Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 43893 (2)CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT Mo CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This AGREEMENT is between the City of Fort Worth, a Texas home -rule municipality the "CITY"), and Teague, Nall & Perkins, Inc., authorized to do business in Texas, an independent contractor ("Consultant"), for a PROJECT generally described as: Chapel Creek Boulevard at IH 30 Bridge Replacement. Article I Scope of Services (1) Consultant hereby agrees to perform as an independent contractor the services set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Attachment "A". These services shall be performed in connection with Chapel Creek Boulevard at IH 30 Bridge Replacement. (2) Additional services, if any, will be requested in writing by the City. City shall not pay for any work performed by Consultant or its subconsultants, subcontractors and/or suppliers that has not been ordered in writing. It is specifically agreed that Consultant shall not be compensated for any alleged additional work resulting from oral orders of any person. Article II Compensation Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the Fee Schedule shown in Attachment "B". Payment shall be considered full compensation for all labor, materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to complete the services described in Attachment "A". However the total fee paid by the City shall not exceed a total of $563,730.92 unless the City and the Consultant mutually agree upon a fee amount for additional services and amend this Agreement accordingly. The Consultant shall provide monthly invoices to the City. Payment for services rendered shall be due within thirty (30) days of the uncontested performance of the particular services so ordered and receipt by City of Consultant's invoice for payment of same. Acceptance by Consultant of said payment shall operate as and shall release the City from all claims or liabilities under this Agreement for anything related to, done, or furnished in connection with the services for which payment is made, including any act or omission of the City in connection with such services. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services PMO Official Release Date: 08/09/2012 Page 1 of 8 OFFICIAL RECOR®' CITY SECRETARY T. WORTH, T31 11-09-12 PO4:34 IN 11-19-12 A11:16 IN Article III Term Unless terminated pursuant to the terms herein, this Agreement shall be for a term of 33 months, beginning upon the date of its execution, or until the completion of the subject matter contemplated herein, whichever occurs first. Article IV Independent Contractor Consultant shall operate hereunder as an independent contractor, and not as an officer, agent, servant, or employee of the City. Consultant shall have exclusive control of and the exclusive right to control the details of its work to be performed hereunder and all persons performing same, and shall be solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors. The doctrine of respondent superior shall not apply as between City and Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors, and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between City and Consultant. Article V Professional Competence and Indemnification (1) Work performed by Consultant shall comply in all aspects with all applicable local, state and federal laws and with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the local, state and national boards, bureaus and agencies. Approval by the City shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant or its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of its services performed hereunder. (2) In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Section 271.904, the Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City against liability for any damage caused by or resulting from an act of negligence, intentional tort, intellectual property infringement, or failure to pay a subcontractor or supplier committed by the Consultant or Consultant's agent, consultant under contract, or another entity over which the Consultant's exercises control. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services PMO Official Release Date: 08/09/2012 Page 2 of 8 Article VI I iWVTM1iM;� (1) Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required under this Article and the City has approved such insurance, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all similar insurance of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approval given by the City; provided, however, Consultant may elect to add any subconsultant as an additional insured under its liability policies. Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 each accident (or reasonably equivalent limits of coverage if written on a split limits basis). Coverage shall be on any vehicle used in the course of the Project. Worker's Compensation Coverage A: statutory limits Coverage B: $100,000 each accident $500,000 disease - policy limit $100,000 disease - each employee (2) Additional Insurance Requirements a. Except for employer's liability insurance coverage under Consultant's worker's compensation insurance policy, the City, its officers, employees and servants shall be endorsed as an additional insured on Consultant's insurance policies. b. Certificates of insurance shall be delivered to the Transportation and Public Works Department Attention: Mr. Michael Weiss, P.E., 1000 Throckmorton Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102, prior to commencement of work. c. Any failure on part of the City to request required insurance documentation shall not constitute a waiver of the insurance requirements specified herein. d. Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to provide the City a minimum thirty days notice of cancellation, non -renewal, and/or material change in policy terms or coverage. A ten days notice shall be acceptable in the event of non-payment of premium. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services PMO Official Release Date: OS/09/2012 Page 3 of 8 e. Insurers must be authorized to do business in the State of rTexas and have a current A.M. Best rating of A: VII or equivalent measure of financial strength and solvency. f. Other than worker's compensation insurance, in lieu may consider alternative coverage or risk treatment pools or risk retention groups. The City must approve coverage. of traditional insurance, City measures through insurance Ive in writing any alternative g. Workers' compensation insurance policy(s) covering employees employed on the Project shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation providing rights of recovery in favor of the City. h. City shall not be responsible for the direct payment of insurance premium costs for Consultant's insurance. i. Consultant's insurance policies shall each be endorsed to provide that such insurance is primary protection and any self -funded or commercial coverage maintained by City shall not be called upon to contribute to loss recovery. j. In the course of the Agreement, Consultant shall report, in a timely manner, to City's officially designated contract administrator any known loss occurrence which could give rise to a liability claim or lawsuit or which could result in a property loss. k. Consultant's liability shall not be limited to the specified amounts of insurance required herein. Upon the request of City, Consultant shall provide complete copies of all insurance policies required by these Agreement documents. Article VII Transfer or Assignment City and Consultant each bind themselves, and their lawful successors and assigns, to this Agreement. Consultant, its lawful successors and assigns, shall not assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without prior written consent of the City. Article VIII Termination of Contract (1) City may terminate this Agreement for its convenience on 30 days' written notice. Either the City or the Consultant for cause may terminate this Agreement if either Party fails substantially to perform through no fault of the other and does not City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services PMO Official Release Date: 08/09/2012 Page 4 of 8 commence correction of such nonperformance with 5 days of written notice and diligently complete the correction thereafter (2) If City chooses to terminate this Agreement under Article 8, upon receipt of notice of termination, Consultant shall discontinue services rendered up to the date of such termination and City shall compensate Consultant based upon calculations in Article 2 of this Agreement and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. (3) All reports, whether partial or complete, prepared under this Agreement, including any original drawings or documents, whether furnished by the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, or contractors, or prepared by Consultant, shall be or become the property of the City, and shall be furnished to the City prior to or at the time such services are completed, or upon termination or expiration of this Agreement. Article IX Right to Audit (1) Consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of Consultant involving transactions relating to this Agreement. Consultant agrees that the City shall have access during normal working hours to all necessary facilities and shall be provided adequate and appropriate workspace in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this section. City shall give Consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audits. (2) Consultant further agrees to include in all its subcontracts hereunder, a provision to the effect that the subcontracting consultant agrees that the City shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under the subcontract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of such sub -consultant, involving transactions to the subcontract, and further, that City shall have access during normal working hours to all sub - consultant facilities, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the provisions of this article. City shall give Consultant and any sub -consultant reasonable advance notice of intended audit. (3) Consultant and sub -consultants agree to photocopy such documents as may be requested by the City. The City agrees to reimburse Consultant for the cost of copies at the rate published in the Texas Administrative Code in effect as of the time copying is performed. City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services PMO Official Release Date: 08/09/2012 Page 5 of 8 interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments or exhibits hereto. Article XIV Severability The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section or other part of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall ever be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or other part of this Agreement to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid or unconstitutional portion had never been contained therein. Article XV Notices Notices to be provided hereunder shall be sufficient if forwarded to the other Party by hand -delivery or via U.S. Postal Service certified mail return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the address of the other Party shown below: City of Fort Worth Attn: Transportation and Public Works Department 1000 Throckmorton Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Consultant: Teague, Nall &Perkins, Inc. Attn: Ty Hilton 1100 Macon Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 Article XVI Headings The headings contained herein are for the convenience in reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services PMO Official Release Date: 08/09/2012 Page 7 of 8 Article XVII Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and each counterpart shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. Executed and effective this the,)6/7�bay of/U'f , 2012. BY: BY: CITY OF FORT WORTH ENGINEER Teague, Nall &Perkins, Inc. Fernando Costa T Assistant City Manager Vice Date: i/�� iZ Date: APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: By: Dougla�s'W. Wiersig, P.E. Director, Transportation/Pub Works Department APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY By: Douglas W. Black Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Mary J. Ka(y� City Secretary City of Fort Worth, Texas Standard Agreement for Professional Services PMO Official Release Date: 