HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 39644CIrif OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED DESIGN SERVICES
This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a home -rule municipal
corporation situated in Tarrant, Denton, Parker and Wise Counties, Texas (the "CITY"), and
Freese and Nichols, Inc., (the "ENGINEER"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Trinity
River Vision Central City — Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge — City Project No. 00144,
Article I
Scope of Services
A. The Scope of Services is set forth in Attachment A.
Article II
Compensation
A. The ENGINEER's compensation is set forth in Attachment B.
Article III
Terms of Payment
Payments to the ENGINEER will be made as follows:
A. Invoice and Payment
(1) The Engineer shall provide the City sufficient documentation, including but not
limited to meeting the requirements set forth in Attachment D to this
AGREEMENT, to reasonably substantiate the invoices.
(2) The ENGINEER will issue monthly invoices for all work performed under this
AGREEMENT. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days of receipt.
(3) Upon completion of services enumerated in Article I, the final payment of any
balance will be due within 30 days of receipt of the final invoice.
(4) In the event of a disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested
will be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. The
CITY will exercise reasonableness in contesting any bill or portion thereof. No
interest will accrue on any contested portion of the billing until mutually
resolved.
(5) If the CITY fails to make payment in full to ENGINEER for billings contested in
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 1 of 15
OFFICi�►L RECQRD
CITY SECRETARY p;
T. WORTH, TX
good faith within 60 days of the amount due, the ENGINEER may, after giving
7 days' written notice to CITY, suspend services under this AGREEMENT until
paid in full. In the event of suspension of services, the ENGINEER shall have
no liability to CITY for delays or damages caused the CITY because of such
suspension of services.
Amendments to Article IV, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. General
The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering
representative under this Agreement, providing professional engineering
consultation and advice and furnishing customary services incidental thereto.
The standard of care applicable to the ENGINEER's services will be the
degree of skill and diligence normally employed in the State of Texas by
professional engineers or consultants performing the same or similar services
at the time such services are performed.
C. Subsurface Investigations
(1) The ENGINEER shall advise the CITY with regard to the necessity for
subcontract work such as special surveys, tests, test borings, or other
subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering
work to be performed hereunder. The ENGINEER shall also advise the
CITY concerning the results of same. Such surveys, tests, and
investigations shall be furnished by the CITY, unless otherwise specified
in Attachment A.
(2) In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations,
the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test
points and sample intervals and at locations other than where
observations, exploration, and investigations have been made. Because
of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or
unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect the
total PROJECT cost and/or execution. These conditions and
cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of the ENGINEER.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.3D.09
Page 2 of 15
The ENGINEER will provide to the CITY the original drawings of all plans in ink
on reproducible mylar sheets and electronic files in .pdf format, or as otherwise
approved by CITY, which shall become the property of the CITY. CITY may
use such drawings in any manner it desires, provided, however, that the
ENGINEER shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project
other than the PROJECT described herein.
E. Engineer's Personnel at Construction Site
(1) The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site,
whether as on -site representatives or otherwise, do not make the ENGINEER
or its personnel in any way responsible for those duties that belong to the
CITY and/or the CITY's construction contractors or other entities, and do not
relieve the construction contractors or any other entity of their obligations,
duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all construction
methods, means, techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for
coordinating and completing all portions of the construction work in
accordance with the Contract Documents and any health or safety precautions
required by such construction work. The ENGINEER and its personnel have
no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor or other
entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or safety
precautions.
(2) Except to the extent of specific site visits expressly detailed and set forth in
Attachment A, the ENGINEER or its personnel shall have no obligation or
responsibility to visit the construction site to become familiar with the progress
or quality of the completed work on the PROJECT or to determine, in general,
if the work on the PROJECT is being performed in a manner indicating that the
PROJECT, when completed, will be in accordance with the Contract
Documents, nor shall anything in the Contract Documents or the agreement
between CITY and ENGINEER be construed as requiring ENGINEER to make
exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to discover latent defects in the
work or otherwise check the quality or quantity of the work on the PROJECT.
If the ENGINEER makes on -site observation(s) of a deviation from the
Contract Documents, the ENGINEER shall inform the CITY.
(3) When professional certification of performance or characteristics of materials,
systems or equipment is reasonably required to perform the services set forth
in the Scope of Services, the ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely upon such
certification to establish materials, systems or equipment and performance
criteria to be required in the Contract Documents.
F. Opinions of Probable Cost, Financial Considerations, and Schedules
(1) The ENGINEER shall provide opinions of probable costs based on the
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 3 of 15
current available information at the time of preparation, in accordance
with Attachment A.
(2) In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility
projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER has no
control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent
conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or
maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market
conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type,
management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic
and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate PROJECT
cost or schedule. Therefore, the ENGINEER makes no warranty that the
CITY's actual PROJECT costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or
schedules will not vary from the ENGINEER's opinions, analyses,
projections, or estimates.
G. Construction Progress Payments
Recommendations by the ENGINEER to the CITY for periodic construction
progress payments to the construction contractor will be based on the
ENGINEER's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling and
observation that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such
recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations
have been made by the ENGINEER to ascertain that the construction
contractor has completed the work in exact accordance with the Contract
Documents; that the final work will be acceptable in all respects; that the
ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purpose
the construction contractor has used the moneys paid; that title to any of the
work, materials, or equipment has passed to the CITY free and clear of liens,
claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there are not other matters
at issue between the CITY and the construction contractor that affect the
amount that should be paid.
H. Record Drawings
Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of
information compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent
the exact location, type of various components, or exact manner in which the
PROJECT was finally constructed. The ENGINEER is not responsible for any
errors or omissions in the information from others that is incorporated into the
record drawings.
I. Minority and Woman Business Enterprise (M/VIIBE) Participation
In accord with City of Fort Worth Ordinance No. 15530, the City has goals for
the participation of minority business enterprises and woman business
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 4 of 15
enterprises in City contracts. Engineer acknowledges the M/WBE goal
established for this contract and its commitment to meet that goal. Any
misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent misrepresentation) and/or
the commission of fraud by the Engineer may result in the termination of this
agreement and debarment from participating in City contracts for a period of
time of not less than three (3) years.
J. Right to Audit
(1) ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall, until the expiration of five (5) years
after final payment under this contract, have access to and the right to
examine and photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and
records of the ENGINEER involving transactions relating to this contract.
ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall have access during normal working
hours to all necessary ENGINEER facilities and shall be provided adequate
and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the
provisions of this section. The CITY shall give ENGINEER reasonable
advance notice of intended audits.
(2) ENGINEER further agrees to include in all its subconsultant agreements
hereunder a provision to the effect that the subconsultant agrees that the CITY
shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after final payment under the
subcontract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any
directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such
subconsultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that the
CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all subconsultant
facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space, in order
to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article together with
subsection (3) hereof. CITY shall give subconsultant reasonable advance
notice of intended audits.
(3) ENGINEER and subconsultant agree to photocopy such documents as may
be requested by the CITY. The CITY agrees to reimburse ENGINEER for the
cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect
as of the time copying is performed.
K. INSURANCE
(1) ENGINEER'S INSURANCE
a. Commercial General Liability —the ENGINEER shall maintain commercial
general liability (CGL) and, if necessary, commercial umbrella insurance
with a limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 per each
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 5 of 15
occurrence with a
i. The CITY shall be included as an insured under the CGL, using ISO
additional insured endorsement or a substitute providing equivalent
coverage, and under the commercial umbrella, if any. This
insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to any other
insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the CITY. The
Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall have no
exclusions by endorsements that would alter or nullify:
premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual,
personal injury, or advertizing injury, which are normally contained
within the policy, unless the CITY approves such exclusions in
writing.
ii. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the commercial general
liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance maintained in
accordance with this agreement.
b: Business Auto —the ENGINEER shall maintain business auto liability and,
if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less
than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall cover liability arising
out of "any auto", including owned, hired, and non -owned autos, when said
vehicle is used in the course of the PROJECT. If the engineer owns no
vehicles, coverage for hired or non -owned is acceptable.
i. ENGINEER waives all rights against .the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the business auto liability or
commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by ENGINEER
pursuant to this agreement or under any applicable auto physical
damage coverage.
c. Workers' Compensation —ENGINEER shall maintain workers
compensation and employers liability insurance and, if necessary,
commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less than
$100,000.00 each accident for bodily injury by accident or $100,000.00
each employee for bodily injury by disease, with $500,000.00 policy limit.
i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by workers compensation and
employer's liability or commercial umbrella insurance obtained by
ENGINEER pursuant to this agreement.
d. Professional Liability —the ENGINEER shall maintain professional liability,
a claims -made policy, with a minimum of $1,000,000.00 per claim and
aggregate. The policy shall contain a retroactive date prior to the date of
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 6 of 15
the contract or the first date of services to be performed, whichever is
earlier. Coverage shall be maintained for a period of 5 years following the
completion of the contract. An annual certificate of insurance specifically
referencing this project shall be submitted to the CITY for each year
following completion of the contract.
(2) GENERAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
a. Certificates of insurance evidencing that the ENGINEER has obtained all
required insurance shall be delivered to the CITY prior to ENGINEER
proceeding with the PROJECT.
b. Applicable policies shall be endorsed to name the CITY an Additional
Insured thereon, as its interests may appear. The term CITY shall include
its employees, officers, officials, agents, and volunteers as respects the
contracted services.
c. Certificate(s) of insurance shall document that insurance coverage
specified in this agreement are provided under applicable policies
documented thereon.
d. Any failure on part of the CITY to request required insurance
documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements.
e. A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material change in
coverage shall be provided to the CITY. A ten (10) days notice shall be
acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. Such terms shall be
endorsed onto ENGINEER's insurance policies. Notice shall be sent to the
respective Department Director (by name), City of Fort Worth, 1000
Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
f. Insurers for all policies must be authorized to do business in the State of
Texas and have a minimum rating of A:V or greater, in the current A.M.
Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength
and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management.
g. Any .deductible or self insured retention in excess of $25,000.00 that would
change or alter the requirements herein is subject to approval by the CITY
in writing, if coverage is not provided on a first -dollar basis. The CITY, at it
sole discretion, may consent to alternative coverage maintained through
insurance pools or risk retention groups. Dedicated financial resources or
letters of credit may also be acceptable to the CITY.
h. Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in
favor of the CITY as respects the PROJECT.
i. The CITY shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring expense,
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 7 of 15
to review the ENGINEER'S insurance policies including endorsements
thereto and, at the CITY's discretion; the ENGINEER may be required to
provide proof of insurance premium payments.
j. Lines of coverage, other than Professional Liability, underwritten on a
claims -made basis, shall contain a retroactive date coincident with or prior
to the date of the contractual agreement. The certificate of insurance shall
state both the retroactive date and that the coverage is claims -made.
k. Coverages, whether written on an occurrence or claims -made basis, shall
be maintained without interruption nor restrictive modification or changes
from date of commencement of the PROJECT until final payment and
termination of any coverage required to be maintained after final payments.
The CITY shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any insurance
premiums required by this agreement.
m. Sub consultants and subcontractors to/of the ENGINEER shall be required
by the ENGINEER to maintain the same or reasonably equivalent
insurance coverage as required for the ENGINEER. When sub
consultants/subcontractors maintain insurance coverage, ENGINEER shall
provide CITY with documentation thereof on a certificate of insurance.
L. Independent Consultant
The ENGINEER agrees to perform all services as an independent consultant
and not as a subcontractor, agent, or employee of the CITY.
(VI. Disclosure
The ENGINEER acknowledges to the CITY that it has made full disclosure in
writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest,
including personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in property abutting the
proposed PROJECT and business relationships with abutting property cities.
The ENGINEER further acknowledges that it will make disclosure in writing of
any conflicts of interest that develop subsequent to the signing of this contract
and prior to final payment under the contract.
N. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances
(1) If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or
suspected, the ENGINEER will stop its own work in the affected portions of
the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation.
(2) If asbestos or other hazardous substances are suspected, the CITY may
request the ENGINEER to assist in obtaining the services of a qualified
subcontractor to manage the remediation activities of the PROJECT.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 8 of 15
If permitting authorities require design changes so as to comply with published
design criteria and/or current engineering practice standards which the
ENGINEER should have been aware of at the time this Agreement was
executed, the ENGINEER shall revise plans and specifications, as required, at
its own cost and expense. However, if design changes are required due to the
changes in the permitting authorities' published design criteria and/or practice
standards criteria which are published after the date of this Agreement which
the ENGINEER could not have been reasonably aware of, the ENGINEER
shall notify the CITY of such changes and an adjustment in compensation will
be made through an amendment to this AGREEMENT.
P. Schedule
ENGINEER shall manage the PROJECT in accordance with the schedule
developed per Attachment D to this AGREEMENT.
Article V
Obligations of the City
Amendments to Article V, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. City -Furnished Data
ENGINEER may rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the
infoI mation provided by the CITY.
B. Access to Facilities and Property
The CITY will make its facilities accessible to the ENGINEER as required for
the ENGINEER's performance of its services. The CITY will perForm1 at no
cost to the ENGINEER, such tests of equipment, machinery, pipelines, and
other components of the CITY's facilities as may be required in connection
with the ENGINEER's services. The CITY will be responsible for all acts of the
CITY's personnel.
C. Advertisements, Permits, and Access
Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, the CITY will obtain,
arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses required
by local, state, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights -of -way, and
access necessary for the ENGINEER's services or PROJECT construction.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 9 of 15
The CITY will examine the ENGINEER's studies, reports, sketches, drawings,
specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of an attorney,
insurance counselor, accountant, auditor, bond and financial advisors, and
other consultants as the CITY deems appropriate; and render in writing
decisions required by the CITY in a timely manner in accordance with the
project schedule prepared in accordance with Attachment D.
E. Prompt Notice
The CITY will give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever CITY
observes or becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or
timing of the ENGINEER's services or of any defect in the work of the
ENGINEER or construction contractors.
F. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances Release.
(1) CITY acknowledges ENGINEER will perform part of the work at CITY's
facilities that may contain hazardous materials, including asbestos
containing materials, or conditions, and that ENGINEER had no prior role
I
n the generation, treatment, storage, or disposition of such materials. In
consideration of the associated risks that may give rise to claims by third
parties or employees of City, City hereby releases ENGINEER from any
damage or liability related to the presence of such materials.
(2) The release required above shall not apply in the event the discharge,
release or escape of hazardous substances, contaminants, or asbestos is
a result of ENGINEER's negligence or if ENGINEER brings such
hazardous substance, contaminant or asbestos onto the project.
G. Contractor Indemnification and Claims
The CITY agrees to include in all construction contracts the provisions of
Article IV.E. regarding the ENGINEER's Personnel at Construction Site, and
provisions providing contractor indemnification of the CITY and the
ENGINEER for contractor's negligence.
H. Contractor Claims and Third -Party Beneficiaries
(1) The CITY agrees to include the following clause in all contracts with
construction contractors and equipment or materials suppliers:
"Contractors, subcontractors and equipment and materials
suppliers on the PROJECT, or their sureties, shall maintain no
direct action against the ENGINEER, its officers, employees,
and subcontractors, for any claim arising out of, in connection
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 10 0f 15
with, or resulting from the engineering services performed.
Only the CITY will be the beneficiary of any undertaking by
the ENGINEER."
(2) This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the CITY
and the ENGINEER and there are no third -party beneficiaries.
(3) The CITY will include in each agreement it enters into with any other entity or
person regarding the PROJECT a provision that such entity or person shall
have no third -party beneficiary rights under this Agreement.
(4) Nothing contained in this section V.H. shall be construed as a waiver of any
right the CITY has to bring a claim against ENGINEER.
CITY's Insurance
(1) The CITY may maintain property insurance on certain pre-existing structures
associated with the PROJECT.
(2) The CITY will ensure that Builders Risk/Installation insurance is maintained at
the replacement cost value of the PROJECT. The CITY may provide
ENGINEER a copy of the policy or documentation of such on a certificate of
insurance.
(3) The CITY will specify that the Builders Risk/Installation insurance shall be
comprehensive in coverage appropriate to the PROJECT risks.
J. Litigation Assistance
The Scope of Services does not include costs of the ENGINEER for required
or requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or
assist in litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. In the event CITY
requests such services of the ENGINEER, this AGREEMENT shall be
amended or a separate agreement will be negotiated between the parties.
The CITY may make or approve changes within the general Scope of Services
in this AGREEMENT. If such changes affect the ENGINEER'S cost of or time
required for performance of the services, an equitable adjustment will be made
through an amendment to this AGREEMENT with appropriate CITY approval.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 11 of 15
General Legal Provisions
Amendments to Article VI, if any, are included in Attachment C.
ENGINEER shall be authorized to proceed with this AGREEMENT upon
receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the CITY.
B. Reuse of Project Documents
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products of
the ENGINEER, whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments of
service for this PROJECT, whether the PROJECT is completed or not.
Reuse, change, or alteration by the CITY or by others acting through or on
behalf of the CITY of any such instruments of service without the written
permission of the ENGINEER will be at the CITY's sole risk. The CITY shall
own the final designs, drawings, specifications and documents.
C. Force Majeure
The ENGINEER is not responsible for damages or delay in performance
caused by acts of (3od, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the
control of the ENGINEER that prevent ENGINEER's performance of its
obligations hereunder.
D. Termination
(1) This AGREEMENT may be terminated only by the City for convenience on
30 days' written notice. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either the
CITY or the ENGINEER for cause if either party fails substantially to perform
through no fault of the other and does not commence correction of such
nonperformance with in 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the
correction thereafter.
(2) If this AGREEMENT is terminated for the convenience of the City, the
ENGINEER will be paid for termination expenses as follows:
a.) Cost of reproduction of partial or complete studies, -plans, specifications
or other forms of ENGINEER'S work product;
b.) Out-of-pocket expenses for purchasing electronic data files and other
data storage supplies or services;
c.) The time requirements for the ENGINEER'S personnel to document the
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 12 of 15
work underway at the time of the CITY'S termination for convenience so
that the work effort is suitable for long time storage.
(3) Prior to proceeding with termination services, the ENGINEER will submit to the
CITY an itemized statement of all termination expenses. The CITY'S approval
will be obtained in writing prior to proceeding with termination services.
E. Suspension, Delay, or Interruption to Work
The CITY may suspend, delay, or interrupt the services of the ENGINEER for
the convenience of the CITY. In the event of such suspension, delay, or
interruption, an equitable adjustment in the 'PROJECT I s schedule,
commitment and cost of the ENGINEER's personnel and subcontractors, and
ENGINEER's compensation will be made.
