Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract 49555-A2CSC No. 49555-A2 AMENDMENT No . 2 TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT No. 49555 WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth (CITY) and HDR Engineering, Inc., (ENGINEER) made and entered into City Secretary Contract No. 49555, (the CONTRACT) which was authorized by M&C C-28288 on the 20th day of June, 2017 in the amount of $ 400,000.00; and WHEREAS, the CONTRACT was subsequently revised by: Amendment Number 1 in the amount of $ 843,000.00 which was authorized by M&C # C-28764 on June 26, 2018, and WHEREAS, the CONTRACT involves engineering services for the following project: 101014 - Avondale-Haslet Road; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary to execute Amendment No. 2 to the CONTRACT to include an increased scope of work and revised fee. NOW THEREFORE, CITY and ENGINEER, acting herein by and through their duly authorized representatives, enter into the following agreement, which amends the CONTRACT: l. Article I of the CONTRACT is amended to include the engineering services specified in a proposal dated February copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. City for the additional design services to be performed totals $ 1,746,516.00. (See Attached Funding Breakdown Sheet, 2. additional 10, 2021, a The cost to by Engineer Page -3-) Article II of the CONTRACT is amended to provide for an increase in the fee to be paid to Engineer for all work and services performed under the Contract, as amended, so that the total fee paid by the City for all work and services shall be an amount of $ 2,989,516.00. 3. All other provisions of the Contract, which amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect. City of Fort Worth Professional Services Agreement Amendment Template CFW Official Release 9/19/2017 Page 1 of 3 are not expressly OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. VIIORTH, TK EXECUTED and EFFECTIVE as of the date last written by a signatory, below. APPROVED: City of Fort Worth b� 8�u^gGcr7� DanaBurghdoff( r5,202 1:40CDT) Dana Burghdoff, AICP Assistant City Manager DATE : Apl" 5, 2021 ENGINEER HDR Engineering, Inc. Ramon F. M gue , P.E. Vice President DATE : 3/30/21 APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: 1,.)�C7_L._ Will'iamJohnso (Apr1,�07117:00CDT) William M. Johnson Director, Transportation and Public Works Department Contract Compliance Manager: By signing, I acknowledge that I am the person responsible for the monitoring and administration of this contract, including ensuring all performance and reporting requirements. ���e�r� GUG�%te, �G�� �� DerekA. Whlte, PhD, PE (Mar31, 202109:42CDT) Derek A. White, PhD, PE Senior Project Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: I�ax�l DBlack (Apr2, 202llL58 CDT) Douglas W. Black Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: �������� Mary J. Kayser City Secretary City of Fort Worth Professional Services Agreement Amendment Template CFW Official Release 9/19/2017 Page 2 of 3 44b��� q' �� �� ���OR����� o d 0 � ~a °��1�d �vo °=d o � � oo ��� ��� � o ��000000� � TEX AS-o.�'� �����04�' M&C Date: 21-0206 03-23-2021 OFFICIAL RECORD CITY SECRETARY FT. VIIORTH, TK FUNDING BREAKDOWN SHEET City Secretary No. 49555 Amendment No. 2 Department Fund-Account-Center Amount TPW 34018 - 0200431 - 5330500 - 101014 - $1,746,516.00 002330 - 9999 - 18010199 Total: $1,746,516.00 City of Fort Worth Professional Services Agreement Amendment Template CFW Official Release 9/19/2017 Page 3 of 3 3/24/2021 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA M&C Review DATE: 3/23/2021 REFERENCE **M&C 21- LOG NAME: NO.: 0206 CODE: C TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING: 20AVONDALE HASLET ENG AMEND NO 2 NO FC1 RT �4�'U RT H _��_ SUBJECT: (CD 7) Authorize Execution of Amendment No. 2 to an Engineering Services Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. in an Amount Up to $1,746,516.00 to Provide Additional Professional Engineering Services for the Avondale Haslet Project for a Revised Contract Amount of $2,989,516.00 (2018 Bond Program) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of Amendment No. 2 to City Secretary Contract No. 49555, with HDR Engineering, Inc., in an amount up to $1,746,516.00 for additional engineering phase services and construction support for the Avondale Haslet project (City Project No. 101014). DISCUSSION: The purpose of this Mayor and Council Communication (M&C) is to authorize Amendment No. 2 to the existing engineering services agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR). This amendment will provide for professional services required to produce final plans, specifications, estimates, right-of-way exhibits, bidding, and construction management for the construction of the Avondale Haslet Road project. On June 20, 2017, HDR was awarded contract City Secretary No. 49555, (M&C C-28288) to perform preliminary design for the project. On June 26, 2018, Amendment No.1 (M&C C-28764) was authorized by City Council to revise HDR's contract to increase the budget for the development of plans, specifications, and estimates. On September 1, 2020, City Council approved M&C 20-0621 to revise the scope of the Avondale Haslet Road project from its description in the 2018 bond booklet to include signalized intersections in lieu of roundabouts. Additionally, to improve regional connectivity, staff recommended that the project be re-scoped to provide for replacement of the existing road, rather than rehabilitation and widening, with a four-lane divided roadway in accordance with the current Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP). The project will include underground drainage, street lights, traffic signals, and sidewalks and will connect with the soon-to-start construction Haslet Expressway. The Haslet Expressway will connect State Highway 170 and Interstate Highway 35 to Avondale Haslet. Completion of the Avondale Haslet project by the city will provide a new east-west corridor between Interstate Highway 35 and US Route 81. This project is included in the 2018 Bond Program. Available resources within the General Fund will be used to provide interim financing until debt is issued. Once debt associated with the project is sold, bond proceeds will reimburse the General Fund in accordance with the statement expressing official Intent to Reimburse that was adopted as part of the ordinance canvassing the bond election (Ordinance No. 23209-05-2018) and subsequent actions taken by the Mayor and Council. HDR proposes to complete the additional work for a fee up to $1,746,516.00. Staff considers the fee to be fair and reasonable for the scope of services proposed. The following table summarizes services for the project. Summary of Engineering Services for Contract No. 49555 apps. cfwnet.org/counci I_packet/mc_review.asp? I D=28756&cou ncildate=3/23/2021 1/3 3/24/2021 M&C Review Sum ry of Engineerin Services for C tract 1�.