08/09/2012 Page 8 of 8 resident o 1,31112, M&C No.: C-25937 M&C Date: October 23, 2012 OFFICIAL RETARY CITY SCR FT. WORTR+ Tx ATTACHMENT SCOPE OF SERVICES Design Services for the Replacement of the Chapel Creek Blvd. Bridge over IH 30 City Project No. 0901 Scope for Engineering Design Related Services for Street Improvements The scope set forth herein defines the work to be performed by the ENGINEER in completing the project. Both the CITY and ENGINEER have attempted to clearly define the work to be performed and address the needs of the Project. OBJECTIVE The following scope of services covers the work to prepare a Geometric Schematic and Environmental Document for TxDOT and FHWA approval / clearance. Plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) will then be developed in TxDOT format for the State -let project. The proposed improvements consist of widening or replacing the Chapel Creek Boulevard Bridge over IH 30 and reconstruction of approach roadways affected by bridge improvements. The new bridge will be a minimum of five lanes wide plus accessible sidewalk and bicycle lanes. Work on approach roadways and frontage roads is assumed to be limited to 200 feet or less. Traffic signals are planned at both frontage road intersections. WORK TO BE PERFORMED Task 1. Design Management Task 2. Geometric Schematic Task 3. Environmental Documentation Task 4. Conceptual Design (30%) Task 5. Preliminary Design (60%) Task 6. Final Design (90%) Task 7. Bid Phase Services Task 8. Construction Phase Services Task 9. ROW/Easement Services Task 10.Survey and Subsurface Utility Engineering Services Task 11.Permitting TASK I. DESIGN MANAGEMENT. ENGINEER will manage the work outlined in this scope to ensure efficient and effective use of ENGINEER's and CITY's time and resources. ENGINEER will manage change, communicate effectively, coordinate internally and externally as needed, and proactively address issues with the CITY's Project Manager and others as necessary to make progress on the work. 1.1. Managing the Team City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 1 of 30 • Lead, manage and direct design team activities • Ensure quality control is practiced in performance of the work • Communicate internally among team members • Task and allocate team resources 1.2. Communications and Reporting • Attend apre-design project kickoff/chartering meeting with CITY and TxDOT staff to confirm and clarify scope, understand CITY objectives, and ensure economical and functional designs that meet CITY requirements • Conduct and document monthly project update meetings with CITY Project Manager • Conduct review meetings with the CITY and TxDOT at the end of each design phase • Conduct and document biweekly design team meetings. • Prepare invoices, in accordance with Attachment B to this Standard Agreement and submit monthly in the format requested by the CITY. • Prepare and submit monthly progress reports in the format provided by the respective CITY Department. • Prepare and submit baseline Project Schedule initially, and Project Schedule updates with a schedule narrative monthly, as required in Attachment D to this Standard Agreement and according to the City of Fort Worth's Schedule Guidance Document. • Complete Monthly M/WBE Report Form and Final Summary Payment Report Form at the end of the project • Coordinate with other agencies and entities as necessary for the design of the proposed infrastructure, and provide and obtain information needed to prepare the design • With respect to coordination with permitting authorities, ENGINEER shall communicate with permng authorities such that their regulatory requirements are appropriately reflected in the designs. ENGINEER shall work through TxDOT to accomplish regulatory agency approvals for the proposed improvement, and make changes necessary to meet their requirements, as part of the design scope. • Personnel and Vehicle Identification: When conducting site visits to the project location, the ENGINEER or any of its sub -consultants shall carry readily visible information identifying the name of the company and the company representative. ASSUMPTIONS • A contract duration of 36 months is assumed for the purpose of determining the number of monthly status reports and update meetings. • "Shovel ready" schedule milestone is assumed to define the project as having met 3 individual milestones —Environmental clearance, 90% complete construction documents, and completed utility coordination. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 2 of 30 DELIVERABLES A. Meeting summaries with action items B. Monthly invoices C. Monthly progress reports D. Baseline design schedule E. Monthly schedule updates with schedule narrative describing any current or anticipated schedule changes F. Monthly MN/BE Report Form and Final Summary Payment Report Form TASK 2. GEOMETRIC SCHEMATIC 2.0 Design Concept Conference (DCC) • Prepare draft Design Summary Report (DSR). • Participate in and document the DCC prior to beginning preliminary schematic development. • Revise Design Summary Report (DSR) to reflect discussion and decisions at the DCC. 2.1 Develop Typical Sections. • Existing typical sections will be based on as -built plans and existing traffic lane configurations. • Proposed typical sections will be based on pavement design and design Traffic projections provided by TxDOT, Functional classcation and the DSR approved by TxDOT. 2.2 Preliminary Schematic • Horizontal and Vertical Alignments 1) Horizontal alignments and horizontal roadway elements will be designed utilizing GEOPAK and based on the TxDOT Roadway Design manual and the DSR approved by TxDOT. 2) Vertical alignments will be designed utilizing GEOPAK and based on the TxDOT Roadway Design manual and the DSR approved by TxDOT. • Traffic Analysis and Intersection Configuration 1) Based upon traffic data provided by TxDOT, prepare an existing and projected Level of Service analysis to assist in sizing the intersections and facility. 2) Develop intersection layout alternatives for major street crossings. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 3 of 30 3) Evaluate intersection alternatives and present evaluation to CITY and TxDOT for approval of preferred alternative to include in Preliminary Schematic. 4) Prepare warrant studies for both frontage road intersections. • Driveway Access -Evaluate existing and proposed access as outlined in TxDOT's Access Management Manual. • Prepare Preliminary Cross Sections 1) Roadway cross sections will be created utilizing GEOPAK at a spacing no less than 100 feet with additional sections at points of interest to include but not limited to driveway locations, cross street locations, cross drainage structures, and pavement transition locations. 2) Existing ground cross sections will be developed based on the DTM data developed by the ENGINEER for this project. 3) Proposed roadway cross sections will be developed based on the proposed typical sections and design horizontal and vertical alignments. 4) Preliminary earthwork calculations will be performed to include in the cost opinion. • ROW 1) Existing ROW limits will be determined by the ENGINEER and shown on the Schematic and in the grading cross sections. 2) Additional ROW needs will be shown on the Schematic and in the grading cross sections. 3) Property ownerships and parcel descriptions will be researched and depicted on the schematic. 4) Drainage and construction easements will be determined and depicted on the schematic. • Utilities 1) Identify potential probable horizontal and vertical utility conflicts based on existing utility information provided by utility owners. 2) Conflict identification shall be limited in scope and only for use in determining potential project costs associated with relocation. • Drainage 1) Delineate limits of FEMA floodplains on schematic based on the latest available information from FEMA. 2) Hydrology (discharge calculations) —Calculate discharges using Rational method for drainage areas less than 200 acres, and TxDOT Rural Regression Equations for Drainage Areas greater than 200 acres. Engineer will validate accuracy of rural regression equation discharges by providing HEC-HMS discharge calculations for drainage areas greater than 200 acres. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 4 of 30 3) Provide drainage area map in Microstation V8 format based on USGS mapping for cross -drainage structures only. This file is for reference only and the drainage areas will not be shown in the schematic. 4) Provide HEGRAS models of existing and proposed conditions at FEMA studied streams, bridges and bridge class culverts. The proposed models will meet FEMA criteria of a maximum rise of 1' at any stream cross-section in comparison of proposed to existing conditions, or zero rise if the proposed improvements encroach on a regulatory floodway. Adherence with this requirement will eliminate the need for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). 5) Design cross -drainage structures using TxDOT Culvert Program (or other TxDOT approved program) for the proposed highway and confirm that cross - drainage structures are adequately sized for the design storm. 6) Generate culvert profiles for cross drainage box culvert structures to confirm adequate roadway cover and to confirm limits of construction at culvert ends. Culvert profiles will be used to confirm that proposed ROW is adequate at culvert ends or to determine limits of proposed grading easements, if applicable. 7) Proposed drainage outfalls to existing streams will be checked for the potential of high velocities and erosion potential. Preliminary proposed contours at the outfalls will be developed to insure that the limits of construction are within the ROW or to determine if additional proposed ROW or proposed easements are required at outfall locations. 8) Preliminary ditch grades will be investigated to insure that positive drainage is provided to outfalls and to ensure that the proposed ditch grading is contained within the proposed ROW. 9) Design of Water Quality ponds or other water quality treatment features, SW3P controls (both temporary and permanent) will not be included in this scope. 2.3 Geometric Schematic • Preliminary Schematic Review: The Preliminary Schematic will be submitted to the District Office as the Draft Geometric Schematic for review and comment by TxDOT. • are Geometric Schematic for submittal to District and Division adhering to the TxDOT Schematic Checklist. The ENGINEER will refine the Preliminary Schematic based on a compiled list of comments from the Fort Worth District, Area Office, Design Division, FHWA, Public Meeting, and Public Hearing to produce the Final Geometric Schematic suitable for District and Division submittal. 1) Refine proposed typical sections 2) Refine horizontal and vertical alignments City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 5 of 30 3) Refine preliminary cross sections 4) Refine ROW 5) Update utility conflicts 6) Refine drainage analysis 7) Update cost estimates • Receive and Address District and Division review comments. • Prepare Final Geometric Schematic for Division Approval. • Secure TxDOT and FHWA Design Schematic Approvals. ASSUMPTIONS • The existing bridge will be widened or totally reconstructed to essentially the same grade. Therefore, the project limits on the approach roadways will not exceed 200 feet. • TxDOT has sufficient traffic data for the ENGINEER to perform the analysis. The ENGINEER will not be required to obtain traffic counts or calculate traffic projections. DELIVERABLES A. Design Summary Report B. Memorandum addressing access management issues C. Preliminary Cross Sections D. Preliminary Schematic E. Geometric Schematic F. Memorandum addressing potential utility conflicts G. Drainage Report H. Traffic Signal Warrant Study for the two frontage road intersections TASK 3. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION The scope of services consists of environmental data collection, site reconnaissance, and the preparation of a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) document. The document will be prepared in accordance with the TxDOT's Standards of Uniformity (SOU) for PCEs. Unless otherwise noted, the PCE format and content will follow SOU version dated December 31, 2010, and the type of environmental document needed will be verified through coordination with TxDOT. If the type of environmental document needed is classified by TxDOT differently, then this scope of services will be revised as necessary. The Engineer will also assist TxDOT and the CITY in preparing a Project Scope and Environmental Issue Checklist, as required by TxDOT's new 2012 environmental rules. This City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 6 of 30 checklist will establish timeframes for environmental approval and confirm the level of environmental documentation and coordination required for the proposed project. The scoping document must be completed and approved by the department delegate before project environmental work commences. Upon direction from the CITY, the PCE will be submitted to TxDOT for review and approval. As part of the environmental process, public involvement will consist of: six (6) Meetings with Affected Properties (MAPO), one (1) public meeting (subsequent public meeting outside of NEPA process will be conducted during pre -construction phase. See Section 8), and a Public Hearing will be conducted to satisfy city and state public involvement policies. The following tasks will be conducted as part of the environmental services: 3.0 -Data Collection Collect and review data associated with the project design, project costs, ROW and utilities, traffic, alternatives, surrounding terrain and land use, project area growth, project area employment, census blocks, census block groups, public facilities, soils, waters of the U.S., water quality, floodplains, threatened/endangered species/Natural Diversity Database, habitat assessment, farmland, noise receivers, Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) sensitive receptors, hazardous materials, detours/construction impacts, and indirect and cumulative impacts. 3.1 -Site Reconnaissance This task consists of hours for one two -person crew to conduct site reconnaissance of the project area. This includes performing wetland determination/delineation, conducting a vegetation inventory and wildlife habitat assessment, identifying existing land uses, public facilities, MSAT sensitive receptors, traffic noise receivers, potential displacements, Limited English Proficiency (LEP) population and signage, and noting the locations of known and potential hazardous materials facilities. 3.2 -PCE Document Preparation A PCE document for the proposed project will be prepared. The format shall follow the format specified in the SOUs which includes sections including: • Description of Proposed Action 1) Project description 2) Project need and purpose 3) General ROW and utility adjustments 4) Project cost estimate 5) Traffic projections • Discussion of Existing Facility 1) Detailed description of the existing facility City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 7 of 30 2) Discussion of the project's surrounding terrain and land uses • Alternatives Analysis 1) Description of the Build Alternative, its advantages, and disadvantages 2) Description of the No Build Alternative, its advantages, and disadvantages • The Potential Social, Economic, and Environmental Effects of the Proposed Action 1) Regional Growth — A discussion of growth from the regional level down to the project area. 2) Community Cohesion —A discussion of potential relocations (if any), ROW, and housing. Analysis and discussion of the LEP populations in the project area, a discussion of the reasonable steps to be taken for informing LEP populations of the project, and a discussion of public involvement activities and how they will be/were advertised to the LEP community. 3) Environmental Justice — A detailed analysis of census blocks and block groups in the project area to identify environmental justice populations and a discussion of their potential to be disproportionately impacted by the project. 4) Section 4(f)/Par1Alands —Discussion of parks, cemeteries, and other 4(f) resources in the project area. 5) Public Facilities — A discussion of all public facilities in the project area and how they would be impacted by the project. 6) Lakes, Rivers, and Streams — A discussion of all water crossings, the applicability of the General Bridge Act of 1946, Sections 9 Cl"d 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and whether coordination with the U.S. Coast Guard or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) would be required. 7) Waters of the U.S. — A description of the waters of the U.S. and wetlands in the project area, a listing of the temporary and permanent impacts from the project, a discussion of the applicable USACE Section 404 permits that would be required, and mitigation (if required). 8) Water Quality — A discussion of the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, project best management practices for erosion control, sedimentation control and post construction total suspended solids, the identification of threatened or imperiled waters, and Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System in the project area. 9) Floodplains — Identification of floodplains in the project area, discussion of project floodplain impacts, identification of coordination with the local floodplain administrator and Corridor Development Certificate (if required). 10) Threatened/Endangered Species — A listing of federal and state threatened/endangered species and state species of concern with the potential to occur in the project area, and the determination if any of these species or their habitat would be impacted by the project. Coordination with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department would be conducted if a City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 8 of 30 threatened/endangered species or its habitat is identified within the project area. 11) Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat — Identification and analysis of the types, size, and density of vegetation in the project area, a discussion of the acreage impacted by the project, and proposed mitigation (if required). 12) Historic Resources — Results and discussion of the findings of the database review for historical resources in the project area 13) Archeological Resources — Results and discussion of the findings of the database review for archeological resources in the project area. 14) Invasive Species/Beneficial Landscaping — A discussion of permanent soil erosion control features using TxDOT approved seeding specifications. 15) Prime, Unique, and Special Farmlands —Analysis and discussion of farmlands in the project area, and project impacts. If farmlands would be impacted, coordination with the Natural Resources Conservation Service would be conducted. 16) Air Quality Assessment —This section includes the discussion of project conformity, Congestion Management Process (CMP) and provides a list of CMP projects in the area. A MSATs quantitative analysis will be also conducted. Due to recent FHWA requirements, the air quality discussion may need additional updating at various project milestones. 17) Traffic Noise — It is anticipated that a detailed traffic noise analysis will not be required. 18) Hazardous materials — Analysis and discussion of known and potential hazardous material facilities in the project area and their potential to adversely affect the subsurface conditions of the project. 19) Visual Impacts — Discussion of aesthetic effects resulting from the project. 20) Construction Impacts — Discussion of construction phasing, access control, detours, and temporary air quality impacts. 21) Items of Special Nature — Discussion of the applicability of Airway -Highway Clearance, wild and scenic rivers, and State Coastal Zone Management Program. 22) Indirect Effects Analysis and Discussion — An indirect and cumulative impact analysis is not anticipated for this project. • Conclusion Statement that the project would have a no significant environmental impacts as described in 23 CFR 771.117 (a) and does not involve any unusual circumstances as described in 23 CFR 771.117 (b). • Exhibits/Attachments Preparation (where applicable) City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04,09,2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 9 of 30 1) Project Location Map 2) U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Map 3) Aerial Photograph 4) Typical Sections 5) Project Layout 6) Waters of the U.S. Map (if applicable) 7) Project Area Photographs 8) Wetland Determination Data Forms (Great Plains Region) (if applicable) 9) MSAT Sensitive Receptors Location Map (if applicable) 10) Hazardous Materials Site Location Map 11) Indirect Effects Area of Interest Build Alternative/No Build Alternative Maps 12) Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Documentation 13) Impact Calculation Worksheets 14) Coordination Documents (if coordination has occurred with any specific agencies) 15) Detour Map (if applicable) 16) Initial Site Assessment checklists, project coordination request (PCR) for historic resource coordination and an archeological background review SOU checklist • Document QA/QC Peer review of project deliverables by the Project Manager and Senior Environmental Scientist at various project milestones. • Address PCE Review Comments Hours to address PCE review comments received from the City of Fort Worth, TxDOT Fort Worth District, TxDOT Environmental Affairs (ENV), and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). It is assumed that three review cycles will be required to incorporate TxDOT ENV review comments and two review cycles will be required to incorporate FHWA review comments. 3.3 -Public Involvement • Meeting with Affected Property Owners 1) Mailing List and TNP and TxDOT Coordination 2) Prepare MAPO Summary Documentation —This includes documentation of the MAPO and addressing comments presented by the public (if any). City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 10 of 30 3) Address environmental related questions/comments during MAPO process for inclusion into summary document. ■ TxDOT Fort Worth District comments (one round) ■ TxDOT ENV comments (one round) ■ FHWA comments (one round) 3.4 —Public Meeting • A public meeting will be conducted to obtain public input on the Engineer's recommended alternative. This meeting will occur after alternative development and prior to refinement of the preliminary plan for TxDOT review submittals. This is to capture public opinion and incorporate final modifications prior to submitting the draft Geometric Schematic for TxDOT review process and approvals. • The ENGINEER shall prepare project exhibits, and attend public meeting to help explain the proposed project to residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location, prepare and mail the invitation letters to the affected customers. The ENGINEER shall coordinate with the CITY GIS staff to identify affected property owners/residents and develop a spreadsheet listing addresses of those to invite to the public meeting. • The ENGINEER will prepare an advertisement document that meets TxDOT requirements for CITY advertisement. • The CITY shall advertise the public meeting according to TxDOT Environmental Manual guidelines and provide evidence of advertisement to ENGINEER for inclusion in the public meeting summary report. • The ENGINEER will prepare a public meeting summary report for TxDOT review and inclusion in the environmental document. The report will contain the following • Purpose of Meeting • Proposed Improvements • Proceeding Summary • Summary and Response to written and oral comments obtained at the meeting. • Recommendations • Attachments • Advertisements • Photographs • Displays • Written Comments • Attendance City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 11 of 30 3.5 — Public Hearing • A Public Hearing shall not be included in the scope of service. • An opportunity for Public Hearing will be advertised to determine if any interested citizens desire the CITY or TxDOT to hold a public hearing. • The ENGINEER will provide the CITY language for their placement of Legal Notice to Afford Opportunity for Public Hearing. • The ENGINEER shall assist the CITY with response to Legal Notice to Afford a Public Hearing. ASSUMPTIONS • TxDOT will afford an opportunity for Public Hearing and if no requests are obtained, services by the ENGINEER to support and deliver a Public Hearing will not be performed. • A Public Hearing will be considered additional work. • The following items are not anticipated work to environmentally clear the Chapel Creek Blvd project and are considered additional work: • A presence/absence survey for federally endangered vertebrates