HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5181 OROINf'M E N0.-- -
ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR PART OF THE COST
OF IaIPROVING A PORTION OF- .LITTIEPAGE STREET
AND PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE
VF('V OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS: FIXING CHARGES AND LIENS AGAINST ABUTTING
'ROPERTY THEREON, AND AGAINST THE OWNERS THEREOF: PROVIDING FOR THE
,LECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFI-
CATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF: RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE RIGHT
TO ALLOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE RESPECTIVE ASSESSMENT TO
THE EXTENT OF ANY CREDIT GRANTED: DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO EN-
GROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FORT WORTH, AND BY FILING THE ORDINANCE
IN THE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF SAID CITY: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
V,HEREAS,the City of Fort Worth,Texas,has heretofcro ordered that each of the hereinafter described
c ct�eets, avenues and public plaecs 'I C t*r of Fc-rt« oath;Texas,be iroprored by raising,grading,
?it?ir; and by constructing thereon tc 'wit:
1. LITTLEPAGE STR ET: From, IJalvey Avenue to Calmont Avenue,
known and designated as Unit No. 1, a
6 inch hot-frA x asphaltic concrete surface
on a 30 foot roadway.
2. HEL;.ICK AVENUE; From Horne Street to Faron Street, known
and designated as Unit No. 2, a 6 inch
hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a
36 foot roadway.
3. HELi'.:ICK AVENUE: From Faron Street to Bourine Street,
known and designated as Unit No. 3, a
6 inch hot-r.:ix asphaltic concrete surface
on a 36 foot roadway.
4. HELNICK AVENUE: From Bourine Street to Hervie Street,
known and designated as Unit No. 4, a
6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface
on a 36 foot roadway.
5. HELiwIICK AVENUE: From Hervie Street to Prevost Street,
known and designated as Unit No. 5, a
6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface
on a 36 foot roadway.
6. KILPATiICK AVEiZUE: From Hervie Street to Prevost Street,
known and designated as Unit No. 6, a
6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface
on a 36 foot roadway.
7. LIAZ AVENUE: From Bourine Street to Hervie Street,
known and designated as Unit No. 7, a
6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface
on a 36 foot roadway.
8. LIBBEY AVEIP E: From Faron Street to Bourine Street, known
and designated as Unit No. 8, a 6 inch
hot-:::ix asphaltic condrvte surface on a
36 foot roadway.
9. LIBBEY AVEi.UE: From ;,;errick Street to Neville Street,
known and designated as Unit No. 9, a
6 inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface
on a 36 foot roadway.
10. NEVILLE STREET: From Locke Avenue to «lest Rosedale, known
and designated as Unit No. 10, a 6 inch
hot-mix asphaltic concrete surface on a
30 foot roadway.
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY sfCRfTARY
FT. WORTH, TEX.
11. BYERS AVENUE: From Hulen Street east to the
east line of the alley, known
and designated as Unit No. 11,
a 6 inch hot-mix asphaltic
concrete surface on a 36 foot
roadway,
12. ALLEY, BE-MEEN HULEN AND
JESTERN STREET: From Byers Avenue to Bryce
Avenue, DELETED, M & C: C-288,
May 4, 1964.
13. SUTTER STREET: From Calmont Avenue to Birchman
Avenue, known and designated as
Unit No, 13, a 6 inch hot-mix
asphaltic concrete surface on
a 30 foot roadway.
14. DOROTHY LANE: From West 5th Street to West
4th Street, known and designated
as Unit No. 14, a 6 inch hot-mix
asphaltic concrete surface on
a 30 foot roadway.
15. GUILFORD ROAD: From Malvey Avenue to Calmont
Avenue, known and designated as
Unit No. 15, a 6 inch hot-mix
asphaltic concrete surface
on a 30 foot roadway.
The above,together with combined concrete curbs and gutter on proper grade and line where same are not already
so constructed,together with storm drains and other necessary incidentals and appurtenances;all of said improve- .
ments are to be so constructed as and where shown on the plans and in strict accordance with the Plans and
Specifications therefor: and contract has been made and entered into with
General Construction Company
for the making and construction of such improvements on the above said portion of streets,avenues and public
places.
WHEREAS,estimates of the cost of the improvements of each such portion of streets,avenues and public
places were prepared and filed and approved and adopted by the City Council of the City, and a time and place
was fixed for a hearing and the proper notice of the time, place and purpose.of said hearing was given and said
hearing was had and held at the time and place fixed therefor,to-wit, on the day of—_
19 in the Council Chamber in the City Hall in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and at
such hearing the following protests and objections were made,to-wit:
protested that
protested that
_ protested that
protested that
_ _protested that
protested that
__protested that
__--protested that
protested that
___protested that
__ _—protested that
_ protested that
IV.
Where more than one person, firm or corporation owns an interest in any property above described,each
said person, firm or corporation shall be personally liable only for its,her or his pro rata of the total assessment
against such property in proportion as its, his or her respective interest bears to the total ownership of such
property, and its, his or respective interest in such property may be released from the assessment lien upon pay-
ment of such proportionate sum.
V.
The several sums above mentioned and assessed against the said parcels of property, and the owners
thereof, and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent (6�:) per annum, together with reasonable attorney's
fees and costs of collection, if incurred,are hereby declared to be and are made a lien upon the respective parcels
of property �%gainst which the same are assessed, and a personal liability and charge against the real and true
owners of such property, whether such owners be correctly named herein or not, and the said liens shall be and
constitute the first enforceable lien and claim against the property on which such assessments are levied, and
shall be a first and paramount lien thereon, superior to all other liens and claims,except State, County,School
District and City ad valorem taxes.
The sums so assessed against the abutting property and the owners thereof shall be and become due and
payable as follows, to-wit: in five (5) equal installments,due respectively on or before thirty (30) days,one (1),
two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of completion and acceptance of the improvements in the
respective unit, and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become
due and payable in such installments after the date of the completion and acceptance of such respective units,and
shall bear interest from said date at the rate of six per cent (V� ) per annum,payable annually with each install-
ment, except as to the first installment, which shall be due and payable at the maturity thereof,so that upon the
completion and acceptance of the improvements in a particular unit, assessments against the property abutting
upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become due and payable in such installments, and with
interest from the date of such completion and acceptance. Provided, however, that any owner shall have the
right to pay the entire assessment, or any installment thereof, before maturity by payment of principal and
accrued interest, and provided further that if default shall be made in the payment of principal or interest
promptly as the same matures, then the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall,
at the option of said City of Fort Worth,or its assigns,Lie and become inunediatel'y due and payable,and shall be
collectable, together with reasonable attorneys fees and cost of collection, if incurred, PROVIDED, however,
that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works the City of Fort Worth retains the right to
authorize payment of the sums assesed against abutting property upon such completed and accepted unit in not
more than forty-eight (-18) equal regular monthly installments of not less than $9.00 each, the first of such
installments to become due and payable not more than thirty (30) days after the completion and acceptance by
the City of the particular unit. PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby empowered to authorize
payments of said sums of lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director
Of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will
otherwise result;and PROVIDED FURTHER.that such method of payments shall be authorized only in instances
where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and
delivered to the Citv of Fort Worth a lawful, valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract
upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and convening the said abutting property in
trust to secure the payment I)y said owner or owners according to the terms thereof of the sums assessed against
such property.
VI.
If default shall be made in the payment of any assessment, collection thereof shall be enforced either by
the sale of the property by the Assessor and Collector of Taxes of said City as near as possible in the same man-
ner provided for the sale of property for the non-payment of ad valorem taxes, or at the option of the City of
Fort Worth, or its assigns, payment of said sums shall be enforced by suit in any court of competent jurisdic-
tion, or as provided in any mechanic's or materialman's contract as aforesaid, and said City shall exercise all of
its lawful powers to aid in the,enforcement and collection of said assessments.
