The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About(0113) ATTACHMENT PH - Water.Exhibit DL - WAT E R CITY C WORT ASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE I I EXHIBIT D: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - WATER (2022 - 2041) REESE PREPARED BY: rmill NICHOLS FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 801 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 2800 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 817-735-7300 WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE EXHIBIT D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN -WATER (2022 - 2041) Prepared for: Fort Worth Water FORTWORTH. m� %""600"'o July 22, 2021 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817-735-7300 WATER & WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE Prepared for: �E O\T111 Fort Worth Water F 7/22/2021 _moo cos joo°000000000000000000000 0 JESSICA L. BROWN o0 0000000000000000000000 00 / 90098 _ E ##44 S' DENS ' \ — S � �000000o G 1%/ A FRE E AND MCHOLS, INC. XAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 E OF T 11 ��P�,.•• •••. F+ys�i /22/2021 ANDREW S.FRANKO ..................... 0�'• 115651 1�,� •.,. ENS G��_ S i411�� \A040 L FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 '0 F ..... TF�1s�7/22/2021 ............... ....... .............:I MAZEN H. KAWASMI � 0•. � o: _ FS •. ENS..• 04 FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817-735-7300 FTW 20118 OF • TF-�y��/ 7/22/2021 ;/ NICHOLAS JAMES McCORMICK o 00/ '••••135767•••,•��, .� /�,�•../C ENS G S 11 S/ONAl- E�� FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. TEXAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-2144 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH. Ord III <NICHQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water '*40JW*" TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 Existing Water Distribution System..............................................................................................2-1 2.1 Raw Water Sources and Transmission...................................................................................2-1 2.2 Water Treatment Plants, Pump Stations and Storage...........................................................2-2 3.0 Projected Water Demands............................................................................................................3-1 4.0 Water Capital Improvements.......................................................................................................4-1 5.0 Impact Fee Analysis.......................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Service Units...........................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Calculation.........................................................................5-4 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Water Supply Allocated to Fort Worth............................................................................2-1 Table 2-2 Raw Water Supply Facilities.............................................................................................2-2 Table 2-3 Water Treatment Plant Facilities.....................................................................................2-2 Table 3-1 Projected Water Demands...............................................................................................3-1 Table 4-1 Proposed Water CIP Projects...........................................................................................4-2 Table 5-1 2022-2031 Impact Fee Eligible Costs...............................................................................5-1 Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors..................................................................................5-2 Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter ....5-2 Table 5-4 Water Impact Fee with Credit Analysis (100%)...............................................................5-4 Table 5-5 Water Impact Fees by Meter Size....................................................................................5-4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure D-1 Existing Water Facilities...................................................................................................4-3 Figure D-2 Proposed Water Improvements......................................................................................4-4 APPENDICES Appendix A— Existing Water Pumping Capacities Appendix B — Existing Distribution System Storage Appendix C —Water CIP Projects Appendix D — Impact Fee Credit Analysis Appendix E — Water Meter Summary Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc., to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. This report establishes the engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous study completed in 2017. Impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost associated with expanding the municipal water system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of Fort Worth owns and operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, pumping stations, storage facilities, and pipelines that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the water system is known as the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP was updated as a part of this study with capital projects and costs provided by previously commissioned master planning documents and input from Fort Worth Water staff. The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth water facilities are eligible to be included in the impact fee analysis. The additional facilities required to accommodate growth during the study period are summarized. 1-1 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water 2.0 EXISTING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 2.1 RAW WATER SOURCES AND TRANSMISSION The City obtains the majority of its raw water supply from the Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD), with the balance supplied by the City's permitted capacity at Lake Worth, the Corps of Engineers (COE) permitted capacity at Lake Benbrook, and several small reuse projects. The City's supply from TRWD is per a long term contract, with no contractual limits on the water withdrawn from the Richland -Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs, subject to the TRWD permit limits. The current water supplies for the City are as follows in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Water Supply Allocated to Fort Worth Source West Fork HolderWater Right TRWD Permitted Contracted Amount 142.37 Lake Worth (Fort Worth Permit) Fort Worth 11.85* Lake Benbrook (COE Contract) Fort Worth 0.65 Richland -Chambers Reservoir TRWD 182.87 Cedar Creek Reservoir TRWD 153.88 *Fort Worth has allowed this water right to be used as part ofTRWD's West Fork System. Through a series of pump stations, the TRWD has implemented improvements to allow water from the Richland -Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs to flow to Lake Benbrook. The blended water can then be pumped to the Rolling Hills Water Treatment Plant (RHWTP), North Holly Water Treatment Plant (NHWTP)/South Holly Water Treatment Plant (SHWTP), or Westside Water Treatment Plant (WSWTP). TRWD implemented improvements to tie Lake Benbrook to Eagle Mountain Lake, where Fort Worth operates the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant (EMWTP). The existing raw water supply facilities are shown in Table 2-2. 2-1 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water Table 2-2 Raw Water Supply Facilities Eagle Mountain Lake OperatedFacility TRWD Capacity 66 Eagle Mountain Pump Station and Pipeline TRWD 105* Lake Worth Intake and Pipeline Fort Worth 127 Clear Fork Pump Station Fort Worth 90* Cedar Creek System TRWD 136* Richland -Chambers System TRWD 118* *Indicates firm capacity with the largest pump out of service 2.2 WATER TREATMENT PLANTS, PUMP STATIONS AND STORAGE The City's distribution system consists of eleven pressure planes. The pressure planes include the Holly, Eastside II (ES II), Northside II (NS II), Northside III (NS III), Northside IV (NS IV), Southside II (SS II), Southside III (SS III), Southside IV (SS IV), Westside II (WS II), Westside III (WS III), Westside IV (WS IV) and Westside V (WS V) Pressure Planes. Some pressure planes, such as Holly and ES II, are supplied principally by pump stations at the water treatment plants. The City currently operates five water treatment plants, summarized in Table 2-3. These plants take raw water from the TRWD reservoirs and treat it, which is then pumped into the distribution system through the high service pump stations at each treatment plant. Table 2-3 Water Treatment Plant Facilities Water Treatment Plant North Holly Plant Treatment Capacity , 80 South Holly Plant 80 Rolling Hills Plant 200 Eagle Mountain Plant 108 Westside Plant 15 In order to provide adequate pressure to each of the City's eleven pressure planes, the City operates a series of 7 high service pump stations (at the Water Treatment Plants) and twenty-two distribution system pump stations for a total of twenty-nine pumping facilities. A summary of the existing system pumping capacities of each high service pump station as well as the in -system pump stations can be found in Appendix A. These pump stations are used to fill the twenty-nine ground and elevated storage tanks located throughout the City. A summary of the existing system storage capacities of the ground and elevated storage tanks can be found in Appendix B. 2-2 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water 3.0 PROJECTED WATER DEMANDS Water demand design criteria were developed for the City of Fort Worth in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Based on historical usage, specific residential and non-residential per capita were developed for each pressure plane. FNI applied the water demand design criteria to Fort Worth population and employment projections to develop projected water demands, excluding wholesale customers, resulting in a City 2022 average day demand of 185.97 MGD, and a City 2031 average day demand of 231.80 MGD. An average day to maximum day peaking factor was also developed for each pressure plane, resulting in a City 2022 maximum day demand of 354.31 MGD and a City 2031 maximum day demand of 444.06 MGD. The wholesale customer demand was provided by the wholesale customers as part of the wholesale customer surveys. The 2022 average day demand for wholesale customers is 73.64 MGD, and the 2031 average day demand for the wholesale customers is 84.41 MGD. The 2022 maximum day demand for wholesale customers is 163.36 MGD, and the 2031 maximum day demand for the wholesale customers is 183.08 MGD. The total 2022 average day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 259.61 MGD (2022 maximum day demand of 517.67). The total 2031 average day demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 316.21 MGD (2031 maximum day demand of 627.14). The 2017 Water Master Plan Update recommended a maximum day to peak hour peaking factor of 1.5, resulting in a total 2022 peak hour demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers of 776.51 MGD, and a total 2031 peak hour demand for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers of 940.71 MGD. Table 3-1 summarizes the projected water demands for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers. Table 3-1 Proiected Water Demands City of Fort Worth 2022 185.97 354.31 531.47 2031 231.80 444.06 666.09 Wholesale Customers 2022 73.64 163.36 245.04 (Portion Served by Fort Worth) 1 2031 1 84.41 1 183.08 1 274.62 3-1 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water 4.0 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS This section establishes the water facilities and engineering studies that are eligible for inclusion in the calculation of the impact fee. Projects included in the CIP are designated to increase system capacity as a result of projected growth. Only those projects warranted by capacity needs derived from growth occurring during the study period (2022-2031) can be included in the impact fee calculation. Additionally, projects are excluded from the impact fee calculation if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in place. Projects included in the impact fee study are TRWD supply projects, City of Fort Worth raw water supply and transmission facilities, water treatment facilities, regional transmission lines, pump stations, storage facilities, and engineering studies. Table 4-1 provides a summary of each water CIP project cost and allocation for the 2022-2031 study period. The 2022 percent utilization is the portion of a project's capacity required to serve existing development. It is not included in the impact fee cost calculations. The 2022-2031 percent utilization is the portion of the project's capacity that will be required to serve development projected to occur from 2022 to 2031. The portion of a project's total cost that is used to serve development projected to occur from 2022 through 2031 is calculated as the total cost multiplied by the 2022-2031 percent utilization. Only this portion of the cost is used in the impact fee analysis. The percent utilization beyond 2031 is the portion of a project's capacity allocated to development projected to occur after 2031. Figures D-1 and D-2 show existing and proposed facilities, respectively, for the impact fee study period. Appendix C describes each water CIP project for the 2022-2031 planning period. A project description, the purpose of each project, and the portion of each project that is allocated to associated growth are included. 4-1 FREESE r-7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH Table 4-1 Water Capital Improvement Projects 2022 - 2031 Start Completion Added xisting 2022 Existing 2022 2022-2031 2031 Impact Fees Fee Costs' Impact Fees after Impact Fees after ifAllocatedto CostAllocatedto %Allocatedto Cost Allocated to 2022F Inflation Adjusted Impact % Allocated to Cost Allocated to Project ID Project Title Project Phase Initial Project Cost Project Cost in 2020 Dollars' Date Date Capacity Capacity Capacity Impact Fees (2020 ('Start Date' Dollars) 2031 2031 TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT (TRWD) PROJECTS Richland -Chambers Wetlands Const $61,000,000 $61,000,000 1999 2013 89.6 MGD 68% $41,480,000 32% $19,520,000 $19,520,000 0% $0 Eagle Mountain Connection Raw Water Line & Pump Station Const $138,867,058 $138,867,058 2006 2008 47 MGD 46% $63,878,847 11% $15,275,376 $15,275,376 43% $59,712,835 Integrated Pipeline & Pump Stations Const $1,076,947,000 $1,076,947,000 2009 2022 160 MGD 0% $0 • PROJECTS 37% 1 $398,470,390 $398,470,390 63% $678,476,610 ELIGIBLE COST RAW WATER SUPPLY AND TREATMENT PLANTS W3-58 (2005 MP) Westside WTP - Phase 1 (0-12 MGD) Eng $4,992,954 $4,992,954 2009 2009 - 34% $1,711,870 26% $1,283,902 $1,283,902 40% $1,997,182 W3-5B (2005 MP) Westside WTP - Phase 1 (0-12 MGD) Const $46,847,759 $46,847,759 2009 2012 12 MGD 34% $16,062,089 26% $12,046,567 $12,046,567 40% $18,739,104 N2-5A (2005 MP) Eagle Mountain Clearwell #3 Eng & Const $2,968,644 $2,968,644 2011 2014 2.5 MG 53% $1,582,287 47% $1,386,357 $1,386,357 0% $0 W3-8 (2017 MP)2 Westside WTP Expansion 12 MGD to 15 MGD - Membrane Rack Const $500,000 $500,000 2016 2017 3 MGD 74% $371,500 26% $128,500 $128,500 0% $0 W3-8 (2017 MP)2 Westside WTP Expansion 15 MGD to 18 MGD - Membrane Rack Const $1,200,000 $1,200,000 2020 2021 3 MGD 22% $267,600 78% $932,400 $932,400 0% $0 W3-8 (2017 MP)2 Westside WTP Expansion 18 MGD to 21 MGD - Membrane Rack Eng & Const $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2023 2024 3 MGD 0% $0 94% $1,880,000 $2,054,327 6% $120,000 N2-7 (2017 MP)2 Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD Eng $6,000,000 $6,000,000 2024 2025 0% $0 42% $2,546,000 $2,865,545 58% $3,454,000 N2-7 (2017 MP)2 Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD CM $3,500,000 $3,500,000 2026 2027 0% $0 420 $1,485,167 $1,773,367 58% $2,014,833 N2-7 (2017 MP)2 Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD Const $50,000,000 $50,000,000 2026 2027 30 MGD 0% $0 42% $21,216,667 $25,333,810 58% $28,783,333 N2-206 (2005 MP) Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water PS from 35 MGD to 70 MGD Eng $480,000 $529,336 2026 2027 0% $0 42% $223,909 $267,359 58% $305,427 N2-201 (2005 MP) Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water PS from 35 MGD to 70 MGD Const $4,800,000 $5,293,360 $123,832,053 2027 2029 35 MGD RAW WATER SUPPLY 0% • WATER $0 TREATMENT PLANT 42% ELIGIBLE COST, $2,239,091 $2,753,800 $50,825,934 58% $3,054,269 PUMP STATIONS AND REGIONAL TRANSMISSION LINES 52-3 (2005 MP) McCart Pump Station Expansion to 35 MGD Total Capacity Eng & Const $563,375 $563,375 2013 2013 10 MGD 85% $480,417 15% $82,958 $82,958 0% $0 W5-1(2005 MP) 3.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station at Walsh Ranch Tank Eng $173,000 $173,000 2015 2016 56% $96,303 44% $76,697 $76,697 0% $0 W5-1 (2005 MP) 3.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station at Walsh Ranch Tank Const $1,729,685 $1,729,685 2016 2017 3 MGD 56% $962,858 44% $766,827 $766,827 0% $0 N2-1 (2005 MP) Northside 1148-Inch Transmission Line Eng & Const $38,334,816 $38,334,816 2016 2020 48 MGD 10% $3,680,142 39% $15,103,918 $15,103,918 51% $19,550,756 N2-1 (2017 MP) Expansion of the Northside Pump Station to 70 MGD Total Capacity Eng & Const $1,294,391 $1,396,051 2022 2024 12 MGD 0% $0 100% $1,396,051 $1,481,071 0% $0 W4-5 (2005 MP)3 8.0 MGD Southside IV Pump Station Eng $120,000 $416,508 2021 2021 0% $0 55% $226,997 $233,807 46% $189,511 W4-5 (2005 MP)3 8.0 MGD Southside IV Pump Station Const $1,200,000 $3,832,000 2023 2024 8 MGD 0% $0 55% $2,088,440 $2,282,095 46% $1,743,560 W4-4 (2017 MP) 5.0 MGD Westside IV Pump Station Eng $252,000 $271,792 2021 2023 0% $0 1 26% $70,188 $72,294 74% $201,604 W4-4 (2017 MP) 5.0 MGD Westside IV Pump Station Const $2,100,000 $2,264,931 2023 2025 5 MGD 0% $0 26% $584,900 $639,136 74% $1,680,031 W5-8 (2017 MP) 5.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station Eng $252,000 $271,792 2021 2023 0% $0 47% $128,761 $132,624 53% $143,030 W5-8 (2017 MP) 5.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station Const $2,100,000 $2,264,931 2023 2025 5 MGD 0% $0 47% $1,073,011 $1,172,508 53% $1,191,920 53-7 (2017 MP) McCart Pump Station Expansion to 45 MGD Total Capacity Eng $432,000 $465,929 2027 2029 0% $0 33% $152,359 $187,382 67% $313,570 53-7 (2017 MP) McCart Pump Station Expansion to 45 MGD Total Capacity Const $3,600,000 $3,882,739 2027 2029 10 MGD 0% $0 33% $1,269,656 $1,561,517 67% $2,613,083 53-11(2017 MP) Alta Mesa Pump Station Expansion to 49.4 MGD Total Capacity Eng 1 $432,000 1 $465,929 1 2027 1 2029 1 - 0% $0 33% 1 $152,359 1 $187,382 67% 1 $313,570 53-11 (2017 MP) JAIta Mesa Pump Station Expansion to 49.4 MGD Total Capacity Const $3,600,000 $3,882,739 2027 2029 10 MGD 0% $0 33% IV: $1,269,656 $1,561,517 67% $2,613,083 STORAGE TANKS N2-7/N3-5 (2005 MP)* Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Tank & Pump Station Eng & Const $4,284,791 $4,284,791 2006 2008 5 MG 78% $3,342,137 22% $942,654 $942,654 0% $0 N4-2 (2005 MP) 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank on Hwy. 287 Eng $672,115 $672,115 2014 2015 19% $127,702 81% $544,413 $544,413 0% $0 N4-2 (2005 MP) 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank on Hwy. 287 & Land Purchase Const & Land $4,068,060 $4,068,060 2014 2015 1 MG 19% $772,931 81% $3,295,129 $3,295,129 0% $0 N2-10 (2005 MP) 5.0 MG Northside 11 Ground Storage Tank at the Caylor Tank Site Eng $601,729 $601,729 2014 2015 40% $239,122 50% $300,865 $300,865 10% $61,743 N2-10 (2005 MP) 5.0 MG Northside 11 Ground Storage Tank at the Caylor Tank Site Const $4,879,440 $4,879,440 2015 2016 5 MG 40% $1,939,047 50% $2,439,720 $2,439,720 10% $500,673 W5-2 (2017 MP)2 1.0 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank on Beggs Ranch Eng $575,000 $575,000 2016 2019 5% $28,750 14% $80,500 $80,500 81% $465,750 W5-2 (2017 MP)2 1.0 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank on Beggs Ranch Const $3,000,000 $3,000,000 2019 2020 1 MG 5% $150,000 1 14% $420,000 $420,000 81% $2,430,000 W4-5 (2005 MP)' 0.03 MG Southside IV Hydropneumatic Tank Eng $103,910 $103,910 2021 2022 - 0% $0 100% $103,910 $107,027 0% $0 W4-5 (2005 MP)' 0.03 MG Southside IV Hydropneumatic Tank Const $956,000 $956,000 2021 2022 0.03 MG 0% $0 100% $956,000 $984,680 0% $0 W3-3 (2017 MP)' 2.5 MG Westside III Ground Storage Tank South of IH-20 Eng $180,000 $450,000 2021 2023 - 0% $0 59% $264,600 $272,538 41% $185,400 W3-3 (2017 MP)3 2.5 MG Westside III Ground Storage Tank South of IH-20 Const $1,680,000 $3,000,000 2023 2025 2.5 MG 0% $0 59% $1,764,000 $1,927,570 41% $1,236,000 W4-10 (2005 MP)' 1.0 MG Westside IV Elevated Storage Tank Eng $234,000 $540,000 2022 2023 1 - 0% $0 43% $232,200 $246,341 57% $307,800 W4-10 (2005 MP)' 1.0 MG Westside IV Elevated Storage Tank Const $2,340,000 $3,600,000 2023 2024 1 MG 0% $0 43% $1,548,000 $1,691,541 57% $2,052,000 N3-7 (2017 MP)' 2.0 MG Northside III Elevated Storage Tank Eng $432,000 $1,080,000 2024 2024 0% $0 100% $1,080,000 $1,215,550 0% $0 N3-7 (2017 MP)' 2.0 MG Northside III Elevated Storage Tank Const $4,032,000 $7,200,000 2025 2026 2 MG 0% $0 100% $7,200,000 $8,346,773 0% $0 53-10 (2017 MP)' 1.0 MG Southside III Elevated Storage Tank off Crowley Plover Road Eng $315,700 $540,000 2025 2027 0% $0 70% $378,000 $438,206 30% $162,000 53-10 (2017 MP)3 1.0 MG Southside III Elevated Storage Tank off Crowley Plover Road Const $2,630,400 $3,600,000 2025 2027 1 MG 0% $0 70% $2,520,000 $2,921,371 30% $1,080,000 53-7 (2017 MP)' 5.0 MG Southside 11 Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station Eng $900,000 $900,000 2027 2029 1 - 0% $0 23% $209,700 $257,905 77% $690,300 53-7 (2017 MP)3 5.0 MG Southside II Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station Const $6,000,000 $6,000,000 2027 2029 5 MG 0% $0 23% $1,398,000 $1,719,364 77% $4,602,000 N4-5 (2017 MP)3 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank Eng $288,000 $540,000 2027 2029 0% $0 8% $43,200 $53,131 92% $496,800 N4-5 (2017 MP)' 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank Const $2,688,000 $3,600,000 2027 2029 1 MG 0% $0 8% $288,000 $354,204 92% $3,312,000 W5-5 (2017 MP)' 0.5 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank Eng $216,000 $270,000 2027 2029 0% $0 14% $37,800 $46,489 86% $232,200 W5-5 (2017 MP)' 10.5 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank Const $1,800,000 $1,800,000 2027 2029 0.5 MG 0% $0 STORAGE 14% $252,000 $309,928 1 86% $1,548,000 ENGINEERING STUDIES - 2005 Water Master Plan (2005-2025) Study $1,360,386 $1,360,386 2003 2005 - 85% $1,156,328 15% $204,058 $204,058 0% $0 2017 Water Master Plan (2013-2033) Study $768,168 $768,168 1 2013 2016 45% $345,676 50% $384,084 $384,084 1 5% 1 $38,408 Impact Fee Study (2022-2031) Study $150,000 $150,000 1 2019 2021 0% $0 100% $150,000 $150,000 1 0% 1 $0 $2,278,554 ENGINEERING STUDIES ELIGIBLE COST $738,142 $738,142 m�15,401,926m 111=474 1ENR factor of 7.9% used to inflate projected cost from 2017 WMP to 2020 dollars and an inflation rate of 3%/year was assumed on proposed projects only. 2Revised project costs for 2020 provided by City Staff. 