will not be required. If the results of the habitat assessments indicate that a survey(s) is necessary, or the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service determines one or more surveys are needed, it (or they) will be accomplished under a separate scope and budget. • Section 7 consultations under the Endangered Species Act are not included in this scope of services. Section 7 consultation, if deemed necessary, will be accomplished under a separate scope and budget. • Activities associated with an Individual Section 404 (Clean Water Act) permit, pre -construction notification, and/or mitigation planning and formal coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are not included in this scope of services. • This scope does not include an archeological survey for the proposed projectI testing and/or mitigation of sites. Field survey, testing and/or mitigation would be conducted under a separate scope and budget. • This scope does not include ahistoric-age resource survey. • All necessary land access will be secured by the ENGINEER or CITY. • Any mitigation plan that may be required as a result of regulatory coordination or consultation will be done under a separate scope and budget. • A PCE is expected to be adequate to meet TxDOT and FHWA requirements. If a different type of environmental document is deemed necessary, the additional work involved to prepare another type of City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 12 of 30 environmental document will be done under a separate scope and budget. • This scope of services does not include a quantitative Mobile Source Air Toxics analysis. • Section 4(f) and 6(f) documents are not included with this scope of services. • Hazardous materials investigations are limited to a database search and completion of a TxDOT initial site assessment form. If additional work is warranted, it would be conducted under a separate scope and budget. • If applicable, hazardous materials sampling, asbestos survey, or lead -based paint survey. • Any additional site reconnaissance and/or associated revisions to survey report(s), required due to changes in the project design. • Noise workshop. • Expert representation at legal proceedings or at contested permit hearings. DELIVERABLES 1) Reproduce and assimilate 52 copies of the PCE (six cycles) 2) Reproduce and assimilate15 copies of the MAPO summary document (four cycles) 3) Public Meeting displays 4) Public Meeting and Afford Opportunity for Public Hearing advertisements (in TXDOT specified format) 5) Public Meeting Summary for attachment to deliverable 1, PCE document (above). 6) Microsoft Word and Adobe Portable Document File (PDF) format digital files of the PCE and supporting documents. TASK 4. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN (30 PERCENT). The Conceptual Design shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project Schedule. The purpose of the conceptual design is for the ENGINEER to identify, develop, communicate through the defined deliverables, and recommend the design concept that successfully addresses the design problem, and to obtain the CITY's endorsement of this concept. ENGINEER will develop the conceptual design of the infrastructure as follows. 4.1. Data Collection City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 13 of 30 • In addition to data obtained from the CITY, ENGINEER will research and make efforts to obtain pertinent information to aid in coordination of the proposed improvements with any planned future improvements that may influence the project. ENGINEER will also identify and seek to obtain data for existing conditions that may impact the project including; utilities, agencies (TxDOT, County, School District, and railroads), City Master Plans, and property ownership as available from the Tax Assessor's office. • The data collection efforts will also include conducting special coordination meetings with affected property owners and businesses. 4.2. Geotechnical Investigation/Pavement Design Fourteen borings totaling 280 feet of drilling are included in this scope of work. No. of Borings Depth per Boring (feet) Location 2 40 In the area of the proposed bridge abutments. 4 30 In the area of the proposed retaining wall. 8 10 In the area of proposed approach paving. (*) Note: Borings will be drilled to depth indicated or refusal, whichever is shallower. Field personnel will drill the borings using truck mounted equipment. Cohesive and Non -cohesive soil samples will be obtained using three inch diameter Shelby tube samplers (ASTM D-1587) and two inch diameter standard split -spoon samplers (ASTM D-1586), respectively. Rock samples for the 30 and 40 foot borings will be cored. TCP tests will be performed at 5 foot intervals. An engineering geologist or soils technician will extrude the samples in the field, check the samples for consistency with a hand penetrometer, carefully wrap them to preserve their condition, and return them to the laboratory for testing. A log of each boring will be prepared to document field activities and results. G&AI will stake the boring locations using normal taping procedures. Locations will be shown on the plan of borings. Precise surveying of boring locations and elevations is not included in the cost estimate. A separate proposal will be submitted. At the completion of drilling operations, bore holes will be backfilled and plugged with soil cuttings. The proposed Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing includes: No. of FWD Tests Spacing per Test (feet) Location 40 25 IH-30 Frontage Roads (two locations). 40 25 Chapel Creek Blvd (two locations). (*) Note: Each location includes approximately 500 LF of paving. Paving section will be based on cored section at time of field investigation, unless otherwise provided by the City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 14 of 30 client. Testing will be performed in one lane per test section. Eighty test locations will be performed in one work day. Testing will be performed concurrent with the geotechnical soil sampling such that traffic control will be utilized for each section of roadway. Data obtained from FWD testing will be provided to the ENGINEER for design purposes. The engineering report will be prepared by a registered engineer and will present the results of the field and laboratory data together with our analyses of the results and recommendations. The ENGINEER will provide a digitally signed and sealed report in electronic PDF format. The report will address: • soil and groundwater conditions encountered at the boring locations; • foundation design recommendations including foundation type, identification of bearing • strata, allowable bearing pressure, and estimated settlement; retaining wall recommendations and stability analysis; • earthwork recommendations, including material and compaction requirements; and • construction considerations related to soil and groundwater conditions at the borings. The ENGINEER shall prepare a detailed geotechnical engineering study and pavement design in conformance with test procedures and guidelines identified in TxDOT's online manual system to include: Pavement Design Manual, Geotechnical Manual, and Bridge Design Manual - LRFD. The study shall include recommendations regarding utility trenching and identify existing groundwater elevation at each boring. 4.3. Subsurface Utility Engineering • Provide Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) per Task 10. 4.4. The Conceptual Design Package shall include the following: • Preliminary cover and index of sheets including project limits, area location map and beginning and end station limits. • SUE Plan sheets sealed by a licensed professional engineer registered in the State of Texas. • Traffic Control Plan: Develop a traffic control plan utilizing TxDOT standard drawings. Develop supplemental traffic control drawings as needed for review and approval by the Traffic Division of the Transportation and Public Works Department. Provide a written summary of the distinct phases to take place during construction operations to include road and/or lane closures, limited access to adjacent properties, and limited access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. • Proposed phasing of any water, sanitary sewer, and/or drainage work that is included in this project documented in both the project schedule and narrative form. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 15 of 30 • Existing typical sections of the roadway to be constructed along with proposed typical sections which outline the proposed improvements. Typical sections shall include existing and proposed ROW, existing and proposed lane widths and direction arrows, existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, and retaining walls. • Conceptual plan and profile sheets showing existing and proposed horizontal roadway alignments, existing and proposed ROW, existing and proposed sidewalks and driveways, proposed lane dimensions and lane arrows, existing drainage structures, city owned and franchise utilities, and existing roadway vertical alignments (profiles). • Preliminary Bridge Layout designed according to TxDOT Bridge Design Manual - LFRD • Preliminary Retaining Wall Layouts) designed according to TxDOT Geotechnical Manual, Chapter 6. • Documentation of key design decisions. • Estimates of probable construction cost. ASSUMPTIONS • All construction plans will be developed on 11" x 17" sheets in accordance with TxDOT practices. • Preliminary Bridge Layout submittal will be made to TxDOT for approval prior to beginning detailed design of bridge. Layout submittal will follow TxDOT requirements. • 10 sets of 11" x 17" size plans will be delivered for the 30% design. • Two pavement designs with separate reports may be required to satisfy City of Fort Worth and TxDOT (on IH 30 ROW) requirements. • TxDOT standard Traffic Control drawings will be utilized. • ENGINEER shall not proceed with Preliminary Design activities without written approval by the CITY of the Conceptual Design Package. DELIVERABLES A. Conceptual Design Package B. Geotechnical Report C. Pavement Design & Report (TxDOT) D. Bridge Layout E. Retaining Wall Layouts) TASK 5. PRELIMINARY DESIGN (60 PERCENT). City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 16 of 30 Preliminary plans and specifications shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project Schedule. ENGINEER will develop the preliminary design of the infrastructure as follows: 5.1. Development of Preliminary Design Drawings and Specifications shall include the following: • Traffic Control Plan updated to reflect any changes as a result of the conceptual design submittal while also including all construction signage and pavement markings which will be in accordance with the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. • A Project Control Sheet, showing all Control Points, used or set while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400. The following information shall be indicated for each Control Point: Identified (existing City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8" Iron Rod); X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system, and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum only; descriptive location (i.e. set in the centerline of the inlet in the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and North Main Street). • SUE plan drawings. • Updated existing and proposed typical section sheets. • Updated roadway plan and profile sheets displaying station and coordinate data for all horizontal alignment P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s; station and elevation data of all vertical profile P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.l.'s, low points, and high points; lengths of vertical curves, grades, K values, e, and vertical clearances where required. • Updated Bridge Layout addressing City and TxDOT review comments. • Preliminary bridge plans. • Preliminary retaining wall plans • No less than two bench marks plan/profile sheet. • Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines. • Station equations relating utilities to paving, when appropriate. • Overall project easement layout sheet(s). • Intersection layout sheets including ROW lines, horizontal alignments, utilities, curbs, sidewalks, driveways, lane dimensions and arrows, and existing and proposed contours (0.25' intervals) • Preliminary roadway details to include curbs, curb expansion joints, driveways, sidewalks, and pavement details. • Signalization Prepare signalization plans for the following intersection: Chapel Creek Boulevard and IH-30 Frontage Roads City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04,09,2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 17 of 30 The project parameters are defined below: 1. The plans, standards and any special specifications will be prepared using English units. 