Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 45519 (2)21Ptit: CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS COMM? Gk©Crtgn12...isaisaimealassb STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a Texas home -rule municipality (the "CITY"), and Halff Associates, Inc., authorized to do business in Texas, an independent contractor ("Consultant"), for a STUDY generally described as: McCart/Berry Flood Mitigation Study. Article I Scope of Services (1) Consultant hereby agrees to perform as an independent contractor the services set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Attachment "A". These services shall be performed in connection with McCart/Berry Flood Mitigation Study. (2) Additional services, if any, will be requested in writing by the City. City shall not pay for any work performed by Consultant or its subconsultants, subcontractors and/or suppliers that has not been ordered in writing. It is specifically agreed that Consultant shall not be compensated for any alleged additional work resulting from oral orders of any person. Article 11 Compensation Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the Fee Schedule shown in Attachment "B". Payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to complete the services described in Attachment "A". However the total fee paid by the City shall not exceed a total of $438,000.00 unless the City and the Consultant mutually agree upon a fee amount for additional services and amend this Agreement accordingly. The Consultant shall provide monthly invoices to the City. Payment for services rendered shall be due within thirty (30) days of the uncontested performance of the particular services so ordered and receipt by City of Consultant's invoice for payment of same. Acceptance by Consultant of said payment shall operate as and shall release the City from all claims or liabilities under this Agreement for anything related to, done, or furnished in connection with the services for which payment is made, including any act or omission of the City in connection with such services. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page 1 of 8 OFFICIAL WECORD CITY sEcRETAm" FT. W •' IVCOR Article III Term Unless terminated pursuant to the terms herein, this Agreement shall be for a term of three (3) years beginning upon the date of its execution, or until the completion of the subject matter contemplated herein, whichever occurs first. Article IV Independent Contractor Consultant shall operate hereunder as an independent contractor, and not as an officer, agent, servant, or employee of the City. Consultant shall have exclusive control of and the exclusive right to control the details of its work to be performed hereunder and all persons performing same, and shall be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors. The doctrine of respondent superior shall not apply as between City and Consultant, its officers, agents employees, contractors, and subcontractors, and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between City and Consultant. Article V Professional Competence and Indemnification (1) Work performed by Consultant shall comply in all aspects with all applicable local, state and federal laws and with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the local, state and national boards, bureaus and agencies. Approval by the City shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant or its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of its services performed hereunder. (2) In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City against liability for any damage caused by or resulting from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by the Consultant or Consultant's agent, consultant under contract, or another entity over which the Consultant's exercises control. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page2of8 Article VI Insurance (1) Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required under this Article and the City has approved such insurance, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all similar insurance of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approval given by the City; provided, however, Consultant may elect to add any subconsultant as an additional insured under its liability policies. Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 each accident (or reasonably equivalent limits of coverage if written on a split limits basis). Coverage shall be on any vehicle used in the course of the Study. Worker's Compensation Coverage A: statutory limits Coverage B: $100,000 each accident $500,000 disease - policy limit $100,000 disease - each employee (2) Additional Insurance Requirements a. Except for employer's liability insurance coverage under Consultant's worker's compensation insurance policy, the City, its officers, employees and servants shall be endorsed as an additional insured on Consultant's insurance policies. b. Certificates of insurance shall be delivered to the Transportation and Public Works Department, Attention: Steve Eubanks, 1000 Throckmorton Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102, prior to commencement of work. c. Any failure on part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements specified herein. d Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide the City a minimum thirty days notice of cancellation, non -renewal, and/or material change in policy terms or coverage. A ten days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page 3 of 8 e. Insurers must be authorized to do business in the State of Texas and have a current A.M. Best rating of A: VII or equivalent measure of financial strength and solvency. f. Other than worker's compensation insurance, in lieu of traditional insurance, City may consider alternative coverage or risk treatment measures through insurance pools or risk retention groups. The City must approve in writing any alternative coverage. g. Workers' compensation insurance policy(s) covering employees employed on the Study shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation providing rights of recovery in favor of the City. h. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for Consultants insurance. i. Consultant's insurance policies shall each be endorsed to provide that such insurance Is primary protection and any self -funded or commercial coverage maintained by City shall not be called upon to contribute to Toss recovery. In the course of the Agreement, Consultant shall report, in a timely manner, to City s officially designated contract administrator any known loss occurrence which could give rise to a liability claim or lawsuit or which could result in a property loss. k. Consultant's liability shall not be limited to the specified amounts of insurance required herein. I. Upon the request of City Consultant shall provide complete copies of all insurance policies required by these Agreement documents. Article VII Transfer or Assignment City and Consultant each bind themselves, and their lawful successors and assigns to this Agreement. Consultant, its lawful successors and assigns, shall not assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without prior written consent of the City. Article VIII Termination of Contract (1) City may terminate this Agreement for its convenience on 30 days' written notice. Either the City or the Consultant for cause may terminate this Agreement if either Party fails substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page 4 of 8 commence correction of such nonperformance with 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the correction thereafter (2) If City chooses to terminate this Agreement under Article 8, upon receipt of notice of termination, Consultant shall discontinue services rendered up to the date of such termination and City shall compensate Consultant based upon calculations in Article 2 of this Agreement and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. (3) All reports, whether partial or complete, prepared under this Agreement, including any original drawings or documents, whether furnished by the City, its officers agents, employees, consultants, or contractors, or prepared by Consultant, shall be or become the property of the City, and shall be furnished to the City prior to or at the time such services are completed, or upon termination or expiration of this Agreement. Article IX Right to Audit (1) Consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of Consultant involving transactions relating to this Agreement. Consultant agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate workspace in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. City shall give Consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits. (2) Consultant further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder, a provision to the effect that the subcontracting consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under the subcontract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such sub -consultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further that City shall have access during normal working hours to all sub - consultant facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article. City shall give Consultant and any sub -consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audit. (3) Consultant and sub -consultants agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the City. The City agrees to reimburse Consultant for the cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page 5 of 8 Article X Small Business Enterprise (SBE) Participation In accordance with the City's Business Diversity Enterprise Ordinance No 20020-12-2011, as amended, the City has goals for the participation of small business enterprises in City contracts. Consultant acknowledges the SBE goals established for this Agreement and its accepted written commitment to SBE participation. Any misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent misrepresentation) and/or the commission of fraud by the Consultant may result in the termination of this Agreement and debarment from participating in City contracts for a period of time of not less than three (3) years. Article XI Observe and Comply Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any way affect this Agreement and the work hereunder, and shall observe and comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which may exist or may be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for such enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be considered. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and all of its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims or liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law, ordinance, or regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees. Article XII Venue and Jurisdiction If any action, whether real or asserted, at law or in equity, arises on the basis of any provision of this Agreement, venue for such action shall lie in state courts located in Tarrant County Texas or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Fort Worth Division. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. Article XIII Contract Construction The Parties acknowledge that each party and, if it so chooses, its counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party must not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits hereto. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page 6 of 8 Article XIV Severability The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section or other part of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall ever be held by any court of competent Jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such word, phrase clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or other part of this Agreement to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid or unconstitutional portion had never been contained therein. Article XV Notices Notices to be provided hereunder shall be sufficient if forwarded to the other Party by hand -delivery or via U.S. Postal Service certified mail return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the address of the other Party shown below: City of Fort Worth Attn: Steve Eubanks 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Consultant: Halff Associates, Inc. Attn: Terry M. Barr 4000 Fossil Creek Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76137 Article XVI Headings The headings contained herein are for the convenience in reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page 7 of 8 Article XVII Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and each counterpart shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. Executed and effective this thea/day of , 201y BY: CITY OF FORT WORTH 7—*61.,,g••••tweh CoLs. Fernando Costa Assistant City Manager Date: ¢fr ///•it APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: By: Douglas/. Wiersig, P.E. Director, Transportation & P APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY By: _ ICretz 64. fr- fa dan ArVisocc City Attorney ATTEST: Mary J. Kays City Secretary City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services Page 8 of 8 BY: ENGINEER Halff Associates, Inc. Andrew Ickert, P.E., CFM Authorized Agent Date: M&C No.: M&CDate: 1,e/5sei3 MCCART-BERRY FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 S COPE OF SERVICES P repared by. Halff Associates, Inc. March 26, 2014 INDEX Study Area and Background P urpose and Need S tudy Objectives Definition of "Planning Level" S takeholders Compliance Statement BASIC SERVICES P hase One Task 1: Study Coordination and Management Task 2: Discovery and Data Collection Task 3: Existing Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulics Task 4: Opportunities and Challenges Assessment Task 5: Identification and Assessment of Potential Features P hase Two Task 6: Preferred Concept Plan Development Task 7: F►nal Report HALFF S tudy Area and Background The Forest Park -Berry watershed refers to a large storm drain watershed in the vicinity of the intersection of Forest Park Boulevard and West Berry Street. The storm sewer system, with a drainage area of 1.27 square miles, outfalls at McPherson Avenue, eventually drains to the Clear Fork Trinity River via Zoo Creek. This watershed includes several residential n eighborhoods, a business district along West Berry Street, Paschal High School, and the e astern portion of Texas Christian University. The area is fully developed, although some ✓ acant or underutilized parcels exist within the study area There is a proposed transit facility and future TEXRaiI passenger rail station near the intersection of West Berry Street and Cleburne Road. The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the City are currently developing a Transit Oriented Development plan (TOD) for the areas surrounding this future station. Purpose and Need The purpose of this study is to further investigate the feasibility of alternative measures and evaluate methods to reduce the frequency and magnitude of flooding in the Forest Park -Berry watershed, in particular along the West Berry Street business corridor; and to ensure that appropriate provisions are made for future drainage infrastructure needs as the area re- develops. This is necessary to prevent the continued damages from flooding and to increase the public safety and welfare in the area. Study Objectives • Identify an affordable and acceptable plan to reduce flood risk (or significantly increase level of flood protection) and frequent flooding in the Study Area Protection of all properties from flooding in the 5-year storm is the primary minimum target. Page 1 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES • • • • HALFF Develop alternatives that utilize storage -based and non-traditional methods to reduce flood risk. These include linear features along natural overland drainage patterns that provide a hybrid function of secondary conveyance and storage and that can be enhanced with urban design, landscape architecture, green -space, and recreational features; storage in the P aschal High School campus and other areas; and low -impact features. Consider and utilize (where feasible) opportunities to blend features with other initiatives and plans, and consider implementation opportunities in conjunction with the TCU/Berry TOD P lan and Form Based Code. Avoid unacceptable increases in flood risk elsewhere, including downstream in Zoo Creek. P rovide a conceptual plan that demonstrates the proposed solution is feasible, acceptable, and constructible. Definition of "Planning Level" The work described in this Scope of Services is a Planning Level exercise. "Planning Level" refers to a level of detail and related work effort specified within this study scope, and is defined as the "level of detail in investigation analyses and conceptual layout necessary to support the identification of plans and subsequent decisions regarding selection of alternatives and implementation of future projects, including communication with the public." After completion of the study additional detail outside of the scope of this study will be developed to support preliminary and final engineering design and construction. S takeholders P revious studies have identified and engaged key external and internal stakeholders in the community They include the affected residents, neighborhood associations, the Berry Street Initiative (a coalition of business owners along the Berry Street corridor), Texas Christian U niversity, Fort Worth Independent School District, the Fort Worth Transportation Authority (The "T), and the City of Fort Worth Planning and Development Department. This study will include limited engagement with stakeholders unless the City deems it prudent once a preferred concept is identified and developed. As part of this study, a plan for public outreach and involvement will be developed for use in future phases as the City moves toward design of a mitigation solution. Compliance Statement The work in this Scope of Services will be in accordance with the August 2012 City of Fort iSWM Criteria Manual for Site Development and Construction, with the following exceptions: • • • The resultant 100-year flood may not be contained within the public nght-of-way, as required by criteria. In lieu thereof, any concept plan proposed will strive to reduce the 100-year flood and will not increase 100-year flood risk at any location. The geometry of any proposed detention basins may not be in accordance with the specifications in the manual. In such cases designs will be coordinated with the City to ensure they are sustainable and maintainable. The 2012 COFW iSWM Manual uses three storms, 1-, 10- and 100-year. Exception would be to use storms other than the three prescribed in the manual. BASIC SERVICES The following Basic Services are to be provided by the Halff Team. Page 2 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase One El HALFF Task 1: Study Coordination and Management The Halff team will complete the following activities in support of the study and communication between the Halff Team the City, and the Program Management Team (PMT). A. Kickoff Meeting: The Halff Team shall attend one kickoff meeting with City Staff (with representation from Stormwater and Planning Departments and the Program Management Team. Discussion should include introduction of study team, review of study history, understanding of problems, identification of key stakeholders, recognition of any unique elements, review of objectives, and review of the study scope. The discussion will focus on stormwater and urban planning within the study area. B. Study Meetings: The Halff Team shall attend regular study meetings with the City and PMT These meetings will include the work sessions identified in the various tasks. The meetings will include a review of the study, and will discuss the pertinent activities associated with the study. 1. Agenda — Two days prior to the meeting, the Halff Team will submit a draft agenda to the Program Manager The Program Manager will utilize this to prepare an agenda. 2. Facilitation of Meeting — The Program Manager will chair the study meetings and will ensure the meeting follows the agenda 3. Action Items — At the conclusion of the meeting a list of Action Items will be reviewed. 4. Meeting minutes — The Halff Team shall prepare meeting minutes to capture key decisions and action items. Issues discussed should be noted. The meeting minutes shall be submitted to the Program Manager for review and approval within three days of the meeting. Coordination with TCU/Berry TOD/Form Based Code study. The Halff Team will attend the TCU/Berry TOD Plan and Form -Based Code Study design charrette. At this charrette, the City shall conceptually introduce stormwater control as an important component of future projects, including the idea that the appropriate configuration of connections from the TOD outwards may provide opportunities for flood mitigation features. Subsequent to the TOD design charrette, the Halff Team will coordinate with the TOD Plan consultant to incorporate stormwater recommendations of the Halff Team into the TCU/Berry TOD Plan and Form -Based Code. C. Schedule: The Halff Team shall maintain a study schedule in Microsoft Project. This schedule shall be submitted bi-monthly along with a Schedule Risk report that identified items behind schedule and other schedule risks. A recovery plan will be provided. If it is necessary to revise the schedule, the Halff Team shall submit a Schedule Change Control form to the Program Manager D. Monthly Summary: The Halff Team shall prepare a bi-monthly progress summary report using the City's Monthly Summary Form. The Bi-Monthly Summary shall include a summary of work completed, description of work in the upcoming 2 months, and should note any key issues related to the study scope and budget. E. Invoice: The Halff Team shall invoice the City monthly, and provide the necessary MWBE report to the City. Page 3 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES Deliverables • Agenda and minutes of kick-off and regular meetings • Updated Schedule on a bi-monthly basis as and if applicable • Bi-monthly progress report • Monthly invoice Client Responsibility: • Agenda and facilitation of bi-monthly study meetings Number of meetings: • One (1) kick-off meeting • One (1) participation in TOD charrette • Two (2) to consult with TOD/Form Based Code Study Manager MEM Q°° HALFF Task 2: Discovery and Data Collection The Halff Team will perform reconnaissance, acquire and organize data, review, and synthesize existing plans and data as detailed below. A. Research/update stakeholder database: The Halff Team will review and update the current stakeholder database and update as necessary. Based on TAD and/or City of Fort Worth records, the Halff Team will ensure all property owners are included in the database. TAD ownership data will include current property appraisals. The final product will be a comprehensive database comprised of residents, property owners, neighborhood organizations, businesses, religious organizations, schools, elected and appointed officials and business organizations. B. Site Visit: The Halff Team, City and PMT will tour the study area together. The City will assist in determining the most