HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 45237 (2)1
1 ;
r
1
CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING RELATED DESIGN SERVICES
This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a Texas home -rule municipality
(the "CITY"), and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., authorized to do business in Texas, (the
"ENGINEER"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape
Improvements.
Article
Scope of Services
A. The Scope of Services is set forth in Attachment A.
Article II
Compensation
A. The ENG I N EER's compensation is set forth in Attachment B.
Article III
Terms of Payment
Payments to the ENGINEER will be made as follows:
A. Invoice and Payment
(1) The Engineer shall provide the City sufficient documentation, including but not
limited to meeting the requirements set forth in Attachment D to this
AGREEMENT, to reasonably substantiate the invoices.
(2) The ENGINEER will issue monthly invoices for all work performed under this
AGREEMENT. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days of receipt.
(3) Upon completion of services enumerated in Article I, the final payment of any
balance will be due within 30 days of receipt of the final invoice.
(4) In the event of a disputed or contested billing, only that portion so contested will
be withheld from payment, and the undisputed portion will be paid. The CITY
will exercise reasonableness in contesting any bill or portion thereof. No
interest will accrue on any contested portion of the billing until mutually
resolved.
(5)
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 1 of 14
If the CITY fails to make payment in full to ENGINEER for billings contested in
good faith within 60 days of the amount due, the ENGINEER may, after givinc
7 days' written notice to CITY, suspend services under this AGREEMENT unti
1 OFF# 1 L ,
r
CITY
1 Rai VicialiThiNTX
11_09_
paid in full. In the event of suspension of services, the ENGINEER shall have
no liability to CITY for delays or damages caused the CITY because of such
suspension of services.
Article IV
Obligations of the Engineer
Amendments to Article IV, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. General
The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering
representative under this Agreement, providing professional engineering
consultation and advice and furnishing customary services incidental thereto.
B Standard of Care
The standard of care applicable to the ENGINEER's services will be the degree
of skill and diligence normally employed in the State of Texas by professional
engineers or consultants performing the same or similar services at the time
such services are performed.
C. Subsurface Investigations
(1) The ENGINEER shall advise the CITY with regard to the necessity for
subcontract work such as special surveys, tests, test borings or other
subsurface investigations in connection with design and engineering
work to be performed hereunder. The ENGINEER shall also advise the
CITY concerning the results of same. Such surveys, tests, and
investigations shall be furnished by the CITY, unless otherwise specified
in Attachment A.
(2) In soils foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface investigations,
the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test
points and sample intervals and at locations other than where
observations, exploration, and investigations have been made Because
of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or
unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect the
total PROJECT cost and/or execution These conditions and
cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of the ENGINEER
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 2 of 14
D Preparation of Engineering Drawings
The ENGINEER will provide to the CITY the original drawings of all plans in ink
on reproducible mylar sheets and electronic files in .pdf format, or as otherwise
approved by CITY, which shall become the property of the CITY. CITY may
use such drawings in any manner it desires; provided, however, that the
ENGINEER shall not be liable for the use of such drawings for any project other
than the PROJECT described herein.
E. Engineer's Personnel at Construction Site
(1) The presence or duties of the ENGINEER's personnel at a construction site,
whether as on -site representatives or otherwise, do not make the ENGINEER
or its personnel in any way responsible for those duties that belong to the CITY
and/or the CITY's construction contractors or other entities, and do not relieve
the construction contractors or any other entity of their obligations, duties, and
responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all construction methods, means,
techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating and
completing all portions of the construction work in accordance with the Contract
Documents and any health or safety precautions required by such construction
work. The ENGINEER and its personnel have no authority to exercise any
control over any construction contractor or other entity or their employees in
connection with their work or any health or safety precautions.
(2) Except to the extent of specific site visits expressly detailed and set forth in
Attachment A, the ENGINEER or its personnel shall have no obligation or
responsibility to visit the construction site to become familiar with the progress
or quality of the completed work on the PROJECT or to determine, in general, if
the work on the PROJECT is being performed in a manner indicating that the
PROJECT, when completed, will be in accordance with the Contract
Documents, nor shall anything in the Contract Documents or the agreement
between CITY and ENGINEER be construed as requiring ENGINEER to make
exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to discover latent defects in the
work or otherwise check the quality or quantity of the work on the PROJECT. If
the ENGINEER makes on -site observation(s) of a deviation from the Contract
Documents, the ENGINEER shall inform the CITY.
(3)
When professional certification of performance or characteristics of materials,
systems or equipment is reasonably required to perform the services set forth
in the Scope of Services, the ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely upon such
certification to establish materials, systems or equipment and performance
criteria to be required in the Contract Documents.
F. Opinions of Probable Cost, Financial Considerations, and Schedules
(1) The ENGINEER shall provide opinions of probable costs based on the
current available information at the time of preparation, in accordance with
Attachment A.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 3 of 14
(2) In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility
projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, the ENGINEER has no
control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent
conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or
maintenance costs* competitive bidding procedures and market
conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type,
management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic
and operational factors that may matenally affect the ultimate PROJECT
cost or schedule. Therefore, the ENGINEER makes no warranty that the
CITY's actual PROJECT costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or
schedules will not vary from the ENGINEER's opinions, analyses,
projections, or estimates.
G Construction Progress Payments
Recommendations by the ENGINEER to the CITY for periodic construction
progress payments to the construction contractor will be based on the
ENGINEER's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling and
observation that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such
recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations
have been made by the ENGINEER to ascertain that the construction
contractor has completed the work in exact accordance with the Contract
Documents; that the final work will be acceptable in all respects that the
ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purpose the
construction contractor has used the moneys paid; that title to any of the work,
materials, or equipment has passed to the CITY free and clear of liens, claims,
security interests, or encumbrances; or that there are not other matters at issue
between the CITY and the construction contractor that affect the amount that
should be paid.
H. Record Drawings
Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of
information compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent
the exact location, type of vanous components, or exact manner in which the
PROJECT was finally constructed The ENGINEER is not responsible for any
errors or omissions in the information from others that is incorporated into the
record drawings.
I. Minority and Woman Business Enterprise (M/WBE) Participation
In accord with City of Fort Worth Ordinance No. 15530, as amended, the City
has goals for the participation of minority business enterprises and woman
business enterprises in City contracts. Engineer acknowledges the M/WBE
goal established for this contract and its accepted written commitment to
M/WBE participation. Any misrepresentation of facts (other than a negligent
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineer ng Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 4 of 14
misrepresentation) and/or the commission of fraud by the Engineer may result
in the termination of this Agreement and debarment from participating in City
contracts for a period of time of not less than three (3) years.
J. Right to Audit
(1) ENGINEER agrees that the CITY shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after
final payment under this contract, have access to and the right to examine and
photocopy any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of the
ENGINEER involving transactions relating to this contract ENGINEER agrees
that the CITY shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary
ENGINEER facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work
space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this
section. The CITY shall give ENGINEER reasonable advance notice of
intended audits.
(2) ENGINEER further agrees to include in all its subconsultant agreements
hereunder a provision to the effect that the subconsultant agrees that the CITY
shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after final payment under the
subcontract, have access to and the right to examine and photocopy any
directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such subconsultant,
involving transactions to the subcontract, and further that the CITY shall have
access during normal working hours to all subconsultant facilities, and shall be
provided adequate and appropriate work space, in order to conduct audits in
compliance with the provisions of this article together with subsection (3)
hereof CITY shall give subconsultant reasonable advance notice of intended
audits.
(3)
ENGINEER and subconsultant agree to photocopy such documents as may be
requested by the CITY. The CITY agrees to reimburse ENGINEER for the cost
of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of
the time copying is performed.
K. INSURANCE
(1) ENGINEER'S INSURANCE
a. Commercial General Liability — the ENGINEER shall maintain commercial
general liability (CGL) and, if necessary, commercial umbrella insurance
with a limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 per each occurrence with a
$2,000,000.00 aggregate. If such Commercial General Liability insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this
PROJECT or location.
i. The CITY shall be included as an insured under the CGL, using ISO
additional insured endorsement or a substitute providing equivalent
coverage, and under the commercial umbrella if any. This
insurance shall apply as primary insurance with respect to any other
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 5 of 14
insurance or self-insurance programs afforded to the CITY. The
Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall have no
exclusions by endorsements that would alter or nullify:
premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual,
personal injury, or advertizing injury, which are normally contained
within the policy, unless the CITY approves such exclusions in
writing.
ii ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the commercial general
liability or commercial umbrella liability insurance maintained in
accordance with this agreement.
b Business Auto — the ENGINEER shall maintain business auto liability and, if
necessary commercial umbrella liability insurance with a limit of not less
than $1,000,000 each accident Such insurance shall cover liability arising
out of "any auto', including owned, hired, and non -owned autos, when said
vehicle is used in the course of the PROJECT. If the engineer owns no
vehicles, coverage for hired or non -owned is acceptable.
ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by the business auto liability or
commercial umbrella liability insurance obtained by ENGINEER
pursuant to this agreement or under any applicable auto physical
damage coverage.
c. Workers' Compensation —ENGINEER shall maintain workers compensation
and employers liability insurance and, if necessary commercial umbrella
liability insurance with a limit of not less than $100,000.00 each accident for
bodily injury by accident or $100,000.00 each employee for bodily injury by
disease, with $500,000.00 policy limit.
i. ENGINEER waives all rights against the CITY and its agents,
officers, directors and employees for recovery of damages to the
extent these damages are covered by workers compensation and
employer's liability or commercial umbrella insurance obtained by
ENGINEER pursuant to this agreement.
d. Professional Liability — the ENGINEER shall maintain professional liability a
claims -made policy, with a minimum of $1,000,000.00 per claim and
aggregate The policy shall contain a retroactive date prior to the date of the
contract or the first date of services to be performed, whichever is earlier.