M O ' Kl
U • •
yto
rl N
M i N
O M 11 O rn �
M N
j
o I v
r� t .
¢ j
K r-1 r1I �D \O
i
H N N N N N N
d f
O O O O O
C%jto
O O O O O
41
i
N
Qyf] N -M N N N N N
pQ
H I O O O O O
Ol O O Opp "'N a O
H
W I N N N
Pa
41
N M N N yi M N
b
a 01
o
O,Ci
SIR
o f I i i I
►e I � i
i +4 E1 �O
� � H
s m I
pp• F U ►� � fr � A. �
r�i rrF W � � � Grti� i P�1 ►•� � � '
r-I N H O O O O G
ri 0 N
h-
{{yy o
Ln LN('� LNCI �Ql
U
O
H
,v O O O o o 0 O O O p oo�l O O O o
00 �` 0 0 LC1 IS10 0 �[+ 0 0 � O
p • • a gy�pp• •N♦ �p • • tp
111IINNNNN
aado w ko ,.o
v► ao �sl t��1
'H.O �9'd.N
tU) � �� �N wC:
N
Apr+ NW] qy�U U ® F, b♦ CF�� �
W ,�� v N d
R �i o 4i - • a -1 ® E
U � m R'ic7o rn fY.r�h �p; c�h � ac7
111O oC; topq UA , n LnoO M
N O O i� N O O N C� O N O O
�Fy E
2 H
�aFH �o {
a o. U~
`n M - ll�
i a ..3 H N cv �NyS N po
U do'" N N N N 0-�
a. i
rLL. S S S S
ISO
" F O N7 U F O Ln LrN tOt, Ln
c�
W
W U Z F O C O O o
Lo a. Ln 9ce.W rN-I rN-I "N-1 rN'I `�c',
w
o C6 �
H H o
F ti -N
H J
.r{
s
r-i
F+
UY CV N r-I
O
CO N O N
O U r�l N -
Fi
n
r~I o -d Da
h' O 41 co O cs
i 4 A o W v c
� u-,
ttl
a
LLM,
z N.
O F
U�
lk C F
Lcl E,
0 0 (D Cl N
0 C)
0
ko
N-1 clu C"l N CQ
C\j u
E4 C)ICD c) 0 c lo a or C) OICD o C)[
1-1 1� (� 1� . COO
F4 GNON 'i cfc�l 0
r--U Cli CD 0 000 C) o 0 0 0
rl N-1 r
E-1
cl,I-0 C) 0 LD C-1 C, 0
c� 3 ci
D
rD r, u 0 C, u rD
ao 0 ;4 Q p a) 0 a v
C5 P, 0 Pri C!$ PJ li)
7D 0 7) �D Z) 7) 00 0 -0 o 7�) 07)
LP N lLl Lc, L(I. I n I Ln tr, LCI L!-1 U
Q
o c C4
.4
d Lt.
kv
wig O O 0 0 0 0 0
U) 0 -
M N C!
U) ZD b4 N-N -)N
U (D w 401
0, cy, m (7, C',
Ow
0 C) 0
1�5 0 0 0
U) J N N N N CJ
cl: -1
U3 w IA
Pr
cl:
0 0 0
w J -- C; o
Lc') 1171 Lf) Lo
to
cl:
jJ LL.
41
c"i
60 rlo
r-q r-i r-i
r-4 ri
1,C) bo c cm
ay cli N N Ci V-1 r-I Nl
co
rl
cli cli N
,E
r
M C,
, Cj 41
a, 11 . cli Si
C-1 LLI 333y Lei
0 "1
-4 0 0 cn�4
4) 0 C�, 0 cc
w co
ri
C\j
Ll i
0 P, K
'D
I�L. ri
P, P4
C)
4
�"1 N
N »
bo
M
M Ol tD
M
1 '
I
( �0 0
w
3 � m m I M M I
Ki M 1
4 .. »
Od tU -P Ea I 00 O O
1 +�C¢h qqH Op pO
C
yyCm5 rl r-I
6q � N I �
� I
y >
i? rP N N �W AW N
O
i
00 00
fi 4P I m al GO
LI
w
p 1 g I 1 g i
LO
O O
� F I
HI 1 i
41 1
0.
w I •'' t
C1 of H U a I i tr U P4 N U 04
i
a
0
m
o
a► w rw
i
i
O 0 D j
1 o `� g j
u, L;
Q N m m
Fi I
= i I
o
ow
N tq O LU II-
0
lC1ko
bo M M
4w 4s. 404.1
o
o 0 0 0
oUIN LC\ U,
to
o� I • 40 4w 4w N e& M
O
O O O O
f` N w O to N • O
to
PL
. rl ri M ri �D
49.
pper��
{� W Fr I'i ti M ti O O
V Ea �U %lO O
�J tD LQ 4w. 4w
kc
O Ey pQp���j • • • • • i
v {4 F
,J
M
fi 41
C I
I N
I I a U
4
� pe a
E-A
A
N fl
Lc-, -t m
r-4 E-1 0 0
0 0
O C) 0 O 0 CD 0
W CV J �,O �-D r",
0
E,
(D ID Q C)10 0 0
(-) 0
rl—H In r---i P--
H
0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 00 0
0 0 0 0
Q C) 0 (D
go
C) C) C)
N C� ci
. 0 3 `1.1 3 c�
q) Fa Fa
0 fr, 0 PC, (b r' 0 ch
_0 00 00 0 7) 7) 7) 7D
K%I Cl H H LCl ISr W Ln Lrl LC Lfl
c:> 0 0 0
C� C�
a.
o
0 0 O (D 0
C�
U) • LL. GIN 0-1 Cyl) cyl�
0W 0 0
a. 0 0 0 C) C3 0 C)
LL.
---f -i- .77
cl]
F5(�, - C\j cli N c"i
LU
PA
v I cc 0 C, 0
0
LU 8
LLI � 9 u Ln Ln Lr-� Lc-1 Ll
a.LU Cl
H 0
LU
O
r-i 0
41 r-I
(\J-
r-q r-q ri rl r-f
C\j N N
r-I r-4 r-I H H
O klo
C\j cli (D cu
(NJ CV rl rrl it
O
.8 1 .8 16 cO .8 41
H r", r— H
C; cli cli 0-)
4- 4>
Ei
4-1 r) 4, fl rn to :A ul
4-
0 E-i 0 O LCl 4- M LC\
ul ti P
C-3 a) Fi
rn :j a) a 117 C�ci 10 $- r-q ) CZ a) cu C) m a r-) m CD
cc -P
o�,o Sam! rl- C;C'J (D
W r
%C)
10A llil� rrl
0 -i cj
Ei Lc� it', 1:1 P!P—. �T4 El rl) EA K) fr Ln
Eq
C) (D C)
0
O ul
t.-) H Od Lf'�
cr) M N
fl,
Ot
LnM 5 0 0 O (D I 0 0 lo
0 OHO C, c 0 o:) P, 0 0 C) C) CD (D
El
o00 o c1 4 L
r-f j
A
(D
CM C"i C\j
H CJ
G.
4
CD lu 2) (P
0i
C4 fr4 0
00 I:rl 0
00 CI 0 C)
00
C)i 773rI H
Z) O G O C3
0
zo
ILI rl) r-I H I-, tD
Cl 0 C) C-)
(D L", 0.
U) I-D m Yj
w CrIl -T
4
C)
0 C.)
cli
C)) Hit H H
LU P) 44
C�
0 C� C! C�
C) Z (Z)
w -1 CMCI\
LU
fjw
-H W
-4 �?,-1
H
Q) -I
H 10
cli
S H
0
H H
F;
E! 0 to
E S
l
CC C)
EA Ei fit ITJI Cr, Ey
si ->,,4-1
.0 01 &V- H 5:3
CD r-- (a c CU
k'; Ln Lr,
Is
N to
y C�
N � ko
., .w ..