appropriate route to focus on key issues within the study area and locations pertinent to the study. C. Internal Team Brainstorming: The Halff Team will broadly discuss how planning and stormwater control can and should intersect in this watershed. The discussion will form the basis for the tasks to follow. D. Revitalization Interdepartmental Meeting: The Halff Team will facilitate a meeting with high level representation of key City departments to discuss future neighborhood and infrastructure revitalization goals, opportunities challenges, and funding for the study area. Participants to include relevant departments (e.g. Planning and Development, Environmental Management Transportation and Public Works, Housing and Economic Development, Water, and Parks and Community Services), including City Manager level participation. E Context and Background Information: The Halff Team will acquire and review relevant data, assess the applicability of LID features and review existing plans and studies in the Study Area. 1. Data Acquisition - City will provide relevant previous studies, models, GIS data, elevation data, as -built plans, flooding complaints, planning related data and studies completed in the study area including any planning related data and studies Page 4 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES an HALF produced by others, e.g. TCU, the Fort Worth ISD, and The T, and other relevant information to the Halff Team. The Halff Team shall acquire additional data and information as needed from available data sources. Utility data limited to spatial locations of storm drain, water, and waste water will also be considered 2. LID Applicability for Forest Park -Berry — Key members of the Halff Team will prepare a generic LID Applicability Memorandum that would outline the most likely LID alternatives that could be successfully implemented in the watershed. Based on past experience and additional research on relevant examples (i.e. Kansas City, Seattle) this document will help guide the planning and conceptual design phases to follow. 3. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Models — City will provide the current versions of the hydrologic and hydraulic models used to simulate and quantify flooding in the Forest Park -Berry watersheds. This includes the InfoWorks ICM model provided by the PMT for the Forest Park -Berry watershed, along with the accompanying drainage area maps, schematics and hydrologic parameter information. 4. Data Synthesis — The Halff Team shall document and organize data, and review data as necessary to gain necessary understanding of the problem area previous studies, and potential solutions. Previous plans shall be thoroughly reviewed and understood Halff Team will prepare a technical memo summarizing existing plans and studies that provide background and may have impact on the study, including but not limited to: previous feasibility studies, Fort Worth Comprehensive Plan, parks trails, and open space plans, TOD plans, flood maps, and storm sewer maps. 5. Field Reconnaissance — Separate from the Halff Team, City and PMT site visit, the Halff Team shall visit the locations pertinent to the study. The Halff Team shall take pertinent photographs and develop a digest of photographs and GIS Shapefile index. 6. The Halff Team shall organize the collected data to develop GIS depictions of key elements that are relevant to the study a Study area, drainage area delineation, existing drainage system, parcels, land use, zoning, streets rail utilities (if available with spatial locations), and pipelines (if available with spatial locations). b. Raster data sets, including: Aerial photographs, LiDAR based contours and LiDAR based digital elevation maps. c. Additional information — the Halff Team will prepare additional shapefile data reflecting plans by others (such as TCU, the City of Fort Worth, Fort Worth ISD, The "T', and others) and other information relevant to the study. F. Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)' Engineer will perform a Level D SUE analysis for the study area in the vicinity of any proposed alternatives. More detailed Level B SUE may be conducted in the vicinity of major detention facilities or conveyance improvements in order to assist with the concept planning and constructability review. G. System Conditions Assessment Stormwater features analyzed in the study shall be assessed for structural conditions. Pipe features shall be documented with either photographic evidence or CCTV inspection. If available, the ENGINEER may obtain CCTV from a recent previously performed inspection in lieu of performing new inspections. Pipes shall be ranked as good, fair, or poor. Inlets and manholes shall also be documents and noted as good, fair, or poor. An exhibit indicating location and condition of all features, associated photos or video, and any field notes shall be submitted to the City. Page 5 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES Deliverables • Technical Memorandum summarizing past studies and plans • Comprehensive Stakeholder Database • Assembled GIS data • Geo-referenced Photographs from field Investigation and GIS Shapefile index • LID Applicability Technical Memorandum. • SUE data Client Responsibility: • Current versions of the hydrologic and hydraulic models • Provide pertinent technical reports and data, meeting space • Provide vehicle(s) and participate in site tour • Arrange revitalization interdepartmental meeting Number of meetings: • One (1) interdepartmental meeting • Two (2) site visits Task 3: Existing Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulics The Halff Team will be provided the InfoWorks ICM model to be used for planning level hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and modeling to determine and demonstrate the performance of the system and to assist in sizing features The model will be updated with the most current elevation data and Zoo Creek will be added to form a comprehensive Base InfoWorks ICM Model', which all proposed conditions modeling will use as a starting condition. A. Existing InfoWorks ICM Model: The Halff Team will simulate the Forest Park System using the existing conditions InfoWorks ICM model provided by the Project Management Team for the Forest Park -Berry watershed 1. Obtain and Review Existing ICM Model — Halff Team will evaluate the model and prepare a document summarizing any recommended model adjustments in coordination with the model improvement efforts conducted by the Program Management Team Model adjustments will be addressed by Halff during this task. Any major deficiencies will be discussed with the City and PMT to determine the appropriate action 2. Update DTM and ICM Ground Model — Halff will update the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) based on any additional LiDAR or field survey information such that the terrain is as accurate as possible The updated DTM will be imported into ICM to generate a Ground Model from which the 2D mesh will be developed. Detail will be added to the mesh as needed. 3. Update ICM Nodes and Links — The storm sewer infrastructure within the Forest Park/Berry watershed has been identified and mapped in detail since the original InfoWorks SD model was built and subsequently converted to ICM. Halff will update the node and link elevations in the ICM model based on the latest City of Fort Worth GIS information as well as any survey data gathered from the Zoo Creek Tunneling Feasibility Study (SWS-052). 4 Zoo Creek Modeling — Halff will add the open channel river reach for Zoo Creek from the McPherson outfall to the West Fork Trinity River Oxbow The HEC- RAS models Page 6 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES Fau rr H MEM from the Zoo Creek Hydraulic Study (City Proj. 00079) will be utilized as much as possible to avoid duplication of effort; however, revised geometry will be taken from the most current terrain dataset. B. Hydrology: The Halff Team will develop rainfall hyetographs for a range of events and durations including the 3-hour, 6-hour and 24-hour rainfall for the 1-year, 2-year, 5- year, 10-year, and 100-year events using depth -duration information for Tarrant County. Additional 24-hour hyetographs will be prepared for the 25- and 50-year events. In order to account for the flows from the Warner Creek subbasin, hydrographs from the HEC- HMS model developed as part of the Warner Creek Open Channel Study (SWS-011) will be added into the ICM model as an internal boundary condition. C. Existing Conditions InfoWorks ICM Simulations: The Halff Team will develop simulations of the Forest Park -Berry system using the 3-hour, 6-hour, and 24-hour duration hydrographs for the 1-year 2-year 5-year, 10-year, and 100-year events. Critical storm duration that will be considered for this study will be determined by the Halff Team with input from the City and PMT. Additional simulations will be run for the 24-hour, 25- and 50-year events. D. Existing Conditions Inundation Maps: The Halff Team will prepare 2D depth files in a Geodatabase format showing the inundation for each storm event for the selected critical storm durations. Refined inundation maps will be prepared as part of the final report. E. Existing Conditions Assessment. The Halff Team will evaluate the drainage patterns in the Forest Park/Berry watershed and determine the approximate runoff volume and inundation elevation along each of the major trunk line systems for the selected critical storm durations. 1. Update Flood Depth Data — Halff will generate flood depth grids based on the InfoWorks ICM modeling for the critical storms. 2. Assess Flood Hazards — Using the flood depth grids and velocity information, the Halff Team will assess the watershed and identify the areas with the greatest flood hazards. 3. Update Flood Damage Assessment — Halff will use the revised flood depths and damage calculations done as part of the AECOM study to update the flood damage estimates for the watershed. 