Coverage shall be maintained for a period of 5 years following the
completion of the contract. An annual certificate of insurance specifically
referencing this project shall be submitted to the CITY for each year
following completion of the contract.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 6 of 14
(2) GENERAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
a. Certificates of insurance evidencing that the ENGINEER has obtained all
required insurance shall be delivered to the CITY prior to ENGINEER
proceeding with the PROJECT.
b. Applicable policies shall be endorsed to name the CITY an Additional
Insured thereon, as its interests may appear. The term CITY shall include
its employees, officers, officials, agents, and volunteers as respects the
contracted services.
c. Certificate(s) of insurance shall document that insurance coverage specified
in this agreement are provided under applicable policies documented
thereon.
d. Any failure on part of the CITY to request required insurance documentation
shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements.
e. A minimum of thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material change in
coverage shall be provided to the CITY. A ten (10) days notice shall be
acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium Notice shall be sent to
the respective Department Director (by name), City of Fort Worth, 1000
Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
f. Insurers for all policies must be authorized to do business in the State of
Texas and have a minimum rating of A:V or greater, in the current A M.
Best Key Rating Guide or have reasonably equivalent financial strength and
solvency to the satisfaction of Risk Management.
g.
Any deductible or self insured retention in excess of $25,000.00 that would
change or alter the requirements herein is subject to approval by the CITY
in writing if coverage is not provided on a first -dollar basis. The CITY, at it
sole discretion, may consent to alternative coverage maintained through
insurance pools or risk retention groups. Dedicated financial resources or
letters of credit may also be acceptable to the CITY.
h. Applicable policies shall each be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in
favor of the CITY as respects the PROJECT.
i. The CITY shall be entitled, upon its request and without incurring expense,
to review the ENGINEER's insurance policies including endorsements
thereto and, at the CITY's discretion; the ENGINEER may be required to
provide proof of insurance premium payments.
Lines of coverage, other than Professional Liability underwritten on a
claims -made basis, shall contain a retroactive date coincident with or prior
to the date of the contractual agreement. The certificate of insurance shall
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7,22,2011
Page 7 of 14
state both the retroactive date and that the coverage is claims -made.
k. Coverages, whether written on an occurrence or claims -made basis, shall
be maintained without interruption nor restrictive modification or changes
from date of commencement of the PROJECT until final payment and
termination of any coverage required to be maintained after final payments.
I. The CITY shall not be responsible for the direct payment of any insurance
premiums required by this agreement.
m. Sub consultants and subcontractors to/of the ENGINEER shall be required
by the ENGINEER to maintain the same or reasonably equivalent insurance
coverage as required for the ENGINEER When sub
consultants/subcontractors maintain insurance coverage, ENGINEER shall
provide CITY with documentation thereof on a certificate of insurance.
L. Independent Consultant
The ENGINEER agrees to perform all services as an independent consultant
and not as a subcontractor, agent, or employee of the CITY.
Disclosure
The ENGINEER acknowledges to the CITY that it has made full disclosure in
writing of any existing conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest,
including personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in property abutting the
proposed PROJECT and business relationships with abutting property cities.
The ENGINEER further acknowledges that it will make disclosure in writing of
any conflicts of interest that develop subsequent to the signing of this contract
and prior to final payment under the contract
N. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances
(1) If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or
suspected, the ENGINEER will stop its own work in the affected portions of
the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation.
(2) If asbestos or other hazardous substances are suspected, the CITY may
request the ENGINEER to assist in obtaining the services of a qualified
subcontractor to manage the remediation activities of the PROJECT.
O. Permitting Authorities - Design Changes
If permitting authorities require design changes so as to comply with published
design criteria and/or current engineering practice standards which the
ENGINEER should have been aware of at the time this Agreement was
executed, the ENGINEER shall revise plans and specifications, as required, at
its own cost and expense. However, if design changes are required due to the
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 8 of 14
changes in the permitting authorities' published design criteria and/or practice
standards criteria which are published after the date of this Agreement which
the ENGINEER could not have been reasonably aware of, the ENGINEER
shall notify the CITY of such changes and an adjustment in compensation will
be made through an amendment to this AGREEMENT.
P. Schedule
ENGINEER shall manage the PROJECT in accordance with the schedule
developed per Attachment D to this AGREEMENT.
Article V
Obligations of the City
Amendments to Article V, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. City -Furnished Data
ENGINEER may rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the
information provided by the CITY.
B Access to Facilities and Property
The CITY will make its facilities accessible to the ENGINEER as required for
the ENGINEER's performance of its services The CITY will perform, at no
cost to the ENGINEER, such tests of equipment, machinery, pipelines, and
other components of the CITY s facilities as may be required in connection with
the ENGINEER's services. The CITY will be responsible for all acts of the
CITY's personnel.
C. Advertisements, Permits, and Access
Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, the CITY will obtain,
arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses required
by local, state, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights -of -way, and
access necessary for the ENGINEER's services or PROJECT construction.
D Timely Review
The CITY will examine the ENGINEER's studies, reports, sketches drawings
specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of an attorney,
insurance counselor, accountant, auditor, bond and financial advisors, and
other consultants as the CITY deems appropriate; and render in writing
decisions required by the CITY in a timely manner in accordance with the
project schedule prepared in accordance with Attachment D.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 9 of 14
Prompt Notice
The CITY will give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever CITY
observes or becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or
timing of the ENGINEER's services or of any defect in the work of the
ENGINEER or construction contractors.
F. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances Release.
(1) CITY acknowledges ENGINEER will perform part of the work at CITY's
facilities that may contain hazardous materials, including asbestos
containing materials, or conditions, and that ENGINEER had no prior role
in the generation, treatment, storage, or disposition of such materials. In
consideration of the associated risks that may give rise to claims by third
parties or employees of City, City hereby releases ENGINEER from any
damage or liability related to the presence of such materials.
(2) The release required above shall not apply in the event the discharge,
release or escape of hazardous substances, contaminants, or asbestos is a
result of ENGINEER's negligence or if ENGINEER brings such hazardous
substance, contaminant or asbestos onto the project.
G. Contractor Indemnification and Claims
The CITY agrees to include in all construction contracts the provisions of Article
IV E regarding the ENGINEER's Personnel at Construction Site and
provisions providing contractor indemnification of the CITY and the ENGINEER
for contractor's negligence.
H. Contractor Claims and Third -Party Beneficiaries
(1) The CITY agrees to include the following clause in all contracts with
construction contractors and equipment or materials suppliers:
"Contractors, subcontractors and equipment and materials
suppliers on the PROJECT, or their sureties, shall maintain no
direct action against the ENGINEER, its officers, employees,
and subcontractors, for any claim arising out of, in connection
with, or resulting from the engineering services performed.
Only the CITY will be the beneficiary of any undertaking by the
ENGINEER "
(2) This AGREEMENT gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than the CITY
and the ENGINEER and there are no third -party beneficiaries.
(3)
The CITY will include in each agreement it enters into with any other entity or
person regarding the PROJECT a provision that such entity or person shall
have no third -party beneficiary rights under this Agreement.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 10 of 14
(4) Nothing contained in this section V.H. shall be construed as a waiver of any
right the CITY has to bring a claim against ENGINEER
I. CITY's Insurance
(1) The CITY may maintain property insurance on certain pre-existing structures
associated with the PROJECT.
(2) The CITY will ensure that Builders Risk/Installation insurance is maintained at
the replacement cost value of the PROJECT. The CITY may provide
ENGINEER a copy of the policy or documentation of such on a certificate of
insurance.
(3)
The CITY will specify that the Builders Risk/Installation insurance shall be
comprehensive in coverage appropriate to the PROJECT risks.
J. Litigation Assistance
The Scope of Services does not include costs of the ENGINEER for required or
requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in
litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. In the event CITY requests such
services of the ENGINEER, this AGREEMENT shall be amended or a separate
agreement will be negotiated between the parties.
K. Changes
The CITY may make or approve changes within the general Scope of Services
in this AGREEMENT. If such changes affect the ENGINEER's cost of or time
required for performance of the services, an equitable adjustment will be made
through an amendment to this AGREEMENT with appropriate CITY approval.
Article VI
General Legal Provisions
Amendments to Article VI, if any, are included in Attachment C.
A. Authorization to Proceed
ENGINEER shall be authorized to proceed with this AGREEMENT upon
receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the CITY.
B. Reuse of Project Documents
All designs, drawings specifications, documents, and other work products of
the ENGINEER, whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments of
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 11 of 14
service for this PROJECT, whether the PROJECT is completed or not. Reuse,
change, or alteration by the CITY or by others acting through or on behalf of the
CITY of any such instruments of service without the written permission of the
ENGINEER will be at the CITY's sole risk. The CITY shall own the final
designs, drawings, specifications and documents.
Force Majeure
The ENGINEER is not responsible for damages or delay in performance
caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the
control of the ENGINEER that prevent ENGINEER s performance of its
obligations hereunder.
D Termination
(1)
This AGREEMENT may be terminated only by the City for convenience on
30 days' written notice. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either the
CITY or the ENGINEER for cause if either party fails substantially to perform
through no fault of the other and does not commence correction of such
nonperformance with in 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the
correction thereafter.
(2) If this AGREEMENT is terminated for the convenience of the City, the
ENGINEER will be paid for termination expenses as follows:
a.) Cost of reproduction of partial or complete studies, plans, specifications
or other forms of ENGINEER'S work product,
b.) Out-of-pocket expenses for purchasing electronic data files and other
data storage supplies or services;
The time requirements for the ENGINEER'S personnel to document the
work underway at the time of the CITY'S termination for convenience so
that the work effort is suitable for long time storage.
(3) Prior to proceeding with termination services, the ENGINEER will submit
to the CITY an itemized statement of all termination expenses The CITY'S
approval will be obtained in writing prior to proceeding with termination
services.
