HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 20407-09-2012ORDINANCE NO. 20406-09-2012
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35, "WATER AND
SEWERS ", OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH
(1986) AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING ARTICLE III
"CHARGES ", DIVISION 2 "WATER AND WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEES ", EXHIBIT A, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
INTO SECTION 35- 70.2(a); FURTHERMORE, BY AMENDING
EXHIBIT B, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTION
35- 70.2(b); FURTHER, BY AMENDING SCHEDULE 1,
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTIONS 35- 70.3(a),
35 -73(a) and 35- 78(a); FURTHER, BY AMENDING SCHEDULE 2,
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35- 70.3(b),
35 -73(b) and 35- 78(b); FURTHER, BY AMENDING EXHIBIT C,
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35- 71(a);
FURTHER, BY AMENDING EXHIBIT D, INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35- 72(a); FURTHER, BY
AMENDING EXHIBIT E, INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
INTO SECTION 35- 76(a); FURTHER, BY AMENDING EXHIBIT F,
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO SECTION 35- 77(a);
MAKING THIS ORDINANCE CUMULATIVE OF PRIOR
ORDINANCES AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND
PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH
IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 395.052 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the
City to review and update its current Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements
Plans related to water and wastewater facilities and impact fees;
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2012, the City made available to the public, copies of
the proposed amended Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans related to
water and wastewater facilities and impact fees;
WHEREAS, as required by Section 395.050, the Capital Improvement Advisory
Committee submitted its written comments on the proposed amendments to the Land Use
Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans on July 11, 2012;
Ordinance No. 20406 -09 -2012
Page 1 of 7
WHEREAS, as required by Section 395.054 of the Texas Local Government
Code, the City Council conducted a public hearing to discuss an ordinance amending the
Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plans and impact fees on September 11,
2012; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must approve the proposed amendments to the
Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans related to water and wastewater
facilities and impact fees within 30 days of such public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
Part II of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers ", Article III "Charges ", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees ", Section 35- 70.2(a), Exhibit A, "Land Use Assumptions for Water ", incorporated
by reference, is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on Exhibit A, attached
hereto.
SECTION 2.
Part II of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers ", Article III "Charges ", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees ", Section 35- 70.2(b), Exhibit B, ".Land Use Assumptions for Wastewater ",
incorporated by reference is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on Exhibit
B, attached hereto.
SECTION 3.
Part II of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers ", Article III "Charges ", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees ", Sections 35- 70.3(a), 35 -73(a) and 35 -78(a) Schedule I incorporated by reference
Ordinance No. 20406 -09 -2012
Page 2 of 7
is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on the amended Schedule I
"Maximum Impact Fee for Water and Wastewater", attached hereto.
SECTION 4.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers", Article III "Charges", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees", Sections 35-70.3(b), 35-73(b) and 35-78(b) Schedule 2, incorporated by reference
is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on the amended Schedule 2 "Assessed
Impact Fee for Water and Wastewater Schedule", attached hereto.
SECTION 5.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers", Article III "Charges", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees", Section 35-71(a), Exhibit C, "Water Benefit Area", incorporated by reference, is
hereby further amended to be and read as shown on Exhibit C, attached hereto.
SECTION 6.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers", Article III "Charges", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees", Section 35-72(a), Exhibit D, "Water Capital Improvements Plan", incorporated by
reference, is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on Exhibit D, attached
hereto.
SECTION 7.
Part 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers", Article III "Charges", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees", Section 35-76(a), Exhibit E, "Wastewater Benefit Area", incorporated by
reference, is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on Exhibit E, attached
hereto.
Ordinance No. 20406-09-2012
Page 3 of 7
SECTION 8.
Pail 11 of the Code of the City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, Chapter 35
"Water and Sewers", Article III "Charges", Division 2 "Water and Wastewater Impact
Fees", Section 35-77(a), Exhibit F, "Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan",
incorporated by reference, is hereby further amended to be and read as shown on Exhibit
F, attached hereto.
SECTION 9.
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and of the Code of the
City of Fort Worth, Texas (1986), as amended, except where the provisions of this
ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances and such Code, in
which event conflicting provisions of such ordinances and such Code are hereby
repealed.
SECTION 10.
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the sections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and ph-rases of this ordinance are severable, and, if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the
valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality
shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and section
of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without
the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section.
Ordinance No. 20406-09-2012
Page 4 of 7
SECTION 11.
This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2013.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Christ R. Reynolds
Sr. Assistant City Attorney
ADOPTED: September 18, 2012
Ordinance No. 20406-09-2012
Page 5 of 7
SCHEDULE 1
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEE FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SCHEDULE
(ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2012)
METER SIZE
EQUIVALENCY
FACTOR
WATER
IMPACT FEE
WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE
5/8" x 5/8" and 5/8" x
3/4"
1.00
$938
$903
3/4" x 3/4"
1.50
$1,407
$1,355
1"
2.50 $2,345
$2,258
1-1/2"
5.00
$4,690
$4,515
2"
8.00
$7,504
$7,224
3"
21.75
$20,402
$19,640
4"
37.50
$35,175
$33,863
6"
80.00
$75,040
$72,240
8"
140.00 $131,320
$126,420
10"
210.00
$196,980
$189,630
Referenced in Section 35- 70.3(a), 35 -73(a) and 35 -78(a)
Ordinance No. 20406 -09 -2012
Page 6 of 7
SCHEDULE 2
ASSESSED IMPACT FEE FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER SCHEDULE
(EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2013)
METER SIZE
EQUIVALENCY
FACTOR
WATER WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE* IMPACT FEE*
TOTAL
IMPACT FEE*
5/8" x 5/8" and 1.00
5/8" x 3/4"
$469
$452
$921
3/4" x 3/4"
1.50
$704
$678
$1,382
1"
2.50
$1,173
$1,129
$2,302
1 -1/2"
5.00
$2,345
$2,258
$4,603
2"
8.00
$3,752
$3,612
$7,364
3"
21.75
$10,201
$9,820
$20,021
4"
37.50
$17,588
$16,932
$34,520
6"
80.00
$37,520
$36,120
$73,640
8"
140.00
$65,660
$63,210
$128,870
10"
210.00
$98,490
$94,815
$193,305
* Referenced in 35- 70.3(b), 35 -73(b) and 35 -78(b)
"Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are calculated at 50% of the total maximum assessable
amount
Ordinance No. 20406 -09 -2012
Page 7 of 7
City of Fort Worth., Texas
Mayor and Council Communication
Approvedon,9/18120, F, N"
DATE: TVeSd3y, September 18.2O12 REFERENCE NO.: G-1 7680
LOG NAME: 60UPDATEVVATERANDVVA8TEVVATER|NYPACTFEES2012
SlL:
Adopt Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Code, Water and Sewers, Article 111, Charges and
Revising the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Schedules for Water and
Wastewater Facilities (ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS)
k|o recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance amending Chapter 35of the City
Code, water and sewers, Article 111, charges and revising the land use assumptions, capital improvements
plan and impact fee schedules for water and wastewater facilities.
Section 395.052 of the Local Government Code requires that the City update its Land Use Assumptions,
Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fees 8t least every five-years and amended as necessary to
reflect any changes in the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and the Impact Fee
Ordinance. The Land Use Assumptions amendment includes amending the Service Areas boundaries and
population projections. TheCapita\|mpnovemoentsP|anindudeuurnendingthe|istofimnpaotfeeand
eligible projects andnostsforthonex11OyoansbasedontheamendedLandUseAssumpUonn.The|as(
update tDthe Impact Fee Ordinance was in 2009. The City is further required to hold a public hearing to
discuss the amendments to the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan. The City hired
the consultant(s) Freese and Nichols, to prepare the Amendments to the Land Use Assumptions, Capital
Improvements Plan and the Impact Fees through City Secretary Contract No. 43151.
The net effect of these proposed amendments would be to reduce the total amount of water and
wastewater impact fees assessed for water meters of all sizes, including o reduction of 5.5 percent-- from
S1.O52to$S21—in the total amount of water and wastewater impact fees assessed for a typical single-
family dvve||in8. Fort Worth's water and weeievvehar impact rates would thus remain significantly lower than
the rates of most comparable cities in Texas. The proposed water and wastewater impact fee schedule
would take effect on January 1'2013,
The amendments have been available for public inspection since July 18,2O12,ot the Downtown Fort
Worth Library, City Secretary's Office and Fort Worth Water Department. On July 24, 2012, the City
Council approved a resolution calling for a public hearing to consider the adoption of the amended Land
Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Schedules. The net
effect nfthese proposed amendments would be to reduce the total amount of water and wastewater
impact fees assessed for water meters of all sizes, including a reduction nf5.5 percent from $1'O52.00io
$994.00 in the total amount of water and wastewater impact fees assessed for a typical single-family
dwelling. As shown in Exhibit D - Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities page 10. Table 4-4and
Exhibit F' Capital Improvements Plan Sewer Facilities page 15. Table 4-4.
Thereafter and in accordance with Chapter 395.050 of the Local Government Code, on July 11, 2012, the
Logname: 60D9DATBWf\TBRA]HDWA3TBW}\TBD{MOPACTFBE32012 Page o[2
Capital Improvements Plan Advisory Committee(CAC)recommended the adoption of the Land Use
Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Schedules. On
September 11, 2012, the City Council conducted a public hearing in an open session at a regularly
scheduled City Council meeting to consider and hear comments on the proposed amendment with a
correction on one of the Wastewater Capital Improvement Projects. The updated fee schedule was
presented at the Public Hearing and incorporated as part of the attached ordinance. Staff recommends
that the City Council adopt the amended Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and Water
and Wastewater Impact Fee Schedules as recommended changes by the Staff and through written
comment bythe CAC by adoption of the attached ordinance,
FISCAL INFORMATION .
.
The Financial Management Services Director certifies that the Water Department iG responsible for the
collection and deposit of funds due to the City.
FUND CENTERS:
TO Fund/Account/Centers
Submifted for Cily Manager's Office by:
Originating Department Head:
Additional Information Contact:
FROM Fund/Account/Centers
Fernando Costa (6122)
8. Frank Crumb (8207)
N.CX ' n (8250)
Logname: Page 2of2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ..................... ..................... ......... — .............. ........................................................................ 1
2.0 Water Service Area ...................................... ............................................................................................. 3
3.0 Population and Employment Projections _-----'------------------'6
3.1 City o[ Fort Worth Projections --'.._.---..---.~.-..-.._-....-~.-._-....__6
32 Wholesale Customers ...................................... ............................................... ................................ 7
LIST oFTABLES
Table 3-1 City of Fort Worth Retail Population and Employment Projections ... ................. 6
Table 3-2 Wholesale Customer Service Population and Employment Projections ............. X
Table 3-3 Total Water Service Area Population and Employment Projections .................... 8
LIST 0FFIGURES
FigureA-1 VVaterService Area .............................. . ................................................................................... G
Appendix Ar Fort Worth Water Service Area CCNMap
Appendix 0- Water Wholesale Customer Surveys
Appendix C- Water Wholesale Customer Population and Employment Projections
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FIORT '
MMFIREESE
Exhibit A- Land Use Assumptions: Water Facilities 11111MMICHOLS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 395of the Texas Local Government Code requires animpact fee analysis before impact fees can
be assessed. Chapter 395 defines an impact fee as ^a charge or assessment imposed by a political
subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of
capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable tothe new development."
in September 2001' Senate 8U| 243 amended Chapter 995' thus creating the current procedure for
implementing impact fees. Chapter 395 identifies the following items as impact fee eligible costs:
• Construction contract price
• Surveying, engineering and inspection fees
• Land acquisition costs
• Cost of engineering studies
• Fees paid to the consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan (CIP)
• Projected interest charges and other finance costs for projects identified in the CIP
Chapter 395 also identifies items that impact fees cannot be used to pay for, such as:
° Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than those
identified on the capital improvements plan
°
Upgrading, updating, expanding o/ replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing
development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory
*
Upgrading, updating, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to provide
better service to existing development
°
Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness'
except as allowed above
1
Water Wastewater I pact Fee Update
In April 2012 the City of Fort Worth authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FN|)\u perfor an update to
the i pact fee analysis on the City's water and wastewater systo a. The purpose of this report is to
address the ethodo|o y used in the develop ent of the water facilities land use assu ptions. The
e1hodo|o y used herein satisfies the require ents of the Texas Local Govern ent Code Section 95
fortheestah|ish entof water and wastewater i pactfecs.