F. Indemnification
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the
ENGINEER shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the CITY against
liability for any damage caused by or resulting from an act of negligence,
intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure to pay a
subcontractor or supplier committed by the ENGINEER or ENGINEER's
agent, consultant under contract, or another entity over which the ENGINEER
exercises control.
G. Assignment
Neither party shall assign all or any part of this AGREEMENT without the prior
written consent of the other party.
H. Interpretation
Limitations on liability and indemnities in this AGREEMENT are business
understandings between the parties and shall apply to all the different theories
of recovery, including breach of contract or warranty, tort including negligence,
strict or statutory liability, or any other cause of action, except for willful
misconduct or gross negligence for limitations of liability and sole negligence
for indemnification. Parties mean the CITY and the ENGINEER, and their
officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors.
I. Jurisdiction
The law of the State of Texas shall govern the validity of this AGREEMENT, its
interpretation and performance, and any other claims related to it. The venue
for any litigation related to this AGREEMENT shall be Tarrant County, Texas.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 13 of 15
•
If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any reason
to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality,
or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this AGREEMENT
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had
never been contained herein. Articles V.F., VI.B., VI.D., VI.F., VI.H., and VI.I.
shall survive termination of this AGREEMENT for any cause.
ENGINEER shall at all times observe and comply with all federal and State
laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any
way affect this AGREEMENT and the work hereunder, and shall observe and
comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which may exist or
may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for
such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be
considered. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY
and all of its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims or
liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law, ordinance, or
regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 14 of 15
Article VII
Attachments, Schedules, and Signatures
This AGREEMENT, including its attachments and schedules, constitutes the entire
AGREEMENT, supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, and may only be
changed by a written amendment executed by both parties. The following attachments and
schedules are hereby made a part of this AGREEMENT:
Attachment A -Scope of Services
Attachment B - Compensation
Attachment C - Amendments to Standard Agreement for Engineering Services
Attachment D - Project Schedule
Attachment E - Location Map
`YV-o
Executed this the"day of u--A it 1200 ?
ATTEST:
Marty HencNlx
City Secretary
Amy Ramsey
Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
6.30.09
Page 15 of 15
CITY OF FORT Vkf ORTH
o
p�, ernand Costa
4kssistant City Manager
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
William A. V"erkest, P.EI
Director, Transportation and Public Works
Department
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
Robert F. Pence, P.E., BCEE
President and CEO
OFFiCiAi_ RECORD
Ci`i-Y SECRETARY
T WORTH, TX
CHECKLIST OF ATTACHMENTS AND EXHIBITS
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30%Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
The Standard Engineering Contract document and Attachment A (General Scope of Services) shall
be provided by the City.
Document
Checklist This sheet
Contract Standard Engineering Contract Document
Attachment A General Scope of Services
(Supplements to Attachment A)
Exhibit A-2 Design Services: Paving and/or Drainage Improvements
Exhibit A-3 Henderson Street Schematic Plan
Exhibit A-4 North Main Street Schematic Plan
Exhibit A-5 White Settlement Street Schematic Plan
Attachment B Compensation and Payment Schedule
(Supplements to Attachment B)
Exhibit B-1 Method of Payment
Exhibit B-2 Labor Multiplier Schedules
Exhibit B-3A Summary of Fees by Basic and Extra Services
Exhibit B-3B Summary of Fees by Team Members
Exhibit B4 Design Phase Fee Breakdown
Exhibit B-5 Construction Phase Fee Breakdown
Attachment C Not Used
Attachment D Project Schedule
Attachment E Location Map
Check if included
/1
(Provided by City)
(Provided by City)
ATTACHMENT "A"
Scope for Engineering Design Related Services for Street Improvements
The scope set forth herein defines the work to be performed by the ENGINEER in
completing the project. Both the CITY and ENGINEER have attempted to clearly define the
work to be performed and address the needs of the Project. The scope is completely
described in Exhibit "A-2".
ATTACHMENT °A° TO STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED DESIGN SERVICES (REV 10-29-09)
PAGE 1 OF 1
{
EXHIBIT "A-2"
SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
(SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT "A")
DESIGN SERVICES: PAVING AND/OR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
The following is a clarification of the tasks that the ENGINEER will perform under ATTACHMENT
"A". Work under this attachment includes engineering services for paving and/or storm drain
improvements for the following:
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
General
The Trinity River Vision Central City (Trinity Uptown) project contains three bridges that will cross
the proposed bypass channel: North Main Street, Henderson Street, and White Settlement Road.
These three bridges have schematic designs already prepared by an earlier design contract with
another firm.
This project will have the following phases:
® Phase 1, the preliminary design and 30% design of Henderson Street bridge.
® Phase 2, final design of the Henderson Street bridge.
• Phase 3, final design of North Main Street bridge.
® Phase 4, 30% level design of the White Settlement Road bridge.
• Phase 5, construction phase for the Henderson Street bridge.
The type of bridge selected by the CITY during the Phase 1 significantly affects the remaining
Scope of Services. For this Scope of Services, we are assuming a bridge type that corresponds
with the CITY's current construction budget of $53,555,146 for the three bridges (including the
approaches, railroad bridges, lighting, etc., as well as escalation costs) broken down
approximately as follows:
® Henderson Street: $18,891,349
® North Main: $14,942,933
Rev 11/12/09
EA2-1
• White Settlement: $19,720,864
The bridge type assumed to be wn this budget is as follows: 1) For the railroad bridge, (DI
conventional precast prestressed beam structure, but with some aesthetic enhancements to
match the channel bridge, costing approximately $70/sf; 2) For the channel bridge, an "enhanced"
bridge consisting of precast concrete spliced -girder beams and special aesthetic detailing costing
approximately $157/sf, or a similar bridge with an estimated construction cost at or below the
CITY's current construction budget. Spliced -girder beams consist of conventional precast
concrete beam shapes, slightly modified for greater depths where required, and splices between
beam segments with post -tensioning to achieve a continuous beam over the columns that are
capable of greater spans than conventional precast beam structures.
The following items are not a part of this scope of services:
1. If another bridge type is selected by the CITY during Phase 1, additional scope and fee
may be necessary. Bridge types that could possibly require additional scope and fee
include steel or concrete arch bridges, cable -stayed bridges, rigid frame bridges, precast
concrete segmental bridges, or suspension bridges.
2. Construction phase services for the North Main bridge.
3. Final design of the White Settlement bridge.
4. Design of channel slope protection, walkways along the channel, the channel itself, ground
protection under the bridge (such as articulating concrete blocks or concrete riprap), scour
analysis, temporary drainage from the excavation below the bridge, or other similar work
related to the channel.
5. Specialty electrical lighting beyond typical street lighting and area lighting for pedestrians
under the bridge.
Upon receipt of notice to proceed, the ENGINEER will perform the following tasks:
Phase 1: Preliminary Design and 30%Henderson St Design
The purpose of Phase 1, the preliminary design and 30% Henderson Street bridge design phase,
is to first develop a preliminary design (and opinion of probable construction cost) for the
Henderson Street bridge that would also be similar for the other two bridges, and then to develop
the Henderson Street design to a 30% level. The design team will evaluate multiple bridge types
for Henderson Street, and present the CITY with sketches, layouts, and opinions of costs for
various bridge design options
EA2-2
Rev 11/12/09
A. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF HENDERSON STREET BRIDGE
1. The ENGINEER shall submit a project schedule after the design contract is fully
executed. The schedule shall be updated and submitted to the CITY along with
monthly progress reports as required under Attachment B of the contract.
2. Obtain existing data, including survey, geotechnical investigation reports,
drawings, and hydraulic data. Review all pertinent project data assembled. In
addition to data obtained from the City, ENGINEER will research and make
efforts to obtain pertinent information to aid in coordination of the proposed
improvements with any planned future improvements that may influence the
project. ENGINEER will also identify and seek to obtain data for existing
conditions that may impact the project including; utilities, City Master plans, CITY
drainage complaint files, existing applicable drainage studies and property
ownership as available from the Tax Assessor's office.
3. Conduct and document a project kick-off meeting with City core project team.
The ENGINEER shall attend preliminary conferences with authorized
representatives of the City regarding the scope of project so that the plans and
specifications which are to be developed hereunder by the ENGINEER will result
in providing facilities which are economical in design and conform to the City's
requirements and budgetary constraints.
4. Conduct up to four two-hour initial meetings over a maximum two-day time frame
with stakeholders designated by the CITY to gather input in order to develop
bridge options. Stakeholders may include the CITY, Trinity River Vision Authority
(TRVA), Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD), Streams and Valleys,
Inc.(S+V), TxDOT, Arts Council of Fort Worth, and other design consultants
associated with the Trinity River Vision. Meetings will be held individually or with
groups of stakeholders and minutes will be recorded. ENGINEER will schedule
and lead all meetings.
5. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 18 biweekly meetings
with the CITY and the TRVA during this phase.
EA2-3
Rev 11/12/09
6. Coordination with Other Agencies: During the preliminary evaluation phase the
ENGINEER shall coordinate with all utilities, including utilities owned by the City,
TxDOT and railroads. These entities shall also be contacted if applicable, to
determine plans for any proposed facilities or adjustment to existing facilities
within the project limits. The information obtained shall be shown on the
preliminary plans. The ENGINEER shall show the location of the proposed utility
lines, existing utility lines and any adjustments and/or relocation of the existing
lines within the project limits. ENGINEER shall complete all forms necessary for
City to obtain permit letters from TxDOT and railroads and submit such forms to
the City. City shall be responsible for forwarding the forms to the affected
agencies for execution.
7. Evaluate bridge aesthetics, roadway, and structural aspects affecting design.
Each of these aspects will be addressed in the development and illustration of
designs.
8. Determine other survey, geotechnical, and traffic data required.
9. Coordinate with the public artist to identify opportunities to incorporate public art
into the bridge design.
10. Environmental: Review the current Categorical Exclusion environmental
document, and meet with TxDOT to discuss and determine a scope of work, if
any, for completing the environmental review. It is our understanding that the
current environmental document is anticipated to be acceptable to TxDOT
without further modification, and that no additional environmental work is
anticipated as a part of this Scope of Services. Therefore, no other
environmental services are included in this Scope of Services.
11. Prepare multiple rough design options for the Henderson Street bridge based on
project goals, initial CITY and stakeholder input, and technical opportunities and
constraints. The design options will address the bridge spans, abutments, and
pertinent roadway approaches. The illustrations will include two-dimensional
sketches of bridge profiles and cross -sections, but not three-dimensional
renderings or animations. The design options will only be for "enhanced" bridges
Rev il/12/09
costing approximately $157/sf, and will only be for Henderson Street bridge, with
the understanding that White Settlement and North Main bridges would be
similar.
12. ENGINEER shall prepare a study of bridge and retaining wall costs to evaluate
the most cost effective combination of embankment, retaining walls and bridges
on the project. This information shall be considered in finalizing bridge lengths,
although it is possible that factors other than cost may be used in establishing
final bridge lengths and retaining wall limits.
13. Landscape Architecture: No landscape architecture design will be included in
this phase with the exception of the development of the hardscape ramp
elements adjacent to the abutments. A cost allowance, based on the previous
landscape architecture costs already developed prior to this contract, will be
included in the cost estimate.
14. Hydraulic evaluation:
i. Complete a hydraulic analysis based on preliminary designs for each of
the three bridges (North Main Street, Henderson Street, and White
Settlement Road; three total bridge designs) to determine the hydraulic
impact of the bridges with water surface elevation and velocity results for
the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500-year and SPF flood events.
Complete a hydraulic analysis of two additional modifications/refinements
for each bridge design for each of the three bridge locations (six total
additional modifications/refinements). Provide additional summaries of
hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities, and
valley storage impacts for the 10-1 25-, 50-1 100-, 500-year and SPF
events.
Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses for the bridge design for each
of the three bridge locations to the USACE along with a written summary
of the hydraulic impacts at each of the three bridges. Attend atwo-hour
meeting to brief USACE and discuss. Document the USACE's comments
related to the design upon receipt.
EA2-5
Rev 11/12/09
iv. Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
analyses, further modify the bridge design for each of the three locations.
v. Once bridge designs are finalized, complete final hydraulic analysis of
proposed bridges, including final technical memorandum documenting the
design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-1 10-, 25-, 50-,
100-, 500-year and SPF events.
vi. Submit final HEC-RAS model with technical memorandum to USACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
vii. Within one week of receiving USACE comments described above,
address comments and provide final comment response.
15. Electrical: No electrical design will be inc��ded in this phase. A cost allowance,
based on the previous illumination costs already developed prior to this contract,
will be included in the cost estimate.
16. Geotechnical Investigation/Pavement Design: An existing geotechnical study
has already been prepared and will be provided to the ENGINEER by the CITY.
A supplemental study shall be prepared by the ENGINEER to include the
following:
i. The additional study will include engineering studies only. No additional
borings or geotechnical testing is included.
Pavement design per TxDOT requirements for 700' to 800' pavement
lengths along Henderson on each side of proposed bridge plus 3 short
intersecting streets along these lengths.
Pavement design per TxDOT requirements for 400' to 11000' pavement
lengths along North Main on each side of proposed bridge plus 3 short
intersecting streets along these lengths.
Active earth pressures behind pier supported abutment retaining walls
that are to be used as flood walls and subject to rapid draw down
conditions.
v. Groundwater hydrology studies based on elevated water levels within the
channel followed by rapid draw down within the channel.
EA2-6
Rev 11/12/09
vi. Recommendations for backfilling flood walls to allow for drainage behind
the flood walls.
vii. L-Pile analyses for piers supporting the MSE walls.
17. Prepare order -of -magnitude opinion of probable construction cost for each
design option. Costs shall cover all three bridges. Since only the Henderson
Street bridge will be preliminarily designed during this phase, the opinion of
probable construction costs will be based on the costs for Henderson Street, and
extrapolated to the other two bridges based on square foot costs with an
appropriate contingency factor.
18. Conduct and document up to three informal 2-hour review meetings with CITY
core team at FNI offices to review the initial design concepts and probable costs.
At the conclusion of these meetings, one bridge option will be selected for
further refinement.
19. Further refine the single bridge option chosen by the CITY core team. Develop a
3D rendering of the bridge at Henderson Street only. Develop 2D elevation
sketches of the bridges at North Main and White Settlement. Prepare a
presentation of the chosen design for use at the Citizen Advisory Committee
stakeholder collaboration workshop.
20. Conduct and document a 2-hour Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) stakeholder
collaboration workshop to briefly review the initial design concepts considered by
the CITY core team, and then present for comments the final bridge option
already selected, together with an opinion of the probable construction costs.
The goal of the workshop will be to provide information to the CAC and receive
minor comments on the design.
21. Coordinate open -house public meetings to be held over a two -week period,
primarily at lunchtime and evening hours (total of 12 two-hour meetings).
Specifically:
i. Develop a mailing list of people and organizations to notify about the
meetings.
ii. Develop and mail up to 10,000 notification postcards.
wit
2-7
Rev 11/12/09
Develop key messages to be communicated to the public regarding the
project.
iv. Prepare handouts for the open house meetings containing the key
messages.
v. Notify the media of the open house public meetings.
vi. Provide information to the TRVA and CITY for posting on their Web sites
and other publications and forums used by the TRVA and the CITY.
vii. One member of the ENGINEER'S team shall attend and facilitate each of
the 12 two-hour open house meetings, collect sign -in information, provide
handouts, record comments on an easel board or other means, and
provide a written summary of the public comments gathered at the public
meetings.
22. Deliverables:
i. Five (5) 11"x17" copies of the CAC presentation.
ii. One DVD with an electronic copy of the presentation.
His Up to four (4) 36"x48" graphic boards.
iv. Meeting minutes documenting discussions of the CAC presentation and
the open -house public meetings.
B. 30% HENDERSON STREET DESIGN
1. Further develop the engineering plans to a 30% level as defined by TxDOT. The
extent of the Henderson Street bridge design is as shown in Exhibit A-3.
2. The design of the Henderson Street bridge will involve multiple reviews of the
construction documents at various stages (initial bridge layout, 30%, 60%, and
90%) and by various organizations (notably TxDOT, Fort Worth Western Railroad,
USACE, TRWD, and the City of Fort Worth). These reviews can take several
weeks each. To meet the required schedule for the construction of the Henderson
Street bridge, the ENGINEER will have to continue designing concurrently with
ongoing reviews, as opposed to waiting for review comments that could
significantly change the design. While efforts will be made to coordinate
Rev 11/12/09
3
5.
Rev 11/12/09
extensively with the various agencies before formal review submittals, if significant
design changes and rework are necessary due to major review comments that are
received after design has progressed, this rework will be considered an Additional
Service.
Update the current design schematic drawing.
Prepare bridge layout and railroad Exhibit A drawings.
Surveys for Design
i. CITY has previously obtained survey for this project and will provide that
data to the ENGINEER. No additional survey is included in this Scope of
Services except for survey of the railroad top of rail for a distance of 1,000
feet north of Henderson Street to 1,000 fee south of White Settlement.
Information gathered during the survey is assumed to include topographic
data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers, rim/invert
elevations, location of buried utilities, structures, and other features
relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at intersections is
assumed to already been verified by field surveys. Spot elevations are
assumed to be shown on intersection layouts with cross slope to fit
intersecting grade lines.
The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include
the following:
1. A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set
while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400:
2. The following information about each Control Point;
a. Identified (Existing. City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8"
Iron Rod)
b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system,
and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum
only.
c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in
the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of
EA2-9
radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and
North Main Street).
d. Coordinates on all P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, Manholes, Valves,
etc., in the same coordinate system, as the Control.
e. No less than two horizontal bench marks, per line or
location.
f. Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines.
g. Station equations relating utilities to paving, when
appropriate.
6. Prepare 30% submittal plans for Henderson Street Bridge/Streetscape landscape
architecturaI elements including: vehicular and pedestrian paving; decorative
walks, plazas, and planters; decorative monuments, walls, and railings;
decorative vehicular and pedestrian lighting and signals; seating and trash
receptacles; signage and kiosks; and landscape planting.
7. Public Notification and PersonnelNehicle Identification: When conducting site
visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall
carry information identifying the name of the company and the company
representative.
8. Complete a hydraulic analysis of the Henderson Street bridge design. Provide
summaries of hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities,
and valley storage impacts for the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500-year and SPF events.
i. Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses to the USACE along with a
written summary of the hydraulic impacts. Attend atwo-hour meeting to
brief USACE and discuss. Provide the USACE's comments related to the
design upon receipt.
Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
analyses, further modify the bridge design.
Complete a final hydraulic analysis, including final technical memorandum
documenting the design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-
10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500-year and SPF events.
EA2-10
Rev 11/12/09
iv. Submit final HEC-RAS model with technical memorandum to USACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
v. Address USACE comments and provide final comment response.
9. Drainage Computations: ENGINEER will review and document the storm water
watershed drainage runoff area and existing street, right-of-way and storm sewer
capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at 1" = 200'
scale from available contour maps. Calculations regarding street and right-of-way
capacities and design discharges (5-year and 100-year frequencies) at selected
critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be
calculated and shown. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes
recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed
reasonable and consistent with City and TxDOT standards. All calculations and
design shall conform to TxDOT and the City of Fort Worth Storm Water
Management Design Manual, March 2006.
10. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost.
11. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 2 meetings with the CITY
and the TRVA during this phase.
12. Deliverables: 30% Engineering Plan Submittal
i. Ten (10) copies of the schematic drawing.
ii. Ten (10) copies of the bridge layout and railroad Exhibit A drawings.
The ENGINEER shall furnish ten (10) 1111x17" copies of the 30%
engineering plans which include layouts, preliminary right -of --way needs
and cost estimates.
The ENGINEER shall also evaluate the phasing of the street and
drainage work, and shall submit such evaluation in writing to the CITY.
Phase 2: Henderson Street Bridge Final Design
Phase 2, the final design of the Henderson Street bridge, will include the preparation of
construction bid documents including plans, specifications, and cost estimates in accordance with
TxDOT standards.
EA2-1!
Rev 11/12/09
1. 60%Engineering
Upon approval of the 30% plans, ENGINEER will prepare construction documents as
follows:
a. Drainage area maps with drainage calculations and hydraulic
computations.
b. Preliminary project plans and profile sheets which will show the following
and shall be on 22" x 34" sheets:
Property Ownership
Curb Lines
Driveways
Medians (if applicable)
Sidewalks
Existing and proposed water and sanitary sewer mains.
c. Proposed roadway profile grades and elevations along each curb line;
elevations at all p.v.i.'s; p.i's half stations; high and low points; vertical curve
information; and pertinent AASHTO calculations. Profiles for existing curbs
(if any) and existing ground at the left and right-of-way lines shall be shown.
Existing found property corners (e.g. Iron pins), along the existing right-of-
way shall be shown on the plans. Profiles for existing and proposed storm
drain mains and leads shall be provided.
d. Locations of existing utilities, including appropriate SUE investigations, are
being completed by others and are not a part of this scope. Based on
information received from others, existing utilities and utility easements will
be shown on the roadway plan and profile sheets. ENGINEER will
coordinate with utility companies and the City of Fort Worth to ascertain
what, if any, future improvements are planned that may impact the project.
e. Preliminary roadway cross -sections will be developed, from the survey
notes, at intervals not -to -exceed 50 foot along the project length and will
extend 10' past the right of way line on both sides of the street. Additional
cross -sections at important features including driveways, p.i.'s of
EA2-12
Rev 11/12/09
intersecting streets, (minimum distance of 100 along cross -street at each
P.I.) walks, retaining walls, etc., will also be provided. Profiles of centerline
of driveways will also be provided where necessary. Scale will be 1" = 10'
horizontal and 1" = Z vertical.
f. Street and intersection layouts.
g. Proposed plan/profile sheets will conform to TxDOT construction legend.
Adequate horizontal and vertical control shall be provided on the plan
sheets to locate all proposed and existing facilities. Legal descriptions (Lot
Nos., Block Nos., and Addition Names) along with property ownership shall
be provided on the plan view.
h. Bridge abutment retaining walls shall be designed as flood walls in
accordance with USACE criteria.
i. Prepare 60% submittal plans and details for Henderson Street
Bridge/Streetscape landscape architectural elements including: vehicular
and pedestrian paving; decorative walks, plazas, and planters; decorative
monuments, walls, and railings; decorative vehicular and pedestrian lighting
and signals; seating and trash receptacles; signage and kiosks; and
landscape planting and irrigation.
j. Right -of -Way Research
The ENGINEER will verify right-of-way requirements already determined by
other consultants. A right-of-way map will be furnished by the CITY to the
ENGINEER for review and incorporation into the construction plans.
j. Right-of-way/Easement Preparation and Submittal
Right -of --way and easement documents will be prepared by others and are
not a part of this scope. If any modifications to the right -of --way or
easement documents are necessary, ENGINEER shall mark up the right-
of-way map to show such modifications and submit to the CITY. New right-
of-way and easement documents will then be prepared by others.
k. Utility Clearance
Rev il/12/09
EA2-13
Utility relocations are being completed by others and are not a part of this
scope. ENGINEER shall coordinate with other consultants completing
this work and provide these consultants with input on the extent of the
Henderson Street project so that utility relocations can be made.
I. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP
ENGINEER will prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) required for the project for use by the Contractor during
construction. Engineer will prepare drawings and details for proposed
SWPPP improvement that the Contractor must use during construction.
Contractor will be responsible for filing the SWPPP with appropriate
regulatory agencies.
m. Traffic Control Plan
ENGINEER shall prepare a signed and sealed Traffic Control Plan for
review and approval by TxDOT and the Traffic Division of the
Transportation and Public Works Department.
n. Deliverables: 60% Construction Plan Submittal
i. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 60%
construction plans and specifications for review to both the CITY
and TxDOT (ten (10) sets total). Generally, plan sheets shall be
organized as follows:
• Cover Sheet
• General Layout and Legend Sheet
• Drainage Area Map and Computations
• Plan & Profile Sheets
• Preliminary Cross Sections
• Standard Construction Details
• Special Details (If applicable)
The ENGINEER shall submit a preliminary estimate of probable
construction cost with the preliminary plans submitted. ENGINEER
EA2-14
Rev 11/12/09
shall assist CITY in selecting the feasible and or economical
solutions to be pursued.
o. Review Meetings with City
The ENGINEER shall meet with CITY to discuss review comments for 60%
submittal. The CITY shall direct the ENGINEER in writing to proceed with
Final Design for Final Review.
2. Final Construction Plan Submittal (90%, 95%, and 100%submittals)
a. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 60% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 90% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 60% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total).
b. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 90% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 95% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 95% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed by the
ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be a
mylar, the rest bond.
c. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 95% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 100% plans and specifications and contract documents for
bidding purposes. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17"
100% construction plans and specifications to both the CITY and TxDOT
(ten (10) sets total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed
by the ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be
a mylar, the rest bond. One electronic PDF file containing all plans shall be
uploaded to the CITY'S Buzzsaw Web site.
d. Furnish as a function of final plans, ten (10) copies of the final cross -
sections on 22" x 34" sheets. Information on these sheets will include
centerline station, profile grades and centerline elevations, roadway section
(existing and proposed), right-of-way limits. Scale will be 1" = 20' horizontal
EA2-15
Rev 11/12/09
and 1" = 2' vertical with cross sections plotted with stationing from the
bottom of the sheet, and will include laterals and inlets. CITY policy with
regard to parking design shall be maintained. Excavation and embankment
volumes and end area computations shall also be provided.
e. Public Meeting: After the 100% plans have been reviewed and approved
by the City, the ENGINEER shall prepare project exhibits, and coordinate
one public meeting.
1. Develop a mailing list of people and organizations to notify about
the meeting.
2. Develop and mail up to 10,000 notification postcards.
3. Develop key messages to be communicated to the public
regarding the project.
4. Prepare handouts for the meeting containing the key messages.
5. Notify the media of the public meeting.
6. Provide information to the TRVA and CITY for posting on their
Web sites and other publications and forums used by the TRVA
and the CITY.
7. Attend and facilitate the meeting. Collect sign -in information,
provide handouts, and record comments on an easel board or
other means.
8. Provide a written summary of the public comments gathered at the
public meeting.
f. ENGINEER's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost: The ENGINEER
shall submit a final estimate of probable construction cost with the final
plans submitted.
g. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 5 biweekly meetings
with the CITY and the TRVA during this phase
Phase 3: North Main Street Bridge Final Design
Phase 3, the final design of the North Main Street bridge, will include the preparation of
EA2-16
Rev 11/12/09
construction bid documents including plans, specifications, and cost estimates in accordance with
TxDOT standards.
A. 30% NORTH MAIN STREET DESIGN
1. Further develop the engineering plans to a 30% level as defined by TxDOT. The
extent of the North Main Street bridge design is as shown in Exhibit A-4.
2. Update the current design schematic drawing.
3. Prepare bridge layout drawings.
4. Surveys for Design
i. CITY has previously obtained survey for this project and will provide that
data to the ENGINEER. No additional survey is included in this Scope of
Services. Information gathered during the survey is assumed to include
topographic data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers,
rim/invert elevations, location of buried utilities, structures, and other
features relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at
intersections is assumed to already been verified by field surveys. Spot
elevations are assumed to be shown on intersection layouts with cross
slope to fit intersecting grade lines.
ii. The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include
the following:
1. A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set
while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400:
2. The following information about each Control Point;
a. Identified (Existing. City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8"
Iron Rod)
b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system,
and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum
only.
c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in
the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of
EA2-17
Rev 11/12/09
radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and
North Main Street).
d. Coordinates on all P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, Manholes, Valves,
etc., in the same coordinate system, as the Control.
e. No less than two horizontal bench marks, per line or
location.
f. Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines.
g. Station equations relating utilities to paving, when
appropriate.
5. Prepare 30% submittal plans for North Main Street Bridge/Streetscape landscape
architectural elements including: vehicular and pedestrian paving; decorative
walks, plazas, and planters; decorative monuments, walls, and railings;
decorative vehicular and pedestrian lighting and signals; seating and trash
receptacles; signage and kiosks; and landscape planting.
6. Public Notification and Personnel/Vehicle Identification: When conducting site
visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall
carry information identifying the name of the company and the company
representative.
7. Complete a hydraulic analysis of the North Main Street bridge design. Provide
summaries of hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities,
and valley storage impacts for the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500-year and SPF events.
iii. Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses to the USACE along with a
written summary of the hydraulic impacts. Attend atwo-hour meeting to
brief USACE and discuss. Provide the USACE's comments related to the
design upon receipt.
Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
analyses, further modify the bridge design.
v. Complete a final hydraulic analysis, including final technical memorandum
documenting the design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-
10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500-year and SPF events.
EA2-18
Rev 11/12/09
2.
vi. Submit final HEC-RAS model with technical memorandum to US/ACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
. Address USACE comments and provide final comment response.
8. Drainage Computations: ENGINEER will review and document the storm water
watershed drainage runoff area and existing street, right-of-way and storm sewer
capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at 1" = 200'
scale from available contour maps. Calculations regarding street and right-of-way
capacities and design discharges (5-year and 100-year frequencies) at selected
critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be
calculated and shown. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes
recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed
reasonable and consistent with City and TxDOT standards. All calculations and
design shall conform to TxDOT and the City of Fort Worth Storm Water
Management Design Manual, March 2006.
9. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost.
60%Engineering
Upon approval of the 30% plans, ENGINEER will prepare construction documents as
follows:
c. Drainage area maps with drainage calculations and hydraulic
computations.
d. Preliminary project plans and profile sheets which will show the following
and shall be on 22" x 34" sheets:
Property Ownership
Curb Lines
Driveways
Medians (if applicable)
Sidewalks
Existing and proposed water and sanitary sewer mains.
EA2-19
Rev 11/12/09
k. Proposed roadway profile grades and elevations along each curb line;
elevations at all p.v.i.'s; p.i's half stations; high and low points; vertical curve
information; and pertinent AASHTO calculations. Profiles for existing curbs
(if any) and existing ground at the left and right-of-way lines shall be shown.
Existing found property corners (e.g. Iron pins), along the existing right-of-
way shall be shown on the plans. Profiles for existing and proposed storm
drain mains and leads shall be provided.
I. Locations of existing utilities, including appropriate SUE investigations, are
being completed by others and are not a part of this scope. Based on
information received from others, existing utilities and utility easements will
be shown on the roadway plan and profile sheets. ENGINEER will
coordinate with utility companies and the City of Fort Worth to ascertain
what, if any, future improvements are planned that may impact the project.
m. Preliminary roadway cross -sections will be developed, from the survey
notes, at intervals not4o-exceed 50 foot along the project length and will
extend 10' past the right of way line on both sides of the street. Additional
cross -sections at important features including driveways, p.i.'s of
intersecting streets, (minimum distance of 100' along cross -street at each
P.I.) walks, retaining walls, etc., will also be provided. Profiles of centerline
of driveways will also be provided where necessary. Scale will be 1" = 10'
horizontal and 1" = 2' vertical.
n. Street and intersection layouts.
o. Proposed plan/profile sheets will conform to TxDOT construction legend.
Adequate horizontal and vertical control shall be provided on the plan
sheets to locate all proposed and existing facilities. Legal descriptions (Lot
Nos., Block Nos., and Addition Names) along with property ownership shall
be provided on the plan view.
p. Bridge abutment retaining walls shall be designed as flood walls in
accordance with USACE criteria.
q. Prepare 60% submittal plans and details for Henderson Street
Bridge/Streetscape landscape architectural elements including: vehicular
and pedestrian paving; decorative walks, plazas, and planters, decorative
EA2-20
Rev il/12/09
I
I
k�a
�.-{
400 IF
=iS Hl6 '3 'N
sap
'1S H101 03 ON
Q
----��---; for OM nomm
J o nP�
—y ao
J z •.z. c ioa < w
on
'1S H1L `3 ON I I
4
El
m I
140 In
OEM, I
ASN
---_ I L----I I }
--- I to i
-- I tt j 1 a„
�a�
-- IIFe �?
1 7Of„jj 7 $Iof
I I�•I
too
'Pol
1S H18 '3 ON, $I
— Is1 f \I s
Or
„I
ismI='
a" ®� -
w�m 3Of if
wG -» zlm Ep
gn
— 1— /.
/
y .
. '-
• '#i
Of
I O
y Off,#� f —
i - L L�
cd
— DID
i—Of
X PLO
0/" / /•
Ott
Not
Or V
CIA
3� Sl / a„ off
uAllAlk
fill N 011
Or 00
AN
o
^I/^ I;/
I E. /
I' I Wei /
,✓ �' of /
Is
Or
Of
i }/ / /
1 .
o v�i u�
ui '. /
/ „r i Z oo
/ P n m i
is
yam,
ON a
ofI I
Exhibit A=4
North Main Schematic
Sheet 1 of 1
i
i
4OF
161
Of
o0
to
Igo
-
--
—
of
DO a
o
got
M NO
KM
owl
0-1
00
I
JOB
$
At
7
Of
0
is
o
OIL
36
0
+
i
r. Right -of -Way Research
The ENGINEER will verify right-of-way requirements already determined by
other consultants. A right-of-way map will be furnished by the CITY to the
ENGINEER for review and incorporation into the construction plans.
p. Right-of-way/Easement Preparation and Submittal
Right-of-way and easement documents will be prepared by others and are
not a part of this scope. If any modifications to the right-of-way or
easement documents are necessary, ENGINEER shall mark up the right-
of-way map to show such modifications and submit to the CITY. New right-
of-way and easement documents will then be prepared by others.
q. Utility Clearance
Utility relocations are being completed by others and are not a part of this
scope. ENGINEER shall coordinate with other consultants completing
this work and provide these consultants with input on the extent of the
Henderson Street project so that utility relocations can be made.
r. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
ENGINEER will prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) required for the project for use by the Contractor during
construction. Engineer will prepare drawings and details for proposed
SWPPP improvement that the Contractor must use during construction.
Contractor will be responsible for filing the SWPPP with appropriate
regulatory agencies.
s. Traffic Control Plan
ENGINEER shall prepare a signed and sealed Traffic Control Plan for
review and approval by TxDOT and the Traffic Division of the
EA2-21
Rev 11/12/09
Transportation and Public Works Department.
t. Deliverables: 60% Construction Plan Submittal
ii. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17" 60%
construction plans and specifications for review to both the CITY
and TxDOT (ten (10) sets total). Generally, plan sheets shall be
organized as follows:
® Cover Sheet
® General Layout and Legend Sheet
® Drainage Area Map and Computations
® Plan & Profile Sheets
® Preliminary Cross Sections
® Standard Construction Details
Special Details (If applicable)
iii. The ENGINEER shall submit a preliminary estimate of probable
construction cost with the preliminary plans submitted. ENGINEER
shall assist CITY in selecting the feasible and or economical
solutions to be pursued.
u. Review Meetings with City
The ENGINEER shall meet with CITY to discuss review comments for 60%
submittal. The CITY shall direct the ENGINEER in writing to proceed with
Final Design for Final Review.
3. Final Construction Plan Submittal (90%, 95%, and 100%submittals)
h. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 60% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 90% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 1131x1T 60% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total).
i. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 90% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 95% plans and specifications and contract documents. The
EA2-22
Rev 11/12/09
ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11x17 95% construction plans
and specifications for review to both the CITY and TxDOT (ten (10) sets
total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed by the
ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be a
mylar, the rest bond.
j. Following CITY and TxDOT approval of the 95% submittal, the ENGINEER
shall prepare 100% plans and specifications and contract documents for
bidding purposes. The ENGINEER shall deliver five (5) sets of 11"x17"
100% construction plans and specifications to both the CITY and TxDOT
(ten (10) sets total). Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed
by the ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. One set to TxDOT shall be
a mylar, the rest bond. One electronic PDF file containing all plans shall be
uploaded to the CITY'S Buzzsaw Web site.
k. Furnish as a function of final plans, ten (10) copies of the final cross -
sections on 22" x 34" sheets. Information on these sheets will include
centerline station, profile grades and centerline elevations, roadway section
(existing and proposed), right-of-way limits. Scale will be 1" = 20' horizontal
and 1" = 2' vertical with cross sections plotted with stationing from the
bottom of the sheet, and will include laterals and inlets. CITY policy with
regard to parking design shall be maintained. Excavation and embankment
volumes and end area computations shall also be provided.
I. Public Meeting: After the 100% plans have been reviewed and approved
by the City, the ENGINEER shall prepare project exhibits, and coordinate
one public meeting.
1. Develop a mailing list of people and organizations to notify about
the meeting.
2. Develop and mail up to 10,000 notification postcards.
3. Develop key messages to be communicated to the public
regarding the project.
4. Prepare handouts for the meeting containing the key messages.
5. Notify the media of the public meeting.
Rev 11/12/09
6. Provide information to the TRVA and CITY for posting on their
Web sites and other publications and forums used by the TRVA
and the CITY.