E. Suspension, Delay, or Interruption to Work
The CITY may suspend, delay, or interrupt the services of the ENGINEER for
the convenience of the CITY. In the event of such suspension, delay, or
interruption, an equitable adjustment in the PROJECT s schedule, commitment
and cost of the ENGINEERs personnel and subcontractors, and ENGINEER's
compensation will be made.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 12 of 14
F. Indemnification
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the
ENGINEER shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the CITY against
liability for any damage caused by or resulting from an act of negligence,
intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure to pay a
subcontractor or supplier committed by the ENGINEER or ENGINEER s agent,
consultant under contract, or another entity over which the ENGINEER
exercises control.
G Assignment
Neither party shall assign all or any part of this AGREEMENT without the prior
written consent of the other party.
H. Interpretation
Limitations on liability and indemnities in this AGREEMENT are business
understandings between the parties and shall apply to all the different theories
of recovery, including breach of contract or warranty, tort including negligence,
strict or statutory liability, or any other cause of action, except for willful
misconduct or gross negligence for limitations of liability and sole negligence
for indemnification. Parties mean the CITY and the ENGINEER, and their
officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors.
I. Jurisdiction
The law of the State of Texas shall govern the validity of this AGREEMENT, its
interpretation and performance, and any other claims related to it. The venue
for any litigation related to this AGREEMENT shall be Tarrant County, Texas.
J. Severability and Survival
If any of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT are held for any reason
to be invalid illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality,
or unenforceability will not affect any other provision, and this AGREEMENT
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had
never been contained herein. Articles V F. VI.B., VI D , VLF., VLH., and VI.I.
shall survive termination of this AGREEMENT for any cause.
K. Observe and Comply
ENGINEER shall at all times observe and comply with all federal and State
laws and regulations and with all City ordinances and regulations which in any
way affect this AGREEMENT and the work hereunder, and shall observe and
comply with all orders, laws ordinances and regulations which may exist or may
be enacted later by governing bodies having jurisdiction or authority for such
enactment. No plea of misunderstanding or ignorance thereof shall be
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 13 of 14
considered. ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY
and all of its officers, agents and employees from and against all claims or
liability arising out of the violation of any such order, law, ordinance, or
regulation, whether it be by itself or its employees.
Article VII
Attachments, Schedules, and Signatures
This AGREEMENT, including its attachments and schedules, constitutes the entire
AGREEMENT, supersedes all prior written or oral understandings, and may only be changed
by a written amendment executed by both parties. The following attachments and schedules
are hereby made a part of this AGREEMENT:
Attachment A - Scope of Services
Attachment B m Compensation
Attachment C - Amendments to Standard Agreement for Engineering Services
Attachment D - Project Schedule
Attachment E - Location Map
Executed and effective this the day of tkI , 2011.
ATTEST:
Marty Hendri
City Secretary
APPROVED AS
K • •4i
• A nCaato0
d
CITY OF FORT WORTH
~` `}- ernando Costa
��: Assistant City Manager
00 PA'
'4� c"
0 FORM AND LEPA •
<<1T'_. ") U° A1R
By: -
Douglas W. Black
Assistant City Attorney
M&C No.: Z 5 Z SH
M&C Date: q , 1- 1
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Standard Agreement for Engineering Related Design Services
PMO Official Release Date: 7.22.2011
Page 14 of 14
AL RECO!MENDED
0
andleHa
f
Director, anning and Development
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Glenn Gary, P.E.
Senior Vice President
OFFMML
isECORD
CITY 54�. E
W:Ssiii45
ATTACHMENT "A"
Scope for Enaineerina Design Related Services for Street Improvements
The scope set forth herein defines the work to be performed by the ENGINEER in
completing the project. Both the CITY and ENGINEER have attempted to clearly define the
work to be performed and address the needs of the Project.
OBJECTIVE
The ENGINEER will render engineering design services in conjunction with the Ridglea
U rban Village Streetscape Improvements project for the City of Fort Worth. The project
includes pedestrian crosswalk improvements at the intersection of Camp Bowie Blvd. and
Westridge Ave.; pedestrian crosswalk improvements and sidewalk construction at Camp
Bowie Blvd. and Winthrop Ave.; and sidewalk construction extending from Sunset Dr. to
Camp Bowie Blvd. along the west side of Bryant Irvin Rd. Additionally, the ENGINEER will
complete a pedestrian crossing feasibility study at the intersection of Bryant Irvin Rd and
S unset Dr. Upon completion of the pedestrian crossing feasibility study the ENGINEER will
render engineering design service for pedestrian crosswalk improvements and sidewalk
construction at the intersection of Bryant Irvin Rd. and Sunset Dr. or pedestrian crosswalk
improvements at Bryant Irvin Rd and Milburn St including a pedestrian crosswalk crossing
S unset Dr. on the west side of Bryant Irvin Rd.
Task 1.
Task 2.
Task 3.
Task 4.
Task 5.
Task 6.
Task 7.
Task 8.
Task 9.
Task 10.
Task 11.
WORK TO BE PERFORMED
Design Management
Camp Bowie Blvd. at Westridge Ave. Design
Camp Bowie Blvd. at Winthrop Ave. Design
Bryant Irvin Sidewalk Design
Pedestrian Crossing Feasibility Study
Bryant Irvin Rd. at Sunset Dr. / Millburn St.
Environmental Document Coordination
Bid Phase Services
Construction Phase Services
Survey Services
Permitting
TASK 1. DESIGN MANAGEMENT.
The ENGINEER will manage the work outlined in this scope to ensure efficient and effective
use of the ENGINEER's and the CITY's time and resources. The ENGINEER will manage
change communicate effectively, coordinate internally and externally as needed, and
proactively address issues with the CITY's Project Manager and others as necessary to
make progress on the work.
•
•
Managing the Team
Lead, manage and direct design team activities
Ensure quality control is practiced in performance of the work
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 06.19.2010
Page 1 of 12
• Communicate internally and externally among team members
•
Task and allocate team resources
1.2. Communications and Reporting
• Attend a pre -design project kickoff/chartering meetings with CITY staff to confirm and
clarify scope, understand CITY objectives, and ensure economical and functional
designs that meet CITY requirements
• Prepare for and attend a Public Meeting.
• Conduct and document monthly project update meetings with CITY Project Manager.
• Conduct review meetings with the CITY at the end of each design phase.
• Conduct and document biweekly design team meetings.
•
•
Prepare and submit monthly invoices in accordance with Attachment B to this
Standard Agreement in the format requested by the CITY.
• Prepare and submit monthly progress reports in the format provided by the respective
CITY Department.
Prepare and submit baseline Project Schedule initially, and Project Schedule updates
with a schedule narrative monthly, as required in Attachment D to this Standard
Agreement and according to the City of Fort Worth's Schedule Guidance Document.
• Complete Monthly DBE Report Form and Final Summary Payment Report Form at
the end of the project.
• Coordinate with other agencies and entities as necessary for the design of the
proposed infrastructure, and provide and obtain information needed to prepare the
design.
With respect to coordination with permitting authorities, the ENGINEER shall
communicate with permitting authorities such that their regulatory requirements are
appropriately reflected in the designs. The ENGINEER shall work with regulatory
authorities to obtain approval of the designs, and make changes necessary to meet
their requirements, as part of the design scope.
• Personnel and Vehicle Identification: When conducting site visits to the project
location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall carry readily visible
information identifying the name of the company and the company representative.
•
DELIVERABLES
A. Meeting summaries with action items
B. Monthly invoices
C. Monthly progress reports
D. Baseline design schedule
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 2 of 12
E Monthly schedule updates with schedule narrative describing any current or
anticipated schedule changes
F. Monthly DBE Report Form and Final Summary Payment Report Form
TASK 2. CAMP BOWIE BLVD. AT WESTRIDGE AVE. DESIGN
The ENGINEER will design the following improvements at the intersection of Camp Bowie
Blvd and Westridge Ave.:
• Enhanced crosswalks crossing all four (4) sides of the intersection.
•
•
•
•
ADA compliant curb ramps on each corner. The ENGINEER will coordinate with the
Traffic Services Department on the placement of the curb ramps to allow for
accessibility to the proposed traffic signal equipment.
Improved valley gutter design to meet ADA requirements.
Landscaping and irrigation design on the northeast corner of the intersection.
Traffic control plans to support the construction of the proposed improvements.
The ENGINEER will develop 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design plans for this intersection.
The design packages will include design plan sheets, specifications, standards, and opinion
of probable construction costs
ASSUMPTIONS
• Three (3) sets of 11" x 17" size paper plans and a PDF file will be delivered for
each submittal.
• Two (2) supplemental Traffic Control drawings will be needed.
•
DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated
project folder in Buzzsaw.
• The ENGINEER shall not proceed with design activities for the next submittal
without written approval by the CITY of the submittal under review at that time.
DELIVERABLES
A. 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design packages.
TASK 3. CAMP BOWIE BLVD. AT WINTHROP AVE. DESIGN
The ENGINEER will design the following improvements at the intersection of Camp Bowie
Blvd and Winthrop Ave.:
• Enhanced crosswalk crossing the southern side of the intersection.
• ADA compliant curb ramps on the southwest and southeast corners of the
intersection.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 3 of 12
•
• Improved valley gutter design on the northbound approach of the intersection to
meet ADA requirements.
• Sidewalk from the southeast corner of the intersection to the east to tie into the
existing sidewalk just east of the Ridglea Theater.
Replace the existing Ridglea Theater driveway approach with an ADA compliant
driveway approach.
• Traffic control plan to support the construction of the proposed improvements.
The ENGINEER will develop 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design plans for this intersection.
The design packages will include design plan sheets, specifications, standards, and opinion
of probable construction costs
ASSUMPTIONS
• Three (3) sets of 11" x 17" size paper plans and a PDF file will be delivered for
each submittal.
• Two (2) supplemental Traffic Control drawings will be needed.
• DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated
project folder in Buzzsaw.
• The ENGINEER shall not proceed with design activities for the next submittal
without written approval by the CITY of the submittal under review at that time.
