Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 37390-A2 (2)AMENDMENT NO. 2 STATE OF TEXAS § CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO.�p flo1 (M&C Needed) COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth (City) and ANA Consultants, L.L.C., (Engineer) made and entered into City Secretary Contract No. 37390 (the Contract) which was executed administratively by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, the Contract involves engineering services for the following project: Upper Sierra Vista Detention Improvements Drainage Study Capital Project No. 00672; DOE NO. 5691 WHEREAS, it has become necessary to execute Amendment No. 1 to said Contract to include an increased scope of work and revised maximum fee; NOW THEREFORE, City and Engineer, acting herein by and through their duly -authorized representatives, enter into the following agreement which amends the Contract: 1. Article I of the Contract is amended to include the additional engineering services as speced in a proposal letter dated November 25th, 2010 a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. The cost to City for the additional services to be performed by Engineer total $ 132,362.00 2. Article II of the Contract is amended to provide for an increase in the maximum fee to be paid to Engineer for all work and services performed under the Contract, as amended, so that the total fee paid by the City for all work and services shall not exceed the sum of $ 19,104 + $ 13,020 (Amendment No. 1)+ $132,362 = $ 164,4864 Contract Amendment No. 2 Page 1 of 2 4 3. All other provisions of the Contract, which are not expressly amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect. Executed on this the c!LA day of 2011, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: Douglas W. Niersig, P.E. Director Transportation & Public Works Department ANA Consultants, L.L.C. ENGINEER Vice President 1331 Airport Freeway, Suite 410 Euless, Texas 76040 APPf�.f�7VEQ AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Dou�j-Mack Assistant City Attorney APPROVED: Fernando Costa Assistant City Manager ATTEST: Marty Hendrix, Hate Contract Amendment No. 2 Page 2 of 2 OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH, TX ATTACHMENT "A" Scope for Engineering Design Related Services for Storm Water Improvements Projects The scope set forth herein defines the work to be performed by the ENGINEER in completing the project. Both the CITY and ENGINEER have attempted to clearly define the work to be performed and address the needs of the Project. Under this scope, "ENGINEER" is expanded to include any sub -consultant, including surveyor, employed or contracted by the ENGINEER. OBJECTIVE A.N.A. Consultants has been asked to provide drainage design services for the Upper Sierra Vista Drainage Improvements Project City No.: 000672. This request for additional services is not part of the existing contract and was determined it will exceed the current scope. The objective of this amendment is to extend A.N.A. Consultants, L.L.C. contract to include these additional services as well as the corresponding fee adjustments. A.N.A. expects to perform the following additional services: • Approximately 5 acres of additional topographic surveying • Engineering analysis and design for 1 st phase of detention facilities proposed per the Upper Sierra Vista Drainage Study (approximately 3 acres) • Calculate Capacity of proposed detention area • Determine Additional Easement requirements • Perform Subsurface Utility Engineering Level B service within the project area WORK TO BE PERFORMED Task 1. Design Management Task 2. Conceptual Design Task 3. Preliminary Design Task 4. Final Design Task 5. Bid Phase Services Task 6. Construction Phase Services Task 7. ROW/Easement Services Task 8. Survey Services Task 9. Permitting TASK 1. DESIGN MANAGEMENT. ENGINEER will manage the work outlined in this scope to ensure efficient and effective use of ENGINEER's and CITY's time and resources. ENGINEER will manage change, communicate effectively, coordinate internally and externally as needed, and proactively address issues with the CITY's Project Manager and others as necessary to make progress on the work. 1.1. Managing the Team • Lead, manage and direct design team activities • Ensure quality control is practiced in performance of the work City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 1 of 22 • Communicate internally among team members • Task and allocate team resources 1.2. Communications and Reporting • Attend a pre -design project kickoff/chartering meeting with CITY staff to confirm and clarify scope, understand CITY objectives, and ensure economical and functional designs that meet CITY requirements. • Conduct review meetings with the CITY at the end of each design phase. • Prepare invoices, in accordance with Attachment B to this Standard Agreement and submit monthly in the format requested by the CITY. • Prepare and submit monthly progress reports in the format provided by the respective CITY Department. • Prepare and submit baseline Project Schedule initially, and Project Schedule updates with a schedule narrative monthly, as required in Attachment D to this Standard Agreement and according to the City of Fort Worth's Schedule Guidance Document. • Complete Monthly M/WBE Report Form and Final Summary Payment Report Form at the end of the project. • Coordinate with other agencies and entities as necessary for the design of the proposed infrastructure, and provide and obtain information needed to prepare the design. • With respect to coordination with permitting authorities, ENGINEER shall communicate with permitting authorities such that their regulatory requirements are appropriately reflected in the designs. ENGINEER shall work with regulatory authorities to obtain approval of the designs, and make changes necessary to meet their requirements, as part of the design scope. • Personnel and Vehicle Identification: When conducting site visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall carry readily visible information identifying the name of the company and the company representative. ASSUMPTIONS • 10 Monthly Design Reports will be submitted • 10 Monthly Schedule updates will be submitted • Two (2) members of the engineering design team will attend up to four (4) design meetings during the duration of the design process up to Bid Phase Services. DELIVERABLES A. Meeting summaries with action items B. Monthly invoices C. Monthly progress reports D. Baseline design schedule City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 2 of 14 E. Monthly schedule updates with schedule narrative describing any current or anticipated schedule changes F. Monthly M/WBE Report Form and Final Summary Payment Report Form TASK 2. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (30 PERCENT). The Conceptual Design shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project Schedule. The purpose of the conceptual design is for the ENGINEER to identify, develop, communicate through the defined deliverables, and recommend the design concept that successfully addresses the design problem, and to obtain the CITY's endorsement of this concept. ENGINEER will develop the conceptual design of the infrastructure as follows 2.1. Data Collection • In addition to data obtained from the CITY, ENGINEER will research and make efforts to obtain pertinent information to aid in coordination of the proposed improvements with any planned future improvements that may influence the project. ENGINEER will also identify and seek to obtain data for existing conditions that may impact the project including; utilities, agencies (such as TxDOT and railroads), CITY Master Plans, CITY drainage complaint files, existing applicable drainage studies, FEMA floodplain and floodway maps, existing models of project area (if any) and property ownership as available from the Tax Assessor's office. • The following is applicable at all locations that require water service line replacement: The ENGINEER shall visit the project site and obtain the meter numbers and sizes on all existing meters to be replaced on the project and shall identify existing sample stations and fire line locations. 2.2. Drainage Computations • ENGINEER will delineate the watershed based on contour data and field verification and document existing street, right-of-way and storm drain capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at maximum 1' = 200' scale from available 2400t contour data with the countours labeled. Data source and year will be provided by the CITY. Calculations regarding street and right-of- way capacities and design discharges (5-year and 100-year frequencies) at selected critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be calculated and shown. All calculations shall conform to CITY criteria delineated in the CITY's Storm Water Management Design Manual. All locations in the project area where 100-year runoff exceeds available storm drain and right-of-way capacities shall be clearly identified. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed reasonable and consistent with CITY standards. 2.3. Subsurface Utility Engineering Provide Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) to Quality Level B, as described below. The SUE shall be performed in accordance with Cl/ASCE 38-02. Quality Level D City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 3 of 14 • Conduct appropriate investigations (e.g., owner records, County/CITY records, personal interviews, visual inspections, etc.), to help identify utility owners that may have facilities within the project limits or that may be affected by the project. • Collect applicable records (e.g., utility owner base maps, "as built" or record drawings, permit records, field notes, geographic information system data, oral histories, etc.) on the existence and approximate location of existing involved utilities. • Review records for: evidence or indication of additional available records; duplicate or conflicting information; need for clarification. • Develop SUE plan sheets and transfer information on all involved utilities to appropriate design plan sheets, electronic files, and/or other documents as required. Exercise professional judgment to resolve conflicting information. For information depicted, indicate: utility type and ownership; date of depiction; quality level(s); end points of any utility data; line status (e.g., active, abandoned, out of service); line size and condition; number of jointly buried cables; and encasement. Quality Level C (includes tasks as described for Quality Level D) • Identify surface features, from project topographic data and from field observations, that are surface appurtenances of subsurface utilities. • Include survey and correlation of aerial or ground -mounted utility facilities in Quality Level C tasks. • Survey surface features of subsurface utility facilities or systems. • The survey shall also include (in addition to subsurface utility features visible at the ground surface): determination of invert elevations of any manholes and vaults; sketches showing interior dimensions and line connections of such manholes and vaults; any surface markings denoting subsurface utilities, furnished by utility owners for design purposes. • Exercise professional judgment to correlate data from different sources, and to resolve conflicting information. • Update (or prepare) plan sheets, electronic files, and/or other documents to reflect the integration of Quality Level D and Quality Level C information. • Recommend follow-up investigations (e.g., additional surveys, consultation with utility owners, etc.) as may be needed to further resolve discrepancies. • Provide Quality Level C to identify overhead utilities on the project and provide the overhead utility information on the SUE plan sheets. Level B_(includes tasks as described for Quality Level C) • Select and apply appropriate surface geophysical methods) to search for and detect subsurface utilities within the project limits, and/or to trace a particular utility line or system. • Based on an interpretation of data, mark the indications of utilities on the ground surface for subsequent survey. Utilize paint or other method acceptable for marking of lines. • Unless otherwise directed, mark centerline of single -conduit lines, and outside edges of multi -conduit systems. • Resolve differences between designated utilities and utility records and surveyed appurtenances. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 4 of 14 • Recommend additional measures to resolve differences if they still exist. Recommendations may include additional or different surface geophysical methods, exploratory excavation, or upgrade to Quality Level A data. • As an alternative to the physical marking of lines, the ENGINEER may, with CITY's approval, utilize other means of data collection, storage, retrieval, and reduction, that enables the correlation of surface geophysical data to the project's survey control. 