Im
N r-i N
4D rl ri Co �p
' .4 M
0 '' 0 0 0
N
raj{ H r1 N M
!
ii i? N M .N 4W
cu
'I i bo w
o
bo fi0 O O O
yy�7 CO O O
P4 H
N H �"'� r-I H b0o j N M
�I 4- N Hl M
(3\ � H rl rl
q R
Et N M N •T 40 •i 4W M
q
f4 !
• � P ! p
F.
O O O O O O 0
U
H N• N• • p
bo .7 O
m O't Co
H rl M .7 •D
O O ( O O O
O
ppqq 0O O O O O
P+ I Pr ! to N I a00 N O
U I L•1 HQ
U �� m i
4W Jo
P4 I
EA LC\
U M EI o f
m
i
� M I
CS
!+ appt.. �+ '� 1q-�4 t 1
H
F 1 0 0 aC) 0 0
0 0 (D 0 0
c; C;
LO 1-0 M, trl V l-O
< C\j CA N cli
E-4 Q (CD) Q 0 (D (D 0 0 <D 0 C) (D QJID C
F4 C�lz� C) C) 0 C) 0 0
C!1-1. % C,
oa
-ID 0 0 1� (D I
j r-I r-i cli -i co FO
:9 A
C, (D C)
ci
0�
rD C)
r-i r-I w 0 CD r-I CD H CD
ID 1p (D
61
ID 0) to
0 0 0 7D 7) 0 (—D 0 0 � 7)
Lc1 11-1 ri In in I[)LC-1
0 P 0
C)
C�
C 0 0 G G O (D
0 0
U)
ttnnwa
O C 0 C) 0 C-) C)
(D 0
lu �
to 1 it C 44 �:, , r-� r--!
P �
C\j (�j cl; cli W cli
D
ed FS
LLI 0
cl: C!
CD C) 0
Lf) LC� Lr) LC'N
to �
ri
4- —1
Q
ci
he 1�0
ri
H
.3
C; Hri
O
5 to
, .0
C)
0
—1
t-Z 41 0 41
C) tu cc -I 'I "t CI-
CD P, 0 n! 0 p, -li 0� !:� 0 Q
0 1 '1 10 H Oil Coll
04 0 cl r-I
F--j 0 -ri
Ok
FA LC', WN FZ Lfl F..I Lf
hi
ti
ti
H (D ;C\i
E En 0
U) 'D
"A cli
i
P,
000
00 000 o [-, C(�
, olo '50
C� 1(D� 0, 1� C�
10
0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 -j-
11�1'
3 3 311-1. 0
(n -1 -0- zt
0 0 . 0
do
cc
-0 p0 00
00
C)
C� C!
C9
C7, C)
_71
cn
cn A rWl i m cyll (1 Q,
acq
C'9L. P.- r- r-
x C',j Cu c"I 011
aad -t
re
t-A
VA LU
tv C! C!
LUU 0 0
Lr-1 Lrl
'-1 0
Fi 4� W
41
VC)
t
1-0 w C)
H r-4 (Ii
C3 C3-
Pi H
U) CD 4�1 0,
C) LU W C), (n C� QO 4-
C, cs
m ko �4 C5 114
0 tt oi ct r,l
Fri 0 0 Lf,
0
C;
z
Lc,
�
�; 1—
N
ON
i I
� j p
P�4 8 O M M
Ol
ri r-1 CV M `
I
4i N p Y! N M
i
N iy Lf; LNCI O N
LC1 LCl N N t1�
O I
• r-d r-1 H
R I N 4& N afar' w w iW
4.
a-�
�q6 9
}� W
N
H O O O O O O O
H
ri ra
p
M r�I F�P4 i N m N O
f
0
ON w
4-
-- -
LC
P,
Fq
M
1 A
aV)
UR
R 04 !4 H
c:) 0 0 0
O O O ol. c,
C)
t— cl,
(D O O > Q- (Dl(-) (D dc� 0010 'D o LD o
-c 0-
r.
41 9
000 :D 0 0 0 0 (D 0 LC'.LC 0 000
I--H Lo t--H w r--
4�7j llf 4- pl'�
CL
4- 3 C�
rD
c-D C-D CD
CD H
M 4) 4) ID
c3 r') fill
PEI
'I In I C) In W� cl,In N CIIJ H Cj 0 0
0
pq
0
rr, r. H
4^
0 0
U)
m.
U)
r4
44 0-� ON cv�
94 W.
�Qw�
0
0
L4 C�j Cli N 'A
LLJ 40 C\j
0 0 0
C-1 ts�
LU In C11 Cli
Lu
O
C)
4- H H
ri
8-H twl
4.
w A r," N tit
-Do
r-I
Cli CA bo Cli
C\j co rl%
cl?
0
ILA
C7 -1 N Cul
CNI
Fi
&4
Fti
Q) Q
L
Er
UJ p
a)
0 In H m Q)
91 0 1; F-D
It
H
co P. r) PA
0
F5
c;
0 z
0 C, 0
Lc-� .mr C) 0
H CA
O C)
1-11,
to H ri LNJ
(D
COO ( (zl 0 0 C3 0 010 0 0 0LC
D s 0
V3
00
0 00 0 O'� 0 0(D 0 (D
r- r-q r-q N iYl N r-- -4
fj
(A.
8
co C1.1
t40
4� R
4- 0 HCOJ CD
_Aj �A r-I CD
r-q C-) r-I H 0 (1) U 1-1
w ci a r-i ✓ G)
r-i C
44 ;>
m al r5 0
p 5
4) 1., 1, .11 r2i CDH Cs
0 114 0 CJ (e) a 0 pf
rc, —r, (D Ll 7p —f) 0 7) (—D
-"
C"l CIO N C\j I!-,.In -:7i, H If-,Lc
0
0 O C) 0 0
cu 0 0
-Ee
U-1 c 0
U) IX
[L. ri D1-0
--wj- 0"
u
C)
OW
w -4
Cj N 0% zt C\j
1-4 (li cli
W
P-,
U)
LU C� C�
w U3 n Ln h0, 0C) 0 0
LCIN
haw
LC&4
H
fit
IV
O o .,I
4 V1 r-I
P4
t Z"j
;,SD CIO
CU4, 10w a Ic Z�o
C)
Q 4� CL 0 CC3
-H
Lf ;J
IV
C ww
E,
H 41
k Pi
rn
P4 f4 (D M\ cc C) -H 1,
rn Ell' E6 Q 'd I,
w r,-, % Pi Lf-�
0 LC, Tr
E;.4 1
t-u
L)Z
w
4-1
(D (D -o VO
0 C7 *
4'q
(D CD I'D ID O ID C. 0 0 0 0
T-- -4 :O r--14 '10 r--ri cJ r-- -4 -4 uo
CL
ttyy
10 0 C) 'D
3"'1 33"J
0 r-i 0 r-4 CD r-4 Uri C H C',1-4
C9
'D 71
f" 72 i
L1 ll�
O
I'D
0
CD
o
cc .4
C\i N N C", N cl�l
0 0
zLU
� xwD. Ln LCN I Lc"
LU
Z
H. c •H r-i
41
� F-
41
ci rl.
r-I r-q
Lf
Fr
u UJ
cu
LC\ M r-4 Lf\
Z,�t C�;-.Lc- Vl r,,,Lc-, Ll"
O00 1m CN
N
s L; W;
4 M �' M
r O O � EO
to to
M ' I ti L a%
M 4
' ' I
I
N M M
N N I O O N
F i H ei O O ri
4- I DO n0 Oo oO w
bq 1_ f` 12 lD �O
p� Og1
*4 !i M ♦4 IW N N M
U '
H Sj O O O O O
� � m Im
pppy - I 4 4 ' .7" ko
¢] ^ M Ni tlw 40 -W N •O
W
w S S O
U
i
PA i
� I
�+ H -H I I
H 1
64
s p'�
�p Ch
�MB71j F
a 12 i E
w i y y cn � i
0 C)
U)
C\j N cli C\'I N a: ci
Ei
rn
(D 0 C) 0 C) C) 0 OT, 0010 0 Ola o 0 r
0 C�
000
0 0 00
cu r-i �o t-- t--r-i 0 r—r-i r—H r--r-j
-r IP,-j 0
0 o 0 (D 0 0 :) a" o CD
60 Nci 0
fq
P'4 0 w, 3 0 (D 3 C) 0
0 :T C\j (D C\., 0 NJ
BOG
CD p • CD rD
u CID, J, ;4 Sr fi
H u C3 r-i CJ r-i Uri
Q ri C5 ai a)
1>
cu
cu vo
C) P-, fe, F� 0 03 (Li C,3 r--" 0
C5
<D,0 0 o -o,-o 7, 7 3 7)
Lcll Ln CJ In LrN LCl to Lf>Ln r-I I-C"Lcl Lf-)Lll J(-N LL"%
0 0 C) C) 0
ce 0.
