HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 53958-PM1CSC No. 53958-PM1
00 00 10- 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised September 2015
SECTION 00 00 10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Division 00 - General Conditions
00 11 13 Invitation to Bidders
00 21 13 Instructions to Bidders
00 41 00 Bid Form
00 42 43 Proposal Form Unit Price
00 43 13 Bid Bond
00 45 11 Bidders Prequalification’s
00 45 12 Prequalification Statement
00 45 13 Bidder Prequalification Application
00 45 26 Contractor Compliance with Workers' Compensation Law
00 45 40 Minority Business Enterprise Goal
00 52 43 Agreement
00 61 25 Certificate of Insurance
00 62 13 Performance Bond
00 62 14 Payment Bond
00 62 19 Maintenance Bond
00 72 00 General Conditions
00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions
00 73 10 Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded
Projects
Division 01 - General Requirements
01 11 00 Summary of Work
01 25 00 Substitution Procedures
01 31 19 Preconstruction Meeting
01 31 20 Project Meetings
01 32 16 Construction Progress Schedule
01 32 33 Preconstruction Video
01 33 00 Submittals
01 35 13 Special Project Procedures
01 45 23 Testing and Inspection Services
01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls
01 55 26 Street Use Permit and Modifications to Traffic Control
01 57 13 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
01 58 13 Temporary Project Signage
01 60 00 Product Requirements
01 66 00 Product Storage and Handling Requirements
01 70 00 Mobilization and Remobilization
01 71 23 Construction Staking
01 74 23 Cleaning
01 77 19 Closeout Requirements
01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data
01 78 39 Project Record Documents
00 00 10- 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised September 2015
Technical Specifications listed below are included for this Project by reference and can be
viewed/downloaded from the City’s Buzzsaw site at:
htps://projectpoint.buzzsaw.com/client/fortworthgov/Resources/02%20-
%20Construction%20Documents/Specifications
Division 02 - Existing Conditions
02 41 13 Selective Site Demolition
02 41 14 Utility Removal/Abandonment
02 41 15 Paving Removal
Division 03 - Concrete
03 30 00 Cast-In-Place Concrete
03 34 13 Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM)
03 34 16 Concrete Base Material for Trench Repair
03 80 00 Modifications to Existing Concrete Structures
Division 26 - Electrical
26 05 00 Common Work Results for Electrical
26 05 10 Demolition for Electrical Systems
26 05 33 Raceway and Boxes for Electrical Systems
26 05 43 Underground Ducts and Raceways for Electrical Systems
Division 31 - Earthwork
31 10 00 Site Clearing
31 23 16 Unclassified Excavation
31 23 23 Borrow
31 24 00 Embankments
31 25 00 Erosion and Sediment Control
31 36 00 Gabions
31 37 00 Riprap
Division 32 - Exterior Improvements
32 01 17 Permanent Asphalt Paving Repair
32 01 18 Temporary Asphalt Paving Repair
32 01 29 Concrete Paving Repair
32 11 23 Flexible Base Courses
32 11 29 Lime Treated Base Courses
32 11 33 Cement Treated Base Courses
32 12 16 Asphalt Paving
32 12 73 Asphalt Paving Crack Sealants
32 13 13 Concrete Paving
32 13 20 Concrete Sidewalks, Driveways and Barrier Free Ramps
32 13 73 Concrete Paving Joint Sealants
32 14 16 Brick Unit Paving
32 16 13 Concrete Curb and Gutters and Valley Gutters
00 00 10- 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised September 2015
32 17 23 Pavement Markings
32 31 13 Chain Link Fences and Gates
32 31 26 Wire Fences and Gates
32 31 29 Wood Fences and Gates
32 32 13 Cast-in-Place Concrete Retaining Walls
32 91 19 Topsoil Placement and Finishing of Parkways
32 92 13 Hydro-Mulching, Seeding and Sodding
32 93 43 Trees and Shrubs
Division 33 - Utilities
33 01 30 Sewer and Manhole Testing
33 01 31 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection
33 03 10 Bypass Pumping of Existing Sewer Systems
33 04 10 Joint Bonding and Electrical Isolation
33 04 11 Corrosion Control Test Stations
33 04 12 Magnesium Anode Cathodic Protection System
33 04 30 Temporary Water Services
33 04 40 Cleaning and Acceptance Testing of Water Mains
33 05 10 Utility Trench Excavation, Embedment, and Backfill
33 05 12 Water Line Lowering
33 05 13 Frame, Cover and Grade Rings
33 05 14 Adjusting Manholes, Inlets, Valve Boxes, and Other Structures to Grade
33 05 16 Concrete Water Vaults
33 05 17 Concrete Collars
33 05 20 Auger Boring
33 05 21 Tunnel Liner Plate
33 05 22 Steel Casing Pipe
33 05 23 Hand Tunneling
33 05 24 Installation of Carrier Pipe in Casing or Tunnel Liner Plate
33 05 26 Utility Markers/Locators
33 05 30 Exploratory Excavation for Existing Utilities
33 11 10 Ductile Iron Pipe
33 11 11 Ductile Iron Fittings
33 11 12 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe
33 11 13 Concrete Pressure Pipe, Bar-Wrapped, Steel Cylinder Type
33 11 14 Buried Steel Pipe and Fittings
33 11 15 Pre-stressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe
33 12 10 Water Services 1-inch to 2-inch
33 12 11 Large Water Meters
33 12 20 Resilient Seated Gate Valve
33 12 21 AWWA Rubber-Seated Butterfly Valves
33 12 25 Connection to Existing Water Mains
33 12 30 Combination Air Valve Assemblies for Potable Water Systems
33 12 40 Dry-Barrel Fire Hydrants
33 12 50 Water Sample Stations
33 12 60 Blow-off Valves
33 31 12 Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP)
33 31 13 Fiberglass Reinforced Pipe for Gravity Sanitary Sewers
33 31 15 HDPE Pipe For Sanitary Sewers (Gravity and Force Mains)
33 31 20 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe
00 00 10- 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised September 2015
33 31 21 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Closed Profile Gravity Sanitary Sewer Pipe
33 31 22 Sanitary Sewer Slip Lining
33 31 23 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Enlargement
33 31 50 Sanitary Sewer Service Connections and Service Line
33 31 70 Combination Air Valve for Sanitary Sewer Force Mains
33 39 10 Cast-in-Place Concrete Manholes
33 39 20 Precast Concrete Manholes
33 39 30 Fiberglass Manholes
33 39 40 Wastewater Access Chamber (WAC)
33 39 60 Epoxy Liners for Sanitary Sewer Structures
33 41 10 Reinforced Concrete Storm Sewer Pipe/Culverts
33 41 11 HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe
33 46 00 Sub drainage
33 46 01 Slotted Storm Drains
33 46 02 Trench Drains
33 49 10 Cast-in-Place Manholes and Junction Boxes
33 49 20 Curb and Drop Inlets
33 49 40 Storm Drainage Headwalls and Wingwalls
Division 34 - Transportation
34 41 10 Traffic Signals
34 41 13 Removing Traffic Signals
34 41 20 Roadway Illumination Assemblies
34 41 30 Aluminum Signs
34 71 13 Traffic Control
Appendix
GC-4.01 Availability of Lands
GC-4.02 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
GC-4.04 Underground Facilities
GC-4.06 Hazardous Environmental Condition at Site
GC-6.06.D Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance
GC-6.07 Wage Rates
GC-6.09 Permits and Utilities
GC-6.24 Nondiscrimination
GR-01 60 00 Product Requirements
GeoTech Report
END OF SECTION
DIVISION 00
GENERAL CONDITIONS
00 11 13 - 1
INVITATION TO BIDDERS
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phases 1A, 1B & 1C
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised December 23, 2015
SECTION 00 11 13
INVITATION TO BIDDERS
DEVELOPER AWARDED CONTRACTS
FOR PUBLICLY BID PROJECTS ONLY
RECEIPT OF BIDS
Sealed Bids addressed to Tradition MUD No. 2B of Denton County, Board of Directors, will be
received at Peloton Land Solutions, Inc. (“Peloton”), 9800 Hillwood Parkway, Suite 250, Fort
Worth, Texas 76177, until 1:30 p.m. Local Time, Thursday March 12, 2020, and then publicly
opened and read for “Tradition MUD No. 2B of Denton County, Water Distribution, Sanitary
Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Paving to serve Tradition Phase 1a, Denton County, Texas”, “Tradition
MUD No. 2B of Denton County, Water Distribution, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Paving to
serve Tradition Phase 1b, Denton County, Texas”, and “Tradition MUD No. 2B of Denton
County, Water Distribution, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Paving to serve Tradition Phase
1c, Denton County, Texas”.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The major work will consist of the (approximate) following: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Paving,
Street Lights and Drainage Improvements for a Single Family Housing Development. Tradition,
Central Phases 1A (CPN 102508), 1B (CPN 102509) & 1C (CPN 102510).
PREQUALIFICATION
The improvements included in this project must be performed by a contractor who is pre-
qualified by the City at the time of bid opening. The procedures for qualification and pre-
qualification are outlined in the Section 00 21 13 – INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS.
DOCUMENT EXAMINATION AND PROCUREMENTS
The Bidding and Contract Documents may be examined or obtained via drop box
Copies of the Bidding and Contract Documents may be purchased from Goodwin & Marshall,
Inc. 817-329-4373 which is located at 2405 Mustang Drive, Grapevine, TX 76051:
The cost of Bidding and Contract Documents is:
Set of Bidding and Contract Documents with full size drawings: $300/each (electronic copies
provided for no charge)
Set of Bidding and Contract Documents with half size (if available) drawings: $200/each
PREBID CONFERENCE
A MANDTORY prebid conference will be held as described in Section 00 21 13 -
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS at the following location, date, and time:
DATE: Thursday, March 5th, 2020
TIME: 1:30 pm
PLACE: 9800 Hillwood Parkway, Suite 250, Fort Worth, Texas 76117
LOCATION: Peloton Conference Room
00 11 13 - 2
INVITATION TO BIDDERS
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phases 1A, 1B & 1C
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised December 23, 2015
Attendance by each prospective Bidder or its representative at the pre-bid conference is
MANDATORY, and no Bid will be opened unless the Bidder or representative was present at the
pre-bid conference.
Each Bid must be accompanied by a bid bond or a certified or cashier's check, acceptable to the
Owner, in an amount not less than 5 percent of the total amount bid, as a guarantee that the
successful Bidder will enter into the Contract and execute the Bonds on the forms provided and
provide the required insurance certificates within 7 days after the date the Contractor is notified.
DEVELOPER/MUD’S RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT BIDS
The successful Bidder, if any, will be the responsible Bidder which in the Owner’s judgment will
be most advantageous to the District and result in the best and most economical completion of the
Project as per Texas Water Code 49.273. The Owner reserves the right to waive irregularities and
to accept or reject bids. The lowest qualified bidder for Ph. 1a & 1c combined will be selected as
the contractor and the lowest qualified bidder for Ph. 1b may be selected separately. The Owner
reserves the right to select the lowest qualified bidder for the combination of Ph. 1a, 1b, and 1c
altogether if their total number of working days is substantially less than that of the Ph. 1b or
combination 1a/1c low bidders. The selected contractor for the 1a/1c contracts shall be prepared
to deliver the Ph. 1a contract first in the number of working days specified for 1a without the
acceptance or completion of 1c.
INQUIRIES
All inquiries relative to this procurement should be addressed to the following:
Attn: Yogesh Patel PE, City of Fort Worth
Email: Yogesh.Patel @fortworthtexas.gov
Phone: 817-392-2457
AND/OR
Attn: Eddie Eckart or Matt Baacke at Goodwin & Marshall, Inc.
Email: eeckart@gmcivil.com or mbaacke@gmcivil.com
Phone: 817-329-4373
ADVERTISEMENT DATES
2/23/2020
3/01/2020
END OF SECTION
00 21 13 - 1
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
SECTION 00 21 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
DEVELOPER AWARDED CONTRACTS
FOR PUBLICLY BID PROJECTS ONLY
1. Defined Terms
1.1. Certain additional terms used in these INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS have the
meanings indicated below which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof.
1.1.1. Bidder: Any person, firm, partnership, company, association, or corporation acting
directly through a duly authorized representative, submitting a bid for performing
the work contemplated under the Contract Documents.
1.1.2. The successful Bidder, if any, will be the responsible Bidder which in the Owner’s
judgment will be most advantageous to the District and result in the best and most
economical completion of the Project as per Texas Water Code 49.273. The Owner
reserves the right to waive irregularities and to accept or reject bids. The lowest
qualified bidder for Ph. 1a & 1c combined will be selected as the contractor and the
lowest qualified bidder for Ph. 1b may be selected separately. The Owner reserves
the right to select the lowest qualified bidder for the combination of Ph. 1a, 1b, and
1c altogether if their total number of working days is substantially less than that of
the Ph. 1b or combination 1a/1c low bidders. The selected contractor for the 1a/1c
contracts shall be prepared to deliver the Ph. 1a contract first in the number of
working days specified for 1a without the acceptance or completion of 1c.
2. Copies of Bidding Documents
2.1. Neither Developer/City nor Engineer shall assume any responsibility for errors or
misinterpretations resulting from the Bidders use of incomplete sets of Bidding
Documents.
2.2. Developer/City and Engineer in making copies of Bidding Documents available do so
only for the purpose of obtaining Bids for the Work and do not authorize or confer a
license or grant for any other use.
3. Prequalification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors)
3.1. All Bidders and their subcontractors are required to be prequalified for the work types
requiring prequalification at the time of bidding. Bids received from contractors who are
not prequalified (even if inadvertently opened) shall not be considered. Prequalification
requirement work types and documentation are as follows:
3.1.1. Paving – Requirements document located at;
https://projectpoint.buzzsaw.com/fortworthgov/Resources/02%20-
%20Construction%20Documents/Contractor%20Prequalification/TPW%20Paving
%20Contractor%20Prequalification%20Program/PREQUALIFICATION%20REQ
UIREMENTS%20FOR%20PAVING%20CONTRACTORS.PDF?public
3.1.2. Roadway and Pedestrian Lighting – Requirements document located at;
00 21 13 - 2
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
https://projectpoint.buzzsaw.com/fortworthgov/Resources/02%20-
%20Construction%20Documents/Contractor%20Prequalification/TPW%20Paving
%20Contractor%20Prequalification%20Program/PREQUALIFICATION%20REQ
UIREMENTS%20FOR%20PAVING%20CONTRACTORS.PDF?public
3.1.3. Water and Sanitary Sewer – Requirements document located at;
https://projectpoint.buzzsaw.com/fortworthgov/Resources/02%20-
%20Construction%20Documents/Contractor%20Prequalification/Water%20and%2
0Sanitary%20Sewer%20Contractor%20Prequalification%20Program/WSS%20pre
qual%20requirements.doc?public
3.2. Each Bidder unless currently prequalified, must be prepared to submit to City within
seven (7) calendar days prior to Bid opening, the documentation identified in Section 00
45 11, BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS.
3.2.1. Submission of and/or questions related to prequalification should be addressed to
the City contact as provided in Paragraph 6.1.
3.3. The City reserves the right to require any pre-qualified contractor who is the apparent low
bidder(s) for a project to submit such additional information as the City, in its sole
discretion may require, including but not limited to manpower and equipment records,
information about key personnel to be assigned to the project, and construction schedule,
to assist the City in evaluating and assessing the ability of the apparent low bidder(s) to
deliver a quality product and successfully complete projects for the amount bid within
the stipulated time frame. Failure to submit the additional information, if requested,
may be grounds for rejecting the apparent low bidder as non-responsive.
3.4. In addition to prequalification, additional requirements for qualification may be required
within various sections of the Contract Documents.
3.5. Special qualifications required for this project include the following:
4. Examination of Bidding and Contract Documents, Other Related Data, and Site
4.1. Before submitting a Bid, each Bidder shall:
4.1.1. Examine and carefully study the Contract Documents and other related data
identified in the Bidding Documents (including "technical data" referred to in
Paragraph 4.2. below). No information given by Developer/City or any
representative of the Developer/City other than that contained in the Contract
Documents and officially promulgated addenda thereto, shall be binding upon the
Developer/City.
4.1.2. Visit the site to become familiar with and satisfy Bidder as to the general, local and
site conditions that may affect cost, progress, performance or furnishing of the
Work.
00 21 13 - 3
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
4.1.3. Consider federal, state and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost,
progress, performance or furnishing of the Work.
4.1.4. Not Applicable
4.1.5. Study all: (i) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or
contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions relating to existing
surface or subsurface structures at the Site (except Underground Facilities) that
have been identified in the Contract Documents as containing reliable "technical
data" and (ii) reports and drawings of Hazardous Environmental Conditions, if any,
at the Site that have been identified in the Contract Documents as containing
reliable "technical data."
4.1.6. Be advised that the Contract Documents on file with the City shall constitute all of
the information which the City will furnish. All additional information and data
which the City will supply after promulgation of the formal Contract Documents
shall be issued in the form of written addenda and shall become part of the Contract
Documents just as though such addenda were actually written into the original
Contract Documents. No information given by the City other than that contained in
the Contract Documents and officially promulgated addenda thereto, shall be
binding upon the City.
4.1.7. Perform independent research, investigations, tests, borings, and such other means
as may be necessary to gain a complete knowledge of the conditions which will be
encountered during the construction of the project. Bidder must fill all holes and
clean up and restore the site to its former conditions upon completion of such
explorations, investigations, tests and studies.
4.1.8. Determine the difficulties of the Work and all attending circumstances affecting the
cost of doing the Work, time required for its completion, and obtain all information
required to make a proposal. Bidders shall rely exclusively and solely upon their
own estimates, investigation, research, tests, explorations, and other data which are
necessary for full and complete information upon which the proposal is to be based.
It is understood that the submission of a proposal is prima-facie evidence that the
Bidder has made the investigation, examinations and tests herein required. Claims
for additional compensation due to variations between conditions actually
encountered in construction and as indicated in the Contract Documents will not be
allowed.
4.1.9. Promptly notify Developer of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities or discrepancies in or
between the Contract Documents and such other related documents. The Contractor
shall not take advantage of any gross error or omission in the Contract Documents,
and the Developer shall be permitted to make such corrections or interpretations as
may be deemed necessary for fulfillment of the intent of the Contract Documents.
4.2. Reference is made to Section 00 73 00 – Supplementary Conditions for identification of:
00 21 13 - 4
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
4.2.1. those reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to
the site which have been utilized by Developer in preparation of the Contract
Documents. The logs of Soil Borings, if any, on the plans are for general
information only. Neither the Developer nor the Engineer guarantee that the data
shown is representative of conditions which actually exist.
4.2.2. those drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface and
subsurface structures (except Underground Facilities) which are at or contiguous to
the site that have been utilized by Developer in preparation of the Contract
Documents.
4.2.3. copies of such reports and drawings will be made available by City to any Bidder
on request. Bidder is responsible for any interpretation or conclusion drawn from
any "technical data" or any other data, interpretations, opinions or information.
4.3. The submission of a Bid will constitute an incontrovertible representation by Bidder (i)
that Bidder has complied with every requirement of this Paragraph 4, (ii) that without
exception the Bid is premised upon performing and furnishing the Work required by the
Contract Documents and applying the specific means, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures of construction (if any) that may be shown or indicated or expressly required
by the Contract Documents, (iii) that Bidder has given Developer written notice of all
conflicts, errors, ambiguities and discrepancies in the Contract Documents and the
written resolutions thereof by Developer are acceptable to Bidder, and when said
conflicts, etc., have not been resolved through the interpretations by Developer as
described in Paragraph 6., and (iv) that the Contract Documents are generally sufficient
to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performing and
furnishing the Work.
4.4. The provisions of this Paragraph 4, inclusive, do not apply to Asbestos, Polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), Petroleum, Hazardous Waste or Radioactive Material, unless
specifically identified in the Contract Documents.
5. Availability of Lands for Work, Etc.
5.1. The lands upon which the Work is to be performed, rights-of-way and easements for
access thereto and other lands designated for use by Contractor in performing the Work
are identified in the Contract Documents. All additional lands and access thereto
required for temporary construction facilities, construction equipment or storage of
materials and equipment to be incorporated in the Work are to be obtained and paid for
by Contractor. Easements for permanent structures or permanent changes in existing
facilities are to be obtained and paid for by Developer.
6. Interpretations and Addenda
00 21 13 - 5
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
6.1. All questions about the meaning or intent of the Bidding Documents are to be directed to
Developer’s/City’s representative. Interpretations or clarifications considered necessary
by Developer in response to such questions will be issued by Addenda delivered to all
parties recorded by Developer as having received the Bidding Documents. Only
questions answered by formal written Addenda will be binding Oral and other
interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect
Address questions to:
Attn: Goodwin & Marshall, Inc., Eddie Eckart & Matt Baacke
Email: eeckart@gmcivil.com &r mbaacke@gmcivil.com
Phone: 817-329-4373
6.2. Addenda may also be issued to modify the Bidding Documents as deemed advisable by
Developer/City.
6.3. Addenda or clarifications may be posted via DropBox
6.4. A prebid conference may be held at the time and place indicated in the Advertisement or
INVITATION TO BIDDERS. Representatives of Developer will be present to discuss
the Project. Bidders are encouraged to attend and participate in the conference.
Developer’s representative will transmit to all prospective Bidders of record such
Addenda as Developer considers necessary in response to questions arising at the
conference. Oral statements may not be relied upon and will not be binding or legally
effective.
7. Bid Security
7.1. Each Bid must be accompanied by Bid Bond made payable to Developer in an amount of
five (5) percent of Bidder's maximum Bid price on form attached, issued by a surety
meeting the requirements as listed in the General Conditions.
7.2. The Bid Bond of all Bidders will be retained until the conditions of the Notice of Award
have been satisfied. If the Successful Bidder fails to execute and deliver the complete
Agreement within 10 days after the Notice of Award, Developer may consider Bidder to
be in default, rescind the Notice of Award, and the Bid Bond of that Bidder will be
forfeited. Such forfeiture shall be Developer's exclusive remedy if Bidder defaults. The
Bid Bond of all other Bidders whom Developer believes to have a reasonable chance of
receiving the award will be retained by Developer until final contract execution.
8. Contract Times
The number of days within which, or the dates by which, Milestones are to be achieved in
accordance with the General Requirements and the Work is to be completed and ready for
Final Acceptance is set forth in the Agreement or incorporated therein by reference to the
attached Bid Form.
9. Liquidated Damages
Provisions for liquidated damages are set forth in the Agreement.
00 21 13 - 6
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
10. Substitute and "Or-Equal" Items
The Contract, if awarded, will be on the basis of materials and equipment described in the
Bidding Documents without consideration of possible substitute or "or-equal" items.
Whenever it is indicated or specified in the Bidding Documents that a "substitute" or "or-
equal" item of material or equipment may be furnished or used by Contractor if acceptable to
City, application for such acceptance will not be considered by City until after the Effective
Date of the Agreement. The procedure for submission of any such application by Contractor
and consideration by City is set forth in Section 01 25 00 of the General Requirements.
Bid Form
10.1. All blanks on the Bid Form must be completed by printing in ink and the Bid Form
signed in ink. Erasures or alterations shall be initialed in ink by the person signing
the Bid Form. A Bid price shall be indicated for each Bid item, alternative, and unit
price item listed therein. In the case of optional alternatives, the words "No Bid,"
"No Change," or "Not Applicable" may be entered legibly, in ink or type, for which
the Bidder proposes to do the work contemplated or furnish materials required.
10.2. Bids by corporations shall be executed in the corporate name by the president or a
vice-president or other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to
sign. The corporate seal shall be affixed. The corporate name, address and state of
incorporation shall be shown below the signature.
10.3. Bids by partnerships shall be executed in the partnership name and signed by a
partner, whose title must appear under the signature accompanied by evidence of
authority to sign. The official name and address of the partnership shall be shown
below the signature.
10.4. Bids by limited liability companies shall be executed in the name of the firm by a
member and accompanied by evidence of authority to sign. The name and state of
formation of the firm and the official address of the firm shall be shown.
10.5. Bids by individuals shall show the Bidder's name and official address.
10.6. Bids by joint ventures shall be executed by each joint venturer in the manner
indicated on the Bid Form. The official address of the joint venture shall be shown.
10.7. All names shall be typed or printed in ink below the signature.
10.8. The Bid shall contain an acknowledgement of receipt of all Addenda, the numbers of
which shall be filled in on the Bid Form.
10.9. Postal and e-mail addresses and telephone number for communications regarding the
Bid shall be shown.
10.10. Evidence of authority to conduct business as a Nonresident Bidder in the state of
Texas shall be provided in accordance with Section 00 43 37 – Vendor Compliance
to State Law Non Resident Bidder.
00 21 13 - 7
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
11. Submission of Bids
Bids shall be submitted on the prescribed Bid Form and proposal form, provided with the
Bidding Documents, at the time and place indicated in the Advertisement or INVITATION
TO BIDDERS, addressed to Developer/City, and shall be enclosed in an opaque sealed
envelope, marked with the City Project Number, Project title, the name and address of
Bidder, and accompanied by the Bid security, if required, and other required documents.
12. Modification and Withdrawal of Bids
12.1. Bids cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for bid opening. A request for
withdrawal must be made in writing by an appropriate document duly executed in the
manner that a Bid must be executed and delivered to the place where Bids are to be
submitted at any time prior to the opening of Bids. After all Bids not requested for
withdrawal are opened and publicly read aloud, the Bids for which a withdrawal
request has been properly filed may, at the option of the Developer/City, be returned
unopened.
13.2 Bidders may modify their Bid by electronic communication at any time prior to the
time set for the closing of Bid receipt.
13. Opening of Bids
Bids will be opened and read aloud publicly at the place where Bids are to be submitted. An
abstract of the amounts of the base Bids and major alternates (if any) will be made available
to Bidders after the opening of Bids.
14. Bids to Remain Subject to Acceptance
All Bids will remain subject to acceptance for the time period specified for Notice of Award
and execution and delivery of a complete Agreement by Successful Bidder. Developer/City
may, at their sole discretion, release any Bid and nullify the Bid security, if required, prior to
that date.
15. Evaluation of Bids and Award of Contract
15.1. Developer/City reserves the right to reject any or all Bids, including without
limitation the rights to reject any or all nonconforming, nonresponsive, unbalanced or
conditional Bids and to reject the Bid of any Bidder if Developer/City believes that it
would not be in the best interest of the Project to make an award to that Bidder,
whether because the Bid is not responsive or the Bidder is unqualified or of doubtful
financial ability or fails to meet any other pertinent standard or criteria established by
City. Developer/City also reserves the right to waive informalities not involving
price, contract time or changes in the Work with the Successful Bidder.
Discrepancies between the multiplication of units of Work and unit prices will be
resolved in favor of the unit prices. Discrepancies between the indicated sum of any
column of figures and the correct sum thereof will be resolved in favor of the correct
sum.
00 21 13 - 8
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City #102509
Revised April 4, 2014
15.1.1. Any or all bids will be rejected if Developer/City has reason to believe that
collusion exists among the Bidders, Bidder is an interested party to any litigation
against Developer/City, Developer/City or Bidder may have a claim against the
other or be engaged in litigation, Bidder is in arrears on any existing contract or
has defaulted on a previous contract, Bidder has performed a prior contract in an
unsatisfactory manner, or Bidder has uncompleted work which in the judgment
of the Developer/City will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional
work if awarded.
15.2. Developer/City may consider the qualifications and experience of Subcontractors,
Suppliers, and other persons and organizations proposed for those portions of the
Work as to which the identity of Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other persons and
organizations must be submitted as provided in the Contract Documents or upon the
request of the Developer/City. Developer/City also may consider the operating costs,
maintenance requirements, performance data and guarantees of major items of
materials and equipment proposed for incorporation in the Work when such data is
required to be submitted prior to the Notice of Award.
15.3. Developer/City may conduct such investigations as Developer/City deems necessary
to assist in the evaluation of any Bid and to establish the responsibility,
qualifications, and financial ability of Bidders, proposed Subcontractors, Suppliers
and other persons and organizations to perform and furnish the Work in accordance
with the Contract Documents to Developer’s/City's satisfaction within the prescribed
time.
15.4. If the Contract is to be awarded, it will be awarded to lowest responsible and
responsive Bidder whose evaluation by Developer/City indicates that the award will
be in the best interests of the Developer/City.
15.5. Failure or refusal to comply with the requirements may result in rejection of Bid.
16. Signing of Agreement
When Developer issues a Notice of Award to the Successful Bidder, it will be accompanied
by the required number of unsigned counterparts of the Agreement. The Contractor shall sign
and deliver the required number of counterparts of the Agreement to Developer’s
representative with the required Bonds, Certificates of Insurance, and all other required
documentation.
END OF SECTION
UTILITIES
PAVING
LIGHTING
00 41 00
DAP BID FORM
Page 1 of 3
SECTION 00 4100
DAP BID FORM
HT HWY 114 Development LP
TO: 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 420OW
Dallas, TX 75201
FOR: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Paving, Street Lights and Drainage Improvements for
Tradition, Central Phase 1B
City Project 102509
No.:
Units/Sections: FID# 30114-0200431-102509-EO7685
X-26317 W-2680
1. Enter Into Agreement
The undersigned Bidder proposes
and agrees, if this Bid is accepted, to enter into an Agreement with Developer in the form included in the
Bidding Documents to perform and furnish all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents
for the Bid Price and within the Contract Time indicated in this Bid and in accordance with the other
terms and conditions of the Contract Documents.
2. BIDDER Acknowledgements and Certification
2.1. In submitting this Bid, Bidder accepts all of the terms and conditions of the INVITATION TO
BIDDERS and INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS, including without limitation those dealing
with the disposition of Bid Bond.
2.2. Bidder is aware of all costs to provide the required insurance, will do so pending contract
award, and will provide a valid insurance certificate meeting all requirements in the
construction contract.
2.3. Bidder certifies that this Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on behalf of any
undisclosed individual or entity and is not submitted in conformity with any collusive
agreement or rules of any group, association, organization, or corporation.
2.4. Bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Bidder to submit a false or
sham Bid.
2.5. Bidder has not solicited or induced any individual or entity to refrain from bidding.
2.6. Bidder has not engaged in corrupt, fraudulent, collusive, or coercive practices in competing for
the Contract. For the purposes of this Paragraph:
a. "corrupt practice" means the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of anything of value
likely to influence the action of a public official in the bidding process.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION BID FORM —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Form Revised April 2,
2014
00 41 00
DAP BID FORM
Page 2 of 3
b. "fraudulent practice" means an intentional misrepresentation of facts made (a) to
influence the bidding process to the detriment of Developer (b) to establish Bid prices at
artificial non-competitive levels, or (c) to deprive Developer of the benefits of free and
open competition.
c. "collusive practice" means a scheme or arrangement between two or more Bidders, with
or without the knowledge of Developer, a purpose of which is to establish Bid prices at
artificial, non-competitive levels.
d. "coercive practice" means harming or threatening to harm, directly or indirectly, persons
or their property to influence their participation in the bidding process or affect the
execution of the Contract.
3. Prequalification
The Bidder acknowledges that the following work types must be performed only by prequalified
contractors and subcontractors:
Water and Wastewater New Development, Rehabilitation and
Redevelopment Open Cut tall sizes)
Concrete Construction/Reconstruction (unlimited)
Roadway and Pedestrian Lighting
4. Time of Completion
4.1. The Work will be complete for Final Acceptance within 220 working days after the
date when the Contract Time commences to run as provided in the General Conditions.
4.2. Bidder accepts the provisions of the Agreement to liquidated damages, if applicable, in the event
of failure to complete the Work {and/or achievement of Milestones} within the times specified
in the Agreement.
5. Attached to this Bid
The following documents are attached to and made a part of this Bid:
a. This Bid Form, Section 00 41 00
b. Bid Bond (if required), Section 00 43 13 issued by a surety meeting the
requirements of the General Conditions.
c. Proposal Form, Section 00 42 43
d. MBE Forms (if required)
e. Prequalification Statement, Section 00 45 12
f. Any additional documents that may be required by Section 12 of the Instructions
to Bidders
g. Bidder pre -qualification application (optional)
6. Total Bid Amount
6.1. Bidder will complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents for the following
bid amount. In the space provided below, please enter the total bid amount for this project. Only
this figure will be read publicly by the City at the bid opening.
6.2. It is understood and agreed by the Bidder in signing this proposal that the total bid
amount entered below is subject to verification and/or modification by multiplying the unit
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION BID FORM —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Form Revised April 2,
2014
00 41 00
DAP BID FORM
Page 3 of 3
bid prices for each pay item by the respective estimated quantities shown in this proposal and
then totaling all of the extended amounts.
6.3. Evaluation of Alternate Bid Items <use this if applicable, otherwise delete>
Total Base Bid $5,787,230.00 .
Alternate Bid
Deductive Alternate
Additive Alternate
TOTAL BID $5,787,230.00
7. Bid Submittal
This Bid is submitted on 4/2/2020 by the entity named below:
Respectfully submitted,
By.-PWX OR
(Sin re)
Receipt is acknowledged of
the following Addenda:
Initial
Printed Name: Brock Huggins
Addendum No. 1 3/10/2020
Title: President
Addendum No. 2 3/17/2020
Addendum No. 3 3/31/2020
Company:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
Addendum No. 4
Address:
5327 Wichita St.
Ft. Worth, TX 76119
State of Incorporation: TX
Email: brock@cctxlp.com
Phone: 817-534-1743
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION BID FORM —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Form Revised April 2,
2014
Tradition, Central Phase 1B
City Project #102509
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - Bid Comparison
Tradition - Central Phase 1 B - CPN: 102509
UNIT PRICE BID
Project Item Information
Conatser
Bidlist
Item
Description
Specification Section No.