7. Attend and facilitate the meeting. Collect sign -in information,
provide handouts, and record comments on an easel board or
other means.
8. Provide a written summary of the public comments gathered at the
public meeting.
m. ENGINEER's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost: The ENGINEER
shall submit a final estimate of probable construction cost with the final
plans submitted.
n. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 5 biweekly meetings
with the CITY and the TRVA during this phase
Phase 4: White Settlement Bridge 30% Design
Phase 4 will include 30% level plans and estimates for the White Settlement bridge.
A. 30% WHITE SETTLEMENT BRIDGE DESIGN
1. Further develop plans to a 30% level as defined by TxDOT for the White
Settlement bridge. The extent of the White Settlement bridge design is as shown
in Exhibit A-5.
2. Update the current design schematic drawing.
3. Prepare bridge layout drawing, and a railroad Exhibit A drawings.
4. Surveys for Design
i. CITY has previously obtained survey for this project and will provide that
data to the ENGINEER. No additional survey is included in this Scope of
Services. Information gathered during the survey is assumed to include
topographic data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers,
rim/invert elevations, location of buried utilities, structures, and other
EA2-24
Rev 11/12/09
features relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at
intersections is assumed to already been verified by field surveys. Spot
elevations are assumed to be shown on intersection layouts with cross
slope to fit intersecting grade lines.
ii. The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include
the following:
1. A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set
while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400:
2. The following information about each Control Point;
a. Identified (Existing. City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8"
Iron Rod)
b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system,
and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum
only.
c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in
the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of
radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and
North Main Street).
d. Coordinates on all P.C.9s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, Manholes, Valves,
etc., in the same coordinate system, as the Control.
e. No less than two horizontal bench marks, per line or
location.
f. Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines.
g. Station equations relating utilities to paving, when
appropriate.
5. Prepare 30% submittal plans streetscape landscape architectural elements
including: vehicular and pedestrian paving; decorative walks, plazas, and
planters; decorative monuments, walls, and railings; decorative vehicular and
pedestrian lighting and signals; seating and trash receptacles; signage and
kiosks; and landscape planting.
EA2-25
Rev 11/12/09
6. Public Notification and Personneuvehicle Identification: When conducting site
visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall
carry information identifying the name of the company and the company
representative.
7. Complete a hydraulic analysis of the bridge design. Provide summaries of
hydraulic impacts including water surface elevations, velocities, and valley
storage impacts for the 10-1 25-, 50-, 100-, 500-year and SPF events.
i. Submit the results of the hydraulic analyses to the USACE along with a
written summary of the hydraulic impacts. Attend atwo-hour meeting to
brief USACE and discuss. Provide the USACE's comments related to the
design upon receipt.
Based on USACE comments and results of preliminary hydraulic
anaIyses, further modify the bridge design.
Complete a final hydraulic analysis, including final technical memorandum
documenting the design process with hydraulic model results for the 2-, 5-
10-, 25-, 50-1 100-, 500-year and SPF events.
Submit final HEC-RAS model with technical memorandum to USACE for
review, concurrent with final bridge plan submission.
v. Address USACE comments and provide final comment response.
8. Drainage Computations: ENGINEER will review and document the storm water
watershed drainage runoff area and existing street, right-of-way and storm sewer
capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at 1" = 200'
scale from available contour maps. Calculations regarding street and right-of-way
capacities and design discharges (5-year and 100-year frequencies) at selected
critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be
calculated and shown. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes
recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed
reasonable and consistent with City and TxDOT standards. All calculations and
design shall conform to TxDOT and the City of Fort Worth Storm Water
Management Design Manual, March 2006.
EA2-26
Rev 11/12/09
9. No geotechnical engineering is included.
10. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost.
11. One member of the FNI design team shall attend up to 2 biweekly meetings with
the CITY and the TRVA during this phase.
12. Deliverables: 30% Engineering Plan Submittal
i. Ten (10) copies of the schematic drawing.
ii. Ten (10) copies of the bridge layout and railroad Exhibit A drawings.
iii. The ENGINEER shall furnish ten (10) 11"x17" copies of the 30%
engineering plans which include layouts, preliminary right-of-way needs
and cost estimates.
iv. The ENGINEER shall also evaluate the phasing of the street and
drainage work, and shall submit such evaluation in writing to the CITY.
Phases 5: Henderson Street Bridge Construction Phase
Phase 5 is the construction phase of Henderson Street bridge. Since these are TxDOT on -system
roadways, the contract construction documents will be prepared in accordance with TxDOT
requirements, the project will be bid by TxDOT, and the construction phase will be managed by
TxDOT. As such, ENGINEER shall have limited involvement during construction.
I. BIDDING
a. Bid Documents: TxDOT will reproduce and distribute bid documents.
b. Bidding Assistance: The ENGINEER shall assist TxDOT during this phase
including preparation of one additional addendum and respond to questions
submitted to TxDOT by prospective bidders. TxDOT will reproduce and deliver any
additional addenda prior to bid opening to plan holders.
c. TxDOT shall prepare conformed or "As Bid" plans and specifications for use during
the construction phase.
d. TxDOT will make available for construction the final approved and dated plans and
specifications and contract documents for distribution to the contractor.
II. ASSISTANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION
EA2-27
Rev 11/12/09
a. The ENGINEER shall review contractor's submittals, including, requests for
information (up to 23 total), modification requests, shop drawings, and other
submittals in accordance with the requirements of the construction contract
documents for the project.
b. The ENGINEER shall attend up to six meetings total during bidding and
construction and provide documentation of the observations made, as requested
by CITY or TxDOT. This maximum number of meetings is all-inclusive, and
includes pre -bid meeting, pre -construction meeting, periodic site visits, meetings
with the TRVA or CITY on progress, final punch list meetings, or any other
meetings.
c. Record Drawings are not part of the scope of services.
d. ENGINEER will endeavor to protect CITY in providing these services however, it is
understood that ENGINEER does not guarantee the Contractor's performance, nor
is ENGINEER responsible for supervision of the Contractor's operation and
employees. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the means, methods,
techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, or
any safety precautions and programs relating in any way to the condition of the
premises, the work of the Contractor or any Subcontractor. ENGINEER shall not
be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person (except its own employees
or agents) at the Project site or otherwise performing any of the work of the Project.
Rev 11/12/09
J J�
z I O
Z '
-
Exhibit A-3
Henderson Street Schematic
m
Sheet 1 of 2 W�w_
i- j
_z<wMW
;r
=t
a w ❑
' i'uIx T
u
a——
LLLk
— is N3iin�
3 I r
3
�+ -
I -
N j -
j{ ' �+
of
I
i r 1
, 3 ,
,
I
3 1 � of
_ 1
1 I tl
V i1 •A
1 m
I I
I
� • 1
1
1
�0
1
W < of I
Oi II
I j I II
I �
Z I v II
w > O �t
Oaa
3 U IZ ZIm
N
II Q Z u"CuZy� N I
Ina
Z W H 1TV
W Ol N.
N 1[1 m
ii- O Z rl-M
U I
1 O w o] 0
W i Z O 0O W O—
O 1 OO O1I-
Id l- 3 w LO N
z O z min
O O Q tD N
IM U M N z W
Exhibit A-3
Henderson Street Schematic
Sheet 2 of 2
C
1
Henderson
treet
project limits
terminate at
approximately this
DO
wC I
omt`� I I
cmo I I
0 of
M +o
ti N
OmtoN
to
to
� ¢N
1 i
i
a-
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
i
' w3l�m=cam ¢w ¢oF ¢ q .I L
// •� o= C3
Exhibit A-5
x ' .
' ` r 11 I White Settlement Schematic
,s` I
.,� I Sheet 1 of 2
'r) I
LO
+ 1 -IV a3
\.
- D�
— —
LI
1S 1VIOU3MOO F-
ZM
O
i �� I Z� j r� I ZW00
C9
ZWm �m F tea,
d 0 J O N I N W W N
a-m _ K V m N UlIX ' Z OL��
vi wiv' 1 la
MM' mac. d •Q z M
v �w I
0It
1 O I I I I I
d/0 tl — _ * • I is anH1 av
'� d— _ — — 00+99Ld
— —
z
z
j Ji�1 IM
\\\\ `wi1 w �Ol , . �t I c� : l - - f _F w
Ldx oIx d a w
E R
aF-o mm _ �� it DIII t a
aQm - a-zv z1 11= Wma:
I �4� it I 1AkoV)t` a
-- +-fiCt,7+ - I t- - =N��
1S 3V31N3389
�A ti
\ e0
0 �+Ci
\ • In I in IO Ill
~ \ 1 N O— O c0 F4 O CMin
J >
It
in InOl toN fl
11 11 11 11 11 It 11 II
in to 1
toP) M O m m w
Q O1 \ , \ U
1in
± N m in n + � I , D_
4F-
0I 11 O 0 OO
K Or 1 +i� j �'Mr 3 aQw �v~iin
F~lir
w w •, 3O inn J 1; Z ZZ]90
wll _ •Mo0E-�aa00
Z1CO
F- F II Np W I w \NYj 1 �` Q W N 0 Owc
+
- F- VI F_ in I • I�K v1 F- ~NO_N =N3 O_' p\ n o0 3Q�Q ��" on _� \
+o - 1S IU3dnd
F- i
1S 1 a3dna 00 01'fl m f �I
N I 1 to i• Q 3 U w 0
,cZL` 1 i-40
T �o�
w r I �blll� Qaw��Ln
0w I 330 N J n z Z a5Ln
W_wwaw<C3%F-
a.
Exhibit A=5 I _ � ~ J a
N O
White Settlement Schematic Of >
l
Sheet 2of2 i ' _� � Lr a �
+
&V)
----
1S ta3dna
0
Ito
J 1-
1S ia3dna 0060 LO
—� iI•
CO
FN- ¢c�i { •LI ILIIII
+ v- zz_
~faL aciw�-wWWJ3
�
m
ir tn—
�
LU
I----_—JJ
G)
+W�p O 00 0 C5 F_in
I zw=
wma
v
o �I fi � I
� CD
LIJ
I I NI
aJ
LO
W m I U � IM
I �` ;� I
--- I I F r'-- w -
uj
I
= + J N
a m u O I w+aI woLn
I 00 o I I o l! N =dog maces
' o m1 =
wrO I I a IL - -I -
J o01+oi -
OLT
is �dioav .ee- -F :se -.ei .o- Ln
LnI
_J
�I II kD J Ln Q o I i
— — — — — —` N _
m10 ---3 0 1--�--J
J�o I CrO I ' II Z m I I
- a n °+°
<Z� 1<Z- ---~ - 1-----J
OMCO, 13L0 I II rn w 0.� I I
Z J Q Z J O I O W a
ate°+' IZ�+
W� I W in t I I °O
OFF wW� I' O —
Wo_y 1Z=� I - �_ - - J
3 (J� W 3 Cij
J O J K O
-j
3r-"' I I T CO zoo I I
Z MLn I O ZJO II
w I L — —
a FJO I
Ld Ld [z
r: m n
amN Plitt -5i O -
-- -I-- 19 - -----I-- LQ
I 1S N30VA
1S H33VA
U •
a O
f o ZW I �N O�MI o + N
OmFTz + UO M W+W
CLn QIOOlN
W V1- .. .. d >
mc.iNZW N(.ZO
1 l AlsO
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
1. Compensation
A. The total maximum compensation to the ENGINEER shall be $337641201.00 for
all phases, as described below and as shown in Exhibits "B-3A" and "13-313".
B. Phases 1 through 4, Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main
Street Bridges, and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge: The
ENGINEER shall be compensated a total lump sum fee of $3,658,951.00,
Payment of the total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the
services described in Attachment A and Exhibit "A-2" for all labor materials,
supplies, and equipment necessary to complete the project.
C. Phases 5, .Henderson Street Bridge Construction Phase: For Phase 5, the'
ENGINEER shall be compensated for hourly charges and expenses, with a total
not -to -exceed fee of $105,250.00, Payment of the total invoiced fee shall be
considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment A and
Exhibit "A-2" for all labor materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to
complete the project.
The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Exhibit "B-1"
Section 1 -Method of Payment. Each invoice is to be verified as to its accuracy
and compliance with the terms of this contract by an officer of the ENGINEER.
II. Schedule
Scope of services shall be completed in accordance with the schedule that will be
developed in accordance with Attachment "D."
3 Attachment B and Exhibits.doc
B-1
EXHIBIT "1:5-1"
METHOD OF PAYMENT
(Supplement to Attachment B)
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
Method of Payment
A. Phases 1 through 4, Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main
Street Bridges, and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge: Partial payment
shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon City's approval of an invoice from
the ENGINEER outlining the estimated current percent complete of the total
project.
B. Phase 5, Henderson Street Bridge Construction Phase: Partial payment
shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon CITY'S approval of an invoice
from the ENGINEER outlining the hourly labor costs and reimbursable expenses
incurred. Hourly labor costs shall be based on employee rates multiplied by the
labor multipliers specified in Exhibit "13-2". Direct expenses shall be reimbursed
at actual cost times a multiplier of 1.05. Reimbursable expenses include printing
and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and
subsistence, and other miscellaneous expenses directly related to the work,
including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and other work required to be done
by independent persons other than staff members.
II. Progress Reports
A. The ENGINEER shall submit to the designated representative of the Director of
the Department of Transportation and Public Works monthly progress reports
covering all phases of design in the format required by the City.
B. If ENGINEER determines in the course of making design drawings and
specifications that the opinion of probable construction cost as established by the
City's construction budget will be exceeded, whether by change in the scope of
the project, increased cost or other conditions, the ENGINEER shall immediately
report such fact to the City's Director of the Department of Transportation and
Public Works and, if so instructed by the Director of the Department of
Transportation and Public Works shall suspend all work hereunder.
3 Attachment B and Exhibits.doc
B1-1
EXHIBIT "13-2"
LABOR MULTIPLIER SCHEDULES
(Supplement to Attachment B)
Design Services for
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
CONSULTANT LABOR MULTIPLIER
Freese and Nichols, Inc. 3.36
Rosales +Partners, Inc. 3.17
Civil Structures, Inc. 3.05
Open Channels Group, LLC 3.00
Blanton and Associates, Inc. 2.59
Savant Group, Inc. 2.97
Multatech Engineering, Inc. 2.81
Cowen Engineering 2.84
AECOM USA Group, Inc. 3.05
Camp Dresser &McKee, Inc. 3.15
EXHIBIT "B-3A"
(SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT "B")
Attachment A
Design Services for
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
anA 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
SUMMARY OF FEE BY BASIC AND EXTRA SERVICES
Proiect Construction Costs:
Design Fee:
Raw Construction
%Design this
%Raw Construction
%Total Construction
Costs*
Contract
Costs this Contract
Costs this Contract**
Henderson 16,075,375
100%
$
16,075,375
18,891,349
N Main 12,113,017
100%
$
12,113$017
14,942,933
White Settlement 15,1562785
30%
$
42547,035
5,9161259
43,345,177
76%
$
32,735,427
39,750,541
* Raw construction cost without contingency or escalation
** Includes contingency and escalation to equal $53.55M TRVA budget
of Raw % of Total
Fee Construction Construction
Basic services:
Design phase: $ 2,673,964 8.17%
6.73%
Construction administration: $
1052250
0.32%
$
2,779,214
8.49%
6.99%
Extra services*** $
488,483
1.49%
1.23%
31267,697 9.98%
8.22%
Preliminary studies**** $ 496,505 1.5270 1.2570
Total:
***Extra Services
3,764,201 11.50%
9.47%
121%
Landscape architecture and irrig. For $3.7M of landscaping (includes hardscape) $ 238,991
Agency coordination TxDOT USACE TRWD, FWWR, FWPA, S+V $ 60,000
Geotechnical No borings just more tests $ 55,000
Environmental and coordination with former team AECOM to finish environ., general coordination $ 36,573
Reproduction Printing boards plan sets etc. $ 26,009
TRVA meetings 36 meetings $ 22,000
City meetings during design $ 201000
TOOT environmental Meet, review CE, nothing else $ 12,000
SWPPP Storm water pollution prevention plan $ 71200
Survey Additional survey needed for railroad Exh 'A" $ 62920
Accessibility review TAS/ADA reviews $ 31790
$ 488,483
****Preliminary Studies
Aesthetic bridge design studies Beyond typical conceptual design efforts $ 234,505
Investigate multiple bridge options Beyond Typical conceptual design efforts $ 115 000
Stakeholder workshops and CAC meetings Presentations graphics entire team $ 251000
Hydraulic analyses CDM $ 28,000
Wallfbridge study Economize current wall design $ 12,000
Stakeholder meetings for input Fourmeetings $ 12,000
Open house meetings Limited team involvement $ 31,000
Coordinate hardscape elements For various bridge options $ 11,000
Renderings Of final bridge only $ 28,000
$ 496,505
Consulting Firm Responsihility
Freese and Nichols PM
Freese and Nichols Civil
Freese
and
Nichols
Struclurel
Freese
and
Nichols
Storm waterNBlities
Freese and
Freese and
Nichols
Nichols
Inigation
Landscape Arch
Freese and
Nichols
Construction services
Freese and
Nichols
Expenses
Freese and
Nichols
Sub markups (5%)
Subtotal
M/WBE Sub -consultants
Rosales
+Partners Bddge architecture
Civil Structures, Inc. Bridge substructural design
Open Channels Group Public involvement
Mas Tek Geotechnical
Gonondona Survey
Associates -Environmental
Savant Group Traffic contrcl and signals
Multatech Electrical, mist CAD
Accessology Accessibility review
Johns Sons Reproduction
Subtotal
Non•MMBESnb-consultants
Corven Engineedng Bddge structural design
AECOM CoordinationlEnvironmental
CDM Hydraulics
Subtotal
Total
EXHIBIT "B•3B"
(SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT "B")
Design Services for
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
SUMMAP.Y OF FEES BY TEAM MEMBERS
Design Phase
Construction Phase
Prelim
30% Hand
100% Hand
100% N Main
30% WS
Henderson
Main
Phase 1A
Phase 1B
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
Phase 6
103,661
224114
1153000
95,0o0
15,000
15,732
-
32,273
41,721
308,057
260,000
40,000
17,454
-
9,745
289010
372,882
378,239
40,000
50,311
31143
15,659
12,520
22,433
13,763
2,357
-
20,000
16,000
950
11,000
16,885
87,356
77,419
17,013
3,367
-
56809
29112
51674
5,674
29112
-
-
6,071
15,864
44,496
41,535
'15,730
1,429
-
15,372
41204
239171
20,119
800
650
-
189,072
160s000
146,568
989,157
20,000
916,420
20,000
144,419
92,250
-
-
12,000
401000
180,000
160,000
-
50000
23,000
4,000
4,000
-
-
27,500
27,500
6,920
74,040
45,000
15,000
4,000
139g992
129,992
4,900
11895
11895
2,432
577
12,000
10,000
1,000
-
197,432
90,Oo0
472497
459,427
398,387
16,000
13,000
-
36,573
20,000
41000
41000
-
110,000
496,505
36,573
230,638
41000
114523583
4,000
11318,806
-
160,419
-
1059250
Design Phase
(Lump Sum)
Constructlo
n Phase
(Cost•Plus)
Total Fee
Percent of
Contract
350,776
151732
366,507
9.7%
6B20051
17,454
699,505
18.6%
828,876
60$11
879,187
23.4%
67,519
21357
690876
1.9%
36,000
950
36,950
1.0%
209,673
3,367
213,040
5.7%
21,380
219380
0.6%
125,696
13429
127,125
3.4%
63,666
650
64,316
1.7%
21385,636
92 1250
21477,886
65.8%
200,000
200,000
5.3%
3923000 5,000
397,000
10.5%
31,000
31,000
0.8%
55,000
55,000
1.5%
6,920
6,920
0.2%
0.0%
134,040
41000
1389040
3.7%
269,983
4,000
273,963
7.3%
3,790
3,790
0.1
26,009
26,009
0.7 %
1,118,742
13,000
1,131,742
30.1%
90,000
90,000
2.4%
36,573
36,573
1.0%
28,000
28,000
0.7%
164,573 -
154,573
4.1%
3,658,951 105,250 3,7649201 100%
�_ � _
-. ..