4. Runoff Volume Determination — Halff will determine the approximate runoff volumes and inundation elevations along each of the major trunk lines for the critical storm events determined. F. Interim Drainage Assessment Meeting: The Halff Team will meet with the City and PMT to discuss findings of Existing Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulics. Deliverables • Interim document describing modeling, modifications and results. • Inundation maps for the selected critical storm durations, 1-year, 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 100-year events • Computed flood volumes and elevations for studied events. • Presentation material for discussion at work session FF Page 7 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES Client Responsibility: • Provide basic models • Attend hydrology and hydraulics review meeting Number of meetings: • One (1) City and PMT Work Session HALFF Task 4: Opportunities and Challenges Assessment The Halff Team will assess watershed wide opportunities and challenges to reduce flood risk while implementing quality of life features/amenities such as pocket parks with rain gardens greenways with trails, traffic calming green streets, etc. A. Internal Brainstorming Session: The Halff Team will meet to discuss and brainstorm the integration of watershed wide opportunities and challenges with regards to quality of life planning and flood protection. B. Planning Assessment: Based on data assemblage and field work completed in previous tasks, the Halff Team will identify the general location, scale, and nature of planning level opportunities and challenges within the study area. Planning opportunities will be considered in light of other initiatives and plans including the TCU/Berry TOD and Form -Based Code study Opportunities and challenges will be evaluated in terms of impact to neighborhood integrity and quality of life, and flood protection capacity. C. Drainage Feature Assessment: Based on general assumptions and the runoff volumes estimated in Task 3, the Halff Team will analyze the incremental effects of various generic LID and conventional/traditional strategies applied across the study area. This will be a general analysis to eliminate any non -practical alternatives and decide upon feasible LID features and conventional/traditional strategies. Selected features and strategies will be generally evaluated to estimate unit storage volumes, construction costs and maintenance cost per surface area. This data will be used to compare strategies, estimate effectiveness, and utilization for the assessment of potential features as described in Task 5. D. O&M Recommendations: O&M for LID features may require a shift from the traditional approach and execution of O&M. The Halff Team will provide a summary of general O&M recommendations for the recommended LID features E City and PMT Work Session: Opportunities and challenges will be discussed during a work session with the City and PMT. Deliverables • Technical memo describing: watershed wide opportunities, challenges, and incremental effects of various LID and conventional/traditional strategies applied across the study area, and general O&M recommendations for LID features. • Presentation material for discussion at work sessions. Client Responsibility • Comment on memos • Participate in City and PMT Work session Page 8 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 S COPE OF SERVICES • Provide meeting rooms for work session N umber of meetings: • One (1) Work Session with the City and PMT r HALFF Task 5: Identification and Assessment of Potential Features The Halff Team will identify and size potential stormwater conveyance and storage features u sing the InfoWorks ICM model and update as needed. These potential stormwater features will result from a collaborative effort of the planners and engineers to identify locations with o pportunities for flood risk reduction and potential projects related to TOD and other developments. In addition, specific stormwater features such as underground detention, that may not relate to planned development or LID -related attributes will also be examined. A. Storage Volume Evaluation: The Halff Team will review the results of the InfoWorks ICM simulations, and determine the approximate storage volumes required to improve the performance of the watershed wide system. Storage volumes may be spatially derived based on subareas to offset hydrograph peaks if feasible. This assessment will consider the range of rainfall events and durations. The estimated storage volume required to mitigate each of the modeled rainfall events will be identified and serve as the target value for determining detention options. A working meeting with the City and PMT will be held to evaluate the storage volume and discuss recommendations from the Halff Team. The City, PMT and Halff Team will agree upon a range of storage volume targets under three conveyance and detention scenarios Least Aggressive, Moderately Aggressive, and Most Aggressive as described below in Subsection B. B. Proposed Scenario Development: The Halff Team will identify potential detention areas within the study area, with a focus on the areas near the Berry Street corridor, between Berry Street and Cleburne, and residential areas upstream of Cleburne Road. The Halff Team will focus on linear corridors that can act as combinations of conveyance and detention, using a series of control structures. The Halff Team will develop three conveyance and detention scenarios, as described below. For each scenario, the Halff Team will identify, at a planning level, the potential storage volume that may be acquired, potential control structure locations, and necessary modifications to the drainage network. Detention scenarios will be applied to both private and publicly owned properties. However with the uncertainty of private entities' commitment to implementation and maintenance the focus will be on publicly owned properties 1. Least Aggressive Scenario — The Halff Team will identify potential detention in areas that have the most straightforward implementation. The goal of this is, if possible, to identify the volume necessary to meet the target storage from Subsection A. This scenario may involve acquisition of property, but will focus on property that is likely part of redevelopment and revitalization plans. This scenario may include areas subject to the TOD plan, but will recognize that reservation of this land will be limited. This scenario will involve minimal disruption to the existing drainage network. 2. Moderately Aggressive Scenario — The Halff Team will identify potential detention sites and features that provide the storage necessary to meet the target volume from Subsection A. This scenario will consider the effect of property acquisition and relocation of drainage infrastructure. The Halff Team will identify the most reasonable and cost effective means of obtaining the desired volume If clear Page 9 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES Egi � i FF m constraints exist that prevent the reasonable identification of features, a reduced volume will be identified. 3. Most Aggressive Scenario — The Halff Team will identify detention features that provide the volume storage required to meet the target volume from Subsection A. This will involve property acquisition, the relocation of drainage infrastructure, and LID features, with no constraints imposed on the formulation of this detention scenario. C. Proposed Scenario Modeling: The Halff Team will develop proposed conditions IW ICM models, including large-scale detention and/or conveyance facilities for the three scenarios discussed above The Halff team will incorporate changes to hydrologic data and parameters from existing conditions, including LID surface storage, media, storage layer, and underdrains. The Halff Team will reflect generic LID impacts through adjustment of relevant hydrologic and hydraulic parameters for the various LID facilities. Analysis will be performed using the same critical duration storms as the existing conditions modeling. D. Preliminary LID Modeling: The Halff Team will develop preliminary modeling of proposed LID features using InfoWorks ICM, guided by EPA-SWMM. The general effectiveness of proposed LID elements will be evaluated using detailed EPA-SWMM modeling for five (5) selected sub -basins. Based on the results of the detailed EPA- SWMM modeling, Halff will develop a procedure to incorporate LID impacts into the IW ICM. This procedure is intended to account for the impacts of LID through normal hydrologic and hydraulic parameters, such that the process may be utilized for other studies, regardless of the modeling software. It is the intent of the Halff Team to include the proposed improvements, both LID impacts and larger structural measures, in a single model platform. E Revision of Storage Targets and Detention Feature Locations: The Halff Team may recommend to the City and PMT the revision of storage volume targets and proposed detention feature locations. The City and PMT, Halff Team will jointly consider these recommendations and revise proposed scenarios as needed. F. Schematic Concept Plan Development 1. Concept Layout Plans — The Halff Team will prepare a total of three (3) schematic concepts (one per detention scenario) in the form of rough layout plans of the detention scenarios discussed above. Some initial urban design and landscape architectural features may be identified at this point (particularly potential sections, side slopes, retaining walls etc. that impact volume computations), but the focus is on the provision of volume and flood damage reduction The Halff Team will consider and utilize (where feasible) opportunities to blend features with other initiatives and plans, and consider implementation opportunities in conjunction with the TOD study. 2. Planning Level Cost Estimates — The Halff Team will prepare planning level cost estimates based upon the rough layouts. The cost estimates will focus on the major cost items and property acquisition, and will include a placeholder for urban design and landscape architectural enhancement The cost estimates shall also include appropriate contingencies for a planning level estimate Page 10 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY El HALFF CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 n SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Selection of Preferred Schematic Concept Plan 1. Screening of Schematic Concept Plans — The Halff Team will perform an initial feasibility assessment of each of the three (3) schematic concept plans This assessment will include the estimated annualized cost of each concept. Tangible and intangible benefits will also be considered, but will not be quantified. 2. Decision Making Matrix - A matrix will be prepared to compare and contrast the acceptability (politically), effectiveness (technically), and affordability (economics) aspects of the three schematic concept plans. 3. During a City and PMT work session, one (1) schematic concept plan will be selected as the Preferred Concept to move into Phase 2 once the Go/No-Go decision has been made (see next item J) J. Guidance on a Go -No Go Decision 1. The Halff Team will meet with the City and PMT to discuss the schematic concepts and provide guidance to the City to assist with the "Go or No Go' decision. a. If a "No -Go" decision is made, Halff will proceed with the preparation of a Final Report, as described in Task 7 b. If a "Go" decision is made, Halff will proceed with the Preferred Concept Plan Development, as described in Task 6. Deliverables • Proposed conditions IW ICM models for the three proposed scenarios • Schematic concept plans for the three proposed scenarios • Planning level cost estimates for those alternatives • Technical memo describing development and screening of schematic concepts, feasibility assessment, and recommendations. • Technical memo detailing the discussion and decisions made by the City and PMT regarding the "Go or No -Go' decision. Client Responsibility: • Participate in work sessions • Comment on interim documents Number of meetings: • Three (3) work sessions Page 11 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY um HALFF CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase Two Task 6: Preferred Concept Plan Development — The Halff Team will develop urban design and landscape architectural concepts for the Preferred Concept Plan as developed and selected in Tasks 4 and 5. These concepts will include urban design and landscape architectural features and will be presented to the City and PMT. A. Initial Urban Design and Landscape Architectural Concept: The Halff Team will develop two (2) urban design and landscape architectural concepts, for the Preferred Concept Plan. The concepts will consider connectivity with the surrounding environment compatibility with plans by others, potential to create green infrastructure or other linkages within and through the study area — particularly the TCU/Berry TOD area, and constructability. The concepts will be presented in the form of rough sketch overlays on GIS-based maps, and will be presented to the City and PMT in a work session. The City and PMT will comment on the concepts and plans and will provide direction to the Halff Team in the finalization of one (1) urban design and landscape architectural concept B. Refine Urban Design and Landscape Architectural Concept: The Halff Team will refine the one (1) preferred landscape architectural concept based upon the work session with the City and PMT. 1. Considerations — The preferred alternative should further consider connectivity to the community, waikability, public features and compatibility with other plans cost, and provision of the desired storage volume. 