DELIVERABLES
A. 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design packages.
TASK 4 BRYANT IRVIN SIDEWALK DESIGN
The ENGINEER will design the following improvements at the intersection of Camp Bowie
Blvd and Winthrop Ave.:
•
•
•
Sidewalk along the west side of Bryan Irvin Rd. from Geddes Ave. to Sunset Dr.
Replace any non -compliant driveway approaches within the sidewalk limits.
Traffic control plan to support the construction of the proposed improvements.
The ENGINEER will develop 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design plans for this intersection.
The design packages will include design plan sheets, specifications, standards, and opinion
of probable construction costs
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 4 of 12
ASSUMPTIONS
• Three (3) sets of 11" x 17" size paper plans and a PDF file will be delivered for
each submittal.
• Two (2) supplemental Traffic Control drawings will be needed.
• DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated
project folder in Buzzsaw.
• The ENGINEER shall not proceed with design activities for the next submittal
without written approval by the CITY of the submittal under review at that time.
DELIVERABLES
A. 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design packages.
TASK 5. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY
The ENGINEER will conduct field observations and collect existing pedestrian count data at
the intersection of Bryant Irvin Rd. and Sunset Dr. The ENGINEER will utilize recent
research data conducted by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) to aid in the analysis of
the feasibility of a mid -block crossing at Sunset Dr
The ENGINEER will prepare a technical memorandum detailing the data collected, analysis,
and recommendation for the feasibility of a mid -block crossing. If a mid -block crossing is
determined to be feasible, any active warning devices that would be required will be
recommended in the memo.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Three (3) copies and a PDF of the draft technical memorandum will be submitted
to the CITY for review.
• Three (3) copies and a PDF of the final, signed and sealed technical
memorandum will be submitted to the CITY after CITY comments have been
addressed.
DELIVERABLES
A. Draft and Final Technical Memorandum.
TASK 6. BRYAN IRVIN RD. AT SUNSET DR. / MILBURN RD. DESIGN
Based on the results of the technical memorandum developed during Task 5, the
ENGINEER will design at either the intersection of Bryant Irvin Rd. and Sunset Dr. or at
Bryant Irvin Rd and Milburn Rd.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 5 of 12
If the intersection of Bryant Irvin Rd. and Sunset Dr. is selected, the following improvements
will be designed:
• Enhanced crosswalk crossing the western and southern sides of the intersection.
• ADA compliant curb ramps on the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners of
the intersection.
• Active warning devices for the crossing of Bryant Irvin Rd.
If the intersection of Bryant Irvin Rd. and Milburn Rd. is selected, the following improvements
will be designed:
• Enhanced crosswalk crossing the western and southern sides of the intersection.
• Enhanced crosswalk crossing Sunset Dr. on the western side of Bryant Irvin Rd.
• ADA compliant curb ramps on the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners of
the intersection.
The ENGINEER will develop 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design plans for the selected
intersection The design packages will include design plan sheets specifications,
standards, and opinion of probable construction costs.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Three (3) sets of 11" x 17" size paper plans and a PDF file will be delivered for
each submittal.
• Two (2) supplemental Traffic Control drawings will be needed.
• DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated
project folder in Buzzsaw.
• ENGINEER shall not proceed with design activities for the next submittal without
written approval by the CITY of the submittal under review at that time.
DELIVERABLES
A. 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design packages.
TASK 7. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT COORDINATION.
The ENGINEER will coordinate with the CITY's environmental consultant in the preparation
of the environmental document for the project.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Five (5) hours of effort are included in this task. Additional effort beyond the 5
hours will be considered additional services.
DELIVERABLES
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 6 of 12
A. There are no deliverables anticipated for this task.
TASK 8. BID PHASE SERVICES
The ENGINEER will support the bid phase of the project as follows.
8.1. Bid Support
• The ENGINEER shall upload all plans and contract documents onto Buzzsaw for
access to potential bidders.
• Contract documents shall be uploaded in a .xls file.
• Unit Price Proposal documents are to be created utilizing CFW Bidtools only
and combined in a specified spreadsheet workbook, Bid Proposal Worksheet
Template, and will be populated and configured so that all pages are
complete and the Summary Worksheet(s) in the workbook detail and
automatically summarize the totals from the inserted Unit Price Proposal
document worksheets.
• Plan Sets are to be uploaded to Buzzsaw in two formats, .pdf and .dwf files.
The .pdf will consist of one file of the entire plan set. The .dwf will consist of
individual files one for each plan sheet, and will be numbered and named in
a manner similar to that of the plan set index.
• The ENGINEER shall sell contract documents and maintain a plan holders list on
Buzzsaw from documents sold and from Contractor's uploaded Plan Holder
Registrations in Buzzsaw.
• The ENGINEER will develop and implement procedures for receiving and
answering bidders' questions and requests for additional information The
procedures shall include a log of all significant bidders questions and requests
and the response thereto. The log shall be housed and maintained in the
project's Buzzsaw folder titled Request for Information. The ENGINEER will
provide technical interpretation of the contract bid documents and will prepare
proposed responses to all bidders questions and requests, in the form of
addenda The ENGINEER shall upload all approved addenda onto Buzzsaw and
mail addenda to all plan holders
• Attend the prebid conference in support of the CITY.
• Assist the CITY in determining the qualifications and acceptability of prospective
contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers.
• When substitution prior to award of contracts is allowed in the contract
documents, the ENGINEER will advise the CITY as to the acceptability of
alternate materials and equipment proposed by bidders.
• Attend the bid opening in support of the CITY.
• Tabulate and review all bids received for the construction project, assist the CITY
in evaluating bids, and recommend award of the contract. A copy of the Bid
Tabulation is to be uploaded into the project's Bid Responses folder on Buzzsaw.
• Incorporate all addenda into the contract documents and issue conformed sets.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 7 of 12
• The project will be bid only once and awarded to one contractor.
• Fifteen (15) sets of construction documents will be sold to and made available on
Buzzsaw for plan holders and/or given to plan viewing rooms.
Fifteen (15) sets of construction documents will be printed and made available for
purchase by planholders and/or given to plan viewing rooms.
• Five (5) sets of 11" x 17" size plans and specifications (conformed, if applicable)
will be delivered to the CITY.
• PDF and DWF files will be uploaded to Buzzsaw.
DELIVERABLES
A. Addenda
B. Bid tabulations
C. Recommendation of award
D. Construction documents (conformed, if applicable)
TASK 9. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
The ENGINEER will support the construction phase of the project as follows.
9.1 Construction Support
• The ENGINEER shall attend the preconstruction conference.
•
After the pre -construction conference the ENGINEER shall provide project
exhibits and attend public meeting to help explain the proposed project to
residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location and mail the invitation letters
to the affected customers.
• The ENGINEER shall visit the project site at requested intervals as construction
proceeds to observe and report on progress.
• As requested by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall provide necessary interpretations
and clarifications of contract documents review change orders, and make
recommendations as to the acceptability of the work.
The ENGINEER shall attend the ' Final" project walk through and assist with
preparation of final punch list.
9.2 Record Drawings
• The ENGINEER shall prepare record drawings from information submitted by the
inspector and/or Contractor. The drawings shall be submitted as half size (11' x
17') Mylar drawings.
•
ASSUMPTIONS
•
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 8 of 12
• The ENGINEER shall submit a set of sealed conformed Mylar drawings for record
storage.
• Record Drawings shall also be submitted as an Adobe Acrobat PDF format
(version 6.0 or higher) file and DWF format. There shall be one (1) PDF file and
one (1) DWF file for the TPW plan set and a separate PDF and DWF file for the
Water plan set Each PDF and DWF file shall contain all associated sheets of the
particular plan set. Singular PDF and DWF files for each sheet of a plan set
will not be accepted. PDF and DWF files shall conform to naming conventions
as follows:
1. TPW file name example — "W-1956_org47.pdf" where "W-1956" is the
assigned file number obtained from the CITY, "_org' designating the file is
of an original plan set, ' 47" shall be the total number of sheets in this file.
Example: W 0053_org3.pdf and K-0320_org5.pdf
II. Water and Sewer file name example — "X-35667_org36.pdf" where "X-
35667" is the assigned file number obtained from the CITY, "_org"
designating the file is of an original plan set, "36' shall be the total number
of sheets in this file.
Example: X-12755_orgl8.pdf
Both PDF and DWF files shall be uploaded to the project's Record Drawing folder
in Buzzsaw.
For information on the proper manner to submit files and to obtain a file number for
the project, contact the Department of Transportation and Public Works Vault at
telephone number (817) 392-8426. File numbers will not be issued to a project
unless the appropriate project numbers and fund codes have been assigned and
are in the Department of Transportation and Public Works database.
ASSUMPTIONS
•
•
•
•
Two (2) site visits are assumed.
Two (2) RFI's are assumed.
One (1) Change Orders are assumed.
Researching property owner information, creating invitations, and mailing
invitations to the Public Meeting is not included in this scope of services.
DELIVERABLES
A. Public meeting exhibits
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08,27,2010
Page 9 of 12
B. Response to Contractor's Request for Information
C. Review of Change Orders
D. Final Punch List items
E Record Drawings
TASK 10. SURVEY SERVICES
The ENGINEER will provide survey support as follows.
10.1. Design Survey
•
•
The ENGINEER will perform field surveys to collect horizontal and vertical
elevations and other information needed by the ENGINEER in design and
preparation of plans for the project. Information gathered during the survey shall
include topographic data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers,
rim/invert elevations, location of buried utilities structures, trees (measure
caliper, identify overall canopy, and have qualified arborist identify species of
trees), and other features relevant to the final plan sheets Existing drainage at
intersections will be verified by field surveys. Spot elevations will be shown on
intersection layouts with cross slope to fit intersecting grade lines
The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include the
following:
A Project Control Sheet showing ALL Control Points, used or set while
gathering data Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400
The following information about each Control Point,
a. Identified (Existing. CITY Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8" Iron Rod)
b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system, and a
referred bearing base. Z coordinate on CITY Datum only.
c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in the South
curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of radius at the Southeast
corner of North Side Drive and North Main Street).
