Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5550 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVID- ING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF SPRINGER AVENUE ANTI PORTIONS OF SUNDRY OTHER STREETS, AVENUES AND PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS; LETTING CONTRACT TO WORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE MAKING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBT. EDNESS THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESS. MENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS THEREOF FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CER. TIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE CITY TO PREPARE ESTIMATES;DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSE- QUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENT ARE AND SHALL BE PURSUANT TO THE ACT OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE FORTIETH LEG- ISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, CHAPTER 106, COMMONLY KNOWN AS ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL STATUTES; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDI- NANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Public Works Director for the City of Fort Worth,Texas, has prepared Plans and Speci- fications for the improvements of the hereinafter described portions of streets,avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and same having been examined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, and found to be in all matters and things proper, NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, THAT: I. The hereinafter described Plans and Specifications are hereby approved and adopted. II. There exists a public necessity for the improvement of the hereinafter described portions of streets, av- enues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, to-wit: 1. SPRINGER AVENUE: From the north line of White Oak Lane to the north line of Ester Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 1, Project No. 097-24000-144. 2. CHESTNUT AVENUE: From 2509 north of N.W. 30th Street to the south line of N.W. 31st Street, known and designated as Unit No. 2, Project No. 097-24000-144. 3. LAGONDA AVENUE: From the north line of Park Street to the northerly line of 19th Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3, Project No. 097-24000-144. 4. ROBIN STREET: From the north line of Lagonda Avenue to the north line of Nabers Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4, Project No. 097-24000-144. 5. NINETEENTH: From the east line of N.W. 18th Street to the west line of Lagonda Avenue, known and designated as Unit No. 5, Project No. 097-24000-144. 6. LAGONDA AVENUE: From the north line of N.W. 19th Street to the north line of Nabers Street, known and designated as Unit No. 6, Project No. 097-24000-144. 7. CHESSER BOYER ROAD: From the east line of Sylvania Avenue to the west line of Tom Ellen Street, known and designated as Unit No. 7, Project No. 097-24000-144. 8. MAURICE STREET: From the west line of Sylvania Park Drive to the viest line of West Beach Street, known and designated as Unit No. 8, Project No. 097-24000-144. 9. l7EST BEACH STREET From the north line of Maurice Street (to the west) to the south line of Maurice Street (to the east), known and designated as Unit No. 9, Project No. 097-24000-144. 10. MAURICE STREET: From the east line of Vlest Beach Street to the east line of Harper Street, known and designated as Unit No. 10, Project No. 097- 24000-144. 11. HARPER STREET: From the south line of Maurice Street to the north line of Service Road Highway 121, known and designated as Unit 11, Project No. 097-24000-144. III Each of the above described portions of streets, avenues and public places in the City of Fort Worth, Texas,shall be improved by raising,grading,and filling same and by constructing thereon the following,to-wit: 1. SPRINGER AVENUE From the north line of White Oak Lane to-the-north line of Ester Drive, known and designated as Unit No. 1, ' `• Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 301 roadway. 2. CHESTNUT AVENUE: From 2500 north of N.W. 30th Street to the south line of N.W3lst Street, known and designated as Unit No. 2, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 300 roadway. 3. IAGONDA AVENUE: From the north line of Park Street to the northerly line of 19th Street, known and designated as Unit No. 3, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 309 roadway. 4. ROBIN STREET: From the north line of Lagonda Avenue to the north line of Nabers Street, known and designated as Unit No. 4, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 300 roadway. 5. NINETEENTH: From the east line of N.W. 18th Street to the west line of Lagbnda Avenue, known and designated as Unit No. 5, Project No._097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 26' roadway. 6. LAGONDA AVENUE: From the north line of N.W. 19th Street to the north line of Nabers Street, known and designated as Unit No. 6, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 36' roadway. 7. CHESSER BOYER ROAD: From the east line of Sylvania Avenue to the west line of Tom Ellen Streeti known and designated as Unit No. 7, Project No. 097-24000-244, a 7-inch reinforced concrete pavement on a 40' roadway. 8. MAURICE STREET: From the west line of Sylvania Park Drive to the west line of West Beach Street, known and designated as Unit No. 8, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch Hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 301 roadway. 9. WEST BEACH STREET: From the north line of Maurice Street (to the west) to the south line of Maurice Street (to the east), known and designated as Unit No. 9, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30' roadway. 10. MAURICE STREET: From the east line of West Beach Street to the east line of Harper Street, known and designated as Unit No. 10, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch Hot-mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 302 roadway. 11. HARPER STREET: From the south line of Maurice Street to.the north line of Service Road Highway 121, known and designated as Unit No. 11, Project No. 097-24000-144, a 6-inch hot- mix asphaltic concrete pavement on a 30' roadway. The above,together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurten- ances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and Specifications therefor. IV. The cost of said improvements as herein defined shall be paid for as follows, to-wit: A. The property abutting on that portion of the street, avenue or public place and the real and_true owners thereof shall pay all of the cost of curbs and gutters in front of their property and not exceeding nine- tenths (9/10ths) of the estimated cost of the remainder of such improvements. B. The City of Fort Worth shall pay all of the remainder of the cost of said improvements after deduct- ing the amounts herein specified to be paid by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof as set out in subsection A. The amounts payable by the abutting properties and the real and true owners thereof shall be assessed against such properties and the real and true owners thereof and shall constitute a first and prior lien upon such properties and a personal liability of the real and true owners thereof, and shall be payable,to-wit: When the improvements are completed and accepted by the City on a particular unit,the sums assessed against property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall be and become payable in five (5) equal installments, due respectively on or before thirty (30) days, and one (1), two (2), three (3), and four (4) years from the date of such completion and acceptance,and the assessments against the property abutting upon the remaining units shall be and become due and payable in such installments after the date of completion and acceptance of such respective unit.The