�955 Amount Description Professional Engineering Services for Preliminary Engineering and Project Managemenf of Avondale Haslet Road Tota I Contract Amount $400,000.00 Revised funding Amendment No. 1 for Plans, $g43,000.00 $1,243,000.00 C-28764 Specifications, and Estimates Amendment No. 2 Additional Professional Engineering Services for Plans, Specifications, and Estimates of Revised Scope for Avondale Haslet Road $1,746,516.00�� $2,989,516.00�� This M&C M/WBE Office: HDR Engineering, Inc. is in compliance with the City's BDE Ordinance by committing to 22\% SBE participation on this project. The City's SBE goal on this project is 9\% for Amendment No. 2. This project is located in COUNCIL DISTRICT 7. FISCAL INFORMATION/CERTIFICATION: The Director of Finance certifies that funds are available in the current capital budget, as previously appropriated, in the 2018 Bond Program Fund for the Avondale Haslet Road project to support the approval of the above recommendation and execution of the amendment to the engineering contract. Prior to an expenditure being incurred, the Transportation and Public Works Department has the responsibility to validate the availability of funds. Fund Department � Account � Project Program � Activity � Budget Reference # � Amount ID ID Year (Chartfield 2) apps. cfwnet.org/counci I_packet/mc_review.asp? I D=28756&cou ncildate=3/23/2021 2/3 3/24/2021 Submitted for City Manager's Office by_ Originating Department Head: Additional Information Contact: ATTACHMENTS M&C Review Dana Burghdoff (8018) William Johnson (7801) Monty Hall (8662) Raul Lopez (2457 ) DOC-101014-20210202-Avondale Haslet Project Location.pdf apps. cfwnet.org/counci I_packet/mc_review.asp? I D=28756&cou ncildate=3/23/2021 3/3 SCOPE OF WORK Scope for Engineering Related Professional Services for Street Improvements Amendment No. 2 The scope set forth herein defines the work to be performed by the ENGINEER in completing the project. Both the CITY and ENGINEER have attempted to clearly define the work to be performed and address the needs of the Project. OBJECTIVE The objective of this amendment is to modify the scope of Design Engineering Services for Avondale Haslet Road to incorporate the design of the full MTP concrete curb & gutter roadway section with signalized intersections, assess traffic conditions, proposed ROW parcel descriptions for the City's use in ROW acquisition, and environmental documentation as required for the City for due diligence purposes. Project limits are revised to: from Charlotte Ann Lane to West of Haslet County Line Road (�5,280 feet east of Sendera Ranch Blvd.) project length = 2.44 miles. Work under this agreement includes, but is not limited to, project management, topographic survey, subsurface utility exploration (SUE), right-of-way documentation, traffic assessment, preliminary and final design and bidding for transportation improvements. WORK TO BE PERFORMED Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) Design for Avondale Haslet Road, including 3 signalized intersections; Traffic Assessment; Environmental Documentation Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Project Management Traffic Operational Analysis PS&E Design (60%-100% Submittals) Bid Phase Services Construction Phase Services ROW/Easement Services Survey and Subsurface Utility Engineering Services Environmental & Permitting — Environmental Documentation Quality Control / Quality Assurance TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT. ENGINEER will manage the work outlined in this scope to utilize the ENGINEER's and CITY's time and resources efficiently and effectively. ENGINEER will manage change, communicate effectively, coordinate internally and externally as needed, and proactively address issues with the CITY's Project Manager and others as necessary to make progress on the work. 1.1. Managing the Team • Lead, manage and direct design team activities • Verify quality control is practiced in perFormance of the work • Communicate internally among team members City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 1 of 18 • Task and allocate team resources 1.2. Communications and Reporting DELIVERABLES A. Biweekly meetings with CITY Project Manager (with summaries and action items) B. Monthly invoices C. Monthly progress reports D. Baseline project schedule if applicable per the City of Fort Worth's Schedule Guidance Document. E. Monthly schedule updates with schedule narrative describing any current or anticipated schedule changes F. Monthly M/WBE Report Form and Final Summary Payment Report Form G. Meetings as required for CITY reviews H. TBPE spreadsheet updates at each design phase I. Draft Project Risk Register and provide monthly updates J. Design Checklists, and Construction Contract Document Forms if required TASK 2. TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS The Engineer shall review traffic operational components and evaluate the proposed design based on traffic needs. Traffic Operational Analysis shall include the following: The Engineer shall review and analyze traffic data, existing roadway features (including number of lanes, offset to obstructions, lane widths, intersection operation and geometry), traffic flow patterns, crash patterns and frequencies, and transit and traffic operations. A detailed level of service analysis with SYNCHRO, or other acceptable model shall be perFormed for the current year using current traffic and geometric conditions and for the design year using traffic projections and proposed geometric designs to compare different geometric alternatives. Results of this analysis shall be incorporated into the final design. a. Traffic Siqnal Warrants • The Engineer shall perform Traffic Signal warrant analysis to determine if signal controls are necessary for the following intersections. o Avondale Haslet Road and Willow Springs Road North (Unsignalized/Proposed Signalized) o Avondale Haslet Road and Willow Springs Road South (Unsignalized/Proposed Signalized) o Avondale Haslet Road and Boaz Road/Sendera Ranch Blvd (Signalized) City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 2 of 18 • Refer to TMUTCD to do the traffic signal warrant analysis. • Perform existing and future conditions warrants analysis and prepare a signal warrant report for the study intersections. Results of this analysis shall be incorporated into the final design. • Prepare a draft traffic signal warrant report that documents the analysis and recommendations for review. • Prepare a final traffic signal warrant report that addresses comments from City. b. Traffic Operation Analvsis • PerForm existing conditions (year 2020) and future conditions (years 2025 and 2045) capacity analysis (AM and PM peak hours) utilizing the latest Synchro (10.0) version to evaluate each of the studied intersections along the corridor and to reflect transportation network configurations for existing traffic conditions. • Determine measures of effectiveness (MOEs) for existing and future conditions including level of service, delay, and queue length estimates. • Work with the City of Fort Worth to also include applicable scenarios with potential operational improvements, modified roadway configuration, and capacity additions as needed along the corridor and intersections. The Engineer shall assess the various solutions based on factors such a SYNCHRO/HCS delay, ROW impact, environmental constraints, access points, ingress and egress, and safety to evaluate feasibility of these options. The Engineer shall vet and refine all the ideas to meet the needs of the project. The Engineer shall test the traditional capacity improvements in SYNCHRO. • The Engineer will develop the required traffic technical analyses and report for the approval of the final design. Subsurface Utility Engineering: ENGINEER will provide Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) per Task 7. Environmental & Permitting: ENGINEER will provide conceptual environmental & permitting per Task 8. ASSUMPTIONS CITY to provide Letter of Map Revisions (LOMR) and Conditional Letter of Map Revisions (CLOMR) for other projects that may affect the work outlined in this scope. For projects where land acquisition is necessary, copies of title commitments would need to be provided by the CITY as soon as available to determine / confirm existence of utility easements which may require further coordination. If CITY requires any data collection, traffic forecasting, traffic projections, or other related detailed traffic operational tasks, they shall be included under a separate contract. DELIVERABLES A. None City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 3 of 18 TASK 3. PS&E DESIGN (60%, 90%, 100% Submittals) Design plans and specifications shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project Schedule. ENGINEER will develop the Preliminary 60°/o design of the infrastructure as follows. 