3Revised project costs due to deviations from 2017 WMP CIP. *City of Fort Worth cost participation. Information Sources: • 2005 Water System Master Plan, Freese & Nichols • Semiannual CIP Progress Report, City of Fort Worth • 2017 Water System Master Plan, Freese & Nichols • City of Fort Worth staff • 5-year CIP Budget 2021- 2025, City of Fort Worth • Tarrant Regional Water District staff Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc. Job No.: FTW20118 Location: HAW _W W_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL_REPOR7\Exhibit D Water CIP\(Figure_D1)-Existing_ Water_ Facilities(11x17).mxd Wise County _ k� a \ Lago Vista PS II \ r I 199 1 I I I 411 Parkes I \� Eagle Mountain WTP\ l I County] Jenkins Heights PS - I- Westsi�de,V\EST c\ X� Westland GST and PS Westside WTP �'� WTP = J �,s Stagecoach GST and PS PS e�S 580 Walsh Ranch GST, r Standpipe, and PS _ 1 I � I i \ r i FIGURE D- I CITY OF FORT WORTH EXISTING WATER SYSTEM FACILITIES LEGEND M Pump Station Impact Fee Water ® Ground Storage Service Area Denton 0 Tank r J Fort Worth City Limit County -` Elevated Storage Fort Worth Tank CJ ETJ Boundary 'r ®Water Treatment Water Wholesale Plant Customer �- Road Non -Wholesale 1F-I Lake Customer ® `--- County Boundary FORT WORTH® 114 r ~ FREESE CM11101NICHOLS —i i\ `Bradley EST Lake Holly WTP -N, Holly WTP Calmont EST \ F 377 Eastside IF\r Como GSTs and �PS e 0LL dwl a d Ranch 183 Southside GST and PS Seminary Hill EST Russom Ranch PS Sun Country I I 377 t �- 171 Johnson County 6 1 0 18,000 171 SCALE IN FEET 0 Mesa GST and ® 4 GST and PS.'_ j 1" Na , North Beach GST and PS Meadowbrook ES' Eastwood EST Rolling Hills WTP r_7�VT 4.1 and PS Fleetwood GST Created By Freese and Nichols, Inc. Job No.: FTW20118 Location: HAW _W W_PLANNING\01_DELIVERABLES\00_FINAL_REPORTExhibit D Water CIP\(Figure_D2)-Water_ Proposed _ Facilities_CIP(11x17).mxd Updated: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 User: 02499 Integrated Pipeline & Pump Stations Richland -Chambers F Wetlands h LL 0 Wise County FM FM 2048A," FM 2048 3 ------- --------- Briar y KNOB HILL m 'a n �pri gtown 2� o Parker L^ , ��LL Sijn ua County, Mg7Hl Azle 199 1 I I l � I i eJ i f �, =M 1886 FM I' I I T 3 I Z m WS-V -1.0 MG EST W5-2 (2017 MP) rI 1 + r I I_ 'WILLOW \ �I PARK Walsh Ranch LL WS-V PSG{ \ .... F W5-1'(2005111 "111711! I FM 2264 FM 2264 New FM I Proposed NS-III - 2.0 MG EST ,�,N3-7 (2017,111 _..so Proposed NS-IV =,1.0 MG EST N4-5 (2017 MP) New- R ah (! Pecan rAcres C a NS-IV -1.0 MG ESTj N4-2 (2005 1il Ile Mo) Lake ENGINEERING STUDIES 2005 Water Master Plan 2005-202 2017 Water Master Plan 2013-203 Impact Fee Study 2022-2031 Denton County f� FM 407 I�FM 407 iendera Ranch �GST_8r PS 05 111 (2005 MP)1� J J_ ncti iTransmission Line N2A (2005 MP) ",� `'T os 4 .Eagle Mountain,WTP Proposed Improvements- s N2--5 (2005 MP), N2-7 (2017 MF y�s9f Eagle Mountain RWPS elide Proposed Improvements 5 N2-20B (2005 MP) Northside PS \ . Proposed Improvements N2-1 (2017 MP) 183 199 1 — - RIVER �•O+AKS Westside WTP WESTWORTH \Proposed Improvements VILLAGE W3S13 (2005 MP), W3-8 (2017 MP)\,A,CcTn�iao L�O}� NorFWS!'IVIWS-V roposed r F PS I Proposed � M:4 (2017 MP), W5-8 (2017 MP)`. al u qLE WS-III 2.5 MG GST W3-3 (2017 MP)� .0 I FM5 Proposed WS-V 0.5 MG EST BENBROOK W5-5 (2017 MP) Proposed 2r� WS-IVt1.0 MG EST 4 1 BenbrOG j Proposed "SS -IV PS W4-5 (2005 MP) 1 I d Propo es SS -IV 0.03 MG HP Tank \ W4-5 (2005 MP) 377 r TO 1 M LL Cress, ti M t LL 1 s, Johnson 9�. Fy�c M County FM 917 FM 917 FM 917 God/e, 0 18,000 L.y9 CT SCAL-E_'IN FEET 171 1 5 3 FIGURE D-2 CITY OF FORT WORTH 2022 WATER IMPACT FEE STUDY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND Proposed Pump Station ■ Existing Proposed Water Treatment Plant Ground StorageTank Existing Water Line Proposed TRWD Pump Station Elevated StorageTank Proposed TRWD Raw Water Line Hydropneumatic Tank �— Road \\ Impact Fee Water ® Service Area Lake _ Dr ® Existing Pump Station --J Fort Worth City Limit Existing Ground Fort Worth 4KE C� Storage Tank ETJ Boundary Existing Elevated Storage Tank Water Wholesale Customer Non -Wholesale Customer FORT WORTH - o �---� County Boundary �7FREESE ti <NICHOLS I« _5.0 MG-GST N 180 1 Eagle, Mountain Connection Raw Water. Line`& Pump Station FOREST' arran 1 HILL County r � _ � Alta Mesa Pb,, _ KENNEDALE EDEN EVEo Proposed Improvements I _RM_AN- 'S3-11'(2017 III 287F HARRIS � \� 287 ``' 917 \' McCart GST. and PS N Proposed Improvements S2-3 (2005 MP); S3-7,(2017 MF WI PropII I:0-MG -10 (2017 I 114 F�2 EDFv1 3 e IF 287 T Ellis Count 1 c1 �o Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water 5.0 IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS Table 5-1 summarizes the impact fee eligible costs for projects from Table 4-1. The calculated cumulative interest includes the following assumptions: • Existing impact fee eligible CIP o Based on the actual interest for the already outstanding debt for the full term of the bond issuance. • Future impact fee eligible CIP o Based on the projects start date. o Utilizing a bond issuance cost of 2.0%. o Utilizing an interest rate of 4.0%. o Utilizing a Fort Worth bond term of 30 years. A more detailed explanation of the cumulative interest is included in the impact fee credit analysis, which can be found in Appendix D. Table 5-1 2022-2031 Impact Fee Eligible Costs CIP Category TRWD Projects ImpactTotal Growth to 2022-2031 Related Cost $1,276,814,058 34% Growth $433,265,766 Raw Water Supply/Treatment Plants $123,832,053 41% $50,825,934 Transmission Lines/Pump Stations $60,216,216 42% $25,541,733 Storage Tanks $52,261,045 55% $28,915,899 Engineering Studies $2,278,554 32% $738,142 ELIGIBLE IMPACT FEE CIP SUBTOTAL (INFLATION ADJUSTED) $539,287,474 Cumulative Interest - Fort Worth $34,790,933 Cumulative Interest - TRWD $103,185,997 TOTAL• ., , 0, 5.1 SERVICE UNITS Costs between various customer types and sizes are allocated through the application of equivalent meters. Since the 5/8" x 3/4" water meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential customer, a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8" x 3/4" meter capacity. Table 5-2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the American Water Works Association (AWWA) M6 Manual Standard C700, Cold -Water Meters — Displacement Type and AWWA Standard C701, Cold -Water Meters — Turbine Types I and II for Customer Service. 5-1 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water Table 5-2 AWWA Meter Equivalency Factors Meter Size 5/8" x 3/4" Equivalency Factor Appendix E contains the current number of water meters for residential and non-residential customers by meter size for the City of Fort Worth, as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this information to FNI. The number of equivalent meters was also calculated for the City and wholesale customers. The next calculation step determines factors for population per residential meter and employment per non-residential meter. Table 5-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and wholesale customers using 2020 information. Table 5-3 Development of Factors of 2020 Population and Emolovment by Eauivalent Meter Non - Description Residential Residential City of Fort Worth Number of Equivalent Meters 332,846 127,592 Population / Employment 873,130 589,052 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.62 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 4.62 Wholesale Customers Number of Equivalent Meters 170,512 61,725 Population / Employment 406,953 230,335 Population per Equivalent Meter 2.39 -- Employment per Equivalent Meter -- 3.73 FNI did not receive meter count information from two of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers; however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The 5-2 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per equivalent meter in Table 5-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all its wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent meter, FNI divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or employment served by Fort Worth. The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2022 and 2031 uses the ratios in Table 5-3 and the population and employment projections for 2022 and 2031 in Exhibit A- Water Land Use Assumptions Report. The calculation is shown below: City of Fort Worth Increase in Equivalent Meters Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter _ (1,133,678 — 911,970) / 2.62 = 84,621 Service Units Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter _ (704,041— 615,009) / 4.62 = 19,271 Service Units Fort Worth Total = Residential + Non -Residential = 84,621 + 19,271 = 103,892 Service Units Wholesale Customers Increase in Equivalent Meters Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter _ (489,325 — 423,632) / 2.39 = 27,487 Service Units Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter _ (255,528 — 235,555) / 3.73 = 5,355 Service Units Wholesale Total = Residential + Non -Residential = 27,487 + 5,355 = 32,842 Service Units Grand Total = Fort Worth Total + Wholesale Total = 103,892 + 32,842 = 136,734 Service Units 5-3 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water 5.2 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of eligible CIP for the study period from Table 5-1 divided by the increase in equivalent meters from Section 5.1. This fee equals the water impact fee per service unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size. Water Impact Fee per Service Unit = Max Infrastructure Cost / Increase in Equivalent Meters = $677,264,404 / 136,734 = $4,953 per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter The maximum allowable impact fee that can be collected is calculated by subtracting a credit from the impact fee eligible cost. A detailed impact fee credit analysis is included in Appendix D. A summary of the maximum allowable water impact fee including the credit analysis is shown in Table 5-4. Table 5-4 Water Impact Fee with Credit Analysis The water impact fees for meters other than 5/8" x 3/4" are the product of the fee per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 5-2. The maximum allowable water impact fees are provided in Table 5-5. Table 5-5 Water Impact Fees by Meter Size Meter Size 5/8" x 3/4" Equivalency Factor Calculated Impact Fee per Service Unit (Before Subtracting Credit) Maximum Allowable Impact Fee (After Subtracting Credit) $1,040,130.00 5-4 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water Appendix A Existing Water Pumping Facilities APPENDIX A Existing Water Pumping Capacities North Holly Plant: Four 27.0 MGD and two 15.