Unit of
Measure
Bid Quantity
Unit Price
Bid Value
Tradition Central Phase 1B Paving Facilities
1
3213 0102 7" Conc PvmtiCollector)
32 13 13
SY
6.244
$42,50
$265 370.00
2
3211.0502 8" Lime Treatment I Collector)
3211 29
SY
6,582
$3.50
$23 03T00
3
3211.0400 Hvdrated Lime Material ai 36 LBS./SY Collector
32 11 29
TON
118
$180.00
$21 240.00
4
3213.0101 6" Cone Pvmt j Residential
32 13 13
SY
28,788
$36.50
$1 050.762.00
5
3211.0501 6" Lime Treatment Residential 1
321129
SY
30,773
$3.00
S92,319.00
6
3211.0400 Hydrated Lime Material a 30 LBS./SY Residential
32 11 29
TON
462
$180.00
$83 160.00
7
3213.0101 6" Cone Pvmt(Alley)
3213 13
SY
10,445
$37.50
$391,687.50
8
3211.0501 6" Lime Treatment(Alley)
32 11 29
SY
11.316
$3.00
$33 949.00
9
3211.0400 Hydrated Lime Material u, 30 LBS./SY [All
32 1129
TON
170
$180.00
$30,600.00
10
3213.0303 6" Cone Sidewalk
32 1320
SF
21,095
$4.50
$94.927.50
11
3213.0506 Barrier Free Ramp, Tvpe P-1
32 13 20
EA
58
$1.500.00
$87 000.00
12
3213.0501 Barrier Free Ramp, Type R-1
321320
EA
12
$1.600.00
$19200.00
13
3441.4003 FumishRnstall Alum Sign Ground Mount Citv Std.
34 41 30
EA
22
$750.00
$16 500.00
14
9999.0001 D3-1 Street Name Siww
3441 30
EA
80
$250.00
$20.000.00
15
9999.0002 RI-1 Stop Sien
344130
EA
21
$750.00
$15.750.00
16
9999.0003 24" Therm oh Stop Stripe
00 00 00
EA
4
$500.00
$2 000.00
17
9999.0004 4" Solid Double Yellow Str' a
00 00 00
LF
1.308
$2.00
$2.616.00
18
9999.0005 End of Road Barricade
00 00 00
EA
4
$750.00
$3 000.00
19
9999 0006 Cnncrete Header
00 00 00
LF
124
$20.00
$2 480.00
20
9999 0007 ('„neon[ to Ex. Ptivcmau
00 00 00
LF
95
$20.00
$1,900.00
21
9W9.0008 Remove End of Road Bameade
00 00 00
EA
3
$250.00
$750.00
Tradition Central Phase 1B Paving
Subtotal
$2,258,247,00
Tradition Central Phase 1B Water
22
3311.0261 8" PVC Water Pie
33 11 12
LF
7,942
$38.00
$301 796,00
23
3311.0461 12" PVC Water Pipe
33 11 12
LF
1,396
$62.00
$86 552.00
24
3305.0109 Trench Safety {Water
330510
LF
9338
$1.00
$9338.00
25
3305.0003 8" Waterline LoweELnS
3305 12
EA
15
$2,500.00
$37 500.00
26
3305.0005 12" Waterline Lowering
3305 12
EA
4
$3,500.00
$14 000.00
27
3311.0001 Ductile Iron Water Fittines w/ Restraint
33 11 11
TON
2.10
$5,500.00
$11 550.00
28
3312.0001 Std. Fire Hvdrant Assembly w/ 6" Gate Valve & Box
33 1240
EA
9
$4500.00
$40 500.00
29
3312.3003 8" Gate Valve
33 1220
EA
19
$1-250.001
$23,750.00
30
3312.3005 12" Gate Valve
33 1220
EA
I
$2,400.00
$2,400.00
31
3312.0117 Connection to Exist' 4"-12" Water Main
33 1225
EA
8
$1 200.00
$9.600.00
32
0241.1118 4"-12" Pressure Pluo (Water)
0241 14
EA
2
$1 000.00
$2.000.00
33
3312.2003 1" Water Service
33 1210
EA
270
$1.000.00
$27 000.00
34
9999.00091" Domestic Service
00 00 00
EA
1
$1200.00
$1200.00
34
9999.00101" Irrig ation Service
000000
EA
1
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
Tradition Central Phese 1B Water Subtotal
$811,386.00
Tradition Central Phase IB Sewer
35
3331.4115 8" Sewer Pipe
33 11 10 33 31 12 33 3l 20
LF
5,718
$52.00
$297 336.00
36
3331.4116 8" Sewer Pipe. CSS Backfill
33 11 10 33 31 12,3331 20
LF
468
$62.00
$29 016.00
37
3331.4208 12" Sewer Pipe
33 11 10 33 31 12,3331 20
LF
1320
$76.00
$100320.00
38
3331.4209 12" Sewer Pipe, CSS Backfill
33 11 10 33 31 IZ 33 3120
LF
100
$96.00
$9 600.00
39
3305.0109 Trench Safer Sewer
3305 10
LF
7,606
$2.00
$IS 212.00
40
330i OW2 Post -CCTV Inspection
33 01 31
LF
7 606
$3.50
$26 621.00
41
9990.0011 8" Sewer Pipe, Steel Casing
00 00 00
LF
20
$160.00
$3,20000
42
1339.1001 4' Manhole
33 39 10. 33 39 20
EA
34
$4,800.00
$163.200.00
43
3301.0101 Manhole Vacuum Testing
3301 30
EA
34
$150.00
$5.100.00
44
3339.I003 4' Extra D nth Manhole
33 3910 33 39 20
VF
143
$195.00
S27.885.00
45
3305 0113 Trench Water Stops
3305 15
EA
21
$250.00
$5.250.00
46
3331.3t01 4" Sewer Service
333150
EA
272
$750.00
$204.000.06
47
0141 1 118 4"42" Pressure Plum I Sewer)-0241
14
EA
3
$1,000.00
$3.000.00
48
9999.001 ] Connection to Existing 4"-12" Sewer
33 1225
EA
1
$1,500.00
$1.500.00
Tradition Central Phase 1B
Sewer Subtotal
$891,240.00
crly oe Proar woara
SrANDARO CON91RNCr10NBmPROP09N.OEVELOPEItRWARDFD PROlEC15 PB 1U2 T�tiilm-Csmnl Phx lO-CPN:1035U
P"im Reaix! IWy 1, 2011 BO W "2 <3 Bid P-1
SECTION 00 42 43
Developer Awarded Projects - PROPOSAL FORM
Tradition -Central Phase 1 B - CPN: 102509
UNIT PRICE BED
Project Item Information
Conatser
Bm
Item
Description
Specification Section No.
Unit of
Bid Quantity
Measure
Unit Price
Bid Value
Tradition Central Phase 1B Storm Drain Facilities
49
3341.0201 21" RCP, Class III
3341 10
LF
2.504
$55.00
$137 720.00
50
3341.0205 24" RCP, Class III
3341 10
LF
1,199
$60.00
$71 940.00
51
3341.0208 27" RCP Class III
3341 10
LF
960
$65,00
$62.400.00
52
3341.0302 30" RCP Class III
3341 10
LF
87
$75.00
$6.525.00
53
3341.0309 36" RCP Class IB
3341 10
LF
97
$105.00
$10.185.00
54
3341.0312 39" RCP Class III
3341 10
LF
285
$120.00
$34,200.00
55
3341.0402 42" RCP_ Class BI
3341 10
LF
168
$135.00
$22.680.00
56
3341.0409 48" RCP. Class III
1 3341 10
LF
360
$155,001
$55 800.00
57
3341.0502 54" RCP Class III
3341 10
LF
221
$195.00
$43 095.00
58
3341.1201 50 Box Culvert
3341 10
LF
372
$275.00
$102300.00
59
3341.1302 60 Box Culvert
3341 10
LF
663
$325.00
$215.475.00
60
3341.1303 6x4 Box Culvert
3341 10
LF
769
$335.00
$257 615.00
61
3305.0109 Trench Safety
3305 10
LF
7,685
$2.00
$15 370.00
62
3305.0112 Concrete Collar
3305 17
EA
12
$1 000.00
$12,000,00
63
3349.0001 4' Storm Junction Box
3349 10
EA
4
$4,500.00
$18 000.00
64
3349.0002 5' Storm Junction Box
3349 10
EA
1
$5,500.00
$5 500.00
65
9999.0013 6x4 Storm Junction Box
00 00 00
EA
1
$6,500.00
$6,500.00
66
9999.0014 6x5 Storm Junction Box
00 00 00
EA
$7 500.00
$7.500.00
67
9999.0015 7x4 Storm Junction Box
00 00 00
EA$8
000.00
$8,000.00
68
9W9.0016 8x4 Storm Junction Box
00 00 00
EA$9,000.00
$27.000.00
69
W99.0017 8x5 Storm Junction Box
00 00 00
EA$9
Ell
500,00
$9,500.00
70
9999,0018 13x5 Storm Junction Box
00 00 00
EA$17
500.00
$17,500.00
71
3349.5001 10' Curb inlet
33 49 20
EA$3.400.00
$129.200.00
72
3349.5002 15' Curb Met
33 49 20
EA$4,400.00
$8.800.00
73
9999.0019 Simle Neenah R-3210-LLM
00 00 00
EA$6
500.00
$71,500.00
74
9999.0020 Double Neenah R-3210-LLM
00 00 00
EA
8
$8.500.00
$68 000.00
75
3117 0104 Medium Stone Ri ra , dry
31 37 00
SY
332
$105.00
$34.860.00
76
3137 0101 Concrete RipRiprap
31 37 00
SY
34
$120.00
$4 080.00
77
9999 0021 4x6 Sloped Headwall
00 00 00
EA
1
$6.500.00
$6 500.00
78
9999 002_' 3x5 Double Sloped Headwall
00 00 00
EA
1
$8,500,00
$8,500.00
79
9999 00'3 S.D. 24" End & PI
00 00 00
EA
1
$850.00
$850.06
80
9999.0024 S.D. 42" End & PI
00 00 00
EA
1
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
Tradition Central Phase 1B Storm Drain Subtotal
$1,480,295.00
Tradition Central Phase 111 Lighting
81
2605.3012 2" CONDT PVC SCH 40 T
26 05 33
LF
2,922
$12.00
$35 064.00
82
3441.1408 NO 6 Insulated Elec Condr
3441 10
LF
8,766
$3.00
$26 298.00
83
3441.1637 Type 33A Arm
34 41 20
EA
32
$375.00
$12.000.00
84
3441.3201 LED Lighting Fixture f R-2
34 41 20
EA
31
$850.00
$26.350.00
85
3441.3201 LED L. •hti • Fixture R-4
34 41 20
EA
1
$950.00
$950.00
86
3441.3302 Rdwy Illum Foundation TY 3.5.6, and 8
3541 20
EA
32
$1,200.00
$38,400.00
87
3441.3342 Rd Elum TY l8 Pole
34 41 20
EA
32
3,000.00
$96,000.00
Tradition Central Phase 111 Lighting Subtotal
I
S235 062.00
Rid Cnmmn.-.•
Pavin u Facilities Subtotal
$2,258,247.00
Water Subtotal
$811 386.00
Sewer Subtotal
$891.240.00
Storm Drain Facilities Subtotal
$1,480.295.00
Li •.lrtin • Facilities Subtotal
$235,062.00
Total Bid
S.5,676.2301H1
100% Paru•ent Bond
$75000,0u
100% Performance Bond
2-; ear 100% Maintenance Bond
Lim
Grand Total
The bid is submitted by the entity listed below:
Company: Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
By: Brock Huggins
Street Address: 5327 Wichita St.
Print Name
City, State, Zip Code: Ft. Worth, TX 76119
Phone: 817-534-1743
Signatu
Title: President
Date:
Contractor agrees to complete WORK for FINAL ACCEPTANCE within 220 working days after the
END OF SECTION
CITY OFF Tw m
Sr�ARD CONSiRECl10NBRJ PRCPWAL-0EVEI.�ER AWARDEDPRCBiM Pege 2 or2 Tndili""-CCNraI Plan IB -CPN 1025"9
Fmn R"Nnd JWy 1, 2018 0002 6l_Bid P,"p"ul
0045 11- 1
BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS
Page 1 of 3
SECTION 00 4511
BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS
1. Summary. All contractors are required to be prequalified by the City prior to submitting
bids. To be eligible to bid the contractor must submit Section 00 45 12, Prequalification
Statement for the work type(s) listed with their Bid. Any contractor or subcontractor who is
not prequalified for the work type(s) listed must submit Section 00 45 13, Bidder
Prequalification Application in accordance with the requirements below.
The prequalification process will establish a bid limit based on a technical evaluation and
financial analysis of the contractor. The information must be submitted seven (7) days prior
to the date of the opening of bids. For example, a contractor wishing to submit bids on
projects to be opened on the 7th of April must file the information by the 31 st day of March
in order to bid on these projects. In order to expedite and facilitate the approval of a Bidder's
Prequalification Application, the following must accompany the submission.
a. A complete set of audited or reviewed financial statements.
(1) Classified Balance Sheet
(2) Income Statement
(3) Statement of Cash Flows
(4) Statement of Retained Earnings
(5) Notes to the Financial Statements, if any
b. A certified copy of the firm's organizational documents (Corporate Charter, Articles
of Incorporation, Articles of Organization, Certificate of Formation, LLC
Regulations, Certificate of Limited Partnership Agreement).
c. A completed Bidder Prequalification Application.
(1) The firm's Texas Taxpayer Identification Number as issued by the Texas
Comptroller of Public Accounts. To obtain a Texas Taxpayer Identification
number visit the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts online at the
following web address www.window.state.tx.us/tmp_ermit/ and fill out the
application to apply for your Texas tax ID.
(2) The firm's e-mail address and fax number.
(3) The firm's DUNS number as issued by Dun & Bradstreet. This number
is used by the City for required reporting on Federal Aid projects. The DUNS
number may be obtained at www.dnb.com.
d. Resumes reflecting the construction experience of the principles of the firm for firms
submitting their initial prequalification. These resumes should include the size and
scope of the work performed.
e. Other information as requested by the City.
2. Prequalification Requirements
a. Financial Statements. Financial statement submission must be provided in
accordance with the following:
(1) The City requires that the original Financial Statement or a certified copy
be submitted for consideration.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project #102509
Revised April 2, 2014
0045 11 - 2
BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS
Page 2 of 3
(2)
To be satisfactory, the financial statements must be audited or reviewed
by an independent, certified public accounting firm registered and in
good standing in any state. Current Texas statues also require that
accounting firms performing audits or reviews on business entities within
the State of Texas be properly licensed or registered with the Texas State
Board of Public Accountancy.
(3)
The accounting firm should state in the audit report or review whether
the contractor is an individual, corporation, or limited liability company.
(4)
Financial Statements must be presented in U.S. dollars at the current rate
of exchange of the Balance Sheet date.
(5)
The City will not recognize any certified public accountant as
independent who is not, in fact, independent.
(6)
The accountant's opinion on the financial statements of the contracting
company should state that the audit or review has been conducted in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America. This must be stated in the accounting firm's opinion.
It should: (1) express an unqualified opinion, or (2) express a qualified
opinion on the statements taken as a whole.
(7)
The City reserves the right to require a new statement at any time.
(8)
The financial statement must be prepared as of the last day of any month,
not more than one year old and must be on file with the City 16 months
thereafter, in accordance with Paragraph 1.
(9)
The City will determine a contractor's bidding capacity for the purposes
of awarding contracts. Bidding capacity is determined by multiplying the
positive net working capital (working capital = current assets — current
liabilities) by a factor of 10. Only those statements reflecting a positive
net working capital position will be considered satisfactory for
prequalification purposes.
(10)
In the case that a bidding date falls within the time anew financial
statement is being prepared, the previous statement shall be updated with
proper verification.
b. Bidder Prequalification Application. A Bidder Prequalification Application must be
submitted along with audited or reviewed financial statements by firms wishing to be
eligible to bid on all classes of construction and maintenance projects. Incomplete
Applications will be rejected.
(1)
In those schedules where there is nothing to report, the notation of
"None" or "N/A" should be inserted.
(2)
A minimum of five (5) references of related work must be provided.
(3)
Submission of an equipment schedule which indicates equipment under
the control of the Contractor and which is related to the type of work for
which the Contactor is seeking prequalification. The schedule must
include the manufacturer, model and general common description of
each piece of equipment. Abbreviations or means of describing
equipment other than provided above will not be accepted.
3. Eligibility to Bid
a. The City shall be the sole judge as to a contractor's prequalification.
b. The City may reject, suspend, or modify any prequalification for failure by the
contractor to demonstrate acceptable financial ability or performance.
c. The City will issue a letter as to the status of the prequalification approval.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project #102509
Revised April 2, 2014
004511-3
BIDDERS PREQUALIFICATIONS
Page 3 of 3
d. If a contractor has a valid prequalification letter, the contractor will be eligible to bid
the prequalified work types until the expiration date stated in the letter.
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase IB
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project #102509
Revised April 2, 2014
0045 12
DAP PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Page 1 of 1
SECTION 00 4512
DAP — PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT
Each Bidder is required to complete the information below by identifying the prequalified contractors
and/or subcontractors whom they intend to utilize for the major work type(s) listed. In the "Major Work
Type" box provide the com lete major work type and actual description asprovided by the Water
Department for water and sewer and TPW for paving_
Water and Wastewater New
Development, Rehabilitation and
Redevelopment Open Cut
(all sizes I
Concrete
Construction/Reconstruction
Roadway and Pedestrian
Contractor/Subcontractor Company Name I
Prequalifcation
Expiration Date
Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 1 7/31/2020
Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 1/3/2021
Conatser Construction TX, L.P. 1 1 /7/2022
The undersigned hereby certifies that the contractors and/or subcontractors described in the table above
are currently prequalified for the work types listed.
BIDDER:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
5327 Wichita St. BY:
Ft. Worth, TX 76119 `
(. ignature)
TITLE: Brock Huggins, President
DATE:
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 113
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PREQUALIFICATION STATEMENT— DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Form Version September 1, 2015
00 45 26 - 1
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW
Page 1 of 1
SECTION 00 45 26
CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH WORKER'S COMPENSATION LAW
Pursuant to Texas Labor Code Section 406.096(a), as amended, Contractor certifies that it
provides worker's compensation insurance coverage for all of its employees employed on City
Project No. 102509 . Contractor further certifies that, pursuant to Texas Labor Code,
Section 406.096(b), as amended, it will provide to City its subcontractor's certificates of
compliance with worker's compensation coverage.
CONTRACTOR:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P. By: Brock Huggins
Company
5327 Wichita Street Signature:
Address
Ft. Worth, TX 76119 Title: President
City/State/Zip
LINDSEY S GRIER
�PPY P�9 �G
THE STATE OF TEXAS § _a G�c Notary Public, State of Texas
�+ �Z Comm, Expires 08-06-2023
COUNTY OF TARRANT § ',°,;,���� Notary ID 13032378-2
BE t ndersi d authority, on this day personally appeared
known to me to be the person whose name is
subscribed to the fore i g ' e t cknowledged to me that he/she executed the same as
the act and deed of for the purposes and
consideration therein expre ed and in the capacity therein stated.
GI EN UN ER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this �0 1 1 day of
2020.
MW"4 &�A
Notary Public in a d for the State of Texas
END OF SECTION
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase I
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS City Project #102509
Revised April 2, 2014
00 52 43 - 1
Developer Awarded Project Agreement
Page 1 of 4
SECTION 00 52 43
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, authorized on is made by and between the
Developer, HT HWY 114 Development LP , authorized to do business in Texas and
Contractor, Conatser Construction T_X, L.P. , authorized to do business in
Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized representative.
Developer and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as
follows:
Article 1. WORK
Contractor shall complete all Work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents for the
Project identified herein.
Article 2. PROJECT
The project for which the Work under the Contract Documents may be the whole or only a part is
generally described as follows:
Water, Sanitan• Sewer, Paving, Street Lights and Drainage Improvements for
Tradition Central Phase 1B
04, Project #102509
FID #30114-0200431-102509-E07685
X-26317 W-2680
Article 3. CONTRACT TIME
3.1 Time is of the essence.
All time limits for Milestones, if any, and Final Acceptance as stated in the Contract
Documents are of the essence to this Contract.
3.2 Final Acceptance.
The Work will be complete for Final Acceptance within 220 working days after the
date when the Contract Time commences to run as provided in Paragraph 12.04 of the
Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects.
3.3 Liquidated damages
Contractor recognizes that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that Developer
will suffer financial loss if the Work is not completed within the times specified in
Paragraph 3.2 above, plus any extension thereof allowed in accordance with Article 10 of
the Standard City Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded
Projects. The Contractor also recognizes the delays, expense and difficulties involved in
proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the Developer if the Work is not
completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof , Contractor agrees
that as liquidated damages for delay (but not as a penalty), Contractor shall pay
Developer Two Hundred & Fifty Dollars $250.00 for each day that
expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.2 for Final Acceptance until the City issues
the Final Letter of Acceptance.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DAP City Project 4102509
Revised June 16, 2016
005243-2
Developer Awarded Project Agreement
Page 2 of 4
Article 4. CONTRACT PRICE
Developer agrees to pay Contractor for performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract
Documents an amount in current funds of Five Million Seven Hundred Eighty Seven
Thousand Two Hundred Thirty00 & 0011Dollars $5 787 230.00
Article 5. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
5.1 CONTENTS:
A. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between Developer and
Contractor concerning the Work consist of the following:
1. This Agreement.
2. Attachments to this Agreement:
a. Bid Form (As provided by Developer)
1) Proposal Form (DAP Version)
2) Prequalification Statement
3) State and Federal documents (project specific)
b. Insurance ACORD Form(s)
c. Payment Bond (DAP Version)
d. Performance Bond (DAP Version)
e. Maintenance Bond (DAP Version)
f. Power of Attorney for the Bonds
g. Worker's Compensation Affidavit
h. MBE and/or SBE Commitment Form (If required)
3. Standard City General Conditions of the Construction Contract for Developer
Awarded Projects.
4. Supplementary Conditions.
5. Specifications specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment
or, if not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of
Contents of the Project's Contract Documents.
6. Drawings.
7. Addenda.
8. Documentation submitted by Contractor prior to Notice of Award.
9. The following which may be delivered or issued after the Effective Date of the
Agreement and, if issued, become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents:
a. Notice to Proceed.
b. Field Orders.
c. Change Orders.
d. Letter of Final Acceptance.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 113
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DAP City Project # 102509
Revised June 16, 2016
00 52 43 - 3
Developer Awarded Project Agreement
Page 3 of 4
Article 6. INDEMNIFICATION
6.1 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own
expense, the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all
claims arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed
by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees
under this contract. This indemnification provision is specifically intended too erate
and be effective even if it is alleged or proven that all or some of the damages being
sought were caused in whole or in part, by any act omission or negligence of the city.
This indemnity provision is intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for
costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the city in defending against such claims and
causes of actions.
6.2 Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense,
the city, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage
or destruction of property of the city, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work
and services to be performed by the contractor, its officers, agents, employees,
subcontractors, licensees or invitees under this contract. This indemnification
provision is specifically intended to operate and be effective even if it is alleged or
proven that all or some of the damages being sought were caused in whole or in part
bv anN- act, omission or negligence of the city.
Article 7. MISCELLANEOUS
7.1 Terms.
Terms used in this Agreement are defined in Article 1 of the Standard City Conditions of
the Construction Contract for Developer Awarded Projects.
7.2 Assignment of Contract.
This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents may not be assigned by the
Contractor without the advanced express written consent of the Developer.
7.3 Successors and Assigns.
Developer and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal
representatives to the other party hereto, in respect to all covenants, agreements and
obligations contained in the Contract Documents.
7.4 Severability.
Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be unconstitutional, void or
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction shall be deemed stricken, and all
remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon DEVELOPER and
CONTRACTOR.
7.5 Governing Law and Venue.
This Agreement, including all of the Contract Documents is performable in the State of
Texas. Venue shall be Tarrant County, Texas, or the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 113
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS —DAP City Project # 102509
Revised June 16, 2016
see attached
Robert W. Witte
Senior Managing Director
DocuSign Envelope ID: 29E90507-AE53-4A7B-91E8-675CE9920962
4/22/2020
006925.00000 l \48l 3-0640-4998.v3
HT HWY 114 DEVELOPMENT LP
By: HT Hwy 114 Development LLC, its general partner
By: HT Hwy 114 LP, its sole member
By: Hines Hwy 114 LLC, its general partner
By: Hines Hwy 114 Associates LP, its sole member
By: Hines Investment Management Holdings Limited
Partnership, its general partner
By: HIMH GP LLC, its general partner
By: Hines Real Estate Holdings Limited
Partnership, its sole member
By: JCH Investments, Inc.,
its general partner
By: ________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Robert W. Witte
Senior Managing Director
DocuSign Envelope ID: 29E90507-AE53-4A7B-91E8-675CE9920962
Bond No. 0230485
00 62 13 - 1
PERFORMANCE BOND
Page 1 of 2
SECTION 00 62 13
PERFORMANCE BOND
THE STATE OF TEXAS
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF TARRANT
That we, Conatser Construction TX, L.P. , known as "Principal' herein and,
Berkley Insurance Company a corporate surety(sureties, if more than
one) duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or
more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, HT HWY 114 Development LP
authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal
corporation ("City"), in the penal sum of, Five Million Seven Hundred Ei;hly Seven Thousand Two
Hundred Thin►• & 00/100 Dollars $5 787 230.00 , lawful money of the United States, to be
paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made jointly
unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of
community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities Agreement, CFA
Number CFA20-0003 ;and
WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer awarded
the day of , 2020, which Contract is hereby referred to and made a part hereof
for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment labor and other accessories
defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any Change Orders, as provided for in said
Contract designated as Water, Sanitary Sewer, Paving, Street Lights and Draina::e
lfm rovements for Tradition Central Phase 1B.
NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Principal shall
faithfully perform it obligations under the Contract and shall in all respects duly and faithfully perform the
Work, including Change Orders, under the Contract, according to the plans, specifications, and contract
documents therein referred to, and as well during any period of extension of the Contract that may be
granted on the part of the Developer and/or City, then this obligation shall be and become null and void,
otherwise to remain in full force and effect.
PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in Tarrant
County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase I
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised January 31, 2012
006213-2
PERFORMANCE BOND
Page 2 of 2
This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the Texas
Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in accordance with the
provisions of said statue.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have SIGNED and SEALED this
instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the day of , 2020,
ATTEST:
(Principal) Secretary
tiss +torin�*
JWiso Surety
PRINCIPAL:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
BY:
Signature go
Brock Hu ins, President
Name and Title
Address: 5327 Wichita St.
Ft. Worth, TX 76119
SURETY:
Berkley Insurance Company
BY:,
Signature
Robbi Morales, Attorney -in -fact
Name and Title
Address: 5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75244
Telephone Number: 214/989-0000
*Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract
from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If
Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided.
The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised January 31, 2012
Tradition, Central Phase I
City Project #102509
Bond No. 0230485
SECTION 00 6214
PAYMENT BOND
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
006214-1
PAYMENTBOND
Page 1 of
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
That we, Conatser Construction TX. L.P. , known as "Principal"
herein, and Berkley Insurance Company a
corporate surety ( or sureties if more than one), duly authorized to do business in the State of
Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the
Developer, HT HWY 114 Development LP . authorized to do business in
Texas "(Developer"), and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal corporation ("City"), in the
penal sum of Five Million Seven Hundred Eighty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Thirty &
00/100 Dollars (1-s5.787.230.00) , lawful money of the United States, to be paid in Fort
Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for the payment of which sum well and truly be made jointly unto
the Developer and the City as dual obligees, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents:
WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of
community facilities in the City of Fort Worth, by and through a Community Facilities
Agreement, CFA Number CFA20-0003 ; and
WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a certain written Contract with Developer,
awarded the day of , 2020, which Contract is hereby referred to
and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials,
equipment, labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work as
provided for in said Contract and designated as Water SanitaEX Sewer Paying, Street Lights
and Drainne Improvements for Tradition Central Phase 113.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that if
Principal shall pay all monies owing to any (and all) payment bond beneficiary (as defined in
Chapter 2253 of the Texas Government Code, as amended) in the prosecution of the Work under
the Contract, then this obligation shall be and become null and void; otherwise to remain in full
force and effect.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 113
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised January 31, 2012
006214-2
PAYMENTBOND
Page 2 of 2
This bond is made and executed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 2253 of the
Texas Government Code, as amended, and all liabilities on this bond shall be determined in
accordance with the provisions of said statute.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED
this instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the day of
, 2020.
ATTEST:
(Principal) Secretary
it ss�r'
ATTEST:
(Surety) Secretary
Witn s to Surety
PRINCIPAL:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P
ft
BY:
Signature
Brack HugginsPresident
Name and Title
Address: 5327 Wichita St.
Ft. Worth TX 76119
SURETY:
Berkley Insurance Company
BY: Q� .9 k2az"/
Signature
Robbi Morales, Attorney -in -fact
Name and Title
Address: 5005 LBJ Freewav Suite 1500
Dallas TX 75244
Telephone Number: 214/989-0000
Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety, there must be on file a certified extract from the
bylaws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If Surety's physical
address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided.
The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase I
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS —DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised January 31, 2012
SECTION 00 6219
MAINTENANCE BOND
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
Bond No. 0230485
006219- 1
MAINTENANCE BOND
Page 1 of 3
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS:
That we, Conatser Construction TY, L.P. , known as "Principal' herein
and Berkley Insurance Company , a corporate surety (sureties, if more
than one) duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas, known as "Surety" herein (whether
one or more), are held and firmly bound unto the Developer, HT HWY 114 Development LP,
authorized to do business in Texas ("Developer") and the City of Fort Worth, a Texas municipal
corporation ("City"), in the sum of Five Million Seven Hundred Eiahtl Seven Thonand Two
Hundred Thirty & 00/100 Dollars l_55,787,230.00) , lawful money of the United
States, to be paid in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas, for payment of which sum well and truly
be made jointly unto the Developer and the City as dual obligees and their successors, we bind
ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally,
firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, Developer and City have entered into an Agreement for the construction of
community facilities in the City of Fort Worth by and through a Community Facilities
Agreement, CFA Number CFA20-0003 ; and
WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the Developer
awarded the day of , 202 wwhich Contract is hereby referred to and
a made part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, to furnish all materials, equipment
labor and other accessories as defined by law, in the prosecution of the Work, including any
Work resulting from a duly authorized Change Order (collectively herein, the "Work") as
provided for in said Contract and designated as Water, Sanitary Sewer, Paving, Street Lights
and Drainage Improvements for Tradition Central Phase 1B, and;
WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to use such materials and to so construct the Work in
accordance with the plans, specifications and Contract Documents that the Work is and will
remain free from defects in materials or workmanship for and during the period of two (2) years
after the date of Final Acceptance of the Work by the City ("Maintenance Period"); and
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1 B
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised January 31, 2012
006219-2
MAINTENANCE BOND
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, Principal binds itself to repair or reconstruct the Work in whole or in part
upon receiving notice from the Developer and/or City of the need thereof at any time within the
Maintenance Period.
NOW THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if Principal shall
remedy any defective Work, for which timely notice was provided by Developer or City, to a
completion satisfactory to the City, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise to
remain in full force and effect.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, if Principal shall fail so to repair or reconstruct any timely
noticed defective Work, it is agreed that the Developer or City may cause any and all such
defective Work to be repaired and/or reconstructed with all associated costs thereof being borne
by the Principal and the Surety under this Maintenance Bond; and
PROVIDED FURTHER, that if any legal action be filed on this Bond, venue shall lie in
Tarrant County, Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort
Worth Division; and
PROVIDED FURTHER, that this obligation shall be continuous in nature and
successive recoveries may be had hereon for successive breaches.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 111
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised January 31, 2012
006219-3
MAINTENANCE BOND
Page 3 of 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have each SIGNED and SEALED this
instrument by duly authorized agents and officers on this the day of ..2020.
ATTEST:
AZ& I
(Principal) Secretary
tWiess4tr�;,-_Oal
ATTEST:
(Sure�)e7ry
Wi ss s to Surety
PRINCIPAL:
Conatser Construction TX, L.P.
BY: v�
Signature
Brock Huggins, President
Name and Title
Address: 5327 Wichita St.
Ft. Worth. TX 76119
SURETY:
Berkley Insurance Company
BY: --
Signature
Robbi Morales, Attorney -in -fact
Name and Title
Address: 5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75244
Telephone Number: 214/989-0000
*Note: If signed by an officer of the Surety Company, there must be on file a certified extract
from the by-laws showing that this person has authority to sign such obligation. If
Surety's physical address is different from its mailing address, both must be provided.
The date of the bond shall not be prior to the date the Contract is awarded.
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1 B
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS — DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project 4102509
Revised January 31, 2012
No. BI-7280j
POWER OF ATTORNEY
BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE
NOTICE: The warning found elsewhere in this Power of Attorney affects the validity thereof. Please review carefully.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Company"), a corporation duly
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal office in Greenwich, CT, has made, constituted
and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint: Ricardo J. Reyna; Don E. Cornell; Sophinie Hunter;
.ERobbi Morales; Kelly A. Westbrook; Tina McEwan; Joshua A. Saunders; or Tonle Petranek of Aon Risk Services Southwest,
'-'Inc. of Dallas, TX its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact, to sign its name as surety only as delineated below and to execute, seal,
acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds and undertakings, with the exception of Financial Guaranty Insurance, providing that no
single obligation shall exceed Fifty Million and 00/100 U.S. Dollars (U.S.$50,000,000.00), to the same extent as if such bonds
-':'had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its principal office in their own
=proper persons.
a
This Power of Attorney shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware,
o without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. This Power of Attorney is granted pursuant to the following
resolutions which were duly and validly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on January 25, 2010:
•� o
RESOLVED, that, with respect to the Surety business written by Berkley Surety, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, President or any Vice President of the Company, in conjunction with the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary are
o° hereby authorized to execute powers of attorney authorizing and qualifying the attorney -in -fact named therein to execute
bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or other suretyship obligations on behalf of the Company, and to affix the corporate seal
o' of the Company to powers of attorney executed pursuant hereto; and said officers may remove any such attorney -in -fact and
Q., 2 revoke any power of attorney previously granted; and further
RESOLVED, that such power of attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or
F" other suretyship obligations specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner
i.
and to the extent therein stated; and further
Z RESOLVED, that such power of attorney revokes all previous powers issued on behalf of the attorney -in -fact named; and
further
o �
:a, .E RESOLVED, that the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any
power of attorney or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or
3 other suretyship obligation of the Company; and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as
though manually affixed. The Company may continue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any
person or persons who shall have been such officer or officers of the Company, notwithstanding the fact that they may have
ceased to be such at the time when such instruments shall be issued.