entire amount assessed against the particular parcels of property shall bear interest from the date of such completion and acceptance of the improvements on the unit upon which the particular property abuts at the rate of six (6%) per cent per annum,payable annually except as to interest on the first installment,which shall be due and payable on the date said installment matures, provided that any owner shall have the right to pay any and all of such installment at any time before maturity by paying princi- pal with interest accrued to the date of payment,and further provided if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as.the same matures, then at the option of the City of Fort Worth or its assigns,the entire amount of the assessment upon which such default is made shall be and become immediately due and payable; but it is specifically provided that no assessment shall in any case be made against any property or any owner thereof in excess of the special benefits to property in the enhanced value thereof by means of said improvements in the unit upon which the particular property abuts, as ascertained at the hearing provided by the law in force in the City, nor shall any assessment be made in any case until after notice of hearing as pro- vided by law. Said assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of a special assessment which shall be executed.in the name of the City of Fort Worth, PROVIDED, however, that acting through its duly authorized Director of Public Works, the City of Fort Worth retaining the right to authorize payment of the sums assessed against abutting property upon such com- pleted and accepted unit in not more than-forty-eight equal regular monthly installments of not less than$9.00 each,the first of such installments to become due and payable not more than 30 days after the completion and acceptance by the City of the particular unit, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the City Attorney is hereby em- powered to authorize payments of said sums in lesser installments and/or over a longer period of time in cases in which the Director of Public Works has previously determined that an extreme financial hardship upon the property owner will otherwise result; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that such method of payment shall be authorized only in instances where the owner or owners of property abutting upon such completed and accepted unit shall have executed and delivered to the City of Fort Worth a lawful,valid and binding note and mechanic's and materialman's contract upon forms supplied by the City granting a mechanic's lien upon and conveying the said abutting property in trust to secure the payment by said owner or owners according to the terms there- of of the sums assessed against such property. The assessments against the respective lots and parcels of property and the owners thereof shall be evidenced by certificates of special assessment, which shall be executed in the name of the City by the Mayor of said City and the City Secretary shall attest the same and impress the corporate seal of the City thereon. and which may have attached thereto coupons in evidence of the several installments, or in evidence of any of the installments in which the assessment is payable, which certificates shall be issued to the City of Fort Worth, shall recite the terms and time of payment, the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, and the name of the owners, as far as known, and shall contain such other recitals as may be pertin- ent thereto, and shall further recite substantially that all proceedings with reference to the making of such improvements have been regularly had in compliance with law, and that all prerequisites to the fixing of the assessment lien against the property described in said certificates and the personal liability of the owners there- of, have been regularly had, done and performed, and such recitals shall be prima facia evidence of the matters so recited, and no further proof shall be required in any court, and the said certificates shall provide substan- tially that if default be made in the payment of any installment promptly as the same matures, then, at the option of the City of Fort Worth, or its assigns, the entire amount of the assessment shall be and become immediately due and payable, together wtih reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection, if incurred, all of which, as well as the principal and interest on the assessment, shall be a first and prior lien against the property, superior to all other liens and claims except State,County,School District,and City ad valorem taxes. No error or mistake in naming any owner or in describing any property or in any other matter or thing, shall invalidate anv assessment or anv certificate issued in evidence thereof, and the omission of improvements on any particular unit or in front of any property exempt by law from the lien of special assessment for street improvements shall not invalidate any assessment levied. The certificates referred to need not contain recitals in exactly the words above provided for, but the substance thereof shall suffice, and they may contain other and additional recitals pertinent thereto. V1. Bids having been advertised for as required by Article 1105b of the revised Civil Statutes of Texas, and the bid of WORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY _ , having been found to be the lowest and best bid for the making and construction of said improvements,the contract therefore is hereby awarded to WORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , at and for the prices stated in the Proposal of said company and as reported and recommended by the Public Works Department, which said report and recom- mendation is on file with the City, the City Manager, and City Secretary are hereby directed to execute the said contract in the name of the City of Fort Worth,Texas, and to impress the corporate seal of the City thereon, the said contract embracing, among other things,the prices for the work. VII. To provide for the payment of the indebtedness incurred by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, by said contract, there is hereby appropriated out of available funds and current revenues of the City, an amount sufficient to pay said indebtedness so incurred. VIII. The improvements provided for herein shall be made and constructed, notice given, hearing held and assessment levied and all proceedings taken and had in accordance with and under the terms of the powers and provisions of Chapter 106 of the Acts of the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, now shown as Article 1105b of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, which law has been adopted as an amend- ment to and made a part of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas,and under which law these proceedings are taken and had. I X. Each unit above described shall be and constitute it separate and independent unit of improvement and the assessments herein provided for shall be made for the improvements in each unit according to the cost of the improvements in that unit and according to the benefits arising from the improvements in that unit. F X. In making assessments, if the name of the owner be unknown, it shall be sufficient to so state the fact, and if any property be owned by an estate or by any firm or corporation, it shall be sufficient to so state, and it shall not be necessary to give the correct name of the owner, but the real and true owners of the property mentioned shall be liable and the assessments against the property shall be valid. XL The Director of Public Works of the City of Fort Worth, Texas, be and he is hereby, ordered and directed to file with the City Council, estimates of the cost of such improvements in each unit,in accordance with the terms of the powers and provisions of the Charter of the City of Fort Worth,Texas. XII. The City Secretary is directed to prepare, sign and file with the County Clerk of Tarrant County,Texas, a notice in accordance with the provisions of the Act passed at the Fifth Called Session of the Forty-first Legislature of the State of Texas, and shown as Chapter 21 of the Acts of said Session of the Legislature,said Act having been passed in the year 1930,and now shown as Article 1220a of Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. XIII. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. XIV. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after —the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ._ __ DAY OF APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney ?t-. b ;n-xtiDe! City of Fort Worth Texas �j • �" k� Mayor and Council Communication DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PAVING AT 11 LOCATION PAGE NUMBER C-685 ON THE NORTH SIDE, PROJECT NO. 1of _3 4/11/66 104-2 00-14 Council action on the project described below is requested: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Nature of Work: Assessment Paving at 11 Locations on the North Side, as follows: ROADWAY UNIT STREET LIMITS WIDTH R.O.W. 1 Springer Avenue White Oak Lane to Ester Drive 30 feet 50 feet 2 Chestnut Avenue N.W. 31st Street to South 250 30 feet 60 feet feet 3 Lagonda Avenue Park Street to N.W. 19th St. 30 feet 80 feet 4 Robin Street Lagonda Avenue to Nabers St. 30 feet 50 feet 5 Nineteenth Street N.W. 18th Street to Lagonda 26 feet 40 feet Avenue 6 Lagonda Avenue N.W. 19th Street to Nabers St. 36 feet 60 feet 7 Chesser Boyer Road Sylvania Avenue to Tom Ellen 40 feet 60 feet Street 8 Maurice Street Sylvania Park Drive to West 30 feet 60 feet Beach Street 9 W. Beach Street Maurice Street to the west to 30 feet 70 feet Maurice Street to the east 10 Maurice Street West Beach Street to Harper 30 feet 50 feet Street 11 Harper Street Maurice Street to Service 30 feet 50 feet Road, Highway 121 Petitions have been received to pave the above streets, except for the following: 1) Chesse oad, Unit 7 : This unit is included in the 1965 Capital Improvement Program (A-189) and the 1966 (If��,ORD Capital Improvement Program (Page 6). The cirr sF�R� improvement will link existing paving with Sylvania Ave'.., provide paved access to the j N�pjy N. Riverside Estates Add. and serve an r area of active industrial development. Ad- ditional justification is included in At- tachment "A". 2) Maurice, W. Beach and Harper Streets, Units 8 to 11: These units are included in the 1966 Capi- tal Improvement Program (Page 6). The pav- ing was requested by an adjacent property owner, Lubrication Engineers, Inc., to service new construction and provide traf- fic circulation in the area. A letter of request, maps and other information is at- tached. SUBMISSION OF BIDS Bidder. . Amount Bid Working Days Worth Construction Company $109,928.45 120 Texas Bitulithic Company 120,089.15 120 r DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PAVING AT 11 LOCATIONS PAGE 4-11-66 NUMBER C-685 ON THE NORTH SIDE, PROJECT NO. 2 3 t 4-2 0- 44 of R. W. Gibbins, Inc. $122,707.50 120 General Construction Company $123s626:30 120 Glade Construction Company 132,075.00 120 W. E. Brittain, Inc. 135,965.95 120 It is necessary that a storm drain system be constructed in conjunction with the proposed assessment paving of Springer AveAue, Unit 1, known as the Westside Acres Addition Storm Drain from Isbell Road to Springer Avenue, Project 097-28000-186. Bids were received for the drainage improvements as follows: BIDDER AMOUNT BID WORKING DAYS Worth Construction Company $11,470.72 30 Lewis and Lewis General Contractors 12,315.00 30 E. H. Shaw, contractor 13,.888.00 OfFICIAL RECORD 30 Cunningham and Tibbetts 13,946.00 30 CITY SECRETARY Glade Construction Company 15,699.00 30 PROJECT COST AND JINANCING FT. WORTH, TEX. Based on the low bid, approximately $65,125.06 will be assessed against abutting property owners. The cost to the City-at-large will be approximately $55,796.24 for assessment paving and $12,000.00 for storm drainage, including engineering and miscellaneous expenses. RECOMMENDATIONS ' 1) That the following bond fund transfers be approved: AMOUNT FROM TO PURPOSE $65 125.06 Revolving Fund 11 Locations - North Property owners' Side 042-10424-144 portion of construction cost $55,796.24 Unspecified 11 Locations - North City's portion of 104-24000-901 Side 104-24000-144 construction and engineering cost $12,000.00 Unspecified Westside Acres Storm City's portion of 097-28000-901 Drain 097-28000-186 construction, engineering, and miscellaneous expenses for storm drain 2) That an ordinance be adopted: a. Declaring the necessity for and ordering the improvements; b. Making provisions for levying of assessments; c. Ordering the Public Works Department to prepare estimates of costs and amounts proposed to be assessed; d,% Awarding the Contract to Worth Construction Company on its low bid of $109,928.45; and DATE REFERENCE SUBJECT: ASSESSKENT PAVING AT 11 LOCATIONS PAGE 4-11-66 C-685 NUMBER ON THE NORTH SIDE, PROJECT NO. 3 3 • 104-24000-144 or e. baking appropriations to cover the indebtedness thereby incurred for improvements to the project named above. 3) That an ordinance be adopted: a. Approving the estimates of cost and amounts proposed to be assessed; and b. Setting April 25, 1966 as the date of the Benefit Hearing. 4) That the contract for construction of the Westside Acres Storm Drain be awarded to Worth Construction Company on its low bid of $11,470.72. PFR:eln The following summaries are attached: "A" - Resume of the project "B" - Distribution of cost and assessments, and results of Post Card Survey "C" - Assessment Rolls in alphabetical order till SE�R��pRy .I WI-- IM SUBMITTED BY: DISPOSITION BY COUNCIL: ���F/1'/''E APPROVED [�OTHER (DESCRIBE) a/. �j /Jj� CLr�� CITY SECRETARY o DATE CITY MANAGER �/1.�Q�s.� /� �� ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF FORT WORTH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION ASSESSMENT PAVING AT 11 LOCATIONS, NORTH SIDE PROJECT 097-24000-144 A Neighborhood Hearing was conducted by the Engineering Division at Circle Park Elementary School Auditorium on January 17, 1966, for Assessment Paving at 11 Locationson the North Side, Pr oiect No. 097-24000-144. The procedures concerning owner participation in the cost of paving, including methods and policies of determining assessments, street construction standards, and method of payment were explained to the 18 persons in attendance. UNIT 1, SPRINGER AVENUE - White Oak Lane to Ester Drive No objections to the paving were stated at the hearing. UNIT 2, CHESTNUT AVENUE - N.W. 31st Street South 250 Feet No objections to the paving were stated at the hearing. UNIT 3, LAGONDA AVENUE - Park Street to N.W. Nineteenth Street. No objections to the paving were stated at the hearing. p�\ UNIT 4, ROBIN STREET - Lagonda Avenue to Nabers Street CCU No objections to the paving were stated at the hearing. UNIT 5, NINETEENTH STREET - N.W. Eighteenth Street to Lagonda Avenue No objections to the paving were stated at the hearing. UNIT 6, LAGONDA AVENUE - N.W. Nineteenth Street to Nabers Street No objections to the paving were stated at the hearing. UNIT 7, CHESSER BOYER ROAD. - Sylvania Avenue to Tom Ellen Street For a number of years, residents of the North Riverside Estates Addition who have permanently paved streets have requested the Public Works Department to provide paved access over Chesser Boyer Road to Sylvania Avenue. Chesser Boyer Road is an important segment of the street net- work north of 28th Street and west of Beach Street. The section of Chesser Boyer Road now unpaved will be improved 40 feet wide with reinforced concrete. Industrial type street speci- fications are needed because of existing and new industrial development activity in the area. Mrs. Henry Salam, 4116 Ranier Court, the owner of