2. Existing traffic signal specifications and standards will be furnished by the City and will be used for design plans, unless otherwise requested by the City in writing. These include: a. " City of Fort Worth Transportation and Public Works Traffic Signal Design Guidelines, October 2007". b. Example plan set illustrating desired format for each type of plan sheet to be developed by the Engineer. c. Example City standard traffic signal construction details, specifications, and Contract Documents. 3. The City will provide 24-hour approach counts, turning movement counts, capacity analyses, and traffic accident data for up to three years, if available. 4. The City will provide determination for provision of cable TV drops, vehicle detection, and Opticom equipment. 5. All intersections will be designed to accommodate existing or future pedestrian activities, including sidewalk ramps, crosswalks, push buttons, and pedestrian heads to meet ADA requirements as requested by the City. 6. The Engineer will prepare the following items to be included in the overall set of construction plans for bidding purposes: a. Existing Conditions Layout - showing utility lines, illumination, signs, markings, and any removals (if necessary). b. Traffic Signal Design Layout (per intersection) - showing existing utilities (utility poles, street lights, storm drains, fire hydrants, etc.), permanent traffic signal poles and mast arms, pedestrian signal poles, pedestrian signals, push buttons, controller cabinet assemblies, signal heads, street lights, detector loops or other detectors, conduit, ground boxes, power sources with distribution to signal service, communications connections, wiring diagrams, pavement markings, signal phasing plan, Opticom equipment, conduit and cable chart, pole summary chart, phasing sequence, pole details, pole locations diagram, and all other items required for the complete construction of the signals.. c. Interconnect and Service Layout - showing existing and proposed interconnect (if applicable) and service. d. Traffic Signal Standard Detail Sheets (for entire project) e. Standard Detail Sheets The work to be performed is further defined below: 1. The Engineer will meet with the City in the field to discuss the electric service, communications, vehicle detection, and Opticom requirements at each intersection. All existing and proposed utilities, pavement widths, lane configurations, and traffic control City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 18 of 30 devices will be determined based on field observations and the record drawings provided by the City. 2. The Engineer will perform a capacity analysis indicating level of service for each movement at each intersection. A capacity analysis report using the SynchroTm analysis software is preferred; however other capacity methods are acceptable. 3. The Engineer will recommend the appropriate traffic signal phasing for each intersection with consideration to the capabilities of current City controller hardware and software operation functions. 4. The "short report" for each intersection typically prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval. The City has waived the report. Work items not included in this Scope of Services: 1. Confirm power source and prepare adjustment required for electric service. 2. Analysis (Synchro, PASSER, TRANSYT-7F, etc) for determination of splits or cycle lengths. 3. Field adjustments to Traffic Signal Timing Plans. 4. Intersection manual turning movement counts or 24-hour intersection tube counts. 5. Record drawings of as -built conditions, and 6. Construction phase services during signal installation. • Illumination The ENGINEER shall provide illumination layout plans, electrical circuit plans and details for roadway lighting system. These plans shall include street illumination and safety lighting at all intersections as well as at all other locations that are required to meet City standards for spacing. The Engineer shall tabulate all quantities and provide specifications. Lighting poles, fixtures, and attachment details shall be designed per City's guidelines. The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following; pole heights and types, pole locations, circuitry routing and other pertinent conduit information, junction box type and locations, electrical panel location and subsidiary panel information, etc. Any wiring diagrams and labeling protocols required shall be in conformance with the City's requirements. • ENGINEER will delineate the watershed based on contour data and field verification and document existing street, right-of-way and storm drain capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at maximum 1" = 200' scale from available 2400t contour data with the contours labeled. Data source and year will be provided by the CITY. Calculations regarding street and right-of- way capacities and design discharges (5-year and 100-year frequencies) at selected critical locations will be provided. Capacities of existing storm drain will be calculated and shown. All calculations shall conform to CITY criteria delineated in the CITY's Storm Water Management Design Manual. All locations in the project area where 100-year runoff exceeds available storm drain and right-of-way capacities shall be clearly identified. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed reasonable and consistent with CITY standards. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 19 of 30 • Storm drain layout sheets showing location and size of all inlets, manholes, junction boxes, culverts and piping to include storm drain profiles showing existing and proposed flow lines, flows, lengths and slopes of pipe, top of ground profile over pipe and connections to existing or proposed storm sewer systems. • Hydraulic calculations and preliminary design of culvert replacement at the north frontage road. • Preliminary signing, pavement marking, illumination and signal layouts. • Guide signing modifications. 5.2. Constructability Review • Prior to the 60 percent review meeting with the CITY, the ENGINEER shall schedule and attend a project site visit with the CITY Project Manager and Construction personnel to walk the project. The ENGINEER shall summarize the CITY's comments from the field visit and submit this information to the CITY in writing. 5.3. Utility Clearance • The ENGINEER will consult with the CITY's Transportation and Public Works Department, Water Department, and other CITY departments, public utilities, private utilities, private utilities and government agencies to determine the approximate location of above and underground utilities, and other facilities (current and future) that have an impact or influence on the project. ENGINEER will design the bridge widening and roadway work to avoid or minimize conflicts with existing utilities, and where known and possible consider potential future utilities in designs. • The ENGINEER shall deliver approved preliminary construction plans to the CITY's Utility Coordinator for forwarding to all utility companies which have facilities within the limits of the project. ASSUMPTIONS • All storm water calculations and design shall conform to the City of Fort Worth Storm Water Management Design Manual, March 2006. • 10 sets of 11" x 17" size plans will be delivered for the 60% design. • The project will be a State -let project. Therefore, no City specifications will be delivered for the 60% design. • TxDOT specifications and standards will be used. • 10 sets of 11" x 17" drawings will be delivered for Utility Clearance. • ENGINEER shall not proceed with Final Design activities without written approval by the CITY of the Preliminary Design plans. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 20 of 30 • The second public meeting will be an informational meeting to advise interested citizens on project schedule and proposed design details such as public art. Major design revisions as a result from public meeting comments and affects environmental clearance will be considered additional work. • The public meeting will not require a detailed summary for environmental documentation. DELIVERABLES A. Preliminary Design drawings B. Utility Clearance drawings C. Estimates of probable construction cost D. Public Meeting exhibits TASK 6. FINAL DESIGN (90 PERCENT) AND FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (100 PERCENT). Upon approval of the Preliminary plans, ENGINEER will prepare construction plans as follows • Final draft construction plans (90%) and specifications shall be submitted to CITY and TxDOT per the approved Project Schedule. • The ENGINEER will prepare a working day analysis in TxDOT format. • The ENGINEER will complete TxDOT Form 1002 and other items necessary for letting. • Following a 90% construction plan review meeting with the CITY, the ENGINEER shall submit Final Plans (100%) to the CITY and TxDOT per the approved Project Schedule. Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed by the ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. • The ENGINEER shall submit a final design estimate of probable construction cost with both the 90% and 100% design packages. This estimate shall use ONLY standard TxDOT bid items. ASSUMPTIONS • The project will be let by TxDOT. • 5 sets of 11" x 17" size drawings and a TxDOT specification list will be delivered for the 90% Design package. • 5 sets of 11" x 17" size drawings and a TxDOT specification list will be delivered for the 100% Design package. DELIVERABLES A. 90% construction plans and TxDOT specification list. B. 100% construction plans and TxDOT specification list. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 21 of 30 C. Detailed estimates of probable construction costs including summaries of bid items and quantities using the TxDOT's standard bid items and format. D. Original cover mylar for the signatures of authorized CITY and TxDOT officials. E. One set of 11 x It mylars will COUubmitted to TxDOT for letting. TASK 7. BID PHASE SERVICES. ENGINEER will support the bid phase of the project as follows. 7.1. Bid Support • The ENGINEER shall communicate and coordinate with TxDOT during the letting process in support of the City. 7.2 Mylar Drawings • The ENGINEER shall submit a set of sealed conformed mylar drawings for record storage. • Record Drawings shall also be submitted as an Adobe Acrobat PDF format (version 6.0 or higher) file and DWF format. There shall be one (1) PDF file and one (1) DWF file for the TPW plan set and a separate PDF and DWF file for the Water plan set. Each PDF and DWF file shall contain all associated sheets of the particular plan set. Singular PDF and DWF files for each sheet of a plan set will not be accepted. PDF and DWF files shall conform to naming conventions as follows: I. TPW file name example — "W-1956_org47.pdf" where "W-1956" is the assigned file number obtained from the CITY, "_org" designating the file is of an original plan set, "47" shall be the total number of sheets in this file. Example: W-0053_org3.pdf and K-0320_org5.pdf II. Water and Sewer file name example - 96X-35667_org36.pdf" where "X- 35667" is the assigned file number obtained from the CITY, "_org" designating the file is of an original plan set, "36" shall be the total number of sheets in this file. Example: X-12755_org18.pdf Both PDF and DWF files shall be submitted on one (1) Compact Disk, which will become property of and remain with the CITY. Floppy disks, zip disks, a -mail flash media will not be accepted. For information on the proper manner to submit files and to obtain a file number for the project, contact the Department of Transportation and Public Works Vault at City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 22 of 30 telephone number (817) 392-8426. He numbers will not be issued to a project uMess the appropriate project numbers and fund codes have been assigned and are in the Department of Transportation and Public Works database. ASSUMPTIONS • The project will be State -let. • The project will be bid only once and awarded to one contractor. • 1 copy full size (22" x 34") mylar plans (conformed, if applicable) with a CD will be delivered to the CITY. DELIVERABLES A. Conformed mylar plans with CD TASK 8. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES. ENGINEER will support the construction phase of the project as follows. 8.1 Construction Support • The ENGINEER shall attend the preconstruction conference. • After the pre -construction conference, the ENGINEER shall provide project exhibits and attend public meeting to help explain the proposed project to residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location and mail the invitation letters to the affected customers. • The ENGINEER shall visit the project site at requested intervals as construction proceeds to observe and report on progress. • The ENGINEER shall review shop drawings, samples and other submittals submitted by the contractor for general conformance with the design concepts and general compliance with the requirements of the contract for construction. Such review shall not relieve the Contractor from its responsibility for performance in accordance with the contract for construction, nor is such review a guarantee that the work covered by the shop drawings, samples and submittals is free of errors, inconsistencies or omissions. The ENGINEER shall log and track all shop drawings, samples and other submittals. • As requested by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall provide necessary interpretations and clarifications of contract documents, review change orders, and make recommendations as to the acceptability of the work. • The ENGINEER shall attend the "Final" project walk through and assist with preparation of final punch list. ASSUMPTIONS • 10 site visits are assumed. • 5 submittal reviews are assumed. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 23 of 30 • 5 RFI's are assumed. • 2 Change Orders are assumed. DELIVERABLES A. Public meeting exhibits B. Response to Contractor's Request for Information C. Review of Change Orders D. Review of shop drawings TASK 9. ROW/EASEMENT SERVICES. ENGINEER will support and perform activities related to ROW and land as outlined below, per scoping direction and guidance from the CITY's Project Manager. 9.1. Right -of -Way Research • The ENGINEER shall determine rights -of -way, easements needs for construction of the project. Required temporary and permanent easements will be identified based on available information and recommendations will be made for approval by the CITY. 9.2: Right -of -Way Map • Prepare aRight-of-Way Map with appropriate right-of-way instruments of conveyance, proposed right-of-way lines, horizontal control sheet Cl"d title page. Locate property corners as needed. All procedures shall conform to TxDOT's Right -of -Way, Book I and II, and in accordance with the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying Practices Act and special procedures as may be required by the North Region of TxDOT. • Prepare GeoPak computation sheets for Survey Closure and Area for each parcel acquired. 9.3 Right-of-Way/Easement Preparation and Submittal. • The ENGINEER shall prepare documents to be used to obtain right-of-way and permanent and/or temporary easements required to construct the improvements. • The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's Buzzsaw site. 9.4. Temporary Right of Entry Preparation and Submittal • Prior to construction, the ENGINEER shall prepare, mail and obtain Temporary Right of Entries from landowners. It is assumed that letters will only be required for land owners adjacent to temporary construction easements or who are directly affected by the project and no easement is required to enter their property. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 24 of 30 • The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's Buzzsaw site. ASSUMPTIONS • 4 right-of-way parcels will be required. • 4 Temporary Right of Entries will be required. • Right -of -Way research includes review of property/right-of-way records based on current internet based Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) information available at the start of the project and available on -ground property information (i.e. iron rods, fences, stakes, etc.). It does not include effort for chain of title research, parent track research, additional research for easements not included in the TAD, right-of-way takings, easement vacations and abandonments, right-of-way vacations, and street closures. DELIVERABLES A. Right -of -Way exhibits and meets and bounds provided on CITY forms for four (4) right-of-way parcels. B. Right -of -Way Map C. Temporary Right of Entry Letters TASK 10. SURVEY AND SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING SERVICES. ENGINEER will provide survey support as follows. 10.1. Design Survey • ENGINEER will perform field surveys to collect horizontal and vertical elevations and other information needed by ENGINEER in design and preparation of plans for the project. Information gathered during the survey shall include topographic data, elevations of all sanitary and adjacent storm sewers, rim/invert elevations, location of buried utilities, structures, trees (measure caliper, identify overall canopy, and have qualified arborist identify species of trees), and other features relevant to the final plan sheets. Existing drainage at intersections will be verified by field surveys. Spot elevations will be shown on intersection layouts with cross slope to fit intersecting grade lines. • The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include the following: — A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points, used or set while gathering data. Generally on a scale of not less than 1:400: — The following information about each Control Point; a. Idented (Existing. CITY Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8" Iron Rod) b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system, and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on CITY Datum only. c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in the South City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 25 of 30 curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and North Main Street). Coordinates on all P.C.'s, P.T.'s, PA.'s, Manholes, Valves, etc., in the same coordinate system, as the Control. No less than two horizontal bench marks, per line or location. — Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines. — Station equations relating utilities to paving, when appropriate. 10.2 Aerial Mapping • TxDOT does not have a current aerial flight and associated mapping for the project area. Therefore, the ENGINEER will perform Aerial Mapping services to establish horizontal planimetrics of sufficient coverage to prepare Traffic Control Plans and other design elements as needed. • Mapping coverage shall include an area of 7,000 feet x 1,400 feet along IH 30; and 3,200 feet x 300 feet along Chapel Creek Boulevard. The flight shall be 1,500 feet above average ground with a planned photo scale of 1"=250' (1:3,000). • Establish fourteen (14) horizontal and vertical aerial control points for the aerial mapping. The aerial control shall be based on ground coordinates using the TxDOT Fort Worth District's scale factor of 1.00012. Subsurface Utility Engineering Provide Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) up to Quality Level 8 (where possible), as described below. The SUE shall be performed in accordance with Cl/ASCE 38- 02. Quality Level A information will be provided for specifically designated utilities that may be in conflict with the proposed improvements. The specific utilities requiring Level A designation will be identified after the Preliminary Design stage. Quality Level D • Conduct appropriate investigations (e.g., owner records, County/CITY records, personal interviews, visual inspections, etc.), to help identify utility owners that may have facilities within the project limits or that may be affected by the project. • Collect applicable records (e.g., utility owner base maps, "as built" or record drawings, permit records, field notes, geographic information system data, oral histories, etc.) on the existence and approximate location of existing involved utilities. • Review records for: evidence or indication of additional available records; duplicate or conflicting information; need for clarification. • Develop SUE plan sheets and transfer information on all involved utilities to appropriate design plan sheets, electronic files, and/or other documents as required. Exercise professional judgment to resolve conflicting information. For information depicted, indicate: utility type and ownership; date of depiction; quality level(s); end points of any utility data; line status (e.g., active, abandoned, out of service); line size and condition; number of jointly buried cables; and encasement. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 26 of 30 Quality Level C (includes tasks as described for Quality Level D) • Identify surface features, from project topographic data and from field observations, that are surface appurtenances of subsurface utilities. • Include survey and correlation of aerial or ground -mounted utility facilities in Quality Level C tasks. • Survey surface features of subsurface utility facilities or systems, if such features have not already been surveyed by a professional surveyor. If previously surveyed, check survey data for accuracy and completeness. • The survey shall also include (in addition to subsurface utility features visible at the ground surface): determination of invert elevations of any manholes and vaults; sketches showing interior dimensions and line connections of such manholes and vaults; any surface markings denoting subsurface utilities, furnished by utility owners for design purposes. • Exercise professional judgment to correlate data from different sources, and to resolve conflicting information. • Update (or prepare) plan sheets, electronic files, and/or other documents to reflect the integration of Quality Level D and Quality Level C information. • Recommend follow-up investigations (e.g., additional surveys, consultation with utility owners, etc.) as may be needed to further resolve discrepancies. • Provide Quality Level C to identify overhead utilities on the project and provide the overhead utility information on the SUE plan sheets. Level B (includes tasks as described for Quality Level C) • Select and apply appropriate surface geophysical methods) to search for and detect subsurface utilities within the project limits, and/or to trace a particular utility line or system. • Based on an interpretation of data, mark the indications of utilities on the ground surface for subsequent survey. Utilize paint or other method acceptable for marking of lines. • Unless otherwise directed, mark centerline of single -conduit lines, and outside edges of multi -conduit systems. • Resolve differences between designated utilities and utility records and surveyed appurtenances. • Recommend additional measures to resolve differences if they still exist. Recommendations may include additional or different surface geophysical methods, exploratory excavation, or upgrade to Quality Level A data. • As an alternative to the physical marking of lines, the ENGINEER may, with CITY's approval, utilize other means of data collection, storage, retrieval, and reduction, that enables the correlation of surface geophysical data to the project's survey control. Level A • Expose and locate utilities at specific locations. • Tie horizontal and vertical location of utility to survey control. • Provide utility size and configuration. • Provide paving thickness and type, where applicable. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 27 of 30 • Provide general soil type and site conditions and such other pertinent information as is reasonably ascertainable from each test hole site. 10.4. Construction Survey • Be available to the CITY on matters concerning the layout of the project during its construction • ENGINEER will set control points (i.e. tie survey to permanent monument such as TPW monuments and/or property corners, one location each at beginning and end of project) for the project, these points must be indivisible. Streets over 500 ft in length or streets on curves may require a greater density of control points to maintain intervisibility between each point. ENGINEER shall establish a minimum of two bench marks per plan sheet (bench marks shall be located adjacent to project) and shall provide the following construction staking services: • INCIDENTAL PRE -CONSTRUCTION STAKING: Right-of-way flagging, back of curb location, driveways, walks and retaining walls as requested by the CITY Inspector, curb radii (to determine construction location) for utility clearance. ASSUMPTIONS • Five (5) Quality Level A test holes are included in the fee. • Construction staking will be performed by the City of Fort Worth. DELIVERABLES A. Copies of field survey data and notes signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor. B. Drawing of the project layout with dimensions and coordinate list. C. SUE plan drawings sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas. D. Color digital orthophotography with 3" pixel resolution. E. Topographic mapping (1"=50') with 1' contour interval in Microstation. F. 2D planimetric file covering project area designated above. G. 3D DTM file covering area approximately 2,200 feet x 400 feet along IH 30; and 1,950 feet x 200 feet along Chapel Creek Boulevard. H. Photo mosaic of designated project area. TASK 11. PERMITTING. ENGINEER will provide permng support for the CITY to obtain any and all agreements and/or permits normally required for a project of this size and type, as follows. 11.1. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 28 of 30 For projects that disturb an area greater than one (1) acre, ENGINEER will prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) required for the Project for use by the Contractor during construction. ENGINEER will prepare drawings and details for proposed SWPPP improvement that the Contractor must use during construction. Contractor will be responsible for filing the SWPPP with appropriate regulatory agencies. ASSUMPTIONS • Permit preparation will begin after approval of the Conceptual Design. DELIVERABLES A. SWPPP drawings and details City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 29 of 30 ADDITIONAL SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THE EXISTING SCOPE OF SERVICES Additional Services not included in the existing Scope of Services — CITY and ENGINEER agree that the following services are beyond the Scope of Services described in the tasks above. However, ENGINEER can provide these services, if needed, upon the CITY's written request. Any additional amounts paid to the ENGINEER as a result of any material change to the Scope of the Project shall be agreed upon in writing by both parties before the services are performed. These additional services include the following: • Negotiation of easements or property acquisition. • Services related to development of the CITY's project financing and/or budget. • Services related to disputes over pre -qualification, bid protests, bid rejection and re -bidding of the contract for construction. • Construction management and inspection services • Performance of materials testing or specialty testing services. • Services necessary due to the default of the Contractor. • Services related to damages caused by fire, flood, earthquake or other acts of God. • Services related to warranty claims, enforcement and inspection after final completion. • Services to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation undertaken or defended by the CITY. • Performance of miscellaneous and supplemental services related to the project as requested by the CITY. • Preparation of Interstate Access Justification document (IAJ) • Design coordination with Fort Worth Public Arts Council to include meeting attendance and preparation of displays. • Services to provide a Public Hearing. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment A PMO Release Date: 04.09.2012 Revised by TNP for TxDOT Project May 2012 Page 30 of 30 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION Design Services for Widening of Chapel Creek Blvd. Bridge at IH 30 City Project No. 0901 Lump Sum Project 1. Compensation A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated a total lump sum fee of $ 563,730.92 as summarized in Exhibit 13-1 — Engineer Invoice and Section IV — Summary of Total Project Fees. The total lump sum fee shall be considered full compensation for the services described in Attachment A, including all labor materials, supplies, and equipment necessary to deliver the services. B. The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Section II - Method of Payment. I1. Method of Payment A. Partial payment shall be made to the ENGINEER monthly upon City's approval of an invoice prepared and submitted by the ENGINEER in the format and including content as presented in Exhibit 13-1, Progress Reports as required in item 111. of this Attachment B, and Schedule as required in Attachment D to this Agreement. B. The estimated current physical percent complete as required on the invoice shall be calculated from the progress schedule as required in Attachment D to this Standard Agreement and according to the current version of the City of Fort Worth's Schedule Guidance Document. C. The cumulative sum of such monthly partial fee payments shall not exceed the total current project budget including all approved Amendments. D. Each invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this Agreement by an officer of the ENGINEER. III. Progress Reports A. The ENGINEER shall prepare and submit to the designated representative of the Transportation and Public Works Department monthly progress reports and schedules in the format required by the City. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 Page 1 of 3 B-1 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION IV. Summary of Total Project Fees Firm Primary Responsibility Fee Amount Prime Consultant Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc. Schematic, PS&E $4267685600 75.69% Proposed M/WBE Sub=Consultants Lina T Ramey & Assoc Surveying Services $64,457892 11.43% Blanton & Associates Environmental Services $40,183.00 7.13% HVJ & Associates Geotechnical Engineering $31,005000 5.50% Non=M/WBE Consultants GRAM NTX Counts Traffic Counts $1,400.00 0.24% TOTAL $563,730.92 1000/0 Project Number &Name Total Fee M/WBE Fee M/WBE 00901 Chapel Creek Blvd at IH 30 Bridge Widening $563,730292 $135,645292 24.06% City MNVBE Goal = 20% City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 Page 2 of 3 Consultant Committed Goal = 24.06 EXHIBIT "BA" ENGINEER INVOICE (Supplement to Attachment B) Insert required invoice format following this page, including negotiated total budget and allocations of budgets across work types and work phases. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 5.19.2010 Page 3 of 3 IY O 0 1 m I 0 u c d O m a co W Y N N d U f LL 0 a w 0 Xk � � d >2 R �o E E o 'o o 0 > U>amLLF- a cu c ar s c m R E m vm c v � U L p 7 > U = o > — ca � 0 0 > ,o e > _ y in a` a r c ar U p. a E a 0 U 'O � C N � a 0 o Q U C 0 a) E s „a, 0 v o a as s � C E 53 'p 0 E aa) E Q rn C o Eo a, o� E E as C 0 �L N H L s R U m v u u v a 0 N Q E 0 U m ti7 +R+ C N L a N m o � m O O LL.. L W LM O J W W J O O O O O O O O O ® O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0® O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ao L O LO CO O N N Ln N U) N N LO It (o (6 O N O LO N d � O 1� LO r d O Nt d p N g Ln T- cv M cv ce d• M m r- r- r' (O � �' J 60. Ef) 6 - 64 69 69 69 Iq CO. 64 EA 69 64 6•} 69 O w N O co 00 r� O N N O N co c7 It 00 N N r- N O 0) r- r- LC) N (0 O 'N n O C a) •� O O •V C7 C) CD CD C) C) C) C) CD C)® C:) CD C)00 �. O O CG 0 (C 69 C a) O O) a) O •� .� CD CD C) CD C) C) C)O ® O O O O N C)C) 0 C � W 64 L U a) O O C O C:) C)C) O C) C) 00 C)O 00 00 d• N � 00 p 0) M r O C W 6- (D O O a) O U •� o O C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D C) O O O O L N C U) W r- 63 L O a) O C -6 • E O O M O O O O O O r O d' (D O (O m W 6- L V O O a) 0) .O C O C) M N C) 00 00 O 00) CD1� a) N Nt �- CD C) 00 _ LO U t U) H x N lz a) 0 U O C a) O O)0 0a) U N U � .O 5 a)o0 6) Lo C C .Q- Y O U (0 U) C C O In N o N U U) a) (0 Q N Q C C � >% >' V 0.' C E a) Y C U) a)LLJ a) a) E U O C) 0• 2 O 2 0) CO CO O m Q O O N C 2 a N a) C) O C C O O Q U w y E� C E m >, '� N f N U WE O O U a) fn fn Q C O O 0 0 N m O a) C 0 "O t V Q N Q U a) O > 6 a) N •� •U .O p C N 023 m N c06 c 0 U W CL a) c v O Q � rn U U N C a) w N CL EC c c E O 0) E rn tm m c E ate) 'N C C � O L L L O O 'N C •� L LO > L L () (0 O a U /O\ U W a U U CD W d �a/) LL O d v7 a) m r N Y U) O N Y C) N M Z F-M(0 O mN N N J N�N 0 Z LL w w LL U Q J h W Q w J G o O o 0 0 0 0 O CD O® 0 0 0 O O C> O O O O O o O CD 0 0 0® O O O O O O O CD O N O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O M M N 00 O d' O d' M NT of (O (O 00 00 O O 0) O r� d' 00 O O Lo r- (D N a) N N O N � r� 0) N 00 � O Yi T- M M L6 r� (D 69 6`3 O r� O Et) O 69 60- c- 69 64 c- 64 00 64 64 w 64 63 Er) 64 69 69 64 69 O Co r CA N O N (D r Nt 00 to O O O O 00 O O O O N 10 O O (D O m CD 00 (D (D 00 O CD CD O O CD CD N (D O CD O CD CD00 00 CO CD m d- 00 00 N O N d' O O 9qT 00 N N O � mt N N M M h O O O O O O O O 00 N CD CD CD CD CD O CD O O O O O O O O N O CD O O CD CD CD TOM N � N d N N 00 N d co O O N co CO M a c� U) E M c O J U E (0 0) (0 O U O N L C: E Q 0' C C cYo F� U ai C O C_ +U)- = o g 06 > C ai C L U U E O ca a) O 4r N cO c a) c m c E 00 c 2 0 � U) E U C - Q a) w a) — > _ O M = o- U) 0 .� U) 0 a) 0 m cc o C a� c 0a) U L j 0 a) p � � O = (D � E tf c c ��— c a) u 0 Q U c a) � cn .� . O C ca co � E O °' c U > O rn U m E a 0_ Q aD 0_ a�'i a�'i 0 0 L C E > _ U a� 0 rn ca F� o O a) O7 : .cu u 0 _Y (n LL �Oq V J = . + C > to L ,� O _ O J U 0 cc Q (0 C O= c ca rn cn 'C O U Q O U U E .L a) y = O 0 O s O 2 O = g +�_ N O N EO a s p olf 0 (0 Q `O C O Q) ca N 2 H 0 M 0 a 00� 0 0 0 = (a U:3 :3 t = o U 0 w 0 (n am a a= Q w U M M `1 CD N M Cn .� N 0 m M M M M M M 0 N�N 0 LL Z LL. W w LL U Q J I— W Q W J i O o 0 0 0 0 o CD o O o® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 o C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M LO O 00 4 O O O O O 44 � N O CD CD O CD CD CD CD O r- O CD 69 00 N � N N 00 d' M N M M N M CD O O 'd' CD It It O 00 Cl 00 M d' LO O d' NTr� N 'd' (3 9q O L M M L r 6> L co Ni O (.069 M 6 k 6 - 60 69 �- (fl lfl ER ti � 6 - 69 64 64 N 63 63 69 6) 6� 63 r- co f� co M M N N Re LO M r O 00 CD O N CD CD CD O M O O (C O O O O CD O CD GD O d' ID ID O O N co ® O O ON O O O O � O co N N � N M N N 00 N 00 N 1-0qq CD co 00 CD � O L C O U U CDO O O 00 M O O M O CD O O M N 00 O CD O O @ 4tim O N 00 N O N d' O O Nt 00 � N O N CD O O it N N O N r N O O 44t O N d' C 12) U) a� c o m U C o U c O g U a @ U O. O X U C LL o V! 4= 4r a U N -o O @ U C C C N N o U � @ U CD U N p� 7 C N d U U) c @ U o o a. a C F a� a� a) a U o o(@ C U) o Cn (a O L N > O C 0 N J 7 C O _ o) Q U)@ @ C a7 (n fn J d to N ,N OL U O J s0 � C N '(n @ 0 m a y '(� LO U @ � m @ C 0 L d O ® C .Q C U a) U O a 6 C a) O o ' @U @U >+ N U N CC @ w O 7 Q L U CM @ C @ Q. C \ U O O C m @ N @ @ @ '� (D 0 U 'o w > w > o @ m E a .o a O o@ Q@ O L L X L U Q- L �- Q- L O U F- w a w o L a>>> a @ a) o o c� U) U cU a a LO �- (V co Nt Y d I® H C M N�N W LL [— 0 Z LL LL wC w G LL O U Q J H W aw J O CD (D (D O O CD CD CDO O CD CD CD CD O (D® (D O O O CD CD CD O O O O O O CD CD CD CD CD CDO O 00 00 00 N O O O O O 00 O O O O O 00 O N O O O r 00 f� r O M O It(0 00 d' (D (0 N 00 00 00 � U) LO d d' 0) a) V � d 00 N 00 O O O d' qt 00 I� V' L() r MITr N r M M N N 00 r LO d' r �} 64 09 EA H} 60 NN (f} Y)r CV) 69 vr' Ef} Vf Ef3 60 01) H> P M 99t co Nt O N VW J1 CO �t N N N 0 r m M r d' r co N M O O (0 O N O O O N O O O O O O O O O 00 co N N O O O N 00 O O O O N O O O O dam' co N r N v 00 Oco M � ao d• N (0 w Ile N N r 0 0 v o o O O O ono O O O O o 0 0 ® O O o TMMO O O O O O O d' O O 00 d' Nt d' 00 N o 00 O 60 P 00 N r d C0 d � 00 00 d 00 N M M r 0 0 c ® o a) TMMM E a) U (6 N N d Q U) E E a) N O) 7 i O _ U O z (� tf _ O O O L (� (6 ; GC p L a+ O Q L ++ a) U c U O x O �► U N O C = U L E U C CD U U Z m c"Jo m N O 0 > U C c c� i0 '� is m LF.co O 70 d T U L Op a Lopmom L O C LL O7 C d (p C� N o r O O U U40 C O Q N C Q C Co N `� @ wo d7 >, L. O� U fC N N m c d C is > M c M c .