Coordinates on all P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, Manholes, Valves, etc., in the
same coordinate system, as the Control.
No Tess than two horizontal bench marks, per line or location.
Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines.
Station equations relating utilities to paving, when appropriate.
ASSUMPTIONS
• No right of entry documents will be required.
DELIVERABLES
A. Copies of field survey data and notes signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 10 of 12
B. Drawing of the project layout with dimensions and coordinate list.
TASK 11. PERMITTING.
The ENGINEER will provide permitting support for the CITY to obtain any and all
agreements and/or permits normally required for a project of this size and type, as follows.
11.1. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
• For projects that disturb an area greater than one (1) acre, the ENGINEER will
prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) required for the
Project for use by the Contractor during construction. The ENGINEER will
prepare drawings and details for proposed SWPPP improvement that the
Contractor must use during construction. Contractor will be responsible for filing
the SWPPP with appropriate regulatory agencies.
11.2. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Driveway Permit
• Meet, negotiate and coordinate to obtain approval of the agency issuing the
agreement and/or permits.
• Completing all forms/applications necessary.
• Submitting forms/applications for CITY and TxDOT review
• Submitting revised forms for agency review
• Responding to agency comments and requests
11.3. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR)
• Identify and analyze the requirements of the Texas Architectural Barriers Act,
Chapter 68 Texas Administrative Code, and become familiar with the
governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project.
• Submit construction documents to the TDLR
• Completing all TDLR forms/applications necessary
• Obtain the Notice of Substantial Compliance from the TDLR
• Request an inspection from TDLR or a TDLR locally approved Registered
Accessibility Specialist no later than 30 calendar days after construction
substantial completion. Advise the CITY in writing of the results of the inspection.
• Responding to agency comments and requests
ASSUMPTIONS
• Permit preparation will begin after approval of the 90% design plans.
• One (1) meeting is assumed with TxDOT for the driveway permit.
DELIVERABLES
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 11 of 12
A. TxDOT Driveway Permit and Plan Set.
B. TDLR review plan set.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THE EXISTING SCOPE OF SERVICES
Additional Services not included in the existina Scope of Services — CITY and
ENGINEER agree that the following services are beyond the Scope of Services
described in the tasks above. However, the ENGINEER can provide these services,
if needed, upon the CITY's written request. Any additional amounts paid to the
ENGINEER as a result of any material change to the Scope of the Project shall be
agreed upon in writing by both parties before the services are performed. These
additional services include the following:
• Negotiation of easements or property acquisition.
• Services related to development of the CITY's project financing and/or budget.
• Services related to disputes over pre -qualification, bid protests bid rejection
and re -bidding of the contract for construction.
• Construction management and inspection services.
• Performance of materials testing or specialty testing services.
• Services necessary due to the default of the Contractor.
• Services related to damages caused by fire, flood, earthquake or other acts of
God.
• Services related to warranty claims, enforcement and inspection after final
completion.
• Services to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation
undertaken or defended by the CITY.
• Performance of miscellaneous and supplemental services related to the project
as requested by the CITY.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment A
PMO Release Date: 08.27.2010
Page 12 of 12
ATTACHMENT B
COMPENSATION
Design Services for
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements
City Project No. 01786
Lump Sum Project
I. Compensation
A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated a total lump sum fee of $61,138.00 as
summarized in Exhibit B-1 — Engineer Invoice and Section IV — Summary of Total
Project Fees. The total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for
the services described in Attachment A, including all labor materials, supplies,
and equipment necessary to deliver the services.
B. The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Section II -
Method of Payment.
II. Method of Payment
A. Partial payment shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon City's approval of
an invoice prepared and submitted by the ENGINEER in the format and including
content as presented in Exhibit B-1, Progress Reports as required in item III. of
this Attachment B, and Schedule as required in Attachment D to this Agreement.
The estimated current physical percent complete as required on the invoice shall
be calculated from the progress schedule as required in Attachment D to this
Standard Agreement and according to the current version of the City of Fort
Worth's Schedule Guidance Document.
C. The cumulative sum of such monthly partial fee payments shall not exceed the
total current project budget including all approved Amendments.
D. Each invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of
this Agreement by an officer of the ENGINEER
III. Progress Reports
A. The ENGINEER shall prepare and submit to the designated representative of the
Planning Department monthly progress reports and schedules in the format
required by the City.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment B
PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010
Page 1 of 5
B-1
ATTACHMENT B
COMPENSATION
IV. Summary of Total Project Fees
Firm
P rime Consultant
Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc.
P rimary Responsibility
P roject Management, Design,
Bidding Permitting
P roposed DBE Sub -Consultants
A.N.A. Consultants, Topographic Survey
L.L.C.
N on -DBE Consultants
HOK Landscape Architect
Project Number & Name
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape
Improvements
TOTAL
Total Fee
$61,138.00
Fee Amount
$50,263.00
82.2
$4,275.00 7.0
$6,600 10.8
$611138.00 100%
DBE Fee
$4,275.00
DBE%
7.0%
City DBE Goal = 5% Consultant Committed Goal = 5%
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment B
PMO Official Release Date: 5,19,2010
Page 2 of 5
B-2
EXHIBIT "B-1"
ENGINEER INVOICE
(Supplement to Attachment B)
Insert required invoice format following this page, including negotiated total budget and
allocations of budgets across work types and work phases.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment B
PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010
Page 3 of 5
Professional Services Payment Request Project Manager: (Noah Heath, AICP
Project:
City Project #:
City Sec Number:
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements
Eli 1
1
Company Name: IKimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
Consultant's PM:
Vendor Invoice #:
Payment Request #:
From Date:
To Date:
Invoice Date:
Sheet
Work Type 1
Work Type 2
Work Type 3
Work Type 4
Work Type 5
Work Type 6
Scott Amold
email:
Office Address
Telephone:
Consultant Instructions:
Summary
Fill in green cells including Invoice Number, From and To Dates and the included worksheets.
When your Invoice is complete, save and close, start Buzzsaw and Add your invoice to the
Consultant folder within Project's folder.
scoff. amolde kimlev-hom. com
801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 950, Fort Worth, TX 76102
817-335-6511
Fax: 817-335-5070
Remit Address'
FAC and Work Type Description
Totals This Payment Request
1
1
1
LOCK
UNLOCK
Agreement
Agreement Amendment Amount to Completed Percent ($) Invoiced Current Remaining
Amount Amount Date Amount Completed Previously Invoice Balance
Overall Percentage Complete:
EXHIBIT "B-2"
ENGINEER LEVEL OF EFFORT
(Supplement to Attachment B)
Insert level of effort following this page.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment B
PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010
Page 4 of 5
Task No.
Task Description
Rat
1.0 Project Manatgement
1.1 Managing the Team
1.1.1 Internal Team Meetings
1.1.2 QA/QC
1.2 9inrrwp[9ptins an) RepQlting
1.2.1 Preesjpp Coordinationivleeting
1.2.2 Public Meeting
1.2.3 Monthly Project Upte Meetin s
1.2.4 Design 'ubmittaf Keview Meetings
1.2.5 Prepare Baseline Schedule
Prepare Monthly Progress Reports with
1.2.6 Schedule
1.2.7 Preppie Monthly MWBE Reports
1.2.8 Invoicing
1.2.9 Subconsultant Meetings and Mgmt
2.0 Camp,Bowie at Westridge (Exhibit 2)
2.1 Data Collection / Base Mapping
2.2 Survey
2.3 Conceptual Design '30%)
2.4 Preliminary Design,60%
2.5 Draft Final Design90%)
2.6 Final Desjgn (100%1
2.7 Specifica((ions\Gen Notes, Estimates
3.0 Can){ Bowie at Winthrop (Exhibit 3)
3.1 Data Lollection / Base Mapping
3.2 Survey
3.3 Conceptual Despn 30%)
3.4 PreliminaDesign 60%
3.5 IDraft Finalesjfln 90%)
3.6 IFinal Design (1(10%1
3.7 'Specifications, Gen Notes, Estimates
I
4.0 (Bryant Irvin Sidewalk ;Exhibit 5)
4.1 IData Collection / Base Mapping
4.2 (Survey
4.3 (Conceptual Design 30%)
4.4 IPreliminat‘ Design 60%
4.5 IDraft Final Design 90%)
4.6 Final Design (1 Vol
4.7 I§p cifications, Gen Notes, Estimates
5.0 Pedestrian Crossing Feasibility Study
5.1 (Pedestrian Count
5.2 IPeak Hour Observations
5.3 (Technical Memorandum
6.0 Eryant Irvin at SunsetExhibit 6)
6.1 ba{ta Collection / Base Marvin()
6.2 I Survey
6.3 Ibonce9ual Desjpt30%)
6.4 PreliminacykDes1gn 60%
6.5 IDraft Final Despjp( 90%)
6.6 IFinal Desjp� (1dd/°
6.7 (Specifications, Gen Notes, Estimates
I
7.0 Environmental Document
7.1 Coordination with City
8.0 IEid Phase
8.1 IBid Sup\tt
Sell Contract Documents and Maintain
8.1.1 I Plan Holders List
8.1.2 Issue Addenda
8.1.3 Attend Pre -bid Conference
8.1.4 Attend Bid Opening
8.1.5 Tabulate Bids and Recommend Award
8.1.6 1 Issue Conformed Contract Documents
9.0 tonstruction Phase Services
9.1 Construction Support
9.1.1 Attend eri i n luc#jon Conference
9.1.2 Attend Public Meeting
9.1.3 Project Site Visits
0 4 I Su .