0 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Com any has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its
o tocorporate seal hereunto affixed this' day of M p 04
a�
Attest: / Berkle Insurance Cornpan
o F~ (Sea!) By r By
. d Ira Led an Jef ffter
o Executive Vice President & Secretary en o i •esident
U O
b WARNING: THIS POWER INVALID IF NOT PRINTED ON BLUE "BERKLEY" SECURITY PAPER.
o �
a STATE OF CONNECTICUT )
o COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD }
o � !
y Sworn to before me, a Notary Public in the State of Connecticut, this,9J daof tW I Q , by Ira S. Lederman
and Jeffrey M. I-Iafter who are sworn to me to be the Executive Vice PZ'end Secretary, n the Senior Vice President,
respectively, of Berkley Insurance ComparfOARIA G. RUNDBAKENNOTARY PUBLIC�MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Public, State of Connecticut
Z APRIL 30, 2019
CERTIFICATE
Z EI, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a tare, correct
04 0 and complete copy of the original Power of Attorney, that said Power of Attorney has not been revoked or rescinded and that the authority of the
3 Attorney -in -Fact set forth therein, who executed the bond or undertaking to which this Power of Attorney is attached, is in full force and effect as
of this date. l �l ,17
Given under my hand and seal of the Company, this day of
(Seal)
V m ent . Forte
IMPORTANT NOTICE
To obtain information or make a complaint:
You may call Berkley Surety Group, LLC and its affiliates by
telephone for information or to make a complaint:
BERKLEY SURETY GROUP, LLC
Please send all notices of claim on this bond to:
Berkley Surety Group, LLC
(866) 768-3534
412 Mount Kemble Avenue, Suite 31ON
Morristown, NJ 07960
Attn: Surety Claims Department
You may contact the Texas Department of Insurance to obtain
information on companies, coverages, rights or complaints at:
1-800-252-3439
You may write the Texas Department of Insurance:
P. O. Box 149104
Austin, TX 78714-9104
Fax: (512) 475-1771
Web: htt ://www.tdi.state.tx.us
E-mail: ConsumerProtection a tdi.state.tx.us
PREMIUM OR CLAIM DISPUTES:
Should you have a dispute concerning your premium or about a claim
you should contact your agent or Berkley Surety Group, LLC first. If
the dispute is not resolved, you may contact the Texas Department of
Insurance.
ATTACH THIS NOTICE TO YOUR BOND:
This notice is for information only and does not become a part or
condition of the attached document and is given to comply with Texas
legal and regulatory requirements.
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS
OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS OF THE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Article 1 – Definitions and Terminology .......................................................................................................... 1
1.01 Defined Terms ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.02 Terminology .................................................................................................................................. 5
Article 2 – Preliminary Matters ......................................................................................................................... 6
2.01 Before Starting Construction ........................................................................................................ 6
2.02 Preconstruction Conference .......................................................................................................... 6
2.03 Public Meeting .............................................................................................................................. 6
Article 3 – Contract Documents and Amending ............................................................................................... 6
3.01 Reference Standards ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents .................................................................. 6
Article 4 – Bonds and Insurance ....................................................................................................................... 7
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers ..................................................................................................... 7
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds ........................................................................ 7
4.03 Certificates of Insurance ............................................................................................................... 7
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance .................................................................................................................. 9
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace ........................................................... 12
Article 5 – Contractor’s Responsibilities ........................................................................................................ 12
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent ................................................................................................. 12
5.02 Labor; Working Hours ................................................................................................................ 13
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment ........................................................................................... 13
5.04 Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 14
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals” ....................................................................................................... 14
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors) ..................................... 16
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others ................................................................... 16
5.08 Wage Rates.................................................................................................................................. 18
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties ........................................................................................................... 19
5.10 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................................. 19
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas ....................................................................................................... 19
5.12 Record Documents ...................................................................................................................... 20
5.13 Safety and Protection .................................................................................................................. 21
5.14 Safety Representative ................................................................................................................. 21
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs ............................................................................................. 22
5.16 Submittals .................................................................................................................................... 22
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee .......................................................................... 23
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.18 Indemnification ........................................................................................................................... 24
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services .............................................................................. 24
5.20 Right to Audit: ............................................................................................................................ 25
5.21 Nondiscrimination....................................................................................................................... 25
Article 6 – Other Work at the Site ................................................................................................................... 26
6.01 Related Work at Site ................................................................................................................... 26
Article 7 – City’s Responsibilities................................................................................................................... 26
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals .............................................................................................. 26
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities ....................................................................................... 26
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program ............................................................................................... 27
Article 8 – City’s Observation Status During Construction ........................................................................... 27
8.01 City’s Project Representative ..................................................................................................... 27
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work .................................................................................................. 27
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work .......................................................................................................... 27
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed .......................................................................................... 28
Article 9 – Changes in the Work ..................................................................................................................... 28
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work ............................................................................................... 28
9.02 Notification to Surety .................................................................................................................. 28
Article 10 – Change of Contract Price; Change of Contract Time ................................................................ 28
10.01 Change of Contract Price ............................................................................................................ 28
10.02 Change of Contract Time............................................................................................................ 28
10.03 Delays .......................................................................................................................................... 28
Article 11 – Tests and Inspections; Correction, Removal or Acceptance of Defective Work ...................... 29
11.01 Notice of Defects ........................................................................................................................ 29
11.02 Access to Work ........................................................................................................................... 29
11.03 Tests and Inspections .................................................................................................................. 29
11.04 Uncovering Work ....................................................................................................................... 30
11.05 City May Stop the Work ............................................................................................................. 30
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work ................................................................................ 30
11.07 Correction Period ........................................................................................................................ 30
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work ............................................................................................. 31
Article 12 – Completion .................................................................................................................................. 32
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title ................................................................................................... 32
12.02 Partial Utilization ........................................................................................................................ 32
12.03 Final Inspection ........................................................................................................................... 32
12.04 Final Acceptance ......................................................................................................................... 33
Article 13 – Suspension of Work .................................................................................................................... 33
13.01 City May Suspend Work ............................................................................................................ 33
Article 14 – Miscellaneous .............................................................................................................................. 34
14.01 Giving Notice .............................................................................................................................. 34
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.02 Computation of Times ................................................................................................................ 34
14.03 Cumulative Remedies ................................................................................................................. 34
14.04 Survival of Obligations ............................................................................................................... 35
14.05 Headings ...................................................................................................................................... 35
00 73 10- 1
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 1 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 1 – DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY
1.01 Defined Terms
A. Wherever used in these General Conditions or in other Contract Documents, the terms listed
below have the meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof,
and words denoting gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter. Said terms are
generally capitalized or written in italics, but not always. When used in a context consistent with
the definition of a listed-defined term, the term shall have a meaning as defined below whether
capitalized or italicized or otherwise. In addition to terms specifically defined, terms with initial
capital letters in the Contract Documents include references to identified articles and paragraphs,
and the titles of other documents or forms.
1. Agreement - The written instrument which is evidence of the agreement between Developer
and Contractor covering the Work
2. Asbestos—Any material that contains more than one percent asbestos and is friable or is
releasing asbestos fibers into the air above current action levels established by the United
States Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3. Business Day – A business day is defined as a day that the City conducts normal business,
generally Monday through Friday, except for federal or state holidays observed by the City.
4. Buzzsaw – City’s on-line, electronic document management and collaboration system.
5. Calendar Day – A day consisting of 24 hours measured from midnight to the next midnight.
6. City— The City of Fort Worth, Texas, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, acting by,
its governing body through its City Manager, his designee, or agents authorized pursuant to
its duly authorized charter on his behalf.
7. Community Facilities Agreement (CFA) -–A Contract between the Developer and the City
for the Construction of one or more following public facilities within the City public right-of-
way or easement: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Street, Storm Drain, Street Light, and Street Signs.
A CFA may include private facilities within the right-of-way dedicated as private right-of-
way or easement on a recorded plat.
8. Contract—The entire and integrated written document incorporating the Contract
Documents between the Developer, Contractor, and/or City concerning the Work. The
Contract supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or
oral.
9. Contract Documents—Those items that make up the contract and which must include the
Agreement, and it’s attachments such as standard construction specifications, standard City
Conditions, other general conditions of the Developer, including:
a. An Agreement
00 73 10- 2
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 2 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
b. Attachments to the Agreement
i. Bid Form
ii. Vendor Compliance with State Law Non-Resident Bidder
iii. Prequalification Statement
c. Current Prevailing Wage Rates Table (if required by City)
d. Insurance Accord Form
e. Payment Bond
f. Performance Bond
g. Maintenance Bond
h. Power of Attorney for Bonds
i. Workers Compensation Affidavit
j. MWBE Commitment Form( If required by City)
k. General Conditions
l. Supplementary Conditions
m. The Standard City Conditions
n. Specifications specifically made part of the Contract Documents by attachment, if
not attached, as incorporated by reference and described in the Table of Contents of
the Project’s Contract Documents
o. Drawings
p. Documentation submitted by contractor prior to Notice of Award.
q. The following which may be delivered or issued after the effective date if the
Agreement and, if issued become an incorporated part of the Contract Documents
i. Notice to Proceed
ii. Field Orders
iii. Change Orders
iv. Letters of Final Acceptance
r. Approved Submittals, other Contractor submittals, and the reports and drawings of
subsurface and physical conditions are not Contract Documents.
10. Contractor—The individual or entity with whom Developer has entered into the Agreement.
11. Day or day – A day, unless otherwise defined, shall mean a Calendar Day.
12. Developer – An individual or entity that desires to make certain improvements within the
City of Fort Worth
13. Drawings—That part of the Contract Documents prepared or approved by Engineer which
graphically shows the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed by
Contractor. Submittals are not Drawings as so defined.
14. Engineer—The licensed professional engineer or engineering firm registered in the State of
Texas performing professional services for the Developer.
15. Final Acceptance – The written notice given by the City to the Developer and/or Contractor
that the Work specified in the Contract Documents has been completed to the satisfaction of
the City.
00 73 10- 3
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 3 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
16. Final Inspection – Inspection carried out by the City to verify that the Contractor has
completed the Work, and each and every part or appurtenance thereof, fully, entirely, and in
conformance with the Contract Documents.
17. General Requirements—A part of the Contract Documents between the Developer and a
Contractor.
18. Laws and Regulations—Any and all applicable laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes,
and orders of any and all governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts having
jurisdiction.
19. Liens—Charges, security interests, or encumbrances upon Project funds, real property, or
personal property.
20. Milestone—A principal event specified in the Contract Documents relating to an
intermediate Contract Time prior to Final Acceptance of the Work.
21. Non-Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and reviewed by the
City, which is signed by Contractor, and Developer, and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
22. Participating Change Order—A document, which is prepared for and approved by the City,
which is signed by Contractor, Developer, and City and authorizes an addition, deletion, or
revision in the Work or an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract Time, issued on
or after the Effective Date of the Agreement.
23. Plans – See definition of Drawings.
24. Project Schedule—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, in accordance with
the General Requirements, describing the sequence and duration of the activities comprising
the Contractor’s plan to accomplish the Work within the Contract Time.
25. Project—The Work to be performed under the Contract Documents.
26. Project Representative—The authorized representative of the City who will be assigned to
the Site.
27. Public Meeting – An announced meeting conducted by the Developer to facilitate public
participation and to assist the public in gaining an informed view of the Project.
28. Regular Working Hours – Hours beginning at 7:00 a.m. and ending at 6:00 p.m., Monday
thru Friday (excluding legal holidays).
29. Samples—Physical examples of materials, equipment, or workmanship that are
representative of some portion of the Work and which establish the standards by which such
portion of the Work will be judged.
00 73 10- 4
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 4 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
30. Schedule of Submittals—A schedule, prepared and maintained by Contractor, of required
submittals and the time requirements to support scheduled performance of related
construction activities.
31. Site—Lands or areas indicated in the Contract Documents as being furnished by City or
Developer upon which the Work is to be performed, including rights-of-way, permits, and
easements for access thereto, and such other lands furnished by City or Developer which are
designated for the use of Contractor.
32. Specifications—That part of the Contract Documents consisting of written requirements for
materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship as applied to the Work, and
certain administrative requirements and procedural matters applicable thereto.
Specifications may be specifically made a part of the Contract Documents by attachment or,
if not attached, may be incorporated by reference as indicated in the Table of Contents
(Division 00 00 00) of each Project.
33. Standard City Conditions – That part of the Contract Documents setting forth requirements
of the City.
34. Subcontractor—An individual or entity having a direct contract with Contractor or with any
other Subcontractor for the performance of a part of the Work at the Site.
35. Submittals—All drawings, diagrams, illustrations, schedules, and other data or information
which are specifically prepared or assembled by or for Contractor and submitted by
Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work.
36. Superintendent – The representative of the Contractor who is available at all times and able
to receive instructions from the City and/or Developer and to act for the Contractor.
37. Supplementary Conditions—That part of the Contract Documents which amends or
supplements the General Conditions.
38. Supplier—A manufacturer, fabricator, supplier, distributor, materialman, or vendor having
a direct contract with Contractor or with any Subcontractor to furnish materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work by Contractor or Subcontractor.
39. Underground Facilities—All underground pipelines, conduits, ducts, cables, wires,
manholes, vaults, tanks, tunnels, or other such facilities or attachments, and any
encasements containing such facilities, including but not limited to, those that convey
electricity, gases, steam, liquid petroleum products, telephone or other communications,
cable television, water, wastewater, storm water, other liquids or chemicals, or traffic or
other control systems.
40. Weekend Working Hours – Hours beginning at 9:00 a.m. and ending at 5:00 p.m., Saturday,
Sunday or legal holiday, as approved in advance by the City.
00 73 10- 5
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 5 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
41. Work—The entire construction or the various separately identifiable parts thereof required
to be provided under the Contract Documents. Work includes and is the result of performing
or providing all labor, services, and documentation necessary to produce such construction
including any Participating Change Order, Non-Participating Change Order, or Field
Order, and furnishing, installing, and incorporating all materials and equipment into such
construction, all as required by the Contract Documents.
42. Working Day – A working day is defined as a day, not including Saturdays, Sundays, or
legal holidays authorized by the City for contract purposes, in which weather or other
conditions not under the control of the Contractor will permit the performance of the
principal unit of work underway for a continuous period of not less than 7 hours between 7
a.m. and 6 p.m.
1.02 Terminology
A. The words and terms discussed in Paragraph 1.02.B through D are not defined but, when used in
the Bidding Requirements or Contract Documents, have the indicated meaning.
B. Defective:
1. The word “defective,” when modifying the word “Work,” refers to Work that is
unsatisfactory, faulty, or deficient in that it:
a. does not conform to the Contract Documents; or
b. does not meet the requirements of any applicable inspection, reference standard, test, or
approval referred to in the Contract Documents; or
c. has been damaged prior to City’s written acceptance.
C. Furnish, Install, Perform, Provide:
1. The word “Furnish” or the word “Install” or the word “Perform” or the word “Provide” or
the word “Supply,” or any combination or similar directive or usage thereof, shall mean
furnishing and incorporating in the Work including all necessary labor, materials, equipment,
and everything necessary to perform the Work indicated, unless specifically limited in the
context used.
D. Unless stated otherwise in the Contract Documents, words or phrases that have a well-known
technical or construction industry or trade meaning are used in the Contract Documents in
accordance with such recognized meaning.
00 73 10- 6
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 6 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 2 – PRELIMINARY MATTERS
2.01 Before Starting Construction
Baseline Schedules: Submit to City in accordance with the Contract Documents, and prior to starting
the Work. New schedules will be submitted to City when Participating Change Orders or Non-
Participating Change Orders occur.
2.02 Preconstruction Conference
Before any Work at the Site is started, the Contractor shall attend a Preconstruction Conference as
specified in the Contract Documents.
2.03 Public Meeting
Contractor may not mobilize any equipment, materials or resources to the Site prior to Contractor
attending the Public Meeting as scheduled by the City.
ARTICLE 3 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND AMENDING
3.01 Reference Standards
A. Standards, Specifications, Codes, Laws, and Regulations
1. Reference to standards, specifications, manuals, or codes of any technical society,
organization, or association, or to Laws or Regulations, whether such reference be specific or
by implication, shall mean the standard, specification, manual, code, or Laws or Regulations
in effect at the time of opening of Bids (or on the Effective Date of the Agreement if there
were no Bids), except as may be otherwise specifically stated in the Contract Documents.
2. No provision or instruction shall be effective to assign to City, or any of its officers,
directors, members, partners, employees, agents, consultants, or subcontractors, any duty or
authority to supervise or direct the performance of the Work or any duty or authority to
undertake responsibility inconsistent with the provisions of the Contract Documents.
3.02 Amending and Supplementing Contract Documents
A. The Contract Documents may be amended to provide for additions, deletions, and revisions in
the Work or to modify the terms and conditions thereof by a Participating Change Order or a
Non-Participating Change Order.
B. The requirements of the Contract Documents may be supplemented, and minor variations and
deviations in the Work not involving a change in Contract Price or Contract Time, may be
authorized, by one or more of the following ways:
1. A Field Order;
00 73 10- 7
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 7 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. City’s or Engineer’s review of a Submittal (subject to the provisions of Paragraph 5.16.C); or
2. City’s written interpretation or clarification.
ARTICLE 4 – BONDS AND INSURANCE
4.01 Licensed Sureties and Insurers
All bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents to be purchased and maintained by
Contractor shall be obtained from surety or insurance companies that are duly licensed or authorized
in the State of Texas to issue bonds or insurance policies for the limits and coverage so required.
Such surety and insurance companies shall also meet such additional requirements and qualifications
as may be provided Section 4.04.
4.02 Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bonds
A. Contractor shall furnish performance and payment bonds in the name of Developer and City, in
accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 2253 or successor statute, each in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security for the faithful performance and payment of all of
Contractor’s obligations under the Contract Documents.
B. Contractor shall furnish maintenance bonds in the name of Developer and City in an amount
equal to the Contract Price as security to protect the City against any defects in any portion of the
Work described in the Contract Documents. Maintenance bonds shall remain in effect for two
(2) years after the date of Final Acceptance by the City.
C. All bonds shall be in the form prescribed by the Contract Documents except as provided
otherwise by Laws or Regulations, and shall be executed by such sureties as are named in the list
of “Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and
as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies” as published in Circular 570 (amended) by the Financial
Management Service, Surety Bond Branch, U.S. Department of the Treasury. All bonds signed
by an agent or attorney-in-fact must be accompanied by a sealed and dated power of attorney
which shall show that it is effective on the date the agent or attorney-in-fact signed each bond.
D. If the surety on any bond furnished by Contractor is declared bankrupt or becomes insolvent or
its right to do business is terminated in the State of Texas or it ceases to meet the requirements of
Paragraph 4.02.C, Contractor shall promptly notify City and shall, within 30 days after the event
giving rise to such notification, provide another bond and surety, both of which shall comply
with the requirements of Paragraphs 4.01 and 4.02.C.
4.03 Certificates of Insurance
Contractor shall deliver to Developer and City, with copies to each additional insured and loss payee
identified in these Standard City Conditions certificates of insurance (and other evidence of
insurance requested by City or any other additional insured) which Contractor is required to
purchase and maintain.
00 73 10- 8
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 8 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. The certificate of insurance shall document the City, an as “Additional Insured” on all
liability policies.
2. The Contractor’s general liability insurance shall include a, “per project” or “per location”,
endorsement, which shall be identified in the certificate of insurance provided to the City.
3. The certificate shall be signed by an agent authorized to bind coverage on behalf of the
insured, be complete in its entirety, and show complete insurance carrier names as listed in
the current A.M. Best Property & Casualty Guide
4. The insurers for all policies must be licensed and/or approved to do business in the State of
Texas. Except for workers’ compensation, all insurers must have a minimum rating of A-:
VII in the current A. M. Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial
strength and solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management. If the rating is below that
required, written approval of City is required.
5. All applicable policies shall include a Waiver of Subrogation (Rights of Recovery) in favor
of the City. In addition, the Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the
Engineer (if applicable), and each additional insured identified in these Standard City
Conditions. Failure of the City to demand such certificates or other evidence of full
compliance with the insurance requirements or failure of the City to identify a deficiency
from evidence that is provided shall not be construed as a waiver of Contractor’s obligation
to maintain such lines of insurance coverage.
6. If insurance policies are not written for specified coverage limits, an Umbrella or Excess
Liability insurance for any differences is required. Excess Liability shall follow form of the
primary coverage.
7. Unless otherwise stated, all required insurance shall be written on the “occurrence basis”. If
coverage is underwritten on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall be coincident with
or prior to the date of the effective date of the agreement and the certificate of insurance shall
state that the coverage is claims-made and the retroactive date. The insurance coverage shall
be maintained for the duration of the Contract and for three (3) years following Final
Acceptance provided under the Contract Documents or for the warranty period, whichever is
longer. An annual certificate of insurance submitted to the City shall evidence such
insurance coverage.
8. Policies shall have no exclusions by endorsements, which, neither nullify or amend, the
required lines of coverage, nor decrease the limits of said coverage unless such endorsements
are approved in writing by the City. In the event a Contract has been bid or executed and the
exclusions are determined to be unacceptable or the City desires additional insurance
coverage, and the City desires the contractor/engineer to obtain such coverage, the contract
price shall be adjusted by the cost of the premium for such additional coverage plus 10%.
9. Any self-insured retention (SIR), in excess of $25,000.00, affecting required insurance
coverage shall be approved by the City in regards to asset value and stockholders' equity. In
00 73 10- 9
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 9 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
lieu of traditional insurance, alternative coverage maintained through insurance pools or risk
retention groups, must also be approved by City.
10. Any deductible in excess of $5,000.00, for any policy that does not provide coverage on a
first-dollar basis, must be acceptable to and approved by the City.
11. City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to review the insurance requirements and to
make reasonable adjustments to insurance coverage’s and their limits when deemed
necessary and prudent by the City based upon changes in statutory law, court decision or the
claims history of the industry as well as of the contracting party to the City. The City shall
be required to provide prior notice of 90 days, and the insurance adjustments shall be
incorporated into the Work by Change Order.
12. City shall be entitled, upon written request and without expense, to receive copies of policies
and endorsements thereto and may make any reasonable requests for deletion or revision or
modifications of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions necessary to
conform the policy and endorsements to the requirements of the Contract. Deletions,
revisions, or modifications shall not be required where policy provisions are established by
law or regulations binding upon either party or the underwriter on any such policies.
13. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for
Contractor’s insurance.
4.04 Contractor’s Insurance
A. Workers Compensation and Employers’ Liability. Contractor shall purchase and maintain such
insurance coverage with limits consistent with statutory benefits outlined in the Texas Workers’
Compensation Act (Texas Labor Code, Ch. 406, as amended), and minimum limits for
Employers’ Liability as is appropriate for the Work being performed and as will provide
protection from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from Contractor’s
performance of the Work and Contractor’s other obligations under the Contract Documents,
whether it is to be performed by Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by anyone directly
or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone for whose acts
any of them may be liable:
1. claims under workers’ compensation, disability benefits, and other similar employee benefit
acts;
2. claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of
Contractor’s employees.
3. The limits of liability for the insurance shall provide the following coverages for not less
than the following amounts or greater where required by Laws and Regulations
a. Statutory limits
b. Employer's liability
00 73 10- 10
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 10 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1) $100,000 each accident/occurrence
2) $100,000 Disease - each employee
3) $500,000 Disease - policy limit
B. Commercial General Liability. Coverage shall include but not be limited to covering liability
(bodily injury or property damage) arising from: premises/operations, independent contractors,
products/completed operations, personal injury, and liability under an insured contract. Insurance
shall be provided on an occurrence basis, and as comprehensive as the current Insurance
Services Office (ISO) policy. This insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to
any other insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the City. The Commercial General
Liability policy, shall have no exclusions by endorsements that would alter of nullify
premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual, personal injury, or advertising
injury, which are normally contained with the policy, unless the City approves such exclusions
in writing.
1. For construction projects that present a substantial completed operation exposure, the City
may require the contractor to maintain completed operations coverage for a minimum of no
less than three (3) years following the completion of the project
2. Contractor's Liability Insurance under this Section which shall be on a per project basis
covering the Contractor with minimum limits of:
a. $1,000,000 each occurrence
b. $2,000,000 aggregate limit
3. The policy must have an endorsement (Amendment – Aggregate Limits of Insurance)
making the General Aggregate Limits apply separately to each job site.
4. The Commercial General Liability Insurance policies shall provide “X”, “C”, and “U”
coverage’s. Verification of such coverage must be shown in the Remarks Article of the
Certificate of Insurance.
C. Automobile Liability. A commercial business auto policy shall provide coverage on “any auto”,
defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned and provide indemnity for claims for damages
because bodily injury or death of any person and or property damage arising out of the work,
maintenance or use of any motor vehicle by the Contractor, any Subcontractor or Supplier, or by
anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the Work, or by anyone
for whose acts any of them may be liable.
1. Automobile Liability, Contractor’s Liability Insurance under this Section, which shall be in
an amount not less than the following amounts:
a. Automobile Liability - a commercial business policy shall provide coverage on "Any
Auto", defined as autos owned, hired and non-owned.
00 73 10- 11
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 11 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1) $1,000,000 each accident on a combined single limit basis. Split limits are
acceptable if limits are at least:
2) $250,000 Bodily Injury per person
3) $500,000 Bodily Injury per accident /
4) $100,000 Property Damage
D. Railroad Protective Liability. If any of the work or any warranty work is within the limits of
railroad right-of-way, the Contractor shall comply with the following requirements:
1. The Contractor’s construction activities will require its employees, agents, subcontractors,
equipment, and material deliveries to cross railroad properties and tracks owned and
operated by: ____________________________________________________________
Write the name of the railroad company. (If none, then write none)
2. The Contractor shall conduct its operations on railroad properties in such a manner as not to
interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the railroad company in any manner whatsoever in the use
or operation of its/their trains or other property. Such operations on railroad properties may
require that Contractor to execute a “Right of Entry Agreement” with the particular railroad
company or companies involved, and to this end the Contractor should satisfy itself as to the
requirements of each railroad company and be prepared to execute the right-of-entry (if any)
required by a railroad company. The requirements specified herein likewise relate to the
Contractor’s use of private and/or construction access roads crossing said railroad company’s
properties.
3. The Contractual Liability coverage required by Paragraph 5.04D of the General Conditions
shall provide coverage for not less than the following amounts, issued by companies
satisfactory to the City and to the Railroad Company for a term that continues for so long as
the Contractor’s operations and work cross, occupy, or touch railroad property:
a. General Aggregate: _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
b. Each Occurrence: : _____________________________________
Enter limits provided by Railroad Company (If none, write none)
4. With respect to the above outlined insurance requirements, the following shall govern:
a. Where a single railroad company is involved, the Contractor shall provide one insurance
policy in the name of the railroad company. However, if more than one grade separation
or at-grade crossing is affected by the Project at entirely separate locations on the line or
lines of the same railroad company, separate coverage may be required, each in the
amount stated above.
b. Where more than one railroad company is operating on the same right-of-way or where
several railroad companies are involved and operated on their own separate rights-of-
00 73 10- 12
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 12 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
way, the Contractor may be required to provide separate insurance policies in the name
of each railroad company.
c. If, in addition to a grade separation or an at-grade crossing, other work or activity is
proposed on a railroad company’s right-of-way at a location entirely separate from the
grade separation or at-grade crossing, insurance coverage for this work must be included
in the policy covering the grade separation.
d. If no grade separation is involved but other work is proposed on a railroad company’s
right-of-way, all such other work may be covered in a single policy for that railroad, even
though the work may be at two or more separate locations.
5. No work or activities on a railroad company’s property to be performed by the Contractor
shall be commenced until the Contractor has furnished the City with an original policy or
policies of the insurance for each railroad company named, as required above. All such
insurance must be approved by the City and each affected Railroad Company prior to the
Contractor’s beginning work.
6. The insurance specified above must be carried until all Work to be performed on the railroad
right-of-way has been completed and the grade crossing, if any, is no longer used by the
Contractor. In addition, insurance must be carried during all maintenance and/or repair work
performed in the railroad right-of-way. Such insurance must name the railroad company as
the insured, together with any tenant or lessee of the railroad company operating over tracks
involved in the Project.
E. Notification of Policy Cancellation: Contractor shall immediately notify City upon cancellation
or other loss of insurance coverage. Contractor shall stop work until replacement insurance has
been procured. There shall be no time credit for days not worked pursuant to this section.
4.05 Acceptance of Bonds and Insurance; Option to Replace
If City has any objection to the coverage afforded by or other provisions of the bonds or insurance
required to be purchased and maintained by the Contractor in accordance with Article 5 on the basis
of non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the Developer and City shall so notify the
Contractor in writing within 10 Business Days after receipt of the certificates (or other evidence
requested). Contractor shall provide to the City such additional information in respect of insurance
provided as the Developer or City may reasonably request. If Contractor does not purchase or
maintain all of the bonds and insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Developer or City
shall notify the Contractor in writing of such failure prior to the start of the Work, or of such failure
to maintain prior to any change in the required coverage.
ARTICLE 5 – CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES
5.01 Supervision and Superintendent
A. Contractor shall supervise, inspect, and direct the Work competently and efficiently, devoting
such attention thereto and applying such skills and expertise as may be necessary to perform the
00 73 10- 13
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 13 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the
means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction.
B. At all times during the progress of the Work, Contractor shall assign a competent, English-
speaking, Superintendent who shall not be replaced without written notice to City. The
Superintendent will be Contractor’s representative at the Site and shall have authority to act on
behalf of Contractor. All communication given to or received from the Superintendent shall be
binding on Contractor.
C. Contractor shall notify the City 24 hours prior to moving areas during the sequence of
construction.
5.02 Labor; Working Hours
A. Contractor shall provide competent, suitably qualified personnel to perform construction as
required by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall at all times maintain good discipline and
order at the Site.
B. Except as otherwise required for the safety or protection of persons or the Work or property at
the Site or adjacent thereto, and except as otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, all Work
at the Site shall be performed during Regular Working Hours. Contractor will not permit the
performance of Work beyond Regular Working Hours or for Weekend Working Hours without
City’s written consent (which will not be unreasonably withheld). Written request (by letter or
electronic communication) to perform Work:
1. for beyond Regular Working Hours request must be made by noon at least two (2) Business
Days prior
2. for Weekend Working Hours request must be made by noon of the preceding Thursday
3. for legal holidays request must be made by noon two Business Days prior to the legal
holiday.
5.03 Services, Materials, and Equipment
A. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, Contractor shall provide and assume full
responsibility for all services, materials, equipment, labor, transportation, construction
equipment and machinery, tools, appliances, fuel, power, light, heat, telephone, water, sanitary
facilities, temporary facilities, and all other facilities and incidentals necessary for the
performance, Contractor required testing, start-up, and completion of the Work.
B. All materials and equipment incorporated into the Work shall be as specified or, if not specified,
shall be of good quality and new, except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents. All
special warranties and guarantees required by the Specifications shall expressly run to the benefit
of City. If required by City, Contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence (including reports of
required tests) as to the source, kind, and quality of materials and equipment.
00 73 10- 14
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 14 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. All materials and equipment to be incorporated into the Work shall be stored, applied, installed,
connected, erected, protected, used, cleaned, and conditioned in accordance with instructions of
the applicable Supplier, except as otherwise may be provided in the Contract Documents.
5.04 Project Schedule
A. Contractor shall adhere to the Project Schedule established in accordance with Paragraph 2.01
and the General Requirements as it may be adjusted from time to time as provided below.
1. Contractor shall submit to City for acceptance (to the extent indicated in Paragraph 2.01 and
the General Requirements) proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule.
2. Proposed adjustments in the Project Schedule that will change the Contract Time shall be
submitted in accordance with the requirements of Article 9. Adjustments in Contract Time
for projects with City participation shall be made by participating change orders.
5.05 Substitutes and “Or-Equals”
A. Whenever an item of material or equipment is specified or described in the Contract Documents
by using the name of a proprietary item or the name of a particular Supplier, the specification or
description is intended to establish the type, function, appearance, and quality required. Unless
the specification or description contains or is followed by words reading that no like, equivalent,
or “or-equal” item or no substitution is permitted, other items of material or equipment of other
Suppliers may be submitted to City for review under the circumstances described below.
1. “Or-Equal” Items: If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by
Contractor is functionally equal to that named and sufficiently similar so that no change in
related Work will be required, it may be considered by City as an “or-equal” item, in which
case review and approval of the proposed item may, in City’s sole discretion, be
accomplished without compliance with some or all of the requirements for approval of
proposed substitute items. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5.05.A.1, a proposed item of
material or equipment will be considered functionally equal to an item so named if:
a. City determines that:
1) it is at least equal in materials of construction, quality, durability, appearance,
strength, and design characteristics;
2) it will reliably perform at least equally well the function and achieve the results
imposed by the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole; and
3) it has a proven record of performance and availability of responsive service; and
b. Contractor certifies that, if approved and incorporated into the Work:
1) there will be no increase in cost to the City or increase in Contract Time; and
00 73 10- 15
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 15 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2) it will conform substantially to the detailed requirements of the item named in the
Contract Documents.