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 138.0 MGD. The total measured capacity of the pump station is 90.0 MGD due to piping restrictions. South Holly Plant: Four 30.0 MGD and one 15.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 135.0 MGD. Rolling Hills Plant: HSPS #1: Seven 30.0 MGD, one 22.0 MGD, one 17.0 MGD, and one 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 259.0 MGD. HSPS #2: Two vertical turbines 30.0 MGD and two 20.0 MGD vertical turbines. Total pumping capacity of 100.0 MGD. Eagle Mountain Plant: HSPS #1: Four 21.7 MGD, two 15.0 MGD, three 3.6 MGD, and two 8.6 MGD. Total pumping capacity of 144.8 HSPS #2: Three 22.0 MGD and two 3.0 MGD. Total pumping capacity of 72.0 MGD. Westside Plant: Two 9.8 MGD and two 6.3 MGD vertical turbines. Total Pumping Capacity of 32.2 MGD. Southside I1 Pressure Plane: Edwards Ranch Station: Two 16.0 MGD and one 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 5.0 MGD emergency generator pump. Total pumping capacity of 47.0 MGD. South Side Reservoir Station: Two 5.7 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 11.4 MGD. Southside III Pressure Plane: Russom Ranch Station: One 6.0 MGD and one 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 10.0 MGD electric and gas unit. Total pumping capacity of 21.0 MGD. Alta Mesa Station: Two 10.0 MGD, one 9.4 MGD, and one 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 5.0 MGD emergency generator pump. Total pumping capacity of 39.4 MGD. McCort Station: Two 10.5 MGD, one 10.0 MGD, and one 4.6 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 35.6 MGD. A-1 Northside I1 Pressure Plane: Old Northside Station: Two 5.7 MGD and one 3.4 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, and one 4.5 MGD gas driven unit. Total pumping capacity of 19.3 MGD. Cantrell-Sansom Station: One 5.0 MGD, one 3.0 MGD, and one 2.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 10.0 MGD. North Beach Station: One 2.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal unit. Total pumping capacity of 2.0 MGD. New Northside Station: Two 18.3 MGD, two 12.9 MGD, and one 11.9 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 74.3 MGD. Northside III Pressure Plane: Jenkins Heiahts Station: One 2.0 MGD, one 3.9 MGD and one 3.4 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 9.3 MGD. North Beach Station: Two 4.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 8.0 MGD. Sendera Ranch Station: One 5.8 MGD and three 10.1 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity 36.1 MGD. Northside IV Pressure Plane: Logo Vista Station: Two 0.25 MGD and two 0.5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 1.5 MGD. Sendera Ranch Station: Three 10.1 MGD and one 5.8 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Totally pumping capacity of 36.1 MGD. Westside II Pressure Plane: Westside Station: One 12.0 MGD, one 6.3 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, and one 7.0 MGD gas driven standby unit. Total pumping capacity of 35.3 MGD. Como Station: Three 15.0 MGD, one 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, and one 5.8 MGD emergency generator. Total pumping capacity of 60.8 MGD. Westside III Pressure Plane: Stagecoach Road Station: Two 8.0 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units, as well as one 5.0 MGD emergency generator. Total pumping capacity of 31.0 MGD. A-2 Westside IV Pressure Plane: Westland Pump Station: Two 3.0 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 16.0 MGD. Westside V Pressure Plane: Walsh Ranch Pump Station: Two 1.5 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 3.0 MGD. Eastside II Pressure Plane: Eastside Station: One 22.0 MGD, one 17.0 MGD and three 10.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units and one 7 MGD Gas -driven standby unit. Total pumping capacity of 76.0 MGD. Randol Mill Station: One 10.0 MGD and two 5.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 20.0 MGD. Fleetwood Station: One 3.0 MGD and three 2.0 MGD electrically driven centrifugal units. Total pumping capacity of 9.0 MGD. A-3 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water Appendix B Existing Distribution System Storage APPENDIX B Existing Distribution System Storage Eastside Pressure Plane II (805') CAPACITY (MG) Eastwood Elevated Tank 1.5 Timberline Elevated Tank 2.0 Meadowbrook Elevated Tank 2.0 Randol Mill Ground Reservoir 6.0 North Beach Street Ground Reservoir 5.5 Fleetwood Ground Reservoir 5.5 Eastside Pressure Plane Total 22.5 Hollv Pressure Plane f706' Northside Ground Reservoir 4.0 Como Ground Storage Reservoir 6.0 Como Ground Storage Reservoir 2.0 Southside Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Holly Pressure Plane Total 17.0 Northside Pressure Planes: Elevation 853' Plane II Northwest Elevated Tank 1.0 Caylor Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Caylor Ground Storage Reservoir #2 5.0 Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Elevation 936' Plane III Lake Country Elevated Tank 0.5 Elevation 950' Plane III Bradley Elevated Tank 2.0 Willow Springs Elevated Tank 2.0 Elevation 1040' Plane IV Crumb Elevated Tank 1.0 Northside Pressure Plane Total 21.5 L0I Southside Pressure Planes: CAPACITY [MG) Elevation 850' Plane II Seminary Hill Elevated Tank 2.0 Alta Mesa Ground Storage Reservoir 9.2 McCart Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Elevation 990' Plane III Armstrong Ranch Elevated Tank 2.0 Sun Country Elevated Tank 2.0 Southside Pressure Plane Total 20.2 Westside Pressure Planes: Elevation 857' Plane II Calmont Elevated Tank 1.0 Stagecoach Ground Storage Reservoir 5.5 Elevation 974' Plane III Westland Ground Storage Reservoir 5.0 Elevation 1065' Plane IV Walsh Ranch Ground Storage Reservoir 2.5 Walsh Ranch Standpipe (used for pressure) 0.06 Elevation 1190' Plane V Westside V Elevated Tank on Beggs Ranch 1.0 Westside Pressure Plane Total 15.06 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM STORAGE CAPACITY: 96.26 MG Water Treatment Plants: CAPACITY [MG) Eagle Mountain WTP 10.5 Holly WTP 20.0 Rolling Hills WTP 17.2 Westside WTP 2.5 TOTAL CLEARWELL CAPACITY: 50.2 MG LN Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water Appendix C Water CIP Projects Appendix C Water CIP Projects TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PROJECTS Project Title: Richland -Chambers Wetlands Description: Construction of wetlands near Richland -Chambers Reservoir. Purpose: Provide an additional raw water supply to the Integrated Pipeline Project. Allocation: This project is allocated 32% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031), divided by the added capacity from the Richland -Chambers Wetlands project (89.6 MGD). Project Title: Eagle Mountain Connection Raw Water Line and Pump Station Description: Construction of raw water line and pump station from Benbrook Lake to Eagle Mountain Lake. Purpose: Provide additional raw water supplies to the Eagle Mountain Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and the Westside WTP. Allocation: This project is allocated 11% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the proportion need of the raw water supply from Lake Benbrook to provide supply for the Westside WTP and the Eagle Mountain WTP to serve 10-year projected growth. Project Title: Integrated Pipeline and Pump Stations Description: Construction of raw water line and pump stations from Richland -Chambers Reservoir to Benbrook Lake. Purpose: Provide an additional raw water line to provide additional raw water supplies. Allocation: This project is allocated 37% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031), approximately 62% of which will be supplied through this project (as indicated by TRWD), divided by the capacity added by the Integrated Pipeline and Pump Stations (160 MGD). C-1 Appendix C Water CIP Projects RAW WATER SUPPLY Project Title: Expand Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water PS from 35 MGD to 70 MGD (N2-20B - 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of additional pumping capacity in the Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water Pump Station. Purpose: Provide additional raw water supplies to the Eagle Mountain WTP to a capacity of 70 MGD. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 42% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand for the Northside Pressure Plane (2029-2031), divided by the added capacity of the Second Eagle Mountain Raw Water Pump Station expansion (35 MGD). C-2 Appendix C Water CIP Projects WTPS Project Title: Westside WTP — Phase 1 (0 — 12 MGD) (W3-5B — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of new 12 MGD WTP. This project includes improvements at the Westside WTP to account for an ultimate capacity of 35 MGD. Purpose: A new WTP is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 26% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands in the Westside Pressure Plane. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031), divided by the ultimate capacity of the treatment plant (35 MGD). Project Title: Eagle Mountain Clearwell #3 (N2-5A — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of the third clearwell at the Eagle Mountain WTP. Purpose: The completion of the third clearwell adds 2.5 MG of capacity as well as allows for the full 105 MGD capacity to be utilized at the WTP. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 47% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand, divided by the capacity of the clearwell (2.5 MG). Project Title: Westside WTP Expansion 12 MGD to 15 MGD — Membrane Rack (W3-8 — 2017 MP) Description: Construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP. Purpose: An expansion of the WTP capacity from 12 MGD to 15 MGD is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 26% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the projected 2031 demand in the Westside III/IV/V Pressure Planes, divided by the added capacity of the treatment plant expansion, less the allocation to existing 2022 capacity, since the capacity will be fully utilized during the planning period. C-3 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: Westside WTP Expansion 15 MGD to 18 MGD — Membrane Rack (W3-8 — 2017 MP) Description: Construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP. Purpose: An expansion of the WTP capacity from 15 MGD to 18 MGD is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 78% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the projected 2031 demand in the Westside III/IV/V Pressure Planes, divided by the added capacity of the treatment plant expansion, less the allocation to existing 2022 capacity, since the capacity will be fully utilized during the planning period. Project Title: Westside WTP Expansion 18 MGD to 21 MGD — Membrane Rack (W3-8 — 2017 MP) Description: Construction of a 3 MGD expansion of the Westside WTP. Purpose: An expansion of the WTP capacity from 18 MGD to 21 MGD is recommended to meet the demands in the northwest part of the City. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 94% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the projected 2031 demand in the Westside III/IV/V Pressure Planes, divided by the total capacity of the treatment plant expansion (21 MGD). Project Title: Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion from 110 MGD to 140 MGD (N2-7 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of Eagle Mountain WTP expansion to treat 140 MGD. Purpose: An expansion of Eagle Mountain WTP to be increased further to 140 MGD because of the growth of the City's north side and Alliance Airport, and because of the projected water demand increase. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 42% to growth in the study period, as it is required to provide capacity to meet projected water demands. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in coincidental demand (2027-2031) in the Northside Pressure Plane less the Northside II projected coincidental demand met by N2-1, divided by the capacity added from the Eagle Mountain WTP Expansion (30 MGD). C-4 Appendix C Water CIP Projects PUMP STATIONS AND REGIONAL TRANSMISSION LINES Project Title: McCart Pump Station Expansion to 35 MGD Total Capacity (52-3 — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the McCart Pump Station with an expanded capacity from 25 to 35 MGD. Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the Southside II Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. The additional 10 MGD pump station capacity increases the total pump station capacity by 40% to meet future water system demands. Allocation: This project is allocated 15% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined assuming the remaining capacity is projected to be fully utilized in the planning period. Project Title: 3.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station at Walsh Ranch Tank (W5-1— 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a new Westside V Pump Station with a capacity of 3 MGD. Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in the Westside V Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 44% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined because the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Westside V Pressure Plane was greater than remaining capacity of the pump station. The pump station will be 56% utilized in 2022, which was determined using the projected demand for 2022, divided by the added capacity from the expansion (3 MGD). Project Title: Northside II 48-inch Transmission Line (N2-1— 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 48-inch transmission line in the Northside II Pressure Plane. This project runs from Cromwell Marine Creek Road to Texas Sage Trail. Purpose: A large transmission line is necessary to address the projected new population growth in the area. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 39% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Northside II pressure plane, divided by the added capacity of the transmission line (48 MGD). C-5 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: Expansion of the Northside Pump Station to 70 MGD Total Capacity (N2-1 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the Northside Pump Station with an expanded capacity from 58 to 70 MGD. Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the Northside II Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project was allocated 100% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2024-2031) for the Northside II Pressure Plane, which is larger than the added capacity from the Northside Pump Station Expansion (12 MGD). It is assumed that the expansion will be fully utilized, and the remaining demand will be met from the Eagle Mountain WTP High Service Pump Station. Project Title: 8.0 MGD Southside IV Pump Station (W4-5 — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a new Southside IV Pump Station with a capacity of 8 MGD. Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in the Southside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project was allocated 55% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Southside IV Pressure Plane, divided by the added capacity with the addition of the pump station (8 MGD). Project Title: 5.0 MGD Westside IV Pump Station (W4-4 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a new Westside IV Pump Station with a capacity of 5 MGD. Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in the Westside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 26% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2023-2031) in the Westside IV Pressure Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity that will be provided by the pump station expansion. This value was then divided by the added capacity resulting from the pump station (5 MGD). C-6 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: 5.0 MGD Westside V Pump Station (W5-8 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a new Westside V Pump Station with a capacity of 5 MGD. Purpose: A new pump station is necessary to address the projected new population growth in the Westside V Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 47% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2023-2031) in the Westside V Pressure Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity in the Westside V Pressure Plane that will be provided by the expansion. The resulting demand was then divided by the capacity added by the pump station (5 MGD). Project Title: McCart Pump Station Expansion to 45 MGD Total Capacity (S3-7 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the McCart Pump Station with an expanded capacity from 35 to 45 MGD. Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the Southside III Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. The additional 10 MGD pump station capacity increases the total pump station capacity by approximately 29% to meet future water system demands. Allocation: This project is allocated 33% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2029-2031) in the Southside III Pressure Plane, divided by the capacity added by the pump station expansion (10 MGD). Project Title: Alta Mesa Pump Station Expansion to 49.4 MGD Total Capacity (S3-11— 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of an expansion to the Alta Mesa Pump Station with an expanded capacity from 39.4 to 49.4 MGD total capacity. Purpose: A larger pump station is necessary to provide additional pumping capacity to the Southside III Pressure Plane and redeveloping areas. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. The additional 10 MGD pump station capacity increases the total pump station capacity by approximately 29% to meet future water system demands. Allocation: This project is allocated 33% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2029-2031) in the Southside III Pressure Plane, divided by the capacity added by the pump station expansion (10 MGD). C-7 Appendix C Water CIP Projects STORAGE TANKS Project Title: Sendera Ranch Ground Storage Tank and Pump Station (N2-7/N3-5 — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 5 MG ground storage tank at the Sendera Ranch Pump Station. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 22% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand, divided by the capacity of the ground storage tank (5 MG). Project Title: 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank on Highway 287 (N4-2 — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Northside IV Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Northside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 81% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined assuming the remaining capacity is projected to be fully utilized in the planning period. The pump station will be 19% utilized in 2022, which was determined using the projected demand for 2022 in the Northside IV Pressure Plane, divided by the added capacity from the elevated tank. Project Title: 5.0 MG Northside II Ground Storage Tank at the Caylor Tank Site (N2-10 —2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a second 5.0 MG ground storage tank for the Northside II Pressure Plane. Purpose: This improvement is to provide additional storage facilities that are needed in the Northside II Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 50% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Northside II Pressure Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity in the Northside II Pressure Plane that will be provided by the pump station. This value was then divided by the added capacity resulting from storage tank (5 MG). C-8 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: 1.0 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank on Beggs Ranch (W5-2 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside V Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside V Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 14% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Westside V Pressure Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the capacity in the Westside V Pressure Plane that will be provided by the pump station. The resulting demand was then divided by the added capacity resulting from the storage tank (1 MGD). Project Title: 0.03 MG Southside IV Hydropneumatic Tank (W4-5 — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 