I Request for Information/Change Order
9.1.5 Review
9.1.6 1 Final Walk Through and Punch List
9.2 (Record Drawipps
16.6 (Permitting
10.1 SWPPP
10.2 TxDOT
10.3 YbLR
Totals
Level of Effort Spreadsheet
TASK/HOUR BREAKDOWN
Design Services for
Ridglea Streetscape Improvements
Citv Project. No. 01786
e
Project
Director
$18
jHan
Project
er
155
Enoip,eer
Project
Labor
$125
(hours)
EIT
$105
I CADD
1
$85,
Administrative
$75
Total
Cost
Labor
MWBE
Subconsultant
Non-MWBE
E4
,ense
Travel
Reproduction
P
Total
Cost
Expense
Task
Sub
Total
81 27
0
8
0
8
37,065
$01
$1,200
$0
50
31,200
$8,265
$0
$0
$0
$1,440
$0
$1,440
I
1 -
$31Q
SO
$310
.
$465
$465
$2,080
S0
$2,080
011/
Zr
8
_
4
4
5930
1 50
$930
$310
S0
$310
$920
$0
$920
$610
S0
$610
S0
S0
S0
SO
St.2de
51,200
S1,200
2
101
11
36
OI
0
$7,065
$1,350I
$3,95�
$0
$60
$5,360
$12,425
'
jl
•l
il
4
1
1 $575
�Q
$O
$575
$0
51,;
C
$1,350
51,350
$1,50
SO
$1,505
$1,504
$f,26t'
$20
$1,220
52,725
51,860
$1'
�S!
S1,220
$3,080
11
41
1,1
11
4
)
21
19,,
4,
$1,035
i
k
$1,220
52,255
$585
1
5350
5935
2
9
11
40
of 0
$7,330
$975
$650I
$0
$60
$1,685
$9,015
j
6
5785,
`
$O
$785
50
$41
$975
5975
1
I
a11I41
1j
1
I 2�
21
11
2)
21
41
l)1
j4
11
51,400
$O
$1,400
51,400
$20
520
51,420
$2,280
�j
S345S2,625
$8801\
Ng
$345
$1,225
$585
I
1
SO
$585
2
10
12
40
0
0
$7,610
$975
$0
$0
$60
$1,035
$8,645
1
6
$785
$0
$785
I
2
2
I
$0
S$75
5975
$975
$1,610
I$0
$1,610
$1,890
I
Seir
9j
$20
$1,910
I
I
1
1
3J
41
II
P
41
J I
1
I
$1,860
I
$20
$1,880
$880
520
520
S900
$585
$0
S585
1
I
1
I
$3,330
30
$150
$0
$0
$150
$3,480
1
8
4
12
0
2
$21
$0.
$15Q
$150
$360
$1,04001
$0
$1,040
11
41
4I
41
1
I
I
1
$2,080
1
$0
52,080
2
9
13
35
0
0
37,055
3975
5650
$0J
360
31,685
38,740
I
1
I
4
$575
,
S0
S575
$O
,S,971
$975
5975
51,420
$0
$1,420
I
I
J �J
$1,525
1
$20
S1,545
J
tri4
$345
$2,415
2IS2,07Q�
0
S345
$1,225
1$880
111
21
5585
$0
$585
0
5
0
0
0
0
$775
SO
$O
$0
$0
$O
$775
$775
50
S775
0
7
0
0
0
10
$1,835
$0I
$0
$0
$300
$300
$2,135
$455
$300
$300
S755
I1
1
5305
$0
$305
11
r,
$310
j
I
$O
$310
2)
$155
$0
5155
j
1
1
2
2
5305
50
5305
$305
I
J
$0
$305
0
16
0
6
0
0
$3,110
$0
$0
SO
S0
$0
$3,110
2J
$310
1 '1
$0
$310
$310
1
a
$0
$310
I
J
$775
$0
$775
I
kI
$o
$o
50
N
I
I
laj
--,/
$310
$O
$310
$465
$O
$465
5940
$0
5940
0
7
2
12
0
0
$2,595
$0
SC
$0
$865
$865
$3,460
2
2
$460
50
$460
$1,615
50
$1,615
8
I
2
$520
$865
5865
$1,385
17
108
53
189
Or
20
$47,770
$4,275
$6,600
$0
$1,405
$12,280
$60,050
Pro"ect Summa y
otal Hours 387
Total Labor $47`770
Total Expense $112/2130
DBE Subconsultant $4,275
Non-MWBE Subconsultant $6 600
10% Sub Markup $1 h88
MWBE Participation 7 IWO
Total Project Cost $61,138
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment B - Level of Effort Supplement
PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010
EXHIBIT "B-3"
ENGINEER OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
(Supplement to Attachment B)
Insert opinion of probable construction cost following this page.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment B
PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010
Page 5 of 5
Location No.
Preliminary Opinion of Probably Construction Cost (OPCC)
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements
Intersection Total Cost
1 Camp Bowie at Westridge $ 135,893.00
2 Camp Bowie at Winthrop $ 53,875.00
3 Bryant Irvin Sidewalk $ 62,975.00
4* Bryant Irvin at Sunset $ 67,940.00
5* Bryant Irvin at Milburn $ 40,315.00
Estimated Total Project Costs $ 360,998.00
* Feasibility Study will determine which intersection will be included.
1
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
Location 1 - Camp Bowie Blvd. at Westridge Ave.
Pay Item
Description
1 Remove Ext Sidewalk & Ramps
2 Remove Ext Pavement
3 Remove Ext Valley Gutter
4 Prop Sidewalk
5 Prop Conc Base V Header w/ Accent Brick
6 Prop Sidewalk Ramp w/ Brick
7 Prop Valley Gutter
8 Prop 8" Flex Base
9 Traffic Control
10 Mobilization
Quantity Unit Unit Price
150 SF $ 2.00 $
1976 SF $ 8.00 $
760 SF $ 6.00 $
420 SF $ 6.00 $
1,976 SF $ 30.00 $
400 SF $ 30.00 $
760 SF $ 20.00 $
50 CY $ 10.00 $
1 LS $ 5,000.00 $
1 LS $ 3,000.00 $
Subtotal $
Contingency (%)I 15 $
•
Estimated Total Construction Cost $
* Pay item includes high early strength concrete, sand set paver, and lime stabilization/rock base
+ Pay item includes high early strength concrete and lime stabilization/rock base
Total Cost
300.00
15,808.00
4,560.00
2,520.00
59,280.00
12, 000.00
15,200.00
500.00
5,000.00
3,000.00
118,168.00
17,725.00
135,893.00
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
Location 2 - Camp Bowie Blvd. at Winthrop Ave.
Pay Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Cost
1
2
3
4a*
4b*
4c+
5
6
7
8
9
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Excavation (Roadway)
Enhanced Crosswalk (Thurber Bricks)
Enhanced Crosswalk (New Pavers)
Enhanced Crosswalk (Stamped Concrete)
Removing Concrete (Curb & Gutter)
Barrier Free Ramp
4" Concrete Sidewalk (5' Wide)
Road Repair (Improve Surface and Drainage)
City Utility Adjustments/Relocations
1
1
70
325
325
325
45
3
475
1500
1
LS
MO
CY
S F
S F
S F
LF
EA
S F
S F
LS
Contingency (%)
10% $ 4,100.00
$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
$ 6.00 $ 420.00
$ 15.00 $ 4,875.00
$ 17.00
$ 20.00
$ 5.00 $ 225.00
$ 1,300.00 $ 3,900.00
$ 5.00 $ 2,375.00
$ 15.00 $ 22,500.00
$ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
Subtotal $ 44,895.00
20 $ 8,980.00
Estimated Total Construction Cost $ 53,875.00
* Pay item includes high early strength concrete, sand set paver, and lime stabilization/rock base
+ Pay item includes high early strength concrete and lime stabilization/rock base
1
Pay Item
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
Location 3 - Sidewalk along West Side of Bryant Irvin Rd.
Description
1 Mobilization
2 Traffic Control
3 Excavation (Roadway)
4 Drive Removal, Conc
5 Driveways (Concrete)
6 Removing Concrete (Curb & Gutter)
7 Barrier Free Ramp
8 4" Concrete Sidewalk (5' Wide)
9 4" Concrete Sidewalk (5' Wide) (w/ Integral Retaining Wall)
Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Cost
1 LS 10% $
1 MO $ 2,500.00 $
100 CY $ 6.00 $
275 SF $ 3.00 $
2 EA $ 3,000.00 $
75 LF $ 5.00 $
5 EA $ 1,300.00 $
400 SF $ 5.00 $
1,925 SF $ 15.00 $
Subtotal $
Contingency (%)J 20 $
Estimated Total Construction Cost
J
4,800.00
2,500.00
600.00
825 00
6,000.00
375.00
6,500.00
2,000.00
28, 875.00
52,475.00
10,500.00
62,975.00
1
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
Location 4 - Sidewalk and Mid Block Crossing of Bryant Irvin Rd.
Pay Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Cost
1 Mobilization 1 LS 10% $ 5,400.00
2 Traffic Control 1 1 MO $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
3 Excavation (Roadway) 1 70 CY $ 6.00 $ 420.00
4a* Enhanced Crosswalk (Thurber Bricks) 1 375 SF $ 15.00 $ 5,625.00
4b* Enhanced Crosswalk (New Pavers) 1 375 SF $ 17.00
4c+ Enhanced Crosswalk (Stamped Concrete) 1 375 SF $ 20.00
5 IRemoving Concrete (Curb & Gutter) 1 45 LF $ 5.00 $ 225.00
6 'Barrier Free Ramp 1 3 EA 1 $ 1,300.00 $ 3,900.00
7 14" Concrete Sidewalk (5' Wide) 1 200 SF 1 $ 5.00 $ 1,000.00
8 I In Pavement Flasher System 1 1 LS I $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00
Subtotal $ 59,070.00
Contingency (%)I 15 $ 8,870.00
Estimated Total Construction Cost $ 67,940.00
* Pay item includes high early strength concrete, sand set paver, and lime stabilization/rock base
+ Pay item includes high early strength concrete and lime stabilization/rock base
1
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
Location 5 - Bryant Irvin Rd. at Milburn St.