2. Substitute Items:
a. If in City’s sole discretion an item of material or equipment proposed by Contractor does
not qualify as an “or-equal” item under Paragraph 5.05.A.1, it may be submitted as a
proposed substitute item.
b. Contractor shall submit sufficient information as provided below to allow City to
determine if the item of material or equipment proposed is essentially equivalent to that
named and an acceptable substitute therefor. Requests for review of proposed substitute
items of material or equipment will not be accepted by City from anyone other than
Contractor.
c. Contractor shall make written application to City for review of a proposed substitute item
of material or equipment that Contractor seeks to furnish or use. The application shall
comply with Section 01 25 00 and:
1) shall certify that the proposed substitute item will:
i. perform adequately the functions and achieve the results called for by the general
design;
ii. be similar in substance to that specified;
iii. be suited to the same use as that specified; and
2) will state:
i. the extent, if any, to which the use of the proposed substitute item will prejudice
Contractor’s achievement of final completion on time;
ii. whether use of the proposed substitute item in the Work will require a change in
any of the Contract Documents (or in the provisions of any other direct contract
with City for other work on the Project) to adapt the design to the proposed
substitute item;
iii. whether incorporation or use of the proposed substitute item in connection with
the Work is subject to payment of any license fee or royalty; and
3) will identify:
i. all variations of the proposed substitute item from that specified;
ii. available engineering, sales, maintenance, repair, and replacement services; and
00 73 10- 16
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 16 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
4) shall contain an itemized estimate of all costs or credits that will result directly or
indirectly from use of such substitute item, including costs of redesign and Damage
Claims of other contractors affected by any resulting change.
B. Substitute Construction Methods or Procedures: If a specific means, method, technique,
sequence, or procedure of construction is expressly required by the Contract Documents,
Contractor may furnish or utilize a substitute means, method, technique, sequence, or procedure
of construction approved by City. Contractor shall submit sufficient information to allow City, in
City’s sole discretion, to determine that the substitute proposed is equivalent to that expressly
called for by the Contract Documents. Contractor shall make written application to City for
review in the same manner as those provided in Paragraph 5.05.A.2.
C. City’s Evaluation: City will be allowed a reasonable time within which to evaluate each
proposal or submittal made pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A and 5.05.B. City may require
Contractor to furnish additional data about the proposed substitute. City will be the sole judge of
acceptability. No “or-equal” or substitute will be ordered, installed or utilized until City’s review
is complete, which will be evidenced by a Change Order in the case of a substitute and an
accepted Submittal for an “or-equal.” City will advise Contractor in writing of its determination.
D. Special Guarantee: City may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor’s expense a special
performance guarantee, warranty, or other surety with respect to any substitute. Contractor shall
indemnify and hold harmless City and anyone directly or indirectly employed by them from and
against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out
of the use of substituted materials or equipment.
E. City’s Cost Reimbursement: City will record City’s costs in evaluating a substitute proposed or
submitted by Contractor pursuant to Paragraphs 5.05.A.2 and 5.05.B. Whether or not City
approves a substitute so proposed or submitted by Contractor, Contractor may be required to
reimburse City for evaluating each such proposed substitute. Contractor may also be required to
reimburse City for the charges for making changes in the Contract Documents.
F. Contractor’s Expense: Contractor shall provide all data in support of any proposed substitute or
“or-equal” at Contractor’s expense.
G. Substitute Reimbursement: Costs (savings or charges) attributable to acceptance of a substitute
shall be incorporated to the Contract by Participating Change Order.
5.06 Pre-Qualification of Bidders (Prime Contractors and Subcontractors)
A. The Contractor and any subcontractors are required to be prequalified for the work types
requiring pre-qualification
5.07 Concerning Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Others
A. Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise Compliance:
00 73 10- 17
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 17 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Required for this Contract.
(Check this box if there is any City Participation)
Not Required for this Contract.
It is City policy to ensure the full and equitable participation by Minority and Women Business
Enterprises (MWBE) in the procurement of goods and services on a contractual basis. If the
Contract Documents provide for a MWBE goal, Contractor is required to comply with the intent
of the City’s MWBE Ordinance (as amended) by the following:
1. Contractor shall, upon request by City, provide complete and accurate information regarding
actual work performed by a MWBE on the Contract and payment therefor.
2. Contractor will not make additions, deletions, or substitutions of accepted MWBE without
written consent of the City. Any unjustified change or deletion shall be a material breach of
Contract and may result in debarment in accordance with the procedures outlined in the
Ordinance.
3. Contractor shall, upon request by City, allow an audit and/or examination of any books,
records, or files in the possession of the Contractor that will substantiate the actual work
performed by an MWBE. Material misrepresentation of any nature will be grounds for
termination of the Contract. Any such misrepresentation may be grounds for disqualification
of Contractor to bid on future contracts with the City for a period of not less than three years.
B. Contractor shall be fully responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the Subcontractors,
Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the Work just as
Contractor is responsible for Contractor’s own acts and omissions. Nothing in the Contract
Documents:
1. shall create for the benefit of any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity
any contractual relationship between City and any such Subcontractor, Supplier or other
individual or entity; nor
2. shall create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any moneys
due any such Subcontractor, Supplier, or other individual or entity except as may otherwise
be required by Laws and Regulations.
C. Contractor shall be solely responsible for scheduling and coordinating the Work of
Subcontractors, Suppliers, and other individuals or entities performing or furnishing any of the
Work under a direct or indirect contract with Contractor.
D. All Subcontractors, Suppliers, and such other individuals or entities performing or furnishing
any of the Work shall communicate with City through Contractor.
E. All Work performed for Contractor by a Subcontractor or Supplier will be pursuant to an
appropriate agreement between Contractor and the Subcontractor or Supplier which specifically
binds the Subcontractor or Supplier to the applicable terms and conditions of these Contract
00 73 10- 18
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 18 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents, Contractor shall provide City contract numbers and reference numbers to the
Subcontractors and/or Suppliers.
5.08 Wage Rates
Required for this Contract.
Not Required for this Contract.
A. Duty to pay Prevailing Wage Rates. The Contractor shall comply with all requirements of
Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code (as amended), including the payment of not less than the
rates determined by the City Council of the City of Fort Worth to be the prevailing wage rates in
accordance with Chapter 2258. Such prevailing wage rates are included in these Contract
Documents.
B. Penalty for Violation. A Contractor or any Subcontractor who does not pay the prevailing wage
shall, upon demand made by the City, pay to the City $60 for each worker employed for each
calendar day or part of the day that the worker is paid less than the prevailing wage rates
stipulated in these contract documents. This penalty shall be retained by the City to offset its
administrative costs, pursuant to Texas Government Code 2258.023.
C. Complaints of Violations and City Determination of Good Cause. On receipt of information,
including a complaint by a worker, concerning an alleged violation of 2258.023, Texas
Government Code, by a Contractor or Subcontractor, the City shall make an initial
determination, before the 31st day after the date the City receives the information, as to whether
good cause exists to believe that the violation occurred. The City shall notify in writing the
Contractor or Subcontractor and any affected worker of its initial determination. Upon the
City’s determination that there is good cause to believe the Contractor or Subcontractor has
violated Chapter 2258, the City shall retain the full amounts claimed by the claimant or
claimants as the difference between wages paid and wages due under the prevailing wage rates,
such amounts being subtracted from successive progress payments pending a final determination
of the violation.
D. Arbitration Required if Violation Not Resolved. An issue relating to an alleged violation of
Section 2258.023, Texas Government Code, including a penalty owed to the City or an affected
worker, shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the Texas General
Arbitration Act (Article 224 et seq., Revised Statutes) if the Contractor or Subcontractor and any
affected worker does not resolve the issue by agreement before the 15th day after the date the
City makes its initial determination pursuant to Paragraph C above. If the persons required to
arbitrate under this section do not agree on an arbitrator before the 11th day after the date that
arbitration is required, a district court shall appoint an arbitrator on the petition of any of the
persons. The City is not a party in the arbitration. The decision and award of the arbitrator is
final and binding on all parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction.
E. Records to be Maintained. The Contractor and each Subcontractor shall, for a period of three (3)
years following the date of acceptance of the work, maintain records that show (i) the name and
00 73 10- 19
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 19 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
occupation of each worker employed by the Contractor in the construction of the Work provided
for in this Contract; and (ii) the actual per diem wages paid to each worker. The records shall be
open at all reasonable hours for inspection by the City. The provisions of Paragraph 6.23, Right
to Audit, shall pertain to this inspection.
F. Progress Payments. With each progress payment or payroll period, whichever is less, the
Contractor shall submit an affidavit stating that the Contractor has complied with the
requirements of Chapter 2258, Texas Government Code.
G. Posting of Wage Rates. The Contractor shall post prevailing wage rates in a conspicuous place at
all times.
H. Subcontractor Compliance. The Contractor shall include in its subcontracts and/or shall
otherwise require all of its Subcontractors to comply with Paragraphs A through G above.
5.09 Patent Fees and Royalties
A. To the fullest extent permitted by Laws and Regulations, Contractor shall indemnify and hold
harmless City, from and against all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited
to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court
or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to any infringement of
patent rights or copyrights incident to the use in the performance of the Work or resulting from
the incorporation in the Work of any invention, design, process, product, or device not specified
in the Contract Documents.
5.10 Laws and Regulations
A. Contractor shall give all notices required by and shall comply with all Laws and Regulations
applicable to the performance of the Work. Except where otherwise expressly required by
applicable Laws and Regulations, the City shall not be responsible for monitoring Contractor’s
compliance with any Laws or Regulations.
B. If Contractor performs any Work knowing or having reason to know that it is contrary to Laws
or Regulations, Contractor shall bear all claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such Work.
However, it shall not be Contractor’s responsibility to make certain that the Specifications and
Drawings are in accordance with Laws and Regulations, but this shall not relieve Contractor of
Contractor’s obligations under Paragraph 3.01.
5.11 Use of Site and Other Areas
A. Limitation on Use of Site and Other Areas:
1. Contractor shall confine construction equipment, the storage of materials and equipment, and
the operations of workers to the Site and other areas permitted by Laws and Regulations, and
shall not unreasonably encumber the Site and other areas with construction equipment or
00 73 10- 20
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 20 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
other materials or equipment. Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any damage to
any such land or area, or to the owner or occupant thereof, or of any adjacent land or areas
resulting from the performance of the Work.
2. At any time when, in the judgment of the City, the Contractor has obstructed or closed or is
carrying on operations in a portion of a street, right-of-way, or easement greater than is
necessary for proper execution of the Work, the City may require the Contractor to finish the
section on which operations are in progress before work is commenced on any additional
area of the Site.
3. Should any Damage Claim be made by any such owner or occupant because of the
performance of the Work, Contractor shall promptly attempt to resolve the Damage Claim.
4. Pursuant to Paragraph 5.18, Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, from and
against all claims, costs, losses, and damages arising out of or relating to any claim or
action, legal or equitable, brought by any such owner or occupant against City.
B. Removal of Debris During Performance of the Work: During the progress of the Work
Contractor shall keep the Site and other areas free from accumulations of waste materials,
rubbish, and other debris. Removal and disposal of such waste materials, rubbish, and other
debris shall conform to applicable Laws and Regulations.
C. Site Maintenance Cleaning: 24 hours after written notice is given to the Contractor that the
clean-up on the job site is proceeding in a manner unsatisfactory to the City or Developer, if the
Contractor fails to correct the unsatisfactory procedure, the City may take such direct action as
the City deems appropriate to correct the clean-up deficiencies cited to the Contractor in the
written notice (by letter or electronic communication), and shall be entitled to recover its cost in
doing so. The City may withhold Final Acceptance until clean-up is complete and cost are
recovered.
D. Final Site Cleaning: Prior to Final Acceptance of the Work Contractor shall clean the Site and
the Work and make it ready for utilization by City or adjacent property owner. At the completion
of the Work Contractor shall remove from the Site all tools, appliances, construction equipment
and machinery, and surplus materials and shall restore to original condition or better all property
disturbed by the Work.
E. Loading Structures: Contractor shall not load nor permit any part of any structure to be loaded
in any manner that will endanger the structure, nor shall Contractor subject any part of the Work
or adjacent property to stresses or pressures that will endanger it.
5.12 Record Documents
A. Contractor shall maintain in a safe place at the Site or in a place designated by the Contractor
and approved by the City, one (1) record copy of all Drawings, Specifications, Addenda, Change
Orders, Field Orders, and written interpretations and clarifications in good order and annotated
to show changes made during construction. These record documents together with all approved
00 73 10- 21
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 21 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Samples and a counterpart of all accepted Submittals will be available to City for reference.
Upon completion of the Work, these record documents, any operation and maintenance manuals,
and Submittals will be delivered to City prior to Final Inspection. Contractor shall include
accurate locations for buried and imbedded items.
5.13 Safety and Protection
A. Contractor shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety
precautions and programs in connection with the Work. Such responsibility does not relieve
Subcontractors of their responsibility for the safety of persons or property in the performance of
their work, nor for compliance with applicable safety Laws and Regulations. Contractor shall
take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to
prevent damage, injury or loss to:
1. all persons on the Site or who may be affected by the Work;
2. all the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on
or off the Site; and
3. other property at the Site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, walks,
pavements, roadways, structures, utilities, and Underground Facilities not designated for
removal, relocation, or replacement in the course of construction.
B. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Laws and Regulations relating to the safety of
persons or property, or to the protection of persons or property from damage, injury, or loss; and
shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. Contractor shall
notify owners of adjacent property and of Underground Facilities and other utility owners when
prosecution of the Work may affect them, and shall cooperate with them in the protection,
removal, relocation, and replacement of their property.
C. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of City’s safety programs, if any.
D. Contractor shall inform City of the specific requirements of Contractor’s safety program, if any,
with which City’s employees and representatives must comply while at the Site.
E. All damage, injury, or loss to any property referred to in Paragraph 5.13.A.2 or 5.13.A.3 caused,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by Contractor, any Subcontractor, Supplier, or any
other individual or entity directly or indirectly employed by any of them to perform any of the
Work, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, shall be remedied by Contractor.
F. Contractor’s duties and responsibilities for safety and for protection of the Work shall continue
until such time as all the Work is completed and City has accepted the Work.
5.14 Safety Representative
Contractor shall inform City in writing of Contractor’s designated safety representative at the Site.
00 73 10- 22
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 22 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
5.15 Hazard Communication Programs
Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating any exchange of material safety data sheets or other
hazard communication information required to be made available to or exchanged between or
among employers in accordance with Laws or Regulations.
5.16 Submittals
A. Contractor shall submit required Submittals to City for review and acceptance. Each submittal
will be identified as required by City.
1. Submit number of copies specified in the General Requirements.
2. Data shown on the Submittals will be complete with respect to quantities, dimensions,
specified performance and design criteria, materials, and similar data to show City the
services, materials, and equipment Contractor proposes to provide and to enable City to
review the information for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
3. Submittals submitted as herein provided by Contractor and reviewed by City for
conformance with the design concept shall be executed in conformity with the Contract
Documents unless otherwise required by City.
4. When Submittals are submitted for the purpose of showing the installation in greater detail,
their review shall not excuse Contractor from requirements shown on the Drawings and
Specifications.
5. For-Information-Only submittals upon which the City is not expected to conduct review or
take responsive action may be so identified in the Contract Documents.
6. Submit required number of Samples specified in the Specifications.
7. Clearly identify each Sample as to material, Supplier, pertinent data such as catalog numbers,
the use for which intended and other data as City may require to enable City to review the
submittal for the limited purposes required by Paragraph 5.16.C.
B. Where a Submittal is required by the Contract Documents or the Schedule of Submittals, any
related Work performed prior to City’s review and acceptance of the pertinent submittal will be
at the sole expense and responsibility of Contractor.
C. City’s Review:
1. City will provide timely review of required Submittals in accordance with the Schedule of
Submittals acceptable to City. City’s review and acceptance will be only to determine if the
items covered by the submittals will, after installation or incorporation in the Work, conform
to the information given in the Contract Documents and be compatible with the design
concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Contract
Documents.
00 73 10- 23
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 23 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
2. City’s review and acceptance will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or
procedures of construction (except where a particular means, method, technique, sequence,
or procedure of construction is specifically and expressly called for by the Contract
Documents) or to safety precautions or programs incident thereto. The review and
acceptance of a separate item as such will not indicate approval of the assembly in which the
item functions.
3. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for any
variation from the requirements of the Contract Documents unless Contractor has complied
with the requirements of Section 01 33 00 and City has given written acceptance of each
such variation by specific written notation thereof incorporated in or accompanying the
Submittal. City’s review and acceptance shall not relieve Contractor from responsibility for
complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
5.17 Contractor’s General Warranty and Guarantee
A. Contractor warrants and guarantees to City that all Work will be in accordance with the Contract
Documents and will not be defective. City and its officers, directors, members, partners,
employees, agents, consultants, and subcontractors shall be entitled to rely on representation of
Contractor’s warranty and guarantee.
B. Contractor’s warranty and guarantee hereunder excludes defects or damage caused by:
1. abuse, modification, or improper maintenance or operation by persons other than Contractor,
Subcontractors, Suppliers, or any other individual or entity for whom Contractor is
responsible; or
2. normal wear and tear under normal usage.
C. Contractor’s obligation to perform and complete the Work in accordance with the Contract
Documents shall be absolute. None of the following will constitute an acceptance of Work that is
not in accordance with the Contract Documents or a release of Contractor’s obligation to
perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents:
1. observations by City;
2. recommendation or payment by City or Developer of any progress or final payment;
3. the issuance of a certificate of Final Acceptance by City or any payment related thereto by
City;
4. use or occupancy of the Work or any part thereof by City;
5. any review and acceptance of a Submittal by City;
6. any inspection, test, or approval by others; or
00 73 10- 24
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 24 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7. any correction of defective Work by City.
D. The Contractor shall remedy any defects or damages in the Work and pay for any damage to
other work or property resulting therefrom which shall appear within a period of two (2) years
from the date of Final Acceptance of the Work unless a longer period is specified and shall
furnish a good and sufficient maintenance bond, complying with the requirements of Article
4.02.B. The City will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness.
5.18 Indemnification
A. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend, at its own expense, the
City, its officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims arising out of, or
alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be performed by the Contractor, its officers,
agents, employees, subcontractors, licenses or invitees under this Contract. THIS
INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO OPERATE
AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME
OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY
ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY. This indemnity provision is
intended to include, without limitation, indemnity for costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by
the City in defending against such claims and causes of actions.
B. Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, at its own expense, the City, its
officers, servants and employees, from and against any and all loss, damage or destruction of
property of the City, arising out of, or alleged to arise out of, the work and services to be
performed by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees or invitees
under this Contract. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS SPECIFICALLY
INTENDED TO OPERATE AND BE EFFECTIVE EVEN IF IT IS ALLEGED OR
PROVEN THAT ALL OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES BEING SOUGHT WERE
CAUSED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, BY ANY ACT, OMISSION OR NEGLIGENCE OF
THE CITY.
5.19 Delegation of Professional Design Services
A. Contractor will not be required to provide professional design services unless such services are
specifically required by the Contract Documents for a portion of the Work or unless such
services are required to carry out Contractor’s responsibilities for construction means, methods,
techniques, sequences and procedures.
B. If professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems,
materials or equipment are specifically required of Contractor by the Contract Documents, City
will specify all performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. Contractor shall
cause such services or certifications to be provided by a properly licensed professional, whose
signature and seal shall appear on all drawings, calculations, specifications, certifications, and
Submittals prepared by such professional. Submittals related to the Work designed or certified
by such professional, if prepared by others, shall bear such professional’s written approval when
submitted to City.
00 73 10- 25
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 25 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
C. City shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy, accuracy and completeness of the services,
certifications or approvals performed by such design professionals, provided City has specified
to Contractor performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy.
D. Pursuant to this Paragraph 5.19, City’s review and acceptance of design calculations and design
drawings will be only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with performance
and design criteria given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. City’s
review and acceptance of Submittals (except design calculations and design drawings) will be
only for the purpose stated in Paragraph 5.16.C.
5.20 Right to Audit:
A. The City reserves the right to audit all projects utilizing City funds
B. The Contractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions relating
to this Contract. Contractor agrees that the City shall have access during Regular Working Hours
to all necessary Contractor facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space
in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall
give Contractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
C. Contractor further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder a provision to the effect that
the subcontractor agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final
payment under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of such Subcontractor, involving transactions to
the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during Regular Working Hours to all
Subcontractor facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to
conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this Paragraph. The City shall give
Subcontractor reasonable advance notice of intended audits.
D. Contractor and Subcontractor agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the
City. The City agrees to reimburse Contractor for the cost of the copies as follows at the rate
published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed.
5.21 Nondiscrimination
A. The City is responsible for operating Public Transportation Programs and implementing transit-
related projects, which are funded in part with Federal financial assistance awarded by the U.S.
Department of Transportation and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), without
discriminating against any person in the United States on the basis of race, color, or national
origin.
B. Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended: Contractor shall comply with the requirements of
the Act and the Regulations as further defined in the Supplementary Conditions for any project
receiving Federal assistance.
00 73 10- 26
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 26 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 6 – OTHER WORK AT THE SITE
6.01 Related Work at Site
A. City may perform other work related to the Project at the Site with City’s employees, or other
City contractors, or through other direct contracts therefor, or have other work performed by
utility owners. If such other work is not noted in the Contract Documents, then written notice
thereof will be given to Contractor prior to starting any such other work; and
B. Contractor shall afford each other contractor who is a party to such a direct contract, each utility
owner, and City, if City is performing other work with City’s employees or other City
contractors, proper and safe access to the Site, provide a reasonable opportunity for the
introduction and storage of materials and equipment and the execution of such other work, and
properly coordinate the Work with theirs. Contractor shall do all cutting, fitting, and patching of
the Work that may be required to properly connect or otherwise make its several parts come
together and properly integrate with such other work. Contractor shall not endanger any work of
others by cutting, excavating, or otherwise altering such work; provided, however, that
Contractor may cut or alter others' work with the written consent of City and the others whose
work will be affected.
C. If the proper execution or results of any part of Contractor’s Work depends upon work
performed by others under this Article 7, Contractor shall inspect such other work and promptly
report to City in writing any delays, defects, or deficiencies in such other work that render it
unavailable or unsuitable for the proper execution and results of Contractor’s Work. Contractor’s
failure to so report will constitute an acceptance of such other work as fit and proper for
integration with Contractor’s Work except for latent defects in the work provided by others.
ARTICLE 7 – CITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES
7.01 Inspections, Tests, and Approvals
City’s responsibility with respect to certain inspections, tests, and approvals is set forth in Paragraph
11.03.
7.02 Limitations on City’s Responsibilities
A. The City shall not supervise, direct, or have control or authority over, nor be responsible for,
Contractor’s means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety
precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure of Contractor to comply with Laws
and Regulations applicable to the performance of the Work. City will not be responsible for
Contractor’s failure to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
B. City will notify the Contractor of applicable safety plans pursuant to Paragraph 5.13.
00 73 10- 27
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 27 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
7.03 Compliance with Safety Program
While at the Site, City’s employees and representatives shall comply with the specific applicable
requirements of Contractor’s safety programs of which City has been informed pursuant to
Paragraph 5.13.
ARTICLE 8 – CITY’S OBSERVATION STATUS DURING CONSTRUCTION
8.01 City’s Project Representative
City will provide one or more Project Representative(s) during the construction period. The duties
and responsibilities and the limitations of authority of City’s representative during construction are
set forth in the Contract Documents.
A. City’s Project Representative will make visits to the Site at intervals appropriate to the various
stages of construction as City deems necessary in order to observe the progress that has been
made and the quality of the various aspects of Contractor’s executed Work. Based on
information obtained during such visits and observations, City’s Project Representative will
determine, in general, if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents.
City’s Project Representative will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous inspections
on the Site to check the quality or quantity of the Work. City’s Project Representative’s efforts
will be directed toward providing City a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work
will conform generally to the Contract Documents.
B. City’s Project Representative’s visits and observations are subject to all the limitations on
authority and responsibility in the Contract Documents.
8.02 Authorized Variations in Work
City’s Project Representative may authorize minor variations in the Work from the requirements of
the Contract Documents which do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the Contract
Time and are compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a Field Order and will be
binding on City Developer, and also on Contractor, who shall perform the Work involved promptly.
8.03 Rejecting Defective Work
City will have authority to reject Work which City’s Project Representative believes to be defective,
or will not produce a completed Project that conforms to the Contract Documents or that will
prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole as
indicated by the Contract Documents. City will have authority to conduct special inspection or
testing of the Work as provided in Article 11, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or
completed.
00 73 10- 28
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 28 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
8.04 Determinations for Work Performed
Contractor will determine the actual quantities and classifications of Work performed. City’s Project
Representative will review with Contractor the preliminary determinations on such matters before
rendering a written recommendation. City’s written decision will be final (except as modified to
reflect changed factual conditions or more accurate data).
ARTICLE 9 – CHANGES IN THE WORK
9.01 Authorized Changes in the Work
A. Without invalidating the Contract and without notice to any surety, City may, at any time or
from time to time, order Extra Work. Upon notice of such Extra Work, Contractor shall
promptly proceed with the Work involved which will be performed under the applicable
conditions of the Contract Documents (except as otherwise specifically provided). Extra Work
shall be memorialized by a Participating Change Order which may or may not precede an order
of Extra work.
B. For minor changes of Work not requiring changes to Contract Time or Contract Price on a
project with City participation, a Field Order may be issued by the City.
9.02 Notification to Surety
If the provisions of any bond require notice to be given to a surety of any change affecting the
general scope of the Work or the provisions of the Contract Documents (including, but not limited
to, Contract Price or Contract Time), the giving of any such notice will be Contractor’s
responsibility. The amount of each applicable bond will be adjusted by the Contractor to reflect the
effect of any such change.
ARTICLE 10 – CHANGE OF CONTRACT PRICE; CHANGE OF CONTRACT TIME
10.01 Change of Contract Price
A. The Contract Price may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.02 Change of Contract Time
A. The Contract Time may only be changed by a Participating Change Order for projects with City
participation.
10.03 Delays
A. If Contractor is delayed, City shall not be liable to Contractor for any claims, costs, losses, or
damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and
other professionals and all court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) sustained by
Contractor on or in connection with any other project or anticipated project.
00 73 10- 29
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 29 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
ARTICLE 11 – TESTS AND INSPECTIONS; CORRECTION, REMOVAL OR ACCEPTANCE OF
DEFECTIVE WORK
11.01 Notice of Defects
Notice of all defective Work of which City has actual knowledge will be given to Contractor.
Defective Work may be rejected, corrected, or accepted as provided in this Article 13.
11.02 Access to Work
City, independent testing laboratories, and governmental agencies with jurisdictional interests will
have access to the Site and the Work at reasonable times for their observation, inspection, and
testing. Contractor shall provide them proper and safe conditions for such access and advise them of
Contractor’s safety procedures and programs so that they may comply therewith as applicable.
11.03 Tests and Inspections
A. Contractor shall give City timely notice of readiness of the Work for all required inspections,
tests, or approvals and shall cooperate with inspection and testing personnel to facilitate required
inspections or tests.
B. If Contract Documents, Laws or Regulations of any public body having jurisdiction require any
of the Work (or part thereof) to be inspected, tested, or approved, Contractor shall assume full
responsibility for arranging and obtaining such independent inspections, tests, retests or
approvals, pay all costs in connection therewith, and furnish City the required certificates of
inspection or approval; excepting, however, those fees specifically identified in the
Supplementary Conditions or any Texas Department of Licensure and Regulation (TDLR)
inspections, which shall be paid as described in the Supplementary Conditions.
C. Contractor shall be responsible for arranging and obtaining and shall pay all costs in connection
with any inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals required for City’s acceptance of materials or
equipment to be incorporated in the Work; or acceptance of materials, mix designs, or equipment
submitted for approval prior to Contractor’s purchase thereof for incorporation in the Work.
Such inspections, tests, re-tests, or approvals shall be performed by organizations approved by
City.
D. City may arrange for the services of an independent testing laboratory (“Testing Lab”) to
perform any inspections or tests (“Testing”) for any part of the Work, as determined solely by
City.
1. City will coordinate such Testing to the extent possible, with Contractor;
2. Should any Testing under this Section 11.03 D result in a “fail”, “did not pass” or other
similar negative result, the Contractor shall be responsible for paying for any and all retests.
Contractor’s cancellation without cause of City initiated Testing shall be deemed a negative
result and require a retest.
00 73 10- 30
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 30 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
3. Any amounts owed for any retest under this Section 11.03 D shall be paid directly to the
Testing Lab by Contractor. City will forward all invoices for retests to
Developer/Contractor.
4. If Contractor fails to pay the Testing Lab, City will not issue a letter of Final Acceptance
until the Testing Lab is Paid
E. If any Work (or the work of others) that is to be inspected, tested, or approved is covered by
Contractor without written concurrence of City, Contractor shall, if requested by City, uncover
such Work for observation.
11.04 Uncovering Work
A. If any Work is covered contrary to the Contract Documents or specific instructions by the City, it
must, if requested by City, be uncovered for City’s observation and replaced at Contractor’s
expense.
11.05 City May Stop the Work
If the Work is defective, or Contractor fails to supply sufficient skilled workers or suitable materials
or equipment, or fails to perform the Work in such a way that the completed Work will conform to
the Contract Documents, City may order Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until
the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, this right of City to stop the Work shall not
give rise to any duty on the part of City to exercise this right for the benefit of Contractor, any
Subcontractor, any Supplier, any other individual or entity, or any surety for, or employee or agent
of any of them.
11.06 Correction or Removal of Defective Work
A. Promptly after receipt of written notice, Contractor shall correct all defective Work pursuant to
an acceptable schedule, whether or not fabricated, installed, or completed, or, if the Work has
been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it with Work that is not defective.
Contractor shall pay all claims, costs, additional testing, losses, and damages (including but not
limited to all fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all
court or arbitration or other dispute resolution costs) arising out of or relating to such correction
or removal (including but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others).
Failure to require the removal of any defective Work shall not constitute acceptance of such
Work.
B. When correcting defective Work under the terms of this Paragraph 11.06 or Paragraph 11.07,
Contractor shall take no action that would void or otherwise impair City’s special warranty and
guarantee, if any, on said Work.
11.07 Correction Period
A. If within two (2) years after the date of Final Acceptance (or such longer period of time as may
be prescribed by the terms of any applicable special guarantee required by the Contract
00 73 10- 31
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 31 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
Documents), any Work is found to be defective, or if the repair of any damages to the land or
areas made available for Contractor’s use by City or permitted by Laws and Regulations as
contemplated in Paragraph 5.10.A is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without
cost to City and in accordance with City’s written instructions:
1. repair such defective land or areas; or
2. correct such defective Work; or
3. if the defective Work has been rejected by City, remove it from the Project and replace it
with Work that is not defective, and
4. satisfactorily correct or repair or remove and replace any damage to other Work, to the work
of others or other land or areas resulting therefrom.
B. If Contractor does not promptly comply with the terms of City’s written instructions, or in an
emergency where delay would cause serious risk of loss or damage, City may have the defective
Work corrected or repaired or may have the rejected Work removed and replaced. All claims,
costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of engineers,
architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution costs)
arising out of or relating to such correction or repair or such removal and replacement (including
but not limited to all costs of repair or replacement of work of others) will be paid by Contractor.
C. Where defective Work (and damage to other Work resulting therefrom) has been corrected or
removed and replaced under this Paragraph 11.07, the correction period hereunder with respect
to such Work may be required to be extended for an additional period of one year after the end
of the initial correction period. City shall provide 30 days written notice to Contractor and
Developer should such additional warranty coverage be required. Contractor’s obligations under
this Paragraph 11.07 are in addition to any other obligation or warranty. The provisions of this
Paragraph 11.07 shall not be construed as a substitute for, or a waiver of, the provisions of any
applicable statute of limitation or repose.
11.08 City May Correct Defective Work
A. If Contractor fails within a reasonable time after written notice from City to correct defective
Work, or to remove and replace rejected Work as required by City in accordance with Paragraph
11.06.A, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents,
or if Contractor fails to comply with any other provision of the Contract Documents, City may,
after seven (7) days written notice to Contractor and the Developer, correct, or remedy any such
deficiency.
B. In exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph 11.09, City shall proceed
expeditiously. In connection with such corrective or remedial action, City may exclude
Contractor from all or part of the Site, take possession of all or part of the Work and suspend
Contractor’s services related thereto, and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment
incorporated in the Work, stored at the Site or for which City has paid Contractor but which are
00 73 10- 32
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 32 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow City, City’s representatives, agents, consultants,
employees, and City’s other contractors, access to the Site to enable City to exercise the rights
and remedies under this Paragraph.
C. All claims, costs, losses, and damages (including but not limited to all fees and charges of
engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals and all court or other dispute resolution
costs) incurred or sustained by City in exercising the rights and remedies under this Paragraph
13.09 will be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order will be issued incorporating the
necessary revisions in the Contract Documents with respect to the Work; and City shall be
entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Price.
D. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Time because of any delay in the
performance of the Work attributable to the exercise of City’s rights and remedies under this
Paragraph 11.09.
ARTICLE 12 – COMPLETION
12.01 Contractor’s Warranty of Title
Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all Work, materials, and equipment covered by any
Application for Payment will pass to City no later than the time of Final Acceptance and shall be
free and clear of all Liens.
12.02 Partial Utilization
A. Prior to Final Acceptance of all the Work, City may use or occupy any substantially completed
part of the Work which has specifically been identified in the Contract Documents, or which
City, determines constitutes a separately functioning and usable part of the Work that can be
used by City for its intended purpose without significant interference with Contractor’s
performance of the remainder of the Work. City at any time may notify Contractor in writing to
permit City to use or occupy any such part of the Work which City determines to be ready for its
intended use, subject to the following conditions:
1. Contractor at any time may notify City in writing that Contractor considers any such part of
the Work ready for its intended use.
2. Within a reasonable time after notification as enumerated in Paragraph 14.05.A.1, City and
Contractor shall make an inspection of that part of the Work to determine its status of
completion. If City does not consider that part of the Work to be substantially complete, City
will notify Contractor in writing giving the reasons therefor.
3. Partial Utilization will not constitute Final Acceptance by City.
12.03 Final Inspection
A. Upon written notice from Contractor that the entire Work is complete in accordance with the
Contract Documents:
00 73 10- 33
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 33 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
1. within 10 days, City will schedule a Final Inspection with Contractor.
2. City will notify Contractor in writing of all particulars in which this inspection reveals that
the Work is incomplete or defective. Contractor shall immediately take such measures as are
necessary to complete such Work or remedy such deficiencies.
