Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIR 8978INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS No. 8978 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council September 16, 2008 Page 1 of 2 SUBJECT: CITY - INITIATED FULL - PURPOSE ANNEXATION OF FOUR ENCLAVES ON KELLER HICKS ROAD, BOAT CLUB ROAD, AND CHAPIN ROAD AND CITY - INITIATED LIMITED - PURPOSE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE SH 121/FM 1187 MIXED -USE GROWTH CENTER City - Initiated Full- Purpose Annexations The September 23 City Council agenda will contain four M &Cs to initiate the annexation and zoning process for four enclaves. The 2008 -2012 annexation program, adopted with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, recommends that these areas be considered for full- purpose annexation in 2008. Attached is a PowerPoint for reference. The fiscal impact analyses are posted on the Planning and Development Department's website at: hftp://www.fortworthc or g/planninganddevelopment /design aspx?id =8660. The four enclaves are described below: • Area 11 in the Far North sector contains 62.4 acres of land in a developing area, east of 1- 35W and along Keller Hicks Road, and would be an addition to Council District 2. Annexation of Area 11 is expected to create a positive impact on the General Fund and will require capital improvements to improve three arterial roadways. • Area 23 -1 in the Far Northwest sector contains 193.0 acres and is the remainder of the Parks at Boat Club preliminary plat, which proposes low density residential, commercial, and institutional uses. Area 23 -1 would be an addition to Council District 7. Annexation of this enclave is expected to have a positive impact on the General Fund and will require capital improvements to improve three arterial roadways. • Area 54 in the Far Northwest sector contains 25.7 acres with non - residential uses. Area 54 would be an addition to Council District 7. Annexation of this enclave is expected to have a cumulative positive impact on the General Fund and will require capital improvements to improve one roadway. • Area 64 in the Far West sector contains 1 acre with a single family residence that would be an addition to Council District 3. Annexation of this enclave is expected to have a positive impact on the General Fund and will not require any capital improvements. Staff has determined that the City will be able to provide full municipal services upon annexation, in accordance with the City's annexation policy. Staff has also proposed zoning districts based on land use policies and future land use in the Comprehensive Plan, land uses proposed by the property owners, and existing land uses. Staff has contacted the property owners by mail to explain the annexation process and by telephone to discuss appropriate zoning for the property. The property owners had previously received notices during the preparation of the annexation program. The annexation and zoning of these areas would run concurrently, with final annexation and zoning action occurring on December 2, 2008. Two of the four areas contain land with current agricultural exemptions that qualify for development agreements in lieu of annexation. Acceptance of the development agreement by the property owners would affect the amount of land that the City could annex. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS NO. 1 8978 To the Mayor and Members of the City Council September 16, 2008 Page 2of2 SUBJECT: CITY - INITIATED FULL - PURPOSE ANNEXATION OF FOUR ENCLAVES ON KELLER HICKS ROAD, BOAT CLUB ROAD, AND CHAPIN ROAD AND CITY - INITIATED LIMITED - PURPOSE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE SH 121/17M 1187 MIXED -USE GROWTH CENTER City-lnitiated Limited - Purpose Annexation The September 23 City Council agenda will also contain one M &C to initiate the limited- purpose annexation and zoning process for a designated mixed -use growth center. The 2008 -2012 annexation program identifies this area (area 56) for limited- purpose annexation in 2008, with full - purpose annexation in 2011. Area 56 is comprised of 575.5 acres containing predominantly vacant land at the intersection of proposed highways SH 121T and FM 1187 (SH 121T /FM 1187 Mixed -Use Growth Center) and would be an addition to Council District 6. SH 121T is expected to be completed in 2012, with development activity anticipated prior to its