Tract 1B, J. C. McComas Survey No. 1039, stated she was of the opinion that her property value would not increase by the amount of the proposed assessment. Because the tract has exceptionally long frontage on Chesser Boyer Road in relation to its depth, the Public Works Department obtained an outside independent appraisal which justifies a reduction in the assessment from $13,300.44 to $10,000.00, and which is acceptable to Mrs. Salam. The Public Works Department recommends the assessment against Tract 1B be reduced to $10,000.00. B. J. Tillman, representing T & P Railroad, stated that the railroad did not feel it would derive any benefit from the paving. ATTACHMENT "A" Page 2 of 2 UNIT 8, MAURICE STREET - Sylvania Park Drive to West Beach Street; UNIT 9. WEST BEACH STREET v Maurice Street (to the west) to Maurice Street (to the east); UNIT 10, MAURICE STREET - West Beach Street to Harper Street; and, UNIT 11, HARPER STREET - Maurice Street to Service Road, Hwy. 121. Mr.. Warren Donaldson, 610 Riverside Drive, the owner of Tract 9, L. G. Tinsley Survey, questioned why the street was being paved. Mr. Donaldson stated he was opposed to paving the street but would help pay to have the street graveled. The paving of Maurice Street, Unit 10, was initiated by the City at the request of Lubri- cation Engineers, Inc., who have constructed a large office building costing in excess of $250,000 on Tract 11, L. S. Tinsley Survey. A large parking lot with entrances and exits on Maurice Street has also been constructed. The company has donated a strip of land con- taining 6971 square feet for use in widening Maurice Street. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department is of the opinion that the paving of these streets will benefit and increase the value of all the surrounding property and it is to the best interests of the City and the public-at-large to complete the paving. (See Attachment "A-1"). Units 8, 9, and 11 were included in the project to provide continuous paving in the area. Two parcels of right-of-way, both belonging to Mr. Donaldson, must be acquired for the paving of Maurice Street, Unit 10, Purchase of the parcels is recommended in M&C L- 2002 which is also included for City Council consideration on April 11, 1966. �t cry E� �Rr .81 rry, r� ATTACHMENT "B" Page 1 of 12 11 LOCATIONS - NORTH SIDE 097-24000-144 PER CENT CONTRACTPIICIL.......................................................................................................... 109,928.45 ENGINEERING ............................................................................................................. 10,992.85 ESTIMATEDCONSTRUCTION COST..............................................................................................................= 120J21.30 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE 7,103.29 59.7 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 4,799,80 40.3 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 119 903.09 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT»....................................................s 42,870.60 35.5 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 48,280.11 39.9 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................= 91,150.71 75.4 LESS CREDITS,GRANTED................................................................................................ 26,025.65 21.5 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT. ............................................................................................................................ 652125.06 53.9 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LAM......................................... .....................................$j5j,796.24 46.1 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET *11,136.09 2,266.5 PER CENT 100.0 20.4 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 88 36 CUMULATIVE RESULTS OF PER CENT 100.0 40.9 THE POSTCARD SURVEY ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 80 33 PER CENT 100.0 41.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 49 32 DffICIAt RECORD PER CENT 100.0 65.3 CITY SECRETARY OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 31 1 f T. WORTH, TEX. PER CENT 100.0 3.2 *767 feet City owned property not included. ATTACHMENT "B" Page 2 of 12 SPRINGER AVENUE WHITE OAR UNE TO ESTER DRIVE PER UNIT 1 CENT CONTRACTPRICl.....................................................................................I................. ..s20.087.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 2-009-70 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................$22,095.70 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 2,543.3 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0_0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE....................................:....... 2,543.3 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 15,641.32 70.8 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSEMD..........................................................................................s 15,641.32 70.8 LESS CREDITS GRANTID................................................................................................ 2,330.86 10.6 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 13,310.46 60.2 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGl......................................................................................................i 8,785924 39.8 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINBT NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 2;543.3 10309.5 689.0 467.4 1,386.9 PER CENT 100.0 51.5 27.1 18.4 54.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 31 19 10 4 17 PER CENT 100.0 61.3 32.3 12.9 54.8 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 27 16 8 4 15 PER CENT 100.0 59.3 29.6 -14.8 55.6 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 16 15 7 2 7 PER CENT 100.0 93.8 43.8 12.4 43.8 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 11 1 1 2 8 PER CENT 100.0 9.1 9.1 18.2 72.7 OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. WORTH, TEX. Attachment "B" Page 3 of 12 CHESTNUT AVENUE N.W. 30th STREET TO N.W. 31st STREET UNIT 2 PER CENT CONTRACTPfliCE............................................................................................................=55212.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 521.25 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST........................_..................................................». ..... .......................... ..s59733.75 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................700.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. O.O 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................700.0 10010 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$49305.00 75.1 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSSAMOUNT AIDSEUED..........................................................................................$49305.00 75.1 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 19623000 28.3 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 2,6820 00 46.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGIL.......................................................................................................$39051.75 53.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET *650,0 300.0 50.0 0.0 600.0 PER CENT 100.0 46.2 7.7 0.0 92.3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 10 5 1 0 9 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 9010 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 10 5 1 0 9 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 90.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 6 5 0 0 6 PER CENT 100.0 71.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 0 1 0 3 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 *50 feet City awned property not included. 