2.4. The Conceptual Design Package shall include the following: • Written summary of alternative design concepts considered, strengths and weaknesses of each, and the rationale for selecting the recommended design concept. • Cover sheet • Drainage area map with supporting drainage computations in the CITY's standard tabular format. • SUE Plan sheets sealed by a licensed professional engineer registered in the State of Texas. • Horizontal alignment (excluding profiles) of proposed storm water improvements, including existing lot layout, , streets, street right-of-way, proposed easements, and existing utilities gathered during the SUE within the project limits. • Proposed phasing of water, sanitary sewer, street and drainage work documented in both the project schedule and narrative form. • Documentation of key design decisions (Project Decision Log). • Estimates of probable construction cost. • The Concept Phase will include an analysis of the feasibility of Phase II the future expansion of the detention pond to hold the necessary drainage for the basin. The consultant will provide a detailed detention analysis and cost estimate for Phase 2 as a part of the concept report. ASSUMPTIONS • All storm water calculations and design shall conform to the City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management Design Manual, March 2006. • The SUE and SUE plan sheets shall be in accordance with Cl/ASCE 38-02. • 8 copies of the conceptual design package will be delivered. Drawings will be half size (11" x 17"). • There will be approximately 25-30 design sheets prepared for the construction plans. • DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated project folder in Buzzsaw City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 5 of 14 • ENGINEER shall not proceed with Preliminary Design activities without written approval by the CITY of the Conceptual Design Package. DELIVERABLES A. Conceptual Design Package. TASK 3. PRELIMINARY DESIGN (60 PERCENT). Preliminary plans shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project Schedule. ENGINEER will develop the preliminary design of the infrastructure as follows 3.1. Development of Preliminary Design Drawings shall include the following: • Cover Sheet • Drainage area maps showing proposed improvements with drainage calculations and hydraulic computations in accordance with the City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management Design Manual, March 2006. • A Project Control Sheet, showing all Control Points, used or set while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400. The following information shall be indicated for each Control Point: Identified (existing City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8" Iron Rod); X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system, and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum only; descriptive location (i.e. set in the centerline of the inlet in the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and North Main Street). • Overall project easement layout sheet(s). • SUE plan drawings. • Plan and profile drawings of proposed storm water improvements, including existing lot layout with property ownership, streets, curb lines, driveways, medians (if applicable), sidewalks, existing and proposed water and sanitary sewer mains, existing utilities gathered during the SUE and existing utility easements within the project limits. • No less than two bench marks per plan/profile sheet. • The ENGINEER will prepare standard and special detail sheets that are not already included in the City's standard details. These may include connection details between various parts of the project, tunneling details, boring and jacking details, waterline relocations, details unique to the construction of the project, trenchless details, and special service lateral reconnections. 3.2. Geotechnical Investigation/Pavement Design • Soil investigations, including field and laboratory tests, borings, related engineering analysis and recommendations for determining soil conditions will be made. In addition to the above investigations, borings and appropriate field and laboratory analysis will be made at reasonable intervals along the project City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 6 of 14 alignment for the Contractor's use in determining soil conditions for preparing bids and a Trench Safety Plan. • The ENGINEER shall prepare a detailed geotechnical engineering study and pavement design in conformance with the City of Fort Worth Pavement Design Standards Manual, 2005. The study shall include recommendations regarding utility trenching and identifying existing groundwater elevation at each boring. 3.3 Constructability Review • Prior to the 60 percent review meeting with the CITY, the ENGINEER shall schedule and attend a project site visit with the CITY Project Manager and Construction personnel to walk the project. The ENGINEER shall summarize the CITY's comments from the field visit and submit this information to the CITY in writing. 3.4 Public Meeting • After the preliminary plans have been reviewed and approved by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall prepare project exhibits, and attend public meeting to help explain the proposed project to residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location and mail the invitation letters to the affected customers. The ENGINEER shall coordinate with CITY GIS staff to identify affected property owners/residents and develop a spreadsheet listing addresses of those to invite to the public meeting. 3.5 Utility Clearance • The ENGINEER will consult with the CITY's Transportation and Public Works Department, Water Department, and other CITY departments, public utilities, private utilities, and government agencies to determine the approximate location of above and underground utilities, and other facilities (current and future) that have an impact or influence on the project. ENGINEER will design CITY facilities to avoid or minimize conflicts with existing utilities, and where known and possible consider potential future utilities in designs. • The ENGINEER shall upload individual DWF files for each plan sheet of the approved preliminary plan set to the designated project folder in Buzzsaw for forwarding to all utility companies which have facilities within the limits of the project. The DWF files should be created directly from the CAD files as opposed to PDF files. ASSUMPTIONS • All storm water calculations and design shall conform to the City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management Design Manual, March 2006. • 4 borings at an average bore depth of 15 feet each will be provided. • No Traffic Control "TypiLOCI ls" will be needed. • 3 copies of the geotechnical report will be delivered to the CITY and .pdf file shall be available. • Plans will be delivered for Utility Clearance will be uploaded to Buzzsaw City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 7 of 14 • 8 half size drawings will be delivered for Constructability Review. • 8 half size drawings will be delivered for Preliminary Design. • DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated project folder in Buzzsaw. • ENGINEER shall not proceed with Final Design activities without written approval by the CITY of the Preliminary Design plans. DELIVERABLES A. Preliminary Design drawings B. Utility Clearance drawings C. Geotechnical Report D. Documentation of key design decisions (Project Decision Log) E. Estimates of probable construction cost F. Public Meeting exhibits TASK 4. FINAL DESIGN (90 PERCENT) AND FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (100 PERCENT). Upon approval of the Preliminary plans, ENGINEER will prepare construction plans as follows: • Final draft construction plans and specifications shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project Schedule. • The ENGINEER shall submit a final design estimate of probable construction cost with the final design plans submitted. This estimate shall use ONLY standard CITY bid items. • Following a 90% construction plan review meeting with the CITY, the ENGINEER shall submit Final Plans (100%) to the CITY per the approved Project Schedule. Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed by the ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. ASSUMPTIONS • All storm water calculations and design shall conform to the City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management Design Manual, March 2006. • 8 half size (11"x17") and 1 full size (2213x34") drawings and 2 specifications will be delivered for the 90% design. • A DWF file for the 90% Design will be created from design CAD drawings and will be uploaded to the project folder in Buzzsaw. • 1 full size (2213x34") drawings and 2 specifications will be delivered for the 100% design. • A DWF file for the 100% Design will be created from design CAD drawings and will be uploadeA to the project folder in Buzzsaw. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 8 of 14 DELIVERABLES construction plans specifications. B. 100% construction plans and specifications. C. Documentation of key design decisions (Project Decision Log). D. Detailed estimates of probable construction cost for the authorized construction project, including summaries of bid items and quantities using the CITY's standard bid items and format. E. Original cover mylar for the signatures of authorized CITY officials. TASK 5. BID PHASE SERVICES. ENGINEER will support the bid phase of the project as follows. 5.1. Bid Support • The ENGINEER shall upload all plans and contract documents onto Buzzsaw for access to potential bidders. • Contract documents shall be uploaded in a .pdf file. • Unit Price Proposal documents are to be created utilizing CFW Bidtools only and combined in a specified spreadsheet workbook, Bid Proposal Worksheet Template, and will be populated and configured so that all pages are complete and the Summary Worksheet(s) in the workbook detail and automatically summarize the totals from the inserted Unit Price Proposal document worksheets. • Plan Sets are to be uploaded to Buzzsaw in two formats, .pdf and .dwf files. The .pdf will consist of one file of the entire plan set. The .dwf will consist of individual files, one for each plan sheet, and will be numbered and named in a manner similar to that of the plan set index. • The ENGINEER shall sell contract documents and maintain a plan holders list on Buzzsaw from documents sold and from Contractor's uploaded Plan Holder Registrations in Buzzsaw. • The ENGINEER will develop and implement procedures for receiving and answering bidders' questions and requests for additional information. The procedures shall include a log of all significant bidders questions and requests and the response thereto. The log shall be housed and maintained in the project's Buzzsaw folder titled Request for Information. The ENGINEER will provide technical interpretation of the contract bid documents and will prepare proposed responses to all bidders questions and requests, in the form of addenda. The ENGINEER shall upload all approved addenda onto Buzzsaw and mail addenda to all plan holders. • Attend the prebid conference in support of the CITY. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: O8/27/2010 Page 9 of 14 • Assist the CITY in determining the qualifications and acceptability of prospective contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers. • When substitution prior to award of contracts is allowed in the contract documents, the ENGINEER will advise the CITY as to the acceptability of alternate materials and equipment proposed by bidders. • Attend the bid opening in support of the CITY. • Tabulate and review all bids received for the construction project, assist the CITY in evaluating bids, and recommend award of the contract. A copy of the Bid Tabulation is to be uploaded into the project's Bid Responses folder on Buzzsaw. • Assist the CITY with assembling and awarding contracts for construction, materials, equipment, and services. • Incorporate all addenda into the contract documents and issue conformed sets. 5.2 Mylar Drawings • The ENGINEER shall submit a set of sealed conformed mylar drawings for record storage. • Record Drawings shall also be submitted as an Adobe Acrobat PDF format (version 6.0 or higher) file and DWF format. There shall be one (1) PDF file and one (1) DWF file for the TPW plan set and a separate PDF and DWF file for the Water plan set. Each PDF and DWF file shall contain all associated sheets of the particular plan set. Singular PDF and DWF files for each sheet of a plan set will not be accepted. PDF and DWF files shall conform to naming conventions as follows: I. TPW file name example — "W-1956_org47.pdf" where "W-1956" is the assigned file number obtained from the CITY, org" designating the file is of an original plan set, "47" shall be the total number of sheets in this file. Example: W-0053_org3.pdf and K-0320_org5.pdf II. Water and Sewer file name example - 66X-35667_org36.pdf" where "X- 35667" is the assigned file number obtained from the CITY, "_org" designating the file is of an original plan set, "36" shall be the total number of sheets in this file. Example: X-12755_org18.pdf Both PDF and DWF files shall be uploaded to the project's Record Drawing folder in Buzzsaw. For information on the proper manner to submit files and to obtain a file number for the project, contact the Department of Transportation and Public Works Vault at City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 10 of 14 telephone number (817) 39M426. He numbers will not be issued to a project unless the appropriate project numbers and fund codes have been assigned and are in the Department of Transportation and Public Works database. ASSUMPTIONS • The project will be bid only once and awarded to one contractor. • 20 sets of conformed plans and specifications will be delivered to the CITY and made available on Buzzsaw. The 20 plans shall consist of 10 full size (2273x347y) and 10 half size (1175x17") drawings. • PDF and DWF files will be uploaded to Buzzsaw. • 1 copy conformed full size (22" x 34") mylar plans will be delivered to the CITY. A. Addenda B. Bid tabulations C. Recommendation of award D. Conformed construction documents E. Conformed mylar plans TASK 6. COI`YSTRL'CTIO Pi SASE SERVICES. ENGINEER will support the construction phase of the project as follows. 