CIO
CD C!
�C-Y)
w fn cu
C4
cz
LU
P�
9 C�
LU 0 0 0 0 0 C, CD
wl fl n Lfl LC
H 0 .,1
bJ CFll cr,
0
H
cr�
C; H
4D ID 0
ri <1
w 41
V2 H ra
a) a >a H o il 'C', F
1-4 -,4 E-A -r-I 0 .,j 0 .11
�4 F-1 4 �4 "mil .-, 1-4
Q Id
4-0 C,W, b,LC1 0 0--, P-- -H I-
00 r-1 0 G r-i 09 0 r-i
U-
C, \ -H 0 Ln C\j H m Ln CID LC� (9 Lc)
tn. F1 Lcl P-71 LC`.
WMW
U) C) 0 0 c> 0
C,
ca OIA cd cli C"i C,; C\j
rA
0
D"t{l
,q �D 0 C) 0010 --) Olo 0 oln
0 0 C, 0
Ci ci
0 0 0 0 0 00 000 CD 0 0 OF
Hr (D
I-- r—
• r— ) H co H bo r--r-I[o t—H 10 t—-i co r—r-A
z o
rn
CL
IN.
C\t C� O C',
r4
C-D r-)
CD H C,H
•w ci m Q; (�Z In
& ; �4 0 11) k
rl, C. P" :15 0 n', K,1 r _ U-�7 U-)7 U'N 7n 7 71, 7H-)0Ll� 0,7
Ln
0 (D 0 O O 0
J
coo
0 0 0 0
54 0%
(D 0
0 0 0 0 C)
r
tu > to U C N cli cli C"l cli
1-4 LU
th
0 o O 0 0 0 0
LU
w IC) U� Li�
ox LU
r a. LL.
Aj
H 0 rl
4-
0 IZI li PA
q H U
cv -H ro
;�;,
Nd t-- cli cli cli C\j
T�o 011
bo 0
C\j
c�3
10 4 .8
(D Gl
ZD r-I Ln
FI
r(D
H w
19
C,
Fq I
0
CQ H Ll� LC-,(Y CV
C,0 0 0 cd C, CL 0 I
I H
V-1 1,7,
0 0 0 c
U) `: o
En
(y (gyp N �o lfJ li IN O
C� U) I!l (J N CJ CtJ
4
1�
01.7'
0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 G J 0 0 0 O
GOO 00C OC.{I1 00 O C7 .1�O 000 p O1O 000 0 00 O
111tttliw t—,q:iJ ice-rl 4q p
t' rl r-1 U
Tn
Cl.
H
'1 H O r> p Q .J-
. ,-rr,��- C
w e `J $� j N N N F
E
+ E� fa U • :cY)
O rl t-+ Sti Fi H
pF, co ro ra y N at
H r3 O f~ ci "� • "~Ri c�i cif ca cC cA c�
t7G n1 ch z� w �.
Bch
00 00 � o 0
��
H O
Pi
v)
•q"E'" M `w O O IDO o O
Q 0 0 .� o
ej a18Wcwy c� {1 0 0 0 0
t 7
q S.) �r7 � Fn rn60
OC ~ iu
�y a a _. o G i o
U)
m `w
�+ 0.
` w
H (� !t 0G — O O O
1w-• O U• F- O� O L O O p
t �••� M W pq W N °, N C J C�V (�`J pl
N
o p o ( 0
W p u
w
O c4 fl "T
-1 O •,i
Q •rJ
d �ri •r-1 z3
C\l Ol ON Ol U Ol
(�-
O a 61 I r-I r-I rl
O
ca N ci J
H
E
U)
U) fi r-i
N
:-� 1
n' + r +�)
0 s;
O W w E+
Q U c: i' Ea O ,n ,U f4 O)
Fl a f4 rC: �� V O H0 HOD
ri
r-I r+l 4)VJ
y 0 c) y v H 0 r-J
U
Z
O F
U � �
U�
m O
t N N
M Ms M
pp
S M i S N•
0 a LO
ODchi I to I
M C;l
3
H fA S O I O LA LO
Fp41 Ob O O N N
• o NN
O � O �Y
iA Z L I O04
�t
M M M M M M
I
04
r ui
a o O p� ~ S
7 ' N
M N h 04 0 N
N
F4 !i 1-4 N co LO O,
VJ
aR fn � i0 M M M i> M M
H �
z p1 a
hl = p t` S O S S S S O
� p
3 10 N 0� Lr 0 O I 0
1-4C i N N
M M M M M M M
ti m O o O o o f
a
u ' n N r N S
) CO .--i M 1-4 10
a k
c
m a°o S S °m I
a� .� t L
.14
H al
W LO
i
10
I a to
A H � a O a m a I
f 14 F P "4 i fa*7i E-4<
I I'\cli El
r-4 U) g !V
T) 0 tc-\
o
U) '-t cli C"i C,
In 1c) 0
O f-\j
ClJ
Cl 0 C), ("! Ig o C)Lc c) 0
L-1 C) L1 N to,-'o I
lrl cli rll�cli cu Lill C\j r-q
0 r-1
0
z EA F-I -i C\i 0-1
rl-I
CD a.
i-q CD NO o C.0 N 0 0
1- 0 r\j C�
1-4-1 �D , C� 1� r� A '0 ,
0 1,' 0
0. 4 z I z I Z�
:) H .14
(-1 7-1 7 77-1 7l Lr-1 Ln L:-\
N (ld-i r-[-r-q 'A CA
(D 0
Lf-� a
1-4 1
tl'l P-1
�j L"I
0 0 (D c
Ll� L1.1 1�a:Lu Cl-I C"i C\j
En r-' rl) r"
rd In
to
Ow W (D
C!
' fiLU 0
Lf inO
ca
a.
V-1 L ic)
w C\i ci 0
li H. aLn
H 0 -A
1-4
pQ
0
r-4
p"I
r-i
O
rl
cli cli
O
0
rOp SSW..LLJ 29 oq Pi
0
O Ul 0 4� CO 4�
0 c- ;-4 0
0 w GO Cr
CD o
FA
-t or P�
'cp C)l C) H 0
L-N E-I I"
0
c
od p a,V,
Ln o
K; r-i H
,•
r►, I � WN I o
r
I • � li
� N i
� i 0 0
{Nf.� cu
� � I
4c 0 0
N
O +� I O
f
to 0
Ln
h
E+ � 4k* M ih► iIP M !I! M
i
O O O O O
aW O O O O O
rl H N
• 4W !I! NW 4N N N 4w
p a I O o O
M M HOl
0 . Q1 a0
J! �Ili
E-H F+
M I
� I
r4 p i a gal l
O P6 O o I P v f4 U Id. y I
R a .
L(-N E/)
H 0
U) bo
C"i N T
001O O 0 �O 0 (DIO 0 0C
Ln r) .)