2. Coordination — The Halff Team will support City staff in meeting with other entities (up to one (1) meeting facilitated by City staff) with plans that may be impacted by the study, or that may have the opportunity for joint -use or plan enhancement. 3. Affected Properties — The Halff Team will develop a listing of affected properties. 4. Conceptual Opinions of Probable Costs — Previously developed cost estimates from Subsection 4.0 will be refined to include more detail, although they should still be considered planning level. 5. Presentation of Refined Landscape Architectural Concept - The refined concept will be presented to the City and PMT at a scale necessary to properly illustrate the concept. Presentation will include plan view and cross sections, including urban design and landscape architectural renderings that illustrate how the features fit into the surrounding environment. C. Constructability Review: The Halff Team will perform a constructability review of the preferred concept. This review shall identify and assess implementation risks and will consider 1. Cost and funding, 2. Coordination with other agencies, 3. Construction disruption, 4. Right-of-way acquisition, 5. Community acceptance, 6. Utilities, including public and franchise utilities 7. Other items necessary to consider implementation risk. Page 12 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES Til MEM The Halff Team will prepare a Technical Memorandum summarizing the results of the constructability review. D. Public Meeting: If it is deemed prudent, the City may hold a public meeting to present the refined concept plan and obtain community feedback. 1. Power Point Presentation — The Halff Team will develop a Power Point presentation for presentation at a public meeting. 2. Pre -Meetings — The Halff Team and City will hold one meeting prior to the public meeting to work out the goals, agenda, and logistics for the meeting. 3. Halff Team's Role — The Halff Team will prepare the exhibits, handouts, and Power Point presentation for the meeting. The Halff Team may be asked to present or partially present a presentation, and will be available for discussions before and after the meeting. Deliverables • Alternative concept drawings • Power Point presentation • Affected Property list • Opinion of Probable Costs • Constructability Review Technical Memorandum • Summary of Public Meeting Client Responsibility: • Participation in work sessions • Facilitation of coordinating meetings with other entities Number of meetings: • One (1) coordination meeting • Two (2) work sessions • One (1) pre -meeting • One (1) public meeting Task 7: Final Report — The Halff Team shall compile a final report documenting and describing the overall study. The report shall include clear recommendations. Five (5) printed copies of the report will be provided to the city in addition to digital copies A. Executive Summary: The report shall include an Executive Summary that provides a high level summary of the analysis. The emphasis of the Executive Summary shall be the identification of the problem, the formulation of the alternative concepts, the recommended concept plan and the identification of specific areas for acquisition. B Body of Text: The character and extent of the conceptual plans shall be summarized. Much of the body of the report shall be developed by incorporating the interim memoranda/documents as noted as specific deliverables for pertinent tasks. C. Exhibits: Relevant information regarding the study will be presented in a mapping format. This includes general information such as study area as well as more specific information regarding hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, existing and proposed flood LFF Page 13 MCCART-BERRY DETENTION FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF FORT WORTH STUDY SWS-054 SCOPE OF SERVICES HALFF inundation, concept plan layouts, planning information, architectural and landscape concepts, etc. D. Replicating the Study: The final report will include a metrics and suggested approach for replicating the study in other water/pipesheds 1. Issues particular to this study 2. Documentation of decision making process 3. Lessons learned E. Address Comments: The City and PMT will provide reviews of the internal memoranda prepared during the course of the study. Unless requested by City staff the internal memoranda do not require resubmittal, and comments will be addressed in the final report. The final report will be subject to one review by the City and PMT, and the Halff Team will appropriately address comments collated as one set of comments. F. Digital Media: The Halff Team shall provide all models, associated GIS files, exhibits, and narrative in digital media in addition to the hardcopy text of the report. G. Public Involvement and Communication Plan (PICP): The Halff Team will develop a comprehensive PICP for public involvement, outreach and communication to be used in future phases of the study and as recommendations move toward potential design projects. This plan will include but is not limited to the development of both print and digital media regarding the City's flood mitigation efforts, stakeholder outreach and participation (including Hispanic outreach), social media, public meetings, LID demonstration projects. Deliverables • Five (5) printed reports • One (1) PDF copy of the report • Models, associated GIS files, exhibits, and narrative in digital media Client Responsibility: • One (1) review of the report by the City and PMT Number of meetings: • None Page 14 EXHIBIT "A-1" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT A) 2014 Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies SOFTWARE AND DATA FILE STANDARDS The following standards and specifications for hardware, software, file structure, and data format are specified for consistent data management and model development. Any other hardware, software, file structure, and data formats must be compatible with the applications currently used by the City and require the approval of the City. Software: Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2 (32-bit) or later version Office Productivity: Microsoft Office 2003 or later Document Imaging: Adobe Acrobat 7.0 or later GIS Packages ESRI ArcGIS Desktop 9.2 or later GIS Extensions: Spatial Analyst, 3D Analyst Hydrologic Model GIS Preprocessor HEC-GeoHMS 1.1 or later Hydraulic Model GIS Preprocessor: HEC-GeoRAS 4.1 or later Hydrologic Model HEC-HMS 3.0.1 or later Hydraulic Model. HEC-RAS 3.1.3 or later FEMA Preparation Software: CHECK-RAS 1.4, RASPLOT 2.5 or later Others if specified, must be agreed upon by the City InfoWorks SD version 11.0 or later InfoWorks ICM version 2.5 or later XPSWMM 2011 or later Data File Formats: Reports: Reports will be provided in Microsoft Word 2003 format or later, with all images, maps, graphs, tables, etc. embedded in the document so that an exact duplicate of hard copy reports can easily be created. Also, a duplicate PDF version of the report shall be created for archival purposes. Graphs and Tables: Tabular information will be provided in Excel 2003 format (or later) and in Access 2003 database format (or later) when a small database is required. If an enterprise database is deemed necessary, Oracle 91 or later shall be used. ASCII Text Files: All ASCII text files (other than model inputs and outputs) will be encoded using ANSI -encoding and will have the file extension `.TXT" Text files containing comma -delimited information will have the file extension `.CSV" Digital Photographs: All photographs taken for the project will be in digital form, at least 1600 X 1200 resolution, full color, and saved in the EXHIBIT'A-1" Page 1 of 3 JPG file format. Dates and times will be saved in the image, and file names will be descriptive (Le. WMS_XS_20343_US.JPG, not IMG014.JPG). Photos of the channel or cross -sections shall be labeled as to direction of flow. Scanned Documents: Scanned documents will be provided in Adobe PDF format with the entire document appearing in a single file (not individual PDFs for individual pages or for chapters). Bookmarks to chapter beginnings and other important pages will be provided in the PDF. GIS Spatial Data File Formats: All GIS vector data layers (points, lines, polygons, etc.) shall be provided in one of the following three ArcGIS compatible formats: personal or file geodatabase (preferred), shapefile, or coverage. Continuous surface model data (i e. DEMs or DTMs) shall be in ESRI's GRID or TIN format. The City will provide the elevation data for each study area plus a 500 foot buffer in the LIDAR LAS binary file format. Aerial photography or other raster imagery will be provided in a common GIS image format (preferably GeoTIFF), with appropriate header information and a world file for georeferencing. If large amounts of raster images are required for the project, and image catalog will be created and provided to the city. All GIS data, and other files containing coordinates, shall use the State Plane coordinate system set to the Texas North Central (4202) zone. The horizontal datum shall be the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) and the vertical datum shall be the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), both the horizontal and vertical units shall be in feet. All surveyed data shall be captured or converted to grid coordinates. If conversion is required, the surface to grid conversion factor shall also be provided. All GIS datasets shall have the projection defined either internally (geodatabases) or with a projection file (shapefiles). A FGDC compliant metadata file shall be provided for each GIS dataset. This metadata will be compatible with ArcCatalog and saved in XML format. Data accuracy shall be reported and checked using NSSDA standards instead of other older standards like NMAS or ASPRS All submitted data files must not contain any server Zink references to the server network and file folders. File Structure and File Names: All files created in this project will be descriptively named, within the limits of the software. Underscores will be used in place of spaces in file names. File structure should look like the following: EXHIBIT "A-1" Page 2 of 3 r�-j 01_Rep�rt j Correspondence :•_ i Data_Collected j Figures j 1+tisc -2:11:73 Photos LTables 02_Survey j Field_Notes :0 Photos j Spatial_Data Text_Files trr 03_Models Hydraulic_Models Hydrologyplodels 04 Spatial_Data Lj Hydraulic Hydrology 05 Profiles fj3 06 Flood_Maps EXHIBIT 'A-1" Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT "A-2" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT A) FEASIBILITY PLANNING STUDY REPORT FORMAT Table of Contents Task 1. Study Coordination and Management • Task Summary • Meeting(s) Discussion • Coordination with TCU/Berry TOD/Form Based Code Study Task 2 Discovery and Data Collection • Task Summary • Research and Update Stakeholder Database o TAD Information Accuracy Evaluation o Comprehensive Stakeholder Database • Field Reconnaissance o Site Visit Documentation o Special Physical Characteristics • Internal Team Brainstorming o Methodology o Stormwater Control in the Watershed • Revitalization Interdepartmental Meeting o Neighborhood and Infrastructure Revitalization Goals o Discussion of Opportunities, Finding, Etc • Context and Background Information o Data Acquisition o LID Applicability o Hydrologic and Hydraulic Models o Data Synthesis • Subsurface Utility Engineering • System Conditions Assessment (CCTV) Task 3m Existing System Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis • Task Summary • Methodology o Existing ICM Hydraulic Modeling ■ Review of Existing Model • Update of DTM and ICM Terrain Information ■ Update of ICM Models ■ Addition of Zoo Creek Open Channel Modeling EXHIBIT A-2" Page 1 of 5 o Hydrologic Analysis • Development of Rainfall Hyetographs • Addition of Warner Channel and Zoo Creek Hydrology • Results and Conclusions o Existing Conditions Simulations • Hydrologic Results and Comparison ■ Hydraulic Simulation Results • Results Tables o Inundation Mapping • 2D Depth File Development • Development of Inundation Maps o Existing Conditions Assessment ■ Flood Depth Data • Assessment of Flood Hazards • Flood Damage Assessment • Runoff Volume Determination Task 4 Opportunities and Challenges Assessment • Task Summary • Planning Assessment o Watershed Planning -Level Opportunities and Challenges o TCU/Berry TOD and Form Based Code Initiative o Impacts to Study Area • Drainage Feature Assessment o Impacts of LID Strategies o Impacts of Conventional Strategies o Comparison of Strategies • O&M Recommendations Task 5: Identification and Assessment of Potential Features • • • • • • • • Task Summary Storage Volume Evaluation P roposed Scenario Development o Least Aggressive o Moderately Aggressive o Most Aggressive P roposed Scenario Modeling P reliminary LID Modeling Revision of Storage Targets S chematic Concept Plan Development o Concept Layout Plan Development o Planning Level Cost Estimates S election of Preferred Schematic Concept Plan o Screening of Schematic Concept Hans o Decision Matrix Development Guidance on a Go/No-Go Decision EXHIBIT 'A-2" Page 2 of 5 Task 6: Preferred Concept Plan Development • Initial Concept Plan Development o Urban Design Concept o Landscape Architecture Concept • Refinement of Concept Plan o Considerations o Coordination o Affected Properties o Concept Opinions of Probable Cost o Presentation of Refined Concept • Constructability Review • Public Meeting Discussion and Input Task 7: Final Report • Executive Summary • Study Methodology and Findings • Supporting Figures and Appendices • Replicating the Study • Digital Media • Public Involvement and Communications Plan (PICP) APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Figures • Task 1 — Figures o Overall Study Area Map • Task 2 — Figures o Site Visit Photos o System Condition Assessment Locations o Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Locations • Task 3 — Figures o Drainage Area Map ■ Forest Park/Berry, Warner Channel, Zoo Creek Drainage Areas o Overall ICM Model Area o System Inundation Maps o Existing System Storm Sewer and Channel Profiles o Flood Damage Hot Spots • Task 4 — Figures o Location of Potential LID and Conventional Strategies • Task 5 — Figures o Proposed Scenario Development Map(s) o Schematic Concept Plan Drawing(s) • Task 6 — Figures o Urban Design Concept Drawing(s) o Landscape Architecture Concept Drawing(s) o Refined Concept Plan Drawing(s) o Impacted Properties Map EXHIBIT "A-2" Page 3 of 5 APPENDIX B — Supporting Documents • Task 1 — Supporting Documents o Decision Log • Task 2 — Supporting Documents o Updated Database Information o Interdepartmental Revitalization Meeting Notes o LID Applicability Discussion Notes o CCTV Documentation o SUE Documentation • Task 3 — Supporting Documents o Hydrologic Parameter Data Table o Hydrologic Results Table o Hydraulic Results Table ■ 1 D System Results ■ 2D Overland Results o Runoff Volume Calculations • Task 4 — Supporting Documents o Opportunities and Challenges Notes o TOD/Form Based Code Coordination Notes o Comparison of Strategies Table • Task 5 — Supporting Documents o Proposed Scenario Modeling Data and Results Table o Preliminary LID Modeling Results Table o Updated Storage Target Table o Planning Level Cost Estimates o Decision Matrix • Task 6 — Supporting Documents o Affected Properties o Concept Opinions of Probable Cost o Constructability Review Notes o Public Meeting Discussion and Input Notes • PDF of final report APPENDIX C — QA/QC • Task 2 — QA/QC Forms • Task 3 — QA/QC Forms • Task 4 — QA/QC Forms • Task 5 — QA/QC Forms • Task 5 — QA/QC Forms APPENDIX D — Digital Data • Task 2 — Digital Supporting Data o Updated Stakeholder Database o CCTV Digital Information o SUE Digital Information EXHIBIT 'A-2" Page 4 of 5 • • • • Task 3 — Digital Supporting Data o Updated Existing Conditions Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model (ICM) o Spatial Data (Geodatabase) • Updated Existing System Data ■ Existing Inundation Data • Updated Terrain Data o Runoff Volume Calculations o Figures Task 4 — Digital Supporting Data o LID Strategy Calculations o Conventional Strategy Calculations o Figures Task 5 — Digital Supporting Data o Proposed Scenario Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model (ICM) o LID Modeling o Spatial Data (Geodatabase) ■ Proposed System Data ■ Proposed Inundation Data ■ Proposed Terrain Data o Figures o Schematic Concept Plan Drawing(s) o Cost Estimates o Decision Matrix Task 6 — Digital Supporting Data o Figures o Urban Design Concept Drawing(s) o Landscape Architecture Concept Drawing(s) o Refined Concept Plan Drawing(s) o Cost Estimates EXHIBIT "A-2" Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT "B" FY2014 Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. The Engineer shall be compensated a total project fee of $438,000. Payment of the total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment "A' for all labor materials supplies and equipment necessary to complete the project. B The Engineer shall be paid in accordance with ' Exhibit B-1", Supplement to Attachment B Each invoice from the Engineer shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this contract by an officer of the Engineer. C. Additional Tasks that may be assigned, not currently included in the Scope, may be billed and paid on an hourly basis for actual hours worked and expenses incurred at an hourly billing rate as provided in Exhibit "B-2". No additional Tasks will be performed without prior written authorization from the City. D. Professional Services Fee summary is provided in Exhibit "B-3". E Total project fees including MWBE participation is provided in Exhibit "B-3A". I. Schedule The intent of the schedule is to complete the effort described in Attachment "A" and amended in Attachment "C-1" and deliver a final report within 470 calendar days after the "Notice to Proceed" letter is issued. A. A technical memorandum detailing the data collection (Task 2) and existing conditions model development and assessment (Task 3) will be submitted within 70 calendar days after the study kickoff meeting. B. A technical memorandum discussing opportunities in the watershed for LID as well as conventional flood reduction strategies (Task 4) will be submitted within 72 calendar days after existing conditions technical memorandum. C. A technical memorandum detailing the proposed solutions, associated costs, and recommendations for a go/no-go on the study (Task 5) will be submitted within 182 calendar days after the opportunities and challenges memorandum. D. If the study proceeds a final report detailing the preferred concept plan, constructability, estimated costs and other elements will be submitted 146 calendar days after the proposed solutions technical memorandum. ATTACHMENT'S Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "B-1" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B) FY 2014 Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies METHOD OF PAYMENT & PROGRESS REPORT REQUIREMENTS I. Method of Payment P artial payment shall be made to the Engineer monthly upon City's approval of an invoice from the Engineer outlining the current labor and expenses of the total project The aggregate of such monthly partial fee payments shall not exceed the following: U ntil delivery of the data collection and existing conditions assessment technical memorandum (Task 2 and 3), a sum not to exceed 40 percent of the total lump sum fee. U ntil delivery of the opportunities and challenges technical memorandum (Task 4), a sum not to exceed 60 percent of the total lump sum fee. U ntil delivery of the proposed solutions and go/no go recommendations technical memorandum (Task 5), a sum not to exceed 75 percent of the total lump sum fee. The balance of fees, less previous payments, shall be payable after delivery of the FINAL report and electronic files. II. Progress Reports A. The Engineer shall submit to the designated representative of the Director of the Department of Transportation/Public Works monthly progress reports covering all phases of the analysis in the format required by the City. B. Periodic reports concerning MWBE participation shall be submitted as required by the MWBE Office. EXHIBIT "B-1" Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "B-2" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B) FY2014 Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies HOURLY RATE SCHEDULES A summary of current hourly billing rates is provided below: Principal -in -Charge P roject Manager S enior Professional Engineer Junior Professional Engineer Engineer -in -Training S r. GIS Jr. GIS P lanner Landscape Architect Graphics Engineering Intern CADD Technician Clerical $230 — $300 $150 — $205 $130 — $160 $105 — $130 $85 — $105 $100 — $170 $55 — $100 $62 — $175 $62 — $175 $80 — $145 $45 — $65 $40 — $98 $43 — $92 EXHIBIT 'B-2" Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "B-3" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B) FY2014 Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE SUMMARY TASK Task 1: Study Coordination and Management Task 2: Discovery Task 2: Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Task 2: System Condition Assessment (CCTV) Task 3: Existing System Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Task 4: Opportunities and Challenges Assessment Task 5: Identification and Assessment of Potential Features Task 6: Preferred Concept Plan Development Task 7: Final Report Task 7: Public Involvement and Communications Plan (PICP) SERVICE TOTAL FEE $25,000 $36,100 $27,500 $26,400 $65,000 $48,000 $90,000 $86,000 $24,100 $9,900 $438,000 EXHIBIT "B-3" Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "B-3A" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B) FY2014 Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies SUMMARY OF TOTAL PROJECT FEES Consulting Firm Prime Responsibility Amount Percent PRIME ENGINEERPHALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. Study Management, Discovery Existing Conditions Analysis, Improvement Concept Development $344,250 78.6% S UB ENGINEER* RIOS GROUP S ubsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) $25,000 5.7% S UB ENGINEER• DFW INFRASTRUCTURE, INC S torm Sewer Condition Assessment $24,000 5.5% S UB ENGINEER• OPEN CHANNELS GROUP P ublic Outreach and Communications $16,500 3.8% S UB ENGINEER* WATEARTH, INC. LID and Water Quality Consulting $11,750 2 7% S UB ENGINEER* FOUAD JABER LID and Water Quality Consulting $8,000 1.8% S UB ENGINEER• CODE STUDIO Consulting and Coordination with the $8,500 1.9% TOD Form Based Code Study otal for Professional Services $438,000 100.0% EXHIBIT "B-3A" Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "B-3A" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B) FY2013 Stormwater Feasibility Planning Studies SUMMARY OF TOTAL PROJECT FEES Project Description Scope of Services Total Fee The Rios Group DFW Infrastructure, Inc. Open Channels Group $438,000 $438, 000 $438,000 M/WBE Fee $25,000 $24,000 $16,500 Percent 5.7% 5.5% 3.8% SUB ENGINEER shall participate in performing portions of the following Tasks as outlined in Attachment "A" Task 2. Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) — The Rios Group Task 2. System Condition Assessment (CCTV) — DFW Infrastructure, Inc. Task 7. Public involvement and Communications Plan (PICP) — Open Channels Group General Consulting (Multiple Tasks) Non-MWBE Participation Watearth, Inc. Fouad Jaber CODE Studio $438,000 $438,000 $438,000 $11 750 $8,000 $8,500 2.7% 1.8% 1.9% SUB ENGINEER shall participate in performing portions of the following Tasks as outlined in Attachment "A" Task 2,4,5,6. LID and Water Quality Consulting — Watearth Fouad Jaber Task 2,4,6. TOD and Form Based Code Consulting — CODE Studio EXHIBIT "B-3A" Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "B-4" (SUPPLEMENT TO ATTACHMENT B) MCCART-BERRY FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY STUDY NO SWS-054 LEVEL OF EFFORT AND FEE ESTIMATE Study Phases and Tasks PHASE ONE Task 1: Study Coordination and Management Meetings and Coordination Overall Project Management Kickoff Meeting (1) Coordination with TCU/Berry TOD Study (2 meetings) Attendance of TCU/Berry TOD Study Charrette (2 days) Schedule and Monthly Progress Report Baseline Schedule Development Bi-Monthly Progress Report (18mo.) Bi-Monthly Study Schedule Update (18 mo.) Invoice and MWBE report (18 mo.) Subtotal Task 1 Task 2: Discovery Research/update Stakeholder Database Open Channels Site Visit with City and PMT (1 day) Internal Team Brainstorming (4 hours) Walker participation Jaber participation CODE Studio participation Revitalization Inter -Departmental Meeting Context and Background Information Data Acquisition LID Applicability for Forest Park -Berry Walker participation Jaber participation Hydrologic and Hydraulic Models Data Synthesis Field Reconnaissance Walker participation Jaber participation GIS data organization Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) (Rios Group) System Assessment (DFW Infrastructure) Subtotal Task 2 1 1 $255.00 4 2 2 4 18 6 8 16 8 9 9 9 83 2 8 6 5 2 4 2 6 35 1 1 $147.00 18 4 8 8 38 8 4 4 4 4 4 28 1 1 $121.00 4 8 12 8 4 4 4 4 8 4 36 1 $97.00 8 4 1 c ea a $94.00 4 4 8 6 4 4 8 6 2 $86.00 4 4 6 1 1 $167.00 4 4 12 0 $67.00 8 4 24 12 1 38 6 1 20 1 36 1 (9 $106.00 1 $62.00 2 9 9 18 38 2 4 2 1 1 Fee Subtotal $5,562 $3,398 $3,440 $2, 592 $2,472 $2,016 $2,016 $2,574 $24,070 I $1,528 $4,192 $4, 268 $2,506 $2,244 $1,720 $3,408 $2,996 $3,800 $261662 I Subconsultant $3,000 $1,000 $500 $500 $1,000 $750 $1,000 $750 $25,000 $24,000 $57,500 $300 $100 $50 $50 $100 $75 $100 $75 $2,500 $2,400 $5,750 I 1 1 1 1 Fee Subtotal $3, 300 $1,100 $550 $550 $1,100 $825 $1,100 $825 $27,500 $26,400 $63,250 I 1 1 Direct Costs $1,000 $75 $150 $1,225 $75 $75 $75 $150 $375 I 26-JuI-13 $6,562 3,473 $3,440, $2,742 $2,472. $2,016 $2,016 $2,574_ $25,295 3,3.00 4267. 4-343'. 244 720; 1 100, $823 0 408_ $.3,146 $1;100 $3,800 $27,500 $26,400 $90,287 I:\1008-13\9017-ForestPark-Berry1Contract Documents120140321\SWS054_Exhibit B-4_McCart-Berry Detention Study-Budget-20130801.xlsx MCCART-BERRY FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY STUDY NO. SWS-054 LEVEL OF EFFORT AND FEE ESTIMATE Study Phases and Tasks Task 3: Existing Conditions Hydrology and Hydraulics Existing InfoWorks ICM Model Obtain and Review Existing ICM Model Update DTM and IW Ground Model with Survey Update ICM Model NodeslLinks with FW GIS Data Add Zoo Creek River Sections to ICM Model Hydrology Existing Conditions ICM Simulations Existing Condition Inundation Maps Existing Condition Assessment Update Flood Depth Grids Assess Flood Hazards Update Flood Damage Assessment Runoff Volume Determination Interim Drainage Assessment Work Session Subtotal Task 3 Task 4: Opportunities and Challenges Assessments Internal Meeting Walker participation Jaber participation Planning Assessment Consulting with CODE Studio Drainage Feature Assessment Walker participation Jaber participation O&M Recommendations Walker participation Jaber participation Work Session with City and PMT Investigate Alternative Funding Sources Subtotal Task 4 d sC rn d a A o c U >` v 0 a $255.00 $162.00 4 10 2 2 4 6 14 6 24 8 2 2 6 $147:00 $121.00 10 4 8 20 4 8 6 4 4 4 8 4 84 4 4 24 4 4 40 4 4 2 6 4 60 4 24 4 4 $97.00 20 8 60 160 16 26 20 8 12 16 40 4 390 4 16 C co a $94.00 6 6 6 36 24 6 cn 0 0 .0 n $86.00 $167.00 6 16 16 4 14 1 48 1 40 1 36 20 1 72 1 42 4 4 8 Junior GIS $67.00 40 8 48 co 0 et. co U` $106.00 24 0 co Administrative t 0 O. $62.00 2 2 2 Fee Subtotal $3,410 $4,712 $6,996 $23,300 $2,624 $4,182 $3,388 $2,568 $1,752 $2,464 $6,430 $2,996 $64,822 $4,656 $11,316 $5,516 $8,308 $1,740 $2,732 $2,550 24 1 6 I $36,818 Subconsultant $1,000 $1,000 $4,000 $500 $500 $1,000 $500 $1 ,500 c c to o Tos c N c c :6 0 o O .0 0 to U $100 $100 $400 $50 $50 $100 $50 $150 $1,000 1 ) Fee Subtotal $1,100 $1,100 $4,400 $550 $550 $1,100 $550 $1,650 $11,000 Direct Costs $75 $75 $150 -$4,712_. 6,996 1$23,300 $2;624` $4,182- 3,388 2,668 1;752 ;464 6;430. 071. $64,897 $47,968 I:\1008-13\9017-ForestPark-Berry\Contract Documents\20140321\SWS054_Exhibit B-4_McCart-Berry Detention Study-Budget-20130801.xlsx MCCART-BERRY FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY STUDY NO SWS-054 LEVEL OF EFFORT AND FEE ESTIMATE Study Phases and Tasks Task 5: Identification and Assessment of Potential Features Storage Volume Evaluation Walker participation Jaber participation Volume Evaluation Work Session (1) Proposed Scenario Development Least Aggressive Scenario Moderately Aggressive Scenario Most Aggrerssive Scenario Proposed Scenario Modeling Preliminary LID Modeling Walker participation Jaber participation Revision of Storage Targets & Detention Feature Locations Work Session with City and PMT Schematic Concept Plan Development (3 total) Concept Layout Plans Walker participation Jaber participation Open Channels participation Planning Level Cost Estimates Selection of Preferred Schematic Concepts (1) Decision Making Matrix Work Session with City and PMT Subtotal Task 5 Phase -ONE Subtotals c CO u o, U c U 0 d 0) 5 65 c • c d 'c C •'- c w $255.00 $162.00 $147.00 $121.00 $97.00 4 4 24.. 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 6 24 4 6 4 6 12 4 6 6 6 24 8 4 4 8 4 6 4 4 100 12 4 6 6 6 16 16 8 4 8 4 6 4 4 104 24 4 12 12 12 60 16 16 6 16 6 4 188 03 c a $94.00 16 16 16 6 40 16 6 8 6 130 $86.00 48 16 64 $167.00 $67.00 $106.00 40 I 40 64 v O L. O • v 0. N C U E co v a $62.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Fee Subtotal $5, 544 $2,556 $5,048 $5,048 $5,048 $11,608 $4,988 $3,432 $4,334 $18,160 $6,276 $3,726 $2,596 $2,996 Subconsultant $500 $500 $3,000 $1,000 $750 $500 $1 000 14 $81,360 I $7,250 233,732. ;,$ 74 750` c c CO O • c0 C :p 0 U 0 .a o U $50 $50 $300 $100 $75 $50 $100 $725 Fee Subtotal $550 $550 $3,300 $1,100 $825 $550 $1,100 $7,975 :7,475 _$ 82225 Direct Costs $75 $75 $75 $5,544 $550 $550 $2,631 $5,048; $51048. $11,608 '$4,988. :$3,300 ;100. 432- 4;409 8,1601 $825 =.$550 `$1100 $2,696; $3;071: $225 $89,560 2,050 $ 318,007 I:\1008-13\9017-ForestPark-Berry\Contract Documents\20140321\SWS054_Exhibit B-4_McCart-Berry Detention Study-Budget-20130801.xlsx MCCART-BERRY FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY STUDY NO. SWS-054 LEVEL OF EFFORT AND FEE ESTIMATE Study Phases and Tasks PHASE TWO $255.00 Task 6: Preferred Concept Plan Development Initial Urban Design and Landscape Architectural Concepts (2) Consulting with CODE Studio Conculting with Watearth Consulting with Fouad Consulting with Open Channels Work Session with City and PMT Refine preferred Urban Design and Landscape Architectural Concepts (1 total) Considerations and Presenting Preferred Plans at W/S Consulting with CODE Studio Conculting with Watearth Consulting with Fouad Consulting with Open Channels Coordination meeting with other entities Opinions of Probable Costs Constructability Review Public Meeting (At City's Request) Prepare Power Point Presentation Subtotal Task 9 Task 7: Final Report Report Writing and Preparation Finalization of Study Exhibits Address All Comments from Internal Memoranda Executive Summary Printing, Binding and Final Documentation Preparation for 5 Copies Digital Submittal Public Involvement and Communication Plan (PICP) Open Channels to prepare PICP Subtotal Task 10 Phase ITWO subtotals 4 4 1 I Study Manager $162.00 30 6 4 6 16 2 2 4 8 12 12 4 106 24 2 4 2 1 4 37 143 1 To c a'O N c o• c c w a $147.00 $121.00 I I 10 5 4 2 6 6 4 4 2 4 3 3 8 8 12 16 8 8 2 53 1 62 16 12 2 4 4 4 2 2 8 32 85 I $97.00 16 16 4 8 2 8 c a $94.00 40 16 6 24 8 8 8 8 118 16 4 4 $86.00 56 4 16 6 24 4 8 24 32 8 182 8 8 4 Junior GIS $67.00 $106.00 1 1 cu >> N% t O U N o- `m:E U'EC'n 4 $62.00 Fee Subtotal Subconsultant 22 1 22 1 24 1 20 I 84 I 38 . 142. I . 202 1 4 8 8 12. _. 60 24 16 8 2 2 2 2 8 2 $21,871 $3,304 $2,266 $3,784 $10,652 $1,662 $1,496 $1,576 $6,380 $10,700 $7,988 $1,914 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $1,000 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $1,000 108 4 4 18 4 2 16 1 $73,593.1 $11,000 $111964 $2,990 $2,758 $1,236 $992 $2,650 $648 $9,000 8 116 22 $23,238 40 $96,831 $330 563 c c :a o m • c :a 0 u o .0 o • v CO $200 $150 $100 $100 $200 $150 $200 $100 $1,200 1 $900 Fee Subtotal $2,200 $1,650 $1,100 $1,100 $2,200 $1,650 $1,200 $1,100 $12,200 $9,900 $9,000 $900 1 $9,900 $20,000 $21100 I $22,100 $94,750 $9 575 ) Direct Costs $75 $75 $75 $150 . $375 $750 $750 $1,125 0 v Y `$21,871 $5,504 $1,650 ;..`: $3,366 3,1359 10;727 $3,862, 1650 2,696 1,100 651: 6380; '$10;790 ,136 1;96-4'' $86,168 $11;64 $2,990. $2,758'; 31,2* $1,742 $2,650 $648° $9,900. $33,888 $120,056. I:\1008-13\9017-ForestPark-Berry\Contract Documents\20140321\SWS054_Exhibit B 4_McCart-Berry Detention Study-Budget-20130801.xlsx ID 3 Task Name 1 Study Coordination & Management Duration 426 days? 1.1 Kick -Off Meeting 0 days 1.2 Ongoing Study Coord. & Managemer346 days 4 1.3 Bi-Monthly Study Meetings 13 1.4 Coordination with TOD 14 1.4.1 Charette 15 1.4.2 Build -Out Scenarios 16 1.4.3 FPB Schematic Concept 17 2 Discovery 18 2.1 Research Stakeholder Database 19 2.2 Site Visit 20 2.3 Internal Team Brainstorming 21 2.4 Revitalization Interdepart. Meeting 22 2.5 Context Background Info 23 2.5.1 Data Acquisition 24 2.5.2 LID Applicability 25 2.5.3 H&H Models (Provided by City) 26 2.5.4 Data Synthesis 27 2.5.5 Organize Collected Data 28 2.5.6 Technical Memo 29 2.6 SUE 30 2.7 Systems Conditions Assessment 31 3 Existing Conditions H&H 32 3.1 Apply Existing ICM Model 33 3.2 Hydrology 34 3.3 Existing Conditions ICM 35 3.4 Existing Conditions Inundation Maps 36 3.5 Existing Conditions Assessment 37 3.6 Technical Memo 38 3.7 Interim Drainage Assess. Meeting _39 4 Opportunities & Challenges 40 4.1 Internal Meeting 41 4.2 Planning Assessment 42 4.3 Drainage Feature Assessment 43 4.4 O&M Recommendations 44 4.5 Technical Memo 45 4.6 City and PMT Work session 46 5 Identify and Assess of Potential Features 47 5.1 Storage Volume Evaluation 48 5.2 City and PMT Work session 49 5.3 Proposed Scenario Development 50 5.3.1 Least Aggressive 51 5.3.2 Moderate Aggressive 52 5.3.3 Most Aggressive 53 5.4 Proposed Scenario Modeling 54 5.5 Preliminary LID Modeling 55 5.6 Storage Targets and Detention Rev 56 5.7 City and PMT Work session 57 5.8 Schematic Concept Plan Dev 58 5.8.1 Rough Layout Plan 59 5.8.2 Planning Level Cost Estimate Project: FPB_ Schedule_v3 Date: Wed 3/26/14 FORT WORTH Task 256 days? 140 days 0 days 0 days 0 days 25 days? 20 days 5 days 5 days 5 days 25 days 15 days 15 days 5 days 15 days 10 days 10 days 1 day? 1 day? 46 days 10 days 10 days 20 days 5 days 5 days 10 days 0 