0.03 MG hydropneumatic tank for the Southside IV Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and future water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Southside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined based on the number of connections projected in the Southside IV Pressure Plane. TCEQ Chapter 290.45 states, "If pressure tanks are used, a maximum capacity of 30,000 gallons is sufficient for systems of up to 2,500 connections." Project Title: 2.5 MG Westside III Ground Storage Tank South of IH-20 (W3-3 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 2.5 MG ground storage tank for the Westside III Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside III Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 59% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) for the Westside IV/V Pressure Plane, divided by the added capacity from the ground storage tank (1.5 MG). C-9 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: 1.0 MG Westside IV Elevated Storage Tank (W4-10 — 2005 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside IV Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2005 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 43% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using projected growth in demand (2024-2031) in the Westside IV Pressure Plane, divided by the added capacity from the elevated storage tank (1 MG). Project Title: 2.0 MG Northside III Elevated Storage Tank (N3-7 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 2.0 MG ground storage tank for the Northside III Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Northside III Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 100% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined assuming the projected growth in demand (2022-2031) in the Northside III Pressure Plane is greater than the capacity added by the elevated storage tank (2 MG). Project Title: 1.0 MG Southside III Elevated Storage Tank off Crowley Plover Road (S3-10 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Southside III Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Southside III. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 70% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using projected growth in demand (2027-2031) in the Southside III Pressure Plane, divided by the capacity added by the elevated storage tank (1 MG). C-10 Appendix C Water CIP Projects Project Title: 5.0 MG Southside II Ground Storage Tank at the McCart Pump Station (S3-7 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 5.0 MG ground storage tank at the McCart Pump Station. Purpose: This improvement is to provide additional storage facilities that are needed in the surrounding areas. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 23% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using the projected growth in demand (2029-2031) for the Southside III Pressure Plane, divided by the added capacity from the ground storage tank that would be allocated to the Southside III Pressure Plane (3 MG). Project Title: 1.0 MG Northside IV Elevated Storage Tank (N4-5 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 1.0 MG elevated storage tank for the Northside IV Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Northside IV Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 8% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using projected growth in demand (2029-2031) for the Northside IV Pressure Plane, divided by the added capacity from the elevated storage tank (1 MG). Project Title: 0.5 MG Westside V Elevated Storage Tank (W5-5 — 2017 MP) Description: Design and construction of a 0.5 MG elevated storage tank for the Westside V Pressure Plane. Purpose: In order to meet operational storage requirements and higher water demand due to the projected population, additional storage facilities are needed in the Westside V Pressure Plane. This project was recommended in the 2017 Water Master Plan Update. Allocation: This project is allocated 14% to growth in the study period. Allocation was determined using projected growth in demand (2029-2031) for the Westside V Pressure Plane, multiplied by the proportion of the elevated storage to be provided by the elevated storage tank, divided by the added capacity from the elevated storage tank (0.5 MG). C-11 Appendix C Water CIP Projects ENGINEERING STUDIES Project Title: 2005 Water Master Plan (2005-2025) Description: An engineering study to update the 1994 Water Master Plan. Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20-year period from 2005 to 2025. This plan was updated again in 2014. The water master plan guides the capital improvements program to ensure cost effective expansion of the system. Allocation: 15% of the cost for the 2005 Water Master Plan is allocated to the study period as three of the twenty years of the plan's useful life are within the study period. Project Title: 2017 Water Master Plan (2013-2033) Description: An engineering study to update the 2005 Water Master Plan. Purpose: The water master plan projects system flows and requirements for the 20-year period from 2013 to 2033. The water master plan guides the capital improvements program to ensure cost effective expansion of the system. Allocation: 50% of the cost for the 2017 Water Master Plan can be allocated to the study period as 10 of the 20 years of the plan's useful life are within the study period. Project Title: Impact Fee Study (2022-2031) Description: An engineering study to revise the impact fee ordinance and recalculate the maximum allowable fee which can be assessed. Purpose: By statute, the impact fee report and ordinance must be updated every five years. Allocation: 100% of the cost for the 2022 impact fee study can be allocated to the study period as all ten years are within the study period. The impactfee covers water and wastewater, with 50% of costs allocated to each. This study replaces the 2017 Impact Fee Study, therefore the costs associated with the 2017 Impact Fee Study are not eligible for the 2022 impact fee update. C-12 Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water Appendix D Impact Fee Credit Analysis 801 Cherry Street, Suite 2800 • Fort Worth, Texas 76102 • 817-735-7300 • fax 817-735-7492 TO: Wendy Chi-Babulal, P.E., Fort Worth Water Matt Kusnir, P.E., Fort Worth Water FROM: Jessica Brown, P.E, Freese and Nichols, Inc. Mazen Kawasmi, P.E., CFM, GISP, Freese and Nichols, Inc. Richard Campbell, Freese and Nichols, Inc. Angie Flores, Senior Manager, Raftelis, Inc. SUBJECT: 2022 Fort Worth Water/Wastewater Impact Fee Update: Credit Methodology Memorandum DATE: July 22, 2021 1.0 INTRODUCTION www.freese.com In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395, the City of Fort Worth commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI), to conduct a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study. FNI contracted with Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. to perform a rate credit analysis in compliance with Chapter 395. For this study, Raftelis completed the maximum allowable impact fee calculation, including the rate credit analysis. The calculated impact fee includes the outstanding debt service (principal and interest) of existing facilities with excess capacity and the projected debt service (principal and interest) of the future facilities identified in the 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This memorandum establishes the methodology utilized for the rate credit analysis and summarizes the results. 2.0 DEBT SERVICE INTEREST CALCULATION The impact fee eligible interest is based on existing and future debt service. The existing debt service is debt service associated with existing facilities with excess capacity, while the future debt service is based on future facilities. For the existing impact fee eligible facilities, the interest considered in the impact fee is based on the actual interest for the already outstanding debt. Specifically, the existing debt service is based upon impact fee eligible outstanding debt for Fort Worth, Trinity River Authority (TRA), and Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD). The interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the term of the existing debt, per discussions with City staff. 1 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH July 22, 2021 The interest for the future facilities is calculated using the assumptions in Table 1. The proposed debt is based upon the 10-year water and wastewater impact fee eligible CIP. In the CIP, if a project's start date is in 2022 or later and is greater than $5 million, it is assumed that it will be debt -funded. Any amounts under $5 million are assumed to be cash -funded. The interest included in the impact fee is the total impact fee eligible interest for the term of the future debt, per discussions with City staff. Table 1 Future Debt Service Assumptions Debt Service Details Bond Issuance Cost Assumption 2.0% Interest Rate 4.0% Fort Worth Term 30 years TRA Term 20 years 3.0 RATE CREDIT CALCULATION The rate credit methodology was developed by FNI and was applied to the impact fee calculation. Chapter 395 prescribes that a utility must provide a credit to account for any portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues that would also be reflected in the developed impact fees and paid by new service units in the program period. The utility may choose to do a detailed rate credit analysis, or automatically cap the maximum allowable impact fee at 50% of the impact fee eligible infrastructure costs. In this case, a rate credit analysis was performed to determine the applicable credit for the program period. The purpose of this credit is to ensure that new growth is not charged twice for the portion of capital improvements attributed to them, once through the impact fee and then again through rates. The code does not specifically address the way in which this credit is to be calculated. Each utility should calculate the credit in a way that is consistent with the operation of their fund, the way they finance their capital improvements, and the way these capital improvements costs are represented in their utility rates. The next section describes how Fort Worth's credit was calculated. FNI utilized the projected Service Unit Equivalents (SUE), developed as part of the Land Use Assumptions, to determine the pro rata share of the existing debt (interest and principal) attributable to each SUE on the system for each year of the impact fee period (2022 — 2031). The resulting cost per SUE was multiplied by the cumulative growth in SUE's for each year of the impact fee period, resulting in the portion of the existing debt (interest and principal) that future customers will pay for in water/wastewater rates. This represents the credit to the impact fees required to avoid "double counting" and this credit was subtracted from the total impact fee eligible 2 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum �7 NICHOLS FORT WORTH July 22, 2021 infrastructure costs. Table 2 summarizes the results of the water credit calculation. Table 3 summarizes the results of the wastewater credit calculation. 