Client: City of Fort Worth
Project: TRV Bridges -Design
City Project No.: 00144
FNI Project Manager: JFD
Projecf Phase
Discipline
1A: Prelim eval
�✓ 14%
1B: 30% Hend
❑� 6%
2: 100% Hend
❑� 40%
3: 100% NM
❑✓ 36%
4: 30% WS
� 4%
TOTAL FEE
Percent
of Total
Project Mgmt
$103,661
$22,114
$115,000
$95,000
$15,000
$350,775
9.6%
Tiansportation/Inf
$32,273
$41,721
$308,057
$260,000
$40,000
$682,051
18.6%
Structural
$9,745
$28,010
$372,882
$378,239
$40,000
$828,876
22.7%
Storm Water/Utilities
$3,143
$15,659
$12,520
$22,433
$13,763
$67,519
1.8%
Irrigation
$20,ODD
$16,000
$36,000
1.0%
Landscape Arch
$11,000
516,885
$87,356
$77,419
$17,013
$209,673
5.7%
Construct Services
$5,809
$2,112
$5,674
$5,674
$2,112
$21,380
0.6%
Subconsultanfs
$322,804
$88,274
5486,598
$422,506
$16,800
$1,336,981
36.5%
Expenses
$8,071
$15,864
$44,496
$41,535
515,730
$125,696
3.4%
TOTALS
$496,505
$230,638
$1,452,583
$1,318,806
$160,419
$3,658,951
100.0°/
Phase 1 Fee: $727,143
C:1Documenfs
and SettingsyfdlDesktop\TRV Bridges on
laptop\Fee proposallProposal
10-30-09\F�chibit B� fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09, S�ammry
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
11/12/2009, 1:55 PM
O
N
m
a'
M
tD
a
W
[t
W
d'
3
O
O
tD
W
t0
N
O
O
O
O
W
W
O
co
N
n
NN
V
N
%;t
m
OU
t")
64
4
�
�
fA
nj
rM
EA
fA
V3
fA
M
A
V
�
aW
p
N
M
N
00'
<t
<t
d'
M
N
M
z
N
mtn
M
W
tD
cl,
d'
tD
mM
d'
Q
tD
r
W
N
M
W
O
M
N
tD
r
W
O
N
M
a
fA
fA
f9
M
m
t0
C
EA
V
EA
N
fA
EA
W
M
EA
E9
EA
fA
3
o
o
W
0
O
W
O
o
0
o
M
a
Z
W
M
M
N
U)
t0
O_
W
NM
r
W
�-
C
O
N
N
U
t`
a
FA
N
fA
W
vJ
N
F
M
W
N
.K
0
co
`t
W
M
K
7
d'
d'
M
V
M
z
0)
W
p,
m
t0
M
W
W
MN
'd'
tDmv
fD
O
W
h
W
t0
M
tD
O
W
`
W
N
m
N
OJ
E9
V
fA
fA
M
V
O
'L
fA
d:
EA
N
EA
fA
EA
fA
EA
V3
EA
�
a
3
O
O
W
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
<t
0
b
tD
M
M
N
to
ED
O
W
N
N
m
O
O
N
N
a
EA
�
V)
�-
fA
M
qt
o
U
r
fA
d'
E9
N
fA
E9
EA
m
C
o
g
f»
f»
EA
fA
F
(�
j
WOd.
M
7
O
V
v
V'
V
m
M
6
f0'I
m
0
OIN
N
m
V
MN
[F
toa
W
W
tD
M
r
N
N
to
O
W
W
tD
O
W
fA
tD
fA
�
Vi
rM�
W
�
O
fA
EA
�
;
a
aC
O
tD
u)
N
O
O
M
N
3 N
l
N
v�
cWo
m
EA
f»
EA
MfA
to
;
m
a0
m
C
O
O
O
O
O
p
n
M
N
W
p
N
m
z
f0
O
M
N
V
W
a
M
N
a
<
Q
tD
M
N
N
W
O
W
N
W
m
M
tD
t
O
W
N
tD
fA
fi3
W
m<
EA
fri
b9
ff)
V3
fA
EA
Oj
c.,
CO
fA
EA
f
3
61
M
t f)
O
N
O
O
O
O
W
M
N
a
t
N
W
N
t`w
MN
f
E
y
W
U)
M_W�O
U
of
EA
fA
fA
U)
EA
f9
N
<
EA
fti
E
0.
3
m
tY.
Q
�
W
M
j
O
N
D
�0
V'
et
V
M
NNM�
c
mom
1
Z
W
N
Y
O
O
O
O
3
+C'
L
F
..
0
to
omo0oo00
0
o
Woo0
to
10
t�
0w
In
W
M
0
0
O
Ott000
O
N
U)
N
l
in
t`
O
to
fri
to
O
a
W
0
6
0
�a°°o
ofa�MEA
N»
fr'fr'v3
v`t
i»sNs
iA
iA
'C
fA
iA
En
d
�
n
c
c
aQ
E
O
o
C
c
c
w
Z
n
is
v
O
v
tt3
0
axi
c
v
cc0�
O
°�Q
O
o-w
to
aioo
om
0or
aaio
o
.Oc
U
mc)2mU)rxa
U
0
f,_
n
W
W
m
N
t❑VV
z
N
N
.Oja
s)soO BMIMUd
spoo paudap iasn
�alyndwoo
O
m
OWi
�
N
O
9
V)
Fee}A
msT
V
O
N
M
S
N
a
9EA
fA
D
N
�
V
N
W
-a
fA
i rnlo
i MfA w
O
N
N
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
W
tD
d'
t`
Illt�
m
V
In
O
t0
0
M
N
�-
00
O
M
r
M
01
d'
O
N
r
t%:
tp
M
V
W
fD
diN
m
M
NE9
J
O
O
O
M
h
O
<T
M
W
O
O
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
0
N
ti
y
0
t0
O
m
O
r
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
N
IS
'7
Oi
N
M
W
O
O
-
f0
t0
O
mM
NmOM
Nkq
m
�H
�ONtli
ER
fR
fA
4A
NN
D
Q
O
O
�
n
o
u)
EA
3
0
0
0
M
y
O
O
O
O
V
U
N
Ill
O
N
N
O
N
N
'md
w
In
1pa0
In
r�m0
N
Ni
:vo
IN
3
a
E9
fA
O
o
N
o
In
0
O
O
O
O
00
OmNOmO-0
000
�N
VK
aW
M
3
O
V
N
N
N
O
N
0
O
O
0
0
0
o
vrnr-m0
Ooo
t�mWrnt�
oNW
O
W
V
IN
fA
Vi
�
<»
fA
fA
F
N
3
m
n
tm+)
N
SEA
NIA
O
r
fPr
r-
FA
fA
fA
Q0o
ottOD
i
fA�16
T
�4M9
m
Z
3
0
M
h
0
M
O
N
N
m
O
O
t0
�
0 '
F
1
O
000
0
Ot00
O�
In
N
1
;gam
N
NM
d€
O
N0)mIN
1
40)
�
N
O
OOOO
fNfyy
1
O
N
0
0
0
m
N
t
�
�
f
f
�
F
ti
M
ti
c
N
N
O
W
U
O
L
O
C
O
U
G
fq
w
O
N
O
U
G
jim,�l
N
L
OCI
cooQmtgl
Qf�.)U
RO'O�CoJ
Z�Nm%;t
tD
t�
Wmo�NM
tp
M
N
M
M
N
fl
A
n
IN
A
3
0
9
3
V
9
0
9
Protect Mgmt
By: JFD
Chk'd:
$350,775
40 sheets
Phase
Task
No.
Task Description
Hours
CAD Hours
Cost
Group Manager
Engineer fi
CaddApp(ica6on
Malys! �
Raw
With
Multiplier
)ohn F. Dewar
v
Nez Ivan Garoa
v
word Procesor
v
�
David 1. Thom ®
566.81
$32.60
520.00
536.94
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Internal project kick-off mlg
16.0
24.0
$1,851
$5,934
3
Obtain/review rojecl
data
12.0
12.0
12.0
16.0
52,024
$6,487
4
Project kick-off mtg w/City
4.0
4.0
$398
$1,274
5
City/stakeholder/team tour
8.0
8.0
$795
$2,549
6
Initial
stakeholder input mtgs
12.0
12.0
$1,193
53,823
7
Public relations strateg dev't
4.0
$267
$856
8
Determine other data required
6.0
8.0
$662
$2,121
9
Attend 18 TRVA meetings
54.0
53,608
$11,563
10
Setup accounting
8.0
8.0
$795
$2,549
11
PM re orting
8.0
12.0
$926
$2,967
�
12
Evaluate technical as ects
24.0
$1,603
$5,139
C
13
Multiple design o bons rep
24.0
16.0
16.0
$2,445
$7,836
14
Order -of -magnitude cost est's
12.0
16.0
$1,323
$4,241
Q
15
Graphically illustrate designs
16.0
16.0
8.0
$1,886
$6,045
16
Review mtg w/City
4.0
6.0
$463
$1,483
17
Slakeholdenvorksho
16.0
8.0
$1,330
$4,262
18
Coordinate team
30.0
24.0
$2,787
56,931
19
Prepare CAC presentation
32.0
16.0
24.0
$3,546
$11,365
20
Interim design options prep
16.0
$1,069
$3,426
21
Orderof-magnitude cost est's
12.0
$802
$2,569
22
Graphically illustrate designs
16.0
16.0
32.0
$2,571
$8,240
SUBTOTALS
334.0
190.0
44.0
80.0
$32,344
510$661
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
C
2
Coordinate plans
12.0
4.0
$932
$2,987
Z
3
AssembleTxDOTsubmittal
2.0
8.0
$394
$1,264
4
Attend 2 TRVA meetings
12.0
$602
$2,569
M
5
Team management
40.0
40.0
$3,976
512,744
6
PM reporting
8.0
8.0
$795
$2,549
00
SUBTOTALS
74.0
60.0
58,900
$22,114
1
Dreftin b sheet, in ut below
2
Team meetings
34.8
34.8
34.8
$4,740
$15,193
3
City meetings
34.8
17.4
$2,889
$9,261
4
TxDOT meetings
20.9
20.9
$2,074
$6,646
5
PM re orting
17.4
$1,161
$3,722
6
Respond to TxDOT comments
17.4
86.9
34.8
$5,279
$16,920
'a
7
Coordinate team (26 weeks)
113.0
$7,549
$24,194
y
8
Assemble submittals
26.1
52.2
52.2
$5,369
$17,206
Z
9
Resolve design issues
52.2
69.5
55,751
$18,432
ego°
10
Attend 5 TRVA meetings
16.0
$1,069
$3,426
N
SUBTOTALS
332.4
281.6
f2f.7
$35,882
$115,000
1
Drafting
by sheet, input below
2
Team meetings
28.6
28.6
28.6
$3,900
$12,499
3
City meetings
28.6
14.3
$2,377
$7,618
�
2
4
TxDOT meetin s
17.2
17.2
$1,706
55,468
5
PM reporting
14.3
$955
$3,062
�o0
6
Respond to TxDOT comments
14.3
71.5
28.6
$4,343
$13,919
.-
7
Coordinate team (26 weeks)
93.0
56,210
$19,904
8
Assemblesubmiitals
21.5
42.9
42.9
$4,417
$14,155
9
Resolve design issues
42.9
57.2
$4,731
$15,163
10
Attend 5 TRVA meetings
15.0
51,002
$3,212
SUBTOTALS
275.3
231.7
100.1
$29,641
$95,000
1
Drafting b sheet, in ut below
2
Coordinate plans
8.3
2.8
$644
52,064
3
AssembleTxDOTsubmittal
1.4
5.5
$272
$873
4
Attend 2 TRVA meetings
7.0
$468
$1,499
5
Team management
27.6
27.6
$2,747
$8,804
3
6
PM
re orting
5.5
5.5
5549
57,761
O
M
eh
SUBTOTALS
GRAND TOTALS
49.8
1085.5
41.4
804.7
44.0
301.8
54,680
$109,447
$15,000
$350,775
C:\Documents and Settings\jfdlDesktop\TRV
Bridges on
laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09, Dsc1
Freese and Nichols, Inc. �
11/12/2009, 1:55 PM
Transportationllnf $682,051
By: MAM 186 sheets
Chk'd: JFD
C:\Documents and Settings\jfd\Deskfop\TRV Bridges on lapfop\Fee proposaN'roposal 1030-09\6chibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown - 1030-09, Dsc2
Freese and Nichols, Inc. 11l12/2009, 1:55 PM
N
cYi
37
Retaining Wall Standards
2.1
2.1
$159
$508
38
H
draulidH drolo is Data
2.1
2.1
$159
$508
39
Scour Sheet
2.1
2.1
$159
$508
40
Culvert La outs -All Types - Br
2.1
2.1
$159
5508
41
Draina a Plan &Profile Sheets
2.1
2.1
$159
5508
42
Oralnage Standards
2.1
2.1
$159
$508
43
Exislin Utili Plan & Profile S
2.1
2.1
$159
$508
44
Pro osed Utility Plan &Profile
2.1
2.1
$159
5508
45
Utili
Standards
2.1
2.1
$159
5508
46
Bridge Hydraulic Data
2.1
8.4
$337
$1,081
47
Bridge Layout
16.8
33.6
$1,746
$5,594
48
Detailed Bridge Summaries
2.1
2.1
$159
5508
49
Structural Details
2.1
2.1
$159
$508
50
Traffic Si nal Layout
2.1
2.1
5159
$508
51
Traffic Standarrs
2.1
2.1
5159
$508
52
Illumination layout
2.1
2.1
$159
5508
53
Illumination Summa
Z.1
2.1
$159
$508
54
Illumination Standards
2.1
2.1
$159
5508
55
Si nin La out
8.4
33.6
51,349
54,324
56
Signing Standards
4.2
4.2
$317
$1,017
57
Pavement Markin
La out
16.8
33.6
$1,746
$5,594
58
Pavement Markin Summary
8.4
16.8
$873
52,797
59
Pavement Marking Standards
4.2
4.2
5317
$1,017
60
SW3P Layout
4.2
16.8
$675
$2,162
61
SW3P Summa
2.1
4.2
5218
5699
62
SW3P Standards
2.1
4.2
5218
5699
63
EPIC Sheet
4.2
8.4
5436
$1,399
64
S ecifications
84.0
84.0
$6,346
520,339
65
ConsWction Cost Estimate
33.6
33.6
52,538
$8,136
66
Review Meetin w/ CFW
8.4
8.4
5635
52,034
SUBTOTALS
864.0
1,333.9
570.0
596,119
$308,057
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
464.2
514,270
545,733
2
Coordinate with Utilites
14.3
14.3
51,077
53,453
3
Coordinate with Utilities
14.3
14.3
$1,077
$3,453
4
Verify Ri ht of Wa Re uireme
7.1
14.3
$741
$2,374
5
Coordinate with Utilities
14.3
14.3
$1,077
$3,453
6
Geotech Stud /Pavement Desi
14.3
14.3
$1,077
$3,453
7
Coordinate with Dmina a
28.5
28.5
$2,155
56,906
8
Coordinate with Landscape
28.5
28.5
52,155
$6,906
9
Coordinate with Bridge
28.5
28.5
$2,155
$6,906
10
Coordinate with TCP(i'mffidlllu
42.8
42.8
�
53,232
510,359
11
Coordinate with Walis
28.5
28.5
52,155
56,906
12
Coordinate with TxDOT
28.5
28.5
52,155
$6,906
13
Title Sheet
3.6
7.1
5370
51,187
14
Index
3.6
7.1
$370
$1,187
15
Pro'ectLa
out
7.1
14.3
$741
$2,374
16
Typical Sections
28.5
42.8
52,559
58,202
17
General Notes
28.5
28.5
$2,155
56,906
18
Estmate and Quan' Sheets
14.3
28.5
$1,482
$4,749
19
Consolidated
Summades
14.3
26.5
51,482
$4,749
20
TCP T pical Sections
1.8
1.8
5135
5432
21
TCP Phase Narrative
1.8
1.8
5135
$432
22
TCP Phase Layouts
1.8
1.8
$135
5432
23
Tem ovary Traffic Si oats, Illu
1.8
1.8
5135
$432
24
TCP Summary
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
25
TCP Standards
1.8
1.8
$135
5432
26
Roadwa Alignment Data Shee
7.1
14.3
$741
$2,374
27
Roadway Plan &Profile Sheets
28.5
71.3
$3,368
$10,793
28
Intersection Details
28.5
71.3
$3,368
$10,793
29
Drivewa Details
14.3
28.5
$1,462
$4,749
30
Miscellaneous Details
14.3
14.3
$1,077
53,453
31
Roadwa Cross -Sections
28.5
71.3
$3,368
$10,793
32
Roadway Summary
14.3
28.5
$1,482
$4,749
33
Roadwa Standards
3.6
7.1
$370
$1,187
34
Retainin Wall
La outs
7.1
28.5
51,145
$3,670
35
Retainin WaII Plan & Profile S
7.1
28.5
$1,145
$3,670
36
Retaining Wall Details
1.8
1.8
$135
5432
37
Retainin Wall
Standards
1.6
1.8
$135
5432
38
H
draulirJH
drologic Data
1.6
1.8
$135
$432
39
Scour Sheet
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
40
Culvert La outs - All T es - 8
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
41
Oraina a Plan &Profile Sheets
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
42
Drainage Standards-
1.8
1.8
5135
5432
43
Existin Utili Plan & Profile S
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
44
Pro osed Utili Plan &Profile
1.8
1.8
$135
5432
45
Ulili Standards
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
46
Bridge Hydraulic Data
1.8
7.1
$286
$918
47
Bridge Layout
14.3
28.5
$1,482
$4,749
48
Detailed Brid a Summades
1.8
1.8
5135
5432
49
SWciural Details
1.8
1.8
5135
5432
50
Traffic Si nal Layout
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
51
Traffic Standards
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
52
Illumination La out
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
53
Illumination Summa
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
54
Illumination Standards
1.8
1.8
$135
$432
55
Signing La out
7.1
28.5
$1,145
$3,670
56
Si ning Standards
3.6
3.6
$269
$863
57
Pavement Markin La out
14.3
28.5
$1,482
$4,749
58
Pavement Marking Summa
7.1
14.3
$741
$2,374
59
Pavement
Markin
Standards
3.6
3.6
5269
$863
60
SW3P Layout
3.6
14.3
$573
$1,835
61
SW3P Summa
1.8
3.6
$185
5594
62
SW3P Standards
1.8
3.6
5185
5594
63
EPIC Sheet
3.6
7.1
5370
$1,187
64
S ecificafions
71.3
71.3
$5,387
517,265
65
Construction Cost Estimate
28.5
28.5
$2,155
$6,906
C:1Documents and SetfingsljfdlDesktop\TRV
Bridges on
laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit
B-4 fee summary and breakdown - 10-30-09, Dsc2
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
11/12/2009, 1:55 PM
66
Review Meeting w/ CFW
7.1
7.1
$539
51,726
67
Public
Meetin
3.6
3.6
5269
$863
68
Exhibits for Public Meeting
14.3
21.4
$1,280
$4,101
69
Misc. Su porting Bid Documen
3.6
7.1
$370
51,187
70
SWPPP in specs
35.7
$1,011
53,239
SUBTOTALS
734.4
1,135.5
464.2
$81,124
$260,000
1
2
Drafting b sheet, in ut below
Title Sheet
1.3
5.3
194.5
55,979
$213
$19,163
$683
3
4
5
Exist. and Prop. T .Sect.