The City updated its water land usemau ptions and capital i prove ents plan in 199 , 1996 1999
2004 and 2009. This report updates the water facilities land use aou pdons for the yeas 201 ' 202
and 20 . Thbinfor ation will be used in the update of the water i pact fees.
2
Water Wastewater Impact Fee Update
2.0 WATER SERVICE AREA
Chapter ]96 defines the service area as the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial
jurisdiction, as determined under Chapter 42' of the political subdivision to be served by the capital
improvements or facilities expansions specified in the capital improvements plan, except roadway
facilities and storm water, drainage, and flood control facilities. The service area for Fort Worth's water
system is defined as the city limits, the unincorporated existing extraterritorial jurisdiction (EU)' and
wholesale customers. This service area is the area to which water service could be provided on a retail
basis and to all wholesale water customers. Figure A-8shows the entire water service area for the City
of Fort Worth.
The City of Fort Worth provides water to 31 wholesale customers which make up the water service area.
For the purposes of this study, it is assumed that the wholesale customers will remain under contract
with the City for the duration of the future planning periods (2013-2033). The wholesale customers are:
• Aledo * Haltom City " Roanoke
• Bethesda Water Supply Corp. * Haslet 0 Saginaw
• Burleson w Hurst w 5ansumPark
• D/FVVAirport w Kennedale w Trinity River Authority
• Da|wmrthington Gardens ° Lake Worth " Trophy Club MUD No. l
• EdOecUffVi|la0e * North Richland Hills ° Westlake
• Evermon ° North|ake 9 Westover Hills
• Forest Hill ° Richland Hills ° VVestoorthViUage
• Grand Prairie p River Oaks ° White Settlement
Watauga is served by the City of Fort Worth through North Richland H\|b and is not a direct wholesale
customer. Fort Worth serves as an emergency provider for River Oaks and 3ansom Pa/k. Rive/ Oaks and
3anaom Park are excluded from the land use assumptions and future water facilities projections.
Additionally, the City provides water service to unincorporated areas that are not included within its city
3
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
limits or its wholesale customers' city limits. These areas are within Fort Worth's Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity (CCN) and included in the water service urea. A map showing the CCNs
withintheCityof Fort Worth's water service area can be found in Appendix A.
4
FIGURE A -1
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WATER
A M SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES
IPM1e waM i M1�mm ^I gII��
IPM 1Q�14
qk %tWM �
eYx W R "." md$b' ��,.ww,,.wuNb WrSU,+caA ee OeYOmMS6aeN
WJ' PWRni,
FREESE
ICHOLS
V m a r
i i m 4 , x a
�
/ ,� l i'� w r
X!'
MY
rrrtl k h ry' ,
eu
o `� 'i� hr MaA•'
^wk
SIT
k�
p„
Is
C
�w
J rcm
pI�''
�
'PRw71,
2.
to
N \
QQ
d
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
11111M Jill 1111 111 11111
3.0 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS
Population and employment projections are important elements in the impact fee process. Water
demands depend on the residential population and commercial development served by the distribution
system and determine the sizing and location of system infrastructure. For the impact fee update,
populations are projected for years 2013' 2023 and 2033. FN| utilized data from wholesale customer
surveys, the Fort Worth Planning and Development Department and North Central Texas Council of
Governments (N[T[OG) projections to determine the population and employment projections for the
City of Fort Worth and its customers for the planning periods of 2013, 2023 and 2033.
3.1 CITY OF FORT WORTH PROJECTIONS
FN| utilized N{3COG data, along with data from the City ofFort Worth Planning and Development
Department, to develop population projections for the 2013, 2023 and 2033 planning periods. Table 3-
1 shows the City's population and employment projections and annual growth rate for each 10-year
Table 3-1 City of Fort Worth Retail Population and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth gate is based on information from NCTCOG and the Fort Worth Planning and
Development Department
The retail population is projected to annually increase 3.0% from 2013 to 2023 and 2.3% from 2023 to
2033. The retail employment is projected to annually increase 2.0% from 2013 to 2023 and 1.5% from
2023 to 2033.
6
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update -FORTUmA.,
ESE
Table 3-2 Wholesale Customer Service Population and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth Rate is based on information from N[T[OG' Fort Worth Wastewater Master Plan, and
Wholesale Customer Surveys
The served wholesale population is projected to annually increase 2.1% from 2013 to 2023 and 1.5%
from 2023 to 2033. The served wholesale employment is projected to annually increase 2.1% from 2013
to 2023 and I.]9&from 2023 to 203I Detailed service population and employment projections broken
down by each wholesale customer can be found inAppendix C.
3.3 TOTAL WATER SERVICE AREA
Table 3-3 shows the combined population and employment projections for the City of Fort Worth and
its wholesale customer cities. The population is projected to annually increase 2.7% from 2013 to 2023
and 2.l% from 2O23to2O33. The employment is projected to annually increase J.O% from 201Sto2023
and z5Y6 from I023tn2n33.
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit 8- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities ==� "==�?1NICH=~=S
TABLE ORCONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Wastewater Service Area .............................................................................................. ... ...... .............. 3
3.0 Population and Employment Projections ...................................... ................................................ 5
3.1 City of Fort Worth Projections ........ ............................................ .................. .............................. 5
3.2 Wholesale Customers ........... ~..........—................................................................................ 6
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1 City oy Fort Worth Retail Service Population aodEmploymootProecti000 — G
Table 3-2 Wholesale Customer Service Population and Employment Projections ............. 6
Table 3-3 Total Wastewater Service Area Population and Employment Projections ....... 7
LIST OF FIGURES
Appendix A- Wastewater Wholesale Customer Surveys
Appendix 13- Wastewater Wholesale Customer Population and Employment Projections
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit B- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires an impact fee analysis before impact fees can
be assessed. Chapter 395 defines an impact fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political
subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of
capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development."
In September 2001, Senate Bill 243 amended Chapter 395, thus creating the current procedure for
implementing impact fees. Chapter 395 identifies the following items as impact fee eligible costs:
• Construction contract price
• Surveying, engineering and inspection fees
• Land acquisition costs
• Cost of engineering studies
• Fees paid to the consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan (CIP)
• Projected interest charges and other finance costs for projects identified in the CIP
Chapter 395 also identifies items that impact fees cannot used be to pay for, such as:
• Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than those
identified on the capital improvements plan
• Repair, operation or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements
• Upgrading, updating, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing
development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory
standards
• Upgrading, updating, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to provide
better service to existing development
• Administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision
• Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness,
except as allowed above
1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH.
Exhibit 13- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities raM=H='=.
In April 2012' the City of Fort Worth authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FN|) to perform an update to
the impact fee analysis on the City's water and wastewater systems. The purpose of this report is to
address the methodology used in the development of the wastewater facilities land use assumptions.
The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government [ode Section
J95 for the establishment of water and wastewater impact fees.
The City updated its wastewater land use assumptions and capital improvements plan in 1983, 1996,
1999, 2004 and 2009. This report updates the wastewater facilities land use assumptions for the years
2U13,2O23 and 2U33. This information will be used in the update of the wastewater impact fees.
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE
FORT WORTH.
Exhibit B' Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities =F&==~CHOL=
2.0 WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA
Chapter 395 defines the service area as the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial
jurisdiction, as determined under Chapter 42, of the political subdivision to be served by the capital
improvements or facilities expansions specified in the capital improvements plan, except roadway
facilities and storm water, drainage, and flood control facilities. The service area for Fort Worth's
wastewater system is defined as the city limits, the unincorporated existing extraterritorial jurisdiction
(ET]), and wholesale customers. The service area is the area to which wastewater service could be
provided on a retail basis and to all wholesale wastewater customers. Figure B-1shows the entire
wastewater service area for the City of Fort Worth.
The City of Fort Worth provides wastewater service to 23 wholesale customers which make up the
wastewater service area. For the purposes ofthis study, bb assumed that the wholesale customers will
remain under contract with the City for the duration of the future planning periods (2013'2033). The
wholesale customers include all or part of:
• Benbrook Water Authority ° Haltom City a Saginaw
• Bethesda Water Supply Corp. 0 Hurst 0 Sansom Park
• Blue Mound 0 Kennpdale 0 Trinity River Authority
• Crowley w North Richland Hills 0 Westover Hills
• EdgedVfViUage 0 Pannego w VVestwmrthWUage
• Evermen 0 Richland Hills 0 White Settlement
• Forest Hill ° River Oaks
The City also provides wastewater service \u unincorporated areas that are not included within its limits
nr wholesale customers' city limits.
3
FIGURE B -1
W.w amt am, CITY OF FORT WORTH
&nMfO%W.1. c p v%
ataexwxfa fmt loft 100% WASTEWATER
i&erbsm amt soot —loft
ar uii�w °"' °' °.. iom 1� Imo_. SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES
a
...1 aaox soot Loox �+, LESi.FtI2
w«s1 wu1 afnx amx coax
Nckwn a0a% l00% tda% 'x „1 Crty LMh
zt ns
faw.u...lel
renn:aHf M -
n � +"
n manwm nrea ems ut sxt w I
cnt )St )51 Tr;.. A N— ` , CrwN y� wWM1.ON..wwN . � C
vetoman
gun
SM1WM%IYk 1fali 10016 Im% ;` � `\ 1 4 � � /���✓ J� �"gw��Yk�.apN�a.$�a�p �
o
T %n ciwr %a% — m6 m OK \ 4 / ✓ / / / i 0.A'd!M 1 WYLI
n aeon ams oox ✓ ✓ FRI"'" RT C
nfis cams Tmx aofx \ /j `� ,1 �MINICHOLS
mmwln va . aoox aom6 Loot � � � ✓✓; �� "p �I
h
7 � 1
c
al'dx ✓ya s ;.
6,
r
X
" lk, � ! '� t `^4 1 IN
aw
,«,"k ✓ .�!''r;�lay�w��yyy"��, ,.��Ll "�j," ""aml^r "'I,�'^
I!",� wl'"rvy�4
0
yft"n k x k
Zyy6NKµ„a i"A
�
m
✓tiff x �"
\ / x '� a d" ✓ �
U !
ym�,� p, K wal+xKa%u¢ 1
w
'
�Xl
� �., °�, '�'� /� / / / / /�� F,w✓ y ,� gym, a m .h M i"a" yam,��✓l�m M� x �'
�"'"*w� �'`�` � �"" �� ��(��'��"M�w,�w §t M�J�'i`"�";rh ,�bLTMI� �'*, q^n tsyr`,�' A �' ��`�`" � 5•�1
FORTWORT
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE
Exhibit B- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities rMINICHOLS
Population and employment projections are important elements in the impact fee process. Wastewater
flows depend on the residential population and commercial development served by the collection
system and determine the sizing and location of collection system infrastructure. For the impact tee
update populations are projected for years 2013' 2023 and 2033. FN| utilized data from wholesale
customer surveys the Fort Worth Planning and Development Department and North Central Texas
Council of Governments (NCTC0G) projections to determine the population and employment
projections for the City of Fort Worth and its customers for the planning periods of 2013' 2023 and
2033.
3.1 CITY OFFORT WORTH PROJECTIONS
FN| utilized NCTCO6 data, along with data from the City of Fort Worth Planning and Development
Department, to develop population projections for the 2013, 2023 and 2033 planning periods. Table 3-
1 shows the City's population and employment projections and annual growth rate for each 10-year
Table 3-1 City ofFort Worth Retail Service Population
and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth Rate is based on information from N[T[OG and the Fort Worth Planning and
Development Department
5
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH.,
Exhibit 13- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities IrAIRMICH.L.
The Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) retail service population is projected to annually
increase 2.7% from 2013 to 2023 and 2.2% from 2023 to 2033. The Village Creek WRIF retail service
employment is projected to annually increase 1.8% from 2013 to 2023 and 1.4% from 2023 to 2033.
3.2 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS
Surveys were sent out by the City of Fort Worth to each wholesale customer to provide population and
employment projections for each planning period. Wholesale customers were contacted with follow-up
emai|s or phone calls if no survey was returned by the requested due date. If no survey was returned,
FN| used projection information from N[T[OGtoestimate population and employment. The wholesale
customer surveys received by FN| can be found in Appendix A. The completed surveys were compared
tm the NCT[DG projections to check for validity and consistency. Adjustments were made topopulation
and employment projections where necessary. Table 3-2 summarizes the sum of the wholesale
customer population and employment projections within the City of Fort Worth's wastewater service
a^ea.
Table 3'2 Wholesale Customer Service Population and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth Rate is based on information from NCTCOG, Fort Worth Wastewater Master Plan, and
Wholesale Customer Surveys
6
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FOR'r WORTH.
Exhibit 13- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities IrMEM.K.OLS
The Village CneekVVRF wholesale service population is projected to annually increase 1.5% from 2013 to
2023 and L1% from 2023 to 2033. The Village Creek WRF wholesale service employment is projected to
annually increase 2.1V6from 2013 to 2023 and 1.406from 2023 to 2033. Detailed service population and
employment projections broken down by each wholesale customer can be found in Appendix B.
3.3 TOTAL WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA
Table 3-3 shows the combined population and employment projections for the City of Fort Worth, and
its wholesale customer cities. The total Village Creek VVKFservice population is projected to annually
increase 2.3% from 2013 to 2023 and l.9Y6from 2023 to 2083. The total Village CreekVVRF service
employment i^ projected to annually increase 19Y6 from 2U13io2O23 and 1.496 from Z0I3toZ039.
Table 3-3 Total Wastewater Service Area Population and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth Rate is based on information from NCTCOG' the Fort Worth Planning and
Development Department and Wholesale Customer Surveys
N
W, I W�wm
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update - FORTWORTH.,
Exhibit B- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities MECHOLS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... ..............................1
2.0 Wastewater Service Area ........................................................................................ ............................... 3
3.0 Population and Employment Projections ........................................................ ............................... 5
3.1 City of Fort Worth Projections ....................................................................... ............................... 5
3.2 Wholesale Customers ........................................................................................ ............................... 6
3.3 Total Wastewater Service Area ..................................................................... ............................... 7
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3 -1 City of Fort Worth Retail Service Population and Employment Projections ... 5
Table 3 -2 Wholesale Customer Service Population and Employment Projections ............. 6
Table 3 -3 Total Wastewater Service Area Population and Employment Projections ....... 7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure B -1 Wastewater Service Area ........................................................................... ..............................4
Appendix A- Wastewater Wholesale Customer Surveys
Appendix B- Wastewater Wholesale Customer Population and Employment Projections
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FRSESE FORTWORTH.
Exhibit 13- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires an impact fee analysis before impact fees can
be assessed. Chapter 395 defines an impact fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political
subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of
capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development."
In September 2001, Senate Bill 243 amended Chapter 395, thus creating the current procedure for
implementing impact fees. Chapter 395 identifies the following items as impact fee eligible costs:
• Construction contract price
• Surveying, engineering and inspection fees
• Land acquisition costs
• Cost of engineering studies
• Fees paid to the consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan (CIP)
• Projected interest charges and other finance costs for projects identified in the CIP
Chapter 395 also identifies items that impact fees cannot used be to pay for, such as:
• Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than those
identified on the capital improvements plan
• Repair, operation or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements
• Upgrading, updating, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing
development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory
standards
• Upgrading, updating, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to provide
better service to existing development
• Administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision
• Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness,
except as allowed above
1
Water Wastewater I pact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH.
Exhibit B- Land Use Assu ptions: Wastewater Facilities IFMINICHOLS
in April 201I the City of Fort Worth authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FN|) to perfor an update to
the i pact fee analysis on the City's water and wastewater syste s. The purpose of this report is to
address the ethodo|o y used in the develop ent of the wastewater facilities land use aou ptionx.
The ethoJo|o y used herein satisfies the require ents of the Texas Local Govern ent Code Section
B5 for the establish entof water and wastewater } pact fees.
The City updated its wastewater land useossu ptions and capital i prove ents plan in 199 , 1996,
1999\ I004 and 2009. This report updates the wastewater facilities land use ax," Ftions for the years
201 .2U2 and 20 . This infor ation will be used in the update of the wastewater i pact fees.
m
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE
Exhibit B- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities rMINICHOLS
2.0 WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA
Chapter 395 defines the service area as the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial
jurisdiction, as determined under Chapter 42, of the political subdivision to be served by the capital
improvements or facilities expansions specified in the capital improvements plan, except roadway
facilities and storm water, drainage. and flood control facilities. The service area for Fort Worth's
wastewater system is defined an the city limits, the unincorporated existing extraterritorial jurisdiction
(ET]), and wholesale customers. The service area is the area to which wastewater service could be
provided on a retail basis and to all wholesale wastewater customers, Figure B-1 shows the entire
wastewater service area for the City of Fort Worth.
The City of Fort Worth provides wastewater service to 23 wholesale customers which make up the
wastewater service area. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed that the wholesale customers will
remain under contract with the City for the duration of the future planning periods (2013'2033). The
wholesale customers include all or part of:
• 8enbrook Water Authority ° Haltom City m Saginaw
• Bethesda Water Supply Corp. 6 Hurst 0 Sansom Park
• Blue Mound ° Kennedale ° Trinity River Authority
• Burleson ° Lake Worth ° VVautoga
• Crowley ° North Richland Hills * Westover Hills
• G6geddffViUage ° Pante8u * VVeatworthWUage
• Everman ° Richland Hills ° White Settlement
• Forest Hill ° River Oaks
The City also provides wastewater service Uo unincorporated areas that are not included within its limits
or wholesale customers' city limits.
3
3 14% � CITY OFIGURE R -1
F FORT WORTH
awi%wurw Igcw zam tmw WASTEWATER
B�wkwn ... loow mow ra1w
1N% t`)()%6 + SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES
E rfwvr lE lam tam » "�
Evmnrhn fam taw tof
Mau rWl mow to0w lam
UryL h
fal9arn 30D% 100% Sam
wu^u
9. % 92w
zw zw zx
uu warm tmw tasty tnuw =4_11-7
Wa1A kictlwmYa wow $114 941E `Y` 1y, °� \ 1 & �, Wa
has IM Is. r
FI[h4iM NXih Im% l00% to" �4 \ 1 dµ, "nf e y vx /' _ E. 1 1%U Or n 6raak wM4 N C WarMm
91wa oNEC lam tomE tam�i�
tow t00% Y4✓ y, c: /�pry ✓✓ //'' //1 (' py spry ) yN pp
Snsaxn hrk tCOw 00% tam ,"� `^,,, �,~ l ^,n" ✓,(`/ ,a I.. ^!� 4P[kd '9M 15.15 "E w,
r n 9wv14ut1d' oak aE ax f f ✓ ��/' - , m,...,.
Eanw a9x 11 aty f o ✓/ ' mBNICHoLs
co.p lww 1901E tool.{ IM
.-IhW lam t00% lw "' tTM'w xe "e
. AWwaeMnt m094 talw loft h , .N �✓` , w: "' 't); yw r
Qx
�p N
Y %� lm.w,..+„1 aN,u "1Px rr „1 ,WrvM 9, F".... m.------ ✓/✓- .........,___._..y.,.n --4 ..__
Y
+� N
”
�..
Pt
R la tk "M
'MW h by'1y x �'0
S
4 /
�S'�N�M`,� 41dttrtu.tl u
re:.
%mr fi �m
M
... '"G h I v+xs
n � �
NN,
y� >
/ �
/
/w w
1. h
w jlryl
51
Q�I,
�IL � r ""a4 � huh W.rw�rwm"",uxvxn mu�mnnni�x
CNINNIN
y ��-
r 55 !ply
h
s ✓ w
1"S
4 41- .wpm ` /�sa° „ i',; Ir*. r ,omm�n
/ / µ
a"\y`' x V /,✓ ,,/�� i� y ° "�j", �N M �,�"�"" "✓ � 'sue^ �, � M;�'"""s fi� �' w,"�'r ""�.. -----------
`"'�. ". � . `�.. /, /. i �r,! , �iol�fi "� ". ,ManrllsibA;Sr �;';�.n, "m�,y,�5w�a�""'hyN ��rk,�a,�, � ✓ �mM.�„„
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FoRTWORTH.
Exhibit 13- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities
3.0 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS
Population and employment projections are important elements in the impact fee process. Wastewater
flows depend on the residential population and commercial development served by the collection
system and determine the sizing and location of collection system infrastructure, For the impact fee
update, populations are projected for years 2013. 3023 and 2033. FN| utilized data from wholesale
customer surveys, the Fort Worth Planning and Development Department and North Central Texas
Council of Governments (N[T[0G) projections to determine the population and employment
projections for the City of Fort Worth and its customers for the planning periods of 2013, 2023 and
2033.
3.1 CITY K}PFORT WORTH PROJECTIONS
FN| utilized NCTCOG data, along with data from the City ofFort Worth Planning and Development
Department, to develop population projections for the 2013, 2023 and 2033 planning periods. Table 3-
1 shows the City's population and employment projections and annual growth rate for each 10-year
Table 3'1 City wf Fort Worth Retail Service Population
and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth Rate is based on information from NCT[OG and the Fort Worth Planning and
Development Department
5
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH.
Exhibit 13- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities OFMINICHOLS
The Village Creek Water Reclamation Faci|ky(WRF) retail service population is projected to annually
increase 2JY6from 2013 to 2023 and 2.2% from 2023 to 2033. The Village Creek VVRF retail service
employment is projected toannually increase 1.8Y6from 2013 to 2023 and l.4Y6from 2023 to 2033.
3.2 WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS
Surveys were sent out by the City of Fort Worth to each wholesale customer to provide population and
employment projections for each planning period. Wholesale customers were contacted with follow-up
emai|s or phone calls ifno survey was returned by the requested due date. |fno survey was returned,
FN| used projection information from N[rCDGtoestimate population and employment. The wholesale
customer surveys received byFN| can be found inAppendix A. The completed surveys were compared
to the NCTCOG projections to check for validity and consistency. Adjustments were made to population
and employment projections where necessary. Table 3'2 summarizes the sum of the wholesale
customer population and employment projections within the City of Fort Worth's wastewater service
area.
Table 3-2 Wholesale Customer Service Population and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth Rate b based on information from NCTC06' Fort Worth Wastewater Master Plan, and
Wholesale Customer Surveys
6
Village Creek WRF
319,453
127,925
0
TRA Denton Creek
2,400
649
TRA Central
Village Creek WRF
371,028
1.5%
157,573
2.1%
0
TRA Denton Creek
2,400
0.0%
765
00%
TRA Central
Village Creek WRF
412,473
1. 1%
180,961
1A%
rn
TRA Denton Creek
2,400
0.0%
894
0.0%
TRA Central
*Annual Growth Rate b based on information from NCTC06' Fort Worth Wastewater Master Plan, and
Wholesale Customer Surveys
6
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORT H.,
Exhibit B- Land Use Assumptions: Wastewater Facilities roi INICHOLS
The Village Creek WRF wholesale service population is projected to annually increase 1.5% from 2OI30o
2023 and l.lY6from 2023to2033. The Village Creek VVRFwho|esabsewiceemp|oyment is projected to
annually increase 2.1% from 2013 to 2023 and I.496from 2023 to 2083. Detailed service population and
employment projections broken down by each wholesale customer can be found in Appendix B.