L Lr, U Lf-,0 ul LCl
O C\l
K'A _zt r-i Ul ---t -I C5 r " Lin
z
w
a. ff4, l
C\"J. Q\N
* 10 116D (4)
0E-f 0
r-i
0 0 r-i Q 0 H 0 ri 0
ca co S4 cu
C15
H LC', Lc LC,% In
Cl
0 0 0 0 0 (D
cl,
(D
a SUN
0 0
(D
U) ha 1-4
Od En
(D 0 0 0
C! 1ri C�
cli
LU --t 7t
cu
LU 0 40
0
c) C� C�
t� 0 C) 0
LU U is,I u LCI%
IN
tu
ij
Ho
4�
0
3
68
I-Iii lIo j I cIll
elti
4-
ILI H
0 H 0
rl
CO
(D H
Q 0
-i b,
0
Q H o
-j
C)
-:t At,_Llf-I
V N N
OD m N
.-f w w
4W
tL
d
e
t o Lc° C.
Cl
40 ilk,
� C
I 8 0 0 8
LO LO2I
Lo. 0! m
�i
i .z 1
N N M M I N rW -W
t
i
0
g 1
oa ti 4
W
0 7. coA CO 0 0 CO
co co
LO LO O�
iA
H M N a4 M M N a►
H
N i
-� w m 8 0 0
CO
CO CO O� O� co
� !6 Ni m} io► N N itr
0
* ! p 0 O
C�
N 0 0
., --
co
i
H
a
� i � '
Lr"C\i 0
U) C) C)
(n
r-4
0 C 00 0000 Q 000
N-)t1i C9 'D 0 Q .0 IR c3i 0 or 110
Lc�1\1 . W Li'l oj 0 Ll CT 0 r-A L('�W 0
C) H H H r-i
E� Ei
�I Wi
,1 0 0 0
ul cli C\j 01 -14-0
*-%. . 1H, . 0
r z),0 Lf-",D —
q!) C\j C\j 0
Ea
U) I'D
ul
r) 4�
0 C-3 H 0 0 0
r-i 0 C3 r-I 0 H to k H 0
0 r-I r) C)
QD
co CD C-5 U) li H m Q) U.,i
000 — — N I—) ; 0—
c"I m C\j 0 N C�j cli (D 0 cli (D
r-i r-A r-I r-I r-i I'll H CV
N ri H
0 0 0 (D 0
1 1% cd.
rL OL, 0 0 'D C.)
CL SUNc"I
0 0 0 0
cli cli
QC:
(f) ci C\j CM ci Ull
in �r4 cu
LL.
Ocz 00 0 0
tu 0 C) 0 0
CQ
LLI C-n 0
ad C!
914
C! Cw!
0 0 0
N N C\j
LL] r-4 H 4 r-i
aww
LU
x
z
0 (D
4 0
0 0
W r-i
[-I Pr
CV cli
bd
0 0 a r-i ri
H cu r-i
ed CG
r-q cn co
Id H H x
rn P11\ (D
cu H F�
0 41 H Z, H cG H
0
Q co
0 U EQ
c • cv, H
o
cr, Q-)
P: U) t-r)
rn U m
rn o rn
! Cl) N
41% M
LL
j
r Co
i
F
-4 Q) �
M N
!
i
LO 0
1 N M �
as +*
tI
! N N O O N
M
CID Cl) It IVI
CA u {
V� E �pp i M �! N N -i M N
C7 I
>a4
►�4 ' O O LO
W .f1 I N to
O O l-
to IC)
.� .I N
!O M M N -W N M
i
pig 0 pq pip
C� O � CD
10 U
10
0 �8 i 0 J m �
A a i .r Cn
a + # s I 42, 4&
ro
tf) a
(a CA
I
� It b xI !
I '
R b U C3 a
tau
13
% 0
U) C\i ON UN
-T (D
nl
F-i
ri cri CD r—'-C)lo -'00 ltp
-3�'n
P'N 44 r--lr,� t-- • f'N I t—
f�'C'J r-A L(-N cli r-1 cli,t-) cli
c
E I
E,
Ltici) C)
1-4 cj C)
Ol NG? t 0 Va
cd Lcl C)
Ld) cl]
CD CD 4�
0 0 C)
0 (D 6) C!)
CD H " (0 "' 0
ty 40 '
cu d M -d ��3 ar
9
of 'd (a 'D, 't rj,) '.) -d
;a •
.', G) ;- -H
pl 0 0 V2
7 7) i i it A A iA
H rl r-1 C\j cli w N rNJ C\j 1-4
H H
G-N to L(-N
r\j
0" FIN
NFIN
.3 8 CV CVcli
44
F.0 LlzU 0 C) 0 vO
C�
o
N C\j C\j
CD T— -N
9-4 U
FG Cti
W H C\j cli Vo
w H
z
ce w
ri
P 4�
ri -ys C"
4p
a H 91 0 0 11 0
C)
Fi w
E- 0 fa
4� 0 W
E-1
4� 1 W, ,P
- 4� 4�
j in f 4j :J !
C) c" �3
4- VA 11 '�3 1
ch
'j w
T) AD D 0 .
(D
C cc
0
0 U C6 r CG--(D
I(N
Q
0
w �
cn OD
41 OD
N —4
41W M
LL
' g
8 w g
�S Si cv N
N
R 8 g � e 8
cz ol
N'. N r
4► 4► 4► 4i► N !i!
1
14
v "' O O O 8 8
+)
p� LO LO 00 co Cl)
N
!N I 10 10 LO LO
VJ
N 1-4 i
iP iD M �w M M
IpKFF�ffyqq ,d I
= I
O 8 e e l� f
s 8
(31
�ppd N N N
!� 44 4w N 41► 41, 4W 4W
LHW� O
u p O O O O
> I • •
. O O O O O
8 tO to Oif? . 0
v
o m � m
ai
O ` 4 P 4w 4s
An
si a '
� i
a � Q1 � f
10: s
C) 0 0
0 a
In cli O O 0 10 ol(c> 0 0 0 ,0 0 0
Ise v Irl
In 1-)0 ;�oErrs
H r-I[r1r) r-i 411
0rt
LU f
C6 0
8 1 --1
P4
CD C)
41 41
0 q
o U a 0
rn d Id
ri
ul 11 ul
F-4
0 CIO cu C) Cli c" 0 C', 1*11 0
r-4 1-4
0 0
Lc', ul
C11 C�
to 0
cl,
aad CIA)
cv, cd cli N 0
I"') fl) N-) r"
cli
ED 44
(D C)
0
H LLI P) 44
Io0 9 CyO �
cl:
LU
N
r-q ri r-4 H
0
4.�
ri
tU I-q
(Ij CL\l
r-4 0
C\j
rD
CA
w 0
4- 4-
4� 0 41
H 0 a 1.4 0 cl,
a a. 4-
0 ai C3 —C6
CD CD
H
4! 4� 4 r
F1 r
Lc-,
C-)z
City of Fort Worth, Texas W*
Mr. =
Mayor and Council Communication
TE REFERENCE SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PAVING OF 15 LOCATIONS PAGE
D
�3-25-64 NUMBER IN ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, PROJECT NO. I
G-648 097-24000-121 lot
On May 49 19649 M&C C-2889 the City Council awarded the contract for Asso* ent
Paying of 15 Locations in Arlington Heights, Project No. 097-24000-121, and set
May 25, 1964, as the date for the Benefit Hearing. A Neighborhood Hearing was
held April 149 1964, at the Arlington Heights Elementary School, The Project
units and their limits include the following:
ROADWAY
UNIT STREET LIMITS WIDTH R.O.W.