6.1 Construction Support • The ENGINEER shall attend the preconstruction conference. • After the pre -construction conference, the ENGINEER shall provide project exhibits and attend public meeting to help explain the proposed project to residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location and mail the invitation letters to the affected customers. • The ENGINEER shall attend the "Final" project walk through and assist with preparation of final punch list. DELIVERABLES A. Public meeting exhibits E. Final Punch List items TASK 7. ROW/EASEMENT SERVICES. ENGINEER will support and perform activities related to ROW and easements as outlined below, per scoping direction and guidance from the CITY's Project Manager. 7.1. Right -of -Way Research City of FortWorth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 11 of 14 • The ENGINEER shall determine rights -of -way and easement needs for construction of the project. Required temporary and permanent easements will be identified based on available information and recommendations will be made for approval by the CITY. 7.2 Right-of-Way/Easement Preparation and Submittal. • The ENGINEER shall prepare documents to be used to obtain right-of-way and permanent and/or temporary easements required to construct the improvements. • The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's Buzzsaw site. 7.3 Temporary Right of Entry Preparation and Submittal • Prior to construction, the ENGINEER shall prepare, mail and obtain Temporary Right of Entries from landowners. It is assumed that letters will only be required for land owners adjacent to temporary construction easements or who are directly affected by the project and no easement is required to enter their property. • The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's Buzzsaw site. ASSUMPTIONS • 3 Temporary Right of Entry Letters will be prepared for this project • Right-O) vvay r eseaar d i lnc[Wes r evie'vv 01 property/right-of-way records based 011 current internet based Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) information available at the start of the project and available on -ground property information (i.e. iron rods, fences, stakes, etc.). It does not include effort for chain of title research, parent track research, additional research for easements not included in the TAD, right-of-way takings, easement vacations and abandonments, right-of-way vacations, and street closures. DELIVERABLES A. Right -of -Way, easement exhibits and metes and bounds provided on CITY forms B. Temporary Right of Entry Letters TASK 8. SURVEY. ENGINEER will provide survey support as follows. 8.1 Design Survey • ENGINEER will perform field surveys to collect horizontal and vertical elevations and other information needed by ENGINEER in design and preparation of plans for the project. Information gathered during the survey shall include topographic data, utilities as required by the SUE, structures, trees (measure caliper, identify overall canopy, and have qualified arborist identify species of trees), and other features relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at intersections will City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 12 of 14 be verified by field surveys. Spot elevations will be shown on intersection layouts with cross slope to fit intersecting grade lines. • The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include the following: - A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400: - The following information about each Control Point; a. Identified (Existing. CITY Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8" Iron Rod) b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system, and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on CITY Datum only. c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and North Main Street). 8.2. Temporary Right of Entry Preparation and Submittal • Prior to entering property for field survey, the ENGINEER shall prepare, mail and obtain Temporary Right of Entry from landowners. • The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's Buzzsaw site. V ELIAMLEJ A. Copies of field survey data and notes signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor. B. Drawing of the project layout with dimensions and coordinate list. TASK 9. PERMITTING. ENGINEER will provide permitting support for the CITY to obtain any and all agreements and/or permits normally required for a project of this size and type, as follows 9.1. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan • For projects that disturb an area greater than one (1) acre, ENGINEER will prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) required for the Project for use by the Contractor during construction. ENGINEER will prepare drawings and details for proposed SWPPP improvement that the Contractor must use during construction. Contractor will be responsible for filing the SWPPP with appropriate regulatory agencies. 9.2. Floodplain Services • The area will be in the Zone X, no permit is required. ASSUMPTIONS • Amount of disturbed area for construction will be less than 5 acres and will not require a Notice of Intent or Notice of Termination submittal to TCEQ. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 13 of 14 DELIVERABLES A. 2 copies of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans document with Erosion Control sheets. B. Erosion Control Sheets will not be placed in the construction set of plans. ADDITIONAL SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THE EXISTING SCOPE OF SERVICES Additional Services not included in the existing Scope of Services —CITY and ENGINEER agree that the following services are beyond the Scope of Services described in the tasks above. However, ENGINEER can provide these services, if needed, upon the CITY's written request. Any additional amounts paid to the ENGINEER as a result of any material change to the Scope of the Project shall be agreed upon in writing by both parties before the services are performed. These additional services include the following: • Negotiation of easements or property acquisition. • Services related to development of the CITY's project financing and/or budget. • Services related to disputes over pre -qualification, bid protests, bid rejection and re -bidding of the contract for construction. • Construction management and inspection services • Performance of materials testing or specialty testing services. • Services necessary due to the default of the Contractor. • Services related to damages caused by fire, flood, earthquake or other acts of God. • Services related to warranty claims, enforcement an -a' inspection after final completion. • Services to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. • Performance of miscellaneous and supplemental services related to the project as requested by the CITY. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 08/27/2010 Page 14 of 14 Attachment B AT I AL; HEMt: B COMPENSATION DESIGN SERVICES FOR City Project No.: 00672 I. Compensation A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated a total lump sum fee of $122078 as summarized in Exhibit 13-1 — Engineer Invoice and Section IV — Summary of Total Project Fees. The total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment A, including all labor materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to deliver the services. B. The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Section II - Method of Payment. Each invoice is to be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this contract by an officer of the ENGINEER. II. Method of Payment A. Partial payment shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon City's approval of an invoice prepared and submitted by the ENGINEER in the format and including content as presented in Exhibit B-1, Progress Reports as required in item III of this Attachment B, and Schedule as required in Attachment D to this Agreement. B. The estimated current physical percent complete as required on the invoice shall be calculated from the progress schedule as required in Attachment D to this Standard Agreement and according to the current version of the City of Fort C. The cumulative sum of such monthly partial fee payments shall not exceed the total current project budget including all approved Amendments. p. Each invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this Agreement by an officer of the ENGINEER. III. Progress Reports A. The ENGINEER shall prepare and submit to the designated representative of the Transportation and Public Works Department monthly progress reports and schedules in the format required by the City. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 Page 1 of 2 B-1 Attachment B A I ACHEMENT B COMPENSATION DESIGN SERVICES FOR UPPER SIERRA VISTA DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City Project No.: 00672 �Va Summary of Total Project Fees Firm Prima Res onsibilit Fee Amount Prime Consultant A.N.A. Consultants Engineering and Project Management $ 109,878.00 90% Proposed M/WBE Sub -Consultants S ntec Engineering, Inc. Geotech and Storm Water Pollution Prevention $ 127200,00 10% Non=M/WBE SubConsultants None $ - 0% Total Fee $ 122,078,00 1 100% Project Number and Name Total Fee M/VVBE Fee MWBE UPPER SIERRA VISTA DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS; City Project No.: 00672 $ 122,078000 $ 125200,00 10% Cit�r M/WBE Goal=10% City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 Page 2 of 2 Consultant Commited Goal=10% B-2 (0 E E 2 N ¢ d L x W Y O � Z O N x W � W O 2 J 0 Z Z J W Q w W Y W J � z � a � w O � Ww��0 � � LL W G aOwo o-' d 2 W LL � � �o W � } Z F a` � U' y a > w � � w U @ O x w_ Oa N a w w p O a z � � � O� Q x w LL m U' Z H J 0 E 0 �o � N O N U rn p o o p o 0 0 o p o 00 0 0 � p o 0 o p o 0o p o o 0 0 0 0 o p o p o o p o 0 0 o p o 0 o p o 0 o p o p 0 o p o 0 o p o � �, p 0 0 O O O O O O N O N O �% N O O p 0 0 p?< N N O h O N O O O A A O y Q N Q N Ol 1p 01 ® � N< �O M Q � b Q N h M Q b N N f0 � O V' O Q O at C W OD O N N � (O N � Y1 e- p N p M N M ' N O O ' � M N N N e- N 1� t� 10 N N M dip 19 v7tR eRM W fR �1RfPrMfR � FRMMM diM eR �Mf91A �ilR b3IR �f9 N O O b W V C Ol NM,. � M��� N N N � p� b N c- O O yNj M N P N r N^ <D N tO') N � q� N b 0 0 O 1p t1 M N l0 N 1� N m V O b b M f- b b � �- b b � M N � N N E � N Q N A � N M M N a- e � � b b e .r a O V �p m Q A N M N A A b Q b b N N � N N N � O ry � N (0 a 3 N � J � d •' E c o e- S N U y M u p d Y a d Z y E � .. N d � � w v m � Y o c o G y oaUt � r� � d� r�Y a o�� :� E Q o h m � m � o�� �hEco9 d wd � �� `° y u A �i o a c H .mod. i m� G w t Y o `o `° m m` G m G � c a 5 c' � �� N w M m •y a E a m E U d w m K 'n m y� a �' m is a�i 1� E `o c� � � cr d c+ o d io Y 10 c d '^ � ._ o a � a �� E y C ~ w 0 m U .� �= Z Z Z a a� udi cd+ �� U d 3�� c d d y H Y W O~ a m m y y� E rf '� a E d � m> 'Y o o c � � O U f� m U C O O C C N N �N �> O y io G~ d d N d� b W C C�— d w; n � a c >>> c y� c c o �� o u d `'- c� o o d o '� •y d •� � .� p� j o : u o chi w d�� J J J G a a c � d E y v' 'io w 01 >>>> an .q v d� d m d U o o� y �' L m y y : d o. •� d d m ._ c d x� Da m®'dClaa�oaa� 4aaN GC9C7 d W ¢aU� y � = UUba � C d V � y � d L N � ate. U N y U � y +. C1 i� U � a C9 U 4 � a 0 0 co N M O f") O V m Z E E N Q X W N H 00 x x W 0 :° 0 �o � N C Q O m U O m J Z Q N Y Q F- r W Q a W a r F- U w O a LL 0 Z Y Q w m Y Z �_ W W 2 H LL 0 J W W J r z W �' W LL LL O LL } �_ U d x U a w LL O 2 LL IO V Z �'• J O LL W �° w N Z c� w 0 H Z W W 0 a a 0 a r a w W a a � � W Z U � o a` _a U O p o 0 0 o p o _ O p o _ O p o 0 0 o O o o O O o 0 o O O p O p o 0 0 0 0 o O p o O p o 0 0 0 0 0 o O p o 0 0 0 O OQ� O O O O ON O Om O OyM O N O N O O O 1n H M O O � O o Q � O � O Q M QQ � � 47 O O M O N r N � O M b N � Y'1 �- O y Q O � � N M OO Mori e� � •• 00 f"1 N � O � Of OD �! O M � �- � N N fp f`i lrj O �j � Ia 0 00 � to M t� U p `o m EF! fq MY !9 !R Vf �? tli " � {A 61q. p - � 6f> fy M e9 19 t9 <9 69 W � <9 !H IA H} Eq dq fy E^A m tp Q fO N Q N N 10 ID fD Q �p O � Q � q Q Q M � .- � �•. y O H N N h y Q Q Q _ _ o p I- _ N r � O o 0 O � � o s O U U � � Q� O N N b 0 N M W Q Q Q Q M N >. M M M N U1 � C � N O y � 7 G �_ W N � O ep (D �D � s � N O � W U N av U K s � � c s 0 O � � � rn � U U � Q � W N O J N � Z � M � � C N O N Q b tD �D N fD a- Q Q Q M � � O m � N L O� H � c N ry '� M � � we � m t m � � o � a` 10 E � a r U O c co a` vs d II I � I I � •U1 a� 0 c .` d d c w e m O � O r o\'\' � � O Y fi N A � C H G N •y m � W u am �° � 9 o C � � 2 ad+ y O O Of � C � � N _ Q ate+ (.i N O c w j m Y � m ,Q � � d"m y¢ y3 t � «: w uE 1�� d m u, � V C r O N rnam R� L O m 9 Y p C •� Y � Z � C U �U c H�LL Y v a y u c� `� m 10v `m c�i a y c C N m .o c m c o� s c c�i O y U w c y V W d c Z '� �n c 'a � c m� aci � c�a E "cAQ m 'oaf o `o y'�°�"c�p� y c E V � d y C F •; � c .�d.. _ � o y 'y O d y � �y°mo !'Oa a EmDc gm Q � �NmoQ a d � G m m V Q i 3� �' N o�< c� � Q c '° c O �� 7� i0 u�.s� cc' ��•u� � �mwomym fA L. C c 16 m>£ m wd. c a C1 m m .O 'C v °' c � a 3 '> y d C O d a m= m Y u w O l`Lam�a m ma Q 3a Q O ma �m QCa p „�•, o � O yaaa` m O = A j �~ C� m ` �� O O y O V � •N �� .�. .�-. � u u a o w� ; p c 5 p� �m c> cn•�iL �a oa � _ • C U a� � N C O d u. � U a � M � N � M � OO 00 00 O O O O O M R 00 OO 00 O • O • � O O O a m Attachment B , City Prtrject No. t3{t6�2 I. Compensation A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated a total lump sum fee of $132362 as summarized in Exhibit 13-1 — Engineer Invoice and Section IV — Summary of Total Project Fees. The total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment A, including all labor materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to deliver the services. B. The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Section II Method of Payment. Each invoice is to be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this contract by an officer of the ENGINEER. Ili. Method aIr Payment A. Partial payment shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon City's approval of an invoice prepared and submitted by the ENGINEER in the format and including content as presented in Exhibit B-1, Progress Reports as required in item III of this Attachment B, and Schedule as required in Attachment D to this Agreement. B. The