public hearing.
Nov. 11 Zoning Commission recommends zoning,
'ity Councill considers and institutes approval of
Nov. 17 ", I I
annexation.
Dec, 8 City Council considers approval of zoning.
18
•
M