12.04 Final Acceptance
A. Upon completion by Contractor to City’s satisfaction, of any additional Work identified in the
Final Inspection, City will issue to Contractor a letter of Final Acceptance upon the satisfaction
of the following:
1. All documentation called for in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the
evidence of insurance required by Paragraph 5.03;
2. consent of the surety, if any, to Final Acceptance;
3. a list of all pending or released Damage Claims against City that Contractor believes are
unsettled; and
4. affidavits of payments and complete and legally effective releases or waivers (satisfactory to
City) of all Lien rights arising out of or Liens filed in connection with the Work.
5. after all Damage Claims have been resolved:
a. directly by the Contractor or;
b. Contractor provides evidence that the Damage Claim has been reported to Contractor’s
insurance provider for resolution.
6. Issuing Final Acceptance by the City shall not relieve the Contractor of any guarantees or
other requirements of the Contract Documents which specifically continue thereafter.
ARTICLE 13 – SUSPENSION OF WORK
13.01 City May Suspend Work
A. At any time and without cause, City may suspend the Work or any portion thereof by written
notice to Contractor and which may fix the date on which Work will be resumed. Contractor
shall resume the Work on the date so fixed. During temporary suspension of the Work covered
by these Contract Documents, for any reason, the City will stop contract time on City
participation projects.
B. Should the Contractor not be able to complete a portion of the Project due to causes beyond the
control of and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, and should it be determined by
mutual consent of the Contractor and City that a solution to allow construction to proceed is not
00 73 10- 34
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 34 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
available within a reasonable period of time, Contractor may request an extension in Contract
Time, directly attributable to any such suspension.
C. If it should become necessary to suspend the Work for an indefinite period, the Contractor shall
store all materials in such a manner that they will not obstruct or impede the public unnecessarily
nor become damaged in any way, and he shall take every precaution to prevent damage or
deterioration of the work performed; he shall provide suitable drainage about the work, and erect
temporary structures where necessary.
ARTICLE 14 – MISCELLANEOUS
14.01 Giving Notice
A. Whenever any provision of the Contract Documents requires the giving of written notice, it will
be deemed to have been validly given if:
1. delivered in person to the individual or to a member of the firm or to an officer of the
corporation for whom it is intended; or
2. delivered at or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the last business
address known to the giver of the notice.
B. Business address changes must be promptly made in writing to the other party.
C. Whenever the Contract Documents specifies giving notice by electronic means such electronic
notice shall be deemed sufficient upon confirmation of receipt by the receiving party.
14.02 Computation of Times
When any period of time is referred to in the Contract Documents by days, it will be computed to
exclude the first and include the last day of such period. If the last day of any such period falls on a
Saturday or Sunday or on a day made a legal holiday the next Working Day shall become the last
day of the period.
14.03 Cumulative Remedies
The duties and obligations imposed by these General Conditions and the rights and remedies
available hereunder to the parties hereto are in addition to, and are not to be construed in any way as
a limitation of, any rights and remedies available to any or all of them which are otherwise imposed
or available by Laws or Regulations, by special warranty or guarantee, or by other provisions of the
Contract Documents. The provisions of this Paragraph will be as effective as if repeated specifically
in the Contract Documents in connection with each particular duty, obligation, right, and remedy to
which they apply.
00 73 10- 35
Standard City Conditions Of The Construction Contract For Developer Awarded Projects
Page 35 of 35
CITY OF FORT WORTH
STANDARD CITY CONDITIONS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS
Revised: January 10, 2013
14.04 Survival of Obligations
All representations, indemnifications, warranties, and guarantees made in, required by, or given in
accordance with the Contract Documents, as well as all continuing obligations indicated in the
Contract Documents, will survive final payment, completion, and acceptance of the Work or
termination or completion of the Contract or termination of the services of Contractor.
14.05 Headings
Article and paragraph headings are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute parts of these
General Conditions.
DIVISION 01
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
01 11 00 - 1
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects City Project #102509
Revised December 20, 2012
SECTION 01 11 00
SUMMARY OF WORK
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Summary of Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 - Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 - General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Work Covered by Contract Documents
1. Work is to include furnishing all labor, materials, and equipment, and performing
all Work necessary for this construction project as detailed in the Drawings and
Specifications.
B. Subsidiary Work
1. Any and all Work specifically governed by documentary requirements for the
project, such as conditions imposed by the Drawings or Contract Documents in
which no specific item for bid has been provided for in the Proposal and the item is
not a typical unit bid item included on the standard bid item list, then the item shall
be considered as a subsidiary item of Work, the cost of which shall be included in
the price bid in the Proposal for various bid items.
C. Use of Premises
1. Coordinate uses of premises under direction of the City.
2. Assume full responsibility for protection and safekeeping of materials and
equipment stored on the Site.
3. Use and occupy only portions of the public streets and alleys, or other public places
or other rights-of-way as provided for in the ordinances of the City, as shown in the
Contract Documents, or as may be specifically authorized in writing by the City.
a. A reasonable amount of tools, materials, and equipment for construction
purposes may be stored in such space, but no more than is necessary to avoid
delay in the construction operations.
01 11 00 - 2
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects City Project #102509
Revised December 20, 2012
b. Excavated and waste materials shall be stored in such a way as not to interfere
with the use of spaces that may be designated to be left free and unobstructed
and so as not to inconvenience occupants of adjacent property.
c. If the street is occupied by railroad tracks, the Work shall be carried on in such
manner as not to interfere with the operation of the railroad.
1) All Work shall be in accordance with railroad requirements set forth in
Division 0 as well as the railroad permit.
D. Work within Easements
1. Do not enter upon private property for any purpose without having previously
obtained permission from the owner of such property.
2. Do not store equipment or material on private property unless and until the
specified approval of the property owner has been secured in writing by the
Contractor and a copy furnished to the City.
3. Unless specifically provided otherwise, clear all rights-of-way or easements of
obstructions which must be removed to make possible proper prosecution of the
Work as a part of the project construction operations.
4. Preserve and use every precaution to prevent damage to, all trees, shrubbery, plants,
lawns, fences, culverts, curbing, and all other types of structures or improvements,
to all water, sewer, and gas lines, to all conduits, overhead pole lines, or
appurtenances thereof, including the construction of temporary fences and to all
other public or private property adjacent to the Work.
5. Notify the proper representatives of the owners or occupants of the public or private
lands of interest in lands which might be affected by the Work.
a. Such notice shall be made at least 48 hours in advance of the beginning of the
Work.
b. Notices shall be applicable to both public and private utility companies and any
corporation, company, individual, or other, either as owners or occupants,
whose land or interest in land might be affected by the Work.
c. Be responsible for all damage or injury to property of any character resulting
from any act, omission, neglect, or misconduct in the manner or method or
execution of the Work, or at any time due to defective work, material, or
equipment.
6. Fence
a. Restore all fences encountered and removed during construction of the Project
to the original or a better than original condition.
b. Erect temporary fencing in place of the fencing removed whenever the Work is
not in progress and when the site is vacated overnight, and/or at all times to
provide site security.
c. The cost for all fence work within easements, including removal, temporary
closures and replacement, shall be subsidiary to the various items bid in the
project proposal, unless a bid item is specifically provided in the proposal.
01 11 00 - 3
DAP SUMMARY OF WORK
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – Developer Awarded Projects City Project #102509
Revised December 20, 2012
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 25 00 - 1
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 25 00
SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. The procedure for requesting the approval of substitution of a product that is not
equivalent to a product which is specified by descriptive or performance criteria or
defined by reference to 1 or more of the following:
a. Name of manufacturer
b. Name of vendor
c. Trade name
d. Catalog number
2. Substitutions are not "or-equals".
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid. No
separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Request for Substitution - General
1. Within 30 days after award of Contract (unless noted otherwise), the City will
consider formal requests from Contractor for substitution of products in place of
those specified.
2. Certain types of equipment and kinds of material are described in Specifications by
means of references to names of manufacturers and vendors, trade names, or catalog
numbers.
a. When this method of specifying is used, it is not intended to exclude from
consideration other products bearing other manufacturer's or vendor's names,
trade names, or catalog numbers, provided said products are "or-equals," as
determined by City.
3. Other types of equipment and kinds of material may be acceptable substitutions
under the following conditions:
a. Or-equals are unavailable due to strike, discontinued production of products
meeting specified requirements, or other factors beyond control of Contractor;
or,
01 25 00 - 2
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
b. Contractor proposes a cost and/or time reduction incentive to the City.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. See Request for Substitution Form (attached)
B. Procedure for Requesting Substitution
1. Substitution shall be considered only:
a. After award of Contract
b. Under the conditions stated herein
2. Submit 3 copies of each written request for substitution, including:
a. Documentation
1) Complete data substantiating compliance of proposed substitution with
Contract Documents
2) Data relating to changes in construction schedule, when a reduction is
proposed
3) Data relating to changes in cost
b. For products
1) Product identification
a) Manufacturer's name
b) Telephone number and representative contact name
c) Specification Section or Drawing reference of originally specified
product, including discrete name or tag number assigned to original
product in the Contract Documents
2) Manufacturer's literature clearly marked to show compliance of proposed
product with Contract Documents
3) Itemized comparison of original and proposed product addressing product
characteristics including, but not necessarily limited to:
a) Size
b) Composition or materials of construction
c) Weight
d) Electrical or mechanical requirements
4) Product experience
a) Location of past projects utilizing product
b) Name and telephone number of persons associated with referenced
projects knowledgeable concerning proposed product
c) Available field data and reports associated with proposed product
5) Samples
a) Provide at request of City.
b) Samples become the property of the City.
c. For construction methods:
1) Detailed description of proposed method
2) Illustration drawings
C. Approval or Rejection
1. Written approval or rejection of substitution given by the City
2. City reserves the right to require proposed product to comply with color and pattern
of specified product if necessary to secure design intent.
3. In the event the substitution is approved, if a reduction in cost or time results, it will
be documented by Change Order.
01 25 00 - 3
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
4. Substitution will be rejected if:
a. Submittal is not through the Contractor with his stamp of approval
b. Request is not made in accordance with this Specification Section
c. In the Developer’s opinion, acceptance will require substantial revision of the
original design
d. In the City’s or Developer’s opinion, substitution will not perform adequately
the function consistent with the design intent
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. In making request for substitution or in using an approved product, the Contractor
represents that the Contractor:
1. Has investigated proposed product, and has determined that it is adequate or
superior in all respects to that specified, and that it will perform function for which it
is intended
2. Will provide same guarantee for substitute item as for product specified
3. Will coordinate installation of accepted substitution into Work, to include building
modifications if necessary, making such changes as may be required for Work to be
complete in all respects
4. Waives all claims for additional costs related to substitution which subsequently
arise
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 25 00 - 4
DAP SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
EXHIBIT A
REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION FORM:
TO:
PROJECT: DATE:
We hereby submit for your consideration the following product instead of the specified item for
the above project:
SECTION PARAGRAPH SPECIFIED ITEM
Proposed Substitution:
Reason for Substitution:
Include complete information on changes to Drawings and/or Specifications which proposed
substitution will require for its proper installation.
Fill in Blanks Below:
A. Will the undersigned contractor pay for changes to the building design, including engineering
and detailing costs caused by the requested substitution?
B. What effect does substitution have on other trades?
C. Differences between proposed substitution and specified item?
D. Differences in product cost or product delivery time?
E. Manufacturer's guarantees of the proposed and specified items are:
Equal Better (explain on attachment)
The undersigned states that the function, appearance and quality are equivalent or superior to the
specified item.
Submitted By: For Use by City
Signature Recommended Recommended
as noted
Firm Not recommended Received late
Address By
Date
Date Remarks
Telephone
For Use by City:
Approved Rejected
City Date
01 31 19 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 31 19
PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Provisions for the preconstruction meeting to be held prior to the start of Work to
clarify construction contract administration procedures
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. No construction schedule required unless requested by the City.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Coordination
1. Attend preconstruction meeting.
2. Representatives of Contractor, subcontractors and suppliers attending meetings
shall be qualified and authorized to act on behalf of the entity each represents.
3. Meeting administered by City may be tape recorded.
a. If recorded, tapes will be used to prepare minutes and retained by City for
future reference.
B. Preconstruction Meeting
1. A preconstruction meeting will be held within 14 days after the delivery of the
distribution package to the City.
a. The meeting will be scheduled and administered by the City.
2. The Project Representative will preside at the meeting, prepare the notes of the
meeting and distribute copies of same to all participants who so request by fully
completing the attendance form to be circulated at the beginning of the meeting.
3. Attendance shall include:
a. Developer and Consultant
b. Contractor's project manager
c. Contractor's superintendent
d. Any subcontractor or supplier representatives whom the Contractor may desire
to invite or the City may request
01 31 19 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
e. Other City representatives
f. Others as appropriate
4. Preliminary Agenda may include:
a. Introduction of Project Personnel
b. General Description of Project
c. Status of right-of-way, utility clearances, easements or other pertinent permits
d. Contractor’s work plan and schedule
e. Contract Time
f. Notice to Proceed
g. Construction Staking
h. Progress Payments
i. Extra Work and Change Order Procedures
j. Field Orders
k. Disposal Site Letter for Waste Material
l. Insurance Renewals
m. Payroll Certification
n. Material Certifications and Quality Control Testing
o. Public Safety and Convenience
p. Documentation of Pre-Construction Conditions
q. Weekend Work Notification
r. Legal Holidays
s. Trench Safety Plans
t. Confined Space Entry Standards
u. Coordination with the City’s representative for operations of existing water
systems
v. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
w. Coordination with other Contractors
x. Early Warning System
y. Contractor Evaluation
z. Special Conditions applicable to the project
aa. Damages Claims
bb. Submittal Procedures
cc. Substitution Procedures
dd. Correspondence Routing
ee. Record Drawings
ff. Temporary construction facilities
gg. MBE/SBE procedures
hh. Final Acceptance
ii. Final Payment
jj. Questions or Comments
01 31 19 - 3
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 32 33 - 1
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 32 33
PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Administrative and procedural requirements for:
a. Preconstruction Videos
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. Though not mandatory, it is highly recommended on infill developer projects.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Preconstruction Video
1. Produce a preconstruction video of the site/alignment, including all areas in the
vicinity of and to be affected by construction.
a. Provide digital copy of video upon request by the City.
2. Retain a copy of the preconstruction video until the end of the maintenance surety
period.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
01 32 33 - 2
DAP PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 33 00 - 1
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 33 00
DAP SUBMITTALS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. General methods and requirements of submissions applicable to the following
Work-related submittals:
a. Shop Drawings
b. Product Data (including Standard Product List submittals)
c. Samples
d. Mock Ups
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Coordination
1. Notify the City in writing, at the time of submittal, of any deviations in the
submittals from the requirements of the Contract Documents.
2. Coordination of Submittal Times
a. Prepare, prioritize and transmit each submittal sufficiently in advance of
performing the related Work or other applicable activities, or within the time
specified in the individual Work Sections, of the Specifications.
b. Contractor is responsible such that the installation will not be delayed by
processing times including, but not limited to:
a) Disapproval and resubmittal (if required)
b) Coordination with other submittals
c) Testing
d) Purchasing
e) Fabrication
f) Delivery
g) Similar sequenced activities
c. No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to
transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the Work.
01 33 00 - 2
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
d. Make submittals promptly in accordance with approved schedule, and in such
sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the work of any other
contractor.
B. Submittal Numbering
1. When submitting shop drawings or samples, utilize a 9-character submittal cross-
reference identification numbering system in the following manner:
a. Use the first 6 digits of the applicable Specification Section Number.
b. For the next 2 digits number use numbers 01-99 to sequentially number each
initial separate item or drawing submitted under each specific Section number.
c. Last use a letter, A-Z, indicating the resubmission of the same drawing (i.e.
A=2nd submission, B=3rd submission, C=4th submission, etc.). A typical
submittal number would be as follows:
03 30 00-08-B
1) 03 30 00 is the Specification Section for Concrete
2) 08 is the eighth initial submittal under this Specification Section
3) B is the third submission (second resubmission) of that particular shop
drawing
C. Contractor Certification
1. Review shop drawings, product data and samples, including those by
subcontractors, prior to submission to determine and verify the following:
a. Field measurements
b. Field construction criteria
c. Catalog numbers and similar data
d. Conformance with the Contract Documents
2. Provide each shop drawing, sample and product data submitted by the Contractor
with a Certification Statement affixed including:
a. The Contractor's Company name
b. Signature of submittal reviewer
c. Certification Statement
1) “By this submittal, I hereby represent that I have determined and verified
field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions,
catalog numbers and similar data and I have checked and coordinated each
item with other applicable approved shop drawings."
D. Submittal Format
1. Fold shop drawings larger than 8 ½ inches x 11 inches to 8 ½ inches x 11inches.
2. Bind shop drawings and product data sheets together.
3. Order
a. Cover Sheet
1) Description of Packet
2) Contractor Certification
b. List of items / Table of Contents
c. Product Data /Shop Drawings/Samples /Calculations
E. Submittal Content
1. The date of submission and the dates of any previous submissions
01 33 00 - 3
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
2. The Project title and number
3. Contractor identification
4. The names of:
a. Contractor
b. Supplier
c. Manufacturer
5. Identification of the product, with the Specification Section number, page and
paragraph(s)
6. Field dimensions, clearly identified as such
7. Relation to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials
8. Applicable standards, such as ASTM or Federal Specification numbers
9. Identification by highlighting of deviations from Contract Documents
10. Identification by highlighting of revisions on resubmittals
11. An 8-inch x 3-inch blank space for Contractor and City stamps
F. Shop Drawings
1. As specified in individual Work Sections includes, but is not necessarily limited to:
a. Custom-prepared data such as fabrication and erection/installation (working)
drawings
b. Scheduled information
c. Setting diagrams
d. Actual shopwork manufacturing instructions
e. Custom templates
f. Special wiring diagrams
g. Coordination drawings
h. Individual system or equipment inspection and test reports including:
1) Performance curves and certifications
i. As applicable to the Work
2. Details
a. Relation of the various parts to the main members and lines of the structure
b. Where correct fabrication of the Work depends upon field measurements
1) Provide such measurements and note on the drawings prior to submitting
for approval.
G. Product Data
1. For submittals of product data for products included on the City’s Standard Product
List, clearly identify each item selected for use on the Project.
2. For submittals of product data for products not included on the City’s Standard
Product List, submittal data may include, but is not necessarily limited to:
a. Standard prepared data for manufactured products (sometimes referred to as
catalog data)
1) Such as the manufacturer's product specification and installation
instructions
2) Availability of colors and patterns
3) Manufacturer's printed statements of compliances and applicability
4) Roughing-in diagrams and templates
5) Catalog cuts
6) Product photographs
01 33 00 - 4
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
7) Standard wiring diagrams
8) Printed performance curves and operational-range diagrams
9) Production or quality control inspection and test reports and certifications
10) Mill reports
11) Product operating and maintenance instructions and recommended
spare-parts listing and printed product warranties
12) As applicable to the Work
H. Samples
1. As specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to:
a. Physical examples of the Work such as:
1) Sections of manufactured or fabricated Work
2) Small cuts or containers of materials
3) Complete units of repetitively used products color/texture/pattern swatches
and range sets
4) Specimens for coordination of visual effect
5) Graphic symbols and units of Work to be used by the City for independent
inspection and testing, as applicable to the Work
I. Do not start Work requiring a shop drawing, sample or product data nor any material to
be fabricated or installed prior to the approval or qualified approval of such item.
1. Fabrication performed, materials purchased or on-site construction accomplished
which does not conform to approved shop drawings and data is at the Contractor's
risk.
2. The City will not be liable for any expense or delay due to corrections or remedies
required to accomplish conformity.
3. Complete project Work, materials, fabrication, and installations in conformance
with approved shop drawings, applicable samples, and product data.
J. Submittal Distribution
1. Electronic Distribution
a. Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be
uploaded to City’s Buzzsaw site, or another external FTP site approved by the
City.
b. Shop Drawings
1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
2) Hard Copies
a) 3 copies for all submittals
b) If Contractor requires more than 1 hard copy of Shop Drawings
returned, Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed
above.
c. Product Data
1) Upload submittal to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
2) Hard Copies
a) 3 copies for all submittals
d. Samples
1) Distributed to the Project Representative
2. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)
01 33 00 - 5
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
a. Shop Drawings
1) Distributed to the City
2) Copies
a) 8 copies for mechanical submittals
b) 7 copies for all other submittals
c) If Contractor requires more than 3 copies of Shop Drawings returned,
Contractor shall submit more than the number of copies listed above.
b. Product Data
1) Distributed to the City
2) Copies
a) 4 copies
c. Samples
1) Distributed to the Project Representative
2) Copies
a) Submit the number stated in the respective Specification Sections.
3. Distribute reproductions of approved shop drawings and copies of approved
product data and samples, where required, to the job site file and elsewhere as
directed by the City.
a. Provide number of copies as directed by the City but not exceeding the number
previously specified.
K. Submittal Review
1. The review of shop drawings, data and samples will be for general conformance
with the design concept and Contract Documents. This is not to be construed as:
a. Permitting any departure from the Contract requirements
b. Relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including details,
dimensions, and materials
c. Approving departures from details furnished by the City, except as otherwise
provided herein
2. The review and approval of shop drawings, samples or product data by the City
does not relieve the Contractor from his/her responsibility with regard to the
fulfillment of the terms of the Contract.
a. All risks of error and omission are assumed by the Contractor, and the City will
have no responsibility therefore.
3. The Contractor remains responsible for details and accuracy, for coordinating the
Work with all other associated work and trades, for selecting fabrication processes,
for techniques of assembly and for performing Work in a safe manner.
4. If the shop drawings, data or samples as submitted describe variations and show a
departure from the Contract requirements which City finds to be in the interest of
the City and to be so minor as not to involve a change in Contract Price or time for
performance, the City may return the reviewed drawings without noting an
exception.
5. Submittals will be returned to the Contractor under 1 of the following codes:
a. Code 1
1) "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" is assigned when there are no notations or
comments on the submittal.
a) When returned under this code the Contractor may release the
equipment and/or material for manufacture.
b. Code 2
01 33 00 - 6
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED". This code is assigned when a confirmation of
the notations and comments IS NOT required by the Contractor.
a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the
final product.
c. Code 3
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED/RESUBMIT". This combination of codes is
assigned when notations and comments are extensive enough to require a
resubmittal of the package.
a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture;
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the
final product.
b) This resubmittal is to address all comments, omissions and
non-conforming items that were noted.
c) Resubmittal is to be received by the City within 15 Calendar Days of
the date of the City's transmittal requiring the resubmittal.
d. Code 4
1) "NOT APPROVED" is assigned when the submittal does not meet the
intent of the Contract Documents.
a) The Contractor must resubmit the entire package revised to bring the
submittal into conformance.
b) It may be necessary to resubmit using a different manufacturer/vendor
to meet the Contract Documents.
6. Resubmittals
a. Handled in the same manner as first submittals
1) Corrections other than requested by the City
2) Marked with revision triangle or other similar method
a) At Contractor’s risk if not marked
b. Submittals for each item will be reviewed no more than twice at the City’s
expense.
1) All subsequent reviews will be performed at times convenient to the City
and at the Contractor's expense, based on the City's or City
Representative’s then prevailing rates.
2) Provide Contractor reimbursement to the City within 30 Calendar Days for
all such fees invoiced by the City.
c. The need for more than 1 resubmission or any other delay in obtaining City's
review of submittals, will not entitle the Contractor to an extension of Contract
Time.
7. Partial Submittals
a. City reserves the right to not review submittals deemed partial, at the City’s
discretion.
b. Submittals deemed by the City to be not complete will be returned to the
Contractor, and will be considered "Not Approved" until resubmitted.
c. The City may at its option provide a list or mark the submittal directing the
Contractor to the areas that are incomplete.
8. If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the shop drawings to
constitute a change to the Contract Documents, then written notice must be
provided thereof to the Developer at least 7 Calendar Days prior to release for
manufacture.
01 33 00 - 7
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
9. When the shop drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the
Contractor may carry out the construction in accordance therewith and no further
changes therein except upon written instructions from the City.
10. Each submittal, appropriately coded, will be returned within 30 Calendar Days
following receipt of submittal by the City.
L. Mock ups
1. Mock Up units as specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily
limited to, complete units of the standard of acceptance for that type of Work to be
used on the Project. Remove at the completion of the Work or when directed.
M. Qualifications
1. If specifically required in other Sections of these Specifications, submit a P.E.
Certification for each item required.
N. Request for Information (RFI)
1. Contractor Request for additional information
a. Clarification or interpretation of the contract documents
b. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between Contract Documents
c. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between the Drawings and
Specifications
1) Identify the conflict and request clarification
2. Sufficient information shall be attached to permit a written response without further
information.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
01 33 00 - 8
DAP SUBMITTALS
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
12/20/2012 D. Johnson 1.4.K.8. Working Days modified to Calendar Days
01 35 13 - 1
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 1 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August, 30, 2013
SECTION 01 35 13
SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. The procedures for special project circumstances that includes, but is not limited to:
a. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation
b. Work near High Voltage Lines
c. Confined Space Entry Program
d. Air Pollution Watch Days
e. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc.
f. Water Department Notification
g. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction
h. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers
i. Coordination within Railroad permits areas
j. Dust Control
k. Employee Parking
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 33 12 25 – Connection to Existing Water Mains
1.2 REFERENCES
A. Reference Standards
1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference
standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
Specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
2. Health and Safety Code, Title 9. Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752.
High Voltage Overhead Lines.
3. North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) – Clean Construction
Specification
1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation
1. When work in the right-of-way which is under the jurisdiction of the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT):
a. Notify the Texas Department of Transportation prior to commencing any work
therein in accordance with the provisions of the permit
01 35 13 - 2
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August, 30, 2013
b. All work performed in the TxDOT right-of-way shall be performed in
compliance with and subject to approval from the Texas Department of
Transportation
B. Work near High Voltage Lines
1. Regulatory Requirements
a. All Work near High Voltage Lines (more than 600 volts measured between
conductors or between a conductor and the ground) shall be in accordance with
Health and Safety Code, Title 9, Subtitle A, Chapter 752.
2. Warning sign
a. Provide sign of sufficient size meeting all OSHA requirements.
3. Equipment operating within 10 feet of high voltage lines will require the following
safety features
a. Insulating cage-type of guard about the boom or arm
b. Insulator links on the lift hook connections for back hoes or dippers
c. Equipment must meet the safety requirements as set forth by OSHA and the
safety requirements of the owner of the high voltage lines
4. Work within 6 feet of high voltage electric lines
a. Notification shall be given to:
1) The power company (example: ONCOR)
a) Maintain an accurate log of all such calls to power company and record
action taken in each case.
b. Coordination with power company
1) After notification coordinate with the power company to:
a) Erect temporary mechanical barriers, de-energize the lines, or raise or
lower the lines
c. No personnel may work within 6 feet of a high voltage line before the above
requirements have been met.
C. Confined Space Entry Program
1. Provide and follow approved Confined Space Entry Program in accordance with
OSHA requirements.
2. Confined Spaces include:
a. Manholes
b. All other confined spaces in accordance with OSHA’s Permit Required for
Confined Spaces
D. Use of Explosives, Drop Weight, Etc.
1. When Contract Documents permit on the project the following will apply:
a. Public Notification
1) Submit notice to City and proof of adequate insurance coverage, 24 hours
prior to commencing.
2) Minimum 24 hour public notification in accordance with Section 01 31 13
E. Water Department Coordination
1. During the construction of this project, it will be necessary to deactivate, for a
period of time, existing lines. The Contractor shall be required to coordinate with
the Water Department to determine the best times for deactivating and activating
those lines.
01 35 13 - 3
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 3 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August, 30, 2013
2. Coordinate any event that will require connecting to or the operation of an existing
City water line system with the City’s representative.
a. Coordination shall be in accordance with Section 33 12 25.
b. If needed, obtain a hydrant water meter from the Water Department for use
during the life of named project.
c. In the event that a water valve on an existing live system be turned off and on
to accommodate the construction of the project is required, coordinate this
activity through the appropriate City representative.
1) Do not operate water line valves of existing water system.
a) Failure to comply will render the Contractor in violation of Texas Penal
Code Title 7, Chapter 28.03 (Criminal Mischief) and the Contractor
will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
b) In addition, the Contractor will assume all liabilities and
responsibilities as a result of these actions.
F. Public Notification Prior to Beginning Construction
1. Prior to beginning construction on any block in the project, on a block by block
basis, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of the pending construction to the front
door of each residence or business that will be impacted by construction. The notice
shall be prepared as follows:
a. Post notice or flyer 7 days prior to beginning any construction activity on each
block in the project area.
1) Prepare flyer on the Contractor’s letterhead and include the following
information:
a) Name of Project
b) City Project No (CPN)
c) Scope of Project (i.e. type of construction activity)
d) Actual construction duration within the block
e) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number
f) Name of the City’s inspector and phone number
g) City’s after-hours phone number
2) A sample of the ‘pre-construction notification’ flyer is attached as Exhibit
A.
3) Submit schedule showing the construction start and finish time for each
block of the project to the inspector.
4) Deliver flyer to the City Inspector for review prior to distribution.
b. No construction will be allowed to begin on any block until the flyer is
delivered to all residents of the block.
G. Public Notification of Temporary Water Service Interruption during Construction
1. In the event it becomes necessary to temporarily shut down water service to
residents or businesses during construction, prepare and deliver a notice or flyer of
the pending interruption to the front door of each affected resident.
2. Prepared notice as follows:
a. The notification or flyer shall be posted 24 hours prior to the temporary
interruption.
b. Prepare flyer on the contractor’s letterhead and include the following
information:
1) Name of the project
2) City Project Number
01 35 13 - 4
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August, 30, 2013
3) Date of the interruption of service
4) Period the interruption will take place
5) Name of the contractor’s foreman and phone number
6) Name of the City’s inspector and phone number
c. A sample of the temporary water service interruption notification is attached as
Exhibit B.
d. Deliver a copy of the temporary interruption notification to the City inspector
for review prior to being distributed.
e. No interruption of water service can occur until the flyer has been delivered to
all affected residents and businesses.
f. Electronic versions of the sample flyers can be obtained from the Project
Construction Inspector.
H. Coordination with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
1. At locations in the Project where construction activities occur in areas where
USACE permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated
permit.
I. Coordination within Railroad Permit Areas
1. At locations in the project where construction activities occur in areas where
railroad permits are required, meet all requirements set forth in each designated
railroad permit. This includes, but is not limited to, provisions for:
a. Flagmen
b. Inspectors
c. Safety training
d. Additional insurance
e. Insurance certificates
f. Other employees required to protect the right-of-way and property of the
Railroad Company from damage arising out of and/or from the construction of
the project. Proper utility clearance procedures shall be used in accordance
with the permit guidelines.
2. Obtain any supplemental information needed to comply with the railroad’s
requirements.
J. Dust Control
1. Use acceptable measures to control dust at the Site.
a. If water is used to control dust, capture and properly dispose of waste water.
b. If wet saw cutting is performed, capture and properly dispose of slurry.
K. Employee Parking
1. Provide parking for employees at locations approved by the City.
01 35 13 - 5
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 5 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August, 30, 2013
1.4 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.5 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.9 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.10 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.11 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson
1.3.B – Added requirement of compliance with Health and Safety Code, Title 9.
Safety, Subtitle A. Public Safety, Chapter 752. High Voltage Overhead Lines.
01 35 13 - 6
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 6 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August, 30, 2013
EXHIBIT A
(To be printed on Contractor’s Letterhead)
Date:
CPN No.:
Project Name:
Mapsco Location:
Limits of Construction:
THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT UNDER A CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF FORT
WORTH, OUR COMPANY WILL WORK ON UTILITY LINES ON OR AROUND YOUR
PROPERTY.
CONSTRUCTION WILL BEGIN APPROXIMATELY SEVEN DAYS FROM THE DATE
OF THIS NOTICE.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESS, SECURITY, SAFETY OR ANY OTHER
ISSUE, PLEASE CALL:
Mr. <CONTRACTOR’S SUPERINTENDENT> AT <TELEPHONE NO.>
OR
Mr. <CITY INSPECTOR> AT < TELEPHONE NO.>
AFTER 4:30 PM OR ON WEEKENDS, PLEASE CALL (817) 392 8306
PLEASE KEEP THIS FLYER HANDY WHEN YOU CALL
01 35 13 - 7
DAP SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES
Page 7 of 7
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August, 30, 2013
EXHIBIT B
01 45 23 - 1
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
SECTION 01 45 23
TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Testing and inspection services procedures and coordination
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
a. Contractor is responsible for performing, coordinating, and payment of all
Quality Control testing.
b. City is responsible for performing and payment for first set of Quality
Assurance testing.
1) If the first Quality Assurance test performed by the City fails, the
Contractor is responsible for payment of subsequent Quality Assurance
testing until a passing test occurs.
a) Final acceptance will not be issued by City until all required payments
for testing by Contractor have been paid in full.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Testing
1. Complete testing in accordance with the Contract Documents.
2. Coordination
a. When testing is required to be performed by the City, notify City, sufficiently
in advance, when testing is needed.
b. When testing is required to be completed by the Contractor, notify City,
sufficiently in advance, that testing will be performed.
3. Distribution of Testing Reports
a. Electronic Distribution
1) Confirm development of Project directory for electronic submittals to be
uploaded to City’s Buzzsaw site, or another form of distribution approved
by the City.
01 45 23 - 2
DAP TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised August 30, 2013
2) Upload test reports to designated project directory and notify appropriate
City representatives via email of submittal posting.