3.1. Roadway Design Package Development of Preliminary Design Drawings and Specifications shall include the following: • A Project Control Sheet, showing all Control Points, used or set while gathering data. Generally, on a scale of not less than 1:400. The following information shall be indicated for each Control Point: Identified (i.e. existing City Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8" Iron Rod); X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system, and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on City Datum only; descriptive location (i.e. set in the centerline of the inlet in the South curb line). • Updated existing and proposed typical section sheets. • Updated roadway plan and profile sheets displaying station and coordinate data for all horizontal alignment P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s; station and elevation data of all vertical profile P.C.'s, P.T.'s, P.I.'s, low points, and high points; lengths of vertical curves, grades, K values, e, and vertical clearances where required (over utilities). • Bearings given on all proposed centerlines, or baselines. • Intersection layout sheets including ROW lines, horizontal alignments, utilities, curbs, sidewalks, lane dimensions and arrows, and proposed paving contours or spot elevations. • Preliminary roadway details to include curbs, curb expansion joints, driveways, sidewalks, and pavement details. • Traffic Control Plan: including all construction signage and pavement markings which will be in accordance with the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Develop a traffic control plan utilizing standard traffic reroute configurations posted as "Typicals" on the CITY's BIM 360 website. The typical need not be sealed individually, if included in the sealed contract documents. Develop supplemental traffic control drawings as needed for review and approval by the Traffic Division of the Transportation and Public Works Department. Provide a written summary of the distinct phases to take place during construction operations to include road and/or lane closures, limited access to adjacent properties, and limited access to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Traffic Control Narrative shall be included describing construction phasing, sequence of work, any proposed detours, etc. • Utilities: Proposed phasing of any water and sanitary sewer replacements/adjustments required, and/or drainage work that is included in this project documented in both the project schedule and narrative form, utility plan sheets showing SUE information and proposed water & sanitary sewer adjustments. Water & sanitary sewer replacements, relocations, or new main lines are NOT included in this contract. • Drainage details: revisions to 30% plans, incorporate 60% roadway design, drainage general notes sheet, storm drain layout sheets showing location and size of all inlets, manholes, junction boxes, culverts and piping to include storm drain profiles showing existing and proposed flow lines, flows, lengths and slopes of pipe, top of ground profile over pipe and connections to existing or proposed storm sewer systems. • Drainage details for special structures (headwalls, junction boxes, etc.) • HEN-2 Crossing: ENGINEER will review plans to assess the potential impacts per the permit requirements. Input and coordination on the design work will be required City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 4 of 18 to avoid and minimize impacts (e.g. waters of the U.S.) to the extent practicable. Permit recommendations will be made based on the proposed impacts. ENGINEER will delineate the watershed based on contour data and field verification and document existing street, right-of-way and storm drain capacities for the subject site. A drainage area map will be drawn at maximum 1" = 200' scale from available 2-foot contour data with the contours labeled. All calculations shall conform to CITY criteria per the CITY's design manual. All locations in the project area where 100- year runoff exceeds available storm drain and right-of-way capacities shall be clearly identified. The ENGINEER's responsibility includes recommendations for improvements of the existing system as deemed reasonable and consistent with CITY standards. For all crossings other than HEN-2, prepare a hydrologic analysis utilizing the appropriate method as specified in the FTW Manual Table 3.3 for the 1-, 10-, 25- and 100-year "design" storm events. The hydrologic analysis will focus on a fully developed watershed as specified in the FTW Manual. For crossing HEN-2, per Table 3.4 of the FTW Manual, use the Unit Hydrograph Method (drainage area is approximately 4 square miles). Calculate curve numbers and time of concentration flow paths using Arc-GIS. Preliminary hydrology & hydraulic analysis for Tributary to HEN-2 crossing the project (HEC-RAS). Coordinate the hydraulic study with the roadway profiles to determine if mitigation of channel is required. The design will follow Chapter 3.8.4 of the FTW Manual. Design criteria shall include: o Per FTW Manual, the HEN-2 bridge shall be designed for the flood mitigation storm (1 % AEP or 100-year) for fully developed watershed conditions. o Per the FTW Manual, no increase in downstream discharge will be allowed because of the roadway improvements. o No increase in flood elevations greater than 0.1 feet in 1-, 5-, and 100-year storm events unless contained in the channel and within the right-of-way. a. Incorporate channel cross sections (generated from ground survey and best available LiDAR or contour data) into HEC-RAS 5.0.3 1-D model (via HEC-Geo RAS in Arc-GIS) and develop existing condition HEC-RAS model. b. Coordinate with roadway engineers to optimize the roadway approach geometry. c. Coordination with electric utility on street illumination. d. Quantify project impacts and evaluate alternatives to mitigate any increase in proposed base (100-year) flood water elevations or fill. Chapter 3.7 of the FTW Manual will be closely followed to mitigate any impacts to the floodplain. Assess excess runoff produced by proposed roadway improvement and determine if and where detention is required prior to release to downstream properties Signing, pavement marking, and illumination plans. Signals at 3 intersections: Willow Springs North, South, and Sendera Ranch Blvd intersections. • Documentation of key design decisions. • Estimates of probable construction cost. City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 5 of 18 • Quantity Summary by Sheet. PS&E plans shall contain quantity summary sheets including summaries of bid items and quantities using the CITY standard bid items and format. • Retaining Walls. Plans shall include Retaining Wall layouts and details including cast-in- place retaining walls using CITY/TxDOT standards. Assumed are 2 CIP walls and 4 sidewalk walls. Geotechnical borings, analysis, and global stability, and structural wall design is NOT included in this scope. • Landscaping. Plans to include Landscaping Detail plans on stamped concrete/median/concrete riprap as required. • Irrigation. Irrigation plans and details shall NOT be included in this scope. • Noise Walls. Plans to include Noise Wall Layouts and details if required. 