3 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum July 22, 2021 Table 2 Water Credit Analysis Summary r011 NICHOLS R RAFTELIS FORT WORTH. Year 2022 2025 20 202 02 2029 2030 2031 Water Impact Fee Eligible Interest + Principle for 10- Year Period Total Service Unit Equivalents (SUE) Each Year • • ' • �' :. Cost per SUE .: Cumulative SUE's in 10-Year Period Portion Paid by Growth in 10-Year $260,293 Period Total Credit $528,834 $774,096 $962,093 $1,172,138 $1,382,327 $1,471,490 $1,654,279 $1,626,156 $2,786,360 Table 3 Wastewater Credit Analysis Summary 2� 1 2029 2030 ' Wastewater Impa Fee Eligible Interes l $5,742,152 $5,749,275 $5,748,254 $5,755,437 $5,908,684 $5,137,534 $5,130,701 $5,132,433 E + Principle for 10- 0 Year Period —M ■ Total Service U Equivalents (SU • • • Each Ye • ' • • • : so I • Cost per • • • • Cumulative SUEn® , 10-Year PerlO Portion Paid by Growth in 10-Year $117,966 $231,456 $340,747 $445,449 $546,912 $661,203 $658,446 $737,996 $815,857 $887,036 Period Total Credill $5,443,068 4 Rate Credit Methodology Memorandum July 22, 2021 r� N;CHOLS FORT WORTH R RAFTELIS 4.0 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE CALCULATION The maximum allowable impact fees are the result of taking the total cost of expansion for the study period, minus the calculated credit, and dividing by the increase in SUE's. This fee equals the maximum allowable impact fee per service unit for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size. A summary of the maximum allowable impact fee calculation for both water and wastewater is shown in Table 4. Table 4 Credit Analysis Summary Preliminary Maximum Calculated $677,264,404 $569,442,175 Infrastructure Cost Minus the CREDIT ($12,618,067) ($5,443,068) Max Allowable Calculated $664,646,337 $563,999,107 Infrastructure Cost Service Units 136,734 126,758 ImpactMax Allowable Service Unit Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH® �7�NICNQLS Exhibit D: Capital Improvement Plan - Water Appendix E Water Meter Summary Appendix E Water Meter Summary City of Fort Worth % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 221,072 221,072 221,072 3/4" 1.50 2,698 2,698 4,047 1" 2.50 22,201 22,201 55,503 1-1/2" 5.00 2,040 2,040 10,200 2" 8.00 2,163 2,163 17,304 3" 21.75 43 43 935 4" 37.50 98 98 3,675 6" 80.00 163 163 13,040 8 1 140.00 1 46 1 46 1 6,440 10" 210.00 3 3 630 TOTALI Non 250,527 Meters 1 250,527 332,846 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 7474 7,474 7,474 3/4" 1.50 47 47 71 1" 2.50 4241 4,241 10,603 1-1/2" 5.00 2409 2,409 12,045 2" 8.00 5885 5,885 47,080 3" 21.75 429 429 9,331 4" 37.50 349 349 13,088 6" 80.00 172 172 13,760 8" 140.00 65 65 1 9,100 10" 210.00 24 1 24 5,040 TOTALI 21,095 1 21,095 127,592 Wholesale Customer: City of Aledo % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 82% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,507 1,236 1,854 1" 2.50 12 10 25 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 2 2 16 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,521 Meters 1 1,248 1 1,895 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 94 77 116 1" 2.50 18 15 38 1-1/2" 5.00 10 8 40 2" 8.00 22 18 144 3" 21.75 3 2 44 4" 37.50 3 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 150 1 122 457 E-1 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Benbrook Water Authority % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0% (Emergency Use Only) Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 5,145 0 0 3/4" 1.50 43 0 0 1" 2.50 3,075 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 17 0 0 2" 8.00 87 0 0 3" 21.75 25 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 8,392 Meters 1 0 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 138 0 0 3/4" 1.50 4 0 0 1" 2.50 221 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 54 0 0 2" 8.00 107 0 0 3" 21.75 11 0 0 4" 37.50 3 0 0 6" 80.00 2 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 540 1 0 0 Wholesale Customer: Bethesda Water Supply % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 68% Corportation Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 10,239 6,963 6,963 3/4" 1.50 8 5 8 1" 2.50 42 29 73 1-1/2" 5.00 4 3 15 2" 8.00 2 1 8 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 1 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 10,296 Meters 1 7,002 7,089 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 142 97 97 3/4" 1.50 8 5 8 1" 2.50 44 30 75 1-1/2" 5.00 13 9 45 2" 8.00 55 37 296 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 8 5 188 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 272 1 185 811 E-2 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Burleson % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 13,768 13,768 13,768 3/4" 1.50 3 3 5 1" 2.50 202 202 505 1-1/2" 5.00 8 8 40 2" 8.00 1 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 13,982 Meters 1 13,982 1 14,326 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 484 484 484 3/4" 1.50 5 5 8 1" 2.50 287 287 718 1-1/2" 5.00 140 140 700 2" 8.00 285 285 2,280 3" 21.75 58 58 1,262 4" 37.50 6 6 225 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 1 140.00 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 1,266 1 1,266 5,757 Wholesale Customer: City of Crowley % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 6,467 6,467 6,467 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 35 35 88 1-1/2" 5.00 16 16 80 2" 8.00 30 30 240 3" 21.75 2 2 44 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 1 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 6,550 Meters 1 6,550 1 6,919 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 59 59 148 1-1/2" 5.00 14 14 70 2" 8.00 48 48 384 3" 21.75 15 15 326 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI 136 136 928 E-3 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Dallas Fort Worth % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 28% International Airport Board Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 0 Meters 1 0 1 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 4 1 1 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 10 3 8 1-1/2" 5.00 37 10 50 2" 8.00 351 98 784 3" 21.75 149 42 914 4" 37.50 78 22 825 6" 80.00 30 8 640 8" 140.00 1 5 1 1 140 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 664 1 185 3,362 Wholesale Customer: City of Dalworthington % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 50% Gardens Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 493 247 247 3/4" 1.50 62 31 47 1" 2.50 343 172 430 1-1/2" 5.00 10 5 25 2" 8.00 10 5 40 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 918 Meters 460 789 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 60 30 30 3/4" 1.50 14 7 11 1" 2.50 42 21 53 1-1/2" 5.00 3 2 10 2" 8.00 22 11 88 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI 141 71 192 E-4 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Edgecliff Village % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 78 78 78 3/4" 1.50 1,257 1,257 1,886 1" 2.50 33 33 83 1-1/2" 5.00 5 5 25 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,373 Meters 1 1,373 1 2,072 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 3 3 5 1" 2.50 4 4 10 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 7 7 56 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 15 1 15 151 Wholesale Customer: City of Everman (Emergency %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0% Use Only) Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,817 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,817 Meters 1 0 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 156 0 0 1" 2.50 14 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 5 0 0 2" 8.00 11 0 0 3" 21.75 3 0 0 4" 37.50 1 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 190 1 0 0 E-5 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Forest Hill % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 4,559 4,559 6,839 1" 2.50 10 10 25 1-1/2" 5.00 38 38 190 2" 8.00 55 55 440 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 4,664 Meters 1 4,664 7,554 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 10 10 15 1" 2.50 7 7 18 1-1/2" 5.00 2 2 10 2" 8.00 6 6 48 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 28 1 28 231 Wholesale Customer: City of Grand Prairie %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 10% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 45,494 4,549 4,549 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 443 44 110 1-1/2" 5.00 155 16 80 2" 8.00 672 67 536 3" 21.75 13 1 22 4" 37.50 13 1 38 6" 80.00 39 4 320 8 1 140.00 1 7 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 46,836 Meters 1 4,683 1 5,795 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 1380 138 138 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 939 94 235 1-1/2" 5.00 611 61 305 2" 8.00 1458 146 1,168 3" 21.75 87 9 196 4" 37.50 72 7 263 6" 80.00 18 2 160 8' 1 140.00 1 18 1 2 280 10" 210.00 1 4 0 0 TOTALI 4,587 459 2,745 E-6 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Haltom City % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 11,369 11,369 11,369 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 4 4 10 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 37 37 296 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 11,411 Meters 1 11,411 1 11,697 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 1584 1,584 1,584 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 5 5 13 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 18 18 144 3" 21.75 1 1 22 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 2 2 160 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 1,611 1 1,611 1,961 Wholesale Customer: City of Haslet %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 99% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 741 734 734 3/4" 1.50 7 7 11 1" 2.50 13 13 33 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 1 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 761 Meters 1 754 778 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 38 38 38 3/4" 1.50 2 2 3 1" 2.50 23 23 58 1-1/2" 5.00 6 6 30 2" 8.00 47 47 376 3" 21.75 11 11 239 4" 37.50 3 3 113 6" 80.00 2 2 160 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 132 1 132 1,017 E-7 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Hudson Oaks % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 80% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 846 677 1,016 1" 2.50 11 9 23 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 857 Meters 1 686 1 