estimated current physical percent complete as required on the invoice shall be calculated from the progress schedule as required in Attachment D to this Standard Agreement and according to the current version of the City of Fort C. The cumulative sum of such monthly partial fee payments shall not exceed the total current project budget including all approved Amendments. p. Each invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this Agreement by an officer of the ENGINEER. Ili. Progress Rep®rts A. The ENGINEER shall prepare and submit to the. designated representative of the Transportation and Public Works Department monthly progress reports and schedules in the format required by the City, city of Fort vVorth„ Texas Atfacf7ment B PNtO Official Release Date: 5.19.2i?10 Page 1 of 2 I� Attachment B ATTACHEMENT B COMPENSATION DESIGN SERVICES FOR UPPER SIERRA VISTA DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City Project No.: 00672 ��• Summary of Total Project Fees Firm Primar Res onsibilit Fee Amoun# Prime Consultant A.N.R. Consultants Engineering and Project iManagement $ 116,672.0Q 88�; Proposed M/WBE Sub -Consultants S ntec Engineering, Inc. Geotech and Storm Water Pollution Prevention $ 6,450.00 511b Gorrondona &Associates Subsurface Utility Engineering $ 9,240.00 7°10 Nan-MNUBE SubConsultanis None $ Oho Total Fee $ 132,362.00 100% Project Number and Name Total Fee M/WBE Fee MWBE UPPER SIERRA VISTA DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: City Project No nn672 $ 132,362:00 $ 15,690.00 i 120! C;ty M/'WBE Goal-1 City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 Page 2 of 2 Consultant Commited Goal=12% 10J2612010 City Project No.: QO€7Z ransporiationir Lot ic HorKs.. Engineering I Service Improvements Compensation Paving and Drainage ii • Services Fee Total $ 116,375*00 TotalSurvey Services Fee • ' r f i 1 Additional .tal $69027400 Reproductfon" i Ot /% Subcontractor Admin.•9%i rotal Amendment • 2 Fee ! i Exhiat A-i fee-Aed�n# 2-Oit3450.x(s 83�-1 Level of Effort Spreadsheet TASK/HOUR BREAKDOWN Design Services for UPPER SIERRA VISTA DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City Project No.: 00672 Labor Ihours Ex ense Project Design Surveyor SUET Geotech Survey FieldEngineer/ Office Task Description Total Labor Total Expense Task No. Principal Crew CADD Tech Subconsultant Task Sub Total Manager g En g ineer RPLS Crew and Ri g survey Intern Su Support Cost Travel Reproduction Cast 2-Man Rate $160 S145 $135 $135 $190 $130 $110 $85 $80 MWBE Non-MWBE 1 Project Management 20 100 20 t 1 1 12 1 1 f so so i S150 1 $21,8701 1.1 Mana in the Team 20 48 8 0 0 8 0 0 $12.120 $0 $0 SG S150 $150 $12,270 1. i. l Internal Team Meetings 4 8 8 8 $3, 760 so $3, 760 1.1.2 QA:'QC 16 40 $8, 360 S 150 $150 $8, 510 1.2 Communications and Reporting 0 52 12 0 0 4 0 0 59.600 $0 SO S0 SO $0 $9,600 1.2.1 Pre -Design Coordination Meeting 2 2 $560 $o $560 1.2.2 Quarterly Project Update Meet) n s 4 4 4 $1,560 s0 $1,560 1.2.3 Design Submittal Review Meetings 6 6 $1,680 $0 $1,680 1.2.4 Prepare Baseline Schedule 8 $1,160 $0 $1.160 Prepare Monthly Progress Reports with a 1.2.5 Schedule 10 $1,450 So $1.450 1.2.6 Prepare MonthlMWBE Reports 12 $1,740 80 S1,740 1.2.7 Ovoicin 10 $15450 $0 $1,450 1 Conceptual,- , 1 36 , 1 1 93 , i $15,235 $9,240 1 $0 2.1 Data Collection 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 $440 $0 $440 Drainage Computations and Drainage Area T 2.2 Map 0 0 14 0 0 0 38 0 0 $69070 $0 $6,070 2.3 Subsurface Utility Engineering $0 $9,240 S45 $9,285 S9.285 2.4 Design Drawings 0 0 17 0 0 0 43 0 0 $7.025 $36 $36 S7.061 2.5 Project Decision Log0 1 0 0 2 0 0 $635 $0 S635 2.6 Construction Estimate 0 0 3 0 01 01 _ 61 0 0 $1,0651 1 $0 $1,065 1 Preliminary D- .1 - , 1 1 4 1 171 -0 --0 1 $6,450 so so 3.1 0 1 128 17 Preliminary Design Drawings 0 4 0 0 118 0 0 $15,815 $135 $135 $15,950 3.2 Geotech Investigation/Pavement Design $0 $6,450 $100 S69550 S6.550 3.3 Constructability Review 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 $600 $0 S600 _ 3.4 Public Meeting 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 $1.015 $50 $50 $1,065 3.5 Utility Clearance 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 $1,150 So $1.150 3.6 Traffic Control Plan 0 0 u 7 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 3.7 IProject Decision Log 0 0 150 01 01 4 0 0 $710 $0 $710 3.8 Construction Estimate 0 0 T 0 0 30 sa 0 $3.840 $0 $3.840 0 Final Design 1 4 50 1 1 1 118 1 1 $20,310 so $0 so , 9864 Final Draft (90%) Construction Plans and 4.1 Specifications 0 0 22 0 0 0 54 0 0 - 0 $8,910 $6,120 - _ S295 S259 $295 $259 $9,205 $6.379 4-2Final (100%) Plans and Specifications 0 0 16 0 0 0 36 0 4.3 Project Decision Los (90%and 100%) 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 $1,560 $0 $1 560 4.4 Construction Estimates (900� and 100%) 0 0 e8 0 0 0 24 0 0 $3,720 $0 S3.720 1 Bid Phase / 3 16 i 1 1 6 1 8 $3,895 .1 so so $2,635 $29635 $69530 5.1 113id Su art 01 31 161 01 0 I 0 G 0 $ $3.895 $0 $0 $0 S21635 $2,635 $64530 Sell Contract Documents and Maintain 5.1.1 Plan Holders List 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 $10300 $2, 635 $2, 635 $3, 935 Gity of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B -Leval ofi Effort Supplement PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 Level or Effort Spreadsheet TASK/HOUR BREAKDOWN Design Services for UPPER SIERRA VISTA DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City Project No.: 00672 Task No. Task Description p Labor hours Total Labor Cost Ex ense Total Expense Cost Task Sub Total Principal Project Proj � Manager n Design 9 Engineer Surveyor y RPLS SUE/ Geotech Crew and Rig Survey Field Crew Man) Engineer/ Survey Intern CADD Tech Office Support Subconsultant Travel Reproduction Rate $160 $145 $135 $135 $190 $130 $110 S85 S80 MWBE Non-MWBE 5.1.2 Issue Addenda 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 $540 SO $540 5. 1.3 Attend Pre -bid Conference 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 $280 SO S280 5.1.4 Attend Bid Opening 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 S280 50 $280 5. 1.5 Tabulate Bids and Recommend Award 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 S635 S0 $635 5.1,6 Issue Conformed Contract Documents 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 S860 SO S860 6.1 Construction Support 0 15 16 0 J e 0 6 0 0 0 i 0 $4.335 a0 50 SO 50 SO $4.335 6.1.1 Attend Preconstruction Conference 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 $135 SO $135 6. 