3.3 TOTAL WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA
Table 3-3 shows the combined population and employment projections for the City of Fort Worth, and
its wholesale customer cities. The total Village CsekVVRF service population is projected to annually
increase 2396from 2013 to 2023 and 1.9% from 2023 to 2033. The total Village [reek VVRF service
employment is projected to annually increase 1.9% from 20l3to2023 and 1.4% from 20Z3to2O33.
Table 3-3 Total Wastewater Service Area Population and Employment Projections
*Annual Growth Rate is based on information from N[TCOG' the Fort Worth Planning and
Development Department and Wholesale Customer Surveys
7
MILUMMIM-LEIMM
wq
�, N "<. �M^^ s.„
k '
•taw W yv xu
Q, goolp
NQ Do-
«' w
,r '� %,;� � '^"'" a "�„����"��' ;� `"�'M J ���N I "„....w...+✓�^_.^^ ,�"
a,✓ r :.
nn a N r ., r M1 w * u*xx vtti N O^,u
el
J
y�✓
r W
�, ��' �,F /' ✓'�"' ' roa"hrcd ,
w� y it 1
k 9 M
z
f t Mir v,%y h 'TMy
! 1, YMWIf
N `Jk!"
a k
4
4
i�
EXHIBIT C
FIGURE A -1
CITY OF FORT' WORTH
WATER
SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES
�,}NN�
� GunN �+�+aa Gry Lmia
"fwd"
IL
���µWryry,, '�IA19 VMbr SaiNei Ai � EiJ Boxntluv
!!�I:4w�..4w.A''•'�U2J
�,ry
�"�°
IIIMMII WiWr 64IW4i nr .. �Cu tlmWFalMaab
. P� h. .:.mow
�ig11 MMU18MrvbYAIiY ,,, GUYa'MMMVW
wq
�, N "<. �M^^ s.„
k '
•taw W yv xu
Q, goolp
NQ Do-
«' w
,r '� %,;� � '^"'" a "�„����"��' ;� `"�'M J ���N I "„....w...+✓�^_.^^ ,�"
a,✓ r :.
nn a N r ., r M1 w * u*xx vtti N O^,u
el
J
y�✓
r W
�, ��' �,F /' ✓'�"' ' roa"hrcd ,
w� y it 1
k 9 M
z
f t Mir v,%y h 'TMy
! 1, YMWIf
N `Jk!"
a k
4
4
i�
r'PPPCI: AKIn mirwmc mir ry k m k q r m W tit a, r C Q rum,-= A r a z
2.0
CAPACITY CRITERIA ..................................... .........................................................................................
2'1
2.1
General ................................................... ..................................................................................................
2-1
2.2
Raw Water Sources and Transmission .......................................................................................
2'1
2.3
Water Treatment Plants ................ ...................................................................................................
2'2
2.4
Pump Stations ........................................................................................................................................
%-3
2.5
Storage Tanks ........................................................................................................................................
3'4
3.0
ELIGIBLE FACILITIES .............................................................................................................................
3'1
3.1
Raw Water Supply ...............................................................................................................................
3'1
3.2
Water Treatment Plants ....................................................................................................................
3'2
3.3
Pump Stations ......................................................................................... ................ ...... ......................
3'3
3.4
Storage Tanks .............................................................................................. ................... .....................
3-3
3.5
Engineering Studies .................................... ............................................................ .....................
3-4
4.0
GROWTH RELATED ClP ................................... . ..................................................................................
4-1
4`1
Service Units ................................ . ...... ...... .............................................................. .......................
4_1
4.2
Impact Fee Calculations -----'-----_—__--_''---_-----'—_'----4-3
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1
7RVVDAdhocatad to Fort Worth ................................................................................... . ...... ...
2-1
Table 2-2
RAW Water Supply Facilities ..................................................................................................
2-2
Table 4-1
2O13-ZO23 Growth Related C)P .............................................................................................
4-1
Table 4-2
AVVWA Meter Equivalency Factors ............................................................... ............... ...
4-1
Table 4-3
Development of2013 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter....
4-2
LIST OF FIGURES
FigureD-1 Existing Facilities ........ ........................ ......... ......................................................................... 4-5
Figure D- 2 Proposed Improvements ...................................................................................................... 4-6
Figure C-3 Water Treatment Plant Expansion Schedule ............................................................... 4-7
Figure D-4 Pump Station Allocation ...._—.-'................._---_'-----'~..4-8
Figure D-5 Storage Tank Allocation ........................................................................................................ 4'9
APPENDICES
AppeudixA - Exisdng Water Pumping Capacities
Appendix B- Existing Distribution System Storage
Appendix C- Water ClPProjects
Appendix D-ClP for 2Ol3-2O%3
Appendix E- Water Meter Summary
Impact fees provide the City ofFort Worth a mechanism for recouping the cost associated with
expanding the municipal water system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of Fort
Worth owns and operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, pumping stations, and stooge
facilities, and pipelines that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future
investment in the water system is known as the Capital Improvements Plan (OP). The OP was updated
as a part of this study with capital projects and costs provided by previously commissioned master
planning documents and input from Fort Worth Water Department staff.
The report describes the basis for establishing which City ofFort Worth water facilities are eligible to be
included in the impact fee analysis. Next, the criteria for measuring infrastructure capacity are explained
for each infrastructure type. Finally, the additional facilities required to accommodate growth during the
study period are summarized.
1-1
The following sections describe those increases in capacities for the water treatment plants, pump
stations and storage tanks that were considered for inclusion in thecalculation of the water impactfee.
2.2 Raw Water Sources and Transmission
The City obtains the majority ofits mw water supply from the Tarrant Regional Water District (TRVVD),
with the balance supplied by the City's permitted capacity at Lake Worth and the Corps of Engineers
(C0E) permitted capacity at Lake 8enbrook. The City's supply from TRVVD is per u long term contract,
with no contractual limits on the water withdrawn from the Richland Chambers and Cedar [reek
Reservoirs, subject to the TRWD limits. The current water rights for the City are as follows:
Table 2-1 TRW0 Allocated to Fort Worth
Through a series of pump stations, the TRWD has implemented improvements toaUmwwater6nmthe
Richland Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs to flow to Lake Benbnook. The blended water can then
be pumped back to Rolling Hills Water Treatment Plant (RHYVTP) and North Holly Water Treatment Plant
(NHVVTP)/South Holly Water Treatment Plant (SMVVTP).TKVVD also has implemented improvements to
tie Lake 8enbvuokto Eagle Mountain Lake.
The existing raw water supply facilities are shown as follows:
2-z
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit D — Capital improvements Plan Water Facilities rn
Table 2-2 RAW Water Supply Facilities
*Inclicates firm capacity with largest pump out of service
as
The capacity associated with the raw water facilities is calculated based on the water treatment plant
criteria. Therefore the same criteria are used for both mw water facilities and water treatment plants,
with the criteria explained in detail in the next section.
2.3 Water Treatment Plants
The design criteria for water treatment plants are based on the maximum day demand. A review of
historical water usage over the past five years showed the maximum day demand to average day
demand peaking factor tnbel.8.
The maximum day demand per capita was calculated asfollows:
Max = Avg x Peaking Factor
Where Max = Maximum day usage per capita
Avg = Average day per capita usage =l85 gallons per capita per day (gpod)
Peaking Factor ~ Maximum day / Average day =l.8
For the City of Fort Worth, the 2013 population given in the Land Use Assumptions report, times the
maximum day criteria of 333 gpcd provides the following design demand for water treatment:
Max Day Demand =33]Qpcdx7G7,8IOpopulation
Max Day Demand ~25dm8d
The year 2023 Max Day Demand, using the above formula would be as follows:
Max Day Demand =333gpcdx1,033754population
Max Day Demand =345mBd
RN
The incremental demand related to treatment capacity during the study period is therefore 134 mQd
(544 mgd —410 mgd). This is greaterthan a 13 mgd increase in demand peryear overthe study period.
2.4 Pump Stations
The Texas Commission on Environmental Ums|hy (TCEQ) requires pump station capacity to be a
minimum ofO.6gallons per minute (Qpm) per connection, provided the City's system has an elevated
storage capacity exceeding 200 gallons per connection (which it does). The required 2013 pumping
capacity b calculated tobe34OmXd'as shown below.
Pump Capacity ~O.6gpm/conna1koox Number o/ Connections x24hrs/dayx6Omin/hr
=O.6gpmx39J'063 connections x24hrs/dayx6Omin/hr
~]4UmQd
The pumping capacity requirement is actually higher than this due tothe re-pumping characteristics of
Fort Worth's water system. Also, the state requirements are a minimum value, with the City's own
system requirements for pressure dictating the correct pumping capacity, The City's formula calculates
the pumping capacity required based on the greater of the peak hour flow or the maximum day Mow
plus fire flow. The 2004 Water Master Plan recommended a peak hour factor of 1.57, but due to recent
water usage trends the peak hour factor for this study was raised to 1.75. The 20I3 pumping capacity
that would be required for Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is:
2013 Pump Capacity =201]Max Day x Peak Hour Factor
=4l0mgdx175
Where:
Max Day = System Maximum Day Flow (from previous section)
Peak Hour Factor = Peak Hour/Max Day Factor of1J5
or, based on max day plus fire flow:
Z'J
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH.
Exhibit D — Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities NICHOLS
2013 Pump Capacity
Where:
= Maximum Day + Fire Flow
= 410 mgd + 75 mgd
= 485 mgd
Fire flow for the City is based on 4,000 gpm per pressure plane:
Fire Flow = 4,000 gpm x 60 minutes /hour x 24 hour /day x 13 pressure planes
= 75 mgd
The peak hour flow calculation provides the maximum required capacity over the maximum day plus fire
flow calculation. The peak hour flow calculation is used to determine the required pumping capacity for
2023:
2023 Pump Capacity = 544 mgd x 1.75
= 952 mgd
The calculated incremental pumping capacity demand is therefore 234 mgd (952 mgd — 718 mgd) for
the required level of service for the study period of 2013 to 2023. Appendix A shows the existing
water pumping capacities.
2.5 Storage Tanks
The TCEQ criteria for water system design states that 200 gallons per connection of total storage and
100 gallons per connection of elevated storage are required. The City uses these criteria to determine
the required storage capacity to serve its retail customers as most of its wholesale customers have their
own storage capacity. The calculation of the storage requirement is as follows:
2013 Total = 200 gal /connection x 273,347 connections = 54.7 MG
Elevated = 100 gal /connection x 273,347 connections = 27.3 MG
2023 Total = 200 gal /connection x 368,026 connections = 73.6 MG
Elevated = 100 gal /connection x 368,026 connections = 36.8 MG
The TCEQ requirements are a minimum, with the City adopting a different formula to determine their
storage requirements. The City has a total storage capacity presently of 135.7 MG (88.2 MG in the
distribution system and 47.5 MG at the water treatment plants), with 17.5 MG of the total storage being
elevated storage. Appendix B shows the existing water distribution system storage. The 2004 Water
System Master Plan recommended 400 gallons per connection of total storage, but was raised to 460
2 -4
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH,,,,,
Exhibit D —Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities rNmICHOLS
gallons per connection for this study 8zaccommodate incensed peak hour demands. The calculation is
as follows:
Total Storage (FTW only) = Population x (1 connection/3 persons) x (460 gal/connection)
The calculation of the required total storage was made net of wholesale storage requirements, because
some wholesale customers have their own storage. Therefore, the consumption for the City customers
was used to determine the total storage requirements.