completion. Annexing this area for limited purposes at this time will allow the property to develop consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the area be zoned "MU -1" Low Intensity Mixed -Use. Staff has contacted the property owners by mail to explain the annexation process and by telephone to discuss appropriate zoning for the property. The property owners had previously been contacted during the preparation of the annexation program. Staff has prepared the draft fiscal impact analysis and regulatory plan in accordance with the annexation policy. Staff has found that the annexation would have a long -term positive impact on the General Fund, and will require capital improvements to serve the area when annexed for full purposes. The area contains land with agricultural exemptions that qualify for development agreements in lieu of annexation. Should any development agreements be accepted by the property owners, the amount of land that the City may annex for limited purposes will be reduced. Should you have any questions, please contact Susan Alanis, Planning and Development Director, at 817 -392 -8180. Da a A. Flssele , P. . City Manager Attachment ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER FORT WORTH, TEXAS 2 2008 IMPLEMENTATION OF ANNEXATION PROGRAM FORTWORTH Prepared for the City Council By the Planning and Development Department September 16, 2008 �I Review the following items: ✓ Annexation criteria ✓ Fiscal impact methodology; ✓ Areas proposed for full- purpose annexation in 2008; and ✓ Areas proposed for limited- purpose annexation in 2008. 4 M ANNEXATION CRITERIA A. Full-Purpose Annexation Area must meet one or more of the following conditions: 1. Enclave a. Enclave within City's ETJ b, Ability to provide municipal services 2. Urban Development a. Development activity of an urban nature b_ Ability to provide municipal services C. Positive fiscal impact analysis 3. Growth Center a. Designated growth center b. Ability to provide municipal services c. Positive fiscal impact analysis 4. Adverse Impact a. Adverse impact on City if not annexed b. Ability to provide municipal services S. Option to Expand a. Detriment to City's orderly growth if not annexed b. Ability to provide municipal services t I General Fund Property taxes to be generated by existing land uses, based on Tarrant Appraisal District assessed values and the City's current property tax rate. 2. Property taxes to be generated by proposed land uses, based on anticipated assessed values and the City's current property tax rate. 3. Other General Fund revenues including: Other Local Taxes, Licenses and Permits, Fines and Forfeitures, Use of Money and property. Service Charges, and Other Revenue, based on a per capita estimate. REVENUES (cont.) Water and Sewer Fund* 5. Water and wastewater connection and impact fees. 6. Water and wastewater service fees. * Not incorporated into fiscal impact analysis. I f EXPENDITURES 1. One -time transitional costs, including street signs and markings, and emergency response set up 2. Required capital improvements for fire service, roadways and drainage, and water and wastewater infrastructure W r I AREA #11 (AX -08 -005) ANALYSIS BASIS • Existing residential, commercial, and vacant land • 62.4 acres • Two agricultural exemptions • General commercial future land use • No concept plan or preliminary plat on file No short term growth • Property tax revenues — $42,610 yearly 10 ANALYSIS RESULTS • Initial Costs — TPW - $0 start up services and $10,000 routine maintenance costs for existing roadways — Police Department - $3,738 — Health / Animal Care and Control - $244 — Code Enforcement - $30,961 • Capital improvements necessary to improve three arterial roadways • Net positive result to the General Fund I 0 What zoning is proposed for AX -08 -005? A -5: One - Family E: Neighborhood Commercial FR, G General Commercial Restricted, Intensive Commercial 13 Rezoning area consists of a total of 27 parcels. 