1.2 Attend Public Meeting0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 S560 SO $560 6.1.3 Project Site Visits 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 51.120 $0 $1,120 6.1.4 Submittal Review 0 4 4 0 0 0 i7 0 0 $1, 120 $0 $1.120 6.1.5 Request for lnformation,Change Order Review 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 $1, 120 SO $1.120 6.1,61 Final Walk Through and Punch List 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 S280 $0 $280 6.2 lRecord Drawings 1 0 01 2 0 0 Q 6 01 0 S930 S333 $333 $1.263 7.1 Right -of -Way Research 01 01 1)1 81 of 6 :321 01 of S5.380 $0 i $5,386 ERight-of-Way/Easement 7.2 Preparation and Submittal 0 0 0 Q 0 0 if.) 0 $0 $0 $0 7.3 Temporary Right of Entry Submittal 0 0 ,) 0 0 1 01 t) 1 0 Q $0 $Q $Q 8.1 gDesign burvey 1 i0- 01 01 _—AY 01 4 41 r Q1 401 28 0 01 r S8,820 r i ,! r $01 .r S8,820 8,2 Tem ora Fight of Ent Submittal 0 0 0 0 01 0 4 10 51.140 $0 51,140 8.3 Construction Surve 0 Q 0 0 0 T Q Q 0 0 $0 $Q $0 • r 9A Permitting SWPPP r 0 0 0 10 10 r 0 0 r 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 $5,750 $5,750 r $420 r S4217 $6,170 9.2 Environmental Services 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 $0 9.3 Flood fain Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 SO $0 9.4 TxDOT 0 0 0 EE 00 0 0 $0 SO $0 9.5 Railroad 0 U 0 0 0 U 0 $0 SO $0 9,6 TDLR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SO SO s0 9.7 City of Fort Worth Parks Conversion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 $O SO SO Totals 20 123 178 16 0 46 506 4 18 $110,645 $15,690 $0 $0 $4,458 S204148 $130,793 Project Summary Total Nours 911 Total Labor $110,645 Total Ex ense $20,148 MWBE Subconsultant $15,690 Nan MWBE Subconsultant $0 10% Sub Markup $1,569 MWBE Participation 12% Total Project Cost $132,362 City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment 8 - Leve! of Effort Supplement PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 2of2 •I 1'' • DATE: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 REFERENCE NO.: **C-24871 I,OG NAME: 20AMEND 2 UPPER SIERRA VISTA SUBJECT: Authorize Amendment No. 2 in the Amount of $132,362.00 to City Secretary Contract No. 37390, an Engineering Agreement with ANA Consultants L.L.C., for the Storm Water Utility Project —Upper Sierra Vista —Detention Drainage Design —Phase 1 (COUNCIL DISTRICT 8) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $132,362.00 to City Secretary Contract No. 37390 with ANA Consultants L.L.C., revising the total contract cost to $164,486,00, DISCUSSION: The Storm Water Management Program was established to reduce flooding in Fort Worth, preserve streams, minimize water pollution and to operate the storm water system in a more effective manner to fully comply with state and federal regulatory requirements. This will be accomplished by infrastructure reconstruction and system maintenance, master planning, enhanced development review and increased public education and outreach. On October 16, 2007, (Ordinance No. 17840-10-2007) the City Council authorized the issuance and sale of $2510009000 in Storm Water (Drainage) Capital Projects Revenue Bonds 2007 to fund a two—year Storm Water Capital project program. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) request through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was initiated by Pate Engineers of Dallas, Texas, in 2006, for the proposed Sierra Vista residential development. In this study it was determined that the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) culvert was severely restricting flows. As a result, the La Acienda Apartment Complex and several other properties located along Mississippi Avenue, Baker Street and Glen Garden have experienced flooding. In 2007, the City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management Division staff identified that a valley storage basin could be designed and constructed on City property to minimize the flooding of the nearby apartment complex and homes. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to provide drainage design was issued by the City in August 2007 and 26 design consultants submitted Statements of Qualifications, including ANA Consultants, L.L.C. (ANA Consultants). ANA Consultants was selected to study the drainage in the subject area. On August 1, 2008, the City Manager executed administratively an Engineering Agreement with ANA Consultants (City Secretary Contract No. 37390) in the amount of $19,104.00 for a study of the Sierra Vista residential development. The preliminary study results indicated that retaining walls of a significant height would be required to detain the drainage on the existing City property. Adjacent property was identified that could be utilized as additional storage and would not require retaining walls. It would be necessary for the City to acquire this adjacent property, if it was to be used. Therefore, additional engineering analysis was needed to evaluate the proposed detention areas to determine the best alternative. On August 25, 2009, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $13,020.00. This Amendment provided the following: &bull; Additional survey and hydraulic modeling analysis; and &bull; Alternatives for development to include preliminary grading plans and cost estimates to determine which alternative provided the maximum benefit to the community. The results of the additional evaluation done as part of Amendment No. 1 indicated that a phased approach for the project will alleviate some of the area's flooding and will provide a 100—year flood protection once both phases of the project are completed. Phase 1 of the project will be designed and built at the property already owned by the City. Phase 2 of the project will be constructed on the adjacent property, which will need to be acquired. Amendment No. 2 for the subject Engineering Agreement will provide the following: &bull; Engineering analysis and design for the Phase 1 detention basin proposed in the Upper Sierra Vista Drainage Study (approximately three acres). &bull; Topographic survey needed for the detailed design of the detention basin. &bull; Detailed detention analysis and cost estimate for Phase 2 as a part of the concept report. &bull; Preparation of engineering plans and contract documents for the bidding and construction of Phase 1 of the recommended improvements. ANA Consultants, L.L.C., proposes to perform the design services for a lump sum fee of $132,362.00. City staff considers the fee to be fair and reasonable for the scope of services proposed. ANA Consultants, L.L.C., is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance by committing to 12 percent M/WBE participation. The City's goal on the project is 12 percent. This project. is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 8 Mapsco 77Y. FISCAL INFORMATION: The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current capital budget, as appropriated of the Storm Water Capital Projects 2007 Revenue Bond Fund. FUND CENTERS: TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers P229 531200 208280067230 $122.402.00 P229 531200 208280067251 9 960.00 CERTIFICATIONS: Submitted for City Manager's Office b� Fernando Costa (6122) Originating Department Head. Greg Simmons (7862) Additional Information Contact: Felipe Pulido (8178701129) ATTACHMENTS 1. 00672 MWBE Compliance.pdf 2. FAR-006 72-00002-A2.12df 3. M AND C 00672.pdf