2013 Total Storage =767,8l0x(1/3)X4bOgal
=l17.7xxG
2023 Total Storage =l/}33'754x(1/3) X4O0gal
=1585KU5
Thus, the need for total storage during the study period is equal to 117.7 MG in 2013 and 158.5 MG in
2023. An incremental volume of 40.8 MG was calculated (158.5 MG — 117.7 MG),
Water& Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE, FORTWORTU,
Exhibit D— Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities MVNICHOLS
3.0 ELIGIBLE FACILITIES
This section establishes the types of City of Fort Worth water facilities that are eligible for inclusion in
the calculation of the impact fee. Projects included in the OP can serve to rehabilitate and renew the
system' enhance the system to improve efficiency and meet regulatory requirements, increase the
system capacity, or achieve a combination of these objectives. Only those projects warranted by
capacity issues derived from growth occurring during the study period (2013 to 2023) can be included in
the impact fee calculation. Additionally, projects are excluded from the impact fee calculation if the
costs cannot be accurately delineated or if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are in place.
Raw water is obtained from the Tarrant Regional Water 0ot/i*| (TRVVD), and costs to the City of Fort
Worth are tied to usage, which iu effectively captured in user rates.
Financing costs associated with the water system have been excluded due to the dynamic nature of the
financial markets, and the uncertainty this introduces, consistent with previous City of Fort Worth
impact fee studies.
Drinking water transmission mains and distribution piping have been excluded from this study due to
alternate cost recovery mechanisms in place, consistent with the previous impact fee study.
Facilities included in the impact fee study are raw water supply and transmission, water treatment
facilities, pump stations, storage facilities, reclaimed water facilities, and engineering studies.
Figure D-1 and Figure D-2 show existing and proposed facilities, respectively, for the impact fee study
period,
Appendix C describes each Water OP project for the I013'2033 planning period. The purpose of each
project, the portion that is allocated to growth and the current status is also included.
3.1 Raw Water Supply
Raw water supply is responsible for getting watertothotvcatment plants for disinfection in order to be
pumped out into the distribution system, If plant is near a reservoir or source of water, then o mw
water pump station is required to pump water from the source tothe water treatment plant, If no
source is in close proximity, then a raw water line is required. The allocation of raw water supply capital
costs during the study period was made as follows:
3'l
Growth-related allocation =35mgd/35mgd=100%
% Allocated for Study Period =10O%
2. The Clear Fork Kuvx Water Pump Station Parallel Pipeline to Holly VVTP is the design and
construction of an additional raw water pipeline from the Clear Fork Trinity River Pump
Station to the Holly VVTP. This project provides additional mvv water capacity and
supply for existing and new customers.
Allocation to existing customers =30mgd=60Y4
Study period allocation =20mQd=4O%
% Allocated for Study Period = 40%
3.3 Water Treatment Plants
The existing water treatment capacity is 497 mgd. Section 2.3 calculations presented a maximum day
demand in 2013 of 410 m8d, increasing to 544 mAd by 2023. This results in an incremental demand of
134 mgd. The current capacity of the treatment plants is greater than the 410 mgd required in 2013;
however, the capacity of the Holly VVTP is limited by the mw water conveyance of the pipelines that
supply it. Thus, 87 mgd (497 mgd —4lO mgd) of the incremental demand has already been satisfied,
which includes the 12 mGdfnom the VVetsideVVTP, The 35 mgd expansion of the Eagle K4ountainVVTP
will increase treatment plant capacity from 497 mgd to 532 m8d. Once the Clear Fork parallel pipeline is
installed, the Holly VVTPwill be able totreat 200 mgd, increasing the total treatment capacity by 20 mgd
in 2022, satisfying the remaining 12 mgd of required treatment capacity. Figure D-3 presents the water
treatment demand, as well os the treatment capacity and requirements during the study period The
allocation of capital costs during the study period was made asfollows:
1. The Westside WTP was completed in 2012 at a capacity of 12 MGD. The WSWTP should
be allocated against the remaining system-wide additional capacity requirement of 36
mQd.
Growth-related allocation =12mg6/12mgd~l0O%
% Allocated for Study Period =100Y6
2. The Eagle K4ountainVVTP Pump Station Improvements and Expansion Project (105 mgd
to 140 mgd) will be required during the study period. The expansion ofEMVVTPwill
]-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH,,,,
Exhibit D – Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities ra NICHOLS
begin in 2016. The EMWTP expansion should be allocated against the remaining system-
wide additional capacity requirement of 44 mgd.
Study period allocation =(I4Omgd-1O5mgd)~35mgd<47mQd
Remaining incremental demand =47mQd-35mgd~12mgd
%Allocated for Study Period = 100%
33 Pump Stations
While it is more accurate to calculate pump station requirements and demand on a pressure zone basis,
the Land Use Assumptions were done for the system as a whole' with not enough data to determine
pressure zone requirements. System wide calculation tends to provide conservative demand, in that
much of the water is re-pumped between pressure planes. The system-wide demand was used for this
study. In Section l.4, the demand for pump station capacity increased from 718 mgd in 2013 to 952 mgd
in 2023. This incremental demand of 234 mgd is required to serve growth. There is a total of 80 mgd in
pumping capacity identified in the [|P. Therefore, the calculation of the study period capacity
percentage isasfollows:
2023Pumping Required Existing i Capacity
Capacity of Proposed Pumping Projects
StudyPeriod= —
952mgd-872mgd
Y6 Allocation tu Study Period = =20}%
O0mg6
The remainder of the required pump station capacity is met from existing capacity. Figure D-4 presents
a graphical interpretation of the projects included and those attributed to future growth.
3.4 Storage Tanks
The City currently has 135.7 KA6of total storage. The total incremental capacity required during the
study period is40.8KAG (158.5 kAG-117JK8G[which was calculated in Section 2.5. There isatotal of
21.0 MG in storage capacity identified in the OP. For the purpose of allocating the costs of additional
storage between study period customers, and customers beyond the study period, the following
calculations were made:
2023 Storage Required Existing Storage
Capacity of Proposed Storage Projects
��udyPeriod�
3-3
Water & Wastewater Impact FeeUpdate
Exhibit D — Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities
% Allocation to Study Period =
21.0 MG
The remainder of the required total storage capacity is met from existing capacity. Figure 0-5presents
a graphical interpretation of the amount of projects included and those attributed to future growth.
3.5 Engineering Studies
There are nine studies which have been included in the calculation of the water impact fees. The studies
are asfollows:
1. 1998 WaterFadUtiesMan — TheWaterFacilitiesPlanupdate the water treatment
plant aspects of the 1889 Master Plan for the period of 1998 through 2018. The Water
Facilities Plan also made recommendations concerning reliability and regulatory
improvements, Fourteen years of the twenty year study was for existing customers, and
six years of the twenty year study was for the study period. The calculation of the
allocation was asfollows;
Existing Customers = 14/30 = 70%
Study Period = 6/20 = 30%
% Allocation for Study Period = 30%
2. 2OO4 Water System m1aste, Man —The 1989 Water System Master Man was updated'
including a comprehensive projection of the facilities required from the year 2004
through 2025. This plan will be updated again in 2014. Therefore, eight years of the ten-
year life of the plan is for existing customers, and the remaining two years are for the
study period.
Existing Customers = 8/10 = 80%
Study Period = 2/10 = 20%
% Allocation for Study Period = 20%
I 2014 Water System Master Plan —The 2004 Water System Master Plan will be updated,
including a comprehensive projection of the facilities required from the year 2014
through 2033. This plan will be updated again in 2024. Therefore, ten years of the ten-
year life of the plan is for the study period, and the remaining ten years are for the
period beyond the study period
34
Water & Wastewater Impact F Update
Exhibit D — Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities NO
Study Period = 10120 = 50%
Beyond Study Period = 10/20 = 50Y6
% Allocation for Study Period =50%
4. 2004 Impact Fee Study — The 2004 Impact Fee Study provides impact fees for the study
period 2004 through 2O14. Therefore, eight years cf the ten-year study period for the
existing customers, and the remaining two years are for the study period. One half of
the study is for the water impact fee update and the other half is for the wastewater
impact fee update.
Existing Customers = 8/18 = 80%
Study Period = 2110 = 20%
% Allocation for Study Period = 20%
5. 2009 Impact Fee Study — The 2009 Impact Fee Study provided impact fees for the study
period 2OO9 through 2019. Therefore, 70%of the study is allocated to the study period,
Existing Customers = 3/10 = 30%
Study Period = 7/10 = 70%
% Allocation for Study Period = 70%
h. 2012 Impact Fee Stwdy — AlthouQh the requirement is to conduct an impact fee study
every five years, the City wants to update the study every three years. The 2012Impact
Fee Study will provide impact fees for the study period 2023 through 2023. All of the
ten-year study period is allocated to the study period. One half to the study is for the
water impact fee updated and the other half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Study Period = 10/20 = 100Y6
% Allocation for Study Period = 100%
l 2015 Impact Fee Study — The 2015 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees for the
study period 2016 through 2026. Therefore, seven years of the ten-year study period
are allocated to the study period, and the remaining three years are for the period
beyond the study period. One half ofthe study is for the water impact fee update and
the other half is for the wastewater impact fee update
Study Period 7/10 = 70%
3-5
Water & Wastewater Impact ReeU6ate
Exhibit D — Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities M�"NIICHOLS
Beyond Study Period = 3/10 = 30%
% Allocation for Study Period =70%
B. 2018 Impact Fee Study — The 2018 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees for the
study period 2019 through 2029. Therefore, four years of the ten-year study period is
allocated to the study period, and the remaining six years are for the period beyond the
study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the other half
is for the wastewater impact fee update,
Study Period = 4110 = 40%
Beyond Study Period = 6/10 = 60%
% Allocation for Study Period = 40%
9. 3021 Impact Feu Study —The 2021 impact Fee Study will provide impact fees for the
study period 2021 through 2031. Therefore, one year of the ten-year study period is
allocated to the study period' and the remaining nine wears are for the period beyond
the study period, One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the other
half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Study Period = 1/10 = 10%
Beyond Study Period = 9/10 = 90%
% Allocation for Study Period = 10%
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit D - Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities r1an i I NICHOLS
4.0 GROWTH RELATED C8P
Table 4-1 summarizes the growth related costs of the eligible facilities. Appendix D shows the detail
development of the costs and capacities of the eligible facilities.
Table 4-1 2013-2023 Grmm,tb R*kaoedK%P
4.1 Service Units
The differentiated costsbetweencugomertyposarea|kocatedthnoughtheapp|icadonoftheequkm|ent
meter concept. Since the 5/8" x 3/4" xvate, meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential
customer, a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8^ x 3/4^
meter capacity. Table 4-2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the
American Water Works Association (AYVVVA) Standard C700'02, Cold-Water meters - Displacement
Type, Bronze Main Case and AWWA Standard C701-07, Cold-Water Meters - Turbine Type for Customer
Service.
Table 4-2 AWW& Meter Equivalency Factors
4l
Water Q Wastewater Impact FeeU date FREESE FORTWORT11.
Exhibit D — Capital improvements Plan Water Facilities ra I.K.OLS
Appendix U contains the number ofwater meters for residential and non-residential customers by
meter size for the City of Fort Worth as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this
information to FNi The number of equivalent meters is also calculated for the City and wholesale
customers.
The next calculation step determines population per residential meter and employment per non-
residential meter. Table 4-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and wholesale
customers using Z013information.
Table 4-3 Development nf281B Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter
fN| did not receive meter count information from five of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers
however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The
number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per
equivalent meter in Table 4'3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all
wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent
meter, Freese and Nichols, Inc. divided the number ofequivalent meters by the sum of population or
employment served by Fort Worth.
The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2013 and 2023 uses the ratios in Table 4-3 and the
population and employment projections for 2013 and 2023 in Exhibit A- Water Land Use Assumptions
report. The calculation is shown below.
Ci ty of Fort Worth
Number of Equivalent Meters
119,716
Population / Employment
525,108
Population per Equivalent Meter
Employment per Equivalent Meter
4.47
Wholesale Customers
Number of Equivalent Meters
—Population / Employment
Population per Equivalent Meter
fN| did not receive meter count information from five of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers
however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The
number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per
equivalent meter in Table 4'3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all
wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent
meter, Freese and Nichols, Inc. divided the number ofequivalent meters by the sum of population or
employment served by Fort Worth.