1, SECREURY FT. WORTH, TOL Attachment "B" Page 4 of 12 IAGONDA AVENUE PARK STREET TO ROBIN STREET UNIT 3 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................i 8.482.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 848.28 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s9,331.03 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................697.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE,............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................697.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................i 41,286.55 45.9 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$4v 286.55 45,9 LESS CREDITS GRANTED...................................................................................I............ 1.042.05 11.1 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 3'244.50 34.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.................................................. ..........................,.........................i 6,086.53 65.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 697.0 300.0 300.0 190.0 207.0 PER CENT 100.0 43.0 43.0 27.3 29.7 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 10 6 5 2 3 PER CENT 100.0 60.0 50.0 20.0 30.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 9 6 5 1 3 PER CENT 100.0 66.7 55.6 11.1 33.3 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 7 6 5 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 85.7 71.4 14.3 14.3 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 F�. WaR�N, TEX. Attachment "B" Page 5 of 12 ROBIN STREET LAGONDA AVENUE TO NABERS STREET PER UNIT 4 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................55,255.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 525.55 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 59781.05 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................693.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE........ ...................................693.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT..................................................I...$49 2610 95 73.7 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................S49261.95 73.7 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................ .................................................... 2•402.73 41.6 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 1.859.22 32.1 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................$3v 921.83 67.9 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAYING SUBMITTED No. OF FRONT FEET *522.0 200.0 100.0 80.0 342.0 PER CENT 100.0 38.3 19.2 15.3 65.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 10 4 2 2 6 PER CENT 100.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 9 4 2 2 5 PER CENT 100.0 44.4 22.2 22.2 55� OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 5 4 2 2 1 PER CENT 100.0 80.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 4 0 0 0 4 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 *171 feet City owned property not included. till S NX, Attachment "B" Page 6 of 12 NINETEENTH STREET 18th STREET TO LAGONDA AVENUE UNIT 5 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$3,214.75 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 321.48 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................ .s39536.23 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE.................................485.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................485.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$20662065 75.2 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$ 20662065 75.2 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 119600 65 55.4 'TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT.......................................................................................................................... 702.00 19.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................* 29834.23 80.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET *199.0 107.0 0.0 0.0 199.0 PER CENT 100.0 53.8 0.0 0.0 100.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 1 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 1 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 1 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 0 0 0 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *286 feet City owned property not included. gVICIWl WORO C11`I SECO�pRy F1, WORTN, 1�• Attachment "B" Page 7 of 12 LAGONDA AVENUE N.W. 19th STREET TO NABERS STREET UNIT 6 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................$ 5,422.25 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 542.23 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST..,...........................................................................................................$ 5 s 964.48 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE............................... 687.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.. ........................... 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE....... ................................ 687.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................$ 41,225.05 70.8 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................54,225.05 70.8 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 29321.04 38.9 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 1,904.01 31.9 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE........................................................................................................5 4,060.47 68.1 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET *427.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 427.0 PER CENT 100.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 5 1 0 0 5 PER CENT 100.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 5 1 0 0 5 PER CENT 100.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 4 1 0 0 4 PER CENT 100.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 0 0 0 1 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 *260 feet City owned property not included. p�1 Clay SEc��`�pRti ATTACHMENT "Bn Page 8 of 12 CHESSER BOYER ROAD SYLVANIA AVENUE TO TOM ELLEN STREET PER UNIT 7 CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................= 48,622.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 4,862.20 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 53,484.20 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 13 �� 3.1 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................4s040.5 96.9 TOTAL FOOTAGE...........................................40170.5 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.....................................................4 1,368.90 2.6 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 42,546.46 79.5 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................i 43,915.36 82.1 LESSCREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 12.731.15 23.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 31,184.21 58.3 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......:................................................................................................. 22,299.99 41.7 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 4,170.5 200.0 3,225.5 745.0 PER CENT 100.0 ( 4.8 77.3 17.9 O PARCELS OF PROPERTY 8 04 2 3 3 PER CENT 100.0 z 25.0 37.5 37.5 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 8 2 3 3 PER CENT 100.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 6 2 2 2 PER CENT 100.0 33.3 33.3 33.4 E-1 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 F1�p� DE��DD Attachment "Ba Page 9 of 12 MAURICE STREET SYLVANIA PARK DRIVE TO BEACH STREET UNIT 8 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................