14 AREA #23 -1 (AX -08 -006) 0 ANALYSIS BASIS • Existing electrical transmission lines, residential, commercial, church • 193.0 acres • Four agricultural and one absolute exemptions • Rural residential, single family, neighborhood commercial, general commercial, institutional future land uses • Parks at Boat Club preliminary plat on file • Short term growth • Property tax revenues 15 — $55,110 yearly I ANALYSIS RESULTS • Initial Costs — TPW - $0 start up services and $13,000 routine maintenance costs for existing roadways — Police Department - $9,345 — Health / Animal Care and Control - $244 — Code Enforcement - $30,961 • Capital improvements necessary to improve three arterial roadways • Net positive result to the General Fund What future land use is designated in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and what is the surrounding zoning? AG: Agricultural PAM Rural Residential A-43: One- Famity Single Family ', R1: Zero Lot Line/Cluster' Private Open C: Medium Density Space Institutional � I oecx 40V Neighborhood Commercial r etc txmreM tutus ,,< Commercial � G: Intensive Commercial' General Commercial Infrastructure4c c a tr .8 Rezoning area consists of a total of 16 parcels. 1 ` - ',✓`^"'ry���e.- ..ate,... �^� fa�'ae AQ What zoning is proposed for AX -08 -006? AG: Agricultural A-43: One- Famity A- 5: One-Family ', R1: Zero Lot Line/Cluster' >r C: Medium Density Multifamily I oecx 40V CF: Community Facilities E: Neighborhood txmreM tutus ,,< Commercial � G: Intensive Commercial' L- -- --- -- wrrx eucx tr .8 Rezoning area consists of a total of 16 parcels. 1 IM (AX-00-007) ANALYSIS BASIS • Single family, neighborhood commercial, and infrastructure future land uses • 25.7 acres • No exemptions • Existing electrical transmission lines and commercial uses • No concept plan or preliminary plat on file • No short term growth • Property tax revenues — $14,684 yearly 20 r, ANALYSIS RESULTS • Initial Costs — TPW - $0 start up services and $2,000 routine maintenance costs for existing roadways — Police Department - $2,937 — Health / Animal Care and Control - $244 — Code Enforcement - $30,961 • Capital improvements necessary to improve one arterial roadway • Cumulative positive result to the General Fund 21 What future land use is designated in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and what is the surrounding zoning I 22� Single - Family Residential ,g`-- Neighborhood Commercial Infrastructure I 22� What zoning is proposed for AX -08 -007? � ❑ A -5: One - Family E: Neighborhood Commercial 23 Rezoning area consists of a total of 7 parcels. 24 (AX -08 -009) ANALYSIS BASIS • Existing single family residence • 1.0 acre • One homestead exemption • Neighborhood commercial land use • Chapel Creek Ranch concept plan on file • No short term growth • Property tax revenues — $582 yearly 25 26 ANALYSIS RESULTS • Initial Costs — TPW - $0 start up services and routine maintenance costs for exiting roadway — Police Department - $267 — Health / Animal Care and Control - $244 — Code Enforcement - $0 • No capital improvements necessary • Net positive result to the General Fund t What zoning is proposed for AX -08 -009? WG" RR7GE ENSEWWA M DRY V kLLE V --- - -- Y A-43: One-Family � cturn� f� 28 Rezoning area consists of a total of 1 parcel. r What is the proposed annexation and zonin schedule for areas 11, 23 -1, 54, and 64? Date Action Sept. 23 City Council adopts annexation timetable; approves M &C to initiate zoning. Nov. 4 City Council conducts first public hearing. Nov. 11 City Council conducts second public hearing. Nov. 12 Zoning Commission recommends zoning. Dec. 2 City Council considers and institutes approval of annexation and zoning. 29 prr • • i �J (AX -08 -010) 31 What future land use is designated in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and what is the surrounding zoning? 32 In Mixed -Use v ANALYSIS BASIS • Single family and one business • 575.5 acres • Six agricultural exemptions and one absolute exemption — Two single family residences — One commercial business • No short term growth • Property tax revenues — $9,891 yearly 33 ANALYSIS RESULTS • Initial Costs — TPW - $0 start up services and routine maintenance costs will begin after full - purpose annexation for existing roadways — Health / Animal Care and Control - $244 — Code Enforcement $30,961 • Capital improvements will be necessary after full- purpose annexation • Cumulative positive result to the General Fund ag 0 What is the proposed annexation and zonin schedule for area 56? Date Action Sept. 23 City Council adopts annexation timetable; approves M &C to initiate zoning. Oct. 28 City Council conducts first public hearing. Nov. ll City Council conducts second public hearing. Nov. 12 Zoning Commission recommends zoning. Dec. 2 City Council considers and institutes approval of limited purpose annexation and zoning.