The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2013 and 2023 uses the ratios in Table 4-3 and the
population and employment projections for 2013 and 2023 in Exhibit A- Water Land Use Assumptions
report. The calculation is shown below.
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit D — Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities
City of Fort Worth
Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter
=(1,O3],7S4-767,O1O)/].O4
=Q7,482
Non- Residential = Employment Change/ Employment per Equivalent Meter
=(64Z,2h8-6lS,IU8)/4.47
=Zh,Z10
Fort Worth Total = Residential +Non-Residential
=87,4B2+Zh,21O
=1l3'593
Wholesale Customers
Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter
=(45U,26]—}65,8U4)/23l
=36,519
Non- Residential = Employment Change / Employment per Equivalent Meter
=(ZZZ'315-181,5OO)/I97
=1l743
Wholesale Total = Residential +Non-Residential
=36,519+13,743
=5O'36Z
Grand Total = Fort Worth Total + Wholesale Total
=II],692+S0'262
=163'954
4.2 Impact Fee Calculations
Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of expansion for the Study period from Table 4-1 divided
by the increase in equivalent meters from Section 4,1. This fee equals the maximum water impact fee
for a 5/8" x 3/4" water meter size.
Maximum Water Impact Fee = Cost cf Expansion / Increase in Equivalent Meters
=$l6],8689O5/163,954
= $938 per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter
The water impact fees for meters other than 5/8^ x 3/4" are the product of fee per 5/8^ x 3/4^
equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 4-2. The maximum
allowable water impact fees are provided in Table 4-4,aswell as the resulting impact fee ata 50$
collection rate.
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update F SE FORTWORTH.
Exhibit D — Capital Improvements Plan Water Facilities
Table 4-4 Proposed Water Impact Fees
5/8" x 3/4"
1.00
$938
$469
3/4"
1.50
$1,407
$704
ill
2.50
$2,345
$1,173
1-1/2"
5.00
$4,690
$2,345
2"
8.00
$7,504
$3,752
3)
21.75
$20,402
$10,201
4"
37.50
$35,175
$17,588
6"
80.00
$75,040
$37,520
81,
AMD
$131,320
$65,660
101,
210.00
$196,980
$98,490
4-4
FIGURE D -1
i CITY OF FORT WORTH
2012 WATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
EXISTING FACILITIES
4w�Irs�L �° LFGEND
j IK Exlatng Pump S Water Wholesale
customer
�` Exlsttng Non- Wholesale
KV�% 4'vc
,r I` crouno Stb cage Tank Customer
a.
... I a EASing -.^ --•I
Elavatetl Storage Tank � J Ctty Limit
Exlstng
Water Treetmem Plant ETJ eountlary
p c L.N. I _ I C:oumy Bourutary
� l A
stream OR'I' ORTIL
R ! �KFREESE
NICHOLS
a
purl Powaevx
Rench GET an6 PS v q°
v"
I 7
Y' a I _
T
,.11`1
,...
CHlor Roetl 9 S
ors , w wluew awtea. EST
xo;m eeecn GST ene Pa �
%I LeW Vlate Pa
p a.
...Tj C
4k C In NN 6,
`
EST �Y+'
two
y
EegIYM tnS Yll'PM siN WQaWe — wl"
y
RJrIft' Mn Caa T Mgt ` r .v� W /Anil 1 '` - 11
i� ox,NNrsemon,r
8, „ . E
J kInY NYI�1 66T apyny c5
a nNInYH i Pa( n✓ P ,i
.u� ksaab f r l7r4Saup y(d" N M IW GET -d P9
f M k 9 d
1 a
6n)" ea elWAr �Y.
NorlheldY PS
/'�r I qGb " °• eNO7
L u I, ^lxwM" l(ac�l " � q
R
I
Westle oat
a C.ww G " k � d P8 ar� 1 4
'I P8 EM p.,,. i 4inMS y 6W l NA .m . Pa
i E `cif ,91MM0'k V�pWal utl1M .. .p.1 N,M NWI WTP .,.r °^"«'u.. w°. .„. «.�rv.,»» . ..... .... .... e..� ... "...
w b.&
°. �4 ✓wsrlrveR Lyfi p ." y pw "- Rama awm GET rmw Pa
WwYIAY NfiP R.fTlLt CM I/I VIII. GI
I d dl EaT ^ ^° "„, 84kR1Y xday WTP G etlowbroak EST ..
nMEpmM1 nN: ' r nM ' d NWIG�„RC
N.. 037. "Pw...,., Fiwdalds pe EeYlwood E3�._.
� GsTanGPa��' *.
adwe NO Rsnctu M p T Nkn014n
Ps w nmbaertism EST
so wtkvan
mdaYGaT s
rd No""
RaEYem Renall Pa .F^ ^•, � µl,w�a, ......,e..�.,w.ww
�P t'kU'T
1_ eit Mese
EST end PS "Ll ww '� .. 1 Vfi1wG{' G a
aT
i ll� nrcaa c r .S 1 j'
"e •l Rom xur
R:urRU>smm
�fl 4Arinilro g0.anM EaT e _.. i ,.* � �Rl
r
r rv. I I ...Y�
4
1
P-Ltl � ,t "_��'MOCen WT ens Ps ut � o'
Sp co —.T EST
mcmul
..
fM �
I
s y�
eb➢NikVIJ� A t \,
�I
v I,
county
0 18.000
y �au�a
SCALE IN FEET
i
FIGURE D-2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
2012 WATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
clixinty LECEND
Proposed Pump Station Water &holesak,
customer
Wfis c Proposed Norl
Gou8w
rag a Tank Customer pa
Elsvalecf stiage Tank Coual Boundary
Pump staboo City Llmft
Oil E,,prmlmn
qq
Ekisting -J ETJ Boundary
Ground Storaga Tank
Laos
E�dmo g
Wafer Treatment Plant
FREESE FOR"I'MOR'ni,
mm
INICHOLS
+j
S ,
F "o V's I
F4; �a
yEr L
Parker
IR Z
chyob
,17 unta
"!n
Beal E�..
17'
... . . . ... ...
"'"o i Is
— "'Oe
-
L
;A,4
oi—eir a-$
Id. WTP `Q
'I" VIA, i`
Ealside PS
f PL
L �-7
lip
.. . .... .. .
wm,F'
b,eek
sr,
"T
F T"
K
loymc stow
Kk'Au
" 51 pa
S,
eyok"r,
F,
8-
couni,
y
0 18,000
SCALE IN FEET
Figure D -3
Water Treatment Plant Expansion Schedule
600 _
590
2 5$0 180 mgd Holly WTP 12 mgd West side Hills
200 mgd Rolling Hills WTP 140 mad Eagle Mountain WTP
_.. -- 532 g d estside WTP 552 rn8dTotal 2022 "s
570 - — — 12 mgd Wests
560 m8 1 2222x2
550 180 mgd Holly WTIP > �.
200 d Rolling Hills WTP
g
540 I 105 mgd Westside WTP
Total 2013
ain WTP
I
530
520 _ -
� 510
° 544 mgd V
500
490 _
480 u
470
460
450 __...
440 _ �,,m
410 mgd 0
430. . - --
420 l
410 _
400 _ _..,, ..;.. �__....... _......,,,
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
1 Ill S r,vve g', ° ° "i212e —"Total WTP Capacity 11m,Projected Maximum Day Demand
Water O' Wastewater Impact Fee Update w
Exhibit F - Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
INTRODUCTION ............... .......... ............ ...........................................................................................
1'1
10
CAPACITY CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................
2'1
2.1
Wastewater Treatment Plants .....................................................................................................
2'l
2.2
Lift Stations and Force Mains .......................................................................................................
2-3
3.0
ELIGIBLE FACILITIES ......................................... ................................................................................
3-1
3.1
Wastewater Treatment Plants ............................ ........................................................................
'l
3.2
Lift Stations ....................................................................................... ..................................................
3-2
33
Engineering Studies .........................................................................................................................
3'3
4.0
GROWTH RELATED ClP ...................................................................................................................
4-1
4.1
Service Units ---_------- ..............................................................................................
4-1
4.2
Impact Fee Calculations ......................... ........................................................................................
4-3
TABLE OF TABLES
Table 4-1 2013-2O23 Growth Related C|P ............................................................................ .............. 4-1
Table 4-2 A\NWA Meter Equivalency Factors ............. . ..................................................................... 4-1
Table4-3 Development of 20l3 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter ......... 42
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure F - 1 Existing Wastewater Facilities ........................... ............................................................. 4-5
Pi rcF 2 Proposed Wastewater Facilities Capital Improvements Plan .............................. 4-6
Fi rcF 3 Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Schedule .................................................. 4'7
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Exisdcg Wastewater Lift Station Capacities
Appendix B- Wastewater [\PProjects
Appendix C-ClP for 2Ul2-2O23
Appendix D - Water Meter Summary
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORT WORTH.
Exhibit F —Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities r
1.0 INTRODUCTION
in accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Chapter 395' the City of Fort Worth has
commissioned Freese and Nichols, Inc. IFNI), to conduct an Impact Fee Study. This report establishes the
engineering basis for the fee schedule, updating the previous study completed in 2009.
impact fees provide the City of Fort Worth u mechanism for recouping the cost associated with
expanding the municipal wastewater system to accommodate growth in the service area. The City of
Fort Worth owns and operates a system comprised of treatment facilities, \ht stations' and pipelines
that are continuously improved and expanded. The schedule for future investment in the wastewater
system is known as the Capital Improvements Plan ([|P). The OP was updated as o part of this study
with capital project scope and cost provided by previously commissioned master planning documents
and input from Fort Worth Water Department staff.
The report describes the basis for establishing which City of Fort Worth wastewater facilities are eligible
to be included in the impact fee analysis. Next' the criteria for measuring infrastructure capacity are
explained for each infrastructure type. Finally, the additional facilities required to accommodate growth
during the study period are summarized.
1-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update � I T ;
Exhibit F— Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities soon
2.0 CAPACITY CRITERIA
2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) recommends a minimum of 100 gallons per
capita per day (gpcd) for municipal base flow. The 2011 master plan determined that the existing
loading for the City of Fort Worth and its wholesale customers is 97 gpcd. The 2011 master plan
recommends using 110 gpcd and an additional 10 gpcd to account for groundwater infiltration (GWI) to
raise the total per capita for future growth to 120 gpcd. The 2011 master plan determined that the
current usage per employee per day for the City of Fort Worth is 37 gallons per employee per day.
Additionally, the master plan recommends using 40 gped for future commercial growth.
The following formula was then used for the calculation of average day flow:
Qavg = [(2010 Residential x 2010 gpcd) + (2010 Non - residential x 2010 gped)] +
[(Population Growth x Growth gpcd) + (Employment Growth x Growth gped)]
Where: Qavg = Average day wastewater flow
2010 Residential Flow = 993,278 (from 2011 Wastewater System Master Plan)
2010 Non -res. Flow = 522,487 (from 2011 Wastewater System Master Plan)
2010 gpcd = 97 gpcd (from 2011 Wastewater System Master Plan)
2010 gped = 37 gped (from 2011 Wastewater System Master Plan)
Population Growth = Population Growth from 2010 to 2013/2023 for Impact Fees
Growth gpcd = 120 gpcd (from 2011 Wastewater System Master Plan)
Employment Growth = Employment Growth from 2010 to 2013/2023 for Impact Fees
Growth gped = 40 gped (from 2011 Wastewater System Master Plan)
The following is a calculation of the annual average day wastewater flows. The population and
employment growth projections were taken from the Exhibit e: Land Use Assumptions- Wastewater
Facilities. The population and employment projections for the TRA Denton Creek Regional Wastewater
System and TRA Central Regional Wastewater System were subtracted from the total wastewater
service area population and employment projections as well as proposed Capital Improvement Projects
(CIP).