Pay Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Cost
1 Mobilization 1 LS
2 Traffic Control 1 MO
3 Excavation (Roadway) 70 CY
4a* Enhanced Crosswalk (Thurber Bricks) 500 SF
4b* Enhanced Crosswalk (New Pavers) 500 SF
4c+ lEnhanced Crosswalk (Stamped Concrete) 1 500 SF
5 jRemoving Concrete (Curb & Gutter) 1 45 LF
6 IBarrier Free Ramp 1 3 EA
7 14" Concrete Sidewalk (5' Wide) 1 175 SF
8 (Traffic Signal Modifications 1 1 LS
Contingency (%)
Engineering/Survey
Estimated Total Construction Cost $ 40,315.00
* Pay item includes high early strength concrete, sand set paver, and lime stabilization/rock base
+ Pay item includes high early strength concrete and lime stabilization/rock base
10% $ 2,300.00
$ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
$ 6.00 $ 420.00
$ 15.00 $ 7,500.00
$ 17.00
$ 20.00
$ 5.00 $ 225.00
$ 1,300.00 $ 3,900.00
$ 5.00 $ 875.00
$ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00
Subtotal $ 25,220.00
15 $ 3,790.00
$ 11, 305.00
i
ATTACHMENT "C"
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT
Design Services for
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements
City Project No. 01786
There are no changes to the Standard Agreement.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment C
PMO Release Date: 05.19.2010
Page l of 1
Consulting Contract Schedule Specifications
City of Fort Worth Capital Improvement Program
Attachment D — Project Schedule
FORT WORTH
This PROJECT requires a Tier 3 schedule as defined herein and in the Citu's Schedule Guidance
Document.
D1. CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT: The CONSULTANT shall
prepare schedules for consulting services that meet the requirements described in this
specification, showing by Critical Path Method (CPM) the planned sequence and timing of
the Work associated with the Agreement. All submittals shall be submitted in PDF format,
and schedule files shall also be submitted in native file format (i.e. file formats associated
with the scheduling software). The approved scheduling software systems for creating the
schedule files are:
Primavera (Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY)
Primavera Contractor (Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY)
Microsoft Project (Version 2003/2007 or later or approved by CITY)(PHASING OUT)
D2. BASELINE CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: Following notice -to -proceed, the
CONSULTANT shall develop, submit and review the draft detailed baseline consulting
services schedule with the CITY to demonstrate the CONSULTANT's understanding of the
Agreement requirements and approach for performing the work. The CONSULTANT will
prepare the final detailed baseline consulting services schedule based on CITY comments, if
any, and submit to the CITY no later than the submittal of the first project invoice.
The following guidelines shall be adhered to in preparing the baseline schedule, and as
described in further detail in the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document.
a. The scope shall be subdivided by work breakdown structure (WBS) representing the
tasks, subtasks, and activities associated with delivering the work.
b. The schedule shall accurately describe the major work activities, key milestones, and
dependencies/relationships as appropriate to the work.
c. The schedule should include appropriate meetings, review periods, critical decision
points, including third party utility dependencies and reviewing agencies.
D3. PROGRESS CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: The CONSULTANT shall prepare
and submit monthly to the CITY for approval the updated schedule in accordance with D1
and D2 and the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document inclusive. As the Work progresses,
the CONSULTANT shall enter into the schedule and record actual progress as described in
the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document.
The updated schedule submittal shall also include a concise schedule narrative that
highlights the following, if appropriate and applicable:
• Changes in the critical path,
• Expected schedule changes,
• Potential delays,
• Opportunities to expedite the schedule,
• Coordination issues the CITY should be aware of or can assist with,
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment D
PMO Release Date: 02.15.2011
Page 1 of 2
• Other schedule -related issues that the CONSULTANT wishes to communicate to the
CITY.
D4. PERFORMANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: If the work
accomplished falls behind that scheduled due to factors within the CONSULTANT's
control, the CONSULTANT shall take such action as necessary to improve the progress of
the Work In addition, the CITY may require the CONSULTANT to submit a revised
schedule demonstrating the proposed plan to make up the delay in schedule progress and
to ensure completion of the Work within the allotted Agreement time.
D5. SCHEDULE TIERS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
The requirements for the schedule are determined based on the nature and needs of the
project. The schedule tier for this project is stated at the top of this document.
CONSULTANT shall submit each schedule relying on the CITY's current Schedule
Guidance Document.
D6. SCHEDULE SUBMITTAL AND PAYMENT:
As stated in III.A.(1). of the Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide the information
required by Attachment D. CONSULTANT's monthly invoices will not be accepted and
processed for payment without monthly schedule updates that are submitted in the time
and manner required by Attachment D and the CITY's current Schedule Guidance
Document.
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Attachment D
PMO Release Date: 02.15.2011
Page 2 of 2
City of Fort Worth
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements
ID
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Task Name
)ctober 2011 I November 2411 I December 2011 _ I January 2012 February 2012 I March 2012
10/2 10/9 110/16 110/23 110/30 111/6 111/13 111/20 111/27 112/4 1 12/11 1 12/18 1 12/25 1 1/1 I 1/8 11/15 11/22 1 1/29 1 2/5 1 2/12 [ 2/19 12/26 I 3/4 1 3/11 1 3/18 1 3/25
1. Design Management
2. Camp Bowie at Westridge
2.1 30% PS& E
2.2 City/TxDOT Review
2.3 60% PS & E
2.4 City/TxDOT Review
2.5 90% PS & E
2.6 City/TxDOT Review
2.7 100% PS & E
2.8 City/TxDOT Review
3. Camp Bowie at Winthrop
3.1 30% PS&E
3.2 City/TxDOT Review
3.3 60% PS&E
3.4 City/TxDOT Review
3.5 90% PS&E
3.6 City/TxDOT Review
3.7 100% PS&E
3.8 City/TxDOT Review
4. Bryant Irvin Sidewalk
4.1 30% PS&E
4.2 City/TxDOT Review
4.3 60% PS&E
4.4 City/TxDOT Review
4.5 90% PS&E
4.6 City/TxDOT Review
4.7 100% PS&E
4.8 City/TxDOT Review
5. Pedestrian Crossing Feasibility Study
6. Bryant Irvin at Sunset/Milburn
6.1 30% PS&E
6.2 City/TxDOT Review
6.3 60% PS&E
6.4 City/TxDOT Review
6.5 90% PS&E
6.6 City/TxDOT Review
6.7 100% PS& E
6.8 City/TxDOT Review
7. Environmental Doc Coordination
8. Bid Phase Services
9. Construction Phase Services
10. Survey Services
11. Permitting
Project: Schedule_Ridglea_Street
Date: Mon 10/10/11
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
uo External Milestone O
' ' Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone _
1
C 3
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration -only
t --
April 2012
I May 2(
4/1 1 4/8 14/15 14/22 14/29 1
. 1 1 1 1 I i I I l I I I
Manual Summary Rollup Finish -only
i Manual Summary 1.r . Deadline
Start -only C Progress
3
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 1
City of Fort Worth
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements
ID
Task Name
6
1 1. Design Management
2 2. Camp Bowie at Westridge
3 2.1 30% PS& E
4 2.2 City/TxDOT Review
5 2.360%PS&E
6 2.4 City/TxDOT Review
7 2.590%PS&E
8 2.6 City/TxDOT Review
9 2.7 100% PS & E
10 2.8 City/TxDOT Review
11 3. Camp Bowie at Winthrop
12 3.1 30% PS&E
13 3.2 City/TxDOT Review
14 3.3 60% PS&E
15 3.4 City/TxDOT Review
16 3.5 90% PS&E
17 3.6 City/TxDOT Review
18 3.7 100% PS&E
19 3.8 City/TxDOT Review
20 4. Bryant Irvin Sidewalk
21 4.1 30% PS&E
22 4.2 City/TxDOT Review
23 4.3 60% PS&E
24 4.4 City/TxDOT Review
25 4.5 90% PS&E
26 4.6 City/TxDOT Review
27 4.7 100% PS&E
28 4.8 City/TxDOT Review
29 5. Pedestrian Crossing Feasibility Study
30 6. Bryant Irvin at Sunset/Milburn
31 6.1 30% PS&E
32 6.2 City/TxDOT Review
33 6.3 60% PS&E
34 6.4 City/TxDOT Review
35 6.5 90% PS&E
36 6.6 City/TxDOT Review
37 6.7 100% PS& E
38 6.8 City/TxDOT Review
39 7. Environmental Doc Coordination
40 8. Bid Phase Services
41 9. Construction Phase Services
42 10. Survey Services
43 11. Permitting
Project: Schedule_Ridglea_Street
Date: Mon 10/10/11
Task
Split
Milestone
2012 'June 2012
5/6 5/13 5/20 5/27 6/3 1 6/10
6/17
6/24
NMI
O
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
July 2 12 I Auust 2012 1 September 2012 iOctobv 2.012 I November 2012 I December'
7/1 I 7/8 17/15 17/22 17/29 I 8/5 18/12 18/19 18/26 I 9/2 1 9/9 19/16 9/23 19/30 110/7 1 10/14 1 10/21 110/28 111/4 111/11 111/18 111/25 12/2
rrr
1 I l i 1 I 11 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I 11 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 11 1 I
i External Milestone 0 Inactive Summary Manual Summary Rollup
Inactive Task Manual Task r i Manual Summary
Inactive Milestone Duration -only Start -only
l i l l l l i l l
Finish -only
Deadline
Progress
3
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 2
City of Fort Worth
Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements
ID
Task Name
1 1. Design Management
2 2. Camp Bowie at Westridge
3 2.1 30% PS& E
4 2.2 City/TxDOT Review
5 2.360%PS&E
6 2.4 City/TxDOT Review
7 2.590%PS&E
8 2.6 City/TxDOT Review
9 2.7 100% PS & E
10 2.8 City/TxDOT Review
11 3. Camp Bowie at Winthrop
12 3.1 30% PS&E
13 3.2 City/TxDOT Review
14 3.3 60% PS&E
15 3.4 City/TxDOT Review
16 3.5 90% PS&E
17 3.6 City/TxDOT Review
18 3.7 100% PS&E
19 3.8 City/TxDOT Review
20 4. Bryant Irvin Sidewalk
21 4.1 30% PS&E
22 4.2 City/TxDOT Review
23 4.3 60% PS&E
24 4.4 City/TxDOT Review
25 4.5 90% PS&E
26 4.6 City/TxDOT Review
27 4.7 100% PS&E
28 4.8 City/TxDOT Review
29 5. Pedestrian Crossing Feasibility Study
30 6. Bryant Irvin at Sunset/Milburn
31 6.1 30% PS&E
32 6.2 City/TxDOT Review
33 6.3 60% PS&E
34 6.4 City/TxDOT Review
35 6.5 90% PS&E
36 6.6 City/TxDOT Review
37 6.7 100% PS& E
38 6.8 City/TxDOT Review
39 7. Environmental Doc Coordination
40 8. Bid Phase Services
41 9. Construction Phase Services
42 10. Survey Services
43 11. Permitting
Project: Schedule_Ridglea_Street
Date: Mon 10/10/11
Task
Split
Milestone
it2912
12/9
1 Janu 2013 F 201 arch 2013 'April 2013
12/161 12/231 12/30 1/6 1/13 1/20 1/27 2/3 2/10 2/17 2/241 3/3 1 3/10 1 3/17 13/24 1 3/31 4/7
May 2013_ !June 2013 1 July 2013
4/14 1 4/21 1 4/28 I 5/5 1-5/12 1 5/19 1 5/26 1 6/2 1 6/9 16/16 1 6/23 1 6/30 1 7/7 1
111111111111 I Ili I=• 11 1111 111111 r 1 ■I OMMEMNEMINIMMEMMESu
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration -only
Manual Summary Rollup Finish -only
1 Manual Summary Deadline
Start -only C Progress
NW I, vimbESI wmiu,
•
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Page 3
10/9/2011 11: 38am
ATTACHMENT E
RIDGLEA URBAN VILLAGE
STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 01786
F�RT WORTH
PROJECT AREAS (MAPSCO 74—L,M,R)
S
ors
•••
•
•.03
r
•
t. r
•
i
tr
•
ri as ¥Sts �'�
�-4 A )4
I opt ft)
•
t
Pr A
1
•
a
•
4
al
'1
••
•
1.1" 4
•.