3.2. Geotechnical Investigation & Pavement Design Soil investigations, including field and laboratory tests, borings, related engineering analysis and recommendations for determining soil conditions will be made. • The ENGINEER shall prepare a detailed geotechnical engineering study and pavement design in conformance with the latest edition of the City Of Fort Worth Pavement Design Manual. The study shall include recommendations regarding utility backfill recommendations and identify existing groundwater elevation at each boring. 3.3 Constructability Review • Prior to the 60 percent review meeting with the CITY, the ENGINEER shall schedule and attend a project site visit with the CITY Project Manager and Construction personnel to walk the project. The ENGINEER shall summarize the CITY's comments from the field visit and submit this information to the CITY in writing. 3.4 Public Meeting After the preliminary plans have been reviewed and approved by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall prepare project exhibits, and attend public meeting to help explain the proposed project to residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location, prepare and mail the invitation letters to the affected customers. The ENGINEER shall coordinate with the CITY GIS staff to identify affected property owners/residents and develop a spreadsheet listing addresses of those to invite to the public meeting. 3.5 Utility Clearance The ENGINEER will consult with the CITY's Transportation and Public Works Department, Water Department, and other CITY departments, public utilities, private utilities, private utilities and government agencies to determine the approximate location of above and underground utilities, and other facilities (current and future) that have an impact or influence on the project. ENGINEER will design CITY facilities to avoid or minimize conflicts with existing utilities, and where known and possible consider potential future utilities in designs. (Assume 24 Months) o Monthly Utility Progress Meetings with CITY ■ Notify CITY of all data received from Utility Owners (continuous) ■ Provide Status of Proposed Relocation Designs (continuous) o Progress Meetings with Utility Owners (Assume 3 meetings per Owner) o Attend Site Reviews with Utility Owners (Assume 10 trips) o Provide Project Information, Notifications and Exhibits, Request Records City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 6 of 18 o Obtain Verification of Existing and Proposed Facilities o Update Utility Contact List The ENGINEER will utilize the conflict matrix spreadsheet previously developed and revise it to include this scope's SUE and project information. The spreadsheet will include location of each conflict with the project and existing utilities found during SUE investigation. o Update Conflict Matrix for analysis o Create Conflict Evidence o Review and Coordinate with Utility Owners to Resolve Conflicts o Assist the CITY with Utility Conflict Resolutions o Evaluate Alternatives o Review Estimates and Schedules (MAX of 9 Utility Owners) o Create/Update Utility Layout(s) o Review Permits and Proposed Utility Designs (MAX of 9 Utility Owners) The ENGINEER shall upload individual DWF files for each plan sheet of the approved preliminary plan set to the designated project folder in BIM 360 for forwarding to all utility companies which have facilities within the limits of the project. ASSUMPTIONS • Drainage design shall follow the SDS Drainage Study Checklist. All storm water calculations and design shall conform to the latest City of Fort Worth iSWM Storm Water Criteria Manual, as of November 2020. • Geotechnical Investigation: 28 borings for pavement design at approximately 500' spacing and 20' depth. Geotechnical borings, analysis, and global stability for retaining walls are NOT included in this scope. • Retaining Wall Layouts. Plans shall include Retaining Wall layouts and details including cast-in-place retaining walls using CITY/TxDOT standards. Assumed are 2 CIP walls and 4 sidewalk walls. Structural wall design is NOT included in this scope. Retaining walls aesthetics or landscape panels are NOT included in scope. • Noise Wall Layouts. Plans to include Noise Wall Layouts and details if required. Maximum total length of noise walls shall be 2000 ft. Noise walls aesthetics or landscape panels are NOT included in scope. • Tree removal, mitigation, permits, planting, or any items regarding Urban Forestry within CFW shall NOT be included in scope • The CITY's front end and technical specifications will be used. The ENGINEER shall supplement the technical specifications if needed. • Utility plan sheets showing SUE information and proposed water & sanitary sewer adjustments to be submitted. Water & Sanitary Sewer relocation design are not included in this scope and will be done by others if needed. • Temporary signals will not be required. • Utility Installation Monitoring and Verification Excluded [Supplement Required for this Task if needed] City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 7 of 18 • Utility Agreement Package Preparation Excluded [Supplement Required for this Task if needed] 60% DELIVERABLES A. 60% Design Plans and specifications (PDF) 20 sets — 11 "x17" plans and specifications B. Design DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated project folder in BIM 360 C. Utility Conflict Matrix spreadsheet D. Utility Clearance PDF drawings uploaded to BIM 360 E. iSWM Checklist F. SDS Drainage Study Checklist G. Draft Floodplain Development Permit application (if required) H. Geotechnical Report I. Construction Cost Estimate (PDF and Excel) J. Spreadsheet of affected property owner addresses for Public Meeting invites K. Public Meeting exhibits L. Retaining Wall Layouts Upon approval of the 60°/o plans, ENGINEER will prepare Final construction plans as follows: • Final draft construction plans (90°/o) and specifications shall be submitted to CITY per the approved Project Schedule. • Following a 90% construction plan review meeting with the CITY, the ENGINEER shall submit Final Plans (100%) to the CITY per the approved Project Schedule. Each plan sheet shall be stamped, dated, and signed by the ENGINEER registered in State of Texas. • The ENGINEER shall submit a final design estimate of probable construction cost with the 90%, and 100°/o design packages. This estimate shall use ONLY standard CITY bid items unless otherwise approved by the CITY. ASSUMPTIONS • The CITY's front end and technical specifications will be used. The ENGINEER shall supplement the technical specifications if needed. • One comment resolution meeting with the CITY for each submittal. 