-, o N u m o co �° o o I— Cl0)U 0 >, o d)) c) O •c c is �_ V) Q ui c c dS _ N (L6 U (� p) L �+ •Sl O1 .0 N O �. U �) N d 0 U N N O ca (0 U •C U U U N C Q p ++ U Q L c E a) U w m a w a 73 0 a y (n 2 U U C C C C C 'C O> o U d 9 mommC ii ii. ii CD m 0_ U ii iZ ii m m m MOMMIN (o MOMMIN n MOMMEM N co 4MMA� .Y r N CO CO d LO (O co Y r N M M O M M O W Z W U Q H H Q N�N I.L O L LL w LL J W w J i 0 0 0 0 o O O o ® o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0® rn o 0 0 0 6 0 00 6 0 00 N Cl LO O O co CD CD CD CD CD CO M O ~ M lV) O N 1� 00 LO 1` O V) 1` CDM Vcq 611 N N N ��� 6N? � Y EA Ea} N Y> E» E» r O (0 O O O O O O P O O O O O N CD CD N O 00 O LO (O N MCI CD � O o 0 0 o co 0 0 co N � O LO LO d' 00 N CD N 00 OD U'7 O N it N CO) n. c� L U O Q O C O 0 � C: C = X O C ~ N W W +- (D &MMMMM� U U L L Q Q � Y > `° v U v p c c rn a) a) N to O ^ U V O 0)a) 4) O E .O (D 7 7 U U O O LU d > LdC O O O N LLI JIL p Wpi C L _ a O 0. o a 0, c U3 N U c fO V% O a) a O L O L N 0. o N M a) W (D g 'Q W a -r3 L > U) (A a> W U to (U� v a' 3 0 w a w w w cn m r c °3 E rn c a— `o >, C 2 m c >, U LL U O O O O O o Q U) LL o 0 W U M LO N U Of I— co 0 Q00 J fq 0 0 Y Y N co � O O O O O O O O R CD CD FEE H C J T a z F- O ® Al CD O N M N 6 w EA N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 LL O Y� ry� LL O O L a O � J y O N IL in a T r LOC r ATTACHMENT "C" CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT Design Services for Widening of Chapel Creek Blvd. Bridge at IH 30 City Project No. 0901 The Standard Agreement is not modified for this contract. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment C PMO Release Date: 05.19.2010 Page 1 of 1 Consulting Contract Schedule Specifications City of Fort Worth Capital Improvement Program Attachment D - Project Schedule FO RT WORT This PROTECT requires a Tier 3 schedule as defined herein and in the Cihj's Schedule Guidance Document. D1. CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT: The CONSULTANT shall prepare schedules for consulting services that meet the requirements described in this specification, showing by Critical Path Method (CPM) the planned sequence and timing of the Work associated with the Agreement. All submittals shall be submitted in PDF format, and schedule files shall also be submitted in native file format (i.e. file formats associated with the scheduling software). The approved scheduling software systems for creating the schedule files are: - Primavera (Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY) Primavera Contractor (Version 6.1 or later or approved by CITY) - Microsoft Project (Version 2003/2007 or later or approved by CITY)(PHASING OUT) D2. BASELINE CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: Following notice -to -proceed, the CONSULTANT shall develop, submit and review the draft detailed baseline consulting services schedule with the CITY to demonstrate the CONSULTANT's understanding of the Agreement requirements and approach for performing the work. The CONSULTANT will prepare the final detailed baseline consulting services schedule based on CITY comments, if any, and submit to the CITY no later than the submittal of the first project invoice. The following guidelines shall be adhered to in preparing the baseline schedule, and as described in further detail in the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document. a. The scope shall be subdivided by work breakdown structure (WBS) representing the tasks, subtasks, and activities associated with delivering the work. b. The schedule shall accurately describe the major work activities, key milestones, and dependencies/relationships as appropriate to the work. c. The schedule should include appropriate meetings, review periods, critical decision points, including third party utility dependencies and reviewing agencies. D3. PROGRESS CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: The CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit monthly to the CITY for approval the updated schedule in accordance with D1 and D2 and the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document inclusive. As the Work progresses, the CONSULTANT shall enter into the schedule and record actual progress as described in the CITY's Schedule Guidance Document. The updated schedule submittal shall also include a concise schedule narrative that highlights the following, if appropriate and applicable: • Changes in the critical path, • Expected schedule changes, • Potential delays, • Opportunities to expedite the schedule, • Coordination issues the CITY should be aware of or can assist with, City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment D PMO Release Date: 02.15.2011 Page 1 of 2 • Other schedule -related issues that the CONSULTANT wishes to communicate to the CITY. D4. PERFORMANCE AND CONSULTING SERVICES SCHEDULE: If the work accomplished falls behind that scheduled due to factors within the CONSULTANT's control, the CONSULTANT shall take such action as necessary to improve the progress of the Work. In addition, the CITY may require the CONSULTANT to submit a revised schedule demonstrating the proposed plan to make up the delay in schedule progress and to ensure completion of the Work within the allotted Agreement time. D5. SCHEDULE TIERS SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: The requirements for the schedule are determined based on the nature and needs of the project. The schedule tier for this project is stated at the top of this document. CONSULTANT shall submit each schedule relying on the CITY's current Schedule Guidance Document. D6. SCHEDULE SUBMITTAL AND PAYMENT: As stated in III.A.(1). of the Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide the information required by Attachment D. CONSULTANT's monthly invoices will not be accepted and processed for payment without monthly schedule updates that are submitted in the time and manner required by Attachment D and the CITY's current Schedule Guidance Document. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment D PMO Release Date: 02.15.2011 Page 2 of 2 T m E O c I (n C N h u! LL, (D O C N O LL C r N N m N ^ 00 (0 (0 'E N 00 N N U O 4 00 r-i N (n Ql r-1 l� m o o N r� ri O_ rl .-i r-1 N N e-1 ri N ri Iii 1! IO%iI.I �1 1r1 i Iri aI ei r"! roll ce'rl ai r"i-ai '-1 'i -i --ei NONNI -e-l e-rl i ci r-a- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m to o0 w O Ln t0 Ln a d' V O ri [t \ O 00 O N Ln (n O M O M rl Ln Q) m u1 tV N rl \ N N N N rl rl N N N i-i N M ri N N rl N (14 \ M \ N ri ri \ rl M r\i r�i l\A M O M M V N M l\A n M m c I m mr N M ri M W 0000 v W 0) M e-1 a rill a 0/ 'O rl ri er c 7 a OJ C O e C a 07 m 'c w e 7 7 0/ O O N N 0) N 0/ m N 'c N Y. O t 0) 7 O t O O 01 LL 7 01 LL 7 O I--' L 7 O F- 7 3 F'- 3 ~ 3 11 F'- F- 3 F- F F- 3 F- g F- F- F- r Q e FIJI LL 0� a t i :-i e-i ri N rl rl IF rl ri rl ri ri ri N ri ri r i ci ri ri ri ri ri N N r,l ci ri N 0 N (p M roll N 1\A M a M a d\' r\i 0000 W (n r\-1 Ln M O M N N N W O M Y N E N N N \ N N N r-1 N ei \ e-i \ ri \ rl r-I c-i fV N ri M N \ t-1 rl ri c-1 N ri N 00 n '� \ \ M \ \ \ \ \ \ M \ M \ n \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ z3 O p p c rl O O Cit O ri c M c y M m M m en M lA Im ri M M V 00 00 -- N ) F- U c'Ci N a No 7 a NOa0/ 7 W O 7 O O F- O O O IC O 7 L O a > 0! O O 7 v N 7 3 m )v in a = N N NrIN O G o E00 0 0 o\'\' o\°\° o\'\' o o\°\° o\'\' o\°\° o\°\° o\°\° o\°\° o\'\' o\'\' o oOR o o\'\' o\°\° o\'\' o\'\' o o 0 ai o U ri O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O fl rn CU K IIIII = N H 0 0 0V) V) (A VI (t. ('6. N V1 V1 V) V) V) (A to U ? >% A m > V1 T a >lk (A Vt >T A w Vt ut T >% T vi T ? ;0 C m m m ? ? rite u! T m m m 0 . >T m v) v) vA m ) m >io > m m m A• >� m s >. a m a m a >, m a -a -a >. m >. m m >% >% >. a m m m No No No >. m a s a m � m rl o 00 a rl m a N o am a m a Ln m m m N a a a 0) N of m a CD U m Y 3 a M NW M a M W N W a N a 00 M a 'o a N N N N Rt M ri a O N 00 o a)U ri l0 Ln rl 00 l0 M N M M M N LM ri rl M O N N N In 00 Ln rl N e-1 Toil 0) ci N E Y w U E Q Q H 7 t E N N N N N E U oo in a w It w w W N a a a c ea 3 c O It 7 Q C L LL (n Na) �j K U Gf {pp O y U U y N n C L m v O Vl �= W Q a +' m -mp E vm- U U F0 rn rn m C O) V) LL E Ogloom Vf loom0�0 01 0) 0q N aU.., Q C. Ln 00) C �O a 1A C c !Z J 0) owC o C loom ,? 41 h0 01 LL a V) 0) O1 00 W m rn 7 C ~ 01 N d N � c � ++ C c0 No ++ c C V 0cROWNA Vf cu C = C Z 0 V M N 01 +,, Z �� 0D CL 0) "8 = 0) � f0 y N 'V W O_ C ti W y .� UO _O O C 0) O 00 0 sommom C >iiiff0) 0) to .� a W W W 0� a:r > U H EL LOT) � a3i r c E c p u a u 4 o m a a a o c T oc o u a IRWIN c t V o u Q 3 m uw u n u �' CL p o Ln o 2� O O O y Z E 06 'o � a�� C 0 0' c o� a¢ a H Y� O a M �o rn ri � ac oe oc D O 0 z a` a` M O OD N (O O N M 'V' CD 700 N O O to CO O CD UN M O (O 00 00 00 a) 0)N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ln IQ 46 o , r v! 75 u � v r v� E O T Q 0 O t .S C C N N 0 N N C O O` in ii o a =a d ILL c- C W "l O 0 0 3 O C 0 W E E E OJ �Z U — rn Y N N E m o � m m m m m Q c c c p dr m O 7 Q a` we a+ n O E 010 U OO1 r CLO _ - D_ U m N Y Z C ) Q - - U 01 N O w 0 a! E r w Y U E U U a. n H a• m `m E E — d d v E LL NI — = — o :3o Z t a 0 _ d U) d n U) C rn m; o N 2 Q IIQ OS d U U ❑, 1— In fQ E cA � ui — 00 ut N ri C O N— LL % N O N N � O Q — N I w � _ 0 w m _ U N um— Attachment E Widening of the Chapel Creek Blvd. Bridge Over IH 30 City Project No. 0901 r (, 1tF,tti� r ri l�. - />� Jj•�' fill ,r rr 'r L� rYl r ;{"A,!ri~,gory OL r 57 tJ�� IFF {.. f14 Tr' r ,. IFFIFFF }� r r :r;.'s" rd i err ;I IF f%rFt= ' Rut t'f '1 ,r ti•tr'ir OF S✓ i IF IF IF �.; I• i i I4 j c ` - / IF if F�. r.�+�r r t,t ,i 1 FF i .1 r- FIN �t09* 0 FIX Of r i� IF LL r. IF L F. FIFIrIII CHAPEL CREEK BLVD. V.IF BRIDGE WIDENING — — 1: J Project Location Chapel Creel< Blvd. & IH 30 City Project No. 0901 Mapsco 72K m ® rn O x TBM Rpf MOn Na F2M FORT WORTH Page 1 of 2 Official site of the City of Fort Worth, Texas i COUNCIL ACTION: Approved on 10/23/2012 REFERENCE 20CHAPELCREEK ** DATE. 10/23/2012 NO.: C-25937 LOG NAME: BRIDGE SERVICES AGREE CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC NO HEARING: SUBJECT: Authorize Execution of an Engineering Services Agreement with Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc., in the Amount of $563,730.92 for the Design of Chapel Creek Bridge Over Interstate Highway 30 (COUNCIL DISTRICT 3) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of an Engineering Services Agreement with Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc., in the amount of $563,730.92 for the design of Chapel Creek Bridge over Interstate Highway 30. DISCUSSION: This Agreement for Professional Engineering Services with Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc., will provide for the design of a new four -lane bridge structure over Interstate Highway 30. The project will result in additional capacity, thereby reducing congestion and traffic delays. The project will also increase safety by providing protected left turn lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, upgraded traffic signals and street lights. The City's 2008 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes partial funding for this project. On May 8, 2012, (M&C C-25607) the City Council authorized the execution of a Local Transportation .Project Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) in the amount of $1,650,059.00 to widen the Chapel Creek Bridge over Interstate Highway 30. Funding for this Agreement includes the amount of $309,016.00 in City funds (or 19 percent of the total). The balance is being provided by Federal and State Funds. Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc., will perform the required design work for a lump sum fee in the amount of $563,730.92. Staff considers this cost to be fair and reasonable for the scope of services to be performed. Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc., is in compliance with the City's DBE Program by committing to 24 percent DBE participation on this project. The City's DBE goal on this project is 20 percent. This project is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 3, Mapsco 72K. FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Financial Management Services Director certifies that funds are available in the current capital budget, as appropriated, of the Grant Capital Projects Fund. TO Fund/Account/Centers Submitted for City Manager's Office b� FROM Fund/Account/Centers GR74 531200 203210090130 $563,730.92 Fernando Costa (6122) FORT �'4''ORT!} mhtml:file://C:\Documents and Settings\weissm\My Documents\Chapel Creek Bridge\Contract\C-25937.mht 10/30/2012 T'laQ'i. 1:eVlew �riginatina Department Head: Douglas W. Wiersig (7801) Page 2 of Additional Information Contact: ATTACHMENTS 20CHAPEL CREEK BRIDGE MAP1.pdf Mike Weiss (8485) mhtml:file://C:\Documents and Settings\weissm\My Documents\Chapel Creek Bridge\Contract\C-25937.mht 10/3 0/2012 •1:��\►�1 �IK�1�1► [«l I �K�l►�III�II�I►�1 [N'r � [�l►�■1��/�\: 30