.•
4
•
•
T
•
•
.. , all .- , }
f �.7 . s
tail # tea " at
il `
1 : el
3 ) samil
it -'
• 441l
�i a
y
•
I'
4tilA4
_1
PROJECT AREAS
KGmleyFlorn
and Associates, Inc.
TBPE FIRM NO. 928
1
•
M&C - Council Agenda Page 1 of 2
City of Fort Worth, Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 11/1/2011
DATE: Tuesday, November 01, 2011
LOG NAME: 06RIDGLEASTRIMPT
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE NO.: **C-25254
Authorize Execution of an Engineering Services Agreement in the Amount of $61,138.00 with Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc., for Design of the Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Improvements Project
(COUNCIL DISTRICT 3)
RECOMMENDATION.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of an Engineering Services Agreement in
an amount not to exceed $61,138.00 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the design of the Ridglea
Urban Village Streetscape Improvements Project.
DISCUSSION:
The Land Use/Transportation Joint Venture Program is an initiative of the North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG) and the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) to improve regional air quality
and promote sustainable development. The program provides funding for transportation projects that
support private mixed use development within a pedestrian -and/or transit -oriented environment. The Joint
Venture Program is a precursor to the 2005 and 2009 Sustainable Development Program that calls for
projects.
On October 11, 2001, the RTC selected the Ridglea Urban Village Project for funding in the amount of
$380 349.00 in federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds through the Land
Use/Transportation Joint Venture Program. On June 17, 2003, (M&C G-13994) the City Council
authorized the City Manager to execute a Local Project Advance Funding Agreement (LPAFA) with Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT), but at that time funding was not yet accepted or appropriated via
Council action The City entered into a new LPAFA with TxDOT to correct an error in the previously
accepted LPAFA. On December 8, 2009, (M&C G-16766) the City Council authorized the City Manager to
execute the corrected LAPFA with TxDOT and authorized the City Manager to accept the $380,349.00 in
federal CMAQ funds from TxDOT for a Pedestrian Improvement Project in the Ridglea Urban Village
The delay between 2001 and 2009 was due to several factors. The original development and local match
was withdrawn by the developer in 2003. Camp Bowie District, Inc., agreed to provide the local match in
2003 after the original developer could no longer provide the match. In 2005, the Ridglea Urban Village
was awarded federal funds for an Urban Village Master Plan. Camp Bowie District, Inc., requested that the
Streetscape Project be delayed until completion of the Master Plan, so as to better reflect local aspirations
captured in the Master Plan. In December 2007, the Ridglea Master Plan was adopted. However, at that
time Transportation and Public Works (TPW) started a signalization project along Camp Bowie Boulevard
that overlapped the Ridglea Urban Village Streetscape Project. Because of the overlap, it was again
determined that the Streetscape Project should be delayed to ensure coordination with the signalization
project. Since December 2009, Planning and Development has worked with Camp Bowie District, Inc., to
scope the project, while working with appropriate TPW staff to coordinate improvements in the Ridglea
Urban Village. Design and necessary TxDOT review for this project is estimated to take approximately one
year. Construction will follow in 2013.
Camp Bowie District, Inc., has pledged to provide a cash contribution of $95,087.00 as the 20 percent
local match for this project of which the Camp Bowie District, Inc., has already paid $11 410 00 to TxDOT.
http://apps.cfwnet.org/ecouncil/printmc.asp?id=15990&print=true&DocType=Print 11/02/2011
M&C - Council Agenda Page 2 of 2
Camp Bowie District, Inc.'s remaining financial responsibility is $83,677.00 to fulfill the required match.
The Purchasing Division issued a Request for Qualification (RFQ) on May 25, 2011 soliciting qualified
firms to provide the necessary design and engineering services in accordance with the scope of work
specifications terms, and conditions as directed by the City. The evaluation factors included project
understanding, project manager and project team capability, proposed schedule and current capacity, and
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (D/BE). An evaluation panel was made up of representatives from
Transportation and Public Works, Planning and Development, Fort Worth Transportation Authority (The
T), and Housing and Economic Development. Proposals were received from six vendors The
recommended vendor, Kimley-Horn was determined to be the most qualified to perform the services
required.
The scope of work for this project consists of design and preparation of construction plans and contract
documents for construction of sidewalks, enhanced pedestrian crosswalks, and ADA compliant wheelchair
ramps. Improvements may also include pedestrian crossing signalization and signage; landscape areas
and drainage and installation of transit shelters as necessary. The project is federally funded and located
primarily on an on -system roadway. Therefore, the project must meet TxDOT requirements. The project
locations are identified in the attached Ridglea M&C.odf.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., proposed to provide the necessary design and engineering services for
a lump sum fee of $61,138.00. City Staff considers this fee to be fair and reasonable for the scope of
services proposed.
BID ADVERTISEMENT — This bid was advertised in the Fort Worth Star -Telegram on Wednesdays from
May 25, 2011 through June 22, 2011, the Commercial Recorder on Wednesdays from May 25, 2011
through June 15, 2011 and the Black Voice on Thursdays from May 26, 2011 to June 16, 2011.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., is in compliance with the City's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
(D/BE) Ordinance by committing to seven percent D/BE participation on this project. The City's D/BE goal
on the project is five percent.
This project is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 3.
FISCAL INFORMATION / CERTIFICATION:
The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current capital
budget, as appropriated, of the Grants Capital Project Fund.
FUND CENTERS:
TO Fund/Account/Centers FROM Fund/Account/Centers
GR74 531200 006302418300 $61.138.00
CERTIFICATIONS:
Submitted for Citv Manager's Office bv:
Originating Department Head:
Additional Information Contact:
Fernando Costa (6122)
Randle Harwood (6101)
Noah Heath (2536)
ATTACHMENTS
1. Contract Compliance Memo for DBE pdf (CFW Internal)
2. Grant Fundinq Availabilitv.pdf (CFW Internal)
3. Ridqlea M&C pdf (Public)
http://apps.cfwnet.org/ecouncil/printmc.asp?id=15990&print=true&DocType=Print 11/02/2011
Exhi�u� i
Project Location
d
4
•
Camp Bowie & Westridge:
Pedestrian Crosswalk Location
Legend
Ridglea Urban Village
1 Description
® Enhanced Pedestrian Crosswalk
Ramp / Sidewalk Construction
Landscape/Parking Reconstruction
Close Drive Add Curb and Gutter
Drainage
Construct New Sidewalk &
Pedestrian Crosswalk
a
Construct New Sidewalk
Bryan Irvin:
Mid -Block Pedestrian
Crosswalk Location
Bryan Irvin & Milburn:
Pedestrian Crosswalk Location
.� ,4
•.i� i&L. :r T
J Tim...
� J• .6°�';
11.
<.
ft
ye
i
b
r
Or a
• . 4
1M0Uc'IIITO`N AVE
ta
1/234.
P_
4
ILPATRI:CK AVE
1 1
COPYRIGHT 2011 CITY OF FORT WORTH UNAUTHORIZED REPRODUCTION IS AVIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAWS.
THIS DATA IS TO BE USED FORA GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION ONLY. THE ACCURACY IS NOT TO BE TAKEN /
USED AS DATA PRODUCED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES OR BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR. THE CITY OF FORT WORTH ASSUMES NO RESPON SIBIUTY FOR THE ACCURACY OF SAID DATA.
I U U
0 125 250 500
1
750
I Fe et
1,000
•
a