3) Hard Copies
a) 1 copy for all submittals submitted to the Project Representative
b. Hard Copy Distribution (if required in lieu of electronic distribution)
1) Tests performed by City
a) Distribute 1 hard copy to the Contractor
2) Tests performed by the Contractor
a) Distribute 3 hard copies to City’s Project Representative
4. Provide City’s Project Representative with trip tickets for each delivered load of
Concrete or Lime material including the following information:
a. Name of pit
b. Date of delivery
c. Material delivered
B. Inspection
1. Inspection or lack of inspection does not relieve the Contractor from obligation to
perform work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 50 00 - 1
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised JULY 1, 2011
SECTION 01 50 00
TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Provide temporary facilities and controls needed for the Work including, but not
necessarily limited to:
a. Temporary utilities
b. Sanitary facilities
c. Storage Sheds and Buildings
d. Dust control
e. Temporary fencing of the construction site
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Temporary Utilities
1. Obtaining Temporary Service
a. Make arrangements with utility service companies for temporary services.
b. Abide by rules and regulations of utility service companies or authorities
having jurisdiction.
c. Be responsible for utility service costs until Work is approved for Final
Acceptance.
1) Included are fuel, power, light, heat and other utility services necessary for
execution, completion, testing and initial operation of Work.
2. Water
a. Contractor to provide water required for and in connection with Work to be
performed and for specified tests of piping, equipment, devices or other use as
required for the completion of the Work.
b. Provide and maintain adequate supply of potable water for domestic
consumption by Contractor personnel and City’s Project Representatives.
c. Coordination
1) Contact City 1 week before water for construction is desired
01 50 00 - 2
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised JULY 1, 2011
d. Contractor Payment for Construction Water
1) Obtain construction water meter from City for payment as billed by City’s
established rates.
3. Electricity and Lighting
a. Provide and pay for electric powered service as required for Work, including
testing of Work.
1) Provide power for lighting, operation of equipment, or other use.
b. Electric power service includes temporary power service or generator to
maintain operations during scheduled shutdown.
4. Telephone
a. Provide emergency telephone service at Site for use by Contractor personnel
and others performing work or furnishing services at Site.
5. Temporary Heat and Ventilation
a. Provide temporary heat as necessary for protection or completion of Work.
b. Provide temporary heat and ventilation to assure safe working conditions.
B. Sanitary Facilities
1. Provide and maintain sanitary facilities for persons on Site.
a. Comply with regulations of State and local departments of health.
2. Enforce use of sanitary facilities by construction personnel at job site.
a. Enclose and anchor sanitary facilities.
b. No discharge will be allowed from these facilities.
c. Collect and store sewage and waste so as not to cause nuisance or health
problem.
d. Haul sewage and waste off-site at no less than weekly intervals and properly
dispose in accordance with applicable regulation.
3. Locate facilities near Work Site and keep clean and maintained throughout Project.
4. Remove facilities at completion of Project
C. Storage Sheds and Buildings
1. Provide adequately ventilated, watertight, weatherproof storage facilities with floor
above ground level for materials and equipment susceptible to weather damage.
2. Storage of materials not susceptible to weather damage may be on blocks off
ground.
3. Store materials in a neat and orderly manner.
a. Place materials and equipment to permit easy access for identification,
inspection and inventory.
4. Equip building with lockable doors and lighting, and provide electrical service for
equipment space heaters and heating or ventilation as necessary to provide storage
environments acceptable to specified manufacturers.
5. Fill and grade site for temporary structures to provide drainage away from
temporary and existing buildings.
6. Remove building from site prior to Final Acceptance.
D. Temporary Fencing
1. Provide and maintain for the duration or construction when required in contract
documents
E. Dust Control
01 50 00 - 3
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised JULY 1, 2011
1. Contractor is responsible for maintaining dust control through the duration of the
project.
a. Contractor remains on-call at all times
b. Must respond in a timely manner
F. Temporary Protection of Construction
1. Contractor or subcontractors are responsible for protecting Work from damage due
to weather.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 INSTALLATION
A. Temporary Facilities
1. Maintain all temporary facilities for duration of construction activities as needed.
3.5 [REPAIR] / [RESTORATION]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES
A. Temporary Facilities
01 50 00 - 4
DAP TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised JULY 1, 2011
1. Remove all temporary facilities and restore area after completion of the Work, to a
condition equal to or better than prior to start of Work.
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 55 26 - 1
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised July 1, 2011
SECTION 01 55 26
STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Administrative procedures for:
a. Street Use Permit
b. Modification of approved traffic control
c. Removal of Street Signs
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 34 71 13 – Traffic Control
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES
A. Reference Standards
1. Reference standards cited in this specification refer to the current reference standard
published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
2. Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD).
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Traffic Control
1. General
a. When traffic control plans are included in the Drawings, provide Traffic
Control in accordance with Drawings and Section 34 71 13.
b. When traffic control plans are not included in the Drawings, prepare traffic
control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13 and submit to City for
review.
1) Allow minimum 10 working days for review of proposed Traffic Control.
B. Street Use Permit
1. Prior to installation of Traffic Control, a City Street Use Permit is required.
a. To obtain Street Use Permit, submit Traffic Control Plans to City
Transportation and Public Works Department.
01 55 26 - 2
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised July 1, 2011
1) Allow a minimum of 5 working days for permit review.
2) Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control plans for
Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed.
C. Modification to Approved Traffic Control
1. Prior to installation traffic control:
a. Submit revised traffic control plans to City Department Transportation and
Public Works Department.
1) Revise Traffic Control plans in accordance with Section 34 71 13.
2) Allow minimum 5 working days for review of revised Traffic Control.
3) It is the Contractor’s responsibility to coordinate review of Traffic Control
plans for Street Use Permit, such that construction is not delayed.
D. Removal of Street Sign
1. If it is determined that a street sign must be removed for construction, then contact
City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs and Markings Division to
remove the sign.
E. Temporary Signage
1. In the case of regulatory signs, replace permanent sign with temporary sign meeting
requirements of the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD).
2. Install temporary sign before the removal of permanent sign.
3. When construction is complete, to the extent that the permanent sign can be
reinstalled, contact the City Transportation and Public Works Department, Signs
and Markings Division, to reinstall the permanent sign.
F. Traffic Control Standards
1. Traffic Control Standards can be found on the City’s Buzzsaw website.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
01 55 26 - 3
DAP STREET USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised July 1, 2011
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 57 13 - 1
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised July 1, 2011
SECTION 01 57 13
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Procedures for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the
Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 31 25 00 – Erosion and Sediment Control
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Construction Activities resulting in less than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items
bid. No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
2. Construction Activities resulting in greater than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Measurement and Payment shall be in accordance with Section 31 25 00.
1.3 REFERENCES
A. Abbreviations and Acronyms
1. Notice of Intent: NOI
2. Notice of Termination: NOT
3. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: SWPPP
4. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality: TCEQ
5. Notice of Change: NOC
A. Reference Standards
1. Reference standards cited in this Specification refer to the current reference
standard published at the time of the latest revision date logged at the end of this
Specification, unless a date is specifically cited.
2. Integrated Storm Management (iSWM) Technical Manual for Construction
Controls
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. General
1. Contractor is responsible for resolution and payment of any fines issued associated
with compliance to Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
01 57 13 - 2
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised July 1, 2011
B. Construction Activities resulting in:
1. Less than 1 acre of disturbance
a. Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with Section 31 25 00 and
Drawings.
2. 1 to less than 5 acres of disturbance
a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction
Permit is required
b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements
1) TCEQ Small Construction Site Notice Required under general permit
TXR150000
a) Sign and post at job site
b) Prior to Preconstruction Meeting, send 1 copy to City Department of
Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division, (817) 392-
6088.
2) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with:
a) Section 31 25 00
b) The Drawings
c) TXR150000 General Permit
d) SWPPP
e) TCEQ requirements
3. 5 acres or more of Disturbance
a. Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Construction
Permit is required
b. Complete SWPPP in accordance with TCEQ requirements
1) Prepare a TCEQ NOI form and submit to TCEQ along with required fee
a) Sign and post at job site
b) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works,
Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088.
2) TCEQ Notice of Change required if making changes or updates to NOI
3) Provide erosion and sediment control in accordance with:
a) Section 31 25 00
b) The Drawings
c) TXR150000 General Permit
d) SWPPP
e) TCEQ requirements
4) Once the project has been completed and all the closeout requirements of
TCEQ have been met a TCEQ Notice of Termination can be submitted.
a) Send copy to City Department of Transportation and Public Works,
Environmental Division, (817) 392-6088.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. SWPPP
1. Submit in accordance with Section 01 33 00, except as stated herein.
a. Prior to the Preconstruction Meeting, submit a draft copy of SWPPP to the City
as follows:
1) 1 copy to the City Project Manager
a) City Project Manager will forward to the City Department of
Transportation and Public Works, Environmental Division for review
01 57 13 - 3
DAP STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised July 1, 2011
B. Modified SWPPP
1. If the SWPPP is revised during construction, resubmit modified SWPPP to the City
in accordance with Section 01 33 00.
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
01 60 00 - 1
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 60 00
PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. References for Product Requirements and City Standard Products List
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES [NOT USED]
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. A list of City approved products for use is located on Buzzsaw as follows:
1. Resources\02 - Construction Documents\Standard Products List
B. Only products specifically included on City’s Standard Product List in these Contract
Documents shall be allowed for use on the Project.
1. Any subsequently approved products will only be allowed for use upon specific
approval by the City.
C. Any specific product requirements in the Contract Documents supersede similar
products included on the City’s Standard Product List.
1. The City reserves the right to not allow products to be used for certain projects even
though the product is listed on the City’s Standard Product List.
D. Although a specific product is included on City’s Standard Product List, not all
products from that manufacturer are approved for use, including but not limited to, that
manufacturer’s standard product.
E. See Section 01 33 00 for submittal requirements of Product Data included on City’s
Standard Product List.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
01 60 00 - 2
DAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
10/12/12 D. Johnson Modified Location of City’s Standard Product List
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 66 00 - 1
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 66 00
PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Scheduling of product delivery
2. Packaging of products for delivery
3. Protection of products against damage from:
a. Handling
b. Exposure to elements or harsh environments
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY AND HANDLING
A. Delivery Requirements
1. Schedule delivery of products or equipment as required to allow timely installation
and to avoid prolonged storage.
2. Provide appropriate personnel and equipment to receive deliveries.
3. Delivery trucks will not be permitted to wait extended periods of time on the Site
for personnel or equipment to receive the delivery.
01 66 00 - 2
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
4. Deliver products or equipment in manufacturer's original unbroken cartons or other
containers designed and constructed to protect the contents from physical or
environmental damage.
5. Clearly and fully mark and identify as to manufacturer, item and installation
location.
6. Provide manufacturer's instructions for storage and handling.
B. Handling Requirements
1. Handle products or equipment in accordance with these Contract Documents and
manufacturer’s recommendations and instructions.
C. Storage Requirements
1. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations and
requirements of these Specifications.
2. Make necessary provisions for safe storage of materials and equipment.
a. Place loose soil materials and materials to be incorporated into Work to prevent
damage to any part of Work or existing facilities and to maintain free access at
all times to all parts of Work and to utility service company installations in
vicinity of Work.
3. Keep materials and equipment neatly and compactly stored in locations that will
cause minimum inconvenience to other contractors, public travel, adjoining owners,
tenants and occupants.
a. Arrange storage to provide easy access for inspection.
4. Restrict storage to areas available on construction site for storage of material and
equipment as shown on Drawings, or approved by City’s Project Representative.
5. Provide off-site storage and protection when on-site storage is not adequate.
a. Provide addresses of and access to off-site storage locations for inspection by
City’s Project Representative.
6. Do not use lawns, grass plots or other private property for storage purposes without
written permission of owner or other person in possession or control of premises.
7. Store in manufacturers’ unopened containers.
8. Neatly, safely and compactly stack materials delivered and stored along line of
Work to avoid inconvenience and damage to property owners and general public
and maintain at least 3 feet from fire hydrant.
9. Keep public and private driveways and street crossings open.
10. Repair or replace damaged lawns, sidewalks, streets or other improvements to
satisfaction of City’s Project Representative.
a. Total length which materials may be distributed along route of construction at
one time is 1,000 linear feet, unless otherwise approved in writing by City’s
Project Representative.
01 66 00 - 3
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 ERECTION [NOT USED]
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL
A. Tests and Inspections
1. Inspect all products or equipment delivered to the site prior to unloading.
B. Non-Conforming Work
1. Reject all products or equipment that are damaged, used or in any other way
unsatisfactory for use on the project.
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION
A. Protect all products or equipment in accordance with manufacturer's written directions.
B. Store products or equipment in location to avoid physical damage to items while in
storage.
C. Protect equipment from exposure to elements and keep thoroughly dry if required by
the manufacturer.
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
01 66 00 - 4
DAP PRODUCT STORAGE AND HANDLING REQUIREMENTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 70 00 - 1
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 70 00
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Mobilization and Demobilization
a. Mobilization
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies
to the Site
2) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation
at the Site
3) Premiums paid for performance and payment bonds
4) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies
to another location within the designated Site
5) Relocation of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation
from 1 location to another location on the Site.
b. Demobilization
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies
away from the Site including disassembly
2) Site Clean-up
3) Removal of all buildings and/or other facilities assembled at the Site for this
Contract
c. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of
work that are for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract.
2. Remobilization
a. Remobilization for Suspension of Work specifically required in the Contract
Documents or as required by City includes:
1) Demobilization
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies from the Site including disassembly or temporarily securing
equipment, supplies, and other facilities as designated by the Contract
Documents necessary to suspend the Work.
b) Site Clean-up as designated in the Contract Documents
2) Remobilization
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to the Site necessary to resume the Work.
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s
operation at the Site necessary to resume the Work.
3) No Payments will be made for:
a) Mobilization and Demobilization from one location to another on the
Site in the normal progress of performing the Work.
b) Stand-by or idle time
c) Lost profits
3. Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects
a. Mobilization and Demobilization
01 70 00 - 2
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1) Mobilization shall consist of the activities and cost on a Work Order basis
necessary for:
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies to the Site for the issued Work Order.
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s
operation at the Site for the issued Work Order
2) Demobilization shall consist of the activities and cost necessary for:
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating
supplies from the Site including disassembly for each issued Work
Order
b) Site Clean-up for each issued Work Order
c) Removal of all buildings or other facilities assembled at the Site for
each Work Oder
b. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of
work for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract.
4. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilization for Miscellaneous Projects
a. A Mobilization for Miscellaneous Projects when directed by the City and the
mobilization occurs within 24 hours of the issuance of the Work Order.
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Mobilization and Demobilization
a. Measure
1) This Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
b. Payment
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
are subsidiary to the various Items bid and no other compensation will be
allowed.
2. Remobilization for suspension of Work as specifically required in the Contract
Documents
a. Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be per each remobilization performed.
b. Payment
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Specified Remobilization” in accordance with Contract
Documents.
c. The price shall include:
1) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.1)
2) Remobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.2.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
01 70 00 - 3
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
3. Remobilization for suspension of Work as required by City
a. Measurement and Payment
1) This shall be submitted as a Contract Claim in accordance with Article 10
of Section 00 72 00.
2) No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated
with this Item.
4. Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects
a. Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents
b. Payment
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Work Order Mobilization” in accordance with Contract
Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to mobilization
and shall not be paid for separately.
c. The price shall include:
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.1)
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
5. Emergency Mobilizations and Demobilizations for Miscellaneous Projects
a. Measurement
1) Measurement for this Item shall be for each Mobilization and
Demobilization required by the Contract Documents
b. Payment
1) The Work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item
and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit
price per each “Work Order Emergency Mobilization” in accordance with
Contract Documents. Demobilization shall be considered subsidiary to
mobilization and shall not be paid for separately.
c. The price shall include
1) Mobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.4.a)
2) Demobilization as described in Section 1.1.A.3.a.2)
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this
Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
01 70 00 - 4
DAP MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 74 23 - 1
DAP CLEANING
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 74 23
CLEANING
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Intermediate and final cleaning for Work not including special cleaning of closed
systems specified elsewhere
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
3. Section 32 92 13 – Hydro-Mulching, Seeding and Sodding
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Scheduling
1. Schedule cleaning operations so that dust and other contaminants disturbed by
cleaning process will not fall on newly painted surfaces.
2. Schedule final cleaning upon completion of Work and immediately prior to final
inspection.
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]
1.10 STORAGE, AND HANDLING
A. Storage and Handling Requirements
1. Store cleaning products and cleaning wastes in containers specifically designed for
those materials.
01 74 23 - 2
DAP CLEANING
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED]
2.2 MATERIALS
A. Cleaning Agents
1. Compatible with surface being cleaned
2. New and uncontaminated
3. For manufactured surfaces
a. Material recommended by manufacturer
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 APPLICATION [NOT USED]
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING
A. General
1. Prevent accumulation of wastes that create hazardous conditions.
2. Conduct cleaning and disposal operations to comply with laws and safety orders of
governing authorities.
3. Do not dispose of volatile wastes such as mineral spirits, oil or paint thinner in
storm or sanitary drains or sewers.
4. Dispose of degradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site.
5. Dispose of nondegradable debris at an approved solid waste disposal site or in an
alternate manner approved by City and regulatory agencies.
01 74 23 - 3
DAP CLEANING
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
6. Handle materials in a controlled manner with as few handlings as possible.
7. Thoroughly clean, sweep, wash and polish all Work and equipment associated with
this project.
8. Remove all signs of temporary construction and activities incidental to construction
of required permanent Work.
9. If project is not cleaned to the satisfaction of the City, the City reserves the right to
have the cleaning completed at the expense of the Contractor.
10. Do not burn on-site.
B. Intermediate Cleaning during Construction
1. Keep Work areas clean so as not to hinder health, safety or convenience of
personnel in existing facility operations.
2. At maximum weekly intervals, dispose of waste materials, debris and rubbish.
3. Confine construction debris daily in strategically located container(s):
a. Cover to prevent blowing by wind
b. Store debris away from construction or operational activities
c. Haul from site at a minimum of once per week
4. Vacuum clean interior areas when ready to receive finish painting.
a. Continue vacuum cleaning on an as-needed basis, until Final Acceptance.
5. Prior to storm events, thoroughly clean site of all loose or unsecured items, which
may become airborne or transported by flowing water during the storm.
C. Exterior (Site or Right of Way) Final Cleaning
1. Remove trash and debris containers from site.
a. Re-seed areas disturbed by location of trash and debris containers in accordance
with Section 32 92 13.
2. Sweep roadway to remove all rocks, pieces of asphalt, concrete or any other object
that may hinder or disrupt the flow of traffic along the roadway.
3. Clean any interior areas including, but not limited to, vaults, manholes, structures,
junction boxes and inlets.
4. If no longer required for maintenance of erosion facilities, and upon approval by
City, remove erosion control from site.
5. Clean signs, lights, signals, etc.
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
01 74 23 - 4
DAP CLEANING
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 77 19 - 1
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 77 19
CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. The procedure for closing out a contract
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Guarantees, Bonds and Affidavits
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until all guarantees, bonds,
certificates, licenses and affidavits required for Work or equipment as specified are
satisfactorily filed with the City.
B. Release of Liens or Claims
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until satisfactory evidence of
release of liens has been submitted to the City.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submit all required documentation to City’s Project Representative.
01 77 19 - 2
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURE
A. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, submit:
1. Project Record Documents in accordance with Section 01 78 39
2. Operation and Maintenance Data, if required, in accordance with Section 01 78 23
B. Prior to requesting Final Inspection, perform final cleaning in accordance with Section
01 74 23.
C. Final Inspection
1. After final cleaning, provide notice to the City Project Representative that the Work
is completed.
a. The City will make an initial Final Inspection with the Contractor present.
b. Upon completion of this inspection, the City will notify the Contractor, in
writing within 10 business days, of any particulars in which this inspection
reveals that the Work is defective or incomplete.
2. Upon receiving written notice from the City, immediately undertake the Work
required to remedy deficiencies and complete the Work to the satisfaction of the
City.
3. Upon completion of Work associated with the items listed in the City's written
notice, inform the City, that the required Work has been completed. Upon receipt
of this notice, the City, in the presence of the Contractor, will make a subsequent
Final Inspection of the project.
4. Provide all special accessories required to place each item of equipment in full
operation. These special accessory items include, but are not limited to:
a. Specified spare parts
b. Adequate oil and grease as required for the first lubrication of the equipment
c. Initial fill up of all chemical tanks and fuel tanks
d. Light bulbs
e. Fuses
f. Vault keys
g. Handwheels
h. Other expendable items as required for initial start-up and operation of all
equipment
D. Notice of Project Completion
01 77 19 - 3
DAP CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1. Once the City Project Representative finds the Work subsequent to Final Inspection
to be satisfactory, the City will issue a Notice of Project Completion (Green Sheet).
E. Supporting Documentation
1. Coordinate with the City Project Representative to complete the following
additional forms:
a. Final Payment Request
b. Statement of Contract Time
c. Affidavit of Payment and Release of Liens
d. Consent of Surety to Final Payment
e. Pipe Report (if required)
f. Contractor’s Evaluation of City
g. Performance Evaluation of Contractor
F. Letter of Final Acceptance
1. Upon review and acceptance of Notice of Project Completion and Supporting
Documentation, in accordance with General Conditions, City will issue Letter of
Final Acceptance and release the Final Payment Request for payment.
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP application
01 78 23 - 1
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 1 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 78 23
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Product data and related information appropriate for City's maintenance and
operation of products furnished under Contract
2. Such products may include, but are not limited to:
a. Traffic Controllers
b. Irrigation Controllers (to be operated by the City)
c. Butterfly Valves
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Schedule
1. Submit manuals in final form to the City within 30 calendar days of product
shipment to the project site.
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 01 33 00. All submittals shall be
approved by the City prior to delivery.
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS
A. Submittal Form
1. Prepare data in form of an instructional manual for use by City personnel.
2. Format
a. Size: 8 ½ inches x 11 inches
b. Paper
1) 40 pound minimum, white, for typed pages
2) Holes reinforced with plastic, cloth or metal
c. Text: Manufacturer’s printed data, or neatly typewritten
01 78 23 - 2
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 2 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
d. Drawings
1) Provide reinforced punched binder tab, bind in with text
2) Reduce larger drawings and fold to size of text pages.
e. Provide fly-leaf for each separate product, or each piece of operating
equipment.
1) Provide typed description of product, and major component parts of
equipment.
2) Provide indexed tabs.
f. Cover
1) Identify each volume with typed or printed title "OPERATING AND
MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS".
2) List:
a) Title of Project
b) Identity of separate structure as applicable
c) Identity of general subject matter covered in the manual
3. Binders
a. Commercial quality 3-ring binders with durable and cleanable plastic covers
b. When multiple binders are used, correlate the data into related consistent
groupings.
4. If available, provide an electronic form of the O&M Manual.
B. Manual Content
1. Neatly typewritten table of contents for each volume, arranged in systematic order
a. Contractor, name of responsible principal, address and telephone number
b. A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the volume
c. List, with each product:
1) The name, address and telephone number of the subcontractor or installer
2) A list of each product required to be included, indexed to content of the
volume
3) Identify area of responsibility of each
4) Local source of supply for parts and replacement
d. Identify each product by product name and other identifying symbols as set
forth in Contract Documents.
2. Product Data
a. Include only those sheets which are pertinent to the specific product.
b. Annotate each sheet to:
1) Clearly identify specific product or part installed
2) Clearly identify data applicable to installation
3) Delete references to inapplicable information
3. Drawings
a. Supplement product data with drawings as necessary to clearly illustrate:
1) Relations of component parts of equipment and systems
2) Control and flow diagrams
b. Coordinate drawings with information in Project Record Documents to assure
correct illustration of completed installation.
c. Do not use Project Record Drawings as maintenance drawings.
4. Written text, as required to supplement product data for the particular installation:
a. Organize in consistent format under separate headings for different procedures.
b. Provide logical sequence of instructions of each procedure.
01 78 23 - 3
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 3 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
5. Copy of each warranty, bond and service contract issued
a. Provide information sheet for City personnel giving:
1) Proper procedures in event of failure
2) Instances which might affect validity of warranties or bonds
C. Manual for Materials and Finishes
1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
2. Content, for architectural products, applied materials and finishes:
a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
1) Catalog number, size, composition
2) Color and texture designations
3) Information required for reordering special manufactured products
b. Instructions for care and maintenance
1) Manufacturer's recommendation for types of cleaning agents and methods
2) Cautions against cleaning agents and methods which are detrimental to
product
3) Recommended schedule for cleaning and maintenance
3. Content, for moisture protection and weather exposure products:
a. Manufacturer's data, giving full information on products
1) Applicable standards
2) Chemical composition
3) Details of installation
b. Instructions for inspection, maintenance and repair
D. Manual for Equipment and Systems
1. Submit 5 copies of complete manual in final form.
2. Content, for each unit of equipment and system, as appropriate:
a. Description of unit and component parts
1) Function, normal operating characteristics and limiting conditions
2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
b. Operating procedures
1) Start-up, break-in, routine and normal operating instructions
2) Regulation, control, stopping, shut-down and emergency instructions
3) Summer and winter operating instructions
4) Special operating instructions
c. Maintenance procedures
1) Routine operations
2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
4) Alignment, adjusting and checking
d. Servicing and lubrication schedule
1) List of lubricants required
e. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
f. Description of sequence of operation by control manufacturer
1) Predicted life of parts subject to wear
2) Items recommended to be stocked as spare parts
g. As installed control diagrams by controls manufacturer
h. Each contractor's coordination drawings
1) As installed color coded piping diagrams
01 78 23 - 4
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 4 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
i. Charts of valve tag numbers, with location and function of each valve
j. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
k. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
3. Content, for each electric and electronic system, as appropriate:
a. Description of system and component parts
1) Function, normal operating characteristics, and limiting conditions
2) Performance curves, engineering data and tests
3) Complete nomenclature and commercial number of replaceable parts
b. Circuit directories of panelboards
1) Electrical service
2) Controls
3) Communications
c. As installed color coded wiring diagrams
d. Operating procedures
1) Routine and normal operating instructions
2) Sequences required
3) Special operating instructions
e. Maintenance procedures
1) Routine operations
2) Guide to "trouble shooting"
3) Disassembly, repair and reassembly
4) Adjustment and checking
f. Manufacturer's printed operating and maintenance instructions
g. List of original manufacturer's spare parts, manufacturer's current prices, and
recommended quantities to be maintained in storage
h. Other data as required under pertinent Sections of Specifications
4. Prepare and include additional data when the need for such data becomes apparent
during instruction of City's personnel.
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Provide operation and maintenance data by personnel with the following criteria:
1. Trained and experienced in maintenance and operation of described products
2. Skilled as technical writer to the extent required to communicate essential data
3. Skilled as draftsman competent to prepare required drawings
01 78 23 - 5
DAP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
Page 5 of 5
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED]
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
8/31/2012 D. Johnson 1.5.A.1 – title of section removed
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
01 78 39 - 1
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
SECTION 01 78 39
PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
A. Section Includes:
1. Work associated with the documenting the project and recording changes to project
documents, including:
a. Record Drawings
b. Water Meter Service Reports
c. Sanitary Sewer Service Reports
d. Large Water Meter Reports
B. Deviations from this City of Fort Worth Standard Specification
1. None.
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract
2. Division 1 – General Requirements
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
A. Measurement and Payment
1. Work associated with this Item is considered subsidiary to the various Items bid.
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item.
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED]
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED]
1.5 SUBMITTALS
A. Prior to submitting a request for Final Inspection, deliver Project Record Documents to
City’s Project Representative.
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED]
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. Accuracy of Records
1. Thoroughly coordinate changes within the Record Documents, making adequate
and proper entries on each page of Specifications and each sheet of Drawings and
other Documents where such entry is required to show the change properly.
2. Accuracy of records shall be such that future search for items shown in the Contract
Documents may rely reasonably on information obtained from the approved Project
Record Documents.
01 78 39 - 2
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
3. To facilitate accuracy of records, make entries within 24 hours after receipt of
information that the change has occurred.
4. Provide factual information regarding all aspects of the Work, both concealed and
visible, to enable future modification of the Work to proceed without lengthy and
expensive site measurement, investigation and examination.
1.10 STORAGE AND HANDLING
A. Storage and Handling Requirements
1. Maintain the job set of Record Documents completely protected from deterioration
and from loss and damage until completion of the Work and transfer of all recorded
data to the final Project Record Documents.
2. In the event of loss of recorded data, use means necessary to again secure the data
to the City's approval.
a. In such case, provide replacements to the standards originally required by the
Contract Documents.
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED]
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED]
PART 2 - PRODUCTS
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIED PRODUCTS [NOT USED]
2.2 RECORD DOCUMENTS
A. Job set
1. Promptly following receipt of the Notice to Proceed, secure from the City, at no
charge to the Contractor, 1 complete set of all Documents comprising the Contract.
B. Final Record Documents
1. At a time nearing the completion of the Work and prior to Final Inspection, provide
the City 1 complete set of all Final Record Drawings in the Contract.
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED]
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
PART 3 - EXECUTION
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED]
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED]
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]
3.4 MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS
A. Maintenance of Job Set
1. Immediately upon receipt of the job set, identify each of the Documents with the
title, "RECORD DOCUMENTS - JOB SET".
01 78 39 - 3
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
2. Preservation
a. Considering the Contract completion time, the probable number of occasions
upon which the job set must be taken out for new entries and for examination,
and the conditions under which these activities will be performed, devise a
suitable method for protecting the job set.
b. Do not use the job set for any purpose except entry of new data and for review
by the City, until start of transfer of data to final Project Record Documents.
c. Maintain the job set at the site of work.
3. Coordination with Construction Survey
a. At a minimum clearly mark any deviations from Contract Documents
associated with installation of the infrastructure.
4. Making entries on Drawings
a. Record any deviations from Contract Documents.
b. Use an erasable colored pencil (not ink or indelible pencil), clearly describe the
change by graphic line and note as required.
c. Date all entries.
d. Call attention to the entry by a "cloud" drawn around the area or areas affected.
e. In the event of overlapping changes, use different colors for the overlapping
changes.
5. Conversion of schematic layouts
a. In some cases on the Drawings, arrangements of conduits, circuits, piping,
ducts, and similar items, are shown schematically and are not intended to
portray precise physical layout.
1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the
City's approval.
2) However, design of future modifications of the facility may require
accurate information as to the final physical layout of items which are
shown only schematically on the Drawings.
b. Show on the job set of Record Drawings, by dimension accurate to within 1
inch, the centerline of each run of items.
1) Final physical arrangement is determined by the Contractor, subject to the
City's approval.
2) Show, by symbol or note, the vertical location of the Item ("under slab", "in
ceiling plenum", "exposed", and the like).
3) Make all identification sufficiently descriptive that it may be related
reliably to the Specifications.
c. The City may waive the requirements for conversion of schematic layouts
where, in the City's judgment, conversion serves no useful purpose. However,
do not rely upon waivers being issued except as specifically issued in writing
by the City.
B. Final Project Record Documents
1. Transfer of data to Drawings
a. Carefully transfer change data shown on the job set of Record Drawings to the
corresponding final documents, coordinating the changes as required.
b. Clearly indicate at each affected detail and other Drawing a full description of
changes made during construction, and the actual location of items.
c. Call attention to each entry by drawing a "cloud" around the area or areas
affected.
01 78 39 - 4
DAP PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF FORT WORTH Tradition, Central Phase 1B
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS – DEVELOPER AWARDED PROJECTS City Project #102509
Revised April 7, 2014
d. Make changes neatly, consistently and with the proper media to assure
longevity and clear reproduction.
2. Transfer of data to other Documents
a. If the Documents, other than Drawings, have been kept clean during progress of
the Work, and if entries thereon have been orderly to the approval of the City,
the job set of those Documents, other than Drawings, will be accepted as final
Record Documents.
b. If any such Document is not so approved by the City, secure a new copy of that
Document from the City at the City's usual charge for reproduction and
handling, and carefully transfer the change data to the new copy to the approval
of the City.
3.5 REPAIR / RESTORATION [NOT USED]
3.6 RE-INSTALLATION [NOT USED]
3.7 FIELD [OR] SITE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED]
3.8 SYSTEM STARTUP [NOT USED]
3.9 ADJUSTING [NOT USED]
3.10 CLEANING [NOT USED]
3.11 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES [NOT USED]
3.12 PROTECTION [NOT USED]
3.13 MAINTENANCE [NOT USED]
3.14 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED]
END OF SECTION
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
4/7/2014 M.Domenech Revised for DAP Application
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Dallas • Fort Worth • Houston • San Antonio
Geotechnical
Construction Materials
Environmental
TBPE Firm No. 813
5058 Brush Creek Road
Fort Worth, Texas 76119
Tel: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
October 14, 2019
Hines Interest, LP - Dallas
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4200 W
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attention: Mr. Curtis Attaway
Re: Pavement Recommendations
Tradition, Central and Southern Phase
Off Sam Reynolds Road
Fort Worth, Texas
ALPHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
Submitted herein are the recommended pavement sections for the proposed subdivision
(Tradition, Central and Southern Phase). The proposed subdivision is generally located on the
south side of Sam Reynolds Road, extending about 4,500 ft west of Faith Lane in Fort Worth,
Texas. This study was authorized by Mr. Curtis Attaway on August 21, 2019 and performed in
accordance with ALPHA Proposal No. 77293-rev3 dated August 21, 2019. This report is an
extension of ALPHA Report No. W191259 dated September 30, 2019 containing geotechnical
recommendations for residential foundations.
The purpose of this study is to develop pavement sections for the planned streets in the subject
subdivision in accordance with the City of Fort Worth Pavement Design Manual (January 2015).
We understand the proposed streets within the subdivision could be classified as “Residential -
Urban”, “Collector” or “Arterial”, as described in the referenced manual. Supplemental
information from the Traffic Impact Analysis for traffic analyses prepared by Goodwin &
Marshall dated April 15, 2019 was also used for design of Arterial and Collector street pavement
sections.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this geotechnical exploration is for ALPHA TESTING, INC. (ALPHA) to
evaluate for Hines Interests, LP - Dallas (Client) some of the physical and engineering properties
of subsurface materials at selected locations on the subject site with respect to formulation of
appropriate geotechnical design parameters for the proposed pavement. The field exploration
was accomplished by securing subsurface samples from widely spaced test borings performed
across the expanse of the site. Engineering analyses were performed from results of the field
exploration and results of laboratory tests performed on representative samples.
Also included are general comments pertaining to reasonably anticipated construction problems
and recommendations concerning earthwork and quality control testing during construction.