1 Littlepage From Malvey Avenue to Calmont Avenue 30' 601
2 Helmick Avenue From Horne Street to Faron Street 36' 80,
3 Helmick Avenue From Faron Street to Bourine Street 36' 80'
4 Helmick Avenue From Bourine Street to Hervie Street 36' 80,
5 Helmick Avenue From Hervie Street to Prevost Street 36, 80'
6 Kilpatrick Avenue From Hervie Street to Prevost Street 36' 80'
7 Diaz Avenue From Bourine Street to Hervie Street 36' 80,
8 Libbey Avenue From Faron Street to Bourine Street 36, 801
9 Libbey Avenue From Merrick Street to Neville Street 36' 801
10 Neville Street From Locke Street to West Rosedale St. 301 601
11 Byers Avenue From Hulen east to the east line of alley36' 601
12 Alley between Deleted by City Council action on May 4,
Hulen & Western 19649 M&C C-288
13 Sutter Street From Calmont Avenue to Birchman Avenue 309 601
14 Dorothy Lane From W. 5th Street to W. 4th Street 30' 60'
15 Guilford Road From Calmont Avenue to Malvey Avenue 30' 60'
It is recommended that the assessment of five lots on Diaz Avenue, Unit 7, be
adjusted as proposed on page 1 of Attachment "A".
It is the opinion of the Public Works Department that each parcel of property is
benefited in an amount equal to or in excess of the amount recommended for
assessment.
It is recommended that an ordinance be adopted closing the hearing and levying the
assessments as proposed.
JLB:eln
Attached are the following summaries:
Attachmept "A" Resume of the project; OFFICIAL RECORD
Attachment "B" Distribution of cost and assessments; CITY SECRETARY
Result of Postcard Survey;
Attachment "C" Assessment Rolls in alphabetical order. FT. NORTH, TEX.
SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSIT#N BY COUNCIL: PROC ED BY
jJ APPROVED OTHER (DESCRIBE)
Adopted o:dinime No, QQ bnrlft
�
7181 closimlevying "is"ammits CITY SECRETARY
0
/ITYANAGER
lie extended to end of atreet in Unit No.11. DATE
1" �
r� an6 e i e m SC•.TT w s
ei r
/ 4
s• ,N lean
0
4
WEST VE
�g AMoN
CARTER
a' R�yER
\ i
..t
LIRA= �L -
v r It Lin@ ,i r
r_ rHi its
West v �•
F1. Worth l It
y
E T — WEST 1
L E N A
POPE S —
`-- HOME Nile) is J
r 7 �l r
t _ `
m PARK
{T
5 I
r
COUNTRY
iu
R!O G L E A
COUNTRY
L O CA T10A1 M A P
14 SS ISSMZAI T PA VIAA A T 5
L 0 CA TIO AIS A DIIAI� TOA/ T�'
n0)3Z iC WOPkS DZA-VTOPIT
c. V. Ty,[L 1 A IDi,Q[C T UR Nl w. ASsJw) C/-// y IV/X112�
/)/;)U✓£CT /VG. 097— 2 4000—/�_� Ill
A11ACALEM'. 'A'
pag's -1 C f
C 17 Y OF F OR"' W OF?
PUB.LIC WORKS DEPAR',MEN-
ENGINEERTNG DIVISION
ASSESSMEN' PAkli.NG OFFICIAL RECORD
1,5 Lo &-tlons in &,,,li,nq.cn H_Iqh CITY SECRETARY
,
ProJel-t McN, 09-,1-24000-121 FT. WORTH, T
RESUME OF PROTECT
A Nsi-ghborhlood Hearing was conducted bv the Works P,epartmc-h�tt, at. the At�'Ingto,1
Heights Elementary School, oil Ap�rfl la, 1964-,, to'r A-sess,Tien-, pa�qlqq a:, 1,5 Loca� ion,, 1-
Ail ir,gto�r. Height,;, Pzoie--.- 09.-,24000- .L2!. owner participi=7-
of: paving (petitioning, methods and pc'Li,, !e5 of dr-termining assesimerz'.s,,
P"wrpc S,: 0,1:1 hearings, of stree-,�S, and methods c1 parymeni were explained lv,
detaii. and discussed witb, the, 40 p,-epee 2jr�
UNIT LIIJLEPA( Es There we-re t)IDJC-T'10 Stated-:
UNIT 2 through M ICK AJEN:-Lf- There wex,� J objeC7 ior— Mated,
T
UNIT 6,) KILPATR A-CK AVENUE. - There were no obiecticn� stated.
UNIT "? DIAZ AVENUE: the owne-,� of Lots 31 througn 38., Cnambej:lair, Arlington Heights
2rid Filing raised a question core: - nir.q the amoirit cf nis asiessmer�t, A. study of' thi4-
property was :sond ict.ed by the Public Works Department. A large 78-Inch. storm d1ain,
crosses Lots 31, 32 and 33, making ihem acl-eptable for development. The pipe opens at
the east line of Lot 33 into a natural channel with a depth from approximately 20 to
30 feet, making Lots 34 through 38 snallow lots cf 30 to 46 feet in depth with the
only usable portions adjacent to the street, paving. The Public Works Department recom-
mends that the assessment of Lots 34 through 38, Chamberlain Arlington fisights 2nd Filing
be adjusted in, accordance with the standard policy regarding shallow lots, according tc
the following formula Adjusted Rate = Averaqe Depth X Normal Rate, The total amount
Too-,—
of the shallow lot credit on the five Icts Is $458,68. There were no other objections
to the paving cf Diaz Street.
UNIT 8 LIBBEY AVENUE� There were no obje(,tions stated,
UNIT_92._11BBEY AVENUE .-JE There were no obje n ctios stated,
UNIT' 10,, NEVILLE STREET: The owner of Lots 1.9 and 20,, Block M, Chamberlain Arlington
Heights Ist Filing objected to the paving for the reason 'thal he feels the paving will
encourage speeding on Neville by mc,`�crists enroute to ttie East-West Freeway, The
owner- of Lots I and 2. Block 131, 0�iambetll,ain Arlington Heights Ist, Filing is in favor
of the paving, but objected to the amount of the assessmer.A . His assessment, exciud-
inq Credits, is higher trian that of hii rpeignbors be,�ause the property is zoned "C"-
Apaitme--* s, He felt the higher rate tar)fair on tris basis that tnis property is hirb
resid&nce and that It will not be benefitted to a greater extent than that of
whose property is z(, nea `B1 Two-Family Residenria',- The rate per linear
foot for paving for commerciai—v zoned property is $5,86- for residentially z,-,r-ed
property it is $5.40 and for zoned, c.,wex -occupied propet,- y, tre rat*
is $5�63, The owne.- has beet-, granted (,r,,,��dit for ex1iting --,Arb and autter a,1, $`4 .86 pet
lineal foot ard is being assessed for owner-oc. upi ed ccmmeTCI-Iiy Zaned prrape---�.,y
ATTACHMENT '"A"°
Page 2 of 2
The assessment is in compliance with standard assessment pa,-Ang policies, and the
Public Works Department proposes no adjustment in the as=essmer'o No other, objer_t one
were voiced to the paving of Neville Street,
UNIT 11, BYERS STREET-. There were PNo ob,j e-�t ior:.d stated„
UNIT 12, ALLEY BETWEEN_ _HU_LEN AND WESTERN„ BEIWE-EN BYERS AND ERYCE . Deleted by Clt. ,
Council a Ction on May 4, 1964, M &�C Number C-288,.���4�v��
UNIT I SUTTER STREET,, There were, no ob.je.-t,lons stated,
UNIT 14 DOROTHY_IANE Thers were: no obje� tion-s :;`.,aced,
UNIT 15, GUILFORD ROAD. There were nc onje:tlo!�s stated,
Atta chment "B'",
Page 1 of 16 L5 LOCATIONS IN &RLTNGTON HEIGHTS,
----
PROJECT No. Q�7+i-24 121 PER
EXCIXTDING UNIT No. 12-ALLEY "DELFT®� CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 1000974,,00
ENGINEERING .........................................................................................................I.... 102097.40
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................f III Q OTIo 40 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 9#3420 5 86.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 10.5250 0 14,0
TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................10986705 200,10
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................= 61,327.05 55.2
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 99,57e2.50 8.6
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 70,899.55 63.8
LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 179375042 15.6
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 539524.13 48o2
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE..................................................I........................ ..............5 579547.27 5198
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 209867.5 50398.5
PER CENT 100 49.7
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 162 81
PER CENT 100 50 THE CUMULATIVE RESULTS
OF THE POSTCARD SURVEY'
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 137 77 ARE AVAILABLE UPON
PER CENT 100 56.2 REQUEST.