= 3p977.50 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 397.75 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST...................................................................................................I..... ..s} 4,375.25 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 522.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE............................................ 52200 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................: 39210.30 73.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSS AMOUNT ASSMED..........................................................................................Ij 39210030 73.4 LESS CREDITS GRANTED...............................................................................I................ 340.65 7.8 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT.............................................................................................................................. 26869065 65 6 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE................................................I......................................................t 10505o60 34.4 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 522.0 O'O 291.0 231!0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 55.7 44.3 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 3 0 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 't3 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 W 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 ,� 0.0 50.0 50.0 .rl OWNERS LIVING ON STREET O H 0 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 >1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 •r-I OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 V 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 wit Attachment "B" Page 10 of .12 WEST BEACH STREET MAURICE STREET TO ljlAURICE STREET UNIT 9 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE.................................................................................................. .........i3,204.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 320.40 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................i 3,524.40 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 336e O 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE...... ........................... ..... 336.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT.....................................................i 1,,002.45 28.4 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.. ................................................ 1$063.95 30.2 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED......... .... ...........................................................................i2y 066.40 58.6 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 0.00 0.0 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 2'O66.40 58.6 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.............................................................................. .........................i 1'458.00 41.4 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 336.0 0.0 163.0 173.0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 48.5 51.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 -p 0 1 1 ru PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 0 H 0 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 1 1 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 Attachment "B" Page 11 of 12 MAURICE STREET BEACH STREET TO HARPER STREET UNIT 10 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE...........................................................................................................s5,799.00 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 579.90 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s6,378.90 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE..,............................. 189.99 20.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 759.30 80.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE.,...... ................................. 949029 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT--............ ...............................$ 19168.43 18.3 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 4,1669070 73.2 GROSS AMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................$5p838.13 91.5 LESS CREDITS GRANTED................................................................................................ 985.52 15.4 TOTAL NET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 49852.61 76.1 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE......................................................................................................i 1 F 526.29 23.9 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 949.29 349.63 63.33 536.33 PER CENT 100.0 36.8 6.7 56.5 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 5 2 1 2 PER CENT 100.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 4 4-) 1 .1 2 PER CENT 100.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 -I--N OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 2 H 1 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 >. 50.0 50.0 0.0 OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 2 0 0 2 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 v '0 • Attachment "B" Page 12 of 12 HARPER STREET ir1AURICE STREET TO SERVICE ROAD HIGHWAY 121 UNIT 11 PER CENT CONTRACTPRICE............................................................................................................s 651.20 ENGINEERING .............................................................................................................. 65.12 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST................................................................................................................s 716.32 100.0 RESIDENTIAL FOOTAGE................................ 120.0 100.0 COMMERCIAL FOOTAGE.............................. 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FOOTAGE 120.0 100.0 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT......................................................s 73$.00 103.0 COMMERCIAL ASSESSMENT.................................................... 0.00 0.0 GROSSAMOUNT ASSESSED..........................................................................................S 738.00 103.0 LESSCREDITS GRANTED....................................................................I........................... 288.00 40.2 TOTALNET ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................................ 450.00 62.8 NET AMOUNT PAID BY CITY AT LARGE.......................................................................................................s 266.32 37.2 SIGNED RESULT OF POSTCARD SURVEY ORIGINAL FOR AGAINST NO OBJECTION TOTAL PETITION PAVING PAVING SUBMITTED NO. OF FRONT FEET 120.0 60.0 60.0 0.0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 PARCELS OF PROPERTY 2 1 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 V 50.0 50.0 0.0 CN NO. OF PROPERTY OWNERS 2 .j 1 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 H OWNERS LIVING ON STREET 1 T 1 0 0 PER CENT 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 U OWNERS LIVING ELSEWHERE 1 0 1 0 PER CENT 100.0 0.0 100.0 vvi 'Xii _Hlauhl li + WINES U13 W Ix > N 10 O 3 C4.4 cn n O Q w O V W f- ►- IL fn N z F. O tL O t9 0 o IL ac Q z 0 IL LLI ~ J a N LY %0 tn o w O ¢ w N011113d m m m m m w O AlNO1S as >+ a a o o a 0 z W N 0000 O O O 0 00 N 0 %O NIx w ~ .Y n r1 d 2 NIL W "1 cn N M cq N N Q a Q 0 0 I.- W ten 0 N Ln in ® n n M , i NZN N:) N �^+ do O cr a N ( L' F^ �aQ z w IY QW O In tn in tn in tn In In W% 0- 0 ID �O IC �D %D %D �D 10 �O Z� z O W N O Ln O Ln O W v1 m U.W 10 �a Ln n 10 0 � U. a U Z z O CD f — 11 a 41 c m v Q a N w Y � } m H K Zr W a o o z f' as as w w w a o 00 n 0 O n .0 0 0 J v1 v1 to ®G %0 pa Pd bd M Z Z y O Al 3 N O Z as as as m 00 go ao pa P4 pa� o ca 0 i N W OC O a. W 3 F] Ll. °Xa G .