Prelim. Summary Sheets
ConVol Data Sheets
2.7
2.7
1.3
5.3
2.7
2.7
$276
$200
$138
$883
$642
$442
6
Plan and Profile Sheets
10.6
10.6
5802
$2,569
7
Prelim.
Intersection La outs
2.7
10.6
5426
$1,365
8
Prelim.
Traffic Control
Pian
10.6
10.6
$802
$2,569
9
10
Draina eAreaMaps
H draulic Com utations
2.7
1.3
10.6
10.6
$426
5363
$1,365
$1,165
0
�''�
11
Prelim. Culvert
Layouts
1.3
10.6
5363
$1,165
12
13
Updated Cost Estimate
Existin Utilities La out
2.7
1.3
5.3
10.6
5276
5363
5863
$1,165
14
15
Bridge La out
Retainln Wall Layout ?
5.3
2.7
10.6
10.6
5551
$426
$1,766
51,365
16
17
Specifications
Coordina0on tviih Subs
5.3
5.3
10.6
2.7
$551
5326
51,766
$1,043
SUBTOTALS
59.7
130.0
194.5
$12,481
$40,000
GRAND TOTALS
1792.9
2813.5
1575.3
5212,811
$882,051
Input sheet titles, numbers, and hours to drak:
Sheet Title
Sheet No.
CAD Drafting Hours by Phase
1A: Prelim eval
18: 30% Hend
2: 100% Hend
3: 100% NM
4: 30% WS
1
Title Sheet
1
8.0
11.0
8.8
5.9
2
Index
1
8.0
11.0
17.6
5.9
3
Pro'ect La out
2
16.0
22.0
17.6
11.8
4
5
T pica) Sections
General Notes
2
10
8.0
22.0
6.0
4.8
17.6
5.9
6
Estimate and Quanti
4
8.0
22.0
17.6
5.9
7
Consolidated Summaries
4
8.0
22.0
1.6
5.9
8
TCP T ical
Sections
2
16.0
2.0
1.6
11.8
9
TCP Phase
Narrative
2
2.0
i.6
10
TCP Phase La outs
8
8.0
2.0
i.6
5.9
11
12
Temporary Traffic Si oats, Illu
TCP Summary
2
1
8.0
8.0
2.0
2.0
1.6
1.6
5.9
5.9
13
TCP Standards
10
16.0
2.0
17.6
11.8
14
15
16
Roadway Alignment Data Shee
Roadway Plan 8 Profile Sheets
Intersection Details
4
8
5
16.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
17.6
17.6
17.6
11.8
17
Orivewa Details
2
22.0
17.6
18
Miscellaneous
Details
2
8.0
22.0
26.4
5.9
19
_.
Roadwa Cross -Sections
20
16.0
33.0
8.8
1.8
20
Roadwa Summa
1
32.0
11.0
8.8
23.6
21
Roadwa Standards
20
11.0
17.6
22
Retaining Wall La outs
4
32.0
22.0
17.6
23.6
23
Retaining Wall Plan
& Profile S
8
22.0
1.6
24
25
26
27
Retaining Wall Details
Retaining Wall Standards
Hydreulic/Hydrologic Data
Scour Sheet
2
10
1
1
24.0
24.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
11.0
1.6
1.6
8.8
1.6
17.7
17.7
28
Culvert
La outs - All T pes -Bridge
Class
2.0
1.6
29
30
Drainage Plan &Profile Sheets
Draina a Standards
2.0
2.0
1.6
4.8
31
Existin Utility Plan &Profile Sheets
6.0
4.8
32
Pro osed Utili Plan &Profile Sheets
6.0
1.6
33
U81i Standards
2.0
8.8
34
35
36
37
Bddge H draulic Data
Bridge Layout
Detailed Bridge Summades
SWctural Details
2
2
11.0
22.0
2.0
2.0
17.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
38
Traffic Si naI Layout
2.0
1.6
39
Traffic Standards
2.0
1.6
40
Illumination
La out
2.0
1.6
41
Illumination Summa
2.0
1.6
42
Illumination Standards
2.0
57.6
43
44
45
Si ning La out
Si ning Standards
Pavement Markin La out
� 4
10
4
22.0
11.0
22.0
8.8
17.6
8.8
46
Pavement Markin Summa
1
11.0
8.8
47
Pavement
Marking
Standards
10
11.0
17.6
48
SW3P
La out
4
22.0
8.8
49
SW3P Summa
1
11.0
8.8
50
SW3P Standards
5
11.0
8.8
51
EPIC Sheet
1
11.0
13.6
52
Exhibits for Public Meetin
5
17.0
17.0
186
Total Drafting Hours: ztia.0 aro.0 woa.c rn4.a
C:\Documents and Seitings\jfdlDesktoplTRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-091Exhibit 8-4 fee summary and breakdown - 10-30-09, Dsc2
Freese and Nichols, Inc. 11/12I2009, 1:55 PM
Structural
By: VBK
Chk'd: JFD
$828,876
84 sheets
Hours
CAD Hours
Cost
Engkr V
Englleerl
EnghtwW
S,~W
Tedvddw IV
w/th
Task
Peter Kau
Hwnsik tAoon
Mtonio Diaz
&ad Batley Wats
Julia A WhitaaR
Raw
Multiplier
Phew
No.
Task DesC t/on
$41.09
$28,73
$56,07
$51,18
$33.81
1
Drafing by sheet, Input below
2
Attend CAC meeting
2
$02
$263
,.
y
3
Meetings 2
12
$493
$1,580
C
4
Review Conceptual Designs
60
$24465
$7,902
SUBTOTALS
74
$4041
$91745
1
Drafting by sheet, Input below
__
202
$6,816
$21,845
2
Reviewing RW geotech report, coordinations
6
3
1
$389
$1,247
a
C
3
Reviewing RR geotech report, coordinations
3
1
1
$195
$623
i
4
Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bridge
4
2
1
$257
$823
5
Review CSI substructure drawings
2
3
0
$173
$555
M
6
Reviewing channel geotech report, coordinator
3
1
1
$195
$623
7
Coordinations with CSI on spliced girder bridge
6
3
1
$342
$1,096
c0
8
Review CSI
substructure drawings
6
3
1
$373
$1,197
SUBTOTALS
28
17
5
202
$8s740
$289010
1
DavOng b sheet, input below
1146
$38,729
$124,127
2
Reviewing RW geotech report, coordinations
6
3
1
$389
$1,247
3
Review wall layouts
28
6
$1,465
$4,694
4
Review CSI wall design and details
56
28
6
$3,419
$108959
5
Respond to 30% RW comments
1
3
1
$177
$568
6
Respond to 60% RW comments
1
6
1
$258
$826
7
Respond to 90% RW comments
1
3
1
$177
$568
8
Reviewing RR geotech report, coordinations
3
1
1
$195
$623
9
Railroad bridge geometry calculations
28
56
6
$3,073
$9,850
10
Railroad bridge beam design
28
56
3
$2,916
$9,347
11
RR Bridge deck design
3
8
1
$435
$1,394
12
Railroad bridge beam bearing pad design
3
6
$276
$884
13
Railroad bridge quantities estimate
17
28
6
$1,809
$5,797
14
Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bridge
35
20
5
$2,311
$7,408
15
Railroad bridge intemal QC
17
28
8
$1,943
$6,228
00
16
Review CSI substructure drawings
1s
28
3
$1,659
$4,996
0)
17
Respond to RR 30% comments
6
11
3
$709
$2,272
18
Respond to RR 60% comments
17
28
3
$11652
$5,294
19
Respond to RR 90% comments
6
11
1
$630
$2,020
0
20
Reviewing channel geotech report, coordinati
3
i
1
$195
$623
P
21
Spliced girder bridge geometry calculations
101
168
4
$91193
$29,463
N
22
Sliced girder bridge beam design
78
168
4
$86272
$2615113
23
Channel Bridge deck design
3
6
1
1 $315
$13010
24
Spliced girder bridge construction sequence
FP
56
4
$5,285
$16,937
25
Spliced girder bridgepost-tensioning design
168
112
4
$10,345
$33,156
26
Spliced girder bridge pot bearing design
17
11
6
$1,326
$43250
27
Spliced girder bridge quantities estimate
22
42
4
$2,351
$7,536
28
Coordinations with CSI on spliced girder bridge
50
25
5
$3,078
$9,863
29
Spliced girder bridge internal QC
28
45
16
$3,335
$10,68B
30
Review CSI substructure drawings
50
25
4
$3,019
$9,676
31
Respond to channel 30% comments
8
17
3
$985 1
$3,156
32
Respond to channel 60% comments
28
56
3
$2,916
$9,347
33
Respond to channel 90% comments
17
28
3
$1,652
$5,294
34
Meeting with fabricators and contractors
28
28
$19955
$6,266
35
External QC by Corven Engineering
SUBTOTALS
956
1112
114 1145 $1161345 $3721882
11/12/2009, 1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
C:\Documents and Settings\jidlDesklop\TRV
Bridges on
laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit
B-4 tee summary and breakdown - 10-30-09, Dsc3
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
1173
$39,645
$127,062
2
Reviewing RW geotech report, coordinations
2
2
1
$232
$745
3
Review wall layouts
29
6
$1,499
$4,805
4
Review CSI wall design and details
57
28
6
$3,481
$11,157
5
Respond to 30% RW comments
1
3
1
$185
$594
6
Respond to 60% RW comments
1
6
1
$264
$845
7
Respond to 90% RW comments
1
3
1
$181
$581
8
Reviewing RR geotech report, coordinations
3
1
1
$199
$638
9
Railroad bridge geometry calculations
29
57
6
$3,146
1 $10,083
10
Railroad bridge beam design
29
57
3
$2,985
$9156B
11
RR Bridge deck design
3
9
1
$445
$1,427
12
Railroad bridge beam bearing pad design
3
6
$282
$905
13
Railroad bridge quantities estimate
17
29
6
$1,852
$5,934
14
Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bride
36
21
5
$2,366
$7,583
15
Railroad bridge Internal QC
17
29
4 -
$1,754
$5,623
Rc
16
Review CSI substructure dram .n s
15
28
3
$1,596
$5,115
2
17
Respond to RR 30% comments
6
11
3
$726
$2,326
c
18
Respond to RR 60% comments
17
29
3
$1,691
$5,419
0
19
Respond to RR 90% comments
6
11
1 1
$645
$20068
20
Reviewing channel geotech report, coordinator
3
1
1
$199
$638
21
Spliced girder bridge geometry calculations
103
172
4
$9,405
$30,142
22
Spliced girder bride beam desi n
80
172
4
$B,463
$27,123
23
Channel Bridge deck design
3
6
1
$323
$12034
24
Spliced girder bridge construction sequence
86
57
4
$5,404
$17,321
25
Spliced girder bridge post4onsloning design
172
its
4
$10,584
$33,923
26
Spliced
girder bride pot bearing design
17
11
2
$1,148
$30680
27
Spliced girder bride quantities estimate
23
43
2
$29290
$7,338
28
Coordinations with CSI on spliced girder bride
52
26
2
$2,973 1
$9,529
29
Spliced girder bridge Internal QC
29
46
16
$3,392
$10,873
30
Review CSI substructure drawings
52
26
2
$2,973
$90529
31
Respond to channel 30% comments
9
17
3
$1,008
$3,231
32
Respond to channel 60% comments
29
57
3
$2,985
$9,568
33
Respond to channel 90% comments
17
29
3
$1,691
$5,419
34
Meeting with fabricators and contractors
29
29
$20001
$6,414
35
External QC by Corven Engineering
SUBTOTALS
975
1137 1
100
f173
;118,016
$374239
1
Drafting
by sheet, Input below
_
243
$8,230
$26,377
2
Reviewing RW geotech report, coordinations
12
6
3
$860
$2,756
3
Reviewing RR geotech report, coordinations
6
3
2
$430
$1,378
3
4
Coordinations with CSI on Railroad bridge
9
5
1
$568
$1,819
5
Review CSI substructure drawings
4
7
1 1
$383
$1,227
c6
Reviewing channel geotech report, coordination
6
3
2
$430
$1,378
7
Coordinations with CSI on spliced girder bridge
12
6
1
$756
$2,422
8
Review CSI substructure drawings
12
6
2
$825
$2,644
SUBTOTALS
62
37
12
243
$14481
0,000
GRAND TOTALS
2095
2302
231
2763
$258,622
$828 876
Input sheet fitles, numbers, and hours to draft:
SheetTltle
Sheet No.
CAD DraR/ng Houro by Phase
1A: Prelhuoval
1B: 30% Head
2: 100%Hend
3: 100%NM
4: 30%WS
1
EB ESTIMATED
QUANTITIES
1
7.7
T9
2
EB HENDERSON BRIDGE LAYOUT
3
67.2
69.2
70.9
81.1
3
EB HENDERSON TYPICAL SECTIONS
2
13.4
13.8
14.2
16.2
4
EB HENDERSON BORING DETAILS
3
20.2
20.8
21.3
24.3
5
EB HENDERSON
SEQ, OF CONSTRUCTION
2
38.5
39A
6
EB HENDERSON FRAMING PLAN
4
76.9
78.8
7
ES PRESTRESSED CONC U-BEAM DESIGN
1
5.8
5.9
8
EB PRESTRESSED CONC TY VI BEAM DESI
1
5.8
5.9
9
EB HENDERSON
POST -TENSIONING DETAII
2
38.5
39.4
10
EB PRECAST CONC TY VI BM DETAILS
4
123A
126.0
11
EB HENDERSON BEAM SPLICING DETAILS
2
38.5
39A
12
EB HENDERSON SLAB PLAN
4
92.3
94.5
13
EB HENDERSON SLAB TYPICAL SECTIONS
1
15A
15.8
14
EB HENDERSON DEFLECTION DIAGRAMS
2
38.5
39.4
WB ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
1
7.7
7.9
WB HENDERSON BRIDGE LAYOUT
3
67.2
69.2
70.9
81.1
WB HENDERSON TYPICAL SECTIONS
2
13A
13.8
14.2
16.2
WB HENDERSON BORING DETAILS
3
20.2
20.8
21.3
24.3
WB HENDERSON SEQ. OF CONSTRUCTION
2
76.9
78.8
WB HENDERSON FRAMING PLAN
4
5.8
5.9
WB PRESTRESSED CONC U-BEAM DESIGN1
1
5.8
5.9
WB PRESTRESSED CONC TY VI BEAM DESI
1
38.5
39.4
WB HENDERSON POST -TENSIONING DETAI
2
123A
126.0
WB PRECAST CONC TY VI BM DETAILS
4
38.5
39A
WB HENDERSON BEAM SPLICING DETAILS
2
92.3
94.5
WB HENDERSON SLAB PLAN
4
15.4
15.8
WB HENDERSON SLAB TYPICAL SECTIONS
1
38.5
39A
WB HENDERSON DEFLECTION
DIAGRAMS
2
4.8
4.9
84
20 TXDOT STANDARDS
1 20
9.6
Total Drafting Hours: 201.E 1145.5 1172.E 243.4
11/12/2009, 1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc. C:1Documents and Settingsljfd\DesMop\TRV
Bridges
on laptop\Fee
proposa�Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-4
fee summary and
breakdown - 10-30-09, Dsc3
Storm Water/Utilities
By: SKH
Chk'd: KDD
$671519
11 sheets
Phase
Task Description
Hours
CAD Hours
Coat
Task
No.
Engineer
Engineer
Englrnrerl
Terhnklan It
Raw
with
Multiplier
I Kelly Diane Dilla
$48.32
Scott KlnsoNing
$31,39
3ustin T. Oswald
$27,15
Bryan Keith eoyla
$21.90
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Assemble GIS data for team
1.0
16.0
16.0
$901
$23888
3
Attend kick-off
1.0
1.0
$80
$255
4
Attend stakeholder meetings
5
Evaluate three hydraulic options
v
6
Coordinate utilities
0.