This information can be used to evaluate subsurface conditions and to aid in ascertaining
construction meets project specifications.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
2
Recommendations provided in this report were developed from information obtained in test
borings depicting subsurface conditions only at the specific boring locations and at the particular
time designated on the logs. Subsurface conditions at other locations may differ from those
observed at the boring locations, and subsurface conditions at boring locations may vary at
different times of the year. The scope of work may not fully define the variability of subsurface
materials and conditions that are present on the site.
The nature and extent of variations between borings may not become evident until construction.
If significant variations then appear evident, our office should be contacted to re-evaluate our
recommendations after performing on-site observations and possibly other tests.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Table A contains a summary of pavement section requirements for proposed streets at the subject
project.
TABLE A
Summary of Pavement Section Requirements
Street Classification Residential -
Urban Collector Arterial
PCC Pavement Thickness(in) placed
on lime stabilized subgrade soil 6 7 9
28-day Concrete Compressive
Strength (psi) 3,600 3,600 3,600
Subgrade Treatment 6 inches Lime 8 inches Lime 8 inches Lime
Application Rate (lbs per sq yd) 30 36 36
Reinforcing Bar No. 3 3 4
Reinforcing Bar Spacing (in) 18 18 18
Further recommendations and analyses used to develop the summary in Table A are provided
further in this report.
FIELD EXPLORATION
Subsurface conditions on the site were explored by drilling a total of 198 test borings (Borings 1
through 140, 143 through 194, and 219 through 224) to a depth of about 20 ft each. The test
borings were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 420 using standard rotary drilling
equipment. The approximate location of each boring is shown on the attached Boring Location
Plan, Figure 2.
Borings drilled for a bridge study (Borings 141 and 142) and for a utility study (Borings 195
through 218) will be issued under separate covers.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
3
Subsurface types encountered during the field exploration are presented on the attached Log of
Boring sheets (boring logs). These boring logs contain our Field Technician's and Engineer's
interpretation of conditions believed to exist between actual samples retrieved. Therefore, the
boring logs contain both factual and interpretive information. Lines delineating subsurface strata
on the boring logs are approximate and the actual transition between strata may be gradual.
LABORATORY TESTS
Selected samples of the subsurface materials were tested in the laboratory to evaluate their
engineering properties as a basis in providing recommendations for pavement sections des ign
and earthwork construction. The following laboratory tests were performed to facilitate
pavement section recommendations:
Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216)
Atterberg-Limits (ASTM D 4318)
Unconfined Compressive Strength (ASTM D 2166)
Sulfate Content (TX-145-E Part II)
Lime Series (Plasticity Index vs. Lime Content)
In addition to conventional laboratory testing to assess engineering properties of the soils
obtained, bulk samples were obtained from the site near the vicinity of Borings 2, 77, 135 and
147 for moisture-density relationship testing (standard Proctor, ASTM D 698) and California
Bearing Ratio testing (CBR, ASTM D 1183). Individual test results are presented on the
attached Log of Boring or summary data sheets.
GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Based on geological maps available from the Bureau of Economic Geology, published by The
University of Texas at Austin, the project site lies within the undivided Fort Worth Limestone
and Duck Creek formation. This undivided formation generally consists of alternating layers of
limestone and marl (limey shale). Residual overburden soils associated with these undivided
formations generally consist of clay soils characterized by moderate to high shrink-swell
potential.
Subsurface conditions encountered in about four-fifths of the borings generally consisted of clay
and/or shaly clay to depths of about 6 inches to 18 ft below the ground surface underlain by
limestone and/or shale extending to the 20 ft termination depth. Limestone was encountered at
the surface in Borings 3, 8, 13, 38, 143, 150, 156, 174, 179, and 186. Clay extended to depths of
about 2 ft to 6 ft below the ground surface in Borings 219, 220, 223 and 224 underlain by
limestone extending to the 10 ft termination depth. Clay extended to th e 10 ft termination depth
of Borings 221 and 222. Subsurface conditions encountered in the remaining borings consisted
of clay or alternating layers of clay and limestone extending to the 20 ft termination depth. The
upper 2 ft of clay encountered in Boring 42 was visually classified as fill. Additional
stratigraphic information is presented on the attached Log of Boring sheets.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
4
Most of the materials encountered in the borings are considered relatively impermeable and are
anticipated to have a relatively slow response to water movement. Therefore, several days of
observation would be required to evaluate actual groundwater levels within the depths explored.
Also, the groundwater level at the subject site is anticipated to fluctuate seasonally depending on
the amount of rainfall, prevailing weather conditions, and subsurface drainage characteristics.
Free groundwater was encountered in several of the borings at depths of about 6 ft to 20 ft below
the ground surface. It is common to encounter seasonal groundwater from natural fractures
within the clayey matrix, at the soil/rock (limestone) interface or from fractures in the rock,
particularly during or after periods of precipitation. If more detailed groundwater information is
required, monitoring wells or piezometers can be installed.
Further details concerning subsurface materials and conditions encountered can be obtained from
the attached boring logs.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMENDATIONS
Calculations used to determine the required pavement thickness are based only on the physical
and engineering properties of the materials and conventional thickness determination procedures.
Related civil design factors such as subgrade drainage, shoulder support, cross-sectional
configurations, surface elevations, joint design and environmental factors will significantly affect
the service life and must be included in preparation of the construction drawings and
specifications but were not included in the scope of this study. Normal periodic maintenance
will be required for all pavement to achieve the design life of the pavement system.
Pavement Subgrade Preparation
Based on review of the borings and preliminary grading plans prepared by Goodwin and
Marshall (Tradition, Central and Southern Phase – Sheets 3 through 13 dated July 2019) it is
expected the pavement subgrade could consist of clay soils or similar onsite materials used for
grading the site. The pavement subgrade could also consist of limestone in some areas
depending on the given location along the alignment and grading requirements. Since the
subgrade conditions and required treatments could vary along the proposed road alignment,
ALPHA should be retained to observe construction to verify conditions are as expected. Also,
we should be provided with the final grading plan for review prior to construction to verify or
modify in writing the recommendations contained in this report.
The exposed clayey surface soils should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches and 8 inches for
Residential Urban and Collector/Arterial streets, respectively. Residential Urban and
Collector/Arterial streets should then be mixed with a minimum 30 and 36 lbs per sq yard of
hydrated lime (by dry soil weight), respectively, in conformance with TxDOT Standard
Specifications Item 260. The recommended application rate for Residential Urban streets is the
minimum required by the City of Fort Worth. The application rate for Collector/Arterial streets
equates to about 6 percent by weight based on a dry soil unit weight of 100 pcf. The results of
lime series tests performed on representative clay samples are attached (Figure 5). Lime
application rates provided herein are preliminary and the actual amount will be determined from
testing of bulk samples taken from the constructed pavement subgrade prior to placing steel and
concrete.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
5
We recommend lime stabilization procedures extend at least 1 ft beyond the edge of the
pavement to reduce effects of seasonal shrinking and swelling upon the extreme edges of
pavement. The soil-lime mixture should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor
maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and within the range of 0 to 4 percentage points above the
mixture's optimum moisture content. In all areas where hydrated lime is used to stabilize
subgrade soil, routine Atterberg-limit tests should be performed to verify the resulting plasticity
index of the soil-lime mixture is at/or below 15.
Mechanical lime stabilization of the pavement subgrade soil will not prevent normal seasonal
movement of the underlying untreated materials. Pavement and other flatwork constructed at
final grades as could experience soil-related potential seasonal movements of up to 7 inches
depending on the depth of limestone from final grade. Potential seasonal movements are
discussed in more detail in ALPHA Report No. W191259 performed for the residential
foundations to be constructed at the site.
Lime stabilization of the pavement subgrade is not required where the pavement subgrade
consists of limestone. In pavement areas where limestone is exposed after final subgrade
elevation is achieved, on-site lime stabilized clay cuttings, on-site processed limestone cuttings,
or flexible base material could be used as a leveling course (as needed) to provide a smooth
surface for placement of the pavement.
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests performed for this specific project indicate the CBR values
for the natural clay soil tested could be about 2.1 to 3.7 (Figure 4). Following improvement with
lime, the CBR value for the lime stabilized clayey soils is expected to be at least 10.
Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Section
Using the 1993 AASHTO pavement design procedures (WinPAS computer program distributed
by American Concrete Pavement Association), the following design parameters were used in
analyses of the PCC pavement section.
Compressive strength of concrete 3,600 psi at 28 days
Modulus of Elasticity 4,000,000 psi
Modulus of Rupture 620 psi
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction* 280 pci
Load Transfer Co-efficient 3.0
Drainage Coefficient 1.0
Initial PSI 4.5
Terminal PSI for 2.0 (Residential Urban)
2.25 (Collector)
2.5 (Arterial)
Standard Deviation 0.39
Reliability 85 percent
*Subgrade prepared with lime stabilization, or graded limestone as discussed in the previous
section.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
6
Using the Street Classification of “Residential-Urban” as described in the referenced Fort Worth
Pavement Design Manual, it is estimated annual traffic volume will be about 35,000 Equivalent
Single Axle Loads (ESALs) in one direction over a 25-year design life with 0.5 percent annual
traffic growth. Based on this, we estimate the cumulative ESALs over the design life of the
Residential Urban street pavement to be about 930,000. If the actual expected traffic volume is
different than used for our analysis herein, our office should be provided with the actual expected
traffic volume so that we can re-evaluate our recommendations.
Based on the referenced Traffic Impact Study prepared by Goodwin & Marshal and
conversations with Goodwin & Marshal, we understand expected traffic on Collector and
Arterial streets will be as summarized in the following list and in Table B.
Total Arterial Trips 12,500 (both directions)
Total Collector Trips 8,000 (both directions)
Lane Distribution 70%
Percent Truck Traffic Arterial 2%
Percent Truck Traffic Collector 1.5%
Growth Rate Arterial 2.5%
Growth Rate Collector 1.5%
Service life 30 years
Typical truck Loads 80 kips (one (1) front single axle at 20 kips and
two (2) rear tandem axles at 30 kips each)
Typical passenger vehicle loads Two (2) single axles at 2 kips each
TABLE B
Summary of Traffic and ESAL Distribution Between Residential Collector and Residential
Streets
Street Classification
Maximum Total
Trips in One
Direction
Passenger
Vehicle Trips Truck Trips
Total Equivalent
Single Axle Loads
(ESALs)
Arterial 4,375 4,288 88 3,733,233
Collector 2,800 2,772 28 1,470,649
Based on the subgrade preparations recommended herein, the projected traffic volume and stated
design parameters, a minimum 6-inch section of Portland cement concrete is required for
Residential Urban classified streets, a minimum 7-inch section of Portland cement concrete is
required for Collector classified streets and a minimum 9-inch section of Portland cement
concrete is required for Arterial classified streets at this project.
PCC should have a minimum 3,600 psi compressive strength at 28 days. The concrete section
should be placed over a properly prepared subgrade as discussed herein. Concrete should be
designed with 5 ± 1 percent entrained air. Reinforcing steel for concrete pavement should be in
accordance with Table 4.1 of the referenced Pavement Design Manual. Joints and saw-cutting in
concrete should be in accordance with Section Four of the referenced Pavement Design Manual.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
7
Drainage and Maintenance
Routine maintenance, including sealing of cracks and joints should be performed over the life of
the pavement. Adequate drainage should be provided to reduce seasonal variations in the
moisture content of subgrade soils. Maintaining positive surface drainage throughout the life
of the pavement is essential.
Soluble Sulfates
A total of 35 samples obtained from the borings were tested for soluble sulfate concentrations.
Results of the laboratory testing (TxDOT Test Method TEX-145-E Part II) are summarized in
Table B.
TABLE B
Soluble Sulfates
Sample
No.
Boring
No.
Depth,
ft Material Type Soluble Sulfate,
mg/Kg (ppm)
1 12 0-0.5 Brown Clay 62
2 15 0-2 Brown Clay 158
3 16 0-2 Brown Clay 56
4 18 0-2 Brown Clay 49
5 20 0-2 Brown Clay 75
6 21 0-2 Brown Clay 74
7 30 2-4 Brown Clay 105
8 39 0-2 Brown Clay 62
9 48 2-4 Brown Clay 54
10 59 4-6 Brown Clay 97
11 64 2-4 Dark Brown Clay 172
12 70 0-2 Dark Brown Clay 153
13 74 0-2 Brown Clay 64
14 78 2-4 Brown Clay 63
15 79 4-6 Light Brown Clay 174
16 89 2-4 Brown Clay 73
17 95 2-4 Dark Brown Clay 117
18 112 0-2 Dark Brown Clay 57
19 116 2-4 Dark Brown Clay 147
20 120 0-2 Dark Brown Clay 91
21 125 2-4 Dark Brown Clay 89
22 133 2-3 Brown Clay 98
23 135 0-2 Brown Clay 62
24 137 0-2 Brown Clay 161
25 147 2-4 Dark Brown Clay 137
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
8
TABLE B
Soluble Sulfates
Sample
No.
Boring
No.
Depth,
ft Material Type Soluble Sulfate,
mg/Kg (ppm)
26 148 2-4 Dark Brown Clay 79
27 158 0-2 Brown Clay 143
28 162 0-2 Brown Clay 78
29 167 0-1 Dark Brown Clay 86
30 169 0-2 Dark Brown Clay 80
31 180 2-4 Dark Brown Clay 36
32 182 2-4 Brown Clay 65
33 185 2-4 Brown Clay 61
34 191 0-2 Brown Clay 80
35 193 2-4 Brown Clay 70
Based on the results of laboratory testing, the soluble sulfate content measured in the samples
tested is considered relatively low (<3,000 ppm). It should be noted that concentrations of
soluble sulfates in soil are typically very localized and concentrations in other areas of the site
could vary significantly. Therefore, it is recommended sulfate sampling/t esting be performed
along the pavement subgrade during construction. During construction, experienced
geotechnical personnel should make close observations for possible sulfate reactions.
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Variations in subsurface conditions could be encountered during construction. To permit
correlation between test boring data and actual subsurface conditions encountered during
construction, it is recommended a registered Professional Engineering firm be retained to
observe construction procedures and materials.
Some construction problems, particularly degree or magnitude, cannot be reasonably anticipated
until the course of construction. The recommendations offered in the following paragraphs are
intended not to limit or preclude other conceivable solutions, but rather to provide our
observations based on our experience and understanding of the project characteristics and
subsurface conditions encountered in the borings.
Site Preparation and Grading
Limestone was encountered at the ground surface and within 4 ft of the ground surface in several
of the borings. We expect limestone will be encountered during grading and general excavation
at this site. From our experience, this limestone can be hard and difficult to excavate. Rock
excavation methods (including, but not limited to rock teeth, rippers, jack hammers, or
sawcutting) may be required to remove the limestone. Crushing equipment may be required to
process this limestone if it is desired to use this material as compacted fill on the site. The
contractor selected should have experience with excavation in hard limestone.
All areas supporting pavement or areas to receive new fill should be properly prepared.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
9
After completion of the necessary stripping, clearing, and excavating and prior to placing any
required fill, the exposed subgrade should be carefully evaluated by probing and testing. Any
undesirable material (organic material, wet, soft, or loose soil) still in place should be removed.
The exposed subgrade should be further evaluated by proof-rolling with a heavy pneumatic tired
roller, loaded dump truck or similar equipment weighing approximately 25 tons to check for
pockets of soft or loose material hidden beneath a thin crust of possibly better soil . Proof-rolling
procedures should be observed routinely by a Professional Engineer or his designated
representative. Any undesirable material (organic material, wet, soft, or loose soil) exposed from
the proof-roll should be removed and replaced with well-compacted material as outlined in the
Fill Compaction section.
Prior to placement of any fill, the exposed subgrade should then be scarified to a minimum depth
of 6 inches and recompacted as outlined in the Fill Compaction section.
If fill is to be placed on existing slopes (natural or constructed) steeper than six horizontal to one
vertical (6:1), the fill materials should be benched into the existing slopes in such a manner as to
provide a minimum bench width of five (5) ft. This should provide a good contact between the
existing soils and new fill materials, reduce potential sliding planes, and allow relatively
horizontal lift placements.
Even if fill is properly compacted as recommended in the Fill Compaction section, fills in excess
of about 10 ft are still subject to settlements over time of up to about 1 to 2 percent of the total
fill thickness. This should be considered when planning or placing deep fills, especially where
utilities are planned below pavement.
Slope stability analysis of embankments (natural or constructed) and global stability analysis for
retaining walls was not within the scope of this study.
The contractor is responsible for designing any excavation slopes, temporary sheeting or shoring.
Design of these structures should include any imposed surface surcharges. Construction site
safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor, who shall also be solely responsible for the
means, methods and sequencing of construction operations. The contractor should also be aware
that slope height, slope inclination or excavation depths (including utility trench excavations)
should in no case exceed those specified in local, state and/or federal safety regulations, such as
OSHA Health and Safety Standard for Excavations, 29 CFR Part 1926, or successor regulations.
Stockpiles should be place well away from the edge of the excavation and their heights should be
controlled so they do not surcharge the sides of the excavation. Surface drainage should be
carefully controlled to prevent flow of water over the slopes and/or into the excavations.
Construction slopes should be closely observed for signs of mass movement, including tension
cracks near the crest or bulging at the toe. If potential stability problems are observed, a
geotechnical engineer should be contacted immediately. Shoring, bracing or underpinning
required for the project (if any) should be designed by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Texas.
Due to the nature of the clay soils found near the surface at most of the borings, traffic of heavy
equipment (including heavy compaction equipment) may create pumping and general
deterioration of shallow soils. Therefore, some construction difficulties should be anticipated
during periods when these soils are saturated.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
10
Fill Compaction
The following compaction recommendations pertain to general filling and site grading. The
pavement subgrade should be prepared as discussed in the Pavement Subgrade Preparation
section.
Processed limestone or other rock-like materials used as fill should be compacted to at least 95
percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density. The compacted moisture content of limestone
or other rock-like materials used as fill is not considered crucial to proper performance.
However, if the material's moisture content during placement is within 3 percentage points of
optimum, the compactive effort required to achieve the minimum compaction criteria may be
minimized. In general, processed limestone used as fill should have a maximum particle size of
6 inches. However, any processed limestone used as fill within 3 ft of the final pavement
subgrade elevation should have a maximum particle size of 3 inches. A gradation of at least 40
percent passing a standard No. 4 sieve is recommended.
Clay and shaly clay with a plasticity index equal to or greater than 25 should be compacted to a
dry density between 95 and 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM
D 698). The compacted moisture content of the clays during placement should be within the
range of 2 to 5 percentage points above optimum.
Clay with a plasticity index less than 25 should be compacted to a dry density of at least 95
percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and within the range of 1
percentage point below to 3 percentage points above the material's optimum moisture content.
Clayey soils used as fill should be processed and the largest particle or clod should be less than 6
inches prior to compaction.
In cases where mass fills are more than 10 ft deep, the fill/backfill below 10 ft should be
compacted to at least 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-698) and
within 2 percentage points of the material's optimum moisture content. The portion of the
fill/backfill shallower than 10 ft should be compacted as outlined herein.
Compaction should be accomplished by placing fill in about 8-inch thick loose lifts and
compacting each lift to at least the specified minimum dry density. Field density and moisture
content tests should be performed on each lift.
In general site grading areas where final fill slopes will be four horizontal to one vertical (4:1) or
steeper and greater than 5 ft in height, field density and moisture content tests should be
performed on each lift.
Utilities
In cases where utility lines are more than 10 ft deep, the fill/backfill below 10 ft should be
compacted to at least 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698) and
within –2 to +2 percentage points of the material's optimum moisture content. The portion of the
fill/backfill shallower than 10 ft should be compacted as previously outlined. Density tests
should be performed on each lift (maximum 12-inch thick) and should be performed as the
trench is being backfilled.
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
11
Even if fill is properly compacted, fills in excess of about 10 ft are still subject to settlements over
time of up to about 1 to 2 percent of the total fill thickness. This should be considered when
designing utility lines under pavements and/or other areas with deep fill.
If utility trenches or other excavations extend to or beyond a depth of 5 ft below construction
grade, the contractor or others shall be required to develop an excavation safety plan to protect
personnel entering the excavation or excavation vicinity. The collection of specific geotechnical
data and the development of such a plan, which could include designs for sloping and benching
or various types of temporary shoring, is beyond the scope of this study. Any such designs and
safety plans shall be developed in accordance with current OSHA guidelines and other
applicable industry standards.
Groundwater
Groundwater was encountered in several borings at depths of about 6 ft to 20 ft below the ground
surface. Shallower groundwater seepage could be encountered from the subsurface stratigraphy
in excavations for pavement, utilities and other general excavations at this site. The risk of
seepage increases with depth of excavation and during or after periods of precipitation. Standard
sump pits and pumping may be adequate to control seepage on a local basis.
In any areas where cuts are made, attention should be given to possible seasonal water seepage
that could occur through natural cracks and fissures in the newly exposed stratigraphy. The risk
of seepage is increased where limestone is exposed in excavations and slopes or is near final
grade. In these areas subsurface drains may be required to intercept seasonal groundwater
seepage. The need for these or other dewatering devices should be carefully addressed during
construction. Our office could be contacted to visually observe final grades to evaluate the need
for such drains.
LIMITATIONS
Professional services provided in this geotechnical exploration were performed, findings
obtained, and recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices. The scope of services provided herein does not include an
environmental assessment of the site or investigation for the presence or absence of hazardous
materials in the soil, surface water or groundwater. ALPHA, upon written request, can be
retained to provide same.
ALPHA TESTING, INC. is not responsible for conclusions, opinions or recommendations
made by others based on this data. Information contained in this report is intended for the
exclusive use of the Client (and their designated design representatives), and is related solely to
design of the specific structures outlined on the cover page of this report. No party other than the
Client (and their designated design representatives) shall use or rely upon this report in any
manner whatsoever unless such party shall have obtained ALPHA’s written acceptance of such
intended use. Any such third party using this report after obtaining ALPHA’s written acceptance
shall be bound by the limitations and limitations of liability contained herein, including
ALPHA’s liability being limited to the fee paid to it for this report. Recommendations presented
in this report should not be used for design of any other structures except those specifically
described in this report. In all areas of this report in which ALPHA may provide additional
services if requested to do so in writing, it is presumed that such requests have not been made if
ALHA Report No. W191259-A-Rev1
12
not evidenced by a written document accepted by ALPHA. Further, subsurface conditions can
change with passage of time. Recommendations contained herein are not considered applicable
for an extended period of time after the completion date of this report. It is recommended our
office be contacted for a review of the contents of this report for construction commencing more
than one (1) year after completion of this report. Non-compliance with any of these
requirements by the Client or anyone else shall release ALPHA from any liability resulting from
the use of, or reliance upon, this report.
Recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of information
provided by the Client about characteristics of the project. If the Client notes any deviation from
the facts about project characteristics, our office should be contacted immediately since this may
materially alter the recommendations. Further, ALPHA TESTING, INC. is not responsible for
damages resulting from workmanship of designers or contractors and it is recommended the
Owner retain qualified personnel, such as a Geotechnical Engineering firm, to verify
construction is performed in accordance with plans and specifications.
CLOSURE
All recommendations in the referenced geotechnical report remain unchanged unless specifically
modified herein. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Please contact us with any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
ALPHA TESTING, INC.
October 14, 2019
Mark L. McKay, P.E. Brian J. Hoyt, P.E.
Director of Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical Department Manager
BJH/MLM/klf
Copies: (1-PDF) Client
Attachments: Overall Site Location Plan – Figure 1
Boring Location Plan – Figure 2
Moisture - Density Relationship – Figure 3
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) – Figure 4
Mechanical Lime Series – Figure 5
WinPAS Analysis Results
Log of Borings (Borings 1 through 140, 143 through 194 and 219 through 224)
Key to Soil Symbols and Classifications
OVERALL SITE LOCATION PLANFINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND SOUTHERN PHASE OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROADFORT WORTH, TEXASALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1FIGURE 1FIGURE 2AFIGURE 2BFIGURE 2CFIGURE 2DFIGURE 2EFIGURE 2FFIGURE 2GFIGURE 2HSAM REYNOLDS ROADFIGURE 2AFIGURE 2BFIGURE 2CFIGURE 2DFIGURE 2EFIGURE 2FFIGURE 2GFIGURE 2HSAM REYNOLDS ROADN
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND
SOUTHERN PHASE
OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1
BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2A
SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
B-30
B-27
P-9
B-19
B-20
B-29B-28
B-26
B-18B-17
B-31
B-1 B-3
B-2
B-6 B-7 B-8
B-10
B-11
B-15
B-16
B-33
B-41 B-43B-42 B-44
B-45
B-46
B-47
B-32
B-40
B-4
B-9
B-5
N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY
BORING LOCATION (W183152)
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND
SOUTHERN PHASE
OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1
BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2B
SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
B-22 B-23 B-24 B-25
B-21 P-5
P-4
B-3
B-2
B-4
B-6 B-7
B-8
B-10
B-11 B-12 B-13 B-14
B-33
B-51 B-53B-52B-46
B-47 B-48 B-49 B-50
B-32
B-34 B-35 B-36 B-37
B-38
B-39
B-20
B-19
N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY
BORING LOCATION (W183152)
BORING LOCATION PLANFINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND SOUTHERN PHASE OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROADFORT WORTH, TEXASALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1FIGURE 2CP-11SAM REYNOLDS ROADB-101B-102B-91B-93B-92B-99B-100B-85B-86B-87B-88B-89B-90B-71B-73B-72B-74B-75B-76B-77B-78B-79B-61B-59B-60B-54B-55B-56B-57B-58B-41B-47B-40B-46B-62NAPPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONAPPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY BORING LOCATION (W183152)
BORING LOCATION PLANFINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND SOUTHERN PHASE OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROADFORT WORTH, TEXASALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1FIGURE 2DB-48B-53B-51P-12B-70B-68B-67B-65B-64B-62B-63B-61B-80B-79B-77B-84B-82B-81B-98B-97B-92B-106B-105B-104B-102B-103B-101SAM REYNOLDS ROADB-49B-50B-52B-46B-47B-66B-69B-78B-83B-93B-94B-95B-96P-13B-116B-48B-53B-51P-12B-70B-68B-67B-65B-64B-62B-63B-61B-80B-79B-77B-84B-82B-81B-98B-97B-92B-106B-105B-104B-102B-103B-101SAM REYNOLDS ROADB-49B-50B-52B-46B-47B-66B-69B-78B-83B-93B-94B-95B-96P-13B-116NAPPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONAPPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY BORING LOCATION (W183152)
BORING LOCATION PLANFINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND SOUTHERN PHASE OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROADFORT WORTH, TEXASALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1FIGURE 2ESAM REYNOLDS ROADB-121B-123B-122B-124B-125B-126B-127B-128B-139B-111B-113B-112B-114B-115B-116B-135B-136B-140B-101B-103B-102B-104B-105B-106B-133B-134B-137B-138B-93B-92B-94B-95B-96P-16P-17P-13NAPPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONAPPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY BORING LOCATION (W183152)
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND SOUTHERN PHASE
OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1
BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2F
B-158B-157B-156B-155B-154
B-153
B-152 B-151B-150B-149 B-148
B-147 B-146 B-144 B-145 B-143
P-7
B-159
B-160 B-163
B-168 B-170 B-171
B-167
B-166
B-165B-164B-162B-161
P-6
B-169
SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY
BORING LOCATION (W183152)
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND
SOUTHERN PHASE
OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1
BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2G
SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
P-14
B-53
B-70
B-84
B-98
B-182
B-181B-180B-179B-178B-177
B-176
B-174 B-175
B-192
B-191B-188
B-184
B-187
B-183
B-194B-193
B-190
B-186
B-189
B-185
B-173B-172B-39
N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY
BORING LOCATION (W183152)
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND
SOUTHERN PHASE
OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1
BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2H
SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
P-1
B-121
B-131 B-132 B-133
B-129
B-130
B-111
B-117 B-118 B-119 B-120
B-107 B-108 B-109 B-110
B-89
B-102B-101B-100
B-99
B-90
P-15
N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE PRELIMINARY
BORING LOCATION (W183152)
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
TRADITION, CENTRAL, AND
SOUTHERN PHASE
OFF SAM REYNOLDS ROAD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ALPHA PROJECT NO. W191259-A-REV1
BORING LOCATION PLAN
FIGURE 2I
B-223
B-221
B-220
B-219
B-222
B-224
SAM REYNOLDS ROAD N
APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION
Optimum Moistuire Content (%):
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP RESULTS
(ASTM D698-A)
Classification:CH
Project No:
Material Description:Brown Sandy Clay
LL:59
PI : 35
23.8 % Passing #200:65.0%
Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf):91.5
Boring 2
W191259-A-REV1 Date:08/30/19
PL:
FIGURE 3A
24Sample Location:
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%Dry Unit Weight, (pcf)Moisture Content, (%)
Optimum Moistuire Content (%):
Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf):100.8 PI : 31
20.5 % Passing #200:85.9%
FIGURE 3B
Project No:
Sample Location:Boring 77 PL:
Brown Clay
Classification:CL LL:48
17
REPORT OF MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP RESULTS
(ASTM D698-A)
W191259-A-REV1 Date:09/06/19
Material Description:
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%Dry Unit Weight, (pcf)Moisture Content, (%)
Optimum Moistuire Content (%):
Boring 135Sample Location:
24.1
PL:
% Passing #200:86.4%
Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf):94.1 PI : 42
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP RESULTS
(ASTM D698-A)
FIGURE 3C
20
Classification:CH LL:62
Project No: W191259-A-REV1 Date:09/06/19
Material Description:Dark Brown Clay
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%Dry Unit Weight, (pcf)Moisture Content, (%)
Optimum Moistuire Content (%):
Date:08/30/19
Material Description:Dark Brown Clay with Sand
Project No: W191259-A--REV1
LL:65
27.0
Classification:CH
% Passing #200:70.5%
Maximum Dry Unit Weight (pcf):92.7
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP RESULTS
(ASTM D698-A)
PL:
FIGURE 3D
22Boring 147Sample Location:
PI : 43
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%Dry Unit Weight, (pcf)Moisture Content, (%)
CBR @ 0.20 Inches = 2.7%
FIGURE 4A
Sample Location:Boring 2
CBR @ 0.10 Inches = 3.2%
Material Description:Brown Sandy Clay
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RESULTS
(ASTM D1883)
Project No: W191259-A-REV1 Date:08/30/19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Stress, psiPenetration, in
Material Description:Brown Clay
Sample Location:Boring 77
CBR @ 0.20 Inches = 2.1%
FIGURE 4B
CBR @ 0.10 Inches = 2.3%
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RESULTS
(ASTM D1883)
Project No: W191259-A-REV1 Date:09/06/19
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Stress, psiPenetration, in
CBR @ 0.20 Inches = 2.9%
FIGURE 4C
Sample Location:Boring 135
CBR @ 0.10 Inches = 3.7%
Material Description:Dark Brown Clay
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RESULTS
(ASTM D1883)
Project No: W191259-A-REV1 Date:09/06/19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Stress, psiPenetration, in
CBR @ 0.20 Inches = 2.6%
FIGURE 4D
Sample Location:Boring 147
CBR @ 0.10 Inches = 2.5%
Material Description:Dark Brown Clay with Sand
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO RESULTS
(ASTM D1883)
Project No: W191259-A-REV1 Date:08/30/19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Stress, psiPenetration, in
39
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF MECHANICAL LIME SERIES RESULTS
Project No: W191259-A-REV1
Borings: 15, 45, 64, 67
PI 11
FIGURE 5A
23 18 14
8%6%4%
Date:09/27/19
% Lime 0%2%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%10%11%12%13%14%15%PIPercent Dry Weight of Lime
39
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF MECHANICAL LIME SERIES RESULTS
Project No: W191259-A-REV1
Borings: 83, 120, 130, 137
PI 9
FIGURE 5B
14
8%6%4%
Date:09/27/19
% Lime 0%2%
1219
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%10%11%12%13%14%15%PIPercent Dry Weight of Lime
Date:
PI 81142
8%
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
REPORT OF MECHANICAL LIME SERIES RESULTS
Project No: W191259-A-REV1
Borings: 219-224
6%4%
09/19/19
% Lime 0%2%
FIGURE 5C
21 16
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%10%11%12%13%14%15%PIPercent Dry Weight of Lime
% Lime 0%2%4%
Geotechnical ● Construction Materials ● Environmental ● TBPE Firm No. 813
6%8%
Date:09/19/19
REPORT OF MECHANICAL LIME SERIES RESULTS
FIGURE 5D
17 12 10
Project No: W191259-A-REV1
Borings: 146, 158, 169, 180 and 190
PI 40 22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%10%11%12%13%14%15%PIPercent Dry Weight of Lime
WinPAS
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Rigid Design Inputs
Agency:
Company:
Contractor:
Project Description:
Location:
City of Fort Worth
Alpha Testing Inc.
Residential Pavement Analysis
Fort Worth, TX
Rigid Pavement Design/Evaluation
PCC Thickness
Design ESALs
Reliability
Overall Deviation
Modulus of Rupture
Modulus of Elasticity
5.91
930,000
85.00
0.39
620
4,000,000
inches
psi
psi
percent
Load Transfer, J
Mod. Subgrade Reaction, k
Drainage Coefficient, Cd
Initial Serviceability
Terminal Serviceability
3.00
280
1.00
4.50
2.00
psi/in
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k-value) Determination
Resilient Modulus of the Subgrade
Resilient Modulus of the Subbase
Subbase Thickness
Depth to Rigid Foundation
Loss of Support Value (0,1,2,3)
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
psi
psi
inches
feet
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 280.00 psi/in
Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:12:04PM
Engineer:
WinPAS
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Rigid Design Inputs
Collector Pavement Analysis
Fort Worth, Texas
City of Fort Worth
Rigid Pavement Design/Evaluation
Concrete Thickness
Total Rigid ESALs
Reliability
Overall Standard Deviation
Flexural Strength
Modulus of Elasticity
6.57
1,470,649
85.00
0.39
620
4,000,000
inches
psi
psi
percent
Load Transfer Coefficient
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Drainage Coefficient
Initial Serviceability
Terminal Serviceability
3.00
280
1.00
4.50
2.25
psi/in.