90% and 100% DELIVERABLES A. 90% construction plans and specifications (PDF): 14 sets — 11 "x17" plans and 1 set 22"x34" plans printed, 2 comb or spiral bound sets printed specifications B. 100% construction plans and specifications (PDF): 6 sets — 11 "x17" plans and 1 set 22"x34" plans printed, 2 comb or spiral bound sets printed specifications C. DWF files created from design CAD drawings will be uploaded to the designated project folder in BIM 360 D. Updated Utility Clearance DWF drawings uploaded to BIM 360 E. Final iSWM Checklist F. Final Floodplain Development Permit application (if required) G. Final Geotechnical Report City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 8 of 18 H. Detailed estimates of probable construction costs including summaries of bid items and quantities using the CITY's standard bid items and format. Original cover page in mylar for the signatures of authorized CITY officials J. Quantity Summary by Sheet K. Retaining Wall layouts L. Landscaping details M. Final Construction Contract Document Forms: Significant Project Procedures (Form 2229), Bid Document Checklist, Sample Liquidated Damages Calculations, Sample Bidder Certification, Child Support Statement, State of Texas Child Support Business Ownership Form, Engineering and Architectural Letter of Authority Checklist. ASSUMPTIONS Any opinions of probable project cost or probable construction cost provided by ENGINEER are made on the basis of information available to ENGINEER and on the basis of ENGINEER's experience and qualifications, and represents its judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. However, since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the contractor(s') methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual project or construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost ENGINEER prepares. TASK 4. BID PHASE SERVICES ENGINEER will support the bid phase of the project as follows: The ENGINEER shall upload all plans and contract documents onto BIM 360 for access to potential bidders. o Contract documents shall be uploaded in a.xls file. o Unit Price Proposal documents are to be created utilizing the CITY specified spreadsheet workbook, Bid Proposal Worksheet Template, and will be populated and configured so that all pages are complete and the Summary Worksheet(s) in the workbook detail and automatically summarize the totals from the inserted Unit Price Proposal document worksheets. o Plan Sets are to be uploaded to BIM 360 in .pdf. The .pdf will consist of one file of the entire plan set. The ENGINEER will assist the CITY PM in answering bidders' questions and requests for additional information. The procedures shall include a log of all significant bidders' questions and requests and the response thereto. The log shall be housed and maintained in the project's BIM 360 folder titled Request for Information. The ENGINEER will provide technical interpretation of the contract bid documents and will prepare proposed responses to all bidders' questions and requests, in the form of addenda. The ENGINEER shall upload all approved addenda onto BIM 360 and mail addenda to all plan holders. Attend the prebid conference in support of the CITY. City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 9 of 18 • Assist the CITY in determining the qualifications and acceptability of prospective contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers. • When substitution prior to award of contracts is allowed in the contract documents, the ENGINEER will advise the CITY as to the acceptability of alternate materials and equipment proposed by bidders. • Attend the bid opening in support of the CITY. • Tabulate and review all bids received for the construction project, assist the CITY in evaluating bids, and recommend award of the contract. A copy of the Bid Tabulation is to be uploaded into the project's Bid Responses folder on BIM 360. • Incorporate all addenda into the contract documents and issue Conformed for Construction (CFC) plans & specifications. ASSUMPTIONS • The project will be bid only once and awarded to one contractor. DELIVERABLES A. Addenda B. Bid tabulations and bid analysis C. Recommendation of award D. Full size 22"x34" construction documents PDFs available on BIM 360 for Contractors to download E. Conformed for Construction plans and specifications, delivered to the CITY 0 1 copy full size 22"x34" paper plans 0 10 sets 11 "x17" paper plans 0 10 comb or spiral bound specifications sets 0 10 copies Geotechnical Report TASK 5. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES ENGINEER will support the construction phase of the project as follows: 5.1 Construction Support • The ENGINEER shall attend the preconstruction conference. • After the pre-construction conference, the ENGINEER shall provide project exhibits and attend public meeting to help explain the proposed project to residents. The CITY shall select a suitable location and mail the invitation letters to the affected customers. • The ENGINEER shall visit the project site at requested intervals as construction proceeds to observe and report on progress. • The ENGINEER shall review shop drawings, samples and other submittals submitted by the contractor for general conformance with the design concepts and general compliance with the requirements of the contract for construction. Such review shall not relieve the Contractor from its responsibility for performance in accordance with the contract for construction, nor is such review a guarantee that the work covered by the shop drawings, samples and submittals is free of errors, inconsistencies or omissions. The ENGINEER shall log and track all shop drawings, samples and other submittals in BIM 360. • As requested by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall provide necessary interpretations and clarifications of contract documents, review change orders, and make recommendations as to the acceptability of the work. City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 10 of 18 The ENGINEER shall attend the "Final" project walk through and assist with preparation of final punch list. In performing Construction Phase Services, ENGINEER shall not control or have charge of, and shall not be responsible for, construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures of construction, health or safety programs or precautions connected with the work and shall not manage, supervise, control or have charge of construction. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of construction contractor(s) or other parties on the project. The CITY agrees to include a provision in the construction contract with its contractor(s) requiring them to name ENGINEER as an additional insured on contractor(s') commercial general liability insurance. 5.2 Record Drawings • The ENGINEER shall prepare record drawings from information submitted by the inspector and/or Contractor. The drawings shall be submitted as full size (22" x 34") mylar drawings. Also, 5 sets of full size (22" x 34") paper plans shall be submitted for construction inspection. • Record drawings will also be submitted in PDF and DWF formats. There will be one (1) PDF file containing all associated sheets of the plan set. • Both PDF and DWF files shall be uploaded to the projecYs Record Drawing folder in BIM 360. ASSUMPTIONS • 3 site visits are assumed. • 10 submittal reviews are assumed. • 20 RFI's are assumed. • 3 Change Orders is assumed. DELIVERABLES A. Public meeting exhibits B. Response to Contractor's RFIs C. Review of Change Orders D. Review of shop drawings E. Final Punch List items F. Record Drawings TASK 6. ROW/EASEMENT SERVICES ENGINEER will support and perForm activities related to ROW and land as outlined below, per scoping direction and guidance from the CITY's Project Manager. 