7
Attend workshop
Q
8
Coordinate with CDM
i'
9
Prepare exhibits
SUBTOTALS
2.0
17.0
16.0
$981
$30143
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Drainage Areas
0.9
3A
9.4
6.B
$551
$1,765
3
Inlet & ROW Capacity Calcs
0.7
2.7
8.2
2.7
$399
$11280
®
C
4
Inlet and SD Demo
IA
1.4
5.4
$199
$637
5
P&P Sheets - Inlet Leads (4 loc
1.4
13.6
27.2
27.2
$1,827
$5,855
6
Storm Drain Extension on Hent
1 A
8.2
16.3
16.3
$1,122
$3,597
M
7
Flumes Adjacent to Walls
2.7
5.4
2.7
$293
$938
8
Temporary Drainage Structural
0.9
3A
3A
3A
$315
$18008
M
9
Details - Inlets, Manholes, Emb
0.2
1A
2.0
3A
$181
$579
10
Specs
11
Bridge Scour
SUBTOTALS
5.3
36.7
73.3
66.0
$4,866
$150659
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Drainage Areas
3
Inlet & ROW Capacity Calcs
0.2
0.7
2.0
0.7
$100
$320
C
4
Inlet and SD Demo
0.3
0.3
1.4
$50
$159
T
5
P&P Sheets - Inlet Leads
(4
loc
0.3
3.4
6.8
6.8
$457
$1,464
6
Storm Drain Extension on Hen
0.3
2.0
4.1
4A
$281
$899
®
7
Flumes Adjacent
to Walls
0.7
1A
0.7
$73
$234
e-
8
Temporary Drainage Structure
0.9
3A
3.4
3.4
$315
$15008
N
9
Details - Inlets, Manholes, Emb
1.5
12.2
18.4
30A
$1,627
$5,214
10
Specs
1.7
34.0
$10005
$30222
SUBTOTALS
4.9
22.8
70.4
47.6
$3,907
$12,520
1
Drafting by sheet, Input below
2
Drainage Areas
1.1
4.4
17.6
8.8
$862
$20762
3
Inlet & ROW Capacity Calcs
1.1
2.2
4A
2.2
$290
$929
4
Inlet and SD Demo
2.2
4A
2.2
$237
$759
2
5
P&P Sheets - Inlet Leads (4 l0
1.1
114.9
29.9
29.9
$1,987
$6,370
c
6
Storm Drain Extension on Hen
1.1
4.4
8A
8.8
$623
$1,996
0
7
Flumes Adjacent
to Walls
2.2
2.2
2.2
$177
$567
8
Temporary Drainage Structurei
0.9
3.7
3.7
3.7
$341
$1,093
en
9
Details - Inlets, Manholes, Emb
2.2
17.6
26.4
$10376
$4,409
10
Specs
1.9
37.4
$11107
$3,549
11
Bridge Scour
SUBTOTALS
9.4
51.6
134.8
57.8
$78000
$220433
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Drainage Areas
0.7
3.0
8.2
6.0
$484
$1,551
3
Inlet & ROW Capacity Calcs
0.6
2A
7.2
2.4
$351
$1,125
4
Inlet and SD Demo
1.2
1.2
4.8
$175
$560
5
P&P Sheets - Inlet Leads (4 loc
1.2
12.0
23.9
23.9
$1,606
$5,146
6
Storm Drain Extension on Hen
1.2
7.2
14.3
114.3
$986
$3,162
7
Flumes Adjacent
to Walls
2.4
4.8
2A
$257
$824
3
8
Temporary Drainage Structuret
0.7
3.0
3.0
3.0
$276 1
$8B6
9
Details - Inlets, Manholes, Emb
0.1
1.2
1.8
3.0
$159
$509
c
10
Specs
M
11
Bridge Scour
v
SUBTOTALS
4.6
32,3
64.4
59.8
$4,294
$13,763
GRAND TOTALS
26.2
160.4
342.9
249.2
$21,067
$67,519
11/12I2009, 1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV
Bridges
on laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-091Exhibit B-4 fee summary and
breakdown-10-30-09, DsrA
Input sheet titles, numbers, and hours to draft:
Total
Sheet Title
Sheet No.
CAD Drafting Hours by Phase
1A: Prelim oval
1B: 30% Hand
2: 100% Hend
3: 100% NM
4: 30% INS
1
Drainage areas
2
Inlet
& ROW Capacity
Calcs
3
Inlet
and
SD Demo
4
Inlet
and SD Demo
5
P&P Sheets
- Inlet
Leads
(4 locations)
6
P&P Sheets -
Inlet
Leads
(4 locations)
7
Storm Drain Extension on
Henderson
8
Flumes
Adjacent
to Walls
9
Temporary Drainage
Structures
(Prior to Channel Construction
10
Details
•
Inlets,
Manholes,
Embedment
11
Details
-
Inlets,
Manholes,
Embedment
Drafting Hours:
11/1212009, 1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc. C:\Documents and Seltings\jfd\Desktop\TRV
Bridges on IaptoplFee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-09\Exhibit B-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30.09, DsrA
Irrigation
By: TWZ
Chk'd:
$36r000
10 sheets
--
Hours
CAD Hours
Cost
SenlarDesigner
DesignerN
with
Raw
Multiplier
Robert].IGnkel VV
SwttThomasVa
F
Task
Phase
No.
Task Description
$53,40
$42.85
$30,35
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
a
SUBTOTALS
1
Drafting by sheet, Input below
0
M
SUBTOTALS
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
72.0
$2,185
$73004
2
Design
2.0
34.2
$1,571
$5,035
ca
o C
3
QC
8.0
8.0
$770
$23468
r Z
4
Specs
16.0
1
$686
$2,197
{.j
5
Cost estimate coord
8.0
$343
$1,099
6
Meetings
16.0
$686
$2,197
SUBTOTALS
10.0
82.2
72.0
$60240
$20,000
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
47.0
$1,426
$4,572
0
2
Design
2.0
20.8
$996
$3,192
3
QC
8.0
4.0
$599
$11918
4
Specs
14.0
$600
$1,923
M
5
Cost estimate coord
8.0
$343
$12099
6
Meetings
16.0
$686
$2,197
SUBTOTALS
10.0
70.8
47.0
$4,992
$160000
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
C
M
v
SUSTOTALSi
GRAND TOTALS
20.0
152.9
119.0
$11,233
$36,000
Input sheet titles, numbers, and hours to draft:
CAD Drafting Hours by Phase
SheetTitJe
Sheet No.
1A: Prelim eval
16: 30%Hand
2: 100%Hand
3: 100%NM
4: 30%INS
1
Legend
6.0
2.0
2
Irrigation plan
8.0
6.0
3
Irrigation plan
8.0
6.0
4
Irrigation plan
8.0
6.0
5
Irrigation plan
8.0
6.0
6
Irrigation plan
8.0
6.0
7
Irrigation plan
8.0
6.0
8
Irrigation plan
6.0
3.0
9
Irrigation plan
6.0
3.0
10
Details
6.0
3.0
Total Drafting Hours:
TL.0 4790
11/12I2009, 1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc. C:1Documents and Seltings\jfd\Desktop\TRV
Bridges
on laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-09\Exhibit 6-4 fee summary and
breakdown-10-30-09, Dsc5
Landscape Arch
By: DT
Chk'd:
$2091673
22 sheets
Phase
Task
No.
Task Descd don
Hours
CAD Hours
Coat
Landscape Archlled V
ArchBeclund /ntem I
larMedural Intern I
Raw
wNh
MUIUPllar
Dwight E. Taylor
ICJ
-�Ir_�I
Sorge Mabmillan
7
Catherine Amelia
$37,96
$24.31
$21.61
mn/a
1A
Drafting by sheet, input below
$76
$243
Internal project kick-off mtg
2.0
a
Obtain/review project
data
12.0
12.0
$715
$2,291
b
Develop Hardscape Linkages
69.6
$2,641
$83466
d
a
P
SUBTOTALS
83.6
12.0
f.1,432
$110000
c
18
Drafting by sheet, input below
Henderson
i
a
30%
Hardscape/Plant'g
Drwgs
33.3
66.6
$2,704
$80667
e
b
30% Cost
Estimate
6.7
6.7
$397
$1,272
M
c
30% Team
Mtgs/Coord
33.3
6.7
$1,408
$4,514
d
30% Review
Mtgs City/Others
10.0
$379
$18216
tri
a
Team/Art
Mtgs/Coord*
10.0
$379
$1,216
SUBTOTALS
93.3
79.9
$50208
$160885
2
Drafting by sheet, input below
30% Hardscape/Plant'g Dnvgs
33.3
16.0
$1,610
$58161
30% Cost Estimate
6.7
6.7
$397
$1,272
30% Team Mtgs/Coord
33.3
6.7
$1,408
$4,514
30% Review Mtgs City/Others
10.0
$379
$1,216
Team/Art
Mtgs/Coord'
10.0
$379
$1,216
60% Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs
60% Cost Opinion
66.6
13.3
16.0
16.0
10.0
$3,264
$722
$103460
$2,313
60%Team/Art
Mtgs/Coord'
50.0
5.0
$2,005
$6,425
60% Review
Mtgs
City/Others
10.0
$379
$1,216
90% Hardscape/Plant'g Drwgs
% Cost Opinion
66.6
13.3
16.0
16.0
10.0
$30264
$722
$10,460
$2,313
90% Team/Art Mtgs/Coord'
50.0
3.3
$1,969
$61310
0
0
90% Review Mtgs City/Others
10.0
$379
$10216
95% Hardscape/Planrg Orwgs
95% Hardscape/Planrg Specs
50.0
16.7
8.0
8.0
3.3
$2,264
$704
$79256
$2,257
N
95% Cost Opinion
10.0
10.0
$595
$1,908
95%Team/Art
Mtgs/Coord'
33.3
3.3
$1,336
$4,283
95% Review
Mtgs
City/Others
10.0
$379
$1,216
100%
Hardscape/Planrg
Drwg
50.0
8.0
8.0
$2,264
$7,256
100%
Hardscape/Planfg
Spec!
16.7
3.3
$704
$2,257
100%
Cost Opinion
10.0
5.0
$487
$11562
100%
Team/Art
Mtgs/Coord'
33.3
$1,264
$4,053
100%
Review Mtgs
City/Oche
10.0
$379
$1,216
SUBTOTALS
612.9
48.0
130.6
27,256
$87,356
3
a
Drafting by sheet, input below
60%Hardscape/Plant'gDrwgs
72.4
8.0
8.0
$3,116
$9,985
b
60% Cost Opinion
14.5
10.9
$784
$28514
c
d
60% Team/Arl Mtgs/Coord'
60% Review Mtgs City/Others
54.3
10.9
5.4
$2,178
$412
$6,982
$1,321
e
90%
Hardscape/Planrg
Drwgs
72A
8.0
8.0
$3,115
$9,985
f
90%
Cost
Opinion
14.5
10.9
$784
$2,614
Z
g
h
90% Team/Art Mtgs/Coord'
90% Review Mtgs City/Others
54.3
10.9
3.6
$29139
$412
$6,856
$1,321
o
i
95% Hardscape/Plant'g
Drwgs
54.3
8.0
8.0
$2,428
$7,783
95%
Hardscape/Plant'g
Specs
18.1
3.6
$765
$2,453
k
95% Cost
Opinion
10.9
10.9
$647
$21073
M
1
95% Team/Art
Mtgs/Coord'
36.2
3.6
$10452
$4,654
m
95% Review Mtgs City/Others
10.9
$412
$11321
n
100%
Hardscape/Planrg
Drwg
54.3
8.0
8.0
$2,428
$7,783
0
100%
Hardscape/Planrg
Spea
18.1
3.6
$765
$2,453
p
q
r
100% Cost Opinion
100%Team/Art Mtgs/Coord'
100% Review Mtgs City/Others
SUBTOTALS
10.9
36.2
10.9
224A
16.0
5A
32.3
$530
$1,374
$412
WJ56.0
$1,697
$43404
$1,321
$77,419
4
Drafting by sheet, input below
White Settlement
a
30% Hardscape/Planl'g
Drwgs
54.2
8.0
$2,230
$70146
b
30% Cost Estimate
8.0
8.0
$477
$1,527
M
c
d
30%Team Mtgs/Coord
30% Review Mtgs City/Others
40.0
12.0
8.0
$1,691
$456
$5,421
$1,460
e
Team/Art Mtgs/Coord'
12.0
$456
$1,460
SUBTOTALSI
114.2
24.0 1
5,308.4 1
171013.3 11
GRAND TOTALS
1128.4
64.0
278.9 1
$65,421
$209,673
11/12l2009, 1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV
Bridges
on laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-091Exhibit 6-4 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09, Dsc6
Construct Services
By: DPS/CAJ
ChWd:
$211380
No sheets
Phase
Task
No.
Task Descr! tlon
Hours
CAD Hours
cost
Enpineerl
David P. Schroed
$27,46
Evine"V
Christopher A. Jo
$41,99
Docunent Control
specialist
Debby Ann Gree
$25,42
T
��
Raw
With
Multiplier
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Internal project kick-off mtg
2.0
$55
$176
3
Obtainireview project data
2.0
$55
$176
4
4
Project kickoff mtg w/ City
2.0
$55
$176
5
Cost estimates
60.0
$1,648
$59281
Q
SUBTOTALS
66.0
$1,812
$50809
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
o 'c
2
Cost estimates
24.0
$659
$20112
M C
d
m Z
SUBTOTALS
24.0
$659
$Z112
1
Drafting
by sheet, input belowAW
$672
$2,153
2
Constructabllity review
16.0
oa
o c
3
Final
cost estimate
40.0
$16098
$3,520
r• w
i
.
N
SUBTOTALS
40.0
16.0
$18770]$22o
1
Drafting b sheet, input below
2
2
Constructability
review
16.0
$6723
Final
cost estimate
40.0
$1,098SUBTOTALS
40.0
16.0
51,770
y
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Cost estimates
24.0
$659
$2,112
0
CO)
C'
SUBTOTALS
24.0
659
2,112
GRAND TOTALS
194.0
32.0
$6,671
$21,380
11/12/2009, 1:55 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc. C:1Documents and Settingsljfd\Desktop\TRV Bridges on
IaptoplFee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-091F�chibit B-0 fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09, Dsc7
Johns Sons Reproduction Costs = TRV Central City Bridges
Phase
Deliverable
Unit Cost
Cost per Set
Unit
Subtotal
Number
of Sets
Total Cost
Prelimimary Eval
11x17 existing plans and exhibits
Black
and white
$
0.12
100
$
12.00
Color
$
0.65
50
$
32.50
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
47.88
15
$ 718.20
Informal review mtgs
11x17 presentation
Color
$
0.65
25
$
16.25
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
19.63
10
$ 196.30
Laminated 36"x48" boards
$
125.00
0
$
1
$
CAC meeting
11x17 presentation
Color
$
0.65
25
$
16.25
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
19.63
Laminated 36"x48" boards
$
125.00
4
$
500.00
Public meetings 11x17 report
Color
$
0.65
0
$
Laminated cover
$
11.00
0
$
Binding
$
3.38
0
$
11x17 presentation
Color
$
0.65
25
$
16.25
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
19.63
Laminated 36"x48" boards
$
125.00
5
$
625.00
Public notice postcards
$
0.09
100000
$
910.00
Miscellaneous
11x17 engineering plans
Black
and white
$
0.12
100
$
12.00
Color
$
0.65
20
$
13.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
28.38
Subtotal:
196.30
500.00
196.30
625.00
30% Henderson 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 150 $ 18.00
Binding $ 3.38 1 $ 3.38
$ 21.38 27 $ 577.26
Johns Sons Reproduction Costs = TRV Central City Bridges
Phase
Deliverable
Unit
Cost
Cost per Set
Unit Subtotal
Number
of Sets
60% Henderson
11x17 engineering
plans
Black
and white
$
0,12
250
$
30,00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
33,38
15
$
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0,12
500
$
60.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3,38
$
63,38
15
$
90% Henderson
11x17 engineering
plans
Black
and white
$
0,12
330
$
39.60
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3,38
$
42,98
15
$
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0,12
1000
$
120,00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3,38
$
123,38
15
$
95% Henderson
11x17 engineering
plans
Black
and white
$
0,12
340
$
40,80
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3,38
$
44.18
17
$
11x17 mylar set
Mylar
$
1,50
250
$
375,00
$
375,00
1
$
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0,12
1000
$
120,00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3,38
$
123,38
17
$
100% Henderson
11x17 engineering
plans
Black
and white
$
0.12
350
$
42,00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3,38
$
45,38
20
$
11x17 mylar set
Mylar
$
1.50
350
$
525,00
$
525,00
1
$
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0,12
1000
$
120,00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3,38
$
123,38
20
$
Miscellaneous
$
Public notice postcards
$
0,09
10,000
$
910,00
1
$
30% Main 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12
Binding $ 3.38
60% Main 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12
Binding $ 3.38
200
$
24.00
$
30,76
200
$
24,00
1
$
3,38
Total Cost
500.70
950.70 I
644.70 I
1,850.70 �
751.06 �
375.00 I
2,D97.46
907.60 I
525.00 I
2,467.60
19.48
Subtotal j 12,000.