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k-value) Determination
Resilient Modulus of the Subgrade
Unadjusted Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Depth to Rigid Foundation
Loss of Support Value (0,1,2,3)
0.0
0.00
0.0
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Project Name:
Route:
Location:
Owner/Agency:
Design Engineer:
0
280 psi/in.
Friday, October 11, 2019 3:47:55PM Engineer:Alpha Testing, Inc.
WinPAS
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Rigid Design Inputs
Arterial Pavement Analysis
Fort Worth, Texas
City of Fort Worth
Rigid Pavement Design/Evaluation
Concrete Thickness
Total Rigid ESALs
Reliability
Overall Standard Deviation
Flexural Strength
Modulus of Elasticity
7.98
3,733,233
85.00
0.39
620
4,000,000
inches
psi
psi
percent
Load Transfer Coefficient
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Drainage Coefficient
Initial Serviceability
Terminal Serviceability
3.00
280
1.00
4.50
2.50
psi/in.
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k-value) Determination
Resilient Modulus of the Subgrade
Unadjusted Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Depth to Rigid Foundation
Loss of Support Value (0,1,2,3)
0.0
0.00
0.0
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Project Name:
Route:
Location:
Owner/Agency:
Design Engineer:
0
280 psi/in.
Friday, October 11, 2019 3:44:59PM Engineer:Alpha Testing, Inc.
WinPAS 12
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Traffic Input by Day
Annual Growth Rate 1.50 percent
Design Life 30 years
Terminal Serviceability 2.3 Directional Distribution 0.00 percent
Estimated Structural Number 1.0 Design Lane Distribution 0.00 percent
Estimated Rigid Thickness 7.00 inches Design Lane
Traffic Factor Traffic Input by
City of Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas
Collector Pavement Analysis
ESAL Data by Vehicle Type
Vehicle Axle Load Axle Type Number
2.00 Single
2.00
0.00
Single
Single 2,772
0.00
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
Single 0
0.00
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
Single 0
NumberAxle TypeAxle LoadVehicle
0.00 Single
0
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
0.00
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
Single 0
20.00
30.00
30.00
Single
Tandem
Tandem
0.00
0.00
Single
Single 28
Total Rigid ESALs Total Flexible ESALs 1,470,649 1,107,127
Project Name:
Route:
Location:
Owner/Agency:
Design Engineer:
Friday, October 11, 2019 3:47:32PM Engineer:Alpha Testing, Inc.
WinPAS 12
Pavement Thickness Design According to
1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavements Structures
American Concrete Pavement Association
Traffic Input by Day
Annual Growth Rate 0.00 percent
Design Life 30 years
Terminal Serviceability 2.5 Directional Distribution 0.00 percent
Estimated Structural Number 1.0 Design Lane Distribution 0.00 percent
Estimated Rigid Thickness 9.50 inches Design Lane
Traffic Factor Traffic Input by
City of Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas
Arterial Pavement Analysis
ESAL Data by Vehicle Type
Vehicle Axle Load Axle Type Number
2.00 Single
2.00
0.00
Single
Single 4,288
0.00
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
Single 0
0.00
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
Single 0
NumberAxle TypeAxle LoadVehicle
0.00 Single
0
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
0.00
0.00
0.00
Single
Single
Single 0
20.00
30.00
30.00
Single
Tandem
Tandem
0.00
0.00
Single
Single 88
Total Rigid ESALs Total Flexible ESALs 3,733,233 2,763,918
Project Name:
Route:
Location:
Owner/Agency:
Design Engineer:
Friday, October 11, 2019 3:46:03PM Engineer:Alpha Testing, Inc.
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
1
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24 67 22 45
100/1.5"
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
2
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+16 51 21 30
100/0.75"
100/1.25"
100/1.75"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/15/2019 7/15/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
3
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
15
100/1.25
100/3
100/1
100/2.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/15/2019 7/15/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
4
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
11 41 20 21
100/1.75
100/2.25
100/1
100/1.25
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
5
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 29 72 24 48
100/3.25"
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
6
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19 59 20 39
100/0.75"
100/1.5"
100/1.5"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
7
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+11 38 21 17
100/0.5
100/1.5
100/0.75
100/1.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/15/2019 7/15/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
8
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
13
100/0.25
100/0.75
100/2.25
100/1.25
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
9
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
10.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 263.2 93
4.25 16 51 18 33 0.0
13
12
4.5+15 53 19 34
4.5+21
100/2.75"
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
10
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.25 23 67 23 44
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/8/2019 7/8/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
11
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21 0.5
4.0 10 29 15 14
14
12
100/0.25
100/2.25
100/1.25
100/1
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/11/2019 7/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
12
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments 0.5
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/0.5
100/0.25
100/0.75
100/2
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/11/2019 7/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
13
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/0
100/0.75
100/1
100/0.75
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
14
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15 58 20 38
100/3.25
100/2.5
100/1.5
100/1.25
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
15
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.25 29
2.5 28 78 26 52
2.5 29
11 80 28 52 1.1
100/1.25"
100/0.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
16
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
3.0 24 69 20 49 1.7
4.5+15
4.5+39
4.5+30
4.5+18
100/4.75
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
17
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
15.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
2.25 281.2 95
3.0 26
4.0 16 43 20 23 0.0
4.0 18
4.5+18
-11100/2.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/16/2019 7/16/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
18
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous nodules
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.5 28
3.5 26
3.25 221.2 112
4.5+11 26 16 10 0.4
4.5+20
4.5+20
100/2.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/16/2019 7/16/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
19
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY with caclareous deposits
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 27
2.25 33 77 26 51 0.3
3.5 27
100/8
100/4.75
100/3
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/8/2019 7/8/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
20
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan CLAY with caclareous nodules
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.5 35
4.5+23
3.25 18 38 18 20 0.0
-12
-15
4.5+163.9 123
100/3.5
100/2
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/8/2019 7/8/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
21
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray SHALE
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24 65 23 42 0.7
16
18
100/2.75
100/0.75
100/1.5
100/3.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/11/2019 7/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
22
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15 55 19 36 1.9
100/0
100/0.5
100/1
100/1
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/11/2019 7/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
23
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+10 33 16 17
100/0.25
100/0.5
100/1.75
100/1.25
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
24
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15 69 24 45
13
100/0.75
100/1.5
100/0.75
100/1.75
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
25
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20 62 24 38
100/2.25"
100/2"
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
26
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+16
4.5+179.3 108
4.5+20 82 27 55
100/2"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
27
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
3.5 25 71 22 49 0.7
3.0 24
4.0 19
3.0 13
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
28
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
16.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
3.25 29 76 25 51
3.5 21
3.25 20
4.5+18
4.5+16
100/2.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
29
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
17.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
2.75 27 69 22 47 0.1
3.0 25
4.0 17
4.0 23
4.5+19
100/2.75
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
30
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
-
13
17
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
1.25 27
2.25 26
3.5 19 49 15 34 0.0
4.5+15
4.5+14
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/25/2019 7/25/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
31
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 25
2.75 28 66 21 45 0.0
2.5 251.3 98
4.0 19
4.5+16
3.5 19
100/3.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/3/2019 7/3/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
32
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
11.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.0 34 71 25 46 0.0
3.75 30
3.25 17
11
11
4.5+22
4.5+13
100/1.75
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/26/2019 9/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
33
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/7.5"
100/3"
100/2"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/8/2019 7/8/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
34
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+281.6 96
4.0 17
4.5+14 30 15 15 0.0
16
100/2.75
100/2.5
100/4.5
100/4
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/9/2019 7/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
35
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Tan CLAY
7.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray SHALE
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+25
4.5+19
4.5+17 48 19 29 0.0
4.5+17
15
100/3.25
100/2.5
100/4
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/9/2019 7/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
36
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments 0.5
Tan LIMESTONE
6.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18 63 22 41
4.5 19 40 18 22
100/1
100/4.75
100/3.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
37
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13 56 22 34
100/3.5
100/4.5
100/1.25
100/0.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
38
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/1.5"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
39
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
18.0
Tan WEATHERED LIMESTONE
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+27
4.25 262.0 95
3.25 28 85 26 59 0.4
3.25 28
3.0 30 71 23 48
3.5 20
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
40
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+19 76 25 51 7.1
100/2"
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
41
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.5+13
4.5+11 66 20 46
4.0 16
4.5+15
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
42
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY - FILL
2.0
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+11 51 16 35
2.5 26
2.5 26 59 18 41 0.0
3.0 221.6 108
4.5+20
4.5+15
100/4
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
43
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
15.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+11
3.25 27 68 23 45 0.1
3.5 24
3.5 20
4.5+22
12
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
44
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
3.0 23
4.5+21 65 23 42 0.0
3.75 23
4.25 18
4.5+16
11100/2
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
45
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
17.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 17
3.5 25
4.0 21 66 20 46 0.3
4.5+18
4.25 18
4.0 15
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/3/2019 7/3/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
46
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
8.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
18.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.0 33
2.75 28
3.5 22
3.25 19 54 19 35
3.25 17
4.0 14
4.5 15 41 21 20 0.0
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
47
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 26
3.75 261.7 96
4.0 23 66 22 44 0.3
4.5 16 51 19 32
4.5+15
15
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/8/2019 7/8/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
48
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
6
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.75 26
3.0 24
3.5 24
3.0 25
3.0 20
4.5+16 38 19 19 0.1
3.75 183.8 116
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/9/2019 7/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
49
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
13.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 28 73 26 47
3.25 25 62 22 40
1.75 21
4.0 15
4.5+15
4.5+17 61 24 37 0.0
3.75 21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/9/2019 7/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
50
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
11.0
Tan SHALY CLAY
18.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24
4.25 18 37 18 19
4.5+9
4.25 26
4.25 17 44 22 22 0.0
100/3.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
51
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13 56 21 35
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
100/2.25"
100/2.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
52
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
6.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
18.0
Tan WEATHERED LIMESTONE
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+21 75 25 50 2.9
4.5+19
4.5+19 44 22 22
4.5+13
4.5+16
100/3"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
53
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Light Brown CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
3.25 28 81 25 56
2.75 28
4.5+18 63 20 43
4.25 20
3.5 21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
54
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+19 77 25 52
100/3"
100/2.75"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/9/2019 9/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
55
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+12
4.5+20 67 21 46 4.8
3.75 231.6 104
4.25 17
4.5+15
100/2.25"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
56
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+12
4.0 24 67 20 47
4.5+22 76 25 51
4.5+19
3.0 20
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
57
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
16
15
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
15.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 14
4.0 24
4.5 25
3.5 21 56 18 38 0.0
3.5 20 42 21 21
3.0 18100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
58
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+10
3.5 24 72 21 51 0.3
4.5+16 55 18 37
4.5+15
4.5+15
4.5+16
4.5+18
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/25/2019 7/25/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
59
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
15.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATE AT 20 FT
4.5+16
2.0 281.1 96
2.5 28
4.5+13 45 17 28 0.0
4.5+14
4.0 13
100/4"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
60
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 24
3.5 24 64 20 44
4.5 16 59 20 39 0.1
4.5 19
4.5 14
4.0 16
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
61
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 29
3.5 26
4.5 16 71 22 49
4.5 17
4.5 16
4.5 13 33 15 18
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
62
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
19.5
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
17.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+25
4.5+203.8 103
4.5+16 52 18 34 0.1
4.5+17
4.5+15
4.5+13
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/8/2019 7/8/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
63
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
10
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Reddish Tan CLAY with calcareous nodules
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24
3.0 29 69 22 47 0.1
2.5 29
2.5 25
4.5+15
100/6"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
64
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.5+19
3.75 26 78 26 52 0.9
3.5 20
3.5 17
100/1.5"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/9/2019 7/9/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
65
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
11
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous nodules
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.75 25 69 22 47
2.5 26
2.75 26
3.25 19
3.5 18
100/2.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
66
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
12.0
Tan CLAY
17.0
Light Brown CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
4.5+243.9 101
4.25 23
4.25 16 49 19 30
4.5+16
4.5+10 35 17 18
4.5+10
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
67
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+14
4.5+15 58 19 39
3.6100/3"
100/2.25"
100/1"
100/2.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
68
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
4.5+8 41 19 22 1.1
4.5+14
-10
4.25 15 52 19 33
4.5 16
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
69
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
17.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
4.5+19
4.5+20 66 22 44 2.9
4.25 17
4.5 18
4.5+18
100/3"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
70
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23
3.75 251.5 95
4.25 23
4.25 23 61 21 40 0.3
4.5 20
2.75 17
4.5+17
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
71
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+23 68 21 47
100/2.25"
100/2"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
72
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Light Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
3.25 25
4.5+16 33 15 18
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
73
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.25 18 59 18 41
4.5 16
2.0 17
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
74
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+12
2.75 261.5 96
3.5 27 76 24 52 0.0
3.5 19
100/4.25
100/4.5
100/1.5
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
75
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
15
17
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
15.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
3.25 26 73 23 50 0.0
3.25 24
4.5+16
4.25 17
2.25 24
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
76
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.75 28
2.75 24
3.5 22 56 18 38
4.5+16
3.25 17
100/2.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
77
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
13
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.25 25
3.75 24 64 20 44 0.3
3.0 261.7 98
2.5 16
-13
-19
-20
100/5"
100/1.25"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/3/2019 7/3/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
78
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
8
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Reddish Tan CLAY with calcareous nodules
10.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
1.75 28
2.75 26
3.0 26
2.0 25
4.25 14 35 16 19 0.0
4.5+10 0.0
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
79
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
19.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+17 57 18 39 1.5
4.5+16
4.5+12
2.5 13
-15100/2.25"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
80
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
13
10
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 26
4.0 24 72 21 51 0.0
4.5 14
100/5.25"
100/4.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
81
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
10
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+25
4.5 23
4.0 25
4.0 21 74 23 51
100/4.5"
100/4.25"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
82
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+10 33 13 20 1.1
4.5+9
3.75 17
4.5+11
4.0 20 40 19 21
3.5 19
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
83
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.25 23
4.0 21 61 20 41 0.5
4.0 17
3.25 18
4.5+15
4.5+21
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
84
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.25 27
3.25 26 74 21 53
2.75 26
3.5 23
4.5+18 50 20 30
4.25 14
100/3.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
85
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Light Brown CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+12
2.25 28
2.5 27 69 19 50 0.0
4.0 24
3.0 21
100/2.25
100/1.25
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
86
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+20
3.5 23
3.5 20 54 18 36 0.0
2.0 35
100/3"
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/18/2019 7/18/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
87
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
9
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+6
4.5+20 64 21 43 0.0
4.5 25
3.75 22
1.75 25
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
88
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+109.7 118
4.5+21 69 23 46 3.6
2.75 33
100/3.25
100/1.5
100/1.25
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
89
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17
2.5 26
3.75 26 66 19 47
3.5 23
100/2.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/17/2019 7/17/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
90
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.0 16 63 20 43 1.3
4.0 25
2.0 28
100/2.75
100/1
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
7/18/2019 7/18/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
91
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+11
3.25 25 62 21 41
4.0 13
100/5.5"
100/1.5"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
92
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY with calcareous deposits
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 15
4.5 19 65 20 45
4.5 21
4.5 16 40 20 20 0.0
4.5 19
100/0.5"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
93
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 21
4.5 18
4.5 8 74 23 51
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
94
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 22 24 12 12
4.5 141.9 111
4.5 15 42 19 23
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
95
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 19
3.5 23
4.5 23 69 22 47 0.1
4.5 12
4.5 13
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
96
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 22
4.5 20 67 21 46 0.1
100/5.5"
100/1.75"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
97
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.5 15 62 19 43
4.5 13
3.5 22
100/2"
100/0.75"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
98
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan CLAY
15.0
Tan and Gray CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 25
2.75 32
3.25 28 59 19 40 0.3
4.5 211.8 103
4.5 19
3.0 27
3.5 19
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
99
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
9.0
- with limestone fragments at 8 ft
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 27
2.25 26
2.25 39 74 25 49
13
100/0.25"
100/0.25"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
100
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 25
3.25 26 65 20 45 0.7
3.5 252.8 108
4.5+20
100/5.25"
100/0.25"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
101
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 25
3.25 27
18 79 26 53
18
100/0.75"
100/2"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
102
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 18 59 19 40
4.5 20
100/5.75"
100/1.25"
100/0.75"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
103
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 27 69 23 46
4.5 13
100/5.25"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
104
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 21
4.0 21 68 24 44
4.5 19 63 20 43 0.4
4.5 16
4.5 17
100/0.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
105
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 26
4.0 26 81 27 54
100/5.5"
100/1.75"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
106
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 27
4.0 24 73 24 49 0.3
100/2.75"
100/1.75"
100/1"
100/0.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
107
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
11.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 25 59 21 38
100/0.25"
100/2.25"
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
108
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Light Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.25 24
4.5 10 71 20 51
100/1.5"
100/2"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
109
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
2.25 27
1.75 21 81 26 55
100/0.25"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
110
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.0 29
3.0 29 75 26 49
2.75 29
100/0.25"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/13/2019 9/13/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
111
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5 17
4.5 15 78 27 51
100/4.75"
100/1"
100/0.75"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/30/2019 8/30/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
112
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 27
4.0 20 70 22 48 0.3
100/4.75"
100/0.25"
100/0.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/30/2019 8/30/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
113
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 25
2.75 27 65 21 44 0.0
2.5 29
3.0 261.7 98
100/2.5"
100/0.5"
100/0.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/30/2019 8/30/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
114
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
9.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 28
2.75 30 76 24 52 0.8
3.0 29
4.5 18
3.25 27
100/2.5"
100/2.75"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/30/2019 8/30/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
115
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.5 32
2.25 31
2.25 29
3.5 25 60 21 39
3.75 29
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/12/2019 9/12/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
116
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
13
6
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.0 27
4.5 25
4.0 23 72 22 50 0.5
4.5 20 58 19 39
4.0 18
100/1.25"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
117
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 27
1.75 331.0 88
2.75 32 80 26 54
100/2.75"
100/2"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
118
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.5 22 49 19 30
100/0.5"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
119
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.25 25 76 25 51 1.6
3.75 21
100/1.75"
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
120
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 23
1.5 31 78 26 52 0.5
100/2.25"
100/2.25"
100/1.25"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
121
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22 74 25 49 1.7
100/4.25"
100/1"
100/1"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
122
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21 73 23 50 0.4
4.25 242.3 99
100/4.25"
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
123
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.0 26
4.25 23 68 22 46
4.0 17
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
124
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
10
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
10.0
- with limestone fragments from 8 ft to 10 ft
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.5 32
2.75 28
2.75 25
4.25 21
3.75 20 39 17 22 0.0
25
11
100/2"
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
125
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
10
7
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.0 35
2.75 32
2.75 29
4.25 22 61 21 40 0.0
3.75 23
100/2.5"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
126
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.25 30
2.25 28
2.75 29
3.0 29
4.0 12 51 17 34 0.0
100/1.25"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
127
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20 72 23 49 0.7
3.5 24
3.75 25
17
32
30
28
100/3.25"
100/2.25"
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/29/2019 8/29/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
128
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
8
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.5 30
3.0 29
3.25 27 67 23 44 0.0
4.0 19
3.5 181.4 109
23
26
100/1.75"
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
129
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
11.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20 70 23 47
4.5+5
100/4.25"
100/2.25"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
130
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
11.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+16
4.5+16
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
131
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
11.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
-20
100/1.5"
100/1.75"
100/0.75"
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/10/2019 9/10/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
132
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
-16
100/1.75"
100/1"
100/1"
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
133
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+24 78 26 52 0.5
4.5+23
100/1.5"
100/2.25"
100/1.75"
100/2.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
134
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
10
11
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
3.75 25
2.75 31
3.0 23 57 18 39 0.0
2.75 24
26
26
100/3"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
135
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
11
13
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.75 28
4.5+22
3.5 23 77 24 53 2.5
3.75 18
14100/5.5"
100/2"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
136
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
8
14
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.75 32
3.0 29 77 26 51
2.5 29
4.0 17
2.5 14
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
137
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
10
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
- with limestone fragments from 4-6 ft
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+27
3.25 291.3 93
3.0 25 75 24 51
100/2"
100/1.25"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
138
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
11
9
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
1.75 32 68 24 44
2.0 32
2.75 28
3.0 13 53 17 36 0.0
18
16
100/2.5"
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
139
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
11
12
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.75 29
3.75 25
4.0 25
3.75 21
4.25 18 46 20 26
17
24
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/28/2019 8/28/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
140
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
12
13
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
8.0
Brown CLAY
12.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
2.5 30
3.0 29
3.75 26
3.5 27
3.25 24 60 20 40
18
20
100/1.75"
100/2"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
143
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/2.75"
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
144
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+10 49 19 30
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
145
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
-10
4.5+17 61 22 39 0.5
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
146
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
4.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
19.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+16
-8
4.5+16 58 19 39 0.3
100/2"
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
147
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
3.0 30 72 24 48 1.6
2.5 32
100/2.25"
100/0.5"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
148
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
6.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous nodules
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17 81 26 55 8.0
4.0 29
3.75 28
4.0 23 31 15 16
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
149
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17 69 21 48 0.0
100/2"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
150
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
-10
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/24/2019 8/24/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
151
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
3.0
- with limestone fragments from 2-3 ft
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15 64 24 40
4.5+13
100/2.5"
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/20/2019 8/20/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
152
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22 76 24 52 8.5
4.5+271.8 93
100/3"
100/0.75"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
153
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
18.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.5+14 39 20 19
100/1"
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
154
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
4.5+19
4.25 21 68 23 45 0.1
4.0 22
4.25 21
4.5 20
2.75 21 38 18 20
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
155
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+25 61 21 40
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
156
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/24/2019 8/24/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
157
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+15
4.5+22 72 23 49 2.3
100/2.75"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
158
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
4.5+23 78 25 53 0.9
100/4"
100/0.75"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
159
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
3.0
- with limestone fragments from 2-3 ft
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+12 59 21 38 4.3
4.5+14
100/1.5"
100/0.75"
100/0.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
160
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan and Gray CLAY
18.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+16 64 19 45
4.5+15
4.5+183.9 111
4.5+17 45 22 23 0.0
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
161
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20 61 22 39
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
162
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+14 61 24 37
100/1"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
163
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17 59 21 38 0.0
4.25 232.4 101
100/3.25"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
164
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
12.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+12 67 22 45
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
165
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+14 71 24 47
100/3"
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
166
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
4.5+17 58 20 38
4.5+18
4.5+13
4.5+17 47 21 26 0.0
4.5+19
3.5 17
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
167
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Tan and Gray CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+17 64 23 41
-7
-9
-14
-10
-12
4.5+14
100/3"
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
168
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
3.25 29 60 22 38
100/0.5"
100/1.25"
100/0.75"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
169
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+14
4.5+22 70 24 46 0.9
100/2.5"
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/20/2019 8/20/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
170
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/2.25"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
171
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21 74 24 50
100/0.75"
100/1.25"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
172
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/1.5"
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
173
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
13.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19 59 21 38
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/24/2019 8/24/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
174
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
15.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/3"
100/2.25"
100/1.25"
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
175
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21
4.5+23 80 27 53 2.0
100/3.75"
100/2"
100/1.5"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
176
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+21 65 22 43
100/0.75"
100/1.5"
100/1.25"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
177
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
17.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19 58 20 38
100/2.75"
100/2.25"
100/1.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
9/11/2019 9/11/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
178
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
6.0
Tan WEATHERED LIMESTONE
11.0
Tan and Gray SHALY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22
4.5+213.1 102
9 77 25 52
8
10
4.5 25 56 19 37
4.5+22
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/24/2019 8/24/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
179
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/3.5"
100/2.5"
100/2.75"
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
180
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
4.0
Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
7.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
16.0
Tan and Gray SHALEY CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+22 76 26 50
4.5+23
4.5+16
4.5+15 75 24 51 0.0
-9
-13100/2.5"
100/2.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/19/2019 8/19/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
181
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
1.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
14.0
Gray LIMESTONE with shale seams
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18 73 25 48
100/2.5"
100/1.5"
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
182
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+14 56 19 37 6.5
4.5+13
100/4"
100/2.5"
100/2.25"
100/1.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
183
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY with limestone fragments
2.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+7 38 19 19
100/1.75"
100/2.75"
100/1.75"
100/1.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/27/2019 8/27/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
184
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
2.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.5+10 36 16 20
100/4.25"
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
185
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
8.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
10.0
Tan and Gray CLAY
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
4.5+20 79 25 54
3.5 26
4.5 20
-13
4.5+19 61 20 41 0.0
4.25 18
100/5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
186
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
100/3.5"
100/2.25"
100/1.75"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
187
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20
4.5+21 72 24 48 2.5
4.5+23
4.5+17
4.0 15
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/27/2019 8/27/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
188
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
3.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+14
4.5+187.6 109
13
10
4.5+16 52 17 35 0.3
100/3.5"
100/2.25"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
189
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
9.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
10.0
Tan CLAY with limestone seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+20 69 22 47 6.1
4.5+21
4.5+22
4.5+11
4.5+18
4.5+18
100/4.25"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
190
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Brown CLAY with calcareous nodules
11.0
Tan CLAY with limestone seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19
4.5+17
4.5+16
4.5+17 44 20 24
15
4.5+15 41 20 21 0.0
4.5+16
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
191
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
4.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
10.0
Tan CLAY
13.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+19 70 20 50
4.5+17
100/3.75"
100/1.5"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
192
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
6.0
Light Brown CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+13
4.5+17 61 21 40
4.5+14
4.5+153.2 110
4.5 17
100/1"
100/1"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/26/2019 8/26/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
193
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Brown CLAY
5.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
8.0
Tan CLAY with limestone fragments
10.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+14
4.5+18
3.5 25
13
4.5+18 50 19 31 0.0
100/1.75"
100/1.5"
Sheet 1 of 1
Client:
Project:
Start Date:End Date:
Drilling Method:
BORING NO.:
PROJECT NO.:
Location:
Surface Elevation:
West:
North:
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):Depth, feetGraphic LogMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sample TypeRecovery %RQDTX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft, in)PocketPenetrometer (tsf)Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf)% PassingNo. 200 SieveUnit Dry Weight(pcf)Water Content, %Liquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexSwell, %GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
On Rods (ft):
After Drilling (ft):
After Hours (ft):
HInes Interests, LP - Dallas
Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
8/23/2019 8/23/2019
CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
194
W191259
Fort Worth, Texas
140 / 30
NONE
DRY
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth,Texas 76119
Phone:817-496-5600
Fax:817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
5
10
15
20
Dark Brown CLAY
6.0
Tan CLAY
11.0
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
20.0
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 20 FT
4.5+18
4.5+19
4.5+22 79 26 53 0.8
4.5+192.2 107
4.25 18
100/3.5"
100/0.75"
Sheet 1 of 1
4.5+13
100/
1.5"
100/
1.25"
Dark Brown CLAY
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FT
2.0
10.0
Surface Elevation:Unit Dry Weight(pcf)Depth, feet5
10
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
After Hours (ft):PocketPenetrometer (tsf)On Rods (ft):
Drilling Method:CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf).NONE
After Drilling (ft):.DRY
.
PROJECT NO.:W191259
Location:Fort Worth, Texas
Sheet 1 of 1
Water Content, %% PassingNo. 200 SieveLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexGraphic LogNorth:TX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft,in)Recovery %RQDSample TypeMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
West:
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth, Texas
76119
Phone: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
Start Date:8/22/2019 End Date:8/22/2019
Project:Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
Client:Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):140 / 30
BORING NO.:219
4.5+19
100/
1.25"
Dark Brown CLAY
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FT
2.0
10.0
Surface Elevation:Unit Dry Weight(pcf)Depth, feet5
10
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
After Hours (ft):PocketPenetrometer (tsf)On Rods (ft):
Drilling Method:CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf).NONE
After Drilling (ft):.DRY
.
PROJECT NO.:W191259
Location:Fort Worth, Texas
Sheet 1 of 1
Water Content, %% PassingNo. 200 SieveLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexGraphic LogNorth:TX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft,in)Recovery %RQDSample TypeMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
West:
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth, Texas
76119
Phone: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
Start Date:8/22/2019 End Date:8/22/2019
Project:Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
Client:Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):140 / 30
BORING NO.:220
4.5+
4.5+
4.5
3.5
3.5
17
19
20
20
14 23 13 10
Dark Brown CLAY
Light Brown CLAY
Tan CLAY
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FT
4.0
8.0
10.0
Surface Elevation:Unit Dry Weight(pcf)Depth, feet5
10
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
After Hours (ft):PocketPenetrometer (tsf)On Rods (ft):
Drilling Method:CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf).NONE
After Drilling (ft):.DRY
.
PROJECT NO.:W191259
Location:Fort Worth, Texas
Sheet 1 of 1
Water Content, %% PassingNo. 200 SieveLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexGraphic LogNorth:TX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft,in)Recovery %RQDSample TypeMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
West:
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth, Texas
76119
Phone: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
Start Date:8/22/2019 End Date:8/22/2019
Project:Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
Client:Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):
BORING NO.:221
4.5+
4.5+
4.5+
2.25
4.5+
17
22
10
18
5
30 17 13
Brown CLAY
Light Brown CLAY
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FT
4.0
10.0
Surface Elevation:Unit Dry Weight(pcf)Depth, feet5
10
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
After Hours (ft):PocketPenetrometer (tsf)On Rods (ft):
Drilling Method:CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf).NONE
After Drilling (ft):.DRY
.
PROJECT NO.:W191259
Location:Fort Worth, Texas
Sheet 1 of 1
Water Content, %% PassingNo. 200 SieveLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexGraphic LogNorth:TX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft,in)Recovery %RQDSample TypeMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
West:
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth, Texas
76119
Phone: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
Start Date:8/22/2019 End Date:8/22/2019
Project:Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
Client:Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):
BORING NO.:222
4.5+
4.5+
4.5+
9
19
11 23 13 10
100/
5"
Dark Brown CLAY
Tan CLAY with calcareous deposits
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FT
4.0
6.0
10.0
Surface Elevation:Unit Dry Weight(pcf)Depth, feet5
10
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
After Hours (ft):PocketPenetrometer (tsf)On Rods (ft):
Drilling Method:CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf).NONE
After Drilling (ft):.DRY
.
PROJECT NO.:W191259
Location:Fort Worth, Texas
Sheet 1 of 1
Water Content, %% PassingNo. 200 SieveLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexGraphic LogNorth:TX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft,in)Recovery %RQDSample TypeMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
West:
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth, Texas
76119
Phone: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
Start Date:8/22/2019 End Date:8/22/2019
Project:Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
Client:Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):140 / 30
BORING NO.:223
4.5+11
100/
0.5"
100/
0.5"
Dark Brown CLAY
Tan LIMESTONE with clay seams and layers
TEST BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FT
2.0
10.0
Surface Elevation:Unit Dry Weight(pcf)Depth, feet5
10
GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS
After Hours (ft):PocketPenetrometer (tsf)On Rods (ft):
Drilling Method:CONTINUOUS FLIGHT AUGER
Unconfined Comp.Strength (tsf).NONE
After Drilling (ft):.DRY
.
PROJECT NO.:W191259
Location:Fort Worth, Texas
Sheet 1 of 1
Water Content, %% PassingNo. 200 SieveLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexGraphic LogNorth:TX Cone or Std.Pen. (blows/ft,in)Recovery %RQDSample TypeMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
West:
5058 Brush Creek Rd.
Fort Worth, Texas
76119
Phone: 817-496-5600
Fax: 817-496-5608
www.alphatesting.com
Start Date:8/20/2019 End Date:8/20/2019
Project:Tradition, Central, and Southern Phase
Client:Hines Interests, LP - Dallas
Hammer Drop (lbs / in):140 / 30
BORING NO.:224
TEXAS CONE PENETRATION
FILL
LIMESTONE
(MH), Elastic SILT
SANDSTONE
(GP), Poorly Graded GRAVEL
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
VERY HIGH
4 TO 15
16 TO 25
26 TO 35
OVER 35
SAMPLING SYMBOLS
(OL), ORGANIC SILT
(OH), ORGANIC CLAY
8.0" OR LARGER
3.0" TO 8.0"
0.75" TO 3.0"
5.0 mm TO 3.0"
2.0 mm TO 5.0 mm
0.4 mm TO 5.0 mm
0.07 mm TO 0.4 mm
0.002 mm TO 0.07 mm
LESS THAN 0.002 mm
SOIL & ROCK SYMBOLS
KEY TO SOIL SYMBOLS
AND CLASSIFICATIONS
(CH), High Plasticity CLAY VERY LOOSE
LOOSE
MEDIUM
DENSE
VERY DENSE
RELATIVE DENSITY OF COHESIONLESS SOILS (blows/ft)
0 TO 4
5 TO 10
11 TO 30
31 TO 50
OVER 50
SHELBY TUBE (3" OD except where
noted otherwise)
SPLIT SPOON (2" OD except where
noted otherwise)
AUGER SAMPLE
ROCK CORE (2" ID except where
noted otherwise)
PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION (DIAMETER)
(CL), Low Plasticity CLAY
(SP), Poorly Graded SAND
(GW), Well Graded GRAVEL
(GC), CLAYEY GRAVEL
(GM), SILTY GRAVEL
BOULDERS
COBBLES
COARSE GRAVEL
FINE GRAVEL
COURSE SAND
MEDIUM SAND
FINE SAND
SILT
CLAY
TRACE
LITTLE
SOME
AND
1 TO 10
11 TO 20
21 TO 35
36 TO 50
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS (%)
VERY SOFT
SOFT
FIRM
STIFF
VERY STIFF
HARD
LESS THAN 0.25
0.25 TO 0.50
0.50 TO 1.00
1.00 TO 2.00
2.00 TO 4.00
OVER 4.00
SHEAR STRENGTH OF COHESIVE SOILS (tsf)
RELATIVE DEGREE OF PLASTICITY (PI)SHALE / MARL
(SC), CLAYEY SAND
(SW), Well Graded SAND
(SM), SILTY SAND
(ML), SILT