6.1 Right-of-Way Research & Document Preparation • The ENGINEER shall determine rights-of-way, easements needs for construction of the project. Required temporary and permanent easements will be identified based on available information and recommendations will be made for approval by the CITY. City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 11 of 18 • The ENGINEER shall prepare Parcel Descriptions sealed by a RPLS to be used to obtain right-of-way and permanent and/or temporary easements required to construct the improvements. • The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's BIM 360 site. Temporary Right of Entry Preparation and Submittal • Prior to construction, the ENGINEER shall prepare, mail and obtain Temporary Right of Entries from landowners. It is assumed that letters will only be required for land owners adjacent to temporary construction easements or who are directly affected by the project and no easement is required to enter their property. • The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's BIM 360 site. ASSUMPTIONS Right-of-Way research includes review of property/right-of-way records based on current internet-based Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) information available at the start of the project and available on-ground property information (i.e. iron rods, fences, stakes, etc.). It does not include effort for chain of title research, parent track research, additional research for easements not included in the TAD, right-of-way takings, easement vacations and abandonments, right-of-way vacations, and street closures. DELIVERABLES A. Easement exhibits and meets and bounds provided on CITY forms. B. Temporary Right of Entry Letters TASK 7. SURVEY AND SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEER will provide survey support. Survey and aerial mapping done under previous task orders will be used and supplemented per the following: 7.1 Design Survey • ENGINEER/SURVEYOR will perform field surveys to collect horizontal and vertical elevations and other information needed by ENGINEER in design and preparation of plans for the project covering asphalt transition areas, HEC-RAS modeling sections, and existing driveway culverts. • Provide supplemental topographic/design survey along the proposed route. The survey will include locating all utility signs and markers, all visible above ground utilities and drainage structures, and cross sections. • Deliverables will include modified digital files in .dgn format combining all supplemental survey data into the previous topographic data. Other deliverables will include copies of field notes and field drawings, ASCII point file of all points located in the survey. City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 12 of 18 • The minimum survey information to be provided on the plans shall include the following: o A Project Control Sheet, showing ALL Control Points & Benchmarks (approximately 14 points), used or set while gathering data. Generally, on a scale of not less than 1:400: The following information about each Control Point: a. Identified (Existing. CITY Monument #8901, PK Nail, 5/8" Iron Rod) b. X, Y and Z Coordinates, in an identified coordinate system, and a referred bearing base. Z coordinate on CITY Datum only. c. Descriptive Location (Ex. Set in the centerline of the inlet in the South curb line of North Side Drive at the East end of radius at the Southeast corner of North Side Drive and North Main Street). • Topographic ground survey is necessary to model the Trib to HEN-2 and determine any hydraulic impact. The following are activities required for hydraulic survey per this scope of work: o Channel cross sections are required. Cross sections will be based on orientation and spacing as determined by the Engineer in coordination with the City. The width of the cross sections shall cover the roadway and top of the channel over bank extending at least 50 feet to the north. Cross sections shall contain a minimum of 9 points at each of the following locations: left natural ground; top of left bank; toe of slope; 3 shots at channel bottom including flow line of channel; toe of slope; right top of bank; and right natural ground, as well as, and any grade breaks within the channel or in the overbank areas beyond the channel banks. Provide digital photos corresponding to each cross section. o Cross sections will be taken at right angles to contours. o Detailed survey of existing drainage features (inlets, headwalls, junction boxes, etc.) within project limits and 100 feet past limits. Temporary Right of Entry Preparation and Submittal Prepare Permit-To-Survey Letters and obtain permission from the owner of each affected property to perform the survey. If property owners fail to approve within three weeks from receipt of permission letter, ENGINEER will pursue other avenues of obtaining access. The documentation shall be provided in conformance with the checklists and templates available on the CITY's BIM 360 site. 7.2 Subsurface Utility Engineering Provide SubsurFace Utility Engineering (SUE) to Quality Level B as described below. The SUE shall be performed in accordance with Cl/ASCE 38-02. Utilities to be designated include gas, telecommunications, electric, traffic signals, storm, water and sanitary sewer. • Quality Level B(QL"B") — Two-dimensional (x,y) information obtained through the application and interpretation of non-destructive surface geophysical methods. City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 13 of 18 Also known as "designating" this quality level provides the horizontal position of subsurface utilities within approximately one foot. • Quality Level A(QL"A") — Three dimensional (x,y,z) utility information obtained utilizing non-destructive vacuum excavation equipment to expose utilities at critical points which are then tied down by surveying. Also known as "locating", this quality level provides precise horizontal and vertical positioning of utilities within approximately 0.05 feet. • Resolve differences between designated utilities and utility records and surveyed appurtenances. • Recommend additional measures to resolve differences if they still exist. Recommendations may include additional or different surface geophysical methods, exploratory excavation, or upgrade to Quality Level A data. • As an alternative to the physical marking of lines, the ENGINEER may, with CITY's approval, utilize other means of data collection, storage, retrieval, and reduction that enables the correlation of surface geophysical data to the project's survey control. Natural Gas Pipeline Coordination • Coordination with Devon Energy/owner of natural gas pipeline easement north of Willow Spring Rd to for standard protection of existing line that may be impacted by the project ASSUMPTIONS • Construction control will be set by the Contractor. • Level A SUE will require up to 20 test holes. • Survey of type and size of trees or other plants are NOT included is this scope. DELIVERABLES A. Copies of field survey data and notes used and developed for design signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor. B. Drawing of the project layout with dimensions and coordinate list. TASK 8. ENVIRONMENTAL & PERMITTING — Local Government Due Diligence Documentation ENGINEER will provide permitting support for the CITY to obtain agreements and/or permits normally required for a project of this size and type, as follows. 8.1 Project Development and CITY Coordination • The Engineer shall coordinate with the City of Fort Worth to scope and develop environmental due diligence documents for the Project. Based on initial assessments this scope will be based on the development and production with associated public involvement activities. City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 14 of 18 • The Engineer shall assist the City to determine the level of due diligence documentation required and confirm the resource studies needed. 8.2 Technical Reports and Environmental Documentation • The Engineer shall develop the required technical analyses and reports required for the documentation including: • Endangered Species Analysis • Waters of the U.S. and Permitting Table. If a USACE Nationwide Permit Pre- Construction Notification, or Individual Permit are required, work will be done under a supplemental work authorization • Archeological Background Study • Archeological Permit and Survey, if required. Pedestrian survey only. If inechanical excavation is required, work will be done under a supplemental work authorization • Archeological Survey Report, if needed • Hazardous Materials ISA Report Environmental Permitting • Per floodplain mitigation improvements on the channel, ENGINEER will assess the potential environmental impacts and requirements. Permit recommendations will be made based on the proposed impacts. 