2 -1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit F —[apita| Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
2013 Annual Average Flow
ZO1O Residential Flow =993,Z78x978pcd=9G.3mgd
ZO10 Non-residential Flow =522'4O7x37gpcd=19.3mgd
Growth hx Residential Flow =(1,02GiO85-99327D)x120#pmd=3.9mgd
Growth in Non-residential Flow= (575,222-522'487)x40gpcd=2lmgd
[�, = [(903 mgd) + (19.3 mgd)) + [(3.9m0d)+ (2.1 m8d)]
121.6 mgd
2023 Annual Average Flow
2O1O Residential Flow =99I27Dx97gpcd=963mgd
2010 Non-residential Flow =522'487x27gpcd=l9.3mQd
Growth \n Residential Flow =(�293,7Z0-99J278)xl20Xpcd=36.Umgd
Growth in Non-residential Flow= (689\9O8-522'487)x4Ogpcd=6.7mgd
[,,,=[(96.3mgd)+(19.]mgd)]+[(S6.Omgd)+(6.7mgd)]
[,,, =15O.3mgd
The net increase in annual average flow for the study period is:
Increase in Annual Average Flow = 2023 Annual Average Flow — 2013 Annual Average Flow
Increase in Annual Average Flow = 158.3 mgd — 121.6 mgd
Increase in Annual Average Flow = 36.7 mgd
The 2011 Wastewater System 8Vox/er Plan did not use a straight average Mow to peak Mow peaking
factor because the City utilized an extended period simulation model to determine the projected peak
flows. The model used the RTK method which calculates a different peaking factor for each scenario
dependent un amount of rainfall, peaking time, and recession time. From the lO11 Wastewater System
Master Plan the historical annual average flow to peak hour flow ratio is 2.87 and is used to calculate
the 2O13 peak flow.
The following formula was used for the calculation of peak flow:
Where: Q", = Average day wastewater flow
PF = Average day wastewater flow to peak flow peaking factor
IT
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit F — Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities 990INNICHOLS
2013 Peak Flow
().=o =zZz.OmQd
PF ~2.8,
[�,ak=l2l6m8dxl87
The peaking factor for the calculation of 2023 peak flow is reduced from 2.87 to 2.67 to provide a credit
for reducing min dependent inflow and infiltration with near term C|P improvements made to the
wastewater collection system. The 2023 peak flow calculation is:
2023 Peak Flow
%119 =28.3mgd
PF =2.67
Q=ak= 158.3 mgd x2.67
2.2 Lift Stations and Force Mains
The City currently has 30 lift stations located throughout the wastewater service area to convey flow
against gravity and ultimately 10 the Village CreekVVKF. Atab|e showing existing lift station capacities
can be found in Appendix A. Lift station deficiencies were calculated using information from the 20I1
Wastewater System Master Plan and near term planned improvements. The data below shows the lift
station deficiencies for each time period:
2013
Population* 1,026,005
Employment* 575`222
Lift Station Deficiency 363 mgd
*Excludes the TRA Denton Creek and TRACen|
estimates
2023
I,29],J2O
589,900
65.4mQd
m| population/employment
The net increase in lift station deficiencies is:
Increase in Lift Station Deficiencies =65.4mgd-303mgd=29lm8d
2'3
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit F — Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
3.0 ELIGIBLE FACILITIES
This section establishes the types of City of Fort Worth wastewater facilities that are eligible for
inclusion in the calculation of the impact fee. Projects included in the C|P can serve to rehabilitate and
renew the system, enhance the system to improve efficiency and meet regulatory requirements,
increase the system capacity, or achieve a combination of these objectives. Only those projects
warranted by capacity issues derived from growth occurring during the study period (2013 to 2023) can
be included in the impact fee calculation. Additionally, projects are excluded from the impact fee
calculation if the costs cannot be accurately delineated or if alternate mechanisms for cost recovery are
in place. Financing costs associated with the wastewater system have been excluded due to the dynamic
nature of the financial markets, and the uncertainty this introduces, consistent with previous City of Fort
Worth Impact Fee studies. Wastewater interceptors and collection piping have been excluded from this
study due to alternate cost recovery mechanisms in place, consistent with the previous impact fee
study. Facilities included in the impact fee study are wastewater treatment facilities, lift stations, and
engineering studies.
Figure F-1 and Figure F-2, showing existing and proposed facilities, respectively, are included at the
end nf this section.
3.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants
The TCEQ 75/90 rules state that when a plant reaches 75% of the permitted annual average flow (75% of
166 is 124.5 K8GD) for three consecutive months, the facility must begin planning for its next expansion.
In addition, the rule states that when a facility reaches 90@ of the permitted annual average flow (90%
of 166 is 149A MGD), the facility must be in construction of its next expansion.
The existing average day wastewater treatment capacity is 166 mgd. An additional 36.7 mgd of capacity
will be required during the study period' as calculated in Section Zl The 2013 Village Creek VVRF
projected average day Mnwa and peak Uwx rates for the VCVVRF are 121.6 mgd and 349 mgd'
respectively. The 2023 Village Creek VVRF projected average day flows and peak Oovv rates for the
VCVVRF are 158.3 mQd and 423 mgd' respectively. According to the Figure F'3' the Village Creek VVRF
could potentially reach the 75% capacity level in 2014 and the 90% capacity level in 2019.
The following formula was used for the calculation of the allocation for the Village Creek WRF Peak flow
diversion structure:
3'1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update MAICHOLS
Exhibit F— Capital improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
2029 Peak F�w
StudyPehod=
2[Q3Y[VVRF Peak Flow Capacity
Y6 Allocation for Study Period = --�����
469mg6
20l3V[VVRFPeak Flow [a k Flow
XlO0%
2OI3 Peak Flow
349 mgd
The following wastewater treatment plant capital projects are eligible for inclusion in the impact fee
I. Mary's Creek VVRF site selection and land purchase
96 Allocated for Study Period =1O%
2. Village Creek VVRF Peak Flow Diversion Structure
% Allocated for Study Period =Q5%
3. Mary's Creek VVR[ Phase l (Permitting and Engineering)
% Allocated for Study Period =1OO96
4. Village Creek VVRF Replace Primary Clarifiers 1-12 & Grit System (Phase 2B of 191 m8d
expansion)
Y6 Allocated for Study Period =40%
5. Village [reekVVRF Expansion to 191 [W5D (Phase 2A secondary systems expansion -
aeration, clarifier, filter, hydraulics, pumping)
96 Allocated for Study Period =40%
6. Village Creek VVmF Expansion to191K4GDCapacity Solids Treatment and Devvatering
% Allocated for Study Period = 40%
3.2 Lift Stations
Section 22 calculated the net increase in |dt station deficiencies to be 29.1 mgd. The wastewater [|P
lists several lift station projects, which are eligible for inclusion in the impact fee calculation. These |dt
station projects will provide an additional 96.7 mgd of capacity. The allocation of the lift stations is
calculated below:
Increase in Lift Station Deficiencies ��udyPer\od= X100%
Capacity of Proposed Lift Station Projects
96�v��v�yper�d= X100% = 30.1%
Allocation 967m&d
S-2
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH.
Exhibit F —[apita| Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
The remaining 89.9% of the costs of these projects will be allocated to future growth beyond the study
Figure F-4 provides the comparison of the lift station projects and the lift station capacity required for
future growth.
3.3 Engineering Studies
There are nine studies which have been included in the calculation of the wastewater impact fees. The
studies are as follows:
1. Wastewater Facilities Plan' The Wastewater Facilities Plan updated the wastewater
treatment plant needs for the period of 2000 through 2020. Twelve years of the twenty
year study was for existing customers. Eight years of the twenty year study was for the
study period. The calculation of the allocation was asfollows:
Existing Customers ~ 12/20 =6O%
Study Period = 8/20 =4O96
% Allocation for Study Period = 40%
2. I011 Wastewater System Master Plan- The 2011 master plan was an update of the
1999 study and includes the planning period 2010 through 2030. Two years of the
twenty year study was for existing customers. Ten of the twenty years in the planning
period are included in the impact fee study period. Therefore 50% is allocated tothe
study period and the remaining 40% is allocated to the period beyond the study period.
Existing Customers = 2/20 =I0Y6
Study Period ~ 10/20 =50Y6
Beyond Study Period = 8/20 =40%
% Allocation for Study Period = 50%
3. Conveyance Study- The Wastewater Conveyance Study is a 20-year planning document
for the period 2000 through 2020. Twelve years of the twenty year study was for
existing customers. Eight years of the twenty year study was for the study period. The
calculation of the allocation was asfollows:
Existing Customers = 12/20 =0O%
Study Period = 8/20 =4O96
% Allocation for Study Period = 40%
4. 2004 Impact Fee Study- The 2004 Impact Fee Study provides impact fees for the study
period 2004 through 2014. Therefore, eight years of the ten-year study period for the
existing customers, and the remaining two years is for the study period. One half ofthe
study is for the water impact fee update and the other half is for the wastewater impact
fee update.
3-3
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update F FORT T
Exhibit F — Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
Existing Customers = 8/10 = 80%
Study Period = 2/10 = 20%
% Allocation for Study Period = 20%
5, 2009 Impact Fee Study- The 2009 Impact Fee Study provides impact fees for the study
period 2009 through 2019. Therefore, three years of the ten -year study period for the
existing customers, and the remaining seven years are for the study period. One half of
the study is for the water impact fee update and the other half is for the wastewater
impact fee update.
Existing Customers = 3/10 = 30%
Study Period = 7/10 = 70%
% Allocation for Study Period = 70%
6. 2012 Impact Fee Study- The 2012 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees for the
study period 2013 through 2023. Therefore, ten years of the ten -year study period are
allocated to the study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update
and the other half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Study Period = 10 /10 = 100%
% Allocation for Study Period = 100%
7. 2015 Impact Fee Study- The 2015 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees for the
study period 2015 through 2025. Therefore, seven years of the ten -year study period
are allocated to the study period, and the remaining three years are for the period
beyond the study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and
the other half is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Study Period = 7/10 = 70%
Beyond Study Period = 3/10 = 30%
% Allocation for Study Period = 70 %
8. 2018 Impact Fee Study- The 2018 Impact Fee Study will provide impact fees for the
study period 2018 through 2028. Therefore, four years of the ten -year study period is
allocated to the study period, and the remaining six years are for the period beyond the
study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the other half
is for the wastewater impact fee update.
Study Period = 4/10 = 40%
Beyond Study Period = 6/10 = 60%
% Allocation for Study Period = 40 %
9. 2021 Wastewater System Master Plan- The 2021 master plan will be an update of the
2011 study and includes the planning period 2021 through 2041. Two of the twenty
years in the planning period are included in the impact fee study period. Therefore 10%
is allocated to the study period and the remaining 90% is allocated to the period beyond
the study period.
Study Period = 2/20 = 10%
3 -4
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit F — Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
Beyond Study Period = 18/20 =9O%
% Allocation for Study Period = 10%
10. 2021 Impact Fee Study The 2021 Impact Fe* Study will provide impact fees for the
study period 2021 through 2031. Therefore, one year ufthe ten-year study period is
allocated to the study period, and the remaining nine years are for the period beyond
the study period. One half of the study is for the water impact fee update and the other
half b for the wastewater impact fee update.
Study Period = 1/10 =l0%
Beyond Study Period = 9/10 =90&
% Allocation for Study Period =10%
Appendix B describes each Wastewater CIP project for the 2013-2023 planning period. The purpose of
each project, the portion that are allocated to growth and the current status is also included.
3-5
Water &Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Exhibit F —Capita| Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
4.0 GROWTH RELATED CIP
Table 4-1 summarizes the growth related costs of the eligible facilities. Appendix C shows the detailed
development of the costs and capacities of the eligible facilities.