�4 cn r�3°n a 1- 4 a N z M H pC W ia0 Q $4w Q ma ma o" C9 ma a m % v� a F+I-• as o w a s+ ao o eo W w w ++ to a . ++ u a >. C eo u�z{w z 0- 0 " M A tOo 0 -4 4 o tom+ „ R 7C H aLo cl 4 Q M M G a 41 M a .� O pa a U M Xul v >;m a a aA a o. ww uas a" 1. U Jng [17 z IL a07 N Va0 AH a a+ OPO a � y ¢ i7O � O 4%O w0 CoY1 a Qv1 M-4 MO � % .~-� Id0 4400 to cx a I .� a1 N w a s W n1 W cl 0 m O 02 00.-a 0 1- < a wa aarn Aa", as -W c7w uIn U� A 0 C4 wo, a,m .Y31 W > T wi N �4 _ n p � m F- a W p U W ~ t f LL N N Z �p N O Z R co IL o cm o a m a z O J w O N O n %D %D W W m N011113d 0 w 0 03NDIS o 0 0 0 0, 4) Al o 0 Z to at o o Yor+ o ® voi o o Ln �+ O w� 0 Cn n en P-i 7 7 �D w M tn co m m cn w Cl N w ao O w 00 Pr N z w D% r, m o r. co O o cn cn N p N 7 N T w w I N Q wen 1 g f+ �D ao cnC.1 w 0,4 Q 'r F W f Q W O .w-+ .w Ln � -i �IL 0 v9 �O ID Z O W m w N O w N O O 10 M w %D00 .O O n .D .D 00 aq u 2 � Z O ar O F- IL O m IL Cl „ w a N 3 �7 W tn p Y o J m 4 a a o %D J, m o 10 L d > a O a w n w w cn -4 .D 00 J O %D in G t win w w .t lie jr 4 A A' 3NOZ c 9$ oa a0 w as as as ai as as oa w va o � O N W 4 0 W Z D: o a o a ON c a a u14 m ,..7 rn p z 6 a .r ai a C9 U' +r a 0 Wa '"i W a cd Z W a s �o m w a~i a w a, "' s+ •+ w .a $+ a r+ � >~ aC+ s+ G p d O + �+ mW ILN w m 04! mzz � z S (A U Z W 9 3 a IL m� m � a CL Q P. a, 0. 54 P. OD isCn G7 +d 14 ®N 007 dy dH Q w O 640 d �) $4 N M m m .i P. 0 eny0 00 w0 �$4,111 0m QM -4%D Q04n 66u. 0. C'OJx � Pq� aCa {�0~0 131 'HIUM gj } W > lzv1 Zip rl 00 42N r. O Q W w0 V W �- N W o .4 2 O Z Q - � a O 0 o U- oC Q z O u ain a m W O n 0 W � U. N011113d (A m to 0W m 03N9IS o ° a a a a a a o 0 W N z0WI- o N C> voi OD a .-4+ O W!- W rn C4 m �® n M n Ln QQ vt ON M at en cn -+ m w v Ln co Ln Ln co Ln 0 0 W vl %0 00 N N N m 00 1� c-4 W Z to N:) U) w .a vt -oi 00 U) Ln �7 Ln Ln M �+ m w H O Q Q ,--� �aU. Z~ O N vti CO en O W n h h 00 a, t° (n I° W W W W M 0) 00 M 47 vd 1+ z d A d 2 O a c _ _ _ c ca a O 1" O m m d 0 41 a iJ $ U) Q 3 H Ln W i O Y. � >- J H m W +J •D n W a a rn a W a O o w r, o dF .,W 41 � d `O .t! o W Ln ON � o w .N �a w W ° Ln .,� °_d "le v1 U 'z ti Z 40 N 04 A W W 3 N O Z va as oo as as ca as ao FQ > o o 4 O W z 02.N O O a N = a C O Z 34 o°d a°4 w m a W e a Q A t+ N k W 4 O ",G' a a a s •rd ° W 04 00 A bo u 9) H a �+ a 14 W a � m z z qBq�-I z a- .4 G C 0 ai A-� w n4 M W g aLLJg 4 Q cc 3 A a a iM+ z M cc W O r4 P.U) Ui w W Z r0 w f1, H t1 CL w V ..U 01 S7. -4 f/N i+F7 ¢ w y O N low no ca u u a a a aawa 440000 04m 300 cn0 m "0 [E-1 �n4 1-4 4 a (n 3 r'y 1�atl13���54Ln a z a W W U w r O F W N 4 N z a z a s 0 I o w ¢ a z O w a � O Q cn N cOn eOn v�1 000 W U cr N011113d 03NOIS w a a � w N z N crt: O O ® O QWF- yaj QaQN N M ao cn W U O p !- W w Ln O rNi 'r N z N at • N0 W O O Ln � N cn cn cn z w Ix O Q w � Ln Ln In ca 0 U. .c %Q %c F Ci z '^ O W O O �D O d M W L w Ln en W W ti w a w u z d z 0 y 0 _ I.- — ,a a 0 u 0 U a W v? V) S Ln W In i 0 Y �D } m F- N w ,Z7 a a 0 � "' d 0 o o to J 10 1 fsy Ci .4 en .� Li w ca z r 3NOZ � ca co as ca In w r� 0 03 N W 7 � a O W z v o cr m 0 o o c P. $ c U) a o a z ,°1+ ,M z W ., � m a Q U N U d U d 4 N 14 4V F F w O W a CO 00 00 OO g F a n c) a U N w z w 41 VJ of to ®9 M en ay to �¢,w 0 .9 ae ae 4c Lt. la. co300 3 co 3 u co W Ix w Oq � N Z to N en tn tn N �a .a Z H Q w wo u w H w CO) N _Z O Z a Qo CD o w c Q z 0 li w Q J 0. w 0 W O to Z W N 011113 d 03N91S 0 o o w eu o 0 0 ztwm� -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a' N N N N N N N H en Q Q Q V O H W to O LM %n to wl W% W% Ln N NZ N N O W O .-+ O O O O O O N p m a N M �O cn cnM N1 m m O� O Q w O a .%n� Ln gn Ln a z O W O O O O O O O O O W N O Ln an an an N in in IL U. e Z U ~ C � a c m u Q o Ln N Ln W p O Y O p o 0o o p A Z p W 0- 0 u a O O a+ no n O � J a+ �l a+ CA m W e4 M 3NOZ cQ in as ao P4 as as w W � O y� 0 N W o. 4 o w Z IA. ail N C O dl r Q c a 0 C � cn w 0 -8 oo co it ao en w m U 0 0 Z ao no m ao a n n r, a:ao Al a+ e a cn Q m en .d M a en en cn CI a m m z a � a � � � .a oe oma as o P4 a 14 a� a� o$ a� a w os as w Q o a w eo m 1-+W Z COSO% 010% � O� NQ% xm ^ 00% � T � PO h' U Q' a(X etl L Cd 41, Gir+ 1J m 41 W L ftl T4311 LJ tip i.1 LM C a u. 0. 0 04 a a4 P4 a4 Pr a4 P. a4 w > cr w m 0 U) z3t (n z cr 1.- 4 w W WU) U) z 0 z 4 CL 0 (m 0 U. lei r 4 —1 M cr U) 0 w Wcr N011113d 03N91S w Z U)cr. t m U)0 W w�- Q O 04 2 U) LL w ou aNaa cr cq O U)z 0) U)M U) Cr z Cr:E U) 0 % U) z wm w 0 C IL 0 c U. Z 0 W CC w LL LL z z 0 lWfl O �7- 7:1 a A a 0 0 co w a x >- co Ix w CL o w cc CL 0 3NOZ O > t- o to0. (X < U) w 0 w Z OC cr 0 0 0 4-A', 0 1 .4 �41, z 0 v I" p cn tr z ui 0 W M F-3 z z z CL LU UJ a 4 �t 4 (n ui z LL uj Lo LO x iz ou L. Ck. en N z o o � F Q W O V w (- f- IL N Ln n C F z c O O Q o Ii w Atz O w F J t1 N L O LM c0 W LL rc N011113d w ae m 03NSIS x®w a Ln Ln 0 z N w F QO �i r� O O W h h O N U. W �7 Or, N f- Ln N N Oh a Q Q CC N N cq cn a7 N N N w v 0 M (j)F N O to con tn ® W to Ln (N 0 N Z M N co cn O M cn® 114 0 M CM m M IW-w O cn cn cM Ln cn kn in V1 Q W O ri ri ra �+ 1 1 a LL co .o .� ZF p 0 W 17 con con o ® o voi voi �o m W W W x u 41 O k 3 d 3 z 41 ,+ z O w > +' _ ~ w •4 w° F x w G o w co v a zo �: o w z " o Y M M N M N N 04 N� C4rN-1 r•1 rN-1 F q W d a O� �N� Ct) N a 00 6 10 r ® o N PS 'a a,Gi rn �e N .04 H d o 3NO2 z w as aw s+Q co ao aI eaPei aI o � c U) w Cl ® w z to or w c o o U) ^ Q F d v d a, 4 4) opi a ®+ o W a a ro o sue+ i� 0 0 z ma, ww w to a o y w s a Q IY w w > 04 0 C QI w 1 '�C c0 o W {{.... kA Q 3 d z d � ar k 4 p °o w 'O z Z 2 W Q. ^?� ^3C fJ O O H 3 ,F, 4 O 0 o ++ O cq O W Qu° lL r-c w ry w C6 07. 4 °O CD 00 0 OD OD .a nr rr co Cd •. W m Q va aa, � X w mz A o .`� L14 ep pc� C� W w z U. w w a M 8 w u ,4 O 41 u 0 0-4 rr a m >1%D 19 It ,� w r`6 ra �-+ �5 o 00 a 0 o® o rr 0 o ey rr v r4 oD rr �o ra (- [n a: a W O co O Ol 0o co as at w M w n ro 0o -A co 00 d d 134 96 V .-a V rd A rw Ir+ry A W N •X31 w > z 0*s N Pa p K 1.- 'z W wo v W I.- uA- U) z 00 a z et O 0 o W cr a Z O w J ° U) 0 0 W LL O Cl) w N011113d 03NDIS o, c ZNIr � �. a OWF 0 P° to 1L C-4 N w aaa " cn O h w w sn o Z N U)M p �O y enco N Ft9 Q Q v? 4w0 crate Z� z O W O n I LL UW. �' w u 0 0 z 1 14 z O o O H Cw � o � a+ N a z Ln W a Y r� p 7- m .� H m p W CL a O c Fa a o Go 3NOZ PQ oPQ U) w o ® W Z w o, O O pa as Q N = a O 0 Z S1 O Z W c en i( CC ap F.�,y Z Z W 2 W g�e ,, Q 1 .1 1 a 0 Z O 14 0% � cnxw 14co aawa 3 .4 W �ad�aa�s > cn aaoa3a ma«�o O o n Ln Ln vi W) r n G Q W w0 U W H �— LL. N N z o O tn �n a o �. o LA- 0 Q J o N O Ln w N011113d 0 y 0 O3NDIS ai a a 0 0 z W N o Cp o Ln o .+ Z Ncr c'1 M N WOwl C O toLL W N cn fN+1 N n ,i Q N Q N .-1 N N N N w Q U o c h W Ln Ull Ln .? N z N Ln in n N to Ln Ln to v1 Con N O O W n rn rn N r n r r C4 F CO Q a z W H Ln tn QW O .�i .fir �- .�i Ln ¢a � .o �o .o 10 F� z O W O Ln to o 0 o O t+ D:W cn .o .--i to to Ln Ln n la.LL 41 41 O O 3 3 3 z .�i u .�+ ++ z 0 > _ _ _ _ N O 0 - � or C u ,$44 u G U Q N a z a, z W Y N N N A J .CIA -iN-i IDF m K p W a. a o d+5 O_ an o cn .� L liVy pc� CO3 04 3 N O Z m q PO �, as as oa pa oz o > O -4 N cr U a pOp W z q r7 O N 0 O u w a O m m $4 v Op .4 Q CDO z y W 1414 u C .14 O co�' = W x H q DI Q 4 W M w N � Q 6 q G Ol 'O C 10 -] a 0 W 0 • is F® 0a en m w, a b u pa u NCd C C a m u W � w z Q � u -p � c .+ c 0 .0 >,.0 w 6a0 e � V Q N 7 .a O Cl .i N tCCp O u O pa +1 W 2 LL O rl .r 1 -q O q 6 z 494 w a m m � F C W gg rWr� O w .� H rn r 03 win W a+ CO•a .4 V1 U O td 0 0 4 It W 0 p •4 "4-4 410 c0 .+ U O ..-e.4 W 0 Ln cCn cY a H 00 w OD ro 00 N 00 $c M w a0 0 OD .a crt 91-,,4 aaa 00 c) -4 q .r q.a N04 0 ,4 .. cn E4 U00 W >Ix1(� z; Ln � aa09l1 a M c � Q W O U W H H W N oa o � 00 o LL Ix Q z 0 Q J 4 N cr p W O O a' U. N011113d 03N91S z F W N O N V Z N M F- °o t OWF- G M Qfylf W w y Q O p u NZ y Z O N M N Y4 cr N d' 0 a �a � ZW o 0 LL LL LM P� z „ P z O ® z _o 04 � o - c� y N o W Ln O N Yeq � m cr a W a 4 O 3 0 0 J cA 0.5 3NOZ w o� O� N c o 0 0 W Z it a� 7, CC ; � OR 0 0 0 F c a 6 w Q W CL d V 0 Q Q � V .0 Z uj Q w a Fw�iT��! W ix w U) Z rn o <r Q�dQJ]�! .� n C �4 t H Q W O V W F N W Z .w O Z Q C O ca O 4. 