1,039 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 8 6 15 1-1/2" 5.00 2 2 10 2" 8.00 4 3 24 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 14 1 11 49 Wholesale Customer: City of Hurst %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 99% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 9,454 9,359 9,359 3/4" 1.50 1 1 2 1" 2.50 1,517 1,502 3,755 1-1/2" 5.00 33 33 165 2" 8.00 4 4 32 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 0 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 11,010 Meters 1 10,900 1 13,351 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 465 460 460 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 367 363 908 1-1/2" 5.00 251 248 1,240 2" 8.00 239 237 1,896 3" 21.75 32 32 696 4" 37.50 18 18 675 6" 80.00 4 4 320 8" 140.00 1 1 1 1 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI 1,377 1,363 16,335 E-8 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Keller % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 82 82 82 3/4" 1.50 14,311 14,311 21,467 1" 2.50 331 331 828 1-1/2" 5.00 7 7 35 2" 8.00 10 10 80 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 14,741 Meters 1 14,741 1 22,492 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 370 370 370 3/4" 1.50 44 44 66 1" 2.50 370 370 925 1-1/2" 5.00 93 93 465 2" 8.00 288 288 2,304 3" 21.75 59 59 1,283 4" 37.50 7 7 263 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 3 1 3 420 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 1,234 1 1,234 6,096 Wholesale Customer: City of Kennedale %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 20% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,543 509 764 1" 2.50 313 63 158 1-1/2" 5.00 5 1 5 2" 8.00 4 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 2,865 Meters 1 574 935 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 229 46 69 1" 2.50 57 11 28 1-1/2" 5.00 13 3 15 2" 8.00 38 8 64 3" 21.75 44 9 196 4" 37.50 3 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI 384 78 410 E-9 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Lake Worth % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 81% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 1,663 1,347 2,021 1" 2.50 171 139 348 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 1 1 8 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,835 Meters 1 1,487 2,377 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 123 100 150 1" 2.50 129 104 260 1-1/2" 5.00 46 37 185 2" 8.00 108 87 696 3" 21.75 15 12 261 4" 37.50 7 6 225 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 428 1 346 1,777 Wholesale Customer: City of North Richland Hills %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 58% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 19,429 11,269 16,904 1" 2.50 960 557 1,393 1-1/2" 5.00 8 5 25 2" 8.00 17 10 80 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 1 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 20,414 Meters 1 11,841 1 18,402 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 683 396 594 1" 2.50 404 234 585 1-1/2" 5.00 64 37 185 2" 8.00 827 480 3,840 3" 21.75 29 17 370 4" 37.50 18 10 375 6" 80.00 4 2 160 8" 140.00 1 2 1 140 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI 2,031 1,177 6,249 E-10 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Town of Northlake % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 30% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,931 879 1,319 1" 2.50 96 29 73 1-1/2" 5.00 11 3 15 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 3,038 Meters 1 911 1,407 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 113 34 272 3" 21.75 99 30 653 4" 37.50 1 0 0 6" 80.00 1 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 214 1 64 925 Wholesale Customer: City of Richland Hills %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 75% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 2 2 2 3/4" 1.50 2,778 2,084 3,126 1" 2.50 79 59 148 1-1/2" 5.00 17 13 65 2" 8.00 11 8 64 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 TOTALI Non 2,887 Meters 1 2,166 1 3,405 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 165 124 186 1" 2.50 85 64 160 1-1/2" 5.00 31 23 115 2" 8.00 42 32 256 3" 21.75 3 2 44 4" 37.50 2 2 75 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 328 247 836 E-11 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of River Oaks (Emergency % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0% Use Onlv) Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 0 Meters 1 0 1 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 0 1 0 0 Wholesale Customer: City of Roanoke %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 2,322 2,322 3,483 1" 2.50 101 101 253 1-1/2" 5.00 1 1 5 2" 8.00 2 2 16 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 2,427 Meters 1 2,427 3,795 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 239 239 359 1" 2.50 167 167 418 1-1/2" 5.00 56 56 280 2" 8.00 271 271 2,168 3" 21.75 44 44 957 4" 37.50 44 44 1,650 6" 80.00 4 4 320 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 825 1 825 6,152 E-12 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Saginaw % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 7,950 7,950 7,950 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 7,950 Meters 1 7,950 7,950 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 333 333 333 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 333 1 333 333 Wholesale Customer: Sansom Park (Emergency Use %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0% Only) Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 1,413 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,413 Meters 1 0 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 110 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 1 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 1 0 0 3" 21.75 4 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 116 0 0 E-13 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of Southlake % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 969 969 969 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 8,544 8,544 21,360 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 23 23 184 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 9,536 Meters 1 9,536 1 22,513 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 48 48 48 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 849 849 2,123 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 533 533 4,264 3" 21.75 56 56 1,218 4" 37.50 38 38 1,425 6" 80.00 7 7 560 8" 1 140.00 2 1 2 1 280 10" 210.00 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 1,533 1 1,533 9,918 Wholesale Customer: Trinity River Authority %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0% (Emergency Use Only) Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 0 Meters 0 1 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI 0 0 0 E-14 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Trophy Club Municipal Utility % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 95% District No. 1 Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 2,467 2,344 2,344 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 2,054 1,951 4,878 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 4,521 Meters 1 4,295 1 7,222 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 37 35 35 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 41 39 98 1-1/2" 5.00 31 29 145 2" 8.00 105 100 800 3" 21.75 21 20 435 4" 37.50 12 11 413 6" 80.00 2 2 160 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 249 1 236 2,086 Wholesale Customer: Town of Westlake %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 137 137 206 1" 2.50 449 449 1,123 1-1/2" 5.00 34 34 170 2" 8.00 10 10 80 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 630 Meters 1 630 1,579 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 40 40 60 1" 2.50 41 41 103 1-1/2" 5.00 12 12 60 2" 8.00 74 74 592 3" 21.75 4 4 87 4" 37.50 9 9 338 6" 80.00 2 2 160 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI 182 182 1,400 E-15 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: Town of Westover Hills % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 7 7 11 1" 2.50 110 110 275 1-1/2" 5.00 149 149 745 2" 8.00 41 41 328 3" 21.75 2 2 44 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 310 Meters 1 310 1,441 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 2 2 2 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 1 1 5 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 3 1 3 7 Wholesale Customer: City of Westworth Village %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 100% *Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study. Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 543 543 815 1" 2.50 6 6 15 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 3 3 24 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8 1 140.00 1 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 552 Meters 1 552 854 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 0 0 0 3/4" 1.50 3 3 5 1" 2.50 15 15 38 1-1/2" 5.00 6 6 30 2" 8.00 18 18 144 3" 21.75 2 2 44 4" 37.50 1 1 38 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 46 1 46 379 E-16 Appendix E Water Meter Summary Wholesale Customer: City of White Settlement % of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 55% *Meter count information not received. Meter counts estimated based on previous IF study. Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 5,156 2,836 2,836 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 0 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8" 140.00 0 0 0 10" 210.00 0 0 0 TOTALI Non 5,156 Meters 1 2,836 2,836 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 236 130 130 3/4" 1.50 0 0 0 1" 2.50 74 41 103 1-1/2" 5.00 46 25 125 2" 8.00 113 62 496 3" 21.75 13 7 152 4" 37.50 4 2 75 6" 80.00 1 1 80 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI 487 1 268 1,161 Wholesale Customer: City of Willow Park %of Water Demands Served by FTW (2020): 0% Residential Meters Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 1,841 0 0 3/4" 1.50 3 0 0 1" 2.50 1 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 0 0 0 2" 8.00 0 0 0 3" 21.75 0 0 0 4" 37.50 0 0 0 6" 80.00 0 0 0 8"1 140.00 1 0 1 0 1 0 10" 210.00 1 0 1 0 0 TOTALI Non 1,845 Meters 1 0 0 Meter Size Service Unit Equivalency Factor -Residential Number of Meters Number of Meters Served by Ft. Worth SUE Meters Served by Ft. Worth 5/8" x 3-4" 1.00 75 0 0 3/4" 1.50 7 0 0 1" 2.50 38 0 0 1-1/2" 5.00 17 0 0 2" 8.00 26 0 0 3" 21.75 5 0 0 4" 37.50 4 0 0 6" 80.00 4 0 0 8" 140.00 1 0 1 0 0 10" 210.00 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 176 0 0 E-17 FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 801 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 2800 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 817-735-7300 www.freese.com