Table 4-1 2013-2023 Growth Related C%P
4.1 Service Units
The differentiated costs between customer types are allocated through the application of the equivalent
meter concept. Since the 5/8^ x 3/4" water meter is the most frequently used meter by the residential
customer, a factor has been calculated to relate the capacities of other meter sizes to the 5/8^ x 3/4^
meter capacity. Table 4'2 presents the factors developed using capacity information from the
American Water VVo/ko Association (AVVVVA) Standard C700'02' Cold-Water Meters — Displacement
Type, Bronze Main Case and AVVVVA Standard C701-07. Cold-Water Meters — Turbine Type' for
Customer Service.
Table 4-2 &WWA Meter Equivalency Factors
4-1
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE IFWAICHOLS
W�
Exhibit F — [apha| Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities 6
Appendix D contains the number pfwater meters for residential and non-residential customers by
meter size for the City as well as for the wholesale customers who provided this information to Freese
and Nichols, Inc. The number of equivalent meters is also calculated for the City and wholesale
customers.
The next calculation step determines population per residential meter and employment per non
residential meter. Table 4-3 summarizes this calculation for the City of Fort Worth and wholesale
customers using 2012 information.
Table 4-3 Development of 2013 Population and Employment by Equivalent Meter
FN| did not receive meter count information from six of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers;
however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The
number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per
equivalent meter in Table 4-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all
wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent
meter, Freese and Nichols, Inc. divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or
employment served by Fort Worth.
The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2013 and 2023 uses the ratios in Table 4-2 and the
population and employment projections for 2013 and 2023 from Exhibit B: Land Use Assumptions-
Wastewater Facilities report. The calculation is shown below
City of Fort Worth
Residential = Population Change/ Population per Equivalent Meter
=(Q2IG9I-706,63Z)/2.8O
=77\IG5
City of Fort Worth
Number of Equivalent Meters
252,602
117,463
Population / Employment
706,632
447,297
Population per Equivalent Meter
2.80
Employment per Equivalent Meter
3.81
Wholesale Customers
Number of Equivalent Meters
120,830
46,383
Population / Employment
319,453
127,925
Population per Equivalent Meter
2.64
Employment per Equivalent Meter
2.76
FN| did not receive meter count information from six of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers;
however, their meter counts were estimated based on growth since the previous impact fee study. The
number of equivalent meters used to calculate the wholesale customers' population/employment per
equivalent meter in Table 4-3 is the total number of equivalent meters served by Fort Worth for all
wholesale customers. In order to more accurately estimate the population/employment per equivalent
meter, Freese and Nichols, Inc. divided the number of equivalent meters by the sum of population or
employment served by Fort Worth.
The projected increase in equivalent meters between 2013 and 2023 uses the ratios in Table 4-2 and the
population and employment projections for 2013 and 2023 from Exhibit B: Land Use Assumptions-
Wastewater Facilities report. The calculation is shown below
City of Fort Worth
Residential = Population Change/ Population per Equivalent Meter
=(Q2IG9I-706,63Z)/2.8O
=77\IG5
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESE FORTWORTH,
Exhibit F — Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
Non- Residential = Employment Change/ Employment per Equivalent Meter
= (532,335 — 447,297) / 3.81
= 22,320
Fort Worth Total = Residential + Non - Residential
= 77,165 + 22,320
= 99,485
Wholesale Customers
Residential = Population Change / Population per Equivalent Meter
= (371,028 — 319,453) / 2.64
= 19,536
Non- Residential = Employment Change/ Employment per Equivalent Meter
= (157,573 — 127,925) / 2.76
= 10,742
Wholesale Total = Residential + Non - Residential
= 19,536 + 10,742
= 30,278
Grand Total = Fort Worth Total + Wholesale Total
= 99,485 + 30,278
= 129,763
4.2 Impact Fee Calculations
Impact fees are the quotient of the total cost of expansion for the study period from Table 4 -1 divided
by the increase in equivalent meters. This fee equals the maximum wastewater impact fee for a 5/8" x
3/4" water meter size.
Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee = Cost of Expansion / Increase in Equivalent Meters
_ $117,199,681/ 129,763
_ $903 per 5/8" x 3/4" equivalent meter
The wastewater impact fees for meters other than 5/8" x 3/4" are the product of fee per 5/8" x 3/4"
equivalent meter multiplied by the respective equivalent meter factor from Table 4 -2. The maximum
allowable wastewater impact fees are provided in Table 4 -4, as well as the resulting impact fee at a
50% collection rate.
4 -3
Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update FREESF. FORTWORTH,
Exhibit F — Capital Improvements Plan: Wastewater Facilities
Table 4-4 Proposed Wastewater Impact Fees
4-4
5/8 ",x 3/4"
1.00
$903
$452
3/4"
1.50
$1,355
$678
V,
2.50
$2,258
$1,129
1-1/2"
5.00
$4,515
$2,258
2'
8.00
$7,224
$3,612
3)
21.75
$19,640
$9,820
4))
37.50
$33,863
$16,932
6"
80.00
$72,240
$36,120
8"
1
140.00
$126,420
$63,210
101,
1
210.00
$189,630
$94,815
4-4
FIGURE F-1
CITY OF FORT WORTH
.,. bwlo cr.r La
2012 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
c.y.rw.uurLa - L,ume�a� ma',u EXISTING FACILITIES
y r ___ �• �d LEGEND
,4 .a. CJ Lift Statlon {�°- .,,,,..,.�clty 6lm3
Exibmg
Water Redarnadon Camer ..�..,. »� ETJ Bounds
cat rWFwIe6aICCOUmy Boundary
Customer
Lake
Stream
'+"— L__ kNF;i � .. � •.. — NOR Wh0ie3810
- I � Customer
,,.
< 1i� xiRm�ft�; IFMNICHOLS
� y�
I to
Vt,— .�..,m
IIA f%
Sendora Rents 43 `, i/
Y mW. r
C U
��I � ens�r a� ,�-Inel LS wa
W.g R LS a f'.. ' ..... /
L
Atb ;� ry fie.
pinruleLa�, } r"� r >v
Cdb
a `7
t^
srw,uv btew�e �
viii —I
1
pv ubL r' r
M.eow d LbSba LS
� m d
y d A `� Mb.lbr ° °...•• �u
SV RB ddltl tI,S wrc -It- L8
C-1. cIr a LS at
PN4
rT3 1
�iuvb Dear C-1 LS v�nep ot eeR wftc
e
M
` werre ivy -.._r
w€smosTOro f � um � LS
Bu1JLa
r
.. CW... LS 'ryN `� Mlnpton
v s i �bbtepb ggg
qp {
a V
1 i
` + Y .lS irrb
h tM e Y LS
Bmb k MM D1. 1
�Hato. send tb f�`t Rla,erawnlSlwun Lm _. r /..JLal
1 G,r J"r �" A uwewearamo ` ._T
,
Summ4rcr4gR ft4rw1Y L8 R
, ery Rid LS
l
II
h
i
x
1 r
1
Jtk�8a'fl
E �Ji "� �; °rtla�rudld.
0 18,000,
SCALE _.... j
FIGURE F-2
CITY OF FORT WORTH
2012 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
Propoeod LM Station WarerilVh Itnotle
Cuero—
Lift Station Expansion N—Mdleskl.,
courny Customer
Exist"
Water Reclamation F.clity City Llmd
Lake ETJ Boundary
I] Stream County Boundary , �x,rn.�e
y r � JrA
FOR'rW(Allf.
SE
FREE
KNIMOL,
J
49
. ....... . .
j,
ok)
....... . .. . .
W '111
M, 11 N'W�
A groom
_C..nt LS N-1
_r aM 87,4— (as
U
Ile 4D.
c-"
A
6 0", b
C.6k WRF
;A
f
P1,11 I A
Ml- WRW
F
6.)
7
d
","'.'A A-1
�71 11 A f� A AOO
'rVl 04 ' ww
!7F 2 7 i F
Rl�hairdl... St..9h Ls
r
gr""
O*k
Johnson
counrl"
I'llis
CourttV
0 18,000
. SCALE rMENEWT
Figure F -3
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Schedule
550a �H
525 vwv�ar ur' aw�g „s
" 14 a uYC.:u Ik i Yk (Y"U
H
500 469 f�,ans
475
450 u m
425 ” o
.-. 400 vo �•
375
350.
325
o 300
i 275
� 250 qdt W�JhI� au.ipaNi nr�i�oui� Ca }t mrrilyd..
225
vo 200 ..�,. �.�—
to �tP' is�rwauttMCt Fop �� �t,y
175 ..� . .,�,„ • ......'.....s r .. r ..............
ISO - Crwr-rrr.r.- r.r�rs.r.r..rr.. �Uk,mm1
125 �
100
75
50
25 .
p ._
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
— . 75% Rule (Planning & Design) .... 90% Rule (Construction) +AADF Permitted Capacity
Peak 2 -Hr Available Capacity -- Projected Peak 2 -hour Flow —1— Projected Average Day Flow
100
90
80
70
60
050
40
30
20
10
0
Figure F-4
Lift Station Allocation
Proposed Lift Station Net Increase in Lift
Projects Station Deficiencies
59.9%
located
r Future
i rowth
30.1%
Ilocated
►r Study
Period
WOW AI~ ty
iw%
100%
........ .............
..
1�
n
iolw%
Fvwrmin
100%
100%
tm
'—
1006
100%
—t
iw%
Xo%
twx
Hest
9^
m
9-
2%
7%
2%
4zWaM
1041%
100%
1001n
4h P dKft
arct
m
7S%
841f.
75%
BtlWM
71
YICbPLt Ah
ow"M
1111111
100%
300%
—
Igm-
1�
1�
W-
xc"
A
—T�—
m
OK
was
lm%
100%
WK
100%
100%
Silt4tmant
100%
TOOK
EXHIBIT E
FIGURE R-1
CITY OF FORT WORTH
WASTEWATER
SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES
E..:
...... .....
FoRr Woun.
J FREESE
MICHOLS
T'
r7
"S
s,Nlf� Nf,
,
w
FtB
r, , k ; k� t,
Wnctn —n � nr r, a ru; r a, Arm n
A Resolution
NO. 4107-07-2012
RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD DURING
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M. ON
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2012, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, 1000 THROCKMORTON STREET,
FORT WORTH, TEXAS, TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE
IMPACT FEES FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER FACILITIES
WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, a public
hearing is required to consider amendments to Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plans and
associated impact fees for water and wastewater facilities; and
WHEREAS the City of Fort Worth is considering amendments to Land Use Assumptions,
Capital Improvements Plans, and associated impact fees for water and wastewater facilities as approved
by the Water and Wastewater Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, as summarized on the attaclunent
to this resolution; and
WHEREAS the net effect of these proposed amendments would be to reduce the total amount
of water and wastewater impact fees assessed for water meters of all sizes, including a reduction of 5.5
percent -- from S 1,052 to $994 -- in the total amount of water and wastewater impact fees assessed for a
typical single-family dwelling; and
WHEREAS Fort Worth's water and wastewater impact fee rates would thus remain
significantly lower than the rates of most comparable cities in Texas; and
WHEREAS the amendments to the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plans are
available for public inspection at the Fort Worth Central Library, City Secretary's Office and Fort Worth
Water Department offices; and
WHEREAS the proposed water and wastewater impact fee schedule would take effect on
January 1, 2013-7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS:
A public hearing will beheld at 7:00 p.m, on Tuesday, September 11, 2012, in the City Council
Chamber of the City of Fort Worth, 1000 Throckmorton, Fort Worth, Texas, for the purpose of
considering amendments to the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan for water and
,FORT WORTtl
a
Lion No. 41
wastewater facilities for which an impact fee may be imposed. Impact fees for each category of
facilities may be used to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of water facilities and
wastewater facilities, respectively, or the expansion of such necessitated by and attributable to new
development.
Any member of the public may appear at the public hearing and present evidence for or against
the approval of the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan amendments and associated
impact fees.
Adopted this 24'h day of July, 2012.
ATTEST:
By:
M
ary J . Ka4er)(Cify Secatary
F4RT WORT
Ell