8.3 Environmental Permitting and Commitments (EPIC) Sheet — NOT INCLUDED • The Engineer shall NOT develop the environmental EPIC sheets for inclusion in the PS&E package(s). Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (to be submitted within PS&E Design plans) to include the following: ENGINEER will prepare the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) required for the Project for use by the Contractor during construction, on the Erosion Control General Notes plan sheet. ENGINEER will prepare erosion control plan drawings and details for proposed SWPPP improvement that the Contractor must use during construction. Contractor will be responsible for filing the appropriate forms & SWPPP with appropriate regulatory agencies. 8.4 Public Involvement • The Engineer shall develop the Right of Entry letters for required environmental surveys. This effort will provide two (2) rounds of ROE letters and a GIS status map of the ROE process • The Engineer shall develop environmental displays, as needed, and attend a public meeting for the project 8.5 Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) • Identify and analyze the requirements of the Texas Architectural Barriers Act, Chapter 68 Texas Administrative Code, and become familiar with the governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project. • Submit construction documents to the TDLR City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 15 of 18 • Completing all TDLR forms/applications necessary • Obtain the Notice of Substantial Compliance from the TDLR • Request an inspection from TDLR or a TDLR locally approved Registered Accessibility Specialist no later than 30 calendar days after construction substantial completion. Advise the CITY in writing of the results of the inspection. • Registered Accessibility Specialist to complete construction plans at each milestone • Responding to agency comments and requests ASSUMPTIONS • If EPIC sheets are required, they shall be included under a separate contract. • Permit preparation will begin after approval of the Conceptual Design. • If a USACE Nationwide Permit Pre-Construction Notification, or Individual Permit are required, work will be done under a supplemental work authorization DELIVERABLES A. Technical Reports, Draft and Final Documents B. Right of Entry letters and GIS status map C. Public Meeting environmental displays and attendance D. SWPPP (Erosion Control General Notes) & Erosion Control plans submitted with the Roadway Plans E. TDLR Approval TASK 9. QUALITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE • ENGINEER to provide to the City a Quality Control/ Quality Assurance Plan (QC/QA Plan) outlining the ENGINEER's method of checking the calculations, plans, specifications, and estimates. • ENGINEER is responsible for and shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality and consistency of plans. • If, at any time, during the course of reviewing a submittal of any item it becomes apparent to the CITY that the submittal contains errors, omissions, and inconsistencies, the CITY may cease its review and return the submittal to the ENGINEER immediately for appropriate action. A submittal returned to the ENGINEER for this reason may be rejected by the CITY Project Manager. 9.1 QC/QA of Survey and SUE Data • The ENGINEER's Surveyor shall perform Quality Control/ Quality Assurance on all procedures, field surveys, data, and products prior to delivery to the CITY. The CITY may also require the ENGINEER's Surveyor to perForm a City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 16 of 18 Quality Assurance review of the survey and/or subsurface utility engineering (SUE) work perFormed by other surveyors and SUE providers. • ENGINEER's Surveyor shall certify in writing via a letter that the survey information provided has undergone a Quality Control/ Quality Assurance process. • ENGINEER's SubsurFace Utility Engineering provider shall certify in writing via a letter that the SUE information provided has undergone a Quality Control/ Quality Assurance process. 9.2 QC/QA of Design Documentation • ENGINEER shall perform a QC/QA review of all documents being submitted for review at all stages of the design including the 60%, 90°/o and Final Document design review submittals. QA should be perFormed by an individual within the firm who is not on the design team. ENGINEER is to acknowledge that each item on the Detailed Checklist has been included by checking "done" on the checklist. If a particular checklist item is not applicable, this should be indicated by checking "N/A". If an entire checklist is not applicable, this should be indicated by checking every item on the list as "N/A" and still included with the submittal. The ENGINEER shall use the Detailed Checklist provided by CITY. A Comment Resolution Log must be used to document conflicting comments between reviewers and to highlight comments made by the CITY that the ENGINEER is not incorporating into the design documents along with the associated explanation. The ENGINEER shall use the Comment Resolution Log provided by CITY. The documentation of a QC/QA review includes (1) a copy of the color-coded, original marked-up document (or "checkprint") developed during the QA checking process and/or review forms which sequentially list documents and associated comments; and (2) a QC sign-off sheet with signatures of the personnel involved in the checking process. Mark-ups may also be documented using the Comment Resolution Log. • Evidence of the QC/QA review will be required to accompany all submittals. Documentation shall include, but is not limited to, the following items: - PDF of the completed Detailed Checklists - PDF of the QC/QA checkprint of the calculations, plans, specifications, and estimates demonstrating that a review has been undertaken; - PDF of previous review comments (if any) and the ENGINERR's responses to those comments in the Comment Resolution Log. • If any of the above information is missing, is incomplete or if any comments are not adequately addressed; the CITY may contact the ENGINEER and request the missing information. If the ENGINEER does not respond to the request within 1 business day, the CITY shall reject the submittal. No City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 17 of 18 additional time will be granted for a returned submittal. • If the ENGINEER has not adequately addressed the comments, the submittal shall be rejected and returned to the ENGINEER immediately to address the issues. ASSUMPTIONS • All submittals to the City will be Quality checked prior to submission. • A PDF of the QC/QA documentation will be uploaded to the project folder in BIM 360. DELIVERABLES A. QC/QA documentation City of Fort Worth, Texas PN101014 Amendment Scope Page 18 of 18 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION Design Services for Avondale Haslet Road City Project No. 101014 Time and Materials with Rate Schedule Project Compensation A. The ENGINEER shall be compensated for personnel time, non-labor expenses, and subcontract expenses in performing services enumerated in Attachment A as follows: i. Personnel Time. Personnel time shall be compensated based upon hours worked directly in performing the PROJECT multiplied by the appropriate Labor Cateqory Rate for the ENGINEER's team member performing the work. Labor Cateqory Rate as presented in the rate schedule table below is the rate for each labor category performing the work and includes all direct salaries, overhead, and profit. Labor Category Minimum Maximum Rate* Rate* $/hour $/hour Pro'ect Director 220 268 Sr. Project Manager 200 249 Project Mana er / Task Leader 170 215 Sr. En ineer 150 185 Utilit Coordinator 130 155 En ineer 129 155 EIT 113 137 GIS 95 120 CADD 90 115 Admin / Accountin 75 92 Sr. Environmental Planner 166 199 Environmental Planner IV 149 182 Environmental Planner III 130 159 Environmental Planner II 99 121 * Direct Rates w/ 2.92 multiplier would be reflected in the monthly invoice. ii. Non-Labor Expenses. Non-labor expenses shall be reimbursed as Direct Expenses at invoice or internal office cost. Direct Expenses (non-labor) include, but are not limited to, mileage, travel and lodging expenses, mail, supplies, printing and reproduction services, other direct expenses associated with delivery of the work; plus applicable sales, use, value added, business transfer, gross receipts, or other similar taxes. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 8.09.2012 Page 1 of 4 B-1 ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION iii. Subcontract Expenses. Subcontract expenses and outside services shall be reimbursed at cost to ENGINEER plus a markup of ten percent (10%). iv. Budgets. ENGINEER will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget and will keep the City informed of progress toward that end so that the budget or work effort can be adjusted if found necessary. ENGINEER is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budgets, as may be adjusted, nor is the City obligated to pay ENGINEER beyond these limits. If ENGINEER projects, in the course of providing the necessary services, that the PROJECT cost presented in Article 2 of this Agreement will be exceeded, whether by change in scope of the project, increased costs or other conditions, the ENGINEER shall immediately report such fact to the City and, if so instructed by the City, shall suspend all work hereunder. When any budget has been increased, ENGINEER's excess costs expended prior to such increase will be allowable to the same extent as if such costs had been incurred after the approved increase. B. The ENGINEER shall be paid monthly payments as described in Section II - Method of Payment. Method of Payment A. The ENGINEER shall be paid by the City based upon an invoice created on the basis of statements prepared from the books and records of account of the ENGINEER, based on the actual hours and costs expended by the ENGINEER in performing the work. B. Each invoice shall be verified as to its accuracy and compliance with the terms of this Agreement by an officer of the ENGINEER. C. ENGINEER shall prepare and submit invoices in the format and including content as presented in Exhibit B-1. D. Payment of invoices will be subject to certification by the City that such work has been performed. III. Progress Reports A. The ENGINEER shall prepare and submit to the designated representative of the Transportation and Public Works Department monthly progress reports and schedules in the format required by the City. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 8.09.2012 Page 2 of 4 � ATTACHMENT B COMPENSATION � Summary of Total Project Fees Firm Primary Responsibility Prime Consultant HDR Engineer Proposed MBE/SBE Sub-Consultants Criado & Associates ROW, SUE HVJ Geotech Altura Solutions TDLR Non-MBE/SBE Consultants TOTAL Fee Amount % $ 1,347,955 77.2% $ 314,282 18.0% $ 77,134 4.4% $ 7,145 0.4% $ 1,746,516 100% Project Number & Name Total Fee MBE/SBE Fee MBE/SBE % CPN 101014 Avondale Haslet Road $ 1,746,516 $ 398,561 22.8% City MBE/SBE Goal = 9 % City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 8.09.2012 Page 3 of 4 Consultant Committed Goal = 22.8 % B-3 EXHIBIT "B-1" ENGINEER INVOICE (Supplement to Attachment B) Insert required invoice format following this page, including negotiated total budget and allocations of budgets across desired work types and work phases. City of Fort Worth, Texas Attachment B PMO Official Release Date: 8.09.2012 Page 4 of 4 � �, PROJECT SCHEDULE CPN 101014 AVONDALE HASLET ROAD PHASE BEGIN COMPLETE COMMENTS Schematic 30% Ju1-2020 Aug-2020 Previously submitted PS&E 30% Ju1-2020 Aug-2020 Previously submitted Survey Nov-2020 Feb-2021 SUE Apr-2021 Ju1-2021 ROW Acquisition Apr-2021 Apr-2022 Environmental/Permitting Jan-2021 Jan-2022 60% PS&E Apr-2021 Jun-2021 60 days assumed. Design only. 60% PS&E Walls Ju1-2021 Aug-2021 30 days assumed. Design only. Utility Relocation Ju1-2021 Ju1-2023 90% PS&E Sep-2021 Oct-2021 45-60 days assumed. Design only. 100% PS&E Nov-2021 Dec-2021 45-60 days assumed. Design only. Letting Date - Dec-2023 Assume 8 months for Advertising, Bidding, M&C, Bid & Award Phase Dec-2023 Aug-2024 M/WBE, Construction Contract Execution Construction Aug-2024 Apr-2027 Assumes 33 months for 2.4 miles O K v3x w O �' �Ovc' Y C p d Q O Z y C a � y0� ° E �� ,�a w � m � O�Za a Q N J H C � W No �� L 8 S ' �» H � �° _ _ - _ _ _ _ �� _ _ _ _ _ _ �R _ _ S� ��� E � p � o Q u ¢ �f m E � w`g E c E � a - o E c 2 - 0 a` V - u� o q u f m � $ o �y�o '�o Er -� _ aa = _ _ _a�iE o-�.c E E� 'c� � � E Bi _ q' 'z _ aE �E €d �E �s 'E \ a=_' .e�s ar na �o i E � � � _ '°.E � c - o� 3E �E �d9 -- - a.z�� ' s"�� P�Ez -_ � _ °vE � � E�- o _ ' z3E ,�`� w ' � e. � �,z� �n 3 � ;y�o�3w � Eo $ °� 3 - ` r ; � -„ ? . E ° m � e� �°v-� � o-- m �° &- � . . ° � E s `E , E . sT � 3 � E �e - �� E $ _E � E" � °c'E Amo�_ � ���a '° A� e & E� z e ,�&v�_ ' �&z�� oeod � �`o�= � �,ouuEa_EEE��8maE 3" �E_c���ea �ia ��Em A �E8.- �.Eoo� ' & as -az�o� i � ' c� v` �E 3a 00 O K v3x w O �' �Ovc' Y C p d Q O Z y C a � y0� ° E �� ,�a w � m � O�Za a Q N J H C � W No e �� L g � � y � � ° _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `�° 8 S� «�� E � m mc o m m eo o eo eo 0 00 0 Q u ¢ �f m E�- �a w`g E c E � a - o E c 2 - 0 a` V _ n$ q u fm a� 'n� c� w`f �5 E E LL - _ � _ _ EE ' E E _o� _ 3 .e �$ o_ '_ z � _ _ � c = � O '3° c - � � � � m E $ _ m � _ q' E � - _ c - _ c _ � ��� � � o � x 2�Ov -- - Ea �a L�''�° v� ' ,OoE = ¢'S. � - _ a_ _ n� n ? o n02 N c E o E `v'_ m �>�'" € - E35 3 3€ y � 3 mq aon a�o _ Z Z'u� - Z _ E m a � � 3, _ e y z _ E °�E�ia`m�z �`- - __ �-E� ' _ _ - ' E�` °'`E E� ' vE' ��'°_ � °- da _ _ - _ _ ry � cZv �do c _ _ c'°a _ _ - �+� �'G�= _ m�i c�+c - - o'G �+�+c �eo K'z�o '�E_ Eo _ ' ' _ _ ' _ _ _ _ _ _ € d E � � o _ _ ' ' _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 � -d & rc 3 � _ = 3 a - o�a'=n� a�a"_ ' _a3a '�5=u ' '- _ ooa _�a �o - w`3 �2 � E 3a 00 � � v3x „o" �Ovc' NC'�Z Q � y0� ° E �� ,�a w � m � p='�E � a a Q N J H C � W �IIIIIIIIIII■IIIII�I� �IIIIIIIIIII■IIIIIIII � IIIIIIIIIII■IIIIIII � � IIIIIIIIIII■IIIII�I � � : �IIIIIIIIIII■IIIIIII� � ��������������������� �IIIIIIIIIII�IIIII,I� I�I IIIIIIIIIII■IIIII,I I �I IIIIIIIIIII■IIIIIII I �I I1111119111■IIIII�I I �I IIIIIIIIIII■11111�19 �I IIIIIIIIIII■IIIII�I I : �IIIIIIIIIIII■IIIII�II � ��m"o��i0��o■io��o�i0 • ��I''II�I�1I�■I��1�,I� �� I11II�I�1I�■I��1�,I � �� IIIII�I�II�■I��I�1I � �� I11II�I�1I�■I����,I � �� IIIII�I�1I�■I��1�1I � �� I''II�I�1I�■I��1I,I � �� I11II�I�1I��I��1�,I � �� ������I����■I����,I � �� I11II�I�1I�■I��1�,I � � �����I�I��I�III�I�I IIIIIIIIIIII� '�'c � E oa 00 LABOR CATEGORY *RATE ($/HOUR) Minimum Maximum Project Director 220 268 Sr. Project Manager 200 249 Project Manager/Task Leader 170 215 Sr. Engineer 150 185 Utility Coordinator 130 155 Engineer 129 155 EIT 113 137 G IS 95 120 CADD 90 115 Admin/Accounting 75 92 Sr. Environmental Planner 166 199 Environmental Planner IV 149 182 Environmental Planner III 130 159 Environmental Planner II 99 121 *Direct Rates w/ 2.92 multiplier would be reflected in the monthly invoice.