0: Q z O 4 f' -i m a: O W � W N011113d w 03NOIS O c ZN� OWF Q Q Q Ix ara n W V O C vt U) en Z U) C W o to u t r+ cV FZ O ot Qcc W O a:n. 0 V; Z z F- O W N C% cr W rn O rn !L W i 14 41 u `Y d Z 41 M > Z O O O F W al a $4 a z a in W o Y ri } m 14 h w p W IL a O a o w 3NOZ O oIV o 4 U) W a O° W z a o c 3 w0 �o 0 O (30ei ® Z W C d a c d a ub -0b z z coo z W CL a. o 14 o g4 � U Ul bo w z W 60 a. aa g o 1 boo ccLn awa U 4 cy °..° •A�l Y11��i1YY�11•�� > Lil!�o Q re t, N z aft wft art aft N G � � H Q W WO 6) W !— �— W N cn z_ 14 O z Q a. Q cD o tz W. a z O w w � J a to OC O W c W N011113d 03NOIS 0 0 0 c P, ztwcr a Q y W 0 0 Q Q Q 00 LM O G h W awn ull af® ® O O t ® N z fn (n Q to r r a Ys Q a to W � cn nit cn cn cn ID 0 Q Q N F-� Q W Q Ln Sao Zr z O W C r r cr W 4-,, aft an aft N CIA W YL 4 z 1 g O C d. p co V Q $4 6c5 W G X aY Yi (L o ¢ O wm 0- —4 m a •--a O 04 w a rr as � J � �Ln 3NOZ 04 ra w po o o cn YY ¢ o to W W z as ® N 0 O L G O L7 Q F— oa4 �4 U O eFe® z W go 9j v k 0°V ova fig&` CO c a�a Q Q ^4°i °1 A Lam W M tzy w Z a a $ ry U aoo � q�� &� p+i�9 x m xi U Q o-5 �. �s5 � w ca m t� ¢w z a a0� an 0 vlw ®to w X Z 40 4.00 $4 co a N a a LZ4 a. eg.4 0,4 Y1e a�1 Fil-P-M—ONV713 W kH s N Z3 Q�0�3U 1�1�131a "� Lo t cn O z phi Q F Q W w0 V W H E- LL N CCM 10 iP7 O z Q t`' N W N tL O U. O ,...4 ch O <L cr Q z O �+- w h na O 0 O O WO ri 1O O tr W N011113d WVUDOHd lN3NI3AOUdWI 'IVJIddO 03NJIS O rn O ~ W u? j O CO ON j N W D 00 O O O ct O O' N co ri to <L W h w � 0 c O a, cOl n Q Q V -4 O co O � N .--I w co O rn p O O .4, �p F W d 8 O ol rt ch to z to 10 cp © N O N O O OLO O 00 N co O O M Cl) \\O N tr=i ri 1-I ri O Cl) t^ C7 Q Q 1-4I-q Q r -t w 0 Q a 0 0 0 0' o 0 0 0 0 i- u7 zo W a, 0 0 Cl) `°o r- Goo � cr W Cl) -4 in 1-4 <L U- h0 CD > aw o > o :�E O O p p aC H H ro v tj h N N� N� 'p N~ N N•L" Hc'a �Z O E O •N a) z O O O `> O\ C0, 2 tO� � _ H +- t0z tO � U 4 (�tt v a O t5 a > >+° D > 8 >. to LU d >1 t1. t) ri ,L a) 1L a! H U7 1L Qi OC a :. C� > Cl H rx w • > >H o � co o >i N Z o he to 2 c r-iN 24� -6 V ti FH• fn L[) W �t H m Q cr a 0. W oN V cv Ui O a s F H N N N H oaJ F+ cn co to i a 3NOZ x x x x w x x x o co U x .� H O t t°7, v m cr F o W Z N � w N t C 2 ro w ,� H O 0 4) 0 Ix 30 � H a c U r!' p O U ro x 4J (i •ro i� H a UI2-'• `HZ�r2Q¢i 2 Q F- a +y) [Oa mN roH XaQtT n> HH ao nCoi CW4� 0 N m 0w0rn O i- o N 00 cr � xO w- O o Cl) X 61 d4 d) a)0 W r4 co 4) r t- ro ro.x x CA x o � U) Ol-i-� •ri H x •,I < o O H al is C O i g }, F., ,4 Q 0 CA 4J m w 4 0 0 ro w M C <.6 r •rt 5 va U z cL k oo z (1) co 0 w U � a1 a o J ¢ w O O o O .QO a� O on ro\0 M N ro �(1, ttl O O O ri 4-3 O . >.D` o ri �p r-i a) 0 a) cd 41 Q Q cr, a W CQ `O C.) LO 0. kill uj U) z N QQ0�3a a Q W 1� V W ~ CJ H 1L N to z rl O Z Q N N a o 0 o w oC Q z o v w I.- J na N K O W O w W N011113d 03NDIS auvinNI ino LA W N O O � %D myW F_ a O �O ,4 a Q Q Ln in rl N F W v, to O CO N z N N �O e'1 N M N O C�0 W n n co N �Q c CA C9 Q Q 1.7 cn wm O Q a0 N Ln O . w H H .� -D V1 rl N Q W rl rl O+ N m W N .4 N Ln W W z a�f 2 0 O Gl O p 3 0, d C 3S a, Q U W � } J H m p W a F ¢ O 7 CL H N a rl rl L en J u H t0 W pWp�� M M p5 F yyF w 3 N O Z U d w w O as OH � CO W IL $ W 2 w gg to O H 0 Q r aao o w -4o w c a 4 Q Ix U U m 0 zrz z W a d u du u� Lu a 'ao . 0 � Ln W a U. w � a Z O ao ao �awa c°» r ne°n a; Ix �ytl13aS3S �1�5 W Mow { 0 Z a80S3� 1�IS1��0 aw W O V W ~ F- li <A cn M Z �-� 0 Z Q N IL O O o LL Q z o cW7 ~ J W 0 cr NOII IAd aaliv ilixi AMID 03NOIS ZNIX � o �. NNW C O O �N � W O O O L4 a Q Q V N '-1 N O F- W C7, d ON Nz M On• N cn �00 O p � � O O O C�Q Q .--� •-a N 1-� Q W O tn Lm cra0 U. O W n � fn w W ell W W y� L a ;q N z y p Z O o O H10 a o V Q F k+ 6 u7 N ei1 W o � Y H z 6s9 4 W CL O CK N Qry � F a O L L P�9 J H H E-0 ifd A5 3NOZ w o� O N W 4 $ W Z O 1pP�cY N 0 O � h fn F as z aZno c z wQ a s oOC Q W Q 3 V ® v W 14 g U Q a b a d 3 c> v> w Z �-+ a � U)i 5aa so S� } ul i/1 z cn en Q LU F- z M en �4 O 2 Q ! ri en a O (DID 10 O 1L Q' Q z O w Q j SMn M en cL W O U. cn a°D cr N M NO II 113d 03N91S allvzll7xz Alg0 Z W N rn ago o+ 0000 ID co C4 in cm in 2 N LL W N N N N eA Q Q Q V N N W t49 00 co 00 M d N z N CT aY A aY rl pO W ® CCD 0000 .®o 00 en Za,a (n eT en en A M eA C9 Q Q N .r Ll F+ Ln Q W v�-0 u�-I rl �a � M M M N mW a N ww u z z o v d* Q o t 16 0 ro �, 14 v Q J H 14 en u tl1 W A � Y H w c W F4 a o P+ a p ++ Pa8 J N M 91 6� E4 G31 Dr; fl 3NOZ Lo F� co W N W z ® crm k 0 Q FO B $4 0 V441 4M x a A z aa � a � eon eod u a m a s 4 14 of a ws ® z w a � w a� as w ►� Q 3 10 u a+ u d t- (r� o a w 9 a e`n oy v"If z Z z W a of Ba Wa o� -A 14 61 O 14 w 41 0 U u o 7 g 1� Q Q m P aJ 0 to a6 r+ cn U z W M F4 0 04 0 P4 -0p1p S W [lA Go m Ot Bea Ot- tl IG � Un 18® WN .00 pO �o cnxa oP4 4+ 4 yyco oao 000 %D M te1 rA N ri N y+M : W . \« . > uj � § 2§ , « _ LL U) \ o 0 rl � 2 2 ! . - o r . 2 2 cc ( \ m 2 N011113d �2 AXm` o3NDIS 0 §§wU) 8 S 8 - kN� uj eq 9 \ � � o 00 / k kcn � ®© « §Ik . U. 2 G i ze ! o w 0 2 ) § U.� ( � § owl : � � j 2 # � £ in w � G # ¥ � E �§ 4 § § � IL 0 n - � 7 § 3Noz # _ b� f �7 § w 3�$ / & o v . ) 2« Iw � t 3k % uj � � Ai § § ) § z U. § co �� �~ « < Lt. a. ]§ 2§ s7.S77 eat eo so 13.7., eo r3 a LL � I\OW « r, «• eat Sp _ a ! o n 4) p t I 1.J �1z 7S7 G 14 ° si L $ m o vin N , !o I 4 10 ti 6 9. E. S. E L L N I S S U R , a M n laoe AP ° _4 3'�x `�ttyt` S4 1? o N 20 sea•aee aos uJ 4' z1 76 sell V 75 �v y 4 74 71 0 Q s�st PROJECT 097-24000-144 -' 72 LEGEND S��,t'e PRESENTLY PAVED t— — 71 19 ?s: DIRT OR GRAVEL 70 N 1 >�, + PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 1 w ss, SPRINGER AVENUE 34G 1 48 m CosPROPERTY REPRESENTED BY ga" PETITION OR POLL CARD 47 57E �o 0 147 IE n SURVEY �. ooa 6B P _ OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED TO PAVING 143? 2 0 Ms $YS7�1r �i INHADED IS C HR ISTI NE k/u1 <se 4 80 i w: .�. rE oe -,\N,- (Av E: I J CITY SECRETARY WORTH, TEX.381 a 54 :THIRTY F}R� -•—.SiOT OPEN N y 22 N 00 A ,s M r y LLIJ ` 14 u s to n M �► w ►► 1 Is C Q Q Q 7 is ',o ¢ is le f - - r 17 e 1e ro �� If t� c to ° Q th s tt 4 W it M 4 tt S O _= 3 ° 0 tt s is t aTHIR IoETH� t,0o 900 t T � 7 • t : 3 tt w XA 7Cdt,4,54 ` t �5 to 1 i Il t 11 t U It , a it , _ 1 PROJECT 097-24000-144 N '!.. r w. .►� ... r Nl. a. .. .3 r n 1 It 1 It LEGEND W > 11 : If t 11 PRESENTLY PAVED 50 10 3 to s to ' f 4 f 4 + DIRT OR GRAVEL e s e t ° T T _ PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 2 A CHESTNUT AVENUE / t 14 1 14 1 14 M PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY J 1! _ En 13 : Is PETITION OR POLL CARD SURVEY cr W . 4 z -- 11 U I1 4 Q 11 OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED Z ` to s to s W a TO PAVING Q a f s f oN OWNERSHIP NOT SHAD ED IS AVINGo LORAINE Y YlT SECRETARY FT. Vw1►T N. TrY _ __-- —_-'"rr�i.Yl._._ ..Y-r'. _ ____'__ _ - _ - ,,r.Y'__ �a'.' rii�rr"�°�•�ir�YllNrWr 59 4 31 824� � s 4 s '4 �. � 1. ST q\ I Ku ,/l .4. t 12 11 10 S 16 a a If q '�' U 10 N . r I II 17 11 6 IS e 1 t) 1! 10 Is - d 7 Ks 7 j 14 20 1 4 it 17 w IS fig' n I L ti 7 S tl 7 4 a,. ,�. 4 19 • i 17 I 1 t s 4 s t 1 t s • i btu # PROJECT 097-24000-144 1 wool 0 I LEGEND ST 3 a PARKE. PRESENTLY PAVED I I c 16 Is 14 It 12 17 14 If 14 I If It =w e Ia DIRT OR GRAVEL I 14 PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 3, is 11 7— 1° 1 „ Is ° 'Q LAGONDA; UNIT 4, ROBIN; u 10 19 _ 10 Q 16 7 UNIT 5, 19th STREET; ! to ! a „ t c 8 UNIT 6, LAGONDA to Z — — ' z = tl s e1 e 0 to s PROPERTY REPRESENTED ® PETITION OR POLL CARD t: 7 = ex 7 J 19 4 SURVEY ° 20 3 L o° S c ® 0i7 E En, i ! 4 s t it „ g e xx t / Yl V NI it1 K K g Soo . W IER'SHi �ZT ED IS M ,100 " l000 NORTH SIXTEENTH ,Slo P G ST ' a - PROJECT 097-24000-144 LEGEND PRESENTLY PAVED T RA C 10,98 AC. DIRT OR GRAVEL PROPOSED PAVING UNIT 7 CHESSER BOYER ROAD ® PROPERTY REPRESENTED BY { PETITION OR POLL CARD 1 { SURVEY 1 OWNERSHIP NOT OPPOSED ® TO PAVING OWNERSHIP NOT SHADED IS {, OPPOSED TO PAVING �,y{. TR.IA 86.75AC. QP - - Q In cf Tract 4-C � 5 1 7RU4 .96 AC T R. t 8 � 5.956 AC. s- 627 PREMIER RECORD r 1 , ZSECKi'A}(,