15 $
461.40
Johns Sons Reproduction Costs = TRV Central City Bridges
Cost per Set
Number
Phase
Deliverable
Unit
Cost
Unit
Subtotal
of Sets
Total Cost
$
27.38
15
$
410.70
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0.12
500
$
60.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
63.38
15
$
950.70
90% Main
11x17 engineering plans
Black
and white
$
0.12
250
$
30.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
33.38
15
$
500.70
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0.12
1000
$
120.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
123.38
15
$
1,850.70
95% Main
11x17 engineering plans
Black
and white
$
0.12
250
$
30.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
33.38
15
$
500.70
11x17 mylar set
Mylar
$
1.50
250
.$
375.00
$
375.00
0
$
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0.12
1000
$
120.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
123.38
15
$
11850,70
100% Main
11x17 engineering plans
Black
and white
$
0.12
250
$
30.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
33.38
16
$
534.08
11x17 mylar set
Mylar
$
1.50
1
$
1.50
$
1.50
1
$
1.50
Spec book
Black
and white
$
0.12
1000
$
120.00
Binding
$
3.38
1
$
3.38
$
123.38
16
$
1,974.08
Miscellaneous
$
54.74
Public notice postcards
$
0.09
10,000
$
910.00
1
$
910.00
Subtotal 3 10,000
30% WS 11x17 engineering plans
Black and white $ 0.12 300 $ 36.00
Binding $ 3.38 2 $ 6.76
$ 42.76 23 $ 1/000400
GRAND TOTAL $ 269009.36
Exhibit "B-5" -Construction Phase cask and Hour Breakdown
Client: City of Fort Worth
Project: TRV Bridges - Construction
City Project No.: 00144
FNI Project Manager. JFD
Pro'ect Phase
Discipline
ph 5: CA Henderson
TOTAL FEE
Percent
of Total
Project Mgmt
$15,732
$15,732
14.9%
Transportation/Inf
$17,a54
$17,454
1s.s%
Structural
$50,311
$50,311
47.8
Storm Water/Utilities
$2,357
$2,357
2.2%
Irrigation
$950
$950
0.9%
Landscape Arch
53,367
$3,367
3.2%
No Group Selected
Subconsultants
$13,650
$13,650
13.0
Fir enses
$1,429
$1,429
1.4%
TOTALS
$105,250
$105,250
1b0.0
C:\Documents
and Settingsljfd\Desktop\TRV
Bridges on laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-09\F�chibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09,
S�rm�y
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
11l1212009,
2:00 PM
C
kN
W
La
3
N
U
3
m
Q:
9
c
J
C
2
Q
D
`m
3
O
U
3
C
J
C
Z
Oil
3
N
U
3
m
K
J
d
2
Q
3 �
3 H
au
r
n�
fR
ffl
�
C
0
3
a
o
to
N
�
N
N
u)
�
U
q
C
Vi
�
a
J
7
V
N
u)
2
s
s
m
m
m
>>
o
o
cD
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
m
o
0
0
in
ononoo�nNoo
0
on000
o
ui
ui
oo
vi
ui
r
o
ui
ui
ui
o
v
co
66
o
U`
fA
V
N
O
fA
EA
N
N
fA
EA
r
N
fA
fA
fA
69
b4
m
V
°E
C
E
Z
io
N
O
cpf0cd°zvc
oaia0)
(n
Q
W
O
O
O
N
Of
<
N
u
O
c�
O
v
L—
a�c��o
omU�co
MgNOnm
01
O<N
d)
V'4�0�
W
NNN
Z<N
sjsoo 6uIjuud
s;soo paudap iasp
9aandwoo
ndL
Sr
'm
0
N
N
N
qd
q;F
pLd
J
�
O
o
0
0
N
O
O
O
qf
3
L6
qe
C
Q
3
y
O
(J
3
m
C
5
3
H
°D
3
z
3
VVi
D
3
J
3
O
3
K
00
NIx
N
N
Y
O
a
U)
69
Q
U �
3
o
0
0
a d
W
x
G
3�
y
F�0
I
u
e
N
N
tz
d
7
C
j
O
L
cn
0
A
N
001
Y
N
C
C
m
O
0
(0O
w
r
y
o
m
R
e
>v
in
U
4
m
2
Q
c0i
U
<NMCh
V)n
c000<
Project Mgmt $15,732
By: JFD 40 sheets
Chk'd:
Hours CAD Hours Cost
Cadd Application
Group Manager Engineer It Analyst W%th
I.r c4
I
�
lohn F. Dewar
®
I
�ex Ivan GamJa
L.®
I I
I Word Praessor ®
I
��
I David J. Thomps ®
I Ra W
I Multinlfer
I
Phase
----
No.
Task Description
-_
$66.81
$32.50
$20.00
$36.94
1
Drafting
by sheet, input below
2
Advertise
3
Assemble bid pkg
4
Pre -bid meeting
�
5
Addenda -one
8.0
8.0
$795
$2,939
6
Bid opening
a
7
Award
�
8
Pre -con mtg
=
9
RFIs - 23 iota)
12.0
16.0
$1,323
$4,891
10
Submittals
12.0
$802
$2,963
V
11
4 site visits or meetin s
20.0
$1,336
$4,939
12
Punchlist
a
13
Record dwgs
14
Attend 5 TRVA meetings
SUBTOTALS
52.0
24.0
$4,257
$15,732
/(#
Advertise
######
Assemble bid pkg
�
Pre -bid meeting
tt##tt#t#
Addenda
#NJl###
Bid opening
#ittiN##
Award
/�
Pre -con mtg
#kti###It
RFis
######
Submittals
tl##Ht{#
Site visitsJmtgs
#######
Punchlist
ihhhitFfk
Record dwgs
�
Attend 5 TRVA meetigns
SUBTOTALS
SUBTOTALS
—._ ___
GRAND TOTALS
52.0
24.0
$4,257
$15,732
C:\Documents
and SeltingsljfdlDesktoplTRV
Bridges on
laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-09\6chibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown - 10-30-09, Dsc1
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
11/12I2009, 2:00 PM
Transportation/lnf
By: MAM
Chk'd:
$17,454
No sheets
.-.. _„-� _-._.
.
.., _
�
_v � �.�.
,
��---
0
• � -
-------'
0
• - ....
-------
-------
-------
••
0'
- � .. .. - �
-------
0
....
-------
-------
-------
--
'
--
---
-------
C:\Documents and
Settings\jfd\Desktop\TRV
Bridges
on laptop\Fee
proposal\Proposal
1030-091F�hibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09, Dsc2
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
11112/2009, 2:00 PM
Structural
By: VBK
Chkd:
$501311
No sheets
Phase
Task
No.
Task Dosc7f Uon
Hours
CAD Hours
cost
ErgWWV
En~
En*WW
EnghexN
Todv*imIV
Raw
wHh
Nuniplt"
1 Kau
$41.09
xyun t nom
$28.73
antm>o wu
$55.07
aad ea®eywa
$51,18
LIIaA Wnivaft
$33.61
1
Drafflng by sheet. Input below
2
Respond to 10 RFIs
10.0
20.0
$986
$3,642
3
Bridge shop drawings review
160.0
160.0
16.0
$122068
S44,605
L4t,1
4
2 site visits
8.0
8.0
$559
$29064
N
5
Pre -bid and pre-crostruc5on meeting
6
Retard drawings for retaining walls
ad
x
7
Retard drawings for Henderson Bridge
SUBTOTALS
176.0
te8.0
16.0
$130612
$50,311
#tgpl#q
Respond to 10 RFis
1tit1
Bridge shop drawings review
##hV N
8 field visits and final punch list
8fl3kJ1k!
Pre -bid and pre-mnstruc6on mee8ng
#t1#7tip!
Record drawings for retaining walls
#$#tig8
Remrd drawings for Henderson Bridge
SUBTOTALS
GRAND TOTALS 1
178.0
188.0
16.0
$13,612
$50,311
11l12Y2009, 2:00 PM
Freese and Nichols, Inc. C:lDocumen[s and 8et8ngs1jfdlDesktoplTRV Bddges on
IaptoplFea
proposaMraposal
10-30-091Fxhibit B-5 CA fee summary and
breakdoxn-10-30-09, Dse3
Storm Water/Utilities
By: SKH
Chk'd: KDD
$2,357
No sheets
Phase
Task
No.
Task Description
Hour*
CAD Hours
cost
EngineerV
Engineerl9
Engine"
Technicianll
Raw
With
Multiplier
Kelly Diane Dilla
$48.32
ScoK gnwlving
$31,39
Tustin T. Oswald
$27,15
Bryan Kefth ae1'ki
521.69
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
v
2
RFIs
- 1
4.0
4.0
$319
$1,178
U �
3
Site
visits
y -°'a
4
Submittals
4.0
4.0
$319
$1,178
CL
x
SUBTOTALS
8.0
8.0
$638
$Z357
RFIs
lf#
Site visits
SUBTOTALS
SUBTOTALS
GRAND TOTALS
8.0
8.0
$638
$2,357
11l1?J2009, 2:00 PM
Freese and Nichols, I��Documenls and Settings\jfd\DeskioplTRV
Bridges on lap[oplFee
proposal\Proposal
10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09, Dsc4
Irrigation
By: STV
ChWd:
$950
No sheets
Phase
Task
No.
- Task Description
Hours
CAD Hours
cost
SenlorDeslgner
Dedgnerg
I
Raw
with
Multiplier
Robert IIGnkel qw
SmttThomasVa
�
�
$53,40
$42,85
$30,35
p
1
Drafting by sheet, input below
2
Site visits
• a
3
Meetings
C
d
4
RFIs -1
6.0
$257
$950
Z
SUBTOTALS
6.0
$257
$950
tF
Site visits
f�tk
Meetings
#
RFIs
SUBTOTALS
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTALS
6.0
$257
$950
11/1212009, 2:D0 PM
Freese and Nichols, I�\Documents and SettingsljfdlDesktop\TRV Bridges on laptop\Fee proposal\Proposal 10-30-09\Exhibit B-5 CA fee summary and breakdown-10-30-09, DscS
Landscape Arch
By: DT
Chk'd:
$313 (3
22 sheets
Phase
Task
No.
Task Descrf don
Hours
CAD Hours
Cost
Lendecape Amhflect V
Arch6edural Intem I
Architectural Intern I
Raw
with
Multiplier
I DwightE.Taylor
l
LJ
lorgeMaximllfan
CatherineAmelfa
$37.96
$24m31
$21.61
a
Drafting by sheet, input below
Pre -bid Conference
b
Address Bidder RFI's/Addenda
o
c
Addenda
;?
d
Pre -Construction Conference
a
e
Review Submittals
20.0
$759
$2,806
C
a,
f
Project
Status Mlgs
T
g
Const Site Visits
U
h
Punch List/Walk Through
i
RFI-1
4.0
$152
$561
to
Z
a
SUBTOTALS
24.0
$911
$31367
Pre -bid Conference
Address Bidder RFI's/Addenda
Addenda
Pre -Construction Conference
Review Submittals
Project Status Mtgs
Const Site Visits
Punch List/Walk Through
SUBTOTALS
SUBTOTALS
GRAND TOTALS
24,0
$911
$3,367
11/12/2009, 2:00 PM
Freese and Nichols,
IDC\Documents
and Seltingslj(d\Desktop\TRV
Bridges on
laptop\Fee
proposallProposal
10-30-091Exhibil B-6 CA fee summary and breakdown - 10-30-09, Dsc6
Consulting Contract Schedule Specifications
City of Fort Worth Capital Improvement Program
Dept.: PMO Subject: Schedule Specifications
Version:l.0
Attachment D -Project Schedule
Date: June 30, 2009
This PROTECT requires a Tier 3 schedule as defined heI I2 and in the City's Schedule Guidance
Document.
D1. CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT: The CONSULTANT shall
prepare schedules for consulting services that meet the requirements described in this
specification, showing by Critical Path Method (CPM) the planned sequence and timing of
the Work associated with the Agreement. All submittals shall be submitted in PDF format,
and schedule files shall also be submitted in native file format (i.e. file formats associated
with the scheduling software). The approved scheduling software systems for creating the
schedule files are:
- Primavera (Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY)
Primavera Contractor (Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY)
Primavera SureTrak (Version 3.x or later or approved by CITY)
Microsoft Project (Version 2003/2007 or later or approved by CITY)
D2. BASELINE CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: Following notice -to -proceed, the
CONSULTANT shall develop, submit and review the draft detailed baseline consulting
services schedule with the CITY to demonstrate the CONSULTANT's understanding of the
Agreement requirements and approach for performing the work. The CONSULTANT will
prepare the final detailed baseline consulting services schedule based on CITY comments, if
any, and submit to the CITY no later than the submittal of the first project invoice.
The following guidelines shall be adhered to in preparing the baseline schedule, and as
described in further detail in the U I Y. s Schedule Guidance Document.
a. The scope shall be subdivided by work breakdown structure (WBS) representing the
tasks, subtaska, and activities associated with delivering the work.
b. The schedule shall accurately describe the major work activities, key milestones, and
dependencies/relationships as appropriate to the work.
c. The schedule should include appropriate meetings, review periods, critical decision
points, including third party utility dependencies and reviewing agencies.
D3. PROGRESS CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: The CONSULTANT shall prepare
and submit monthly to the CITY for approval the updated schedule in accordance with D1
and D2 and the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document inclusive. As the Work progresses,
the CONSULTANT shall enter into the schedule and record actual progress as described in
the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document.
The updated schedule submittal shall also include a concise schedule narrative that
highlights the following, if appropriate and applicable:
• Changes in the critical path,
• Expected schedule changes,
• Potential delays,
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS 1 OF 2
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE
• Opportunities to expedite the schedule,
• Coordination issues the CITY should be aware of or can assist with,
• Other schedule -related issues that the CONSULTANT wishes to communicate to the
CITY.
D4. PERFORMANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: If the work
accomplished falls behind that scheduled due to factors within the CONSULTANT's
control, the CONSULTANT shall take such action as necessary to improve the progress of
the Work. In addition, the CITY may require the CONSULTANT to submit a revised
schedule demonstrating the proposed plan to make up the delay in schedule progress and
to ensure completion of the Work within the allotted Agreement time.
D5. SCHEDULE TIERS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
The requirements for the schedule are determined based on the nature and needs of the
project. The schedule tier for this project is stated at the top of this document.
CONSULTANT shall submit each schedule relying on the CITY's current Schedule
Guidance Document.
D6. SCHEDULE SUBMITTAL AND PAYMENT:
As stated in III.A.(1). of the Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide the information
required by Attachment D. CONSULTANT's monthly invoices will not be accepted and
processed for payment without monthly schedule updates that are submitted in the time
and manner required by Attachment D and the CITY's current Schedule Guidance
Document.
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS 2 OF 2
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE
Trinity River Vision Central City
Final Design of the Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges
and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge
City Project No. 00144
M&C Review
Page 1 of 2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE
CODE:
12/15/2009
C
Offcial site of the City of Foit Worth, Texas
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 12/15/2009
REFERENCE NO.. C-24004 LOG NAME.
TYPE:
NON- PUBLIC
CONSENT HEARING:
Ft��riIoUll
20TRVBRIDGES
NO
SUBJECT: Authorize an Engineering Services Agreement with Freese and Nichols, Inc., in the Amount
of $3,764,201.00 as Part of the Trinity River Vision Central City Project for Evaluation and
Final Design of Bridges at North Main Street and Henderson Street and Thirty Percent
Final Design of the White Settlement Road Bridge
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an Engineering
Services Agreement in the amount of $3,764,201.00 as part of the Trinity River Vision Central City
Project for evaluation and final design of bridges at North Main Street and Henderson Street and
thirty percent final design of the White Settlement Road bridge.
DISCUSSION:
The United States Army Corps of Engineers has identified the Fort Worth Central City area as
risk" due to an aging levee system constructed in the 1950s and 1960s. In 2003, the City Council
adopted the Trinity River Master Plan, which included the construction of a bypass channel as its
preferred method of urban flood control.
The 2004 and 2008 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) included $14,733,000.00 for bridge and
street improvements and related infrastructure as part of the Trinity River Vision Central City Project.
The services to be performed under this Engineering Services Agreement (Agreement) consist of
evaluating the designs prepared in the schematic phase and preparing preliminary designs and cost
estimates for bridges over the future bypass channel at North Main Street, Henderson Street and
White Settlement Road that will allow access into Central City Fort Worth. Public participation will be
vital in selecting the preliminary design of the bridges at North Main Street, Henderson Street and
White Settlement Road. Ongoing communication and outreach will be an important part of the public
participation for this project.
Once this preliminary phase of the project is complete, final design of Henderson Street and North
Main Street bridges will be completed. White Settlement Road bridge plans will only be carried to a
30 percent level at this time which define the bridge type for the Texas Department of Transportation
(TXDOT). The construction of White Settlement Road is not scheduled until 2014 so the final design
will be completed on the current program schedule in January 2013, Construction of Henderson
Street bridge is scheduled to begin in spring 2011. North Main Street construction is scheduled to
begin in winter 2013. These bridges will be constructed in partnership with TXDOT who is anticipated
to provide a significant amount of bridge funding.
The scope of this Agreement includes the evaluation of the design of the three bridges in keeping with
the current budgets for this project, presentation of the design that will be carried to final design for all
three bridges, the final bridge design for Henderson Street and North Main Street and 30 percent
design for White Settlement Road. The consultant will also provide construction administration for the
Henderson Street bridge. Freese and Nichols, Inc., has proposed to complete this phase of design for
a lump sum amount of $3,658,951.00 and the construction phase administration will be on a time and
expense basis with a not -to -exceed limit of $105,250.00. City staff considers this fee to be fair and
reasonable for the scope of services to be performed.
http://apps.cfwnet.org/council�acket/mc_review.asp?ID=11704&councildate=l2! 15/2009 12/15/2009
M&C Review
Page 2 of 2
Freese and Nichols, Inc., is in compliance with the City's M/WBE Ordinance by committing to 30
percent MWBE participation. The City's goal on this project is 30 percent which exceeds the minimum
goal of 25 percent for all Trinity River Vision Projects.
This project is located in COUNCIL DISTRICTS 2 and 9, Mapsco 62U, 62Y and 62Q and will benefit
the entire City.
FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION:
The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current capital
budgets, as appropriated, of the Street Improvements Fund and the Street Improvements 2008 Fund.
TO Fund/Account/Centers
Submitted for City Manager's Office by:
Originating Department Head:
Additional Information Contact:
ATTACHMENTS
6 Attachment E.pdf
FROM Fund/Account/Centers
C200 531200 209260014430 $2200 000.00
C204 531200 209260014430 $1 458*951000
C204 531200 209260014480 $105 250.00
Fernando Costa (6122)
William Verkest (7801)
Randle Harwood (6101)
Mark Rauscher (2446)
Patrick Buckley (2443)
http://apps.cfwnet.org/council�acicet/mc_review.asp?ID=11704&councildate= l2/15/2009 12/15/2009
4055 International Plaza, Suite 200 •Fort Worth, Texas 76109 • 817-735-7300 •fax 817-735-7491 www.freese.com
PROJECT: TRV Bridges —City Project 00144
TO: Pat Buckley, P.E.
ADDRESS: City Hall
1000 Throckmorton St.
Fort Worth, TX 76102-6311
BY: John Dewar, P.E.
CC:
PHONE NO., 817-392-2443
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
DATE: 12/15/09
ATTACHED � UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA:
F Delivery Service and Tracking No.
r Hand Delivery F Email F Other
• Signed Agreement for Engineering Services: Trinity River Vision Central City —Final Design of
Henderson Street and North Main Street Bridges and 30% Design of White Settlement Bridge —
City Project No. 00144 (5 copies)
THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR:
USE REVIEW AND COMMENT INFORMATION
APPROVAL DISTRIBUTION TO PARTIES RESPONSE
RECORDS OTHER:
REMARKS:
Pat,
These signed agreements are ready for final execution.
Thanks, .,