days 48 days 0 days 15 days 20 days 15 days 15 days 0 days 125 days 15 days 0 days 15 days 15 days 15 days 15 days 15 days 15 days 15 days 0 days 25 days 15 days 15 days Start Wed 12/11/13 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Wed 12/11/13 Tue 7/1/14 Tue 7/1/14 Thu 10/2/14 Fri 1/16/15 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/14/14 Mon 4/21/14 Mon 4/21/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/14/14 Mon 4/28/14 Mon 4/28/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/14/14 Mon 4/14/14 Mon 4/14/14 Mon 4/28/14 Mon 5/26/14 Mon 6/2/14 Mon 6/2/14 Mon 6/16/14 Mon 7/7/14 Mon 7/7/14 Fri 7/11/14 Fri 7/18/14 Fri 7/25/14 Fri 8/8/14 Thu 9/11/14 Fri 9/19/14 Fri 9/19/14 Thu 10/16/14 Fri 10/17/14 Fri 10/17/14 Fri 10/17/14 Fri 10/17/14 Fri 11/7/14 Fri 11/7/14 Fri 11/7/14 Mon 12/8/14 Tue 12/9/14 Tue 12/9/14 Tue 12/23/14 Split Finish Fri 8/7/15 Mon 4/7/14 Fri 8/7/15 Wed 12/10/14 Fri 1/16/15 Tue 7/1/14 Thu 10/2/14 Fri 1/16/15 Fri 5/9/14 Fri 5/2/14 Fri 4/18/14 Fri 4/25/14 Fri 4/25/14 Fri 5/9/14 Fri 4/25/14 Fri 4/25/14 Fri 4/11/14 Fri 5/2/14 Fri 5/9/14 Fri 5/9/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 6/16/14 Fri 4/25/14 Fri 4/25/14 Fri 5/23/14 Fri 5/30/14 Fri 6/6/14 Fri 6/13/14 Mon 6/16/14 Thu 9/11/14 Mon 7/7/14 Thu 7/31/14 Thu 8/14/14 Thu 8/14/14 Thu 8/28/14 Thu 9/11/14 Wed 3/18/15 Thu 10/9/14 Thu 10/16/14 Thu 11/6/14 Thu 11/6/14 Thu 11/6/14 Thu 11/6/14 Mon 12/1/14 Mon 12/1/14 Mon 12/1/14 Mon 12/8/14 Wed 1/14/15 Wed 12/31/14 Wed 1/14/15 NCTCOG North Central Texas Council of Governments ■ Predecessors 2 38FS+20 days 91 59FS+2 days 19 2055 235S 23S5 25 21 27FF 25 25 33 34 35 36FS-5 days 37FS+1 day 14FS+5 days 40FS+3 days 4155+5 days 4255+5 days 43FS-5 days 44F5+10 days 45F5+5 days 47FS+5 days 48 48 48 49 49 49 55F5+5 days 56 SBFS-5 days Milestone ■ ■ 2014 Qtr 1L 2014 . Jan 1 Feb I Mar HALFF Qtr 2, 2014 Apr Qtr 3, 2014 Jul I Y fn."' 7/1 14 Aug Sep f l 4 Qtr 4, 2014 Oct 1 Nov 1 1 lit 10/2 i 1 l Dec 2015 Qtr 1,2015 Jan Feb Mar 1/16 e-i61 Summary CODE STUDIO Deadline la i 1 ti Progress r iiid I 1 Shan 11 12/8 Qtr 2, 2015 Apr T May-1 Y 1 Page 1 ID Task Name Duration 60 5.9 Preferred Concept Selection 61 5.9.1 Screening 62 5.9.2 Decision Making Matrix 63 5.9.3 City and PMT Work session 64 5.10 Guidance on Go -No -Go Decision 65 5.11 Technical Memo 66 6 Preferred Concept Plan 67 6.1 Initial Urban Design & LA Concept 68 6.2 City and PMT Work session 69 6.3 Concept Refinement 70 6.4 Coordination Meeting 71 6.5 City and PMT Work session 72 6.6 Constructability Review 73 6.7 Memo 74 7 Final Report 75 7.1 PICP 76 7.2 Report Writing 77 7.3 Executive Summary 78 7.4 Report Review 79 7.5 Final Report 80 20 days 15 days 10 days 0 days 10 days 5 days 70 days 20 days O days 20 days 0 days 0 days 10 days 5 days 25 days 25 days 25 days 25 days 25 days 25 days 81 8 TOD Form Based Code Coordination 248 days? 82 8.1 Initial Review and Analysis 1 day? 83 8.1.1 Staff & Stakeholder Interviews 1 day? 84 8.1.2 GIS & Site Analysis 1 day? 85 8.1.3 Website & Other Outreach 1 day? 86 8.2 Public Design Process 20 days 87 8.2.1 Background Maps 15 days 88 8.2.2 TOD Charette 5 days 89 8.3 TOD Plan 182 days? 90 8.3.1 Build -out Scenarios (Min and Mi6O days 91 8.3.2 Build -out Scenarios Coordinatior0 days 92 8.3.3 Transportation Infrastruct. Needl day? 93 8.3.4 FPB Schematic Concept 0 days Coordination 94 8.3.5 Stormwater Management 1 day? Opportunities 8.3.6 Utility/Other Infrastructure Nee(1 day? 8.3.7 Detailed TOD Development Plan 1 day? 8.3.8 Implementation Plan 1 day? 95 96 97_� Project: FPB_Schedule_v3 Date: Wed 3/26/14 FORT WORTH Task Start Thu 1/15/15 Thu 1/15/15 Thu 1/22/15 Wed 2/11/15 Thu 2/26/15 Thu 3/12/15 Thu 3/19/15 Thu 3/19/15 Wed 4/22/15 Thu 4/23/15 Wed 5/27/15 Wed 6/3/15 Thu 6/4/15 Thu 6/18/15 Thu 7/2/15 Thu 7/2/15 Thu 7/2/15 Thu 7/2/15 Thu 7/2/15 Thu 7/2/15 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Tue 6/10/14 Tue 6/10/14 Tue 7/1/14 Tue 7/8/14 Tue 7/8/14 Mon 9/29/14 Tue 9/30/14 Fri 1/16/15 Thu 3/19/15 Fri 3/20/15 Mon 3/23/15 Tue 3/24/15 a Split Finish Wed 2/11/15 Wed 2/4/15 Wed 2/4/15 Wed 2/11/15 Wed 3/11/15 Wed 3/18/15 Wed 6/24/15 Wed 4/15/15 Wed 4/22/15 Wed 5/20/15 Wed 5/27/15 Wed 6/3/15 Wed 6/17/15 Wed 6/24/15 Wed 8/5/15 Wed 8/5/15 Wed 8/5/15 Wed 8/5/15 Wed 8/5/15 Wed 8/5/15 Tue 3/24/15 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 4/7/14 Mon 7/7/14 Tue 7/1/14 Mon 7/7/14 Tue 3/24/15 Mon 9/29/14 Mon 9/29/14 Tue 9/30/14 Fri 1/16/15 Thu 3/19/15 Fri 3/20/15 Mon 3/23/15 Tue 3/24/15 NCTCOG North Central Texas Council of Governments Predecessors 2014 Qtri,2014 Jan J 59 61FS-10 days 62FS+5 days 63FS+10 days 64 65 67FS+5 days 68 69FS+5 days 70FS+5 days 71 72 73FS+5 days 73FS+5 days 73FS+5 days 73FS+5 days 73FS+5 days 88SF 38F5+10 days 88 90 91 59FS+2 days 65 94 95 96 Milestone ri Feb Mar Qtr 2, 2014 Apr 1 May HALFF' 1 Summary 1 I MI { 1 CODE STUDIO Jun Qtr 3, 2014 L Aug Sep Jul rrhii Deadline lr Nov 2015 Qtr 1, 2015 Qtr 2,2015 1 Dec _ Jan i Feb 1 Mar Apr 1 May it...mb Progress 3/412/11 Page 2 TCU Campus COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (2010) Heavy Industrial Infrastructure Institutional Low Density Residential Light Industrial Mixed -Use General Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Public - Parks Single Family Residential [campus FORT WORTH ATTACHMENT E: FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY AREA MAP MCCART/BERRY FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY City of Fort Worth Prospect No. 13-9017 April 2014 Notes: 1) Aerial imagery for Fort Worth, TX provided by Bing Maps. For more about using Bing Maps in ArcGIS please see: www.esri.com/software/ arcgis/arcgisonline/bing-maps.html LEGEND Project Boundary Future Station Area Urban Village Berry Street Initiative - FP/B Watershed S . Be 0 395 790 1,580 Feet 1 inch = 500 feet HALFF HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. 4000 FOSSIL CREEK BLVD. FORT WORTH, TX 76137-2720 WWW.HALFF.COM FORT WORTH ATTACHMENT E: FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY AREA MAP MCCART/BERRY FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY City of Fort Worth Prospect No. 13-9017 April 2014 Notes: 1) Aerial imagery for Fort Worth, TX provided by Bing Maps. For more about using Bing Maps in ArcGIS please see: www.esri.com/software/ arcgis/arcgisonline/bing-maps.html LEGEND Project Boundary Future Station Area Urban Village Berry Street Initiative - FP/B Watershed S . Be 0 395 790 1,580 Feet 1 inch = 500 feet HALFF HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. 4000 FOSSIL CREEK BLVD. FORT WORTH, TX 76137-2720 WWW.HALFF.COM " HALFF ■3 ■ August 2, 2013 AVO 1008-13-9017 Ms. Kimberly Sims Vice President Open Channels Group 101 Summit Ave, Suite 208 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Re: Forest Park/Berry Neighborhood Detention Feasibility Study (SWS-054) Kimberly, Halff Associates, Inc. intends to contract with Open Channels Group, Inc. for MWBE services on the subject City of Fort Worth study. Halff Associates, Inc. intends to contract $16,500 to your firm for development of a public outreach and involvement plan as research and updates to the City s Stakeholder Database during the course of the study. Please acknowledge this commitment by signing below and returning an original to me. Sincerely, HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. ancoi J. de Kock, AICP, ASLA, RLA, LEED AP Study Man_+er Kimt: er im , ViceTre—Prent Open Chann&ls Group HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC, 4000 FOSSIL CREEK BLVD TEL (817) 047-1422 `NW W HALFF.COM FORT WORTH, TX 76137 FAX (817) 232-9784 Date Zot August 2, 2013 AVO 1008-13-9017 Jeffrey K. Vick Director of Operations The Rios Group 7524 Jack Newell Blvd. South. Fort Worth, TX 76118 Re: Forest Park/Berry Neighborhood Detention Feasibility Study (SWS-054) Jeffrey, Halff Associates, Inc. intends to contract with Rios Group for MWBE services on the subject City of Fort Worth study. Halff Associates, Inc. proposes to contract $25,000 to your firm for Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) during the course of the study. Please acknowledge this commitment by signing below and returning an original to me. Sincerely, HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. ,P ancoi. J, de Kock, AICP, ASLA, RLA, LEED AP --Study_ anager Je r:�, ick pirector of Operations Date Th Rios Group HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. T,a?{761.37 LEH LER LFF August 2, 2013 AVO 1008-13-8892 Donna M. Brown President DEW Infrastructure, Inc. 4913 Briar Patch Lane Burleson, TX 76028 Re: Forest Park/Berry Neighborhood Detention Feasibility Study (SWS-054) Donna, Halff Associates, Inc. intends to contract with DFW Infrastructure, Inc. for MWBE services on the subject City of Fort Worth study Raiff Associates, Inc. proposes to contract $24 000 to your firm for System Condition Assessment (CCTV) during the course of the study. Please acknowledge this commitment by signing below and returning an original to me. Sincerely, HALFF ASSOCIATES, INC. Francois/J. de Kock, AICP, ASLA, RLA, LEED AP Study Manager 15onna M. Brown resider* DFW Infrastructure, Inc. HALFF ASSOCIATES, $NC. 4000 FOSSIL CREEK BLVD TEL (817) 847-1422 WWW.HALFFCOM FORT WORTri. TX 76137 FAX (817) 232-R784 E,21:2) Date M&C Ref, iew I DATE• CODE: SUBJECT: COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 10/15/2013 10/15/2013 C Page 1 of 2 Official site of the City of Fort Worth, Texas FORT WORT! I LOG NAME• 20SWMFPBDETENTION HEARING: Authorize Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Halff Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $438,000.00 for the Berry-McCart Flood Control Assessment (COUNCIL DISTRICT 9) REFERENCE NO.: TYPE: **C-26501 CONSENT PUBLIC NO RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Halff Associates, Inc., in the amount of $438,000.00 for the Berry-McCart Flood Control Assessment DISCUSSION: This Agreement will determine techniques for flood reduction in this neighborhood by means of open space corridors stream restoration and surface detention in floodprone areas. The results of this effort will be used to coordinate with anticipated redevelopment in the area, neighborhood street projects being considered for the 2014 Capital Improvements Program (CIP), and other future infrastructure projects. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was published in the Fort Worth Star -Telegram for services on November 17, 2011 and December 1, 2011. Ten consultants responded and the top four consultants were interviewed. Halff Associates, Inc., was selected as the most qualified consultant for this work. Halff Associates Inc., proposes to perform the scope of work for this contract for a lump -sum fee in the amount of $438,000.00. M/WBE Office - Halff Associates, Inc., is in compliance with the City's BDE Ordinance by committing to 15 percent SBE participation on this project. The City's SBE goal for this project is 15 percent. This Stormwater Master Plan study area is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 9, Mapsco 76X. FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current operating budget, as appropriated, of the Stormwater Utility Fund TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers PE69 531200 0209202 $438,000.00 Submitted for City Manager's Office bv: Fernando Costa (6122) Originating Department Head: Douglas W. Wiersig (7801) Additional Information Contact: http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/me jeview.asp?ID=1 8 8 5 8&councildate=1 0/15/2013 4/15/2014 M&C Review Page 2 of 2 Steven E Eubanks (7857) ATTACHMENTS SWS-054 FPB detention 2.pdf http://apps.cfwnet.org/council_packet/me Jeviewasp?ID=1 8 85 8&couneildate-1 0/1 5/2013 4/15/2014