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 89 68
PER CENT 100 76.4
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE d4q- 9
PER CENT 100 1808
OFFICIAL RECORD
CITY SECRETARY
FT. WORTH, TEX.
Attachment " "
Page 2 of 16
UNIT 1-LITTLEPAGE STREET
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 4,003.00
ENGINEERING ........................................... ..._ .................................,................ ..... 400.30
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST........... ............................................................................................. ....$ 4,403-30 1010.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE ........................ .. 500.0 100.
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE........................... -"-
TOTAL FOOTAGE._.......................... 500.0 10-10.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT................................................. ..$ 2,930.00 66.5
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.. .... -0-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED... .. ................................................ ............... ....,$ 28930.U0 66.5
LESS CREDITS GRANTED.......... ............. .................. ..... ................. ....._.. ...... . 943.00 21,1+
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT.... .... ...... ........................... ........._......._.. ...... ... ...........I........ .__ 1,987.00
45.1
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE. ....................._ .... .._..........__........................ ........................E 2,416.30 54.9
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 500.0 500.0 375.0 125.0
PER CENT 100 100 75 w5
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 4 3 1
PER CENT 100 100 75 �5
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 4 3 1
PER CENT 100 '1 00 7 5 2�
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 4 3
PER CENT 100 100 '75 25
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE -0- --0-• --0--
PER CENT
Attachment "B"
Page 3 of 16
UNIT No. 2 HELMICK AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 90198.00
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 919.80
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s 109117.80 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 700.0 70.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 300.0 30.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................19 D"V 0 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................5 49760,00 47.0
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.........................I.......................... 29040,00 20.2
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 698000 00 67.2
LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1303.94 12.9
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 5o496&06 54.3
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................5 49621.74 45.7
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1000.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 550.0
PER CENT 100 30 25 20 55
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 20 6 5 4 11
PER CENT 100 30 25 20 55
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 11 6 5 4 2
PER CENT 100 54,5 45.5 36.4 18.1
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE-i 8 6 5 3 —0—
PER CENT 100 75 62.5 37.5 —D—
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 —0e —0— 1 2
PER CENT 100 —0e -0— 33.3 66.7
Attachment "B"
Page 4 of 16
UNIT NO. 3—HEl LICK AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE...........................................................................................................5 9,205,00
ENGINEERING ........ ................................................. ............................. ................. 920.50
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................$ 10,125.50 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1.9000.0 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE —0
TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ................................... 1,000.0 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 60$00.(DO 67,2
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT........................................... -0- -O-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED... .... ............._.......................................................... ..._$ 60800.00 67,2
LESS CREDITS GRANTED..................................................................................I............ lo600„O9 15.8
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................... .......... 50200.00 51.4
.................................................................................
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................... .........................i 4,925 9 50 48.6
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,000 400 250 750 -0T
PER CENT 100 40 25 75
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 14 6 3 u -0-
PER CENT 100 42.9 21.4 78.6
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 12 5 3 9 -0-
PER CENT 100 41.7 25 75
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE'i 5 5 3 2 -0-
PER CENT 100 100 60 40
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 7 -0- -0- 7 -0-
PER CENT 100 100
Attachment "B"
Page 5 of 16
UNIT NO. 4-HELTICK AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................5 g,354"00
*.,(��.�r
ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................ 938$q�
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 10,321.30 1.00.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,000 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. -0^
TOTAL FOOTAGE....... ................,... ............. 1,OOO 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 6,800,00 65.9
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT............................................ ...... -0-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.......................................................................................S6p800.00 65.9
LESS CREDITS GRANTED............................................................................................... 1$600e00 15.5
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT........................................................... ......... 5,200.00 50.4
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE................................ ........................ .........................i 5 J121.30 49.6
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,000 200 100 850 50
PER CENT 100 20 10 85 5
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 1-4 3 2 11 1
PER CENT 100 21.4 14.3 78.6 7.1
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 11 3 2 8 1
PER CENT 100 27.3 18.2 72.8 9
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE'i 4 2 1 3
PER CENT 100 50 25 75 -0-
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 7 1 1 5 1
PER CENT 100 14.3 14.3 71.4 14.3
Attachment "B"
Page 6 of 16
UNIT No. 5 HELMICK AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................_ @fl255,flO
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................: $25.50
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................ 99060050 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 700.O 70.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 300.0 30.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE..........................................1 F 000.0 10010
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................= 49760.00 52.4
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 29040.00 22.5
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................= 60800.00 74.9
LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 10285.00 14.2
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 59515.00 60.7
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................I; 39565.50 39.3
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1000.0 200.0 250.0 725.0 25.0
PER CENT 100 20.0 25 72.5 2.5
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 17 3 3 13 1
PER CENT 100 17.6 17.6 76.5 5.9
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 13 3 3 9 1
PER CENT 100 23.1 23.1 69.2 7.7
OWNERS LIVING ON STREES 7 3 3 4 `0-
PER CENT 100 42.9 42.9 57.1 -D-
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 6 -0- -0- 5 1
PER CENT 100 -0- -0- 83.3 16.7
Attachment "B"
Page 7 of 16
UNIT 140. 6-KILPATRICK AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE............................................................................................................$11,125000
ENGINEERING ............................... .............................................................................. 1o112.50
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................$12 s 237.50 1 00.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 800.0 80.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 200.0 20.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................11000.0 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................E 5,440g00 44,5
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 1 ,9360000 11.1
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.................. ........................................................... ...... 6,800.00 55.6
LESSCREDITS GRANTED.........................................................................I...................... 1,334,88 10.9
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 5,465.12 44.7
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE............................................................................ ..........................E 6..772.38 55.3
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1 f OOO 450 1.50 800 50
PER CENT 100 45 15 80 5
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 1.9 9 4 14 1
PER CENT 100 47.4 21.1 73.7 5.2
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 17 9 4 12 1
PER CENT 100 52.9 23.5 70.6 5.9
OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1.3 9 3 9 1
PER CENT 100 69.2 23.1 69.2 7.7
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 -0- 1 3 -0-
PER CENT 100 25 75
Attachment "B"
Page 8 of 16
UNIT No. 7 DIAZ AVENUE PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE......................................................................................................... .s 119553.00
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 1,155.30
ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s 12P708.30 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 800.0 80.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 2Q00 0 20.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE...........................................19000.0 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 5t440.00 42.8
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 1,360.00 10.7
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 6,800.00 53.5
LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 19607.22 12.6
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 59192.78 40.9
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................s 7,515.52 59.1
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1000.0 7".0 350.0 650.0 -0-
PER CENT 100 74.6 35.0 65.0 -G-
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 17 14 8 9 -0-
PER CENT 100 82.4 47.1 52.9 -0-
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 14 12 6 8 -0-
PER CENT 100 85.7 42.9 57.1 -D-
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE"i 10 10 5 5 -0-
PER CENT 100 100 50 50 -D-
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 2 1 3 -0-
PER CENT 100 50 25 75 -0-
Attachment "B"
Page 9 of 16
UNIT NO. 8-LIBBEY AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE........................................................................................ ..... ......$9,588.00
ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 958.80
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................E 10,54i.6.80 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 1,000.0 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.. ..... ..................... ��-
TOTAL FOOTAGE....... .................................. 1,000.00 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 6,800.00 64.5
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT..._.............................................. -0-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED........ . .. ..........................................................................$6y 800.00 64.5
LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 1S 678.12 15.9
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT.......... .................................................................................... ................I.......__1. 5,121.88 48.6
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.. .................... .. .................... ..........,................................ ........E 5,424.92 5L .4
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 1,000 650 400 600 -0-=
PER CENT 100 65 40 6o
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 19 13 8 11 --0-
PER CENT 100 68.4 42.1 57.9
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 18 12 7 1u -0-
PER CENT 100 66.7 38.9 61.1
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE) 15 12 7 8 -0-
PER CENT 100 80 46.7 53.3
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 3 -0-- `0-^ 3 -0-
PER CENT 100 100
Attachment "B"
Page 10 of 16
UNIT NO. 9—LIBBEY AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE.............. ..........................................................................................$12,306 e 00
ENGINEERING ........................................................................,................................... 1.02,,o. ISO ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................. ............................................................................................IL39516o60 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................. 1800060 100.0
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. ®0W
TOTAL FOOTAGE.............................._............ 1.,000eO 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT................................. ....................E 6,800000 5002
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.... ....................................... ....... mO"
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.._....................................................................................,.$ 6,800.00 50.2
LESSCREDITS GRANTED...................................................._............................,............. 119600.00 11.8
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT............... ................................................................. ........ ...................... ..... 5,200.00 38.4
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................... ...................... .........................._............,..........$ $9336.60 61.6
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 19 000 600 600 300 100
PER CENT 100 60 60 30 10
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 19 12 12 5 2
PER CENT 1.00 63.2 6.3.2 26.3 10.5
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 18 12 12 4, 2
PER CENT 100 66.7 66.7 22.2 ll,l
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE'i 10 8 1 �0®
l00 10 9C 1:0
PER CENT OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 8 4 33 2
PER CENT _�•G0 50 37.5 37.5 25
Attachment "B"
Page 11 of 16
UNIT NO. 10-NEVILLE STREET
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE........................................................................................................$ 3.803.00
ENGINEERING .............................. ...................................................... ...................._• 380.30
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST......._..._.................__...................................................,........................5,C ,M3.30 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.............. -- .375.0 !r7
5
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.....................I........ 125.0 25
TOTAL FOOTAGE.. .... .................................. 500.0 100
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT............................... ....................$ 2,197.50 52.5
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT......... ................................. ...... 732.50 17.5
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..... ... .........................................................,...................$29 930.00 70
LESS CREDITS GRANTED.... ...,.._............................................,.............,..................... 923.75 22.1
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT........... ........................................................................ ......_.......... ............... .. 2„006.25 Llg
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................ ....................... ...... _...,.$29177.05 52
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 500 250 250 "0— 250
PER CENT 100 50 50 50
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 2 2 ._0® 2
PER CENT 100 50 50 50
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 2 2 ®0- 2
PER CENT 100 50 50 50
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE_i 3 2 2 "0` 1
PER CENT 100 66.7 66.7 33.3
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 "0`-• ---0m "0" 3
PER CENT s'00 100
Attachment "B"
Page 12 of 16
UNIT No. 11 BYERS AVENUE
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 2#760.50
ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 276.05
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 39036.,�5 100.0
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE -0-
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 300.0 100.0
TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 300.0 100.0
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................IF -�
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 29040.00 67.2
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 29 040. 00 67.2
LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 548.50 18.1
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 19491.50 49.1
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE..................................................... .......$ 19545.05 50.9
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 300.0 150.0 150.0 50.0 100.0
PER CENT 100 50 50 16.7 33.3
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 1 1 1 2
PER CENT 100 25 25 25 50
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 1 1 1 2
PER CENT 100 25 25 25 50
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE"i 3
PER CENT 100 -0- -0- 33.3 66.7
1 1 1 -0- -D-
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 100 100 100 -0- -0-
PER CENT
"B"Attachment
Page 14 of 16
UNIT NO. 13-5UTTER STREET
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE........................................................................................................$ 30004.75
ENGINEERING ....... ................................................................................................. 380,47
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...............................................................................................................$ 4,185.22 100
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 480 100
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.....................I....... -0-
TOTAL FOOTAGE. ..., .......... .. .... .. 480 100
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT..... ..................... ............ ....$ 2981.2.80 6702.
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT... ..... ............................ . ...._ -00
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.. .. ........ ............... . __........... .._.$ 29$2.2ag0 67.2
LESS CREDITS GRANTED.... ....,......._.... ...................... 918.80 22.0
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT..._..... ............................................................... . .. .... ..................... .. ... 1y894c00 45e2
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.. ..,._............... .._........... .. ....................... ..,........... ., .. ..$ 28291022 54.8
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 480 240 240 120 120
PER CENT 100 50 50 25 25
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 2 2 1, 1
PER CENT 100 50 50 25 25
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 2 2 i 1
PER CENT -&'00 50 50 25 25
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE'i 3 2 2 1. -Om
PER CENT 100 66.7 66-7 33.3
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 -0- ""0_ m0u
PER CENT 100 1013
Attachment "B"
Page 15 of 16
UNIT 14-DOROTHY LAINE
PER
CENT
CONTRACT PRICE,..._.......... ..........................................................................................$3,631075
ENGINEERING .............................. .............................................................................. 363.18
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................._...................... - 3,994-93 1.00
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 487.5 100
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE............................. -OW
TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ..................__........... 487.5 100
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT...,...,.__.........................................5 2.,856.75 71.5
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.__... .._.....,_.................__..... -0-
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED. _ . .... . .,............................._._....... ............ _...5 22856.75 7105
LESS CREDITS GRANTED.._.........................................._.................................._............ 797.21 20
TOTALNET ASSESSMENT........._...................................................................................... .....,...................._ . 2..9059-54 51.e5
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......................._......................_ _...................................................$ 1 ,935 o39 48-5
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 43 0 487 0 5 369 0 5 i.1 g o
PER CENT 1-cl 100 75o8 24.,2
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 4 3 0
PER CENT 1.00 100 75 25
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 4 3 -0-
PER CENT 100 100 75 25
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE) 3 3 3 -0- -0-
PER CENT 1.'00 100 1012.
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 1• -0- 1 `0w
PER CENT 100 100
Y
Attachment "B"
Page 16 of 16
UNIT NO, 15—GUILFORD ROAD
PER
CENT
CONTRACTPRICE.. ............................................................................ .............. .s 29350000
ENGINEERING ........_..............................................._.. ............................................. 235.80
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...... ........................................................................... ................. ..........s 2959.3-80 1.00
RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 500 100
COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE. ........................... —0—
TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ................... ........... 500 100
RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT...................... ...............................$2'993000O 112.9
COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.... ... ..... __ `" "...... ................ ...... —00`�.. . .
GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED.......... .......... ._......................................_............,...._ ... s 29 7 J0o00 1.122.9
LESS CREDITS GRANTED........................._...........................,......................................_. 19235-00 47.6
TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT........ ........ ........................................................., ...... ......... ............._.. 19 695-00 65.3
NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE. ............... . _ . _..........._.................. ... ....,....... .......$ 898.80 34.7
SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY
ORIGINAL FOR NO OBJECTION AGAINST
TOTAL PETITION PAVING SUBMITTED PAVING
NO. OF FRONT FEET 500 2150 375 125 —01-
PER CENT 1.00 50 75 25
PARCELS OF PROPERTY 4 2 3 i —0—
PER CENT 100 50 75 25
NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 9 3 1 —0—
PER CENT 100 5C 7.5 25
OWNERS LIVING ON STREE'i
3 <^ ', —0—
PER CENT 100, 66.7 66.71 33.3
OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1. 1. —C— —0—
PER CENT -C,C IC,C.